Quote from: Shaeffer11 on Mar 24, 2019, 03:39:28 AM
I would have liked to see if they would've shown the Emissaries out loose to hunt like it said in the prequel even if it was in a controlled setting, for me I feel cheated on that they had a substantial budget for a Predator movie and we got something less than the director's vision due to external pressures aka producers feeling the outside noise
Going by what we know of regarding production budgets for these films and not adjusting for inflation because I'm lazy.
Predator: 15 million
Predator 2: N/A
Predators: 40 million
Aliens Versus Predator: 60 million
Aliens Versus Predator: Requiem: N/A
The Predator has a final budget at about 88 million and while we don't have data regarding what its initial budget was before the re-shoot, it could be safe to say that it was comparable to Aliens Versus Predator but likely no lower than Predators. It probably is closer to AVP initially, but with the re-shoots forcing a rewriting, re-shooting, getting the actors back, filming new scenes with Upgrade, and having to actually rebuild sets that no longer existed for up to half a year by that point, it's pretty costly.
The Predator made about 160 million. It made back its production budget just fine but while it did make money, it did not make more than it cost to make it. It made money sure, but Hollywood producers want to make more money than the cost of producing. The Predator was not a complete failure (we would've known by now) seeing as marketing picked up the slack so the franchise isn't dead from this but the situation could've been so much worse.
It's likely far worse for the people who gave the okay for the re-shoot and its hefty price tag seeing as it did alright, but would've done better had it possessed a much lower production cost.