User Information

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Blomkamp's Alien 5 Would Have Been Mo-Capped  (Read 8380 times)

Immortan Jonesy
Jun 14, 2020, 05:45:04 PM
Reply #15 on: Jun 14, 2020, 05:45:04 PM
You mean four-armed one ? It was the closest to Big Chap thing I've ever seen

Yeah, that one was cool. The design was more biomechanical and had jaws similar to those of the Deacon / Neomorph.

But overall I never expected, nor did I ever want to have a zombie-looking mutant in an Alien movie.  :laugh:


SM
Jun 14, 2020, 08:09:10 PM
Reply #16 on: Jun 14, 2020, 08:09:10 PM
Prefer the CG version. Besides wouldnt it have been more complete and polished if it was in the final film?

Wasn't that the final version?

My issue was more the performance.



426Buddy
Jun 14, 2020, 11:24:09 PM
Reply #18 on: Jun 14, 2020, 11:24:09 PM
Prefer the CG version. Besides wouldnt it have been more complete and polished if it was in the final film?

Wasn't that the final version?

My issue was more the performance.

I guess it depends when the decision to cut it was. Don't they work on and improve CG up until release? I always assumed the CG was a work in progress for some reason.


Corporal Hicks
Jun 15, 2020, 09:00:31 AM
Reply #19 on: Jun 15, 2020, 09:00:31 AM
Speaking just in terms of the design, and not the execution/type of effect, I prefer the scrapped version.

Assuming you're talking the Fifield monster, that's a better way of putting it. I definitely prefer the design of the CGI version, but I don't believe they ever actually finished work on the CG effect.


426Buddy
Jun 15, 2020, 10:57:44 PM
Reply #20 on: Jun 15, 2020, 10:57:44 PM
Speaking just in terms of the design, and not the execution/type of effect, I prefer the scrapped version.

Assuming you're talking the Fifield monster, that's a better way of putting it. I definitely prefer the design of the CGI version, but I don't believe they ever actually finished work on the CG effect.

This is what I was talking about, I feel the same.



Kane's other son
Jun 17, 2020, 04:51:09 PM
Reply #22 on: Jun 17, 2020, 04:51:09 PM
The CG Fifield looked great but moved like a chimp. The sub-par animation killed that version of the character


Local Trouble
Jun 17, 2020, 04:54:44 PM
Reply #23 on: Jun 17, 2020, 04:54:44 PM
Just another reason to hate Fifield.


Drukathi
Jun 17, 2020, 06:30:33 PM
Reply #24 on: Jun 17, 2020, 06:30:33 PM
HEY! He is the space dwarf-viking! Don't hate him! :D



Drukathi
Jun 17, 2020, 06:44:35 PM
Reply #26 on: Jun 17, 2020, 06:44:35 PM
Unlike people, stones have a serious reason...


Immortan Jonesy
Jun 18, 2020, 04:30:02 AM
Reply #27 on: Jun 18, 2020, 04:30:02 AM
Moral of the story: Don't smoke "tobacco", or you're going to end up as Fifield.



Immortan Jonesy
Jun 19, 2020, 11:43:22 PM
Reply #29 on: Jun 19, 2020, 11:43:22 PM
Then maybe the only real part of the movie is everything before the "tobacco" scene. The other part is half real, half trip.



Moral of the story: Don't mixt THC with Black goo.


 

Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube RSS Feed