I'd like to thanks the anonymous contributor that provided these pictures to the convention at weekend and that has just sent me some of them to put online:
[Images Removed At Request Of Fox]
As you can see it looks suspiciously like the Space Jockey chair without the telescope (or whatever it is) device attached. However, the 2nd picture looks like a telescope device.
Pretty much seals the deal. Thanks.
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Sep 29, 2011, 06:23:21 AM
As you can see it looks suspiciously like the Space Jockey chair without the telescope (or whatever it is) device attached. However, the 2nd picture looks like a telescope device.
Probably just disassembled it. Also the top pic shows the chair torn apart slightly and thus you can see the foam.
Also no creature. Maybe he took a poo-poo break.
Looks incredibly similar to the original chair.
Excitement level just peaked back up from the drop in news recently.
EDIT: Only thing missing is the pipes up the side, leading to the "scope like" piece. Probably why the foam is visible in one spot I guess. Not applied yet / recently removed.
Quote from: josh_axey on Sep 29, 2011, 06:42:13 AM
Only thing missing is the pipes up the side, leading to the "scope like" piece. Probably why the foam is visible in one spot I guess. Not applied yet / recently removed.
Recently removed would be my bet.
There are some very minor differences, but the similarity to the original is quite remarkable.
The fact the occupant is absent may point to them not being grown out of the chair as Dallas speculated.
Quote from: SM on Sep 29, 2011, 06:51:25 AM
There are some very minor differences, but the similarity to the original is quite remarkable.
The fact the occupant is absent may point to them not being grown out of the chair as Dallas speculated.
x2
Although one would assume that the animatronic suit would also need to adapt into it, if the "jockey" was to be portrayed by a person for speech, movement, etc.
So... could also be why "it's" missing.
Possibly.
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Sep 29, 2011, 06:23:21 AM
... just sent me some of them to put online...
Quoth the Raven "moar!"
(Bribe him/her!)
The fact that the creature isn't sculpted with the chair rules out this pic coming from Alien (1979), as what some posters in that other thread would suggest otherwise.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1101.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fg425%2Fmrmagoo6%2Fjockey1-1.jpg&hash=cd60287838f6d0925f39fa7d7c34637ca2968677)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1101.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fg425%2Fmrmagoo6%2Fphotosfromfilms-1.jpg&hash=e5e8077f0f984e76f36ba791184c887f5c43ef41)
8)
Finally something with some meaty bits.
I am pleased.
to me it appears this may be a .....DIFFERENT JOCKEY? look at the new images and the lack of pipes and greeblies. could there possibly be more then one?
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi274.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fjj241%2FRabbit2100%2Fjockey1-1copy.jpg&hash=b8c40c597f9f49cb0cd4a23e624c095ff0a81a8c)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi274.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fjj241%2FRabbit2100%2Fphotosfromfilms-1copy.jpg&hash=33e9e150db86df1216cf322c07c13030b7cc65b5)
Quote from: Byohzrd on Sep 29, 2011, 09:27:41 AM
to me it appears this may be a .....DIFFERENT JOCKEY? look at the new images and the lack of pipes and greeblies. could there possibly be more then one?
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi274.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fjj241%2FRabbit2100%2Fjockey1-1copy.jpg&hash=b8c40c597f9f49cb0cd4a23e624c095ff0a81a8c)
http://i274.photobucket.com/albums/jj241/Rabbit2100/photosfromfilms-1copy.jpg
I hope so. Different Jockey, different story, looser tie to Alien. Which means the film doesn't exist simply to set the derelict on the planetoid.
Quote from: Byohzrd on Sep 29, 2011, 09:27:41 AM
to me it appears this may be a .....DIFFERENT JOCKEY? look at the new images and the lack of pipes and greeblies. could there possibly be more then one?
This instrument could be from a different jockey ship that we haven't seen, but the design looks very much like the one in the '79 movie minus the vertical pipes and ridges. I bet those vertical pipes were just yanked off during the dismantling process but they do exist somewhere- just not in those pics.
Quote from: Byohzrd on Sep 29, 2011, 09:27:41 AM
to me it appears this may be a .....DIFFERENT JOCKEY? look at the new images and the lack of pipes and greeblies. could there possibly be more then one?
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi274.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fjj241%2FRabbit2100%2Fjockey1-1copy.jpg&hash=b8c40c597f9f49cb0cd4a23e624c095ff0a81a8c)
http://i274.photobucket.com/albums/jj241/Rabbit2100/photosfromfilms-1copy.jpg
I think this is the chair and on the other side is the telescope.
Just a thought, but what if it's not a telescope but some sort of cannon that launches the egg/cylinder shaped objects into new planets.
Basically it fires a cocktail of life....
Quote from: Highland on Sep 29, 2011, 10:40:21 AM
Just a thought, but what if it's not a telescope but some sort of cannon that launches the egg/cylinder shaped objects into new planets.
Basically it fires a cocktail of life....
So it's a giant dick?
Not a far stretch, considering Alien.
^^ Then I'd say that would be in line with the existing phallic themes of the franchise
Ooh that sounds really obscene come to think of it. LOL beat me to it Valaquen
Yess but nothing new right? ive been watching this jocky pic for like 30 years now. :laugh:
Nothing new design-wise. But the implications are humongous ;D
Not a 100% convinced this is real. But if it is i'm pleased 8)
Quote from: Snowdog on Sep 29, 2011, 11:31:22 AM
Not a 100% convinced this is real. But if it is i'm pleased 8)
You think someone built this in their basement to fool us? :laugh:
Quote from: Valaquen on Sep 29, 2011, 11:33:28 AM
Quote from: Snowdog on Sep 29, 2011, 11:31:22 AM
Not a 100% convinced this is real. But if it is i'm pleased 8)
You think someone built this in their basement to fool us? :laugh:
I did.
Quote from: Snowdog on Sep 29, 2011, 11:31:22 AM
Not a 100% convinced this is real. But if it is i'm pleased 8)
LOL. I know the feel. Last year when my hometown baseball team won the world series, EXACTLY how I felt
If you look at the pilot photo, the area around the head and forearms is missing. We discussed at the Prometheus panel at the Aliens NSC 25th, that these areas were kept blank for either a digital or animatronic head and forearms.
Quote from: RustiSwordz on Sep 29, 2011, 11:41:14 AM
If you look at the pilot photo, the area around the head and forearms is missing. We discussed at the Prometheus panel at the Aliens NSC 25th, that these areas were kept blank for either a digital or animatronic head and forearms.
Which is to imply that the body is there, but I don't see it. Too much lens flare. But I ain't hatin
Quote from: RustiSwordz on Sep 29, 2011, 11:41:14 AM
If you look at the pilot photo, the area around the head and forearms is missing. We discussed at the Prometheus panel at the Aliens NSC 25th, that these areas were kept blank for either a digital or animatronic head and forearms.
I couldn't see the Jockey in the picture (I am badly sighted, though...) Maybe the chair is meant to be encountered empty? It would play on our expectations a bit.
Quote from: Snowdog on Sep 29, 2011, 11:31:22 AM
Not a 100% convinced this is real. But if it is i'm pleased 8)
Ive been to Pinewood on and off over the years, that is the inside wall of one of the sound stages behind the Jockey. Its not fake.
Well, I suppose we can start asking more questions about whether the space jockey can separate itself from the seat or not
Maybe the material is plaster, and the vertical tubes are aluminum (strong and light enough to support the scope which may or may not be a gigantic space penis)
Quote from: wmmvrrvrrmm on Sep 29, 2011, 12:06:37 PM
Well, I suppose we can start asking more questions about whether the space jockey can separate itself from the seat or not
My answer to that is: I don't think it matters. I'm sure Ridley & Co. will make it all work somehow.
Right on! Those are awesome guys!
Quote from: NUB DESTROYER on Sep 29, 2011, 12:13:27 PM
Quote from: wmmvrrvrrmm on Sep 29, 2011, 12:06:37 PM
Well, I suppose we can start asking more questions about whether the space jockey can separate itself from the seat or not
My answer to that is: I don't think it matters. I'm sure Ridley & Co. will make it all work somehow.
well, in a way nothing really matters
Those pictures are amazing! This is my #1 film to see in 2012.
Quote from: Valaquen on Sep 29, 2011, 10:46:09 AM
Quote from: Highland on Sep 29, 2011, 10:40:21 AM
Just a thought, but what if it's not a telescope but some sort of cannon that launches the egg/cylinder shaped objects into new planets.
Basically it fires a cocktail of life....
So it's a giant dick?
Not a far stretch, considering Alien.
Wait what?! A giant dick?! What is it doing, pumping the seed of life constantly into the universe. I bloody hope this is not the case.
So Prometheus is a metaphor for stealing God's sperm, which for all intents and purposes is rape.
Frikkin' obscene, please make it happen Riddles.
Quote from: Valaquen on Sep 29, 2011, 09:30:00 AM
I hope so. Different Jockey, different story, looser tie to Alien. Which means the film doesn't exist simply to set the derelict on the planetoid.
Dallas said the original appeared fossilized. I was always under the assumption that the derelict was an ancient thing. So me it makes more sense that this is a different chair for a different jockey. Prometheus takes place too closely in the timeline for anything else to make sense.
Anyone noticed that the markings on the Jockey scopes are almost the same too? Looks awesome!
NOW we are talking!
Like the redesign by now allot. Total Giger and still not just a re-brew. WIN!
Quote from: Ash 937 on Sep 29, 2011, 02:46:50 PM
Quote from: Valaquen on Sep 29, 2011, 09:30:00 AM
I hope so. Different Jockey, different story, looser tie to Alien. Which means the film doesn't exist simply to set the derelict on the planetoid.
Dallas said the original appeared fossilized. I was always under the assumption that the derelict was an ancient thing. So me it makes more sense that this is a different chair for a different jockey. Prometheus takes place too closely in the timeline for anything else to make sense.
Lindelof's time travel tropes should address the fossilised aspect, if this movie is an actual prequel.
Isn't there a pic in the leaked ComiCon footage that shows a hand on or near a long object reminiscent of the jockey gun or something?
"Jockey-gun"??
Canon? whatever that long telescope like thing the jockey has his/her hands on in A L I E N?
Both images come together very well to form what we see in ALIEN....looking good.
Quote from: ThisBethesdaSea on Sep 29, 2011, 03:29:07 PM
Isn't there a pic in the leaked ComiCon footage that shows a hand on or near a long object reminiscent of the jockey gun or something?
I remember that although I'm not sure if anyone really in the end was so sure what it was other than a human like hand on some apparatus with lights on it. We'll see.
Quote from: Kev Loaf on Sep 29, 2011, 01:26:34 PM
Quote from: Valaquen on Sep 29, 2011, 10:46:09 AM
Quote from: Highland on Sep 29, 2011, 10:40:21 AM
Just a thought, but what if it's not a telescope but some sort of cannon that launches the egg/cylinder shaped objects into new planets.
Basically it fires a cocktail of life....
So it's a giant dick?
Not a far stretch, considering Alien.
Wait what?! A giant dick?! What is it doing, pumping the seed of life constantly into the universe. I bloody hope this is not the case.
Considering it was designed by Giger, I found it rather tame...though I find it difficult to rationalize that you've gone through life without realizing that the Space Jockey was actually staring up through a gigantic, erect, flayed penis...
...we won't talk about the split glans ('bell-end', for our younger viewers)
Quote from: Byohzrd on Sep 29, 2011, 09:27:41 AM
to me it appears this may be a .....DIFFERENT JOCKEY? look at the new images and the lack of pipes and greeblies. could there possibly be more then one?
Yeah, I brought up that possibility at the panel. The environment, looks similar but different. Looks like stone to me. I think it's a completely different place.
Quote from: Snowdog on Sep 29, 2011, 11:31:22 AM
Not a 100% convinced this is real. But if it is i'm pleased 8)
Why don't people here trust me?
Well I guess this confirms the alien prequelness of it all for those insane people still in doubt. I say people... person
Hello everybody, I read that the Space Jockey was recreated to look like the original so basically we will be seing the Jockey on the ship alive, so its a pretty good chance this will be set within the original ship found in Alien. I'm pretty sure its the same Jockey we are just going to see it's back story, and yes as a sculptor and model maker I noticed the comparrison pics of the original Jockey and the replica that had some differences but when its on film no one would notice only us rivet counters ;D.
Quote from: Glaive on Sep 29, 2011, 04:05:07 PM
Quote from: Kev Loaf on Sep 29, 2011, 01:26:34 PM
Quote from: Valaquen on Sep 29, 2011, 10:46:09 AM
Quote from: Highland on Sep 29, 2011, 10:40:21 AM
Just a thought, but what if it's not a telescope but some sort of cannon that launches the egg/cylinder shaped objects into new planets.
Basically it fires a cocktail of life....
So it's a giant dick?
Not a far stretch, considering Alien.
Wait what?! A giant dick?! What is it doing, pumping the seed of life constantly into the universe. I bloody hope this is not the case.
Considering it was designed by Giger, I found it rather tame...though I find it difficult to rationalize that you've gone through life without realizing that the Space Jockey was actually staring up through a gigantic, erect, flayed penis...
...we won't talk about the split glans ('bell-end', for our younger viewers)
HUH?! Has someone who actually made the film or designed the creature actually come out and said it was a "gigantic, erect, flayed penis"?!
That is insane. Why can you guys not imagine it to be a telescope or a cannon, why does everything have to be turned into something erotic?! :D
Quote from: Kev Loaf on Sep 29, 2011, 04:38:11 PM
That is insane. Why can you guys not imagine it to be a telescope or a cannon, why does everything have to be turned into something erotic?! :D
Because Giger that's why!
Biomechanical sexual art. That's the basis of the alien creature itself and the derelict. That's what it is.
from kev loaf: "Why can you guys not imagine it to be a telescope or a cannon, why does everything have to be turned into something erotic?!" ...because that's what it is. Look at all of Geiger's biomechanoid artwork and you will see constant thingly veiled allegories for genitals and intercourse. Nothing wrong with it. Why is that such a shock?
Also it is clearly a space jockey chair without the jockey. Literally all of the sculpture details other than the missing pipes along the base of the gun/phallus and the Jockey itself match either exactly or as small redesigns that no one but people on this board would notice. Unless this thing was home made (which I highly doubt), it is the definite confirmation of a SJ built for the film.
Quote from: ThisBethesdaSea on Sep 29, 2011, 04:49:56 PM
Biomechanical sexual art. That's the basis of the alien creature itself and the derelict. That's what it is.
And that's what i truly love about it 8)
About the missing pipes and features: The sculpture might be incomplete? :-\
I was going through the comments on the previous page and the language is pretty harsh :laugh:
If an Alien movie doesn't have indirect erotic references, it is not a worthy Alien movie.
I hope Jockeys do not walk or run or move at all. ;)
I always like to believe that the SJ was permanently fused to the chair and that it was some form of biomech pilot created by another, yet unseen, intelligent life form! Therefore, the SJ was a creation like the Xenos by some other mysterious race.
That would be awesome.
The picture was taken during the period the set was being destroyed. There did appear to be some sort of body within the suit but space for a head and arms which led us to believe they maybe CG.
Even if this only appears in the last minute of the film it's enough to bring a tear to my eye. The beauty of Giger's aesthetic is back, matched with Ridley's artistic eye. Gone is the greasy brown turd of what the alien had become by A:R. This is fantastic.
Makes sense that it is CG the SJ would need to move it head and body around smoothly.
I'm convinced it is fused to the chair!
Quote from: Kev Loaf on Sep 29, 2011, 04:38:11 PM
Quote from: Glaive on Sep 29, 2011, 04:05:07 PM
Quote from: Kev Loaf on Sep 29, 2011, 01:26:34 PM
Quote from: Valaquen on Sep 29, 2011, 10:46:09 AM
Quote from: Highland on Sep 29, 2011, 10:40:21 AM
Just a thought, but what if it's not a telescope but some sort of cannon that launches the egg/cylinder shaped objects into new planets.
Basically it fires a cocktail of life....
So it's a giant dick?
Not a far stretch, considering Alien.
Wait what?! A giant dick?! What is it doing, pumping the seed of life constantly into the universe. I bloody hope this is not the case.
Considering it was designed by Giger, I found it rather tame...though I find it difficult to rationalize that you've gone through life without realizing that the Space Jockey was actually staring up through a gigantic, erect, flayed penis...
...we won't talk about the split glans ('bell-end', for our younger viewers)
HUH?! Has someone who actually made the film or designed the creature actually come out and said it was a "gigantic, erect, flayed penis"?!
That is insane. Why can you guys not imagine it to be a telescope or a cannon, why does everything have to be turned into something erotic?! :D
http://www.virginmedia.com/images/alien-5-rumours-space-jockeys-590x350.jpg (http://www.virginmedia.com/images/alien-5-rumours-space-jockeys-590x350.jpg)
I'm, sorry...It looks NOTHING like a phallus...
Gah, I don't know what came over me...
(...but it
might of been a "gigantic, erect, flayed penis with split glans..." )
Quote from: Kev Loaf on Sep 29, 2011, 05:18:23 PM
I always like to believe that the SJ was permanently fused to the chair and that it was some form of biomech pilot created by another, yet unseen, intelligent life form! Therefore, the SJ was a creation like the Xenos by some other mysterious race.
That would be awesome.
I had something similar in mind. But I guess that the SJs surgically attached themselves to different stuff, in Alien's case, the ship. So there could be those normal Jockeys that could, well walk around, while some others could be half-machines, that are restricted to the vicinity of the thing they are connected to.
Or they could attach and detach themselves from machines, whenever they wanted to.
I'm not sure SJs were organisms created by other organisms. Xenomorphs could be, but SJs, being the advanced race they are, seem to have altered their bodies to their needs.
so damn happy about this. Even if the tie in comes at the end, or whatever, it's gonna be there. this is a great time for alien fans!
Quote from: The Xenoborg on Sep 29, 2011, 05:52:22 PM
Quote from: Kev Loaf on Sep 29, 2011, 05:18:23 PM
I always like to believe that the SJ was permanently fused to the chair and that it was some form of biomech pilot created by another, yet unseen, intelligent life form! Therefore, the SJ was a creation like the Xenos by some other mysterious race.
That would be awesome.
I had something similar in mind. But I guess that the SJs surgically attached themselves to different stuff, in Alien's case, the ship. So there could be those normal Jockeys that could, well walk around, while some others could be half-machines, that are restricted to the vicinity of the thing they are connected to.
Or they could attach and detach themselves from machines, whenever they wanted to.
I'm not sure SJs were organisms created by other organisms. Xenomorphs could be, but SJs, being the advanced race they are, seem to have altered their bodies to their needs.
Someone NEEDS to Photoshop a Space Jockey on a Segway, STAT!
Quote from: Kev Loaf on Sep 29, 2011, 04:38:11 PM
Quote from: Glaive on Sep 29, 2011, 04:05:07 PM
Quote from: Kev Loaf on Sep 29, 2011, 01:26:34 PM
Quote from: Valaquen on Sep 29, 2011, 10:46:09 AM
Quote from: Highland on Sep 29, 2011, 10:40:21 AM
Just a thought, but what if it's not a telescope but some sort of cannon that launches the egg/cylinder shaped objects into new planets.
Basically it fires a cocktail of life....
So it's a giant dick?
Not a far stretch, considering Alien.
Wait what?! A giant dick?! What is it doing, pumping the seed of life constantly into the universe. I bloody hope this is not the case.
Considering it was designed by Giger, I found it rather tame...though I find it difficult to rationalize that you've gone through life without realizing that the Space Jockey was actually staring up through a gigantic, erect, flayed penis...
...we won't talk about the split glans ('bell-end', for our younger viewers)
HUH?! Has someone who actually made the film or designed the creature actually come out and said it was a "gigantic, erect, flayed penis"?!
That is insane. Why can you guys not imagine it to be a telescope or a cannon, why does everything have to be turned into something erotic?! :D
Its Space Jockey envy ;)
Pictures are down.
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Sep 29, 2011, 07:24:53 PM
Pictures are down.
As of a minute ago still on Google and PrometheusFilmNews (complete with AvPGalaxy banner!).
Grab ém while you can!!
Glad I saw em' and saved em! :) :)
Fox, get your act together and start promoting this film and shit like this won't happen. Y'all ain't doin ANYTHING in respects to this film. :)
Hope someone can post them pics again I missed them :-[ Damn FOX is fast, they must have been real then, BRILLIANT find Hicks!!
Good thing I was able to see them before Fox took them. Looks good as always.
Quote from: RoaryUK on Sep 29, 2011, 08:19:36 PM
Damn FOX is fast, they must have been real then, BRILLIANT find Hicks!!
There are
207 Guests, 53 Users now. I bet half of those guests are people who actually worked on Prometheus and are just trying to figure out what their movie is about.
Could it be a penis?
Daft as it might sound, and based on Gigars own wacky (to say the least) sense of surrealism, I wouldn't be supprised if the 'canon' thing actually fired Alien eggs ;D
Or maybe those urns. They look like they can remain intact while they're being hurtled through space and time.
Quote from: NUB DESTROYER on Sep 29, 2011, 09:14:44 PM
Or maybe those urns. They look like they can remain intact while they're being hurtled through space and time.
Actually yeah I take that back, probably won't be eggs in this movie as discussed some time back, those urns do seem perfect for it... maybe we are onto something and dont even know it!!
It's all speculative still, but why not. Imagine when the real trailer hits, this place is gonna blow up.
Quote from: NUB DESTROYER on Sep 29, 2011, 09:30:44 PM
It's all speculative still, but why not. Imagine when the real trailer hits, this place is gonna blow up.
Indeed. And that telescope/canon thing has gotta be good for something, rather than just some kind of antennae I imagined all those years ago
I've got a full-colour picture looking down the split glans of the telecope/whatever...it has multiple holes between the two flayed flaps, I took it for multiple lenses for this alien 'telescope' for a time...
The film,however, NEVER showed this aparatus from an angle we could SEE these holes...
Perhaps, Ridley is happy he had an artist that could enlarge his vision between canvas and full-sized sculpture...and it is serendipitous that something Giger added to a model on a sound-stage might have sparked Prometheus.
Ridley Scott (1978)..."I LOVE the Space Jockey...but it's going to be twice as expensive to build this telescope..."
HR Giger..."But you muzt!...Ozerwise Jockey make NO sense!...and iz OBVIUZLY not TELESCOPE!..Iz PLANET INZEMINATOR!!!"
...I'm pretty sure THAT's the way it went down.
Can we repost those pics as an embed in this topic or are they strictly off limits?
Quote from: NUB DESTROYER on Sep 29, 2011, 09:14:44 PM
Or maybe those urns. They look like they can remain intact while they're being hurtled through space and time.
That's what I meant.
Because if I remember from the other set leaks, the chamber with the urns sit's directly below the head, which again looked like where the Jockey ship would sit.
So going on my Penis theory......
One set of eggs to start life.
One set of eggs to destroy it.
Quote from: Highland on Sep 29, 2011, 10:38:02 PM
One set of eggs to start life.
One set of eggs to destroy it.
Interesting idea.
Quote from: ThisBethesdaSea on Sep 29, 2011, 10:33:16 PM
Can we repost those pics as an embed in this topic or are they strictly off limits?
I'm pretty sure THAT would be a negative...purely on relooking at other picture heavy threads and seeing a barren wasteland...
Quote from: Highland on Sep 29, 2011, 10:38:02 PM
Quote from: NUB DESTROYER on Sep 29, 2011, 09:14:44 PM
Or maybe those urns. They look like they can remain intact while they're being hurtled through space and time.
That's what I meant.
Because if I remember from the other set leaks, the chamber with the urns sit's directly below the head, which again looked like where the Jockey ship would sit.
So going on my Penis theory......
One set of eggs to start life.
One set of eggs to destroy it.
The SJs should of invested heavily in the 'Genesis Device'...they could of gotten a 'two-for'!
Image taken Down... FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
Does anyone check the sticky anymore?
Quote from: JaaayDee on Sep 30, 2011, 03:04:52 AM
Does anyone check the sticky anymore?
Only the cool kids like me ;)
Trying to remove those pics is pointless. The second it hits the net, its there forever
i've got one, but somehow arrived too late for the other.
the hunt begins.
Be fast:
http://www.joblo.com/images_arrownews/prometheus-jockey1.jpg (http://www.joblo.com/images_arrownews/prometheus-jockey1.jpg)
http://www.joblo.com/images_arrownews/prometheus-jockey2.jpg (http://www.joblo.com/images_arrownews/prometheus-jockey2.jpg)
thanks, comrade.
Quote from: locusta on Sep 30, 2011, 05:23:26 AM
Be fast:
http://www.joblo.com/images_arrownews/prometheus-jockey1.jpg (http://www.joblo.com/images_arrownews/prometheus-jockey1.jpg)
http://www.joblo.com/images_arrownews/prometheus-jockey2.jpg (http://www.joblo.com/images_arrownews/prometheus-jockey2.jpg)
Cheers man your the best!!
Quote from: locusta on Sep 30, 2011, 05:23:26 AM
Be fast:
http://www.joblo.com/images_arrownews/prometheus-jockey1.jpg (http://www.joblo.com/images_arrownews/prometheus-jockey1.jpg)
http://www.joblo.com/images_arrownews/prometheus-jockey2.jpg (http://www.joblo.com/images_arrownews/prometheus-jockey2.jpg)
Thanks mate!
over on imdb these pics have sparked a big debate with pretty much everyone coming to the conclusion that they are not from prometheus. yet no one has shown any proof that proves the pics aren't from the new movie.
Quote from: BonesawT101 on Sep 30, 2011, 09:54:49 AM
over on imdb these pics have sparked a big debate with pretty much everyone coming to the conclusion that they are not from prometheus. yet no one has shown any proof that proves the pics aren't from the new movie.
IMDB is the equivalent of a nagging wife. If you say black, they say white.
If they are fake, someone deserves a medal. From memory the scale looked real to me. Although there was no reference in the pictures.
The fact they have been removed also suggests they are at least causing a concern.
alot of crap certainly goes on at IMDB, hope these are the real deal man
Quote from: Highland on Sep 30, 2011, 10:01:16 AM
The fact they have been removed also suggests they are at least causing a concern.
They were in fact moved within a few hours of posting I believe.... so someone thought they were important !!
Also with a product that size there would be some form of information in relation to it.
p.s its not the original as the design is different... slightly
http://geektyrant.com/news/2010/5/3/incredible-vintage-1979-alien-movie-theater-display.html (http://geektyrant.com/news/2010/5/3/incredible-vintage-1979-alien-movie-theater-display.html)
iMDB...ahhh...the fools. These certainly are from Prometheus.
Looking again at the original SJ....I can't help but believe that the chair and the jockey are both somewhat organic, as if, as Dallas put it 'grown out of the chair' of sorts. The entire design and execution of the creature seems like it comes from a culture that's completely organic which includes their technology.
Am I crazy?
Quote from: ThisBethesdaSea on Sep 30, 2011, 05:14:51 PM
Looking again at the original SJ....I can't help but believe that the chair and the jockey are both somewhat organic, as if, as Dallas put it 'grown out of the chair' of sorts. The entire design and execution of the creature seems like it comes from a culture that's completely organic which includes their technology.
Am I crazy?
That's the whole POINT of Giger's 'Biomechanic' pics...the fusing of the organic and inorganic to a point where you can't tell where one stops and the other starts.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUT0De4P_aU# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUT0De4P_aU#)
When I first heard about this story I mentally christened the guy "Space Jockey".
Quote from: BonesawT101 on Sep 30, 2011, 09:54:49 AM
over on imdb these pics have sparked a big debate with pretty much everyone coming to the conclusion that they are not from prometheus.
Are they idiots? What else is it from?