User Information

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Exclusive: More Jockey Images from Prometheus  (Read 62615 times)




nendo
Dec 12, 2011, 08:46:28 PM
Reply #153 on: Dec 12, 2011, 08:46:28 PM
Alright guys, sorry if I let ya down with that last post. But, here some more pics, I still stick with the space jockey idea... and check out the other one... alien egg?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/36021219@N06/6500824421/#

http://www.flickr.com/photos/36021219@N06/6500833703/#in/photostream

It could be a big human because its closer to the camera than the other guy thats jumping towards him.

I would also like to point out these shape are very similar. Outlined in blue




Biomechanoid20
Dec 12, 2011, 09:29:35 PM
Reply #155 on: Dec 12, 2011, 09:29:35 PM
Alright guys, sorry if I let ya down with that last post. But, here some more pics, I still stick with the space jockey idea... and check out the other one... alien egg?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/36021219@N06/6500824421/#

That big ship is an SJ craft similiar to the derelict seen from behind. It has the same roundish double ports or whatever as the one in the original film.


manuel809
Dec 12, 2011, 09:35:16 PM
Reply #156 on: Dec 12, 2011, 09:35:16 PM
you really cant compare cgi from 1999 with todays cg. avatar released in 2009 and the cg only gets better and more realistic.


wmmvrrvrrmm
Dec 12, 2011, 11:12:41 PM
Reply #157 on: Dec 12, 2011, 11:12:41 PM
If someone told me that the so called alien egg was an urn with the top broken open, I might agree with the latter


hardcorps54
Dec 12, 2011, 11:18:30 PM
Reply #158 on: Dec 12, 2011, 11:18:30 PM


It could be a big human because its closer to the camera than the other guy thats jumping towards him.

I would also like to point out these shape are very similar. Outlined in blue



i kinda agree , i havent seen the trailer as i cant find it anywhere but it does look like someone from behind wearing there helmet , plus we are assuming that they are being attacked by the space jockey creature , it could be one of the androids went mental like ash did in alien


ThisBethesdaSea
Dec 13, 2011, 12:41:22 AM
Reply #159 on: Dec 13, 2011, 12:41:22 AM
It looks like that thing burst out of the globe portion of the suit.


Okay...at this point I'm about insane with frustration that we didn't get a trailer today, nor has there been any kind of announcement.

....sigh....


josh_axey
Dec 13, 2011, 12:49:33 AM
Reply #160 on: Dec 13, 2011, 12:49:33 AM
It looks like that thing burst out of the globe portion of the suit.


Okay...at this point I'm about insane with frustration that we didn't get a trailer today, nor has there been any kind of announcement.

....sigh....

+1, i am disappoint.




I hope they announce it this week at least... like "Hey, you're getting a trailer in [insert month here]."


JKS1
Dec 13, 2011, 12:55:48 AM
Reply #161 on: Dec 13, 2011, 12:55:48 AM
If the story is amazing, characters convincing, who cares about the CGI. Bring on Prometheus. No time for whining. ;) :)

I care about the CGI as it has the potential to ruin a movie for me, which is exactly what happened in star wars 1,2,3
I thought 3 had a great plotline, very shakesperean and emotionally involving, yet the CGI and video game look of many scenes ruined the movie for me, despite all the other things that were good about it

(and im not trying to start a star wars thread, its just a good example to illustrate my point)

so yes

i care about too much CGi

maybe you couldnt care less ?

i do, and im not alone

'no time for whining' ?.............cheap, childish jibe..............id expect better from you   ::)

« Last Edit: Dec 13, 2011, 12:57:27 AM by JKS1 »

SM
Dec 13, 2011, 01:07:43 AM
Reply #162 on: Dec 13, 2011, 01:07:43 AM
Quote
I care about the CGI as it has the potential to ruin a movie for me, which is exactly what happened in star wars 1,2,3

While I find the comment about CGI ruining Star Wars laughable - to say "who cares about CGI" is even more laughable.

Bad CGI - not too much - can have a detrimental effect to any film.  Just as much as crappy model or in-camera effects.  One dodgy shot won't wreck an entire film, but if you have consistently sub par effects throughout, convincing characters and an amzing story won't save it.

Not that I think that will happen but there you go.

« Last Edit: Dec 13, 2011, 01:10:09 AM by SM »


SM
Dec 13, 2011, 01:22:32 AM
Reply #164 on: Dec 13, 2011, 01:22:32 AM
Even the two he barely appeared in?  Impressive.


 

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS Feed