I feel like you were really getting somewhere in that now locked thread @TurokSwe
"But his claim that "Fox does not agree" was refuted, as he made it clear he drew that conclusion from how they handled the licenses (rather than having been directly told by Fox how they handle canonical issues). I mean, come on! Also, my argument is not at all weakened merely by your insistence that his words are accurate (they demonstrably aren't, and you are greatly misrepresenting and exaggerating the actual value of his words), and you are still left with the arguments I made in the OP and you still opt to ignore it all and just impose your view unto me instead."
"I'm gonna need a bit of evidence/proof on SM's part."
