User Information

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: More New Concept Art  (Read 20485 times)


Highland
Jun 14, 2012, 02:26:32 PM
Reply #1 on: Jun 14, 2012, 02:26:32 PM
Q
Concept art alway's lets your brain run wild with imagination more so than the final product.

Some great stuff here. 


Valaquen
Jun 14, 2012, 02:30:46 PM
Reply #2 on: Jun 14, 2012, 02:30:46 PM
Q
That Jockey in the chair looks like bad fan-art.



Sexy Poot
Jun 14, 2012, 03:30:59 PM
Reply #4 on: Jun 14, 2012, 03:30:59 PM
Q
Man that jockey looks so much better than what we got.


Samus007
Jun 14, 2012, 03:41:10 PM
Reply #5 on: Jun 14, 2012, 03:41:10 PM
Q
Man that jockey looks so much better than what we got.

If there was one thing I really loved about the movie it was the jockey (engineers).

That Jockey in the chair looks like bad fan-art.

While I think the art is actually good, I agree that he looks meh compared to the final version we got in the film

« Last Edit: Jun 14, 2012, 03:45:02 PM by Samus007 »

NGR01
Jun 14, 2012, 03:51:04 PM
Reply #6 on: Jun 14, 2012, 03:51:04 PM
Q
That Jockey in the chair looks like bad fan-art.

I think a lot of the giger inspired stuff concept art is bad fan art actually.
Especially the Steve Messing stuff...
That cgi Engineer by Neville page is ugly.
cgi renders works great for vehicules but i still prefer 2D artwork for concept art.



lozzy.94
Jun 14, 2012, 04:36:43 PM
Reply #8 on: Jun 14, 2012, 04:36:43 PM
Q
How come concept art always looks better than the movie?


Bat Chain Puller
Jun 14, 2012, 04:45:00 PM
Reply #9 on: Jun 14, 2012, 04:45:00 PM
Q
How come concept art always looks better than the movie?

Because it's cheap to accomplish and requires just one guy who knows what he's doing as opposed to a whole team of people who may or may not know what they are doing attempting to work together under a crushing time limit.


szkoki
Jun 14, 2012, 06:45:07 PM
Reply #10 on: Jun 14, 2012, 06:45:07 PM
Q
is that Noomi??  :D


chupacabras acheronsis
Jun 14, 2012, 09:10:48 PM
Reply #11 on: Jun 14, 2012, 09:10:48 PM
Q
those bulky suits would have helped so much to build a sense of hostility about the alien environment...

i didn't felt that planet to be actually extraterrestrial after the storm. it was a meh setting.


Lostsoul
Jun 14, 2012, 09:42:52 PM
Reply #12 on: Jun 14, 2012, 09:42:52 PM
Q
Man that jockey looks so much better than what we got.

My thoughts exactly.  It looks far better than the Jockey design in the film.
I agree 200% too. Since Alien and Giger's Biomechanics works were not meant to be part of this plan. :'(

How come concept art always looks better than the movie?
Because it's cheap to accomplish and requires just one guy who knows what he's doing as opposed to a whole team of people who may or may not know what they are doing attempting to work together under a crushing time limit.
Fixed: Because it's cheap to accomplish and requires just one guy who knows what he's doing as opposed to a whole team of people who may or may not know what they are doing attempting to work together make money under a crushing time limit.


atlantis
Jun 15, 2012, 03:03:42 AM
Reply #13 on: Jun 15, 2012, 03:03:42 AM
Q
I love these concept art threads..... I feel like back in 1980, as the first magazine's came out and showing more and more pictures from Alien and Giger's art.... excellent..

« Last Edit: Jun 15, 2012, 03:05:44 AM by atlantis »

zakzak
Jun 15, 2012, 03:43:56 AM
Reply #14 on: Jun 15, 2012, 03:43:56 AM
Q
The illustration of the Engineer with its bio-mechanoid skin is fantastic. The movie doesn't show enough of the detailing of the merging of the biological and the mechanical . I always thought it is suit


 

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS Feed