Corporal HicksJan 19, 2017, 09:47:26 AM Reply #15 on: Jan 19, 2017, 09:47:26 AM Q Quote Quote from: Shamo on Jan 18, 2017, 10:24:08 PMI need to see some hints at the Drukhati!I don't think we'll be seeing them in the films.
UltramorphJan 21, 2017, 01:06:08 AM Reply #16 on: Jan 21, 2017, 01:06:08 AM Q Quote Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Jan 19, 2017, 09:47:26 AMQuote from: Shamo on Jan 18, 2017, 10:24:08 PMI need to see some hints at the Drukhati!I don't think we'll be seeing them in the films. Yeah, but it would be awesome if we did. They Spoiler (click to show/hide)took down the Engineers!
Corporal HicksJan 24, 2017, 12:49:47 PM Reply #17 on: Jan 24, 2017, 12:49:47 PM Q Quote Temp cover up on Amazon.
Corporal HicksJan 31, 2017, 03:28:27 PM Reply #18 on: Jan 31, 2017, 03:28:27 PM Q Quote And here's the cover art (subject to change)! Thanks to Matt Booker via the Weyland-Yutani Bulletin.
426BuddyJan 31, 2017, 03:40:24 PM Reply #19 on: Jan 31, 2017, 03:40:24 PM Q Quote I wonder if the cover art is a representation of the creature in the film?It sure looks like the creature on the poster and it is a bit more fleshy/reptilian like I heard rumored.
426BuddyJan 31, 2017, 03:41:37 PM Reply #21 on: Jan 31, 2017, 03:41:37 PM Q Quote Going by the teeth it sure looks like the alien on the poster cover for covenant, could be wrong though.
Corporal HicksJan 31, 2017, 03:48:22 PM Reply #22 on: Jan 31, 2017, 03:48:22 PM Q Quote It's likely not a 100% representation of the Alien, even if it is based on Stanley. Looks drawn so there's probably some degree of artistic license going off too. I don't think the Alien in the film will be looking that green or white.
426BuddyJan 31, 2017, 03:53:01 PM Reply #23 on: Jan 31, 2017, 03:53:01 PM Q Quote Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Jan 31, 2017, 03:48:22 PMIt's likely not a 100% representation of the Alien, even if it is based on Stanley. Looks drawn so there's probably some degree of artistic license going off too. I don't think the Alien in the film will be looking that green or white.Yes of course, that's cool that it could be an artists representation of the creature in the film though.
Pvt. HimmelJan 31, 2017, 04:06:05 PM Reply #24 on: Jan 31, 2017, 04:06:05 PM Q Quote Good find. Corp.
XenomorphineJan 31, 2017, 04:07:00 PM Reply #25 on: Jan 31, 2017, 04:07:00 PM Q Quote The return of the jaw tendons is something I've been looking forward to. They were't nearly so prominant on the 'Requiem' creatures.
locustaJan 31, 2017, 04:36:18 PM Reply #26 on: Jan 31, 2017, 04:36:18 PM Q Quote Goodbye biomechanic beauty...
426BuddyJan 31, 2017, 04:42:05 PM Reply #27 on: Jan 31, 2017, 04:42:05 PM Q Quote Quote from: locusta on Jan 31, 2017, 04:36:18 PMGoodbye biomechanic beauty...You're so very right, I don't think we'll ever see the return of the biomechanical aspects of the creature, its been fading for such a long time now, I used to just blame ADI lol. I had hoped that Scott would be the one who would bring it all back but unfortunately it seems he is determined to take us even farther away from Giger's nightmarish vision.
locustaJan 31, 2017, 04:48:43 PM Reply #28 on: Jan 31, 2017, 04:48:43 PM Q Quote Scott liked the fleshy version of the "Beast", as he calls it.
426BuddyJan 31, 2017, 04:54:12 PM Reply #29 on: Jan 31, 2017, 04:54:12 PM Q Quote Quote from: locusta on Jan 31, 2017, 04:48:43 PMScott liked the fleshy version of the "Beast", as he calls it.It's a shame, a return to a biomechanical but updated big chap could have been something special imo.
