Some minor, but amusing news. Ridley Scott was at Comic-Con and a fan asked him what he thought of AvP. Someone uploaded a video to YouTube. Check it out:
He says: “I’ve got to be careful of what I say ’cause I actually have a nice relationship with 21st Century Fox… but I think they know how I feel.”
I don't know where you get the idea of it having "realistic action and dialogue." The script is all over the place and filling the pages up with swearing doesn't make it realistic. It's OK, but as had been said, the director even called it a "piece of shit". I don't see why people tend to worship it as some kind of sensational cinematic experience. The biggest failing, as Charles Dance is on the record as saying, is that the creature is not in the least scary. The creatures being scary is meant to be the whole point of making a film in that franchise. PHANTOM: You're virtually the only person I've ever met who cares for the cahracters. Most people can't even tell the difference between the majority of generic bald heads, all seeming to do nothing but swear every few seconds. Boneman_the_Immortal: The Predator had had its "turn" in the last film, too. Just because a couple of them died by being stupid, what difference does that make? The other one annihilated the entire nest, shot several in quick succession and drowned the Queen. Who Givz A Fuk: There has never been any quote saying it is not linked to the first film. Quite the opposite, if anything.
no movies = no option...
Kinda like All Spark in Transformer film. Something that if used wrong could trigger nuclear Apocalypse like SkyNet in Terminator 3. After all this movie is not about an ongoing war but surviving. And the new altar and ship belongs to the new clan who sends Wolf to check things out. What do you guys think. 
I have a feeling its a differ ship with a impregnated predator and it crashes back to earth and a lone predator hunter is sent to earth to clean up what the others messed up. They said to Remember that this film is not really linked to AVP and could be a STANDALONE film. SO HOW IS THE PREDALIEN LINKED TO THE FIRST AVP PREDATOR. FOR 2 COLIN/GREG SAID THAT THEY REBUILT THERE OWN VERSION OF THE PREDATORS ALTER BED RIGHT! I JUST DONT UNDERSTAND? IT HAS TO BE A DIFFERENT CLAN THAT MESSED UP, I KNOW ITS NOT LEADING OFF FROM AVP.. THE BROTHERS DOUBTLY WOULD DO THAT.
I would imagine the trailer will be on either tomorow maybe cuz alot of movies premiere or monday but thats just hopeful thinkin. We will see..colin and greg will come through this time for sure.
No im pretty sure about this one. I have a good feeling..No need to hope..PREDATORS will win. aliens are haterz
You no wuts funny..Ive never signed up on here and ive been going on this site for quite sum time now..you ppl argue over the stupidest chitt.AVP sucked but you no wut at least there doing sumthing with AVP 2.. They own there own Visual Effects company so at least the visual effects are in TOP NOTCH hands you dig...And for the predalien it would look better with the dreads and the wrist blade alien tail..Who cares about the alien traits and who is any of you people to say what it is supposed to look like.Your opinoins do not matter..From what colin and greg said so far it is gonna be a bad azz movie..OHH yeah and the only reason most of you are complaining is because this PREDATOR is gonna FUC* them ALIENS up and you guys are just salty..AVP sucked but the preds got there ass kicked, but not this one..Its THE PREDATORS TURN!!!...
AVP lacked almost everything! The cast sucked, the director sucked, and the editing alone made the movie very hard to watch at times. Yeah it was fun because it's about Aliens and Predators but it's nothing like AR. Alien 4 had much more class, AVP had no class what so ever.
Cameron has mellowed in his opinion of it, saying the cinematography is great, but still doesn't like it very much. Neither do I. I don't think 'Predator 2' is much more than mediocre, except when the creature is in a scene. Those are the only points it's ever good and even a few of those were done for comedy, which just lessened the impact. I'm with Cameron. I was personally fairly entertained by 'Alien Versus Predator'. That doesn't mean to say it's magical, but could have been hugely worse and the last two 'Alien' sequels, before it, were not nearly as entertaining for me. This 'holier than thou' attitude when it comes to 'Alien Versus Predator' has got sickeningly trendy, recently. All the people who do it are going to be reversing their opinions with fondness in a few years or so, just like people miraculously did for 'Alien 3', 'Alien Resurrection' and 'Predator 2'. It's a pattern. That's how it is. Ridley Scott is great, but I'm not sure he would necessarily be a good choice for a director of this particular franchise now. The last time he spoke about it, he wanted Space Jockey ships to be shown bombarding our worlds with eggs (yeah, the same eggs Ripley incinerated with an ordinary flamethrower), above atmosphere.
?
