Where did I supposedly "misinterpret" his words?
Where he said "Fox does not agree" and you take this to mean literally anything other than "Fox does not agree."
Also, the "irrefutable and precious" comment was a summary of how some people have repeatedly spoken of my OP,
I'm not "people", I'm me.
Your argument is weak simply because the reality is the company you're saying treats them all as canon to each other, does not in fact treat them as all canon to each other. If you just removed that one claim -- that the company itself thinks that -- the rest of your OP would be a fine exercise in trying to make it all work. But so long as you attempt to put fallacious words in a company's mouth, it's weak.