Quote from: Richman678 on Jan 24, 2008, 08:05:00 PM
Quote from: Eidotemit on Jan 20, 2008, 09:18:46 PM
Don't have any idea what that point is, so I guess you didn't.
Just don't double post or spam
There are rules, read them.
Forum Police! I smell bacon!!!!!!!
Anyways I saw the Alien 3 SE extra features and you have a good point about the super facehugger. Unfortunatly they never showed it in the finished film for theatres. So therefore until they did we cant assume it as truth, however due to a horrible writing staff over the years I feel it will be unlikly they will ever include the super facehugger in this "new lifecycle"
unfortunatly I am guessing they are gonna go with Eidotemit's stupid idea about the molting phase. Technically thanks to their ingenious ways of writing it's the only thing that might make sense.
oh yeah I dont mind if you double post. lot's of other people dont either. It's your thread anyways.
Why am I getting credit for the molting idea? I support it, but I didn't come up with it. The molting theory isn't very different from Alien3's theory either. In his it gets the signal that there is no queen and begins to change shortly before its 'born', in the molt theory the alien is already born and is still able to get the signal to change. Thats a very subtle difference.
Further more, like I said earlier, that this embryo shift draws some questions about the first alien:
Quote from: Eidotemit
Though, this begs the question why didn't the first facehugger bore a queen. I mean if the embryo can sense the absence, it seems facehuggers would too. If not the facehuggers, than the first alien embryo should have also sensed the absence and gained this ability as well.
I do hope the superfacehugger is seen again though.
P.S.: I didn't make the rules about double-posting, its the forums rules.