Quote from: SM on Apr 25, 2012, 10:01:04 AM
And iPhone is still an iPhone though - not matter what the serial number is.
Similarly this seems to be followed with David model androids - i.e they're all called David. At least as far as we can tell so far.
I don't know why a Bishop model would be called Rook. I woulda thought calling it Bishop would tie it even closer to Aliens. And Bishop models could be standard issue for Conestoga class ships.
Well different manufacturers often have different naming conventions.
And comparing with mobile phones shows there isnt that much consistency in product naming. Take Motorola for example they have different names for the exact same phone based on what country they're sold in. Then there's phones like the Defy and Defy+, which are the exact same phone on the outside, but on the inside the Defy+ has some major software and hardware upgrades.
I'm not gonna touch A3's Bishop 2, but Cameron established Ash as a "Hyperdyne 120/A2" according to Burke. Not sure what model Bishop was, other than its implied that he is a more advanced Hyperdyne.
And David7 is Weyland Corp, so they are different manufacturers. Also David's 1 through 7 do have a name change, but only the numeric part. I wonder if the earlier models looked alike?
Or...
Closely related models may share similar aesthetic characteristics. Perhaps the Bishop face was a popular aesthetic, so was carried over into next generation models, which is what Rook is. Or Bishop and Rook may be a sideline of special military variants for support role androids that go under Chess naming conventions, like Knight, Pawn, King dependent on their role?
GBX did say that Rook's role on the Sephora was very different to that of Bishops in ALIENS, so perhaps he is a variant built for a slightly different task?
Personally though, until now, I just always figured Bishop to be his given name that his co-workers use to converse with him. Not his model name.
Really, either ACM's or Damon Lindelof's naming conventions work.