Quote from: HuDaFuK on Mar 02, 2015, 05:34:23 PM
But... you were the one who first used it lol!
Looking at this particular thread, so I am! Ha ha ha ha.. But I'm speaking in broader spectrum of the fandom. I've seen some fans throw that term out there every now and then. Sometimes they word it differently.
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Mar 02, 2015, 05:34:23 PM
Also, as far as RoboCop's concerned, remember it's a satire. The films, the first two in particular, are intentionally over-the-top and not supposed to be taken seriously. That is not the case with the Alien films.
Robocop is a satire in the sense that it is poking fun of corporate America, gentrification, capitalism and consumerism. One of the reasons why the first two were great (assuming you like Robocop 2, I know I did). As for the over-the-top elements, well I would assume that applies mostly for the violence and of course the presentation of the in-universe media and attitude of corporate America.
But why are we talking about Robocop when we're supposed to be talking about Alien? I'll say why... Because I am a strong believer and advocate of having multiple continuities. I don't want Alien 3 to be retconned as nothing more than a dream, I wouldn't want Blomkamp pulling a Bobby Ewing or Roseanne Connor on us. I feel that would be a cheap and insulting cop out. I am probably.. the only person who has expressed that there should be alternate timelines/universes. The reason why I brought up other franchises was to solely point out that alternatives can be brought without plot devices such as time travel or dimensional hopping. Leave time travel to Terminator, and leave dimensional hopping to Marvel, DC and TMNT.
Even if you don't want to explain why we still have Alien 3 and Resurrection, and this new movie doesn't undo them-- it wouldn't be unreasonable to simply explain it as just an alternative path. Forks in the road. I've seen some fans express some apprehensiveness (I want to say distaste but that's too strong a word) for such a thing but I say that gives us fans more power to pick and choose, and no one would say boo about it.
Assuming... that this movie is set directly after Aliens, and ignores Alien 3.. Well, that's all up to Blomkamp. For all we know it could be a stand-alone. Of course I had mentioned that there is a span of twelve days for the Sulaco to get to Fury-161. In a span of twelve days, could anything happen? Possibly.
But if... IF... the movie ignores Alien 3.. but Blomkamp's Word of God says it doesn't undo it.. What other explanation is there?