User Information

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

Poll

Which movie do you prefer?

Requiem
121 (32.6%)
Resurrection
184 (49.6%)
They are both poor
64 (17.3%)
Love them both
2 (0.5%)

Total Members Voted: 368

Author Topic: AvPR vs A:R  (Read 94449 times)

That Yellow Alien
Apr 29, 2008, 09:23:35 PM
Reply #60 on: Apr 29, 2008, 09:23:35 PM
Q

Atleast AVP and AR had better visual quality and you can see the mother f**king movie and maybe ummm......enjoy it >:(


Seeing Alien Res is the primary problem. If I were blind and deaf I wouldn't mind it. The acting is far worse in A:R and the Newborn is the worst creature in the history of film.

The acting is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay worse in AVPR. At least in A:R there is no "People are dying, we need guns." *blank stare*


RumorControl
Apr 29, 2008, 10:20:59 PM
Reply #61 on: Apr 29, 2008, 10:20:59 PM
Q

Atleast AVP and AR had better visual quality and you can see the mother f**king movie and maybe ummm......enjoy it >:(


Seeing Alien Res is the primary problem. If I were blind and deaf I wouldn't mind it. The acting is far worse in A:R and the Newborn is the worst creature in the history of film.

How many drugs are you on?  Most soap operas are better acted than AvPR, and saying AR has worse acting makes you look like a fool.


Hellspawn28
Apr 29, 2008, 10:40:32 PM
Reply #62 on: Apr 29, 2008, 10:40:32 PM
Q
The acting in 10,000 BC was worst then AVPR. The acting in 10,000 BC made AVPR look like Goodfellas.



Danger Close
Apr 29, 2008, 11:14:55 PM
Reply #64 on: Apr 29, 2008, 11:14:55 PM
Q
I really dislike the direction thar A:R went in. It was really too cheezy to be an Alien film.



Xenomorphine
Apr 30, 2008, 05:03:19 AM
Reply #66 on: Apr 30, 2008, 05:03:19 AM
Q
The acting is far worse in A:R

I'm not one of those who sees much wrong with the recent film's acting. Those in it, so far as I'm concerned, did as well as they could, given the material and direction they had to follow.

But to claim the other film's acting is worse? None of those involved with the production of this one would even try to claim Sigourney Weaver did a bad job on the acting front, to name one example. It was one of her very best performances.


Eidotemit
Apr 30, 2008, 05:39:26 AM
Reply #67 on: Apr 30, 2008, 05:39:26 AM
Q

Atleast AVP and AR had better visual quality and you can see the mother f**king movie and maybe ummm......enjoy it >:(


Seeing Alien Res is the primary problem. If I were blind and deaf I wouldn't mind it. The acting is far worse in A:R and the Newborn is the worst creature in the history of film.

I'm pretty much with Xenomorphine regarding the acting; though I do think even gien the material of AvP:R, the acting was pretty flat.

The newborn, while I strongly dislike it and it taints the rest of the movie for me, was supposed to be an abomination. Chet just looked like garbage because of poor design, not because it was supposed to.


gameoverman
Apr 30, 2008, 06:13:51 AM
Reply #68 on: Apr 30, 2008, 06:13:51 AM
Q
I actually think the actors were pretty good.  That guy who played the pizza boy and Kelly were ok but it was the dialogue they were given and total lack of characterisation that sucked.

Plus, the characters in A:R were pretty badass for the most part - but a pizza boy, a pretty criminal - no.  Kelly, yes, because she was an Iraq vet but Dallas with the predator gun was just cheesy.


Dark Passenger
Apr 30, 2008, 08:46:53 AM
Reply #69 on: Apr 30, 2008, 08:46:53 AM
Q
The acting in 10,000 BC was worst then AVPR. The acting in 10,000 BC made AVPR look like Goodfellas.

are you KIDDING me?? least 10,OOO BC made much more sense thn AVPR... and have to say bella is hawt too

huh? first your talking about the acting then your talking about the movie itself?



Aran
Apr 30, 2008, 12:35:08 PM
Reply #71 on: Apr 30, 2008, 12:35:08 PM
Q
The acting in 10,000 BC was worst then AVPR. The acting in 10,000 BC made AVPR look like Goodfellas.

are you KIDDING me?? least 10,OOO BC made much more sense thn AVPR... and have to say bella is hawt too

The lines in the movie where bad like "We sleep here, we hunt".

dude, its 10,OOO BC. you dont expect ppl in those days to speak PERFECTLY.


Hellspawn28
Apr 30, 2008, 04:57:52 PM
Reply #72 on: Apr 30, 2008, 04:57:52 PM
Q
I know it takes place in the past but Apocalypto and even The Flintstones speak better then 10,000 BC.

In the Name of the King: A Dungeon Siege Tale  had the most worst modren acting ever. It had awesome actors like Jason Statham and the movie was major BS. AVPR is a oscar wining movie compare to In the Name of the King.


Dark Passenger
May 01, 2008, 01:13:10 PM
Reply #73 on: May 01, 2008, 01:13:10 PM
Q
Quote
I know it takes place in the past but Apocalypto and even The Flintstones speak better then 10,000 BC.

When i saw apocalypto they didnt talk any english, and Flinstones isnt the most accurate source..


Shasvre
May 01, 2008, 01:33:26 PM
Reply #74 on: May 01, 2008, 01:33:26 PM
Q
When i saw apocalypto they didnt talk any english, and Flinstones isnt the most accurate source.

Does it matter what language they speak? They still used it in a way that didn't sound fake. To have half sentences like "We sleep here, we hunt" (I haven't seen the movie, so I don't know if it's actually in there) is just stupid. People had their own languages at that time and it was probably more advanced than that.


 

Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS Feed