Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Note: this post will not display until it has been approved by a moderator.
Other options
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Perfect-Organism
 - Jun 20, 2020, 02:11:44 AM
It would explain how the boy with the mapping equipment got lost.
Posted by Immortan Jonesy
 - Jun 19, 2020, 11:43:22 PM
Then maybe the only real part of the movie is everything before the "tobacco" scene. The other part is half real, half trip.



Moral of the story: Don't mixt THC with Black goo.
Posted by Perfect-Organism
 - Jun 18, 2020, 01:03:18 PM
There's no way that was tobacco.
Posted by Immortan Jonesy
 - Jun 18, 2020, 04:30:02 AM
Moral of the story: Don't smoke "tobacco", or you're going to end up as Fifield.
Posted by Drukathi
 - Jun 17, 2020, 06:44:35 PM
Unlike people, stones have a serious reason...
Posted by Local Trouble
 - Jun 17, 2020, 06:36:09 PM
Posted by Drukathi
 - Jun 17, 2020, 06:30:33 PM
HEY! He is the space dwarf-viking! Don't hate him! :D
Posted by Local Trouble
 - Jun 17, 2020, 04:54:44 PM
Just another reason to hate Fifield.
Posted by Kane's other son
 - Jun 17, 2020, 04:51:09 PM
The CG Fifield looked great but moved like a chimp. The sub-par animation killed that version of the character
Posted by Immortan Jonesy
 - Jun 15, 2020, 11:15:37 PM
CG Fifield is teaser quality.
Posted by 426Buddy
 - Jun 15, 2020, 10:57:44 PM
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Jun 15, 2020, 09:00:31 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 14, 2020, 05:26:34 PM
Speaking just in terms of the design, and not the execution/type of effect, I prefer the scrapped version.

Assuming you're talking the Fifield monster, that's a better way of putting it. I definitely prefer the design of the CGI version, but I don't believe they ever actually finished work on the CG effect.

This is what I was talking about, I feel the same.
Posted by Corporal Hicks
 - Jun 15, 2020, 09:00:31 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 14, 2020, 05:26:34 PM
Speaking just in terms of the design, and not the execution/type of effect, I prefer the scrapped version.

Assuming you're talking the Fifield monster, that's a better way of putting it. I definitely prefer the design of the CGI version, but I don't believe they ever actually finished work on the CG effect.
Posted by 426Buddy
 - Jun 14, 2020, 11:24:09 PM
Quote from: SM on Jun 14, 2020, 08:09:10 PM
Quote from: 426Buddy on Jun 14, 2020, 11:31:13 AM
Prefer the CG version. Besides wouldnt it have been more complete and polished if it was in the final film?

Wasn't that the final version?

My issue was more the performance.

I guess it depends when the decision to cut it was. Don't they work on and improve CG up until release? I always assumed the CG was a work in progress for some reason.
Posted by Perfect-Organism
 - Jun 14, 2020, 09:00:14 PM
Quote from: j0nesy on Jun 13, 2020, 11:38:04 PM
i agree! though i would have liked to see more of a complete version of the cg monster



This was creepy AF.  It would have been preferred.
Posted by SM
 - Jun 14, 2020, 08:09:10 PM
Quote from: 426Buddy on Jun 14, 2020, 11:31:13 AM
Prefer the CG version. Besides wouldnt it have been more complete and polished if it was in the final film?

Wasn't that the final version?

My issue was more the performance.
AvPGalaxy: About | Contact | Cookie Policy | Manage Cookie Settings | Privacy Policy | Legal Info
Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Patreon RSS Feed
Contact: General Queries | Submit News