I repeat "from my perspective" and there wasn't really a consensus or a conclusion, only two people out of five or more said they didn't have a problem with it, the others didn't comment on that matter and while I still have a problem with it, I simply have not commented back yet. Also I don't think we get to vote if something is a problem or not because if something is contradicting something, then it is an issue even if minor and even others don't mind it. Of course it is subjective as well.
It is safe to say there is plenty of people that have a problem with it, it is likely that just after multiple movies and media depicting it, they gave up mentioning it because what is the point? Fox, Scott and whomever will do what they want regardless of fan expectations or previous movies. I myself feel like what's the point in mentioning this stuff when it is more than likely the next film will do just the same thing if not worse.
I never said his death was a contradiction, Marachuk was comatose and therefor under the effects of the paralytic, removing the hugger at that point would kill the host. Lope was not unconscious, he was litterally impregnated instantly within seconds which is what contradicts the events of Aliens. Those two facehuggers that attack Ripley and Newt should have already impregnated Marachuk and that other colonist if they had the ability to instantly implant a host and thus they should not have been alive for burke to use.