Exclusive: More Jockey Images from Prometheus

[nendo]

But where the **** is a jockey in this picture?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/36021219@N06/6500024633/#

Bottom of the pic. underneath the e. there is a figure.

I believe it to be the flmae thrower guy but other seem to think its the jockey

[invertyourcross]

Alright guys, sorry if I let ya down with that last post. But, here some more pics, I still stick with the space jockey idea... and check out the other one... alien egg?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/36021219@N06/6500824421/#

http://www.flickr.com/photos/36021219@N06/6500833703/#in/photostream

[Never say no to Panda!]

Already...had...them...several times 

[nendo]

Alright guys, sorry if I let ya down with that last post. But, here some more pics, I still stick with the space jockey idea... and check out the other one... alien egg?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/36021219@N06/6500824421/#

http://www.flickr.com/photos/36021219@N06/6500833703/#in/photostream

It could be a big human because its closer to the camera than the other guy thats jumping towards him.

I would also like to point out these shape are very similar. Outlined in blue

[josh_axey]

Already...had...them...several times 

Yup. I posted the "maybe egg" a while ago..

[Biomechanoid20]

Alright guys, sorry if I let ya down with that last post. But, here some more pics, I still stick with the space jockey idea... and check out the other one... alien egg?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/36021219@N06/6500824421/#

That big ship is an SJ craft similiar to the derelict seen from behind. It has the same roundish double ports or whatever as the one in the original film.

[manuel809]

you really cant compare cgi from 1999 with todays cg. avatar released in 2009 and the cg only gets better and more realistic.

[wmmvrrvrrmm]

If someone told me that the so called alien egg was an urn with the top broken open, I might agree with the latter

[hardcorps54]

It could be a big human because its closer to the camera than the other guy thats jumping towards him.

I would also like to point out these shape are very similar. Outlined in blue

http://img684.imageshack.us/img684/9800/prorv.png

i kinda agree , i havent seen the trailer as i cant find it anywhere but it does look like someone from behind wearing there helmet , plus we are assuming that they are being attacked by the space jockey creature , it could be one of the androids went mental like ash did in alien

[ThisBethesdaSea]

It looks like that thing burst out of the globe portion of the suit.


Okay...at this point I'm about insane with frustration that we didn't get a trailer today, nor has there been any kind of announcement.

....sigh....

[josh_axey]

It looks like that thing burst out of the globe portion of the suit.


Okay...at this point I'm about insane with frustration that we didn't get a trailer today, nor has there been any kind of announcement.

....sigh....

+1, i am disappoint.




I hope they announce it this week at least... like "Hey, you're getting a trailer in [insert month here]."

[JKS1]

If the story is amazing, characters convincing, who cares about the CGI. Bring on Prometheus. No time for whining.

I care about the CGI as it has the potential to ruin a movie for me, which is exactly what happened in star wars 1,2,3
I thought 3 had a great plotline, very shakesperean and emotionally involving, yet the CGI and video game look of many scenes ruined the movie for me, despite all the other things that were good about it

(and im not trying to start a star wars thread, its just a good example to illustrate my point)

so yes

i care about too much CGi

maybe you couldnt care less ?

i do, and im not alone

'no time for whining' ?.............cheap, childish jibe..............id expect better from you   

[SM]

I care about the CGI as it has the potential to ruin a movie for me, which is exactly what happened in star wars 1,2,3

While I find the comment about CGI ruining Star Wars laughable - to say "who cares about CGI" is even more laughable.

Bad CGI - not too much - can have a detrimental effect to any film.  Just as much as crappy model or in-camera effects.  One dodgy shot won't wreck an entire film, but if you have consistently sub par effects throughout, convincing characters and an amzing story won't save it.

Not that I think that will happen but there you go.

[Some Mothers Do Have Em!]

It is a well known fact Jar Jar Binks is to blame for ruining the SW prequels.

[SM]

Even the two he barely appeared in?  Impressive.