Has anyone ever had an interest in eschatology? Basically that's the destiny of humans or end outcome.
I was thinking we exist forever, although you can lose everything you know and that is enough to make you not the same person.
Except for what is permanent, there is no certainty of anything.
About freewill, I believe regardless if it can be defined, or aproximated and simulated, that when compared to simply accepting perception of freewill, no freewill, and everything inbetween, that even if one showed a better quality of life over an amount of time, with more time, the other would equal or exceed the other, and this could keep changing without answer or pattern. The question of having freewill or not, and which is better, is irrelevant, but knowing you can't do better than happenstance seems good to me.
One last thing I want to talk about is what I call the "continuation fantasy," and that is what it sounds like, dying but not losing it all. Specifically, this is regarding how you would handle a nuanced moral dilemma. There will be situations that you can't absolutely alter or prevent from presenting again, but, a finite amount of suffering from you may spare others from finite suffering and may lead to a good outcome or reward, if nothing else, it did spare others pain. But, in the context of forever, and no lessening to the frequency of this occurrence, and of continuation, would it effect your willingness to keep making the same choice? And the other interpretation, which just finds even engaging in undesirable situations undesirable, and it is felt there is a non negligable chance engaging them will result in experiencing more of them, so you wouldn't suffer for others.
Just thoughts I had when taking a walk today.
