User Information

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Leaked images from the set? *spoilers within*  (Read 39793 times)

HuDaFuK
Oct 31, 2016, 02:22:39 PM
Reply #210 on: Oct 31, 2016, 02:22:39 PM
But personally, I like to believe that Shaw got the hell away from that crashed 'juggernaut' and nearby 'escape pod' as quickly as possible after getting onto her vehicle with David's bodyparts...

At the very least, it would be stupid of her not to collect some food and water before leaving.


The Eighth Passenger
Oct 31, 2016, 04:26:57 PM
Reply #211 on: Oct 31, 2016, 04:26:57 PM
Why would they stop to grab art supplies from the pod.

"Lifeboat" or "Life Support Module", the escape pods were those little coffins in which Vickers escaped the Prometheus. The lifeboat had two years worth of food on board. Probably needed a water reclaimer as well. Might as well grab whatever else.

She would probably be expecting the Trilobite to be waiting for her without realising it's probably dead and it's the Deacon instead that she would encounter.

Quote
let's just assume that the Deacon is at least as smart as any other Alien we've seen and figured out how to escape the life boat before she reaches it and she finds the door open.  The Deacon has long gone.

It's unclear how long it took before the 'baby Deacon' erupted from the dead 'Engineer's body, and it's certainly possible that Shaw risked going back for certain supplies before she eventually took off. 

No, the film makes it quite clear. The deacon was only "born" after Shaw and David left LV-223.

The images have been taken down on So Is It Any Good.

Ah, so finally "back in the office"!  ;) Remember that trick next time you publish something "hot".




Valaquen
Oct 31, 2016, 04:39:37 PM
Reply #212 on: Oct 31, 2016, 04:39:37 PM
Why would they stop to grab art supplies from the pod.

That's a different question from 'Where could they have gotten them?', and I'm not equipped to work out their motive  :laugh: I have no idea. Long ride, play some hangman?


Kelgaard
Oct 31, 2016, 10:34:31 PM
Reply #213 on: Oct 31, 2016, 10:34:31 PM
Quote

Goodbye subtlety.  Yuck.


SpreadEagleBeagle
Oct 31, 2016, 10:41:36 PM
Reply #214 on: Oct 31, 2016, 10:41:36 PM
Yeah, that's not very subtle at all. Looks like a full-fledged gynecological exam cut'n'pasted on top of a rolly polly dressed as a crab.

I mean, it's a good start (the design) but i needs a lot of polishing and revamping. Needs to be more subtle and elegant.


Kelgaard
Oct 31, 2016, 10:55:36 PM
Reply #215 on: Oct 31, 2016, 10:55:36 PM
Quote
Looks like a full-fledged gynecological exam cut'n'pasted on top of a rolly polly dressed as a crab.

LOL!  As described in the script, I'll bet!

« Last Edit: Oct 31, 2016, 10:59:13 PM by Kelgaard »

Glaive
Oct 31, 2016, 11:29:04 PM
Reply #216 on: Oct 31, 2016, 11:29:04 PM
Yeah, that's not very subtle at all. Looks like a full-fledged gynecological exam cut'n'pasted on top of a rolly polly dressed as a crab.

I mean, it's a good start (the design) but i needs a lot of polishing and revamping. Needs to be more subtle and elegant.

...said, 'SpreadEagleBeagle'...


BringbackJonesy!
Oct 31, 2016, 11:59:47 PM
Reply #217 on: Oct 31, 2016, 11:59:47 PM
@ The Eighth Passenger - Ha ha, silly me.  You are of course right about the 'baby Deacon' being born at some time AFTER Shaw and David have taken off from LV-223.  ::)

(I kinda forgot that fact due to various comments here and elsewhere in the past, which speculated on Shaw running into the 'Deacon' BEFORE she took off - which were all WRONG of course, as she was already away as you pointed out.  I guess my memory lapse was influenced by that kind of thing when I commented in my previous post! ;D)

So yes, I absolutely agree now that Shaw might have bravely ventured back to the 'Lifeboat' for various supplies before she took off.


NickisSmart
Nov 01, 2016, 12:30:41 AM
Reply #218 on: Nov 01, 2016, 12:30:41 AM
Yeah, that's not very subtle at all. Looks like a full-fledged gynecological exam cut'n'pasted on top of a rolly polly dressed as a crab.

I mean, it's a good start (the design) but i needs a lot of polishing and revamping. Needs to be more subtle and elegant.

Oh, yes, chestbusters are sooooooo subtle!


SpreadEagleBeagle
Nov 01, 2016, 12:51:18 AM
Reply #219 on: Nov 01, 2016, 12:51:18 AM
Yeah, that's not very subtle at all. Looks like a full-fledged gynecological exam cut'n'pasted on top of a rolly polly dressed as a crab.

I mean, it's a good start (the design) but i needs a lot of polishing and revamping. Needs to be more subtle and elegant.

Oh, yes, chestbusters are sooooooo subtle!

I think the original/classic design of the Chestburster is "subtle" in all its phallic beauty. Sure, the later designs (like in A:R) went all out fleshy penis with foreskin and all, I'm not going to deny that, but still, the classic Chestburster was more than a toothed penis despite being, well, a toothed penis.


Kelgaard
Nov 01, 2016, 01:26:41 AM
Reply #220 on: Nov 01, 2016, 01:26:41 AM
Yeah, that's not very subtle at all. Looks like a full-fledged gynecological exam cut'n'pasted on top of a rolly polly dressed as a crab.

I mean, it's a good start (the design) but i needs a lot of polishing and revamping. Needs to be more subtle and elegant.

Oh, yes, chestbusters are sooooooo subtle!

A predictable response.

There a varying degrees of subtlety.  That facehugger has none at all. 


Necronomicon II
Nov 01, 2016, 02:59:31 AM
Reply #221 on: Nov 01, 2016, 02:59:31 AM
Eh it looks dead and probably dissected. I'm fine with some huggers being, ahem, less subtle than others.


Sabres21768
Nov 01, 2016, 03:15:09 AM
Reply #222 on: Nov 01, 2016, 03:15:09 AM
Yeah, that's not very subtle at all. Looks like a full-fledged gynecological exam cut'n'pasted on top of a rolly polly dressed as a crab.

I mean, it's a good start (the design) but i needs a lot of polishing and revamping. Needs to be more subtle and elegant.

Oh, yes, chestbusters are sooooooo subtle!

A predictable response.

There a varying degrees of subtlety.  That facehugger has none at all.

You're right. But I love it.





skhellter
Nov 01, 2016, 11:58:03 AM
Reply #223 on: Nov 01, 2016, 11:58:03 AM
I like that facehugger and egg better than the originals.

Giger had a very "IN YOUR FACE" aesthetic and this is actually more true to that than a lot of designs after the first film.

« Last Edit: Nov 01, 2016, 12:03:23 PM by skhellter »


 

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS Feed