No, you didn't; instead you made a strangely passive aggressive remark about him having other things on his mind than "making an editor's life easy", as though he needed defending from something I'd said.
(Also to clarify, everything Scott says does actually make an interesting soundbite and could provide great information for, say, a documentary, as he does provide insight -- the issue is that because it's presented in the context of the question asked, it becomes strange. The information itself is good, it's just ... delivered at a weird time.)