Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Note: this post will not display until it has been approved by a moderator.
Other options
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by BrokenTusk
 - Mar 13, 2007, 01:45:20 AM
I'm confuse as well, Scarface you care to explain that plz ?
Posted by SM
 - Mar 13, 2007, 01:26:20 AM
wha??  ???
Posted by scarface
 - Mar 13, 2007, 01:12:47 AM
FOX doesnt care about fans, they just want a quick buck and dont care about film art, they put paul such a strict buget, and schedule. He should have given preds more credit but still it went ok with what he went through.

Kinda useless but wanted to get it out.

Parts from comics.

Queen forced to lay eggs
Not knowing whats going on.

Thats all i know of for i have not taken the time to count, but if anyone else knows please tell me.
Posted by BrokenTusk
 - Mar 12, 2007, 05:11:03 PM
neither has my book thread, but w/e that's the hand you're dealt with.

back to topic, I wish they could have fixed the excess mouth slips.
Posted by stickaround
 - Mar 12, 2007, 03:39:48 PM
Absolutely

This subject hasn't really worked out how i wanted but as they say in Pred 2 "Shit appens !"
Posted by BrokenTusk
 - Mar 12, 2007, 12:43:43 AM
still I think the ppl who enjoy the movie and still held a few gripes, should be able to voice their opinion too, don't you agree ?
Posted by stickaround
 - Mar 11, 2007, 11:36:26 PM
It's more of a question for people who didn't like the film to come up with ideas of how they think it could have been done ?

I personally enjoyed it, although i was disappointed a true unrated version wasn't filmed
Posted by BrokenTusk
 - Mar 11, 2007, 01:29:39 AM

Basically, given the same budget as Paul Anderson how would you have done it ?


what if I didn't think the movie needed to be change, except in couple of minor things ?

and since you're the only one who knows what he or she is talking about, maybe you can provide us with an example then ?
Posted by stickaround
 - Mar 10, 2007, 05:05:18 PM
Again, you're completely missing the point and i keep having to repeat myself here !!!

I guess the way i put the subject is confusing people although i have made it pretty clear ! I'm not defending AvP at all, this subject was supposed to be for ideas of how AvP could have been made. Alot of people weren't happy with it so i wanted to know how they would have liked to see it done.

Basically, given the same budget as Paul Anderson how would you have done it ?

This doesn't mean picking apart AvP, saying what you liked / disliked, would have improved upon etc as this was Paul Andersons vision. To use that as a template for how you would have done it and then changing a few things, is slightly contradictory don't you think ? doesn't take a genius to do that !

Posted by Dachande
 - Mar 10, 2007, 12:10:17 AM
Thing is, you cant say what you would improve without saying what was bad... your jumping on the AvP defense again
Posted by stickaround
 - Mar 09, 2007, 11:05:36 PM
SM

The first part of that message referred to your post on the Unrated AvP subject as i think you were expecting me to have a comeback !

Regarding the queen, if you buy the alien quad on dvd and watch the special featrures on aliens you'll see what i'm talking about, i'm not just a pred fan


Posted by stickaround
 - Mar 09, 2007, 10:49:24 PM
Now i hope that wasn't me you were referring to before SM ! When it's a reaonable question and honest answers are given i have no probs with that.

But everyones getting off track here again, this subject was supposed to throw up ideas for AvP films not go over the pros and cons of the first one.

What the hell !
Posted by BrokenTusk
 - Mar 09, 2007, 10:12:23 PM
well I think Ian Whyte did a pretty good job, considering this was one of his first acting performances.

you know if AVP kept the sleek original looking Preds instead of the buff look, we would probably get something like the Mcfarlane AVP toys.(which IMO would have been better)
Posted by Eidotemit
 - Mar 09, 2007, 05:10:28 AM
yeah, like I said, it was done pretty good, just a little slip, doesnt really bother me, but since this a 'what should have been different' thread, I listed it.

Oh yeah, and the preds design should have been like the originals, and their behavior made them seem more like big people with awesome weapons, rather than an alien intergalactic hunter.
Posted by BrokenTusk
 - Mar 09, 2007, 01:33:08 AM
the slip could have been fixed, I didn't notice it at first since I thought the the new face design was pretty cool. It bugs a me a bit, but like you said no biggie.
AvPGalaxy: About | Contact | Cookie Policy | Manage Cookie Settings | Privacy Policy | Legal Info
Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Patreon RSS Feed
Contact: General Queries | Submit News