Started by ace3g, Apr 03, 2017, 01:25:59 AM
Quote from: cliffhanger on Apr 03, 2017, 07:36:41 AMand if i judge those sounds just before right, when looking to the face reaction of it's victim....it sounds like it fits right into the book.....oozing mass coming through a pipe. it sounds like exactly that. which would also explain how it would escape the medbay.
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Apr 03, 2017, 07:34:34 AMThere is no Protomorph. It's just a name coined by Scified for this iteration of the Alien in one of their articles that included the completely false Waltermorph bullshit. It's not a completely different creature. Just a different looking Alien in the same vein as the Runner or the Resurrection Aliens. Just so happens this is likely to be a version that is deliberately missing the biomechanical elements we associate with Giger's Alien.
Quote from: SiL on Apr 03, 2017, 07:10:33 AMWhy would they do a closeup of the Alien's face in CG? Is there no practical alien in this?
Quote from: Adorianu on Apr 03, 2017, 07:46:42 AMSo there are no neomorphs?
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Apr 03, 2017, 07:52:11 AMQuote from: Adorianu on Apr 03, 2017, 07:46:42 AMSo there are no neomorphs? There are Neomorphs and Aliens. Completely different designs and creatures. The Alien is simply the Alien, lacking it's biomechanical elements because it seems like the prequels are leading towards introducing that into the design. They were not, as far as I know, intended to be a completely different creature. The 4chan post that all this Waltermorph and Protomorph stuff was sourced from was complete rubbish.Neomorphs we know are a completely different creature who function in a similar way to the Aliens but are quite specifically different. I know that the Neomorph term was used behind the scenes. I'm also aware that the Aliens in this were referred to as simply Aliens.
Quote from: cliffhanger on Apr 03, 2017, 07:45:20 AMbtw, somebody had to do it
Page created in 0.040 seconds with 13 queries.