Started by Cvalda, Nov 23, 2013, 05:33:45 AM
Quote from: SM on Sep 12, 2014, 03:03:05 AMWhat's "our official stance"?
Quote from: RakaiThwei on Sep 12, 2014, 03:05:44 AMQuote from: SM on Sep 12, 2014, 03:03:05 AMWhat's "our official stance"?Stick with the films?
Quote from: SM on Sep 12, 2014, 03:00:15 AMQuote from: predxeno on Sep 12, 2014, 02:48:24 AMI still don't get why fans never liked bringing Hicks back from the dead, then again no one ever told me. Because he was quite clearly, obviously and irretrievably dead in Alien3, and the manner of his return was possibly the most incomprehensibly bad piece of writiing ever associated with an Alien license. It not only paid no attention to the continuity of the souce material - it paid no attention to its own continuity.
Quote from: predxeno on Sep 12, 2014, 02:48:24 AMI still don't get why fans never liked bringing Hicks back from the dead, then again no one ever told me.
Quote from: SM on Sep 12, 2014, 03:00:15 AMBecause he was quite clearly, obviously and irretrievably dead in Alien3, and the manner of his return was possibly the most incomprehensibly bad piece of writiing ever associated with an Alien license. It not only paid no attention to the continuity of the souce material - it paid no attention to its own continuity.
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Sep 12, 2014, 07:17:41 AMIt really hurts me that people don't like me being back. But I'll get used to it. *considers changing username again*
QuoteBut yeah, it seems of late we're getting a lot of retcons. It seems that Fox is really adverse to trying new things again.
Quote from: Xenomrph on Sep 12, 2014, 07:22:57 AMWhat do you mean?By definition, retcons are shoehorning "new things" into what has come before and then forcing them to fit by making changes.
Quote from: SM on Sep 12, 2014, 07:45:26 AMPossibly because all the new things they've tried in recent years haven't been overly successful?
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Sep 12, 2014, 07:17:41 AMBut yeah, it seems of late we're getting a lot of retcons. It seems that Fox is really adverse to trying new things again.
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Sep 12, 2014, 09:25:12 AMQuote from: Xenomrph on Sep 12, 2014, 07:22:57 AMWhat do you mean?By definition, retcons are shoehorning "new things" into what has come before and then forcing them to fit by making changes. I mean - leaving Ripley alone and not tying everything into the older media.Quote from: SM on Sep 12, 2014, 07:45:26 AMPossibly because all the new things they've tried in recent years haven't been overly successful?True enough. Just takes the right people though.
Quote from: SM on Sep 12, 2014, 12:27:49 PMOut Of The Shadows was much better than it had a right to be.
Quote from: gabgrave on Sep 12, 2014, 09:31:43 AMQuote from: Corporal Hicks on Sep 12, 2014, 07:17:41 AMBut yeah, it seems of late we're getting a lot of retcons. It seems that Fox is really adverse to trying new things again.Fox is jumping in on the Prometheus hype to bring back more Aliens. With the new novels and comics, it's only a matter of time until Alien5.
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Sep 12, 2014, 12:34:34 PMQuote from: SM on Sep 12, 2014, 12:27:49 PMOut Of The Shadows was much better than it had a right to be.It was still hurt by them shoehorning Ripley into it though.