Ok so now after the "you had pre conceived notion about what the film was supposed to be so it was bound to happen that you did not like it" car we are now presented with the "you did not understand or payed enough attention" card.
Whatever floats your boat.
I was anal retentive when i watched the movie, as i am with all the movie i watch.
Its part of my job to see movie, how they are made, it serves what i do for a living.
So please don't you question my skills in that area.
If you don't agree ok i can dig it but please don't say i'm dense...
Thanks
Deuterium,
well i just loved the production design for exemple.
A bit too clean for my taste but seriously that is probably the best art direction in scifi movie i've seen in years.
The movie is just ok it can still be salvaged if there is actually an extended cut.
I think the most important improvement would be more character devellopement.
Stuff like Fifield and Millburn getting lost (seriously come on!!!) or the death of Janek, Ravel, Chance Vickers or Weyland are f**ked but maybe they can make them count if we get to know them better.
I remember that when we talked about the music, and who you guy were hoping was going to do the score you were let down by Ridley's choice, what i said is that Scott has been for a while on auto pilot, he works with the same guys, doing the same ok movies, well he did it again.
Whats is frustrating is that the potential is there...
