Posted by joshallan
- Aug 23, 2009, 02:07:00 PMyeah
Posted by Pred Killer
- Aug 19, 2009, 01:58:50 AMThe originals will always reign.
Posted by SM
- Aug 19, 2009, 01:54:38 AMTheir loss.
Posted by DoomRulz
- Aug 19, 2009, 01:53:53 AMTrue. It's not always to convince someone to watch the previous films if they couldn't bare the AvP films though.
Posted by SM
- Aug 19, 2009, 01:51:58 AMAnd be pleasantly surprised.
It's when they watch AvP and don't bother with the originals that it becomes a problem.
It's when they watch AvP and don't bother with the originals that it becomes a problem.
Posted by DoomRulz
- Aug 19, 2009, 01:49:01 AMIt can give the other two a bad image. People will watch the AvP movies, realize how much they suck, and wonder just how good the originals really are.
Posted by Pred Killer
- Aug 19, 2009, 01:13:10 AMQuote from: crazygoji on Aug 17, 2009, 04:26:00 AM
Hell no.
AVP is ruining both franchises.
Three different franchises/storylines/universes.
Posted by Le Celticant
- Aug 19, 2009, 12:36:21 AMNo, it'll never ruin both franchise by the fact the trademark is called ALIENS VERSUS PREDATOR and not ALIEN or PREDATOR even if they might have used both franchise.
A / P will still be great classical, this will never change.
A / P will still be great classical, this will never change.
Posted by crazygoji
- Aug 17, 2009, 04:26:00 AMHell no.
AVP is ruining both franchises.
AVP is ruining both franchises.
Posted by Pred Killer
- Aug 16, 2009, 01:19:41 PMI doubted AvPR, and now I'm doubting this movie...
Posted by PHANTOM
- May 11, 2009, 09:59:25 PMOk ok Sue calm down 
Posted by JamesCameronOnline
- May 11, 2009, 11:01:36 AMPosted by Mustafuk
- May 11, 2009, 08:50:05 AMBy the time there is a serious director,a serious alien atmosphere, serious aliens (alien, there,s no other way), colonial marines (or WY mercenaries, so that we don,t turn the movie into an aliens fake), and the predators ON THE BACKGROUND, this will eventually lead us to a true good avp film, an avp film where stupid/gay ideas coming from one being who suffers from inferiority complex with the women, and some other weird (and stupid too, why not to say It) things coming from the brothers in harms (a predalien/praetorian?, for godness sake 
), have no real place.
Anyway, and this makes me wonder..., is that so difficult to make?, you guys just think on the kind of people at Fox who give the avp projects to beings such as MR Anderson, or the brothers in harms. Isn,t on earth one single director who can think on avp as a serious thing?, why do the avp movies have to suffer from being nothing more than vomitive/non-serious/ movies due to the mentality of their respective directos?
That,s the problem, I can tell It.
), have no real place.Anyway, and this makes me wonder..., is that so difficult to make?, you guys just think on the kind of people at Fox who give the avp projects to beings such as MR Anderson, or the brothers in harms. Isn,t on earth one single director who can think on avp as a serious thing?, why do the avp movies have to suffer from being nothing more than vomitive/non-serious/ movies due to the mentality of their respective directos?
That,s the problem, I can tell It.
Posted by DoomRulz
- May 11, 2009, 02:28:22 AMIt doesn't matter why he places it there. Point is, he liked it.
Posted by Pvt. Hicks
- May 11, 2009, 02:24:05 AMQuote from: Johnny Handsome on May 11, 2009, 02:04:39 AM\
Not only that, but he puts it right behind Aliens as a 3rd place.
Because he has a vendetta against Alien 3 for killing Newt and Hicks, and because he doesn't take it seriously because it's a "video-game movie".
Alien
Aliens
AvP
Alien: Resurrection
Alien 3
Not that hard to believe.
