Text only | Text with Images

AvPGalaxy Forums

Films/TV => General Film/TV Discussion => Topic started by: War Wager on Mar 25, 2007, 10:10:16 PM

Title: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: War Wager on Mar 25, 2007, 10:10:16 PM
rawr
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: CELTICPRED on Mar 25, 2007, 11:18:12 PM
All I know that has been confirmed for this movie is that SAM NEILL will not be back.


I liked The Lost World, but you cannot beat the original, and well, Neill played a great Alan Grant even though in the book, he had a beard.


It all depends on what I hear and see from now on.  It's still in production hell though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Darkness on Mar 26, 2007, 07:41:18 PM
Obviously, a big dinosaur has to be the main one of the film. Yeah, I'd still say T-Rex. I was disappointed he was killed in JP3.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dekapitator on Mar 26, 2007, 08:52:38 PM
Quote from: >>Predalien Warrior<< on Mar 25, 2007, 10:10:16 PM
I'd like to see a big angry group of thoses spitters from the first movie (forgot their name) be the main meat-eaters in IV...

That dino's called Dilophosaurus. Dilophosaurs where around 20ft in lenght and weighed half a ton. (It's size was greatly reduced in the film.)
This time I'd like to see a full-sized one, some great raptor action (Raptors rule!), and the T-Rex as the "big boss".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: CELTICPRED on Mar 27, 2007, 04:43:13 AM
I'd like to see Goldblum back, he portrayed Malcolm almost perfectly from the book.



"There.....uh.......are supposed to be dinosaurs.......on this dinosaur tour.........right??  uhhh hello??"


"You will remember to wash your hands before you eat anything!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Mar 27, 2007, 01:44:46 PM
In IV, I'd like to see a fight between 2 T-rexes and the Spinosaurus (longer fight than JP3)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: fluxcap on Apr 01, 2007, 01:40:21 AM
I suppose more T-Rex action, but I can't see where they can go with a part 4. I've always thought a prequel would be decent, to see how InGen created the dino's in the lab. It could be more of a technological suspense movie that at the end has some fully grown dino's breaking loose from the labs and InGen would have to dispatch its hired guns to clean up the mess.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dachande on Apr 01, 2007, 04:15:10 AM
It depends on what timeline you go from, if you go from the movie timeline you've still essentially got the main cast from JP and Lex and Tim will be grown up, as well as possibly incorporating Dr. Wu into the storyline. If you go with the book storyline, you've still got a few people from the original JP, although TLW told us that Gennaro dies after surviving in the book, Muldoon could return, as he survived the book and i dont remember anything being said about him in TLW, although Hammond is dead and the the people from Biosyn as well, but they would probably just go with the movie continuity, which annoy me as i felt that if the book had been copied amost exactly it would of been even better than it was.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Predboy on Apr 23, 2007, 01:14:53 PM
I would like to see t.rex back in jurassic park 4. When I saw t.rex get killed so easy I got pissed.  >:( If that was real life the t.rex would've won hands down. How can this be you may ask, well lets start with when the t.rex got the first bite on the spino. We all know that t.rex had bonecrushing jaws so he would have just snapped spinos head right off because of the powerful jaws it has. Also I read somewhere that t.rex was more powerful than spino so that would have worked to its advantages. Also even though t.rex would most likely win if its was one on one, scientists are saying t.rex hunted in packs so yeah, one spino against 6 t.rexs, not a good sign for old spiny.

So its settled, T.rex rules, spino drules.  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dachande on Apr 23, 2007, 01:32:50 PM
Scientists also said that Dinosaurs were descendats of lizerds, they were wrong, your just going by theories.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Apr 24, 2007, 03:03:18 PM
There have even been rumours about a gigantic prehistoric crocodile being the main dinosaur. Which doesn't really make sense to me because it's not techncally a dinosaur...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: fluxcap on Apr 24, 2007, 06:25:31 PM
When part 4 doesn't meet expectations at the box office, I wouldn't be surprised if we see JP 5 get Universal's direct-to-dvd sequel treatment.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Ultimate Predator on Apr 25, 2007, 04:49:10 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dorlingkindersley-uk.co.uk%2Fstatic%2Fcs%2Fuk%2F11%2Fclipart%2Fexp_dinosaur%2Fimg%2Fimage_exp_dino021.jpg&hash=1d86fc59e37b5019c8202f061337e6edd0db916b)

Having a Kronosaurus as the main would be awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: CELTICPRED on Apr 26, 2007, 06:47:49 PM
How and why would they develop the whole movie to be surrounded around a submarine dino?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: fluxcap on Apr 26, 2007, 07:07:43 PM
Easy, someone finds out John Hammond's underwater laboratory for sea-dino's. They plan ANOTHER expedition, they convince Alan Grant AGAIN to come along. They arrive, the guy with the big gun dies first and then a bunch of underwater shenanigans ensue (similar to Deep Blue Sea) with an eventual confrontation with a Kronosaurus. Eventually Grant makes it to the surface to be saved by a helicopter and the film will fade out AGAIN with pterodactyls flying alongside the helicopter while the Jurassic Park theme plays in the background. And there we have Jurassic Park 4: The Lost Undersea World  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MrLee on May 04, 2007, 09:48:17 PM
what was that cheese i read where it was gonna be in the future with crime fighting dinosaurs lmao?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Master Chief on May 09, 2007, 08:48:59 PM
T-rex should definitely be brought back.  He should not have even been killed in JP 3.  The Spinosaurus was a thin fish eater.  His teeth were conical shaped to hold fish.  One bite from the Rex would have killed him.  I called BS when he died. Anyhow, T-Rex is the King.

I would like to see the T-rex go head to head with a Bull Triceratops.  That is a great old school battle!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Predboy on May 09, 2007, 09:08:50 PM
I would like t.rex to get its respect back by killing that pathetic excuse of a dino, spinosaurus.  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on May 09, 2007, 09:23:13 PM
Quote from: Master Chief on May 09, 2007, 08:48:59 PM
T-rex should definitely be brought back.  He should not have even been killed in JP 3.  The Spinosaurus was a thin fish eater.  His teeth were conical shaped to hold fish.  One bite from the Rex would have killed him.  I called BS when he died. Anyhow, T-Rex is the King.

I would like to see the T-rex go head to head with a Bull Triceratops.  That is a great old school battle!


The Spinosaurus was definitley not a fish eater. It ate just as much meat if not more so than anything else. Baryonyx ate fish. It had a crocodile-like snout too and looked kind of like the Spino but nowhere near a big.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Predboy on May 09, 2007, 10:01:03 PM
Quote from: Clone#8 on May 09, 2007, 09:23:13 PM
Quote from: Master Chief on May 09, 2007, 08:48:59 PM
T-rex should definitely be brought back.  He should not have even been killed in JP 3.  The Spinosaurus was a thin fish eater.  His teeth were conical shaped to hold fish.  One bite from the Rex would have killed him.  I called BS when he died. Anyhow, T-Rex is the King.

I would like to see the T-rex go head to head with a Bull Triceratops.  That is a great old school battle!


The Spinosaurus was definitley not a fish eater. It ate just as much meat if not more so than anything else. Baryonyx ate fish. It had a crocodile-like snout too and looked kind of like the Spino but nowhere near a big.

Uhhhhhh, hate to break it to you, but, yeah it was. Foosil records shown fish inside a spinosaurus's stomach so theres your proof. Its jaws were designed to eat fish. Spinosaurus did eat meat too, but im just saying since you said its definately not a fish eater.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Noir-Gojira on May 10, 2007, 05:18:07 AM
Quote from: Clone#8 on May 09, 2007, 09:23:13 PM
Baryonyx ate fish. It had a crocodile-like snout too and looked kind of like the Spino but nowhere near a big.

. . . meaning that the Spinosaurus eats really big fish XD.

T. Rex isn't my favorite dinosaur in the lot, but I have to admit, it didn't deserve such a crappy appearance in the latest trilogy and Spielberg owes it another shot (if you're going to kill it off, put the thing up against impossible odds while bringing everyone else down with it).  The raptors have lost their threatening edge after the first movie (obstacles in Lost World and nuisances in JP3) so I don't know if its worth giving them another shot.  DEFINITELY want to see the spitters back though.  The fact that they're genetically mutated freaks make it all the sweeter ^_^
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dekapitator on May 10, 2007, 12:57:34 PM
Raptors ARE worth giving another shot. It just needs to be done well. Besides, raptors rule.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on May 10, 2007, 01:29:14 PM
I've always wanted to see Raptors run full speed across a field. You see that in JP3, but only for a few seconds.  >:(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Predator Queen on May 11, 2007, 11:03:20 AM
Quote from: Clone#8 on May 10, 2007, 01:29:14 PM
I've always wanted to see Raptors run full speed across a field. You see that in JP3, but only for a few seconds.  >:(
i grew up on Jurassic Park, But anyways i think there should be another rapor and t rex when the t rex lost in the third movie it made me a bit angry
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ShadowPred on May 11, 2007, 08:01:58 PM
It pissed all the kids, from my generation. I eman no way a T-Rex, is going to lose to a crappy lokking spinosaurous. Or maybe that's just my inner child talking.


Oh, and about it being all in the future is pure bogus. Spielberg (i think said) that he was going to put a scene that didn't make it into Jurassic Park the lost world, which was the part where the raptors are chasing some people who are running away on a motorcycle.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Predboy on May 11, 2007, 08:17:41 PM
Quote from: ShadowPred on May 11, 2007, 08:01:58 PM
It pissed all the kids, from my generation. I eman no way a T-Rex, is going to lose to a crappy lokking spinosaurous. Or maybe that's just my inner child talking.


Oh, and about it being all in the future is pure bogus. Spielberg (i think said) that he was going to put a scene that didn't make it into Jurassic Park the lost world, which was the part where the raptors are chasing some people who are running away on a motorcycle.

I think thats going to be a seen in part 4. At least thats what I read.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Master Chief on May 16, 2007, 06:59:34 PM
Quote from: White Ookami on May 11, 2007, 11:03:20 AM
Quote from: Clone#8 on May 10, 2007, 01:29:14 PM
I've always wanted to see Raptors run full speed across a field. You see that in JP3, but only for a few seconds.  >:(
i grew up on Jurassic Park, But anyways i think there should be another rapor and t rex when the t rex lost in the third movie it made me a bit angry

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi33.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fd86%2Fgsx009%2FT-Rex.jpg&hash=454d10ed5a079902f35dca39efa4e9c97e5f3b15)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Predator Queen on May 16, 2007, 09:24:29 PM
Quote from: Master Chief on May 16, 2007, 06:59:34 PM
Quote from: White Ookami on May 11, 2007, 11:03:20 AM
Quote from: Clone#8 on May 10, 2007, 01:29:14 PM
I've always wanted to see Raptors run full speed across a field. You see that in JP3, but only for a few seconds.  >:(
i grew up on Jurassic Park, But anyways i think there should be another rapor and t rex when the t rex lost in the third movie it made me a bit angry

http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d86/gsx009/T-Rex.jpg
kawaii!!! (thats Japanese for "Cute" )
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: crypto84 on May 17, 2007, 07:52:37 PM
I think the T Rex should be the main huge dinosaur for JP4 cause the T. Rex is one of the most iconic dinosaurs on the movie screen. Even though spinosaurus is currently the biggest meat eating dinosaur that ever lived it's only a matter of time before an even bigger one will be dicovered since new species are discovered every year. By the way spinosaurus is only in JP3 because the dino expert (Jack Horner) they had for the film ahtes T Rex for some reason and he admitted it on a tv programme that aired in the uk a few years ago.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Predator Queen on May 17, 2007, 11:27:45 PM
Quote from: crypto84 on May 17, 2007, 07:52:37 PM
I think the T Rex should be the main huge dinosaur for JP4 cause the T. Rex is one of the most iconic dinosaurs on the movie screen. Even though spinosaurus is currently the biggest meat eating dinosaur that ever lived it's only a matter of time before an even bigger one will be dicovered since new species are discovered every year. By the way spinosaurus is only in JP3 because the dino expert (Jack Horner) they had for the film ahtes T Rex for some reason and he admitted it on a tv programme that aired in the uk a few years ago.
wow alot of people here are from the UK i dident even really think that it was possible
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Jun 11, 2007, 12:03:37 PM
Three words:

Raptor versus Spitter.


Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ElderPredator on Jun 12, 2007, 04:42:47 PM
Here's a poster(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi211.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fbb37%2Fhugol22%2Fjurassicpark4.jpg&hash=0d6f6d4b37237883ab95d719e33b08e1f1727039)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ShadowPred on Jun 12, 2007, 04:43:32 PM
The only fan-poster i have ever seen for JP4
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Jun 12, 2007, 04:49:32 PM
For a second there I thought that was an official poster!  :P It looks really good!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Ultimate Predator on Jun 12, 2007, 04:59:38 PM
Wow, awesome poster.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Jun 12, 2007, 05:28:13 PM
Yeah, seen that before. Real good, though not authentic by a long shot.

Do you think they should have the red Ceratosaurus from JP///'s dung pile scene involved in a bigger role? As a matter of fact, I'd love to see an Ankylosaurus/Euoplocephalus smash something up with it's tail. That, and a Raptor battling with a Dilophosaur.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Predator Queen on Jun 12, 2007, 06:41:11 PM
I hope its not the last movie
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ShadowPred on Jun 12, 2007, 06:44:05 PM
I remember reading a long time ago that there was a plan to do 6 movies in total
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Predator Queen on Jun 12, 2007, 06:54:31 PM
Quote from: ShadowPred on Jun 12, 2007, 06:44:05 PM
I remember reading a long time ago that there was a plan to do 6 movies in total
sweet i grew up with jurassic park i will die with it too lol!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ShadowPred on Jun 12, 2007, 07:06:36 PM
For all i know this is false, so who knows.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Jun 12, 2007, 07:30:19 PM
Quote from: White Ookami on Jun 12, 2007, 06:54:31 PM
Quote from: ShadowPred on Jun 12, 2007, 06:44:05 PM
I remember reading a long time ago that there was a plan to do 6 movies in total
sweet i grew up with jurassic park i will die with it too lol!
It's the very thing that sparked my interest for the career.

What would you personally want to see in the next film?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Predator Queen on Jun 12, 2007, 07:54:44 PM
Quote from: Nychus on Jun 12, 2007, 07:30:19 PM
Quote from: White Ookami on Jun 12, 2007, 06:54:31 PM
Quote from: ShadowPred on Jun 12, 2007, 06:44:05 PM
I remember reading a long time ago that there was a plan to do 6 movies in total
sweet i grew up with jurassic park i will die with it too lol!
It's the very thing that sparked my interest for the career.

What would you personally want to see in the next film?
I dont know mabey some of those dinos from walking with dinos on discovery channal
Title: What would you like to see in Jurassic Park IV?
Post by: War Wager on Jun 12, 2007, 11:10:49 PM
The JPIV thread seems to be quite popular, so what would you want to see if there was ever to be a forth movie?
Title: Re: What would you like to see in Jurassic Park IV?
Post by: CELTICPRED on Jun 13, 2007, 02:49:29 AM
Why make another thread.........for an already existing thread???
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: CELTICPRED on Jun 13, 2007, 02:51:03 AM
There is another poster, it's a foot print with 3 toes.


Looks like this:

\V

As in roman numeral 1 and 5.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Master Chief on Jun 14, 2007, 06:23:44 PM
A few have mentioned this before, but I would like to see the raptors actually running full speed after something.  Not just one either, I'm talking the whole pack.  Jumping over stuff and cuttin' through trees.  I just want an amazing visual of the raptors at full speed.

I would like the beginning of the movie to be like this. The spinosarus drinking water when he sees the water tremors. He looks up and nothing.  Goes back to take a drink and sees them again.  This time when it looks up a t-rex is staring at him.  He does his little roar and charges.  T-rex being the "king" rams him with his massive head knocking it to the ground.  Goes for the throat and ultimately ripping it apart.  Of course, he has to do his trademark roar and then the movie can begin.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Jun 14, 2007, 09:26:54 PM
I'd like the movie to open with the Pheradons attacking a busy town and Paul, Amanda and Eric from JP3 are killed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ShadowPred on Jun 14, 2007, 11:30:01 PM
Quote from: Master Chief on Jun 14, 2007, 06:23:44 PM
A few have mentioned this before, but I would like to see the raptors actually running full speed after something.  Not just one either, I'm talking the whole pack.  Jumping over stuff and cuttin' through trees.  I just want an amazing visual of the raptors at full speed.

I would like the beginning of the movie to be like this. The spinosarus drinking water when he sees the water tremors. He looks up and nothing.  Goes back to take a drink and sees them again.  This time when it looks up a t-rex is staring at him.  He does his little roar and charges.  T-rex being the "king" rams him with his massive head knocking it to the ground.  Goes for the throat and ultimately ripping it apart.  Of course, he has to do his trademark roar and then the movie can begin.



i agree with this 100% T-REX FTW!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Noir-Gojira on Jun 17, 2007, 04:47:34 AM
Quote from: Master Chief on Jun 14, 2007, 06:23:44 PM
A few have mentioned this before, but I would like to see the raptors actually running full speed after something.  Not just one either, I'm talking the whole pack.  Jumping over stuff and cuttin' through trees.  I just want an amazing visual of the raptors at full speed.

I would like the beginning of the movie to be like this. The spinosarus drinking water when he sees the water tremors. He looks up and nothing.  Goes back to take a drink and sees them again.  This time when it looks up a t-rex is staring at him.  He does his little roar and charges.  T-rex being the "king" rams him with his massive head knocking it to the ground.  Goes for the throat and ultimately ripping it apart.  Of course, he has to do his trademark roar and then the movie can begin.


Meh, lacks finess.  Better to have the revenge be indirect to up the body count, such as the Spinosaurus getting it's ass ripped open by some Giganotosaurs and then having the Gigas in turn being whooped by the Rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Jun 17, 2007, 10:14:42 AM
Or simply have the Spino killed by hundreds of Raptors as depicted in the original JPIII shooting script.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dekapitator on Jun 17, 2007, 11:09:48 AM
I'd like to see bigger raptors like Utahraptors.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Jun 17, 2007, 03:39:36 PM
The original Raptors are already ten feet tall(requested by Spielberg), so a bigger Raptor wouldn't be necessary.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dachande on Jun 17, 2007, 03:50:57 PM
Technically what we see in the movies as Velociraptors arent Velociraptors at all, real Velociraptors are the size of a turkey, which kinda ruined the movies for me when i realised that. But Deinonychus' make me scared because thats what JP Raptors were based on. Also i would love to see a proper sized Dilophosaurus (spitters), because the ones in the movie were much smaller than Dilos were. From what i've read, Dilos were around 10 feet tall
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Jun 17, 2007, 04:22:28 PM
Add to that the feathers that Raptors in JPIV will most definitely acquire and you have a serious contester for the "main badass" in the film. Just think about it, feathers versus frills, there's no contest. Atleast the Spitter(as they're called in the merchandise) is a lot more intimidating than what the Raptors have turned out to be. If you turn the main stars into fricking birds you've just put out your own thriller franchise.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dachande on Jun 17, 2007, 04:23:22 PM
Dilo's didnt have frills either
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dekapitator on Jun 17, 2007, 04:23:51 PM
Quote from: Nychus on Jun 17, 2007, 03:39:36 PM
The original Raptors are already ten feet tall(requested by Spielberg), so a bigger Raptor wouldn't be necessary.

More like around 7 feet.

Quote from: Dachande on Jun 17, 2007, 03:50:57 PM
Also i would love to see a proper sized Dilophosaurus (spitters), because the ones in the movie were much smaller than Dilos were. From what i've read, Dilos were around 10 feet tall

In the JP novel they where 10 feet tall, should have been like that in the movie aswell. The one in the movie was ridiculously small.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Noir-Gojira on Jun 17, 2007, 05:08:53 PM
It was a juvenile :p
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Predator Queen on Jun 17, 2007, 10:38:45 PM
There should be more human eating the the next movie!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Jun 18, 2007, 04:52:36 PM
Quote from: Dekapitator on Jun 17, 2007, 04:23:51 PM
More like around 7 feet.
According to most JP trivia, it's ten feet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dekapitator on Jun 18, 2007, 04:56:36 PM
10 feet=3 meters
They where about 2 meters tall.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Jun 18, 2007, 05:08:03 PM
About human hight, yes. The mentioned ten feet may have been said because of the first findings of Utahraptor that were made during the production of the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Predboy on Jun 18, 2007, 07:59:27 PM
Quote from: Master Chief on Jun 14, 2007, 06:23:44 PM
A few have mentioned this before, but I would like to see the raptors actually running full speed after something.  Not just one either, I'm talking the whole pack.  Jumping over stuff and cuttin' through trees.  I just want an amazing visual of the raptors at full speed.

I would like the beginning of the movie to be like this. The spinosarus drinking water when he sees the water tremors. He looks up and nothing.  Goes back to take a drink and sees them again.  This time when it looks up a t-rex is staring at him.  He does his little roar and charges.  T-rex being the "king" rams him with his massive head knocking it to the ground.  Goes for the throat and ultimately ripping it apart.  Of course, he has to do his trademark roar and then the movie can begin.

I would love to see this happen in the film. I got, sooooooooooo pissed when the spino killed rex. It was major bullshit if you know how strong t.rex really is. One thing I can tell you that if that fight actually happened, the t.rex would have won hands down. Why? Oh, I dont know, maybe the fact that t.rexs have the strongest jaws known to man. In the beggining of the fight, t.rex gets first dibs on spino's neck, so it would've been over there. It would have ripped the sucker's neck off. T.rex IS king of the dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Jun 19, 2007, 12:31:50 PM
I agree, scavenger or not, the T-Rex still owns the Spino in bite strenght, a formidable advantage even by it's own. The Spino only has the arms, really, as it's jaws just aren't built to the same capacity as the Rexe's. Thus, I think we all know the true reason for why the Spino beat the big T with physical impossibility.

*starts humming the Abba tune*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dachande on Jun 22, 2007, 12:13:57 AM
I'd say that a Megalodon, probably has a stronger bite strength than a T-Rex. About the whole, T-Rex vs Spino thing, this all depends on whoever gets the first good bite in, because then its pretty much over, for the record though, Spinosaurus was quite probably stronger than the T-Rex, considering it was much larger, and weight a few tonnes more.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ShadowPred on Jun 22, 2007, 12:15:43 AM
What about Gigantosaurous?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dachande on Jun 22, 2007, 12:20:08 AM
Im guessing you mean The carnivore Giganotosaurus, Gigantosaurus was a herbivore. Giganotosaurus, was longer than T-Rex, but smaller than Spino

But i am taking most of this from Wikipedia >__>
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: darkbladepred on Jun 22, 2007, 12:23:57 AM
Noooo! Giganotosaurus is the one in dino crisis 2 that kicks t-rex's ass. That is not a herbivore dude. It's bipedal, and has a huge mouth.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.hugi.is%2Fsaga%2F55104.jpg&hash=cbfa21c96877d6e3801bba5f26d55e0211f8be2b)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dinotopia.com%2FT.rex%2520vs.%2520Giganoto.jpg&hash=1b59ddb70327e4af5d005fd424cd24db60b22a34)

Giganotosaurus is the one on the right.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dachande on Jun 22, 2007, 12:27:23 AM
Gigantosaurus is a Herbivore.

GiganOtosaurus was the carnivore, and i said before that it was longer than T-rex
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Predboy on Jun 22, 2007, 12:34:33 AM
Quote from: Dachande on Jun 22, 2007, 12:13:57 AM
I'd say that a Megalodon, probably has a stronger bite strength than a T-Rex. About the whole, T-Rex vs Spino thing, this all depends on whoever gets the first good bite in, because then its pretty much over, for the record though, Spinosaurus was quite probably stronger than the T-Rex, considering it was much larger, and weight a few tonnes more.

Well I dont know the bite force of this big shark but I can say that a t.rex has the weight of a pick up truck behind each tooth. Thats roughly over 3000 pounds I think. You count the teeth, you do the math. I read this in a book so I cant give you a link. Sorry. And, we'll never really know how powerful a spino really is until we get a skeleton of one. The only one that was found was destroyed, and seeing as how people aren't having luck finding another one, we wont know for a while.

Quote from: darkbladepred on Jun 22, 2007, 12:23:57 AM
Noooo! Giganotosaurus is the one in dino crisis 2 that kicks t-rex's ass. That is not a herbivore dude. It's bipedal, and has a huge mouth.

He's talking about another dino with a similar name.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: darkbladepred on Jun 22, 2007, 12:46:29 AM
Discovery channel describes Gigantosaurus (not GiganOtosaurus) as:
"insanely vicious Gigantosaurus in front of you, drool dripping off its razor-sharp teeth...  that this largest flesh-eating dinosaur, somewhat resembling its northern cousin Tyrannosaurus rex but larger...:
Link to article: http://www.exn.ca/dinosaurs/story.asp?id=1998041653&name=archives (http://www.exn.ca/dinosaurs/story.asp?id=1998041653&name=archives)

I'm looking but I can't find the thing you described anywhere but wiki, You may be right, but it must be a VERY common misconception if so.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dachande on Jun 22, 2007, 12:52:50 AM
That article is dated from 1998, and its stated on the Gigantosaurus wiki page, that the names are often misspelled and confused between each other, which is evident, as its happening in this topic.

As for Dino Crisis:

The PlayStation game Dino Crisis 2 features a Giganotosaurus. However, the size of the Giganotosaurus in the game was exaggerated and is much larger than in real life. In the game it is portrayed as being over 20 meters long and over 7 meters tall, while in real life it was, at most, 14 meters long and 5.5 meters tall.

The longest spinos were measure to be around 18m, whereas Giganotosaurus is at most 14m.

Its also quite possible that the Gigantosaurus, has been rediscovered under a new name
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: darkbladepred on Jun 22, 2007, 01:04:09 AM
I'm not going to say that you are wrong, but I've seen the carnivore's name spelled with AND without the O. Can you plz give me an example besides Wiki? Wikipedia has info submitted by people, most of whom are not experts. If anyone can edit those pages then the dino there may not exhist. I really want to know for sure now If there are two seperate dinos.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dachande on Jun 22, 2007, 01:06:13 AM
Go to the Gigantosaurus wikipedia page, and theres 2 links at the bottom with the relevant information
    * http://www.dinoruss.com/de_4/5a8acf5.htm
    * http://www.users.qwest.net/~jstweet1/sauropoda.htm

Main thing here is that Gigantosaurus, isnt a well known dinosaur, so when people use the name they are thinkig of the Carnivor
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ShadowPred on Jun 22, 2007, 01:20:58 AM
NNOO!!!!!! it has been said that the Tyrannosaurous was a slow beast and wasw a vulture kind of dinosaur.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: darkbladepred on Jun 22, 2007, 01:22:38 AM
Quote from: ShadowPred on Jun 22, 2007, 01:20:58 AM
NNOO!!!!!! it has been said that the Tyrannosaurous was a slow beast and wasw a vulture kind of dinosaur.

theories, all theories! (at least that's what I tell myself to stay sane) Can they PROVE it? I hope not.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dachande on Jun 22, 2007, 01:23:19 AM
Thats old news.....if were perfectly honest, what exactly could a T-Rex accomplish with its Tiny arms, it could hardly grab the dinosaurs to keep them in place
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ShadowPred on Jun 22, 2007, 01:25:57 AM
And it is also the anestor of the POLLO!!!!!!


KLUK KLUK



NNNOOO!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dachande on Jun 22, 2007, 01:28:44 AM
If by pollo you are talking Italian, then yes the T-Rex did end up as a Chicken XD
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Predboy on Jun 22, 2007, 02:34:17 PM
Quote from: Dachande on Jun 22, 2007, 01:23:19 AM
Thats old news.....if were perfectly honest, what exactly could a T-Rex accomplish with its Tiny arms, it could hardly grab the dinosaurs to keep them in place

The old excuse that Im so familiar with. ;D I dont know how many times I've heard people say this. I'll use the fact everyone else uses to reply to this. Why do you think tyrannosaurus had such powerful jaws, obviously to help hold on to its prey when they're chowing down on them. Its jaws had special structures to absorb stress, which helped it hold on to a living animal. And shadowpred, t.rex may have been slow, but remember this, its prey was even slower so it doesn't prove the fact that it was a vulture like carnivore. I can only guess you heard this from a retarded paleontologist named Jack Horner say that.

This guy is always trying to make t.rex look like a dumb, scavenger, which is total bullshit, seeing as how there has been proof that a t.rex has hunted animals before or atleast attacked one. Fossil rcords show that a duckbilled dinosaur had healed bone on its back. It had teeth marks and seeing as how it was living during the time of the t.rex, they took a t.rex tooth and tryed to see if it matched the marks and it did. Prooves t.rex atleast atacked something that was alive.

Quote from: Dachande on Jun 22, 2007, 01:28:44 AM
If by pollo you are talking Italian, then yes the T-Rex did end up as a Chicken XD
Quote from: ShadowPred on Jun 22, 2007, 01:25:57 AM
And it is also the anestor of the POLLO!!!!!!


KLUK KLUK



NNNOOO!!!!!!!!

If your saying that t.rex is the direct ancestor of the chicken then I would have to disagree with you. T.rex was a revolutionary dead end. The chicken is only related to him.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Jun 22, 2007, 11:15:31 PM
When did this become a T.rex debate thread?

For pete's sake, everyone, who cares if it's the T.rex, Spino or another huge theropod, they're all the same, some just being a bit cooler than the others. It's so obvious that you can not remove the Tyrannosaurus from the public spotlight. Why? Because it's the perfect typical carnivore model. So, when you look at Giganotosaurus, Carcharodontosaurus or Allosaurus(etc) you see the same thing, T.rex. Heck, some brainless kids even mix the Spino with the Tyrannosaur, believe it or not. None of this "accuracy that will still keep changing during centuries" has any true meaning whatsoever. The T.rex stays. Period.

To get back to the Jurassic Park IV topic, I want my Raptor Versus Spitter fight, dammit! 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Darkoo on Aug 14, 2007, 12:57:59 PM
Quote
Bloody-Disgusting learned this weekend that Universal Pictures has officially begun casting for Jurassic Park IV, which will film in Kauai, Hawaii later this year! Laura Dern confirmed her return to the franchise as Dr. Ellie Sattler here as Sam Neill will NOT return. We're told that the film is about the government who has trained dinosaurs to carry weapons and use them for battle purposes. Based on the I can now safely declare that this franchise has entered 'ridiculous sequel mode'. Watch for more news soon.
http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/9638

In My Opinion: Terrible idea :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: War Wager on Aug 14, 2007, 01:05:11 PM
Wow that story sucks! I like it that Laura Dern will be back, each character from the original now has they're own movie. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: fluxcap on Aug 14, 2007, 02:59:41 PM
I read that plot scenario over a year ago and hoped it was just a lame internet rumor. Looks like I was wrong.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: CELTICPRED on Aug 14, 2007, 03:24:44 PM
That is f**king stupid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: Irukandji on Aug 14, 2007, 05:21:03 PM
That must be a joke. Like Aliens and Predators fighting inside a K-Mart.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Ultimate Predator on Aug 14, 2007, 05:30:16 PM
Quote from: Darkoo on Aug 14, 2007, 12:57:59 PM
Quote
Bloody-Disgusting learned this weekend that Universal Pictures has officially begun casting for Jurassic Park IV, which will film in Kauai, Hawaii later this year! Laura Dern confirmed her return to the franchise as Dr. Ellie Sattler here as Sam Neill will NOT return. We're told that the film is about the government who has trained dinosaurs to carry weapons and use them for battle purposes. Based on the I can now safely declare that this franchise has entered 'ridiculous sequel mode'. Watch for more news soon.
http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/9638

In My Opinion: Terrible idea :'(

I reckon thats false.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: Nychus on Aug 14, 2007, 06:37:52 PM
I wouldn't buy it if I were you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Huol on Aug 15, 2007, 10:13:56 AM
Quote from: CELTICPRED on Mar 27, 2007, 04:43:13 AM
I'd like to see Goldblum back, he portrayed Malcolm almost perfectly from the book.



"There.....uh.......are supposed to be dinosaurs.......on this dinosaur tour.........right??  uhhh hello??"


"You will remember to wash your hands before you eat anything!"

"that's one big pile of shit."


I'd love Ian to come back, but what i'd really love is for Jeff Goldblum, Sam Neil and whoever it was who played Ellie  :D to come back.
And for it to be set on Isla Nublar, the original island, yes it was nuked in the book, but not in the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: War Wager on Aug 15, 2007, 10:25:25 AM
"when The Pirate's of the Carribean breaks down, the pirates don't eat the tourists"

Yeah Golblum was great in the first and second.

Thats the story I think the should have used in fourth movie, with the Island being nuked. They should set the fourth back on the first island, Isla Nublar. The dinosaurs would have evolved a great deal on that island...  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: Nychus on Aug 15, 2007, 10:33:11 AM
The original dinosaurs did infact die from the lycine deficiency stated by Samuel L. Jackson in the film as the island didn't offer proper plants for the herbivores like in Sorna. That still doesn't prevent people from bringing new dinos there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: Haloxpok3mon on Aug 15, 2007, 02:44:39 PM
Alien Queen Vs. T-Rex:
Battle of the tiny hands
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: Master Chief on Aug 15, 2007, 02:51:20 PM
Quote from: Nychus on Aug 15, 2007, 10:33:11 AM
The original dinosaurs did infact die from the lycine deficiency stated by Samuel L. Jackson in the film as the island didn't offer proper plants for the herbivores like in Sorna. That still doesn't prevent people from bringing new dinos there.

Dr. Malcolm has that conversation with John Hammond in JP2.  I remember Dr. Hammond saying something about them flourishing with out treatment...isn't that why they went to the Island?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: Nychus on Aug 15, 2007, 03:29:45 PM
Yes, InGen knew that there still were live dinosaurs at Site B, which is why TLW took place there. As for Nublar, that ones about the only "fresh" plotline still left in this franchise. What has the island turned to, is there still anything in there, did InGen sell it to someone else, someone who has more plans for it? There's you premise.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: Dachande on Aug 15, 2007, 03:33:22 PM
It all depends on what continuity we go by, the movies continuity, would have the Pterasaurs (IIRC) escaping the aviary, and all the animals on Nublar, would still be there, unless DX has kicked in. Book continuity, and you have animals on the costa rican mainland, Sorna is still populated by animals, and Nublar got nuked to hell, not to mention some people that died are still alive, i cant remember if TLW States that Muldoon died
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: fluxcap on Aug 15, 2007, 03:38:33 PM
Muldoon survived in the first book. Malcom did die in the first book, but he "survived" his injuries and came back in the 2nd book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: Dachande on Aug 15, 2007, 03:49:12 PM
I know muldoon survived the first book, but i remember a bit in TLW, where i think its Dodgson, or someone discussing the people that died, such as Gennaro who died of Dysentry? I cant remember if muldoon was listed.

BTW Drunk Book Muldoon >>>>>>>> Movie Muldoon
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: fluxcap on Aug 15, 2007, 04:04:40 PM
Quote from: Dachande on Aug 15, 2007, 03:49:12 PM
I know muldoon survived the first book, but i remember a bit in TLW, where i think its Dodgson, or someone discussing the people that died, such as Gennaro who died of Dysentry? I cant remember if muldoon was listed.

BTW Drunk Book Muldoon >>>>>>>> Movie Muldoon
Nah, Muldoon isn't even mentioned in the 2nd book. Drunken Muldoon would have been interesting, at least he had a massive stockpile of weapons...and booze.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Predboy on Aug 15, 2007, 04:05:51 PM
Quote from: Darkoo on Aug 14, 2007, 12:57:59 PM
Quote
Bloody-Disgusting learned this weekend that Universal Pictures has officially begun casting for Jurassic Park IV, which will film in Kauai, Hawaii later this year! Laura Dern confirmed her return to the franchise as Dr. Ellie Sattler here as Sam Neill will NOT return. We're told that the film is about the government who has trained dinosaurs to carry weapons and use them for battle purposes. Based on the I can now safely declare that this franchise has entered 'ridiculous sequel mode'. Watch for more news soon.
http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/9638

In My Opinion: Terrible idea :'(

I always thought that was some horrible rumor. God I hope its not true. :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: WisePredator on Aug 15, 2007, 04:25:47 PM
A prediction of this movie is that it is going to suck more than JP///
BTW the writer of JPIV is also the writer of Kingdom of Heaven and The Departed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: War Wager on Aug 15, 2007, 04:45:10 PM
You're kidding! Those movies have great stories!  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: WisePredator on Aug 15, 2007, 04:48:00 PM
I know, Departed was a great film, but I think Monohan has been smoking something :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: The Ultimate Predator on Aug 15, 2007, 05:12:55 PM
Quote from: WisePredator on Aug 15, 2007, 04:48:00 PM
I know, Departed was a great film, but I think Monohan has been smoking something :P

If its true, which I doubt.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: War Wager on Aug 15, 2007, 07:56:11 PM
I sure hope it's not true. That idea is just way too cheesey...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: SM on Aug 16, 2007, 02:40:51 AM
Clicky (http://www.geocities.com/mangocat.geo/JP_3rd.doc)

This is a JP fan script I wrote 6 years ago.  I revised it a couple of times before the guy who asked me to write it piked out of the project.

Reading again for the first time since I wrote it, some of it still works and some of it is fairly embarrassing.  It wears it's references squarely on it's sleeve.

Note that this was written long before I saw the third film, so the couple of gags that seem lifted straight from JP3, are just coincidence.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Aug 16, 2007, 11:50:34 AM
Quote from: Predboy on Aug 15, 2007, 04:05:51 PM
Quote from: Darkoo on Aug 14, 2007, 12:57:59 PM
Quote
Bloody-Disgusting learned this weekend that Universal Pictures has officially begun casting for Jurassic Park IV, which will film in Kauai, Hawaii later this year! Laura Dern confirmed her return to the franchise as Dr. Ellie Sattler here as Sam Neill will NOT return. We're told that the film is about the government who has trained dinosaurs to carry weapons and use them for battle purposes. Based on the I can now safely declare that this franchise has entered 'ridiculous sequel mode'. Watch for more news soon.
http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/9638

In My Opinion: Terrible idea :'(

I always thought that was some horrible rumor. God I hope its not true. :(
If it is, they may just as well make it a g*dd@mn porn film. >:(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Aug 16, 2007, 02:11:38 PM
Quote from: The Ultimate Predator on Apr 25, 2007, 04:49:10 PM
http://www.dorlingkindersley-uk.co.uk/static/cs/uk/11/clipart/exp_dinosaur/img/image_exp_dino021.jpg

Having a Kronosaurus as the main would be awesome.

I agree, that would be cool to see.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: Master Chief on Aug 16, 2007, 04:49:43 PM
Quote from: SM on Aug 16, 2007, 02:40:51 AM
Clicky (http://www.geocities.com/mangocat.geo/JP_3rd.doc)

This is a JP fan script I wrote 6 years ago.  I revised it a couple of times before the guy who asked me to write it piked out of the project.

Reading again for the first time since I wrote it, some of it still works and some of it is fairly embarrassing.  It wears it's references squarely on it's sleeve.

Note that this was written long before I saw the third film, so the couple of gags that seem lifted straight from JP3, are just coincidence.

That was an action packed script.  One turn after another, soldiers were being killed.  I really liked the T-rex battle.  How the Liopleurodon snatched the soldier up and pissing the T-rex off, good stuff.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: SM on Aug 17, 2007, 01:12:51 AM
Thanks.

I nicked that Liopleurodon bit from an episode of Walking With Dinosaurs.  This small two legged dinosaur is foraging for shellfish in some rocks when the big bugger appears out of the water from nowhere and eats him.  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SPEC. AGENT KEYES on Aug 17, 2007, 01:38:33 AM
Quote from: The Ultimate Predator on Apr 25, 2007, 04:49:10 PM
http://www.dorlingkindersley-uk.co.uk/static/cs/uk/11/clipart/exp_dinosaur/img/image_exp_dino021.jpg

Having a Kronosaurus as the main would be awesome.
they had a plan for this dino i the 4th. jumps outta water and rips a airplane's wing off when the plane is low. Speilbergo said this story shoulda been the one for JP3.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: War Wager on Aug 17, 2007, 12:10:56 PM
After doing JP1, Joe Johnston came to Speilberg and asked to do a second movie. Speilberg said that if a third was ever considered, he'd be the first choice. JP3 isn't a bad movie, the most exiting of the lot, but I still think that this is Speilbergs franchise. 

You should check out JoBlo.com. According to that " a soldier of fortune finds himself in a Medieval castle where a nefarious cooperation has been breeding dinosaurs to be military weapons. They are super-smart they have dog and human DNA encoded into them (to make them obiediant and problem solving) and they also have enchanced legs and forearms. Oh and they'd be wearing body armour  and mabye shooting people too."

WHAT HAS THIS FRANCHISE BECOME!!  :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: SPEC. AGENT KEYES on Aug 17, 2007, 04:50:10 PM
Quote from: War Wager on Aug 17, 2007, 12:10:56 PM
After doing JP1, Joe Johnston came to Speilberg and asked to do a second movie. Speilberg said that if a third was ever considered, he'd be the first choice. JP3 isn't a bad movie, the most exiting of the lot, but I still think that this is Speilbergs franchise. 

You should check out JoBlo.com. According to that " a soldier of fortune finds himself in a Medieval castle where a nefarious cooperation has been breeding dinosaurs to be military weapons. They are super-smart they have dog and human DNA encoded into them (to make them obiediant and problem solving) and they also have enchanced legs and forearms. Oh and they'd be wearing body armour  and mabye shooting people too."

WHAT HAS THIS FRANCHISE BECOME!!  :o
So maybe will see huge carnivores with huge lasers and rocket launchers attached to their heads. I would actually like to see that water dinosaur. Somewhere on the internet said this, i do not know where but, the water dinosaur was the one that took the boat out full of jackass' in the begin of JP3
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: War Wager on Aug 17, 2007, 04:59:25 PM
Thats because I think a fourth movie was planned all along. You'd think it'd probably be the Spino that destroys the boat, but it could easily be the Krono...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: SPEC. AGENT KEYES on Aug 17, 2007, 08:16:48 PM
Quote from: War Wager on Aug 17, 2007, 04:59:25 PM
Thats because I think a fourth movie was planned all along. You'd think it'd probably be the Spino that destroys the boat, but it could easily be the Krono...
it was the one who took the boat full of assholes. krono is a good idea because stan winston would maje it and u do not know what it would act like, but it will be badass that's for sure.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: Dane on Aug 17, 2007, 08:54:46 PM
The Tyrannosaurus Rex could not have been beaten by Spinosaurus because Spinosaurus didn't have the teeth for fighting. It is a fish eater, no more, no less. Also Spinosaurus doesnt have very strong bones. When the T-rex bit Spino's neck it would have broken Spino's neck.  Its arms were more under the body for catching fish as well, so it wouldn't be able to    break T-Rex's  neck. T-Rex by far is stronger than all the carnivores. Gigantosaurus and Carcardontosaurus cant beat T-Rex because they have teeth for stabbing and slicing but no force behind it. T-Rex had the teeth to crush anything so it is proven that the Tyrannosaurus Rex was the top carnivore. So he should be the main Dinosaur and victor of all the fights he gets into.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: SPEC. AGENT KEYES on Aug 17, 2007, 10:54:33 PM
Quote from: Dane on Aug 17, 2007, 08:54:46 PM
The Tyrannosaurus Rex could not have been beaten by Spinosaurus because Spinosaurus didn't have the teeth for fighting. It is a fish eater, no more, no less. Also Spinosaurus doesnt have very strong bones. When the T-rex bit Spino's neck it would have broken Spino's neck.  Its arms were more under the body for catching fish as well, so it wouldn't be able to    break T-Rex's  neck. T-Rex by far is stronger than all the carnivores. Gigantosaurus and Carcardontosaurus cant beat T-Rex because they have teeth for stabbing and slicing but no force behind it. T-Rex had the teeth to crush anything so it is proven that the Tyrannosaurus Rex was the top carnivore. So he should be the main Dinosaur and victor of all the fights he gets into.
what thew hell was their problem with spino killing trex? trex should of just ripped the spino's neck right there. spino is just another one of universal's great idea's.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: Nychus on Aug 18, 2007, 09:04:30 AM
That discussion has been gone through hundreds of times in the past, so, please, don't repeat it.

It would be near impossible to clone a marine reptile, by the way. What I'd rather see is the return of everyone's favorite spitting menace, Dilophosaurus. Perhaps also a Carnotaurus as seen in Crichton's book of The Lost World.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: azerty on Aug 18, 2007, 10:24:17 PM
I'd like more dino battles. More involvement of the stegosaurus and triceratops. An Apatosaurus (brontosaurus) vs a T rex. Basically a lot of dinos that didn't have much screentime in the other 3 movies.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: x-M-x on Aug 18, 2007, 10:48:28 PM
OMG!!!


Teaser


(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fv470%2Ftokyo_racer%2Fjurassic-park-4.gif&hash=42ba7bf614c24ed9bf6ac1e6d326c18c5d419c91)



LoL that still cracks me up!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: Mike’s Monsters on Aug 18, 2007, 10:59:36 PM
Quote from: x-Mandalore-x on Aug 18, 2007, 10:48:28 PM
OMG!!!


Teaser


http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v470/tokyo_racer/jurassic-park-4.gif



LoL that still cracks me up!

OH SHOOT! THAT LOOKS EPIC!!!

That was great! It was a good laugh, thanks!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: SPEC. AGENT KEYES on Aug 18, 2007, 11:15:51 PM
Quote from: Nychus on Aug 18, 2007, 09:04:30 AM
That discussion has been gone through hundreds of times in the past, so, please, don't repeat it.

It would be near impossible to clone a marine reptile, by the way. What I'd rather see is the return of everyone's favorite spitting menace, Dilophosaurus. Perhaps also a Carnotaurus as seen in Crichton's book of The Lost World.
I think the dilopho's will return. they should have it be animatronic just like in the first one. Did anyone get scared shitless, the first time u saw JP?(meaning the theatre release or DVD.)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: Aeus on Aug 19, 2007, 12:35:44 AM
A Gigantasaurus would be cool.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: Nychus on Aug 19, 2007, 09:07:46 AM
The first one was a treat back at the 90's, but nowadays it's badly weighed down by the sequels and it's fairly thin human characters. Then again, the very selling point of this trilogy are the dinosaurs. When they make the next film I seriously wish that they cut down on dialogue and show us more of the dinosaurs. I'm sick and tired of caricatures like the Kirbies in JP/// and Sarah Harding in TLW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: darkbladepred on Aug 20, 2007, 11:15:26 AM
^ But how about characters like Malcolm huh?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: The Facehugger's facehugger on Aug 20, 2007, 12:02:39 PM
I'm just saying this but I found out on a website that this might not be true but it said that there was a plot that dinos would be armed with guns.I forgot what the site was but I'll find it out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: darkbladepred on Aug 20, 2007, 12:23:25 PM
^ That's already been posted in this thread before I think...

Anyway, it better not happen. I swear I'll not go see the movie if that happens. I'll pretend there is no JP4.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: Nychus on Aug 21, 2007, 12:02:18 PM
Quote from: darkbladepred on Aug 20, 2007, 11:15:26 AM
^ But how about characters like Malcolm huh?
Malcolm wasn't a caricature(my favorite from all films). His relatives, on the other hand, I'd had gladly watched to get eaten. I also believe Roland Tembo, played by Peter Postelthwaite, was one of the very few strongly foundated characters along Malcolm. The problem, still, is that there's much more obscure people no one watching an action film gives a damn about, especially since they're so cheesy.

And I concur, the gun-carrying-dinos stunk to high heaven. It was NOT true. And that's because Spielberg, being a competent film-maker, would have never allowed such a sh*tfest off the ground.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: SM on Aug 21, 2007, 09:38:46 PM
I remember Peter Jackson did a pisstake announcement of two King Kong sequels where Driscoll, Anne and Denham would team up with the Son of Kong - mounted with machine guns - to take on the Nazis.  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: War Wager on Aug 22, 2007, 07:24:37 AM
Why'd he do that? I actually thought they were going ahead with that!  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: SM on Aug 22, 2007, 07:59:16 AM
In a production diary date April 1?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: Nychus on Aug 22, 2007, 10:42:16 AM
That was, luckily, an April Fools joke. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV: Fights, Cast and Story Ideas
Post by: War Wager on Aug 22, 2007, 12:43:16 PM
I guess it was an April fools joke, 'cos it sure got me!  :P

Anyway I'm happy with Laura Dern coming back for IV, but I sure hope that shitty story isn't the one with the green light...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SPEC. AGENT KEYES on Aug 22, 2007, 06:09:06 PM
Quote from: fluxcap on Apr 26, 2007, 07:07:43 PM
Easy, someone finds out John Hammond's underwater laboratory for sea-dino's. They plan ANOTHER expedition, they convince Alan Grant AGAIN to come along. They arrive, the guy with the big gun dies first and then a bunch of underwater shenanigans ensue (similar to Deep Blue Sea) with an eventual confrontation with a Kronosaurus. Eventually Grant makes it to the surface to be saved by a helicopter and the film will fade out AGAIN with pterodactyls flying alongside the helicopter while the Jurassic Park theme plays in the background. And there we have Jurassic Park 4: The Lost Undersea World  ;)
they could have the Krono also have a couple of scenes to be in. maybe one scene u have some characters trapped in the water and it comes up and starts chucking people everywhere. T-Rex can still be the main dino though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Munkeywrench on Aug 22, 2007, 08:53:03 PM
Quote from: Predboy on Apr 23, 2007, 01:14:53 PM
I would like to see t.rex back in jurassic park 4. When I saw t.rex get killed so easy I got pissed.  >:( If that was real life the t.rex would've won hands down. How can this be you may ask, well lets start with when the t.rex got the first bite on the spino. We all know that t.rex had bonecrushing jaws so he would have just snapped spinos head right off because of the powerful jaws it has. Also I read somewhere that t.rex was more powerful than spino so that would have worked to its advantages. Also even though t.rex would most likely win if its was one on one, scientists are saying t.rex hunted in packs so yeah, one spino against 6 t.rexs, not a good sign for old spiny.

So its settled, T.rex rules, spino drules.  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D

Well in real life such a fight wouldnt be possible considering both dinos lived thousands of miles and at least a few million years apart from one another
Title: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Naissus on Oct 18, 2007, 04:07:09 PM
There hasn't been any new news on the movie, but I guess they are still going to go through with it.  I personally hope they turn the next movie into a horror like movie.  They could take some of the ideas from the Jurassic Park novel about the dinos escaping and being in Costa Rica and build from there.  They could even start the movie with the first chapter and it be a construction worker from a Costa Rican town.  I would love to see velociraptors terrorize a small isolated Costa Rican town. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Oct 18, 2007, 04:15:21 PM
I guess thats one of the fun things about JP, you can take any dinosaurs from any era and pit them against each other! They're probably going to put in more dino fights in this one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: aliendude on Oct 18, 2007, 06:16:06 PM
it's really funny that they put spinosaurus as the main dino.Considering that he was mostly a fish eater.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chrisr232007 on Oct 18, 2007, 06:46:37 PM
What is a krono?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Master Chief on Oct 18, 2007, 07:07:26 PM
This is a Krono
Quote from: The Ultimate Predator on Apr 25, 2007, 04:49:10 PM
http://www.dorlingkindersley-uk.co.uk/static/cs/uk/11/clipart/exp_dinosaur/img/image_exp_dino021.jpg

Having a Kronosaurus as the main would be awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Noir-Gojira on Oct 19, 2007, 08:19:10 PM
Pulling away from the "Oh!  I want to see this dinosaur!" subject, I think having Roland Tembo and Nick Van Owen in the next film would be ideal for a number of reasons.

Their presence in the film would satisfy the 'returning character' element of bringing a past survivor back into the mix while at the same time, providing ripe opportunities for character development.  In retrospect, it was Roland and Nick's conflicting philosophies and semi-rivalry with one another in The Lost World that ultimately lead to Jurassic Park being revealed to the public in the first place.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: WisePredator on Oct 19, 2007, 08:30:13 PM
Quote from: Noir-Gojira on Oct 19, 2007, 08:19:10 PM
Pulling away from the "Oh!  I want to see this dinosaur!" subject, I think having Roland Tembo and Nick Van Owen in the next film would be ideal for a number of reasons.

Their presence in the film would satisfy the 'returning character' element of bringing a past survivor back into the mix while at the same time, providing ripe opportunities for character development.  In retrospect, it was Roland and Nick's conflicting philosophies and semi-rivalry with one another in The Lost World that ultimately lead to Jurassic Park being revealed to the public in the first place.
I always liked Nick and Roland. It's a shame none of them were in part 3.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Noir-Gojira on Oct 19, 2007, 08:35:56 PM
Glad they weren't.  Would have ruined their characters like it did to poor Grant.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: WisePredator on Oct 19, 2007, 08:38:09 PM
Quote from: Noir-Gojira on Oct 19, 2007, 08:35:56 PM
Glad they weren't.  Would have ruined their characters like it did to poor Grant.
If part 3 had a better script writer and director then Grant wouldn't have been ruined.
But sadly, Universal just got too greedy :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Naissus on Oct 20, 2007, 01:33:39 AM
I would like to see a fight between the JP3 raptors and the JP1 raptors.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SuperMassive on Oct 20, 2007, 02:20:55 AM
JP3 raptors were all males except one and JP1 raptors were all females right?

correct me if im wrong, thx

Btw, i'd like to see water dinosaur like plesiosaurus  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Noir-Gojira on Oct 20, 2007, 05:19:52 AM
Technically, most ocean-going reptiles of the mesozoic are only 'honorary dinosaurs', but I digress.  The fact that Grant came across raptor eggs and baby raptor tracks in the first  movie would indicate that either one of the three raptors are male ('The Big One'?), or one of the ones killed prior to the film were.
Title: Jurassic Park IV...
Post by: Robotpo on Nov 10, 2007, 03:00:30 AM
In case you can't tell, I'm a huge "Jurassic Park," fan  ;)...(except for the third one), and it seems that given the proper writer, there's still a hell of a lot to explore with this series, (stuff culled from unused portions of Michael Crichton's novels, tales about the building of the Park/Site B, political stories about how other factions would use the cloning technology, tales of new breeds of dinosaurs being created for nefarious purposes, prehistoric animals wreaking havoc on the mainland, ETC). I've been waiting for JP4 for years, and no luck so far, but hey, I can dream can't I.  :D Sooo...anyone else want a JP4, or should I just go back to JP Legacy... ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV...
Post by: MudButt on Nov 10, 2007, 03:02:35 AM
They're making a JP4, it's in development stages at the moment.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV...
Post by: Robotpo on Nov 10, 2007, 03:04:48 AM
I wish...but it looks like it's dead...there's still no script, and now the Writer's Strike is happening...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV...
Post by: MudButt on Nov 10, 2007, 03:07:55 AM
Well, films take time. The writer's strike is a problem though, the movie should come out by 2009 though, unless the Writer's decide to cry more.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV...
Post by: fraudinthe80s on Nov 10, 2007, 03:11:44 AM
Supposedly spilberg was going to start working on it after he finished with indiana jones.
Its what i heard anyway...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Nov 10, 2007, 03:53:52 AM
That great because he didn't made the 3rd movie because he was working on Artificial Intelligence: A.I.. I love the first 2 movies, i hope they have it in the city again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Noir-Gojira on Nov 10, 2007, 07:33:33 AM
I don't.  I want a bunch of people, trapped in the jungle without contact to the outside world, and ruthlessly hunted by everything that breathes. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Russian_Predator on Nov 10, 2007, 07:43:09 AM
The first film is better than the second, the second is better than the third, the fourth will be worse than the third. It seems to me so. ^^

P.S. Spino or T-Rex? ??? Both of them are worse... ^^
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Nov 10, 2007, 02:35:24 PM
I hope Jurassic Park dons't become just like Jaws series.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Huol on Nov 10, 2007, 02:56:51 PM
It'd be nice if Alan and Malcom came back...
Only this time with a good script.


I want it set on the first island, sure in the books it was nuked, but not in the movies.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Robotpo on Nov 10, 2007, 10:11:08 PM
I'd like to see Nublar again, but not for the whole movie. Personally, I'd really like to see a new breed of BioSyn dinosaurs running amok in the Costa Rican jungles.  :D Now that'd be awesome...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Noir-Gojira on Nov 10, 2007, 10:51:25 PM
QuoteI want it set on the first island, sure in the books it was nuked, but not in the movies.

Not nuked, just napalmed back to the Pre-Cambrian.  Though actually, they made a veiled mention of that in The Lost World.  Not that something still couldn't survive anyway, lol.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Nov 12, 2007, 12:55:09 AM
I hope we see a Deinosuchus in JP4.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Robotpo on Nov 12, 2007, 01:17:48 AM
If anyone's interested, this is a pretty good JP community:

http://www.jplegacy.org/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predatorfan101 on Nov 13, 2007, 11:23:31 PM
T-REX it never gets old! ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Simbobs12345 on Nov 13, 2007, 11:59:41 PM
T-rex should come back he would own alll! as he di in JP1, bringing Spinosauraus in as the main dino in JP 3 was bad, especially killing off the trex, the fight wasnt even thaT LONG.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Deadly Lotus on Nov 30, 2007, 01:14:31 PM
Is there going to be a Jurrasic Park IV?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: CanadianHero67 on Nov 30, 2007, 02:20:18 PM
Quote from: Predator_fan on Nov 30, 2007, 01:14:31 PM
Is there going to be a Jurrasic Park IV?

I hear there is going to be one. T-rex should be the main dino.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hudson on Nov 30, 2007, 06:39:48 PM
I wasn't impressed with the look of the Spinosauras in III.  It just wasn't as cool as the T-Rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Nov 30, 2007, 06:41:33 PM
The Spino actually seemed more fake than anything in the older films. T-rex will always be the king. I loved that dinosaur when I was a kid. When I saw the Spino snap his neck, I was pissed as hell.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Nov 30, 2007, 06:49:57 PM
I hope the T-rex has a biger role in movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: deoxysdef on Nov 30, 2007, 07:47:26 PM
Quote from: fluxcap on Apr 01, 2007, 01:40:21 AM
I suppose more T-Rex action, but I can't see where they can go with a part 4. I've always thought a prequel would be decent, to see how InGen created the dino's in the lab. It could be more of a technological suspense movie that at the end has some fully grown dino's breaking loose from the labs and InGen would have to dispatch its hired guns to clean up the mess.

Sounds like AVP-R..
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dark Passenger on Dec 01, 2007, 02:11:52 PM
Quote from: deoxysdef on Nov 30, 2007, 07:47:26 PM
Quote from: fluxcap on Apr 01, 2007, 01:40:21 AM
I suppose more T-Rex action, but I can't see where they can go with a part 4. I've always thought a prequel would be decent, to see how InGen created the dino's in the lab. It could be more of a technological suspense movie that at the end has some fully grown dino's breaking loose from the labs and InGen would have to dispatch its hired guns to clean up the mess.

Sounds like AVP-R..

Not really..... ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Dec 06, 2007, 11:49:14 PM
http://www.moviehole.net/news/20071206_jurassic_park_will_still_reope.html
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: CanadianHero67 on Dec 06, 2007, 11:59:09 PM
Quote from: Ratchetcomand on Dec 06, 2007, 11:49:14 PM
http://www.moviehole.net/news/20071206_jurassic_park_will_still_reope.html
Dinos with guns... LAIME!!!!!! Thats a terrible idea. That would totally leap away from what Jurrassic Park really is.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Dec 07, 2007, 12:03:55 AM
I think the idea has been drop out. That is the worst idea since the new born. It looks the movie is comeing out in 2009 now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dark Passenger on Dec 07, 2007, 12:11:04 AM
Quote from: CloakedKiller on Dec 06, 2007, 11:59:09 PM
Quote from: Ratchetcomand on Dec 06, 2007, 11:49:14 PM
http://www.moviehole.net/news/20071206_jurassic_park_will_still_reope.html
Dinos with guns... LAIME!!!!!! Thats a terrible idea. That would totally leap away from what Jurrassic Park really is.

yeah i agree, i dont want jurrasic park turnin into dinowars or somefin, i cant memba the show but its an old cartoon were good guys vs bad guys and they each control dino's with guns, sure it was good there but to turn jurrasic park into that its just makin it to different from the original
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Disc Jockey on Dec 07, 2007, 04:17:22 AM
Unless the story/script is totally original and brilliant...I don't think another Jurassic Park should be made. Enough is enough. They were STILL writing the script, while filming Jurassic Park 3!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jan 05, 2008, 06:51:38 PM
I want to see a Dimetrodon in JP4.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: WisePredator on Jan 05, 2008, 08:16:58 PM
I want to see all the dinosaurs that were left out of the book in JP4. Even that huge dragonfly, Meganeura, which was also in the book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: NikTh on Jan 05, 2008, 08:23:25 PM
Quote from: the Joker on Dec 07, 2007, 12:11:04 AM
Quote from: CloakedKiller on Dec 06, 2007, 11:59:09 PM
Quote from: Ratchetcomand on Dec 06, 2007, 11:49:14 PM
http://www.moviehole.net/news/20071206_jurassic_park_will_still_reope.html
Dinos with guns... LAIME!!!!!! Thats a terrible idea. That would totally leap away from what Jurrassic Park really is.

yeah i agree, i dont want jurrasic park turnin into dinowars or somefin, i cant memba the show but its an old cartoon were good guys vs bad guys and they each control dino's with guns, sure it was good there but to turn jurrasic park into that its just makin it to different from the original

You mean Dinoriders?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jan 05, 2008, 08:39:44 PM
Dinos i want to see in Jurassic Park 4

Tyrannosaurus
Velociraptor
Triceratops
Pteranodon
Brachiosaurus
Dilophosaurus
Stegosaurus
Allosaurus
Parasaurolophus
Dimetrodon (Not really a dinosaur but it would be cool to see)
Compsognathus
Pachycephalosaurus
Ankylosaurus
Camptosaurus
Deinonychus
Baryonyx
Deinosuchus
Hadrosaurus
Plesiosaur (Same with Dimetrodon)
Iguanodon
Muttaburrasaurus
Protoceratops
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: severen76 on Jan 05, 2008, 08:41:17 PM
Quote from: Ratchetcomand on Jan 05, 2008, 08:39:44 PM
Dinos i want to see in Jurassic Park 4

Tyrannosaurus
Velociraptor
Triceratops
Pteranodon
Brachiosaurus
Dilophosaurus
Stegosaurus
Allosaurus
Parasaurolophus
Dimetrodon (Not really a dinosaur but it would be cool to see)
Compsognathus
Pachycephalosaurus
Ankylosaurus
Camptosaurus
Deinonychus
Baryonyx
Deinosuchus
Hadrosaurus
Plesiosaur (Same with Dimetrodon)
Iguanodon
Muttaburrasaurus
Protoceratops

wow, how long do you want it to be  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: CanadianHero67 on Jan 05, 2008, 08:49:43 PM
Quote from: severen76 on Jan 05, 2008, 08:41:17 PM
Quote from: Ratchetcomand on Jan 05, 2008, 08:39:44 PM
Dinos i want to see in Jurassic Park 4

Tyrannosaurus
Velociraptor
Triceratops
Pteranodon
Brachiosaurus
Dilophosaurus
Stegosaurus
Allosaurus
Parasaurolophus
Dimetrodon (Not really a dinosaur but it would be cool to see)
Compsognathus
Pachycephalosaurus
Ankylosaurus
Camptosaurus
Deinonychus
Baryonyx
Deinosuchus
Hadrosaurus
Plesiosaur (Same with Dimetrodon)
Iguanodon
Muttaburrasaurus
Protoceratops

wow, how long do you want it to be  :D

There should also be Galliominus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jan 05, 2008, 08:57:40 PM
Quote from: severen76 on Jan 05, 2008, 08:41:17 PM
Quote from: Ratchetcomand on Jan 05, 2008, 08:39:44 PM
Dinos i want to see in Jurassic Park 4

Tyrannosaurus
Velociraptor
Triceratops
Pteranodon
Brachiosaurus
Dilophosaurus
Stegosaurus
Allosaurus
Parasaurolophus
Dimetrodon (Not really a dinosaur but it would be cool to see)
Compsognathus
Pachycephalosaurus
Ankylosaurus
Camptosaurus
Deinonychus
Baryonyx
Deinosuchus
Hadrosaurus
Plesiosaur (Same with Dimetrodon)
Iguanodon
Muttaburrasaurus
Protoceratops

wow, how long do you want it to be  :D

I just want to see more dinosaurs in this one, this will most likey be the last in the series. So i want it to be a big epic movie!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chopperbuilder on Jan 05, 2008, 11:05:48 PM
Nice seeing you Jurassic Park, sleep well night night
please lay that movie to rest  :D you cant draw more out of that consept with dinoes, so night night sleep well Jurassic Park !! ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Byohzrd on Jan 05, 2008, 11:38:43 PM
I personally would like to see Malcom come back i always thought he was a great character. I've heard that a Giganatosarus is supposedly the main dino. It was the biggest carnivorous dinosaur that walked on land.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: XenoVC on Jan 06, 2008, 02:33:10 AM
^Giganatosarus are Bigger than Tyrannosaurus Rex in Real life,But I want the T-rex to Be the main dino again!I can't believe a friggin fish eater killed it in JP3!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Major Alan Schaefer on Jan 06, 2008, 04:36:35 AM
I liked the Spino, T-Rex and Raptors should share it
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dark Passenger on Jan 06, 2008, 04:42:12 AM
the should have the rex and spino in the movie, but they should always have kept the threat of the rex the same, sure the spino is biger.....but in the movie if the characters mention the name t-rex you should amediately realize the reputation the rex has......
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Firetnk on Jan 06, 2008, 08:15:43 PM
I would like the Dilophosaurus (spiter) to come back and fight a Raptor. I want the Humans to actualy kill a dino. I still wish Robert Muldoon killed that Raptor and lived like he did in the book. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chopperbuilder on Jan 06, 2008, 08:32:40 PM
Then i ask you guys, would would be the story on it, that hasent all ready been told??
we came, we saw, we killed it, we left the island.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Jan 06, 2008, 08:34:39 PM
Quote from: Firetnk on Jan 06, 2008, 08:15:43 PM
I would like the Dilophosaurus (spiter) to come back and fight a Raptor. I want the Humans to actualy kill a dino. I still wish Robert Muldoon killed that Raptor and lived like he did in the book. ;D

I don't want to see any dino vs dino fights. They might look cool, but every movie nowadays seems be infected with the 'vs' bug.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Byohzrd on Jan 06, 2008, 08:45:06 PM
Quote from: Firetnk on Jan 06, 2008, 08:15:43 PM
I would like the Dilophosaurus (spiter) to come back and fight a Raptor. I want the Humans to actualy kill a dino. I still wish Robert Muldoon killed that Raptor and lived like he did in the book. ;D
The creature in jurrassic park was not a Dilophosaurus it resembled it, but a true Dilophsaurus was 20ft tall and didnt have the frill or spit. It was nothing more than a result of genetic tampering.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Firetnk on Jan 06, 2008, 11:54:07 PM
Yes it was a Dilophosaurus but it was short. Just like Raptors were tall in the movie but they are really short in real life, or their life. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: CanadianHero67 on Jan 06, 2008, 11:59:05 PM
 I don't want the raptors to look like the ones in Jp3. The raptors in Jp and Jp The Lost World looked better.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: vortep on Jan 07, 2008, 12:05:08 AM
Quote from: CanadianHero67 on Jan 06, 2008, 11:59:05 PM
I don't want the raptors to look like the ones in Jp3. The raptors in Jp and Jp The Lost World looked better.

Agree
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dachande on Jan 07, 2008, 12:06:40 AM
Quote from: Byohzrd on Jan 06, 2008, 08:45:06 PM
Quote from: Firetnk on Jan 06, 2008, 08:15:43 PM
I would like the Dilophosaurus (spiter) to come back and fight a Raptor. I want the Humans to actualy kill a dino. I still wish Robert Muldoon killed that Raptor and lived like he did in the book. ;D
The creature in jurrassic park was not a Dilophosaurus it resembled it, but a true Dilophsaurus was 20ft tall and didnt have the frill or spit. It was nothing more than a result of genetic tampering.

Dilos were actually round 10 foot, not 20
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hybrid PM on Jan 07, 2008, 12:12:27 AM
Utahraptor!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Firetnk on Jan 07, 2008, 12:30:52 AM
Dilophosaurus  was about 10 ft or so. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dasani on Jan 07, 2008, 03:00:48 AM
Anyone ever heard of Charles Knight? He painted scientifically incorrect pictures like these:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Laelaps_by_Charles_Knight.png

That's what I miss in Dino movies. Monstrous. Armored. Reptilian. Not leathery birds who get their asses kicked by nine year old girls. The new King Kong tried to bring that back, but that movie sucked...

Obrian. Harryhausen. These are the people who brough dinosaurs to life. Not anymore. Dinosaurs aren't ferocious monsters anymore. They're just cannon fodder for fangirls.

"RAPTORS ARE SO KAWII!!!!!!!" (Draws thirty pictures of naked raptor furries)  ::)

-Sighs and watches King Kong-

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dark Passenger on Jan 07, 2008, 02:15:00 PM
we gotta have marine dino's....
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: brad873 on Jan 08, 2008, 07:44:11 PM
i have heard that this film will be based on aquatic dinosaurs
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: WisePredator on Jan 08, 2008, 08:02:30 PM
Quote from: brad873 on Jan 08, 2008, 07:44:11 PM
i have heard that this film will be based on aquatic dinosaurs
Stan Winston de-bunked that rumor.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jan 08, 2008, 08:05:07 PM
And besides most aquatic animals during the dinosaurs time where not even dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: brad873 on Jan 08, 2008, 08:24:11 PM
i know that, its just eisyer to say they are dinosaures. it would be cool to have a lifelurodon  (spelling) floating around though
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dark Passenger on Jan 09, 2008, 08:56:12 AM
Quote from: brad873 on Jan 08, 2008, 08:24:11 PM
i know that, its just eisyer to say they are dinosaures. it would be cool to have a lifelurodon  (spelling) floating around though

i think its lipluradon.....
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Buz on Jan 09, 2008, 12:17:37 PM
I'm a big fan of dinosaurs chasing people. I grew up watching The monster of Hollow mountain and King Kong, so the JP movies just frackin rock for me. JP3, while shit, is still fun to watch just because people are being chased and eaten by dinosaurs. And that's cool.

But for the fourth, gotta have more Rex.

And anyone else think that the Dino Crisis games would make for a great movie?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: BlkSoul on Jan 09, 2008, 02:15:24 PM
Quote from: The Buz on Jan 09, 2008, 12:17:37 PM
I'm a big fan of dinosaurs chasing people. I grew up watching The monster of Hollow mountain and King Kong, so the JP movies just frackin rock for me. JP3, while shit, is still fun to watch just because people are being chased and eaten by dinosaurs. And that's cool.

But for the fourth, gotta have more Rex.

And anyone else think that the Dino Crisis games would make for a great movie?
Dino Crisis that was a nice game back in the day!!! and Would make a good movie
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Jan 10, 2008, 12:46:28 PM
Quote from: BlkSoul on Jan 09, 2008, 02:15:24 PM
Quote from: The Buz on Jan 09, 2008, 12:17:37 PM
I'm a big fan of dinosaurs chasing people. I grew up watching The monster of Hollow mountain and King Kong, so the JP movies just frackin rock for me. JP3, while shit, is still fun to watch just because people are being chased and eaten by dinosaurs. And that's cool.

But for the fourth, gotta have more Rex.

And anyone else think that the Dino Crisis games would make for a great movie?
Dino Crisis that was a nice game back in the day!!! and Would make a good movie

One of the scariëst games i played and the best, movie should be made  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: BlkSoul on Jan 10, 2008, 12:57:42 PM
Whe will see if they do make one it would be nice though
Title: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Zero on Feb 05, 2008, 08:13:56 PM
Supposedly comfirmed by Steven Spielberg that it was going to start to go back into production after Indiana Jones 4
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Cellien on Feb 05, 2008, 08:35:06 PM
Link?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 05, 2008, 08:35:25 PM
Freakin sweet!!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Feb 05, 2008, 08:38:55 PM
This topic has been made before http://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=990.0
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 05, 2008, 08:42:30 PM
JURASSIC PARK is my fav film of all time, I love them all, can't wait to for the 4th to finally be made.
I'm not kneen on the idea of aquatic dinos, I'd love to see the rexes back in force again, especially the female she was sooo kickass.

Malcolm needs a come back, and john hammond.
"welcome to JURASSIC PARK."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Cellien on Feb 05, 2008, 09:05:47 PM
Turok!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Master Chief on Feb 05, 2008, 09:09:15 PM
Quote from: Alien3 on Feb 05, 2008, 08:42:30 PM
especially the female she was sooo kickass.

I preferred the Bull Rex myself. It terrorized the hell out of the San Diego citizens.  But yes, they need to be back in the 4th installment.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 05, 2008, 09:12:17 PM
Quote from: Master Chief on Feb 05, 2008, 09:09:15 PM
Quote from: Alien3 on Feb 05, 2008, 08:42:30 PM
especially the female she was sooo kickass.

I preferred the Bull Rex myself. It terrorized the hell out of the San Diego citizens.  But yes, they need to be back in the 4th installment.

But the female was bigger and more sneaky, if she was placed in San Diego just think of the carge that would ensue, especially that Malcolm had her infant.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Feb 05, 2008, 09:24:38 PM
I want to see it take place in the city again, that was my favorite part in JP2.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 05, 2008, 09:28:59 PM
I still believe the CGI in the first jurassic park is the best ever seen on the cinema screen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: severen76 on Feb 05, 2008, 09:33:36 PM
Quote from: Alien3 on Feb 05, 2008, 09:28:59 PM
I still believe the CGI in the first jurassic park is the best ever seen on the cinema screen.

I dont know about the best anymore, but it was the most breathtaking
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Feb 05, 2008, 09:41:52 PM
It still good looking.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 05, 2008, 09:55:54 PM
also in jp3 they have robots and cgi raptors within one shot and you cant tell them apart, i think the jp series has some of the best cgi ever.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Feb 05, 2008, 09:59:11 PM
Jurassic Park has the best CGI in the eary 90's unlike some movie back then.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Zero on Feb 05, 2008, 10:21:59 PM
How about We take the uh,Charcharodontosaurus to interrupt a T-rex vs. Spino rematch and make it the main Dino.Or maybe A Gigantosaurus
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Iron Hide on Feb 05, 2008, 10:24:23 PM
Quote from: Ratchetcomand on Feb 05, 2008, 09:59:11 PM
Jurassic Park has the best CGI in the eary 90's unlike some movie back then.

yeah but now it's been snubbed out IMO by the V-rexs from King Kong....they looked so damn real.



and I hope they bring the Rex back,he was my favorite aspect about the JP movies,I went to the movies just to see the rex.It sucked that they killed that one off in the third movie just to make room for the spinosaurus  >:(.....which wasn't even that interesting.I would have liked JP3 ALOT more if it had been a rex chasing them around the whole movie instead of that spino-piece of shit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Feb 05, 2008, 10:38:31 PM
The T-Rex in King Kong 2005 did look great but there some parts of it that look fake.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Iron Hide on Feb 05, 2008, 10:48:54 PM
Quote from: Ratchetcomand on Feb 05, 2008, 10:38:31 PM
The T-Rex in King Kong 2005 did look great but there some parts of it that look fake.

psh whatever,King Kong had some of the best CGI I've ever seen,the V-rexs were amazing,it was like watching a live animal
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Feb 05, 2008, 10:50:26 PM
I think the T-rex in all 3 jurassic Park movies had the best desings.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Master Chief on Feb 05, 2008, 10:53:26 PM
Quote from: Iron Hide on Feb 05, 2008, 10:48:54 PM
Quote from: Ratchetcomand on Feb 05, 2008, 10:38:31 PM
The T-Rex in King Kong 2005 did look great but there some parts of it that look fake.

psh whatever,King Kong had some of the best CGI I've ever seen,the V-rexs were amazing,it was like watching a live animal

The only problem I had with the V-Rex was it's roar.  To me it just wasn't scary enough. Other than that, it was just what the MC ordered.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Feb 17, 2008, 06:39:26 PM
Anyone ever notice how the original Jurassic Park has the best CGI of any movie, even today? Not even the sequels' special effects were as good as JP. Spinosaurus looked fake in JP3.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Feb 17, 2008, 06:45:25 PM
Yeah, look at the CG from 1993 and compare it to the likes of 2005's Anacondas. It just makes you wonder.  ???
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ShadowPred on Feb 17, 2008, 06:46:35 PM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Feb 17, 2008, 06:39:26 PM
Anyone ever notice how the original Jurassic Park has the best CGI of any movie, even today? Not even the sequels' special effects were as good as JP. Spinosaurus looked fake in JP3.


Yes, it still amazes me to this day how no other film with cgi compares to it, none of them are close to what Jurassic Park pulled off.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Feb 17, 2008, 06:52:49 PM
King Kong is the only movie to surpase it and even it's graphics were iffy here and there.  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ShadowPred on Feb 17, 2008, 06:58:12 PM
King Kong, looked completely fake to me, Jurassic Park...harder to see the fakeness there, in my opinion.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Feb 17, 2008, 07:16:11 PM
Kong himself was unreal, the V-rexes look brillaint too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Feb 17, 2008, 07:17:25 PM
KK had good CGI, but JP still surpasses it. JP is the only movie where it is hard to tell what is CGI. It's the first attempt at creating CGI creatures, and the best attempt. Transformers is the only other film to come close to it.

All you have to do is watch the T-rex paddock scene. It is a flawless piece of special effects mastery.


Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: XenoVC on Feb 17, 2008, 07:24:31 PM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Feb 17, 2008, 07:17:25 PM
KK had good CGI, but JP still surpasses it. JP is the only movie where it is hard to tell what is CGI. It's the first attempt at creating CGI creatures, and the best attempt. Transformers is the only other film to come close to it.

All you have to do is watch the T-rex paddock scene. It is a flawless piece of special effects mastery.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGO7EHOuTwE


One of my favorite monster scenes EVER,geraldo is so dumb for going to the toilet to hide,when there is a friggin t-rex Breaking out of its paddock  :P ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ShadowPred on Feb 17, 2008, 07:35:54 PM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Feb 17, 2008, 07:17:25 PM
KK had good CGI, but JP still surpasses it. JP is the only movie where it is hard to tell what is CGI. It's the first attempt at creating CGI creatures, and the best attempt. Transformers is the only other film to come close to it.

All you have to do is watch the T-rex paddock scene. It is a flawless piece of special effects mastery.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGO7EHOuTwE



I still can't see the damn difference between cgi and animatronic at all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Feb 17, 2008, 07:40:27 PM
I know, it still wows me. How is it that in 1993 on their first try, ILM was able to create CGI dinosaurs that look so real, 15 years later, it still can't be matched, even by ILM themselves.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ShadowPred on Feb 17, 2008, 07:42:18 PM
It is just confusing. I look at this movie to this day and still say "WOW" ILM were either just lucky, or they knew just what the hell they were doing. But, like you say, how is it possible that it still can't be matched by the same people? I really have no clue.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Feb 17, 2008, 08:48:53 PM
Look at this picture. Those are CGI raptors, but they look completely real.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fen%2F6%2F69%2FJPvelociraptor.png&hash=f32795801a491eb62b75eae5a3ad867d3b6fe4c8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Der_Meister on Feb 17, 2008, 08:52:53 PM
I never tought that was CGI! amazing
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ShadowPred on Feb 17, 2008, 08:52:57 PM
DAMN YOU ILM!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: severen76 on Feb 17, 2008, 09:00:08 PM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Feb 17, 2008, 08:48:53 PM
Look at this picture. Those are CGI raptors, but they look completely real.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/69/JPvelociraptor.png


If I remember from the making of's those arent CGI  those are stop motion, they put those in because they were originally going to use stop motion animation but saw the cgi.

they didnt want to waste all the time spent on stop motion so the used it in that scene.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Feb 17, 2008, 09:32:48 PM
There is no stop motion in JP. They were going to use go-motion, but ILM discovered they could make realer looking dinos with CGI. If they were stop-motion, they would look like clay and move frame by frame, which they don't.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: fluxcap on Feb 17, 2008, 09:38:06 PM
lol this is what Jurassic Park 4 could have been if they stuck with that absurd script from awhile back.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi18.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fb129%2FChris_W%2Fdfh.jpg&hash=3c5aeaf96a7c492063d289b27d5e4863e4e575b2)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ShadowPred on Feb 17, 2008, 09:38:56 PM
My God...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Feb 17, 2008, 10:35:39 PM
Jurassic Park has the best looking dino's then most movies today. The T-rex looks more Real then the ones in King Kong 2005.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Feb 17, 2008, 11:09:51 PM
Yes it does.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Feb 17, 2008, 11:17:17 PM
The V-Rex's in KK weren't really meant to look real. Jackson said he wanted them to look like '30's monsters' and thats we he got.  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Feb 18, 2008, 12:07:32 AM
Of course they were meant to look real.

If he's talking about 30's monsters then he means they don't have to be accurate according to the fossil record.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Feb 18, 2008, 12:13:13 AM
Quote from: fluxcap on Feb 17, 2008, 09:38:06 PM
lol this is what Jurassic Park 4 could have been if they stuck with that absurd script from awhile back.

Thank got that didn't happen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Feb 18, 2008, 12:13:25 AM
Jackson wanted them to look real, but he wanted the designs to look more monsterish than realistic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Iron Hide on Feb 18, 2008, 12:20:45 AM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Feb 18, 2008, 12:13:25 AM
Jackson wanted them to look real, but he wanted the designs to look more monsterish than realistic.

Yeah, IMO the V-Rexs looked realier than any CGI I've seen to date,it was like watching an actual dinosaur on the national geographic channel,The T-rex from JP did look uber good and real but there were times where you could see the "shadow" that early CGI models had.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Feb 18, 2008, 01:17:19 AM
Indiana Jones 4 should be done soon, maybe we will some info soon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 18, 2008, 05:37:23 AM
I'd like this film to have more action from the herbivores. Like, have a scene where the humans are being chased by carnivores and get caught b/w a herd of Triceratops or Stegosaurs (or w/e) and the herbivores get defensive and end up protecting not only themselves, but the humans indirectly.

And a Spinosaurus vs. T.Rex fight done with a King Kong face-off would be nice. Like in the previews for the film, the V-Rex roars at Ann, then Kong jumps down and roars. I'd like to see Spino confront the humans, then Rex comes out from behind and roars at her. Then we get a jaw-to-jaw fight. Not some silly 10 second spin around like in JP 3.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dark Passenger on Feb 18, 2008, 09:58:42 AM
QuoteAnd a Spinosaurus vs. T.Rex fight done with a King Kong face-off would be nice. Like in the previews for the film, the V-Rex roars at Ann, then Kong jumps down and roars. I'd like to see Spino confront the humans, then Rex comes out from behind and roars at her. Then we get a jaw-to-jaw fight. Not some silly 10 second spin around like in JP 3.

nah im kinda sick of these spino vs trex face offs....too corny like... :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Feb 18, 2008, 11:52:05 AM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Feb 18, 2008, 12:13:25 AM
Jackson wanted them to look real, but he wanted the designs to look more monsterish than realistic.

Yeah thats what I meant. The design was to look monster like.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 18, 2008, 04:11:21 PM
Quote from: Cloverfield Monster on Feb 18, 2008, 09:58:42 AM
QuoteAnd a Spinosaurus vs. T.Rex fight done with a King Kong face-off would be nice. Like in the previews for the film, the V-Rex roars at Ann, then Kong jumps down and roars. I'd like to see Spino confront the humans, then Rex comes out from behind and roars at her. Then we get a jaw-to-jaw fight. Not some silly 10 second spin around like in JP 3.

nah im kinda sick of these spino vs trex face offs....too corny like... :-\

In JP3 it wasn't bad at first. Are you referring to the part where they roar at one another before they get into it?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: nexus on Feb 18, 2008, 04:23:47 PM
I wanna see someone get kileld due to runnin away from a carnivore but end up in between too triceratops who are lockin horns jockying for position in the herd









Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 18, 2008, 05:26:05 PM
Quote from: nexus on Feb 18, 2008, 04:23:47 PM
I wanna see someone get kileld due to runnin away from a carnivore but end up in between too triceratops who are lockin horns jockying for position in the herd

I'd be down for that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: nexus on Feb 18, 2008, 06:03:54 PM
ok had an idea for the premise.

alan grnat has become the spokesman for the DPA (dinosaur protection league) or something.
the organisation becomes aware that some rich guy has bought his g/f,wife,daughter or somefemale in his life who he wud do anything for....a dino as a pet.
they break in and recover the dino. its to be returned to the island. however when they get there something attacks the ship / lane they are in and they are once again stuck in jurassic park
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Feb 18, 2008, 06:18:48 PM
Thus proving why fans shouldn't write scripts. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Predator-S on Feb 18, 2008, 06:20:57 PM
Jurassic Park is one of my all time favourite movies, I love dinosaurs, grew up reading encyclopedias and watching documentaries. The first two movies are excellent but the third...omg such dissapointment. Even worse than AVP. That f**king Spino, I hate it so much and the f**ked up raptor desings. The whole movie is a disaster, there were like 1-2 good scenes in there. And the CGI looked totally fake, I mean JP came out in 1993 and JP 3 almost 10 years later and still looks 10 times better.

I don't want another movie because I know it's gonna be even more f**ked up. However I'm curious how bad can it get. Maybe there's a 5% it may turn out good but that would be sheer luck.

There was a thread on IMDB for intentional bad ideas that cracked me up, some really golden ones there. A lot of avp references too.

As for the dinos I want a rematch between T-Rex and Spino just to see the motherf**ker get what he deserves. I would like to see a Gigantosaurus, Argentinosaurus, Dimetrodon, Anchilosaurus and for mairne maybe Kronosaurus, Plesiosaurus, Tylosaurus, Lyopleurodon, Archelon, Megalodon, Archelon (the last ones aren't dinosaurs but would be cool as hell to have 'em).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Predator-S on Feb 18, 2008, 06:44:26 PM
http://imdb.com/title/tt0369610/board/flat/87012360?p=1

here's the thread  :D

Most of these ideas would make excellent parodies.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Feb 18, 2008, 06:53:41 PM
I don't hate JP3, and it definitely isn't as bad as AVP, but it was disappointing. Coming out of TLW, I loved it and thought it was a great sequel. Coming out of JP3, I was disappointed, mainly because T-rex got less then 2 minutes of screen time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 18, 2008, 07:28:00 PM
Quote from: Predator-S on Feb 18, 2008, 06:20:57 PM
Jurassic Park is one of my all time favourite movies, I love dinosaurs, grew up reading encyclopedias and watching documentaries. The first two movies are excellent but the third...omg such dissapointment. Even worse than AVP. That f**king Spino, I hate it so much and the f**ked up raptor desings. The whole movie is a disaster, there were like 1-2 good scenes in there. And the CGI looked totally fake, I mean JP came out in 1993 and JP 3 almost 10 years later and still looks 10 times better.

I don't want another movie because I know it's gonna be even more f**ked up. However I'm curious how bad can it get. Maybe there's a 5% it may turn out good but that would be sheer luck.

There was a thread on IMDB for intentional bad ideas that cracked me up, some really golden ones there. A lot of avp references too.

As for the dinos I want a rematch between T-Rex and Spino just to see the motherf**ker get what he deserves. I would like to see a Gigantosaurus, Argentinosaurus, Dimetrodon, Anchilosaurus and for mairne maybe Kronosaurus, Plesiosaurus, Tylosaurus, Lyopleurodon, Archelon, Megalodon, Archelon (the last ones aren't dinosaurs but would be cool as hell to have 'em).

For someone who grew up reading about dinosaurs I'm surprised to hear you say the raptor designs were f**ked up in JP3.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Feb 18, 2008, 08:50:55 PM
Who should write and direct JP4? So far Spielberg is the producer, why not the Strause bros to direct the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Feb 18, 2008, 11:18:26 PM
No way ^  :o

Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 18, 2008, 07:28:00 PM
Quote from: Predator-S on Feb 18, 2008, 06:20:57 PM
Jurassic Park is one of my all time favourite movies, I love dinosaurs, grew up reading encyclopedias and watching documentaries. The first two movies are excellent but the third...omg such dissapointment. Even worse than AVP. That f**king Spino, I hate it so much and the f**ked up raptor desings. The whole movie is a disaster, there were like 1-2 good scenes in there. And the CGI looked totally fake, I mean JP came out in 1993 and JP 3 almost 10 years later and still looks 10 times better.

I don't want another movie because I know it's gonna be even more f**ked up. However I'm curious how bad can it get. Maybe there's a 5% it may turn out good but that would be sheer luck.

There was a thread on IMDB for intentional bad ideas that cracked me up, some really golden ones there. A lot of avp references too.

As for the dinos I want a rematch between T-Rex and Spino just to see the motherf**ker get what he deserves. I would like to see a Gigantosaurus, Argentinosaurus, Dimetrodon, Anchilosaurus and for mairne maybe Kronosaurus, Plesiosaurus, Tylosaurus, Lyopleurodon, Archelon, Megalodon, Archelon (the last ones aren't dinosaurs but would be cool as hell to have 'em).

For someone who grew up reading about dinosaurs I'm surprised to hear you say the raptor designs were f**ked up in JP3.

I know, the designs in JP3 are most like they were in real-life. It was the original that f*cked them up, tall, colourless, featherless monsters.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Feb 18, 2008, 11:19:04 PM
No. They would be worse than Joe Johnson.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 18, 2008, 11:19:42 PM
Quote from: War Wager on Feb 18, 2008, 11:18:26 PM
No way ^  :o

Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 18, 2008, 07:28:00 PM
Quote from: Predator-S on Feb 18, 2008, 06:20:57 PM
Jurassic Park is one of my all time favourite movies, I love dinosaurs, grew up reading encyclopedias and watching documentaries. The first two movies are excellent but the third...omg such dissapointment. Even worse than AVP. That f**king Spino, I hate it so much and the f**ked up raptor desings. The whole movie is a disaster, there were like 1-2 good scenes in there. And the CGI looked totally fake, I mean JP came out in 1993 and JP 3 almost 10 years later and still looks 10 times better.

I don't want another movie because I know it's gonna be even more f**ked up. However I'm curious how bad can it get. Maybe there's a 5% it may turn out good but that would be sheer luck.

There was a thread on IMDB for intentional bad ideas that cracked me up, some really golden ones there. A lot of avp references too.

As for the dinos I want a rematch between T-Rex and Spino just to see the motherf**ker get what he deserves. I would like to see a Gigantosaurus, Argentinosaurus, Dimetrodon, Anchilosaurus and for mairne maybe Kronosaurus, Plesiosaurus, Tylosaurus, Lyopleurodon, Archelon, Megalodon, Archelon (the last ones aren't dinosaurs but would be cool as hell to have 'em).

For someone who grew up reading about dinosaurs I'm surprised to hear you say the raptor designs were f**ked up in JP3.

I know, the designs in JP3 are most like they were in real-life. It was the original that f*cked them up, tall, colourless, featherless monsters.

Not necessarily. The theory wasn't as widely accepted as it is today I believe.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Feb 18, 2008, 11:21:09 PM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Feb 18, 2008, 11:19:04 PM
No. They would be worse than Joe Johnson.

With Spielberg as the producer, i'm pretty sure he make sure that they woun't mess up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Feb 18, 2008, 11:23:50 PM
Speilberg's already meant to produce JP4. Anyway he was producer on JP3 and that didn't turn out too well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 18, 2008, 11:25:37 PM
Quote from: Ratchetcomand on Feb 18, 2008, 11:21:09 PM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Feb 18, 2008, 11:19:04 PM
No. They would be worse than Joe Johnson.

With Spielberg as the producer, i'm pretty sure he make sure that they woun't mess up.

What War Wager said...beat me to it lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Zero on Feb 18, 2008, 11:29:43 PM
JURASSIC PARK COMFIRMED TO GO ABCK INTO PRODUCTION AFTER INDIANA JONES IV IS RELEASED.SHOULD BE OUT NEAR MID '09! MILLIONS CHEER! STEVEN SPIELBERG SAID IT HIMSELF!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Feb 18, 2008, 11:36:18 PM
Do you have a link? If this is true then i'm happy  :).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Feb 18, 2008, 11:40:07 PM
Quote from: Ratchetcomand on Feb 18, 2008, 11:21:09 PM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Feb 18, 2008, 11:19:04 PM
No. They would be worse than Joe Johnson.

With Spielberg as the producer, i'm pretty sure he make sure that they woun't mess up.

How do you explain JP3 then?

Anyway, I think Joe did okay with JP3, it was the shallowness of the story and characters, and the dumb Spinosaurus that messed it up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Feb 18, 2008, 11:41:07 PM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Feb 18, 2008, 11:40:07 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 18, 2008, 11:25:37 PM
Quote from: Ratchetcomand on Feb 18, 2008, 11:21:09 PM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Feb 18, 2008, 11:19:04 PM
No. They would be worse than Joe Johnson.

With Spielberg as the producer, i'm pretty sure he make sure that they woun't mess up.

What War Wager said...beat me to it lol

How do you explain JP3 then?

Spielberg had nothing to do with JP3.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Feb 18, 2008, 11:42:25 PM
Spielberg produced it. He personally hired Joe because they had been working at ILM together for a very long time. Joe wanted to direct TLW, but Spielberg wanted to direct that, so he told Joe he could direct the 3rd film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Feb 18, 2008, 11:52:04 PM
But with Colin on the site, he can make the dinos look amazing again like they did in the first one.

Directors i want in JP4

Frank Darabont (The Mist, The Majestic)
Paul Verhoeven (Robocop, Starship Troopers)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: nexus on Feb 19, 2008, 09:48:50 AM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Feb 18, 2008, 06:18:48 PM
Thus proving why fans shouldn't write scripts. ;D

Any constructive critism of my idea?
would like to know what elements you dint like nad why
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Newsfop on Feb 19, 2008, 03:08:23 PM
Quote from: Ratchetcomand on Feb 18, 2008, 11:52:04 PM
Directors i want in JP4

Frank Darabont (The Mist, The Majestic)
Paul Verhoeven (Robocop, Starship Troopers)

Um, dude, Verhoeven is reknowned for making incredibly violent movies. The JP films were all PG-13. They were scary, but not total bloodbaths. You really think Verhoeven will want to rhein it back to fit the masses?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Feb 19, 2008, 03:37:36 PM
^Yeah but made great movies, if he did made a Jurassic park movie it would most likey be PG-13 because the studio would make it PG-13.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Newsfop on Feb 19, 2008, 04:14:47 PM
I hope he directs it as PG-13 should he get the chance rather than go for R then have to have it edited back.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Feb 19, 2008, 04:20:31 PM
I would have him to director or Robert Zemeckis. I would Say Guillermo del Toro but he busy with a lot of movies rigth now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Feb 19, 2008, 06:06:02 PM
Quote from: nexus on Feb 19, 2008, 09:48:50 AM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Feb 18, 2008, 06:18:48 PM
Thus proving why fans shouldn't write scripts. ;D

Any constructive critism of my idea?
would like to know what elements you dint like nad why

I just think the idea is kinda lame and cheesy. Not as bad as the dinos with guns idea (still can't believe people actually thought it was a good idea), we need something that actually furthers the story. That was the problem with JP3.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 19, 2008, 08:43:54 PM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Feb 19, 2008, 06:06:02 PM
Quote from: nexus on Feb 19, 2008, 09:48:50 AM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Feb 18, 2008, 06:18:48 PM
Thus proving why fans shouldn't write scripts. ;D

Any constructive critism of my idea?
would like to know what elements you dint like nad why

I just think the idea is kinda lame and cheesy. Not as bad as the dinos with guns idea (still can't believe people actually thought it was a good idea), we need something that actually furthers the story. That was the problem with JP3.

Aren't the dino-soldiers what Spielberg is pushing for?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Feb 20, 2008, 08:04:19 PM
I want the human roles to be better, in JP3 they feel like people who where just trying to surrvie from Spinosaurus and they feel like cardboard characters.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Warrior Angel on Feb 20, 2008, 09:16:23 PM
i was mad about T-Rex being killed in 3 but it only should how tough Spino is and plus maybe they got sick and tired about seeing the T-Rex as the main dino in each film you know....'it's not a franchise about the T-Rex' but what would be interesting is that T-Rex comes back near the end of the film like he did in Jurassic Park except we don't see him throught the whole movie until the very end so it'll be like a cliff-hanger into a JP5
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 20, 2008, 09:19:24 PM
Quote from: AvP4evr on Feb 20, 2008, 09:16:23 PM
i was mad about T-Rex being killed in 3 but it only should how tough Spino is and plus maybe they got sick and tired about seeing the T-Rex as the main dino in each film you know....'it's not a franchise about the T-Rex' but what would be interesting is that T-Rex comes back near the end of the film like he did in Jurassic Park except we don't see him throught the whole movie until the very end so it'll be like a cliff-hanger into a JP5

But the T.Rex getting killed in JP3 was B.S. b/c he had Spino by the neck. That's game over right there, but b/c the studio wanted to be gay, they turned things around.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Warrior Angel on Feb 20, 2008, 09:27:49 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 20, 2008, 09:19:24 PM
Quote from: AvP4evr on Feb 20, 2008, 09:16:23 PM
i was mad about T-Rex being killed in 3 but it only should how tough Spino is and plus maybe they got sick and tired about seeing the T-Rex as the main dino in each film you know....'it's not a franchise about the T-Rex' but what would be interesting is that T-Rex comes back near the end of the film like he did in Jurassic Park except we don't see him throught the whole movie until the very end so it'll be like a cliff-hanger into a JP5

But the T.Rex getting killed in JP3 was B.S. b/c he had Spino by the neck. That's game over right there, but b/c the studio wanted to be gay, they turned things around.

well actually it was just a cheap scate move...and i read on the internet that there will be feathered raptors and some bad guy created gentically mutated deniychus (There like raptors but 3x bigger) to be like mercinary killers and there will be a scene in the film where a group of people are being chased after by the raptors on motorcyles, and the people would jump off the a cliff and into the air to deploy there parachutes and escape to safety, also they'll introduce sea monsters
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Feb 20, 2008, 11:39:12 PM
See, I'm not against having Spinosaurus in a JP film. I'm all for new dinosaurs. But having the Spino replace the T-rex was stupid. There is no reason they can't both be in the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 21, 2008, 01:26:44 AM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Feb 20, 2008, 11:39:12 PM
See, I'm not against having Spinosaurus in a JP film. I'm all for new dinosaurs. But having the Spino replace the T-rex was stupid. There is no reason they can't both be in the film.

Agreed
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SiL on Feb 21, 2008, 01:30:48 AM
What about Giganotosaurus? That mother was huge.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: CanadianHero67 on Feb 21, 2008, 01:32:59 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 21, 2008, 01:26:44 AM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Feb 20, 2008, 11:39:12 PM
See, I'm not against having Spinosaurus in a JP film. I'm all for new dinosaurs. But having the Spino replace the T-rex was stupid. There is no reason they can't both be in the film.

Agreed

It was stupid to replace the rex with spino. They should have both in the movie (whole movie).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 21, 2008, 03:00:14 AM
Quote from: SiL on Feb 21, 2008, 01:30:48 AM
What about Giganotosaurus? That mother was huge.

Not much bigger than T.Rex and it's physical design isn't all that different. Spinosaurus at least had the sail and the crocodile-like skull which are very unique.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Feb 21, 2008, 03:33:00 AM


If there ever was a character I felt more sorry for, it's Eddie. Man, that sucks.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 21, 2008, 03:52:34 AM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Feb 21, 2008, 03:33:00 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qsoPs85lKo

If there ever was a character I felt more sorry for, it's Eddie. Man, that sucks.

Agreed. Poor fellow, didn't deserve that.

IT'S COZ HE WAS BALD WASN'T IT?!?!?!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dark Passenger on Feb 21, 2008, 08:54:14 AM
QuoteNot much bigger than T.Rex and it's physical design isn't all that different. Spinosaurus at least had the sail and the crocodile-like skull which are very unique.

Which happens to be a fish eater,  maybe its like in godzilla.....the people smelt like the fish....
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 21, 2008, 04:40:28 PM
Quote from: Cloverfield Monster on Feb 21, 2008, 08:54:14 AM
QuoteNot much bigger than T.Rex and it's physical design isn't all that different. Spinosaurus at least had the sail and the crocodile-like skull which are very unique.

Which happens to be a fish eater,  maybe its like in godzilla.....the people smelt like the fish....

Another reason why I believe it wouldn't be able to finish off a T.Rex. If it's teeth and claws are designed for capturing fish, how well could it latch on to a large predator?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Zero on Feb 22, 2008, 01:25:45 AM
Quote from: AvP4evr on Feb 20, 2008, 09:16:23 PM
i was mad about T-Rex being killed in 3 but it only should how tough Spino is and plus maybe they got sick and tired about seeing the T-Rex as the main dino in each film you know....'it's not a franchise about the T-Rex' but what would be interesting is that T-Rex comes back near the end of the film like he did in Jurassic Park except we don't see him throught the whole movie until the very end so it'll be like a cliff-hanger into a JP5

OR...

THE T-REX IS FIGHTING SPINO FOR A REMATCH WHEN...Tada! A Charcharodontosaurus comes out and bites the f**k out of the Spino and the T-Rex retreats!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Newsfop on Feb 22, 2008, 03:55:52 AM
I don't get the arguments against the spinosaur. In the first two movies, the t-rex was terrifying. It was just as much so in the third until it got its ass handed to it. I'm sensing a lot of reverence toward a killing dynamo. That would be like showing empathy toward the queen alien in A:Res because it's baby bitchslapped its face off. The only villainous class I've ever supported an honorable respect for is the predators, because they have a method to their destruction. (Though I'd still never want to meet one.) As for carninvorous creatures, I haven't any regrets over their getting slaughtered.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 22, 2008, 04:03:47 AM
Quote from: Newsfop on Feb 22, 2008, 03:55:52 AM
I don't get the arguments against the spinosaur. In the first two movies, the t-rex was terrifying. It was just as much so in the third until it got its ass handed to it. I'm sensing a lot of reverence toward a killing dynamo. That would be like showing empathy toward the queen alien in A:Res because it's baby bitchslapped its face off. The only villainous class I've ever supported an honorable respect for is the predators, because they have a method to their destruction. (Though I'd still never want to meet one.) As for carninvorous creatures, I haven't any regrets over their getting slaughtered.

I'm not against the Spinosaur. But I don't want it running around killing everything in sight b/c that's extremely unrealistic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Feb 22, 2008, 04:11:11 AM
To me, the Spino acted more like a monster than the others. It never slowed down and was always attacking. The T-rex acted more like an animal, slowing observing its situations and reacting more realistically.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 22, 2008, 04:12:02 AM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Feb 22, 2008, 04:11:11 AM
To me, the Spino acted more like a monster than the others. It never slowed down and was always attacking. The T-rex acted more like an animal, slowing observing its situations and reacting more realistically.

You can thank Jack-ass Horner for that, the consultant on the film. He's a Rex hater, it's no wonder it went down so easily.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Feb 22, 2008, 04:15:38 AM
I'd also put blame on Joe Johnson's direction. He did a great job with the raptors, but when it came to the Spino, he just had it roar and attack without thinking. No ambiance with the Spino at all. The T-rex in the first two was set up so perfectly. Rippling water and thunderous footsteps led to the amazing attack seen in JP. How was the Spino introduced? A roar, then he runs out eating Cooper. No tension.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 22, 2008, 04:24:45 AM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Feb 22, 2008, 04:15:38 AM
I'd also put blame on Joe Johnson's direction. He did a great job with the raptors, but when it came to the Spino, he just had it roar and attack without thinking. No ambiance with the Spino at all. The T-rex in the first two was set up so perfectly. Rippling water and thunderous footsteps let to the amazing attack seen in JP. How was the Spino introduced? A roar, then he runs out eating Cooper. No tension.

Not much tension I'd argue. Once Grant says "That sounds bigger" I was :o. The quick glance of the Spinosaur eating Cooper made me jump.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Feb 22, 2008, 04:59:48 AM


:D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dark Passenger on Feb 22, 2008, 09:58:43 AM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Feb 22, 2008, 04:15:38 AM
I'd also put blame on Joe Johnson's direction. He did a great job with the raptors, but when it came to the Spino, he just had it roar and attack without thinking. No ambiance with the Spino at all. The T-rex in the first two was set up so perfectly. Rippling water and thunderous footsteps led to the amazing attack seen in JP. How was the Spino introduced? A roar, then he runs out eating Cooper. No tension.

true true, jurrasic park worked well though because the only dinosaurs we'd have seen was a brachiosaurus, se when you use that tension for the rex it works.....i think with the spino they just wanted to get straight into it, but i agree it would have worked better with the right set  up....
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Feb 22, 2008, 11:49:55 AM
I don't know what tension they could have added to the Spinosaurs appearence. The could have had the water ripples again but then you find out it's a bigger dinosaur.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 22, 2008, 04:19:14 PM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Feb 22, 2008, 04:59:48 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--40RLF5UGo

:D

Rofl, that awesome. The toilet scene was jks.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Purebreedalien on Feb 24, 2008, 01:42:32 PM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Feb 22, 2008, 04:59:48 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--40RLF5UGo

:D
LMFAO!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chopperbuilder on Feb 24, 2008, 02:13:39 PM
Ha ha ha ha ha real funny. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Zero on Feb 24, 2008, 11:33:17 PM
Jp:Iv is rumored to go back into production after the release of Indiana IV
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 25, 2008, 01:41:06 AM
Quote from: Mr. Chet on Feb 24, 2008, 11:33:17 PM
Jp:Iv is rumored to go back into production after the release of Indiana IV

Makes sense since Spielberg will be free after that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Mar 09, 2008, 04:34:14 PM
Heres some fan posters a came across:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thesupermovie.com%2Fimages%2Fjurassic-park-4.jpg&hash=8c7f190aa0aa60fe764c12c95abcd954885b2d40)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.metalapple.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2008%2F01%2Fjurassic-park-4.gif&hash=decfd50b2b5123501aeea8035787a760450b1c69)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 09, 2008, 04:56:03 PM
I like the first one, it's ominous.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Zero on Mar 09, 2008, 07:18:49 PM
I am the master of Fan Posters


(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi259.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fhh292%2FMmZ_Avp%2FJurassicPARKIV.jpg&hash=5450866081d22f86daadbf78bd25e4ea6f98c7d5)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenokiller on Mar 09, 2008, 08:02:32 PM
Quote from: fluxcap on Apr 26, 2007, 07:07:43 PM
Easy, someone finds out John Hammond's underwater laboratory for sea-dino's. They plan ANOTHER expedition, they convince Alan Grant AGAIN to come along. They arrive, the guy with the big gun dies first and then a bunch of underwater shenanigans ensue (similar to Deep Blue Sea) with an eventual confrontation with a Kronosaurus. Eventually Grant makes it to the surface to be saved by a helicopter and the film will fade out AGAIN with pterodactyls flying alongside the helicopter while the Jurassic Park theme plays in the background. And there we have Jurassic Park 4: The Lost Undersea World  ;)
1, they aren't dinos so that would change a lot of things, 2 we don't need another jaws 3, 3 it should be a megalodon instead of kronosaurus if they did that. Big whale eating shark! Yeah!  ;D ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Private Hudson on Mar 09, 2008, 09:07:44 PM
Spitters, they hardly got any screen time in JP 1.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Mar 09, 2008, 09:44:04 PM
Quote from: Private Hudson on Mar 09, 2008, 09:07:44 PM
Spitters, they hardly got any screen time in JP 1.

Indeed, I would love to have the Dilophosaurs back. In fact, if I could pick one dino to bring back for the fourth film, it would be the Dilophosaurus.

Also: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENzoXXsxJMc

Awesome scene. Just wanted to post that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: nexus on Mar 10, 2008, 10:57:19 AM
Yea but lets have them proper sized like in the turok game
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dark Passenger on Mar 10, 2008, 10:59:05 AM
Quote from: nexus on Mar 10, 2008, 10:57:19 AM
Yea but lets have them proper sized like in the turok game

i agree,

i read somewhere that they changed the real sizeof the dilophosaurus because its size would rival t-rex for the "biggest" carnivore at jurrasic park...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 10, 2008, 03:41:49 PM
Quote from: Silver Surfer on Mar 10, 2008, 10:59:05 AM
Quote from: nexus on Mar 10, 2008, 10:57:19 AM
Yea but lets have them proper sized like in the turok game

i agree,

i read somewhere that they changed the real sizeof the dilophosaurus because its size would rival t-rex for the "biggest" carnivore at jurrasic park...

There's no way. Dilophosaurus was only 20ft long vs. T.Rex who was twice that length at least.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alienseseses on Mar 10, 2008, 03:44:15 PM
Bigger than T-Rex is Giganotosaurus, who looks like a T-Rex but is bigger.

The raptors were made bigger, more like Dinonychus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Mar 10, 2008, 04:08:53 PM
They need to bring back Dilophosaurus, and add Allosaurus, Carcharodontosaurus, and Acrocanthosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alienseseses on Mar 10, 2008, 04:15:43 PM
Carnotaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Mar 10, 2008, 04:18:10 PM
If you look at all the big carnivores, they all had tiny little arms like T-rex. Just saying...he ain't no scavenger.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 10, 2008, 04:32:11 PM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Mar 10, 2008, 04:18:10 PM
If you look at all the big carnivores, they all had tiny little arms like T-rex. Just saying...he ain't no scavenger.

No they didn't. The two carnivores with the smallest arms were T.Rex and Carnotaurus. All carnosaurs (save for Carnotaurus) had large, three-fingered arms. Bigger than those of T.Rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Mar 10, 2008, 04:45:14 PM
They are still small compared to the body.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.livescience.com%2Fimages%2Fig59_Carcharodontosaurus_09.jpg&hash=1a9536e2525d3465be18cbb6ceb988400d25c270)
Carcharontasaurus

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dinosavry.narod.ru%2Fakrokantosaur%2FjcjcAcrocanthosaurus.jpg&hash=22fae4d130f83b955409f03b9bb1d44f836862e2)
Acrocanthosaurus

These guys don't have the huge arms like Spino did. Yes, T-rex had the smallest, but there were plenty others that had wimpy arms too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Cellien on Mar 10, 2008, 05:01:17 PM
Random JP thought:  "That is one big pile of shit." Loved that line!   :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 10, 2008, 05:10:24 PM
Quote from: Cellien on Mar 10, 2008, 05:01:17 PM
Random JP thought:  "That is one big pile of shit." Loved that line!   :P

"Woman inherits the Earth". Musta pleased feminists the world over.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenokiller on Mar 11, 2008, 12:25:16 AM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Mar 10, 2008, 04:45:14 PM
They are still small compared to the body.

http://images.livescience.com/images/ig59_Carcharodontosaurus_09.jpg
Carcharontasaurus

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dinosavry.narod.ru%2Fakrokantosaur%2FjcjcAcrocanthosaurus.jpg&hash=22fae4d130f83b955409f03b9bb1d44f836862e2)
Acrocanthosaurus

These guys don't have the huge arms like Spino did. Yes, T-rex had the smallest, but there were plenty others that had wimpy arms too.

Spinos arms are still pathetic, it was a fish eater, not strong, would lose to rex
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dark Passenger on Mar 11, 2008, 11:46:51 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 10, 2008, 03:41:49 PM
Quote from: Silver Surfer on Mar 10, 2008, 10:59:05 AM
Quote from: nexus on Mar 10, 2008, 10:57:19 AM
Yea but lets have them proper sized like in the turok game

i agree,

i read somewhere that they changed the real sizeof the dilophosaurus because its size would rival t-rex for the "biggest" carnivore at jurrasic park...

There's no way. Dilophosaurus was only 20ft long vs. T.Rex who was twice that length at least.

honestly, t-rex looked great cause he was the largest carnivore there compared to the velociraptor, but t-rex still wouldnt have had that size difference compared to a real sized dilphosaurus, ps. i never said dilophosaurus was as big as a t-rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 11, 2008, 03:18:28 PM
Quote from: Silver Surfer on Mar 11, 2008, 11:46:51 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 10, 2008, 03:41:49 PM
Quote from: Silver Surfer on Mar 10, 2008, 10:59:05 AM
Quote from: nexus on Mar 10, 2008, 10:57:19 AM
Yea but lets have them proper sized like in the turok game

i agree,

i read somewhere that they changed the real sizeof the dilophosaurus because its size would rival t-rex for the "biggest" carnivore at jurrasic park...

There's no way. Dilophosaurus was only 20ft long vs. T.Rex who was twice that length at least.

honestly, t-rex looked great cause he was the largest carnivore there compared to the velociraptor, but t-rex still wouldnt have had that size difference compared to a real sized dilphosaurus, ps. i never said dilophosaurus was as big as a t-rex.

I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm saying Universal would be stupid in thinking Dilophosaurus would rival a T.Rex in terms of size.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Mar 11, 2008, 03:48:29 PM
That wouldn't be possible seeing as how Dilophosaurus was smaller than T-rex.

But it's no doubt that the one in JP should be bigger. But maybe it was a youngin.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Mar 11, 2008, 07:29:24 PM
I guess the Raptors were super, super old then. ^  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: UltimateHunter on Mar 11, 2008, 08:08:46 PM
the lost undersea world?? i dont think so . t rex was the big threat in the first to shouldve been the big threat in the third or atleast more of one .. i think t rex deserves a comback. . why sea tho .. thats to boring. more action onland
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Zero on Mar 11, 2008, 08:32:40 PM
Quote from: UltimateHunter on Mar 11, 2008, 08:08:46 PM
the lost undersea world?? i dont think so . t rex was the big threat in the first to shouldve been the big threat in the third or atleast more of one .. i think t rex deserves a comback. . why sea tho .. thats to boring. more action onland

Atleast give the Spinosaurus a cool wat to die in JP iv
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Master Chief on Mar 11, 2008, 08:37:19 PM
How about letting it be eaten by a Kronosaurus...that would look 'cool'.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dark Passenger on Mar 12, 2008, 10:21:54 AM
QuoteI'm not saying you're wrong. I'm saying Universal would be stupid in thinking Dilophosaurus would rival a T.Rex in terms of size.

true, maybe im just remembering wrong, i think its cause it would have been a rival predator, like instead of the big t-rex and smaller velociraptor the dilphosaurus would have been trying to eat people as well...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 12, 2008, 03:14:03 PM
Quote from: Silver Surfer on Mar 12, 2008, 10:21:54 AM
QuoteI'm not saying you're wrong. I'm saying Universal would be stupid in thinking Dilophosaurus would rival a T.Rex in terms of size.

true, maybe im just remembering wrong, i think its cause it would have been a rival predator, like instead of the big t-rex and smaller velociraptor the dilphosaurus would have been trying to eat people as well...

I'm a dino nut, so realistically that wouldn't have been a problem b/c Dilophosaurus is widely believed to have been a scavenger due to its weak jaws. But ya :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MrLee on Mar 12, 2008, 03:23:32 PM
there was nothing more freaky when i was younger than 2 movie scenes.

Terminator 2, when its looking over the wasteland and the foot suddenly comes down crushing the skull.

And Jurassic Park scene with the t-rex bashing the car about and the "cant turn it off, cant turn it off" scene. (which may i add is hilariously parodied in waynes world 2)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 12, 2008, 03:26:59 PM
Quote from: mrlee on Mar 12, 2008, 03:23:32 PM
there was nothing more freaky when i was younger than 2 movie scenes.

Terminator 2, when its looking over the wasteland and the foot suddenly comes down crushing the skull.

And Jurassic Park scene with the t-rex bashing the car about and the "cant turn it off, cant turn it off" scene. (which may i add is hilariously parodied in waynes world 2)



I first saw JP in theatres when I was 6. The raptor attacking Ellie scene in the power shack scared me so much, I jumped down to the floor and hid behind the seats in front of me ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Master Chief on Mar 12, 2008, 03:31:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 12, 2008, 03:14:03 PM
Quote from: Silver Surfer on Mar 12, 2008, 10:21:54 AM
QuoteI'm not saying you're wrong. I'm saying Universal would be stupid in thinking Dilophosaurus would rival a T.Rex in terms of size.

true, maybe im just remembering wrong, i think its cause it would have been a rival predator, like instead of the big t-rex and smaller velociraptor the dilphosaurus would have been trying to eat people as well...

I'm a dino nut, so realistically that wouldn't have been a problem b/c Dilophosaurus is widely believed to have been a scavenger due to its weak jaws. But ya :P

If it was around 20ft long and weighed ½ a ton, do you think it would have a problem eating a human?  I shall call you the Jack Horner of the Dilo's... ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 12, 2008, 03:52:18 PM
UGH! I feel dirty... >:( how dare you!

What I said is fact though. I said Dilophosaurus is bellieved to have been primarily a scavenger due to its weak jaws. Though it's also believed it could've hunted and brought down small prey.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Master Chief on Mar 12, 2008, 04:03:11 PM
:D

How could it be fact if it is only believed?  Human would be considered small prey and I'm sure it would have no problem taking you out.  Me on the other hand...

Do you have a pic of what the Dilo was believed to look like?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Mar 12, 2008, 04:16:56 PM
He said it is a fact it is believed, not that it is a fact.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 12, 2008, 04:23:54 PM
Quote from: Master Chief on Mar 12, 2008, 04:03:11 PM
:D

How could it be fact if it is only believed?  Human would be considered small prey and I'm sure it would have no problem taking you out.  Me on the other hand...

Do you have a pic of what the Dilo was believed to look like?


(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2Fthumb%2F3%2F33%2FDilophosaurus.jpg%2F628px-Dilophosaurus.jpg&hash=f0de9c7cd341c7057d0c7f1488b1a49477cf2c3f)

It's believed Dilophosaurus couldn't hunt large prey b/c again, due to its weak jaws, it wouldn't be able to pin down and properly subdue struggling prey.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Mar 12, 2008, 04:25:35 PM
If only it had that venomous spit from JP.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Master Chief on Mar 12, 2008, 04:39:55 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 12, 2008, 04:23:54 PM
It's believed Dilophosaurus couldn't hunt large prey b/c again, due to its weak jaws, it wouldn't be able to pin down and properly subdue struggling prey.

In which it wouldn't need to because wasn't it also believed that it had the bite similar to our Komodo Dragons of today?  Just one bite and let the bacteria do the rest.  Imagine that kind of death in a JP movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Mar 12, 2008, 04:43:14 PM
Actually, that's supposed to be how the Compy's were like, hence why Deiter started to slow down in TLW before being eaten. Plus, it makes sense since Compy's were supposedly scavengers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Master Chief on Mar 12, 2008, 04:55:20 PM
That actually does make sense.  I always wondered why he had a hard time moving around after they attacked him. As for the Dilo, didn't they get the idea of it spitting venom because of its bite?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Mar 12, 2008, 05:13:23 PM
I don't know, but Crichton added it for dramatic effect.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 12, 2008, 06:09:49 PM
Quote from: Master Chief on Mar 12, 2008, 04:55:20 PM
That actually does make sense.  I always wondered why he had a hard time moving around after they attacked him. As for the Dilo, didn't they get the idea of it spitting venom because of its bite?

No. It was simply their idea. The frill probably came from the Australian frilled lizard.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Zero on Mar 12, 2008, 09:42:00 PM
Quote from: Master Chief on Mar 12, 2008, 04:55:20 PM
That actually does make sense.  I always wondered why he had a hard time moving around after they attacked him. As for the Dilo, didn't they get the idea of it spitting venom because of its bite?

Ingen's gene splicing caused it.They didn't have enough DNA to complete it so they added modern lizard Dna,resulting in an abnormal venemous spit
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Mar 12, 2008, 10:28:11 PM
Ummm...that's not how it is explained in the book or movie, but it works.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Zero on Mar 12, 2008, 10:40:46 PM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Mar 12, 2008, 10:28:11 PM
Ummm...that's not how it is explained in the book or movie, but it works.
I never read the book
The movie does not state

This information came from a game,so It may not be true. JP:OG Dino Encyclopedia
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dark Passenger on Mar 15, 2008, 11:15:40 PM
Quote from: Zero on Mar 12, 2008, 10:40:46 PM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Mar 12, 2008, 10:28:11 PM
Ummm...that's not how it is explained in the book or movie, but it works.
I never read the book
The movie does not state

This information came from a game,so It may not be true. JP:OG Dino Encyclopedia

if it came from a game is aint cannon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Mar 16, 2008, 12:17:38 AM
No, but it's a good reason. I'm sure it'll be implied in IV.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alienseseses on Mar 16, 2008, 01:33:40 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 11, 2008, 03:18:28 PM
Quote from: Silver Surfer on Mar 11, 2008, 11:46:51 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 10, 2008, 03:41:49 PM
Quote from: Silver Surfer on Mar 10, 2008, 10:59:05 AM
Quote from: nexus on Mar 10, 2008, 10:57:19 AM
Yea but lets have them proper sized like in the turok game

i agree,

i read somewhere that they changed the real sizeof the dilophosaurus because its size would rival t-rex for the "biggest" carnivore at jurrasic park...

There's no way. Dilophosaurus was only 20ft long vs. T.Rex who was twice that length at least.

honestly, t-rex looked great cause he was the largest carnivore there compared to the velociraptor, but t-rex still wouldnt have had that size difference compared to a real sized dilphosaurus, ps. i never said dilophosaurus was as big as a t-rex.

I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm saying Universal would be stupid in thinking Dilophosaurus would rival a T.Rex in terms of size.
Maybe what we saw was a baby.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 16, 2008, 01:37:35 AM
^^ Very unlikely given the size of the crests. A juvenile's head crests wouldn't be so developed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dark Passenger on Mar 16, 2008, 09:41:25 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 16, 2008, 01:37:35 AM
^^ Very unlikely given the size of the crests. A juvenile's head crests wouldn't be so developed.

how do you know, have you seen one grow up?
and obviously they in-acurately showed the size of a dilophosaurus..
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 16, 2008, 02:44:13 PM
It's just basic biology man. In a young animal with headgear, the headgear doesn't fully develop until it reaches maturity, usually around adolescence or so. If the Dilophosaurus was a juvenile in the film, it's crests would not have been so large.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dark Passenger on Mar 17, 2008, 05:17:19 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 16, 2008, 02:44:13 PM
It's just basic biology man. In a young animal with headgear, the headgear doesn't fully develop until it reaches maturity, usually around adolescence or so. If the Dilophosaurus was a juvenile in the film, it's crests would not have been so large.

depends what the head gear is for..
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 17, 2008, 05:24:37 AM
Mating most likely. They were too fragile for fighting.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dark Passenger on Mar 17, 2008, 09:03:03 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 17, 2008, 05:24:37 AM
Mating most likely. They were too fragile for fighting.

which might mean they would need to be finished developing near there teens..
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 17, 2008, 02:44:32 PM
Come teenage years, I think Dilophosaurus would be at least 10-13 ft long.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Mar 18, 2008, 03:40:58 AM


Pretty interesting. JP has so many mistakes in it, it's weird how I never notice most of them.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 18, 2008, 03:45:41 AM
Well come on, it's just a movie. Nothing's perfect. Every film has mistakes. There was film made in the 1960s I believe set in Roman times, yet if you look closely, you'll notice a shot of VW Beetle in the background.

Now if you want the lowdown on why the dinosaurs were messed up, I can provide that for you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Mar 18, 2008, 03:55:01 AM
JP has a lot more mistakes then most films though. I still love the movie.

And yes, I know they were really Deinonychus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Weasel on Mar 18, 2008, 04:03:16 AM
JP4 needs to be incredibly good. Because the last two were a complete let down. Plus the fact that the f**king spino was king in III pissed me off. If you do your dino research, spino was more of fish eating dinosaur. They need to be bring back the fear.

Jurassic Park was good for many reasons. But I love the fact that it had all this stuff going on. The dinosaurs getting lose and the conspiracy on the inside. The raining aspect that created the effect of despair not only by fear of dinosaurs but by the wear of the elements. By this I mean scenes like the car falling out of the tree or when Dennis gets lost trying to escape.

JP2 had an alright idea, it just wasn't...good. The scene with the girl using gymnastics to kill a Raptor is one of the worse scenes in a movie I've ever seen.

JP3 had some redeeming qualities, but again was just not good, didn't have what the first one did.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightwalker on Mar 18, 2008, 05:00:18 AM
i think its all been done already and there is no need for it..it'll be exactly the same as the others ::)
why bother? cgi nonsense.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hybrid PM on Mar 18, 2008, 05:40:40 PM
Quote from: Weasel on Mar 18, 2008, 04:03:16 AM
JP4 needs to be incredibly good. Because the last two were a complete let down. Plus the fact that the f**king spino was king in III pissed me off. If you do your dino research, spino was more of fish eating dinosaur. They need to be bring back the fear.


JP2 had an alright idea, it just wasn't...good. The scene with the girl using gymnastics to kill a Raptor is one of the worse scenes in a movie I've ever seen.



I thought Lost World was amazing up until that scene with the gymnastics, then I got really pissed off.

JP Best movie in franchise, its in my top five movies of all time, even with its mistakes.

LW Not as good as 1, but it was good to say the least, except that one gymnastics part.

JP3 Way too short, I believe it was 1 hour 23 minutes to be exact. Also T-Rex got f*cked in it, I'll compare it to Ving Rhames butt scene in Pulp Fiction. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 18, 2008, 05:45:16 PM
I hated in Jurassic Park III that they got rid of the theme park and biological issues that the first two movies had.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Iron Hide on Mar 18, 2008, 05:49:22 PM
Quote from: Weasel on Mar 18, 2008, 04:03:16 AM
JP4 needs to be incredibly good. Because the last two were a complete let down. Plus the fact that the f**king spino was king in III pissed me off. If you do your dino research, spino was more of fish eating dinosaur. They need to be bring back the fear.

Jurassic Park was good for many reasons. But I love the fact that it had all this stuff going on. The dinosaurs getting lose and the conspiracy on the inside. The raining aspect that created the effect of despair not only by fear of dinosaurs but by the wear of the elements. By this I mean scenes like the car falling out of the tree or when Dennis gets lost trying to escape.

JP2 had an alright idea, it just wasn't...good. The scene with the girl using gymnastics to kill a Raptor is one of the worse scenes in a movie I've ever seen.

JP3 had some redeeming qualities, but again was just not good, didn't have what the first one did.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.acc.umu.se%2F%7Ezqad%2Fcats%2F1161382098-1160972893210.b.jpg&hash=8d9eaa3533d42a62fee2d1bb584e22ae9fecef19)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Mar 18, 2008, 05:52:04 PM
I enjoy all of them. I like the first two the best, but JP3 is a fun popcorn movie. It has an energy to it that makes it fun, regardless of the crap they pulled with offing Rex.

JP and TLW further the story. JP3 exists just to see dinosaurs again.

And despite it's length, which surprisingly is shorter then both AVP movies, it doesn't feel as short as those. Why? Because JP3 has pacing, it delivers the goods. The AVP films can't even deliver in the action department.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 18, 2008, 09:01:59 PM
Quote from: Hybrid PM on Mar 18, 2008, 05:40:40 PM

I thought Lost World was amazing up until that scene with the gymnastics, then I got really pissed off.



What didn't you like about it? I thought it was well-done.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenokiller on Mar 18, 2008, 10:26:05 PM
I don't know about Hybrid PM but i didn't like that she killed the raptor. :( ANGRY >:( >:(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hybrid PM on Mar 18, 2008, 11:08:57 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 18, 2008, 09:01:59 PM
Quote from: Hybrid PM on Mar 18, 2008, 05:40:40 PM

I thought Lost World was amazing up until that scene with the gymnastics, then I got really pissed off.



What didn't you like about it? I thought it was well-done.

Just the fact that the girl was able to kick the raptor out the window with brut force and kill it, it just didnt look right, but if i remember correctly it got a huge pop from the audience.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 18, 2008, 11:41:35 PM
Quote from: Hybrid PM on Mar 18, 2008, 11:08:57 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 18, 2008, 09:01:59 PM
Quote from: Hybrid PM on Mar 18, 2008, 05:40:40 PM

I thought Lost World was amazing up until that scene with the gymnastics, then I got really pissed off.



What didn't you like about it? I thought it was well-done.

Just the fact that the girl was able to kick the raptor out the window with brut force and kill it, it just didnt look right, but if i remember correctly it got a huge pop from the audience.

It looked like she was coming at it pretty quickly so the force of the hit doesn't surprise me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Mar 19, 2008, 01:35:08 AM
I love TLW, and yes, I think Kelly kicking a raptor out a window using gymnastics is lame.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hybrid PM on Mar 19, 2008, 03:40:06 AM
So whats the latest on JP4, when is it suppost to go into production? Last I heard Laura Dern is coming back but thats old news.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: vortep on Mar 19, 2008, 01:47:06 PM
Quote from: Hybrid PM on Mar 19, 2008, 03:40:06 AM
So whats the latest on JP4, when is it suppost to go into production? Last I heard Laura Dern is coming back but thats old news.


Only a rumor
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Huol on Mar 20, 2008, 12:27:01 AM
I despise Kelly kicking the raptor out the window.

Much less her yelling "Hey, you!" to distract it...

Although the scene before that where the raptors are hunting them is sweet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Zero on Mar 20, 2008, 12:32:25 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 18, 2008, 11:41:35 PM
Quote from: Hybrid PM on Mar 18, 2008, 11:08:57 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 18, 2008, 09:01:59 PM
Quote from: Hybrid PM on Mar 18, 2008, 05:40:40 PM

I thought Lost World was amazing up until that scene with the gymnastics, then I got really pissed off.



What didn't you like about it? I thought it was well-done.

Just the fact that the girl was able to kick the raptor out the window with brut force and kill it, it just didnt look right, but if i remember correctly it got a huge pop from the audience.

It looked like she was coming at it pretty quickly so the force of the hit doesn't surprise me.


Does anyone remember the Raptor falling on a Spike?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: severen76 on Mar 20, 2008, 12:33:58 AM
Yep, I remember it getting impaled on a piece of wood I think.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 20, 2008, 12:42:43 AM
Quote from: Zero on Mar 20, 2008, 12:32:25 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 18, 2008, 11:41:35 PM
Quote from: Hybrid PM on Mar 18, 2008, 11:08:57 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 18, 2008, 09:01:59 PM
Quote from: Hybrid PM on Mar 18, 2008, 05:40:40 PM

I thought Lost World was amazing up until that scene with the gymnastics, then I got really pissed off.



What didn't you like about it? I thought it was well-done.

Just the fact that the girl was able to kick the raptor out the window with brut force and kill it, it just didnt look right, but if i remember correctly it got a huge pop from the audience.

It looked like she was coming at it pretty quickly so the force of the hit doesn't surprise me.


Does anyone remember the Raptor falling on a Spike?

I do. I think people are complaining about the actual kicking though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on Mar 22, 2008, 12:30:03 AM
i didn't really care how kelly killed it but when it happened i was like "haha i thought that you were smart". :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 22, 2008, 12:32:23 AM
Do you think we will see a teaser trailer in Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on Mar 22, 2008, 12:35:44 AM
If they do it probably won't be for a while.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Zero on Mar 22, 2008, 12:44:20 AM
The Trailer's already out..
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on Mar 22, 2008, 12:47:47 AM
really? huh i've never seen it. ???
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Mar 22, 2008, 12:55:57 AM
Quote from: Zero on Mar 22, 2008, 12:44:20 AM
The Trailer's already out..

JPIV they're talking about...  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 22, 2008, 12:58:24 AM
A teaser with Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is likey because Steven Spielberg
said he will work on the movie after Indiana Jones 4.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Mar 22, 2008, 01:07:13 AM
It would be nice to see one, but it's highly unlikely. They haven't even green lighted the movie in the first place.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 23, 2008, 04:05:35 AM
This discussion is starting to feel like AvP:R pre, pre, pre-production lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: WarMachine on Mar 25, 2008, 02:03:50 AM
Damn no Sam Neill.
T-Rex should be the main deal
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 25, 2008, 02:42:48 AM
Seriously? No Sam Neill??
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Huol on Mar 25, 2008, 03:35:02 AM
Heres my standing on this movie, what i would do.


Bring back the original cast. Sam Niell, Jeff Goldblum, Laura Dern and Richard Attenborough. (The latter probably as a cameo)

Have it set on Isla Nublar.

Revert the Raptors to the original brown colouring. Face it, nobody likes the modern accurate feathered dinosaurs.

Put effort into the CGI and animatronics. Seriously i just watched JPIII and i can safely say the animatronics on he spino was just... Ugh, the cgi also looked tacky. (the raptors where awesome however)


Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Mar 25, 2008, 03:57:26 AM
Isla Nublar has nothing on it.

In the boardroom deleted scene in TLW, Ludlow says how assets on Nublar, both organic and inorganic, have been liquidated.

Yes, it is a deleted scene, but still...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Huol on Mar 25, 2008, 04:06:52 AM
Deleted scenes do not exist in the canon.

As it stands, Isla Nublar is still infested with dinosaurs that are breeding in the remains of the park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hybrid PM on Mar 25, 2008, 04:27:09 AM
Quote from: Huol on Mar 25, 2008, 04:06:52 AM
Deleted scenes do not exist in the canon.

As it stands, Isla Nublar is still infested with dinosaurs that are breeding in the remains of the park.


True statement.

If they wanted it canon they would have added it back into the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Mar 25, 2008, 04:28:53 AM
But that is not the reason that scene was deleted. It was deleted because of pacing and redundancy.

If the writers wish to go back and confirm what Ludlow said is true, they can, or they don't have too, because it is deleted. We shall see, though most likely it will not be answered.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Huol on Mar 25, 2008, 07:40:38 AM
Ah but look at Aliens.

Remember the deleted scene which has Ripley find Burke cocooned in the hive?

Same thing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 25, 2008, 02:48:40 PM
Quote from: Huol on Mar 25, 2008, 07:40:38 AM
Ah but look at Aliens.

Remember the deleted scene which has Ripley find Burke cocooned in the hive?

Same thing.

Really?? That's not in the extended version, interesting.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 25, 2008, 04:30:23 PM
Stan Winston is returning is which good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Private Hudson on Mar 25, 2008, 11:49:44 PM
I really want it to be adventure like, like the first.

PS: Nice pic in your avatar Yellow Alien.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Weasel on Mar 26, 2008, 12:06:34 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 18, 2008, 09:01:59 PM
Quote from: Hybrid PM on Mar 18, 2008, 05:40:40 PM

I thought Lost World was amazing up until that scene with the gymnastics, then I got really pissed off.



What didn't you like about it? I thought it was well-done.

The story was good, but it doesn't compete to something like JP1. I didn't really like the whole baby t-rex thing, it was stupid. And pretty much from the gymnastic thing on, the movie sucks. All with them going to San Diego and all that garbage. Plus they made Ian Malcom not as crazy and interesting, they downplayed his eccentric scientist and made him into 'protector dad'.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Weasel on Mar 26, 2008, 12:09:28 AM
Quote from: fluxcap on Apr 26, 2007, 07:07:43 PM
Easy, someone finds out John Hammond's underwater laboratory for sea-dino's. They plan ANOTHER expedition, they convince Alan Grant AGAIN to come along. They arrive, the guy with the big gun dies first and then a bunch of underwater shenanigans ensue (similar to Deep Blue Sea) with an eventual confrontation with a Kronosaurus. Eventually Grant makes it to the surface to be saved by a helicopter and the film will fade out AGAIN with pterodactyls flying alongside the helicopter while the Jurassic Park theme plays in the background. And there we have Jurassic Park 4: The Lost Undersea World  ;)

The rumor I heard is that they all come to the USA or something and run amok like in Lost World. Which is just terrible.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 26, 2008, 12:11:14 AM
I love in Lost world when the Dino's destory the city, it was awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Huol on Mar 26, 2008, 01:41:21 AM
Quote from: Weasel on Mar 26, 2008, 12:06:34 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 18, 2008, 09:01:59 PM
Quote from: Hybrid PM on Mar 18, 2008, 05:40:40 PM

I thought Lost World was amazing up until that scene with the gymnastics, then I got really pissed off.



What didn't you like about it? I thought it was well-done.

The story was good, but it doesn't compete to something like JP1. I didn't really like the whole baby t-rex thing, it was stupid. And pretty much from the gymnastic thing on, the movie sucks. All with them going to San Diego and all that garbage. Plus they made Ian Malcom not as crazy and interesting, they downplayed his eccentric scientist and made him into 'protector dad'.

That makes sense. Being thrown through the air by a T-rex will suck the fun out of you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on Mar 26, 2008, 01:44:57 AM
You do have a point there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Mar 26, 2008, 01:55:06 AM
Quote from: Weasel on Mar 26, 2008, 12:06:34 AM

The story was good, but it doesn't compete to something like JP1. I didn't really like the whole baby t-rex thing, it was stupid. And pretty much from the gymnastic thing on, the movie sucks. All with them going to San Diego and all that garbage. Plus they made Ian Malcom not as crazy and interesting, they downplayed his eccentric scientist and made him into 'protector dad'.

I love the baby T-rex stuff. That is all from the novel, which I just read. Shame some of the stuff in the book didn't make it. At least the baby rex and trailer stuff was left pretty much intact.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 26, 2008, 02:03:35 AM
I love the Baby t-rex, i used to have a stuff animal of it when i was little.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on Mar 26, 2008, 08:53:42 PM
I had one of those too, but my mom sold it in a yardsale. :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hybrid PM on Mar 27, 2008, 04:56:07 AM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Mar 26, 2008, 01:55:06 AM
Quote from: Weasel on Mar 26, 2008, 12:06:34 AM

The story was good, but it doesn't compete to something like JP1. I didn't really like the whole baby t-rex thing, it was stupid. And pretty much from the gymnastic thing on, the movie sucks. All with them going to San Diego and all that garbage. Plus they made Ian Malcom not as crazy and interesting, they downplayed his eccentric scientist and made him into 'protector dad'.

I love the baby T-rex stuff. That is all from the novel, which I just read. Shame some of the stuff in the book didn't make it. At least the baby rex and trailer stuff was left pretty much intact.

Yeah the novel is amazing, I recommend it.
I heard that Spielberg wants to incorporate some of the scenes in the novel that didnt make it into the movie, like the part where raptors are chasing down men riding motor cycles.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 27, 2008, 01:53:20 PM
Quote from: Hybrid PM on Mar 27, 2008, 04:56:07 AM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Mar 26, 2008, 01:55:06 AM
Quote from: Weasel on Mar 26, 2008, 12:06:34 AM

The story was good, but it doesn't compete to something like JP1. I didn't really like the whole baby t-rex thing, it was stupid. And pretty much from the gymnastic thing on, the movie sucks. All with them going to San Diego and all that garbage. Plus they made Ian Malcom not as crazy and interesting, they downplayed his eccentric scientist and made him into 'protector dad'.

I love the baby T-rex stuff. That is all from the novel, which I just read. Shame some of the stuff in the book didn't make it. At least the baby rex and trailer stuff was left pretty much intact.

Yeah the novel is amazing, I recommend it.
I heard that Spielberg wants to incorporate some of the scenes in the novel that didnt make it into the movie, like the part where raptors are chasing down men riding motor cycles.

The novel was so much better than the movie. Though in practice, that chase scene will seem even more ridiculous than the T.Rex running down the jeep I think.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Iron Hide on Mar 27, 2008, 03:47:53 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 27, 2008, 01:53:20 PM
Quote from: Hybrid PM on Mar 27, 2008, 04:56:07 AM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Mar 26, 2008, 01:55:06 AM
Quote from: Weasel on Mar 26, 2008, 12:06:34 AM

The story was good, but it doesn't compete to something like JP1. I didn't really like the whole baby t-rex thing, it was stupid. And pretty much from the gymnastic thing on, the movie sucks. All with them going to San Diego and all that garbage. Plus they made Ian Malcom not as crazy and interesting, they downplayed his eccentric scientist and made him into 'protector dad'.

I love the baby T-rex stuff. That is all from the novel, which I just read. Shame some of the stuff in the book didn't make it. At least the baby rex and trailer stuff was left pretty much intact.

Yeah the novel is amazing, I recommend it.
I heard that Spielberg wants to incorporate some of the scenes in the novel that didnt make it into the movie, like the part where raptors are chasing down men riding motor cycles.

The novel was so much better than the movie. Though in practice, that chase scene will seem even more ridiculous than the T.Rex running down the jeep I think.

Hmm, I think it could be done right, we've never really seen the raptors running at full speed (we did in JP3, but that was just a quick sec) and I for sure wouldn't mind seeing them run down motorcycles. I'd also like to see either the Carnotaurus stand-off or the scene where Dodgson is fed to the nest of infant T-rexs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Der_Meister on Mar 27, 2008, 04:38:20 PM
ow man, reading all these posts makes me wanna JP 1,2 and 3 again  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Huol on Mar 27, 2008, 04:41:51 PM
I'd love to see the river scene from the novel incorperated into the fourth movie somehow.
Also the scene when Alan discovers the young Raptor.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Iron Hide on Mar 27, 2008, 04:52:17 PM
Quote from: Huol on Mar 27, 2008, 04:41:51 PM
I'd love to see the river scene from the novel incorperated into the fourth movie somehow.
Also the scene when Alan discovers the young Raptor.

Yeah, I always liked that part, another badass scene I'd want to see is from the first novel when Alan and the two kids came across the sleeping T-rex and woke it up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Mar 27, 2008, 05:32:59 PM
Speaking of TLW novel, why did Spielberg and Koepp replace Dodgson with Ludlow, leave out Levine, and change practically everything about it? The film version of JP was basically the same, same plot, same characters, but sized down. Where as TLW is practically a different movie with most of the characters created out of nowhere. Why couldn't they stay more faithful to the novel? I still like TLW, but some of the changes they made were not good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Iron Hide on Mar 27, 2008, 05:41:42 PM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Mar 27, 2008, 05:32:59 PM
Speaking of TLW novel, why did Spielberg and Koepp replace Dodgson with Ludlow, leave out Levine, and change practically everything about it? The film version of JP was basically the same, same plot, same characters, but sized down. Where as TLW is practically a different movie with most of the characters created out of nowhere. Why couldn't they stay more faithful to the novel? I still like TLW, but some of the changes they made were not good.


(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.brandsoftheworld.com%2Fbrands%2F0010%2F1961%2Fbrand.gif&hash=ba268a2f472c1e1c8a1ef0c7fa979ca15f73f1bd)

Mabye a liitle too much reefer?


I'm fine with TLW because I saw it before I read the novel...I was already used to it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Mar 27, 2008, 05:52:44 PM
Quote from: Iron Hide on Mar 27, 2008, 05:41:42 PM
I'm fine with TLW because I saw it before I read the novel...I was already used to it.

Same here, but I can imagine how those that read the novel first felt.

I do like Roland's character though. He was a good addition. And I can understand uping the body count. In the novel, Dodgson was only with 2 other people. Ludlow brings 20-30 people, so that increased the death count, which is always a good thing. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ccoletta86 on Mar 27, 2008, 06:33:52 PM
god damn stoners.....


proof that Marijuana kills brain cells ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 27, 2008, 06:36:50 PM
I used to think Lost world JP was both a remake of the 1920's movie and a sequel to Jurassic Park. This was back in 1997 when i was 6 lol.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Mar 27, 2008, 06:47:29 PM
It practically was a remake of the old movie, especially with the taking the T-rex back to America storyline Spielberg added because he always wanted to make a monster on the loose movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Mar 27, 2008, 06:57:23 PM
He done a good job.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 27, 2008, 07:09:09 PM
He did a great job as well. I would like to see it again as well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Huol on Mar 27, 2008, 07:19:40 PM
Quote from: Ccoletta86 on Mar 27, 2008, 06:33:52 PM
god damn stoners.....


proof that Marijuana kills brain cells ;)

You must of smoked a shit load then.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 27, 2008, 07:20:38 PM
I would like to see the theme park setting again as well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hybrid PM on Mar 27, 2008, 07:28:44 PM
The 4th movie is suppost to take place somewhere other that both islands. The mainland perhaps. Also I wonder if they will incorporate the Pteronadons flying off the island from the last movie in number 4.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 27, 2008, 07:30:11 PM
I hope they put in New York City because we already had a Jurassic Park movie in New York City before  ;).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 27, 2008, 07:32:31 PM
We did?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 27, 2008, 07:34:34 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 27, 2008, 07:32:31 PM
We did?

;)  :P

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120685/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 27, 2008, 07:39:52 PM
Haha, I had a feeling that's what you we're referring to.

I want more herbivore action in JP 4. They're always on the sidelines.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 27, 2008, 07:40:37 PM
I want to see the T-rex to be more darker.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: UltimateHunter on Mar 27, 2008, 08:00:18 PM
why plant eaters?? its alot more fun when you have to run from a man eating dino . running from a plant eater doesnt seem like a good dino movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 27, 2008, 08:02:45 PM
Quote from: UltimateHunter on Mar 27, 2008, 08:00:18 PM
why plant eaters?? its alot more fun when you have to run from a man eating dino . running from a plant eater doesnt seem like a good dino movie.

Plant-eaters burst into panic, and defend themselves...humans are caught in the middle and use the herbivores to defend themselves indirectly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Master Chief on Mar 27, 2008, 08:10:10 PM
Quote from: UltimateHunter on Mar 27, 2008, 08:00:18 PM
why plant eaters??

Imagine, if you will, a Triceratops charging at you at full speed...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: UltimateHunter on Mar 27, 2008, 08:18:21 PM
yea.. still dont feel it . meat eaters are what make the the movies anyway. raptors
t rex . ,.. compys .
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 27, 2008, 08:19:08 PM
Then it just becomes repetitive.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Zero on Mar 27, 2008, 08:44:46 PM
Compagnathus is actually an Insectaibore..
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Mar 27, 2008, 08:48:10 PM
True, but they also killed larger mammals in packs = TLW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Iron Hide on Mar 27, 2008, 09:05:50 PM
Quote from: Ratchetcomand on Mar 27, 2008, 07:40:37 PM
I want to see the T-rex to be more darker.

Hell Yeah, more like how it was in the first novel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Mar 27, 2008, 09:15:49 PM
For the plant eaters...

One word...

Triceratops...

All we've seen it do in these movies is lay down and charge a jeep, that's it. We need more Trike action.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 27, 2008, 09:23:26 PM
And a whole herd of Stegosaurs get pissed b/c their baby was disturbed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bug Hunt on Mar 27, 2008, 10:08:41 PM
I hope this film is done properly, unlike Jp3. Why is it that the third film in all francises has to suck?

Terminator 3: Sucked!
Alien 3: Sucked!
Jurassic Park 3: Sucked!
Jaws 3: Sucked!
Rambo 3: Sucked!
Spider-Man 3: Sucked!
X-Men 3: Sucked!
Back To The Future 3: Sucked
Matrix 3: Sucked!


Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Its Game Time on Mar 27, 2008, 10:12:25 PM
Quote from: To The Death on Mar 27, 2008, 10:08:41 PM
I hope this film is done properly, unlike Jp3. Why is it that the third film in all francises has to suck?

Terminator 3: Allright!
Alien 3: Awesome!
Jurassic Park 3: Awesome!
Jaws 3: Sucked!
Rambo 3: Sucked!
Spider-Man 3: Pretty good!
X-Men 3: Sucked!
Back To The Future 3: The best one!
Matrix 3: Sucked!




There ya go, fixed!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 27, 2008, 10:13:09 PM
Quote from: To The Death on Mar 27, 2008, 10:08:41 PM
I hope this film is done properly, unlike Jp3. Why is it that the third film in all francises has to suck?

Terminator 3: Sucked!
Alien 3: Sucked!
Jurassic Park 3: Sucked!
Jaws 3: Sucked!
Rambo 3: Sucked!
Spider-Man 3: Sucked!
X-Men 3: Sucked!
Back To The Future 3: Sucked
Matrix 3: Sucked!


What about Blade 3 and Superman 3, those sucked. And besides Terminator 3 and Spider-man 3 where pretty good (T3 has a 77% on RT and Spider-man 3 has a 62% on RT).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Iron Hide on Mar 27, 2008, 10:19:32 PM
Quote from: Its Game Time on Mar 27, 2008, 10:12:25 PM
Quote from: To The Death on Mar 27, 2008, 10:08:41 PM
I hope this film is done properly, unlike Jp3. Why is it that the third film in all francises has to suck?

Terminator 3: Allright!
Alien 3: Uber Awesome!
Jurassic Park 3: Awesome!
Jaws 3: Sucked!
Rambo 3: Sucked!
Spider-Man 3: Pretty good!
X-Men 3: Sucked!
Back To The Future 3: The best one!
Matrix 3: Sucked!




There ya go, fixed!

Now there you go  ;D.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dachande on Mar 27, 2008, 10:19:57 PM
Quote from: Its Game Time on Mar 27, 2008, 10:12:25 PM
Quote from: To The Death on Mar 27, 2008, 10:08:41 PM
I hope this film is done properly, unlike Jp3. Why is it that the third film in all francises has to suck?

Terminator 3: Allright!
Alien 3: Awesome!
Jurassic Park 3: Alright!
Jaws 3: Sucked!
Rambo 3: Sucked!
Spider-Man 3: Pretty good!
X-Men 3: Sucked!
Back To The Future 3: The best one!
Matrix 3: Sucked!




There ya go, fixed!

Doubly Fixed!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Mar 27, 2008, 10:20:30 PM
One dinosaur I'd like to see is an Iguanadon. Had a huge spike on each thumb, perfect Raptor fighting weapons.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 27, 2008, 10:27:00 PM
Back To The Future 3 was good as well (It has a 78% on RT).

Back on topic, there a chance it may be bad because 4 is a very number for movies such as

SuperMan 4: Bad
Batman & Robin: Very Bad
Alien: Resurrection: Bad
Police Academy 4: Citizens on Patrol: It was ok but still bad
Jaws 4: Very Bad
A Nightmare on Elm Street 4: Bad but still Allright
Rocky 4: Sucked!
Saw IV: Bad
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Its Game Time on Mar 27, 2008, 10:40:52 PM
Quote from: Ratchetcomand on Mar 27, 2008, 10:27:00 PM
Back To The Future 3 was good as well (It has a 78% on RT).

Back on topic, there a chance it may be bad because 4 is a very number for movies such as

SuperMan 4: Bad
Batman & Robin: Very Bad
Alien: Resurrection: Bad
Police Academy 4: Citizens on Patrol: It was ok but still bad
Jaws 4: Very Bad
A Nightmare on Elm Street 4: Bad but still Allright
Rocky 4: Sucked!
Saw IV: Bad

I definetly agree about Alien ressurection.

I actually thought superman 4 was pretty good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 27, 2008, 10:45:21 PM
Superman 4 was bad because the bad guy was lame and the story was borning. I haven't seen it since 1998 though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hybrid PM on Mar 27, 2008, 11:52:57 PM
Indiana Jones 4 will break the curse!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on Mar 28, 2008, 12:14:54 AM
Maybe. Hopefully. PLEASE GOD PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Mar 28, 2008, 12:17:49 AM
The reason forth movies suck is because the company usually loses faith in the series and hires the wrong people. With Speilberg helming Indie 4, it can't fail. Simple as that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Zero on Mar 28, 2008, 12:26:35 AM
Spielburg and Lucas are devoted to those movies damnitt!I fonly Michael Bay or Spielburg directs or Producse IV I'll be damn happy
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on Mar 28, 2008, 12:28:09 AM
Same here.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alienseseses on Mar 28, 2008, 12:29:17 AM
Michael Bay is arrogant.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: severen76 on Mar 28, 2008, 12:29:32 AM
Micheal bay better stay the hell away from Jurassic Park. I don't want it turning into another one of his disasterpieces.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Zero on Mar 28, 2008, 12:30:17 AM
Michael Bay did Good with Transformers and the New  Nightmare on Elm sounds good
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on Mar 28, 2008, 12:31:01 AM
What new Nightmare on Elm Street?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Zero on Mar 28, 2008, 12:32:10 AM
Quote from: ghost rider on Mar 28, 2008, 12:31:01 AM
What new Nightmare on Elm Street?

New Remake in production by Michael Bay
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: severen76 on Mar 28, 2008, 12:33:07 AM
Transformers was a 2 hour excuse for explosions. The nightmare on elm street remake, well if it isn't broke don't fix it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on Mar 28, 2008, 12:36:53 AM
Transformers was the best movie of 2007 to me. Next to Spider-Man 3.(even though they ruined venom.)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: severen76 on Mar 28, 2008, 12:39:28 AM
I thought Spiderman 3 was one of the worst films last year. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Zero on Mar 28, 2008, 12:40:03 AM
The new Venom was not ruined.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: severen76 on Mar 28, 2008, 12:42:18 AM
Yes he was.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on Mar 28, 2008, 12:43:21 AM
Why venom was ruined.

1. Not muscular enough.

2. Teeth too small.

3. Silver spider emblem.

4. No long snakey tongue.

5. The voice wasn't deep enough.

6. He was too short.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Zero on Mar 28, 2008, 12:44:50 AM
Quote from: ghost rider on Mar 28, 2008, 12:43:21 AM
Why venom was ruined.

1. Not muscular enough.

2. Teeth too small.

3. Silver spider emblem.

4. No long snakey tongue.

5. The voice wasn't deep enough.

6. He was too short.

Welcome to the real world  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on Mar 28, 2008, 12:46:10 AM
Unfortunatly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: severen76 on Mar 28, 2008, 12:51:13 AM
The real world? It's based on a comic about a guy getting bitten by a radioactive spider. How real can it get.  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on Mar 28, 2008, 12:52:46 AM
A guy being bit by a geneticlly engineered spider. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 28, 2008, 01:14:03 AM
Quote from: severen76 on Mar 28, 2008, 12:39:28 AM
I thought Spiderman 3 was one of the worst films last year. :)

Wow really? What about The Hitcher and Epic Movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: severen76 on Mar 28, 2008, 01:16:07 AM
Quote from: Ratchetcomand on Mar 28, 2008, 01:14:03 AM
Quote from: severen76 on Mar 28, 2008, 12:39:28 AM
I thought Spiderman 3 was one of the worst films last year. :)

Wow really? What about The Hitcher and Epic Movie.

Don't get me started. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on Mar 28, 2008, 01:16:19 AM
Other than a ruined Venom, how can anyone hate Spider-Man?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 28, 2008, 01:22:52 AM
Quote from: War Wager on Mar 28, 2008, 12:17:49 AM
The reason forth movies suck is because the company usually loses faith in the series and hires the wrong people. With Speilberg helming Indie 4, it can't fail. Simple as that.

Indie 4 is going to rock. The only forth movies i think where good was Rambo (John Rambo).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Venom on Mar 28, 2008, 01:23:41 AM
Quote from: ghost rider on Mar 28, 2008, 12:43:21 AM
Why venom was ruined.

1. Not muscular enough.

2. Teeth too small.

3. Silver spider emblem.

4. No long snakey tongue.

5. The voice wasn't deep enough.

6. He was too short.
Doesn't my Sig look Bad Ass? :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 28, 2008, 01:53:04 AM
Quote from: ghost rider on Mar 28, 2008, 12:43:21 AM
Why venom was ruined.

1. Not muscular enough.

2. Teeth too small.

3. Silver spider emblem.

4. No long snakey tongue.

5. The voice wasn't deep enough.

6. He was too short.

I'd change #5 to "Voice wasn't altered". Remember the cartoon from the 90s? PLUS, here's a seventh point: 7. Didn't refer to himself in the 3rd person
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 28, 2008, 02:00:57 AM
I didn't worry about Venom because i knew he was going to have a small role any ways.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alienseseses on Mar 28, 2008, 02:55:58 AM
Quote from: Zero on Mar 28, 2008, 12:30:17 AM
Michael Bay did Good with Transformers and the New  Nightmare on Elm sounds good
I enjoyed Transformers when it first came out, but when I saw it again I realized that he is more intent on setting up explosions than he is at setting up shots. The way his action scenes play out, it feels like he had a camera and aimed it at the action and shook it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 28, 2008, 02:56:50 AM
The one thing i didn't like about Transformers it had too much humor.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Iron Hide on Mar 28, 2008, 02:59:25 AM
Quote from: Ratchetcomand on Mar 28, 2008, 02:56:50 AM
The one thing i didn't like about Transformers it had too much humor.

Tiz true, the only problem I had with the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 28, 2008, 03:00:23 AM
Can we go back on topic please.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: severen76 on Mar 28, 2008, 03:09:49 AM
Last article I read said a script/Idea had been written years ago and the writer never heard anything. JPIV is a long way off. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dark Passenger on Mar 28, 2008, 10:26:22 AM
Quote from: Ratchetcomand on Mar 28, 2008, 02:56:50 AM
The one thing i didn't like about Transformers it had too much humor.

I didnt mind it, i just didnt like the lack of focus it had on bumblebee and sam, and the Autobots...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Mar 28, 2008, 12:56:54 PM
Quote from: severen76 on Mar 28, 2008, 03:09:49 AM
Last article I read said a script/Idea had been written years ago and the writer never heard anything. JPIV is a long way off. :)

It'll be announced this year at some point I know it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Zero on Mar 28, 2008, 07:38:23 PM
Several scripts have been written
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 28, 2008, 09:26:08 PM
Most infamously the dino-soldiers one
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hybrid PM on Mar 28, 2008, 09:33:05 PM
Laura Dern was asked to come back by Spielberg as well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The One and Only on Apr 10, 2008, 04:51:21 AM
I'm actually quite fond of the "dino-soldiers" idea that came up a few years ago. And from what I read , so was Hasbro, the makers of the Jurassic Park toyline. I had read a script review in Ain't It Cool News.com of John Sayles JP4 script, and surpisingly i thought it was interesting. Even the bitter morbid, canker sores who reviewed the puppy lliked it. Seeing that Sayle wrote my favorite killer gator flick, Alligator, and one of, if not the best werewolf flicks of all time, The Howling. Which took the idear of doing a flick about werewolves in group therapy, and making it a classic to this day, I'd be willing to give the armed and dangerous dinos a chance. Hell, when you think about it, the idea isn't that far fetched. During the second World War. The military, in a program called "Project X-Ray". Developed a method to use bats to deploy pellets of napalm on the battlefield. Also, I just saw this one on the History Channel a week ago. Apparently in the 1920's, the Russians, were trying to create a race of half-human, half-ape ??? supersoldiers. I kid you not. Although I doubt we'll see that flick, but I wouldn't mind seeing a JP flick based on this http://www.jplegacy.org/home.php?load=toys/jpcethist.shtml (http://www.jplegacy.org/home.php?load=toys/jpcethist.shtml) .
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Aeus on Apr 17, 2008, 10:59:28 PM
Somewhat JP related... (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8X6jRI57Ek)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alienseseses on Apr 17, 2008, 11:01:38 PM
Saw it coming.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Aeus on Apr 17, 2008, 11:03:40 PM
Badass none the less.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alienseseses on Apr 17, 2008, 11:08:06 PM
True.
Someone should put in Godzilla's roar.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Aeus on Apr 17, 2008, 11:12:06 PM
T-Rex, Predator and Godzilla are the kings of roaring.

I wish my cat roared like them.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ron Perlman fan on Apr 17, 2008, 11:14:50 PM
i grew up on Jurassic Park it was hard to decide but i choose the raptors that would be amazing if they made a JP4
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 18, 2008, 12:24:38 AM
Quote from: Aeus on Apr 17, 2008, 10:59:28 PM
Somewhat JP related... (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8X6jRI57Ek)

Bwahahahaha, made my day xD
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The One and Only on Apr 18, 2008, 05:05:24 AM
I guess that what he would've sounded like if Dutch had sampled Ventura's tabacco ? ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 18, 2008, 02:00:37 PM
Quote from: The One and Only on Apr 18, 2008, 05:05:24 AM
I guess that what he would've sounded like if Dutch had sampled Ventura's tabacco ? ;D

HAHAHAHAHA  :D :D you got it!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DARIAS93 on Apr 18, 2008, 09:07:43 PM
T-Rex I prefer him/her than Spinosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The One and Only on May 19, 2008, 01:12:58 AM
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/18166 (http://www.aintitcool.com/node/18166) A script review to Jurassic Park IV, written by John Sayles.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 19, 2008, 01:16:57 AM
Dude, that's from 2004...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The One and Only on May 19, 2008, 01:44:49 AM
I know, but I thought it was interesting. ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on May 19, 2008, 01:17:00 PM
http://www.shocktillyoudrop.com/news/topnews.php?id=6144
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 19, 2008, 03:34:50 PM
Now that is good news. Can't wait for this one 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ShadowPred on May 19, 2008, 06:21:37 PM
At least we have that!
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on May 19, 2008, 06:43:36 PM
I'm glad they have Dern as the lead, now look whats happened:

JP - Neil, Dern and Goldblom
JP2 - Goldblom
JP3 - Neil
JP4 - Dern

The original cast now have their own movies.  8)
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 19, 2008, 09:00:54 PM
You mispelled Goldblum ;) But ya, you're right! I hope he returns for this film, he always adds a bit of humour.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DARIAS93 on May 19, 2008, 09:06:07 PM
Finally Steven Spierberg is directing the next JP movie can't wait for this movie.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 19, 2008, 09:06:54 PM
Really?!?
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DARIAS93 on May 19, 2008, 09:10:37 PM
That what Dern said in the interview.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on May 19, 2008, 09:18:15 PM
I think we are going to see more info this year because Indy 4 is coming out this year.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DARIAS93 on May 19, 2008, 09:38:11 PM
Maybe but I think we're going to see more info when the Mummy 3 comes out.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Da-Wolf on May 19, 2008, 09:44:52 PM
the sensation JP gives me is awesome, the musci, the dinosaurs, I can't wait for the next one.

PS: hey, could anyone tell me how to make polls on your toics?
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DARIAS93 on May 19, 2008, 09:47:05 PM
Yeah me too

PS: Is at the right side where it says new topic.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Da-Wolf on May 19, 2008, 09:48:53 PM
Quote from: AVPVT Extinction on May 19, 2008, 09:47:05 PM
Yeah me too

PS: Is at the right side where it says new topic.
Holy!*slaps himself in the face*.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on May 19, 2008, 09:50:31 PM
Stan Winston said he will do the effects for the 4th movie.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DARIAS93 on May 19, 2008, 09:52:22 PM
Quote from: Da-Wolf on May 19, 2008, 09:48:53 PM
Quote from: AVPVT Extinction on May 19, 2008, 09:47:05 PM
Yeah me too

PS: Is at the right side where it says new topic.
Holy!*slaps himself in the face*.
Everybody makes mistakes dude you don't need to slap your face ;)

Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Zero on May 19, 2008, 09:57:57 PM
It's impossible...they are finally going to make it....Oh god,help me somebody before I paste dinosaurs all over my sig
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: severen76 on May 19, 2008, 10:00:13 PM
Help you? OK.

well JP3 was crap so I wouldn't get my hopes up if I were you.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Zero on May 19, 2008, 10:01:16 PM
STEVEN SPIELBERG IS DIRECTING IT!!!
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DARIAS93 on May 19, 2008, 10:06:56 PM
Quote from: Ratchetcomand on May 19, 2008, 09:50:31 PM
Stan Winston said he will do the effects for the 4th movie.
Really? that's great ;D
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: severen76 on May 19, 2008, 10:07:52 PM
Quote from: Zero on May 19, 2008, 10:01:16 PM
STEVEN SPIELBERG IS DIRECTING IT!!!

Well he directed War Of The Worlds too. :)
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DARIAS93 on May 19, 2008, 10:09:24 PM
Quote from: severen76 on May 19, 2008, 10:07:52 PM
Quote from: Zero on May 19, 2008, 10:01:16 PM
STEVEN SPIELBERG IS DIRECTING IT!!!

Well he directed War Of The Worlds too. :)
But he directed Indy 4. ;)
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: severen76 on May 19, 2008, 10:09:56 PM
Quote from: AVPVT Extinction on May 19, 2008, 10:09:24 PM
Quote from: severen76 on May 19, 2008, 10:07:52 PM
Quote from: Zero on May 19, 2008, 10:01:16 PM
STEVEN SPIELBERG IS DIRECTING IT!!!

Well he directed War Of The Worlds too. :)
But he directed Indy 4. ;)

But I haven't seen that.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DARIAS93 on May 19, 2008, 10:12:13 PM
But you know is having a lot of good reviews on it, right? :)
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: severen76 on May 19, 2008, 10:14:29 PM
Well I heard they were OK reviews and some were bad too. Or so I hear.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DARIAS93 on May 19, 2008, 10:15:18 PM
I thought it was having good reviews ???
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on May 19, 2008, 10:25:33 PM
I can't even post a single post in this topic because too many people are posting at the same time.

I was about say the samething that AVPVT said before he post.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DARIAS93 on May 19, 2008, 10:27:10 PM
Maybe you need to type faster or something like I'm doing now ;)
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Da-Wolf on May 19, 2008, 10:27:31 PM
it doesn't matters, I can read minds.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DARIAS93 on May 19, 2008, 10:35:32 PM
Oh yeah read mines. ;D
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 19, 2008, 11:41:04 PM
Quote from: severen76 on May 19, 2008, 10:00:13 PM
Help you? OK.

well JP3 was crap so I wouldn't get my hopes up if I were you.

It was hardly crap, but it wasn't that great.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Vemados on May 19, 2008, 11:51:52 PM
First one is still the best..
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: wolfboy22 on May 20, 2008, 12:04:35 AM
Looking forward to the third movie, I enjoyed the first 3 and hopefully this one will be even better.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: NintendoMan on May 20, 2008, 12:11:00 AM
err are u sure Steven is directing it??
because i remember he wants to do that Lincoln biopic after Indy....or Tintin
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on May 20, 2008, 12:22:10 AM
It looks 2009 will be a good year for movies.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DARIAS93 on May 20, 2008, 01:10:18 AM
Quote from: predatorlover on May 20, 2008, 12:11:00 AM
err are u sure Steven is directing it??
because i remember he wants to do that Lincoln biopic after Indy....or Tintin
Yep. :)
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 20, 2008, 04:20:36 AM
Quote from: Ratchetcomand on May 20, 2008, 12:22:10 AM
It looks 2009 will be a good year for movies.

I'll second that ;D
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on May 20, 2008, 09:05:49 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 20, 2008, 04:20:36 AM
Quote from: Ratchetcomand on May 20, 2008, 12:22:10 AM
It looks 2009 will be a good year for movies.

I'll second that ;D

I agree. ;)
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DARIAS93 on May 20, 2008, 09:15:18 PM
Hopefully is longer than JP3 and more new dinosaurs as well.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on May 20, 2008, 09:18:26 PM
It should go back to what the original was like.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DARIAS93 on May 20, 2008, 09:20:10 PM
Yeah me too.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Zero on May 20, 2008, 09:44:30 PM
I don't want a rehap of Lost World.I wanted them to go forth with the one where the Dinos become infected with the virus that wiped them out,they start washing up on Costa rica.The humans find out the horrible truth-it's transferrable to humans
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: B-Rad G on May 20, 2008, 09:46:43 PM
None of JP movies have been great if you ask me. The first movie was ok and the book was better. The second movie was like a Godzilla movie and it was unreal as well. Jurassic Park III was crap!
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DARIAS93 on May 20, 2008, 09:48:24 PM
Quote from: Zero on May 20, 2008, 09:44:30 PM
I don't want a rehap of Lost World.I wanted them to go forth with the one where the Dinos become infected with the virus that wiped them out,they start washing up on Costa rica.The humans find out the horrible truth-it's transferrable to humans
That idea is kidding no offense bad I prefer the dinosaurs live on earth like the humans.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Zero on May 20, 2008, 09:51:17 PM
^^WOULD YOU RATHER HAVE DINO-RIDERS ALL OVER AGAIN???
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DARIAS93 on May 20, 2008, 09:52:05 PM
Quote from: Zero on May 20, 2008, 09:51:17 PM
^^WOULD YOU RATHER HAVE DINO-RIDERS ALL OVER AGAIN???
I don't know what you mean by Dino-Riders dude.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Zero on May 20, 2008, 09:52:52 PM
There was an old script almost accepted where Dinosaurs carried guns...
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DARIAS93 on May 20, 2008, 09:58:03 PM
Quote from: Zero on May 20, 2008, 09:52:52 PM
There was an old script almost accepted where Dinosaurs carried guns...
Oh yeah I remember now, well no.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Da-Wolf on May 21, 2008, 12:18:22 AM
Holy*
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 21, 2008, 12:54:03 AM
It wasn't quite dinosaurs with guns, but rather human mercenaries mixed with raptor DNA.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DiabloGuapo on May 21, 2008, 02:42:04 AM
....just give me back my Tyrannosaurus.... :'(
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The One and Only on May 21, 2008, 03:37:48 AM
A Spitter or two wouldn't hurt either.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: wolfboy22 on May 21, 2008, 02:53:39 PM
I want to see the dinos set loose in the city like in the second one.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 21, 2008, 03:16:58 PM
Quote from: The One and Only on May 21, 2008, 03:37:48 AM
A Spitter or two wouldn't hurt either.

For sure, but this time, let's get fully grown real-sized adults and not the small ones from the first film.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: UltimateHunter on May 21, 2008, 08:01:44 PM
just bring back the rex he was the koolest dino there so why get rid of him.. totally bring t rex back
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DARIAS93 on May 21, 2008, 08:02:49 PM
Quote from: UltimateHunter on May 21, 2008, 08:01:44 PM
just bring back the rex he was the koolest dino there so why get rid of him.. totally bring t rex back
I agree.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: UltimateHunter on May 21, 2008, 08:09:30 PM
thank you..  8)
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Flaming Firefox on May 21, 2008, 08:29:25 PM
I liked the first two. JP was a monumental film for me when I first saw it. JP3 wasn't so bad either. At least Dr. Grant was back.

I don't know I think they should leave this series be. I have a hard time thinking of where they would go with the story.

As good as the movies were the books were like 100x better.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DARIAS93 on May 21, 2008, 08:31:29 PM
Was there any other books beside Jurassic Park and the Lost World because I don't know?
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Da-Wolf on May 21, 2008, 08:44:06 PM
if you go to your local librarie you will find tons of books beside the JP ones.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DARIAS93 on May 21, 2008, 08:49:21 PM
Quote from: Da-Wolf on May 21, 2008, 08:44:06 PM
if you go to your local librarie you will find tons of books beside the JP ones.
No I mean was there more books that continues after the Lost World of Jurassic Park?
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 21, 2008, 09:19:49 PM
Nope, TLW was the last one.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DARIAS93 on May 21, 2008, 10:53:29 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 21, 2008, 09:19:49 PM
Nope, TLW was the last one.
Really? well anyways thanks for telling me.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Flaming Firefox on May 22, 2008, 11:50:55 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 21, 2008, 09:19:49 PM
Nope, TLW was the last one.

Which is a shame, because TLW was an awesome book. Thinking about it I haven't read any Crichton books for ages.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 22, 2008, 03:23:26 PM
Absolutely it was. Best sequence: the raptor stopping to sniff the wrapper, looking up, and going (well, almost) "Wasup?" ;D 8)
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jun 28, 2008, 04:53:16 PM
The writers from Wanted have been sign to do a "Jurassic Park" Type Movie. Chould this be a Jurassic Park IV?

Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 28, 2008, 05:03:55 PM
Possibly. Any info on this?
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jun 28, 2008, 05:06:53 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 28, 2008, 05:03:55 PM
Possibly. Any info on this?

http://www.worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=9172&count=0

Edit: Never mind, i found out that the movie is not a JP movie.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on Jun 28, 2008, 05:25:08 PM
Man oh well.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Jun 28, 2008, 05:44:24 PM
Reading always helps.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 28, 2008, 09:36:14 PM
Another dinosaur film would be welcome though all the same.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jun 28, 2008, 09:41:30 PM
Too bad it not JP4 because Jurassic Park 4 needs to get out of Devoplment Hell soon as Possible because JP4 was supose to comeout like 3 or 4 years ago.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 28, 2008, 10:27:47 PM
I think it's confirmed for 2009 now.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Jun 28, 2008, 11:08:31 PM
JP4 has broke the release date chain.

JP (1993)

4 Years

JP2 (1997)

4 years

JP3 (2001)

4 years

JP4 (2005)  :'( We should have only 1 year 'til JP5.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Simbobs12345 on Jun 29, 2008, 06:07:02 PM
Jurassic Park will never be the same without Stan Winston :'(
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 30, 2008, 06:24:11 PM
Quote from: Simbobs12345 on Jun 29, 2008, 06:07:02 PM
Jurassic Park will never be the same without Stan Winston :'(

W/o SW, I could go for Framestore handling the dinosaurs.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Warrior Angel on Jun 30, 2008, 08:55:53 PM
when will this ever come out?!?! im so excited since i heard about this like 4 years ago!!! come on already
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 01, 2008, 01:58:43 AM
2009; I don't think there's an official date yet though.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: NintendoMan on Jul 01, 2008, 10:54:29 AM
Trust me, it wont come out next year.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dark Passenger on Jul 01, 2008, 11:12:50 AM
question is, will the dinosaurs be even close to what they were in the first 3 without stan winston..
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 01, 2008, 01:52:53 PM
Hm, I can think so. Framestore CFC could pull it off; they created the dinosaurs for the Walking With Dinosaurs series.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dark Passenger on Jul 01, 2008, 02:34:23 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 01, 2008, 01:52:53 PM
Hm, I can think so. Framestore CFC could pull it off; they created the dinosaurs for the Walking With Dinosaurs series.

they were good, second to jurrasic park effects..but i dont think anyone could replace stan winston..
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: B-Rad G on Dec 08, 2008, 02:44:05 PM
Say good bye to this movie:

http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=51101
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Cellien on Dec 08, 2008, 03:37:11 PM
Game over man, game over.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 08, 2008, 03:53:21 PM
Quote from: B-Rad G on Dec 08, 2008, 02:44:05 PM
Say good bye to this movie:

http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=51101

Aw, WTF this sux major balls.
Title: Re: (New Poll) Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Dec 08, 2008, 04:34:44 PM
I second that. ^

Please Universal, bring back Spielberg and do JPIV for Crichton!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled?*
Post by: severen76 on Dec 08, 2008, 04:37:07 PM
Oh well.

It's not like they had a decent story to continue the sereis with anyway.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled?*
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 08, 2008, 06:22:23 PM
If you're referring to the dino-soldiers idea, I'm pretty sure that was being scrapped.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled?*
Post by: Undeadite on Dec 08, 2008, 06:40:32 PM
There were more stories than just the dino soldiers idea, and all of them sucked balls. I would rather let the series rest in peace than watch it get desecrated by shitty storytelling.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled?*
Post by: B-Rad G on Dec 08, 2008, 07:03:23 PM
With Stan and Crichton gone then their is no point.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled?*
Post by: War Wager on Dec 08, 2008, 07:22:36 PM
The JP movies were my childhood movies, I loved them to bits. I really want the series to continue or at least make it a closed franchise with a finishing movie. Have Site B get nuked or something at the end.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled*
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 09, 2008, 02:10:50 AM
Crichton dying is a piss-weak excuse. They didn't need him.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled*
Post by: B-Rad G on Dec 09, 2008, 02:13:20 AM
After the 3rd movie, I rather have the series rest for now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled*
Post by: Eidotemit on Dec 09, 2008, 02:28:48 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 09, 2008, 02:10:50 AM
Crichton dying is a piss-weak excuse. They didn't need him.

Even still, the series peaked. I felt 3 was really lackluster, and don't think a fourth would fair much better (in fact I had quite expected it to be far worse). Its better to  have it end now; rather than have it carry on and get worse with each iteration. Let the name die when it have some value left.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled*
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 09, 2008, 03:01:57 AM
Eh. JP 3 wasn't stellar yes, but if Spielberg has returned to direct, it could've been good I think.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled*
Post by: Eidotemit on Dec 09, 2008, 03:50:09 AM
It probably could have. I still think its best to let it lie, rather than risk cheapening the brand.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled*
Post by: War Wager on Dec 09, 2008, 09:47:13 AM
JPIII was basically a popcorn movie aimed at kids. If JP4 were more mature and had a good plot to it, I'm sure it would go down well. Afterall, good movie series usually end in an even number.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled*
Post by: Undeadite on Dec 09, 2008, 03:47:41 PM
Quote from: War Wager on Dec 09, 2008, 09:47:13 AM
JPIII was basically a popcorn movie aimed at kids. If JP4 were more mature and had a good plot to it, I'm sure it would go down well. Afterall, good movie series usually end in an equal number.

Say what?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled*
Post by: War Wager on Dec 09, 2008, 04:23:02 PM
Okay, not every series, but the Alien, Predator, X-Men, Star Wars, Indy etc spring to mind.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled*
Post by: Alienseseses on Dec 09, 2008, 05:58:36 PM
Equal number?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled*
Post by: War Wager on Dec 09, 2008, 07:24:32 PM
Bugger, I mean even number.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled*
Post by: Undeadite on Dec 09, 2008, 08:54:21 PM
Quote from: War Wager on Dec 09, 2008, 04:23:02 PM
Okay, not every series, but the Alien, Predator, X-Men, Star Wars, Indy etc spring to mind.

X-Men has three movies, the fourth one coming out is a series of its own.

Im much more of a fan of trilogies, I think three films is more than enough to do the job.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled*
Post by: Alienseseses on Dec 09, 2008, 09:09:51 PM
Quote from: War Wager on Dec 09, 2008, 04:23:02 PM
Okay, not every series, but the Alien, Predator, X-Men, Star Wars, Indy etc spring to mind.
Alien Res wasn't a great series end.

Also...

Anaconda
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled*
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 09, 2008, 11:58:29 PM
Quote from: War Wager on Dec 09, 2008, 04:23:02 PM
Okay, not every series, but the Alien, Predator, X-Men, Star Wars, Indy etc spring to mind.

X-Men ended with X3, what even number?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled*
Post by: Predator-S on Dec 10, 2008, 12:43:19 AM
One part of me is happy for this. There wasn't even supposed to be a third movie, The Lost World was a perfect ending to the franchise.

On the other hand I'm a bit sad, because I'm really curious about how this may have gone down. Also, I wanted ro see more dinos.

Oh, well. That's that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled*
Post by: War Wager on Dec 10, 2008, 12:49:20 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 09, 2008, 11:58:29 PM
Quote from: War Wager on Dec 09, 2008, 04:23:02 PM
Okay, not every series, but the Alien, Predator, X-Men, Star Wars, Indy etc spring to mind.

X-Men ended with X3, what even number?

I was counting in Wolverine as the title has 'X-Men' at the start.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled*
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 10, 2008, 12:55:09 AM
Wolverine, along with Magneto, are spin-offs. They aren't tied to the other films other than the name of the titular character.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled*
Post by: War Wager on Dec 10, 2008, 01:04:52 AM
Ah well. You know what I mean anyway, I think.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled*
Post by: FreewayShark on Dec 10, 2008, 01:29:04 AM
While I was interested to see where they would have gone with the franchise, I understand why they don't want to push forward with it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled*
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 10, 2008, 03:46:45 AM
I wanted to see new dinosaurs...but seriously, I don't see a real reason for this film being canned.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled*
Post by: SiL on Dec 10, 2008, 09:13:09 AM
Maybe someone finally realised there was no damned reason for a sequel ... and actually decided not to do one, rather than crap out something sub-par and uninteresting.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled*
Post by: WisePredator on Dec 10, 2008, 09:14:55 AM
I personally thought JP/// was sub-par.


http://www.cinemablend.com/new.php?id=11181
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled*
Post by: SiL on Dec 10, 2008, 09:48:26 AM
As is the majority vote.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled*
Post by: B-Rad G on Dec 10, 2008, 12:18:32 PM
http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Jurassic-Park-4-Not-So-Dead-11181.html

Good news for fans.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled*
Post by: WisePredator on Dec 10, 2008, 02:02:11 PM
Ahem...
Quote from: WisePredator on Dec 10, 2008, 09:14:55 AMhttp://www.cinemablend.com/new.php?id=11181


Quote from: SiL on Dec 10, 2008, 09:48:26 AMAs is the majority vote.
I have my reasons.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled*
Post by: Alien³ on Dec 10, 2008, 06:37:34 PM
For f**ks sake.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled*
Post by: War Wager on Dec 10, 2008, 08:38:00 PM
Quote from: B-Rad G on Dec 10, 2008, 12:18:32 PM
http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Jurassic-Park-4-Not-So-Dead-11181.html

Good news for fans.

Thats good news.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: CanadianHero67 on Dec 10, 2008, 08:58:54 PM
Great news indeed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: WisePredator on Dec 10, 2008, 09:00:53 PM
Not all fans want a JPIV...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Dec 10, 2008, 10:33:35 PM
...though the poll above disagree's.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: severen76 on Dec 10, 2008, 11:44:42 PM
No it clearly doesn't.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Dec 10, 2008, 11:52:23 PM
Uh, with over 70% of voters looking forward to it or extremely looking forward to it - it clearly does.

Unless you have some bizarro interpretation of "clearly".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: WisePredator on Dec 11, 2008, 05:42:13 AM
Quote from: War Wager on Dec 10, 2008, 10:33:35 PM
...though the poll above disagree's.
I'm one of the minority of fans not looking forward to it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV *cancelled*
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 11, 2008, 06:53:44 AM
Quote from: B-Rad G on Dec 10, 2008, 12:18:32 PM
http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Jurassic-Park-4-Not-So-Dead-11181.html

Good news for fans.

Well at least that's something. Let's hope Universal takes it seriously.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Carnage95 on Dec 11, 2008, 07:15:44 AM
That's great news! Hopefully if the fourth film does do good they will make a new video game like Operation Genesis.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Jango1201 on Dec 12, 2008, 06:21:29 AM
I liked all 3 but I think this series needs to rest. I don't know how many times you can tell a story of people on an island running from dinosaurs. Not unless they decide to take the franchise into space and let them lose on a spaceship  ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dark Passenger on Dec 13, 2008, 12:53:41 PM
Quote from: severen76 on Dec 10, 2008, 11:44:42 PM
No it clearly doesn't.

uHHH DUHHH!

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Chibi Kiriyama on Dec 13, 2008, 07:20:31 PM
I wasn't a fan of The Lost World and Jurassic Park III was mediocre, but I was interested in seeing where a fourth film would have gone with the idea. Still, it's understandable why they're putting this on the back burner. Two of the main reasons to see a Jurassic Park film have passed away. Those are big shoes to fill.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 13, 2008, 11:42:12 PM
Michael Crichton may have written the two original books yes, but he isn't essential to the series continuation. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Dec 13, 2008, 11:44:56 PM
He certainly gave 'em better plots.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Chibi Kiriyama on Dec 14, 2008, 01:01:14 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 13, 2008, 11:42:12 PM
Michael Crichton may have written the two original books yes, but he isn't essential to the series continuation. 

Essential? No. But like Winston, his loss will be felt in some form or another until they find someone of the same caliber. Obviously, they don't feel that time is now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 14, 2008, 02:47:46 AM
Fair enough. I suppose the best script writer would be someone who has experience in sci-fi films. Didn't Crichton co-write the JP films with someone else?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 26, 2009, 08:19:34 PM
I CAN"T WAIT FOR THIS GODDAMN MOVIE!!!!!!!!!

they better give the rex a bigger part this time.

i hope they actually do make this movie, cause from recent news, it wasn't looking good. :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 26, 2009, 10:09:44 PM
Film's on hold right now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ShadowPred on Jan 26, 2009, 10:15:49 PM
Isn't it dead?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Johnny Handsome on Jan 26, 2009, 11:13:45 PM
Quote from: ShadowPred on Jan 26, 2009, 10:15:49 PM
Isn't it dead?
I don't think the franchise is dead until it doesn't do any good at the box office.

Its on hold for now but that doesn't mean its dead especially since Hollywood decided to reboil or remake famous and successfull franchises.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 27, 2009, 02:30:03 AM
I doubt it'll stay dead for the reason Johnny just mentioned, but also because it's Jurassic Park: a sequel to JP 3 can always fit one way or another.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 27, 2009, 08:38:08 PM
this movie must be made!
Spielberg should direct again. but don't screw it up with aliens like they did with Indy 4. but that was mostly cause of Lucas. Lucas ain't attached to the JP franchise. (thank god)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: gameoverman on Jan 27, 2009, 08:45:28 PM
I think they should do a reboot and this time stick much closer to Crichton's novel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 27, 2009, 08:56:54 PM
Quote from: gameoverman on Jan 27, 2009, 08:45:28 PM
I think they should do a reboot and this time stick much closer to Crichton's novel.

Crichton's novel might be too confusing for the general audience.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Jan 27, 2009, 10:50:09 PM
The first film was as close to the book as it needed to be.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Undeadite on Jan 27, 2009, 10:58:34 PM
Quote from: SM on Jan 27, 2009, 10:50:09 PM
The first film was as close to the book as it needed to be.

I agree, with everything that goes on in the book it would be impossible to fit it all into a movie and keep it entertaining.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 28, 2009, 03:56:32 AM
I would actually like to see a T.Rex chase a boat like in the book. Carnivorous dinosaurs could swim, so it's not an impossibility.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Undeadite on Jan 28, 2009, 04:02:49 AM
I think that was the best part of JP3 with the Stegosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 28, 2009, 04:26:17 AM
That's Spinosaurus. And the scene in the book was far superior.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: EEV2650 on Jan 28, 2009, 10:17:38 AM
I hated that damn Spinosaurus. I wonder if the Rex it killed in JP3 was the baby Rex from the lost world.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 28, 2009, 06:31:07 PM
Quote from: EEV2650 on Jan 28, 2009, 10:17:38 AM
I hated that damn Spinosaurus. I wonder if the Rex it killed in JP3 was the baby Rex from the lost world.

that's what i was wondering. i could have sworn i saw a scar on the leg when it walked over Grant. that was a shame it died. what a disgrace to the JP franchise.

the Spino sucked. i hope in the 4th, they have another show down, but this time, spino faces a 18 ft. bull t-rex and gets its ass whooped. and then eaten.  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 28, 2009, 06:32:29 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 28, 2009, 04:26:17 AM
That's Spinosaurus. And the scene in the book was far superior.

i agree.

it would be cool seeing that scene in the movie
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Jan 28, 2009, 07:23:47 PM
^please edit your post.

the best of JP3 for me was the raptor design and FX. Stan Winston was god.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Jan 28, 2009, 08:42:17 PM
JP3 is so darn entertaining. Loved the Spino, Raptors, music, action, pacing, it's all good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 28, 2009, 08:52:12 PM
JP3 was bleh. The ending especially was terrible. We go from an intense with raptors to all of a sudden, BOOM, marines show up ???
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Undeadite on Jan 28, 2009, 09:17:00 PM
Sorry, Spinosaurus got picked up on my spell check and i changed it without looking.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Jan 28, 2009, 11:20:46 PM
The endings of all the JP films have been lacklustre.  The first was the probably the best - even if it was a bit of a deus ex machina.  The San Diego stuff in JP2 was silly.  JP3 was good fun, but again the ending was rather dumb.  But Macy is a cack in that film, so it lifts it up a notch.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: severen76 on Jan 29, 2009, 12:07:07 AM
Deus ex machina? ( I learnt a new phrase)

Do you mean with the girl hacker restarting Jurassic park, and the Tyrannosaurus saving the day at the last second? It's been a while since I've seen it so I'm too sure on the particulars.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alienseseses on Jan 29, 2009, 12:11:46 AM
They're surrounded by raptors! Surely, with no way out, they're doomed? But wait! OUT OF NOWHERE comes a TREX who saves the day!

Deus ex machina- when a situation is solved by some random thing the writers threw in to resolve everything without the use of logic. When the writer says, I don't know how to save them, might as well have something unrelated save them.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Jan 29, 2009, 12:16:33 AM
It wasn't a big deus ex machina, because it had been previously established that the rex was on the loose, so it wasn't completely out of left field.  It was still extremely convenient though.

Lex restarting the computer system is flagged early on with Tim ribbing her about being a computer nerd so that's not really out of left field either.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Jan 29, 2009, 12:51:07 AM
the question is why didn't the T-rex chased the jeep in which the characters were fleeing after he killed the Raptors.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 29, 2009, 01:14:06 AM
Plus she had one on her neck, so she had something else to worry about. Plus posing for the camera after majorly pwning the raptor ;D 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Jan 29, 2009, 01:21:30 AM
Her feet got tangled up in the 'When dinosaurs ruled...' banner and she tripped over.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 29, 2009, 01:24:53 AM
How dare you imply the Queen is clumsy!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Jan 29, 2009, 02:25:58 AM
queen?

though the banner was near to the small front door when it fell, and the T-rex was too big to get out from there, so the only way would be the big service entrance behind it from where the third raptor came in too; (the one to the left covered by that plastic canvas.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 29, 2009, 02:32:12 AM
Yes. Tyrannosaurus Rex means Tyrant Lizard King, but since the T.Rex was female, I'm being politically correct and referring to her as Queen.

Saavy?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Jan 29, 2009, 02:42:30 AM
Ok but try to don't refer to her as a queen to avoid any confusion with "our" queen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Jan 29, 2009, 02:44:14 AM
So she's Tyrannosaurus Regina.

Or Tyrannosaurus Rani if she was Indian.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 29, 2009, 02:47:54 AM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Jan 29, 2009, 02:42:30 AM
Ok but try to don't refer to her as a queen to avoid any confusion with "our" queen.

Please, Rexy has way more style than your Queen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Jan 29, 2009, 04:03:17 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 29, 2009, 02:47:54 AM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Jan 29, 2009, 02:42:30 AM
Ok but try to don't refer to her as a queen to avoid any confusion with "our" queen.

Please, Rexy has way more style than your Queen.

THE queen, and yes i think she has way more style. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 29, 2009, 08:46:09 AM
For F sake just call it a t-rex, or tyrannosaur.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 29, 2009, 02:18:39 PM
No, Queeny is badass.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DARIAS93 on Jan 29, 2009, 02:37:53 PM
No...Lets called her The Bitch Rex ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 29, 2009, 04:42:59 PM
Or we could just called her a turd, because LOLOLOLOLOL thats an omg so funny name.
Tyrannosaur is all we need to call her.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 29, 2009, 10:47:29 PM
i liked the trailers in the lost world. they were just awesome. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Undeadite on Jan 29, 2009, 10:51:33 PM
I agree. When they went over the cliff I wanted to cry.  :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Jan 29, 2009, 11:56:47 PM
Shame that the probably the best part of the film was over at the halfway mark.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Undeadite on Jan 30, 2009, 12:00:37 AM
Oh I dont know if that was the best part. I rather liked the T-Rex in the city.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Jan 30, 2009, 12:11:23 AM
That sucked.  The premise was stupid and Postlethwaite and Vaughn just dropped completely out of the film.  It should've ended with a bigger climax on the island.

The trailers on the cliff was genuinely tense sequence, and was never topped for the remainder of the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Jan 30, 2009, 12:12:40 AM
The Rex rampage will always have a place in my heart because it was exactly what a 9 year old wanted.

f**k the raptor being killed by gymnastics though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Jan 30, 2009, 12:17:39 AM
My favourite scene from child hood was the whole Raptor scene at the old Ingen complex. When your 7 years old, watching Raptors go after people, leaping and jumping all over the place was just amazing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Jan 30, 2009, 12:19:05 AM
Yeah but like Yellow said, getting killed by gymnastics was a bit much.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Jan 30, 2009, 12:23:59 AM
Haha, I got upset at that part. Always wondered why it just stood there watching her.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Undeadite on Jan 30, 2009, 12:29:23 AM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Jan 30, 2009, 12:12:40 AM
The Rex rampage will always have a place in my heart because it was exactly what a 9 year old wanted.

Exactly! I remember sitting in the theater in complete awe.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Jan 30, 2009, 12:38:30 AM
And now?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 30, 2009, 12:55:17 AM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Jan 30, 2009, 12:12:40 AM
f**k the raptor being killed by gymnastics though.

Gotta disagree, that was pretty sik. T.Rex loose in Diego was fun too. "There's a dinosaur in our backyard." xD
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nobody on Jan 30, 2009, 02:57:32 AM
Well for once Fox didn't run a series into the ground. It died by itself.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Jan 30, 2009, 03:03:41 AM
Fox could never have run JP into the ground.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Newsfop on Jan 30, 2009, 01:01:39 PM
Quote from: Logan on Jan 30, 2009, 02:57:32 AM
Well for once Fox didn't run a series into the ground. It died by itself.

JP is Universal, not Fox.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Undeadite on Jan 30, 2009, 05:53:50 PM
Quote from: SM on Jan 30, 2009, 12:38:30 AM
And now?

My inner child still gets his rocks off when I watch that scene, so nothing has changed.  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 30, 2009, 05:58:48 PM
Quote from: War Wager on Jan 30, 2009, 12:23:59 AM
Haha, I got upset at that part. Always wondered why it just stood there watching her.

ha! i know, and do you remember the raptors face?

anyway, i thought the whole San Diego thing was awesome, i don't care who you are. also, did you notice that every time the main carnivore (t-rex, spino) made their biggest attack sequence in all 3 JPs, it was always raining?

the paddock scene, the trailer cliff scene, and the Ingen rig boat scene.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 30, 2009, 06:05:10 PM
Naturally. The rain makes it more intense.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Undeadite on Jan 30, 2009, 06:06:42 PM
Which sucks for the animitronic controllers, because giant robots and rain dont mix lmao.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Jan 30, 2009, 07:11:11 PM
No, but it made the dinos look even more real.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 30, 2009, 08:09:52 PM
Yeah!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 31, 2009, 02:32:22 AM
Quote from: Undeadite on Jan 30, 2009, 06:06:42 PM
Which sucks for the animitronic controllers, because giant robots and rain dont mix lmao.

How? The rain messes the controls up?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MudButt on Jan 31, 2009, 02:43:06 AM
Because el agua es muy bueno.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Undeadite on Jan 31, 2009, 02:45:24 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 31, 2009, 02:32:22 AM
Quote from: Undeadite on Jan 30, 2009, 06:06:42 PM
Which sucks for the animitronic controllers, because giant robots and rain dont mix lmao.

How? The rain messes the controls up?

Yup. They arent water proof lol. There is some great footage of the rex in number one shaking like a dog in the rain because the hydraulic systems kept screwing up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 31, 2009, 02:49:17 AM
Which scene does that occur in?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Jan 31, 2009, 02:55:22 AM
Off camera of coarse. ^ They had to batter it with towels to try and dry it off before the next scene.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nobody on Jan 31, 2009, 02:56:10 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 31, 2009, 02:49:17 AM
Which scene does that occur in?
It was also seen during the scene where it blows Doctor Grant's hat off
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Undeadite on Jan 31, 2009, 02:57:34 AM
yeah, I know for the first rex the skin would like absorb the water so it would shrink and the pics of it are hilarious. i think they managed to water proof them better for the second film, or at least u would think they at least tried.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Eroom on Jul 08, 2009, 09:28:59 PM
The Spinosaurus animatronic was however made waterproof, or however at least the material used for its skin was.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nobody on Jul 08, 2009, 09:39:20 PM
I sill don't see why it was cancelled. Why not continue it in his name?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 09, 2009, 02:07:51 PM
the film will still be made, its just not going to be any time soon. :'(

http://www.firstshowing.net/2009/06/17/producer-frank-marshall-says-jurassic-park-iv-is-a-long-shot/ (http://www.firstshowing.net/2009/06/17/producer-frank-marshall-says-jurassic-park-iv-is-a-long-shot/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Spidey3121 on Jul 09, 2009, 02:22:39 PM
Based on that article what makes you think the film will still be made? I mean, i guess you can just assume it's inevitable with the way Hollywood pumps out sequels + remakes these days but it's already been 6 years since the last 1.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Jul 09, 2009, 06:24:45 PM
QuoteI think the third movie was a good place to end anyway.

Uhuh? Even though I enjoyed III, The Lost World had one of those: "Yep, thats it!" endings.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2009, 11:56:10 PM
Using Michael Crichton's death as an excuse to not make the film is stupid and piss-weak. It's not like he worked on the third film, and they made it anyway.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 10, 2009, 12:11:02 AM
if you guys want to, you can join this forum to discuss all about JPIV

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/ (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: severen76 on Jul 10, 2009, 12:13:45 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2009, 11:56:10 PM
Using Michael Crichton's death as an excuse to not make the film is stupid and piss-weak. It's not like he worked on the third film, and they made it anyway.

And the 3rd film sucked. Maybe they're making the excuse for good reason.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: J-Syxx on Jul 10, 2009, 03:34:57 AM
They should've never made the second film. I think that was the point where Spielberg officially fell off.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 10, 2009, 04:33:07 PM
Quote from: severen76 on Jul 10, 2009, 12:13:45 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2009, 11:56:10 PM
Using Michael Crichton's death as an excuse to not make the film is stupid and piss-weak. It's not like he worked on the third film, and they made it anyway.

And the 3rd film sucked. Maybe they're making the excuse for good reason.

I disagree. If Spielberg directed it, I think it could be salvaged.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: J-Syxx on Jul 11, 2009, 12:23:39 AM
I'm convinced Spielberg can't make good movies anymore after Indy 4.  He's become a generic director of kids' movies who focuses too much on CGI.  Jurassic Park was in part successful because of the horror elements.  Spielberg doesn't have the balls anymore to do anything remotely scary or terrifying.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: randy4321 on Jul 11, 2009, 01:05:47 AM
Quote from: fluxcap on Apr 26, 2007, 07:07:43 PM
Easy, someone finds out John Hammond's underwater laboratory for sea-dino's. They plan ANOTHER expedition, they convince Alan Grant AGAIN to come along. They arrive, the guy with the big gun dies first and then a bunch of underwater shenanigans ensue (similar to Deep Blue Sea) with an eventual confrontation with a Kronosaurus. Eventually Grant makes it to the surface to be saved by a helicopter and the film will fade out AGAIN with pterodactyls flying alongside the helicopter while the Jurassic Park theme plays in the background. And there we have Jurassic Park 4: The Lost Undersea World  ;)
Lol sounds very interesting if u ask me, but would not like that to be Jurassic Park 4 ^_^ oh and dont forget the final conflict with the villian A.K.A the big bad dinosaur whether it be a plesiosaur or stalking hybrid. but still I have been looking forward to JP4 for the past 5 years and have gotten speculation dates for the summer of 09,08,07,06 and 05 and so far all have been wrong, although through MTV news laura did say then were in either development or production im not sure cuz that news was a while ago, but am still excited about this movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 11, 2009, 05:56:53 AM
Quote from: J-Syxx on Jul 11, 2009, 12:23:39 AM
I'm convinced Spielberg can't make good movies anymore after Indy 4.  He's become a generic director of kids' movies who focuses too much on CGI.  Jurassic Park was in part successful because of the horror elements.  Spielberg doesn't have the balls anymore to do anything remotely scary or terrifying.

JP wasn't horror. Please describe these 'horror elements' you speak of.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Jul 11, 2009, 08:20:14 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 11, 2009, 05:56:53 AMJP wasn't horror. Please describe these 'horror elements' you speak of.

It wasn't a horror movie, but I think there were some horror elements in it.

Like the scene with Nedry and the Dilophosaurus, the scene with Muldoon and the raptors, and perhaps the part with the worker getting killed by raptors in the beginning. I don't know if those count as horror, but they scared me when I was a kid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 11, 2009, 03:59:20 PM
Obviously that scared you as a kid, what doesn't scare you as a kid? As an adult however, those scenes don't scare me. They're certainly suspenseful but scary? No.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Jul 11, 2009, 04:07:36 PM
Actually, I still find the scene with the Dilophosaurus more scary than many horror movies (like Friday the 13th and movies like that). But I get your point, and it makes sense.  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: randy4321 on Jul 11, 2009, 04:26:43 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Jul 11, 2009, 08:20:14 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 11, 2009, 05:56:53 AMJP wasn't horror. Please describe these 'horror elements' you speak of.

It wasn't a horror movie, but I think there were some horror elements in it.

Like the scene with Nedry and the Dilophosaurus, the scene with Muldoon and the raptors, and perhaps the part with the worker getting killed by raptorts in the beginning. I don't know if those count as horror, but they scared me when I was a kid.
Wow I always watched the first jurassic park growing up even though I was a kid I still loved those scene's in particular (didnt scare me) , I guess if you have a genuine like for dinosaurs the movie doesnt scare u much
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Jul 11, 2009, 04:31:49 PM
Quote from: randy4321 on Jul 11, 2009, 04:26:43 PMI guess if you have a genuine like for dinosaurs the movie doesnt scare u much

I was crazy about dinosaurs when I was a kid and when I saw the movie. I still found those scenes scary. Sure, dinosaurs was cool and interesting, but seeing people get eaten by them was still... unsettling.  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: randy4321 on Jul 11, 2009, 04:33:17 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Jul 11, 2009, 04:31:49 PM
Quote from: randy4321 on Jul 11, 2009, 04:26:43 PMI guess if you have a genuine like for dinosaurs the movie doesnt scare u much

I was crazy about dinosaurs when I was a kid and when I saw the movie. I still found those scenes scary. Sure, dinosaurs was cool and interesting, but seeing people get eaten by them was still... unsettling.  :P
I loved it lol.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 11, 2009, 06:48:23 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Jul 11, 2009, 04:31:49 PM
Quote from: randy4321 on Jul 11, 2009, 04:26:43 PMI guess if you have a genuine like for dinosaurs the movie doesnt scare u much

I was crazy about dinosaurs when I was a kid and when I saw the movie. I still found those scenes scary. Sure, dinosaurs was cool and interesting, but seeing people get eaten by them was still... unsettling.  :P

This. The first time I saw JP in theatres I was 6, and the scene with Ellie and the raptor in the electricity shed had me ducking for cover behind the cinema seats lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: EEV2650 on Jul 11, 2009, 07:14:32 PM
I saw JP in a drive in theater in ohio back in 1993. If there was a scary part in the film it would have been the Robert Muldoon death scene.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jul 11, 2009, 07:43:57 PM
Lost World: JP and JPIII where the only JP movies that I saw in threaters. I was only two when the first movie cameout.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: randy4321 on Jul 11, 2009, 08:13:08 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Jul 11, 2009, 07:43:57 PM
Lost World: JP and JPIII where the only JP movies that I saw in threaters. I was only two when the first movie cameout.
when did the movie come out cuz I was born that year.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Jul 11, 2009, 08:31:34 PM
Quote from: randy4321 on Jul 11, 2009, 08:13:08 PMwhen did the movie come out cuz I was born that year.

Shouldn't you know which year it was released, if you were born the same year?  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Mr.X on Jul 11, 2009, 08:35:06 PM
I think he means month which is July if I remember correctly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: randy4321 on Jul 11, 2009, 10:46:25 PM
Quote from: Mr.X on Jul 11, 2009, 08:35:06 PM
I think he means month which is July if I remember correctly.
I was born july 19, 1992 so yeahh same year not sure about month
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Jul 12, 2009, 04:59:03 AM
 i think its 1993.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 12, 2009, 05:00:42 AM
June 11, 1993 was JP's official release date.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Kimarhi on Jul 12, 2009, 05:29:58 AM
I had just turned eight and thought Jurassic Park was the best movie evah.

Then about two years later I saw Aliens.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Übermensch on Jul 12, 2009, 05:49:54 AM
I saw it in 1993 and the theatre was packed for that movie.

I'm not looking forward to IV though because the sequels were bad and inferior to the original.  Plus it won't have anything to do with Micheal Crichton since he's dead.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Private Hudson on Jul 12, 2009, 07:56:12 AM
I was so damn young I don't even remember it, yet my mom said it was the first movie I ever saw (Even if I was a baby). Great parenting if I say so myself, raised on good movies. God I feel sorry for kids who were born in this decade. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sylizar on Jul 12, 2009, 08:27:04 AM
I don't, I like alot of the movies released nowadays. Anyway, I recently re-watched Jurassic Park, and I payed more attention to how he mentioned Dinosaurs turned into birds (as a theory). I figured for Jurassic Park IV, that should be played on, and we should have...FLYING DINOSAURS! (A running joke with my friends BTW) Imagine a flying T.Rex, then remember to thank me when you realize how awesome it is.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 12, 2009, 03:16:03 PM
Quote from: Private Hudson on Jul 12, 2009, 07:56:12 AM
I was so damn young I don't even remember it, yet my mom said it was the first movie I ever saw (Even if I was a baby). Great parenting if I say so myself, raised on good movies. God I feel sorry for kids who were born in this decade. ;D

same here ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Jul 12, 2009, 09:31:24 PM
I can remember I went to see TLW with my mum when it came out. Bought myself a swirly straw with a Compy coiled 'round it. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TheMonolith on Jul 13, 2009, 04:23:07 AM
I think the next film should star Lex and Tim and be based off the game Tresspasser.
I do not care about the negativity. This game, IMO, was pretty good and I still think it has great replay value. The setting and look was perfect for JP and I would love to see this odyssey put to screen. If done right, it could be just as good as the first film, kind of like JP meets Deliverance.............without that one scene from the latter.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: wolfboy22 on Jul 13, 2009, 05:58:46 PM
I've always liked those "that was close" moments in the Jurassic Park movies but some of them were just BS.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: randy4321 on Jul 13, 2009, 06:14:55 PM
Quote from: TheMonolith on Jul 13, 2009, 04:23:07 AM
I think the next film should star Lex and Tim and be based off the game Tresspasser.
I do not care about the negativity. This game, IMO, was pretty good and I still think it has great replay value. The setting and look was perfect for JP and I would love to see this odyssey put to screen. If done right, it could be just as good as the first film, kind of like JP meets Deliverance.............without that one scene from the latter.
That game is the best jp game know to date next to op: genesis so much fun, that would be pretty cool.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: cloverfan98 on Jul 13, 2009, 08:06:45 PM
I've been waiting to see more dinosaurs get off thge island and get to the main land for JP4. But other then that I have no idea where the sequel should go.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hybrid PM on Jul 13, 2009, 11:45:13 PM
The studio should stop trying to complicate things. Keep the plot relatively simple. Bring back Dr. Grant, Dr. Satler and Dr. Malcolm. This is the basic plot: A scientific expidition is being set to go to Isla Sorna under a new corporation who now owns Ingen.

In the opening scene we go back to Isla Nublar, we see what remains of the old park as a group of 3 mercinaries treks through the park looking for an item relative to the plot, but of course they are attacked.

The 3 original cast members get recruited as advisers to the scientific expedition team. Through different reasons they all agree to go on the expedition. But the new executive is not who he seems and is actually planning something else for the dinosaurs and for the team. So the team gets caught in the middle of the mayhem.

And we find out why Ingen is creating new species of dinos that were not on the original list like the Spinosaurus and the Pteronadons.

The dinos returning in the film should be T-Rex, Spinosaurus (rematch please), Raptors, Triceratops, Pteronadons, and a bunch of Herbavores that nobody really cares about. New dinosaurs should include Utah Raptor the new badie, Carnotaurus, and a cameo by Dilophosaurus.  
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Jul 13, 2009, 11:57:49 PM
The plots for all three films are very simple, especially JP3.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hybrid PM on Jul 14, 2009, 12:03:18 AM
i mean dinosaurs packing heat work complicate things.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: cloverfan98 on Jul 14, 2009, 12:08:06 AM
Quote from: Hybrid PM on Jul 13, 2009, 11:45:13 PM
The studio should stop trying to complicate things. Keep the plot relatively simple. Bring back Dr. Grant, Dr. Satler and Dr. Malcolm. This is the basic plot: A scientific expidition is being set to go to Isla Sorna under a new corporation who now owns Ingen.

In the opening scene we go back to Isla Nublar, we see what remains of the old park as a group of 3 mercinaries treks through the park looking for an item relative to the plot, but of course they are attacked.

The 3 original cast members get recruited as advisers to the scientific expedition team. Through different reasons they all agree to go on the expedition. But the new executive is not who he seems and is actually planning something else for the dinosaurs and for the team. So the team gets caught in the middle of the mayhem.

And we find out why Ingen is creating new species of dinos that were not on the original list like the Spinosaurus and the Pteronadons.

The dinos returning in the film should be T-Rex, Spinosaurus (rematch please), Raptors, Triceratops, Pteronadons, and a bunch of Herbavores that nobody really cares about. New dinosaurs should include Utah Raptor the new badie, Carnotaurus, and a cameo by Dilophosaurus.  

That would pretty cool. I like it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Jul 14, 2009, 12:37:29 AM
Quote from: Hybrid PM on Jul 13, 2009, 11:45:13 PM
The studio should stop trying to complicate things. Keep the plot relatively simple. Bring back Dr. Grant, Dr. Satler and Dr. Malcolm. This is the basic plot: A scientific expidition is being set to go to Isla Sorna under a new corporation who now owns Ingen.

In the opening scene we go back to Isla Nublar, we see what remains of the old park as a group of 3 mercinaries treks through the park looking for an item relative to the plot, but of course they are attacked.

The 3 original cast members get recruited as advisers to the scientific expedition team. Through different reasons they all agree to go on the expedition. But the new executive is not who he seems and is actually planning something else for the dinosaurs and for the team. So the team gets caught in the middle of the mayhem.

And we find out why Ingen is creating new species of dinos that were not on the original list like the Spinosaurus and the Pteronadons.

The dinos returning in the film should be T-Rex, Spinosaurus (rematch please), Raptors, Triceratops, Pteronadons, and a bunch of Herbavores that nobody really cares about. New dinosaurs should include Utah Raptor the new badie, Carnotaurus, and a cameo by Dilophosaurus.   

utahraptor? didnt the ones in the previous movies where?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The One and Only on Jul 14, 2009, 02:21:34 AM
I think the dinos heading, and landing on the mainland should be the crux of the next flick. It was touched on a little bit in the second flick, and seemed to be something that Spielberg and co. was wanting to go for at the end of the third. Besides, it's getting a bit more harder to explain why people would keep going to the island only to be chased around by the dinos yet again. Rumor had it that the color changing dinos from the second book were supposed to show up in the second as stowaways on the S.S. Venture(the ship hauling the T-Rex), and were the ones responsible for the massacre on board. Then the sneaky buggers would've slipped off the ship during the chaos, and end up causing trouble down the road. However I still would've liked to see the gun wielding dinosaurs that would've shown up in the John Sayles script for JP4. Heck, Hasbro even liked the idear , and we would've got some neat action figures out of the deal.  :) But one idea I might go for is this one.>http://www.jplegacy.org/home.php?load=toys/jpcetgalm.shtml (http://www.jplegacy.org/home.php?load=toys/jpcetgalm.shtml)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 14, 2009, 06:22:52 AM
Quote from: Hybrid PM on Jul 13, 2009, 11:45:13 PM
The studio should stop trying to complicate things. Keep the plot relatively simple. Bring back Dr. Grant, Dr. Satler and Dr. Malcolm. This is the basic plot: A scientific expidition is being set to go to Isla Sorna under a new corporation who now owns Ingen.

In the opening scene we go back to Isla Nublar, we see what remains of the old park as a group of 3 mercinaries treks through the park looking for an item relative to the plot, but of course they are attacked.

The 3 original cast members get recruited as advisers to the scientific expedition team. Through different reasons they all agree to go on the expedition. But the new executive is not who he seems and is actually planning something else for the dinosaurs and for the team. So the team gets caught in the middle of the mayhem.

And we find out why Ingen is creating new species of dinos that were not on the original list like the Spinosaurus and the Pteronadons.

The dinos returning in the film should be T-Rex, Spinosaurus (rematch please), Raptors, Triceratops, Pteronadons, and a bunch of Herbavores that nobody really cares about. New dinosaurs should include Utah Raptor the new badie, Carnotaurus, and a cameo by Dilophosaurus.  

Well first off, Pteranodons are not dinosaurs, they are flying reptiles called Pterosaurs.

Second...good list of dinos there, but I'd go for less. Fewer Velociraptors, T.Rex with a bigger role, another Spinosaurus, an active Trike like in TLW, and an ankylosaur, also with an active role and not just a cameo like in JP 3.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: cab12394 on Jul 15, 2009, 09:57:10 PM
If there were gonna be a movie, I would defenentaly want to see a fight between a raptor, and a dilophosaurus.(Full size ones, not like the ones in the first movie.)
But the realist in me, tends to doubt it..... that there will ever be a 4th chapter......
IS THIS THE END OF JP AS WE KNOW IT???

DA DADA DA!!

Hey look! It's STEPHEN SPEILBURG!!!
;DLOL
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 15, 2009, 11:28:15 PM
Full sized Velociraptor would lose very quickly, seeing as how a full-sized Dilophosaurus was 20 feet long. A Velociraptor isn't much bigger than a poodle.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hybrid PM on Jul 16, 2009, 12:18:57 AM
Yeah the raptors in the movie were actually Deinonychus......

I'd love to see the Utah Raptor in the next JP movie. Damn that be so sick!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: randy4321 on Jul 16, 2009, 12:43:41 AM
Quote from: Hybrid PM on Jul 16, 2009, 12:18:57 AM
Yeah the raptors in the movie were actually Deinonychus......

I'd love to see the Utah Raptor in the next JP movie. Damn that be so sick!!!
Yeah I wish they would have stayed along the lines of non-fiction with the dilophosaurus and raptor, Utah raptor would be an amazing sight.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: out-at-night-mostly on Jul 16, 2009, 09:12:18 AM
To be honest i want to see a Giganotosaurus or something large, murderous and aquatic (Liuperodon #typo# and kronosaurus). But a rematch between the Spino and T-rex with the latter winning would be sweet :)

Oh yes and please no Spetsnaz Raptor capping up scientist and red neck hunters with geared out m4A1, that just feel and look wrong :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nobody on Jul 16, 2009, 02:52:01 PM
What would be worse is if we find out InGEN gets bought up by Wal-Mart

(Nice AR joke for all you Alien fans)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hybrid PM on Jul 16, 2009, 03:44:15 PM
Quote from: Logan on Jul 16, 2009, 02:52:01 PM
What would be worse is if we find out InGEN gets bought up by Wal-Mart

(Nice AR joke for all you Alien fans)
lol thats when i walk out of the movie theater!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Mike’s Monsters on Jul 17, 2009, 04:40:00 AM
Kind of off topic, but this has always bugged me in The Lost World.
I love the movie, but when the boat with the Rex hits the mainland...
What killed the crew? It couldn't have been the Rex...
I have never figured this out, I think it could possibly be the biggest plot hole in history.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hybrid PM on Jul 17, 2009, 04:55:12 AM
Quote from: Mikey on Jul 17, 2009, 04:40:00 AM
Kind of off topic, but this has always bugged me in The Lost World.
I love the movie, but when the boat with the Rex hits the mainland...
What killed the crew? It couldn't have been the Rex...
I have never figured this out, I think it could possibly be the biggest plot hole in history.

You got that right bro, the explanation I tend to run with is before or right after the boat takes off from the island with the Rex, a smaller dinosaur got on board and killed all of the crew, then got off the boat.

Or if you remember the Pteronadons where not in the cage at the end of Lost World, maybe a couple of them killed the crew. But then that would screw up the continuity with JP3 when they fly off the island.

I guess we'll never know what Spielberg intended. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Jul 17, 2009, 05:21:07 AM
Quote from: Hybrid PM on Jul 17, 2009, 04:55:12 AM
You got that right bro, the explanation I tend to run with is before or right after the boat takes off from the island with the Rex, a smaller dinosaur got on board and killed all of the crew, then got off the boat.

If that were true, the boat would have never made it to San Diego, as there would be no one running it.

http://www.jplegacy.org/home.php?load=jurassicpark2/fftlwventureattack.shtml
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hybrid PM on Jul 17, 2009, 05:30:07 AM
Thats interesting, I'll go with that!

So the Rex had to have a little help from something else unknown.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Jul 17, 2009, 06:06:36 AM
dhilophosaurus, maybe?

not big enough to make such a mess
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nobody on Jul 17, 2009, 08:30:21 AM
The original JPIV script solved that problem; Raptors.

It would've been Godzilla 98 all over again
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predatorfandrc90 on Jul 17, 2009, 07:48:02 PM
Quote from: CELTICPRED on Apr 26, 2007, 06:47:49 PM
How and why would they develop the whole movie to be surrounded around a submarine dino?
Actually its an aquatic reptile.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jul 17, 2009, 09:34:01 PM
I think the Rex killed the crew since he was the only dino on the boat from what I can remember.

QuoteI think it could possibly be the biggest plot hole in history.

The Black Star Dragon Balls are a bigger plot hole  ;).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The One and Only on Jul 18, 2009, 03:58:12 AM
That series of events would've been more better explained if they had used the Carnotaurs(the color changers) to explain what happened to the crew. It would've been a great way to introduce them. It also matches up with some of the events in the novels where it was learned that despite all the precautions taken, some of the dinosaurs were still able to get off the islands.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 18, 2009, 08:55:54 AM
The Carnotaurs would not have fit on the boat itself, outside of the cargo hold. Good idea in principle, but I don't see it happening within the movie. Besides, it would've been a bad time to introduce a new dinosaur since the T.Rex had the rest of the film devoted to itself.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TheMonolith on Jul 18, 2009, 04:38:09 PM
I always thought that the raptors got them and just hopped off the boat when it started to move.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 18, 2009, 04:49:19 PM
The boat would still have needed someone steering it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Jul 18, 2009, 05:12:58 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 18, 2009, 04:49:19 PM
The boat would still have needed someone steering it.

maybe that was Ash's hand


(evil dead)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TheMonolith on Jul 18, 2009, 06:36:54 PM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Jul 18, 2009, 05:12:58 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 18, 2009, 04:49:19 PM
The boat would still have needed someone steering it.

maybe that was Ash's hand


(evil dead)

Ha! That was good.  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hybrid PM on Jul 18, 2009, 08:51:03 PM
I think it was supposed to be the T-Rex that killed everyone on the boat... Spielberg just didnt emphasize the damage to the ship enough.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Kimarhi on Jul 19, 2009, 04:39:50 AM
I always thought the rex got out and munched on people, and whoever was left to shut the cargo hold was mortally wounded when he did so.  I'm also pretty sure that ships have auto pilots like planes do.  Or it could've simply drifted back to shore.  Arent the islands close to Costa Rica?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Übermensch on Jul 19, 2009, 04:41:58 AM
^I doubt it.  That scene was incredibly far-fetched.

And the Godzilla homage after that was just ridiculous.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Kimarhi on Jul 19, 2009, 04:45:49 AM
The whole sequence was incredibly far fetched.  I usually stop watching when they leave the island.  Feels like a different movie.  JP2 came out before Godzilla though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Jul 19, 2009, 04:11:37 PM
Was there any scene in particular that was a Godzilla homage, or was it the whole thing with the T-Rex in the city?

And there were plenty of japanese Godzilla movie before The Lost World.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Mike’s Monsters on Jul 19, 2009, 04:49:41 PM
The scene with the Asian men running away in fear of the Rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 19, 2009, 06:46:10 PM
It's not really a homage, just an easter egg IMO. They scream out "I left Japan to get away from this shit!!!" or something to that effect.

The only homage in the movie was right before the T.Rex does the dribbling motion while passing the basketball net, was when he scratches his ear. Supposedly that was a reference to the Rex in King Kong doing the same.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Kimarhi on Jul 19, 2009, 07:02:24 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Jul 19, 2009, 04:11:37 PM
Was there any scene in particular that was a Godzilla homage, or was it the whole thing with the T-Rex in the city?

And there were plenty of japanese Godzilla movie before The Lost World.

I thought he had mentioned the 98 american godzilla earlier.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Jul 20, 2009, 12:51:45 AM
QuoteThe only homage in the movie was right before the T.Rex does the dribbling motion while passing the basketball net, was when he scratches his ear. Supposedly that was a reference to the Rex in King Kong doing the same.

You missed the name of the ship?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 20, 2009, 07:42:45 AM
That too, yeah. Forgot about that one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Jul 20, 2009, 09:26:54 PM
Venture 888.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hybrid PM on Jul 20, 2009, 10:03:37 PM
I think it be f**king  badass to see this guy again on the big screen!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi19.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fb157%2Fruffryderx07%2Fdiphlo.jpg&hash=c488f551c4c5840d67ef45dd68e2e695626bf860)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Johnny Handsome on Jul 20, 2009, 10:07:18 PM
Quote from: Hybrid PM on Jul 20, 2009, 10:03:37 PM
I think it be f**king  badass to see this guy again on the big screen!

http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b157/ruffryderx07/diphlo.jpg
Unfortunately, when he ate Dennis Nedry he became a vegetarian.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Jul 21, 2009, 12:33:53 AM
Had a heart attack from all the fat more like.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 21, 2009, 01:20:32 AM
Or he broke his jaw, biting through all that skin.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Jul 21, 2009, 01:26:34 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwiki.chakuriki.net%2Fen%2Fimages%2Fthumb%2F9%2F94%2FWayneknight.jpg%2F180px-Wayneknight.jpg&hash=8f460299c8f330850e2cf4de1772e281847a2041)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Jul 21, 2009, 01:33:11 AM
"How much?  That's in yen right??"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hybrid PM on Jul 21, 2009, 09:43:18 PM
Hello "Newman!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Huol on Jul 21, 2009, 10:26:46 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffallingawake.files.wordpress.com%2F2006%2F11%2Fnewman.jpg&hash=671d43fe0cf3ca972cb9f86da68142b339fc3209)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: cloverfan98 on Jul 25, 2009, 04:30:16 AM
I liked that guy in the movie. Yeah it would be awesome to see the Spitter return.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nobody on Jul 25, 2009, 06:53:58 PM
The worst they can do is try to remake JP
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Jul 25, 2009, 06:59:04 PM


Epic at 48 seconds in.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nobody on Jul 25, 2009, 07:03:58 PM


Better
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TheEyesThatDissapeared on Jul 25, 2009, 08:09:48 PM
Quote from: Huol on Jul 21, 2009, 10:26:46 PM
http://fallingawake.files.wordpress.com/2006/11/newman.jpg
listen to his laugh in jp when he first opens up the shaving cream can. its weirdly hilarious, and i have never heard ANYONE laugh that way!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Huol on Jul 25, 2009, 09:34:46 PM
Quote from: TheEyesThatDissapeared on Jul 25, 2009, 08:09:48 PM
Quote from: Huol on Jul 21, 2009, 10:26:46 PM
http://fallingawake.files.wordpress.com/2006/11/newman.jpg
listen to his laugh in jp when he first opens up the shaving cream can. its weirdly hilarious, and i have never heard ANYONE laugh that way!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 27, 2009, 02:34:07 PM
I found his laughing weird only because I was wondering where the humous was in opening a can of shaving cream :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: wolfboy22 on Jul 27, 2009, 05:42:08 PM
That laugh oh my :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Private Hudson on Jul 27, 2009, 09:27:11 PM
Laugh sounded like a dinosuar! :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Aug 07, 2009, 01:56:11 PM
Ultimate laugh:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBxgAmdPQWg&feature=related
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ShadowPred on Aug 07, 2009, 02:07:01 PM
LOL
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: randy4321 on Aug 18, 2009, 05:42:36 AM
Speaking of jurassic park anyone getting the new Jurassic park 2K9 toys? I think there exclusive at Toys R Us
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: severen76 on Aug 18, 2009, 06:19:57 AM
Eh..

Those toys are just re-paints of the Jurassic Park 3 figures.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: randy4321 on Aug 18, 2009, 05:49:58 PM
Quote from: severen76 on Aug 18, 2009, 06:19:57 AM
Eh..

Those toys are just re-paints of the Jurassic Park 3 figures.
not the Bull T-rex
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: XenoVC on Aug 18, 2009, 06:31:48 PM
That's a repaint of The Lost World Bull T-Rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 19, 2009, 01:32:22 AM
There are new JP toys?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Eroom on Aug 19, 2009, 12:16:48 PM
The newly repainted toys seem to be a precursor of the shelved Jurassic Park IV movie. It's a marketing campaign to keep the Jurassic Park franchise alive and inform the public and movie world that the franchise is not dead yet. This film won't happen for a long shot, but when it does, I hope that they introduce some new dinosaurs that rival the Velociraptors. We got a rival for the Tyrannosaurus Rex; now we need one for the cunning Velociraptors. Speaking of Tyrannosaurus Rex, I hope that the new movie will have a battle between a Triceratops and a Tyrannosaurus Rex. A classic dinosaur battle worthy of recognition in one of the most well-recognised dinosaur movies in movie dinosaur history.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hybrid PM on Aug 19, 2009, 03:59:00 PM
There will be another movie. But it might take a while, look how long it took to make Indy 4. As for some new stuff I'd like to see the Utah Raptor and possibly a full grown Dilophosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Aug 19, 2009, 10:06:37 PM
I have a huge box of JP toys in my basement from when I was younger. I love the movies and hope a fourth one comes out!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 21, 2009, 06:09:13 AM
Quote from: Xenomorphic King on Aug 19, 2009, 12:16:48 PM
The newly repainted toys seem to be a precursor of the shelved Jurassic Park IV movie. It's a marketing campaign to keep the Jurassic Park franchise alive and inform the public and movie world that the franchise is not dead yet. This film won't happen for a long shot, but when it does, I hope that they introduce some new dinosaurs that rival the Velociraptors. We got a rival for the Tyrannosaurus Rex; now we need one for the cunning Velociraptors. Speaking of Tyrannosaurus Rex, I hope that the new movie will have a battle between a Triceratops and a Tyrannosaurus Rex. A classic dinosaur battle worthy of recognition in one of the most well-recognised dinosaur movies in movie dinosaur history.

I want to see more herbivore action man...like the scene with the Stegosaurs in TLW. Do something with some Ankylosaurs, that'd be awesome since they only got a quick cameo in JP 3. And there isn't much to rival the Velociraptors, unfortunately. They made them smarter than they really were, and they have been been as large as Deinonychus. One size bigger you get Utahraptor, in which case you might as well stick with T.Rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Aug 21, 2009, 06:28:11 AM
I worte a JP fanscript years ago that had lots of ankys.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 21, 2009, 03:01:07 PM
Still have it around somewhere?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: wolfboy22 on Aug 21, 2009, 08:11:25 PM
Any updates?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ShadowPred on Aug 21, 2009, 08:15:09 PM
On the movie? No, so far it's been shelved or dead, one of the two.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Master Chief on Aug 21, 2009, 08:24:37 PM
Quote from: SM on Aug 21, 2009, 06:28:11 AM
I worte a JP fanscript years ago that had lots of ankys.

I remember the script and it was good.  The nod to 'Walking with Dinosaurs' was a good touch.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hybrid PM on Aug 21, 2009, 09:26:04 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Aug 21, 2009, 06:09:13 AM
Quote from: Xenomorphic King on Aug 19, 2009, 12:16:48 PM
The newly repainted toys seem to be a precursor of the shelved Jurassic Park IV movie. It's a marketing campaign to keep the Jurassic Park franchise alive and inform the public and movie world that the franchise is not dead yet. This film won't happen for a long shot, but when it does, I hope that they introduce some new dinosaurs that rival the Velociraptors. We got a rival for the Tyrannosaurus Rex; now we need one for the cunning Velociraptors. Speaking of Tyrannosaurus Rex, I hope that the new movie will have a battle between a Triceratops and a Tyrannosaurus Rex. A classic dinosaur battle worthy of recognition in one of the most well-recognised dinosaur movies in movie dinosaur history.

I want to see more herbivore action man...like the scene with the Stegosaurs in TLW. Do something with some Ankylosaurs, that'd be awesome since they only got a quick cameo in JP 3. And there isn't much to rival the Velociraptors, unfortunately. They made them smarter than they really were, and they have been been as large as Deinonychus. One size bigger you get Utahraptor, in which case you might as well stick with T.Rex.
More herbivore action would be great, in JPIII they did almost nothing..... I hated that they changed the raptors appearence in the last one. So now that means there are two species of Raptor on the Island. In the next movie I'd like them to mention the fact that we've now seen two species of raptor, and I'd like to see the Utah Raptor but just one. A big rouge badass. Like the big female raptor in JP.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 22, 2009, 07:50:25 PM
I liked the change in appearance. It's more up to date with the latest science.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Aug 24, 2009, 02:43:27 AM
QuoteStill have it around somewhere?

Here.  At least until Geocities shuts down. (http://www.geocities.com/mangocat.geo/JP_3rd.doc)

I just had a re-read and despite some rather cringe worthy parts it's still not a bad story overall.  It was intended to be much more a combat movie than anything else.

Oh, and it was written before I saw JP3, so the couple of gags that seem to be ripping off gags in JP3 were purely coincidental.

And it had Polacanthus in it - not Ankys after all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Johnny Handsome on Aug 24, 2009, 03:01:16 AM
Quote from: SM on Aug 24, 2009, 02:43:27 AM
QuoteStill have it around somewhere?

Here.  At least until Geocities shuts down. (http://www.geocities.com/mangocat.geo/JP_3rd.doc)

I just had a re-read and despite some rather cringe worthy parts it's still not a bad story overall.  It was intended to be much more a combat movie than anything else.

Oh, and it was written before I saw JP3, so the couple of gags that seem to be ripping off gags in JP3 were purely coincidental.

And it had Polacanthus in it - not Ankys after all.
It's not bad at all, we should do a fanfilm out of it, we split the work up, 50/50, you're doing all the Dino's and i do the poster, what do you think?

Now i know what you're username stands for, i always thought you were a SM fetishist or something  :-[
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Aug 24, 2009, 03:08:57 AM
Sorry to disappoint.  ;D

I actually wrote it for someone else, and he objected to some of the fruity language I used - so I changed it (the worst I used was "shit" which from memory was spoken twice in the original film).  Then he said he didn't want it because I couldn't stick to his brief.  :D  Which was funny cos there was no brief.

I have considered doing a 3D animated version of it, and made a short film with a oversized raptor chasing my daughter around the park over the road some years ago, but I've always had too many other things on, and am reluctant to invest more time on another fan film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 24, 2009, 03:13:23 AM
Polacanthus...have to give you props for that one. Certainly isn't a popular dinosaur! I'll give your script a read through soon.

Speaking of JP, I just re-watched the original film on my theatre room's 104" projector screen...what an experience :o Watching the T.Rex emerge out of her paddock and seeing the Brachiosaurus for the first time had me crying tears of joy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Johnny Handsome on Aug 24, 2009, 03:19:23 AM
Quote from: SM on Aug 24, 2009, 03:08:57 AM
Sorry to disappoint.  ;D

I actually wrote it for someone else, and he objected to some of the fruity language I used - so I changed it (the worst I used was "shit" which from memory was spoken twice in the original film).  Then he said he didn't want it because I couldn't stick to his brief.  :D  Which was funny cos there was no brief.

I have considered doing a 3D animated version of it, and made a short film with a oversized raptor chasing my daughter around the park over the road some years ago, but I've always had too many other things on, and am reluctant to invest more time on another fan film.
Sounds interesting, but you never posted the footage online right?
I would love to do something with Dino's.

I have done 2 fanfilms by now, all simple action flicks, one is an action comedy and one is Commando style, pumped with effects and action stock footage.

But i have never inserted a 3D model into a live action shot by now, and i would just love to do something with Dino's. I could never ever model one by myself as i'm more of a Lightning/Texturing guy, but do you know where i can find 3D Dino models?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Aug 24, 2009, 05:33:09 AM
QuoteSounds interesting, but you never posted the footage online right?

No.  It was just a muck around home movie for the kids.

For this Star Wars film I've been doing for some years, it's nothing but combining live action with CG (with generally lack lustre results) - be it comping actors shot against badly lit greenscreens, on to digital sets, or comping in digital starships and droids.  For a film that will eventually run to around 40 minutes, I could probably count the number of shots that didn't need some sort of digital effects on one hand.

As for dinosaurs, I used Poser which comes with a raptor model.  I mucked around with the proportions to make it look more like a Rex, then gave it a walk cycle (very simple in Poser), then set about matching into the footage which I foolishly didn't lock off.

I have a bunch of dinosaur Poser models at home that I download yonks ago, but the follow up I was going to make when the Second Born came along never eventuated because I wanted to use quadrupedal dinosaurs and as Poser is more for humans, quadruped walk cycles are a pain in the arse.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Sep 12, 2009, 04:24:12 PM
i just want to say that i haven't been on in a awhile cause my computer is down.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ScarFace the Vanguard on Sep 12, 2009, 04:48:17 PM
I would love to see a JP4. Spinosaurus, 4 Trex's, Allosaurus pack, acrocanthosaurus, giganotosaurus charcarodontosaurus and of course the raptors. :) :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nobody on Sep 12, 2009, 06:43:48 PM
Quote from: ScarFace the Vanguard on Sep 12, 2009, 04:48:17 PM
I would love to see a JP4. Spinosaurus, 4 Trex's, Allosaurus pack, acrocanthosaurus, giganotosaurus charcarodontosaurus and of course the raptors. :) :)
Someone played Operation Genesis.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ScarFace the Vanguard on Oct 04, 2009, 11:20:11 PM
Quote from: Nobody on Sep 12, 2009, 06:43:48 PM
Quote from: ScarFace the Vanguard on Sep 12, 2009, 04:48:17 PM
I would love to see a JP4. Spinosaurus, 4 Trex's, Allosaurus pack, acrocanthosaurus, giganotosaurus charcarodontosaurus and of course the raptors. :) :)
Someone played Operation Genesis.
Actually I haven't. I just know a lot of dinosurs ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: genocyber on Oct 05, 2009, 12:36:29 AM
Jurassic Park is dead as shit.We'll just get another fcking remake than a sequel.Or a prequel or something.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: wolfboy22 on Oct 05, 2009, 06:18:14 PM
Quote from: genocyber on Oct 05, 2009, 12:36:29 AM
Jurassic Park is dead as shit.We'll just get another fcking remake than a sequel.Or a prequel or something.

Which means it's not dead. ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on Oct 05, 2009, 08:40:10 PM
The franchise should stay dead.. I would love to see a sequel, but what I mean.. there isn't much to add to the JP "mythology".. We know much more about dinosaurs then we knew back in '93. Raptors had feathers, btw.  ;D 

I don't want to see stuff like almost human-level intelligent raptors and definitively NO raptors with weapons.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: This Old Hive on Oct 05, 2009, 09:18:21 PM
If they make a Jurassic Park 4 they should just use the basic plot of the second novel and some of its unused ideas. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 05, 2009, 10:32:56 PM
Why? It would just be another TLW in that case.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Oct 05, 2009, 10:58:27 PM
JP could go in any number of directions.  Not all of them good, of course, but to suggest the series is dead is fairly laughable.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Oct 05, 2009, 11:18:13 PM
It's merely... hibernating.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: This Old Hive on Oct 05, 2009, 11:24:06 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 05, 2009, 10:32:56 PM
Why? It would just be another TLW in that case.

Not really the movie only took the basics of the books plot as in people go to island, kid(s) sneak along for the ride, badguys try to steal dinosaurs(eggs in the book), goodguys/badguys get chased/eaten by dinosaurs, main badguy gets eaten by T. Rex while the goodguys escape from the island.

I'd say that the novel is different enough to be its own movie with some minor changes like character names.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Oct 05, 2009, 11:38:51 PM
I remember liking the film more than the book.  And the film wasn't that great.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Pvt. Hicks on Oct 06, 2009, 12:34:58 AM
Quote from: Puks on Oct 05, 2009, 08:40:10 PM
The franchise should stay dead.. I would love to see a sequel, but what I mean.. there isn't much to add to the JP "mythology".. We know much more about dinosaurs then we knew back in '93. Raptors had feathers, btw.  ;D 

I don't want to see stuff like almost human-level intelligent raptors and definitively NO raptors with weapons.

Make up your mind.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Yautja117 on Oct 06, 2009, 01:14:03 AM
As much as I loved JP as a kid, I have since read the novel. I'd like to see someone of talent remake the original to be more like the book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: dragon x on Oct 06, 2009, 05:03:25 AM
i hope it is better than the others
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hybrid PM on Nov 07, 2009, 07:10:32 AM
Looks like theres a stroy for number 4 floating around somewhere.

http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=60710 (http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=60710)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Nov 07, 2009, 01:34:33 PM
I'd be quite happy with Johnston returning, I was happy with JP3. The only thing that movies' lacking in is story.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hybrid PM on Nov 07, 2009, 05:38:11 PM
Yea, I thought Joe did a very good job directing , but the story was poorly written.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Nov 07, 2009, 06:31:24 PM
JPIII should have been better if they had a better story, other then that he did a good job on directing it. Give him a good screenplay and we should have a good sequel since the second movie IMO. It's better then having no JP movie at all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xan21 on Nov 07, 2009, 07:22:59 PM
I was dissapointed with TLW but still enjoy it when it's on tv, I just expected a whole different movie. JP III had some nice action moments but overall was pretty bad.

I made some JPIV sketches some time ago:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.xan-art.com%2FJSite%2Fimages%2FartworkCETGQX%2FIMG_3132%2520copy.gif&hash=dc51fe5e031751e0be295d6ded698467e01d6f8c)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.xan-art.com%2FJSite%2Fimages%2FartworkCETGQX%2FIMG_3123%2520copy.gif&hash=7b724b1ee1f10570f75d8638fa44d35694bb8edf)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.xan-art.com%2FJSite%2Fimages%2FartworkCETGQX%2FIMG_3128%2520copy.gif&hash=a22e92903b5e091fffd1151d1325b1533026eda5)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.xan-art.com%2FJSite%2Fimages%2FartworkCETGQX%2FIMG_3127%2520copy.gif&hash=6df2b3ae87b0a350ad3c8c9b711e32fbb0a410a4)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.xan-art.com%2FJSite%2Fimages%2FartworkCETGQX%2FIMG_3126%2520copy.gif&hash=2823ab02ab86b5e65696fb5c156776df4d5b1bef)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.xan-art.com%2FJSite%2Fimages%2FartworkZYFOFQ%2FIMG_3134%2520copy.gif&hash=1a7cc31acf10261e21770707b8cb57e1235c01db)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.xan-art.com%2FJSite%2Fimages%2FartworkZYFOFQ%2FIMG_3138%2520copy.gif&hash=0446cd803cca72184371de938824de5eac3b2842)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.xan-art.com%2FJSite%2Fimages%2FartworkZYFOFQ%2FIMG_3141%2520copy.gif&hash=15781ef5a4931c2cc09258db79dc20930d01095b)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Nov 07, 2009, 09:23:30 PM
I can't decide. On the one hand, Jurassic Park is one of my favourite movies (I don't remember a time when I haven't seen it), and I would love to see another one. But on the other hand, the third one was horrible, and I would hate to see another movie drag this series down even deeper.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 07, 2009, 10:12:43 PM
Quote from: Hybrid PM on Nov 07, 2009, 07:10:32 AM
Looks like theres a stroy for number 4 floating around somewhere.

http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=60710 (http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=60710)

If he means "dino soldiers" by great story, I say he's apeshit crazy. And I don't want him returning b/c JP 3 sucked.

And Xan21, your sketches are awesome 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 07, 2009, 10:35:17 PM
first off, great sketches! i did a very similar sketch of that pic with the bus.

and second, THANK GOD FOR THE NEW POSITIVE NEWS!!!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Nov 07, 2009, 11:20:13 PM
And what news would that be?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The One and Only on Nov 08, 2009, 05:29:29 AM
The following link contains some sketches of the opponent Godzilla was to fight in the Jan De Bont directed, and Ted Eliiot/Terry Rossio  scripted GODZILLA flick. http://www.kaijuphile.com/forums/showthread.php?t=20142 (http://www.kaijuphile.com/forums/showthread.php?t=20142) Scroll on down and you'll see three sketches of the new take Spielberg and company were considering. Realized in part to artist Carlos Haunte.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Nov 08, 2009, 05:43:28 AM
Those could have been interesting to see in another film, but I would like JP4 to keep the somewhat more realistic dinosaurs.

So not crossbreed between the Hulk and a Triceratops please.  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: cab12394 on Nov 08, 2009, 03:04:50 PM
Quote from: The One and Only on Nov 08, 2009, 05:29:29 AM
The following link contains some sketches of the opponent Godzilla was to fight in the Jan De Bont directed, and Ted Eliiot/Terry Rossio  scripted GODZILLA flick. http://www.kaijuphile.com/forums/showthread.php?t=20142 (http://www.kaijuphile.com/forums/showthread.php?t=20142) Scroll on down and you'll see three sketches of the new take Spielberg and company were considering. Realized in part to artist Carlos Haunte.

Those are um..................different.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SoraSnake92 on Nov 08, 2009, 07:33:01 PM
Xan21, I just love your sketches  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 11, 2009, 11:22:30 AM
Heres my screenplay for the fourth chapter. I hope you enjoy it as much as I enjoyed writing it....

http://www.fileden.com/files/2007/7/10/1255595/Jurassic%20Park%204%20Screenplay.pdf
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Dec 03, 2009, 12:38:55 AM
Quote from: Predboy on Apr 23, 2007, 01:14:53 PM
I would like to see t.rex back in jurassic park 4. When I saw t.rex get killed so easy I got pissed.  >:( If that was real life the t.rex would've won hands down. How can this be you may ask, well lets start with when the t.rex got the first bite on the spino. We all know that t.rex had bonecrushing jaws so he would have just snapped spinos head right off because of the powerful jaws it has. Also I read somewhere that t.rex was more powerful than spino so that would have worked to its advantages. Also even though t.rex would most likely win if its was one on one, scientists are saying t.rex hunted in packs so yeah, one spino against 6 t.rexs, not a good sign for old spiny.

So its settled, T.rex rules, spino drules.  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D
Spinosaurus > T-Rex
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 03, 2009, 01:42:07 AM
Quote from: Predboy on Apr 23, 2007, 01:14:53 PM
I would like to see t.rex back in jurassic park 4. When I saw t.rex get killed so easy I got pissed.  >:( If that was real life the t.rex would've won hands down. How can this be you may ask, well lets start with when the t.rex got the first bite on the spino. We all know that t.rex had bonecrushing jaws so he would have just snapped spinos head right off because of the powerful jaws it has. Also I read somewhere that t.rex was more powerful than spino so that would have worked to its advantages. Also even though t.rex would most likely win if its was one on one, scientists are saying t.rex hunted in packs so yeah, one spino against 6 t.rexs, not a good sign for old spiny.

So its settled, T.rex rules, spino drules.  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D

Where did you read that T.Rex hunted in packs?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hybrid PM on Dec 03, 2009, 01:44:44 AM
Dude T-Rex did NOT hunt in packs, Raptors did. The most you would have is a mother T-Rex and her babies, thats about it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 03, 2009, 01:54:29 AM
T.Rex in pairs, I can believe. But packs weren't necessary given the prey around at the time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Dec 03, 2009, 02:10:10 AM
QuoteThe most you would have is a mother T-Rex and her babies, thats about it.
[

Unless of course you trust a Jurassic Park film as a source for a future Jurassic Park film which has two parents hunting.

Either way, there's so much fiction in the films anyway, they could do what they like if it suited the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hybrid PM on Dec 03, 2009, 02:35:00 AM
No doubt, it makes for a more interesting film. Take Dilophosaurus. It never had frill or spit venom. Just added to highten the cinematic expirience and Raptors were smart, but hell they weren't that smart. They realistically had the smarts of a modern day eagle or bird of prey.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: PLEXI on Dec 03, 2009, 04:07:27 PM
Excellent sketches! :D

QuoteSpinosaurus > T-Rex
The only real advantage Spino has over Rex is the larger size, and longer forearms. Rex has a higher chance of winning in a straight up fight. 

Spino does look a lot cooler though >_>



Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on Dec 03, 2009, 06:42:35 PM
QuoteSpinosaurus > T-Rex

No way. Spinosaurus was PISCIVOROUS. It's jaws weren't suited to prey on other dinos, but to catch fish. It wouldn't stand a chance against a Tyrannosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Dec 03, 2009, 08:22:39 PM
Well I'm guessing most dinosaurs didn't mess with Spinosaurus because of his threatning look and size.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on Dec 03, 2009, 08:43:40 PM
Spinosaurs could get killed by either the T-Rex sized allosaurid Carcharodontosaurus or by Sarcosuchus, a 12 meter long croc. A rather dangerous environment, I dare say.  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Dec 03, 2009, 08:58:37 PM
I don't think Spinosaurus and Carcharodontosaurus would fight to the death against eachother. Just chase eachother out of their territory and Sarcosuchus mostly preyed on the herbivores drinking from the river. I'm not anti- T-Rex I just like Spinosaurus more.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on Dec 03, 2009, 09:15:13 PM
It's not about which dinosaur you like, just plain science. Carcharo and Spino inhabited different ecological niches, so a fight would be improbable, but not impossible.

Though I'm pretty sure the super-croc and Spino had some nasty arguments once in a while.

BTW I like Spinosaurus more than T-Rex, too.  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Dec 03, 2009, 09:25:23 PM
It would be intresting to see interaction between Sarcosuchus and Spinosaurus or another large carnivore in a documentary or something. I have always been curious to see what would happen in a confrontion between the two.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Dec 03, 2009, 09:36:02 PM
you know what got into my head after district 9? how the world reacts to jurassic park? would people want it to be re-open? get rid of it? would people be afraid or intriged by the islands? in JP3 we saw illegal tours in boat, what if someone tries to steal the dinosaurs? there, some passable script material.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Dec 03, 2009, 09:46:48 PM
I've always thought the fourth movie should revolve around dinosaurs finding their way to the mainland and causing havok, eventually ending with the creatures being destroyed and both islands being nuked. Problem with that though, it just wouldn't 'feel' like a JP movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on Dec 03, 2009, 10:04:41 PM
Dude, nuking dinos sounds very silly to me. They're just animals, not killing machines. Heck, the vast majority wouldn't and/or couldn't hurt a human being.

A few island raptors aren't really that much of a threat. I don't like when they're perceived as monsters. This was one of the things that made JP so great.. dinosaurs weren't depicted as B-movie monsters (like in the older movies), but actual animals.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Dec 03, 2009, 10:09:26 PM
Wasn't Isla Nublar nuked in the first novel?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on Dec 03, 2009, 10:11:45 PM
Haven't read.

I prefer actual paleontology books.  ;)

But now that you mention it I feel a bit ashamed as a JP fan.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Elliott on Dec 03, 2009, 10:15:41 PM
Quote from: War Wager on Dec 03, 2009, 10:09:26 PM
Wasn't Isla Nublar nuked in the first novel?
Yes. And Dr. Ian Malcolm died. But in the second novel, he returns...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: PLEXI on Dec 03, 2009, 10:26:52 PM
QuoteYes. And Dr. Ian Malcolm died. But in the second novel, he returns...
Chaos Theory
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Elliott on Dec 03, 2009, 10:59:08 PM
Or the Red Queen theory, and Gambler's Ruin.  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Dec 03, 2009, 11:07:31 PM
Quote from: Galliruler on Dec 03, 2009, 10:15:41 PM
Quote from: War Wager on Dec 03, 2009, 10:09:26 PM
Wasn't Isla Nublar nuked in the first novel?
Yes. And Dr. Ian Malcolm died. But in the second novel, he returns...

No it wasn't nuked just destroyed and the animals killed. Malcolm was rumoured to be dead so much so that he was filed as deceased but actually survived the incident.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Pvt. Hicks on Dec 03, 2009, 11:42:01 PM
Whatever. The first movie stands on its own.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Elliott on Dec 03, 2009, 11:59:57 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Dec 03, 2009, 11:07:31 PM
Quote from: Galliruler on Dec 03, 2009, 10:15:41 PM
Quote from: War Wager on Dec 03, 2009, 10:09:26 PM
Wasn't Isla Nublar nuked in the first novel?
Yes. And Dr. Ian Malcolm died. But in the second novel, he returns...

No it wasn't nuked just destroyed and the animals killed. Malcolm was rumoured to be dead so much so that he was filed as deceased but actually survived the incident.
In the book it was nuked. The poor Hypsolophidons were nuked. :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on Dec 04, 2009, 12:12:10 AM
It's Hypsilophodon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alienseseses on Dec 04, 2009, 12:13:43 AM
No, it's Hapsakalakalakalakadon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Dec 04, 2009, 12:28:02 AM
Why is the dilophosaurus so undersized in the first movie?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hybrid PM on Dec 04, 2009, 12:44:00 AM
Because Speilberg didn't want the general audience to confuse Diphoposaurus with the Raptor. So he made it smaller and gave it a frill and the ability to spit venom. The raptors are actually Deinonychus. Velociraptors are smaller.  
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Dec 04, 2009, 12:51:29 AM
Oh. They could of made it it's actual 8 foot tall size and the audience probably wouldn't have gotten confused with the velociraptors.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SiL on Dec 04, 2009, 01:09:42 AM
Quote from: Hybrid PM on Dec 04, 2009, 12:44:00 AM
The raptors are actually Dinonicus.
Yet they're closer to Utahraptors in height ... although Utahraptors are thought to be even bigger still. Deinonychus only had a hip height of less than a meter.

Ultimately they're not really any kind of dromaeosauridae - Speilberg didn't like the real raptor's size and so jacked it up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Dec 04, 2009, 02:17:05 AM
Quote from: Galliruler on Dec 03, 2009, 11:59:57 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Dec 03, 2009, 11:07:31 PM
Quote from: Galliruler on Dec 03, 2009, 10:15:41 PM
Quote from: War Wager on Dec 03, 2009, 10:09:26 PM
Wasn't Isla Nublar nuked in the first novel?
Yes. And Dr. Ian Malcolm died. But in the second novel, he returns...

No it wasn't nuked just destroyed and the animals killed. Malcolm was rumoured to be dead so much so that he was filed as deceased but actually survived the incident.
In the book it was nuked. The poor Hypsolophidons were nuked. :(

It wasn't nuked. I don't think Costa Rica even has nukes. They firebombed the island, destroying the vast majority of the flora and fauna that inhabited it, as well as the InGen facilities. Believe me, I know. I've read that baby twice. Crichton's best work, in my opinion. I think it was better than the film, personally.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2009, 02:52:12 AM
Quote from: SiL on Dec 04, 2009, 01:09:42 AM
Quote from: Hybrid PM on Dec 04, 2009, 12:44:00 AM
The raptors are actually Dinonicus.
Yet they're closer to Utahraptors in height ... although Utahraptors are thought to be even bigger still. Deinonychus only had a hip height of less than a meter.

Ultimately they're not really any kind of dromaeosauridae - Speilberg didn't like the real raptor's size and so jacked it up.

Indeed. Not to mention, he used the name Velociraptor because it's more exotic than Deinonychus.

Velociraptor--> swift thief
Deinonychus--> terrible claw
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xhan on Dec 04, 2009, 03:02:53 AM
umm Utah Raptors were 9-12 feet HIGH, not 9-12 long. If there was a Utah Raptor in the movie it would have eaten the T-Rex.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/72/Utahraptor_size_estimate_chart.svg

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2F8%2F82%2FDeinonychus-scale.png&hash=d80880962c4528ec835a61157776c37eec1b2c73)

Nychus is what the JP monsters were based on as opposed to turkey sized Velociraptors.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SiL on Dec 04, 2009, 03:05:05 AM
Quote from: Xhan on Dec 04, 2009, 03:02:53 AM
umm Utah Raptors were 9-12 feet HIGH, not 9-12 long. If there was a Utah Raptor in the movie it would have eaten the T-Rex.
"Even bigger still" kind of covered that.

QuoteNychus is what the JP monsters were based on as opossed ot  turkey sized velociraptors.
Yes. But they're still too big for Deinonychus.

Hence my last sentence - They're not any member of dromaeosauridae.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xhan on Dec 04, 2009, 03:07:17 AM
Kind of like a Great White is kind of larger than a minnow?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2009, 03:09:16 AM
You're arguing semantics.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SiL on Dec 04, 2009, 03:11:40 AM
Quote from: Xhan on Dec 04, 2009, 03:07:17 AM
Kind of like a Great White is kind of larger than a minnow?
Sure.

Although Wikipedia (yes, yes I know...) lists them as "up to" six and a half feet, not 9-12 (Although if you've got sources for that size, go ahead and post - I'd love to educate myself some more on them).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2009, 03:17:55 AM
Wikipedia is pretty accurate in that regard. But if want a scholarly source, hold on.

Source: Dinosaurus: The Complete Guide to Dinosaurs by Steve Parker.

Utahraptor fact file
Length: 5-6 metres (16-20 feet)
Weight: 500 kgs (1100 lbs)

"[Utahraptor] shot to fame in 1993 after Jurassic Park, in which the clever, co-operative dinosaurs of the film were based on smaller dromaeosaurs, such as Velociraptor and Deinonychus but to make them a match for human adversaries, they were enlarged to slightly more than the height of an adult person and to several metres in length. During the film's production in 1991, fossil remains of just such a rapto were uncovered in eastern Utah, giving a factual basis for the film's fearsome monsters."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xhan on Dec 04, 2009, 03:18:28 AM
How bout Raptor Red?

QuoteWikipedia is pretty accurate in that regard. But if want a scholarly source, hold on

Except their own size chart doesn't match the description.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/72/Utahraptor_size_estimate_chart.svg
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SiL on Dec 04, 2009, 03:21:07 AM
Quote from: Xhan on Dec 04, 2009, 03:18:28 AM
How bout Raptor Red?
Read it. Walking With Dinosaurs lists "up to 2 meters" as well.

QuoteExcept their own size chart doesn't match the description.
This one does:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4a/Utahraptor_scale.png
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xhan on Dec 04, 2009, 03:30:36 AM
Sure, if their neck doesn't bend up. Hazarding a wild guess it does.

If you've read Bakker's book then you know it's pretty moot. Red is able to chaw things higher than 2 meters up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2009, 03:34:44 AM
I don't think so. At least not by much. While Utahraptor is classified as a dromaeosaurid, its size makes it more comparable to carnosaurs. That said, Utahraptor walked perfectly balanced on two legs with its tail held out for balance. Most depictions of large, meat-eating dinosaurs have them more or less rigid with their head movement, and they don't curve up much. I'm not saying the head doesn't do that, but I don't think it was common place.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SiL on Dec 04, 2009, 03:36:05 AM
Quote from: Xhan on Dec 04, 2009, 03:30:36 AM
If you've read Bakker's book then you know it's pretty moot. Red is able to chaw things higher than 2 meters up.
I'm able to grab things eight feet up, doesn't mean I'm eight feet tall.

I still don't even get what the point of all this is, though. I said Utahraptors were bigger than what we saw in JP, and then you come in saying ... the Utahraptors are bigger than what we saw in JP. And then this happened.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xhan on Dec 04, 2009, 03:41:39 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2009, 03:34:44 AM
I don't think so. At least not by much. While Utahraptor is classified as a dromaeosaurid, its size makes it more comparable to carnosaurs. That said, Utahraptor walked perfectly balanced on two legs with its tail held out for balance. Most depictions of large, meat-eating dinosaurs have them more or less rigid with their head movement, and they don't curve up much. I'm not saying the head doesn't do that, but I don't think it was common place.

T-Rex had plenty range of motion, and needed it, as the head is pretty much the go to organ for all things interactive, short of stomping something.

QuoteI still don't even get what the point of all this is

Lol, you're the guy that responded. My point was that nothing CLOSE to Utah Raptor was available, no more, no less.

Quote
I'm able to grab things eight feet up, doesn't mean I'm eight feet tall.

And Utah Raptor is able to crane it's neck to that height, hence the statement. You tilting your head back would make you shorter.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2009, 03:43:05 AM
Quote from: Xhan on Dec 04, 2009, 03:41:39 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2009, 03:34:44 AM
I don't think so. At least not by much. While Utahraptor is classified as a dromaeosaurid, its size makes it more comparable to carnosaurs. That said, Utahraptor walked perfectly balanced on two legs with its tail held out for balance. Most depictions of large, meat-eating dinosaurs have them more or less rigid with their head movement, and they don't curve up much. I'm not saying the head doesn't do that, but I don't think it was common place.

T-Rex had plenty range of motion, and needed it, as the head is pretty much the go to organ for all things interactive, short of stomping something.


Remember: T. Rex had stereoscopic vision. No other large meat-eating dinosaur had that. Even the bigger ones (Giganotosaurus, Carcharodontosaurus, Spinosaurus) didn't have that. That helped a great deal, since it had depth perception.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SiL on Dec 04, 2009, 03:44:06 AM
Quote from: Xhan on Dec 04, 2009, 03:41:39 AM
Lol, you're the guy that responded.
Because you responded to something I said.

QuoteMy point was that nothing CLOSE to Utah Raptor was available, no more, no less.
You then listed a 9-12 foot height for the creature, which all readily available information would say is objectively false.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xhan on Dec 04, 2009, 03:50:15 AM
Yeah, because the median height is measured from the shoulder, not the head... except the animal can raise its neck and probably did all the time to see/hunt. So going back to the model and looking at the neck and head gives you an actual height.

Quote
Remember: T. Rex had stereoscopic vision. No other large meat-eating dinosaur had that. Even the bigger ones (Giganotosaurus, Carcharodontosaurus, Spinosaurus) didn't have that. That helped a great deal, since it had depth perception.

And it still had the means to crane back or chomp something at face level, which is borne out by other TRex's having chaw marks on the front sides of their heads and tall Hadrosaurs being clomped on the head.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SiL on Dec 04, 2009, 03:54:36 AM
Quote from: Xhan on Dec 04, 2009, 03:50:15 AM
Yeah, because the median height is measured from the shoulder, not the head... except the animal can raise its neck and probably did all the time to see/hunt. So going back ot he model and looking at the neck and head gives you an actual height.
But like I said - Just because I can stand on the tips of my toes and stretch out my arms doesn't mean I'm eight feet tall. There's a reason they go by median shoulder height rather than measuring the highest the animal could possibly stretch and saying that's the "actual" height. It's like measuring how high it is crouched and saying that's the thing's height.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xhan on Dec 04, 2009, 04:01:24 AM
Which is again, not remotely accurate to MODALITY of the animal, as all the scratch marks on the bones of plant eaters attest. If the animal was unable to raise its head, there would be no point (or basis) in jumping on the sides of large plant eaters with your head raised up. Which they did, as they've been found smashed in that exact position, much less standing up to properly employ the sickle claw forward. Ergo, 9-12 feet TALL. The end. That was my point.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SiL on Dec 04, 2009, 04:05:18 AM
The raptor rearing up on the table in JP while everyone's in the vents would've been about nine feet tall. So I guess they're the right size after all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2009, 04:12:11 AM
Xhan, being able to reach up to 9 feet doesn't mean the creature is 9 feet tall. The reason why it's measured from the shoulder and not the hed is because like I said, that posture wasn't maintained on a regular basis. For maximum balance, the animal would have been straight out from end to end.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xhan on Dec 04, 2009, 04:28:18 AM
Quotethat posture wasn't maintained on a regular basis.

That we don't know. Looking at Predatory cats would say yes they did on a regular consistent basis, particularly when fighting or attacking or simply checking shit out. Running? probably not.

QuoteXhan, being able to reach up to 9 feet doesn't mean the creature is 9 feet tall.

Actually in this case it does, as the arms aren't doing the biting. If it was a shark, sure.

Relating it to JP, there's only a couple of scenes where their necks are dead level.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SiL on Dec 04, 2009, 04:32:04 AM
I'd bring up Walking With Dinosaurs' portrayal of the Utahraptors, but I've no idea how well that'd go down. They seemed to keep themselves pretty steady.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2009, 04:37:13 AM
Quote from: Xhan on Dec 04, 2009, 04:28:18 AM
Quotethat posture wasn't maintained on a regular basis.

That we don't know. Looking at Predatory cats would say yes they did on a regular consistent basis, particularly when fighting or attacking or simply checking shit out. Running? probably not.

I'd say a better way of looking at it would be modern day birds since they evolved from small carnivorous dinosaurs, but the bone structure of any large, bipedal bird dictates its head be kept up at all times, so I can't debate here.

Quote from: Xhan on Dec 04, 2009, 04:28:18 AM

Actually in this case it does, as the arms aren't doing the biting. If it was a shark, sure.

Relating it to JP, there's only a couple of scenes where their necks are dead level.

I don't understand. Are you saying because the arms can reach, that makes it higher? Coz I'm pretty sure you and SiL just argued that to a standstill.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SiL on Dec 04, 2009, 04:43:09 AM
The point is that the head can reach, so it makes it higher.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2009, 04:45:47 AM
And I say that's silly. Like you already said, lifting your head up doesn't make you taller.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xhan on Dec 04, 2009, 04:48:54 AM
It's not silly, especially with can and would.

Quotehead up doesn't make you taller.

for a dinosaur in that configuration that's exactly what it does.

Quotemodern day birds

Emu/Ostrich COUGH. :p

QuoteWalking

Yeah, but there in Jurassic Fight Club (salt grain added here), they raise up to attack and they literally HAVE to in order to jump with sickles out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SiL on Dec 04, 2009, 04:55:02 AM
And I literally have to squat to jump, doesn't make me shorter :P

Height's measured from rest. Otherwise there are too many variables and any one person has a half a dozen different measurements.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2009, 04:55:30 AM
Quote from: Xhan on Dec 04, 2009, 04:48:54 AM
Emu/Ostrich COUGH. :p

Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2009, 04:37:13 AM
I'd say a better way of looking at it would be modern day birds since they evolved from small carnivorous dinosaurs, but the bone structure of any large, bipedal bird dictates its head be kept up at all times, so I can't debate here.

*cough*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xhan on Dec 04, 2009, 04:59:10 AM
hence the :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hybrid PM on Jan 14, 2010, 06:49:33 AM
Joe Johnston on JP4!

"Well, there is going to be a Jurassic Park IV. And it's going to be unlike anything you've seen. It breaks away from the first three—it's essentially the beginning of the second Jurassic Park trilogy. It's going to be done in a completely different way. That's pretty much all I can tell you."


http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=62386 (http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=62386)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jan 14, 2010, 06:51:25 AM
With the visuals from Avatar, I think JP4 will be just as ground breaking as the first maybe IMO.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2010, 07:20:14 AM
Quote from: Hybrid PM on Jan 14, 2010, 06:49:33 AM
Joe Johnston on JP4!

"Well, there is going to be a Jurassic Park IV. And it's going to be unlike anything you've seen. It breaks away from the first three—it's essentially the beginning of the second Jurassic Park trilogy. It's going to be done in a completely different way. That's pretty much all I can tell you."


http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=62386 (http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=62386)

Ya, coming from the guy who directed JP 3, I'm not holding my breath.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: RidgeTop on Jan 14, 2010, 07:45:14 AM
Quote from: Hybrid PM on Jan 14, 2010, 06:49:33 AM
Joe Johnston on JP4!

"Well, there is going to be a Jurassic Park IV. And it's going to be unlike anything you've seen. It breaks away from the first three—it's essentially the beginning of the second Jurassic Park trilogy. It's going to be done in a completely different way. That's pretty much all I can tell you."


http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=62386 (http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=62386)

And how long have they said Jurassic Park IV is coming now? 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Undeadite on Jan 14, 2010, 09:07:58 AM
Long enough for my inner child to die of old age.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Jan 14, 2010, 12:03:46 PM
I hope we get to see a movie with the visual quality of avatar and the good script of jurassic park.

then, again, jurassic park 3 didnt had the best story ever. and the only way to make these dinosaurs look real would be to clone them and stick weird stuff to them...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2010, 03:43:18 PM
Stick weird stuff to them?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Jan 14, 2010, 03:47:22 PM
ROCKET LAUNCHING SHOULDER PADS AND LAZER BEAMS ON THEIR FOREHEADS!!!1eleven1!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Undeadite on Jan 14, 2010, 04:17:26 PM
That was kind of touched upon with the idea that the dinosaurs were going to be used by the government to carry missiles and weapons to fight terrorism overseas. we're all hoping that idea was scrapped.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ShadowPred on Jan 14, 2010, 04:18:29 PM
I really do hope that that script isn't even being considered.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Undeadite on Jan 14, 2010, 04:21:13 PM
I would like to go one step further and suggest slapping whoever it was that wrote it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ShadowPred on Jan 14, 2010, 04:22:44 PM
For some odd reason I want to read that script, or at least a point by point of what else was in the script.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2010, 04:23:56 PM
I remember Spielberg (yes, that Spielberg) wanted the dino-soldiers. As for the terrorism idea, that might be something else entirely.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ShadowPred on Jan 14, 2010, 04:39:49 PM
That really sounds like pure f**king genius. (no it doesn't)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Jan 14, 2010, 05:31:31 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2010, 03:43:18 PM
Stick weird stuff to them?

you know, sensors n' shit to capturate movements and facial expresions. in a velociraptor: murder face, attack face, hate face, you know, the tiny differences.

the child in me wants to see dinosaurs with huge lazers and missiles. the adult in me wants to see a raptor mutilate the f**k out of a person in camera.

oh wait, thats my inner child too :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2010, 05:54:18 PM
I liked the facial expressions to be honest. It brought the dinosaurs to life.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jan 14, 2010, 06:11:36 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2010, 07:20:14 AM
Ya, coming from the guy who directed JP 3, I'm not holding my breath.

I think Joe Johnston is a pretty decent director, but seeing how most Dino movies such as Land of the Lost bombed, I doubt people care for another Dinosaur movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 14, 2010, 08:16:42 PM
THIS IS AWESOME NEWS!!!!!!!

Is it finally confirmed?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 14, 2010, 08:38:15 PM
JP3 still was decent mindless blockbuster fun with some nice effects. The problem wasn't the direction (which was good) but the script.
Anyway, I hope they pull off JP4 before I die...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on Jan 14, 2010, 08:52:42 PM
Quotefacial expresions

Dinosaurs didn't have facial expressions.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2010, 09:13:38 PM
Quote from: Puks on Jan 14, 2010, 08:52:42 PM
Quotefacial expresions

Dinosaurs didn't have facial expressions.

And you know that based on...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on Jan 14, 2010, 09:16:57 PM
Birds and reptiles of today.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jan 14, 2010, 10:17:53 PM
JP3 will be 10 years old next year, hard to believe it been almost 10 years since we did not had a JP movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2010, 10:23:52 PM
Quote from: Puks on Jan 14, 2010, 09:16:57 PM
Birds and reptiles of today.

Valid, but then again, it's proven that dromaeosaurids can indeed communicate with one another due to their brain structure, so I wouldn't write off facial expressions, at least basic ones.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on Jan 14, 2010, 10:31:58 PM
Quoteit's proven that dromaeosaurids can indeed communicate with one another due to their brain structure

Link or it didn't happen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 15, 2010, 12:33:32 AM
http://www.dinosaurhome.com/utahraptor-research-part-2-social-behavior-intelligence-and-an-example-of-pack-hunting-111.html

Jack Horner also mentioned it briefly in an interview during JP 3 production.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on Jan 15, 2010, 01:05:22 AM
A lot of speculation.

There is no conclusive evidence they lived in packs nor communicated via sound (although they probably did).

The only recent animal species hunting in coordinated groups are some carnivores (lions and canids - note most carnivores are solitary) and they are far more intelligent than your average turkey.. ehm.. raptor.

Either way, what has this to do with facial expressions? Not even carnivores have them, instead they express emotions by body posture. Only higher primates make faces.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 15, 2010, 03:29:06 AM
They would have had to have hunted in packs. There's no other way for them to have hunted and lived because of the prey that was around at that time. Maybe not lived together, but hunted, I highly believe it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SiL on Jan 15, 2010, 07:38:33 AM
Velociraptors weren't up against much prey bigger than them; there's no real reason they couldn't have hunted on their own.

The raptors in the original Jurassic Park snarled - That's about as far as you could really get for facial expression. You'd think someone would've made a note of muscle attachments on the face and said "Hey, they can make faces" by now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on Jan 15, 2010, 11:07:51 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 15, 2010, 03:29:06 AM
They would have had to have hunted in packs. There's no other way for them to have hunted and lived because of the prey that was around at that time. Maybe not lived together, but hunted, I highly believe it.

There was plenty of prey not bigger than your average dromaeosaurid (be it Velociraptor or Utahraptor). Really big dinos, like sauropods, were hunted by larger carnivores - families like Allosauridae, Spinosauridae, Tyrannosauridae, etc. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 15, 2010, 04:33:20 PM
I doubt Tyrannosaurids hunted in packs. Maybe pairs, but if we're talking prey, the largest land animal of the Late Cretaceous would've been Triceratops, or maybe a male hadrosaurid. Such animals would not require pack hunting techniques to bring them down.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on Jan 15, 2010, 05:17:10 PM
Where have I stated tyrannosaurids hunted in packs?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Undeadite on Jan 15, 2010, 06:16:28 PM
Ok, so I'm sitting here reading this... fascinating argument, and all I can do is cry over the fact that I have forgotten almost all dino nomenclature. How come at age 10 I could speak it like a primary language, but now all I can muster is "that big one with the teeth"?  :'( :'( :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Jan 15, 2010, 08:09:53 PM
Quote from: SiL on Jan 15, 2010, 07:38:33 AM
Velociraptors weren't up against much prey bigger than them; there's no real reason they couldn't have hunted on their own.

Lies.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SiL on Jan 15, 2010, 10:10:17 PM
Then post truths!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 15, 2010, 11:31:14 PM
Quote from: Puks on Jan 15, 2010, 05:17:10 PM
Where have I stated tyrannosaurids hunted in packs?

Hm, thought it's what you were implying initially. Oh well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 15, 2010, 11:51:28 PM
Yay Jurassic Park!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Corporal Lewis Hicks on Feb 03, 2010, 01:01:39 PM
This Film Will be good. I hope I love this Franchise I don't want it to fail epically.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Feb 03, 2010, 11:44:17 PM
Jurassic Park III is no way to end this franchise. I really hope that this one is good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Feb 04, 2010, 12:07:32 AM
When Jurassic Park III first came out it wasn't even intended to end the franchise. They were already talking about the fourth one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 04, 2010, 01:02:14 AM
JP III felt like a 1hr and 30min rush job in which it was. I never understood that the Kirby's hire these big bad mercenaries to go on the island, and as soon as they get there, they run away. They knew they were going to be on an island with Dinosaurs!! *shakes head*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Feb 04, 2010, 01:12:44 AM
There's also the fact that tyrannosaurus rex didn't urinate, but that's more or less nitpicking.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alienseseses on Feb 04, 2010, 01:37:24 AM
It didn't piss?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ShadowPred on Feb 04, 2010, 01:38:41 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Feb 04, 2010, 01:02:14 AM
JP III felt like a 1hr and 30min rush job in which it was. I never understood that the Kirby's hire these big bad mercenaries to go on the island, and as soon as they get there, they run away. They knew they were going to be on an island with Dinosaurs!! *shakes head*

I'd do the same.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 04, 2010, 01:39:45 AM
Poor, Cooper...they left without him  :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Feb 04, 2010, 01:48:14 AM
The gunshot in the jungle then the Spinosaurus roar gives me goosebumps.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Vemados on Feb 04, 2010, 03:04:52 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Feb 04, 2010, 01:12:44 AM
There's also the fact that tyrannosaurus rex didn't urinate, but that's more or less nitpicking.

Now I'm curious
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Kimarhi on Feb 04, 2010, 03:10:10 AM
I didn't mind JPIII except for the fact the directors left off the third act for a three act film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Feb 04, 2010, 03:27:15 AM
Figured they overdid it on the second film which never needed all that San Diego garbage, so trimmed the third to make up for it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Kimarhi on Feb 04, 2010, 06:20:36 AM
Indeed.

I actually watch JP3 whenever it comes on.  Short movie perfect for afterwork and stay at home supper.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Feb 04, 2010, 06:48:00 AM
The lack of T-Rex (I know he was in it, but it was such a pathetic cameo), and the new Velociraptor design made me very sadface. I was pretty dissapointing, with the one redeeming thing being the fantastic Spinosaurus design (I just wish he wasn't the main antagonist).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 04, 2010, 06:56:58 AM
Quote from: SM on Feb 04, 2010, 03:27:15 AM
Figured they overdid it on the second film which never needed all that San Diego garbage, so trimmed the third to make up for it.

I don't understand why that sequence is so disliked. I found it entertaining; nice little references to past movies too (T.Rex scratching his ear=Rex doing the same in 1933 Kong).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Feb 04, 2010, 07:35:38 AM
I never understood why The Lost World was so disliked. Seriously, I thought it was amazing (it might even be my favourite).

Even if somebody told me in the clearest detail, right to my face, I would still have a difficult time understanding what was so bad about it.

PS- It was also my favourite of the two novels.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 04, 2010, 02:45:30 PM
Quote from: "The Space Sweeper" on Feb 04, 2010, 07:35:38 AM
I never understood why The Lost World was so disliked. Seriously, I thought it was amazing (it might even be my favourite).

Even if somebody told me in the clearest detail, right to my face, I would still have a difficult time understanding what was so bad about it.

PS- It was also my favourite of the two novels.

I loved the Lost World, I really liked the whole INGEN storming the Island scene. Also Jeff Goldblum was the lead! Jeff is great!

My favorite scene in the movie is the long grass/raptor scene..."Don't go into the long grass!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Feb 04, 2010, 11:28:33 PM
Quote from: Alienseseses on Feb 04, 2010, 01:37:24 AM
It didn't piss?

Pretty sure I read that somewhere, and if you think about it, it makes sense. Birds are probably closely related to therapods, and they don't urinate either.

Quote from: "The Space Sweeper" on Feb 04, 2010, 07:35:38 AM
I never understood why The Lost World was so disliked. Seriously, I thought it was amazing (it might even be my favourite).

Even if somebody told me in the clearest detail, right to my face, I would still have a difficult time understanding what was so bad about it.

PS- It was also my favourite of the two novels.

I never understood the hate either. It used to be my favourite of the two (I've recently matured a little, which sent Jurassic Park back to #1). It was entertaining, and still had iconic scenes with good acting and CGI. However, the book was my least favourite of Crichton's work, with the exception of State of Fear.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Feb 05, 2010, 01:06:25 AM
Lost World starts with a great premise (in spite of the "Oh!  Another island with dinosaurs!  How convenient!" thing), and cracks along really well until the van falls off the cliff.  That sequence is never topped for the rest of the film.

After that things get a bit silly.  And I'm not even talking about Malcolm's daughter doing the gymnastics thing.  More like Roland telling the InGen guy not to set up on a game trail - then tells everyone to sleep in a creek bed - because of course dinosaurs don't need to drink.  And Peter Stormare wandering off was dopey too.  The long grass scene was decent, but once the Venture got to San Diego and Spielberg got to do his King Kong homage - it was just self indulgent and went into the realms of fantasy.  Plus you lost two of the best characters in Vince Vaughn and Pete Postlethwaite.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 05, 2010, 01:33:32 AM
Quote from: SM on Feb 05, 2010, 01:06:25 AMMore like Roland telling the InGen guy not to set up on a game trail - then tells everyone to sleep in a creek bed - because of course dinosaurs don't need to drink.

Point taken, but considering they'd been hiking all day long, I doubt the potential implications of where they were sleeping even crossed their minds since they were so tired.

Quote from: SM on Feb 05, 2010, 01:06:25 AMAnd Peter Stormare wandering off was dopey too.

Why? Anyone could have gotten lost.

Quote from: SM on Feb 05, 2010, 01:06:25 AMThe long grass scene was decent, but once the Venture got to San Diego and Spielberg got to do his King Kong homage - it was just self indulgent and went into the realms of fantasy

Not entirely, because I think that unless someone had seen King Kong and really known about those little references, you wouldn't notice them. I love the original KK and even I didn't realize what they were until I read about them.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Feb 05, 2010, 01:40:59 AM
Quote from: "The Space Sweeper" on Feb 04, 2010, 07:35:38 AM
I never understood why The Lost World was so disliked. Seriously, I thought it was amazing (it might even be my favourite).

Even if somebody told me in the clearest detail, right to my face, I would still have a difficult time understanding what was so bad about it.

PS- It was also my favourite of the two novels.

While I loved the movie I still think the book was much better. It's been years since I read it though, so I should probably pick it up again to refresh my memory. :)

BTW, did the T-Rex make it to San Diego in the book? Because that was one part I never really liked about the movie. :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Feb 05, 2010, 01:46:56 AM
T-Rex was never in San Diego in the book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Feb 05, 2010, 01:51:38 AM
QuotePoint taken, but considering they'd been hiking all day long, I doubt the potential implications of where they were sleeping even crossed their minds since they were so tired.

Weak.  Roland was in charge and went to great lengths earlier about game trails.  It made him look dumb.

QuoteWhy? Anyone could have gotten lost.

It was just - I dunno... dopey.  For a start you have a drunken thug - why?  Why does Roland even want him there?  Then you have Carter (I think?) who's just listening to his walkman.  Despite the poetic justice involved it was overall a dumb sequence.

QuoteNot entirely, because I think that unless someone had seen King Kong and really known about those little references, you wouldn't notice them.

King Kong was and is an enormously popular movie.  I'm sure a lot of people would've picked up on the references.  And that's not even really a problem as such.  The whole thing about the Rex being locked up but everyone on the ship dead, really, really pushed credibility - and then it got worse with the Rex stomping around the city.

I've always though the film should've ended on a cliffhanger when Malcolm et al depart and see the Rex captured.  That way Roland and Vince Vaughn could've been brought back for the third flick.  The final act of JP2 looked and felt like an entirely different film anyway.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Kimarhi on Feb 05, 2010, 03:35:26 AM
I didn't dislike JP2, but the Lost World novel was way better and I wished it would have been more like it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 05, 2010, 04:35:34 AM
Quote from: SM on Feb 05, 2010, 01:51:38 AM
It was just - I dunno... dopey.  For a start you have a drunken thug - why?  Why does Roland even want him there?  Then you have Carter (I think?) who's just listening to his walkman.  Despite the poetic justice involved it was overall a dumb sequence.

Was he drunk? I don't recall seeing him drink. And yes, his sidekick's name was Carter.

QuoteNot entirely, because I think that unless someone had seen King Kong and really known about those little references, you wouldn't notice them.

Quote from: SM on Feb 05, 2010, 01:51:38 AMThe whole thing about the Rex being locked up but everyone on the ship dead, really, really pushed credibility - and then it got worse with the Rex stomping around the city.

Have to agree there. I cannot understand how the hell it even happened. How the f**k does a dinosaur in a cargo hold eat the crew on the bridge?

Quote from: SM on Feb 05, 2010, 01:51:38 AMI've always though the film should've ended on a cliffhanger when Malcolm et al depart and see the Rex captured.  That way Roland and Vince Vaughn could've been brought back for the third flick.  The final act of JP2 looked and felt like an entirely different film anyway.

What sort of cliffhanger? Malcolm and Harding saw the Rex leave.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Feb 05, 2010, 04:54:26 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 05, 2010, 04:35:34 AMHave to agree there. I cannot understand how the hell it even happened. How the f**k does a dinosaur in a cargo hold eat the crew on the bridge?

If I remember correctly they intended to film a scene where a pack of Velociraptors snuck onboard and killed the crew.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 05, 2010, 01:47:11 PM
Yep, Shasvre is correct.

Originally, Spielberg wanted Raptors on the boat, hence the severed arm on wheel, and the other bodies. But they changed it at the last second.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hybrid PM on Feb 05, 2010, 05:17:29 PM
I beleive the original ending of The Lost World as it was written in the screenplay was more reminiscent the ending of the first movie.

It was supposed to be Ian, Sarah and the girl trapped by the raptors outside the shed. The raptors are about to pounce on them like the end of the first movie until a group of Pteronadons swoop in and save the day. A ratpor/Pteronadon fight ensues allowing the group to escape.... END MOVIE.  But Spielberg's ego got in the way.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Deus Ex Machina on Feb 05, 2010, 05:27:35 PM

QuoteWeak.  Roland was in charge and went to great lengths earlier about game trails.  It made him look dumb.

At that point, they were no longer on the game trail. There was no real interaction with dinosaurs, not to say that they weren't there. The whole point about where they were sleeping and the T-Rex interaction was the scent. They weren't hunting for food, they were "defending territory" that previously was not their's due to the intrusion of Sarah and Nick taking the baby Rex. They followed the scent due to parental instinct feeling these animals (being those two people) were a threat, hence why when they saw everyone sleeping they didn't decide to om nom nom everything. Once the reaction was met, they then lashed out and started trying to A.) Kill them or B.) Successfully ward them off.

Roland wasn't dumb, he just didn't buy into the discussion between Sarah and Dr. Burke (The paleo guy with the cowboy hat) about the Rex's instincts and habits. They had a nice little debate about if the Rex's would come back or not. Roland didn't really care for it other than to get a T-Rex male trophy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: InfestedGoat on Feb 05, 2010, 05:51:40 PM
Quote from: Dekapitator on Mar 26, 2007, 08:52:38 PM
Quote from: >>Predalien Warrior<< on Mar 25, 2007, 10:10:16 PM
I'd like to see a big angry group of thoses spitters from the first movie (forgot their name) be the main meat-eaters in IV...

That dino's called Dilophosaurus. Dilophosaurs where around 20ft in lenght and weighed half a ton. (It's size was greatly reduced in the film.)
This time I'd like to see a full-sized one, some great raptor action (Raptors rule!), and the T-Rex as the "big boss".

That always bothered me as a kid (I use a huge dinosaur nerd), also the Velociraptor was HUGE! What they were showing was more like a dinonicus raptor.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 05, 2010, 06:09:06 PM
That's Deinonychus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: InfestedGoat on Feb 05, 2010, 08:36:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 05, 2010, 06:09:06 PM
That's Deinonychus.

Thank you, I even googled it to make sure I spelled it right! But i copied and pasted what I typed in /facepalm.

This is what I get for being awake for *looks at time* 38 hours -.-
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Feb 09, 2010, 03:15:32 AM
http://www.joblo.com/arrow/index.php?id=20606
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 09, 2010, 03:26:58 AM
Interesting. I'll be looking forward tohear which dinosaurs they bring in.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Feb 09, 2010, 06:42:44 AM
I hope they bring back the JP feel to it, and give us something new with the series. I don't see the movie coming out until 2012 or 2013.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on Feb 09, 2010, 02:24:30 PM
Sounds like a reboot to me.  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Feb 09, 2010, 02:31:21 PM
I sure hope not.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 09, 2010, 02:42:03 PM
Quote from: Puks on Feb 09, 2010, 02:24:30 PM
Sounds like a reboot to me.  :-\

That currently is Hollywood's dirty little word.

On a side note, about the original film. I really want one of those jungle camo Explorers. They're so cool looking.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Feb 09, 2010, 04:30:05 PM
The awe and surprise of "wow, dinosaurs" can't be repeated with the same effectiveness anymore since that's one reason I found JP3 to be a letdown. A new start for the series is a good idea in my opinon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 09, 2010, 05:30:05 PM
Quote from: Puks on Feb 09, 2010, 02:24:30 PM
Sounds like a reboot to me.  :-\

Can't be. A reboot would require the park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: peanut8 on Feb 09, 2010, 05:55:28 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Feb 09, 2010, 02:42:03 PM
I really want one of those jungle camo Explorers. They're so cool looking.

God, how I love those. I always used to ask my parents to drive real slow on some occasions, so that I could imagine I was in one of those.

One can dream...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Feb 10, 2010, 12:02:32 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Feb 09, 2010, 04:30:05 PM
The awe and surprise of "wow, dinosaurs" can't be repeated with the same effectiveness anymore since that's one reason I found JP3 to be a letdown. A new start for the series is a good idea in my opinon.
True, that's because while the dinosaur animation may be very detailed people know how it's created. While animatronics can offer variety when used with CGI there should be new approaches in how to represent realistic dinosaurs(a good story is ofcourse the first step). Ever seen Walking With Dinosaurs: Arena Spectacular? Those puppets were remarkable(saw it last year). That kind of technology would bring some more variety to the dinosaur puppetry when you don't have to keep them anchored to one spot in each shot.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: peanut8 on Feb 10, 2010, 12:07:38 PM
Quote from: Nychus on Feb 10, 2010, 12:02:32 PM
Ever seen Walking With Dinosaurs: Arena Spectacular?

The young T-Rex in that was amazing. That technology would indeed look great in a film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 10, 2010, 03:46:35 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Feb 09, 2010, 04:30:05 PM
The awe and surprise of "wow, dinosaurs" can't be repeated with the same effectiveness anymore since that's one reason I found JP3 to be a letdown. A new start for the series is a good idea in my opinon.

It's because more variety is needed. Enough with the f**king raptors and the one giant carnivore. Give us more herbivores and incorporate them into action scenes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Feb 10, 2010, 07:36:41 PM
^QFT.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 10, 2010, 08:18:31 PM
I good example is the Brontosaurus stampede from Peter Jackson's King Kong.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 10, 2010, 08:46:36 PM
There's that, ya. I do have one idea that I've mentioned several times before in this thread.

Have the humans running away from a predator or predators, then run into a big herd of herbivores, and instead of the herbivores running away like they did in JP 3, they stand and defend themselves. From there, one of two thing can happen. Humans get caught in the middle and someone ends up dying or they are on the other side as that battle is occurring, but find themselves in a different situation altogether.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Feb 10, 2010, 10:47:57 PM
QuoteWhat sort of cliffhanger? Malcolm and Harding saw the Rex leave.

You couldn't do it exactly as per Lost World, it'd need a bit of re-writing, but essentially it was Malcolm and Co. vs. the Ingen suits.  Have the film ending with them effectively losing with a To Be Continued.

QuoteRoland wasn't dumb

In that scene he was.  Dinosaurs will need to drink, and the group was sleeping right in a creek bed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Feb 10, 2010, 11:24:58 PM
Quote from: SM on Feb 10, 2010, 10:47:57 PMIn that scene he was.  Dinosaurs will need to drink, and the group was sleeping right in a creek bed.

They should have posted guards as well. That way a T-Rex won't sneek up on you in your sleep. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Feb 10, 2010, 11:27:21 PM
I also think he had the baby t-rex tied down too close to the camp.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Feb 11, 2010, 12:25:52 AM
A reboot would require the same characters, and the same park. Clearly not what we are getting. I would love to see some herbivores get into the action. Namely Triceratops, as its been featured in all three movies, but hasn't played an interesting role since the first movie. See the characters interact with a pissed off Triceratops could surely be epic, especially if its a mix of practical and CGI.

I really hope it takes a turn into a more mature direction. While i like the films alot, the second and especially the third movies seemed to remove a lot of the fear involved with the predatory dinosaurs. The Raptors in the first movie still creep me out, and there was a lot of potential with the Pteranodons being creepy and violent creatures. Wolfman is looking great, and If this script manages to bring something new, but enjoyable to the table, then I am all for Joe Johnston having another go at the franchise.

Edit-Also, I think we really need to avoid campiness. I was excited for the newest King Kong, but when I finally saw it, I couldn't take any of the dinosaur action scenes seriously. Really ruined the middle of the movie for me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 11, 2010, 12:36:06 AM
Where was the campiness in them? I'm not sure you can call Kong smashing a V.Rex's head in with a boulder or breaking its jaws campy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 11, 2010, 12:56:36 AM
Quote from: Skinner on Feb 10, 2010, 11:27:21 PM
I also think he had the baby t-rex tied down too close to the camp.

At least Roland stopped Ludlow from setting up base camp in the middle of a game trail!

"This is a game trail Mr. Ludlow. Carnivores hunt on game trails!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Feb 11, 2010, 12:57:47 AM
But don't need to drink after eating.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Feb 11, 2010, 01:05:09 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 11, 2010, 12:36:06 AM
Where was the campiness in them? I'm not sure you can call Kong smashing a V.Rex's head in with a boulder or breaking its jaws campy.

Sorry, I should've been specific. I'm talking more about the parts featuring dinosaurs and humans. Some parts of the sauropod stampede were campy, and the CGI was questionable as well. The V Rex fight was very exciting to watch, along with some of the bug pit scene, but the stampede scene just sticks out to me as poorly done. I also quite liked the Swamp sequence.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Feb 11, 2010, 01:34:34 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Feb 11, 2010, 12:56:36 AM
Quote from: Skinner on Feb 10, 2010, 11:27:21 PM
I also think he had the baby t-rex tied down too close to the camp.

At least Roland stopped Ludlow from setting up base camp in the middle of a game trail!

"This is a game trail Mr. Ludlow. Carnivores hunt on game trails!"
Another thing I've wondered is how did a flaming car get thrown so far and high in the air and crash into the side of the tree that Roland and Arjay was in?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Feb 11, 2010, 01:35:59 AM
Yeah, that always made me scratch my head a little. Really pissed-off triceratops, perhaps?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Feb 11, 2010, 01:40:33 AM
That's the only thing I could come up with. But I don't think even a really pissed off Triceratops would be strong enough to do that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alienseseses on Feb 11, 2010, 01:51:09 AM
I liked it the most as a kid, but Jurassic Part 2 is just mean spirited in tone.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 11, 2010, 01:53:18 AM
Quote from: Skinner on Feb 11, 2010, 01:34:34 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Feb 11, 2010, 12:56:36 AM
Quote from: Skinner on Feb 10, 2010, 11:27:21 PM
I also think he had the baby t-rex tied down too close to the camp.

At least Roland stopped Ludlow from setting up base camp in the middle of a game trail!

"This is a game trail Mr. Ludlow. Carnivores hunt on game trails!"
Another thing I've wondered is how did a flaming car get thrown so far and high in the air and crash into the side of the tree that Roland and Arjay was in?

That might have been due to an explosion, since there was one right before it landed in the tree.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Feb 11, 2010, 02:03:10 AM
it had to had a parachute attached then, because that was a really short flight time for a fall so slow
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Feb 11, 2010, 08:23:43 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 11, 2010, 01:53:18 AM
Quote from: Skinner on Feb 11, 2010, 01:34:34 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Feb 11, 2010, 12:56:36 AM
Quote from: Skinner on Feb 10, 2010, 11:27:21 PM
I also think he had the baby t-rex tied down too close to the camp.

At least Roland stopped Ludlow from setting up base camp in the middle of a game trail!

"This is a game trail Mr. Ludlow. Carnivores hunt on game trails!"
Another thing I've wondered is how did a flaming car get thrown so far and high in the air and crash into the side of the tree that Roland and Arjay was in?

That might have been due to an explosion, since there was one right before it landed in the tree.
Even explosions(such as the ones in the camp) can't throw a car half a mile like that. It visibly got flung with directed force which would suggest at a dinosaur. It seems too convenient evne if the car was flaming. It could have caught fire and then gotten thrown by the Trike.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 11, 2010, 02:42:01 PM
That's Spielberg. How can a T-Rex paddock turn into a 100 foot drop with a tree at the bottom? I just accept those *mistakes* for what they are. (Jurassic Park)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hive Tyrant on Feb 11, 2010, 03:31:31 PM
Truthfully, I'm afraid. Joe has been saying some scary things about this sequel, and I don't like him much since JP///.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: peanut8 on Feb 11, 2010, 03:55:50 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Feb 11, 2010, 02:42:01 PM
How can a T-Rex paddock turn into a 100 foot drop with a tree at the bottom?

It didn't.

http://www.jplegacy.org/home.php?load=jurassicpark/ffjpking.shtml (http://www.jplegacy.org/home.php?load=jurassicpark/ffjpking.shtml)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Feb 11, 2010, 10:51:14 PM
They even have an explanation on how the Rex killed the people on the ship.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Feb 12, 2010, 03:03:52 PM
In case you guys have any questions regarding the movies check that site for information.

We've heard same kind of talk about the fourth film for nine years. They have to prove something now if they want us to take them seriously.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ScarFace the Vanguard on Feb 15, 2010, 10:22:55 PM
Quote from: Darkness on Mar 26, 2007, 07:41:18 PM
Obviously, a big dinosaur has to be the main one of the film. Yeah, I'd still say T-Rex. I was disappointed he was killed in JP3.
Yeah, BUT! The film producers said it wasn't fully grown. My guess is that it was the baby from the lost world. If it was fully grown Spino would have put up a good fight but would have lost.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Feb 15, 2010, 10:27:33 PM
QuoteEven explosions(such as the ones in the camp) can't throw a car half a mile like that.

Psst... It's a movie.  With dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ScarFace the Vanguard on Feb 15, 2010, 10:32:32 PM
Quote from: Kimarhi on Feb 05, 2010, 03:35:26 AM
I didn't dislike JP2, but the Lost World novel was way better and I wished it would have been more like it.
Yeah, I wish they had a Carnotaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ScarFace the Vanguard on Feb 15, 2010, 10:37:49 PM
This movie should have a lot of kick-ASS dinosaurs. Like Acrocanthosaurus, Giganotosaurus, Carcharodontosaurus, Utahraptor, Tarbosaurus vs Velociraptors and the WHOLE ENCHILADA.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: afrocat on Feb 15, 2010, 11:03:53 PM
Btw guys at the moment this movie is not being made...howeve joe johnston keeps saying odd things especially here
http://boxoffice.com/featured_stories/2010/01/exclusive-captain-america-jp4.php
so he says it has a lot of weird shit happening in it so...hmmm. He says 4 is the start of a second trilogy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 16, 2010, 12:58:36 AM
ScarFace, don't double post.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ScarFace the Vanguard on Feb 16, 2010, 01:04:24 AM
my bad.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: BillyHudson on Feb 16, 2010, 04:14:10 AM
as long as we have t rex and raptors eating people  ;D

also i dont like short films last one i think was only 90 mins 2h i want for jurassic park IV

yeah i check imdb 127mins 129mins and 92mins so id like 4 to be around 2hrs

wud be good to get neill/dern/goldblum/attenborough back prob not likely though
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hybrid PM on Feb 16, 2010, 04:23:41 AM
Yeah JPIII was definitely too short and it was very anti-climactic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Feb 16, 2010, 03:35:25 PM
Quote from: ScarFace the Vanguard on Feb 15, 2010, 10:22:55 PM
Quote from: Darkness on Mar 26, 2007, 07:41:18 PM
Obviously, a big dinosaur has to be the main one of the film. Yeah, I'd still say T-Rex. I was disappointed he was killed in JP3.
Yeah, BUT! The film producers said it wasn't fully grown. My guess is that it was the baby from the lost world. If it was fully grown Spino would have put up a good fight but would have lost.
The Spinosaurus was undersized as well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 16, 2010, 05:15:04 PM
Quote from: BillyHudson on Feb 16, 2010, 04:14:10 AM
as long as we have t rex and raptors eating people  ;D

also i dont like short films last one i think was only 90 mins 2h i want for jurassic park IV

yeah i check imdb 127mins 129mins and 92mins so id like 4 to be around 2hrs

wud be good to get neill/dern/goldblum/attenborough back prob not likely though

Being such an avid JP fan I'd love to sit for 3hrs watching a Jp film, wouldn't bother me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 16, 2010, 09:38:59 PM
Quote from: Skinner on Feb 16, 2010, 03:35:25 PM
Quote from: ScarFace the Vanguard on Feb 15, 2010, 10:22:55 PM
Quote from: Darkness on Mar 26, 2007, 07:41:18 PM
Obviously, a big dinosaur has to be the main one of the film. Yeah, I'd still say T-Rex. I was disappointed he was killed in JP3.
Yeah, BUT! The film producers said it wasn't fully grown. My guess is that it was the baby from the lost world. If it was fully grown Spino would have put up a good fight but would have lost.
The Spinosaurus was undersized as well.

It definitely wasn't undersized.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Feb 16, 2010, 09:45:03 PM
Way, 69 pages! ... Shows dedication.  :-[
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Feb 16, 2010, 09:47:33 PM
oh, Universal Studios, hear our pledges!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: afrocat on Feb 16, 2010, 09:57:52 PM
Quote from: Skinner on Feb 16, 2010, 03:35:25 PM
Quote from: ScarFace the Vanguard on Feb 15, 2010, 10:22:55 PM
Quote from: Darkness on Mar 26, 2007, 07:41:18 PM
Obviously, a big dinosaur has to be the main one of the film. Yeah, I'd still say T-Rex. I was disappointed he was killed in JP3.
Yeah, BUT! The film producers said it wasn't fully grown. My guess is that it was the baby from the lost world. If it was fully grown Spino would have put up a good fight but would have lost.
The Spinosaurus was undersized as well.
Hi I love Dinos. The spino was NOT undersized it was in fact unrealisticly oversized. Just like the velicoraptors(though in JP3 they were more realistic than the other two)
"Tyrannosaurids were the most intelligent, most powerful etc Therepods to ever walk the Earth and T.Rex was the most extreme example of them. Spinosaurus Aegypticus was, in my opinion and indeed the opinion of many scientists, a fish-eater. Just look at it! It's jaws were extremely narrow, suggesting it could not tear off large amounts of meat, which is crucial in a fight. Also, it is most likely that Spinosaurus Aegypticus did not have a very powerful bite in comparison to other Therepods. A fully grown T.Rex wielded a bite force of AT LEAST 230,000N. A bite, even of partial power, that powerful would turn any bone in S.Aegypticus' body to mush. One bite from T.Rex would kill Spinosaurus regardless of whether it hits the neck or other regions. The same does not apply for Spinosaurus."
There some science fo you ass. lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Feb 16, 2010, 10:35:37 PM
That meddlesome frog DNA!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Feb 16, 2010, 10:52:55 PM
I love that little thing. Any scientific inaccuracies with the dinos can just be blamed on the frog DNA contamination!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: afrocat on Feb 16, 2010, 11:01:12 PM
Haha ah yes that damn frog DNA. The reasons the raptors are able to change sex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Feb 16, 2010, 11:04:40 PM
I wonder if any of the dinosaurs have long, sticky tongues because of that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Feb 16, 2010, 11:21:46 PM
Quote from: afrocat on Feb 16, 2010, 09:57:52 PM
Quote from: Skinner on Feb 16, 2010, 03:35:25 PM
Quote from: ScarFace the Vanguard on Feb 15, 2010, 10:22:55 PM
Quote from: Darkness on Mar 26, 2007, 07:41:18 PM
Obviously, a big dinosaur has to be the main one of the film. Yeah, I'd still say T-Rex. I was disappointed he was killed in JP3.
Yeah, BUT! The film producers said it wasn't fully grown. My guess is that it was the baby from the lost world. If it was fully grown Spino would have put up a good fight but would have lost.
The Spinosaurus was undersized as well.
Hi I love Dinos. The spino was NOT undersized it was in fact unrealisticly oversized. Just like the velicoraptors(though in JP3 they were more realistic than the other two)
"Tyrannosaurids were the most intelligent, most powerful etc Therepods to ever walk the Earth and T.Rex was the most extreme example of them. Spinosaurus Aegypticus was, in my opinion and indeed the opinion of many scientists, a fish-eater. Just look at it! It's jaws were extremely narrow, suggesting it could not tear off large amounts of meat, which is crucial in a fight. Also, it is most likely that Spinosaurus Aegypticus did not have a very powerful bite in comparison to other Therepods. A fully grown T.Rex wielded a bite force of AT LEAST 230,000N. A bite, even of partial power, that powerful would turn any bone in S.Aegypticus' body to mush. One bite from T.Rex would kill Spinosaurus regardless of whether it hits the neck or other regions. The same does not apply for Spinosaurus."
There some science fo you ass. lol
What about this?

http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/monsters-resurrected-biggest-killer-dino.html
http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/monsters-resurrected-spinosaurus-killing-style.html
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 16, 2010, 11:27:08 PM
I don't get why people have this fascination about which predatory dinosaur was the biggest and could take down a t-rex or spino.

And just to add I'm not fussed if we don't see any new species in the future films because come on, how many strands of dino DNA could they have found realistically?

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: afrocat on Feb 16, 2010, 11:28:44 PM
All Im saying is the spinos ate freaking fish they were not predatory animals.
EDIT: You know in the movie idk if its one or two it states how many species live on isla nublar(the island that didnt get destroyed in JP)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Feb 16, 2010, 11:31:38 PM
Yes, obviously he ate a lot of fish, but he wasn't a wimp.  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 16, 2010, 11:32:40 PM
They must of eaten more than just fish. Its like when they theorized that the t-rex was only scavager which was bull because why would an animal of that size and strength only look for dead bodies? Obviously if a t-rex stumbled on a body and was hungry it'd eat the remains like any carnivore would but it obivously wasn't just a scavager.
The same as a spino of that size and strength wouldn't only eat fish.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Feb 16, 2010, 11:35:00 PM
Just look at blue whales; they are the largest animals to ever have inhabited our planet, yet they only eat creatures that are barely visible to the naked eye.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 16, 2010, 11:36:50 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Feb 16, 2010, 11:35:00 PM
Just look at blue whales; they are the largest animals to ever have inhabited our planet, yet they only eat creatures that are barely visible to the naked eye.

Yeah but they're designed to do that. The Spinosaurus just looking at it you can tell from all what mother nature has given it the animal doesn't just stand in a river and fish. I imagine them like bears they eat a variety of things.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Feb 16, 2010, 11:41:51 PM
Yeah, it probably ate more than fish. But that jaw design is not suited for taking out large prey, so it killing a T. Rex is pretty unlikely.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Feb 16, 2010, 11:46:28 PM
Also how did Spinosaurus have weak jaws if it had the same jaw structure as crocodiles which have one of the strongest bites in the world?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 16, 2010, 11:47:26 PM
we'll agree to disagree, because I think the door swings both ways with a T-rex Spino fight. Plus the thing about the Spino's jaws, yeah it was long (probably to help with fishing I don't disagree with that) but it was also massive and very power. Look at crocodiles today with their long jaws and how much power per square inch they have then imagine a Spinosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 16, 2010, 11:49:56 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffilm.onet.pl%2Foficjalne%2Fjurassic_park_3%2Fhtm%2F_i%2Ftla%2Fspino%2FSPINO_WP_1024.JPG&hash=ae10c19a0445e2711e6d10cd0e4edffd5400192d)

Thinking about it wouldn't the fish see this beast coming and just flee?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: afrocat on Feb 16, 2010, 11:51:32 PM
They dont have the same jaws as a crocodile they have the same jaws as that other thing. Okay brb Im gonna come back with proof of this other jawed croc like thing
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gharial Gharials and caimans have more similar jaw  structure.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FFile%3AGavialis_gangeticus.jpg&hash=16a8b14bef3d654f580caf684cf05af326626d24)
And btw those JP pics arnt actually accurate there movie size.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 16, 2010, 11:52:58 PM
The biggest Spinosaurus skeleton found is the size of the one represented in JP. Hence why they used it because it was a new find and they thought it'd be awesome to represent one on film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: afrocat on Feb 16, 2010, 11:54:57 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2F7%2F71%2F3_giant_carnivore.jpg&hash=59ccaec8857d5f88a8f610cd542f582abe336df0)
Yes most spinos arnt that big. Trexs arnt the largest either. Gigasaurus and Ultrasaurs are larger.
NOTE: This is all from memory not fact cuz I used to be a Dino fanatic as a child and i used to want to be a paleotoligist. So yea lol i may be wrong
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 16, 2010, 11:56:33 PM
Either way its still massive so the fish would see it coming!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Feb 16, 2010, 11:57:48 PM
Not if it was fast.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Feb 16, 2010, 11:59:14 PM
Or if he just stood really still in one place for a while and didn't move.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 17, 2010, 12:03:56 AM
Quote from: Skinner on Feb 16, 2010, 11:59:14 PM
Or if he just stood really still in one place for a while and didn't move.

Good point. Moving on look at this > http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/01/100127-dinosaurs-color-feathers-science/o/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: afrocat on Feb 17, 2010, 12:09:18 AM
Im almost sure that three years old. The first couple feathered dino discoveries were around the time JP3 went into development right? Nonetheless coo. I think someone should get around to cloning a dino. They found tissue last year from a frozen corpse. It was only half decayed before it froze so..
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Feb 17, 2010, 12:14:12 AM
I think they will at least clone a mammoth while were alive.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: afrocat on Feb 17, 2010, 12:23:08 AM
Quote from: Skinner on Feb 17, 2010, 12:14:12 AM
I think they will at least clone a mammoth while were alive.
You say that as if our generation is going to end like the last two! I feel as if by the time im in my nineties there will be life extenders. Or the world will be nuked by then but im gonna try to be optimistic. But man theyve found multiple mammoths and none have been cloned yet what the heck!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 17, 2010, 12:30:58 AM
Quote from: afrocat on Feb 17, 2010, 12:09:18 AM
Im almost sure that three years old. The first couple feathered dino discoveries were around the time JP3 went into development right?

Its not about the feathers in that link if you read into it.  ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: afrocat on Feb 17, 2010, 01:00:50 AM
Ha my bad.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 17, 2010, 04:08:25 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Feb 16, 2010, 11:47:26 PM
we'll agree to disagree, because I think the door swings both ways with a T-rex Spino fight. Plus the thing about the Spino's jaws, yeah it was long (probably to help with fishing I don't disagree with that) but it was also massive and very power. Look at crocodiles today with their long jaws and how much power per square inch they have then imagine a Spinosaurus.

The reason it had jaws like a crocodile were to fish out, well, fish. It's already been proven too, through scientific testing, via crocodiles, that T.Rex had the strongest bite of any land-based predator in history. Spinosaurus jaws weren't strong enough to accomplish that goal, and the teeth weren't designed for it. T.Rex, and the other similarly sized tyrannosaurids, had teeth that were thick from side to side and were designed for cracking and crushing. The carnosaurs, like Spinosaurus and Giganotosaurus, had teeth that were much thinner and designed for slicing. If they hit a bone, they'd snap instantly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: afrocat on Feb 17, 2010, 04:23:00 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 17, 2010, 04:08:25 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Feb 16, 2010, 11:47:26 PM
we'll agree to disagree, because I think the door swings both ways with a T-rex Spino fight. Plus the thing about the Spino's jaws, yeah it was long (probably to help with fishing I don't disagree with that) but it was also massive and very power. Look at crocodiles today with their long jaws and how much power per square inch they have then imagine a Spinosaurus.

The reason it had jaws like a crocodile were to fish out, well, fish. It's already been proven too, through scientific testing, via crocodiles, that T.Rex had the strongest bite of any land-based predator in history. Spinosaurus jaws weren't strong enough to accomplish that goal, and the teeth weren't designed for it. T.Rex, and the other similarly sized tyrannosaurids, had teeth that were thick from side to side and were designed for cracking and crushing. The carnosaurs, like Spinosaurus and Giganotosaurus, had teeth that were much thinner and designed for slicing. If they hit a bone, they'd snap instantly.
DoomRulz Rules. ^Win.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Feb 17, 2010, 08:33:55 PM
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/tvnews.php?id=63404
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on Feb 17, 2010, 08:45:35 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Feb 17, 2010, 12:03:56 AM
Quote from: Skinner on Feb 16, 2010, 11:59:14 PM
Or if he just stood really still in one place for a while and didn't move.

Good point. Moving on look at this > http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/01/100127-dinosaurs-color-feathers-science/o/

Wow that's awesome!  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 17, 2010, 10:18:53 PM
Quote from: Skinner on Feb 17, 2010, 08:33:55 PM
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/tvnews.php?id=63404

Sounds like Land of the Lost, 2145.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: afrocat on Feb 17, 2010, 10:28:22 PM
Hahahaha. Thatd be interesting. Im game for anything that involves Steven Speilberg. Unless it involves George Lucas.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Corporal Lewis Hicks on Feb 26, 2010, 10:34:32 PM
Can't wait I hope jeff goldblum comes back in this one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 26, 2010, 10:42:15 PM
"Now I am...ah...in the car talking to myself. That's, that's chaos."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Feb 26, 2010, 10:45:36 PM
"Life... finds a way."

I also hope Sam Neill is in this one too.

"He slashes at you with this; a six inch retractable claw, like a razor, on the middle toe. They don't bother to bite the jugular, like a lion, they slash just here, or here, or maybe across the belly, spilling your intestines. Point is, you're alive when they start to eat you."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 26, 2010, 10:47:20 PM
Neill would be awesome to return!  8)

"Mr. Hammond, I've decided not to endorse your park!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 27, 2010, 01:14:09 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Feb 26, 2010, 10:42:15 PM
"Now I am...ah...in the car talking to myself. That's, that's chaos."

Pffft. "John, if the Pirates of the Caribbean breaks down, the pirates don't eat the tourists".

;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Feb 27, 2010, 04:48:54 AM
That has got to be one of the best lines in cinema!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 27, 2010, 04:51:23 AM
"Pushing team move in there. I want tazers on full charge!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Feb 27, 2010, 04:53:27 AM
"Shoot her!"

"That's- that's- that's a dinosaur!"

"You bred raptors?!?"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Feb 27, 2010, 04:58:20 AM
"A T-Rex? You said you have a T-Rex?"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 27, 2010, 04:59:09 AM
"When ya gotta go, ya gotta go."

"They should all be destroyed!"

"That is one big pile of shit."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Feb 27, 2010, 05:04:04 AM
So many great lines, so little time!

"He suffers from a deplorable excess of personality." :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Feb 27, 2010, 05:05:50 AM
My favorite:
"Clever girl..."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 27, 2010, 05:05:58 AM
"Where you're going, the geese chase you!"

"Mommys very angry."

"Carter! I got turned around here..."

;D

Clever girl, is a great line, Skinner!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Feb 27, 2010, 05:06:28 AM
Hey! That's a different movie!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 27, 2010, 05:07:45 AM
Right...

"Ah Ah Ah, you didn't say the magic word!"

"PLEASE!!!!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Feb 27, 2010, 05:10:27 AM
"If I lose you it's just me and the damn tourist."
How do you like that? ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 27, 2010, 05:12:01 AM
"Cooper's a professional. He can handle himself!"  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Feb 27, 2010, 05:15:57 AM
"What're you trying to look like, a secret agent?"

"Dodgson, Dodgson, we got Dodgson here!"

"How many times did I tell you we need locking mechanisms on the vehicle doors!"

"Stick! Stick, stupid! Fetch the stick!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 27, 2010, 05:17:10 AM
"We're being hunted. In the bushes, straight ahead. I got her..."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Feb 27, 2010, 05:18:58 AM
"Hold on to your butts."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 27, 2010, 05:22:33 AM
"I can't get Jurassic Park back online without Dennis Nedry."

"It's not just a stroll, you know?"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Feb 27, 2010, 05:58:00 AM
Muldoon: I think this was Gennaro.
Ellie: [about 15 feet away] I think this was too...

Malcolm: Anybody hear that? It's an... It's an impact tremor, that's what it is... I'm fairly alarmed here.

Hammond: I don't believe it! Hah! I don't believe it! You're supposed to come here and defend me against these characters and the only one I've got on my side is the bloodsucking lawyer!
Gennaro: Thank you.

Malcolm: [He leans to face camera in electric tour car when the T-Rex doesn't appear] Now eventually you might have dinosaurs on your, on your dinosaur tour, right? Hello?  

Hammond: [Hammond watches the camera feed with his face in his hands] I really do hate that man.

Hammond: Find Nedry! Check the vending machines!

Dr. Grant: Their radio is out too. Gennarro said to stay put.
Malcolm: The kids OK?
Dr. Grant: I didn't ask. Why wouldn't they be?
Malcolm: Kids get scared.
Dr. Grant: What's to be scared about? It's just a little hiccup in the power...
Malcolm: I didn't say I was scared.
Dr. Grant: I didn't say you were scared.
Malcolm: I know.


God, I love this movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Feb 27, 2010, 05:59:38 AM
It is the quintessential film of my childhood. There is no moment in my life that I can remember in which I hadn't seen Jurassic Park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Feb 27, 2010, 09:19:04 AM
"Remind me to thank John for a lovely weekend." 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 27, 2010, 02:43:04 PM
Grant: "Hey we were saving that!"

Hammond: "For today, I guarantee it."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 27, 2010, 03:03:41 PM
What do the have in there, King Kong?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: peanut8 on Feb 27, 2010, 03:10:28 PM
"You know, if you really wanted to scare the kid you could've just pulled a gun on him."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Feb 27, 2010, 05:25:04 PM
"No! No! NO! AAAUUURRRRGHHHRRGHHAAURGH!!!!!!!!!!!!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 27, 2010, 10:20:43 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Feb 27, 2010, 05:15:57 AM
"Stick! Stick, stupid! Fetch the stick!"

I swear, first time I saw the film, I thought that's why the Dilophosaurus killed Nedry lol. Because he called it stupid!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 27, 2010, 11:36:54 PM
"Get off the stick! Bloody move!"

"Bingo! Dino DNA!"

Best scene in the film!

Spoiler
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShUgQCI1P_I
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ShadowStalker on Feb 27, 2010, 11:43:55 PM
This movie is one of the greatest!! It pretty much jump started my thrill of dinosaurs! lol
They should defiently make the 4th one, this series needs it  honestly, although i liked Jp3 it wasnt the closure i would look for in ending the series
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Feb 28, 2010, 03:04:15 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 27, 2010, 10:20:43 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Feb 27, 2010, 05:15:57 AM
"Stick! Stick, stupid! Fetch the stick!"

I swear, first time I saw the film, I thought that's why the Dilophosaurus killed Nedry lol. Because he called it stupid!

I always thought it was because he was fat; lots of meat on 'dem bones.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 28, 2010, 03:31:47 AM
Thee greatest movie design for a vehicle of all time!  :o

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffraulo.com%2Forlando%2Fioa%2Fimages%2FJurassic%2520Park%2520Jeep.jpg&hash=be1d01afd92cb7ab0d8c3085c72996750c709ee9)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Feb 28, 2010, 03:59:06 AM
I always wanted one of those as a kid; I still kinda do.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 28, 2010, 04:08:44 AM
"Aren't they glorious!?"  ;)  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Feb 28, 2010, 04:17:54 AM
"By the way, Dr Sattler, shes not like available is she?"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Feb 28, 2010, 04:26:12 AM
I stood right there in between that Jeep, and the Spinosaurus in the background when I was 11!
There was also one of the Safari jeeps from The Lost World there. That area of Universal Studios (Hollywood) was like a dream come true for me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Feb 28, 2010, 04:27:37 AM
Cool, I'm going there this summer and I hope to get a picture in the same place.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Feb 28, 2010, 04:33:47 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Feb 28, 2010, 04:26:12 AM
I stood right there in between that Jeep, and the Spinosaurus in the background when I was 11!
There was also one of the Safari jeeps from The Lost World there. That area of Universal Studios (Hollywood) was like a dream come true for me.

It was for we as well. I loved that ride.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 28, 2010, 04:36:37 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Feb 28, 2010, 04:26:12 AM
I stood right there in between that Jeep, and the Spinosaurus in the background when I was 11!
There was also one of the Safari jeeps from The Lost World there. That area of Universal Studios (Hollywood) was like a dream come true for me.

Same with me! Except the set up for me was in Orlando Florida, when I went to Disney World.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: peanut8 on Feb 28, 2010, 09:06:18 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Feb 28, 2010, 04:26:12 AM
That area of Universal Studios (Hollywood) was like a dream come true for me.

That goddamn waterfall was a NIGHTMARE for me. It was probably the last stroke in my mind's decision to hate rollercoasters forevermore.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 28, 2010, 05:06:39 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Feb 28, 2010, 03:31:47 AM
Thee greatest movie design for a vehicle of all time!  :o

http://fraulo.com/orlando/ioa/images/Jurassic%20Park%20Jeep.jpg

I had my photo taken there, but when they still had the T.Rex. Now they replaced it with the f**king Spino :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Feb 28, 2010, 07:36:31 PM
What?!?!?!? That's blasphemy!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 28, 2010, 07:54:39 PM
Look in the photo's background dude. That's not Rexy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Feb 28, 2010, 08:03:04 PM
The only thing that'll cheer me up now is Canada winning the gold. :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Undeadite on Feb 28, 2010, 08:09:38 PM
Wow, you're not easy to please lol.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Feb 28, 2010, 08:12:21 PM
 >:( You'll choke on those words before this day is through.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Feb 28, 2010, 08:14:06 PM
Quote from: Undeadite on Feb 28, 2010, 08:09:38 PM
Wow, you're not easy to please lol.

He's a Prick. but he's our Prick.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Undeadite on Feb 28, 2010, 08:27:21 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Feb 28, 2010, 08:12:21 PM
>:( You'll choke on those words before this day is through.

We'll see, lol.

Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Feb 28, 2010, 08:14:06 PM
He's a Prick. but he's our Prick.

You talking about me or SpaceMarines?  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 28, 2010, 08:59:58 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Feb 28, 2010, 08:03:04 PM
The only thing that'll cheer me up now is Canada winning the gold. :(

I wouldn't worry 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Feb 28, 2010, 09:02:01 PM
Yeah, things are looking pretty good at the moment. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Feb 28, 2010, 09:34:32 PM
Quote from: Undeadite on Feb 28, 2010, 08:27:21 PM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Feb 28, 2010, 08:14:06 PM
He's a Prick. but he's our Prick.

You talking about me or SpaceMarines?  :D

depends. do you consider yourself a prick?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Undeadite on Feb 28, 2010, 09:35:10 PM
Ill let my fans decide that.  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 28, 2010, 10:28:47 PM
The magic of Jurassic Park. This will always be my favourite film of all time.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6Y68dmfOIw
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 01, 2010, 12:40:14 AM
I need to go and watch that again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 01, 2010, 12:41:24 AM
I am about to watch JPIII. I wasn't too fond of it the first few times. Who knows I might like it this time around.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dark Passenger on Mar 01, 2010, 12:43:32 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Mar 01, 2010, 12:41:24 AM
I am about to watch JPIII. I wasn't too found of it the first few times. Who knows I might like it this time around.

when i first wtached it i thought it was decent enough but the special effects really are a let down, some CG scenes are obiously computer generated and they seemed to not even try to match the animatronics to the CG counterparts unlike in the fist one
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ShadowStalker on Mar 01, 2010, 01:27:24 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Mar 01, 2010, 12:41:24 AM
I am about to watch JPIII. I wasn't too fond of it the first few times. Who knows I might like it this time around.

I actually enjoyed JP3 as an popcorn movie, but i hope do make a 4th one to rightfully end the series or set up to go in different direction or something! JP3 just didnt cut it
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Mar 01, 2010, 01:31:13 AM
I loved JP 3's raptor design.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 01, 2010, 03:23:31 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Mar 01, 2010, 12:41:24 AM
I am about to watch JPIII. I wasn't too fond of it the first few times. Who knows I might like it this time around.

It's too short. And it was poorly paced. I would've been happier, had the T.Rex/Spino fight been saved for the sequence in the water at the end.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 01, 2010, 03:25:36 AM
Dug JP3 more than JP2.  The end of JP3 was awful though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 01, 2010, 03:26:33 AM
Heh, I finished watching it a while ago. (1 hour and 30 minute run time). And I still ain't too fond of it. Nash, Cooper are killed way too quickly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 01, 2010, 03:27:12 AM
Quote from: SM on Mar 01, 2010, 03:25:36 AM
Dug JP3 more than JP2.  The end of JP3 was awful though.

now that is surprising. JP2 was so much more entertaining.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Undeadite on Mar 01, 2010, 03:29:49 AM
JP2 was definitely entertaining, but it was really convoluted. There was a lot of needless buildup, and the final act on the mainland felt like an entirely different flick. It should have ended with Malcolm and Sarah discovering that the T-Rex had been taken off the island and had the third be set entirely in the city.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 01, 2010, 03:33:52 AM
Quotenow that is surprising. JP2 was so much more entertaining.

Bits were.  It took itself too seriously.  And the ending was arguably worse than JP3.  At least JP3 ended quickly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 01, 2010, 03:35:41 AM
I don't understand people's beef with JP2's ending. We knew Ludlow wanted to bring back the T.Rex in the first place. The outcome of that shouldn't have been foregone in my opinion.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 01, 2010, 03:37:10 AM
I think I already said my peice about the end of JP2 on this thread.  Suffice to say that Undeadite echoed it above.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 01, 2010, 03:45:00 AM
The whole point of INGEN going to the island was to capture the animals, hence them in the cages when Nick Van Owen released them. They were going to set up a theme park in San Diego. Then everything went to hell. And the only salvageable animal was the T-Rex. I agree with DoomRulz, I have no issue with the second act/ending of the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Undeadite on Mar 01, 2010, 03:46:08 AM
But there didn't need to be an hour and a half to get from Isla Sorna to San Diego. Had the raptor attack been fleshed out a little bit, it would have been a very fun climactic ending. Instead there was the crash at the peer (which is just as confusing as the opening to Alien 3) and another twenty minutes of buildup to a mediocre showdown with the T-Rex that was reminiscent to the car chase in the first film. If the whole point of the film was to get to San Diego, it would have been more productive to make the entire film a bridge and have the mainland attack done right in the next movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 01, 2010, 03:48:01 AM
You mean end it on a cliffhanger? Hm, I do remember SM mentioning that now that I think about it, but it would've been silly. That sort of thing doesn't work in movies for me. I don't want to wait for 3 years or so for the next film to come out, assuming it does at all. This isn't like TV where you know for sure you'll get a follow-up episode.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 01, 2010, 03:50:25 AM
And at that point, I don't think Spielberg wanted to invest in another 1 to 2 years of planning another movie. He felt he should end it there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 01, 2010, 03:51:26 AM
QuoteYou mean end it on a cliffhanger? Hm, I do remember SM mentioning that now that I think about it, but it would've been silly. That sort of thing doesn't work in movies for me. I don't want to wait for 3 years or so for the next film to come out, assuming it does at all. This isn't like TV where you know for sure you'll get a follow-up episode.

It's Jurassic Park.  It's not like it's not going to make enormous amounts of money.  Plus they coulda done like BTTF or LOTR and shot 2 and 3 back to back after the success of the first film.

And it worked an absolute treat for Empire Strikes Back.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 01, 2010, 03:52:48 AM
Jurassic Park is one of the highest grossing films of all time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Undeadite on Mar 01, 2010, 03:55:10 AM
Even if the cliffhanger was never given a conclusion, it would have left the possibility of a movie that could have been better than the third movie we got. Spielberg could have pushed for a package deal if the script assumed there would be a third film.

If a contract for two films couldn't have been made, then there still could have been improvements made to the ending. For a climax it felt weak. The duel T-Rex attack against the convoy and the raptors were far more engaging and terrifying. Overall, I felt the buildup lead nowhere.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 01, 2010, 03:59:24 AM
Yep.  And like the start of Saving Private Ryan, they were sequences in the wrong part of the film.  And as I also think I said the climax lacked Van Owen and Roland, which didn't help it all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 01, 2010, 04:03:08 AM
What do you mean about Saving Private Ryan? If you mean by Ryan in the cemetery when he's old, the film is about him *recalling, remembering* the events that took place.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 01, 2010, 04:08:49 AM
That was a whole other problem when Ryan was remembering events he never witnessed...

No, I meant the major setpeice for the film was in the first 20 minutes, and they could never top that spectacle for the rest of the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Undeadite on Mar 01, 2010, 04:13:23 AM
I noticed that too. Had that sequence been broken up and introduced throughout the course of the film it would have made it a bit better, but to be honest I don't know how the pacing would have worked built around it.

In any case, as much as I love Lost World, I can't help but tune out once they get into the helicopter at the end.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 01, 2010, 04:13:50 AM
Heh, that's what D-Day was like, it happend *first* historically. I don't know how you would put a D-Day sequence in later.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Undeadite on Mar 01, 2010, 04:16:17 AM
There would have to be more parts where old Ryan was actively remembering, like in The Green Mile. Or instead take a Slaughterhouse Five approach and make everything nonlinear and cyclical.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 01, 2010, 04:20:05 AM
QuoteHeh, that's what D-Day was like, it happend *first* historically. I don't know how you would put a D-Day sequence in later.

You couldn't, which was a fault with the plotting more than anything else.  It starts with this awesomely intense battle, then sorta peters out into a smaller personal story - but one with another much smaller battle at the end.  Not criticising SPR, but found that aspect a bit disappointing.

Though Empire Strikes Back did the same thing to a degree, but had the benefit of another film to follow which DID have the massive battle at the end.

QuoteInsert Quote
There would have to be more parts where old Ryan was actively remembering, like in The Green Mile. Or instead take a Slaughterhouse Five approach and make everything nonlinear and cyclical.

That might've worked.  Start the film after the landing, then tease out tidbits throughout the film, until Tom Hanks relates the entire landing to Matt Damon in flashback.  Would've also fixed the plot hole I mentioned earlier.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Mar 02, 2010, 10:06:24 AM
Quote from: Undeadite on Mar 01, 2010, 03:55:10 AM
Even if the cliffhanger was never given a conclusion, it would have left the possibility of a movie that could have been better than the third movie we got. Spielberg could have pushed for a package deal if the script assumed there would be a third film.

If a contract for two films couldn't have been made, then there still could have been improvements made to the ending. For a climax it felt weak. The duel T-Rex attack against the convoy and the raptors were far more engaging and terrifying. Overall, I felt the buildup lead nowhere.
I personally feel that the reason for things standing out in TLW are because Spielberg himself has some kind of problem in giving it a structure that properly does it justice. The San Diego sequence is also proof of this, only existing because he wanted it to end. His heart just wasn't in it and the movie suffered a blow thanks to it. I mean, what the heck is it even with the amphitheater in the first place, the novel doesn't have it and we didn't even have any hint of it in the first movie(such a construction would be public knowledge thus easy to mention by someone). It's like the whole concept was just pulled out of someone's rear end just to pad the film with a convenient plot device. It sure does feel like padding when the actual novel counterpart had so much more to offer. I mean, why InGen? Why not just use BioSyn? They were the ones responsible for the espionage in the first movie. Leaving them out simply drains that potential. And the novel also had color shifting predators. What made them ignore all that potential? It's quite frankly impossible to answer. It sure does show in the movie which feels like a completely different story. It's not like they had to change everything just to make it fit with the first movie. It's almost blasphemy.

To me the trailer sequence actually feels forced. Read the version in the actual Michael Crichton novel and you know what I mean. The parts after Eddie arrives feel incredibly rigged to such an extent that the climax feels impossible in how the "hero characters" survive not only the drop of the one half but the entire trailer without ever hitting it. It's like the rope was magically suspended to avoid this. Plus the trailers wouldn't fall like that in real life which the novel version actually aknowledges by only destroying the other half. I infact change the channel during this bit because of how much it bugs the hell out of me. It's just one immense, elaborate gimmick to bring the movie from point A to point B without playing a real part in the story.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Corporal Lewis Hicks on Mar 02, 2010, 03:49:35 PM
Just watched Jp the lost world and Its got me hyped for another film!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien91 on Mar 03, 2010, 03:03:50 PM
i LOVE this frachise!!!!!!!!!!!!! ;D ;D ;D

one of my top 2 fav films of all time

But why did they kill Rex off in JP3?
i never understood that

and was it one of the Rex's for TLW?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 03, 2010, 05:25:30 PM
Quote from: Alien91 on Mar 03, 2010, 03:03:50 PM
and was it one of the Rex's for TLW?
Definitely no, the color scheme was different (it was more lightly colored).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Mar 03, 2010, 06:18:10 PM
No one knows what T-Rex the one in JP3 was. There surely must have been more offspring from the pair in TLW than the one baby we saw. The third movie nevertheless didn't show the T-Rex enough respect in it's haste to replace it with Spinosaurus(which never got the same kind of buildup as an animal like Big T because of how plain villainous they made him).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 03, 2010, 10:19:26 PM
Quote from: Alien91 on Mar 03, 2010, 03:03:50 PM
But why did they kill Rex off in JP3?
i never understood that

They wanted something new. That's it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 03, 2010, 10:24:35 PM
It was bullshit, in my opinion.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 03, 2010, 10:25:15 PM
That's what happens when you consult with Jack Horner.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dark Passenger on Mar 03, 2010, 10:27:52 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Mar 03, 2010, 10:24:35 PM
It was bullshit, in my opinion.

yeh true....i mean i dont mind that they used a different dino but to completely kill the rex off? they could have just used them both in the film.....

QuoteThat's what happens when you consult with Jack Horner

rex aint a fish eater so in my opinion he shoulda snapped spinos neck in one bite.....dunno what horners thinkin....
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on Mar 03, 2010, 10:45:13 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 03, 2010, 10:25:15 PM
That's what happens when you consult with Jack Horner.

A paleontologist approved of a scene where the Spino kills a T-Rex with one bite of its fishing jaws?

Jesus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: RumorControl on Mar 03, 2010, 10:53:01 PM
A description of my theater-going experiences of the JP movies:

JP, 2 times in 1993: "F*cking awesome!"
TLW, in 1997: "Pretty cool."
JP3, in 2001: "I need to find a rape crisis center."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Mar 03, 2010, 10:55:41 PM
I think instead of showing Spino kill Rex they should have had the characters escape while the battle was still happening so you don't know what happens. Then have a second T-Rex cameo later in the film so it almost looks like there was no winner.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: tutut125 on Mar 03, 2010, 10:56:27 PM
i want to see a predalien come in and pown dino butt.... ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 03, 2010, 10:57:20 PM
QuoteJP3, in 2001: "I need to find a rape crisis center."

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.x-entertainment.com%2Farticles%2F0262%2Fack1.jpg&hash=15a6265cedc26328f993c20c4fa9065284e60698)

Prepare to jump to hyperbole on my mark!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Mar 04, 2010, 04:25:39 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 28, 2010, 05:06:39 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Feb 28, 2010, 03:31:47 AM
Thee greatest movie design for a vehicle of all time!  :o

http://fraulo.com/orlando/ioa/images/Jurassic%20Park%20Jeep.jpg

I had my photo taken there, but when they still had the T.Rex. Now they replaced it with the f**king Spino :(
I went the year JP 3 came out- I probably damn well missed the real king of Dinosaurs by one year!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien91 on Mar 04, 2010, 02:13:58 PM
Rex vs Spino battle shouldve been saved for the end

Group tries to escape and Spino corners them then the Rex saves the day just like in the 1st JP
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 04, 2010, 02:34:03 PM
The thing about JP3 is that it had a heavily emphasis on Raptors. The Lost World had the long grass scene and the abandoned station, and that was it. Mostly the Rex's movie. JP3 used Raptors way more than the Spino.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 04, 2010, 07:46:40 PM
As long as the tyrannosaur is the main large predator in this new "trilogy" I'll be happy. I hope its goes more towards the the company side of things, like the movie Wall Street but with dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 05, 2010, 02:58:37 AM
Quote from: Puks on Mar 03, 2010, 10:45:13 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 03, 2010, 10:25:15 PM
That's what happens when you consult with Jack Horner.

A paleontologist approved of a scene where the Spino kills a T-Rex with one bite of its fishing jaws?

Jesus.

Never mind that, the only thing worse than that was the way the Spino did it. Watch closely, he actually bends the neck sideways and snaps it.

Since when did dinosaurs learn jiu-jitsu?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 05, 2010, 03:35:27 AM
Geez it's a freaking film about creatures that have extinct for 65 million years...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 05, 2010, 03:37:04 AM
Genetically Engineered Theme Park Monsters to be exact.  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 05, 2010, 03:40:42 AM
Which just multilplies the already myriad guesses involved.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 05, 2010, 03:41:16 AM
Quote from: SM on Mar 05, 2010, 03:35:27 AM
Geez it's a freaking film about creatures that have extinct for 65 million years...

And? It was still stupid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 05, 2010, 03:17:02 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 05, 2010, 02:58:37 AM
Quote from: Puks on Mar 03, 2010, 10:45:13 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 03, 2010, 10:25:15 PM
That's what happens when you consult with Jack Horner.

A paleontologist approved of a scene where the Spino kills a T-Rex with one bite of its fishing jaws?

Jesus.

Never mind that, the only thing worse than that was the way the Spino did it. Watch closely, he actually bends the neck sideways and snaps it.

Since when did dinosaurs learn jiu-jitsu?

Oh jeez what do you call the jiu-jitsu move again where you bite the neck of your opponent and kill them? I forget.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Mar 05, 2010, 05:18:34 PM
Even prehistoric animals are just animals. I've never hear of carnivores snapping necks. Its mostly about tearing the jugular and crushing windpipes so the prey suffocates/bleeds to death.

I also feel the third movie should have been smarter. The storyline is the worst issue if you asked me. It's really just cheap junk piled on top of the pre-existing continuity. The other problem I have with it is the way they "explained" the change from leathery lizard-like Raptors to more avian ones with quills on their heads. If they had atleast digitally enhanced the Raptor in Grant's nightmare to better be like the original type none of this would have to explained. Now it has to be or else the new film(s) will contradict the foundation which it/they owe existence to. If the two sequels so far had been written accordingly the very first movie would have a stronger legacy. But as it is it has been neglected in favor of elaborate rigging which I guess can be credited to Steven Spielberg who seemingly lost his passion to the story after The Lost World which showed plenty of uninspired handling by the director in question.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 05, 2010, 06:48:38 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6t2oeXM3Ww
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 06, 2010, 01:31:57 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 05, 2010, 03:17:02 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 05, 2010, 02:58:37 AM
Quote from: Puks on Mar 03, 2010, 10:45:13 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 03, 2010, 10:25:15 PM
That's what happens when you consult with Jack Horner.

A paleontologist approved of a scene where the Spino kills a T-Rex with one bite of its fishing jaws?

Jesus.

Never mind that, the only thing worse than that was the way the Spino did it. Watch closely, he actually bends the neck sideways and snaps it.

Since when did dinosaurs learn jiu-jitsu?

Oh jeez what do you call the jiu-jitsu move again where you bite the neck of your opponent and kill them? I forget.

It was practically a choke. It looked stupid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alexa Chung on Mar 06, 2010, 03:17:10 AM
I got raped by Jurassic Park 3 and gave birth to Carnosaur 2.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SiL on Mar 06, 2010, 03:20:23 AM
Seems like a fair trade-off.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 06, 2010, 06:05:40 AM
Quote from: Alexa Chung on Mar 06, 2010, 03:17:10 AM
I got raped by Jurassic Park 3 and gave birth to Carnosaur 2.

The implications of that statement are massive and terrifying. :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Mar 06, 2010, 12:45:49 PM
Please, Jurassic Park 3 is nowhere near that bad even if it's storyline is merely a skeleton. Carnosaur on the other hand is a pile of lifeless chalk on the ground with bits of pigeon dung smeared on it. Do not compare the two. If JPIV indeed has the story of "Supersoldier Homocraptors given guns" I'll admit then that it's fair game if that's all that it was leading to. Now it's more of a story that had JP-type potential if handled accordingly but never grew the balls required to support that potential.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 06, 2010, 01:03:01 PM
God damn it the C.G.I is flawless. Here a couple of random screen shots that just show how realistic they look.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi50.tinypic.com%2F33wv1fr.jpg&hash=7f3e877f280f7816d5747dcbe1b271338753c5b9)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Mar 06, 2010, 03:33:40 PM
It's the best CGI that I have ever seen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Mar 06, 2010, 03:51:27 PM
it looks real because the lightning, the sound, the movement, everything was perfectly made and fits with the enviroment they are put into.

any movie could get results like that with time, money and dedication, like district  9 at the very end, you cant tell christopher is either a CGI or a puppet. it feels real
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Mar 06, 2010, 05:39:15 PM
The CGI fits in better when you plan the scenes to make the animation enhance them. This worked in Jurassic Park because the animation merely enhances the story and not vice versa. We don't see works like that often because in most other production it is the story that tries to enhance the computer simulation to the audience(and fails in that). You cannot make reality work like that with simulations. You must build those simulations to work around the reality. A good script is a good start. It's easy to make commercials. It's hard to make movies.

Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 05, 2010, 06:48:38 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6t2oeXM3Ww
"I bring you scientists, you bring a rock star."  ;) 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 06, 2010, 07:31:20 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 06, 2010, 01:03:01 PM
God damn it the C.G.I is flawless. Here a couple of random screen shots that just show how realistic they look.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi50.tinypic.com%2F33wv1fr.jpg&hash=7f3e877f280f7816d5747dcbe1b271338753c5b9)

That wasn't Lex there hanging from the roof, actually. It was a stunt double, and the used computers to but Lex's face on the double's. It was seamless!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 06, 2010, 11:26:36 PM
The first shot, when the Rex's breaks through the fence between the two SUV's looked so damn real!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 07, 2010, 05:00:15 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 06, 2010, 01:03:01 PM
God damn it the C.G.I is flawless. Here a couple of random screen shots that just show how realistic they look.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi50.tinypic.com%2F33wv1fr.jpg&hash=7f3e877f280f7816d5747dcbe1b271338753c5b9)

And the ironic thing is, they still look better than most of the stuff we get with more recent technology. TLW improved on JP's work in every way possible, and the dinosaurs didn't look like walking CG images thankfully.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 07, 2010, 06:43:21 AM
I know; it's really weird. That was one of the earliest films to use CGI in such a manner, and it's still one of the most convincing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dark Passenger on Mar 07, 2010, 11:44:53 AM
when you see such good cgi like that from jurrasic park and then you go and see something like transformers it makes you wonder what happened?....doestn seem liek theyve improved on the cgi at all
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Mar 07, 2010, 12:10:56 PM
Whats more astounding about what JP acheived was how advanced the CGI it used was compared to other movies. It wasnt a gradual thing, it was just suddenly wham, look what weve done. Before JP we had water like CGI effects in The Abyss and similar effects for the T1000 in T2. There was CGI used in Death Becomes Her, and some CGI fire in Backdraft. We had a 10 second glimpse of a CGI character in Young Sherlock Holmes.  It was used here and there in the films and not usually the main focus and then all of a sudden we a get film which uses photorealistic creatures that nobody had ever seen before. I was too young to appreciate it at the time but looking back that must of blew peoples minds. I mean hell if it was made 5 years earlier it probably would have been stop motion.

Edit: look at Alien 3. Love the film but some of its effects are well ropey. The compositing and use of CGI is horrible and then JP was released a year later. Truly mind boggling.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 07, 2010, 02:13:50 PM
Man I love reading fellow fans of JP expressing their joy of how awesome the C.G.I was, so here are some more to wet your whistle.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi46.tinypic.com%2F201qw2.jpg&hash=d1ff57eb3c7e33f8cf4da7967a1ed88a39e7fdb4)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Corporal Lewis Hicks on Mar 07, 2010, 03:53:34 PM
Its amazing stuff I love this film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 07, 2010, 04:00:35 PM
Quote from: Corporal Lewis Hicks on Mar 07, 2010, 03:53:34 PM
Its amazing stuff I love this film.

Here's the official trailer of the Lost World from 1997, still gives me goosebumps!  :o

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIkOdrJGNy0
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Mar 07, 2010, 04:14:29 PM
That trailer is amazing. I still remember seeing it the first time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Corporal Lewis Hicks on Mar 07, 2010, 04:21:43 PM
That film is amazing. I got a copy of it off of Amazon last week. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 07, 2010, 06:06:29 PM
Can't wait for the blu-ray later this year! :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Corporal Lewis Hicks on Mar 08, 2010, 01:13:16 AM
Just watched JP And Brings back all the memories from when I was a Kid good times. :')
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Mar 08, 2010, 08:28:30 AM
Quote from: Dark Passenger on Mar 07, 2010, 11:44:53 AM
when you see such good cgi like that from jurrasic park and then you go and see something like transformers it makes you wonder what happened?....doestn seem liek theyve improved on the cgi at all
It's been abused to hell in search for similar success to that with Jurassic Park. That sadly turns the genre into an expensive commercial(come on, what target audience do you think they made Transformers for). A flashy special effect does not a good movie make. When you can't perceive something as an effect it enhances the experience. Jurassic Park somewhat succeeds with that and is the way movie special effects should infact be handled. You don't enhance the effect with the movie but the movie USING the effect. There's no charm in a magic trick when it's all done with a computer(unless you're talking about a cartoon such as Toy Story).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 08, 2010, 02:40:26 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 07, 2010, 06:06:29 PM
Can't wait for the blu-ray later this year! :P

Are they confirmed for release?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 08, 2010, 02:43:51 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 08, 2010, 02:40:26 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 07, 2010, 06:06:29 PM
Can't wait for the blu-ray later this year! :P

Are they confirmed for release?

Last I heard the trilogy was being released along with JAWS and Saving Private Ryan sometime in 2010.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 08, 2010, 02:46:31 PM
About time too. These films would look amazing in HD ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 08, 2010, 10:00:02 PM
QuoteAnd? It was still stupid.

Never could really fathom why people cried so much when a T-Rex gets pwned.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Mar 08, 2010, 10:05:47 PM
Quote from: SM on Mar 08, 2010, 10:00:02 PM
QuoteAnd? It was still stupid.

Never could really fathom why people cried so much when a T-Rex gets pwned.

Same reason people cry when an Alien isn't portrayed "correctly", or when a Predator doesn't act or look like a real predator. People don't like seeing creatures and characters they grew up with getting owned.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Mar 08, 2010, 10:13:53 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Mar 04, 2010, 02:34:03 PM
The thing about JP3 is that it had a heavily emphasis on Raptors. The Lost World had the long grass scene and the abandoned station, and that was it. Mostly the Rex's movie. JP3 used Raptors way more than the Spino.

And yet i think the raptors portrayal and the scenes involving them where weaker than their appearances in JP and LW. Shame.
Quote from: Remonster on Mar 08, 2010, 10:05:47 PM
Quote from: SM on Mar 08, 2010, 10:00:02 PM
QuoteAnd? It was still stupid.

Never could really fathom why people cried so much when a T-Rex gets pwned.

Same reason people cry when an Alien isn't portrayed "correctly", or when a Predator doesn't act or look like a real predator. People don't like seeing creatures and characters they grew up with getting owned.

I agree. I remember watching it thinking, whaaaaaaaat the T-Rex is dead? No way. I was gutted. Its similar to the Newborn killing the Queen with payoff and no lead up. Perhaps if the inital attack on the plane was by the t-rex and the following scenes leading upto the fight. When the group stumbles upon the dead dinosaur it should have been the spinosaur that reared its head and then came out and fought the T-Rex. That way the audience would of just had their fix of the T Rex and then they would get a scene that makes them think "shit that thing just killed a t rex". It would of been a much better introduction and the payoff at the end of the fight wouldve been much better.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 08, 2010, 11:10:15 PM
This is how I see the trilogy.

Jurassic Park - My favourite film of all time and a masterpiece.
The Lost World: Jurassic Park - A worthy sequel and one hell of a ride.
Jurassic Park /// - A good popcorn movie.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 09, 2010, 12:25:05 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 08, 2010, 11:10:15 PM
This is how I see the trilogy.

Jurassic Park - My favourite film of all time and a masterpiece.
The Lost World: Jurassic Park - A worthy sequel and one hell of a ride.
Jurassic Park /// - A good popcorn movie. A godawful abomination.

Fixed that for you. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Mar 09, 2010, 12:29:43 AM
Was it really that bad?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 09, 2010, 12:32:16 AM
Not nearly as bad as a dinosaur running around San Diego.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 09, 2010, 12:32:48 AM
Quote from: Skinner on Mar 09, 2010, 12:29:43 AM
Was it really that bad?

No, I was just having a little fun. It doesn't hold a candle to the other films, though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 09, 2010, 12:34:54 AM
 :D

JP3 was pretty bad.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Mar 09, 2010, 12:36:04 AM
It's grown on me. Didn't think it was particularly good back in '01, but now I think it's much better than Lost World.

Feels far less bloated.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 09, 2010, 12:40:09 AM
The thing about Lost World, was that there were so many characters and everything going on. A new island, InGen, etc.

And I liked that.

What I hated about JP3, was after Cooper and Nash died, it was almost predictable of who was going to live. I never felt the Kirby's would die, Alan wouldn't certainly die.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 09, 2010, 12:42:23 AM
Same as how Ian, Sarah, the kid and Vince Vaughn weren't likely to die.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 09, 2010, 12:44:35 AM
Quote from: TJ Doc on Mar 09, 2010, 12:36:04 AM
It's grown on me. Didn't think it was particularly good back in '01, but now I think it's much better than Lost World.

Feels far less bloated.

I'm sorry, TJ. We've been good internet-friends for several months, but I'm afraid I have to kill you now. :'(

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg692.imageshack.us%2Fimg692%2F3710%2Fcryingspacemarines.jpg&hash=9af7bfe40203b847964a6e13c884fd1f387a3730)

Please forgive me!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 09, 2010, 12:44:54 AM
But I didn't know who on InGen was going to die. I thought Roland was going to die, but he didn't when Owen f**ked him over with his shotgun.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Mar 09, 2010, 12:48:10 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Mar 09, 2010, 12:40:09 AM
The thing about Lost World, was that there were so many characters and everything going on. A new island, InGen, etc.

And I liked that.

What I hated about JP3, was after Cooper and Nash died, it was almost predictable of who was going to live. I never felt the Kirby's would die, Alan wouldn't certainly die.

What SM said.

See, I prefer JP3's more personal feel. It felt good to get back to a smaller number of characters after LW's humongous cast. It means there's far more room for drama (which JP3 did have... in small doses).

Plus JP3 doesn't feature Raptors getting gymnasticated. And also...



Quote from: SpaceMarines on Mar 09, 2010, 12:44:35 AM
I'm sorry, TJ. We've been good internet-friends for several months, but I'm afraid I have to kill you now. :'(

http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/3710/cryingspacemarines.jpg

Please forgive me!

Space? What are you...

NO WAIT! *shotgun blast*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 09, 2010, 12:50:14 AM
 :'(

Was the gasoline really worth it?

R.I.P. TJ Doc
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 09, 2010, 12:53:23 AM
No, I did it out of honour and principle, not gasoline. Although, I suppose it would be a shame to let all his go to waste...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 09, 2010, 12:56:05 AM
"guzzaline"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Mar 09, 2010, 01:11:32 AM
TJ!!!

YOU WILL PAY FOR THIS!!!

*grabs TJ's body and carries it to the pillowfight thread*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 09, 2010, 03:24:59 AM
Quote from: SM on Mar 09, 2010, 12:32:16 AM
Not nearly as bad as a dinosaur running around San Diego.

It was worse. At least dinosaur in San Diego was fun for me. Spino offing Rexy and then having the film end an hour later...not so fun.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 09, 2010, 03:37:10 AM
And of course nothing happened in that hour.  No pteradactyls or anything...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 09, 2010, 03:46:10 AM
It was boring. It ended too quickly. The only sequence in the film that really got my attention was the Pteranodon sequence because it was totally fresh.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 09, 2010, 03:51:15 AM
Yes it did end too quickly.  And rather ridiculously with the whole navy showing up. But better to get out while the goings good than drag out a King Kong homage.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 09, 2010, 03:52:19 AM
The plot also felt forced for me. Really, after all the death and destruction on the island, you're going to go paragliding near it?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 09, 2010, 03:54:45 AM
Because of course things like that NEVER happen in real life...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 09, 2010, 03:55:16 AM
Quote from: SM on Mar 09, 2010, 03:51:15 AM
Yes it did end too quickly.  And rather ridiculously with the whole navy showing up. But better to get out while the goings good than drag out a King Kong homage.

The going went down hill as soon as the Rex was killed.

Yes. I am upset.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 09, 2010, 03:58:35 AM
Quote from: SM on Mar 09, 2010, 03:54:45 AM
Because of course things like that NEVER happen in real life...

You're right. Dinosaurs have been extinct for millions of years. So it doesn't happen in real life.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 09, 2010, 04:03:46 AM
Ditto the first two flicks then.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Mar 09, 2010, 09:54:55 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 09, 2010, 03:24:59 AM
Quote from: SM on Mar 09, 2010, 12:32:16 AM
Not nearly as bad as a dinosaur running around San Diego.

It was worse. At least dinosaur in San Diego was fun for me. Spino offing Rexy and then having the film end an hour later...not so fun.
Exactly, more than one huge carnivore is double the fun. Yet they basically force fed us the Spino as "the only king". That's the type of bison coprolite the T-Rex suffered from prior to JP. This is where I infact have to disagree about the San Diego part, it just isn't something "fresh" the JP franchise would deserve. That's basically ripping off other individual movies. It's not like the movie was even a loyal adaptation to the novel which didn't even have the city rampage.  ::)

I personally feel both sequels have problems. They just seem to ignore what made Jurassic Park unique to begin with which makes the "expansion" inconsistent. It's not Random Dinosaur Action but dinosaurs for grownups. Spielberg seemingly no longer respects that(not that he ever did but there would be potential starting from the first film if it it had been allowed to mature).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Mar 09, 2010, 10:42:00 AM
As i was watching Jurassic Park yesterday again, i have ALWAYS wondered, How is it, that the Rex comes through the fence from the woods and 2 minutues later the Rex pushes the car over the edge downwards? How come there is a canyon (dont know the correct english word atm) all the sudden? Or is it the other side? Still its a confusing scene... im sure this has been asked 100 times :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 09, 2010, 10:46:03 AM
It's a hill. Explanation here (http://www.jplegacy.org/home.php?load=jurassicpark/ffjpking.shtml). :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Mar 09, 2010, 11:22:52 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Mar 09, 2010, 10:46:03 AM
It's a hill. Explanation here (http://www.jplegacy.org/home.php?load=jurassicpark/ffjpking.shtml). :)

good god that was long winded and boring as hell. it still didnt make sense when i got to the end because whoever wrote that babbled on about too much about tiny unimportant details like plants and id forgotten what had come before it. Simple answer, from where the Rex broke through the fence at ground level the ground on the paddock side must have a steep hill which slopes down leaving a massive concrete cliff under the fence. This is where the car gets pushed over.

It doesnt show you this and so it is confusing but thats the way ive always looked at it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 09, 2010, 11:48:30 AM
Quote from: SM on Mar 09, 2010, 03:51:15 AM
Yes it did end too quickly.  And rather ridiculously with the whole navy showing up. But better to get out while the goings good than drag out a King Kong homage.

The ending of the lost world was exactly what fans wanted dinos on the mainland and who better than the tyrannosaur?! It's what people wanted and it's a classic Spielberg ending he's got you hooked for two hours and he'll doing something amazing and you accept it because he's got you hooked. Other examples of this are: The shark jumping on the boat in Jaws, bikes flying in E.T, T-Rex rescue in the first JP, and the tank blowing up from a pistol blast in saving private Ryan (granted its the planes which blow it up but for a moment anyway he makes you believe the unbelievable.)

I honestly don't get why some people hate the idea of an ending where the t-rex is running amok in San Diego it was an awesome sequence and ending to a great sequel!



Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Lie on Mar 09, 2010, 11:50:35 AM
All the scenes that didnt have the Spinosaurus were not worth watching
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 09, 2010, 11:53:01 AM
Quote from: Lie1295 on Mar 09, 2010, 11:50:35 AM
All the scenes that didnt have the Spinosaurus were not worth watching

So not a fan of Jurassic Park & The Lost World?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Lie on Mar 09, 2010, 12:08:33 PM
Yeah I was a fan but It one of the few thing I grew out of I still have the DVD of the film and if another one comes ou i'll download it. As for Jurassic park one, I watched it nonstop as a child and number two that was a good film.

Me and Jurassic park are at that point in our relationship where we just understand each other ya'know.

I never have been good at wording my feelings
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Mar 09, 2010, 05:52:31 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 09, 2010, 11:48:30 AM
Quote from: SM on Mar 09, 2010, 03:51:15 AM
Yes it did end too quickly.  And rather ridiculously with the whole navy showing up. But better to get out while the goings good than drag out a King Kong homage.
I honestly don't get why some people hate the idea of an ending where the t-rex is running amok in San Diego it was an awesome sequence and ending to a great sequel!
Because it only helps demystify the whole thing. As much as they wanted it I don't see the fans *cough*morelikecasualdumbassfilmgoers*cough*truly knowing what they wanted. Nor did Spielberg by actually giving them that. You are right about it sadly being his common style as a film-maker to pull all the silliest punches near the end regardless of what it may cause in the aftermath. In some cases this works(Jaws, E.T) but in other cases it only hinders what may be coming later(following Jurassic Park installments). He's often too eager to serve the low denominators of the audience that he may not understand that the consequences can be very bleak to the consistency of a concept as good as Jurassic Park has once been. Spielberg almost seems like an overgrown child in how he treats his film concepts. This sadly has prevented Jurassic Park from maturing(if you read the book you'd know that the Crichton version is very dark in nature). That maturity should be allowed to be reached. That means better human psychology. TLW is laughable in how it makes the heroes more criminal in nature than the actual bad guys who merely seem like arrogant looters at best. And JP3........*laugh*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 09, 2010, 10:21:46 PM
QuoteI honestly don't get why some people hate the idea of an ending where the t-rex is running amok in San Diego it was an awesome sequence and ending to a great sequel!

Go back a few pages.  I'm sure I've detailed all my gripes with the end of JP2 several times.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Mar 09, 2010, 10:53:32 PM
am i the only one that thinks of a documental style movie like District 9 about the world's view on jurassic park and the debate about what to do with the islands?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alexa Chung on Mar 09, 2010, 11:11:56 PM
You mean for the first twenty minutes until it drops that pretense and just becomes a bunch of dinosaurs eating people and getting shot at?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Mar 09, 2010, 11:38:44 PM
more or less  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 09, 2010, 11:52:24 PM
Has anyone else noticed that this thread is no longer about Jurassic Park IV, but the Jurassic Park series in general? Whatever, it's still damn fun to be able to talk about two of my favourite franchises on one forum.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Mar 09, 2010, 11:59:39 PM
I have been successfully regenerated! And on the above note -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=biqmRDlz1JI
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 10, 2010, 12:02:50 AM
Yay! I'm adding that to my favourites! :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 10, 2010, 03:59:27 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Mar 09, 2010, 11:52:24 PM
Has anyone else noticed that this thread is no longer about Jurassic Park IV, but the Jurassic Park series in general? Whatever, it's still damn fun to be able to talk about two of my favourite franchises on one forum.

Hardly surprising since we haven't heard much about the fourth film in quite some time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Mar 10, 2010, 08:45:08 AM
All thanks to it's lazy handling.

And yes, a "mockumentary" would work really well. Have it narrated by Sam Neill's character and mostly concentrate on the dinosaur species of Site B living their lives in the island all while harassed by an incompetent documentary crew that would sometimes also serve as prey to the Raptors for instance. There could also be emphasis on how the tropical environment is affecting the old human constructions and how the dinosaurs exploit these artificial shelters.

I made this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za5C88PzIDA (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za5C88PzIDA)
EDIT: Sorry about the link guys, YouTube can often be real *bleep*ed up.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 10, 2010, 04:05:59 PM
You made a film you immediately took down?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 10, 2010, 05:14:42 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 10, 2010, 03:59:27 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Mar 09, 2010, 11:52:24 PM
Has anyone else noticed that this thread is no longer about Jurassic Park IV, but the Jurassic Park series in general? Whatever, it's still damn fun to be able to talk about two of my favourite franchises on one forum.

Hardly surprising since we haven't heard much about the fourth film in quite some time.

Don't forget the Joe Johnston said not three months ago it was going to new places and it might be the start of a new trilogy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Mar 10, 2010, 11:14:11 PM
I hate it when film studios try to do that. why cant they take it one movie at a time and go from there instead of coming up with a big overall plan. It just smacks of "where not bothered if they are actually any good we just want to keep the franchise going to make maximum wonga".
Hell JPIII took a hell of alot less at the box office than its prequels and got panned by critics so surely they should see how a fourth movie pans out before getting high and mighty and ahead of themselves.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 10, 2010, 11:24:39 PM
Well, they might not use any islands anymore, so now we get 2 hours of a T-Rex running around a city!  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Mar 10, 2010, 11:32:39 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Mar 10, 2010, 11:24:39 PM
Well, they might not use any islands anymore, so now we get 2 hours of a T-Rex running around a city!  ;D

and then off into space for the sequels. Zero G raptors with teleportation abilities and heads that look like hammerhead sharks.

Oh wait that was Dino Crisis 3. Worst finale to a game trilogy ever considering how fantastic the first 2 games where. I didnt know wether to laugh or cry when the final boss was a
Spoiler
3 headed tyranosaur mutant clinging to the outside of a space ship attacking the hull
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 10, 2010, 11:40:45 PM
QuoteI hate it when film studios try to do that. why cant they take it one movie at a time and go from there instead of coming up with a big overall plan.

Because they have a story that's going to take more than one movie to tell (Star Wars, Matrix, BTTF).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Mar 10, 2010, 11:54:18 PM
Not in these cases though. They just want to boost a franchise back into life and stick out as many sequels as possible. It doesnt sound like they have a trilogy planned, it suggest more that they are just going another direction so it keeps it open for sequels. And not many trilogies actually start out with the intention of being a trilogy or with the entire story planned out. Sure films like Star Wars did but The Matrix certainly didnt. They might have had ideas for a sequel but it wasnt planned. The Matrix works as a standalone film, its sequels dont. There are so many trilogies where the second and third parts have been thought of afterwards and they dont really work as a standalone film like the first did. Pirates Of The Caribbean and Back To The Future for example. Some work some dont.

A 3 movie story arc planned for Jurassic Park as a self contained trilogy? I doubt it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 11, 2010, 12:02:53 AM
Everyone should sign this! Bring Jurassic Park back to theatres!

http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/re-release-jurassic-park-in-theaters.html
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 11, 2010, 12:03:25 AM
QuoteSure films like Star Wars did but The Matrix certainly didnt.

Yes it did.  They just made the first film self contained in the same way Lucas did with Star Wars so it could stand alone.

QuoteThe Matrix works as a standalone film, its sequels dont.

Same as Star Wars.

Either way, if you have a successful franchise - why not milk it?  Every studio does this and punters would lap up another JP film.  And one of the best things about it is they can go in any direction because there is no overarching narrative.  You don't even need all the core characters back - you can make do with just one if need be.  And after Lost World, you could bring back Sarah, Nick or Roland quite easily.  Even Lex and Tim from the first film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 11, 2010, 02:36:13 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 11, 2010, 12:02:53 AM
Everyone should sign this! Bring Jurassic Park back to theatres!

http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/re-release-jurassic-park-in-theaters.html

Thanks for the link, signed it :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 11, 2010, 02:43:14 AM
So have I. I hope it works! :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 11, 2010, 02:44:42 AM
When do internet petitions ever NOT work?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 11, 2010, 02:45:38 AM
Not often, but, hell, I love Jurassic Park too much not to sign it! :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 11, 2010, 02:56:06 AM
Not like I lost anything by signing it. So whatever.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 11, 2010, 02:57:18 AM
You could've spent those seconds it took to do something more productive though.  Like scratching your balls.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 11, 2010, 02:59:02 AM
They didn't need scratching.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 11, 2010, 03:01:35 AM
Yeah but they will at some point and you could've pre-scratched them.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 11, 2010, 03:11:24 AM
Naaaaaaaah.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 11, 2010, 08:57:29 AM
Quote from: SM on Mar 11, 2010, 03:01:35 AM
Yeah but they will at some point and you could've pre-scratched them.

If you're so concerned with DoomRulz ball scratching antics you could do it for him.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Mar 11, 2010, 01:48:35 PM
...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 11, 2010, 03:57:34 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 11, 2010, 08:57:29 AM
Quote from: SM on Mar 11, 2010, 03:01:35 AM
Yeah but they will at some point and you could've pre-scratched them.

If you're so concerned with DoomRulz ball scratching antics you could do it for him.

Ok then, uh...

Let's get back on topic shall we :P my nuts can be discussed elsewhere.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 11, 2010, 03:59:20 PM
Yeeaaahhh Jurassic park!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Mar 11, 2010, 04:19:53 PM
YAY!

....

so.... dinosaurs with guns....

yep
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Mar 11, 2010, 05:17:31 PM
Wait! Hang on.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 11, 2010, 03:57:34 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 11, 2010, 08:57:29 AM
Quote from: SM on Mar 11, 2010, 03:01:35 AM
Yeah but they will at some point and you could've pre-scratched them.

If you're so concerned with DoomRulz ball scratching antics you could do it for him.

Ok then, uh...

Let's get back on topic shall we :P my nuts can be discussed elsewhere.

Where?!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 11, 2010, 05:33:18 PM
Where would you like?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Mar 11, 2010, 05:34:56 PM
Oh I just... nevermind.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 11, 2010, 05:36:33 PM
So to keep the ball moving. Out of the Jurassic Park trilogy what is your favourite scene and why?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 11, 2010, 05:53:26 PM
T.Rex attack in the first film. Intense, scary, exciting, and a lawyer is eaten off a toilet seat.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on Mar 11, 2010, 06:02:35 PM
The moment when Grant and Satler first see the Brachiosaurus. It's magical!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 11, 2010, 06:31:18 PM
Mine is the dinner scene from the first film. I just love the debate and the relationship between Malcolm and Hammond. But it could be the climax where the tyrannosaur saves the day. MAN I set the question without an answer myself!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Mar 11, 2010, 06:42:42 PM
Any scene with Malcom in the first film is great.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 11, 2010, 07:40:23 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 11, 2010, 05:36:33 PM
So to keep the ball moving. Out of the Jurassic Park trilogy what is your favourite scene and why?

-When Carter got stepped on by the T-Rex and was stuck to its foot.  ;D (Lost World)

- When the Rex broke through the fences between the two SUVs. (Jurassic Park)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 11, 2010, 08:07:09 PM
The meal scene in the first film with Dodgson and Nedry was awesome too, if not just for that squeaky laugh XD
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 11, 2010, 08:10:57 PM
"Dodgson! We got Dodgeson here!"

I love that line.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Mar 11, 2010, 09:19:33 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4iTHzF2Qvk

Heh-heh.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Corporal Lewis Hicks on Mar 11, 2010, 09:29:59 PM
Lmao, WTF! haa
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 11, 2010, 09:32:20 PM
LMAO!

Spoiler
At the end of the video, I love when he squeals!!
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Mar 11, 2010, 09:53:23 PM
that shit is what youtube was invented for. haha brilliant. buckled me that did
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: BUGZ on Mar 11, 2010, 10:14:42 PM
LOL - that video is hillarious!!!

WoW! Mega man dino noob!

Bri ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Johnny Handsome on Mar 11, 2010, 10:15:22 PM
Quote from: TJ Doc on Mar 11, 2010, 09:19:33 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4iTHzF2Qvk

Heh-heh.
0:50 - 0:57 is hilarious  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 11, 2010, 10:18:47 PM
That actually made me tear up I was laughing so much, good find! Oh the joys a fat man can bring...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Mar 11, 2010, 10:23:16 PM
ahhh that brings memories. wonderful ones that is :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Mar 11, 2010, 10:30:33 PM
Indeed. Hilarious to type the least. In fact, if it weren't for That Yellow Alien and Nobody originally bringing that vid to the site's attention back in July (http://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=990.780) (there's another remix as well), I just don't know what life would have been like without it...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 11, 2010, 10:36:47 PM
I love that! Thank you TJ! :D

As for favourite scene, either when the T Rex first escapes, or any scene with Muldoon, specifically when he's stalking the raptor, only to find out he himself was the prey.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Mar 11, 2010, 10:43:45 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TO5wryDdEI0
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Mar 11, 2010, 10:51:51 PM
I think it ate his face.  :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 11, 2010, 10:55:30 PM
I does make me very sad-face, but it is just such a well-done scene.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 11, 2010, 11:01:25 PM
I love the hiss, that the Raptor does when it pokes its head through the bushes. It adds so much more tension.

Almost like the Raptor is saying..."I found you!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Mar 11, 2010, 11:08:00 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Mar 11, 2010, 11:01:25 PM
Almost like the Raptor is saying..."I found you!"

Or maybe...

Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 05, 2010, 08:22:18 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prgm4eKq6d4

:D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 11, 2010, 11:10:50 PM
HEY!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 11, 2010, 11:25:29 PM
Anyone ever see the deleted scenes of the Lost World?

Roland kicks the crap out of someone!  8)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IauEY2XoMR8
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 11, 2010, 11:27:16 PM
Yeah, I have the special editions DVDs of the first two. Roland almost equates Muldoon in sheer badassery.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 11, 2010, 11:31:41 PM
I love that Roland scene, wish they would have kept it!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Mar 11, 2010, 11:44:21 PM
I wish we saw him take down the Rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Mar 11, 2010, 11:52:01 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Mar 11, 2010, 11:25:29 PM
Anyone ever see the deleted scenes of the Lost World?

Roland kicks the crap out of someone!  8)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IauEY2XoMR8


EPIC WIN.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Mar 12, 2010, 12:49:53 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TsXX1JCtpA
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Mar 12, 2010, 12:51:53 AM
Oh god!  :D

But I really think someone should do a similar one where his head explodes at the end.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Corporal Lewis Hicks on Mar 12, 2010, 12:54:45 AM
Lmao, that Alan Grant one was some funny shit.

Roland For the win. I got the box set with all the bonus stuff.  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 12, 2010, 01:03:55 AM
It almost sounds like he's talking about James Cameron/Avatar  ;D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7NEdbJ3ugE
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 12, 2010, 01:09:58 AM
 :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 12, 2010, 01:43:09 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Mar 12, 2010, 01:03:55 AM
It almost sounds like he's talking about James Cameron/Avatar  ;D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7NEdbJ3ugE

Seriously, how the hell does Jeff Goldblum just always get things right? WIN!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 12, 2010, 01:45:13 AM
He does hate it though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 12, 2010, 02:06:33 AM
I really need to go and watch that movie again! There's just too many great scenes! :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Mar 12, 2010, 02:28:05 AM
I think I'll watch Jurassic Park tomorrow night.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Mar 12, 2010, 08:26:52 AM
Sorry about the link guys, YouTube can be real messed up often in it's copyright bullshiznit. Here's the video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za5C88PzIDA
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 12, 2010, 03:02:58 PM
The video speaks the truth just bring back the t-rex (even alongside the Spino) and don't introduce anymore. Just use what you've got and make one hell of a story with them.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 12, 2010, 04:18:51 PM
Said it before and I'll say it again: I want more dinosaurs. Enough of the Raptor/Rex continuum.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Corporal Lewis Hicks on Mar 12, 2010, 04:22:25 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 12, 2010, 04:18:51 PM
Said it before and I'll say it again: I want more dinosaurs. Enough of the Raptor/Rex continuum.

Rex has to stay.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 12, 2010, 04:25:14 PM
Not saying he shouldn't. But don't make him the focal point along with the raptors.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Corporal Lewis Hicks on Mar 12, 2010, 04:33:42 PM
Oh yeah thats cool. Just dont make him a pussy like in JP3. . . And yeah cut down on the Raptors.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Mar 12, 2010, 06:23:17 PM
Quote from: TJ Doc on Mar 11, 2010, 11:08:00 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Mar 11, 2010, 11:01:25 PM
Almost like the Raptor is saying..."I found you!"

Or maybe...

Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 05, 2010, 08:22:18 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prgm4eKq6d4




Quote from: TJ Doc on Mar 11, 2010, 09:19:33 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4iTHzF2Qvk

Heh-heh.
Hilarious!

:D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 12, 2010, 09:17:07 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNZqbdoUji8
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Mar 12, 2010, 09:30:37 PM
Good old fart humor!  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 13, 2010, 04:46:04 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Mar 12, 2010, 09:17:07 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNZqbdoUji8

And to top it all off, the Dodgson music playing at the end :D awesome!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 13, 2010, 04:56:16 AM
Quote from: Nychus on Mar 12, 2010, 08:26:52 AM
Sorry about the link guys, YouTube can be real messed up often in it's copyright bullshiznit. Here's the video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za5C88PzIDA

Well said!

Quote from: First Blood on Mar 12, 2010, 09:17:07 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNZqbdoUji8

:)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Mar 13, 2010, 10:15:57 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Mar 12, 2010, 09:17:07 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNZqbdoUji8
Makes sense doesn't it?  ;) ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 13, 2010, 03:46:11 PM
I don't think I've come across a movie besides Jurassic Park that has had these many short spoofs made about it lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Mar 13, 2010, 03:53:35 PM
I don't know... The Dark Knight has a rather large number of parodies.  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 13, 2010, 06:06:21 PM
But those are different. They make fun of something that was already a little humorous to begin with (Batman's voice). These make us laugh at things we took seriously. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Mar 13, 2010, 06:12:23 PM
Wayne Knight aside, yes, I suppose.  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 13, 2010, 06:12:57 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUTW7YKytyA

  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Mar 13, 2010, 06:13:32 PM
Oh dear...  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 13, 2010, 06:14:27 PM
The one that always gets me besides Nedry's laugh, is Nedry KOing himself on the car door XD. Seriously, how the f**k did that even happen?? Did his arm bounce off the chair and hit him too hard, or did he just hit his head harder than it looked?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 13, 2010, 06:14:45 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Mar 13, 2010, 06:12:57 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUTW7YKytyA

  :D

:D Oh, the immature child withing me has just died from laughter.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Mar 13, 2010, 08:30:29 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 13, 2010, 06:14:27 PM
The one that always gets me besides Nedry's laugh, is Nedry KOing himself on the car door XD. Seriously, how the f**k did that even happen?? Did his arm bounce off the chair and hit him too hard, or did he just hit his head harder than it looked?
It did help that he didn't see *fart* for having his eyes incapacitated by corrosive spit. Really, for being just a "little brother" to the bigger ones(most likely a juvenile) that Dilophosaurus is badass. I often had problems sleeping as a child when wondering whether that cooing little gremlin was going to enter my room and start spaying lethal chemicals at me while trying to mind*bleep* me with a colorful cowl. This thing should definitely make a comeback in the next movie. Pit him against a Raptor and see what comes up from that. They should also include an adult version. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Mar 13, 2010, 08:40:32 PM
 Dilophosaurus vs Raptor? Sounds bada$$.  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 13, 2010, 09:28:57 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcontent.ytmnd.com%2Fcontent%2F0%2F6%2F5%2F0650e1adc6e6fd243b9a7de78d062323.jpg&hash=a57c629cd3485b3585f6940fcf0ea607da61e336)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on Mar 13, 2010, 09:55:01 PM
Well, let's see.

Dilophosaurus:
+ 6 meters long
+ intimidating frail
+ blinding, paralyzing venom spitted at distance
- less intelligent
- more primitive and less agile
 
Velociraptor (Deinonychus) antirrhopus
+ fast and more efficiant killer
+ intelligent, pack behaviour
+ deadly claws
- smaller
- no attack from distance

Question is - why the f**k we haven't seen this yet in a movie?
I already have images in my head and boy, are they awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 13, 2010, 10:00:15 PM
Well in reality a Dilophosaurus would slaughter a Velociraptor, but you know...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 13, 2010, 10:05:56 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tvgasm.com%2Fshows%2Fimages%2FNashville%2FSneakPeek%2Fdilophosaurus.jpg&hash=7467d9d1883fa40b1f262ebb34cbbcf90d54ffcb)
Badass.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 13, 2010, 10:11:04 PM
This is badass.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sdnhm.org%2Fexhibits%2Ffeathered%2Fimages%2Fdei_head.jpg&hash=66debe240f2444cd529314721ffe7b5d5a1e4ebd)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DrHobo on Mar 13, 2010, 10:11:30 PM
QuoteIn the film version, Dilophosaurus has a retractable neck frill around its neck (much like a frill-necked lizard), and spits blinding poison, aiming for the eyes to blind and paralyze its prey (much like a spitting cobra). There is no evidence to support either the frill or the venom spitting,[13]  which was acknowledged by Crichton as creative license.

And I also learned that the real Velociraptor was tiny :[

I'd like to see Allosaurus in the next film.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia-2.web.britannica.com%2Feb-media%2F51%2F8051-004-9CFC87E4.jpg&hash=04bbc1e8c5cd98140f0592b28f7aa10e6ceadc7e)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Mar 13, 2010, 11:56:28 PM
I'd like to see Carnotaurus since it was in The Lost World novel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Mar 14, 2010, 09:08:02 AM
They're both badass. Besides, the one we saw kill Newman was more of a juvenile scale so I doubt a single Velociraptor would have any problems fighting it. But if it's parent were around that Raptor would need it's entire pack to do anything as an adult Dilophosaurus is closer to a Ceratosaur(same family) in scale. Nedry was in fact torn apart by a Dilophosaur of such scale in the novel(with a gruesome description) which obviously didn't serve Wayne Knights funnyness in the film thus they had him killed by a younglin.

Carnotaurus would also be interesting knowing that in the novel it could camouflage itself to a spot where it could then attack an unsuspecting prey.

Allosaurus would only make sense if they had it hunt in packs(a perfect target, Spinosaurus).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 14, 2010, 10:54:04 AM
But why bring in Allosaurus it'd only act much like the tyrannosaur or the Spino, if they had to introduce yet another dino I say bring in the Carnotaurus  like what Skinner said, it was amazing in the novel so have it in the film. I'd love to see it camouflaging itself against the jungle a bit like the predator. Would be great!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc04.deviantart.net%2Ffs42%2Ff%2F2009%2F154%2Fd%2Fb%2Fthe_lost_world_carnotaurus_by_JELSIN.jpg&hash=df59a3c3327b01bc321ec0ff8e23c4c4e7dbcc56)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.imaginefx.com%2Ffxpose%2Fdamir_g_martins_portfolio%2Fimages%2F84103%2Foriginal.aspx&hash=890015ffc201e38d6fed4676a7e5f2934ae5a146)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 14, 2010, 11:59:07 AM
Yeah, after reading the novel I want so bad the Carnotaurus! First picture could inspire great posters.... 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 14, 2010, 03:13:39 PM
Anyone who is a fan of Jurassic Park should download this free album which is the memoirs of John hammond. It's very interesting and a great addition to any collection. He talks about the creation of site B and the hardship he endured during the creation and destruction of the Park. 

http://scallengerlegacytrilogy.trescom.org/jurassictime/index.html
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Mar 14, 2010, 04:30:28 PM
better just play the game, brah.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 14, 2010, 04:44:33 PM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Mar 14, 2010, 04:30:28 PM
better just play the game, brah.

If you're talking about Trespasser it's different, these guys have mixed in music and made it sound like a proper album about John Hammond's life. It's real good.  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 14, 2010, 05:00:45 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Mar 14, 2010, 11:59:07 AM
Yeah, after reading the novel I want so bad the Carnotaurus! First picture could inspire great posters.... 8)

Wasn't that dino in JP3? It walks up to Grant and the kid and smells some poop then walks away?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 14, 2010, 05:05:29 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Mar 14, 2010, 05:00:45 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Mar 14, 2010, 11:59:07 AM
Yeah, after reading the novel I want so bad the Carnotaurus! First picture could inspire great posters.... 8)

Wasn't that dino in JP3? It walks up to Grant and the kid and smells some poop then walks away?

Nope that was one of these.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fencyc%2Fdebates%2FCeratosaurus.jpg&hash=f86a0325bdab09f1ddf40dd8098b6ac1b3b975c2)


Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 14, 2010, 05:10:00 PM
Yes, it was a Ceratosaurus. And a really cool one at that (Il love breedin' em in JPOG!), if only hadn't such ridicolous cameo...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 14, 2010, 06:16:54 PM
Ya, they kind of threw the thing in there without any real reason. I want to see a dino-fight actually in the new film; Trike/T.Rex, or something.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 14, 2010, 06:18:25 PM
That would be an 'effin classic!

Regarding that picture of the Ceratosaurus, I have the complete Dinosaur Chart that has come with my Trilogy pack 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 14, 2010, 06:31:34 PM
Carnotaurus was the dinosaur from that disney movie right?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 14, 2010, 06:32:40 PM
Oooh, yes.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fusuarios.multimania.es%2Fdinosaurios%2Fimagenes%2Fcarnotaurus%2Fcarnotaurus04.jpg&hash=82b02666be30139299c8224116f7845be21cf5ca)
8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 14, 2010, 06:37:06 PM
I can't take Carnotaurus seriously. Those arms are just so pathetic lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 14, 2010, 06:38:05 PM
Because T.Rex arms are strong, muscular and flesh tearing. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 14, 2010, 06:39:14 PM
They are. And they're bigger than a Carnotaur's.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 14, 2010, 07:01:13 PM
They are neither as they served for nothing. Yes, they are, but one doesn't criticize T.Rex for its small arms :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 14, 2010, 08:12:46 PM
They are strong and muscular at least. They could lift up to 400 lbs and the claws were big, big enough to act as meathooks.

As for no criticism...Jack Horner just called.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 14, 2010, 08:28:15 PM
LOL! I'll never forget the sh*tload of praises for the Spinosaurus on the JPIII Special! LOL, he judged a Dinosaur's ferocity on the lenght :D what about Sauropods then??? XD
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ANYTIME 420 on Mar 14, 2010, 10:43:21 PM
I wish they would make Jurassic Park IV . I want to see a full grown Dilophosaurus own a Velociraptor and i want to see a T-rex kill a Spinosaur. Not to mention a sequel to jurassic park operation genesis. Oh well...a guy can dream at least...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 14, 2010, 10:44:35 PM
QuoteI can't take Carnotaurus seriously. Those arms are just so pathetic lol

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FgK7BUBVxB1k%2F0.jpg&hash=d0d13172881050a36590f5a925708b25a8e54c77)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 15, 2010, 05:00:48 AM
What?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 15, 2010, 05:29:07 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93B072j-E3I
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Mar 15, 2010, 01:52:53 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Mar 14, 2010, 08:28:15 PM
LOL! I'll never forget the sh*tload of praises for the Spinosaurus on the JPIII Special! LOL, he judged a Dinosaur's ferocity on the lenght :D what about Sauropods then??? XD
That was totally lame commercialism. They obviously said all that just to market the poor thing instead of giving it any REAL merit.

William H. Macy: "T-Rex won't stand a chance, Spinosaurus is going to be the kid on the block from this point on." *pause* "Now where's my paycheck?"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 15, 2010, 04:01:08 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 14, 2010, 08:12:46 PM
They are strong and muscular at least. They could lift up to 400 lbs and the claws were big, big enough to act as meathooks.

As for no criticism...Jack Horner just called.

I hear ya! T-rex's arms were powerful, when the animal slept it used its arms to help get it back up. Their tiny compared to it's body but they were still very powerful.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DrHobo on Mar 15, 2010, 09:09:41 PM
Just found something cool to look at for a sec

http://imagechan.com/images/fcec24fdf5d2d77266024a40693b9a9d.gif (http://imagechan.com/images/fcec24fdf5d2d77266024a40693b9a9d.gif)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Mar 15, 2010, 09:24:13 PM
 :o GAH!  :-[
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Mar 15, 2010, 09:27:50 PM
3D without glasses. Woah there!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 15, 2010, 09:37:56 PM
Quote from: Swizzly64 on Mar 15, 2010, 09:09:41 PM
Just found something cool to look at for a sec

http://imagechan.com/images/fcec24fdf5d2d77266024a40693b9a9d.gif (http://imagechan.com/images/fcec24fdf5d2d77266024a40693b9a9d.gif)

That. is. TRIPPY.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 15, 2010, 09:56:25 PM
Quote from: Swizzly64 on Mar 15, 2010, 09:09:41 PM
Just found something cool to look at for a sec

http://imagechan.com/images/fcec24fdf5d2d77266024a40693b9a9d.gif (http://imagechan.com/images/fcec24fdf5d2d77266024a40693b9a9d.gif)

That came with my VHS copy of the Lost World when I bought it in the late 90's!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Mar 15, 2010, 10:51:47 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Mar 15, 2010, 09:56:25 PM
Quote from: Swizzly64 on Mar 15, 2010, 09:09:41 PM
Just found something cool to look at for a sec

http://imagechan.com/images/fcec24fdf5d2d77266024a40693b9a9d.gif (http://imagechan.com/images/fcec24fdf5d2d77266024a40693b9a9d.gif)

That came with my VHS copy of the Lost World when I bought it in the late 90's!
Hey, I remember that too. It's all coming back to me now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 16, 2010, 05:05:21 AM
I used to have that card...really wish I knew where it was :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Mar 16, 2010, 12:30:25 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 15, 2010, 04:01:08 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 14, 2010, 08:12:46 PM
They are strong and muscular at least. They could lift up to 400 lbs and the claws were big, big enough to act as meathooks.

As for no criticism...Jack Horner just called.

I hear ya! T-rex's arms were powerful, when the animal slept it used its arms to help get it back up. Their tiny compared to it's body but they were still very powerful.
The arms were also small for mating reasons.

*play's Macarro Chacarro with the 3D image*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 16, 2010, 02:20:35 PM
Quote from: Swizzly64 on Mar 15, 2010, 09:09:41 PM
Just found something cool to look at for a sec

http://imagechan.com/images/fcec24fdf5d2d77266024a40693b9a9d.gif (http://imagechan.com/images/fcec24fdf5d2d77266024a40693b9a9d.gif)

HOLY f**kING SHIT! :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Mar 16, 2010, 03:00:03 PM
this technology was here long ago and nobody told us?

ITS A CONPIRACY!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 16, 2010, 06:29:23 PM
Quote from: Swizzly64 on Mar 15, 2010, 09:09:41 PM
Just found something cool to look at for a sec

http://imagechan.com/images/fcec24fdf5d2d77266024a40693b9a9d.gif (http://imagechan.com/images/fcec24fdf5d2d77266024a40693b9a9d.gif)
Fookin 3D Magic, Mahn!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DrHobo on Mar 16, 2010, 07:32:36 PM
Had that card, too. I recently (and with recently meaning 2 years) found and throwed it into the trash can :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 17, 2010, 12:25:08 AM
You fool!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Yautja117 on Mar 17, 2010, 01:59:46 AM
Love that. Used to have it as a kid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 17, 2010, 03:21:45 AM
Well since this thread has become a bit of nostalgia for some of us, and that isn't a bad thing!

I was really young when I seen Jurassic Park and had the Kenner Toys!!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.figurerealm.com%2FGalleries%2Fjurassicpark%2FDennis-Series1-Front.jpg&hash=620ff52ccbe3cb86532e78378ed3fe2f32a3c46a)

Personally my favorite toy at the time, Robert Muldoon!  8)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.figurerealm.com%2FGalleries%2Fjurassicpark%2FRobert-Series1-Front.jpg&hash=9396ce0539a4844c34aabda0015c601077bfa183)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.figurerealm.com%2FGalleries%2Fjurassicpark%2FJungleExplorer-Front.jpg&hash=556b45a59fdbbd0b29aad44a2cb886bbec2ba2c7)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.figurerealm.com%2FGalleries%2Fjurassicpark%2FBushDevil-Front.jpg&hash=41c56a64150d8db83cceccf71517b57061a3f6bf)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.figurerealm.com%2FGalleries%2Fjurassicpark%2FAlanAerialNet-Series1-Front.jpg&hash=d2e4b816c412a7a23157f7659df73b312bed8f28)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 17, 2010, 03:23:32 AM
Wow.  Denis musta been working out something fierce!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 17, 2010, 03:24:33 AM
Yea, I aways got a kick out of how they made Dennis respectable looking.  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 17, 2010, 03:26:16 AM
Maybe it's his good twin.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 17, 2010, 03:31:23 AM
I had the Stegosaurus toy. I wish I had those, though. God, these films really shaped my childhood. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 17, 2010, 03:35:10 AM
The Lost World!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.figurerealm.com%2FGalleries%2Fjurassicparklostworld%2FEddieCarr-Series1-Front.jpg&hash=cffb9be65c48e3cc4ae526109be6c21146cd63bf)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.figurerealm.com%2FGalleries%2Fjurassicparklostworld%2FIanMalcolm-Series1-Front.jpg&hash=f81943ae5d65287f1b328123fe4f784c48e14207)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.figurerealm.com%2FGalleries%2Fjurassicparklostworld%2FNickVanOwen-Series1-Front.jpg&hash=92656e985e1409fd16ff1a25488e514fb27bb373)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.figurerealm.com%2FGalleries%2Fjurassicparklostworld%2FRolandTembo-Series1-Front.jpg&hash=92c3c5e2a2b5638e8f78addf11f407213a62448e)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.figurerealm.com%2FGalleries%2Fjurassicparklostworld%2FDieterStark-Series1-Front.jpg&hash=c7b59b258ff5a65cb9f507ffe0f828111b4cee91)

God, the memories.  :'(  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 17, 2010, 03:46:23 AM
Just for the nostalgic value, I want one more good Jurassic Park film. :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 17, 2010, 03:47:55 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Mar 17, 2010, 03:46:23 AM
Just for the nostalgic value, I want one more good Jurassic Park film. :(

QFT!! Amen sir!

It would be a wetdream if Spielberg came back and directed like Indy4.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 17, 2010, 04:07:09 AM
Only I don't want this film to be terrible.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 17, 2010, 04:09:29 AM
How would a new film have "nostalgic value"?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 17, 2010, 04:13:14 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Mar 17, 2010, 04:07:09 AM
Only I don't want this film to be terrible.

It will be awesome! Imagine Grant and Malcolm reuniting.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 17, 2010, 04:51:14 AM
Quote from: SM on Mar 17, 2010, 04:09:29 AM
How would a new film have "nostalgic value"?

Remind you of the old one?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 17, 2010, 04:52:15 AM
So watch the old one.  It's the best anyway.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcheezcomixed.files.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F02%2F129108138773303613.jpg&hash=89ab60c1d7cdf153d8b9e8a1b4c61df1e4738248)

See?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Mar 17, 2010, 02:04:27 PM
Wonderful.  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 17, 2010, 03:12:17 PM
Quote from: SM on Mar 17, 2010, 04:52:15 AM
So watch the old one.  It's the best anyway.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcheezcomixed.files.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F02%2F129108138773303613.jpg&hash=89ab60c1d7cdf153d8b9e8a1b4c61df1e4738248)

See?

If only...maybe she'd eat the entire damn cast and end it!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 17, 2010, 07:52:18 PM
Quote from: SM on Mar 17, 2010, 04:52:15 AM
So watch the old one.  It's the best anyway.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcheezcomixed.files.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F02%2F129108138773303613.jpg&hash=89ab60c1d7cdf153d8b9e8a1b4c61df1e4738248)

See?

hehehehe
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 17, 2010, 11:45:10 PM
Quote from: SM on Mar 17, 2010, 04:52:15 AM
So watch the old one.  It's the best anyway.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcheezcomixed.files.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F02%2F129108138773303613.jpg&hash=89ab60c1d7cdf153d8b9e8a1b4c61df1e4738248)

See?

If there is a God, he'd make this happen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Mar 18, 2010, 12:04:31 AM
chicks dont dig dinosaurs  :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Yautja117 on Mar 18, 2010, 12:23:08 AM
Is it wrong to say I want someone talented to remake JP into a film closer to the book? I love the movie, but they're barely similar.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 18, 2010, 12:25:42 AM
It is wrong. Very wrong. I'm sorry I have to do this again.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg13.imageshack.us%2Fimg13%2F3941%2Ftrex2n.gif&hash=cb9c11cfeb61e349f8a91c4524abf199b7fa5ea8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Yautja117 on Mar 18, 2010, 12:27:20 AM
Don't be.  ;) Rex's are quite tame. We need a Spinosaur!  :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 18, 2010, 12:50:49 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg13.imageshack.us%2Fimg13%2F3941%2Ftrex2n.gif&hash=cb9c11cfeb61e349f8a91c4524abf199b7fa5ea8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Mar 18, 2010, 01:01:17 AM
Does anyone have one of these?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.superherotimes.com%2Fnewsarchive%2F1dinoUSE2.jpg&hash=6ca8762a1f085244040d89f9469cbbd817757eae)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 18, 2010, 01:16:58 AM
I wish I did. :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 18, 2010, 05:09:06 AM
Quote from: Yautja117 on Mar 18, 2010, 12:23:08 AM
Is it wrong to say I want someone talented to remake JP into a film closer to the book? I love the movie, but they're barely similar.

When did you ever see a movie based on a book that was completely similar? JP is the best you'll ever get, considering there were lines from the book that were verbatim in the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: stephen on Mar 18, 2010, 06:43:25 AM
Silence of the Lambs was actually pretty damn close.

And The Rainmaker movie was actually better then the book in my opinion.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Mar 18, 2010, 11:02:23 AM
Both the Da Vinci Code and Angels & Demons where extremely close to the books narrative and structure, as well as the events in them. Obviously they added and omitted things to make it work better on film. Personally I was baffled when they made Da Vinci Code because while a good read, I didnt think it would translate well to a movie and I dont think it did. However I found Angels & Demons a fast paced book which would have made an excellent thriller and sure enough the movie version was alot better than its predecessor. Angels & Demons is a much better book, I think the only reason The Da Vinci Code got all the hype and the movie pushed through was because of its twist and subject matter.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Yautja117 on Mar 18, 2010, 11:46:07 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 18, 2010, 05:09:06 AM
Quote from: Yautja117 on Mar 18, 2010, 12:23:08 AM
Is it wrong to say I want someone talented to remake JP into a film closer to the book? I love the movie, but they're barely similar.

When did you ever see a movie based on a book that was completely similar? JP is the best you'll ever get, considering there were lines from the book that were verbatim in the film.
True. I still like them both though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 18, 2010, 01:27:14 PM
I prefer it if a film is nothing like the book its based off, then it still has the power to surprise me. Jurassic Park and The Lost World did this when I first saw them. I mean if you want the same story as the book read the book why do you need a film to do that for you?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Mar 18, 2010, 05:34:55 PM
I think The Lost World was a bit too different actually. It's not like it couldn't have kept the second team as Dodgson/King/Baselton and some of the other scenes like the Raptor chase and Carnotaurus village. The deal is, while a movie doesn't have to reconstruct the novel like a slave it still doesn't have to outdo the previous installments by being too outrageous. While the city rampage is entertaining to some it's still embarassing just because of how unoriginal it is. It's basically ripped off from the Conan Doyle film. This is Jurassic Park and not the old Lost World. Meaby these sequels went a bit too far in that aspect. I like the dinosaurs but feel that the stories could have lacked a lot less originality while keeping the human cast manageable with more emphasis on the dinosaur co-stars. This is what the first movie did with honor. It's unlikely that we will ever get follow-up movies with a caliber like that from Hollywood.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 18, 2010, 05:36:11 PM
Ripped off, no. Homage to olda Dinosaur movies, yes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Mar 18, 2010, 06:01:43 PM
Do you know theres alot of hate towards The Lost World but I really like it. Infact I may go as far as to say its my favourite of the trilogy. Sure its more far fetched but its a movie about dinosaurs for gods sake, not a serious drama with well written dialogue and emotional impact. It does what it says on the tin and i think its got the best sequences of the entire trilogy.
I really cant see what all the hate is for.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 18, 2010, 06:03:40 PM
It IS my favortie in the trilogy. As much as I love part 1, the whole InGen storming the island, is what I loved about it. Also it had two T-Rex's  :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Mar 18, 2010, 06:32:07 PM
Quote from: Keg on Mar 18, 2010, 06:01:43 PM
Do you know theres alot of hate towards The Lost World but I really like it. Infact I may go as far as to say its my favourite of the trilogy. Sure its more far fetched but its a movie about dinosaurs for gods sake, not a serious drama with well written dialogue and emotional impact. It does what it says on the tin and i think its got the best sequences of the entire trilogy.
I really cant see what all the hate is for.
Yet it's story used to be more original. What meaning does the existence of those dinosaurs have? The sequels never delve into that and instead make them overshadowed by the human characters. Jurassic Park is not unique because of it's effects anymore for the mere reason that you see similar CGI effects elsewhere nowadays(although way more obvious). This is why I prefer the original JP.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DrHobo on Mar 18, 2010, 08:48:46 PM
QuoteJurassic Park is not unique because of it's effects anymore for the mere reason that you see similar CGI effects elsewhere nowadays(although way more obvious). This is why I prefer the original JP.
I find it strange that a 17 year old movie has better effects than current movies.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Yautja117 on Mar 18, 2010, 08:50:44 PM
Quote from: Swizzly64 on Mar 18, 2010, 08:48:46 PM
QuoteJurassic Park is not unique because of it's effects anymore for the mere reason that you see similar CGI effects elsewhere nowadays(although way more obvious). This is why I prefer the original JP.
I find it strange that a 17 year old movie has better effects than current movies.
Because JP's the best.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 18, 2010, 09:12:43 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Mar 18, 2010, 06:03:40 PM
It IS my favortie in the trilogy. As much as I love part 1, the whole InGen storming the island, is what I loved about it. Also it had two T-Rex's  :o

Even though the first JP is my favourite film of all time, you are a legend! I really look up to people who appreicate the second film for all its worth :) 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Yautja117 on Mar 18, 2010, 09:13:34 PM
The second was good, but I still like JP the best.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: stephen on Mar 19, 2010, 03:36:29 AM
the second was crap
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 19, 2010, 04:11:09 AM
That makes rexy mad.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg217.imageshack.us%2Fimg217%2F5877%2Ftrex3.gif&hash=304f20bbec95a04c61fdb5fe48a41fa555948e0a)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 19, 2010, 04:16:05 AM
Heeeeeeyyy!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 19, 2010, 04:16:59 AM
 :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 19, 2010, 08:44:59 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Mar 19, 2010, 04:11:09 AM
That makes rexy mad.

http://img217.imageshack.us/img217/5877/trex3.gif

Who put the xenomorph in its mouth  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Mar 19, 2010, 12:16:37 PM
Quote from: Swizzly64 on Mar 18, 2010, 08:48:46 PM
QuoteJurassic Park is not unique because of it's effects anymore for the mere reason that you see similar CGI effects elsewhere nowadays(although way more obvious). This is why I prefer the original JP.
I find it strange that a 17 year old movie has better effects than current movies.
It's not that the effects are bad or anything, the problem is that is all people currently give a damn about, the effects as long as they're maximally flashy. We have lost something more important in the process, the storytelling skill. Storytelling is never truly dependent on effects as those only enhance it, playing a small part in the whole essence. If you abuse an effect it takes too important role thus no longer enhances the story but replaces it. And that's usually a death sentence to classic potential(depending on what people consider "classic").

I personally feel that The Lost World led to the existence of Jurassic Park 3 thus is just as bad. The only potential that at least I saw in it was near the beginning. The attack on the girl at the beach could have opened a build-up any type of story in Site B. What we instead got was virtually the same used formula we got in the Conan Doyle namesake and King Kong where a crew of people go to an island to collect specimen/film a documentary and end up bringing back a powerful creature which wreaks havoc in a city before being succumbed either by the animal escaping back to it's homeworld or being shot down. The Lost World: Jurassic Park merely repeats this instead of trying to be it's own thing. Spielberg holds the blame for this for not bothering to try making it be it's own thing and instead turning it into one immense "homage" to other movies. I know, he had some homages in the first movie too but not in this scale. That's the mistake, they just didn't want an original movie when they had the building blocks. The novel had much more material to offer than they ended up using. Filling the holes with material from other films of the genre instead alone is blasphemy. No pun but in my eyes at least the sequels are inferior to their predecessor.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 19, 2010, 12:30:09 PM
Quote from: Nychus on Mar 19, 2010, 12:16:37 PM
I personally feel that The Lost World led to the existence of Jurassic Park 3 thus is just as bad.

Alien led to the existence of Alien: Resurrection does that make it bad?

Quote from: Nychus on Mar 19, 2010, 12:16:37 PM
What we instead got was virtually the same used formula we got in the Conan Doyle namesake and King Kong where a crew of people go to an island to collect specimen/film a documentary and end up bringing back a powerful creature which wreaks havoc in a city before being succumbed either by the animal escaping back to it's homeworld or being shot down

But it works so well because if that island really existed people would go there to document them and others would go to hunt them. it's plot maybe be a homage to other classic stories but it works as a chapter in the Jurassic Park series. Come on Stan Winston's t-rex rampaging through San Diego who wouldn't want that?!

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dark Passenger on Mar 19, 2010, 12:31:50 PM
QuoteAlien led to the existence of Alien: Resurrection does that make it bad?

no it didnt...alien 3 did.....
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 19, 2010, 12:35:36 PM
Quote from: Dark Passenger on Mar 19, 2010, 12:31:50 PM
QuoteAlien led to the existence of Alien: Resurrection does that make it bad?

no it didnt...alien 3 did.....

But then you could argue Aliens lead to Alien 3, and Alien lead to Aliens so ergo Alien lead to A:R. I'm making the point that if a sequel is bad doesn't always mean the predecessor is bad as well, because of this sentence:

Quote from: Nychus on Mar 19, 2010, 12:16:37 PM
I personally feel that The Lost World led to the existence of Jurassic Park 3 thus is just as bad.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dark Passenger on Mar 19, 2010, 12:38:41 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 19, 2010, 12:35:36 PM
Quote from: Dark Passenger on Mar 19, 2010, 12:31:50 PM
QuoteAlien led to the existence of Alien: Resurrection does that make it bad?

no it didnt...alien 3 did.....

But then you could argue Aliens lead to Alien 3, and Alien lead to Aliens so ergo Alien lead to A:R. I'm making the point that if a sequel is bad doesn't always mean the predecessor is bad as well, because of this sentence:
Quote from: Nychus on Mar 19, 2010, 12:16:37 PM
I personally feel that The Lost World led to the existence of Jurassic Park 3 thus is just as bad.

thats true...but the guy who originally posted it obviously didnt like the lost world so he blames its shittinest for producing another shitty sequel, so to speak...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Mar 19, 2010, 12:56:49 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 19, 2010, 12:35:36 PM
Quote from: Dark Passenger on Mar 19, 2010, 12:31:50 PM
QuoteAlien led to the existence of Alien: Resurrection does that make it bad?

no it didnt...alien 3 did.....

But then you could argue Aliens lead to Alien 3, and Alien lead to Aliens so ergo Alien lead to A:R. I'm making the point that if a sequel is bad doesn't always mean the predecessor is bad as well, because of this sentence:

Quote from: Nychus on Mar 19, 2010, 12:16:37 PM
I personally feel that The Lost World led to the existence of Jurassic Park 3 thus is just as bad.
But there is a reason for why Alien 3 and Alien: Resurrection exist. Their creators had the excuse to make something lackluster. The Lost World is the excuse Jurassic Park 3 needed to exist.

As for the formula, it worked in King Kong and Doyle's Lost World but in "Jurassic Park 2" it's just a repeat of those movies. While it's true many people would go there the public wouldn't necessarily know as very few would return alive and barely anyone would believe them. The only reason the public knows in the movie is because of that city rampage. If they had spared us that predictable note the films still would have more charm. You see, Isla Nublar of the first movie and Isla Sorna of the sequels aren't just "lost continents". There is a clear reason for why those dinosaurs exist the way they do in the story but it never has been given more ground to stand on because of the aim the sequels took. The story was far better before this point in the franchise. There were simply more perplexing and mysterious subplots in how those dinosaurs were made. The sequels waste that charm to beaten dead horses to borrow the popular term. This quickly made the films a beaten horse corpse. I wish that horse corpse was resurrected to it's live counterpart which it won't if all the ideas they come up with are along the lines of "Homocraptors with guns". Just my two cents.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 19, 2010, 01:01:30 PM
I agree with you Nychus but I still enjoyed the Lost World very much and JP/// was a good pop corn movie. however they do need to stop doing the whole people trapped on an island full of dinosaurs plot because it's been done to death.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 19, 2010, 01:05:20 PM
Solution: Bring all of Sorna's Dinosaurs on America and develop a film a la Reign of Fire! I know!


*hides in bunker*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 19, 2010, 02:05:31 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 19, 2010, 08:44:59 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Mar 19, 2010, 04:11:09 AM
That makes rexy mad.

http://img217.imageshack.us/img217/5877/trex3.gif

Who put the xenomorph in its mouth  :P

Yours truly. :)

Quote from: Nychus on Mar 19, 2010, 12:56:49 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 19, 2010, 12:35:36 PM
Quote from: Dark Passenger on Mar 19, 2010, 12:31:50 PM
QuoteAlien led to the existence of Alien: Resurrection does that make it bad?

no it didnt...alien 3 did.....

But then you could argue Aliens lead to Alien 3, and Alien lead to Aliens so ergo Alien lead to A:R. I'm making the point that if a sequel is bad doesn't always mean the predecessor is bad as well, because of this sentence:

Quote from: Nychus on Mar 19, 2010, 12:16:37 PM
I personally feel that The Lost World led to the existence of Jurassic Park 3 thus is just as bad.
But there is a reason for why Alien 3 and Alien: Resurrection exist. Their creators had the excuse to make something lackluster. The Lost World is the excuse Jurassic Park 3 needed to exist.

As for the formula, it worked in King Kong and Doyle's Lost World but in "Jurassic Park 2" it's just a repeat of those movies. While it's true many people would go there the public wouldn't necessarily know as very few would return alive and barely anyone would believe them. The only reason the public knows in the movie is because of that city rampage. If they had spared us that predictable note the films still would have more charm. You see, Isla Nublar of the first movie and Isla Sorna of the sequels aren't just "lost continents". There is a clear reason for why those dinosaurs exist the way they do in the story but it never has been given more ground to stand on because of the aim the sequels took. The story was far better before this point in the franchise. There were simply more perplexing and mysterious subplots in how those dinosaurs were made. The sequels waste that charm to beaten dead horses to borrow the popular term. This quickly made the films a beaten horse corpse. I wish that horse corpse was resurrected to it's live counterpart which it won't if all the ideas they come up with are along the lines of "Homocraptors with guns". Just my two cents.

Ah, great. You just made me come close to hating the Lost World.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 19, 2010, 05:11:24 PM
The Lost World is an all round, great film and a wonderfully crafted adventure, granted it is rehashing the old lost island of dinosaurs story.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Mar 20, 2010, 12:15:09 AM
There hasn't been a JP IV update in a while.  :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 20, 2010, 01:39:55 AM
I think once we get past the Captain America film, Johnston will focus more on the next JP film, so it might be a while.  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 20, 2010, 01:44:36 AM
I don't think I can wait. I must invent a time machine, use it to go back into the past, and bring myself into the future when Jurassic Park IV has been released, thus making it so I do not have to wait.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 20, 2010, 04:55:06 AM
Or go to the point where Joey said he was going to direct the next film, punch him in the nose, then come back.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 20, 2010, 05:10:13 AM
Perhaps... I suppose I could also find out the secret to efficient fuel cell and fusion power, bring the technology back with me, and make untold billions of dollars. Nah.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 20, 2010, 05:11:26 AM
That's before I steal your blueprints for the machine and do it first!!

See? Chaos theory; bet you didn't think of that hole in your idea!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 20, 2010, 05:15:09 AM
Then I'll simply travel back in time to the year you were born, and kill every infant. Ha HA!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 20, 2010, 05:18:54 AM
Pfft, I'll go back in time to the year your parents were born!

;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 20, 2010, 05:21:03 AM
But you're already nonexistant!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 20, 2010, 05:23:54 AM
Not if I beat you to it!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 20, 2010, 05:27:10 AM
The race is on!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 20, 2010, 05:46:42 AM
Did anyone ever play Warpath on the PS1? So cheesy in its concept but oh so fun ;D 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 20, 2010, 06:01:16 AM
I remember renting it for the PS1, and it was fun.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Yautja117 on Mar 20, 2010, 06:18:30 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 20, 2010, 05:46:42 AM
Did anyone ever play Warpath on the PS1? So cheesy in its concept but oh so fun ;D 8)
I still own it. Hell, I don't even have a playstation anymore and I still have it. Some of my fondest gaming memories are warped up in that game.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 20, 2010, 08:30:19 AM
I love The Lost World for the PS1. Still have it and play it :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 20, 2010, 04:51:23 PM
Quote from: Yautja117 on Mar 20, 2010, 06:18:30 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 20, 2010, 05:46:42 AM
Did anyone ever play Warpath on the PS1? So cheesy in its concept but oh so fun ;D 8)
I still own it. Hell, I don't even have a playstation anymore and I still have it. Some of my fondest gaming memories are warped up in that game.

I rented it several times and I wish I could still buy it but finding a good copy is like finding Waldo :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 20, 2010, 04:54:37 PM
I've never played. :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Yautja117 on Mar 20, 2010, 05:08:27 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Mar 20, 2010, 04:54:37 PM
I've never played. :(
That sucks!  :'(  It's sort of Mortal Kombat with Dinosaurs and pretty gory effects. I remember using the Rex (my favorite dino) and I came out of the fight with both eyes cut out. It was epic.  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 20, 2010, 05:09:47 PM




Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 20, 2010, 05:19:33 PM
It's brimming with awesome!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Mar 20, 2010, 05:32:48 PM
Also got it. Haven't played it for years. Quite brilliant though it's odd how all the dinosaurs can jump a long way up and the Compies are man-sized.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 20, 2010, 05:33:20 PM
I personally love the roundhouse kicks to the head. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Yautja117 on Mar 20, 2010, 05:35:42 PM
Eatting dogs, Compys and humans was fun.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 20, 2010, 05:46:14 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Mar 20, 2010, 05:33:20 PM
I personally love the roundhouse kicks to the head. :D

Should see the Styracosaurus. Literally, flipping backwards with a quadrupedic herbivore: EPIC WIN.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 20, 2010, 05:50:01 PM
 :o I must find a video of that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Mar 20, 2010, 08:25:13 PM
i played that game in the house of a friend. nothing special, really.  ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Mar 21, 2010, 09:52:01 PM
I think it looks pretty fun.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dark Passenger on Mar 22, 2010, 12:17:31 AM
played it ages ago, fair fun game. How are the graphics holding up? lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on Mar 22, 2010, 09:59:26 AM
I think it looks rather silly. Velociraptor ninja-kicking Spinosaurus is just weird.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dark Passenger on Mar 22, 2010, 11:00:16 AM
the only problem i have with that game is the size differences, i mean it has a raptor the size of t-rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Yautja117 on Mar 22, 2010, 11:47:59 AM
^It's a Mega-Raptor, a very large species from South America.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on Mar 22, 2010, 07:26:13 PM
Except Megaraptor was not a dromaeosaur, not even a maniraptoran.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 22, 2010, 08:18:48 PM
Come on did anyone else play this and get obsessed like I did/ kinda till are?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimage.com.com%2Fgamespot%2Fimages%2Fbigboxshots%2F4%2F197804_89006_front.jpg&hash=ba824b4c765f7616644d48b650080cdc2c8a6e50)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8i-0wa4fpAQ



Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Mar 22, 2010, 08:36:09 PM
Ah, the memories...

Jumping on a human as the Raptor and then front flipping off was just win.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Mar 22, 2010, 08:40:54 PM
you know for a ps1 game those dinos look fantastic
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Mar 22, 2010, 08:51:10 PM
Holy shit!

They're gonna' need some more Ingen guys, I guess...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: JediMasterGabe on Mar 22, 2010, 08:58:00 PM
There are so many different rumors going on with this movie, and it's on IGN's list of Movies Stuck in Development Hell. So who knows when we'll acually see this movie get made, if at all. But I really hope it does, Jurassic Park was one of my favorite movies as a kid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Mar 22, 2010, 09:05:31 PM
I really want to see the idea of the dinosaur virus made into a film. That the reason the dinosaurs became extinct was some crazy ass plague that wiped out nearly all living things. This plague was brought back when some infected dino dna was cloned and after 15 years its started to take hold and begin to come to a fruition once more. Scientists get wind of it with an outbreak on the main land and contain it. They then have to send in a team to find out how dangerous it is and determine if it can be contained or cured. Theres your excuse for a bunch of people on the island and the story has a potentially worldwide catastrophe angle to it which necessitates a team to go to the island. Id think this would have to be more for a final film though. If there are to be more it wouldnt work, as id imagine this scenario would result in the dinosaurs having to be wiped out at the end as a precaution.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: JediMasterGabe on Mar 22, 2010, 09:39:26 PM
One of the biggest problems I see is Story. There are only so many ways to get a bunch of people on the same island as dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Mar 22, 2010, 09:45:27 PM
Agreed. I remember joking with my cousin after The Lost World was released that they wont have any excuses for a third film and if they make one they'll just cop out and have a bunch of people crash land on the island. Ummmmmm.....oh dear.

When you think about how absurd JPIII is with the idea they'd try and land and take off in an areoplane? Surely theyd use helicopters so they could land and take off pretty much anywhere they wanted. And it would be alot quicker than taking off in a plane.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 22, 2010, 10:14:29 PM
Quote from: TJ Doc on Mar 22, 2010, 08:51:10 PM
Holy shit!

They're gonna' need some more Ingen guys, I guess...

I hope that wasn't a scientist.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 22, 2010, 10:33:50 PM
Haha, you could also play as Deiter in the game! You had a grappling hook and machine gun.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 22, 2010, 10:36:37 PM
Ah yes, the iconic grappling ho- wait, what?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 22, 2010, 10:46:52 PM
We would latch on to cave spikes on the ceiling and stuff. You could swing back and fourth to reach ledges.  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 23, 2010, 12:15:59 AM
Quote from: Keg on Mar 22, 2010, 09:05:31 PM
I really want to see the idea of the dinosaur virus made into a film. That the reason the dinosaurs became extinct was some crazy ass plague that wiped out nearly all living things. This plague was brought back when some infected dino dna was cloned and after 15 years its started to take hold and begin to come to a fruition once more. Scientists get wind of it with an outbreak on the main land and contain it. They then have to send in a team to find out how dangerous it is and determine if it can be contained or cured. Theres your excuse for a bunch of people on the island and the story has a potentially worldwide catastrophe angle to it which necessitates a team to go to the island. Id think this would have to be more for a final film though. If there are to be more it wouldnt work, as id imagine this scenario would result in the dinosaurs having to be wiped out at the end as a precaution.

You should read my old rough screenplay then :) It adds a whole new twist on the JP saga.
http://www.fileden.com/files/2007/7/10/1255595/Jurassic%20Park%204%20Screenplay.pdf
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Mar 23, 2010, 12:50:52 AM
Dallas Parker eh. Alien tribute no?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 23, 2010, 01:01:56 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ficanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F03%2Ffunny-pictures-cat-is-a-dinosaur.jpg&hash=b6ce66319658932b7e13820e6630d7decc3fd92f)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Mar 23, 2010, 01:11:40 AM
haha i remember being a six year old boy playing Jurassic Park at school with friends except nobody was the dinosaurs we where the characters from the film and we'd re-enact scenes from the film imagining the dinosaurs. I remember we jumped over a bench and huddled underneath it like the gallimimus scene with the t-rex and the log.

thank god it wasnt too long before i started playing football and rugby coz it was canny shit to be honest haha


Rhys Darby - Dinosaur Party joke

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhqoJML7baU
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 23, 2010, 02:34:42 AM
Quote from: SM on Mar 23, 2010, 01:01:56 AM
http://icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/funny-pictures-cat-is-a-dinosaur.jpg

:D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dark Passenger on Mar 23, 2010, 06:06:43 AM
Quote from: Yautja117 on Mar 22, 2010, 11:47:59 AM
^It's a Mega-Raptor, a very large species from South America.

i know that. the megaraptor although large wasnt the size of t-rex or spinosaurus, such as in the game.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 23, 2010, 06:12:49 AM
Quote from: Puks on Mar 22, 2010, 07:26:13 PM
Except Megaraptor was not a dromaeosaur, not even a maniraptoran.

The word you're looking for is carnosaur.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 23, 2010, 08:46:33 AM
Quote from: Keg on Mar 23, 2010, 12:50:52 AM
Dallas Parker eh. Alien tribute no?

Maybe :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on Mar 23, 2010, 09:15:57 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 23, 2010, 06:12:49 AM
Quote from: Puks on Mar 22, 2010, 07:26:13 PM
Except Megaraptor was not a dromaeosaur, not even a maniraptoran.

The word you're looking for is carnosaur.

Yep.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Mar 23, 2010, 11:00:19 AM
Quote from: Keg on Mar 22, 2010, 09:05:31 PM
I really want to see the idea of the dinosaur virus made into a film. That the reason the dinosaurs became extinct was some crazy ass plague that wiped out nearly all living things. This plague was brought back when some infected dino dna was cloned and after 15 years its started to take hold and begin to come to a fruition once more. Scientists get wind of it with an outbreak on the main land and contain it. They then have to send in a team to find out how dangerous it is and determine if it can be contained or cured. Theres your excuse for a bunch of people on the island and the story has a potentially worldwide catastrophe angle to it which necessitates a team to go to the island. Id think this would have to be more for a final film though. If there are to be more it wouldnt work, as id imagine this scenario would result in the dinosaurs having to be wiped out at the end as a precaution.
In the novel it wasn't harmful to humans and merely effected the lifespan of dinosaurs such as the Velociraptor and Apatosaurus. I could see this being brought in to a film but not in the "Outbreak" style but as a threat to the existence of the animals themselves which the heroes must prevent. Add to that some trigger happy Costa Rican militants and you have an interesting movie in your hands. It could also have the subplot of Velociraptors in the mainland as seen in this fan-made clay animation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xp_VXyUBB8k
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Mar 24, 2010, 10:35:50 PM
http://comics.ign.com/articles/107/1079284p1.html

New Jurassic Park comics!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 24, 2010, 10:45:15 PM
I don't usually read comics, but I may have to with those!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: fluxcap on Mar 24, 2010, 11:08:48 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 23, 2010, 06:12:49 AM
The word you're looking for is carnosaur.
Now I gotta watch that again. Guilty pleasure.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Mar 24, 2010, 11:50:53 PM
Quote from: Skinner on Mar 24, 2010, 10:35:50 PM
http://comics.ign.com/articles/107/1079284p1.html

New Jurassic Park comics!

YES! i have read all the other JP comics. awesomesauce
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Yautja117 on Mar 25, 2010, 12:44:17 AM
Quote from: fluxcap on Mar 24, 2010, 11:08:48 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 23, 2010, 06:12:49 AM
The word you're looking for is carnosaur.
Now I gotta watch that again. Guilty pleasure.
That movie scared the hell outta me as a kid. Like it now though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: XenoVC on Mar 25, 2010, 01:10:41 AM
Looking forward to the new JP comics,first new piece of media from the franchise in years!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcomicsmedia.ign.com%2Fcomics%2Fimage%2Farticle%2F107%2F1079284%2Fjurassic-park-redemption-20100323114734851_640w.jpg&hash=ca9c7d75f06c74362cf5f83c4a6be4aa37cc1b41)

Carnosaur much?  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 25, 2010, 01:15:07 AM
Humping the truck while nomming the cow much?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: XenoVC on Mar 25, 2010, 01:19:21 AM
Quote from: SM on Mar 25, 2010, 01:15:07 AM
Humping the truck while nomming the cow much?

Life will find a way.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 25, 2010, 01:21:06 AM
Thank you Dr. Malcolm.  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 25, 2010, 01:22:01 AM
"Take it, bitch!  Oooh!  Steak!!"  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 25, 2010, 01:22:09 AM
Are you suggesting that a population consisting entirely of females and automobiles will... breed?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Mar 25, 2010, 01:24:24 AM
A triceratops with three horns AND three wheels!!  The possibilities go way beyond urban pacification.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 25, 2010, 01:26:44 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Mar 25, 2010, 01:22:09 AM
Are you suggesting that a population consisting entirely of females and automobiles will... breed?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfiQYRn7fBg

:D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hybrid PM on Mar 25, 2010, 07:05:30 AM
God I love this movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Mar 25, 2010, 10:45:44 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Mar 25, 2010, 01:22:09 AM
Are you suggesting that a population consisting entirely of females and automobiles will... breed?
No, what I'm saying is that life.......uhm.........finds a driveway.  ;)

Excellent news. Jurassic Park hasn't had any new comics since the nineties. I always wondered why JP3 didn't have a comic adaptation. Guess that doesn't matter now does it? About time they bring a Carnotaurus in too(it better camouflage!)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Mar 25, 2010, 01:28:51 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Mar 25, 2010, 01:22:09 AM
Are you suggesting that a population consisting entirely of females and automobiles will... breed?

imagine the noise that would make...

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 25, 2010, 04:34:10 PM
Quote from: fluxcap on Mar 24, 2010, 11:08:48 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 23, 2010, 06:12:49 AM
The word you're looking for is carnosaur.
Now I gotta watch that again. Guilty pleasure.

Let's watch it this Sunday, whaddya say?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: cloverfan98 on Mar 25, 2010, 05:33:31 PM
I'd love to see a Carnosaur remake.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 25, 2010, 06:16:20 PM
^Me too, the 1993 film sucked big time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ryu on Mar 25, 2010, 09:50:40 PM
I´m said... KILL ALL!!!
Like  in the end of novel of Michael Crichton.
Hope turn in somenthig like this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B03mFaK2sVw
I´m still playng to day. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 25, 2010, 11:35:43 PM
*sniff* that game is too awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Corporal Lewis Hicks on Mar 25, 2010, 11:55:16 PM
The third one Just ruined the lot.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 26, 2010, 12:16:23 AM
I'd like to get my hands on the first two; they seem very interesting.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 26, 2010, 02:04:20 AM
The first game I found very boring so I never bothered much with it. But the second one just reeked of fun all-around ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Corporal Lewis Hicks on Mar 26, 2010, 03:56:52 PM
The third game was in space, Enough said you know that fails already.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 26, 2010, 03:58:55 PM
Quote from: Ryu on Mar 25, 2010, 09:50:40 PM
Hope turn in somenthig like this.
Please, please, no.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 26, 2010, 04:06:25 PM
Quote from: Corporal Lewis Hicks on Mar 26, 2010, 03:56:52 PM
The third game was in space, Enough said you know that fails already.

It wasn't the setting that killed it, it was God-damned camera!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 26, 2010, 04:09:49 PM
As a stand-alone game, DC3 could really make some kind of Horror/Sci-Fi film sometime.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Corporal Lewis Hicks on Mar 26, 2010, 04:14:29 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 26, 2010, 04:06:25 PM
Quote from: Corporal Lewis Hicks on Mar 26, 2010, 03:56:52 PM
The third game was in space, Enough said you know that fails already.

It wasn't the setting that killed it, it was God-damned camera!

For me the setting did it. The Camera was just an add on to the crap.  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Mar 26, 2010, 05:16:03 PM
It annoyed me something rotten when DC3 was set in space and had absolutely nothing to do with the first games. DC2 ended with a massive cliffhanger and it never got resolved. Surely bringing it back for PS3 with a sequel to DC2 would be brilliant.

DC3 was a joke. Teleporting raptors with heads like a hammer head shark? T-Rex's with 3 heads clinging to the side of a spaceship causing havoc? Yes you heard right and it was as daft and crap as it sounded. Shame because the graphics where awesome and the skinless T-Rex was brilliant. Shame they went too far with some of the other designs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 26, 2010, 05:39:15 PM
It's doubtful they will resurrect the series, which is dumb considering the Resident Evil series has had its fair share of flops yet they're still making more.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Mar 26, 2010, 05:56:49 PM
Imagine how good a DC game could be with the RE5 engine. I just want DC2 to be finally wrapped up. I actually think it would go down a storm at this present time. there hasnt been a good game with dinosaurs for years and who doesnt get a kick out of a T-Rex battle? If the time and effort was put into it and they marketed it properly i think a DC3 could be very succesful.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 26, 2010, 07:23:44 PM
Quote from: Keg on Mar 26, 2010, 05:16:03 PM
DC3 was a joke. Teleporting raptors with heads like a hammer head shark? T-Rex's with 3 heads clinging to the side of a spaceship causing havoc? Yes you heard right and it was as daft and crap as it sounded. Shame because the graphics where awesome and the skinless T-Rex was brilliant. Shame they went too far with some of the other designs.
The Spinosaurus thing was great 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Mar 26, 2010, 08:50:54 PM
which one was that? the one in the water? From what i remember some of the bosses where awesome bu they just got dafter and dafter by the end of the game. The story was horrible as well. In the first two games it was all about third energy skewing up time resulting in dinosaurs in our time or humans (and entire cities in DC2) getting transported back to their time. I though the plot of 2 was fantastic and the twist with Dylan was fantastic. DC3 ignores of all this and just claims that the A.I. of the ship went haywire and decided that humans where  crap and dinosaurs where the greatest living things ever so it recreated them and gave them new abilities/traits and let them evolve to see what they came up with? Eh What?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 26, 2010, 08:53:06 PM
Yep, the "Miaplacidus".
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fguidesmedia.teamxbox.com%2Fguides%2F482250%2Fimages%2Fmiaplacidus.jpg&hash=5848f43b3534ac39b09bc6c7efdb40f9c3c6e8fa)

The plot is pure randoM :D but with a few tweaks it would make a great horror film. Just not let Uwe Boll in.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Mar 26, 2010, 08:56:07 PM
Ever since i saw JP ive always thought a R or 18 certificate dinosaur movie would be awesome. Dino Crisis proved they could be scary and as a young kid the scene with Ellie in the basement with the Raptor was really scary. I doubt we'll ever see such a thing though because any dinosaur film is going to rely on most of its audience being under 18.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 26, 2010, 08:57:53 PM
Quote from: Keg on Mar 26, 2010, 05:56:49 PM
Imagine how good a DC game could be with the RE5 engine. I just want DC2 to be finally wrapped up. I actually think it would go down a storm at this present time. there hasnt been a good game with dinosaurs for years and who doesnt get a kick out of a T-Rex battle? If the time and effort was put into it and they marketed it properly i think a DC3 could be very succesful.

Seconded. They have the ideal engine and gameplay format for it now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Mar 26, 2010, 09:07:48 PM
Dammit watching these videos has made me all emotional. thats im playing dino crisis 1 and 2. might even start dc now.  The raptor ambush video is awesome. The bit where you see the raptors running through the streets attacking the citizens is amazing. Imagine something like that in a new game where you are in the middle of it. The possibilities are endless.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zFW2xj0xhU0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8leuqLtdq3g

aaaaaaaaaaah hurry up JP4 i need a dino fix. Turok was a massive let down.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 26, 2010, 09:08:24 PM
Without talking about Jurassic: The Hunted... ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Mar 26, 2010, 09:10:52 PM
was it any good. hasnt even been released for pal but you can get it in my local grainger games. looked like a load of crap so i didnt bother. looked very cheap and nasty?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 26, 2010, 09:25:58 PM
Just to name a few,
-The T.rex and the Spinosaurus have a brief "JP III homage", a 5 second crap battle that obviously ends out with the Spinosaurus as a winner, with the T.rex being oh so lazy.
-Primeval-Esque Anomalies
-Jurassic Park-ish Spitter Dilophosaurus
-Ugly Raptors
-Gameplay far too similar to DC and Turok
-2012 reference (and a crap one at that)

The Spinosaurus fully merits the appellative of Spinozilla!
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegameover.eu%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2009%2F10%2Fjurassic-the-hunted-playstation-3-ps3-006.jpg&hash=a4d1c28a33c745a7e5af43f0efc8a026afa38f11)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Friendly Wise on Mar 26, 2010, 09:29:32 PM
I just hope this movie turns out to be better than the third installment.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Corporal Lewis Hicks on Mar 26, 2010, 09:44:10 PM
Good to see a Free roaming Dino game in the jungle.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 26, 2010, 09:45:51 PM
Quote from: Keg on Mar 26, 2010, 09:10:52 PM
was it any good. hasnt even been released for pal but you can get it in my local grainger games. looked like a load of crap so i didnt bother. looked very cheap and nasty?

It sucked.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Mar 26, 2010, 10:27:05 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 26, 2010, 09:45:51 PM
Quote from: Keg on Mar 26, 2010, 09:10:52 PM
was it any good. hasnt even been released for pal but you can get it in my local grainger games. looked like a load of crap so i didnt bother. looked very cheap and nasty?

It sucked.

Thought so. I know you should never judge a book by its cover but i saw it on the shelf and almost went "uuuuuugh". It smacked of a budget release. It was the modern day video game equivalent of those straight to vhs 80's releases that you knew where going to be utter crap but you couldnt resist a peek
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 26, 2010, 11:18:15 PM
In case you're interested: http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/xbox360/jurassicthehunted?q=jurassic%20the%20hunted
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sylizar on Mar 27, 2010, 11:24:27 AM
Gotta admit though, that Spino is one hardcore looking beast.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Mar 28, 2010, 03:57:52 AM
Just watched the original today while i was reading. I really forgot how much i love the Dilophosaurus scene. Its such a beautiful creature in the movie, and I love the way it just curiously watches and interacts with Nedry before things turn violent. And I think i could go days discussing the T-Rex paddock scene, and how even after all these years I still find the Raptors to be one of the scariest and most unsettling movie creatures i've ever seen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 28, 2010, 06:15:01 PM
Unsettling? That's a strong word to use. I agree they were scary, but how were they unsettling?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 28, 2010, 06:24:35 PM
Unsettling isn't certainly the right word for them IMHO.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Mar 28, 2010, 08:00:22 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 28, 2010, 06:15:01 PM
Unsettling? That's a strong word to use. I agree they were scary, but how were they unsettling?

In how they were portrayed as such smart, clever animals. Using teamwork and brains to flush out and kill their prey.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Mar 28, 2010, 08:06:32 PM
Well if theyve unsettled the viewer then they are unsettling. They may not be to everybody but i kinda agree. Thats why i though the new raptors in JP3 where rubbish. Yeah they where closer to reality and what we know about raptors but those big, bulky raptors with their piercing stare from the first movie are really creepy. Theyre unsettling because you get the sense that they are just as smart as you. In JP3 they just felt like animals, in JP they where presented as almost like a serial killers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ShadowStalker on Mar 28, 2010, 08:14:23 PM
How about the Utahraptor...that was supposedly the biggest of the raptor species thats been found to date, or last time ive checked
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 28, 2010, 09:03:32 PM
Quote from: Keg on Mar 28, 2010, 08:06:32 PM
Well if theyve unsettled the viewer then they are unsettling. They may not be to everybody but i kinda agree. Thats why i though the new raptors in JP3 where rubbish. Yeah they where closer to reality and what we know about raptors but those big, bulky raptors with their piercing stare from the first movie are really creepy. Theyre unsettling because you get the sense that they are just as smart as you. In JP3 they just felt like animals, in JP they where presented as almost like a serial killers.

In JP3 they snapped a man's neck and glared at their prey. I'd say that's even scarier.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Mar 28, 2010, 09:10:16 PM
Holy moly just been doing a spot of research on Raptors and who ever mentioned Utahraptors as being the biggest heres a comparison. Holy hell. Theyre bloody huge.

Utahraptor
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2F4%2F4a%2FUtahraptor_scale.png&hash=b52a12770087a1b116e5798aded430adf3cd9f43)

Velociraptor
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgeology.rockbandit.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2008%2F12%2Fvelociraptor-size.jpg&hash=1bdf89c3c06524bd2c28d52ec9eccc09bb331e7b)

Deinonychus
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2F8%2F82%2FDeinonychus-scale.png&hash=d80880962c4528ec835a61157776c37eec1b2c73)

Looking at the size of a velociraptor the ones in JP3 are still massively innacurate so why they felt they needed to change them from their awesome original design is beyond me. The raptors in JP are even bigger than a Deinonychus. I say balls to what they are in reality. They established what they wanted in the first movie and they should of stuck with it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dark Passenger on Mar 28, 2010, 11:43:05 PM
theyve gotta use Utahraptor in future installments.  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 29, 2010, 08:07:33 AM
Wasn't it Utahraptor Ostrommaysi? ???
The JP raptors look just a bit smaller than the Utahraptor. But who says Deinonychus couldn't just grow larger? We've found few specimens.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on Mar 29, 2010, 08:10:11 AM
The "Velociraptor" in JP was Deinonychus, just a little big bigger. Utahraptor hadn't even been discovered at the time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 29, 2010, 08:14:24 AM
I remember something from Bakker... Spielberg! I found your Raptor! ;D
I don't remember where I read it though..
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SiL on Mar 29, 2010, 08:24:20 AM
I think they found Utahraptor during JP's development.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Mar 29, 2010, 09:17:01 AM
looking at the pictures of the deinonychus and utahraptor id say the Velociraptors in JP where pretty much bang inbetween the two. The deinonychus being 3m long and the utaraptor being 7m long (obviously the biggest ones discovered an like you said they aint found many deinonychus) then the raptors in the movie would probably have been 5m.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 29, 2010, 02:21:39 PM
Quote from: SiL on Mar 29, 2010, 08:24:20 AM
I think they found Utahraptor during JP's development.

They did. It was discovered in 1991.

The animals you see in the film are moe like Deinonychus than anything else, but the reason they used the name Velociraptor as opposed to Deinonychus is, as I understood it, Velociraptor sounded much more exotic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 29, 2010, 02:23:34 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 29, 2010, 02:21:39 PM
Quote from: SiL on Mar 29, 2010, 08:24:20 AM
I think they found Utahraptor during JP's development.

They did. It was discovered in 1991.

The animals you see in the film are moe like Deinonychus than anything else, but the reason they used the name Velociraptor as opposed to Deinonychus is, as I understood it, Velociraptor sounded much more exotic.
And terrifying.
And Commercial.

But if I'm not wrong at the times of the book, Deinonychus was considered just a larger specimen of Velociraptor.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 29, 2010, 02:31:08 PM
Don't think so, pretty sure they've always been considered separate species.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 29, 2010, 02:39:29 PM
Velociraptor (dubbed simply "raptor" in the film) also has a major role and is portrayed as the film's antagonist. The animal's depiction was not based on the actual dinosaur species in question (which itself was significantly smaller), rather the related (and larger) species Deinonychus, which was called Velociraptor antirrhopus by some scientists. Crichton's writing followed this, but by the time production of the film took place, the idea had been dropped by the scientific community.
Source (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jurassic_Park_(film)#cite_note-paul1988-39)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Mar 29, 2010, 02:46:53 PM
you know most people have a hard time trying to give-a-shit about the dino's name  :P

Velociraptor is fine as long as we don't start calling Compys "mini-raptors"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 29, 2010, 03:02:21 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Mar 29, 2010, 02:39:29 PM
Velociraptor (dubbed simply "raptor" in the film) also has a major role and is portrayed as the film's antagonist. The animal's depiction was not based on the actual dinosaur species in question (which itself was significantly smaller), rather the related (and larger) species Deinonychus, which was called Velociraptor antirrhopus by some scientists. Crichton's writing followed this, but by the time production of the film took place, the idea had been dropped by the scientific community.
Source (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jurassic_Park_(film)#cite_note-paul1988-39)

Hm, fascinating.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Airidok on Apr 02, 2010, 01:36:10 AM
I also believe that a few years ago they found a raptor that was roughly the size of the ones in the movie; the head, of course, was still the gator-like head, not the fake ones from the film. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 02, 2010, 01:41:51 AM
What was it named?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Airidok on Apr 02, 2010, 01:48:30 AM
I'm trying to find the news story; I read it a few years ago. Could be possible I misread it and it was something other than a Velociraptor... But I was so sure! ???

Edit: Turns out it was a "distant cousin" not an actual 6ft tall raptor.  :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 02, 2010, 02:18:51 AM
Do you have a link at all? I'd be interested to read it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Airidok on Apr 02, 2010, 04:01:56 PM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8575481.stm

I think that's the same story. A bit bigger than the Velociraptor.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sylizar on Apr 02, 2010, 08:28:28 PM
Then there's the Megaraptor.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 02, 2010, 09:04:44 PM
Which isn't a dromaeosaurid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Airidok on Apr 02, 2010, 09:33:09 PM
Right.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Apr 07, 2010, 10:20:23 PM
I have the perfect explanation for what raptor the one in the film actually is. The mosquito bit a species that either hasn't been preserved in the fossil record, or hasn't been discovered yet. Problem solved. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sylizar on Apr 07, 2010, 11:03:18 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 02, 2010, 09:04:44 PM
Which isn't a dromaeosaurid.

I know, but could you imagine that in JP?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Apr 07, 2010, 11:49:19 PM
maybe its just a mutant freak.

Grant says it quite explicit: these are not dinosaurs, these are theme park monsters.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 08, 2010, 01:16:58 AM
He can say all he wants, but they were dinosaurs. Within the context of the film, they are dinosaurs, nothing more, nothing less.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Apr 08, 2010, 02:00:06 AM
...that were part frog.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 08, 2010, 02:02:44 AM
Again, in the context of the film, the frog DNA didn't affect their behaviour, physical makeup, etc. In reality though, it definitely would.

The only way the DNA affected them was the ability to spontaneously change sexes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Apr 08, 2010, 02:05:07 AM
QuoteAgain, in the context of the film, the frog DNA didn't affect their behaviour, physical makeup, etc.

How do we know that without a point of comparison?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 08, 2010, 02:06:07 AM
Well they weren't hopping on two legs, and they weren't generating noise from a large pocket beneath their chin, for starters. And they didn't have fly-catching tongues either.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Airidok on Apr 08, 2010, 02:07:46 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 08, 2010, 02:06:07 AM
Well they weren't hopping on two legs, and they weren't generating noise from a large pocket beneath their chin, for starters. And they didn't have fly-catching tongues either.

Ooh, but how do we know that? Just because we didn't see them do it in the film? :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Apr 08, 2010, 02:14:35 AM
QuoteWell they weren't hopping on two legs, and they weren't generating noise from a large pocket beneath their chin, for starters. And they didn't have fly-catching tongues either.

Ah.  Sorry.  Thought this was approximating a serious discussion.  My bad.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 08, 2010, 02:24:17 AM
What? I'm going on what I saw in the film. What was your argument then?

Quote from: Airidok on Apr 08, 2010, 02:07:46 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 08, 2010, 02:06:07 AM
Well they weren't hopping on two legs, and they weren't generating noise from a large pocket beneath their chin, for starters. And they didn't have fly-catching tongues either.

Ooh, but how do we know that? Just because we didn't see them do it in the film? :P

Sounds about right.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on Apr 08, 2010, 10:55:49 AM
I remember my first viewing of JP when I was a kid and even then I was confused why they'd use frog DNA and not croc's or bird's. Found out later in the movie it was just a plot device to make dinosaurs able to change sexes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 08, 2010, 08:09:37 PM
Quote from: SM on Apr 08, 2010, 02:05:07 AM
QuoteAgain, in the context of the film, the frog DNA didn't affect their behaviour, physical makeup, etc.

How do we know that without a point of comparison?

Ok, let's go back to this. What would we be comparing it to?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 08, 2010, 08:10:41 PM
Complete absence of feathers in Raptors would be a start. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 08, 2010, 08:11:58 PM
Except that they really did have feathers in reality.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 08, 2010, 08:13:24 PM
That's the frog DNA that affected their phisical makeup.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 08, 2010, 08:15:47 PM
No it's not.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 08, 2010, 08:16:02 PM
How do you know?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 08, 2010, 08:16:57 PM
Because raptors in reality, really did have feathers. That has nothing to do with frog DNA, that's all about the designers changing the way they present the creature.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Airidok on Apr 08, 2010, 10:24:26 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 08, 2010, 08:09:37 PM
Quote from: SM on Apr 08, 2010, 02:05:07 AM
QuoteAgain, in the context of the film, the frog DNA didn't affect their behaviour, physical makeup, etc.

How do we know that without a point of comparison?

Ok, let's go back to this. What would we be comparing it to?

That would be my question as well. We can only assume that SM has some secret dinosaur experiments going on in his basement and created several different dinosaurs based on the ones seen in "Jurassic Park" so that he can compare them? :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on Apr 09, 2010, 08:51:43 AM
Very few people thought of raptors being feathered in that time.
Not to mention audiences would be like: "WTF?" if they had feathers in the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: x2SMONEY on Apr 09, 2010, 12:06:58 PM
What more can you do with the franchise. :-\I mean,okay,we get it,there is an island and it has dinosaurs.There is not much more they can do.I'd go see it,but I'm just sort of sceptic that they'll make it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 09, 2010, 12:09:23 PM
Sorna Dinosaurs on continent.
In a Reign of Fire fashion.
WIN.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Apr 09, 2010, 02:02:22 PM
huh. i find it hard to believe that dinosaurs could spread so fast without some army "procesing" them in a day or two.

maybe they should follow the comics and get some raptors and whatnot lost in the amazon jungle.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 09, 2010, 02:07:43 PM
Fook realism.
I want Dinosaurs to spread!! :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 09, 2010, 02:41:08 PM
Quote from: Puks on Apr 09, 2010, 08:51:43 AM
Very few people thought of raptors being feathered in that time.
Not to mention audiences would be like: "WTF?" if they had feathers in the movie.

Prior to the late 90s, yes. And the audience is largely comprised of people who just say "dinosaurs, durrrrr" so them saying WTF is nothing to worry about.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Apr 22, 2010, 12:57:59 AM
I'm ready for another Jurassic Park 4 update.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Apr 22, 2010, 12:59:24 AM
You didn't say the magic word.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Apr 22, 2010, 01:02:52 AM
"PLEASE! GODAMMIT! I hate this hacker crap!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Apr 22, 2010, 01:06:50 AM
Touché   :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Apr 22, 2010, 01:54:02 AM
Anybody want a, uh, soda or something?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 22, 2010, 01:57:04 AM
Soda.

I defy your JP knowledge.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Apr 22, 2010, 01:58:41 AM
Ehhhh... No wonder you're extinct!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Apr 22, 2010, 01:58:53 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 22, 2010, 01:57:04 AM
Soda.

I defy your JP knowledge.

What're you talking about? ;)

I always liked this one:

No! No! NO!!! AAAAAAAAUUUUAAAGAHHAGHHAHAGHUAUG!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 22, 2010, 02:19:22 AM
Best line from the entire series: John, if the Pirates of the Caribbean breaks down, the pirates don't eat the tourists.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Apr 22, 2010, 02:23:39 AM
Nah I always thought "Now eventually you might have dinosaurs on your, on your dinosaur tour, right? Hello?" was better.

And "Must go faster!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Apr 22, 2010, 02:38:11 AM
"Life finds a way," is always good, too. My personal favourite, however:

"Clever girl..."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 22, 2010, 02:46:49 AM
Quote from: SM on Apr 22, 2010, 02:23:39 AM
Nah I always thought "Now eventually you might have dinosaurs on your, on your dinosaur tour, right? Hello?" was better.

And "Must go faster!"

"When you gotta go, you gotta go" is another unforgettable one, though I wouldn't say it's one of the best.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Apr 22, 2010, 02:47:46 AM
They're all good.

As a side note, I love how often this thread just becomes us saying quotes from the film.  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Apr 22, 2010, 02:54:06 AM
*Grant grabs the rope*

"Lex you choke me!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Apr 22, 2010, 02:55:15 AM
"Well, we're in the car again."

"At least we're not in the tree."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Apr 22, 2010, 02:57:14 AM
"Quiet all of you! They're approaching the Tyrannosaur paddock."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Apr 22, 2010, 03:08:38 AM
"Shoot her!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Apr 22, 2010, 03:14:41 AM
Let's not forget...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JFfN5pKzFU
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Apr 22, 2010, 03:15:48 AM
"Pushing team move in there! I want tazers on full charge!"

*Pushing team moves in*

"And push!"

*Team pushes, raptor growls. Team is shaken*

"Hey, Loading Team step away. Jeffery raise the gate."

------
I absolutely love the opening of this film, and when the camera first pans on Muldoon with his badass Shotgun.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Apr 22, 2010, 03:18:35 AM
Muldoon was awesome, in both the book and film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Apr 22, 2010, 03:27:00 AM
"If we split up I'm going with you guys."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: XenoVC on Apr 22, 2010, 03:52:09 AM
Quote from: SM on Apr 22, 2010, 03:27:00 AM
"If we split up I'm going with you guys."

JP3 does have it's small share of cute quips!  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Apr 22, 2010, 11:16:36 AM
Heh heh heh harrgh, ha - harrgh. Ha harrgh, ha haaargh eh!   
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Apr 22, 2010, 05:20:24 PM
exactly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 22, 2010, 05:21:34 PM
Life will find a way.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Apr 22, 2010, 05:25:12 PM
"the thing is, you are alive, when they start to eat you."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 22, 2010, 05:25:33 PM
"God creates dinosaurs. God destroys dinosaurs. God creates man. Man destroys God.
Man creates dinosaurs... "
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 22, 2010, 05:27:14 PM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Apr 22, 2010, 05:25:12 PM
"the thing is, you are alive, when they start to eat you."
But before, he slashes at you with this – a six-inch retractable claw, like a razor, on the middle toe.

Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 22, 2010, 05:25:33 PM
"God creates dinosaurs. God destroys dinosaurs. God creates man. Man destroys God.
Man creates dinosaurs... "
Dinosaurs eat man... Woman inherits the Earth.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 22, 2010, 08:37:05 PM
Quote from: SM on Apr 22, 2010, 03:27:00 AM
"If we split up I'm going with you guys."

Well sure. He didn't want that Tricycloplot to get him :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 22, 2010, 08:39:05 PM
When you gotta go, you gotta go.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 22, 2010, 08:43:02 PM
Just for the record I wish (because I know it won't happen) that James Horner would take the helm at scoring the next film. John Williams preferbaly but I'd love to hear Horner's take on the theme.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJRotVl2IJ8&feature=related
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Apr 25, 2010, 11:18:04 PM
The Jurassic Park graphic novel adaptation is being re-released in November.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 25, 2010, 11:43:23 PM
Wow! That's cool! I have issue one of that series, issue 1 or Raptors, and issues 2-4 of Raptors Attack.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: cloverfan98 on Apr 26, 2010, 12:53:28 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 25, 2010, 11:43:23 PM
Wow! That's cool! I have issue one of that series, issue 1 or Raptors, and issues 2-4 of Raptors Attack.

IDW will be re relasing the old Topps series in new TPB and they will also be releasing a new original JP seres called Redemption this summer.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Apr 26, 2010, 01:10:39 AM
Here's an article about Jurassic Park Redemption.
http://comics.ign.com/articles/107/1079284p1.html
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 26, 2010, 01:37:41 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 22, 2010, 08:43:02 PM
Just for the record I wish (because I know it won't happen) that James Horner would take the helm at scoring the next film. John Williams preferbaly but I'd love to hear Horner's take on the theme.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJRotVl2IJ8&feature=related

Is that for certain?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Apr 26, 2010, 02:09:56 AM
Quote from: Skinner on Apr 26, 2010, 01:10:39 AM
Here's an article about Jurassic Park Redemption.
http://comics.ign.com/articles/107/1079284p1.html

I may have to visit a comic store for the first time and pick that up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 26, 2010, 04:25:46 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 26, 2010, 01:37:41 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 22, 2010, 08:43:02 PM
Just for the record I wish (because I know it won't happen) that James Horner would take the helm at scoring the next film. John Williams preferbaly but I'd love to hear Horner's take on the theme.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJRotVl2IJ8&feature=related

Is that for certain?

Yep I think he'd churn out a classic soundtrack.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 26, 2010, 07:30:43 PM
No, what I meant was, is Horner confirmed?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 26, 2010, 08:09:14 PM
Horner?
Meh.
Bakker FTW!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 26, 2010, 10:25:19 PM
^ QFT. Horner gets on my nerves, especially with his "T.Rex was only a scavenger" schtick.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Apr 26, 2010, 10:30:40 PM
Theyre talking about james horner the composer not jack horner the paleontologist
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 26, 2010, 11:02:52 PM
I know. But I still felt like answering.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Apr 29, 2010, 11:34:10 PM
How come no one here likes Jack Horner? Because of his "T-Rex was a scavenger" theory?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 30, 2010, 03:54:23 AM
That's the bulk of it for me, yeah. Along with the fact that he has publicly and explicitly stated that he will refuse to acknowledge any evidence contrary to that idea. He's a douche bag.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dark Passenger on Apr 30, 2010, 04:51:52 AM
^ also that he said a spino could easily kill a rex, i mean c'mon spino's a god damn fish eater with flimsy jaws.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Apr 30, 2010, 05:03:28 AM
They're all GM.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 30, 2010, 05:11:47 AM
GM?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Apr 30, 2010, 05:26:16 AM
Genetically Modified.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 30, 2010, 07:09:55 AM
What does that have to do with Horner's theories?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Apr 30, 2010, 07:17:56 AM
Well they're just that - theories.  No one truly knows exactly which dinosaur did what - it's all (simply put) educated guesses.

And then if the JP films present the (GM) dinosaurs wrong (because of course they're documentaries - apparently) people get all bent out of shape and start blaming Horner.

(I don't have a vested interest in the guy (just parentheses), but one should never forget a) Horner - nor anyone else - can't make definative statements about dinosaur behaviour; and b) it's only a movie),
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 30, 2010, 07:22:08 AM
But he rejects anything that contradicts his own views. His theory about being T.Rex being only a scavenger has been disproven time and again, but he continues to maintain it out of, what seems at this point, to be sheer arrogance.

As for Spino vs. Rex, we can make educated guesses based on what we know of each creature. Since the fight ultimately comes down to jaw power since that's how the fight will end, T.Rex has the advantage. T.Rex also has the most robust and powerful tooth design of any carnivorous dinosaur, so that adds to the argument.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Apr 30, 2010, 02:37:11 PM
Its pointless going into detail about the dinosaurs of Jurassic Park because some of them are miles away from reality anyway but who cares. We know Velociraptors are the size of turkeys yet in this film theyre 6ft tall and much closer to a Deinonychus but that doesnt ruin my enjoyment. What ruined my enjoyment a little bit was when they redisgned the Raptors for JPIII to make them more like the real ones. Whats the point? Theyre still miles away from a real Raptor would be like so why change that awesome menacing design from the first film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 30, 2010, 03:54:23 PM
A size difference isn't as glaring and as preposterous as going against an established fact in that T.Rex had stronger jaws. It's so blatantly changed in the film that it can aggravate even casual dino buffs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Apr 30, 2010, 06:23:02 PM
A size difference isnt as glaring? So making an animal/dinosaur 5 or 6 times as big isnt obvious? And the T-Rex had stronger Jaws than what?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sylizar on Apr 30, 2010, 09:09:44 PM
Another thing going for the Spino though, was that it WAS bigger. It could've just knocked the T.Rex over and just stepped on his head a few times.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Apr 30, 2010, 09:49:03 PM
So? I'm bigger than a wolverine; doesn't mean I could kill it easily.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Apr 30, 2010, 10:35:52 PM
Use a gun.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Apr 30, 2010, 10:39:52 PM
Well, yeah. But I'm talking mano-e-small furry creature.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Apr 30, 2010, 10:44:58 PM
...

Use a chainsaw.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Apr 30, 2010, 10:51:58 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fapi.ning.com%2Ffiles%2F6kCQDFTSAbJuOnnE7ErotKMIXoXPxgUP8VN0Gk9NTP5ZZATsQKO9%2AvYur7Zcq8cj531bFs0BUXcZLtYEuUp5Vn7yEzufOspf%2Fjon.stewart.facepalm.jpg&hash=b1ff9abff281ab73e7d5e779db0f91faa28b775c)

Never mind.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on May 01, 2010, 12:53:51 AM
i killed a dog once by letting it bite my hand and then pushing my arm down his throat.

it was a very big dog.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 01, 2010, 01:11:23 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi222.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fdd50%2Fjeansalomon1%2F2001DaveBowman.jpg&hash=bf982638f7c49a1315f220e1b861d8e99f797610)

Good for you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 01, 2010, 06:53:14 AM
Quote from: Keg on Apr 30, 2010, 06:23:02 PM
A size difference isnt as glaring? So making an animal/dinosaur 5 or 6 times as big isnt obvious? And the T-Rex had stronger Jaws than what?

The size difference isn't that major. Spinosaurus was at least 2 tons heavier than T.Rex, but in terms of physical height, the sail accounts for most of the extra height along with Spino's tail making up at least 40% of its length. And when I say stronger jaws, I mean strongest jaws of any land predator in history. The only two creatures with jaws more powerful than those of a T.Rex were Megalodon and Dunkleosteus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Pointman on May 01, 2010, 07:09:29 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 01, 2010, 06:53:14 AM
Quote from: Keg on Apr 30, 2010, 06:23:02 PM
A size difference isnt as glaring? So making an animal/dinosaur 5 or 6 times as big isnt obvious? And the T-Rex had stronger Jaws than what?

The size difference isn't that major. Spinosaurus was at least 2 tons heavier than T.Rex, but in terms of physical height, the sail accounts for most of the extra height along with Spino's tail making up at least 40% of its length. And when I say stronger jaws, I mean strongest jaws of any land predator in history. The only two creatures with jaws more powerful than those of a T.Rex were Megalodon and Dunkleosteus.

You mean these guys?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi257.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fhh225%2Ffalco3344%2FMegalodon_Foto.jpg&hash=913f42450f5bdc61197d6726af46ff902533fb3a)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi257.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fhh225%2Ffalco3344%2F5d75b942ab4bd73L.jpg&hash=66346f60ec78e98fc76af0255d1baeea4837cc2e)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 01, 2010, 07:16:40 AM
Yeup.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on May 01, 2010, 11:58:54 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 01, 2010, 06:53:14 AM
Quote from: Keg on Apr 30, 2010, 06:23:02 PM
A size difference isnt as glaring? So making an animal/dinosaur 5 or 6 times as big isnt obvious? And the T-Rex had stronger Jaws than what?

The size difference isn't that major. Spinosaurus was at least 2 tons heavier than T.Rex, but in terms of physical height, the sail accounts for most of the extra height along with Spino's tail making up at least 40% of its length. And when I say stronger jaws, I mean strongest jaws of any land predator in history. The only two creatures with jaws more powerful than those of a T.Rex were Megalodon and Dunkleosteus.

I wasnt referring to the size difference of the Spinosaurus. I was commenting on how people complain about the T-Rex not being able to beat the Spinosaurus. They say its massively innacurate because it has stronger jaws. So what? A boxer who has the stronger punch isnt guaranteed victory in every fight.

Yet these same people who complain about this arent bothered by the size difference of the Raptors compared to what they are in real life. The Raptors in the film are absolutely nothing like Velociraptors in reality. They're 5 or 6 times as big for a start. Yet nobody complains about that, but they bitch about the T-Rex not being able to beat the Spino.

What i'm saying is that the complete misinterpretation of the Velociraptor goes without scrutiny yet we get people whining on about one dinosaur being killed by another when its clearly the stronger of the two. Being the strongest, fastest, most agile etc doesnt mean its going to win every fight does it.

The hoorah over the Spinosaur is basically T-Rex fanboyism gone mad. You can't complain about one thing being innacurate and against the established facts and then ignore another that is arguably alot worse.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 01, 2010, 03:27:39 PM
Yes, we can. I grew up with velociraptors looking like that, so I'm fine with it. I also grew up with the T Rex being the baddest motherf**ker of them all. The Spino fight essentially took my childhood, and beat it with a tire iron. That is why I'm upset with it. They didn't even make it a close fight! If they'd at least done that, maybe we wouldn't have cared as much.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on May 01, 2010, 04:08:01 PM
On that level I agree. What i'm disagreeing with is people using evidence as facts against the whole spino vs t-rex argument. Its pointless because JP has taken liberties for the sake of entertainment since the first movie. I agree and feel the same way that they shouldnt of killed off the t-rex like that and made the spino the main dino, but theres no point in bringing science into the argument and complaining about which one would have beaten which, because we all know that the science of it is screwed up way more than that in other areas. If you argue to the death that the T-Rex should have have won on the basis that it would be more accurate to the facts then you should also argue the Raptor should have been the size of a turkey.

I didnt like the direction JPIII went with the Spinosaurus as much as anyone but trying to bring facts into the argument is stupid. Its double standards if youre going to throw facts around to argue about something you didnt like, but then ignore the facts when its something you do like.

But for the record I whole heartedly agree with your statement. It was like taking an icon of the cinema and then belittling it. Hopefully with JP4 they'll realise that mistake and bring back the T-Rex as the main bad ass.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 01, 2010, 04:09:55 PM
Personally, how I get around the whole velociraptor size thing is with the mosquitoes. The blood in it was from a dinosaur that either hasn't been discovered yet, or hasn't been preserved in the fossil record. Problem solved.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Lt. Mike Harrigan on May 01, 2010, 04:13:47 PM
But that can then also be applied to Spinosaurus...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 01, 2010, 04:24:48 PM
How? It's a documented species, that we have discovered and know a fair bit about. We know that spinosauruses existed, and we know what one's skeletal structure would look like. We can also make fairly educated guesses about how strong it could be.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on May 01, 2010, 04:36:54 PM
How about you dont bother justifying anything with science. How about you simply say "i dont care that the velociraptors are too big because theyre awesome, but i do care that they made the Spino more powerful than the T-Rex because it was like seeing a favourite movie monster being ridiculed".

Trying to justify an argument with the science behind the facts and then ignoring something else just because it suits you, is always going to result in a pedantic dick like me pulling you on the matter  ;)

We love the Raptors and we hate the way the T-Rex was played down in JPIII. f**k the science. Thats all there is to it. Im not going to justify my opinion by saying it shouldnt have happened that way because then id be a hypocrite for accepting the raptors.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 01, 2010, 04:37:27 PM
Quote from: Keg on May 01, 2010, 11:58:54 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 01, 2010, 06:53:14 AM
Quote from: Keg on Apr 30, 2010, 06:23:02 PM
A size difference isnt as glaring? So making an animal/dinosaur 5 or 6 times as big isnt obvious? And the T-Rex had stronger Jaws than what?

The size difference isn't that major. Spinosaurus was at least 2 tons heavier than T.Rex, but in terms of physical height, the sail accounts for most of the extra height along with Spino's tail making up at least 40% of its length. And when I say stronger jaws, I mean strongest jaws of any land predator in history. The only two creatures with jaws more powerful than those of a T.Rex were Megalodon and Dunkleosteus.

I wasnt referring to the size difference of the Spinosaurus. I was commenting on how people complain about the T-Rex not being able to beat the Spinosaurus. They say its massively innacurate because it has stronger jaws. So what? A boxer who has the stronger punch isnt guaranteed victory in every fight.

Yet these same people who complain about this arent bothered by the size difference of the Raptors compared to what they are in real life. The Raptors in the film are absolutely nothing like Velociraptors in reality. They're 5 or 6 times as big for a start. Yet nobody complains about that, but they bitch about the T-Rex not being able to beat the Spino.

What i'm saying is that the complete misinterpretation of the Velociraptor goes without scrutiny yet we get people whining on about one dinosaur being killed by another when its clearly the stronger of the two. Being the strongest, fastest, most agile etc doesnt mean its going to win every fight does it.

The hoorah over the Spinosaur is basically T-Rex fanboyism gone mad. You can't complain about one thing being innacurate and against the established facts and then ignore another that is arguably alot worse.

Yes I can complain, because when the T.Rex had the Spino by the neck, that's game freaking over. Any paleontologist will tell you that. I realize it's a movie, but there are some liberties, that when taken are just flat out stupid. It completely ignores scientific fact.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on May 01, 2010, 04:45:11 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 01, 2010, 04:37:27 PM

Yes I can complain, because when the T.Rex had the Spino by the neck, that's game freaking over. Any paleontologist will tell you that. I realize it's a movie, but there are some liberties, that when taken are just flat out stupid. It completely ignores scientific fact.

Have you read anything ive just said? The Raptors being 6ft tall completely ignores scientific fact. So why aren't you up in arms about that if scientific fact is so important. Completely disregarding everything that scientific fact tells us about the Velociraptor for 3 whole movies is alot worse than taking liberties in a 3 minute segment of one of them. We dont complain about the liberties taken with the Raptor because we loved them.

Im not disagreeing the Spino Vs Rex fight almost single handedly ruined my childhood but i'm not about to bring facts into the argument because that would make me hypocritical unless I also got annoyed by all of the other liberties that where taken. I dont liek it anymore than you do believe me but i'm not about to have one rule for the things I like and another for things I dont.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 01, 2010, 04:48:12 PM
You're right, but I guess the reason I'm not making too big a scene over it is because the T.Rex being weakened like that completely overshadows it. They way I see it, I'm watching Deinonychus in all three movies. They just happened to be called Velociraptor since the name is more exotic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 01, 2010, 04:53:47 PM
Quote from: Keg on May 01, 2010, 04:36:54 PM
How about you dont bother justifying anything with science. How about you simply say "i dont care that the velociraptors are too big because theyre awesome, but i do care that they made the Spino more powerful than the T-Rex because it was like seeing a favourite movie monster being ridiculed".

Trying to justify an argument with the science behind the facts and then ignoring something else just because it suits you, is always going to result in a pedantic dick like me pulling you on the matter  ;)

We love the Raptors and we hate the way the T-Rex was played down in JPIII. f**k the science. Thats all there is to it. Im not going to justify my opinion by saying it shouldnt have happened that way because then id be a hypocrite for accepting the raptors.

Except I came up with a perfectly good excuse for the velociraptor thing; the spinosaurus fight has no such validity.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: cloverfan98 on May 01, 2010, 04:55:43 PM
I'm with all the T Rex lovers. I liked the Spino as a change in pace and he was pretty cool, but I still perfer the T rex any day. And the fight should have been much longer. Instead it felt like it was 7 seconds long.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on May 01, 2010, 04:59:00 PM
I just really, really hope they give us something awesome involving the T-Rex in the next film to make up for it.

I really think they missed a trick with the opening few scenes of carnage in JPIII. Everything could of happened exactly the same as it did with the plane crashing into the Spino's tail and them being thrown around in the plane and then chased into the forest. When that T-Rex reared its head above the carcass im convinced the whole audience thought it would come out, battle the Spino and kill it. If that had happened, the T-Rex becomes even more fearful in the eyes of the audience and they love it even more. The T-Rex should have then replaced the Spino in all of the scenes it featured in until the end of the movie.

Instead they killed off a favourite that most people had come to the cinema to see and replaced it with something that, lets face it, just doesnt look anywhere near as good.

Alternatively it could have been the T-Rex that caused the crash and then we would have had alot more action involving the T-Rex. The Spinosaur would take the place of the T-Rex behidn the carcass and then it would kill the T-Rex. At least that way we still got our T-Rex fix and then you get an awesome intro for the Spinosaurus. As it stands the audience gets all excited because the T-Rex has arrived and then a minute later its gone for good and youre left going "what...is that it?". I cant believe the producers couldnt forsee the monumental f**k up with that one.
Quote from: SpaceMarines on May 01, 2010, 04:53:47 PM
Quote from: Keg on May 01, 2010, 04:36:54 PM
How about you dont bother justifying anything with science. How about you simply say "i dont care that the velociraptors are too big because theyre awesome, but i do care that they made the Spino more powerful than the T-Rex because it was like seeing a favourite movie monster being ridiculed".

Trying to justify an argument with the science behind the facts and then ignoring something else just because it suits you, is always going to result in a pedantic dick like me pulling you on the matter  ;)

We love the Raptors and we hate the way the T-Rex was played down in JPIII. f**k the science. Thats all there is to it. Im not going to justify my opinion by saying it shouldnt have happened that way because then id be a hypocrite for accepting the raptors.

Except I came up with a perfectly good excuse for the velociraptor thing; the spinosaurus fight has no such validity.

But its just that, an excuse in your own head to justify it. I could just as easily say, well the Spinosaurus was stronger and bigger as a result of the altered DNA.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 01, 2010, 05:00:30 PM
But state that logically. Mine is fairly reasonable; the overwhelming majority of dinosaur species that existed we have no record of. What's to keep a mosquito from biting one of those?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on May 01, 2010, 05:07:20 PM
But we do have records of Velociraptors and they arent anything like the ones in the movies. This is pointless. I can see that no matter what is said people are going to justify it somehow or other in their head.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 01, 2010, 05:09:57 PM
They aren't actually velociraptors. Or something. I've stated my justification of the poor size-discrepancy. I think it is perfectly logical. I'd like to hear something comparable for the spino T Rex fight.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 01, 2010, 05:10:44 PM
What records?

With regard to the fight, I would have preferred a delayed sequence for later on in the movie. Anyone seen The Valley of Gwangi? In it, an Allosaurus and a Styracosaurus have a brief staredown/roaring contest before they back down which inevitably sets up a fight for later on. The fight occurs when things are already going haywire, namely when the cowboys are lassoing the Allosaur and the Styracosaur shows up and then the fight breaks out. I would have liked to see the Spino and Rex brawl when the humans were in the water and Kirby was busy hanging on to the crane because it would have been more intense.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on May 01, 2010, 05:20:32 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velociraptor

The dinosaurs in Jurassic Park are called Velociraptors and they are nothing at all like the Velociraptor fossils that have been found in mongolia and central asia. Therefore JP took massive liberties with what was known about the Velociraptor. Why is everybody trying to deny this by saying they werent Velociraptors in the movies or whatever. Doesnt matter what you class them as in the movies, the fact remains that they are called velociraptors in the movies and theyre completely and utterly anatomically incorrect compared to actual fossils found. Ignoring this because it suits you, but jumping on the spino/rex thing is hypocritical in my eyes.

You can dislike what happened with the t-rex and spino (hell i do) but its pointless to argue it scientifically as though thats the reason it bothers you, because if that was the case, the raptors depcition in the movie would bother you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 01, 2010, 05:26:09 PM
Not everyone. Just me. Won't you allow me my delusions, at least?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 01, 2010, 05:28:30 PM
They're called Velociraptors, but anyone with any level of dinosaur knowledge will tell you they weren't. They were Deinonychus, plain and simple. Even amateur paleontologists like Donald F. Glut have said this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on May 01, 2010, 05:35:13 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on May 01, 2010, 05:26:09 PM
Not everyone. Just me. Won't you allow me my delusions, at least?

NO  :P





Oh go on then  :D

Quote from: DoomRulz on May 01, 2010, 05:28:30 PM
They're called Velociraptors, but anyone with any level of dinosaur knowledge will tell you they weren't. They were Deinonychus, plain and simple. Even amateur paleontologists like Donald F. Glut have said this.

Most people who watch these movies dont have any dinosaur knowledge other than what movies tell them though. Theyre fiction. To the majority of the audience those things were Raptors when infact theyre not. That to me is the filmmakers taking liberties wether that be on the dinosaur itself or in changing the name. Theyre still not accurate either way.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 01, 2010, 07:24:51 PM
You're right, the audience is comprised of ignorant viewers. But the point is, despite the films intentions, those are still Deinonychus you're seeing. I agree they weren't accurate.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sylizar on May 01, 2010, 09:25:14 PM
Despite all this, I can't be the only person who prefers Spinosaurus over T. Rex. I just really love the way they look.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 01, 2010, 09:29:48 PM
Whether the dinosaurs are accurate or not, I don't let that destroy my enjoyment and love that I have for the films.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on May 01, 2010, 09:33:41 PM
Quote from: Sylizar on May 01, 2010, 09:25:14 PM
Despite all this, I can't be the only person who prefers Spinosaurus over T. Rex. I just really love the way they look.

I prefer the T-Rex overall, but it was nice to have something different in part ///; especially after we'd had them up the wazoo in Lost World.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on May 01, 2010, 09:44:00 PM
Quote from: Sylizar on May 01, 2010, 09:25:14 PM
Despite all this, I can't be the only person who prefers Spinosaurus over T. Rex. I just really love the way they look.
I'd have to say I prefer Spino a little more.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 01, 2010, 11:14:29 PM
Please, no more! My childhood can only take so much! :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on May 01, 2010, 11:33:46 PM
I'm sorry.  ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on May 01, 2010, 11:38:26 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on May 01, 2010, 11:14:29 PM
Please, no more! My childhood can only take so much! :(

Your childhood should have died when Ian Malcolm's daughter started using gymnastics to kill raptors.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 01, 2010, 11:49:04 PM
Quote from: TJ Doc on May 01, 2010, 11:38:26 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on May 01, 2010, 11:14:29 PM
Please, no more! My childhood can only take so much! :(

Your childhood should have died when Ian Malcolm's daughter started using gymnastics to kill raptors.

Mine died when a Raptor was talking to Alan Grant in an airplane.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on May 01, 2010, 11:50:57 PM
ARRRRRGH!!! THAT WAS DREAM!  :D

You can't count that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 01, 2010, 11:51:38 PM
 :D

It was still cheesy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on May 01, 2010, 11:56:32 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jMMrRmCLXo
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on May 01, 2010, 11:58:57 PM
Thank you, Skinner.  :D

Quote from: First Blood on May 01, 2010, 11:51:38 PM
:D

It was still cheesy.

Oh, sure, but at least it didn't take place in (film) reality. And the brutal and clever nature of the actual raptors more than made up for it (I love how they snap Udesky's neck).

In fact, it was almost as though they were trying to make up for getting completely creamed by a ten year old girl.

Oh wait...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Lt. Mike Harrigan on May 02, 2010, 12:00:02 AM
Quote from: Skinner on May 01, 2010, 11:56:32 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jMMrRmCLXo

:D

*wipes tear from eye*

Dude, I swear, I almost wet myself!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 02, 2010, 12:01:30 AM
Quote from: Skinner on May 01, 2010, 11:56:32 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jMMrRmCLXo

I thank you sincerely. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 02, 2010, 12:02:03 AM
 :D :D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg2rgTA7s3U
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 02, 2010, 12:03:14 AM
What the... ???
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 02, 2010, 12:03:48 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on May 02, 2010, 12:03:14 AM
What the... ???

I don't know.  :D

I just came across it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on May 02, 2010, 12:05:12 AM
That was just wrong.  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 02, 2010, 12:06:53 AM
Quote from: TJ Doc on May 02, 2010, 12:05:12 AM
That was just wrong.  :D

;D
On a side note...when the Rex attacks the Camper, I love how the door *suddenly* becomes jammed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on May 02, 2010, 12:10:14 AM
How (in)convenient, eh?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 02, 2010, 12:13:00 AM
Quote from: TJ Doc on May 02, 2010, 12:10:14 AM
How (in)convenient, eh?

And who's idea was it to set up base camp at the *edge* of a 100 ft cliff  ???

Ahhh! I am ruining this movie that I love so much by pointing out its flaws... :-X
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on May 02, 2010, 12:15:48 AM
Can't set up camp on a game trail, but can set it up right next to a water hole.  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 02, 2010, 12:18:13 AM
Quote from: Skinner on May 02, 2010, 12:15:48 AM
Can't set up camp on a game trail, but can set it up right next to a water hole.  :P

Shame....Ludlow should have listened to Burke (guy with the beard and cowboy hat). He was the Dino expert.  :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on May 02, 2010, 12:21:15 AM
Would you trust a guy that would run right into the jaws of a t-rex, because there is a small snake on him?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 02, 2010, 12:21:49 AM
Quote from: Skinner on May 02, 2010, 12:21:15 AM
Would you trust a guy that would run right into the jaws of a t-rex, because there is a small snake on him?

:D

Good point.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hive Tyrant on May 02, 2010, 12:27:29 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 01, 2010, 04:48:12 PM
You're right, but I guess the reason I'm not making too big a scene over it is because the T.Rex being weakened like that completely overshadows it. They way I see it, I'm watching Deinonychus in all three movies. They just happened to be called Velociraptor since the name is more exotic.

At the time JP was written, Deinonychus was still called Velociraptor. Not necessarily a scientific inaccuracy -- merely outdated information that was not updated in order to stick true to the names of the novel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on May 02, 2010, 12:28:31 AM
I still don't understand how the T-Rex can get into a camp full of people who are probably too scared to sleep, and yet not wake anybody!

And the first film makes such a big deal about the whole "Boom! BOOM! BOOM!" thing, so...



Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 02, 2010, 12:30:37 AM
Quote from: TJ Doc on May 02, 2010, 12:28:31 AM
I still don't understand how the T-Rex can get into a camp full of people who are probably too scared to sleep, and yet not wake anybody!

And the first film makes such a big deal about the whole "Boom! BOOM! BOOM!" thing, so...

Yea, what's even more baffling is that there's no BOOM BOOM BOOM when it saves Grant and Co at the finale of Jurassic Park 1!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on May 02, 2010, 12:40:22 AM
And that! There are major inconsistencies all over this trilogy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hive Tyrant on May 02, 2010, 12:47:37 AM
Does it matter?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 02, 2010, 12:49:56 AM
Quote from: Hive Tyrant on May 02, 2010, 12:47:37 AM
Does it matter?

Not to me. It's one of my favorite franchises of all time. I don't don't really let Dino inaccuracies or other things bother me. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on May 02, 2010, 12:51:18 AM
I find it can matter. I won't complain when something small and insignificant happens, but there are numerous and outright blatant logical errors with these films that really stick out.

It's distracting.  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 02, 2010, 12:54:05 AM
Quote from: TJ Doc on May 02, 2010, 12:51:18 AM
I find it can matter. I won't complain when something small and insignificant happens, but there are numerous and outright blatant logical errors with these films that really stick out.

It's distracting.  :-\

The only thing that bothers me, everything else I can live with; but when the T-Rex paddock turns into a 50ft drop. I read an explanation for that somewhere but I wasn't convinced.  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on May 02, 2010, 12:55:44 AM
Quote from: First Blood on May 02, 2010, 12:54:05 AM
The only thing that bothers me, everything else I can live with; but when the T-Rex paddock turns into a 50ft drop. I read an explanation for that somewhere but I wasn't convinced.  :-\

Oh christ... I'd happily forgotten about that.  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 02, 2010, 12:56:53 AM
Isla Nublar is a mysterious place.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 02, 2010, 12:58:18 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on May 02, 2010, 12:56:53 AM
Isla Nublar is a mysterious place.

Island from Lost?  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 02, 2010, 01:11:01 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fnobodyputsbabyinahorner.files.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F11%2F1238157980_scanners_-_head_explosion.gif&hash=f798ecac2334510322f3e58e2aafe7af574b5f6a)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 02, 2010, 01:12:46 AM
Hey ya never know with that place.   :D

Hammond could have built the park on it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hive Tyrant on May 02, 2010, 01:22:33 AM
It does make sense, actually -- the 50-ft-drop scene. The angles and editing is just really, really awkward.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on May 02, 2010, 01:26:30 AM
Quote from: First Blood on May 02, 2010, 12:58:18 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on May 02, 2010, 12:56:53 AM
Isla Nublar is a mysterious place.

Island from Lost?  :D
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg411.imageshack.us%2Fimg411%2F9195%2Flost11.jpg&hash=ebaf5c54da083d6dc847e29e53f6cc131489bf3a)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 02, 2010, 01:27:56 AM
You see, if they had a T Rex on the island, then maybe I'd watch that show.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 02, 2010, 05:36:06 AM
Quote from: First Blood on May 02, 2010, 12:54:05 AM
Quote from: TJ Doc on May 02, 2010, 12:51:18 AM
I find it can matter. I won't complain when something small and insignificant happens, but there are numerous and outright blatant logical errors with these films that really stick out.

It's distracting.  :-\

The only thing that bothers me, everything else I can live with; but when the T-Rex paddock turns into a 50ft drop. I read an explanation for that somewhere but I wasn't convinced.  :-\

You mean this? (http://www.jplegacy.org/home2.php?load=jurassicpark/ffjpking.shtml)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sylizar on May 02, 2010, 04:34:55 PM
Wouldn't this have been a better Spino?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.neoseeker.com%2Fmgv%2F442838-RHJ44%2F838%2F48%2Fspinosaurus_eagyptiacus_display.jpg&hash=abb822dcb50e981ecd2dd8e629d12874a583fddd)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 02, 2010, 06:22:30 PM
No. It's a Spinosaurus, not a Spinosaurus crossed with a rooster.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Lt. Mike Harrigan on May 02, 2010, 06:36:09 PM
... or a Spinosaurus crossed with Godzilla for that matter!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Captain Salt on May 03, 2010, 09:05:42 PM
Info on Issue 2 on the new comic series:

Lex and Tim Murphy, the well-to-do grandchildren of dearly departed John Hammond, are all grown up and carrying on Hammond's legacy. While Lex is quelling a public outcry to re-open Jurassic Park, Tim is secretly helping create a new batch of kinder, gentler dinosaurs that are currently hatching in a secret location... until one leaves the nest and begins tearing up a small Texas town!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdecomicshop.nl%2Fimages%2FMAY10%2Fjurassic-park-redemption-2-may100362.jpg&hash=fdd37cb9f1d35fafb14c858989d44b960fb89f05)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdecomicshop.nl%2Fimages%2FMAY10%2Fjurassic-park-redemption-2-10-copy-incv-cvr-may100363.jpg&hash=d7b9586c58621ce38863a972520b616814cfb494)

http://decomicshop.nl/jurassic-park-redemption-p-30768.html
Looks awesome! I can't wait for this...finally, some new JP stories!  8) :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Lt. Mike Harrigan on May 03, 2010, 09:17:20 PM
Quote from: Captain Salt on May 03, 2010, 09:05:42 PM
Info on Issue 2 on the new comic series:

Lex and Tim Murphy, the well-to-do grandchildren of dearly departed John Hammond, are all grown up and carrying on Hammond's legacy. While Lex is quelling a public outcry to re-open Jurassic Park, Tim is secretly helping create a new batch of kinder, gentler dinosaurs that are currently hatching in a secret location... until one leaves the nest and begins tearing up a small Texas town!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdecomicshop.nl%2Fimages%2FMAY10%2Fjurassic-park-redemption-2-may100362.jpg&hash=fdd37cb9f1d35fafb14c858989d44b960fb89f05)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdecomicshop.nl%2Fimages%2FMAY10%2Fjurassic-park-redemption-2-10-copy-incv-cvr-may100363.jpg&hash=d7b9586c58621ce38863a972520b616814cfb494)

http://decomicshop.nl/jurassic-park-redemption-p-30768.html
Looks awesome! I can't wait for this...finally, some new JP stories!  8) :o

The hell? Sounds like The Lost World: Jurassic Park all over again!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 03, 2010, 09:34:50 PM
Marine reptiles should be in the new movie. Add some flavour damn it!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on May 03, 2010, 09:40:35 PM
Hell yeah. Get the Plesiosaur involved somehow.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on May 03, 2010, 09:41:32 PM
QuoteLex and Tim Murphy, the well-to-do grandchildren of dearly departed John Hammond, are all grown up and carrying on Hammond's legacy. While Lex is quelling a public outcry to re-open Jurassic Park, Tim is secretly helping create a new batch of kinder, gentler dinosaurs that are currently hatching in a secret location... until one leaves the nest and begins tearing up a small Texas town!
I don't really like that idea. I'd rather go back to Isla Nublar.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 03, 2010, 09:42:11 PM
Damn those kids! You think after the horrors they experienced they would not want anything to do with Dinosaurs again.  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on May 03, 2010, 09:43:38 PM
It would take Tim years of therapy to get over what he went through.

Even Sam Jackson had it easy compared to him...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 03, 2010, 09:43:57 PM
Their young minds saw an opportunity!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on May 03, 2010, 09:45:58 PM
Do you think Tim would actually do something like this after what he experienced?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 03, 2010, 09:56:31 PM
Quote from: Skinner on May 03, 2010, 09:45:58 PM
Do you think Tim would actually do something like this after what he experienced?

I think he had it worst than most of the characters (that survived). Grant, Malcolm, Lex, Ellie, Hammond.

The thought alone, of being stuck in an SUV and fall over a really high ledge and then becoming lodged in a tree would make me crap my pants!

Then only to be chased by the falling SUV when climbing down.  :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 03, 2010, 09:56:50 PM
Quote from: Skinner on May 03, 2010, 09:45:58 PM
Do you think Tim would actually do something like this after what he experienced?

It would explain the gentler dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: brennan4 on May 03, 2010, 10:06:54 PM
Quote from: Captain Salt on May 03, 2010, 09:05:42 PM
Info on Issue 2 on the new comic series:

Lex and Tim Murphy, the well-to-do grandchildren of dearly departed John Hammond, are all grown up and carrying on Hammond's legacy. While Lex is quelling a public outcry to re-open Jurassic Park, Tim is secretly helping create a new batch of kinder, gentler dinosaurs that are currently hatching in a secret location... until one leaves the nest and begins tearing up a small Texas town!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdecomicshop.nl%2Fimages%2FMAY10%2Fjurassic-park-redemption-2-may100362.jpg&hash=fdd37cb9f1d35fafb14c858989d44b960fb89f05)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdecomicshop.nl%2Fimages%2FMAY10%2Fjurassic-park-redemption-2-10-copy-incv-cvr-may100363.jpg&hash=d7b9586c58621ce38863a972520b616814cfb494)

http://decomicshop.nl/jurassic-park-redemption-p-30768.html
Looks awesome! I can't wait for this...finally, some new JP stories!  8) :o
Dear god am I excited about this comic. I've been saying for years ( to nobody in particular) how good an idea this would be and they finally do it when I least expect it.  What's more, it's about Tim and Lex, the one plotline I really would like to see in a sequel, as theey're the only survivors who haven't gone back. W0000000T! ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on May 03, 2010, 10:14:47 PM
Actually, Ellie never went back :P

But these comics look cool! I'm interested in reading all the other Jurassic Park comics now. I have a few, but no complete sets.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: brennan4 on May 03, 2010, 10:32:04 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on May 03, 2010, 10:14:47 PM
Actually, Ellie never went back :P

But these comics look cool! I'm interested in reading all the other Jurassic Park comics now. I have a few, but no complete sets.
I think they're available for download on the internet. It's not illegal because the company that made them is defunct. However, the adaptation of the first movie will be a graphic novel in September.
http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Jurassic-Park/Walter-Simonson/e/9781600107603/?itm=1&USRI=jurassic+park+graphic+novel
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on May 03, 2010, 10:35:19 PM
Quote from: brennan4 on May 03, 2010, 10:32:04 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on May 03, 2010, 10:14:47 PM
Actually, Ellie never went back :P

But these comics look cool! I'm interested in reading all the other Jurassic Park comics now. I have a few, but no complete sets.
I think they're available for download on the internet. It's not illegal because the company that made them is defunct. However, the adaptation of the first movie will be a graphic novel in September.
http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Jurassic-Park/Walter-Simonson/e/9781600107603/?itm=1&USRI=jurassic+park+graphic+novel

Cool! I have the first issue of the adaptation, 1 of Raptors, and 2, 3 and 4 of Raptors Attack.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: brennan4 on May 03, 2010, 10:40:10 PM
JPLegacy should be able to help you out with getting the rest.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Pointman on May 03, 2010, 11:28:32 PM
Quote from: First Blood on May 03, 2010, 09:56:31 PM
Quote from: Skinner on May 03, 2010, 09:45:58 PM
Do you think Tim would actually do something like this after what he experienced?

I think he had it worst than most of the characters (that survived). Grant, Malcolm, Lex, Ellie, Hammond.

The thought alone, of being stuck in an SUV and fall over a really high ledge and then becoming lodged in a tree would make me crap my pants!

Then only to be chased by the falling SUV when climbing down.  :o

Also, just think if you were in his shoes when the T-Rex and Raptors attacked him and Lex. Not to mention being electrocuted. Miracle he survived THAT.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 03, 2010, 11:35:47 PM
Heh, I forgot about him being electrocuted, poor Tim  :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on May 03, 2010, 11:37:47 PM
Quote from: First Blood on May 03, 2010, 11:35:47 PM
Heh, I forgot about him being electrocuted, poor Tim  :'(

That boy got scarred for life so much in that park. And I don't think he even made physical contact with a dinosaur!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 03, 2010, 11:40:40 PM
He may have touched the sick Triceratops. But that was before his life turned into a living hell!

:D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on May 03, 2010, 11:46:43 PM
He looked fine in The Lost World so it must not have scarred him too badly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on May 03, 2010, 11:48:03 PM
Quote from: Skinner on May 03, 2010, 11:46:43 PM
He looked fine in The Lost World so it must not have scarred him too badly.

Therapy :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 03, 2010, 11:55:09 PM
The tree sequence was a joke. Let's see, the trip just slipped, and is holding steady for God knows how long. Should we I dunno...climb down the side of the tree the car isn't facing!?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: brennan4 on May 04, 2010, 12:16:48 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 03, 2010, 11:55:09 PM
The tree sequence was a joke. Let's see, the trip just slipped, and is holding steady for God knows how long. Should we I dunno...climb down the side of the tree the car isn't facing!?
Good point, I never really thought of that, but since this is one of my favorite movies of all time, I choose to ignore you now.

LALALALALALALALALALALALALALALALALALALALALALA
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 04, 2010, 12:20:04 AM
That just shows how great this film is. Despite the many mistakes, inconsistencies, and just general WTF moments, it doesn't detract from the overall quality.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on May 04, 2010, 12:34:50 AM
Most of them arent really jarring as you watch are they. Sure sometimes they pop into your head later or while talking about the film, but while youre watching they dont normally register. If you watched all films with that level of scrutiny youd never be able to watch action movies at all.

One thing that always bugs the shit out of me though and it has done since I first saw it is the ending of The Lost World. The T-Rex and the infant are in the hold, yet somehow everybody onboard the ship is torn to shreds. Theres even a severed hand holding onto the wheel in the bridge. Even if the T-Rex had gotten loose and then it went back into the hold and someone closed the doors before they died how the f**k did a massive T-Rex kill people inside the bridge without damaging the structure. Did it lift the roof off carefully, eat the poor sailors inside, put the roof back quietly, sneak back into the hold and sit waiting, pretending everythings fine? haha
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on May 04, 2010, 12:39:43 AM
The entire "giant monster on a rampage in the city" ending was awful. That shit belongs to Godzilla.

Enjoyed everything before that, though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on May 04, 2010, 12:43:16 AM
I loved the ending in the city. But the situation with the ship and everybody onboard being dead didnt make a jot of sense.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on May 04, 2010, 12:46:34 AM
QuoteThe tree sequence was a joke. Let's see, the trip just slipped, and is holding steady for God knows
how long. Should we I dunno...climb down the side of the tree the car isn't facing!?

Everyone's a f**king critic...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 04, 2010, 12:49:03 AM
Quote from: SM on May 04, 2010, 12:46:34 AM
QuoteThe tree sequence was a joke. Let's see, the trip just slipped, and is holding steady for God knows
how long. Should we I dunno...climb down the side of the tree the car isn't facing!?

Everyone's a f**king critic...

I'm just saying :P

Quote from: Keg on May 04, 2010, 12:34:50 AM
One thing that always bugs the shit out of me though and it has done since I first saw it is the ending of The Lost World. The T-Rex and the infant are in the hold, yet somehow everybody onboard the ship is torn to shreds. Theres even a severed hand holding onto the wheel in the bridge. Even if the T-Rex had gotten loose and then it went back into the hold and someone closed the doors before they died how the f**k did a massive T-Rex kill people inside the bridge without damaging the structure. Did it lift the roof off carefully, eat the poor sailors inside, put the roof back quietly, sneak back into the hold and sit waiting, pretending everythings fine? haha

Here's your explanation. (http://www.jplegacy.org/home.php?load=jurassicpark2/fftlwventureattack.shtml)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on May 04, 2010, 12:51:45 AM
Jurassic Park Legacy can come up with an explanation for anything.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on May 04, 2010, 12:56:21 AM
QuoteI'm just saying

No, you're whinging.  That scene in the tree was great.  Helped develop Tim and Grant, was exciting when trying to outrun the car, then the great punchline at the end.

Seeesh...

This however...
QuoteThe captain came out of the bridge and the Rex saw him at eye level and attacked him, ripping his body free from his hand which was gripping the wheel.

Sounds patently ridiculous.  Whinge about something legit, sir!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 04, 2010, 12:58:38 AM
Quote from: SM on May 04, 2010, 12:56:21 AM
QuoteI'm just saying

No, you're whinging.  That scene in the tree was great.  Helped develop Tim and Grant, was exciting when trying to outrun the car, then the great punchline at the end.

Seeesh...

Quote from: SM on May 04, 2010, 12:46:34 AM
Everyone's a f**king critic...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on May 04, 2010, 01:01:26 AM
Praise > whinge.

Aren't these your favourtist movies anyway?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 04, 2010, 01:02:40 AM
Doesn't mean I can't be annoyed by the lack of logic in one or two scenes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on May 04, 2010, 01:08:13 AM
The cinematic payoff is greater than any perceived lack of logic.  In that scene at least.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Pointman on May 04, 2010, 01:21:41 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 04, 2010, 12:49:03 AM
Quote from: SM on May 04, 2010, 12:46:34 AM
QuoteThe tree sequence was a joke. Let's see, the trip just slipped, and is holding steady for God knows
how long. Should we I dunno...climb down the side of the tree the car isn't facing!?

Everyone's a f**king critic...

I'm just saying :P

Quote from: Keg on May 04, 2010, 12:34:50 AM
One thing that always bugs the shit out of me though and it has done since I first saw it is the ending of The Lost World. The T-Rex and the infant are in the hold, yet somehow everybody onboard the ship is torn to shreds. Theres even a severed hand holding onto the wheel in the bridge. Even if the T-Rex had gotten loose and then it went back into the hold and someone closed the doors before they died how the f**k did a massive T-Rex kill people inside the bridge without damaging the structure. Did it lift the roof off carefully, eat the poor sailors inside, put the roof back quietly, sneak back into the hold and sit waiting, pretending everythings fine? haha

Here's your explanation. (http://www.jplegacy.org/home.php?load=jurassicpark2/fftlwventureattack.shtml)

I remember hearing a rumor that
Spoiler
raptors got onto the ship and attacked some of the crew.
[close]
Then again, could be wrong.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on May 04, 2010, 01:28:18 AM
So where were they when the Venture arrived?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 04, 2010, 01:32:38 AM
Cuba.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on May 04, 2010, 01:38:41 AM
Executing their plan to take out Castro?

Or just for the cigars?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 04, 2010, 01:47:21 AM
*looks left*

*looks right*

*leans in*

Both!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on May 04, 2010, 01:48:19 AM
 :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 04, 2010, 03:02:56 AM
Quote from: SM on May 04, 2010, 01:08:13 AM
The cinematic payoff is greater than any perceived lack of logic.  In that scene at least.

Oh hey, I can forgive the lack of logic. I just brought it up since we were discussing flubs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 04, 2010, 03:08:41 AM
Does JP Legacy provide a map of the park? I've always wanted to see the layout of the park. I am assuming the dock is *inside* the exhibit area, because Nedry opens the "Jurassic Park" gate and drives inside when he's trying to reach the dock.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: XenoVC on May 04, 2010, 03:14:51 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 03, 2010, 09:56:50 PM
Quote from: Skinner on May 03, 2010, 09:45:58 PM
Do you think Tim would actually do something like this after what he experienced?

It would explain the gentler dinosaurs.

The "gentler" dinosaurs which happen to be Carnotaurus and other happy time friends who convientiently escape into the Texas wilderness.

:P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on May 04, 2010, 03:27:32 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 04, 2010, 03:02:56 AM
Quote from: SM on May 04, 2010, 01:08:13 AM
The cinematic payoff is greater than any perceived lack of logic.  In that scene at least.

Oh hey, I can forgive the lack of logic. I just brought it up since we were discussing flubs.

You can argue the logic but it's not a mistake.  You can also question the logic of Tim surviving the crash in the first place.  And a squillion other things - but where's the fun in that?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Pointman on May 04, 2010, 07:20:32 AM
Why don't you guys all cheer up and watch the "Dodgson, We've Got Dodgson Here!" Remix.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wc7RIs7okUQ
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Lt. Mike Harrigan on May 04, 2010, 07:25:17 AM
Quote from: The Pointman on May 04, 2010, 07:20:32 AM
Why don't you guys all cheer up and watch the "Dodgson, We've Got Dodgson Here!" Remix.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wc7RIs7okUQ

:D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Pointman on May 04, 2010, 07:55:52 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBxgAmdPQWg

You have to excuse Dr. Malcolm...

I hope he is in the fourth. He made the second watchable.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on May 04, 2010, 11:34:45 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 04, 2010, 12:49:03 AM
Quote from: Keg on May 04, 2010, 12:34:50 AM
One thing that always bugs the shit out of me though and it has done since I first saw it is the ending of The Lost World. The T-Rex and the infant are in the hold, yet somehow everybody onboard the ship is torn to shreds. Theres even a severed hand holding onto the wheel in the bridge. Even if the T-Rex had gotten loose and then it went back into the hold and someone closed the doors before they died how the f**k did a massive T-Rex kill people inside the bridge without damaging the structure. Did it lift the roof off carefully, eat the poor sailors inside, put the roof back quietly, sneak back into the hold and sit waiting, pretending everythings fine? haha

Here's your explanation. (http://www.jplegacy.org/home.php?load=jurassicpark2/fftlwventureattack.shtml)

Pfft, chyeah...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on May 04, 2010, 11:40:24 AM
Quote from: The Pointman on May 04, 2010, 07:55:52 AM
You have to excuse Dr. Malcolm...

I hope he is in the fourth. He made the second watchable.

well Alan Grant was in III, and he made it just as watchable, if not more so, from a lower starting point :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on May 04, 2010, 06:51:43 PM
Quote from: TJ Doc on May 04, 2010, 11:34:45 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 04, 2010, 12:49:03 AM
Quote from: Keg on May 04, 2010, 12:34:50 AM
One thing that always bugs the shit out of me though and it has done since I first saw it is the ending of The Lost World. The T-Rex and the infant are in the hold, yet somehow everybody onboard the ship is torn to shreds. Theres even a severed hand holding onto the wheel in the bridge. Even if the T-Rex had gotten loose and then it went back into the hold and someone closed the doors before they died how the f**k did a massive T-Rex kill people inside the bridge without damaging the structure. Did it lift the roof off carefully, eat the poor sailors inside, put the roof back quietly, sneak back into the hold and sit waiting, pretending everythings fine? haha

Here's your explanation. (http://www.jplegacy.org/home.php?load=jurassicpark2/fftlwventureattack.shtml)

Pfft, chyeah...

exactly pfft. that just says the exact same thing i said. The t-rex bust free, ate the crew and somebody managed to press the button before they died when it went back into the hold and trapped it again. But it still doesnt explain the hand in the bridge. that article cannot explain the dead people in the bridge and it even says so at the end of it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Pointman on May 04, 2010, 06:55:40 PM
Quote from: Keg on May 04, 2010, 06:51:43 PM
Quote from: TJ Doc on May 04, 2010, 11:34:45 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 04, 2010, 12:49:03 AM
Quote from: Keg on May 04, 2010, 12:34:50 AM
One thing that always bugs the shit out of me though and it has done since I first saw it is the ending of The Lost World. The T-Rex and the infant are in the hold, yet somehow everybody onboard the ship is torn to shreds. Theres even a severed hand holding onto the wheel in the bridge. Even if the T-Rex had gotten loose and then it went back into the hold and someone closed the doors before they died how the f**k did a massive T-Rex kill people inside the bridge without damaging the structure. Did it lift the roof off carefully, eat the poor sailors inside, put the roof back quietly, sneak back into the hold and sit waiting, pretending everythings fine? haha

Here's your explanation. (http://www.jplegacy.org/home.php?load=jurassicpark2/fftlwventureattack.shtml)

Pfft, chyeah...

exactly pfft. that just says the exact same thing i said. The t-rex bust free, ate the crew and somebody managed to press the button before they died when it went back into the hold and trapped it again. But it still doesnt explain the hand in the bridge. that article cannot explain the dead people in the bridge and it even says so at the end of it.

It was probably other carnivores like the
Spoiler
Velociraptor.
[close]
I sh*t you not.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on May 04, 2010, 07:03:34 PM
Velociraptors on the boat were not seen in the film, neither was anything about it mentioned by any character, therefore it did not happen. Its a mistake, pure and simple. It's implied that the crew were all killed by the T-Rex as it must have broken free from the hold. The dead guys hand holding the button suggests this. the T-Rex must have went back into the hold at some point and a mortally wounded crew member pressed the button to shut it again. That im fine with. It makes sense. Everybody went up on deck to try and get the T-Rex back into the hold and they all got their asses handed to them.
The arm in the bridge is a simpel visual f**k up that cant be explained. They put it there because it looked good and it was shocking. They didnt think that at the time that it made no sense at all. Its a flub, plain and simple and cant be explained rationally other than guessing and making up shit that we dont know. The film itself implies the T-Rex did it and nothing else.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 04, 2010, 07:09:32 PM
I read somewhere that Spielberg originally wanted Raptors, hence the hand on the wheel. But at last minute changed to the T-Rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on May 04, 2010, 07:15:12 PM
Suppose you could say the infant did it but the scene later on suggests that bloke who goes into the hold is its first kill.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 04, 2010, 07:16:40 PM
Quote from: Keg on May 04, 2010, 07:15:12 PM
Suppose you could say the infant did it but the scene later on suggests that bloke who goes into the hold is its first kill.

The infant fitting through the door frame would make sense.

Edit: I think only the adult T-Rex was on-board the ship when it crashed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on May 04, 2010, 07:20:20 PM
The only trouble with that is, if the infant did it, how the f**k did a man manage to hold onto to the wheel or whatever it was while a bloody dinosaur was chewing on it. Only an instant, quick, clean bite could do that and i doubt the infant was capable of that. Still though that same thing would still apply to the raptors. That wouldnt have happened in real life but its a movie. The infant is probably the safest answer i suppose. Saw its mother having all the fun outside so it thought im having some of that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 04, 2010, 07:23:21 PM
I don't think the baby was on-board the boat when it crashed.

I pulled this off wikipedia...

Realizing that the Tyrannosaur will likely come for its infant, Malcolm and Sarah rush to the Jurassic Park arena to get the baby T. Rex, which had been brought in separately by plane, and during this time, the T. Rex is wreaking havoc in San Diego.

I am not sure if this is mentioned in the film, of the baby being brought separately. At this point I'll look at the hand scene as a goof.  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on May 04, 2010, 07:31:19 PM
Quote from: First Blood on May 04, 2010, 03:08:41 AM
Does JP Legacy provide a map of the park? I've always wanted to see the layout of the park. I am assuming the dock is *inside* the exhibit area, because Nedry opens the "Jurassic Park" gate and drives inside when he's trying to reach the dock.
Here's a pretty accurate map.
http://www.jplegacy.org/encyc/maps/islanublar.gif
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 04, 2010, 07:32:06 PM
Quote from: Skinner on May 04, 2010, 07:31:19 PM
Quote from: First Blood on May 04, 2010, 03:08:41 AM
Does JP Legacy provide a map of the park? I've always wanted to see the layout of the park. I am assuming the dock is *inside* the exhibit area, because Nedry opens the "Jurassic Park" gate and drives inside when he's trying to reach the dock.
Here's a pretty accurate map.
http://www.jplegacy.org/encyc/maps/islanublar.gif

:o Much appreciated Skinner!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on May 04, 2010, 07:37:45 PM
Quote from: First Blood on May 04, 2010, 07:23:21 PM
I don't think the baby was on-board the boat when it crashed.

I pulled this off wikipedia...

Realizing that the Tyrannosaur will likely come for its infant, Malcolm and Sarah rush to the Jurassic Park arena to get the baby T. Rex, which had been brought in separately by plane, and during this time, the T. Rex is wreaking havoc in San Diego.

I am not sure if this is mentioned in the film, of the baby being brought separately. At this point I'll look at the hand scene as a goof.  :-\

Yeaj youre right actually. They drive the car to the unfinished Jurassic Park in san diego where they grab the baby. So it had clearly allready arrived by the time the boat appeared. Bollocks thought i might have had a semi acceptable answer for a minute haha.

Quote from: Skinner on May 04, 2010, 07:31:19 PM
Quote from: First Blood on May 04, 2010, 03:08:41 AM
Does JP Legacy provide a map of the park? I've always wanted to see the layout of the park. I am assuming the dock is *inside* the exhibit area, because Nedry opens the "Jurassic Park" gate and drives inside when he's trying to reach the dock.
Here's a pretty accurate map.
http://www.jplegacy.org/encyc/maps/islanublar.gif

Nice
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 05, 2010, 01:50:36 AM
Quote from: First Blood on May 04, 2010, 07:09:32 PM
I read somewhere that Spielberg originally wanted Raptors, hence the hand on the wheel. But at last minute changed to the T-Rex.

Glad he decided otherwise. Raptors were boring by that point.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 05, 2010, 01:51:38 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 05, 2010, 01:50:36 AM
Quote from: First Blood on May 04, 2010, 07:09:32 PM
I read somewhere that Spielberg originally wanted Raptors, hence the hand on the wheel. But at last minute changed to the T-Rex.

Glad he decided otherwise. Raptors were boring by that point.

The threat of multiple Raptors would have been much harder to contain also.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on May 05, 2010, 02:12:31 AM
I think raptors would have been much better. Several raptors running through the city, pouncing on civilians. Although you would be tired of seeing them at that point in the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on May 05, 2010, 02:15:36 AM
Just get a bunch of girls from the high school gym team to take them out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 05, 2010, 02:17:44 AM
Quote from: Skinner on May 05, 2010, 02:12:31 AM
I think raptors would have been much better. Several raptors running through the city, pouncing on civilians. Although you would be tired of seeing them at that point in the movie.

Actually they didn't have much screen time. They killed everyone in the long-grass and attack Malcolm and Co at the abandoned station. That was it. The Lost World was mostly the Rex's show.

Jurassic Park's running theme was the Raptors
The Lost World's was the T-Rex's
and Jurassic Park 3 focused on the Raptors again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 05, 2010, 02:21:24 AM
I'm so sick of the raptors. Why the hell was the Dilophosaurus taken away from the series after JP? I would've liked to see more of it...maybe a small group even.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 05, 2010, 02:21:58 AM
They kick-ass!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on May 05, 2010, 02:24:30 AM
i want some new dinosaurs.

dilos are fine, but i want something else
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 05, 2010, 02:25:27 AM
I enjoyed the Compys that ate Dieter.  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 05, 2010, 02:25:57 AM
JP 3's best scene for me, was easily the Pteranodon sequence. It finally gave us something new which was intense, had great build up, and was fun.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ButtZilla on May 05, 2010, 06:31:52 AM
I know the CG will be brilliant but please, what everyone want to see is a good story and characters that we give a darn.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on May 05, 2010, 06:37:27 AM
"Darn"?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ButtZilla on May 05, 2010, 07:56:28 AM
DAMN!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on May 05, 2010, 08:07:51 AM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on May 05, 2010, 02:24:30 AM
i want some new dinosaurs.

dilos are fine, but i want something else

what hasn't been done? sea dinos? becauser i don't see how it can be written that ingen was stupid enough to engineer prehistoric leviathans and stick 'em in the sea.

although that would be ultra-sweet. could be a cross between dinoshark and the abyss.

also i agree with doom that the pteradon stuff was awesome in III,
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on May 05, 2010, 10:51:30 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 05, 2010, 02:25:57 AM
JP 3's best scene for me, was easily the Pteranodon sequence. It finally gave us something new which was intense, had great build up, and was fun.

Not to mention completely unrealistic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 05, 2010, 01:59:07 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on May 05, 2010, 08:07:51 AM
sea dinos?
Sea Dinos didn't exist.

Quote from: Puks on May 05, 2010, 10:51:30 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 05, 2010, 02:25:57 AM
JP 3's best scene for me, was easily the Pteranodon sequence. It finally gave us something new which was intense, had great build up, and was fun.

Not to mention completely unrealistic.
Who cares! Those Pteranodons were genetic freaks after all...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on May 05, 2010, 02:05:52 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 05, 2010, 01:59:07 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on May 05, 2010, 08:07:51 AM
sea dinos?
Sea Dinos didn't exist.

Plesiosaurs then, picky!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 05, 2010, 02:08:03 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on May 05, 2010, 02:05:52 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 05, 2010, 01:59:07 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on May 05, 2010, 08:07:51 AM
sea dinos?
Sea Dinos didn't exist.

Plesiosaurs then, picky!
;D ;)

Seeing something like the WWD Liopleurodon wouldn't hurt, really:
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.abc.net.au%2Fdinosaurs%2Fchronology%2F149%2Fimages%2Fliopleurodon.jpg&hash=364f4879e09a6afdd9eed032b9a573cc37127322)
Majestic, that's all I need to say.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: brennan4 on May 05, 2010, 02:18:35 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 05, 2010, 02:08:03 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on May 05, 2010, 02:05:52 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 05, 2010, 01:59:07 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on May 05, 2010, 08:07:51 AM
sea dinos?
Sea Dinos didn't exist.

Plesiosaurs then, picky!
;D ;)

Seeing something like the WWD Liopleurodon wouldn't hurt, really:
http://www.abc.net.au/dinosaurs/chronology/149/images/liopleurodon.jpg
Majestic, that's all I need to say.
How would they escape a liopleurodon? Personally, I would like to see mosasaurs
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on May 05, 2010, 02:29:04 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 05, 2010, 02:08:03 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on May 05, 2010, 02:05:52 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 05, 2010, 01:59:07 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on May 05, 2010, 08:07:51 AM
sea dinos?
Sea Dinos didn't exist.

Plesiosaurs then, picky!
;D ;)

Seeing something like the WWD Liopleurodon wouldn't hurt, really:
http://www.abc.net.au/dinosaurs/chronology/149/images/liopleurodon.jpg
Majestic, that's all I need to say.

yeah, that's cool. but like i said, how are they going to come up with a way to explain how ingen were stupid enough to engineer and release gaint sea carnivores!!

perhaps for something different ingen should build "Cenozoic Park" shame it doesn't have quite the same ring to it :(

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2Fc%2Fca%2FCenozoic_cosmo_1894_beard_1913.gif&hash=425e3369aba62b64b4b3b3da847e5c3a5732c818)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 05, 2010, 06:44:34 PM
Quote from: brennan4 on May 05, 2010, 02:18:35 PM
How would they escape a liopleurodon? Personally, I would like to see mosasaurs
Rule of Cool.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on May 05, 2010, 06:47:54 PM
Quoteliopleurodon, mosasaur

Since they were fully aquatic, there's no way a mosquito could suck their blood. I'm sorry, no marine reptiles in JP.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on May 05, 2010, 06:51:17 PM
Quote from: Puks on May 05, 2010, 06:47:54 PM
Quoteliopleurodon, mosasaur

Since they were fully aquatic, there's no way a mosquito could suck their blood. I'm sorry, no marine reptiles in JP.

Thats a good point. Seeing as how stfar fetched the mosquito idea was in the first place though I dont think it would be hard to come up with an explanation as to how they cloned plesiosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 05, 2010, 06:52:43 PM
Quote from: Puks on May 05, 2010, 06:47:54 PM
Quoteliopleurodon, mosasaur

Since they were fully aquatic, there's no way a mosquito could suck their blood. I'm sorry, no marine reptiles in JP.
...They could use the method of the book. DNA drain was supported with extracting from bones.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on May 05, 2010, 07:01:10 PM
Should I even bother writing that there's no DNA in fossils? Hmmm..

..oh I already did.  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 05, 2010, 07:10:59 PM
"Bingo, dino DNA!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on May 05, 2010, 07:13:19 PM
Just as daft as coming across a lump of amber, which happens to have a mosquito perfectly preserved inside, which happens to contain dino dna, which happens to be useable for cloning. Its Sci-Fi monster fun leaning more towards the Fi so they can do whatever the hell they want to put ruddy great big dinos onscreen.

I'd love an underwater scene with a plesiosaur or something. Awesome. Get in there. How i dont know. just get it done  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 05, 2010, 07:15:41 PM
Speaking of underwater scenes, in Jurassic Park 3 one of my favorite scenes was when the Spino was attacking the boat on the river. It was something new and exciting. Other than that, the film was a disappointment.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: brennan4 on May 05, 2010, 08:09:55 PM
Quote from: Puks on May 05, 2010, 07:01:10 PM
Should I even bother writing that there's no DNA in fossils? Hmmm..

..oh I already did.  ;D
The dna's from blood in mosquitoes preserved in amber. I'll be over here prertending that makes more sense.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MrBrokenTusks. on May 05, 2010, 08:21:51 PM
Quote from: First Blood on May 05, 2010, 07:15:41 PM
Speaking of underwater scenes, in Jurassic Park 3 one of my favorite scenes was when the Spino was attacking the boat on the river. It was something new and exciting. Other than that, the film was a disappointment.
Agreed  I think in the new one they should try something new.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 05, 2010, 08:24:28 PM
Quote from: Puks on May 05, 2010, 07:01:10 PM
Should I even bother writing that there's no DNA in fossils? Hmmm..

..oh I already did.  ;D

If you can believe it, dinosaur bones have been discovered with soft tissue still intact.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on May 05, 2010, 08:44:53 PM
Damn, I just read National Geographic's articles on this and I don't know what to say.. a mammoth is ok, but a T-Rex? How the f**k did that happen? If I was a dino geek version of Jules Winnfield I'd say it's a f**kin miracle. This shit just doesn't happen.

Okey, I'm going back to Google to find me some moar.

And thanks for proving me wrong, Doom.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on May 05, 2010, 08:58:16 PM
Quote from: Puks on May 05, 2010, 08:44:53 PM
Damn, I just read National Geographic's articles on this and I don't know what to say.. a mammoth is ok, but a T-Rex? How the f**k did that happen? If I was a dino geek version of Jules Winnfield I'd say it's a f**kin miracle. This shit just doesn't happen.

Okey, I'm going back to Google to find me some moar.

And thanks for proving me wrong, Doom.

Mind hooking me up with a link if you find any information? I checked the Nat Geo website and didn't find it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Yautja117 on May 05, 2010, 08:59:37 PM
Yeah. I always that that was abit strange... ???
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Captain on May 05, 2010, 09:18:06 PM
If they don't get a decent story line sorted then it'll be just a monster movie an din danger of becoming too B-movie-ish
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on May 05, 2010, 09:40:38 PM
Quote from: Remonster on May 05, 2010, 08:58:16 PM
Quote from: Puks on May 05, 2010, 08:44:53 PM
Damn, I just read National Geographic's articles on this and I don't know what to say.. a mammoth is ok, but a T-Rex? How the f**k did that happen? If I was a dino geek version of Jules Winnfield I'd say it's a f**kin miracle. This shit just doesn't happen.

Okey, I'm going back to Google to find me some moar.

And thanks for proving me wrong, Doom.

Mind hooking me up with a link if you find any information? I checked the Nat Geo website and didn't find it.

Here's what I read:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/04/070412-dino-tissues.html

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 05, 2010, 09:59:42 PM
Quote from: Puks on May 05, 2010, 08:44:53 PM
Damn, I just read National Geographic's articles on this and I don't know what to say.. a mammoth is ok, but a T-Rex? How the f**k did that happen? If I was a dino geek version of Jules Winnfield I'd say it's a f**kin miracle. This shit just doesn't happen.

Okey, I'm going back to Google to find me some moar.

And thanks for proving me wrong, Doom.

I know, isn't it something? But did they find any actual red blood cells?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on May 05, 2010, 10:08:29 PM
There seems to be nothing new on this, every article points to the 2005 discovery, subsequent restoring of a few amino-acids and comparing it to chicken's...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 05, 2010, 10:47:34 PM
Interesting. The last time something like this happened, a T.Rex leg was discovered with blood vessels still intact. Sounds familiar at all?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on May 05, 2010, 11:49:19 PM
QuoteI'd love an underwater scene with a plesiosaur or something. Awesome. Get in there. How i dont know. just get it done

My old JP fan script had a brief sequence where a dude is trying to hide from a tyrannosaurus by standing very still at the edge of a lake and a liopleurodon surfaces and eats him.  The rex then wades in after it for a punch on.  Then the rexs mate appeared and joins in.  Carnage ensues
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Yautja117 on May 06, 2010, 12:55:00 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 05, 2010, 10:47:34 PM
Interesting. The last time something like this happened, a T.Rex leg was discovered with blood vessels still intact. Sounds familiar at all?
It was on Boneheads (an old Dino show on Discovery Kids about 10 years ago) It was interesting. How can something like that survive all this time? It doesn't seem possible for organic matter to last that long.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on May 07, 2010, 12:16:12 PM
The first two covers of the new JP comic have been released.
I can't wait for this!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi41.tinypic.com%2F5cm2ye.png&hash=a62621eb56774a04105ce8ad07ba669ae3da60a1)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 07, 2010, 12:23:13 PM
Nuclear facility in Jurassic park Comics?
With Dinosaurs that just wait to be exposed to radiations?
...
O SHIT

Jokes apart, I like 'em both. Left one especially.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 07, 2010, 02:51:05 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 07, 2010, 12:16:12 PM
The first two covers of the new JP comic have been released.
I can't wait for this!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi41.tinypic.com%2F5cm2ye.png&hash=a62621eb56774a04105ce8ad07ba669ae3da60a1)

Geez, those Trikes are friggin gargantuan.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hive Tyrant on May 07, 2010, 05:58:07 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 07, 2010, 02:51:05 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 07, 2010, 12:16:12 PM
The first two covers of the new JP comic have been released.
I can't wait for this!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi41.tinypic.com%2F5cm2ye.png&hash=a62621eb56774a04105ce8ad07ba669ae3da60a1)

Geez, those Trikes are friggin gargantuan.

They really were that big. Or something close to it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 07, 2010, 07:05:38 PM
They look oversized, still.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 07, 2010, 07:06:51 PM
Triceratops was 3-4 meters tall.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on May 08, 2010, 03:14:46 PM
They are oversized.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MrBrokenTusks. on May 08, 2010, 03:16:31 PM
It could just be the angle they drew from since it is from the ground pointing up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on May 08, 2010, 04:44:00 PM
Well at least their not Godzilla size which is good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on May 08, 2010, 05:58:14 PM
I don't think they look too oversized.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mcgill.ca%2Ffiles%2Fredpath%2FTriceratops.2.jpg&hash=d4f24ab1a9c59b0be04dd9519543e80f2af3f9c8)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Captain Salt on May 08, 2010, 06:28:50 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 07, 2010, 12:16:12 PM
The first two covers of the new JP comic have been released.
I can't wait for this!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi41.tinypic.com%2F5cm2ye.png&hash=a62621eb56774a04105ce8ad07ba669ae3da60a1)

Um. I posted these like 15 pages back. And these are both covers for issue 2...you missed the issue 1 covers entirely, which were posted in March!  8)

Anyhoo, just found a cool pic of a few of the original comic covers:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi39.tinypic.com%2F4rf8yd.jpg&hash=c9de6aaa686523192ad309198c0903ccfdc95215)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Lt. Mike Harrigan on May 08, 2010, 06:45:03 PM
As much as I love the series, I'm not really bothered about a new Jurassic Park film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: brennan4 on May 08, 2010, 06:52:58 PM
Quote from: Captain Salt on May 08, 2010, 06:28:50 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 07, 2010, 12:16:12 PM
The first two covers of the new JP comic have been released.
I can't wait for this!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi41.tinypic.com%2F5cm2ye.png&hash=a62621eb56774a04105ce8ad07ba669ae3da60a1)

Um. I posted these like 15 pages back. And these are both covers for issue 2...you missed the issue 1 covers entirely, which were posted in March!  8)

Anyhoo, just found a cool pic of a few of the original comic covers:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi39.tinypic.com%2F4rf8yd.jpg&hash=c9de6aaa686523192ad309198c0903ccfdc95215)
I loooooooove the old covers ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 08, 2010, 07:13:57 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on May 08, 2010, 04:44:00 PM
Well at least their not Godzilla size which is good.
*Imagines Triceratops charging Godzilla*....
...
8) 8) 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 08, 2010, 07:16:56 PM
Next Godzilla flick, right there!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on May 08, 2010, 08:01:51 PM
Quote from: Lt. Mike Harrigan on May 08, 2010, 06:45:03 PM
As much as I love the series, I'm not really bothered about a new Jurassic Park film.

Yeah, I'm hoping it doesn't get off the ground. Especially if Joe Johnston is planning to direct again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on May 08, 2010, 08:19:03 PM
I had a few of the older JP comics. Are the new comics out yet?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hive Tyrant on May 08, 2010, 08:37:33 PM
Quote from: Walk Evil Talk on May 08, 2010, 08:01:51 PM
Quote from: Lt. Mike Harrigan on May 08, 2010, 06:45:03 PM
As much as I love the series, I'm not really bothered about a new Jurassic Park film.

Yeah, I'm hoping it doesn't get off the ground. Especially if Joe Johnston is planning to direct again.

Eh, I won't mind. JP/// was no masterpiece but I always thought it was an enjoyable addition to the franchise. Except for the whole Spinosaurus bit.  ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 08, 2010, 09:39:37 PM
What, you disliked the animal's inclusion or the fact that it offed the Rex? Coz usually the latter is the case.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on May 08, 2010, 10:30:41 PM
Quote from: Hive Tyrant on May 08, 2010, 08:37:33 PM
Quote from: Walk Evil Talk on May 08, 2010, 08:01:51 PM
Quote from: Lt. Mike Harrigan on May 08, 2010, 06:45:03 PM
As much as I love the series, I'm not really bothered about a new Jurassic Park film.

Yeah, I'm hoping it doesn't get off the ground. Especially if Joe Johnston is planning to direct again.

Eh, I won't mind. JP/// was no masterpiece but I always thought it was an enjoyable addition to the franchise. Except for the whole Spinosaurus bit.  ::)

I don't know, I just didn't feel like it fit with the first two. It had some nice visuals, but the overall tone and the acting (especially from Tea Leoni and William H. Macy) just didn't work for me. I also disliked that they had to work a child into the story even after it'd been done in both previous movies. Also, the movie had almost no build-up to the major action, which I think even haters of TLW can admit that movie had more of.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hive Tyrant on May 08, 2010, 11:20:11 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 08, 2010, 09:39:37 PM
What, you disliked the animal's inclusion or the fact that it offed the Rex? Coz usually the latter is the case.

More or less how it was portrayed. It pursued the humans all across the island for no good reason -- at least the raptors had an excuse.  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 08, 2010, 11:26:39 PM
Quote from: Hive Tyrant on May 08, 2010, 11:20:11 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 08, 2010, 09:39:37 PM
What, you disliked the animal's inclusion or the fact that it offed the Rex? Coz usually the latter is the case.

More or less how it was portrayed. It pursued the humans all across the island for no good reason -- at least the raptors had an excuse.  :-\

Yea, I can see your point. The Rex showed up in JP(1) when it was necessary. When the fences broke, when Muldoon and Ellie rescues Malcolm, it's still roaming around its habitat. As the film progresses it gets deeper into the park and other exhibits.

Spino:  "I'll just chase these people for the hell of it!"  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on May 08, 2010, 11:41:55 PM
Didn't get to eat man meat very often, so I guess it was just making the most of the situation.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 08, 2010, 11:51:03 PM
I just have trouble figuring out how it actually got on the island. Grant makes references that he didn't know the Spino was on InGen's list for dinosaurs to breed. Are we left to assume, while the events of the Lost World are taking place the Spino is a baby if that?

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on May 08, 2010, 11:56:04 PM
I guess that's possible. Or they just got lucky in LW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hive Tyrant on May 09, 2010, 12:01:20 AM
Probably were lucky never to encounter it. As I recall, large parts of JP/// take place in wildly different locations from TLW -- I'm guessing the Spino's territory was in the bits we see in JP///, and it didn't leave during the events of TLW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on May 09, 2010, 12:15:44 AM
Spino's territory was the north side of the island while most of TLW happened on the south side.
(Isla Sorna Map)
http://www.jplegacy.org/encyc/maps/sorna.gif
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 09, 2010, 01:50:00 AM
Quote from: First Blood on May 08, 2010, 11:51:03 PM
I just have trouble figuring out how it actually got on the island. Grant makes references that he didn't know the Spino was on InGen's list for dinosaurs to breed. Are we left to assume, while the events of the Lost World are taking place the Spino is a baby if that?

Remember too that in JP, there were dinosaur embryos in the canisters that Nedry opened which, as far as we know, had not been bred. So a Spinosaurus on the island isn't too far-fetched.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dark Passenger on May 09, 2010, 07:39:36 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 09, 2010, 01:50:00 AM
Quote from: First Blood on May 08, 2010, 11:51:03 PM
I just have trouble figuring out how it actually got on the island. Grant makes references that he didn't know the Spino was on InGen's list for dinosaurs to breed. Are we left to assume, while the events of the Lost World are taking place the Spino is a baby if that?

Remember too that in JP, there were dinosaur embryos in the canisters that Nedry opened which, as far as we know, had not been bred. So a Spinosaurus on the island isn't too far-fetched.

and they dont show every single dinosaur species that was on the island.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on May 09, 2010, 07:11:43 PM
I really do hate the idea of hundreds of species thriving in Jurassic Park. I mean come on how much Dino D.N.A could one possibly find?! Just leave it as it is, there are enough dinos as it is.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 09, 2010, 07:14:19 PM
I'd like to see a Metriacanthosaurus (one of the embryo classes in the first film) and Carnotaurus (second book). They would be so awesome!
And moar ceratosaurus plz.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on May 09, 2010, 07:42:09 PM
Ok I defiantly agree the Carnotaurus' from the book would be amazing in a film!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 09, 2010, 07:44:41 PM
Maybe one like Disney's Dinosaurs!
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dinosaurfact.net%2FPictures%2FCarnotaurus.jpg&hash=045e19e6dba8b576b0e3be25871d1ae6ce7a20d7)
Too much win to handle.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: XenoVC on May 09, 2010, 07:57:55 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 09, 2010, 07:14:19 PM
I'd like to see a Metriacanthosaurus (one of the embryo classes in the first film) and Carnotaurus (second book). They would be so awesome!
And moar ceratosaurus plz.
Maybe Baryonyx,Metriacanthosaurus etc weren't even on the island yet?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on May 09, 2010, 08:00:53 PM
Carnotaurus looks anything but menacing with its silly short snout and tiny crippled arms.

If you want a big bad dino that's not only terrifying, but also new, guys like Carcharodontosaurus, Allosaurus, Giganotosaurus, Acrocanthosaurus, etc. should be your choice.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on May 09, 2010, 08:12:12 PM
Quote from: Puks on May 09, 2010, 08:00:53 PM
Carnotaurus looks anything but menacing with its silly short snout and tiny crippled arms.

If you want a big bad dino that's not only terrifying, but also new, guys like Carcharodontosaurus, Allosaurus, Giganotosaurus, Acrocanthosaurus, etc. should be your choice.

Seeing a Jurassic Park film with an Allosaurus would be a dream come true for me. It'd be a great addition to the series, and while its not quite as big as the Tyrannosaur or Spinosaur, It would be just as terrifying. I would also like to see the Dilophosaurs get some more attention.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on May 09, 2010, 08:18:09 PM
I dare say an Allosaurus would pose a greater threat to a human than T-Rex and Spino combined.

Agility > Size.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on May 09, 2010, 08:27:54 PM
Quote from: Puks on May 09, 2010, 08:18:09 PM
I dare say an Allosaurus would pose a greater threat to a human than T-Rex and Spino combined.

Agility > Size.

I completely agree. As much as i love the Tyrannosaur in the first movie, I think Allosuarus would make an a more than suitable replacement for the main dinosaur in the next movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Captain on May 09, 2010, 08:49:15 PM
Quote from: Remonster on May 09, 2010, 08:27:54 PM
Quote from: Puks on May 09, 2010, 08:18:09 PM
I dare say an Allosaurus would pose a greater threat to a human than T-Rex and Spino combined.

Agility > Size.

I completely agree. As much as i love the Tyrannosaur in the first movie, I think Allosuarus would make an a more than suitable replacement for the main dinosaur in the next movie.

I agree, however, would the public accept the new 'boss' dinosaur being smaller than the T-Rex or Spinosaurus? Size is everyting. Apparently.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on May 09, 2010, 08:55:46 PM
That's got more to do with American megalomania than common sense. No offense, my dear Yankees.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on May 09, 2010, 09:10:35 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2Fthumb%2Fc%2Fc5%2FLargesttheropods.svg%2F800px-Largesttheropods.svg.png&hash=266de0af8c64e583acc0e7cfc83cc9dba4b65d40)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on May 09, 2010, 10:03:30 PM
Quote from: The Captain on May 09, 2010, 08:49:15 PM
Quote from: Remonster on May 09, 2010, 08:27:54 PM
Quote from: Puks on May 09, 2010, 08:18:09 PM
I dare say an Allosaurus would pose a greater threat to a human than T-Rex and Spino combined.

Agility > Size.

I completely agree. As much as i love the Tyrannosaur in the first movie, I think Allosuarus would make an a more than suitable replacement for the main dinosaur in the next movie.

I agree, however, would the public accept the new 'boss' dinosaur being smaller than the T-Rex or Spinosaurus? Size is everyting. Apparently.

I don't know. I think its all about how the Allosaurus would be portrayed. Audiences are relatively familiar with smaller carnivorous dinosaurs being featured in the movies, like the Velociraptor and Dilophosaurus. Allosaurus is unique in that it is still quite large, but is much faster than Tyrannosaurus or Spinosaurus. Personally, I would make the Allosaurus a very dangerous and tenacious creature in the movie, to show how it is a worthy "boss" dinosaur.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on May 10, 2010, 12:20:06 AM
a couple of them chasing the protagonists in a car like in JP and TLW, but, you know, much more longer and dynamic.

i want a damn car chase!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on May 10, 2010, 12:29:06 AM
There's one in the first film.

Quote from: AvatarIII on May 09, 2010, 09:10:35 PM
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c5/Largesttheropods.svg/800px-Largesttheropods.svg.png

o hai!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on May 10, 2010, 12:50:05 AM
Allosaurus was nearly as long as T-Rex, largest individuals were just one meter below the T-Rex's length of 13 meters, so they'd look almost the same size on screen.

It gets much more fun when we take their mass into account. With its 6000-7000 kg of weight, T-Rex was not exactly the fastest and most nimble super-predator around.

In the other corner of the ring, we have Allosaurus with only 1500-2000 kg. Superficially, both dinos are almost the same size, yet the latter is three times lighter than the former.

And while I'm pretty sure (and most of you gentlemen will certainly agree) a T-Rex would would own the shit outta his earlier distant relative, the question really is - what's more dangerous to a human being?

I think the answer is obvious.

Put Allosaurus in the next film and you've already got solid foundations for some kick-ass action.

Who's with Puks? I wanna hear it!  :D

Edit:
QuoteThere's one in the first film.

Didn't like it. Too over-the-top. A T-Rex would NOT keep up with a jeep. Period.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on May 10, 2010, 12:55:16 AM
That explain why it didn't I guess.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 10, 2010, 12:59:48 AM
"We've pumped the T-Rex at 35mph."

When they first started the jeep, it would was able to keep up with them because the jeep had to gain speed but the Rex quickly falls behind and loses interest.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 10, 2010, 01:00:45 AM
"Must go faster."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on May 10, 2010, 01:03:43 AM
QuoteWhen they first started the jeep, it would was able to keep up with them because the jeep had to gain speed but the Rex quickly falls behind and loses interest.

And Goldblum was f**king with the jeeps gear stick.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 10, 2010, 01:03:52 AM
 :D

"Get off the stick! Bloody move!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on May 10, 2010, 01:05:55 AM
"You think they'll have that on the tour?"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 10, 2010, 01:08:21 AM
"Remind me to thank John for a lovely weekend."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on May 10, 2010, 01:10:11 AM
"Should we chance moving him?"
"Please chance it."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 10, 2010, 01:11:04 AM
"Anybody hear that? That's ah...that's an impact tremor..."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on May 10, 2010, 01:12:56 AM
Quotes again... :D

''When that Tricycloplots attacks you, don't come crying to me''
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on May 10, 2010, 01:14:21 AM
Never mind that...  Watch the (crappy quality) scene and be done with it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VG99lZ5jU0
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on May 10, 2010, 01:15:22 AM
Quote from: SM on May 10, 2010, 12:55:16 AM
That explain why it didn't I guess.

You always have something to prove me wrong, don't you? Okey, I'll put it this way - the T-Rex pursued the car for longer than he could IRL. There.

Quote"We've pumped the T-Rex at 35mph."

I demand physical evidence!
Now, seriously, 56 km/h is a bit far-fetched, I could see 30, maybe even 40 km/h. But it's my opinion (and the scientific majority's opinion) anyway, some experts estimate a lower top speed and a few believe T-Rex was capable of pushing more than 60 km/h.

Either way, we'll never know for sure, so it's open to discussion.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 10, 2010, 01:21:18 AM
Suspension of disbelief.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on May 10, 2010, 01:25:56 AM
QuoteYou always have something to prove me wrong, don't you? Okey, I'll put it this way - the T-Rex pursued the car for longer than he could IRL. There.

QuoteAnd Goldblum was f**king with the jeeps gear stick.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 10, 2010, 01:26:59 AM
"Now that's- that's chaos theory."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on May 10, 2010, 01:45:42 AM
Quote from: SM on May 10, 2010, 01:25:56 AM
QuoteYou always have something to prove me wrong, don't you? Okey, I'll put it this way - the T-Rex pursued the car for longer than he could IRL. There.

QuoteAnd Goldblum was f**king with the jeeps gear stick.

Damn you, I will have to watch the whole scene now.

*starts digging up JP dvd*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Captain Salt on May 10, 2010, 01:50:33 AM
Just found some cool concept posters for JP3...there are a bunch of these on the DVD.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg406.imageshack.us%2Fimg406%2F4609%2Fjp3poster1.jpg&hash=763b18488ba06b674626ec53df56c4fdf00b15a6)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg188.imageshack.us%2Fimg188%2F830%2Fjp3poster2.jpg&hash=9548a8ba88675fe9a0b35e6a9e93650aebc20131)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg10.imageshack.us%2Fimg10%2F2699%2Fjp3poster3.jpg&hash=b682b01cb8a238d914d3e578f6710482f7939d3b)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg32.imageshack.us%2Fimg32%2F5290%2Fjp3poster4.jpg&hash=56b1d94844eacf1c013e6d86209d9ae2fb5140a4)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg202.imageshack.us%2Fimg202%2F1488%2Fjp3poster5.jpg&hash=de59208c3869f87131f41c1d76c1910446848a6c)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 10, 2010, 04:41:18 AM
Quote from: First Blood on May 10, 2010, 12:59:48 AM
"We've pumped the T-Rex at 35mph."

When they first started the jeep, it would was able to keep up with them because the jeep had to gain speed but the Rex quickly falls behind and loses interest.

Pumped? Could've sworn the line was "clocked".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on May 10, 2010, 05:06:03 AM
Yeah me too.

Who did they time giving the t-rex a root at 35mph anyway?  :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SiL on May 10, 2010, 06:53:20 AM
My proudest moment ... *sniff*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 10, 2010, 05:02:31 PM
You're one brave f**k SiL. *a toast!*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 10, 2010, 05:37:03 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 10, 2010, 04:41:18 AM
Quote from: First Blood on May 10, 2010, 12:59:48 AM
"We've pumped the T-Rex at 35mph."

When they first started the jeep, it would was able to keep up with them because the jeep had to gain speed but the Rex quickly falls behind and loses interest.

Pumped? Could've sworn the line was "clocked".

I stand corrected.   :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hive Tyrant on May 10, 2010, 05:41:07 PM
Quote from: Puks on May 09, 2010, 08:00:53 PM
Carnotaurus looks anything but menacing with its silly short snout and tiny crippled arms.

You wouldn't even get to see it properly so that doesn't matter. Did any of you read the second book? Camouflage? Hellooo?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on May 10, 2010, 07:05:12 PM
Oh that.. ehm.. more suitable for films like Carnosaur imho.

(Yeah, yeah, I know, Dilophosaurus had special powahs, too, blah blah.. )

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 10, 2010, 08:46:07 PM
Quote from: Hive Tyrant on May 10, 2010, 05:41:07 PM
Quote from: Puks on May 09, 2010, 08:00:53 PM
Carnotaurus looks anything but menacing with its silly short snout and tiny crippled arms.

You wouldn't even get to see it properly so that doesn't matter. Did any of you read the second book? Camouflage? Hellooo?

No one is going to buy that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 10, 2010, 09:46:32 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 10, 2010, 05:02:31 PM
You're one brave f**k SiL. *a toast!*

Here's how!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on May 10, 2010, 11:00:03 PM
Quote from: Captain Salt on May 10, 2010, 01:50:33 AM
Just found some cool concept posters for JP3...there are a bunch of these on the DVD.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg406.imageshack.us%2Fimg406%2F4609%2Fjp3poster1.jpg&hash=763b18488ba06b674626ec53df56c4fdf00b15a6)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg188.imageshack.us%2Fimg188%2F830%2Fjp3poster2.jpg&hash=9548a8ba88675fe9a0b35e6a9e93650aebc20131)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg10.imageshack.us%2Fimg10%2F2699%2Fjp3poster3.jpg&hash=b682b01cb8a238d914d3e578f6710482f7939d3b)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg32.imageshack.us%2Fimg32%2F5290%2Fjp3poster4.jpg&hash=56b1d94844eacf1c013e6d86209d9ae2fb5140a4)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg202.imageshack.us%2Fimg202%2F1488%2Fjp3poster5.jpg&hash=de59208c3869f87131f41c1d76c1910446848a6c)
I love the first one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Noir-Gojira on May 11, 2010, 03:33:10 AM
Quote from: Captain Salt on May 10, 2010, 01:50:33 AM
Just found some cool concept posters for JP3...there are a bunch of these on the DVD.
Too bad they're pretty much the only cool things about that movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Captain on May 11, 2010, 08:46:25 PM
I remember going to see JP3 with my first fiance *sigh* memories.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 12, 2010, 04:05:59 PM
Of her or the movie? Or what you did during the movie?

;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Captain on May 12, 2010, 08:47:08 PM
I must admit it was the girl I was reminiscing about. I was still very young at the time. She was what Americans would call a good time girl.
JP3 was my least favourite JP film, however, it had some good scenes in it. It just concerns me that the JP films seem to get worst with each sequel. Hopefully the new JP will bring something fresh to the series. From reading the original novels I always imagined the JP movies to be a little more darker or adult/violent than they were. Can't imagine the studio going for that though, PG-13 most likely. I am genuinely concerned the series will descend into B-movie territory kind of like AVPR did.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 12, 2010, 10:30:22 PM
Good god man, don't even say that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Captain Salt on May 13, 2010, 01:50:51 AM
Well, I don't know if JP3 was as bad as AVP-R, but it was pretty bad. Hopefully the Bros. Strause will never come near any anything else with fans, (or fan).

Yet for some strange reason, I'm pulling for Captain America to work out, despite the fact that Joe Johnston was always a better concept designer than he was a director.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on May 13, 2010, 08:28:27 AM
Quote from: Captain Salt on May 13, 2010, 01:50:51 AM
Well, I don't know if JP3 was as bad as AVP-R, but it was pretty bad. Hopefully the Bros. Strause will never come near any anything else with fans, (or fan).

Yet for some strange reason, I'm pulling for Captain America to work out, despite the fact that Joe Johnston was always a better concept designer than he was a director.

JP3 wasn't even as bad as AVP imho, let alone AVPR, i think he'll do a fine job on the Cap, i enjoyed Wolfman.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Noir-Gojira on May 13, 2010, 08:29:24 PM
Lucky you.  I wanted to enjoy the Wolfman, and I really did try ;_;
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on May 13, 2010, 08:31:11 PM
http://www.jplegacy.org/home2.php
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi33.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fd89%2FBrachioInGen%2Fjurassicparkemergencelo.png&hash=b87e3815722cf3633fbde61eaff6a95226477f43)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mc7o6tmyQwk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzAwJZQrfoQ
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 13, 2010, 08:49:15 PM
I like what I'm seeing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 13, 2010, 09:17:43 PM
Great vids! I still get a charge seeing that Humvee and Motorcycle fly out of the bushes.  :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hybrid PM on May 13, 2010, 11:27:27 PM
WOW cool videos. I like em.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gho5t Predator on May 14, 2010, 03:59:08 AM
Reaching pretty far back into the Crichton vault half of those were clips from The Andromeda Strain movie that was on A&E a while back...Ugh i was exited to!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 14, 2010, 11:10:08 AM
Great Fan stuff so far. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: cloverfan98 on May 16, 2010, 11:13:36 PM
Anyone else looking forward to the new IDW Jurassic Park Redemption series?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Noir-Gojira on May 17, 2010, 02:58:05 AM
Redemption will be cool, but I want them to reprint the Raptor series.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on May 18, 2010, 12:43:24 AM
I don't really like the idea of Tim creating a dinosaur petting zoo in Texas. Redemption should have gone back to Isla Nublar.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on May 18, 2010, 07:17:17 PM
Quote from: Skinner on May 18, 2010, 12:43:24 AM
I don't really like the idea of Tim creating a dinosaur petting zoo in Texas. Redemption should have gone back to Isla Nublar.

same here
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on May 18, 2010, 07:23:38 PM
You would think after what Tim experienced he would be against this idea.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on May 20, 2010, 06:58:22 PM
Quote from: Skinner on May 18, 2010, 07:23:38 PM
You would think after what Tim experienced he would be against this idea.

well.....

i do recall seeing an eerie amused look in Tim's eyes when all the chaos was happening.  deep down inside, i think he loved the experience.

just kiddin.  i don't get why he is for the idea either.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 20, 2010, 08:51:28 PM
"Look at the blood."

Yeah, that kid's definitely got some psychological issues.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on May 21, 2010, 01:49:20 AM
i think he is just like his uncle.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: urban_predator83 on May 21, 2010, 02:37:39 AM
I hope Steven Speilburg returns as director
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MrBrokenTusks. on May 22, 2010, 11:33:20 AM
As long as he is a producer or something I am fine :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Jun 01, 2010, 07:59:26 PM
New Jurassic Park Redemption scan.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg541.imageshack.us%2Fimg541%2F3285%2Fjpar3.jpg&hash=6b8867c2e98352a8b70f03ec66a3717ccf64341d)
Really? This doesn't even look like Jurassic Park!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 01, 2010, 08:00:00 PM
Dimetrodon + Gorgonops...?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 01, 2010, 08:03:28 PM
Definitely Dimetrodon, but the skull looks like that of a Gorgonops. Not surprising since they're related...I think.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 01, 2010, 08:04:59 PM
Hence my comment lol.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.prehistoricstore.com%2Fnewitems%2Ft764.jpg&hash=3a344f78d331af980ac6018e6eaaf2857fb5def1)
Upper part isn't that bulbous.
...but who cares anyway? :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on Jun 01, 2010, 08:07:36 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 01, 2010, 08:03:28 PM
Definitely Dimetrodon, but the skull looks like that of a Gorgonops. Not surprising since they're related...I think.

As related as a shrew to a tiger.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 01, 2010, 08:12:33 PM
Both were synapsids and Reptile-Mammals. But Dimetrodon was morphologically more primitive and reptile-biased I think.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Captain Salt on Jun 01, 2010, 08:41:46 PM
Quote from: Skinner link=topic ::)=990.msg742164#msg742164 date=1275422366
New Jurassic Park Redemption scan.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg541.imageshack.us%2Fimg541%2F3285%2Fjpar3.jpg&hash=6b8867c2e98352a8b70f03ec66a3717ccf64341d)
Really? This doesn't even look like Jurassic Park!

Right, because it's only Jurassic Park if it's relegated to the same two God-forsaken islands in the Pacific!  ::)

Looks awesome, actually...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on Jun 01, 2010, 08:45:23 PM
There were no mosquitoes in the paleozoic, so you and the artwork fail.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: xxxBIOHAZARDxxx on Jun 01, 2010, 08:51:39 PM
I read on some site that it is going to change Jurassic Park forever of something and that it is officially in production.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Captain Salt on Jun 01, 2010, 09:15:39 PM
Quote from: Puks on Jun 01, 2010, 08:45:23 PM
There were no mosquitoes in the paleozoic, so you and the artwork fail.

There were biting insects, or they could just use the Loy Extraction technique where DNA is removed from fossil bones, as described in the NOVEL.

So you and your comment fail!  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on Jun 01, 2010, 09:24:23 PM
I wonder how a Meganeura made it's appearance in the novel since it's an invertebrate..
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Captain Salt on Jun 01, 2010, 09:26:35 PM
Hard to say...I'm not sure how you'd "grow" an insect, seeing as the dinosaur embryos needed to be kept in plastic egg shells until they hatched...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: XenoVC on Jun 01, 2010, 10:44:52 PM
Who's to say the covers are completely representative of what's inside?

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Jun 01, 2010, 10:48:33 PM
Seriously, this is pathetic. The book is twenty years old, let people enjoy the new comics, even if they aren't realistic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: xxxBIOHAZARDxxx on Jun 01, 2010, 10:51:32 PM
Cant wait for movie, though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Jun 01, 2010, 11:17:31 PM
Quote from: Captain Salt on Jun 01, 2010, 08:41:46 PM
Quote from: Skinner link=topic ::)=990.msg742164#msg742164 date=1275422366
New Jurassic Park Redemption scan.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg541.imageshack.us%2Fimg541%2F3285%2Fjpar3.jpg&hash=6b8867c2e98352a8b70f03ec66a3717ccf64341d)
Really? This doesn't even look like Jurassic Park!

Right, because it's only Jurassic Park if it's relegated to the same two God-forsaken islands in the Pacific!  ::)

Looks awesome, actually...
And we have never see Dimetrodon in the movies before.  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: LarJaThwei on Jun 01, 2010, 11:51:54 PM
Anoter T-Rex better return to it's former glory and redeem itself for that sorry loss to the other one had to the Spinosaurus. I don't give a shit that it's bigger, just f**k up it's sail and it'll retreat...most likely.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 02, 2010, 12:54:48 AM
Quote from: Captain Salt on Jun 01, 2010, 09:15:39 PM
Quote from: Puks on Jun 01, 2010, 08:45:23 PM
There were no mosquitoes in the paleozoic, so you and the artwork fail.

There were biting insects, or they could just use the Loy Extraction technique where DNA is removed from fossil bones, as described in the NOVEL.

So you and your comment fail!  8)

Extracting DNA from the mosquito is fail period, since you're going to a) get tree amber and b) mosquito blood. Dinosaur DNA isn't part of the equation at that point.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Basher917 on Jun 02, 2010, 01:03:44 AM
........................... :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o to awsome...... :o :o :o :o....to..... :o :o :o......explain......why it needs to happen
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ANYTIME 420 on Jun 02, 2010, 04:52:09 AM
I dont KNOW about anyone else but i'd lo.ve to see a Carcharodontosaurus on JP IV but thats just me and more Dilophosaurs too please =/.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sylizar on Jun 02, 2010, 11:44:06 AM
I would too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ANYTIME 420 on Jun 03, 2010, 02:47:35 AM
I'd love to see a fight between A T-Rex and a Carcharadontosaurus . and less Raptors and more Dilophosaurs
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2010, 05:59:14 AM
More Dilophosaurus action, though not necessarily more than two at the most, would be good. I wouldn't want over-saturation that we suffered with the raptors.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ANYTIME 420 on Jun 03, 2010, 01:18:48 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2010, 05:59:14 AM
More Dilophosaurus action, though not necessarily more than two at the most, would be good. I wouldn't want over-saturation that we suffered with the raptors.
Thats true,A Fight between a raptor and a full grown Dilophosaur would be kick ass though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Basher917 on Jun 05, 2010, 01:51:15 PM
Allosaurus ftw!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ANYTIME 420 on Jun 06, 2010, 04:59:03 AM
Quote from: Basher917 on Jun 05, 2010, 01:51:15 PM
Allosaurus ftw!
I'd like to see a Allosaurus too honestly. I want jurassic park 4 to have a variety of different dinosaurs instead of the same raptors and t-rex routine to be honest.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jun 06, 2010, 05:24:05 AM
I'd just like them to go back to the dilo, to be honest.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: LarJaThwei on Jun 06, 2010, 06:17:28 AM
As long as the Rex is in it and kickin' ass, I'm sold.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 06, 2010, 10:33:15 AM
Quote from: LarJaThwei on Jun 06, 2010, 06:17:28 AM
As long as the Rex is in it and kickin' ass, I'm sold.

I'm with you on this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Basher917 on Jun 06, 2010, 01:38:03 PM
Quote from: Basher917 on Jun 05, 2010, 01:51:15 PM
Allosaurus ftw!

i'm with him on this
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 06, 2010, 01:40:34 PM
Quote from: Basher917 on Jun 06, 2010, 01:38:03 PM
Quote from: Basher917 on Jun 05, 2010, 01:51:15 PM
Allosaurus ftw!

i'm with him on this
*Puts on serious glasses*
The subject seems to have contracted double personality...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Basher917 on Jun 06, 2010, 01:42:11 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jun 06, 2010, 01:40:34 PM
Quote from: Basher917 on Jun 06, 2010, 01:38:03 PM
Quote from: Basher917 on Jun 05, 2010, 01:51:15 PM
Allosaurus ftw!

i'm with him on this
*Puts on serious glasses*
The subject seems to have contracted double personality...

double? more like just agreeing with myself
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 06, 2010, 01:43:11 PM
Conscious double personality! :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 06, 2010, 02:19:39 PM
Quote from: LarJaThwei on Jun 06, 2010, 06:17:28 AM
As long as the Rex is in it and kickin' ass, I'm sold.

I want a Spino/Rex rematch!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 06, 2010, 02:50:35 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 06, 2010, 02:19:39 PM
Quote from: LarJaThwei on Jun 06, 2010, 06:17:28 AM
As long as the Rex is in it and kickin' ass, I'm sold.

I want a Spino/Rex rematch!
I don't.
It would smell like a "film-done-because-of-rexy-revenge"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Jun 06, 2010, 02:59:11 PM
Like Avp:R was to Avp
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 06, 2010, 03:36:56 PM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Jun 06, 2010, 02:59:11 PM
Like Avp:R was to Avp
Bingo. 'Cept Predators did get some glory in AvP.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Noir-Gojira on Jun 06, 2010, 07:54:31 PM
The right way to do it is to have something beat the crap out of Spino and then have the T. Rex kick its ass.  That means additional fight scenes, win-win ^_^
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Jun 06, 2010, 08:38:17 PM
Hey, the fight in JP3 was only dopey 'cos the Rex had the Spino by the neck first. Even then, the Spino could have pwned it's ass easy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: LarJaThwei on Jun 06, 2010, 09:15:53 PM
Quote from: War Wager on Jun 06, 2010, 08:38:17 PM
Hey, the fight in JP3 was only dopey 'cos the Rex had the Spino by the neck first. Even then, the Spino could have pwned it's ass easy.

Wrong. I doubt a Spino would even try to fight a Rex, due to the fact it CANNOT live without it's sail and once that's broken, ripped off, or something like that, it's pretty much dead.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jun 06, 2010, 09:18:42 PM
That, and it most likely ate fish. The jaw isn't suited for that kinda stuff at all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Puks on Jun 06, 2010, 09:40:43 PM
Yep. Basically, it's a fight between a fish killer and a dino killer.

Guess which wins.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Jun 06, 2010, 09:46:16 PM
Goldblum?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: xxxBIOHAZARDxxx on Jun 06, 2010, 09:53:42 PM
Hell yeah! Let's preach it, fellow T.Rex lovers!

Tyrannosaurus Rex
Length:42 feet
Height:16 feet at the hips
Top Running Speed:15-25 MPH (Mostly agreed on)
Bite force:3000-9000 pounds per square inch
Diet:Hadrosaurs(Edmontosaurus, Anatotitan), Ceratopsians(Triceratops, Styracosaurus), Dead Carcasses
Final Dossier:Oppurtunistic Hunter

Spinosaurus Aegyptiacus
Length:40-55 feet
Height:18 feet at the hips
Top Running Speed:10-15 MPH(Mostly theorized and agreed upon that it could not afford to damage its sail)
Bite Force:500 pounds per square inch(Jaws were thin and muscles were small. Skull was elongated and had weak, curved teeth extremely similar to Baryonyx and Suchomimus who were also fish eaters)
Diet:Dead Carcasses, Prehistoric African River Fish
Final Dossier:Scavenger and Fisher

Conclusion: Trex would win due to its far superior strength, advanced maneuverability, faster speed and Incredible jaw power.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aADio2uStTY

Now think of THAT, the strength of the neck, head and jaws of trex, and combine it with the quickness and grace of the living trex that was killed off 65 million years ago. THAT could slaughter Spinosaurus like a pig.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Jun 06, 2010, 09:57:28 PM
*sad face*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jun 06, 2010, 10:02:47 PM
Quote from: TJ Doc on Jun 06, 2010, 09:46:16 PM
Goldblum?

Of course!

Quote from: xxxBIOHAZARDxxx on Jun 06, 2010, 09:53:42 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aADio2uStTY

Pretty damn cool.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: xxxBIOHAZARDxxx on Jun 06, 2010, 10:18:26 PM
Quote from: War Wager on Jun 06, 2010, 09:57:28 PM
*sad face*
Uh huh. Thats right. You just got beaten by paleontological fact.
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Jun 06, 2010, 10:02:47 PM

Quote from: xxxBIOHAZARDxxx on Jun 06, 2010, 09:53:42 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aADio2uStTY

Pretty damn cool.
Yeah it is.

Now back to the subject of the movie. You guys think they'll be releasing any new action figure for the movie? I collect, trade, and sell.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Noir-Gojira on Jun 06, 2010, 10:36:42 PM
Quote from: xxxBIOHAZARDxxx on Jun 06, 2010, 10:18:26 PM
Quote from: War Wager on Jun 06, 2010, 09:57:28 PM
*sad face*
Uh huh. Thats right. You just got beaten by paleontological fact.
There is no such thing as fact in science.

The video is as cool as hell, but one has to wonder if a rex's skull was actually made of steel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 07, 2010, 12:16:17 AM
Quote from: xxxBIOHAZARDxxx on Jun 06, 2010, 09:53:42 PM
Hell yeah! Let's preach it, fellow T.Rex lovers!

Tyrannosaurus Rex
Length:42 feet
Height:16 feet at the hips
Top Running Speed:15-25 MPH (Mostly agreed on)
Bite force:3000-9000 pounds per square inch
Diet:Hadrosaurs(Edmontosaurus, Anatotitan), Ceratopsians(Triceratops, Styracosaurus), Dead Carcasses
Final Dossier:Oppurtunistic Hunter

Spinosaurus Aegyptiacus
Length:40-55 feet
Height:18 feet at the hips
Top Running Speed:10-15 MPH(Mostly theorized and agreed upon that it could not afford to damage its sail)
Bite Force:500 pounds per square inch(Jaws were thin and muscles were small. Skull was elongated and had weak, curved teeth extremely similar to Baryonyx and Suchomimus who were also fish eaters)
Diet:Dead Carcasses, Prehistoric African River Fish
Final Dossier:Scavenger and Fisher

Conclusion: Trex would win due to its far superior strength, advanced maneuverability, faster speed and Incredible jaw power.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aADio2uStTY

Now think of THAT, the strength of the neck, head and jaws of trex, and combine it with the quickness and grace of the living trex that was killed off 65 million years ago. THAT could slaughter Spinosaurus like a pig.

T.Rex could not move at 25MPH. 25 KPH, sure, but MPH? You're dreaming. It's been proven through countless studies those types of speeds weren't achievable.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jun 07, 2010, 02:42:40 AM
You just had to crush his hopes, didn't you?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Noir-Gojira on Jun 07, 2010, 03:44:16 AM
Like a car in the jaws of a metal rex ^_^
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 07, 2010, 03:58:01 AM
^ What he said.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: LarJaThwei on Jun 07, 2010, 05:43:29 AM
So, the conclusion is the T-Rex is still the best dinosaur? Yes? Okay.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Noir-Gojira on Jun 07, 2010, 05:45:00 AM
Never.  Sir Richard Attenborough is.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: LarJaThwei on Jun 07, 2010, 05:48:07 AM
Quote from: Noir-Gojira on Jun 07, 2010, 05:45:00 AM
Never.  Sir Richard Attenborough is.

How could I have forgotten?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 07, 2010, 12:38:54 PM
Quote from: LarJaThwei on Jun 07, 2010, 05:43:29 AM
So, the conclusion is the T-Rex is still the best dinosaur?
Quote from: Noir-Gojira on Jun 07, 2010, 05:45:00 AM
Never.  Sir Richard Attenborough is.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jMMrRmCLXo
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 07, 2010, 01:56:56 PM
Please Johnny, you will never be the next Capt. Kirk!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Jun 07, 2010, 04:40:57 PM
You know, I've always wondered what Hammond shouts in that scene...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Captain Salt on Jun 07, 2010, 04:49:22 PM
^^^ "GRRAAAAAANNNTTTTT"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: LarJaThwei on Jun 07, 2010, 04:57:41 PM
They've been putting JP on TV alot lately. 1 and 2....thankfully not 3.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 07, 2010, 05:18:23 PM
Quote from: War Wager on Jun 07, 2010, 04:40:57 PM
You know, I've always wondered what Hammond shouts in that scene...
It's either GRAAAANT or DOOOOON'T, second one because maybe he doesn't want the dinosaurs to be harmed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: LarJaThwei on Jun 07, 2010, 06:13:06 PM
Or maybe he doesn't want his grandkids to be harmed, lol.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 07, 2010, 07:06:43 PM
It's GRAAAAANT. Says so in the subtitles.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Jun 08, 2010, 07:49:58 PM
http://www.destructoid.com/telltale-making-episodic-jurassic-park-game-for-realz--175798.phtml
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 08, 2010, 07:52:34 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LyGMiwOGBfM
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 08, 2010, 07:53:53 PM
That is so hilarious it is heart-attack inducing :D :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jun 08, 2010, 10:29:45 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 08, 2010, 07:52:34 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LyGMiwOGBfM

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi787.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fyy151%2FTJDocT84%2FSpaceMarinesseal-of-approval.jpg&hash=4266aa5db1cb3c9c5dc12897cec071d8ba62527e)

Quote from: Skinner on Jun 08, 2010, 07:49:58 PM
http://www.destructoid.com/telltale-making-episodic-jurassic-park-game-for-realz--175798.phtml

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg191.imageshack.us%2Fimg191%2F7026%2Fnewman.jpg&hash=9779cc97ab1b4e5e196998427c0cfe83b66009a5)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: XenoVC on Jun 08, 2010, 10:38:48 PM
Quote from: Skinner on Jun 08, 2010, 07:49:58 PM
http://www.destructoid.com/telltale-making-episodic-jurassic-park-game-for-realz--175798.phtml

Holy sheet.

First a new comic series and a friggin game now?

Things are picking up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: xxxBIOHAZARDxxx on Jun 09, 2010, 12:18:59 AM
Quote from: Noir-Gojira on Jun 07, 2010, 03:44:16 AM
Like a car in the jaws of a metal rex ^_^
Well, still. It didn't have to be metal. That machine was purely just exerting the power of the jaws. So SCREW YOU!!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Jun 09, 2010, 12:24:20 AM
Quote from: XenoVC on Jun 08, 2010, 10:38:48 PM
Quote from: Skinner on Jun 08, 2010, 07:49:58 PM
http://www.destructoid.com/telltale-making-episodic-jurassic-park-game-for-realz--175798.phtml

Holy sheet.

First a new comic series and a friggin game now?

Things are picking up.
Getting ready for Jurassic Park IV, I guess.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Noir-Gojira on Jun 09, 2010, 03:54:52 AM
Quote from: xxxBIOHAZARDxxx on Jun 09, 2010, 12:18:59 AM
Quote from: Noir-Gojira on Jun 07, 2010, 03:44:16 AM
Like a car in the jaws of a metal rex ^_^
Well, still. It didn't have to be metal. That machine was purely just exerting the power of the jaws. So SCREW YOU!!!!!
Force goes both ways, so a bone jaw may or may not have broken while exerting that much pressure.

JP:Redemption is out next week!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 09, 2010, 03:57:36 AM
Quote from: Skinner on Jun 08, 2010, 07:49:58 PM
http://www.destructoid.com/telltale-making-episodic-jurassic-park-game-for-realz--175798.phtml

Nice, I wonder what type of game it might be...FPS?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Jun 09, 2010, 04:06:55 AM
Like this?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmuseodelvideojuego.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2008%2F12%2Fjurassic-park-004.jpg&hash=9ce558e9e6c599c13ad722692daadf60d7813406)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 09, 2010, 04:10:14 AM
Now that you mention it...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: xxxBIOHAZARDxxx on Jun 09, 2010, 04:14:26 AM
Quote from: Noir-Gojira on Jun 09, 2010, 03:54:52 AM
Quote from: xxxBIOHAZARDxxx on Jun 09, 2010, 12:18:59 AM
Quote from: Noir-Gojira on Jun 07, 2010, 03:44:16 AM
Like a car in the jaws of a metal rex ^_^
Well, still. It didn't have to be metal. That machine was purely just exerting the power of the jaws. So SCREW YOU!!!!!
Force goes both ways, so a bone jaw may or may not have broken while exerting that much pressure.

JP:Redemption is out next week!
What's JP redemption?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Noir-Gojira on Jun 09, 2010, 06:31:50 AM
Google it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: LarJaThwei on Jun 09, 2010, 06:33:38 AM
Quote from: Noir-Gojira on Jun 09, 2010, 06:31:50 AM
Google it.

I knew that helpful information was coming, lol.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: XenoVC on Jun 09, 2010, 06:56:01 AM
Quote from: SM on Jun 09, 2010, 04:06:55 AM
Like this?

http://museodelvideojuego.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/jurassic-park-004.jpg

The endless coins spent replaying this at Chuck E Cheese's.

Hell yes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 09, 2010, 03:38:26 PM
That game is so old now, the only one that's still around is The Lost World. I only played the JP version once. As I recall in that screen, the objective in that scenario was to kill the T.Rex and if you didn't, you move on to the next area right?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Jun 09, 2010, 03:55:42 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc08.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2Ff%2F2010%2F079%2Fe%2Fa%2Fyes1_by_soulfire_zf9.jpg&hash=3ea65ab0450635a58060d31ac8260d4bc124c09a)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Captain Salt on Jun 09, 2010, 05:01:42 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jun 07, 2010, 05:18:23 PM
Quote from: War Wager on Jun 07, 2010, 04:40:57 PM
You know, I've always wondered what Hammond shouts in that scene...
It's either GRAAAANT or DOOOOON'T, second one because maybe he doesn't want the dinosaurs to be harmed.

At that point in his character arc he'd clearly decided to care more about the people trapped on the island that the dinosaurs. He was in the middle of a phone call with Grant, (who was with his grandchildren) which was cut off by gun shots. Hence: "GGRRRRRRAAAAANNNNNTTT!!!!!!!"

Quote from: Noir-Gojira on Jun 09, 2010, 03:54:52 AM
JP:Redemption is out next week!

Actually these two sites both have it listed for the 30th:

http://www.tfaw.com/Profile/Jurassic-Park-Redemption-1___362632

http://decomicshop.nl/jurassic-park-redemption-copy-yeates-p-30769.html?osCsid=313c3b0ba3605aaaa0363563dd59e9ad
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 09, 2010, 11:09:27 PM
Oh it's a comic! I thought it was a fan film...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Noir-Gojira on Jun 10, 2010, 12:02:47 AM
Quote from: Captain Salt on Jun 09, 2010, 05:01:42 PM
Actually these two sites both have it listed for the 30th:

http://www.tfaw.com/Profile/Jurassic-Park-Redemption-1___362632

http://decomicshop.nl/jurassic-park-redemption-copy-yeates-p-30769.html?osCsid=313c3b0ba3605aaaa0363563dd59e9ad
Then . . . I get to enjoy it before everyone else! ^_^
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 10, 2010, 12:07:48 AM
Excited for the game! Should be great. Since a Ghostbusters game last year, and a Jurassic Park game coming out soon, I wonder how long before a Tremors game?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 10, 2010, 12:20:22 AM
Don't hold your breath. Tremors isn't the same league as JP.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 10, 2010, 12:27:02 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 10, 2010, 12:20:22 AM
Don't hold your breath. Tremors isn't the same league as JP.

Yeah, I know. But in 2003 they were making a Tremors game, and were almost finished, and then it was canceled. They were not allowed to release any images or anything after it was canceled. :(

Oh well, can't wait for the JP game!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Noir-Gojira on Jun 10, 2010, 01:13:23 AM
I want another fighting game, like Warpath.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Captain Salt on Jun 10, 2010, 02:30:40 AM
Quote from: Noir-Gojira on Jun 10, 2010, 12:02:47 AM
Quote from: Captain Salt on Jun 09, 2010, 05:01:42 PM
Actually these two sites both have it listed for the 30th:

http://www.tfaw.com/Profile/Jurassic-Park-Redemption-1___362632

http://decomicshop.nl/jurassic-park-redemption-copy-yeates-p-30769.html?osCsid=313c3b0ba3605aaaa0363563dd59e9ad
Then . . . I get to enjoy it before everyone else! ^_^

Oh, thanks!  :P

Perhaps IDW's digital version will end up being released earlier...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 10, 2010, 02:46:22 AM
Quote from: Noir-Gojira on Jun 10, 2010, 01:13:23 AM
I want another fighting game, like Warpath.

And preferably, one with balanced difficulty and isn't a button-mash fest :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Noir-Gojira on Jun 10, 2010, 02:50:52 AM
But that isn't like Warpath at all! :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 10, 2010, 04:37:39 AM
Which game were you playing lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Noir-Gojira on Jun 10, 2010, 04:50:57 AM
I played on a DDR pad -_^
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 10, 2010, 10:45:25 AM
Operation Genesis is still the best Jurassic Park game.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Jun 11, 2010, 01:29:14 AM
NO! Tresspaser is! the story is the best one yet, and the mlevel design and mechanics are still to be matched!

if only it had more time to get completed  :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: XenoVC on Jun 11, 2010, 02:10:36 AM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Jun 11, 2010, 01:29:14 AM
NO! Tresspaser is! the story is the best one yet, and the mlevel design and mechanics are still to be matched!

if only it had more time to get completed  :'(

Not even touching this. D:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: LarJaThwei on Jun 11, 2010, 05:13:19 AM
The floppy gun in Trespasser was my favorite.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TheMonolith on Jun 11, 2010, 05:57:09 AM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Jun 11, 2010, 01:29:14 AM
NO! Tresspaser is! the story is the best one yet, and the mlevel design and mechanics are still to be matched!

if only it had more time to get completed  :'(

High five! TRESSPASSER KICKS ASS! Would be perfect for the next flick!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Jun 11, 2010, 12:29:02 PM
*gives high fice back*


tresspaser history was amazing, the voice acting was stelar and if Ann had made it into jurassic park III instead of that dumb ass boy, it would be a much better movie.


just think about it, a lone survivor in isla sorna
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 11, 2010, 03:10:11 PM
Sounds boring. What's she going to do, speak to herself the entire film?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Jun 11, 2010, 04:28:18 PM
she did in the game, also, the Hammond monologues man, the monologues  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TheMonolith on Jun 11, 2010, 04:38:23 PM
Doesn't mean you can't throw more characters in.
If it was one person, you know they will get away in a JP flick.
I would like to see the return of the now grown Lex and Tim, Annie, the plane's pilot, and other interesting characters to fill out that cast.
They should also use the monologues from the game. They were awesome.
The main reason this would make a great JP movie was the level designs. They were frigging awesome! That is what the island should look like. The beach, the monorail, the canyon, the town, the dam, the docks, the labs, the mountain, all were gorgeous and would look doubly gorgeous on the big screen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 11, 2010, 05:18:24 PM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Jun 11, 2010, 04:28:18 PM
she did in the game, also, the Hammond monologues man, the monologues  :P

Try doing that for a two hour long movie and see how long you keep people's interest.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Anto of the Sand on Jun 11, 2010, 05:18:59 PM
Are they really making this ?
Its gotta suck.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 11, 2010, 05:20:14 PM
What, a Trespasser movie? No, people are just throwing the idea out there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Jun 11, 2010, 05:24:42 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 11, 2010, 05:18:24 PM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Jun 11, 2010, 04:28:18 PM
she did in the game, also, the Hammond monologues man, the monologues  :P

Try doing that for a two hour long movie and see how long you keep people's interest.

read monoliths' post


also: in industrial jungle lavel you can find the 2001 monolith on a hil if you are a good climber
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Anto of the Sand on Jun 11, 2010, 05:26:53 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 11, 2010, 05:20:14 PM
What, a Trespasser movie? No, people are just throwing the idea out there.
No no, I mean JP IV.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Undeadite on Jun 11, 2010, 05:36:47 PM
It's been in speculative development hell for nearly a decade. Planning stopped cold after Crichton passed away, but every once in a while a rumor pops up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Jun 11, 2010, 05:38:40 PM
I am hoping it's Joe Johnston's next project after Captain America.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 11, 2010, 05:45:04 PM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Jun 11, 2010, 05:24:42 PM
read monoliths' post

Quote from: TheMonolith on Jun 11, 2010, 05:57:09 AM
High five! TRESSPASSER KICKS ASS! Would be perfect for the next flick!

You mean this one? Not really telling me much.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 11, 2010, 06:25:30 PM
A story based upon Trespasser would be interesting.
BUT
I want Warpath.
;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 11, 2010, 07:05:40 PM
T.Rex jump kicking and Styracosaurus doing back flips FTW!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 11, 2010, 07:07:59 PM
Or the hysterical Suchomimus!! God I love that dinosaur! :D :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Anto of the Sand on Jun 11, 2010, 08:40:44 PM
Just when the protagonists are getting away at the end.....Grimlock !!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Jun 22, 2010, 12:18:45 AM
Jurassic Park Redemption Preview
http://previews.diamondcomics.com/public/default.asp?t=1&m=1&c=6&s=783&ai=96478
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 22, 2010, 09:59:05 AM
So digging the Carnotaurus. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: brennan4 on Jun 22, 2010, 04:24:25 PM
http://www.telltalegames.com/nbcuni
This looks interesting.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jun 22, 2010, 06:55:33 PM
Yay!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Jun 22, 2010, 07:03:23 PM
If it ever sees the light of day (which I doubt it will, save for maybe on handheld platforms), the Back to the Future game will be failtastic. You read it here first, people!

And to be honest, I'm not feeling particularly optimistic about the JP game either.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: XenoVC on Jun 22, 2010, 07:05:06 PM
I guess that JP3 style T-rex logo is the one being put on all merchandise now?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: brennan4 on Jun 22, 2010, 07:22:38 PM
Has been for a little while now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 22, 2010, 07:49:59 PM
Call me old-fashioned, but the original logo was nicer to look at.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 22, 2010, 07:51:06 PM
I prefer the scarred TLW's.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 22, 2010, 11:27:33 PM
I think the original logo is the best, though the others aren't bad. If this does good, maybe we'll get another movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Jun 23, 2010, 02:12:06 PM
More info on the Jurassic Park game.
http://www.joystiq.com/2010/06/21/telltales-jurassic-park-games-to-be-cinematically-much-more-se/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 23, 2010, 06:03:33 PM
Would be nice if they could tell us what type of gameplay it will be. What exactly does "cinematic gaming" entail?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Jun 23, 2010, 06:05:12 PM
Better not be like Heavy Rain.  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Jun 27, 2010, 08:37:44 PM
what would be wrong with that? heavy rain was really good, maybe if it was cinematic like heavy rain, but without the QTE based control interface. that would be ideal
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Jun 27, 2010, 09:17:29 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 23, 2010, 06:03:33 PM
Would be nice if they could tell us what type of gameplay it will be. What exactly does "cinematic gaming" entail?

I am hoping when they say that, they mean like Uncharted.  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Jun 27, 2010, 10:50:46 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on Jun 27, 2010, 08:37:44 PM
what would be wrong with that?

If it does turn out like HR (or Fahrenheit before it), then you may as well dim the lights, get a bag of crisps, sit back and watch it like a movie on YouTube.

Quotemaybe if it was cinematic like heavy rain, but without the QTE based control interface. that would be ideal

That would be better.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 27, 2010, 11:26:39 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Jun 27, 2010, 09:17:29 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 23, 2010, 06:03:33 PM
Would be nice if they could tell us what type of gameplay it will be. What exactly does "cinematic gaming" entail?

I am hoping when they say that, they mean like Uncharted.  :)

Action adventure would be ideal! Uncharted had a great setting too with the jungle. Hell, I wouldn't mind seeing dinosaurs running through the ruins.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Jun 28, 2010, 08:44:18 AM
i don't think a JP game would really suit a guns blazing action adventure game, i think it would work better like a survival horror, but the kind where you don't really have weapons, or you get the occasional weapon but you only have a small amount of ammo and you would rather not have to use it. i think silent hill is a bit like that isn't it? going round from a to b, flipping switches, getting the powergrid online, trying to get past dinos safely, building up an inventory of useful items like bait, flares, scientific instuments, etc.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 28, 2010, 09:08:29 AM
Sounds good for the environment type, but personally, I would find that very boring because I found Silent Hill boring. Survival horror is good idea as well, but we already got that in Dino Crisis 2 which was an excellent game and easily the best dinosaur game ever made. I'm all for action/adventure a la Uncharted.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Jun 28, 2010, 09:15:09 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 28, 2010, 09:08:29 AM
Sounds good for the environment type, but personally, I would find that very boring because I found Silent Hill boring. Survival horror is good idea as well, but we already got that in Dino Crisis 2 which was an excellent game and easily the best dinosaur game ever made. I'm all for action/adventure a la Uncharted.

but maybe silent hill was boring because as a character you were alone, and story segments were few and far between, say if they took the storytelling from uncharted, the cinematic feel from heavy rain, and the puzzle based focus on survival rather than killing the bad guys from silent hill, how about that?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 28, 2010, 10:13:11 AM
That sounds pretty good. Jurassic Park is about survival so it makes sense.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 14, 2010, 03:31:07 PM
there hasn't been much news on JPIV lately.

perhaps when Joe Johnston has another interview about Captain America.  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 14, 2010, 06:02:43 PM
Perhaps I'd like to see an updated JPOG instead of a shooter...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jul 14, 2010, 07:48:31 PM
I would prefer a first person shooter over a third person- less situational awareness.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Jul 14, 2010, 07:50:56 PM
Yar.

Immersion, immersion, immersion.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jul 14, 2010, 08:03:11 PM
Don't get me wrong- I was completely immersed in Uncharted, but I just wouldn't want that to be the Jurassic Park experience. I know about Jurassic Park: Survivor, and I've played Jurassic Park: Trespasser (which was a disappointment in many regards, but it had so much potential), and I just feel like the Jurassic Park franchise is better suited for the First person perspective (with the exception of Operation Genesis, which is AWESOME).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TheCrimsonIdol on Jul 15, 2010, 01:07:58 AM
I'd go see it if it ever saw the light of day. If it doesn't, I won't be too upset since I didn't like the sequels much.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 15, 2010, 01:50:06 AM
It likely won't happen at this point. There's no interest on anyone's part it seems.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: XenoVC on Jul 15, 2010, 02:32:20 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jul 14, 2010, 06:02:43 PM
Perhaps I'd like to see an updated JPOG instead of a shooter...

This.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 16, 2010, 10:35:42 AM
Just... just imagine it. With monstrous graphics and over 100 dinosaur species to select from to expose them in your park... with selectable skintones for each from the films. Like, you can choose to show Jp T.rex or TLW T.Rex. Maybe with more twists and like, once in a session, Nedry goes how he did in the film and you have to save the park. Man... that would be a jp game.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 16, 2010, 08:40:01 PM
Are those types of games still popular?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 16, 2010, 08:40:31 PM
Managerials? They never get old.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Jul 16, 2010, 11:09:34 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jul 16, 2010, 08:40:31 PM
Managerials? They never get old.

exactly, but they don't bother making them any more, since there are a few (there hospital, dungeon keeper, JPOG) that can't be beat, so why try?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 17, 2010, 06:24:44 AM
Format may never get old, but is there really a market for them still? I can't remember the last game I heard that came out like that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nope on Jul 17, 2010, 06:38:39 AM
im not sure if theres any more but another jpog would cause an orgasm!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 17, 2010, 11:26:58 AM
Let's also not forget JP has a monstrously big fanbase. I bet a new and updated JPOG would be a good move.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nope on Jul 17, 2010, 08:41:22 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jul 17, 2010, 11:26:58 AM
Let's also not forget JP has a monstrously big fanbase. I bet a new and updated JPOG would be a good move.
I would think some of the fanbase would have dissipated in the last nine years since the last film
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Captain Salt on Jul 17, 2010, 09:40:15 PM
^^ Most of it has... :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nope on Jul 17, 2010, 09:43:40 PM
Quote from: Captain Salt on Jul 17, 2010, 09:40:15 PM
^^ Most of it has... :'(
:-[ Im still in the fanbase :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Jul 17, 2010, 09:45:51 PM
Quote from: Captain Salt on Jul 17, 2010, 09:40:15 PM
^^ Most of it has... :'(

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jMMrRmCLXo
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 17, 2010, 10:02:17 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Jul 17, 2010, 09:45:51 PM
Quote from: Captain Salt on Jul 17, 2010, 09:40:15 PM
^^ Most of it has... :'(

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jMMrRmCLXo

ditto

i love that video.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Captain Salt on Jul 17, 2010, 11:58:32 PM
Quote from: shobidoo on Jul 17, 2010, 09:43:40 PM
Quote from: Captain Salt on Jul 17, 2010, 09:40:15 PM
^^ Most of it has... :'(
:-[ Im still in the fanbase :D

So am I!  ;D

If we ever get JP4, we'll probably get a bunch of returning/new members, at least temporarily...

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nope on Jul 18, 2010, 12:08:50 AM
Quote from: Captain Salt on Jul 17, 2010, 11:58:32 PM
Quote from: shobidoo on Jul 17, 2010, 09:43:40 PM
Quote from: Captain Salt on Jul 17, 2010, 09:40:15 PM
^^ Most of it has... :'(
:-[ Im still in the fanbase :D

So am I!  ;D

If we ever get JP4, we'll probably get a bunch of returning/new members, at least temporarily...
If jp4 is anounced Jeff Goldblum better be in it!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: vikingspawn on Jul 18, 2010, 01:02:15 AM
There's a new "Jurassic Park" comic series out from IDW:

http://www.idwpublishing.com/news/article/1145/

The first five-issue story arc in IDW's new Jurassic Park series, Jurassic Park: Redemption, takes up thirteen years after the very first Jurassic Park motion picture and finds John Hammond's grandchildren, Tim and Lex Murphy, as well-to-do young adults. While Lex is working with the UN to continue keeping people off of both Isla Nublar and Isla Sorna -- her brother Tim has other ideas about how to get their grandfather's name back in good standing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nope on Jul 18, 2010, 01:24:28 AM
Quote from: vikingspawn on Jul 18, 2010, 01:02:15 AM
There's a new "Jurassic Park" comic series out from IDW:

http://www.idwpublishing.com/news/article/1145/

The first five-issue story arc in IDW's new Jurassic Park series, Jurassic Park: Redemption, takes up thirteen years after the very first Jurassic Park motion picture and finds John Hammond's grandchildren, Tim and Lex Murphy, as well-to-do young adults. While Lex is working with the UN to continue keeping people off of both Isla Nublar and Isla Sorna -- her brother Tim has other ideas about how to get their grandfather's name back in good standing.
Theres also going to be a new jurassic park game from Telltale Games
http://www.destructoid.com/telltale-s-jurassic-park-series-will-be-more-serious-177145.phtml
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 25, 2010, 06:00:05 PM
Quote from: alienhunter14 on Jul 25, 2010, 05:58:08 PM
-alienhunter14(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdata-allocine.blogomaniac.fr%2Fmdata%2F1%2F1%2F5%2FZ20070221185053293911511%2Fimg%2Fjurassic_park_4__3_.jpg&hash=6c5dcb5d95588384e406097781cfa56e889803a5)
Cool poster :) But the Pteranodons trade its photoshop origins. :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: XenoVC on Jul 25, 2010, 06:47:07 PM
Picked up the first issue of Redemption...it felt really odd doing so.

I mean,it's the first JP related thing I've picked up since....2001.  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 27, 2010, 12:45:56 AM
Any good?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: XenoVC on Jul 27, 2010, 01:48:55 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 27, 2010, 12:45:56 AM
Any good?

It's surprisingly okish.

The concept is still pretty bad,but for a comic series,it could pick up steam.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Jul 28, 2010, 01:24:30 PM
In case any of you are interested, there is an upcoming fan-film. The animation in it may not be all perfect but it's done with the heart and the soul that the franchise would deserve.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idXN1G6tcD4
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Jul 28, 2010, 02:43:02 PM
Quote from: alienhunter14 on Jul 27, 2010, 01:45:03 AM
I think that the jurassic park movie need a reboot!!! :)

-alienhunter14

get out. and shut the door behind you  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jul 28, 2010, 02:46:32 PM
Quote from: Keg on Jul 28, 2010, 02:43:02 PM
Quote from: alienhunter14 on Jul 27, 2010, 01:45:03 AM
I think that the jurassic park movie need a reboot!!! :)

-alienhunter14

get out. and shut the door behind you  :P


I'd support that if it was rebooted following the novel closely. I'd pay big bucks for that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 28, 2010, 02:54:18 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jul 28, 2010, 02:46:32 PM
I'd support that if it was rebooted following the novel closely. I'd pay big bucks for that.
Best thing is that there would be no excuse to put feathers on dinosaurs to "refresh" them, since in the novel, there are genetic abominations.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Jul 28, 2010, 02:58:42 PM
No no no. The original movie was fantastic. And I love The Lost World too. JPIII was poor in comparison but was still a good sequel. Enough with the remakes and reboots of film franchies that dont need them. Just give us a sequel with the awesome ending of the novel where the whole ending gets carpet bombed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jul 28, 2010, 04:07:25 PM
Quote from: Keg on Jul 28, 2010, 02:58:42 PM
No no no. The original movie was fantastic. And I love The Lost World too. JPIII was poor in comparison but was still a good sequel.

I share your thoughts on the movies. Jurassic Park is my favourite movie of all time. The Lost World is terribly underrated and a great sequel. And Jurassic Park 3, while it needed a way better script, was still a well-handled adventure movie with some really cool scenes and concepts.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Captain Salt on Jul 28, 2010, 11:26:49 PM
Quote from: Nychus on Jul 28, 2010, 01:24:30 PM
In case any of you are interested, there is an upcoming fan-film. The animation in it may not be all perfect but it's done with the heart and the soul that the franchise would deserve.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idXN1G6tcD4

ASS! ASS I say!!!






Ass.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Captain Salt on Jul 29, 2010, 07:07:36 PM
^^ I think that, AAAASSSSS!  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 29, 2010, 07:09:58 PM
Quote from: Keg on Jul 28, 2010, 02:58:42 PM
No no no. The original movie was fantastic. And I love The Lost World too. JPIII was poor in comparison but was still a good sequel. Enough with the remakes and reboots of film franchies that dont need them. Just give us a sequel with the awesome ending of the novel where the whole ending gets carpet bombed.

JP 3 couldn't hold a candle to the first two. The stories were great, and the acting was, IMO, close to first-class. JP 3 felt like a group of teens just threw something in a pot and pulled it out. A new dinosaur was all that film had to offer.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 29, 2010, 07:11:50 PM
Pteranodon scene for the win.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 29, 2010, 07:20:29 PM
Yeah, OK, that was good scene. Nice to see something new there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Captain Salt on Jul 29, 2010, 07:23:52 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jul 29, 2010, 07:11:50 PM
Pteranodon scene for the win.

The only good thing about JP3, sadly...Well, that and seeing Grant and Ellie again after eight years. The rest was a disaster.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 30, 2010, 11:54:24 AM
One thing I ain't like of the film (and on which I'll never change opinion) is that they made Ellie married with another guy. I mean, it's pointless. All the buildup in Jp, for nothin'?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Jul 30, 2010, 12:08:01 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 29, 2010, 07:09:58 PM
Quote from: Keg on Jul 28, 2010, 02:58:42 PM
No no no. The original movie was fantastic. And I love The Lost World too. JPIII was poor in comparison but was still a good sequel. Enough with the remakes and reboots of film franchies that dont need them. Just give us a sequel with the awesome ending of the novel where the whole ending gets carpet bombed.

JP 3 couldn't hold a candle to the first two. The stories were great, and the acting was, IMO, close to first-class. JP 3 felt like a group of teens just threw something in a pot and pulled it out. A new dinosaur was all that film had to offer.

Didnt claim it could hold a candle to the first two. it pales in comparison. But if you take it for what it is, its still an enjoyable monster movie. And its still alot better than other films in the genre. If it was a standalone adventure film, not related to jurassic park, would people have been so harsh? I dont think they would no. its an average, decent movie with a couple of great set pieces that make it worth a watch. But its certainly not horrible. Although the phone still ringing after the spinos eaten always makes me doubt why i defend it?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 30, 2010, 12:31:03 PM
Quote from: Keg on Jul 30, 2010, 12:08:01 PM
Although the phone still ringing after the spinos eaten always makes me doubt why i defend it?
Peter Pan reference.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Jul 30, 2010, 12:53:24 PM
It doesn't matter what it's a reference to, it doesn't belong and its ludicrous. So a phone that is now inside the stomach of a massive dinosaur is still in full working order and can recieve a signal? To top it off it rings so loudly that a group of people standing 100 ft away can hear it inside the dinosaur as though its right there in their pocket? Oh dear, how that was allowed to be left in the final movie is beyond me.  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Captain Salt on Jul 30, 2010, 11:17:41 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jul 30, 2010, 11:54:24 AM
One thing I ain't like of the film (and on which I'll never change opinion) is that they made Ellie married with another guy. I mean, it's pointless. All the buildup in Jp, for nothin'?

I didn't mind that. That's realistic...people aren't necessarily with the same person they were with eight years ago.

Besides, gives a bit of a melancholy bent to Grant and Ellie in the film...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sylizar on Jul 31, 2010, 12:12:12 AM
Quote from: Keg on Jul 30, 2010, 12:53:24 PM
It doesn't matter what it's a reference to, it doesn't belong and its ludicrous. So a phone that is now inside the stomach of a massive dinosaur is still in full working order and can recieve a signal? To top it off it rings so loudly that a group of people standing 100 ft away can hear it inside the dinosaur as though its right there in their pocket? Oh dear, how that was allowed to be left in the final movie is beyond me.  :-\

Bcause it's creepy as hell.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Captain Salt on Jul 31, 2010, 12:23:36 AM
^^ Not quite the vibrating puddle of water, though, is it?  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 31, 2010, 01:09:45 AM
Quote from: Sylizar on Jul 31, 2010, 12:12:12 AM
Quote from: Keg on Jul 30, 2010, 12:53:24 PM
It doesn't matter what it's a reference to, it doesn't belong and its ludicrous. So a phone that is now inside the stomach of a massive dinosaur is still in full working order and can recieve a signal? To top it off it rings so loudly that a group of people standing 100 ft away can hear it inside the dinosaur as though its right there in their pocket? Oh dear, how that was allowed to be left in the final movie is beyond me.  :-\

Bcause it's creepy as hell.

It's creepy, but once you realize where it's coming from like Keg pointed out, you realize how stupid it really is.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Jul 31, 2010, 01:12:13 AM
I found it a bit of a stretch that the kid lasted as long as he did (without weapons) and the mercenaries were killed within 1 minute of showing up on the island.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 31, 2010, 01:14:14 AM
Mercs can be stupid. Kids learn rather quickly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Captain Salt on Jul 31, 2010, 01:16:07 AM
But why was the kid still so f**king fat? I mean, not Noland fat, but still...

I think he ate Ben Hildebrant, (the guy hanging in the tree).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 31, 2010, 01:20:25 AM
Had he done so, he probably would have died from his arteries clogging up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nope on Aug 03, 2010, 03:22:59 AM
IF they did a blu-ray dvd collection i would definatly buy
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Aug 03, 2010, 03:36:52 AM
Quote from: shobidoo on Aug 03, 2010, 03:22:59 AM
IF they did a blu-ray dvd collection i would definatly buy

Same. So far Spielberg hasn't re-released much of his collection on Blu-ray.  :'(

Also waiting for Indiana Jones Blu-ray collection.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Aug 21, 2010, 10:27:43 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Z6wwy98Ko4
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Aug 21, 2010, 11:20:30 PM
Awesome! Too bad it wasn't on the iPod.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Aug 22, 2010, 12:23:25 AM
I can't picture Ian Malcolm firing a machine gun though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Aug 22, 2010, 12:47:20 AM
Quote from: Skinner on Aug 22, 2010, 12:23:25 AM
I can't picture Ian Malcolm firing a machine gun though.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi374.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Foo183%2FJAROSHULK28%2FMALCOLMFUNNY.jpg&hash=2cabd87ef6ee5efd6b065a651a8e603f29985490)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: galaxys ultimate hunter on Aug 22, 2010, 01:41:24 AM
Just my opinion but jurassic park sucks! In every movie its the same story.
1.dinosaurs on island park
2.people on island
3.shit hits the fan people try to get off
4.they get out
5.happens in all three movies
Worst excues for a franchise ever!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Aug 22, 2010, 01:48:05 AM
>baby's first troll.jpg

if it was only your opinion then you wouldn't say it like if it was factual. you are terrible at this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Aug 22, 2010, 01:56:45 AM
Recycled ideas are what franchises are. It's the same with Alien, Predator and every other series in existence. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: galaxys ultimate hunter on Aug 22, 2010, 02:15:58 AM
Predator 2 took place in the city during a crime spree(nothing like Predator) Aliens took place in a colony on LV-426(nothing like Alien).
Don't defend jurassic park its nothing campared to them.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dachande on Aug 22, 2010, 02:45:55 AM
Jurassic Park took place, in a Dinosaur theme park. The Lost World took place on a completely seperate island and San Diego (Nothing like Jurassic Park). Jurassic Park 3 took place in a completely different part of the last islandl, and a giant aviary. (Nothing like Jurassic Park or The Lost World)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: galaxys ultimate hunter on Aug 22, 2010, 02:50:43 AM
But still on a f**king island!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dachande on Aug 22, 2010, 02:54:26 AM
Quote from: galaxys ultimate hunter on Aug 22, 2010, 02:50:43 AM
But still on a f**king island!

And all the Saw films take place in the same city. What's your point?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Aug 22, 2010, 02:55:22 AM
Quote from: galaxys ultimate hunter on Aug 22, 2010, 02:50:43 AM
But still on a f**king island!
And a city in The lost world......
And the islands were vastly different. Even in JP 3 they were in mostly forest like land, the Aviary, and an abandoned lab.
The islands aren't even a factor in this. What are you going to say next? They all had dinosaurs?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dachande on Aug 22, 2010, 02:56:37 AM
Quote from: Cap. Fitzgerald on Aug 22, 2010, 02:55:22 AM
Quote from: galaxys ultimate hunter on Aug 22, 2010, 02:50:43 AM
But still on a f**king island!
And a city in The lost world......
And the islands were vastly different. Even in JP 3 they were in mostly forest like land, the Aviary, and an abandoned lab.
The islands aren't even a factor in this. What are you going to say next? They all had dinosaurs?

Actually JP3 was more jungle than forest. TLW was mainly forest based.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: galaxys ultimate hunter on Aug 22, 2010, 02:58:26 AM
Big deal diffrent city areas, I thought we were bashing jurassic park? not SAW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Aug 22, 2010, 03:06:05 AM
Quote from: Dachande on Aug 22, 2010, 02:56:37 AM
Quote from: Cap. Fitzgerald on Aug 22, 2010, 02:55:22 AM
Quote from: galaxys ultimate hunter on Aug 22, 2010, 02:50:43 AM
But still on a f**king island!
And a city in The lost world......
And the islands were vastly different. Even in JP 3 they were in mostly forest like land, the Aviary, and an abandoned lab.
The islands aren't even a factor in this. What are you going to say next? They all had dinosaurs?

Actually JP3 was more jungle than forest. TLW was mainly forest based.
Derp..... Forgive me for that, I havent watched the third in a while.
Quote from: galaxys ultimate hunter on Aug 22, 2010, 02:58:26 AM
Big deal diffrent city areas, I thought we were bashing jurassic park? not SAW.
The same can be said for JP, different island areas. Not to mention the actually different island.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Aug 22, 2010, 03:06:25 AM
Quote from: galaxys ultimate hunter on Aug 22, 2010, 02:15:58 AM
Predator 2 took place in the city during a crime spree(nothing like Predator)

It was essentially the exact same film as the first one, but in Los Angeles.

QuoteAliens took place in a colony on LV-426(nothing like Alien).

And it followed all of the same basic beats and plot points of Alien. Cameron simply did an exceptional job at making people not notice.

All in all, the amount of change between the different JP films is about the same as the amount of change between the different Predator and Alien films.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nope on Aug 22, 2010, 07:43:32 PM
Quote from: galaxys ultimate hunter on Aug 22, 2010, 01:41:24 AM
Just my opinion but jurassic park sucks! In every movie its the same story.
1.dinosaurs on island park
2.people on island
3.shit hits the fan people try to get off
4.they get out
5.happens in all three movies
Worst excues for a franchise ever!
The franchise repeats,with varying success, what made it great in the first place. Thats what franchises do.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F_tsEAx4gImjI%2FS4YvbMn8EiI%2FAAAAAAAADOw%2FAt6ZG04JX8U%2Fs320%2Fson_i_am_disappoint_trollcat.jpg&hash=3de2ee85174c37ebf2afaf70365d07ad5dfb4ea3) 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MrBrokenTusks. on Aug 22, 2010, 07:47:41 PM
Quote from: galaxys ultimate hunter on Aug 22, 2010, 01:41:24 AM
Just my opinion but jurassic park sucks! In every movie its the same story.
1.dinosaurs on island park
2.people on island
3.shit hits the fan people try to get off
4.they get out
5.happens in all three movies
Worst excues for a franchise ever!
and you like saw right? right? good because anyone with half a brain no nearly all your complaints with the series could be said about saw. And worse ones like lack of good script lacing story, just torture porn, and those complaints about jurasic park aren't even bad things omgz noobz
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Aug 22, 2010, 08:08:33 PM
Quote from: galaxys ultimate hunter on Aug 22, 2010, 01:41:24 AM
Just my opinion but jurassic park sucks! In every movie its the same story.
1.dinosaurs on island park
2.people on island
3.shit hits the fan people try to get off
4.they get out
5.happens in all three movies
Worst excues for a franchise ever!

*ambushes galaxys ultimate hunter*

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCiLV94XlFc
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Aug 22, 2010, 08:17:12 PM
Quote from: galaxys ultimate hunter on Aug 22, 2010, 01:41:24 AM
Just my opinion but jurassic park sucks! In every movie its the same story.
1.dinosaurs on island park
2.people on island
3.shit hits the fan people try to get off
4.they get out
5.happens in all three movies
Worst excues for a franchise ever!
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi35.tinypic.com%2Fn5na5y.jpg&hash=93bf966fcf8876b12651fa8439633ff05d9f794d)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Aug 22, 2010, 08:40:09 PM
We should get back on topic......
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Aug 22, 2010, 08:44:31 PM
JPIV: Will it happen? Should it happen?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Aug 22, 2010, 08:46:17 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Aug 22, 2010, 08:44:31 PM
JPIV: Will it happen? Should it happen?

Will it?

Maybe.

Should it?

Oh, hell yes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Feral_PRED on Aug 22, 2010, 08:50:57 PM
I really want to see a fourth movie of jurassic park.

-alienhunter14
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Aug 23, 2010, 12:24:57 AM
I insist on a mockumentary style movie.

Just think of the possibilities!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MrBrokenTusks. on Aug 23, 2010, 12:39:03 AM
A perfect mix between cloverfield and D9, when I mean mix I mean cloverfields handheld effect but with D9 quality and maybe a documentary style spinetingling ending.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hive Tyrant on Aug 23, 2010, 12:41:44 AM
And lots of dinosaurs, of course.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MrBrokenTusks. on Aug 23, 2010, 12:44:44 AM
Damn Right and a dirt buggy. :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Aug 23, 2010, 12:47:47 AM
And the original (Jurassic Park/The Lost World) dinosaur designs.

It almost made me sad how non-threatening the Velociraptors in JP3 seemed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: brennan4 on Aug 23, 2010, 02:22:31 AM

An excuse to make money off desperate fans or a good game? Who knows?!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Aug 23, 2010, 02:12:57 PM
they should have just ported the old Ocean JP game
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hive Tyrant on Aug 23, 2010, 02:17:35 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Aug 23, 2010, 12:47:47 AM
And the original (Jurassic Park/The Lost World) dinosaur designs.

It almost made me sad how non-threatening the Velociraptors in JP3 seemed.

They were very clever, though. We have this theory on JPL (Jurassic Park Legacy) that the raptors in the 1st and 2nd movie are a different sub-species, that are more prone to violence and brutal strength, and the others in JP/// have more cunning and guile.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Aug 23, 2010, 02:23:39 PM
Ah, the good old "Nublarensis & Sornaensis" theory... personally, the only differences they have are the... um protofeathers on the males' necks and the paint skin. The matriarchy thing has been there since the first film if you think about it (the dominant female!), the JP3 raptors just implemented it with males. We don't see much of Raptors in Lost World to say something about their society.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Aug 23, 2010, 04:33:53 PM
All this JP hype...

the new games

new toys

updated website

Spielberg's new dino tv show

Johnston with his JPIV  news

...you know the next movie is right around the corner.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nope on Aug 23, 2010, 10:09:37 PM
Crossing my fingers that goldblum will be in this. If it happens that is. Because i just love the character he plays. And well i just love him.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Aug 23, 2010, 10:51:00 PM
Quote from: shobidoo on Aug 23, 2010, 10:09:37 PM
Crossing my fingers that goldblum will be in this. If it happens that is. Because i just love the character he plays. And well i just love him.

I can see that according to your avatar...  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 24, 2010, 12:00:15 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Aug 23, 2010, 04:33:53 PM
All this JP hype...

the new games

new toys

updated website

Spielberg's new dino tv show

Johnston with JPIV his news

...you know the next movie is right around the corner.

Not necessarily. Could just be a violent tease because Universal knows people are still interested.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: brennan4 on Aug 25, 2010, 10:36:01 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Aug 24, 2010, 12:00:15 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Aug 23, 2010, 04:33:53 PM
All this JP hype...

the new games

new toys

updated website

Spielberg's new dino tv show

Johnston with JPIV his news

...you know the next movie is right around the corner.

Not necessarily. Could just be a violent tease because Universal knows people are still interested.
T%hat's probably true, but their right.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Aug 25, 2010, 10:45:26 PM
Why do I have a feeling that JP4 is going to be in 3D?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nope on Aug 25, 2010, 10:48:38 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Aug 25, 2010, 10:45:26 PM
Why do I have a feeling that JP4 is going to be in 3D?
I wouldnt be suprised considering quite a few movies are adding 3D these days. Dinosaurs popping outa the screen! Better yet Goldblums popping outa the screen!!!!  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Aug 25, 2010, 11:03:24 PM
I'm pretty sure JP4 will be in 3D, and I do have a feel that we will see a T-Rex poping out torwards the screen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 25, 2010, 11:38:03 PM
That would be sweet. Avatar worked terrifically in Real D, so no reason why JP wouldn't.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: vikingspawn on Aug 25, 2010, 11:38:42 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Aug 23, 2010, 04:33:53 PM
All this JP hype...

the new games

new toys

updated website

Spielberg's new dino tv show

Johnston with his JPIV  news

...you know the next movie is right around the corner.

There's also the new comic mini series from IDW too:

http://www.idwpublishing.com/news/article/1145/

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: brennan4 on Aug 26, 2010, 03:33:58 PM
Quote from: vikingspawn on Aug 25, 2010, 11:38:42 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Aug 23, 2010, 04:33:53 PM
All this JP hype...

the new games

new toys

updated website

Spielberg's new dino tv show

Johnston with his JPIV  news

...you know the next movie is right around the corner.

There's also the new comic mini series from IDW too:

http://www.idwpublishing.com/news/article/1145/
By the way, is it out yet? How is it?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Aug 26, 2010, 03:39:27 PM
Quote from: vikingspawn on Aug 25, 2010, 11:38:42 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Aug 23, 2010, 04:33:53 PM
All this JP hype...

the new games

new toys

updated website

Spielberg's new dino tv show

Johnston with his JPIV  news

...you know the next movie is right around the corner.



There's also the new comic mini series from IDW too:

http://www.idwpublishing.com/news/article/1145/

that too!  see!!!


Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Aug 26, 2010, 07:27:07 PM
Do you guys think Joe Johnston can pull off a JP4 since fans still hate him for JP3 over the past nine years? People think having him do a JP4 is like Anderson doing another AVP movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 26, 2010, 08:20:43 PM
It would be. JP 3 was too short and boring. Hopefully he doesn't return since he's busy with Captain America.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Aug 26, 2010, 09:22:53 PM
How long does Universal have the rights to JP before it's ends. Universal better make it now then never.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 26, 2010, 11:11:43 PM
Aren't they indefinite?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Aug 27, 2010, 12:25:43 AM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Aug 26, 2010, 09:22:53 PM
How long does Universal have the rights to JP before it's ends. Universal better make it now then never.

they better "roger that" soon  >:(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: vikingspawn on Aug 29, 2010, 02:19:46 AM
Quote from: brennan4 on Aug 26, 2010, 03:33:58 PM
Quote from: vikingspawn on Aug 25, 2010, 11:38:42 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Aug 23, 2010, 04:33:53 PM
All this JP hype...

the new games

new toys

updated website

Spielberg's new dino tv show

Johnston with his JPIV  news

...you know the next movie is right around the corner.

There's also the new comic mini series from IDW too:

http://www.idwpublishing.com/news/article/1145/
By the way, is it out yet? How is it?

I read the first issue and it was an okay set up.   It features the now grown up grandkids of John Hammond from the first Jurassic Park movie.   The grand daughter looks like she wants to keep the dino-park closed to the public and her brother seems to have other hidden plans for it.  Can't tell if he's going to turn into the main villain yet.   Not much dino-action in the first issue but i'll pick up the rest of the run to see where it heads. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Aug 30, 2010, 10:35:48 PM
A new species of Dromaeosaur was discovered called Baldaur bondac and it had two sickle claws on each foot!
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg535.imageshack.us%2Fimg535%2F5157%2Fbaldaurfig2thumb425x568.jpg&hash=26df4e91ff5652551b0da91afff87f8d964b69d4)
http://blogs.nationalgeographic.com/blogs/news/chiefeditor/2010/08/stocky-dragon-from-transylvania.html
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Aug 31, 2010, 12:58:57 AM
are they sure isnt just two legs crushed against eachother? because that doesnt look like it could grow like that....
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Skinner on Aug 31, 2010, 01:41:33 AM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Aug 31, 2010, 12:58:57 AM
are they sure isnt just two legs crushed against eachother? because that doesnt look like it could grow like that....
The claws are different sizes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AlienHunterAACMdivision on Aug 31, 2010, 02:23:22 AM
If there's another spino as the main big dino I'll never watch it after the 1st time...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Aug 31, 2010, 03:59:52 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Aug 26, 2010, 08:20:43 PM
It would be. JP 3 was too short and boring. Hopefully he doesn't return since he's busy with Captain America.

If Spielberg has more control of the project, then I won't mind if he gets a second chance. It's better then no director at all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Noir-Gojira on Aug 31, 2010, 05:15:01 AM
Quote from: Skinner on Aug 30, 2010, 10:35:48 PM
A new species of Dromaeosaur was discovered called Baldaur bondac and it had two sickle claws on each foot!
http://blogs.nationalgeographic.com/blogs/news/chiefeditor/2010/08/stocky-dragon-from-transylvania.html
The specimen is over a decade old.  It was only described recently.  FAIL.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Aug 31, 2010, 06:10:51 AM
Technically, it's several dozen million years old.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Noir-Gojira on Aug 31, 2010, 07:26:10 AM
Pretty sure the one in the picture is just a copy :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Aug 31, 2010, 11:30:41 AM
If that pic's legit... BRICKS HAVE BEEN SHAT. :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Aug 31, 2010, 04:47:12 PM
Quote from: Skinner on Aug 30, 2010, 10:35:48 PM
http://img535.imageshack.us/img535/5157/baldaurfig2thumb425x568.jpg
Double Claw of d00m.
Would love to see it in a film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Aug 31, 2010, 06:31:48 PM
I would love to see that Raptor in a JP movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 01, 2010, 02:18:15 AM
Quote from: Noir-Gojira on Aug 31, 2010, 05:15:01 AM
Quote from: Skinner on Aug 30, 2010, 10:35:48 PM
A new species of Dromaeosaur was discovered called Baldaur bondac and it had two sickle claws on each foot!
http://blogs.nationalgeographic.com/blogs/news/chiefeditor/2010/08/stocky-dragon-from-transylvania.html
The specimen is over a decade old.  It was only described recently.  FAIL.

What's your point? Dozens of fossils stay in a lab for many years until they are finally examined closely.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Noir-Gojira on Sep 01, 2010, 03:46:06 AM
Just because it wasn't described until now doesn't mean the animal is news to everyone.  Like how velociraptor existed before Jurassic Park made it popular.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 01, 2010, 04:06:07 AM
If you're referring to paleontologists immediately involved with its discovery and subsequent publications in science journals then yes, but as far as the general public goes, it is news.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Noir-Gojira on Sep 01, 2010, 07:01:01 PM
'News' or not, the guy cheapens the effect by not knowing what he's talking about.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 02, 2010, 02:37:21 AM
You're referring to the author of the article?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Noir-Gojira on Sep 02, 2010, 03:50:41 AM
No, the guy who posted it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ShadowPred on Jan 10, 2011, 04:24:56 AM
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/?a=27652 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/?a=27652)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jan 10, 2011, 04:27:45 AM
Holy shit. :)

I like the idea of a "new direction." The old formula has gotten a bit worn-out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Jan 10, 2011, 04:28:11 AM
Quote from: ShadowPred on Jan 10, 2011, 04:24:56 AM
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/?a=27652 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/?a=27652)

Yes. Let it be true!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbalestiersda.org.sg%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2009%2F08%2Fprayer_sky.jpg&hash=40f9cde63fb3b30564e4c18d35c75695722726e5)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jan 10, 2011, 04:32:47 AM
That better to be real. If its is then its about time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on Jan 10, 2011, 05:02:02 AM
Who wants to bet they set the Universal Studios Raptors on whoever took that picture?

His last word was 'Clever--'.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Jan 10, 2011, 05:46:15 AM
Heh, I'd love to watch that from inside the tram.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jan 10, 2011, 06:09:30 AM
Quote from: ShadowPred on Jan 10, 2011, 04:24:56 AM
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/?a=27652 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/?a=27652)
*Dude comes in for the morning schedule, casually sipping coffee*

Okay, let's see what we have today..
So we've got, Desperate Housewives, alright, Parenthood, okay, Jurassic Park IV-
Spoiler
HOLY f**kING SHIT, GET THE f**k OUT AND LOCK THE DOOR.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Jan 10, 2011, 06:16:02 AM
be prepared. (http://www.velociraptors.info/)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmyfunnyworld.net%2Ffunny-wallpapers%2Ffunny-wallpaper-1680-02.jpg&hash=8d3e80a3e294e7c59186d638bf69dd0a319853f2)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Jan 10, 2011, 06:24:52 AM
That was...
informative
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 10, 2011, 07:00:58 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Jan 10, 2011, 06:09:30 AM
Quote from: ShadowPred on Jan 10, 2011, 04:24:56 AM
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/?a=27652 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/?a=27652)
*Dude comes in for the morning schedule, casually coffee*

Okay, let's see what we have today..
So we've got, Desperate Housewives, alright, Parenthood, okay, Jurassic Park IV-
Spoiler
HOLY f**kING SHIT, GET THE f**k OUT AND LOCK THE DOOR.
[close]

Pretty much this.

LET IT BE TRUE, DAMNIT!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on Jan 10, 2011, 01:14:54 PM
I have this fuzzy and melancholy feeling inside, guys.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 10, 2011, 02:28:33 PM
Not smelling anything really. Waiting for more concrete proof (since "Dark Continent" and all that stuff I'm seriously suspicious about anything outta the subject).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on Jan 10, 2011, 02:57:27 PM
I hope its true, but I don't want it to be f**ked up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ShadowPred on Jan 10, 2011, 02:58:05 PM
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/DenofL5/news/?a=27663 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/DenofL5/news/?a=27663)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on Jan 10, 2011, 03:00:07 PM
Quote from: ShadowPred on Jan 10, 2011, 02:58:05 PM
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/DenofL5/news/?a=27663 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/DenofL5/news/?a=27663)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMDRq2PpjkQ# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMDRq2PpjkQ#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 10, 2011, 03:00:30 PM
QuoteI smell BS...Universal is probably just trying to keep it underwraps. Para I agree it doesn't sound right that someone can just get onto there lot and mess with there board....

I want to believe this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Jan 10, 2011, 03:01:23 PM
i thought so, i would highly expect JP4 to start production under a fake name
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 10, 2011, 03:03:43 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on Jan 10, 2011, 03:01:23 PM
i thought so, i would highly expect JP4 to start production under a fake name

Yep. Johnston recently said JP4 was still going to happen too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 10, 2011, 03:36:06 PM
Peek-a-boo (http://www.aceshowbiz.com/news/view/00037812.html).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ShadowPred on Jan 10, 2011, 04:00:46 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 10, 2011, 03:36:06 PM
Peek-a-boo (http://www.aceshowbiz.com/news/view/00037812.html).

Quote from: ShadowPred on Jan 10, 2011, 02:58:05 PM
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/DenofL5/news/?a=27663 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/DenofL5/news/?a=27663)


Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 10, 2011, 07:54:03 PM
WWWWHHHHYYYY??!!  >:( >:( >:(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 10, 2011, 07:58:07 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.web2freedom.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2008%2F09%2Fno-darth_vader.jpg&hash=eb104a529ea34ee79ea88731067ea57467267bc6)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Jan 10, 2011, 08:08:26 PM
Quote"While we'd love for [it] to be true, we checked in with Universal Pictures who tell us there is no truth to this. We're not sure how that listing made it onto the board, though we would suspect it was done as a joke by someone."

Oh, that's too funny. Very cruel to the fans, but still, hilarious. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on Jan 10, 2011, 10:05:48 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 10, 2011, 07:58:07 PM
http://www.web2freedom.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/no-darth_vader.jpg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tim5nU3DwIE#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tim5nU3DwIE#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 10, 2011, 10:42:05 PM
Well that was a low blow, f**king Universal.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 10, 2011, 10:52:47 PM
Universal... I am disappoint. :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on Jan 10, 2011, 11:09:49 PM
Hadda feelin'.

Come on Universal: our lives are in your hands, and you have butter fingers?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nope on Jan 10, 2011, 11:54:24 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jan 10, 2011, 10:52:47 PM
Universal... I am disappoint. :(
That. So very, very dissapoint.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 11, 2011, 12:57:34 AM
Quote from: Sharp Sticks on Jan 10, 2011, 11:09:49 PM
Hadda feelin'.

Come on Universal: our lives are in your hands, and you have butter fingers?

They are totally unappreciated in their time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jan 11, 2011, 01:10:29 AM
No way JP4 would come out in 2012, 2013 or 2014 seems likey since Joe may want to do JP4 instend of Captain America 2 in 2013 or 2014.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jan 11, 2011, 01:30:55 AM
Quote from: Sharp Sticks on Jan 10, 2011, 11:09:49 PM
Come on Universal: our lives are in your hands, and you have butter fingers?
:laugh:

Ah, what the hell- to be honest I never had my hopes up for this. There wasn't any solid proof.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 11, 2011, 01:33:42 AM
Universal never fails to disappoint with these rumors. Tremors 5 and JP4...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jan 11, 2011, 01:39:22 AM
I hope JP4 will take place after JP3 and will not reboot the series. JP3 was hardly bad enough to reboot the series.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Jan 11, 2011, 01:41:06 AM
i dont really want a new movie.

this franchise is done with.  i love it, and i dont want anymore done to it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jan 11, 2011, 01:43:37 AM
Ian Malcolm needs to come back. I remember I was let down that he did not return for JP3.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nope on Jan 11, 2011, 01:47:13 AM
I agree.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jan 11, 2011, 01:51:08 AM
It depends if Jeff wants to return or not? Hard to believe it been nearly 10 years since JP3 came out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 11, 2011, 01:57:43 AM
I'm half and half with JP4. I want it made, but I know nothing will come close to the original. It might be fun like the sequels, but the original is an amazing movie!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jan 11, 2011, 02:00:38 AM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Jan 11, 2011, 01:41:06 AM
i dont really want a new movie.

this franchise is done with.  i love it, and i dont want anymore done to it.
I partially agree. If some good can come of it, that is better than Jurassic Park 3, bring it on-- but I have large doubts about that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jan 11, 2011, 02:26:37 AM
I have the same feelings about this as the Alien Prequel. On the one hand, I love the franchise, and it'd be great to see another good one. But on the other, there's large room for complete suckage, which would be bad.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Jan 11, 2011, 02:47:01 AM
in the alien Prequel, there is a freaking 70% chance.

we know next to nothing about the script. we only have the dubious guarantee that Ridley wont f**k up(nobody's perfect, i know), H.R. Giger on board(which unfortunately doesn't help beyond what the producers want him to do), and.... gay rape.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on Jan 11, 2011, 02:51:20 AM
Never tell me the odds.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 11, 2011, 02:54:37 AM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Jan 11, 2011, 02:47:01 AM
in the alien Prequel, there is a freaking 70% chance.

we know next to nothing about the script. we only have the dubious guarantee that Ridley wont f**k up(nobody's perfect, i know), H.R. Giger on board(which unfortunately doesn't help beyond what the producers want him to do), and.... gay rape.

I'll say this much, gay rape would certainly be a bold new direction.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on Jan 11, 2011, 02:57:56 AM
Especially for Jurassic Park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jan 11, 2011, 02:59:56 AM
So that's what Nedry's screams were... :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Jan 11, 2011, 03:01:11 AM
Dinosaurs and man, two species separated by 65 million years...


getting it on.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jan 11, 2011, 03:07:44 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U39kfgjuie4# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U39kfgjuie4#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jan 11, 2011, 03:17:47 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 11, 2011, 02:54:37 AM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Jan 11, 2011, 02:47:01 AM
in the alien Prequel, there is a freaking 70% chance.

we know next to nothing about the script. we only have the dubious guarantee that Ridley wont f**k up(nobody's perfect, i know), H.R. Giger on board(which unfortunately doesn't help beyond what the producers want him to do), and.... gay rape.

I'll say this much, gay rape would certainly be a bold new direction.
Jurassic History X
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 11, 2011, 03:52:22 AM
I was referencing the Alien Prequel, but since you guys are obviously having fun.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jan 11, 2011, 03:57:59 AM
I think a gay rape scene would be much more needed in Jurassic Park. I mean, we've already got xeno rape in Alien, so why not bring a little bit of intrusion to Jurassic Park? Some might say "they raped a trilogy".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on Jan 11, 2011, 04:00:03 AM
I blame David Koepp the Spinosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Jan 11, 2011, 04:06:44 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Jan 11, 2011, 03:57:59 AM
I think a gay rape scene would be much more needed in Jurassic Park. I mean, we've already got xeno rape in Alien, so why not bring a little bit of intrusion to Jurassic Park? Some might say "they raped a trilogy".


First they opened doors! Then they talked to each other! Now they have gay rape!

Jurassic Park IV: Deliverance
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jan 11, 2011, 04:08:39 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Jan 11, 2011, 04:06:44 AM
Jurrassic Park IV: Deliverance To The Mainland
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jan 11, 2011, 04:09:30 AM
Burt Reynolds must be in this.

He must...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 11, 2011, 04:09:50 AM
You guys are starting to worry me...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Jan 11, 2011, 04:35:14 AM
i admit Sweeper has been... influencing me lately.

but i havent went as far as i have considered doing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jan 11, 2011, 04:37:19 AM
A dino-ized version of the "20LBS OF PUSSY AND ASS!" sex toy?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Jan 11, 2011, 04:39:39 AM
yeah, i'll leave that to the hard working crew of bad dragon to do.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on Jan 11, 2011, 04:41:44 AM
Oh, and the sleazy in-jokes had crept across the forum since then like livewire voodoo, and he cried for them, cried in his sleep, alone in some coffin hotel, fingers bunched in the temperfoam as he reached for the console that wasn't there...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Jan 11, 2011, 04:46:03 AM
im a chaos agent. i hold no agenda here.

i just leave little stones for you people to find. the fearless, the strongest, the craziest, them only will met me at the candy house.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jan 11, 2011, 05:12:48 AM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Jan 11, 2011, 04:35:14 AM
i admit Sweeper has been... influencing me lately.
Seriously?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Jan 11, 2011, 07:01:23 AM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Jan 11, 2011, 04:46:03 AM
im a chaos agent
...
•Bleep Bloop•
Achievement Unlocked: Epic Coincidence 50G
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Jan 11, 2011, 02:25:33 PM
That chalkboard tidbit proves either one of two things:

A) They are filming something with the working title.
B) Somebody just lost their job.

I can picture option B in my mind right now. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iHkqgKMBDc# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iHkqgKMBDc#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Purebreedalien on Jan 11, 2011, 04:22:41 PM
Quote from: Nychus on Jan 11, 2011, 02:25:33 PM
That chalkboard tidbit proves either one of two things:

A) They are filming something with the working title.
B) Somebody just lost their job.

I can picture option B in my mind right now. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iHkqgKMBDc# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iHkqgKMBDc#)

Or maybe it's just a conspiracy and Universal really are filming Jurassic Park IV :o

:D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 11, 2011, 06:57:48 PM
"Clever girl"....

What do you think it was?? Uh?? UHH????
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 11, 2011, 09:20:12 PM
Quote from: Purebreedalien on Jan 11, 2011, 04:22:41 PM
Quote from: Nychus on Jan 11, 2011, 02:25:33 PM
That chalkboard tidbit proves either one of two things:

A) They are filming something with the working title.
B) Somebody just lost their job.

I can picture option B in my mind right now. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iHkqgKMBDc# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iHkqgKMBDc#)

Or maybe it's just a conspiracy and Universal really are filming Jurassic Park IV :o

:D

I'm not sure Universal cares enough :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 11, 2011, 10:17:32 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 11, 2011, 09:20:12 PM
Quote from: Purebreedalien on Jan 11, 2011, 04:22:41 PM
Quote from: Nychus on Jan 11, 2011, 02:25:33 PM
That chalkboard tidbit proves either one of two things:

A) They are filming something with the working title.
B) Somebody just lost their job.

I can picture option B in my mind right now. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iHkqgKMBDc# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iHkqgKMBDc#)

Or maybe it's just a conspiracy and Universal really are filming Jurassic Park IV :o

:D

I'm not sure Universal cares enough :P

They're f**king dumb if they don't. Jurassic Park is a moneymaker.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Jan 12, 2011, 07:38:11 PM
Jurassic Park trilogy on bluray...finally.

http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=5739 (http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=5739)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 12, 2011, 07:41:14 PM
Woah....Awesome news!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on Jan 12, 2011, 07:42:42 PM
Damn it, I just dropped twenty bucks on the whole trilogy on DVD last year. Figured they'd wait until the 20th anniversary...I'm kicking myself.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jan 12, 2011, 07:46:46 PM
Maybe The Blu-Ray set will give us a JP4 teaser like they did with AVP back in 2003.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on Jan 12, 2011, 07:48:05 PM
Not a chance.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Jan 12, 2011, 07:52:58 PM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Jan 12, 2011, 07:38:11 PM
Jurassic Park trilogy on bluray...finally.

http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=5739 (http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=5739)

F**k. This or Star Wars, they got me! I don't know which to choose.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nope on Jan 12, 2011, 09:30:45 PM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Jan 12, 2011, 07:38:11 PM
Jurassic Park trilogy on bluray...finally.

http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=5739 (http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=5739)
Yes! This is awesome! I wonder if they'll release them separetly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Vulhala on Jan 12, 2011, 09:43:39 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Jan 12, 2011, 07:52:58 PM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Jan 12, 2011, 07:38:11 PM
Jurassic Park trilogy on bluray...finally.

http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=5739 (http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=5739)

F**k. This or Star Wars, they got me! I don't know which to choose.

Both obviously ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Jan 12, 2011, 10:14:11 PM
Quote from: Vulhala on Jan 12, 2011, 09:43:39 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Jan 12, 2011, 07:52:58 PM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Jan 12, 2011, 07:38:11 PM
Jurassic Park trilogy on bluray...finally.

http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=5739 (http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=5739)

F**k. This or Star Wars, they got me! I don't know which to choose.

Both obviously ;)

or wait for JP4
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 12, 2011, 10:56:14 PM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Jan 12, 2011, 07:38:11 PM
Jurassic Park trilogy on bluray...finally.

http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=5739 (http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=5739)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Flaikaspoetnik.files.wordpress.com%2F2008%2F08%2F400px-p_yes_greensvg.png&hash=a7a33c7c650a8489832ba5ea970966cf54df9324)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on Jan 13, 2011, 02:27:10 AM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Jan 12, 2011, 07:38:11 PM
Jurassic Park trilogy on bluray...finally.

http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=5739 (http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=5739)
Oh god yes, oh god yes, oh god yes, oh god yes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: XenoVC on Jan 13, 2011, 03:38:49 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 11, 2011, 09:20:12 PM
Quote from: Purebreedalien on Jan 11, 2011, 04:22:41 PM
Quote from: Nychus on Jan 11, 2011, 02:25:33 PM
That chalkboard tidbit proves either one of two things:

A) They are filming something with the working title.
B) Somebody just lost their job.

I can picture option B in my mind right now. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iHkqgKMBDc# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iHkqgKMBDc#)

Or maybe it's just a conspiracy and Universal really are filming Jurassic Park IV :o

:D

I'm not sure Universal cares enough :P

Well...between a whole new series of comics, new videogame, and the release of the trilogy on Blu-Ray....

They're definitely testing the waters for something.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on Jan 13, 2011, 11:54:09 AM
It's 199 all over again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 13, 2011, 03:25:02 PM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Jan 12, 2011, 07:38:11 PM
Jurassic Park trilogy on bluray...finally.

http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=5739 (http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=5739)
f**k Yes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DJ Pu$$yface on Jan 16, 2011, 07:29:31 AM
If this does happen...

GET RID OF THE F**KIN SPINOSAURUS!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: bobby brown on Jan 16, 2011, 12:01:11 PM
I liked it. the t-rex is getting old.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on Jan 16, 2011, 12:12:41 PM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Jan 12, 2011, 07:38:11 PM
Jurassic Park trilogy on bluray...finally.

http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=5739 (http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=5739)

*crosses fingers for deleted scenes from first film*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: jhsnake999 on Jan 16, 2011, 03:12:30 PM
I hope Universal do make a fourth Jurassic Park instalment, as the Jurassic Park movies are my favourite films of all time. I'll be awaiting the day I hear news that production has began...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on Jan 16, 2011, 03:45:30 PM
Quote from: bobby brown on Jan 16, 2011, 12:01:11 PM
I liked it. the t-rex is getting old.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi241.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fff145%2Ftzombiephotos%2Fth_ghostrider6-1.gif&hash=fc199ed957a675ee7fdedcbe34a0549020d91fee)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 16, 2011, 05:14:09 PM
I say bring on some of these:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dinosaures-web.com%2Fimages%2Fdino%2FCarcharodontosaurus.jpg&hash=8d6caa00c69053b3b311fdcd391f2100f6dd5a22)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Felijahsdinoworld.files.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F07%2Fsuchomimus11.jpg&hash=a41224d4e7fda8ab13716280d3f3527bb072d7de)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jan 16, 2011, 05:56:02 PM
I always wanted to see a Baryonyx in a JP movie for a long time now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 16, 2011, 06:05:21 PM
I want more herbivores. Enough with thinking only carnivores can be dangerous.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jan 16, 2011, 06:06:26 PM
I always wanted to see a Megalosaurus in a JP movie as well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 16, 2011, 06:08:26 PM
Why? Nothing special about it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jan 16, 2011, 06:15:29 PM
Because I always liked that Dino and we need some more carnivores. What about some other other extinct reptiles like Plesiosaurus?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: jhsnake999 on Jan 16, 2011, 06:27:50 PM
I would like to see a cryolophosaurus in a Jurassic Park film. He was featured in the game Warpath Jurassic Park and so was suchomimus so I would like to see either of them in a new Jurassic Park film. I would also like to see a full sized dilophosaurs and maybe a syntarsus or a mosasaur. What about a carnotaurus as he was in The Lost World Jurassic Park game and there were several toys made for the release of the first Jurassic Park film.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.luisrey.ndtilda.co.uk%2Fjpegs%2F256col%2Fcryoloph.jpg&hash=f0850bee67d2b7804cfc0c0184ed2c1545168089)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcarlosanzures.files.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F08%2Fimgp4845.jpg%3Fw%3D600&hash=98f22c12a7445e666d9346d68ac13b80bfa82350)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwidth%3D600%2520height%3D485%5Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.hotlinecy.com%2FFossils%2Fmosasaur.JPG&hash=fdc6b0ad3ceb7eda6db1ffaf1204b8bd14fb99bb)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hotlinecy.com%2FFossils%2Fmosasaur.JPG&hash=739eea691efc3d87e9243be8218186cfa5f6ccc9)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.imaginefx.com%2Ffxpose%2Fdamir_g_martins_portfolio%2Fimages%2F84103%2Foriginal.aspx&hash=890015ffc201e38d6fed4676a7e5f2934ae5a146)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 16, 2011, 06:56:48 PM
Bring in my favorite: Protoceratops

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cmstudio.com%2Fimage%2FProtoceratops012.jpg&hash=98be5aca0d7eb5c7157f9ec38284726d7e79cfda)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on Jan 16, 2011, 06:59:48 PM
Oh, please. My velociraptor could kick your protoceratops' prehensile ass.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.webosaurs.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2009%2F08%2Fvelociraptor1giant.jpg&hash=b603da84b199dfa1b8b1b3e15a121b56dad9631b)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 16, 2011, 07:02:02 PM
I don't believe that there was a clear winner there :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 16, 2011, 07:32:25 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Jan 16, 2011, 05:56:02 PM
I always wanted to see a Baryonyx in a JP movie for a long time now.

What I posted was a suchomimus. In other words: A bigger baryonyx. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DJ Pu$$yface on Jan 16, 2011, 08:52:57 PM
Carnotaurus and Baryonyx... that would be nothing short of awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 16, 2011, 09:49:48 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jan 16, 2011, 07:32:25 PM
What I posted was a suchomimus. In other words: A bigger baryonyx. ;D
f**k YEA.
High a five Scarhunter, that right there is my favourite Dinosaur.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 16, 2011, 09:53:07 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 16, 2011, 09:49:48 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jan 16, 2011, 07:32:25 PM
What I posted was a suchomimus. In other words: A bigger baryonyx. ;D
f**k YEA.
High a five Scarhunter, that right there is my favourite Dinosaur.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ftheinternetisterrible.com%2Fwp-content%2Fthings%2Fhigh-five.jpg&hash=81f42e2f11922d9b3d275f3c2360201ebbe2818e)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sylizar on Jan 16, 2011, 11:34:09 PM
You guys love Suchomimus too!? I knew I wasn't alone.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 17, 2011, 01:51:15 AM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Jan 16, 2011, 06:15:29 PM
Because I always liked that Dino and we need some more carnivores. What about some other other extinct reptiles like Plesiosaurus?

No we don't. We need more variety in everything. Carnivores are nice, but in addition to the T.Rex and the Velociraptors, at most you can have 3. You can't get rid of the T.Rex because he's a series staple and so are the raptors. Add in one more carnivore just for flavour and we're good.

Bring in more herbivores. There's no reason to think you can't achieve action with them just because they eat plants.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 17, 2011, 02:12:59 AM
Yeah, definitely more herbivores. Maybe even my little Peotoceratops :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Jan 17, 2011, 02:46:56 PM
Thats one of the reasons I loved Lost World because its the only film of the trilogy to use herbivores in big action sequences. First when the hunters arrive and chase down a varitey of beasts in the jeeps and on bikes and then later when they are all freed by the humans in the camp and go on a rampage.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 18, 2011, 03:33:34 AM
Exactly. Even JP 3 gave us a little bit with the hadrosaurids stampeding through the field.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Jan 18, 2011, 05:19:00 AM
Isn't there going to be a reboot for this franchise in the form of a new video game?

http://kotaku.com/5558736/jurassic-park-reopens-in-surprising-video-game-form (http://kotaku.com/5558736/jurassic-park-reopens-in-surprising-video-game-form)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dachande on Jan 18, 2011, 05:25:44 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Jan 18, 2011, 05:19:00 AM
Isn't there going to be a reboot for this franchise in the form of a new video game?

http://kotaku.com/5558736/jurassic-park-reopens-in-surprising-video-game-form (http://kotaku.com/5558736/jurassic-park-reopens-in-surprising-video-game-form)

That news is like 7 months old, theres already screenshots for the game.

http://kotaku.com/5734147/first-look-at-a-jurassic-park-game-that-looks-pretty-good (http://kotaku.com/5734147/first-look-at-a-jurassic-park-game-that-looks-pretty-good)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Jan 18, 2011, 05:32:29 AM
Sorry for being slow on the news. :-[

This game kinda reminds me of that cancelled JP game:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKUfEPYvMZc# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKUfEPYvMZc#)

EDIT: This game has me pumped, about as much as a Jurassic Park 4.

http://www.gameinformer.com/games/jurassic_park/b/pc/archive/2011/01/14/an-unlikely-developer-steps-into-the-maw-of-a-troubled-license.aspx (http://www.gameinformer.com/games/jurassic_park/b/pc/archive/2011/01/14/an-unlikely-developer-steps-into-the-maw-of-a-troubled-license.aspx)

Btw, are they ever going to release a Jurassic Park set on Blu-Ray like they did for DVD?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Jan 18, 2011, 06:11:21 AM
This year.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: lozzy.94 on Jan 18, 2011, 02:27:53 PM
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=73106 (http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=73106)

what kind of a sick person would do this.  >:(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Vulhala on Jan 18, 2011, 02:32:13 PM
Haha, that's pretty funny  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Purebreedalien on Jan 18, 2011, 05:47:06 PM
Quote from: lozzy.94 on Jan 18, 2011, 02:27:53 PM
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=73106 (http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=73106)

what kind of a sick person would do this.  >:(

Wasn't this posted like five pages ago?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Jan 18, 2011, 06:03:34 PM
Quote from: Vulhala on Jan 18, 2011, 02:32:13 PM
Haha, that's pretty funny  :laugh:

You have a sick sense of humor.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jan 19, 2011, 05:19:46 AM
So do I; which I figure is better than having none.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Jan 19, 2011, 04:36:51 PM
And it is funny! I just love picturing some joker scribbling that on the chalk board for a laugh and then running off.  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jan 19, 2011, 04:57:07 PM
Maybe stumbling as he does so, occasionally checking over his shoulder for pursuers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Jan 19, 2011, 05:00:13 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Jan 19, 2011, 04:57:07 PMMaybe stumbling as he does so, occasionally checking over his shoulder for pursuers.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F_Kghfe_1Qe7s%2FSqa7eWi0yoI%2FAAAAAAAAAZ0%2FluOEUF-pleI%2Fs400%2Fmuldoon.jpg&hash=8f701b6e341087280c58bebd5163757ffbf3d5a0)

"There's something hunting him..."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 19, 2011, 05:03:04 PM
Then he realized that his action was the worst idea in the long, sad history of bad ideas.

/Malcolm
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 20, 2011, 03:29:38 AM
I'm sure you'll be there when he remembers that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Feb 22, 2011, 08:44:07 PM
Since this is a JP thread. Here is Nostalgia Critic review of Lost World: Jurassic Park.


http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/videolinks/thatguywiththeglasses/nostalgia-critic/29828-the-lost-world-jurassic-park (http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/videolinks/thatguywiththeglasses/nostalgia-critic/29828-the-lost-world-jurassic-park)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 22, 2011, 08:44:49 PM
Inb4 TJ Doc Joy-storm.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DJ Pu$$yface on Feb 22, 2011, 08:48:48 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Feb 22, 2011, 08:44:07 PM
Since this is a JP thread. Here is Nostalgia Critic review of Lost World: Jurassic Park.


http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/videolinks/thatguywiththeglasses/nostalgia-critic/29828-the-lost-world-jurassic-park (http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/videolinks/thatguywiththeglasses/nostalgia-critic/29828-the-lost-world-jurassic-park)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5g6wvIMMBjg# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5g6wvIMMBjg#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on Feb 22, 2011, 09:31:19 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 22, 2011, 08:44:49 PM
Inb4 TJ Doc Joy-storm.

:D :D :D :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Feb 22, 2011, 09:34:52 PM
Doug stopped being funny guys.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 22, 2011, 10:39:57 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Feb 22, 2011, 08:44:07 PM
Since this is a JP thread. Here is Nostalgia Critic review of Lost World: Jurassic Park.


http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/videolinks/thatguywiththeglasses/nostalgia-critic/29828-the-lost-world-jurassic-park (http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/videolinks/thatguywiththeglasses/nostalgia-critic/29828-the-lost-world-jurassic-park)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61hx4w6iA5Y#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61hx4w6iA5Y#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Feb 22, 2011, 11:02:33 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 22, 2011, 08:44:49 PM
Inb4 TJ Doc Joy-storm.

Nah, I saw it a few days ago. Tempting though.  ;D

And Doug speaks the truth. I've never really got why some people praise Goldblum's performance in this, when it's clearly his least enthusiastic performance... ever. Probably.

Malcolm's introductory yawn pretty much sums it all up. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on Feb 22, 2011, 11:08:21 PM
I love me some Lost World.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 23, 2011, 02:46:28 AM
Quote from: TJ Doc on Feb 22, 2011, 11:02:33 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 22, 2011, 08:44:49 PM
Inb4 TJ Doc Joy-storm.

Nah, I saw it a few days ago. Tempting though.  ;D

And Doug speaks the truth. I've never really got why some people praise Goldblum's performance in this, when it's clearly his least enthusiastic performance... ever. Probably.

Malcolm's introductory yawn pretty much sums it all up.

I loved TLW...if only because the dinosaur effects were heavily improved over the first film and because there were two Rexes ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Feb 23, 2011, 02:55:16 AM
Those were more or less my reasons for enjoying it too when I was younger.

Not to mention the increased body count.  :P 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Feb 23, 2011, 03:00:50 AM
I wanted to see a higher dinosaur body count. In the novel they actually used those Lindstradt rifles and took down some Velociraptors. I mean, Eddie explained how poisonous it was at the beginning of the movie, and then they never fired the damn thing. :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 23, 2011, 03:03:33 AM
Animal cruelty, how could you?!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 23, 2011, 03:08:58 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 23, 2011, 03:03:33 AM
Animal cruelty, how could you?!

They are not animals, they are genetically altered theme park attractions.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Feb 23, 2011, 03:10:42 AM
Besides, they would be dead before they even knew what hit them. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Feb 23, 2011, 03:21:00 AM
...i wanted the Barrett to obliterate the Spynnosaur's head in JP3 but that's another thing.

it always bugged me that these top hunters had stormtrooper accuracy. we saw a clear shot of a raptor IMPALED and we couldn't see a couple dropping dead in the background?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Feb 23, 2011, 03:56:41 AM
He did admit that the movie was okay. I loved the second movie since it holds a lot of nostalgia and had great Dino action. The first movie crictal speaking, but I think enjoy watching the second movie more.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Feb 23, 2011, 08:11:18 AM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Feb 23, 2011, 03:21:00 AM
...i wanted the Barrett to obliterate the Spynnosaur's head in JP3 but that's another thing.

it always bugged me that these top hunters had stormtrooper accuracy. we saw a clear shot of a raptor IMPALED and we couldn't see a couple dropping dead in the background?
When did they get a Barrett in JP3?
I don't remember one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Feb 23, 2011, 08:17:24 AM
There was a scene with the mercs f**king shit up on an abandonded air field. They were describing the weapons too I think. And it was the token black guy that brought it to the island I believe. Apparently he can't aim.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Feb 23, 2011, 08:22:33 AM
I don't remember that AT ALL.
Ugh I wish I enjoyed the movie enough to own it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Feb 23, 2011, 08:24:48 AM
I just bought the set that includes all three and a buncha special features for each.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Feb 23, 2011, 08:29:09 AM
I only own the first.
And it's just the VHS version :laugh:
I need money :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Feb 23, 2011, 08:30:20 AM
Quote from: Cap. Fitzgerald on Feb 23, 2011, 08:29:09 AM
I need money :(
She take your money?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Feb 23, 2011, 08:31:05 AM
Who?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Feb 23, 2011, 08:34:57 AM
Gold digga.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ishallsmitethee on Feb 23, 2011, 10:08:12 AM
I'd like to see something like a pack of Allosaurs. That would be f**king scary, imagine a group of ten or twelve fast, 30-foot carnivorous dinosaurs chasing people down and ripping them to shreds.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Feb 23, 2011, 10:12:06 AM
Quote from: Ishallsmitethee on Feb 23, 2011, 10:08:12 AMI'd like to see something like a pack of Allosaurs. That would be f**king scary, imagine a group of ten or twelve fast, 30-foot carnivorous dinosaurs chasing people down and ripping them to shreds.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Foi51.tinypic.com%2F259j0wg.jpg&hash=225866b9fbd85d6965236648f788ebbe28ca104d)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 23, 2011, 12:37:48 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Feb 23, 2011, 08:17:24 AM
There was a scene with the mercs f**king shit up on an abandonded air field. They were describing the weapons too I think. And it was the token black guy that brought it to the island I believe. Apparently he can't aim.

How well do you think you could aim a weapon when a 60-ft, 9-ton carnivore is charging at you and you're quivering in fear? Especially when that weapon needs to be planted on the ground to use.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Feb 23, 2011, 12:46:15 PM
Quote from: Cap. Fitzgerald on Feb 23, 2011, 08:11:18 AM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Feb 23, 2011, 03:21:00 AM
...i wanted the Barrett to obliterate the Spynnosaur's head in JP3 but that's another thing.

it always bugged me that these top hunters had stormtrooper accuracy. we saw a clear shot of a raptor IMPALED and we couldn't see a couple dropping dead in the background?
When did they get a Barrett in JP3?
I don't remember one.

AHEM.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.imfdb.org%2Fimages%2Fthumb%2F1%2F1c%2FJP3BarrettM82A2-3.jpg%2F500px-JP3BarrettM82A2-3.jpg&hash=4a48d9ed36932f4daf7f8d862d8cbfd32d0c1f83)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fthef%2A%2Aklub.files.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F12%2Fm82a2.jpg&hash=deafeee6b89e7f100ba619d65bc5de3ec68e1c18)

the M-82A2 Barrett Anti Materiel designated 'Chopper Popper' High Caliber(12.7mm/.50 Browning machinegun BMG) rifle. Presented in the movie as a 20mm autocannon, which also reminds me of...
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.strategypage.com%2Fgallery%2Fimages%2Fxm_109_1.jpg&hash=339f3fc98fcd0f9f8d1e98abc5624950342a71ed)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Feb 23, 2011, 01:49:33 PM
The "Token" Black guy didn't have the M82A2. Cooper did, and I don't blame him for not getting a hit on the Spinosaurus with it. If he did, he probably would've blown the damn things head of since it apparently shot high explosive incendiary rounds  :P I really did like that they used that rifle in the movie though, because it really reminded me of the Over the Shoulder launcher that Muldoon used in the first book.

Nash had a Mossberg 500 Cruiser that I wish had gotten a little more action before he died. All that firepower and it didn't last past maybe half an hour on the island :C
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 23, 2011, 02:18:20 PM
And only one weapon was actually used lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 23, 2011, 02:50:35 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Feb 23, 2011, 01:49:33 PM
Nash had a Mossberg 500 Cruiser that I wish had gotten a little more action before he died. All that firepower and it didn't last past maybe half an hour on the island :C

That's one of the many reasons why I disliked JP3. They're portrayed as these tough guys in the airfield and get wiped out almost as soon as they land on the island.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Feb 23, 2011, 05:01:59 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Feb 23, 2011, 02:50:35 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Feb 23, 2011, 01:49:33 PM
Nash had a Mossberg 500 Cruiser that I wish had gotten a little more action before he died. All that firepower and it didn't last past maybe half an hour on the island :C

That's one of the many reasons why I disliked JP3. They're portrayed as these tough guys in the airfield and get wiped out almost as soon as they land on the island.

That is kinda unrealistic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on Feb 23, 2011, 09:42:34 PM
Well, look at the bright side. They would run outta ammunition, EVENTUALLY...


:D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 24, 2011, 01:38:02 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Feb 23, 2011, 02:50:35 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Feb 23, 2011, 01:49:33 PM
Nash had a Mossberg 500 Cruiser that I wish had gotten a little more action before he died. All that firepower and it didn't last past maybe half an hour on the island :C

That's one of the many reasons why I disliked JP3. They're portrayed as these tough guys in the airfield and get wiped out almost as soon as they land on the island.

Why should that make you dislike it? It just shows that these guys didn't really understand what they were getting themselves into.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Feb 24, 2011, 01:41:39 AM
Yeah I remember seeing a movie just like that.  All these soliders with high tech weapons getting pwned by these monsters from another planet.  What was it called...?  Something like 'Foreigners' or something...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Prime113 on Feb 24, 2011, 01:43:36 AM
Quote from: SM on Feb 24, 2011, 01:41:39 AM
Yeah I remember seeing a movie just like that.  All these soliders with high tech weapons getting pwned by these monsters from another planet.  What was it called...?  Something like 'Foreigners' or something...

I think.... I think you're almost there, bro.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Feb 24, 2011, 01:44:00 AM
You must be thinking of Starship Troopers. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 24, 2011, 01:55:43 AM
Give the man a cigar!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Feb 24, 2011, 02:01:36 AM
Nah that's not it - though it was a lot like Starship Troopers...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: severen76 on Feb 24, 2011, 02:04:21 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 24, 2011, 01:38:02 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Feb 23, 2011, 02:50:35 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Feb 23, 2011, 01:49:33 PM
Nash had a Mossberg 500 Cruiser that I wish had gotten a little more action before he died. All that firepower and it didn't last past maybe half an hour on the island :C

That's one of the many reasons why I disliked JP3. They're portrayed as these tough guys in the airfield and get wiped out almost as soon as they land on the island.

Why should that make you dislike it? It just shows that these guys didn't really understand what they were getting themselves into.

It shows that brilliantly with Cooper. He's a quietly confident bad ass on the plane, then 5 minutes later he's running through the jungle crying, trying to get away from the spinosaurus.
Quote from: SM on Feb 24, 2011, 02:01:36 AM
Nah that's not it - though it was a lot like Starship Troopers...

Aliens.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 24, 2011, 02:56:39 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 24, 2011, 01:38:02 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Feb 23, 2011, 02:50:35 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Feb 23, 2011, 01:49:33 PM
Nash had a Mossberg 500 Cruiser that I wish had gotten a little more action before he died. All that firepower and it didn't last past maybe half an hour on the island :C

That's one of the many reasons why I disliked JP3. They're portrayed as these tough guys in the airfield and get wiped out almost as soon as they land on the island.

Why should that make you dislike it? It just shows that these guys didn't really understand what they were getting themselves into.

It would have been nice if they lived a little longer, instead of getting killed in one collective swoop. Plus, like Grant I found Macy irritating as hell.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Feb 24, 2011, 03:15:58 AM
Quote from: Remonster on Feb 23, 2011, 01:49:33 PM
Quote from: SM on Feb 24, 2011, 02:01:36 AM
Nah that's not it - though it was a lot like Starship Troopers...

Aliens.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.drarok.com%2Fuploads%2F10566-Inception-leo-simple8-8-10.jpg&hash=aa46eb56faa4547014af8b09b202fd0d0ecb7ef5)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Feb 24, 2011, 03:21:26 AM
Well, of course it was Aliens. I wasn't being serious with ST. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: severen76 on Feb 24, 2011, 05:05:08 AM
Quote from: SM on Feb 24, 2011, 03:15:58 AM
Quote from: Remonster on Feb 23, 2011, 01:49:33 PM
Quote from: SM on Feb 24, 2011, 02:01:36 AM
Nah that's not it - though it was a lot like Starship Troopers...

Aliens.
http://upload.drarok.com/uploads/10566-Inception-leo-simple8-8-10.jpg

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.iwatchstuff.com%2F2007%2F07%2F17%2FLeoDicaprio.jpg&hash=5cbe4e2f2187c5436f71d7d7b06ba0c1bfbf6a63)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on Feb 24, 2011, 05:06:43 AM
Quote from: severen76 on Feb 24, 2011, 05:05:08 AM
Quote from: SM on Feb 24, 2011, 03:15:58 AM
Quote from: Remonster on Feb 23, 2011, 01:49:33 PM
Quote from: SM on Feb 24, 2011, 02:01:36 AM
Nah that's not it - though it was a lot like Starship Troopers...

Aliens.
http://upload.drarok.com/uploads/10566-Inception-leo-simple8-8-10.jpg

http://www.iwatchstuff.com/2007/07/17/LeoDicaprio.jpg
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F_p7Ly1WlquIw%2FTOdqUoMdiBI%2FAAAAAAAACPY%2FIiwe4T0wGBM%2Fs1600%2FLeonardo-DiCaprio-Strut.jpg&hash=74739ddef4508f5040b3d0c2ac948ce1b7e5e7b1)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sso02V on Feb 24, 2011, 07:46:59 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Feb 23, 2011, 02:50:35 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Feb 23, 2011, 01:49:33 PM
Nash had a Mossberg 500 Cruiser that I wish had gotten a little more action before he died. All that firepower and it didn't last past maybe half an hour on the island :C

That's one of the many reasons why I disliked JP3. They're portrayed as these tough guys in the airfield and get wiped out almost as soon as they land on the island.
Nobody ever gets to shoot any dinosaurs. They bring a whole army of mercenaries to the island and they don't take a single dinosaur with them when they get horribly killed. Are they afraid that hippies will complain?

How much better of an ending would it have been to have the Spinosaurus charge onto the beach at the end and just get leveled by all that firepower sitting right there? Certainly beats it just up and disappearing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sylizar on Feb 24, 2011, 12:25:47 PM
I think it`s a little smarter than that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 24, 2011, 12:27:52 PM
I never understood the big ending of Jurassic Park III. Never. Y'now, an Helicopter or just a boat wasn't enough? THREE AMPHIBIAN VEHICLES? At least 20 soldiers?
Seriously?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Feb 24, 2011, 12:29:08 PM
Maybe they thought they would have to search the island for them? Better get some firepower if that's the case.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Airidok on Feb 24, 2011, 02:06:24 PM
They would never deploy ground forces on an island that big. They'd do SAR by air before risking dozens of lives for several civilians who illegally trespessed on the island and who were likely dead based on their status at the end of the call to Ellie. The movie was brain dead. Killing off the T-Rex? In the DVD special features they said their only goal was to 'out-do the other films in every way,' that should tell you everything. They weren't trying to make a good film, like the first two did, they were trying to make a movie about dinosaur fights, and anything in-between was superfluous tripe to them, as made evident by the final product. And deprecating the Ian Malcom character with that two-second reference was a cheap shot at the first two films, that is essentially supposed to tell the audience that they were idiots for liking the first two movies.

Maybe I'm extra-defensive because the first two movies defined my love of dinosaurs as a toddler/child, but JPIII was one horrible movie. Bringing Alan Grant back and changing him into a self-righteous, petty, and reluctant hero? They had him take a complete 360 from the Grant in the first movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 24, 2011, 04:06:59 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 24, 2011, 12:27:52 PM
I never understood the big ending of Jurassic Park III. Never. Y'now, an Helicopter or just a boat wasn't enough? THREE AMPHIBIAN VEHICLES? At least 20 soldiers?
Seriously?

Yeah...and they kinda just appear out of thin air as well.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Feb 24, 2011, 04:16:36 PM
"Yeah, uh, we were told there were nuclear missile silos here?"



Ellie, back on the mainland...
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.roflmayonaise.net%2Fincludes%2Fimages%2Ftrollface.png&hash=3e3b9e6b9a05316bc78742636fc00a383bc1f68b)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Feb 24, 2011, 04:33:14 PM
And then they find out about INgen's Nuclear facility and the terrorists trying to steal the material.

and then this happens:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4KLRp6QGjQ# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4KLRp6QGjQ#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Feb 24, 2011, 06:20:24 PM
Realistically, dinosaurs may die easily when faced with gunfire.  Maybe that's why they never allowed heavy guns next to the dinos.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 24, 2011, 06:27:40 PM
Muldoon grenades + Bazooka sequence in JP novel = badass.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Feb 24, 2011, 06:29:01 PM
You said it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 24, 2011, 06:50:57 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 24, 2011, 06:27:40 PM
Muldoon grenades + Bazooka sequence in JP novel = badass.

Oh yes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Feb 24, 2011, 06:52:39 PM
I really liked the part involving Grant confronting the raptors in the lab.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 24, 2011, 07:04:05 PM
Quote from: Sso02V on Feb 24, 2011, 07:46:59 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Feb 23, 2011, 02:50:35 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Feb 23, 2011, 01:49:33 PM
Nash had a Mossberg 500 Cruiser that I wish had gotten a little more action before he died. All that firepower and it didn't last past maybe half an hour on the island :C

That's one of the many reasons why I disliked JP3. They're portrayed as these tough guys in the airfield and get wiped out almost as soon as they land on the island.
Nobody ever gets to shoot any dinosaurs. They bring a whole army of mercenaries to the island and they don't take a single dinosaur with them when they get horribly killed. Are they afraid that hippies will complain?

How much better of an ending would it have been to have the Spinosaurus charge onto the beach at the end and just get leveled by all that firepower sitting right there? Certainly beats it just up and disappearing.

It's not bad, but it's too morbid for the series. Personally, and this is just the dino geek in me talking, I would have preferred an ending b/w the Rex and Spino. Instead of having them fight initially in the second act and it's over within seconds, have them stare each other down with a roaring contest then whey back away from one another as a kind of "another time" kinda deal, have them fight right at the end when Spino is wreaking havoc in the lake.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Feb 24, 2011, 08:32:14 PM
What do people here think about a Jurassic Park Chaos Effect movie?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jurassictoys.net%2Fdatabase%2Fmain.php%3Fg2_view%3Dcore.DownloadItem%26amp%3Bg2_itemId%3D676%26amp%3Bg2_serialNumber%3D2&hash=579ebae1e5b5b2b8cadf2157056faeca7c2c93ce)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TheMonolith on Feb 24, 2011, 08:33:56 PM
f**k that.
I want the Trespasser movie!
Yes. I like Trespasser. If only for the amazing level designs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Feb 24, 2011, 08:39:01 PM
Dinosaur mutants sound cool.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ftoyarchive.com%2FSTAForSale%2FNEW2001%2B%2FJurassicPark%2FChaosEffect%2FAmargospinusMOSC1a.jpg&hash=b4b280be77bbfe2a5bc4a8ba7aac69330bc6bd29)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.actiontoys.com%2FMerchant2%2Fgraphics%2F00000001%2FJPCHAOS-08.JPG&hash=72448b9f8d8444567852025ca83195076981f9f0)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fecx.images-amazon.com%2Fimages%2FI%2F41wd4HPX0ML._SL500_AA300_.jpg&hash=fc4ae0da333fc00f4d2ab6fc4705391f6bc9cbf4)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TheMonolith on Feb 24, 2011, 08:41:39 PM
TV series, maybe.
Feature length film for main cannon?
Nope. Just...nope.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Feb 24, 2011, 08:43:50 PM
You mean like that Aliens cartoon that was going to come out based on the Aliens toys from Kenner? :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TheMonolith on Feb 24, 2011, 08:44:14 PM
Yes!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 24, 2011, 08:47:55 PM
The original Jurassic Park novels depicted slightly and voluntarily distorted Dinosaurs - the compy were, for example, described to have 5 fingers that made them human-like.
But... Crichton never went that far.
No, I woudln't like a Chaos Effect film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Feb 24, 2011, 08:49:24 PM
I wonder who would win: JP Chaos Effect dinos or our Aliens?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 25, 2011, 03:53:33 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Feb 24, 2011, 08:39:01 PM
Dinosaur mutants sound cool.

http://toyarchive.com/STAForSale/NEW2001+/JurassicPark/ChaosEffect/AmargospinusMOSC1a.jpg

http://www.actiontoys.com/Merchant2/graphics/00000001/JPCHAOS-08.JPG

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41wd4HPX0ML._SL500_AA300_.jpg

Were these widely available? Never saw them before.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Feb 25, 2011, 03:59:49 AM
Yeah, they were.  But, the only place to get them now is probably on ebay or amazon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 25, 2011, 04:01:24 AM
I have a raptor from that set, and I think I remember seeing the third one that predxeno posted at an old friend's house.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Feb 25, 2011, 04:15:49 AM
I remember there was a commercial for the JP Chaos Effect toy line, but I can't find it online anywhere. :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Feb 25, 2011, 07:01:16 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 24, 2011, 08:47:55 PM
The original Jurassic Park novels depicted slightly and voluntarily distorted Dinosaurs - the compy were, for example, described to have 5 fingers that made them human-like.
But... Crichton never went that far.
No, I woudln't like a Chaos Effect film.
I swear I love the book all around more than the movie.
I feel like rereading it now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 25, 2011, 02:07:49 PM
The book was hardcore; much grittier than the film. Muldoon turning eggs into gas bombs and Hammond being eaten by Compys...wow.

What really surprised me though was how much dialogue from the book made it into the film verbatim. Don't think I've seen a book-based movie that's done the same thing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Feb 25, 2011, 02:21:53 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 25, 2011, 02:07:49 PM
The book was hardcore; much grittier than the film. Muldoon turning eggs into gas bombs and Hammond being eaten by Compys...wow.

What really surprised me though was how much dialogue from the book made it into the film verbatim. Don't think I've seen a book-based movie that's done the same thing.

Watchmen, and The Road are 2 i can think of off the top of my head.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 25, 2011, 03:53:49 PM
Oh yeah, forgot about Watchmen. Haven't seen the other film you mentioned though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Feb 25, 2011, 04:42:18 PM
I'm usually one of those guys who prefers the book over the movie, but with Jurassic park I think its the other way around. I love them both though. Instead of them being so different that one of them is inferior, they're both very well done.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Feb 25, 2011, 04:45:50 PM
The book was better than the movie in my opinion for both JP and The Lost World.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 25, 2011, 05:38:22 PM
Its been so long since I've read the books. I really need to do that again. I own the first...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Feb 25, 2011, 09:09:57 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 25, 2011, 02:07:49 PM
The book was hardcore; much grittier than the film. Muldoon turning eggs into gas bombs and Hammond being eaten by Compys...wow.

What really surprised me though was how much dialogue from the book made it into the film verbatim. Don't think I've seen a book-based movie that's done the same thing.
On top of what AvatarIII said, No Country for Old Men, Mystic River, The Eiger Sanction, and The Shining are some more I can recall doing so.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on Feb 25, 2011, 09:24:19 PM
Read the book a few years ago, and I've always liked Chrichton, but the movie is far more enjoyable as far as I'm concerned. It had all the awe and wonder the novel lacked. Really not comparable.

And I'll say nothing of The Lost World.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 25, 2011, 09:31:46 PM
The novels and films work on a dinstinctly separate kind of story-telling.
The novels are dark, gritty, and extremely scientific - and their goal is not the story alone, but the message and thought around it. One of the things I like about the Crichton Literature is that Crichton almost never looses the possibility to enter up a scientifical speculation or reflection, or even historical notes (in Congo, hiyo, they helped me with Geography). He always gets up an excuse to talk about things along these lines, and I love that. The characters in the novels are also darker, they swear a whole lot more, some are even more 'mature' (Tim can't get his eyes off the legs of Ellie Sattler, for example), and the dialogues are way longer and more in depth.
The movies work on a kind-of different plan of storytelling. They tell a classic Sci-Fi story biased on spectacle and fable, rather than exploring down to the last detail the theme they revolve around - like the novels -. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying it's a bad thing.
But I love both the novels and films - in different ways.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Feb 25, 2011, 09:38:35 PM
When it comes to Jurassic Park, I love the novel as much as the movie. They're different, but equally good. When it comes to The Lost World however, I much prefer the novel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hive Tyrant on Feb 25, 2011, 10:21:49 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Feb 25, 2011, 09:09:57 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 25, 2011, 02:07:49 PM
The book was hardcore; much grittier than the film. Muldoon turning eggs into gas bombs and Hammond being eaten by Compys...wow.

What really surprised me though was how much dialogue from the book made it into the film verbatim. Don't think I've seen a book-based movie that's done the same thing.
On top of what AvatarIII said, No Country for Old Men, Mystic River, The Eiger Sanction, and The Shining are some more I can recall doing so.

American Psycho did it too. Almost every conversation and line of dialogue is taken directly from the book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Feb 26, 2011, 06:18:08 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 25, 2011, 09:31:46 PM
The novels and films work on a dinstinctly separate kind of story-telling.
The novels are dark, gritty, and extremely scientific - and their goal is not the story alone, but the message and thought around it. One of the things I like about the Crichton Literature is that Crichton almost never looses the possibility to enter up a scientifical speculation or reflection, or even historical notes (in Congo, hiyo, they helped me with Geography). He always gets up an excuse to talk about things along these lines, and I love that. The characters in the novels are also darker, they swear a whole lot more, some are even more 'mature' (Tim can't get his eyes off the legs of Ellie Sattler, for example), and the dialogues are way longer and more in depth.
The movies work on a kind-of different plan of storytelling. They tell a classic Sci-Fi story biased on spectacle and fable, rather than exploring down to the last detail the theme they revolve around - like the novels -. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying it's a bad thing.
But I love both the novels and films - in different ways.

Sonuvabitch, I was gonna say that.

One thing with Crichton, though, is that when he wasn't careful, his message high-jacked the story and just ruined the book. Only happened once, though; State of Fear.

God, I couldn't stand that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Feb 26, 2011, 10:49:32 AM
Quote from: Shasvre on Feb 25, 2011, 09:38:35 PM
When it comes to Jurassic Park, I love the novel as much as the movie. They're different, but equally good. When it comes to The Lost World however, I much prefer the novel.

This.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Elliott on Feb 26, 2011, 09:57:41 PM
I personally love The Lost World. Jurassic Park III was hideous, though.

Jurassic Park: 10/10.
The Lost World: Jurassic Park: 9.5/10.
Jurassic Park reacharound: 6/10.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Feb 26, 2011, 10:03:54 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Feb 26, 2011, 06:18:08 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 25, 2011, 09:31:46 PM
The novels and films work on a dinstinctly separate kind of story-telling.
The novels are dark, gritty, and extremely scientific - and their goal is not the story alone, but the message and thought around it. One of the things I like about the Crichton Literature is that Crichton almost never looses the possibility to enter up a scientifical speculation or reflection, or even historical notes (in Congo, hiyo, they helped me with Geography). He always gets up an excuse to talk about things along these lines, and I love that. The characters in the novels are also darker, they swear a whole lot more, some are even more 'mature' (Tim can't get his eyes off the legs of Ellie Sattler, for example), and the dialogues are way longer and more in depth.
The movies work on a kind-of different plan of storytelling. They tell a classic Sci-Fi story biased on spectacle and fable, rather than exploring down to the last detail the theme they revolve around - like the novels -. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying it's a bad thing.
But I love both the novels and films - in different ways.

Sonuvabitch, I was gonna say that.

One thing with Crichton, though, is that when he wasn't careful, his message high-jacked the story and just ruined the book. Only happened once, though; State of Fear.

God, I couldn't stand that.

I really enjoyed State of Fear. Wasnt too keen on Next although it was a decent enough read. Never did read The Lost World although I did read Jurassic Park. Infact I think those are the only three Crichton books ive read.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Feb 26, 2011, 10:09:19 PM
Quote from: Galliruler on Feb 26, 2011, 09:57:41 PM
I personally love The Lost World. Jurassic Park III was hideous, though.

Jurassic Park: 10/10.
The Lost World: Jurassic Park: 9.5/10.
Jurassic Park reacharound: 6/10.

I second this. I thoroughly love The Lost World. JP3 was just too messy, and I found alot of it to just be kinda stupid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DJ Pu$$yface on Feb 26, 2011, 10:23:42 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Feb 26, 2011, 10:09:19 PM
Quote from: Galliruler on Feb 26, 2011, 09:57:41 PM
I personally love The Lost World. Jurassic Park III was hideous, though.

Jurassic Park: 10/10.
The Lost World: Jurassic Park: 9.5/10.
Jurassic Park reacharound: 6/10.

I second this. I thoroughly love The Lost World. JP3 was just too messy, and I found alot of it to just be kinda stupid.

Thirded.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Feb 26, 2011, 10:30:53 PM
Fourthed-ed
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Feb 26, 2011, 10:32:01 PM
Quote from: Keg on Feb 26, 2011, 10:03:54 PM
I really enjoyed State of Fear. Wasnt too keen on Next although it was a decent enough read. Never did read The Lost World although I did read Jurassic Park. Infact I think those are the only three Crichton books ive read.

The thing with State of Fear that really got me was the characters. I just felt it was incredibly stupid that this government agent was bringing a lawyer and a secretary along with him as he tried to stop terrorists. The whole thing just felt like an excuse for Crichton to bitch about how climate change isn't happening.

As for his other books, you should definitely check out Sphere. It's my favourite.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on Feb 26, 2011, 10:37:44 PM
Quote from: DJ Pu$$yface on Feb 26, 2011, 10:23:42 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Feb 26, 2011, 10:09:19 PM
Quote from: Galliruler on Feb 26, 2011, 09:57:41 PM
I personally love The Lost World. Jurassic Park III was hideous, though.

Jurassic Park: 10/10.
The Lost World: Jurassic Park: 9.5/10.
Jurassic Park reacharound: 6/10.

I second this. I thoroughly love The Lost World. JP3 was just too messy, and I found alot of it to just be kinda stupid.

Thirded.
Quote from: Keg on Feb 26, 2011, 10:30:53 PM
Fourthed-ed

Fifthed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on Feb 26, 2011, 10:38:52 PM
Quote from: Walk Evil Talk on Feb 26, 2011, 10:37:44 PM
Quote from: DJ Pu$$yface on Feb 26, 2011, 10:23:42 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Feb 26, 2011, 10:09:19 PM
Quote from: Galliruler on Feb 26, 2011, 09:57:41 PM
I personally love The Lost World. Jurassic Park III was hideous, though.

Jurassic Park: 10/10.
The Lost World: Jurassic Park: 9.5/10.
Jurassic Park reacharound: 6/10.

I second this. I thoroughly love The Lost World. JP3 was just too messy, and I found alot of it to just be kinda stupid.

Thirded.
Quote from: Keg on Feb 26, 2011, 10:30:53 PM
Fourthed-ed

Fithed.

Humbug, apart from the work of Postlethwaite and Winston.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on Feb 26, 2011, 10:50:11 PM
It may partially be a nostalgia thing for me because I missed the first JP in the cinema (parents wouldn't have it) and had such a great time when I got to go see the sequel. I still remember seeing the trailer before Liar Liar and flipping out with excitement.   
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 26, 2011, 11:38:43 PM
I agree with SpaceMarines, in that State of Fear being a low point for him. It seemed more like a personal grievance than an acutal story. Sphere was fantastic; it was such a fun ride. The conversations between Norman & Co. with Jerry are ten times better in the novel; truly chilling. Another novel I adored was Timeline. Only Crichton can make time travel seem possible and so damn convincing.

I have to find time and read Pirate Latitudes, his last novel. Crichton writing pirates sounds f**king epic. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 26, 2011, 11:56:20 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 25, 2011, 09:31:46 PM
The novels and films work on a dinstinctly separate kind of story-telling.
The novels are dark, gritty, and extremely scientific - and their goal is not the story alone, but the message and thought around it. One of the things I like about the Crichton Literature is that Crichton almost never looses the possibility to enter up a scientifical speculation or reflection, or even historical notes (in Congo, hiyo, they helped me with Geography). He always gets up an excuse to talk about things along these lines, and I love that. The characters in the novels are also darker, they swear a whole lot more, some are even more 'mature' (Tim can't get his eyes off the legs of Ellie Sattler, for example), and the dialogues are way longer and more in depth.
The movies work on a kind-of different plan of storytelling. They tell a classic Sci-Fi story biased on spectacle and fable, rather than exploring down to the last detail the theme they revolve around - like the novels -. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying it's a bad thing.
But I love both the novels and films - in different ways.

Not surprising since ever movie takes liberties with novels they may be based off of. What would you say the message behind TLW was? Never got the impression it had one akin to JP.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Feb 27, 2011, 01:21:42 AM
Quote from: Sharp Sticks on Feb 26, 2011, 10:38:52 PM
Humbug, apart from the work of Postlethwaite and Winston.

Agreed. But even then, Postlethwaite is completely wasted in the film, whilst Winston's effects never quite dazzle like they did in the first.

I mean they're still convincing enough, but there was never a shot that made me think 'Wow...'
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on Feb 27, 2011, 01:29:18 AM
Yeah. Basically any good that Winston does is unravelled by that kid 'gymnastisizing' a raptor though a window. Postlethwaite's amazing, though - the deleted scene of him at the bar is more captivating and thought-provoking than 80% of the finished film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenomrph on Feb 27, 2011, 01:39:35 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 26, 2011, 11:56:20 PM
Not surprising since ever movie takes liberties with novels they may be based off of. What would you say the message behind TLW was? Never got the impression it had one akin to JP.
Well you might notice that the protagonists really aren't the "good guys". Sure the InGen guys are shown to be doing morally questionable stuff by capturing dinosaurs (that they legally created and own) in order to move them to a stateside park (in order to save their company that's about to go bankrupt), but if you pay attention every bad decision in the entire movie is made by the protagonists.
Sarah interferes with the stegosaurus baby and it turns into amateur hour, and she almost gets herself killed. Sarah and Nick sabotage the InGen camp, which up to that point had been safe and secure, and get a bunch of hunters killed. Sarah brings the wounded baby T-Rex back to the trailer, which gets their trailer destroyed and gets Eddie killed. Sarah and Nick swap out Roland's ammo for tranquilizer darts, which leads to the T-rex not getting killed and instead running amok in California.

Compare that with all the "bad guys", who never actually hurt any of the dinosaurs and never endanger anybody (well, unless you count the deleted scene where they intentionally injure the baby T-rex).

Also I much prefer the Lost World movie to the book; in the book nothing happens, the "bad guys" never even interact with the protagonists, there's very little actual dinosaur action, and the whole book is basically just a soapbox for Crichton to use Malcolm and Levine as his mouthpiece to talk about whatever topics he felt like rambling about. There's a reason why the movie only borrows 1 scene from the book (the trailer getting trashed and going over the cliff) and that's because a movie based on the book would have been boring and would have sucked out loud.

Having said that, the book had a few things going for it - Thorne and Levine were interesting characters, and the chameleon Carnotauruses were awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Feb 27, 2011, 01:55:25 AM
Quote from: TJ Doc on Feb 27, 2011, 01:21:42 AM
Agreed. But even then, Postlethwaite is completely wasted in the film, whilst Winston's effects never quite dazzle like they did in the first.

I mean they're still convincing enough, but there was never a shot that made me think 'Wow...'

For me one shot springs automatically to mind for both JP and TLW. In JP its the T-Rex when you see its whole body for the first time after it breaks through the fence and in TLW its the T-Rex again. This time its when it appears behind the truck that the guy is trying to reverese and then the other T-Rex appears beside it. I love those two shots from both movies. There isnt a shot that springs to mind when I think of JPIII though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Feb 27, 2011, 02:04:48 AM
But weren't the full-body (CGI) shots handled by ILM?

Although if that is the case, then what about the Pteranodons? It's been a while since I watched III, but that shot of one emerging from the mist on the walkway has always stuck with me. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 27, 2011, 02:12:04 AM
Quote from: TJ Doc on Feb 27, 2011, 02:04:48 AM
But weren't the full-body (CGI) shots handled by ILM?

Although if that is the case, then what about the Pteranodons? It's been a while since I watched III, but that shot of one emerging from the mist on the walkway has always stuck with me. 

That one was cool, as was the Spino with the fire behind it.

I enjoyed JP///, but felt it was kind of rushed and choppy. I think my biggest problem with it is that the plot wasn't so much about science as it was about simply getting off the island.

I need to rewatch the trilogy, its been a while, with the exception of the first. Actually scratch that, I need to update my VHSs. When do the Blu Rays come out?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on Feb 27, 2011, 02:14:28 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Feb 27, 2011, 01:39:35 AM
Compare that with all the "bad guys", who never actually hurt any of the dinosaurs and never endanger anybody (well, unless you count the deleted scene where they intentionally injure the baby T-rex).

Actually, the scene had a drunken Ludlow tripping over the rex's leg after he's startled by the sound of another dinosaur nearby.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjurassicpark2%2Flwcut%2Fludlowrexlg.jpg&hash=a9eee9f432a9f40fee30e9657efb15ad4e3ba3c7)

I think the juvenile rex is one of the great achievements by Winston's team in the film. The way it had such complete movement with no visible wires or cables as the actors carried it around was really impresseive, eye em oh.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 27, 2011, 03:38:13 AM
In terms of "wow" moments in TLW I really enjoyed the T-Rexes/Camper/Cliff of death scene.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Feb 27, 2011, 03:50:04 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Feb 27, 2011, 01:39:35 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 26, 2011, 11:56:20 PM
Not surprising since ever movie takes liberties with novels they may be based off of. What would you say the message behind TLW was? Never got the impression it had one akin to JP.
Well you might notice that the protagonists really aren't the "good guys". Sure the InGen guys are shown to be doing morally questionable stuff by capturing dinosaurs (that they legally created and own) in order to move them to a stateside park (in order to save their company that's about to go bankrupt), but if you pay attention every bad decision in the entire movie is made by the protagonists.
Sarah interferes with the stegosaurus baby and it turns into amateur hour, and she almost gets herself killed. Sarah and Nick sabotage the InGen camp, which up to that point had been safe and secure, and get a bunch of hunters killed. Sarah brings the wounded baby T-Rex back to the trailer, which gets their trailer destroyed and gets Eddie killed. Sarah and Nick swap out Roland's ammo for tranquilizer darts, which leads to the T-rex not getting killed and instead running amok in California.

Compare that with all the "bad guys", who never actually hurt any of the dinosaurs and never endanger anybody (well, unless you count the deleted scene where they intentionally injure the baby T-rex).

Also I much prefer the Lost World movie to the book; in the book nothing happens, the "bad guys" never even interact with the protagonists, there's very little actual dinosaur action, and the whole book is basically just a soapbox for Crichton to use Malcolm and Levine as his mouthpiece to talk about whatever topics he felt like rambling about. There's a reason why the movie only borrows 1 scene from the book (the trailer getting trashed and going over the cliff) and that's because a movie based on the book would have been boring and would have sucked out loud.

Having said that, the book had a few things going for it - Thorne and Levine were interesting characters, and the chameleon Carnotauruses were awesome.

I agree that The Lost World novel was slow, but I love how horribly vicious Crichton portrayed the raptors. Even deadlier than in the first book. I think the book is pretty slow for a long while, but I found the last quarter of the book to be intense, what with so many things going on in a row. I.e, T-rexes attacking the trailers, Raptors assaulting the High Hide, Sarah and Kelly chasing a Raptor through the fields, Levine and Thorne trying to rescue Arby and getting in an insane car chase against the Raptors, then Thorne finds the Carnotaurus.

I found it ended pretty abruptly though. I liked the original ending for the movie, where they were going to have Pteranodons attacking everybody in the village.

And I gotta agree with Keg, those two shots are just so amazing. I think my favorite shot in the original movie is when Malcolm distracts the Rex so Grant can save the kids. I feel that shot sets up the size of the Tyrannosaur so well, and when It roars at Malcolm its a wonder he didn't mess himself  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Elliott on Feb 27, 2011, 03:57:53 AM
That would have been slightly anti-climactic.

RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRWWWWWWWWWWWWW

And after that all you hear is a slight pbbbbbt noise.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2011, 10:24:16 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 26, 2011, 11:56:20 PM
What would you say the message behind TLW was?
Don't force Nature into your slimy hands perhaps. As usual, the novel explores a lot more the subject.

Quote from: Xenomrph on Feb 27, 2011, 01:39:35 AM
Well you might notice that the protagonists really aren't the "good guys".
Yes they are. They don't want the Dinosaurs to get on the Continent - and that's the whole point. Their errors had a base on them - photographing the Stegosaurus was just an accident, Ingen Camp was completely intentional since they wanted to free the Dinosaurs and get them back to the environment, hardly a bad decision at all (and I don't remember 'a lot of hunters killed', that was when the T.Rex followed them down to the camp and started the chase-to-waterfall thing). The wounded Tyrannosaurus in the trailer was in the novel too - only for different reasons, and the action just wanted to show the environmentalist nature of the character; I'd not define the last one you mentioned a bad decision at all, as it was to InGen taking it to the continent. Nick didn't want the Tyrannosaurus to be killed.

Quote from: Xenomrph on Feb 27, 2011, 01:39:35 AM
(well, unless you count the deleted scene where they intentionally injure the baby T-rex).
Deleted scene that is implied in the final cut - as the Baby Tyrannosaurus is still wounded. Their purpose was to make the baby call for help - and that's the best way to inspire him to do so.

Wholeheartedly disagree on the novel as well :P - I love the film with all myself but a less-liberties-taken transposition, with the proper cuts, would've worked too. There's the Rexes-trailer-cliff as you said, but then there's the Raptor attack, the various Tyrannosaurus appearences, especially the Thorne-on-motorcycle chase, the Carnotaur attack, Dodgson's demise... there's a lot to take from. :)
But I don't say the actual film sucks because of the liberties it took - I love it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 10:46:13 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2011, 10:24:16 AMYes they are.

Then they're the worst heroes I've ever seen.

Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2011, 10:24:16 AMIngen Camp was completely intentional since they wanted to free the Dinosaurs and get them back to the environment, hardly a bad decision at all.

It was a terrible decision. First of all, they had no right to do it. InGen owned those dinosaurs, they should have the right to do as they please with them. Second, by destroying their camp they made sure the humans there were without means to contact the main land and so had to hike across the island at foot instead, thereby dooming many of them.

Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2011, 10:24:16 AMThe wounded Tyrannosaurus in the trailer was in the novel too - only for different reasons, and the action just wanted to show the environmentalist nature of the character;

But as we can see, it proved to be a stupid choice.

Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2011, 10:24:16 AMI'd not define the last one you mentioned a bad decision at all, as it was to InGen taking it to the continent. Nick didn't want the Tyrannosaurus to be killed.

Nick had no idea when Roland needed to use that gun or against what. He was more or less trying to kill him by destroying the man's means of defending himself. Hell, if it hadn't been for Nick, Roland would have just killed the T-Rex and that would have been it. They wouldn't have had a chance to take it to the main land if that would have happened.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2011, 11:05:49 AM
Quote from: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 10:46:13 AM
It was a terrible decision. First of all, they had no right to do it. InGen owned those dinosaurs, they should have the right to do as they please with them.
But it was the point of the film! That they were there to mantain John Hammond's true decisions about the Island, and help to not accomplish what Ludlow was trying to achieve, despite the fact that he was 'legally right'.

Quote from: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 10:46:13 AM
But as we can see, it proved to be a stupid choice.
It wasn't without discussion, too. Sarah tries to convince Nick, you know - and Ian was terribly in disagreement with that. They sorta knew that Mommy would be very angry.

Quote from: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 10:46:13 AM
He was more or less trying to kill him by destroying the man's means of defending himself.
Always thought he wanted the animals not to be hurt.

Quote from: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 10:46:13 AM
They wouldn't have had a chance to take it to the main land if that would have happened.
Would've taken Mommy. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 11:16:26 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2011, 11:05:49 AMBut it was the point of the film! That they were there to mantain John Hammond's true decisions about the Island, and help to not accomplish what Ludlow was trying to achieve, despite the fact that he was 'legally right'.

Perhaps, but it isn't a point I agree with. I think Ludlow was morally right as well.

Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2011, 11:05:49 AMAlways thought he wanted the animals not to be hurt.

Yeah, that was probably what he was thinking too. But seeing as how they are on an island filled with dangerous carnivores, perhaps he should have considered the consequences of his actions.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2011, 12:06:50 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 11:16:26 AM
Perhaps, but it isn't a point I agree with. I think Ludlow was morally right as well.
As shown in the climax of the film, I'd think maybe. :P

Quote from: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 11:16:26 AM
Yeah, that was probably what he was thinking too. But seeing as how they are on an island filled with dangerous carnivores, perhaps he should have considered the consequences of his actions.
He didn't really care for Roland, you know. All he cared for were the animals. He's the 'love him and hate him' kind of character. Roland's badasseness assured him survival though. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Feb 27, 2011, 01:10:03 PM
Quote from: TJ Doc on Feb 27, 2011, 02:04:48 AM
But weren't the full-body (CGI) shots handled by ILM?

Although if that is the case, then what about the Pteranodons? It's been a while since I watched III, but that shot of one emerging from the mist on the walkway has always stuck with me.

Ah sorry I forgot you were talking about Winstons practical effects and not the SFX as a whole. Yeah both those shots i referred to where CGI of course.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 03:22:57 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2011, 12:06:50 PMAs shown in the climax of the film, I'd think maybe. :P

No reason that bringing dinosaurs to the main land had to end in a disaster like that, unless the movie called for it.

Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2011, 12:06:50 PMHe didn't really care for Roland, you know. All he cared for were the animals. He's the 'love him and hate him' kind of character. Roland's badasseness assured him survival though. 8)

Nah, I just hate him. He put the life of some freaking dinosaurs above his own life and the rest of the group. The guy deserved to be eaten. Besides, what would have happened if Roland came face to face with a Raptor for example and needed to shot that, only to find out the bullets were gone? He would have been dead in seconds. It was pure luck that he found out when he did and was able to pick up the other gun instead.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 27, 2011, 05:24:19 PM
Ludlow was the John Hammond type character of TLW, except he was more radical in his beliefs, where as when John knew to let his park fall in order to survive Ludlow is determined not to fail no matter the consequence. His team and InGen were a liability. The scene when Ludlow is talking to Roland, and Roland brings up Ajay's death Ludlow isn't too concerned. He's more interested in the Rex.

I found him to be a bit of a twerp and a snake.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 05:33:05 PM
Aye, he was a dick, but none of the shit that happened was really his fault. Heck, even the T-Rex on the boat wouldn't have been a problem were it not for the Raptors killing the crew.

Come to think of it, did Ian and Sarah let him die at the end? I don't remember if they knew he was going down to the T-Rex baby at the end. If they knew, they could have at least warned him that daddy wasn't far away. :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Feb 27, 2011, 06:01:05 PM
Wait, was it confirmed that Raptors killed the crew? Thats a part of the ending segment that I thought was poorly done.

And its really not Ian or Sarah's fault that Ludlow was killed. If you see two people jumping off a huge boat while a pissed off Mama Rex is on the lose, you probably shouldn't get too close to its baby. At that point, Ludlow wasn't thinking, he just wanted the infant. Also, he had told those people to just shoot the female dead, so maybe he just figured he was safe.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 06:09:34 PM
Don't know if it actually was filmed, but that's the explanation I've heard.

Didn't say it was their fault, would have been nice of them to warn him though. So they didn't kill him, but they let him die.

What a bunch of heroes. ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Feb 27, 2011, 06:19:07 PM
Oh, I didn't mean to imply you said that. I agree though, the protagonists aren't really heroes at all. One of the reasons I love Grant. He really puts other peoples safety before his, especially Ellie and the Kids. Sure, he's a bit grumpy during the first half of JP3, but during the second half he's risking his life for other people again. Like during the Aviary sequence and when the Spinosaur attacks the boat.

Man, the more I think about it the more annoyed I get with JP3. It really had some awesome ideas, like the two I mentioned before and getting chased by Raptors through the stampede. But everything just felt poorly executed to me. For every good idea, there were two stupid pointless ones.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 27, 2011, 06:25:38 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 06:09:34 PM
What a bunch of heroes. ::)

Yeah...and what would you call all those folks who left Cooper on the runway to die? That was real heroic of them.  ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 06:27:03 PM
Did I ever call them heroes? Besides, they didn't actually have a chance to stop the plane when he came running out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 27, 2011, 06:29:27 PM
No, you didn't call them heroes. I am just making the point that the term "heroes" isn't so easily defined. Both movies had the characters making often questionable decisions.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 06:33:35 PM
For some it is. Grant for example, he was a hero.

If we had seen TLW from the hunters perspective, Nick would clearly have been a villain.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on Feb 27, 2011, 06:36:53 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 06:33:35 PM
If we had seen TLW from the hunters perspective, Nick would clearly have been a villain.

And we really should have seen it from that perspective. All the likeable characters were on the second team. I'll say it once, I'll say it a thousand times, give us Moby Dick with a T-Rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2011, 06:49:14 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 03:22:57 PMNo reason that bringing dinosaurs to the main land had to end in a disaster like that, unless the movie called for it.
It's the point of both Jurassic Park films. You can't chain life to your will. Life will find a way is a phrase present in both films - and not in case. What happened in Jurassic Park, in a way or the other, would've happened in the San Diego park, scaled to a city and potentially the nearby ones.

Quote from: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 03:22:57 PM
Nah, I just hate him. He put the life of some freaking dinosaurs above his own life and the rest of the group.
A lot of Environmentalists are like that.

Quote from: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 03:22:57 PM
Besides, what would have happened if Roland came face to face with a Raptor for example and needed to shot that, only to find out the bullets were gone? He would have been dead in seconds. It was pure luck that he found out when he did and was able to pick up the other gun instead.
That's the reason Script immunity exists. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 06:55:21 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2011, 06:49:14 PMIt's the point of both Jurassic Park films. You can't chain life to your will. Life will find a way is a phrase present in both films - and not in case. What happened in Jurassic Park, in a way or the other, would've happened in the San Diego park, scaled to a city and potentially the nearby ones.

What happened in Jurassic Park was mostly thanks to Nedry's sabotage. There's no reason a Dino Zoo couldn't work. You just need proper security.

Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2011, 06:49:14 PMA lot of Environmentalists are like that.

Sad, but true.

Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2011, 06:49:14 PMThat's the reason Script immunity exists. :P

Yeah, but that's not something Nick was aware of.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenodog on Feb 27, 2011, 06:58:45 PM
Quote from: Sharp Sticks on Feb 27, 2011, 06:36:53 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 06:33:35 PM
If we had seen TLW from the hunters perspective, Nick would clearly have been a villain.

And we really should have seen it from that perspective. All the likeable characters were on the second team. I'll say it once, I'll say it a thousand times, give us Moby Dick with a T-Rex.

Not to mention them emptying Roland's gun, which could have got him killed!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2011, 07:00:30 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 06:55:21 PM
What happened in Jurassic Park was mostly thanks to Nedry's sabotage. There's no reason a Dino Zoo couldn't work. You just need proper security.
Again, Life will find a way. It's the point of the films! :P

Quote from: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 06:55:21 PM
Yeah, but that's not something Nick was aware of.
Of course. He has done questionable things, yes, but no one regarded him as a balls-out hero. When he is revealed to be the criminal-environmentalist thing, you know what he's up to.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 07:05:49 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2011, 07:00:30 PMAgain, Life will find a way. It's the point of the films! :P

I know it is, but I don't agree with it. Normal zoo's work fine without the lions running around and killing everyone. Sure, accidents happen sometimes, but for the most part if works fine.

Malcolm were right about some parts, like the animals breeding. But that doesn't have to be a problem, as long as you're aware of it. And in a normal zoo, it's much easier to keep track of things.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2011, 07:12:06 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 07:05:49 PM
I know it is, but I don't agree with it.
Ian Malcolm is disappoint.

Quote from: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 07:05:49 PM
Normal zoo's work fine without the lions running around and killing everyone. Sure, accidents happen sometimes, but for the most part if works fine.
A Tyrannosaurus is five times a Lion in size and potentially ten times in danger it could cause. It's a freight train crossed with a mincer. You ain't stopping a Tyrannosaurus, or any other carnivorous Dinosaur that is approximately a Tyrannosaurus' size, like you do with a Lion.

Quote from: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 07:05:49 PM
Malcolm were right about some parts, like the animals breeding. But that doesn't have to be a problem, as long as you're aware of it. And in a normal zoo, it's much easier to keep track of things.
'Breeding' is just one of the ways Life can find. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 27, 2011, 07:14:04 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 07:05:49 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2011, 07:00:30 PMAgain, Life will find a way. It's the point of the films! :P

I know it is, but I don't agree with it. Normal zoo's work fine without the lions running around and killing everyone. Sure, accidents happen sometimes, but for the most part if works fine.

Dinos are incredibly different. Look at all the security in the beginning of JP and that guy still got killed raising the gate.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 07:16:07 PM
That's why they shouldn't have the biggest or most vicious dinosaurs on the zoo. Yeah, I know that a T-Rex would bring a lot of people, but if they can't handle it, they shouldn't have it at all.

Real Velociraptors wouldn't be much of a problem, they're pretty small.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2011, 07:20:00 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 07:16:07 PM
That's why they shouldn't have the biggest or most vicious dinosaurs on the zoo.
And that's precisely what InGen was bringing in the San Diego park! A full grown Tyrannosaurus male. It breaking loose from the Park would've ended out practically like the Climax of the film.

Quote from: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 07:16:07 PM
Real Velociraptors wouldn't be much of a problem, they're pretty small.
The Jurassic Park Velociraptors are not really Velociraptors though. They are Deinonychus. At the time the novel was written, Deinonychus was still included in the Velociraptor genre, so in the book, instead of 'Deinonychus Antirrhopus', you have 'Velociraptor Antirrhopus'. Spielberg kept 'Velociraptor' because it sounded more vicious.
And Deinonychus ain't a Velociraptor. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 07:24:05 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2011, 07:20:00 PMAnd that's precisely what InGen was bringing in the San Diego park! A full grown Tyrannosaurus male.

And I never said that would have worked out well either. I'm just saying that a Dino Zoo could work. Just have to be careful with what you have there, and have enough security and firepower to take it down if it escapes. Another thing Hammond messed up, by not allowing Muldoon proper weapons.

Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2011, 07:20:00 PMThe Jurassic Park Velociraptors are not really Velociraptors though. They are Deinonychus. At the time the novel was written, Deinonychus was still included in the Velociraptor genre, so in the book, instead of 'Deinonychus Antirrhopus', you have 'Velociraptor Antirrhopus'. Spielberg kept 'Velociraptor' because it sounded more vicious.
And Deinonychus ain't a Velociraptor. :P

Didn't know this. Thanks for the info. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2011, 07:47:43 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 07:24:05 PM
And I never said that would have worked out well either.
So Ludlow wasn't all-kinds of right. :P

Quote from: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 07:24:05 PM
I'm just saying that a Dino Zoo could work. Just have to be careful with what you have there, and have enough security and firepower to take it down if it escapes. Another thing Hammond messed up, by not allowing Muldoon proper weapons.
Something like that would never happen - there's always something, something that is missed in the equation, something that makes the equation fall. It's very well exemplified in the Jurassic Park novel.
Besides, the whole concept of 'I has Dinosaur, if it escapes, head blown off' is also one thing the films and novel would condemn.

Quote from: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 07:24:05 PM
Didn't know this. Thanks for the info. :)
Oh, nothing. In the novel there's also a dintinction between 'Velociraptor Antirrhopus' (the Deinonychus) and 'Velociraptor Mongoliensis' (the 'true' Velociraptor). Latter's the one they find in the nursery, that jumps on Timmy's shoulder.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 08:00:38 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2011, 07:47:43 PMSo Ludlow wasn't all-kinds of right. :P

I would still say he was legally and morally right. Doesn't mean he executed his ideas in a very smart way though.

Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2011, 07:47:43 PMSomething like that would never happen - there's always something, something that is missed in the equation, something that makes the equation fall. It's very well exemplified in the Jurassic Park novel.

Not every mistake have to lead to a disaster. Of course there would be mistakes made, but that happens in regular zoos as well.

Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2011, 07:47:43 PMBesides, the whole concept of 'I has Dinosaur, if it escapes, head blown off' is also one thing the films and novel would condemn.

Muldoon used some heavy stuff in the book against the T-Rex. It put it to sleep, but didn't kill it. They could always use something like that, and only kill if absolutely necessary.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2011, 08:10:29 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 08:00:38 PM
I would still say he was legally and morally right. Doesn't mean he executed his ideas in a very smart way though.
...And that's why the Hammond guys were there.

Quote from: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 08:00:38 PM
Not every mistake have to lead to a disaster. Of course there would be mistakes made, but that happens in regular zoos as well.
Yeah, but one of the points the films and novels make is that a 'Jurassic Park' wouldn't be a regular zoo at all.

Regarding your last point yeah, but anyone would kill an animal after it has had a meal over some people.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 08:15:00 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2011, 08:10:29 PM...And that's why the Hammond guys were there.

To make a even bigger mess out of things? The InGen team did pretty well for themselves until then.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2011, 08:15:39 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Feb 27, 2011, 08:15:00 PM
To make a even bigger mess out of things?
No, to hold the Dinosaurs in the Island. Failed at it, but it was InGen that at the point made checkmate.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Feb 27, 2011, 08:21:07 PM
The park failed because of hubris. Hammond, Arnold and everybody working on Jurassic Park felt that the park was just too big and expensive to fail. Muldoon was smart enough to say the raptors and dangerous dinosaurs should be left out of the park, but of course Hammond insisted they have the big money drawers.

And obviously Malcolm claimed that there was just too much going on in this theme park for anyone to predict what could happen, other than shit hitting the fan eventually. No one could predict that Nedry would sabotage the park systems, effectively allowing the dinosaurs to escape. Everything that went wrong on Jurassic Park was human error, simple as that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on Feb 28, 2011, 12:57:03 AM
Quote
Not every mistake have to lead to a disaster. Of course there would be mistakes made, but that happens in regular zoos as well.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUhXDkL4NTk# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUhXDkL4NTk#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenomrph on Feb 28, 2011, 03:22:05 AM
My point was that every death that happens in 'The Lost World' is the result of a bad decision on the part of the protagonists, which is true. The InGen guys had their camp under control, sabotaging it forces the camp to move and they get attacked by all sorts of dinosaurs on their way to radio for help. Trying to help the baby T-rex was a bad idea, and it gets Eddie killed. Sabotaging Roland's hunting mission was a bad idea, and results in a T-rex loose on the mainland.
Seriously if Sarah and Nick hadn't been on the island, not a single thing would have gone wrong as far as we could see ("life finding a way" aside).

As for a dino zoo actually working, that's pretty much the premise for my Jurassic Park IV plot idea. :p
Well, the park does work, for a while, and then... life finds a way.
The "chaos theory" thing wasn't really played very well in the first movie (or at least not as well as the book). Nedry sabotages the park and the dinosaurs get loose, it's really what you'd expect. The only really unexpected thing that happens is the raptors breeding. Like, Nedry switched off all the fences, so the dinosaurs getting loose was pretty inevitable. In my JP4 idea, it's a bit more of a "small actions snowball into big consequences" idea.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 28, 2011, 03:58:04 AM
Quote from: Remonster on Feb 27, 2011, 08:21:07 PM
The park failed because of hubris. Hammond, Arnold and everybody working on Jurassic Park felt that the park was just too big and expensive to fail. Muldoon was smart enough to say the raptors and dangerous dinosaurs should be left out of the park, but of course Hammond insisted they have the big money drawers.

And obviously Malcolm claimed that there was just too much going on in this theme park for anyone to predict what could happen, other than shit hitting the fan eventually. No one could predict that Nedry would sabotage the park systems, effectively allowing the dinosaurs to escape. Everything that went wrong on Jurassic Park was human error, simple as that.

The main reason the park wouldn't work is environmental design. The book raises this point very well in the later chapters when Malcolm explains why the park is a flawed concept. You're raising animals to live in an environment that is totally foreign and alien to them that they cannot adjust to for the simple reason that the physical landscape has changed. The food is different, the atmosphere is different, a whole bunch of things. It's not just that the animals themselves are dangerous, but they wouldn't even be able to breathe.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenomrph on Feb 28, 2011, 04:50:53 AM
You can handwave that away with "genetically modified". They weren't pure DNA strains or anything.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SiL on Feb 28, 2011, 06:26:30 AM
Most of that stuff can be covered with the good ole frog DNA baloney.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 28, 2011, 07:43:09 PM
That was such a dumb angle. If you're using the DNA of another animal, then the animal you're breeding for in the end should have some characteristics of the other's DNA.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenomrph on Mar 01, 2011, 07:06:42 AM
And they did - that's why the raptors in the first movie were able to breed even though they started out all-female.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Mar 01, 2011, 10:45:14 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 28, 2011, 07:43:09 PM
That was such a dumb angle. If you're using the DNA of another animal, then the animal you're breeding for in the end should have some characteristics of the other's DNA.

i dunno, all life on earth shares a huge amount of DNA, humans and banana's share about 50% apparently, the amount of DNA that actually does stuff is only a tiny fraction of our entire DNA code, most of the rest is just random junk or stuff that's been turned off. and if the frog DNA they used was mostly that stuff, just there to pad the chromosomes out basically, the kind of characteristics that they inherited from frogs should have been practically nothing, if the scientists who made the DNA knew what they were doing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Mar 01, 2011, 02:40:00 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 28, 2011, 07:43:09 PM
That was such a dumb angle. If you're using the DNA of another animal, then the animal you're breeding for in the end should have some characteristics of the other's DNA.
I do believe this is how Chet's final design came to be.
Quote from: AvatarIII on Mar 01, 2011, 10:45:14 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 28, 2011, 07:43:09 PM
That was such a dumb angle. If you're using the DNA of another animal, then the animal you're breeding for in the end should have some characteristics of the other's DNA.

i dunno, all life on earth shares a huge amount of DNA, humans and banana's share about 50% apparently, the amount of DNA that actually does stuff is only a tiny fraction of our entire DNA code, most of the rest is just random junk or stuff that's been turned off. and if the frog DNA they used was mostly that stuff, just there to pad the chromosomes out basically, the kind of characteristics that they inherited from frogs should have been practically nothing, if the scientists who made the DNA knew what they were doing.
Exactly. Thank you Avatar III.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on Apr 02, 2011, 05:50:57 AM
http://www.dailyseagull.com/movie-reviews-from-the-future-jurassic-park-4-summer-2010/ (http://www.dailyseagull.com/movie-reviews-from-the-future-jurassic-park-4-summer-2010/)

Just posted this up for the lulz. This article is so retardedly hilarious that I nearly died laughing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 05, 2011, 07:02:25 PM
lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on Apr 05, 2011, 08:59:34 PM
Quote from: Gate on Apr 02, 2011, 05:50:57 AM
http://www.dailyseagull.com/movie-reviews-from-the-future-jurassic-park-4-summer-2010/ (http://www.dailyseagull.com/movie-reviews-from-the-future-jurassic-park-4-summer-2010/)

Just posted this up for the lulz. This article is so retardedly hilarious that I nearly died laughing.

What the Hell?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Apr 05, 2011, 09:34:59 PM
Since Captain America is finish now, could we see JP4 get made for once now?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightlord on Apr 05, 2011, 09:43:51 PM
QuoteOver the past 15 years, Nedry has been producing dinosaurs, and upgrading them to make them even more destructive.  Velociraptors will now carry machine guns, Tyrannosaurus Rex's will have bazookas, and Brontosaurus' will shoot grenades out of their necks.  There's even a brand new dinosaur called the Terroristosaurus
:laugh: well that explains the can anyway lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 06, 2011, 02:43:26 AM
And Ankylosaurs will become actual tanks and fire bombs from their tails. He forgot that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Apr 06, 2011, 09:05:48 AM
The people at Universal better get the stick out of their asses and start working on JP4. Hell, even Joe Johnston recently said he'd be interested in directing it after he was done with Captain America.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 06, 2011, 11:20:16 PM
I'm not sure they care at this point. If they really believed there was money in it, they'd have done something by now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Apr 06, 2011, 11:25:00 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Apr 06, 2011, 09:05:48 AM
The people at Universal better get the stick out of their asses and start working on JP4. Hell, even Joe Johnston recently said he'd be interested in directing it after he was done with Captain America.

He might want to direct CA2 next though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Apr 07, 2011, 10:02:56 AM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Apr 06, 2011, 11:25:00 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Apr 06, 2011, 09:05:48 AM
The people at Universal better get the stick out of their asses and start working on JP4. Hell, even Joe Johnston recently said he'd be interested in directing it after he was done with Captain America.

He might want to direct CA2 next though.

he won't go right into CA2 now, whilst the Avengers is being made, there won't be a CA2 for a while yet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Apr 07, 2011, 05:18:11 PM
The screenplay for Captain America 2 is set to be written soon depending how well the movie does at the box office.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: jimmylace on Apr 08, 2011, 10:20:58 PM
...as long as it's not Spielbergs crazy "Teenage Mutant Ninja Dinos" idea. Genetically engineered crime-fighting dinosaurs is too much of a departure from the first three. The official script review is out there somewhere if you don't believe me...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 09, 2011, 01:32:56 AM
Pretty sure that idea was scrapped.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: cloverfan98 on May 01, 2011, 02:17:10 AM
Quote from: jimmylace on Apr 08, 2011, 10:20:58 PM
...as long as it's not Spielbergs crazy "Teenage Mutant Ninja Dinos" idea. Genetically engineered crime-fighting dinosaurs is too much of a departure from the first three. The official script review is out there somewhere if you don't believe me...

Link please. Also my eyes are bleeding from reading this idea.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 01, 2011, 09:00:23 AM
It wasn't anywhere near Spielberg's idea. It was a fake published as a rumor around 2004 I think.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on May 01, 2011, 12:00:05 PM
That rumor and that script has being doing the rounds for 6 or 7 years and its utter horseshit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on May 01, 2011, 01:04:24 PM
Oh well, this movie will likely never happen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on May 01, 2011, 01:27:50 PM
Why not? Were getting sequels to films with 20, even 30 year gaps between them. Who the hell would have thought Tron:Legacy would happen?

Just because there doesnt appear to be any real plan to go ahead at the minute doesnt mean there never will be.

Look at The Chronicles Of Riddick. I never ever thought we'd get a sequel to that and now its looking nailed on.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: severen76 on May 01, 2011, 01:53:33 PM
I thought they scrapped all the ideas for a sequel when Michael Crichton died.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on May 01, 2011, 01:54:39 PM
Quote from: severen76 on May 01, 2011, 01:53:33 PM
I thought they scrapped all the ideas for a sequel when Michael Crichton died.

That's what I thought as well. Also when Stan Winston died.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 01, 2011, 04:42:33 PM
Quote from: Ghost Rider on May 01, 2011, 01:54:39 PM
Quote from: severen76 on May 01, 2011, 01:53:33 PM
I thought they scrapped all the ideas for a sequel when Michael Crichton died.

That's what I thought as well. Also when Stan Winston died.

But then Johnston said last summer that JP4 wasn't scrapped at all. Just frozen for now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on May 01, 2011, 06:00:16 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on May 01, 2011, 04:42:33 PM
Quote from: Ghost Rider on May 01, 2011, 01:54:39 PM
Quote from: severen76 on May 01, 2011, 01:53:33 PM
I thought they scrapped all the ideas for a sequel when Michael Crichton died.

That's what I thought as well. Also when Stan Winston died.

But then Johnston said last summer that JP4 wasn't scrapped at all. Just frozen for now.

We'll see I suppose.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on May 01, 2011, 06:19:11 PM
He has a choice to do this or CA2. I would not be surprise if he ends up doing Captain America 2 instead.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 01, 2011, 11:32:33 PM
Fine by me. I wouldn't want him near a JP movie after the failure that was JP III.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on May 02, 2011, 01:46:59 AM
Amen to that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on May 02, 2011, 01:58:09 AM
What if he does good with Captain America? Surely he can grow as a director, and Cap looks great.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on May 02, 2011, 02:41:41 AM
To blame JPIII's downfalls purely on Joe Johnston is a bit unfair. As a director he was more than capable and delivered a good film with good performances. It was the story itself that sucked. Its not like he wrote it, and Spielberg was still producing so they all should have seen that it was a piss poor story but they didnt. As a director I have no qualms with the guy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 02, 2011, 04:58:20 AM
He directed it, ergo he was calling the shots. Yes, I can blame him for it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Fujimaster on May 02, 2011, 09:14:58 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.polyvore.com%2Fcgi%2Fimg-set%2FBQcDAAAAAwoDanBnAAAABC5vdXQKFmhwaW5YNzltM3hHMTRheGNrOVlYUkEAAAACaWQKAXgAAAAEc2l6ZQ.jpg&hash=0bad88c9d454a52372c9dd6fc6106cb360f4aa32)

and here I was thinking this shit was for real.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 02, 2011, 11:24:59 AM
Quote from: Keg on May 02, 2011, 02:41:41 AM
To blame JPIII's downfalls purely on Joe Johnston is a bit unfair. As a director he was more than capable and delivered a good film with good performances. It was the story itself that sucked. Its not like he wrote it, and Spielberg was still producing so they all should have seen that it was a piss poor story but they didnt. As a director I have no qualms with the guy.

I totally agree.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on May 02, 2011, 11:49:43 AM
Watched Jurassic Park 3 again a few days ago. It's a decent movie, but there's plenty of things that bring it down a few points. For example:

The dream Alan has about the raptor.

The little Rambo kid.

The neck snaps (by the Spinosaurus and Raptors).

The "drama" between the married couple.

The humor was pretty bad.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on May 02, 2011, 12:30:43 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on May 02, 2011, 11:24:59 AM
Quote from: Keg on May 02, 2011, 02:41:41 AM
To blame JPIII's downfalls purely on Joe Johnston is a bit unfair. As a director he was more than capable and delivered a good film with good performances. It was the story itself that sucked. Its not like he wrote it, and Spielberg was still producing so they all should have seen that it was a piss poor story but they didnt. As a director I have no qualms with the guy.

I totally agree.
as do i
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 02, 2011, 01:31:24 PM
Totally.
And Jonston made JPIII better than it could've been based on the story alone.
The reveal of the Pteranodon is one of the best scenes in the series, and I also really like the first encounter with the Raptor in the laboratory. There's plenty of other great scenes too.
Downsides of Jurassic Park III for me, essentially, are --
-The forced 'new king' of the Island, I'm no Fanboy who whines over that, but I felt it was forced, and how the Spinosaurs kills the T.Rex is just... I dunno, too human for an animal like that? The Spinosaurus feels way too territorial too;
-The wonky premise of the storyline, could've got that off better;
-(minor) great discontinuity in the representation of Isla Sorna;
-The absurdly superficial and far-fetched ending with the soldiers and all that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on May 02, 2011, 01:37:07 PM
Johnston is clearly a good director and i'd happily have him back for a sequel if the story is alot better. Nobody would question Spielbergs credentials but Kingdom of the Crystal Skull was still a stinker at times. Doesnt make him a bad director. Its too easy to blame the director all the time and I think in this case the director wasnt solely at fault. I thought he did a great job with what he had and directing wise he did an excellent job. Its just a shame the story and the ending was so disapointing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 02, 2011, 01:42:28 PM
Yeah, the guy directed Jumanji and Honey, I shrunk the kids!, I also thought The Wolfman remake was a pretty good film.
Jurassic Park III is not some kind of disaster or complete failure, either. It just has some weak points.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 02, 2011, 01:45:16 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 02, 2011, 01:42:28 PM
Yeah, the guy directed Jumanji and Honey, I shrunk the kids!, I also thought The Wolfman remake was a pretty good film.
Jurassic Park III is not some kind of disaster or complete failure, either. It just has some weak points.

You, sir, deserve a medal.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on May 02, 2011, 01:56:58 PM
Johnston isn't a bad director, but I just don't think his movie 'fits' stylistically following the first two. A lot of the key elements are there, but the lighter atmosphere and horrible pacing hurt it a lot.

The performances brought it down as well, IMO. Sam Neill and Alessandro Nivola did okay. William H. Macy phoned it in, Tea Leoni was irritating, Trevor Morgan was even more irritating, and the mercenaries didn't really have room to be, well, anything. Laura Dern's cameo was a nice touch, though she came across a bit bland as well.

The absence of John Williams didn't help, either.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on May 02, 2011, 03:24:25 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on May 02, 2011, 11:49:43 AM
Watched Jurassic Park 3 again a few days ago. It's a decent movie, but there's plenty of things that bring it down a few points. For example:

The dream Alan has about the raptor.

The little Rambo kid.

The neck snaps (by the Spinosaurus and Raptors).

The "drama" between the married couple.

The humor was pretty bad.

You forgot that piece of s**t Spinosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on May 02, 2011, 06:32:25 PM
I liked the Spinosaurus. Sure, the T-Rex is the king, but Spino is cool.

Protoceratops is still the best, though ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on May 02, 2011, 08:14:31 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 02, 2011, 01:31:24 PM
Downsides of Jurassic Park III for me, essentially, are --

-The forced 'new king' of the Island, I'm no Fanboy who whines over that, but I felt it was forced, and how the Spinosaurs kills the T.Rex is just... I dunno, too human for an animal like that? The Spinosaurus feels way too territorial too;

-The absurdly superficial and far-fetched ending with the soldiers and all that.

bingo
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on May 02, 2011, 08:15:25 PM
One word for you silly geese:

Spoiler
ALAN
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Le Celticant on May 02, 2011, 08:19:51 PM
Quote from: Keg on May 02, 2011, 01:37:07 PM
Johnston is clearly a good director and i'd happily have him back for a sequel if the story is alot better. Nobody would question Spielbergs credentials but Kingdom of the Crystal Skull was still a stinker at times. Doesnt make him a bad director. Its too easy to blame the director all the time and I think in this case the director wasnt solely at fault. I thought he did a great job with what he had and directing wise he did an excellent job. Its just a shame the story and the ending was so disapointing.

There was a time in hollywood (before the 60s I think) where people while judging a movie get angry towards the production.
Nowadays it's totally reversed and people blame the directors in most cases. I think it's due to the fact the Director's name in credits has been pushed in first place which wasn't the case in many movies before, most of the credits were dedicated to the screenwriters and the production.

I guess Hollywood got bored of being attacked everytime a film was cut down because of the way the production wanted it.
The main problem in JPIII is clearly the production, which may have touched the script a bit if not a lot.
Still, I thought it was a decent movie, not as good as the previous one IMO, but still good, thanks to the director and the crew performance on set. There were some memorables moments in it.  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on May 02, 2011, 08:38:46 PM
Quote from: Sharp Sticks on May 02, 2011, 08:15:25 PM
One word for you silly geese:

Spoiler
ALAN
[close]

You know, I may not like JP3 overall — but I will admit that's one of the most incredible moments ever captured on film.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alienseseses on May 02, 2011, 10:36:46 PM
I haven't seen JP3 in years, but when I saw it in theaters as a kid, I loved it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on May 02, 2011, 10:38:46 PM
Same here, dug it before I knew better. Watched it again maybe a year ago, and, well...let's just say I've got no plans to watch it again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on May 02, 2011, 10:44:13 PM
Quote from: Alienseseses on May 02, 2011, 10:36:46 PM
I haven't seen JP3 in years, but when I saw it in theaters as a kid, I loved it.

same. I watched it again about a year ago. Its fun, but its no  Jurassic Park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 03, 2011, 08:13:19 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 02, 2011, 01:31:24 PM
Totally.
And Jonston made JPIII better than it could've been based on the story alone.
The reveal of the Pteranodon is one of the best scenes in the series, and I also really like the first encounter with the Raptor in the laboratory. There's plenty of other great scenes too.
Downsides of Jurassic Park III for me, essentially, are --
-The forced 'new king' of the Island, I'm no Fanboy who whines over that, but I felt it was forced, and how the Spinosaurs kills the T.Rex is just... I dunno, too human for an animal like that? The Spinosaurus feels way too territorial too;
-The wonky premise of the storyline, could've got that off better;
-(minor) great discontinuity in the representation of Isla Sorna;
-The absurdly superficial and far-fetched ending with the soldiers and all that.

The Pteranodon scene was 1 of 2 memorable moments from the film. The second being the Spino chase at the fence. I liked the use of the phone's ringing as a kind of allusion to the crocodile from Peter Pan.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TheMonolith on May 03, 2011, 08:16:39 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 03, 2011, 08:13:19 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 02, 2011, 01:31:24 PM
Totally.
And Jonston made JPIII better than it could've been based on the story alone.
The reveal of the Pteranodon is one of the best scenes in the series, and I also really like the first encounter with the Raptor in the laboratory. There's plenty of other great scenes too.
Downsides of Jurassic Park III for me, essentially, are --
-The forced 'new king' of the Island, I'm no Fanboy who whines over that, but I felt it was forced, and how the Spinosaurs kills the T.Rex is just... I dunno, too human for an animal like that? The Spinosaurus feels way too territorial too;
-The wonky premise of the storyline, could've got that off better;
-(minor) great discontinuity in the representation of Isla Sorna;
-The absurdly superficial and far-fetched ending with the soldiers and all that.

The Pteranodon scene was 1 of 2 memorable moments from the film. The second being the Spino chase at the fence. I liked the use of the phone's ringing as a kind of allusion to the crocodile from Peter Pan.
A nice moment indeed. Always reminded me of the classic urban legend about a dog that swallows a new phone. Ends the same way. Dog goes and girl digs through the stuff and finds it in working order.
Richard Roeper mentioned that in his book on urban legends.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 03, 2011, 08:19:03 PM
I like Ceratosaur moment. Good comedic moment that worked well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 03, 2011, 08:32:36 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 02, 2011, 01:31:24 PM
-The forced 'new king' of the Island, I'm no Fanboy who whines over that, but I felt it was forced, and how the Spinosaurs kills the T.Rex is just... I dunno, too human for an animal like that? The Spinosaurus feels way too territorial too;
Not to mention it just popped out of thin air, having not existed in The Lost World.

Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 02, 2011, 01:31:24 PM
-The wonky premise of the storyline, could've got that off better;
It really was a lame, and poorly done reason to get Grant back to the island. And who the f**k thinks "OH! We have our highly trained mercenaries, now lets get a paleontologist who knows a lot about dinosaurs, and has been to an island with them, that ISN'T EVEN THE ONE WE'RE f**kING GOING TO!". I hated the story.

Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 02, 2011, 01:31:24 PM
-(minor) great discontinuity in the representation of Isla Sorna;
Ugh, I know. That's a pretty big one for me. I loved how boreal Isla Sorna looked in The Lost World, and I liked it as much (and in some ways more) as Isla Nublar in JP (each for different reasons). The island just didn't look interesting or cool to see the dinosaurs in at all in JP III. It was a complete different environment. Bullshit.

Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 02, 2011, 01:31:24 PM
-The absurdly superficial and far-fetched ending with the soldiers and all that.
Goes without saying. That disgusted me when I was seven.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on May 03, 2011, 08:41:21 PM
For me the whole thing with the satellite phone being swallowed by the Spino was f**king ridiculous. Its actually my biggest gripe with the film. So you can hear it ringing perfectly loud and clear as if its in your pocket when its inside of a mahoosive dinosaur standing over a football field away?

Its been a while but that right there deserves a comeback from old Tommy.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F28.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_kpow8oLDpP1qzma4ho1_500.jpg&hash=078eb63d77502b948eceec28434f1b5f950b75c7)

I enjoy the film, its entertaining to watch, the ending is piss poor and the Spino and T-Rex thing is handled badly but I still like it. The phone thing though is my biggest gripe. Its just too cartoonish and ridiculous to believe.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on May 03, 2011, 08:45:02 PM
They really wasted the whole "lone survivor" concept there.

The best i can think of is some lame crossbreed of Turok, Stalker and Tresspaser and i am still firmly convinced it would be better just for that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 03, 2011, 08:59:59 PM
I would have preferred a longer, more drawn out T.Rex/Spino fight at the end, when Kirby was hanging from the crane. Would've been more intense.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 03, 2011, 09:39:39 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 03, 2011, 08:32:36 PM
Not to mention it just popped out of thin air, having not existed in The Lost World.
Totally, I used to wonder a lot about the Spinosaurus' (and some others, too) sudden appearence too. I came to the conclusion that... there are countless speculations over how the f**k did that thing pop out, the film doesn't really go further than a blunt mention on the matter; but after all, we do see an Anatotitan skull, not seen alive anywhere, in the second flick; they just needed something new and fresh to make the film appeal to the audiences more. Also, Horner shot so much bullshit about the Spinosaurus in the making of that a cow with diarrhea could not compete with him. ::)
A positive factor, though, would be that the film is one of the first forms of media portraying the Spinosaurus in a (mostly, as in all the other dinosaurs) realistic reconstruction of its anatomy; beforehand, the most knew the Spinosaurus as, basically, a Tyrannosaurus with a sail on its back. The film helped to dismantle this belief.

Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 03, 2011, 08:32:36 PM
Ugh, I know. That's a pretty big one for me. I loved how boreal Isla Sorna looked in The Lost World, and I liked it as much (and in some ways more) as Isla Nublar in JP (each for different reasons). The island just didn't look interesting or cool to see the dinosaurs in at all in JP III. It was a complete different environment. Bullshit.
In reality I am a f**king nut when it comes to the Inter-continuity between two films, things like this are equal to changing an actor, a real sore thumb for me. I am sure some locations in III are the same as those of the first film, I still wonder why they did not go back to the original locations; when I saw the film I was confused, the writing said Sorna, but it looked like Nublar.
I am not talking about the island only, too. Some creatures lack continuity in appearence! I can understand, say, different color schemes, but why do Raptors suddenly have quills? Why do Pteranodons have teeth (when, ironically, Pteranodon means 'wings and toothless')? Those changes were made for a reason or the other, more accurate for the Raptors for example, but why don't they bother just to explain it just with a small mention?
I have just learned that I do not have to include that into my valuation of the flick.

Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 03, 2011, 08:32:36 PM
Goes without saying. That disgusted me when I was seven.
LOL, first time I saw it I was like '...eh? Soldiers?!' xD
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 03, 2011, 10:26:50 PM
I am in agreement about the soldiers scene. Grant and Co. are on the beach yelling at the guy with the megaphone and...*poof* up comes a f**king armada of soldiers, ships and vehicles out of thin air.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 03, 2011, 10:34:45 PM
Remember; helicopters are silent.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 03, 2011, 10:39:02 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 03, 2011, 09:39:39 PM
Spoiler
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 03, 2011, 08:32:36 PM
Not to mention it just popped out of thin air, having not existed in The Lost World.
Totally, I used to wonder a lot about the Spinosaurus' (and some others, too) sudden appearence too. I came to the conclusion that... there are countless speculations over how the f**k did that thing pop out, the film doesn't really go further than a blunt mention on the matter; but after all, we do see an Anatotitan skull, not seen alive anywhere, in the second flick; they just needed something new and fresh to make the film appeal to the audiences more. Also, Horner shot so much bullshit about the Spinosaurus in the making of that a cow with diarrhea could not compete with him. ::)
A positive factor, though, would be that the film is one of the first forms of media portraying the Spinosaurus in a (mostly, as in all the other dinosaurs) realistic reconstruction of its anatomy; beforehand, the most knew the Spinosaurus as, basically, a Tyrannosaurus with a sail on its back. The film helped to dismantle this belief.

Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 03, 2011, 08:32:36 PM
Ugh, I know. That's a pretty big one for me. I loved how boreal Isla Sorna looked in The Lost World, and I liked it as much (and in some ways more) as Isla Nublar in JP (each for different reasons). The island just didn't look interesting or cool to see the dinosaurs in at all in JP III. It was a complete different environment. Bullshit.
In reality I am a f**king nut when it comes to the Inter-continuity between two films, things like this are equal to changing an actor, a real sore thumb for me. I am sure some locations in III are the same as those of the first film, I still wonder why they did not go back to the original locations; when I saw the film I was confused, the writing said Sorna, but it looked like Nublar.
I am not talking about the island only, too. Some creatures lack continuity in appearence! I can understand, say, different color schemes, but why do Raptors suddenly have quills? Why do Pteranodons have teeth (when, ironically, Pteranodon means 'wings and toothless')? Those changes were made for a reason or the other, more accurate for the Raptors for example, but why don't they bother just to explain it just with a small mention?
I have just learned that I do not have to include that into my valuation of the flick.

Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 03, 2011, 08:32:36 PM
Goes without saying. That disgusted me when I was seven.
LOL, first time I saw it I was like '...eh? Soldiers?!' xD
[close]
Agreed, again, on ALL counts. I should also mention that these were all things that I had noticed going to see this the first time, seven of age. I remember being really disappointed by the tyrannosaurus-spinosaurus fight and the new appearance of the velociraptors. I don't give a shit about how accurate they look. If they were going for accuracy, they wouldn't have kept them utahraptor size.  ::)

The thing about "just wanting the eggs" and leaving in peace was bullshit as well. Goddamnit, I just hate this film the more I think about it... best thing about it was the spino design, the velociraptor movement, and the pteranadon reveal.

Also, though I liked them when I was seven, the characters were all stupid too.

If only I could keep this hatred up long enough to write a fan-fic.  :laugh:

Quote from: SpaceMarines on May 03, 2011, 10:34:45 PM
Remember; helicopters are silent.
And those amphibious APCs were just REARIN' to go!  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: XenoVC on May 03, 2011, 10:43:59 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 03, 2011, 08:32:36 PMUgh, I know. That's a pretty big one for me. I loved how boreal Isla Sorna looked in The Lost World, and I liked it as much (and in some ways more) as Isla Nublar in JP (each for different reasons). The island just didn't look interesting or cool to see the dinosaurs in at all in JP III. It was a complete different environment. Bullshit.

Think this was justified as each film being completely different parts of the island, still doesn't make much sense.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: RagingDragon on May 03, 2011, 10:53:21 PM
Honestly, I somehow am able to overlook/forget about the dumb crap in the Jurassic Park movies, maybe that's because the actual characters still manage to be interesting?  I think that's it, not a total bomb.  Curious.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on May 03, 2011, 11:04:45 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 03, 2011, 09:39:39 PM
Why do Pteranodons have teeth (when, ironically, Pteranodon means 'wings and toothless')?

Pteranodons cannot be intimidating unless they have lots of sharp, pointy teeth to bite the ever lovin' crap outta you with with. The filmmakers knew this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 03, 2011, 11:06:13 PM
Quote from: Walk Evil Talk on May 03, 2011, 11:04:45 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 03, 2011, 09:39:39 PM
Why do Pteranodons have teeth (when, ironically, Pteranodon means 'wings and toothless')?

Pteranodons cannot be intimidating unless they have lots of sharp, pointy teeth to bite the ever lovin' crap outta you with with. The filmmakers knew this.

This.

Quote from: RagingDragon on May 03, 2011, 10:53:21 PM
Honestly, I somehow am able to overlook/forget about the dumb crap in the Jurassic Park movies, maybe that's because the actual characters still manage to be interesting?  I think that's it, not a total bomb.  Curious.

You call married couple drama interesting? This is Jurassic Park, not a chick flick.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on May 03, 2011, 11:07:58 PM
Quote from: Walk Evil Talk on May 03, 2011, 11:04:45 PM
Pteranodons cannot be intimidating unless they have lots of sharp, pointy teeth to bite the ever lovin' crap outta you with with. The filmmakers knew this.
Sharpness breeds superiority.

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F_IYXkMMD2BJo%2FTM9n04JAB1I%2FAAAAAAAAAKU%2FaKftjgdTHXY%2Fs1600%2FThis_guy.jpg&hash=71f2ae92b944c3a19bff406a19e1060cfc7e036a)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 03, 2011, 11:30:26 PM
Quote from: XenoVC on May 03, 2011, 10:43:59 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 03, 2011, 08:32:36 PMUgh, I know. That's a pretty big one for me. I loved how boreal Isla Sorna looked in The Lost World, and I liked it as much (and in some ways more) as Isla Nublar in JP (each for different reasons). The island just didn't look interesting or cool to see the dinosaurs in at all in JP III. It was a complete different environment. Bullshit.

Think this was justified as each film being completely different parts of the island, still doesn't make much sense.
Only The Lost World and JPIII were on Isla Sorna. In the Lost World, they traveled it's complete expanse, and it was boreal the whole way through, where in JPIII, it was tropical. There can't be a change like that on a single island...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on May 03, 2011, 11:36:46 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 03, 2011, 11:30:26 PM
Quote from: XenoVC on May 03, 2011, 10:43:59 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 03, 2011, 08:32:36 PMUgh, I know. That's a pretty big one for me. I loved how boreal Isla Sorna looked in The Lost World, and I liked it as much (and in some ways more) as Isla Nublar in JP (each for different reasons). The island just didn't look interesting or cool to see the dinosaurs in at all in JP III. It was a complete different environment. Bullshit.

Think this was justified as each film being completely different parts of the island, still doesn't make much sense.
Only The Lost World and JPIII were on Isla Sorna. In the Lost World, they traveled it's complete expanse, and it was boreal the whole way through, where in JPIII, it was tropical. There can't be a change like that on a single island...

Its very likely that during the operational stages of Ingen that the boreal, tropical, and swamp-like depictions were all meant for specific enclosures for dinosaurs of different time periods and areas.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 03, 2011, 11:39:56 PM
And I doubt the entire island was explored in TLW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on May 03, 2011, 11:46:19 PM
The Island would have to be gigantic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 03, 2011, 11:50:07 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 03, 2011, 11:39:56 PM
And I doubt the entire island was explored in TLW.
They commented that they were traveling to one side to the other... and that's what they did. No matter what, the evironmental change between the two films makes zero sense.

Quote from: Gate on May 03, 2011, 11:36:46 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 03, 2011, 11:30:26 PM
Quote from: XenoVC on May 03, 2011, 10:43:59 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 03, 2011, 08:32:36 PMUgh, I know. That's a pretty big one for me. I loved how boreal Isla Sorna looked in The Lost World, and I liked it as much (and in some ways more) as Isla Nublar in JP (each for different reasons). The island just didn't look interesting or cool to see the dinosaurs in at all in JP III. It was a complete different environment. Bullshit.

Think this was justified as each film being completely different parts of the island, still doesn't make much sense.
Only The Lost World and JPIII were on Isla Sorna. In the Lost World, they traveled it's complete expanse, and it was boreal the whole way through, where in JPIII, it was tropical. There can't be a change like that on a single island...

Its very likely that during the operational stages of Ingen that the boreal, tropical, and swamp-like depictions were all meant for specific enclosures for dinosaurs of different time periods and areas.
That's over-analysing it; they can't change the type of forest the island contains after the fact, and the island itself cannot truly vary. However, the change from tropical to boreal in between JP and TLW (which already makes sense due to being two different islands) was likely a more artistic choice than anything, showing a different era for the dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 04, 2011, 12:10:03 AM
The only way the boreal / tropical change could make sense is if there was a mountain range on Isla Sorna.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TheMonolith on May 04, 2011, 12:13:12 AM
There was a pretty good sized ranged in Trespasser, but then again that is EU.
...
Awesome EU!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on May 04, 2011, 12:35:33 AM
Quote from: TheMonolith on May 04, 2011, 12:13:12 AM
There was a pretty good sized ranged in Trespasser, but then again that is EU.
...
Awesome EU!

How do i... Hug you?

if only JP3 had been based of Trespasser, i can still listen to the Hammond Monologues if i concentrate hard.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 04, 2011, 12:46:52 AM
Trespasser was awesome. Best health management ever.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TheMonolith on May 04, 2011, 01:43:07 AM
I loved that game. Won it countless times. Such a fun game to explore. My only real gripes were the melee weapon system which was useless, punching in codes with that finger (doing it in real life would have been easier) and the jump, which often had you stuck at a small crate for 30 minutes.
Other than that, it was fun, the levels looked great and would be awesome on the big screen, the game had a nice flow and a consistent feel of suspense.
A flawed but good game. And a personal favorite.

Making the next JP based on this would be worth it for the sets alone. And you could have the returns of Lex and Tim as well as Annie from the game along with a rag tag Poseidon Adventure esque group of survivors from the crash.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 04, 2011, 01:57:08 AM
Quote from: TheMonolith on May 04, 2011, 01:43:07 AM
a consistent feel of suspense.
That's what I want most in a new Jurassic Park game... somebody really needs to do a survival horror Jurassic Park justice. Trespasser did a great job of re-creating the feel of TLW's Isla Sorna, too-- a version of the island, that if you can't tell from previous posts, I am greatly attatched to the look and atmosphere of.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TheMonolith on May 04, 2011, 02:04:38 AM
I agree. The level design made that game. I know the places by heart.
The beach pathway, the monorail, the trench leading to the waterfall, the canyon, the town, the dam, the warehouses, the docks, the labs, the mountain, the summit. Each one of them is begging to be put on film.

I actually do have a soft spot for JP3. Could have been better and in the end came out as a pretty average movie.
Lost World focused a lot on the action and had many cheesy elements that pulled it down but in the end is the best sequel thus far. None can come close to the original thriller.

I really do was a nice survival film. Trespasser created a place that was perfect to make a thrilling odyssey for us to follow some characters on. Throw in some raptors, T Rexes, Dilophosaurus, and maybe even a few new ones.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: XenoVC on May 04, 2011, 03:39:41 AM
Trespasser is an unfinished turd that gets over for awesome atmosphere.

Oh, and here's a nice little Sorna map from JPLegacy.org, I'm seeing some assumptions in here, but it kind of fits.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wikinfo.org%2Fupload%2F7%2F7d%2FIslaSornaMap.gif&hash=f19f5a29dd7f0cf435618e8c3a03494c0567321b)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 04, 2011, 03:53:36 AM
Quote from: XenoVC on May 04, 2011, 03:39:41 AM
Oh, and here's a nice little Sorna map from JPLegacy.org, I'm seeing some assumptions in here, but it kind of fits.
They all are. The mentioned crossing the entire damned island (which involved moving inland) in TLW, and the time differences between the distances are way off. Nice map, but the location placement is way off.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on May 04, 2011, 04:11:02 AM
Yeah, Trespasser was great. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 04, 2011, 12:42:20 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 03, 2011, 10:39:02 PM
and the new appearance of the velociraptors. I don't give a shit about how accurate they look. If they were going for accuracy, they wouldn't have kept them utahraptor size.  ::)
Totally, to be honest though I wouldn't mind the new appearence if it wasn't for two things: the quills don't make sense, and the red eyes make them look like they ate waaay too much mexican food. It's also a bit... ironic how Horner wanted more accuracy on the Raptors, yet completely goes over the Spinosaurus behaving way too territorially and the Pteranodons having teeth, which invalidates their name; I though like them a lot, if it was not for those teeth they would be just simple repaints of the Pteranodon at the end of the second film, which was by all means correct. To those people saying that the Pteranodons are not intimidating without teeth, please. The single scariest shot of them is when one turns its head around towards Grant, and it would totally have worked without teeth. If they wanted teeth, they should have used Ludodactylus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TheMonolith on May 04, 2011, 12:48:58 PM
The raptors in JP are not modeled after velociraptors but after deinonychus.
Skull structure, size, everything. In the 90s they were considered part of the same genetic group but that was eventually disregarded.
So technically, there never was a velociraptor in any JP movie. There were however tons od deinonychus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 04, 2011, 02:11:22 PM
You guys are making me want to download and install this this since my PS2 copy is in my country house:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0taMRoKO9RY# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0taMRoKO9RY#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on May 04, 2011, 04:42:26 PM
I had no idea there were so much Trespasser love in this place. I think my copy is still sitting somewhere in the basement collecting dust. Used to play it constantly.

Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 04, 2011, 12:42:20 PM
To those people saying that the Pteranodons are not intimidating without teeth, please. The single scariest shot of them is when one turns its head around towards Grant, and it would totally have worked without teeth.
'Twas just a joke. Aside from some shots of the babies it's not like the teeth are ever even shown that clearly, so they certainly could've been just as threatening without them.

BTW, did anyone else here have an addiction to the old Sega Genesis Jurassic Park game as a young'un?
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.giantbomb.com%2Fuploads%2F0%2F4187%2F223489-jurassicpark04_super.jpg&hash=380236da6bf2dbfd328ed2205e08e10dd9c0b100)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on May 04, 2011, 04:45:41 PM
Quote from: Walk Evil Talk on May 04, 2011, 04:42:26 PMBTW, did anyone else here have an addiction to the old Sega Genesis Jurassic Park game as a young'un?
http://media.giantbomb.com/uploads/0/4187/223489-jurassicpark04_super.jpg
Yeap, I used to love that game. If it's the one where you could either play as Grant or a Velociraptor that is. But I didn't get a Mega Drive until ten years after it was released or so. :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on May 04, 2011, 06:11:36 PM
oh yes. yes YES YES!

I have continuously played that game ever since. have in on an emulator on all my PCs, have it on Picodrive on my cellphone, have the ripped soundtrack laying around my download folder....

it's just awesome. the sprites, the backgrounds, every sound.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 04, 2011, 06:24:33 PM
Quote from: Walk Evil Talk on May 04, 2011, 04:42:26 PM
BTW, did anyone else here have an addiction to the old Sega Genesis Jurassic Park game as a young'un?
http://media.giantbomb.com/uploads/0/4187/223489-jurassicpark04_super.jpg
f**k yes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on May 04, 2011, 06:29:07 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBmBy8vchCw# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBmBy8vchCw#)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ty7FEY8vMxc# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ty7FEY8vMxc#)

you are now manually breathing and hearing a Raptor roar and Grant dying.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Effectz on May 04, 2011, 06:30:43 PM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on May 04, 2011, 06:29:07 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBmBy8vchCw# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBmBy8vchCw#)

you are now manually breathing and hearing a Raptor roar and Grant dying.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBxgAmdPQWg#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBxgAmdPQWg#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 04, 2011, 09:35:37 PM
Quote from: Walk Evil Talk on May 04, 2011, 04:42:26 PM
BTW, did anyone else here have an addiction to the old Sega Genesis Jurassic Park game as a young'un?
http://media.giantbomb.com/uploads/0/4187/223489-jurassicpark04_super.jpg

Never played it. I was very much into The Chaos Continues though, if you ever played it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on May 05, 2011, 09:43:29 AM
Never played that one, but it looks pretty similar to the Sega games judging by the videos I've seen.

Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on May 04, 2011, 06:11:36 PM
oh yes. yes YES YES!

I have continuously played that game ever since. have in on an emulator on all my PCs, have it on Picodrive on my cellphone, have the ripped soundtrack laying around my download folder....

it's just awesome. the sprites, the backgrounds, every sound.
It was one of the games of my childhood. I loved Rampage Edition, too. Especially the level in which you ride a f**kin' Gallimimus whilst evading missiles from a helicopter.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.giantbomb.com%2Fuploads%2F0%2F4187%2F255755-rampageedition04_super.jpg&hash=ffcf3d0a20a92b30d2333e92b4734df1d7daab3a)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on May 05, 2011, 01:10:41 PM
That makes lots of sense. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on May 05, 2011, 01:53:47 PM
i only ever had the Ocean JP PC game, now i feel like i missed out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on May 05, 2011, 01:57:07 PM
Did anyone here do Scan Command?  That was great. ;D  My friends and I used to play the game on 2 fronts.  Some of us would play the game fighting enemy dinos with our dinos and others would scan bar codes to upgrade our fighting capabilities.  I'm telling you; Scan Command was some pretty awesome sh!t. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: XenoVC on May 06, 2011, 01:31:27 AM
Quote from: predxeno on May 05, 2011, 01:10:41 PM
That makes lots of sense. :D

It kind of does, in a Chicken Soup for the island Cowboy's Soul way, sir logic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on May 06, 2011, 01:42:42 AM
Quote from: Walk Evil Talk on May 04, 2011, 04:42:26 PM
BTW, did anyone else here have an addiction to the old Sega Genesis Jurassic Park game as a young'un?
http://media.giantbomb.com/uploads/0/4187/223489-jurassicpark04_super.jpg

I had that game from 1997-1998, I loved it. I always loved the PS1 game of "The Lost World: Jurassic Park" as well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 06, 2011, 03:07:05 AM
Quote from: AvatarIII on May 05, 2011, 01:53:47 PM
i only ever had the Ocean JP PC game, now i feel like i missed out.

Played it; nothing special.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on May 06, 2011, 03:24:23 AM
I thought The Chaos continues was good until i had to face the raptors. there is a reason i don't like QTE nowadays...

the PS1 was great all around except for how frustrating was to ending up killing yourself when you switched characters.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on May 06, 2011, 09:20:23 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 06, 2011, 03:07:05 AM
Quote from: AvatarIII on May 05, 2011, 01:53:47 PM
i only ever had the Ocean JP PC game, now i feel like i missed out.

Played it; nothing special.
yeah it was pretty bland,
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 07, 2011, 03:55:35 AM
Here's to hoping TT's new JP game re-ignites interest in JP IV. If it does well, Universal might take notice.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on May 07, 2011, 04:06:40 AM
Anyone else remembers the "Lost World: JP" arcade game?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 07, 2011, 05:25:10 AM
The light-rail shooter? Yeah, I remember playing that a few times. Loved that thing. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: EEV2650 on May 07, 2011, 08:35:04 AM
Here's what I played  :laugh:
http://youtu.be/g1EGNaPTACc (http://youtu.be/g1EGNaPTACc)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on May 07, 2011, 12:26:55 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on May 07, 2011, 04:06:40 AM
Anyone else remembers the "Lost World: JP" arcade game?

Hell yeah! :laugh:

I used to love the JP III one as well. Played it as a kid and that first appearance of the Spinosaurus scared the crap out me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 07, 2011, 01:31:59 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on May 07, 2011, 04:06:40 AM
Anyone else remembers the "Lost World: JP" arcade game?

Hell yes, one of the best arcade games ever! It's still around at my local Playdium ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on May 07, 2011, 04:33:15 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on May 07, 2011, 12:26:55 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on May 07, 2011, 04:06:40 AM
Anyone else remembers the "Lost World: JP" arcade game?

Hell yeah! :laugh:

I used to love the JP III one as well. Played it as a kid and that first appearance of the Spinosaurus scared the crap out me.

I remember the JP III as well. It was taken out of the local bowling alley I used to go to.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on May 07, 2011, 04:41:59 PM
I beat the arcade games for all 3 movies. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on May 07, 2011, 07:07:42 PM
Quote from: EEV2650 on May 07, 2011, 08:35:04 AM
Here's what I played  :laugh:
http://youtu.be/g1EGNaPTACc (http://youtu.be/g1EGNaPTACc)

Im looking right at that SNES game at this very instant in my hand. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on May 07, 2011, 09:07:14 PM
Some light reading...

http://www.fileden.com/files/2007/7/10/1255595/Jurassic%20Park%204%20Screenplay.pdf (http://www.fileden.com/files/2007/7/10/1255595/Jurassic%20Park%204%20Screenplay.pdf)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on May 08, 2011, 01:42:14 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 07, 2011, 09:07:14 PM
Some light reading...

http://www.fileden.com/files/2007/7/10/1255595/Jurassic%20Park%204%20Screenplay.pdf (http://www.fileden.com/files/2007/7/10/1255595/Jurassic%20Park%204%20Screenplay.pdf)
I love it, especially Goldblum's sarcasm
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on May 08, 2011, 02:25:38 AM
The Lost World: JP arcade game was awesome and is still awesome. I remember playing it for the first time when it was released and I was like "WOW!". I know the arcades in Ocean City, MD still have the game.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: EEV2650 on May 08, 2011, 03:58:57 AM
Quote from: Gate on May 07, 2011, 07:07:42 PM
Quote from: EEV2650 on May 07, 2011, 08:35:04 AM
Here's what I played  :laugh:
http://youtu.be/g1EGNaPTACc (http://youtu.be/g1EGNaPTACc)

Im looking right at that SNES game at this very instant in my hand. :D

I still own that game along with my original SNES console. I break them out every once in a while.  I'm a very nostalgic person. Thats probably why no one likes being around me. I'll go into rants about how life just sucks nowadays and the 90's - early 2000's was where the good times were  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 08, 2011, 02:43:45 PM
I think the best JP game ever was Warpath. Granted it was a whole lot of button mashing and the difficulty was very aggravating at times but come on: IT WAS DINOSAURS FIGHTING!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on May 08, 2011, 05:04:49 PM
All I ever had was JPIII: Danger Zone. My parents didn't love me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on May 08, 2011, 05:11:53 PM
Quote from: Gate on May 08, 2011, 01:42:14 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 07, 2011, 09:07:14 PM
Some light reading...

http://www.fileden.com/files/2007/7/10/1255595/Jurassic%20Park%204%20Screenplay.pdf (http://www.fileden.com/files/2007/7/10/1255595/Jurassic%20Park%204%20Screenplay.pdf)
I love it, especially Goldblum's sarcasm
I just finished this script, It's fantastic. I've never seen something so glorious. There are times when you can see fan service, such as finding the dead Spinosaur.. but the ending scene had me literally emotional..
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Yautja117 on May 08, 2011, 11:51:37 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 08, 2011, 02:43:45 PM
I think the best JP game ever was Warpath. Granted it was a whole lot of button mashing and the difficulty was very aggravating at times but come on: IT WAS DINOSAURS FIGHTING!!!!
I still have that game. T-rex ftw.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on May 09, 2011, 01:16:24 AM
Quote from: Sharp Sticks on May 08, 2011, 05:04:49 PM
All I ever had was JPIII: Danger Zone. My parents didn't love me.

That was a great game.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on May 09, 2011, 08:15:51 AM
Quote from: Gate on May 08, 2011, 05:11:53 PM
Quote from: Gate on May 08, 2011, 01:42:14 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 07, 2011, 09:07:14 PM
Some light reading...

http://www.fileden.com/files/2007/7/10/1255595/Jurassic%20Park%204%20Screenplay.pdf (http://www.fileden.com/files/2007/7/10/1255595/Jurassic%20Park%204%20Screenplay.pdf)
I love it, especially Goldblum's sarcasm
I just finished this script, It's fantastic. I've never seen something so glorious. There are times when you can see fan service, such as finding the dead Spinosaur.. but the ending scene had me literally emotional..

If only Hollywood could read it...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on May 10, 2011, 07:54:04 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 07, 2011, 09:07:14 PM
Some light reading...

http://www.fileden.com/files/2007/7/10/1255595/Jurassic%20Park%204%20Screenplay.pdf (http://www.fileden.com/files/2007/7/10/1255595/Jurassic%20Park%204%20Screenplay.pdf)

Enjoyed reading this  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 10, 2011, 08:17:51 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 07, 2011, 09:07:14 PM
Some light reading...

http://www.fileden.com/files/2007/7/10/1255595/Jurassic%20Park%204%20Screenplay.pdf (http://www.fileden.com/files/2007/7/10/1255595/Jurassic%20Park%204%20Screenplay.pdf)

Lots of stuff borrowed from TLW novel. It's awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on May 10, 2011, 10:37:27 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on May 10, 2011, 08:17:51 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 07, 2011, 09:07:14 PM
Some light reading...

http://www.fileden.com/files/2007/7/10/1255595/Jurassic%20Park%204%20Screenplay.pdf (http://www.fileden.com/files/2007/7/10/1255595/Jurassic%20Park%204%20Screenplay.pdf)

Lots of stuff borrowed from TLW novel. It's awesome.

I'd love to see Dodgson as the films main villain, as in the "Dodgson" we see in the first film is just a fall guy. So the main characters are not only pitted against the dinosaurs but a gang of corporate killers.

I'd also love to see one rogue raptor that is relentless and really scary. I think that would be a perfect next step for the character of the raptors.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Michael Harper on May 10, 2011, 10:43:26 PM
I hope the film is awesome when it comes out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 11, 2011, 02:59:22 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 10, 2011, 10:37:27 PM
I'd also love to see one rogue raptor that is relentless and really scary. I think that would be a perfect next step for the character of the raptors.

Could do without. Sick of raptors being the focal point of the films.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on May 11, 2011, 03:44:13 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbelieber.files.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F12%2Fdilophosaurus-jurassic-park.jpg&hash=960883e01e0d0d388720122601af7566fbdb2e08)

If JP4 must happen, I wanna see some venom fly.

In 3D.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on May 11, 2011, 03:52:00 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1201.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fbb349%2FSharpSticks%2Fmofugga.jpg&hash=52064939c099b3ac692d960daeb93a6ad28e8ee7)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TheMonolith on May 11, 2011, 03:53:28 AM
Thank you! I have been looking all over for that.

Must have one hell of an orgin story.  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on May 11, 2011, 04:38:30 AM
Quote from: Walk Evil Talk on May 11, 2011, 03:44:13 AM
http://belieber.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/dilophosaurus-jurassic-park.jpg

If JP4 must happen, I wanna see some venom fly.

In 3D.

The Dilophosauruses are one of the most famous dinos in the JP franchise.  Wonder why they never made it into any of the sequels. ???
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 11, 2011, 06:11:48 AM
I assume they didn't want to touch the brilliance of that one scene that it was used in in the original. It would probably seem a bit gimmicky to use the whole venom spitting thing twice.

Then again, Jurassic Park 3...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on May 11, 2011, 10:33:49 AM
i watched JP3 last night and it occured to me why some of the dinos are colourful and some aren't.... because they are MALES!!! it never occured to me before :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 11, 2011, 11:15:13 AM
JP3's raptors are best in the saga IMO. Sexy-looking motherf**kers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on May 11, 2011, 01:40:34 PM
In my opinion, you can't outdo the Velociraptor's from the first movie. Vicious bastards. The raptors in JPIII only wanted their precious babies. The raptors in JP seemed like they killed more for fun than anything else.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on May 11, 2011, 04:03:24 PM
Quote from: Laufey on May 11, 2011, 01:40:34 PM
In my opinion, you can't outdo the Velociraptor's from the first movie. Vicious bastards. The raptors in JPIII only wanted their precious babies. The raptors in JP seemed like they killed more for fun than anything else.

Agree with you entirely. JP1 Raptors are evil, and I love it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on May 11, 2011, 04:15:59 PM
they just seem like animals to me, not evil at all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 11, 2011, 04:19:31 PM
Quote from: Laufey on May 11, 2011, 01:40:34 PM
In my opinion, you can't outdo the Velociraptor's from the first movie. Vicious bastards. The raptors in JPIII only wanted their precious babies. The raptors in JP seemed like they killed more for fun than anything else.
I agree. They were cunning and vicious hunters, the JPIII raptors just looked lame and acted lame as well. "Oh, we just want the eggs and we'll be going."

-_-
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 11, 2011, 04:38:57 PM
Quote from: Remonster on May 11, 2011, 04:03:24 PM
Quote from: Laufey on May 11, 2011, 01:40:34 PM
In my opinion, you can't outdo the Velociraptor's from the first movie. Vicious bastards. The raptors in JPIII only wanted their precious babies. The raptors in JP seemed like they killed more for fun than anything else.

Agree with you entirely. JP1 Raptors are evil, and I love it.

One of my favorite scenes...comes from the Lost World in which the InGen folks are making their way through the long grass - and the camera is an above shot, and the audience sees the Raptors coming through the grass in all directions, ready to attack. Those guys had no f**king chance.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on May 11, 2011, 04:48:46 PM
Quote from: Laufey on May 11, 2011, 01:40:34 PM
In my opinion, you can't outdo the Velociraptor's from the first movie. Vicious bastards. The raptors in JPIII only wanted their precious babies. The raptors in JP seemed like they killed more for fun than anything else.
Agreed, the raptors in the first film are some scary mama jammas. I love how they're hidden for most of the movie, then it's all like
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F26.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_ljvqv0yWqc1qb6kd0o1_500.gif&hash=9ecd97cc22d0918e31d6a5342cd6c0e25624a606)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on May 11, 2011, 04:54:00 PM
My mom was always telling me that the cow ate the raptors in that one scene. I was almost convinced, naive youngling that I was. She's such a troll.

The raptors were the ultimate badasses. Click-click-click, click-click click.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on May 11, 2011, 05:09:08 PM
Quote from: Walk Evil Talk on May 11, 2011, 04:48:46 PM
Quote from: Laufey on May 11, 2011, 01:40:34 PM
In my opinion, you can't outdo the Velociraptor's from the first movie. Vicious bastards. The raptors in JPIII only wanted their precious babies. The raptors in JP seemed like they killed more for fun than anything else.
Agreed, the raptors in the first film are some scary mama jammas. I love how they're hidden for most of the movie, then it's all like
http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ljvqv0yWqc1qb6kd0o1_500.gif

that face she pulls and her line always annoyed me,
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Huol on May 11, 2011, 05:15:03 PM
Quote from: Walk Evil Talk on May 11, 2011, 04:48:46 PM
Quote from: Laufey on May 11, 2011, 01:40:34 PM
In my opinion, you can't outdo the Velociraptor's from the first movie. Vicious bastards. The raptors in JPIII only wanted their precious babies. The raptors in JP seemed like they killed more for fun than anything else.
Agreed, the raptors in the first film are some scary mama jammas. I love how they're hidden for most of the movie, then it's all like
http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ljvqv0yWqc1qb6kd0o1_500.gif


Can't see that without thinking of

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prgm4eKq6d4# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prgm4eKq6d4#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 11, 2011, 06:35:33 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 11, 2011, 04:19:31 PM
Quote from: Laufey on May 11, 2011, 01:40:34 PM
In my opinion, you can't outdo the Velociraptor's from the first movie. Vicious bastards. The raptors in JPIII only wanted their precious babies. The raptors in JP seemed like they killed more for fun than anything else.
I agree. They were cunning and vicious hunters, the JPIII raptors just looked lame and acted lame as well. "Oh, we just want the eggs and we'll be going."

-_-
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Floyalkng.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2010%2F04%2Fhaters-gonna-hate-32402-1270523864-286.jpg&hash=0f12766887041b808748595ab29892822c9e3afd)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on May 11, 2011, 07:20:39 PM
Quote from: Huol on May 11, 2011, 05:15:03 PM
Quote from: Walk Evil Talk on May 11, 2011, 04:48:46 PM
Quote from: Laufey on May 11, 2011, 01:40:34 PM
In my opinion, you can't outdo the Velociraptor's from the first movie. Vicious bastards. The raptors in JPIII only wanted their precious babies. The raptors in JP seemed like they killed more for fun than anything else.
Agreed, the raptors in the first film are some scary mama jammas. I love how they're hidden for most of the movie, then it's all like
http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ljvqv0yWqc1qb6kd0o1_500.gif


Can't see that without thinking of

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prgm4eKq6d4# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prgm4eKq6d4#)

lmao  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on May 11, 2011, 07:39:33 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 11, 2011, 02:59:22 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 10, 2011, 10:37:27 PM
I'd also love to see one rogue raptor that is relentless and really scary. I think that would be a perfect next step for the character of the raptors.

Could do without. Sick of raptors being the focal point of the films.

They don't have to be the focal point it could just have one scary ass scene, much like the Dilophosaurus in Jurassic Park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TheMonolith on May 11, 2011, 07:42:03 PM
JP without Deinonychus just won't cut it. The fans love em.
They tried cutting out T Rex and look how well that worked out.
Granted, other dinos need screen time as well, and I would love to see Carcharodontosaurus and more Ceratosaurus and most certainly much more Dilophosaurus. Maybe even some full grone Dilos this time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 11, 2011, 07:56:02 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 11, 2011, 04:19:31 PM
Quote from: Laufey on May 11, 2011, 01:40:34 PM
In my opinion, you can't outdo the Velociraptor's from the first movie. Vicious bastards. The raptors in JPIII only wanted their precious babies. The raptors in JP seemed like they killed more for fun than anything else.
I agree. They were cunning and vicious hunters, the JPIII raptors just looked lame and acted lame as well. "Oh, we just want the eggs and we'll be going."

-_-

Acted lame? Not sure I'd call setting a trap then breaking someone's neck lame.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 11, 2011, 08:08:45 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 11, 2011, 07:56:02 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 11, 2011, 04:19:31 PM
Quote from: Laufey on May 11, 2011, 01:40:34 PM
In my opinion, you can't outdo the Velociraptor's from the first movie. Vicious bastards. The raptors in JPIII only wanted their precious babies. The raptors in JP seemed like they killed more for fun than anything else.
I agree. They were cunning and vicious hunters, the JPIII raptors just looked lame and acted lame as well. "Oh, we just want the eggs and we'll be going."

-_-

Acted lame? Not sure I'd call setting a trap then breaking someone's neck lame.
It was. The was no real tension to it, and it was just a blatant "THEY HAVE EVOLVED!! :o" moment.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on May 11, 2011, 08:18:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 11, 2011, 07:56:02 PMActed lame? Not sure I'd call setting a trap then breaking someone's neck lame.

I didn't like that and the same goes for the Spinosaurus breaking the T-Rex's neck. It felt more like a finishing move than natural behaviour.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 11, 2011, 08:19:46 PM
Quote from: Laufey on May 11, 2011, 08:18:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 11, 2011, 07:56:02 PMActed lame? Not sure I'd call setting a trap then breaking someone's neck lame.

I didn't like that and the same goes for the Spinosaurus breaking the T-Rex's neck. It felt more like a finishing move than natural behaviour.
I agree. That stuff wasn't cool, it was tacky and lame.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 11, 2011, 09:26:35 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 11, 2011, 07:56:02 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 11, 2011, 04:19:31 PM
Quote from: Laufey on May 11, 2011, 01:40:34 PM
In my opinion, you can't outdo the Velociraptor's from the first movie. Vicious bastards. The raptors in JPIII only wanted their precious babies. The raptors in JP seemed like they killed more for fun than anything else.
I agree. They were cunning and vicious hunters, the JPIII raptors just looked lame and acted lame as well. "Oh, we just want the eggs and we'll be going."

-_-

Acted lame? Not sure I'd call setting a trap then breaking someone's neck lame.

Suddenly appearing through the leaves to eat Muldoon alive is scary. Breaking someones neck and "talking to each other" is as Sweeper pointed out... a bit lame.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 12, 2011, 02:24:19 AM
Believe it or not, cat scans of the Velociraptor brain have revealed that they were capable of communication amongst each other.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 12, 2011, 02:25:26 AM
But... they did that in the movie, too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on May 12, 2011, 02:26:43 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 12, 2011, 02:24:19 AM
Believe it or not, cat scans of the Velociraptor brain have revealed that they were capable of communication amongst each other.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wearysloth.com%2FGallery%2FActorsN%2F31812-25445.gif&hash=c8c90beb9fb190a9f7293ab9c8e06e4187e49b41)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TheMonolith on May 12, 2011, 02:28:10 AM
Unless catscans show that Deinonychus (the actual species portrayed in the film) could do that, I'm not buying.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 12, 2011, 02:28:56 AM
Quote from: Sharp Sticks on May 12, 2011, 02:26:43 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 12, 2011, 02:24:19 AM
Believe it or not, cat scans of the Velociraptor brain have revealed that they were capable of communication amongst each other.
http://www.wearysloth.com/Gallery/ActorsN/31812-25445.gif

What? I'm serious. Came from Jack Horner himself.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 12, 2011, 02:30:03 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 12, 2011, 02:28:56 AM
Quote from: Sharp Sticks on May 12, 2011, 02:26:43 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 12, 2011, 02:24:19 AM
Believe it or not, cat scans of the Velociraptor brain have revealed that they were capable of communication amongst each other.
http://www.wearysloth.com/Gallery/ActorsN/31812-25445.gif

What? I'm serious. Came from Jack Horner himself.
And it was put in the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on May 12, 2011, 02:31:09 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 12, 2011, 02:30:03 AM
And it was put in the film.

Mmhm.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 12, 2011, 02:32:13 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 12, 2011, 02:30:03 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 12, 2011, 02:28:56 AM
Quote from: Sharp Sticks on May 12, 2011, 02:26:43 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 12, 2011, 02:24:19 AM
Believe it or not, cat scans of the Velociraptor brain have revealed that they were capable of communication amongst each other.
http://www.wearysloth.com/Gallery/ActorsN/31812-25445.gif

What? I'm serious. Came from Jack Horner himself.
And it was put in the film.

Yes, but the vibe I'm getting from this thread is that some people didn't believe that and feel it was only put in the film to amp up the action.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TheMonolith on May 12, 2011, 02:37:09 AM
Hello?
...
Deinonychus?
...
Anyone?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Kimarhi on May 12, 2011, 02:38:48 AM
Velociraptors were much smaller critters than the things shown in JP.  Which are the big D's, just misidentified or misused because they are bigger and more frightening than things the average person probably was taller and heavier than.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 12, 2011, 02:39:26 AM
Nah, I'll believe it, but we're just saying that the JP3 raptors were laaaaame. Both in design and actions. And Jack Horner, pfft, Jack Horner insists on giving them feathers, yet he doesn't give a shit about the size of the dinosaur he calls velociraptor? f**k off, Jack Horner.

Quote from: TheMonolith on May 12, 2011, 02:28:10 AM
Deinonychus (the actual species portrayed in the film)
In appearance, yes, but for as they're labeled as velociraptors, I'll be calling them that. Jack Horner seems to be doing the same thing, but of course he insists of giving them feathers and changing their colours, and giving them telephones...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on May 12, 2011, 02:40:11 AM
The movies feature Velociraptor antirrhopus. It was still '93.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 12, 2011, 02:45:37 AM
Quote from: TheMonolith on May 12, 2011, 02:37:09 AM
Hello?
...
Deinonychus?
...
Anyone?

I know they're Deinonychus. But Velociraptor is the more exotic name of the two, hence why it was used.

Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 12, 2011, 02:39:26 AM
Nah, I'll believe it, but we're just saying that the JP3 raptors were laaaaame. Both in design and actions. And Jack Horner, pfft, Jack Horner insists on giving them feathers, yet he doesn't give a shit about the size of the dinosaur he calls velociraptor? f**k off, Jack Horner.

Think the name is more at the behest of the writer and director.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on May 12, 2011, 02:48:00 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 12, 2011, 02:45:37 AM
I know they're Deinonychus. But Velociraptor is the more exotic name of the two, hence why it was used.

Also because Deinonychus wasn't the name of the animal until around post-production. But yeah, one definitely sounds cooler than the other.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 12, 2011, 02:49:42 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 12, 2011, 02:45:37 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 12, 2011, 02:39:26 AM
Nah, I'll believe it, but we're just saying that the JP3 raptors were laaaaame. Both in design and actions. And Jack Horner, pfft, Jack Horner insists on giving them feathers, yet he doesn't give a shit about the size of the dinosaur he calls velociraptor? f**k off, Jack Horner.

Think the name is more at the behest of the writer and director.
Dude still was the advisor. He called them as such in the special features as well... I think the commentary even. Never made an attempt at correcting it.

I really don't care about that though. I just hate the stupid 'evolution' bullshit that they insisted on implying that it had happened on the island after a couple of years. Yes, and also in that time, a fish swam outta the ocean, grew legs and it started walking. That motherf**ker was spinosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Kimarhi on May 12, 2011, 02:50:16 AM
If its instinctive for felines to always go for the neck, and apes to use weapons on other apes, is it really that much of a stretch to think a Raptor couldn't know how to break necks?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 12, 2011, 02:53:53 AM
I'll admit, Spinosaurus did just kind of pop up out of nowhere. But I'm willing to believe what Grant says to Billy: "It wasn't <on their list>. Makes you wonder what else they were up to."

Quote from: Sharp Sticks on May 12, 2011, 02:48:00 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 12, 2011, 02:45:37 AM
I know they're Deinonychus. But Velociraptor is the more exotic name of the two, hence why it was used.

Also because Deinonychus wasn't the name of the animal until around post-production. But yeah, one definitely sounds cooler than the other.

Eh? Deinonychus antirrhopus was described in 1969 ???
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TheMonolith on May 12, 2011, 02:57:18 AM
Quote from: Sharp Sticks on May 12, 2011, 02:48:00 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 12, 2011, 02:45:37 AM
I know they're Deinonychus. But Velociraptor is the more exotic name of the two, hence why it was used.

Also because Deinonychus wasn't the name of the animal until around post-production. But yeah, one definitely sounds cooler than the other.

Quote from: Sharp Sticks on May 12, 2011, 02:40:11 AM
The movies feature Velociraptor antirrhopus. It was still '93.
I know the genus changed during the filming. But did Deinonychus have that resonating chamber or was that lifted from the Mongolia ones? Because if it didn't, major error. That's what I am getting at. It was probably a pretty close portrayal in the earlier films.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 12, 2011, 03:00:31 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 12, 2011, 02:53:53 AM
I'll admit, Spinosaurus did just kind of pop up out of nowhere. But I'm willing to believe what Grant says to Billy: "It wasn't <on their list>. Makes you wonder what else they were up to."
I'm aware. I was aware 10 years ago, too. They never mention it again, as if it were going to lead to a grander scheme. As if InGen had gone back to the island and just said...
Spoiler
f**k YOU MOTHERf**kERS, WE'RE MAKING A NEW DINOSAUR AND GLUING FEATHERS TO BACK OF EVERY f**kING MALE RAPTOR'S HEAD! BRING YOUR DAUGHTER TO WORK DAY? WE PROVIDE A SHITLOAD OF PAINT, AND WE'RE TRANQING EVERY f**kING DINOSAUR ON THE GODDAMN ISLAND, SO YOUR DAUGHTER AND YOU CAN BOND WHILE SLATHERING A LIVING CREATURE WITH f**kING GLOBS OF PAINT AND LOVE! ALSO, WE'RE LABOTOMIZING THE T-REXES.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on May 12, 2011, 03:02:51 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 12, 2011, 03:00:31 AM
Spoiler
f**k YOU MOTHERf**kERS, WE'RE MAKING A NEW DINOSAUR AND GLUING FEATHERS TO BACK OF EVERY f**kING MALE RAPTOR'S HEAD! BRING YOUR DAUGHTER TO WORK DAY? WE PROVIDE A SHITLOAD OF PAINT, AND WE'RE TRANQING EVERY f**kING DINOSAUR ON THE GODDAMN ISLAND, SO YOUR DAUGHTER AND YOU CAN BOND WHILE SLATHERING A LIVING CREATURE WITH f**kING GLOBS OF PAINT AND LOVE! ALSO, WE'RE LABOTOMIZING THE T-REXES.
[close]

After that, I find it hard to believe you've never played Portal 2.

Anyway, take my input with a grain of salt. I haven't cleaned out my paleontologist boots in a few years.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on May 12, 2011, 03:05:48 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 12, 2011, 03:00:31 AM
Spoiler
f**k YOU MOTHERf**kERS, WE'RE MAKING A NEW DINOSAUR AND GLUING FEATHERS TO BACK OF EVERY f**kING MALE RAPTOR'S HEAD! BRING YOUR DAUGHTER TO WORK DAY? WE PROVIDE A SHITLOAD OF PAINT, AND WE'RE TRANQING EVERY f**kING DINOSAUR ON THE GODDAMN ISLAND, SO YOUR DAUGHTER AND YOU CAN BOND WHILE SLATHERING A LIVING CREATURE WITH f**kING GLOBS OF PAINT AND LOVE! ALSO, WE'RE LABOTOMIZING THE T-REXES.
[close]

Also, put some teef in our Pteranodons. MAKE EM SCAREH
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 12, 2011, 03:17:29 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 12, 2011, 03:00:31 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 12, 2011, 02:53:53 AM
I'll admit, Spinosaurus did just kind of pop up out of nowhere. But I'm willing to believe what Grant says to Billy: "It wasn't <on their list>. Makes you wonder what else they were up to."
I'm aware. I was aware 10 years ago, too. They never mention it again, as if it were going to lead to a grander scheme. As if InGen had gone back to the island and just said...
Spoiler
f**k YOU MOTHERf**kERS, WE'RE MAKING A NEW DINOSAUR AND GLUING FEATHERS TO BACK OF EVERY f**kING MALE RAPTOR'S HEAD! BRING YOUR DAUGHTER TO WORK DAY? WE PROVIDE A SHITLOAD OF PAINT, AND WE'RE TRANQING EVERY f**kING DINOSAUR ON THE GODDAMN ISLAND, SO YOUR DAUGHTER AND YOU CAN BOND WHILE SLATHERING A LIVING CREATURE WITH f**kING GLOBS OF PAINT AND LOVE! ALSO, WE'RE LABOTOMIZING THE T-REXES.
[close]

...

you had me at hello
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 12, 2011, 06:24:58 AM
I'd say Utahraptor...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on May 12, 2011, 06:30:34 AM
Oops, removed my message to do some modifications, didn't see your reply. :laugh:

But yeah, Deinonychus seem a bit small. Somewhere between Deinonychus and Utahraptor sounds about right.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimageshack.us%2Fm%2F94%2F1611%2Fjpraptor.png&hash=b698c8d05d5e60e28daf9ef9a5a390f7fac3f386)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on May 12, 2011, 07:30:57 AM
I don't get why some people would love to just replace the Velociraptor with Deinonychus in Jurassic Park because of a few faults with the Raptors that don't match it's real life counterpart. Remember in the world of Jurassic Park these are genetically engineered theme park monsters nothing more and nothing less. So who gives a damn what they are as long as they're kicking ass.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on May 12, 2011, 08:18:53 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 12, 2011, 03:00:31 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 12, 2011, 02:53:53 AM
I'll admit, Spinosaurus did just kind of pop up out of nowhere. But I'm willing to believe what Grant says to Billy: "It wasn't <on their list>. Makes you wonder what else they were up to."
I'm aware. I was aware 10 years ago, too. They never mention it again, as if it were going to lead to a grander scheme. As if InGen had gone back to the island and just said...
Spoiler
f**k YOU MOTHERf**kERS, WE'RE MAKING A NEW DINOSAUR AND GLUING FEATHERS TO BACK OF EVERY f**kING MALE RAPTOR'S HEAD! BRING YOUR DAUGHTER TO WORK DAY? WE PROVIDE A SHITLOAD OF PAINT, AND WE'RE TRANQING EVERY f**kING DINOSAUR ON THE GODDAMN ISLAND, SO YOUR DAUGHTER AND YOU CAN BOND WHILE SLATHERING A LIVING CREATURE WITH f**kING GLOBS OF PAINT AND LOVE! ALSO, WE'RE LABOTOMIZING THE T-REXES.
[close]

a major point in the first movie was that birds evolved from Dinos, and then you moan that they make the males colourful?
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm4.static.flickr.com%2F3472%2F3317353087_930f32c77d.jpg&hash=cf2ad5487da33a47ac63d5cd1ed04943dde1a6a4)
it makes total sense to me,
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 12, 2011, 10:16:37 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 12, 2011, 03:00:31 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 12, 2011, 02:53:53 AM
I'll admit, Spinosaurus did just kind of pop up out of nowhere. But I'm willing to believe what Grant says to Billy: "It wasn't <on their list>. Makes you wonder what else they were up to."
I'm aware. I was aware 10 years ago, too. They never mention it again, as if it were going to lead to a grander scheme. As if InGen had gone back to the island and just said...
Spoiler
f**k YOU MOTHERf**kERS, WE'RE MAKING A NEW DINOSAUR AND GLUING FEATHERS TO BACK OF EVERY f**kING MALE RAPTOR'S HEAD! BRING YOUR DAUGHTER TO WORK DAY? WE PROVIDE A SHITLOAD OF PAINT, AND WE'RE TRANQING EVERY f**kING DINOSAUR ON THE GODDAMN ISLAND, SO YOUR DAUGHTER AND YOU CAN BOND WHILE SLATHERING A LIVING CREATURE WITH f**kING GLOBS OF PAINT AND LOVE! ALSO, WE'RE LABOTOMIZING THE T-REXES.
[close]

Anyone familiar enough with the novels knows that it could've been BioSyn's doing. Sadly, the only reference to BioSyn we got in the movies was Dogson paying Nedry to get those embryos off Nublar.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 12, 2011, 02:25:23 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on May 12, 2011, 10:16:37 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 12, 2011, 03:00:31 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 12, 2011, 02:53:53 AM
I'll admit, Spinosaurus did just kind of pop up out of nowhere. But I'm willing to believe what Grant says to Billy: "It wasn't <on their list>. Makes you wonder what else they were up to."
I'm aware. I was aware 10 years ago, too. They never mention it again, as if it were going to lead to a grander scheme. As if InGen had gone back to the island and just said...
Spoiler
f**k YOU MOTHERf**kERS, WE'RE MAKING A NEW DINOSAUR AND GLUING FEATHERS TO BACK OF EVERY f**kING MALE RAPTOR'S HEAD! BRING YOUR DAUGHTER TO WORK DAY? WE PROVIDE A SHITLOAD OF PAINT, AND WE'RE TRANQING EVERY f**kING DINOSAUR ON THE GODDAMN ISLAND, SO YOUR DAUGHTER AND YOU CAN BOND WHILE SLATHERING A LIVING CREATURE WITH f**kING GLOBS OF PAINT AND LOVE! ALSO, WE'RE LABOTOMIZING THE T-REXES.
[close]

Anyone familiar enough with the novels knows that it could've been BioSyn's doing.
I am familiar with the novels. Anybody who thinks that BioSyn could have anything to do with that stupid continuity error is most likely the next Predxeno. Come on. Do you honestly think that ever crossed any of the writers minds?

Quote from: AvatarIII on May 12, 2011, 08:18:53 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 12, 2011, 03:00:31 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 12, 2011, 02:53:53 AM
I'll admit, Spinosaurus did just kind of pop up out of nowhere. But I'm willing to believe what Grant says to Billy: "It wasn't <on their list>. Makes you wonder what else they were up to."
I'm aware. I was aware 10 years ago, too. They never mention it again, as if it were going to lead to a grander scheme. As if InGen had gone back to the island and just said...
Spoiler
f**k YOU MOTHERf**kERS, WE'RE MAKING A NEW DINOSAUR AND GLUING FEATHERS TO BACK OF EVERY f**kING MALE RAPTOR'S HEAD! BRING YOUR DAUGHTER TO WORK DAY? WE PROVIDE A SHITLOAD OF PAINT, AND WE'RE TRANQING EVERY f**kING DINOSAUR ON THE GODDAMN ISLAND, SO YOUR DAUGHTER AND YOU CAN BOND WHILE SLATHERING A LIVING CREATURE WITH f**kING GLOBS OF PAINT AND LOVE! ALSO, WE'RE LABOTOMIZING THE T-REXES.
[close]

a major point in the first movie was that birds evolved from Dinos, and then you moan that they make the males colourful?
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3472/3317353087_930f32c77d.jpg
it makes total sense to me,
After already establishing a certain look for two movies? A much more intimidating one? Yes. It's a continuity issue, and they thought people would just... look right past it. They shouldn't have dumbed them down for that family-fun ending either.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 12, 2011, 02:59:54 PM
What do you think about the rest of my post? ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 12, 2011, 03:02:16 PM
The fact that you even suggested that Biosyn had anything to do with it made the rest pointless.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on May 12, 2011, 03:19:22 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 12, 2011, 02:25:23 PM
After already establishing a certain look for two movies? A much more intimidating one? Yes. It's a continuity issue, and they thought people would just... look right past it. They shouldn't have dumbed them down for that family-fun ending either.

well, in the first movie all the dinos were female, and in the 3rd there were lots of males, it only takes a bit of imagination to say that all the dinos in the second we see up close were female, born female or adolescents that haven't grown into their colours yet, for example.

as for the "family fun" ending, i agree, it's crazy that once they got the eggs back they just ran away, but maybe they just weren't hungry, or had enough food stashed somewhere, they had no reason to attempt to kill the humans, and killing them could have potentially cause retaliation, they were shown to be smart so this all makes sense.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 12, 2011, 03:21:28 PM
My take on Jurassic Park:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5TaVZ2NJQ4# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5TaVZ2NJQ4#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 12, 2011, 05:21:55 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on May 12, 2011, 03:19:22 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 12, 2011, 02:25:23 PM
After already establishing a certain look for two movies? A much more intimidating one? Yes. It's a continuity issue, and they thought people would just... look right past it. They shouldn't have dumbed them down for that family-fun ending either.

well, in the first movie all the dinos were female, and in the 3rd there were lots of males, it only takes a bit of imagination to say that all the dinos in the second we see up close were female, born female or adolescents that haven't grown into their colours yet, for example.

as for the "family fun" ending, i agree, it's crazy that once they got the eggs back they just ran away, but maybe they just weren't hungry, or had enough food stashed somewhere, they had no reason to attempt to kill the humans, and killing them could have potentially cause retaliation, they were shown to be smart so this all makes sense.

I was under the impression that they ran off at the end because the noise of the helicopter was unfamiliar and scared them off.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on May 12, 2011, 05:30:32 PM
they could have AT LEAST made a Seahawk fly over head to scare them away instead of having them run away for no reason. why did they not notice the helicopters before? Seahawks aren't that silent at all in the first place, i can tell one from five Km or more. how far away were they from the beach? why the hell weren't any Choppers patrolling earlier if they were looking for them?

if they had been rescued before the raptors found them and they had brought the eggs along it could have made for an interesting starting point for a sequel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on May 12, 2011, 06:16:16 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 12, 2011, 05:21:55 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on May 12, 2011, 03:19:22 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 12, 2011, 02:25:23 PM
After already establishing a certain look for two movies? A much more intimidating one? Yes. It's a continuity issue, and they thought people would just... look right past it. They shouldn't have dumbed them down for that family-fun ending either.

well, in the first movie all the dinos were female, and in the 3rd there were lots of males, it only takes a bit of imagination to say that all the dinos in the second we see up close were female, born female or adolescents that haven't grown into their colours yet, for example.

as for the "family fun" ending, i agree, it's crazy that once they got the eggs back they just ran away, but maybe they just weren't hungry, or had enough food stashed somewhere, they had no reason to attempt to kill the humans, and killing them could have potentially cause retaliation, they were shown to be smart so this all makes sense.

I was under the impression that they ran off at the end because the noise of the helicopter was unfamiliar and scared them off.

that makes sense too,
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 12, 2011, 07:51:51 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 12, 2011, 07:30:57 AM
I don't get why some people would love to just replace the Velociraptor with Deinonychus in Jurassic Park because of a few faults with the Raptors that don't match it's real life counterpart. Remember in the world of Jurassic Park these are genetically engineered theme park monsters nothing more and nothing less. So who gives a damn what they are as long as they're kicking ass.

For a dino buff, it's frustrating. I confess to it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on May 13, 2011, 06:37:27 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 12, 2011, 07:51:51 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 12, 2011, 07:30:57 AM
I don't get why some people would love to just replace the Velociraptor with Deinonychus in Jurassic Park because of a few faults with the Raptors that don't match it's real life counterpart. Remember in the world of Jurassic Park these are genetically engineered theme park monsters nothing more and nothing less. So who gives a damn what they are as long as they're kicking ass.

For a dino buff, it's frustrating. I confess to it.

Hey man, I'm a huge dino buff too but I'm willing to over look certain faults because a) they're cloned dinosaurs and have been tampered with by InGen, b) the Raptors are totally badass and c) its a film. 

See I believe the most frustrating part of the film is the scene where the Raptor is attacking the door trying to get into the control room, Grant and Ellie are forcing it back and trying to reach the gun yet Timmy stands there yelling at his sister instead of helping them out and giving Ellie the gun. I mean COME ON!

Still my favourite film of all time though  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 13, 2011, 02:05:11 PM
Yeah, I hear you. But then again, common sense is never common in a movie. That's why the lone teen girl keeps going down into the dark basement without a flashlight when there's a rampant serial killer coming expressly after her.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Fujimaster on May 16, 2011, 10:07:09 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 12, 2011, 05:21:55 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on May 12, 2011, 03:19:22 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 12, 2011, 02:25:23 PM
After already establishing a certain look for two movies? A much more intimidating one? Yes. It's a continuity issue, and they thought people would just... look right past it. They shouldn't have dumbed them down for that family-fun ending either.

well, in the first movie all the dinos were female, and in the 3rd there were lots of males, it only takes a bit of imagination to say that all the dinos in the second we see up close were female, born female or adolescents that haven't grown into their colours yet, for example.

as for the "family fun" ending, i agree, it's crazy that once they got the eggs back they just ran away, but maybe they just weren't hungry, or had enough food stashed somewhere, they had no reason to attempt to kill the humans, and killing them could have potentially cause retaliation, they were shown to be smart so this all makes sense.

I was under the impression that they ran off at the end because the noise of the helicopter was unfamiliar and scared them off.

^
Once Grant used the raptor throat thing he had to mimic the call for help, they believed the sound of the helicopters was thier reinforcement.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on May 16, 2011, 11:03:26 AM
If you want to know a really pointless scene, try the entire scene with Dr. Grant falling asleep to see the raptor. It spoiled the new design, if anything at all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on May 16, 2011, 11:18:08 AM
yeah, why did they show one of the feathered raptors anyway, he'd never seen one of those before. it was pretty stupid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on May 16, 2011, 11:21:56 AM
It really had no merit as a scene. That's literally my only gripe in the movie, besides the Ceratosaur not wanting to eat because the group smelled of Spinosaur shit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on May 16, 2011, 11:24:40 AM
Quote from: Gate on May 16, 2011, 11:21:56 AM
It really had no merit as a scene. That's literally my only gripe in the movie, besides the Ceratosaur not wanting to eat because the group smelled of Spinosaur shit.

yeah another pointless scene, it's like they wanted to show another intersting looking dino, so he basically just pops up and goes away, so pointless!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on May 16, 2011, 11:29:57 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYxRwS1nJwY# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYxRwS1nJwY#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 16, 2011, 11:42:57 AM
Quote from: AvatarIII on May 16, 2011, 11:18:08 AM
yeah, why did they show one of the feathered raptors anyway, he'd never seen one of those before. it was pretty stupid.

Just a function of the movie. Could've also been a way to hint for the audience that the raptors had evolved into something tortally new.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on May 16, 2011, 11:49:21 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 16, 2011, 11:42:57 AM
Quote from: AvatarIII on May 16, 2011, 11:18:08 AM
yeah, why did they show one of the feathered raptors anyway, he'd never seen one of those before. it was pretty stupid.

Just a function of the movie. Could've also been a way to hint for the audience that the raptors had evolved into something tortally new.

true, but if they'd used the "female" animatronic for that scene, it would have carried more weight both for alan and the viewers who have seen the first 2 movies,
i also wish they had explained why the dinos were coloured and feathered in the movie, like have alan say "it's interesting, the colouring, and the feathers, they must be the males, y'know it's common among birds for the males to look extravagant to attract females,"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 16, 2011, 11:52:10 AM
That's the writer giving the audience too much credit. No way the majority of movie-goers know raptors had feathers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Vecrotus on May 16, 2011, 11:59:53 AM
If there's one thing that I'm looking forward to seeing in a possible sequel is another dinosaur face-off much in the same vein as the Tyrannosaurus vs Spinosaurus scene. The outcome was a disappointment but the actual fight itself was great even if it was a little too short.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on May 16, 2011, 12:00:49 PM
i want to see a Triceratops charge a T-Rex and win.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Vecrotus on May 16, 2011, 12:03:03 PM
That's the one. But I'd prefer if a T-Rex one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on May 16, 2011, 12:21:48 PM
how about if a t rex attacks triceratops, it kills it, but then a few more triceratops come from somewhere, and kill it
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Vecrotus on May 16, 2011, 12:44:11 PM
Sounds good. How about a fight scene between the Spinosaurus and a pack of Velociraptors. It almost made in Jurassic Park 3, so who knows, there's a good chance it could happen again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 16, 2011, 01:54:07 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on May 16, 2011, 12:21:48 PM
how about if a t rex attacks triceratops, it kills it, but then a few more triceratops come from somewhere, and kill it

This is Jurassic Park by Universal, not Asylum Films. Sounds like a cheesy revenge flick.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on May 16, 2011, 02:05:53 PM
how is that description of a scene any worse than the spino/t-rex fight? i wasn't suggesting it be an entire movie, just like a 30 second scene or something
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 16, 2011, 05:04:09 PM
Sounds like a revenge kill to me. Like what, we're going to see a herd of Trikes snorting and fuming, charging a T.Rex, then roaring in victory after it's done? I'm not against the idea of a Rex/Trike fight because it's a classic, but the bit about the herd killing him after sounded weird.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on May 16, 2011, 05:21:56 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 16, 2011, 05:04:09 PM
Sounds like a revenge kill to me. Like what, we're going to see a herd of Trikes snorting and fuming, charging a T.Rex, then roaring in victory after it's done? I'm not against the idea of a Rex/Trike fight because it's a classic, but the bit about the herd killing him after sounded weird.

i thought of it like self defence, like protecting the herd, but i see what you mean,
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Vecrotus on May 16, 2011, 05:33:43 PM
Even so the idea of a Tyrannosaurus vs Triceratops sounds epic. Just look at this epic image, and this is just from the game.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi996.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Faf81%2FVecrotus%2FT-Rex_vs_Trike_JP_Telltale.jpg&hash=88956a5b96336960b09d5a2582258d19d760018b)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 16, 2011, 05:35:31 PM
Jurassic Park V: Electric Boogaloo: The Jurassic Game Has Changed
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on May 16, 2011, 07:34:00 PM
Quote from: Gate on May 16, 2011, 11:29:57 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYxRwS1nJwY# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYxRwS1nJwY#)

lol, the cow.

Man, I loved this game
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 16, 2011, 10:16:34 PM
Quote from: Vecrotus on May 16, 2011, 05:33:43 PM
Even so the idea of a Tyrannosaurus vs Triceratops sounds epic. Just look at this epic image, and this is just from the game.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi996.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Faf81%2FVecrotus%2FT-Rex_vs_Trike_JP_Telltale.jpg&hash=88956a5b96336960b09d5a2582258d19d760018b)

If you've ever seen The Truth About Killer Dinosaurs it actually recreates a Rex/Trike battle based on fossil evidence. Look it up if you haven't. It's really quite good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on May 17, 2011, 05:31:01 AM
No more dinosaur face-offs please.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 17, 2011, 05:35:42 AM
First rule of Jurassic Fight Club: Don't put it in a f**king Jurassic Park movie. ಠ_ಠ
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on May 17, 2011, 05:50:46 AM
Second rule of Jurassic Fight Club: Don't put dream sequences into a Jurassic Park film. Its off putting and out of place.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 17, 2011, 06:06:06 AM
...
Spoiler
ALAN.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on May 17, 2011, 06:10:45 AM
Ugh I hated that scene.
So much. It was just so silly compared to the rest of the film. And that's saying something.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on May 17, 2011, 06:18:49 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 17, 2011, 06:06:06 AM
...
Spoiler
ALAN.
[close]
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture1-1.png&hash=120398da48d178756940ee9cb4cab5e0ecb80056)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on May 17, 2011, 06:27:54 AM
Quote from: Walk Evil Talk on May 17, 2011, 06:18:49 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 17, 2011, 06:06:06 AM
...
Spoiler
ALAN.
[close]
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture1-1.png&hash=120398da48d178756940ee9cb4cab5e0ecb80056)
[close]

That face says it all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on May 17, 2011, 07:18:13 AM
Reaction to script:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp3%2Fs-jp0075.jpg&hash=e413186545e1ba40d91bf67dc0582ff0a7e38b27)


Reaction to paycheck:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp3%2Fs-jp0078.jpg&hash=01ee3cebb406d7e0676e4f9861a22a716498126b)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 17, 2011, 11:17:31 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 17, 2011, 05:35:42 AM
First rule of Jurassic Fight Club: Don't put it in a f**king Jurassic Park movie. ಠ_ಠ

Why not?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DragonBossk on May 17, 2011, 02:02:13 PM
Quote from: Walk Evil Talk on May 17, 2011, 07:18:13 AM
Reaction to script:

http://www.ibiblio.org/samneill/pictures/jp3/s-jp0075.jpg


Reaction to paycheck:

http://www.ibiblio.org/samneill/pictures/jp3/s-jp0078.jpg

Brilliant  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 17, 2011, 02:04:07 PM
Quote from: Walk Evil Talk on May 17, 2011, 07:18:13 AM
Reaction to script:

http://www.ibiblio.org/samneill/pictures/jp3/s-jp0075.jpg


Reaction to paycheck:

http://www.ibiblio.org/samneill/pictures/jp3/s-jp0078.jpg

Very nice.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on May 17, 2011, 02:07:49 PM
Quote from: Walk Evil Talk on May 17, 2011, 07:18:13 AM
Reaction to script:

http://www.ibiblio.org/samneill/pictures/jp3/s-jp0075.jpg


Reaction to paycheck:

http://www.ibiblio.org/samneill/pictures/jp3/s-jp0078.jpg

lol  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 17, 2011, 02:18:45 PM
Quote from: Walk Evil Talk on May 17, 2011, 07:18:13 AM
Reaction to script:

http://www.ibiblio.org/samneill/pictures/jp3/s-jp0075.jpg


Reaction to paycheck:

http://www.ibiblio.org/samneill/pictures/jp3/s-jp0078.jpg

I can't stop f**king laughing! :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 17, 2011, 02:22:20 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp3%2Fs-jp0078.jpg&hash=01ee3cebb406d7e0676e4f9861a22a716498126b)(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gifsoup.com%2Fview1%2F1329507%2Fdexter-shit-eating-grin-o.gif&hash=8ca323c5171e8e06a290cf4b955a90246a72a1ed)(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp3%2Fs-jp0078.jpg&hash=01ee3cebb406d7e0676e4f9861a22a716498126b)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp3%2Fs-jp0078.jpg&hash=01ee3cebb406d7e0676e4f9861a22a716498126b)(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp3%2Fs-jp0078.jpg&hash=01ee3cebb406d7e0676e4f9861a22a716498126b)(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp3%2Fs-jp0078.jpg&hash=01ee3cebb406d7e0676e4f9861a22a716498126b)(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp3%2Fs-jp0078.jpg&hash=01ee3cebb406d7e0676e4f9861a22a716498126b)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on May 17, 2011, 08:00:44 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 17, 2011, 02:22:20 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp3%2Fs-jp0078.jpg&hash=01ee3cebb406d7e0676e4f9861a22a716498126b)(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gifsoup.com%2Fview1%2F1329507%2Fdexter-shit-eating-grin-o.gif&hash=8ca323c5171e8e06a290cf4b955a90246a72a1ed)(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp3%2Fs-jp0078.jpg&hash=01ee3cebb406d7e0676e4f9861a22a716498126b)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp3%2Fs-jp0078.jpg&hash=01ee3cebb406d7e0676e4f9861a22a716498126b)(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp3%2Fs-jp0078.jpg&hash=01ee3cebb406d7e0676e4f9861a22a716498126b)(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp3%2Fs-jp0078.jpg&hash=01ee3cebb406d7e0676e4f9861a22a716498126b)(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp3%2Fs-jp0078.jpg&hash=01ee3cebb406d7e0676e4f9861a22a716498126b)

You win. You just f**king won.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 18, 2011, 03:10:56 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 17, 2011, 02:22:20 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp3%2Fs-jp0078.jpg&hash=01ee3cebb406d7e0676e4f9861a22a716498126b)(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gifsoup.com%2Fview1%2F1329507%2Fdexter-shit-eating-grin-o.gif&hash=8ca323c5171e8e06a290cf4b955a90246a72a1ed)(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp3%2Fs-jp0078.jpg&hash=01ee3cebb406d7e0676e4f9861a22a716498126b)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp3%2Fs-jp0078.jpg&hash=01ee3cebb406d7e0676e4f9861a22a716498126b)(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp3%2Fs-jp0078.jpg&hash=01ee3cebb406d7e0676e4f9861a22a716498126b)(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp3%2Fs-jp0078.jpg&hash=01ee3cebb406d7e0676e4f9861a22a716498126b)(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp3%2Fs-jp0078.jpg&hash=01ee3cebb406d7e0676e4f9861a22a716498126b)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi34.tinypic.com%2Fmubx1w.png&hash=903ac88552d426e18a1e319b197e4c23f8594b5c)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on May 18, 2011, 04:07:32 AM
Sam Neill says that Jurassic Park 4 is dead.

http://worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=21689&count=0 (http://worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=21689&count=0)

"I think we've told the story. I think it's done," he said. "[Legendary effects expert] Stan Winston who made those beautiful dinosaurs died. So, no Stan, no 'Jurassic Park' really... [and author Michael] Crichton died too."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on May 18, 2011, 04:08:52 AM
Quote from: Laufey on May 18, 2011, 04:07:32 AM
Sam Neill says that Jurassic Park 4 is dead.

http://worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=21689&count=0 (http://worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=21689&count=0)

"I think we've told the story. I think it's done," he said. "[Legendary effects expert] Stan Winston who made those beautiful dinosaurs died. So, no Stan, no 'Jurassic Park' really... [and author Michael] Crichton died too."

I think its for the best. No Jurassic Park sequel could ever match the sheer awe and majesty of the original Jurassic Park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on May 18, 2011, 06:33:11 AM
Inb4 they remake it in another 10 or 20 years from now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 18, 2011, 06:34:24 AM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on May 18, 2011, 06:33:11 AM
Inb4
...
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on May 18, 2011, 06:33:11 AM
10 or 20 years from now.

Hardcore.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 18, 2011, 11:01:30 AM
Quote from: Laufey on May 18, 2011, 04:07:32 AM
Sam Neill says that Jurassic Park 4 is dead.

http://worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=21689&count=0 (http://worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=21689&count=0)

"I think we've told the story. I think it's done," he said. "[Legendary effects expert] Stan Winston who made those beautiful dinosaurs died. So, no Stan, no 'Jurassic Park' really... [and author Michael] Crichton died too."

"I think", ergo it's not confirmed. I'll believe it when I hear it from Universal.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on May 18, 2011, 03:20:25 PM
Quote from: Laufey on May 18, 2011, 04:07:32 AM
Sam Neill says that Jurassic Park 4 is dead.

http://worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=21689&count=0 (http://worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=21689&count=0)

"I think we've told the story. I think it's done," he said. "[Legendary effects expert] Stan Winston who made those beautiful dinosaurs died. So, no Stan, no 'Jurassic Park' really... [and author Michael] Crichton died too."

F**K NO!!!  >:(

Don't believe it.  They have actually been working on it this whole time and have been seceretly filming late last year and this year.

We are going to be hit with a teaser trailer one of these days!  I'm telling you!

It's coming out early next year!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 18, 2011, 03:56:20 PM
I want to believe. I don't care about what Neill has to say!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on May 18, 2011, 04:00:57 PM
I'm not so hopeful.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 18, 2011, 04:02:36 PM
Quote from: Ghost Rider on May 18, 2011, 04:00:57 PM
I'm not so hopeful.

I was joking...
To be honest, this project has always been dead. Many people has been saying forever they wanted to do it but not a single f**k was given by Universal. Or at least they just talked about it but did nothing.
I'm sure somebody will pick up this project someday though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on May 18, 2011, 04:04:56 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on May 18, 2011, 04:02:36 PM
Quote from: Ghost Rider on May 18, 2011, 04:00:57 PM
I'm not so hopeful.

I was joking...
To be honest, this project has always been dead. Many people has been saying forever they wanted to do this but not a single f**k was given by Universal. Or at least they just talked about it but did nothing.

Yeah, just let the franchise die. Leave it in peace. I don't think it could bounce back anyway after that s**tstorm of a movie called Jurassic Park III
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 18, 2011, 04:08:18 PM
The worst-case scenario would be a reboot. Unless it follows the novel closely, I don't want to hear anything about rebooting this franchise.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on May 18, 2011, 04:09:49 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on May 18, 2011, 04:08:18 PM
The worst-case scenario would be a reboot. Unless it follows the novel closely, I don't want to hear anything about rebooting this franchise.

Yeah, though I am curious about a reboot. I have a feeling that the CG won't be as good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 18, 2011, 04:49:52 PM
Quote from: Ghost Rider on May 18, 2011, 04:09:49 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on May 18, 2011, 04:08:18 PM
The worst-case scenario would be a reboot. Unless it follows the novel closely, I don't want to hear anything about rebooting this franchise.

Yeah, though I am curious about a reboot. I have a feeling that the CG won't be as good.

You can't top the original movie's mix of animatronics and CGI. Talk about damn realistic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on May 18, 2011, 04:51:40 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on May 18, 2011, 04:49:52 PM
Quote from: Ghost Rider on May 18, 2011, 04:09:49 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on May 18, 2011, 04:08:18 PM
The worst-case scenario would be a reboot. Unless it follows the novel closely, I don't want to hear anything about rebooting this franchise.

Yeah, though I am curious about a reboot. I have a feeling that the CG won't be as good.

You can't top the original movie's mix of animatronics and CGI. Talk about damn realistic.

Indeed. Only time will tell however.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on May 18, 2011, 05:00:29 PM
I'm with Sammy over there. Don't need a fourth.

More dinosaur movies would be nice, though. They're one of the most underutilized tropes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on May 18, 2011, 05:06:58 PM
Jurassic Park cgi love, direct from ILM's website:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture3-4.png&hash=9627483da5924aaac691b9cdb275a945cf967aee)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture4-4.png&hash=4f2e100347c09f0f04eddba9ed7f268c1fd995dd)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture5-3.png&hash=044efbab15238cecd5fe13f25a95565d520db4a3)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture6-3.png&hash=e25096aca3ec611fde7d2447462e0b9066662770)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture9-4.png&hash=77f169e673569673807dae308b46f81036d752f3)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture8-3.png&hash=33a6f8f67180a9eb1df40778346adffcc7563850)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture7-2.png&hash=ea39e1c40c3e2935474aa161853fa629abce4b97)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on May 18, 2011, 05:07:56 PM
Quote from: Walk Evil Talk on May 18, 2011, 05:06:58 PM
Jurassic Park cgi love, direct from ILM's website:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture3-4.png&hash=9627483da5924aaac691b9cdb275a945cf967aee)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture4-4.png&hash=4f2e100347c09f0f04eddba9ed7f268c1fd995dd)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture5-3.png&hash=044efbab15238cecd5fe13f25a95565d520db4a3)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture6-3.png&hash=e25096aca3ec611fde7d2447462e0b9066662770)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture9-4.png&hash=77f169e673569673807dae308b46f81036d752f3)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture8-3.png&hash=33a6f8f67180a9eb1df40778346adffcc7563850)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture7-2.png&hash=ea39e1c40c3e2935474aa161853fa629abce4b97)

Nearly 20 years old and still looking damn good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on May 18, 2011, 05:11:45 PM
Quote from: Walk Evil Talk on May 18, 2011, 05:06:58 PM(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture5-3.png&hash=044efbab15238cecd5fe13f25a95565d520db4a3)
"The point is... you are alive when they start to eat you."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 18, 2011, 05:12:02 PM
Quote(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture6-3.png&hash=e25096aca3ec611fde7d2447462e0b9066662770)

Now THAT is realistic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on May 18, 2011, 05:13:53 PM
Pah. That's not CGI.

Next you'll be telling me flea-circuses are mechanized.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 18, 2011, 05:20:22 PM
Quote from: Walk Evil Talk on May 18, 2011, 05:06:58 PM
Jurassic Park cgi love, direct from ILM's website:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture3-4.png&hash=9627483da5924aaac691b9cdb275a945cf967aee)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture4-4.png&hash=4f2e100347c09f0f04eddba9ed7f268c1fd995dd)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture5-3.png&hash=044efbab15238cecd5fe13f25a95565d520db4a3)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture6-3.png&hash=e25096aca3ec611fde7d2447462e0b9066662770)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture9-4.png&hash=77f169e673569673807dae308b46f81036d752f3)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture8-3.png&hash=33a6f8f67180a9eb1df40778346adffcc7563850)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture7-2.png&hash=ea39e1c40c3e2935474aa161853fa629abce4b97)
Still stunning after all these years. Love those great, great shots.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 18, 2011, 06:02:23 PM
Quote from: Walk Evil Talk on May 18, 2011, 05:06:58 PM
Jurassic Park cgi love, direct from ILM's website:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture3-4.png&hash=9627483da5924aaac691b9cdb275a945cf967aee)

This is the most epic Tyrannosaurus Rex picture in the history of epic Tyrannosaurus Rex pictures. I love hwo the lighting is crashing right over his head.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on May 18, 2011, 06:16:01 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture10-4.png&hash=92670ebd582e6d802065f129ad547ecd89e122cd)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture3-4.png&hash=9627483da5924aaac691b9cdb275a945cf967aee)

Blows my mind, I tell ya.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 18, 2011, 06:21:52 PM
Quote from: Walk Evil Talk on May 18, 2011, 06:16:01 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture3-4.png&hash=9627483da5924aaac691b9cdb275a945cf967aee)
Simply the best. I love that shot so much. Sums up a lot of how I see Jurassic Park.

A fan fiction. One of these days. One of these days.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on May 18, 2011, 06:51:26 PM
As much as I LOVED the original Jurassic Park, I still think it fell utterly short on conveying just how extremely dangerous the Raptors were in comparison to the book. There is NO way those kids would have survived the kitchen encounter.

That being said, I myself have fallen into the filmmakers trap of unrealistically allowing human characters to escape a grisly death via dinos for tension and story progression purposes. In my 'fan film' inspired more by the book, I have a pretty high body count, plenty of gore and viscera, action, chases, etc. And the balls to have a child eaten by a Dinosaur (Thank you Jaws era Spielberg!) But the main characters (for the most part) seem to avoid death because the force is simply 'with them.'

It's a long shot, but a darker, R rated remake would be interesting.

I'm with Sam and Sticks. No number 4. Would rather see a different movie with Dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 18, 2011, 07:11:18 PM
Weird thing is that Universal could make a fourth Jurassic Park film anytime and make a shitload of money... they've delayed it for so long. They've, fundamentally, ignored a gold mine. Jurassic Park is a f**king enormous franchise. It has a gargantuan number of fans worldwide.
I'd love to see it made personally, but realistically, I do not think it is anymore possible.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 18, 2011, 07:16:36 PM
Quote from: Walk Evil Talk on May 18, 2011, 06:16:01 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture10-4.png&hash=92670ebd582e6d802065f129ad547ecd89e122cd)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture3-4.png&hash=9627483da5924aaac691b9cdb275a945cf967aee)

Blows my mind, I tell ya.

Yep. That whole sequence was incredible. Some of today's CGI just can't match this film, and its going on 20 years since its release.

With regards to Winston, he even got the Rex's pupils to dilate on the puppet when Lex shinned the flashlight in front of it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on May 18, 2011, 07:19:57 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 18, 2011, 07:11:18 PM
I'd love to see it made personally, but realistically, I do not think it is anymore possible.

I think there is a better chance of seeing a PG-13 part 4 than an R rated remake. So, take that as a small consolation.

It could still happen for ya Zilla ... just minus 1 Sam Neil, 1 Stan Winston, and 1 Micheal Crichton. But the Jurassic Park legacy is bigger than the sum of it's parts. It just needs the right nurturing from the right creative sources/forces to ensure that the legacy remains viable, or better yet increases it's potency. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on May 18, 2011, 07:38:58 PM
Quote from: Walk Evil Talk on May 18, 2011, 05:06:58 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture5-3.png&hash=044efbab15238cecd5fe13f25a95565d520db4a3)

Oh my god, I never realised how detailed the raptors were, I mean Jesus Christ I feel like I'm looking at a real animal...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: RazorSlash on May 18, 2011, 07:43:19 PM
This is like Gremlins 3. No matter how much you want it, the chances are slim to none
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 18, 2011, 07:46:54 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on May 18, 2011, 07:19:57 PM
It could still happen for ya Zilla ... just minus 1 Sam Neil, 1 Stan Winston, and 1 Micheal Crichton.
I know, that's why I said "I do not think it is anymore possible". Jurassic Park 3 would've been tons better with Crichton's collaboration, something 4 will never have the chance to have if it gets made; it wouldn't have his touch unfortunately. I think though that, while without Stan Winston's direction it wouldn't be the same, I think the new Legacy Fx Studios would still do a pretty damn good job with the practical effects, and The Lost World flowed just fine without Neill, though you just could inflate his paycheck.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on May 18, 2011, 07:56:55 PM
If they were ever to make a fourth I can't see Spielberg returning as director. I wouldn't mind Johnson returning if he tones down the humor, removes dream sequences and makes the on screen jungle look darker, I mean in JP/// it is a bright green whereas the first two JP films the jungles were dark and scary.

Hmm I wonder what J.J Abrams would do with a fourth Jurassic Park film? I mean if Super 8 is as Spielberg-esque as it looks then maybe he could be the man. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on May 18, 2011, 08:01:36 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 18, 2011, 05:20:22 PM
Quote from: Walk Evil Talk on May 18, 2011, 05:06:58 PM
Jurassic Park cgi love, direct from ILM's website:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture3-4.png&hash=9627483da5924aaac691b9cdb275a945cf967aee)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture4-4.png&hash=4f2e100347c09f0f04eddba9ed7f268c1fd995dd)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture5-3.png&hash=044efbab15238cecd5fe13f25a95565d520db4a3)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture6-3.png&hash=e25096aca3ec611fde7d2447462e0b9066662770)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture9-4.png&hash=77f169e673569673807dae308b46f81036d752f3)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture8-3.png&hash=33a6f8f67180a9eb1df40778346adffcc7563850)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture7-2.png&hash=ea39e1c40c3e2935474aa161853fa629abce4b97)
Still stunning after all these years. Love those great, great shots.

It's sad how, even now, movies simply cannot beat the CGI quality presented in JP  ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Le Celticant on May 18, 2011, 08:03:51 PM
That's because it is not CGI...  ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on May 18, 2011, 08:06:59 PM
Quote from: Le Celticant on May 18, 2011, 08:03:51 PM
That's because it is not CGI...  ::)

I actually used to think that they tamed real dinosaurs for the film when I was a kid  :laugh:

Just like how they train bears and tigers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 18, 2011, 08:08:04 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on May 18, 2011, 06:51:26 PM
In my 'fan film' inspired more by the book, I have a pretty high body count, plenty of gore and viscera, action, chases, etc. And the balls to have a child eaten by a Dinosaur (Thank you Jaws era Spielberg!) But the main characters (for the most part) seem to avoid death because the force is simply 'with them.'
Can it be found anywhere on the internet? I seriously want to see this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 18, 2011, 08:23:36 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 18, 2011, 08:01:36 PM
It's sad how, even now, movies simply cannot beat the CGI quality presented in JP  ::)
For real. 90s were the years of CGI. Jurassic Park, The Lost World, Godzilla, Titanic and Men in Black all are f**king great examples of good computer graphics; newer films tend to make cgi with super-quick shots, and it doesn't help but look fake. The prime objective of those great 90s cgi was to make it look real. Dunno if it is used anymore, save some exceptions (D9, Avatar or Outlander).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 18, 2011, 08:26:07 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 18, 2011, 07:11:18 PM
Weird thing is that Universal could make a fourth Jurassic Park film anytime and make a shitload of money... they've delayed it for so long. They've, fundamentally, ignored a gold mine. Jurassic Park is a f**king enormous franchise. It has a gargantuan number of fans worldwide.
I'd love to see it made personally, but realistically, I do not think it is anymore possible.

I think JP 3 killed whatever interest there was. Dinosaurs will always be popular, but JP failed to live up to expectations.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 18, 2011, 08:27:30 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 18, 2011, 08:26:07 PM
I think JP 3 killed whatever interest there was.
Why? It was pretty successful at the box office, and it spawned a lot of merchandise.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on May 18, 2011, 08:42:59 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 18, 2011, 08:27:30 PM
Why? It was pretty successful at the box office, and it spawned a lot of merchandise.

Still royally sucked, and people noticed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 18, 2011, 08:47:05 PM
Quote from: Sharp Sticks on May 18, 2011, 08:42:59 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 18, 2011, 08:27:30 PM
Why? It was pretty successful at the box office, and it spawned a lot of merchandise.

Still royally sucked, and people noticed.
Yeah, like an eight year old me.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fassets0.ordienetworks.com%2Fimages%2Fuser_photos%2F1202246%2Fe9c4149ae6d0da678e4253a9460a7ee6_rectangle_xlarge.png%3F52334423&hash=f7e228ab869bc1499cd2152836b4aba6e2572b19)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 18, 2011, 08:47:47 PM
It was still pretty successful, it sucking royally [as subjective as something can get] or not. 3 didn't kill interest, it increased interest - and as I said, spawned an enormous merchandise. Later Jurassic Park media all feature stuff from the third film, beginning with the Spinosaurus. If it was not successful, and if it universally sucked, why would merchandise force it so much? Wouldn't that decrease sellings and thus make for a very, very unintelligent move?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on May 18, 2011, 08:52:30 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 18, 2011, 08:23:36 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 18, 2011, 08:01:36 PM
It's sad how, even now, movies simply cannot beat the CGI quality presented in JP  ::)
For real. 90s were the years of CGI. Jurassic Park, The Lost World, Godzilla, Titanic and Men in Black all are f**king great examples of good computer graphics; newer films tend to make cgi with super-quick shots, and it doesn't help but look fake. The prime objective of those great 90s cgi was to make it look real. Dunno if it is used anymore, save some exceptions (D9, Avatar or Outlander).

True Dat.

I just hope the CGI for the Hulk in The Avengers will be outstanding.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 18, 2011, 08:55:14 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 18, 2011, 08:47:47 PM
It was still pretty successful, it sucking royally [as subjective as something can get] or not. 3 didn't kill interest, it increased interest - and as I said, spawned an enormous merchandise. Later Jurassic Park media all feature stuff from the third film, beginning with the Spinosaurus. If it was not successful, and if it universally sucked, why would merchandise force it so much? Wouldn't that decrease sellings and thus make for a very, very unintelligent move?
I specifically remember merchandise coming out before the movie. Believe me, I was all over that shit.

So much of it was pre-release that it sort-of makes it's merchandising irrelevant to the movie's actual success.

But goddamnit those Burger King cookies were good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on May 18, 2011, 08:55:28 PM
If the only reason to continue the series is to sell merchandise, I'm twice as out. Were they to announce a fourth movie now the general reaction would probably be complete disdain and complaints about cow-milking. Give us new stuff.

Preferably with dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 18, 2011, 09:04:17 PM
Quote from: Sharp Sticks on May 18, 2011, 08:55:28 PM
Preferably with dinosaurs.
And blud.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on May 18, 2011, 09:07:42 PM
All that blud.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 18, 2011, 09:10:27 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 18, 2011, 08:55:14 PM
I specifically remember merchandise coming out before the movie. Believe me, I was all over that shit.

So much of it was pre-release that it sort-of makes it's merchandising irrelevant to the movie's actual success.
Oh, so was I haha..  ;D I still got a pair of toys from that line.
While  it is true,though, that  a lot of merchandise came in before the actual film (as per the precedent ones), a lot did come out after, too; the Spinosaurus, symbol of the film, is still used a lot in JP media. If JPIII really turned interest off of people, they wouldn't have opened the wound again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 18, 2011, 10:16:19 PM
Hmm...perhaps Terra Nova will be the closest thing to a JP for the time being. Stevie is executive producer and it's bringing the dinos along with Stephen Lang.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on May 18, 2011, 11:05:52 PM
The first Jurassic Park movie is on ABC family right now. They will be playing JP3 next.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on May 18, 2011, 11:25:00 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on May 18, 2011, 11:05:52 PM
The first Jurassic Park movie on ABC family right now. They will be playing JP3 next.

Well that'll be an awkward jump in quality. :laugh:
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 18, 2011, 08:47:05 PM
Quote from: Sharp Sticks on May 18, 2011, 08:42:59 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 18, 2011, 08:27:30 PM
Why? It was pretty successful at the box office, and it spawned a lot of merchandise.

Still royally sucked, and people noticed.

Yeah, like an eight year old me.
http://assets0.ordienetworks.com/images/user_photos/1202246/e9c4149ae6d0da678e4253a9460a7ee6_rectangle_xlarge.png?52334423
If you think thats bad even when I was 6 (was my first and only JP experience in the theatres sadly) I could see all it's problems. Only thing is that I was mostly pissed about the Rex vs Spino scene. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on May 19, 2011, 12:09:58 AM
I'm kind of glad there aren't plans for a JPIV. When I was younger I loved all three, and I can watch all three now for enjoyment, but really, the first one is the only really good one in the series. (The others aren't terrible, just not as good as the first). I really see nowhere for a fourth movie to go without feeling tacked on.

And, I must say, I think the first movie probably has the best score in any movie, ever.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 19, 2011, 12:12:07 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on May 19, 2011, 12:09:58 AM
And, I must say, I think the first movie probably has the best score in any movie, ever.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi47.tinypic.com%2F1zwgn4m.gif&hash=34aab859eb6b425d030381506d0164d8a0033936)

I mean, it's great score and I hummed that more as a kid than I did speak words, but I wouldn't say the best...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on May 19, 2011, 12:19:36 AM
Well, maybe not the best, but very, very close. I love that music. So...so much.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on May 19, 2011, 12:23:02 AM
Quote from: King Rathalos on May 18, 2011, 11:25:00 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on May 18, 2011, 11:05:52 PM
The first Jurassic Park movie on ABC family right now. They will be playing JP3 next.

Well that'll be an awkward jump in quality. :laugh:

I don't know why that they are not playing the second movie?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on May 19, 2011, 12:41:02 AM
ABC Family can only handle so much Ian Malcom.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F28.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_l9c2inxrWF1qzapjfo1_400.jpg&hash=6a0d372494790ee2bce6e45cad8a99d21acf02fb)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 19, 2011, 12:43:20 AM
Pussies.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on May 19, 2011, 02:55:03 AM
Ian Malcolm let himself get attacked by the Tyrannosaur. Just so he had an excuse to open his shirt.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 19, 2011, 05:00:22 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on May 19, 2011, 12:19:36 AM
Well, maybe not the best, but very, very close. I love that music. So...so much.

Definitely. Only other film I can think of that's comparable is Lord of the Rings. Maybe Star Wars, as well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 19, 2011, 05:41:23 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on May 19, 2011, 05:00:22 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on May 19, 2011, 12:19:36 AM
Well, maybe not the best, but very, very close. I love that music. So...so much.

Definitely. Only other film I can think of that's comparable is Lord of the Rings. Maybe Star Wars, as well.
I'd put King Kong up there. Such an incredibly underrated epic score.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on May 19, 2011, 06:40:14 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 18, 2011, 08:08:04 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on May 18, 2011, 06:51:26 PM
In my 'fan film' inspired more by the book, I have a pretty high body count, plenty of gore and viscera, action, chases, etc. And the balls to have a child eaten by a Dinosaur (Thank you Jaws era Spielberg!) But the main characters (for the most part) seem to avoid death because the force is simply 'with them.'
Can it be found anywhere on the internet? I seriously want to see this.

Uploading the first segment to youtube as I type this. I'll guess I'll post it in the fan films section? Then update it as often as I can until the entire film is available. 10-15 minute segments is all it'll let me upload at a time and it takes hours to upload.

Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on May 19, 2011, 12:09:58 AM
And, I must say, I think the first movie probably has the best score in any movie, ever.

It's right up there in my top 20 that's for sure. I learned how to play the main theme on the piano from listening to it over and over again.

Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 19, 2011, 05:41:23 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on May 19, 2011, 05:00:22 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on May 19, 2011, 12:19:36 AM
Well, maybe not the best, but very, very close. I love that music. So...so much.

Definitely. Only other film I can think of that's comparable is Lord of the Rings. Maybe Star Wars, as well.
I'd put King Kong up there. Such an incredibly underrated epic score.

YES! James Newton Howard's Kong score smashed my ears so nice. I used tracks from Jurassic Park, Lost World, King Kong, The Village, Indian Jones & The Last Crusade, Return of the Jedi, and Predator 2 in the fan film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 19, 2011, 06:45:22 AM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on May 19, 2011, 06:40:14 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 18, 2011, 08:08:04 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on May 18, 2011, 06:51:26 PM
In my 'fan film' inspired more by the book, I have a pretty high body count, plenty of gore and viscera, action, chases, etc. And the balls to have a child eaten by a Dinosaur (Thank you Jaws era Spielberg!) But the main characters (for the most part) seem to avoid death because the force is simply 'with them.'
Can it be found anywhere on the internet? I seriously want to see this.

Uploading the first segment to youtube as I type this. I'll guess I'll post it in the fan films section? Then update it as often as I can until the entire film is available. 10-15 minute segments is all it'll let me upload at a time and it takes hours to upload.

Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 19, 2011, 05:41:23 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on May 19, 2011, 05:00:22 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on May 19, 2011, 12:19:36 AM
Well, maybe not the best, but very, very close. I love that music. So...so much.

Definitely. Only other film I can think of that's comparable is Lord of the Rings. Maybe Star Wars, as well.
I'd put King Kong up there. Such an incredibly underrated epic score.

YES! James Newton Howard's Kong score smashed my ears so nice. I used tracks from Jurassic Park, Lost World, King Kong, The Village, Indian Jones & The Last Crusade, Return of the Jedi, and Predator 2 in the fan film.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs3.amazonaws.com%2Fkym-assets%2Fphotos%2Fimages%2Foriginal%2F000%2F107%2F708%2Ftumblr_liebpzbCOv1qdkf2k.gif%3F1300698033&hash=1a443b8660405a2a1946db7899d4f38236377f27)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 19, 2011, 08:40:30 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 19, 2011, 06:45:22 AM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on May 19, 2011, 06:40:14 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 18, 2011, 08:08:04 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on May 18, 2011, 06:51:26 PM
In my 'fan film' inspired more by the book, I have a pretty high body count, plenty of gore and viscera, action, chases, etc. And the balls to have a child eaten by a Dinosaur (Thank you Jaws era Spielberg!) But the main characters (for the most part) seem to avoid death because the force is simply 'with them.'
Can it be found anywhere on the internet? I seriously want to see this.

Uploading the first segment to youtube as I type this. I'll guess I'll post it in the fan films section? Then update it as often as I can until the entire film is available. 10-15 minute segments is all it'll let me upload at a time and it takes hours to upload.

Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 19, 2011, 05:41:23 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on May 19, 2011, 05:00:22 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on May 19, 2011, 12:19:36 AM
Well, maybe not the best, but very, very close. I love that music. So...so much.

Definitely. Only other film I can think of that's comparable is Lord of the Rings. Maybe Star Wars, as well.
I'd put King Kong up there. Such an incredibly underrated epic score.

YES! James Newton Howard's Kong score smashed my ears so nice. I used tracks from Jurassic Park, Lost World, King Kong, The Village, Indian Jones & The Last Crusade, Return of the Jedi, and Predator 2 in the fan film.
http://s3.amazonaws.com/kym-assets/photos/images/original/000/107/708/tumblr_liebpzbCOv1qdkf2k.gif?1300698033

:D :D :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 19, 2011, 12:05:32 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 18, 2011, 09:10:27 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 18, 2011, 08:55:14 PM
I specifically remember merchandise coming out before the movie. Believe me, I was all over that shit.

So much of it was pre-release that it sort-of makes it's merchandising irrelevant to the movie's actual success.
Oh, so was I haha..  ;D I still got a pair of toys from that line.
While  it is true,though, that  a lot of merchandise came in before the actual film (as per the precedent ones), a lot did come out after, too; the Spinosaurus, symbol of the film, is still used a lot in JP media. If JPIII really turned interest off of people, they wouldn't have opened the wound again.

How long did that merchandise last for though? I haven't seen any sort of JP-related merchandise for sale since...geez, I think 2002.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 19, 2011, 12:14:46 PM
I don't really know, I remember something like 3 or 4 games including Operation Genesis, some sporadic toy lines. I distinctly remember one from 2009. Oh, and the Papo toys. A lot of them are, practically, the Jurassic Park Dinosaurs (including the Spinosaurus).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 19, 2011, 12:20:36 PM
Operation Genesis came out in 2003, if I'm not mistaken. And being "practically" JP dinosaurs is not the same thing. The design may be similar, but if it's not the same franchise, then it doesn't count.

The latest development we have as far as JP media is concerned is the TT game Jurassic Park which does look very promising. Who knows, maybe that could re-ignite interest.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 19, 2011, 12:36:38 PM
I think PAPO toys got some rights. I mean, look:
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimage.rakuten.co.jp%2Fare-sore%2Fcabinet%2Fpapo01%2Fpp-55001-03.jpg&hash=b86830a6b8d50493799e9d36ff7ddf9a462f4270)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tyrano.co.kr%2Fshop%2Fdata%2F1%2Fm1_papo_spino_0.gif&hash=92e447b71cf26e52812dae3f1f35bd1897832cc9)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on May 19, 2011, 02:43:03 PM
Quote from: Walk Evil Talk on May 19, 2011, 12:41:02 AM
ABC Family can only handle so much Ian Malcom.

http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l9c2inxrWF1qzapjfo1_400.jpg

lmao
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on May 19, 2011, 02:47:18 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on May 19, 2011, 06:40:14 AM
Uploading the first segment to youtube as I type this. I'll guess I'll post it in the fan films section? Then update it as often as I can until the entire film is available. 10-15 minute segments is all it'll let me upload at a time and it takes hours to upload.

yehhehehehesss
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 19, 2011, 05:17:08 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 19, 2011, 12:36:38 PM
I think PAPO toys got some rights. I mean, look:
http://image.rakuten.co.jp/are-sore/cabinet/papo01/pp-55001-03.jpg
http://www.tyrano.co.kr/shop/data/1/m1_papo_spino_0.gif

You think they got the rights. Granted the looks are too similar to ignore but if you don't know for sure...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 19, 2011, 05:44:19 PM
Yeah... and if the looks are similar, that means PAPO thinks those looks sell, rights or not. And Spinosauurs being there reconnects to what I am saying.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on May 19, 2011, 06:12:57 PM
Quote from: Sharp Sticks on May 19, 2011, 02:47:18 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on May 19, 2011, 06:40:14 AM
Uploading the first segment to youtube as I type this. I'll guess I'll post it in the fan films section? Then update it as often as I can until the entire film is available. 10-15 minute segments is all it'll let me upload at a time and it takes hours to upload.

yehhehehehesss

First episode is up in Fan Films.

http://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=38839.0 (http://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=38839.0)

Looks like it's going to be in about 9 parts. Get some popcorn out. Sorry about the cliff hangers (and the bad acting!)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space_Dementia on May 20, 2011, 12:31:38 AM
Im looking forward to it, love the movies, Jurassic Park was the first movie I ever watched at the cinema, so it will always hold a special place in my heart.  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 20, 2011, 01:31:26 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 19, 2011, 05:44:19 PM
Yeah... and if the looks are similar, that means PAPO thinks those looks sell, rights or not. And Spinosauurs being there reconnects to what I am saying.

In any case, the interest isn't there. It's not at the level it used to be. When JP and TLW were released, it was as if nothing else mattered.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on May 20, 2011, 06:31:42 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 20, 2011, 01:31:26 AM
it was as if nothing else mattered.

I never let go of that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 20, 2011, 10:33:26 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 20, 2011, 01:31:26 AM
In any case, the interest isn't there.
Disagreed. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 20, 2011, 02:51:59 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 20, 2011, 10:33:26 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 20, 2011, 01:31:26 AM
In any case, the interest isn't there.
Disagreed. :P
Generally helps your side of the argument to respond as to why you disagree.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 20, 2011, 03:50:24 PM
Nooo, really?
/trollololol

But seriously, I'm aware of that. I've already said why I disagree. Maybe I exaggerated a bit with the term 'increase', that's it.
(Also depends on what 'interest' we are talking about here. From the public there's still a lot of interest, Jurassic Park 4 was always first or second in the countless polls about demanded sequels for example, and that's the interest I disagree about being absent, filmmakers seem not to care)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 20, 2011, 05:53:56 PM
I didn't even know polls were conducted as such. Where did you see this?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 20, 2011, 06:37:49 PM
Sites such as ComingSoon.net, there were a load of votes for Jurassic Park 4. Other really demanded sequels were Spider-Man 4 and Pirates of the Caribbean 4 (which are getting made more or less, the former in the form of a reboot and the latter is currently in cinemas). Those polls have been taken down unfortunately, but have been repeated over time; always with similar results.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 21, 2011, 04:45:05 AM
If the writers don't care, then the studio doesn't think there's enough interest to warrant funding a movie. The others movie are being made because the studio knows those will always sell. JP 3 was such a let down that they don't want to gamble on a 4th.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 21, 2011, 06:13:40 AM
That is the weird thing. There's an enormous interest on the public part yet the filmmakers don't give a crap. Only Johnston gave a word on it some time ago.
It's like the fourth Indiana Jones IMHO.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 22, 2011, 04:16:19 AM
Indy Jones has been around longer though. It has more fans.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on May 22, 2011, 08:48:11 AM
This was my first Jurassic park toy back in 1993 and I still have it today.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jptoys.com%2Ftoy-database%2Fjurassic-park%2Fjurassic-park-series-1%2Fdinosaurs%2Felectronic-raptor%2Fimg%2Felecraptor.jpg&hash=13914543347121a2bd2b25e8c9123d8aedbe64ea)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on May 22, 2011, 09:55:42 AM
These two I remember having:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimageshack.us%2Fm%2F835%2F7189%2Fskinner4.jpg&hash=1e245e141bea0059b217f3659c645e4920a363fd)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimageshack.us%2Fm%2F585%2F7972%2Fraptorwd.jpg&hash=bd6678317c687780d201b90ab1e2871b09cfdc32)

And I'm pretty sure I had this one as well, can't be sure though.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimageshack.us%2Fm%2F191%2F717%2Ftriceratopsdinosaurtoys.jpg&hash=b6989f2db21cee5cf7687debf5f4a653a5ea0470)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: jhsnake999 on May 22, 2011, 11:14:33 AM
I have this guy, I wanted him so bad when I was little and nine years later, I have him!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dinotoyblog.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2010%2F12%2FJP-TLW-Thrasher-Rex3-700x551.jpg&hash=94a919e4547640c7d809dc95eb6d1c1ef82456b4)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 22, 2011, 02:33:54 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 22, 2011, 08:48:11 AM
This was my first Jurassic park toy back in 1993 and I still have it today.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jptoys.com%2Ftoy-database%2Fjurassic-park%2Fjurassic-park-series-1%2Fdinosaurs%2Felectronic-raptor%2Fimg%2Felecraptor.jpg&hash=13914543347121a2bd2b25e8c9123d8aedbe64ea)

Used to have that :( no clue what happened to it.

Quote from: Laufey on May 22, 2011, 09:55:42 AM
http://imageshack.us/m/585/7972/raptorwd.jpg

And I'm pretty sure I had this one as well, can't be sure though.

http://imageshack.us/m/191/717/triceratopsdinosaurtoys.jpg

Still have both, though the raptor doesn't have the restraints and the Trike is missing the dino damage piece.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 22, 2011, 03:15:06 PM
I've quite a bunch of JP/TLW toys.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on May 22, 2011, 03:47:39 PM
I've got the raptor, albeit with no restraints, that Sha- Laufey posted
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on May 22, 2011, 04:20:00 PM
Quote from: jhsnake999 on May 22, 2011, 11:14:33 AM
I have this guy, I wanted him so bad when I was little and nine years later, I have him!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dinotoyblog.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2010%2F12%2FJP-TLW-Thrasher-Rex3-700x551.jpg&hash=94a919e4547640c7d809dc95eb6d1c1ef82456b4)

I still have that one, too. And I wanted to get the big Spino like that to make them fight.

I have a huge box full of JP toys! Lots of people, vehicles, DINOS! Used to love them so much. Those, my Star Wars figures, and my Legos.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on May 22, 2011, 04:39:45 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on May 22, 2011, 04:20:00 PM
Quote from: jhsnake999 on May 22, 2011, 11:14:33 AM
I have this guy, I wanted him so bad when I was little and nine years later, I have him!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dinotoyblog.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2010%2F12%2FJP-TLW-Thrasher-Rex3-700x551.jpg&hash=94a919e4547640c7d809dc95eb6d1c1ef82456b4)

I still have that one, too. And I wanted to get the big Spino like that to make them fight.

I have a huge box full of JP toys! Lots of people, vehicles, DINOS! Used to love them so much.

same here!

After 10 years of searching, I finally ran into this bad boy at a flee market.....

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jptoys.com%2Ftoy-database%2Flost-world%2Flost-world-series-1%2Fvehicles%2Fmcc%2Fimg%2Fmcc2.jpg&hash=d42de072f4265c10437ec7d58545f4bdf08fdec2)

MAN I LOVE THAT TRAILER!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 22, 2011, 04:41:46 PM
Shit, that's cool.
As a kid I desired all time to own the Trailer from the film haha.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on May 22, 2011, 04:49:23 PM
There's an old toy store in a nearby town that still have some Jurassic Park toys in the window. Unopened stuff, that is. I think I'll give it a look next time I pass by, might even find some of those dinos one wanted as a kid. It certainly would have a high nostalgic value these days.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on May 22, 2011, 05:23:11 PM
I used to have these.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jurassicparktoys.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2010%2F07%2FJurassic-Park-III-Pack-Raptor-Electronic.jpg&hash=46b6a23803433e6d78a6e9f03d5b2690c8c65663)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ftoyarchive.com%2FSTAForSale%2FNEW2001%2B%2FJurassicPark%2FJurassicPark3%2FJP3SmallTyrannosaurusLoose1a.jpg&hash=9509897fe03cdef03c484b5c093b464e80f0009b)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ftoyarchive.com%2FSTAForSale%2FNEW2001%2B%2FJurassicPark%2FJurassicPark3%2FJP3SpinosaurusRegLoose1a.jpg&hash=86be81a9aabf16618758a2ca5894907039203897)

To this day I'm still pissed about the day I lost them. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 22, 2011, 05:25:35 PM
I have that Tyrannosaurus too! My brother broke its tail once. And I think I have a Raptor similar to that, only it had those... 'battle damages' and a different color scheme.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on May 22, 2011, 05:26:07 PM
I never had any licensed JP toys. All my dinosaurs were the kind you'd get at little family-run toy stores, basically just miniature statues with the name of the dinosaur stamped across the belly.

I loved those guys.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on May 22, 2011, 07:13:16 PM
I had those too Sticks. The bargain bin dinos and other assorted monsters. All made in China.

My best friend's little bro had all the original JP Toys.  They didn't get along with others at all.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvPXCZKBZQU# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvPXCZKBZQU#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on May 22, 2011, 07:17:05 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on May 22, 2011, 07:13:16 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvPXCZKBZQU# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvPXCZKBZQU#)

Pure cinema.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Purebreedalien on May 22, 2011, 07:43:06 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on May 22, 2011, 05:23:11 PM
I used to have these.
http://www.jurassicparktoys.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Jurassic-Park-III-Pack-Raptor-Electronic.jpg
http://toyarchive.com/STAForSale/NEW2001+/JurassicPark/JurassicPark3/JP3SmallTyrannosaurusLoose1a.jpg
http://toyarchive.com/STAForSale/NEW2001+/JurassicPark/JurassicPark3/JP3SpinosaurusRegLoose1a.jpg

To this day I'm still pissed about the day I lost them. :laugh:

I had that Spino and the Raptor. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nope on May 22, 2011, 07:45:11 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on May 22, 2011, 05:23:11 PM
I used to have these.
http://www.jurassicparktoys.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Jurassic-Park-III-Pack-Raptor-Electronic.jpg
http://toyarchive.com/STAForSale/NEW2001+/JurassicPark/JurassicPark3/JP3SmallTyrannosaurusLoose1a.jpg
http://toyarchive.com/STAForSale/NEW2001+/JurassicPark/JurassicPark3/JP3SpinosaurusRegLoose1a.jpg

To this day I'm still pissed about the day I lost them. :laugh:
I had the T-rex, and a JP3 raptor that looked different then that one. And a pturradactyl.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on May 22, 2011, 07:47:00 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 22, 2011, 04:39:45 PM
After 10 years of searching, I finally ran into this bad boy at a flee market.....

http://www.jptoys.com/toy-database/lost-world/lost-world-series-1/vehicles/mcc/img/mcc2.jpg

MAN I LOVE THAT TRAILER!!!

I used to own that as well! Along with a Robert Muldoon figure that I cherished.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 22, 2011, 08:17:18 PM
Motherfckin' Roland Tembo, I own it:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Faznbadger.files.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F01%2Frolandtembolooseinc2a.jpg&hash=692b635de660ec1c9d4da7d8220c19cd8360b624)

top that
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on May 22, 2011, 08:24:01 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on May 22, 2011, 08:17:18 PM
Motherfckin' Roland Tembo, I own it:

http://aznbadger.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/rolandtembolooseinc2a.jpg

top that
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.actiontoys.com%2FMerchant2%2Fgraphics%2F00000001%2FBULLTREX.jpg&hash=c2f0b2a3e0b5c1e035c4d60a77ee37575baa9201)

Boom.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 22, 2011, 08:29:34 PM
I see your T-Rex and I pull out my:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.actiontoys.com%2FMerchant2%2Fgraphics%2F00000001%2FGODMOV-10.jpg&hash=7585a699c22096c0b7b77b188b12e58f5cb89273)

This fcker still roars. Never had to change the first batteries. 8)

I'm so making a toy nostalgia thread.

EDIT: Done! http://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=38865.0 (http://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=38865.0)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on May 22, 2011, 08:40:14 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on May 22, 2011, 08:29:34 PM
I see your T-Rex and I pull out my:

http://www.actiontoys.com/Merchant2/graphics/00000001/GODMOV-10.jpg

This fcker still roars. Never had to change the first batteries. 8)

I'm so making a toy nostalgia thread.

EDIT: Done! http://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=38865.0 (http://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=38865.0)

I love you for that... :o :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 22, 2011, 08:44:49 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on May 22, 2011, 08:29:34 PM
I see your T-Rex and I pull out my:

http://www.actiontoys.com/Merchant2/graphics/00000001/GODMOV-10.jpg

This fcker still roars. Never had to change the first batteries. 8)
Oshit, do want! That's incredibly awesome. Wish I had it as a kid haha.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on May 22, 2011, 09:33:59 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 22, 2011, 08:44:49 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on May 22, 2011, 08:29:34 PM
I see your T-Rex and I pull out my:

http://www.actiontoys.com/Merchant2/graphics/00000001/GODMOV-10.jpg

This fcker still roars. Never had to change the first batteries. 8)
Oshit, do want! That's incredibly awesome. Wish I had it as a kid haha.

I actually still have two of those.  One still works.  The other is missing parts.  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Huol on May 22, 2011, 09:40:23 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.ebayimg.com%2F17%2F%21CFo1U%21wBmk%7E%24%28KGrHqR%2C%21joE1J2Lt%21QyBNVwRw4U9Q%7E%7E0_35.JPG&hash=08797721c476e56fcb41b09f4516b3aaeaaf233b)

I had half a dinosaur.
Woo.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on May 22, 2011, 09:41:13 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on May 22, 2011, 04:41:46 PM
Shit, that's cool.
As a kid I desired all time to own the Trailer from the film haha.

lol.  Same here; for camping trips.

That'll be a bitch to drive!  Might as well drive a train through the jungle foilage!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on May 22, 2011, 09:41:39 PM
Quote from: Huol on May 22, 2011, 09:40:23 PM
http://i.ebayimg.com/17/!CFo1U!wBmk~$(KGrHqR,!joE1J2Lt!QyBNVwRw4U9Q~~0_35.JPG

I had half a dinosaur.
Woo.
I got stuck with the other half...  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 22, 2011, 10:20:28 PM
Quote from: Walk Evil Talk on May 22, 2011, 08:24:01 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on May 22, 2011, 08:17:18 PM
Motherfckin' Roland Tembo, I own it:

http://aznbadger.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/rolandtembolooseinc2a.jpg

top that
http://www.actiontoys.com/Merchant2/graphics/00000001/BULLTREX.jpg

Boom.

Quote from: scarhunter92 on May 22, 2011, 08:29:34 PM
I see your T-Rex and I pull out my:

http://www.actiontoys.com/Merchant2/graphics/00000001/GODMOV-10.jpg

This fcker still roars. Never had to change the first batteries. 8)

I'm so making a toy nostalgia thread.

EDIT: Done! http://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=38865.0 (http://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=38865.0)

I still have both ;D sans T.Rex accessories.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on May 23, 2011, 12:41:43 AM
Quote from: Walk Evil Talk on May 22, 2011, 08:24:01 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on May 22, 2011, 08:17:18 PM
Motherfckin' Roland Tembo, I own it:

http://aznbadger.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/rolandtembolooseinc2a.jpg

top that
http://www.actiontoys.com/Merchant2/graphics/00000001/BULLTREX.jpg

Boom.

I had that. I miss it. :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on May 23, 2011, 12:43:55 AM
Quote from: Huol on May 22, 2011, 09:40:23 PM
http://i.ebayimg.com/17/!CFo1U!wBmk~$(KGrHqR,!joE1J2Lt!QyBNVwRw4U9Q~~0_35.JPG

I had half a dinosaur.
Woo.

Still have it. Love it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TheMonolith on May 23, 2011, 12:47:36 AM
Quote from: Walk Evil Talk on May 22, 2011, 08:24:01 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on May 22, 2011, 08:17:18 PM
Motherfckin' Roland Tembo, I own it:

http://aznbadger.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/rolandtembolooseinc2a.jpg

top that
http://www.actiontoys.com/Merchant2/graphics/00000001/BULLTREX.jpg

Boom.
I still have that.
Quote from: Huol on May 22, 2011, 09:40:23 PM
http://i.ebayimg.com/17/!CFo1U!wBmk~$(KGrHqR,!joE1J2Lt!QyBNVwRw4U9Q~~0_35.JPG

I had half a dinosaur.
Woo.
I remember those. Hours of entertainment. I loved the had puppet most of all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 23, 2011, 02:45:30 AM
Quote from: Sharp Sticks on May 23, 2011, 12:43:55 AM
Quote from: Huol on May 22, 2011, 09:40:23 PM
http://i.ebayimg.com/17/!CFo1U!wBmk~$(KGrHqR,!joE1J2Lt!QyBNVwRw4U9Q~~0_35.JPG

I had half a dinosaur.
Woo.

Still have it. Love it.

I have the raptor puppet, except the circuits are all fried >:(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 02, 2011, 12:46:06 AM
I made a video today about all the Jurassic Park stuff I have. Enjoy  :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jun 02, 2011, 12:55:10 AM
Quote from: Sharp Sticks on May 22, 2011, 07:17:05 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on May 22, 2011, 07:13:16 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvPXCZKBZQU# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvPXCZKBZQU#)

Pure cinema.
We had a pact.

ಠ_ಠ,
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on Jun 02, 2011, 12:57:30 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Jun 02, 2011, 12:55:10 AM
We had a pact.

ಠ_ಠ,
auuuuugh

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.playtime-magazine.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2009%2F05%2Fblackhole95.jpg&hash=97a45dc819aaf26bc4916bf151d58d8659b463e6)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 02, 2011, 01:06:37 AM
What are you guys talkin' about? Pacts? Secret packs? Raptor worship?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ui_ai_rxEtI#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ui_ai_rxEtI#ws)

Not mine. But Jesus. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on Jun 02, 2011, 01:15:27 AM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 02, 2011, 01:06:37 AM
What are you guys talkin' about? Pacts? Secret packs? Raptor worship?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ui_ai_rxEtI#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ui_ai_rxEtI#ws)

Not mine. But Jesus.

PURE CINEMAUUUUUUUUGUUH
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 02, 2011, 01:18:47 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 02, 2011, 12:46:06 AM
I made a video today about all the Jurassic Park stuff I have. Enjoy  :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws)

I. BOW. to you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jun 02, 2011, 01:24:52 AM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 02, 2011, 01:06:37 AM
What are you guys talkin' about? Pacts? Secret packs? Raptor worship?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ui_ai_rxEtI#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ui_ai_rxEtI#ws)

Not mine. But Jesus.
:laugh:

That was unbelievably awesome.

-------------------------------------

Anyways, I had a Jurassic Park dream last night; it had lots of intensity and lots of comedy in it-- and Alison Brie!

I'll probably write a basic layout of how it went in the Dream Thread soon, and I've already added it to my list of dreams I intend on turning into short stories. Too much fun, that one was.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on Jun 02, 2011, 01:32:11 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Jun 02, 2011, 01:24:52 AM
and Alison Brie!

Godspeed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jun 02, 2011, 01:37:57 AM
Best dream in a month.  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 02, 2011, 04:21:55 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 02, 2011, 12:46:06 AM
I made a video today about all the Jurassic Park stuff I have. Enjoy  :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.sodahead.com%2Fimages%2Fprofiles%2F0%2F0%2F0%2F9%2F9%2F8%2F7%2F1%2F1%2Fprofiles_unseenposter_5143_583394.jpeg&hash=48d33eafe0b0a6f01e5b94dfc5a30c5b94aa4e42)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jun 02, 2011, 04:25:33 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 02, 2011, 12:46:06 AM
I made a video today about all the Jurassic Park stuff I have. Enjoy  :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws)
Just saw this now.

Ho-ly shyiiiiit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jun 02, 2011, 04:42:15 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 02, 2011, 12:46:06 AM
I made a video today about all the Jurassic Park stuff I have. Enjoy  :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws)

That's where Hammond's gift shop went...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 02, 2011, 04:46:55 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 02, 2011, 04:21:55 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 02, 2011, 12:46:06 AM
I made a video today about all the Jurassic Park stuff I have. Enjoy  :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.sodahead.com%2Fimages%2Fprofiles%2F0%2F0%2F0%2F9%2F9%2F8%2F7%2F1%2F1%2Fprofiles_unseenposter_5143_583394.jpeg&hash=48d33eafe0b0a6f01e5b94dfc5a30c5b94aa4e42)

Not sure you'd want to unsee it lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on Jun 02, 2011, 05:32:50 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 02, 2011, 12:46:06 AM
I made a video today about all the Jurassic Park stuff I have. Enjoy  :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws)
At first I thought this was just going to be a toy collection. I'm surprised you don't have Richard Attenborough in your closet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 02, 2011, 10:23:52 AM
Quote from: Bad Replicant on Jun 02, 2011, 05:32:50 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 02, 2011, 12:46:06 AM
I made a video today about all the Jurassic Park stuff I have. Enjoy  :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws)
At first I thought this was just going to be a toy collection. I'm surprised you don't have Richard Attenborough in your closet.

Or do I?  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Jun 02, 2011, 10:52:40 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 02, 2011, 12:46:06 AM
I made a video today about all the Jurassic Park stuff I have. Enjoy  :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws)
Great video, I feel so nostalgic seeing all of that, especially the "Making of The Lost World" VHS. I had totally forgotten about that until I saw it in your video. :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on Jun 02, 2011, 11:42:31 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 02, 2011, 10:23:52 AM
Quote from: Bad Replicant on Jun 02, 2011, 05:32:50 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 02, 2011, 12:46:06 AM
I made a video today about all the Jurassic Park stuff I have. Enjoy  :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws)
At first I thought this was just going to be a toy collection. I'm surprised you don't have Richard Attenborough in your closet.
Or do I?  8)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi930.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fad141%2Fcmontaro%2FSeinfeld%2520GIFs%2FKramer_Shocked.gif&hash=b4f629d9e68f5e55c2a21987e321b9d18adb2c82)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 02, 2011, 04:31:36 PM
Quote from: Bad Replicant on Jun 02, 2011, 11:42:31 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 02, 2011, 10:23:52 AM
Quote from: Bad Replicant on Jun 02, 2011, 05:32:50 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 02, 2011, 12:46:06 AM
I made a video today about all the Jurassic Park stuff I have. Enjoy  :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws)
At first I thought this was just going to be a toy collection. I'm surprised you don't have Richard Attenborough in your closet.
Or do I?  8)
http://i930.photobucket.com/albums/ad141/cmontaro/Seinfeld%20GIFs/Kramer_Shocked.gif

I spared no expense.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 02, 2011, 07:53:13 PM
Revoltech The Lost World Tyrannosaurus has been freed of all the copyright issues!
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.toyark.com%2Fnews%2Fattach%2F1%2F9%2F9%2F9%2FTyrannosaurus-Rex-Revoltech-Lost-World-2_1305891807.jpg&hash=57cb4255ead5cf8bd3e4ece105c7223187baa25d)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 02, 2011, 11:41:56 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jun 02, 2011, 07:53:13 PM
Revoltech The Lost World Tyrannosaurus has been freed of all the copyright issues!
http://www.toyark.com/news/attach/1/9/9/9/Tyrannosaurus-Rex-Revoltech-Lost-World-2_1305891807.jpg

Wait, this is coming out soon?  I'm confused.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2011, 12:40:52 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jun 02, 2011, 07:53:13 PM
Revoltech The Lost World Tyrannosaurus has been freed of all the copyright issues!
http://www.toyark.com/news/attach/1/9/9/9/Tyrannosaurus-Rex-Revoltech-Lost-World-2_1305891807.jpg

That looks odd.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Jun 03, 2011, 01:30:53 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jun 02, 2011, 07:53:13 PM
Revoltech The Lost World Tyrannosaurus has been freed of all the copyright issues!
http://www.toyark.com/news/attach/1/9/9/9/Tyrannosaurus-Rex-Revoltech-Lost-World-2_1305891807.jpg

Looks kinda neat.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on Jun 03, 2011, 01:39:54 AM
Revolt-eck, indeed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 03, 2011, 11:52:33 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 02, 2011, 11:41:56 PM
Wait, this is coming out soon?  I'm confused.
It's already out as that is a 'in-hand' picture. Dunno where though.
More pics here (http://tokusatsurevoltech.com/series029/).

Quote from: Sharp Sticks on Jun 03, 2011, 01:39:54 AM
Revolt-eck, indeed.
Don't you dare!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Jun 03, 2011, 01:31:23 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 02, 2011, 04:31:36 PM
Quote from: Bad Replicant on Jun 02, 2011, 11:42:31 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 02, 2011, 10:23:52 AM
Quote from: Bad Replicant on Jun 02, 2011, 05:32:50 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 02, 2011, 12:46:06 AM
I made a video today about all the Jurassic Park stuff I have. Enjoy  :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws)
At first I thought this was just going to be a toy collection. I'm surprised you don't have Richard Attenborough in your closet.
Or do I?  8)
http://i930.photobucket.com/albums/ad141/cmontaro/Seinfeld%20GIFs/Kramer_Shocked.gif

I spared no expense.

:D i heard that in ricky's voice and everything!! :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2011, 02:48:10 PM
Quote from: Sharp Sticks on Jun 03, 2011, 01:39:54 AM
Revolt-eck, indeed.

What he said. Why does this Rex have a hunch in his neck?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 03, 2011, 04:43:59 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2011, 02:48:10 PM
Quote from: Sharp Sticks on Jun 03, 2011, 01:39:54 AM
Revolt-eck, indeed.

What he said. Why does this Rex have a hunch in his neck?

He swallowed a baby Spinosaurus.

I dig the concept of these 'Rolvotech' toys ... ratcheted joints ... fun for stop animation. But they are waaay to small for me, and on the expensive side.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jun 03, 2011, 09:46:12 PM
I like it. Aside from the joints, it's a pretty damn accurate model to what we've seen on film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 04, 2011, 05:15:11 PM
I don't remember the Rex being coloured like vomit or having an arched neck.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 04, 2011, 05:37:51 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 04, 2011, 05:15:11 PM
I don't remember the Rex being coloured like vomit or having an arched neck.

I was never under the impression that it was supposed to 'be' the T-Rex from Jurassic Park. If the toy ran into licensing issues because of design similarities or marketing intrusion, well that's another story.

As far as the color ... no body knows what color they were. They could have been ferruginous and fuchsia for anyone knows.

And that hunch ... This isn't the first time I've seen it. It pops up in some of the more modern and artistic renderings in varying degrees of pronouncement. Doesn't make or break the figure in my opinion.

But if it is supposed to be an officially licensed JP figure ... it's not film accurate.   
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 04, 2011, 07:42:43 PM
Dunno about the hunch you guys are talking about... it's largely the same in the real design.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fnomorepopcorn.files.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F12%2Fjurassic-park.jpg&hash=c469808e625b1761d9bdfb8162d3b95b96ff0859)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjurassicpark%2Fjppi%2Fjppi2.jpg&hash=acad5eb48096acb9a7143ff1b2e5b3595a3c7347)
Dunno how the color scheme of the figure resembles vomit, either. It's based on the The Lost World Male configuration. Looks pretty damn accurate to me, apart from the joints which are... the trademark of Revoltech. Only thing I don't like of it is that the toe claws don't touch the ground. But that's minor.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 04, 2011, 08:49:27 PM
The arch in the neck is more pronounced in the figure. And the colour scheme to me is lousy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: jhsnake999 on Jun 04, 2011, 09:46:38 PM
Wow, I want this Tyrannosaurus figure. Maybe Revoltech will make Raptors too or a Dilophosaurs?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 04, 2011, 10:00:57 PM
Haha, hopefully.  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 04, 2011, 10:07:33 PM
Or, um...

...a Graboid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 04, 2011, 10:09:37 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 04, 2011, 10:07:33 PM
Or, um...

...a Graboid.
And a Shrieker.
Aaaand an AB.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 04, 2011, 10:19:11 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jun 04, 2011, 10:09:37 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 04, 2011, 10:07:33 PM
Or, um...

...a Graboid.
And a Shrieker.
Aaaand an AB.

One step at a time, OZ. We don't want to get me too overexcited, here :P

Unless its a graboid that opens up and has three Shriekers inside, and you can peel t he skin away to reveal ABs ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 04, 2011, 10:24:24 PM
Dunno how that could be achieved in revo-size haha. Would be fantastic though.


Back to topic though, I'd love a revo Raptor from the second film. Always had a soft spot for that savage, dynamic color scheme.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 04, 2011, 10:25:38 PM
Yeah, from what I remember, all the Raptor toys came in a bunch of odd colors :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 04, 2011, 10:28:24 PM
Quote gross indeed, I remember actively wondering why my JPIII Raptor wasn't like in the film. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ace3g on Jun 16, 2011, 04:22:52 AM
Steven Spielberg Is Brainstorming Ideas for JURASSIC PARK 4 With Mark Protosevich

Enter Spielberg himself who has apparently been meeting with screenwriter Mark Protosevich (the guy who was working with the director on that dead Oldboy remake with Will Smith) to develop ideas for Jurassic Park 4, a potential franchise reboot. Life found a way.

However, before anyone gets excited or pissed off about the prospect of a return to Isla Nublar or any of the other islands with dinosaurs now roaming wild 18 years after the fact, Heat Vision says Universal and Spileberg's representatives have stressed that no one has been brought to write a script or anything like that. As of now, talks about the sequel have been "exploratory" and nothing more. Of course, if Universal was going to find success in another franchise (they haven't had much success with anything lately) going back to their dino DNA for some box office bucks. And you can bet we'd see the Dilophosaurus spitting at our faces in 3D this time around as well.

http://www.firstshowing.net/2011/steven-spielberg-could-bring-jurassic-park-4-back-from-extinction/ (http://www.firstshowing.net/2011/steven-spielberg-could-bring-jurassic-park-4-back-from-extinction/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on Jun 16, 2011, 04:24:37 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Jun 16, 2011, 04:22:52 AM
Steven Spielberg Is Brainstorming Ideas for JURASSIC PARK 4 With Mark Protosevich

Enter Spielberg himself who has apparently been meeting with screenwriter Mark Protosevich (the guy who was working with the director on that dead Oldboy remake with Will Smith) to develop ideas for Jurassic Park 4, a potential franchise reboot. Life found a way.

However, before anyone gets excited or pissed off about the prospect of a return to Isla Nublar or any of the other islands with dinosaurs now roaming wild 18 years after the fact, Heat Vision says Universal and Spileberg's representatives have stressed that no one has been brought to write a script or anything like that. As of now, talks about the sequel have been "exploratory" and nothing more. Of course, if Universal was going to find success in another franchise (they haven't had much success with anything lately) going back to their dino DNA for some box office bucks. And you can bet we'd see the Dilophosaurus spitting at our faces in 3D this time around as well.

http://www.firstshowing.net/2011/steven-spielberg-could-bring-jurassic-park-4-back-from-extinction/ (http://www.firstshowing.net/2011/steven-spielberg-could-bring-jurassic-park-4-back-from-extinction/)

I'm listening intently.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 16, 2011, 04:53:48 AM
Me too. At least they're talking.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jun 16, 2011, 05:35:44 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Jun 16, 2011, 04:22:52 AM
Steven Spielberg Is Brainstorming Ideas for JURASSIC PARK 4 With Mark Protosevich

Enter Spielberg himself who has apparently been meeting with screenwriter Mark Protosevich (the guy who was working with the director on that dead Oldboy remake with Will Smith) to develop ideas for Jurassic Park 4, a potential franchise reboot. Life found a way.

However, before anyone gets excited or pissed off about the prospect of a return to Isla Nublar or any of the other islands with dinosaurs now roaming wild 18 years after the fact, Heat Vision says Universal and Spileberg's representatives have stressed that no one has been brought to write a script or anything like that. As of now, talks about the sequel have been "exploratory" and nothing more. Of course, if Universal was going to find success in another franchise (they haven't had much success with anything lately) going back to their dino DNA for some box office bucks. And you can bet we'd see the Dilophosaurus spitting at our faces in 3D this time around as well.

http://www.firstshowing.net/2011/steven-spielberg-could-bring-jurassic-park-4-back-from-extinction/ (http://www.firstshowing.net/2011/steven-spielberg-could-bring-jurassic-park-4-back-from-extinction/)
If they pretty much just forget Jurassic Park III and don't link it to it's events or designs, I'll be more than happy to have Stevie back.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jun 16, 2011, 10:11:02 AM
If Steven is interested, this has a good chance of finally getting somewhere. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on Jun 16, 2011, 11:49:26 AM
This makes me happy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Jun 16, 2011, 02:20:43 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Jun 16, 2011, 05:35:44 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Jun 16, 2011, 04:22:52 AM
Steven Spielberg Is Brainstorming Ideas for JURASSIC PARK 4 With Mark Protosevich

Enter Spielberg himself who has apparently been meeting with screenwriter Mark Protosevich (the guy who was working with the director on that dead Oldboy remake with Will Smith) to develop ideas for Jurassic Park 4, a potential franchise reboot. Life found a way.

However, before anyone gets excited or pissed off about the prospect of a return to Isla Nublar or any of the other islands with dinosaurs now roaming wild 18 years after the fact, Heat Vision says Universal and Spileberg's representatives have stressed that no one has been brought to write a script or anything like that. As of now, talks about the sequel have been "exploratory" and nothing more. Of course, if Universal was going to find success in another franchise (they haven't had much success with anything lately) going back to their dino DNA for some box office bucks. And you can bet we'd see the Dilophosaurus spitting at our faces in 3D this time around as well.

http://www.firstshowing.net/2011/steven-spielberg-could-bring-jurassic-park-4-back-from-extinction/ (http://www.firstshowing.net/2011/steven-spielberg-could-bring-jurassic-park-4-back-from-extinction/)
If they pretty much just forget Jurassic Park III and don't link it to it's events or designs, I'll be more than happy to have Stevie back.

why do they need to forget JP3, they could just as easily not mention it but keep it canon, i for one like the idea of dinos being more than just green/brown, so the designs don't bother me, so long as they limit it to only male dinos
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MudButt on Jun 16, 2011, 04:48:06 PM
Finally this movie might get somewhere! Come on Steve-O make this movie happen and make it GREAT!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 16, 2011, 05:21:38 PM
I'd like to see a "Rise of the Planet of the Apes" but with Dinosaurs.

You wouldn't even need 'the cure' McGuffin ... just Dinosaurs reclaiming their lands.

You could set it in current day. An alternate future where the dinosaurs have already made places uninhabitable by humans. We could have different factions of human's ... the dinosaur sympathizers, the rogue military units, the politicians trying to balance it all out, and the good and evil scientists sort of helping and hindering it all behind the scenes.

Meanwhile we have Raptor nests in the inner city ... a Triceratops on a golf course, and a Tyrannosaurs Rex stalking a cattle farm. Aeriel dogfights with a swarm of flying dinosaurs. The list goes ever on and on.

Logically it just has to be something 'different' ... not just dinosaurs on an island. The stakes need to be higher. It needs to be epic. It needs to kick you in the balls and eat your girlfriend.

Call it. Jurassic Park: Armageddon. Or Jurassic Park: Apocalypse. Both suitably Hollywood.

Maybe Jurassic Park: Evolution.

It's what I'd do.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jun 16, 2011, 05:25:50 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 16, 2011, 05:21:38 PM
I'd like to see a "Rise of the Planet of the Apes" but with Dinosaurs.

You wouldn't even need 'the cure' McGuffin ... just Dinosaurs reclaiming their lands.

You could set it in current day. An alternate future where the dinosaurs have already made places uninhabitable by humans. We could have different factions of human's ... the dinosaur sympathizers, the rogue military units, the politicians trying to balance it all out, and the good and evil scientists sort of helping and hindering it all behind the scenes.

Meanwhile we have Raptor nests in the inner city ... a Triceratops on a golf course, and a Tyrannosaurs Rex stalking a cattle farm. Aeriel dogfights with a swarm of flying dinosaurs. The list goes ever on and on.

Logically it just has to be something 'different' ... not just dinosaurs on an island. The stakes need to be higher. It needs to be epic. It needs to kick you in the balls and eat your girlfriend.

Call it. Jurassic Park: Armageddon. Or Jurassic Park: Apocalypse. Both suitably Hollywood.

Maybe Jurassic Park: Evolution.

It's what I'd do.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SX3JnUhTaE# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SX3JnUhTaE#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on Jun 16, 2011, 05:34:59 PM
I'm in favor of any plot that involves inexplicably resurrecting Ray Arnold (with badass robotic arm + facial scar, of course) as the protagonist.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 16, 2011, 06:05:37 PM
YESAYESAYESAYESAYESA YES!!!!!!


Quote from: Bad Replicant on Jun 16, 2011, 05:34:59 PM
I'm in favor of any plot that involves inexplicably resurrecting Ray Arnold (with badass robotic arm + facial scar, of course) as the protagonist.

AMEN TO THAT!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jun 16, 2011, 07:14:48 PM
I just want to see the original cast back again. Please don't reboot the series competely!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Tangakkai on Jun 16, 2011, 07:40:14 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Jun 16, 2011, 07:14:48 PM
I just want to see the original cast back again. Please don't reboot the series competely!

Much desired, yet very small in possibility. Sam, Jeff and Laura are not the youngest anymore. Besides now that hollywood has rebooted almost every movie of it's past (or are about to do so) it's rather likely we'll see a film with new actors yet reintroducing the franchise... probably not new entirely, but along the line of what "Predators" was for "Predator".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jun 16, 2011, 08:21:37 PM
I want a solid new cast with small roles for Jeff and Sam. Kind of like showing up for a couple of scenes at the beginning/end of the movie or something like that. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nope on Jun 16, 2011, 09:44:09 PM
I want Jeff.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Darkbladepred2.0 on Jun 16, 2011, 10:18:55 PM
My Jeff Goldblum senses lead me to this thread....

Quote from: Shobidoo on Jun 16, 2011, 09:44:09 PM
I want Jeff.

Oh.

I agree.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on Jun 16, 2011, 10:37:22 PM
As much as I love Jurassic Park I can't get enthused about another sequel. The series didn't really have anywhere else to go after the first film, purely because it covered so much ground so effectively. The best part of The Lost World was Postlethwaite's Ahab character, but you can't do that again; Bat Chain's idea appears to be the logical next step, but the T-Rex city rampage sequence x 1000 doesn't feel right if you compare it to the more intimate stakes of the first movie.

I want to see more dinosaur movies and I want to see more dinosaur movies with Jeff Goldblum. But JP should rest.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Jun 16, 2011, 10:38:37 PM
I would love to see another jurassic park movie with some cameo's from the old school cast. but to be honest i think i want something fresh. new people. how many times can they trick the old cast to go back to the island seriously :P or i would love to see a version called "Jurassic park IV: Nature finds a way" and see some water dinosaurs or something like that. something new.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 17, 2011, 01:46:42 AM
Quote from: AvatarIII on Jun 16, 2011, 02:20:43 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Jun 16, 2011, 05:35:44 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Jun 16, 2011, 04:22:52 AM
Steven Spielberg Is Brainstorming Ideas for JURASSIC PARK 4 With Mark Protosevich

Enter Spielberg himself who has apparently been meeting with screenwriter Mark Protosevich (the guy who was working with the director on that dead Oldboy remake with Will Smith) to develop ideas for Jurassic Park 4, a potential franchise reboot. Life found a way.

However, before anyone gets excited or pissed off about the prospect of a return to Isla Nublar or any of the other islands with dinosaurs now roaming wild 18 years after the fact, Heat Vision says Universal and Spileberg's representatives have stressed that no one has been brought to write a script or anything like that. As of now, talks about the sequel have been "exploratory" and nothing more. Of course, if Universal was going to find success in another franchise (they haven't had much success with anything lately) going back to their dino DNA for some box office bucks. And you can bet we'd see the Dilophosaurus spitting at our faces in 3D this time around as well.

http://www.firstshowing.net/2011/steven-spielberg-could-bring-jurassic-park-4-back-from-extinction/ (http://www.firstshowing.net/2011/steven-spielberg-could-bring-jurassic-park-4-back-from-extinction/)
If they pretty much just forget Jurassic Park III and don't link it to it's events or designs, I'll be more than happy to have Stevie back.

why do they need to forget JP3, they could just as easily not mention it but keep it canon, i for one like the idea of dinos being more than just green/brown, so the designs don't bother me, so long as they limit it to only male dinos

Who cares about the dinos' sex? They swap at will anyway, remember?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jun 23, 2011, 05:39:33 PM
JP blu-ray set coming out on October 24th.

http://www.blurayfreak.com/2011/06/jurassic-park-coming-to-blu-ray-october-24th.html (http://www.blurayfreak.com/2011/06/jurassic-park-coming-to-blu-ray-october-24th.html)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 23, 2011, 06:05:40 PM
Oooooh f**k yes!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TheMonolith on Jun 23, 2011, 06:10:10 PM
I still want to see something based on Trespasser.
It would be like Deliverance, but instead of rapist rednecks it is dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Jun 23, 2011, 06:21:17 PM
I really think Universal should do a fourth. Even though JP3 wasn't on-par with the Spielberg movies, it still had that charm that only JP movies can deliver. The whole human survival aspect mixed in with incredible animatronics, stunning CGI and wonderful soundtracks; it's definitley something I want to experience again. I know the logical step for a fourth seems to have the dinos spread onto the mainland, and it's an idea that I think could work if done right. Then again it's getting further from the series' roots and it could easily fail big time.

Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Jun 23, 2011, 05:39:33 PM
JP blu-ray set coming out on October 24th.

http://www.blurayfreak.com/2011/06/jurassic-park-coming-to-blu-ray-october-24th.html (http://www.blurayfreak.com/2011/06/jurassic-park-coming-to-blu-ray-october-24th.html)


(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tribute.ca%2Ftribute_objects%2Fimages%2Fstars%2Frichard_attenborough.jpg&hash=fd6998921f40ecc503daef8fc2e382352b15d9f7)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 23, 2011, 06:23:26 PM
Oh God, that collector's edition with the Tyrannosaurus mini-diorama looks so juicy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 23, 2011, 06:35:51 PM
I wonder if the early 90's CGI will stand up under 1080p scrutiny.

No reports of them Lucasing up anything ... but Spielberg isn't beyond that with his release of ET on DVD.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ace3g on Jun 23, 2011, 06:54:35 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 23, 2011, 06:35:51 PM
I wonder if the early 90's CGI will stand up under 1080p scrutiny.

No reports of them Lucasing up anything ... but Spielberg isn't beyond that with his release of ET on DVD.

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/49897 (http://www.aintitcool.com/node/49897)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 23, 2011, 07:28:56 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jun 23, 2011, 06:23:26 PM
Oh God, that collector's edition with the Tyrannosaurus mini-diorama looks so juicy.

Damn right. HAVE TO GET THAT!!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on Jun 23, 2011, 08:04:15 PM
*walks into thread*

Hey guys whats going on?
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Jun 23, 2011, 05:39:33 PM
JP blu-ray set coming out on October 24th.

http://www.blurayfreak.com/2011/06/jurassic-park-coming-to-blu-ray-october-24th.html (http://www.blurayfreak.com/2011/06/jurassic-park-coming-to-blu-ray-october-24th.html)

QuoteJP blu-ray set coming out on October 24th.
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgifs.gifmania.co.il%2FAnimated-Gifs-Manga-Anime%2FAnimations-Gurren-Lagann%2Ftengen-toppa-gurren-lagann2.gif&hash=e5cc1490b37fb77454a97c8974c1fb406f45a779)
HOOOOLLLY SHHHIIIIIT!!!!
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Jun 23, 2011, 08:07:51 PM
Eh. I only want the first film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Jun 23, 2011, 08:17:23 PM
Is there a pic of the collector's edition for the JP Blu-Ray trilogy?  I can't find it anywhere.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Jun 23, 2011, 08:19:52 PM
Quote from: predxeno on Jun 23, 2011, 08:17:23 PM
Is there a pic of the collector's edition for the JP Blu-Ray trilogy?  I can't find it anywhere.

Here ya go ;)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fblu-ray.typepad.com%2F.a%2F6a00d8341c505253ef01538eec26f9970b-pi&hash=35ced42ec47d70db7a621424e48134c9d2607ba4)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on Jun 23, 2011, 08:20:48 PM
Quote from: TJ Doc on Jun 23, 2011, 08:07:51 PM
Eh. I only want the first film.

Yup.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Jun 23, 2011, 08:27:15 PM
But they'll make us play the waiting game, unfortunately.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on Jun 23, 2011, 08:34:17 PM
Only been a little off 65 million years.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jun 23, 2011, 08:34:46 PM
I'm pretty sure that the collector edition will be the same size as the MK9's Kollector's Edition.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 23, 2011, 08:34:58 PM
Quote from: Sharp Sticks on Jun 23, 2011, 08:34:17 PM
Only been a little off 65 million years.
But the Adventure began that time--

PARADOCKS
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nope on Jun 23, 2011, 08:37:04 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on Jun 23, 2011, 08:19:52 PM
Quote from: predxeno on Jun 23, 2011, 08:17:23 PM
Is there a pic of the collector's edition for the JP Blu-Ray trilogy?  I can't find it anywhere.

Here ya go ;)

http://blu-ray.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341c505253ef01538eec26f9970b-pi
Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww yeah.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Jun 23, 2011, 08:39:04 PM
I read the article that came with the pic.  Is it true that this is confirmed only in Spain so far?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 23, 2011, 09:05:24 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Jun 23, 2011, 06:54:35 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 23, 2011, 06:35:51 PM
I wonder if the early 90's CGI will stand up under 1080p scrutiny.

No reports of them Lucasing up anything ... but Spielberg isn't beyond that with his release of ET on DVD.

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/49897 (http://www.aintitcool.com/node/49897)

Oh ... Thanks for that! Now he can go back and give those cops their real guns instead of cgi walkie-talkies.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on Jun 23, 2011, 10:27:13 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Jun 23, 2011, 06:54:35 PM

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/49897 (http://www.aintitcool.com/node/49897)

Now I have two Blu-Ray releases to look forward to. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 24, 2011, 03:51:55 AM
The other being Star Wars presumably?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on Jun 24, 2011, 01:22:05 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 24, 2011, 03:51:55 AM
The other being Star Wars presumably?

That makes it 3 now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jun 24, 2011, 01:25:09 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Jun 24, 2011, 01:22:05 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 24, 2011, 03:51:55 AM
The other being Star Wars presumably?

That makes it 3 now.

:D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Jun 24, 2011, 02:10:12 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Jun 24, 2011, 01:22:05 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 24, 2011, 03:51:55 AM
The other being Star Wars presumably?

That makes it 3 now.

I guess the second one would be The Lord of the Rings then?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Jun 24, 2011, 03:34:20 PM
How much do you think the JP Collector's Set is going to be?  I hope isn't as much as the Alien Anthology.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on Jun 24, 2011, 03:47:41 PM
Quote from: Laufey on Jun 24, 2011, 02:10:12 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Jun 24, 2011, 01:22:05 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 24, 2011, 03:51:55 AM
The other being Star Wars presumably?

That makes it 3 now.

I guess the second one would be The Lord of the Rings then?

4, thank you all I should eventually be poor now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 25, 2011, 12:10:27 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Jun 24, 2011, 03:34:20 PM
How much do you think the JP Collector's Set is going to be?  I hope isn't as much as the Alien Anthology.

Hm, CAD at least $179.99 most likely. Dios ain't cheap.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 25, 2011, 03:35:54 PM
The Watchmen ultimate collector's edition BR with the Nite Owl diorama costs around $119. The Terminator 2 complete collector's set BR around $110. So yeah, I'd go around those prices, with a top of $130-$140 most likely.
But hey, we can wait for... sales. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Jun 25, 2011, 04:21:50 PM
... That's so crazy it might just work!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Jun 27, 2011, 04:44:36 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.comicbookmovie.com%2Fimages%2Fusers%2Fgallerypictures%2F31084L.JPG&hash=34fa376c613b2c14a43d041dcd37b2947e0555f2)

http://comicbookmovie.com/fansites/scifimediazone/news/?a=40439 (http://comicbookmovie.com/fansites/scifimediazone/news/?a=40439)

QuoteALL-NEW BONUS FEATURES ON BLU-RAY & DVD

"Return to Jurassic Park" – this six-part documentary features all-new interviews with the many of the cast members from all three films, the filmmakers and Steven Spielberg.

* Dawn of a New Era
* Making Pre-history
* The Next Step in Evolution
* Finding The Lost World
* Something Survived
* The Third Adventure

ADDITIONAL FEATURES EXCLUSIVE TO BLU-RAY™

* BD-LIVE™ - Access the BD-Live™ Center through your Internet-connected player to watch exclusive content, the latest trailers, and more!
* MY SCENES: Bookmark your favorite scenes from the film.
* pocket BLU™: The groundbreaking pocket BLU™ app uses iPad®, iPhone®, iPod® touch, Android™, PC and Mac® to work seamlessly with a network-connected Blu-ray™ player. Plus iPad® owners can enjoy a new, enhanced edition of pocket BLU™ made especially to take advantage of the tablet's larger screen and high resolution display. Consumers will be able to browse through a library of Blu-ray™ content and watch entertaining extras on-the-go in a way that's bigger and better than ever before. pocket BLU™ offers advanced features such as:
* ADVANCED REMOTE CONTROL: A sleek, elegant new way to operate your Blu-ray™ player. Users can navigate through menus, playback and BD-Live™ functions with ease.
* VIDEO TIMELINE: Users can easily bring up the video timeline, allowing them to instantly access any point in the film.
* MOBILE-TO-GO: Users can unlock a selection of bonus content with their Blu-ray™ discs to save to their device or to stream from anywhere there is a Wi-Fi network, enabling them to enjoy content on the go, anytime, anywhere.
* BROWSE TITLES: Users will have access to a complete list of pocket BLU™-enabled titles available and coming to Blu-ray™. They can view free previews and see what additional content is available to unlock on their device.
* KEYBOARD: Entering data is fast and easy with your device's intuitive keyboard.

The following bonus features also appear on both the Blu-ray™ and DVD:
* The Making of Jurassic Park
* The Making of The Lost World: Jurassic Park
* The Making of Jurassic Park III
* Steven Spielberg Directs Jurassic Park
* Early Pre-Production Meetings
* The World of Jurassic Park
* The Magic of Industrial Light & Magic
* Location Scouting
* Phil Tippett Animatics: Raptors In The Kitchen
* The Jurassic Park Phenomenon: A Discussion with Author Michael Crichton
* Industrial Light & Magic and Jurassic Park: Before and After The Visual Effects
* Industrial Light & Magic and The Lost World: Jurassic Park Before & After
* The Industrial Light & Magic Press Reel
* A Visit to Industrial Light & Magic
* Hurricane in Kauai Featurette
* Dinosaur Turntables
* The Dinosaurs of Jurassic Park III
* Montana: Finding New Dinosaurs
* Animatics: T-Rex Attack
* The Special Effects of Jurassic Park III
* The Sounds of Jurassic Park III
* The Art of Jurassic Park III
* Tour of Stan Winston Studio
* Feature Commentary with Special Effects Team
* Production Archives: Storyboards, Models, Photographs, Design Sketches and Conceptual Drawings
* Deleted Scenes
* Theatrical Trailers
* And MORE!

SYNOPSIS

From Academy Award-winning filmmaker Steven Spielberg, the Jurassic Park Ultimate Trilogy is one of the most successful film franchises in worldwide box-office history. On a remote tropical island, an amazing living theme park becomes a game of survival for humans foolhardy enough to set foot on it. Meticulously recreated dinosaurs spring to astonishing life as the film's breathtaking special effects and thrilling action sequences keep audiences on the edge of their seats. Each chapter of the history-making saga delivers even more action and spectacular visual effects than its predecessor, as nature's ultimate killing machines once again rule the earth. Almost 20 years after its inception, the Jurassic Park Trilogy remains an unmatched cinematic experience.

Jurassic Park

A multimillionaire (Richard Attenborough) unveils a new theme park where visitors can observe dinosaurs cloned using advanced DNA technology. But when an employee tampers with the security system, the dinosaurs escape, forcing the visitors to fight for their survival. Sam Neill, Jeff Goldblum and Laura Dern star in this thrilling, action-packed blockbuster from acclaimed director Steven Spielberg and based on the novel by Michael Crichton.

The Lost World: Jurassic Park

Four years after Jurassic Park's genetically bred dinosaurs ran amok, multimillionaire John Hammond (Richard Attenborough) shocks chaos theorist Ian Malcolm (Jeff Goldblum) by revealing that Hammond has been breeding more beasties at a secret location. Malcolm, his paleontologist ladylove (Julianne Moore) and a wildlife videographer (Vince Vaughn) join an expedition to document the lethal lizards' natural behavior in this action-packed thriller.

Jurassic Park III

In need of funds for research, Dr. Alan Grant (Sam Neill) accepts a large sum of money to accompany Paul and Amanda Kirby (William H. Macy and Tea Leoni) on an aerial tour of the infamous Isla Sorna. It isn't long before all hell breaks loose and the stranded wayfarers must fight for survival as a host of new -- and even more deadly -- dinosaurs try to make snacks of them. Laura Dern, Michael Jeter, Alessandro Nivola and Trevor Morgan co-star.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on Jun 27, 2011, 05:36:11 PM
*see's all the special features, f**k it see's everything*

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gifsoup.com%2Fview2%2F1287735%2Fmonster-hunter-tri-cheer-o.gif&hash=9bb749f21aa1ebb19f60c4b965d9b7f4cc25e1e7)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on Jun 27, 2011, 06:37:25 PM
Looks pretty bitchin'. I got my fingers crossed for more than just the two deleted scenes from TLW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Jun 27, 2011, 08:13:55 PM
Here's a trailer:

http://comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=40459 (http://comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=40459)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 27, 2011, 08:28:17 PM
Ooh my. Had goosebumps throughout the whole damn trailer.
Literally can't wait for this Pack to come. Looking forward to see the new special features! I also hope they partially restored the already existing ones.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 27, 2011, 08:32:10 PM
Looking great. I would love to own this. Even though the first one is the only one I really care about now, the sequels also played huge roles in my childhood.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 27, 2011, 08:41:42 PM
I'm excited about the digital copies. JP on the go? f**k YEAH!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Jun 27, 2011, 08:53:30 PM
You can download the trailer in HD over here:

http://www.hd-trailers.net/movie/jurassic-park/ (http://www.hd-trailers.net/movie/jurassic-park/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Jun 27, 2011, 08:54:00 PM
I'm buying this.
*begins saving money*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Jun 27, 2011, 09:46:19 PM
Bonus features look great. Can't wait to watch the Return to Jurassic Park documentary.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jun 28, 2011, 07:27:21 AM
That trailer made me feel like a child again. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jun 28, 2011, 07:35:22 AM
Oh fuq that's a sexy transfer.

And nice avatar, Bad Replicant.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 28, 2011, 02:35:24 PM
New picture:
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.badtaste.it%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fimages%2Fvarie%2F2011%2Fjurassic%2520park%2520blu-ray%252001.jpg&hash=8a70f46ce274c9eabb78196af35cd22b06c580a2)
Looks absolutely fantastic. Head of the Rex looks a bit off, but I'm sure that's a prototype.

Ps. Given we are talking Jurassic Park in general here, shouldn't we take out the 'IV' from the title?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on Jun 28, 2011, 02:46:20 PM
Oh man, I want that so much! :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Jun 28, 2011, 04:24:34 PM
I'm definitley buying that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 28, 2011, 09:11:03 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jun 28, 2011, 02:35:24 PM
New picture:
http://www.badtaste.it/sites/default/files/images/varie/2011/jurassic%20park%20blu-ray%2001.jpg
Looks absolutely fantastic. Head of the Rex looks a bit off, but I'm sure that's a prototype.

Ps. Given we are talking Jurassic Park in general here, shouldn't we take out the 'IV' from the title?

Any word on pricing?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Jun 28, 2011, 09:12:09 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 28, 2011, 09:11:03 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jun 28, 2011, 02:35:24 PM
New picture:
http://www.badtaste.it/sites/default/files/images/varie/2011/jurassic%20park%20blu-ray%2001.jpg
Looks absolutely fantastic. Head of the Rex looks a bit off, but I'm sure that's a prototype.

Ps. Given we are talking Jurassic Park in general here, shouldn't we take out the 'IV' from the title?

Any word on pricing?

Don't care about the price, i will buy it anyway :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 28, 2011, 09:16:10 PM
Unfortunately no, nothing on the price, yet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Jun 28, 2011, 09:19:53 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhI0OVs_zj0#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhI0OVs_zj0#ws)
I NEED TO KNOW THE PRICE
I just hope it aint much over $100
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 29, 2011, 01:32:02 AM
I'm going to hope nothing more than $50.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jun 29, 2011, 01:42:14 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jun 28, 2011, 02:35:24 PM
New picture:
http://www.badtaste.it/sites/default/files/images/varie/2011/jurassic%20park%20blu-ray%2001.jpg
Looks absolutely fantastic. Head of the Rex looks a bit off, but I'm sure that's a prototype.

Ps. Given we are talking Jurassic Park in general here, shouldn't we take out the 'IV' from the title?
That rex looks a lot... lamer than in the previous pic.

Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 29, 2011, 01:32:02 AM
I'm going to hope nothing more than $50.
Judging from all that packaging, and the fact that it's three blu-rays, I'm sure it'll be at least $75.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 29, 2011, 01:51:54 AM
Yeah, probably $75 with the statue. But I would rather pay $40-$50 for just the movies.  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on Jun 29, 2011, 02:05:25 AM
A Richard Attenborough statue would've a been better bonus (true of any Blu-ray release, really).

Quote from: Space Sweeper on Jun 28, 2011, 07:35:22 AM
Oh fuq that's a sexy transfer.

And nice avatar, Bad Replicant.  :laugh:

Strange part is, it just appeared there one day. This is the power of James Woods Hades.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on Jun 29, 2011, 02:06:56 AM
Quote from: Bad Replicant on Jun 29, 2011, 02:05:25 AM
A Richard Attenborough statue would've a been better bonus (true of any Blu-ray release, really).

Only if it's encased in amber.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jun 29, 2011, 02:08:16 AM
Quote from: Sharp Sticks on Jun 29, 2011, 02:06:56 AM
Quote from: Bad Replicant on Jun 29, 2011, 02:05:25 AM
A Richard Attenborough statue would've a been better bonus (true of any Blu-ray release, really).

Only if it's encased in amber.
And with a holographic Mister DNA in there as you rotate it.





Spoiler
DANOSAWRS
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on Jun 29, 2011, 02:12:28 AM
Lenticular Mister DNA; Universal better be listening, because I'm not shelling out $75 for anything less.

Spoiler
FULL OF

Spoiler
HOLES
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 29, 2011, 02:29:00 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jun 28, 2011, 02:35:24 PM
New picture:
http://www.badtaste.it/sites/default/files/images/varie/2011/jurassic%20park%20blu-ray%2001.jpg
Looks absolutely fantastic. Head of the Rex looks a bit off, but I'm sure that's a prototype.

Ps. Given we are talking Jurassic Park in general here, shouldn't we take out the 'IV' from the title?

SUPER!!!!!!

COOL!!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Jun 29, 2011, 12:10:40 PM
This brings up memories. I guess october 25th will be a day off work for me :P so i can watch all 3 in a row  8)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOrOTlOgflM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOrOTlOgflM#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on Jun 29, 2011, 01:43:45 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on Jun 29, 2011, 12:10:40 PM
october 25th

Damn I'm going to be watching all three Jurassic Park films and playing Battlefield 3...yeah that'll be great day. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 29, 2011, 11:37:42 PM
Quote from: Sharp Sticks on Jun 29, 2011, 02:06:56 AM
Quote from: Bad Replicant on Jun 29, 2011, 02:05:25 AM
A Richard Attenborough statue would've a been better bonus (true of any Blu-ray release, really).

Only if it's encased in amber.

Yes! But the mosquito cane head would have been inspired.

I don't like the Rex Statue. Looks like a plastic Applause statue from Spencers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 30, 2011, 02:49:06 AM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Jun 29, 2011, 01:43:45 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on Jun 29, 2011, 12:10:40 PM
october 25th

Damn I'm going to be watching all three Jurassic Park films and playing Battlefield 3...yeah that'll be great day. ;D

Count me in ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Jun 30, 2011, 09:33:57 PM
Don't know if it is already posted but here is something :P

http://screenrant.com/jurassic-park-4-story-works-rob-119788/?utm_source=scribol&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=scribol (http://screenrant.com/jurassic-park-4-story-works-rob-119788/?utm_source=scribol&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=scribol)

QuoteSteven Spielberg and writer Mark Protosevich are putting their brains together to think up a story for 'Jurassic Park 4′ to relaunch the franchise. Are you ready for the return of dinosaurs on the big screen?

Jurassic Park 4 Update

A few weeks ago we wrote about Jurassic Park 4, a project that's seemingly been off and on for many years. At the time, director Joe Johnston, currently focused on the upcoming release of Captain America: The First Avenger, was rather confident the project would be moving forward. Franchise star Sam Neill however, wasn't as optimistic.

As it turns out, Johnston must be in the know since the project is back in the early stages of development as key figureheads meet to discuss the film's story...

Heat Vision has the exclusive report that should have Jurassic Park fans excited: Steven Spielberg has been meeting with writer Mark Protosevich to go over ideas for the fourth installment in the dinosaur franchise based on the novel by Michael Crichton. Spielberg of course, directed Jurassic Park 1 & 2 and served as an executive producer on the third.

Joe Johnston instead helmed the third film and has long been in line to helm the fourth as well. Protosevich was involved with the story of this summer's Marvel Studios hit, Thor (see the Marvel connection here?) and served as a screenplay writer for I Am Legend.

The plan is to use Jurassic Park 4 as a means to relaunch the franchise so Universal can have another series of tentpoles to guarantee box office revenue for years to come (think Fast & Furious). It's nearly been ten years since Jurassic Park III hit theaters and in today's day and age, that's a long time in between sequels and reboots. Spielberg is certainly in the dino mood however, with his television series Terra Nova also debuting this fall.

The most notable difference in the industry from then till now is the incredible advancement in animation technology and this can only benefit the franchise which relies heavily on CGI to bring many of the creatures and visuals to life. Whether or not such a film would see franchise regulars Sam Neill, Jeff Goldblum or Laura Dern return in some capacity is still up in the air, but don't be surprised if they are worked into the plot somehow as a marketing tool.

When are we getting a Dino-Riders movie? The only thing cooler than dinosaurs are dinosaurs with lasers. Click the following image and thank me later.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Jun 30, 2011, 09:48:02 PM
Quote
The plan is to use Jurassic Park 4 as a means to relaunch the franchise so Universal can have another series of tentpoles to guarantee box office revenue for years to come (think Fast & Furious).

Ummm...yeah? :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Jun 30, 2011, 10:07:27 PM
As long as its a great mix of CGI and animatronic dinosaurs, I'll be interested.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 01, 2011, 12:26:13 AM
Dino-Riders movie? No thanks. I'm fine with the cartoon but I think seeing CG dinosaurs with lasers in live action would look super-cheesy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Jul 01, 2011, 12:50:51 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 01, 2011, 12:26:13 AM
Dino-Riders movie? No thanks. I'm fine with the cartoon but I think seeing CG dinosaurs with lasers in live action would look super-cheesy.

What are you talkin 'bout?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 01, 2011, 04:18:06 AM
QuoteWhen are we getting a Dino-Riders movie? The only thing cooler than dinosaurs are dinosaurs with lasers. Click the following image and thank me later.

The idea of it displeases me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Jul 01, 2011, 05:40:57 AM
Oh, ha, I didn't see that and thought that was in response to me. Yeah, no battle-dinos for me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: brennan4 on Jul 01, 2011, 05:45:11 AM

Quote from: Snowdog on Jun 30, 2011, 09:33:57 PM
Don't know if it is already posted but here is something :P

http://screenrant.com/jurassic-park-4-story-works-rob-119788/?utm_source=scribol&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=scribol (http://screenrant.com/jurassic-park-4-story-works-rob-119788/?utm_source=scribol&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=scribol)

QuoteSteven Spielberg and writer Mark Protosevich are putting their brains together to think up a story for 'Jurassic Park 4′ to relaunch the franchise. Are you ready for the return of dinosaurs on the big screen?

Jurassic Park 4 Update

A few weeks ago we wrote about Jurassic Park 4, a project that's seemingly been off and on for many years. At the time, director Joe Johnston, currently focused on the upcoming release of Captain America: The First Avenger, was rather confident the project would be moving forward. Franchise star Sam Neill however, wasn't as optimistic.

As it turns out, Johnston must be in the know since the project is back in the early stages of development as key figureheads meet to discuss the film's story...

Heat Vision has the exclusive report that should have Jurassic Park fans excited: Steven Spielberg has been meeting with writer Mark Protosevich to go over ideas for the fourth installment in the dinosaur franchise based on the novel by Michael Crichton. Spielberg of course, directed Jurassic Park 1 & 2 and served as an executive producer on the third.

Joe Johnston instead helmed the third film and has long been in line to helm the fourth as well. Protosevich was involved with the story of this summer's Marvel Studios hit, Thor (see the Marvel connection here?) and served as a screenplay writer for I Am Legend.

The plan is to use Jurassic Park 4 as a means to relaunch the franchise so Universal can have another series of tentpoles to guarantee box office revenue for years to come (think Fast & Furious). It's nearly been ten years since Jurassic Park III hit theaters and in today's day and age, that's a long time in between sequels and reboots. Spielberg is certainly in the dino mood however, with his television series Terra Nova also debuting this fall.

The most notable difference in the industry from then till now is the incredible advancement in animation technology and this can only benefit the franchise which relies heavily on CGI to bring many of the creatures and visuals to life. Whether or not such a film would see franchise regulars Sam Neill, Jeff Goldblum or Laura Dern return in some capacity is still up in the air, but don't be surprised if they are worked into the plot somehow as a marketing tool.

When are we getting a Dino-Riders movie? The only thing cooler than dinosaurs are dinosaurs with lasers. Click the following image and thank me later.
Would they just decide to make the movie or not, and stop teasing us already? Anyway, I'm excited about the game and blu ray. After ten years of nothing happening, why is everything happening now(also, the comics are exciting too, for those of you who have read them.)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: XenoVC on Jul 01, 2011, 07:54:59 PM
Quote from: brennan4 on Jul 01, 2011, 05:45:11 AM
After ten years of nothing happening, why is everything happening now(also, the comics are exciting too, for those of you who have read them

Redemption was absolute crap IMO, bold and idiotic.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Tangakkai on Jul 03, 2011, 02:32:47 AM
^
^

What the frack is "Terra Nova"?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 03, 2011, 04:39:25 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terra_Nova_(TV_series) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terra_Nova_(TV_series))
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Tangakkai on Jul 05, 2011, 01:06:16 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 03, 2011, 04:39:25 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terra_Nova_(TV_series) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terra_Nova_(TV_series))

Sounds very interesting... but also very cheesy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 06, 2011, 08:30:22 PM
Closest thing we'll get to a JP IV at this point, way I see it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jul 08, 2011, 06:32:32 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages3.blu-ray.com%2Fmovies%2Fcovers%2F26076_front.jpg&hash=a6f412710f915bc52025a91ed11386b0eabca00c)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F_C5DIzqKfv5s%2FS4Yy5m_4i_I%2FAAAAAAAAAAM%2FTYkCYXfIFOc%2FS220%2Fmad-men-don-draper-closeup.jpg&hash=5ef14e61646608f782908992c8bb1ea01fa88de2)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 08, 2011, 01:25:55 PM
:o
I hope the head looks that way because of the angle. We'll see. I'm so picking up this anyway!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Jul 17, 2011, 09:01:35 PM
Joe Johnston talks Jurassic Park 4.

http://screenrant.com/joe-johnston-jurassic-park-4-captain-america-director-rothc-123898/ (http://screenrant.com/joe-johnston-jurassic-park-4-captain-america-director-rothc-123898/)

Quote"We are in discussions about 'Jurassic Park 4.' The most important thing I can tell you is that it starts a new trilogy that will go off in a different direction — a completely different direction that is very exciting, and different from anything we've seen." Johnston continued by saying that, "It starts with the history of the first trilogy, but it spins it off in a completely different direction. That's all I can tell you."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 17, 2011, 09:05:26 PM
Quote from: Laufey on Jul 17, 2011, 09:01:35 PM
Joe Johnston talks Jurassic Park 4.

http://screenrant.com/joe-johnston-jurassic-park-4-captain-america-director-rothc-123898/ (http://screenrant.com/joe-johnston-jurassic-park-4-captain-america-director-rothc-123898/)

Quote"We are in discussions about 'Jurassic Park 4.' The most important thing I can tell you is that it starts a new trilogy that will go off in a different direction — a completely different direction that is very exciting, and different from anything we've seen." Johnston continued by saying that, "It starts with the history of the first trilogy, but it spins it off in a completely different direction. That's all I can tell you."

At least we now know that it is definitely being worked on.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 17, 2011, 09:08:13 PM
History of InGen, I assume? Intriguing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 17, 2011, 09:42:37 PM
Quote from: Laufey on Jul 17, 2011, 09:01:35 PM
Joe Johnston talks Jurassic Park 4.

http://screenrant.com/joe-johnston-jurassic-park-4-captain-america-director-rothc-123898/ (http://screenrant.com/joe-johnston-jurassic-park-4-captain-america-director-rothc-123898/)

Quote"We are in discussions about 'Jurassic Park 4.' The most important thing I can tell you is that it starts a new trilogy that will go off in a different direction — a completely different direction that is very exciting, and different from anything we've seen." Johnston continued by saying that, "It starts with the history of the first trilogy, but it spins it off in a completely different direction. That's all I can tell you."

Like the idea. Do not like the director at the helm.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jul 17, 2011, 10:05:32 PM
He said sorry for JP3, let's see how Captain America turns out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Jul 17, 2011, 10:08:56 PM
i don't think Jurassic Park 3 had bad Directing, it's the writting that was shit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 17, 2011, 10:52:24 PM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Jul 17, 2011, 10:08:56 PM
i don't think Jurassic Park 3 had bad Directing, it's the writting that was shit.

Agreed on this. I tihnk that Johnson did the best that he could with what he had.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 17, 2011, 11:11:20 PM
That's a cheap cop-out. He could have at least changed the way the film ended.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jul 18, 2011, 08:26:44 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 17, 2011, 10:52:24 PM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Jul 17, 2011, 10:08:56 PM
i don't think Jurassic Park 3 had bad Directing, it's the writting that was shit.

Agreed on this. I tihnk that Johnson did the best that he could with what he had.

I agree as well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 18, 2011, 08:51:46 AM
One sheer example of good directing in Part 3 is the introduction to the Pteranodon. Score, mist, steps... steps... silhouette BAM! Here it f**king is. What a sequence.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: XenoVC on Jul 18, 2011, 09:43:23 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 17, 2011, 09:42:37 PM
Quote from: Laufey on Jul 17, 2011, 09:01:35 PM
Joe Johnston talks Jurassic Park 4.

http://screenrant.com/joe-johnston-jurassic-park-4-captain-america-director-rothc-123898/ (http://screenrant.com/joe-johnston-jurassic-park-4-captain-america-director-rothc-123898/)

Quote"We are in discussions about 'Jurassic Park 4.' The most important thing I can tell you is that it starts a new trilogy that will go off in a different direction — a completely different direction that is very exciting, and different from anything we've seen." Johnston continued by saying that, "It starts with the history of the first trilogy, but it spins it off in a completely different direction. That's all I can tell you."

Like the idea. Do not like the director at the helm.

Johnston seemed way more, 'iono, knowing, than he would let on, I'm just picking this up from the JP3 commentary, and interviews and whatnot.

He gives off sprinkles of thought that led me to believe he could have made something special if the play it safe generic 'rescue movie' thing hadn't been decided on, rather than a film that would have added to the actual mythology of JP and TLW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: jacc.90 on Jul 18, 2011, 01:54:21 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jul 18, 2011, 08:51:46 AM
One sheer example of good directing in Part 3 is the introduction to the Pteranodon. Score, mist, steps... steps... silhouette BAM! Here it f**king is. What a sequence.
in my opinion
Yes, but that movie dont have a horror touch like the others, in the 1º and the 2º all people was frightened for not to be dino-food, in this movie "the family" makes that the movie can not be taken seriously. the problem is always find to ERIC -.-
examples :
JP1: PG 13
JP2: PG 13
JP3: PG 07
original books have the special feature of have very violent deaths.
if you change it that it's like walk in the park simply
we need a new solid history, but i'm not thinking in remake(no god)
jurasic park needs be and aventure/horror movie, and be a serious movie, ( without families ^^U) (PG 13)
1 thing more : it's necesary have always a child in middle of the argument?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 18, 2011, 02:10:46 PM
But all three movies had children, and families, to some extent...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: jacc.90 on Jul 18, 2011, 02:17:10 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 18, 2011, 02:10:46 PM
But all three movies had children, and families, to some extent...
yes i know but in the third movie was exagerated, they were more concerned with the boy than anything else.
the movie lacks fear
and becomes a movie for the whole family.
I personally think that there loses some of its essence
:-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 18, 2011, 02:19:53 PM
Jurassic Park has always been pretty family oriented, though. I agree that it was exaggerated in 3, but I don't want them to completely lost that element in the sequels. Kids should be able to enjoy Jurassic Park, too.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Jul 18, 2011, 02:24:28 PM
i think what ruined the third movie was the fact there were parents not the fact there was a kid,
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: jacc.90 on Jul 18, 2011, 02:28:04 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on Jul 18, 2011, 02:24:28 PM
i think what ruined the third movie was the fact there were parents not the fact there was a kid,
parents and children are on the same box XD
I blame them both  :-\

Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 18, 2011, 02:19:53 PM
Jurassic Park has always been pretty family oriented, though. I agree that it was exaggerated in 3, but I don't want them to completely lost that element in the sequels. Kids should be able to enjoy Jurassic Park, too.
yes, im agree,
but in a movie PG 13 ... ^^U
there is little for the family (dinosaur looks like monsters and deaths have violence)
and that I saw Jurassic Park 1 in the cinema with 3 years old XD
i love jurasic parks movies, the 3º too ^^, buy I think it is necessary to return to the original concept that has become so diluted, and focus in a serious and realistic form, with children,mmm  oki, But non exaggerate XD
I just want that they resurrect the franchise with style  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Jul 18, 2011, 02:39:21 PM
if anything i think the parents in 3 were too wimpy and the kid was too bad-ass in JP 1 and 2 we saw the kids be terrified and then harden underpressure, in 3, the kid was already totally hardened, and so the fact he was so "cool" was kind of annoying,
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: jacc.90 on Jul 18, 2011, 03:08:40 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on Jul 18, 2011, 02:39:21 PM
if anything i think the parents in 3 were too wimpy and the kid was too bad-ass in JP 1 and 2 we saw the kids be terrified and then harden underpressure, in 3, the kid was already totally hardened, and so the fact he was so "cool" was kind of annoying,
Im agree too . ^^



Spinosaurus, how you may be scared of these 3? ... oh god
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.imagengratis.org%2Fimages%2Fmv5bmja0nti3m.jpg&hash=b33862d24a40aea9f7ae20289a503726be7dbe79)

;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jul 18, 2011, 08:01:30 PM
Spino should have eaten Mr. Kirby, like it was originally supposed to happen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 19, 2011, 08:37:02 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 18, 2011, 02:19:53 PM
Jurassic Park has always been pretty family oriented, though. I agree that it was exaggerated in 3, but I don't want them to completely lost that element in the sequels. Kids should be able to enjoy Jurassic Park, too.

Key word is should. Kids are seeing worse things on TV everyday so I'm not sure why JP should be the exception. At least throw some blood like the second film did.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 19, 2011, 08:48:20 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 19, 2011, 08:37:02 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 18, 2011, 02:19:53 PM
Jurassic Park has always been pretty family oriented, though. I agree that it was exaggerated in 3, but I don't want them to completely lost that element in the sequels. Kids should be able to enjoy Jurassic Park, too.

Key word is should. Kids are seeing worse things on TV everyday so I'm not sure why JP should be the exception. At least throw some blood like the second film did.

I'm fine with all of that. I just don't want it to turn into a slasher with dinosaurs. I prefer the adventure feel of the films, as I'm sure most people do.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 19, 2011, 08:50:50 PM
I agree. I wasn't suggesting it become a slasher flick but take some risks at least.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 19, 2011, 08:52:22 PM
Yeah, my comment was directed more towards some of the earlier posts than at what you said :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Fujimaster on Jul 20, 2011, 11:32:04 AM
Quote from: AvatarIII on Jul 18, 2011, 02:39:21 PM
if anything i think the parents in 3 were too wimpy and the kid was too bad-ass in JP 1 and 2 we saw the kids be terrified and then harden underpressure, in 3, the kid was already totally hardened, and so the fact he was so "cool" was kind of annoying,

That kid had spent weeks running and hiding from Dinosaurs. The kids from the first two had spent one day on the island
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jul 20, 2011, 12:01:37 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 18, 2011, 02:19:53 PM
Jurassic Park has always been pretty family oriented, though.
I both agree and disagree... while the base plotline is there for all ages, there is another layer of depth to it, whether it be in the witty, well written dialogue, or scientific levels (talking the first two, more scientific is the first, obviously), but that's not necessarily needed to be understood by a younger audience for them to enjoy it (obviously). But I hate when they dumb it down to it being fairly-well unrecognizable when compared to Michael Crichton's vision Jurassic Park-- of course I'm talking about Jurassic Park III, which has disappointed me since I saw it as an eight year old.

I'd like to see a scarier Jurassic Park, not just on a dinosaur tensity level, but in terms of situation, scientific crisis, and industrial/jungle setting. I've alway wished since reading the book that Jurassic Park would have more of that under construction feel, only adding to the atmosphere. Stuff like seeing a raptor run across a road- that image always stuck with me from the novel because it fore-told of the coming crisis, and how shit already was a bit out of hand without the park's electricity going dead. I also liked the description of the vacant excavators and dumptrucks in the jungle clearings, sent of a really spooky atmosphere that I really wish they utilized more in the movie. But hey, not everything can be perfect, and I'm quite happy with what we've got.

But yes, to do with the level of violence, I think The Lost World did it best; that's not to say Muldoon's death wasn't appropriately horrific. I believe that the pacing of these death scenes can also be a bit more gut-wrenching, similar to scenes like Brett and Dallas' deaths in ALIEN. You knew it was going to happen, even suspected a couple moments when you were just so sure it was going to strike, but never did until the suspense had grown to it's absolute pinnacle.

JPIII had none of this, and I think, along with the weak characters, awful pacing, and lack of respect for the previous movies and their novels, that was the worst thing about it.

If they can expand upon the series in a positive way, awesome, but if they totally ruin the purpose of the series' best aspects again like they did with JPIII, I'll run through a warzone in nothing but my skin. This "totally different direction" thing has me concerned for my baby.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 20, 2011, 12:06:20 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Jul 20, 2011, 12:01:37 PM
my baby.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdinosaurspictures.net%2Fbaby-velociraptor.jpg&hash=4cc20cb5137a08e110b688fa1099fb9ea9b11777)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jul 20, 2011, 12:09:32 PM
Thanks for posting the pic, now I can post a perfect audio example of how I'd love the atmosphere of Jurassic Park to be  ;D:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcD4NV2GSDI# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcD4NV2GSDI#)

So tense. So, well, wonderful. And at the same time... terrifying.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Jul 20, 2011, 12:11:32 PM
And here I was expecting you to post this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0M-OTunDio# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0M-OTunDio#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jul 20, 2011, 12:13:06 PM
Quote from: Laufey on Jul 20, 2011, 12:11:32 PM
And here I was expecting you to post this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0M-OTunDio# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0M-OTunDio#)
Another great example, you've got it.  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 20, 2011, 12:17:28 PM
'Hatching Baby Raptor' is one of my favourite tracks from the Jurassic Park score, it just transpires sheer awesome from every second of it. And as Sweeper said, it's at the same time wonderful, and really, really eerie. There's something really mysterious in that chore.
The same track would be later re-used in Jurassic Park III, when the group gets to the laboratory. It gets remixed when Amanda Kirby sees the Raptor.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Jul 20, 2011, 12:59:05 PM
Quote from: Fujimaster on Jul 20, 2011, 11:32:04 AM
Quote from: AvatarIII on Jul 18, 2011, 02:39:21 PM
if anything i think the parents in 3 were too wimpy and the kid was too bad-ass in JP 1 and 2 we saw the kids be terrified and then harden underpressure, in 3, the kid was already totally hardened, and so the fact he was so "cool" was kind of annoying,

That kid had spent weeks running and hiding from Dinosaurs. The kids from the first two had spent one day on the island

i didn't say that it didn't make sense, i siad that it was annoying,
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: jacc.90 on Jul 20, 2011, 02:42:48 PM
Quote from: Fujimaster on Jul 20, 2011, 11:32:04 AM
Quote from: AvatarIII on Jul 18, 2011, 02:39:21 PM
if anything i think the parents in 3 were too wimpy and the kid was too bad-ass in JP 1 and 2 we saw the kids be terrified and then harden underpressure, in 3, the kid was already totally hardened, and so the fact he was so "cool" was kind of annoying,

That kid had spent weeks running and hiding from Dinosaurs. The kids from the first two had spent one day on the island
Dude, in the real life that kid fron the 3º movie would not exist. it's imposible survive alone that time in a f**king dinosaur island. do you remember how many people died in the 1º and 2º movie? omg i think that ,in that case, INGEN instead of hiring mercenaries from the 2nd movie should have hired Eric   :S
omg he had rex urine  ^^U seriously, is  believable?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Tangakkai on Jul 21, 2011, 11:05:03 AM
The third movie was just a mediocre rehash of the first film, lacking in character developement and originality. Only difference to it's far superior predecessor was the Spinosaurus and the Pteranodon scene.

So if I get another mediocre rehash with a 4th movie, I'm not interested
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Jul 22, 2011, 07:26:39 PM
Some info from Comic Con.

QuoteQuestion about Jurassic Park IV - has anything happened? Spielberg: "Yes it has, we have a story, I can happily announce right now." They have a writer and hopefully they are going to make Jurassic Park IV sometime in the near future.
http://comicbookmovie.com/fansites/joshw24/news/?a=42580 (http://comicbookmovie.com/fansites/joshw24/news/?a=42580)

There was another article that said "2-3 years" instead of "the near future", but that has been taken down. Probably because this one was put up first.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jul 22, 2011, 07:39:00 PM
Bring it on!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 22, 2011, 07:47:16 PM
Oh hell yes. Hope this isn't the usual bluff!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 23, 2011, 12:34:48 AM
Remember Stevie: no dino-soldiers!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 23, 2011, 01:42:42 AM
Quote from: Laufey on Jul 22, 2011, 07:26:39 PM
Some info from Comic Con.

QuoteQuestion about Jurassic Park IV - has anything happened? Spielberg: "Yes it has, we have a story, I can happily announce right now." They have a writer and hopefully they are going to make Jurassic Park IV sometime in the near future.
http://comicbookmovie.com/fansites/joshw24/news/?a=42580 (http://comicbookmovie.com/fansites/joshw24/news/?a=42580)

Finally!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Fujimaster on Jul 23, 2011, 11:48:17 AM
Quote from: jacc.90 on Jul 20, 2011, 02:42:48 PM
Quote from: Fujimaster on Jul 20, 2011, 11:32:04 AM
Quote from: AvatarIII on Jul 18, 2011, 02:39:21 PM
if anything i think the parents in 3 were too wimpy and the kid was too bad-ass in JP 1 and 2 we saw the kids be terrified and then harden underpressure, in 3, the kid was already totally hardened, and so the fact he was so "cool" was kind of annoying,

That kid had spent weeks running and hiding from Dinosaurs. The kids from the first two had spent one day on the island
Dude, in the real life that kid fron the 3º movie would not exist. it's imposible survive alone that time in a f**king dinosaur island. do you remember how many people died in the 1º and 2º movie? omg i think that ,in that case, INGEN instead of hiring mercenaries from the 2nd movie should have hired Eric   :S
omg he had rex urine  ^^U seriously, is  believable?
I was just saying you're comparing someone who has been there for weeks to someone that has been there for a day. Its easy to see him as hardened when you see him several weeks later, Meh I dont care, its a crap story anyway.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 23, 2011, 12:27:57 PM
Jee, it's Sci-fi. Eric survived the Island for that time, the mercs didn't make it for long... so what, Newt in Aliens survived a good load of space Locustas for a good time too, and the majority of the Marines were wasted off. It's very unlikely, buuut... who cares? Whine all you want about the execution, but the idea has nothing wrong in it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jul 23, 2011, 12:37:16 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jul 23, 2011, 12:27:57 PM
Jee, it's Sci-fi. Eric survived the Island for that time, the mercs didn't make it for long... so what, Newt in Aliens survived a good load of space Locustas for a good time too, and the majority of the Marines were wasted off. It's very unlikely, buuut... who cares? Whine all you want about the execution, but the idea has nothing wrong in it.

This.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jul 23, 2011, 12:38:50 PM
Just google stories of miraculous child survival stories and you'll find it's not so hard to believe it can happen, and some what frequently.

The hard to believe part is the ... ahem ... dinosaurs? And the ... uh ... xeno-morphs?

Spoiler
+10 cool points to who ever read that last line in Goldblum voice.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jul 23, 2011, 12:44:09 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lS9D6w1GzGY# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lS9D6w1GzGY#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jul 23, 2011, 01:37:45 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZHh9ckRC6M# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZHh9ckRC6M#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 23, 2011, 02:29:13 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Jul 23, 2011, 01:37:45 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZHh9ckRC6M# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZHh9ckRC6M#)

like
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 25, 2011, 07:25:13 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi848.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fab43%2FOmegaZilla95%2FJurassic%2520Park%2FTrexfullroar.jpg&hash=dc95e57bbe527716379c3c1b8d49360a388cb9d6)
Im in ur park
Roaring gloriously in ur fence
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DaddyYautja on Jul 25, 2011, 07:43:21 PM
I hope is going to be Jurassic Park: Chaos Effect!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jul 25, 2011, 07:46:14 PM
Quote from: Laufey on Jul 22, 2011, 07:26:39 PM

There was another article that said "2-3 years" instead of "the near future", but that has been taken down. Probably because this one was put up first.

So JP4 in 2013 or 2014 then? I think Joe Johnston can do a JP4 if you give him a good screenplay. He said sorry for the film and you can blame the writers for the movie. The directing for the movie was not too bad, I think people dislike JP3 because it did not feel like a Jurassic Park movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jul 25, 2011, 08:06:16 PM
I'd fine with Johnston directing it. As I've said before, JP3's problem was the script. Joe did a good enough job with what he was given.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: jacc.90 on Jul 26, 2011, 01:17:41 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jul 25, 2011, 07:25:13 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi848.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fab43%2FOmegaZilla95%2FJurassic%2520Park%2FTrexfullroar.jpg&hash=dc95e57bbe527716379c3c1b8d49360a388cb9d6)
Im in ur park
Roaring gloriously in ur fence

(L)

XD
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 26, 2011, 05:41:09 AM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Jul 25, 2011, 07:46:14 PM
Quote from: Laufey on Jul 22, 2011, 07:26:39 PM

There was another article that said "2-3 years" instead of "the near future", but that has been taken down. Probably because this one was put up first.

So JP4 in 2013 or 2014 then? I think Joe Johnston can do a JP4 if you give him a good screenplay. He said sorry for the film and you can blame the writers for the movie. The directing for the movie was not too bad, I think people dislike JP3 because it did not feel like a Jurassic Park movie.

It felt like a Jurassic Park movie alright. Just not a good one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DJ Pu$$yface on Jul 26, 2011, 08:39:02 AM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Jul 25, 2011, 07:46:14 PM
Quote from: Laufey on Jul 22, 2011, 07:26:39 PM

There was another article that said "2-3 years" instead of "the near future", but that has been taken down. Probably because this one was put up first.

So JP4 in 2013 or 2014 then? I think Joe Johnston can do a JP4 if you give him a good screenplay. He said sorry for the film and you can blame the writers for the movie. The directing for the movie was not too bad, I think people dislike JP3 because it did not feel like a Jurassic Park movie.

That T-Rex  vs Spino fight should have been cut right the f**k out. Or leave it ambigous. Not piss me off beyond belief.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Aug 02, 2011, 12:42:13 PM
Heard Universal is aiming for a 2013 release. Maybe it'll get greenlight by the end of this year when the script is solid enough. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 02, 2011, 12:52:55 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Aug 02, 2011, 12:42:13 PM
Heard Universal is aiming for a 2013 release. Maybe it'll get greenlight by the end of this year when the script is solid enough. :P

One can only hope.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Aug 02, 2011, 12:54:22 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Aug 02, 2011, 12:42:13 PM
Heard Universal is aiming for a 2013 release. Maybe it'll get greenlight by the end of this year when the script is solid enough. :P

I really hope to see a mosasaur in jurassic park some day =)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 02, 2011, 12:59:20 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on Aug 02, 2011, 12:54:22 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Aug 02, 2011, 12:42:13 PM
Heard Universal is aiming for a 2013 release. Maybe it'll get greenlight by the end of this year when the script is solid enough. :P

I really hope to see a mosasaur in jurassic park some day =)

If they ever add any water reptiles in a Jurassic Park film it has to be done tastefully. None of this oh they circle the island in the ocean rubbish. I wanna see them in a massive controlled concrete lake or something.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Aug 02, 2011, 02:33:44 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Aug 02, 2011, 12:59:20 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on Aug 02, 2011, 12:54:22 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Aug 02, 2011, 12:42:13 PM
Heard Universal is aiming for a 2013 release. Maybe it'll get greenlight by the end of this year when the script is solid enough. :P

I really hope to see a mosasaur in jurassic park some day =)

If they ever add any water reptiles in a Jurassic Park film it has to be done tastefully. None of this oh they circle the island in the ocean rubbish. I wanna see them in a massive controlled concrete lake or something.

Yeah ofcourse. i mean if they are in the open sea they could've been anywhere right now. don't even begin about breeding or anything. so yeah a controlled lake would be cool. or a big fish tank or anything.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Aug 02, 2011, 02:56:34 PM
As much as I would not really like having Aquatic reptiles in a Jurassic Park movie, a creature held in some sort of man made lagoon like in MEG would be very cool. As you guys said, it'd have to be tasteful, and for me they'd have to think of a good logical way for the creature to be created.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 02, 2011, 09:46:54 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Aug 02, 2011, 02:56:34 PM
for me they'd have to think of a good logical way for the creature to be created.

Dinosaur ate marine reptile that washed up on shore, died on a beach and other animals tore it open, Mosquito landed on corpse sucked blood from dinosaurs exposed stomach and got full of Sea reptile DNA. InGen clones it millions of years later.

Bish bash bosh, done.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Aug 02, 2011, 09:48:54 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Aug 02, 2011, 09:46:54 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Aug 02, 2011, 02:56:34 PM
for me they'd have to think of a good logical way for the creature to be created.

Dinosaur ate marine reptile that washed up on shore, died on a beach and other animals tore it open, Mosquito landed on corpse sucked blood from dinosaurs exposed stomach and got full of Sea reptile DNA. InGen clones it millions of years later.

Bish bash bosh, done.

That would work.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 02, 2011, 09:53:54 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Aug 02, 2011, 09:48:54 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Aug 02, 2011, 09:46:54 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Aug 02, 2011, 02:56:34 PM
for me they'd have to think of a good logical way for the creature to be created.

Dinosaur ate marine reptile that washed up on shore, died on a beach and other animals tore it open, Mosquito landed on corpse sucked blood from dinosaurs exposed stomach and got full of Sea reptile DNA. InGen clones it millions of years later.

Bish bash bosh, done.

That would work.

Although, it would have to be a Mosquito with one hell of a long Proboscis.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Aug 02, 2011, 09:55:20 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Aug 02, 2011, 09:53:54 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Aug 02, 2011, 09:48:54 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Aug 02, 2011, 09:46:54 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Aug 02, 2011, 02:56:34 PM
for me they'd have to think of a good logical way for the creature to be created.

Dinosaur ate marine reptile that washed up on shore, died on a beach and other animals tore it open, Mosquito landed on corpse sucked blood from dinosaurs exposed stomach and got full of Sea reptile DNA. InGen clones it millions of years later.

Bish bash bosh, done.

That would work.

Although, it would have to be a Mosquito with one hell of a long Proboscis.

Implying a Hollywood writer/casual moviegoer would give a f**k. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 02, 2011, 09:57:58 PM
Yeah  :D lets not forget they did show a talking raptor in JP/// before the characters even got to the island.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Aug 02, 2011, 10:34:32 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Aug 02, 2011, 09:57:58 PM
Yeah  :D lets not forget they did show a talking raptor in JP/// before the characters even got to the island.

I hate that scene so much for multiple reasons. first there is no way alan grant could know about the new raptor look. so how is it even possible for him to dream about it. also the whole talking raptor scene was way too cartoony. not the style of a jurassic park movie. i hoped jp3 was more serieus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on Aug 02, 2011, 11:22:48 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__UjBbz2PoA#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__UjBbz2PoA#ws)

It should be posted at least once per page.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Aug 02, 2011, 11:31:21 PM
Quote from: Bad Replicant on Aug 02, 2011, 11:22:48 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__UjBbz2PoA#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__UjBbz2PoA#ws)

It should be posted at least once per page.

Will do.

I can't believe they got away with keeping this scene in the finished product.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Aug 03, 2011, 12:15:12 AM
Such a stain... and an embarrassment.

Oh, I meant the scene, but yeah, the movie was shit in general.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Huol on Aug 03, 2011, 12:16:01 AM
Quote from: Bad Replicant on Aug 02, 2011, 11:22:48 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__UjBbz2PoA#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__UjBbz2PoA#ws)

It should be posted at least once per page.


I can't stop laughing christ
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Aug 03, 2011, 12:17:46 AM
i don't get what's so bad about it. it's not much more ridiculous than the "hahaha! you didn't say the magic word!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Huol on Aug 03, 2011, 12:18:40 AM
Its a talking dinosaur man

its hysterical
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Aug 03, 2011, 12:42:18 AM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Aug 03, 2011, 12:17:46 AM
i don't get what's so bad about it. it's not much more ridiculous than the "hahaha! you didn't say the magic word!"
In a Jurassic Park movie? The little block-trolling Dennis did just showed how much of a sniveling bag of dicks he was; this is a dream with a talking raptor taking the place of Grant's friend. It's like they just turned into a sit-com.

Hilarious, but full retard. Sad to consider that it's part of the same series as Jurassic Park and TLW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Aug 03, 2011, 12:54:23 AM
bet you would have loved that if the movie was good.

it's the least of it's problems, that's what i'm saying.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Aug 03, 2011, 01:03:52 AM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Aug 03, 2011, 12:54:23 AM
bet you would have loved that if the movie was good.
Ha, nope. If the movie was good, that wouldn't have been in there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Aug 03, 2011, 01:18:06 AM
Quote from: Huol on Aug 03, 2011, 12:18:40 AM
Its a talking dinosaur man

its hysterical

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freefunnyjunk.info%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F03%2Fpedo-barney.jpg&hash=6aff87e14812ea48bf53bac67d17e0a8da8d842a)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 03, 2011, 02:46:49 AM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Aug 03, 2011, 12:17:46 AM
i don't get what's so bad about it. it's not much more ridiculous than the "hahaha! you didn't say the magic word!"

Aw come on, that was hilarious.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Aug 03, 2011, 11:49:32 AM
I was creeped out by the scene as a child, but I thought it wasn't the Raptor talking. I thought, instead, that the Raptor made some sort of sound (that was the 'jump-scare' OST of the sequence), and then Billy's voice came from over the dream. When I re-watched the film and noticed how it really is, I changed opinion on it, but it's not really somethign down-grading.
Come on guys, let's remember the scene was a dream. Incredible things can happen in dreams. Perhaps the intention was to show Grant's fear that Raptors may take their intelligence too far, and that is not 'expressed' in a logical way in this dream.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Aug 03, 2011, 12:08:51 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Aug 03, 2011, 11:49:32 AM
Perhaps the intention was to
aaaand I'm out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Aug 03, 2011, 12:11:00 PM
You always were.

Spoiler
J-k!
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Aug 03, 2011, 12:15:54 PM
I like the idea of grant having nightmares about raptors and their intelligence.
But NOT in the way it was excecuted in jp3. in jp3 it was just some kinds of strange kid humor :/
Also the scene after the spino killed the rex. we see the spino's head turn and then we hear a breaking noise of some kind. it is grant hitting kirby but still. It also was a failed attempt at "humor" of some sorts.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Aug 03, 2011, 12:37:20 PM
Ha, as a kid, I was plenty of confused at that last one. I thought it was the Spinosaurus hitting a branch or something.
Oh my JPIII. What are you. There's some great things about you, yet you keep coming with nasty (not in a good way!) ideas here and here, like the magical military at the end, which I've never understood, even as a kid. Or the territorially maniac Spinosaurus. Or the magically changing Sorna.
I'll always have a spot for you, though. You're not as good as your predecessors, not in a million years, but you're still cool somehow.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Aug 03, 2011, 03:45:27 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on Aug 03, 2011, 12:15:54 PM
I like the idea of grant having nightmares about raptors and their intelligence.
But NOT in the way it was excecuted in jp3. in jp3 it was just some kinds of strange kid humor :/
Also the scene after the spino killed the rex. we see the spino's head turn and then we hear a breaking noise of some kind. it is grant hitting kirby but still. It also was a failed attempt at "humor" of some sorts.

Kung Fu Spinosaurus

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 03, 2011, 09:56:59 PM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Aug 03, 2011, 12:17:46 AM
i don't get what's so bad about it. it's not much more ridiculous than the "hahaha! you didn't say the magic word!"

It is way more ridiculous.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Aug 03, 2011, 11:38:48 PM
Quotehahaha! you didn't say the magic word!
that was a great moment in jurassic park. not too far fetched and a lot of fun :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 04, 2011, 04:46:29 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Aug 03, 2011, 11:49:32 AM
I was creeped out by the scene as a child, but I thought it wasn't the Raptor talking. I thought, instead, that the Raptor made some sort of sound (that was the 'jump-scare' OST of the sequence), and then Billy's voice came from over the dream. When I re-watched the film and noticed how it really is, I changed opinion on it, but it's not really somethign down-grading.
Come on guys, let's remember the scene was a dream. Incredible things can happen in dreams. Perhaps the intention was to show Grant's fear that Raptors may take their intelligence too far, and that is not 'expressed' in a logical way in this dream.

Jurassic Park is above cheesy, clichéd dream sequences. That's why it sucked.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Aug 04, 2011, 04:53:11 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Aug 03, 2011, 12:37:20 PM
Or the magically changing Sorna.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4CofbOiKj0#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4CofbOiKj0#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Aug 04, 2011, 07:59:51 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Aug 04, 2011, 04:53:11 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Aug 03, 2011, 12:37:20 PM
Or the magically changing Sorna.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4CofbOiKj0#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4CofbOiKj0#ws)

:D :D :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Aug 04, 2011, 09:56:19 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Aug 03, 2011, 09:56:59 PM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Aug 03, 2011, 12:17:46 AM
i don't get what's so bad about it. it's not much more ridiculous than the "hahaha! you didn't say the magic word!"

It is way more ridiculous.

i agree, one is one of the characters having a sense of humour, the other is a character having a dream about a type of raptor he's never even seen before
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Aug 04, 2011, 11:01:37 AM
The talking raptor scene (I'm sure) was supposed to be a twisted, odd dream-logic attempt at foreshadowing Raptors being able to communicate intelligently with one another. It certainly didn't come off that way on film. It's pretty goofy, to the point of being "The Mask" or "Hook" ... It just didn't fit with a Jurassic Park film. It might have played a little better if it was darker ... and the voice was at least more beastly. If they'd have made it a more like the snakeman sequence from Dreamscape it would have kept us from laughing (as hard.)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 04, 2011, 06:46:15 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Aug 04, 2011, 11:01:37 AM
It might have played a little better if it was darker ... and the voice was at least more beastly. If they'd have made it a more like the snakeman sequence from Dreamscape it would have kept us from laughing (as hard.)

No, no, no.

Jurassic Park, The Lost World have no dream sequences even if it was darker it shouldn't belong it wasn't the JP way.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Aug 04, 2011, 06:49:02 PM
A nightmare involving a raptor I can dig. A nightmare involving a talking raptor I cant dig.

It just didnt have the desired effect at all and it came across as laughable and audiences thought it was a cheap joke which I hope wasnt the intention.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TheMonolith on Aug 04, 2011, 09:35:03 PM
Sometimes silence is golden. When I first saw that scene I wasn't mad, but very confused. That single word took away the atmosphere of an originally a tried and true but still clichéd moment.
I can get what they were attempting to do because when you come out of a dream, often the lines get blurred. You will see things from a dream in the room with you for a few seconds, be confused as to where you are, and have subjects of the dream talk to you in the voice of someone who is close by like Dr. Grant saw.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 05, 2011, 03:32:18 AM
If it was a raptor chasing Grant and almost being eaten that would've worked. At least Grant would have been reliving a dark moment.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Aug 05, 2011, 03:53:53 AM
Quote from: Keg on Aug 04, 2011, 06:49:02 PM
audiences thought it was a cheap joke which I hope wasnt the intention.
What with the rest of the movie, it more than likely was.

Quote from: Alien³ on Aug 04, 2011, 06:46:15 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Aug 04, 2011, 11:01:37 AM
It might have played a little better if it was darker ... and the voice was at least more beastly. If they'd have made it a more like the snakeman sequence from Dreamscape it would have kept us from laughing (as hard.)

No, no, no.

Jurassic Park, The Lost World have no dream sequences even if it was darker it shouldn't belong it wasn't the JP way.
Exactly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nope on Aug 05, 2011, 04:11:54 PM
I don't know. I think a geniunly scary nightmare sequence could work.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Aug 05, 2011, 04:51:05 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Aug 04, 2011, 06:46:15 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Aug 04, 2011, 11:01:37 AM
It might have played a little better if it was darker ... and the voice was at least more beastly. If they'd have made it a more like the snakeman sequence from Dreamscape it would have kept us from laughing (as hard.)

No, no, no.

Jurassic Park, The Lost World have no dream sequences even if it was darker it shouldn't belong it wasn't the JP way.

I'm not advocating the quality of the dream sequence by saying ... your logic behind it not being included is weak at best. There was also no Spinosaurus or Ceratosaurus in either films so following your rule there is no place for them in part 3. There were no shots of kids playing with rubber dinosaurs, or father/son para-sailing, or subterranean ghillie suit wearing preteens in either film either. Maybe if he knew gymnastics ...

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 05, 2011, 05:57:08 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Aug 05, 2011, 04:51:05 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Aug 04, 2011, 06:46:15 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Aug 04, 2011, 11:01:37 AM
It might have played a little better if it was darker ... and the voice was at least more beastly. If they'd have made it a more like the snakeman sequence from Dreamscape it would have kept us from laughing (as hard.)

No, no, no.

Jurassic Park, The Lost World have no dream sequences even if it was darker it shouldn't belong it wasn't the JP way.

I'm not advocating the quality of the dream sequence by saying ... your logic behind it not being included is weak at best. There was also no Spinosaurus or Ceratosaurus in either films so following your rule there is no place for them in part 3. There were no shots of kids playing with rubber dinosaurs, or father/son para-sailing, or subterranean ghillie suit wearing preteens in either film either. Maybe if he knew gymnastics ...

That isn't what I was saying at all. That wasn't my rule. My rule was no dream sequences at all in JP, no matter how well executed because (as established by the previous two films) dream sequences don't fit with the over all style of the Jurassic Park films.

The Spinosaurus and Ceratosaurus, kids playing with rubber dinosaurs, or father/son para-sailing etc belong because it is within the real world in which the characters are in. They are real, no matter how stupid some of those may be like the  subterranean ghillie suit wearing kid.

I'm all for breaking convention etc but after two films of JP it had its style and structure set so the dream sequence in JP/// shouldn't have been made.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 05, 2011, 08:24:12 PM
I see where you're coming from and to an extent I agree because dream sequences annoy the hell out of me but if they're done well I'm willing to let them go.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Aug 15, 2011, 01:20:29 PM
I rewatched part tres yesterday and I never quite gave much attention to how the Spinosaurus' strength is convenient to what the script calls for. The beast is not able to break through some trees, but later it can smash through a reinforced steel fence, designed to contain Dinosaurs. Right after, it can't break a comparatively thin door, and it can't pop the boat cage open later in the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Aug 18, 2011, 07:12:21 PM
So I just finished reading Jurassic Park, absolutely loved it. I read both books five years ago when I was younger, so I didn't completely understand them then, but I still enjoyed the books. This time, with a better understanding, I again loved Jurassic Park.

But I have one question:
Spoiler
At the end of the book, Malcolm dies. I completely forgot about that from the first time I read it. How did Crichton bring him back for the second book? I know it was easy to bring him back in the movie, because he survived Jurassic Park in the movie. Did they just say the doctors made a mistake or something? Like I said, it was a long time ago, I read JP and TLW, so I forget the circumstances.
[close]

Thanks to whoever answers the question! :)

Now, I need to watch the movie, and prepare my comparison presentation.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Aug 18, 2011, 07:18:45 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Aug 18, 2011, 07:12:21 PMBut I have one question:

Spoiler
At the end of the book, Malcolm dies. I completely forgot about that from the first time I read it. How did Crichton bring him back for the second book? I know it was easy to bring him back in the movie, because he survived Jurassic Park in the movie. Did they just say the doctors made a mistake or something? Like I said, it was a long time ago, I read JP and TLW, so I forget the circumstances.
[close]
Spoiler
QuoteHe is given high doses of morphine, and supposedly eventually dies from his injuries. However, it is revealed in the sequel novel, The Lost World, that he survived thanks to timely intervention by Costa Rican surgeons, but ended up partially crippled and walking with a cane.
Don't remember the book very well myself, but I trust Wikipedia is correct on this.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jurassic_Park_characters#Dr._Ian_Malcolm (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jurassic_Park_characters#Dr._Ian_Malcolm)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Aug 18, 2011, 07:19:12 PM
Well ...

Spoiler
I don't believe he ever addressed it. In The Lost World it simply said it was rumored that he had died. If I remember correctly, in Jurassic Park some asked "Where's Malcolm?" and someone else shakes their head grimly. Implying that he didn't make it.
[close]

But the real reason was probably

Spoiler
Because he had advance knowledge that Jeff was ready for Jurassic Park 2 and the others weren't so ... yeah. Economics.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Aug 18, 2011, 07:23:26 PM
Thanks guys. And yeah, Bat, your first spoiler is true. Just read that page about 10 minutes ago. :)

I was surprised by how different the book and the movie were. I love both, but for different reasons. The raptor nest was great in the novel, but I don't think it would have worked very well on screen. Both versions of the story are great for the medium in which they are presented. If I had to choose one version, I would probably say the movie, because it was such a huge part of my childhood (and dat music :D ), but the novel was also excellent.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Aug 18, 2011, 07:25:09 PM
Seeing as how you just read the book, I'm just a bit curious how you feel about this. ;)

http://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=38011.msg1164696#msg1164696 (http://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=38011.msg1164696#msg1164696)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Aug 18, 2011, 07:30:23 PM
I actually saw that post about a week ago, but didn't want to comment because I wasn't finished reading. thanks for showing it to me again :D

Despite not knowing all the actors, they all certainly look the part. And the ones that I do know, I think would make excellent choices. Great job with the casting, Shas Lauf :)



Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Aug 29, 2011, 05:05:43 PM
Jurassic Park will once again be shown on the big screen. :)

http://comicbookmovie.com/fansites/debbiedowner/news/?a=45397 (http://comicbookmovie.com/fansites/debbiedowner/news/?a=45397)

Click the link to check out the trailer for the re-release.

Man, I wish they would do something like that over here as well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Aug 29, 2011, 05:08:15 PM
God, I hope that's here. I have to see that. I just have to see that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on Aug 29, 2011, 05:13:18 PM
Aw, no fair.

UK dino hogs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Huol on Aug 29, 2011, 05:28:30 PM
I would kill to see that on the big screen.

wait oh god empire?

does that mean its in the uk?

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sharp Sticks on Aug 29, 2011, 05:35:05 PM
Da.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Huol on Aug 29, 2011, 05:37:37 PM
HA HA

First Back to the future and now this.
eeeeeeeeee
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on Aug 29, 2011, 09:25:50 PM
Jurassic Park theatrical re-release

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp%2Fs-460look6.jpg&hash=a6171ecea93a8e2f0f02276ed5df2a532d61e760)
[close]

UK only

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp%2Fs-505two1.jpg&hash=76e9088243d3083a0b1e57816db31f74b1ae3db7)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Aug 29, 2011, 09:32:28 PM
Oh man, I need to go see that.

EDIT: Wait, UK only :'(

Spoiler
:'(
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Purebreedalien on Aug 29, 2011, 09:32:58 PM
Despite this being in the UK there's a 99% chance it won't be at my crappy local cinema.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on Aug 29, 2011, 11:09:42 PM
Quote from: Laufey on Aug 29, 2011, 05:05:43 PM
Jurassic Park will once again be shown on the big screen. :)

http://comicbookmovie.com/fansites/debbiedowner/news/?a=45397 (http://comicbookmovie.com/fansites/debbiedowner/news/?a=45397)

Click the link to check out the trailer for the re-release.

Man, I wish they would do something like that over here as well.

Seriously? Only Britain? That sucks.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 30, 2011, 02:04:37 AM
f**k that noise. With the amount of money that will make, I am almost certain they will re-release the films in NA.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on Aug 30, 2011, 03:58:10 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Aug 30, 2011, 02:04:37 AM
f**k that noise. With the amount of money that will make, I am almost certain they will re-release the films in NA.

Yeah more than likely.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Sep 01, 2011, 04:27:20 PM
Quote from: Bad Replicant on Aug 29, 2011, 09:25:50 PM
Jurassic Park theatrical re-release

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp%2Fs-460look6.jpg&hash=a6171ecea93a8e2f0f02276ed5df2a532d61e760)
[close]

UK only

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp%2Fs-505two1.jpg&hash=76e9088243d3083a0b1e57816db31f74b1ae3db7)
[close]

f**k!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Huol on Sep 01, 2011, 04:51:21 PM
Quote from: Bad Replicant on Aug 29, 2011, 09:25:50 PM
Jurassic Park theatrical re-release

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp%2Fs-460look6.jpg&hash=a6171ecea93a8e2f0f02276ed5df2a532d61e760)
[close]

UK only

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp%2Fs-505two1.jpg&hash=76e9088243d3083a0b1e57816db31f74b1ae3db7)
[close]


Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Aug 29, 2011, 09:32:28 PM
Oh man, I need to go see that.

EDIT: Wait, UK only :'(

Spoiler
:'(
[close]

Quote from: Ghost Rider on Aug 29, 2011, 11:09:42 PM
Quote from: Laufey on Aug 29, 2011, 05:05:43 PM
Jurassic Park will once again be shown on the big screen. :)

http://comicbookmovie.com/fansites/debbiedowner/news/?a=45397 (http://comicbookmovie.com/fansites/debbiedowner/news/?a=45397)

Click the link to check out the trailer for the re-release.

Man, I wish they would do something like that over here as well.

Seriously? Only Britain? That sucks.



Quote from: Requiem28 on Sep 01, 2011, 04:27:20 PM
Quote from: Bad Replicant on Aug 29, 2011, 09:25:50 PM
Jurassic Park theatrical re-release

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp%2Fs-460look6.jpg&hash=a6171ecea93a8e2f0f02276ed5df2a532d61e760)
[close]

UK only

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp%2Fs-505two1.jpg&hash=76e9088243d3083a0b1e57816db31f74b1ae3db7)
[close]

f**k!



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBxgAmdPQWg#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBxgAmdPQWg#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Aeus on Sep 01, 2011, 04:53:07 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0S-VACAYIPQ# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0S-VACAYIPQ#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 01, 2011, 08:17:18 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.4freaks.com%2Fmedia%2F201123%2F53c56e80cda3ee0f2ca8fd5890afb57b.jpg&hash=0033fbf2c2be7c4264877a32c571637c28a3643d)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Sep 01, 2011, 08:27:59 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg846.imageshack.us%2Fimg846%2F39%2Fjpmondo.jpg&hash=cda4acde9f98d02c777ef8ce116e6c340dfaeaaa)

Stunning.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 01, 2011, 08:35:11 PM
What is that??
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Sep 01, 2011, 08:39:26 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 01, 2011, 08:35:11 PM
What is that??
http://shocktillyoudrop.com/news/topnews.php?id=20747 (http://shocktillyoudrop.com/news/topnews.php?id=20747)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 20, 2011, 02:48:12 PM
4 days until I will be sitting in one of the uks biggest cinemas watching my favourite film of all time  :D
Oh boy am I excited!!!

Dun der! Dun der! Der ner ner, ner ner ner nerrr!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 20, 2011, 04:13:39 PM
Piss. Off.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Sep 20, 2011, 04:31:28 PM
Quote from: Laufey on Sep 01, 2011, 08:27:59 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg846.imageshack.us%2Fimg846%2F39%2Fjpmondo.jpg&hash=cda4acde9f98d02c777ef8ce116e6c340dfaeaaa)

Stunning.
I like it, it just fails to convey the tone of JP in any way.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightlord on Sep 20, 2011, 04:42:54 PM
Awesomeness Jurassic Park is going into cinemas over here to.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPoYzyOn44M# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPoYzyOn44M#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Xenoborg on Sep 20, 2011, 04:45:09 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 20, 2011, 02:48:12 PM
Dun der! Dun der! Der ner ner, ner ner ner nerrr!
:laugh:

I can't wait too!
I wanna play Operation Genesis!  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 20, 2011, 06:02:33 PM
Who else pre-ordered the Blu-Ray set? My lovely girlfriend bought me the Collector's Set ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MudButt on Sep 20, 2011, 06:06:34 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 20, 2011, 06:02:33 PM
Who else pre-ordered the Blu-Ray set? My lovely girlfriend bought me the Collector's Set ;D ;D ;D

Marry Her.
NAO.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Sep 20, 2011, 06:14:37 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 20, 2011, 06:02:33 PM
Who else pre-ordered the Blu-Ray set? My lovely girlfriend bought me the Collector's Set ;D ;D ;D
You lucky man haha.
And yes marry her.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Vecrotus on Sep 20, 2011, 06:17:54 PM
After getting the Star Wars: The Complete Saga on blu-ray, I'm looking forward to getting this series on blu-ray. If the original Star Wars trilogy can offer excellent picture and sound quality, I see no reason why Jurassic Park couldn't.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on Sep 20, 2011, 07:55:11 PM
Buying it for Christmas. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Vecrotus on Sep 20, 2011, 07:56:30 PM
Too long for me, but that would be a nice present. Good idea.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Sep 20, 2011, 09:35:19 PM
I guess I'll have to get a Blu Ray Player now.....ONLY if it has the teaser for JPIV in it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Vecrotus on Sep 20, 2011, 10:01:15 PM
That would be a cool extra.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Sep 21, 2011, 12:31:28 PM
The definite thing in the set that'd make me happy would be an isolated theatrical score... like in the Alien Anthology.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 21, 2011, 01:23:53 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Sep 20, 2011, 09:35:19 PM
I guess I'll have to get a Blu Ray Player now.....ONLY if it has the teaser for JPIV in it.

There is no teaser. Loose the pipe, homie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Sep 21, 2011, 04:36:56 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 21, 2011, 01:23:53 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Sep 20, 2011, 09:35:19 PM
I guess I'll have to get a Blu Ray Player now.....ONLY if it has the teaser for JPIV in it.

There is no teaser. Loose the pipe, homie.

I Kid. I kid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Vecrotus on Sep 21, 2011, 04:56:51 PM
It would be a neat addition though, but it's just too early.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 23, 2011, 07:54:37 AM
Seeing this tonight! It's going to bring tears to my eyes when we first get a glimpse at the brachiosaurus  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Sep 23, 2011, 12:21:12 PM
You crazy son of a bitch, you did it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Vecrotus on Sep 23, 2011, 04:05:11 PM
Looking forward to getting this on Blu-ray sometime after it comes out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 24, 2011, 12:26:36 AM
Have just come back from watching the original JP at the cinema. Few words can describe the experience I had  ;D
Anyways here is my short review...

http://allaboutfilm.tumblr.com/post/10575698116/jurassic-park-2011-re-release-a-group-comprised (http://allaboutfilm.tumblr.com/post/10575698116/jurassic-park-2011-re-release-a-group-comprised)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gazz on Sep 24, 2011, 07:33:50 PM
Just got back from watching the digital print and I must say that I love that film just as much as I ever did as a wide eyed little kid back in the year of '93
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 25, 2011, 10:04:50 AM
Quote from: Gazz on Sep 24, 2011, 07:33:50 PM
Just got back from watching the digital print and I must say that I love that film just as much as I ever did as a wide eyed little kid back in the year of '93

Amen to that!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Sep 25, 2011, 01:02:01 PM
I remember it being very loud in the theater upon original release as well. I remember thinking that the T-Rex roar would probably drown out the trite dialogue exchanges in the next door showing of 'What's Love Got To Do With It?'
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Sep 26, 2011, 02:22:22 AM
Does anyone know what the exclusive bonus features are for the JP Blu-Ray Trilogy?  I believe there's going to be some kinda doc about the making of the Telltale Game JP Game, but that's all I know right now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: cloverfan98 on Sep 26, 2011, 02:47:38 AM
Does anyone know why we poor guys in the US did not get JP back in cinemas?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on Sep 26, 2011, 02:42:21 PM
Quote from: cloverfan98 on Sep 26, 2011, 02:47:38 AM
Does anyone know why we poor guys in the US did not get JP back in cinemas?
We aren't good enough.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Sep 26, 2011, 02:57:38 PM
it's probably for financial reasons.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gazz on Sep 26, 2011, 03:38:46 PM
Also, another thing about seeing the film at the cinema again...

Dat John Williams

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F_MqMPnC_qrUE%2FTJbcekGf5LI%2FAAAAAAAAAz8%2FV0tLOywB8Rk%2Fs320%2Fdat_ass.jpg&hash=03d60cb3f09c2bede68f6568aa81d48886466985)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 26, 2011, 04:28:01 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on Sep 26, 2011, 02:57:38 PM
it's probably for financial reasons.

The American cinemas can't afford to play JP movies? :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Sep 27, 2011, 09:49:27 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 26, 2011, 04:28:01 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on Sep 26, 2011, 02:57:38 PM
it's probably for financial reasons.

The American cinemas can't afford to play JP movies? :P

no i was thinking more along the lines of them not thinking that it would be profitable, whereas in the UK, there are less theatres, and less profit potential anyway, so there would be less to lose.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 27, 2011, 01:04:48 PM
It sounds plausible enough. Given how poorly, comparatively speaking, JP III did in theatres they wouldn't make much money.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Vecrotus on Sep 27, 2011, 09:08:27 PM
Which makes me worry about what the box-office will say about a potential Jurassic Park 4.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Sep 27, 2011, 09:12:20 PM
At least we got Terra Nova right now to keep us entertained with dinosaurs before a potential Jurassic Park movie  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Vecrotus on Sep 27, 2011, 09:17:05 PM
I don't think that a dinosaur movie will make as much of an impact in cinemas as much as it did ten years ago. I think dinosaurs nowadays are better suited to television.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Sep 27, 2011, 09:28:43 PM
I'm afraid the ruined teens nowadays are not satisfied with Dinosaurs anymore. They want bad horror movies with a lot of blood. Just like a lot of people love the avp movies and don't even know about the original alien and/or predator movies
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Vecrotus on Sep 27, 2011, 09:31:48 PM
I still am looking forward to the dinosaurs of Jurassic Park grace the screens again. With the advancements in computing technology, there's no reason for them to look better than they ever did before.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Sep 27, 2011, 09:33:49 PM
Yeah i guess if a new Jurassic Park movie is in the works i would be as exited as if it was an alien/predator movie  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 28, 2011, 03:56:43 AM
Quote from: Snowdog on Sep 27, 2011, 09:28:43 PM
I'm afraid the ruined teens nowadays are not satisfied with Dinosaurs anymore. They want bad horror movies with a lot of blood. Just like a lot of people love the avp movies and don't even know about the original alien and/or predator movies

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fthe-office.com%2Fbedtime-story%2Fpig-helen.gif&hash=4ea2865ebbe0c9c6709d8c01fd3f65139557b640)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Sep 28, 2011, 04:13:54 AM
Quote from: Snowdog on Sep 27, 2011, 09:12:20 PM
At least we got Terra Nova right now to keep us entertained with dinosaurs before a potential Jurassic Park movie  ;D

That's about to start here, and from the trailers the dinosaurs look like something from The Asylum.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Sep 28, 2011, 04:19:47 AM
Quote from: Snowdog on Sep 27, 2011, 09:28:43 PM
I'm afraid the ruined teens nowadays are not satisfied with Dinosaurs anymore. They want bad horror movies with a lot of blood.

and how can Dinosaurs fail to deliver this?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Sep 28, 2011, 04:23:09 AM
And in other news, water is wet.

Teenagers have always wanted bad horror movies with lots of blood.  Otherwise there wouldn't be a stack of Friday the 13th movies.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Sep 28, 2011, 04:26:20 AM
..... Ah
.... Buh
.... Er
.... Not all teena-
Ah screw it
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Sep 28, 2011, 05:23:22 AM
do you consider you a teenager?

mentally, i mean.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Crazy Rich on Sep 28, 2011, 05:51:11 AM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Sep 28, 2011, 04:19:47 AM
Quote from: Snowdog on Sep 27, 2011, 09:28:43 PM
I'm afraid the ruined teens nowadays are not satisfied with Dinosaurs anymore. They want bad horror movies with a lot of blood.

and how can Dinosaurs fail to deliver this?
Exactly.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0wP4rP6R70# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0wP4rP6R70#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Sep 28, 2011, 06:44:16 AM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Sep 28, 2011, 05:23:22 AM
do you consider you a teenager?

mentally, i mean.
Kind of, yeah.
I'm still a sort of dumbass fun loving teen, I'm just seasoned from some hardships and abuse in my life, so I do have some differentiating thoughts and behaviors. And the fact that I don't want to be like those abusers set up my moral code, and my decisions in life. I mean, I most certainly don't consider myself a child, and I don't consider myself an adult by a long shot so... Yeah.
Why do you ask, monsieur Chupa?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Sep 28, 2011, 07:08:27 AM
Quote from: Cap. Fitzgerald on Sep 28, 2011, 06:44:16 AM
Why do you ask, monsieur Chupa?
Because if so, you'll find it's quite easy to seperate yourself from general 'teens'.


SO ANYWAYS, JURASSIC PARK, HUH?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on Sep 28, 2011, 10:14:47 AM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Sep 28, 2011, 05:51:11 AM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Sep 28, 2011, 04:19:47 AM
Quote from: Snowdog on Sep 27, 2011, 09:28:43 PM
I'm afraid the ruined teens nowadays are not satisfied with Dinosaurs anymore. They want bad horror movies with a lot of blood.

and how can Dinosaurs fail to deliver this?
Exactly.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0wP4rP6R70# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0wP4rP6R70#)

Oh god I remember that. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Crazy Rich on Sep 28, 2011, 10:23:30 AM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Sep 28, 2011, 10:14:47 AM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Sep 28, 2011, 05:51:11 AM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Sep 28, 2011, 04:19:47 AM
Quote from: Snowdog on Sep 27, 2011, 09:28:43 PM
I'm afraid the ruined teens nowadays are not satisfied with Dinosaurs anymore. They want bad horror movies with a lot of blood.

and how can Dinosaurs fail to deliver this?
Exactly.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0wP4rP6R70# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0wP4rP6R70#)

Oh god I remember that. :D

It was like "Alien meets Tremors".

Spoiler
Instead of aliens popping out of your chest it was raptor eggs popping out of women's vaginas (and it killed them). Instead of worms killing the western folk it was raptors who grew up at incredible speeds and a T-rex. Dat T-rex vs Bulldozer scene...
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 28, 2011, 12:54:00 PM
The only good thing that came out of Carnosaur was that the T.Rex was re-used in the flick Dinosaur Island. Dat Griffin Drew...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Crazy Rich on Sep 28, 2011, 04:57:46 PM
I saw it as a "fun" movie. The reason it wasn't so great is most likely because it was rushed to beat Jurassic Park to the big screen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MudButt on Sep 28, 2011, 05:33:44 PM
Those special effects..
Avatar ain't shit!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 28, 2011, 06:02:35 PM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Sep 28, 2011, 04:57:46 PM
I saw it as a "fun" movie. The reason it wasn't so great is most likely because it was rushed to beat Jurassic Park to the big screen.

Pretty sure Carnosaur was released after JP to ride on its coattails.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Crazy Rich on Sep 28, 2011, 06:04:24 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 28, 2011, 06:02:35 PM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Sep 28, 2011, 04:57:46 PM
I saw it as a "fun" movie. The reason it wasn't so great is most likely because it was rushed to beat Jurassic Park to the big screen.

Pretty Carnosaur was released after JP to ride on its coattails.
Well, I didn't say they succeeded.  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 28, 2011, 06:12:58 PM
It succeeding in getting me to finish, I'll give it that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on Sep 28, 2011, 08:01:46 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 28, 2011, 06:02:35 PM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Sep 28, 2011, 04:57:46 PM
I saw it as a "fun" movie. The reason it wasn't so great is most likely because it was rushed to beat Jurassic Park to the big screen.

Pretty sure Carnosaur was released after JP to ride on its coattails.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0106521/ (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0106521/)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0107290/ (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0107290/)

Carnosaur was actually released a month before JP.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 28, 2011, 09:20:19 PM
Could still say the same thing. It wants to feed off of JP's success.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Sep 28, 2011, 11:48:56 PM
Roger Corman was Asylum before there was Asylum.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TheMonolith on Sep 29, 2011, 12:06:53 AM
But Corman did some good stuff, like those Poe movies with Vincent Price.
Sure they followed the books for shit but they were still very nice.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Purebreedalien on Sep 29, 2011, 05:30:40 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQrRg3LtjXY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQrRg3LtjXY#ws)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Sep 29, 2011, 05:35:19 PM
I've always wondered why the f**k Tim didn't help them with that shotgun. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Sep 29, 2011, 05:37:55 PM
Quote from: Purebreedalien on Sep 29, 2011, 05:30:40 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQrRg3LtjXY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQrRg3LtjXY#ws)

+ 1 for lapidus  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Crazy Rich on Sep 29, 2011, 05:42:19 PM
"You guys have a gun and you haven't used it yet?"

:D

Spoiler
LOLZ
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Sep 29, 2011, 05:43:22 PM
I lol'd hard at Lapidus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Sep 29, 2011, 06:34:39 PM
Quote from: Laufey on Sep 29, 2011, 05:35:19 PM
I've always wondered why the f**k Tim didn't help them with that shotgun. :laugh:

Yeah, same here. :D

Also, the video was amazing!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Vecrotus on Sep 29, 2011, 06:36:22 PM
I liked the Ray Arnold part.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 29, 2011, 07:27:41 PM
Quote from: Laufey on Sep 29, 2011, 05:35:19 PM
I've always wondered why the f**k Tim didn't help them with that shotgun. :laugh:

Same. Moments like that in a movie drive me insane.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Sep 29, 2011, 07:40:42 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 29, 2011, 07:27:41 PM
Quote from: Laufey on Sep 29, 2011, 05:35:19 PM
I've always wondered why the f**k Tim didn't help them with that shotgun. :laugh:

Same. Moments like that in a movie drive me insane.

Agreed completely. They could have at least had a door between them or something, so that Tim wouldn't see what was happening, and thus wouldn't have any reason to go get he gun.

George Lucas, where are you, Your buddy Spielberg needs some help editing his old movie :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Sep 29, 2011, 09:07:23 PM
they will add bright rainbow feathers on all raptors and redub the dialog so they say utahraptor instead of velociraptor.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Crazy Rich on Sep 29, 2011, 09:48:35 PM
I think it's far too late to add in realism.

Got to give them credit though, the world always knew that T-rex dragged it's tail on the ground until it was proven in the early 90's that T-rex didn't drag it's tail on the ground, just as the top minds are making this discovery the people doing Jurassic Park are picking up on this. Imagine if Speilberg just said, "Aw, f**k it, lets let T-rex drag his tail on the ground and stand up straight".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on Sep 29, 2011, 11:11:43 PM
At the time of the movie Dienonychus was a supspecies of Velociraptor In real life.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 30, 2011, 01:48:56 AM
Thank heaven palaeontologists saw the error in their ways.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Sep 30, 2011, 05:13:05 PM
Quote from: Purebreedalien on Sep 29, 2011, 05:30:40 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQrRg3LtjXY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQrRg3LtjXY#ws)

lmao
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Vecrotus on Oct 01, 2011, 11:33:37 AM
I quite liked the design of the raptors in Jurassic Park 3. I just hope that they address the issue as to why these raptors looked different from the ones in the first two films in a future film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Oct 01, 2011, 11:38:08 AM
Quote from: Vecrotus on Oct 01, 2011, 11:33:37 AM
I quite liked the design of the raptors in Jurassic Park 3. I just hope that they address the issue as to why these raptors looked different from the ones in the first two films in a future film.

I also liked the design of the jp3 raptors but i hated it that they used it in grants daydream. also the lost world raptors will always be the best for me  ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Fujimaster on Oct 01, 2011, 01:10:31 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on Oct 01, 2011, 11:38:08 AM
Quote from: Vecrotus on Oct 01, 2011, 11:33:37 AM
I quite liked the design of the raptors in Jurassic Park 3. I just hope that they address the issue as to why these raptors looked different from the ones in the first two films in a future film.

I also liked the design of the jp3 raptors but i hated it that they used it in grants daydream. also the lost world raptors will always be the best for me  ::)

Hollywood Baby!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Vecrotus on Oct 01, 2011, 01:48:12 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on Oct 01, 2011, 11:38:08 AM
Quote from: Vecrotus on Oct 01, 2011, 11:33:37 AM
I quite liked the design of the raptors in Jurassic Park 3. I just hope that they address the issue as to why these raptors looked different from the ones in the first two films in a future film.

I also liked the design of the jp3 raptors but i hated it that they used it in grants daydream. also the lost world raptors will always be the best for me  ::)

I agree. It made no sense for him to imagine a raptor looking like that as he had never seen one prior to his dream.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 01, 2011, 02:55:12 PM
Hopefully Terra Nova and Planet Dinosaur will re-ignite serious interest in a fourth JP movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Oct 01, 2011, 04:03:51 PM
Changing the raptors appearance in JPIII so they looked closer to what new evidence suggested they looked like, pissed me off. Why? Because trying to make them as accurate as possible is a complete joke anyway seeing as they arent even Velociraptors. Christ whats next in JPIV. Actual turkey sized, feathery Raptors. f**k realism, its a damn sci-FI (emphasis on the fiction) action blockbuster.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 01, 2011, 04:22:46 PM
This is a little bit different though than your average run-of-the-mill sci-fi film. This using animals that actually existed once and not just creations from someone's imagination.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Crazy Rich on Oct 01, 2011, 04:29:42 PM
Yea but they are geneticly engineered, meaning alternations are quite possible. I doubt all or most of the dinosaurs featured could change sex in reality. Especially because they had more in common with repitles and birds than amphibians.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Oct 01, 2011, 06:12:12 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 01, 2011, 04:22:46 PM
This is a little bit different though than your average run-of-the-mill sci-fi film. This using animals that actually existed once and not just creations from someone's imagination.

Granted but this is what the film's version of a Velociraptor looked like back in JP.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thelmagazine.com%2Fimager%2Fsummerscreen-this-week-jurassic-park%2Fb%2Foriginal%2F2169053%2Fb52b%2Fjurassic_kitchen_raptor.jpg&hash=51dfc4d32c0382836737a39044bfbe2541a49f7a)

And this is what a Raptor would have looked more like in reality and it would only have been the size of a large turkey.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dinosaursinart.com%2Fvelociraptor%2FIMAG0009.JPG&hash=60e807c59c811c27f40aab0d71eed002ac035409)

So my point is, we know that Raptors arent anything like the ones in the film, so why then try and change them to make them appear more like they were when they are clearly still miles away from what they actually are. Theyre not even Raptors, theyre more like Deinonychus in the films. Did we careas kids? Did we f**k, do we care now that were older and know Raptors are nothing like the ones in the films? Do we f**k? So why change them?




(//)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 01, 2011, 09:28:53 PM
Spielberg wanted people to say they saw real Dinosaurs - but I always thought he intended that in a behaviour context, because he really didn't care if his Dilophosaurus had a quite noticeable, Clamydosaurus-esque frill.
That and both the novel and film versions of the Dinosaurs' DNAs have been tampered with foreign genetic material. That fact alone would just tell you that they aren't exactly gonna be 100% like their real counterparts, actual knowledge of facts or not.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sabres21768 on Oct 02, 2011, 02:21:24 AM
Quote from: Keg on Oct 01, 2011, 06:12:12 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 01, 2011, 04:22:46 PM
This is a little bit different though than your average run-of-the-mill sci-fi film. This using animals that actually existed once and not just creations from someone's imagination.

Granted but this is what the film's version of a Velociraptor looked like back in JP.

http://www.thelmagazine.com/imager/summerscreen-this-week-jurassic-park/b/original/2169053/b52b/jurassic_kitchen_raptor.jpg

And this is what a Raptor would have looked more like in reality and it would only have been the size of a large turkey.

http://www.dinosaursinart.com/velociraptor/IMAG0009.JPG

So my point is, we know that Raptors arent anything like the ones in the film, so why then try and change them to make them appear more like they were when they are clearly still miles away from what they actually are. Theyre not even Raptors, theyre more like Deinonychus in the films. Did we careas kids? Did we f**k, do we care now that were older and know Raptors are nothing like the ones in the films? Do we f**k? So why change them?






http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utahraptor (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utahraptor)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 02, 2011, 06:33:23 AM
Just watch them.  They're hilarious

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p67tiUcP0g8#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p67tiUcP0g8#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QCnyDFqKtA#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QCnyDFqKtA#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 02, 2011, 04:12:11 PM
This is brilliant!

http://www.collegehumor.com/video/6617410/jurassic-park-characters-awful-realization (http://www.collegehumor.com/video/6617410/jurassic-park-characters-awful-realization)

And btw in regards to all the confusion of the animals in JPark read this article it explains everything.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_issues_in_Jurassic_Park (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_issues_in_Jurassic_Park)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Oct 02, 2011, 04:21:19 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 02, 2011, 04:12:11 PM
This is brilliant!

http://www.collegehumor.com/video/6617410/jurassic-park-characters-awful-realization (http://www.collegehumor.com/video/6617410/jurassic-park-characters-awful-realization)

:laugh:

Spoiler
Loved that they got the original actor as well.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 02, 2011, 04:23:51 PM
Is that the guy that actually played the lawyer in the movie?

EDIT*

Nevermind, just read First Blood's spoiler.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 02, 2011, 04:51:36 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Oct 02, 2011, 04:21:19 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 02, 2011, 04:12:11 PM
This is brilliant!

http://www.collegehumor.com/video/6617410/jurassic-park-characters-awful-realization (http://www.collegehumor.com/video/6617410/jurassic-park-characters-awful-realization)

:laugh:

Spoiler
Loved that they got the original actor as well.
[close]

For once I actually felt sorry for a lawyer :D :D :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Oct 02, 2011, 07:10:16 PM
Would anyone happen to know where I can find a full version of this scene online? I'm going to use it for a presentation on Wednesday, and I only have JP on VHS (i know, I know...), so I can't bring in a DVD to show it to the class. Youtube or something like that is the only real option.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkWeMvrNiOM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkWeMvrNiOM#ws)

If not, then I'll pick up the DVD. Its cheap, but I was planning on holding out for the Blu Ray. Thanks in advance guys :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Oct 08, 2011, 07:40:02 AM
I don't know if anyone already post this but Laura Dern talks a bit about JP4.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/debbiedowner/news/?a=47737 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/debbiedowner/news/?a=47737)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 08, 2011, 03:39:26 PM
It's encouraging news I suppose. At least Steve is still thinking about it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Oct 08, 2011, 03:47:07 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 08, 2011, 03:39:26 PM
It's encouraging news I suppose. At least Steve is still thinking about it.

Well, the script is supposedly being written as we speak.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on Oct 09, 2011, 08:01:06 AM
Dunno if it's the first, but I just stumbled across this review of the Blu-rays.

http://hcc.techradar.com/playback/blu-ray/world-exclusive-review-jurassic-park-ultimate-trilogy-blu-ray-05-10-11 (http://hcc.techradar.com/playback/blu-ray/world-exclusive-review-jurassic-park-ultimate-trilogy-blu-ray-05-10-11)

Gotta say, even though the set promises to look and sound bitchin', I'm disappointed by the apparent lack of fresh extras aside from the documentary. This seemed like a great opportunity for Universal to roll out a few more deleted scenes from the vault... but I guess they weren't feeling it. :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Oct 09, 2011, 08:16:18 AM
Or maybe there weren't any more deleted scenes?
Who knows
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on Oct 09, 2011, 09:32:38 AM
Quote from: Cap. Fitzgerald on Oct 09, 2011, 08:16:18 AM
Or maybe there weren't any more deleted scenes?

The screenplays, numerous production stills, behind the scenes footage, and trailers would seem to indicate otherwise.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Oct 09, 2011, 09:47:16 AM
I'm just taking a guess as to why they wouldn't put them in.
Nice new av/sig set by the way
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Oct 09, 2011, 04:20:34 PM
Good to hear Universal held off on the DNR. They're a very hit and miss studio for Blus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Oct 09, 2011, 04:40:33 PM
Quote from: Bad Replicant on Oct 09, 2011, 09:32:38 AM
Quote from: Cap. Fitzgerald on Oct 09, 2011, 08:16:18 AM
Or maybe there weren't any more deleted scenes?

The screenplays, numerous production stills, behind the scenes footage, and trailers would seem to indicate otherwise.

Lets hope so.

And let me take this opportunity to congratulate you on your new sig/avatar set. Best minimalistic set I've ever seen anywhere, ever.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 10, 2011, 12:07:10 AM
Digital Copy...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.themusicninja.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F03%2FDuck-Sauce-Charlie-Sheen-Spinstyles-Bi-Winning-Edit.jpg&hash=3c05b7bef41fcf3999c789d41950b68092e362fc)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Oct 10, 2011, 12:09:25 AM
Quote from: Bad Replicant on Oct 09, 2011, 09:32:38 AM
Quote from: Cap. Fitzgerald on Oct 09, 2011, 08:16:18 AM
Or maybe there weren't any more deleted scenes?

The screenplays, numerous production stills, behind the scenes footage, and trailers would seem to indicate otherwise.

You know how studios are now these days. They will release a ultimate edition when a new sequel comes out. I would not be surprise if they do that when Jurassic Park 4 ever comes out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 10, 2011, 12:10:55 AM
When was the last time that happened? Fox didn't do it for X-Men when they released X-Men First Class and I'm pretty sure the Predator Hunter Edition was released well before Predators came out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on Oct 10, 2011, 12:26:37 AM
Quote from: Cap. Fitzgerald on Oct 09, 2011, 09:47:16 AM
Nice new av/sig set by the way
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Oct 09, 2011, 04:40:33 PM
And let me take this opportunity to congratulate you on your new sig/avatar set. Best minimalistic set I've ever seen anywhere, ever.
Buh! Er... I mean thanks, fellas.

Spoiler

Just some of the aforementioned pictures floatin' around on the web...

Extra dig site stuff.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp%2Fmjp7.jpg&hash=36af94ecb8f754c154345a1f25be6d68bc181ddb)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjurassicpark%2Fjpcut%2Fextdig1lg.jpg&hash=6d8b7d08ce3fa3c391392b1fab03f946fc8324cf)

Hammond and co discuss the kids being at the park.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjurassicpark%2Fjpcut%2Fendorse.jpg&hash=7efb6e0414f48b20954f07f573ab114de4f638f4)

Extended Triceratops scene (high five?)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjurassicpark%2Fjpcut%2Ftrikecutlg.jpg&hash=440bdfee9f3c62fad0fc3d23f90ccc97aeaa0d1e)

More trouble with them pesky raptors!
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp%2Fmjp15.jpg&hash=74d4feb7e7f1dccf2effd83ff1f2f794b6d0c654)

Prepping equipment on Isla Sorna.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjurassicpark2%2Flwcut%2Forganize1lg.jpg&hash=859c684ec088d00862e61aa8dba0e7b54ebb4af7)

Little something extra from the Stegosaurus scene.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjurassicpark2%2Flwcut%2Fstegorunlg.jpg&hash=5e53e5d12a2a2a955f9d59ef30db10c73c098b47)

Ludlow, drunk as a skunk, trips on poor baby rex's leg.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjurassicpark2%2Flwcut%2Fludlowrexlg.jpg&hash=a9eee9f432a9f40fee30e9657efb15ad4e3ba3c7)

Honestly, I forget what this one is. But it ain't in the movie.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjurassicpark2%2Flwcut%2Ffuturelg.jpg&hash=b11eccd0f309359e8bc660b576cfabe5ee022f08)

Raptor in the field with a bloody mouf. There's more pictures of this, but I can't find them at the moment.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi12.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa210%2FCristovalice%2FLost-3.jpg&hash=5f60d69ffb9f5200a811ced377621fe9cc7a836d)

Michael Jeter and a stick vs. dinosaurs
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjurassicpark3%2Fjp3cut%2Ffightbacklg.jpg&hash=5b24f8343a13bb21b12d6e00edb9fa7d4fd59fda)

Paul and Amanda kiss! Yay!
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjurassicpark3%2Fjp3cut%2Ffamilylg.jpg&hash=0840ec071e62e1d7b3b11408828bb69080c6222f)

Plus other stuff I can't find right now.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Oct 10, 2011, 12:38:08 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 10, 2011, 12:10:55 AM
When was the last time that happened? Fox didn't do it for X-Men when they released X-Men First Class and I'm pretty sure the Predator Hunter Edition was released well before Predators came out.

They did with Rambo and Batman Begins though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 10, 2011, 12:39:26 AM
Quote from: Bad Replicant on Oct 10, 2011, 12:26:37 AM
Quote from: Cap. Fitzgerald on Oct 09, 2011, 09:47:16 AM
Nice new av/sig set by the way
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Oct 09, 2011, 04:40:33 PM
And let me take this opportunity to congratulate you on your new sig/avatar set. Best minimalistic set I've ever seen anywhere, ever.
Buh! Er... I mean thanks, fellas.

Spoiler

Just some of the aforementioned pictures floatin' around on the web...

Extra dig site stuff.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp%2Fmjp7.jpg&hash=36af94ecb8f754c154345a1f25be6d68bc181ddb)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjurassicpark%2Fjpcut%2Fextdig1lg.jpg&hash=6d8b7d08ce3fa3c391392b1fab03f946fc8324cf)

Hammond and co discuss the kids being at the park.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjurassicpark%2Fjpcut%2Fendorse.jpg&hash=7efb6e0414f48b20954f07f573ab114de4f638f4)

Extended Triceratops scene (high five?)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjurassicpark%2Fjpcut%2Ftrikecutlg.jpg&hash=440bdfee9f3c62fad0fc3d23f90ccc97aeaa0d1e)

More trouble with them pesky raptors!
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp%2Fmjp15.jpg&hash=74d4feb7e7f1dccf2effd83ff1f2f794b6d0c654)

Prepping equipment on Isla Sorna.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjurassicpark2%2Flwcut%2Forganize1lg.jpg&hash=859c684ec088d00862e61aa8dba0e7b54ebb4af7)

Little something extra from the Stegosaurus scene.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjurassicpark2%2Flwcut%2Fstegorunlg.jpg&hash=5e53e5d12a2a2a955f9d59ef30db10c73c098b47)

Ludlow, drunk as a skunk, trips on poor baby rex's leg.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjurassicpark2%2Flwcut%2Fludlowrexlg.jpg&hash=a9eee9f432a9f40fee30e9657efb15ad4e3ba3c7)

Honestly, I forget what this one is. But it ain't in the movie.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjurassicpark2%2Flwcut%2Ffuturelg.jpg&hash=b11eccd0f309359e8bc660b576cfabe5ee022f08)

Raptor in the field with a bloody mouf. There's more pictures of this, but I can't find them at the moment.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi12.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa210%2FCristovalice%2FLost-3.jpg&hash=5f60d69ffb9f5200a811ced377621fe9cc7a836d)

Michael Jeter and a stick vs. dinosaurs
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjurassicpark3%2Fjp3cut%2Ffightbacklg.jpg&hash=5b24f8343a13bb21b12d6e00edb9fa7d4fd59fda)

Paul and Amanda kiss! Yay!
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjurassicpark3%2Fjp3cut%2Ffamilylg.jpg&hash=0840ec071e62e1d7b3b11408828bb69080c6222f)

Plus other stuff I can't find right now.
[close]


The talking about kids and Mike Jeter with the stick look nice, everything else looks meh.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on Oct 10, 2011, 01:51:57 AM
My lame "descriptions" don't really do them any justice. For the most part they're small bits that add a little more depth to the characters. I'd still love to see them at some point. You can read about them in better detail at jplegacy.org, though they don't have all the known stuff listed.

BTW, you can actually see them filming part of the dialogue about the kids in this video at 4:29. There's another line from Hammond right before it that didn't make the final cut either.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0xRlfbJG4k# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0xRlfbJG4k#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Oct 10, 2011, 09:29:02 PM
Some nice pictures from the first movie, would have been nice to see some of thos deleted scenes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on Oct 11, 2011, 01:41:44 AM
JPLEGACY = AVPGALAXY

Those who are there will know exactly what I mean
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Hive Tyrant on Oct 11, 2011, 02:50:41 AM
I was an active member at jplegacy for years. Name's Tyranno Infinity. Haven't been active there in ages though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on Oct 11, 2011, 02:20:28 PM
I haven't been active but I'm a member too. Name's Ghost Rider. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 12, 2011, 01:21:48 PM
I've been a member for a while now but I hardly go into the forums because I feel it's a bit to messy looking. Needs to have a clean remodel like AVPGalaxy say : )
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Oct 12, 2011, 07:20:56 PM
Quote from: Keg on Oct 01, 2011, 04:03:51 PM
Changing the raptors appearance in JPIII so they looked closer to what new evidence suggested they looked like, pissed me off. Why? Because trying to make them as accurate as possible is a complete joke anyway seeing as they arent even Velociraptors. Christ whats next in JPIV. Actual turkey sized, feathery Raptors. f**k realism, its a damn sci-FI (emphasis on the fiction) action blockbuster.

The subtext in jp3 is that the feathered ones are male, the female raptor that takes the eggs looks like the original ones,
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Oct 12, 2011, 11:03:28 PM
Bluray.com's in-depth review.

http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Jurassic-Park-Ultimate-Trilogy-Blu-ray/24947/#Review (http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Jurassic-Park-Ultimate-Trilogy-Blu-ray/24947/#Review)

Looking good.  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 12, 2011, 11:17:34 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Oct 12, 2011, 11:03:28 PM
Bluray.com's in-depth review.

http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Jurassic-Park-Ultimate-Trilogy-Blu-ray/24947/#Review (http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Jurassic-Park-Ultimate-Trilogy-Blu-ray/24947/#Review)

Looking good.  :)

I can't wait to watch the new documentary : )
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Oct 12, 2011, 11:25:04 PM
Bleh, edge enhancement. Ah well, hurry up with the individual releases so I don't have to bother with the sequels.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ace3g on Oct 19, 2011, 09:05:19 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUQ0qJJpFZM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUQ0qJJpFZM#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-LjutfwpkSE#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-LjutfwpkSE#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CbmwF0myvk#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CbmwF0myvk#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLhXebP1cek#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLhXebP1cek#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u04KX866nws#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u04KX866nws#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6OxKvdh0lc#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6OxKvdh0lc#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PU9za-VxIVY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PU9za-VxIVY#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1vddYjfOyQ#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1vddYjfOyQ#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYmmBqF5yhE#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYmmBqF5yhE#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vquK7rYmNS4#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vquK7rYmNS4#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jr32P5xjFLk#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jr32P5xjFLk#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 20, 2011, 03:01:58 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Oct 19, 2011, 09:05:19 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUQ0qJJpFZM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUQ0qJJpFZM#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-LjutfwpkSE#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-LjutfwpkSE#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CbmwF0myvk#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CbmwF0myvk#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLhXebP1cek#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLhXebP1cek#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u04KX866nws#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u04KX866nws#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6OxKvdh0lc#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6OxKvdh0lc#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PU9za-VxIVY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PU9za-VxIVY#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1vddYjfOyQ#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1vddYjfOyQ#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYmmBqF5yhE#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYmmBqF5yhE#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vquK7rYmNS4#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vquK7rYmNS4#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jr32P5xjFLk#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jr32P5xjFLk#ws)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ftwilightswarden.files.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F03%2F1-10-doctor-crazy-happy.jpg&hash=9267bd1001857191dce9a09a6d99aa3d6e937222)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ace3g on Oct 20, 2011, 04:10:28 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-pUPbxy6RUk#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-pUPbxy6RUk#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0b57fCGU3g#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0b57fCGU3g#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 20, 2011, 04:32:19 PM
ARRRRRRRRRRRG I WANT THAT CAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 20, 2011, 04:53:51 PM
I always thought that was sour cream.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Oct 20, 2011, 04:57:49 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Oct 20, 2011, 04:53:51 PM
I always thought that was sour cream.

When i was little and i almost watched this movie like multiple times a week i thought the same :P  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 20, 2011, 05:14:11 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Oct 20, 2011, 04:53:51 PM
I always thought that was sour cream.

It quite clearly is a shaving cream can.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 21, 2011, 01:21:47 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 20, 2011, 05:14:11 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Oct 20, 2011, 04:53:51 PM
I always thought that was sour cream.

It quite clearly is a shaving cream can.

Hehe, I can see that now that I'm older.  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Oct 21, 2011, 03:02:29 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 12, 2011, 01:21:48 PM
I've been a member for a while now but I hardly go into the forums because I feel it's a bit to messy looking. Needs to have a clean remodel like AVPGalaxy say : )

Could be that there has not been a whole lot to talk about since we had not had a Jurassic Park movie in 10 years. On AVPGalaxy, we get more games, books and at least a movie once a every few years (AVP in 2004, AVPR in 2007, Predators in 2010 and Prometheus in 2012).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Highland on Oct 21, 2011, 04:36:26 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 20, 2011, 05:14:11 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Oct 20, 2011, 04:53:51 PM
I always thought that was sour cream.

It quite clearly is a shaving cream can.

I remember the scene when it get's covered in mud, the camera hangs on it for just longer than is comfortable. When I was young, I thought for sure that it was going to get found and that's how the sequel would come about.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Le Celticant on Oct 21, 2011, 12:02:51 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Oct 21, 2011, 03:02:29 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 12, 2011, 01:21:48 PM
I've been a member for a while now but I hardly go into the forums because I feel it's a bit to messy looking. Needs to have a clean remodel like AVPGalaxy say : )

Could be that there has not been a whole lot to talk about since we had not had a Jurassic Park movie in 10 years. On AVPGalaxy, we get more games, books and at least a movie once a every few years (AVP in 2004, AVPR in 2007, Predators in 2010 and Prometheus in 2012).

It's not like there were a lot to talk about both AVP & Predators movie either.
I don't even wanna talk about the game  ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 24, 2011, 04:29:27 PM
Thats right folks I'm now the rightful owner of this glorious boxset ;D

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi56.tinypic.com%2F1jvlz6.jpg&hash=a76c8dfd5c755b20d9e9152c4a2da34def3da4a9)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Oct 24, 2011, 04:39:10 PM
sweet mother of god
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 24, 2011, 05:16:29 PM
That's really great man, the set's looking fabulous. Want it so bad.
If it doesn't bother you, could you get more pictures of the T.Rex diorama?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 24, 2011, 06:40:14 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 24, 2011, 04:29:27 PM
Thats right folks I'm now the rightful owner of this glorious boxset ;D

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi56.tinypic.com%2F1jvlz6.jpg&hash=a76c8dfd5c755b20d9e9152c4a2da34def3da4a9)

Hmph. Bask in your singular glory, I'll be joining you soon!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on Oct 24, 2011, 07:54:23 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 24, 2011, 04:29:27 PM
Thats right folks I'm now the rightful owner of this glorious boxset ;D

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi56.tinypic.com%2F1jvlz6.jpg&hash=a76c8dfd5c755b20d9e9152c4a2da34def3da4a9)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hP5KzBJ42r4# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hP5KzBJ42r4#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Oct 24, 2011, 08:09:39 PM
Going for the regular version. as much as i hate to say it the t-rex statue looks like it came from a happy meal.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on Oct 24, 2011, 10:17:51 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 24, 2011, 04:29:27 PM
Thats right folks I'm now the rightful owner of this glorious boxset ;D

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi56.tinypic.com%2F1jvlz6.jpg&hash=a76c8dfd5c755b20d9e9152c4a2da34def3da4a9)

Get rid of that Spino and then it'll be glorious.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Oct 24, 2011, 10:19:54 PM
Quote from: Ghost Rider on Oct 24, 2011, 10:17:51 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 24, 2011, 04:29:27 PM
Thats right folks I'm now the rightful owner of this glorious boxset ;D

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi56.tinypic.com%2F1jvlz6.jpg&hash=a76c8dfd5c755b20d9e9152c4a2da34def3da4a9)

Get rid of that Spino and then it'll be glorious.

I really like the spino but they used a pretty bad production still for it  :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Oct 24, 2011, 10:22:02 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 24, 2011, 04:29:27 PM
Thats right folks I'm now the rightful owner of this glorious boxset ;D

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi56.tinypic.com%2F1jvlz6.jpg&hash=a76c8dfd5c755b20d9e9152c4a2da34def3da4a9)

Can you tell us what the "exclusive" special features of this Blu-Ray set are?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 24, 2011, 11:20:53 PM
Quote from: predxeno on Oct 24, 2011, 10:22:02 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 24, 2011, 04:29:27 PM
Thats right folks I'm now the rightful owner of this glorious boxset ;D

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi56.tinypic.com%2F1jvlz6.jpg&hash=a76c8dfd5c755b20d9e9152c4a2da34def3da4a9)

Can you tell us what the "exclusive" special features of this Blu-Ray set are?

Its all the same as the DVD extras but there is an amazing 6 part documentary with loads of new footage and awesome interviews with the cast and crew. Lots of juicy facts  :P Oh and Goldblum is hilarious!

Quote from: Snowdog on Oct 24, 2011, 08:09:39 PM
Going for the regular version. as much as i hate to say it the t-rex statue looks like it came from a happy meal.

You would change your mind if you held it in your hands.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Oct 24, 2011, 11:22:34 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 24, 2011, 11:20:53 PM
Quote from: predxeno on Oct 24, 2011, 10:22:02 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 24, 2011, 04:29:27 PM
Thats right folks I'm now the rightful owner of this glorious boxset ;D

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi56.tinypic.com%2F1jvlz6.jpg&hash=a76c8dfd5c755b20d9e9152c4a2da34def3da4a9)

Can you tell us what the "exclusive" special features of this Blu-Ray set are?

Its all the same as the DVD extras but there is an amazing 6 part documentary with loads of new footage and awesome interviews with the cast and crew. Lots of juice facts  :P

Quote from: Snowdog on Oct 24, 2011, 08:09:39 PM
Going for the regular version. as much as i hate to say it the t-rex statue looks like it came from a happy meal.

You would change your mind if you held it in your hands.

can you post some more detailed pics for me then ? :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Oct 24, 2011, 11:23:11 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 24, 2011, 11:20:53 PM
Quote from: predxeno on Oct 24, 2011, 10:22:02 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 24, 2011, 04:29:27 PM
Thats right folks I'm now the rightful owner of this glorious boxset ;D

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi56.tinypic.com%2F1jvlz6.jpg&hash=a76c8dfd5c755b20d9e9152c4a2da34def3da4a9)

Can you tell us what the "exclusive" special features of this Blu-Ray set are?

Its all the same as the DVD extras but there is an amazing 6 part documentary with loads of new footage and awesome interviews with the cast and crew. Lots of juicy facts  :P Oh and Goldblum is hilarious!

Can you be more specific?  What are these facts about?  Is the documentary the only exclusive feature?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 24, 2011, 11:43:15 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on Oct 24, 2011, 11:22:34 PM
can you post some more detailed pics for me then ? :)

Will do tomorrow at some point I'm now off to bed  8)

Quote from: predxeno on Oct 24, 2011, 11:23:11 PM
Can you be more specific?  What are these facts about?  Is the documentary the only exclusive feature?

The documentary comes with any blu-ray set and here is a clip to show you what I mean...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0b57fCGU3g#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0b57fCGU3g#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Oct 25, 2011, 12:36:06 AM
Some forum member named Giu3232 who met Steven Spielberg this week, we now have confirmation that Jurassic Park IV will have animatronics dinosaurs!

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/index.php (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/index.php)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on Oct 25, 2011, 12:44:51 AM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Oct 25, 2011, 12:36:06 AM
Some forum member named Giu3232 who met Steven Spielberg this week(!) we now have confirmation that Jurassic Park IV will have animatronics dinosaurs!

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/index.php (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/index.php)

If this is true, then f**k yeah.

If it's not...then I will be a very angry little boy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Oct 25, 2011, 12:47:59 AM
I hope it's true. Animatronics have been dead in the past recent years.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 25, 2011, 05:11:34 AM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Oct 25, 2011, 12:36:06 AM
Some forum member named Giu3232 who met Steven Spielberg this week, we now have confirmation that Jurassic Park IV will have animatronics dinosaurs!

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/index.php (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/index.php)

Good. We can go back to dinosaurs that actually look real ant entirely CGI products.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Mike’s Monsters on Oct 25, 2011, 05:18:08 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Oct 24, 2011, 11:23:11 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 24, 2011, 11:20:53 PM
Quote from: predxeno on Oct 24, 2011, 10:22:02 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 24, 2011, 04:29:27 PM
Thats right folks I'm now the rightful owner of this glorious boxset ;D

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi56.tinypic.com%2F1jvlz6.jpg&hash=a76c8dfd5c755b20d9e9152c4a2da34def3da4a9)

Can you tell us what the "exclusive" special features of this Blu-Ray set are?

Its all the same as the DVD extras but there is an amazing 6 part documentary with loads of new footage and awesome interviews with the cast and crew. Lots of juicy facts  :P Oh and Goldblum is hilarious!

Can you be more specific?  What are these facts about?  Is the documentary the only exclusive feature?

I'm sorry if this comes off rude, but do you ever try to look things up yourself?

http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Jurassic-Park-Ultimate-Trilogy-Blu-ray/24947/ (http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Jurassic-Park-Ultimate-Trilogy-Blu-ray/24947/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Oct 25, 2011, 05:20:33 AM
He never does, and he never learns that he should
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 25, 2011, 05:24:16 AM
I see myself crying manly tears when I see that Brachiosaurus for the first time in HD...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Oct 25, 2011, 08:42:27 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 25, 2011, 05:24:16 AM
I see myself crying manly tears when I see that Brachiosaurus for the first time in HD...

The t-rex breaking the fence, man. The t-rex breaking the fence.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 25, 2011, 10:42:37 AM
It would be weird if Jurassic Park, a franchise known for mixing CGI and animatronics, would give birth to a film that didn't feature the latters.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Feral_PRED on Oct 25, 2011, 11:06:29 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Oct 25, 2011, 08:42:27 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 25, 2011, 05:24:16 AM
I see myself crying manly tears when I see that Brachiosaurus for the first time in HD...

The t-rex breaking the fence, man. The t-rex breaking the fence.
Muldoon being killed. :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gazz on Oct 25, 2011, 11:21:40 AM
Just so you know there's a little snippet on JPIV in next months Empire (December issue). Nothing much, just Spielberg confirming that Mark Protosevich is indeed well into writing the script and he goes on to state that he hopes it'll be out in the next few years and that he thinks the core story is far better than JPIII.

Nothing earth shattering in the way of news but thought you guys should know.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Oct 25, 2011, 12:31:33 PM
Quote from: Gazz on Oct 25, 2011, 11:21:40 AM
Just so you know there's a little snippet on JPIV in next months Empire (December issue). Nothing much, just Spielberg confirming that Mark Protosevich is indeed well into writing the script and he goes on to state that he hopes it'll be out in the next few years and that he thinks the core story is far better than JPIII.

Nothing earth shattering in the way of news but thought you guys should know.

Nice to see that info being released on paper. It gives the rumors strength.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Oct 25, 2011, 04:21:45 PM
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Jurassic+Park+Ultimate+Trilogy+-+Blu-ray+Disc/3649137.p?skuId=3649137&id=2305702 (http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Jurassic+Park+Ultimate+Trilogy+-+Blu-ray+Disc/3649137.p?skuId=3649137&id=2305702)

Best Buy is doing it again.  There's an exclusive set from this store that contains the Blu-Ray, DVD, and Digital Copy of the entire trilogy in a steelbook case.  I think I'll get this version with the DVDs than spend all the extra bucks on a limited edition with the statue.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg254.imageshack.us%2Fimg254%2F3152%2Fjpfront.jpg&hash=fc1b63c6fcb309b3bdf28da1c61a8bc16b4b51c9) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/254/jpfront.jpg/)

Uploaded with ImageShack.us (http://imageshack.us)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gazz on Oct 25, 2011, 04:31:20 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcache.ohinternet.com%2Fimages%2F4%2F45%2FDat_ass.jpg&hash=5af560df5d591092b25ffcdf0bb40d7748b5d7be)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ace3g on Oct 25, 2011, 04:34:20 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbitcast-a-sm.bitgravity.com%2Fslashfilm%2Fwp%2Fwp-content%2Fimages%2FJURASSIC-PARK-JC-Richard.jpeg&hash=fefed12fc4aa36cf0ad17ab8b945d1fb05544621)

http://www.slashfilm.com/cool-stuff-mondos-jurassic-park-series-continues-jc-richard/ (http://www.slashfilm.com/cool-stuff-mondos-jurassic-park-series-continues-jc-richard/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Oct 25, 2011, 04:37:37 PM
Oh, that is f**king sweet. Much better than the last one. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Oct 25, 2011, 05:36:58 PM
LOL ! just turned out i had like €70,- of coupons over here. So i ordered the special edition of jp with the t.rex statue. only had to pay like €1,75 because of my coupons  ;D ;D freaking nice
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Oct 25, 2011, 05:38:58 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on Oct 25, 2011, 05:36:58 PM
LOL ! just turned out i had like €70,- of coupons over here. So i ordered the special edition of jp with the t.rex statue. only had to pay like €1,75 because of my coupons  ;D ;D freaking nice

Lucky motherf**ker.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 25, 2011, 06:43:59 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Oct 25, 2011, 08:42:27 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 25, 2011, 05:24:16 AM
I see myself crying manly tears when I see that Brachiosaurus for the first time in HD...

The t-rex breaking the fence, man. The t-rex breaking the fence.

Yup, that too. When I saw JP on a 104" projector screen on DVD, both scenes made me well up for different reasons.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 25, 2011, 10:05:27 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on Oct 25, 2011, 05:36:58 PM
LOL ! just turned out i had like €70,- of coupons over here. So i ordered the special edition of jp with the t.rex statue. only had to pay like €1,75 because of my coupons  ;D ;D freaking nice

Shit!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 25, 2011, 10:31:12 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Oct 24, 2011, 05:16:29 PM
could you get more pictures of the T.Rex diorama?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi51.tinypic.com%2F11kyzyr.jpg&hash=3c776660d48de8e5255f2e5cf864107f9cc42652)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi56.tinypic.com%2F2gt7qq8.jpg&hash=ad5bc788cb9d9c719fa0da997138c8bc4daf5af9)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi56.tinypic.com%2F29c5jkn.jpg&hash=79ae8ec8bdeec9db04e73847502acb37850d20d0)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi55.tinypic.com%2Fjkde9j.jpg&hash=af10d07c0ed98b7ecfdcdc72c181caa088530eac)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi54.tinypic.com%2F21ltwmq.jpg&hash=74e5886545fe1893ace873cacea6eee4898dfdb5)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi56.tinypic.com%2F333y62b.jpg&hash=f87c9a07327c81e5c1d0846a84e087d781381839)

There you go  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Oct 25, 2011, 10:44:33 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 25, 2011, 10:31:12 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Oct 24, 2011, 05:16:29 PM
could you get more pictures of the T.Rex diorama?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi51.tinypic.com%2F11kyzyr.jpg&hash=3c776660d48de8e5255f2e5cf864107f9cc42652)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi56.tinypic.com%2F2gt7qq8.jpg&hash=ad5bc788cb9d9c719fa0da997138c8bc4daf5af9)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi56.tinypic.com%2F29c5jkn.jpg&hash=79ae8ec8bdeec9db04e73847502acb37850d20d0)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi55.tinypic.com%2Fjkde9j.jpg&hash=af10d07c0ed98b7ecfdcdc72c181caa088530eac)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi54.tinypic.com%2F21ltwmq.jpg&hash=74e5886545fe1893ace873cacea6eee4898dfdb5)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi56.tinypic.com%2F333y62b.jpg&hash=f87c9a07327c81e5c1d0846a84e087d781381839)

There you go  :)

Thanks ;D Looks oke, just a shame they didn't go with the movie colors of the t. rex. But yeah i ordered this limited edition also so i can see for myself this week  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on Oct 25, 2011, 11:09:46 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Oct 25, 2011, 08:42:27 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 25, 2011, 05:24:16 AM
I see myself crying manly tears when I see that Brachiosaurus for the first time in HD...

The t-rex breaking the fence, man. The t-rex breaking the fence.

Oh gods just the thought...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Oct 26, 2011, 01:15:18 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Oct 25, 2011, 04:34:20 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbitcast-a-sm.bitgravity.com%2Fslashfilm%2Fwp%2Fwp-content%2Fimages%2FJURASSIC-PARK-JC-Richard.jpeg&hash=fefed12fc4aa36cf0ad17ab8b945d1fb05544621)

http://www.slashfilm.com/cool-stuff-mondos-jurassic-park-series-continues-jc-richard/ (http://www.slashfilm.com/cool-stuff-mondos-jurassic-park-series-continues-jc-richard/)

Love it. Nice touch having the shooting star there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 26, 2011, 01:22:33 AM
I like it too though I would have taken out the T.Rex. You can barely see it and it's just a little insert, as if they said "we HAVE to include her somewhere in this image".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 26, 2011, 02:13:23 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 25, 2011, 10:31:12 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Oct 24, 2011, 05:16:29 PM
could you get more pictures of the T.Rex diorama?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi51.tinypic.com%2F11kyzyr.jpg&hash=3c776660d48de8e5255f2e5cf864107f9cc42652)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi56.tinypic.com%2F2gt7qq8.jpg&hash=ad5bc788cb9d9c719fa0da997138c8bc4daf5af9)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi56.tinypic.com%2F29c5jkn.jpg&hash=79ae8ec8bdeec9db04e73847502acb37850d20d0)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi55.tinypic.com%2Fjkde9j.jpg&hash=af10d07c0ed98b7ecfdcdc72c181caa088530eac)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi54.tinypic.com%2F21ltwmq.jpg&hash=74e5886545fe1893ace873cacea6eee4898dfdb5)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi56.tinypic.com%2F333y62b.jpg&hash=f87c9a07327c81e5c1d0846a84e087d781381839)

There you go  :)

Lucky bastard! I'll have to order this.  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 26, 2011, 02:15:27 AM
Mine's supposed to arrive on the 27th. Can't wait!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Oct 26, 2011, 03:35:25 AM
Is Jurassic Park IV really coming out?  If it is, should I wait for a Jurassic Park Quadrilogy instead of buying the Blu-Ray trilogy out right now?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 26, 2011, 03:50:36 AM
There's no confirmation as yet. In which case you'll be waiting a long time for a Quadrilogy. A very long time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Oct 26, 2011, 03:53:26 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 26, 2011, 01:22:33 AM
I like it too though I would have taken out the T.Rex. You can barely see it and it's just a little insert, as if they said "we HAVE to include her somewhere in this image".

Heh. Didn't even notice that until you pointed it out.

Yeah, would've been better without the Jeep scene.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Oct 26, 2011, 06:51:58 AM
Speilbeg says the script is being worked on, so that's something.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Oct 26, 2011, 08:08:58 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 26, 2011, 01:22:33 AM
I like it too though I would have taken out the T.Rex. You can barely see it and it's just a little insert, as if they said "we HAVE to include her somewhere in this image".

This.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Oct 26, 2011, 02:24:09 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Oct 26, 2011, 01:15:18 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Oct 25, 2011, 04:34:20 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbitcast-a-sm.bitgravity.com%2Fslashfilm%2Fwp%2Fwp-content%2Fimages%2FJURASSIC-PARK-JC-Richard.jpeg&hash=fefed12fc4aa36cf0ad17ab8b945d1fb05544621)

http://www.slashfilm.com/cool-stuff-mondos-jurassic-park-series-continues-jc-richard/ (http://www.slashfilm.com/cool-stuff-mondos-jurassic-park-series-continues-jc-richard/)

Love it. Nice touch having the shooting star there.

yeah, very Spielbergian.


Edit:

http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=32315 (http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=32315)

QuoteOn [Spielberg's] dinosaur series, the signs are good. "The screenplay is being written right now by Mark Protosevich. I'm hoping that will come out in the next couple of years. We have a good story. We have a better story for four than we had for three..."
[/quote]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Oct 26, 2011, 06:37:54 PM
I can see this coming out by 2013 or 2014 by now. I think the sales of the Blu-Ray collection will help JP4 get made for once.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 26, 2011, 08:10:43 PM
I think that we'll see a rise in dino-films in the near future considering JP4 is in the works. Pixar might also be making a dinosaur movie aswell, and there's that odd dinosaurs vs aliens film that's also in the pipeline.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 26, 2011, 08:14:10 PM
My Blu-Ray set arrived today ;D ;D ;D downloading the digital copies now!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Oct 26, 2011, 08:14:52 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 26, 2011, 08:10:43 PM
I think that we'll see a rise in dino-films in the near future considering JP4 is in the works. Pixar might also be making a dinosaur movie aswell, and there's that odd dinosaurs vs aliens film that's also in the pipeline.

Would like to see a sequel to Disney's Dinosaur 8) Or maybe a retelling of sir arthur conan doyle's the lost world. Still one of my favorite stories ;D And there is only 1 movie about it i really really liked http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0302739/ (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0302739/) also the tv-show about the lost world was pretty cool.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 26, 2011, 08:19:24 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on Oct 26, 2011, 08:14:52 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 26, 2011, 08:10:43 PM
I think that we'll see a rise in dino-films in the near future considering JP4 is in the works. Pixar might also be making a dinosaur movie aswell, and there's that odd dinosaurs vs aliens film that's also in the pipeline.

Would like to see a sequel to Disney's Dinosaur 8) Or maybe a retelling of sir arthur conan doyle's the lost world. Still one of my favorite stories ;D And there is only 1 movie about it i really really liked http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0302739/ (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0302739/) also the tv-show about the lost world was pretty cool.

The 2001 TV movie of The Lost World is ok but nothing on the 1920's version.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 26, 2011, 08:50:07 PM
The 1925 version is really something special. It doesn't take that much patience to watch it, believe it or not. If you like sci-fi and dinosaurs, you'll love it.

Alien3, did you also receive a voucher to download JP The Game episode 1 for free?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: severen76 on Oct 26, 2011, 09:08:58 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on Oct 26, 2011, 08:14:52 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 26, 2011, 08:10:43 PM
I think that we'll see a rise in dino-films in the near future considering JP4 is in the works. Pixar might also be making a dinosaur movie aswell, and there's that odd dinosaurs vs aliens film that's also in the pipeline.

Would like to see a sequel to Disney's Dinosaur 8) Or maybe a retelling of sir arthur conan doyle's the lost world. Still one of my favorite stories ;D And there is only 1 movie about it i really really liked http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0302739/ (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0302739/) also the tv-show about the lost world was pretty cool.

I loved that version of the lost world. I remember when i first saw it on Christmas day playing with my new Jurassic park 3 toys. Good memories.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 26, 2011, 09:17:08 PM
I liked that Bob Hoskins was in it too. He's one of my favourite actors.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Oct 26, 2011, 09:26:53 PM
Yep, that was a damn decent version of The Lost World. And Bob Hoskins is great in it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenokiller on Oct 26, 2011, 09:53:26 PM
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=83560 (http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=83560)
It's sounding good
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 26, 2011, 10:05:38 PM
"Next couple of years" makes the most sense. I anticipate a release by 2015 at the latest.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Oct 26, 2011, 10:11:02 PM
I'm betting on a late 2013/2014 release.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on Oct 27, 2011, 12:55:04 AM
Damn, this is moving faster than I anticipated. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Oct 27, 2011, 01:22:36 AM
The 20's version of Lost World was great. I remember they made a direct to video of The Lost World back in 1997 or 1998, it was a cheap cash in on the second Jurassic Park movie from what I can remember.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 27, 2011, 04:44:07 PM
2013 would be best for the 20 year anniversary.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 27, 2011, 08:08:04 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 26, 2011, 08:50:07 PM
The 1925 version is really something special. It doesn't take that much patience to watch it, believe it or not. If you like sci-fi and dinosaurs, you'll love it.

Alien3, did you also receive a voucher to download JP The Game episode 1 for free?

I do believe so : )
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenomrph on Oct 27, 2011, 08:34:40 PM
my blu-ray set came in the mail today, woop woop :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 27, 2011, 11:40:05 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 27, 2011, 08:08:04 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 26, 2011, 08:50:07 PM
The 1925 version is really something special. It doesn't take that much patience to watch it, believe it or not. If you like sci-fi and dinosaurs, you'll love it.

Alien3, did you also receive a voucher to download JP The Game episode 1 for free?

I do believe so : )

I didn't even know it was in there :D

I'm really fond of this Rex diorama. While the colour is quite dull, I like that the eyes are facing forward.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: x2SMONEY on Oct 28, 2011, 12:02:07 AM
I can officially say after years of waiting that I don't give a shit about this movie being made anymore...
...just puttin it out there....
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenomrph on Oct 28, 2011, 05:14:31 AM
Cared enough to post about it, apparently. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 28, 2011, 02:08:50 PM
Ooooo snap!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Oct 28, 2011, 02:11:45 PM
Quote from: x2SMONEY on Oct 28, 2011, 12:02:07 AM
I can officially say after years of waiting that I don't give a shit about this movie being made anymore...
...just puttin it out there....

inb4notyourblog
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Xenoborg on Oct 28, 2011, 04:00:11 PM
Quote from: x2SMONEY on Oct 28, 2011, 12:02:07 AM
I can officially say after years of waiting that I don't give a shit about this movie being made anymore...
...just puttin it out there....
You're the 0.00001%.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Oct 28, 2011, 04:04:12 PM
I'm actually not terribly excited either. Don't get me wrong, I don't mind a fourth movie and I'm sure I will watch it once it's made, but at this point there's just so little to be hyped for and at this point of the production the movie always seems to be off in such a distant future that I just can't get excited about it.

Once it gets a release date and maybe get some casting done, then I'll be excited. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Oct 28, 2011, 04:53:50 PM
Hard to believe it been 10 years since Jurassic Park III. By the time when Jurassic Park IV comes out, it will be 12 or 13 years since the 3rd movie!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 28, 2011, 06:09:27 PM
Not seeing the problem.
Breaking the year pattern, sure, but as long as I like it when and if it comes out I'm not complaining.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Oct 28, 2011, 06:10:47 PM
Time does fly by fast since I always thought we would have a 4th movie by now. I hope the movie won't be Indiana Jones 4 of the Jurassic Park series (In other words, a movie that was a big let down after years of waiting).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Oct 28, 2011, 08:40:51 PM
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Jurassic+Park+Ultimate+Trilogy+(3+Disc)+(W/Toy)+-+Blu-ray+Disc/3039137.p?id=2239452&skuId=3039137&st=jurassic park&lp=3&cp=1 (http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Jurassic+Park+Ultimate+Trilogy+(3+Disc)+(W/Toy)+-+Blu-ray+Disc/3039137.p?id=2239452&skuId=3039137&st=jurassic%20park&lp=3&cp=1)

QuoteJurassic Park Ultimate Trilogy (3 Disc) (W/Toy)- Blu-ray Disc

Best Buy is finally selling the limited edition trilogy and I find it hilarious that they call the T-Rex model a "toy".  That sounds exactly like my dad who called my Alien Anthology egg bust just that.  These people have no idea what art is.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Xenoborg on Oct 28, 2011, 08:46:38 PM
Quote from: predxeno on Oct 28, 2011, 08:40:51 PM
These people have no idea what art is.
My father calls Aliens and Predators, cartoons.

The sad part is that he was a fan once.  :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: cloverfan98 on Oct 29, 2011, 02:12:41 AM
I'm really hoping this turns out well. I've heard rumors of a story involving further genetic tampering, but I really hope that doesn't happen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 29, 2011, 05:16:15 AM
They can't do worse than raptor soldiers, guys. And I'm certain that idea has been dropped.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Nov 03, 2011, 03:02:24 PM
Wait... holy shit, that was a real thing? I thought that was a parody!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Nov 03, 2011, 03:04:04 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Nov 03, 2011, 03:02:24 PM
Wait... holy shit, that was a real thing? I thought that was a parody!

Sadly, it wasn't a joke.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Nov 03, 2011, 03:51:34 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Nov 03, 2011, 03:04:04 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Nov 03, 2011, 03:02:24 PM
Wait... holy shit, that was a real thing? I thought that was a parody!

Sadly, it wasn't a joke.

Jurassic Park meets Hurt Locker. Or Saving Private Compy.

I remember the original inspiration for that idea was these real life military trained dolphins that swim into enemy waters with spy tech and torpedoes and shit strapped to them. I can see Spielberg hearing that and going a little over board with what Raptors are capable of. 

That being said ... I wouldn't mind seeing an epic 'Dinosaurs reclaiming the earth' film that has loose ties to Jurassic Park. Wouldn't call it Jurassic Park. I would have reserved the title "The Lost World" for it ... and just used JP2 for the sequel taking place on site B.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 03, 2011, 04:19:29 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Nov 03, 2011, 03:02:24 PM
Wait... holy shit, that was a real thing? I thought that was a parody!

Dinosaurs reclaiming the earth is dumb. How would dinosaurs compete? At least with Planet of the Apes, humans had an adversary that could put up a fight.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MudButt on Nov 03, 2011, 04:54:30 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 03, 2011, 04:19:29 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Nov 03, 2011, 03:02:24 PM
Wait... holy shit, that was a real thing? I thought that was a parody!

Dinosaurs reclaiming the earth is dumb. How would dinosaurs compete? At least with Planet of the Apes, humans had an adversary that could put up a fight.

Just put it on mainland, Rex in San Diego was great in the The Lost World, I want more scenes like that. I have a pretty bad idea in my head about how they would get there, rival companies hire mercenaries to smuggle dinos to the mainland, shit obviously goes wrong, they get loose, BAM JP4.

Then an intense sequence of a SWAT or Special Forces team trying to rescue people, or contain a dino and they are one by one taken out by some raptors. Ooooohhhh.  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 03, 2011, 05:08:30 PM
Oh that's different then. I thought meant something like PotA where dinosaurs actually fight back. Your idea isn't bad but I think it would work better as fan fiction. I doubt movie goers would go for it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MudButt on Nov 03, 2011, 05:12:17 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 03, 2011, 05:08:30 PM
Oh that's different then. I thought meant something like PotA where dinosaurs actually fight back. Your idea isn't bad but I think it would work better as fan fiction. I doubt movie goers would go for it.

Dinosaurs fighting back.. PISH POSH. That would be stupid period, although it would be epic to see a bunch of raptors charge down that Golden Gate Bridge to take on the fuzz. It's unlikely though, it's stupid to go to "war" with dinosaurs because they don't know whats going on they're just hungry mo'fuggas. 

Yeah, I just think the island thing needs to be re-done, JP4 should be original, I doubt anyone would buy these same characters going back to island for their 3rd or possibly 4th time!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 03, 2011, 05:48:33 PM
You think new characters should be brought in?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MudButt on Nov 03, 2011, 05:51:53 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 03, 2011, 05:48:33 PM
You think new characters should be brought in?

Honestly I wouldn't mind, my idea is that these new characters go to the island for whatever reason, shit goes down, people die, dinos roar n shizz. Then they escape the island, go back to where they live and then Grant, Malcolm, and whoever else would appear and shit gets intense in the mainland.

Not fully developed, but I at least want closure for the old characters if they decide to bring in a new batch to kill.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Nov 03, 2011, 06:04:06 PM
Raptors mysteriously showing up in the central american jungles and then there's this special forces investigation force trying to find out who brough them in, stop them, and all happening under the pressure of the local government and corporate wars between Biosyn and INgen?

you know, like the comic...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 03, 2011, 06:11:22 PM
I remember at one point there was an idea for the main characters to go back to Site A and actually destroy it. Sound familiar to anyone?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MudButt on Nov 03, 2011, 06:12:56 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 03, 2011, 06:11:22 PM
I remember at one point there was an idea for the main characters to go back to Site A and actually destroy it. Sound familiar to anyone?

Yeah, I remember hearing that along with Dinos carrying guns, and then the dinosaurs attacking New York during a baseball game, it had something to do with the government training soldiers to fight dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 03, 2011, 06:16:08 PM
I'd love, love, love a movie about Byosin going to site A (since site B is under protection and all that jazz) to catch up some Dinosaurs that, unknown to everyone, survived the wipeout. And we have the original Female Rex from the first film, some Dilophosauruses and, why not, some of those Raptor hatchlings we saw the footprints of. And then make the movie end with said Dinosaurs transported to Sorna. I mean, if we accept that Nublar has been bombed, it's highly unlikely anything survived, but f**k me if such a film wouldn't be all-kinds of awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Michael Harper on Nov 03, 2011, 11:58:24 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Nov 03, 2011, 06:16:08 PM
I'd love, love, love a movie about Byosin going to site A (since site B is under protection and all that jazz) to catch up some Dinosaurs that, unknown to everyone, survived the wipeout. And we have the original Female Rex from the first film, some Dilophosauruses and, why not, some of those Raptor hatchlings we saw the footprints of. And then make the movie end with said Dinosaurs transported to Sorna. I mean, if we accept that Nublar has been bombed, it's highly unlikely anything survived, but f**k me if such a film wouldn't be all-kinds of awesome.

I desperately want them to return to Nublar! Watching the lead characters walk through the original Park; but it will obviously be overground with jungle - that would be epic! :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 03, 2011, 11:59:17 PM
I would also like to see the whole host of dinosaurs revealed. Spinosaurus, Metricanthosaurus, Stegosaurus, Ankylosaurus...more than just T.Rex and Velocis.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TheMonolith on Nov 04, 2011, 12:03:27 AM
Put carcharodontosaurus in there and I am sold.
One thing that I felt sunk the last movie was not so much the script and characters (though that might have helped), but the setting didn't look right. A more interesting visual style could have helped it a great deal. I think interesting settings on Nublar or Sorna could be a big asset for the next film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Nov 04, 2011, 12:05:27 AM
I just hope Jurassic Park 4 won't be the Dino Crisis 3 of the Jurassic Park series. I have a feeling that they will have a plot of fusing Dinosaurs together or some shit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TheMonolith on Nov 04, 2011, 12:11:27 AM
I keep telling them, just do Trespasser.
Sure the game was bugged to shit but those levels looked astounding. Perfect material for a host of creative scenes. Maybe they can bring back Lex and Tim as well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 04, 2011, 12:12:03 AM
Quote from: TheMonolith on Nov 04, 2011, 12:03:27 AM
Put carcharodontosaurus in there and I am sold.
One thing that I felt sunk the last movie was not so much the script and characters (though that might have helped), but the setting didn't look right. A more interesting visual style could have helped it a great deal. I think interesting settings on Nublar or Sorna could be a big asset for the next film.

Carcharodontosaurus might be a bit much, between Spino and Rexy. Do we really need a third giant carnivore?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Nov 04, 2011, 01:08:52 AM
Carnotaurus with chameleon ability. nuff said.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Nov 04, 2011, 01:14:31 AM
If anything is going to replace Rexy I'd want it to be a carcharodontosaurus.

So +10 to Mono for the mention!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 05, 2011, 03:21:56 AM
Quote from: MudButt on Nov 03, 2011, 05:51:53 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 03, 2011, 05:48:33 PM
You think new characters should be brought in?

Honestly I wouldn't mind, my idea is that these new characters go to the island for whatever reason, shit goes down, people die, dinos roar n shizz. Then they escape the island, go back to where they live and then Grant, Malcolm, and whoever else would appear and shit gets intense in the mainland.

Not fully developed, but I at least want closure for the old characters if they decide to bring in a new batch to kill.

Brilliant!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: r888 on Nov 05, 2011, 04:39:25 AM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Nov 04, 2011, 12:05:27 AM
I just hope Jurassic Park 4 won't be the Dino Crisis 3 of the Jurassic Park series. I have a feeling that they will have a plot of fusing Dinosaurs together or some shit.

Oh dear god No

Jurassic Park in space NO NO NO
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 05, 2011, 02:33:54 PM
Universal presents

A Steven Spielberg Motion Picture

Jurassic Spaceship
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Nov 05, 2011, 03:21:26 PM
starring Winona Rider and Ron Pearlman
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: alanwu1233 on Nov 05, 2011, 03:40:55 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Nov 05, 2011, 02:33:54 PM
Universal presents

A Steven Spielberg Motion Picture

Jurassic Spaceship
Dino Crisis 3 ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 05, 2011, 03:41:35 PM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Nov 05, 2011, 03:21:26 PM
starring Winona Rider and Ron Pearlman
I'd watch it.

Quote from: alanwu1233 on Nov 05, 2011, 03:40:55 PM
Dino Crisis 3 ::)
That's the joke.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Nov 05, 2011, 04:20:10 PM
Yeah that game was a joke.  :P

Although it did have awesome boss fights.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on Nov 05, 2011, 05:06:31 PM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Nov 05, 2011, 03:21:26 PM
starring Winona Rider and Ron Pearlman

With Richard Attenborough as the ship's computer.

And Sam Neill as space.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Xenoborg on Nov 05, 2011, 05:07:07 PM
Fuse a Brachiosaur, with a Tyrannosaurus-Rex, with a Pterosaur, and with a Velociraptor (so that it can open doors).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Nov 05, 2011, 08:16:22 PM
I think it could just smash through them considering the Brachiosaur T-rex parts
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 06, 2011, 01:10:10 AM
Don't give them ideas. Uranus people everywhere...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: r888 on Nov 06, 2011, 04:50:17 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Nov 05, 2011, 02:33:54 PM
Universal presents

A Steven Spielberg Motion Picture

Jurassic Spaceship

this is making laugh big time
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 06, 2011, 12:13:41 PM
For anyone who is interested here is my Jurassic Park IV script. I wrote this years ago and it seems to be getting positive comments from people across the net  :) Enjoy.

http://www.fileden.com/files/2007/7/10/1255595/Jurassic%20Park%204%20Screenplay.pdf (http://www.fileden.com/files/2007/7/10/1255595/Jurassic%20Park%204%20Screenplay.pdf)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Nov 06, 2011, 05:09:37 PM
I hope Universal greenlights this as soon as the script is turned in. I don't care about it having to go through re-writes if needed, I just want them to greenlight it already.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 06, 2011, 10:34:08 PM
If they have to do re-writes, I doubt a greenlight will happen. I want a good movie that honours the JP name not some schlock-sci-fi trash.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Nov 06, 2011, 10:37:00 PM
Re-writes are pretty common nowadays in order to polish scripts. They're not necessarily a bad thing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Le Celticant on Nov 06, 2011, 10:44:51 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Nov 06, 2011, 10:37:00 PM
Re-writes are pretty common nowadays in order to polish scripts. They're not necessarily a bad thing.

Like Chet, which would have save us some bad moment in AVP-Requiem.  ::)
And the re-write did not change much or polished much as you believe, the movie was what it was.

The problem with a re-write is that you're still stuck with the initial plot.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Nov 06, 2011, 10:50:23 PM
Well, let's just wait and see how this turns out. Hopefully, it won't need any re-write.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Le Celticant on Nov 06, 2011, 11:08:21 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Nov 06, 2011, 10:50:23 PM
Well, let's just wait and see how this turns out. Hopefully, it won't need any re-write.

I'm not blaming you scarhunter92  ;) just I'd rather have a JPIV well thought before any greenlight.
Re-write is not necessary a bad thing as you said.
Look at the empire strike back and Vader saying he's Luke's father. It was awesome.
But it was awesome because the movie was overall great and it added something more to it.

A re-write don't change a movie, it can only help to find another path still heading to the same direction ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: r888 on Nov 07, 2011, 04:16:13 AM
Bring this guy back please

HE WAS AWESOME

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.wikia.com%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2Fd%2Fd2%2FSPINO_WP_1024.jpg&hash=68d4480b99372fbd28f548935e40825630f3204e)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.wikia.com%2Fdinosaurs%2Fimages%2F7%2F73%2FTyrannosaurus_vs_Spinosaurus.jpg&hash=e7e83e37d527041376b6efa5ba47a928351bda01)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.wikia.com%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2Fa%2Faf%2FJP3_Spinosaurus_3.JPG&hash=83aaf7ce8a574063efadf2ae6deb78c0d943ace9)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Nov 07, 2011, 04:26:27 AM
The Spino should come back if they have a re-match with The T-Rex. The Spino only won because they wanted the Spino to be the main Dinosaur of the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 07, 2011, 05:19:26 AM
Re-match sounds nice but I'm concerned it might turn the film into a versus movie. As long as it isn't drawn out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Nov 07, 2011, 08:36:32 AM
We really don't need to revisit all that, do we?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 07, 2011, 02:10:16 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Nov 07, 2011, 08:36:32 AM
We really don't need to revisit all that, do we?


Nope but we do need the Rex back as the main (large) carnivore.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 07, 2011, 03:41:16 PM
Quote from: r888 on Nov 07, 2011, 04:16:13 AM
Bring this guy back please

HE WAS AWESOME

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.wikia.com%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2Fd%2Fd2%2FSPINO_WP_1024.jpg&hash=68d4480b99372fbd28f548935e40825630f3204e)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.wikia.com%2Fdinosaurs%2Fimages%2F7%2F73%2FTyrannosaurus_vs_Spinosaurus.jpg&hash=e7e83e37d527041376b6efa5ba47a928351bda01)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.wikia.com%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2Fa%2Faf%2FJP3_Spinosaurus_3.JPG&hash=83aaf7ce8a574063efadf2ae6deb78c0d943ace9)

Spino can lick my ass.

And that last shot is so f-ing creepy.

I'm all for the re-match.  Always have been.  I don't even care how they doit.  They can play the Mortal Combat theme for all I care.  I just want Rexy boy to take back the throne.

This is beautful here.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X46Xu36U1fY# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X46Xu36U1fY#)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on Nov 07, 2011, 04:52:09 PM
Quote from: r888 on Nov 07, 2011, 04:16:13 AM
Bring this guy back please

HE WAS AWESOME

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.wikia.com%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2Fd%2Fd2%2FSPINO_WP_1024.jpg&hash=68d4480b99372fbd28f548935e40825630f3204e)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.wikia.com%2Fdinosaurs%2Fimages%2F7%2F73%2FTyrannosaurus_vs_Spinosaurus.jpg&hash=e7e83e37d527041376b6efa5ba47a928351bda01)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.wikia.com%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2Fa%2Faf%2FJP3_Spinosaurus_3.JPG&hash=83aaf7ce8a574063efadf2ae6deb78c0d943ace9)

That thing should burn in hell for eternity. As far as I'm concerned, that thing killed Jurassic Park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 07, 2011, 05:27:49 PM
Quote from: Ghost Rider on Nov 07, 2011, 04:52:09 PM
As far as I'm concerned, that thing killed Jurassic Park.

Bad writing and, to some extent, directing made JP/// a bit of a let down. Not the Spinosaur.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sylizar on Nov 07, 2011, 05:43:04 PM
If you think the Spino killed JP, you're an idiot. There was nothing wrong with its part, save for (maybe) killing the T.Rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 07, 2011, 06:24:46 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 07, 2011, 05:27:49 PM
Bad writing and, to some extent, directing made JP/// a bit of a let down.
I largely agree, just on the writing part though. Apart from coming up with the whole 'LOL LETS PUT A NEW SUPERHUGE VILLAIN IN THAR' thing, Johnston directed the movie well. A very striking example of that is perhaps my favourite part, the Pteranodon sequence. Just how he presents the Pteranodon: the mist, the vibrations on the bridge, the score crescendo, then we hear its steps, and we see a silhouette through the mist... fantastic.

Regarding the Spinosaurus, I don't really think it 'killed' Jurassic Park. It was just a bit exaggerated in places, yeah. The fact it killed the Tyrannosaurus has nothing to do with the quality of the movie itself, but rather with 'killing-off-my-childhood-hero'.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 07, 2011, 08:32:49 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Nov 07, 2011, 06:24:46 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 07, 2011, 05:27:49 PM
Bad writing and, to some extent, directing made JP/// a bit of a let down.
I largely agree, just on the writing part though. Apart from coming up with the whole 'LOL LETS PUT A NEW SUPERHUGE VILLAIN IN THAR' thing, Johnston directed the movie well. A very striking example of that is perhaps my favourite part, the Pteranodon sequence. Just how he presents the Pteranodon: the mist, the vibrations on the bridge, the score crescendo, then we hear its steps, and we see a silhouette through the mist... fantastic.

Regarding the Spinosaurus, I don't really think it 'killed' Jurassic Park. It was just a bit exaggerated in places, yeah. The fact it killed the Tyrannosaurus has nothing to do with the quality of the movie itself, but rather with 'killing-off-my-childhood-hero'.

I'll agree with most things here....
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Nov 07, 2011, 08:35:55 PM
I think JP3 suck to me because the plot was nothing special and the movie did not had the same impact as the last two movies did. I hope we go back to the park setting from JP1-2.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Le Celticant on Nov 07, 2011, 09:47:36 PM
I completely agree with you for the Pteranodon scene Omega Zilla!
It was the scene that caught me during the entire movie because it built atmosphere progressively and did not rush into the action too quick.
The rest of the movie was an average mediocre flick with a big budget and they had many possibilities to go on.
Yet they simply choose to brought some hero back to an unknown island to them that we do know (So a Unknown Known?  :D ) without real coherence and the army at the very end ruined the thing for me:
I mean, why didn't they go on the island in the first place to rescue the first group but do go later to rescue the second group?  ::)

Anyway, locations were déjà vu and felt uninspired this time compared to JP2.
The fact there weren't many scenes at night also killed the god damn movie for me.
Last thing, ALMOST everytime we see a dino on the screen in this movie... it's because he wants to kill the humans and by that way I mean... where the **** went the thing... the magic that made Jurassic Park what it was.
I want to be impress about dinosaur. I don't want to see them act like every monster movie chasing human but I want to see their behaviour, their era / world , their awesomeness and not their teeth.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on Nov 07, 2011, 11:37:54 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFUq2g3tTOw# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFUq2g3tTOw#)
You happy now?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Nov 07, 2011, 11:50:54 PM
Also have to agree with Omegazilla about the Pteranodon scene. It was build up perfectly. And when the action did hit it was awesome and plain epic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Beauty&Love on Nov 08, 2011, 12:32:42 AM
I love operation genesis I own it and its such a fun game. you know for the year it came out it was pretty damn good.

its still fun to play now and then..for me anyways.

though I wished they had more dinosaurs I love them

especially my big herbivores

omnomnomnomn
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 08, 2011, 12:43:59 PM
In my script for JPIV, Bio-syn creates a fake virus to stop anyone from venturing onto isla sorner so they can work undisturbed while they tag certain animals. They plan to take the tagged animals back to their labs for testing to find cures for cancer and other fatal illnesses. But what they underestimate is that InGen has plans to send a group of scientists to the island to try and stop the virus, which they believe is killing their animals. Obviously they discover the virus isn't real and it becomes a deadly game of cat and mouse as Bio-syn hunt the people of InGen to try and stop them from getting off the island.

I wanted it to have a die hard meets Jurassic park feel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 08, 2011, 01:59:57 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on Nov 07, 2011, 11:50:54 PM
Also have to agree with Omegazilla about the Pteranodon scene. It was build up perfectly. And when the action did hit it was awesome and plain epic.

IMO it's the only memorable scene in the movie. The reveal of the Spino following the phone ring was pretty good too but the Ptero scene was the only gripping scene in the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on Nov 08, 2011, 11:10:54 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 08, 2011, 12:43:59 PM
In my script for JPIV, Bio-syn creates a fake virus to stop anyone from venturing onto isla sorner so they can work undisturbed while they tag certain animals. They plan to take the tagged animals back to their labs for testing to find cures for cancer and other fatal illnesses. But what they underestimate is that InGen has plans to send a group of scientists to the island to try and stop the virus, which they believe is killing their animals. Obviously they discover the virus isn't real and it becomes a deadly game of cat and mouse as Bio-syn hunt the people of InGen to try and stop them from getting off the island.

I wanted it to have a die hard meets Jurassic park feel.

Wait a second..

are you Segisaurus at JPL!?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 08, 2011, 11:21:36 PM
Quote from: Gate on Nov 08, 2011, 11:10:54 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 08, 2011, 12:43:59 PM
In my script for JPIV, Bio-syn creates a fake virus to stop anyone from venturing onto isla sorner so they can work undisturbed while they tag certain animals. They plan to take the tagged animals back to their labs for testing to find cures for cancer and other fatal illnesses. But what they underestimate is that InGen has plans to send a group of scientists to the island to try and stop the virus, which they believe is killing their animals. Obviously they discover the virus isn't real and it becomes a deadly game of cat and mouse as Bio-syn hunt the people of InGen to try and stop them from getting off the island.

I wanted it to have a die hard meets Jurassic park feel.

Wait a second..

are you Segisaurus at JPL!?

I'm afraid not. Although if they're saying that is their idea for the fourth film, I can tell you its not. It is mine  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Nov 09, 2011, 12:06:06 PM
I saw all the Jurassic Park movies in the last couple of weeks. And i was suprisingly dissappointed with the lost world. The acting was a bit off sometimes and the story was pretty bad. A lot of character decisions or actions where totally unlogical. Then i saw Jurassic Park 3 and i have to say i think it is a better movie than the lost world. The acting was better. It was fast paced but not to fast. And the story was better (still not that great and original but the script was more polished at least it feels like it)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Nov 09, 2011, 01:36:29 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on Nov 09, 2011, 12:06:06 PM
I saw all the Jurassic Park movies in the last couple of weeks. And i was suprisingly dissappointed with the lost world. The acting was a bit off sometimes and the story was pretty bad. A lot of character decisions or actions where totally unlogical. Then i saw Jurassic Park 3 and i have to say i think it is a better movie than the lost world. The acting was better. It was fast paced but not to fast. And the story was better (still not that great and original but the script was more polished at least it feels like it)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgamersmafia.com%2Fstorage%2Fcomments%2F258%2F58%2Fgtfo.png&hash=7fada6f50153bf2bd39f8fe7b3396f72607fbfff)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 09, 2011, 01:37:47 PM
Inb4 TJ Doc.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 09, 2011, 03:19:27 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on Nov 09, 2011, 12:06:06 PM
I saw all the Jurassic Park movies in the last couple of weeks. And i was suprisingly dissappointed with the lost world. The acting was a bit off sometimes and the story was pretty bad. A lot of character decisions or actions where totally unlogical. Then i saw Jurassic Park 3 and i have to say i think it is a better movie than the lost world. The acting was better. It was fast paced but not to fast. And the story was better (still not that great and original but the script was more polished at least it feels like it)

How was it not too quickly paced? They killed off the T.Rex within 3 minutes of arriving on the island and the film was 30 mins less than the others.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 09, 2011, 03:28:22 PM
I honestly don't see how anyone could rate JP/// higher than The Lost World.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Nov 09, 2011, 03:51:22 PM
I liked the 3rd movie over The Lost World as well. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 09, 2011, 04:07:06 PM
Quote from: predxeno on Nov 09, 2011, 03:51:22 PM
I liked the 3rd movie over The Lost World as well. :P

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg229.imageshack.us%2Fimg229%2F7787%2F1268149138711.jpg&hash=8d56e7bf3f2731c7a0c9613387c4ed97eae9dfdb)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TJ Doc on Nov 09, 2011, 05:14:47 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Nov 09, 2011, 01:37:47 PM
Inb4 TJ Doc.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.northeastcrawlers.com%2Fnecforum%2Fimages%2Fsmilies%2Fcouch2.gif&hash=75dd2ebe569ba69aca6ddf81bc11a6c8273840c1)

I'm not particularly fond of either sequel, really. I find /// average and just think TLW sucks T. Rex scrotum.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 09, 2011, 06:32:32 PM
What is wrong with The Lost World?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sylizar on Nov 09, 2011, 06:39:55 PM
I liked both, but I preferred three as well. Probably because the Spino is one of my favorite dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 09, 2011, 07:13:01 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 09, 2011, 06:32:32 PM
What is wrong with The Lost World?

Nothing, other than the story isn't as well developed as the first film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 09, 2011, 10:12:29 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 09, 2011, 07:13:01 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 09, 2011, 06:32:32 PM
What is wrong with The Lost World?

Nothing, other than the story isn't as well developed as the first film.

Obviously, but Even so, I don't understand why a lot of people slam it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: KNIGHT on Nov 09, 2011, 10:48:25 PM
I enjoyed Lost World more than Jurassic Park III.


Until I read the actual book. After that, Lost World just dissapointed me on so many levels.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Beauty&Love on Nov 10, 2011, 12:53:02 AM
I enjoyed lost world alot too, but I think mostly for the dinosaurs. I thought it was good fun though

honestly the only thing I like about the two jjurassic park sequals is the fact its as close as I'll ever get to seeing real dinosaurs lmao //dork
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Xenoborg on Nov 10, 2011, 07:43:29 AM
I liked all three movies.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 10, 2011, 10:33:12 AM
Quote from: Jayden the Omnipotent on Nov 09, 2011, 10:48:25 PM
I enjoyed Lost World more than Jurassic Park III.


Until I read the actual book. After that, Lost World just dissapointed me on so many levels.

How could reading the book ruin the experience you had with the film? That seems really weird to me.

[rant]
So, I never understand why people compare films to the books they stem from. For me I like to have the variety. For example I enjoy watching The Lost World but I also love picking up the novel and having a different take on it. Same with every book I read that is turned into a film.   

It annoys me when I hear people complaining about a film saying things like "its nothing like the book." or "the books so much better." Well fair enough if you didn't enjoy the film but say something like "the book tells the story better." I don't get this constant drive from audiences to see films imitate the books they come from word for word. Wouldn't that be so boring? If every film did that. I know I wouldn't enjoy it because 1) books are cheaper and 2) I still think that audiences would be disappointed in the films even if they copied the books exactly.

It gets even more ridiculous when people complain about the original Jurassic Park saying it is nothing like the book, when Michael Crichton wrote the book and adapted the book to a screenplay.
[/rant]

Anyway, wooo! The Lost World! FTW!  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 10, 2011, 01:16:22 PM
People who criticize The Lost World for the creative liberties it takes regarding the source should apply the same criticism to Jurassic Park.

And I'm with you man. The Lost World for the win!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Nov 10, 2011, 11:10:42 PM
I found the whole Kirby family annoying as hell in JP3 and wished they all got eaten. I hope they won't be back for the 4th movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Nov 10, 2011, 11:16:30 PM
I liked the Kirby family; either way, what purpose would it serve for them to come back?  I doubt we'd ever be seeing them again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Effectz on Nov 10, 2011, 11:45:17 PM
JP 3 sucked,was so silly.Dr Alan grant and his Raptor Harmonica.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Nov 11, 2011, 01:27:52 AM
I was just happy that Alan Grant was back; I loved his character, the paleontologist.  They probably had Billy survive at the end just because most of the fans didn't want to see the dino experts get killed by dinos in a movie featuring prehistoric animals.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OpenMaw on Nov 11, 2011, 01:38:56 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 10, 2011, 10:33:12 AM
[rant]
So, I never understand why people compare films to the books they stem from.

Em, because the point of an adaption is to take the story, characters, and places from one form of media and put it into another.  That's because people loved those characters, stories, and places  so much that they want to see them come to life in some other medium.

To needlessly change/botch up the source material is basically the biggest sin you can commit when adapting. With a few exceptions. Some things need to be downsized or altered for budget or timing, but that's it!

Nevertheless I love the first two Jurassic Park movies. The third one has the combination of the previously mentioned Raptor whistle and it always felt very... Small. Like, both the first film, and Lost World felt like there was some kind of legitimate thing at stake. In the first film the stakes were rooted in the secretive corporate warfare going on, and the sense that the dinosaurs once on the loose, were literally rampaging throughout the island. In the sequel the stakes were opened as the movie went on(some would say to ridiculous levels with the Trex reaching the mainland, but still.) whereas JP3 just kinda seems to be "We're just going through the motions, here's another big dinosaur that eats things, here's some more raptors, here's some strange lab." It didn't really seem to fill in any blanks. At least the sequel tried to explore the consequences of dinosaurs existing, and continuing the theme of "life finds a way."

So I hope JP4 brings things back to the characters and actually tells a story with some sense of danger and scope to it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DJ Pu$$yface on Nov 11, 2011, 08:15:40 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Nov 10, 2011, 11:16:30 PM
I liked the Kirby family; either way, what purpose would it serve for them to come back?  I doubt we'd ever be seeing them again.

Well...

Why would Alexa or any shitbrain characters from the AVP franchise ever return in a sequal?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Xenoborg on Nov 11, 2011, 11:37:03 AM
The story of the Kirby family was conveniently concluded, I guess. I don't think the family would even want to come near a dinosaur.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 11, 2011, 07:08:31 PM
The fourth film should include every character from every movie.  Including a zombified Dennis Nedry, Eddie Carr, Dieter Stark, Donald Gennaro and Ray Arnold along with a computerized Roland Tembo.

(R.I.P Pete Postlethwaite)

Oh, and zombified Udesky, Nash, and Cooper.  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Crazy Rich on Nov 11, 2011, 07:21:42 PM
The Kirby family...

Spoiler
They fill me with so much frustration.

"ERIC! ERIC! ERIC!"

Shut the f**k up!
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 11, 2011, 07:24:06 PM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Nov 11, 2011, 07:21:42 PM
The Kirby family...

Spoiler
They fill me with so much frustration.

"ERIC! ERIC! ERIC!"

Shut the f**k up!
[close]

Hey, if you're wondering what the point of JP3 was, it was to see how a family would behave in a hostile enviroment like that.

Results:  Nothing has changed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Crazy Rich on Nov 11, 2011, 07:39:21 PM
Jurassic Park - Gold/10

The Lost World - Average/10

Jurassic Park 3 - please shut the f**k up/10
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 12, 2011, 05:32:44 AM
Quote from: Effectz on Nov 10, 2011, 11:45:17 PM
JP 3 sucked,was so silly.Dr Alan grant and his Raptor Harmonica.

I didn't mind that tool too much. I liked its implementation at the end because it seemed to work well enough. I would like to see it used in a future movie, maybe as a way to lure raptors into a trap or something.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Nov 12, 2011, 06:24:32 AM
they really should have made that movie more about Eric's survival than the goof fest with his parents and grant.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Crazy Rich on Nov 12, 2011, 06:27:50 AM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Nov 12, 2011, 06:24:32 AM
they really should have made that movie more about Eric's survival than the goof fest with his parents and grant.

Yes, it would of made it at least somewhat better.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Xenoborg on Nov 12, 2011, 06:33:36 AM
I always wanted to know how he got the T-Rex pee.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: r888 on Nov 12, 2011, 07:20:44 AM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Nov 11, 2011, 07:21:42 PM
The Kirby family...

Spoiler
They fill me with so much frustration.

"ERIC! ERIC! ERIC!"

Shut the f**k up!
[close]

Yep I didn't like that too

I also didn't like when they change the raptors
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 12, 2011, 04:48:40 PM
Quote from: The Xenoborg on Nov 12, 2011, 06:33:36 AM
I always wanted to know how he got the T-Rex pee.

I doubt he camouflaged himself and just hid behind one so I'd bet on urine gathered over the long term from puddles left behind.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 13, 2011, 01:14:12 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Nov 07, 2011, 03:41:16 PM
Quote from: r888 on Nov 07, 2011, 04:16:13 AM
Bring this guy back please

HE WAS AWESOME

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.wikia.com%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2Fd%2Fd2%2FSPINO_WP_1024.jpg&hash=68d4480b99372fbd28f548935e40825630f3204e)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.wikia.com%2Fdinosaurs%2Fimages%2F7%2F73%2FTyrannosaurus_vs_Spinosaurus.jpg&hash=e7e83e37d527041376b6efa5ba47a928351bda01)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.wikia.com%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2Fa%2Faf%2FJP3_Spinosaurus_3.JPG&hash=83aaf7ce8a574063efadf2ae6deb78c0d943ace9)

Spino can lick my ass.

And that last shot is so f-ing creepy.

I'm all for the re-match.  Always have been.  I don't even care how they doit.  They can play the Mortal Combat theme for all I care.  I just want Rexy boy to take back the throne.

This is beautful here.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X46Xu36U1fY# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X46Xu36U1fY#)

Found a similar better quality version.  Just want to post this....

(Don't mind the beginning)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJLwpo0EZEM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJLwpo0EZEM#ws)

Good JP humor...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBTV9l64EGA#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBTV9l64EGA#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: r888 on Nov 13, 2011, 04:51:45 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc01.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2Ff%2F2010%2F281%2F1%2F2%2Fdino_crisis_3_australis_sketch_by_crystal_nova1990-d30bkes.jpg&hash=408a2f881a7d0c3c6e57903f65e3c595ad278443)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffotos.trucoteca.com%2Fbajar_fondos.php%3Fbajar%3D2793.jpg&hash=323fbc74d20745265293a1a93473bda2672d6344)

Dear God
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Nov 13, 2011, 05:50:37 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Nov 13, 2011, 01:14:12 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBTV9l64EGA#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBTV9l64EGA#ws)

oh god no, latex!, my only weakness!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 13, 2011, 07:49:15 PM
Quote from: r888 on Nov 13, 2011, 04:51:45 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc01.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2Ff%2F2010%2F281%2F1%2F2%2Fdino_crisis_3_australis_sketch_by_crystal_nova1990-d30bkes.jpg&hash=408a2f881a7d0c3c6e57903f65e3c595ad278443)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffotos.trucoteca.com%2Fbajar_fondos.php%3Fbajar%3D2793.jpg&hash=323fbc74d20745265293a1a93473bda2672d6344)

Dear God

I hate that design.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 13, 2011, 08:57:29 PM
Why must that abomination Capcom calls a game be referenced amongst the good name that is Jurassic Park?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Nov 13, 2011, 09:12:28 PM
Quote from: r888 on Nov 13, 2011, 04:51:45 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc01.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2Ff%2F2010%2F281%2F1%2F2%2Fdino_crisis_3_australis_sketch_by_crystal_nova1990-d30bkes.jpg&hash=408a2f881a7d0c3c6e57903f65e3c595ad278443)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffotos.trucoteca.com%2Fbajar_fondos.php%3Fbajar%3D2793.jpg&hash=323fbc74d20745265293a1a93473bda2672d6344)

Dear God

What's wrong with these designs? ???
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 13, 2011, 10:10:07 PM
Just look at them. That thing looks like it's been eaten by maggots.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Crazy Rich on Nov 13, 2011, 10:16:08 PM
It's really, really, really dumb.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Nov 13, 2011, 10:16:39 PM
What's the story behind those creatures?  I just assumed they were incomplete attempts at cloning T-Rexes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Nov 14, 2011, 12:07:26 AM
....
They have nothing to do with JP.
They're from Dino Crisis 3. A game about murdering mutations of dinos they tried to make capable of living in space (I dont know why theyd do that but yeah)
Look at the text. I mean... I'm sure you can read, youve got a hefty post count and reply with.... I wouldnt use the word intelligent all the time but you reply with answers. So, come on now what happened there?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sylizar on Nov 14, 2011, 12:09:42 AM
I find nothing wrong with the Dinos from that game. For me the designs were the only good part about the game.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Nov 14, 2011, 12:47:03 AM
Quote from: Cap. Fitzgerald on Nov 14, 2011, 12:07:26 AM
....
They have nothing to do with JP.
They're from Dino Crisis 3. A game about murdering mutations of dinos they tried to make capable of living in space (I dont know why theyd do that but yeah)
Look at the text. I mean... I'm sure you can read, youve got a hefty post count and reply with.... I wouldnt use the word intelligent all the time but you reply with answers. So, come on now what happened there?

I know they're not from the JP franchise, I was just wondering why they looked like they had been skinned.  So the answer is they were created to survive space?  That sounds like an interesting idea, but I'm guessing the producers of the game did it wrong.  (Like you said, what purpose would space dinos serve anyway?)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 14, 2011, 02:29:16 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fart.ngfiles.com%2Fimages%2F33%2Fturkeyonastick_dinosaurs-in-space.png&hash=7aecb94e473970cce4d3dc201642740fe21994e0)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Nov 14, 2011, 07:56:52 PM
Did anyone watch The Terrible Thunderlizards?  This used to be my favorite show when I was a kid.  Basically, a group of civilized dinos mistakenly believe that the humans will be the destruction of their entire society so they send a trio of well trained "Thunderlizards" *cough* Prison Dinos *cough* to go after the humans to wipe them out.  This was my favorite episode:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHne90OqwAg# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHne90OqwAg#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Xenoborg on Nov 16, 2011, 05:40:58 PM
Those things, in Dino Crisis 3, I don't find them a threat.. They're just carnivores that can survive in space?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Nov 16, 2011, 06:28:21 PM
Just noticed that you can see Spielbergs reflection on the TV screen during the news at the end of TLW. Anyone else noticed?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MudButt on Nov 16, 2011, 06:32:33 PM
I had a strange dream that there was a teaser for this movie out, two actually. It had such an awkward cast in the movie too, there were news clips showing footage of the island and dinosaurs followed by characters investigating it, played by none other than Collin Farrell, Jonah Hill, Orlando Bloom, and The Rock. The team was put together by an evil business man.. who was played by Giancarlo Esposito (Gus from Breaking Bad). Such a strange dream.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 16, 2011, 08:07:20 PM
Quote from: War Wager on Nov 16, 2011, 06:28:21 PM
Just noticed that you can see Spielbergs reflection on the TV screen during the news at the end of TLW. Anyone else noticed?

Its a well known in joke in the JP world.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 20, 2011, 10:47:12 PM
I can't believe I've never noticed this until my sister pointed this out last night when we were watching it...

If you skip to 1:54, you can actually see Malcolm riding ontop of the Rex's nose and getting launched into the debris. COOL!!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5Co3A3fLBo#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5Co3A3fLBo#ws)

When you think about it, Spielberg has a VERY scary imagination (Hense the toilet scene)  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 21, 2011, 12:50:29 AM
Nice find! That Rex has bad aim, I must say.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 21, 2011, 10:46:35 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Nov 20, 2011, 10:47:12 PM
I can't believe I've never noticed this until my sister pointed this out last night when we were watching it...

If you skip to 1:54, you can actually see Malcolm riding ontop of the Rex's nose and getting launched into the debris. COOL!!!!

How have you not seen that all these years?!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Nov 21, 2011, 02:00:39 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 21, 2011, 10:46:35 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Nov 20, 2011, 10:47:12 PM
I can't believe I've never noticed this until my sister pointed this out last night when we were watching it...

If you skip to 1:54, you can actually see Malcolm riding ontop of the Rex's nose and getting launched into the debris. COOL!!!!

How have you not seen that all these years?!

I hadn't either. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 21, 2011, 03:12:44 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 21, 2011, 10:46:35 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Nov 20, 2011, 10:47:12 PM
I can't believe I've never noticed this until my sister pointed this out last night when we were watching it...

If you skip to 1:54, you can actually see Malcolm riding ontop of the Rex's nose and getting launched into the debris. COOL!!!!

How have you not seen that all these years?!

I was too focused on T.Rex making his entrance.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 21, 2011, 03:38:22 PM
Lol, I know.  Malcolm just blended in with the darkness surrounding Rex so well that I didn't even notice.  I really can't believe I just noticed it after watching this movie 2 million times.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Dec 05, 2011, 10:03:46 PM
Minor update!

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/Wolvie09/news/?a=50706 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/Wolvie09/news/?a=50706)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Dec 05, 2011, 10:09:40 PM
Cool 8) Just lets hope it will be good and kinda original :) Like the first Jurassic Park was pretty original for its time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 07, 2011, 04:31:27 AM
It sounds like she has the right idea, what with there being no reason if there's no substance behind it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Xenoborg on Dec 07, 2011, 07:57:37 PM
Atleast they're serious about the quality part.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MudButt on Dec 08, 2011, 05:51:38 PM
I just want Malcolm back.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Dec 08, 2011, 06:51:27 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Dec 08, 2011, 05:51:38 PM
I just want Malcolm back.

I want the jurassic park malcolm back. Not the lost world malcolm
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Dec 08, 2011, 07:41:23 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on Dec 08, 2011, 06:51:27 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Dec 08, 2011, 05:51:38 PM
I just want Malcolm back.

I want the jurassic park malcolm back. Not the lost world malcolm

Either will do its Jeff motherfinkng Goldblum.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ace3g on Dec 08, 2011, 08:05:58 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbitcast-a-sm.bitgravity.com%2Fslashfilm%2Fwp%2Fwp-content%2Fimages%2FZZ51115D36.jpg&hash=d902929ccccbf096b634b4f8fe8331441ae5e254)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Naissus on Dec 09, 2011, 02:31:20 AM
Maybe they should make a prequel about the failed attempts to recreate a lost time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Dec 09, 2011, 03:02:40 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Dec 08, 2011, 08:05:58 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbitcast-a-sm.bitgravity.com%2Fslashfilm%2Fwp%2Fwp-content%2Fimages%2FZZ51115D36.jpg&hash=d902929ccccbf096b634b4f8fe8331441ae5e254)
Oh god... how have I NEVER noticed that symbolism.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Dec 09, 2011, 06:32:22 AM
and that's how Sam Neil revolutionized the lesbian porn industry.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 09, 2011, 02:51:49 PM
 
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Dec 09, 2011, 03:02:40 AM
Oh god... how have I NEVER noticed that symbolism.
Haha neither did I, always assuming it was intended. I could find sexual symbolisms in films that most probably never intended any.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Dec 09, 2011, 03:44:32 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Dec 08, 2011, 08:05:58 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbitcast-a-sm.bitgravity.com%2Fslashfilm%2Fwp%2Fwp-content%2Fimages%2FZZ51115D36.jpg&hash=d902929ccccbf096b634b4f8fe8331441ae5e254)

I never noticed that bit of foreshadowing before!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 09, 2011, 06:57:03 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Dec 08, 2011, 08:05:58 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbitcast-a-sm.bitgravity.com%2Fslashfilm%2Fwp%2Fwp-content%2Fimages%2FZZ51115D36.jpg&hash=d902929ccccbf096b634b4f8fe8331441ae5e254)

Interesting!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Dec 11, 2011, 11:43:36 PM
I remember that it was said that 1 of the Blu-Ray discs for the Ultimate Trilogy contained a demo of the new JP game.  Does anyone know which disc it is?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: BISHOP 93 on Dec 11, 2011, 11:48:36 PM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Dec 09, 2011, 06:32:22 AM
and that's how Sam Neil revolutionized the lesbian porn industry.

HA!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 11, 2011, 11:59:18 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Dec 08, 2011, 08:05:58 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbitcast-a-sm.bitgravity.com%2Fslashfilm%2Fwp%2Fwp-content%2Fimages%2FZZ51115D36.jpg&hash=d902929ccccbf096b634b4f8fe8331441ae5e254)

I will never watch that scene the same way again :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Dec 12, 2011, 12:10:13 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Dec 11, 2011, 11:43:36 PM
I remember that it was said that 1 of the Blu-Ray discs for the Ultimate Trilogy contained a demo of the new JP game.  Does anyone know which disc it is?

That person is probably wrong.

I wouldn't make any sense.  Why would they include a demo?  What console would it be for?  PS3? X-Box 360? PC?  Some people just own Blu-Ray players, not video game consoles.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 12, 2011, 12:17:31 AM
Quote from: MrSpaceJockey on Dec 12, 2011, 12:10:13 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Dec 11, 2011, 11:43:36 PM
I remember that it was said that 1 of the Blu-Ray discs for the Ultimate Trilogy contained a demo of the new JP game.  Does anyone know which disc it is?

That person is probably wrong.

I wouldn't make any sense.  Why would they include a demo?  What console would it be for?  PS3? X-Box 360? PC?  Some people just own Blu-Ray players, not video game consoles.

If I recall, I remember reading that it came with a code for the first chapter of the game, probably for PC.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Feral_PRED on Dec 12, 2011, 12:25:08 AM
Exclusive: Steven Spielberg on Jurassic Park 4

It's been over ten years since Jurassic Park 3 hit theaters and with rumblings of them finally getting around to doing Jurassic Park 4, something hinted at by original director and producer Steven Spielberg at this year's Comic-Con,  fans of the successful franchise and dinosaur enthusiasts have been itching for any good news that it really was going to happen this time.

At today's junket for The Adventures of Tintin, ComingSoon.net and ShockTillYouDrop.com sat down with Spielberg for four glorious minutes of questions about his adaptation of Hergé's globe-trotting adventurer and we tried to quickly get in a question about their progress on Jurassic Park 4.

"I haven't been active in the last year because I've been so busy obviously on 'War Horse,' 'Tintin' and now I'm currently shooting 'Lincoln,' but right now, it's on the schedule to bring out another 'Jurassic Park.'"

Unfortunately, when we attempted to find out if it will continue on from the last movie or reboot and start from scratch, he couldn't tell us. "It's just another boring secret," he chuckled.

So yeah, sorry to say that we don't have much to add, although if Spielberg has it on his radar, that's certainly a good sign that maybe we'll see it sometime in the next few years? Fingers crossed!


http://www.shocktillyoudrop.com/news/164277-exclusive-steve-spielberg-on-jurassic-park-4 (http://www.shocktillyoudrop.com/news/164277-exclusive-steve-spielberg-on-jurassic-park-4)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 12, 2011, 12:40:24 AM
Good enough
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 12, 2011, 01:02:18 AM
At least he wants to do it. That's better than nothing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Dec 12, 2011, 02:19:43 AM
I want him directing... being a producer doesn't exactly do much good.

justlookatjurassicpark3lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Dec 12, 2011, 04:07:19 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Dec 08, 2011, 08:05:58 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbitcast-a-sm.bitgravity.com%2Fslashfilm%2Fwp%2Fwp-content%2Fimages%2FZZ51115D36.jpg&hash=d902929ccccbf096b634b4f8fe8331441ae5e254)

Having that explained... I now have a funny feeling. It's shit like that that makes JP such a great film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Dec 12, 2011, 03:17:59 PM
http://www.lastexittonowhere.com/shop/product/isla-nublar-research-team-dark-brown-t-shirt/ (http://www.lastexittonowhere.com/shop/product/isla-nublar-research-team-dark-brown-t-shirt/)
i thought this was cool maybe you might too.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lastexittonowhere.com%2Fmedia%2Fimages%2Fuploads%2Fproductimage-picture-isla-nublar-research-team-dark-brown-t-shirt-1281.jpg&hash=926208f3dd8074f386b3830f580d42a6d1e19035)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lastexittonowhere.com%2Fmedia%2Fimages%2Fuploads%2Fproductimage-picture-isla-nublar-research-team-dark-brown-t-shirt-1282.jpg&hash=df953381327f882ed3de8c944390d0b0bbc82a68)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lastexittonowhere.com%2Fmedia%2Fimages%2Fuploads%2Fproductimage-picture-isla-nublar-research-team-dark-brown-t-shirt-1283.jpg&hash=350bd8da3f13472c0db0abecf0b7f521edc6eb18)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Dec 12, 2011, 03:22:28 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on Dec 12, 2011, 03:17:59 PM
http://www.lastexittonowhere.com/shop/product/isla-nublar-research-team-dark-brown-t-shirt/ (http://www.lastexittonowhere.com/shop/product/isla-nublar-research-team-dark-brown-t-shirt/)
i thought this was cool maybe you might too.
http://www.lastexittonowhere.com/media/images/uploads/productimage-picture-isla-nublar-research-team-dark-brown-t-shirt-1281.jpg[/img
[img]http://www.lastexittonowhere.com/media/images/uploads/productimage-picture-isla-nublar-research-team-dark-brown-t-shirt-1282.jpg
http://www.lastexittonowhere.com/media/images/uploads/productimage-picture-isla-nublar-research-team-dark-brown-t-shirt-1283.jpg

Dude this is pretty awesome ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Dec 12, 2011, 05:08:34 PM
Has anyone else watched the new bluray editions of the JP trilogy?

I watched the extras. And the snips of HD scenes therein have me excited all over again to watch all three in a bluray marathon. It's amazing to see just how well the original holds up all these years later.

Somewhere in the extras Spielberg teases heavily about Nedry's Barbosol can waiting to usher in a new JP film. From his excited interviews on the disks he clearly LOVES making these films.   

I wouldn't mind seeing a reboot. The book has a deep, rich tapestry to pull from. Darker with a higher body count.  Raptors are twice as smart and deadly than the ones that showed up on film. (But they were still damn cool PG-13 killers)

I'd love to see the T-Rex river raft pursuit scene as well as the cat and mouse Raptor games with the survivors in the main building.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Dec 12, 2011, 06:10:54 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Dec 12, 2011, 05:08:34 PMI wouldn't mind seeing a reboot. The book has a deep, rich tapestry to pull from. Darker with a higher body count.  Raptors are twice as smart and deadly than the ones that showed up on film. (But they were still damn cool PG-13 killers)

I'd love to see the T-Rex river raft pursuit scene as well as the cat and mouse Raptor games with the survivors in the main building.

I agree. While I really love the movie, the book has some very interesting and suspenseful scenes in it.

Same goes for The Lost World, where I definitely prefer the book over the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Dec 12, 2011, 06:45:34 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Dec 12, 2011, 05:08:34 PM
Has anyone else watched the new bluray editions of the JP trilogy?

I watched the extras. And the snips of HD scenes therein have me excited all over again to watch all three in a bluray marathon. It's amazing to see just how well the original holds up all these years later.

Somewhere in the extras Spielberg teases heavily about Nedry's Barbosol can waiting to usher in a new JP film. From his excited interviews on the disks he clearly LOVES making these films.   

I wouldn't mind seeing a reboot. The book has a deep, rich tapestry to pull from. Darker with a higher body count.  Raptors are twice as smart and deadly than the ones that showed up on film. (But they were still damn cool PG-13 killers)

I'd love to see the T-Rex river raft pursuit scene as well as the cat and mouse Raptor games with the survivors in the main building.

When the Jurassic Park movies where released on bluray i immediatly watched them marathon style ;D So many childhood memories it made me all happy again :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Dec 12, 2011, 07:00:57 PM
Quote from: Laufey on Dec 12, 2011, 06:10:54 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Dec 12, 2011, 05:08:34 PMI wouldn't mind seeing a reboot. The book has a deep, rich tapestry to pull from. Darker with a higher body count.  Raptors are twice as smart and deadly than the ones that showed up on film. (But they were still damn cool PG-13 killers)

I'd love to see the T-Rex river raft pursuit scene as well as the cat and mouse Raptor games with the survivors in the main building.

I agree. While I really love the movie, the book has some very interesting and suspenseful scenes in it.

Same goes for The Lost World, where I definitely prefer the book over the movie.

I agree.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 12, 2011, 07:06:01 PM
The first movie borrowed very heavily from the book, and not just because it's book-made-into-movie. I'm talking about the actual dialogue. Lines from the book were used verbatim in the movie. Way I see it, we aren't going to get any closer to the book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Dec 12, 2011, 07:08:08 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 12, 2011, 07:06:01 PMThe first movie borrowed very heavily from the book, and not just because it's book-made-into-movie. I'm talking about the actual dialogue. Lines from the book were used verbatim in the movie. Way I see it, we aren't going to get any closer to the book.

True, but it could be done. Probably not going to happen though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Dec 12, 2011, 07:36:49 PM
The first movie is fine how it is and I doubt we will see a closer version of the book. If it does happen then it won't happen in my life time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Dec 12, 2011, 08:00:26 PM
OMG ! this is now my favorite family guy episode ever :P just for this one scene :laugh:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pKmXyadAMQ# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pKmXyadAMQ#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on Dec 12, 2011, 08:49:22 PM
Quote from: Laufey on Dec 12, 2011, 06:10:54 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Dec 12, 2011, 05:08:34 PMI wouldn't mind seeing a reboot. The book has a deep, rich tapestry to pull from. Darker with a higher body count.  Raptors are twice as smart and deadly than the ones that showed up on film. (But they were still damn cool PG-13 killers)

I'd love to see the T-Rex river raft pursuit scene as well as the cat and mouse Raptor games with the survivors in the main building.

I agree. While I really love the movie, the book has some very interesting and suspenseful scenes in it.

Same goes for The Lost World, where I definitely prefer the book over the movie.

Currently reading that, while I really love the movie, from what I've read so far in the book it definitely seems better.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 12, 2011, 08:53:18 PM
They're two different forms of media. I love the films and the novels equally. The novels obviously had more space for development, as there's virtually no strict limit to their length. The films, on the other part, had the limits of a theatrically released film.
Jurassic Park and The Lost World are more-or-less equally loyal to their respective novels.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Dec 12, 2011, 08:59:55 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Dec 12, 2011, 08:53:18 PMThey're two different forms of media. I love the films and the novels equally. The novels obviously had more space for development, as there's virtually no strict limit to their length. The films, on the other part, had the limits of a theatrically released film.

Jurassic Park and The Lost World are more-or-less equally loyal to their respective novels.

Of course, but that doesn't work as an explanation for everything. There's still stuff that didn't make it to the movies, for better or worse, that could have worked in either media. So in those cases it just comes down to different taste.

My concerns about The Lost World is that I didn't really like any of the main characters and that I didn't care that much for the last part of the movie, with the T-Rex on the main land, either. A problem I never had with the book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 12, 2011, 09:28:54 PM
Quote from: Laufey on Dec 12, 2011, 08:59:55 PM
Of course, but that doesn't work as an explanation for everything.
Aware of that - while what you're saying is indeed true, there are differences left 'unexplained' (I'd very personally class them as 'artistic liberties'), most of them can be explained with them being different forms of media. As a sheer example both films completely lack some of the characters of the novels - sometimes they are 'fused' within other characters (e.g. in Jurassic Park Ed Regis was fused with Donald Gennaro, and in The Lost World Thorne and Levine were heavily compacted into Malcolm). That is a very common device to simplify the plot. Some other differences were devoted to the films' rating and potential public - you'd never propose a closer adaptation of Jurassic Park to a child. The actual film we got is bearable (point in question I watched it when I was 3), the most brutal sequence of the film involves a torn arm. The horror elements in the novel are much heavier: they played it out safely in the film with Nedry's death for example, whereas in the novel it's sheer brutality (at a certain point Nedry, blinded by the venomous spit, feels something warm and viscid in his hands - which is revealed to be his own intestines).
Another thing which seems to be a constant in the franchise is the 'postponement' of some sequences - the beach Compsognathus attack was moved from Jurassic Park to The Lost World, as was the 'Tyrannosaurus and fall' sequence, the river sequence was moved from Jurassic Park to Jurassic Park III, etc. Here, that last one brings up another point - the novels aren't even marginally influenced by a budget, which is a very important factor in the films. If I recall correctly, the river sequence was cut from Jurassic Park (you can see it in some of the concept arts, I believe) for budgetary reasons, but I'd have to check that one out.
Sometimes, it's just a surprise finale too - which is featured in both Jurassic Park and The Lost World.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Dec 12, 2011, 09:35:59 PM
I don't have a problem with the movie taking some liberties with the material, as long as it results in a good movie.

As for never getting a closer adaption of Jurassic Park, I agree. But one can dream. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Dec 12, 2011, 09:48:15 PM
Yeah. T-Rex on the mainland (and how they got the script there) was the result of Spielberg geeking out and letting the little boy inside overrule the director/storyteller. Entertaining? Yes. But fist bitingly corny as hell!

Your average Hollywood director wouldn't have the pull to get that scene shot. Especially since it wasn't in the book.

I see what you're saying Omega. The book and the film having separate lives apart from each other and all. Peter Benchley's Jaws is the same way (and done by Spielberg no less) as is Stanly Kubrick's take on Steven Kings The Shining. Just classic, classic films ... but having a soul all their own, despite at times big leaps away from the source material.

That being said: There is room for a reboot. There was plenty from the book that was left out that would make it fresh if revisited. 

Off hand, I'd rather see THAT than see the military weaponizing dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The One and Only on Dec 13, 2011, 12:09:57 AM
The weaponized dinos were always a favorite of mine personally. Eswpecially when the the script for that story was written by the the man who wrote The Departed, and the his co-writer was the one and only John Sayles. The man who penned the classic creature flicks Piranha, Alligator, and The Howling. So I'd give that plot point a chance. Besides, I always heard that Hasbro, the guys behind the JP toyline were for it as well. And the current generation of lads could always use some gun weilding thunder lizards in their collections.

If that ain't happening, I've been chomping at the bit to see the color changing carnosaurs from the second novel finally put in some time in a flick.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MudButt on Dec 13, 2011, 06:53:41 AM
Weaponized dinos are a no-no. I want the fourth one to take a different direction then the whole "back to island" formula, unless it's a smart way of doing it, but I want the dinos on the mainland. I remember reading a scene about Pterodactyls attacking at a baseball game, the script was proven fake but I really like the sound of that scene, followed my new clips of a military trained force made for combating the dinosaurs. I want it to be something different, I don't want the main focus to be man vs dino is a crazy war, no, that's going for a popcorn flick, I want that to be a kind of background conflict while the old characters and new ones struggle to fix whatever situation seems to be happening while trying to survive the hell that's been brought to their home.

Maybe they go to the island in one act, or half of one, but other then that I'd like a new take on the franchise, and by new take, I mean smart! Not dinosaurs being mutated with other species, not dinosaurs holding guns, not military weapons that are dinosaurs, they need to be the same crazy, life-like, savage beasts like they've always been.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Dec 13, 2011, 09:30:40 AM
I would rather see an interplanetary Jurassic Park than weaponized dinosaurs for Christ's sake.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Dec 13, 2011, 03:06:31 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Dec 13, 2011, 09:30:40 AM
I would rather see an interplanetary Jurassic Park than weaponized dinosaurs for Christ's sake.

(weaponized) Dino-Riders on on side. (Interplanetary )Dino-Crisis on another.

And don't forget we're getting Dinosaurs vs Aliens at some point down the pipe so that will possibly be a healthy mix of the two.

I think it's only a matter of time before we see a zombie Dinosaur property. I mean, we're already half way there ... they're all dead. And Night at the Museum don't count.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Dec 13, 2011, 04:28:02 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Dec 13, 2011, 03:06:31 PMAnd don't forget we're getting Dinosaurs vs Aliens at some point down the pipe so that will possibly be a healthy mix of the two.

20 bucks say that project never takes off.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 13, 2011, 04:32:12 PM
Quote from: Laufey on Dec 12, 2011, 09:35:59 PM
As for never getting a closer adaption of Jurassic Park, I agree. But one can dream. :)
I must've expressed myself wrongly, I don't think a closer adaptation is impossible. I bet the budget nowadays can be not as restrictive as it was for the first film, for example. Don't think it's ever gonna be considered however.

Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Dec 12, 2011, 09:48:15 PM
Entertaining? Yes. But fist bitingly corny as hell!
Like the final T.Rex VS Raptors in the first one I guess.
Or Ripley against the Queen in Aliens.

Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Dec 12, 2011, 09:48:15 PM
I see what you're saying Omega. The book and the film having separate lives apart from each other and all. Peter Benchley's Jaws is the same way (and done by Spielberg no less) as is Stanly Kubrick's take on Steven Kings The Shining. Just classic, classic films ... but having a soul all their own, despite at times big leaps away from the source material.
Agreed 100%!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Dec 13, 2011, 04:40:29 PM
Am I the only one who wants them to take elements from TLW novel for the fourth film? The virus subplot was pretty cool. Also, Byosin pl0x.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on Dec 13, 2011, 04:47:41 PM
it should be like the script discussed many many pages ago. The virus was just a ruse for BioSyn and Dodges to go to the Island and procure tests on the animals' DNA whereas InGen's team is sent in to stop the virus and ultimately stop BioSyn
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Dec 13, 2011, 05:32:12 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Dec 13, 2011, 04:32:12 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Dec 12, 2011, 09:48:15 PM
Entertaining? Yes. But fist bitingly corny as hell!
Like the final T.Rex VS Raptors in the first one I guess.
Or Ripley against the Queen in Aliens.

Yep! T.Rex vs Raptors and Ripley vs Queen being of a lesser species of corn. But corn none the less! The blaring heroic theme to Jurassic Park trumpeting out when the Rex entered the frame was what pushed that scene over the top. I know it was a big crowd pleasing moment. But it would have been so much cooooler if they had been a little more subtle. 

Ripley vs Queen ... same thing. It was the slow door rise, push in close up, hero shot, and the Arnold-esque line that got us there. Seemed out of place for the film. The crowd was on their feet though (In my theater.)

They did similar things in A:R with the whole bouncy grenades shit. Wtf?

But these are the scenes that a certain breed of movie goer talk up ... big time. And that gets more butts in seats.

Quote from: scarhunter92 on Dec 13, 2011, 04:28:02 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Dec 13, 2011, 03:06:31 PMAnd don't forget we're getting Dinosaurs vs Aliens at some point down the pipe so that will possibly be a healthy mix of the two.

20 bucks say that project never takes off.

Can we have a time frame on this bet scar? I have no idea how that will be handled (live action or pixar style animation with talking dinosaurs) and if there are humans involved ... but mostly it sounds like a crazy fan boy film. They'll need a genius screenwriter ($) to pull that one off. And it sounds like they'll need that $ for effects instead.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: robogutswolfpred on Dec 13, 2011, 08:03:17 PM
wow those scenes  were're definitely not corny well maybe the tlw san diego scene but a majority of the people love those scenes including me
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Dec 13, 2011, 08:16:27 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Dec 13, 2011, 04:28:02 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Dec 13, 2011, 03:06:31 PMAnd don't forget we're getting Dinosaurs vs Aliens at some point down the pipe so that will possibly be a healthy mix of the two.

20 bucks say that project never takes off.

The comic will almost certainly happen, the movie is much less likely.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Dec 13, 2011, 09:44:21 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on Dec 13, 2011, 08:16:27 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Dec 13, 2011, 04:28:02 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Dec 13, 2011, 03:06:31 PMAnd don't forget we're getting Dinosaurs vs Aliens at some point down the pipe so that will possibly be a healthy mix of the two.

20 bucks say that project never takes off.

The comic will almost certainly happen, the movie is much less likely.

I was talking about the movie, of course.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 14, 2011, 08:41:20 PM
Why did everyone hate Rex on the mainlaind so much? It was different.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 14, 2011, 09:59:02 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 14, 2011, 08:41:20 PM
Why did everyone hate Rex on the mainlaind so much? It was different.

I absolutely loved it.  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on Dec 14, 2011, 10:57:21 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 14, 2011, 08:41:20 PM
Why did everyone hate Rex on the mainlaind so much? It was different.
I think people at the time were still recovering from shitty monster movies.. but then again I also know Godzilla came out after that..
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Xenoborg on Dec 16, 2011, 04:32:09 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 14, 2011, 08:41:20 PM
Why did everyone hate Rex on the mainlaind so much? It was different.
It was my favorite scene. But I wouldn't want a repetition of that, now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: cloverfan98 on Dec 16, 2011, 06:37:15 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 14, 2011, 08:41:20 PM
Why did everyone hate Rex on the mainlaind so much? It was different.

I really enjoy this part alot but it feels underdeveloped. How did the rexs kill all the people? I remeber reading a rumor that raptors were also on the ship which makes sense but wasn't in the movie. I LOVE TLW but its robably my least favorite JP film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Dec 16, 2011, 12:48:41 PM
Spielberg would like to see Jurassic Park in 3D.

http://comicbookmovie.com/fansites/scifimediazone/news/?a=51379 (http://comicbookmovie.com/fansites/scifimediazone/news/?a=51379)

Quote"I've always said Jurassic Park, the first one, would be really good post-converted in 3-D," Contactmusic.com quotes Spielberg. "I think James Cameron has done the greatest 3D in history with Avatar. I figure James is going to teach all of us a lesson. If we follow his precepts, more films will be post-converted, but the only movie I'm interested in post-converting is the first Jurassic."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Dec 16, 2011, 01:32:26 PM
Quote from: Laufey on Dec 16, 2011, 12:48:41 PM
Spielberg would like to see Jurassic Park in 3D.

http://comicbookmovie.com/fansites/scifimediazone/news/?a=51379 (http://comicbookmovie.com/fansites/scifimediazone/news/?a=51379)

Quote"I've always said Jurassic Park, the first one, would be really good post-converted in 3-D," Contactmusic.com quotes Spielberg. "I think James Cameron has done the greatest 3D in history with Avatar. I figure James is going to teach all of us a lesson. If we follow his precepts, more films will be post-converted, but the only movie I'm interested in post-converting is the first Jurassic."

To be honest. If it's done right. I would welcome it with open arms. Seriously would love to see a rex in 3d ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Dec 16, 2011, 01:46:32 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F29.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_lojhwwUed01r04nimo1_400.gif&hash=775e19fa4e7ab972462d6387c6d3949dec296e9d)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Dec 16, 2011, 01:48:42 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on Dec 16, 2011, 01:46:32 PM
http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lojhwwUed01r04nimo1_400.gif

LMAO :laugh:
Thanks for that :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Xenoborg on Dec 16, 2011, 04:51:10 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on Dec 16, 2011, 01:46:32 PM
http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lojhwwUed01r04nimo1_400.gif
Haha, that's actually pretty good though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 16, 2011, 07:05:40 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on Dec 16, 2011, 01:46:32 PM
http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lojhwwUed01r04nimo1_400.gif

I missed this gif.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightlord on Dec 16, 2011, 07:29:44 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on Dec 16, 2011, 01:46:32 PM
http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lojhwwUed01r04nimo1_400.gif
Ha, cool.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 16, 2011, 07:39:18 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on Dec 16, 2011, 01:46:32 PM
http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lojhwwUed01r04nimo1_400.gif

I still have that VHS :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MudButt on Dec 16, 2011, 07:45:43 PM
Me Too! Haha, the good ol' days.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Dec 16, 2011, 08:11:15 PM
I still hope we will see a Giganotosaurus in the 4th film. I always liked how awesome the Dinosaur looked:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dinowelt.de%2Fimages%2Fstories%2Fsauriere%2Fgiganotosaurus.jpg&hash=181c89fedcaf077be17ee04a3594a8a551f2202f)

I would love to a see T-Rex vs Giganotosaurus fight!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 18, 2011, 01:38:40 AM
All I see is "Hotlink".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Dec 18, 2011, 02:36:53 AM
Which is pretty awesome looking.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 18, 2011, 06:26:04 AM
It's hot.

;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Dec 18, 2011, 06:47:56 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 18, 2011, 01:38:40 AM
All I see is "Hotlink".

I didn't see that first  :-[ but I used another image now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Predator-S on Dec 18, 2011, 11:39:40 AM
It's just like an Allosaurus. But bigger.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Xenoborg on Dec 18, 2011, 12:58:15 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Dec 16, 2011, 08:11:15 PM
I still hope we will see a Giganotosaurus in the 4th film. I always liked how awesome the Dinosaur looked:

http://www.dinowelt.de/images/stories/sauriere/giganotosaurus.jpg

I would love to a see T-Rex vs Giganotosaurus fight!
I'd love to see that happen. But then, I'm just wondering if people would be annoyed when the T-Rex loses.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Dec 18, 2011, 02:55:31 PM
Leave the T-rex alone. Have the Giganotosaurus kill the Spinosaurus. Or forget the idea since its already been done, and introduce some more interesting dinosaurs. I still want to see the chameleon Carnotaurs and i'd love to see more Dilo action.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 18, 2011, 04:24:20 PM
Three large carnivores sounds nice on paper but finding screen time for them all would be disastrous. How the hell would they manage to establish that this new animal is a threat unlike Spino or Rex, whilst developing everyone and everything else?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Kol on Dec 18, 2011, 06:48:25 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 18, 2011, 04:24:20 PM
Three large carnivores sounds nice on paper but finding screen time for them all would be disastrous. How the hell would they manage to establish that this new animal is a threat unlike Spino or Rex, whilst developing everyone and everything else?

developing...   :laugh: but you're right.
since jp III it's just about getting more dinosaurs on screen and expand the time of each.
remembering the carnathosaurus, ankylosaurus, brachiosaurus & corythosaurus in jp III? no, because they we're each for  secs on screen.

i'm looking forward to a fourth installment, but the euphoria get's a little on hold, because since i became an adult, i realize how awful jp III was. and i saw it 3 times back in 2001... :)

not in context of the effects, action-seq uences or produtction-design, but of course: the story.

i'd rather would see a prequel to JP, w/o any dinosaurs but with a good story, instead of 100 species running in circles throughout the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: coolbreeze on Dec 20, 2011, 08:24:39 PM
Quote from: Kol on Dec 18, 2011, 06:48:25 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 18, 2011, 04:24:20 PM
Three large carnivores sounds nice on paper but finding screen time for them all would be disastrous. How the hell would they manage to establish that this new animal is a threat unlike Spino or Rex, whilst developing everyone and everything else?

developing...   :laugh: but you're right.
since jp III it's just about getting more dinosaurs on screen and expand the time of each.
remembering the carnathosaurus, ankylosaurus, brachiosaurus & corythosaurus in jp III? no, because they we're each for  secs on screen.

i'm looking forward to a fourth installment, but the euphoria get's a little on hold, because since i became an adult, i realize how awful jp III was. and i saw it 3 times back in 2001... :)

not in context of the effects, action-seq uences or produtction-design, but of course: the story.

i'd rather would see a prequel to JP, w/o any dinosaurs but with a good story, instead of 100 species running in circles throughout the movie.

Then it wouldn't be JP, would it?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Dec 20, 2011, 09:12:32 PM
Well if the story was about the development of the park, then yes it would.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: coolbreeze on Dec 20, 2011, 09:55:22 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on Dec 20, 2011, 09:12:32 PM
Well if the story was about the development of the park, then yes it would.

JP without dino's....ya ok...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 21, 2011, 04:33:20 AM
I was just going to say. It makes zero sense.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Dec 21, 2011, 10:34:08 AM
Quote from: coolbreeze on Dec 20, 2011, 09:55:22 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on Dec 20, 2011, 09:12:32 PM
Well if the story was about the development of the park, then yes it would.

JP without dino's....ya ok...

it would be no different than an Alien movie without The Alien or a Planet of the Apes movie without talking apes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Xenoborg on Dec 21, 2011, 01:09:51 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on Dec 21, 2011, 10:34:08 AM
...it would be no different than an Alien movie without The Alien...
Like Prometheus :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Dec 21, 2011, 01:22:35 PM
yeah, that's what I was implying :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Kol on Dec 21, 2011, 01:57:47 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 21, 2011, 04:33:20 AM
I was just going to say. It makes zero sense.

why? it would contain some ingredients techno-thrillers are basing of: corruption, espionage, science. and in the end you see how ingen creates a lil' dinosaur.

ingen vs. biosyn

Quote from: The Xenoborg on Dec 21, 2011, 01:09:51 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on Dec 21, 2011, 10:34:08 AM
...it would be no different than an Alien movie without The Alien...
Like Prometheus :D

exactly like that  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 21, 2011, 05:09:05 PM
Prometheus is establishing the Space Jockey and it still features aliens, just not aliens capital A.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Dec 21, 2011, 05:16:04 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 21, 2011, 05:09:05 PM
Prometheus is establishing the Space Jockey and it still features aliens, just not aliens capital A.

This.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: RagingDragon on Dec 21, 2011, 05:37:13 PM
What this is?  Why was it posted in 2007?  Is this for real?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8P0zPEqen2w# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8P0zPEqen2w#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Dec 22, 2011, 01:08:39 PM
Quote from: Kol on Dec 21, 2011, 01:57:47 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 21, 2011, 04:33:20 AM
I was just going to say. It makes zero sense.

why? it would contain some ingredients techno-thrillers are basing of: corruption, espionage, science. and in the end you see how ingen creates a lil' dinosaur.

ingen vs. biosyn
I've had that Jurassic Park movie in my head for a long time now. It'd still need dinosaurs, but if they weren't always the main threat, and the movie focused more on the qualities you bring up, it could work.

...But it'd still need dinosaurs or it'd cause an outrage.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 21, 2011, 05:09:05 PM
Prometheus is establishing the Space Jockey and it still features aliens, just not aliens capital A.
Jolly-well put, sir.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Kol on Dec 22, 2011, 02:20:02 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Dec 22, 2011, 01:08:39 PM
Quote from: Kol on Dec 21, 2011, 01:57:47 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 21, 2011, 04:33:20 AM
I was just going to say. It makes zero sense.

why? it would contain some ingredients techno-thrillers are basing of: corruption, espionage, science. and in the end you see how ingen creates a lil' dinosaur.

ingen vs. biosyn
I've had that Jurassic Park movie in my head for a long time now. It'd still need dinosaurs, but if they weren't always the main threat, and the movie focused more on the qualities you bring up, it could work.

...But it'd still need dinosaurs or it'd cause an outrage.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 21, 2011, 05:09:05 PM
Prometheus is establishing the Space Jockey and it still features aliens, just not aliens capital A.
Jolly-well put, sir.

of course you got theorize site B and it's very beginning of a park, than how the hurricane destroys all the fences, but that sounds too similar to JP I.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 23, 2011, 02:57:26 AM
I hate to say it now that I think about it but, I think the recent JP game gave us the best sequel possible. It continued the story in a very logical manner.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 23, 2011, 04:18:08 AM
Agreed.  It's nice to survey another situation that took place at the same time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Xenoborg on Dec 23, 2011, 06:03:20 AM
Quote from: Kol on Dec 22, 2011, 02:20:02 PM
of course you got theorize site B and it's very beginning of a park, than how the hurricane destroys all the fences, but that sounds too similar to JP I.
This reminds me of those darn twisters in Jurassic Park: Operation Genesis.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Dec 23, 2011, 01:19:15 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 23, 2011, 02:57:26 AM
I hate to say it now that I think about it but, I think the recent JP game gave us the best sequel possible. It continued the story in a very logical manner.

It sucked gameplay-wise though. :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on Dec 23, 2011, 01:24:20 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Dec 23, 2011, 01:19:15 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 23, 2011, 02:57:26 AM
I hate to say it now that I think about it but, I think the recent JP game gave us the best sequel possible. It continued the story in a very logical manner.

It sucked gameplay-wise though. :-\

Why did you go in expecting a game? It's a visual novel!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Dec 23, 2011, 01:24:40 PM
It's not really a game though is it. Dont think of it as a game at all. Its an interactive, computer generated, JP story. Nothing more.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Dec 23, 2011, 03:53:44 PM
The biggest shame about JP the game was that it didn't give you as much freedom as tell tale games normally do. Even heavy rain let you walk around as a character!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 23, 2011, 04:13:15 PM
They marketed it incorrectly. It's an interactive movie, not really a game.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Xenoborg on Dec 23, 2011, 08:17:20 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 23, 2011, 04:13:15 PM
They marketed it incorrectly. It's an interactive movie, not really a game.
Yeah you're right. If it were a game, any decision we might have made would have altered the story. But in this, the story in whole, remains the same.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Valaquen on Dec 29, 2011, 11:24:29 PM
'Jurassic Park' scientist aims to hatch a dinosaur using DNA from birds

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2079768/Jurassic-Park-scientist-aims-hatch-dinosaur-using-DNA-birds.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2079768/Jurassic-Park-scientist-aims-hatch-dinosaur-using-DNA-birds.html)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Dec 29, 2011, 11:39:04 PM
QuoteBut he adds: 'Whether it is a good idea or not is another question...'

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F_yNr7XplSofo%2FTE-NAMbSzFI%2FAAAAAAAAAF4%2FqmwSD6Wo7KY%2Fs1600%2Ft-rex-dinosaur-toilet-juras__oPt.jpg&hash=2cbfbeaf1621fbc7449ab788e70b8757878c7fc2)

When will they learn...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 30, 2011, 03:21:30 AM
Even if it worked, I have this feeling the animal wouldn't survive longer than a few minutes after hatching.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MudButt on Dec 30, 2011, 03:34:42 AM
Quote from: Valaquen on Dec 29, 2011, 11:24:29 PM
'Jurassic Park' scientist aims to hatch a dinosaur using DNA from birds

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2079768/Jurassic-Park-scientist-aims-hatch-dinosaur-using-DNA-birds.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2079768/Jurassic-Park-scientist-aims-hatch-dinosaur-using-DNA-birds.html)

It begins. Once they take over the world I'll start a colony of freedom fighters. Whoever wants in say I. And send me fifty dollars, if unable a gift card to the Home Depot would be great.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 30, 2011, 09:19:17 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 30, 2011, 03:21:30 AM
Even if it worked, I have this feeling the animal wouldn't survive longer than a few minutes after hatching.
I agree. Even if it did manage to hatch, it's very difficult it'd survive at the first try. If this scientist gets the greenlight for more experiments, perhaps we could see something. But I doubt he gets everything right at the first try. We'll see.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Vulhala on Dec 30, 2011, 09:37:40 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 30, 2011, 03:21:30 AM
Even if it worked, I have this feeling the animal wouldn't survive longer than a few minutes after hatching.

At least not the first time they tried it. I think they should leave it alone though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 30, 2011, 09:44:12 AM
Quote from: Vulhala on Dec 30, 2011, 09:37:40 AM
At least not the first time they tried it.
That's what I said. >_>
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Vulhala on Dec 30, 2011, 09:45:10 AM
I missed the part where you said that. Sorry dude  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: r888 on Jan 01, 2012, 04:47:59 AM
Can we please have this guy in it.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.wikia.com%2Fturok%2Fimages%2F4%2F4e%2FTurok-01-lg.jpg&hash=0816781f016d518254e934877b8d5cb8264fac4e)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 01, 2012, 07:54:19 AM
No.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 01, 2012, 11:31:42 AM
What sir Doom said above me. Simply no.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 01, 2012, 03:20:48 PM
If you want Turok, just wait a little longer. The film is being worked on.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Kol on Jan 02, 2012, 04:17:01 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QVXdEOiCw8#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QVXdEOiCw8#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 02, 2012, 10:46:07 PM
Quote from: Kol on Jan 02, 2012, 04:17:01 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QVXdEOiCw8#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QVXdEOiCw8#ws)

Very interesting watch.  Thanks for sharing this  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Jan 04, 2012, 04:39:03 AM
I'm a major Jurassic Park fan, and I've been watching the JP4 news closely. It has been in development hell for a long time, but it finally seems like they're going to make it. Mark Protosivich has been hired for the script, and despite what Kathleen Kennedy said, I think they're actually getting somewhere. I expect, if they don't give up again, it could be out by 2015.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 04, 2012, 05:29:32 AM
2015? We should ask Marty McFly. He would know!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sandy Tess on Jan 04, 2012, 10:08:42 PM
Quote from: evolution_rex on Jan 04, 2012, 04:39:03 AM
I'm a major Jurassic Park fan, and I've been watching the JP4 news closely. It has been in development hell for a long time, but it finally seems like they're going to make it. Mark Protosivich has been hired for the script, and despite what Kathleen Kennedy said, I think they're actually getting somewhere. I expect, if they don't give up again, it could be out by 2015.

2015? Better than nothing. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 04, 2012, 11:41:33 PM
2015 is three years away so that seems likely. I wish we could get some news about what they're planning for it though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Jan 05, 2012, 02:07:39 AM
Not to advertize or anything, but I usually get my news from here: http://www.jplegacy.org/index2.php (http://www.jplegacy.org/index2.php)

This is some recent news for JP4 and the timeline of events:

-Steven Spielberg says he is working with Mark Protosivich on the script (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/steven-spielberg-brainstorming-jurassic-park-200911 (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/steven-spielberg-brainstorming-jurassic-park-200911))

-Joe Johnston says something about it. He's the most likely one to direct the film. (http://screenrant.com/joe-johnston-jurassic-park-4-captain-america-director-rothc-123898/ (http://screenrant.com/joe-johnston-jurassic-park-4-captain-america-director-rothc-123898/))

-Steven confirms JP4 at Comic-Con (sorry, can't find a link for it.)

-JPLegacy member Gui3232 (Artist Julien Romeo) met with Spielberg and he says that they'll still use animatronics for the film.

-Spielberg says that its time for him to work on JP4 now that he's finished War Horse (http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=85034 (http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=85034))

-Kennedy claims they haven't gotten anywhere with the script, however I don't think I can believe her after Spielberg's words. (http://jurassicparkiv.org/forum/index.php?topic=404.0 (http://jurassicparkiv.org/forum/index.php?topic=404.0))

Those are, to me, the big pieces of news. Joseph Mozello (Tim Murphy) has expressed his interest to be in a fourth film and there has been rumors of Bradley Cooper, but Bradley Cooper would be unlikely.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 05, 2012, 05:52:01 AM
That would be shocking! Brad Cooper, sci-fi? Can't picture that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Jan 05, 2012, 05:54:37 AM
Having Mozello come back would be nice. He was outstanding in The Pacific.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MudButt on Jan 05, 2012, 05:58:04 AM
Their are so many stories that are possible, this movie could go in different directions, but it's obvious that those Pterodactyls that escaped at the end of 3 need to be dealt with!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Jan 05, 2012, 06:02:13 AM
It's funny, in the new interviews on the JP Trilogy set, Spielberg mentions that they could have crafted a story around the missing shaving cream bottle. He even mentions that he filmed it falling down the hill to imply that it's sitting there waiting to be found. Or something to that extent. Don't know what he said verbatim.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MudButt on Jan 05, 2012, 06:08:12 AM
I remember hearing about that too, I mean it's obviously a story too. Mercenaries get sent to retrieve it and sh*t gets intense.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 05, 2012, 06:12:07 AM
That's the premise of the JP game, which is why I before it gave us the best sequel possible.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Kol on Jan 05, 2012, 01:03:07 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Jan 05, 2012, 06:02:13 AM
It's funny, in the new interviews on the JP Trilogy set, Spielberg mentions that they could have crafted a story around the missing shaving cream bottle.

this scene was shot to guarantee a direct sequel, that was the purpose of this particular scene.
but after chrichton publishing "the lost world", he decided to go with the story of side-b.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on Jan 05, 2012, 04:51:10 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jan 05, 2012, 05:58:04 AM
Their are so many stories that are possible, this movie could go in different directions, but it's obvious that those Pterodactyls that escaped at the end of 3 need to be dealt with!
Not to be a dick, but those were Pterenanodons. Pterodactyls were more lizardlike than Pteranodons.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 05, 2012, 04:58:59 PM
Yeah, but 'Pterodactyls' is a term that's been accepted to indicate generally Pterosaurs... like 'Raptor' fits for Dromeosauridae.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MudButt on Jan 05, 2012, 05:09:40 PM
Quote from: Gate on Jan 05, 2012, 04:51:10 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jan 05, 2012, 05:58:04 AM
Their are so many stories that are possible, this movie could go in different directions, but it's obvious that those Pterodactyls that escaped at the end of 3 need to be dealt with!
Not to be a dick, but those were Pterenanodons. Pterodactyls were more lizardlike than Pteranodons.

Eh they all fly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 05, 2012, 05:43:31 PM
Pterodactyl is just a generic term for pterosaur. There was a pterosaur named Pterodactylus, however.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 05, 2012, 05:44:35 PM
Exactly what I said.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 05, 2012, 05:46:15 PM
Didn't see your post until now. And you didn't mention the second part ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MudButt on Jan 05, 2012, 06:31:48 PM
Okay I'm sorry about the mix up guys, they were Pterenanodons. Now lets talk about the Allosaurs, I mean tyrannosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Kol on Jan 05, 2012, 08:02:08 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jan 05, 2012, 06:31:48 PM
Okay I'm sorry about the mix up guys, they were Pterenanodons. Now lets talk about the Allosaurs, I mean tyrannosaurs.

lol  :D

good-one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Jan 05, 2012, 09:01:52 PM
I would not be surprised if the plot of Jurassic Park: The Game was used for the fourth film, but I find that it would just screw over the established canon. Currently, JP: The Game is considered canon by most fans, and we'll have to wait for this film to know if it will still be canon.

The plot for JP: The Game was actually very good for the JP franchise. The game, although I haven't played it, had bad gameplay, but it's story and voice acting is what most people have been talking about. Not to mention it seemed that they created the right atmosphere of the first film. I'd call the game a fourth film within itself, and I hope the Spielberg looks at if for ideas of the new film.

But, from the looks of things, I think they have a story. We can only hope its a good one. Better than JP3, at least.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Xenoborg on Jan 05, 2012, 09:09:18 PM
Quote from: evolution_rex on Jan 05, 2012, 09:01:52 PM
I would not be surprised if the plot of Jurassic Park: The Game was used for the fourth film, but I find that it would just screw over the established canon. Currently, JP: The Game is considered canon by most fans, and we'll have to wait for this film to know if it will still be canon.

The plot for JP: The Game was actually very good for the JP franchise. The game, although I haven't played it, had bad gameplay, but it's story and voice acting is what most people have been talking about. Not to mention it seemed that they created the right atmosphere of the first film. I'd call the game a fourth film within itself, and I hope the Spielberg looks at if for ideas of the new film.

But, from the looks of things, I think they have a story. We can only hope its a good one. Better than JP3, at least.
I consider it a movie, itself.
Just an interactive one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Naissus on Jan 06, 2012, 12:08:17 AM
If Prometheus becomes a hit, which I am sure it will.  I wonder if Steven Spielberg will look into making a prequel about the beginning of the park or a move related to Jurassic Park and has dinos but a different set of circumstances and characters that is isolated from the trilogy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Jan 06, 2012, 12:17:17 AM
Quote from: The Xenoborg on Jan 05, 2012, 09:09:18 PM
I consider it a movie, itself.
Just an interactive one.

Haven't played the game myself, but does it mention if the mercenaries sent to find the canister are part of Biosyn - the group Dodgson belonged to?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 06, 2012, 12:50:11 AM
Quote from: evolution_rex on Jan 05, 2012, 09:01:52 PM
I would not be surprised if the plot of Jurassic Park: The Game was used for the fourth film, but I find that it would just screw over the established canon. Currently, JP: The Game is considered canon by most fans, and we'll have to wait for this film to know if it will still be canon.

The plot for JP: The Game was actually very good for the JP franchise. The game, although I haven't played it, had bad gameplay, but it's story and voice acting is what most people have been talking about. Not to mention it seemed that they created the right atmosphere of the first film. I'd call the game a fourth film within itself, and I hope the Spielberg looks at if for ideas of the new film.

But, from the looks of things, I think they have a story. We can only hope its a good one. Better than JP3, at least.

lol wut

Quote from: First Blood on Jan 06, 2012, 12:17:17 AM
Quote from: The Xenoborg on Jan 05, 2012, 09:09:18 PM
I consider it a movie, itself.
Just an interactive one.

Haven't played the game myself, but does it mention if the mercenaries sent to find the canister are part of Biosyn - the group Dodgson belonged to?

Yup, that's the one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Kol on Jan 06, 2012, 02:14:49 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Jan 06, 2012, 12:17:17 AM
Quote from: The Xenoborg on Jan 05, 2012, 09:09:18 PM
I consider it a movie, itself.
Just an interactive one.

Haven't played the game myself, but does it mention if the mercenaries sent to find the canister are part of Biosyn - the group Dodgson belonged to?

only nima (the mexican girl) and this guy who seems to be the one who talks to nedry in JP. that guy on that fake-video.
the mercenaries, you mentioned, were send by in-gen to rescue the remaining survivors.

i liked the voices much, but the quality was shit. in the english version it sometimes has delay on the voices, an echo and a lot of unsensitive cuts. when you play it in german it's even worse; they repeat sometimes the spoken line and don't reveal the next sentence.

but the story was very good, also the setting (goddamn JURASSIC PARK!) and it would've been a descent movie after all. the gameplay, kinda sucks... 6/10.

i would say it; was a pleasant disappointment  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Jan 06, 2012, 05:18:41 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 06, 2012, 12:50:11 AM
Quote from: evolution_rex on Jan 05, 2012, 09:01:52 PM
I would not be surprised if the plot of Jurassic Park: The Game was used for the fourth film, but I find that it would just screw over the established canon. Currently, JP: The Game is considered canon by most fans, and we'll have to wait for this film to know if it will still be canon.

The plot for JP: The Game was actually very good for the JP franchise. The game, although I haven't played it, had bad gameplay, but it's story and voice acting is what most people have been talking about. Not to mention it seemed that they created the right atmosphere of the first film. I'd call the game a fourth film within itself, and I hope the Spielberg looks at if for ideas of the new film.

But, from the looks of things, I think they have a story. We can only hope its a good one. Better than JP3, at least.

lol wut
I based my opinion off the ratings and reviews I've seen and read. I don't see a problem in that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 06, 2012, 06:40:55 AM
The game didn't have bad gameplay. Take it from someone who actually played and completed it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Jan 06, 2012, 10:50:22 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 05, 2012, 05:52:01 AM
That would be shocking! Brad Cooper, sci-fi? Can't picture that.

Cooper is in Limitless which is sort of Sci Fi.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gazz on Jan 06, 2012, 11:48:44 AM
Cooper is also a massive sci-fi nerd at heart. He's writing an adaptation of Hyperion which he has also voiced an interest in directing.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Jan 06, 2012, 11:51:30 AM
really?

not sure why he'd bother, Dan Simmons himself has written scripts for Hyperion and the project even got a director and then it completely stopped moving forward
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gazz on Jan 06, 2012, 12:11:18 PM
http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Bradley-Cooper-Talks-About-Writing-Hyperion-Movie-28313.html (http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Bradley-Cooper-Talks-About-Writing-Hyperion-Movie-28313.html)

QuoteIf you're at work or can't watch the video, here's the gist: Cooper and his writing partner wrote a treatment for the movie on spec (that's Hollywood for "for free") and approached the rights holders for the books. Apparently their treatment was solid, because they got the gig. Now, in an interview with Metro, Cooper has provided a brief update:

"I want to direct. My writing partner and I are adapting The Hyperion Cantos by Dan Simmons, a sci-fi writer. It's a four-book series. It's not that I thought I wanted to do something unreachable: I just love the material and we're having a crack at it. We wrote a 40-page treatment and we'll start working on it in the summer."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Jan 06, 2012, 12:41:36 PM
awesome, this needs to be a thread!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Jan 06, 2012, 09:08:47 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 06, 2012, 06:40:55 AM
The game didn't have bad gameplay. Take it from someone who actually played and completed it.
I've took it from other who've played it before, who are also big JP fans themselves, and admit that the game play wasn't the greatest.

It's your opinion. My opinion is that it's bad. It may change if I played the game, but for now I'm sticking with my opinion.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Jan 06, 2012, 09:14:12 PM
No offence but that's ridiculous. You cant have an opinion on something if you havnt actually experienced it yourself. Actually i'll rephrase that, you can have an opinion on something you havnt experienced but nobody will value that opinion one iota.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Jan 06, 2012, 09:17:42 PM
Okay then, so all the reviews that are made are just made for no f**king reason? I can't take them into consideration? What the hell are they there for?

Okay, I'll change my phrasing. My opinion is that it looks bad. better?

f**king Christ, people.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 06, 2012, 10:04:50 PM
The reviews are written by people who have experienced it. Big difference.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Kol on Jan 07, 2012, 02:47:29 PM
Quote from: evolution_rex on Jan 06, 2012, 09:17:42 PM
Okay then, so all the reviews that are made are just made for no f**king reason? I can't take them into consideration? What the hell are they there for?

Okay, I'll change my phrasing. My opinion is that it looks bad. better?

f**king Christ, people.

don't let them intimidate you. your friend is right and all the reviews: the gameplay just sucks.
the whole game is just one series of quick-time-events; that's all.
it's not even possible to walk by yourself.

and an actual game w/a gameplay from the 90's, wil be objectively rejected.

but only in gameplay, as i mentioned it in my other post before.
but games like COD are even worse.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Jan 07, 2012, 08:23:06 PM
Why are we even talking about the game, anyway? This thread is about the possible fourth film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Jan 07, 2012, 08:24:14 PM
This has pretty much acted as the general Jurassic Park thread since a long time ago.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 08, 2012, 09:41:43 AM
Someone should erase the 'IV' from the title, then.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jan 08, 2012, 10:30:28 AM
It's not a big deal.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 08, 2012, 01:21:14 PM
If it misleads people into thinking that this thread is dedicated to the "upcoming" fourth Jurassic Park film, it may not be a big deal but of considerable proportions.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Jan 08, 2012, 03:21:20 PM
It's not an opinion, it's a preconception, there's a difference, you can't have an opinion on something you haven't experienced.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 08, 2012, 04:21:03 PM
Some odd mentioning here and there of JP-related material is no biggie as long as we don't lose sight of what the fourth film is really about. And considering there hasn't been any new info on a 4th film lately, other JP-related discussion is no big deal.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Jan 09, 2012, 03:22:28 AM
Quote from: AvatarIII on Jan 08, 2012, 03:21:20 PM
It's not an opinion, it's a preconception, there's a difference, you can't have an opinion on something you haven't experienced.
If you had read another post I wrote, I rephrased it. I think the gameplaylooks bad. That is an opinion. I find it irritating that everyone gives a f**k about it.

To get back on topic, I believe the plot for the fourth film won't be a prequel. It would be so awesome if it was, and it would be the best way to go, but they won't do it. Too many issues with casting. It will most likely be a sequel, or possible a reboot. I'm hoping for a sequel over a reboot.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Jan 09, 2012, 10:13:01 AM
Quote from: evolution_rex on Jan 09, 2012, 03:22:28 AM
Quote from: AvatarIII on Jan 08, 2012, 03:21:20 PM
It's not an opinion, it's a preconception, there's a difference, you can't have an opinion on something you haven't experienced.
If you had read another post I wrote, I rephrased it. I think the gameplaylooks bad. That is an opinion. I find it irritating that everyone gives a f**k about it.

To get back on topic, I believe the plot for the fourth film won't be a prequel. It would be so awesome if it was, and it would be the best way to go, but they won't do it. Too many issues with casting. It will most likely be a sequel, or possible a reboot. I'm hoping for a sequel over a reboot.

yeah sorry about that, i posted not realising that there was another page of discussion.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MudButt on Jan 13, 2012, 05:28:48 PM
Spielberg says he won't be directing it, but producing it.

http://worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=23798&count=0 (http://worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=23798&count=0)

That's not the best news, at least he's attached, but I wish he'd direct it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 13, 2012, 05:55:01 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jan 13, 2012, 05:28:48 PM
Spielberg says he won't be directing it, but producing it.

http://worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=23798&count=0 (http://worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=23798&count=0)

That's not the best news, at least he's attached, but I wish he'd direct it.

:(

Same here, mate.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightlord on Jan 13, 2012, 05:55:43 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jan 13, 2012, 05:28:48 PM
Spielberg says he won't be directing it, but producing it.

http://worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=23798&count=0 (http://worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=23798&count=0)

That's not the best news, at least he's attached, but I wish he'd direct it.
Once we find out who's directing, then we'll see if this good news or bad news.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 13, 2012, 08:56:10 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jan 13, 2012, 05:28:48 PM
Spielberg says he won't be directing it, but producing it.

http://worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=23798&count=0 (http://worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=23798&count=0)

That's not the best news, at least he's attached, but I wish he'd direct it.

If it's Joey again, I'm off.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Jan 13, 2012, 09:36:11 PM
he's a good director though, captain america was awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 13, 2012, 10:32:16 PM
I'd be fine with Joe coming back. JP3's direction wasn't bad in any way. The delicated matter is the script.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jan 13, 2012, 10:34:30 PM
Really wish Speilberg was directing, sucks to here we won't getting his vision back.

I would have no problems with Joe coming back, but don't let a JP3 screenwriter NEAR this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Jan 13, 2012, 10:37:02 PM
If they can get ahold of David Koepp...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 13, 2012, 11:07:50 PM
It'd be great if we got the Straus bros to direct this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Jan 13, 2012, 11:19:46 PM
Surely you jest?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Jan 13, 2012, 11:27:56 PM
My problem with JP3 wasn't Joe, it was the uninspired script. Johnston clearly loves the franchise. Get a good script, and I'll be perfectly fine with him directing again. Especially after seeing Captain America.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Jan 14, 2012, 12:36:59 AM
I would be more then happy if Joe returns as the director. But we need a good script ! Joe wasn't jp3's problem.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Jan 14, 2012, 05:28:47 AM
I'm not disappointed to hear that Speilberg won't be directing it. It was expected.

And with the exception of a few films, Joe Johnston is a good director. Given a good story, he can preform his job well. I wouldn't mind some one else stepping in either, but if it's not Johnston, then it probably won't be any big time directors.

but in other news: http://www.fansshare.com/news/jurassic-park-4-script-to-begin-this-year/ (http://www.fansshare.com/news/jurassic-park-4-script-to-begin-this-year/)

It finally seems to me that their getting somewhere now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jan 14, 2012, 06:44:03 AM
I was mining youtube for examples of special effects puppetry and masks and I stumbled upon this little gem. I'll just leave this here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Isoz0KEvLSo# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Isoz0KEvLSo#)

I wished I was that talented. I would have put an actor in a green suit and brushed him out of the scene, leaving the raptor.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on Jan 14, 2012, 08:42:53 PM
Not to mention JPIII was almost 10 years ago. Johnston's obviously improved in the time, and he was always intended to direct a 4th film according to many articles.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2012, 08:56:07 PM
Quote from: evolution_rex on Jan 14, 2012, 05:28:47 AM
I'm not disappointed to hear that Speilberg won't be directing it. It was expected.

And with the exception of a few films, Joe Johnston is a good director. Given a good story, he can preform his job well. I wouldn't mind some one else stepping in either, but if it's not Johnston, then it probably won't be any big time directors.

but in other news: http://www.fansshare.com/news/jurassic-park-4-script-to-begin-this-year/ (http://www.fansshare.com/news/jurassic-park-4-script-to-begin-this-year/)

It finally seems to me that their getting somewhere now.

We need Goldblum and Neill back on screen together. Naow.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Jan 15, 2012, 05:03:59 AM
I wouldn't mind some of the original cast again, but only if it makes sense for them to be there. JP3 stretched it with bringing Alan Grant to Sorna, and It's going to have to be a pretty well thought out plot in order to bring them back in.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: r888 on Jan 15, 2012, 06:23:07 PM
I want to see Ian back on the island I like him in the lost world
I wouldn't mind seeing him again
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jan 15, 2012, 06:38:24 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmichaeljswart.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F05%2FJurassic.png&hash=8ff9ebd56f012b20cbaabb70268d91760afdf220)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: RagingDragon on Jan 15, 2012, 06:59:56 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Jan 15, 2012, 06:38:24 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmichaeljswart.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F05%2FJurassic.png&hash=8ff9ebd56f012b20cbaabb70268d91760afdf220)
Ahahahahaha shit Marines, why you make me think about things like this? 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: r888 on Jan 16, 2012, 01:21:11 AM
 Can we get the chameleon-skin Carnotaurus from lost world arcade game

http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=L99J40Xs49c (http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=L99J40Xs49c)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 16, 2012, 02:06:50 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Jan 15, 2012, 06:38:24 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmichaeljswart.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F05%2FJurassic.png&hash=8ff9ebd56f012b20cbaabb70268d91760afdf220)

Hey, it was hasn't Hammond's fault Nedry was a greedy pig.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jan 16, 2012, 05:08:18 AM
It was his fault he hired the guy who bid lowest.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jan 16, 2012, 07:03:33 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jan 14, 2012, 08:42:53 PM
Not to mention JPIII was almost 10 years ago. Johnston's obviously improved in the time, and he was always intended to direct a 4th film according to many articles.

JP3 came out July 2001, it been over 10 years and I wish fans would move on about the film since it's not that bad of a movie. Johnston already said he was sorry for JP3 and the Wolfman remake, I would give him another chance.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 16, 2012, 02:00:23 PM
Quote from: r888 on Jan 16, 2012, 01:21:11 AM
Can we get the chameleon-skin Carnotaurus from lost world arcade game

http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=L99J40Xs49c (http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=L99J40Xs49c)

Damn, that sonofabitch is hard to kill.  Never had the privalage of playing that one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Jan 17, 2012, 02:20:45 AM
Johnston really isn't that bad of a directer. He's directed a lot of good films. JP3 wasn't that bad of a movie either, it just looks worse compared to the previous installments. I wouldn't mind Johnston as the directer, just as long as he's learned his lesson from JP3.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MykeHavoc on Jan 17, 2012, 05:48:49 AM
Johnston is a fine director. JP3 gets a lot of shit, but its an entertaining film. No worse than Lost World.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 19, 2012, 12:06:56 AM
No, it was worse than TLW. It was too short, not enough action, too much of a family adventure vibe, and almost no T.Rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Jan 19, 2012, 12:57:04 AM
all script problems, in directing it was fine.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 19, 2012, 10:33:50 AM
Quote from: chupacabras acheronsis on Jan 19, 2012, 12:57:04 AM
all script problems, in directing it was fine.

This.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jan 19, 2012, 08:12:18 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 19, 2012, 12:06:56 AM
No, it was worse than TLW. It was too short, not enough action, too much of a family adventure vibe, and almost no T.Rex.

I guess people like JP3 better because it didn't try to incorporate any PETA-style messages like in the second movie?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 19, 2012, 08:21:51 PM
Meh, those didn't bother me. It's only one scene in TLW that was pro-animal fights and such, when Ian and his team are pulled up from the cliff edge.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jan 19, 2012, 08:26:49 PM
I know people who like JP3 better because they know it was going to suck compare to the second movie where they had high hopes for.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Jan 19, 2012, 08:55:13 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 19, 2012, 08:21:51 PM
Meh, those didn't bother me. It's only one scene in TLW that was pro-animal fights and such, when Ian and his team are pulled up from the cliff edge.

And when they let the dinosaurs loose, or steals the ammo from the hunters...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on Jan 19, 2012, 10:07:39 PM
PSN's offline and I wanna download Episode 4 of the Game -_-
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 20, 2012, 12:06:35 AM
Quote from: Laufey on Jan 19, 2012, 08:55:13 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 19, 2012, 08:21:51 PM
Meh, those didn't bother me. It's only one scene in TLW that was pro-animal fights and such, when Ian and his team are pulled up from the cliff edge.

And when they let the dinosaurs loose, or steals the ammo from the hunters...

That was subtle though. There wasn't any in-your-face type of dialogue.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park
Post by: Space Sweeper on Feb 02, 2012, 10:30:29 PM
This thread really should just have a name change to 'Jurassic Park' so that it covers all entries in the series, as it has been.



New(?) pic from the Stan Winston School Character Arts Facebook page:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fa2.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-ak-ash4%2F421345_318232218212452_130940650274944_789423_754024401_n.jpg&hash=67d8e598077ae7a1a97d5661dc2f92330a13a09f)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Feb 02, 2012, 10:32:06 PM
Just imagine being on that set. Must have been awesome. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park
Post by: King Rathalos on Feb 02, 2012, 10:53:33 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Feb 02, 2012, 10:30:29 PM

New(?) pic from the Stan Winston School Character Arts Facebook page:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fa2.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-ak-ash4%2F421345_318232218212452_130940650274944_789423_754024401_n.jpg&hash=67d8e598077ae7a1a97d5661dc2f92330a13a09f)
:o

Oh my god, even in broad lighting it looks like a real goddamned dinosaur...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 02, 2012, 11:10:37 PM
Grossly oversized too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 02, 2012, 11:13:05 PM
The size of the Jurassic Park T.Rex was spot-on. Consider that in that picture there's a camera angle making it look bigger.
And even if it was -- it's a work of fiction. Who cares. We have frilled Dinosaurs in the same motion picture.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Feb 02, 2012, 11:14:05 PM
Seriously, who cares if the rex is too big.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 02, 2012, 11:15:41 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 02, 2012, 11:13:05 PM
The size of the Jurassic Park T.Rex was spot-on. Consider that in that picture there's a camera angle making it look bigger.
And even if it was -- it's a work of fiction. Who cares. We have frilled Dinosaurs in the same motion picture.

I know it was a work of fiction. Hence why the size wasn't spot-on in every scene. I don't actually care, I'm just saying it out loud.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 02, 2012, 11:18:43 PM
The size was always the same - it's the camera angle that creates the illusion of it being bigger or smaller (like when it bursts out of the trees). It's a recurring thing with big creatures - see the 2005 King Kong creatures, the 1998 Godzilla, and so on and so forth.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 02, 2012, 11:41:51 PM
A T.Rex skull wasn't that big. The average Rex skull is only about 1 metre length, with the largest being 1.5 metres. That's shorter than the average human, ergo one human won't fit entirely into its mouth like the lawyer did.

And no, the size wasn't always the same. Go rewatch the movie. The Rex head that exploded through the Jeep roof was noticeably larger than the Rex head that overturned said car 5 seconds later or killed the Velociraptor at the end.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Feb 02, 2012, 11:52:35 PM
I JUST LIKE PRETTY PICTURES.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 02, 2012, 11:53:05 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 02, 2012, 11:41:51 PM
ergo one human won't fit entirely into its mouth like the lawyer did.
Again? Dejavù all over here, man. I already replied to this point once in this thread.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5Co3A3fLBo#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5Co3A3fLBo#ws)
2:12... Gennaro's legs hang from outside the T.Rex's mouth. Ergo, he doesn't fit entirely.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 02, 2012, 11:41:51 PM
And no, the size wasn't always the same. Go rewatch the movie. The Rex head that exploded through the Jeep roof was noticeably larger than the Rex head that overturned said car 5 seconds later or killed the Velociraptor at the end.
As said - it's an illusion created by camera angles.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Mike’s Monsters on Feb 02, 2012, 11:59:41 PM
The rex is much closer to the camera in that set picture than everyone else in the shot, which makes him look HUGE. I had to double take when I saw the shot.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 03, 2012, 12:12:56 AM
Listen to the guy, he knows stuff about photography!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Novak 1334 on Feb 03, 2012, 12:13:25 AM
The thought that a Spinosaurus could survive a neck bite from a T-Rex and go on to kill the T- Rex has put me off a sequel forever.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 03, 2012, 12:31:53 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 02, 2012, 11:53:05 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 02, 2012, 11:41:51 PM
ergo one human won't fit entirely into its mouth like the lawyer did.
Again? Dejavù all over here, man. I already replied to this point once in this thread.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5Co3A3fLBo#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5Co3A3fLBo#ws)
2:12... Gennaro's legs hang from outside the T.Rex's mouth. Ergo, he doesn't fit entirely.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 02, 2012, 11:41:51 PM
And no, the size wasn't always the same. Go rewatch the movie. The Rex head that exploded through the Jeep roof was noticeably larger than the Rex head that overturned said car 5 seconds later or killed the Velociraptor at the end.
As said - it's an illusion created by camera angles.

One thing is for sure.....

I WOULD TOTALLY SHIT MY PANTS IF I WAS IN THAT SITUATION
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Mike’s Monsters on Feb 04, 2012, 01:15:04 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 03, 2012, 12:12:56 AM
Listen to the guy, he knows stuff about photography!

^ Yes.

<--- Photographer.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 06, 2012, 03:44:43 AM
I saw Jurassic Park in theatres last night. And doing so again, Tuesday afternoon.

I can't begin to tell you all. How this film made me feel...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Basher917 on Feb 06, 2012, 03:49:05 AM
after seeing the lawyer get eaten by the tyrannosaurus rex...


i want some pork
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 06, 2012, 03:49:45 AM
What's the connection in your mind?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Basher917 on Feb 06, 2012, 04:12:43 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 06, 2012, 03:49:45 AM
What's the connection in your mind?

well see, when his legs are sticking out of it's mouth reminds me of stuffing myself full of tender meat.

now when the T-Rex begins to flail it's food about it reminds me of attacking a freshly cooked pork chop. I proceed to cut the delicious meat until i begin to wonder why i'm putting so much thought into serving the perfectly ready-to-eat pork, so i then take my ridiculously oversized slice of pork and shove it into my mouth, where the tender juices begin to spew out of my mouth with some of the meat witch i couldn't fit in.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 06, 2012, 05:02:21 AM
Suddenly, I want some bacon. Damn you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: r888 on Feb 19, 2012, 05:29:55 AM
f**k YEAH

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc04.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2Ff%2F2010%2F330%2F5%2Fa%2Fjp_pteranodon_with_plagas_by_hellraptor-d33mfte.jpg&hash=a4b4d823c040cbd43c427fb8ca0b30396fc8f530)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Feb 19, 2012, 12:48:43 PM
Quote from: r888 on Feb 19, 2012, 05:29:55 AM
f**k YEAH

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc04.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2Ff%2F2010%2F330%2F5%2Fa%2Fjp_pteranodon_with_plagas_by_hellraptor-d33mfte.jpg&hash=a4b4d823c040cbd43c427fb8ca0b30396fc8f530)

Umbrella vs Ingen: Get ready to rumble :laugh: :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 19, 2012, 12:49:57 PM
No.
Just, just. No.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SuperM on Feb 19, 2012, 02:46:27 PM
Quote from: r888 on Feb 19, 2012, 05:29:55 AM
f**k YEAH

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc04.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2Ff%2F2010%2F330%2F5%2Fa%2Fjp_pteranodon_with_plagas_by_hellraptor-d33mfte.jpg&hash=a4b4d823c040cbd43c427fb8ca0b30396fc8f530)

that is one hell of an anus
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Feb 19, 2012, 06:07:41 PM
>pteranodon with teeth

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fm.chanarchive.org%2Fcontent%2F22_k%2F10271383%2F1323475568198.jpg&hash=35cc1134dfae4f3a1ad234cdcb5a38914fbc4079)

The whole design is fugly too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 19, 2012, 06:11:32 PM
+1 for Charlton Heston.

In all honesty, though, I like the JPIII Pteranodons. They're basically the TLW Pteranodon with a different color scheme and teeth. I wonder how and why the teeth managed to get past thoughts (???).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on Feb 19, 2012, 06:52:48 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 19, 2012, 06:11:32 PM
+1 for Charlton Heston.

In all honesty, though, I like the JPIII Pteranodons. They're basically the TLW Pteranodon with a different color scheme and teeth. I wonder how and why the teeth managed to get past thoughts (???).

They thought no one would notice? Or just ignoring real life and following the rule of cool. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 19, 2012, 06:58:25 PM
Yeah, it always was beyond me. In the second film they got a fantastic Pteranodon design, and in the third they somehow add teeth. With Horner as a consultant mind you, I understand he's not an expert in everything but damn, I know Pteranodon means Wings without teeth!
Buh. Perhaps it was an homage to old Dinosaur movies with toothed Pterosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Feb 19, 2012, 07:11:46 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 19, 2012, 06:58:25 PM
Yeah, it always was beyond me. In the second film they got a fantastic Pteranodon design, and in the third they somehow add teeth. With Horner as a consultant mind you, I understand he's not an expert in everything but damn, I know Pteranodon means Wings without teeth!
Buh. Perhaps it was an homage to old Dinosaur movies with toothed Pterosaurs.

When they go and change the design of the Raptor so drastically from what we had seen in the first two films just to be more "accurate" adding things like razor teeth to a Pteranodon is just f**king stupid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 19, 2012, 07:18:25 PM
Oh yeah, that's also a very contradicting aspect. They accurate-ized the Raptors but they de-accurate-ize the Pteranodons. It's weird to say the least.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Feb 19, 2012, 08:15:26 PM
Most likely just to give them a more intimidating or scary appearance. Which is hilarious irony considering the downgraded 'for the sake of accuracy' raptors that nobody wanted to see. Pssht, why not make them 2.5 feet tall why you're at it. f**k Horner.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 19, 2012, 08:19:40 PM
Quote from: SuperM on Feb 19, 2012, 02:46:27 PM
Quote from: r888 on Feb 19, 2012, 05:29:55 AM
f**k YEAH

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc04.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2Ff%2F2010%2F330%2F5%2Fa%2Fjp_pteranodon_with_plagas_by_hellraptor-d33mfte.jpg&hash=a4b4d823c040cbd43c427fb8ca0b30396fc8f530)

that is one hell of an anus

:D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 19, 2012, 09:33:18 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Feb 19, 2012, 08:15:26 PM
Most likely just to give them a more intimidating or scary appearance.
Ironically enough, the most imposing and creepy shot of a Pteranodon in the third film is, I reckon, the one we see when one of them turns towards Alan and Paul, along with the first introducing shot in the mist.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on Feb 19, 2012, 09:57:32 PM
All this talk of Pteranodons with teeth just reminded me how even when the movie came out and I was 6 I kept thinking to myself: "Pteranodons with teeth..."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37OWL7AzvHo# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37OWL7AzvHo#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 19, 2012, 10:34:31 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 19, 2012, 06:58:25 PM
Yeah, it always was beyond me. In the second film they got a fantastic Pteranodon design, and in the third they somehow add teeth. With Horner as a consultant mind you, I understand he's not an expert in everything but damn, I know Pteranodon means Wings without teeth!
Buh. Perhaps it was an homage to old Dinosaur movies with toothed Pterosaurs.

...it's only a movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 19, 2012, 10:42:43 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 19, 2012, 09:33:18 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Feb 19, 2012, 08:15:26 PM
Most likely just to give them a more intimidating or scary appearance.
Ironically enough, the most imposing and creepy shot of a Pteranodon in the third film is, I reckon, the one we see when one of them turns towards Alan and Paul.

That shot was such a surprise whe I first saw the movie in theaters.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iea5Bw1ys1Q#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iea5Bw1ys1Q#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: stephen on Feb 20, 2012, 12:24:24 AM
That was actually an awesome shot.  Though it is sped up in that clip there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 20, 2012, 05:09:39 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 19, 2012, 10:34:31 PM
...it's only a movie.
Yes, and...?
It's just contradicting their intentions.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 21, 2012, 06:39:55 PM
Well if we're arguing with most logic that fans use in debating why the JP and TLW Velociraptors had no feathers whereas the JP III ones did, it could be that those Pteros were either of a different species entirely or they were a special breed from inGen's labs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 21, 2012, 06:49:48 PM
I am not arguing that at all. What I am saying is that they changed the Raptors to make them more accurate to the most recent theories -- and do the exact opposite with the Pteranodons. That's the weird thing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on Feb 21, 2012, 09:08:23 PM
Well, in true JP canon - and I've probably stated this over and over - The Raptor have two breeds, Nublarensis and Sornaensis, which both species are found on Isla Sorna, whereas only Nublarensis were found on Nublar. The Nublar bred raptors were more rabid, less intelligent.

Hence, why they would fight each other over the human morsels.


But the Raptors introduced in JPIII were an entirely new breed made by InGen, a more accurate breed up to modern standards, which included heightened intelligence, communication, and pack behavior.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Feb 21, 2012, 09:09:11 PM
Where does this info come from?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Basher917 on Feb 21, 2012, 09:19:58 PM
Quote from: Laufey on Feb 21, 2012, 09:09:11 PM
Where does this info come from?

That's the internet for you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on Feb 21, 2012, 09:25:41 PM
http://www.jplegacy.org/board/showthread.php?t=20557 (http://www.jplegacy.org/board/showthread.php?t=20557)

Disproving JP "Raptor evolution" theory

http://www.jplegacy.org/jpencyclopedia/?p=101 (http://www.jplegacy.org/jpencyclopedia/?p=101)
Both Nublarensis and Sornaensis
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Le Celticant on Feb 21, 2012, 09:32:06 PM
You can be as "accurate" as you want, if a theory say the earth is cubic, it's for sure better than plate, but it is still a billion miles away from what the truth is.
This is why there is: fiction.  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on Feb 21, 2012, 09:34:11 PM
Spielberg/Film canon is what all these sources stem from.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 21, 2012, 09:38:28 PM
The Sornaensis and Nublarensis talk is not official canon by any standard. It's fan speculation, unless a future film takes inspiration from it and adds it to the real film canon. Until this hypothetical event, it remains fan speculation.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Feb 21, 2012, 09:43:39 PM
Thanks for clearing this up, Omgea. I didn't remember anything from either the movies or the books about the Raptors being different breeds.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on Feb 21, 2012, 09:51:29 PM
The encyclopedia has the information listed under S/F canon, and I would barely question JPL Research and staff members.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 21, 2012, 09:54:23 PM
It is undoubtely the fruit of a lot of research, and is well written (I love JPLegacy, I am a member here), but do we ever hear the terms Sornaensis/Nublarensis used in the movies? No. Ergo: fan speculation. Nothing less or more - go figure labeling it as official canon. You cannot, because it isn't.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 21, 2012, 10:10:55 PM
Sounds a lot like canon surrounding the A/P EU...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: genocyber on Feb 22, 2012, 12:06:45 AM
What is there to tell for a Jurassic Park? They arent going to build another park. They tried to do that in the second movie and it fell apart. Third movie was just them wandering around the island minus a park. It'd be really stupid if the fourth movie just became another science fiction about test tube mad science dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Feb 22, 2012, 12:40:13 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 21, 2012, 09:54:23 PM
It is undoubtely the fruit of a lot of research, and is well written (I love JPLegacy, I am a member here), but do we ever hear the terms Sornaensis/Nublarensis used in the movies? No. Ergo: fan speculation. Nothing less or more - go figure labeling it as official canon. You cannot, because it isn't.
Mah nigga! You're like Alan Grant at that Q&A.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Crazy Rich on Feb 22, 2012, 12:56:21 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 21, 2012, 09:54:23 PM
It is undoubtely the fruit of a lot of research, and is well written (I love JPLegacy, I am a member here), but do we ever hear the terms Sornaensis/Nublarensis used in the movies? No. Ergo: fan speculation. Nothing less or more - go figure labeling it as official canon. You cannot, because it isn't.
I love you man.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Feb 22, 2012, 01:01:10 AM
That one is going on Omega Slays: The Greatest Hits.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 22, 2012, 01:19:06 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Feb 22, 2012, 01:01:10 AM
That one is going on Omega Slays: The Greatest Hits.

I would so buy that album.

I mean, just think about it. OmegaZilla giving Carl Sagan-esque speeches on dinosaurs. Brilliant!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 22, 2012, 03:09:08 AM
Quote from: genocyber on Feb 22, 2012, 12:06:45 AM
What is there to tell for a Jurassic Park? They arent going to build another park. They tried to do that in the second movie and it fell apart. Third movie was just them wandering around the island minus a park. It'd be really stupid if the fourth movie just became another science fiction about test tube mad science dinosaurs.

Like Malcom said in the second film, in case you missed it: "They're not building anything, there taking these animals outta here."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 22, 2012, 03:37:20 AM
But that was in reference to the San Diego project. Where can the story go, that's fresh?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MudButt on Feb 22, 2012, 03:41:11 AM
I honestly can't think of anything fresh, other then them discovering a secret park/lab/island that Hammond, or InGen kept hidden from the public should anything go bad. However even that idea isn't exactly the most original. I'd hate for the "going back to the island" plot to return because it's been done enough. Unless it's soldiers, or mercenaries, that way I can see my dream scene of Raptors taking out some commandos  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: genocyber on Feb 22, 2012, 03:43:23 AM
In order for it to be good it has to be a legitimate reason to go back to the first movies roots.
The Plesiosaurs would make for a good new focus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 22, 2012, 04:09:00 AM
I once heard that the fourth film would involve Malcolm going back with a party with the intent of actually destroying the island for good. How's that for fresh?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 22, 2012, 04:15:18 AM
Don't really like it. He only went to the second island to get Sarah out of there. It would seem against his character to go back to the island as some crusader trying to destroy it. Don't see him getting involved again, unless it effects him personally. That's the thing about both Grant from JP III and Malcolm from TLW, they went there only for their own selfish reasons (money for Grant) and (Sarah for Malcolm) so again, unless it effects both characters personally – like if they gave Malcolm a large check for going back, then it might make sense.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Feb 22, 2012, 04:18:26 AM
inb4 thare's some ducktor asshawl thet wus layd off frum inGen n threttning 2 releese nat INFO TO WIKI LEAKS... BUT DINOSOURS 2 THE MAINLENT, SO DACTER GRUNT ANT EEN MALECUM HAVE 2 JOIN TEH SOS ANT SOCUM ANT MBLA 2 INCERSEPT TEH PAYLOAT IN TEH PASIFIC OHSHIN B4 THEY GET 2 TEH MAINLENT, THUS INISHYATING A BATOL @ SEE!!!!!!!

lol jajajaja XDD
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 22, 2012, 04:20:39 AM
I wanna run with that, just for the sheer heck of it.

Poachers; poachers flock to the island, conservationist team(s) consisting of the original JP cast go in to stop them. I know it sounds like TLW but rather than having the animals lifted from the island, they are killed on the spot and just hacked up. Too Lost World-y?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 22, 2012, 04:22:52 AM
I would personally want something about Biosyn. The rival company of InGen. The company Dodgson was from.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Feb 22, 2012, 04:28:06 AM
hold on, that pissed off doctor isn't that bad of an idea.

what if you have people growing illegal dinosaurs everywhere and they start getting lose, contaminate and destroy wildlife, and become a big problem to countries of the tropic? it is not a silly concept at all. and im not talking the big ones, but compis, raptors, and all those that are way too small to catch them all. now that's a big threat.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Feb 22, 2012, 04:32:29 AM
Yeah, I was writing it all retarded and I realized that the laid off employee thing stirring shit up somehow wasn't all that bad of an idea.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Feb 22, 2012, 04:32:48 AM
Ok, I'll bite. But someone had to be in charge of the embryo vials. There had to be much more then the one cannistar featured in the first film. It would only seem natural to grab those embryos before the company folded on itself.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 22, 2012, 04:34:21 AM
I could go for the BioSyn idea. Makes sense since we know nothing about them, unless you've read the books.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Feb 22, 2012, 06:06:50 AM
Honestly, I liked the idea of Isla Sorna being destroyed at first. Then I realized that it would go against everything the first film stood for. "Life finds a way." If it were to be destroyed, the series would be a hypocrite.

The BioSyn idea could work, but we've got to remember that everyone in the world knows about Isla Sorna now. It's famous. It's probably just another part of every day life. There could even be shows on NatGeo. That's what I think the film should portray. Scientists have to be constantly heading to the island to research the animals. That sounds like a good start for a story to me. A group of researchers go to study the animals, and then hell breaks loose.

But I think the 'hell breaks loose' part of the Jurassic Park franchise has always been tricky. In the first film, it was Nedry turning the security fences off. In TLW, it was the destruction of Ludlow's camp. In JP3, it was a spinosaurus running into an airplane. I think that there has to be a good reason for 'all hell to break loose.' I shouldn't be too direct, and they shouldn't suddenly be stranded. Something a little more slow, where they think their okay, and then it just keeps getting worse. That would be a better element. Sort of like the first and second film. It wasn't like that in JP3. Their plane crashed, and then suddenly they were being chased by dinosaurs.

But what exactly could go wrong? I really hope it wouldn't just be a dinosaur crashing into their camp. I think it should be the fault of the humans. I personally like the idea of poachers on the island. I mean, poachers, although it seems sort of an unoriginal idea, are realistic. If there was an island full of dinosaurs, there would be people willing to steal them and sell them on the black market. So I don't think the idea is too far off.

So, that's what I think the film could easily be about. It may not be the most epic story, but it isn't a re-ash of everything else or something completely new.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on Feb 22, 2012, 12:43:52 PM
Research team = Hammond's team from TLW, atleast 'officially'



Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 22, 2012, 06:56:06 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Feb 22, 2012, 12:40:13 AM
You're like Alan Grant at that Q&A.  :laugh:
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi39.tinypic.com%2F2wowr5d.jpg&hash=52ea632e20d42f45f875ab6d026292d065915d6e)
What those researchers did with the Sornaensis/Nublarensis theory, is create entirely speculative fan theories. Nothing more, and nothing less.

Quote from: Space Sweeper on Feb 22, 2012, 01:01:10 AM
That one is going on Omega Slays: The Greatest Hits.
Produced by Space Sweeper Records!


Also no Sorna getting nuked what-so-ever.
No one will ruin the closing shot of The Lost World.
No f**king one.

Or there will be murder.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Feb 22, 2012, 07:09:58 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 22, 2012, 06:56:06 PM
Also no Sorna getting nuked what-so-ever.
No one will ruin the closing shot of The Lost World.
No f**king one.

Or there will be murder.
MAH MAN!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 22, 2012, 07:25:00 PM
What was I missing here!?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Feb 22, 2012, 07:29:43 PM
Omega slayin' shit.

So nothing new.  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 22, 2012, 07:41:39 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Feb 22, 2012, 07:29:43 PM
Omega slayin' shit.

So nothing new.  8)

Oh.  Okay.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Feb 23, 2012, 02:07:19 AM
Quote from: Gate on Feb 22, 2012, 12:43:52 PM
Research team = Hammond's team from TLW, atleast 'officially'
That's a good point, but I think I'm thinking more of actual scientists, doing more specific studies there than documenting the animals.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on Feb 23, 2012, 09:12:53 PM
I'd also like to point out that you said Isla Sorna is destroyed. It's isla Nublar, the Jurassic Park site, that was napalmed. Not Site B
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 23, 2012, 09:44:34 PM
(Which is helped at by a lot of things in the theatrical cuts of TLW and JPIII, but since the scene in TLW was cut I don't personally think it happened. JP finale and all you know.)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenomrph on Feb 23, 2012, 10:47:44 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Feb 22, 2012, 04:22:52 AM
I would personally want something about Biosyn. The rival company of InGen. The company Dodgson was from.
Howsabout this for an idea:

post 'The Lost World' (1997), Ingen folds completely. All their stuff is up for auction and Biosyn gets all of it. All their research data, all their equipment... and Isla Nublar.
They scout the island, and come to the conclusion that the only reason the park failed the first time was because of human error - if Nedry hadn't been a dumbass, the park would have been fine. So they get a crazy idea: rebuild the park, open it to the public.

Fast-forward to 2013, and the park is open and has been for about a year, and it's a huge success. People love it, Biosyn is raking in money hand-over-fist, but they're also doing some not-so-ethical stuff on the side. Chemical testing on dinosaurs, etc. Want to hunt a stegosaurus? Pony up the $2million and you can do it. Technically they can get away with it because the animals are constructs and legal property of Biosyn, but that doesn't mean everyone has to like it.
So an animal rights group tries to subtly sabotage the park. Nothing huge, just make the park such a hassle to run that it's not profitable anymore and gets shut down.

Their plans get out of hand (chaos theory in action) and all hell breaks loose. But now instead of dinosaurs loose on an island with 8 people or so, you've got hundreds. Tourists, staff, etc.

It would have a lot of elements that made the original so popular, plus a lot of new stuff people have never seen (a fully-functioning Jurassic Park, for example). The tone would be similar to the first movie, but also different because the danger is on a much bigger scale - tons of people trapped on the island and panicking, rather than just a handful. Crowd control would be much more difficult - when you've got hundreds of people rioting, they're almost as much of a danger to themselves as the dinos on the loose would be.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Novak 1334 on Feb 23, 2012, 11:19:38 PM
Something exploring the original Island's creation maybe?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 24, 2012, 02:23:00 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Feb 23, 2012, 10:47:44 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Feb 22, 2012, 04:22:52 AM
I would personally want something about Biosyn. The rival company of InGen. The company Dodgson was from.
Howsabout this for an idea:

post 'The Lost World' (1997), Ingen folds completely. All their stuff is up for auction and Biosyn gets all of it. All their research data, all their equipment... and Isla Nublar.
They scout the island, and come to the conclusion that the only reason the park failed the first time was because of human error - if Nedry hadn't been a dumbass, the park would have been fine. So they get a crazy idea: rebuild the park, open it to the public.

Fast-forward to 2013, and the park is open and has been for about a year, and it's a huge success. People love it, Biosyn is raking in money hand-over-fist, but they're also doing some not-so-ethical stuff on the side. Chemical testing on dinosaurs, etc. Want to hunt a stegosaurus? Pony up the $2million and you can do it. Technically they can get away with it because the animals are constructs and legal property of Biosyn, but that doesn't mean everyone has to like it.
So an animal rights group tries to subtly sabotage the park. Nothing huge, just make the park such a hassle to run that it's not profitable anymore and gets shut down.

Their plans get out of hand (chaos theory in action) and all hell breaks loose. But now instead of dinosaurs loose on an island with 8 people or so, you've got hundreds. Tourists, staff, etc.

It would have a lot of elements that made the original so popular, plus a lot of new stuff people have never seen (a fully-functioning Jurassic Park, for example). The tone would be similar to the first movie, but also different because the danger is on a much bigger scale - tons of people trapped on the island and panicking, rather than just a handful. Crowd control would be much more difficult - when you've got hundreds of people rioting, they're almost as much of a danger to themselves as the dinos on the loose would be.

Pretty interesting concept, however, I couldn't get AVP-R out of my head when I was reading that.  I think human interaction with dinos on a large scale may degrade the quality of the film some how.  Unless they handle it like they did with The Lost World. 

I don't know.  I like the idea, but then I don't like it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Kol on Feb 24, 2012, 04:08:17 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 24, 2012, 02:23:00 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Feb 23, 2012, 10:47:44 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Feb 22, 2012, 04:22:52 AM
I would personally want something about Biosyn. The rival company of InGen. The company Dodgson was from.
Howsabout this for an idea:

post 'The Lost World' (1997), Ingen folds completely. All their stuff is up for auction and Biosyn gets all of it. All their research data, all their equipment... and Isla Nublar.
They scout the island, and come to the conclusion that the only reason the park failed the first time was because of human error - if Nedry hadn't been a dumbass, the park would have been fine. So they get a crazy idea: rebuild the park, open it to the public.

Fast-forward to 2013, and the park is open and has been for about a year, and it's a huge success. People love it, Biosyn is raking in money hand-over-fist, but they're also doing some not-so-ethical stuff on the side. Chemical testing on dinosaurs, etc. Want to hunt a stegosaurus? Pony up the $2million and you can do it. Technically they can get away with it because the animals are constructs and legal property of Biosyn, but that doesn't mean everyone has to like it.
So an animal rights group tries to subtly sabotage the park. Nothing huge, just make the park such a hassle to run that it's not profitable anymore and gets shut down.

Their plans get out of hand (chaos theory in action) and all hell breaks loose. But now instead of dinosaurs loose on an island with 8 people or so, you've got hundreds. Tourists, staff, etc.

It would have a lot of elements that made the original so popular, plus a lot of new stuff people have never seen (a fully-functioning Jurassic Park, for example). The tone would be similar to the first movie, but also different because the danger is on a much bigger scale - tons of people trapped on the island and panicking, rather than just a handful. Crowd control would be much more difficult - when you've got hundreds of people rioting, they're almost as much of a danger to themselves as the dinos on the loose would be.

Pretty interesting concept, however, I couldn't get AVP-R out of my head when I was reading that.  I think human interaction with dinos on a large scale may degrade the quality of the film some how.  Unless they handle it like they did with The Lost World. 

I don't know.  I like the idea, but then I don't like it.

imagine a JP videogame w/dead island engine but DINOSAURS instead of zombies and xenomrph's story combined = superb game!  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 24, 2012, 04:14:39 AM
Honestly - no word of a lie - a total reboot based 100% on the book wouldn't upset me. I would definitely pay for that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenomrph on Feb 24, 2012, 04:35:13 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 24, 2012, 02:23:00 AM
Pretty interesting concept, however, I couldn't get AVP-R out of my head when I was reading that.  I think human interaction with dinos on a large scale may degrade the quality of the film some how.  Unless they handle it like they did with The Lost World. 

I don't know.  I like the idea, but then I don't like it.
Well I'm not saying have a body count just to have a body count, just that having a huge crowd of people would increase that risk factor, and also the mob mentality of the survivors would force the characters to make different choices, perhaps choose sides. What happens when the mob learns that they're trapped on the island due to sabotage? How quickly would it turn into a lynching party?
Think of it less like AvPR and more like 'The Mist' on a larger scale.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 24, 2012, 04:37:44 AM
I like your idea. Let's bring in some dinosaurs too while we're at it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenomrph on Feb 24, 2012, 04:57:38 AM
what do you mean?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Feb 24, 2012, 06:04:35 AM
Quote from: Gate on Feb 23, 2012, 09:12:53 PM
I'd also like to point out that you said Isla Sorna is destroyed. It's isla Nublar, the Jurassic Park site, that was napalmed. Not Site B
I meant for the possible JP4 concepts. There were people who were discussing the idea of them going back to the island to destroy it, and my post was in response to that ;)

Quote from: Xenomrph on Feb 23, 2012, 10:47:44 PM
Howsabout this for an idea:

post 'The Lost World' (1997), Ingen folds completely. All their stuff is up for auction and Biosyn gets all of it. All their research data, all their equipment... and Isla Nublar.
They scout the island, and come to the conclusion that the only reason the park failed the first time was because of human error - if Nedry hadn't been a dumbass, the park would have been fine. So they get a crazy idea: rebuild the park, open it to the public.

Fast-forward to 2013, and the park is open and has been for about a year, and it's a huge success. People love it, Biosyn is raking in money hand-over-fist, but they're also doing some not-so-ethical stuff on the side. Chemical testing on dinosaurs, etc. Want to hunt a stegosaurus? Pony up the $2million and you can do it. Technically they can get away with it because the animals are constructs and legal property of Biosyn, but that doesn't mean everyone has to like it.
So an animal rights group tries to subtly sabotage the park. Nothing huge, just make the park such a hassle to run that it's not profitable anymore and gets shut down.

Their plans get out of hand (chaos theory in action) and all hell breaks loose. But now instead of dinosaurs loose on an island with 8 people or so, you've got hundreds. Tourists, staff, etc.

It would have a lot of elements that made the original so popular, plus a lot of new stuff people have never seen (a fully-functioning Jurassic Park, for example). The tone would be similar to the first movie, but also different because the danger is on a much bigger scale - tons of people trapped on the island and panicking, rather than just a handful. Crowd control would be much more difficult - when you've got hundreds of people rioting, they're almost as much of a danger to themselves as the dinos on the loose would be.
I don't mind the idea about BioSyn taking control of InGen...but another park? It's been attempted twice. No way in hell are they ever going to try to rebuild Jurassic Park as a theme park. Perhaps something more natural preserve like, and much more heavily restricted. Possibly on open for scientists to study. The idea of rebuilding the park is too unrealistic, in my opinion.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Kol on Feb 24, 2012, 11:14:34 AM
Quote from: evolution_rex on Feb 24, 2012, 06:04:35 AM
Quote from: Gate on Feb 23, 2012, 09:12:53 PM
I'd also like to point out that you said Isla Sorna is destroyed. It's isla Nublar, the Jurassic Park site, that was napalmed. Not Site B
I meant for the possible JP4 concepts. There were people who were discussing the idea of them going back to the island to destroy it, and my post was in response to that ;)

Quote from: Xenomrph on Feb 23, 2012, 10:47:44 PM
Howsabout this for an idea:

post 'The Lost World' (1997), Ingen folds completely. All their stuff is up for auction and Biosyn gets all of it. All their research data, all their equipment... and Isla Nublar.
They scout the island, and come to the conclusion that the only reason the park failed the first time was because of human error - if Nedry hadn't been a dumbass, the park would have been fine. So they get a crazy idea: rebuild the park, open it to the public.

Fast-forward to 2013, and the park is open and has been for about a year, and it's a huge success. People love it, Biosyn is raking in money hand-over-fist, but they're also doing some not-so-ethical stuff on the side. Chemical testing on dinosaurs, etc. Want to hunt a stegosaurus? Pony up the $2million and you can do it. Technically they can get away with it because the animals are constructs and legal property of Biosyn, but that doesn't mean everyone has to like it.
So an animal rights group tries to subtly sabotage the park. Nothing huge, just make the park such a hassle to run that it's not profitable anymore and gets shut down.

Their plans get out of hand (chaos theory in action) and all hell breaks loose. But now instead of dinosaurs loose on an island with 8 people or so, you've got hundreds. Tourists, staff, etc.

It would have a lot of elements that made the original so popular, plus a lot of new stuff people have never seen (a fully-functioning Jurassic Park, for example). The tone would be similar to the first movie, but also different because the danger is on a much bigger scale - tons of people trapped on the island and panicking, rather than just a handful. Crowd control would be much more difficult - when you've got hundreds of people rioting, they're almost as much of a danger to themselves as the dinos on the loose would be.
I don't mind the idea about BioSyn taking control of InGen...but another park? It's been attempted twice. No way in hell are they ever going to try to rebuild Jurassic Park as a theme park. Perhaps something more natural preserve like, and much more heavily restricted. Possibly on open for scientists to study. The idea of rebuilding the park is too unrealistic, in my opinion.

a dinosaur preserve, for studies? by biosyn?  ???
excuse me, but for a profit-oriented company it's senseless to make a risk operation, finding those embryos only to make it into a preserve. makes no sense to me.
and as he said. we've never saw the park "in action".

xenomrphs idea is the best i read so far (except for my own prequel thoughts). and if it wouldn't make it in any JP movie, i wouldn't mind to see this structure-idea being recycled in a video game.  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenomrph on Feb 24, 2012, 11:55:00 AM
Quote from: evolution_rex on Feb 24, 2012, 06:04:35 AM
I don't mind the idea about BioSyn taking control of InGen...but another park? It's been attempted twice. No way in hell are they ever going to try to rebuild Jurassic Park as a theme park. Perhaps something more natural preserve like, and much more heavily restricted. Possibly on open for scientists to study. The idea of rebuilding the park is too unrealistic, in my opinion.
The thing is, both times it was attempted it didn't work because of human error. The first time was because Nedry was an idiot, the second time was because Sarah Harding and co. sabotaged the crap out of the Ingen camp and set all the dinosaurs loose. There isn't actually anything inherently flawed with a dinosaur theme park, things get dangerous when people mess up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 24, 2012, 01:21:33 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Feb 24, 2012, 04:57:38 AM
what do you mean?

Just that. I would like new dinosaurs seen on-screen like I've been saying for the past four years just to mix things up a little and I would also like to see more Dilophosaurus action.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 24, 2012, 03:38:46 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 24, 2012, 01:21:33 PM
I would also like to see more Dilophosaurus action.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fglpiggy.files.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F02%2Fjp-dilophosaurus2.jpg&hash=d5c60dd6328942b82d51a72656dd0df9809d72eb)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenomrph on Feb 24, 2012, 05:26:44 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 24, 2012, 01:21:33 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Feb 24, 2012, 04:57:38 AM
what do you mean?

Just that. I would like new dinosaurs seen on-screen like I've been saying for the past four years just to mix things up a little and I would also like to see more Dilophosaurus action.
Oh, well yeah. I'd love to see the chameleon Carnotaurus from The Lost World book make an appearance at the very least.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 24, 2012, 05:57:50 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Feb 24, 2012, 05:26:44 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 24, 2012, 01:21:33 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Feb 24, 2012, 04:57:38 AM
what do you mean?

Just that. I would like new dinosaurs seen on-screen like I've been saying for the past four years just to mix things up a little and I would also like to see more Dilophosaurus action.
Oh, well yeah. I'd love to see the chameleon Carnotaurus from The Lost World book make an appearance at the very least.

Hows' about an archaeopteryx?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F24.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_lksorgS8fQ1qhp1q0o1_400.jpg&hash=3ce7cafa67814469172bfe5554a170e98be41182)

Jurassic Park 4: Evolution Restarts
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Feb 25, 2012, 05:17:44 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Feb 24, 2012, 11:55:00 AM
Quote from: evolution_rex on Feb 24, 2012, 06:04:35 AM
I don't mind the idea about BioSyn taking control of InGen...but another park? It's been attempted twice. No way in hell are they ever going to try to rebuild Jurassic Park as a theme park. Perhaps something more natural preserve like, and much more heavily restricted. Possibly on open for scientists to study. The idea of rebuilding the park is too unrealistic, in my opinion.
The thing is, both times it was attempted it didn't work because of human error. The first time was because Nedry was an idiot, the second time was because Sarah Harding and co. sabotaged the crap out of the Ingen camp and set all the dinosaurs loose. There isn't actually anything inherently flawed with a dinosaur theme park, things get dangerous when people mess up.
It doesn't matter, really. The public won't want another park, no way in hell would any one invest into it, and the government might not even allow it. There just isn't a good enough reason to rebuild the park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 25, 2012, 05:23:15 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Feb 24, 2012, 11:55:00 AM
Quote from: evolution_rex on Feb 24, 2012, 06:04:35 AM
I don't mind the idea about BioSyn taking control of InGen...but another park? It's been attempted twice. No way in hell are they ever going to try to rebuild Jurassic Park as a theme park. Perhaps something more natural preserve like, and much more heavily restricted. Possibly on open for scientists to study. The idea of rebuilding the park is too unrealistic, in my opinion.
The thing is, both times it was attempted it didn't work because of human error. The first time was because Nedry was an idiot, the second time was because Sarah Harding and co. sabotaged the crap out of the Ingen camp and set all the dinosaurs loose. There isn't actually anything inherently flawed with a dinosaur theme park, things get dangerous when people mess up.

Yes there is. There are plenty of things wrong with it. Ian Malcom spends a whole chapter outlining those problems in the book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenomrph on Feb 25, 2012, 08:01:28 AM
Quote from: evolution_rex on Feb 25, 2012, 05:17:44 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Feb 24, 2012, 11:55:00 AM
Quote from: evolution_rex on Feb 24, 2012, 06:04:35 AM
I don't mind the idea about BioSyn taking control of InGen...but another park? It's been attempted twice. No way in hell are they ever going to try to rebuild Jurassic Park as a theme park. Perhaps something more natural preserve like, and much more heavily restricted. Possibly on open for scientists to study. The idea of rebuilding the park is too unrealistic, in my opinion.
The thing is, both times it was attempted it didn't work because of human error. The first time was because Nedry was an idiot, the second time was because Sarah Harding and co. sabotaged the crap out of the Ingen camp and set all the dinosaurs loose. There isn't actually anything inherently flawed with a dinosaur theme park, things get dangerous when people mess up.
It doesn't matter, really. The public won't want another park, no way in hell would any one invest into it, and the government might not even allow it. There just isn't a good enough reason to rebuild the park.
Sure they would, the public would pay crazy money to see real-life dinosaurs up close. There's an excellent reason to rebuild the park: $$$$$$$$$$$$

Did you ever play the "Jurassic Park: Operation Genesis" video game? The entire premise of the game is "prove the first movie wrong" and make a successful park.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 25, 2012, 05:23:15 AM
Yes there is. There are plenty of things wrong with it. Ian Malcom spends a whole chapter outlining those problems in the book.
Yeah and none of them happened in the movie. Dinosaurs breeding? That's easy to control once you realize it's happening. It's an island, with the dinosaurs in pens. :P
If a dinosaur theme park was inherently flawed, those same flaws would make zoos impossible to maintain - and yet we have zoos all over the world, housing any number of different animals.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 25, 2012, 03:20:38 PM
Except dinosaurs existed in a physical environment that was far different to ours. You can't use modern zoos as an example. The three best pieces of proof I can provide are:

1. There was more CO2 in the air during the Mesozoic. Why do you think dinosaurs grew so large? The air allowed them to grow as big as they did. Unless a park owner plans on building structures that are 500 feet tall and several miles across and re-create that atmosphere, he's not going to be able to sustain large animals.

2. The type of plant life that existed during the Mesozoic wasn't the same as it is today. Dinosaurs' teeth evolved to eat specific types of plants that they could not only chew, according to their teeth shape, but also digest. It's not as simple as just eating any plant they see purely because they are herbivores.

3. Large dinosaurs require heavy amounts of food, and I do mean heavy. A large carnivore like T.Rex would need at the very minimum, 60 kg of meat everyday just to survive. Ok, read that again. We're not talking about actually satisfying its appetite in which case where the heck is someone going to find that much food to feed it? And let's not even talk about the sauropods like Brachiosaurus. In addition to increased CO2 in the atmosphere, they grew so large because they spent their entire lives eating and being very good at it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 25, 2012, 03:23:18 PM
Not to mention that if a lion runs loose in a city, it's one thing. If a Tyrannosaurus runs loose in said city -- it's a whole another thing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 25, 2012, 03:24:37 PM
Yeah, you get property damage galore and even deaths like we saw in TLW. Try selling that to an investor.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Feb 25, 2012, 04:39:41 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Feb 25, 2012, 08:01:28 AM
Quote from: evolution_rex on Feb 25, 2012, 05:17:44 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Feb 24, 2012, 11:55:00 AM
Quote from: evolution_rex on Feb 24, 2012, 06:04:35 AM
I don't mind the idea about BioSyn taking control of InGen...but another park? It's been attempted twice. No way in hell are they ever going to try to rebuild Jurassic Park as a theme park. Perhaps something more natural preserve like, and much more heavily restricted. Possibly on open for scientists to study. The idea of rebuilding the park is too unrealistic, in my opinion.
The thing is, both times it was attempted it didn't work because of human error. The first time was because Nedry was an idiot, the second time was because Sarah Harding and co. sabotaged the crap out of the Ingen camp and set all the dinosaurs loose. There isn't actually anything inherently flawed with a dinosaur theme park, things get dangerous when people mess up.
It doesn't matter, really. The public won't want another park, no way in hell would any one invest into it, and the government might not even allow it. There just isn't a good enough reason to rebuild the park.
Sure they would, the public would pay crazy money to see real-life dinosaurs up close. There's an excellent reason to rebuild the park: $$$$$$$$$$$$

Did you ever play the "Jurassic Park: Operation Genesis" video game? The entire premise of the game is "prove the first movie wrong" and make a successful park.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 25, 2012, 05:23:15 AM
Yes there is. There are plenty of things wrong with it. Ian Malcom spends a whole chapter outlining those problems in the book.
Yeah and none of them happened in the movie. Dinosaurs breeding? That's easy to control once you realize it's happening. It's an island, with the dinosaurs in pens. :P
If a dinosaur theme park was inherently flawed, those same flaws would make zoos impossible to maintain - and yet we have zoos all over the world, housing any number of different animals.

Its a little funny, because the arguments you are making are pretty much the same ones made my Hammond and Co. in the book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenomrph on Feb 25, 2012, 06:14:58 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 25, 2012, 03:23:18 PM
Not to mention that if a lion runs loose in a city, it's one thing. If a Tyrannosaurus runs loose in said city -- it's a whole another thing.
That's okay, because it's happening on an island, where there's pens.

According to the movies, the only problem with the park was human error. With the books that's a different story, but my movie idea follows from the movies (which I don't feel explored the "chaos theory" angle as deeply as the book did).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 25, 2012, 07:29:41 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Feb 25, 2012, 06:14:58 PM
That's okay, because it's happening on an island, where there's pens.
A lion cannot cause as much damage as a Tyrannosaurus -- not only to people but also to structures. A Tyrannosaurus getting free for mistake would not only likely injure -or kill- visitors, but would also destroy some park structures.

Not to mention the fences could be easily disabled by a completely unintentional accident, or even a storm. There's a lot of variants.

In JPOG they partially solved this problem by introducing these bunker things, which I think are actually a good idea.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Feb 25, 2012, 07:51:46 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Feb 25, 2012, 06:14:58 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 25, 2012, 03:23:18 PM
Not to mention that if a lion runs loose in a city, it's one thing. If a Tyrannosaurus runs loose in said city -- it's a whole another thing.
That's okay, because it's happening on an island, where there's pens.

According to the movies, the only problem with the park was human error. With the books that's a different story, but my movie idea follows from the movies (which I don't feel explored the "chaos theory" angle as deeply as the book did).

According the the movies it wasn't only human error but human sabotage.

Nedry's greed and his turning off the power to the fences in order to get the embryos to the boat.

But aside from that ... the Raptors were already out ... and for God knows how long and laying eggs in the wild (long enough to have them hatching). Which never made sense to me since there were no incidents or evidence of unaccounted for, or extra raptors running about within the pens of the other animals. So that's a pretty big problem without factoring in Nedry, and would fall squarely into Malcom's chaos theory.

And nothing is explored as deeply in the film. As classic and wonderful as the film is, they didn't spend the time to mold it into a meticulously believable science fiction film. It's a great A pop-corn flick that renders the science and accompanying theories to quick scenes of exposition so we can hurry up and get to the mayhem.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Feb 25, 2012, 07:59:05 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Feb 25, 2012, 08:01:28 AM
Sure they would, the public would pay crazy money to see real-life dinosaurs up close. There's an excellent reason to rebuild the park: $$$$$$$$$$$$

Did you ever play the "Jurassic Park: Operation Genesis" video game? The entire premise of the game is "prove the first movie wrong" and make a successful park.
But, no one would dare try to rebuild the park. No one would be so daring. MANY lives here taken becuase of the first park and the attempt to build one in San Diego. Investors would never go for it, and unless BioSyn is as richer than Disney, it's impossible to build a park without any investors at all.

The main thing is that they'd be worried about safety, and due to the track record it already has, investors would be questioning if it was actually worth it all.

Plus, if that was the actual plot for the fourth film, it would terrible. It would have the same plot as the first film. Not very original.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 25, 2012, 08:15:53 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Feb 25, 2012, 06:14:58 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 25, 2012, 03:23:18 PM
Not to mention that if a lion runs loose in a city, it's one thing. If a Tyrannosaurus runs loose in said city -- it's a whole another thing.
That's okay, because it's happening on an island, where there's pens.

According to the movies, the only problem with the park was human error. With the books that's a different story, but my movie idea follows from the movies (which I don't feel explored the "chaos theory" angle as deeply as the book did).

Even according to the movies, the issues I raised in my earlier post can't be rectified.

Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 25, 2012, 07:29:41 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Feb 25, 2012, 06:14:58 PM
That's okay, because it's happening on an island, where there's pens.
A lion cannot cause as much damage as a Tyrannosaurus -- not only to people but also to structures. A Tyrannosaurus getting free for mistake would not only likely injure -or kill- visitors, but would also destroy some park structures.

Not to mention the fences could be easily disabled by a completely unintentional accident, or even a storm. There's a lot of variants.

In JPOG they partially solved this problem by introducing these bunker things, which I think are actually a good idea.

You can easily solve those problems with a backup generator which any installation has.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenomrph on Feb 25, 2012, 08:52:40 PM
QuoteBut aside from that ... the Raptors were already out ... and for God knows how long and laying eggs in the wild (long enough to have them hatching). Which never made sense to me since there were no incidents or evidence of unaccounted for, or extra raptors running about within the pens of the other animals.
The movie doesn't indicate that or Grant would have called attention to it. The only thing he picks up on is that they're breeding, not that they were getting out. There were only 3 raptors in an incredibly secure paddock - when the power goes out they have to rip their way out and the movie shows the destroyed fences to make it clear that they're free. If they had free reign of the park because they could come and go as they pleased, they wouldn't have bothered ripping their way through the fences when the power went down.
Not to mention Harding and the others would have found carcasses of the animals the Raptors would have been killing.

The hatched eggs is a bit of a plot-hole, just like the cliff next to the T-rex fence that isn't present when the T-rex breaks out.

QuoteBut, no one would dare try to rebuild the park. No one would be so daring. MANY lives here taken becuase of the first park and the attempt to build one in San Diego.
Yes but as stated, that was entirely due to human error/sabotage. The only reason a T-rex got loose on the mainland was because Nick and Sarah swapped out Roland's bullets with a tranquilizer so he couldn't kill it, and then the Ingen team decided to take the T-rex along without knowing what they were doing - had they not gotten involved, the T-rex would have been killed by Roland and that would have been that. They didn't originally intend on bringing the T-rex with them.
The only reason the trailer went over the cliff was because Sarah (stupidly) brought the baby T-rex back to the trailer, and the only reason the Ingen team members got killed was because Sarah and Nick set all the dinosaurs loose and then they were forced to trek through Raptor territory to get to the alternate radio. Up to that point, the Ingen team had everything under control. All the dinosaurs were penned up and their base camp was secure.

The first two movies consistently show that the dinosaurs could be controlled and contained, and things only went crazy when people started sabotaging stuff.

QuotePlus, if that was the actual plot for the fourth film, it would terrible. It would have the same plot as the first film. Not very original.
That's kind of the point. It's more of a sequel-remake than anything -- the original will be 20 years old next year, my idea would allow for a lot of the same ideas as the original, but handled in a different way - an entirely new generation would get to see a fully-functional Jurassic Park with smiling, happy people interacting with dinosaurs, something you never get to see in the first movie. That was one of the things that really sparked my imagination when I was 9 and the original movie came out, "what would it be like to go to a dinosaur theme park?". My idea would explore that. You'd get to see completely new attractions and dinosaurs, and you'd also have a new cast of characters for people to get attached to.

I wouldn't want to bring back any returning characters from the prior movies, because why would they come back? Hell, I'd outright have a cameo during the opening titles or something of Grant and/or Malcolm getting interviewed and asked if they're going to visit the new Jurassic Park, and have them saying "hell no".

And once everything starts to go wrong, the scope is much, much bigger - if you've got hundreds of people trapped on the island, especially if it's a bunch of civilian tourists, that creates a completely different dynamic than when you've got 8 people trapped on the island. You'd have mob mentality at work.

QuoteEven according to the movies, the issues I raised in my earlier post can't be rectified.
Evidently they can - the movies had dinosaurs living just fine on two separate islands without having to cope with food supply or CO2 issues.
Sure they'd be a problem if you were being 100% realistic and trying to build a Jurassic Park in real life, but according to the movies' logic they're evidently not a problem.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Feb 26, 2012, 01:33:58 AM
I don't think you're getting the point I'm trying to make: I'm not saying it's impossible to contain a park full of dinosaurs, but what I'm saying is that a dinosaur park has gotten a really bad reputation, and no one would ever want to build the park again. It worked in TLW becuase the public didn't know about Isla Nublar and investors were giving InGen a second chance. But that second chance is gone and the public is now completely aware of everything that went on.

And you wanted it to be a remake, then you might as well as make it an actual remake. As for a sequel, it just isn't the best idea. If you're thinking of a reboot, it's still not the best idea. At least, in my opinion.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenomrph on Feb 26, 2012, 04:29:04 AM
Quotewhat I'm saying is that a dinosaur park has gotten a really bad reputation, and no one would ever want to build the park again.
I get what you're saying, I just don't agree. I think the public would be aware and just wouldn't care - people would want to go see a dinosaur theme park (the third movie is evidence of that, where you've got unsanctioned, wildly unsafe boat tours near Isla Sorna).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Feb 26, 2012, 05:27:05 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Feb 26, 2012, 04:29:04 AM
Quotewhat I'm saying is that a dinosaur park has gotten a really bad reputation, and no one would ever want to build the park again.
I get what you're saying, I just don't agree. I think the public would be aware and just wouldn't care - people would want to go see a dinosaur theme park (the third movie is evidence of that, where you've got unsanctioned, wildly unsafe boat tours near Isla Sorna).
Wanting to see a dinosaur is different than wanting to go to a theme park. Why does it need to be a theme park specifically? Turning Isla Sorna into a natural preserve where scientists could study the animals makes more sense. I mean, a dinosaur theme park seems like an original idea created by Hammond to me. People may want to see the dinosaurs, but that doesn't mean they want a theme park with a restaurant, tours, a hotel, and rides. It's an odd idea when you think about it, becuase it's a lot different than a zoo (although, there are similar places like Sea World.)

So, if any company were able to own the animals, I don't think the first money maker idea will be 'Build another park!" I think it would be something more like researching them in hopes to find something productive. Like in TLW novel, they discuss how they can use the animals as test animals becuase they can't get in trouble becuase the animals are their products. There are lots of different ways to make money off of the dinosaurs, and some of those ways are more investor friendly. I think if that's the route they'll take in the fourth film, they should be trying to make money off of them in a different way rather than the way they've already tried and failed epically.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenomrph on Feb 26, 2012, 05:35:12 AM
That's something my idea addresses, though - it'd have them making money off them as a theme park, and also doing animal testing and other things of questionable ethics on the side, all in the name of profits.

A nature preserve is different from a zoo or a theme park because the public doesn't get to visit the nature preserve and see the dinosaurs up-close, especially if the nature preserve is meant "for scientists only".

One of the reasons the first movie was so successful was because the general public did want a dinosaur theme park, and the marketing reflected that. The movie was marketed as if Jurassic Park was a real place you could visit, with lunch boxes and T-shirts and stuffed animals and postcards and stuff. All the merchandise you see scattered throughout the movie is real stuff you could actually buy at the time the movie came out. It was really quite clever. The Jurassic Park ride at Universal Studios is the same way - it's done as if you're visiting the "real" Jurassic Park, and it's one of the most popular attractions Universal Studios has ever had. Every time real-life scientists mention potentially cloning extinct animals or dinosaurs, the media inevitably says "so how long until we get a real Jurassic Park?".

To say people wouldn't want a dinosaur theme park and wouldn't pay money to visit it is objectively false. It's true in real life and it's one of the reasons the first movie captured the imaginations of so many people and made it such a success. Having it be "true" from a storytelling perspective is extra-easy if your real-life audience already wants it to be true anyway.
Not to mention my story idea would have it actually work (for a while at least), so "could it work?" would be a moot point since from a story perspective it does work.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Feb 26, 2012, 05:49:32 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Feb 26, 2012, 05:35:12 AM
That's something my idea addresses, though - it'd have them making money off them as a theme park, and also doing animal testing and other things of questionable ethics on the side, all in the name of profits.

A nature preserve is different from a zoo or a theme park because the public doesn't get to visit the nature preserve and see the dinosaurs up-close, especially if the nature preserve is meant "for scientists only".

One of the reasons the first movie was so successful was because the general public did want a dinosaur theme park, and the marketing reflected that. The movie was marketed as if Jurassic Park was a real place you could visit, with lunch boxes and T-shirts and stuffed animals and postcards and stuff. All the merchandise you see scattered throughout the movie is real stuff you could actually buy at the time the movie came out. It was really quite clever. The Jurassic Park ride at Universal Studios is the same way - it's done as if you're visiting the "real" Jurassic Park, and it's one of the most popular attractions Universal Studios has ever had. Every time real-life scientists mention potentially cloning extinct animals or dinosaurs, the media inevitably says "so how long until we get a real Jurassic Park?".

To say people wouldn't want a dinosaur theme park and wouldn't pay money to visit it is objectively false. It's true in real life and it's one of the reasons the first movie captured the imaginations of so many people and made it such a success. Having it be "true" from a storytelling perspective is extra-easy if your real-life audience already wants it to be true anyway.
Not to mention my story idea would have it actually work (for a while at least), so "could it work?" would be a moot point since from a story perspective it does work.
You're forgetting about inside the Jurassic Park universe. People died in the San Diego incident. People died in the Jurassic Park incident. People learned about all this secrecy and conspiracy. The wonder of a dinosaur them park is taken away from the terribleness of it all. People in that universe are now use to dinosaurs on Isla Sorna far away, and the idea just doesn't seem as amazing.

And it doesn't exactly work from a story telling perspective. It's re-hashing the first film but with different circumstances. So, it doesn't really work. At least for not a fan. For some one who doesn't really give a shit about the franchise and just want to watch it becuase it has cool dinosaurs, it works becuase they don't care about the overall story of the franchise. Creating ANOTHER park and have it coincidentally break down again is just finding a lousy excuse for a sequel, and just adds a level of stupidity. The franchise has already gains a few levels of stupidity becuase of Jurassic Park 3, and it needs a something a little more intelligent than copying the first film. If you wanted it to work in a story telling perspective, it would go into a different direction, yet not too far off from the original road, and give us something new but good. I fail how giving us one of the most unoriginal JP 4 concepts will do that. It just doesn't for me.

But like I said, it's just my opinion. You like your idea, and that's good for you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenomrph on Feb 26, 2012, 06:27:43 AM
QuoteThe wonder of a dinosaur them park is taken away from the terribleness of it all. People in that universe are now use to dinosaurs on Isla Sorna far away, and the idea just doesn't seem as amazing.
Are you kidding? If I knew there was a dinosaur theme park I could visit instead of just watching documentaries on Animal Planet or whatever, I'd be the first one in line to go visit it, and I know I'm not alone. It's why zoos and museums and whatnot are still popular, because there's a significant difference between seeing the stuff "up close" and watching it on TV.

People got killed? Well that sucks, but people get killed in zoo accidents and whatnot when they underestimate/misunderstand the animals or people make stupid mistakes, and yet zoos still function and people still visit them. All you need to do is assure people of their safety (and even if you don't, you'll get the adrenaline-junkie crowd) and people will pay money and come back.

Like I said, selling the "in universe" part is easy when your audience already wants it to be true.

QuoteAt least for not a fan. For some one who doesn't really give a shit about the franchise and just want to watch it becuase it has cool dinosaurs, it works becuase they don't care about the overall story of the franchise. Creating ANOTHER park and have it coincidentally break down again is just finding a lousy excuse for a sequel, and just adds a level of stupidity. The franchise has already gains a few levels of stupidity becuase of Jurassic Park 3, and it needs a something a little more intelligent than copying the first film. If you wanted it to work in a story telling perspective, it would go into a different direction, yet not too far off from the original road, and give us something new but good. I fail how giving us one of the most unoriginal JP 4 concepts will do that.
Did... did you really just play the "true fan" card? Seriously?

I'm a huge JP fan, I have been since the first movie came out. There's plenty of significant differences between my idea and the original - new dinosaurs, new attractions, new characters, actually seeing a fully-functional park (one of the major appeals of the original movie, which the movie didn't actually do). I'm sorry you don't like the idea I guess, but I also know you're in the minority based on the responses I've seen in this thread, on JP forums, and on other movie forums where I've tossed it around.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Kol on Feb 26, 2012, 12:50:30 PM
Quote from: evolution_rex on Feb 26, 2012, 05:49:32 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Feb 26, 2012, 05:35:12 AM
That's something my idea addresses, though - it'd have them making money off them as a theme park, and also doing animal testing and other things of questionable ethics on the side, all in the name of profits.

A nature preserve is different from a zoo or a theme park because the public doesn't get to visit the nature preserve and see the dinosaurs up-close, especially if the nature preserve is meant "for scientists only".

One of the reasons the first movie was so successful was because the general public did want a dinosaur theme park, and the marketing reflected that. The movie was marketed as if Jurassic Park was a real place you could visit, with lunch boxes and T-shirts and stuffed animals and postcards and stuff. All the merchandise you see scattered throughout the movie is real stuff you could actually buy at the time the movie came out. It was really quite clever. The Jurassic Park ride at Universal Studios is the same way - it's done as if you're visiting the "real" Jurassic Park, and it's one of the most popular attractions Universal Studios has ever had. Every time real-life scientists mention potentially cloning extinct animals or dinosaurs, the media inevitably says "so how long until we get a real Jurassic Park?".

To say people wouldn't want a dinosaur theme park and wouldn't pay money to visit it is objectively false. It's true in real life and it's one of the reasons the first movie captured the imaginations of so many people and made it such a success. Having it be "true" from a storytelling perspective is extra-easy if your real-life audience already wants it to be true anyway.
Not to mention my story idea would have it actually work (for a while at least), so "could it work?" would be a moot point since from a story perspective it does work.
You're forgetting about inside the Jurassic Park universe. People died in the San Diego incident. People died in the Jurassic Park incident. People learned about all this secrecy and conspiracy. The wonder of a dinosaur them park is taken away from the terribleness of it all. People in that universe are now use to dinosaurs on Isla Sorna far away, and the idea just doesn't seem as amazing.

i think your drifting a far bit from reality...
look JP III again during grant's speech, they are a lot of people who want to raise questions about the nublar park & the san diego incident.

and how in the world would a bunch of dead people prevent me for my love for dinosaurs and the possibility to see one?
does the foxconn-self-murder prevent any one to buy any x-boxes and iphones? i don't think so.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Feb 26, 2012, 06:33:54 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Feb 26, 2012, 06:27:43 AM
QuoteThe wonder of a dinosaur them park is taken away from the terribleness of it all. People in that universe are now use to dinosaurs on Isla Sorna far away, and the idea just doesn't seem as amazing.
Are you kidding? If I knew there was a dinosaur theme park I could visit instead of just watching documentaries on Animal Planet or whatever, I'd be the first one in line to go visit it, and I know I'm not alone. It's why zoos and museums and whatnot are still popular, because there's a significant difference between seeing the stuff "up close" and watching it on TV.

People got killed? Well that sucks, but people get killed in zoo accidents and whatnot when they underestimate/misunderstand the animals or people make stupid mistakes, and yet zoos still function and people still visit them. All you need to do is assure people of their safety (and even if you don't, you'll get the adrenaline-junkie crowd) and people will pay money and come back.

Like I said, selling the "in universe" part is easy when your audience already wants it to be true.

QuoteAt least for not a fan. For some one who doesn't really give a shit about the franchise and just want to watch it becuase it has cool dinosaurs, it works becuase they don't care about the overall story of the franchise. Creating ANOTHER park and have it coincidentally break down again is just finding a lousy excuse for a sequel, and just adds a level of stupidity. The franchise has already gains a few levels of stupidity becuase of Jurassic Park 3, and it needs a something a little more intelligent than copying the first film. If you wanted it to work in a story telling perspective, it would go into a different direction, yet not too far off from the original road, and give us something new but good. I fail how giving us one of the most unoriginal JP 4 concepts will do that.
Did... did you really just play the "true fan" card? Seriously?

I'm a huge JP fan, I have been since the first movie came out. There's plenty of significant differences between my idea and the original - new dinosaurs, new attractions, new characters, actually seeing a fully-functional park (one of the major appeals of the original movie, which the movie didn't actually do). I'm sorry you don't like the idea I guess, but I also know you're in the minority based on the responses I've seen in this thread, on JP forums, and on other movie forums where I've tossed it around.
You're failing to see my point. You ignored my arguments about investors and how it's basically a re-hash of the first film. That is becuase you like your idea and want to stick with your idea.

And actually, I'm not much of a minority when  it comes to JP forums, becuase I'm a member at a lot of them and it's come up a lot, and a lot of people agree with me.

I realize your a fan and all, and your concept for a fourth film is something that the creators of the films might actually do, but I can say it will be a terrible movie and will not finalize the franchise but just bring a concept that's been used so many times before. It may be becuase I want the fourth film to have a conclusion not just an excuse to have a fourth film.

I mean, I really don't want to see something bad happen to a park becuase I already know that something will go wrong. Power goes down? OMG! It's too obvious. People are going to steal dinosaurs or embryos? It's been done before.

And, your not putting yourselves in the universe. Like I said, people want to see dinosaurs, but the first thing that pops into your head is theme park? Just becuase it was used in the first film doesn't make it a common practice to make profit. So, along with spending millions of dollars on a theme park, they'd have to spend millions on catching the dinosaurs, and then the investors have to be willing to think it's safe. Yes, people die in zoo accidents often, but with Jurassic Park, we've got animals larger than elephants and they've seemed to have destroyed the opportunities in the past. That doesn't look to good in the eyes of the public and especially in the eye of investors. They're not going to think 'oh, it was the people's fault, not the dinosaurs. Everything will be fine,' they're going to think 'This hasn't worked out well in the past, and we don't want it happening again.' So, unless you've got some ingenious way that the dinosaurs are going to escape and attack everyone, they've better have some low security. But it doesn't really make sense for it to have low security, considering the investor's worry. So, that just doesn't make sense to me.

To avoid further arguments, I'll shut up about it. I realize that a lot of people here agree with you, and I won't make myself look more like an ass. I apologize for the trouble, but I'm just way against the idea.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenomrph on Feb 26, 2012, 07:33:43 PM
QuoteYou're failing to see my point. You ignored my arguments about investors and how it's basically a re-hash of the first film. That is becuase you like your idea and want to stick with your idea.
No, there's a difference between understanding your point and agreeing with it. I'm doing the former.

QuoteAnd actually, I'm not much of a minority when  it comes to JP forums, becuase I'm a member at a lot of them and it's come up a lot, and a lot of people agree with me.
By all means, link me. :)

QuoteI realize your a fan and all, and your concept for a fourth film is something that the creators of the films might actually do, but I can say it will be a terrible movie and will not finalize the franchise but just bring a concept that's been used so many times before. It may be becuase I want the fourth film to have a conclusion not just an excuse to have a fourth film.

I mean, I really don't want to see something bad happen to a park becuase I already know that something will go wrong. Power goes down? OMG! It's too obvious. People are going to steal dinosaurs or embryos? It's been done before.
Frankly it doesn't need a "conclusion". If anything I'd like to see it keep going, because dinosaurs are cool and the idea of humans interacting with dinosaurs and a dinosaur theme-park is cool.

QuoteAnd, your not putting yourselves in the universe. Like I said, people want to see dinosaurs, but the first thing that pops into your head is theme park? Just becuase it was used in the first film doesn't make it a common practice to make profit. So, along with spending millions of dollars on a theme park, they'd have to spend millions on catching the dinosaurs, and then the investors have to be willing to think it's safe.
They wouldn't have to catch anything - they just clone new ones. They'd have Ingen's data and materials.

QuoteThey're not going to think 'oh, it was the people's fault, not the dinosaurs. Everything will be fine,' they're going to think 'This hasn't worked out well in the past, and we don't want it happening again.'
No I'm pretty sure people would think the way I said they'd think, for the reason I (and others) said.

QuoteSo, unless you've got some ingenious way that the dinosaurs are going to escape and attack everyone, they've better have some low security. But it doesn't really make sense for it to have low security, considering the investor's worry.
Alternately, they have good security that fails due to something unforseen - chaos theory in action. It was kind of the point of the first book, and it was something that the first movie didn't explore.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Feb 26, 2012, 07:37:53 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Feb 26, 2012, 07:33:43 PM
By all means, link me. :)
Becuase of this argument, I posted a thread in JPLegacy (A popular JP website where work as a moderator) to discuss the idea. I haven't got much replies yet, but we'll see how other people think of the idea.
http://www.jplegacy.org/board/showthread.php?p=720752#post720752 (http://www.jplegacy.org/board/showthread.php?p=720752#post720752)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenomrph on Feb 26, 2012, 07:57:07 PM
Just replied to your topic on JPLegacy. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sso02V on Feb 26, 2012, 08:45:15 PM
If we still have zoos after people jump into lion enclosures and get eaten, and elephants bust out and go on a rampage, I really don't see why a secure compound on an island thousands of miles away from anything would be any cause for alarm just because these animals escaped 20 years ago due to industrial sabotage.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenomrph on Feb 26, 2012, 09:08:24 PM
Bingo, exactly. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 27, 2012, 03:20:02 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Feb 26, 2012, 04:29:04 AM
Quotewhat I'm saying is that a dinosaur park has gotten a really bad reputation, and no one would ever want to build the park again.
I get what you're saying, I just don't agree. I think the public would be aware and just wouldn't care - people would want to go see a dinosaur theme park (the third movie is evidence of that, where you've got unsanctioned, wildly unsafe boat tours near Isla Sorna).

You know, I honestly always thought in the third film, the island was picked at random. The way Billy and Ben freak out after the boat is trashed, none of them say "OMFG it must've been a dinosaur!!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenomrph on Feb 27, 2012, 04:17:00 AM
They knew where they were - they were on a parasailing tour called "Dino-SOAR". The whole point was to see dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 27, 2012, 04:17:41 AM
I was thinking about, but again, why act like the boat trashing was a big WTF?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Feb 27, 2012, 04:21:44 AM
There is so much wrong with that scene.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on Feb 27, 2012, 04:26:05 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 27, 2012, 04:17:41 AM
I was thinking about, but again, why act like the boat trashing was a big WTF?

That might not have expected a dinosaur swimming in the ocean.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenomrph on Feb 27, 2012, 05:21:25 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 27, 2012, 04:17:41 AM
I was thinking about, but again, why act like the boat trashing was a big WTF?
Probably the same thing the audience was thinking - a dinosaur did it, but how?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 27, 2012, 02:48:31 PM
I think the answer is obvious: Spinosaurus. It becomes obvious once we see it swimming at the end before it attacks the boat.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 27, 2012, 02:55:52 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 27, 2012, 02:48:31 PM
I think the answer is obvious: Spinosaurus. It becomes obvious once we see it swimming at the end before it attacks the boat.

If so, then he was one really annoying horny-for-human-flesh motherf**king dino.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 27, 2012, 03:25:38 PM
What?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenomrph on Feb 27, 2012, 04:09:15 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 27, 2012, 02:48:31 PM
I think the answer is obvious: Spinosaurus. It becomes obvious once we see it swimming at the end before it attacks the boat.
That makes enough sense, but the first time I saw the movie and didn't know the Spinosaurus would be swimming around, seeing that boat all torn up was a pretty big "WTF?" moment.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sso02V on Feb 27, 2012, 05:26:50 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 27, 2012, 02:55:52 PM
If so, then he was one really annoying horny-for-human-flesh motherf**king dino.
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 27, 2012, 03:25:38 PM
What?
Probably talking about just how doggedly the thing was chasing everyone. In the other movies, when they came across a predatory dino, it was usually because they wandered into its territory. Spino was stalking them like a jealous boyfriend. Expending way too much energy for what amounted to a couple of light snacks.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Feb 27, 2012, 05:33:14 PM
Quote from: Sso02V on Feb 27, 2012, 05:26:50 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 27, 2012, 02:55:52 PM
If so, then he was one really annoying horny-for-human-flesh motherf**king dino.
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 27, 2012, 03:25:38 PM
What?
Probably talking about just how doggedly the thing was chasing everyone. In the other movies, when they came across a predatory dino, it was usually because they wandered into its territory. Spino was stalking them like a jealous boyfriend. Expending way too much energy for what amounted to a couple of light snacks.

That's how I read it. Only a sick mind would imagine a big ass dinosaur wanting to f**k little bits of human flesh.

A sick mind, I tell you!  :laugh:

I mean, as if humans didn't have enough to worry about on an island full of dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 27, 2012, 07:24:58 PM
Quote from: Sso02V on Feb 27, 2012, 05:26:50 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 27, 2012, 02:55:52 PM
If so, then he was one really annoying horny-for-human-flesh motherf**king dino.
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 27, 2012, 03:25:38 PM
What?
Probably talking about just how doggedly the thing was chasing everyone. In the other movies, when they came across a predatory dino, it was usually because they wandered into its territory. Spino was stalking them like a jealous boyfriend. Expending way too much energy for what amounted to a couple of light snacks.

Yeah, that's how I meant it.  He was like an annoying nosey prick.  I really wish the Rex just showed up in the end and kicked its f**king ass.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Kol on Feb 28, 2012, 12:44:18 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 27, 2012, 07:24:58 PM
Quote from: Sso02V on Feb 27, 2012, 05:26:50 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 27, 2012, 02:55:52 PM
If so, then he was one really annoying horny-for-human-flesh motherf**king dino.
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 27, 2012, 03:25:38 PM
What?
Probably talking about just how doggedly the thing was chasing everyone. In the other movies, when they came across a predatory dino, it was usually because they wandered into its territory. Spino was stalking them like a jealous boyfriend. Expending way too much energy for what amounted to a couple of light snacks.

Yeah, that's how I meant it.  He was like an annoying nosey prick.  I really wish the Rex just showed up in the end and kicked its f**king ass.

imagine if that would be in the fourth movie, a rex killing the spinosaurus. the crowd would be cheer up and whooooo! like it did when jacob took his shirt in twilight.  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Runner on Feb 28, 2012, 01:03:00 AM
That Spinosaurus in JP3 had a serious obsession.  ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 28, 2012, 01:56:01 AM
Quote from: Kol on Feb 28, 2012, 12:44:18 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 27, 2012, 07:24:58 PM
Quote from: Sso02V on Feb 27, 2012, 05:26:50 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 27, 2012, 02:55:52 PM
If so, then he was one really annoying horny-for-human-flesh motherf**king dino.
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 27, 2012, 03:25:38 PM
What?
Probably talking about just how doggedly the thing was chasing everyone. In the other movies, when they came across a predatory dino, it was usually because they wandered into its territory. Spino was stalking them like a jealous boyfriend. Expending way too much energy for what amounted to a couple of light snacks.

Yeah, that's how I meant it.  He was like an annoying nosey prick.  I really wish the Rex just showed up in the end and kicked its f**king ass.

imagine if that would be in the fourth movie, a rex killing the spinosaurus. the crowd would be cheer up and whooooo! like it did when jacob took his shirt in twilight.  :D

You watched Twilight?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Kol on Feb 28, 2012, 03:45:02 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 28, 2012, 01:56:01 AM
Quote from: Kol on Feb 28, 2012, 12:44:18 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 27, 2012, 07:24:58 PM
Quote from: Sso02V on Feb 27, 2012, 05:26:50 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 27, 2012, 02:55:52 PM
If so, then he was one really annoying horny-for-human-flesh motherf**king dino.
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 27, 2012, 03:25:38 PM
What?
Probably talking about just how doggedly the thing was chasing everyone. In the other movies, when they came across a predatory dino, it was usually because they wandered into its territory. Spino was stalking them like a jealous boyfriend. Expending way too much energy for what amounted to a couple of light snacks.

Yeah, that's how I meant it.  He was like an annoying nosey prick.  I really wish the Rex just showed up in the end and kicked its f**king ass.

imagine if that would be in the fourth movie, a rex killing the spinosaurus. the crowd would be cheer up and whooooo! like it did when jacob took his shirt in twilight.  :D

You watched Twilight?

nope, but i have female friends who delivered this message to me. and at least i would react like this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: coolbreeze on Feb 28, 2012, 05:06:36 AM
Quote from: Kol on Feb 28, 2012, 03:45:02 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 28, 2012, 01:56:01 AM
Quote from: Kol on Feb 28, 2012, 12:44:18 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 27, 2012, 07:24:58 PM
Quote from: Sso02V on Feb 27, 2012, 05:26:50 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 27, 2012, 02:55:52 PM
If so, then he was one really annoying horny-for-human-flesh motherf**king dino.
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 27, 2012, 03:25:38 PM
What?
Probably talking about just how doggedly the thing was chasing everyone. In the other movies, when they came across a predatory dino, it was usually because they wandered into its territory. Spino was stalking them like a jealous boyfriend. Expending way too much energy for what amounted to a couple of light snacks.

Yeah, that's how I meant it.  He was like an annoying nosey prick.  I really wish the Rex just showed up in the end and kicked its f**king ass.

imagine if that would be in the fourth movie, a rex killing the spinosaurus. the crowd would be cheer up and whooooo! like it did when jacob took his shirt in twilight.  :D

You watched Twilight?

nope, but i have female friends who delivered this message to me. and at least i would react like this.

You would cheer when Jacob takes his shirt off?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sso02V on Feb 28, 2012, 02:19:12 PM
I've always wanted one dorky-ass scene where a predatory dino passes by a human without eating them because their bright Hawaiian shirt makes them look poisonous.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 28, 2012, 02:59:23 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 27, 2012, 07:24:58 PM
Quote from: Sso02V on Feb 27, 2012, 05:26:50 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 27, 2012, 02:55:52 PM
If so, then he was one really annoying horny-for-human-flesh motherf**king dino.
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 27, 2012, 03:25:38 PM
What?
Probably talking about just how doggedly the thing was chasing everyone. In the other movies, when they came across a predatory dino, it was usually because they wandered into its territory. Spino was stalking them like a jealous boyfriend. Expending way too much energy for what amounted to a couple of light snacks.

Yeah, that's how I meant it.  He was like an annoying nosey prick.  I really wish the Rex just showed up in the end and kicked its f**king ass.

You could argue that the whole island was practically Spino's hunting territory. Big carnivores need big hunting ranges and Spino was friggin' enormous.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Kol on Feb 28, 2012, 04:10:56 PM
Quote from: coolbreeze on Feb 28, 2012, 05:06:36 AM
Quote from: Kol on Feb 28, 2012, 03:45:02 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 28, 2012, 01:56:01 AM
Quote from: Kol on Feb 28, 2012, 12:44:18 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 27, 2012, 07:24:58 PM
Quote from: Sso02V on Feb 27, 2012, 05:26:50 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 27, 2012, 02:55:52 PM
If so, then he was one really annoying horny-for-human-flesh motherf**king dino.
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 27, 2012, 03:25:38 PM
What?
Probably talking about just how doggedly the thing was chasing everyone. In the other movies, when they came across a predatory dino, it was usually because they wandered into its territory. Spino was stalking them like a jealous boyfriend. Expending way too much energy for what amounted to a couple of light snacks.

Yeah, that's how I meant it.  He was like an annoying nosey prick.  I really wish the Rex just showed up in the end and kicked its f**king ass.

imagine if that would be in the fourth movie, a rex killing the spinosaurus. the crowd would be cheer up and whooooo! like it did when jacob took his shirt in twilight.  :D

You watched Twilight?

nope, but i have female friends who delivered this message to me. and at least i would react like this.

You would cheer when Jacob takes his shirt off?

when the rex kill the spino off, yu retard.  ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 28, 2012, 04:17:42 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 28, 2012, 02:59:23 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 27, 2012, 07:24:58 PM
Quote from: Sso02V on Feb 27, 2012, 05:26:50 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 27, 2012, 02:55:52 PM
If so, then he was one really annoying horny-for-human-flesh motherf**king dino.
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 27, 2012, 03:25:38 PM
What?
Probably talking about just how doggedly the thing was chasing everyone. In the other movies, when they came across a predatory dino, it was usually because they wandered into its territory. Spino was stalking them like a jealous boyfriend. Expending way too much energy for what amounted to a couple of light snacks.

Yeah, that's how I meant it.  He was like an annoying nosey prick.  I really wish the Rex just showed up in the end and kicked its f**king ass.

You could argue that the whole island was practically Spino's hunting territory. Big carnivores need big hunting ranges and Spino was friggin' enormous.

In reality, Tyrannosaurus was about the same size as how Spino was depicted in the film, at a recorded 16-18ft tall and around 45ft long.  The Rex shown in JPIII was merely 14ft tall and 37ft long. 

I have the comparative size chart...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.wikia.com%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2Fb%2Fb2%2FJP3-Statistics.jpg&hash=4e0c906eb49dcf28c107a0f5e5d59c780f3d5c4d)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.wikia.com%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2Fd%2Fd2%2FSPINO_WP_1024.jpg&hash=68d4480b99372fbd28f548935e40825630f3204e)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on Feb 28, 2012, 07:53:35 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 28, 2012, 02:59:23 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 27, 2012, 07:24:58 PM
Quote from: Sso02V on Feb 27, 2012, 05:26:50 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 27, 2012, 02:55:52 PM
If so, then he was one really annoying horny-for-human-flesh motherf**king dino.
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 27, 2012, 03:25:38 PM
What?
Probably talking about just how doggedly the thing was chasing everyone. In the other movies, when they came across a predatory dino, it was usually because they wandered into its territory. Spino was stalking them like a jealous boyfriend. Expending way too much energy for what amounted to a couple of light snacks.

Yeah, that's how I meant it.  He was like an annoying nosey prick.  I really wish the Rex just showed up in the end and kicked its f**king ass.

You could argue that the whole island was practically Spino's hunting territory. Big carnivores need big hunting ranges and Spino was friggin' enormous.

Joe Johnston stated somewhere in the behind the scenes or featurettes that he wanted to use a predator that could actually cause an extinction on the island.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 28, 2012, 07:59:07 PM
Yeah, except I heard Jack Horner say it. Either way, it's total bullshit. Spinosaurus wasn't equipped to tackle large dinosaurs. The stench my stools emanate could cause a greater extinction than that fish-eating monster.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 28, 2012, 08:00:20 PM
Horner's paleontological statements about the Spinosaurus in the making of featurettes of the third film are downright hilarious.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 28, 2012, 08:01:01 PM
Well he wasn't wrong when he said Spinosaurus was the largest carnivorous dinosaur ever. Only problem was, when he said it, it hadn't been announced publicly yet so I didn't believe it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 28, 2012, 08:07:37 PM
I'm not talking about that, but about how he theorizes in those extras that a carnivorous Dinosaur's savagery is directly proportional to its size. :laugh: Among other things.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: The Runner on Feb 28, 2012, 09:05:08 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 28, 2012, 08:07:37 PM
I'm not talking about that, but about how he theorizes in those extras that a carnivorous Dinosaur's savagery is directly proportional to its size. :laugh: Among other things.

Oh dear lord. He is the Strause of JP. :/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Kol on Feb 28, 2012, 10:53:50 PM
Quote from: The Runner on Feb 28, 2012, 09:05:08 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 28, 2012, 08:07:37 PM
I'm not talking about that, but about how he theorizes in those extras that a carnivorous Dinosaur's savagery is directly proportional to its size. :laugh: Among other things.

Oh dear lord. He is the Strause of JP. :/

maybe horner, accept for the filmmakers, see ingen's creation as genetic, manipulated abomination and that's why there is such discrepancies and use this, as a subtle reason; the pteranodon's teeth for example?

remember the lizard tongues of the dinosaur's from the book?
and horner knows that it the jp movies, since the third becomes entertaining joy-rides and realise on the old fashioned way of dinosaurs. less feathers.  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on Mar 02, 2012, 02:50:24 PM
Nice bit of new T-Rex rehearsal footage from the first film, courtesy of the Stan Winston School of Character Arts:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=B4J9TBlFxAg# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=B4J9TBlFxAg#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 02, 2012, 03:07:35 PM
Wooooooooooow. That must've scared some people shitless when that thing started to move.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 02, 2012, 06:00:25 PM
Quote from: Bad Replicant on Mar 02, 2012, 02:50:24 PM
Nice bit of new T-Rex rehearsal footage from the first film, courtesy of the Stan Winston School of Character Arts:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=B4J9TBlFxAg# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=B4J9TBlFxAg#)
When something looks so lifelike in a backstage film, you know it's a masterpiece of work.
Man... I want to watch Jurassic Park again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Mar 02, 2012, 06:46:27 PM
Quote from: Bad Replicant on Mar 02, 2012, 02:50:24 PM
Nice bit of new T-Rex rehearsal footage from the first film, courtesy of the Stan Winston School of Character Arts:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=B4J9TBlFxAg# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=B4J9TBlFxAg#)

this is so real and awesome looking ;D what posesses modern movie makers by using CGI over animatronics seriously. CGI is in no possible scenario more real looking.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Mar 02, 2012, 07:07:20 PM
Amazing. It's so quiet. I'd expect a lot more mechanical sounds coming from it behind the scenes.

It's very intimidating too. If I was near it, I'd be nervous the thing would glitch and knock my head off.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on Mar 02, 2012, 09:04:43 PM
Quote from: Bad Replicant on Mar 02, 2012, 02:50:24 PM
Nice bit of new T-Rex rehearsal footage from the first film, courtesy of the Stan Winston School of Character Arts:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=B4J9TBlFxAg# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=B4J9TBlFxAg#)

I feel like a kid again. :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xan21 on Mar 02, 2012, 10:18:52 PM
I always wanted to see a Gigantosaurus, it's close to a Rex, and I added a sabretooth ;-)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc00.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2Ff%2F2011%2F220%2F7%2Fb%2Fjurassic_park_remake_sketch_1_by_xandervanduijvenbode-d45tw72.jpg&hash=ec75c0c2b41010aac480947d3e1475e9cdc59df5)

and the Pteranodons attacking helikopters was abandoned twice (The Lost World & JPIII)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc09.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2Ff%2F2011%2F220%2Ff%2Ff%2Fjurassic_park_remake_sketch_3_by_xandervanduijvenbode-d45twgt.jpg&hash=bd8d6838669701a7eb40794d318a6fb93f1304f3)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: RagingDragon on Mar 02, 2012, 11:44:47 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on Mar 02, 2012, 06:46:27 PM
Quote from: Bad Replicant on Mar 02, 2012, 02:50:24 PM
Nice bit of new T-Rex rehearsal footage from the first film, courtesy of the Stan Winston School of Character Arts:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=B4J9TBlFxAg# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=B4J9TBlFxAg#)

this is so real and awesome looking ;D what posesses modern movie makers by using CGI over animatronics seriously. CGI is in no possible scenario more real looking.
I totally agree.

Xan, dude, those pictures are fresh.

Do you have an art thread?  Your drawings please my eyes greatly.  Those dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 03, 2012, 05:49:49 AM
Quote from: Bad Replicant on Mar 02, 2012, 02:50:24 PM
Nice bit of new T-Rex rehearsal footage from the first film, courtesy of the Stan Winston School of Character Arts:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=B4J9TBlFxAg# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=B4J9TBlFxAg#)

Utterly beautiful.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 03, 2012, 07:38:13 AM
Quote from: Xan21 on Mar 02, 2012, 10:18:52 PM
I always wanted to see a Gigantosaurus, it's close to a Rex, and I added a sabretooth ;-)

Hate to be a cynical prick, but you mean Giganotosaurus. Gigantosaurus was a sauropod.

;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on Mar 03, 2012, 09:29:53 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Mar 02, 2012, 06:00:25 PM
Quote from: Bad Replicant on Mar 02, 2012, 02:50:24 PM
Nice bit of new T-Rex rehearsal footage from the first film, courtesy of the Stan Winston School of Character Arts:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=B4J9TBlFxAg# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=B4J9TBlFxAg#)
When something looks so lifelike in a backstage film, you know it's a masterpiece of work.
Man... I want to watch Jurassic Park again.
Seriously. I was surprised by just how fluid the movement of the entire puppet was. And this is the first one they built, too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: severen76 on Mar 03, 2012, 09:33:55 AM
I'm a little disappointed with the JP Blu-Ray. It looks great in some Scenesbut there's a he'll of a lot of grain in others.  Still a great film though. I can't wait to watch the new special features.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: KNIGHT on Mar 03, 2012, 07:37:36 PM
Quote from: severen76 on Mar 03, 2012, 09:33:55 AM
I'm a little disappointed with the JP Blu-Ray. It looks great in some Scenesbut there's a he'll of a lot of grain in others.  Still a great film though. I can't wait to watch the new special features.

Yeah, the Brachiosaurus scene, IMO, was definitely NOT made for HD.
But the Tyrannosaurus, on the other hand.. Jesus Christ, that looked awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 03, 2012, 08:04:47 PM
The scene where Grant waves down the Rex with flare...tell me that didn't make you quiver in fear after hearing that roar echo.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: severen76 on Mar 03, 2012, 08:09:27 PM
I think asleep somewhere in-between that part and where Ian gets flipped through the toilet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 03, 2012, 08:20:56 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 03, 2012, 08:04:47 PM
The scene where Grant waves down the Rex with flare...tell me that didn't make you quiver in fear after hearing that roar echo.

Excellent part. You even see Grant taken aback by it for a brief moment.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 03, 2012, 09:57:57 PM
Quote from: severen76 on Mar 03, 2012, 08:09:27 PM
I think asleep somewhere in-between that part and where Ian gets flipped through the toilet.

You feel asleep!?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: severen76 on Mar 03, 2012, 10:29:05 PM
Yeah, I know. My sleeping pattern's been really messed this past couple of weeks, with the shifts I've been doing; if I'm not working I've been sleeping.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 03, 2012, 10:32:57 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Mar 03, 2012, 08:20:56 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 03, 2012, 08:04:47 PM
The scene where Grant waves down the Rex with flare...tell me that didn't make you quiver in fear after hearing that roar echo.

Excellent part. You even see Grant taken aback by it for a brief moment.

God damn it! I need to get a Blu-Ray player....NOW!

I just don't want to replace ALL my favorite movies (I probably will end up doing this if I do get a Blu ray player).  I feel like I won't watch the DVDs anymore  :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Mar 03, 2012, 10:41:36 PM
OmegaZilla, do you have the photo from The Lost World where it looks like Spielberg is giving direction to the baby Stegosaurus? :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: severen76 on Mar 03, 2012, 10:44:36 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 03, 2012, 10:32:57 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Mar 03, 2012, 08:20:56 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 03, 2012, 08:04:47 PM
The scene where Grant waves down the Rex with flare...tell me that didn't make you quiver in fear after hearing that roar echo.

Excellent part. You even see Grant taken aback by it for a brief moment.

God damn it! I need to get a Blu-Ray player....NOW!

I just don't want to replace ALL my favorite movies (I probably will end up doing this if I do get a Blu ray player).  I feel like I won't watch the DVDs anymore  :'(

You won't regret buying. Just buy a couple of your favourite films, it's like watching them for the first time again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 03, 2012, 10:54:11 PM
Yes, the video quality is indeed excellent. There are a few shots that look a little dodgy, with grain in them, but its well worth it. Jurassic Park has never looked better. The scene in which the Rex breaks through the electrified fence between the two SUVs looks gorgeous in 1080p. The level of detail is great as well. For example, the beads of sweat on Muldoon's head right before he's about to be killed are superb to look at. Well worth an upgrade. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 03, 2012, 11:11:35 PM
Quote from: severen76 on Mar 03, 2012, 10:44:36 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 03, 2012, 10:32:57 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Mar 03, 2012, 08:20:56 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 03, 2012, 08:04:47 PM
The scene where Grant waves down the Rex with flare...tell me that didn't make you quiver in fear after hearing that roar echo.

Excellent part. You even see Grant taken aback by it for a brief moment.

God damn it! I need to get a Blu-Ray player....NOW!

I just don't want to replace ALL my favorite movies (I probably will end up doing this if I do get a Blu ray player).  I feel like I won't watch the DVDs anymore  :'(

You won't regret buying. Just buy a couple of your favourite films, it's like watching them for the first time again.

I believe you.  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Mar 04, 2012, 12:09:32 AM
Never saw this footage before. Some great Raptor running practical effects.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioIJMVQrQhY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioIJMVQrQhY#ws)

I would have given my teeth to have something like this in my dinosaur movie!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1208.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fcc377%2FBatChainPuller%2Fbeastmask-1.jpg&hash=3d349b22df2ab2a246d9849e507162ea0b158a58)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 04, 2012, 12:26:09 AM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Mar 04, 2012, 12:09:32 AM
Never saw this footage before. Some great Raptor running practical effects.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioIJMVQrQhY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioIJMVQrQhY#ws)

Yeah, that's definately from The Lost World, not JPIII.  Pretty interesting practical use; very realistic.   

You can tell the guy running from it was actually scared.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Mar 04, 2012, 12:29:46 AM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Mar 04, 2012, 12:09:32 AM
Never saw this footage before. Some great Raptor running practical effects.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioIJMVQrQhY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioIJMVQrQhY#ws)

I would have given my teeth to have something like this in my dinosaur movie!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1208.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fcc377%2FBatChainPuller%2Fbeastmask-1.jpg&hash=3d349b22df2ab2a246d9849e507162ea0b158a58)
Oh dear god, that's incredible.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on Mar 04, 2012, 12:36:09 AM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Mar 04, 2012, 12:09:32 AM
Never saw this footage before. Some great Raptor running practical effects.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioIJMVQrQhY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioIJMVQrQhY#ws)

I would have given my teeth to have something like this in my dinosaur movie!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1208.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fcc377%2FBatChainPuller%2Fbeastmask-1.jpg&hash=3d349b22df2ab2a246d9849e507162ea0b158a58)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9hmNrUNP4Y# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9hmNrUNP4Y#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 04, 2012, 12:45:35 AM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Mar 04, 2012, 12:36:09 AM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Mar 04, 2012, 12:09:32 AM
Never saw this footage before. Some great Raptor running practical effects.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioIJMVQrQhY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioIJMVQrQhY#ws)

I would have given my teeth to have something like this in my dinosaur movie!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1208.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fcc377%2FBatChainPuller%2Fbeastmask-1.jpg&hash=3d349b22df2ab2a246d9849e507162ea0b158a58)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9hmNrUNP4Y# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9hmNrUNP4Y#)

lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Mar 04, 2012, 09:48:36 AM
Quote from: Bad Replicant on Mar 02, 2012, 02:50:24 PM
Nice bit of new T-Rex rehearsal footage from the first film, courtesy of the Stan Winston School of Character Arts:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=B4J9TBlFxAg# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=B4J9TBlFxAg#)
Happy I went back a few pages to see this... incredible. It's movement is so fluid and it's presence is so intimidating. I'd be genuinely scared of that shit.

More goodness:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDUILhtdoTw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDUILhtdoTw#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hyfy8rrfOkM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hyfy8rrfOkM#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2xy6jl52WM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2xy6jl52WM#ws)

Faaaaan-tastic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 04, 2012, 10:02:47 AM
Those are all fantastic. Always found the Compsognathus a really sweet piece of nano-machinery. It sure takes a lot of craftsmanship to insert the minuscule mechanism that allowed its eyes to blink.
The Raptors from The Lost World are wondrous. Always been my favourites out of the three films.
The Pteranodon suit was actually used in just... 2 or 3 shots when the Pteranodon walks in the cage corridors. Though I love it, I can see why they did not use it extensively, as how the feet touch the ground doesn't click with me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Mar 04, 2012, 10:05:20 AM
How precise the puppetry of the compsognathus is just blows my mind. I swear, I just have to block out the wires and the briefly shown hands and it's damn-near a real creature. Just how it goes with these amazing animatronics. Truly the greatest form of creature creation.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 04, 2012, 10:07:53 AM
I absolutely agree. The result in the final film is wondrous. I love the shot of that little Creeper approaching Cathy and looking up.
They even managed to put pumps inside it to give the impression it was breathing (Harryhausen previously used a similar trick to make his stop-motion creation 'breathe' -- only he used a Sphygmomanometer. I don't think it's the same device used here of course, but the idea is indeed similar) -- and the detail was so well crafted you can see its ribs when it expires (evident just before Dieter Stark hits one with his electric device thing). Astounding.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Mar 04, 2012, 10:23:03 AM
"There haven't been any visitors on this island. It has no reason to fear man."
BZZZZT-
"Now it does."

I'm sure THAT got the sphygmomanothingymajiggit going!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xan21 on Mar 04, 2012, 01:02:33 PM
Am I the only one who hated the animatronics in TLW? I mean they used it so wonderful in Jurassic Park but in TLW they look too clunky and barely move, the stegasaurus and baby T rex were the worst imho, they look good in pictures but on video not so much and I think they felt compelled to still use them and maybe overuse them for SWS sake...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on Mar 04, 2012, 01:03:35 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Mar 04, 2012, 09:48:36 AM
Quote from: Bad Replicant on Mar 02, 2012, 02:50:24 PM
Nice bit of new T-Rex rehearsal footage from the first film, courtesy of the Stan Winston School of Character Arts:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=B4J9TBlFxAg# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=B4J9TBlFxAg#)
Happy I went back a few pages to see this... incredible. It's movement is so fluid and it's presence is so intimidating. I'd be genuinely scared of that shit.

More goodness:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDUILhtdoTw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDUILhtdoTw#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hyfy8rrfOkM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hyfy8rrfOkM#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2xy6jl52WM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2xy6jl52WM#ws)

Faaaaan-tastic.

Oh my god, that is beyond amazing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 04, 2012, 01:04:05 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on Mar 04, 2012, 01:02:33 PM
Am I the only one who hated the animatronics in TLW?
HNNNGRRRRKKKKKKKKKK--

Yes, yes, yes, yes you are.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenomrph on Mar 04, 2012, 04:18:45 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on Mar 02, 2012, 10:18:52 PM
I always wanted to see a Gigantosaurus, it's close to a Rex, and I added a sabretooth ;-)

http://fc00.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2011/220/7/b/jurassic_park_remake_sketch_1_by_xandervanduijvenbode-d45tw72.jpg

and the Pteranodons attacking helikopters was abandoned twice (The Lost World & JPIII)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc09.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2Ff%2F2011%2F220%2Ff%2Ff%2Fjurassic_park_remake_sketch_3_by_xandervanduijvenbode-d45twgt.jpg&hash=bd8d6838669701a7eb40794d318a6fb93f1304f3)
Did you draw those? Because they're pretty awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Mar 04, 2012, 05:00:51 PM
A few days ago, I was looking through some old photos from Christmas '93 or '94. when I saw that this was amongst the gifts I received that year.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Foi42.tinypic.com%2Fdotdg6.jpg&hash=58e3162ee3425f4b4e9fa10b0496e1fb5675a4f8)

Did anyone else have this? I had totally forgotten about it, but seeing it now made me remember how I assembled it and used to play with it with the rest of the Jurassic Park toys I had, without ever painting it. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 04, 2012, 05:02:33 PM
That looks awesome! :D Reminds me of a JP T-Rex that I got when I was younger. It was small, and had to be painted. I was too young to do it myself, so my dad did. Its actually still up on my shelf :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 04, 2012, 05:04:02 PM
That looks pretty cool. I never had a JP model kit sadly. Just the action figures. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Mar 04, 2012, 05:23:17 PM
Quote from: Laufey on Mar 04, 2012, 05:00:51 PM
A few days ago, I was looking through some old photos from Christmas '93 or '94. when I saw that this was amongst the gifts I received that year.

http://oi42.tinypic.com/dotdg6.jpg

Did anyone else have this? I had totally forgotten about it, but seeing it now made me remember how I assembled it and used to play with it with the rest of the Jurassic Park toys I had, without ever painting it. :laugh:

Oh man! I remember having that! I'm pretty sure I broke the head off messing around with it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bad Replicant on Mar 04, 2012, 09:33:03 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Mar 04, 2012, 09:48:36 AM
More goodness:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDUILhtdoTw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDUILhtdoTw#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hyfy8rrfOkM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hyfy8rrfOkM#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2xy6jl52WM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2xy6jl52WM#ws)

Faaaaan-tastic.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1112.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk489%2FWalkEvilTalk%2FPicture9-6.png&hash=8af2adeca1e5d45cb9d694c20a7f628e4dd81a88) Un-real!

I would sell my grandmother for all the test videos they've got in the vault. I ain't even jokin'.

Quote from: Laufey on Mar 04, 2012, 05:00:51 PM
A few days ago, I was looking through some old photos from Christmas '93 or '94. when I saw that this was amongst the gifts I received that year.

http://oi42.tinypic.com/dotdg6.jpg

Did anyone else have this? I had totally forgotten about it, but seeing it now made me remember how I assembled it and used to play with it with the rest of the Jurassic Park toys I had, without ever painting it. :laugh:
Never had one, but I remember seeing these in Toys R Us around the time the movie was released. Always wanted the Raptor kit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 05, 2012, 01:27:38 AM
Quote from: Laufey on Mar 04, 2012, 05:00:51 PM
A few days ago, I was looking through some old photos from Christmas '93 or '94. when I saw that this was amongst the gifts I received that year.

http://oi42.tinypic.com/dotdg6.jpg

Did anyone else have this? I had totally forgotten about it, but seeing it now made me remember how I assembled it and used to play with it with the rest of the Jurassic Park toys I had, without ever painting it. :laugh:

Zdenek Burian. I'd recognize that anywhere 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 05, 2012, 03:57:05 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Mar 04, 2012, 09:48:36 AM
Quote from: Bad Replicant on Mar 02, 2012, 02:50:24 PM
Nice bit of new T-Rex rehearsal footage from the first film, courtesy of the Stan Winston School of Character Arts:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=B4J9TBlFxAg# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=B4J9TBlFxAg#)
Happy I went back a few pages to see this... incredible. It's movement is so fluid and it's presence is so intimidating. I'd be genuinely scared of that shit.

More goodness:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDUILhtdoTw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDUILhtdoTw#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hyfy8rrfOkM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hyfy8rrfOkM#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2xy6jl52WM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2xy6jl52WM#ws)

Faaaaan-tastic.

Incredible.  This is why I always thought dinosaurs were real when I was little.  I would LOVE to work there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xan21 on Mar 07, 2012, 05:59:42 PM
Yes I made those, more

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc00.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2Fi%2F2011%2F220%2Fc%2Ff%2Fjurassic_park_remake_sketch_2_by_xandervanduijvenbode-d45twcg.jpg&hash=8c9c77146757d6551db82e3496c22532963bb9bd)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth04.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2011%2F220%2F9%2F8%2Fjurassic_park_remake_sketch_4_by_xandervanduijvenbode-d45twpo.jpg&hash=8ed8aebe79bc47c735fad30349a98721921f1d82)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc04.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2Fi%2F2011%2F220%2F8%2F6%2Fjurassic_park_remake_artwork_by_xandervanduijvenbode-d45tw0p.jpg&hash=f4f80eeacd52dcaa258a6c81d0378f4c9f530e9e)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Mar 07, 2012, 06:23:37 PM
Amazing work, man. That last one with the Raptors is f**king fantastic. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 07, 2012, 07:23:54 PM
*le sigh* why couldn't the films have that kind of action?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Mar 15, 2012, 11:22:19 PM
Jurassic Park will get a 3D release on July 19th, 2013.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=56420 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=56420)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenomrph on Mar 15, 2012, 11:22:54 PM
Yessssss
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on Mar 16, 2012, 12:02:47 AM
Quote from: Laufey on Mar 15, 2012, 11:22:19 PM
Jurassic Park will get a 3D release on July 19th, 2013.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=56420 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=56420)

About damn time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on Mar 16, 2012, 12:18:42 AM
Quote from: Laufey on Mar 15, 2012, 11:22:19 PM
Jurassic Park will get a 3D release on July 19th, 2013.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=56420 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=56420)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3ALwKeSEYs#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3ALwKeSEYs#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 16, 2012, 01:10:10 AM
I had a lot of JP toys when I was younger and do wish that I still had them. I knew that they would re-release Jurassic Park in 3D and now I can't wait. I only saw The Lost World: Jurassic Park and Jurassic Park III in theaters.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenomrph on Mar 16, 2012, 01:46:10 AM
I still have all my old JP stuff in a box. I still love them, I have a lot of fond memories of messing with them as a kid. This raptor was always the best, from the Lost World toyline:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FLgRvP.jpg&hash=1a0477033288ea249e52fab77e97619fbdc19359)

He's missing an eye and he's covered in scars and claw-marks and shit, and his tail is sculpted as being broken and having healed improperly. It's clear that he's seen some shit. (https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.somethingawful.com%2Fforumsystem%2Femoticons%2Femot-black101.gif&hash=b37991e1a9c3ca5bfbf54a3b2e6b16646eb250ec)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: coolbreeze on Mar 16, 2012, 03:43:49 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 07, 2012, 07:23:54 PM
*le sigh* why couldn't the films have that kind of action?

That's the only thing I would change about JP. More dino on dino violence.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 16, 2012, 05:10:14 AM
I wonder if the 3D re-release will help Jurassic Park IV be made? My guess is that Universal will pick a 2014 release date for Jurassic Park 4 soon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Kol on Mar 16, 2012, 11:43:02 AM
Quote from: coolbreeze on Mar 16, 2012, 03:43:49 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 07, 2012, 07:23:54 PM
*le sigh* why couldn't the films have that kind of action?

That's the only thing I would change about JP. More dino on dino violence.

and some people shooting some dino's to death. i mean when you have the opportunity, why not?
i like the attempts of muldoon and eddie carr, but they obviously failed  :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: coolbreeze on Mar 16, 2012, 11:46:15 AM
Quote from: Kol on Mar 16, 2012, 11:43:02 AM
Quote from: coolbreeze on Mar 16, 2012, 03:43:49 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 07, 2012, 07:23:54 PM
*le sigh* why couldn't the films have that kind of action?

That's the only thing I would change about JP. More dino on dino violence.

and some people shooting some dino's to death. i mean when you have the opportunity, why not?
i like the attempts of muldoon and eddie carr, but they obviously failed  :'(

I would of liked to of seen Muldoon bag at least one Raptor before going out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Kol on Mar 16, 2012, 11:50:00 AM
Quote from: coolbreeze on Mar 16, 2012, 11:46:15 AM
Quote from: Kol on Mar 16, 2012, 11:43:02 AM
Quote from: coolbreeze on Mar 16, 2012, 03:43:49 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 07, 2012, 07:23:54 PM
*le sigh* why couldn't the films have that kind of action?

That's the only thing I would change about JP. More dino on dino violence.

and some people shooting some dino's to death. i mean when you have the opportunity, why not?
i like the attempts of muldoon and eddie carr, but they obviously failed  :'(

I would of liked to of seen Muldoon bag at least one Raptor before going out.

and i would've liked, when eddie killed one t-rex off, before he dies.  :'(

those movies are family friendly stuff and directed by steven spielberg, so it's no surprise, we see those animals unharm, but the people get killing off. lölz.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: EEV-2501 on Mar 16, 2012, 12:16:46 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Mar 16, 2012, 05:10:14 AM
I wonder if the 3D re-release will help Jurassic Park IV be made? My guess is that Universal will pick a 2014 release date for Jurassic Park 4 soon.

The only things I expect from this 3D release.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 16, 2012, 04:23:55 PM
Quote from: Laufey on Mar 15, 2012, 11:22:19 PM
Jurassic Park will get a 3D release on July 19th, 2013.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=56420 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=56420)

Arrrggghhh, 3-D..... :P

I was kinda hoping JPIV would make it for the 20th anniversary.  Guess not... :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xan21 on Mar 16, 2012, 04:31:11 PM
Eventhough 3D gives me headache, I will go see one of the best movies ever in cinema again!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 16, 2012, 04:33:01 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on Mar 16, 2012, 04:31:11 PM
Eventhough 3D gives me headache, I will go see one of the best movies ever in cinema again!

I will do this for the same reason too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Never say no to Panda! on Mar 16, 2012, 04:49:52 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FJPIYk.gif&hash=5461a1fef631271fe91aaa061b141c4b0937c10e)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 16, 2012, 05:05:00 PM
All these 3-D posters lately!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Mar 16, 2012, 05:18:53 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 16, 2012, 05:05:00 PM
All these 3-D posters lately!

The Jurassic Park poster have been around for a long time though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 16, 2012, 05:42:33 PM
Quote from: Laufey on Mar 16, 2012, 05:18:53 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 16, 2012, 05:05:00 PM
All these 3-D posters lately!

The Jurassic Park poster have been around for a long time though.

I had a feeling someone was going to write that.  I know  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: EEV-2501 on Mar 16, 2012, 05:49:17 PM
Quote from: Never say no to Panda! on Mar 16, 2012, 04:49:52 PM
http://i.imgur.com/JPIYk.gif
Awesome. First time I saw something like this. But If I watch It for too long I think I'm gonna have an epileptic crisis.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 16, 2012, 06:25:18 PM
Quote from: Never say no to Panda! on Mar 16, 2012, 04:49:52 PM
http://i.imgur.com/JPIYk.gif

Awesome. I remember that coming with the VHS tape of The Lost World when it was released on home video. God I suddenly feel old.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 16, 2012, 06:36:32 PM
I remember when I had image on my VHS cover of the movie when I got it back in 1997. Hard to believe that was nearly 15 years ago.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 16, 2012, 08:31:33 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Mar 16, 2012, 06:36:32 PM
I remember when I had image on my VHS cover of the movie when I got it back in 1997. Hard to believe that was nearly 15 years ago.

Yes, yes it is.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 16, 2012, 10:12:40 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Mar 16, 2012, 06:36:32 PM
I remember when I had image on my VHS cover of the movie when I got it back in 1997. Hard to believe that was nearly 15 years ago.

Yeah, the same time when I had a chance to see the film in theatres but didn't because JP shit scared me as a kid. So pathetic.

Quote from: Laufey on Mar 15, 2012, 11:22:19 PM
Jurassic Park will get a 3D release on July 19th, 2013.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=56420 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=56420)

I just came :')
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Mar 17, 2012, 01:20:12 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Mar 16, 2012, 06:25:18 PM
Quote from: Never say no to Panda! on Mar 16, 2012, 04:49:52 PM
http://i.imgur.com/JPIYk.gif

Awesome. I remember that coming with the VHS tape of The Lost World when it was released on home video. God I suddenly feel old.
Dude, I'm 18 and I remember the same thing clear as day; don't you gimme that "I'mma old maaaan" shit!  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 17, 2012, 01:30:12 AM
It just seems like just yesterday I was buying VHS tapes instead of DVDs and Blu-rays. I had that movie when I was seven years old – it's been 15 years. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Mar 17, 2012, 02:44:50 AM
I cannot wait to see Jurassic Park in 3D next year. I could care less that it's in 3D, but I didn't grow up seeing it in the theaters. I would be a dream come true to finally see it on the big screen.

If it does well in theaters, they may be more motivated to make JPIV.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 17, 2012, 03:01:03 AM
I'm almost 21 and I still remember watching the first movie on VHS when I was nearly three years old. JP, Bambi, Godzilla: King of the Monsters (1954) and Land before Time are one my earilest movie memories.

Edit: Fix typo. Can't believe that I didn't see it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xan21 on Mar 17, 2012, 11:29:10 PM
Well if they are going to rerelease it why not add the deleted scenes into the movie (the baby trike scene)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kastner-delago.com%2Fcms%2Fimages%2FGalleryLarge%2Fgallery%2F54_Jurassic%2520Park_sculpture_1.jpg&hash=352feae6e9e0cf2654bde09af0b92c8a4815bf3c)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fp2.la-img.com%2F930%2F16511%2F5467819_1_l.jpg&hash=4bfec7e4b965c5e1805fb3c7ea3fbc26db5350d6)

This following video also shows them shooting some different scenes

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irGKvBlrYPI# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irGKvBlrYPI#)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.alyssamartin.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F12%2Ftumblr_lvitacUvX51qzamioo1_500.jpg&hash=b0a1a1bce666bc6bd2e5f3b75d3ad7cf1718bb31)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Mar 18, 2012, 12:16:00 AM
I don't believe that the baby trike scene was ever fully filmed, so I don't think that it's possible.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xan21 on Mar 18, 2012, 12:19:42 AM
Ow I thought it was, too bad
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Mar 18, 2012, 12:24:40 AM
In fact, the only deleted scenes in the entire series to be seen at all are boardroom scene and the bar fight scene in TLW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Mar 20, 2012, 01:16:17 AM
I just read The Lost World again. I haven't read it since it was released over here in '95 or '96, but it still holds up very well. It moves on a slower pace than the movie and there are of course a lot of differences. But in the end, I think I prefer this to the movie. And I definitely prefer the book's take on Sarah Harding than the movie's.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 20, 2012, 04:33:18 AM
I feel like the only person who didn't much care for The Lost World novel. :-\ One of two Crichton books that I didn't like (the other being State of Fear, which was basically Crichton telling everyone how stupid we are for believing the evidence for climate change over the course of 600 pages).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 20, 2012, 04:37:30 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Mar 20, 2012, 04:33:18 AM
I feel like the only person who didn't much care for The Lost World novel. :-\ One of two Crichton books that I didn't like (the other being State of Fear, which was basically Crichton telling everyone how stupid we are for believing the evidence for climate change over the course of 600 pages).

Yeah, State of Fear felt like Crichton's own personal soapbox to preach what he thought on the issue of climate change, I agree with you, I felt State of Fear was a stinker. And, though I found The Lost World novel to be interesting, my heart lies with the film. Too many memories of the flick growing up to let go of.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 20, 2012, 04:22:16 PM
The Lost World novel's characteristic that sets its pacing apart from its predecessor is that Malcolm spends much more time in monologues or long dialogues. I think one of them covers up an entire page or two. Perhaps that's what makes people bored when reading it. I wasn't, to be honest.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Kol on Mar 20, 2012, 05:02:05 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Mar 20, 2012, 04:22:16 PM
I wasn't, to be honest.

i wasn't bored either.  ;)

and yeah, it's not about being "entertained" in every second.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Mar 20, 2012, 05:03:51 PM
I think the discussions in The Lost World were very interesting, especially since they were building up to that big reveal at the end (on how this "Lost World" was flawed).

Also, that bike chase with the Raptor would have been awesome to see on screen. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Mar 20, 2012, 05:25:58 PM
I love the novel and the film. The novel is a slow burn. I think it does an amazing job of building up tension over the first two thirds of the book, then everything comes crashing down and the last third of the book is nonstop action and death. Freakin love it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 20, 2012, 06:37:21 PM
Quote from: Laufey on Mar 20, 2012, 05:03:51 PM
Also, that bike chase with the Raptor would have been awesome to see on screen. :)
Thorne and Levine on a Motorcycle chased by a Tyrannosaurus.
That is all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 20, 2012, 07:27:19 PM
Too bad that there was a never a JP3 novel. I wonder what Crichton version of JP3 would have been like?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: stephen on Mar 20, 2012, 10:23:16 PM
Actually The Lost World is the only sequel Crichton has written.  I remember seeing a quote from him regarding it and the feeling I got was that he didn't really overly enjoy the experience.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Mar 21, 2012, 12:30:41 AM
The problem I have with The Lost World novel is that it's message is the opposite of the first novel. Jurassic Park: "Life finds a way." The Lost World: "These dinosaurs are all doomed to go extinct again."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 21, 2012, 03:27:50 PM
TLW was about life finding a way. Hammond explicitly says so at the end. I thought that made it obvious.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Mar 21, 2012, 08:07:52 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 21, 2012, 03:27:50 PM
TLW was about life finding a way. Hammond explicitly says so at the end. I thought that made it obvious.

The Novel. Not the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 21, 2012, 08:08:37 PM
I think life will find a way in the novel too, btw.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: KNIGHT on Mar 21, 2012, 09:10:22 PM
It wasn't so much "The dinosaurs were all doomed" as it was "It wasn't a perfect lost world"

The environment of not only the creation of the dinosaurs, the size of the island, and what they had been fed all forced them to adapt. They weren't likely acting like real dinosaurs did, thus it wasn't a "lost world".

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: mastermoon on Mar 22, 2012, 02:39:24 AM
Both Jurassic Park 3 and the most recent Jurassic Park 4 never began as novels.

Now the movie "Jurassic Park: The Lost World" is very loosly based on the novel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 22, 2012, 01:23:18 PM
Quote from: Jayden the Omnipotent on Mar 21, 2012, 09:10:22 PM
It wasn't so much "The dinosaurs were all doomed" as it was "It wasn't a perfect lost world"

The environment of not only the creation of the dinosaurs, the size of the island, and what they had been fed all forced them to adapt. They weren't likely acting like real dinosaurs did, thus it wasn't a "lost world".

Yeah, I didn't think raptors could climb a metal cage a la Aliens.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Mar 25, 2012, 11:27:38 PM
I'm just gonna leave this here so I can get a second opinion from people who've read the book.

http://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=38011.msg1312059#msg1312059 (http://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=38011.msg1312059#msg1312059)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: KNIGHT on Mar 26, 2012, 12:17:41 AM
Most of those actors look more like what I pictured reading the book, and seem like they would work great.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 26, 2012, 12:55:25 AM
Quote from: Laufey on Mar 25, 2012, 11:27:38 PM
I'm just gonna leave this here so I can get a second opinion from people who've read the book.

http://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=38011.msg1312059#msg1312059 (http://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=38011.msg1312059#msg1312059)

A Christen Bale interpretation of Ian Malcolm is something I would kill to see.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 26, 2012, 01:23:50 AM
You cannot replace The Goldblum. He is paramount by default.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 26, 2012, 01:24:57 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 26, 2012, 01:23:50 AM
You cannot replace The Goldblum. He is paramount by default.

You are trashin' my Chaos Theory!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 26, 2012, 01:27:03 AM
First Blood, the kind of theory you attempting to propagate is um, is not valid. If there's one thing that the history of film has taught us, it's that important and beloved actors cannot simply be replaced at will. Fans crash through studio walls violently, even dangerously but uh...

Well there it is.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 26, 2012, 02:56:10 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Mar 26, 2012, 12:55:25 AM
Quote from: Laufey on Mar 25, 2012, 11:27:38 PM
I'm just gonna leave this here so I can get a second opinion from people who've read the book.

http://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=38011.msg1312059#msg1312059 (http://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=38011.msg1312059#msg1312059)

A Christen Bale interpretation of Ian Malcolm is something I would kill to see.

How about Will Ferrell?  Only then would be the time that I wished the Rex ate Malcolm before snacking on the lawyer.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Mar 26, 2012, 06:35:38 AM
I hate to be that guy, but anyone else think Robert Downey Jr. would make a decent Malcolm? It just kinda popped in my head while watching Iron Man. I think if he took it in a different direction than he did with Stark then he could really make it his own.

And I always pictured Harrison Ford as Thorne whenever I read the book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DJ Pu$$yface on Mar 26, 2012, 07:25:51 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 26, 2012, 02:56:10 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Mar 26, 2012, 12:55:25 AM
Quote from: Laufey on Mar 25, 2012, 11:27:38 PM
I'm just gonna leave this here so I can get a second opinion from people who've read the book.

http://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=38011.msg1312059#msg1312059 (http://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=38011.msg1312059#msg1312059)

A Christen Bale interpretation of Ian Malcolm is something I would kill to see.

How about Will Ferrell?

No. NO.

Quote from: Remonster on Mar 26, 2012, 06:35:38 AM
I hate to be that guy, but anyone else think Robert Downey Jr. would make a decent Malcolm? It just kinda popped in my head while watching Iron Man. I think if he took it in a different direction than he did with Stark then he could really make it his own.

I would kill to see that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 26, 2012, 01:37:39 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Mar 26, 2012, 06:35:38 AM
I hate to be that guy, but anyone else think Robert Downey Jr. would make a decent Malcolm? It just kinda popped in my head while watching Iron Man. I think if he took it in a different direction than he did with Stark then he could really make it his own.

RDJ, for sure. He has the sarcastic tone Malcolm needs but he's too old to play the role if the film was remade.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: toyartist on Mar 26, 2012, 02:41:31 PM
I wanna know why Sam Neil isn't coming back? Its not like he has a million film projects going on and he is important to the Jurassic series.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Mar 26, 2012, 03:22:42 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 26, 2012, 01:37:39 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Mar 26, 2012, 06:35:38 AM
I hate to be that guy, but anyone else think Robert Downey Jr. would make a decent Malcolm? It just kinda popped in my head while watching Iron Man. I think if he took it in a different direction than he did with Stark then he could really make it his own.

RDJ, for sure. He has the sarcastic tone Malcolm needs but he's too old to play the role if the film was remade.

I don't think its too late. They could play RDJ as younger than he actually is.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: AvatarIII on Mar 26, 2012, 03:23:27 PM
He's in Alcatraz, maybe he just doesn't have enough time to be filming a TV serial and a blockbuster movie.

also RDJ is 13 years younger than Goldblum, and it's been 19 years since JP, that's only a 6 year discrepancy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Kol on Mar 26, 2012, 03:26:02 PM
nobody will do a remake of that movie, so chill.

Quote from: toyartist on Mar 26, 2012, 02:41:31 PM
I wanna know why Sam Neil isn't coming back? Its not like he has a million film projects going on and he is important to the Jurassic series.

yeah, that's a good question!
we all loved dr. grant.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 26, 2012, 04:11:02 PM
Quote from: toyartist on Mar 26, 2012, 02:41:31 PM
I wanna know why Sam Neil isn't coming back? Its not like he has a million film projects going on and he is important to the Jurassic series.

I read a article in which Sam expressed interest in returning since all this recent activity was going on, as long as the studio wanted him, he would be hapy to come back.  I just need to find that quote now....
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Mar 26, 2012, 07:54:52 PM
As good as Niel is as Grant, I can't see any logical reason he'd be in another sequel. JP3's was pushing it as it was.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Mar 27, 2012, 01:17:31 AM
Sam Neill doesn't want to be in a fourth film becuase he knows that if came up with some plot where Grant would return, it would be a terrible movie. He's right to think so.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 27, 2012, 02:19:50 AM
If I remember correctly, he said he would be open to doing more on the new JP III retrospective video, from the Blu-ray release.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Mar 27, 2012, 11:00:06 AM
If Grant is back, make it a small role. I think he's had enough dino-adventures in his lifetime. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Kol on Mar 27, 2012, 03:28:17 PM
grant & malcolm reunited for a JP IV? that would been awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 27, 2012, 08:09:31 PM
Quote from: evolution_rex on Mar 27, 2012, 01:17:31 AM
Sam Neill doesn't want to be in a fourth film becuase he knows that if came up with some plot where Grant would return, it would be a terrible movie. He's right to think so.

When did he say that?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 28, 2012, 01:24:44 AM
The only thing for the Jurassic Park 3D release that it will finally make the 4th film finally happen. I won't be surprise if they didn't add a 4 in the title since most people don't like sequels with numbers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Rick Grimes on Mar 28, 2012, 01:43:59 AM
Here's my theory: Having them release Jurassic Park in 3D, and it become successful in theaters they would plan to make a fourth JP movie in 3D. George Lucas did it with the newly remodeled Star Tours 3D and the guest reception at Disney was great for the ride so he went on to release the films in 3D.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Mar 28, 2012, 02:18:16 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 27, 2012, 08:09:31 PM
Quote from: evolution_rex on Mar 27, 2012, 01:17:31 AM
Sam Neill doesn't want to be in a fourth film becuase he knows that if came up with some plot where Grant would return, it would be a terrible movie. He's right to think so.

When did he say that?
Never said it, but I'm hoping so. due to the fact that he's said that he would never be in a fourth film. If I remember correctly, he said something like "The only way I would in JPIV is if they can some how invent a time machine and bring back Michael Crichton and Stan Winston." Something along those lines.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Rick Grimes on Mar 28, 2012, 02:30:07 AM
Instead of trying to develop a fourth film, why don't they just go the usual Hollywood route these days and re-boot the franchise? You know, clean the slate and start over new with fresh ingredients and not recycled ideas.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 28, 2012, 03:13:57 AM
Cause we won't allow it.  Why didn't they just reboot Indiana Jones back in '08?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Mar 28, 2012, 03:21:39 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 28, 2012, 03:13:57 AM
Cause we won't allow it.  Why didn't they just reboot Indiana Jones back in '08?

Oh, God no. Those films didn't need to be rebooted. They were right doing a sequel. It's how they went about doing it which leaves a bad taste in some peoples mouths.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: KNIGHT on Mar 28, 2012, 03:22:50 AM
Personally, I would prefer a reboot of Jurassic Park... if it were good. The original movie was good, but it could have been done better in some regards. Some scenes that made the book memorable for me were just scrapped from the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Rick Grimes on Mar 28, 2012, 12:38:23 PM
Quote from: Jayden the Omnipotent on Mar 28, 2012, 03:22:50 AM
Some scenes that made the book memorable for me were just scrapped from the movie.

This. I read the book over the summer and couldn't believe the huge amount of material they left out of the movie. For god's sake you can make a fourth film out of everything they cut out; of course they incorporated some stuff into Jurassic Park III (river boat scenes, pteranodons, etc).

Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 28, 2012, 03:13:57 AM
Cause we won't allow it.

Joe Johnson mentioned in an interview that having a Jurassic Park 4 would start a new trilogy. Would you rather have sequel and fear it might turn into another Crystal Skull, or have a start of a new trilogy consisting of Jurassic Park 4,5,6, or get the right director (J.J. Abrams) to film a re-boot? It's a tough question because they're so many directions this film can take.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Kol on Mar 28, 2012, 12:41:09 PM
i don't care if they do a pre-quel, a reboot, a sequel or a spin-off or with what ever they come with. i just want another jurassic park movie  :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 28, 2012, 01:59:08 PM
Quote from: Kol on Mar 28, 2012, 12:41:09 PM
i don't care if they do a pre-quel, a reboot, a sequel or a spin-off or with what ever they come with. i just want another jurassic park movie  :'(

Yeah.  I would just like to see some original characters return.  Maybe they just can't get enough of the Jurassic rush, and NEED to go back.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 28, 2012, 05:10:09 PM
There's no demand for dinosaurs. That's what it boils down to. JP III IMO, killed whatever interest the public had. Zombies are the order of the day.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DJ Pu$$yface on Mar 28, 2012, 08:45:50 PM
I'm sure kids would be thrilled for another.

I mean, what kid doesn't Dinosaurs?  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 28, 2012, 09:40:57 PM
Over use of generic CGI has killed all wonders of film making. 

Bringing animatronics back will re-spark imagination.

Especially animatronic dinosaurs.

Especially Jurassic Park animatronic dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Rick Grimes on Mar 28, 2012, 10:22:10 PM
We just want a goddamn Jurassic Park movie with action and freaking dinosaurs man, is that too much to ask for?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 28, 2012, 10:48:52 PM
Quote from: DJ Pu$$yface on Mar 28, 2012, 08:45:50 PM
I'm sure kids would be thrilled for another.

I mean, what kid doesn't Dinosaurs?  :laugh:

Kids don't represent a customer base worth spending millions on for one movie. Especially if that film is from a franchise that isn't doing so well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: stephen on Mar 29, 2012, 12:11:30 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 28, 2012, 10:48:52 PM
Quote from: DJ Pu$$yface on Mar 28, 2012, 08:45:50 PM

Kids don't represent a customer base worth spending millions on for one movie. Especially if that film is from a franchise that isn't doing so well.

Are you kidding - the first film was aimed at kids.  It's not just about the film, its about the merchandise.  And Jurassic Park had a shitload of merchandise.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 29, 2012, 02:43:34 AM
Kids weren't the primary audience. That was a film for mature audiences, I should've thought that was obvious. JP had a shitload of merchandise. It's not coming out with the same frequency it did when the films were still popular.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: stephen on Mar 29, 2012, 03:04:35 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 29, 2012, 02:43:34 AM
Kids weren't the primary audience. That was a film for mature audiences, I should've thought that was obvious. JP had a shitload of merchandise. It's not coming out with the same frequency it did when the films were still popular.

Actually I would have thought it was obvious the other way around.  If you've read the book you would know the book is definitly for mature readers while the movie dumbed it right down for the kids.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 29, 2012, 03:09:37 AM
Not sure I'd label people being eaten alive being dumbed down for kids. I agree the book was much more violent but the film wasn't exactly tame.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: stephen on Mar 29, 2012, 03:12:31 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 29, 2012, 03:09:37 AM
Not sure I'd label people being eaten alive being dumbed down for kids. I agree the book was much more violent but the film wasn't exactly tame.

Doesn't mean that it wasn't for kids.  I think it was squarely aimed at the younger audience.  They aimed for and got a PG rating for that reason.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 29, 2012, 03:16:59 AM
Well in any case, kids love dinosaurs yes, but I don't think Universal will agree to a fourth film based on that alone. Another Land Before Time has greater chances of being made.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: stephen on Mar 29, 2012, 03:20:37 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 29, 2012, 03:16:59 AM
Well in any case, kids love dinosaurs yes, but I don't think Universal will agree to a fourth film based on that alone. Another Land Before Time has greater chances of being made.

Perhaps.

But I certainly think that spending millions on a movie aimed at kids works very well for studios - especially if you couple the box office takings with the merchandising.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: KNIGHT on Mar 29, 2012, 03:44:04 AM
Imagine them money they would get from the toys alone. I know a lot of people still collect the old Jurassic park toys (Me included, when I can find them.)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 29, 2012, 03:46:01 PM
Quote from: Jayden the Omnipotent on Mar 29, 2012, 03:44:04 AM
Imagine them money they would get from the toys alone. I know a lot of people still collect the old Jurassic park toys (Me included, when I can find them.)

I recently got the research trailer from TLW, as well as the Mercedes remote control car.  I cut the wire since the battery pack was completely weathered.  Now it makes for an awesome model.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 29, 2012, 04:03:16 PM
Kids love Dinosaurs, seeing that I was really into them as a kid. Marketing Jurassic Park to kids was a smart choice, seeing that Mcdonalds did happy meal toys for the movie at the time as well. I'm not sure what are kids are into these days, but I'm pretty sure kids will still a Jurassic Park 4.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 29, 2012, 04:06:42 PM
Justin Bieber, Jersey Shore, and Twilight would be good places to start.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: KNIGHT on Mar 29, 2012, 09:43:13 PM
The term was "Kids", not "Stereotypical twelve year old girls"

I'd say there's still a fascination from kids on the subject of dinosaurs. Sure, some modern stories and creatures, (like zombies, vampires, and Justin Beiber) might interest them, but nothing evokes the same sort of awe in a child as a 20 ton dinosaur.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Rick Grimes on Mar 29, 2012, 09:57:22 PM
It's not about the dinosaurs; It's about having a great story, the dinos are just salt on the fries.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 29, 2012, 10:02:29 PM
No, it's about the dinosaurs. Since when do kids, if they are the primary audience, care about a well-put together story?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Rick Grimes on Mar 29, 2012, 10:41:29 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 29, 2012, 10:02:29 PM
No, it's about the dinosaurs. Since when do kids, if they are the primary audience, care about a well-put together story?

Did you go see Jurassic Park just "for the dinosaurs?" no, you probably didn't, since you went to see the film because of the book you might have read and it had a good story to it. And like most of us, we went because of the CGI effects. Which partly is due to the dinosaurs. But none of that matters. They will market the film showing us dino rampage and action just like how The Avenger's plasters Iron Man in front of all of their posters and trailers. Wanna know why? Because that;s the target audience demographic. People love Iron man, so why not have his character shown more in the trailers, little kids love to play with dinosaurs so why not show bunch of T-Rexes tearing apart a vehicle. It's simple as that. Besides, grown ups like us, see movies because of the story plot. It's all in the marketing man, all about the marketing....
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Kol on Mar 29, 2012, 10:47:29 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Mar 29, 2012, 10:41:29 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 29, 2012, 10:02:29 PM
No, it's about the dinosaurs. Since when do kids, if they are the primary audience, care about a well-put together story?

Did you go see Jurassic Park just "for the dinosaurs?" no, you probably didn't, since you went to see the film because of the book you might have read and it had a good story to it. And like most of us, we went because of the CGI effects. Which partly is due to the dinosaurs. But none of that matters. They will market the film showing us dino rampage and action just like how The Avenger's plasters Iron Man in front of all of their posters and trailers. Wanna know why? Because that;s the target audience demographic. People love Iron man, so why not have his character shown more in the trailers, little kids love to play with dinosaurs so why not show bunch of T-Rexes tearing apart a vehicle. It's simple as that. Besides, grown ups like us, see movies because of the story plot. It's all in the marketing man, all about the marketing....

ähm, in '93 i just were 5 years old & the only reason i wanted to watch jurassic park was of the dinosaurs.
now, almost 20 years later, i just want do see another dinosaur movie. if jurassic park 4 won't show in the next 2-3 years i don't mind seeing another dino-movie taking the throne from JP away.

a dino crisis movie would just fill the emptiness in my heart for several reasons.

ps: i agree that the movie(s) were simplified (deformed) reflections of the novels.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Rick Grimes on Mar 29, 2012, 10:55:18 PM
Quote from: Kol on Mar 29, 2012, 10:47:29 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Mar 29, 2012, 10:41:29 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 29, 2012, 10:02:29 PM
No, it's about the dinosaurs. Since when do kids, if they are the primary audience, care about a well-put together story?

Did you go see Jurassic Park just "for the dinosaurs?" no, you probably didn't, since you went to see the film because of the book you might have read and it had a good story to it. And like most of us, we went because of the CGI effects. Which partly is due to the dinosaurs. But none of that matters. They will market the film showing us dino rampage and action just like how The Avenger's plasters Iron Man in front of all of their posters and trailers. Wanna know why? Because that;s the target audience demographic. People love Iron man, so why not have his character shown more in the trailers, little kids love to play with dinosaurs so why not show bunch of T-Rexes tearing apart a vehicle. It's simple as that. Besides, grown ups like us, see movies because of the story plot. It's all in the marketing man, all about the marketing....

ähm, in '93 i just were 5 years old & the only reason i wanted to watch jurassic park was of the dinosaurs.
now, almost 20 years later, i just want do see another dinosaur movie. if jurassic park 4 won't show in the next 2-3 years i don't mind seeing another dino-movie taking the throne from JP away.

a dino crisis movie would just fill the emptiness in my heart for several reasons.

ps: i agree that the movie(s) were simplified (deformed) reflections of the novels.

I was still in my mothers womb at the time of it's release. And once I saw it, my life was all dinosaurs. i heard they were making a Walking with Dinosaurs movie that would be some type of "mockumentary" from 20th Century FOX set for release in October 2013. So in the mean time while we wait for another JP movie, that'll have to do for now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Mar 30, 2012, 03:16:55 AM
Jurassic Park is about dinosaurs. Is it something more? Very much yes, but it wouldn't be near as popular if they were cloning giant rodents or some shit like that. The dinosaurs are the reason people went to see the movie. Was the trailer filled with the characters discussing the ethics of cloning an extinct species? Of course not, it was packed full of dinosaurs. It will always be known for being about dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 30, 2012, 05:35:08 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Mar 29, 2012, 10:41:29 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 29, 2012, 10:02:29 PM
No, it's about the dinosaurs. Since when do kids, if they are the primary audience, care about a well-put together story?

Did you go see Jurassic Park just "for the dinosaurs?" no, you probably didn't, since you went to see the film because of the book you might have read and it had a good story to it. And like most of us, we went because of the CGI effects. Which partly is due to the dinosaurs. But none of that matters. They will market the film showing us dino rampage and action just like how The Avenger's plasters Iron Man in front of all of their posters and trailers. Wanna know why? Because that;s the target audience demographic. People love Iron man, so why not have his character shown more in the trailers, little kids love to play with dinosaurs so why not show bunch of T-Rexes tearing apart a vehicle. It's simple as that. Besides, grown ups like us, see movies because of the story plot. It's all in the marketing man, all about the marketing....

In 1993, I was six years old. You think the story meant anything at all to me? Yes, I saw it just for the dinosaurs. That was the only reason and to some degree, still is. I can appreciate the story now as an adult but it's the dinosaurs that draw me in.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xan21 on Mar 30, 2012, 06:18:59 PM
Why do people always want the same actors back in these movies, a returning pop star isnt good either (Bruce Springsteen, Aerosmith) they just become parodies of themselves eventually, which is not cool! It needs to open up with all new characters, I didn't knew any of the original Jurassic Park actors and they were one by one fantastic but werent in the sequels (well John Williams was great but still Jeff Goldblum and Sam Neill were rather dull in the sequels).

I hope that if 4 comes out, they dont forget epic scenes like these:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.animalpicturesarchive.com%2FArchOLD-6%2F1187273888.jpg&hash=7a045785459237abc480afd096d63567fb03c520)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theshiznit.co.uk%2Fmedia%2FSep2011%2Fjpweek%2Ftriceratops.jpg&hash=076e3789cc2acadf91a0da9abdde33f056ac67b2)

I wouldnt even mind if they sort of remaked it, well the basic plot of a new more grandeur island, there are so many action sequences we can see, and no dinosaurs on the mainland encountering dumb cartoon like people...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 30, 2012, 06:48:30 PM
Because Sam Neill and Jeff Goldblum have wonderful chemistry on-screen together. Plus it's nice to see fan favourites return to work together.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Mar 30, 2012, 07:05:54 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 30, 2012, 06:48:30 PM
Because Sam Neill and Jeff Goldblum have wonderful chemistry on-screen together. Plus it's nice to see fan favourites return to work together.

Agreed. I love the banter between Neill and Goldblum before the Tyrannosaur attack.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 30, 2012, 07:20:55 PM
"What's to be scared about, it's just a little hiccup in the power..."

"I didn't say I was scared."

"... I didn't say you were scared..."

"I know."

;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xan21 on Mar 30, 2012, 08:42:31 PM
Ok but you liked them in the sequels? Ian was a bit boring to me in TLW, well I missed his witty lines and well JP III sucked overall, it was way too corny with the Kirby soap opera storyline.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 30, 2012, 09:02:37 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 30, 2012, 07:20:55 PM
"What's to be scared about, it's just a little hiccup in the power..."

"I didn't say I was scared."

"... I didn't say you were scared..."

"I know."

;D

Love that line.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 30, 2012, 09:28:15 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on Mar 30, 2012, 08:42:31 PM
Ok but you liked them in the sequels? Ian was a bit boring to me in TLW, well I missed his witty lines and well JP III sucked overall, it was way too corny with the Kirby soap opera storyline.

In TLW, yes I did. He was still as sarcastic as ever and JP III, well...lost cause.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Rick Grimes on Mar 30, 2012, 09:33:44 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 30, 2012, 05:35:08 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Mar 29, 2012, 10:41:29 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 29, 2012, 10:02:29 PM
No, it's about the dinosaurs. Since when do kids, if they are the primary audience, care about a well-put together story?

Did you go see Jurassic Park just "for the dinosaurs?" no, you probably didn't, since you went to see the film because of the book you might have read and it had a good story to it. And like most of us, we went because of the CGI effects. Which partly is due to the dinosaurs. But none of that matters. They will market the film showing us dino rampage and action just like how The Avenger's plasters Iron Man in front of all of their posters and trailers. Wanna know why? Because that;s the target audience demographic. People love Iron man, so why not have his character shown more in the trailers, little kids love to play with dinosaurs so why not show bunch of T-Rexes tearing apart a vehicle. It's simple as that. Besides, grown ups like us, see movies because of the story plot. It's all in the marketing man, all about the marketing....

In 1993, I was six years old. You think the story meant anything at all to me? Yes, I saw it just for the dinosaurs. That was the only reason and to some degree, still is. I can appreciate the story now as an adult but it's the dinosaurs that draw me in.

Well there we go, we were all between the ages of 4-8 when we first went to see Jurassic Park because of the dinosaurs now that we all much older we (or I in this case) go see the film for the story, although The Lost Wrold and JP3 had some bad writing in it. But the dino action was good :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Mar 30, 2012, 11:27:40 PM
I love Malcolm in TLW because its him being a total dick to everyone he talks to.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Rick Grimes on Mar 31, 2012, 12:11:27 AM
Quote from: Remonster on Mar 30, 2012, 11:27:40 PM
I love Malcolm in TLW because its him being a total dick to everyone he talks to.

He was the best thing about that film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xenomrph on Mar 31, 2012, 12:17:07 AM
Quote from: Remonster on Mar 30, 2012, 11:27:40 PM
I love Malcolm in TLW because its him being a total dick to everyone he talks to.
He's not just being a dick, he's being a realist. He's speaking from experience. He's literally the audience's mouthpiece, he's saying what the audience is thinking because he already lived through it all before (in the first movie) and he's seeing the new characters make the same mistakes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Rick Grimes on Mar 31, 2012, 12:39:59 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Mar 31, 2012, 12:17:07 AM
Quote from: Remonster on Mar 30, 2012, 11:27:40 PM
I love Malcolm in TLW because its him being a total dick to everyone he talks to.
He's not just being a dick, he's being a realist. He's speaking from experience. He's literally the audience's mouthpiece, he's saying what the audience is thinking because he already lived through it all before (in the first movie) and he's seeing the new characters make the same mistakes.

Wouldn't say he was a dick, but seemed more like a D-Bag to me at times. Although his character in the books was a lot more mature.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 31, 2012, 01:52:42 AM
Being a realist usually means being a douche bag because everyone else around you is stupid :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Rick Grimes on Mar 31, 2012, 02:04:46 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 31, 2012, 01:52:42 AM
Being a realist usually means being a douche bag because everyone else around you is stupid :P

I must be stupid then :P Haha only kidding!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 31, 2012, 03:04:27 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Mar 31, 2012, 12:17:07 AM
Quote from: Remonster on Mar 30, 2012, 11:27:40 PM
I love Malcolm in TLW because its him being a total dick to everyone he talks to.
He's not just being a dick, he's being a realist. He's speaking from experience. He's literally the audience's mouthpiece, he's saying what the audience is thinking because he already lived through it all before (in the first movie) and he's seeing the new characters make the same mistakes.

Aren't we all the same....
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Mar 31, 2012, 01:14:49 PM
What I think works so well in TLW is how Eddie shoots it right back to Malcolm. He doesn't let Malcolm get away with being a d-bag. He's just as sarcastic, and just as willing to throw down.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 01, 2012, 05:35:38 AM
In the movie? I don't remember aside from the quip about the poison dart gun.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 01, 2012, 09:06:02 AM
Don't forget the workshop sequence.

"Ow Ow Ow! Don't do that! You gotta baby it a little bit."
"I'll love it when it works."
"It'll work when you love it."


Poor Eddie. :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 01, 2012, 02:57:47 PM
That's another reason I like the JP movies. The deaths are so brutal but they aren't graphic. Class act.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: severen76 on Apr 01, 2012, 03:34:56 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Apr 01, 2012, 09:06:02 AM
Don't forget the workshop sequence.

"Ow Ow Ow! Don't do that! You gotta baby it a little bit."
"I'll love it when it works."
"It'll work when you love it."


Poor Eddie. :'(

He also says something like "you might actually want to try flicking the switch to 'on' "
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 01, 2012, 09:42:44 PM
Quote from: severen76 on Apr 01, 2012, 03:34:56 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Apr 01, 2012, 09:06:02 AM
Don't forget the workshop sequence.

"Ow Ow Ow! Don't do that! You gotta baby it a little bit."
"I'll love it when it works."
"It'll work when you love it."


Poor Eddie. :'(

He also says something like "you might actually want to try flicking the switch to 'on' "

Yes

Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 01, 2012, 02:57:47 PM
That's another reason I like the JP movies. The deaths are so brutal but they aren't graphic. Class act.

And yes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Apr 10, 2012, 02:23:14 AM
While it's not JP4. It appears that a JP film is being made by an independent film company.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth05.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2012%2F079%2Fa%2Fc%2Fjurassic_park_origins_banner_001_by_giu3232-d4tegn1.jpg&hash=8e24c883fb9b26945b3f4c158b2d4ca7f58b7a42)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc03.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2Fi%2F2012%2F066%2F1%2F5%2Fbaby_rex_male_001_by_giu3232-d4s0cj3.jpg&hash=5356d2b5b9bc67650929e2f455dc647391302bef)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc02.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2Fi%2F2012%2F030%2F4%2F6%2Ftrex_kill_spino_by_giu3232-d4o4zyg.jpg&hash=ccf59bd48975ee4250a3727a3c12bf3383be5905)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc08.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2Ff%2F2012%2F008%2F7%2F5%2Fjp_origins_previz_001_by_giu3232-d4lsdtw.jpg&hash=4154e8a815430297a0f15621597dd63bfccbca47)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth04.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2011%2F362%2F5%2F8%2Fjurassic_park_trex_by_giu3232-d4kjwvm.jpg&hash=23658175fd43e28d4b9442471a49b8eb36451674)
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/s720x720/389209_376176132417296_257949214239989_1208347_364628366_n.jpg)

http://jporigins.com/ (http://jporigins.com/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Apr 10, 2012, 02:31:59 AM
QuoteDid you go see Jurassic Park just "for the dinosaurs?" no, you probably didn't,

:laugh:

Of course I did.  Why would anyone go watch it if not for the dinosaurs?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Apr 10, 2012, 02:34:27 AM
Because Sam Neill is my hero
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Apr 10, 2012, 02:35:08 AM
Pfft - that's just a bonus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Apr 10, 2012, 02:50:17 AM
No, him kicking a Raptor in the face is a bonus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: KNIGHT on Apr 10, 2012, 03:00:13 AM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Apr 10, 2012, 02:23:14 AM

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth04.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2011%2F362%2F5%2F8%2Fjurassic_park_trex_by_giu3232-d4kjwvm.jpg&hash=23658175fd43e28d4b9442471a49b8eb36451674)


Personally, I'm pretty impressed by that CGI.
IassumeitsCGIatleast
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Apr 10, 2012, 03:21:57 AM
The rex on the spino, not so much.  Models look great.  Lighting's off though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Apr 10, 2012, 03:38:05 AM
Plus it reeks of butt hurt fanboys.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Apr 10, 2012, 03:40:05 AM
It's a fan film - why wouldn't it?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Apr 10, 2012, 03:41:30 AM
Touché
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 10, 2012, 04:47:17 AM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Apr 10, 2012, 02:23:14 AM
While it's not JP4. It appears that a JP film is being made by an independent film company.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth05.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2012%2F079%2Fa%2Fc%2Fjurassic_park_origins_banner_001_by_giu3232-d4tegn1.jpg&hash=8e24c883fb9b26945b3f4c158b2d4ca7f58b7a42)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc03.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2Fi%2F2012%2F066%2F1%2F5%2Fbaby_rex_male_001_by_giu3232-d4s0cj3.jpg&hash=5356d2b5b9bc67650929e2f455dc647391302bef)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc02.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2Fi%2F2012%2F030%2F4%2F6%2Ftrex_kill_spino_by_giu3232-d4o4zyg.jpg&hash=ccf59bd48975ee4250a3727a3c12bf3383be5905)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc08.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2Ff%2F2012%2F008%2F7%2F5%2Fjp_origins_previz_001_by_giu3232-d4lsdtw.jpg&hash=4154e8a815430297a0f15621597dd63bfccbca47)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth04.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2011%2F362%2F5%2F8%2Fjurassic_park_trex_by_giu3232-d4kjwvm.jpg&hash=23658175fd43e28d4b9442471a49b8eb36451674)
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/s720x720/389209_376176132417296_257949214239989_1208347_364628366_n.jpg

http://jporigins.com/ (http://jporigins.com/)


Holy shit!  Why didn't I know about this!?

Very impressive  :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ghost Rider on Apr 10, 2012, 01:52:52 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Apr 10, 2012, 02:23:14 AM
While it's not JP4. It appears that a JP film is being made by an independent film company.


(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc02.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2Fi%2F2012%2F030%2F4%2F6%2Ftrex_kill_spino_by_giu3232-d4o4zyg.jpg&hash=ccf59bd48975ee4250a3727a3c12bf3383be5905)


So the King has regained his throne.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Xan21 on Apr 10, 2012, 02:13:16 PM
very impressive stuff, but is he able to do any other dinos then the ones we already have seen?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 10, 2012, 08:32:17 PM
Quote from: Ghost Rider on Apr 10, 2012, 01:52:52 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Apr 10, 2012, 02:23:14 AM
While it's not JP4. It appears that a JP film is being made by an independent film company.


(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc02.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2Fi%2F2012%2F030%2F4%2F6%2Ftrex_kill_spino_by_giu3232-d4o4zyg.jpg&hash=ccf59bd48975ee4250a3727a3c12bf3383be5905)


So the King has regained his throne.

Yes he has!

Just found this image of CGI test, and it looks pretty good

"Watch out!"

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi2.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FUessstDGZc4%2Fhqdefault.jpg&hash=45ccb51020855b1ea8bb3dd0fff3fafa74433cf7)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Apr 10, 2012, 09:02:23 PM
Nice would like to see this fan film when it's done :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 10, 2012, 10:36:35 PM
Quote from: SM on Apr 10, 2012, 02:31:59 AM
QuoteDid you go see Jurassic Park just "for the dinosaurs?" no, you probably didn't,

:laugh:

Of course I did.  Why would anyone go watch it if not for the dinosaurs?

Close up of Laura Dern's posterior before she says "Rrrrrun!!!"?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 10, 2012, 10:37:37 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 10, 2012, 10:36:35 PM
Quote from: SM on Apr 10, 2012, 02:31:59 AM
QuoteDid you go see Jurassic Park just "for the dinosaurs?" no, you probably didn't,

:laugh:

Of course I did.  Why would anyone go watch it if not for the dinosaurs?

Close up of Laura Dern's posterior before she says "Rrrrrun!!!"?

I was just thinking about that....
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 10, 2012, 10:40:21 PM
Or, just hearing her screeeeeeeeeeeeam. You know, if you're the kinky type.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SM on Apr 10, 2012, 10:49:21 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 10, 2012, 10:36:35 PM
Quote from: SM on Apr 10, 2012, 02:31:59 AM
QuoteDid you go see Jurassic Park just "for the dinosaurs?" no, you probably didn't,

:laugh:

Of course I did.  Why would anyone go watch it if not for the dinosaurs?

Close up of Laura Dern's posterior before she says "Rrrrrun!!!"?

Was that in the trailer?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 10, 2012, 10:52:44 PM
Don't think so. But, if people wanted to try their luck, you know?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Apr 11, 2012, 01:07:30 AM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Apr 10, 2012, 02:23:14 AM
While it's not JP4. It appears that a JP film is being made by an independent film company.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth05.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2012%2F079%2Fa%2Fc%2Fjurassic_park_origins_banner_001_by_giu3232-d4tegn1.jpg&hash=8e24c883fb9b26945b3f4c158b2d4ca7f58b7a42)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc03.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2Fi%2F2012%2F066%2F1%2F5%2Fbaby_rex_male_001_by_giu3232-d4s0cj3.jpg&hash=5356d2b5b9bc67650929e2f455dc647391302bef)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc02.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2Fi%2F2012%2F030%2F4%2F6%2Ftrex_kill_spino_by_giu3232-d4o4zyg.jpg&hash=ccf59bd48975ee4250a3727a3c12bf3383be5905)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc08.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2Ff%2F2012%2F008%2F7%2F5%2Fjp_origins_previz_001_by_giu3232-d4lsdtw.jpg&hash=4154e8a815430297a0f15621597dd63bfccbca47)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth04.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2011%2F362%2F5%2F8%2Fjurassic_park_trex_by_giu3232-d4kjwvm.jpg&hash=23658175fd43e28d4b9442471a49b8eb36451674)
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/s720x720/389209_376176132417296_257949214239989_1208347_364628366_n.jpg

http://jporigins.com/ (http://jporigins.com/)
I'm friend's with the guy who making the CGI of this fan film, Julien Romeo, on facebook. He's a member of JPLegacy. Real talented guy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Apr 11, 2012, 01:29:32 AM
I just hope that fan film will get made. I see fan projects that never get finish.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ace3g on Apr 14, 2012, 05:17:54 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i99TpYtFvgc# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i99TpYtFvgc#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: KNIGHT on Apr 14, 2012, 05:21:42 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Apr 14, 2012, 05:17:54 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i99TpYtFvgc# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i99TpYtFvgc#)

You can tell how much Steven Spielberg is enjoying working with that cast. Him telling the younger kids about the amber is just.. Well, heartwarming in a way.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on May 12, 2012, 01:25:54 AM
You can't tell me that's not scary...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.cinemasquid.com%2Fblu-ray%2Ftitles%2Fthe-lost-world-jurassic-park%2F9e2282b2-18b6-48af-8c7a-96358bd1f31f%2Fscreenshot-lrg-23.png&hash=b1461d24756160881de81fc8276e122fb8a8af6c)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.cinemasquid.com%2Fblu-ray%2Ftitles%2Fthe-lost-world-jurassic-park%2F9e2282b2-18b6-48af-8c7a-96358bd1f31f%2Fscreenshot-lrg-25.png&hash=d4b592162944e64d531bbd54444957c85eff69fe)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.cinemasquid.com%2Fblu-ray%2Ftitles%2Fthe-lost-world-jurassic-park%2F9e2282b2-18b6-48af-8c7a-96358bd1f31f%2Fscreenshot-lrg-32.png&hash=3d42e2a7e9d5cf2ceabc8c1cdcd5ceb64484723a)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.cinemasquid.com%2Fblu-ray%2Ftitles%2Fthe-lost-world-jurassic-park%2F9e2282b2-18b6-48af-8c7a-96358bd1f31f%2Fscreenshot-lrg-35.png&hash=d4296d656cc04f596e4134df663def0046a59d36)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.cinemasquid.com%2Fblu-ray%2Ftitles%2Fthe-lost-world-jurassic-park%2F9e2282b2-18b6-48af-8c7a-96358bd1f31f%2Fscreenshot-lrg-38.png&hash=4fe5d897d6f414434596f9e5ab81bb7447994d65)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.cinemasquid.com%2Fblu-ray%2Ftitles%2Fjurassic-park%2F9e2282b2-18b6-48af-8c7a-96358bd1f31f%2Fscreenshot-lrg-25.png&hash=a1f894dd4dfd308e1e4768be16eb205e3e8aebfc)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.cinemasquid.com%2Fblu-ray%2Ftitles%2Fjurassic-park%2F9e2282b2-18b6-48af-8c7a-96358bd1f31f%2Fscreenshot-lrg-36.png&hash=1d13a8dc8f487cf7783f323a88c7082b55870c15)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.cinemasquid.com%2Fblu-ray%2Ftitles%2Fjurassic-park%2F9e2282b2-18b6-48af-8c7a-96358bd1f31f%2Fscreenshot-lrg-37.png&hash=014cc1b90cf557bdd7c1b5bd806d6a8a2a716ebe)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.cinemasquid.com%2Fblu-ray%2Ftitles%2Fjurassic-park%2F9e2282b2-18b6-48af-8c7a-96358bd1f31f%2Fscreenshot-lrg-38.png&hash=366a4a918a65fd84a245eaedf7bb5a7b9d09dbfa)

"BE-OTCH!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sylizar on May 12, 2012, 02:11:58 AM
I always shat bricks at the Rex sticking its head into the tent.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DJ Pu$$yface on May 12, 2012, 02:23:41 AM
Those Rexes are beautiful.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on May 12, 2012, 04:00:21 AM
Quote from: DJ Pu$$yface on May 12, 2012, 02:23:41 AM
Those Rexes are beautiful.

I know.  The only original design that almost came close was the King Kong V-Rex...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi40.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fe232%2Frog_44%2FTRex_Final_1316x1536.jpg&hash=0c2d4b5714ffe9321e4dbdf806e5bc81dabe06c3)w
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg176.imageshack.us%2Fimg176%2F5410%2Fvigorro2018.jpg&hash=edec9dbada4e8b148a79f67a6b7daad8a86d4aaf)

And I just found this awesome comparative size chart...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs3.subirimagenes.com%3A81%2Fotros%2Fprevio%2Fthump_5049744comparativa-de-dinos.jpg&hash=f223f33fbd97d0e3abaddd628e95fe10d701bc34)

I highly doubt Carnotaurus was ever that big (yeah, I know it's based on the Disney movie)  and I don't think Rex was ever that small.




Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 13, 2012, 01:01:45 AM
No way the Carno from Dinosaur was that big. At best it was the size of a modern T.Rex. That T.Rex standing next to the Spino does look deceptively small though that could just be where it's placed in the picture.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: mastermoon on May 13, 2012, 01:06:49 AM
How many Jurassic Parks do they have to make?, there is supposed to be two books and movies. Jurassic Park, Jurassic Park: The Lost World.

Having the characters return to the Island for Jurassic Park 3 is overkill, it was simply a chase movie with no character development.

Jurassic Park 4 most likely will be a rehash or if they are creative they can make something very different.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Rick Grimes on May 13, 2012, 04:37:23 PM
Anyone think Peter jackson could make a really good JP movie? Or even David Fincher?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on May 13, 2012, 04:41:31 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on May 13, 2012, 04:37:23 PM
Anyone think Peter jackson could make a really good JP movie? Or even David Fincher?
Yes to both of those. Fincher could turn the franchise into a direct horror-approach, and Jackson could elaborate on setting and creatures to create a very rich and interesting place.


I'm still iffy, since Stan Winston is gone :( If someone is designing the dinosaurs, who would we want?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on May 13, 2012, 04:56:16 PM
Legacy Effects, which is literally SWS under a new name.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: mastermoon on May 13, 2012, 05:02:40 PM
QuoteI'm still iffy, since Stan Winston is gone If someone is designing the dinosaurs, who would we want?

They could use Amalgamated Dynamics Incorporated.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 13, 2012, 05:16:07 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on May 13, 2012, 04:37:23 PM
Anyone think Peter jackson could make a really good JP movie? Or even David Fincher?

Peter Jackson...possibly. He's very dramatic in his films. JP is action and a little bit of suspense. It's not a melodrama like King Kong or LotR.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: frenchfries on May 14, 2012, 03:10:15 AM
All i know is that i want Spielberg back!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on May 14, 2012, 03:17:20 AM
Quote from: War Wager on May 13, 2012, 04:56:16 PM
Legacy Effects, which is literally SWS under a new name.

This, definitely. I see no reason to change it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on May 22, 2012, 02:39:16 AM
I'm currently writing a JP fan fiction for JPLegacy.org. How does a JP spin-off sound? Like what Prometheus will be to Alien?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 22, 2012, 03:53:36 AM
Hm. Tell me more. What would the plot entail?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on May 22, 2012, 04:04:26 AM
Quote from: evolution_rex on May 22, 2012, 02:39:16 AM
I'm currently writing a JP fan fiction for JPLegacy.org. How does a JP spin-off sound? Like what Prometheus will be to Alien?

Kinda like Telltale's game!?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 22, 2012, 05:15:50 AM
Telltale's game was a sequel. It's nothing like Prometheus or what he's describing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on May 22, 2012, 05:31:44 AM
Well, can't a spin off be a view point of the same situation from another character too?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 22, 2012, 06:20:59 AM
Prometheus isn't an Alien spinoff...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on May 22, 2012, 06:33:47 AM
Well, whatever.  He said spin-off.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on May 29, 2012, 10:26:06 PM
Beautiful new picture...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgallery.mailchimp.com%2Fa6d0a3281d255b386a0e756a3%2Fimages%2Flost_world_blog_thumbnail.jpg&hash=ec9ad0a114de336c2f2153e8831bda934cd0ef1c)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on May 30, 2012, 01:19:06 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 22, 2012, 06:20:59 AM
Prometheus isn't an Alien spinoff...
Prequel, spin-off, prequel spin-off, whatever you want to call it.
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 22, 2012, 06:33:47 AM
Well, whatever.  He said spin-off.
Right, Jurassic Park: The Game is not anything like a spin-off.

Anyway, the fan fiction will officially be announced on Jurassic Park Legacy soon. If anyone's curious or interested, look at the site for progress. Like I said, it's a spin-off. Will have less in common with Jurassic Park than Prometheus has to Alien.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 30, 2012, 01:51:37 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 29, 2012, 10:26:06 PM
Beautiful new picture...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgallery.mailchimp.com%2Fa6d0a3281d255b386a0e756a3%2Fimages%2Flost_world_blog_thumbnail.jpg&hash=ec9ad0a114de336c2f2153e8831bda934cd0ef1c)

Mmm, beautiful indeed. Must be the lighting though that makes them look all green.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on May 30, 2012, 01:52:21 AM
Yeah, soft reflection off the plants.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on May 30, 2012, 01:57:47 AM
The Rex on the right looks especially scary. It's those eyes...they almost look psychotic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on May 30, 2012, 09:44:17 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 29, 2012, 10:26:06 PM
Beautiful new picture...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgallery.mailchimp.com%2Fa6d0a3281d255b386a0e756a3%2Fimages%2Flost_world_blog_thumbnail.jpg&hash=ec9ad0a114de336c2f2153e8831bda934cd0ef1c)

To this very day it still blows my mind all the little details put into these animatronic dinosaurs, the scales, the bumps on the skin, just wow...Stan Winston was the master at this shit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 30, 2012, 12:12:41 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 30, 2012, 01:51:37 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 29, 2012, 10:26:06 PM
Beautiful new picture...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgallery.mailchimp.com%2Fa6d0a3281d255b386a0e756a3%2Fimages%2Flost_world_blog_thumbnail.jpg&hash=ec9ad0a114de336c2f2153e8831bda934cd0ef1c)

Mmm, beautiful indeed. Must be the lighting though that makes them look all green.
Yeah, though if you look closely there's a tone difference.
The male is the one on the right -- you can recognize it anyway due to the scar on the right side of its snout.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 01, 2012, 12:03:45 AM
The male had a scar?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: mastermoon on Jun 01, 2012, 03:19:36 PM
What more could they do with the Jurassic Park movies, make them return to the Island again to rehash part 1?.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 01, 2012, 06:25:14 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 01, 2012, 12:03:45 AM
The male had a scar?
Yeah, you can see it in the film when it growls at the guys, in the trailer scene.
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CYGtLUZg1xA (http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CYGtLUZg1xA)
0:50
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: First Blood on Jun 01, 2012, 09:04:41 PM
Quote from: mastermoon on Jun 01, 2012, 03:19:36 PM
What more could they do with the Jurassic Park movies, make them return to the Island again to rehash part 1?.

They haven't gone to space yet.

"The greatest theme park the Moon has ever seen! Spare no expense!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MudButt on Jun 01, 2012, 09:09:12 PM
Sam Rockwell in a JP film? Yes please!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 01, 2012, 09:10:23 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 01, 2012, 09:09:12 PM
Sam Rockwell in a JP film? Yes please!

Ahh, and I just deleted my comment thinking it may have contained spoilerific material for Moon :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 01, 2012, 11:40:37 PM
Quote from: mastermoon on Jun 01, 2012, 03:19:36 PM
What more could they do with the Jurassic Park movies, make them return to the Island again to rehash part 1?.

I would like to see a reboot. No joke. Imagine the book actually made into a movie, scene for scene!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: KNIGHT on Jun 01, 2012, 11:55:23 PM
Specifically, with this scene from the book.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc04.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2Ff%2F2011%2F072%2Fd%2Fa%2Fjurassic_park__the_river_by_vanoxymore-d3bl0tw.jpg&hash=a57673f02974940776e4b0b58d53c665c548c9de)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chrisr232007 on Jun 01, 2012, 11:58:28 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 01, 2012, 11:40:37 PM
Quote from: mastermoon on Jun 01, 2012, 03:19:36 PM
What more could they do with the Jurassic Park movies, make them return to the Island again to rehash part 1?.

I would like to see a reboot. No joke. Imagine the book actually made into a movie, scene for scene!

I say a remake is most likely what we would get then a part four, which I agree would love to see a remake that follows the book scene for scene.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ooze on First on Jun 02, 2012, 12:54:25 AM
I really want to see another one, if for no other reason than to see what ILM can do with the dinos using current technology.

Sadly, I doubt this movie will ever be made.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 02, 2012, 01:40:46 AM
They'd keep doing what they've doing for years. I wouldn't want them to quit using animatronics though. All CGI dinosaurs look pretty awful.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 02, 2012, 05:19:52 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jun 01, 2012, 06:25:14 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 01, 2012, 12:03:45 AM
The male had a scar?
Yeah, you can see it in the film when it growls at the guys, in the trailer scene.
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CYGtLUZg1xA (http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CYGtLUZg1xA)
0:50

I wonder where he got that from...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jun 02, 2012, 06:36:07 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 02, 2012, 01:40:46 AM
All CGI dinosaurs look pretty awful.

The dinosaurs in Peter Jackson's King Kong remake and the ones in Land of the Lost looked good if you ask me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 02, 2012, 07:52:04 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 02, 2012, 05:19:52 AM
I wonder where he got that from...
That's why we're bros!
As a kid I used to wonder that each time I saw the film. Always thought in my earlier years that the guy got in a fight with a Triceratops.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: King Rathalos on Jun 02, 2012, 11:42:16 AM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Jun 02, 2012, 06:36:07 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 02, 2012, 01:40:46 AM
All CGI dinosaurs look pretty awful.

The dinosaurs in Peter Jackson's King Kong remake and the ones in Land of the Lost looked good if you ask me.

King Kong yeah, Land of the Lost...ehh not so much. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 02, 2012, 02:13:57 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Jun 02, 2012, 06:36:07 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 02, 2012, 01:40:46 AM
All CGI dinosaurs look pretty awful.

The dinosaurs in Peter Jackson's King Kong remake and the ones in Land of the Lost looked good if you ask me.

Just to clarify, what I meant was dinosaurs that are 100% CGI, with no practical effects used look bad. King Kong was decent but those dinos needed more colour to them.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on Jun 02, 2012, 05:23:29 PM
I would watch a continuation of Peter Jackson's King Kong for sure.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Keg on Jun 02, 2012, 05:32:27 PM
Another film on Skull Island would be fantastic, I'd certainly be up for that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jun 02, 2012, 07:29:37 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Jun 02, 2012, 11:42:16 AM


King Kong yeah, Land of the Lost...ehh not so much. :laugh:

Yeah looking back, they didn't look that great. I remember seeing the movie a few years ago and I was like "The T-Rex looks good for a CG Dinosaur".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 02, 2012, 11:51:41 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jun 02, 2012, 07:52:04 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 02, 2012, 05:19:52 AM
I wonder where he got that from...
That's why we're bros!
As a kid I used to wonder that each time I saw the film. Always thought in my earlier years that the guy got in a fight with a Triceratops.

I remember there was always a debate between my friends on whether or not the Rex from JPIII was the baby from The Lost World.  They claimed that you could see the scar on the leg as he steps down on Grant.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 03, 2012, 08:29:57 AM
I don't think it is. Always thought it was just a random T.Rex on Sorna.
Besides, what scar? :laugh: When it steps down on Grant, what you are seeing are just textures of the skin. You see it later and there's no trace of this supposed scar.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Jun 03, 2012, 09:21:01 AM
He has studied every frame of every scene with any sort of dinosaurs.
Trust him
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2012, 12:25:30 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jun 03, 2012, 08:29:57 AM
I don't think it is. Always thought it was just a random T.Rex on Sorna.
Besides, what scar? :laugh: When it steps down on Grant, what you are seeing are just textures of the skin. You see it later and there's no trace of this supposed scar.

I think it was the baby. There's no indication, I don't think, of how much time passed between TLW and JP3 but it makes the most sense. T.Rex grew fairly rapidly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 03, 2012, 12:49:58 PM
Think as you want. It being the TLW baby'd ruin some of that film's charm for me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2012, 02:57:55 PM
Why?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 03, 2012, 02:59:43 PM
That beautiful ending with the T.Rex family... and then the baby, grown up, is killed as an extra?
Awkward.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2012, 03:31:05 PM
Gotta luv dat Jack Horner...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 03, 2012, 04:01:50 PM
BECOS A DINOSAWR IS MORE FEROCES IF ITS BIGGR. RAWR.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 03, 2012, 07:06:02 PM
Pfffft...

Please.  ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 03, 2012, 07:56:22 PM
I can asshor u from dem fossil evidenceseseses
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jun 03, 2012, 09:04:53 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jun 03, 2012, 12:49:58 PM
Think as you want. It being the TLW baby'd ruin some of that film's charm for me.
To me it just seems like a stupid and unnecessary coincidence. Besides, I can't even wrap my head around the fact that the set-centric Isla Sorna in JPIII is the same one as the nurturally beautiful TLW's.

...And the biome differences. Dear gawd.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Jun 03, 2012, 09:25:55 PM
For those who liked Jurassic Park: The Game, JPLegacy is having a petition for "The Lost World: The Game." We'd appreciate more people to sign it. The petition can be found here: http://www.change.org/petitions/fans-of-jurassic-park-and-telltale-games-get-telltale-games-to-make-a-the-lost-world-jurassic-park-game (http://www.change.org/petitions/fans-of-jurassic-park-and-telltale-games-get-telltale-games-to-make-a-the-lost-world-jurassic-park-game)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2012, 10:33:38 PM
^ Signed!

Quote from: Space Sweeper on Jun 03, 2012, 09:04:53 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jun 03, 2012, 12:49:58 PM
Think as you want. It being the TLW baby'd ruin some of that film's charm for me.
To me it just seems like a stupid and unnecessary coincidence. Besides, I can't even wrap my head around the fact that the set-centric Isla Sorna in JPIII is the same one as the nurturally beautiful TLW's.

...And the biome differences. Dear gawd.

It's not as if we saw the entire island in TLW. It's conceivable that all of what we saw in JP III was there the entire time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 04, 2012, 05:00:20 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2012, 10:33:38 PM
^ Signed!

Quote from: Space Sweeper on Jun 03, 2012, 09:04:53 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jun 03, 2012, 12:49:58 PM
Think as you want. It being the TLW baby'd ruin some of that film's charm for me.
To me it just seems like a stupid and unnecessary coincidence. Besides, I can't even wrap my head around the fact that the set-centric Isla Sorna in JPIII is the same one as the nurturally beautiful TLW's.

...And the biome differences. Dear gawd.

It's not as if we saw the entire island in TLW. It's conceivable that all of what we saw in JP III was there the entire time.

I recall in the JPIII featurette that they wanted Sorna to look really "weathered and out of control".  I guess they wanted to show how much time has passed since the island was abandoned.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 04, 2012, 02:20:28 PM
The only continuity issue I have is that, where did the new raptors come from? Were the ones in TLW simply younger than their JP III counterparts and had not grown feathers yet, or were these a separate pack altogether living on the other side of the island?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Jun 04, 2012, 03:47:17 PM
I don't think they were supposed to be new raptors at all. They just switched around the design a a bit and pretended it had been that way all along.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 04, 2012, 05:42:57 PM
Technically they were different since they looked differently and behaved differently. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 04, 2012, 06:32:24 PM
Let's just see a Utahraptor already...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.prehistoric-wildlife.com%2Fimages%2Fspecies%2Fu%2Futahraptor-size.jpg&hash=64a18178fd9637a2e47b5470135b0da415ad24a1)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 04, 2012, 07:44:17 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 04, 2012, 02:20:28 PM
The only continuity issue I have is that, where did the new raptors come from? Were the ones in TLW simply younger than their JP III counterparts and had not grown feathers yet, or were these a separate pack altogether living on the other side of the island?
Most likely the second one you mentioned.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Jun 05, 2012, 03:17:11 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 04, 2012, 06:32:24 PM
Let's just see a Utahraptor already...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.prehistoric-wildlife.com%2Fimages%2Fspecies%2Fu%2Futahraptor-size.jpg&hash=64a18178fd9637a2e47b5470135b0da415ad24a1)
Yes, let's use a dinosaur that wasn't discovered until after the films.  ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 05, 2012, 03:59:14 AM
Quote from: evolution_rex on Jun 05, 2012, 03:17:11 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 04, 2012, 06:32:24 PM
Let's just see a Utahraptor already...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.prehistoric-wildlife.com%2Fimages%2Fspecies%2Fu%2Futahraptor-size.jpg&hash=64a18178fd9637a2e47b5470135b0da415ad24a1)
Yes, let's use a dinosaur that wasn't discovered until after the films.  ::)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages1.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20110115063117%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2F0%2F06%2FUtahraptor_toy.jpg&hash=a291cabd5af1694fb0ce86da4323dd2916d54443)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youknow-forkids.com%2Fnews%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2008%2F09%2Ftlj.jpg&hash=ae66fd01d305776cbf9fd9bb192d64232debf130)


Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Jun 05, 2012, 04:10:41 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 05, 2012, 03:59:14 AM
Quote from: evolution_rex on Jun 05, 2012, 03:17:11 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 04, 2012, 06:32:24 PM
Let's just see a Utahraptor already...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.prehistoric-wildlife.com%2Fimages%2Fspecies%2Fu%2Futahraptor-size.jpg&hash=64a18178fd9637a2e47b5470135b0da415ad24a1)
Yes, let's use a dinosaur that wasn't discovered until after the films.  ::)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages1.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20110115063117%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2F0%2F06%2FUtahraptor_toy.jpg&hash=a291cabd5af1694fb0ce86da4323dd2916d54443)

http://www.youknow-forkids.com/news/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/tlj.jpg
If you're implying they gave a f**k when they made the toys, well your wrong.

Luckily it's not canon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jun 05, 2012, 04:18:42 AM
I don't think that's the point he's making. I think the point he's making is that the franchise acknowledges Utahraptor's very existence, therefore making your argument invalid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Jun 05, 2012, 04:21:59 AM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Jun 05, 2012, 04:18:42 AM
I don't think that's the point he's making. I think the point he's making is that the franchise acknowledges it's very existence, therefore making your argument invalid.
My argument is that the film takes place in 1993, so unless they created more after it's discovery, there can't be any Utahraptors. Unless they want to explain that the JP universe discovered Utahraptor before our universe, which is fine considering all the other differences in paleontology.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jun 05, 2012, 04:27:27 AM
If they can over exaggerate the size of the Velociraptor I don't think throwing in Utahraptors is going to do any real damage unless it happens to be executed poorly which is another story.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 05, 2012, 04:35:54 AM
A raptor the size of a truck can do some real damage

(I know what you mean though ;))
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nychus on Jun 06, 2012, 08:56:58 AM
These things are genetically engineered which makes scientific accuracy kind of moot(case of point, Dilophosaurus). The feathers could be dormant genes for all we know. That, or they released earlier version numbers with the traits. In any case, the old Raptors do have their place if the film-makers care enough to make them interesting again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 06, 2012, 03:44:50 PM
We don't need new dinosaurs. We just need old ones used in better ways. Like the Dilophosaurus; poor guy gets no respect!

Quote from: evolution_rex on Jun 05, 2012, 04:21:59 AM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Jun 05, 2012, 04:18:42 AM
I don't think that's the point he's making. I think the point he's making is that the franchise acknowledges it's very existence, therefore making your argument invalid.
My argument is that the film takes place in 1993, so unless they created more after it's discovery, there can't be any Utahraptors. Unless they want to explain that the JP universe discovered Utahraptor before our universe, which is fine considering all the other differences in paleontology.

You do know that the JP merchandise spawned tons dinosaurs that were never seen in any of the films, right? It doesn't matter if they didn't exist in the movies already because like Rich said, the franchose already acknowledges their existence.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: ace3g on Jun 21, 2012, 03:15:55 AM
Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes Screenwriters Hired For JURASSIC PARK 4

According to Deadline Universal Pictures is tapping into their Jurassic Park franchise one more time. And why shouldn't they? The three previous films have amassed $1.9 billion worldwide. This time they are looking at screenwriters Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver to revitalize the franchise, which they have quite a bit of experience with. The pair are responsible for salvaging the Planet of the Apes franchise with their refreshing script for Rise of the Planet of the Apes.

Jurassic Park 4 will be produced by Steven Spielberg and Kathleen Kennedy. At the moment no director is attached. Kathleen Kennedy in last December said that the film could be released either Christmas 2014 or summer 2015. Til then Universal is re-releasing the original Jurassic Park in 3D on July 19, 2013.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=62085 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=62085)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: chrisr232007 on Jun 21, 2012, 03:19:30 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Jun 21, 2012, 03:15:55 AM
Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes Screenwriters Hired For JURASSIC PARK 4

According to Deadline Universal Pictures is tapping into their Jurassic Park franchise one more time. And why shouldn't they? The three previous films have amassed $1.9 billion worldwide. This time they are looking at screenwriters Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver to revitalize the franchise, which they have quite a bit of experience with. The pair are responsible for salvaging the Planet of the Apes franchise with their refreshing script for Rise of the Planet of the Apes.

Jurassic Park 4 will be produced by Steven Spielberg and Kathleen Kennedy. At the moment no director is attached. Kathleen Kennedy in last December said that the film could be released either Christmas 2014 or summer 2015. Til then Universal is re-releasing the original Jurassic Park in 3D on July 19, 2013.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=62085 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=62085)

Yes!!!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 21, 2012, 03:29:33 AM
Well, consider me excited. I loved Rise.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2012, 03:41:49 AM
Rise was fantastic. These guys just might be able to bring back the important themes that were in the first JP film, and do them in an new and exciting way. Just like Rise, come to think of it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: lozzy.94 on Jun 21, 2012, 03:44:37 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Jun 21, 2012, 03:15:55 AM
Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes Screenwriters Hired For JURASSIC PARK 4

According to Deadline Universal Pictures is tapping into their Jurassic Park franchise one more time. And why shouldn't they? The three previous films have amassed $1.9 billion worldwide. This time they are looking at screenwriters Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver to revitalize the franchise, which they have quite a bit of experience with. The pair are responsible for salvaging the Planet of the Apes franchise with their refreshing script for Rise of the Planet of the Apes.

Jurassic Park 4 will be produced by Steven Spielberg and Kathleen Kennedy. At the moment no director is attached. Kathleen Kennedy in last December said that the film could be released either Christmas 2014 or summer 2015. Til then Universal is re-releasing the original Jurassic Park in 3D on July 19, 2013.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=62085 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=62085)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUH3JQjcweM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUH3JQjcweM#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jun 21, 2012, 04:01:32 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Jun 21, 2012, 03:15:55 AM
Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes Screenwriters Hired For JURASSIC PARK 4

According to Deadline Universal Pictures is tapping into their Jurassic Park franchise one more time. And why shouldn't they? The three previous films have amassed $1.9 billion worldwide. This time they are looking at screenwriters Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver to revitalize the franchise, which they have quite a bit of experience with. The pair are responsible for salvaging the Planet of the Apes franchise with their refreshing script for Rise of the Planet of the Apes.

Jurassic Park 4 will be produced by Steven Spielberg and Kathleen Kennedy. At the moment no director is attached. Kathleen Kennedy in last December said that the film could be released either Christmas 2014 or summer 2015. Til then Universal is re-releasing the original Jurassic Park in 3D on July 19, 2013.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=62085 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=62085)
Good match, at least we know we won't have another Jurassic Park 3 on our hands. Hopefully Spielberg is inspired to take that director's seat once more.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jun 21, 2012, 04:07:22 AM
I couldn't ask for a better choice for the writers of this. I'm getting quite optimistic now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 21, 2012, 04:27:06 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Jun 21, 2012, 03:15:55 AM
Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes Screenwriters Hired For JURASSIC PARK 4

According to Deadline Universal Pictures is tapping into their Jurassic Park franchise one more time. And why shouldn't they? The three previous films have amassed $1.9 billion worldwide. This time they are looking at screenwriters Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver to revitalize the franchise, which they have quite a bit of experience with. The pair are responsible for salvaging the Planet of the Apes franchise with their refreshing script for Rise of the Planet of the Apes.

Jurassic Park 4 will be produced by Steven Spielberg and Kathleen Kennedy. At the moment no director is attached. Kathleen Kennedy in last December said that the film could be released either Christmas 2014 or summer 2015. Til then Universal is re-releasing the original Jurassic Park in 3D on July 19, 2013.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=62085 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=62085)


EXCITING!  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Jun 21, 2012, 04:59:24 AM
They're re-releasing Jurassic Park in 3D?  Wow, they're really milking that sales gimmick, I wonder if I should be worried; I already bought the entire trilogy on Blu-Ray, I hope I don't have to buy it again in 3D.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jun 21, 2012, 05:00:38 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Jun 21, 2012, 04:59:24 AM
I already bought the entire trilogy on Blu-Ray, I hope I don't have to buy it again in 3D.
You know, they have this thing they're calling 'choice' now?  ???
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Jun 21, 2012, 05:04:04 AM
THERE IS NO FREE CHOICE, ONLY 3D!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: MykeHavoc on Jun 21, 2012, 05:18:36 AM
Well this might explain why they weren't hired to write the Apes sequel. Excellent choice. This married couple could be on track to revive every successful sci-fi franchise.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Jun 21, 2012, 05:20:39 AM
...including AVP. ;) :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Elliott on Jun 21, 2012, 05:21:27 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 04, 2012, 05:42:57 PM
Technically they were different since they looked differently and behaved differently.

There are the Nublarensis;
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc09.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2Fi%2F2010%2F199%2Fb%2F8%2FMale_Velociraptor_Nublarensis__by_ebelesaurus.jpg&hash=22f9e44f0d890f4b1967f14ca82171a6f1ee976d)
These are the velociraptors from the first and second movie.

Then there are the Sorneansis;
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc09.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2Fi%2F2010%2F304%2F5%2F6%2Fvelociraptor_sornaensis_male_by_ebelesaurus-d31vpmn.jpg&hash=ed3bd00a5f1d6a55a81eee5bdaf485cceb414a1c)
They are basically two different species.
EDIT;
The Nublars are also hell bent on death and destruction. They are INCREDIBLY aggressive. (Shown in JP and TLW.)
Sornas are smarter and more calculating. (Shown in JPIII.)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Jun 21, 2012, 05:54:53 AM
Oh man, fantastic choice for the writers, I really can't think of anyone better
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 21, 2012, 08:31:59 AM
Shitshitshitshitshitshit

They... just moved forward a step?

UNREAL.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Jun 21, 2012, 08:33:13 AM
Yeah, this is the kind of movie you would expect to stay in development hell forever. But it's nice to see that they got some good writers for it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: lozzy.94 on Jun 21, 2012, 08:43:18 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Jun 21, 2012, 05:20:39 AM
...including AVP. ;) :D

That would be a dream come true!!! (:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jun 21, 2012, 08:45:31 AM
Holy shit, I've waited for this day so many years... It's actually happening. :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2012, 02:04:08 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Jun 21, 2012, 03:15:55 AM
Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes Screenwriters Hired For JURASSIC PARK 4

According to Deadline Universal Pictures is tapping into their Jurassic Park franchise one more time. And why shouldn't they? The three previous films have amassed $1.9 billion worldwide. This time they are looking at screenwriters Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver to revitalize the franchise, which they have quite a bit of experience with. The pair are responsible for salvaging the Planet of the Apes franchise with their refreshing script for Rise of the Planet of the Apes.

Jurassic Park 4 will be produced by Steven Spielberg and Kathleen Kennedy. At the moment no director is attached. Kathleen Kennedy in last December said that the film could be released either Christmas 2014 or summer 2015. Til then Universal is re-releasing the original Jurassic Park in 3D on July 19, 2013.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=62085 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=62085)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fchakru.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F05%2Fshut-up-money.jpg&hash=de3e922c0e32839a2043195b390532faeb2546e6)

Quote from: Galliruler on Jun 21, 2012, 05:21:27 AM
EDIT;
The Nublars are also hell bent on death and destruction. They are INCREDIBLY aggressive. (Shown in JP and TLW.)
Sornas are smarter and more calculating. (Shown in JPIII.)

TLW was Isla Sorna. So yes, they must've been the same species.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Elliott on Jun 21, 2012, 06:38:01 PM
Quote from: Galliruler on Jun 21, 2012, 05:21:27 AM
EDIT;
The Nublars are also hell bent on death and destruction. They are INCREDIBLY aggressive. (Shown in JP and TLW.)
Sornas are smarter and more calculating. (Shown in JPIII.)

TLW was Isla Sorna. So yes, they must've been the same species.
[/quote]

Yes, while it was Isla Sorna, the velociraptors were of the Nublar subspecies. The Sorna subspecies, theorized to be on the island during TLW, has been thought to have a rivalry with the Nublars and have a strict territorial pattern.
QuoteThus, the classification of names we will refer to as for the Velociraptors in Jurassic Park and The Lost World: Jurassic Park will be known as Velociraptor "antirrhopus nublarensis" sensu Paul while the raptors seen in Jurassic Park /// will be referred to as Velociraptor "antirrhopus sornaensis" sensu Paul.

http://www.jplegacy.org/jpencyclopedia/?p=101 (http://www.jplegacy.org/jpencyclopedia/?p=101)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 21, 2012, 07:26:44 PM
Ah, good old fan speculations.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2012, 07:31:52 PM
Quote from: Galliruler on Jun 21, 2012, 06:38:01 PM
Yes, while it was Isla Sorna, the velociraptors were of the Nublar subspecies. The Sorna subspecies, theorized to be on the island during TLW, has been thought to have a rivalry with the Nublars and have a strict territorial pattern.

Why would there be two separate genuses (sp?)? It makes more sense I think to work with the notion that they are one in the same because a newly evolved raptor works within the realm of JP continuity, what with the DNA tampering.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jun 21, 2012, 07:34:47 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Jun 21, 2012, 04:01:32 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Jun 21, 2012, 03:15:55 AM
Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes Screenwriters Hired For JURASSIC PARK 4

According to Deadline Universal Pictures is tapping into their Jurassic Park franchise one more time. And why shouldn't they? The three previous films have amassed $1.9 billion worldwide. This time they are looking at screenwriters Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver to revitalize the franchise, which they have quite a bit of experience with. The pair are responsible for salvaging the Planet of the Apes franchise with their refreshing script for Rise of the Planet of the Apes.

Jurassic Park 4 will be produced by Steven Spielberg and Kathleen Kennedy. At the moment no director is attached. Kathleen Kennedy in last December said that the film could be released either Christmas 2014 or summer 2015. Til then Universal is re-releasing the original Jurassic Park in 3D on July 19, 2013.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=62085 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=62085)
Good match, at least we know we won't have another Jurassic Park 3 on our hands. Hopefully Spielberg is inspired to take that director's seat once more.

I thought in an interview Spielberg didn't want to direct another JP film, the same thing happened with JP3; he said something along the lines of "I'm done with making Jurassic Park films, and I want to continue my career doing new projects". i already know that Sam Neil is not returing so will that mean we will get an entirely new cast? If so, who should star in it.

Quote from: predxeno on Jun 21, 2012, 04:59:24 AM
They're re-releasing Jurassic Park in 3D?  Wow, they're really milking that sales gimmick, I wonder if I should be worried; I already bought the entire trilogy on Blu-Ray, I hope I don't have to buy it again in 3D.

Hey bro, you don't have to buy everything they release you know.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2012, 07:58:34 PM
Who should star? Well, after seeing Drive, I kind of want to see Ryan Gosling in everything.

Also, a dino I'd like to see:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.webosaurs.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2010%2F08%2FTherizinosaurus-Cellon.jpg&hash=90c4fe5a983d68a560971f990934532841061225)

Therizinosaurus not only looks Badas*, but would supply some nice herbivore action as well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jun 21, 2012, 08:07:14 PM
I think the 3D re-release is done to see if people still like Jurassic Park or not. I think the 3D re-release will done fine and that it will help Jurassic Park 4 move faster into development.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 21, 2012, 08:34:07 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2012, 07:31:52 PM
I think to work with the notion that they are one in the same because a newly evolved raptor works within the realm of JP continuity, what with the DNA tampering.

Two different species. Even in the Trespasser game they acknowledged this.

Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2012, 07:58:34 PM
Also, a dino I'd like to see:

http://blog.webosaurs.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Therizinosaurus-Cellon.jpg

Therizinosaurus not only looks Badas*, but would supply some nice herbivore action as well.

Hell no. Even though that dinosaur existed I would hate to see it on screen. Looks stupid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 21, 2012, 08:39:17 PM
That specific drawing does look silly...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.wikia.com%2Fwalkingwith%2Fimages%2F5%2F57%2FTherizinosaurus_vs_tarbosaurus.jpg&hash=e38e0d222785fb20127d59c0de7cc290f3103553)

THIS... does not.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Berserker Pred on Jun 21, 2012, 08:39:44 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2012, 07:58:34 PM
Who should star? Well, after seeing Drive, I kind of want to see Ryan Gosling in everything.

Also, a dino I'd like to see:

http://blog.webosaurs.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Therizinosaurus-Cellon.jpg

Therizinosaurus not only looks Badas*, but would supply some nice herbivore action as well.

It looks awesome but then you see it's tiny head and it doesn't look awesome anymore.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DJ Pu$$yface on Jun 21, 2012, 08:42:07 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jun 21, 2012, 08:39:17 PM
That specific drawing does look silly...

http://images.wikia.com/walkingwith/images/5/57/Therizinosaurus_vs_tarbosaurus.jpg

THIS... does not.

It looks like it's trying to bitch slap the Tyrannosaurus Bataar.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jun 21, 2012, 09:01:22 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Jun 21, 2012, 08:07:14 PM
I think the 3D re-release is done to see if people still like Jurassic Park or not. I think the 3D re-release will done fine and that it will help Jurassic Park 4 move faster into development.

This might be in production by the time JP 3D comes out if the writing process moves at normal speed. I think it's pretty obvious this will make big money.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2012, 09:05:28 PM
Quote from: DJ Pu$$yface on Jun 21, 2012, 08:42:07 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jun 21, 2012, 08:39:17 PM
That specific drawing does look silly...

http://images.wikia.com/walkingwith/images/5/57/Therizinosaurus_vs_tarbosaurus.jpg

THIS... does not.

It looks like it's trying to bitch slap the Tyrannosaurus Bataar.

It did. It's from Chased By Dinosaurs. And it's Tarbosaurus!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 21, 2012, 09:09:27 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2012, 09:05:28 PM
It did. It's from Chased By Dinosaurs. And it's Tarbosaurus!
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.pictureshunt.com%2Fpics%2Fh%2Fhigh_five-2495.jpg&hash=7ae7a8dd632175f13de660edcce910452c31ee49)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Elliott on Jun 21, 2012, 09:22:40 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 21, 2012, 08:34:07 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2012, 07:31:52 PM
I think to work with the notion that they are one in the same because a newly evolved raptor works within the realm of JP continuity, what with the DNA tampering.

Two different species. Even in the Trespasser game they acknowledged this.

This guy knows what's up.
Even from the behavior we can tell they're different species.
The ones from JP are extremely aggressive, and attack not to feed, but to kill. They hunt for pleasure.
The ones from TLW behave exactly alike. Examples include the long grass scene where the hunters were hunted by the velociraptors and killed for no reason. There was even a scene, when Sarah pulls the tiles off a hut's roof, where a Nublar falls onto another Nublar and they both fight. The two were male and female, fighting. (Now, here's where the proof comes in that they were the same species from the first movie.)
In that scene we see a pure brown velociraptor. This is the female. How do I know it's female? The velociraptors from the first film are brown as well, and they were all female.
The other velociraptor fighting the female is the new tiger-striped varient. This is the male. They appeared only in this movie. (Since this movie is trying to show a dinosaur ecosystem, not a park, with male and female varients of each dinosaur.)

Still don't believe me? Let's take a look at this picture...
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.wikia.com%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2F7%2F7e%2FLostWorld1.jpg&hash=105b46fa8350be54e7d57426c79b29a61a56d68e)
See the brown in the middle back, in front of the one in the trees? That's the female. The one on the left is the male.

And this is a female from the first movie;
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rareresource.com%2FBlogs%2Fuploaded_images%2Fvelociraptor-767508.jpg&hash=04ae86461d6d9ebf98e1ef84bdaac5b0e06546f7)

And here are both the male, and female versions in Jurassic Park III.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg814.imageshack.us%2Fimg814%2F9770%2Fjp3malevelociraptorbyya.jpg&hash=0648927165bc3560b3a165d2c0febe4f8e6647ff)
These are the males.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg600.imageshack.us%2Fimg600%2F1256%2Fjp3femaleraptorcolorbyy.jpg&hash=e9dee6df70e3363989f216df59dd9a4d473a90ae)
And these are the females.

They in no way resemble the other velociraptors from the previous movies except for the simple fact that they are raptors, too. And how can a species of velociraptor evolve in like, what, seven years, into a completely differently behaved animal? They can't.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DJ Pu$$yface on Jun 21, 2012, 09:29:44 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2012, 09:05:28 PM
Quote from: DJ Pu$$yface on Jun 21, 2012, 08:42:07 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jun 21, 2012, 08:39:17 PM
That specific drawing does look silly...

http://images.wikia.com/walkingwith/images/5/57/Therizinosaurus_vs_tarbosaurus.jpg

THIS... does not.

It looks like it's trying to bitch slap the Tyrannosaurus Bataar.

It did. It's from Chased By Dinosaurs. And it's Tarbosaurus!

AKA Tyrannosaurus Bataar 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jun 21, 2012, 10:14:44 PM
Quote from: Galliruler on Jun 21, 2012, 09:22:40 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 21, 2012, 08:34:07 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2012, 07:31:52 PM
I think to work with the notion that they are one in the same because a newly evolved raptor works within the realm of JP continuity, what with the DNA tampering.

Two different species. Even in the Trespasser game they acknowledged this.

This guy knows what's up.
Even from the behavior we can tell they're different species.
The ones from JP are extremely aggressive, and attack not to feed, but to kill. They hunt for pleasure.
The ones from TLW behave exactly alike. Examples include the long grass scene where the hunters were hunted by the velociraptors and killed for no reason. There was even a scene, when Sarah pulls the tiles off a hut's roof, where a Nublar falls onto another Nublar and they both fight. The two were male and female, fighting. (Now, here's where the proof comes in that they were the same species from the first movie.)
In that scene we see a pure brown velociraptor. This is the female. How do I know it's female? The velociraptors from the first film are brown as well, and they were all female.
The other velociraptor fighting the female is the new tiger-striped varient. This is the male. They appeared only in this movie. (Since this movie is trying to show a dinosaur ecosystem, not a park, with male and female varients of each dinosaur.)

Still don't believe me? Let's take a look at this picture...
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.wikia.com%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2F7%2F7e%2FLostWorld1.jpg&hash=105b46fa8350be54e7d57426c79b29a61a56d68e)
See the brown in the middle back, in front of the one in the trees? That's the female. The one on the left is the male.

And this is a female from the first movie;
http://www.rareresource.com/Blogs/uploaded_images/velociraptor-767508.jpg

And here are both the male, and female versions in Jurassic Park III.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg814.imageshack.us%2Fimg814%2F9770%2Fjp3malevelociraptorbyya.jpg&hash=0648927165bc3560b3a165d2c0febe4f8e6647ff)
These are the males.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg600.imageshack.us%2Fimg600%2F1256%2Fjp3femaleraptorcolorbyy.jpg&hash=e9dee6df70e3363989f216df59dd9a4d473a90ae)
And these are the females.

They in no way resemble the other velociraptors from the previous movies except for the simple fact that they are raptors, too. And how can a species of velociraptor evolve in like, what, seven years, into a completely differently behaved animal? They can't.

Listen to this nigga.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Jun 21, 2012, 10:38:31 PM
I have a question about Jurassic Park The Game from Telltale Games, did they ever explain how InGen got Mosasaur DNA?  I looked through all the Diary entries and all the conversational bits I could find, but couldn't find any mention to that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: TheDamnSheep on Jun 21, 2012, 10:44:13 PM
Mosasaurs were air breathers, so if one breached near the coast long enough, or if one washed up on a beach.

In the books, Ingen could also extract DNA from ground up dinosaurs fossils but this was considered to be crapshoot. I'm not sure about the movies, but it's not that wild of an explanation.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Jun 21, 2012, 10:51:51 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TsXX1JCtpA# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TsXX1JCtpA#)

This is fantastic news! They did a great job with Rise of the Apes, and I think having them on the project adds credibility to the franchise that is sorely needed. Now we need a good director, and some good actors. Brad Bird has my vote to direct, and I'd love to see Idris Elba in it, since I pretty much want him to be in every movie and he deserves to finally have top billing.

I really think we need entirely new characters all around, and a new location. No dino soldiers or dinosaurs invading the mainland. I'd preferably like it if they brought things back a bit, and focused on fewer dinosaur species but in bigger ways. No aquatic reptiles, Spinosaurus, or completely feathered raptors. It may be scientifically accurate, but I prefer the classics. It would be cool to introduce a new species, that is feathered. Maybe troodon like in the game.

I have some ideas about what I would like to see in a new JP movie, mainly it just involves people getting killed by raptors. A lot.

And Predxeno, from what I remember they don't mention how they found DNA for the Mosasuar.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Jun 21, 2012, 11:05:10 PM
I would like to see a mosasaur in the new JP movie. But what i would love to see is a Dimetrodon ;D
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.wikia.com%2Fdinosaurs%2Fimages%2Fe%2Fef%2FDimetrodon.jpg&hash=323eac8dad9268f022afc8eb173b1907065e9d3e)

Also maybe make a more soldier based movie like aliens maybe ??? Go to a place that has gone to hell or something like that :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Elliott on Jun 21, 2012, 11:11:23 PM
I want to see more of this motherf**ker.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc02.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2Fi%2F2011%2F098%2F6%2Fc%2Fdilophosaurus_by_kyoht-d3diw65.jpg&hash=eb8d0272f4117e5ae0312667172af8ec174d13aa)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dinosaur-world.com%2Fweird_dinosaurs%2Fspecies%2Fdilophosaurus_wertherelli.gif&hash=d7c79d9e5317ce1a9a3ff05f9cc9c2f15f473565)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc02.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2Fi%2F2010%2F065%2F3%2Fa%2FJP_Dilophosaurus_Giftart_by_hellraptor.jpg&hash=7ad9f71e6ad2f56c8d129fa341c811952de22114)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffiles.truedinos.webnode.com%2F200000737-bf349c02e2%2FDilophosaurus5.jpg&hash=a0f38d6b039e69aa2171b8f2a5ecec6373b4c033)

And before any of you say, "But they're so small!"

The one in the first movie was a hatchling. The Dilophosaurus wertherelli (or venefir), is around 25ft long, I believe, when full grown.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2012, 11:15:48 PM
Quote from: Galliruler on Jun 21, 2012, 09:22:40 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 21, 2012, 08:34:07 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2012, 07:31:52 PM
I think to work with the notion that they are one in the same because a newly evolved raptor works within the realm of JP continuity, what with the DNA tampering.

Two different species. Even in the Trespasser game they acknowledged this.

This guy knows what's up.
Even from the behavior we can tell they're different species.
The ones from JP are extremely aggressive, and attack not to feed, but to kill. They hunt for pleasure.
The ones from TLW behave exactly alike. Examples include the long grass scene where the hunters were hunted by the velociraptors and killed for no reason. There was even a scene, when Sarah pulls the tiles off a hut's roof, where a Nublar falls onto another Nublar and they both fight. The two were male and female, fighting. (Now, here's where the proof comes in that they were the same species from the first movie.)
In that scene we see a pure brown velociraptor. This is the female. How do I know it's female? The velociraptors from the first film are brown as well, and they were all female.
The other velociraptor fighting the female is the new tiger-striped varient. This is the male. They appeared only in this movie. (Since this movie is trying to show a dinosaur ecosystem, not a park, with male and female varients of each dinosaur.)

Still don't believe me? Let's take a look at this picture...
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.wikia.com%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2F7%2F7e%2FLostWorld1.jpg&hash=105b46fa8350be54e7d57426c79b29a61a56d68e)
See the brown in the middle back, in front of the one in the trees? That's the female. The one on the left is the male.

And this is a female from the first movie;
http://www.rareresource.com/Blogs/uploaded_images/velociraptor-767508.jpg

And here are both the male, and female versions in Jurassic Park III.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg814.imageshack.us%2Fimg814%2F9770%2Fjp3malevelociraptorbyya.jpg&hash=0648927165bc3560b3a165d2c0febe4f8e6647ff)
These are the males.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg600.imageshack.us%2Fimg600%2F1256%2Fjp3femaleraptorcolorbyy.jpg&hash=e9dee6df70e3363989f216df59dd9a4d473a90ae)
And these are the females.

They in no way resemble the other velociraptors from the previous movies except for the simple fact that they are raptors, too. And how can a species of velociraptor evolve in like, what, seven years, into a completely differently behaved animal? They can't.

I would still disagree with you. Remember that in JP, the dinosaurs were found to be breeding. If they were all female, that wouldn't have been possible. Due to the frog DNA in their blood, they were able to change sex from male to female. Grant explains as much when he finds the nest. Ergo, I don't believe ALL the raptors in the first film were female.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: KNIGHT on Jun 21, 2012, 11:18:44 PM
True, but would that have really changed their skin color, switching genders like that?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2012, 11:21:25 PM
I don't know. Again, this is why I go back to the bit about DNA-tampering.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Elliott on Jun 21, 2012, 11:24:31 PM
Go to google and look up "velociraptor anthrihoppus nublarensis"

Then look up "velociraptor anthrihoppus sornaensis".


Two completely different search results come up. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Jun 21, 2012, 11:27:31 PM
Jurassic Park The Game actually explains that the Dilophosaur's small size, frill, and spittable poison may have been caused by the DNA tampering.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Elliott on Jun 21, 2012, 11:32:47 PM
Quote from: predxeno on Jun 21, 2012, 11:27:31 PM
Jurassic Park The Game actually explains that the Dilophosaur's small size, frill, and spittable poison may have been caused by the DNA tampering.

We all know that? But the small size isn't because of DNA tampering. It's because it was young.

Nedry even comments on this in the film, "You're not as bad as your older brothers." Or something to that effect.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2012, 11:44:48 PM
You know what? I think I've found a plausible explanation for all of the neck snapping in JP3. No, it's not the frog genes. Instead, those dinos received genes from...

Spoiler
...Steven Seagal!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kkvexs3OKKk# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kkvexs3OKKk#)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2012, 11:54:37 PM
Quote from: Galliruler on Jun 21, 2012, 11:32:47 PM
Quote from: predxeno on Jun 21, 2012, 11:27:31 PM
Jurassic Park The Game actually explains that the Dilophosaur's small size, frill, and spittable poison may have been caused by the DNA tampering.

We all know that? But the small size isn't because of DNA tampering. It's because it was young.

Nedry even comments on this in the film, "You're not as bad as your older brothers." Or something to that effect.

I assumed the older brothers comment was directed at T.Rex and such. Yes, in reality they aren't related but if you want to talk about paleontology in the 90s, all large carnivorous dinosaurs were lumped together under the family Carnosauria.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2012, 12:03:35 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2012, 11:54:37 PM
I assumed the older brothers comment was directed at T.Rex and such. Yes, in reality they aren't related but if you want to talk about paleontology in the 90s, all large carnivorous dinosaurs were lumped together under the family Carnosauria.

"Big Brothers" was a reference to older Dilophosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Jun 22, 2012, 12:18:40 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2012, 12:03:35 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2012, 11:54:37 PM
I assumed the older brothers comment was directed at T.Rex and such. Yes, in reality they aren't related but if you want to talk about paleontology in the 90s, all large carnivorous dinosaurs were lumped together under the family Carnosauria.

"Big Brothers" was a reference to older Dilophosaurus.

Why would Nedry even know about them though? If he knew anything about dilophosaurs, especially how big they got, he would've known to avoid eye contact with a dinosaur that blinds its prey with venom.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Elliott on Jun 22, 2012, 12:32:01 AM
Quote from: Remonster on Jun 22, 2012, 12:18:40 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2012, 12:03:35 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2012, 11:54:37 PM
I assumed the older brothers comment was directed at T.Rex and such. Yes, in reality they aren't related but if you want to talk about paleontology in the 90s, all large carnivorous dinosaurs were lumped together under the family Carnosauria.

"Big Brothers" was a reference to older Dilophosaurus.

Why would Nedry even know about them though? If he knew anything about dilophosaurs, especially how big they got, he would've known to avoid eye contact with a dinosaur that blinds its prey with venom.

Nedry worked at a park with dinosaurs. He probably got taken through and shown the species. "Avoid this one, and this one. This one is poisonous and this one is harmless."

And Nedry wore glasses. Then he lost them. Maybe he couldn't see the dilophosaurus. Maybe he though it was a hypsolophydont or a Gallimimus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2012, 12:38:35 AM
Quote from: Remonster on Jun 22, 2012, 12:18:40 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2012, 12:03:35 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2012, 11:54:37 PM
I assumed the older brothers comment was directed at T.Rex and such. Yes, in reality they aren't related but if you want to talk about paleontology in the 90s, all large carnivorous dinosaurs were lumped together under the family Carnosauria.

"Big Brothers" was a reference to older Dilophosaurus.

Why would Nedry even know about them though? If he knew anything about dilophosaurs, especially how big they got, he would've known to avoid eye contact with a dinosaur that blinds its prey with venom.

Nedry knew about all the dinosaurs. Why would know to turn the fences off except the Raptors? He knew about the Dilophosaurus and about how big they got just probably assumed an infant was not a threat.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 22, 2012, 01:04:48 AM
That's likely. The squeaky noises sounded harmless enough.

Oh yeah, about the raptor fences. That's something that confuses the hell out of me. Why would all the fences EXCEPT that one be shut down, and more importantly, if he has the ability to pick and choose (I assume) which fences he turns off, why turn them off at all?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2012, 01:12:01 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 22, 2012, 01:04:48 AM
That's likely. The squeaky noises sounded harmless enough.

Oh yeah, about the raptor fences. That's something that confuses the hell out of me. Why would all the fences EXCEPT that one be shut down, and more importantly, if he has the ability to pick and choose (I assume) which fences he turns off, why turn them off at all?

He didn't turn the Raptor fences off because A) the Raptors were too intelligent to release, they might have killed him before he gets off the island and B) its scary and adds to the character of the Raptors.

Muldoon - "Damn it even Nedry knew better than to mess with the Raptor fences."

Also he turned off the fences to distract the staff whilst he made his escape and maybe even hoped the dinosaurs would kill off the staff.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 22, 2012, 01:22:15 AM
It couldn't have been because he hoped the dinosaurs would kill off all the staff. Nedry (at least in the book) planned to return and explain it all as "a simple thing" (to quote his speech from just before he shuts everything down).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Jun 22, 2012, 01:29:06 AM
First, I agree that the Older Brothers comment was referring to Rex and raptors and not to these "hypothetical" big Dilophosaurs.  All the EU points to the fact that the Dilophosaurs are all the same size.

Second, I think Nedry was able to turn off all the fences but chose to spare the Raptor pen.  I don't know how, but I think Nedry had to turn off all the fences if he wanted to get through them, he couldn't pick and choose.  The raptor enclosure seemed to be seperate from the electric fences surrounding the park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Elliott on Jun 22, 2012, 01:40:33 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Jun 22, 2012, 01:29:06 AM
First, I agree that the Older Brothers comment was referring to Rex and raptors and not to these "hypothetical" big Dilophosaurs.  All the EU points to the fact that the Dilophosaurs are all the same size.

Second, I think Nedry was able to turn off all the fences but chose to spare the Raptor pen.  I don't know how, but I think Nedry had to turn off all the fences if he wanted to get through them, he couldn't pick and choose.  The raptor enclosure seemed to be seperate from the electric fences surrounding the park.

The "hurrdurr hypothetical" big Dilophosaurs were also shown in the Lost World. Twice I believe. Once on the hunting script that Roland has on the Game Trail, and once more in the trailer on a computer screen as a screensaver.

And you're sorta' right about the fences. They park ran on multiple generators, but if I recall the raptors ran on a few extra in case of a power outage.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Jun 22, 2012, 01:42:57 AM
Quote from: Galliruler on Jun 22, 2012, 01:40:33 AM
The "hurrdurr hypothetical" big Dilophosaurs were also shown in the Lost World. Twice I believe. Once on the hunting script that Roland has on the Game Trail, and once more in the trailer on a computer screen as a screensaver.

I don't think there's any way to tell what size those dilos are on the screen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2012, 01:49:52 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Jun 22, 2012, 01:29:06 AM
First, I agree that the Older Brothers comment was referring to Rex and raptors and not to these "hypothetical" big Dilophosaurs.  All the EU points to the fact that the Dilophosaurs are all the same size.

The "Big Brother" is seen on screens in TLW.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fencyc%2Fdebates%2Fdilo.jpg&hash=d78c73fcfcf5f527431a81205875911e55673dfd)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fencyc%2Fdebates%2Fdilo2.jpg&hash=6358d2e534154df059c4e46958f850f33cf5cb2d)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fencyc%2Fdebates%2FDiloDebate.jpg&hash=1bf752607f6e839ecee1276ce2d3185eb6c1db23)

"20 feet long" people.

Collectors cards also show "Big Brother"

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages2.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20100919122510%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2F3%2F36%2FDilophosaurus_collector_card.jpg&hash=7289d94e33e88f0039b035cb7cd9eac0ab82a4ae)



Quote from: predxeno on Jun 22, 2012, 01:29:06 AM
I think Nedry had to turn off all the fences if he wanted to get through them, he couldn't pick and choose. The raptor enclosure seemed to be seperate from the electric fences surrounding the park.

Hammond - "Then why the hell did he turn the other ones off?"

Muldoon - "Damn it even Nedry knew better than to mess with the Raptor fences."

These two lines from people who run the park prove how Nedry had access to all the fences and was able to turn certain ones off.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Jun 22, 2012, 01:56:08 AM
We have no idea what those numbers mean on the screen with the Dilos.

Hammond and Muldoon don't know anything about Nedry's programming skills or what the programs Nedry made did.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jun 22, 2012, 01:57:44 AM
Quote from: Snowdog on Jun 21, 2012, 11:05:10 PM
I would like to see a mosasaur in the new JP movie. But what i would love to see is a Dimetrodon ;D
http://images.wikia.com/dinosaurs/images/e/ef/Dimetrodon.jpg

Dimetrodon is not even a Dinosaur. They exist before the Triassic Period, I doubt they will add any animal that exist before and after the Dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2012, 02:01:17 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Jun 22, 2012, 01:56:08 AM
We have no idea what those numbers mean on the screen with the Dilos.

Erm...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi45.tinypic.com%2F358cbrt.jpg&hash=6846d6d5323fe46ac30668cce14a5abea0bff582)

Quote from: predxeno on Jun 22, 2012, 01:56:08 AM
Hammond and Muldoon don't know anything about Nedry's programming skills or what the programs Nedry made did.

I'm pretty sure Hammond would have been aware of what Nedry was capable of before hiring him. Plus Arnold could have told them everything Nedry did.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Elliott on Jun 22, 2012, 02:08:04 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2012, 02:01:17 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Jun 22, 2012, 01:56:08 AM
We have no idea what those numbers mean on the screen with the Dilos.

Erm...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi45.tinypic.com%2F358cbrt.jpg&hash=6846d6d5323fe46ac30668cce14a5abea0bff582)

Quote from: predxeno on Jun 22, 2012, 01:56:08 AM
Hammond and Muldoon don't know anything about Nedry's programming skills or what the programs Nedry made did.

I'm pretty sure Hammond would have been aware of what Nedry was capable of before hiring him. Plus Arnold could have told them everything Nedry did.
Quote from: predxeno on Jun 22, 2012, 01:56:08 AM
We have no idea what those numbers mean on the screen with the Dilos.

Hammond and Muldoon don't know anything about Nedry's programming skills or what the programs Nedry made did.

I'm sorry, but LOL.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Jun 22, 2012, 02:18:27 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2012, 02:01:17 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Jun 22, 2012, 01:56:08 AM
We have no idea what those numbers mean on the screen with the Dilos.

Erm...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi45.tinypic.com%2F358cbrt.jpg&hash=6846d6d5323fe46ac30668cce14a5abea0bff582)

Quote from: predxeno on Jun 22, 2012, 01:56:08 AM
Hammond and Muldoon don't know anything about Nedry's programming skills or what the programs Nedry made did.

I'm pretty sure Hammond would have been aware of what Nedry was capable of before hiring him. Plus Arnold could have told them everything Nedry did.

That's information based on the real life Dilophosaur, not on the genetically engineered one.

Hammond and Arnold couldn't have known everything Nedry did, otherwise they would have stopped Nedry before he even sabotaged the park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2012, 02:26:47 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Jun 22, 2012, 02:18:27 AM
That's information based on the real life Dilophosaur, not on the genetically engineered one.

That's information based on a Dilophosaurus from the Jurassic Park series. Right from the InGen database, on a screen in the film! Site B has "Big bothers" on it and so did Isla Nublar because Nedry knew about them, hence why he said it.

Quote from: predxeno on Jun 22, 2012, 02:18:27 AM
Hammond and Arnold couldn't have known everything Nedry did, otherwise they would have stopped Nedry before he even sabotaged the park.

They knew how much access he had to the fences and how they were controlled. All this is seen in the film. Plus how were they to know Nedry's intentions?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Elliott on Jun 22, 2012, 02:28:10 AM
prexeno, that information, hell, that picture is of the Jurassic Park dilophosaurus!

Look at the skull! See how it's blunt like a tyrannosaur skull? That belongs to the JP dilophosaurs. A real dilophosaurus has a more slender skull.

IT EVEN SAYS INGEN IN THE TOP RIGHT.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: predxeno on Jun 22, 2012, 02:31:36 AM
Quote from: Galliruler on Jun 22, 2012, 02:28:10 AM
prexeno, that information, hell, that picture is of the Jurassic Park dilophosaurus!

Look at the skull! See how it's blunt like a tyrannosaur skull? That belongs to the JP dilophosaurs. A real dilophosaurus has a more slender skull.

IT EVEN SAYS INGEN IN THE TOP RIGHT.

Damn it, I guess you guys could be right but the producers of the sequel might not make the same deep observations you guys made.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 22, 2012, 03:56:44 AM
"I don't get it. It says InGen on the corner of that screen!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Elliott on Jun 22, 2012, 03:58:40 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 22, 2012, 03:56:44 AM
"I don't get it. It says InGen on the corner of that screen!"

"I don't get it. It says InGen on the side of that chopper! Why- why would Hammond send two teams?"

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 22, 2012, 04:19:43 AM
I've decided I'm going to build up my JP toy collection. I got rid of too many when I moved. This, is, happening!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 22, 2012, 04:20:24 AM
"DoomRulz! We've got DoomRulz here!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 22, 2012, 04:40:00 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 22, 2012, 04:19:43 AM
I've decided I'm going to build up my JP toy collection. I got rid of too many when I moved. This, is, happening!

I've got a shit load in my basement  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 22, 2012, 04:43:17 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 22, 2012, 04:40:00 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 22, 2012, 04:19:43 AM
I've decided I'm going to build up my JP toy collection. I got rid of too many when I moved. This, is, happening!

I've got a shit load in my basement  8)

As do I. My big T-Rex was (and still is) the highlight of my collection. I always did have more Star Wars figures than JP ones, though.

Although that one time I crossed them over was awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 22, 2012, 04:51:18 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgifsoup.com%2Fwebroot%2Fanimatedgifs%2F1058262_o.gif&hash=206e8c141321da18c83c4be225937792f214ad07)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 22, 2012, 05:37:49 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 22, 2012, 04:40:00 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 22, 2012, 04:19:43 AM
I've decided I'm going to build up my JP toy collection. I got rid of too many when I moved. This, is, happening!

I've got a shit load in my basement  8)

Pics or they don't exist!

Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 22, 2012, 04:43:17 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 22, 2012, 04:40:00 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 22, 2012, 04:19:43 AM
I've decided I'm going to build up my JP toy collection. I got rid of too many when I moved. This, is, happening!

I've got a shit load in my basement  8)

As do I. My big T-Rex was (and still is) the highlight of my collection. I always did have more Star Wars figures than JP ones, though.

Although that one time I crossed them over was awesome.

Which T.Rex do you have? I only have the Bull T.Rex from the 1st TLW line, sans caged accessory. I once had the Rex from the first JP line but I destroyed it as a child >_<
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jun 22, 2012, 06:43:01 AM
I had a bunch of toys, then I donated them. Spreading the JP love.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Blacklabel on Jun 22, 2012, 07:09:47 AM
Argh.. i donated mine many years ago...

had the large red t-rex.. the young trex.. the triceratops.. one raptor and a couple of dilophosaurus....

They went to an orphanage.. hope they made the kids happy :)

..however.. i recently found one Alan Grant and one mini pteranodon in the attic :laugh: both in bad shape :P (the pteranodon is missing one foot)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: XenoVC on Jun 22, 2012, 07:26:27 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Jun 22, 2012, 02:18:27 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2012, 02:01:17 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Jun 22, 2012, 01:56:08 AM
We have no idea what those numbers mean on the screen with the Dilos.

Erm...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi45.tinypic.com%2F358cbrt.jpg&hash=6846d6d5323fe46ac30668cce14a5abea0bff582)

Quote from: predxeno on Jun 22, 2012, 01:56:08 AM
Hammond and Muldoon don't know anything about Nedry's programming skills or what the programs Nedry made did.

I'm pretty sure Hammond would have been aware of what Nedry was capable of before hiring him. Plus Arnold could have told them everything Nedry did.

That's information based on the real life Dilophosaur, not on the genetically engineered one.


The TellTale JP Game website states the Dilophosaurus' seen in Jurassic Park not to be fully grown.

Happy now?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on Jun 22, 2012, 08:36:54 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jun 21, 2012, 10:14:44 PM
Quote from: Galliruler on Jun 21, 2012, 09:22:40 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 21, 2012, 08:34:07 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2012, 07:31:52 PM
I think to work with the notion that they are one in the same because a newly evolved raptor works within the realm of JP continuity, what with the DNA tampering.

Two different species. Even in the Trespasser game they acknowledged this.

This guy knows what's up.
Even from the behavior we can tell they're different species.
The ones from JP are extremely aggressive, and attack not to feed, but to kill. They hunt for pleasure.
The ones from TLW behave exactly alike. Examples include the long grass scene where the hunters were hunted by the velociraptors and killed for no reason. There was even a scene, when Sarah pulls the tiles off a hut's roof, where a Nublar falls onto another Nublar and they both fight. The two were male and female, fighting. (Now, here's where the proof comes in that they were the same species from the first movie.)
In that scene we see a pure brown velociraptor. This is the female. How do I know it's female? The velociraptors from the first film are brown as well, and they were all female.
The other velociraptor fighting the female is the new tiger-striped varient. This is the male. They appeared only in this movie. (Since this movie is trying to show a dinosaur ecosystem, not a park, with male and female varients of each dinosaur.)

Still don't believe me? Let's take a look at this picture...
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.wikia.com%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2F7%2F7e%2FLostWorld1.jpg&hash=105b46fa8350be54e7d57426c79b29a61a56d68e)
See the brown in the middle back, in front of the one in the trees? That's the female. The one on the left is the male.

And this is a female from the first movie;
http://www.rareresource.com/Blogs/uploaded_images/velociraptor-767508.jpg

And here are both the male, and female versions in Jurassic Park III.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg814.imageshack.us%2Fimg814%2F9770%2Fjp3malevelociraptorbyya.jpg&hash=0648927165bc3560b3a165d2c0febe4f8e6647ff)
These are the males.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg600.imageshack.us%2Fimg600%2F1256%2Fjp3femaleraptorcolorbyy.jpg&hash=e9dee6df70e3363989f216df59dd9a4d473a90ae)
And these are the females.

They in no way resemble the other velociraptors from the previous movies except for the simple fact that they are raptors, too. And how can a species of velociraptor evolve in like, what, seven years, into a completely differently behaved animal? They can't.

Listen to this nigga.


But yet when I said this however many pages back, I was shot down and made fun of.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2012, 11:00:54 AM
This is my collection...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Snowdog on Jun 22, 2012, 11:45:56 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2012, 11:00:54 AM
This is my collection...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws)

Dude !!!
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fclassicfun.ws%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Finternet-high-five-place-hand-here-right.jpg&hash=0a68447b4502c2e021eb47abb3d6d6e40624faed)

You like Alien3 and have as much Jurassic Park stuff as i have 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 22, 2012, 12:40:42 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 22, 2012, 05:37:49 AM
Which T.Rex do you have? I only have the Bull T.Rex from the 1st TLW line, sans caged accessory. I once had the Rex from the first JP line but I destroyed it as a child >_<

The Thrasher T-Rex. The big guy was awesome.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.wikia.com%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2F1%2F13%2F13125231997.jpg&hash=4ce5d665eb3e02557ddee8bc50e8bd5b0d1003e2)

For the most part, I kept great care of my toys as a child. Only one that I can recall getting damaged is my '98 Godzilla. He got sat on and lost a leg, and he lost a hand at another point. I had my dad reattach them in some pretty creative ways, though (that was another one of my favorite toys, after all :D )
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2012, 01:42:20 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on Jun 22, 2012, 11:45:56 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2012, 11:00:54 AM
This is my collection...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws)

Dude !!!
http://classicfun.ws/wp-content/uploads/internet-high-five-place-hand-here-right.jpg

You like Alien3 and have as much Jurassic Park stuff as i have 8)

*high fives*

Got a lot more stuff since that video was made and I'll also be making an Alien and Predator collection video in the neat future.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 22, 2012, 02:06:22 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2012, 11:00:54 AM
This is my collection...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws)


I remeber watching your video a long time ago!  :D

There's only two things that I have that I did not see in your video: the massive TLW Mobile Command Center Research Trailer and a remote control AAV Mercedes jeep.  I cut the wire cause I thought it looked too film accurate to have a cord sticking out.  I also have TLW T-Rex remote control for my 8th birthday.  That was AWESOME!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 22, 2012, 04:48:05 PM
Do you guys think it would be worth my while to actively pursue toys that are still in their original packaging?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 22, 2012, 05:01:07 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 22, 2012, 04:48:05 PM
Do you guys think it would be worth my while to actively pursue toys that are still in their original packaging?

If you're interested in resale value, I'd say go for it. Otherwise, you'd be buying a toy you can't play with.
----
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cCGeHIa4Pk# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cCGeHIa4Pk#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Taxemic on Jun 22, 2012, 05:37:54 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2012, 11:00:54 AM
This is my collection...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws)

I got to 18 minutes in and thought "I've seen enough". What an awesome collection! This brought back so many child hood memories. The only negative thing I'll say (much to my delight), and in a really childish manor is - I have things that you don't have, ner ner ner neeer ner.  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 22, 2012, 06:23:08 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2012, 11:00:54 AM
This is my collection...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws)

This is all sorts of impressive. I do remember seeing JP 3 toys being sold at one time but I never bought any because they didn't give me the same sense of awe that the older Kenner toys did. Seriously, why the bite size T.Rex and Spino? Ugh.

At least animatronic Spino was big, like the Bull Rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2012, 06:58:36 PM
I have more stuff now a 'My Jurassic Park Collection 2" video will be released soon. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 22, 2012, 08:12:18 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2012, 06:58:36 PM
I have more stuff now a 'My Jurassic Park Collection 2" video will be released soon. :P

ZOINKS!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: r888 on Jun 26, 2012, 05:02:51 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2012, 11:00:54 AM
This is my collection...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F24.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_ljdydwdprK1qbz75wo1_500.gif&hash=8e6e24a30cd8ad34fa4f68f17fa7dba20b9a7c5d)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 26, 2012, 03:55:44 PM
Who here played and finished JP: The Game? I only got around to episode 1 this past winter but it was pretty awesome all the same.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: KNIGHT on Jun 26, 2012, 06:08:22 PM
I played all four episodes, and loved them. i can understand why some people didn't like it, but personally I thought the game was brilliant.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Jun 26, 2012, 06:43:48 PM
I wanted to like the game sooo bad, but I just couldn't. Gave up at the start of episode 2.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 26, 2012, 07:03:16 PM
Are you guys talking about the one from TellTale?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 26, 2012, 08:29:14 PM
Yup. The only one that matters, too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jun 26, 2012, 09:22:08 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 26, 2012, 08:29:14 PM
Yup. The only one that matters, too.

I hope you mean story-wise. Because there are some sweeet JP games out there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 26, 2012, 09:25:35 PM
Not that many, really. Operation Genesis was good and The Chaos Continues was fun as well. Truthfully the best JP game I played until the TT game was the TLW Arcade.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 27, 2012, 09:22:14 AM
Operation Genesis rocks.

I just wish they made another version with updated gameplay and graphics.
And more Dinosaurs, of course.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jun 27, 2012, 10:34:32 AM
The Lost World was great and so was Warpath. But the best JP game is Operation Genesis IMO.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 27, 2012, 10:46:37 AM
Operation Genesis was the bomb!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-wDfLf_C0X6Y%2FT3xVkfPnxoI%2FAAAAAAAAFQw%2FIKhXqgDRKrE%2Fs1600%2FJurassic%2Bpark%2Boperation%2Bgenesis%2Bgames.jpg&hash=e7d6b325b2474e4cd46e8d21e0752c668d605ea3)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 27, 2012, 12:41:17 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jun 27, 2012, 10:34:32 AM
The Lost World was great and so was Warpath. But the best JP game is Operation Genesis IMO.

Warpath was definitely a game to play to let off serious steam, haha. All that button mashing made for some silly-looking dino fights.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 27, 2012, 01:26:07 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 27, 2012, 10:46:37 AM
Operation Genesis was the bomb!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-wDfLf_C0X6Y%2FT3xVkfPnxoI%2FAAAAAAAAFQw%2FIKhXqgDRKrE%2Fs1600%2FJurassic%2Bpark%2Boperation%2Bgenesis%2Bgames.jpg&hash=e7d6b325b2474e4cd46e8d21e0752c668d605ea3)

YES!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DaddyYautja on Jun 27, 2012, 03:39:54 PM
The best JP game was Jurassic Park 2: The Chaos Continues.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Jun 27, 2012, 03:52:36 PM
Quote from: DaddyYautja on Jun 27, 2012, 03:39:54 PM
The best JP game was Jurassic Park 2: The Chaos Continues.

YES. One hundred times yes. First Co-op game i ever played, and I played it with my brother more times than I can count. Fun, challenging and a great soundtrack.

Also, can we get a second JP:OG? I'm desperate.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 27, 2012, 04:16:22 PM
Lol, the good 'ol days...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVhtuEQ5QMs# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVhtuEQ5QMs#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: lozzy.94 on Jun 27, 2012, 06:07:31 PM
Are we forgetting how awesome Trespasser was?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 27, 2012, 06:51:51 PM
Quote from: lozzy.94 on Jun 27, 2012, 06:07:31 PM
Are we forgetting how awesome Trespasser was?

How awesome the cleavage was?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 29, 2012, 08:41:04 PM
Quote from: lozzy.94 on Jun 27, 2012, 06:07:31 PM
Are we forgetting how awesome Trespasser was?

Trespasser was a half-baked, steaming pile of crap. I can't believe that was actually released.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jun 30, 2012, 12:20:41 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 29, 2012, 08:41:04 PM
Quote from: lozzy.94 on Jun 27, 2012, 06:07:31 PM
Are we forgetting how awesome Trespasser was?

Trespasser was a half-baked, steaming pile of crap. I can't believe that was actually released.

Yeah, there were good concepts in it though. Shame the studio had to shut down and it was released unfinished.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Jun 30, 2012, 12:28:22 AM
The gamepay may have been absolute trash, but Hammonds memoirs were amazing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: shadowedge on Jun 30, 2012, 12:52:34 AM
Do we know if this movie is going to be CGI or animatronic puppets like the first film?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: KNIGHT on Jun 30, 2012, 01:45:22 AM
Probably both, like the first one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jun 30, 2012, 01:55:04 AM
I could only hope so. The combination in the first two was flawless.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 30, 2012, 02:13:34 AM
Don't fix what didn't break.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: evolution_rex on Jun 30, 2012, 03:23:46 AM
I made a list of directors I think could make a relatively good JP4. I'm only speaking hypothetically, not that any of them are likely. They're in no specific order:

1. Peter Jackson
2. James Cameron
3. JJ Abrams
4. Gereth Edwards
5. Gore Verbinski
6. Rupart Wyatt
7. Frank Marshall
8. Ridley Scott
9. Alfonso Cuarón
10. Tobe Hooper
11. Christopher Nolan
12. Guillermo del Toro
13. Joseph Kosinski
14. Roland Emmerich
15. Joe Carnahan
16. Sam Raimi
17. Zack Snyder
18. David Yates
19. Andrew Stanton
20. Gary Ross
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jun 30, 2012, 04:29:44 AM
Quote from: evolution_rex on Jun 30, 2012, 03:23:46 AM
14. Roland Emmerich
17. Zack Snyder
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi0.kym-cdn.com%2Fphotos%2Fimages%2Foriginal%2F000%2F232%2F114%2Fe39.png&hash=76461eba469ac8974a7f740b90a23da23d4adff2)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 30, 2012, 04:30:16 AM
Emmerich is fine with me!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jun 30, 2012, 04:44:12 AM
Its just... I like directors who inspire good performances from actors... or deliver on a script properly... or don't just create a clusterf**k of visual effects to cushion a movie without any substance...

...Y... y'know?  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 30, 2012, 04:57:45 AM
..................................I still like Emmerich.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DJ Pu$$yface on Jun 30, 2012, 05:03:35 AM
I have a sick curiosity in seeing what the Strause Brothers could do with a JP movie...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: r888 on Jun 30, 2012, 05:38:39 AM
Quote from: DJ Pu$$yface on Jun 30, 2012, 05:03:35 AM
I have a sick curiosity in seeing what the Strause Brothers could do with a JP movie...

DEAR GOD NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 30, 2012, 07:01:26 AM
Quote from: Jayden the Omnipotent on Jun 30, 2012, 01:45:22 AM
Probably both, like the first one.
Like all three, you mean. :laugh:

Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 30, 2012, 04:57:45 AM
..................................I still like Emmerich.
Me too, but it's unlikely he changes back to his pre-The Day after Tomorrow self.
Certainly don't want 2012 Emmerich onboard for a Jurassic Park film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jun 30, 2012, 08:58:00 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Jun 30, 2012, 04:44:12 AM
Its just... I like directors who inspire good performances from actors... or deliver on a script properly... or don't just create a clusterf**k of visual effects to cushion a movie without any substance...

...Y... y'know?  :-\

Zack Snyder is a perfectly fine director. His weakest movie (Sucker Punch) failed because he got to write it. And he proved not to be very good at it.
He'd not fit this though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jun 30, 2012, 09:11:15 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jun 30, 2012, 08:58:00 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Jun 30, 2012, 04:44:12 AM
Its just... I like directors who inspire good performances from actors... or deliver on a script properly... or don't just create a clusterf**k of visual effects to cushion a movie without any substance...

...Y... y'know?  :-\

Zack Snyder is a perfectly fine director. His weakest movie (Sucker Punch) failed because he got to write it. And he proved not to be very good at it.
He'd not fit this though.
Yeah, in this case I wasn't referring to Zack Snyder, but Emmerich. The reason I listed him though was because he's the opposite of what Jurassic Park needs, seeing as he likes to inject a very specific style into his movies.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jun 30, 2012, 09:12:36 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Jun 30, 2012, 09:11:15 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jun 30, 2012, 08:58:00 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Jun 30, 2012, 04:44:12 AM
Its just... I like directors who inspire good performances from actors... or deliver on a script properly... or don't just create a clusterf**k of visual effects to cushion a movie without any substance...

...Y... y'know?  :-\

Zack Snyder is a perfectly fine director. His weakest movie (Sucker Punch) failed because he got to write it. And he proved not to be very good at it.
He'd not fit this though.
Yeah, in this case I wasn't referring to Zack Snyder, but Emmerich. The reason I listed him though was because he's the opposite of what Jurassic Park needs, seeing as he likes to inject a very specific style into his movies.

Oh, I get it. Yeah, I agree with you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 30, 2012, 09:14:09 AM
The only director who can make a great Jurassic Park sequel (other than Spielberg of course) is Rupart Wyatt. He has the right style and knows how to use C.G.I in the right way.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 30, 2012, 09:15:35 AM
Johnston did very little 'bad'... needed a better script. He certainly knows how to create atmosphere.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 30, 2012, 09:16:45 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jun 30, 2012, 09:15:35 AM
Johnston did very little 'bad'... needed a better script. He certainly knows how to create atmosphere.

After Captain America? No.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 30, 2012, 09:18:01 AM
Captain America rocks.

;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jun 30, 2012, 11:46:14 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 30, 2012, 09:16:45 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jun 30, 2012, 09:15:35 AM
Johnston did very little 'bad'... needed a better script. He certainly knows how to create atmosphere.

After Captain America? No.

ohboyherewego.jpg
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 30, 2012, 02:10:44 PM
Cap was great, and JPIII had no real directing problems. Like OZ said, the problems lied in the script. I would love for Johnston to return if Spielberg doesn't.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jun 30, 2012, 04:52:56 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 30, 2012, 02:10:44 PM
Cap was great, and JPIII had no real directing problems. Like OZ said, the problems lied in the script. I would love for Johnston to return if Spielberg doesn't.

Totally agree.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jun 30, 2012, 06:09:15 PM
You can't blame him on JP3. I remember him saying sorry for the film and that they rush out the script so that they can start filming soon. He is not that bad of a director since he has directed a few good films before.

Quote from: Space Sweeper on Jun 30, 2012, 04:44:12 AM
Its just... I like directors who inspire good performances from actors... or deliver on a script properly... or don't just create a clusterf**k of visual effects to cushion a movie without any substance...

I pretty much agree since Emmerich is like Micheal Bay without the stupid slapstick humor in his movies. He might have directed a few decent films but I don't think he is the right choice for a Jurassic Park movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Jun 30, 2012, 07:35:46 PM
Emmerich is a big fat no from me. Would like to see Snyder do something a little more reserved visually, more like Watchmen or Dawn of the Dead than 300 or Sucker Punch.

My number one choice is still Brad Bird.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shasvre on Jun 30, 2012, 07:38:33 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Jun 30, 2012, 07:35:46 PMWould like to see Snyder do something a little more reserved visually, more like Watchmen or Dawn of the Dead than 300 or Sucker Punch.

According to Snyder himself, Man of Steel is going to be just that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 30, 2012, 07:57:28 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Jun 30, 2012, 07:35:46 PM
My number one choice is still Brad Bird.

Whoa, why did I not think of this? :o Excellent choice.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on Jun 30, 2012, 08:01:02 PM
Quote from: r888 on Jun 30, 2012, 05:38:39 AM
Quote from: DJ Pu$$yface on Jun 30, 2012, 05:03:35 AM
I have a sick curiosity in seeing what the Strause Brothers could do with a JP movie...

DEAR GOD NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA YES. Let's ping the question
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 30, 2012, 08:46:29 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 30, 2012, 02:10:44 PM
Cap was great, and JPIII had no real directing problems. Like OZ said, the problems lied in the script. I would love for Johnston to return if Spielberg doesn't.

I can see that now and kinda agree after seeing Cap. But at the end of the day, he was still OK with the script in JP III so I think he shares part of the blame.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 30, 2012, 09:26:15 PM
McG anynone?

Just kidding.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Jun 30, 2012, 11:33:59 PM
Anyone else not interested in Spielberg returning? I'd personally like to see a more mature Jurassic Park, and I don't think he'd deliver.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 01, 2012, 12:03:43 AM
What
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Jul 01, 2012, 12:29:38 AM
I was perfectly clear. I don't want JP4 to shy away from violence and mature themes, and I think that Spielberg would keep make it a movie more focused on children.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 01, 2012, 12:33:51 AM
The first Jurassic Park handled mature themes very well, while still keeping the movie accessible to the family as a whole. Spielberg made controversial and complex concepts such as cloning work at a mature enough level while still keeping the film fun and (to a certain extent) child-friendly (and lets face it, a lot of us were very young when we were first introduced to Jurassic Park, and I'm sure it captivated all of us, otherwise we wouldn't be discussing it right now).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 01, 2012, 03:36:05 AM
I would hate if the 4th JP turned out looking like how the new Judge Dredd is.  I already know I'm still going to prefer the Stallone version a lot more.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Vepariga on Jul 01, 2012, 03:45:40 AM
Aslong as they dont have some annoying kid that runs away or Raptors with mohawks Im pretty keen for it.

I hope there is a cameo apperance of one of the main cast from the first film in it too,not a lead,but a cameo.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 01, 2012, 05:35:23 AM
At least give Malcolm a full part  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Sso02V on Jul 01, 2012, 07:37:52 AM
Somebody needs to blow a damn raptor up with a rocket launcher.

Hell, I'd settle for one just being shot to death. They keep bringing all these guns, but they never actually shoot any dinosaurs. Are they just trying to stay one step ahead of whiny hippies?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 01, 2012, 02:57:22 PM
Quote from: Sso02V on Jul 01, 2012, 07:37:52 AM
Somebody needs to blow a damn raptor up with a rocket launcher.

Hell, I'd settle for one just being shot to death. They keep bringing all these guns, but they never actually shoot any dinosaurs. Are they just trying to stay one step ahead of whiny hippies?

lmao  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: robertmartin on Jul 01, 2012, 03:37:58 PM
is this happening or not?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jul 01, 2012, 04:49:08 PM
Quote from: robertmartin on Jul 01, 2012, 03:37:58 PM
is this happening or not?

It apparently is. Check out the most recent news.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Remonster on Jul 01, 2012, 05:41:26 PM
Quote from: Sso02V on Jul 01, 2012, 07:37:52 AM
Somebody needs to blow a damn raptor up with a rocket launcher.

Hell, I'd settle for one just being shot to death. They keep bringing all these guns, but they never actually shoot any dinosaurs. Are they just trying to stay one step ahead of whiny hippies?

When they first showed off the Barret .50 cal with exploding rounds in JP3, I immediately thought they would blow up a raptor. At least something.

I was very disappointed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on Jul 01, 2012, 08:51:37 PM
Not an AUG, .50Cal, Airplane, nor A T-REX can stop the Spinosaurus.


Oh, wait, a bunch of oil and fire apparently does.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 01, 2012, 10:43:12 PM
I don't think they had a chance to actually use any of that stuff. A few gunshots are fired but that's only AFTER they run back to the plane.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 02, 2012, 06:48:14 AM
And judging by how fast the Spino was and by how it literally had no damage on it, I'd say they missed all of the shots. Can't blame them mind you. One thing is hearing stories about the San Diego incident -- one thing is finding yourself in front of a f**king 45 (more or less) bipedal lizard, pissed off as all hell, charging at you because it's just put you on the menù.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2012, 09:13:46 AM
Its a rule in the Jurassic Park films that you can't shoot a dinosaur. If you try you die.

Robert Muldoon
Eddie Carr
Dieter Stark
Cooper

Only tranquilizer rifles are acceptable and only Alan Grant can get away with this.
Roland Tembo tried but had the shells taken away and then he used a tranquilizer.

You can stab a dinosaur (even with gymnastics >:(), and have dinosaurs eaten by other dinosaurs but no one can shoot one with a gun. I hope the writers of JPIV remember this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: severen76 on Jul 02, 2012, 12:51:01 PM
It was poor weapons choice on Cooper's part. The Barrett he had wouldve taken ages to set up. I bet he went to Hudson's school of bad-assery and overcompensating.

I did enjoy the seens he was in, and would've liked the contractors to survive a little longer so there could've been a little more dino action. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DaddyYautja on Jul 02, 2012, 12:51:45 PM
Back to video games; anyone here heard of Dino D-Day? I just found out about this game while looking at a free dino mmo Dinostorm.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8l2Syx_TfI#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8l2Syx_TfI#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jul 02, 2012, 12:58:48 PM
Quote from: DaddyYautja on Jul 02, 2012, 12:51:45 PM
Back to video games; anyone here heard of Dino D-Day? I just found out about this game while looking at a free dino mmo Dinostorm.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8l2Syx_TfI#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8l2Syx_TfI#ws)

Yes, it's quite fun actually. But the fact it's semi-dead makes me sad. There should be more people playing online. :(

Primal Carnage looks better anyway:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxOssrojWsg#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxOssrojWsg#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 02, 2012, 02:09:40 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jul 02, 2012, 12:58:48 PM
Quote from: DaddyYautja on Jul 02, 2012, 12:51:45 PM
Back to video games; anyone here heard of Dino D-Day? I just found out about this game while looking at a free dino mmo Dinostorm.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8l2Syx_TfI#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8l2Syx_TfI#ws)

Yes, it's quite fun actually. But the fact it's semi-dead makes me sad. There should be more people playing online. :(

Primal Carnage looks better anyway:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxOssrojWsg#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxOssrojWsg#ws)

Holy shit.  That looks pretty good.  Is that recent?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jul 02, 2012, 03:56:38 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jul 02, 2012, 02:09:40 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jul 02, 2012, 12:58:48 PM
Quote from: DaddyYautja on Jul 02, 2012, 12:51:45 PM
Back to video games; anyone here heard of Dino D-Day? I just found out about this game while looking at a free dino mmo Dinostorm.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8l2Syx_TfI#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8l2Syx_TfI#ws)

Yes, it's quite fun actually. But the fact it's semi-dead makes me sad. There should be more people playing online. :(

Primal Carnage looks better anyway:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxOssrojWsg#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxOssrojWsg#ws)

Holy shit.  That looks pretty good.  Is that recent?

Yes, the game's supposed to launch later this year.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on Jul 02, 2012, 03:57:19 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQTRHjlNOzM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQTRHjlNOzM#ws)


Interest piqued.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jul 02, 2012, 04:00:55 PM
Quote from: Gate on Jul 02, 2012, 03:57:19 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQTRHjlNOzM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQTRHjlNOzM#ws)


Interest piqued.

Heard it sucks a few times already.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 02, 2012, 04:13:54 PM
Primal Carnage?? Who said that? Testing isn't available to the public yet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2012, 05:18:39 PM
Quote from: Gate on Jul 02, 2012, 03:57:19 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQTRHjlNOzM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQTRHjlNOzM#ws)


Interest piqued.

That looks awful.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jul 02, 2012, 05:29:01 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2012, 09:13:46 AM
Its a rule in the Jurassic Park films that you can't shoot a dinosaur. If you try you die.

The man speaks the truth.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3XEsy--9vE# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3XEsy--9vE#)


Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2012, 05:18:39 PM
Quote from: Gate on Jul 02, 2012, 03:57:19 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQTRHjlNOzM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQTRHjlNOzM#ws)


Interest piqued.

That looks awful.

Looks like Sister Hood of the Traveling Pants meets Jurassic Park by way of The Grey.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 02, 2012, 06:22:37 PM
Quote from: Gate on Jul 02, 2012, 03:57:19 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQTRHjlNOzM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQTRHjlNOzM#ws)


Interest piqued.

Where did the Jeep come from?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 05, 2012, 11:26:12 AM
f**king shaky cam.

I understand it's easy to do low-budget films with that technique, but sheesh.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 05, 2012, 05:11:53 PM
Everytime I listen to John Williams' "Welcome to Jurassic Park", I cry. I've never been so impacted by a film score before. Anyone else ever feel tingly when they hear it?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jul 05, 2012, 05:17:26 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 05, 2012, 05:11:53 PM
Everytime I listen to John Williams' "Welcome to Jurassic Park", I cry. I've never been so impacted by a film score before. Anyone else ever feel tingly when they hear it?

You're not alone, bro. It's simply beautiful.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pf4mq4OaUBY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pf4mq4OaUBY#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jul 05, 2012, 05:19:00 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 05, 2012, 05:11:53 PM
Everytime I listen to John Williams' "Welcome to Jurassic Park", I cry. I've never been so impacted by a film score before. Anyone else ever feel tingly when they hear it?

Tingly yes. Always conjurers memories if the summer of 93 and anticipating the film before release. I remember mowing my lawn and mach 4 before going on a double date to see it for the first time. My date was also gorgeous.

Can't say I get emotional for listening to it. That is reserved for Elliot Smiths version of the Beatles song Because from the American Beauty soundtrack.   :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 05, 2012, 05:19:43 PM
Jurassic park is one of my favorite (if not my number one favorite) film soundtracks. Beautiful, beautiful music...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 05, 2012, 05:23:17 PM
I hope the original tune makes it back in JP IV and not some silly remix. I didn't like the score used in JP 3.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jul 05, 2012, 05:27:19 PM
If they don't get Williams, I think John Debney would be fine. Predators' soundtrack was a perfect homage to the original.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgmwVr6hEb4# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgmwVr6hEb4#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jul 05, 2012, 05:29:40 PM
Quote from: Gate on Jul 02, 2012, 03:57:19 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQTRHjlNOzM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQTRHjlNOzM#ws)


Interest piqued.
:laugh:

I was just laughing the whole way through, looks terrible.  :laugh:

Especially the Cloverfield-eske "woo-hoo" intro.



If they can't get Williams, my vote goes for James Howard Newton.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Gate on Jul 05, 2012, 07:18:15 PM
My standards fro movies must not be very high.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: RagingDragon on Jul 05, 2012, 07:33:11 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Jul 05, 2012, 05:19:00 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 05, 2012, 05:11:53 PM
Everytime I listen to John Williams' "Welcome to Jurassic Park", I cry. I've never been so impacted by a film score before. Anyone else ever feel tingly when they hear it?

Tingly yes. Always conjurers memories if the summer of 93 and anticipating the film before release. I remember mowing my lawn and mach 4 before going on a double date to see it for the first time. My date was also gorgeous.

Can't say I get emotional for listening to it. That is reserved for Elliot Smiths version of the Beatles song Because from the American Beauty soundtrack.   :'(
Have it.  Love it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jul 05, 2012, 08:27:18 PM
This thread should just be renamed to 'Jurassic Park' seeing as we cover all aspects of it here.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 05, 2012, 08:49:42 PM
Said that before myself. Perhaps they'll listen to you, since when I said that everyone was like 'SHIT NO'.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: War Wager on Jul 05, 2012, 08:57:12 PM
Might as well.

What happens when the JPIV train starts a rollin' though?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jul 05, 2012, 08:59:36 PM
Just keep it the same, I say. The Halo thread has kept the same name through five games. Maybe called it 'Jurassic Park (Franchise)' or '(Series)'.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park
Post by: Cvalda on Jul 05, 2012, 09:01:32 PM
Best to have dropped that numeral anyway, because this film will never happen. >:]

Spoiler
Sorry, but you know it's true.
Spoiler
Perpetual development helllllllllllllllll
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park franchise
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jul 05, 2012, 09:22:06 PM
Cvalda with dat cynical/clinical depression.  :laugh:

It WILL happen. Chaos theory actually predicts it. It's inevitable. Er, uh ... Life finds a way.

Spoiler
And even if it doesn't ... I have something cooking that will tickle one or two of your dinosaur bones.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park franchise
Post by: Cvalda on Jul 05, 2012, 09:25:57 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Jul 05, 2012, 09:22:06 PM
It WILL happen. Chaos theory actually predicts it. It's inevitable. Er, uh ... Life finds a way.
You're absolutely right...

Spoiler
...and I predict it will be the greatest money maker of all time!
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.counter-currents.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F01%2Fthe-amazing-criswell.jpg&hash=96e404fdd93064d99b12b8723e46d45a0ab5717d)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park
Post by: evolution_rex on Jul 05, 2012, 09:53:45 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jul 05, 2012, 09:01:32 PM
Best to have dropped that numeral anyway, because this film will never happen. >:]

Spoiler
Sorry, but you know it's true.
Spoiler
Perpetual development helllllllllllllllll
[close]
[close]
Eh, I totally understand why people would think this, but with the news recently, it's hard not to get your hopes up. I'm optimistic, I think they'll actually do it this time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park franchise
Post by: RagingDragon on Jul 06, 2012, 02:17:28 AM
Jurassic Park 4: Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
Title: Re: Jurassic Park franchise
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 06, 2012, 02:19:28 AM
Quote from: RagingDragon on Jul 06, 2012, 02:17:28 AM
Jurassic Park 4: Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

Raptors helped evolve us :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 06, 2012, 04:40:17 AM
Hey!  The thread title changed!   :o

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 05, 2012, 05:23:17 PM
I hope the original tune makes it back in JP IV and not some silly remix. I didn't like the score used in JP 3.

I thought Don Davis did a wonderful job.

Favorite original theme for the film which sounds very Willams-esque...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcxX-ggmg1w#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcxX-ggmg1w#ws)

Another favorite...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYELIaJZ0Jk#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYELIaJZ0Jk#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park franchise
Post by: evolution_rex on Jul 06, 2012, 05:47:48 AM
Another interested in some big fan fiction and films?

Here is Prime Survival, directed by Jack De La Mare: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-6cfumntM8#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-6cfumntM8#ws)

Then there is the upcoming Jurassic Park Origins: http://www.jporigins.com/ (http://www.jporigins.com/)

There is also Secrets of InGen: http://www.jplegacy.org/board/showthread.php?t=18518 (http://www.jplegacy.org/board/showthread.php?t=18518)

And then there is a fan fiction a friend and I have been writing. Not near as popular as these fan films seem to be but hopefully it'll gain some attention later: http://www.jplegacy.org/board/showthread.php?t=22237 (http://www.jplegacy.org/board/showthread.php?t=22237)

I'm a personal fan of Jurassic Park fan fiction. I often find myself reading fake Jurassic Park IV scripts just because it's really fun. Some of them are pretty bad, but I've read a few really good ones.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park franchise
Post by: severen76 on Jul 06, 2012, 10:19:00 AM
Origins looks like its going to be an amazing fan film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 06, 2012, 02:41:03 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jul 05, 2012, 09:01:32 PM
Best to have dropped that numeral anyway, because this film will never happen. >:]

Spoiler
Sorry, but you know it's true.
Spoiler
Perpetual development helllllllllllllllll
[close]
[close]

They have writers working on it now. I doubt you are correct, madame.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park franchise
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jul 13, 2012, 02:59:28 AM
A little something I whipped up last week.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5uUJ9Mlz2o#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5uUJ9Mlz2o#ws)


Spoiler
Werewolf project is on hold until fall/winter 2012. Prepping this currently for shooting in a few weeks and into August if everything works out. Mostly for fun and to get back into experimental film making and dabble in some animation and After Effects waters.

Spoiler
Some of you I may have approached to be involved in some capacity. If I haven't, and you are interested, shoot me a PM and we'll go from there.
[close]
[close]


Title: Re: Jurassic Park franchise
Post by: RagingDragon on Jul 13, 2012, 08:07:53 AM
^ Excellent!  I was wondering how it was going... I need to warm up the business hand anyway. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park franchise
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 14, 2012, 06:15:08 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Jul 13, 2012, 02:59:28 AM
A little something I whipped up last week.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5uUJ9Mlz2o#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5uUJ9Mlz2o#ws)


Spoiler
Werewolf project is on hold until fall/winter 2012. Prepping this currently for shooting in a few weeks and into August if everything works out. Mostly for fun and to get back into experimental film making and dabble in some animation and After Effects waters.

Spoiler
Some of you I may have approached to be involved in some capacity. If I haven't, and you are interested, shoot me a PM and we'll go from there.
[close]
[close]

Well, you have my attention. PMing you!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park franchise
Post by: War Wager on Jul 21, 2012, 11:42:22 PM
http://worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=25525&count=0 (http://worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=25525&count=0)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park franchise
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jul 21, 2012, 11:53:39 PM
I'm cautiously optimistic for Jurassic Park IV.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park franchise
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jul 22, 2012, 01:21:22 AM
2014 seems likely if the script goes across nicely.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park franchise
Post by: King Rathalos on Jul 22, 2012, 02:19:10 AM
Quote from: War Wager on Jul 21, 2012, 11:42:22 PM
http://worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=25525&count=0 (http://worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=25525&count=0)

QuoteThat's what's gonna be great about it, technology hass taken a leap now that we can really do some great things," he said, adding that the dinosaurs won't all be CGI because practical effects feel more realistic to audiences.

This right here makes me so happy, great to know they'll be keeping the animatronic dinosaurs. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park franchise
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 22, 2012, 03:44:54 AM
YEEESSSSSSS!!!!!!!

Closer than ever now!  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park franchise
Post by: r888 on Jul 22, 2012, 03:54:34 AM
Can we have dinosaurs in the city again?
I like that in the lost world  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park franchise
Post by: evolution_rex on Jul 22, 2012, 04:11:37 AM
Quote from: r888 on Jul 22, 2012, 03:54:34 AM
Can we have dinosaurs in the city again?
I like that in the lost world  :)
No reasonable story have the the "dinosaurs in the city" plot, IMO. It's been done in TLW, and just sounds like it'll be nothing more than dinosaurs chasing and eating people in a city. Which, I think they'll want to avoid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park franchise
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jul 22, 2012, 04:29:44 AM
2014 has Transformers 4, The Amazing Spider-Man 2, X-Men: First Class 2, The Good Dinosaur, Dawn of the Planet of the Apes, Ninja Trules, How to Train Your Dragon 2, Guardians of the Galaxy, The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1, Godzilla, and now JP4. 2014 can't handle so many awesome stuff at once!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park franchise
Post by: DJ Pu$$yface on Jul 22, 2012, 07:44:44 AM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Jul 22, 2012, 04:29:44 AM
2014 has Transformers 4, The Amazing Spider-Man 2, X-Men: First Class 2, The Good Dinosaur, Dawn of the Planet of the Apes, Ninja Trules, How to Train Your Dragon 2, Guardians of the Galaxy, The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1, Godzilla, and now JP4. 2014 can't handle so many awesome stuff at once!

Bleh.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park franchise
Post by: ScardyFox on Jul 22, 2012, 07:50:23 AM
Is that a bleh from a year long wait?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park franchise
Post by: DJ Pu$$yface on Jul 22, 2012, 08:07:04 AM
Quote from: ScardyFox on Jul 22, 2012, 07:50:23 AM
Is that a bleh from a year long wait?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Fyar4wJ3-Y# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Fyar4wJ3-Y#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park franchise
Post by: ScardyFox on Jul 22, 2012, 08:08:16 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9_6-A3qKug# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9_6-A3qKug#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park franchise
Post by: r888 on Jul 22, 2012, 08:11:02 AM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Jul 22, 2012, 04:29:44 AM
2014 has Transformers 4, The Amazing Spider-Man 2, X-Men: First Class 2, The Good Dinosaur, Dawn of the Planet of the Apes, Ninja Trules, How to Train Your Dragon 2, Guardians of the Galaxy, The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1, Godzilla, and now JP4. 2014 can't handle so many awesome stuff at once!


Yep 2014 is going to be the shit
Title: Re: Jurassic Park franchise
Post by: Pred-man201 on Jul 22, 2012, 08:24:00 AM
Quote from: r888 on Jul 22, 2012, 08:11:02 AM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Jul 22, 2012, 04:29:44 AM
2014 has Transformers 4, The Amazing Spider-Man 2, X-Men: First Class 2, The Good Dinosaur, Dawn of the Planet of the Apes, Ninja Trules, How to Train Your Dragon 2, Guardians of the Galaxy, The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1, Godzilla, and now JP4. 2014 can't handle so many awesome stuff at once!




Yep 2014 is going to be the shit

Its great to see all of those movies, but im not sure about transformers 4, every time they make a new one it gets worse, the first one was good the second was alright, the third isnt that good so im not sure if transformers 4.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park franchise
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jul 22, 2012, 06:15:42 PM
The Transformers movies make a lot of movie since a lot of causal movie goers enjoy them. So there will likely be hype for a 4th film since the third movie made over 1 billion worldwide. It will be 13 years since Jurassic Park 3 came out in 2014, I hope people care enough for another film. I don't want it to be like Scream 4 where most people are like "Who cares?".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park franchise
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 22, 2012, 06:51:00 PM
Quote from: War Wager on Jul 21, 2012, 11:42:22 PM
http://worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=25525&count=0 (http://worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=25525&count=0)

You've made my day. Thank you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park franchise
Post by: DaddyYautja on Jul 22, 2012, 07:39:44 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Jul 22, 2012, 06:15:42 PM
The Transformers movies make a lot of movie since a lot of causal movie goers enjoy them. So there will likely be hype for a 4th film since the third movie made over 1 billion worldwide. It will be 13 years since Jurassic Park 3 came out in 2014, I hope people care enough for another film. I don't want it to be like Scream 4 where most people are like "Who cares?".

I cant understand how these films made so much cash. I just keep saying that Transformers is reeeeeeally popular.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 22, 2012, 08:10:54 PM
Did you just change it to series?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Mercenary on Jul 22, 2012, 09:24:42 PM
Hey i know what would be great for JP4, Burt Gummer!!!! have the king of the hunters killing Dinos instead of Graboids.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 22, 2012, 09:31:30 PM
JP4 needs more... Dodgson!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4iTHzF2Qvk# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4iTHzF2Qvk#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DJ Pu$$yface on Jul 22, 2012, 09:31:50 PM
Quote from: The Mercenary on Jul 22, 2012, 09:24:42 PM
Hey i know what would be great for JP4, Burt Gummer!!!! have the king of the hunters killing Dinos instead of Graboids.

No.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 23, 2012, 12:01:20 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jul 22, 2012, 09:31:30 PM
JP4 needs more... Dodgson!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4iTHzF2Qvk# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4iTHzF2Qvk#)

lmao
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jul 23, 2012, 12:14:41 AM
Oh, great. Never gonna be able to watch that scene without remembering that video now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 23, 2012, 12:20:56 AM
Quote from: The Mercenary on Jul 22, 2012, 09:24:42 PM
Hey i know what would be great for JP4, Burt Gummer!!!! have the king of the hunters killing Dinos instead of Graboids.

You know, I really like you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 23, 2012, 07:09:25 AM
Jurassic Park 4 needs a slow, tension building set up. NOT, I repeat, NOT dream talking Raptors before we have even landed on the Island. It also needs the female Tyrannosaurus back as the big predator.

Bring on 2014!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 23, 2012, 07:23:05 AM
ALAN.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6s9sjPzyQjk#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6s9sjPzyQjk#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 23, 2012, 07:26:59 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jul 23, 2012, 07:23:05 AM
ALAN.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6s9sjPzyQjk#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6s9sjPzyQjk#ws)

Lowest point in the entire franchise.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jul 23, 2012, 07:30:13 AM
Hah, no.

The lowest point started at 2:14
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2h8rH8zxA64#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2h8rH8zxA64#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 23, 2012, 07:51:10 AM
Top 2 worst moments in the JP franchise.

1. Alan's dream
2. Gymnastic Raptor kill

Alan's dream only tops it in my books because it removes any build up to seeing the dinosaurs again, especially the Raptors, who in this film are one of the main focal points. To see it and have it talking before we get to the island was such a bad idea.

Kelly's gymnastics are stupid too but this was Spielberg's "Shark jumping on the boat" scene. He does it with nearly every movie. This is a scene where something incredible happens and its believable because you're gripped with the story. With E.T its the flying bikes, Jurassic Park its the T-rex saving them from the Raptors, in War of the Worlds its Ray taking down a tripod with a grenade, in Indiana Jones its the super natural stuff that's real.

I agree however that his jumping shark moment does not work for TLW.   
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 23, 2012, 12:29:45 PM
What was so bad about the raptor/gymnastic scene?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Keg on Jul 23, 2012, 12:34:11 PM
It was just corny as hell and the acting was terrible. But to me it was no worse than Lex's mufty chufty face when she releases the door locks on the computer at the end of the first film. I don't know why but the look on her face at that moment always made me want to punch her square in the pyat!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 23, 2012, 12:52:42 PM
Another low point was the removal of this line from the first film:
Spoiler
"Tim stop patting Lex's chair and get the f**k over here! Ellie can't reach the gun. MAKE YOURSELF USEFUL for f**ks sake!"
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 23, 2012, 01:07:31 PM
dem plot functions
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Jul 23, 2012, 02:04:28 PM
Sam Jackson's dramatic severed arm.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 23, 2012, 02:22:34 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 23, 2012, 12:52:42 PM
Another low point was the removal of this line from the first film:
Spoiler
"Tim stop patting Lex's chair and get the f**k over here! Ellie can't reach the gun. MAKE YOURSELF USEFUL for f**ks sake!"
[close]

Lmao 

Tell me about it  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 23, 2012, 04:09:45 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jul 23, 2012, 02:22:34 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 23, 2012, 12:52:42 PM
Another low point was the removal of this line from the first film:
Spoiler
"Tim stop patting Lex's chair and get the f**k over here! Ellie can't reach the gun. MAKE YOURSELF USEFUL for f**ks sake!"
[close]

Lmao 

Tell me about it  :laugh:

That was always a problem for me, even when I was really young. I wish they had done something, anything, to give a a reason why Tim couldn't get the gun.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 25, 2012, 11:55:33 PM
JACK POT!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufkYcz3Ec44# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufkYcz3Ec44#)

You're welcome mates  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 29, 2012, 06:48:48 PM
You really, need a new emulator.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Jul 29, 2012, 07:01:15 PM
get Mame32 and go to CoolRom.com.

download your program, put the rar file in the rom folder and tell the emulator to audit for games. it should find it and make it available.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 29, 2012, 07:44:19 PM
No, that's not my video.  I already downloaded everything a couple days ago and it runs at full speed.

Awesome game!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jul 30, 2012, 08:05:18 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jul 29, 2012, 07:44:19 PM
No, that's not my video.  I already downloaded everything a couple days ago and it runs at full speed.

Awesome game!

Why would that be his computer more or less emulator. That background is from the old old XP's
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Aug 01, 2012, 09:06:45 PM
I know it's a double-post but I have something of interest to all of you:

http://gawker.com/5930949/australian-businessman-determined-to-construct-real+life-jurassic-park (http://gawker.com/5930949/australian-businessman-determined-to-construct-real+life-jurassic-park)

:laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightlord on Aug 01, 2012, 09:17:57 PM
Quote from: Gate on Aug 01, 2012, 09:06:45 PM
I know it's a double-post but I have something of interest to all of you:

http://gawker.com/5930949/australian-businessman-determined-to-construct-real+life-jurassic-park (http://gawker.com/5930949/australian-businessman-determined-to-construct-real+life-jurassic-park)

:laugh:
Yes, eccentric billionaires are the best billionaires.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Aug 01, 2012, 09:31:03 PM
Quote from: Gate on Aug 01, 2012, 09:06:45 PM
I know it's a double-post but I have something of interest to all of you:

http://gawker.com/5930949/australian-businessman-determined-to-construct-real+life-jurassic-park (http://gawker.com/5930949/australian-businessman-determined-to-construct-real+life-jurassic-park)

:laugh:

I hope this takes off. If for no other reason than so I can quote Ian Malcolm while wearing this set. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on Aug 01, 2012, 09:32:41 PM
If this is going to happen I'm definitly going there wearing an Alan Grant outfit ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Aug 01, 2012, 09:32:49 PM
Quote from: Nightlord on Aug 01, 2012, 09:17:57 PM
Quote from: Gate on Aug 01, 2012, 09:06:45 PM
I know it's a double-post but I have something of interest to all of you:

http://gawker.com/5930949/australian-businessman-determined-to-construct-real+life-jurassic-park (http://gawker.com/5930949/australian-businessman-determined-to-construct-real+life-jurassic-park)

:laugh:
Yes, eccentric billionaires are the best billionaires.
Yup. That's what movie characters are made of.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Aug 01, 2012, 09:35:26 PM
Quote from: Gate on Aug 01, 2012, 09:06:45 PM
I know it's a double-post but I have something of interest to all of you:

http://gawker.com/5930949/australian-businessman-determined-to-construct-real+life-jurassic-park (http://gawker.com/5930949/australian-businessman-determined-to-construct-real+life-jurassic-park)

:laugh:

Sweet Jesus, that's delicious.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Feral_PRED on Aug 02, 2012, 12:27:23 AM
Quote from: Gate on Aug 01, 2012, 09:06:45 PM
I know it's a double-post but I have something of interest to all of you:

http://gawker.com/5930949/australian-businessman-determined-to-construct-real+life-jurassic-park (http://gawker.com/5930949/australian-businessman-determined-to-construct-real+life-jurassic-park)

:laugh:
Hold onto your butts.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Aug 02, 2012, 12:33:51 AM
Quote from: Gate on Aug 01, 2012, 09:06:45 PM
I know it's a double-post but I have something of interest to all of you:

http://gawker.com/5930949/australian-businessman-determined-to-construct-real+life-jurassic-park (http://gawker.com/5930949/australian-businessman-determined-to-construct-real+life-jurassic-park)

:laugh:

First comes the oooooing and aaaaahing, then comes the running and the screaming. Seriously, has this guy seen the movie or read the book?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Aug 02, 2012, 12:42:51 AM
Hold on people, he's Australian. He's several times more lethal than any dinosaur already.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Feral_PRED on Aug 02, 2012, 12:46:24 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Aug 02, 2012, 12:33:51 AM
Quote from: Gate on Aug 01, 2012, 09:06:45 PM
I know it's a double-post but I have something of interest to all of you:

http://gawker.com/5930949/australian-businessman-determined-to-construct-real+life-jurassic-park (http://gawker.com/5930949/australian-businessman-determined-to-construct-real+life-jurassic-park)

:laugh:

First comes the oooooing and aaaaahing, then comes the running and the screaming. Seriously, has this guy seen the movie or read the book?
I don't think he did. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Aug 02, 2012, 12:55:07 AM
It should be noted that Clive Palmer is a nutjob.

A well documented (http://www.smh.com.au/travel/travel-news/clive-palmer-plans-to-build-titanic-ii-luxury-cruise-ship-20120430-1xts2.html) nutjob.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Aug 02, 2012, 01:02:10 AM
His dreams are as big as he is.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.brisbanetimes.com.au%2F2012%2F02%2F19%2F3055353%2Fipad-art-wide-clive-palmer-420x0.jpg&hash=a28c9125dd128f84fbd16dc287937df20001bb5a)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Aug 02, 2012, 01:22:08 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.screened.com%2Fuploads%2F0%2F5125%2F405296-orn_free_taa_large.jpg&hash=30a80bd614fa595d71b0e95aeaca8eadaf4416ff)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Aug 02, 2012, 02:52:47 AM
Quote from: Gate on Aug 01, 2012, 09:06:45 PM
I know it's a double-post but I have something of interest to all of you:

http://gawker.com/5930949/australian-businessman-determined-to-construct-real+life-jurassic-park (http://gawker.com/5930949/australian-businessman-determined-to-construct-real+life-jurassic-park)

:laugh:

Consider this gentlemen...freakin' dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Aug 02, 2012, 02:54:54 AM
Weren't they planning on making the raptors able to use guns at some point?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Aug 02, 2012, 03:00:31 AM
Years and years ago. It was some BS about a guy training a squad Human-dino hybrids to use guns. I believe Frank Marshall has already said that this new movie will be nothing like that, thank god.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Aug 02, 2012, 07:35:47 AM
Quote from: Gate on Aug 01, 2012, 09:06:45 PM
I know it's a double-post but I have something of interest to all of you:

http://gawker.com/5930949/australian-businessman-determined-to-construct-real+life-jurassic-park (http://gawker.com/5930949/australian-businessman-determined-to-construct-real+life-jurassic-park)

:laugh:
As much as that sounds like a disaster waiting to happen.. If he does manage to do it, I'd probably still try to go see it.



I mean, it's freaking dinosaurs.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 02, 2012, 08:07:31 PM
You would be seeing...

"Genetically-engineered theme park attractions".

Not quite dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Aug 02, 2012, 08:32:43 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Aug 02, 2012, 08:07:31 PM
You would be seeing...

"Genetically-engineered theme park attractions".

Not quite dinosaurs.

As long as they look like Dinosaurs and act like dinosaurs, I really couldn't care less.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Aug 02, 2012, 10:15:51 PM
Quote from: SM on Aug 02, 2012, 01:22:08 AM
http://media.screened.com/uploads/0/5125/405296-orn_free_taa_large.jpg

lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Aug 02, 2012, 11:07:04 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Aug 02, 2012, 08:07:31 PM
You would be seeing...

"Genetically-engineered theme park attractions".

Not quite dinosaurs.
What Clive Palmer and his team did, is create genetically engineered theme park monsters -- Nothing more, and nothing less.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Aug 03, 2012, 03:18:04 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6_i5bt4wGQ#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6_i5bt4wGQ#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Aug 03, 2012, 03:23:19 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Aug 03, 2012, 03:18:04 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6_i5bt4wGQ#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6_i5bt4wGQ#ws)

Lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Aug 04, 2012, 05:33:15 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg861.imageshack.us%2Fimg861%2F5166%2Fgabbylostworldgold.png&hash=d6fa3d6dfefbad184e4f1a9c5e30513a506a51b2)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Aug 05, 2012, 04:31:23 AM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Aug 04, 2012, 05:33:15 PM
http://img861.imageshack.us/img861/5166/gabbylostworldgold.png

Hold on.  Is that really her!?

And did she just win that at the olympics?

EDIT*

Scrichity-scratch that...

Just me being dumb again.  ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Aug 05, 2012, 04:56:24 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Aug 04, 2012, 05:33:15 PM
http://img861.imageshack.us/img861/5166/gabbylostworldgold.png


Actually laughing right now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Jegeren on Aug 05, 2012, 09:54:04 PM
I am not really looking forward to it as I didn't like the last two movies, but I will probably see it when it does come out. I just hope the Spinosaurus doesn't usurp the T-rex again. It didn't bother me as much as other fans, but the T-rex was pretty much the icon of the movie at that time, and they just changed it in the blink of an eye. Gotta love Jack Horner.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Aug 06, 2012, 03:25:55 AM
Quote from: Jegeren on Aug 05, 2012, 09:54:04 PM
I am not really looking forward to it as I didn't like the last two movies, but I will probably see it when it does come out. I just hope the Spinosaurus doesn't usurp the T-rex again. It didn't bother me as much as other fans, but the T-rex was pretty much the icon of the movie at that time, and they just changed it in the blink of an eye. Gotta love Jack Horner.

Wanted to find him and kill him for the longest time. They'd BETTER bring T.Rex back. Anywho, has anyone played the Jurassic Park: Builder game for the iPhone other than me? It's pretty cool.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vecrotus on Aug 06, 2012, 01:46:56 PM
I agree, they'd better bring back the Tyrannosaurus Rex. I still want to see the Spinosaurus again though. Aside from it besting the T-Rex, it was a pretty cool dinosaur.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 06, 2012, 01:59:12 PM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Aug 06, 2012, 03:25:55 AM
Quote from: Jegeren on Aug 05, 2012, 09:54:04 PM
I am not really looking forward to it as I didn't like the last two movies, but I will probably see it when it does come out. I just hope the Spinosaurus doesn't usurp the T-rex again. It didn't bother me as much as other fans, but the T-rex was pretty much the icon of the movie at that time, and they just changed it in the blink of an eye. Gotta love Jack Horner.

Wanted to find him and kill him for the longest time. They'd BETTER bring T.Rex back. Anywho, has anyone played the Jurassic Park: Builder game for the iPhone other than me? It's pretty cool.

I'm addicted. It's the only SimCity-style game I enjoy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Aug 08, 2012, 05:16:52 PM
Never before seen image...

(https://fbcdn-photos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/s480x480/315311_449193315115577_671950428_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Aug 08, 2012, 05:47:56 PM
Someone else put a 'like' on the FB JP Origins page, uh? ;) :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RazorSlash on Aug 08, 2012, 06:19:01 PM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Aug 06, 2012, 03:25:55 AM
Quote from: Jegeren on Aug 05, 2012, 09:54:04 PM
I am not really looking forward to it as I didn't like the last two movies, but I will probably see it when it does come out. I just hope the Spinosaurus doesn't usurp the T-rex again. It didn't bother me as much as other fans, but the T-rex was pretty much the icon of the movie at that time, and they just changed it in the blink of an eye. Gotta love Jack Horner.

Wanted to find him and kill him for the longest time. They'd BETTER bring T.Rex back. Anywho, has anyone played the Jurassic Park: Builder game for the iPhone other than me? It's pretty cool.
I enjoy it, too. Except those Code Red Storms can be a pain in the ass at times.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Aug 08, 2012, 06:46:06 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Aug 08, 2012, 05:47:56 PM
Someone else put a 'like' on the FB JP Origins page, uh? ;) :)

yyyyyeeeaaaaaaaah  ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vecrotus on Aug 08, 2012, 07:10:16 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Aug 08, 2012, 05:16:52 PM
Never before seen image...

https://fbcdn-photos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/s480x480/315311_449193315115577_671950428_n.jpg

I've never seen that image before. The animatronics, even to this day, look amazing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on Aug 08, 2012, 07:37:18 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Aug 08, 2012, 06:46:06 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Aug 08, 2012, 05:47:56 PM
Someone else put a 'like' on the FB JP Origins page, uh? ;) :)

yyyyyeeeaaaaaaaah  ::)

Dude i have to say it. I LOVE YOUR SIG ! ;D I watched Jurassic Park so many times when i was little, every year i got a new VHS tape because the old one was worn out
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Aug 08, 2012, 08:11:36 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on Aug 08, 2012, 07:37:18 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Aug 08, 2012, 06:46:06 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Aug 08, 2012, 05:47:56 PM
Someone else put a 'like' on the FB JP Origins page, uh? ;) :)

yyyyyeeeaaaaaaaah  ::)

Dude i have to say it. I LOVE YOUR SIG ! ;D I watched Jurassic Park so many times when i was little, every year i got a new VHS tape because the old one was worn out

Thanks  :)

Yeah, surprisingly, my Jurassic Park VHS still plays. 

The condition of the case, on the other hand......
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Aug 08, 2012, 11:28:09 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Aug 08, 2012, 06:46:06 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Aug 08, 2012, 05:47:56 PM
Someone else put a 'like' on the FB JP Origins page, uh? ;) :)

yyyyyeeeaaaaaaaah  ::)
Don't you ::) at me!! :P

Lovely set by the way.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Aug 09, 2012, 03:45:19 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Aug 08, 2012, 11:28:09 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Aug 08, 2012, 06:46:06 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Aug 08, 2012, 05:47:56 PM
Someone else put a 'like' on the FB JP Origins page, uh? ;) :)

yyyyyeeeaaaaaaaah  ::)
Don't you ::) at me!! :P

Lovely set by the way.

:laugh:

Thank you mate!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on Aug 19, 2012, 11:18:08 PM
4th movie may be set in space. First time i read this i wasn't quite happy about it even though there is a big chance it won't happen. On a second thought (that is ofcourse if they can pull this off) it would be an interesting way of rebooting the franchise. Making it different from the earlier movies. I mean how many times can you get a group of people get stranded on an island. A planet could be really interesting (think of the newest turok game)

http://sknr.net/2012/08/15/jurassic-park-4-to-set-the-dinosaurs-in-space/ (http://sknr.net/2012/08/15/jurassic-park-4-to-set-the-dinosaurs-in-space/)

Quote
http://sknr.net/wp-content/themes/gazette-dark/430x270xthumb.php,qsrc=,hsknr.net,_wp-content,_uploads,_2012,_08,_2.png,ah=270,aw=430,azc=1.pagespeed.ic.WQyTB6rfYi.png

Jurassic Park 4 To Set the Dinosaurs in Space?

UPDATES I have contacted my reps at Universal both in Hollywood and with local publicity for Universal, but have not had any confirmation or denials. One person who read the news reported that they called Amblin who hung up on then and Universal who gave a "no comment" to the question about the rumor.

I know a very early idea had the military using the dinosaurs as a weapons program. Well today we have news that the concept being kicked around would set the film in the near future where Ingen is planting dinos on a forest/jungle planet. A ship full of scientists and crew crashes on the planet forcing them to survive the creatures.

The script is being written by the duo who made "Rise of the Planet of the Apes" so lets hope they can pull this off. I am skeptical as I first heard about a fourth film almost 10 years ago and it was off and on for ages. It was only when Spielberg himself said that it would be out in the next couple of years that I gave it any traction as the studio has confirmed a 2014 release date.

You can be it will be in 3D as well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Chris P on Aug 19, 2012, 11:49:18 PM
Honestly I can't believe this theory is getting that popular..  :D It's not an official plot idea. It originated here as fan speculation: http://www.jurassicpark4movie.net/community/forums/topic/25 (http://www.jurassicpark4movie.net/community/forums/topic/25)

Personally, I would not want to see JP4 in space. No need really. Plus the new writers, with their background are good at working classic titles into a modern world. I expect JP4 will take place more inland. There's some great discussions on JP4Movie.net about the involvement of InGen and BioSyn possibly creating Dino's for military use. Some good reads for fans of the franchise.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Aug 19, 2012, 11:49:54 PM
This sounds like it might be a movie version of Dino Crisis 3  :-\.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Aug 19, 2012, 11:53:10 PM
Sounds like a fan made theory blown out of proportion.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Aug 20, 2012, 01:00:43 AM
Quote from: Chris P on Aug 19, 2012, 11:49:18 PM
Honestly I can't believe this theory is getting that popular..  :D It's not an official plot idea. It originated here as fan speculation: http://www.jurassicpark4movie.net/community/forums/topic/25 (http://www.jurassicpark4movie.net/community/forums/topic/25)

Personally, I would not want to see JP4 in space. No need really. Plus the new writers, with their background are good at working classic titles into a modern world. I expect JP4 will take place more inland. There's some great discussions on JP4Movie.net about the involvement of InGen and BioSyn possibly creating Dino's for military use. Some good reads for fans of the franchise.
Jurassic Park 4.
In Space.
IN SPACE.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fohguild.org%2Fforums%2Fattachments%2Fmillies-movie-house%2F180407d1314115307-hellraiser-wtf_picard-468x.jpg&hash=59e5477409d6f2cc940df70711aac97aed4b131d)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Aug 20, 2012, 01:52:09 AM
Was the Jurassic Park 4 script with the 5 Deinonychus mercenaries ever leaked?

Cause i actually would like to have a look at "that" and my google research hasnt found anything... :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Aug 20, 2012, 03:01:12 AM
Quote from: Gate on Aug 20, 2012, 01:00:43 AM
Quote from: Chris P on Aug 19, 2012, 11:49:18 PM
Honestly I can't believe this theory is getting that popular..  :D It's not an official plot idea. It originated here as fan speculation: http://www.jurassicpark4movie.net/community/forums/topic/25 (http://www.jurassicpark4movie.net/community/forums/topic/25)

Personally, I would not want to see JP4 in space. No need really. Plus the new writers, with their background are good at working classic titles into a modern world. I expect JP4 will take place more inland. There's some great discussions on JP4Movie.net about the involvement of InGen and BioSyn possibly creating Dino's for military use. Some good reads for fans of the franchise.
Jurassic Park 4.
In Space.
IN SPACE.
http://www.fohguild.org/forums/attachments/millies-movie-house/180407d1314115307-hellraiser-wtf_picard-468x.jpg

This.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Aug 20, 2012, 04:51:53 AM
If they had seriously tried to take Jurassic Park into space, I might have actually turned my back on the franchise.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Aug 20, 2012, 04:53:42 AM
Space may even be worse that the dinosaurs with mounted guns idea...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Aug 20, 2012, 04:59:30 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Aug 20, 2012, 04:53:42 AM
Space may even be worse that the dinosaurs with mounted guns idea...

I hate that idea too.

It's pretty much a punch in the face to the original book and movie, and a slap in the face to the fans who loved them so much. It ceases to be "Jurassic Park" and is more "LoldinosaursviolentandshitLET'SGETSOMEGUNSALLUPINHERE"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Aug 20, 2012, 05:11:14 AM
Space screams Jason X all over again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Aug 20, 2012, 07:22:56 AM
It's a fan idea. There are thousands of fan ideas.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Aug 20, 2012, 07:38:17 AM
Dinosaurs in space ...

It's the worst idea in the history of bad ideas.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hc35_GgZvKo# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hc35_GgZvKo#)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjhJSD8RU4k# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjhJSD8RU4k#)

History tells us this line of thinking is flawed beyond reprieve.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 20, 2012, 01:47:29 PM
It couldn't be worse than this pile of crap:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fen%2Fthumb%2F8%2F82%2FDinocrisis3box.jpg%2F250px-Dinocrisis3box.jpg&hash=ef94e7c8f13b5a758aecefce0b0fede9d5d3ce6e)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: AvatarIII on Aug 20, 2012, 01:56:56 PM
shame that game sucks because it's a bad ass cover.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 20, 2012, 02:16:30 PM
Don't judge a game by it's cover ;)

Hopefully between the success of Primal Carnage and JP IV, a fourth DC will be made.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Aug 26, 2012, 03:28:04 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-prn1%2F557314_10151035431707817_105827504_n.jpg&hash=66299f6be6abc978b9c7f58262f91a718330da06)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Aug 26, 2012, 03:29:45 AM
Reminds me of the great reference to that scene in Toy Story 2, when Rex is chasing the Barbie car and appears in the mirror.

"Objects in mirror are closer than they appear" :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Aug 26, 2012, 03:34:36 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Aug 26, 2012, 03:28:04 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-prn1%2F557314_10151035431707817_105827504_n.jpg&hash=66299f6be6abc978b9c7f58262f91a718330da06)

My late night funnies quota has been filled.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Aug 26, 2012, 01:05:22 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Aug 26, 2012, 03:29:45 AM
Reminds me of the great reference to that scene in Toy Story 2, when Rex is chasing the Barbie car and appears in the mirror.

"Objects in mirror are closer than they appear" :D

Loved that part too  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 26, 2012, 02:30:47 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Aug 26, 2012, 03:28:04 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-prn1%2F557314_10151035431707817_105827504_n.jpg&hash=66299f6be6abc978b9c7f58262f91a718330da06)

I just noticed he has three fingers on his hand. Some T.Rex he is.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Aug 26, 2012, 02:32:12 PM
Wow, I never noticed that before. Toy Story has been in my life pretty much as far back as I can remember, yet I really never noticed that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Aug 26, 2012, 06:48:53 PM
Lol.  Me neither. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shinawi on Aug 27, 2012, 02:26:52 AM
Quote from: fluxcap on Apr 01, 2007, 01:40:21 AM
I suppose more T-Rex action, but I can't see where they can go with a part 4. I've always thought a prequel would be decent, to see how InGen created the dino's in the lab. It could be more of a technological suspense movie that at the end has some fully grown dino's breaking loose from the labs and InGen would have to dispatch its hired guns to clean up the mess.
I like the prequel idea. Bob Peck (the game warden) and Samuel L Jackson (the park's chief engineer) were awesome in the original. And I want to see more of the other characters who made brief appearances in that movie. If Wayne Knight appears then I want him to be more comical. I'm just afraid that they might look older now.

From what I could gather here, it seems that the next sequel will take place outside the islands. A lot of people I know laughed at the Tyrannosaurus rex appearing in the US suburb. The movie lost its sense of realism way too much. The tropical island helped make it seem like a different time and different world when it really wasn't. Having the T. rex moving around the suburban houses and the cars took away that feeling. I have no problem with it if it was depicted well. Give it a Jaws or Aliens kind of story/feeling and I think it would work. And have the kids who appeared in the original appear in the next sequel (as adults).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Aug 27, 2012, 02:30:25 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Aug 26, 2012, 03:28:04 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-prn1%2F557314_10151035431707817_105827504_n.jpg&hash=66299f6be6abc978b9c7f58262f91a718330da06)

Turn into the spin, Barbie!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 27, 2012, 05:44:38 PM
http://www.scribd.com/doc/74767800/Jurassic-Park-IV (http://www.scribd.com/doc/74767800/Jurassic-Park-IV)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Feral_PRED on Aug 27, 2012, 06:14:04 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Aug 27, 2012, 05:44:38 PM
http://www.scribd.com/doc/74767800/Jurassic-Park-IV (http://www.scribd.com/doc/74767800/Jurassic-Park-IV)
Is it fan-made?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Aug 27, 2012, 06:16:00 PM
I wonder when they will release the 3D trailer? I guess during the Super Bowl could work.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Aug 27, 2012, 06:20:07 PM
Quote from: Alienhunter15 on Aug 27, 2012, 06:14:04 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Aug 27, 2012, 05:44:38 PM
http://www.scribd.com/doc/74767800/Jurassic-Park-IV (http://www.scribd.com/doc/74767800/Jurassic-Park-IV)
Is it fan-made?

Yes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 28, 2012, 12:10:16 AM
Quote from: Shinawi on Aug 27, 2012, 02:26:52 AM
Quote from: fluxcap on Apr 01, 2007, 01:40:21 AM
I suppose more T-Rex action, but I can't see where they can go with a part 4. I've always thought a prequel would be decent, to see how InGen created the dino's in the lab. It could be more of a technological suspense movie that at the end has some fully grown dino's breaking loose from the labs and InGen would have to dispatch its hired guns to clean up the mess.
I like the prequel idea. Bob Peck (the game warden) and Samuel L Jackson (the park's chief engineer) were awesome in the original. And I want to see more of the other characters who made brief appearances in that movie. If Wayne Knight appears then I want him to be more comical. I'm just afraid that they might look older now.

From what I could gather here, it seems that the next sequel will take place outside the islands. A lot of people I know laughed at the Tyrannosaurus rex appearing in the US suburb. The movie lost its sense of realism way too much. The tropical island helped make it seem like a different time and different world when it really wasn't. Having the T. rex moving around the suburban houses and the cars took away that feeling. I have no problem with it if it was depicted well. Give it a Jaws or Aliens kind of story/feeling and I think it would work. And have the kids who appeared in the original appear in the next sequel (as adults).

Wayne Knight's character is dead, unless the Dilophosaurus had indigestion halfway while chomping on him and he survived with one arm.

The movies were never about realism, to me at least. The whole concept surrounding JP is fantastical and so despite being built on theoretical science, it's not real.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Shinawi on Aug 28, 2012, 01:27:49 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Aug 28, 2012, 12:10:16 AM
Quote from: Shinawi on Aug 27, 2012, 02:26:52 AM
Quote from: fluxcap on Apr 01, 2007, 01:40:21 AM
I suppose more T-Rex action, but I can't see where they can go with a part 4. I've always thought a prequel would be decent, to see how InGen created the dino's in the lab. It could be more of a technological suspense movie that at the end has some fully grown dino's breaking loose from the labs and InGen would have to dispatch its hired guns to clean up the mess.
I like the prequel idea. Bob Peck (the game warden) and Samuel L Jackson (the park's chief engineer) were awesome in the original. And I want to see more of the other characters who made brief appearances in that movie. If Wayne Knight appears then I want him to be more comical. I'm just afraid that they might look older now.

From what I could gather here, it seems that the next sequel will take place outside the islands. A lot of people I know laughed at the Tyrannosaurus rex appearing in the US suburb. The movie lost its sense of realism way too much. The tropical island helped make it seem like a different time and different world when it really wasn't. Having the T. rex moving around the suburban houses and the cars took away that feeling. I have no problem with it if it was depicted well. Give it a Jaws or Aliens kind of story/feeling and I think it would work. And have the kids who appeared in the original appear in the next sequel (as adults).

Wayne Knight's character is dead, unless the Dilophosaurus had indigestion halfway while chomping on him and he survived with one arm.
I was talking about a JP prequel for Wayne Knight.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Aug 28, 2012, 12:10:16 AM
The movies were never about realism, to me at least. The whole concept surrounding JP is fantastical and so despite being built on theoretical science, it's not real.
I know.
It would be more thrilling and fun if it gave more of a realistic feeling. This is the opinion of a lot of people I know of.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Aug 28, 2012, 02:28:27 AM
QuoteThe movies were never about realism, to me at least. The whole concept surrounding JP is fantastical and so despite being built on theoretical science, it's not real.

Which they took great pains to make appear legitimate.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Aug 28, 2012, 03:42:57 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Aug 27, 2012, 05:44:38 PM
http://www.scribd.com/doc/74767800/Jurassic-Park-IV (http://www.scribd.com/doc/74767800/Jurassic-Park-IV)

One of the better fan scripts I've read in a while.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Aug 29, 2012, 03:35:10 AM
The 3D re-release got bump up to April.

http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/08/16/jurassic-park-3d-gets-bumped-up-to-spring (http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/08/16/jurassic-park-3d-gets-bumped-up-to-spring)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 29, 2012, 02:41:32 PM
Sweet deal ;D

I've been doing some eBay hunting for JP toys as of late. I'm surprised at how common some of the stuff is. The Carnotaurus in particular is pretty common, from Series II. It's only the Quetzocoatlus that's truly rare; I saw a packaged one going for $400 USD. The electronic Velociraptor and Dilophosaurus from Series I are pretty common as well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Aug 30, 2012, 02:45:20 AM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Aug 29, 2012, 03:35:10 AM
The 3D re-release got bump up to April.

http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/08/16/jurassic-park-3d-gets-bumped-up-to-spring (http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/08/16/jurassic-park-3d-gets-bumped-up-to-spring)

Oh f**k yes!  Birthday month!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Aug 31, 2012, 10:20:04 PM
I always felt that Jurassic Park The Game by Telltale Games was a worthy entry into the series; honestly, it would have made a better movie than it did a game.  The story did have some cliches and the first part had too many homages to the first film, but I think the title was able to get away with it cause it was part of a classic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Sep 01, 2012, 01:15:51 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Aug 30, 2012, 02:45:20 AM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Aug 29, 2012, 03:35:10 AM
The 3D re-release got bump up to April.

http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/08/16/jurassic-park-3d-gets-bumped-up-to-spring (http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/08/16/jurassic-park-3d-gets-bumped-up-to-spring)

Oh f**k yes!  Birthday month!!!

I VERY MUCH AGREEEE
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Sep 01, 2012, 02:45:16 AM
They better give us a trailer soon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 01, 2012, 04:39:35 PM
Quote from: predxeno on Aug 31, 2012, 10:20:04 PM
I always felt that Jurassic Park The Game by Telltale Games was a worthy entry into the series; honestly, it would have made a better movie than it did a game.  The story did have some cliches and the first part had too many homages to the first film, but I think the title was able to get away with it cause it was part of a classic.

It would have made a great film. I still think it's the best JP sequel ever.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Sep 02, 2012, 03:04:09 PM
I am really hoping Telltale will make a sequel. It might be their best game yet. (aside from The walking dead)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nope on Sep 02, 2012, 10:11:56 PM
Really? I couldnt stand the game. Mind you I stopped playing after getting the shaving cream container, but unless the quality of the game suddenly jumps about 10 fold after that, I was not impressed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 13, 2012, 02:57:32 AM
This lovely item is now mine. I bought it today (http://www.ebay.com/itm/370640195719?ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1439.l2649#ht_888wt_1163). ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Sep 13, 2012, 03:59:24 AM
Hmmmm maybe I should put my old Jurassic Park toys up on ebay.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 13, 2012, 04:23:10 AM
What do you have to sell?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Sep 13, 2012, 05:12:26 AM
I had a lot of toys from the first two movies. The raptors, utahaptor, carnotaurus, dilo, tric, Juvenile and adult t-rex, most of the characters from JP1 and some vehicles. From TLW, I have most characters including their baby dinos, both T-rexes, the spino, stego, raptors, pteranodon, etc. Some JP3 toys, but those weren't that great so I didn't get many.

They're all in a box at my parents house, so I would have to go and see what is still there. I played with them like crazy when I was a kid, so some of them have normal wear and tear.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 13, 2012, 05:42:39 AM
Asking price, mayhaps, on the Carno and Utahs? And their condition?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Sep 13, 2012, 01:55:58 PM
Honestly, they're pretty worn. At least, the Carno is. I'll be stopping by my parents place this weekend, so I'll take some pics of all my stuff and put them up so you can get a better idea of they're condition. We can talk price from there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: AvatarIII on Sep 13, 2012, 02:03:28 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Sep 01, 2012, 02:45:16 AM
They better give us a trailer soon.

what movie would it go in front of? if it's not at theatres in front of a 3D movie you might as well watch any old JP trailer. and what 3D non-kids movies are coming out between now and spring?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 13, 2012, 05:43:28 PM
After the success of my first JP collection video I figured I needed to make a sequel.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RoUcB_Opbk#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RoUcB_Opbk#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 13, 2012, 07:45:14 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Sep 13, 2012, 01:55:58 PM
Honestly, they're pretty worn. At least, the Carno is. I'll be stopping by my parents place this weekend, so I'll take some pics of all my stuff and put them up so you can get a better idea of they're condition. We can talk price from there.

Cheers, I look forward to it!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Sep 13, 2012, 07:54:48 PM
James Cameron almost directed Jurassic Park.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=67172 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=67172)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Sep 13, 2012, 08:35:25 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi847.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fab35%2FSpace-Sweeper%2FVarious%2520GIFs%2Ftumblr_m45g16FP0o1qaj09co4_250.gif&hash=bff28a608cd4511c5d11aa50e5a6a8054335ab4d)

This, uh... kind of really blows my mind.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Sep 13, 2012, 08:37:29 PM
Damn... *smacks chair*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Sep 13, 2012, 08:37:34 PM
That would have been a great choice actually.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Sep 13, 2012, 08:42:10 PM
One can only imagine a Jurassic Park with Cameron's muscular storytelling skills, and none of the unfortunate Spielbergian Stupid™ that mars the film in places. At the very least, there'd be no "It's the UNIX system--I know this!!!1!" silliness.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on Sep 13, 2012, 08:44:55 PM
I wouldn't trade Spielberg's Jurassic Park for the world. But i would love to see Cameron's take on it. A darker story could be interesting.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightlord on Sep 13, 2012, 09:48:24 PM
Quote"But when I saw the film, I realised that I was not the right person to make the film, he [Spielberg] was. Because he made a dinosaur movie for kids, and mine would have been Aliens with dinosaurs, and that wouldn't have been fair.

"Dinosaurs are for 8-year-olds. We can all enjoy it, too, but kids get dinosaurs and they should not have been excluded for that. His sensibility was right for that film. I'd have gone further, nastier, much nastier."

Read more at http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=67172#a6GV4mVqryhfI4XB.99 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=67172#a6GV4mVqryhfI4XB.99)
Yeah, nah, I'm glad Spielberg got the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Sep 13, 2012, 10:17:05 PM
I'm glad we got what we did, personally.

But I bet Cameron's would have been darker in tone like the book, which also would have been cool.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Sep 14, 2012, 03:27:26 AM
Pretty glad Cameron didn't take the reigns :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Sep 14, 2012, 03:34:53 AM
I'm happy with the film that we got.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Sep 14, 2012, 03:50:37 AM
I'm more than happy with the film we got.

Then again if Cameron made it we wouldn't retroactively now what Spielberg's is like, and would probably like Cameron's at least.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nope on Sep 14, 2012, 04:04:38 AM
I dont know if Cameron wouldve captured the wonder and awe side of Jurassic Park that Spielberg did so well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: stephen on Sep 14, 2012, 04:36:29 AM
It's kinda cool to hear Cameron say (in hindsight) that Spielburg was the right guy in the end anyway.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 14, 2012, 04:56:20 AM
Quote from: Nightlord on Sep 13, 2012, 09:48:24 PM
Quote"But when I saw the film, I realised that I was not the right person to make the film, he [Spielberg] was. Because he made a dinosaur movie for kids, and mine would have been Aliens with dinosaurs, and that wouldn't have been fair.

"Dinosaurs are for 8-year-olds. We can all enjoy it, too, but kids get dinosaurs and they should not have been excluded for that. His sensibility was right for that film. I'd have gone further, nastier, much nastier."

Read more at http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=67172#a6GV4mVqryhfI4XB.99 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=67172#a6GV4mVqryhfI4XB.99)
Yeah, nah, I'm glad Spielberg got the movie.

Dinosaurs are for 8-year olds? f**k off.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Sep 14, 2012, 05:05:11 AM
Why?  Kids dig dinosaurs.  Be stupid to make it inaccessable to that audience.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 14, 2012, 05:11:47 AM
Eh, just the way I read it. It sounds like he's saying they only appeal to that age group.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Sep 14, 2012, 05:13:23 AM
I think Jurassic Park walks that fine line, because it's almost a family-friendly movie, but I know some kids that have had the shit scared out of them by it, too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Sep 14, 2012, 05:15:49 AM
Quite.  The Firstborn watched JP1 and 2 incessantly when she was younger.  Secondborn doesn't want a bar of it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 14, 2012, 05:21:04 AM
What, she too cool for reptiles? :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Sep 14, 2012, 05:23:05 AM
Shit scared of monsters with big gnashy teeth morelike, and prone to nightmares.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 14, 2012, 05:26:29 AM
Haha. We've all been there.

I remember seeing JP in theatres when I was six years old. When the raptor attacked Ellie in the shed, I ducked behind the theatre seats for cover :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Sep 14, 2012, 05:36:12 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 14, 2012, 05:26:29 AM
Haha. We've all been there.

I remember seeing JP in theatres when I was six years old. When the raptor attacked Ellie in the shed, I ducked behind the theatre seats for cover :D
LMFAO, I went to see it with a friend and his family, and during that exact part, my friend's dad had dropped something and was sitting back up in his seat.  When the raptor burst through he f**king screamed like a girl, loud as hell. :laugh:

Spielberg must've had fun with that one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 14, 2012, 05:56:40 AM
Spielberg admitted to hiding behind his camera man when the T.Rex animatronic started to move. The quote was in a magazine I have somewhere.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Sep 14, 2012, 07:10:49 AM
 :laugh:  Probably because he didn't want a hydraulic to give out on the f**ker and be crushed by it.

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdenverstapletonrotary.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F08%2Fdenver-blue-horse.jpg&hash=5ea552ad2f54bba5ea774122233d5ca7fa1da234)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Sep 14, 2012, 11:18:50 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 14, 2012, 05:56:40 AM
Spielberg admitted to hiding behind his camera man when the T.Rex animatronic started to move. The quote was in a magazine I have somewhere.
If you found and put it here verbatim I would be grateful. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Sep 14, 2012, 11:27:52 AM
Quote from: Snowdog on Sep 13, 2012, 08:44:55 PM
I wouldn't trade Spielberg's Jurassic Park for the world. But i would love to see Cameron's take on it. A darker story could be interesting.

This.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Sep 14, 2012, 11:42:56 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Sep 14, 2012, 11:27:52 AM
Quote from: Snowdog on Sep 13, 2012, 08:44:55 PM
I wouldn't trade Spielberg's Jurassic Park for the world. But i would love to see Cameron's take on it. A darker story could be interesting.

This.
Cameron should've done the movie in the spotlight of competing Corporations more.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Sep 14, 2012, 02:07:02 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 14, 2012, 05:56:40 AM
Spielberg admitted to hiding behind his camera man when the T.Rex animatronic started to move. The quote was in a magazine I have somewhere.

I'm not surprised, the animatronic is incredible. It's slightly unnerving just to watch the test footage.

Anyway, on the subject of Cameron, like everyone else I'm perfectly happy with the film we got. May have been an interesting scenario to have Cameron do the sequel, however - the themes about pillaging the natural world are similar to what he'd later explore with Avatar, and he's certainly a better candidate for the darker material that The Lost World yielded.

Would also have been interesting to see him try his hand at an adapted story, or even directing someone else's script.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 14, 2012, 06:23:00 PM
I was fine TLW we received. I'm too concerned Cameron would've ripped someone else's story off when making it, given that there themes of power and control within.

Quote from: OmegaZilla on Sep 14, 2012, 11:18:50 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 14, 2012, 05:56:40 AM
Spielberg admitted to hiding behind his camera man when the T.Rex animatronic started to move. The quote was in a magazine I have somewhere.
If you found and put it here verbatim I would be grateful. :)

Sure, I'll dig it up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Sep 14, 2012, 07:51:23 PM
Thanks man. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Sep 14, 2012, 10:04:20 PM
QuoteI was fine TLW we received. I'm too concerned Cameron would've ripped someone else's story off when making it, given that there themes of power and control within.

Because Spielberg didn't rip off King Kong or anything...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 14, 2012, 10:06:13 PM
When did he rip-off King Kong? If you're referring to the scene where the Rex walks past the basketball net, I've heard varying accounts of what's actually happening. Some say he is scratching his ear a la the Rex in King Kong, others say he's making a dribbling motion with his hands which seems more likely given the motion.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Sep 14, 2012, 10:10:45 PM
QuoteWhen did he rip-off King Kong?

Pretty much everything from when a ship called the Venture shows up.

I thought it was  deliberately obvious.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 14, 2012, 10:12:20 PM
Oh yeah, forgot about that. Ok, so the ship name. What else?

You can't claim that Rex running through the streets is a rip-off of Kong because TLW sure as heck isn't the second movie after KK to feature a giant monster running amok in an urban centre.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Sep 14, 2012, 10:13:15 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 14, 2012, 10:12:20 PM
Oh yeah, forgot about that. Ok, so the ship name. What else?

You can't claim that Rex running through the streets is a rip-off of Kong because TLW sure as heck isn't the second movie after KK to feature a giant monster running amok in an urban centre.

The Rex in the city was more an homage to the silent TLW than anything else.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Sep 14, 2012, 10:18:15 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 14, 2012, 10:12:20 PM
Oh yeah, forgot about that. Ok, so the ship name. What else?

You can't claim that Rex running through the streets is a rip-off of Kong because TLW sure as heck isn't the second movie after KK to feature a giant monster running amok in an urban centre.

The whole thing about a monster from a mysterious island being brought to a city for entertainment then running amok seemed like it was obviously based on King Kong.  Maybe rip off is too strong a word, but there you go.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 14, 2012, 10:19:12 PM
I'd say it's more of an homage, but even that would be a stretch. The only direct references to Kong are the Venture and the basketball net scene.

As for the city rampage, I was thinking Godzilla.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Sep 14, 2012, 10:21:34 PM
Naw, the T Rex running amok is more akin to the Silent Lost World, IMO. In that is was a Brontosaurus, but still...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 14, 2012, 10:22:54 PM
You're right. Where do you think the idea of a rampaging monster started?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Sep 14, 2012, 10:25:31 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 14, 2012, 10:22:54 PM
You're right. Where do you think the idea of a rampaging monster started?

All the way back to ancient mythology.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Sep 14, 2012, 11:02:53 PM
My guess would be even farther back, to like cavemen and shit.

A pissed off Mammoth would probably fit the idea of a "Rampaging Monster"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 15, 2012, 12:14:55 AM
In popular movies, excuse me :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 15, 2012, 01:06:59 PM
The T-rex loose in San Diego is a homage to both King Kong and Godzilla. The ship's name is a reference to King Kong and the shot where we see Japanese business men running along shouting "I left Japan for this" is a reference to Godzilla.

With the success of the first movie there was always going to be a sequel and Spielberg knew that people wanted to see one of the dinosaurs loose on the mainland. The Tyrannosaurus was the perfect choice. I personally love the ending and how it feels like King Kong or Godzilla but in the JP universe, its one of the best sequences in the entire trilogy.

8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Sep 15, 2012, 03:28:45 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 15, 2012, 01:06:59 PM
The T-rex loose in San Diego is a homage to both King Kong and Godzilla. The ship's name is a reference to King Kong and the shot where we see Japanese business men running along shouting "I left Japan for this" is a reference to Godzilla.

With the success of the first movie there was always going to be a sequel and Spielberg knew that people wanted to see one of the dinosaurs loose on the mainland. The Tyrannosaurus was the perfect choice. I personally love the ending and how it feels like King Kong or Godzilla but in the JP universe, it ones of the best sequences in the entire trilogy.

8)

Completely agree.  It's one of the reasons why I prefer The Lost World a little more than the original.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Sep 15, 2012, 04:33:42 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkrceiqRqto#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkrceiqRqto#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shinawi on Sep 15, 2012, 04:35:20 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 15, 2012, 01:06:59 PM
The T-rex loose in San Diego is a homage to both King Kong and Godzilla. The ship's name is a reference to King Kong and the shot where we see Japanese business men running along shouting "I left Japan for this" is a reference to Godzilla.

With the success of the first movie there was always going to be a sequel and Spielberg knew that people wanted to see one of the dinosaurs loose on the mainland. The Tyrannosaurus was the perfect choice. I personally love the ending and how it feels like King Kong or Godzilla but in the JP universe, it ones of the best sequences in the entire trilogy.

8)
I wanted to see that too. Not all agree though. My sister's friend thought it was ridiculous.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on Sep 15, 2012, 04:55:29 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Sep 15, 2012, 04:33:42 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkrceiqRqto#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkrceiqRqto#ws)

So much win, I truly love these movies!!! ;D All 3 despite the flaws the sequels have.

Quote from: Shinawi on Sep 15, 2012, 04:35:20 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 15, 2012, 01:06:59 PM
The T-rex loose in San Diego is a homage to both King Kong and Godzilla. The ship's name is a reference to King Kong and the shot where we see Japanese business men running along shouting "I left Japan for this" is a reference to Godzilla.

With the success of the first movie there was always going to be a sequel and Spielberg knew that people wanted to see one of the dinosaurs loose on the mainland. The Tyrannosaurus was the perfect choice. I personally love the ending and how it feels like King Kong or Godzilla but in the JP universe, it ones of the best sequences in the entire trilogy.

8)
I wanted to see that too. Not all agree though. My sister's friend thought it was ridiculous.

No offence but your sister's friend is ridiculous ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Sep 15, 2012, 05:35:21 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Sep 15, 2012, 04:33:42 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkrceiqRqto#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkrceiqRqto#ws)

That video really manages to make Lost World seem better than it actually was.  :laugh:


...Now I really want to see the first two in theaters, though..
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 15, 2012, 07:36:06 PM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Sep 15, 2012, 05:35:21 PM
That video really manages to make Lost World seem better than it actually was.  :laugh:

Nope, it was that good ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Sep 15, 2012, 07:49:10 PM
The Lost World: Jurassic Park rocks, gentlemen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 15, 2012, 07:51:20 PM
Yeah it does! Just LOOK at that C.G.I!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F24.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_m4yva4EwXM1qh3wnco2_500.gif&hash=d881ff4577c0119bff9bee25df9f198198792583)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Sep 15, 2012, 07:53:10 PM
That shot. So f**king beautiful.

And this one?
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages3.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20111209021812%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2F9%2F96%2FJPTLWRexRoarSanDiego.png&hash=40a8be1313b345d2ad71b9ff18a3089a19a0ede9)
Jaw-droppingly wondrous.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 15, 2012, 07:54:51 PM
I've always thought the C.G.I in the first two JP films felt really weighty like it was really there. Hard to describe.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Sep 15, 2012, 08:01:27 PM
Seamless blend between practical and digital effects.

And hell yeah, The Lost World on VHS was my childhood.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 15, 2012, 09:05:10 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 15, 2012, 01:06:59 PM
The T-rex loose in San Diego is a homage to both King Kong and Godzilla. The ship's name is a reference to King Kong and the shot where we see Japanese business men running along shouting "I left Japan for this" is a reference to Godzilla.

With the success of the first movie there was always going to be a sequel and Spielberg knew that people wanted to see one of the dinosaurs loose on the mainland. The Tyrannosaurus was the perfect choice. I personally love the ending and how it feels like King Kong or Godzilla but in the JP universe, it ones of the best sequences in the entire trilogy.

8)

Yup, caught that one. AND THANK YOU!!! Finally, some love for the Rex sequence. People really seem to shit on it at times for no real reason.

Quote from: MrSpaceJockey on Sep 15, 2012, 08:01:27 PM
Seamless blend between practical and digital effects.

And hell yeah, The Lost World on VHS was my childhood.

Lol, I remember after I rented it the first time, my mum said, "Heck with it, might as well buy it. You'll be renting it enough times" :D

Omega, here are the scans I promised.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi86.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk93%2FDoomRulz_316%2FCCI09152012_00000.jpg&hash=dbadae766feacc9ebc1a8433ba2ffe600825b65e)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi86.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk93%2FDoomRulz_316%2FCCI09152012_00001.jpg&hash=c1097088ecc6bedce617e688f0b01988b465a3bb)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Sep 15, 2012, 10:20:23 PM
Quote from: MrSpaceJockey on Sep 15, 2012, 08:01:27 PM
Seamless blend between practical and digital effects.

And hell yeah, The Lost World on VHS was my childhood.

dis nigga
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Sep 15, 2012, 10:35:13 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 15, 2012, 09:05:10 PM
Omega, here are the scans I promised.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi86.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk93%2FDoomRulz_316%2FCCI09152012_00000.jpg&hash=dbadae766feacc9ebc1a8433ba2ffe600825b65e)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi86.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk93%2FDoomRulz_316%2FCCI09152012_00001.jpg&hash=c1097088ecc6bedce617e688f0b01988b465a3bb)
Holy SHIT!

Thanks dude! :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 16, 2012, 06:04:22 AM
You're quite welcome. There's something...I dunno, adorable, about picturing Spielberg hiding behind the cameraman, lol.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Sep 16, 2012, 06:12:32 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Sep 15, 2012, 04:33:42 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkrceiqRqto#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkrceiqRqto#ws)

This is basically my life right here.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 25, 2012, 12:06:08 AM
Picked this baby up from the post office on Saturday 8)

http://instagram.com/p/P4w7LzlEh8/?intent=like (http://instagram.com/p/P4w7LzlEh8/?intent=like)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Sep 25, 2012, 12:08:47 AM
I had that. :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Sep 25, 2012, 12:09:19 AM
Won't somebody save the children from the "deadly" jaws???
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 25, 2012, 12:24:52 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Sep 25, 2012, 12:08:47 AM
I had that. :'(

You can find loose ones on eBay for a good price.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Sep 25, 2012, 12:52:00 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 25, 2012, 12:06:08 AM
Picked this baby up from the post office on Saturday 8)

http://instagram.com/p/P4w7LzlEh8/?intent=like (http://instagram.com/p/P4w7LzlEh8/?intent=like)

I still have that, those I think mine might be a slightly different color!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 25, 2012, 12:52:50 AM
Then you have either the JP Series II variant or the TLW exclusive version...most likely.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Sep 25, 2012, 12:59:14 AM
Is the lighting just different in this picture, or is this one of the variants? Because I'm pretty sure this is the one I have:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fecx.images-amazon.com%2Fimages%2FI%2F51ct1ngerjL._SL500_AA300_.jpg&hash=be15eafcb03842fa8290df7fb9fb8134d0911349)

This guy was always my favorite, though. Still have him, too.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.mylot.com%2FuserImages%2Fimages%2Fpostphotos%2F2147278.jpg&hash=896f5bd89d5164edfa95f3f8932bdb3c732deeac)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Sep 25, 2012, 01:08:06 AM
Marvel as THRASHING ACTION THRASHER T-REX (TM) violently devours it's own young!! (TM)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Sep 25, 2012, 01:38:50 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Sep 15, 2012, 04:33:42 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkrceiqRqto#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkrceiqRqto#ws)
Man... just watching that, I mourn the existence of Jurassic Park III.  :laugh:

When they capped it off with Malcolm looking at the gates closing over the t-rex and had Hammond's closing monologue playing, it set the mood perfectly for a definitive "The End"... but then I looked at the runtime.  :(

Remaining as one of my all-time favorite themes:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEbWXnkZVJg# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEbWXnkZVJg#)

Dat sweeping primal adventure...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Sep 25, 2012, 03:36:29 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 25, 2012, 12:06:08 AM
Picked this baby up from the post office on Saturday 8)

http://instagram.com/p/P4w7LzlEh8/?intent=like (http://instagram.com/p/P4w7LzlEh8/?intent=like)

MOTHERF*CKER!  What's the status on your collection?  How many Rexes?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 25, 2012, 04:31:36 AM
Only two; that one, and a loose Bull T.Rex from TLW line. Next one on my list is the red Rex from JP Series I.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 25, 2012, 08:11:59 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCBkGzqcjEM# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCBkGzqcjEM#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Sep 29, 2012, 12:26:11 PM
Small update on the status of JPIV: http://www.joblo.com/horror-movies/news/whats-the-status-of-jurassic-park-iv-find-out-here (http://www.joblo.com/horror-movies/news/whats-the-status-of-jurassic-park-iv-find-out-here)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Sep 29, 2012, 04:09:02 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Sep 29, 2012, 12:26:11 PM
Small update on the status of JPIV: http://www.joblo.com/horror-movies/news/whats-the-status-of-jurassic-park-iv-find-out-here (http://www.joblo.com/horror-movies/news/whats-the-status-of-jurassic-park-iv-find-out-here)

I want to see the series take a few new turns, then radically change. I think that we need to introduce new audiences, THEN have a big boom movie where shit hits the fan.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Sep 29, 2012, 04:11:16 PM
Quote from: Gate on Sep 29, 2012, 04:09:02 PM
then radically change.
I have an idea.
Spoiler
The dinosaurs are actually very advanced biological suits with alien squids inside.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Sep 29, 2012, 04:30:12 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Sep 29, 2012, 04:11:16 PM
Quote from: Gate on Sep 29, 2012, 04:09:02 PM
then radically change.
I have an idea.
Spoiler
The dinosaurs are actually very advanced biological suits with alien squids inside.
[close]

In all honesty, I always favored the idea of an extinction event on humans, in which dinosaurs have some kind of ancient disease nobody knew about. Or maybe something huge is wiping the human race out, and Isla Sorna, having the only source of cure for it (perhaps in the dinosaurs themselves) humans have to go in and try to procure samples.

Then of course there's the other one where they start washing up on the shores of South America.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Sep 29, 2012, 08:33:14 PM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/183439_436450276390645_1309450361_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Sep 29, 2012, 10:20:50 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Sep 29, 2012, 08:33:14 PM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/183439_436450276390645_1309450361_n.jpg)

OH MY f**kING LORD, THAT IS BEAUTIFUL!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Sep 29, 2012, 10:48:48 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Sep 29, 2012, 08:33:14 PM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/183439_436450276390645_1309450361_n.jpg)

It's things like this that make me realize just how big that Spino animatronic was; absolutely insane.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Sep 30, 2012, 03:02:50 AM
Producer Kathleen Kennedy Updates On JURASSIC PARK IV

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=67985 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=67985)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Sep 30, 2012, 05:19:32 PM
This sort of thing just can't be rushed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DJ Pu$$yface on Sep 30, 2012, 07:59:32 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Sep 29, 2012, 08:33:14 PM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/183439_436450276390645_1309450361_n.jpg)

I utterly despise that scene, but I have to admit, that is pretty cool.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 30, 2012, 10:08:02 PM
Quote from: Gate on Sep 29, 2012, 04:30:12 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Sep 29, 2012, 04:11:16 PM
Quote from: Gate on Sep 29, 2012, 04:09:02 PM
then radically change.
I have an idea.
Spoiler
The dinosaurs are actually very advanced biological suits with alien squids inside.
[close]

In all honesty, I always favored the idea of an extinction event on humans, in which dinosaurs have some kind of ancient disease nobody knew about. Or maybe something huge is wiping the human race out, and Isla Sorna, having the only source of cure for it (perhaps in the dinosaurs themselves) humans have to go in and try to procure samples.

Eh. That sounds like a dystopian future movie. Personally I'm tired of that genre. Maybe if the disease is serious that it could cause that, but isn't actually wiping people out yet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Sep 30, 2012, 11:58:33 PM
I'm probably alone in this, but I would like to see it brought back a bit and deal with fewer dinosaurs. I like the idea of Biosyn continuing research on specific dinosaur species in a remote high tech facility. Make it more of a techno-thriller with dinosaurs.

Kinda like what Wu wanted to do with the dinos in the original novel, by experimenting with their DNA to make them more docile and what people expected Dinosaurs to behave like. But instead, it's Biosyn experimenting with diinosaurs for disease research. The human drama needs to be less "holycrapdinosrun!", and more focused on the moral gray area of DNA experimentation. I imagined there would be a Dodgson type figure that didn't trust those who he worked with, and could lead to some interesting scenes of tension where the audience didn't know who to side with or trust.

When it comes to the dinosaurs the movie has, I would take some pages out of The Lost World novel and the JP game. Carnotaurus should be included with its octopus-like camouflage. There could be a very creepy sequence of the main characters trying to avoid a Carnotaurus stalking them. And As much as the game did wrong, I liked the introduction of the Troodons as fearless, terrifying creatures with paralyzing venom. Their nesting behavior alone would be worth the inclusion.  Biosyn could be researching the camo system of the carnos and venom of the Troodons or maybe even the Dilophosaurs.

Just a small taste of what I've been coming up with. I know its really the opposite direction of what most people want JP4 to be like, so I don't expect many people to like it. But honeslty, JP3 filled my quota of giant dinosaurs chasing people with no plot between.

And Doomz, sorry it took so long to get back to you about my JP toys. I found out my parents put them into storage, so I'm gonna try and find some time to go down and check out what I've got.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 01, 2012, 12:05:11 AM
Your idea is really good!

Heck with it, make Jurassic Park: The Game into a movie :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Oct 01, 2012, 12:09:43 AM
Quote from: Gate on Sep 30, 2012, 05:19:32 PM
This sort of thing just can't be rushed.

Only had 11 years so far.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Oct 01, 2012, 12:12:22 AM
And however many months (weeks[?]) of actually developing a script.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Oct 01, 2012, 12:18:12 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 01, 2012, 12:05:11 AM
Your idea is really good!

Heck with it, make Jurassic Park: The Game into a movie :P

Hah I wouldn't mind that. Maybe switch some stuff around. The Merc characters were actually decent, but could use some work so that you could really care about them.

The problem with having movies about creatures/monsters is that most audience members seem to find it laughable. So you either need to embrace the goofiness, or find some way to transcend the genera and make a movie beyond what people thought it would be like. Rise of the Planet of the Apes comes to mind, which is why I'm so excited to see what they come up with for Jp4.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 01, 2012, 01:24:27 AM
I don't recall many people finding Jurassic Park on the whole, comedic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Oct 01, 2012, 01:31:19 AM
Not at all, no. But I know a lot of my friends and people I know think that by the third film, the whole series was just goofy. The first two movies were good for adults and kids, but rarely used stupid gags for humor. I'm not trying to generalize the series or the whole monster movie genera, it's just that Jurassic Park is my favorite movie ever, and I strongly believe that it can be more than just a movie about dinosaurs chasing people.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Oct 01, 2012, 01:42:57 AM
None of them were just about monster chasing people.  Though the third did have more of that.  More fun than the second, and consequently less serious.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 01, 2012, 01:53:01 AM
Quote from: Remonster on Oct 01, 2012, 01:31:19 AM
Not at all, no. But I know a lot of my friends and people I know think that by the third film, the whole series was just goofy. The first two movies were good for adults and kids, but rarely used stupid gags for humor. I'm not trying to generalize the series or the whole monster movie genera, it's just that Jurassic Park is my favorite movie ever, and I strongly believe that it can be more than just a movie about dinosaurs chasing people.

Quote from: SM on Oct 01, 2012, 01:42:57 AM
None of them were just about monster chasing people.  Though the third did have more of that.  More fun than the second, and consequently less serious.

It's all the third movie was. It had no depth whatsoever. The first film was about the limits of humanity's perceived ability to control things, the second was about capital greed. The third was about...nothing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Oct 01, 2012, 01:56:16 AM
The first and second movie had more than that, but the third movie was basically land on island, run from Dinosaurs. There could've been so much more to it, but they didn't bother.

Maybe I need to be more clear with what I'm saying, but what I mean is that I hope the fourth movie is more than that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Oct 01, 2012, 01:59:36 AM
Quote from: Remonster on Oct 01, 2012, 01:56:16 AM
The first and second movie had more than that, but the third movie was basically land on island, run from Dinosaurs. There could've been so much more to it, but they didn't bother.

Maybe I need to be more clear with what I'm saying, but what I mean is that I hope the fourth movie is more than that.

I don't see a problem with that to be honest.  After the ridiculous third act of Lost World, I enjoyed the simplicity of the third film.  Not that I'm eager to see it repeated, mind you.  It's been done - give us something different next time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 01, 2012, 02:03:32 AM
Quote from: Remonster on Oct 01, 2012, 01:56:16 AM
The first and second movie had more than that, but the third movie was basically land on island, run from Dinosaurs. There could've been so much more to it, but they didn't bother.

Maybe I need to be more clear with what I'm saying, but what I mean is that I hope the fourth movie is more than that.

What type of central theme do you think could be explored?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Oct 01, 2012, 02:11:43 AM
Yeah, I agree to a certain extent. I was thankful for the return to the island after TLW sucked it up in San Diego. Also Grant being the main focus was amazing for me. While It wasn't as good as I would've liked, it's still a movie that I can sit down and enjoy. It's the same with TLW. I absolutely love that movie, but once they get to the main land It loses my attention.

But that just brings me back to where I would like Jp4 to go, which is in a different direction. In the first movie, I liked disparity between the clean, sterile laboratory's surrounded by lush tropical jungle, and it's a setting that i'd love to see again.

As for a central theme, I'm honestly not sure. I would like a more personal story, and I would like to see more of what TLW novel featured with some dinosaurs not developing certain social skills with the lack of natural parenting.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 01, 2012, 01:47:10 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Oct 01, 2012, 02:11:43 AM
Yeah, I agree to a certain extent. I was thankful for the return to the island after TLW sucked it up in San Diego. Also Grant being the main focus was amazing for me. While It wasn't as good as I would've liked, it's still a movie that I can sit down and enjoy. It's the same with TLW. I absolutely love that movie, but once they get to the main land It loses my attention.

The mainland sequence was awesome. There was something really fun about seeing a T.Rex in the kid's backyard. Maybe because I had the same fantasy myself as a kid.

Quote from: Remonster on Oct 01, 2012, 02:11:43 AM
As for a central theme, I'm honestly not sure. I would like a more personal story, and I would like to see more of what TLW novel featured with some dinosaurs not developing certain social skills with the lack of natural parenting.

That's a plot device at best. Good thing to have, but it's not a theme. I'm talking a sort of message the overall film would carry.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Oct 01, 2012, 03:05:50 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 01, 2012, 01:47:10 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Oct 01, 2012, 02:11:43 AM
Yeah, I agree to a certain extent. I was thankful for the return to the island after TLW sucked it up in San Diego. Also Grant being the main focus was amazing for me. While It wasn't as good as I would've liked, it's still a movie that I can sit down and enjoy. It's the same with TLW. I absolutely love that movie, but once they get to the main land It loses my attention.

The mainland sequence was awesome. There was something really fun about seeing a T.Rex in the kid's backyard. Maybe because I had the same fantasy myself as a kid.

I never had a problem with that sequence either, never understood the flak it gets.

What I didn't like was that the film totally lacked the sense of wonder of the first one, portrayed the dinosaurs more as monsters than animals, spent about ten minutes bumping off a bit-character in a ludicrous scenario (Dieter Stark), that both the tyrannosaurs continued to track the scent of their baby after they'd already gotten it back (and, for that matter, they didn't explain why the rexes returned to destroy the trailers until some time afterwards), that to a large degree they stuck with the same dinosaur species, that they made all that effort to totally rewrite the story yet apparently didn't have time to develop sympathetic characters or to flesh out the baddies, and that practically the only thing they did carry over from the book was Malcolm's newly sombre and comparatively humourless demeanour (which I didn't like in Crichton's novel either).
And probably some other stuff I'm forgetting.

As it was still Spielberg directing, we had plenty of awesome, memorable sequences in a well-made film, but I thought it was badly written.

Also thought they missed an opportunity to emphasise a conservationist theme in there, that stripmining an ecosystem can turn a buck but is ultimately short-sighted, has dangerous ramifications and kills something beautiful. Obviously they touched on these points, but I don't think they drove it home hard enough - the first film wore its grander themes with pride and that helped make it more than just a creature feature.
Could also have drawn a picture of the merits of ecotourism versus stripmining, by portraying the dinosaurs as more natural and peaceful early on while Hammond's team studies them.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Oct 01, 2012, 03:35:25 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Oct 01, 2012, 03:05:50 PM


I never had a problem with that sequence either, never understood the flak it gets.

What I didn't like was that the film totally lacked the sense of wonder of the first one, portrayed the dinosaurs more as monsters than animals, spent about ten minutes bumping off a bit-character in a ludicrous scenario (Dieter Stark), that both the tyrannosaurs continued to track the scent of their baby after they'd already gotten it back (and, for that matter, they didn't explain why the rexes returned to destroy the trailers until some time afterwards), that to a large degree they stuck with the same dinosaur species, that they made all that effort to totally rewrite the story yet apparently didn't have time to develop sympathetic characters or to flesh out the baddies, and that practically the only thing they did carry over from the book was Malcolm's newly sombre and comparatively humourless demeanour (which I didn't like in Crichton's novel either).
And probably some other stuff I'm forgetting.

As it was still Spielberg directing, we had plenty of awesome, memorable sequences in a well-made film, but I thought it was badly written.

Also thought they missed an opportunity to emphasise a conservationist theme in there, that stripmining an ecosystem can turn a buck but is ultimately short-sighted, has dangerous ramifications and kills something beautiful. Obviously they touched on these points, but I don't think they drove it home hard enough - the first film wore its grander themes with pride and that helped make it more than just a creature feature.
Could also have drawn a picture of the merits of ecotourism versus stripmining, by portraying the dinosaurs as more natural and peaceful early on while Hammond's team studies them.

If there was anything I hated about the TLW novel, it was Malcolm. The mathematician became a dinosaur expert for no discernable reason, and just would not shut up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Oct 01, 2012, 06:06:59 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 01, 2012, 01:47:10 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Oct 01, 2012, 02:11:43 AM
Yeah, I agree to a certain extent. I was thankful for the return to the island after TLW sucked it up in San Diego. Also Grant being the main focus was amazing for me. While It wasn't as good as I would've liked, it's still a movie that I can sit down and enjoy. It's the same with TLW. I absolutely love that movie, but once they get to the main land It loses my attention.

The mainland sequence was awesome. There was something really fun about seeing a T.Rex in the kid's backyard. Maybe because I had the same fantasy myself as a kid.

Quote from: Remonster on Oct 01, 2012, 02:11:43 AM
As for a central theme, I'm honestly not sure. I would like a more personal story, and I would like to see more of what TLW novel featured with some dinosaurs not developing certain social skills with the lack of natural parenting.

That's a plot device at best. Good thing to have, but it's not a theme. I'm talking a sort of message the overall film would carry.

Yeah, I wasn't saying that would be the theme, just something in the background that the characters could be focusing on.

What would you like to see the focus on for a central theme?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 01, 2012, 06:42:54 PM
The theme could be "Life will always find a way, as well as dead end...." 

(Hence the part when everyone gets eaten by a dino :laugh:)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 01, 2012, 08:29:30 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Oct 01, 2012, 06:06:59 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 01, 2012, 01:47:10 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Oct 01, 2012, 02:11:43 AM
Yeah, I agree to a certain extent. I was thankful for the return to the island after TLW sucked it up in San Diego. Also Grant being the main focus was amazing for me. While It wasn't as good as I would've liked, it's still a movie that I can sit down and enjoy. It's the same with TLW. I absolutely love that movie, but once they get to the main land It loses my attention.

The mainland sequence was awesome. There was something really fun about seeing a T.Rex in the kid's backyard. Maybe because I had the same fantasy myself as a kid.

Quote from: Remonster on Oct 01, 2012, 02:11:43 AM
As for a central theme, I'm honestly not sure. I would like a more personal story, and I would like to see more of what TLW novel featured with some dinosaurs not developing certain social skills with the lack of natural parenting.

That's a plot device at best. Good thing to have, but it's not a theme. I'm talking a sort of message the overall film would carry.

Yeah, I wasn't saying that would be the theme, just something in the background that the characters could be focusing on.

What would you like to see the focus on for a central theme?

I'm not sure we could have one at this point. I was going to suggest some sort of amalgamation of the two from the first two films, but TLW was more or less that, in a sense. Peter Ludlow wanted to control the dinosaurs (JP theme) for his profit gains (TLW theme) but ended up losing out in the end.

I think that's good enough for a fourth film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Oct 06, 2012, 05:43:57 PM
I wonder if the 4th movie should be based on the Chaos Effect toy line? I remember those toys had Dinosaur fusions.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 06, 2012, 05:46:43 PM
For the love of God, no.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Oct 06, 2012, 05:47:34 PM
As much as I liked those toys, they should never go that way in the movies.

Ever.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Oct 06, 2012, 06:10:26 PM
The toys seem awesome, I always wanted them as a kid. I think the idea of them being used in the movie would be terrible unless they can pull it off somehow.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Oct 06, 2012, 06:12:58 PM
While I wouldn't want mutant dinosaurs like the toys (however cool they are), seeing deformities in test tubes ala Alien Resurrection could be interesting.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 06, 2012, 06:42:48 PM
Laufey reminded me of Bernie Wrightson; here's a kick-ass cover he did for a recent Jurassic Park comic:
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fryalltime.files.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F05%2Fjp4-cover-wrightson-72.jpg&hash=578802942664a2b4ae1c94257a65a259acc5efcf)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 06, 2012, 09:28:31 PM
Spielberg needs to lay off his "i need an OSCAR!" campaign with War Horse and Lincoln and just do

HumanDinosaurhybrids with guns: the movie.  :laugh:

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/18166 (http://www.aintitcool.com/node/18166)

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/398419_412851575431516_155298834_n.jpg)

is it a f**king crazy concept? Hell yeah. Would i watch the hell out of this movie? Hell Yeah.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightlord on Oct 06, 2012, 09:32:48 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Oct 06, 2012, 09:28:31 PM
Spielberg needs to lay off his "i need an OSCAR!" campaign with War Horse and Lincoln and just do

HumanDinosaurhybrids with guns: the movie.  :laugh:


http://www.aintitcool.com/node/18166 (http://www.aintitcool.com/node/18166)

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/398419_412851575431516_155298834_n.jpg)
Throw a lab coat on that guy and we have the Lizard  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 06, 2012, 09:34:01 PM
Reminds me of the hypothetical 'Homosaurus' -- a fictional descendant of Troodon formosus and an answer to 'what if Dinosaurs did not go extinct?'
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F--unrI-c80mU%2FT4_nzeBEf6I%2FAAAAAAAALME%2FC88ot4d9DFg%2Fs1600%2FEn%2Bun%2Bplaneta%2Bcomo%2Bel%2Bnuestro%2C%2Bla%2Bera%2Bde%2Blos%2Bdinosaurios%2Bpodr%25C3%25ADa%2Bno%2Bhaberse%2Btruncado%2B%25283%2529.jpg&hash=117edd23459b66d336d74760a4bbaaa58c2a3c87)
Thing creeped the living scaly f**k out of me as a kid. I certainly don't want it in my JP. Thank you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 06, 2012, 09:36:14 PM
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_C6ZTrAk5e7o/SuFyDDo3goI/AAAAAAAAAWk/COyYcoZyn-Y/s1600-h/IMG_1401.JPG (http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_C6ZTrAk5e7o/SuFyDDo3goI/AAAAAAAAAWk/COyYcoZyn-Y/s1600-h/IMG_1401.JPG)

cant get this concept image to work with the [img] code so here's the link. Nice teeth.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 06, 2012, 09:56:32 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Oct 06, 2012, 09:36:14 PM
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_C6ZTrAk5e7o/SuFyDDo3goI/AAAAAAAAAWk/COyYcoZyn-Y/s1600-h/IMG_1401.JPG (http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_C6ZTrAk5e7o/SuFyDDo3goI/AAAAAAAAAWk/COyYcoZyn-Y/s1600-h/IMG_1401.JPG)

cant get this concept image to work with the [img] code so here's the link. Nice teeth.  :laugh:

Where is that from?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 06, 2012, 10:42:34 PM
Jurassic Park 4 Concept art from Carlos Huante. He presented it during a "monster design" lesson, i believe.

It was made for this rejected script for the fourth film. http://www.aintitcool.com/node/18166 (http://www.aintitcool.com/node/18166)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 07, 2012, 04:03:47 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Oct 06, 2012, 06:42:48 PM
Laufey reminded me of Bernie Wrightson; here's a kick-ass cover he did for a recent Jurassic Park comic:
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fryalltime.files.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F05%2Fjp4-cover-wrightson-72.jpg&hash=578802942664a2b4ae1c94257a65a259acc5efcf)

That is one, mean-looking carnosaur.

*sigh* I miss the old JP toys. Hasbro screwed everything up when it bought Kenner :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Oct 07, 2012, 04:39:23 PM
I had a dream the other night that JP4 was about a dinosaur spirit that could shape shift into other dinosaurs. And it took place in Antarctica, and Grant was there for some reason. Also he had a beard. Pretty much The Thing with dinosaurs. It was awful.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 07, 2012, 10:21:58 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 07, 2012, 04:03:47 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Oct 06, 2012, 06:42:48 PM
Laufey reminded me of Bernie Wrightson; here's a kick-ass cover he did for a recent Jurassic Park comic:
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fryalltime.files.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F05%2Fjp4-cover-wrightson-72.jpg&hash=578802942664a2b4ae1c94257a65a259acc5efcf)

That is one, mean-looking carnosaur.

*sigh* I miss the old JP toys. Hasbro screwed everything up when it bought Kenner :'(

Tell me about it  :(

No more rubber dinos.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 09, 2012, 03:48:30 PM
I want the bull and thrasher T.Rexes!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 09, 2012, 05:26:19 PM
I have Thrasher  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 09, 2012, 05:27:37 PM
I have this... :P

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RoUcB_Opbk#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RoUcB_Opbk#ws)

Some of you may have seen these before. Sorry.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 09, 2012, 09:56:09 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Oct 09, 2012, 03:48:30 PM
I want the bull and thrasher T.Rexes!

The Thrasher is freaking expensive. A MIB on eBay goes for $250 minimum.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Oct 09, 2012, 10:19:42 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 09, 2012, 09:56:09 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Oct 09, 2012, 03:48:30 PM
I want the bull and thrasher T.Rexes!

The Thrasher is freaking expensive. A MIB on eBay goes for $250 minimum.

You what? How much out of the box with a slightly bent tail?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 09, 2012, 10:22:56 PM
Last one I saw was $115 or so. And that was a complete one too, with capture gear.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Oct 09, 2012, 11:13:04 PM
Hot damn. I was literally days away from giving mine to charity.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Njm1983 on Oct 09, 2012, 11:49:42 PM
Guess I should hang on to my JP and TLW toys... though they are well used, since me and a bunch of friends turned half the backyard into Jurassic park and site B. Good times as a kid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Oct 10, 2012, 12:05:44 AM
Concept art from the scrapped Jurassic Park IV.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/rorschachsrants/news/?a=68431 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/rorschachsrants/news/?a=68431)

Not sure if this is real or not. :-\

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.comicbookmovie.com%2Fimages%2Fusers%2Fuploads%2F8073%2Fjurassic43.jpg&hash=2fd2df216a1d9cff62561dac38501e8923ae739e)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.comicbookmovie.com%2Fimages%2Fusers%2Fuploads%2F8073%2Fjurassic42.jpg&hash=318060dcfc977dc0ecba9cd2030399a13abbe081)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.comicbookmovie.com%2Fimages%2Fusers%2Fuploads%2F8073%2Fjurassic41__span.jpg&hash=5c97916aa47970fadeba707b35b201c2ca4e46b4)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 10, 2012, 12:08:53 AM
Yeah it's real. And it's old news actually. Some of those are from Carlos Huante and ILM.

I posted this in the previous page:

Spoiler
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/398419_412851575431516_155298834_n.jpg)
[close]

It's worth noting that the Monahan/Sayles script was actually quite liked by the guy who read it... i'll say this much.. whatever they are actually concocting up for a new take on Jurassic Park 4... it aint gonna rock as hard as dinos with madafaking guns. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Oct 10, 2012, 12:14:27 AM
I will not lie, if I saw those things in real life I'd probably build a house out of all the bricks I would shit.


Those are f**king terrifying.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Oct 10, 2012, 12:15:59 AM
Yeah, they're not bad designs. Nothing I would want to see in a Jurassic Park movie however.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 10, 2012, 12:16:57 AM
..listen to your inner 5 year old, Laufey.. he would LOVE this shit.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Oct 10, 2012, 12:18:31 AM
Perhaps. But my older self tells me this would be cool to see in a movie that isn't linked to Jurassic Park. They could do all things of f**ked up things without disappointing the fans if they made their own movie out of this. And I would be there to see it. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Oct 10, 2012, 12:19:03 AM
Though inappropriate for Jurassic Park, I think they were all fairly nicely designed until I saw the triceratops humanoid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Oct 10, 2012, 02:19:35 AM
Quote from: Laufey on Oct 10, 2012, 12:05:44 AM
Concept art from the scrapped Jurassic Park IV.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/rorschachsrants/news/?a=68431 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/rorschachsrants/news/?a=68431)

Quotehttp://media.comicbookmovie.com/images/users/uploads/8073/jurassic44.jpg


...


Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FvOUAo.png&hash=773c1ff44974d4afe0e8c9ef19035d0e993f49b1)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Oct 10, 2012, 02:22:44 AM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Oct 10, 2012, 02:19:35 AM
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FvOUAo.png&hash=773c1ff44974d4afe0e8c9ef19035d0e993f49b1)
[close]

:-X
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Oct 10, 2012, 03:35:48 AM
The movie sound like it would been the A:R of the JP series. The idea of Dinosaurs and Humans together sound stupid IMO.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 10, 2012, 03:55:40 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xqvCs2yc8E#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xqvCs2yc8E#ws)  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 10, 2012, 04:38:13 AM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Oct 10, 2012, 03:35:48 AM
The movie sound like it would been the A:R of the JP series. The idea of Dinosaurs and Humans together sound stupid IMO.

Have to agree; dino-humanoids are just WTF.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Oct 10, 2012, 04:41:40 AM
Man, talk about a bullet dodged. The designs are decent, but the idea of Dino-human-dog hybrids just makes my head hurt.

I just want Carnotaurus that has camouflage similar to cephalopods
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 10, 2012, 04:49:14 AM
Eh It would have been topical.. http://news.discovery.com/tech/human-animal-hybrid-chimera-splice-slide-show.htm (http://news.discovery.com/tech/human-animal-hybrid-chimera-splice-slide-show.htm)

and it would have carried on the "we are building dinos with frog dna" theme of hybridization from the first film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Oct 10, 2012, 05:04:06 AM
It's using the Dinosaurs as soldiers that are being trained in a Swiss Castle by a Mercenary that really gets to me. A movie about A corporation messing with Dino DNA could be cool, but using them as soldiers in a Dino-special forces and giving them Ancient Greek names is beyond stupid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 10, 2012, 05:14:40 AM
It's irreverent and FUN. :laugh: (and doesnt repeat the stuff from the 3 films.. wich i fear they might end up doing in their new take on jurassic park 4 ... simply because it's the "safe" idea to go with.)

how dare they do this on a franchise that already had a girl use gymnastics to fight a velociraptor... and a dinosaur literally shit out a cellphone. :laugh:

Jurassic park has already "jumped the shark"... er.. "shat the cellphone".. they might as well go all the way.  :laugh: (just kidding)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Oct 10, 2012, 05:18:23 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Oct 10, 2012, 05:14:40 AM
It's irreverent and FUN. :laugh:

how dare they do this on a franchise that already had a girl use gymnastics to fight a velociraptor... and a dinosaur literally shit out a cellphone. :laugh:

Jurassic park has already "jumped the shark"... er.. "shat the cellphone".. they might as well go all the way.  :laugh: (just kidding)

Or "went to San Diego."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Oct 10, 2012, 05:37:32 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Oct 10, 2012, 05:14:40 AM
"shat the cellphone"

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.ffffound.com%2Fstatic-data%2Fassets%2F6%2F619d6315f5806b69aa4fd6b418d91bea7930b4bc_m.gif&hash=546ec1ce5e8b7a6bb3fa245863e1945d08e868d4)

Can we use that term instead, permanently, please?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 10, 2012, 05:48:30 AM
I'd like to trademark it. I could use some cash  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 10, 2012, 06:13:16 AM
Quote from: RagingDragon on Oct 10, 2012, 05:37:32 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Oct 10, 2012, 05:14:40 AM
"shat the cellphone"

http://img.ffffound.com/static-data/assets/6/619d6315f5806b69aa4fd6b418d91bea7930b4bc_m.gif

Can we use that term instead, permanently, please?
That gif! :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Oct 10, 2012, 06:19:09 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Oct 10, 2012, 05:48:30 AM
I'd like to trademark it. I could use some cash  :laugh:
Would be lucrative; it would get plenty of f**king use! :laugh:

Quote from: OmegaZilla on Oct 10, 2012, 06:13:16 AM
That gif! :laugh:
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fblogfiles.wfmu.org%2FKF%2F2010%2F11%2F30%2Fgif_jack350.gif&hash=efe52c46f9edf86d7a463ea4f1c5570d48b9ba5c)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 10, 2012, 06:20:43 AM
Both are going to be used a lot, ossshahahaha!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Oct 10, 2012, 04:00:34 PM
Gah, you're making me want to watch One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest now! :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: chupacabras acheronsis on Oct 10, 2012, 09:55:47 PM
what's that bullshit

when they said Special Forces dinosaurs i thought they meant something like Dino riders

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F_gp-AbW71BaU%2FTLIWN5bMppI%2FAAAAAAAADEM%2F2W5v5DQR52Y%2Fs1600%2Fdino-riders.jpg&hash=1f288e32f963268906649f0bd828d75ce3521de8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Oct 10, 2012, 10:23:30 PM
Curse you scientists and your 'research'! (http://www.theage.com.au/technology/sci-tech/spielbergs-jurassic-lark-is-just-for-the-movies-20121010-27dll.html)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightlord on Oct 10, 2012, 10:27:06 PM
Quote from: SM on Oct 10, 2012, 10:23:30 PM
Curse you scientists and your 'research'! (http://www.theage.com.au/technology/sci-tech/spielbergs-jurassic-lark-is-just-for-the-movies-20121010-27dll.html)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi4.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fy118%2FDorAlice%2Fanimated_gif_and_other_stuff%2Fluke-skywalker.gif&hash=8f89e6308610cca411564549c6aa52db0b808708)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Oct 10, 2012, 10:36:10 PM
Well, they didn't get the DNA from Dino bones in the movie. Thanks, for nothing, article.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Oct 10, 2012, 10:37:14 PM
Pretty sure they extracted proteins from a tyrannosaurus bone a couple of years ago.

Not denying the chance of obtaining a workable amount of DNA from any single dinosaur species is extremely remote, but I'm not sure that research is accurate.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Oct 10, 2012, 10:43:17 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 10, 2012, 04:38:13 AM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Oct 10, 2012, 03:35:48 AM
The movie sound like it would been the A:R of the JP series. The idea of Dinosaurs and Humans together sound stupid IMO.

Have to agree; dino-humanoids are just WTF.

Yeah. Good designs too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Oct 10, 2012, 10:52:36 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Oct 10, 2012, 10:36:10 PM
Well, they didn't get the DNA from Dino bones in the movie. Thanks, for nothing, article.

Quote
A study by ancient DNA researchers at Western Australia's Murdoch University has found the hereditary material cannot survive more than 6.8 million years. Most dinosaurs died out 65 million years ago.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 10, 2012, 11:11:51 PM
Ah well. One can dream in the meantime.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Oct 11, 2012, 03:19:26 AM
Ah, but we can always make more Chicken-dinos!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 11, 2012, 03:36:37 AM
Arr. That be true.

And once humanity gains complete mastery over genetic engineering... we'll be able to "genetically sculpt" our own dino's.. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Oct 11, 2012, 03:57:36 AM
I can't see that back firing in any way!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Oct 11, 2012, 03:59:43 AM
How could anyone dream up a human-dino spliced mutation for a Jurassic Park movie?  It sounds dumb right off the bat.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 11, 2012, 04:01:00 AM
rumour has it that it was spielberg himself who came up with it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Oct 11, 2012, 04:14:41 AM
And it still sounds dumb :P For Jurassic Park, at least.

Give it a different name, and maybe it'll be interesting.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Oct 11, 2012, 04:23:46 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Oct 11, 2012, 04:01:00 AM
rumour has it that it was spielberg himself who came up with it.
I find myself doubting that rumor.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 11, 2012, 05:50:19 AM
I wouldnt be that doubtful.. considering his latest track record.  :laugh:

http://filmdrunk.uproxx.com/2011/10/spielberg-says-nuking-the-fridge-was-his-idea-not-george-lucas (http://filmdrunk.uproxx.com/2011/10/spielberg-says-nuking-the-fridge-was-his-idea-not-george-lucas)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Oct 11, 2012, 06:58:27 AM
But George Lucas said the same thing about it being his idea  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 11, 2012, 02:06:29 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Oct 11, 2012, 04:23:46 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Oct 11, 2012, 04:01:00 AM
rumour has it that it was spielberg himself who came up with it.
I find myself doubting that rumor.
I'm with you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 12, 2012, 12:18:59 AM
It was his own idea, no joke. I wish I had a source but I recall when JP IV was first considered, Spielberg's first script involved raptor-soldiers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 12, 2012, 01:57:41 AM
Regarding the Dinos with guns script:

From http://www.aintitcool.com/node/18166 (http://www.aintitcool.com/node/18166)

QuoteSteven Spielberg has been quoted as saying that they had the "mother of all ideas" for this sequel, and that if they'd come up with it earlier, this would have been the third film. He claims this will completely reinvigorate the franchise, and Kathleen Kennedy promises that it's nothing like the other films so far. Normally, those sorts of comments could be dismissed as hype... but in this case, they're not kidding around. Bill Monahan wrote the first draft based on a story by Spielberg. Monahan's a busy guy, but most of his stuff hasn't hit the screen yet, so don't feel bad if you don't recognize his name. Ridley Scott's wrapping up work on his KINGDOM OF HEAVEN right now, and wants to make TRIPOLI at some point, while Martin Scorsese is just gearing up to make THE DEPARTED, which Monahan adapted from the Hong Kong thriller INFERNAL AFFAIRS.

oh and btw.. Joe Johnston said in 2010...

QuoteJoe:  Well, you know, Universal and Steven will want to keep making these movies as long as they're successful, and who knows?  We may see the Monahan/Sayles version come back.

http://www.hitfix.com/blogs/motion-captured/posts/jurassic-park-iv-absolutely-does-not-feature-gun-toting-dinosaurs (http://www.hitfix.com/blogs/motion-captured/posts/jurassic-park-iv-absolutely-does-not-feature-gun-toting-dinosaurs)

bring it!  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 12, 2012, 08:46:46 AM
If that ever gets made I'm going to curl up under my bed sheets and never return. If its not a Jurassic Park then sweet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 12, 2012, 10:39:10 AM
Guys relax. I think Spielberg has realised the error of his idea at this point.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Oct 12, 2012, 01:44:08 PM
I wouldn't mind seeing the Asylum take on that concept, TBH. That would be some funny sh*t.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Oct 12, 2012, 03:13:17 PM
Come on Spielberg, if you want to flex those kid muscles, pull out all the stops and do a proper Turok movie!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.valiantfan.com%2Fvaliant%2FCD%2Fvh1%2FTurok%2Fturok02.jpg&hash=549929eae18af89537b80269752ae3414329f1da)

I'd go see the shit out of Spielberg's TUROK!  Gonna be fantasizing about that all day now...

Someone cast Turok, I was thinking Daniel Day Lewis??
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 12, 2012, 03:21:09 PM
No whitewashing. Turok is a native american character.. let's keep him that way.

(The last of the mohicans doesnt count, Daniel day lewis was an adopted white in that)  :laugh:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F_baA00BuQ7Vs%2FS1Zi_PzEh0I%2FAAAAAAAAAt4%2Fk2WvjEJ2nmA%2Fs400%2FWes_Studi1.jpg&hash=6b79e85102ee092f89c6f43aab939a1a5d90a1a5)

^ a pity that he's too old for the role :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Oct 12, 2012, 03:23:10 PM
Lmao, thought he was just a pale Native American. :laugh:  Maybe the Apocalypto guy?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 12, 2012, 03:31:07 PM
a suspiciously very pale native american :laugh:

Rudy Youngblood? I approve :)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg2.bdbphotos.com%2Fimages%2Forig%2Fj%2Fi%2Fjij0nm3xh7c5c73.jpg&hash=09c3ecb19e62814069c6cbe68a073a9f00412a39)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Oct 12, 2012, 04:15:12 PM
I thought it was maybe one of those 1/8th Native American things. :laugh:  He'd be a good Turok, although a bit young.

Goddamn, now I'm going to have to track down those old Valiant comics.  I have a whole range of Armorines, which are amazing.  Valiant, in general, was an incredible company.  Oh the 90's when comics could still manage some originality. :-[
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 12, 2012, 09:41:55 PM
I'd rather see a Turok movie based on the latest game from 2008. I swear I had an actor in mind but his name escapes me right now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Oct 12, 2012, 10:23:21 PM
The dinosaur designs from 2008 Turok were great, but the story would need a lot of improvement if they were to make a movie out of that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 12, 2012, 10:41:51 PM
It's a better story than the previous games. Did they even have a story?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Oct 12, 2012, 11:26:38 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 12, 2012, 10:41:51 PM
It's better story than the previous games. Did they even have a story?

Stop evil guy or Eldritch abomination from taking over the world. That's about it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Oct 13, 2012, 07:49:47 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAzQr3Ml0UI#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAzQr3Ml0UI#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 13, 2012, 08:00:15 PM
I love them garbage bag tests.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Oct 13, 2012, 09:27:29 PM
sucks how that has now become...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fprodcentral.com%2Fgreenscreen-studios-photo-slideshow%2Fdata%2Fimages%2Fgreenscreen-studios1.jpg&hash=7f8b219ed6580b260ec0fd7be764c17ef0b395ca)

and

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.flickr.com%2F188%2F427118273_016649d2b5.jpg&hash=2bb6dfaee5bf28e47a6aec30e6df96c63959748f)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Oct 13, 2012, 09:29:59 PM
Jurassic Park is one of those movies where the CG, in my opinion, is completely seamless with the practical effects.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 14, 2012, 03:01:34 AM
Quote from: MrSpaceJockey on Oct 13, 2012, 07:49:47 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAzQr3Ml0UI#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAzQr3Ml0UI#ws)

Absolutely fantastic.  Real magicians right there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shinawi on Oct 19, 2012, 02:53:04 AM
It would be neat to have Lex Murphy become the next owner of InGen.
Her brother becomes a real estate investor who works at InGen from time to time.
They could appear in the next Jurassic Park movie.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1145.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fo506%2Feesang2012%2Favp%2FAriana3.jpg&hash=56a69284880827549e64082c8453199d121726f1)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1145.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fo506%2Feesang2012%2Favp%2FAriana.jpg&hash=ff5d8430681aed9f273eaf6bb6f0c0e443a41c4d)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1145.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fo506%2Feesang2012%2Favp%2FAriana2.jpg&hash=01d2a15b611c7866839d33eb925f6ec2c583a252)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 19, 2012, 10:35:05 AM
She hasn't developed well.

:D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Oct 19, 2012, 01:34:21 PM
I thought the recent Turok game from 2008 sucked. A Turok movie should be based on the N64 games since they appear to follow the comics that they where based on nicely.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 19, 2012, 01:43:52 PM
It was OK. My only real problem with it was the super-unbalanced enemy AI.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Oct 19, 2012, 01:56:30 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 19, 2012, 01:43:52 PM
It was OK. My only real problem with it was the super-unbalanced enemy AI.

The problem is that it needed to be more than OK to live up to the original games.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 19, 2012, 02:18:52 PM
Turok and Turok 2 are the only original game worthy of merit though. The follow-ups weren't that good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Oct 19, 2012, 03:27:05 PM
Turok Evolution is a question mark of a game and of a production in general. There has GOT to be some history behind that game's troubled presentation; there are seeds of a coherent story, but then story events that are referenced that never even happened; major narrative objects without prior set up... yet when anything to do with story is presented, it's done in a way that implies an overarcing story. It's literally so mind boggling that it requires an essay to touch on completely. On top of that, the gameplay was fun, the weapons were inventive, and the musical score... I mean, what the hell? It was one of the best produced musical scores I've heard in a game, yet it seems like it was created for the game that never came to be.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Oct 19, 2012, 03:36:53 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 19, 2012, 01:43:52 PM
It was OK. My only real problem with it was the super-unbalanced enemy AI.

I found it dull and forgettable. It sucks that Nintendo owns the IP to the original games now which means no XBLA and PSN re-releases of the N64 games. I remember the rumors of Adam Beach (Cowboys & Aliens) playing Turok in a movie a few years back.

Since we got both a Godzilla movie and a Dinosaur Pixar movie in 2014 then maybe JP4 can move a bit faster after 2014.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Oct 19, 2012, 03:49:09 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 19, 2012, 02:18:52 PM
Turok and Turok 2 are the only original game worthy of merit though. The follow-ups weren't that good.

Gotta agree with this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 19, 2012, 06:42:10 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Oct 19, 2012, 03:36:53 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 19, 2012, 01:43:52 PM
It was OK. My only real problem with it was the super-unbalanced enemy AI.

I found it dull and forgettable. It sucks that Nintendo owns the IP to the original games now which means no XBLA and PSN re-releases of the N64 games. I remember the rumors of Adam Beach (Cowboys & Aliens) playing Turok in a movie a few years back.

Since we got both a Godzilla movie and a Dinosaur Pixar movie in 2014 then maybe JP4 can move a bit faster after 2014.

Fair enough. I did like the setting and the voice acting was quite good. When the game was working, it was a lot of fun. The knife kills were awesome and the dinosaurs themselves looked really cool.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Oct 19, 2012, 07:11:16 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 19, 2012, 06:42:10 PM
Fair enough. I did like the setting and the voice acting was quite good. When the game was working, it was a lot of fun. The knife kills were awesome and the dinosaurs themselves looked really cool.

I know a lot of people who love the new Turok.  None would probably say it stands up to the originals, relative to when they were released, but it's definitely a cult hit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Oct 19, 2012, 07:17:46 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Oct 19, 2012, 03:27:05 PM
Turok Evolution is a question mark of a game and of a production in general. There has GOT to be some history behind that game's troubled presentation; there are seeds of a coherent story, but then story events that are referenced that never even happened; major narrative objects without prior set up... yet when anything to do with story is presented, it's done in a way that implies an overarcing story. It's literally so mind boggling that it requires an essay to touch on completely. On top of that, the gameplay was fun, the weapons were inventive, and the musical score... I mean, what the hell? It was one of the best produced musical scores I've heard in a game, yet it seems like it was created for the game that never came to be.

It was the only Turok I ever played. The only part of it I really 'loved' besides the guns and music was the war portion of it. Fighting street by street, in the sewers against the lizard menace, escaping a crumbling city, riding a terror bird thing against the lizard war machine, saving a city and messing up that beach landing near the end then finally taking on that final boss.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Oct 19, 2012, 07:33:11 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Oct 19, 2012, 03:27:05 PM
Turok Evolution is a question mark of a game and of a production in general. There has GOT to be some history behind that game's troubled presentation; there are seeds of a coherent story, but then story events that are referenced that never even happened; major narrative objects without prior set up... yet when anything to do with story is presented, it's done in a way that implies an overarcing story. It's literally so mind boggling that it requires an essay to touch on completely. On top of that, the gameplay was fun, the weapons were inventive, and the musical score... I mean, what the hell? It was one of the best produced musical scores I've heard in a game, yet it seems like it was created for the game that never came to be.

Agreed. Even the original trailers pointed at a much bigger and epic game.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OAstaY38N_U# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OAstaY38N_U#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Oct 19, 2012, 09:09:57 PM
Did anyone see the animated Turok movie?  I always meant to get to it, but I never saw it (I guess somewhere inside, I thought the animation sucked).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shinawi on Oct 20, 2012, 07:38:26 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 19, 2012, 10:35:05 AM
She hasn't developed well.

:D
Then she could do a supporting role.

The lady below could be the main character:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1145.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fo506%2Feesang2012%2Favp%2Flotl.jpg&hash=0aa952eb9936409956c1c0cf5b7a6bb297287e11)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 20, 2012, 02:08:36 PM
Who is she?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Oct 20, 2012, 07:59:01 PM
Omega might have some fun with this one:

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=68981 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=68981)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 20, 2012, 08:04:12 PM
I love Winston Studios' garbage bag tests. Same thing they did with the Alien Queen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 21, 2012, 03:26:32 PM
Now she's my kind of woman!

http://www.worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=26458&count=0 (http://www.worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=26458&count=0)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Oct 21, 2012, 03:28:10 PM
I knew she went into art, but I had no clue she was coming back into acting!

Would be great for her to return in a Tremors 5 (wink wink, nudge nudge).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 22, 2012, 11:33:11 AM
I just bought the JP Series II Utahraptor from eBay. Loose figure, but complete with all accessories. Pics when it arrives!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shinawi on Oct 22, 2012, 12:01:43 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 20, 2012, 02:08:36 PM
Who is she?
She is Anna Friel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Oct 24, 2012, 06:45:28 PM
QuoteJurassic Park 3D (trailer #1)  10/19/2012  2:07  Universal Pictures

it's coming
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Oct 24, 2012, 07:05:53 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Oct 24, 2012, 06:45:28 PM
QuoteJurassic Park 3D (trailer #1)  10/19/2012  2:07  Universal Pictures

it's coming

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-snc6%2F251364_212212268910153_1258273835_n.jpg&hash=5d103312be13d14a7ec79de3e5a4f2d7a13343ff)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Oct 24, 2012, 10:43:09 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Oct 24, 2012, 07:05:53 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Oct 24, 2012, 06:45:28 PM
QuoteJurassic Park 3D (trailer #1)  10/19/2012  2:07  Universal Pictures

it's coming

http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc6/251364_212212268910153_1258273835_n.jpg
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_mbv8bwoZaC1qmasf2.png&hash=c68a7cfdf60eaf1ffb61995972572b50d86d5d5e)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Oct 24, 2012, 11:09:02 PM
Did anyone actually check that date before getting excited?


10/19/2012

10/19/

That was 5 days ago.

Unless this year, they added 7 new months and it's getting released the tenth day of that seventh new month.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 25, 2012, 01:57:26 PM
Yeah, I was just gonna say. Otherwise, IGN would have had it posted for sure.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Oct 26, 2012, 09:36:43 AM
I posted the date it was rated...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 26, 2012, 10:34:15 AM
There's no mention of that :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Oct 26, 2012, 10:39:37 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 26, 2012, 10:34:15 AM
There's no mention of that :P

I thought it was pretty obvious, I'm not retarded enough to post a release date after the day has passed. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 26, 2012, 10:41:48 AM
Are you sure now? ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Nov 06, 2012, 06:50:34 PM
per JP FB page:

QuoteThe most phenomenal discovery of our time...becomes the greatest 3D adventure of all time. Come back tomorrow to see the new poster for Jurassic Park 3D- in theaters April 5, 2013!

(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/545368_470139353030953_597792179_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Nov 06, 2012, 06:52:51 PM
Kind of excited. For some weird reason.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 06, 2012, 07:45:35 PM
This arrived last week 8)

http://instagram.com/p/RlS69LlEjJ/ (http://instagram.com/p/RlS69LlEjJ/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Nov 06, 2012, 08:51:12 PM
Wow, that takes me back.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 07, 2012, 02:11:39 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Nov 06, 2012, 06:50:34 PM
per JP FB page:

QuoteThe most phenomenal discovery of our time...becomes the greatest 3D adventure of all time. Come back tomorrow to see the new poster for Jurassic Park 3D- in theaters April 5, 2013!

https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/545368_470139353030953_597792179_n.jpg

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_lp2lxeTJd71qzmpuho1_500.gif&hash=8d233944f378d93a834a75159b6fb0f05522ec47)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Feral_PRED on Nov 07, 2012, 08:28:03 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsphotos-b.ak.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-ak-prn1%2F21257_470548322990056_1108411846_n.jpg&hash=536cb58c451971e552d04798ad5fc67b7be8eab0)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Nov 07, 2012, 08:33:30 PM
HD;

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FM8dOD.jpg&hash=34897977b39903b3c7a11b4d91d395b250b6ac68)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Nov 07, 2012, 08:35:28 PM
Jurassic Park is one of the first movies I saw in a theater as a child. I can not wait to experience that on the big screen again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Nov 07, 2012, 08:36:14 PM
Awesome poster. Don't really care about the 3D, but I can't wait to see this on the big screen. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 07, 2012, 09:10:10 PM
YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Nov 07, 2012, 09:26:10 PM
This poster made my day. Jurassic Park holds a lot of nostalgia for me and I would love to see it on the IMAX big screen. I was only two years old in 1993, but I did watch the movie a lot on VHS when I was like 3 years old in 1994. I did see The Lost World: Jurassic Park and Jurassic Park III in theaters though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Nov 07, 2012, 10:26:22 PM
I'm ready. This is my favorite film ever.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 07, 2012, 11:05:29 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Nov 07, 2012, 08:33:30 PM
HD;

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FM8dOD.jpg&hash=34897977b39903b3c7a11b4d91d395b250b6ac68)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gifguppy.com%2Fcss%2Fimages%2Fmovies%2Fbloodsport.gif&hash=259fea995263b05b2b7614dca13876801d9cf4b4)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 07, 2012, 11:10:24 PM
God Damnit. Saw Lost World and 3 in theaters but i didnt get the chance to see the original as it should be seen on the silver screen.

I AINT MISSING THIS CHANCE!

:laugh:  ;D  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Nov 08, 2012, 12:00:39 AM
OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD!!!!

I'm literally bouncing up and down from excitement on my seat. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Nov 08, 2012, 12:03:23 AM
Wow guys, I knew about JP's 3D release back in April. Think I even posted about it.  :laugh:

Here's the trailer that's been out since spring:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OJHESaX_ow#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OJHESaX_ow#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Nov 08, 2012, 12:06:46 AM
I'm pretty sure we all knew.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Nov 08, 2012, 12:08:30 AM
I don't know, you all sound super excited as if this the first time hearing of it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Nov 08, 2012, 12:11:28 AM
Excited about the poster, yes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Nov 08, 2012, 12:48:49 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfhnW7by-xg#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfhnW7by-xg#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCl5Qj6IPCY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCl5Qj6IPCY#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mike’s Monsters on Nov 08, 2012, 12:58:15 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Nov 08, 2012, 12:03:23 AM
Wow guys, I knew about JP's 3D release back in April. Think I even posted about it.  :laugh:

Here's the trailer that's been out since spring:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OJHESaX_ow#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OJHESaX_ow#ws)

That's the blu-ray release trailer.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Nov 08, 2012, 07:08:16 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Nov 07, 2012, 08:33:30 PM
HD;

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FM8dOD.jpg&hash=34897977b39903b3c7a11b4d91d395b250b6ac68)

It's finally hitting me. This is happening. This is actually happening.

Oh Jesus, I'm so happy right now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Keg on Nov 08, 2012, 12:30:11 PM
I think I'll take my nephew. I was 7 years old when I saw it at the cinema and it absolutely blew my mind. He'll be 5 so a bit younger but I'm sure he'll love it.

Thinking of the 3D I actually think this film should work really well if the conversion is good. I'm thinking of scenes like the Raptor jumping up and snapping at Lex in the ceiling, the Gallimimus stampede etc. Wasn't planned for 3D but scenes like those certainly will look great.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: AvatarIII on Nov 08, 2012, 01:11:51 PM
Quote from: Keg on Nov 08, 2012, 12:30:11 PM
I think I'll take my nephew. I was 7 years old when I saw it at the cinema and it absolutely blew my mind. He'll be 5 so a bit younger but I'm sure he'll love it.

Thinking of the 3D I actually think this film should work really well if the conversion is good. I'm thinking of scenes like the Raptor jumping up and snapping at Lex in the ceiling, the Gallimimus stampede etc. Wasn't planned for 3D but scenes like those certainly will look great.

that's the problem with 3D movies, because the director directs with 3D in mind, which then looks rubbish in 2D.
directors should direct with 2D in mind, and it will probably look awesome in 3D anyway.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Nov 08, 2012, 01:35:08 PM
Quote from: Alienhunter15 on Nov 07, 2012, 08:28:03 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsphotos-b.ak.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-ak-prn1%2F21257_470548322990056_1108411846_n.jpg&hash=536cb58c451971e552d04798ad5fc67b7be8eab0)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbbsimg.ngfiles.com%2F1%2F24195000%2Fngbbs50428c7193ce9.jpg&hash=4bd549eda25496a628f1dc42f01a19c317a276b5)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 08, 2012, 02:34:48 PM
You can bet I'll be refreshing my browser the night before advance tickets go on sale.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Nov 08, 2012, 03:27:18 PM
Eh, I like the film, but not enough to risk a headache over it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 08, 2012, 03:35:26 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Nov 08, 2012, 12:03:23 AM
Wow guys, I knew about JP's 3D release back in April. Think I even posted about it.  :laugh:

Here's the trailer that's been out since spring:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OJHESaX_ow#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OJHESaX_ow#ws)

Wow. I was nearly overwhelmed with emotion at the end of that. dat John Williams score :')
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Nov 08, 2012, 05:04:45 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on Nov 08, 2012, 01:11:51 PM

that's the problem with 3D movies, because the director directs with 3D in mind, which then looks rubbish in 2D.
directors should direct with 2D in mind, and it will probably look awesome in 3D anyway.

'Tis true. Titanic's the most potent use of 3D I've seen, and the format wasn't even a twinkle in JC's eye when Kate Winslett was getting all wet over Leo.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 08, 2012, 06:31:52 PM
TRAILER! ;D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jH9iAHSKds#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jH9iAHSKds#ws)

Oh God...so excited!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Nov 08, 2012, 06:51:09 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 08, 2012, 06:31:52 PM
TRAILER! ;D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jH9iAHSKds#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jH9iAHSKds#ws)

Oh God...so excited!
Wonderful.

You know, I don't think I ever saw this on the big screen when I was a kid. I'm gonna feel like my six year old self again when I sit down to watch this in April. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 08, 2012, 06:55:14 PM
I missed the film by a year, so I never saw it on the big screen either. I (and my inner child as well) am so excited to change that in Apirl! ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 08, 2012, 07:34:52 PM
Ha, you guys suck. I saw it twice on the big screen this past February ;D 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 08, 2012, 07:38:01 PM
Was not particularly fond of how they remixed the score to be completely honest.

Otherwise, do like bas-relief logo.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Nov 08, 2012, 08:42:55 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 08, 2012, 06:31:52 PM
TRAILER! ;D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jH9iAHSKds#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jH9iAHSKds#ws)

Oh God...so excited!

My body is so ready for this, no way am I missing this in theaters.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 08, 2012, 09:36:31 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Nov 08, 2012, 07:38:01 PM
Was not particularly fond of how they remixed the score to be completely honest.

Otherwise, do like bas-relief logo.

Me neither, but my excitement doesn't give a shit!!!!!!!!  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 08, 2012, 09:42:03 PM
I KNOW RIGHT

APRIL CAN'T COME SOON ENOUGH

The situation warrants the extensive use of caps lock.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 09, 2012, 01:45:58 PM
Calm yourself man, you'll hurt something.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: stephen on Nov 10, 2012, 09:42:36 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Nov 08, 2012, 05:04:45 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on Nov 08, 2012, 01:11:51 PM

that's the problem with 3D movies, because the director directs with 3D in mind, which then looks rubbish in 2D.
directors should direct with 2D in mind, and it will probably look awesome in 3D anyway.

'Tis true. Titanic's the most potent use of 3D I've seen, and the format wasn't even a twinkle in JC's eye when Kate Winslett was getting all wet over Leo.

Actually not true.  Cameron wanted to film Titanic in 3D but the tech wasn't there yet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Nov 10, 2012, 01:15:27 PM
I hope the 3D looked better then Episode I did. The only 3D re-release movies that I seen in theaters are Nightmare Before Christmas and Episode I. NBC is the only one that looked good in 3D while the 3D in Episode looked very meh.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Nov 10, 2012, 03:26:17 PM
I thought TPM 3D looked really good for a post-production 3D.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 10, 2012, 03:33:10 PM
Aside from the opening scroll, I didn't even notice any 3D, to be honest. I just loved seeing the film again in theaters.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Nov 10, 2012, 03:38:58 PM
The opening scroll and the pod race look good in 3D, but that's about it. I hope the 3D in this movie looks good in IMAX.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Nov 10, 2012, 04:02:45 PM
Near birthday time! Gahhh...must see.


Excellent use of John Samuel Hanson's Pandora in trailer, too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Nov 10, 2012, 04:13:30 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Nov 10, 2012, 03:38:58 PM
The opening scroll and the pod race look good in 3D, but that's about it. I hope the 3D in this movie looks good in IMAX.

Yeah, I hardly noticed "3D depth" in the scenes that were in space. I'll admit, the only scene I enjoyed was the Pod Race (what was even better was the fact they extended it!)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 10, 2012, 04:14:29 PM
Did they? I remember hearing rumors about that, but didn't pick up on anything when I saw it. What exactly was added?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Nov 10, 2012, 04:45:14 PM
 I remember it being 12 minutes long whereas the theatrical release was 7-8 minutes. There was at least three added scenes:
Dawn Before the Podrace—Anakin gets up early to prepare the pod for the race and has a brief chat with Padmé.
Complete Podrace Grid Sequence—This scene shows more of the participating racers and creatures in the crowd, later added on DVD.
Extended Podrace Lap Two—This lap shows some more of Sebulba's "creative interpretation of the rules" and further proof of just how special Anakin is, later added on DVD.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Nov 10, 2012, 04:47:43 PM
Yes, TPM 3D had extra scenes. It really surprised me. Is the blu-ray cut the same? I've not seen it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Nov 10, 2012, 05:05:09 PM
TPM has been extended since its DVD release, so I'd imagine so.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Nov 10, 2012, 05:13:38 PM
Quote from: TJ Doc on Nov 10, 2012, 05:05:09 PM
TPM has been extended since its DVD release, so I'd imagine so.

f**k, you're right. Just checked. The fact I only watched the DVD release once a long time ago (I don't own it) probably explains why I didn't remember anything about the extra scenes. I own the good ol' VHS release. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Nov 10, 2012, 05:36:34 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Nov 10, 2012, 04:47:43 PM
Yes, TPM 3D had extra scenes. It really surprised me. Is the blu-ray cut the same? I've not seen it.
Seeing how the 3D version had CGI Yoda in it, I'm sure it's the same cut as released on blu-ray. The only film that has not been retouched in it's home video release is Revenge of the Sith. The only minor 'change' in that is the use of a different transition effect near the end of the film after Padmes birth scene.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Nov 10, 2012, 05:37:34 PM
Thank God for the CGI Yoda. TPM's muppet was awful and didn't look like the original one at all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 11, 2012, 01:32:32 AM
http://www.collegehumor.com/video/6617410/jurassic-park-characters-awful-realization (http://www.collegehumor.com/video/6617410/jurassic-park-characters-awful-realization)

^ that relates to this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_R81ZN2qn8#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_R81ZN2qn8#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 14, 2012, 01:54:23 AM
She arrived in the mail today ;D

http://instagram.com/p/R_elKKFEvU/ (http://instagram.com/p/R_elKKFEvU/)
http://instagram.com/p/R_e0oilEvm/ (http://instagram.com/p/R_e0oilEvm/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Nov 14, 2012, 01:58:57 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 14, 2012, 01:54:23 AM
She arrived in the mail today ;D

http://instagram.com/p/R_elKKFEvU/ (http://instagram.com/p/R_elKKFEvU/)
http://instagram.com/p/R_e0oilEvm/ (http://instagram.com/p/R_e0oilEvm/)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimageshack.us%2Fscaled%2Flanding%2F843%2Fpetepostlethwaitelostwo.jpg&hash=700847732df64a4e8d03eddf8c8484929191050c)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Nov 14, 2012, 02:06:06 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 14, 2012, 01:54:23 AM
She arrived in the mail today ;D

http://instagram.com/p/R_elKKFEvU/ (http://instagram.com/p/R_elKKFEvU/)
http://instagram.com/p/R_e0oilEvm/ (http://instagram.com/p/R_e0oilEvm/)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Femotibot.net%2Fpix%2F5113.jpg&hash=31fd6124c7ac395f75bb7837f2e787e20ec677df)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 14, 2012, 02:08:17 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 14, 2012, 01:54:23 AM
She arrived in the mail today ;D

http://instagram.com/p/R_elKKFEvU/ (http://instagram.com/p/R_elKKFEvU/)
http://instagram.com/p/R_e0oilEvm/ (http://instagram.com/p/R_e0oilEvm/)

Awesome stuff!

I still have mine in really good condition, I think, though I'm missing some of the capture gear.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Nov 14, 2012, 02:13:14 AM
I like how the 3D re-release trailer is trying to make the movie seem like a brand new film. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Nov 14, 2012, 02:19:58 AM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Nov 14, 2012, 02:13:14 AM
I like how the 3D re-release trailer is trying to make the movie seem like a brand new film.
Which is great. A lot of the newer kids have never seen the film. It might be testing the waters.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Nov 14, 2012, 02:21:57 AM
I was only two in 1993, so I never saw it on the big screen. I do remember watching the first movie when I was three in 1994. I doubt they will re-release the sequels since most people hated them.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 14, 2012, 02:34:57 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 14, 2012, 01:54:23 AM
She arrived in the mail today ;D

http://instagram.com/p/R_elKKFEvU/ (http://instagram.com/p/R_elKKFEvU/)
http://instagram.com/p/R_e0oilEvm/ (http://instagram.com/p/R_e0oilEvm/)

:P damn. that's an awesome figure :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 14, 2012, 03:02:28 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Nov 14, 2012, 01:58:57 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 14, 2012, 01:54:23 AM
She arrived in the mail today ;D

http://instagram.com/p/R_elKKFEvU/ (http://instagram.com/p/R_elKKFEvU/)
http://instagram.com/p/R_e0oilEvm/ (http://instagram.com/p/R_e0oilEvm/)
http://imageshack.us/scaled/landing/843/petepostlethwaitelostwo.jpg

Yup, he'd be proud.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 14, 2012, 03:22:14 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 14, 2012, 01:54:23 AM
She arrived in the mail today ;D

http://instagram.com/p/R_elKKFEvU/ (http://instagram.com/p/R_elKKFEvU/)
http://instagram.com/p/R_e0oilEvm/ (http://instagram.com/p/R_e0oilEvm/)

Brothers!

However, I'm sure yours is in better condition, and I don't have  the capture gear  :(

*sigh*  kid's toys will never be the same....

Spoiler
Not that we're kids
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 14, 2012, 03:39:22 AM
I can't get the mouth to stay open though. Apparently opening it whilst pushing down on the back of head is supposed to trigger a spring but nothing happens in my case.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 14, 2012, 03:40:54 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 14, 2012, 03:39:22 AM
I can't get the mouth to stay open though. Apparently opening it whilst pushing down on the back of head is supposed to trigger a spring but nothing happens in my case.

I don't remember the mouth having a feature like that, but if you move the tail side to side, the head movies side to side as well (so he can 'thrash' his way out of the gear he's being held in).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Nov 14, 2012, 03:43:53 AM
Gawd, all this talk is making me feel all warm inside. Like it's 1997 all over again, when I had these figures.

Show of hands, who had the Dieter Stark figure with the Compy which magnetizes to his chest? Or the Carter figure with the dirt bike? :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 14, 2012, 03:46:31 AM
I have the magnetic figure! Even bought a second compy used at a flea market so I could more accurately reenact the scene! :D

Man, I need to dig these toys out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Nov 14, 2012, 03:48:38 AM
Haha, awesome! Unfortunately I don't have mine anymore. :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 14, 2012, 03:49:28 AM
I surprisingly found the mobile command center research trailers  (which I love to death) at a flee market for only $1.50.

Boy, I hope they make an accurate die-cast model of those trailers in the future!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Nov 14, 2012, 03:50:57 AM
I used to have that. But I could never get the rubber thing (which goes between the trailers) to stay on. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 14, 2012, 03:52:39 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Nov 14, 2012, 03:50:57 AM
I used to have that. But I could never get the rubber thing (which goes between the trailers) to stay on. :D

Yeah, that's a pain in the ass.  I wonder what vehicles they'll have in JPIV.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 14, 2012, 03:54:03 AM
I still have a ton of my toys from when I was younger. I have a lot of JP figures, Star Wars stuff, Legos... Man, so much awesome stuff.

Anyone else have the jeep that the hunters used in TLW?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Nov 14, 2012, 03:56:57 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 14, 2012, 03:54:03 AM
Anyone else have the jeep that the hunters used in TLW?

Is that the one with the two chairs that can move foward on each side?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 14, 2012, 03:59:06 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Nov 14, 2012, 03:56:57 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 14, 2012, 03:54:03 AM
Anyone else have the jeep that the hunters used in TLW?

Is that the one with the two chairs that can move foward on each side?

No, not the one I have at least. The one I have has a regular driver seat, and a passenger seat that extended outward like the one in the film. If I recall correctly, it also had a net (like the film) and a turret (unlike the film :P ).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Nov 14, 2012, 03:59:59 AM
Ah yes. I remember now. And a part of the front end comes off as 'dino damage.' :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 14, 2012, 04:02:38 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Nov 14, 2012, 03:56:57 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 14, 2012, 03:54:03 AM
Anyone else have the jeep that the hunters used in TLW?

Is that the one with the two chairs that can move foward on each side?

There's that, then there's the Snagger wich is the Humvee that captures the Pacheosephlasaurus (however you spell that  ("Friar Tuck!")) And then there's the Mercedees AAVs "Gatherer"




.................




f**k.  I need to watch this movie now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 14, 2012, 04:03:11 AM
Yep. This one here :)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbimg2.mlstatic.com%2Fnet-trapper-de-jurasik-park-the-lost-world-kenner_MLM-F-3198477127_092012.jpg&hash=705348690331f7b551bdc84ed9db673ee4e155c6)

I also had this. According to the interwebs, its called the "gatherer's high ride":

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fjplegacy.org%2Ftoys%2Fmoviecustom%2Fhighhide.jpg&hash=824418adf5482617e7f3886348991a3a80057bb3)

You could even clamp it to something so its up high like in the film. I would always tip the toybox sideways and clamp it to the box :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Nov 14, 2012, 04:06:37 AM
Awesome! At first I though you were referring to this, which I had. :)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimageshack.us%2Fscaled%2Flanding%2F17%2Flwhunterhumveevehicle1b.jpg&hash=b6d5d880d06197164767676ab32ec1f15b58b8a7)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 14, 2012, 04:07:42 AM
Huh, don't think I've ever even seen that one.

I always wanted one of the tour jeeps from the first film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Nov 14, 2012, 04:09:03 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 14, 2012, 04:07:42 AM
I always wanted one of the tour jeeps from the first film.

Ohmygodyes. That's one toy that has always alluded me when I was younger.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 14, 2012, 04:12:47 AM
I don't think I had very much from the first film, apart from human figures of Grant, Ellie, and Malcolm. I kinda wasn't on the Earth when the first film came out, though, so that might exaplain why :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 14, 2012, 04:13:18 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 14, 2012, 03:40:54 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 14, 2012, 03:39:22 AM
I can't get the mouth to stay open though. Apparently opening it whilst pushing down on the back of head is supposed to trigger a spring but nothing happens in my case.

I don't remember the mouth having a feature like that, but if you move the tail side to side, the head movies side to side as well (so he can 'thrash' his way out of the gear he's being held in).

It does; both features. The gear has to be somewhat loose though for that to happen.

Quote from: First Blood on Nov 14, 2012, 03:43:53 AM
Gawd, all this talk is making me feel all warm inside. Like it's 1997 all over again, when I had these figures.

Show of hands, who had the Dieter Stark figure with the Compy which magnetizes to his chest?

*hand up*!

Quote from: Requiem28 on Nov 14, 2012, 03:49:28 AM
I surprisingly found the mobile command center research trailers  (which I love to death) at a flee market for only $1.50.

Boy, I hope they make an accurate die-cast model of those trailers in the future!

That's *flea ;) $1.50!? You're joking.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Nov 14, 2012, 04:14:24 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 14, 2012, 04:12:47 AM
I don't think I had very much from the first film, apart from human figures of Grant, Ellie, and Malcolm. I kinda wasn't on the Earth when the first film came out, though, so that might exaplain why :P

Yeah, most of my collection came from The Lost World, all I had from the first film was Grant and Muldoon with his awesome over-the-top rocket launcher.

Quote from: Requiem28 on Nov 14, 2012, 04:02:38 AM
f**k.  I need to watch this movie now.

Tell me about it. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 14, 2012, 04:15:27 AM
I remember not being particularly fond of the JPIII toys, in comparison to the TLW ones. The figures and dinosaurs were a bit smaller in scale... :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Nov 14, 2012, 04:17:18 AM
Yup, I didn't care for them either. Too small and they had characters like 'military general' who wasn't even in the movie??
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 14, 2012, 04:18:24 AM
Well, the ending with the army, I guess.

I gotta admit, that cheesy army scene did get me a cool helicopter and pilot toy from that line of figures 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Nov 14, 2012, 04:19:55 AM
I remember that! The back end of the 'copter came off as damage. And the pilot had this awesome red helmet on. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Nov 14, 2012, 04:21:29 AM
I didn't had any JP3 toys when I was 10 neither. The toys for JP and TLW are so much better IMO.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 14, 2012, 04:21:44 AM
@ Doom, my bad.  But yeah $1.50.  As you can expect, it was missing a few parts. Lol

@ Nightmare, I didn't really like the JPIII toys either for that fact.  Plus, the only rubber dino was this guy that I wanted my thrasher T-Rex to tear up.....

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ftoyarchive.com%2FSTAForSale%2FNEW2001%2B%2FJurassicPark%2FJurassicPark3%2FJP3SmallSpinosaurusLoose1a.jpg&hash=accadbc201984a746bce6f3f6d1413d2e1dbacb1)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 14, 2012, 04:26:21 AM
Yeah, I wanted to get the big Spino as well to go up against my TLW thrasher T-Rex. Never did come up with the money for it, though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 14, 2012, 04:29:15 AM
You can already see the quality difference from Kenner to Hasbro.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 14, 2012, 03:39:32 PM
The Hasbro toys, the ones they made themselves, sucked. Period. They were oversized, awful-looking Carnegie Collection models with electronic sound effects. The only good JP toys that Hasbro released are repaints of the original Kenner toys; go figure.

The only Hasbro JP toy that impressed me was the big Spino. Too bad that one goes for higher-than-I'd like prices on eBay, ha.

Quote from: Requiem28 on Nov 14, 2012, 04:02:38 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Nov 14, 2012, 03:56:57 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 14, 2012, 03:54:03 AM
Anyone else have the jeep that the hunters used in TLW?

Is that the one with the two chairs that can move foward on each side?

There's that, then there's the Snagger wich is the Humvee that captures the Pacheosephlasaurus (however you spell that  ("Friar Tuck!")) And then there's the Mercedees AAVs "Gatherer"


Pachycephalosaurus ;D

I wonder if the day will come when the bleeding heart lefties start crying over its name claiming racism :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 14, 2012, 03:42:44 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 14, 2012, 03:39:32 PM
Carnegie Collection models

Oh man, I still have all of mine up on my shelf in my room!!! Those things were really nice.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 14, 2012, 03:44:51 PM
I've got a small handful, and I'll always be a fan. They're great for dioramas. Plus they look awesome to boot.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 14, 2012, 03:52:06 PM
Sorry for the poor quality, but I just snapped a few quick pics of mine :)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi959.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fae77%2Fproject412%2F614_5664.jpg&hash=3d6e0ba2445062636bef4a117f4d5f0f9dccea00)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi959.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fae77%2Fproject412%2F614_5665.jpg&hash=12fd33a34780bb30670faa87f63c07adf840a6a6)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi959.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fae77%2Fproject412%2F614_5666.jpg&hash=ad0e54bbdc6b6f30b37baa112efb834b0ce55c1f)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi959.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fae77%2Fproject412%2F614_5667.jpg&hash=9819e9362329cd7ae301dd49bf006979d141c324)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi959.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fae77%2Fproject412%2F614_5669.jpg&hash=59d5e0016acc6fe6be6a6548cd26e92e045c4757)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 14, 2012, 03:53:19 PM
Holy Christ, I'm impressed... :o

You even have the T.Rex that is/was exclusive to the Boston Museum of Science :')
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 14, 2012, 03:55:55 PM
Which one is the exclusive one? I don't even remember getting the brown one I was so young, but I think the green one was obtained fairly recently at a flea market. I've only been to the Boston Museum of Science once :)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 14, 2012, 04:13:15 PM
I have that green T.Rex too!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 14, 2012, 04:47:29 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 14, 2012, 03:55:55 PM
Which one is the exclusive one? I don't even remember getting the brown one I was so young, but I think the green one was obtained fairly recently at a flea market. I've only been to the Boston Museum of Science once :)

Top picture, far right side; yellow and blue.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 14, 2012, 05:08:54 PM
Ahh, that one. I think that may have also been a flea market purchase, if I recall correctly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Nov 14, 2012, 07:09:57 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Nov 14, 2012, 04:13:15 PM
I have that green T.Rex too!

Ditto!

I can't even remember where it came from. But it was a loong time ago.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dachande on Nov 14, 2012, 07:36:13 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 14, 2012, 03:39:32 PM
I wonder if the day will come when the bleeding heart lefties start crying over its name claiming racism :D

Well i'm glad i'm not the only one that pronounces it that way!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 14, 2012, 07:38:56 PM
Dachande?!?!?!?

Dude, where... have you been? :o Welcome back!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Nov 14, 2012, 08:22:06 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 14, 2012, 03:39:32 PM
I wonder if the day will come when the bleeding heart lefties start crying over its name claiming racism :D
What makes it racist?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 14, 2012, 08:42:55 PM
Quote from: Dachande on Nov 14, 2012, 07:36:13 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 14, 2012, 03:39:32 PM
I wonder if the day will come when the bleeding heart lefties start crying over its name claiming racism :D

Well i'm glad i'm not the only one that pronounces it that way!

Only one way of pronouncing "Pachy".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 15, 2012, 01:03:04 AM
Papo's dinos are impressive.  I have the Rex and the Spino.  Kinda wish Spino had film accurate coloration, seeing as it clearly sculpted off the design.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 15, 2012, 02:37:32 AM
Damn fool kids will never learn- Dimetrodon ain't no dinosaur.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Nov 15, 2012, 03:59:47 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Nov 14, 2012, 08:22:06 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 14, 2012, 03:39:32 PM
I wonder if the day will come when the bleeding heart lefties start crying over its name claiming racism :D
What makes it racist?

Yeah, I'm lost here
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 15, 2012, 11:52:29 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Nov 15, 2012, 01:03:04 AM
Papo's dinos are impressive.  I have the Rex and the Spino.  Kinda wish Spino had film accurate coloration, seeing as it clearly sculpted off the design.

The Spino design is bleh. The shape of it is wrong.

Quote from: Remonster on Nov 15, 2012, 03:59:47 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Nov 14, 2012, 08:22:06 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 14, 2012, 03:39:32 PM
I wonder if the day will come when the bleeding heart lefties start crying over its name claiming racism :D
What makes it racist?

Yeah, I'm lost here

Pachy=Paki
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Nov 15, 2012, 03:54:18 PM
Picked up The Lost World: Jurassic Park - Behind the Scenes VHS a while ago for less than $1. Sure, I don't have a VHS player anymore, but I owned that tape as a kid and the nostalgia itself was worth it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 15, 2012, 05:34:26 PM
Gimmeeeeee
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Nov 15, 2012, 11:16:14 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 15, 2012, 11:52:29 AM
Quote from: Remonster on Nov 15, 2012, 03:59:47 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Nov 14, 2012, 08:22:06 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 14, 2012, 03:39:32 PM
I wonder if the day will come when the bleeding heart lefties start crying over its name claiming racism :D
What makes it racist?
Yeah, I'm lost here
Pachy=Paki
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdailycartoonist.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2009%2F11%2Fmallard-fillmore-hate-crime.gif&hash=5f8cd288c5039768deb15e9ac4929b57df997d72)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Nov 15, 2012, 11:41:51 PM
I loved that green T-rex toy when I was a kid. I wish I still had it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 16, 2012, 03:24:35 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Nov 15, 2012, 11:16:14 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 15, 2012, 11:52:29 AM
Quote from: Remonster on Nov 15, 2012, 03:59:47 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Nov 14, 2012, 08:22:06 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 14, 2012, 03:39:32 PM
I wonder if the day will come when the bleeding heart lefties start crying over its name claiming racism :D
What makes it racist?
Yeah, I'm lost here
Pachy=Paki
http://dailycartoonist.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/mallard-fillmore-hate-crime.gif

Pahahahahaha :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 08, 2012, 06:26:50 PM
eBay, I love you :) this arrived yesterday!

http://instagram.com/p/S_AqRaFEkF/ (http://instagram.com/p/S_AqRaFEkF/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Dec 08, 2012, 06:36:45 PM
Nice alien in the background!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Dec 08, 2012, 09:46:55 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 08, 2012, 06:26:50 PM
eBay, I love you :) this arrived yesterday!

http://instagram.com/p/S_AqRaFEkF/ (http://instagram.com/p/S_AqRaFEkF/)

Ahhh, that brings back happy memories. I used to carry mine around with me everywhere - restaurants, school, the bathroom. Still have it with the rest of my JP stuff (aside from my Thrasher which was just sold on ebay for the surprisingly meagre sum of £20) in a crate in the garage.
If you plan to unbox it, keep us posted on how many minutes it lasts before the roar/stomp action breaks.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 09, 2012, 07:30:54 AM
Hell no, I'm leaving it sealed inside. I did open it briefly to see which collector's card it came with. See, in 1994 a variation of the original Rex was released, from 1993. They toy was exactly the same, however the box had a slightly different design but some of 1994 ones were released with a different card. See below:

'93 box
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jptoys.com%2Ftoy-database%2Fjurassic-park%2Fjurassic-park-series-1%2Fdinosaurs%2Fred-rex%2Fimg%2Ftrex.jpg&hash=9c4440ac72b18c4f560139b0418373abc0ef14f6)

'94 box
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jptoys.com%2Ftoy-database%2Fjurassic-park%2Fjurassic-park-series-1%2Fdinosaurs%2Fred-rex%2Fimg%2Fjps2redrex.jpg&hash=9814606103bd32c6f0746c9d8d093842fe7c45d3)

'93 card front
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jptoys.com%2Ftoy-database%2Fjurassic-park%2Fjurassic-park-series-1%2Fdinosaurs%2Fred-rex%2Fimg%2Fcollcard_front.jpg&hash=c2a019eb15c0d724635a6ece2a46f26ef61743ce)

'94 card front
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jptoys.com%2Ftoy-database%2Fjurassic-park%2Fjurassic-park-series-1%2Fdinosaurs%2Fred-rex%2Fimg%2Fcollcard2_front.jpg&hash=d425eaed581913cfe5beb6ba9ee66ada09c88573)

Thankfully mine came with the '93 card because I love Brian Franczak's artwork.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Dec 09, 2012, 06:31:41 PM
In my childhood I always wanted a JP T-rex. I'd always look for one when taken to the store thinking "They have these JP toys so they must have a T-rex!".

I never found that T-rex.  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 09, 2012, 06:45:33 PM
That's why we have eBay ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Dec 09, 2012, 06:51:47 PM
I don't want one though anymore.

How long has ebay existed? I don't think it existed back then.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 09, 2012, 06:52:53 PM
It was founded in 1995.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Dec 09, 2012, 06:56:07 PM
What rock was I under? I didn't know of it till like the 00's. Then again we didn't even have a computer till then.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 10, 2012, 12:30:49 AM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Dec 09, 2012, 06:56:07 PM
What rock was I under? I didn't know of it till like the 00's. Then again we didn't even have a computer till then.

I'm going to assume most people are in the same boat.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 10, 2012, 01:00:42 AM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Dec 09, 2012, 06:56:07 PM
What rock was I under? I didn't know of it till like the 00's. Then again we didn't even have a computer till then.

I didn't know about eBay until the 00's either, don't worry. It was small potatoes until then anyway most likely.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Dec 10, 2012, 01:07:09 AM
1995, I would of turned 4 that year.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Dec 16, 2012, 01:10:40 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEXpKda61dg#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEXpKda61dg#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Dec 16, 2012, 01:37:14 AM
I knew about Ebay around 1996 or 1997 when they reference it in a episode of Family Matters (I think).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 16, 2012, 06:25:38 PM
So yeah, yet another item arrived today, oddly enough. I squealed like a little girl 8)

http://instagram.com/p/TTqeT-lEiU/ (http://instagram.com/p/TTqeT-lEiU/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Dec 16, 2012, 06:31:00 PM
Ah yes. The glorious compound. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Dec 16, 2012, 06:40:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 16, 2012, 06:25:38 PM
So yeah, yet another item arrived today, oddly enough. I squealed like a little girl 8)

http://instagram.com/p/TTqeT-lEiU/ (http://instagram.com/p/TTqeT-lEiU/)

Are you buying JP toys?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DJ Pu$$yface on Dec 16, 2012, 09:05:32 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 16, 2012, 06:25:38 PM
So yeah, yet another item arrived today, oddly enough. I squealed like a little girl 8)

http://instagram.com/p/TTqeT-lEiU/ (http://instagram.com/p/TTqeT-lEiU/)

Ah, how glorious childhood was.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 16, 2012, 09:44:30 PM
Quote from: ScardyFox on Dec 16, 2012, 06:40:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 16, 2012, 06:25:38 PM
So yeah, yet another item arrived today, oddly enough. I squealed like a little girl 8)

http://instagram.com/p/TTqeT-lEiU/ (http://instagram.com/p/TTqeT-lEiU/)

Are you buying JP toys?

Yes Sir. I started doing so this past September.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Dec 16, 2012, 10:14:48 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 16, 2012, 09:44:30 PM
Quote from: ScardyFox on Dec 16, 2012, 06:40:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 16, 2012, 06:25:38 PM
So yeah, yet another item arrived today, oddly enough. I squealed like a little girl 8)

http://instagram.com/p/TTqeT-lEiU/ (http://instagram.com/p/TTqeT-lEiU/)

Are you buying JP toys?

Yes Sir. I started doing so this past September.

Ah gotcha. Did you ever see the Discovery special Dinosaur Revolution? It's really good.

EDIT: Wrong name
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Dec 16, 2012, 10:16:08 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 16, 2012, 09:44:30 PM
Yes Sir. I started doing so this past September.

Curious, when you've finished collecting Jurassic Park, are you then moving on to The Lost World? :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 17, 2012, 01:08:15 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Dec 16, 2012, 10:16:08 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 16, 2012, 09:44:30 PM
Yes Sir. I started doing so this past September.

Curious, when you've finished collecting Jurassic Park, are you then moving on to The Lost World? :)

Eventually. I'll move on to Jurassic Park Series II first, which were figures released in 1995 and had a limited run.

Quote from: ScardyFox on Dec 16, 2012, 10:14:48 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 16, 2012, 09:44:30 PM
Quote from: ScardyFox on Dec 16, 2012, 06:40:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 16, 2012, 06:25:38 PM
So yeah, yet another item arrived today, oddly enough. I squealed like a little girl 8)

http://instagram.com/p/TTqeT-lEiU/ (http://instagram.com/p/TTqeT-lEiU/)

Are you buying JP toys?

Yes Sir. I started doing so this past September.

Ah gotcha. Did you ever see the Discovery special Dinosaur Revolution? It's really good.

EDIT: Wrong name

Yes I did! It was good, though Planet Dinosaur was much better. As informative as DR was, I felt like there was a bit too much emphasis place on comedic moments between the dinosaurs in each episode. It felt like they were making a movie almost more so than a documentary.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Dec 17, 2012, 01:12:03 AM
So yeah, Jurassic Park IV huh? Yeah...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Dec 17, 2012, 06:55:49 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 17, 2012, 01:08:15 AM
Yes I did! It was good, though Planet Dinosaur was much better. As informative as DR was, I felt like there was a bit too much emphasis place on comedic moments between the dinosaurs in each episode. It felt like they were making a movie almost more so than a documentary.

Cool cool, I liked it a lot because it was a bit of fresh air with how... personalized the Dinosaurs were through that comedic avenue. Its cool you like dinos so much, I feel like a bit of a relic because its such a strong left over love from my childhood.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Dec 17, 2012, 06:58:15 AM
Wasn't there a concept for part four where scientists mixed dog and human genes with the dinosaurs and then they were trained on how to wield guns?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 17, 2012, 07:05:13 AM
Quote from: ScardyFox on Dec 17, 2012, 06:55:49 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 17, 2012, 01:08:15 AM
Yes I did! It was good, though Planet Dinosaur was much better. As informative as DR was, I felt like there was a bit too much emphasis place on comedic moments between the dinosaurs in each episode. It felt like they were making a movie almost more so than a documentary.

Cool cool, I liked it a lot because it was a bit of fresh air with how... personalized the Dinosaurs were through that comedic avenue. Its cool you like dinos so much, I feel like a bit of a relic because its such a strong left over love from my childhood.
Ever since I was three and watched The Land Before Time, dude. I don't plan on slowing down anytime soon.

I think dinosaurs have been making a comeback in popularity since Jurassic Fight Club aired on History back in 2008. The host, George Blasing, goes on speaking tours around the U.S. speaking to kids, schools, and the like to educate people about dinosaurs and I tip my hat to him. I think part of the problem dinosaurs don't get all the respect they deserve from the general populace, outside of paleontological circles, is because of the way they're presented. My parents think it's weird that at the age of 25, I find them fascinating. There's so much science to behold but mass consumerism demands dinosaurs be seen as a kids only thing.

Quote from: Aspie on Dec 17, 2012, 06:58:15 AM
Wasn't there a concept for part four where scientists mixed dog and human genes with the dinosaurs and then they were trained on how to wield guns?

http://www.ign.com/videos/2012/10/10/news-failed-jurassic-park-4s-almost-human-dinosaurs (http://www.ign.com/videos/2012/10/10/news-failed-jurassic-park-4s-almost-human-dinosaurs)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Dec 17, 2012, 07:45:30 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 17, 2012, 07:05:13 AM
Ever since I was three and watched The Land Before Time, dude. I don't plan on slowing down anytime soon.

Yeah, thats when my affliction started. I would have my mom read me dinosaur books rather than bedtime stories when it was time for bed.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 17, 2012, 07:05:13 AMI think dinosaurs have been making a comeback in popularity since Jurassic Fight Club aired on History back in 2008. The host, George Blasing, goes on speaking tours around the U.S. speaking to kids, schools, and the like to educate people about dinosaurs and I tip my hat to him. I think part of the problem dinosaurs don't get all the respect they deserve from the general populace, outside of paleontological circles, is because of the way they're presented. My parents think it's weird that at the age of 25, I find them fascinating. There's so much science to behold but mass consumerism demands dinosaurs be seen as a kids only thing.

I think there was a wain in popularity because... well, they weren't catchy really. When you read dinosaur stuff it was pictures, when you watched it it was basically pictures and skeletons, etc etc. Now finally technology on a standardized level has caught up for computer animated stories to come in. Bit sad to see imagination (or lack of) caused a hit in popularity but thats OK, its passed.

Meh, nothing weird about it. Everyone has hobbies and interest. I've already started to gather sources for my sons introduction. I try to steer away from ideas to superimpose my interest upon my son (like I won't force him to lift weights or do martial arts, play football, blah blah blah), but I want to... make sure he likes comics and dinosaurs.

I found these little gems for him when he is old enough. :)



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcPxOH7Qe_k# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcPxOH7Qe_k#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shinawi on Dec 17, 2012, 02:21:02 PM
I remember the first time I learned of dinosaurs and other Mesozoic creatures. My dad bought me a dinosaur book on his way back from work. I became fascinated by them and the world they lived in. I collected a lot of books about them. It came to the point some years later that my dad started to worry about my future. So he stopped buying those books.

If I raise kids, I plan to introduce them to dinosaurs in the same way, except I won't prevent them from seeking their own dreams (whatever it would be). Preventing that would be a negative impact in the long run judging from my own experience.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u58TKioxsVs#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u58TKioxsVs#ws)

I remember watching reruns of this movie when I was a very young kid. It was my first dinosaur movie experience. The dinosaurs and the era depicted in this movie wasn't meant to be realistic because it's just a comedy. However, it made a lot of people believe that there were humans during the time of the dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Dec 17, 2012, 05:09:06 PM
Quotehttp://www.ign.com/videos/2012/10/10/news-failed-jurassic-park-4s-almost-human-dinosaurs

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi2.kym-cdn.com%2Fentries%2Ficons%2Foriginal%2F000%2F006%2F482%2Ftemplate.jpg&hash=68d875852aaeddb086c26c06294fe8f0fa610b5f)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Dec 17, 2012, 05:36:02 PM
My first dinosaur experience was the first Jurassic Park! I was two years old. Love them to this day, especially T. Rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Dec 17, 2012, 05:53:36 PM
Quote from: Shinawi on Dec 17, 2012, 02:21:02 PM


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u58TKioxsVs#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u58TKioxsVs#ws)



Lol, I remember watching this with my dad.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 17, 2012, 06:25:40 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidbeneke.com%2FJurassic%2520Park%2Fslides%2Fd3bJP5Rexup2.jpg&hash=43dcbc17a419ba4196459ca9c398d89d26e43e88)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Dec 17, 2012, 06:34:19 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Dec 17, 2012, 06:25:40 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidbeneke.com%2FJurassic%2520Park%2Fslides%2Fd3bJP5Rexup2.jpg&hash=43dcbc17a419ba4196459ca9c398d89d26e43e88)

The BEST!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Dec 17, 2012, 06:35:51 PM
Every time someone badmouths the Dinosaurs with guns Jurassic Park 4 script.. a kitten dies.

Stop this tragedy. Ok? ok.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Dec 17, 2012, 07:32:39 PM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Dec 17, 2012, 05:36:02 PM
My first dinosaur experience was the first Jurassic Park! I was two years old. Love them to this day, especially T. Rex.

I don't even remember my first Dinosaur experience. I don't even know if my love of Dinosaurs is what brought my interest to Godzilla, or Vice-Versa  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 17, 2012, 07:33:41 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Dec 17, 2012, 06:25:40 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidbeneke.com%2FJurassic%2520Park%2Fslides%2Fd3bJP5Rexup2.jpg&hash=43dcbc17a419ba4196459ca9c398d89d26e43e88)

F**K ME!!!!!!!   :o  :o  :o  :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 17, 2012, 07:49:19 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Dec 17, 2012, 06:25:40 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidbeneke.com%2FJurassic%2520Park%2Fslides%2Fd3bJP5Rexup2.jpg&hash=43dcbc17a419ba4196459ca9c398d89d26e43e88)

*sigh* I don't understand. How is it that older tech somehow always looks better than modern tech?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 22, 2012, 10:01:23 PM
Now standing gloriously on my shelf:
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/154711_261684917293082_1431410742_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Dec 22, 2012, 10:07:49 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Dec 22, 2012, 10:01:23 PM
Now standing gloriously on my shelf:
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/154711_261684917293082_1431410742_n.jpg)

All I can think is "ugh, dino bulge."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 22, 2012, 10:22:26 PM
All I can think is "shut up". :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 23, 2012, 02:20:05 AM
Welcome to the "I have a Papo JP T-Rex too" club  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Dec 23, 2012, 06:59:44 AM
Those Papo Dinosaurs look Amazing :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Dec 23, 2012, 09:15:30 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Dec 22, 2012, 10:07:49 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Dec 22, 2012, 10:01:23 PM
Now standing gloriously on my shelf:
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/154711_261684917293082_1431410742_n.jpg)

All I can think is "ugh, dino bulge."

Human nature sucks. Now, because its mentioned, its the first thing I focus on in every pic.

...ef.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Dec 23, 2012, 11:50:57 AM
If only they had more articulation... :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 23, 2012, 11:58:06 AM
Thing's motherf**king out of the film. The sculpt is spectacular. Paintjob's just got minor smear errors (e.g. there's a small orange spot under the left eye) but nothing that cannot be fixed. The jaw articulation is seamless. It's fantastic how they managed to incorporate that.


Good Lord.

It's amazing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 23, 2012, 03:34:06 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Dec 23, 2012, 11:58:06 AM
Thing's motherf**king out of the film. The sculpt is spectacular. Paintjob's just got minor smear errors (e.g. there's a small orange spot under the left eye) but nothing that cannot be fixed. The jaw articulation is seamless. It's fantastic how they managed to incorporate that.


Good Lord.

It's amazing.

If only they'd make one for Godzilla 1998   ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 23, 2012, 03:36:30 PM
Needs to happen sooner or later.

Needs to.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 24, 2012, 03:52:58 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Dec 22, 2012, 10:01:23 PM
Now standing gloriously on my shelf:
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/154711_261684917293082_1431410742_n.jpg)

Nothing beats the Kenner Rexes of yesteryear. Sorry dude.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 24, 2012, 06:15:40 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 24, 2012, 03:52:58 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Dec 22, 2012, 10:01:23 PM
Now standing gloriously on my shelf:
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/154711_261684917293082_1431410742_n.jpg)

Nothing beats the Kenner Rexes of yesteryear. Sorry dude.

Pretty damn close though!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 24, 2012, 06:18:07 PM
Pretty damn superior.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 24, 2012, 06:24:03 PM
No. Never.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 24, 2012, 06:25:14 PM
The statue looks great, very accurate!

Now, if only that company could make a Graboid...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 24, 2012, 06:30:20 PM
Pretty much. With jaw opening articulation and insertable, poseable tongues.

Awfnashfshash. Another thing that is never going to happen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Dec 24, 2012, 06:32:11 PM
We should give the dinos in the next movie guns.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Dec 24, 2012, 06:33:47 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 24, 2012, 06:25:14 PM
Now, if only that company could make a Graboid...

Why would any company make a product that would make them go out of business overnight from stupidity?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Dec 24, 2012, 06:35:03 PM
Quote from: ScardyFox on Dec 24, 2012, 06:33:47 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 24, 2012, 06:25:14 PM
Now, if only that company could make a Graboid...

Why would any company make a product that would make them go out of business overnight from stupidity?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VtBtiAR2tI4#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VtBtiAR2tI4#ws)

This is honestly the best picture of a Graboid I can find, and I'm still not sure I would buy it:
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.badhaven.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F11%2F1383522-metroid.jpg&hash=9acde6388d04a8a963d794ea5990472d734ff0f8)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 24, 2012, 06:41:18 PM
The stupidity in this thread increased by at least 400% in just two posts. That has to account for something.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Dec 24, 2012, 06:46:50 PM
I'm just saying, the company would only be catering to die-hard fans of that video game. Which, in hindsight, is financially illogical.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Dec 24, 2012, 06:54:30 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Dec 24, 2012, 06:41:18 PM
The stupidity in this thread increased by at least 400% in just two posts. That has to account for something.

I am offended by that low number.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Dec 24, 2012, 07:01:30 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Dec 24, 2012, 06:46:50 PM
I'm just saying, the company would only be catering to die-hard fans of that video game. Which, in hindsight, is financially illogical.

I thought he meant the Graboid from Tremors, though your point is valid either way.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 24, 2012, 07:14:04 PM
Hahahaha get it get it, he played on the fact both Graboid and Metroid end in -oid, so he posted Samus Aran, the protagonist of that game. Uuuh sooooo smart. I am right here rolling. Like for real.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Dec 24, 2012, 07:31:10 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Dec 24, 2012, 07:14:04 PM
Hahahaha get it get it, he played on the fact both Graboid and Metroid end in -oid, so he posted Samus Aran, the protagonist of that game. Uuuh sooooo smart. I am right here rolling. Like for real.

It was a game. This was though it was so crappy the company that made them went out of business (overnight) and there was world wide ban on the game itself. Thing was, playing a game, from such a crappy move, actually (somehow) lobotomized you.

I'm not surprised you don't know this.

Reason Aspie does is because he is a Psych major so he has to study these kinds of things.

... or something.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Dec 24, 2012, 07:43:19 PM
I heard watching the Tremors movie was actually an alternate form of torture utilized by the Burmese nationalist military...  the psychological consequencs of that experience must be absolutely devastating.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 24, 2012, 09:02:10 PM
Just seeing 'last post by Aspie' on a thread link on the main page is a great torture...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ShadowPred on Dec 24, 2012, 09:09:41 PM
Well...seeing as how things have gone off topic. I guess JP should be the main point of discussion...because who knows who many more pages we're going to have about Metroids and Graboids, and whatever else.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 24, 2012, 09:11:13 PM
Well what if they made a crossover. Grboids vs metroids vs Dinosaurs. We totaly need that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 24, 2012, 09:29:33 PM
I'm curious to see how the Rex makes his comeback in the fourth film. If it takes place on Isla Sorna, would that imply there's a second family that the Rex from the third film had mated with?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Dec 24, 2012, 09:36:07 PM
Quote from: ShadowPred on Dec 24, 2012, 09:09:41 PM
because who knows who many more pages we're going to have about Metroids and Graboids, and whatever else.

Very sagely
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 24, 2012, 09:44:21 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 24, 2012, 09:29:33 PM
I'm curious to see how the Rex makes his comeback in the fourth film. If it takes place on Isla Sorna, would that imply there's a second family that the Rex from the third film had mated with?

Has it ever been confirmed that the Rex in the third was the baby from TLW? For all we know, even at the time of the sevond movie there were multiple Rex families scattered about.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 24, 2012, 09:47:28 PM
Johnston said somethn g like that in a inter view. Bull . I want the baby Rex back and grow up in th foruth film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 24, 2012, 09:59:53 PM
Omega, why is your typing all messed up right now?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Dec 24, 2012, 10:02:48 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 24, 2012, 09:59:53 PM
Omega, why is your typing all messed up right now?

Quote from: OmegaZilla on Dec 24, 2012, 08:59:31 PM
Holy shit this is the fourth glass
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ShadowPred on Dec 24, 2012, 10:03:26 PM
Alcohol...i do recall in the rec board, or somewhere when he said:

"4th cup!" or something like that.


EDIT Shasvre beat me to it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 24, 2012, 10:04:34 PM
Who forums while he's drunk? Strange stuff.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 24, 2012, 10:04:56 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 24, 2012, 09:59:53 PM
Omega, why is your typing all messed up right now?
I dont know. Yeah my mistake.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Dec 24, 2012, 10:23:37 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 24, 2012, 09:29:33 PM
I'm curious to see how the Rex makes his comeback in the fourth film. If it takes place on Isla Sorna, would that imply there's a second family that the Rex from the third film had mated with?

I think the first thing it should do is show up and kill that God damn Spinosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Dec 24, 2012, 10:31:58 PM
The first Jurassic Park will always remain the best, but as long as the Dinos in part 4 don't interbreed or equip rocket launchers, I'll probably end up seeing it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Dec 24, 2012, 10:34:53 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Dec 24, 2012, 10:31:58 PM
equip rocket launchers

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpuhLkh358Y# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpuhLkh358Y#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Dec 24, 2012, 10:36:35 PM
Quote from: ScardyFox on Dec 24, 2012, 10:34:53 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Dec 24, 2012, 10:31:58 PM
equip rocket launchers

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpuhLkh358Y# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpuhLkh358Y#)

...we must bury that video and keep it from the eyes of Hollywood.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Dec 24, 2012, 10:40:32 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Dec 24, 2012, 10:36:35 PM
Quote from: ScardyFox on Dec 24, 2012, 10:34:53 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Dec 24, 2012, 10:31:58 PM
equip rocket launchers

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpuhLkh358Y# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpuhLkh358Y#)

...we must bury that video and keep it from the eyes of Hollywood.

Not your flavor? Howabout this one?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dKJtjk36u8#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dKJtjk36u8#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 24, 2012, 10:42:55 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Dec 24, 2012, 10:36:35 PM
Quote from: ScardyFox on Dec 24, 2012, 10:34:53 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Dec 24, 2012, 10:31:58 PM
equip rocket launchers

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpuhLkh358Y# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpuhLkh358Y#)

...we must bury that video and keep it from the eyes of Hollywood.

No. Michael Bay needs to direct it. Now.

Quote from: ScardyFox on Dec 24, 2012, 10:23:37 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 24, 2012, 09:29:33 PM
I'm curious to see how the Rex makes his comeback in the fourth film. If it takes place on Isla Sorna, would that imply there's a second family that the Rex from the third film had mated with?

I think the first thing it should do is show up and kill that God damn Spinosaurus.

Save that fight for the end.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Dec 24, 2012, 10:45:48 PM
Quote from: ScardyFox on Dec 24, 2012, 10:40:32 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Dec 24, 2012, 10:36:35 PM
Quote from: ScardyFox on Dec 24, 2012, 10:34:53 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Dec 24, 2012, 10:31:58 PM
equip rocket launchers

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpuhLkh358Y# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpuhLkh358Y#)

...we must bury that video and keep it from the eyes of Hollywood.

Not your flavor? Howabout this one?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dKJtjk36u8#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dKJtjk36u8#ws)
dafuq.
Michael Bay is probably foaming at the mouth right now.


Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 24, 2012, 10:42:55 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Dec 24, 2012, 10:36:35 PM
Quote from: ScardyFox on Dec 24, 2012, 10:34:53 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Dec 24, 2012, 10:31:58 PM
equip rocket launchers

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpuhLkh358Y# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpuhLkh358Y#)

...we must bury that video and keep it from the eyes of Hollywood.

No. Michael Bay needs to direct it. Now.

Quote from: ScardyFox on Dec 24, 2012, 10:23:37 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 24, 2012, 09:29:33 PM
I'm curious to see how the Rex makes his comeback in the fourth film. If it takes place on Isla Sorna, would that imply there's a second family that the Rex from the third film had mated with?

I think the first thing it should do is show up and kill that God damn Spinosaurus.

Save that fight for the end.

Oh you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Dec 24, 2012, 10:48:41 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Dec 24, 2012, 10:45:48 PM

Michael Bay is probably foaming at the mouth right now.

Holy crap, that gave me a good laugh.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 24, 2012, 10:42:55 PMSave that fight for the end.

No way mang, I want them to punctuate the point as a sorry for the travesty of JP3 and rex being killed by that HACKosaurus.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Dec 24, 2012, 10:58:50 PM
Quote from: ScardyFox on Dec 24, 2012, 10:48:41 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 24, 2012, 10:42:55 PMSave that fight for the end.

No way mang, I want them to punctuate the point as a sorry for the travesty of JP3 and rex being killed by that HACKosaurus.



This. So much this.


Also, Camo Carnotaurus from the books. Just saying.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Dec 24, 2012, 11:52:23 PM
They could get away with having the original Rex couple making a comeback. The oldest known Tyrannosaurus was 28 - assume InGen accelerated their growth (I vaguely remember hearing the animals were supposed to be around four years old) and they could still be within that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 25, 2012, 02:57:45 AM
Four years? Which film said this?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Dec 25, 2012, 04:48:19 AM
That might have been in the book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 25, 2012, 07:36:12 AM
Yes. It is mentioned when Wu and Hammond discuss about the Dinosaurs.
No word about it in any of the films. It is still most likely that they applied it or something similar, however -- very convenient.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightlord on Dec 25, 2012, 07:28:28 PM
I'm usually not much one for noticing plotholes but this one is definitely one thats been in my head for years, never affects my enjoyment of the film but goddamn everytime the rappel scene comes on it's so painfully obvious.

Quote■The Hole: The Mountaineering Ninja T-Rex

A classic plot-hole that has bothered me ever since I saw Steven Spielberg's dino epic at the cinema almost 20 years ago, but one which has never sufficiently spoiled the experience of the film for me. When the park security systems go down and the fences lose their charge, the T-Rex forces its way through the useless fence (which is way too flimsy even for an electrified one – talk about lack of a safety net) to attack the tour cars, having enjoyed a pitifully sized goat-shaped snack (it's always seemed a curious idea to me to provide the creature with what is effectively an amuse-bouche to get his appetite up).

She has clearly been able to walk up to said fence in order to eat the goat and then to escape, and yet during the attack, when she pushes the tour car housing Tim back into the enclosure, the car falls down into a tree, and reveals a drop of at least 50 feet (which is a much more intelligent security fail-safe). So how did the T-Rex scale the wall to get to the road? Those tiny arms are clearly not made for climbing of any sorts.

Spielberg apparently didn't care about the plot hole, because the sequence was so thrilling, and he was perhaps right not to care, since it's one of those holes that we forgive in the name of art. And because it inspires a very endearing image of a mountaineering T-Rex, who is clearly also some sort of ninja, thanks to the way she sneaks up on the raptors at the end to save the fleeing humans.
http://whatculture.com/film/10-major-plot-holes-you-probably-missed.php/9 (http://whatculture.com/film/10-major-plot-holes-you-probably-missed.php/9)

Is there actually any explaination to how the rex got onto the road?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Dec 25, 2012, 09:11:43 PM
JPLegacy did a good article about that, actually. Explains how it all works out.

http://jplegacy.org/?ffjpking (http://jplegacy.org/?ffjpking)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightlord on Dec 25, 2012, 09:45:22 PM
Good read and a real good explaination, danke.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Dec 25, 2012, 10:11:29 PM
It's a flub. Simple as.

Once again, I must bring up Sam Jackson's dramatic severed arm. That limb sure knew how to time an entrance.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Dec 25, 2012, 10:13:58 PM
Not to mention falling from the ceiling... :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 25, 2012, 10:17:34 PM
Raptors are smart...they must have strategically placed it up there so as to strike fear in the heart of Ellie Sattler and create tension and fear as she sprints out to regroup with everyone else, thus demoralizing her to the point where they could attack with relative ease.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Dec 25, 2012, 10:20:07 PM
Especially genetically engineered lesbian raptors.

Quote from: First Blood on Dec 25, 2012, 10:13:58 PM
Not to mention falling from the ceiling... :laugh:

A class act, for sure.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Dec 25, 2012, 10:31:27 PM
Jackson's arm deserved an Oscar nom. Not a win, mind you, but a nod.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 25, 2012, 10:32:31 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Dec 25, 2012, 10:31:27 PM
Jackson's arm deserved an Oscar nom. Not a win, mind you, but a nod.

I hear those nominations cost you an arm and a leg to get.

Jackson underpaid...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Dec 26, 2012, 03:31:58 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 25, 2012, 10:32:31 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Dec 25, 2012, 10:31:27 PM
Jackson's arm deserved an Oscar nom. Not a win, mind you, but a nod.

I hear those nominations cost you an arm and a leg to get.

Jackson underpaid...
Clever girl...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Dec 26, 2012, 03:36:53 AM
Quote from: BANE on Dec 26, 2012, 03:31:58 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 25, 2012, 10:32:31 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Dec 25, 2012, 10:31:27 PM
Jackson's arm deserved an Oscar nom. Not a win, mind you, but a nod.

I hear those nominations cost you an arm and a leg to get.

Jackson underpaid...
Clever girl...

You have no idea...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 26, 2012, 04:23:55 PM
I was playing Primal Carnage just now, and I have to wonder. As good as JP is, is its influence on the way we see dinosaurs in pop culture just a bit too pervasive?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 26, 2012, 04:56:21 PM
I think it got hilarious by the time a game dalled Jurassic: The Hunted had a Dilophosaurus with an amazingly wooden crest. Thing is Jurassic Park is continuously looked at as an archetype due to its success and popularity. Ask anyone what a Dilophosaurus is, and a lot of people will answer saying it's the spitting dinosaur from Jurassic Park. A lot of people actually believe the real thing was like that, to the point I saw the Chlamydosaurus labeled as 'a little Dilophosaurus' (when in reality it was the source of inspiration). The series is the reason the knowledge of Dinosaurs is so widespread even among those who are not in the field nor are interested in it. Any person would be able to tell you what a Tyrannosaurus is -- but how much do you bet that most won't answer when you ask them what, say, an Anomalocaris or a Gastornis is? I actually appreciate that the show Primeval (which by itself was influenced by Jurassic Park) tried to put more 'unknown' prehistoric things in its episodes. You see something in the show -- say, the Kaprosuchus. Some are motivated to go look it up.
Point is it does not come as a surprise. Barring the majority of documentaries, virtually any dinosaur-related material made after Jurassic Park has a minimal influence from that film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 26, 2012, 05:15:00 PM
But that to me is a huge problem. For instance, ever heard of the documentary Jurassic Fight Club? Never mind the series' own flaws, but why is it called Jurassic Fight Club? It doesn't only feature dinosaurs of the Jurassic and frankly, I think the title is lousy.

Also, going back to Primal Carnage, as I mentioned earlier; prime example. The T.Rex not only looks almost identical to the JP Rex, but has a roar that is more or less a modified roar of the JP Rex (much like the Rex in Dino Crisis 1 and 2 does). The Velociraptor is a direct copy of the JP raptor, and the Dilo could almost be the same thing, given its size and the fact that it spits venom.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 26, 2012, 07:04:11 PM
Thankfully enough I said 'majority of' when referring to documentaries. I had totally forgot about that. If you can call it a documentary, that is.

Everything you say goes into my argument. Already knew about all of them. Jurassic Park is the archetype, because it is popular. The logic that they use here is that if they imitate that style, there's more of a chance for success. Dinosaurs? Well let's look at Jurassic Park.

I personally don't feel this problem as much as you do, because I have barely played Dino Crisis and that putrid Jurassic The Hunted. The latter even has a Spinosaurus breaking a Tyrannosaurus' neck, go figure.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 27, 2012, 12:06:26 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Dec 26, 2012, 07:04:11 PM
Thankfully enough I said 'majority of' when referring to documentaries. I had totally forgot about that. If you can call it a documentary, that is.

Everything you say goes into my argument. Already knew about all of them. Jurassic Park is the archetype, because it is popular. The logic that they use here is that if they imitate that style, there's more of a chance for success. Dinosaurs? Well let's look at Jurassic Park.

I personally don't feel this problem as much as you do, because I have barely played Dino Crisis and that putrid Jurassic The Hunted. The latter even has a Spinosaurus breaking a Tyrannosaurus' neck, go figure.

Missed it, sorry!
It wasn't that bad. It had some decent info and was a fresh take on dino-docs. Instead of typical "this dinosaur lived during this time period, here's some info" format, it was different. My only two gripes with it are that the CG dinos looked less than stellar in both presentation and design and George Blasing, while I highly applaud his efforts in bringing a newfound level of popularity to paleontology, is not a great host considering the man is self-taught and not a qualified paleontologist like say, Dr. Currie or Dr. Holtz. Not to mention, his theories were a bit too speculative.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 27, 2012, 12:16:11 AM
I remember few things about that thing: I totally rocked the flash player game, the T.Rex design was nice, and the paleontologist parts that were horribly chopped up (to the point where it seemed the editors actually wanted to change the sense of what the scientists were saying), when they were not about wildly speculative theories.

Nothing compared to other monstrosities however. I remember one doc called 'Monsters resurrected' or some such where they said the Spinosaurus was the perfect dinosaur hunter and that it preferred eating other carnivores -- everything supported with a CGI video of a comically oversized Spinosaurus attacking a pack of Carcharodontosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 27, 2012, 12:47:51 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Dec 27, 2012, 12:16:11 AM
I remember few things about that thing: I totally rocked the flash player game, the T.Rex design was nice, and the paleontologist parts that were horribly chopped up (to the point where it seemed the editors actually wanted to change the sense of what the scientists were saying), when they were not about wildly speculative theories.

The Rex design was awful. When did its arms become skinny twigs? Honestly; I could barely see them. And that colour scheme was ugh. As for the editing, I didn't pick up on that. I'll have to rewatch it.

Quote from: OmegaZilla on Dec 27, 2012, 12:16:11 AM
Nothing compared to other monstrosities however. I remember one doc called 'Monsters resurrected' or some such where they said the Spinosaurus was the perfect dinosaur hunter and that it preferred eating other carnivores -- everything supported with a CGI video of a comically oversized Spinosaurus attacking a pack of Carcharodontosaurs.

Yup, that was the one. I didn't see the scene you're referring to but when I saw the Spino quite literally swat a Carcharodontosaurus out of its way and break its neck with one hit, I turned it off.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 27, 2012, 12:54:44 AM
Yes, you're right. I didn't remember the slapping bit at all.  Here's the video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07FzfVcNlTA (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07FzfVcNlTA)
All they needed after the bitchslap was a bloody 'FATALITY' writing on the screen. I mostly referred to the chomping out.

So this calls itself a 'documentary'. ???
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 27, 2012, 12:59:34 AM
Yeah well. That's the reason why there are quite a few dino-docs out there but let's say of the 20 that exist, only three or so are worth watching.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 27, 2012, 01:08:33 AM
I agree. Walking with Dinosaurs had its share of inaccuracies or speculative aspects (25 metres long Liopleurodon to make an example) but on the whole, as I remember it, is an incredibly well made documentary and still the most competent on the field. I also fondly recall some Discovery channel docs, Dinosaur Planet and the likes.

Dinosaur Revolution looked promising, especially on the design aspects, but I was turned off a great deal when I saw the promotional video with a Tyrannosaurus fight in it. One of 'contestants' pooped and stomped on its excrements to prepare the fight -- and I remember a great emphasis on that specific action. ???
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Dec 27, 2012, 01:12:21 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Dec 27, 2012, 01:08:33 AM
I agree. Walking with Dinosaurs had its share of inaccuracies or speculative aspects (25 metres long Liopleurodon to make an example) but on the whole, as I remember it, is an incredibly well made documentary and still the most competent on the field. I also fondly recall some Discovery channel docs, Dinosaur Planet and the likes.

Dinosaur Revolution looked promising, especially on the design aspects, but I was turned off a great deal when I saw the promotional video with a Tyrannosaurus fight in it. One of 'contestants' pooped and stomped on its excrements to prepare the fight -- and I remember a great emphasis on that specific action. ???

Dinosaur Revolution is more of like a movie then a documentary from what I've seen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 27, 2012, 02:06:08 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Dec 27, 2012, 01:08:33 AM
I agree. Walking with Dinosaurs had its share of inaccuracies or speculative aspects (25 metres long Liopleurodon to make an example) but on the whole, as I remember it, is an incredibly well made documentary and still the most competent on the field. I also fondly recall some Discovery channel docs, Dinosaur Planet and the likes.

Dinosaur Revolution looked promising, especially on the design aspects, but I was turned off a great deal when I saw the promotional video with a Tyrannosaurus fight in it. One of 'contestants' pooped and stomped on its excrements to prepare the fight -- and I remember a great emphasis on that specific action. ???

WWD and Planet Dinosaur are the best IMO. DR was OK. There was a bit too much emphasis on personifying the dinosaurs I felt. There were quite a few moments as I recall, especially in episode two with Allosaurus, which almost made it seemed like a comedy film at times.

Even though it's extremely old at this point, back in the 90s, PaleoWorld was excellent. Did you ever see that one?

Quote from: King Rathalos on Dec 27, 2012, 01:12:21 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Dec 27, 2012, 01:08:33 AM
I agree. Walking with Dinosaurs had its share of inaccuracies or speculative aspects (25 metres long Liopleurodon to make an example) but on the whole, as I remember it, is an incredibly well made documentary and still the most competent on the field. I also fondly recall some Discovery channel docs, Dinosaur Planet and the likes.

Dinosaur Revolution looked promising, especially on the design aspects, but I was turned off a great deal when I saw the promotional video with a Tyrannosaurus fight in it. One of 'contestants' pooped and stomped on its excrements to prepare the fight -- and I remember a great emphasis on that specific action. ???

Dinosaur Revolution is more of like a movie then a documentary from what I've seen.

Believe it or not, it was supposed to be a movie originally. Dr. Holtz admitted as such on Facebook.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 27, 2012, 02:14:48 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 27, 2012, 02:06:08 AM
Even though it's extremely old at this point, back in the 90s, PaleoWorld was excellent. Did you ever see that one?
Never heard of it until now, although googling it brought up images like this...
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.filmwest.com%2Fimages%2Fdbimages%2F2075%2Fdino-cover.jpg&hash=44fc6f6493768b80c96d2ad0bb1748e886e3a2bf)
...which were widely used in dinosaur-related publications I used to buy. Oh the memories.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 27, 2012, 04:13:12 AM
It's old-school. The format was interviews with paleontologists, spliced in with images from various artists, Dinamation animatronics, and museum displays, sometimes accompanied by dinosaurian sound effects. The show also had an awesome theme.

Here, check this out:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTvplSG1TcE#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTvplSG1TcE#ws)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmybNmSnDYM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmybNmSnDYM#ws)

Needless to say, this is my favourite episode.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Dec 27, 2012, 05:30:10 AM
Got the blu-ray for christmas!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Dec 27, 2012, 05:00:54 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Dec 25, 2012, 10:13:58 PM
Not to mention falling from the ceiling... :laugh:

It's jammed inbetween some pipes and falls when Ellie backs into it. It doesn't come from the ceiling you sausage.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 27, 2012, 06:38:07 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Dec 27, 2012, 05:00:54 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Dec 25, 2012, 10:13:58 PM
Not to mention falling from the ceiling... :laugh:

It's jammed inbetween some pipes and falls when Ellie backs into it. It doesn't come from the ceiling you sausage.

I've said this to Vulhalla on Facebook and now I'm saying it to you on AvP Galaxy: "Oh, you English and your cussing :D"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 27, 2012, 06:39:52 PM
I actually remember reading a funny fan fic about Ray Arnold's encounter with th the raptor in the shed.  It said something about him grabbing his severed arm and beating the shit out of the raptor with it, in defense.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 27, 2012, 06:44:06 PM
Angry black man was angry.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Jan 09, 2013, 05:38:05 PM
Jurassic Park 3D will play in IMAX for one week.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=72368 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=72368)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 09, 2013, 07:41:10 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcctosiam.files.wordpress.com%2F2012%2F07%2Fcrying-meme-673.jpg&hash=ecc1bb7f4d0e0aac73bc46710848e8e23e6133cb)

Better be on guard for advance tickets...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jan 09, 2013, 08:25:46 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Jan 09, 2013, 05:38:05 PM
Jurassic Park 3D will play in IMAX for one week.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=72368 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=72368)

Oh Christ, I better be ready for that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 09, 2013, 08:31:45 PM
Wait!
Does this mean we get normal 3D for more than one week or that one week is the TOTAL disponible time?
I really hope they get it here, dammit!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 09, 2013, 08:43:41 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fia.media-imdb.com%2Fimages%2FM%2FMV5BMTc2MjM4Nzk4M15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNTA4NTgwMw%40%40._V1._SX640_SY650_.jpg&hash=955305c9e83ab786afa5f40ee69f7e0277a9f391)

"Must find theater that will screen it!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 09, 2013, 09:02:59 PM
I'm going to see if the B.F.I Waterloo (biggest screen in the UK) will screen it :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 10, 2013, 12:07:43 AM
Quote from: Shasvre on Jan 09, 2013, 05:38:05 PM
Jurassic Park 3D will play in IMAX for one week.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=72368 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=72368)

Does that mean we'll see a full scale life size T-Rex on our screens?! That'd be freaking awesome!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 10, 2013, 04:21:23 AM
I can already imagine the Rex scene being the most intense scene I'll see in a movie all year. I become emotional just thinking about it...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 10, 2013, 04:27:05 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 10, 2013, 04:21:23 AM
I can already imagine the Rex scene being the most intense scene I'll see in a movie all year. I become emotional just thinking about it...

HELL YES!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 10, 2013, 04:27:34 AM
Hearing the cables snap, and the thunderous steps, not to mention the roar would shake my body in IMAX. I hope to god my IMAx theater is playing it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 10, 2013, 04:36:35 AM
I remember when I first got the Kenner Red Rex as a kid, I used to pretend the twisty-tie cables that held it in place where the wires from the electrical fence. My Rex would rip them apart while I made the sound effects myself. Oh to be a kid again...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 10, 2013, 04:37:59 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 10, 2013, 04:36:35 AM
I remember when I first got the Kenner Red Rex as a kid, I used to pretend the twisty-tie cables that held it in place where the wires from the electrical fence. My Rex would rip them apart while I made the sound effects myself. Oh to be a kid again...

Haha you were just like me when I was a kid.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 10, 2013, 04:41:41 AM
I used to flip a table upside down and tie rope around the legs to make the fence.  Then I would pretend to be the T Rex (since I had no JP toys  :( )  and I would attack my hotwheels.

My parents really thought I had problems, but I was 5!  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 10, 2013, 04:43:22 AM
No JP toys at all!?!? Buddy, buddy, buddy, you missed out!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 10, 2013, 04:45:41 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 10, 2013, 04:43:22 AM
No JP toys at all!?!? Buddy, buddy, buddy, you missed out!

Oh, but I got some toys later.  I got A LOT of toys 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jan 10, 2013, 04:56:07 AM
Jurassic Park toys were like, the best Dinosaur toys. Ever. I've yet to find any that match them, except maybe the Papo ones. If you count them as toys. Some would consider them models, just for show.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 10, 2013, 05:04:50 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jan 10, 2013, 04:45:41 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 10, 2013, 04:43:22 AM
No JP toys at all!?!? Buddy, buddy, buddy, you missed out!

Oh, but I got some toys later.  I got A LOT of toys 8)

Any pics?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 10, 2013, 09:03:41 AM
The JPark toys were the best toys and the most playable. No other toy franchise was as good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jan 10, 2013, 11:49:28 AM
The really great thing was that the Aliens toys were made in the same scale and style as the Jurassic Park toys, and sold at the same time. If you had friends with a bunch of each, it was a recipe for epicness.

(I was an 8-year-old pervert, Ripley and Muldoon hooked up every time.)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 10, 2013, 02:20:10 PM
Heh, it was quite awesome when the Star Wars characters had to help take down a T-Rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 10, 2013, 02:23:30 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 10, 2013, 02:20:10 PM
Heh, it was quite awesome when the Star Wars characters had to help take down a T-Rex.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm3.staticflickr.com%2F2689%2F4034161166_90a5cbbd0c_z.jpg&hash=77fc03784e73104da3d84efb6a85974b39d12252)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 10, 2013, 03:58:32 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 10, 2013, 05:04:50 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jan 10, 2013, 04:45:41 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 10, 2013, 04:43:22 AM
No JP toys at all!?!? Buddy, buddy, buddy, you missed out!

Oh, but I got some toys later.  I got A LOT of toys 8)

Any pics?

Unfortunately no.  I have them all stored deep in my basement right now.  I may have to *gulps* sell some in the future.  I see that Thrasher T-Rex is pretty rare on ebay.  I may have a shot at some big bucks there.

If only I can bring myself to do it  :-\   :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 10, 2013, 06:18:44 PM
Sell?! WHY!?!?!?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 10, 2013, 06:20:50 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 10, 2013, 06:18:44 PM
Sell?! WHY!?!?!?

The economy, man! 

I'm not making as much money as I once was  :(

I'm still not sure if I'll actually do it though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jan 10, 2013, 07:06:00 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jan 10, 2013, 03:58:32 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 10, 2013, 05:04:50 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jan 10, 2013, 04:45:41 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 10, 2013, 04:43:22 AM
No JP toys at all!?!? Buddy, buddy, buddy, you missed out!

Oh, but I got some toys later.  I got A LOT of toys 8)

Any pics?

Unfortunately no.  I have them all stored deep in my basement right now.  I may have to *gulps* sell some in the future.  I see that Thrasher T-Rex is pretty rare on ebay.  I may have a shot at some big bucks there.

If only I can bring myself to do it  :-\   :'(

Don't bother selling your Thrasher unless you're confident of a sizable (and knowledgable) audience. I sold mine on Ebay last month and only made back something in the region of the RRP.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 10, 2013, 07:46:47 PM
The Thrasher is worth a good penny too, especially if it's complete. I bought mine for $110.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jan 11, 2013, 10:52:32 PM
 Borys Kit ‏@Borys_Kit

This just in: Universal Pictures will release JURASSIC PARK 4 in 3D on June 13, 2014.

Borys Kit ‏@Borys_Kit

Spielberg is only producing JP4. No director on it at this time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Jan 11, 2013, 10:58:18 PM
Oh, nice to have a release date on this. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jan 11, 2013, 11:01:59 PM
Borys Kit ‏@Borys_Kit

Rise of the Planet of Apes Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver delivered a new draft this week. Search for directors to commence next. But... ...could Spielberg return to JP franchise in light of Robopocalypse's postponement?

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 11, 2013, 11:05:01 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Jan 11, 2013, 10:52:32 PM
Borys Kit ‏@Borys_Kit

This just in: Universal Pictures will release JURASSIC PARK 4 in 3D on June 13, 2014.

Borys Kit ‏@Borys_Kit

Spielberg is only producing JP4. No director on it at this time.
Excellent. It is finally happening!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 11, 2013, 11:05:56 PM
PRAISE HIM!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 11, 2013, 11:11:07 PM
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

AISBCIDFSBVDSCSCERG O NCEINFV;;N  ERIGFBGRG3GRN,N IERFVW
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gazz on Jan 11, 2013, 11:24:43 PM
I never thought this film would actually happen. Been rooting for it since the Rise of the Planet of the Apes writers jumped onboard!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jan 11, 2013, 11:33:09 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1lc8GwBKFE# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1lc8GwBKFE#)


Get ready to hear this again on the big screen, guys. I'm shedding man tears.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jan 11, 2013, 11:38:10 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Jan 11, 2013, 10:52:32 PM
Borys Kit ‏@Borys_Kit

This just in: Universal Pictures will release JURASSIC PARK 4 in 3D on June 13, 2014.

Borys Kit ‏@Borys_Kit

Spielberg is only producing JP4. No director on it at this time.

Ho-ly shit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Jan 11, 2013, 11:42:05 PM
Please don't let this one fail O.o






And be at least two hours and have a significant story towards the 1st movie. Maybe a return to isla nublar
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jan 11, 2013, 11:48:22 PM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on Jan 11, 2013, 11:42:05 PM
Please don't let this one fail O.o






And be at least two hours and have a significant story towards the 1st movie. Maybe a return to isla nublar
Lol, Isla Nublar was leveled in both Novel and Film canon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 11, 2013, 11:50:16 PM
Thought this would be interesting to share with you. Not sure if you have heard/seen any of this "Human dinosaur hybrid" concept art that was canned for Jurassic Park 4.

QuoteI'm pleased to report that this second Sayles draft of JURASSIC PARK 4 sees him working in full exploitation mode. I've talked to a number of people about this draft, and it seems to radically divide them in terms of reaction. Some people adore the premise and get excited as soon as they hear it. Some people (including the person who gave it to me) are convinced it's the worst thing they've ever read and a signpost on the road to Hollywood Hell. Personally, I think it's well-written and certainly inventive, but I also think it just might be the single most bugf**k crazy franchise sequel I've ever read, and I'm not sure we're ever going to see this thing onscreen. It just doesn't seem possible that Universal would make something this vigorously whacked out.

I spent the entire first act of the script thinking I had it figured out. I knew where it was going. Problem was, every time I thought I had it figured out, something happened that seemed to change the entire premise of the movie.

The script starts at a Little League game somewhere in America, an idyllic scene that quickly goes bad when pterosaurs attack the kids and their parents. It's a cool scene, and I couldn't help but immediately anticipate what might lay ahead. Dinosaurs in America. All-out warfare on home soil. This should be fun. In a series of television clips, we learn that this is the first attack on North American ground following months of this sort of thing in Central America and Mexico. The UN has created a task force to exterminate the dinosaurs. Awesome, I thought. A bad-ass heavily-armed United Nations task force versus the dinosaurs. Bring it on! But then the script throws its first major curve ball, introducing Nick Harris, an unemployed soldier of fortune. Nick's the lead in the movie. Not Alan Grant. Not Ian Malcolm. Despite all the rumors to the contrary, those characters are not back for this film. Instead, we meet Nick as he watches those same reports on TV that we are. He's approached by an ex-commander of his and offered a meeting about a job. He's warned that the guy he'd be working for is a little bit strange...

... which brings us to John Hammond. It's a great cameo role for Richard Attenborough, and he's said several times that he is looking forward to it. In the script's single wittiest scene, we catch up with the eccentric ex-billionaire who is now the most-sued man in history according to the Guiness Book Of World Records. He's been declared incompetent by his heirs and his company has been taken over by other corporations. Technically, Jurassic Park isn't even his problem anymore, but he still feels responsible for the dinosaurs and the damage they do. Hammond's got a big idea: breed some new dinosaurs that can't reproduce and introduce them into the wild population. A Judas strain that will kill off the dinosaurs within one generation. Easy enough, except the UN has outlawed any breeding of new dinosaurs by anyone and they've prohibited the sale, mining, or possession of amber worldwide. Hammond's got scientists ready and waiting to go, but he needs genetic material to work with. As soon as Hammond mentions where that material might come from, I thought for sure that I was ahead of the script again. Oh, of course! The shaving cream can that Nedry stole. He's going to hire this guy to put together a team of mercenaries, and they're going to spend the whole film on Isla Nublar getting picked off one-by-one while trying to find the samples.

After all, the first three films are all pretty much carbon copies of each other, excuses to turn people loose on the island. I almost set the script down at that point, disappointed that they'd do something so predictable again after all this talk about how they were going to turn things upside down. Page sixteen, and I was sure I knew the rest of the script without even reading it.

But I was wrong... again.

Nick Harris does indeed got to Isla Nublar, but he goes alone. He does indeed track down the shaving cream can that Nedry stole, but that's a mere five pages later. And as soon as he finds it, he's attacked not only by excavaraptors (think trapdoor spiders), but also by security rangers who work for Grendel Corporation, the mysterious Swiss holding company that took over Jurassic Park from Hammond. Seems they want those genetic samples for their own purposes... whatever those may be. Nick has to get off the island, evading his pursuers, human or otherwise. He manages to make it back to the mainland just long enough to hide the shaving cream can before the security team catches up with him and gasses him into unconsciousness.

All of that happens by page 39, at which point I realized I had no idea where this thing was going, and I quit trying to guess. It kept confounding my expectations. It certainly didn't feel like it was just another rehash of the same formula. When Nick wakes up, he's in the tower of a medieval castle in the Alps. Seriously. That's the precise moment when the entire enterprise goes so over-the-top loony that you'll either go along with it for the entire insane ride or reject it roundly as a big bag of ludicrous. Nick is introduced to Adrien Joyce, the major domo henchman of Baron von Drax, CEO of the Grendel Corporation. Joyce isn't a moustache-twirling bad guy bent on torturing Nick into revealing where he hid the shaving cream can. Instead, he offers Nick a job, and in order to explain the job to him, he has to take him on a tour of the entire castle, which turns out to be a fairly sophisticated genetics lab where Grendel Corporation has been breeding some dinosaurs of their own design, cross-breeds that never existed in any era of nature with all sorts of custom modifications.

I want to tread lightly on what happens over the course of the rest of the film on the off chance that Mary Parent or someone at Universal is seriously going to make this thing. There's the eight-year-old-boy side of me that thinks that a DIRTY DOZEN-style mercenary team of hyper-smart dinosaurs in body armor killing drug dealers and rescuing kidnapped children will be impossible to resist. And then there's the side of me that says... WHAT THE f**k ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?! Nick is put in charge of training these five dinosaurs, X1 through X5, and the first thing he does is name them. "Any soldier worth his pay has a name to answer to, not a number," he says. So we are introduced to Achilles, Hector, Perseus, Orestes, and Spartacus, each of them a specially created deinonychus, which is sort of like a miniature T-rex. They have super-sensitive smell and hearing, incredible strength and speed and pack-hunting instincts, and they have modified forelegs, lengthened and topped with more dextrous fingers, as well as dog DNA for increased obedience and human DNA so they can solve problems well. All of this is topped off with a drug-regulating implant that can dose them with adrenaline or serotonin as the situation demands.

And go ahead. Look at the calendar. We're a long, long way from April 1st right now.

By the end of the film, there are set pieces that are much, much bigger than anything we've seen in the other films, and much crazier. They're all well-written, and there's a glee to the bloodletting that you have to admire. There's also a blatant set-up for a JURASSIC PARK 5 that is just too good for the studio to pass up. That is, of course, if they actually decide to make this one.

In the end, this represents an enormous gamble for Universal and Amblin', and I admire them for at least exploring this as a possibility. They've thrown some damn good writers at it so far. If they make it, it's anyone's guess how fans of the series so far are going to react. This is no-holds-barred SF/horror/action with none of the staring-up-at-a-special-effect-in-awe tone of the first three films. This is a drive-in movie, slightly unhinged from page one, with some truly hissable human villains and some outrageous monster characters. Will it work? Will we ever see it onscreen to find out?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FwsNsA.png&hash=ba6a0ae8b79b2c873ba17a66d1f0d4b56814dfed)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FSmc97.png&hash=5a85b439814174897cffb807f76708218f0d8d72)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FZAW8G.png&hash=963c9b1983fae34a1defe025ef319ea223bfc2df)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FJ0Oij.png&hash=1b1bb879a8b013d3020a92c406fe7655b9e93f63)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FoJgLe.png&hash=4bf1ef7c336a9c6165b6c1620ad3f3bf3dc4cebb)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F3JIMP.png&hash=026b6cc7028d8d72c198827c3a5fd832ddcbe19c)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FhzVgr.png&hash=7f37e23a28573d606d678b2f6a7baee48ea18c13)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FOjGz3.png&hash=82fa9add598966035dd0a4b1eab7ad4e4e06e431)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FxMOgo.jpg&hash=5ab712128c775c4886ae6e196dd0ec6c7f2640f5)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Ff6PbQ.png&hash=254ef7595e2fa67e87e4699fc603aaa7facd4a0c)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F93Yyl.png&hash=424b9de1291e507debcb749c59d71c1851110cc5)

Here's more on the story:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/filmblog/2012/oct/12/jurassic-park-iv-half-human (http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/filmblog/2012/oct/12/jurassic-park-iv-half-human)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ShadowPred on Jan 12, 2013, 12:00:16 AM
Take all of that...and turn it into a live action EXTREME DINOSAURS movie.


You're welcome everyone.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Jan 12, 2013, 12:01:02 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jan 11, 2013, 11:48:22 PM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on Jan 11, 2013, 11:42:05 PM
Please don't let this one fail O.o






And be at least two hours and have a significant story towards the 1st movie. Maybe a return to isla nublar
Lol, Isla Nublar was leveled in both Novel and Film canon.

Yeah, but you never know what kind of story they can think around it.

Edit (Ill place spoiler tags in case someone didnt read, and still wants to read, the novel)
Quote
Spoiler
The end of the original Jurassic Park novel is very different from the movie. In the movie, Ian Malcolm survives the injuries caused by the T. rex and gets on the Helicopter along with the rest of the survivors. In the novel, he dies due to excessive blood loss (at least it seems, he is revealed to have survived in The Lost World), and John Hammond is attacked (and killed) by Procompsognathids while trying to reach the coast of the island to get to the helicopter.
As Dr. Grant, Ellie Sattler, Tim and Lex reach the Costa Rican helicopter, they are met by Velociraptors, but the sound of the nearing helicopter scares them off. Once the remaining survivors board the helicopter, a Costa Rican military officer questions them about what happened on the island. After they finish their stories, the Coast Guard figures it too dangerous, and they fire 12.7 gallons of napalm all over Isla Nublar, destroying Jurassic Park and setting fire to the jungle, at which point Lex begins to cry. As they fly away from the island, a dying T. rex roars in terrifying pain and agony, which makes Lex even more upset.
[close]

The bombing is not mentioned in the films, although a deleted scene from The Lost World: Jurassic Park showed Peter Ludlow stating that all biological life had been eliminated on Isla Nublar. Steven Spielberg decided not to include this in the interest of creating future films that could take place on Isla Nublar.

Also:

QuoteIn the ending of Jurassic Park game, it can be argued that bombing was intervened and prevented by the U.S. military to do an experimental base on Isla Nublar in the comic series since the bombing is not seen. This only for fans who don't count the meeting scene in The Lost World: Jurassic Park.

Source: http://jurassicpark.wikia.com (http://jurassicpark.wikia.com)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 12, 2013, 12:09:05 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Jan 11, 2013, 10:52:32 PM
Borys Kit ‏@Borys_Kit

This just in: Universal Pictures will release JURASSIC PARK 4 in 3D on June 13, 2014.

Borys Kit ‏@Borys_Kit

Spielberg is only producing JP4. No director on it at this time.

Whoa...that is way sooner than I would have expected.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jan 12, 2013, 12:12:29 AM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on Jan 12, 2013, 12:01:02 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jan 11, 2013, 11:48:22 PM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on Jan 11, 2013, 11:42:05 PM
Please don't let this one fail O.o






And be at least two hours and have a significant story towards the 1st movie. Maybe a return to isla nublar
Lol, Isla Nublar was leveled in both Novel and Film canon.

Yeah, but you never know what kind of story they can think around it.

Edit (Ill place spoiler tags in case someone didnt read, and still wants to read, the novel)
Quote
Spoiler
The end of the original Jurassic Park novel is very different from the movie. In the movie, Ian Malcolm survives the injuries caused by the T. rex and gets on the Helicopter along with the rest of the survivors. In the novel, he dies due to excessive blood loss (at least it seems, he is revealed to have survived in The Lost World), and John Hammond is attacked (and killed) by Procompsognathids while trying to reach the coast of the island to get to the helicopter.
As Dr. Grant, Ellie Sattler, Tim and Lex reach the Costa Rican helicopter, they are met by Velociraptors, but the sound of the nearing helicopter scares them off. Once the remaining survivors board the helicopter, a Costa Rican military officer questions them about what happened on the island. After they finish their stories, the Coast Guard figures it too dangerous, and they fire 12.7 gallons of napalm all over Isla Nublar, destroying Jurassic Park and setting fire to the jungle, at which point Lex begins to cry. As they fly away from the island, a dying T. rex roars in terrifying pain and agony, which makes Lex even more upset.
[close]

The bombing is not mentioned in the films, although a deleted scene from The Lost World: Jurassic Park showed Peter Ludlow stating that all biological life had been eliminated on Isla Nublar. Steven Spielberg decided not to include this in the interest of creating future films that could take place on Isla Nublar.

Also:

QuoteIn the ending of Jurassic Park game, it can be argued that bombing was intervened and prevented by the U.S. military to do an experimental base on Isla Nublar in the comic series since the bombing is not seen. This only for fans who don't count the meeting scene in The Lost World: Jurassic Park.

Source: http://jurassicpark.wikia.com (http://jurassicpark.wikia.com)

Jurassic Park: The Game has been confirmed to be film canon, so the napalm strike happened.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 12, 2013, 12:48:21 AM
Words cannot express how happy and excited I am right now. Only Omega's post comes close.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jan 12, 2013, 01:01:58 AM
Jura$$ic Park IV: Straight to the Dollar Theater Matinee
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jan 12, 2013, 01:03:26 AM
I just-- I can't be excited until I hear the premise.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 12, 2013, 01:05:26 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Jan 12, 2013, 01:03:26 AM
I just-- I can't be excited until I hear the premise.

Byosin up this bitch, pl0x. Also Nublar return.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jan 12, 2013, 01:13:55 AM
Both of those things are all I want.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ShadowPred on Jan 12, 2013, 01:15:52 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Jan 12, 2013, 01:03:26 AM
I just-- I can't be excited until I hear the premise.


Same here, I want to be excited as much as everyone else...but I can't right now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 12, 2013, 01:22:20 AM
Biosyn was InGen's rival in the book, right? Were they ever referred to by name in the first film?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jan 12, 2013, 01:54:01 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 12, 2013, 01:22:20 AM
Biosyn was InGen's rival in the book, right? Were they ever referred to by name in the first film?

I believe so, but not enough for it to be considered a plot point. It was more like a plot point in a plot point. I believe, like the book, Dodgson was working for Biosyn when he gave Nedry the Canister for the embryos. I haven't seen the movie in a while, though, so I'm not entirely certain on this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jan 12, 2013, 01:56:19 AM
I saw Lost World and 3 on the big screen :) Was too young to see the first flick in theaters but i'll be watching the 3d re-release this summer...

Cant wait for this :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jan 12, 2013, 02:05:14 AM
^Same here. Jurassic Park 4 comes out the same summer as Godzilla, The Amazing Spider-Man 2, The Hobbit 3, Rise of Planet of the Apes, Transformers 4, X-Men First Class 2 and Guardians of the Galaxy. 2014 is going to be a year for the fan boys.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Jan 12, 2013, 02:05:20 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 12, 2013, 01:01:58 AM
Jura$$ic Park IV: Straight to the Dollar Theater Matinee
Shut up. Dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jan 12, 2013, 02:12:37 AM
Hopefully: Carnotaurus up in this madafaka.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jan 12, 2013, 02:15:04 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Jan 12, 2013, 02:12:37 AM
Hopefully: Carnotaurus up in this madafaka.

So much this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jan 12, 2013, 02:26:15 AM
like all of you.. i'm wondering about the plot.... what could it possibly be that doesnt sound like a retread of what's been done before in the franchise?

At least the Dino's with guns script idea seemed hella fun, different and carried the entire franchise into new B-Movie fun directions :laugh:

maybe a Mosassaurus or Pliosaurus escaped from underwater pens on one of the islands... and are wrecking havoc near Costa Rica... and someone has to intervene... that would be different enough from the other movies... "Jaws" with swimming reptiles and bigger teeth. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 12, 2013, 03:13:16 AM
Quote from: ShadowPred on Jan 12, 2013, 01:15:52 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Jan 12, 2013, 01:03:26 AM
I just-- I can't be excited until I hear the premise.


Same here, I want to be excited as much as everyone else...but I can't right now.
Same as well. It's awesome that a fourth movie is being made, I just have to keep skepticism on how good it will be until I hear plot synopsis. We don't want this to turn out like Indy 4.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 12, 2013, 03:15:51 AM
Or in my case, I'd really enjoy it if it turned out like Indy 4. A fun film and a worthy successor to the originals, despite not necessarily being as good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 12, 2013, 03:21:08 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 12, 2013, 03:15:51 AM
Or in my case, I'd really enjoy it if it turned out like Indy 4. A fun film and a worthy successor to the originals, despite not necessarily being as good.
Exactly. I do too.

It's ridiculous how some fans overreact towards that film when it was a decent sequel to the franchise.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 12, 2013, 03:53:03 AM
JURASSIC PARK IV IS GOING TO RAPE ALL COMPETITION IN 2014.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 12, 2013, 04:01:54 AM
JJ Abrams should direct!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jan 12, 2013, 04:02:27 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Jan 12, 2013, 01:03:26 AM
I just-- I can't be excited until I hear the premise.

Same here. I hope they start filming and casting soon. I never thought to see the 4th movie out soon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jan 12, 2013, 04:04:40 AM
erhm.. bring back Joe Johnston. 3 wasnt as good as the other films.. .. but directing wasnt amongst it's many problems.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 12, 2013, 07:14:49 AM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Jan 12, 2013, 01:54:01 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 12, 2013, 01:22:20 AM
Biosyn was InGen's rival in the book, right? Were they ever referred to by name in the first film?

I believe so, but not enough for it to be considered a plot point. It was more like a plot point in a plot point. I believe, like the book, Dodgson was working for Biosyn when he gave Nedry the Canister for the embryos. I haven't seen the movie in a while, though, so I'm not entirely certain on this.

There was no real explanation though in the film as to why Nedry went rogue. All we get is "Don't get cheap on me Dodgson. That was Hammond's mistake" which doesn't tell us anything really. The book did a superb job of explaining it, as you might expect.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 12, 2013, 07:16:20 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 12, 2013, 07:14:49 AM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Jan 12, 2013, 01:54:01 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 12, 2013, 01:22:20 AM
Biosyn was InGen's rival in the book, right? Were they ever referred to by name in the first film?

I believe so, but not enough for it to be considered a plot point. It was more like a plot point in a plot point. I believe, like the book, Dodgson was working for Biosyn when he gave Nedry the Canister for the embryos. I haven't seen the movie in a while, though, so I'm not entirely certain on this.

There was no real explanation though in the film as to why Nedry went rogue. All we get is "Don't get cheap on me Dodgson. That was Hammond's mistake" which doesn't tell us anything really. The book did a superb job of explaining it, as you might expect.

It helps that Hammond was a huge asshole in the book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jan 12, 2013, 08:02:52 AM
I have a feeling that JP4 will end up being the Men in Black 3 of the franchise. I think it will likely end up being surprise hit and better then what people will be expecting.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 12, 2013, 08:06:14 AM
Hopefully it won't screw with the backstory like MIB 3 did.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master on Jan 12, 2013, 09:43:50 AM
I personaly would like to see another island from archipelago inhabited with dinos. Like Isla Muerta.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 12, 2013, 10:59:19 AM
Next year is going to be beautiful. Godzilla and Jurassic Park 4! I just hope they make it as they did the others, and not do a Hobbit trying to have 3D gags left, right and centre.

Ahem, oh and remember to use Stan Winstons dinosaurs unless it's a full body shot, or the animal is running.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 12, 2013, 11:03:03 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Jan 12, 2013, 03:21:08 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 12, 2013, 03:15:51 AM
Or in my case, I'd really enjoy it if it turned out like Indy 4. A fun film and a worthy successor to the originals, despite not necessarily being as good.
Exactly. I do too.

It's ridiculous how some fans overreact towards that film when it was a decent sequel to the franchise.

mein negers
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 12, 2013, 01:25:15 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Jan 12, 2013, 02:12:37 AM
Hopefully: Carnotaurus up in this madafaka.
ALL

OF MY

YES.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Jan 12, 2013, 02:05:47 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Jan 12, 2013, 04:01:54 AM
JJ Abrams should direct!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5RtlpXsl8k# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5RtlpXsl8k#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 12, 2013, 03:24:47 PM
What's wrong with having JJ direct? He's made great movies.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 12, 2013, 03:34:36 PM
Super 8 was great, and showed that he is great at channeling Spielberg's older films while still retaining a style f his own.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 12, 2013, 03:35:04 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 12, 2013, 03:34:36 PM
Super 8 was great, and showed that he is great at channeling Spielberg's older films while still retaining a style f his own.
All of my yes.

It reeeeally depends on the script.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 12, 2013, 03:38:49 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 12, 2013, 03:34:36 PM
Super 8 was great, and showed that he is great at channeling Spielberg's older films while still retaining a style f his own.
Agreed. Watching that film in theaters felt like I was transported back in time to the 1970's/1980's. It captured so much emotion out of me in the end and was amazing film to experience.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Jan 12, 2013, 03:43:29 PM
I'm not bothered really, was just testing a use for one of my many videos.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jan 12, 2013, 03:46:26 PM
Quote from: ScardyFox on Jan 12, 2013, 03:43:29 PM
I'm not bothered really, was just testing a use for one of my many videos.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiIBQRu8fTQ#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiIBQRu8fTQ#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Jan 12, 2013, 04:04:48 PM
Hopefully this will concentrate on a smaller cast like the first and third films, and not another huge clusterf**k of astrotards like in Lost World.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 12, 2013, 04:06:58 PM
They have 16 months to find a director, write a story, cast actors, and film. Hopefully they won't rush the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 12, 2013, 04:09:05 PM
Quote from: TJ Doc on Jan 12, 2013, 04:04:48 PM
Hopefully this will concentrate on a smaller cast like the first and third films, and not another huge clusterf**k of astrotards like in Lost World.

I'm just hoping for a more scientific reason to be on the island, rather than searching for someone who is lost.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Jan 12, 2013, 04:15:28 PM
Eh, only if doesn't feature another boring Prometheus-esque science squad.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 12, 2013, 04:44:46 PM
Jurassic Park 4 won't be as classic as the original but hopefully it'll be as good as The Lost World.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 12, 2013, 04:45:03 PM
For this fourth film, I want to see BioSyn take a more active role while inGen tries to finally and wholly section off the island, furthering Hammond's efforts based on his final words in TLW. I think it would create a nice bit of human-driven action while the dinosaurs really take a backseat to the action. I say this with confidence because I honestly believe that Jurassic Park was never about the dinosaurs themselves but more about humanity's perceived ability to control something and step out of his realm and into something more divine by creating life.

As for the dinosaurs, I would like to see a fully-grown Dilophosaurus, a Carnotaurus as well, fewer Velociraptors (the less the better IMO), return of the T.Rex, and a segment with some herbivore action.

Quote from: TJ Doc on Jan 12, 2013, 04:04:48 PM
Hopefully this will concentrate on a smaller cast like the first and third films, and not another huge clusterf**k of astrotards like in Lost World.

:D :D :D you made my day

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 12, 2013, 04:56:04 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 12, 2013, 04:45:03 PM
For this fourth film, I want to see BioSyn take a more active role while inGen tries to finally and wholly section off the island, furthering Hammond's efforts based on his final words in TLW. I think it would create a nice bit of human-driven action while the dinosaurs really take a backseat to the action. I say this with confidence because I honestly believe that Jurassic Park was never about the dinosaurs themselves but more about humanity's perceived ability to control something and step out of his realm and into something more divine by creating life.

As for the dinosaurs, I would like to see a fully-grown Dilophosaurus, a Carnotaurus as well, fewer Velociraptors (the less the better IMO), return of the T.Rex, and a segment with some herbivore action.

Quote from: TJ Doc on Jan 12, 2013, 04:04:48 PM
Hopefully this will concentrate on a smaller cast like the first and third films, and not another huge clusterf**k of astrotards like in Lost World.

:D :D :D you made my day

Seriously man if that's what you want read my script! (Take into account it was written a while back.)

http://www.fileden.com/files/2007/7/10/1255595/Jurassic%20Park%204%20Screenplay.pdf (http://www.fileden.com/files/2007/7/10/1255595/Jurassic%20Park%204%20Screenplay.pdf)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 12, 2013, 05:08:50 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 12, 2013, 04:44:46 PM
Jurassic Park 4 won't be as classic as the original but hopefully it'll be as good as The Lost World.

This. Terribly underrated sequel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 12, 2013, 05:19:32 PM
TLW is not underrated. It receives the right amount of attention/credit. It's a fun movie but in terms of overall quality, it can't match the first film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Jan 12, 2013, 05:20:56 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 12, 2013, 05:19:32 PM
TLW is not underrated. It receives the right amount of attention/credit. It's a fun movie but in terms of overall quality, it can't match the first film.

Honestly, I don't think it's possible to match the first film regardless.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 12, 2013, 05:31:55 PM
There needs to be less emphasis on action and more on story and character development. As I said, the focus initially was never on the dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 12, 2013, 05:34:48 PM
Unfortunately, Koepp decided to take a mine year old's advice and "get to the dinosaurs quicker."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jan 12, 2013, 06:04:04 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 12, 2013, 05:31:55 PM
There needs to be less emphasis on action and more on story and character development. As I said, the focus initially was never on the dinosaurs.

Yeah, I think it's most important that there's something deeper going on than an action movie with dinosaurs. Jurassic Park, in both finely-shaved wood and emulsified sheet plastic forms, worked so brilliantly because it's bringing up novel and thought-provoking issues by means of cutting-edge theory (and not just in terms of the latest dinosaur discoveries, though that itself has been fascinating over the last few decades). I think it's important there are some deeper concepts at work in the new film, and that they're positioned as a driving force.

:edit: I have to say though, I'm not convinced Hollywood is capable of producing such a film anymore. Until more info comes up, I'll be more looking forward to JP's cinema re-release.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jan 12, 2013, 06:06:18 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jan 12, 2013, 05:08:50 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 12, 2013, 04:44:46 PM
Jurassic Park 4 won't be as classic as the original but hopefully it'll be as good as The Lost World.

This. Terribly underrated sequel.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2h8rH8zxA64#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2h8rH8zxA64#ws)

Greatest Scene in Cinema History
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 12, 2013, 06:40:10 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jan 12, 2013, 06:04:04 PM
:edit: I have to say though, I'm not convinced Hollywood is capable of producing such a film anymore. Until more info comes up, I'll be more looking forward to JP's cinema re-release.

Oh they can. They just have to want to is all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 12, 2013, 06:48:27 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 12, 2013, 05:19:32 PM
TLW is not underrated. It receives the right amount of attention/credit. It's a fun movie but in terms of overall quality, it can't match the first film.
Well, duh. Captain Obvious... :P

Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 12, 2013, 06:06:18 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jan 12, 2013, 05:08:50 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 12, 2013, 04:44:46 PM
Jurassic Park 4 won't be as classic as the original but hopefully it'll be as good as The Lost World.

This. Terribly underrated sequel.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2h8rH8zxA64#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2h8rH8zxA64#ws)

Greatest Scene in Cinema History
I think nobody can deny that's the low point of the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Jan 12, 2013, 06:49:47 PM
in b4 ALAN
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jan 12, 2013, 06:51:58 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jan 12, 2013, 06:48:27 PM
I think nobody can deny that's the low point of the movie.
In a film that's filled with them. It's basically Prometheus in the jungle.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 12, 2013, 06:53:22 PM
No, TLW was much more engaging than Prometheus. Prometheus is very much a thinking man's movie. TLW is closer to somewhat intelligent, but still mindless fun.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 12, 2013, 07:00:50 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 12, 2013, 06:53:22 PM
No, TLW was much more engaging than Prometheus. Prometheus is very much a thinking man's movie. TLW is closer to somewhat intelligent, but still mindless fun.

This. Aside from the scene Cvalda posted and not getting a logic explanation about how the boat's crew died, TLW's script and editing are way more solid than Prometheus'.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jan 12, 2013, 07:04:28 PM
I really want to see the Dx virus explored.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 12, 2013, 07:07:51 PM
I liked how they included elements from the first book in Jurassic Park III.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jan 12, 2013, 07:40:43 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 12, 2013, 06:53:22 PM
Prometheus is very much a thinking man's movie.
Is this thinking man in a coma?

Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jan 12, 2013, 07:00:50 PM
Aside from the scene Cvalda posted and not getting a logic explanation about how the boat's crew died, TLW's script and editing are way more solid than Prometheus'.
--Hey, let's set up our base camp on the EDGE OF A CLIFF. What could happen, right?!
--Hey, I think I'm gonna go wander off into the dinosaur-infested woods, and only tell the guy wearing headphones and not bother to make sure he heard me.
--Oh wow, a triceratops just launched a flaming TRUCK so far into the air that it flies halfway across the island and just happens to come crashing down almost on top of two characters.

The movie is dumb as f**k.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jan 12, 2013, 07:44:07 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 12, 2013, 07:40:43 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 12, 2013, 06:53:22 PM
Prometheus is very much a thinking man's movie.
Is this thinking man in a coma?

Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jan 12, 2013, 07:00:50 PM
Aside from the scene Cvalda posted and not getting a logic explanation about how the boat's crew died, TLW's script and editing are way more solid than Prometheus'.
--Hey, let's set up our base camp on the EDGE OF A CLIFF. What could happen, right?!
--Hey, I think I'm gonna go wander off into the dinosaur-infested woods, and only tell the guy wearing headphones and not bother to make sure he heard me.
--Oh wow, a triceratops just launched a flaming TRUCK so far into the air that it flies halfway across the island and just happens to come crashing down almost on top of two characters.

The movie is dumb as f**k.
Colonel Custer wasn't very smart either.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jan 12, 2013, 07:47:10 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSLlZh9yelk#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSLlZh9yelk#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 12, 2013, 07:48:16 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Jan 12, 2013, 07:47:10 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSLlZh9yelk#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSLlZh9yelk#ws)
Yup yup.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 12, 2013, 08:01:21 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 12, 2013, 07:40:43 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 12, 2013, 06:53:22 PM
Prometheus is very much a thinking man's movie.
Is this thinking man in a coma?

Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jan 12, 2013, 07:00:50 PM
Aside from the scene Cvalda posted and not getting a logic explanation about how the boat's crew died, TLW's script and editing are way more solid than Prometheus'.
--Hey, let's set up our base camp on the EDGE OF A CLIFF. What could happen, right?!
--Hey, I think I'm gonna go wander off into the dinosaur-infested woods, and only tell the guy wearing headphones and not bother to make sure he heard me.
--Oh wow, a triceratops just launched a flaming TRUCK so far into the air that it flies halfway across the island and just happens to come crashing down almost on top of two characters.

The movie is dumb as f**k.

That's the only problematic dumb point in your post. The rest is your average blockbuster stuff. Shit dumber than that happens IRL quite often, so I don't what the fuss is all about. Have you ever read/watched the news?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jan 12, 2013, 08:13:56 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.holycow.com%2Fpics%2Fhouse_ohsnap.gif&hash=c3166c4615f8250e11410fba0144fd032a5bc43e)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jan 12, 2013, 08:15:56 PM
No fighting folks. No fighting.

Lost World was dumb as hell and yet also incredibly awesome. The original JP also has stupid and unlikely stuff.....

girl kicking velociraptor with acrobatics > JP's version of jumping the shark...
only outdone in the 3rd film when a Spinosaurus shat out a cellphone.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jan 12, 2013, 08:59:59 PM
The cliff thing was a lot less stupid in the book. They were there to study the creatures, and the cliff was in the middle of the island with a great view of the entire valley, where they could easily see the sauropods and stuff.


How the hell would they know Tyrannosaurs are apparently vengeful to kidnappings? How could anyone know this?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 12, 2013, 09:11:16 PM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Jan 12, 2013, 08:59:59 PM
The cliff thing was a lot less stupid in the book. They were there to study the creatures, and the cliff was in the middle of the island with a great view of the entire valley, where they could easily see the sauropods and stuff.


How the hell would they know Tyrannosaurs are apparently vengeful to kidnappings? How could anyone know this?

Well, Ian was against bringing the little rex to the camp. He was (obviously) the smartest person in the island. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jan 12, 2013, 09:16:51 PM
Well, he was also the only person who was there in the first movie.
He saw this:
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.badhaven.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F11%2Fjurassicpark.jpg&hash=9c7d28dea8fde1dd2a92683760085ad8f3799949)

No one else did.

So why they didn't LISTEN to him is beyond me. Though I guess maybe it was a good idea to help the baby.

I mean, YOLO, right?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jan 12, 2013, 09:24:36 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jan 12, 2013, 08:01:21 PM
Shit dumber than that happens IRL quite often, so I don't what the fuss is all about. Have you ever read/watched the news?
So you want dumb shit in your movies? That's what you look for in your entertainment?

The "stupid shit happens in real life too!" argument is basically just the "God works in mysterious ways" cop-out applied to movies. Lame.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Jan 12, 2013, 09:26:43 PM
I'll always love the Lost World, faults and all. Jurassic Park III on the other hand can go jump off a f**king cliff.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Jan 12, 2013, 10:12:50 PM
You cruel man.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 12, 2013, 10:32:27 PM
Hey, that Spinosaurus vs. T-Rex was badass and them pterodactyls were awesome!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 12, 2013, 10:44:42 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 12, 2013, 09:24:36 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jan 12, 2013, 08:01:21 PM
Shit dumber than that happens IRL quite often, so I don't what the fuss is all about. Have you ever read/watched the news?
So you want dumb shit in your movies? That's what you look for in your entertainment?

The "stupid shit happens in real life too!" argument is basically just the "God works in mysterious ways" cop-out applied to movies. Lame.

Of course not.

I just think what I said it's applicable in this case. Dunno, I can deal with TLW's stupid shit (which I think isn't that stupid anyway) aside from the points I mentioned earlier. :P

I can deal with you hating the living hell out of it, just accept many of us can get over those points and enjoy the movie. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 12, 2013, 10:45:38 PM
Camping on the cliff edge is not stupid. We're told the carnivores are situated in the centre of the island. Ian tried to warn them bringing the infant would bring the adult tyrannosaurs out of their territory and to the cliff edge. Nick and Sarah's blind anger and passion to save the infants life was their undoing.

Concerning the flying jeep. The Rex nest is about 100 metres from the camp. The Ingen camp is down wind so the adult Tyrannosaurs won't smell them. Also its enclosed by a wall of rock. (This is what I've gather so far.)

Dieter Stark needed a shit so bad he didn't notice Carter was listening to music.

TLW's only really stupid scene is the gymnastic scene. Other than that it's a great sequel.

Everyone loves the original despite its stupid moments. Tim not helping Ellie grab the shotgun for example.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jan 12, 2013, 10:50:49 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 12, 2013, 10:45:38 PM
Camping on the cliff edge is not stupid.
In no conceivable scenario would camping on the edge of a perilously steep cliff EVER not be stupid.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 12, 2013, 10:45:38 PM
Dieter Stark needed a shit so bad he didn't notice Carter was listening to music.
LOL.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 12, 2013, 10:45:38 PM
TLW's only really stupid scene is the gymnastic scene. Other than that it's a great sequel.
Not even the boat with a magically killed crew crashing into the dock with no explanation ever given?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ShadowPred on Jan 12, 2013, 10:51:22 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Jan 12, 2013, 09:26:43 PM
I'll always love the Lost World, faults and all. Jurassic Park III on the other hand can go jump off a f**king cliff.

Damn right.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jan 12, 2013, 10:52:59 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 12, 2013, 10:50:49 PM
Not even the boat with a magically killed crew crashing into the dock with no explanation ever given?

Because... T-Rex is the new Dracula. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jan 12, 2013, 10:53:04 PM
Quote from: ShadowPred on Jan 12, 2013, 10:51:22 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Jan 12, 2013, 09:26:43 PM
I'll always love the Lost World, faults and all. Jurassic Park III on the other hand can go jump off a f**king cliff.

Damn right.
My fellow african american friends.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Jan 12, 2013, 10:54:01 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Jan 12, 2013, 10:32:27 PM
Hey, that Spinosaurus vs. T-Rex was badass and them pterodactyls were awesome!

Yep, it's got some great set-pieces. William H. Macy and Tea Leoni were another bonus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 12, 2013, 11:01:07 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 12, 2013, 10:50:49 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 12, 2013, 10:45:38 PM
Camping on the cliff edge is not stupid.
In no conceivable scenario would camping on the edge of a perilously steep cliff EVER not be stupid.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 12, 2013, 10:45:38 PM
Dieter Stark needed a shit so bad he didn't notice Carter was listening to music.
LOL.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 12, 2013, 10:45:38 PM
TLW's only really stupid scene is the gymnastic scene. Other than that it's a great sequel.
Not even the boat with a magically killed crew crashing into the dock with no explanation ever given?

The Tyrannosaurus woke up and ate the crew and was in the cargo hold at the time a dying man pressed the button to seal it in there. The hand on the wheel is really the only mystery because the bridge looks intacted, however we do see one side of the bridge. The T-Rex could have smashed it's head through the wall.

I'm currently watching a nature documentary and the crew are filming Polar bears from fifty metres away saying "if she charges we're dead." camping on a cliff top not so unlikely. Also remember the Tyrannosaurs had to push it there, it wasn't like they had driven the trailer over the cliff.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jan 12, 2013, 11:02:31 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 12, 2013, 11:01:07 PM
The Tyrannosaurus woke up and ate the crew and was in the cargo hold at the time a dying man pressed the button to seal it in there. The hand on the wheel is really the only mystery because the bridge looks intacted, however we do see one side of the bridge. The T-Rex could have smashed it's head through the wall.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.alan.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F01%2Fjones_alex.jpg&hash=737c5a0274f6aacb1d6c1d8c0c004c10876ecf2c)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 12, 2013, 11:05:52 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 12, 2013, 11:02:31 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 12, 2013, 11:01:07 PM
The Tyrannosaurus woke up and ate the crew and was in the cargo hold at the time a dying man pressed the button to seal it in there. The hand on the wheel is really the only mystery because the bridge looks intacted, however we do see one side of the bridge. The T-Rex could have smashed it's head through the wall.
http://www.alan.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/jones_alex.jpg

You now understand. ;) sorry meant you don't see one side of the bridge. Typing on my phone sorry.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Jan 12, 2013, 11:06:17 PM
Actually, Velociraptors ate the crew, but they cut that from the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jan 12, 2013, 11:07:10 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Jan 12, 2013, 11:06:17 PM
Actually, Velociraptors ate the crew, but they cut that from the movie.
...and then jumped overboard, I guess :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 12, 2013, 11:10:10 PM
I've never understood the confusion surrounding the boat. It's all spelt out on screen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Jan 12, 2013, 11:12:01 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 12, 2013, 11:07:10 PM...and then jumped overboard, I guess :laugh:

There was supposed to be a scene of a raptor sneaking off the ship after it crashed into the harbour, but they cut that as well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 12, 2013, 11:12:59 PM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Jan 12, 2013, 08:59:59 PM
How the hell would they know Tyrannosaurs are apparently vengeful to kidnappings? How could anyone know this?

It was a territory thing. Since their kid was kidnapped, they felt they had to expand their territory. Burke says as much after Ian and friends are rescued.

Quote from: TJ Doc on Jan 12, 2013, 10:54:01 PM
William H. Macy and Tea Leoni were another bonus.

Their dialogue was cringe-worthy. What the hell is this, marriage counseling on an island with dinosaurs? Pfft.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 12, 2013, 10:45:38 PMDieter Stark needed a shit so bad he didn't notice Carter was listening to music.

Actually he needed to pee ;)

Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 12, 2013, 10:45:38 PMEveryone loves the original despite its stupid moments. Tim not helping Ellie grab the shotgun for example.

Or Lex turning on the flashlight because apparently, being a 40 ft long, 18 ft tall carnivore doesn't make you visible enough when you're only what, 20 feet away from whatever is looking at you?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jan 12, 2013, 11:16:14 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Jan 12, 2013, 11:06:17 PM
Actually, Velociraptors ate the crew, but they cut that from the movie.

That would have made more sense and added more tension to the films climax... Why Spielberg.. why :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 12, 2013, 11:18:31 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Jan 12, 2013, 11:16:14 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Jan 12, 2013, 11:06:17 PM
Actually, Velociraptors ate the crew, but they cut that from the movie.

That would have made more sense and added more tension to the films climax... Why Spielberg.. why :P

Because the T-Rex is cooler. Yes Spielberg...Yes!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Jan 12, 2013, 11:20:50 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 12, 2013, 11:12:59 PM
Quote from: TJ Doc on Jan 12, 2013, 10:54:01 PM
William H. Macy and Tea Leoni were another bonus.

Their dialogue was cringe-worthy. What the hell is this, marriage counseling on an island with dinosaurs? Pfft.

Their marital issues weren't a major plot point, and they had good chemistry.

It was fine.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jan 12, 2013, 11:22:36 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 12, 2013, 11:18:31 PM
Because the T-Rex is cooler. Yes Spielberg...Yes!
Yes! Having the T-Rex single-handedly and mysteriously take out everyone on the boat is cooler... therefore, we won't show any of it!

Wait, what?

Quote from: TJ Doc on Jan 12, 2013, 11:20:50 PM
Their marital issues weren't a major plot point, and they had good chemistry.
No one has good chemistry with Tea Leoni. David Duchovny didn't have good chemistry with Tea Leoni and he's a goddamned sex addict. Hell, I bet Tea Leoni doesn't even have good chemistry with herself.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Jan 12, 2013, 11:27:08 PM
... I like her. :-[
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jan 12, 2013, 11:28:09 PM
...have you seen her in Deep Impact?

Best evidence available that androids do exist and have already infiltrated us.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Jan 12, 2013, 11:29:47 PM
She was good in Bad Boys. At least give me that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Jan 12, 2013, 11:30:50 PM
Are we trying to be cerebral about a popcorn movie like JP?

f**king outstanding.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Jan 12, 2013, 11:31:10 PM
Quote from: TJ Doc on Jan 12, 2013, 11:27:08 PM
... I like her. :-[

You're not alone.

Quote from: TJ Doc on Jan 12, 2013, 11:29:47 PM
She was good in Bad Boys. At least give me that.

I thought she was good in Fun with Dick and Jane as well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Jan 12, 2013, 11:34:08 PM
I have not seen that.

Though I haven't seen much post-2000 Jim Carrey stuff.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jan 12, 2013, 11:36:12 PM
She seems like a very nice person, and it's horrible what Duchovny did to her.

But still. The woman cannot act.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzMGDdUyHkQ#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzMGDdUyHkQ#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jan 12, 2013, 11:36:27 PM
She was great in Bad Boys. I haven't seen Dick & Jane yet either.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 12, 2013, 11:37:09 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Jan 12, 2013, 11:06:17 PM
Actually, Velociraptors ate the crew, but they cut that from the movie.

Heard about that a while ago. f**king sucks.

Quote from: ScardyFox on Jan 12, 2013, 11:30:50 PM
Are we trying to be cerebral about a popcorn movie like JP?

f**king outstanding.

Cvalda started it! :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 12, 2013, 11:39:10 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 12, 2013, 11:22:36 PM
Yes! Having the T-Rex single-handedly and mysteriously take out everyone on the boat is cooler... therefore, we won't show any of it!

By the sounds of things even if they had shown a scene of the animal killing the crew on the boat you still wouldn't have liked the film. So why do you even care?

For me the boat and it's dead crew were just there as an easy way of the T-Rex getting to the mainland. It works for me and many others. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury I (hope I've) rest my case.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 12, 2013, 11:45:54 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7cRx_7umjE#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7cRx_7umjE#ws)

I always felt bad for Cooper. :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jan 12, 2013, 11:49:38 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jan 12, 2013, 11:37:09 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Jan 12, 2013, 11:06:17 PM
Actually, Velociraptors ate the crew, but they cut that from the movie.

Heard about that a while ago. f**king sucks.

Quote from: ScardyFox on Jan 12, 2013, 11:30:50 PM
Are we trying to be cerebral about a popcorn movie like JP?

f**king outstanding.

Cvalda started it! :P


(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F85.imagebam.com%2Fdownload%2FIipLLupLIdhg6H-ZIp5j0Q%2F20328%2F203276255%2Fdisapproval.gif&hash=8bc02de63edafb57022060532820d952898705b1)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 12, 2013, 11:51:51 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Jan 12, 2013, 11:16:14 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Jan 12, 2013, 11:06:17 PM
Actually, Velociraptors ate the crew, but they cut that from the movie.

That would have made more sense and added more tension to the films climax... Why Spielberg.. why :P
Can you imagine Raptors running loose in San Fran?!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jan 12, 2013, 11:53:34 PM
PURE AWESOME.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Jan 12, 2013, 11:55:41 PM
With the T-Rex and Raptors running around the city it would be like a big budget version of Carnosaur...

f**k, that would be awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Jan 13, 2013, 12:04:28 AM
Quote from: TJ Doc on Jan 12, 2013, 10:12:50 PM
You cruel man.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimageshack.us%2Fscaled%2Flanding%2F132%2Ftlwdieterstark.jpg&hash=3ad131bcb91504a987a097e1f05df4878f328935)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 13, 2013, 12:20:51 AM
Wasn't there supposed to be some outrageous seen in TLW with them on motorbikes being chased by Raptors, forcing them to drive off a cliff and fly away on hang gliders that came out of their backpacks where they then fought off Pterodactyls?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jan 13, 2013, 12:22:59 AM
They're probably just saving that for the fourth one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 13, 2013, 12:25:00 AM
Quote from: TJ Doc on Jan 12, 2013, 11:20:50 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 12, 2013, 11:12:59 PM
Quote from: TJ Doc on Jan 12, 2013, 10:54:01 PM
William H. Macy and Tea Leoni were another bonus.

Their dialogue was cringe-worthy. What the hell is this, marriage counseling on an island with dinosaurs? Pfft.

Their marital issues weren't a major plot point, and they had good chemistry.

It was fine.

It sucked! It was so out of place. It made the movie feel more like a lame family-adventure romp than an intense sci-fi action flick.

Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 13, 2013, 12:22:59 AM
They're probably just saving that for the fourth one.

It was supposed to be in the fourth actually when Spielberg was still tossing about the idea of humanoid dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 13, 2013, 12:25:54 AM
Too bad JP doesn't take place in the Alien Universe. Imagine InGen mixing with Weyland-Yutani to create an alien-Rapto hybrid like this:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lost-world.org%2Fart%2FALIEN-Raptor.jpg&hash=aa82ca985da5362aafcad904c82ea79838c07ee4)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jan 13, 2013, 12:29:50 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Jan 13, 2013, 12:25:54 AM
Too bad JP doesn't take place in the Alien Universe. Imagine InGen mixing with Weyland-Yutani to create an alien-Rapto hybrid like this:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lost-world.org%2Fart%2FALIEN-Raptor.jpg&hash=aa82ca985da5362aafcad904c82ea79838c07ee4)

Simply put, we would be screwed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 13, 2013, 12:42:57 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Jan 13, 2013, 12:20:51 AM
Wasn't there supposed to be some outrageous seen in TLW with them on motorbikes being chased by Raptors, forcing them to drive off a cliff and fly away on hang gliders that came out of their backpacks where they then fought off Pterodactyls?

what. the. f**k.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 13, 2013, 12:51:29 AM
I just really want to see the crew go back to Nublar and find the Barbasol can - and Nedry's skeleton in the rusty Jeep.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jan 13, 2013, 01:15:47 AM
Been there, Done that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 13, 2013, 01:29:03 AM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Jan 13, 2013, 01:15:47 AM
Been there, Done that.

Lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Jan 13, 2013, 01:30:40 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 12, 2013, 11:22:36 PM
Quote from: TJ Doc on Jan 12, 2013, 11:20:50 PM
Their marital issues weren't a major plot point, and they had good chemistry.
No one has good chemistry with Tea Leoni. David Duchovny didn't have good chemistry with Tea Leoni and he's a goddamned sex addict. Hell, I bet Tea Leoni doesn't even have good chemistry with herself.
Ricky Gervais in Ghost Town.

Takes a man with a hyena laugh who looks like a sausage to do it, but it happened.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 13, 2013, 05:15:37 AM
My biggest problem with TLW is that it's a little too long. Also, David Koepp was a dumbass for taking writing advice from a nine year old.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Jan 13, 2013, 05:30:28 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Jan 13, 2013, 12:20:51 AM
Wasn't there supposed to be some outrageous seen in TLW with them on motorbikes being chased by Raptors, forcing them to drive off a cliff and fly away on hang gliders that came out of their backpacks where they then fought off Pterodactyls?

It was just the main characters running towards a cliff and jumping off with parachutes. No motorbikes were involved. But the raptors were supposed to fall off the cliff. Glad they scrapped the idea.

For Jp4, I'd love some the Lost World novel scenes to make an appearance. Raptors climbing a "high Hide" type structure, The Jeep and Motorcycle raptor chase, and definitely the Carnotaur scene.

Words cannot describe how excited I am to hear more about JP4.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 13, 2013, 05:35:16 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jan 13, 2013, 05:15:37 AM
My biggest problem with TLW is that it's a little too long. Also, David Koepp was a dumbass for taking writing advice from a nine year old.

You're the 2nd person to say this. Is it actually true?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jan 13, 2013, 05:47:00 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jan 13, 2013, 05:15:37 AM
My biggest problem with TLW is that it's a little too long. Also, David Koepp was a dumbass for taking writing advice from a nine year old.
But isn't that the target audience? That's the age most of us saw it at and responded with dewy-eyed awe. That kind of imprinting seems to have maintained its hold on a lot of people, regardless of how the film's considerable flaws only become more and more apparent as one gets older and sees more films.

The Jurassic Park series is aimed squarely at kids. That's why all three films feature child co-leads. Expect more of the same from the fourth one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 13, 2013, 05:51:57 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 13, 2013, 05:47:00 AM
The Jurassic Park series is aimed squarely at kids. That's why all three films feature child co-leads. Expect more of the same from the fourth one.

Oh shit, if Justin Bieber is in this, I want to see him get eaten by Raptors  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 13, 2013, 06:09:44 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 13, 2013, 05:35:16 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jan 13, 2013, 05:15:37 AM
My biggest problem with TLW is that it's a little too long. Also, David Koepp was a dumbass for taking writing advice from a nine year old.

You're the 2nd person to say this. Is it actually true?

I'm having a hard time finding the quote, but I do recall reading it somewhere.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ShadowPred on Jan 13, 2013, 06:11:00 AM
Same here.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Jan 13, 2013, 06:23:59 AM
I always figured Jurassic Park was an adult film that kids could enjoy. Similar to Indiana Jones, Ghostbusters or Aliens. A movie aimed squarely at kids wouldn't be rated PG13 and have people getting killed by dinosaurs, or adults debating the morality of cloning extinct creatures.  Sure, Jurassic park had characters that kids could relate to, but there were more adult characters that were the focus of the the story. When i was a kid, I didn't watch movies so that I could pretend I was a kid in that situation. I would pretend that I was Alan Grant, or Indiana jones. In other words, the hero, not the person being rescued.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 13, 2013, 06:25:35 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 13, 2013, 05:47:00 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jan 13, 2013, 05:15:37 AM
My biggest problem with TLW is that it's a little too long. Also, David Koepp was a dumbass for taking writing advice from a nine year old.
But isn't that the target audience? That's the age most of us saw it at and responded with dewy-eyed awe. That kind of imprinting seems to have maintained its hold on a lot of people, regardless of how the film's considerable flaws only become more and more apparent as one gets older and sees more films.

The Jurassic Park series is aimed squarely at kids. That's why all three films feature child co-leads. Expect more of the same from the fourth one.

The first film, not so much and I'd argue even the second film wasn't that kid-friendly. The third definitely the most out of the bunch.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ShadowPred on Jan 13, 2013, 06:31:20 AM
1993 - After that movie, every single f**king kid loved Dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Jan 13, 2013, 06:32:51 AM
Can't blame someone for wanting their favorite franchise to grow up with them. Sure, it's unrealistic, but I can dream!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 13, 2013, 06:50:59 AM
I remember when I saw Jurassic Park in theaters for the first time. I was still in my mother's womb.  :laugh:

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 13, 2013, 10:44:15 AM
Quote from: Remonster on Jan 13, 2013, 06:23:59 AM
I always figured Jurassic Park was an adult film that kids could enjoy. Similar to Indiana Jones, Ghostbusters or Aliens. A movie aimed squarely at kids wouldn't be rated PG13 and have people getting killed by dinosaurs, or adults debating the morality of cloning extinct creatures.  Sure, Jurassic park had characters that kids could relate to, but there were more adult characters that were the focus of the the story. When i was a kid, I didn't watch movies so that I could pretend I was a kid in that situation. I would pretend that I was Alan Grant, or Indiana jones. In other words, the hero, not the person being rescued.

This.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ShadowPred on Jan 13, 2013, 10:51:01 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Jan 13, 2013, 06:50:59 AM
I remember when I saw Jurassic Park in theaters for the first time. I was still in my mother's womb.  :laugh:




(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi124.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fp30%2FShadowPred%2Ftumblr_mdcrde83mg1qetk25o5_250.gif&hash=368d513eabed4708632a6385e4ad8b843ab17018)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 13, 2013, 10:58:27 AM
I've just released my dinosaur adventure novel so the arrival of Jurassic Park IV will hopefully bode well for me, as dinosaurs make a big come back into pop culture. *fingers crossed*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Jan 13, 2013, 11:23:37 AM
Quote from: ShadowPred on Jan 13, 2013, 10:51:01 AM
http://i124.photobucket.com/albums/p30/ShadowPred/tumblr_mdcrde83mg1qetk25o5_250.gif

She's so insanely cute in that movie...

Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 13, 2013, 10:58:27 AM
I've just released my dinosaur adventure novel so the arrival of Jurassic Park IV will hopefully bode well for me, as dinosaurs make a big come back into pop culture. *fingers crossed*

Alien 3 sucks!
Spoiler
:P
[close]

I mean best of luck - genuinely.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 13, 2013, 12:10:02 PM
Quote from: ScardyFox on Jan 13, 2013, 11:23:37 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 13, 2013, 10:58:27 AM
I've just released my dinosaur adventure novel so the arrival of Jurassic Park IV will hopefully bode well for me, as dinosaurs make a big come back into pop culture. *fingers crossed*

Alien 3 sucks!
Spoiler
:P
[close]

I mean best of luck - genuinely.

Thank you.

Spoiler
One day you'll eat your words, and when you do I'll be there with a spork in hand to feed you.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 13, 2013, 12:19:25 PM
Aliens, Terminator 2, Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, The Host, The Ring and Underworld: Awakening are aimed squarely at kids. That's why all of these films feature child co-leads.

Quote from: Remonster on Jan 13, 2013, 06:23:59 AM
I always figured Jurassic Park was an adult film that kids could enjoy. Similar to Indiana Jones, Ghostbusters or Aliens. A movie aimed squarely at kids wouldn't be rated PG13 and have people getting killed by dinosaurs, or adults debating the morality of cloning extinct creatures.  Sure, Jurassic park had characters that kids could relate to, but there were more adult characters that were the focus of the the story. When i was a kid, I didn't watch movies so that I could pretend I was a kid in that situation. I would pretend that I was Alan Grant, or Indiana jones. In other words, the hero, not the person being rescued.
This. They're blockbuster films aimed at a much wider audience than just kids.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 13, 2013, 01:31:21 PM
Exactly. These are made for adults, yet attract children due to the dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 13, 2013, 01:32:50 PM
And the toys.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 13, 2013, 01:42:57 PM
Some people are too "mature" to enjoy products designed for a wide range of people. It saddens me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 13, 2013, 03:50:11 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 13, 2013, 12:19:25 PM
Aliens, Terminator 2, The Host, The Ring

Something tells me that quite a few parents would challenge you on your notion that those are aimed "squarely" at kids.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 13, 2013, 03:58:01 PM
They have child co-leads dude. Totally aimed squarely at kids.

Spoiler
That's the damned point.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 13, 2013, 04:06:06 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 13, 2013, 03:50:11 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 13, 2013, 12:19:25 PM
Aliens, Terminator 2, The Host, The Ring

Something tells me that quite a few parents would challenge you on your notion that those are aimed "squarely" at kids.

Someone can't into sarcasm.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 13, 2013, 04:16:44 PM
Hard to pick up online.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jan 13, 2013, 04:18:21 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 13, 2013, 12:19:25 PM
Aliens, Terminator 2, Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, The Host, The Ring and Underworld: Awakening are aimed squarely at kids. That's why all of these films feature child co-leads.
You'd almost have a point -- were it not for the fact that ALL the Jurassic Park films (not just one-offs like you listed) are kid-driven. And that most of their existence hinges on the toys they sell. To kids. (And overgrown kids in their 20s).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Eva on Jan 13, 2013, 04:24:29 PM
The biggest disappointment with TLW was IMO how they pretty much ditched the whole 'standing on the shoulders of others achievements and taking the next step for profit, not for science' theme of the first one, in favor of a going-by-the-numbers action adventure. The irony is how they kept Ian Malcolm (the harshest critic of John Hammonds theme park and proponent of the above viewpoint), but reduced him to a generic action hero, repeating how this, uh, will end badly some 57 times. And his daughter is just obnoxious...

It might be faithful to Crichtons book, but it was just underwhelming as a film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jan 13, 2013, 04:26:11 PM
Quote from: Eva on Jan 13, 2013, 04:24:29 PM
It might be faithful to Crichtons book, but it was just underwhelming as a film.
Not at all, actually. They're almost completely different :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 13, 2013, 04:27:01 PM
It wasn't faithful to Crichton's novel. At all. Remember all the preachy animal rights crap? Not in the novel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 13, 2013, 04:27:58 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 13, 2013, 04:18:21 PM
You'd almost have a point -- were it not for the fact that ALL the Jurassic Park films (not just one-offs like you listed) are kid-driven.
The children are co-leads. The kid/s  never, ever overshadow adult characters. There is very little difference between the roles of, say, Lex and John Connor in the second Terminator.

Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 13, 2013, 04:18:21 PM
And that most of their existence hinges on the toys they sell. To kids. (And overgrown kids in their 20s).
If we're going there...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F-vUjPwzuraeo%2FTxZfd2vQu7I%2FAAAAAAAAAcI%2Fxp_eJONkt50%2Fs1600%2FAlien_AlienQueen.jpg&hash=10040b0353973b3615407fdbeac004c1374bf52d)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdi1-2.shoppingshadow.com%2Fimages%2Fpi%2F95%2F29%2F61%2F110677874-260x260-0-0_toy%2Bisland%2Bvtg%2B1995%2Btoy%2Bisland%2Bterminator%2B2%2Bt%2B1000.jpg&hash=7ee25d6c3b2f8671bb3ac434f2118691dd5e4731)

(And these are just examples)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Jan 13, 2013, 04:33:52 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jan 13, 2013, 04:27:01 PM
It wasn't faithful to Crichton's novel. At all. Remember all the preachy animal rights crap? Not in the novel.

Or the juvenile T Rex tearing that dude apart (slowly) because it was treating him like a kitten practicing it's mousing on a mouse.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jan 13, 2013, 04:36:49 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 13, 2013, 04:27:58 PM
If we're going there...

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-vUjPwzuraeo/TxZfd2vQu7I/AAAAAAAAAcI/xp_eJONkt50/s1600/Alien_AlienQueen.jpg

http://di1-2.shoppingshadow.com/images/pi/95/29/61/110677874-260x260-0-0_toy+island+vtg+1995+toy+island+terminator+2+t+1000.jpg

(And these are just examples)
Not very good examples. Aliens toys were made years after the film, and no toys were marketed for Alien 3. The series is not very kid friendly, although Aliens is the most so -- hence, the toys. Terminator 2 was also a one-off. Also, all of those films were rated R and never compromised themselves for a PG-13 rating to appeal to kids. All three Jurassic Park did.

You keep trotting out one-off examples. Jurassic Park, especially after the first one, just became like Star Wars or Transformers -- a marketing machine aimed at selling toys to kids. Denying it only makes you look like a fanboy desperate to position a franchise that obviously panders to kids as something that's mature and grown up, because you yourself were one of those kids and want it to grow up with you. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 13, 2013, 04:37:15 PM
Quote from: Eva on Jan 13, 2013, 04:24:29 PM
The biggest disappointment with TLW was IMO how they pretty much ditched the whole 'standing on the shoulders of others achievements and taking the next step for profit

Peter Ludlow ring a bell?

Oh and who cares who the films are targeting? Let's just hope the 4th feels and fits into the franchise nicely.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 13, 2013, 04:42:10 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 13, 2013, 04:36:49 PMDenying it only makes you look like a fanboy desperate to position a franchise that obviously panders to kids as something that's mature and grown up, because you yourself were one of those kids and want it to grow up with you.

It must be horrible to hate fun and act "mature" all the time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 13, 2013, 04:44:35 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 13, 2013, 04:36:49 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 13, 2013, 04:27:58 PM
If we're going there...

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-vUjPwzuraeo/TxZfd2vQu7I/AAAAAAAAAcI/xp_eJONkt50/s1600/Alien_AlienQueen.jpg

http://di1-2.shoppingshadow.com/images/pi/95/29/61/110677874-260x260-0-0_toy+island+vtg+1995+toy+island+terminator+2+t+1000.jpg

(And these are just examples)
Not very good examples. Aliens toys were made years after the film, and no toys were marketed for Alien 3. The series is not very kid friendly, although Aliens is the most so -- hence, the toys. Terminator 2 was also a one-off. Also, all of those films were rated R and never compromised themselves for a PG-13 rating to appeal to kids. All three Jurassic Park did.

You keep trotting out one-off examples. Jurassic Park, especially after the first one, just became like Star Wars or Transformers -- a marketing machine aimed at selling toys to kids. Denying it only makes you look like a fanboy desperate to position a franchise that obviously panders to kids as something that's mature and grown up, because you yourself were one of those kids and want it to grow up with you.

You and Hubbs should should just get a room already.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Eva on Jan 13, 2013, 04:45:07 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 13, 2013, 04:37:15 PM
Quote from: Eva on Jan 13, 2013, 04:24:29 PM
The biggest disappointment with TLW was IMO how they pretty much ditched the whole 'standing on the shoulders of others achievements and taking the next step for profit

Peter Ludlow ring a bell?

Ahem, no... :-\

Regarding TLW - yeah it makes sense that they made some big changes for the film. I haven't read it, but I've seen several films made from his stories and there's some pretty good ones concerning the dangers or misuse of technology - Westworld and Coma comes to mind.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Jan 13, 2013, 04:46:07 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jan 13, 2013, 04:42:10 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 13, 2013, 04:36:49 PMDenying it only makes you look like a fanboy desperate to position a franchise that obviously panders to kids as something that's mature and grown up, because you yourself were one of those kids and want it to grow up with you.

It must be horrible to hate fun and act "mature" all the time.

Cvalda mature?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lf_KrGP61uo# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lf_KrGP61uo#)


Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 13, 2013, 04:47:05 PM
notice the " "
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 13, 2013, 04:47:35 PM
Quote from: Eva on Jan 13, 2013, 04:45:07 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 13, 2013, 04:37:15 PM
Quote from: Eva on Jan 13, 2013, 04:24:29 PM
The biggest disappointment with TLW was IMO how they pretty much ditched the whole 'standing on the shoulders of others achievements and taking the next step for profit

Peter Ludlow ring a bell?

Ahem, no... :-\

Regarding TLW - yeah it makes sense that they made some big changes for the film. I haven't read it, but I've seen several films made from his stories and there's some pretty good ones concerning the dangers or misuse of technology - Westworld and Coma comes to mind.

I apologise, I thought you were talking about the films, not the books.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jan 13, 2013, 04:48:27 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jan 13, 2013, 04:42:10 PM
It must be horrible to hate fun and act "mature" all the time.
But I am having fun! Watching you form bro-circles around your precious fanboy totems is fun.

I think the first Jurassic Park is excellent, btw. It's not like I hate the whole series. Just the shitty, cash grab sequels.

Quote from: ScardyFox on Jan 13, 2013, 04:46:07 PM

Cvalda mature?
Aren't you missing the latest episode of Rush Limbaugh or something?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 13, 2013, 04:51:32 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 13, 2013, 04:48:27 PM
I think the first Jurassic Park is excellent, btw. It's not like I hate the whole series. Just the shitty, cash grab sequels.

Always money, money, money with you people.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Jan 13, 2013, 04:52:02 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jan 13, 2013, 04:47:05 PM
notice the " "

I know I know... but it's just so unfitting, satirical other wise, it literally made me lol.

Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 13, 2013, 04:48:27 PM
Aren't you missing the latest episode of Rush Limbaugh or something?

Nope.

Aren't you missing the latest episode of self destructive moaners?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Eva on Jan 13, 2013, 04:54:17 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 13, 2013, 04:47:35 PM
I apologise, I thought you were talking about the films, not the books.
I was. Obviously, I'm missing something here...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 13, 2013, 04:57:05 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 13, 2013, 04:36:49 PM
Aliens toys were made years after the film,
Irrelevant. Series of toys was titled 'Aliens' with the film font. Obviously aimed at those kids who had watched the film and found it appealing. If they made the figures in the first place, it's because they saw marketing potential in the film.

Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 13, 2013, 04:36:49 PM
and no toys were marketed for Alien 3.
...but suddenly! Alien: Resurrection came in and...
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Foutlandct.com%2Fcatalog%2Fimages%2Falienrwarrioralien&hash=069fd2922d24e8a7d5d38e3b30515d01e1096854)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdi1-2.shoppingshadow.com%2Fimages%2Fpi%2F1f%2Fdf%2F8e%2F106248309-260x260-0-0_hasbro%2Bhasbro%2Bsignature%2Bseries%2Balien%2Bresurrection%2B.jpg&hash=f3d05f2689588058f2f36878e48a9f381ed28e4f)

Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 13, 2013, 04:36:49 PM
although Aliens is the most so
Not in the slightest.

Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 13, 2013, 04:36:49 PM
Also, all of those films were rated R and never compromised themselves for a PG-13 rating to appeal to kids.
Here's where I wanted you. Nowhere in your 'argument' did you mention ratings; you just said that they were aimed squarely at kids because they had child co-leads. :)
That's also why I purposedly selected films with different ratings: whereas yes, most of the films I mentioned are R, The Ring is PG-13, and Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom is PG. Both are not R and have child co-leads.

Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 13, 2013, 04:36:49 PM
Denying it only makes you look like a fanboy desperate to position a franchise that obviously panders to kids as something that's mature and grown up, because you yourself were one of those kids and want it to grow up with you.
This I can answer two ways:

A. You're desperately trying to troll, using a pathetic semi-attempt at a psychological analysis;

B. Benefit of doubt; Jurassic Park is a blockbuster series. It is aimed to appeal to all ages, not squarely at kids. Many other blockbusters have had their toys: Independence Day had a toyline; The Lord of the Rings (3 films) had a toyline; these two were not aimed squarely at kids. Otherwise, many things would not be there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 13, 2013, 05:01:57 PM
Quote from: Eva on Jan 13, 2013, 04:54:17 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 13, 2013, 04:47:35 PM
I apologise, I thought you were talking about the films, not the books.
I was. Obviously, I'm missing something here...

Peter Ludlow (I gather you thought was a character from the book of TLW) is John Hammond's nephew in the movie who wants to reinvent Jurassic Park and bring it to San Diego. You said...

"The biggest disappointment with TLW was IMO how they pretty much ditched the whole 'standing on the shoulders of others achievements and taking the next step for profit"

Which means you've forgotten about Peter Ludlow and how that theme from the first film was carried over into the sequel.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Eva on Jan 13, 2013, 05:11:19 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 13, 2013, 05:01:57 PM
Quote from: Eva on Jan 13, 2013, 04:54:17 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 13, 2013, 04:47:35 PM
I apologise, I thought you were talking about the films, not the books.
I was. Obviously, I'm missing something here...

Peter Ludlow (I gather you thought was a character from the book of TLW) is John Hammond's nephew in the movie who wants to reinvent Jurassic Park and bring it to San Diego. You said...

"The biggest disappointment with TLW was IMO how they pretty much ditched the whole 'standing on the shoulders of others achievements and taking the next step for profit"

Which means you've forgotten about Peter Ludlow and how that theme from the first film was carried over into the sequel.

Ah, right. I remember the character, but I had forgotten his name in the film/book. That's why it didn't ring a bell.

Anyways, I didn't think that particular theme was treated in TWL with the same level of emphasis and scrutiny as it was in JP. The discussion Hammond has with the scientists around the dinner table in the first film is one of my favorite scenes for the same reason.

Ludlow's character and agenda in TLW, reminds me more of a rip off of King Kong than a continuation of themes from JP. But I guess that's all subjective anyway.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 13, 2013, 05:16:57 PM
TLW is one giant throw back to King Kong. Some (like myself) think it was a wise move.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Jan 13, 2013, 05:22:26 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 13, 2013, 04:57:05 PM
A. You're desperately trying to troll, using a pathetic semi-attempt at a psychological analysis;

You have to keep in mind she doesn't troll, she suffers from delusions of ridiculous grandeur. She genuinely believes herself to be scholarly and knowledgeable when she throws out some of the most bitterly fueled ignorance I have ever seen on any forum I have ever belonged to. Her dime-store analysis of your psychological profile and the movie at hand illustrates exactly that. She actually believes she is correct about both things, adamantly. As though they're an asbolutely and she is clever enough to see through the "BS" to the crux of it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 13, 2013, 05:32:11 PM
Quote from: Eva on Jan 13, 2013, 04:24:29 PM
It might be faithful to Crichtons book, but it was just underwhelming as a film.
Not exactly. The movie is drastically different in plot and characters that aren't even in the novel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jan 13, 2013, 05:33:51 PM
Quote from: ScardyFox on Jan 13, 2013, 04:52:02 PM
Aren't you missing the latest episode of self destructive moaners?
I don't watch Fox News, sorry.

Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 13, 2013, 04:57:05 PM
Irrelevant. Series of toys was titled 'Aliens' with the film font. Obviously aimed at those kids who had watched the film and found it appealing. If they made the figures in the first place, it's because they saw marketing potential in the film.
And how successful were they? Let's find out below!

Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 13, 2013, 04:57:05 PM
...but suddenly! Alien: Resurrection came in and...
http://outlandct.com/catalog/images/alienrwarrioralien
http://di1-2.shoppingshadow.com/images/pi/1f/df/8e/106248309-260x260-0-0_hasbro+hasbro+signature+series+alien+resurrection+.jpg
...and they bombed magnificently. Because the series isn't aimed at kids, kids weren't into the films, and no Alien film since has had toys aimed at kids marketed after it. Even AVP, with its family friendly PG-13 rating!

Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 13, 2013, 04:57:05 PM
Not in the slightest.
You're really going to argue that of the four films, Aliens isn't the most kid-friendly? Good luck with that.

Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 13, 2013, 04:57:05 PM
Here's where I wanted you. Nowhere in your 'argument' did you mention ratings; you just said that they were aimed squarely at kids because they had child co-leads. :)
That's also why I purposedly selected films with different ratings: whereas yes, most of the films I mentioned are R, The Ring is PG-13, and Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom is PG. Both are not R and have child co-leads.
You should have enough common sense to know that an R-rated horror film with child co-leads is obviously including them for reasons other than to pander to that demographic :) And, uh, Temple of Doom is geared toward kids. Just randomly grabbing at films that feature child co-leads for story reasons is different than the child co-leads of the Jurassic Park films, which forceably insert them into the narrative for no other reason but to serve as audience surrogate for the little tykes the films want to sell toys to.

Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 13, 2013, 04:57:05 PM
This I can answer two ways:

A. You're desperately trying to troll, using a pathetic semi-attempt at a psychological analysis;
It wasn't really desperate, it was pretty easy.

Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 13, 2013, 04:57:05 PM
B. Benefit of doubt; Jurassic Park is a blockbuster series. It is aimed to appeal to all ages, not squarely at kids. Many other blockbusters have had their toys: Independence Day had a toyline; The Lord of the Rings (3 films) had a toyline; these two were not aimed squarely at kids. Otherwise, many things would not be there.
Lord of the Rings toys were aimed more at grown up nerds then they ever were at kids, just like the series itself. And yeah, blockbusters are aimed at all ages -- but the Jurassic Park films shamelessly dumb themselves down well past that point.

Quote from: ScardyFox on Jan 13, 2013, 05:22:26 PM
You have to keep in mind she doesn't troll, she suffers from delusions of ridiculous grandeur. She genuinely believes herself to be scholarly and knowledgeable when she throws out some of the most bitterly fueled ignorance I have ever seen on any forum I have ever belonged to. Her dime-store analysis of your psychological profile and the movie at hand illustrates exactly that. She actually believes she is correct about both things, adamantly. As though they're an asbolutely and she is clever enough to see through the "BS" to the crux of it.
One dime-store analysis for another. The irony.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Jan 13, 2013, 05:40:29 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 13, 2013, 05:33:51 PM
One dime-store analysis for another. The irony.

I'm not coming up with a baseless analysis - it's plastered all over every one of your nasty little post. While on the other hand you're trying to give the impression you have the slightest idea about omega's childhood? Your ignorance is fantastically breath taking.

20 something year old forum savant.

Outstanding, lol. You don't know shit about anything yet think you know everything.

Now that is irony.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jan 13, 2013, 05:46:23 PM
Quote from: ScardyFox on Jan 13, 2013, 05:40:29 PM
I'm not coming up with a baseless analysis - it's plastered all over every one of your nasty little post.
More irony!

Quote from: ScardyFox on Jan 13, 2013, 05:40:29 PM
Outstanding, lol. You don't know shit about anything yet think you know everything.
I feel like you're projecting here.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 13, 2013, 05:47:05 PM
Not sure exactly what's going on here, but is everyone hating on Cvalda?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Jan 13, 2013, 05:53:26 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 13, 2013, 05:46:23 PM

I feel like you're projecting here.

Nope, pointing out your woeful empty-headedness.

Keep up, you're a bright girl, right? Or is that superseded by your need to be a "bitch"? Hey whatever happened to that little quote you had? Lifes a bitch and so am I, was it? You're not a bitch, you're just a child who has mini tantrums on the forum.

You'll be fine... oh wait, maybe not. What were you saying the other day when rick said he was trying to change who he is? People can't change no matter what (for brevity sake)? Lets pretend that isn't the most f**king stupid thing I have ever read (ever)... I guess that would make you screwed then huh?

You sure you want to be known as a bitch for the rest of your life?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 13, 2013, 05:59:07 PM
Look guys, Jurassic Park 4 has just been announced I wanna see people talking about that and keep the arguing elsewhere. Can we get back on topic?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Jan 13, 2013, 06:00:43 PM
Let's calm down.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jan 13, 2013, 06:01:46 PM
This is getting ugly, folks... :/

Quote from: Requiem28 on Jan 13, 2013, 05:47:05 PM
Not sure exactly what's going on here, but is everyone hating on Cvalda?

She said that Jurassic Park is aimed at kids. And it is. I see it as more of an all ages affair as some of the stuff in there isnt exactly kid friendly
(severed arm? Lots of people getting eaten? ? Stupid "science is baddd" moralizing on cloning? Kid friendly? Maybe in Spielberg's head.)
but it does pander to kids. UNIX, anyone?

Still fun films :)
And i hope part 4 continues with the kid friendly tradition cause i want to go see it with my younger brother.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Jan 13, 2013, 06:02:36 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 13, 2013, 05:59:07 PM
Look guys, Jurassic Park 4 has just been announced I wanna see people talking about that and keep the arguing elsewhere. Please you're ruining it.

You're correct. Usually I wouldn't care but seeing Omega get attacked for pretty much no reason (when he is one of the nicest people here) warranted a response, in my opinion. However, that said I will move on so not to sully the thread any longer.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 13, 2013, 06:09:26 PM
You people are right. I was simply discussing. In spoiler the last post I wrote on the subject (so the scrolling isn't as long and you do not have to read it)...

Spoiler
Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 13, 2013, 05:33:51 PM
...and they bombed magnificently. Because the series isn't aimed at kids, kids weren't into the films, and no Alien film since has had toys aimed at kids marketed after it. Even AVP, with its family friendly PG-13 rating!
AvP had the McFarlane series, which was also aimed at kids.
The toylines were made regardless (as marketing potential was seen), and people did buy them. Otherwise you wouldn't have so many eBay sellers selling them.

Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 13, 2013, 05:33:51 PM
You're really going to argue that of the four films, Aliens isn't the most kid-friendly? Good luck with that.
You're really going to argue that of the four films, Aliens is the most kid-friendly? Good luck with that.

Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 13, 2013, 05:33:51 PM
You should have enough common sense to know that an R-rated horror film with child co-leads is obviously including them for reasons other than to pander to that demographic :)
And you should have enough common sense to know that the presence of a child co-lead does not automatically make a film aimed squarely at kids. ;)

Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 13, 2013, 05:33:51 PM
And, uh, Temple of Doom is geared toward kids.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Freplygif.net%2Fi%2F735&hash=49aceb583ca9cf72e11f121123bd8362037e3a23)

V

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=78ylgOm3MGw# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=78ylgOm3MGw#)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mk2E1CoGe98#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mk2E1CoGe98#ws)

Yes, you're absolutely right.

Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 13, 2013, 05:33:51 PM
Lord of the Rings toys were aimed more at grown up nerds
They were widely publicized in kid's toys catalogs. :)

Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 13, 2013, 05:33:51 PMbut the Jurassic Park films shamelessly dumb themselves down well past that point.
Certainly. They dumb themselves down with:

-A Dinosaur grabbing a guy on a toilet with its mouth, then thrashing him;
-A severed arm with a bloody stump on one end;
-A waterfall turning red with a sound of bones crunching;
-A man being bitten by tiny Dinosaurs, with blood coming out of his wounds -- and later, a river bed turns red;
-Two Dinosaurs shamelessly ripping a man apart to share a meal (although at night);
-A severed hand still attached to a rudder;
-A Dinosaur bloodily snatching a man, with a sound of bones crunching;
-A rotting corpse;
-A Dinosaur approaching a man and sinking a claw in his back;
-A Dinosaur snapping a man's neck because he can.
[close]

...aaand scene. Let's move on. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jan 13, 2013, 06:14:15 PM
https://soundcloud.com/birdfeeder/jurassic-park-theme-1000-slower
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 13, 2013, 06:20:33 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Jan 13, 2013, 06:14:15 PM
https://soundcloud.com/birdfeeder/jurassic-park-theme-1000-slower
That could put me to sleep.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 13, 2013, 06:21:14 PM
Makes me wonder what an Inception/Jurassic Park crossover would be like.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 13, 2013, 06:22:50 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 13, 2013, 06:21:14 PM
Makes me wonder what an Inception/Jurassic Park crossover would be like.

They'll have to go deeper.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jan 13, 2013, 06:25:40 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 13, 2013, 06:21:14 PM
Makes me wonder what an Inception/Jurassic Park crossover would be like.

:o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Eva on Jan 13, 2013, 06:35:56 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 13, 2013, 06:21:14 PM
Makes me wonder what an Inception/Jurassic Park crossover would be like.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg802.imageshack.us%2Fimg802%2F1249%2Fdern2.gif&hash=a5c44c50a1839538ae12b2af01a267ec63cf8211)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 13, 2013, 06:36:25 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 13, 2013, 06:21:14 PM
Makes me wonder what an Inception/Jurassic Park crossover would be like.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prG4QlJSuiY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prG4QlJSuiY#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 13, 2013, 07:32:39 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 13, 2013, 06:21:14 PM
Makes me wonder what an Inception/Jurassic Park crossover would be like.

You'll hear it in the generic blockbuster trailer they'll probably release.

Life. BUUURRRR Finds. BURRRRR. A way. BUUUURRR!! Jurassic Park IV.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 13, 2013, 07:41:28 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ll7YzrGbM4#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Ll7YzrGbM4#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jan 14, 2013, 01:45:07 AM
I wonder if we will get a Jurassic Park 4 teaser for the 3D re-release?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 14, 2013, 01:47:47 AM
I doubt it...

But then again, I doubt we;ll even see the movie next year. 2014 just seems awfully close...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jan 14, 2013, 01:53:38 AM
Quote from: ScardyFox on Jan 13, 2013, 05:53:26 PM
Nope, pointing out your woeful empty-headedness.

Keep up, you're a bright girl, right? Or is that superseded by your need to be a "bitch"? Hey whatever happened to that little quote you had? Lifes a bitch and so am I, was it? You're not a bitch, you're just a child who has mini tantrums on the forum.

You'll be fine... oh wait, maybe not. What were you saying the other day when rick said he was trying to change who he is? People can't change no matter what (for brevity sake)? Lets pretend that isn't the most f**king stupid thing I have ever read (ever)... I guess that would make you screwed then huh?

You sure you want to be known as a bitch for the rest of your life?
This is more sad and woeful (and a little creepily obsessive) than anything I've ever posted. No wonder you basically exist in an echo chamber on this forum. No one ever has anything to say to you -- unless it's to "debate" your aggressively pro-gun rants in shootout threads or something.

Oh, and btw, that "Life's a bitch" quote? The one from last year that you obsessively remember? It's a quote from Batman Returns, that went with the matching set I had at the time. Jesus, what a loon.

It's called the "ignore" button. Use it or quit your froth-mouthed whining.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jan 14, 2013, 02:08:04 AM

‎-This is how you make funny posts?
-No. This is how you play God.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jan 14, 2013, 02:22:19 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 14, 2013, 01:53:38 AM
Quote from: ScardyFox on Jan 13, 2013, 05:53:26 PM
Nope, pointing out your woeful empty-headedness.

Keep up, you're a bright girl, right? Or is that superseded by your need to be a "bitch"? Hey whatever happened to that little quote you had? Lifes a bitch and so am I, was it? You're not a bitch, you're just a child who has mini tantrums on the forum.

You'll be fine... oh wait, maybe not. What were you saying the other day when rick said he was trying to change who he is? People can't change no matter what (for brevity sake)? Lets pretend that isn't the most f**king stupid thing I have ever read (ever)... I guess that would make you screwed then huh?

You sure you want to be known as a bitch for the rest of your life?
This is more sad and woeful (and a little creepily obsessive) than anything I've ever posted. No wonder you basically exist in an echo chamber on this forum. No one ever has anything to say to you -- unless it's to "debate" your aggressively pro-gun rants in shootout threads or something.

Oh, and btw, that "Life's a bitch" quote? The one from last year that you obsessively remember? It's a quote from Batman Returns, that went with the matching set I had at the time. Jesus, what a loon.

It's called the "ignore" button. Use it or quit your froth-mouthed whining.




Remember when this thread used to be about Dinosaurs and Parks and shit?

And NOT an argument about personalities and shit?



I do it wasn't that long ago actually can we please go back to that?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jan 14, 2013, 02:36:12 AM
Ah, now eventually we do plan to have dinosaurs on our, on our dinosaur thread, right? Hello?

Hello? Yes?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jan 14, 2013, 02:39:48 AM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Jan 14, 2013, 02:36:12 AM
Ah, now eventually we do plan to have dinosaurs on our, on our dinosaur thread, right? Hello?

Hello? Yes?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_m9lb8jEADn1qherqwo1_400.gif&hash=ce32f05302ad77a91a681d7013045348addb0d52)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ShadowPred on Jan 14, 2013, 02:43:50 AM
Don't know why anyone didn't report the stupidity of the last page.


Let's keep the rest of this page friendly instead of just bullshitting as always, god damn it people.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2013, 03:57:11 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 13, 2013, 05:59:07 PM
Look guys, Jurassic Park 4 has just been announced I wanna see people talking about that and keep the arguing elsewhere. Can we get back on topic?

So Alien3...

I'm working on getting my hands on some Series II material. Do you own any of those?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 14, 2013, 04:05:53 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Jan 14, 2013, 02:39:48 AM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Jan 14, 2013, 02:36:12 AM
Ah, now eventually we do plan to have dinosaurs on our, on our dinosaur thread, right? Hello?

Hello? Yes?

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m9lb8jEADn1qherqwo1_400.gif

This is gonna be in the memory book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 14, 2013, 04:08:10 AM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Jan 14, 2013, 01:45:07 AM
I wonder if we will get a Jurassic Park 4 teaser for the 3D re-release?
Wait until this Fall. around October this year, I can promise you a teaser trailer.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jan 14, 2013, 07:05:06 AM
I remember when we got a AVP teaser when they did the Alien re-release in 2003. So it's possible we might get a small teaser in April.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: coolbreeze on Jan 14, 2013, 07:16:30 AM
No way there's gonna be a teaser in 3 months time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 14, 2013, 09:33:28 AM
Godzilla got a teaser last summer at Comic-Con and it doesn't start filming until March... They could put together a small something.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: coolbreeze on Jan 14, 2013, 09:54:22 AM
I guess they could do a poster.  :-\

I'm still skeptical about a 2014 release though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jan 14, 2013, 10:13:09 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jan 14, 2013, 09:33:28 AM
Godzilla got a teaser last summer at Comic-Con and it doesn't start filming until March... They could put together a small something.

Yeah, agreed, I think we'll see something. It'll probably just be something like TLW's teaser, in which water ripples in a tyrannosaur footprint (ie. not film footage) with a tagline. I'll extend my johnson into the ether and suggest "JP4: When Studying Dromaeosaurids Please Properly Dispose Of Candy Bar Wrappers".

Thinking about it though, The Hobbit had a proper, film footaged trailer available a year away from release - we're only five months out from that with JP4 and they don't even have a director yet, let alone a selection of filmed and processed footage. I really think they're rushing it with that June 2014 date.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 14, 2013, 10:36:30 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2013, 03:57:11 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 13, 2013, 05:59:07 PM
Look guys, Jurassic Park 4 has just been announced I wanna see people talking about that and keep the arguing elsewhere. Can we get back on topic?

So Alien3...

I'm working on getting my hands on some Series II material. Do you own any of those?

From Jurassic Park Series II I have...

Dilophosaurus
Velociraptor
Quetzalcoatlus

Btw my first collection video has just passed 1,000,000 views! 8)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL5zpl-8_Mw#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2013, 10:38:02 AM
Quetz, nice! I want one soooooo badly but the loose ones never seem to have their capture gear with them and unfortunately, the MISB ones are super expensive. I may have struck out on a MISB Carnotaurus though; $275.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 14, 2013, 10:42:18 AM
Yeah, as time goes on they'll rise in price. I got my series II when they were first released so they were not too expensive, still have them from when I was a kid. I hope the JPIV line of toys go back to the old molds they used for JP and TLW because the JP3 toys kinda sucked.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 14, 2013, 03:03:03 PM
Speaking of JP toys, I just realized that the Papo JP Rex head is way out of proportion with the body.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jan 14, 2013, 03:04:43 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jan 14, 2013, 10:13:09 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jan 14, 2013, 09:33:28 AM
Godzilla got a teaser last summer at Comic-Con and it doesn't start filming until March... They could put together a small something.

Yeah, agreed, I think we'll see something. It'll probably just be something like TLW's teaser, in which water ripples in a tyrannosaur footprint (ie. not film footage) with a tagline. I'll extend my johnson into the ether and suggest "JP4: When Studying Dromaeosaurids Please Properly Dispose Of Candy Bar Wrappers".

Thinking about it though, The Hobbit had a proper, film footaged trailer available a year away from release - we're only five months out from that with JP4 and they don't even have a director yet, let alone a selection of filmed and processed footage. I really think they're rushing it with that June 2014 date.

Difference is The Hobbit was a much, much larger production than this will be.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 14, 2013, 03:10:47 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Jan 14, 2013, 03:04:43 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jan 14, 2013, 10:13:09 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jan 14, 2013, 09:33:28 AM
Godzilla got a teaser last summer at Comic-Con and it doesn't start filming until March... They could put together a small something.

Yeah, agreed, I think we'll see something. It'll probably just be something like TLW's teaser, in which water ripples in a tyrannosaur footprint (ie. not film footage) with a tagline. I'll extend my johnson into the ether and suggest "JP4: When Studying Dromaeosaurids Please Properly Dispose Of Candy Bar Wrappers".

Thinking about it though, The Hobbit had a proper, film footaged trailer available a year away from release - we're only five months out from that with JP4 and they don't even have a director yet, let alone a selection of filmed and processed footage. I really think they're rushing it with that June 2014 date.

Difference is The Hobbit was a much, much larger production than this will be.

Godzilla has until next May to be released and they're pretty much at the same stage as JPIV (with the exception of having a director and a possible cast line-up)

Besides, Joe Johnston and many of the original cast members expressed great interest in returning (Sam Niell, Jeff Goldblum, Laura Dern, Joseph Mazzello, possibly Ariana Richards (great painter she has become!) and even Richard Attenborough) 

Bringing back Julianne Moore, hell, even Alessandro Nivola would be cool too. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 14, 2013, 03:15:45 PM
I hate to say it, but normally when a film studio sets a release date out first, that means they'll usually rush the production to get the movie out by that exact date. Whereas you start production, take two-three years to film then set a release date, you're good to go.

Think about it, they have 14 months from now to June 2014 to complete this movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jan 14, 2013, 03:19:01 PM
2-3 years of filming? Dude, not even LotR spent that long on filming.

14 months is plenty of time. Takes roughly 120 days for shooting, on the outside. Keep in mind that even though it's only just been announced officially, preproduction has still been going on for quite some time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 14, 2013, 03:21:54 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Jan 14, 2013, 03:19:01 PM
2-3 years of filming? Dude, not even LotR spent that long on filming.

14 months is plenty of time. Takes roughly 120 days for shooting, on the outside. Keep in mind that even though it's only just been announced officially, preproduction has still been going on for quite some time.

Yes, and with advancements in technology and possibly still some left over JP dino animatronics, it shouldn't take too long to get the special effects done.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 14, 2013, 03:22:18 PM
Since 2001. They've been in development Hell and tons of tossed out scripts.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 14, 2013, 03:39:29 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Jan 14, 2013, 03:15:45 PMtake two-three years to film

Are you trolling?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 14, 2013, 03:41:57 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jan 14, 2013, 03:39:29 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Jan 14, 2013, 03:15:45 PMtake two-three years to film

Are you trolling?
No. I remember when it would take two years for a movie to come out when they announced it. I figured (when I was young) that they filmed the movie in those 2 years. With today's technology you can cut the filming process in half.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 14, 2013, 04:54:59 PM
Even if they don't meet the June 14th 2014 release date, who the hell is going to complain if it gets pushed back? Good things come to those who wait.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2013, 05:55:37 PM
Who's going to complain? Everyone who's been waiting 13 years for this film to come out. It's become the Duke Nukem Forever of Hollywood, sad to say.

Quote from: Requiem28 on Jan 14, 2013, 03:10:47 PM
Alessandro Nivola would be cool too.

Who did he play? I Google-d the name but only came up with results for a soccer player with a different surname.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 14, 2013, 05:56:28 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2013, 05:55:37 PM
Who's going to complain? Everyone who's been waiting 13 years for this film to come out. It's become the Duke Nukem Forever of Hollywood, sad to say.

Quote from: Requiem28 on Jan 14, 2013, 03:10:47 PM
Alessandro Nivola would be cool too.

Who did he play? I Google-d the name but only came up with results for a soccer player with a different surname.

I think he was Billy in JP3. "I saved your hat."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2013, 05:59:41 PM
Ah yeah you're right. I'd rather just stick to the original core cast. They worked extremely well together.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 14, 2013, 06:03:49 PM
But what reason would there be to get them back on an island filled with dinosaurs?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jan 14, 2013, 06:10:02 PM
Well, not many people have actually BEEN to the island. They could easily be considered experts at it by now, even if in reality they're not.

Though to be honest, everything goes to shit at Jurassic Park. This is pretty much common knowledge. I don't think a single one of the original cast members would even risk stepping one foot on that cursed island.




..Honestly, I don't see why anyone would. It's not like dinosaurs are constructing a crude suspension bridge to the mainland or anything.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 14, 2013, 06:10:57 PM
Unless Biosyn blended their DNA with human DNA ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Jan 14, 2013, 06:11:23 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 14, 2013, 06:03:49 PM
But what reason would there be to get them back on an island filled with dinosaurs?

Raptors kidnapped Ellie's kid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 14, 2013, 06:13:51 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Jan 14, 2013, 06:11:23 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 14, 2013, 06:03:49 PM
But what reason would there be to get them back on an island filled with dinosaurs?

Raptors kidnapped Ellie's kid.

They just keep getting smarter!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQrRg3LtjXY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQrRg3LtjXY#ws)

After watching that, I want Samuel L. Jackson to come back :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2013, 07:11:09 PM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Jan 14, 2013, 06:10:02 PM
Well, not many people have actually BEEN to the island. They could easily be considered experts at it by now, even if in reality they're not.

Though to be honest, everything goes to shit at Jurassic Park. This is pretty much common knowledge. I don't think a single one of the original cast members would even risk stepping one foot on that cursed island.




..Honestly, I don't see why anyone would. It's not like dinosaurs are constructing a crude suspension bridge to the mainland or anything.

Stop poaching? It's a realistic story idea.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 14, 2013, 08:19:16 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 14, 2013, 06:03:49 PM
But what reason would there be to get them back on an island filled with dinosaurs?
We need a damn good reason to return to the island.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Jan 14, 2013, 08:19:27 PM
Joe Johnston to direct?

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/rorschachsrants/news/?a=72673 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/rorschachsrants/news/?a=72673)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 14, 2013, 08:23:52 PM
I'd be fine with that. The third film had problems, but he wasn't one of them.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 14, 2013, 08:26:07 PM
Agreed. He sure knows how to create atmosphere, and that's really evident in the film.

Pteranodon scene.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 14, 2013, 08:36:55 PM
His only problem is pacing. JP3, Wolfman, Captain America all had pacing problems.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 14, 2013, 08:37:27 PM
Link is down for me. But yeah, I'd be fine with that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jan 14, 2013, 08:38:14 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 14, 2013, 08:26:07 PM
Agreed. He sure knows how to create atmosphere, and that's really evident in the film.

Pteranodon scene.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgifsoup.com%2Fwebroot%2Fanimatedgifs1%2F1132940_o.gif&hash=c48a6fb7f1fecfba46032e34a6704e5918b0afac)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 14, 2013, 08:39:43 PM
I never thought of Pteranodons as "scary" dinos before JP3. Well played.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jan 14, 2013, 08:41:58 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jan 14, 2013, 08:39:43 PM
I never thought of Pteranodons as "scary" dinos before JP3. Well played.

I never thought of Pteranodons as "dinos" before JP3.


I still don't.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jan 14, 2013, 08:42:10 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jan 14, 2013, 08:37:27 PM
Link is down for me.

Maybe it's true. I guess CBM was force to take it down.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 14, 2013, 08:44:18 PM
Flying reptiles.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 14, 2013, 08:44:23 PM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Jan 14, 2013, 08:41:58 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jan 14, 2013, 08:39:43 PM
I never thought of Pteranodons as "scary" dinos before JP3. Well played.

I never thought of Pteranodons as "dinos" before JP3.


I still don't.

*Derp* Forgot they're not technically dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Jan 14, 2013, 08:44:55 PM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Jan 14, 2013, 08:38:14 PMhttp://gifsoup.com/webroot/animatedgifs1/1132940_o.gif
Yes! I love that scene. Well, everything with the Pteranodons is more or less gold.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 14, 2013, 08:48:23 PM
Hell yes, the Pteranodon turning its head around still sends chills down my spine every time. Masterfully shot. In addition, the score was right-on perfect.
Definitely the best scene in the film in general, right from the beginning with the Pteranodon in the mist.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 14, 2013, 08:50:50 PM
dem animatronics
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 14, 2013, 08:51:49 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 14, 2013, 08:48:23 PM
Hell yes, the Pteranodon turning its head around still sends chills down my spine every time. Masterfully shot. In addition, the score was right-on perfect.
Definitely the best scene in the film in general, right from the beginning with the Pteranodon in the mist.

I agree! So awesome!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 14, 2013, 09:09:55 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 14, 2013, 08:48:23 PM
Hell yes, the Pteranodon turning its head around still sends chills down my spine every time. Masterfully shot. In addition, the score was right-on perfect.
Definitely the best scene in the film in general, right from the beginning with the Pteranodon in the mist.
Definitely! That and the Spino plane attack.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jan 14, 2013, 11:45:36 PM
The greatest youtube comment ever?

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BAkUipKCAAA898y.jpg:large)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 15, 2013, 12:44:56 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 14, 2013, 08:48:23 PM
Hell yes, the Pteranodon turning its head around still sends chills down my spine every time. Masterfully shot. In addition, the score was right-on perfect.
Definitely the best scene in the film in general, right from the beginning with the Pteranodon in the mist.

The Ptero scene is definitely the best sequence in the movie. The buildup to it was really well-done.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jan 15, 2013, 02:52:35 AM
I guess I would have a way easier time watching Jurassic Park III if the T.Rex/Spino fight went differently. The Tyrannosaur would have won as soon as he got his jaws around the Spino's neck in the beginning. That's six tons of force coming together on that thing's thin neck, crushing vertebrae and peircing flesh. Ding ding, spinosaurus aegypticus for dinner, everyone.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 15, 2013, 02:55:14 AM
But the Spino has arms and strength where the T-Rex didn't. He snapped and twisted that things neck like it was easy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jan 15, 2013, 02:57:17 AM
Actually... in reality Spino is believed to have been more frail in comparison to T-rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 15, 2013, 03:03:48 AM
Movie magic. It would have sucked worse had they used T-Rex as the main Dino Baddie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Jan 15, 2013, 03:05:29 AM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Jan 15, 2013, 02:57:17 AM
Actually... in reality Spino is believed to have been more frail in comparison to T-rex.

Yep, Spinosaurus ever since Jurassic Park III has been exaggerated in popular media to ridiculous levels.

Planet Dinosaur so far is the only series to portray (that I know of) what most scientist deduce Spinosaurus was actually like. A fish eating scavenger that once met with a dinosaur made for hunting (Charcaradontosaurs, can't remember the spelling atm) would have only two choices: fight back (which it was not good at it since it was adapted for eating fish and dead animals) or run away, which would be the sensible solution.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jan 15, 2013, 03:07:30 AM
Yes. Spinosaurus is believed by many paleontologists to have been a scavenger and a fisher, much like it's cousin's Baryonyx or Suchomimus. It's spine was a massive weak point as well, filled with nerve endings. Tyrannosaurus is believed by many paleontologists to have been an oppurtunist, able to take down big game if needed, but not hesitating to steal a free corpse from a rival predator. (However few they were.)

Quote from: Rick Grimes on Jan 15, 2013, 02:55:14 AM
But the Spino has arms and strength where the T-Rex didn't. He snapped and twisted that things neck like it was easy.

No, I was referring to the beginning of the fight where the Tyrannosaur bites down on the Spinosaurus' neck. That would have been the end, due to the T.Rex's massive, crushing bite force.

Quote from: Rick Grimes on Jan 15, 2013, 03:03:48 AM
Movie magic. It would have sucked worse had they used T-Rex as the main Dino Baddie.

Could not disagree with you more.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 15, 2013, 03:15:24 AM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Jan 15, 2013, 03:07:30 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Jan 15, 2013, 02:55:14 AM
But the Spino has arms and strength where the T-Rex didn't. He snapped and twisted that things neck like it was easy.
No, I was referring to the beginning of the fight where the Tyrannosaur bites down on the Spinosaurus' neck. That would have been the end, due to the T.Rex's massive, crushing bite force.
If you watch the fight carefully, T-Rex barely, bites down on his neck. He can't even get a good grab on him either. He lightly clamps down before the Spino pushes him away.

Quote from: Dovahkiin on Jan 15, 2013, 03:07:30 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Jan 15, 2013, 03:03:48 AM
Movie magic. It would have sucked worse had they used T-Rex as the main Dino Baddie.
Could not disagree with you more.
In with the old out with the new. I wonder who the main baddie will be in the fourth one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jan 15, 2013, 03:20:46 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Jan 15, 2013, 03:15:24 AM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Jan 15, 2013, 03:07:30 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Jan 15, 2013, 02:55:14 AM
But the Spino has arms and strength where the T-Rex didn't. He snapped and twisted that things neck like it was easy.
No, I was referring to the beginning of the fight where the Tyrannosaur bites down on the Spinosaurus' neck. That would have been the end, due to the T.Rex's massive, crushing bite force.
If you watch the fight carefully, T-Rex barely, bites down on his neck. He can't even get a good grab on him either. He lightly clamps down before the Spino pushes him away.

Quote from: Dovahkiin on Jan 15, 2013, 03:07:30 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Jan 15, 2013, 03:03:48 AM
Movie magic. It would have sucked worse had they used T-Rex as the main Dino Baddie.
Could not disagree with you more.
In with the old out with the new. I wonder who the main baddie will be in the fourth one.

That's the thing. T.Rex never really bit down lightly. If it was fighting a rival carnivore, it would surely clamp down full power to crush it's neck. Plus, T.Rex pushes the thing into the ground after biting it. I would think that is after applying full bite force. f**king hollywood and their bullshit.

As for who is going to be the Logosaurus in IV...well, you guys know who I think it should be.

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages2.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20120704173627%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2F1%2F12%2FJurassic-park1-1-.jpg&hash=00c05f78bbd13a634442a30f442e9c1efe5ee6da)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 15, 2013, 03:24:26 AM
I'd rather the Raptor be the Logosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jan 15, 2013, 03:27:48 AM
As long as they have Tyrannosaurus actually return and be the badass everyone knows it is, I'm fine.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jan 15, 2013, 03:28:33 AM
Unless it's a dinosaur that actually could realistically take down a Tyrannosaurus, I don't really want anything but the Rex in the Logo.


Unless, of course...

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc05.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2Ff%2F2011%2F056%2F1%2F9%2Fjurassic_park_carnotaurus_logo_by_onipunisher-d3acfpf.gif&hash=7c24bcd380ed52bdde0c8bd2713c5c6c28e2c004)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jan 15, 2013, 03:32:29 AM
Dude! Carnotaurus would have been nothing to a Tyrannosaur! C'mon, now!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jan 15, 2013, 03:34:30 AM
I didn't mean it in a "Carno can totally kick Rexes ass"

I meant it in a "It would be great to see TLWBook version of Carnotaurus as the baddie in the film"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jan 15, 2013, 03:35:58 AM
I guess so, but people are gonna expect T.Rex to be the logosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jan 15, 2013, 03:38:12 AM
Honestly, I don't think the logo matters.

Everyone knows the Raptors always tend to be pretty main antagonists. The only exception really was TLW, that was much more Rex focused. Then again, with raptors as stupid as those, it almost had to be.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 15, 2013, 03:51:14 AM
Both T. Rex and the Velociraptors are overused. Gimme something new.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jan 15, 2013, 03:53:54 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jan 15, 2013, 03:51:14 AM
Both T. Rex and the Velociraptors are overused. Gimme something new.
They tried and everyone hated the Spinosaurus
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jan 15, 2013, 04:07:56 AM
eh. I liked the Spinosaurus.

Wishlist - Pliosaurus, Giganotosaurus, Carnotaurus, Quetzalcoatlus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 15, 2013, 04:09:41 AM
I don't know why, but I always liked Protoceratops as a kid. Give one of them a cameo. Just 'cause.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jan 15, 2013, 04:10:55 AM
Wishlist: Albertosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 15, 2013, 04:19:29 AM
Wishlist: Carnotaurus (Novel version), Baryonyx, Therizinosaurus, Mamenchisaurus, More Dilophosaurs, Utahraptor (possibly with feathers)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jan 15, 2013, 04:20:45 AM
Baryonyx. Yesh.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 15, 2013, 04:35:48 AM
Baryonix is like Spinosaurus without the sail...won't it still be the same?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jan 15, 2013, 04:42:57 AM
Not a dino but... Sarcosuchus imperator. bring it.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.staabstudios.com%2Fsarcbig.jpg&hash=97e2c51148e40a0fa0a591e56ca46640d499cf74)

+ i allways wanted a Dimetrodon... :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jan 15, 2013, 05:00:06 AM
Gojirasaurus.

Cause what is there to not love about a dinosaur named after Godzilla?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Jan 15, 2013, 05:25:04 AM
Carnotaurus from the novel, Troodons from the JP game, and more raptors
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 15, 2013, 05:28:54 AM
I just remember the last time we had raptors...

Spoiler
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6s9sjPzyQjk#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6s9sjPzyQjk#ws)
[close]

ALAN
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jan 15, 2013, 05:30:40 AM
A       L       A       N
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 15, 2013, 05:34:23 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jan 15, 2013, 03:53:54 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jan 15, 2013, 03:51:14 AM
Both T. Rex and the Velociraptors are overused. Gimme something new.
They tried and everyone hated the Spinosaurus

Spinosaurus was a great idea, but killing the Rex off was stupid. Heck, I'm not even sure it was totally necessary.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 15, 2013, 05:35:30 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 15, 2013, 05:34:23 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jan 15, 2013, 03:53:54 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jan 15, 2013, 03:51:14 AM
Both T. Rex and the Velociraptors are overused. Gimme something new.
They tried and everyone hated the Spinosaurus

Spinosaurus was a great idea, but killing the Rex off was stupid. Heck, I'm not even sure it was totally necessary.

It was kind of a random scene as well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 15, 2013, 05:39:17 AM
I wouldn't say it was random but it was too scene and too cheap.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 15, 2013, 05:41:26 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 15, 2013, 05:39:17 AM
I wouldn't say it was random but it was too scene and too cheap.

What I meant was that the Rex just kind of shows up out of the blue just tot get killed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jan 15, 2013, 05:57:10 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jan 15, 2013, 05:28:54 AM
I just remember the last time we had raptors...

Spoiler
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6s9sjPzyQjk#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6s9sjPzyQjk#ws)
[close]

ALAN

Am I the only one who actually liked that scene?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 15, 2013, 05:59:24 AM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Jan 15, 2013, 05:57:10 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jan 15, 2013, 05:28:54 AM
I just remember the last time we had raptors...

Spoiler
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6s9sjPzyQjk#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6s9sjPzyQjk#ws)
[close]

ALAN

Am I the only one who actually liked that scene?

I think it's good for a laugh.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Jan 15, 2013, 06:24:24 AM
How can this franchise carry on? more dino's are created, get loose, eat lots of people, the world slowly creeps towards a new age of dinosaurs, the end.

I'm sure the CGI will be lovely.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 15, 2013, 06:34:05 AM
"Universal, will find a way."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 15, 2013, 10:05:32 AM
Quote from: Hubbs on Jan 15, 2013, 06:24:24 AMHow can this franchise carry on?

With a good and different script. Let's wait and see.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jan 15, 2013, 10:19:11 AM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Jan 15, 2013, 03:05:29 AM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Jan 15, 2013, 02:57:17 AM
Actually... in reality Spino is believed to have been more frail in comparison to T-rex.

Yep, Spinosaurus ever since Jurassic Park III has been exaggerated in popular media to ridiculous levels.

Planet Dinosaur so far is the only series to portray (that I know of) what most scientist deduce Spinosaurus was actually like. A fish eating scavenger that once met with a dinosaur made for hunting (Charcaradontosaurs, can't remember the spelling atm) would have only two choices: fight back (which it was not good at it since it was adapted for eating fish and dead animals) or run away, which would be the sensible solution.

Raw mass would make Spinosaurus something not to be trifled with (if size estimates are accurate - which they may not be as we have very few remains to go by), and probably capable of outmuscling other predators in a struggle. I'd imagine it would be like when a bear encounters a tiger - they back off and go their separate ways, too great a risk of injury to both parties.
Still, Tyrannosaurus isn't your average predator, and with that bite it has a ridiculous weapon that marginalises the muscular advantage of larger animals (Tyrannosaurus' preferred prey included Triceratops which grew larger than itself, and was an incredibly powerful animal). It's perfectly adapted for winning any territorial dispute, nothing is going to fight an adult rex if it can possibly avoid it.

Quote from: KiramidHead on Jan 15, 2013, 03:51:14 AM
Both T. Rex and the Velociraptors are overused. Gimme something new.

Agreed. I also thought it was dumb to use Spinosaurus in more or less the same way as a Tyrannosaurus. The original idea of Baryonyx being the main enemy raised a more novel situation, of something larger and more powerful than the raptors, but small and lithe enough that it would be very difficult to escape from.
Anyway, there are over 700 known genera of dinosaur, so why stick with the same handful? Replace Velociraptor with Liliensternus or a horde of Coelophysis and you're introducing millions of people to something new. Velociraptor and Dilophosaurus went from little-known to household names thanks to Jurassic Park (though both of them were grossly misrepresented...), it would be nice to throw that effect onto others.

One other thing I'd love to see in a new JP (though I'll repeat the main thing needs to be a grounding in deeper issues and cutting edge theory/science)... proper predatory behaviour among the dinosaurs. Tyrannosaurus hunting the Gallimimus in the first film was a tremendous scene, and helped reinforce that they're animals rather than B-movie monsters. Haven't seen much of that since then...

:Edit: Or even some other natural behaviour. The Gigantoraptor courting displays in Planet Dinosaur were rather hilarious, and there's a sequence in Crichton's first JP book in which the dilophosaurs court by the river. Could be an opportunity to showcase an unusual herbivore.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jan 15, 2013, 12:42:46 PM
I demand to see a Charcharodontosaurus take down a Brachiosaur or a diplodicus
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jan 15, 2013, 12:53:40 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 15, 2013, 05:34:23 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jan 15, 2013, 03:53:54 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jan 15, 2013, 03:51:14 AM
Both T. Rex and the Velociraptors are overused. Gimme something new.
They tried and everyone hated the Spinosaurus

Spinosaurus was a great idea, but killing the Rex off was stupid. Heck, I'm not even sure it was totally necessary.

What would have made the movie a thousand times better:

Spoiler
Spino and T.Rex fight the first time. Ends up a draw and both carnivores flee. The group ends up running from T.Rex and Spino at different times for the rest of the movie. Then, at the end, when the Spino is attacking the boat, T. Rex comes in and they have an epic duel in the water, which T.Rex emerges from the victor. The group escapes while T.Rex roars triumphantly.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 15, 2013, 01:32:08 PM
That sounds too much like the Jurassic Park ending.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jan 15, 2013, 01:41:11 PM
It would still kick wholesale ass. At least to me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 15, 2013, 01:46:24 PM
Would be better if they simply cut the fight whilst the two Dinosaurs were duking it out... leave ambiguous who won. They don't necessarily have to kill each other.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jan 15, 2013, 01:52:28 PM
That could have worked...

Spoiler
But then TREX comes back at the end!!!  :D
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Jan 15, 2013, 01:56:14 PM
If there's any dinosaur I want to see making a comeback for JP4, it's the Dilophosaurus.

Maybe this time fully grown? ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 15, 2013, 02:07:42 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Jan 15, 2013, 01:56:14 PM
If there's any dinosaur I want to see making a comeback for JP4, it's the Dilophosaurus.

Maybe this time fully grown? ;D
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.creativeuncut.com%2Fgallery-09%2Fart%2Ftrk-dilophosaurus-feeding-ground.jpg&hash=3e1893e2a63cbed802d6ada105eba4c8de7738b8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Jan 15, 2013, 04:00:05 PM
So you just wanna see dino's fight?  :o sounds like 'Primal Rage' to me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 15, 2013, 04:30:09 PM
Quote from: Hubbs on Jan 15, 2013, 04:00:05 PM
So you just wanna see dino's fight?  :o sounds like 'Primal Rage' to me.

No one said "we just wanna see dino's fight", we are simply having a discussion on dinosaurs and who would win.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Jan 15, 2013, 04:44:23 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 15, 2013, 01:46:24 PM
Would be better if they simply cut the fight whilst the two Dinosaurs were duking it out... leave ambiguous who won. They don't necessarily have to kill each other.

.... say what?  :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 15, 2013, 05:47:29 PM
Quote from: Hubbs on Jan 15, 2013, 04:00:05 PM
So you just wanna see dino's fight?  :o sounds like 'Primal Rage' to me.

They aren't flying through the air performing kicks or jumping biting attacks...

Quote from: Dovahkiin on Jan 15, 2013, 12:53:40 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 15, 2013, 05:34:23 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jan 15, 2013, 03:53:54 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jan 15, 2013, 03:51:14 AM
Both T. Rex and the Velociraptors are overused. Gimme something new.
They tried and everyone hated the Spinosaurus

Spinosaurus was a great idea, but killing the Rex off was stupid. Heck, I'm not even sure it was totally necessary.

What would have made the movie a thousand times better:

Spoiler
Spino and T.Rex fight the first time. Ends up a draw and both carnivores flee. The group ends up running from T.Rex and Spino at different times for the rest of the movie. Then, at the end, when the Spino is attacking the boat, T. Rex comes in and they have an epic duel in the water, which T.Rex emerges from the victor. The group escapes while T.Rex roars triumphantly.
[close]

Yup, I agree entirely. I have argued the same thing in the past.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jan 15, 2013, 06:07:09 PM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Jan 14, 2013, 08:38:14 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 14, 2013, 08:26:07 PM
Agreed. He sure knows how to create atmosphere, and that's really evident in the film.

Pteranodon scene.

http://gifsoup.com/webroot/animatedgifs1/1132940_o.gif

This is one of the reasons I want full CGI, clunky animatronics don't do it for me anymore

I would love to see a teaser attached to the rerelease of JP, like they did with The Lost World, it had more atmosphere than the movie itself

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUeXXnmVDN0# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUeXXnmVDN0#)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jan 15, 2013, 06:36:12 PM
I hope we get practical effects for the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 15, 2013, 07:03:43 PM
http://ca.ign.com/articles/2013/01/15/jurassic-park-iv-what-we-want (http://ca.ign.com/articles/2013/01/15/jurassic-park-iv-what-we-want)

I so want to see Goldblum and Neil on-screen together again. They have terrific chemistry.

"You married?"
"Occasionally. Yeah, I'm always on the lookout for a future ex-Ms. Malcolm"

"..."
"Hehe. Arrrhehehe".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 15, 2013, 07:06:34 PM
Hell yes.

Damn Universal for waiting too long. I hope they bring them back.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Jan 15, 2013, 07:13:16 PM
Yup, I wouldn't mind Grant and Ian back together again. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Eva on Jan 15, 2013, 07:24:06 PM
Watching the first one tonight in HD. :)

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 15, 2013, 07:03:43 PM
I so want to see Goldblum and Neil on-screen together again. They have terrific chemistry.
They do. But there has to be a limit as to how many times the same bat-shit crazy thing can happen to the same persons... Oh wait -

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Flatino-review.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F12%2FDie-Hard-5.jpg&hash=41f5332b2c39238fb9079a22552735f9e12cfbe4)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 15, 2013, 08:14:14 PM
It'll only work if Goldblum isn't as obviously disinterested as he was in TLW. "Sar-uuuuuh."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 15, 2013, 08:24:55 PM
Both actors aren't busy right now, really hope they sign on. Wouldn't want Shia LaBeouf in this film since he's Spielberg's buddy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 15, 2013, 08:25:47 PM
Sattler's son all grown up.
Twice as fast because he has INGEN GENES. Cue in evil plan from Sattler's husband. HE'S BEHIND THE DINO-SOLDIER SHIT.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 15, 2013, 08:36:22 PM
I'd say bring back Tim:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.starscolor.com%2Fimages%2Fjoseph-mazzello-03.jpg&hash=7f96591fa0d8ad531ae644c906c8692ef34b314e)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Jan 15, 2013, 08:41:41 PM
Wouldn't mind that at all. He's really matured as an actor. See The Pacific.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jan 15, 2013, 08:44:13 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Jan 15, 2013, 08:36:22 PM
I'd say bring back Tim:

http://www.starscolor.com/images/joseph-mazzello-03.jpg
Unf, me too >:]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 15, 2013, 08:46:50 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Jan 15, 2013, 08:41:41 PM
Wouldn't mind that at all. He's really matured as an actor. See The Pacific.
He was great in that,a dn he'll appear in Justified.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jan 15, 2013, 08:56:25 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 15, 2013, 08:25:47 PM
Cue in evil plan from Sattler's husband. HE'S BEHIND THE DINO-SOLDIER SHIT.

Every time someone mocks the dino-soldier script... a kitten dies. Do you hate kittens, OG? Do you?

Spoiler
:laugh:
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jan 15, 2013, 09:01:53 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Jan 15, 2013, 08:56:25 PM
Every time someone mocks the dino-soldier script... a kitten dies. Do you hate kittens, OG? Do you?
I do.  >:(

Though I kinda wish that idiotic script was being made -- it would be the grandest franchise killer in movie history :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 15, 2013, 09:03:34 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 15, 2013, 09:01:53 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Jan 15, 2013, 08:56:25 PM
Every time someone mocks the dino-soldier script... a kitten dies. Do you hate kittens, OG? Do you?
I do.  >:(

Though I kinda wish that idiotic script was being made -- it would be the grandest franchise killer in movie history :laugh:
Think of awesome it would be to see this:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsuptg.thisisnotatrueending.com%2Farchive%2F3512990%2Fimages%2F1232878503893.jpg&hash=6134db9cf6692409af3384be599a3518aab653aa)


Dino D-Day needs to be made into a movie:
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-_Ao30MX4Uhc%2FTjHMj-3TVlI%2FAAAAAAAAAwc%2FoNzCPvkStFk%2Fs1600%2FDinoDDayRex.jpg&hash=8d76a7cea06a7944582872a8b2be6e22b6830be2)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.moddb.com%2Fimages%2Fmods%2F1%2F15%2F14128%2Fdesmatosuchus.1.jpg&hash=8ed2e74e79cae470e9a54dcfb59e639d5fa747a3)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.steampowered.com%2Fsteamcommunity%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fapps%2F70000%2F52643d3c93c12cc7a3be754fc89d9b3a7e55fab5.jpg&hash=31bf604e6b730ef76def9d0ebf19664274084b12)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.killsmedead.com%2Fxwp%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F08%2Fdinodday1.jpg&hash=58c2ddcc86d586e678b180027f48bcfdbc2051c5)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Jan 15, 2013, 09:12:42 PM
Blurghughghghg.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jan 15, 2013, 09:16:07 PM
Dino D-Day? No.


The first pic, on the other hand, I would watch the f**k out of a movie based on that.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jan 15, 2013, 09:17:57 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jan 15, 2013, 09:01:53 PM
Though I kinda wish that idiotic script was being made -- it would be the grandest franchise killer in movie history :laugh:

26 year old me says that film would probably be terribad.
11 year old me says it would be the best thing EVAAaaaa...

and this being a franchise aimed at kids...

Go for broke.
Dino's with guns, f**k yeah.
:laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jan 15, 2013, 09:18:34 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Jan 15, 2013, 09:17:57 PM
26 year old me says that film would probably be terribad.
11 year old me says it would be the best thing EVAAaaaa...

and this being a franchise aimed at kids...

Go for broke.
Dino's with guns, f**k yeah.
:laugh:
From the silver screen, straight to your Id! :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 15, 2013, 09:20:03 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Jan 15, 2013, 08:24:55 PM
Both actors aren't busy right now, really hope they sign on. Wouldn't want Shia LaBeouf in this film since he's Spielberg's buddy.
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 15, 2013, 08:25:47 PM
Sattler's son all grown up.
Twice as fast because he has INGEN GENES. Cue in evil plan from Sattler's husband. HE'S BEHIND THE DINO-SOLDIER SHIT.

Spoiler
nononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononononono!
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 15, 2013, 10:03:30 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Jan 15, 2013, 08:56:25 PM
Every time someone mocks the dino-soldier script... a kitten dies. Do you hate kittens, OG? Do you?
The only cat deserving salvation is grumpy cat!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jan 15, 2013, 10:57:15 PM
I still want to see the dino hybrid concept used on the Scy-Fy channel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 16, 2013, 12:31:25 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fearlessvampirekillers.co.uk%2Fimages%2Fjack%2Fwrapper_bg.jpg&hash=97227e695c071131b1c264cfff081fadead5def2)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 16, 2013, 04:44:48 AM
Here's a rough idea for a JPIV teaser I've made...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VS2CScrzKvI# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VS2CScrzKvI#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mike’s Monsters on Jan 16, 2013, 07:44:08 AM
First production still for JP4!!!


Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg191.imageshack.us%2Fimg191%2F3223%2F1fu0u.jpg&hash=a7c3ffdf4b6fa58244b159fb8978bf7ee4fc1017) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/191/1fu0u.jpg/)


Sorry guys... I couldn't resist.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 16, 2013, 08:27:26 AM
Spoiler
I...f**king...HATE YOU.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jan 16, 2013, 10:08:29 AM
Quote from: Mikey on Jan 16, 2013, 07:44:08 AM
First production still for JP4!!!


Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg191.imageshack.us%2Fimg191%2F3223%2F1fu0u.jpg&hash=a7c3ffdf4b6fa58244b159fb8978bf7ee4fc1017) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/191/1fu0u.jpg/)


Sorry guys... I couldn't resist.
[close]

Freaking genius.

Whoever they get to do JP4, I hope they find one of the handful of directors left on the planet who can do suspense - on top of everything else, it needs to be scary. JP3 had a couple of reasonable buildup sequences (mainly the intro of the pterosaurs, hilariously awful though the design of the creatures turned out to be), but not strong enough in my opinion. May not be a popular choice, but after Signs and The Village, personally I'd like to see Shyamalan take a crack (so long as he's not writing).
Then again, maybe I wouldn't be saying that if I'd seen his last three films...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 17, 2013, 08:12:15 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jan 16, 2013, 10:08:29 AM
Whoever they get to do JP4, I hope they find one of the handful of directors left on the planet who can do suspense - on top of everything else, it needs to be scary. JP3 had a couple of reasonable buildup sequences (mainly the intro of the pterosaurs, hilariously awful though the design of the creatures turned out to be), but not strong enough in my opinion. May not be a popular choice, but after Signs and The Village, personally I'd like to see Shyamalan take a crack (so long as he's not writing).
Then again, maybe I wouldn't be saying that if I'd seen his last three films...

Apart from finding a director who understands that JP4 needs to be suspenseful, I disagree on everything you posed. M Night Shyamalan to direct JP4? That would be an awful choice.

How is this design "hilariously awful?"

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg2.bdbphotos.com%2Fimages%2Forig%2Fj%2Fr%2Fjrcb32qakr1h1rq.jpg&hash=f9c3450a3983e0a3c8556e0fa17ea8fba3528143)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 17, 2013, 08:23:25 AM
Likely he means they're paleontologically inaccurate. For one, they have teeth whereas the real Pteranodon had none, these Pteros have a look of demonic possession on their face, and the shape of the head crest is a bit off.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jan 17, 2013, 09:27:51 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 17, 2013, 08:23:25 AM
Likely he means they're paleontologically inaccurate. For one, they have teeth whereas the real Pteranodon had none, these Pteros have a look of demonic possession on their face, and the shape of the head crest is a bit off.

Yup, all of that, particularly the "demonic look" which is just silly whether you're looking for paleontological accuracy (which is occasionally lacking even in the first film) or not. TLW's Pteranodons were beautiful, I don't know why they didn't just expand on them.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 17, 2013, 09:46:54 AM
Demonic look? Really?

I agree with the teeth though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 17, 2013, 09:57:57 AM
Look at their eyes. They look evil.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 17, 2013, 10:06:40 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 17, 2013, 09:57:57 AM
Look at their eyes. They look evil.

Many animals look evil. What's the big deal?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 17, 2013, 10:19:25 AM
Animals such as...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 17, 2013, 10:33:05 AM
These are just an example:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fassets.natgeotv.com%2FPhotos%2F17%2F44158.jpg&hash=053de9933bd10c4abf34449d2c676058da079553)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.unitedbyblue.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fshark1.jpg&hash=0d09a50fe3ddbc513b4bb9a22bc5f76550130d52)

My point is that the whole "evil-looking" deal is subjective and something imposed by men. Animals look however they're meant to look. Of course they tried to make the pteranodons a bit scary, but it doesn't stick out when you look at the fellas I posted above, which aren't animatronics for a movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jan 17, 2013, 12:35:33 PM
AND THE RAPTORS DON'T LOOK DEMONIC?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jan 17, 2013, 02:33:23 PM
Quote from: Gate on Jan 17, 2013, 12:35:33 PM
AND THE RAPTORS DON'T LOOK DEMONIC?

Nope, they look like raptors. Maybe not Velociraptor specifically, but comfortably dromaeosauridy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Never say no to Panda! on Jan 17, 2013, 02:49:32 PM
Non-demonic design:
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F24.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_lf5lszn7D01qb4c6oo1_400.jpg&hash=dc694a2b239522724591fdca30db738b34f3a17f)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jan 17, 2013, 04:09:25 PM
I never saw the Pteranodon as being Demonic in the slightest...
Quote from: Never say no to Panda! on Jan 17, 2013, 02:49:32 PM
Non-demonic design:
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lf5lszn7D01qb4c6oo1_400.jpg

I'd be much more afraid of that charging at me than I would the Rex from the first movie charging at me. Yikes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jan 17, 2013, 04:35:59 PM
Quote from: Never say no to Panda! on Jan 17, 2013, 02:49:32 PM
Non-demonic design:
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lf5lszn7D01qb4c6oo1_400.jpg

LAWL
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 17, 2013, 04:40:38 PM
Quote from: Never say no to Panda! on Jan 17, 2013, 02:49:32 PM
Non-demonic design:
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lf5lszn7D01qb4c6oo1_400.jpg

"Not the mama!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 17, 2013, 04:51:27 PM
I have never heard anything as ridiculous as the Pteranodons in JP3 looking "demonic."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 17, 2013, 06:49:12 PM
Maybe demonic was too strong a word but what I meant was, they looked very sinister which was odd. They're just animals. They're not monsters whose sole purpose in life is to cause harm to other creatures.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 17, 2013, 06:49:21 PM
Demonopteradon
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.plesiosauria.com%2Fdinotoyimage%2Fpapo_pteranodon_head.jpg&hash=a2cb2c1616734421cf14e748e733d225a52662f3)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 17, 2013, 07:32:46 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 17, 2013, 06:49:12 PM
They're just animals. They're not monsters whose sole purpose in life is to cause harm to other creatures.

To quote Alan Grant...

"What John Hammond and InGen did at Jurassic Park is create genetically engineered theme park monsters. Nothing more and nothing less."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 17, 2013, 08:28:17 PM
What, they genetically engineered them to be super vicious? Please.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jan 17, 2013, 08:33:11 PM
Not specifically, they just happened to be that way.

It was why, in the books, the pen for the creatures was closed instead of being on the tour. The creatures ended up being vicious and surprisingly territorial, attacking anyone in it. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jan 17, 2013, 11:54:44 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 17, 2013, 06:49:12 PM
Maybe demonic was too strong a word but what I meant was, they looked very sinister which was odd. They're just animals. They're not monsters whose sole purpose in life is to cause harm to other creatures.

Do you think maybe you have a thing against Pteranadons, dude?


I dunno... maybe you're a... speciest.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 18, 2013, 02:12:46 AM
I like all archosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 18, 2013, 02:21:04 PM
Shameful Sequels: Jurassic Park III (http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/videolinks/teamt/mjtv/ss/37971-shameful-sequels-jurassic-park-3)

"If they have a scene of the raptors speaking in English, I'll strangle the producers." :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 18, 2013, 06:15:10 PM
"You twats!"
"Oi Ralph, they're in here!"

Oh my God, I wasn't ready for that :D :D :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jan 19, 2013, 04:20:13 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 18, 2013, 06:15:10 PM
"You twats!"
"Oi Ralph, they're in here!"

Oh my God, I wasn't ready for that :D :D :D

Lol! I thoroughly enjoyed that and all the subtitles. xD
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 21, 2013, 01:28:03 AM
Best one I found yet..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Img88X1CQQ#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Img88X1CQQ#ws)

(https://www.stanwinstonschool.com/ckeditor_assets/pictures/497/content_jurassic_park_iii_spinosaurus_blog_1.jpg?1348943058)(https://www.stanwinstonschool.com/ckeditor_assets/pictures/499/content_jurassic_park_iii_spinosaurus_blog_3.jpg?1348943153)(https://www.stanwinstonschool.com/ckeditor_assets/%20:-%5Bpictures/500/content_jurassic_park_iii_spinosaurus_blog_4.jpg?1348943177)(https://www.stanwinstonschool.com/ckeditor_assets/pictures/501/content_jurassic_park_iii_spinosaurus_blog_5.jpg?1348943207)(https://www.stanwinstonschool.com/ckeditor_assets/pictures/502/content_jurassic_park_iii_spinosaurus_blog_7.jpg?1348943267)(https://www.stanwinstonschool.com/ckeditor_assets/pictures/505/content_jurassic_park_iii_spinosaurus_blog_12.jpg?1348943540)(https://www.stanwinstonschool.com/ckeditor_assets/pictures/506/content_jurassic_park_iii_spinosaurus_blog_16.jpg?1348943580)(https://www.stanwinstonschool.com/ckeditor_assets/pictures/507/content_jurassic_park_iii_spinosaurus_blog_18.jpg?1348943668)(https://www.stanwinstonschool.com/ckeditor_assets/pictures/508/content_jurassic_park_iii_spinosaurus_blog_21.jpg?1348943716)(https://www.stanwinstonschool.com/ckeditor_assets/pictures/509/content_jurassic_park_iii_spinosaurus_blog_19.jpg?1348943803)(https://www.stanwinstonschool.com/ckeditor_assets/pictures/510/content_jurassic_park_iii_spinosaurus_blog_20.jpg?1348943855)

Cool pic, but I don't approve...

(https://www.stanwinstonschool.com/ckeditor_assets/pictures/512/content_jurassic_park_iii_spinosaurus_blog_23.jpg?1348943905)

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages1.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20111030213248%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2F5%2F5b%2FCooper_with_a_holstered_pistol_on_his_right_thigh_before_the_Spinosaurus_grabs_him..jpg&hash=d595e8c8c14146d26d3a099afa851455b213e8c8)
[close]

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.relyonhorror.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F08%2FRexSpino22.jpg&hash=086913d9aac4ec59c6d9b349e4b7ea259be136ee)

Btw, what did you guys think of my JPIV fan teaser that I posted earlier?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 21, 2013, 01:54:27 AM
Y'know, looking at that Spino head in the stills really irks me. It's as if I'm only now realizing how poor it is.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 21, 2013, 03:26:32 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jan 21, 2013, 01:28:03 AM
Best one I found yet..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Img88X1CQQ#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Img88X1CQQ#ws)

Someone sure enjoys sucking off the T. Rex. ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DJ Pu$$yface on Jan 21, 2013, 03:54:32 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jan 21, 2013, 03:26:32 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jan 21, 2013, 01:28:03 AM
Best one I found yet..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Img88X1CQQ#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Img88X1CQQ#ws)

Someone sure enjoys sucking off the T. Rex. ::)

That spine is definitely overcompensating, T-Rex has a much bigger tool. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jan 21, 2013, 04:31:49 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jan 21, 2013, 01:28:03 AM
Best one I found yet..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Img88X1CQQ#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Img88X1CQQ#ws)

https://www.stanwinstonschool.com/ckeditor_assets/pictures/497/content_jurassic_park_iii_spinosaurus_blog_1.jpg?1348943058https://www.stanwinstonschool.com/ckeditor_assets/pictures/499/content_jurassic_park_iii_spinosaurus_blog_3.jpg?1348943153https://www.stanwinstonschool.com/ckeditor_assets/ :-[pictures/500/content_jurassic_park_iii_spinosaurus_blog_4.jpg?1348943177https://www.stanwinstonschool.com/ckeditor_assets/pictures/501/content_jurassic_park_iii_spinosaurus_blog_5.jpg?1348943207https://www.stanwinstonschool.com/ckeditor_assets/pictures/502/content_jurassic_park_iii_spinosaurus_blog_7.jpg?1348943267https://www.stanwinstonschool.com/ckeditor_assets/pictures/505/content_jurassic_park_iii_spinosaurus_blog_12.jpg?1348943540https://www.stanwinstonschool.com/ckeditor_assets/pictures/506/content_jurassic_park_iii_spinosaurus_blog_16.jpg?1348943580https://www.stanwinstonschool.com/ckeditor_assets/pictures/507/content_jurassic_park_iii_spinosaurus_blog_18.jpg?1348943668https://www.stanwinstonschool.com/ckeditor_assets/pictures/508/content_jurassic_park_iii_spinosaurus_blog_21.jpg?1348943716https://www.stanwinstonschool.com/ckeditor_assets/pictures/509/content_jurassic_park_iii_spinosaurus_blog_19.jpg?1348943803(https://www.stanwinstonschool.com/ckeditor_assets/pictures/510/content_jurassic_park_iii_spinosaurus_blog_20.jpg?1348943855)

Cool pic, but I don't approve...

https://www.stanwinstonschool.com/ckeditor_assets/pictures/512/content_jurassic_park_iii_spinosaurus_blog_23.jpg?1348943905

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages1.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20111030213248%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2F5%2F5b%2FCooper_with_a_holstered_pistol_on_his_right_thigh_before_the_Spinosaurus_grabs_him..jpg&hash=d595e8c8c14146d26d3a099afa851455b213e8c8)
[close]

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.relyonhorror.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F08%2FRexSpino22.jpg&hash=086913d9aac4ec59c6d9b349e4b7ea259be136ee)

Btw, what did you guys think of my JPIV fan teaser that I posted earlier?

Ugh...T.Rex should have won...honestly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 21, 2013, 05:57:52 AM
Keep spouting that fanboyism...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jan 21, 2013, 06:05:07 AM
I'm sure if people keep whining about it, they'll change the past and the Trex will win!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 21, 2013, 06:05:50 AM
I would like to think that most studios have more of a backbone than, say, Bioware.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 21, 2013, 06:40:01 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jan 21, 2013, 05:57:52 AM
Keep spouting that fanboyism...

Or, keep spouting that science...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jan 21, 2013, 06:42:20 AM
The Spinosaurus was actually bigger than its movie counter-part. 52 to 59 ft.

Tyrannosaurus has only been at largest 40ft.


Keep spouting that fanboyism.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 21, 2013, 06:44:31 AM
Size isn't the issue. The issue is that T.Rex had a stronger bite force.

durr
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jan 21, 2013, 06:45:22 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 21, 2013, 06:44:31 AM
Size isn't the issue. The issue is that T.Rex had a stronger bite force.

durr
have you ever tried to punch someone that is five feet taller than you?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 21, 2013, 06:50:29 AM
In the movie the Rex has Spino by the neck.

Keep at it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 21, 2013, 07:25:41 AM
Would you even care about the bite force if you weren't fawning over the T. Rex? I don't think so.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 21, 2013, 07:30:12 AM
Yeah, probably. I can't look at the Spinosaurus without getting upset about its physical design.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DJ Pu$$yface on Jan 21, 2013, 08:01:25 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jan 21, 2013, 06:45:22 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 21, 2013, 06:44:31 AM
Size isn't the issue. The issue is that T.Rex had a stronger bite force.

durr
have you ever tried to punch someone that is five feet taller than you?

Yep.

Quote from: KiramidHead on Jan 21, 2013, 07:25:41 AM
Would you even care about the bite force if you weren't fawning over the T. Rex? I don't think so.

Yep.

Size has nothing to do with it.

Spinosaurus jaws were designed for eating fish, no where near having the strength to break the neck of a Tyrannosaurus, which did indeed have the greatest jaw power of any land creature.

Yes, it is my favourite dinosaur, and yes the movie did make me a little angry when I was younger. But really, the scientific evidence supports in favor of the T-Rex.

They should have had a Triceratops vs T-Rex fight, would have been much more interesting.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 21, 2013, 08:11:14 AM
Agreed on the Rex/Trike fight.

I know it's just a movie and complaining about accuracy is fool-hardy but something that is so blatant as the Rex/Spino fight is hard to glance over. It's not like changing the look of the animal ever-so slightly to suit the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Jan 21, 2013, 08:28:52 AM
Quote from: DJ Pu$$yface on Jan 21, 2013, 08:01:25 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jan 21, 2013, 06:45:22 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 21, 2013, 06:44:31 AM
Size isn't the issue. The issue is that T.Rex had a stronger bite force.

durr
have you ever tried to punch someone that is five feet taller than you?

Yep.

Quote from: KiramidHead on Jan 21, 2013, 07:25:41 AM
Would you even care about the bite force if you weren't fawning over the T. Rex? I don't think so.

Yep.

Size has nothing to do with it.

Spinosaurus jaws were designed for eating fish, no where near having the strength to break the neck of a Tyrannosaurus, which did indeed have the greatest jaw power of any land creature.

Yes, it is my favourite dinosaur, and yes the movie did make me a little angry when I was younger. But really, the scientific evidence supports in favor of the T-Rex.

They should have had a Triceratops vs T-Rex fight, would have been much more interesting.


Spot on.


As for the size issue, thats a lot less relevant in the animal world. 30 pound honey badger chasing off a lion, Wolverines chasing off bears/wolves, American badger doing the same, etc. Counts more for humans because we're the same species - less so for animals because they have different characteristics that supersede another animals.

Such as have a far superior bite force.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: coolbreeze on Jan 21, 2013, 08:31:47 AM
Quote from: ScardyFox on Jan 21, 2013, 08:28:52 AM
Quote from: DJ Pu$$yface on Jan 21, 2013, 08:01:25 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jan 21, 2013, 06:45:22 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 21, 2013, 06:44:31 AM
Size isn't the issue. The issue is that T.Rex had a stronger bite force.

durr
have you ever tried to punch someone that is five feet taller than you?

Yep.

Quote from: KiramidHead on Jan 21, 2013, 07:25:41 AM
Would you even care about the bite force if you weren't fawning over the T. Rex? I don't think so.

Yep.

Size has nothing to do with it.

Spinosaurus jaws were designed for eating fish, no where near having the strength to break the neck of a Tyrannosaurus, which did indeed have the greatest jaw power of any land creature.

Yes, it is my favourite dinosaur, and yes the movie did make me a little angry when I was younger. But really, the scientific evidence supports in favor of the T-Rex.

They should have had a Triceratops vs T-Rex fight, would have been much more interesting.


Spot on.


As for the size issue, thats a lot less relevant in the animal world. 30 pound honey badger chasing off a lion, Wolverines chasing off bears/wolves, American badger doing the same, etc. Counts more for humans because we're the same species - less so for animals because they have different characteristics that supersede another animals.

Such as have a far superior bite force.

And Aspie has a far superior suck force?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Jan 21, 2013, 08:33:34 AM
Quote from: coolbreeze on Jan 21, 2013, 08:31:47 AM
Quote from: ScardyFox on Jan 21, 2013, 08:28:52 AM
Quote from: DJ Pu$$yface on Jan 21, 2013, 08:01:25 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jan 21, 2013, 06:45:22 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 21, 2013, 06:44:31 AM
Size isn't the issue. The issue is that T.Rex had a stronger bite force.

durr
have you ever tried to punch someone that is five feet taller than you?

Yep.

Quote from: KiramidHead on Jan 21, 2013, 07:25:41 AM
Would you even care about the bite force if you weren't fawning over the T. Rex? I don't think so.

Yep.

Size has nothing to do with it.

Spinosaurus jaws were designed for eating fish, no where near having the strength to break the neck of a Tyrannosaurus, which did indeed have the greatest jaw power of any land creature.

Yes, it is my favourite dinosaur, and yes the movie did make me a little angry when I was younger. But really, the scientific evidence supports in favor of the T-Rex.

They should have had a Triceratops vs T-Rex fight, would have been much more interesting.


Spot on.


As for the size issue, thats a lot less relevant in the animal world. 30 pound honey badger chasing off a lion, Wolverines chasing off bears/wolves, American badger doing the same, etc. Counts more for humans because we're the same species - less so for animals because they have different characteristics that supersede another animals.

Such as have a far superior bite force.

And Aspie has a far superior suck force?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lf_KrGP61uo# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lf_KrGP61uo#)

Spoiler
:laugh:
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Jan 21, 2013, 12:44:30 PM
I was pissed when the Spinosaurus killed my favorite dinosaur from the previous two movies. If that makes me a fanboy, then yeah, no shit I'm a fan boy.

At least build up to a fight, instead of just killing off the Tyrannosaur right when they get to the island. Pacing was a big issue for me in that movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 21, 2013, 02:10:48 PM
I didn't mind the Tyrannosaurus dying because I assume its the young Rex seen in TLW, which doesn't bother me. The other two adult Rex's should still be alive. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jan 21, 2013, 02:59:54 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jan 21, 2013, 05:57:52 AM
Keep spouting that fanboyism...

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 21, 2013, 06:40:01 AM

Or, keep spouting that science...

What I was just about to say. Try doing a little research on the feeding habits of the two carnivores, KiramidHead. You might just learn something.  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 21, 2013, 05:25:25 PM
The thing about this is, however, that Jurassic Park never was a series with all scientific facts straight. Yes, it was the first film with mostly anatomically correct Dinosaurs. However, the first film alone, for example, had a Dilophosaurus with a completely fictional neck frill (without considering the Utahraptor/Deinonychus/Velociraptor issue); the second had a questionably powerful Triceratops; and that's not all of it in the very least.

Resorting to Scientific facts and how things actually are in the specific case of the third film, as an argument, is devoid of actual use. The first film did not pose the question of whether it should have its liberties or not; it just did. Why should the third film consider something that its predecessors did not?

Narrative over Scientific fact. Same concept.

Yes, they've changed the Raptor design, making it closer to more recent theories; Horner however went "I AM SCIENCE" mode, during the production of the first film, only when it was about Raptors using their tongues like Lizards or Snakes. Otherwise he let the guys put a frilled Dilophosaurus -- and in the third film itself, he allowed toothed Pteranodons.

The problem in this case arises because it is about the Tyrannosaurus -- fan favourite of just about everyone, myself included -- being killed by another Dinosaur. It is completely ok not to be really happy about it. I myself am not, and would enjoy the third film way more had it not happened.

What you can question is the intention behind the infamous fight. Narratively, the purpose of the scene was to show that the Spinosaurus is the brand new badass villain. To achieve this, they made it brutally defeat the former 'Dragon'. They could've done that a countless other ways, but they chose that [maybe because Horner has a particular resentment towards Tyrannosaurus; I don't want to know]. That can be legitimately criticized. Scientifically inaccurate? I've already covered that. It's a senseless criticism.

Besides the fact that you can get away with all of the inaccuracies by just saying the Dinosaurs are mutants. Just like in the book (which is something that most critics don't get: the Dilophosaurus has venom because it's a freaking mutant with reptile and amphibian DNA).

And in this particular case, you could also theorize that this particular T.Rex had some kind of anatomic imperfection, perhaps it had weak jaw muscles, or what have you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 21, 2013, 06:10:02 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 21, 2013, 05:25:25 PM
The thing about this is, however, that Jurassic Park never was a series with all scientific facts straight. Yes, it was the first film with mostly anatomically correct Dinosaurs. However, the first film alone, for example, had a Dilophosaurus with a completely fictional neck frill (without considering the Utahraptor/Deinonychus/Velociraptor issue); the second had a questionably powerful Triceratops; and that's not all of it in the very least.

Not really, it only had anatomically dinosaurs relative to other dinosaur movies. The dinos in JP are anything but anatomically correct. As for the second film and its Trike, how do you mean questionably powerful?

Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 21, 2013, 05:25:25 PM
Resorting to Scientific facts and how things actually are in the specific case of the third film, as an argument, is devoid of actual use. The first film did not pose the question of whether it should have its liberties or not; it just did. Why should the third film consider something that its predecessors did not?

I still question the scientific validity of the first film, but because the overall package is excellent, I don't get as uppity about it. Doesn't help the third film when it sucks so much.

Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 21, 2013, 05:25:25 PMYes, they've changed the Raptor design, making it closer to more recent theories; Horner however went "I AM SCIENCE" mode, during the production of the first film, only when it was about Raptors using their tongues like Lizards or Snakes. Otherwise he let the guys put a frilled Dilophosaurus -- and in the third film itself, he allowed toothed Pteranodons.

The toothed Pteranodons bug the heck out of me, as I made it clear on the previous page I think it was.

Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 21, 2013, 05:25:25 PM
What you can question is the intention behind the infamous fight. Narratively, the purpose of the scene was to show that the Spinosaurus is the brand new badass villain. To achieve this, they made it brutally defeat the former 'Dragon'. They could've done that a countless other ways, but they chose that [maybe because Horner has a particular resentment towards Tyrannosaurus; I don't want to know]. That can be legitimately criticized. Scientifically inaccurate? I've already covered that. It's a senseless criticism.

He does. He actually went on record once (damned if I can find the quote right now though) and said he hates T.Rex and refuses to accept that it was a legitimate hunter.

Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 21, 2013, 05:25:25 PM
And in this particular case, you could also theorize that this particular T.Rex had some kind of anatomic imperfection, perhaps it had weak jaw muscles, or what have you.

That's a real stretch. Yes you can argue all dinosaurs in the film were genetically engineered for obvious reasons, but the above I have a hard time buying.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 21, 2013, 06:24:33 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 21, 2013, 06:10:02 PM
Not really, it only had anatomically dinosaurs relative to other dinosaur movies.
Which is why I said 'mostly'.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 21, 2013, 06:10:02 PM
As for the second film and its Trike, how do you mean questionably powerful?
It threw the jeep on that tree.

Unless I don't remember correctly and it was something else.

In that case shame on me for not remembering something from one of the films I am most affectioned to. The Lost World, mind you. Goodness.   :-[

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 21, 2013, 06:10:02 PM
I still question the scientific validity of the first film, but because the overall package is excellent, I don't get as uppity about it. Doesn't help the third film when it sucks so much.
The third film may suck, but that really shouldn't come into matter. Fact is, it had all the rights to narratively do what it wanted without having accuracy as a restraint. We may question the necessity for it, which is right about zero (since the same effect could have been achieved with other narrative devices), but we cannot say it sucks because it's scientifically wrong or unlikely.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 21, 2013, 06:10:02 PM
He does. He actually went on record once (damned if I can find the quote right now though) and said he hates T.Rex and refuses to accept that it was a legitimate hunter.
:laugh:

Holy shit and he's the Paleontological supervisor for all three films. This paired with the stuff he says on the behind the scenes featurettes about a carnivore's length being directly proportional to its savagery is right about spectacular.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 21, 2013, 06:10:02 PM
That's a real stretch. Yes you can argue all dinosaurs in the film were genetically engineered for obvious reasons, but the above I have a hard time buying.
Best I can offer. It's that or Super-Necked Spinosaurus really. Which would be sillier.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jan 21, 2013, 06:28:27 PM
Sorry for the multi-quote post. I'm not trying to be combative or anything, Omega just made a very good and broad-ranging post.

Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 21, 2013, 05:25:25 PM
The thing about this is, however, that Jurassic Park never was a series with all scientific facts straight. Yes, it was the first film with mostly anatomically correct Dinosaurs. However, the first film alone, for example, had a Dilophosaurus with a completely fictional neck frill (without considering the Utahraptor/Deinonychus/Velociraptor issue); the second had a questionably powerful Triceratops; and that's not all of it in the very least.

Part of the explanation for Dilophosaurus' frill is that many dinosaurs will have had ornamentations we have no idea about, which are too fleshy or delicate to survive the fossilisation process. Anyone digging us up in the future probably wouldn't realise we have ears or fingernails, for example (or that my genitals are so unfeasibly vast). Dilophosaurus, being an apex predator, had about as much use for a frill as a tiger has for a purple mohawk, but it raises the point and makes you think.
Dilophosaurus was one of the more unusually-adorned dinosaurs known at the time, so there's some sense to the choice.
What does bother me enormously about that sequence in Jurassic Park is the baby dinosaur attacking and killing something three times larger than itself... But that goes back to your point about how the series has played fast and loose with scientific accuracy from the outset.

May I ask what you mean by the questionably powerful Triceratops? It was a ridiculously muscular and heavily-built animal. I'm having trouble remembering that part of TLW though.
:edit: Oh, are you talking about how that car is mysteriously thrown up a hill to the tall tree Roland and Ajay are hiding in? Questionable is certainly the word there.
:Edit: I edited that before the final edit. Just for the record. Edd... it. Ed-eet? Weird word.

Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 21, 2013, 05:25:25 PM
Yes, they've changed the Raptor design, making it closer to more recent theories; Horner however went "I AM SCIENCE" mode, during the production of the first film, only when it was about Raptors using their tongues like Lizards or Snakes. Otherwise he let the guys put a frilled Dilophosaurus -- and in the third film itself, he allowed toothed Pteranodons.

The weird thing about the JP3 raptor redesign was that it wasn't remotely based on any evidence - it was like someone had heard "dromaeosaurids had feathers!" and imagined how that might look. I think we had a pretty good idea of raptor feather configurations at the time, yet it wasn't used for the film. I will say though that I'm mildly skeptical of Utahraptor/Achillobator-sized coelurosaurs being fully feathered in warm climates.

As for JP3, I vaguely remember Jack Horner disavowing the production at some point. Not sure how much influence he had on that one (I might be thinking of TLW, which had its fair share of head-scratchers too).
Not that Horner is an entirely positive exerter of influence anyway... he's done a hell of a lot to advance the science, and he's remained an interesting discussion-provoker throughout his life, but I often get the impression he likes to be controversial for the sake of it, and he's occasionally proven not to be sufficiently au fait with extant animal behaviour (which is probably how the monstrously predatory baby Dilophosaurus got in there...).

Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 21, 2013, 05:25:25 PM
Besides the fact that you can get away with all of the inaccuracies by just saying the Dinosaurs are mutants. Just like in the book (which is something that most critics don't get: the Dilophosaurus has venom because it's a freaking mutant with reptile and amphibian DNA).

That's more something which has been used as an excuse after the fact. The only things I can think of which were written as mutations were the changing genders, and lab-grown raptors being unable to change colour (and even the latter wasn't explicitly stated as such, I'm making the assumption).
Dilophosaurs were written as venomous because at the time, it was believed their jaws were too weak to have been useful killing tools (and they did have very long upper teeth); it's another example of something that wouldn't have fossilised (though NOW we do have possible evidence of a venomous dinosaur in Sinornithosaurus).

I think someone earlier in the thread mentioned the unexpected Cearadactyl aggression in regards to mutation, that's an example of Crichton making the point that we'd NEVER know exactly what to expect from extinct lifeforms. There would always be surprises.
The other 'mutation' that gets thrown around a lot is the rex's amphibian vision; that was actually a consequence of very early attempts at reconstructing dinosaur braincases. They somehow managed to produce data that large dinosaurs' senses would have functioned similar to amphibians' (ironic given that Tyrannosaurus has since been indicated to have had one of the best batteries of senses of any land animal). Crichton loved to stuff his books with the very most cutting-edge science and theory (particularly Jurassic Park), unfortunately a lot of it has since been disproven. That's the cutting edge for you, I guess.


:Edit: Gah, Ninja'd. Well I'm not editing it, it's a long arse bloody post.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 21, 2013, 06:47:39 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jan 21, 2013, 06:28:27 PM
Part of the explanation for Dilophosaurus' frill is that many dinosaurs will have had ornamentations we have no idea about, which are too fleshy or delicate to survive the fossilisation process.
Absolutely, but a frill is completely speculative.
As would be, say, very resistant Spinosaurus skin.

Mind you I am not complaining about it in the very least. I love the frilled Dilophosaurus and I love how it plays out in the film.

Quote from: Vertigo on Jan 21, 2013, 06:28:27 PM
What does bother me enormously about that sequence in Jurassic Park is the baby dinosaur attacking and killing something three times larger than itself... But that goes back to your point about how the series has played fast and loose with scientific accuracy from the outset.
Doesn't bother me at all, in-keeping that I consider all of them mutant Dinosaurs fundamentally (they inherited the ability to change sex from the frog DNA; no reason to think that, or the incomplete DNA by itself affected them, atavically speaking). Pretty brave indeed for a youngling. But, as you say... played it fast and loose.

Quote from: Vertigo on Jan 21, 2013, 06:28:27 PM
:edit: Oh, are you talking about how that car is mysteriously thrown up a hill to the tall tree Roland and Ajay are hiding in? Questionable is certainly the word there.
Well yes, I remember that it threw the car up there.

Unless it was the Pachy. That pesky Pachy.

Quote from: Vertigo on Jan 21, 2013, 06:28:27 PM
The weird thing about the JP3 raptor redesign was that it wasn't remotely based on any evidence - it was like someone had heard "dromaeosaurids had feathers!" and imagined how that might look. I think we had a pretty good idea of raptor feather configurations at the time, yet it wasn't used for the film. I will say though that I'm mildly skeptical of Utahraptor/Achillobator-sized coelurosaurs being fully feathered in warm climates.
Agreed 100%.
Yes also on the Utahraptor/Achillobator part. Which would apply to bigger theropods too.

Quote from: Vertigo on Jan 21, 2013, 06:28:27 PM
but I often get the impression he likes to be controversial for the sake of it,
:laugh: I somehow do too.

Quote from: Vertigo on Jan 21, 2013, 06:28:27 PM
That's more something which has been used as an excuse after the fact. The only things I can think of which were written as mutations were the changing genders, and lab-grown raptors being unable to change colour (and even the latter wasn't explicitly stated as such, I'm making the assumption).
I also remember the 'Compies' having 'five-fingered hands that made them very human-like', or something like that. Unless the translator [I read the italian translation] f**ked shit up.

Plus there was, I think, a discussion -- between Hammond and Wu? I don't remember -- about how they could possibly modify further their Dinosaurs, since they were already not exact reproductions of the extinct animals.

Quote from: Vertigo on Jan 21, 2013, 06:28:27 PM
Dilophosaurs were written as venomous because at the time, it was believed their jaws were too weak to have been useful killing tools (and they did have very long upper teeth); it's another example of something that wouldn't have fossilised (though NOW we do have possible evidence of a venomous dinosaur in Sinornithosaurus).
Oh yes. :) Sorry, used the wrong example.

Quote from: Vertigo on Jan 21, 2013, 06:28:27 PMCrichton loved to stuff his books with the very most cutting-edge science and theory (particularly Jurassic Park), unfortunately a lot of it has since been disproven. That's the cutting edge for you, I guess.
Yup! Also the reason he used the Velociraptor antirrhopus classification, no?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jan 21, 2013, 07:25:17 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 21, 2013, 06:47:39 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jan 21, 2013, 06:28:27 PM
That's more something which has been used as an excuse after the fact. The only things I can think of which were written as mutations were the changing genders, and lab-grown raptors being unable to change colour (and even the latter wasn't explicitly stated as such, I'm making the assumption).
I also remember the 'Compies' having 'five-fingered hands that made them very human-like', or something like that. Unless the translator [I read the italian translation] f**ked shit up.

Plus there was, I think, a discussion -- between Hammond and Wu? I don't remember -- about how they could possibly modify further their Dinosaurs, since they were already not exact reproductions of the extinct animals.

They way I remember it was that the compies were described as having three-toed, bird-like feet, with the emphasis on the bird similarity as that was still a highly controversial subject (despite poor John Ostrom arguing for it for twenty years). I don't remember a human similarity being mentioned, and I don't remember a description of their hands (though that could be my memory at fault).

With the latter part, the point in that chapter was that they'd re-created the actual animals, and Wu wanted to modify them; Hammond was against it. I'd imagine he regretted that.

Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 21, 2013, 06:47:39 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jan 21, 2013, 06:28:27 PMCrichton loved to stuff his books with the very most cutting-edge science and theory (particularly Jurassic Park), unfortunately a lot of it has since been disproven. That's the cutting edge for you, I guess.
Yup! Also the reason he used the Velociraptor Antirrhopus classification, no?

Exactly. Gregory Paul (whose book I'm reading at the moment, it's tremendous - though unsurprisingly he's with Horner on the synonymising of Triceratops and Torosaurus, and gets a bit frothy-mouthed on the subject of taxonomy) and a couple of other researchers theorised that Deinonychus antirrhopus and Velociraptor mongoliensis represented species of the same genus shortly before Crichton wrote the book (using the latter name as it was discovered first, though Deinonychus was the more popularly-known and scientifically important taxon).

I assume they didn't have much evidence of Deinonychus' skull at the time, because it really should have been immediately obvious that they were totally different creatures... Not to mention that they inhabited separate continents, which didn't have a large or long-term connection at the time as far as I know. Needless to say, it was debunked very quickly.

Another point about Deinonychus is that we used to think it was a lot taller than it actually was, its legs turned out to be surprisingly short. Still had the mass and tools to be one hell of a predator though, and was almost certainly a pack hunter in my opinion.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Jan 21, 2013, 07:38:26 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 21, 2013, 06:10:02 PM

He does. He actually went on record once (damned if I can find the quote right now though) and said he hates T.Rex and refuses to accept that it was a legitimate hunter.


Once, he's said that many times. It makes me wonder though if he still holds onto that assertion after all the evidence that has come out in the past decade.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 21, 2013, 07:55:10 PM
Vertigo;

Checked and it seems that the original version (http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/jurassicpark/section5.rhtml) (summed up in the link) also features the five-fingered Compys.

About the Hammond-Wu discussion, that was my memory being faulty. Again. Yesss.

Regarding the Deinonychus skull issue instead; I remember that in the 60s-70s the only had parts (postorbital I think) of the skull available, but have no idea when a complete or almost-complete skull was discovered.

Are you reading The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs? or is it another book I am not aware of?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 21, 2013, 07:58:55 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 21, 2013, 06:24:33 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 21, 2013, 06:10:02 PM
As for the second film and its Trike, how do you mean questionably powerful?
It threw the jeep on that tree.

Unless I don't remember correctly and it was something else.

In that case shame on me for not remembering something from one of the films I am most affectioned to. The Lost World, mind you. Goodness.   :-[

Is that what it was? I always thought it was explosion that sent it flying. We see the Trike plow through the jeep initially but never actually toss it in the air.

Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 21, 2013, 06:24:33 PM
:laugh:

Holy shit and he's the Paleontological supervisor for all three films. This paired with the stuff he says on the behind the scenes featurettes about a carnivore's length being directly proportional to its savagery is right about spectacular.


Quote from: ScardyFox on Jan 21, 2013, 07:38:26 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 21, 2013, 06:10:02 PM

He does. He actually went on record once (damned if I can find the quote right now though) and said he hates T.Rex and refuses to accept that it was a legitimate hunter.


Once, he's said that many times. It makes me wonder though if he still holds onto that assertion after all the evidence that has come out in the past decade.

I think he's re-evaluated his position. When I attended a symposium he led a few years back, his words were, "I think T.Rex was an opportunistic animal".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 21, 2013, 08:04:23 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 21, 2013, 07:58:55 PM
Is that what it was? I always thought it was explosion that sent it flying. We see the Trike plow through the jeep initially but never actually toss it in the air.
Wouldn't the explosion have torn it apart?

Bah! An excuse to rewatch the film though. ;)

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 21, 2013, 07:58:55 PM
"I think T.Rex was an opportunistic animal".
Interesting. I think lemons are yellow!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Jan 21, 2013, 08:06:06 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 21, 2013, 07:58:55 PM
I think he's re-evaluated his position. When I attended a symposium he led a few years back, his words were, "I think T.Rex was an opportunistic animal".

Thats pretty big for him. It honestly is. Though I doubt he will ever come right out and say it after saying T Rex was just a lowly scavenger for so many decades.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jan 21, 2013, 08:21:17 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 21, 2013, 07:55:10 PM
Vertigo;

Are you reading The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs? or is it another book I am not aware of?

Yup, though it's called Dinosaurs: A Field Guide over here (assuming we don't know what a Princeton is, I guess).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 21, 2013, 08:29:56 PM
Coolios. I'll have to import that sometimes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 21, 2013, 09:21:26 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 21, 2013, 08:04:23 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 21, 2013, 07:58:55 PM
Is that what it was? I always thought it was explosion that sent it flying. We see the Trike plow through the jeep initially but never actually toss it in the air.
Wouldn't the explosion have torn it apart?

Bah! An excuse to rewatch the film though. ;)

I just re-watched the scene in question. After trashing the satellite jeep, the Trike just sort of plods off-screen, we one explosion from Dieter's perspective, then hear another from where Ajay and Roland are sitting in the tree. I don't think the Trike is the reason it goes flying because it only knocks it over then we don't see or hear it again.

Quote from: OmegaZilla on Jan 21, 2013, 08:04:23 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 21, 2013, 07:58:55 PM
"I think T.Rex was an opportunistic animal".
Interesting. I think lemons are yellow!

And oranges are...well...what came first the fruit or the colour? ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 21, 2013, 11:27:57 PM
As much I enjoy JP3 (as a bit of fun) I can't ignore stupid faults.

Why do the Raptors chase them half way around the island for two eggs? I mean all the nests were unguarded, what did they expect. Not only have InGen probably grown egg eating dinosaurs but rats probably live on the island too. Stupid. I'd preferred the Raptors to chase them just because they're evil, and wanted to play mind games with them.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jan 25, 2013, 03:34:09 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 21, 2013, 11:27:57 PM
As much I enjoy JP3 (as a bit of fun) I can't ignore stupid faults.

Why do the Raptors chase them half way around the island for two eggs? I mean all the nests were unguarded, what did they expect. Not only have InGen probably grown egg eating dinosaurs but rats probably live on the island too. Stupid. I'd preferred the Raptors to chase them just because they're evil, and wanted to play mind games with them.

Agreed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 25, 2013, 04:13:43 AM
If anyone's interested, Series II figures are popping up like crazy on eBay. I just recently bid on a complete set of the small dinosaur figures along with the base human figures. Not exactly cheap, but if you're a collector, it's worth a search.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 25, 2013, 03:27:39 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Freturntofleet.files.wordpress.com%2F2012%2F12%2Fjurassic-park-full-graphic-movie-poster-design-we-buy-your-kids-mondo.jpg&hash=25e1c4f6d6ffdfff6832ed76634da510ae135b83)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 25, 2013, 05:57:13 PM
Nice.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 25, 2013, 06:09:19 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Jan 25, 2013, 03:27:39 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Freturntofleet.files.wordpress.com%2F2012%2F12%2Fjurassic-park-full-graphic-movie-poster-design-we-buy-your-kids-mondo.jpg&hash=25e1c4f6d6ffdfff6832ed76634da510ae135b83)

Its a better TWD poster than the one we got for this season ;)

In all seriousness though, really cool.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 25, 2013, 06:40:06 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Jan 25, 2013, 03:27:39 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Freturntofleet.files.wordpress.com%2F2012%2F12%2Fjurassic-park-full-graphic-movie-poster-design-we-buy-your-kids-mondo.jpg&hash=25e1c4f6d6ffdfff6832ed76634da510ae135b83)

That is really trippy. I wonder what that would appear like if one were taking acid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jan 25, 2013, 06:53:17 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 21, 2013, 11:27:57 PM
As much I enjoy JP3 (as a bit of fun) I can't ignore stupid faults.

Why do the Raptors chase them half way around the island for two eggs? I mean all the nests were unguarded, what did they expect. Not only have InGen probably grown egg eating dinosaurs but rats probably live on the island too. Stupid. I'd preferred the Raptors to chase them just because they're evil, and wanted to play mind games with them.

Plot Twist: The Raptors ALLOWED them to take the eggs, as a reason to follow them around, play mind games, and possibly as a point of tearing the group apart at certain points in the story.



It gets really boring on that island, not much else for the raptors to do.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 25, 2013, 07:43:23 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 25, 2013, 06:09:19 PM
Its a better TWD poster than the one we got for this season ;)
Are you talking about this one?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcomicbook.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F07%2Fthe-walking-dead-season-3-comic-con-poster.jpg&hash=57c6e9e4d975ecaa2e8bd445c8bddd8e7bd9817f)

Yeah, I didn't like it either  :-\ although, my guess is that they'll use this for their Season Three Limited Edition digipak set like they did with seasons 1 and 2.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 25, 2013, 07:46:22 PM
Nah, I have no problem with that. I was talking about the main poster (http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ1DUdL4Kp-B-LoM5m2l1xxtvBPtqjq4mqS20eZts0VgDBVw1v5) that I've complained about so many times before :P

At least the JP poster features the main character walking away from the viewer in the style of the first two seasons' posters for TWD ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 25, 2013, 07:51:39 PM
I like that season 3 poster. It's different (in having Rick facing front turned to the side) but still contains the same style as the first two posters.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 25, 2013, 10:25:44 PM
Rewatched JPIII, and I've concluded that I really want Joe Johnston to return behind the camera if Spielberg won't.  He just really did a great job of capturing Spielberg's JP feel.  The camera work was great.  He understood how to treat the characters (maybe not T-Rex, but he can still redeem himself with the fourth).  Also, get Don Davis back for the score since we know JW won't return. Davis has an excellent ear for Williams' sound, and he really delivered on that JPIII score.

Just listen to this...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85EKWo8MhAc# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85EKWo8MhAc#)

JPIII did a great job in bringing us back to Isla Sorna, but to a more over grown and god foresaken island.  Time's effect was presented well in this one.  I can only imagine how the fictional island looks now in JPIV.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jan 25, 2013, 11:28:12 PM
T.Rex had BETTER get proper treatment in JPIV.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jan 26, 2013, 03:30:38 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcollider.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fjurassic-park-3d.jpg&hash=2b686c1fadf5330349ae7027d12e322adcf35e70)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ghost Rider on Jan 26, 2013, 03:34:39 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Jan 26, 2013, 03:30:38 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcollider.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fjurassic-park-3d.jpg&hash=2b686c1fadf5330349ae7027d12e322adcf35e70)

Damn that looks so good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 26, 2013, 05:47:25 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Jan 26, 2013, 03:30:38 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcollider.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fjurassic-park-3d.jpg&hash=2b686c1fadf5330349ae7027d12e322adcf35e70)

Still the benchmark in CGI - 20 years later.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Jan 26, 2013, 08:36:01 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jan 26, 2013, 05:47:25 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Jan 26, 2013, 03:30:38 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcollider.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fjurassic-park-3d.jpg&hash=2b686c1fadf5330349ae7027d12e322adcf35e70)

Still the benchmark in CGI - 20 years later.

IMO, Dinosaurs haven't looked as good since.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 26, 2013, 07:00:02 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jan 26, 2013, 05:47:25 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Jan 26, 2013, 03:30:38 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcollider.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fjurassic-park-3d.jpg&hash=2b686c1fadf5330349ae7027d12e322adcf35e70)

Still the benchmark in CGI - 20 years later.

Actually, Spielberg possessed the power of time travel and was able to bring back live dinosaurs to use for his film.   ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jan 26, 2013, 08:13:27 PM
Yeah. That whole attack at the start of the film? Wasn't scripted.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Jan 26, 2013, 08:38:00 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Jan 26, 2013, 08:13:27 PM
Yeah. That whole attack at the start of the film? Wasn't scripted.
...
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_ly4mpooev51r5414t.jpg&hash=0f2bfef4aa2ae1bec4548961e8b78423c13270da)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Le Celticant on Jan 27, 2013, 03:51:37 AM
Do you know what's the difference of CGI that were made 20 years ago and CGI being made right now?

Spoiler
None apart Render time. They just "improved the tools" to be faster but it has exactly the same features / ability. Oh maybe there's now the Gamma Correction known as Linear Workflow which is very very recent so artists don't have a pain in the ass to match the gamma. But still, nothing apart speed has changed.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jan 27, 2013, 10:31:33 PM
Should it take place now-a-days or a little after JP3?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jan 27, 2013, 10:46:52 PM
I think Now-A-Days would work fine.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 27, 2013, 11:02:53 PM
Quote from: Taxemic on Jan 26, 2013, 08:36:01 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jan 26, 2013, 05:47:25 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Jan 26, 2013, 03:30:38 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcollider.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fjurassic-park-3d.jpg&hash=2b686c1fadf5330349ae7027d12e322adcf35e70)

Still the benchmark in CGI - 20 years later.

IMO, Dinosaurs haven't looked as good since.

I agree.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 28, 2013, 03:48:53 AM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Jan 26, 2013, 08:38:00 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Jan 26, 2013, 08:13:27 PM
Yeah. That whole attack at the start of the film? Wasn't scripted.
...
http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ly4mpooev51r5414t.jpg

What does that title mean, exactly? In literal terms. Was he supposed to oversee their design? Because if that's the case, yeah, he failed miserably.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 28, 2013, 06:14:12 AM
The Dinosaurs were mostly designed by Crash McCreery with color schemes by John Rosengrant, all under direction from Stan Winston and most importantly Steven Spielberg.

I have no clue of how much influence Phil Tippett had on the designs, but he supervised their movement and animation. He was in charge of the go-motion before CGI took over.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Feral_PRED on Jan 28, 2013, 11:32:41 AM
Jurassic Park 3D Blu-Ray Coming April 23 2013!

Following a highly anticipated 1 week re-release in IMAX theaters, Jurassic Park is getting the 3D Blu-Ray treatment! Fans of the JP franchise will now get the chance to own the original on 3D Blu-Ray come April 23rd, 2013!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blogcdn.com%2Fwww.engadget.com%2Fmedia%2F2013%2F01%2Fjurassic-park-blu-ray-boxes.jpg&hash=b2703b30b0e6d7b916214f1502ac3b506c9498d3)

You can pre-order your copy early on Amazon today!

http://www.jurassicpark4-movie.com/news/529 (http://www.jurassicpark4-movie.com/news/529)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Terx2 on Jan 28, 2013, 12:29:52 PM
Quote from: Alienhunter15 on Jan 28, 2013, 11:32:41 AM
Jurassic Park 3D Blu-Ray Coming April 23 2013!

Following a highly anticipated 1 week re-release in IMAX theaters, Jurassic Park is getting the 3D Blu-Ray treatment! Fans of the JP franchise will now get the chance to own the original on 3D Blu-Ray come April 23rd, 2013!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blogcdn.com%2Fwww.engadget.com%2Fmedia%2F2013%2F01%2Fjurassic-park-blu-ray-boxes.jpg&hash=b2703b30b0e6d7b916214f1502ac3b506c9498d3)

You can pre-order your copy early on Amazon today!

http://www.jurassicpark4-movie.com/news/529 (http://www.jurassicpark4-movie.com/news/529)

What do they mean by ultraviolet?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Jan 28, 2013, 02:26:56 PM
Quote from: Terx2 on Jan 28, 2013, 12:29:52 PM
Quote from: Alienhunter15 on Jan 28, 2013, 11:32:41 AM
Jurassic Park 3D Blu-Ray Coming April 23 2013!

Following a highly anticipated 1 week re-release in IMAX theaters, Jurassic Park is getting the 3D Blu-Ray treatment! Fans of the JP franchise will now get the chance to own the original on 3D Blu-Ray come April 23rd, 2013!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blogcdn.com%2Fwww.engadget.com%2Fmedia%2F2013%2F01%2Fjurassic-park-blu-ray-boxes.jpg&hash=b2703b30b0e6d7b916214f1502ac3b506c9498d3)

You can pre-order your copy early on Amazon today!

http://www.jurassicpark4-movie.com/news/529 (http://www.jurassicpark4-movie.com/news/529)

What do they mean by ultraviolet?

It's a source of Digital Copy that streams through your iCloud. It's really stupid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 29, 2013, 03:54:49 AM
Quote from: Alienhunter15 on Jan 28, 2013, 11:32:41 AM
Jurassic Park 3D Blu-Ray Coming April 23 2013!

Following a highly anticipated 1 week re-release in IMAX theaters, Jurassic Park is getting the 3D Blu-Ray treatment! Fans of the JP franchise will now get the chance to own the original on 3D Blu-Ray come April 23rd, 2013!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blogcdn.com%2Fwww.engadget.com%2Fmedia%2F2013%2F01%2Fjurassic-park-blu-ray-boxes.jpg&hash=b2703b30b0e6d7b916214f1502ac3b506c9498d3)

You can pre-order your copy early on Amazon today!

http://www.jurassicpark4-movie.com/news/529 (http://www.jurassicpark4-movie.com/news/529)

Huh. I might actually pick this up despite already owning the trilogy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rong on Feb 05, 2013, 08:55:15 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jB3z0bz7kY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jB3z0bz7kY#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Feb 05, 2013, 11:40:48 PM
That's fantastic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 06, 2013, 05:19:20 AM
Quote from: Taxemic on Jan 26, 2013, 08:36:01 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jan 26, 2013, 05:47:25 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Jan 26, 2013, 03:30:38 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcollider.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fjurassic-park-3d.jpg&hash=2b686c1fadf5330349ae7027d12e322adcf35e70)

Still the benchmark in CGI - 20 years later.

IMO, Dinosaurs haven't looked as good since.

Oh I don't know. Walking With Dinosaurs looked pretty spiffy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Feb 06, 2013, 07:34:13 PM
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/538348_513036988741189_1757316445_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Feb 06, 2013, 09:49:56 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Feb 06, 2013, 07:34:13 PM
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/538348_513036988741189_1757316445_n.jpg)

'Come on little one, push!'

The animatronics in that scene are still incredible to this day.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Eva on Feb 06, 2013, 10:32:22 PM
Yep. :-*

The effects work in the T-Rex attack still hold up incredible well to this day, despite being made 20 years ago. It's the one film Cameron wished he'd made, although he's very happy with Spielbergs effort.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Feb 06, 2013, 10:38:52 PM
Honestly, I don't think as much of Jurassic Park's CGI holds up as much as a lot of people believe.


The exceptions being the scenes with the Rex, to me. It's scenes are just brilliant.

The scene where it hunts those Gallimimus will forever be my favorite scene in any dinosaur movie ever.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Feb 06, 2013, 10:48:33 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Feb 06, 2013, 09:49:56 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Feb 06, 2013, 07:34:13 PM
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/538348_513036988741189_1757316445_n.jpg)

'Come on little one, push!'

The animatronics in that scene are still incredible to this day.

Agreed. What gets me every time is when it's out of the egg and being held in Grant's hands. Moving head, moving mouth, moving arms, moving tail, and no obvious sign of where any animatronic control might be coming from... uncanny valley bridged with a vengeance.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Eva on Feb 06, 2013, 11:04:08 PM
It was probably a real dino. :)

The parts where the CGI isn't quite holding up, are generally in bright outdoor scenes. They hadn't quite perfected skin texture and how stark light reflects on living objects, dynamic shadows etc yet. That's probably why the T-Rex scene stands out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Feb 07, 2013, 12:01:02 AM
The only effect that looks a bit dated to me is the brachiosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 07, 2013, 06:49:44 AM
When it sneezes it's a pretty dodgy shot.

Some of the Gallimimus you can see are digital too.


It is no biggie though. Every movie with practical or digital effects has its black sheep of shots. I have yet to see one devoid of those.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Feb 08, 2013, 08:36:48 AM
http://wikitravel.org/en/Jurassic_Park (http://wikitravel.org/en/Jurassic_Park)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 08, 2013, 02:45:32 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 07, 2013, 06:49:44 AM
When it sneezes it's a pretty dodgy shot.

Some of the Gallimimus you can see are digital too.


It is no biggie though. Every movie with practical or digital effects has its black sheep of shots. I have yet to see one devoid of those.

I don't think JPark's C.G.I holds up because it looks 100% real, I think it's because the texture and movement of the animation feels natural to the eyes. They look like they're there on set even if they don't look totally real.

Does that make any sense to anyone else?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 08, 2013, 03:44:00 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Feb 08, 2013, 02:45:32 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 07, 2013, 06:49:44 AM
When it sneezes it's a pretty dodgy shot.

Some of the Gallimimus you can see are digital too.


It is no biggie though. Every movie with practical or digital effects has its black sheep of shots. I have yet to see one devoid of those.

I don't think JPark's C.G.I holds up because it looks 100% real, I think it's because the texture and movement of the animation feels natural to the eyes. They look like they're there on set even if they don't look totally real.

Does that make any sense to anyone else?

Yes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 08, 2013, 04:45:32 PM
Well, they did use what was virtually the best way to animate them. They had small scale articulated models you could move around; their movement would be transferred to the CGI model.

They had Phil Tippett on board, who already had some experience in how bipedal and quadrupedal creatures moved.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 08, 2013, 05:07:53 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 08, 2013, 04:45:32 PM
Well, they did use what was virtually the best way to animate them. They had small scale articulated models you could move around; their movement would be transferred to the CGI model.

It was a blend of C.G.I and stop motion and the results were outstanding! I wonder if any other movies used this technique?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 08, 2013, 07:38:22 PM
Starship Troopers and Species are the ones that come in mind at the moment. First one with brilliant results, second with the pure opposite -- but I think that's more to do with rendering itself.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 08, 2013, 07:47:59 PM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Feb 08, 2013, 08:36:48 AM
http://wikitravel.org/en/Jurassic_Park (http://wikitravel.org/en/Jurassic_Park)

Lol, awesome. I'd visit!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 11, 2013, 11:17:09 PM
Sup kiddies, check out the goodies that arrived today.

http://instagram.com/p/Vm7iX5lEnL/ (http://instagram.com/p/Vm7iX5lEnL/)
http://instagram.com/p/Vm69A1lEmZ/ (http://instagram.com/p/Vm69A1lEmZ/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 11, 2013, 11:30:01 PM
Sweet. I have some of that stuff, actually. Though not in the packages, and a couple of them have different paintjobs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 11, 2013, 11:39:13 PM
Any pics?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 11, 2013, 11:47:24 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 11, 2013, 11:39:13 PM
Any pics?

Nah, they're in a box in my basement at the moment. :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Feb 12, 2013, 12:44:55 AM
They need to lock on a director and start casting already if they want JP4 to be released in June next year.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 12, 2013, 03:56:33 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 11, 2013, 11:17:09 PM
Sup kiddies, check out the goodies that arrived today.

http://instagram.com/p/Vm7iX5lEnL/ (http://instagram.com/p/Vm7iX5lEnL/)
http://instagram.com/p/Vm69A1lEmZ/ (http://instagram.com/p/Vm69A1lEmZ/)

You frick.

Quote from: scarhunter92 on Feb 12, 2013, 12:44:55 AM
They need to lock on a director and start casting already if they want JP4 to be released in June next year.

Tell me about it!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 12, 2013, 04:16:38 AM
From JPtoys.com:

Quote
So the rumors are true: we are getting toys for JP:3D this year! Forum member DemonCarnotaur was able to find the first few articles as they are in the system of Toys "R" Us:

Dino battler 297221 $7.99
Dino tracker 272188 $10.99
Growler 295277 $19.99
Battle pack 295334 $29.99

So far no pictures, but the names remind us of the JP2009 toy line. Although a lot of dedicated fans were hoping for more toys, the news was also received with understandable skepticism, since the majority of the fans has a very poor opinion of the toys first released for JP3 and repainted a million times afterward. The main question now is: 'Are we getting repaints AGAIN?' Only time will tell. It's also unclear if the toys will be Toys "R" Us exclusives again. Stay tuned for more news!

I'm kinda looking forward to these, as long as yeah, they aren't lame JP 3 series repaints.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 12, 2013, 04:38:03 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 12, 2013, 04:16:38 AM
From JPtoys.com:

Quote
So the rumors are true: we are getting toys for JP:3D this year! Forum member DemonCarnotaur was able to find the first few articles as they are in the system of Toys "R" Us:

Dino battler 297221 $7.99
Dino tracker 272188 $10.99
Growler 295277 $19.99
Battle pack 295334 $29.99

So far no pictures, but the names remind us of the JP2009 toy line. Although a lot of dedicated fans were hoping for more toys, the news was also received with understandable skepticism, since the majority of the fans has a very poor opinion of the toys first released for JP3 and repainted a million times afterward. The main question now is: 'Are we getting repaints AGAIN?' Only time will tell. It's also unclear if the toys will be Toys "R" Us exclusives again. Stay tuned for more news!

I'm kinda looking forward to these, as long as yeah, they aren't lame JP 3 series repaints.

How about some vintage re-releases?  Like they did for the Millennium Falcon?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 12, 2013, 04:53:01 AM
Those would make more sense granted but I'm betting those would be released, if at all, when JP IV comes out. More marketing and hype for that one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Feb 12, 2013, 08:37:47 AM
Might not be a good idea to pay $20 for some growler, you'll probably catch something.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 12, 2013, 12:00:39 PM
With the success of my collection videos I've got several people selling me loads of JP toys for ridiculously low prices. I feel like I'm in heaven. It may call for a third video haha

They do need to start this thing if 2014 is the target date. However if they pushed it back I'm sure we can wait.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 12, 2013, 03:54:18 PM
Why are they selling you more toys?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 12, 2013, 04:51:36 PM
Some guy is clearing his house and doesn't want them anymore, another is going to college and wants a good home for his JP toys. Like Andy and I'm...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-prn1%2F538852_276160412476147_665028844_n.jpg&hash=61b62043e1577a6e6e400ddafc7e8416078c9ebd)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 12, 2013, 06:30:21 PM
Motherf**ker...
;)

Anyone sold you a Carnotaurus yet? It's the Holy Grail of Series II.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 12, 2013, 06:45:34 PM
Not yet I'm afraid but one day dude. One. Day.

Although I have got these bad boys coming my way...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.auctiva.com%2Fimgdata%2F3%2F0%2F3%2F3%2F1%2F5%2Fwebimg%2F621248338_tp.jpg&hash=b891c3162fef3c383d3f439c19aa8e1791e8adf0)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.toydreams.co.uk%2Fimages%2Fjurassicpark%2Fboxed%2Fjuniortrex.jpg&hash=3018cab862b4e56c240df48f6534c0537261c681)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm3.static.flickr.com%2F2208%2F2124959332_6976140fbe.jpg&hash=95c56287e1f292572fdfa82797b221601baac136)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm3.static.flickr.com%2F2337%2F2124988834_4c00bf1fef.jpg&hash=6540c6e9a2db35c74e970e3d15a5244abf6353b9)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm2.static.flickr.com%2F1246%2F1350617579_4cedc3feff.jpg&hash=824a40536df16edd585073c6cc2dcb078bbdee34)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Feb 12, 2013, 08:48:28 PM
Who the hell is "Turner?"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 12, 2013, 10:00:30 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Feb 12, 2013, 06:45:34 PM
Not yet I'm afraid but one day dude. One. Day.

Although I have got these bad boys coming my way...

http://img.auctiva.com/imgdata/3/0/3/3/1/5/webimg/621248338_tp.jpg

http://www.toydreams.co.uk/images/jurassicpark/boxed/juniortrex.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2208/2124959332_6976140fbe.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2337/2124988834_4c00bf1fef.jpg

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1246/1350617579_4cedc3feff.jpg

f**k me, great choice there. Are they all MIB?

Quote from: KiramidHead on Feb 12, 2013, 08:48:28 PM
Who the hell is "Turner?"

Just a made up character for the Series II toy line.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 13, 2013, 12:00:21 AM
I don't think any of them are MIB. Not too bothered as long as they're in pretty good condition.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 13, 2013, 12:04:06 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Feb 12, 2013, 06:45:34 PM
Not yet I'm afraid but one day dude. One. Day.

Although I have got these bad boys coming my way...

http://img.auctiva.com/imgdata/3/0/3/3/1/5/webimg/621248338_tp.jpg

http://www.toydreams.co.uk/images/jurassicpark/boxed/juniortrex.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2208/2124959332_6976140fbe.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2337/2124988834_4c00bf1fef.jpg

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1246/1350617579_4cedc3feff.jpg

Other than the spino, I have them all ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Feb 13, 2013, 12:06:28 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 13, 2013, 12:04:06 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Feb 12, 2013, 06:45:34 PM
Not yet I'm afraid but one day dude. One. Day.

Although I have got these bad boys coming my way...

http://img.auctiva.com/imgdata/3/0/3/3/1/5/webimg/621248338_tp.jpg

http://www.toydreams.co.uk/images/jurassicpark/boxed/juniortrex.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2208/2124959332_6976140fbe.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2337/2124988834_4c00bf1fef.jpg

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1246/1350617579_4cedc3feff.jpg
Other than the spino, I have them all ;D
I assume you spared no expense acquiring them?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 13, 2013, 12:27:07 AM
Haha :D

"We have a T-Rex."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Feb 13, 2013, 12:51:52 AM
Oh my god, I had that Spinosaur and that Stegosaur at one point.


:'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 13, 2013, 12:54:35 AM
That Spino looks so derpy. It looks more like a duck than anything else.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Feb 13, 2013, 01:05:07 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 13, 2013, 12:54:35 AM
That Spino looks so derpy. It looks more like a duck than anything else.
shaddup, i didn't care when i was 8 years old. I was just happy to have dinosaur toys.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Feb 13, 2013, 01:05:22 AM
Its ribs are exposed. Surely that's a health hazard?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Feb 13, 2013, 01:38:17 AM
Quote from: TJ Doc on Feb 13, 2013, 01:05:22 AM
Its ribs are exposed. Surely that's a health hazard?

It's a zombie Spinosaurus.

The next JP movie will cross over with the Resident Evil movies.

Raptors jumping at people from trees in slo-mo while Milla Jovovich beats a T-Rex to death with kicks n' shit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Feb 13, 2013, 01:44:14 AM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Feb 13, 2013, 01:38:17 AM
Quote from: TJ Doc on Feb 13, 2013, 01:05:22 AM
Its ribs are exposed. Surely that's a health hazard?

It's a zombie Spinosaurus.

The next JP movie will cross over with the Resident Evil movies.

Raptors jumping at people from trees in slo-mo while Milla Jovovich beats a T-Rex to death with kicks n' shit.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc03.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2Ff%2F2013%2F007%2F7%2Fa%2Fjp_triceratops_with_t_virus_by_hellraptor-d338ikd.jpg&hash=b97c11ee3b7529f071c4fed244e3ecacecceded7)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc07.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2Fi%2F2013%2F007%2Fb%2F6%2Fjp_omegaraptor_t_virus_breed_by_hellraptor-d397k1l.jpg&hash=99ff2062e31c0c7b909bca2e5841e6933f3b4253)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 13, 2013, 01:53:05 AM
Chaos Effect Series II :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Feb 13, 2013, 12:31:49 PM
That's artwork from DA. There's a lot more of it. The artist combined Resi with JP if that wasn't obvious enough.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Feb 13, 2013, 08:59:42 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.comicbookmovie.com%2Fimages%2Fuploads%2Fjurrasic3d.jpg&hash=81ca6a8f02d265c24be98f57b4a7212266de8171)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Feb 13, 2013, 09:01:47 PM
'off the stick! Bloody move!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Feb 13, 2013, 09:05:53 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Feb 13, 2013, 08:59:42 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.comicbookmovie.com%2Fimages%2Fuploads%2Fjurrasic3d.jpg&hash=81ca6a8f02d265c24be98f57b4a7212266de8171)
If it weren't for the water-mark, I would love this even more.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 13, 2013, 09:11:39 PM
I'd preferred something along the lines of this...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_m9p9jz4gKp1qagdgmo1_500.gif&hash=4516ffa2a6afe09aa36bc557fd80421860da9907)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Feb 13, 2013, 09:20:04 PM
I seriously hope we get specialized 3D glasses that look like this.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Foriginaldave77.files.wordpress.com%2F2012%2F09%2Fjurassic-park-3d-glasses-2012-2013-dave-delisle-davesgeekyideas.jpg%3Fw%3D914&hash=2d3c71920ea58531c138a6682e99b7b613f7f2b4)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 13, 2013, 09:23:48 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Feb 13, 2013, 09:20:04 PM
I seriously hope we get specialized 3D glasses that look like this.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Foriginaldave77.files.wordpress.com%2F2012%2F09%2Fjurassic-park-3d-glasses-2012-2013-dave-delisle-davesgeekyideas.jpg%3Fw%3D914&hash=2d3c71920ea58531c138a6682e99b7b613f7f2b4)

That'd be incredible!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Feb 13, 2013, 09:47:35 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Feb 13, 2013, 09:11:39 PM
I'd preferred something along the lines of this...

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m9p9jz4gKp1qagdgmo1_500.gif
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Feb 13, 2013, 09:20:04 PM
I seriously hope we get specialized 3D glasses that look like this.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Foriginaldave77.files.wordpress.com%2F2012%2F09%2Fjurassic-park-3d-glasses-2012-2013-dave-delisle-davesgeekyideas.jpg%3Fw%3D914&hash=2d3c71920ea58531c138a6682e99b7b613f7f2b4)

God, either one of those things would make my year...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DJ Pu$$yface on Feb 13, 2013, 09:52:55 PM
oh god
right in the wallet
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 13, 2013, 10:31:35 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Feb 13, 2013, 08:59:42 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.comicbookmovie.com%2Fimages%2Fuploads%2Fjurrasic3d.jpg&hash=81ca6a8f02d265c24be98f57b4a7212266de8171)

I saw a trailer for it attached to Identify Thief this past weekend. I gotta say. I cried a little.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 13, 2013, 11:23:55 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Feb 13, 2013, 09:20:04 PM
I seriously hope we get specialized 3D glasses that look like this.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Foriginaldave77.files.wordpress.com%2F2012%2F09%2Fjurassic-park-3d-glasses-2012-2013-dave-delisle-davesgeekyideas.jpg%3Fw%3D914&hash=2d3c71920ea58531c138a6682e99b7b613f7f2b4)

DO WANT :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 14, 2013, 12:12:08 AM
Quote from: Shasvre on Feb 13, 2013, 08:59:42 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.comicbookmovie.com%2Fimages%2Fuploads%2Fjurrasic3d.jpg&hash=81ca6a8f02d265c24be98f57b4a7212266de8171)

Awesome poster, but they couldn't get the T-Rex looking anymore wrong.

Quote from: King Rathalos on Feb 13, 2013, 09:47:35 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Feb 13, 2013, 09:11:39 PM
I'd preferred something along the lines of this...

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m9p9jz4gKp1qagdgmo1_500.gif
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Feb 13, 2013, 09:20:04 PM
I seriously hope we get specialized 3D glasses that look like this.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Foriginaldave77.files.wordpress.com%2F2012%2F09%2Fjurassic-park-3d-glasses-2012-2013-dave-delisle-davesgeekyideas.jpg%3Fw%3D914&hash=2d3c71920ea58531c138a6682e99b7b613f7f2b4)

God, either one of those things would make my year...

INDEED!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Feb 14, 2013, 04:46:44 PM
Why's the rex so fugly on the poster?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Feb 14, 2013, 05:32:29 PM
Quote from: Gilfryd on Feb 14, 2013, 04:46:44 PM
Why's the rex so fugly on the poster?

Looks like a weird angle to me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Feb 14, 2013, 05:43:46 PM
The model just looks poorly textured and rendered. Not sure why they had to choose that instead of editing a still from the movie, which would have worked just fine for a small promo like that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 15, 2013, 04:10:31 AM
I have a feeling that poster is fan made considering how lousy that Rex looks.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The One and Only on Feb 15, 2013, 05:43:02 AM
Hasbro will be once again handling the toyline for the franchise.
http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118066172/ (http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118066172/)
Also some may think that with the next JP flick rolling out next year, that maybe Hasbro will dust off the shut down G.I. JOE/JURASSIC PARK line of figures.
http://www.joedeclassified.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=602 (http://www.joedeclassified.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=602)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jptoys.com%2Ftoy-database%2Fjurassic-park-2011%2Fimg%2Fjp2011artwork.jpg&hash=6b8f236d95564c7d53c4f2d2f15faca360462e0d)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 15, 2013, 06:10:16 AM
Heard about that. I have a feeling they'll be JP 2009 repaints, the ones being released this year based on their names.

Hopefully with the release of JP IV we'll get new, fresh toys.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: cloverfan98 on Feb 17, 2013, 06:37:24 AM
In adition to the JPIV toys there is a thread on JP Legacy where some one has learned that there will be Toys R Us exclusive Hasbro JP3D toys starting in March 1st or 10th!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 17, 2013, 11:19:13 PM
Any details, such as design and such? JPtoys.net has nothing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 18, 2013, 12:27:28 AM
Once again, hopefully a homage to Kenner!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 18, 2013, 12:30:40 AM
I'm crossing my fingers for a vintage, limited re-release of the Series 1 toys. That was the line everyone remembers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 18, 2013, 07:06:08 AM
Btw, just to let everyone know *gulps*....

I'm............auctioning off my JP collection as well as other organized lots (my Hulks, Godzillas, King Kongs, Batman, etc) on ebay.  If any of you are interested, I may have it up by tomorrow, but I'll be damned if I don't charge a shiny penny for 'em.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 18, 2013, 08:44:41 AM
Link me, I'd be interested for sure.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 18, 2013, 02:21:53 PM
Alright.  I'll warn you though.  They're not in.....the best condition.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 18, 2013, 02:25:06 PM
Kathleen Kennedy No Longer Producing JURASSIC PARK IV

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=74427 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=74427)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 18, 2013, 02:29:22 PM
Yeah.  I read about that from my friend who recieved that info, first hand, from Frank Marshall himself on Twitter.  He runs JurassicParkIV.org.

Really sucks though.  She was with the project for so long - then steps down for Star Wars just as the movie is finally green lit?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 18, 2013, 02:33:07 PM
Well, she is pretty much running Lucasfilm at this point.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Feb 18, 2013, 03:41:41 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 18, 2013, 02:25:06 PM
Kathleen Kennedy No Longer Producing JURASSIC PARK IV

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=74427 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=74427)

Not sure how to take this. Sounds like bad news to me  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 18, 2013, 04:48:02 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 18, 2013, 02:29:22 PM
Yeah.  I read about that from my friend who recieved that info, first hand, from Frank Marshall himself on Twitter.  He runs JurassicParkIV.org.

Really sucks though.  She was with the project for so long - then steps down for Star Wars just as the movie is finally green lit?

There must be more going on than we're aware of. I replied to Marshall's tweet. I'll let you guys know if I receive a response.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Feb 18, 2013, 04:53:08 PM
Bad news for the movie. But it's good for Star Wars.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Feb 18, 2013, 05:20:55 PM
She has a hard job over at Lucasfilm. Understandable stuff.

But at least she got talented people to write the new script before she left.. it's not as if she just left the project in bad waters...

the new producers better know what they are doing :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 18, 2013, 06:15:51 PM
Well, here's what's left of my JP collection up for auction on ebay....

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=121068861681 (http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=121068861681)

*Slams door behind and runs down hall crying*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 18, 2013, 10:34:42 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 18, 2013, 02:25:06 PM
Kathleen Kennedy No Longer Producing JURASSIC PARK IV

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=74427 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=74427)

Hmmm...  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Feb 19, 2013, 12:01:40 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Feb 18, 2013, 03:41:41 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 18, 2013, 02:25:06 PM
Kathleen Kennedy No Longer Producing JURASSIC PARK IV

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=74427 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=74427)

Not sure how to take this. Sounds like bad news to me  :-\

Sounds like fine news to me. No way was she going to juggle Star Wars and Jurassic park, and it's not like Steven Spielberg or Frank Marshall are going to drop out just because KK left.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 19, 2013, 03:46:32 AM
So it seems Hasbro cares after all. From JPtoys.com:

QuoteThank God, our prayers were answered. We do get (some) new sculpts for the first time in many years. So far it seems that the unreleased JP2011 Allosaurus and JP2011 Pachyrhinosaurus will actually be released! The rest of the line will likely contain of repaints, although there is a rumor it would also include the unreleased JP2011 A.W.E. Strikers.

Unfortunately, not all the news was good. The line seems to be Toys "R" Us only, as well as USA and Canada only. Good news for all the fans living there, bad news for the fans living abroad. Stay tuned for more news!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Feb 19, 2013, 03:50:11 AM
They talking about this?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jptoys.com%2Ftoy-database%2Fjurassic-park-2011%2Fallosaurus%2Fimg%2Fallosaurus.jpg&hash=9568ff1914a404f08b6550b6d2f07befa2079c79)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 19, 2013, 03:52:49 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Feb 19, 2013, 03:50:11 AM
They talking about this?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jptoys.com%2Ftoy-database%2Fjurassic-park-2011%2Fallosaurus%2Fimg%2Fallosaurus.jpg&hash=9568ff1914a404f08b6550b6d2f07befa2079c79)

Well, lick my balls....
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 19, 2013, 04:54:23 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Feb 19, 2013, 03:50:11 AM
They talking about this?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jptoys.com%2Ftoy-database%2Fjurassic-park-2011%2Fallosaurus%2Fimg%2Fallosaurus.jpg&hash=9568ff1914a404f08b6550b6d2f07befa2079c79)

Looks like it. I'm sure the finished toy would look much better.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Feb 19, 2013, 05:48:02 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Feb 19, 2013, 03:50:11 AM
They talking about this?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jptoys.com%2Ftoy-database%2Fjurassic-park-2011%2Fallosaurus%2Fimg%2Fallosaurus.jpg&hash=9568ff1914a404f08b6550b6d2f07befa2079c79)

Oh My God Want.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Feb 19, 2013, 09:24:41 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-snc7%2F402941_518941931484028_1930066443_n.jpg&hash=28bb49d3006ade3d93f0cdce7db6bb8b9bd7735c)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 19, 2013, 09:29:49 PM
Iiii can't get over the fact it's two animatronic shots vs a cgi shot. Aaaahbabbl.

I love love love them all but Rex is my favourite.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Feb 19, 2013, 09:38:06 PM
It's a tie between the T-Rex and the Raptors for me. But the Dilophosaurus was definitely the one that scared me the most as a kid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 19, 2013, 11:44:05 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Feb 19, 2013, 09:24:41 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-snc7%2F402941_518941931484028_1930066443_n.jpg&hash=28bb49d3006ade3d93f0cdce7db6bb8b9bd7735c)

Doyouthinkhesawrus. Y'all ain't shit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 20, 2013, 03:53:45 AM
T

R

E

X
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 20, 2013, 08:47:07 AM
I'm so happy my favourite film is coming back (again in 2 years) to the BIG screen.

My vote is the T-Rex. The Tyrannosaur breaking out of its paddock is still one of the greatest scenes of all time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Feb 20, 2013, 06:16:19 PM
Mondo Poster:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcollider.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FMark-Englert-Its-A-Dinosaur.jpg&hash=27a624a680294285afedb6d5ef7d8a15fd513a9e)

http://collider.com/mark-englert-its-a-dinosaur-poster/ (http://collider.com/mark-englert-its-a-dinosaur-poster/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 21, 2013, 02:14:10 AM
I'd label it perfect if Hammond's silhouette didn't look so damn forced in.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 21, 2013, 06:34:44 AM
I feel the same way. It is a nice concept but the way it is drawn it would be better without the silhouette.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Feb 22, 2013, 05:36:42 PM
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/563140_520393054672249_190382818_n.png)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 22, 2013, 05:50:50 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Feb 22, 2013, 05:36:42 PM
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/563140_520393054672249_190382818_n.png)

Hell yeah, BOII!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Feb 22, 2013, 05:53:21 PM
Now I know why they brushed its teeth in the book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 22, 2013, 06:59:55 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Feb 22, 2013, 05:36:42 PM
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/563140_520393054672249_190382818_n.png)

T.Rex could not run up to 25 MPH, that's absurd. KPH yes, definitely not MPH.
http://io9.com/5853758/could-you-outrun-a-tyrannosaurus-rex (http://io9.com/5853758/could-you-outrun-a-tyrannosaurus-rex)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Feb 22, 2013, 07:07:39 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 22, 2013, 06:59:55 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Feb 22, 2013, 05:36:42 PM
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/563140_520393054672249_190382818_n.png)

T.Rex could not run up to 25 MPH, that's absurd. KPH yes, definitely not MPH.
http://io9.com/5853758/could-you-outrun-a-tyrannosaurus-rex (http://io9.com/5853758/could-you-outrun-a-tyrannosaurus-rex)

It says an "estimated" speed of. Many studies have shown they can reach 10 to 18 MPH, sometimes they can run at 25MPH but not all can go that fast.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 22, 2013, 09:30:23 PM
I've never heard of a study that showed T.Rex could reach 25 MPH. If anything, they've dis-proven that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Feb 22, 2013, 09:35:12 PM
I'm pretty sure they don't go that fast.

Skeletons don't tend to do much running.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 22, 2013, 09:45:04 PM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Feb 22, 2013, 09:35:12 PM
Skeletons don't tend to do much running.

You sure? Because I can't name a single animal without a skeleton that can run :-\

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.epicgifs.net%2Fimages%2Fshow%2FEKRIFMQ6&hash=3c20885b62bc9183b1787e96128ef0263dd7ae99)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Feb 22, 2013, 11:00:23 PM
I've seen estimates for Tyrannosaurus speed going all the way up to 40mph. As far as I know, there isn't even a computer model which can accurately calculate speeds for a wide variety of living species, so in the absence of a great set of trackways (though even these can be controversial), it's an extremely murky subject. For what it's worth, an elephant can lope up to 24mph (16mph sustained), and that's keeping three feet on the ground so technically it isn't even running.

That low estimate - 10mph - is under the assumption that Tyrannosaurus couldn't run. Jack Horner and chums have posited that the risk of falling over would have been too high, as this would likely be fatal for the animal, so it would have approached prey at a brisk walk (~8 to 12mph). I believe that's currently a minority view; rexy had gargantuan leg muscles hooking back to its tail which would have given it a powerful gait.


:edit: I'm also not sure about the evidence for tyrannosaurs killing then eating each other. Lions kill each other occasionally (despite being highly social) but rarely eat slain rivals; curiously that's more of a ritual reserved for dead family members.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 23, 2013, 07:17:35 AM
Tyrannosaurus could run, that much is obvious. But scientists know it couldn't run fast and for very long distances because its tibia and femus were the same length, like a humans. If you look at an ostrich, it's tibia is longer than its femur which gives it the leverage to run which is why it's faster than a human even though we aren't much smaller physically. Where did you see that it could run up to 40 MPH?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Feb 23, 2013, 09:32:30 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 23, 2013, 07:17:35 AM
Tyrannosaurus could run, that much is obvious. But scientists know it couldn't run fast and for very long distances because its tibia and femus were the same length, like a humans. If you look at an ostrich, it's tibia is longer than its femur which gives it the leverage to run which is why it's faster than a human even though we aren't much smaller physically. Where did you see that it could run up to 40 MPH?

An elephant's femur and tibia are roughly equal size too, but as previously mentioned, it can move fairly quickly. Adult rexes obviously weren't sprinters, because as you say they have the wrong configuration, but musculature and the finer points of locomotion can count for a lot. Personally, I think that like a crocodile (which has a similar configuration in which muscles leading back to the tail help power its movement) it would have been capable of massive acceleration, with a fairly low top speed and minimal stamina.

I can't remember specifically where I've heard 40mph, the point is that there's a ridiculous range of estimates out there, because there is no such thing as a good model for estimating animal speed. The more the model takes musculature into account, the higher the estimate tends to be - and Tyrannosaurus looks to be more muscular relative to dimensions than any other theropod, giving it a particularly broad range of guesses. One more point is that the majority of models underestimate by a significant amount; nature tends to be capable of more than we expect it to.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 23, 2013, 01:53:02 PM
Exactly.

And that image isn't exactly the best scientific source. We do know they got into fights (teeth have left traces in bones) but I have no idea who ever said that they ate the killed rival. Kinda sensationalist.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Feb 23, 2013, 03:29:08 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 23, 2013, 01:53:02 PM
Exactly.

And that image isn't exactly the best scientific source. We do know they got into fights (teeth have left traces in bones) but I have no idea who ever said that they ate the killed rival. Kinda sensationalist.

It's gotta eat somehow. I'm sure all dino's that fought and killed the opposing dino ate it. Isn't that what Spino did when he killed the T-Rex?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 23, 2013, 05:24:25 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Feb 23, 2013, 09:32:30 AM
An elephant's femur and tibia are roughly equal size too, but as previously mentioned, it can move fairly quickly. Adult rexes obviously weren't sprinters, because as you say they have the wrong configuration, but musculature and the finer points of locomotion can count for a lot. Personally, I think that like a crocodile (which has a similar configuration in which muscles leading back to the tail help power its movement) it would have been capable of massive acceleration, with a fairly low top speed and minimal stamina.

Yes, and like an elephant, a Rex could run like I said. I also said that it couldn't maintain that speed over long distances or go much faster than tops, 25 KPH. But at the end of the day, that's still pretty flippin' quick for an animal that could weigh up to nine tons.

Quote from: Vertigo on Feb 23, 2013, 09:32:30 AM
I can't remember specifically where I've heard 40mph, the point is that there's a ridiculous range of estimates out there, because there is no such thing as a good model for estimating animal speed. The more the model takes musculature into account, the higher the estimate tends to be - and Tyrannosaurus looks to be more muscular relative to dimensions than any other theropod, giving it a particularly broad range of guesses. One more point is that the majority of models underestimate by a significant amount; nature tends to be capable of more than we expect it to.

Most of the musculature in T.Rex was designed to keep the big guy standing on his own two feet given how heavily built he was. If T.Rex could reach 40 MPH, it's been said that 90% of its muscle power would have been concentrated in its legs which wouldn't leave much room for anything else.

Quote from: Rick Grimes on Feb 23, 2013, 03:29:08 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 23, 2013, 01:53:02 PM
Exactly.

And that image isn't exactly the best scientific source. We do know they got into fights (teeth have left traces in bones) but I have no idea who ever said that they ate the killed rival. Kinda sensationalist.

It's gotta eat somehow. I'm sure all dino's that fought and killed the opposing dino ate it. Isn't that what Spino did when he killed the T-Rex?

We don't see the Spino eat the Rex. As for eating rivals, no evidence of that exists in the fossil record. The only dinosaur we know for sure ate its rivals was Majungasaurus of Late Cretaceous Madagascar. Some bones have been recovered which show evidence of having been eaten.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Feb 23, 2013, 05:28:22 PM
So I take it we can ignore the facts for they are not "factually accurate?"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 23, 2013, 06:31:41 PM
I'm not saying its impossible. In fact, it's very likely given the rough nature of being a predatory dinosaur (see: Big Al documentary). But me personally, I haven't read any studies proving it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 24, 2013, 12:49:23 AM
****A LOT OF GREAT NEWS/ RUMORS FOR JPIV SET LOCATIONS AND FILMING SCHEDULES/MASSIVE PROPOSED BUDGET! ALL PLAUSIBLE!!****


Read the rumor and speculation articles Jack posted on the this page!

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/ (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Feb 24, 2013, 02:01:53 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 24, 2013, 12:49:23 AM
****A LOT OF GREAT NEWS/ RUMORS FOR JPIV SET LOCATIONS AND FILMING SCHEDULES/MASSIVE PROPOSED BUDGET! ALL PLAUSIBLE!!****


Read the rumor and speculation articles Jack posted on the this page!

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/ (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/)

Niiice!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Feb 24, 2013, 02:08:00 AM
there better be animatronic dinosaurs in this movie!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DontRelaxJustYetMarines on Feb 24, 2013, 03:22:03 AM
Jurassic Park - awesome, best use of cgi ever.
Jurassic Park II:  The Lost World - shit.
Jurassic Park III:  a guilty pleasure.  I can watch it but it is pretty lame and forgettable.
Jurassic Park IV:  I don't give a shit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Feb 24, 2013, 03:31:37 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Feb 24, 2013, 02:08:00 AM
there better be animatronic dinosaurs in this movie!

Damn straight. If they don't use Legacy effects it'll be a shame.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 24, 2013, 04:13:52 AM
Quote from: DontRelaxJustYetMarines on Feb 24, 2013, 03:22:03 AM
Jurassic Park - awesome, best use of cgi ever.
Jurassic Park II:  The Lost World - shit.
Jurassic Park III:  a guilty pleasure.  I can watch it but it is pretty lame and forgettable.
Jurassic Park IV:  I don't give a shit.

You need to go to the hospital.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DontRelaxJustYetMarines on Feb 24, 2013, 04:40:20 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 24, 2013, 04:13:52 AM
Quote from: DontRelaxJustYetMarines on Feb 24, 2013, 03:22:03 AM
Jurassic Park - awesome, best use of cgi ever.
Jurassic Park II:  The Lost World - shit.
Jurassic Park III:  a guilty pleasure.  I can watch it but it is pretty lame and forgettable.
Jurassic Park IV:  I don't give a shit.

You need to go to the hospital.

You need to live a happy life.  Be happy!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Feb 24, 2013, 04:58:30 AM
Quote from: DontRelaxJustYetMarines on Feb 24, 2013, 03:22:03 AM
Jurassic Park - awesome, best use of cgi ever.
Jurassic Park II:  The Lost World - shit.
Jurassic Park III:  a guilty pleasure.  I can watch it but it is pretty lame and forgettable.
Jurassic Park IV:  I don't give a shit.

Don't judge a movie that isn't out yet  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DontRelaxJustYetMarines on Feb 24, 2013, 05:03:49 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Feb 24, 2013, 04:58:30 AM
Quote from: DontRelaxJustYetMarines on Feb 24, 2013, 03:22:03 AM
Jurassic Park - awesome, best use of cgi ever.
Jurassic Park II:  The Lost World - shit.
Jurassic Park III:  a guilty pleasure.  I can watch it but it is pretty lame and forgettable.
Jurassic Park IV:  I don't give a shit.

Don't judge a movie that isn't out yet  ;)

So I have to spend money to watch the turd?  Yes, the fourth movie in a series is always a masterpiece.  Just watch any fourth movie in a series and this will confirm it.  You sir, are a genius.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Feb 24, 2013, 05:17:48 AM
Quote from: DontRelaxJustYetMarines on Feb 24, 2013, 05:03:49 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Feb 24, 2013, 04:58:30 AM
Quote from: DontRelaxJustYetMarines on Feb 24, 2013, 03:22:03 AM
Jurassic Park - awesome, best use of cgi ever.
Jurassic Park II:  The Lost World - shit.
Jurassic Park III:  a guilty pleasure.  I can watch it but it is pretty lame and forgettable.
Jurassic Park IV:  I don't give a shit.

Don't judge a movie that isn't out yet  ;)

So I have to spend money to watch the turd?  Yes, the fourth movie in a series is always a masterpiece.  Just watch any fourth movie in a series and this will confirm it.  You sir, are a genius.

Clearly, someone doesn't have an optimistic look in things.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PVTDukeMorrison on Feb 24, 2013, 05:20:56 AM
I liked the lost world,  apart from the backflipraptorkick, but I still liked it...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 24, 2013, 08:39:03 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 24, 2013, 12:49:23 AM
****A LOT OF GREAT NEWS/ RUMORS FOR JPIV SET LOCATIONS AND FILMING SCHEDULES/MASSIVE PROPOSED BUDGET! ALL PLAUSIBLE!!****


Read the rumor and speculation articles Jack posted on the this page!

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/ (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/)

All I see on the page are warning lines and broken links.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 24, 2013, 10:25:14 AM
I've been following the project for so f**kING long I don't want any more rumors. Shit's been up since 2001. I want concrete, official news. If the film is getting made, we will eventually have those. Like the release date some time ago.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Feb 24, 2013, 12:52:23 PM
Quote from: DontRelaxJustYetMarines on Feb 24, 2013, 05:03:49 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Feb 24, 2013, 04:58:30 AM
Quote from: DontRelaxJustYetMarines on Feb 24, 2013, 03:22:03 AM
Jurassic Park - awesome, best use of cgi ever.
Jurassic Park II:  The Lost World - shit.
Jurassic Park III:  a guilty pleasure.  I can watch it but it is pretty lame and forgettable.
Jurassic Park IV:  I don't give a shit.

Don't judge a movie that isn't out yet  ;)

So I have to spend money to watch the turd?  Yes, the fourth movie in a series is always a masterpiece.  Just watch any fourth movie in a series and this will confirm it.  You sir, are a genius.

MI4 is regarded by most people as the best in the series, if not the second best.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Feb 24, 2013, 03:41:02 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Feb 24, 2013, 12:52:23 PM
Quote from: DontRelaxJustYetMarines on Feb 24, 2013, 05:03:49 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Feb 24, 2013, 04:58:30 AM
Quote from: DontRelaxJustYetMarines on Feb 24, 2013, 03:22:03 AM
Jurassic Park - awesome, best use of cgi ever.
Jurassic Park II:  The Lost World - shit.
Jurassic Park III:  a guilty pleasure.  I can watch it but it is pretty lame and forgettable.
Jurassic Park IV:  I don't give a shit.

Don't judge a movie that isn't out yet  ;)

So I have to spend money to watch the turd?  Yes, the fourth movie in a series is always a masterpiece.  Just watch any fourth movie in a series and this will confirm it.  You sir, are a genius.

MI4 is regarded by most people as the best in the series, if not the second best.

This.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 25, 2013, 08:54:05 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 24, 2013, 10:25:14 AM
I've been following the project for so f**kING long I don't want any more rumors. Shit's been up since 2001. I want concrete, official news. If the film is getting made, we will eventually have those. Like the release date some time ago.

Rumours will persist until we get a story. For the time being, I'm still worried about human/dino hybrids.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The One and Only on Feb 25, 2013, 05:30:03 PM
^Which still sounds more fun than finding another excuse to go to the island again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 25, 2013, 05:31:45 PM
Stan Winston School talks about working on JPIV, "Can't reveal anything"

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=17 (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=17)

Make sure to check out the video link.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 25, 2013, 05:52:17 PM
Quote from: The One and Only on Feb 25, 2013, 05:30:03 PM
^Which still sounds more fun than finding another excuse to go to the island again.

Except it's supremely stupid and would utterly destroy the series.

Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 25, 2013, 05:31:45 PM
Stan Winston School talks about working on JPIV, "Can't reveal anything"

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=17 (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=17)

Make sure to check out the video link.

I hope so! I'd rather not see ADI involved, given how lame their work on the AvP movies was.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 25, 2013, 06:45:21 PM
It depends on who is at helm creatively. ADI did what they were asked.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ShadowPred on Feb 25, 2013, 06:51:49 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 25, 2013, 05:52:17 PM
I hope so! I'd rather not see ADI involved, given how lame their work on the AvP movies was.


Hilarious...


Let's all forget their work on films such as:

WOLF

Mortal Kombat

Jumanji

Starship Troopers

The X-Files

Cast Away

Spider-Man

Alpha Dog

The Incredible Hulk

Cirque Du Freak

etc.

But let's just ignore all previous work and just focus how they "f**ked up" on the AvP movies.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 25, 2013, 06:52:55 PM
When listing ADI's remarkable work, you have to mention Tremors...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ShadowPred on Feb 25, 2013, 06:57:12 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Feb 25, 2013, 06:52:55 PM
When listing ADI's remarkable work, you have to mention Tremors...


Omg, I thought I did list it. f**k, must have slipped my keyboard tapping when I was thinking of what films I knew for sure they did work on.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Feb 25, 2013, 06:57:41 PM
^ That. They do what they can with the budget. If the directors are crap then their hard work aint gonna show well on the screen. 

The only stated reason they didnt work on Prometheus was because Ridley was going to shoot in the UK. according to their youtube page at least.

And at a certain point in human history we need to see this in film:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.followingthenerd.com%2Fsite%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F64877-e1349975430363.jpg&hash=9f6483ba7183c6f550e76c056b41a296fff607aa)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgeektyrant.com%2Fstorage%2F0999-post-images%2Fjurassicpar410920129.png%3F__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION%3D1349884311165&hash=9bb051ee5825de4ec14c88697d4a6e4b76b8f776)

Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 25, 2013, 05:52:17 PM
Except it's supremely stupid and would utterly destroy the series.

The series already had a Spinosaurus crap out a cellphone in the 3rd flick.. and gymnastics were used to kill a velociraptor in the 2nd... i think we'll do fine with human-dino-dog-hybrids.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 25, 2013, 07:02:08 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inewyork.it%2Fwordpress%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F03%2Ftremors.jpg&hash=6212fd8ef1664ff1ded4772c555b44f33b93c049)

YEAHHH
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 25, 2013, 07:13:23 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Feb 25, 2013, 06:57:41 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 25, 2013, 05:52:17 PM
Except it's supremely stupid and would utterly destroy the series.

The series already had a Spinosaurus crap out a cellphone in the 3rd flick.. and gymnastics were used to kill a velociraptor in the 2nd... i think we'll do fine with human-dino-dog-hybrids.  :laugh:

Are you seriously comparing those two to freaking dino/human hybrids? Those ideas were cheesy. The hybrids are just stupid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Feb 25, 2013, 08:19:22 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 25, 2013, 07:13:23 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Feb 25, 2013, 06:57:41 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 25, 2013, 05:52:17 PM
Except it's supremely stupid and would utterly destroy the series.

The series already had a Spinosaurus crap out a cellphone in the 3rd flick.. and gymnastics were used to kill a velociraptor in the 2nd... i think we'll do fine with human-dino-dog-hybrids.  :laugh:

Are you seriously comparing those two to freaking dino/human hybrids? Those ideas were cheesy. The hybrids are just stupid.

Hear freaking hear. People watch Jurassic Park for dinosaurs and Jeff Goldblum. If you want hybrids you can stick Alien Resurrection into whatever set-top box is compatible with disc-shaped wafers of shit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 25, 2013, 09:37:33 PM
Welp.  I sold my JP collection on ebay for a total of $235  :)

Spoiler
:'( :'( :'(
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 25, 2013, 09:55:20 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Feb 25, 2013, 08:19:22 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 25, 2013, 07:13:23 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Feb 25, 2013, 06:57:41 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 25, 2013, 05:52:17 PM
Except it's supremely stupid and would utterly destroy the series.

The series already had a Spinosaurus crap out a cellphone in the 3rd flick.. and gymnastics were used to kill a velociraptor in the 2nd... i think we'll do fine with human-dino-dog-hybrids.  :laugh:

Are you seriously comparing those two to freaking dino/human hybrids? Those ideas were cheesy. The hybrids are just stupid.

Hear freaking hear. People watch Jurassic Park for dinosaurs and Jeff Goldblum. If you want hybrids you can stick Alien Resurrection into whatever set-top box is compatible with disc-shaped wafers of shit.

And Sam Neill ;D

Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 25, 2013, 09:37:33 PM
Welp.  I sold my JP collection on ebay for a total of $235  :)

Spoiler
:'( :'( :'(
[close]


*in Reverend Lovejoy voice*
There there. There there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 25, 2013, 09:56:27 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 25, 2013, 09:37:33 PM
Welp.  I sold my JP collection on ebay for a total of $235  :)

Spoiler
:'( :'( :'(
[close]
:-[
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Feb 26, 2013, 12:20:41 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 25, 2013, 09:37:33 PM
Welp.  I sold my JP collection on ebay for a total of $235  :)

Spoiler
:'( :'( :'(
[close]


Not worth it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomorphine on Feb 26, 2013, 11:19:20 AM
If you want to see what ADI is truly capable of, go to You Tube and search for the screen test of their version of the Green Goblin and the footage of their physical effects for the recent 'The Thing' prequel.

You'll do a complete 180 on your opinion of them.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Feb 26, 2013, 02:58:36 PM
I believe they are technically a very capable talent group.

I just think that their aesthetic work leaves something to be desired.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Feb 26, 2013, 03:02:56 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Feb 26, 2013, 12:20:41 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 25, 2013, 09:37:33 PM
Welp.  I sold my JP collection on ebay for a total of $235  :)

Spoiler
:'( :'( :'(
[close]


Not worth it.
I'd say it is. For something of that quantity and the size it takes up, if it's not being used as something to display, it becomes baggage. There's lots of memories and sentimentality that goes along with them, but ultimately, it's not meant to be held onto.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Feb 26, 2013, 03:07:46 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Feb 26, 2013, 03:02:56 PM
There's lots of memories and sentimentality that goes along with them, but ultimately, it's not meant to be held onto.

Use that logic for your testies (and lack of) too?


Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fx1f.xanga.com%2Fa39e003216432282709507%2Fm225379094.jpg&hash=d056e43131c3ebe2a8ab8c73a0385cf30e0bce04)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Feb 26, 2013, 03:09:10 PM
If they can go for a high price...

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F29.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_lltzgnHi5F1qzib3wo1_400.jpg&hash=1c82cca7196b7ab4a45b60bffe2a5f647d6221ce)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ScardyFox on Feb 26, 2013, 03:13:06 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Feb 26, 2013, 03:09:10 PM
If they can go for a high price...

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F29.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_lltzgnHi5F1qzib3wo1_400.jpg&hash=1c82cca7196b7ab4a45b60bffe2a5f647d6221ce)
[close]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-q29hbEP04#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-q29hbEP04#ws)


and I'm OUT!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Feb 26, 2013, 03:14:21 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Feb 26, 2013, 03:09:10 PM
If they can go for a high price...

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F29.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_lltzgnHi5F1qzib3wo1_400.jpg&hash=1c82cca7196b7ab4a45b60bffe2a5f647d6221ce)
[close]

You'd be willing to part with your quad?

f**k, man. Just... f**k.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 26, 2013, 07:10:11 PM
Speaking of collections, I have to admit that for me, the hardest part about building a JP collection is picking which toys I want. Every so often on eBay, someone will post a rare one for a killer price but that's one amongst several, you know? I actually had to make a list in order of rarest items to figure out which ones I want first so that I stop spreading myself out all over the place.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Feb 27, 2013, 07:36:44 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zG5nyDPw1yY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zG5nyDPw1yY#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 27, 2013, 07:58:03 PM
Oh, Lord...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Feb 27, 2013, 08:08:24 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Feb 27, 2013, 07:36:44 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zG5nyDPw1yY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zG5nyDPw1yY#ws)

Muldoon with the raptor. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 28, 2013, 05:46:01 PM
My Series 1 JP dinosaur set is complete!!!! This lovely addition arrived just half an hour ago.

http://instagram.com/p/WSGnyqlEtN/ (http://instagram.com/p/WSGnyqlEtN/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: coolbreeze on Feb 28, 2013, 05:50:25 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 28, 2013, 05:46:01 PM
My Series 1 JP dinosaur set is complete!!!! This lovely addition arrived just half an hour ago.

http://instagram.com/p/WSGnyqlEtN/ (http://instagram.com/p/WSGnyqlEtN/)

Nice, I have that one.  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 28, 2013, 06:04:44 PM
It was surprisingly hard to find, and at a good price. I snatched this sucker up for less than $100 grand total. Anything less than that wasn't complete and the ones that were complete sold for higher prices.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: coolbreeze on Feb 28, 2013, 06:13:10 PM
I still have a bin full of JP toys.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 28, 2013, 06:16:33 PM
Here's a pic of my complete dino set...the big ones, anyway.

http://instagram.com/p/WSL2qVFEit/ (http://instagram.com/p/WSL2qVFEit/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 28, 2013, 06:25:09 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 28, 2013, 05:46:01 PM
My Series 1 JP dinosaur set is complete!!!! This lovely addition arrived just half an hour ago.

http://instagram.com/p/WSGnyqlEtN/ (http://instagram.com/p/WSGnyqlEtN/)

Well done man!

Even I don't have that one. A close friend does and I'm super jealous of him, and now you. >:(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 28, 2013, 06:33:13 PM
Dude, hunt on eBay. They always crop up from time to time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Feb 28, 2013, 06:38:07 PM
The Steg was pretty much impossible to find at the time. I remember hunting around for it everywhere, and none of my friends had one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 28, 2013, 06:42:09 PM
At the time, you mean back in '93?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Feb 28, 2013, 10:28:23 PM
Yup, 93-95, thereabouts.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 28, 2013, 11:57:57 PM
Ah, those were the days. I still think I'll see them in some obscure corner at my local Toys R Us :')
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 01, 2013, 03:15:33 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 28, 2013, 06:16:33 PM
Here's a pic of my complete dino set...the big ones, anyway.

http://instagram.com/p/WSL2qVFEit/ (http://instagram.com/p/WSL2qVFEit/)

I'm assuming you'll never take them out of the boxes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 01, 2013, 03:53:55 AM
No. But when I received the big Rex, I did open and pull her out to see which collector's card she came with.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 01, 2013, 02:20:51 PM
Take them out! Love them, and play with them.

Hasn't Toy Story taught you anything?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 01, 2013, 05:14:38 PM
No. And when a toy costs me close to $200, the last thing I'm going to do is "love it" :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 01, 2013, 05:39:39 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 01, 2013, 05:14:38 PM
No. And when a toy costs me close to $200, the last thing I'm going to do is "love it" :P

See, to me, that makes no sense. Like buying a car and never driving it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Mar 01, 2013, 05:41:09 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 01, 2013, 05:39:39 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 01, 2013, 05:14:38 PM
No. And when a toy costs me close to $200, the last thing I'm going to do is "love it" :P

See, to me, that makes no sense. Like buying a car and never driving it.

I'm on your boat. Collectionists' mindset I guess... :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 01, 2013, 05:43:14 PM
I'd personally never spend $200 on something like that for it to jut it there in a box. If I were to buy a figure (which I very, very rarely do) that thing is getting properly displayed!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Mar 01, 2013, 05:45:16 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 01, 2013, 05:14:38 PM
No. And when a toy costs me close to $200, the last thing I'm going to do is "love it" :P
I agree with that. If it cost you that much to buy it, no way I'm taking the risk of breaking it with my rough housing  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 01, 2013, 05:46:58 PM
I tend to use my JP toys now as drawing reference when I'm painting a dinosaur. I even took my Thrasher T-Rex with me to see JP when it was re-released in 2011. Yeah, so what? 8)

Plus if you're earning enough to spend $200 on one toy buy two. One to keep in the box and the other to rough house.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 01, 2013, 06:30:31 PM
Dude, the red Rex cost me $200. And that's only because I'm sacrificing buying other items of want. Besides, rough house? They're too precious to me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 01, 2013, 07:13:43 PM
I'm only kidding dude, you can do whatever you want. Love them in your own way ; )
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 01, 2013, 07:29:12 PM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/486818_10150609753815885_2082246218_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Mar 01, 2013, 07:30:55 PM
IS the fourth one happening or not? :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Mar 01, 2013, 07:41:19 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Mar 01, 2013, 07:30:55 PM
IS the fourth one happening or not? :(

It is happening. But they're quiet as f**k right now. Things are moving in the backstage. I wonder if they're going to make it to the announced June 2014 release date though. They've not announced a director yet. :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Mar 01, 2013, 09:03:31 PM
The writers behind it are the two people that wrote Rise of the Planet of the Apes, which I think they did a great job with. Hopefully they can help this franchise, like they did with the Pota franchise.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Mar 02, 2013, 12:27:08 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Mar 01, 2013, 07:29:12 PM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/486818_10150609753815885_2082246218_n.jpg)
Saved.
Title: A message to Jurassic Park fans.
Post by: Nychus on Mar 05, 2013, 09:17:26 AM
I still somewhat consider myself an entertainment geek and an artist of sorts. Since I first saw Jurassic Park at the big screen back at 1994 I've been dreaming of lots of things, one of them being the career of a film-making effect artist. As I've stated before a lot of that dreaming owes it's existence to creative geniuses like Stan Winston and Michael Crichton as well as the creatures that weren't some fictional aliens, dragons or unicorns but real living beings as tangible as a tiger or an elephant. I still write scripts occasionally and make drawings of my ideas because I enjoy the process. But lately my passion towards cinema as a format has taken a severe plummet. Explaining the reason behind that is far from simple because it would have to be directed towards groups of mixed moviegoers and fanatics who have their own personal reasons to love and hate movies. Yet it is worth addressing.

Let us start with a word that I believe anyone with a decent IQ understands well enough; storytelling. As a term it's meaning nowadays frustrates the heck out of me as a film fan. Stories have been around as long as humanity itself has existed, ranging from cave paintings and stone carvings to all sorts of writing. Humans are social creatures and their drive to communicate has travelled with them right to the modern day. There are many formats aside text that we utilize to express messages such as dance, comic books and moving images, the last one having evolved from being a mere recording of a living space to something that is way more technical.

I can't help but wonder where exactly our kind has gone so wrong as to nearly forgetting the actual art behind story in movies? Just what exactly do I mean with the claim? To try to demonstrate it I'm going to use some examples that apparently belong to the same genre as our beloved franchise.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NC6UW-I5nXc#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NC6UW-I5nXc#ws)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcc2hzHdL7o#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcc2hzHdL7o#ws)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZeWtfDsxXc#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZeWtfDsxXc#ws)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05nZFA2bf4g# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05nZFA2bf4g#)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmqSbpaVYZc# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmqSbpaVYZc#)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGSaL8Zw9rc#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGSaL8Zw9rc#ws)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxUwL4-qvtg# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxUwL4-qvtg#)

What am I trying to prove by showing these trailers? Why do I even bother saying anything? Well, from a personal standpoint the meaning behind them is disrespectful.......for all the wrong reasons. You see, there is a reason for why this kind of entertainment exists and a lot of the people who made it know it just as well as I do. A moronic demand leads to a moronic supply. It wouldn't surprise me if many of these film-makers actually originate from the audience that keeps paying money to watch this garbage, the biggest reason for why it remains garbage. You pay on garbage, you get garbage. Yeah, I just called it garbage, shame on me. I know that there are always people who are passionate in disagreeing with points that oppose their personal form of entertainment. But the thing is, not everyone can appreciate something that is essentially stupid the same way. Why? Not everyone has to enjoy stupidity to enjoy something. I must be a crazy troll for rejecting what is essentially a popular trend.

When it comes to potential, which one of the two do you prefer;

- Fascinating forms of prehistoric wildlife that do what the gene pool has made them do since their conceiving being encountered by flawed but competent human beings.
- Convenient, personality void killing machines encountered by convenient cannon fodder morons, red shirts and blow-up models that use them as target practice.

Does a good story really detract from the entertaining aspects of a movie? If something is boring or dumb to a target audience there is always a reason that should be learned. Let's assume that I was a guy who had an idea for a dinosaur movie, a really good idea too, and wanted to make it a reality. All of the bureaucratic effort aside, I would succeed in making the production happen. It wraps up and my beloved homage to what I grew up with has been filmed and given it's necessary special effects to make it sell. Right? As good as the idea and execution appears I suddenly find it all thrashed to bits by bored critics and childish people alike. Despite it raking in a decent amount of money in relation to it's budget I can't help but feel a tad let down by the whole ordeal as a passionate artist. What exactly went wrong, it all made sense on paper. It's not a terrible movie because I seriously put my heart behind the story and tried to be original. Eventually the question surfaces. Just who exactly was I trying to please with my product? There are so many different preferences for the same subject as society itself comprises of divided groups, in this case in a geekdom that you didn't expect to be as divided. So it appears that I merely forced my own view of a perfect dinosaur movie to the market and ended up colliding with the other perceptions of one.

Undeterred, I go back to the drawing board and spawn a sequel after doing research about those other group preferences to make sure that the execution fits them. The production wraps up and the new movie is released. Guess what? The same thrashing happens yet again and I quit as a film-maker. What went wrong this time? In trying to please those other tastes I completely forgot the importance of storytelling and ended up delivering something that only works as a forced gimmick to please a low denominator. This time a different question arose. Just what exactly was I trying to please?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fv516%2FDeinoslash%2Froflboll_zps5f9ea746.jpg&hash=19beacb8432b6a46f8a00132fa8e6005890440a3)

Lowest common denominators and gimmicks make storytelling a forced excuse in meaning, a disease that threatens to turn film to a disappointing shadow of what it can be. That kind of aim isn't exactly coherent. Yet that's what modern audiences pay for and the current young generations may have even grown up learning to treat the story of film as an excuse to justify such a gimmick. That fate lacks standard and we should all do our homework instead of running away from it.

My personal frustration thereby originates from something not wanting to translate to a person with different preferences. I love old school puppet effects, novels and visual artistry because even in their simpler form they still translate better to someone who grew up with them to appreciate them for what they are, nothing more and nothing less. I know that some will identically state their love of computer animation(I know not all of it is bad) and entertainment made by the likes of The Asylum which doesn't prove nor disprove the point that I'm trying to bring across.

Production quality alone doesn't make storytelling educated, only a good story. Past or present form, it's still the same problem. Audiences can and do lack standards. And those(now larger) audiences are what Hollywood and smaller companies alike deliver to. Why? Easy money from easy gimmicks. All too easy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYOYZLmK1sw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYOYZLmK1sw#ws)

What do you expect from movies? How do you want to be entertained? And at what cost?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Mar 05, 2013, 09:39:03 AM
Quote from: Nychus on Mar 05, 2013, 09:17:26 AM
I still somewhat consider myself an entertainment geek and an artist of sorts. Since I first saw Jurassic Park at the big screen back at 1994 I've been dreaming of lots of things, one of them being the career of a film-making effect artist. As I've stated before a lot of that dreaming owes it's existence to creative geniuses like Stan Winston and Michael Crichton as well as the creatures that weren't some fictional aliens, dragons or unicorns but real living beings as tangible as a tiger or an elephant. I still write scripts occasionally and make drawings of my ideas because I enjoy the process. But lately my passion towards cinema as a format has taken a severe plummet. Explaining the reason behind that is far from simple because it would have to be directed towards groups of mixed moviegoers and fanatics who have their own personal reasons to love and hate movies. Yet it is worth addressing.

Let us start with a word that I believe anyone with a decent IQ understands well enough; storytelling. As a term it's meaning nowadays frustrates the heck out of me as a film fan. Stories have been around as long as humanity itself has existed, ranging from cave paintings and stone carvings to all sorts of writing. Humans are social creatures and their drive to communicate has travelled with them right to the modern day. There are many formats aside text that we utilize to express messages such as dance, comic books and moving images, the last one having evolved from being a mere recording of a living space to something that is way more technical.

I can't help but wonder where exactly our kind has gone so wrong as to nearly forgetting the actual art behind story in movies? Just what exactly do I mean with the claim? To try to demonstrate it I'm going to use some examples that apparently belong to the same genre as our beloved franchise.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NC6UW-I5nXc#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NC6UW-I5nXc#ws)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcc2hzHdL7o#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcc2hzHdL7o#ws)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZeWtfDsxXc#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZeWtfDsxXc#ws)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05nZFA2bf4g# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05nZFA2bf4g#)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmqSbpaVYZc# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmqSbpaVYZc#)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGSaL8Zw9rc#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGSaL8Zw9rc#ws)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxUwL4-qvtg# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxUwL4-qvtg#)

What am I trying to prove by showing these trailers? Why do I even bother saying anything? Well, from a personal standpoint the meaning behind them is disrespectful.......for all the wrong reasons. You see, there is a reason for why this kind of entertainment exists and a lot of the people who made it know it just as well as I do. A moronic demand leads to a moronic supply. It wouldn't surprise me if many of these film-makers actually originate from the audience that keeps paying money to watch this garbage, the biggest reason for why it remains garbage. You pay on garbage, you get garbage. Yeah, I just called it garbage, shame on me. I know that there are always people who are passionate in disagreeing with points that oppose their personal form of entertainment. But the thing is, not everyone can appreciate something that is essentially stupid the same way. Why? Not everyone has to enjoy stupidity to enjoy something. I must be a crazy troll for rejecting what is essentially a popular trend.

When it comes to potential, which one of the two do you prefer;

- Fascinating forms of prehistoric wildlife that do what the gene pool has made them do since their conceiving being encountered by flawed but competent human beings.
- Convenient, personality void killing machines encountered by convenient cannon fodder morons, red shirts and blow-up models that use them as target practice.

Does a good story really detract from the entertaining aspects of a movie? If something is boring or dumb to a target audience there is always a reason that should be learned. Let's assume that I was a guy who had an idea for a dinosaur movie, a really good idea too, and wanted to make it a reality. All of the bureaucratic effort aside, I would succeed in making the production happen. It wraps up and my beloved homage to what I grew up with has been filmed and given it's necessary special effects to make it sell. Right? As good as the idea and execution appears I suddenly find it all thrashed to bits by bored critics and childish people alike. Despite it raking in a decent amount of money in relation to it's budget I can't help but feel a tad let down by the whole ordeal as a passionate artist. What exactly went wrong, it all made sense on paper. It's not a terrible movie because I seriously put my heart behind the story and tried to be original. Eventually the question surfaces. Just who exactly was I trying to please with my product? There are so many different preferences for the same subject as society itself comprises of divided groups, in this case in a geekdom that you didn't expect to be as divided. So it appears that I merely forced my own view of a perfect dinosaur movie to the market and ended up colliding with the other perceptions of one.

Undeterred, I go back to the drawing board and spawn a sequel after doing research about those other group preferences to make sure that the execution fits them. The production wraps up and the new movie is released. Guess what? The same thrashing happens yet again and I quit as a film-maker. What went wrong this time? In trying to please those other tastes I completely forgot the importance of storytelling and ended up delivering something that only works as a forced gimmick to please a low denominator. This time a different question arose. Just what exactly was I trying to please?

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v516/Deinoslash/roflboll_zps5f9ea746.jpg

Lowest common denominators and gimmicks make storytelling a forced excuse in meaning, a disease that threatens to turn film to a disappointing shadow of what it can be. That kind of aim isn't exactly coherent. Yet that's what modern audiences pay for and the current young generations may have even grown up learning to treat the story of film as an excuse to justify such a gimmick. That fate lacks standard and we should all do our homework instead of running away from it.

My personal frustration thereby originates from something not wanting to translate to a person with different preferences. I love old school puppet effects, novels and visual artistry because even in their simpler form they still translate better to someone who grew up with them to appreciate them for what they are, nothing more and nothing less. I know that some will identically state their love of computer animation(I know not all of it is bad) and entertainment made by the likes of The Asylum which doesn't prove nor disprove the point that I'm trying to bring across.

Production quality alone doesn't make storytelling educated, only a good story. Past or present form, it's still the same problem. Audiences can and do lack standards. And those(now larger) audiences are what Hollywood and smaller companies alike deliver to. Why? Easy money from easy gimmicks. All too easy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYOYZLmK1sw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYOYZLmK1sw#ws)

What do you expect from movies? How do you want to be entertained? And at what cost?

This would make for a good article in a specialized site.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 06, 2013, 03:54:04 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Mar 01, 2013, 07:29:12 PM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/486818_10150609753815885_2082246218_n.jpg)

Awesome.
Title: Re: A message to Jurassic Park fans.
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 06, 2013, 04:01:36 AM
Quote from: Nychus on Mar 05, 2013, 09:17:26 AM
I still somewhat consider myself an entertainment geek and an artist of sorts. Since I first saw Jurassic Park at the big screen back at 1994 I've been dreaming of lots of things, one of them being the career of a film-making effect artist. As I've stated before a lot of that dreaming owes it's existence to creative geniuses like Stan Winston and Michael Crichton as well as the creatures that weren't some fictional aliens, dragons or unicorns but real living beings as tangible as a tiger or an elephant. I still write scripts occasionally and make drawings of my ideas because I enjoy the process. But lately my passion towards cinema as a format has taken a severe plummet. Explaining the reason behind that is far from simple because it would have to be directed towards groups of mixed moviegoers and fanatics who have their own personal reasons to love and hate movies. Yet it is worth addressing.

Let us start with a word that I believe anyone with a decent IQ understands well enough; storytelling. As a term it's meaning nowadays frustrates the heck out of me as a film fan. Stories have been around as long as humanity itself has existed, ranging from cave paintings and stone carvings to all sorts of writing. Humans are social creatures and their drive to communicate has travelled with them right to the modern day. There are many formats aside text that we utilize to express messages such as dance, comic books and moving images, the last one having evolved from being a mere recording of a living space to something that is way more technical.

I can't help but wonder where exactly our kind has gone so wrong as to nearly forgetting the actual art behind story in movies? Just what exactly do I mean with the claim? To try to demonstrate it I'm going to use some examples that apparently belong to the same genre as our beloved franchise.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NC6UW-I5nXc#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NC6UW-I5nXc#ws)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcc2hzHdL7o#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcc2hzHdL7o#ws)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZeWtfDsxXc#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZeWtfDsxXc#ws)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05nZFA2bf4g# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05nZFA2bf4g#)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmqSbpaVYZc# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmqSbpaVYZc#)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGSaL8Zw9rc#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGSaL8Zw9rc#ws)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxUwL4-qvtg# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxUwL4-qvtg#)

What am I trying to prove by showing these trailers? Why do I even bother saying anything? Well, from a personal standpoint the meaning behind them is disrespectful.......for all the wrong reasons. You see, there is a reason for why this kind of entertainment exists and a lot of the people who made it know it just as well as I do. A moronic demand leads to a moronic supply. It wouldn't surprise me if many of these film-makers actually originate from the audience that keeps paying money to watch this garbage, the biggest reason for why it remains garbage. You pay on garbage, you get garbage. Yeah, I just called it garbage, shame on me. I know that there are always people who are passionate in disagreeing with points that oppose their personal form of entertainment. But the thing is, not everyone can appreciate something that is essentially stupid the same way. Why? Not everyone has to enjoy stupidity to enjoy something. I must be a crazy troll for rejecting what is essentially a popular trend.

When it comes to potential, which one of the two do you prefer;

- Fascinating forms of prehistoric wildlife that do what the gene pool has made them do since their conceiving being encountered by flawed but competent human beings.
- Convenient, personality void killing machines encountered by convenient cannon fodder morons, red shirts and blow-up models that use them as target practice.

Does a good story really detract from the entertaining aspects of a movie? If something is boring or dumb to a target audience there is always a reason that should be learned. Let's assume that I was a guy who had an idea for a dinosaur movie, a really good idea too, and wanted to make it a reality. All of the bureaucratic effort aside, I would succeed in making the production happen. It wraps up and my beloved homage to what I grew up with has been filmed and given it's necessary special effects to make it sell. Right? As good as the idea and execution appears I suddenly find it all thrashed to bits by bored critics and childish people alike. Despite it raking in a decent amount of money in relation to it's budget I can't help but feel a tad let down by the whole ordeal as a passionate artist. What exactly went wrong, it all made sense on paper. It's not a terrible movie because I seriously put my heart behind the story and tried to be original. Eventually the question surfaces. Just who exactly was I trying to please with my product? There are so many different preferences for the same subject as society itself comprises of divided groups, in this case in a geekdom that you didn't expect to be as divided. So it appears that I merely forced my own view of a perfect dinosaur movie to the market and ended up colliding with the other perceptions of one.

Undeterred, I go back to the drawing board and spawn a sequel after doing research about those other group preferences to make sure that the execution fits them. The production wraps up and the new movie is released. Guess what? The same thrashing happens yet again and I quit as a film-maker. What went wrong this time? In trying to please those other tastes I completely forgot the importance of storytelling and ended up delivering something that only works as a forced gimmick to please a low denominator. This time a different question arose. Just what exactly was I trying to please?

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v516/Deinoslash/roflboll_zps5f9ea746.jpg

Lowest common denominators and gimmicks make storytelling a forced excuse in meaning, a disease that threatens to turn film to a disappointing shadow of what it can be. That kind of aim isn't exactly coherent. Yet that's what modern audiences pay for and the current young generations may have even grown up learning to treat the story of film as an excuse to justify such a gimmick. That fate lacks standard and we should all do our homework instead of running away from it.

My personal frustration thereby originates from something not wanting to translate to a person with different preferences. I love old school puppet effects, novels and visual artistry because even in their simpler form they still translate better to someone who grew up with them to appreciate them for what they are, nothing more and nothing less. I know that some will identically state their love of computer animation(I know not all of it is bad) and entertainment made by the likes of The Asylum which doesn't prove nor disprove the point that I'm trying to bring across.

Production quality alone doesn't make storytelling educated, only a good story. Past or present form, it's still the same problem. Audiences can and do lack standards. And those(now larger) audiences are what Hollywood and smaller companies alike deliver to. Why? Easy money from easy gimmicks. All too easy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYOYZLmK1sw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYOYZLmK1sw#ws)

What do you expect from movies? How do you want to be entertained? And at what cost?

You can say this about any film, not just dinosaur movies. There are lousy films made for brainless entertainment IMO across all genres.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Mar 06, 2013, 09:39:53 PM
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/576226_526340760744145_1517477671_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Mar 06, 2013, 09:55:38 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fnataliaantonova.files.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F03%2Fthats-one-big-pile-of-shit.gif&hash=0f2e5efa1efc0b86dca85c08d0c9152e0a6ce46c)

And I'd rather stick my hands in it than getting sneezed in the face. At least you're wearing gloves.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 06, 2013, 10:05:24 PM
Not to mention Lex's mouth was a little open so she probably swallowed some of the stuff.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Mar 06, 2013, 10:24:37 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 06, 2013, 10:05:24 PM
Not to mention Lex's mouth was a little open so she probably swallowed some of the stuff.

and thus Dinosaur DX spread to humans...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Mar 06, 2013, 11:47:52 PM
Quote from: Gate on Mar 06, 2013, 10:24:37 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 06, 2013, 10:05:24 PM
Not to mention Lex's mouth was a little open so she probably swallowed some of the stuff.

and thus Dinosaur DX spread to humans...

Wouldn't that be mad cow disease?
:edit: and I think Lex would have to actually eat the Brachiosaurus...

But yes, lolcopter roflskates etc.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 06, 2013, 11:52:21 PM
Gate, how do we know Universal wasn't going to use that as a background explanation for the failed human/dino hybrids?

DUN DUN DUNNNNN
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 07, 2013, 02:19:52 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 06, 2013, 11:52:21 PM
Gate, how do we know Universal wasn't going to use that as a background explanation for the failed human/dino hybrids?

DUN DUN DUNNNNN

No...no...NOOOOOOOOO!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 07, 2013, 06:07:49 AM
Quote from: Shasvre on Mar 06, 2013, 09:55:38 PM
http://nataliaantonova.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/thats-one-big-pile-of-shit.gif

And I'd rather stick my hands in it than getting sneezed in the face. At least you're wearing gloves.
Precicsely what I was going to say.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Mar 07, 2013, 11:00:01 AM
Jurassic Park 4 to return to Nublar?

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=20 (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=20)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Mar 07, 2013, 11:11:02 AM
"At the time we have no comment" directly says that they've been contacted but asked not to talk about it, otherwise the person would probably just be taken aback by the question.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 07, 2013, 11:17:07 AM
Well, we got 2 films in Sorna, now we'll have 2 films in Nublar. :P Now bring back Malcolm to balance things up... bring back the awesome. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Mar 07, 2013, 11:44:11 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Mar 07, 2013, 11:11:02 AM
"At the time we have no comment" directly says that they've been contacted but asked not to talk about it, otherwise the person would probably just be taken aback by the question.

Yeah, it always works like that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 07, 2013, 12:20:22 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Mar 07, 2013, 11:00:01 AM
Jurassic Park 4 to return to Nublar?

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=20 (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=20)

If that's true...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-NmBPErLl_Xw%2FTjl7loVtrII%2FAAAAAAAAA5E%2FuGW_GQW5qWw%2Fs1600%2Fbc11.jpeg&hash=ce5d2c5401cb6c2635540a65e5e16374be1e9c63)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Mar 07, 2013, 12:48:06 PM
Well, I guess Universal wants to retcon the game now.
Title: Re: A message to Jurassic Park fans.
Post by: Nychus on Mar 07, 2013, 02:52:01 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 06, 2013, 04:01:36 AM
Quote from: Nychus on Mar 05, 2013, 09:17:26 AM
I still somewhat consider myself an entertainment geek and an artist of sorts. Since I first saw Jurassic Park at the big screen back at 1994 I've been dreaming of lots of things, one of them being the career of a film-making effect artist. As I've stated before a lot of that dreaming owes it's existence to creative geniuses like Stan Winston and Michael Crichton as well as the creatures that weren't some fictional aliens, dragons or unicorns but real living beings as tangible as a tiger or an elephant. I still write scripts occasionally and make drawings of my ideas because I enjoy the process. But lately my passion towards cinema as a format has taken a severe plummet. Explaining the reason behind that is far from simple because it would have to be directed towards groups of mixed moviegoers and fanatics who have their own personal reasons to love and hate movies. Yet it is worth addressing.

Let us start with a word that I believe anyone with a decent IQ understands well enough; storytelling. As a term it's meaning nowadays frustrates the heck out of me as a film fan. Stories have been around as long as humanity itself has existed, ranging from cave paintings and stone carvings to all sorts of writing. Humans are social creatures and their drive to communicate has travelled with them right to the modern day. There are many formats aside text that we utilize to express messages such as dance, comic books and moving images, the last one having evolved from being a mere recording of a living space to something that is way more technical.

I can't help but wonder where exactly our kind has gone so wrong as to nearly forgetting the actual art behind story in movies? Just what exactly do I mean with the claim? To try to demonstrate it I'm going to use some examples that apparently belong to the same genre as our beloved franchise.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NC6UW-I5nXc#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NC6UW-I5nXc#ws)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcc2hzHdL7o#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcc2hzHdL7o#ws)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZeWtfDsxXc#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZeWtfDsxXc#ws)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05nZFA2bf4g# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05nZFA2bf4g#)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmqSbpaVYZc# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmqSbpaVYZc#)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGSaL8Zw9rc#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGSaL8Zw9rc#ws)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxUwL4-qvtg# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxUwL4-qvtg#)

What am I trying to prove by showing these trailers? Why do I even bother saying anything? Well, from a personal standpoint the meaning behind them is disrespectful.......for all the wrong reasons. You see, there is a reason for why this kind of entertainment exists and a lot of the people who made it know it just as well as I do. A moronic demand leads to a moronic supply. It wouldn't surprise me if many of these film-makers actually originate from the audience that keeps paying money to watch this garbage, the biggest reason for why it remains garbage. You pay on garbage, you get garbage. Yeah, I just called it garbage, shame on me. I know that there are always people who are passionate in disagreeing with points that oppose their personal form of entertainment. But the thing is, not everyone can appreciate something that is essentially stupid the same way. Why? Not everyone has to enjoy stupidity to enjoy something. I must be a crazy troll for rejecting what is essentially a popular trend.

When it comes to potential, which one of the two do you prefer;

- Fascinating forms of prehistoric wildlife that do what the gene pool has made them do since their conceiving being encountered by flawed but competent human beings.
- Convenient, personality void killing machines encountered by convenient cannon fodder morons, red shirts and blow-up models that use them as target practice.

Does a good story really detract from the entertaining aspects of a movie? If something is boring or dumb to a target audience there is always a reason that should be learned. Let's assume that I was a guy who had an idea for a dinosaur movie, a really good idea too, and wanted to make it a reality. All of the bureaucratic effort aside, I would succeed in making the production happen. It wraps up and my beloved homage to what I grew up with has been filmed and given it's necessary special effects to make it sell. Right? As good as the idea and execution appears I suddenly find it all thrashed to bits by bored critics and childish people alike. Despite it raking in a decent amount of money in relation to it's budget I can't help but feel a tad let down by the whole ordeal as a passionate artist. What exactly went wrong, it all made sense on paper. It's not a terrible movie because I seriously put my heart behind the story and tried to be original. Eventually the question surfaces. Just who exactly was I trying to please with my product? There are so many different preferences for the same subject as society itself comprises of divided groups, in this case in a geekdom that you didn't expect to be as divided. So it appears that I merely forced my own view of a perfect dinosaur movie to the market and ended up colliding with the other perceptions of one.

Undeterred, I go back to the drawing board and spawn a sequel after doing research about those other group preferences to make sure that the execution fits them. The production wraps up and the new movie is released. Guess what? The same thrashing happens yet again and I quit as a film-maker. What went wrong this time? In trying to please those other tastes I completely forgot the importance of storytelling and ended up delivering something that only works as a forced gimmick to please a low denominator. This time a different question arose. Just what exactly was I trying to please?

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v516/Deinoslash/roflboll_zps5f9ea746.jpg

Lowest common denominators and gimmicks make storytelling a forced excuse in meaning, a disease that threatens to turn film to a disappointing shadow of what it can be. That kind of aim isn't exactly coherent. Yet that's what modern audiences pay for and the current young generations may have even grown up learning to treat the story of film as an excuse to justify such a gimmick. That fate lacks standard and we should all do our homework instead of running away from it.

My personal frustration thereby originates from something not wanting to translate to a person with different preferences. I love old school puppet effects, novels and visual artistry because even in their simpler form they still translate better to someone who grew up with them to appreciate them for what they are, nothing more and nothing less. I know that some will identically state their love of computer animation(I know not all of it is bad) and entertainment made by the likes of The Asylum which doesn't prove nor disprove the point that I'm trying to bring across.

Production quality alone doesn't make storytelling educated, only a good story. Past or present form, it's still the same problem. Audiences can and do lack standards. And those(now larger) audiences are what Hollywood and smaller companies alike deliver to. Why? Easy money from easy gimmicks. All too easy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYOYZLmK1sw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYOYZLmK1sw#ws)

What do you expect from movies? How do you want to be entertained? And at what cost?

You can say this about any film, not just dinosaur movies. There are lousy films made for brainless entertainment IMO across all genres.
Exactly.  ::)

Jurassic Park 4's quality can be threatened if the film-makers lean too much in the usual pleasing of a low denominator which I think whoever wrote the script as well as the person who ends up directing it should remember to avoid in order to not only be original but also translate the character-driven chemistry over to the audience successfully. What we definitely don't need is more idiot scientists. Probably unavoidable but still, it's not wrong for someone who enjoyed the first movie to have some standards in terms of expectation.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 07, 2013, 09:47:31 PM
More goodies arrived today!!! My Series II human figure set is almost complete.

http://instagram.com/p/WkkDrvlEmH/ (http://instagram.com/p/WkkDrvlEmH/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Mar 10, 2013, 09:49:49 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BFBqURvCQAACprs.png)

Waant.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 10, 2013, 09:52:54 PM
Yup yup!! Hopefully gonna grab them sometime next week. I've asked Toys R Us thrice now in the past three days when they're coming, rofl.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nychus on Mar 11, 2013, 03:06:45 PM
There was also supposed to be two other dinosaurs, Carnotaurus and Stegosaurus. Rumors state that they are planned in a second wave. These new sculpts might see many repaints in any case especially since the fourth movie is supposed to premiere next year.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 11, 2013, 03:53:53 PM
Nice, but not really digging the "chaos effect" paint app.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 11, 2013, 04:53:15 PM
Quote from: Nychus on Mar 11, 2013, 03:06:45 PM
There was also supposed to be two other dinosaurs, Carnotaurus and Stegosaurus. Rumors state that they are planned in a second wave. These new sculpts might see many repaints in any case especially since the fourth movie is supposed to premiere next year.

Oh man, I hope not. Hasbro has released enough repaints in previous lines. I want a vintage Series 1 release dangnabbit!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 11, 2013, 09:20:04 PM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/577798_544447682256806_1536755125_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Mar 11, 2013, 09:22:05 PM
Cool. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 11, 2013, 09:43:36 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Mar 11, 2013, 09:20:04 PM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/577798_544447682256806_1536755125_n.jpg)

Was just about to post that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 11, 2013, 09:45:44 PM
Quote from: Nychus on Mar 11, 2013, 03:06:45 PM
There was also supposed to be two other dinosaurs, Carnotaurus and Stegosaurus. Rumors state that they are planned in a second wave. These new sculpts might see many repaints in any case especially since the fourth movie is supposed to premiere next year.

If the Carnotaurus and Stegosaurus are repaints from the first movie toys.... WIN.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 12, 2013, 02:36:55 AM
They're not, they'll be leftover moulds from the cancelled 2011 JP line. See here:

http://www.jptoys.com/toy-database/jurassic-park-2011/index.htm (http://www.jptoys.com/toy-database/jurassic-park-2011/index.htm)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 12, 2013, 02:45:59 PM
Thanks :) Shame it aint the originals... but those arent bad sculpts though....
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: irn on Mar 12, 2013, 03:17:05 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi49.tinypic.com%2F2njj0nm.jpg&hash=80e44038f90c9d77e6dd1ff99d7cb269c95e71df)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 12, 2013, 05:00:11 PM
I just started Jurassic Park Builder, and it's fun! Finally! A good game app on my kindle!  Recommend it if you haven't played it yet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 12, 2013, 05:02:42 PM
Quote from: irn on Mar 12, 2013, 03:17:05 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi49.tinypic.com%2F2njj0nm.jpg&hash=80e44038f90c9d77e6dd1ff99d7cb269c95e71df)

So that's what the full image looks like. I'm correct in only seeing the top half of a raptor body suit?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 12, 2013, 07:55:21 PM
I think so, yes. Either that or the animatronic rig.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naissus on Mar 12, 2013, 07:58:51 PM
I wonder if the next movie will be influenced by the science involved in researching atavism.  If done right,  it could help in evolving the storyline.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Mar 12, 2013, 07:59:44 PM
JP 3D is coming out the same weekend as Evil Dead. I is conflicted.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PVTDukeMorrison on Mar 12, 2013, 08:09:25 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Mar 12, 2013, 07:59:44 PM
JP 3D is coming out the same weekend as Evil Dead. I is conflicted.
Double Feature
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Mar 12, 2013, 09:55:16 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_JP2AQg1CA#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_JP2AQg1CA#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQkA1h1ZESc#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQkA1h1ZESc#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Mar 12, 2013, 10:01:24 PM
Just a few short weeks now. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 12, 2013, 10:10:41 PM
"Must go faster" :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Mar 12, 2013, 10:17:17 PM
God I need to see this. One of my all time favorite movies, and in 3D no less.

I want it so f**king much.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Mar 13, 2013, 12:25:45 AM
Holy shit it feels like a new movie coming out.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 13, 2013, 12:33:12 AM
Quote from: MrSpaceJockey on Mar 13, 2013, 12:25:45 AM
Holy shit it feels like a new movie coming out.

f**king A, right? I want those new toys too...dammit TRU, why must your shipments come in so slowly :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 13, 2013, 02:03:25 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Mar 12, 2013, 09:55:16 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_JP2AQg1CA#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_JP2AQg1CA#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQkA1h1ZESc#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQkA1h1ZESc#ws)

THIS SHIT BETTER MAKE A LOT OF MONEY!!!  SO PUMPED!!!!!!!!



Holy man!!!!

Jurassic Park 4 Starts Filming This April in Baton Rouge?

http://www.jurassicpark4-movie.com/news/624 (http://www.jurassicpark4-movie.com/news/624)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 13, 2013, 02:40:11 AM
I hope the logo I saw on that site isn't the official one. I like my "lined letters".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Mar 13, 2013, 02:47:34 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 13, 2013, 02:40:11 AM
I hope the logo I saw on that site isn't the official one. I like my "lined letters".

Like a vertical line across the IV or IIII?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 13, 2013, 03:10:05 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn2.planetminecraft.com%2Ffiles%2Fresource_media%2Fscreenshot%2F1138%2Fjurassic-park1_481597.jpg&hash=54acb3717f4f7baaf13a6c68b10596f6d7a7c3f1)

The lines inside the letters.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Mar 13, 2013, 03:23:28 AM
Me too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 13, 2013, 09:08:03 AM
Stupid 3D release not out in the UK until August!  >:(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Mar 13, 2013, 09:38:59 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 13, 2013, 02:03:25 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Mar 12, 2013, 09:55:16 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_JP2AQg1CA#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_JP2AQg1CA#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQkA1h1ZESc#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQkA1h1ZESc#ws)

THIS SHIT BETTER MAKE A LOT OF MONEY!!!  SO PUMPED!!!!!!!!



Holy man!!!!

Jurassic Park 4 Starts Filming This April in Baton Rouge?

http://www.jurassicpark4-movie.com/news/624 (http://www.jurassicpark4-movie.com/news/624)

If that's true, casting has to be happening already and they have chosen a director already. But I'm holding out for official word on the subject.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Mar 13, 2013, 11:35:52 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 13, 2013, 09:08:03 AM
Stupid 3D release not out in the UK until August!  >:(

Seriously? Grrrrrrrrrrr.  >:(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Mar 13, 2013, 11:37:14 AM
Quote from: Taxemic on Mar 13, 2013, 11:35:52 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 13, 2013, 09:08:03 AM
Stupid 3D release not out in the UK until August!  >:(

Seriously? Grrrrrrrrrrr.  >:(

Eh, same for me here in Spain. :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 13, 2013, 01:49:43 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Mar 13, 2013, 09:38:59 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 13, 2013, 02:03:25 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Mar 12, 2013, 09:55:16 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_JP2AQg1CA#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_JP2AQg1CA#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQkA1h1ZESc#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQkA1h1ZESc#ws)

THIS SHIT BETTER MAKE A LOT OF MONEY!!!  SO PUMPED!!!!!!!!



Holy man!!!!

Jurassic Park 4 Starts Filming This April in Baton Rouge?

http://www.jurassicpark4-movie.com/news/624 (http://www.jurassicpark4-movie.com/news/624)

If that's true, casting has to be happening already and they have chosen a director already. But I'm holding out for official word on the subject.

Another site was speculating that some, if not, all the original cast members may have already signed on a while ago.  Maybe that's why we got those, "you never know!" responses from them?  And I can only assume that Joe Johnston would be at the helm again since he was so involved with it before they made the release announcement.  I would have no problem with that.  I can only hope they get Don Davis back on for the score since I'm sure Williams won't return.

By the way, for those of you getting the 3D rerelease in August, my condolences.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Mar 13, 2013, 09:15:29 PM
can't wait for this scene in 3D, lol

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/392918_529584330419788_2062903821_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 13, 2013, 09:55:50 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Mar 13, 2013, 09:15:29 PM
can't wait for this scene in 3D, lol
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/392918_529584330419788_2062903821_n.jpg)

yes!



Great big news coming up!

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=22 (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=22)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 14, 2013, 01:21:57 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 13, 2013, 09:08:03 AM
Stupid 3D release not out in the UK until August!  >:(

You should live here in your former colony ;D 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Mar 14, 2013, 03:08:52 AM
Thought you would like this Doom:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm2.static.flickr.com%2F1207%2F1438572588_9c462ee9b7.jpg%3Fv%3D1190733829&hash=aafa8b4c76dce1a4a887f39c07ab187be0f16890)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 14, 2013, 03:12:24 AM
Thanks, but not really. I'm not a fan of Papo's Rex and Spinosaurus. They're too Jurassic Park-influenced.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Mar 14, 2013, 03:24:59 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 14, 2013, 03:12:24 AM
Thanks, but not really. I'm not a fan of Papo's Rex and Spinosaurus. They're too Jurassic Park-influenced.

I did not know. Thought they were actual JP toys.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 14, 2013, 03:31:06 AM
I'm not surprised. That's why I said they're too JP-influenced.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 14, 2013, 06:32:08 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 14, 2013, 03:12:24 AM
Thanks, but not really. I'm not a fan of Papo's Rex and Spinosaurus. They're too Jurassic Park-influenced.

How the hell is that a problem for you?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 14, 2013, 07:04:22 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Mar 14, 2013, 03:08:52 AM
Thought you would like this Doom:

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1207/1438572588_9c462ee9b7.jpg?v=1190733829
Proud owner of that f**ker.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 14, 2013, 08:09:53 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 14, 2013, 06:32:08 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 14, 2013, 03:12:24 AM
Thanks, but not really. I'm not a fan of Papo's Rex and Spinosaurus. They're too Jurassic Park-influenced.

How the hell is that a problem for you?

Papo toys are supposed to be educational. Hardly the case if the designs are paleontologically-inaccurate.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 14, 2013, 02:08:40 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 14, 2013, 08:09:53 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 14, 2013, 06:32:08 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 14, 2013, 03:12:24 AM
Thanks, but not really. I'm not a fan of Papo's Rex and Spinosaurus. They're too Jurassic Park-influenced.

How the hell is that a problem for you?

Papo toys are supposed to be educational. Hardly the case if the designs are paleontologically-inaccurate.

Fair enough but they should be in everyone's JP collection, they're amazing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Mar 14, 2013, 02:24:35 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 13, 2013, 09:55:50 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Mar 13, 2013, 09:15:29 PM
can't wait for this scene in 3D, lol
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/392918_529584330419788_2062903821_n.jpg)

yes!



Great big news coming up!

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=22 (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=22)

And here we... GO!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 14, 2013, 04:18:14 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 14, 2013, 02:08:40 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 14, 2013, 08:09:53 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 14, 2013, 06:32:08 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 14, 2013, 03:12:24 AM
Thanks, but not really. I'm not a fan of Papo's Rex and Spinosaurus. They're too Jurassic Park-influenced.

How the hell is that a problem for you?

Papo toys are supposed to be educational. Hardly the case if the designs are paleontologically-inaccurate.

Fair enough but they should be in everyone's JP collection, they're amazing.

Exactly!



Is Jurassic Park 4's Secret Director Actually Steven Spielberg?

http://www.bleedingcool.com/2013/03/14/is-jurassic-park-4s-secret-director-actually-steven-spielberg/ (http://www.bleedingcool.com/2013/03/14/is-jurassic-park-4s-secret-director-actually-steven-spielberg/)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 14, 2013, 05:21:39 PM
Fingers f**king crossed its Spielberg!

However Frank Marshall would be a great second choice.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Mar 14, 2013, 05:23:19 PM
That makes sense, actually.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 14, 2013, 05:45:17 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 14, 2013, 02:08:40 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 14, 2013, 08:09:53 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 14, 2013, 06:32:08 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 14, 2013, 03:12:24 AM
Thanks, but not really. I'm not a fan of Papo's Rex and Spinosaurus. They're too Jurassic Park-influenced.

How the hell is that a problem for you?

Papo toys are supposed to be educational. Hardly the case if the designs are paleontologically-inaccurate.

Fair enough but they should be in everyone's JP collection, they're amazing.

Eh, I'd rather buy Carnegie models. Those are more exciting to me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 14, 2013, 05:46:31 PM
You crazy. :-*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 14, 2013, 05:56:14 PM
NO U

And I want Stevie to return as well to the director's chair. He knows his JP.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 14, 2013, 05:58:27 PM
Yeah man, I hope the 4th outing is as good as TLW.
Nothing will top the original, we all know that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Mar 14, 2013, 06:06:57 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 14, 2013, 05:58:27 PM
Yeah man, I hope the 4th outing is as good as TLW.
Nothing will top the original, we all know that.

Pretty much this. I greatly enjoy TLW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Mar 14, 2013, 08:17:01 PM
How much you wanna bet the Jurassic Park 4 teaser may show up in JP3D?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Mar 14, 2013, 08:58:20 PM
Alex Billington ‏@firstshowing

Holy shit. Safety Not Guaranteed's Colin Trevorrow is directing Jurassic Park 4? So THAT was the big fanboy property he was talking about!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 14, 2013, 09:03:54 PM
Can't say I've ever seen anything of his.

I was kind of hoping that Joe Johnston would get another shot at JP. But  if this is true, I hope that that frees Johnston up for a Star Wars project.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 14, 2013, 09:05:23 PM
Whoa whoa whoa. Bring it. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 14, 2013, 09:13:51 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Mar 14, 2013, 08:58:20 PM
Alex Billington ‏@firstshowing

Holy shit. Safety Not Guaranteed's Colin Trevorrow is directing Jurassic Park 4? So THAT was the big fanboy property he was talking about!

He's a nobody. but then again, so was Spielberg when he directed Jaws.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Mar 14, 2013, 09:21:14 PM
He's a nice nobody. I hope he does good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Mar 14, 2013, 09:27:00 PM
His last movie got great reviews:  Safety Not Guaranteed
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Mar 14, 2013, 09:33:20 PM
Safety Not Guaranteed was a f**king great movie; one of my favorites from last year.

I'm surprised and very happy with the choice. Colin's one of those guys that I hope goes far.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Mar 14, 2013, 09:37:20 PM
I'm pretty sure he's very aware of the fact this is the movie that can launch him into Hollywood glory or stigmatize his career. Dat pressure.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 14, 2013, 10:04:02 PM
Well, I guess I have to check out this guy's movie then.  He better do f**king great with this!  If they say he's a huge fanboy and his last film recieved good reviews, then lets f**king do this right, bruh!

Also feel kind of bad for Joe Johnston since he was so involved with the development of this.  Maybe he'll serve as co-producer?

Also, since I'm sure they won't get Don Davis back on for the score, and obviously not JW, I really think David Hirschfelder could capture John Williams' sound.  Just listen to his score for Legend of the Guardians: The Owls of Ga'Hoole.

One more thing, I think this article SLIGHTLY CONFIRMS the return of vet Jurassic Park actors, where it says they felt he could preserve and protect the characters in the story.  Here's f**king hoping!...

http://www.deadline.com/2013/03/colin-trevorrow-to-helm-jurassic-park-4-for-universal-and-steven-spielberg/ (http://www.deadline.com/2013/03/colin-trevorrow-to-helm-jurassic-park-4-for-universal-and-steven-spielberg/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 14, 2013, 10:12:32 PM
I always have the original so BRING IT Trevorrow! ;D

So excited!!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 14, 2013, 10:14:51 PM
Here's hoping for something good. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Mar 14, 2013, 10:19:33 PM
Can't wait for the casting news to start surfacing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Mar 14, 2013, 10:33:21 PM
I'm pleased that a lot of people are talking positively about the fact that a new director is being trusted with such a huge movie. Paired with the screenwriter choices, I'm finally optimistic about this movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 14, 2013, 10:35:13 PM
Great choice for the director. Since they got the writer of Rise of Planet of the Apes and a director of Safety Not Guaranteed then I'm pretty sure we are going to get a great film.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alienseseses on Mar 14, 2013, 10:36:20 PM
10 year old me is pleased.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gazz on Mar 14, 2013, 10:38:44 PM
Loved Safety Not Guaranteed. I'm so in!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Mar 14, 2013, 10:42:10 PM
My interest in this has rose.

I feel like I need more info but at least I'm not skeptical at the moment.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Feral_PRED on Mar 14, 2013, 10:56:21 PM
I'm so happy right now!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Mar 14, 2013, 11:37:23 PM
He's apparently been on board for a good while now. I'm reading that he started teasing it back in November.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 14, 2013, 11:49:37 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Mar 14, 2013, 11:37:23 PM
He's apparently been on board for a good while now. I'm reading that he started teasing it back in November.

Read that too.  That must mean they already have a good portion of the cast already set.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PVTDukeMorrison on Mar 14, 2013, 11:52:22 PM
I hope Sam Neil and Jeff Goldblum make a return
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 14, 2013, 11:53:35 PM
Quote from: PVTDukeMorrison on Mar 14, 2013, 11:52:22 PM
I hope Sam Neil and Jeff Goldblum make a return

Basically this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 14, 2013, 11:57:34 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 14, 2013, 11:49:37 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Mar 14, 2013, 11:37:23 PM
He's apparently been on board for a good while now. I'm reading that he started teasing it back in November.

Read that too.  That must mean they already have a good portion of the cast already set.

Not necessarily. Guardians of the Galaxy also has a 2014 release, and only has two actors so far, despite having a director confirmed for what, six months?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 15, 2013, 12:00:48 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 14, 2013, 11:57:34 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 14, 2013, 11:49:37 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Mar 14, 2013, 11:37:23 PM
He's apparently been on board for a good while now. I'm reading that he started teasing it back in November.

Read that too.  That must mean they already have a good portion of the cast already set.

Not necessarily. Guardians of the Galaxy also has a 2014 release, and only has two actors so far, despite having a director confirmed for what, six months?

Thing is, JPIV is a continuation in a franchise that used basically them same actors in each film.  GOTG is a completely new film.  We'll see though...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 15, 2013, 12:05:37 AM
Wasn't Sam Neill the only actor from either of the first two films in the third?

I wouldn't be surprised if this movie had an all new cast (though I'd love to see at least Grant and Malcolm return, story permitting).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Mar 15, 2013, 12:14:34 AM
I dont want any of the old characters

Can't wait for more info :)

I love how Colin Trevorrow says - For all of the fans, the mythology I will be tackling, I love it just as much as you do, I will respect it and hopefully make it not suck!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Mar 15, 2013, 12:27:52 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 15, 2013, 12:05:37 AM
Wasn't Sam Neill the only actor from either of the first two films in the third?

Laura Dern had an extended cameo.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 15, 2013, 12:51:54 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 14, 2013, 10:04:02 PM
Well, I guess I have to check out this guy's movie then.  He better do f**king great with this!  If they say he's a huge fanboy and his last film recieved good reviews, then lets f**king do this right, bruh!

Being a fanboy doesn't excite me in this case. Never forget that the Brothers Strause and P.W.S. Anderson were fanboys.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 15, 2013, 01:06:36 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 15, 2013, 12:51:54 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 14, 2013, 10:04:02 PM
Well, I guess I have to check out this guy's movie then.  He better do f**king great with this!  If they say he's a huge fanboy and his last film recieved good reviews, then lets f**king do this right, bruh!

Being a fanboy doesn't excite me in this case. Never forget that the Brothers Strause and P.W.S. Anderson were fanboys.

Well, many articles have been reporting that he'll be recieving tips and supervision from the vets of the franchise.  I don't think Spielberg would want his baby to go down the shitter, so he'll probably be very involved, since his robo flick is postponed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 15, 2013, 01:18:21 AM
Quote from: TJ Doc on Mar 15, 2013, 12:27:52 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 15, 2013, 12:05:37 AM
Wasn't Sam Neill the only actor from either of the first two films in the third?

Laura Dern had an extended cameo.

Ahh, forgot about that! Always did find it kind of annoying that they had her marry some other guy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 15, 2013, 01:21:46 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 15, 2013, 01:06:36 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 15, 2013, 12:51:54 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 14, 2013, 10:04:02 PM
Well, I guess I have to check out this guy's movie then.  He better do f**king great with this!  If they say he's a huge fanboy and his last film recieved good reviews, then lets f**king do this right, bruh!

Being a fanboy doesn't excite me in this case. Never forget that the Brothers Strause and P.W.S. Anderson were fanboys.

Well, many articles have been reporting that he'll be recieving tips and supervision from the vets of the franchise.  I don't think Spielberg would want his baby to go down the shitter, so he'll probably be very involved, since his robo flick is postponed.

I hope so.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 15, 2013, 03:12:14 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-1Uz5fFUyw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-1Uz5fFUyw#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Mar 15, 2013, 09:11:59 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 15, 2013, 01:06:36 AM
Well, many articles have been reporting that he'll be recieving tips and supervision from the vets of the franchise.  I don't think Spielberg would want his baby to go down the shitter, so he'll probably be very involved, since his robo flick is postponed.

The only supervision that would stop my concerns would be a haunting from Michael Crichton.


Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 15, 2013, 01:18:21 AM
Quote from: TJ Doc on Mar 15, 2013, 12:27:52 AM
Laura Dern had an extended cameo.

Ahh, forgot about that! Always did find it kind of annoying that they had her marry some other guy.

It's a nod to the book, she's engaged in JP and married by the time of TLW; they're just very close colleagues. Still, things are different in the first film, and I think there's an additional deleted scene somewhere which states they're a couple more solidly than Alan and Ian's tour car mumblings.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shinawi on Mar 15, 2013, 09:15:50 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 15, 2013, 01:18:21 AM
Quote from: TJ Doc on Mar 15, 2013, 12:27:52 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 15, 2013, 12:05:37 AM
Wasn't Sam Neill the only actor from either of the first two films in the third?

Laura Dern had an extended cameo.

Ahh, forgot about that! Always did find it kind of annoying that they had her marry some other guy.
That could be remedied by having Sam Neil pair with a tall blonde supermodel who can act smarter than Laura Dern. We'd forget about Laura Dern then.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 15, 2013, 02:51:57 PM
The worst part of these movies is how Alan Grant got friendzoned.

For shame. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Mar 15, 2013, 03:12:38 PM
I'm pretty sure none of the original cast members will come back. They might be referenced too, but it all depends on how the actors are feeling.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Mar 15, 2013, 04:47:42 PM
Moar Goldblum pls
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 15, 2013, 06:05:46 PM
Quote from: Shinawi on Mar 15, 2013, 09:15:50 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 15, 2013, 01:18:21 AM
Quote from: TJ Doc on Mar 15, 2013, 12:27:52 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 15, 2013, 12:05:37 AM
Wasn't Sam Neill the only actor from either of the first two films in the third?

Laura Dern had an extended cameo.

Ahh, forgot about that! Always did find it kind of annoying that they had her marry some other guy.
That could be remedied by having Sam Neil pair with a tall blonde supermodel who can act smarter than Laura Dern. We'd forget about Laura Dern then.

What was wrong with Laura?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 15, 2013, 06:07:22 PM
They totally should reveal in the fourth that the babies are in reality Alan's and then say that Ellie's husband is some evil corporate dipshit.

Fund it Universal.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 15, 2013, 06:09:05 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Mar 15, 2013, 06:07:22 PM
They totally should reveal in the fourth that the babies are in reality Alan's and then say that Ellie's husband is some evil corporate dipshit.

Fund it Universal.

BioSyn!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 15, 2013, 06:11:05 PM
Whoa, this is trippy. You both have CitW avvys and you posted right after one another o_O
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 15, 2013, 06:12:53 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 15, 2013, 06:09:05 PM
BioSyn!
Exactly!

Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 15, 2013, 06:11:05 PM
Whoa, this is trippy. You both have CitW avvys and you posted right after one another o_O
;) ;D ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Mar 15, 2013, 06:53:04 PM
Omega, Nightmare, who's making bets on that happening? ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 15, 2013, 07:14:15 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 15, 2013, 06:09:05 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Mar 15, 2013, 06:07:22 PM
They totally should reveal in the fourth that the babies are in reality Alan's and then say that Ellie's husband is some evil corporate dipshit.

Fund it Universal.

BioSyn!

Speaking of BioSyn, I'd like their story to be greatly expanded upon in JP IV. They had very little exposure in the first film yet in both novels, they had really good exposes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Mar 15, 2013, 07:25:27 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 15, 2013, 07:14:15 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 15, 2013, 06:09:05 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Mar 15, 2013, 06:07:22 PM
They totally should reveal in the fourth that the babies are in reality Alan's and then say that Ellie's husband is some evil corporate dipshit.

Fund it Universal.

BioSyn!

Speaking of BioSyn, I'd like their story to be greatly expanded upon in JP IV. They had very little exposure in the first film yet in both novels, they had really good exposes.

This right here!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 17, 2013, 06:46:35 AM
So I finally got a glimpse of the rest of the new JP toys courtesy of JPtoys.com forums...they're lousy JP 3 and JP 2009 repaints. So much for more new stuff.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Mar 17, 2013, 07:23:54 AM
Really new toys probably won't come out until JP4 release is near.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 17, 2013, 09:48:52 AM
Still cannot believe it is actually happening and it is not another hoax.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Mar 17, 2013, 10:00:25 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Mar 17, 2013, 09:48:52 AMStill cannot believe it is actually happening and it is not another hoax.

It's like the end of October all over again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 17, 2013, 01:42:43 PM
Yeah, this whole thing has come as quite the surprise.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 17, 2013, 01:59:42 PM
Is this the real life.. or is this just fantasy...

Spoiler
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJ9rUzIMcZQ
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Mar 17, 2013, 02:39:16 PM
Caught in a landslide, no escape from reality.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 17, 2013, 02:45:20 PM
Open your eyes

Look up to the sky and see

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F24.media.tumblr.com%2F5bb397e589aecd4c82ff6842efcbd140%2Ftumblr_mhovz0bxdL1r93xiko1_500.gif&hash=f979171b821aaf557b5dfaa47347f013a05a1e48)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 17, 2013, 04:16:38 PM
I'm just a t-rex...

I get no sympathy!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RazorSlash on Mar 17, 2013, 04:20:36 PM
Because I'm easy come, easy go

A little high, little low
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PVTDukeMorrison on Mar 17, 2013, 04:22:46 PM
Anyway the wind blows, doesn't really matter to me
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 17, 2013, 04:29:11 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_m2hfr6NS9U1qzf3pco1_500.gif&hash=4499ed6b264ba15e02343e9e43cf738b8f11cc1c)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 17, 2013, 05:33:58 PM
Hammond... Just cloned cloned a 'saur

From some blood found in amber, did some science now it roars
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 17, 2013, 09:31:50 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Mar 17, 2013, 07:23:54 AM
Really new toys probably won't come out until JP4 release is near.

Well the Allosaurus and Pachyrhinosaurus are technically new since the moulds were never used in the first place. I just hope these new ones, if they are new, are big rubber ones like the old days.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 19, 2013, 09:13:57 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FYD0yezG.jpg&hash=3313c6b74fbe4c9f3172ae8d80bce13d0ba6300f)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FUpwuXrt.jpg&hash=9be3ab359da7b7c6790b58af84757688d7616587)

hmm... :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 19, 2013, 11:19:28 AM
The Pacific Rim thread turned into 'Livin' on a Prayer' a couple days ago...now Jurassic Park is 'Bohemian Rhapsody'...this is quite awesome, if I do say so myself. :D

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 19, 2013, 11:34:09 AM
Phone me when a thread turns into Metallica.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Mar 19, 2013, 02:06:08 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 19, 2013, 11:19:28 AM
The Pacific Rim thread turned into 'Livin' on a Prayer' a couple days ago...now Jurassic Park is 'Bohemian Rhapsody'...this is quite awesome, if I do say so myself. :D

I do agree, my good man.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Mar 19, 2013, 06:05:41 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Exjj0W2zyrg#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Exjj0W2zyrg#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 19, 2013, 07:58:12 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 19, 2013, 09:13:57 AM
http://i.imgur.com/YD0yezG.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/UpwuXrt.jpg

hmm... :-\

I think they're pretty awesome looking, save for the Pachy's wacky paint job. I don't imagine they're rubber though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 20, 2013, 12:59:40 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Mar 19, 2013, 06:05:41 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Exjj0W2zyrg#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Exjj0W2zyrg#ws)

Hell yes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Mar 20, 2013, 01:04:12 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Mar 19, 2013, 06:05:41 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Exjj0W2zyrg#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Exjj0W2zyrg#ws)

WHOO!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 20, 2013, 01:09:28 AM
I'm now watching JP on Blu-ray ;D

SO PERFECT.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Mar 20, 2013, 01:19:32 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIoac7LuOak# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIoac7LuOak#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 20, 2013, 01:23:12 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Mar 20, 2013, 01:19:32 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIoac7LuOak# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIoac7LuOak#)

I'll be watching that in the morning.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 20, 2013, 01:50:28 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 20, 2013, 01:09:28 AM
I'm now watching JP on Blu-ray ;D

SO PERFECT.

Shit.  I still need to get that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 20, 2013, 02:51:18 AM
Mikey has been taken by the Essence of Goldblum.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi86.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk93%2FDoomRulz_316%2F733855_10151606412489175_1938990529_n_zps980fff9d.jpg&hash=a9b64bd91a09e9d65e30ea396dcf5e9c5523c6d4)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 20, 2013, 06:20:45 AM
So, when do you guys expect casting anouncements?  I mean, the very possibly true rumor of the film's shooting start date is right around the corner (April)  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Mar 20, 2013, 09:39:10 AM
Any moment now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 20, 2013, 11:04:04 AM
Timmy for the lead! Bring back Lewis Dodgson! Complete the circle.

Rumour has it Trevorrow has said no to feathered dinosaurs in JPIV.

Good man.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 20, 2013, 05:44:55 PM
Keeps it consistent with canon sure, but as a dino-nut, I'd be lying if I said it won't annoy me a little, lol.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Mar 20, 2013, 05:50:33 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 20, 2013, 11:04:04 AM
Timmy for the lead! Bring back Lewis Dodgson! Complete the circle.

Rumour has it Trevorrow has said no to feathered dinosaurs in JPIV.

Good man.

I'd be all for Joseph Mazzello (aka Timmy) being in the movie, he was in the Pacific, another Spielberg produced. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 20, 2013, 05:55:14 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 20, 2013, 05:44:55 PM
Keeps it consistent with canon sure, but as a dino-nut, I'd be lying if I said it won't annoy me a little, lol.

I think he just means he won't be sticking feathers all over the T-Rex. (for example) ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Mar 20, 2013, 06:25:56 PM
No feathers is perfectly fine by me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Mar 20, 2013, 06:33:41 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 20, 2013, 05:44:55 PM
Keeps it consistent with canon sure, but as a dino-nut, I'd be lying if I said it won't annoy me a little, lol.

In the case of Jurassic Park I'm definitely for sticking with canon over realism changes.

Just be grateful the first movie was done around the same time we found out T-rex didn't walk upright dragging it's tail. Now imagine that.

:laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 20, 2013, 06:34:20 PM
So the JP 3D app on Facebook sucked my night dry last night. Check these out.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi86.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk93%2FDoomRulz_316%2F303117_10100405085713501_2087511593_n_zpsa9398088.jpg&hash=c797f28583a4d36578ce15405f4d6920b9dcd257)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi86.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk93%2FDoomRulz_316%2F246497_10100405083487961_2095355345_n_zpsa7d88765.jpg&hash=f1950a49c275acc4867be282a214a44d922b0cbd)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi86.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk93%2FDoomRulz_316%2F6596_10100405078637681_1415278591_n_zps7610cf7f.jpg&hash=f857b1be9627824e24c1d1581f18ec446a14897f)

Quote from: Crazy Rich on Mar 20, 2013, 06:33:41 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 20, 2013, 05:44:55 PM
Keeps it consistent with canon sure, but as a dino-nut, I'd be lying if I said it won't annoy me a little, lol.

In the case of Jurassic Park I'm definitely for sticking with canon over realism changes.

Just be grateful the first movie was done around the same time we found out T-rex didn't walk upright dragging it's tail. Now imagine that.

:laugh:

Oh for sure. Haha, would be interesting no doubt.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 20, 2013, 06:38:29 PM
I'll take external continuity over scientific accuracy any day of the week.

And that's speaking as a dinosaur nut,
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Mar 20, 2013, 06:40:46 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 20, 2013, 06:34:20 PM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Mar 20, 2013, 06:33:41 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 20, 2013, 05:44:55 PM
Keeps it consistent with canon sure, but as a dino-nut, I'd be lying if I said it won't annoy me a little, lol.

In the case of Jurassic Park I'm definitely for sticking with canon over realism changes.

Just be grateful the first movie was done around the same time we found out T-rex didn't walk upright dragging it's tail. Now imagine that.

:laugh:

Oh for sure. Haha, would be interesting no doubt.

The jeep chase would end 10 times faster I think.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Mar 20, 2013, 08:43:30 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Mar 20, 2013, 06:38:29 PM
I'll take external continuity over scientific accuracy any day of the week.

And that's speaking as a dinosaur nut,

Same here.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 20, 2013, 09:25:32 PM
Hopefully they'll pluck them off the raptor's heads for the 4th then...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Mar 20, 2013, 09:27:37 PM
Small deleted scene from TLW has surfaced (it's 10 seconds ok but it explains why all of the sudden Malcolm knows about the 4 members going to the Island)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8nwga2ujq4#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8nwga2ujq4#ws)

Now if only I can find the extended trike scene from TLW where it runs across camp with the burning tarp on it's back...it was in a BBC documentary in 97
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 20, 2013, 09:45:25 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on Mar 20, 2013, 09:27:37 PM
Small deleted scene from TLW has surfaced (it's 10 seconds ok but it explains why all of the sudden Malcolm knows about the 4 members going to the Island)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8nwga2ujq4#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8nwga2ujq4#ws)

Now if only I can find the extended trike scene from TLW where it runs across camp with the burning tarp on it's back...it was in a BBC documentary in 97

Nice!  Blast from the past!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 20, 2013, 11:40:22 PM
Maybe these deleted scenes (including all the ones from JP1) were lost in the Universal backlot fires...

"The most damage was done on June 1, 2008 when a three alarm fire broke out on the backlot of Universal Studios. The fire started when a worker using an acetylene torch for welding accidentally let it set fire to the surroundings. The Los Angeles County Fire Department had reported that Brownstone Street, New York Street, New England Street, the King Kong attraction, some structures that make up Courthouse Square, and the Video Vault had burned down (not to be confused with the actual Film Vault, The Video Vault contains the duplicates of the films). Aerial news footage showed the miraculous survival of the Courthouse building survived the fire (for a third time) with only the west side of it being slightly charred. Over 516 firefighters from various local fire departments, as well as two helicopters dropping water, had responded to the fire. Fourteen firefighters and three Los Angeles County sheriffs' deputies sustained minor injuries. The fire was finally put out after 12 hours, since firefighters encountered low water pressure."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 21, 2013, 02:45:39 AM
Awesome to see a deleted scene never before seen! (At least I haven't)



As I did wit hthe Godzilla thread, I found some nice JP images while web surfing...

Spoiler
3rd movie.  RIGHT NOW...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.forevergeek.com%2Fwp-content%2Fmedia%2F2011%2F10%2Fjurassicpark-930x581.jpg&hash=9e213f1741a469421a330cf34ce87bec3c2b1b3e)

Love the CGI at this part...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F24.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_m9iohzGN7X1qmvzv2o1_500.gif&hash=66e1dcf62217105cc9afc5831eda608b155ad34e)

Original Go-Motion JP T-Rex puppet (deteriorating)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm2.static.flickr.com%2F1083%2F1056998107_a4295852d6.jpg&hash=51e61b9ed619b2973dcb4a976361afba297d7aeb)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.deviantart.com%2Fdownload%2F325383176%2Fjurassic_park_art_2_by_chicagocubsfan24-d5dq39k.jpg&hash=a8fadaba4b7c089f1db73c1b79230b1b3af808d6)

Take a good look...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.filmofilia.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F11%2FJurassic-Park-3D_07.jpg&hash=4d6a537b584b6de3d6b1271144e3b194929ddfb0)

Ultimate wallpaper...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcollider.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fjurassic-park-3d.jpg&hash=2b686c1fadf5330349ae7027d12e322adcf35e70)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.fineartamerica.com%2Fimages-medium-large%2Freality-fiction-david-pry.jpg&hash=f637f0bde0ae04e223d67b2bd5f2917e8e458d3e)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Mar 21, 2013, 03:51:08 AM
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=76091 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=76091)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 21, 2013, 04:04:39 AM
Awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 21, 2013, 05:55:03 AM
I never noticed how enormous the Rex's feet were until you posted that picture of it breaking out. Sheesh. Explains why the Bull Rex toy had Sasquatch-sized feet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 21, 2013, 05:57:03 AM
Tell me about it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 21, 2013, 06:04:04 AM
I do love JP and all but now more than ever, I'm really noticing just how inaccurate their dino designs are. Yes yes, I know it's a movie but it's annoying me quite a bit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Mar 21, 2013, 06:13:13 AM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Mar 21, 2013, 03:51:08 AM
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=76091 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=76091)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1015.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Faf277%2Facm403%2FPraiseTheLord.gif&hash=cdf59de188a44429a2ce346645e6856b9aa55564)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ShadowPred on Mar 21, 2013, 06:15:47 AM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Mar 21, 2013, 03:51:08 AM
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=76091 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=76091)

Good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 21, 2013, 08:51:16 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 21, 2013, 06:04:04 AM
I do love JP and all but now more than ever, I'm really noticing just how inaccurate their dino designs are. Yes yes, I know it's a movie but it's annoying me quite a bit.

Don't let it get to you man. :-[
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 21, 2013, 09:03:08 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 21, 2013, 06:04:04 AM
I do love JP and all but now more than ever, I'm really noticing just how inaccurate their dino designs are. Yes yes, I know it's a movie but it's annoying me quite a bit.
Think of them as mutants, much like the novel ones are.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 21, 2013, 09:05:57 AM
Left side of my brain doesn't see that, LOL.

Anyway, in regards to the fourth film, forget cast and director for a second. I want to hear news of who's designing the dinos and which ones we'll get.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 21, 2013, 10:00:38 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 21, 2013, 09:05:57 AM
Left side of my brain doesn't see that, LOL.
It will learn to.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 21, 2013, 11:14:14 AM
Yeah, I personally never had a problem thinking of them as mutants, given the method through which they were created.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Mar 21, 2013, 12:02:30 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 21, 2013, 11:14:14 AM
Yeah, I personally never had a problem thinking of them as mutants, given the method through which they were created.

Kind of defeats the point, as the whole raison d'etre of Jurassic Park is that it's the first film ever to present dinosaurs as real and believable animals, rather than monsters.

I think we discussed the feather issue a few dozen pages back, but none of the existing JP dinosaurs actually must have feathers to be scientifically accurate. Skin impressions of Tyrannosaurus and Compsognathus are featherless (and the latter was found in deposits which preserved feathers spectacularly in Archaeopteryx), and Dilophosaurus, Gallimimus and Utahraptor/Achillobator may have been large enough not to require insulation (and the former may be from the wrong evolutionary line in any case). No sauropod or ornithischian is confirmed to have feathers (though some ceratopsians seem to have had a strange set of long bristles covering their tails).

Personally though, if they introduce any new species in the next film which are the right size and from the right group to have feathers, I'd prefer they be feathered. JP should be about portraying dinosaurs, if you want to see mutants then watch Prometheus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 21, 2013, 12:55:53 PM
You also have to take into account the hand position in the theropods. Completely agreed otherwise -- though I have never seen the actual report of the Tyrannosaurus skin impressions! It is a very interesting subject and I would like to read on it.

Regarding the dinosaur portrayal thing, well, I think I was one of the guys discussing it aeons ago -- but there are some pretty speculative things. The Dilophosaurus frill being one.

And I'll take any 80s trash movie about mutants over Prometheus any day of the week. Blah!


By the way, the paleontological injections in this thread with you are always fun.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Mar 21, 2013, 01:53:10 PM
Requiem, where'd you get that awesome JP4 logo?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Mar 21, 2013, 03:06:11 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Mar 21, 2013, 12:55:53 PM
You also have to take into account the hand position in the theropods. Completely agreed otherwise -- though I have never seen the actual report of the Tyrannosaurus skin impressions! It is a very interesting subject and I would like to read on it.


By the way, the paleontological injections in this thread with you are always fun.

Yup, good point on the hand positions, though they may have kept that physiology even if it no longer became necessary for anchoring feathers. Another point about the larger coelurosaurs is that they may have been too heavy to sit on top of their eggs, so as well as not requiring feathers for insulation, they also wouldn't need the long arm feathers for covering a nest during incubation. There's a bit of research to suggest the arm feathers may have helped keep them steady when standing on struggling prey, but that is somewhat tenuous right now.

I think I read about Tyrannosaurus skin impressions in Gregory Paul's book, but there's a reference (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyrannosaurus#Skin_and_feathers) on Wikipedia: 'skin impressions from a Tyrannosaurus rex specimen nicknamed "Wyrex" (BHI 6230) discovered in Montana in 2002, as well as other large tyrannosaurid specimens, show mosaic scales.'
There's always the possibility that other, unpreserved parts of the body may have been feathered, but for an animal of Tyrannosaurus' size (and the climate it inhabited) I think they'd strictly be for display.

And loving the discussions here, too. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 21, 2013, 03:17:15 PM
Very very interesting. Completely agree there on the points you make.

Gregory Paul rocks. So totally have to get his book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 21, 2013, 03:20:59 PM
In light of JPIV I made a video called 'The 10 Rules of Jurassic Park' I hope ya'll like it...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gjnMnytNiw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gjnMnytNiw#ws)

(some audio skips because my editing software was being stupid.)


Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Mar 21, 2013, 03:36:28 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Mar 21, 2013, 03:17:15 PM
Gregory Paul rocks. So totally have to get his book.

I think you'd love it, I'm just finishing it at the moment. Goes into a vast amount of detail, and provides opposing arguments for most issues (though it's always very clear which side he comes down on), and doesn't tend to jump to ridiculous assumptions. It's very much written for adults coming into it from a knowledgable perspective, and heavy on academic terminology, but unlike The Dinosauria it's digestible by mere mortals.

Most of the book comprises a list of every known dinosaur species, each one with information on how much fossil evidence there is, where's it's from, when (precisely), estimated weight and dimensions, what its habitat was like, and most of the well-known examples have skeletal depictions so it's very easy to see the exact differentiation between species.

Does get a bit dispiriting though when you come to Troodon, for example, and find it's labelled as Saurornithoides. Paul does love his controversial taxonomy. The one flaw I'd point out with the book is that most of the miscellaneous species notes are concerned with taxonomy rather than information on the actual animal.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 21, 2013, 04:18:30 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Mar 21, 2013, 01:53:10 PM
Requiem, where'd you get that awesome JP4 logo?

Internet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Mar 21, 2013, 05:44:42 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 21, 2013, 04:18:30 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Mar 21, 2013, 01:53:10 PM
Requiem, where'd you get that awesome JP4 logo?

Internet.

Do you have a larger image?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 21, 2013, 06:20:57 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Mar 21, 2013, 12:02:30 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 21, 2013, 11:14:14 AM
Yeah, I personally never had a problem thinking of them as mutants, given the method through which they were created.

Kind of defeats the point, as the whole raison d'etre of Jurassic Park is that it's the first film ever to present dinosaurs as real and believable animals, rather than monsters.

I think we discussed the feather issue a few dozen pages back, but none of the existing JP dinosaurs actually must have feathers to be scientifically accurate. Skin impressions of Tyrannosaurus and Compsognathus are featherless (and the latter was found in deposits which preserved feathers spectacularly in Archaeopteryx), and Dilophosaurus, Gallimimus and Utahraptor/Achillobator may have been large enough not to require insulation (and the former may be from the wrong evolutionary line in any case). No sauropod or ornithischian is confirmed to have feathers (though some ceratopsians seem to have had a strange set of long bristles covering their tails).

Personally though, if they introduce any new species in the next film which are the right size and from the right group to have feathers, I'd prefer they be feathered. JP should be about portraying dinosaurs, if you want to see mutants then watch Prometheus.

Baby theropods are said to have had downy feathers covering their body to maintain body heat at a young age. Larger theropods like T.Rex probably didn't have feathers but I don't know of any study that said otherwise. I think right now at least, the consensus is that the only theropods that for sure had feathers in their entire life time were dromaeosaurids.

As for ceratopsians, this will blow you away if you didn't already know it.  Check out #1 on the list. (http://listverse.com/2011/02/22/top-10-dinosaurs-that-arent-what-they-were/) Yeah.

Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 21, 2013, 03:20:59 PM
In light of JPIV I made a video called 'The 10 Rules of Jurassic Park' I hope ya'll like it...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gjnMnytNiw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gjnMnytNiw#ws)

(some audio skips because my editing software was being stupid.)


Great video dude!!! But you forgot rule #0: DON'T KILL THE T.REX

Also, on a side note, 3:52 made me laugh; the look on the Bull's face :D :D :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 21, 2013, 06:31:06 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Mar 21, 2013, 05:44:42 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 21, 2013, 04:18:30 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Mar 21, 2013, 01:53:10 PM
Requiem, where'd you get that awesome JP4 logo?

Internet.

Do you have a larger image?

I just took it from this and played around with Paint after words...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc04.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2Ff%2F2010%2F231%2F3%2F1%2FJurassic_Park_IV_poster_by_RafaelAveiro.jpg&hash=92d3bb7c4c9fd2a6e130df9b3c2cef83cc23b322)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 21, 2013, 06:36:39 PM
Not to risk sounding stupid, but that's just fan created, right? There's no official promo material yet?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 21, 2013, 06:39:37 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 21, 2013, 06:20:57 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 21, 2013, 03:20:59 PM
In light of JPIV I made a video called 'The 10 Rules of Jurassic Park' I hope ya'll like it...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gjnMnytNiw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gjnMnytNiw#ws)

(some audio skips because my editing software was being stupid.)


Great video dude!!! But you forgot rule #0: DON'T KILL THE T.REX

Also, on a side note, 3:52 made me laugh; the look on the Bull's face :D :D :D

Thanks man!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 21, 2013, 06:41:11 PM
You have an awesome voice.


Aaaaand Godzilla in the background.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 21, 2013, 06:41:52 PM
Ooooo yeah!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Mar 21, 2013, 07:13:21 PM
That figure of Godzilla in the background...


Where do I get one of those...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 21, 2013, 08:06:11 PM
It's a puppet not a figure ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Mar 21, 2013, 08:09:41 PM
Does not change the amount of want.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 21, 2013, 08:14:44 PM
It's the 1998 one, to boot.


C-c-c-combo breaker.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 21, 2013, 08:36:37 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 21, 2013, 06:36:39 PM
Not to risk sounding stupid, but that's just fan created, right? There's no official promo material yet?

Fan made.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Mar 21, 2013, 08:56:25 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 21, 2013, 06:31:06 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Mar 21, 2013, 05:44:42 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 21, 2013, 04:18:30 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Mar 21, 2013, 01:53:10 PM
Requiem, where'd you get that awesome JP4 logo?

Internet.

Do you have a larger image?

I just took it from this and played around with Paint after words...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc04.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2Ff%2F2010%2F231%2F3%2F1%2FJurassic_Park_IV_poster_by_RafaelAveiro.jpg&hash=92d3bb7c4c9fd2a6e130df9b3c2cef83cc23b322)
Awesome! Thanks man!

Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 21, 2013, 08:36:37 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 21, 2013, 06:36:39 PM
Not to risk sounding stupid, but that's just fan created, right? There's no official promo material yet?

Fan made.
And yet it will probably look a lot better than the actual marketing material soon to be released.  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Mar 22, 2013, 12:47:24 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 21, 2013, 06:20:57 PMBaby theropods are said to have had downy feathers covering their body to maintain body heat at a young age. Larger theropods like T.Rex probably didn't have feathers but I don't know of any study that said otherwise. I think right now at least, the consensus is that the only theropods that for sure had feathers in their entire life time were dromaeosaurids.

As for ceratopsians, this will blow you away if you didn't already know it. Check out #1 on the list. (http://listverse.com/2011/02/22/top-10-dinosaurs-that-arent-what-they-were/) Yeah.

That's actually a really good article. Nothing on there I'd argue with or get pedantic about (which may be a first), and has several things I didn't know, too. Cheers!

Dromaeosaurids, like Tyrannosaurids, are assumed to be feathered as long as they're not so large as to overheat from it, which as I've said earlier may have been a concern with the largest deinonychosaurids (meaning a JP-sized animal may indeed have been bald). Climate's also an issue though - in modern animals there's great disparity in the insulation between mammoths and elephants, and bengal and siberian tigers, and this was also the case with Yutyrannus, a fluffy mid-size tyrannosaurid which apparently inhabited a cooler region. Rexy, as I said earlier, had unadorned scaly skin in the impressions we've discovered, but I'd assume infants for all these genera would be insulated as they wouldn't have the bulk required to internally retain heat. Otherwise they'd need round-the-clock care (as in penguins) or live in an extremely hot, stable climate.

Actually, now I come to think of it, that does render one JP animal almost certainly inaccurate in terms of feathers - the baby rex. Personally I think Gallimimus would have been partially feathered, but it's large enough to be debatable.
Compsognathus' scaly skin actually surprised me, as I'd assume every coelurosaur group to have some form of feathery insulation if size and climate permitted, but according to Wikipedia there's a possibility it may have had an uneven distribution of protofeathers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Mar 22, 2013, 01:30:51 AM
The baby rex had feathers in the book, IIRC.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 22, 2013, 02:50:17 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Mar 22, 2013, 12:47:24 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 21, 2013, 06:20:57 PMBaby theropods are said to have had downy feathers covering their body to maintain body heat at a young age. Larger theropods like T.Rex probably didn't have feathers but I don't know of any study that said otherwise. I think right now at least, the consensus is that the only theropods that for sure had feathers in their entire life time were dromaeosaurids.

As for ceratopsians, this will blow you away if you didn't already know it. Check out #1 on the list. (http://listverse.com/2011/02/22/top-10-dinosaurs-that-arent-what-they-were/) Yeah.

That's actually a really good article. Nothing on there I'd argue with or get pedantic about (which may be a first), and has several things I didn't know, too. Cheers!

Dromaeosaurids, like Tyrannosaurids, are assumed to be feathered as long as they're not so large as to overheat from it, which as I've said earlier may have been a concern with the largest deinonychosaurids (meaning a JP-sized animal may indeed have been bald). Climate's also an issue though - in modern animals there's great disparity in the insulation between mammoths and elephants, and bengal and siberian tigers, and this was also the case with Yutyrannus, a fluffy mid-size tyrannosaurid which apparently inhabited a cooler region. Rexy, as I said earlier, had unadorned scaly skin in the impressions we've discovered, but I'd assume infants for all these genera would be insulated as they wouldn't have the bulk required to internally retain heat. Otherwise they'd need round-the-clock care (as in penguins) or live in an extremely hot, stable climate.

Actually, now I come to think of it, that does render one JP animal almost certainly inaccurate in terms of feathers - the baby rex. Personally I think Gallimimus would have been partially feathered, but it's large enough to be debatable.
Compsognathus' scaly skin actually surprised me, as I'd assume every coelurosaur group to have some form of feathery insulation if size and climate permitted, but according to Wikipedia there's a possibility it may have had an uneven distribution of protofeathers.

If coelurosaurids were in fact feathered, I am absolutely positive tyrannosaurids were given the familial relations.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Mar 22, 2013, 09:07:51 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 22, 2013, 02:50:17 AMIf coelurosaurids were in fact feathered, I am absolutely positive tyrannosaurids were given the familial relations.

Yes, that's what I'm saying.  :D

Kiramid, I'm talking about the film. It's in reference to the director's tweet that there won't be feathers in JP4.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 22, 2013, 09:27:27 AM
All the TV spots are getting me so pumped for JP3D!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Mar 22, 2013, 12:00:30 PM
They better not go changing around any sound or visual effects for the re-release, like how they changed Anakin's force spirit image or whatever at the end of episode 6 from what he would look like as Anakin at the time of his death to the image of Anakin right before he turned into Darth Vader, or how they changed the gun sound effects in The Terminator when they "digitally remastered" it.

As for JP4, I would love to see it back on the original island as Alien3 recommends in his video, they return to find it completely overrun with dinosaurs, familiar buildings, fences and landmarks badly weathered etc... But I'd like to see a scene where there's an underwater exhibit that's been completely exposed to the elements, run down and flooded. In the underwater exhibit and the surrounding water (perhaps it's in a massive artificial lake?) are these things:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.0nd.org%2F_pics%2Fprojects%2Fliopleurodon%2Ffinal.jpg&hash=47c407930532aeb09222b1c26fb9f47fa5c44d1a)

When I was a kid I used to have recurring dreams about sea monsters. To this day the moments in video games and movies that get me the most amped up are moments involving sea monsters. I love watching movies like Jaws etc, they freak me out the most ;D I'd love to see an underwater scene in a Jurassic Park movie.

About the creatures themselves, we don't even know that much about them do we? What if they were ambush type hunters like crocodiles that live on the sea floor and wait for unsuspecting prey to swim over the top of them...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naissus on Mar 22, 2013, 12:29:39 PM
As far as making JPIV on Isla Nubar, in the movieverse did the Costa Rican military destroy it?  I know in the books it was destroyed.  If that is the case it is quite easy to retcon it with a simple cover up. 

Also, as far as feather are concerned.  Perhaps dinosaurs had feathers during a season of cooling and shed them during the warmer seasons.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 22, 2013, 12:43:33 PM
The main reason for me why feathers shouldn't be overused in JPIV is, because as scientifically accurate they are, they just don't seem as threatening as something with scales.

"That doesn't look very scary, more like a...six foot turkey."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 22, 2013, 01:42:19 PM
Just chalk lack of feathers up to the frog DNA or something.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 22, 2013, 01:47:34 PM
Man I love this teaser trailer for The Lost World. Maybe a trailer like this will come out around summer time for JPIV.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WQsE6yov268 (http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WQsE6yov268)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm4.staticflickr.com%2F3104%2F2585180158_67af2c157e.jpg&hash=de1c4c9a846adf1028e87e577698df9fd16f98de)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm4.staticflickr.com%2F3042%2F2584349969_0e29b501f7.jpg&hash=3195deb97007f339f5dfece5e2d576072f5ed2eb)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm3.staticflickr.com%2F2124%2F2584349947_f515c2b0e9.jpg&hash=dd3df3583f471fa1ffd3f3a798e16622dc24c3d5)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Mar 22, 2013, 05:02:58 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 22, 2013, 01:47:34 PM
Man I love this teaser trailer for The Lost World. Maybe a trailer like this will come out around summer time for JPIV.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WQsE6yov268 (http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WQsE6yov268)

http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3104/2585180158_67af2c157e.jpg

http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3042/2584349969_0e29b501f7.jpg

http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2124/2584349947_f515c2b0e9.jpg

Outstanding f**king teaser!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The One and Only on Mar 22, 2013, 05:38:41 PM
Supposedly, according to the rumor mill, marine dinosaurs will be putting in an appearance in the fourth entry.
http://movies.yahoo.com/blogs/movie-talk/5-baddest-dinos-jurassic-park-5-jurassic-park-232525953.html?page=2 (http://movies.yahoo.com/blogs/movie-talk/5-baddest-dinos-jurassic-park-5-jurassic-park-232525953.html?page=2)
I'm hoping to see a plesiosaur give our stars a bit of trouble like the ones in DinoCrisis 2.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cheatsunlimited.com%2Fimg%2Fgames%2FDino%2520Crisis%25202_01.gif&hash=fdc3c72adc2f62caa2b96e43d5b5aae15936fe95)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 22, 2013, 05:40:35 PM
They're just saying "it's about time for marine reptiles to make an appearance" it's not official.

Yet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Mar 22, 2013, 08:13:32 PM
Quote from: The One and Only on Mar 22, 2013, 05:38:41 PM
Supposedly, according to the rumor mill, marine dinosaurs will be putting in an appearance in the fourth entry.
http://movies.yahoo.com/blogs/movie-talk/5-baddest-dinos-jurassic-park-5-jurassic-park-232525953.html?page=2 (http://movies.yahoo.com/blogs/movie-talk/5-baddest-dinos-jurassic-park-5-jurassic-park-232525953.html?page=2)
I'm hoping to see a plesiosaur give our stars a bit of trouble like the ones in DinoCrisis 2.
http://www.cheatsunlimited.com/img/games/Dino%20Crisis%202_01.gif

2 out of the 5 pictures are accurate, btw.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 23, 2013, 02:59:41 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Mar 22, 2013, 01:30:51 AM
The baby rex had feathers in the book, IIRC.
They did.

You can get around that by saying the one in the film had already shed them out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 23, 2013, 03:12:18 PM
Had a nightmare about a sea dwelling, 6 legged large carnivorous lizard with a T-Rex head... :P Red with black stripes like the old Rex JP toy. They were fond of pack hunting.  :P

God damn, can i run fast in my sleep.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 25, 2013, 03:33:39 AM
Quote from: The One and Only on Mar 22, 2013, 05:38:41 PM
Supposedly, according to the rumor mill, marine dinosaurs will be putting in an appearance in the fourth entry.
http://movies.yahoo.com/blogs/movie-talk/5-baddest-dinos-jurassic-park-5-jurassic-park-232525953.html?page=2 (http://movies.yahoo.com/blogs/movie-talk/5-baddest-dinos-jurassic-park-5-jurassic-park-232525953.html?page=2)
I'm hoping to see a plesiosaur give our stars a bit of trouble like the ones in DinoCrisis 2.
http://www.cheatsunlimited.com/img/games/Dino%20Crisis%202_01.gif

There are no such thing as marine dinosaurs!!!! >_<

Also, I'm not sure their making an appearance would be a good thing. The thing is that JP was never about the dinosaurs themselves. It's always been about the humans and their desire to control something they don't fully understand. The dinosaurs were limited in their variety for the sole purpose of developing the human angle in the movie and not overwhelming the audience with different dinos all at once. Throwing in marine reptiles I think would be overkill.

As for feathered dinos in JP...I think that "six-foot turkey" wouldn't look so goofy once it jumps on someone and rips him to pieces.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Mar 25, 2013, 03:42:35 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 25, 2013, 03:33:39 AMThe dinosaurs were limited in their variety for the sole purpose of developing the human angle in the movie and not overwhelming the audience with different dinos all at once. Throwing in marine reptiles I think would be overkill.

Well now that we've had 3 movies to get introduced to all the well known dino's surely it's time we had some prehistoric fishies?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 25, 2013, 03:46:18 AM
I guess one wouldn't be so bad but do you really want to spend dwindling on where it came from, why inGen never revealed it before, etc...?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 25, 2013, 03:55:10 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 25, 2013, 03:46:18 AM
I guess one wouldn't be so bad but do you really want to spend dwindling on where it came from, why inGen never revealed it before, etc...?

Life finds a way...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 25, 2013, 05:30:03 AM
Quote"@deansherriff: Starting concept work on #jurassicpark tomorrow .. Should be fun :)"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 25, 2013, 07:23:31 AM
Needs more Crash McCreery.

NEEDS.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Mar 25, 2013, 09:47:48 AM
Man, feathered dinosaurs are pussies.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 25, 2013, 12:22:43 PM
And so is Pluto not being a planet.

Screw science.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 25, 2013, 01:41:58 PM
Jurassic Park dinosaurs are genetically engineered fictional animals based loosely on real dinosaurs. That has always been the case. Feathers should only appear on dinosaurs we haven't already seen.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Mar 25, 2013, 06:37:37 PM
They had feathered raptors in JP3.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 25, 2013, 06:38:56 PM
'Feathered' is a big word for those little crests on the males' heads.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Mar 25, 2013, 07:21:01 PM
I'm probably alone in this, but I hope the JPIII Raptor designs still appear in IV.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Mar 25, 2013, 07:22:37 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Mar 25, 2013, 09:47:48 AM
Man, feathered dinosaurs are pussies.

I sense some "Robbaz" in those words.  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 25, 2013, 07:23:17 PM
The director tweeted "No feathers" recently.

No JP3 Raptor designs, then.

https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/314384734190985217
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 25, 2013, 07:24:26 PM
I would love it if the designs from all three films appeared together. I'm in particular affectioned to the more brightly colored TLW males.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages3.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20121120185855%2Fdinosaurs%2Fimages%2F6%2F62%2FMale_raptor.jpg&hash=5a0969184f9de7452c17b736cfd48a4e490a8d8e)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 25, 2013, 07:25:36 PM
The white "female" in JP3 is my favourite :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Mar 25, 2013, 07:39:45 PM
2 New Concept Artists hired and starts tomorrow

Dean Sherriff (MI4, After Earth, Watchmen and 300: Rise of an Empire)

http://www.deansherriff.com/dean/Home.html (http://www.deansherriff.com/dean/Home.html)

Seth Engstrom (Avatar, John Carter, and World War Z)

http://sethengstrom.blogspot.ca/ (http://sethengstrom.blogspot.ca/)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 25, 2013, 07:42:38 PM
Both are environment and artificial object designers. Interesting.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 25, 2013, 07:45:48 PM
Old Ingen facilities... or new stuff.

Byosin or Grendel Corporation, anyone? :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Mar 25, 2013, 08:28:19 PM
I hope it's going to be a new park
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 25, 2013, 08:37:18 PM
BioSyn creates Cretaceous Resort. Fund it!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 25, 2013, 10:42:56 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Mar 25, 2013, 07:24:26 PM
I would love it if the designs from all three films appeared together. I'm in particular affectioned to the more brightly colored TLW males.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages3.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20121120185855%2Fdinosaurs%2Fimages%2F6%2F62%2FMale_raptor.jpg&hash=5a0969184f9de7452c17b736cfd48a4e490a8d8e)

In Jurassic Time (narrated by Richard Attenborough) Hammond talks about three tribes of Raptors. Maybe we've seen two so far, one in JP and TLW and another in JP3. Hammond also explains the third tribe staked its territory in the mountains, maybe they could have feathers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Mar 25, 2013, 10:44:37 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 25, 2013, 10:42:56 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Mar 25, 2013, 07:24:26 PM
I would love it if the designs from all three films appeared together. I'm in particular affectioned to the more brightly colored TLW males.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages3.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20121120185855%2Fdinosaurs%2Fimages%2F6%2F62%2FMale_raptor.jpg&hash=5a0969184f9de7452c17b736cfd48a4e490a8d8e)

In Jurassic Time (narrated by Richard Attenborough) Hammond talks about three tribes of Raptors. Maybe we've seen two so far, one in JP and TLW and another in JP3. Hammond also explains the third tribe staked its territory in the mountains, maybe they could have feathers.

I somewhat doubt the third tribe would have feathers.

I mean, OTHER than the fact that JP4 was confirmed for no feathers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Mar 25, 2013, 10:45:19 PM
I wonder if the Thirteenth Tribe had feathers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 25, 2013, 10:47:15 PM
So say we all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Mar 25, 2013, 10:47:56 PM
So say we all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 25, 2013, 10:48:46 PM
SO SAY WE ALL.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 25, 2013, 10:53:55 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fv107%2FSJwashere%2Feddie.jpg&hash=adc56db4a417602f6c4435f722f0ea88c9322b1e)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 26, 2013, 01:08:01 AM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Mar 25, 2013, 10:44:37 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 25, 2013, 10:42:56 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Mar 25, 2013, 07:24:26 PM
I would love it if the designs from all three films appeared together. I'm in particular affectioned to the more brightly colored TLW males.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages3.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20121120185855%2Fdinosaurs%2Fimages%2F6%2F62%2FMale_raptor.jpg&hash=5a0969184f9de7452c17b736cfd48a4e490a8d8e)

In Jurassic Time (narrated by Richard Attenborough) Hammond talks about three tribes of Raptors. Maybe we've seen two so far, one in JP and TLW and another in JP3. Hammond also explains the third tribe staked its territory in the mountains, maybe they could have feathers.

I somewhat doubt the third tribe would have feathers.

I mean, OTHER than the fact that JP4 was confirmed for no feathers.

Yeah I know, I was pointing out (to all those feather lovers out there) a third tribe of raptors that could have feathers. If we don't see them in JP4...meh. I don't particularly want feathers on the dinosaurs we've already seen.

;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 26, 2013, 01:15:50 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Mar 25, 2013, 07:25:36 PM
The white "female" in JP3 is my favourite :)

Cause she's the only normal looking one.

Isn't it funny how the TLW raptors are the only ones that had the vertical slit eyes?  If you think about it, all three tribes have already been revealed.  I personally would love to see the first JP raptors return in the 4th.  Those are TERRIFYING.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 26, 2013, 01:17:03 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 26, 2013, 01:15:50 AM
Those are TERRIFYING.

The kitchen scene :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Mar 26, 2013, 01:24:34 AM
The TLW raptors weren't bad at all, but they had a certain feeling of... scripteness to them? Like, when they appeared, it felt like a time that they would and should. Jurassic Park's were just terrifying, full of animalistic unpredictability. They always showed up at the worst time and you never saw it coming; they made the jungle and by extension, the facilities, feel like the Nostromo -- where every turn was a dark one and you always had a sense of being hunted.

One of my favorite moments is one you don't even see, just Muldoon telling Ellie (and the audience) what he sees... and we know to trust him because he's a seasoned hunter and tracker. So what does that mean when he's bested by the creatures? Nothing good is to come.

Jurassic Park 3's raptors? Abomination-tier. Passive, felt highly scripted, and existed only to feed a shitty side-plot. Let's hope Jurassic Park IV does them justice.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 26, 2013, 02:39:08 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 25, 2013, 01:41:58 PM
Jurassic Park dinosaurs are genetically engineered fictional animals based loosely on real dinosaurs. That has always been the case. Feathers should only appear on dinosaurs we haven't already seen.

No thanks. If they decide to introduce a feathered Apatosaurus, I'm outta here.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 26, 2013, 08:18:28 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 26, 2013, 02:39:08 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 25, 2013, 01:41:58 PM
Jurassic Park dinosaurs are genetically engineered fictional animals based loosely on real dinosaurs. That has always been the case. Feathers should only appear on dinosaurs we haven't already seen.

No thanks. If they decide to introduce a feathered Apatosaurus, I'm outta here.

Don't worry they won't. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 26, 2013, 01:27:21 PM
More Ceratosaurus and Carnotaurus. Cannot go wrong with feathers or not, cos they were most definitely scaly beasts.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Mar 26, 2013, 02:26:12 PM
Evolution of the Raptor:

Jurassic Park
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.wikia.com%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2F1%2F14%2FJurassic-park-raptor.jpg&hash=6b9cfab2412a6ed2a826363646a6c203428d3bb9)

The Lost World: Jurassic Park
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.home.lv%2Fdinoworld%2Flw27.jpg&hash=61fa89d8e7d4d4d52c21aa88eda58b4d600daff4)

Jurassic Park III
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F_fQFNvUYgJGU%2FTJvSA4YU35I%2FAAAAAAAAABY%2FGCkqtjahmu8%2Fs1600%2Fraptor.jpg&hash=09e7fcb1dd66ac4a4f7a938c061b2acf12210074)

To me, the scariest one has to be TLW Raptor. I love the tiger stripes and those menacing eyes. The Jurassic Park Raptor is the most natural looking one while the JP3 Raptor is the silliest looking one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 26, 2013, 02:58:01 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Mar 26, 2013, 02:26:12 PM
Evolution of the Raptor:

Jurassic Park
http://images.wikia.com/jurassicpark/images/1/14/Jurassic-park-raptor.jpg

The Lost World: Jurassic Park
http://www.home.lv/dinoworld/lw27.jpg

Jurassic Park III
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F_fQFNvUYgJGU%2FTJvSA4YU35I%2FAAAAAAAAABY%2FGCkqtjahmu8%2Fs1600%2Fraptor.jpg&hash=09e7fcb1dd66ac4a4f7a938c061b2acf12210074)

To me, the scariest one has to be TLW Raptor. I love the tiger stripes and those menacing eyes. The Jurassic Park Raptor is the most natural looking one while the JP3 Raptor is the silliest looking one.

You're right.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 26, 2013, 03:06:26 PM
No dinosaur in JP is natural. Especially the Raptors. ;)

I think the eyes of the JP3 raptor prove its a different breed seen in the first two movies.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 26, 2013, 04:32:58 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Mar 26, 2013, 02:26:12 PM
http://www.home.lv/dinoworld/lw27.jpg
I love this photo.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 26, 2013, 04:53:35 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Mar 26, 2013, 01:27:21 PM
More Ceratosaurus and Carnotaurus. Cannot go wrong with feathers or not, cos they were most definitely scaly beasts.

Ceratosaurus never struck me as being scary. I only liked seeing it because it's never received the movie treatment, ever.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 26, 2013, 04:59:22 PM
The only cameo it had in the third film didn't help, either. Bah!

It can be used well under the right circumstances, though. It's not in the size range of a Tyrannosaurus, nor in that of a Raptor -- would be pretty interesting to see.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Mar 26, 2013, 06:44:32 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 26, 2013, 04:53:35 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Mar 26, 2013, 01:27:21 PM
More Ceratosaurus and Carnotaurus. Cannot go wrong with feathers or not, cos they were most definitely scaly beasts.

Ceratosaurus never struck me as being scary. I only liked seeing it because it's never received the movie treatment, ever.
IN the JPOG game, they are cannibalistic. I had three of them f**king kill and eat my Allosaurus o_o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Mar 26, 2013, 06:46:34 PM
Quote from: Gate on Mar 26, 2013, 06:44:32 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 26, 2013, 04:53:35 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Mar 26, 2013, 01:27:21 PM
More Ceratosaurus and Carnotaurus. Cannot go wrong with feathers or not, cos they were most definitely scaly beasts.

Ceratosaurus never struck me as being scary. I only liked seeing it because it's never received the movie treatment, ever.
IN the JPOG game, they are cannibalistic. I had three of them f**king kill and eat my Allosaurus o_o

That's... Not cannibalistic.

Allosaurus=/=Ceratosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Mar 26, 2013, 06:48:57 PM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Mar 26, 2013, 06:46:34 PM
Quote from: Gate on Mar 26, 2013, 06:44:32 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 26, 2013, 04:53:35 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Mar 26, 2013, 01:27:21 PM
More Ceratosaurus and Carnotaurus. Cannot go wrong with feathers or not, cos they were most definitely scaly beasts.

Ceratosaurus never struck me as being scary. I only liked seeing it because it's never received the movie treatment, ever.
IN the JPOG game, they are cannibalistic. I had three of them f**king kill and eat my Allosaurus o_o

That's... Not cannibalistic.

Allosaurus=/=Ceratosaurus.

I know that.


I was stating another fact. They're assholes in JPOG.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 26, 2013, 06:50:54 PM
I love them in JPOG.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Mar 26, 2013, 07:10:39 PM
Quote from: Gate on Mar 26, 2013, 06:48:57 PM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Mar 26, 2013, 06:46:34 PM
Quote from: Gate on Mar 26, 2013, 06:44:32 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 26, 2013, 04:53:35 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Mar 26, 2013, 01:27:21 PM
More Ceratosaurus and Carnotaurus. Cannot go wrong with feathers or not, cos they were most definitely scaly beasts.

Ceratosaurus never struck me as being scary. I only liked seeing it because it's never received the movie treatment, ever.
IN the JPOG game, they are cannibalistic. I had three of them f**king kill and eat my Allosaurus o_o

That's... Not cannibalistic.

Allosaurus=/=Ceratosaurus.

I know that.


I was stating another fact. They're assholes in JPOG.

Every carnivore will attack another of their species if they're stressed, which usually means the exhibit they're in isn't suitable for them.

And every carnivore will attack different species for territory, with a few exceptions.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Mar 26, 2013, 08:05:05 PM
Anytime we hear good news for JP IV, this picture should follow

(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/483850_535083766536511_911715801_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 26, 2013, 08:06:58 PM
Hahaha, YES!!

You crazy son of a bitch, you did it!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Mar 26, 2013, 08:11:36 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Mar 26, 2013, 04:32:58 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Mar 26, 2013, 02:26:12 PM
http://www.home.lv/dinoworld/lw27.jpg
I love this photo.
Aye, it's a good one. My favorite Raptor shot however would be this.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg560.imageshack.us%2Fimg560%2F3072%2Ftlwraptor.jpg&hash=81597e7e74710d72f751e9252fe1b0997fe95763)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 26, 2013, 08:16:43 PM
Yup, I agree! That was my iPod screensaver for a while. Such a great shot.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Mar 27, 2013, 03:56:17 AM
was this posted yet?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQlEE4aVgOk#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQlEE4aVgOk#ws)

(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/580382_535431179835103_1225150124_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 27, 2013, 07:16:55 PM
My thoughts on the director's choice to have no feathers in JP4...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPqpwfXdYQU#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPqpwfXdYQU#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 27, 2013, 07:21:06 PM
A really dumb choice, i think. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 27, 2013, 08:38:18 PM
Keeping external continuity is a dumb choice?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 27, 2013, 10:04:38 PM
They can easily have new dinosaurs that have feathers and keep the dinos from the older films featherless, avoiding continuity issues. :P (Or just have a blend of dinos with feathers and a few without like JP3 raptors)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 27, 2013, 10:06:38 PM
I'm not bothered either way.

I'm just going to site here in an isolated bubble and imagine that dinosaurs didn't have feathers and that Pluto is a planet, anyways. Screw science ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Mar 27, 2013, 10:08:56 PM
Question, can we watch Jurassic Park 3D in 2D at the theaters?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 27, 2013, 10:13:56 PM
If its like the Star Wars release last year, probably only a very limited 2D release.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Mar 27, 2013, 10:27:10 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 27, 2013, 10:06:38 PM
I'm not bothered either way.

I'm just going to site here in an isolated bubble and imagine that dinosaurs didn't have feathers and that Pluto is a planet, anyways. Screw science ;)

This is my life ever since I learned dinosaurs have feathers. :laugh:

Thanks Discovery Channel. :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 27, 2013, 10:29:00 PM
Not all of them did, eh.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Mar 27, 2013, 10:30:22 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Mar 27, 2013, 10:29:00 PM
Not all of them did, eh.

I know, but a lot of the cool ones turned out to. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 27, 2013, 11:00:01 PM
You conservative bastards.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 27, 2013, 11:16:51 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 27, 2013, 10:06:38 PM
I'm just going to site here in an isolated bubble and imagine that dinosaurs didn't have feathers and that Pluto is a planet, anyways. Screw science ;)

That's not what JP4 is doing with its featherless dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 27, 2013, 11:21:48 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Mar 27, 2013, 10:30:22 PM
I know, but a lot of the cool ones turned out to. :laugh:
But many cool ones are either 'not confirmed' or are definitely scaly.

Like these guys:
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/528808_10151252590093391_1208076969_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 27, 2013, 11:25:45 PM
Chameleon skinned Carnotaurus needs to be in one JP flick eventually :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Mar 27, 2013, 11:26:26 PM
Pfft, you say that like there's something wrong with feathers. Hawkman would like a word with you on that one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Mar 27, 2013, 11:26:59 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Mar 27, 2013, 11:25:45 PM
Chameleon skinned Carnotaurus needs to be in one JP flick eventually :P

This.

So much this.

Just...


Just yes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Mar 28, 2013, 12:17:55 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Mar 27, 2013, 11:21:48 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Mar 27, 2013, 10:30:22 PM
I know, but a lot of the cool ones turned out to. :laugh:
But many cool ones are either 'not confirmed' or are definitely scaly.

Like these guys:
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/528808_10151252590093391_1208076969_n.jpg)

Well, yeah. :P

I'm just purposely looking at it with nostalgia glasses, I'm okay with dinosaurs having feathers (hell some look pretty badass), but I just prefer the scaly look in fiction. :P

Quote from: Blacklabel on Mar 27, 2013, 11:25:45 PM
Chameleon skinned Carnotaurus needs to be in one JP flick eventually :P

Well now they have excuses to have them in it, and if it did happen, I would be so f**king happy. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Mar 28, 2013, 12:21:24 AM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Mar 28, 2013, 12:17:55 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Mar 27, 2013, 11:25:45 PM
Chameleon skinned Carnotaurus needs to be in one JP flick eventually :P

Well now they have excuses to have them in it, and if it did happen, I would be so f**king happy. ;D

This. It was one of the very best parts of the TLW novel. It was also pretty cool in the arcade shooter.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Mar 28, 2013, 02:22:52 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi49.tinypic.com%2Franiuo.jpg&hash=d97670958f82d2fc6dd20850c60faba584a8b7b5)
https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/jurassic-park-20th-anniversary/id621507165 (https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/jurassic-park-20th-anniversary/id621507165)

To coincide with the 3D rerelease next month, a newly remastered iTunes-exclusive deluxe edition of John Williams' classic score has been released, with four new bonus tracks, almost making this a complete score. Unfortunately, the iTunes encode is (as always) completely shit, and some of the tracks feature audio drop outs and clipped endings. ::)

Track listing:
01. Opening Titles (0:32)
02. Theme From Jurassic Park (3:25)
03. Incident At Isla Nublar (5:18)
04. Journey To The Island (8:52)
05. The Raptor Attack (2:48)
06. Hatching Baby Raptor (3:19)
07. Welcome To Jurassic Park (7:53
08. My Friend, The Brachiosaurus (4:13)
09. Dennis Steals The Embryo (5:01)
10. A Tree For My Bed (2:09)
11. High-Wire Stunts (4:08)
12. Remembering Petticoat Lane (2:46)
13. Jurassic Park Gate (2:01)
14. Eye To Eye (6:31)
15. T-Rex Rescue & Finale (7:41)
16. End Credits (3:24)

Brand new bonus tracks:
17. The History Lesson (2:28)
18. Stalling Around (2:32)
19. The Coming Storm (3:58)
20. Hungry Raptor (2:05) 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 28, 2013, 02:28:48 AM
I'd be all for Carnotaurus appearing in the movie since he's appeared in a few toys released in the JP line since 1994. I wouldn't hold my breath though because they don't seem very interested in introducing new dinosaurs and building them up; i.e. Ceratosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Mar 28, 2013, 03:09:55 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Mar 28, 2013, 02:22:52 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi49.tinypic.com%2Franiuo.jpg&hash=d97670958f82d2fc6dd20850c60faba584a8b7b5)
https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/jurassic-park-20th-anniversary/id621507165 (https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/jurassic-park-20th-anniversary/id621507165)

To coincide with the 3D rerelease next month, a newly remastered iTunes-exclusive deluxe edition of John Williams' classic score has been released, with four new bonus tracks, almost making this a complete score. Unfortunately, the iTunes encode is (as always) completely shit, and some of the tracks feature audio drop outs and clipped endings. ::)

Track listing:
01. Opening Titles (0:32)
02. Theme From Jurassic Park (3:25)
03. Incident At Isla Nublar (5:18)
04. Journey To The Island (8:52)
05. The Raptor Attack (2:48)
06. Hatching Baby Raptor (3:19)
07. Welcome To Jurassic Park (7:53
08. My Friend, The Brachiosaurus (4:13)
09. Dennis Steals The Embryo (5:01)
10. A Tree For My Bed (2:09)
11. High-Wire Stunts (4:08)
12. Remembering Petticoat Lane (2:46)
13. Jurassic Park Gate (2:01)
14. Eye To Eye (6:31)
15. T-Rex Rescue & Finale (7:41)
16. End Credits (3:24)

Brand new bonus tracks:
17. The History Lesson (2:28)
18. Stalling Around (2:32)
19. The Coming Storm (3:58)
20. Hungry Raptor (2:05) 

It's missing one important bonus track:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cCGeHIa4Pk# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cCGeHIa4Pk#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 28, 2013, 03:25:45 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Mar 28, 2013, 02:22:52 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi49.tinypic.com%2Franiuo.jpg&hash=d97670958f82d2fc6dd20850c60faba584a8b7b5)
https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/jurassic-park-20th-anniversary/id621507165 (https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/jurassic-park-20th-anniversary/id621507165)

To coincide with the 3D rerelease next month, a newly remastered iTunes-exclusive deluxe edition of John Williams' classic score has been released, with four new bonus tracks, almost making this a complete score. Unfortunately, the iTunes encode is (as always) completely shit, and some of the tracks feature audio drop outs and clipped endings. ::)

Track listing:
01. Opening Titles (0:32)
02. Theme From Jurassic Park (3:25)
03. Incident At Isla Nublar (5:18)
04. Journey To The Island (8:52)
05. The Raptor Attack (2:48)
06. Hatching Baby Raptor (3:19)
07. Welcome To Jurassic Park (7:53
08. My Friend, The Brachiosaurus (4:13)
09. Dennis Steals The Embryo (5:01)
10. A Tree For My Bed (2:09)
11. High-Wire Stunts (4:08)
12. Remembering Petticoat Lane (2:46)
13. Jurassic Park Gate (2:01)
14. Eye To Eye (6:31)
15. T-Rex Rescue & Finale (7:41)
16. End Credits (3:24)

Brand new bonus tracks:
17. The History Lesson (2:28)
18. Stalling Around (2:32)
19. The Coming Storm (3:58)
20. Hungry Raptor (2:05)

Yep!  Got that earlier!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Mar 28, 2013, 05:26:00 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnLgtGanMlA#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnLgtGanMlA#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 28, 2013, 10:23:23 AM
NEED that score!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Mar 28, 2013, 01:46:29 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Mar 28, 2013, 05:26:00 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnLgtGanMlA#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnLgtGanMlA#ws)

A couple of friends and I already decided on seeing this, going to be so awesome seeing Jurassic Park on the big screen for the first time. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Mar 28, 2013, 04:15:00 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UbRrlzsZwQ#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UbRrlzsZwQ#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Mar 28, 2013, 04:29:07 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Mar 28, 2013, 01:46:29 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Mar 28, 2013, 05:26:00 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnLgtGanMlA#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnLgtGanMlA#ws)

A couple of friends and I already decided on seeing this, going to be so awesome seeing Jurassic Park on the big screen for the first time. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

I am looking forward to it myself. It was my first film I watched in a theater. Granted I was 3 at the time, but this is an opportunity that can't be passed up.

*adjusts nostalgia glasses*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master Chief on Mar 28, 2013, 04:58:22 PM
Can't wait. I watched it 5 times in the theater and now my daughter has a chance to experience it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 28, 2013, 05:03:37 PM
AWESOME trailer.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 28, 2013, 05:57:13 PM
Ah, man. That ad. I can feel my heart racing as my inner child struggles to crawl his way out through my sternum.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 28, 2013, 06:30:18 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Mar 28, 2013, 05:57:13 PM
Ah, man. That ad. I can feel my heart racing as my inner child struggles to crawl his way out through my sternum.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fit%2F8%2F80%2FAlien-The_Chestburster.png&hash=1deba74429e518b6909ac4d80a9d8fd0eff9b80c)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 28, 2013, 07:06:06 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Mar 28, 2013, 04:15:00 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UbRrlzsZwQ#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UbRrlzsZwQ#ws)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_ll13qgdbM81qec76vo1_250.gif&hash=84946d1ed7984bda89ef0a9e303c701e6fcf97b3)

No, but seriously, that was probably the best f**king edited trailer I've seen in my life.  I almost forgot that I've already seen this movie over a hundred times.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Mar 28, 2013, 07:09:05 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 28, 2013, 07:06:06 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Mar 28, 2013, 04:15:00 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UbRrlzsZwQ#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UbRrlzsZwQ#ws)

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ll13qgdbM81qec76vo1_250.gif


(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F24.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_m3tp2o1RL21rs4lu6o1_500.gif&hash=4c517bd6adcbfad3489ffa99214a12a699350afe)

* I'm going to have to make a Face/Off set soon; and need to get it on blu ray

(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/540689_535879056456982_2085534449_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Mar 28, 2013, 09:29:36 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Mar 28, 2013, 04:15:00 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UbRrlzsZwQ#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UbRrlzsZwQ#ws)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reactiongifs.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F05%2Famazing.gif&hash=e8b1575485476ee9af755ffbd4d5ac9f2eb60ff6)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 28, 2013, 11:54:06 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Mar 28, 2013, 06:30:18 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Mar 28, 2013, 05:57:13 PM
Ah, man. That ad. I can feel my heart racing as my inner child struggles to crawl his way out through my sternum.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fit%2F8%2F80%2FAlien-The_Chestburster.png&hash=1deba74429e518b6909ac4d80a9d8fd0eff9b80c)

Yep.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Mar 29, 2013, 12:12:49 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvHzTnfZUjY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvHzTnfZUjY#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightlord on Mar 29, 2013, 12:31:38 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Mar 29, 2013, 12:12:49 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvHzTnfZUjY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvHzTnfZUjY#ws)
Awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 29, 2013, 12:57:52 AM
You know... with some better animatronics and better textures on those suits... they could easily work on film :) They would just have to cgi-out the performer's legs underneath. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Mar 29, 2013, 01:33:39 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Mar 28, 2013, 11:54:06 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Mar 28, 2013, 06:30:18 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Mar 28, 2013, 05:57:13 PM
Ah, man. That ad. I can feel my heart racing as my inner child struggles to crawl his way out through my sternum.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fit%2F8%2F80%2FAlien-The_Chestburster.png&hash=1deba74429e518b6909ac4d80a9d8fd0eff9b80c)

Yep.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_m5jisew4pd1qh980ao1_500.gif&hash=6c9189d0922a646efd4f697e4a07bdf4c49e932a)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 29, 2013, 02:28:18 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Mar 28, 2013, 05:57:13 PM
Ah, man. That ad. I can feel my heart racing as my inner child struggles to crawl his way out through my sternum.

How does this make you feel:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AlkgVQVJZ1E# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AlkgVQVJZ1E#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Mar 29, 2013, 04:33:18 AM
I only ever had the stego toy as a kid, so that's not doing much for me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 29, 2013, 04:47:41 AM
You poor thing :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Mar 29, 2013, 04:56:38 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Mar 29, 2013, 04:33:18 AM
I only ever had the stego toy as a kid, so that's not doing much for me.
You...
          ...only...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg17.imageshack.us%2Fimg17%2F7225%2Falcoholakibaavy.png&hash=19236a2df98b40407a2a660611c8b5f90b5aa048)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Mar 29, 2013, 03:51:40 PM
Hey it's better than me, I never owned any of the toys. :P

...
Spoiler
Excuse me. :'(
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: XenoVC on Mar 30, 2013, 07:29:32 AM
Looks like the 'Homocraptor/Dinos with Guns' JPIV script has finally been found in it's entirety, and what timing too.

It's every bit as bad as that AICN report described it all those years ago, and feels so disconnected to the point of not really feeling JP related at all.

Only element from this script I could POSSIBLY, and maybe not even that great of a chance, see showing up in the final film is the
Spoiler
return of Isla Nublar with Dinosaurs, which isn't that new of an idea anyway, and depending on the EU you're looking at for the film, was bombed, or wasn't bombed.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 30, 2013, 11:01:48 AM
I prefer it not being bombed and all.

Do you have the script?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 30, 2013, 03:18:23 PM
Can i have the script too, pls? :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Mar 30, 2013, 04:09:13 PM
Doom, thought you would be happy to know that Burger King will have Jurassic Park kid's meal toys soon!



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3IJQjhdLbbo#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3IJQjhdLbbo#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 30, 2013, 04:55:12 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Mar 30, 2013, 04:09:13 PM
Doom, thought you would be happy to know that Burger King will have Jurassic Park kid's meal toys soon!

;D

Now to just make sure I can avoid eating fast food entirely until that comes out...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 30, 2013, 06:08:34 PM
I can't wait for all the new JP merchandise. What is wrong with me?!

Btw DOOM sorry you just added me on FB and I've deactivated my account. :-\ got Twitter? @Jack_Ewins
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 30, 2013, 07:33:46 PM
Lol, sure dude. @sam4reel
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 30, 2013, 10:01:01 PM
Completed a read through of the John Sayles script for JP4...

and it's actually....

a hell of a lot better than JP3. And for a script with a f**king insane-"DINOSoldiers!!!" concept.. there's a lot of actual science involved. There's also a nice balance between corporate intrigue and dinosaur "action" in this. And no.. none of the dinosaurs are equiped with guns... they are just used as a melee, ground assault force. Their enhanced smell is used to spot hostages across large distances.

Very easy to sympathize with the dinos in the story. By the end you'll want to see them take out their human masters.

It's in dire need of a better final sequence though... and the spanish in the script is really pathetic. "Legartos"? Baron Von Drax was straight out of a Bond movie. There are other problems, a few clichés here and there... but overall nice stuff that avoids a B-movie feel and avoids retreading the same path as JP3... no group of people getting lost on the island again... it's a B-movie idea with an A-movie treatment. just a few drafts far away from something truly badass.

The actual JP4 movie probably wont be as much bug nuts fun as this. :P I'm actually only expecting it to be another cliché-ridden retread of the past movies... Hope i'm proven wrong, though.

..actually... it reminded me of Rise of the Planet of the Apes at times... funnily enough JP4 is being done by the fellas who wrote that movie... wich is a funny coincidence... :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Mar 30, 2013, 10:07:53 PM
f**k that shit. This is JP, not Dinosaucers or Extreme Dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 30, 2013, 10:09:31 PM
There's actually nothing of that in the script.

No dinos with guns.... they dont look even remotely human (as Carlos Huante drew them as)... they dont act in any human way either.

They are essentially used as trained attack dogs... except these are smarter and deadlier.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Mar 30, 2013, 10:24:08 PM
Eh, still don't like the vibe.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 30, 2013, 10:54:51 PM
Read the script and you'll probably enjoy bits of it  :laugh:

one of the best parts is that the Dilophosaurus is back.. in packs :) But they gave them a new scientific name.. probably because the dilophosaurus from Jurassic Park doesnt resemble the actual animal that much with their frilled neck. :P

The "excavaraptors" are just.. a bit too silly, i'm afraid... I'd probably swap them out with Carnotaurus from the books ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Mar 30, 2013, 10:57:13 PM
Enjoying bits of it isn't enough, my dear Frodo.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 30, 2013, 10:59:45 PM
You sure? Because there's a kronosaurus in this script, gandalf.... :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Mar 30, 2013, 11:01:48 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Mar 30, 2013, 10:57:13 PM
Enjoying bits of it isn't enough, my dear Frodo.

And I was quoting Bilbo. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 30, 2013, 11:06:06 PM
 >:(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: XenoVC on Mar 31, 2013, 06:00:58 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Mar 30, 2013, 10:59:45 PM
You sure? Because there's a kronosaurus in this script, gandalf.... :laugh:

Sure, there's a Kronosaurus.

Spoiler
For what would equate to about 20 seconds in the actual movie, Sayles finally brings in an aquatic reptile to the series, and it's somehow been floating off the coast of Nublar, and this is all we get?
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 31, 2013, 09:07:40 AM
As a huge JP fan I'm not reading that script.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 31, 2013, 10:11:59 AM
I am.

Cause if the actual film is disappointing, I can always say 'well, it's better than that script'.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 31, 2013, 10:59:36 AM
Quote from: XenoVC on Mar 31, 2013, 06:00:58 AM
Sure, there's a Kronosaurus.

Spoiler
For what would equate to about 20 seconds in the actual movie, Sayles finally brings in an aquatic reptile to the series, and it's somehow been floating off the coast of Nublar, and this is all we get?
[close]

The Kronosaurus TAKES DOWN A PLANE, kills 1 dude and nearly om noms noms the main character... and you want more? :P

Hell, that's more memorable than the 1 kill the dilophosaurus got in the first film. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Mar 31, 2013, 12:37:56 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Mar 31, 2013, 10:59:36 AM
Quote from: XenoVC on Mar 31, 2013, 06:00:58 AM
Sure, there's a Kronosaurus.

Spoiler
For what would equate to about 20 seconds in the actual movie, Sayles finally brings in an aquatic reptile to the series, and it's somehow been floating off the coast of Nublar, and this is all we get?
[close]

The Kronosaurus TAKES DOWN A PLANE, kills 1 dude and nearly om noms noms the main character... and you want more? :P

Hell, that's more memorable than the 1 kill the dilophosaurus got in the first film. :P

A kronosaurus taking down a plane.. I'm a bit fuzzy on what I know about marine reptiles, but I'm pretty sure a Kronosaurus can't fly....
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 31, 2013, 12:40:36 PM
Maybe the plane was hovering over the water.

Reminds me of Lake Placid, ya know.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 31, 2013, 12:53:33 PM
^ bingo. The kronosaurus jumps and bites the tail of the small plane... as it hovers above water.

aw just read the damn script will ya, folks? :laugh:

http://www.sendspace.com/file/bjwknf (http://www.sendspace.com/file/bjwknf)

The very first scene reminded me of Gremlins...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 31, 2013, 01:11:34 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Mar 31, 2013, 12:53:33 PM
^ bingo. The kronosaurus jumps and bites the tail of the small plane... as it hovers above water.
Here's something they could transfer to the actual film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 31, 2013, 01:24:00 PM
The only action scenes in the script that felt "off" to me were the ones with the "Excavaraptors" and the ones with the Pterosaurs chasing down the kids... The first one due to being based around a type of dinosaur made up for the script and the second one due to it having the goofy feel and humor of the T-Rex smashing San Diego in Lost World.

Everything else felt legit and properly badass. (over the top? yep. But badass.. and a more entertaining roller coaster than the third film.) the dialogue and characters was head and shoulders above the 3rd film too.

oh and btw.. Ankylosaurus, madafakas.  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nychus on Mar 31, 2013, 01:42:24 PM
What can I say, this picture kinda sums up the whole soup:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jptoys.com%2Ftoy-database%2Fchaos-effect%2Fprototypes%2Fdilaphospinus%2Fimg%2FDilaphospinus.jpg&hash=93c6b3779e1641f3f895584262248475a1ea9075)

Like already stated at JPL, it appears more like a spin-off than a true sequel and I think Sayles was definitely not being serious with this. It reads off as something that he was writing to merely play tongue-in-cheek and there probably were a lot of re-writes judging by the Homocraptor art that followed. While the human characters are interestingly written the main attractions weren't being treated passionately, most evident being the Dilophosaurus that Sayles not only calls "Chlamydosaurus" in obvious reference to the Australian frilled lizard but also gives it physical traits that simply could not exist in the creature that we saw in the first movie without being a horribly executed retcon(kinda like the Sornaensis Raptors being presented as Nublarensis identity). Don't even get me started with the "Excavaraptors" and the random Pteranodon attack of the last page. Von Drax wasn't all that interesting and played out as some Mission Impossible type of antagonist with convenient second hand thugs doing his bidding out of loyalty and greed.

What I did like about it;

- Nublar as a returning location at the beginning.
- The Deinonychus/Velociraptor being capable of changing skin color akin to Carnotaurus and Raptors of the novels as that makes them more intimidating(I know some will disagree).
- Dilophosaurus being at least featured as a more recurring threat. Same with Ankylosaurus.
- The main characters having well established backgrounds(save for the aforementioned villain).

Definitely not a proper JP sequel that we are wishing although I did enjoy reading it. Nevertheless, Jurassic Park: The Game pretty much owns this in every conceivable way as the Barbasol can plot line and I'm happy that TellTale had the chance to make it a reality instead of this becoming a movie.

A lackluster sequel spin-off that we are definitely better off without although it makes me all that more curious about what else Universal is up to now.

Final score: 5.6 out of 10.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 31, 2013, 02:16:04 PM
Didnt you get "Rise of the Planet of the Apes" vibes? Specially with the "Spartacus" deynonichus?

Kinda funny that writers in the film right now are the ones responsible for "that" flick.  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Mar 31, 2013, 02:44:58 PM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Mar 31, 2013, 12:37:56 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Mar 31, 2013, 10:59:36 AM
Quote from: XenoVC on Mar 31, 2013, 06:00:58 AM
Sure, there's a Kronosaurus.

Spoiler
For what would equate to about 20 seconds in the actual movie, Sayles finally brings in an aquatic reptile to the series, and it's somehow been floating off the coast of Nublar, and this is all we get?
[close]

The Kronosaurus TAKES DOWN A PLANE, kills 1 dude and nearly om noms noms the main character... and you want more? :P

Hell, that's more memorable than the 1 kill the dilophosaurus got in the first film. :P

A kronosaurus taking down a plane.. I'm a bit fuzzy on what I know about marine reptiles, but I'm pretty sure a Kronosaurus can't fly....

It's related to Mega Shark, duh... :P

Quote from: Blacklabel on Mar 31, 2013, 12:53:33 PM
^ bingo. The kronosaurus jumps and bites the tail of the small plane... as it hovers above water.

aw just read the damn script will ya, folks? :laugh:

http://www.sendspace.com/file/bjwknf (http://www.sendspace.com/file/bjwknf)

The very first scene reminded me of Gremlins...

Oh... :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nychus on Mar 31, 2013, 03:45:47 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Mar 31, 2013, 02:16:04 PM
Didnt you get "Rise of the Planet of the Apes" vibes? Specially with the "Spartacus" deynonichus?

Kinda funny that writers in the film right now are the ones responsible for "that" flick.  :P
Life is full of irony. And yeah, the end did remind me of the apes departing to the woods only in here they're the dinosaurs. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Mar 31, 2013, 03:57:25 PM
Eh, gonna give the script a read for fun.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Mar 31, 2013, 04:03:30 PM
It's a quick read. Honestly, the idea of going back to Nulbar was pretty awesome. But the script was full of too much dumb crap for me to care. The Kronosaur part was actually awesome, but felt way too random and had zero explanation.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 31, 2013, 05:15:35 PM
Quote from: Nychus on Mar 31, 2013, 01:42:24 PM
What can I say, this picture kinda sums up the whole soup:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jptoys.com%2Ftoy-database%2Fchaos-effect%2Fprototypes%2Fdilaphospinus%2Fimg%2FDilaphospinus.jpg&hash=93c6b3779e1641f3f895584262248475a1ea9075)

Ah, Chaos Effect; made for a crazy toy line 8)

Did you know that was actually supposed to be the storyline for a JP TV show released after TLW?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Mar 31, 2013, 05:23:22 PM
^ Haha, remember having an Ian Malcolm figure from that line. Looked silly as f**k in a bright yellow jumpsuit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Mar 31, 2013, 07:39:17 PM
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/541233_537051386339749_1308470987_n.png)

per JP facebook page

http://www.jurassicpark.com/SweepsRules/ (http://www.jurassicpark.com/SweepsRules/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: XenoVC on Mar 31, 2013, 09:24:51 PM
Oh, and how can Isla Sorna not be mentioned in the Sayles script, the island from the past two movies?

The Pteranodons are presumably the ones from the end of JP3, and when the magical Compies on coconut rafts, along with the other stories, are about to be explained, it's said they're strictly from Isla Nublar.

Not even a quick status update? Grendel was able to secure Nublar for themselves, but what about the bigger production floor with the entire dinosaur ecosystem? Come on.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 31, 2013, 11:01:21 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Mar 31, 2013, 07:39:17 PM
https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/541233_537051386339749_1308470987_n.png

per JP facebook page

http://www.jurassicpark.com/SweepsRules/ (http://www.jurassicpark.com/SweepsRules/)

Would be awesome to win.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 31, 2013, 11:19:57 PM
Quote from: XenoVC on Mar 31, 2013, 09:24:51 PM
and when the magical Compies on coconut rafts, along with the other stories, are about to be explained, it's said they're strictly from Isla Nublar.

what was so "magical" about it? And why the need to be explained? Small lizards, mammals and other critters are sometimes found to use pieces of wood, coconuts, and other floating objects to "accidentaly" drift from island to island or from continent to island and vice versa. ...that's just a real life example being applied to the fictional world. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 01, 2013, 03:04:37 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Mar 31, 2013, 05:23:22 PM
^ Haha, remember having an Ian Malcolm figure from that line. Looked silly as f**k in a bright yellow jumpsuit.

They were all a little kooky. Still they made for some fun toys. I'm working on getting them all, once I complete my JP Series II set.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: cloverfan98 on Apr 01, 2013, 05:19:23 AM
Quote from: XenoVC on Mar 30, 2013, 07:29:32 AM
Looks like the 'Homocraptor/Dinos with Guns' JPIV script has finally been found in it's entirety, and what timing too.

It's every bit as bad as that AICN report described it all those years ago, and feels so disconnected to the point of not really feeling JP related at all.

Only element from this script I could POSSIBLY, and maybe not even that great of a chance, see showing up in the final film is the
Spoiler
return of Isla Nublar with Dinosaurs, which isn't that new of an idea anyway, and depending on the EU you're looking at for the film, was bombed, or wasn't bombed.
[close]


WOAHWOAHWOAHWOAH!!!! THE legendary JP4 script? LINK PLEAZE?????
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 01, 2013, 08:29:29 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 31, 2013, 05:15:35 PM
Did you know that was actually supposed to be the storyline for a JP TV show released after TLW?

I die a little inside thinking of that amazing show that was never made. Same goes for the Aliens cartoon.

8 year old me would have f**king loved them both!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bad Replicant on Apr 02, 2013, 06:37:02 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thejustinjohnsonshow.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F09%2FDennisNedry.jpeg&hash=f386e8625208151304fecd4aeb12f3a1838fdb47)(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thejustinjohnsonshow.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F09%2FDennisNedry.jpeg&hash=f386e8625208151304fecd4aeb12f3a1838fdb47)(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thejustinjohnsonshow.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F09%2FDennisNedry.jpeg&hash=f386e8625208151304fecd4aeb12f3a1838fdb47)(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thejustinjohnsonshow.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F09%2FDennisNedry.jpeg&hash=f386e8625208151304fecd4aeb12f3a1838fdb47)(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thejustinjohnsonshow.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F09%2FDennisNedry.jpeg&hash=f386e8625208151304fecd4aeb12f3a1838fdb47)(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thejustinjohnsonshow.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F09%2FDennisNedry.jpeg&hash=f386e8625208151304fecd4aeb12f3a1838fdb47)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Sharp Sticks on Apr 02, 2013, 06:37:50 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-3qTUR4A47n8%2FTxVt5m9yVWI%2FAAAAAAAAAGw%2F4xoTjS7Yh3U%2Fs1600%2Fjurassicpark4.PNG&hash=ed2630f5da1c41338e8750c145a2d7243d5ae656)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 02, 2013, 06:40:10 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thehollywoodnews.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F5467814_4_l.jpg&hash=5d8a6eea00b5b7e8f8453f0a29b889393c47c403)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Apr 02, 2013, 06:44:09 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg248.imageshack.us%2Fimg248%2F5975%2Fjurassicpark10637.png&hash=8bb478b1c2875a5ba3b308a07814c342c9c16afa)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 02, 2013, 08:19:11 AM
Just ordered Jurassic Park and The Lost World on Laserdisc. 8)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.ebayimg.com%2Ft%2FJURASSIC-PARK-AND-THE-LOST-WORLD-JURASSIC-PARK-LASERDISC-LD-%2F00%2Fs%2FMTIwMFgxNjAw%2F%24%28KGrHqN%2C%21okFCf%2ByY9FsBQ48448rfg%7E%7E60_35.JPG&hash=bd545496c39401733429d72b200cbfa6d926b825)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mike’s Monsters on Apr 02, 2013, 08:23:05 AM
JP3D was fantastic, it felt like I was seeing it first the first time again. And I couldn't tell you how many times I've seen Jurassic Park. There were so many things I'd never noticed before, but it was probably more due to the restoration they did to it. I was very impressed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 02, 2013, 08:51:07 AM
So the 3D effects didn't feel out of place then, considering the film was never meant for 3D in the first place?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Apr 02, 2013, 11:40:53 AM
I'd rather have Isla Nublar Napalmed to fit with the Telltale and the 'new' canon because the game itself was an amazing addition to the Jp1 storyline and I'd hate to see it overwritten
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 02, 2013, 11:46:01 AM
Naaaaaah Nublar should be left mostly unharmed. I would love it if they actually went back to or at least mentioned the island, definitely erasing the dubious canonicity of that deleted TLW boardroom scene.

I mean, that plenty of ruins JP's finale.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 02, 2013, 03:16:58 PM
I love this thread!

Quote from: Mikey on Apr 02, 2013, 08:23:05 AM
JP3D was fantastic, it felt like I was seeing it first the first time again. And I couldn't tell you how many times I've seen Jurassic Park. There were so many things I'd never noticed before, but it was probably more due to the restoration they did to it. I was very impressed.

That's great to hear. I just hope I'll experience it the same way, since I finally got the Jurassic Park trilogy on Blu-Ray the other day and spent the whole day studying all the enhanced details I haven't noticed all the hundreds of times before. 

Also, the new bonus featurettes were great to watch; how the cast looks now and looking back at their experiences, for all 3 films.  I'm also inclined to think that they may go back to the Barbosol can for the embryos in JPIV since it was Spielber's original idea for the first sequel.  He seemed very keen on bringing out that untold story during the interview.  I also enjoyed the appropriate memoriam to Michael Crichton and Stan Winston on the 3rd disc.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Apr 02, 2013, 04:23:46 PM
When the f**k are they going to start putting a cast together for JP4?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Apr 02, 2013, 04:33:52 PM
It would be cool if they give us a JP4 teaser similar how we got a AVP teaser for the Alien re-release 10 years ago.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 02, 2013, 04:36:51 PM
If it was the Sayles script... here's a little fan cast:

Troy Baker as Nick (a very thin, lean ex-military guy)
Jessica Chastain as Maya (yes, another Maya eh, i'd change the character's name though. lol)
Bryan Cranston as Joyce
Michael Fassbender as Baron Von Drax (yes, casting a favourite for the bond role as a sort of bond villain, going against the bald, fat "Goldfinger" stereotype i got from reading the script)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 02, 2013, 05:08:14 PM
Look what arrived today 8)

http://instagram.com/p/XnBPlDlEgr/?intent=comment (http://instagram.com/p/XnBPlDlEgr/?intent=comment)

Ah, I miss the 90s...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Apr 02, 2013, 05:41:49 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Apr 02, 2013, 04:23:46 PM
When the f**k are they going to start putting a cast together for JP4?

The script is likely not finish. It won't surprise me if they push it to July 2015.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Apr 02, 2013, 07:15:32 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Apr 02, 2013, 05:41:49 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Apr 02, 2013, 04:23:46 PM
When the f**k are they going to start putting a cast together for JP4?

The script is likely not finish. It won't surprise me if they push it to July 2015.

You can't set a release date without greenlighting the film. And you can't do so without a finished script which executives like. This film has both a release date and a director. Not to mention production design is already underway. They might be polishing the script (which is common), but a solid version of the final script has to be ready for them to move into solid pre-production and set a release date.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Sexy Poot on Apr 02, 2013, 07:39:16 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 02, 2013, 05:08:14 PM
Look what arrived today 8)

http://instagram.com/p/XnBPlDlEgr/?intent=comment (http://instagram.com/p/XnBPlDlEgr/?intent=comment)

Ah, I miss the 90s...

Haha awesome. I still have my JP2 figures in a box downstairs. Big ol T-rex who roars.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 02, 2013, 08:24:41 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Apr 02, 2013, 07:15:32 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Apr 02, 2013, 05:41:49 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Apr 02, 2013, 04:23:46 PM
When the f**k are they going to start putting a cast together for JP4?

The script is likely not finish. It won't surprise me if they push it to July 2015.

You can't set a release date without greenlighting the film. And you can't do so without a finished script which executives like. This film has both a release date and a director. Not to mention production design is already underway. They might be polishing the script (which is common), but a solid version of the final script has to be ready for them to move into solid pre-production and set a release date.

Exactly.  I can only assume that they will start announcing all that stuff this month.  Shooting may start later this month, as was rumored with that booked Louisiana filming lot. It also kinda make sense since Godzilla is scheduled to be released a month before JP4 and has started filming last month.  Just very hopeful thinking!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 03, 2013, 02:28:53 AM
http://bloody-disgusting.com/news/3226460/random-cool-watch-helen-hunt-and-gwyneth-paltrow-vie-for-laura-derns-role-in-jurassic-park/ (http://bloody-disgusting.com/news/3226460/random-cool-watch-helen-hunt-and-gwyneth-paltrow-vie-for-laura-derns-role-in-jurassic-park/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Apr 03, 2013, 03:46:07 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sgjDSfbB2ok#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sgjDSfbB2ok#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Apr 03, 2013, 03:49:53 AM
 :laugh:

That was sweet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Apr 03, 2013, 03:54:13 AM
QuoteYou can't set a release date without greenlighting the film. And you can't do so without a finished script which executives like. This film has both a release date and a director. Not to mention production design is already underway. They might be polishing the script (which is common), but a solid version of the final script has to be ready for them to move into solid pre-production and set a release date.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com.au%2Furl%3Fsource%3Dimglanding%26amp%3Bct%3Dimg%26amp%3Bq%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fcameronricedotcom.files.wordpress.com%2F2012%2F06%2Ftumblr_lvt1f0rovj1qla7y0o1_500.jpg%26amp%3Bsa%3DX%26amp%3Bei%3DdKdbUZr5OoS0kQXSuYGwCQ%26amp%3Bved%3D0CAoQ8wc4Sg%26amp%3Busg%3DAFQjCNFVInTcOV9gjlH40AoadrIYmHh-Bg&hash=7312d78bc59f9d4d75d5d792709896ad0093c9ba)

I am David's eternal exasperation.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mike’s Monsters on Apr 03, 2013, 04:03:48 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 02, 2013, 08:51:07 AM
So the 3D effects didn't feel out of place then, considering the film was never meant for 3D in the first place?

Not at all. You can tell they spent the last 5 years taking their time with the conversion.
I can honestly say that the 3D makes you feel the excitement again, I was tensing at the scenes with the Rex. And I know this whole movie like the back of my hand.
The sound and remastered visuals really hold up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 03, 2013, 05:22:03 AM
Quote from: Hubbs on Apr 03, 2013, 03:46:07 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sgjDSfbB2ok#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sgjDSfbB2ok#ws)

Omfg XD, that was awesome.

Quote from: Mikey on Apr 03, 2013, 04:03:48 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 02, 2013, 08:51:07 AM
So the 3D effects didn't feel out of place then, considering the film was never meant for 3D in the first place?

Not at all. You can tell they spent the last 5 years taking their time with the conversion.
I can honestly say that the 3D makes you feel the excitement again, I was tensing at the scenes with the Rex. And I know this whole movie like the back of my hand.
The sound and remastered visuals really hold up.

Good. I was concerned given the movie's age.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: chrisr232007 on Apr 03, 2013, 05:53:13 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 03, 2013, 05:22:03 AM
Quote from: Hubbs on Apr 03, 2013, 03:46:07 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sgjDSfbB2ok#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sgjDSfbB2ok#ws)

Omfg XD, that was awesome.

Quote from: Mikey on Apr 03, 2013, 04:03:48 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 02, 2013, 08:51:07 AM
So the 3D effects didn't feel out of place then, considering the film was never meant for 3D in the first place?

Not at all. You can tell they spent the last 5 years taking their time with the conversion.
I can honestly say that the 3D makes you feel the excitement again, I was tensing at the scenes with the Rex. And I know this whole movie like the back of my hand.
The sound and remastered visuals really hold up.

Good. I was concerned given the movie's age.

This movie has aged well for being 20 years old, I mean it looks better then 90% of movies that have come out in the past ten years.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Apr 03, 2013, 09:38:20 AM
Nostalgia time: http://bloody-disgusting.com/news/3226460/random-cool-watch-helen-hunt-and-gwyneth-paltrow-vie-for-laura-derns-role-in-jurassic-park/ (http://bloody-disgusting.com/news/3226460/random-cool-watch-helen-hunt-and-gwyneth-paltrow-vie-for-laura-derns-role-in-jurassic-park/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Apr 03, 2013, 09:46:46 AM
Whoa, that's awesome. I definitely could've seen Helen Hunt in the role, but not Gwyneth Paltrow by a long shot. Not back then, at least.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Apr 03, 2013, 09:49:23 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Apr 03, 2013, 09:46:46 AM
Whoa, that's awesome. I definitely could've seen Helen Hunt in the role, but not Gwyneth Paltrow by a long shot. Not back then, at least.

I agree.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 03, 2013, 04:39:19 PM
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/66866_538306436214244_193038835_n.png)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 03, 2013, 04:41:01 PM
My favorite local cinema is doing 2D showings. Yessss. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 03, 2013, 04:43:05 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 03, 2013, 04:41:01 PM
My favorite local cinema is doing 2D showings. Yessss. 8)

Damn it! I'll have to check if my local Regal is doing the same.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Apr 03, 2013, 04:43:23 PM
I'm so f**king excited.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 03, 2013, 04:49:34 PM
This weekend is gonna be one epic double feature for me, at least if Evil Dead is as good as it looks.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 03, 2013, 04:50:34 PM
same, mine has one 2D screening each day around 2:30-2:45 time
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 03, 2013, 04:54:40 PM
Sweet, sweet $6 2D matinee.

Retrofitted gimmick 3D bullshit can go get f**ked.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Apr 03, 2013, 05:02:54 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Apr 03, 2013, 04:49:34 PM
This weekend is gonna be one epic double feature for me, at least if Evil Dead is as good as it looks.

Same here. Badass day coming up!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 03, 2013, 07:15:33 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2OpqDkPw5k#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2OpqDkPw5k#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 03, 2013, 08:30:58 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 03, 2013, 04:54:40 PM
Sweet, sweet $6 2D matinee.

Retrofitted gimmick 3D bullshit can go get f**ked.

Titanic was the best use of 3D I've seen, and that (obviously) was post. I'm looking forward to seeing what it can do for JP... in the four and a half bloody months it'll take to cross the Atlantic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 04, 2013, 01:32:03 AM
We're not the only ones celebrating the re-release, obviously....

(https://fbcdn-photos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/s720x720/67948_503202363075062_783524640_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Apr 04, 2013, 02:09:04 AM
tickets for all six 3D showings are sold out at my theater!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Apr 04, 2013, 02:12:37 AM
I have been convinced to go see this on the big screen on Friday.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 04, 2013, 02:30:23 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Apr 03, 2013, 09:38:20 AM
Nostalgia time: http://bloody-disgusting.com/news/3226460/random-cool-watch-helen-hunt-and-gwyneth-paltrow-vie-for-laura-derns-role-in-jurassic-park/ (http://bloody-disgusting.com/news/3226460/random-cool-watch-helen-hunt-and-gwyneth-paltrow-vie-for-laura-derns-role-in-jurassic-park/)

Not to be a jerk, but this was posted a page before yours :P

Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 04, 2013, 01:32:03 AM
We're not the only ones celebrating the re-release, obviously....

https://fbcdn-photos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/s720x720/67948_503202363075062_783524640_n.jpg


Aw man, I would so love to watch it with those two. Aaaaahhhhh, two more days ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Apr 04, 2013, 07:46:20 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 04, 2013, 01:32:03 AMWe're not the only ones celebrating the re-release, obviously....

https://fbcdn-photos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/s720x720/67948_503202363075062_783524640_n.jpg

They still look good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Apr 04, 2013, 01:30:27 PM
BK Jurassic Park toys will have an estimated arrival of next week. It is all being kept secret and going to be a huge surprise for I asked and even the employees had no idea what the toys would be.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 04, 2013, 04:26:42 PM
JURASSIC PARK 4 Will Make You "Want To Keep The Lights On" Says Paleontologist

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=76991#OIzvCxGxTCh3QQGH.99  (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=76991#OIzvCxGxTCh3QQGH.99)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 04, 2013, 04:53:25 PM
Horner doesn't specifically say if it's a dinosaur, and the article refers to it as an "extinct creature". Assuming there's some substance behind that phrasing (which is a little bit of a reach), I'd bet on something oceanic, for that Jaws factor. Probably a mosasaur or pliosaur.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 04, 2013, 05:06:06 PM
http://io9.com/billionaire-plans-to-fill-parks-with-hundreds-of-giant-468463493 (http://io9.com/billionaire-plans-to-fill-parks-with-hundreds-of-giant-468463493)

It begins...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Apr 04, 2013, 05:12:03 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 04, 2013, 04:26:42 PM
JURASSIC PARK 4 Will Make You "Want To Keep The Lights On" Says Paleontologist

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=76991#OIzvCxGxTCh3QQGH.99  (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=76991#OIzvCxGxTCh3QQGH.99)

I'm hoping for TLW novel style Carnotaurus, or JP the Game style Troodon. Preferably both.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 04, 2013, 06:16:51 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Apr 04, 2013, 04:53:25 PM
Horner doesn't specifically say if it's a dinosaur, and the article refers to it as an "extinct creature". Assuming there's some substance behind that phrasing (which is a little bit of a reach), I'd bet on something oceanic, for that Jaws factor. Probably a mosasaur or pliosaur.

Predator X ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 04, 2013, 07:10:41 PM
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/551496_538678402843714_73208700_n.png)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suYzpZVSwwU#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suYzpZVSwwU#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 04, 2013, 07:20:14 PM
Lol, that's all in regard to the JP version of Velociraptor :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 04, 2013, 07:22:14 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Apr 04, 2013, 07:10:41 PM
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/551496_538678402843714_73208700_n.png)
Stands almost two meters tall.

Weighs only 30 pounds.

Fail.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Apr 04, 2013, 07:27:04 PM
I like what I am hearing about it having the best post-converted 3D.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 04, 2013, 07:30:38 PM
apparently velociraptors were actually small, and the ones in the film were more like the utahraptor
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Apr 04, 2013, 07:34:20 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Apr 04, 2013, 07:30:38 PM
apparently velociraptors were actually small, and the ones in the film were more like the utahraptor

Yup. They were around thigh-waist high when compared to an average height man.

Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 04, 2013, 04:26:42 PM
JURASSIC PARK 4 Will Make You "Want To Keep The Lights On" Says Paleontologist

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=76991#OIzvCxGxTCh3QQGH.99  (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=76991#OIzvCxGxTCh3QQGH.99)

Ohoho shiiit. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Apr 04, 2013, 07:37:30 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-Hx_CqaTV8IE%2FUL1Y_bWSbLI%2FAAAAAAAAEh4%2FmYl9C_hM8Eo%2Fs1600%2F72d3febe_Dromie_scale.png&hash=e76540ef1636f7e49f857b18752ddb3e8eb709db)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 04, 2013, 07:37:37 PM
Even smaller than that I'd say...not much bigger than a poodle. Plus, they were completely covered in feathers and the toe-claws of Velociraptor in particular weren't sharp enough to actually slash through its prey.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 04, 2013, 07:40:10 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 04, 2013, 07:22:14 PM
Stands almost two meters tall.

Weighs only 30 pounds.

Fail.

Nerdy kid mode: The ones in the film were exagerated a bit in size... they are essentially Deinonychus. (Why they didnt use Deinonychus as a name for the dinos instead of the less accurate velociraptor, i'll never know)

They also had hollow bones, so that contributes a bit to the lesser weight.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 04, 2013, 07:41:08 PM
There is NO WAY 6 foot tall, 9 foot long animal weighs 30 pounds :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 04, 2013, 07:43:25 PM
Quite. Wich is why the poster reads that it is 1.6 foot tall and 6.8 foot long.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 04, 2013, 07:44:04 PM
Damn, misread  :laugh: Still, uh, FEATHERS!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Apr 04, 2013, 07:45:00 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 04, 2013, 07:41:08 PM
There is NO WAY 6 foot tall, 9 foot long animal weighs 30 pounds :laugh:

The actual weight of a Deinonychus is 160lbs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 04, 2013, 07:45:40 PM
Dont bring reality into this, Cvalda!

Although i've seen some badass designs of dinos with feathers :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 04, 2013, 07:46:42 PM
Dem six foot turkeys :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 04, 2013, 07:49:55 PM
But imagine yourself in the cretaceous period

and that six foot turkey is staring down at you from the other side of a ridge...  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 04, 2013, 07:50:53 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F0.tqn.com%2Fd%2Fdinosaurs%2F1%2F0%2Fe%2FB%2F-%2F-%2FvelociraptorAB.jpg&hash=9744c5c32b40416089d423c69058b27707b543da)
RAWR!!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 04, 2013, 07:56:35 PM
They were probably more stylish than that.  :laugh:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fkokocast.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F08%2FDinoAliens.jpg&hash=0c61182e219e0dd19c089bf0811410beb7a4b9de)

and here's an interesting book on dinos and the stereotypes we have of them
http://io9.com/5965389/a-book-that-will-make-you-question-everything-you-know-about-dinosaurs (http://io9.com/5965389/a-book-that-will-make-you-question-everything-you-know-about-dinosaurs)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Apr 04, 2013, 08:26:59 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Apr 04, 2013, 05:12:03 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 04, 2013, 04:26:42 PM
JURASSIC PARK 4 Will Make You "Want To Keep The Lights On" Says Paleontologist

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=76991#OIzvCxGxTCh3QQGH.99  (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=76991#OIzvCxGxTCh3QQGH.99)

I'm hoping for TLW novel style Carnotaurus, or JP the Game style Troodon. Preferably both.

This.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 04, 2013, 08:44:22 PM
I'd like to see a new raptor breed in this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 04, 2013, 08:50:34 PM
Carnotaurus.
Deinonychus.
Baryonix.

Not dinosaurs but still awesome:
Kronosaurus and
Dimetro-madafaking-don.

lol


Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 04, 2013, 08:51:43 PM
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/3077280/#.UV3ANzewXTo (http://www.nbcnews.com/id/3077280/#.UV3ANzewXTo)

A paleontologist's take on JP 3 from 2001. Worth a read and frankly, I like his idea about JP IV taking an eco-conscious turn.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 04, 2013, 09:27:07 PM
lol basically the conversation we just had

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Nu6e9UMtAiE (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nu6e9UMtAiE#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Apr 04, 2013, 09:53:15 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zvqGDfdfmM# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zvqGDfdfmM#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 04, 2013, 09:56:58 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Apr 04, 2013, 09:27:07 PM
lol basically the conversation we just had

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Nu6e9UMtAiE (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nu6e9UMtAiE#ws)

These guys sound like a bunch of morons.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 05, 2013, 12:50:50 AM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Apr 04, 2013, 09:53:15 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zvqGDfdfmM# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zvqGDfdfmM#)

Awesome.  A little too jumbled, but it was funny.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 05, 2013, 03:01:23 AM
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc6/8401_538762002835354_914638763_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 05, 2013, 03:23:39 AM
That scene always made me wonder what kind of security force they had for the T.Rex. The military maybe?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Apr 05, 2013, 03:29:19 AM
Likely just the same dudes with heavier weaponry. You can't have the government-run military on-call for a T-rex on a far away island.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 05, 2013, 03:29:50 AM
Didn't they have rocket launchers of some kind in the book?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 05, 2013, 03:31:13 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Apr 05, 2013, 03:01:23 AM
(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc6/8401_538762002835354_914638763_n.jpg)

Bob Peck was just amazing in that role. Ugh, rest in peace buddy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Apr 05, 2013, 03:31:34 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Apr 05, 2013, 03:29:19 AM
Likely just the same dudes with heavier weaponry. You can't have the government-run military on-call for a T-rex on a far away island.

Yet they are for shoveling our prime minister's driveway when the snow comes?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Apr 05, 2013, 03:32:01 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Apr 05, 2013, 03:29:50 AM
Didn't they have rocket launchers of some kind in the book?
Yup. Muldoon even had an RPG.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 05, 2013, 03:41:20 AM
What with all the hype about remakes, does anyone ever wonder if they'll remake Jurassic Park; this time with a closer tie to the book?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 05, 2013, 03:42:49 AM
I'm sure it'll happen eventually. Not for the next few years, though, with a sequel on the way.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 05, 2013, 04:40:14 AM
Jurassic Park 3D was the shit!  Loved it for the 150th time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Apr 05, 2013, 04:50:25 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Apr 05, 2013, 03:41:20 AM
What with all the hype about remakes, does anyone ever wonder if they'll remake Jurassic Park; this time with a closer tie to the book?
I'd say it's likely, about 20 years down the road... but its goal certainly won't be to make it more similar to the book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 05, 2013, 05:47:33 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Apr 05, 2013, 03:29:19 AM
Likely just the same dudes with heavier weaponry. You can't have the government-run military on-call for a T-rex on a far away island.

Haha yeah, I was only kidding.

As for Bob Peck...I didn't know he was dead. f**king tragic, he was a good actor.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 05, 2013, 08:30:01 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 04, 2013, 04:26:42 PM
JURASSIC PARK 4 Will Make You "Want To Keep The Lights On" Says Paleontologist

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=76991#OIzvCxGxTCh3QQGH.99  (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=76991#OIzvCxGxTCh3QQGH.99)

Prehistoric insects?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Apr 05, 2013, 08:40:19 AM
Anyone know what year the new JP film be set?

and does Sam Neill "Dr. Alan Grant" make appearance again ?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Apr 05, 2013, 10:45:35 AM
nope
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Apr 05, 2013, 11:08:03 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Apr 05, 2013, 10:45:35 AM
nope

thanks.

and awesome signature btw :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Apr 05, 2013, 12:10:25 PM
:3
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Apr 05, 2013, 01:38:37 PM
Quote from: predxeno on Apr 05, 2013, 03:41:20 AM
What with all the hype about remakes, does anyone ever wonder if they'll remake Jurassic Park; this time with a closer tie to the book?

I hope not. Some movies are meant to never be remade. I think Hollywood is smart enough to know a movie such as Jurassic Park is untouchable as it is a truly landmark iconic film for the ages.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Apr 05, 2013, 04:25:16 PM
I'll be off to Silver City (theatre) to see Jurassic Park 3D tonight.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 05, 2013, 04:55:06 PM
If they remake JP closer to the book, I want Peter Dinklage for asshole Hammond.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Apr 05, 2013, 04:56:06 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Apr 05, 2013, 04:55:06 PM
If they remake JP closer to the book, I want Peter Dinklage for asshole Hammond.

I don't think he would be the right man for the role. Max von Sydow is who I would cast.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 05, 2013, 05:16:22 PM
Nah, Guy Pearce in make-up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 05, 2013, 05:51:26 PM
ONLY 5.5 MORE HOURS, I CAN'T WAIT ANYMORE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Apr 05, 2013, 06:49:24 PM
Just got out of the theater a couple minutes ago. I can't believe how much I liked the 3D conversion. As someone that usually despises 3D, I didn't get a headache or find it obnoxious in the slightest. They really used it intelligently.

As for the movie, It's still my long time favorite, and seeing it in Imax was worth every penny. Was holding my breath without realizing it during the first scene with the Tyrannosaur, and everything looked so crisp. The sound was almost the best part. The Tyrannosaur roar was deafening.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 06, 2013, 12:23:39 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwdvVwVuOI0# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwdvVwVuOI0#)  :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Apr 06, 2013, 12:49:04 AM
Lacking in awe...?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 06, 2013, 01:15:22 AM
"Sam Neil and Laura Dern play archaeologists.." *facepalm*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The One and Only on Apr 06, 2013, 01:26:29 AM
I'll always remember the review he gave on one show about Steven Speilberg's Saving Private Ryan Ebert talked about enjoying the director's World War 2 flick, and commented, "How nice it was for Speilberg to direct a real movie, and not another Jurassic Park."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Apr 06, 2013, 02:21:15 AM
oh dear.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 06, 2013, 02:42:27 AM
Just came back from seeing JP3D again with the family this time. Enjoyed it even more.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Apr 06, 2013, 03:58:53 AM
The 3D made it feel 'larger than life' and in the good way. It was as if you really were there, sometimes. I was immersed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Apr 06, 2013, 04:04:02 AM
I never really considered Roger Ebert a reliable reviewer.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 06, 2013, 04:20:32 AM
This wasn't a film. It was a f**king experience. I laughed, I cried, I jumped. At the risk of sounding over-zealous, this film has used 3D in the best way I've seen in a really long time (or at least since Dredd 3D). The conversion was absolutely flawless.

Thank you Universal, for re-introducing this timeless gem to moviegoers :')
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 06, 2013, 05:31:14 AM
GodDAMMIT all this enthusiasm, and I am getting it later, damn my distributors to Hell.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 06, 2013, 05:43:14 AM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/59740_10100415188372691_2056421540_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 06, 2013, 08:13:52 AM
Why do I have to wait until AUGUST! >:(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 06, 2013, 08:21:25 AM
There isnt a Portugal release date so far....

THERE ISNT A PORTUGAL RELEASE DATE SO FAR.

>:(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Apr 06, 2013, 08:31:33 AM
Just got back, and my thoughts are...

Quote from: Space Sweeper on Apr 06, 2013, 08:28:16 AM
Jurassic Park 3D

I really can say that, without looking through rose-tinted Nostalgia Edition glasses (3D ones, actually), that this is just one of the best made movies in existence. Just... a goddamn masterpiece in just about every regard with memorable characters and performances and a level of science fiction-based metaphysical discussions that seem to deepen every time I watch it, along with my appreciation for the film... and don't even get me started on the visual effects-- flawless. This big screen watch wasn't just a mind-blowing nostalgia trip, but a watch that would further my appreciation for the film onto a whole new tier; and that's saying a lot considering it positively lead my childhood and fantasies, even forming me as a person as few films can manage.

I'm not even sure what else to say aside from the fact that the 3D post-conversion is a flawless and non-flashy presentation that adds a wonderful window-like level of depth to the movie. The scene where Grant, Ellie, and the rest first encounter the Brachiosaurus send shivers down my spine and chilled my forearms... the reactions from the actors really grabbed me this time; Grant's dizzied disbelief, Ellie's awe, and Hammond's pride were all played beautifully-- even the critical Malcolm can't help but smile and chuckle in bewildered amusement. That's how you sell seeing a creature of extraordinary grace and size that has been extinct for 65 million years. When the score reached that peak as Grant looked out over the valley after Hammond's famous "Welcome to Jurassic Park!", I was nearly in tears. And it didn't stop there, the T-rex Paddock attack scene had my breathless the entire time and smiling like an idiot by the end; I can't imagine I found the time to blink.

I wish I could go on and on about this, but I've gotta find a stopping point somewhere; we've all seen and love the movie. I plead everybody to see this while it lasts in theaters. I rarely use the word "treat" as a descriptive term for a film, but that's exactly what this experience was.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 06, 2013, 09:16:01 AM
So much love for JP out there at the moment. ;D still can't believe we're getting a 4th as well. *drools*

UPDATE: My Jurassic Park laserdisc arrived this morning! This thing is huge with a cool DNA poster and two booklets about the film and dinosaurs. I'm still waiting on TLW laserdisc to arrive and I'll need to buy a "Discovision" player to watch them but boy is this a rare gem to add to my collection 8)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi48.tinypic.com%2F2n9cg34.jpg&hash=0b382744c65b98d5dcdeb7b92e539be62c2c869b)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 06, 2013, 05:42:29 PM
f**king A! How much did that run you, if I may ask?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Apr 06, 2013, 06:11:06 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Apr 06, 2013, 08:31:33 AM
Just got back, and my thoughts are...

Quote from: Space Sweeper on Apr 06, 2013, 08:28:16 AM
Jurassic Park 3D

I really can say that, without looking through rose-tinted Nostalgia Edition glasses (3D ones, actually), that this is just one of the best made movies in existence. Just... a goddamn masterpiece in just about every regard with memorable characters and performances and a level of science fiction-based metaphysical discussions that seem to deepen every time I watch it, along with my appreciation for the film... and don't even get me started on the visual effects-- flawless. This big screen watch wasn't just a mind-blowing nostalgia trip, but a watch that would further my appreciation for the film onto a whole new tier; and that's saying a lot considering it positively lead my childhood and fantasies, even forming me as a person as few films can manage.

I'm not even sure what else to say aside from the fact that the 3D post-conversion is a flawless and non-flashy presentation that adds a wonderful window-like level of depth to the movie. The scene where Grant, Ellie, and the rest first encounter the Brachiosaurus send shivers down my spine and chilled my forearms... the reactions from the actors really grabbed me this time; Grant's dizzied disbelief, Ellie's awe, and Hammond's pride were all played beautifully-- even the critical Malcolm can't help but smile and chuckle in bewildered amusement. That's how you sell seeing a creature of extraordinary grace and size that has been extinct for 65 million years. When the score reached that peak as Grant looked out over the valley after Hammond's famous "Welcome to Jurassic Park!", I was nearly in tears. And it didn't stop there, the T-rex Paddock attack scene had my breathless the entire time and smiling like an idiot by the end; I can't imagine I found the time to blink.

I wish I could go on and on about this, but I've gotta find a stopping point somewhere; we've all seen and love the movie. I plead everybody to see this while it lasts in theaters. I rarely use the word "treat" as a descriptive term for a film, but that's exactly what this experience was.

Glad you liked it. This first "big screen" and 3D experience really takes me back.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 06, 2013, 06:21:20 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 06, 2013, 05:42:29 PM
f**king A! How much did that run you, if I may ask?

£30 and TLW was £8!

Apparently what you see of the film on laserdisc is more than what was on VHS, DVD, ad Blu-ray. Lookie lookie...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.avsforum.com%2Fc%2Fc4%2Fc48c95be_vbattach229861.jpeg&hash=eff972a145e4f49bd5a17626c448bd2e61ca0341)

And some laserdiscs are known for having rare cuts of the movie, like E.T for example has a cameo of Harrison Ford. I don't think JP has anything different though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Apr 06, 2013, 06:29:50 PM
I suspect the LaserDisc was opened up slightly to a 1.78:1 aspect ratio, while the Blu-ray retains its orginally intended cinematic 1.85:1 dimensions.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Eva on Apr 06, 2013, 07:39:18 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 06, 2013, 09:16:01 AM
So much love for JP out there at the moment. ;D still can't believe we're getting a 4th as well. *drools*

UPDATE: My Jurassic Park laserdisc arrived this morning! This thing is huge with a cool DNA poster and two booklets about the film and dinosaurs. I'm still waiting on TLW laserdisc to arrive and I'll need to buy a "Discovision" player to watch them but boy is this a rare gem to add to my collection 8)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi48.tinypic.com%2F2n9cg34.jpg&hash=0b382744c65b98d5dcdeb7b92e539be62c2c869b)

That's pretty cool as a collectible, but you'd be better off buying the film on blu-ray instead of a laser-disc player and watch that version instead... unless you have a laser-disc collection, of course. 1080p >>> 480i/p ;)

Nostalgia is a bitch.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 06, 2013, 07:46:18 PM
I have it on Blu-ray as well. ;)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 06, 2013, 10:51:13 PM
I just saw this today and WOW, it was like watching the film for the first time again; the digital and sound restoration were amazing, I wish they put this kinda effort into the Blu-Ray. :'(  A first-time viewer was also in my theatre so I was able to laugh to myself as that person jumped at every scare in this beloved classic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 06, 2013, 11:25:02 PM
Saw this today. What can I say about the actual movie that hasn't been said? We all know the film itself is amazing, with effects that (mostly) still hold up, especially the raptors. The characters are all rather memorable in their own ways, and the set pieces are all excellent. The dialogue is great, and the T. rex is f**king scary on the big screen. The 3D conversion is actually pretty good, giving some nice depth of field to the shots. Only real complaint is that Hammond popped out of the screen more than the dinos, lol.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 07, 2013, 01:46:53 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Apr 06, 2013, 11:25:02 PMOnly real complaint is that Hammond popped out of the screen more than the dinos, lol.

Yeah....

Spoiler
Kinda wish the raptor that pops out from behind Ellie in the maintence shed came a little bit closer to the audience.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 07, 2013, 01:54:23 AM
Saw it in 2D today, my second time seeing it in a cinema in as many years. Looked a little DNR-y compared to the 2011 digital cinema version :-\

Things I learned from Jurassic Park:

-- When executing a fragrantly illegal, high-risk corporate heist, don't bother to cover your tracks. In fact, make it as blatantly obvious as possible and leave a clearly marked trail of evidence linking you to the crime: a taunting hacker screen, a complete shut down of the island. Hell, when stealing the priceless dinosaur embryos, don't bother to replace them with dummy capsules -- you want them to obviously have been stolen. After all, your ultimate goal is to get sent to prison and have an investigation launched against your new corporate benefactor as soon as possible.

-- A Tyrannosaurus has just broken through a fence and is hunting right next to the car you are otherwise safely protected in. The obvious thing to do is to dig through the car for no reason, find a high-powered flashlight, turn it on, and then wave it around crazily to attract the dinosaur. When it comes over to investigate, shine the light directly into its eyeball. Then, when you can't turn it off (but could turn it on?), don't just put it under the seat or something, make sure you wave it around some more so that a tense attack sequence can occur.

-- T-Rex's visual sense is based on movement. Don't ask questions, Dr. Grant said it so obviously it's true. Not only that, though, but their sense of smell is also probably based on movement, too, because they can get so close to you that their breath can knock your hat off without them detecting your presence.

-- But don't think that T-Rex is completely lame just yet -- he can fly. Or at least levitate, considering his pen is actually a deep, abyssal drop as far as the eye can see in both directions. Raptors can also levitate -- one proudly shoves its head up through a ten foot ceiling grate as our characters kick away at it, but has to take a flying leap after its fallen just to miss a leg dangling above it.

-- After you have plummeted down that drop where the T-Rex magically tore his way through, do not stay put -- that would be the sane, rational thing to do. After all, Laura Dern and that hunter guy are on their way to rescue you. No, go for a midnight stroll through the dinosaur infested woods and put yourself both in harms way and out of reach of rescue.

-- If you are a thirteen year old girl who is also a hacker, conveniently state this fact in the most awkwardly transparent way possible to telegraph to the audience that your skills will come in handy later.

-- When engineering dinosaurs so that they are all females and don't breed, do not bother to look into the very specific species of sex changing amphibian you use to fill the gene sequence gaps.

-- When outfitting the security for your dinosaur-surrounded compound on an island prone to hurricanes and power outages, make sure all your door locks are electric, and under no condition should you allow for manual locking. That would be practical.

-- When a velociraptor is trying to get through the door to eat you, and your thirteen year old hacker sister is navigating a ludicrous computer interface that controls the whole park with relative speed and ease, you should just dance around with your hands on your head. Laura Dern is over in the corner trying to reach a gun -- DO NOT HELP HER. She won't think to ask anyway.

But then again, as Laura Dern herself says in the film, "You can't think through this one. You have to feel it." Yes, this is a typical David Koepp Idiot Plot, but it's directed with so much muscular craftsmanship and is filled with such wonderful performances, all capped with a magisterial John Williams score, that you don't really care. The visual effects, barring the CGI brachiosaur scenes, have aged beautifully, and Stan Winston's animatronics are so real you don't even bother to roll your eyes over the shocking paleontological research failures. The best scene in the film is still one of its most simple: the group comes across a sick triceratops lying in a field, and Sam Neill rests his head on her heaving flank in absolute wonder.

8/10
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 07, 2013, 01:56:14 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 07, 2013, 01:46:53 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Apr 06, 2013, 11:25:02 PMOnly real complaint is that Hammond popped out of the screen more than the dinos, lol.

Yeah....

Spoiler
Kinda wish the raptor that pops out from behind Ellie in the maintence shed came a little bit closer to the audience.
[close]

Spoiler
The first-time viewer in my audience jumped out of her seat to her boyfriend's when that happened. ;D :laugh:
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 07, 2013, 02:05:02 AM
What I learned from Jurassic Park:

-If you're building a potentially dangerous theme park/zoo, never, ever hire Newman as one of your main computer guys.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Apr 07, 2013, 02:07:19 AM
Don't get cheap on me Dodgson
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 07, 2013, 02:37:18 AM
Dodgson, we've got Dodgson here!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 07, 2013, 05:52:58 AM
I really wish they'd expanded on that in the film. In the book, there's a very detailed account of why Nedry goes rogue but in the film it just seems like he's angry for no real reason.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 07, 2013, 05:55:41 AM
Yeah, he's just a greedy bitch in the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ShadowPred on Apr 07, 2013, 06:10:44 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Apr 07, 2013, 05:55:41 AM
Yeah, he's just a greedy bitch in the movie.

That was easily understand by me when I saw it in theaters back in 1993. Didn't need any other reason for him to go rogue other than that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 07, 2013, 06:46:29 AM
There's a line he says, "Don't get cheap on me Dodgson. That was Hammond's mistake." The implication is that he feels cheated but we're never told why. It kinda does matter.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ShadowPred on Apr 07, 2013, 06:48:37 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 07, 2013, 06:46:29 AM
There's a line he says, "Don't get cheap on me Dodgson. That was Hammond's mistake." The implication is that he feels cheated but we're never told why. It kinda does matter.


I don't see how, him selling the f**king stuff for money is really all you need for him to go rogue. If you're gonna make a shit ton of money, who in the hell cares what happens to the employer that is being screwed over?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Apr 07, 2013, 07:15:13 AM
I was busy this weekend. So I hope to see Jurassic Park 3D next week.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 07, 2013, 08:48:14 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 07, 2013, 05:52:58 AM
I really wish they'd expanded on that in the film. In the book, there's a very detailed account of why Nedry goes rogue but in the film it just seems like he's angry for no real reason.
We also have the brief back and forth between him and Hammond later on.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Apr 07, 2013, 09:29:17 AM
He considered himself underpaid for the services rendered, and therefore when he was contacted by Dodgson to steal the embryos for a f**kton of money, he said yes. It was probably enough to ensure an early retirement.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 07, 2013, 02:35:47 PM
From The Memoirs of John Parker Hammond...

"Dennis Nedry I found in Cambridge, and despite his idiosyncrasies, he was years ahead of his competition. Dennis fancied himself quite the hacker; he had his own locks for his doors. His office decorations were quite outside company regulations."

"It was 3 A.M. The room was strewn with soda cans, and for the hundredth time we ran the extraction sequence. As Nedry typed, the world seemed to hold its breath, and for a moment we stood at the turning point between two great planetary eras: the million-year reign of man, and the age of the dinosaurs. "Dennis? What are we looking at here?" All my life I waited for something great, something extraordinary. And then... it opened up. The code read true."

"In 1989, the park was nearly complete. Our investors demanded on-site approval and I, idiotically as it now turned out, believed we were ready. The debacle of August 27, 1989 is now quite well known, and the legal consequences were, as you may well imagine, rather extensive. I still believe Nedry left himself a back door, something about the hobbits or god knows what."

From Jurassic Park - "I am totally unappreciated in my time."

Nedry obviously turned to a rival company because he felt as if he was the real miracle worker. However he saw money as a show of appreciation.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 07, 2013, 03:23:48 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Apr 07, 2013, 08:48:14 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 07, 2013, 05:52:58 AM
I really wish they'd expanded on that in the film. In the book, there's a very detailed account of why Nedry goes rogue but in the film it just seems like he's angry for no real reason.
We also have the brief back and forth between him and Hammond later on.

Indeed, but it still wasn't as much as I would've liked personally. That's just me.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 07, 2013, 03:56:49 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 07, 2013, 06:46:29 AM
There's a line he says, "Don't get cheap on me Dodgson. That was Hammond's mistake." The implication is that he feels cheated but we're never told why. It kinda does matter.

Really?  In the US, we never got the "That was Hammond's mistake," part.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 07, 2013, 03:58:02 PM
Bizarre. It is right before the film cuts to the flying chopper.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 07, 2013, 04:04:48 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdhYZvNcNRk#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdhYZvNcNRk#ws)

It's there and honestly I never realized that is what he said; it is very muffled
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 07, 2013, 04:35:55 PM
I have seen this movie so many times and I have never noticed that; I'll have to check again.  Also, does anyone know how I can get the youtube player to play on AvPGalaxy?  All I get is a blank screen (although I still get sound) and I have to follow the link to make it work properly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 07, 2013, 04:36:21 PM
Standard if you are on iPod or iPad.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 07, 2013, 04:58:00 PM
I'm on a laptop, interestingly enough; I think I'm supposed to install some kind of add-on or something, but I don't know what. ???
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 07, 2013, 06:43:51 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Apr 07, 2013, 04:04:48 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdhYZvNcNRk#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdhYZvNcNRk#ws)

It's there and honestly I never realized that is what he said; it is very muffled

I've always wondered why he finds the can so funny.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Apr 07, 2013, 07:06:50 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-w-58hQ9dLk (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-w-58hQ9dLk)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 07, 2013, 07:08:44 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 07, 2013, 06:43:51 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Apr 07, 2013, 04:04:48 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdhYZvNcNRk#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdhYZvNcNRk#ws)

It's there and honestly I never realized that is what he said; it is very muffled

I've always wondered why he finds the can so funny.

Just amazed at how simplistic yet concealed design.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 07, 2013, 11:17:27 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 07, 2013, 06:43:51 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Apr 07, 2013, 04:04:48 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdhYZvNcNRk#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdhYZvNcNRk#ws)

It's there and honestly I never realized that is what he said; it is very muffled

I've always wondered why he finds the can so funny.

He's the living image of an immature kid, and babies think everything is funny. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Apr 08, 2013, 12:29:30 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 07, 2013, 06:46:29 AM"Don't get cheap on me Dodgson. That was Hammond's mistake."

I forgot how menacingly he delivered those lines. You almost don't need anymore backstory.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 08, 2013, 01:12:26 AM
Does anyone know if they're planning The Lost World: Jurassic Park 3D and a Jurassic Park 3-D as well?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 08, 2013, 01:15:24 AM
If they do, I won't be seeing them. The characters (Roland excepted) in TLW are unlikeable enough on the small screen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 08, 2013, 01:16:47 AM
But think how totes awesome the gymnastics scene would look in 3D! :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 08, 2013, 01:19:01 AM
lol. Between that and the Spinosaurus shitting out a phone in JP3... and the dude saving a kid in the Pteranodon nest... :P

has this franchise jumped the shark? :P

At least the JP4 Dinosoldiers script had no equivalent scene. lol. (and actually had likeable characters in Nick and Maya) :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 08, 2013, 01:23:21 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 08, 2013, 01:16:47 AM
But think how totes awesome the gymnastics scene would look in 3D! :o

The only conceivable reason for me to go see one for TLW would be for Postlethwaite's awesomeness in 3D . But I can just pirate the damn thing at home and skip ahead to his scenes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 08, 2013, 01:25:40 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 08, 2013, 01:19:01 AM
has this franchise jumped the shark? :P
Yeah, about 16 years ago :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 08, 2013, 01:26:52 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Apr 08, 2013, 01:12:26 AM
Does anyone know if they're planning The Lost World: Jurassic Park 3D and a Jurassic Park 3-D as well?

I doubt it very much. Neither film has a particularly large following though I'd see TLW for sure. I really liked it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 08, 2013, 01:27:22 AM
Yep. Roland should have been the main character in that flick. :P

Love his deleted scene. :) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMIfTvbqu6o#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMIfTvbqu6o#ws)

Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 08, 2013, 01:25:40 AM
Yeah, about 16 years ago :P

One could say it "kicked the velociraptor". :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Sso02V on Apr 08, 2013, 01:27:45 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Apr 07, 2013, 04:04:48 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdhYZvNcNRk#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdhYZvNcNRk#ws)

It's there and honestly I never realized that is what he said; it is very muffled
I heard so much that I either missed or forgot that I heard. It's amazing how 20 years of home viewing can erase memories from the theater.

There were little sounds and musical cues and background tracks that I didn't remember after all this time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Apr 08, 2013, 01:09:27 PM
BK Jurassic Park toys leak:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi170.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fu278%2Fgrincha%2FScreenshot_2013-04-06-07-43-53-1_zps2d6649a4.png&hash=8578aef58c905137589202dfb609091af230c116)

Quote
1. Dinosaur Sketch Creator (etching toy)
2. Jurassic Park Jeep
3. 3D Poster with night vision 3D glasses
4. Raptor Egg
5. T-Rex Bone Puzzle
6. Tri-Top Bone Puzzle
7. Mosquito Amber Light up
8. Jurassic Park Journal
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 08, 2013, 02:54:09 PM
Nostalgic!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 08, 2013, 04:11:04 PM
I saw JP in 3d, and thought it was absolutely glorious! I'm not a big fan of 3d, but it was actually implemented nicely.

I'm only 23, but I felt old hearing all the little teenagers who had never seen the movie. I wanted to slap some of them...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 08, 2013, 04:21:56 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Apr 08, 2013, 01:09:27 PM
BK Jurassic Park toys leak:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi170.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fu278%2Fgrincha%2FScreenshot_2013-04-06-07-43-53-1_zps2d6649a4.png&hash=8578aef58c905137589202dfb609091af230c116)

Quote
1. Dinosaur Sketch Creator (etching toy)
2. Jurassic Park Jeep
3. 3D Poster with night vision 3D glasses
4. Raptor Egg
5. T-Rex Bone Puzzle
6. Tri-Top Bone Puzzle
7. Mosquito Amber Light up
8. Jurassic Park Journal

Any word on a release date?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Apr 08, 2013, 10:21:32 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 08, 2013, 04:21:56 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Apr 08, 2013, 01:09:27 PM
BK Jurassic Park toys leak:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi170.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fu278%2Fgrincha%2FScreenshot_2013-04-06-07-43-53-1_zps2d6649a4.png&hash=8578aef58c905137589202dfb609091af230c116)

Quote
1. Dinosaur Sketch Creator (etching toy)
2. Jurassic Park Jeep
3. 3D Poster with night vision 3D glasses
4. Raptor Egg
5. T-Rex Bone Puzzle
6. Tri-Top Bone Puzzle
7. Mosquito Amber Light up
8. Jurassic Park Journal

Any word on a release date?

Nope, not yet. Most likely come out this week or next week.

Today in class, our professor's marker was squeaking, and it made the sound of the Dilophosaurus. Freaked the hell outta me.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 08, 2013, 11:35:41 PM
I thought BK movie toys usually come out before the films release  ???
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Apr 08, 2013, 11:44:35 PM
Just got back from seeing the 3D version.


I... I can't...

I've never seen an example of 3D I disliked, but even then... It was just...


It was mindblowing, is the best way I can describe it.

The scenes with the Tyrannosaurus.. Just...


Yes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Apr 08, 2013, 11:47:16 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 08, 2013, 11:35:41 PM
I thought BK movie toys usually come out before the films release  ???

I did too, but they're not at my local BK yet.  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Invader on Apr 09, 2013, 05:11:07 AM
Just saw this, didn't really care for the 3D, just wanted to see this movie on the big screen (or in my case small screen, because my town was only showing this movie in 1 theater with a small screen). Anyways it was great as always 10/10.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 09, 2013, 06:27:29 PM
Bummer.  As long as you still enjoyed it!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Apr 10, 2013, 02:52:23 AM
(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/485392_556847561016818_1516053100_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Apr 10, 2013, 03:03:08 AM
GAAAHD...I WANNA SEE JP3D...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 10, 2013, 12:31:16 PM
......You are never gonna hear the Raptors the same way after reading this article:

Spoiler
Seriously fellas... there's no turning back
Spoiler
http://www.tor.com/blogs/2013/04/morning-roundup-jurassic-park-dino-sounds-are-really-tortoises-having-sex
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 10, 2013, 01:37:11 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 10, 2013, 12:31:16 PM
......You are never gonna hear the Raptors the same way after reading this article:

Spoiler
Seriously fellas... there's no turning back
Spoiler
http://www.tor.com/blogs/2013/04/morning-roundup-jurassic-park-dino-sounds-are-really-tortoises-having-sex
[close]
[close]

Excellent. (https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Frumbles.fr.yuku.com%2Fdomain%2Fbypass%2Fimages%2Fcool02.gif&hash=e9e23a157ad7f6f2a793aff5867f5bd505516828)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 10, 2013, 04:15:44 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 10, 2013, 12:31:16 PM
......You are never gonna hear the Raptors the same way after reading this article:

Spoiler
Seriously fellas... there's no turning back
Spoiler
http://www.tor.com/blogs/2013/04/morning-roundup-jurassic-park-dino-sounds-are-really-tortoises-having-sex
[close]
[close]

Haha.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Apr 10, 2013, 05:37:09 PM
I need to figure out why I never fell in love with this movie. ???
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 10, 2013, 05:39:01 PM
You saw through its myriad of plot holes and inanities?

-or-

You were never a child?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 10, 2013, 05:40:07 PM
Quote from: TJ Doc on Apr 10, 2013, 05:37:09 PM
I need to figure out why I never fell in love with this movie. ???

Because it's not They Live?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Apr 10, 2013, 05:45:46 PM
I will ignore that.

Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 10, 2013, 05:39:01 PM
You saw through its myriad of plot holes and inanities?

-or-

You were never a child?

The logical whoopsies didn't bother me until I was older (but now they are pretty distracting), and I think I was a child.

I was always more of a Star Wars kid, but even so, I first saw JP at a very young age... There's no discernible reason why my underwear doesn't automatically moisten at the mere mention of animatronic dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 10, 2013, 05:47:11 PM
Quote from: TJ Doc on Apr 10, 2013, 05:45:46 PM
I was always more of a Star Wars kid, but even so, I first saw JP at a very young age... There's no discernible reason why my underwear doesn't automatically moisten at the mere mention of animatronic dinosaurs.
...


...


...

The truth is revealed: TJ Doc is an alien in disguise! >:(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Apr 10, 2013, 06:14:46 PM
When this re-release comes to UK cinemas in August, I'll do my best to see it.

Maybe then it will enkindle the childlike nostalgia that never was...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 10, 2013, 06:15:30 PM
You didn't see it when it was rereleased in the UK in fall 2011? :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Apr 10, 2013, 06:19:20 PM
I was scrotum deep in final year university work then, so no, I sadly missed that boat.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 10, 2013, 06:23:25 PM
Quote from: TJ Doc on Apr 10, 2013, 06:19:20 PM
I sadly missed that boat.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimageshack.us%2Fscaled%2Flanding%2F16%2Feastsigncrashed.png&hash=53f0ef85ce99d9f931e1383db9e71b8b8a24a37e)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Apr 10, 2013, 06:28:39 PM
Goddamn it, Wayne.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 10, 2013, 06:45:30 PM
Quote from: TJ Doc on Apr 10, 2013, 05:45:46 PMI was always more of a Star Wars kid, but even so, I first saw JP at a very young age... There's no discernible reason why my underwear doesn't automatically moisten at the mere mention of animatronic dinosaurs.

Other way round here. I never got into Star Wars' original trilogy as a youngster even when it was re-released in the cinema, it took Jedi Knight and KOTOR to pique my interest. Still not a particular fan of the older films.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 10, 2013, 06:46:34 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 10, 2013, 12:31:16 PM
......You are never gonna hear the Raptors the same way after reading this article:

Spoiler
Seriously fellas... there's no turning back
Spoiler
http://www.tor.com/blogs/2013/04/morning-roundup-jurassic-park-dino-sounds-are-really-tortoises-having-sex
[close]
[close]

Well that's interesting. Tortoises are certainly frisky.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 10, 2013, 06:47:16 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Apr 10, 2013, 06:45:30 PM
Still not a particular fan of the older films.
...are you implying you are more a fan of the Prequel films?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 10, 2013, 09:24:03 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 10, 2013, 06:47:16 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Apr 10, 2013, 06:45:30 PM
Still not a particular fan of the older films.
...are you implying you are more a fan of the Prequel films?

Totes (toats?). Well, maybe not Phantom Menace outside the lightsaber showdown.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 12, 2013, 05:17:48 AM
This reduced me to tears 8)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMZYUEMkGmo#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMZYUEMkGmo#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 12, 2013, 08:14:48 PM
lol, look at what the JP FB page just posted

(https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/547320_541602489217972_2070526496_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 12, 2013, 11:50:20 PM
I'm psychic.

So I saw the movie again earlier tonight and I was wondering. If Isla Sorna was supposed to be the island where the dinosaurs were "free range" and bred at will, why was inGen hatching eggs on Isla Nublar in the lab? I mean, I figure with Site B they would let the dinosaurs grow to full-size then bring them to Site A when they were ready. But why hatch babies on the mainland if you have Site B for just that reason?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 12, 2013, 11:52:23 PM
Because Isla Sorna is an ass pull made up to justify a sequel? :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 12, 2013, 11:54:47 PM
Well...yeah...

God dammit!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Apr 13, 2013, 12:01:03 AM
Technichally, Isla Sorna was more of a "testing grounds" sort of thing.

The dinosaurs created on that island were prototypes, to make sure the DNA shit they were doing worked, and that they actually stayed alive during a normal lifecycle. Which is why there are dinosaurs found on Sorna that weren't on Nublar; They either weren't ready, or were too new in comparison to the event of the first movie to have been added to the park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 13, 2013, 12:09:47 AM
That makes perfect sense, thanks!

It also worked out logistically for the Site A crew. They can only fit so many dinosaurs on one island. I'm not sure they could have managed anymore than the ones they already had given the size of the island.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Apr 13, 2013, 12:11:48 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 12, 2013, 11:50:20 PM
I'm psychic.

So I saw the movie again earlier tonight and I was wondering. If Isla Sorna was supposed to be the island where the dinosaurs were "free range" and bred at will, why was inGen hatching eggs on Isla Nublar in the lab? I mean, I figure with Site B they would let the dinosaurs grow to full-size then bring them to Site A when they were ready. But why hatch babies on the mainland if you have Site B for just that reason?
For the tour. That and after the 1st incident with transporting the velociraptor, they probably didn't want to risk another breakout and moved raptor hatching to local.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 13, 2013, 12:16:36 AM
I don't think the tour was part of it in the sense that, despite Grant and the others going inside the genetics lab, general visitors wouldn't be able to do that. I think that was just an exception Hammond let slide because they were there for the first time. The transport scene bugs me to no end. If there was enough room for the Velociraptor to pull him in, surely someone could have simply walked inside the cage and shot the f**ker in the head.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 13, 2013, 12:29:46 AM
If you notice during that scene a whole bunch of crewmen are shooting it with rifles and tazers on both sides of the cage. How it didn't die right then and there, well that's just Spielberg being overly dramatic to heighten the scene. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 13, 2013, 12:30:57 AM
"They should all be destroyed."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 13, 2013, 12:41:25 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Apr 13, 2013, 12:29:46 AM
If you notice during that scene a whole bunch of crewmen are shooting it with rifles and tazers on both sides of the cage. How it didn't die right then and there, well that's just Spielberg being overly dramatic to heighten the scene. :P

Hm, I think only Muldoon had a shotgun. I didn't see anyone else with one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 13, 2013, 01:01:43 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimageshack.us%2Fscaled%2Flanding%2F441%2Fjurassicpark19931080phd.jpg&hash=8d1eb61e4482b8c85948e47a6fe7032f586706a1)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimageshack.us%2Fscaled%2Flanding%2F708%2Fjurassicpark19931080phd.jpg&hash=5b4d24baaba76becc70bc41fc78653ff7c6b30ab)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimageshack.us%2Fscaled%2Flanding%2F407%2Fjurassicpark19931080phdo.jpg&hash=cfcd433b81f9724a32338a7d07f2d8f7d7f4e2ce)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 13, 2013, 02:28:02 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 13, 2013, 12:16:36 AM
I don't think the tour was part of it in the sense that, despite Grant and the others going inside the genetics lab, general visitors wouldn't be able to do that. I think that was just an exception Hammond let slide because they were there for the first time. The transport scene bugs me to no end. If there was enough room for the Velociraptor to pull him in, surely someone could have simply walked inside the cage and shot the f**ker in the head.

Even with a shotgun I ain't walking inside that cage  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Apr 13, 2013, 02:38:05 AM
Just the one shotgun with Muldoon. A guard is sticking his M16 into the cage, but the others are stun guns.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Apr 13, 2013, 05:39:07 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Apr 13, 2013, 12:29:46 AM
If you notice during that scene a whole bunch of crewmen are shooting it with rifles and tazers on both sides of the cage. How it didn't die right then and there, well that's just Spielberg being overly dramatic to heighten the scene. :P
Quote from: First Blood on Apr 13, 2013, 01:01:43 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimageshack.us%2Fscaled%2Flanding%2F441%2Fjurassicpark19931080phd.jpg&hash=8d1eb61e4482b8c85948e47a6fe7032f586706a1)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimageshack.us%2Fscaled%2Flanding%2F708%2Fjurassicpark19931080phd.jpg&hash=5b4d24baaba76becc70bc41fc78653ff7c6b30ab)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimageshack.us%2Fscaled%2Flanding%2F407%2Fjurassicpark19931080phdo.jpg&hash=cfcd433b81f9724a32338a7d07f2d8f7d7f4e2ce)
But no one is really shooting at it, are they? They are hitting it with the tasers over and over again, but no shots are fired. The sad truth is probably that one of Hammond's dinosaurs was worth more to them alive than a Costa Rican worker.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 13, 2013, 06:26:34 AM
Yeah, they only started shooting at the very end, by then the raptor had the worker.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 13, 2013, 06:49:51 AM
Quote from: Shasvre on Apr 13, 2013, 05:39:07 AM
But no one is really shooting at it, are they? They are hitting it with the tasers over and over again, but no shots are fired. The sad truth is probably that one of Hammond's dinosaurs was worth more to them alive than a Costa Rican worker.

"Spared no expense!"

:P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 13, 2013, 09:07:36 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 13, 2013, 12:16:36 AM
I don't think the tour was part of it in the sense that, despite Grant and the others going inside the genetics lab, general visitors wouldn't be able to do that. I think that was just an exception Hammond let slide because they were there for the first time.

Crichton does explain it in TLW's book by saying that Nublar's cloning facility was a show for the tourists, and Sorna's production line was the real thing. It certainly wasn't written that way in the first book though...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 13, 2013, 02:09:12 PM
JPIV confirmed to begin shooting in July....

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=31#comments (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=31#comments)

Also, found this on SWS....

(https://fbcdn-photos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/s720x720/58584_514197165282622_1646202966_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Apr 13, 2013, 02:33:47 PM
WE MOSASAURUS NOW!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 13, 2013, 02:41:21 PM
They need to have a Carnotaurus or a Kronosaurus or the entire crew of this film can just quit and go home.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Apr 13, 2013, 02:46:29 PM
I agree.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 13, 2013, 05:08:32 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 13, 2013, 02:41:21 PM
They need to have a Carnotaurus or a Kronosaurus or the entire crew of this film can just quit and go home.

For what it's worth, there's a Kronosaurus in Jurassic Park: The Game. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 13, 2013, 07:14:09 PM
Hate to be a pedant (did I convince anyone there?) but it's a Tylosaurus in JP:TG. They look a little similar but they're from totally different lineages - Tylosaurus is a mosasaur, quite closely related to snakes. Kronosaurus is a pliosaur, they appeared at least 50 million years before the mosasaur tree diverged from the lizardy Squamata, and their ancestors diverged from basal reptiles another 50 before that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 13, 2013, 08:01:08 PM
Ah, my mistake then. :-[
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 13, 2013, 09:21:50 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 13, 2013, 02:09:12 PM
JPIV confirmed to begin shooting in July....

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=31#comments (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=31#comments)

Also, found this on SWS....

https://fbcdn-photos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/s720x720/58584_514197165282622_1646202966_n.jpg

Holy hell guess what my new desktop background is.

I think it's likely that we'll see some cloned aquatic monsters this time around.

Aquatic mosquitoes that got trapped in amber?  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 13, 2013, 09:26:00 PM
I'd like to see some of the early stages of dino cloning in a JP movie. Like all the f**k ups that happen before getting a proper dinosaur.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 13, 2013, 10:11:00 PM
There were some dinos in jars in JP3.. no f**kups though :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Apr 13, 2013, 10:14:41 PM
I'd like the next Jurassic Park film something akin to Prometheus.

An expedition travels to outer space and they find a strange asteroid containing an ecosystem filled with dinosaurs. Although everything seem to be alright, they find out there's an alien civilization that use the dinosaurs as weapons to conquer other planets, and they could be the responsible of the engineering of the Earth species.

It could be an epic trilogy including dinosaurs on UFOs attacking Earth.

Director: Ben Affleck

Cast:
Kristanna Loken - Dr. Christine Howard
Orlando Bloom - Dr. Edmund Rankin
Jake Glynenhall - Mr. David Graham, sponsor of the expedition
Daniel Davis - Clinton Arvor, European rich leader of an ufologist sect
Doug Jones - The aliens (several roles)

Working titles:
- Jurassic Planet
- Jurassic Army
- Jurassic Park - Conquest
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 13, 2013, 10:19:55 PM
Quote from: Magegg on Apr 13, 2013, 10:14:41 PM
I'd like the next Jurassic Park film something akin to Prometheus.

An expedition travels to outer space and they find a strange asteroid containing an ecosystem filled with dinosaurs. Although everything seem to be alright, they find out there's an alien civilization that use the dinosaurs as weapons to conquer other planets, and they could be the responsible of the engineering of the Earth species.

It could be an epic trilogy including dinosaurs on UFOs attacking Earth.

Director: Ben Affleck

Cast:
Kristanna Loken - Dr. Christine Howard
Orlando Bloom - Dr. Edmund Rankin
Jake Glynenhall - Mr. David Graham, sponsor of the expedition
Daniel Davis - Clinton Arvor, European rich leader of an ufologist sect
Doug Jones - The aliens (several roles)

Working titles:
- Jurassic Planet
- Jurassic Army
- Jurassic Park - Conquest

As long as it's not related to JP i'm all for it..
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Apr 13, 2013, 10:23:29 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Apr 13, 2013, 10:19:55 PM
Quote from: Magegg on Apr 13, 2013, 10:14:41 PM
I'd like the next Jurassic Park film something akin to Prometheus.

An expedition travels to outer space and they find a strange asteroid containing an ecosystem filled with dinosaurs. Although everything seem to be alright, they find out there's an alien civilization that use the dinosaurs as weapons to conquer other planets, and they could be the responsible of the engineering of the Earth species.

It could be an epic trilogy including dinosaurs on UFOs attacking Earth.

Director: Ben Affleck

Cast:
Kristanna Loken - Dr. Christine Howard
Orlando Bloom - Dr. Edmund Rankin
Jake Glynenhall - Mr. David Graham, sponsor of the expedition
Daniel Davis - Clinton Arvor, European rich leader of an ufologist sect
Doug Jones - The aliens (several roles)

Working titles:
- Jurassic Planet
- Jurassic Army
- Jurassic Park - Conquest

As long as it's not related to JP i'm all for it..

It would be entirely related to JP, with Joseph Mazzello reprising his role as a smart-ass dinosaur erudit kid now a grown-up archaelogyst/astronaut.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 13, 2013, 11:07:56 PM
 :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 13, 2013, 11:32:18 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Apr 13, 2013, 07:14:09 PM
Hate to be a pedant (did I convince anyone there?) but it's a Tylosaurus in JP:TG. They look a little similar but they're from totally different lineages - Tylosaurus is a mosasaur, quite closely related to snakes. Kronosaurus is a pliosaur, they appeared at least 50 million years before the mosasaur tree diverged from the lizardy Squamata, and their ancestors diverged from basal reptiles another 50 before that.

it's genetic engineering, rawr
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 13, 2013, 11:36:20 PM
From the 'Last Movie You Watched' thread:

Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 13, 2013, 11:35:11 PM
I just got back from Jurassic Park 3D. I'm not going to lie, as much as I love this movie, I just never did make plans to go see this. But a few hours ago my dad randomly suggested it, and how could I pass up the opportunity?

Needless to say, I loved every minute of it. The music, the special effects, the awe of the whole experience. And the 3D was great too. I'm not particularly fond of 3D and haven't seen many movies in the format, but this was certainly the best use of 3D in a live action film I have ever seen. The T-Rex's initial appearance left my jaw hanging on the floor...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 14, 2013, 01:21:59 AM
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=77543 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=77543)

JURASSIC PARK: Making Of The Animatronic T-Rex
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Apr 14, 2013, 09:49:48 AM
Quote from: Magegg on Apr 13, 2013, 10:14:41 PM
I'd like the next Jurassic Park film something akin to Prometheus.

An expedition travels to outer space and they find a strange asteroid containing an ecosystem filled with dinosaurs. Although everything seem to be alright, they find out there's an alien civilization that use the dinosaurs as weapons to conquer other planets, and they could be the responsible of the engineering of the Earth species.

It could be an epic trilogy including dinosaurs on UFOs attacking Earth.

Director: Ben Affleck

Cast:
Kristanna Loken - Dr. Christine Howard
Orlando Bloom - Dr. Edmund Rankin
Jake Glynenhall - Mr. David Graham, sponsor of the expedition
Daniel Davis - Clinton Arvor, European rich leader of an ufologist sect
Doug Jones - The aliens (several roles)

Working titles:
- Jurassic Planet
- Jurassic Army
- Jurassic Park - Conquest

TUROK the movie :P

Just got back watching Jurassic Park on the big screen

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstream1.gifsoup.com%2Fwebroot%2Fanimatedgifs%2F77734_o.gif&hash=080c4b8ac6b1de63d2bff832a499b2ac65ad69f6)

So good it brings a tear to my eye... or maybe it was just because of the 3D. One of the greatest movies of all time. I love it. Grew up watching it. I can only imagine how awesome it would be for anyone seeing it for the first time. I know the film back to front and still loved every minute.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 14, 2013, 03:39:11 PM
Anyone else bothered by the late start date for shooting?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Apr 14, 2013, 03:52:02 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 14, 2013, 03:39:11 PMAnyone else bothered by the late start date for shooting?

Nope, considering the other films "suffered" from the same.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Apr 14, 2013, 04:16:38 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 14, 2013, 03:39:11 PM
Anyone else bothered by the late start date for shooting?

They're filming in July right?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 14, 2013, 04:17:44 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Apr 14, 2013, 04:16:38 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 14, 2013, 03:39:11 PM
Anyone else bothered by the late start date for shooting?

They're filming in July right?

Yeah. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Apr 14, 2013, 04:21:04 PM
About the first one:

QuoteAfter 25 months of pre-production, filming began on August 24, 1992

QuoteRelease date(s) June 11, 1993

They worked with even less time for production and post.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 14, 2013, 04:38:37 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Apr 14, 2013, 04:21:04 PM
About the first one:

QuoteAfter 25 months of pre-production, filming began on August 24, 1992

QuoteRelease date(s) June 11, 1993

They worked with even less time for production and post.

Well then, I hope they can pull-off another miracle.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Apr 14, 2013, 06:18:51 PM
The number one rule of filmmaking is to "Never begin with a release date first." Doing so, only means the production will be rushed so the studio can have to movie released on such date given. You never do that. You always start with pre-production first and move forward with filming. By the time you're finished with post-production, you an set out a possible release date for the movie is already finished.

I don't know why so many movies try that now. It was never like that before. I always remember hearing it as "(insert movie title here) began production today, be on the look out for updates." You would have to wait months before we were given an official release date. Teaser trailers would always say "coming soon" now every teaser has an established date for when the movie comes out. It was always a mystery to me as to when a movie will be released. But they don't do that anymore. They put out a specific release date for any given movie now EVEN before any filming, casting, scripting has begun! That's not how you do it.

Doing so, causes the studio to like I said, rush through production and put together a patchy job. They start filming in July. Okay, good. We have a director, and an official set release date. Okay, no where is the cast? We have from now (April) until June to hear an official cast announced. That's nearly three months. What are the cast going to do? Start filming right away as they walk onto set? Christ, I hope they can rehearse their lines before cameras role. On top of that, the movie is released in June of 2014. Nearly a year away can you believe it? It's almost here.

If they start filming in July, I'd say production will wrap November/December. That gives them 2-3 months to do some post production editing and to pump out enough advertisements and marketing trailers, posters, toys, and so on. 2014 will be full blown Jurassic Park over exposure Summer Fever I'll you that. I can bet a trailer to be out by either this Winter or early Spring in March/April.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 14, 2013, 06:58:27 PM
The only reason JP1 had such a quick shoot was that the entire thing was storyboarded, so they had almost every single shot and angle conceived in advance. It was insanely well planned.
The vast majority of films don't have this kind of luxury, so in the absence of inside knowledge, the schedule is a bit worrying.

Still... If the script is good, they'll have arguably the most important part already sitting there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 14, 2013, 07:01:14 PM
That's a pretty big "if", frankly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Apr 14, 2013, 07:03:19 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 14, 2013, 07:01:14 PM
That's a pretty big "if", frankly.

It's written by the same team who wrote Rise of the Planet of the Apes. Which means I have nothing to worry about script wise  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 14, 2013, 07:04:05 PM
Too bad that was an overrated turkey.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 14, 2013, 07:21:18 PM
i have a feeling.. it'll be worse than the john sayles script...  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 14, 2013, 07:26:07 PM
At the very least it'll feel completely irrelevant, like the other Jurassic Park sequels.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Apr 14, 2013, 07:27:11 PM
I know...this movie will be a terrible pile of shit. We shouldn't get our hopes up at all. It might not live up to the hype and totally suck donkey balls. We're better off with the first movie. No need to ruin a franchise that was already tarnished when the third movie came out. This might be another Star Wars Episode I, Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, or Prometheus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 14, 2013, 07:28:35 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Apr 14, 2013, 07:27:11 PM
No need to ruin a franchise that was already tarnished when the third movie came out.
It was tarnished when the critically reviled second movie came out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Apr 14, 2013, 07:33:07 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 14, 2013, 07:28:35 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Apr 14, 2013, 07:27:11 PM
No need to ruin a franchise that was already tarnished when the third movie came out.
It was tarnished when the critically reviled second movie came out.
True. It's more tolerable to watch compared to the third movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 14, 2013, 07:35:50 PM
Was going to watch the second and third last weekend after seeing the original at the cinema, but decided I didn't wanna subject myself to the unbearable runtime of the second. Might watch the third one today out of good ol' fashioned bile fascination -- it's at least not over two hours long, ugh.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Apr 14, 2013, 07:53:07 PM
It's been years since I seen any of the movies. I can't find them on TV; they don't play on G4 or TNT like they used to. I own the 2005 "Adventure Pack" trilogy set, but haven't bought the blu-rays yet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 14, 2013, 09:44:55 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Apr 14, 2013, 07:27:11 PM
I know...this movie will be a terrible pile of shit. We shouldn't get our hopes up at all. It might not live up to the hype and totally suck donkey balls. We're better off with the first movie. No need to ruin a franchise that was already tarnished when the third movie came out. This might be another Star Wars Episode I, Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, or Prometheus.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdrnorth.files.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F12%2Fvlcsnap-2009-12-01-00h49m46s140.png&hash=d139c96143f72686bf852499e27ed76717184aab)

"In 48 hours 424 days, I'll be accepting YOUR apologies!"






Spoiler
Please don't fail me!
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Apr 14, 2013, 09:51:38 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 14, 2013, 07:21:18 PMi have a feeling.. it'll be worse than the john sayles script...  :P

That would be quite an achievement.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Apr 14, 2013, 10:08:40 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 14, 2013, 09:44:55 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Apr 14, 2013, 07:27:11 PM
I know...this movie will be a terrible pile of shit. We shouldn't get our hopes up at all. It might not live up to the hype and totally suck donkey balls. We're better off with the first movie. No need to ruin a franchise that was already tarnished when the third movie came out. This might be another Star Wars Episode I, Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, or Prometheus.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdrnorth.files.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F12%2Fvlcsnap-2009-12-01-00h49m46s140.png&hash=d139c96143f72686bf852499e27ed76717184aab)

"In 48 hours 424 days, I'll be accepting YOUR apologies!"






Spoiler
Please don't fail me!
[close]
:laugh: Relax, I was only being sarcastic towards Blacklabel's post:
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 14, 2013, 07:21:18 PM
i have a feeling.. it'll be worse than the john sayles script...  :P

I have good hopes in this being good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 14, 2013, 10:10:48 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Apr 14, 2013, 10:08:40 PM
I have good hopes in this being good.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DepartmentOfRedundancyDepartment (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DepartmentOfRedundancyDepartment)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 14, 2013, 10:23:02 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 14, 2013, 10:10:48 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Apr 14, 2013, 10:08:40 PM
I have good hopes in this being good.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DepartmentOfRedundancyDepartment (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DepartmentOfRedundancyDepartment)

Tropes Are Not Bad (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/TropesAreTools)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 15, 2013, 03:10:03 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 14, 2013, 07:28:35 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Apr 14, 2013, 07:27:11 PM
No need to ruin a franchise that was already tarnished when the third movie came out.
It was tarnished when the critically reviled second movie came out.

Reviled? It hit 52% on RT.com; not exactly a horrendous score.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 15, 2013, 03:37:54 AM
Still rotten. Even the user rating is rotten.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 15, 2013, 03:49:43 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 15, 2013, 03:37:54 AM
Still rotten. Even the user rating is rotten.

6.3/10 on IMDB; not too shabby.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 15, 2013, 03:51:48 AM
Alien Resurrection is 6.2, and you hate that, so... :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 15, 2013, 03:53:00 AM
TLW is so much better than A:R, don't even!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 15, 2013, 03:53:32 AM
Not according to the IMDB user scores ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 15, 2013, 04:11:33 AM
6.3 vs. 6.2

It's still better, rawr.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 15, 2013, 04:57:35 AM
God who the hell cares for IMDb or RT ratings.

If you don't like either of those films, don't watch them. Nobody ever forced anybody to watch A:R or TLW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 15, 2013, 05:00:28 AM
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SeriousBusiness (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SeriousBusiness)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Apr 15, 2013, 05:01:29 AM
One day, the TV Tropes servers will crash.

A Cvalda will lose her voice.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 15, 2013, 05:02:14 AM
A Cvalda? What is it, there's more than one now?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Apr 15, 2013, 05:03:54 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Apr 15, 2013, 05:02:14 AM
A Cvalda? What is it, there's more than one now?

There was never just one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 15, 2013, 05:04:25 AM
This is getting out of hand. Now there are two of them!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 15, 2013, 05:07:42 AM
Does this mean I can make out with myself now? :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 15, 2013, 05:08:39 AM
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Narcissist (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Narcissist)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 15, 2013, 05:10:50 AM
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ScrewYourself (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ScrewYourself)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Apr 15, 2013, 05:15:39 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 15, 2013, 05:07:42 AM
Does this mean I can make out with myself now? :o

Made out, making out, will make out.

Different sides of the same coin.

The point is, somewhere, somewhen, you already have.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 15, 2013, 05:16:54 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theawl.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F03%2Fhollyhunter-e1364325767980.jpg&hash=e6315fceee89f9694e0af3407e3e94c87dd43fc9)
Far out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Apr 15, 2013, 05:17:16 AM
This whole page --  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: LarsVader on Apr 15, 2013, 05:17:52 AM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Apr 15, 2013, 05:04:25 AM
This is getting out of hand. Now there are two of them!
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2F3bf7ccdae64e039ece29c86ed829efc6%2Ftumblr_mh7o6urLaO1ruhqgxo1_500.gif&hash=1af7b5c47ba0650a232c85715468eee0ceacab4b)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: coolbreeze on Apr 15, 2013, 05:19:40 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 15, 2013, 05:07:42 AM
Does this mean I can make out with myself now? :o

Why make out with yourself when you have such a huge pool of guys on here.... :laugh:.... :-X
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 15, 2013, 05:22:16 AM
I don't have enough places to hide the bodies afterwards :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: coolbreeze on Apr 15, 2013, 05:23:53 AM
I could help with that. I may or may not have access to a morgue..  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 15, 2013, 05:24:40 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.perezhilton.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F03%2Foprah-named-forbes-most-influential-celebrity-2013%25281%2529.gif&hash=4ca2ce34074cfb88fbe3da287c71ee8c8756905b)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: LarsVader on Apr 15, 2013, 05:25:34 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 15, 2013, 05:22:16 AM
I don't have enough places to hide the bodies afterwards :-\
Where's the problem, he said huge pool of guys .
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 15, 2013, 05:28:26 AM
...

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1223.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fdd503%2Fyaryar3%2FIMG_3112.jpg&hash=c087e57aed4bc9a116de4724c59820884075533a)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 15, 2013, 05:42:49 AM
Where's Rick Grimes when you need him...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 15, 2013, 05:44:01 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 15, 2013, 05:42:49 AM
Where's Rick Grimes when you need him...
Buried in a ditch somewhere.

IT WASN'T ME.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: coolbreeze on Apr 15, 2013, 05:45:29 AM
Don't worry Cvalda, I got this.  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Apr 15, 2013, 05:51:20 AM
I just wanna watch Cvalda make out with herself. :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 15, 2013, 05:53:31 AM
Send $100 bucks to my Paypal account and I can make your dreams come trueeee~~~
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Apr 15, 2013, 05:57:30 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 15, 2013, 05:53:31 AM
Send $100 bucks to my Paypal account and I can make your dreams come trueeee~~~

Sent, sending, will send...

Different sides of the same coin.

Somewhere, somewhen, I already have.

So fork the footage over.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 15, 2013, 05:58:03 AM
Somewhere, somewhen, I already have. :3
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Apr 15, 2013, 05:58:33 AM
Prove it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 15, 2013, 06:00:14 AM
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Apr 15, 2013, 06:01:14 AM
I foiled your plot! I clicked the "QUOTE" button!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 15, 2013, 06:03:31 AM
 >:( Somewhere, somewhen, assassins have been dispatched.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Apr 15, 2013, 06:05:46 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn2.mocksession.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F03%2FSTERLING-DANCE.gif&hash=36efdd1ed808f833e636699293e0be6cae5dcd5e)
YOU MAD
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Apr 15, 2013, 06:13:12 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 15, 2013, 06:03:31 AM
>:( Somewhere, somewhen, assassins have been dispatched.
Somewhere, somewhen, he's already sleeping with the assassin(s).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 15, 2013, 06:28:42 AM
K, this thread has gone into a weird direction...

how about dem gen-engineered dinoz eh?!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 15, 2013, 06:48:18 AM
Any updates on that Chickenosaurus project from Jack Horner and his crew?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Apr 15, 2013, 12:17:52 PM
TLW isn't that bad story and acting wise, but there are several scenes that are so not in keeping with the atmosphere and mood of the film itself that you can't help but be taken out of the movie by them, and it suffers a great deal because of it. The gymnastics kick to the velociraptor being the main one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 15, 2013, 12:26:13 PM
Somewhere, somewhen, Jurassic Park IV was great,

Somewhere, somewhen else, it sucked.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 15, 2013, 01:02:32 PM
Bitches, please. You're just stealing mine and Rosalind's bit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 15, 2013, 01:20:13 PM
Somewhere, somewhen, you're stealing my bit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 15, 2013, 09:16:15 PM
So here I am, pondering about one day customizing a Jeep Wrangler to look like the one from JP when I stumble across this,

http://www.therpf.com/f9/jurassic-park-jeep-84971/ (http://www.therpf.com/f9/jurassic-park-jeep-84971/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Apr 15, 2013, 09:33:49 PM
I still haven't seen JP3D. When will it stop showing in theaters? I've been busy with finals, and hope I get a chance to see it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 15, 2013, 10:18:08 PM
Pretty sure it ended a day or two ago.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 15, 2013, 10:19:30 PM
Not sure if you're being sarcastic or not, but its still going strong where I am.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Apr 15, 2013, 10:20:33 PM
Still going to be in theaters for a while here too. At least until the 18th.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 16, 2013, 12:01:50 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 15, 2013, 10:19:30 PM
Not sure if you're being sarcastic or not, but its still going strong where I am.

Wasn't; I honestly thought it only had a week-long run.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 16, 2013, 12:13:28 AM
Nah, with 3D rereleases like this they've usually been treating them like any other Hollywood release as of late.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 16, 2013, 12:39:00 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Apr 15, 2013, 09:33:49 PM
I still haven't seen JP3D. When will it stop showing in theaters? I've been busy with finals, and hope I get a chance to see it.

Not sure but they're releasing the 3D Blu-ray this month. ::)

Pretty much lost the drive to see this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 16, 2013, 12:51:17 AM
This month? :o That was fast.

Can't say I care to buy it, not having a 3D Blu Ray player and all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 16, 2013, 01:01:28 AM
The 3D Blu Ray is supposed to suck pretty bad, from what I've heard.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 16, 2013, 01:04:31 AM
Funny. In theaters it was actually the best 3D I've seen on a live action film (of the whole three or four 3D live action movies I've gone to see).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Apr 16, 2013, 01:24:29 AM
Good. It is still playing at my theater.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 16, 2013, 01:46:02 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Apr 16, 2013, 01:01:28 AM
The 3D Blu Ray is supposed to suck pretty bad, from what I've heard.

Reviews are already out?? That was fast.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 16, 2013, 02:28:34 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Apr 16, 2013, 12:39:00 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Apr 15, 2013, 09:33:49 PM
I still haven't seen JP3D. When will it stop showing in theaters? I've been busy with finals, and hope I get a chance to see it.

Not sure but they're releasing the 3D Blu-ray this month. ::)

Pretty much lost the drive to see this.

GO.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 16, 2013, 02:29:40 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 16, 2013, 02:28:34 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Apr 16, 2013, 12:39:00 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Apr 15, 2013, 09:33:49 PM
I still haven't seen JP3D. When will it stop showing in theaters? I've been busy with finals, and hope I get a chance to see it.

Not sure but they're releasing the 3D Blu-ray this month. ::)

Pretty much lost the drive to see this.

GO.

COLLECT 200 DOLLARS.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 16, 2013, 02:30:38 AM
So...is a fourth movie really happening or not?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 16, 2013, 02:34:20 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 16, 2013, 02:28:34 AM
GO.

Nah. I am good. Thanks.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 16, 2013, 02:34:59 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Apr 16, 2013, 02:30:38 AM
So...is a fourth movie really happening or not?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi218.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fcc275%2Fthehousenextdoor%2F2007%2FNo%2520Country%2520MZS%2Fnocountryjones.jpg&hash=1f204cd6d293d5eea633f4440dcfd342f1bec054)



Quote from: First Blood on Apr 16, 2013, 02:34:20 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 16, 2013, 02:28:34 AM
GO.

Nah. I am good. Thanks.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi218.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fcc275%2Fthehousenextdoor%2F2007%2FNo%2520Country%2520MZS%2Fnocountryjones.jpg&hash=1f204cd6d293d5eea633f4440dcfd342f1bec054)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 16, 2013, 02:42:51 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 16, 2013, 02:34:59 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Apr 16, 2013, 02:30:38 AM
So...is a fourth movie really happening or not?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi218.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fcc275%2Fthehousenextdoor%2F2007%2FNo%2520Country%2520MZS%2Fnocountryjones.jpg&hash=1f204cd6d293d5eea633f4440dcfd342f1bec054)



Quote from: First Blood on Apr 16, 2013, 02:34:20 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 16, 2013, 02:28:34 AM
GO.

Nah. I am good. Thanks.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi218.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fcc275%2Fthehousenextdoor%2F2007%2FNo%2520Country%2520MZS%2Fnocountryjones.jpg&hash=1f204cd6d293d5eea633f4440dcfd342f1bec054)

:P

1. I honestly do not know.

2. JP3D is something that does not interest me in the least.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Apr 16, 2013, 02:47:29 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 16, 2013, 01:04:31 AM
Funny. In theaters it was actually the best 3D I've seen on a live action film (of the whole three or four 3D live action movies I've gone to see).
Did you see Tron: Legacy or Prometheus in 3D?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 02:49:24 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Apr 16, 2013, 02:42:51 AM
2. JP3D is something that does not interest me in the least.
Go see Rocky Horror instead ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 16, 2013, 02:55:34 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 02:49:24 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Apr 16, 2013, 02:42:51 AM
2. JP3D is something that does not interest me in the least.
Go see Rocky Horror instead ;D

I'm picking it up Friday after class.



I'M HOLDING YOU ACCOUNTABLE FOR THE HYPE    :P :P :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 02:56:39 AM
I see you shiver with ANTICI----











--------PATION.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 16, 2013, 02:57:31 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 02:56:39 AM
I see you shiver with ANTICI----











--------PATION.

We. Shall. See.  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 16, 2013, 02:58:35 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Apr 16, 2013, 02:47:29 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 16, 2013, 01:04:31 AM
Funny. In theaters it was actually the best 3D I've seen on a live action film (of the whole three or four 3D live action movies I've gone to see).
Did you see Tron: Legacy or Prometheus in 3D?

I saw Tron: Legacy in 3D (for my second viewing). It was interesting and I liked how they relegated the 3D to the sequences in the Grid, but other than that it really did nothing for me. :-\ I saw Prometheus in regular 2D.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 16, 2013, 02:59:32 AM
Avatar was the best film shot in 3D.


COME AT ME.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 02:59:55 AM
Yeah, pretty much.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 16, 2013, 03:00:59 AM
Only saw that one in 2D as well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 16, 2013, 03:00:59 AM
Sure. But as a film, it sucks.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 03:01:41 AM
You didn't like Avatar, FB? :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 16, 2013, 03:02:14 AM
Noooooo. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 03:03:10 AM
Wow, even I thought that was solid :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 16, 2013, 03:04:55 AM
The story is crap and takes a backseat to Cameron getting off and being self indulgent with his effects.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 03:06:10 AM
Yeah, it's incredibly derivative and kinda dumb, but it's done with real craft and skill. It'll definitely be dated down the line in its effects, and it's no masterpiece, but it's a good blockbuster.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 16, 2013, 03:10:49 AM
I really don't have a problem with Avatar either, to be honest. It certainly wasn't the revolutionary science fiction gamechanger that it was boasted as being prior to its release (in terms of story. In terms of visual effects, however, it was quite revolutionary and opened up many possibilities for current and future filmmakers to play around with). The story was definitely very by the numbers, but it was well directed and certainly entertained me. Now I kind of want to see it again, actually.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 16, 2013, 03:12:16 AM
...It's an imaginative retelling of a quality story. :P

SHOULD'VE WON THE BEST MOVIE OSCAR.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 16, 2013, 03:16:01 AM
lolnope
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 16, 2013, 03:17:56 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Apr 16, 2013, 03:16:01 AM
lolnope

STFU First Blood.

The Hurt Locker was such an Oscar black hole ;-;
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 03:19:12 AM
lol, Aspie
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Apr 16, 2013, 03:19:25 AM
I liek Avetur.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 03:20:37 AM
You like everything.



Spoiler
I kid :P
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 16, 2013, 03:20:46 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Apr 16, 2013, 03:19:25 AM
I liek Avetur.

Avetour*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 16, 2013, 03:22:22 AM
I am surprised you thought it was a solid movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 16, 2013, 03:24:09 AM
But it was :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 03:24:38 AM
Yeah! :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 16, 2013, 03:25:55 AM
Nope. :P

It's eye candy. Nothing more.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Apr 16, 2013, 03:27:18 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Apr 16, 2013, 03:20:46 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Apr 16, 2013, 03:19:25 AM
I liek Avetur.

Avetour*
I was using the American spelling.  :P

Quote from: First Blood on Apr 16, 2013, 03:22:22 AM
I am surprised you thought it was a solid movie.
Come onnn dudeeee! It was a lot of fun, and for such a huge blockbuster, it wasn't anything insulting.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 03:28:40 AM
Yeah!




>_> Why do I feel like I should be on the other side of this debate?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 16, 2013, 03:29:20 AM
That's what's odd. I am surprised you liked it. Given your taste.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 03:30:14 AM
Well, FWIW, I saw it twice in the cinema and I don't think I ever need to see it again :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 16, 2013, 03:34:10 AM
I liked Avatar, but Inglourious Basterds should have gotten the Oscar. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Apr 16, 2013, 03:36:42 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 03:28:40 AM
>_> Why do I feel like I should be on the other side of this debate?
Don't worry, you don't neeeed to hate everything that's a blockbuster.

Like Titanic! It's the James Cameron blockbuster magic!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 16, 2013, 03:38:52 AM
Yup. Say what you will about Cameron, but the guy is a damn good director and knows how to both entertain and provoke emotion from an audience while pushing the limits of special effects.

Quote from: KiramidHead on Apr 16, 2013, 03:34:10 AM
Inglourious Basterds

Another one I need to watch soon. Bought it a couple weeks ago, sitting on my shelf.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 03:40:11 AM
Too bad he's devoted the rest of his career to making Avatar sequels. ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 16, 2013, 03:41:24 AM
Urgh.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 03:42:38 AM
The first one was a complete, satisfying story.

Don't need sequels where Jake fights off more humans and talks to Sigourney force ghost style, pffft.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Apr 16, 2013, 03:43:26 AM
UNDERWATER
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 16, 2013, 03:47:50 AM
Just what we need, another f**king mega-blockbuster sequel in a sea of mega-blockbuster sequels. Must be nice to have money to burn. Christ, I don't think I've ever been this cynical on these boards before. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 03:49:19 AM
bitches about blockbuster sequels

has a hard on for all the upcoming Marvel sequels
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Apr 16, 2013, 03:50:45 AM
Guys I think we should write the scripts for the next seventeen Avatar movies.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 16, 2013, 03:50:56 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 03:49:19 AM
has a hard on for all the upcoming Marvel sequels

When have I ever expressed that? Yeah, I look forward to some of them, but I am not foaming at the mouth for them.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 03:51:27 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Apr 16, 2013, 03:50:45 AM
Guys I think we should write the scripts for the next seventeen Avatar movies.
I will only sign on if I can turn them into pornos.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 16, 2013, 03:51:58 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Apr 16, 2013, 03:50:45 AM
Guys I think we should write the scripts for the next seventeen Avatar movies.

Can the sixth one have a sphess battel with Na'Vi riding sphess dinosaurs?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 03:54:06 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Apr 16, 2013, 03:50:56 AM
When have I ever expressed that? Yeah, I look forward to some of them, but I am not foaming at the mouth for them.
pfffffft, how dare you refute my strawman.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Apr 16, 2013, 03:54:52 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 03:51:27 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Apr 16, 2013, 03:50:45 AM
Guys I think we should write the scripts for the next seventeen Avatar movies.
I will only sign on if I can turn them into pornos.
NO. We shall write them as pornos from the ground up! : D

Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 16, 2013, 03:51:58 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Apr 16, 2013, 03:50:45 AM
Guys I think we should write the scripts for the next seventeen Avatar movies.

Can the sixth one have a sphess battel with Na'Vi riding sphess dinosaurs?
Shooting lasers from their eyes? Yes, this is sounding in-line with our vision.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 03:57:33 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Apr 16, 2013, 03:54:52 AM
NO. We shall write them as pornos from the ground up! : D
...


(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fblog-imgs-51-origin.fc2.com%2Fy%2Fu%2Fl%2Fyulichow%2Faliens5.jpg&hash=99f91b3dbfa45bafa6f868f492a2491e44ff2bdd)
Alright, I'm in.


Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 16, 2013, 04:02:16 AM
Sphess catman dinosaur the porno

In 3 double d.

With lazer eyes.

Got it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Apr 16, 2013, 04:06:30 AM
I think things will really culminate at Avatar 13: Catmin Chronic-Caliber Tail-Rail. Very much the emotional peak of the series.

oh shit

this is the jurassic park thread
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 04:07:27 AM
We'll make one of them a Jurassic Park crossover.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 16, 2013, 04:08:17 AM
Its k gaiz. The t-rex roar was in the first Avitir.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Apr 16, 2013, 04:10:36 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 04:07:27 AM
We'll make one of them a Jurassic Park crossover.
The Adventures of John Hesmond and Jek Sooley

Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 16, 2013, 04:08:17 AM
Its k gaiz. The t-rex roar was in the first Avitir.
...

Quote from: SpaceMarines on Apr 15, 2013, 05:48:26 AM
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FnxSRt8X.gif&hash=59b6b1560274cfb92dc01c93fa39aeee5a6a5576)
CANON!!!!!111!!11
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 04:12:19 AM
I wish I could change my username to John Hesmond.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 16, 2013, 04:13:35 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 04:12:19 AM
I wish I could change my username to John Hesmond.

life finds a way, mr. hesmond
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 04:15:37 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_lxv4l4l1g01qmz9r9o1_500.png&hash=2fee260e8ca47e839b6778c7185402f31538d77c)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 16, 2013, 04:28:50 AM
I can't really blame Cameron for going for more Avatar movies. He's got to pay for dem submarines somehow.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 16, 2013, 04:32:20 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 04:15:37 AM
http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxv4l4l1g01qmz9r9o1_500.png

"I'm totally unappreciated in my time."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ShadowPred on Apr 16, 2013, 04:33:42 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 04:12:19 AM
I wish I could change my username to John Hesmond.


You could ask the admins to do that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 04:36:42 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F24.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_mcy275zdpk1rk5nzxo1_500.jpg&hash=5796f5f9fbd7b499153f8a4eec8ba5b893a3aea6)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: LarsVader on Apr 16, 2013, 06:28:31 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 03:51:27 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Apr 16, 2013, 03:50:45 AM
Guys I think we should write the scripts for the next seventeen Avatar movies.
I will only sign on if I can turn them into pornos.
And yet again Cvalda makes me post NSFW links:
Spoiler
http://www.fleshlight-international.eu/alien (http://www.fleshlight-international.eu/alien)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 16, 2013, 06:34:59 AM
Spoiler
John Hesmond approves.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc03.deviantart.net%2Ffs12%2Fi%2F2006%2F270%2Fb%2Fe%2FWelcome_to_Jurassic_Park_by_ChemicalAlia.jpg&hash=34bd8ca6b3e8073ead1cf63a620f870e6d7051fc)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 17, 2013, 02:41:37 PM
Made this teaser quickly.  I know the "IV" is a little off center...

(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/554668_4417877136518_766555051_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 17, 2013, 02:44:20 PM
Not a bad idea for a poster! Wish the landscape would be more "recognisable" though.. maybe with the "large door" of the first movie? :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 18, 2013, 12:37:31 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 17, 2013, 02:44:20 PM
Not a bad idea for a poster! Wish the landscape would be more "recognisable" though.. maybe with the "large door" of the first movie? :P

I was thinking the same thing. People wouldn't recognize the mountains as being from a specific movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Apr 18, 2013, 12:39:14 AM
Good thing it's just for the fans then. I recognized it immediately.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Apr 18, 2013, 12:39:31 AM
And one of the doors is gone.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Apr 18, 2013, 12:41:16 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 17, 2013, 02:41:37 PM
Made this teaser quickly.  I know the "IV" is a little off center...

(https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/554668_4417877136518_766555051_n.jpg)

For a second there, I thought that was official.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 18, 2013, 05:24:53 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Apr 18, 2013, 12:39:14 AM
Good thing it's just for the fans then. I recognized it immediately.
Same!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 18, 2013, 05:57:50 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Apr 18, 2013, 12:39:14 AM
Good thing it's just for the fans then. I recognized it immediately.

Yeah so did I. Any fan would.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 18, 2013, 03:30:20 PM
Nice poster! I kinda like the slanted I on the IV. Makes it seem more feral.

I wouldn't mind if that was a poster for the movie. I think for most the IV would be a dead giveaway. For those that don't know, let the curiosity consume them so they can search it online later. And then when it's closer to release have a regular poster up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Apr 18, 2013, 07:36:21 PM
Talked to a friend who had no idea Jurassic Park was a movie adaptation of a novel. Now I got her to read the book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Apr 18, 2013, 07:38:15 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Apr 18, 2013, 07:36:21 PM
Talked to a friend who had no idea Jurassic Park was a movie adaptation of a novel. Now I got her to read the book.
Spread the word to the ignorant common folk.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 18, 2013, 11:39:08 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Apr 18, 2013, 03:30:20 PM
Nice poster! I kinda like the slanted I on the IV. Makes it seem more feral.

I wouldn't mind if that was a poster for the movie. I think for most the IV would be a dead giveaway. For those that don't know, let the curiosity consume them so they can search it online later. And then when it's closer to release have a regular poster up.

Exactamundo  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 19, 2013, 02:56:41 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Apr 18, 2013, 07:36:21 PM
Talked to a friend who had no idea Jurassic Park was a movie adaptation of a novel. Now I got her to read the book.

Did she miss the credit which said, "Based on the novel by Michael Crichton"?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Apr 19, 2013, 03:04:28 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 19, 2013, 02:56:41 AM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on Apr 18, 2013, 07:36:21 PM
Talked to a friend who had no idea Jurassic Park was a movie adaptation of a novel. Now I got her to read the book.

Did she miss the credit which said, "Based on the novel by Michael Crichton"?

I guess not.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 19, 2013, 03:19:50 AM
You mean you guess. If she hadn't missed it, she would've seen it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on Apr 19, 2013, 03:21:37 AM
She's seen the movie obviously. I asked if she read the book. She sounded surprised and said "it's based off a book?" Like she didn't know. Maybe she must have not paid much attention to it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 20, 2013, 06:44:36 PM
 Frank Marshall ‏@LeDoctor 31m

Always great to catch up on dinosaurs with Jack Horner.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenodog on Apr 20, 2013, 07:53:42 PM
Anyone else ever wondered what the series   first-two films first two films if they'd actually bothered to read the second beyond the chapter titles would be like if they had gone with the darker, more thriller-esque side of it?
I think despite being more niche and considerably less popular (less family friendly obviously) it still could have done quite well. I would have really loved to have seen the Carnotaurus scene from the second book in film, that gripped me so much as a kid.
And of course the missed characters like Levine in the second.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Apr 20, 2013, 08:01:25 PM
I really didn't much care for The Lost World novel. I was fine with the changes made.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenodog on Apr 20, 2013, 08:07:28 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Apr 20, 2013, 08:01:25 PM
I really didn't much care for The Lost World novel. I was fine with the changes made.
...
wat
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 20, 2013, 08:07:57 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Apr 20, 2013, 08:01:25 PM
I really didn't much care for The Lost World novel. I was fine with the changes made.

No one did.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenodog on Apr 20, 2013, 08:12:04 PM
Screw you all.  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 20, 2013, 08:15:19 PM
Quote from: Xenodog on Apr 20, 2013, 08:12:04 PM
Screw you all.  :-\
Screw The Lost World. It was the Hannibal Rising of the JP franchise.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 20, 2013, 08:16:43 PM
Quote from: Xenodog on Apr 20, 2013, 08:07:28 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Apr 20, 2013, 08:01:25 PM
I really didn't much care for The Lost World novel. I was fine with the changes made.
...
wat

My thoughts exactly O.O Obviously not as great as the first, but the second book was great. Loved the Carnotaur scene.

And the R version of this series would have been great. If only...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 20, 2013, 08:22:08 PM
Quote from: Xenodog on Apr 20, 2013, 07:53:42 PM
Anyone else ever wondered what the series   first-two films first two films if they'd actually bothered to read the second beyond the chapter titles would be like if they had gone with the darker, more thriller-esque side of it?
I think despite being more niche and considerably less popular (less family friendly obviously) it still could have done quite well. I would have really loved to have seen the Carnotaurus scene from the second book in film, that gripped me so much as a kid.
And of course the missed characters like Levine in the second.

You never know, you might get your wish in 20 year's time.

Quote from: Aspie on Apr 20, 2013, 08:15:19 PM
Quote from: Xenodog on Apr 20, 2013, 08:12:04 PM
Screw you all.  :-\
Screw The Lost World. It was the Hannibal Rising of the JP franchise.

No.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 20, 2013, 08:24:28 PM
Yes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 20, 2013, 08:33:55 PM
Needz more effort.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenodog on Apr 20, 2013, 08:34:48 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 20, 2013, 08:22:08 PM
Quote from: Xenodog on Apr 20, 2013, 07:53:42 PM
Anyone else ever wondered what the series   first-two films first two films if they'd actually bothered to read the second beyond the chapter titles would be like if they had gone with the darker, more thriller-esque side of it?
I think despite being more niche and considerably less popular (less family friendly obviously) it still could have done quite well. I would have really loved to have seen the Carnotaurus scene from the second book in film, that gripped me so much as a kid.
And of course the missed characters like Levine in the second.

You never know, you might get your wish in 20 year's time.

Don't get me wrong, I love the first film like the rest of us here, I just wonder is all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 20, 2013, 08:37:35 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Apr 20, 2013, 08:33:55 PM
Needz more effort.

So did The Lost World.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 20, 2013, 08:39:25 PM
Nah, TLW put all the effort and it succeeds;

you don't even try.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Apr 20, 2013, 08:43:28 PM
Quote from: Xenodog on Apr 20, 2013, 08:07:28 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Apr 20, 2013, 08:01:25 PM
I really didn't much care for The Lost World novel. I was fine with the changes made.
...
wat

I just found it boring and uninteresting, and the characters even more underdeveloped than is usual for Crichton. Felt like he really didn't want to make the book, so he didn't put much effort into it; wrote it simply because Spielberg urged it and the fanbase demanded it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 20, 2013, 08:45:02 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Apr 20, 2013, 08:39:25 PM
Nah, TLW put all the effort and it succeeds;

you don't even try.

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=990CE1DF143BF933A25753C1A963958260 (http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=990CE1DF143BF933A25753C1A963958260)

QuoteHaving set up this basic mise en scene, Mr. Crichton proceeds to give the reader a tired rehash of "Jurassic Park," one so predictable and unimaginative that it seems to have been intended to save special-effects technicians the hassle of doing new work on the movie sequel. Once again, we see a hungry tyrannosaur snack on one of the bad guys. Once again, we see some voracious velociraptors chase the good guys around. And once again, we see the good guys escape, thanks to the savvy of the children. As in "Jurassic Park," there are lots of scenes of dinosaurs romping about a scenic island and lots of scenes of man's technology succumbing to the raw force of nature. All, needless to say, without the surprise or ingenuity that made "Jurassic Park" entertaining the first time around.

Mr. Crichton has never exactly been known for his attention to character, and "The Lost World" must surely represent a new low in this area. Take, for instance, Ian Malcolm, who was played by Jeff Goldblum in the movie. Except for complaining about the injuries he suffered in "Jurassic Park," Malcolm makes virtually no reference to his previous visit to dino-land: we are not even given any insight into his feelings about returning to the place where he (nearly) died. Given Malcolm's irreverence, it seems hard to believe that he would abide by "nondisclosure agreements" with InGen or the Costa Rican Government, or that he would feel indebted by InGen's payment of his medical bills. Had he -- or Lewis Dodgson, for that matter -- really needed to make money, they could have simply written a book about their experiences in Jurassic Park, gone on the talk-show circuit and made a fortune.

Instead of even making a half-hearted attempt to turn Malcolm into a reasonable facsimile of a person, Mr. Crichton cynically uses him as a mouthpiece for all sorts of portentous techno-babble about chaos theory, extinction theories and mankind's destructive nature. As for the other characters, they are each given handy labels for easy identification. We know that Sarah is a feminist because she's less afraid of the dinosaurs than the men are. We know that Arby and Kelly are resourceful children because they're better at using computers than the adults are. And we know that Dodgson is an evil opportunist because he goes to a dinosaur nest and tries to steal eggs belonging to a loving pair of tyrannosaurs.

lol, the novel was shit from beginning to end.



Quote from: SpaceMarines on Apr 20, 2013, 08:43:28 PM
Quote from: Xenodog on Apr 20, 2013, 08:07:28 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Apr 20, 2013, 08:01:25 PM
I really didn't much care for The Lost World novel. I was fine with the changes made.
...
wat

I just found it boring and uninteresting, and the characters even more underdeveloped than is usual for Crichton. Felt like he really didn't want to make the book, so he didn't put much effort into it; wrote it simply because Spielberg urged it and the fanbase demanded it.

Bingo. It was the HANNIBAL RISING for JP.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Apr 20, 2013, 08:53:17 PM
Yeah, one of my least favourite Crichton novels. Only State of Fear is worse.




Wait... I'm... agreeing with Aspie?

This, situation, this... circumstance, I...

I need a moment.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 20, 2013, 08:58:26 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Apr 20, 2013, 08:53:17 PM
Yeah, one of my least favourite Crichton novels. Only State of Fear is worse.




Wait... I'm... agreeing with Aspie?

This, situation, this... circumstance, I...

I need a moment.

I also think State of Fear was total garbage. <_< ... >_>

But not as much as the Lost World was.

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_lgt6szkKT91qafrh6.gif&hash=c868e5571bbb2f7c1de5037cdcf9c1f0e9ded843)
[close]

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Apr 20, 2013, 09:00:02 PM
And the moment has passed...

A return to normalcy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Elliott on Apr 20, 2013, 09:13:46 PM
Quote from: Xenodog on Apr 20, 2013, 08:12:04 PM
Screw you all.  :-\
It's okay, I enjoyed The Lost World just as much as the original. C:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 20, 2013, 10:32:34 PM
Quote from: Galli on Apr 20, 2013, 09:13:46 PM
Quote from: Xenodog on Apr 20, 2013, 08:12:04 PM
Screw you all.  :-\
It's okay, I enjoyed The Lost World just as much as the original. C:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi0.kym-cdn.com%2Fphotos%2Fimages%2Fnewsfeed%2F000%2F181%2F907%2FMassimo-DAlema.jpg%3F1317751303&hash=11857b830fa8dacd797e3826bc7693fb7e275edc)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 20, 2013, 11:05:35 PM
TLW isn't quite in the same league as the first book in my opinion, but the review Aspie pulled up is a steaming pile of fresh rhino manure.
There's a lot of thought-provoking theory in the book, and looking further into it can be a journey down the rabbit hole. Once you start looking at problems in evolution, you start looking at self-organising behaviour, which in turn leads to Fibonacci sequences and some incredibly bizarrely ordered patterns that occur in nature. It's a book about theory more than anything else really, in my opinion, and exploring further depth in concepts addressed by the first book. The other major element is exploration in the modern age, which Crichton handled more thoroughly in Congo.

As for the film, I'm not too bothered that it deviated so far from the book, but I think they missed an opportunity to give it a proper message that you'd walk away with as strongly as the potentially deadly consequences of cutting-edge science in the first film. TLW brushed up against issues of conservationism, and the merits of preservation versus exploitation, but it didn't press the matter home.
And that's an opportunity that's probably lost for good now, there was never any chance that JP3 would have 'something to say'.

:edit: added part 2 and applied topical cream on some midnight posting syndrome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 20, 2013, 11:06:05 PM
Whether you prefer the TLW movie or book depends on what kinds of BS you're willing to put up with: Ian Malcolm not shutting up and acting like an ass, or a preachy, half-assed animal rights message with a gaggle of obnoxious protagonists.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 20, 2013, 11:10:44 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Apr 20, 2013, 11:05:35 PM
TLW isn't quite in the same league as the first book in my opinion, but the review Aspie pulled up is a steaming pile of fresh rhino manure.
There's a lot of interesting theory in the book, and looking further into it can be a journey down the rabbit hole. Once you start looking at problems in evolution, you start looking at self-organising behaviour, which in turn leads to Fibonacci sequences and some incredibly bizarrely ordered patterns that occur in nature. It's a book about theory more than anything else really, in my opinion, and exploring further depth in concepts addressed by the first book. The other major element is exploration in the modern age, which was handled in far more depth in Congo.

Yes that's just one of the bad reviews. I've seen far kinder reviews. There's always two sides to the coin.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 20, 2013, 11:19:11 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Apr 20, 2013, 11:06:05 PM
Whether you prefer the TLW movie or book depends on what kinds of BS you're willing to put up with: Ian Malcolm not shutting up and acting like an ass, or a preachy, half-assed animal rights message with a gaggle of obnoxious protagonists.
And gymnastics!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 21, 2013, 12:02:40 AM
TLW
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgallery.allwomenstalk.com%2FMovies%2F2011%2F02%2F9-books-that-did-not-make-great-movies%2F3_hannibal-rising_9-books-that-did-not-make-great-movies.jpg&hash=7d3e8aa93cebefbc440e7762cbd18c8b95a89556)


Spoiler
Just with dinosaurs.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Apr 21, 2013, 12:28:45 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Apr 21, 2013, 12:02:40 AM
TLW
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgallery.allwomenstalk.com%2FMovies%2F2011%2F02%2F9-books-that-did-not-make-great-movies%2F3_hannibal-rising_9-books-that-did-not-make-great-movies.jpg&hash=7d3e8aa93cebefbc440e7762cbd18c8b95a89556)


Spoiler
Just with dinosaurs.
[close]

Never read it. But now I kind of want to...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 21, 2013, 12:31:07 AM
Quote from: Remonster on Apr 21, 2013, 12:28:45 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Apr 21, 2013, 12:02:40 AM
TLW
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgallery.allwomenstalk.com%2FMovies%2F2011%2F02%2F9-books-that-did-not-make-great-movies%2F3_hannibal-rising_9-books-that-did-not-make-great-movies.jpg&hash=7d3e8aa93cebefbc440e7762cbd18c8b95a89556)


Spoiler
Just with dinosaurs.
[close]

Never read it. But now I kind of want to...

For a good laugh I presume?

If so, I can guarantee you that Hannibal Rising might be just as horrible as The Lost World. And that's really saying something.

Quote from: KiramidHead on Apr 20, 2013, 11:06:05 PM
Whether you prefer the TLW movie or book depends on what kinds of BS you're willing to put up with: Ian Malcolm not shutting up and acting like an ass, or a preachy, half-assed animal rights message with a gaggle of obnoxious protagonists.

The only thing worse than TLW novel was TLW: The movie
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Apr 21, 2013, 03:41:23 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Apr 21, 2013, 12:31:07 AM
Quote from: Remonster on Apr 21, 2013, 12:28:45 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Apr 21, 2013, 12:02:40 AM
TLW
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgallery.allwomenstalk.com%2FMovies%2F2011%2F02%2F9-books-that-did-not-make-great-movies%2F3_hannibal-rising_9-books-that-did-not-make-great-movies.jpg&hash=7d3e8aa93cebefbc440e7762cbd18c8b95a89556)


Spoiler
Just with dinosaurs.
[close]

Never read it. But now I kind of want to...

For a good laugh I presume?

If so, I can guarantee you that Hannibal Rising might be just as horrible as The Lost World. And that's really saying something.

Quote from: KiramidHead on Apr 20, 2013, 11:06:05 PM
Whether you prefer the TLW movie or book depends on what kinds of BS you're willing to put up with: Ian Malcolm not shutting up and acting like an ass, or a preachy, half-assed animal rights message with a gaggle of obnoxious protagonists.

The only thing worse than TLW novel was TLW: The movie

Well the thing is, there are certain parts of TLW I enjoy. That goes for both the novel and the film. I'm interested in Hannibal Rising because I have heard so many bad things about it, that I just want to experience it myself. For a laugh.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 21, 2013, 04:32:33 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Apr 20, 2013, 11:05:35 PM
TLW isn't quite in the same league as the first book in my opinion, but the review Aspie pulled up is a steaming pile of fresh rhino manure.
LoL, yes. Exactly.

Not to mention that bringing in an external review won't do much.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 21, 2013, 04:41:20 AM
http://johnwalterswriter.com/2012/12/02/book-review-the-lost-world-by-michael-crichton/ (http://johnwalterswriter.com/2012/12/02/book-review-the-lost-world-by-michael-crichton/)

QuoteOkay, let's get this over with right from the start:  there's no mistaking that "The Lost World" is an inferior book to its prequel.  It's exciting enough, and it has the obligatory man-eating dinosaurs, and it's set on a far-off island where hapless good-guy and bad-guy scientists and innocent kids flee from one catastrophe to another, but it's just a pastiche of one disaster after another without much in the way of plot to hold it all together.  Worse, it is broken up in parts with long boring expostulations on evolution and chaos theory which completely bring the action to a screeching, grinding halt.  It's readable, yes; I made it all the way through.  But then, once I start a book I hardly ever put it down until the end.  That's why I give great thought to what I want to read before I start.

One problem I had is that, as I did with the first book, consciously or unconsciously, as I read, I compared the book with the film.  The book "Jurassic Park" held up well to the film; it was different, but equally as exciting.  "The Lost World" book, however, besides being nothing like the Spielberg film, is nowhere near as kick-ass and exciting.  For example, at the end of the film a tyrannosaurus rex rampages through San Diego gulping down passers-by as it searches for its baby.  This is completely missing in the book; all the action in the book takes place on the island.  That's okay, as far as it goes, but somehow Crichton's prose doesn't come through as sharply as it did in the prequel.  The part where the trailer is being pushed over the cliff, for example, which in the movie is a spine-tingling Spielbergian thriller moment, is somehow pallid and ho-hum in the book.  In the film the team of bad-guy scientists, with their appropriately sinister agenda, are a fitting foil for the heroes; whereas, in the book the bad-guy team is pathetic – a couple of losers who never pose any sort of serious threat.

All right, you win a few, you lose a few.  That's the trouble with sequels – they often don't measure up to the original.  In this case, it's a shame, as the story has so much potential for us dinosaur lovers.  I'm a sucker for well-told tales of lost worlds and civilizations.  The original Arthur Conan Doyle novel "The Lost World" was a great piece of work; it was intelligent and absorbing and kept me enthralled even though the team didn't even make it to the plateau in the middle of the Amazon jungle until 100 pages had passed.  The Tarzan series was full of lost cities and peoples which Tarzan would discover in the middle of the jungle, or in the core of the Earth, and inevitably Tarzan would have to fight for his life against its denizens or their enemies.  The genre evokes wonder, mystery, thrills, and adventure.

In closing, I can't say I would recommend Crichton's "The Lost World".

It's not an isolated opinion. The World thinks The Lost World is shit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 21, 2013, 05:11:30 AM
One measly writer constitutes the entire world?

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 21, 2013, 05:17:21 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 21, 2013, 05:11:30 AM
One measly writer constitutes the entire world?
You're even arguing with trolling?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 21, 2013, 05:24:45 AM
I stopped reading when he said "One problem I had is that, as I did with the first book, consciously or unconsciously, as I read, I compared the book with the film."

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 21, 2013, 08:13:32 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F24.media.tumblr.com%2F2cd6ae90d9f45265bd7fdfbc1f9abb81%2Ftumblr_mkel59C3cN1rsiohpo1_1280.png&hash=18feb305a33de466a5f2be71b2ea1a24545bad90)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gazz on Apr 21, 2013, 10:06:52 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Apr 21, 2013, 12:02:40 AM
TLW
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgallery.allwomenstalk.com%2FMovies%2F2011%2F02%2F9-books-that-did-not-make-great-movies%2F3_hannibal-rising_9-books-that-did-not-make-great-movies.jpg&hash=7d3e8aa93cebefbc440e7762cbd18c8b95a89556)


Spoiler
Just with dinosaurs.
[close]

Not even close. TLW may not be a patch on Jurassic Park but it's really not that bad. I remembered being genuinely excited during a few of TLW's chapters whereas HR was a slog from first page to last.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 21, 2013, 03:26:21 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Apr 21, 2013, 05:17:21 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 21, 2013, 05:11:30 AM
One measly writer constitutes the entire world?
You're even arguing with trolling?

Sometimes I can't help myself. I know, I know :-[
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 21, 2013, 03:35:26 PM
Quote from: OmegaZilla on Apr 21, 2013, 08:13:32 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F24.media.tumblr.com%2F2cd6ae90d9f45265bd7fdfbc1f9abb81%2Ftumblr_mkel59C3cN1rsiohpo1_1280.png&hash=18feb305a33de466a5f2be71b2ea1a24545bad90)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimageshack.us%2Fscaled%2Flanding%2F580%2F2844104tim1.png&hash=975c35c331f584561f57daba6a2622f314e28d63)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 21, 2013, 03:46:25 PM
Ha, that entire scene got a solid laugh from the audience when I saw it recently. The look on Grant's face when Tim first approaches him is priceless.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Apr 21, 2013, 04:19:28 PM
My grandpa was laughing his head off there.

A few girls in the audience also screamed really, really loudly when the raptor comes out at Ellie through the pipes and wires, then again when it jumped at her through the wire fence. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 21, 2013, 06:06:33 PM
Oh yeah, that scene freaked the entire theatre out. The only scene scarier than that one to me was the Rex paddock scene. In IMAX 3D, it was positively horrifying.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 21, 2013, 07:42:53 PM
I was giggling like a school girl when all the preteens that had never seen the movie were screaming at those parts  :-X The part most screamed at was when the raptor snaps up to try to bite Lex. Holy crap it even got me too because of the 3D!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 02, 2013, 07:18:52 PM
 colintrevorrow Colin Trevorrow 25s
Nublar. #JP4 pic.twitter.com/OJaDagXvbF


(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BJSIL20CEAA-Y6q.jpg:large)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on May 02, 2013, 07:23:34 PM
So they're going back to Isla Nublar? Sweet. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 02, 2013, 07:26:23 PM
Unf. :)

all dat green. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on May 02, 2013, 07:28:43 PM
Seems like Jurassic Park 3D won't be shown in cinema over here. :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 02, 2013, 07:29:25 PM
nor here as well :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on May 02, 2013, 07:30:07 PM
Meh, that sucks guys :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on May 02, 2013, 07:30:22 PM
I heard the conversion was pretty crappy. You guys aren't missing much.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on May 02, 2013, 07:31:40 PM
I thought it was great, personally. Despite being post-conversion, it was the best 3D I've seen in a live action film.

And seeing the film in a theater for the first time was quite the experience.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 02, 2013, 07:44:06 PM
It was actually great. It complimented the movie well, which shocked me.

The only time it's noticeably awful is the final muldoon scene while he's trudging around in the jungle, right before he spots the decoy raptor.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on May 02, 2013, 08:04:00 PM
Quote from: First Blood on May 02, 2013, 07:30:22 PM
I heard the conversion was pretty crappy. You guys aren't missing much.

I just wanted to see it on the big screen. :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 02, 2013, 08:54:40 PM
Aw yea, back to Nublar! :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 02, 2013, 08:57:49 PM
Quote from: First Blood on May 02, 2013, 07:30:22 PM
I heard the conversion was pretty crappy. You guys aren't missing much.

It wasn't. Take it from a guy who saw it four times 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on May 02, 2013, 10:16:24 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 02, 2013, 08:57:49 PM
Quote from: First Blood on May 02, 2013, 07:30:22 PM
I heard the conversion was pretty crappy. You guys aren't missing much.

It wasn't. Take it from a guy who saw it four times 8)

Yea, it was great!  :) Best 3D I've seen I think.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on May 02, 2013, 11:33:37 PM
Going to be seeing it this Saturday (good thing it's still available :laugh:), can't wait to see the effect for myself. :)

And f**k yes, back to Nublar, love where this is going already! 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 03, 2013, 02:41:53 AM
I just went to see it in the big screen too. The 3d was a great though. I loved it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 03, 2013, 04:25:57 AM
Huge nostalgia trip inbound!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on May 05, 2013, 12:04:11 AM
I have a 3d tv, it was awesome!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on May 05, 2013, 05:04:00 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 02, 2013, 08:57:49 PM
Quote from: First Blood on May 02, 2013, 07:30:22 PM
I heard the conversion was pretty crappy. You guys aren't missing much.

It wasn't. Take it from a guy who saw it four times 8)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F24.media.tumblr.com%2F70152e12818724194226aa524e980fd0%2Ftumblr_mkag8j4aQS1r8l8eno1_500.gif&hash=11d0fb35638753ae0403def3bafc085cbc2f92b0)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on May 05, 2013, 09:54:01 PM
Quote from: First Blood on May 05, 2013, 05:04:00 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 02, 2013, 08:57:49 PM
Quote from: First Blood on May 02, 2013, 07:30:22 PM
I heard the conversion was pretty crappy. You guys aren't missing much.

It wasn't. Take it from a guy who saw it four times 8)
http://24.media.tumblr.com/70152e12818724194226aa524e980fd0/tumblr_mkag8j4aQS1r8l8eno1_500.gif
It wasn't crappy at all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 05, 2013, 10:25:53 PM
There's rumors of casting announcemts coming soon (probably next month)  since filming is set to start in July.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 05, 2013, 10:35:11 PM
Source?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 05, 2013, 10:37:21 PM
Me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on May 05, 2013, 10:41:20 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 05, 2013, 10:37:21 PM
Me.

Truly the most trustworthy of sources.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on May 06, 2013, 03:40:36 AM
That's what you get from "rumors"  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 06, 2013, 03:58:08 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 05, 2013, 10:37:21 PM
Me.

That response made me laugh  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 08, 2013, 04:40:31 AM
http://www.walkingwithdinosaurs.com/news/editorial/mike-taylor-what-we-want-from-jurassic-park-4/1/ (http://www.walkingwithdinosaurs.com/news/editorial/mike-taylor-what-we-want-from-jurassic-park-4/1/)

Interesting ideas but I think these would look silly on screen. Dinosaurs running amok en masse through the city?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on May 08, 2013, 05:07:07 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 08, 2013, 04:40:31 AM
http://www.walkingwithdinosaurs.com/news/editorial/mike-taylor-what-we-want-from-jurassic-park-4/1/ (http://www.walkingwithdinosaurs.com/news/editorial/mike-taylor-what-we-want-from-jurassic-park-4/1/)

Interesting ideas but I think these would look silly on screen. Dinosaurs running amok en masse through the city?

no.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 08, 2013, 05:24:22 AM
hmmm

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/62308 (http://www.aintitcool.com/node/62308)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on May 08, 2013, 05:57:46 AM
God I hope not
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 08, 2013, 07:13:13 AM
Quote from: ace3g on May 08, 2013, 05:24:22 AM
hmmm

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/62308 (http://www.aintitcool.com/node/62308)

FFS, what is it this time? More script changes?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 08, 2013, 07:55:29 AM
Dear f**k, NO!

EDIT: Still happening, just facing a small hiatus - http://www.jurassicpark4-movie.com/news/784 (http://www.jurassicpark4-movie.com/news/784)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 08, 2013, 08:58:26 AM
Well that's good news. I hope the end product isn't rushed to release, should these disagreements persist for a long time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 08, 2013, 09:13:33 AM
QuoteAccording to our source, Jurassic Park 4 is still in production, just on a temporary hiatus while there is a "restructuring of the guard", if you will. Not to worry however, as we are told that Colin Trevorrow is still directing the film and adds that the film will deliver on an EPIC scale. It is this "EPIC" demand by the studio however, which has lead to the current situation. It seems Universal wants to pull out all the stops and go above and beyond what they had initially set their goals to be. This has lead to a number of disagreements between those working on the project and the Studio, which has resulted in an overhaul within the film's production crew. No specifics however.

With regards to a few employees mentioning over Twitter that they were let go today - our source further assures us that those affected, and about 80% of JP4's Art Department, had most of their work for the project already done. So, the film has been moving forward at a steady rate and Universal has no plans to give up this late in development.

Regarding Jurassic Park 4's script, which was previously thought to be the cause of this potential breakdown, our source tells us that the script is NOT the issue. The script apparently, is fine. The only problems which have arisen, have come from within the film's developmental core.

So to sum it all up - Jurassic Park 4 is not dead, it's merely on hold while the studio sorts out a few things behind closed doors and comes to an agreement with those working on the project. This is not uncommon, just look at the RoboCop remake, which was initially scheduled for a 2013 release, but ended up getting postponed and pushed back to 2014, to cater to the Studio's requests.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 08, 2013, 10:09:47 AM
So Universal wants "EPIC" and the crew wants something not as extravagant. Please, oh good Christ let the crew win this. I don't even want to think about what Universal is gunning for.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 08, 2013, 10:13:22 AM
...what could "EPIC" mean in the jurassic park franchise? :P

genetically engineered smarter T-Rex's jumping down from choppers with large guns in their tiny hands?

Spoiler
Oh god, let that be true :P
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on May 08, 2013, 11:02:21 AM
Do you hear that, Mr Anderson? It is the sound of inevitability. It is the sound of five hundred armoured Tyrannosauruses besieging the White House.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 08, 2013, 12:04:22 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.themarysue.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F10%2FAngryKermit.gif&hash=0bfce32dbe81478f0272e1c5dad24863149932f4)
Getting real tired of their shit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on May 08, 2013, 01:23:48 PM
I still don't see them reaching that June release date. Especially with this going on. It will most likely be pushed to Fourth of July Weekend.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on May 08, 2013, 01:36:02 PM
June to July isn't that big a jump... If they continue having problems like this, I wouldn't be surprised if it gets pushed back to next summer. Of course, in 2015 then they have to worry about competing with The Avengers 2 and Star Wars Episode VII...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 08, 2013, 02:05:21 PM
Hey, I read all that chaos on JPIV last night as it was unfolding. I was so tired and panicked at the same time that I just said f**k it to the whole thing and went to sleep; hoping it was just all a bad dream.

As bad as this sounds, but as it was stated in that info from the link, I think if your services have already been given, but you try to push beyond your required services, then Hollywood will simply cut you from the team. They already got what they wanted (as stated in the article) why would they need to work with them on opposing ideas afterword?

I just hope this whole thing gets resolved before the planned start date of principle photography in July. If Godzilla handled their dispute quickly and non-effectively to filming schedule, why can't JPIV do the same?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on May 08, 2013, 02:16:14 PM
Because it is Universal. They fired Al Pacino for having "creative differences" with the director of Despicable Me 2. The studio wants full control and they have to learn to work with the actors/production team, etc  and allow them to express their given roles and portray them the way they feel works best. Not tell them "no, you can't do that. You have to do it MY way." That's bad workmanship right there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 08, 2013, 02:19:37 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on May 08, 2013, 02:16:14 PM
Because it is Universal. They fired Al Pacino for having "creative differences" with the director of Despicable Me 2. The studio wants full control and they have to learn to work with the actors/production team, etc  and allow them to express their given roles and portray them the way they feel works best. Not tell them "no, you can't do that. You have to do it MY way." That's bad workmanship right there.

Isn't 20th Century Fox a lot like that too?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on May 08, 2013, 02:30:51 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 08, 2013, 02:19:37 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on May 08, 2013, 02:16:14 PM
Because it is Universal. They fired Al Pacino for having "creative differences" with the director of Despicable Me 2. The studio wants full control and they have to learn to work with the actors/production team, etc  and allow them to express their given roles and portray them the way they feel works best. Not tell them "no, you can't do that. You have to do it MY way." That's bad workmanship right there.

Isn't 20th Century Fox a lot like that too?

Not really sure. Haven't heard much about them. I know that Disney is becoming that way with Marvel, and AMC Studios have had experiences like this in the past with always changing show runners for The walking Dead.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 08, 2013, 02:50:37 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on May 08, 2013, 02:30:51 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 08, 2013, 02:19:37 PM
Quote from: Rick Grimes on May 08, 2013, 02:16:14 PM
Because it is Universal. They fired Al Pacino for having "creative differences" with the director of Despicable Me 2. The studio wants full control and they have to learn to work with the actors/production team, etc  and allow them to express their given roles and portray them the way they feel works best. Not tell them "no, you can't do that. You have to do it MY way." That's bad workmanship right there.

Isn't 20th Century Fox a lot like that too?

Not really sure. Haven't heard much about them. I know that Disney is becoming that way with Marvel, and AMC Studios have had experiences like this in the past with always changing show runners for The walking Dead.

But that's not true. At least for now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 08, 2013, 04:40:19 PM
Dinosaurs running amok in a city? I bet it would be fun to watch, but not in my JP movies (exactly how i feel about World War Z ...). And I think it wouldn't come across to well with general audiences. Since the Lost World kinda did that at a lower scale.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 08, 2013, 05:42:46 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on May 08, 2013, 10:13:22 AM
...what could "EPIC" mean in the jurassic park franchise? :P

genetically engineered smarter T-Rex's jumping down from choppers with large guns in their tiny hands?

Spoiler
Oh god, let that be true :P
[close]

No, it means,

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbestofcalvinandhobbes.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F05%2Ff14.png&hash=ddd6bc29d6bc3c0ab145b685fbc32c2ef3759b5b)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on May 08, 2013, 05:51:08 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on May 08, 2013, 10:13:22 AM
...what could "EPIC" mean in the jurassic park franchise? :P

genetically engineered smarter T-Rex's jumping down from choppers with large guns in their tiny hands?

Spoiler
Oh god, let that be true :P
[close]

This is why Turok needs to be made. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 08, 2013, 06:13:01 PM
In other JP news, these lovelies arrived yesterday and today 8)

http://instagram.com/p/ZDx2J2FEsR/ (http://instagram.com/p/ZDx2J2FEsR/)

Who else remembers those cups?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 08, 2013, 06:23:34 PM
F**KING BITCH A** MOTHER F**KERS!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.universalpictures.com/news/Universal_Announcemenet_JP4_1.pdf (http://www.universalpictures.com/news/Universal_Announcemenet_JP4_1.pdf)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on May 08, 2013, 06:28:08 PM
I see this as good news. Would rather wait a while longer and get a decent movie, than have it be rushed and fail to entertain.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 08, 2013, 06:30:37 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 08, 2013, 06:23:34 PM
F**KING BITCH A** MOTHER F**KERS!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.universalpictures.com/news/Universal_Announcemenet_JP4_1.pdf (http://www.universalpictures.com/news/Universal_Announcemenet_JP4_1.pdf)

This is a good thing. As I mentioned earlier, if these hiccups persist, better to delay it a bit than rush it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on May 08, 2013, 06:52:38 PM
Curious how long the delay is. I can't imagine Universal wanting to pit Jurassic Park against GOTG and Star Wars in summer 2015. Hopefully it's just a couple months, like late augest-september.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on May 08, 2013, 06:54:49 PM
GOTG is 20114, actually. The next Avengers film is 2015, which will be even more of a problem for JPIV.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on May 08, 2013, 06:56:21 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 08, 2013, 06:13:01 PM
In other JP news, these lovelies arrived yesterday and today 8)

http://instagram.com/p/ZDx2J2FEsR/ (http://instagram.com/p/ZDx2J2FEsR/)

Who else remembers those cups?

Hah, I do. Being a picky eater I wouldn't eat anything more adventurous than fries, nuggets and doughnuts at McDonalds, so my parents would buy me happy meals just for the cups and eat all the horsemeat and processed sewage themselves. Did love those cups, though.

Did you go for the Stingray ones too? They had awesome little models on top if memory serves.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on May 08, 2013, 06:56:50 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on May 08, 2013, 06:54:49 PM
GOTG is 20114, actually.
Wow, that's quite the wait. I was expecting it to be released sooner, honestly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on May 08, 2013, 06:57:56 PM
Quote from: KNIGHT on May 08, 2013, 06:56:50 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on May 08, 2013, 06:54:49 PM
GOTG is 20114, actually.
Wow, that's quite the wait. I was expecting it to be released sooner, honestly.

Well, seeing as its set in space and whatnot, they figured they'd wait until we had heap space travel in order to save money on special effects ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on May 08, 2013, 07:00:19 PM
So JP 4 has been put on hold ?

sucks :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on May 08, 2013, 07:02:12 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on May 08, 2013, 06:54:49 PM
GOTG is 20114, actually. The next Avengers film is 2015, which will be even more of a problem for JPIV.

Oh I had no idea GOTG is coming out so soon! That's awesome  :D

But yeah, I can't wait to hear more about the delay. Hopefully Trevorrow will have something to say soon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 08, 2013, 07:07:54 PM
Definitely good news. We might be looking at a late 2014 release.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 08, 2013, 07:08:27 PM
I'm just so upset today.  So far, it's raining (guess we needed it though) JP4 has officially been delayed and some crew fired, some payment disputes between cheap ass Marvel/ Disney and Chris Hemsworth and Scarlett Johansson and above all, I really need to complete this out house perspective successfully. I hope everything turns around for the better SOON.

If anything, I hope the film is delayed only a couple months.  It's a summer blockbuster kind of film!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on May 08, 2013, 07:22:05 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 08, 2013, 06:23:34 PM
F**KING BITCH A** MOTHER F**KERS!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.universalpictures.com/news/Universal_Announcemenet_JP4_1.pdf (http://www.universalpictures.com/news/Universal_Announcemenet_JP4_1.pdf)

Sounds like good news to me. I knew they would never of reached that June 2014 release date without rushing production. They are better off taking their time in getting it right.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 08, 2013, 07:39:17 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on May 08, 2013, 06:56:21 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 08, 2013, 06:13:01 PM
In other JP news, these lovelies arrived yesterday and today 8)

http://instagram.com/p/ZDx2J2FEsR/ (http://instagram.com/p/ZDx2J2FEsR/)

Who else remembers those cups?

Hah, I do. Being a picky eater I wouldn't eat anything more adventurous than fries, nuggets and doughnuts at McDonalds, so my parents would buy me happy meals just for the cups and eat all the horsemeat and processed sewage themselves. Did love those cups, though.

Did you go for the Stingray ones too? They had awesome little models on top if memory serves.

Stingray ones? Not sure what you're referring to. And McDs serves donuts? When did this happen?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on May 08, 2013, 08:03:11 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on May 08, 2013, 07:07:54 PM
Definitely good news. We might be looking at a late 2014 release.

Or maybe 2015. They could release it June 2015 or late July 2015.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 08, 2013, 08:06:28 PM
UPDATE!

Alright, here are some updates that weren't able to surface before the (bad) news.  Updates concerning that the delay may happen and why and even casting updates!

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=36 (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=36)


Of course they want an actor from ROTPOTA.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 08, 2013, 08:09:09 PM
No news of a potential Goldblum and Neill reunion? GTFO.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 08, 2013, 08:14:31 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 08, 2013, 08:09:09 PM
No news of a potential Goldblum and Neill reunion? GTFO.

I want so badly for AT LEAST one of the original cast members to return.  If they don't go that route, they sure as hell better give Niell, Goldblum, Dern and even Attenborough a great cameo.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on May 08, 2013, 09:35:48 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 08, 2013, 07:39:17 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on May 08, 2013, 06:56:21 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 08, 2013, 06:13:01 PM
In other JP news, these lovelies arrived yesterday and today 8)

http://instagram.com/p/ZDx2J2FEsR/ (http://instagram.com/p/ZDx2J2FEsR/)

Who else remembers those cups?

Hah, I do. Being a picky eater I wouldn't eat anything more adventurous than fries, nuggets and doughnuts at McDonalds, so my parents would buy me happy meals just for the cups and eat all the horsemeat and processed sewage themselves. Did love those cups, though.

Did you go for the Stingray ones too? They had awesome little models on top if memory serves.

Stingray ones? Not sure what you're referring to. And McDs serves donuts? When did this happen?

You know, Stingray (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E06cNv55jTs#), one of Gerry Anderson's stable of puppet-thesped TV shows (just learned the genre term is Supermarionation. Seriously), alongside Thunderbirds, Captain Scarlet and Joe 90. Submarine adventures against evil fish people with a hot mute mermaid. It had a resurgence in the '90s, and the McDonalds cups followed.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg854.imageshack.us%2Fimg854%2F398%2Ft2ec16vhjike9qu3kisbrfu.jpg&hash=53f4672c7ee4c70d37233800594278cc26fe8a92)
That's the only image I could find, annoyingly. Anyway, the lids had various astounding unnatural powers, such as the ability to glow in the dark or when wet, and if I remember rightly the crab one opened up to reveal the interior in Mighty Max style (anyone remember Mighty Max? PLEASE tell me I'm not the only one who remembers Mighty Max. I'm already feeling weird geeking out about my childhood).

And yes, McDonalds serves chocolate doughnuts, since Aspie's ancestors chose the ecological niche to lurk under bridges and frighten passers by with their violently unpopular opinions... where are you from by the way, I was under the impression you were a fellow Briton.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on May 08, 2013, 09:55:18 PM
Very exited that they don't seem to rush it (we don't need another JP3) and actually want to deliver the perfect film (the release date Always looked unrealistic) but I really hope Bryce Dallas Howard and David Oyelowo will still play in it

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.biography.com%2Fimported%2Fimages%2FBiography%2FImages%2FProfiles%2FH%2FBryce-Dallas-Howard-485752-1-402.jpg&hash=4a09e65d401d102786128ff725186901b9e46409)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hdwallpapersarena.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F12%2Fggg2.jpg&hash=00ec524ee91f7d148bfb1b5b76f4cc14393dbb71)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 08, 2013, 09:56:02 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 08, 2013, 08:06:28 PM
UPDATE!

Alright, here are some updates that weren't able to surface before the (bad) news.  Updates concerning that the delay may happen and why and even casting updates!

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=36 (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=36)


Of course they want an actor from ROTPOTA.

I'm liking the casting. Howard is very underrated, and every movie could use at least one narf. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 08, 2013, 11:43:48 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on May 08, 2013, 09:35:48 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 08, 2013, 07:39:17 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on May 08, 2013, 06:56:21 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 08, 2013, 06:13:01 PM
In other JP news, these lovelies arrived yesterday and today 8)

http://instagram.com/p/ZDx2J2FEsR/ (http://instagram.com/p/ZDx2J2FEsR/)

Who else remembers those cups?

Hah, I do. Being a picky eater I wouldn't eat anything more adventurous than fries, nuggets and doughnuts at McDonalds, so my parents would buy me happy meals just for the cups and eat all the horsemeat and processed sewage themselves. Did love those cups, though.

Did you go for the Stingray ones too? They had awesome little models on top if memory serves.

Stingray ones? Not sure what you're referring to. And McDs serves donuts? When did this happen?

You know, Stingray (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E06cNv55jTs#), one of Gerry Anderson's stable of puppet-thesped TV shows (just learned the genre term is Supermarionation. Seriously), alongside Thunderbirds, Captain Scarlet and Joe 90. Submarine adventures against evil fish people with a hot mute mermaid. It had a resurgence in the '90s, and the McDonalds cups followed.
http://img854.imageshack.us/img854/398/t2ec16vhjike9qu3kisbrfu.jpg
That's the only image I could find, annoyingly. Anyway, the lids had various astounding unnatural powers, such as the ability to glow in the dark or when wet, and if I remember rightly the crab one opened up to reveal the interior in Mighty Max style (anyone remember Mighty Max? PLEASE tell me I'm not the only one who remembers Mighty Max. I'm already feeling weird geeking out about my childhood).

And yes, McDonalds serves chocolate doughnuts, since Aspie's ancestors chose the ecological niche to lurk under bridges and frighten passers by with their violently unpopular opinions... where are you from by the way, I was under the impression you were a fellow Briton.

Never heard of Stingray till now.

I'm the British's offspring: Canadian. Our McDs do not serve donuts. I go to Tim Horton's for that 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on May 09, 2013, 05:50:14 AM
I was watching Toy Hunter on Travel Channel, and this guy found JP toys much like the ones you post Doom. They sold for $300.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 09, 2013, 05:56:07 AM
Do you remember which ones they were?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on May 09, 2013, 05:57:10 AM
One was a Stegosaurus, the other was a Young T-Rex.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jptoys.com%2Ftoy-database%2Fjurassic-park%2Fjurassic-park-series-1%2Fdinosaurs%2Fstegosaurus%2Fimg%2Fstegosaurus.jpg&hash=b213dc908f6fff0097b55aeac0a2ae302739a8a8)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.finalfrontiertoys.com%2Fmedia%2Fcatalog%2Fproduct%2Fcache%2F1%2Fimage%2F5e06319eda06f020e43594a9c230972d%2FJ%2FP%2FJP_T-Rex_MIP.jpg&hash=42da51c689c707dce67737a20497d4419eef8cf8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 09, 2013, 06:02:02 AM
If they were MIB I can see why. I wouldn't pay more than $80 though for the Stegosaurus. Which, ironically, I didn't. Mine only cost about that, grand total.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on May 09, 2013, 09:41:05 AM
I paid $25 for the Stego and 30 for the Rex Jr a month ago, so happy with all the Original JP toys I got recently :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 09, 2013, 04:22:55 PM
QuoteColin Trevorrow ‏@colintrevorrow

There is no friction. @UniversalPics is giving us time to make the movie you deserve. Keep telling me what you see. We're all directing JP4.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 09, 2013, 06:17:02 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 08, 2013, 05:42:46 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on May 08, 2013, 10:13:22 AM
...what could "EPIC" mean in the jurassic park franchise? :P

genetically engineered smarter T-Rex's jumping down from choppers with large guns in their tiny hands?

Spoiler
Oh god, let that be true :P
[close]

No, it means,

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbestofcalvinandhobbes.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F05%2Ff14.png&hash=ddd6bc29d6bc3c0ab145b685fbc32c2ef3759b5b)

;D Love Calvin and Hobbes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 09, 2013, 06:51:05 PM
The close-up of the Rex followed by the wider shot is just hysterical.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 09, 2013, 09:08:06 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on May 09, 2013, 04:22:55 PM
QuoteColin Trevorrow ‏@colintrevorrow

There is no friction. @UniversalPics is giving us time to make the movie you deserve. Keep telling me what you see. We're all directing JP4.

That's good that he cares a lot about the fans.  I'm just still worried about how much the film is delayed.

In other news, another filming location may have been leaked....

http://www.jurassicpark4-movie.com/community/forums/topic/24979 (http://www.jurassicpark4-movie.com/community/forums/topic/24979)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 10, 2013, 02:53:55 AM
Costa Rica makes perfect sense since that's where the film is supposed to happen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 10, 2013, 01:11:24 PM
 :(

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=38 (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=38)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 10, 2013, 01:51:50 PM
Trevorrow seems pretty confident, dunno how much truth there's to this rumor...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on May 10, 2013, 01:53:48 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 10, 2013, 01:11:24 PM
:(

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=38 (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=38)


Just axe this movie already.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 10, 2013, 03:28:24 PM
Quote from: Aspie on May 10, 2013, 01:53:48 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 10, 2013, 01:11:24 PM
:(

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=38 (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=38)


Just axe this movie already.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1.kym-cdn.com%2Fphotos%2Fimages%2Fnewsfeed%2F000%2F232%2F114%2Fe39.png&hash=d78e4a8b4e6894980960082fb9cf72ca40c9889c)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on May 10, 2013, 03:32:38 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 10, 2013, 01:11:24 PM
:(

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=38 (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=38)

Says the guy that directed The Lost World and Indiana Jones 4
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 10, 2013, 03:56:13 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 10, 2013, 01:11:24 PM
:(

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=38 (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=38)

FFS, if he wants raptors motorcycles and human-dino hybrids...I am so done.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 10, 2013, 04:18:41 PM
There were no human dino hybrids or dinos with guns on the John Sayles script :P

What it did have was a bunch of slightly genetically engineered deinonychus being trained as a (actually quite logical) improvement on "attack dogs" by a corporation. :P
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_dog (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_dog)

Anyway, i dont give too much credence to the Spielberg rumour :P At least i hope it's not true. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 10, 2013, 04:26:05 PM
Damn it. I thought we might finally get JP 4 this time with no bulls***. Poor gullible me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on May 10, 2013, 07:13:46 PM
Damn, let's just hope this does more good than bad. ::) :P :'(

Quote from: Aspie on May 10, 2013, 01:53:48 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 10, 2013, 01:11:24 PM
:(

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=38 (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=38)


Just axe this movie already.

shadup. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 10, 2013, 07:23:17 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on May 10, 2013, 07:13:46 PM
Damn, let's just hope this does more good than bad. ::) :P :'(

Quote from: Aspie on May 10, 2013, 01:53:48 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 10, 2013, 01:11:24 PM
:(

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=38 (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=38)


Just axe this movie already.

shadup. :P

He meant hand all the raptors and friends axes ::) He sounds like a scriptwriter already  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 10, 2013, 08:04:48 PM
There have been multiple Twitter updates from producer Frank Marshal and Colin Trevorrow himself reassuring fans that they aren't scrapping everything.  They just need a little more time piecing together what they have.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on May 10, 2013, 10:41:27 PM
Must feel like Damage Control Central over at Universal right now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 10, 2013, 10:45:09 PM
Still not as much of a clusterf**k as Phil Tippet's mishandling of the dinosaurs in the first film :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on May 10, 2013, 10:51:45 PM
At least they found Sam Jackson's dramatic arm.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on May 11, 2013, 02:07:00 AM
Godammit Universal, get your shit together!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 11, 2013, 02:07:33 AM
Quote from: TJ Doc on May 10, 2013, 10:51:45 PM
At least they found Sam Jackson's dramatic arm.

And what an amazing arm it is.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 11, 2013, 04:47:28 AM
So I saw this again tonight for the fifth time (!) and speaking of Phil Tippet, I have to wonder. Was the Velociraptor hatchling stop-motion? I swear it looks that way in a few shots.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 11, 2013, 04:49:03 AM
No, full size animatronic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 11, 2013, 04:51:12 AM
Ah I see. So what exactly was Phil Tippet's job in this film?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 11, 2013, 05:13:33 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 11, 2013, 04:51:12 AM
Ah I see. So what exactly was Phil Tippet's job in this film?

They tracked the movements that he created with his stop motion marquettes through computers and used the recorded movements for the marquette's digital counterpart.  Basically, he was the dinosaur performance supervisor.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 12, 2013, 05:44:15 AM
Thanks! Also, I bought these today, check 'em out; near complete set of the newly released JP toys.

http://instagram.com/p/ZMIk1glEhe/ (http://instagram.com/p/ZMIk1glEhe/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 12, 2013, 08:39:26 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 12, 2013, 05:44:15 AM
Thanks! Also, I bought these today, check 'em out; near complete set of the newly released JP toys.

http://instagram.com/p/ZMIk1glEhe/ (http://instagram.com/p/ZMIk1glEhe/)

I like how the JP logo is JP3 style but with the T-Rex instead. Dat Allosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 12, 2013, 08:54:18 AM
The big ones are quite nice. I do still miss Kenner's big rubber designs though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 12, 2013, 09:05:10 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 12, 2013, 08:54:18 AM
The big ones are quite nice.
That's what she said.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 12, 2013, 09:09:45 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on May 12, 2013, 09:05:10 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 12, 2013, 08:54:18 AM
The big ones are quite nice.
That's what she said.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ftarynhough.com%2Fpictures%2Fbrendan%2520fraiser%2520retard.gif&hash=a7620ca50f350693b3e67936ce855154c05bb565)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rick Grimes on May 12, 2013, 02:57:53 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 11, 2013, 04:51:12 AM
Ah I see. So what exactly was Phil Tippet's job in this film?
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ultimatetop10s.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F03%2FDinosaur_Supervisor_Phil_Fail.jpg&hash=085735ff650d66081b38069ba5073bae0cfd3246)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on May 12, 2013, 09:54:54 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 12, 2013, 08:54:18 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 12, 2013, 09:09:45 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on May 12, 2013, 09:05:10 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 12, 2013, 08:54:18 AM
The big ones are quite nice.
That's what she said.
http://tarynhough.com/pictures/brendan%20fraiser%20retard.gif
I do still miss Kenner's big rubber designs though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 13, 2013, 03:08:25 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on May 12, 2013, 08:39:26 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 12, 2013, 05:44:15 AM
Thanks! Also, I bought these today, check 'em out; near complete set of the newly released JP toys.

http://instagram.com/p/ZMIk1glEhe/ (http://instagram.com/p/ZMIk1glEhe/)

I like how the JP logo is JP3 style but with the T-Rex instead. Dat Allosaurus.

Speaking of logo, you guys think this will be new logo used for JP IV?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 13, 2013, 03:18:24 AM
Hope so, to compensate for all that anxiety we just went through.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 13, 2013, 03:20:44 AM
I'd rather see them use the original one. This new logo just feels off. I don't like that it's a hybrid of the original and JP 3 design like xeno-kaname mentioned.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 13, 2013, 04:09:01 AM
I like it, but i definitely don't want it used for the movie. I just like a little variety every once in a while.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on May 13, 2013, 12:37:22 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on May 08, 2013, 10:13:22 AM
...what could "EPIC" mean in the jurassic park franchise? :P

genetically engineered smarter T-Rex's jumping down from choppers with large guns in their tiny hands?

Spoiler
Oh god, let that be true :P
[close]

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.herpy.net%2Fgallery%2Fdata%2Fmedia%2F69%2FSexual_Tyrannosaurus_by_thatDMan.jpg&hash=1c2232ab9c50d365d0a410ec079f0dfa084ed9e1)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 13, 2013, 05:13:28 PM
A god damned sexual Tyranossaurus!  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 21, 2013, 11:01:28 PM
Might have turned into a reboot?

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=80000 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=80000)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightlord on May 21, 2013, 11:07:27 PM
Dumbest thing they could do, I hope he's wrong.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 21, 2013, 11:10:50 PM
....argh.  :-X
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on May 21, 2013, 11:18:12 PM
I think that Sem Neil wasn't speaking literally, but they do have to do something really new to capture a new audience and please the old
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on May 21, 2013, 11:53:14 PM
The way I see things, there are two kinds of reboots. In continuity, and out of continuity. Predators is an in continuity reboot of the Predator franchise; it takes place in the same universe but it spins off in its own direction while reimagining and reinterpreting concepts from the original films. The Amazing Spider-Man is an out of continuity reboot of Raimi's Spider-Man trilogy; it uses the same characters in an entirely separate story and completely reinvents the world from the ground up.

I see Jurassic Park IV being more of a Predators than a The Amazing Spider-Man.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 22, 2013, 12:34:01 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on May 21, 2013, 11:53:14 PM
The way I see things, there are two kinds of reboots. In continuity, and out of continuity. Predators is an in continuity reboot of the Predator franchise; it takes place in the same universe but it spins off in its own direction while reimagining and reinterpreting concepts from the original films. The Amazing Spider-Man is an out of continuity reboot of Raimi's Spider-Man trilogy; it uses the same characters in an entirely separate story and completely reinvents the world from the ground up.

I see Jurassic Park IV being more of a Predators than a The Amazing Spider-Man.

This.

I do hope for a reboot some day. Not so soon, but some day. But the R rated reboot that i want will never happen...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 22, 2013, 02:47:53 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on May 21, 2013, 11:53:14 PM
The way I see things, there are two kinds of reboots. In continuity, and out of continuity. Predators is an in continuity reboot of the Predator franchise; it takes place in the same universe but it spins off in its own direction while reimagining and reinterpreting concepts from the original films. The Amazing Spider-Man is an out of continuity reboot of Raimi's Spider-Man trilogy; it uses the same characters in an entirely separate story and completely reinvents the world from the ground up.

I see Jurassic Park IV being more of a Predators than a The Amazing Spider-Man.

Good analysis. I'm not against the idea of rebooting the series in Predators fashion because let's be honest guys. What possible fourth reason could humans come up with to return an island infested with dinosaurs?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on May 22, 2013, 03:14:43 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 22, 2013, 02:47:53 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on May 21, 2013, 11:53:14 PM
The way I see things, there are two kinds of reboots. In continuity, and out of continuity. Predators is an in continuity reboot of the Predator franchise; it takes place in the same universe but it spins off in its own direction while reimagining and reinterpreting concepts from the original films. The Amazing Spider-Man is an out of continuity reboot of Raimi's Spider-Man trilogy; it uses the same characters in an entirely separate story and completely reinvents the world from the ground up.

I see Jurassic Park IV being more of a Predators than a The Amazing Spider-Man.

Good analysis. I'm not against the idea of rebooting the series in Predators fashion because let's be honest guys. What possible fourth reason could humans come up with to return an island infested with dinosaurs?
For the lulz?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 22, 2013, 03:17:25 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 22, 2013, 02:47:53 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on May 21, 2013, 11:53:14 PM
The way I see things, there are two kinds of reboots. In continuity, and out of continuity. Predators is an in continuity reboot of the Predator franchise; it takes place in the same universe but it spins off in its own direction while reimagining and reinterpreting concepts from the original films. The Amazing Spider-Man is an out of continuity reboot of Raimi's Spider-Man trilogy; it uses the same characters in an entirely separate story and completely reinvents the world from the ground up.

I see Jurassic Park IV being more of a Predators than a The Amazing Spider-Man.

Good analysis. I'm not against the idea of rebooting the series in Predators fashion because let's be honest guys. What possible fourth reason could humans come up with to return an island infested with dinosaurs?

Man vs Wild: Isla Nublar
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on May 22, 2013, 04:12:57 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on May 22, 2013, 03:17:25 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 22, 2013, 02:47:53 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on May 21, 2013, 11:53:14 PM
The way I see things, there are two kinds of reboots. In continuity, and out of continuity. Predators is an in continuity reboot of the Predator franchise; it takes place in the same universe but it spins off in its own direction while reimagining and reinterpreting concepts from the original films. The Amazing Spider-Man is an out of continuity reboot of Raimi's Spider-Man trilogy; it uses the same characters in an entirely separate story and completely reinvents the world from the ground up.

I see Jurassic Park IV being more of a Predators than a The Amazing Spider-Man.

Good analysis. I'm not against the idea of rebooting the series in Predators fashion because let's be honest guys. What possible fourth reason could humans come up with to return an island infested with dinosaurs?

Man vs Wild: Isla Nublar

A reality tv show....


Naked Castaways, except with dinos.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 22, 2013, 04:14:53 AM
With the dinos-as-hounds-of-war John Sayle's script in mind... read this:

http://io9.com/when-pets-get-drafted-the-bizarre-history-of-animal-so-509118476 (http://io9.com/when-pets-get-drafted-the-bizarre-history-of-animal-so-509118476)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 22, 2013, 04:27:10 AM
Animal cruelty at its finest <_<
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 22, 2013, 02:15:05 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 22, 2013, 02:47:53 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on May 21, 2013, 11:53:14 PM
The way I see things, there are two kinds of reboots. In continuity, and out of continuity. Predators is an in continuity reboot of the Predator franchise; it takes place in the same universe but it spins off in its own direction while reimagining and reinterpreting concepts from the original films. The Amazing Spider-Man is an out of continuity reboot of Raimi's Spider-Man trilogy; it uses the same characters in an entirely separate story and completely reinvents the world from the ground up.

I see Jurassic Park IV being more of a Predators than a The Amazing Spider-Man.

Good analysis. I'm not against the idea of rebooting the series in Predators fashion because let's be honest guys. What possible fourth reason could humans come up with to return an island infested with dinosaurs?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjpencyclopedia%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F06%2Fbarbasol1.png&hash=98b859076b26a265ef5514d2a2556c6be91aee4c)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 22, 2013, 07:39:17 PM
The can would be far beyond obsolete by now. JP: The Game told us the best story revolving around it considering it takes place literally seconds after the chopper at the end of the movie leaves.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on May 22, 2013, 11:44:07 PM
Yes, and Im placing myself into this conversation before someone tries to deny the Videogame's canon story.



Nublar is torched. The barbasol can is gone. End of story.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 22, 2013, 11:49:15 PM
The video game isn't official canon as far as I know. But either way, the can is meaningless.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on May 22, 2013, 11:51:54 PM
People can choose to believe what they want, I.E. headcanon but I do believe that the Franchise-holders stated this story is part of the official timeline
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on May 23, 2013, 12:30:35 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 22, 2013, 11:49:15 PM
The video game isn't official canon as far as I know. But either way, the can is meaningless.

I think they did declare it official canon in the runup to release, but I'd be shocked if any film writer ever takes that on board.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 23, 2013, 01:36:46 AM
Yeah.  How many times have JP game adaptations steered far from the film's actual premise?  Plenty. I'm not taking what JP The Game did into consideration.  I want to see that story told on the big screen!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 23, 2013, 02:27:32 AM
It would mean retconning TLW I think though. It would confuse a lot of people.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on May 23, 2013, 03:57:55 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on May 22, 2013, 04:14:53 AM
With the dinos-as-hounds-of-war John Sayle's script in mind... read this:

http://io9.com/when-pets-get-drafted-the-bizarre-history-of-animal-so-509118476 (http://io9.com/when-pets-get-drafted-the-bizarre-history-of-animal-so-509118476)

I don't think I like this...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 23, 2013, 05:46:03 AM
Quote from: Gate on May 22, 2013, 11:44:07 PM
Nublar is torched.
Nope. It's the setting of JPIV.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 23, 2013, 06:06:59 AM
If they go back to Nublar, I want an armless Sam Jackson to walk out of the jungle with a club made from a dino leg. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 23, 2013, 06:43:02 AM
It'd be more badass if he made a robotic arm out of that egg handler automated thing, re-fitted to work with his nerve impulses.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 23, 2013, 09:02:22 AM
f**k a robotic arm, this ain't the future. I say give him a raptor arm. It's primal.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 23, 2013, 09:03:37 AM
ROBOT ARM  >:(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 23, 2013, 09:04:33 AM
RAPTOR ARM 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on May 23, 2013, 09:08:50 AM
Give him something like this.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi70.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fi89%2FFlixx76%2Fpirate_hook_for_sale.jpg&hash=d1dc817ccec32b256e1bb987a99264c6137fd78c)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on May 23, 2013, 10:17:27 AM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on May 23, 2013, 09:08:50 AM
Give him something like this.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi70.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fi89%2FFlixx76%2Fpirate_hook_for_sale.jpg&hash=d1dc817ccec32b256e1bb987a99264c6137fd78c)

I'm behind this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on May 23, 2013, 03:46:37 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 23, 2013, 06:43:02 AM
It'd be more badass if he made a robotic arm out of that egg handler automated thing, re-fitted to work with his nerve impulses.

f**k me Hilarious  :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: genius! 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 23, 2013, 04:58:39 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on May 23, 2013, 03:46:37 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on May 23, 2013, 06:43:02 AM
It'd be more badass if he made a robotic arm out of that egg handler automated thing, re-fitted to work with his nerve impulses.

f**k me Hilarious  :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: genius!

For sure   :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 23, 2013, 06:11:47 PM
For me, it's a toss-up between "robot arm" and "arm fashioned from head & neck of velociraptor."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on May 23, 2013, 06:14:09 PM
Robot raptor head arm.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 23, 2013, 06:15:27 PM
Quote from: KNIGHT on May 23, 2013, 06:14:09 PM
Robot raptor head arm.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F_60MjmkcrqZQ%2FTVCI8wXnXgI%2FAAAAAAAAADE%2FaJGyrQ3sX94%2Fs1600%2FsteinbrennerSeinfeld.jpg&hash=a27523637ad30bc47b7f9a05393062153e6d0bc0)
Hire this man!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 23, 2013, 06:18:17 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on May 23, 2013, 06:15:27 PM
Quote from: KNIGHT on May 23, 2013, 06:14:09 PM
Robot raptor head arm.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F_60MjmkcrqZQ%2FTVCI8wXnXgI%2FAAAAAAAAADE%2FaJGyrQ3sX94%2Fs1600%2FsteinbrennerSeinfeld.jpg&hash=a27523637ad30bc47b7f9a05393062153e6d0bc0)
Hire this man!
Oh, the nostalgia.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 23, 2013, 06:40:52 PM
These came in the mail today. Thought I'd share since one of them is thread-relevant.

http://instagram.com/p/ZqgqrMFEqj/ (http://instagram.com/p/ZqgqrMFEqj/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 24, 2013, 12:13:57 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on May 23, 2013, 06:15:27 PM
Quote from: KNIGHT on May 23, 2013, 06:14:09 PM
Robot raptor head arm.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F_60MjmkcrqZQ%2FTVCI8wXnXgI%2FAAAAAAAAADE%2FaJGyrQ3sX94%2Fs1600%2FsteinbrennerSeinfeld.jpg&hash=a27523637ad30bc47b7f9a05393062153e6d0bc0)
Hire this man!

Nah, chainsaw arm.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on May 24, 2013, 12:48:29 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on May 24, 2013, 12:13:57 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on May 23, 2013, 06:15:27 PM
Quote from: KNIGHT on May 23, 2013, 06:14:09 PM
Robot raptor head arm.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F_60MjmkcrqZQ%2FTVCI8wXnXgI%2FAAAAAAAAADE%2FaJGyrQ3sX94%2Fs1600%2FsteinbrennerSeinfeld.jpg&hash=a27523637ad30bc47b7f9a05393062153e6d0bc0)
Hire this man!

Nah, chainsaw arm.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FkX7Egei.gif&hash=c1ea56a21d158a4290f34e356043b514b4531fbf)


Robot Raptor-Headed Chainsaw Arm.

-Leaves room. We are done here-
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 04, 2013, 09:08:26 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F24.media.tumblr.com%2Facf5ef7b9702cf8c04448718d641f3e8%2Ftumblr_mnvmy6mq891recixmo1_500.jpg&hash=6354b2ef25047ac6146185e4f20dd8aad72ac0ea)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Jun 04, 2013, 09:18:42 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 04, 2013, 09:08:26 PM
http://24.media.tumblr.com/acf5ef7b9702cf8c04448718d641f3e8/tumblr_mnvmy6mq891recixmo1_500.jpg

Fuuuuck.

That is badass.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 04, 2013, 09:28:39 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 04, 2013, 09:08:26 PM
http://24.media.tumblr.com/acf5ef7b9702cf8c04448718d641f3e8/tumblr_mnvmy6mq891recixmo1_500.jpg

Oh man. That almost makes me want to love the film. Almost.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 04, 2013, 09:32:03 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 04, 2013, 09:08:26 PM
http://24.media.tumblr.com/acf5ef7b9702cf8c04448718d641f3e8/tumblr_mnvmy6mq891recixmo1_500.jpg

Good poster. Too bad the movie sucked.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jun 04, 2013, 11:13:58 PM
>mfw i'll always enjoy the f**k outta TLW and you can't do anything to stop me
>mfw i have no face because i'm too lazy right now
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 04, 2013, 11:49:29 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 04, 2013, 09:08:26 PM
http://24.media.tumblr.com/acf5ef7b9702cf8c04448718d641f3e8/tumblr_mnvmy6mq891recixmo1_500.jpg

I love this as much as I love the movie. Haters can kiss my ass.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jun 05, 2013, 12:01:42 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 04, 2013, 11:49:29 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 04, 2013, 09:08:26 PM
http://24.media.tumblr.com/acf5ef7b9702cf8c04448718d641f3e8/tumblr_mnvmy6mq891recixmo1_500.jpg

I love this as much as I love the movie. Haters can kiss my ass.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.myfacewhen.net%2Fuploads%2F5900-black-guy-thumbs-up.jpg&hash=bbf0f750beb7201c149703c71dcf405090acfd06)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jun 05, 2013, 12:03:27 AM
What DoomRulz said:

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 04, 2013, 11:49:29 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 04, 2013, 09:08:26 PM
http://24.media.tumblr.com/acf5ef7b9702cf8c04448718d641f3e8/tumblr_mnvmy6mq891recixmo1_500.jpg

I love this as much as I love the movie. Haters can kiss my ass.

What DoomRulz meant:

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 04, 2013, 11:49:29 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 04, 2013, 09:08:26 PM
http://24.media.tumblr.com/acf5ef7b9702cf8c04448718d641f3e8/tumblr_mnvmy6mq891recixmo1_500.jpg

I love this as much as I love the movie. Haters Aspie can kiss my ass.

:P :P :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 05, 2013, 12:37:56 AM
I'm sure there are others besides you. You're just more vocal ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 05, 2013, 12:38:05 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 04, 2013, 11:49:29 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 04, 2013, 09:08:26 PM
http://24.media.tumblr.com/acf5ef7b9702cf8c04448718d641f3e8/tumblr_mnvmy6mq891recixmo1_500.jpg

I love this as much as I love the movie. Haters can kiss my ass.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F24.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_m76u8ihbgP1rqfhi2o1_250.gif&hash=edcee3dfe17d976144a3423e667ee7c55b369238)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jun 05, 2013, 04:09:53 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 04, 2013, 11:49:29 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 04, 2013, 09:08:26 PM
http://24.media.tumblr.com/acf5ef7b9702cf8c04448718d641f3e8/tumblr_mnvmy6mq891recixmo1_500.jpg

I love this as much as I love the movie. Haters can kiss my ass.

Damn straight, bud.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 05, 2013, 05:37:07 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jun 05, 2013, 12:01:42 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 04, 2013, 11:49:29 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 04, 2013, 09:08:26 PM
http://24.media.tumblr.com/acf5ef7b9702cf8c04448718d641f3e8/tumblr_mnvmy6mq891recixmo1_500.jpg

I love this as much as I love the movie. Haters can kiss my ass.

http://www.myfacewhen.net/uploads/5900-black-guy-thumbs-up.jpg
Muh mega bros
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 05, 2013, 06:48:03 AM
Aspie, go back to the Things You don't get thread.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: War Wager on Jun 05, 2013, 08:12:47 AM
Found this one, same style:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.redesignrevolution.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F04%2FJurassicPark-Leonardo-Paciarotti-Di-Maggio-Behance.jpg&hash=fb18408cf02b3447de2ad033670ed27040aabafd)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 05, 2013, 08:16:41 AM
I feel the same 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 05, 2013, 02:38:04 PM
Quote from: War Wager on Jun 05, 2013, 08:12:47 AM
Found this one, same style:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.redesignrevolution.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F04%2FJurassicPark-Leonardo-Paciarotti-Di-Maggio-Behance.jpg&hash=fb18408cf02b3447de2ad033670ed27040aabafd)
Love it!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Jun 05, 2013, 03:41:39 PM
Great posters. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jun 05, 2013, 03:47:25 PM
Quote from: War Wager on Jun 05, 2013, 08:12:47 AM
Found this one, same style:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.redesignrevolution.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F04%2FJurassicPark-Leonardo-Paciarotti-Di-Maggio-Behance.jpg&hash=fb18408cf02b3447de2ad033670ed27040aabafd)

Yeah...that's...really...something :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 05, 2013, 06:11:49 PM
They are just beautiful.  Any chance for the 3rd?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DJ Pu$$yface on Jun 05, 2013, 06:56:41 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 05, 2013, 06:11:49 PM
They are just beautiful.  Any chance for the 3rd?

NO.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 05, 2013, 07:23:24 PM
I want them in real life. Love them too much.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 05, 2013, 11:38:09 PM
The 3rd film isn't that bad. I find it a lot better than Alien Resurrection or Predator 2
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 05, 2013, 11:58:33 PM
First off more news coming soon from Trevorrow....

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=40#comments (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=40#comments)

2nd....

There is rumor that JPIV will now have a Winter 2014 release date....

QuoteJurassic Park 4 @JurassicPark_4
Latest #JurassicPark4 rumor - new release date set for the Holidays, 2014. (Around December) Waiting on confirmation. #JP4
3:42 AM - 5 Jun 2013

   
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jun 06, 2013, 12:10:41 AM
That makes sense.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 06, 2013, 02:20:05 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 05, 2013, 11:38:09 PM
The 3rd film isn't that bad. I find it a lot better than Alien Resurrection or Predator 2

I'd choose JP 3 over A:R but definitely not P2. Predator 2 was fun at least. JP 3 wasn't.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 06, 2013, 03:24:45 AM
Alien Resurrection touched on the horrors of cloning and recreating a species, something that Jurassic Park III should have done.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Jun 06, 2013, 03:28:15 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 06, 2013, 03:24:45 AM
Alien Resurrection touched on the horrors of cloning and recreating a species, something that Jurassic Park III should have done.
But... isn't that what the entire series focused on...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jun 06, 2013, 03:37:46 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 06, 2013, 03:24:45 AM
Alien Resurrection touched on the horrors of cloning and recreating a species, something that Jurassic Park III should have done.

NA is being more forceful in is observations...


Spoiler
They grow up so fast.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F24.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_m5b4uhqaUs1r3yp6xo1_400.png&hash=ecdb31bee641e018644648e01d4a144d6b8bcc0c)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 06, 2013, 03:48:24 AM
Quote from: Cal427eb on Jun 06, 2013, 03:28:15 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 06, 2013, 03:24:45 AM
Alien Resurrection touched on the horrors of cloning and recreating a species, something that Jurassic Park III should have done.
But... isn't that what the entire series focused on...

Yes, it is. But I feel like JPIII completely dropped the ball on that. The first film delved into that very concept. Its been a while since I've seen the second, but from what I remember it somewhat explored the 'rights' that these animals had now that they exist again on our planet. JPIII never really touched on any of that stuff...they just rescued the kid and then got off the island.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Jun 06, 2013, 03:51:18 AM
You could just think of it as the continued consequences and horrors of creating them in the first place, but I guess I see what you mean.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jun 06, 2013, 03:51:19 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 06, 2013, 03:48:24 AM
Quote from: Cal427eb on Jun 06, 2013, 03:28:15 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 06, 2013, 03:24:45 AM
Alien Resurrection touched on the horrors of cloning and recreating a species, something that Jurassic Park III should have done.
But... isn't that what the entire series focused on...

Yes, it is. But I feel like JPIII completely dropped the ball on that. The first film delved into that very concept. Its been a while since I've seen the second, but from what I remember it somewhat explored the 'rights' that these animals had now that they exist again on our planet. JPIII never really touched on any of that stuff...they just rescued the kid and then got off the island.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstream1.gifsoup.com%2Fwebroot%2Fanimatedgifs%2F77734_o.gif&hash=080c4b8ac6b1de63d2bff832a499b2ac65ad69f6)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 06, 2013, 03:54:06 AM
Quote from: Cal427eb on Jun 06, 2013, 03:51:18 AM
You could just think of it as the continued consequences and horrors of creating them in the first place, but I guess I see what you mean.

I see where you're coming from. I guess I just wanted to see that a bit more in the forefront.

I do have great memories of seeing JPIII when I was younger, and can certainly find enjoyment in it if I decide to sit and watch it (the pterodactyl scene was especially good). Johnston was a great director for the film, he just didn't really have much to work with.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Jun 06, 2013, 04:02:28 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Jun 06, 2013, 03:51:19 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 06, 2013, 03:48:24 AM
Quote from: Cal427eb on Jun 06, 2013, 03:28:15 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 06, 2013, 03:24:45 AM
Alien Resurrection touched on the horrors of cloning and recreating a species, something that Jurassic Park III should have done.
But... isn't that what the entire series focused on...

Yes, it is. But I feel like JPIII completely dropped the ball on that. The first film delved into that very concept. Its been a while since I've seen the second, but from what I remember it somewhat explored the 'rights' that these animals had now that they exist again on our planet. JPIII never really touched on any of that stuff...they just rescued the kid and then got off the island.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstream1.gifsoup.com%2Fwebroot%2Fanimatedgifs%2F77734_o.gif&hash=080c4b8ac6b1de63d2bff832a499b2ac65ad69f6)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.postmodernsass.com%2Fblogger%2Fuploaded_images%2Fkermit-green-787275.jpg&hash=505989bb6b861a6c45c4fccc4535639f6dea266b)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 06, 2013, 04:06:52 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ft0.gstatic.com%2Fimages%3Fq%3Dtbn%3AANd9GcS3Ft9F_mUegTqpPR2hkRDFoht6bN_4XV1Cp40FgSqPBlExiejTrg&hash=2187acd3f40bd17dd08ccdb4dd7ea129f2a49e44)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jun 06, 2013, 04:07:11 AM
I raised NA well, but he grew up too soon Cal ;-;

Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 06, 2013, 04:06:52 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ft0.gstatic.com%2Fimages%3Fq%3Dtbn%3AANd9GcS3Ft9F_mUegTqpPR2hkRDFoht6bN_4XV1Cp40FgSqPBlExiejTrg&hash=2187acd3f40bd17dd08ccdb4dd7ea129f2a49e44)

wait, wtf
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 06, 2013, 04:07:44 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Jun 06, 2013, 04:07:11 AM
I raised NA well, but he grew up too soon Cal ;-;



(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-DOxEEYrQTeE%2FTgjE1XxvWFI%2FAAAAAAAAAAk%2FoSljpeMdaDw%2Fs1600%2Fkermit-and-vincent-price.jpg&hash=dc11e56ee20ec7eb39e2facd9f5e1f570fdaf40e)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jun 06, 2013, 04:10:45 AM
NVM

But it's progress :3
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jun 06, 2013, 04:21:22 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 06, 2013, 04:06:52 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ft0.gstatic.com%2Fimages%3Fq%3Dtbn%3AANd9GcS3Ft9F_mUegTqpPR2hkRDFoht6bN_4XV1Cp40FgSqPBlExiejTrg&hash=2187acd3f40bd17dd08ccdb4dd7ea129f2a49e44)

I actually find this kind of terrifying. Like, if I woke up in the middle of the night and saw that at my window, I'd probably curl up against my wall and rock back and forth.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jun 06, 2013, 04:26:21 AM
srsly :X
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Jun 06, 2013, 04:28:12 AM
I guess that means that NA was successful in his image selection.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 06, 2013, 04:29:17 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Femilyneedsstemcells.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F04%2FKermit4.jpg&hash=da237e5d058976341b499592edff7b238cf276dd)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 06, 2013, 04:30:06 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 06, 2013, 03:48:24 AM
Quote from: Cal427eb on Jun 06, 2013, 03:28:15 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 06, 2013, 03:24:45 AM
Alien Resurrection touched on the horrors of cloning and recreating a species, something that Jurassic Park III should have done.
But... isn't that what the entire series focused on...

Yes, it is. But I feel like JPIII completely dropped the ball on that. The first film delved into that very concept. Its been a while since I've seen the second, but from what I remember it somewhat explored the 'rights' that these animals had now that they exist again on our planet. JPIII never really touched on any of that stuff...they just rescued the kid and then got off the island.

Well, JPIII's idea was always "They've evolved" (in....8 years?)

So, I wouldn't go as far as saying it was all about the rescue mission.  I think the film was more focused on showing the dinos as being smarter, faster and meaner than ever before.  Our creations are now reaching our level of instinct.

Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 06, 2013, 04:06:52 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ft0.gstatic.com%2Fimages%3Fq%3Dtbn%3AANd9GcS3Ft9F_mUegTqpPR2hkRDFoht6bN_4XV1Cp40FgSqPBlExiejTrg&hash=2187acd3f40bd17dd08ccdb4dd7ea129f2a49e44)

Yeah, f**k that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jun 06, 2013, 04:30:44 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 06, 2013, 04:29:17 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Femilyneedsstemcells.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F04%2FKermit4.jpg&hash=da237e5d058976341b499592edff7b238cf276dd)
ok u can cut it out now NA :P :P :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 06, 2013, 04:33:04 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 06, 2013, 04:30:06 AM
So, I wouldn't go as far as saying it was all about the rescue mission.  I think the film was more focused on showing the dinos as being smarter, faster and meaner than ever before.  Our creations are now reaching our level of instinct.

Fair enough.

Anyways, thinking about it, once scene I remember really liking from the third one was when the group went into the InGen building and saw all of the destroyed test tubes and whatnot. Chilling stuff.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 06, 2013, 04:36:26 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 06, 2013, 04:33:04 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 06, 2013, 04:30:06 AM
So, I wouldn't go as far as saying it was all about the rescue mission.  I think the film was more focused on showing the dinos as being smarter, faster and meaner than ever before.  Our creations are now reaching our level of instinct.

Fair enough.

Anyways, thinking about it, once scene I remember really liking from the third one was when the group went into the InGen building and saw all of the destroyed test tubes and whatnot. Chilling stuff.

Don't forget.....


"The Bird Cage"

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages2.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20130528082311%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2Fc%2Fc8%2FPteranodon-silhouette.jpg&hash=4f0acd7d442c575b37cc24e64b8f93ea3eedb567)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jun 06, 2013, 04:37:25 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 06, 2013, 04:29:17 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Femilyneedsstemcells.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F04%2FKermit4.jpg&hash=da237e5d058976341b499592edff7b238cf276dd)

Yaaay normal Kermit. Not demonic, soul burning Kermit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 06, 2013, 04:41:00 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 06, 2013, 04:30:06 AM
So, I wouldn't go as far as saying it was all about the rescue mission.  I think the film was more focused on showing the dinos as being smarter, faster and meaner than ever before.  Our creations are now reaching our level of instinct.

It barely touched on even that. Only the raptors showed increased intelligence. You can't say that about the Spinosaurus or the Pteranodons because we've never seen them in action before let alone seen the former, period. The latter we only see for a few seconds on a branch at the end of TLW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jun 06, 2013, 04:43:11 AM
I liked JP3 more than the Lost World.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 06, 2013, 04:48:00 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Jun 06, 2013, 04:43:11 AM
I liked JP3 more than the Lost World.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1-ps.googleusercontent.com%2Fh%2Fwww.edupics.com%2FNx283xto-walk-out-the-door-t14565.jpg.pagespeed.ic.Twn-aP6MS3.jpg&hash=8728f3d4faa4c74366d1ecdf565e6196b9af5345)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jun 06, 2013, 04:49:45 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 06, 2013, 04:48:00 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Jun 06, 2013, 04:43:11 AM
I liked JP3 more than the Lost World.

http://1-ps.googleusercontent.com/h/www.edupics.com/Nx283xto-walk-out-the-door-t14565.jpg.pagespeed.ic.Twn-aP6MS3.jpg


ooooooo, what's behind that door?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 06, 2013, 04:54:33 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Jun 06, 2013, 04:49:45 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 06, 2013, 04:48:00 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Jun 06, 2013, 04:43:11 AM
I liked JP3 more than the Lost World.

http://1-ps.googleusercontent.com/h/www.edupics.com/Nx283xto-walk-out-the-door-t14565.jpg.pagespeed.ic.Twn-aP6MS3.jpg


ooooooo, what's behind that door?

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_m0te74D8Fm1qbo8yj.gif&hash=cc4495979823d107b71ac6ecf3d9e09cd7b1f819)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Jun 06, 2013, 04:58:15 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 06, 2013, 04:06:52 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ft0.gstatic.com%2Fimages%3Fq%3Dtbn%3AANd9GcS3Ft9F_mUegTqpPR2hkRDFoht6bN_4XV1Cp40FgSqPBlExiejTrg&hash=2187acd3f40bd17dd08ccdb4dd7ea129f2a49e44)

*enters thread*
*Sees image*

Lol, f**k dat. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master on Jun 06, 2013, 12:32:05 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Jun 06, 2013, 04:43:11 AM
I liked JP3 more than the Lost World.

I agree, me too. LW was stupid with extermally annoying girl. It had it`s moments: whole T-Rex sequences and in-gen arrival but still very sub-pair compared to JP.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Jun 06, 2013, 06:44:48 PM
the lost world blows jurassic park 3 out of the water.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Jun 06, 2013, 09:39:44 PM
Quote from: frenchfries on Jun 06, 2013, 06:44:48 PM
the lost world blows jurassic park 3 out of the water.

Dis guy.

This guy knows what he's talking about. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jun 06, 2013, 10:51:57 PM
That's not really an accomplishment. Most things blow JP3 out of the water.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PVTDukeMorrison on Jun 06, 2013, 10:54:30 PM
I didn't mind JP3  :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jun 06, 2013, 11:52:29 PM
Quote from: Master on Jun 06, 2013, 12:32:05 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Jun 06, 2013, 04:43:11 AM
I liked JP3 more than the Lost World.

I agree, me too. LW was stupid with extermally annoying girl. It had it`s moments: whole T-Rex sequences and in-gen arrival but still very sub-pair compared to JP.

yep yep yep yep
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 07, 2013, 12:09:28 AM
I liked that JP3 had a sense of humour, so I enjoyed it slightly more than TLW, despite its dearth of redeeming features in other respects. The latter did have a handful of masterful sequences in Spielberg's best style, but a lot of the behaviour (both animal and human), character development and lack of strong theme pissed me off.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 07, 2013, 01:53:51 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 06, 2013, 04:54:33 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Jun 06, 2013, 04:49:45 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 06, 2013, 04:48:00 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Jun 06, 2013, 04:43:11 AM
I liked JP3 more than the Lost World.

http://1-ps.googleusercontent.com/h/www.edupics.com/Nx283xto-walk-out-the-door-t14565.jpg.pagespeed.ic.Twn-aP6MS3.jpg


ooooooo, what's behind that door?

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_m0te74D8Fm1qbo8yj.gif&hash=cc4495979823d107b71ac6ecf3d9e09cd7b1f819)
[close]

PERFECT
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 07, 2013, 02:40:14 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jun 07, 2013, 12:09:28 AM
I liked that JP3 had a sense of humour, so I enjoyed it slightly more than TLW, despite its dearth of redeeming features in other respects. The latter did have a handful of masterful sequences in Spielberg's best style, but a lot of the behaviour (both animal and human), character development and lack of strong theme pissed me off.

The only amusing part of the film was Grant and Billy calling Kirby out on his lie about climbing K2 then grumbling about the lack of payment for the trip. The Ceratosaurus scene was unnecessary and felt forced.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Jun 07, 2013, 04:05:15 AM
I found TLW had a great sense of humor about it, at least in the first half. It got out of hand during the San Diego trip. The back and forth between Malcolm and Eddie is one of my favorite parts of the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 07, 2013, 04:41:28 AM
I will never understand the hate for the San Diego sequence. Sure the crew dying on the boat makes zero sense, but the T.Rex causing chaos in the streets was just plain cool.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jun 07, 2013, 04:42:53 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 07, 2013, 04:41:28 AM
I will never understand the hate for the San Diego sequence. Sure the crew dying on the boat makes zero sense, but the T.Rex causing chaos in the streets was just plain cool.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37OWL7AzvHo# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37OWL7AzvHo#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Jun 07, 2013, 05:24:11 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 07, 2013, 04:41:28 AM
I will never understand the hate for the San Diego sequence. Sure the crew dying on the boat makes zero sense, but the T.Rex causing chaos in the streets was just plain cool.

It took the movie in a direction i didn't really like. It was campy and goofy, while the rest of the movie was trying to be darker.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jun 07, 2013, 11:34:28 AM
I don't see how that part was campy or goofy. It was a homage to Conan Doyle's TLW and worked perfectly fine.
My two main gripes with the movie are the boat crew's death having zero explanation (plot or editing hole), the flying car in flames and the "gymnastics scene" during the raptor attack. The rest is a good non-pretentious blockbuster.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 07, 2013, 11:41:01 AM
It wasn't in any way called for, though. Spielberg there it in purely because he could.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 07, 2013, 11:52:20 AM
Absolutely not. It was set up the moment they said 'Taking dinosaurs off this island is the worst idea in the long, sad history of bad ideas'. You know it's not going to end well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jun 07, 2013, 11:55:54 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 07, 2013, 11:52:20 AM
Absolutely not. It was set up the moment they said 'Taking dinosaurs off this island is the worst idea in the long, sad history of bad ideas'. You know it's not going to end well.

This. The main plot is all about those c**ts trying to take the dinosaurs off the island. Not doing what they did would have been a missed chance IMO.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 07, 2013, 05:27:06 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Jun 07, 2013, 04:42:53 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 07, 2013, 04:41:28 AM
I will never understand the hate for the San Diego sequence. Sure the crew dying on the boat makes zero sense, but the T.Rex causing chaos in the streets was just plain cool.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37OWL7AzvHo# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37OWL7AzvHo#)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBnVthSzczI# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBnVthSzczI#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jun 07, 2013, 05:31:26 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jun 07, 2013, 11:34:28 AM
I don't see how that part was campy or goofy. It was a homage to Conan Doyle's TLW and worked perfectly fine.
My two main gripes with the movie are the boat crew's death having zero explanation (plot or editing hole), the flying car in flames and the "gymnastics scene" during the raptor attack. The rest is a good non-pretentious blockbuster.

This. Thisthisthisthisthisthisthisthisthisthisthisthisthis.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 07, 2013, 06:35:02 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jun 07, 2013, 11:34:28 AM
I don't see how that part was campy or goofy. It was a homage to Conan Doyle's TLW and worked perfectly fine.
My two main gripes with the movie are the boat crew's death having zero explanation (plot or editing hole), the flying car in flames and the "gymnastics scene" during the raptor attack. The rest is a good non-pretentious blockbuster.

Finally, someone else who gets it.

Agreed on your three gripes. The flying car just kinda came out of nowhere. At least the gymnastics scene had a little explanation given Kelly was an athlete in the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 08, 2013, 10:24:02 PM
JURASSIC PARK made its theatrical premiere 20 years ago today :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 08, 2013, 11:40:15 PM
Woooooo! Happy anniversary!  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 09, 2013, 06:41:34 AM
HAPPY 20TH!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Trunks on Jun 09, 2013, 06:56:28 AM
Quote from: frenchfries on Jun 06, 2013, 06:44:48 PM
the lost world blows jurassic park 3 out of the water.
This guy gets it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on Jun 09, 2013, 09:54:40 AM
I liked JP3.  It just needed another twenty minutes and have a proper climax instead of them just walking out into the beach and the Marines being there.

The Lost World only disappointed me because it wasn't anything like the book, which I feel is very superior to the film. 

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 09, 2013, 05:21:03 PM
Quote from: Kimarhi on Jun 09, 2013, 09:54:40 AM
I liked JP3.  It just needed another twenty minutes and have a proper climax instead of them just walking out into the beach and the Marines being there.

The Lost World only disappointed me because it wasn't anything like the book, which I feel is very superior to the film.

(https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/4254766592/h523D40DF/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jun 09, 2013, 07:24:23 PM
I would like JPIII a hell of a lot more if it wasn't for that bullshit fight between the T. Rex and the Spinosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 09, 2013, 10:06:31 PM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Jun 09, 2013, 07:24:23 PM
I would like JPIII a hell of a lot more if it wasn't for that bullshit fight between the T. Rex and the Spinosaurus.

Loved the fight. Not the outcome. The hell were they thinking?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 09, 2013, 10:09:05 PM
Oh NOES, your favorite dino isn't perfect and can't win every fight!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 09, 2013, 10:09:29 PM
Introduce new villian by making it face the older antagonist in order to present it as more of a threat.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 09, 2013, 10:11:04 PM
Okay, granted, I have my own issues with the fight, like the fact that it just kind of happens in the first act and has very little point to it. But still, the near Mary Sue-ness some people want from the T. rex is just silly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jun 09, 2013, 10:11:27 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 09, 2013, 10:09:05 PM
Oh NOES, your favorite dino isn't perfect and can't win every fight!

THE BUTTHURT IS OVER 9000!  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 09, 2013, 10:14:09 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 09, 2013, 10:09:29 PM
Introduce new villian by making it face the older antagonist in order to present it as more of a threat.

That was what made me dislike it right there. It was so painfully obvious. I don't have anything against the Spino and I don't necessarily prefer the T-Rex, but they should've known that little stunt wouldn't work. It slapped people right out of the movie to think about this silly thing they just saw.

Maybe if they would've left the battle for the end it wouldn't have been so bad. But it was so early in the movie everybody knew it was just to show that there's a new sheriff in town  ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jun 10, 2013, 12:02:16 AM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Jun 09, 2013, 07:24:23 PM
I would like JPIII a hell of a lot more if it wasn't for that bullshit fight between the T. Rex and the Spinosaurus.

The magic of the script, an effective way of bringing in a new antagonist is to somehow prove it's dominance over an older one.

But in reality I was taught Spinosaurus had a more "frail" body. Therefore the jaws of a T-rex should of probably made easier work of Spino than depicted. I'm no expert but I also think that while a Rex jaw is built for crushing bone I believe Spino's jaw was specialized for fish hunting.

But at the same. This is Jurassic Park, these "dinosaurs" are really "genetically engineered monsters", therefore there could be different possibilities (seems cheap I know). A "true" Velociraptor was really the size of something like a dog or turkey, Dilophosaurus didn't have frills or venom. That sort of thing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 10, 2013, 12:19:42 AM
What really bugged me about the fight was that two of the largest predators the world has ever known (plus the parents of rexy) have been sharing an island for years, and pick then to have a fight to the death? All they needed was a few humans dropped into the mix? C'mon...

But yeah, aside from the slim chances of anything short of Mechagodzilla surviving a Tyrannosaurus' bite to their neck (and the even slimmer chance of the confrontation going that far in the first place - equally matched predators of differing species tend to avoid each other), spino would be spending the rest of the movie curled up in a bush somewhere licking its wounds.

Ahh, movie logic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jun 10, 2013, 01:24:06 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 09, 2013, 10:09:05 PM
Oh NOES, your favorite dino isn't perfect and can't win every fight!

The Spino survived a bite to the neck from an animal that can apply up to six tons of bite force. Spino should have been a dead heap of flesh as soon as the Rex closed his jaws on it.

Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jun 09, 2013, 10:06:31 PM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Jun 09, 2013, 07:24:23 PM
I would like JPIII a hell of a lot more if it wasn't for that bullshit fight between the T. Rex and the Spinosaurus.

Loved the fight. Not the outcome. The hell were they thinking?

What would have been better is if the Spino managed to fight the Rex to a standstill before the Rex decides to leave, and at the very end of the movie while the Spino is attacking the boat, the Rex comes in and kills it, sort of like in the first one. Sure, it probably wouldn't happen in real life, but it would make more sense than the Spino surviving a bite to the neck from the Rex.

Quote from: Crazy Rich on Jun 10, 2013, 12:02:16 AM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Jun 09, 2013, 07:24:23 PM
I would like JPIII a hell of a lot more if it wasn't for that bullshit fight between the T. Rex and the Spinosaurus.

The magic of the script, an effective way of bringing in a new antagonist is to somehow prove it's dominance over an older one.

But in reality I was taught Spinosaurus had a more "frail" body. Therefore the jaws of a T-rex should of probably made easier work of Spino than depicted. I'm no expert but I also think that while a Rex jaw is built for crushing bone I believe Spino's jaw was specialized for fish hunting.

But at the same. This is Jurassic Park, these "dinosaurs" are really "genetically engineered monsters", therefore there could be different possibilities (seems cheap I know). A "true" Velociraptor was really the size of something like a dog or turkey, Dilophosaurus didn't have frills or venom. That sort of thing.

That could be true, but in this instance, I think it's pretty safe to assume that the Rex and Spino in JPIII are depicted as they were, ability wise, save for the bullshit bite.


I wouldn't care as much that the T.Rex lost the fight if the Spinosaurus did not survive a direct bite from the land animal with the most powerful bite ever.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 10, 2013, 02:31:07 AM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Jun 10, 2013, 01:24:06 AM

What would have been better is if the Spino managed to fight the Rex to a standstill before the Rex decides to leave, and at the very end of the movie while the Spino is attacking the boat, the Rex comes in and kills it, sort of like in the first one. Sure, it probably wouldn't happen in real life, but it would make more sense than the Spino surviving a bite to the neck

*Credits roll*
http://youtu.be/zcEMTIWW9zc?t=17s (http://youtu.be/zcEMTIWW9zc?t=17s)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 10, 2013, 02:40:12 AM
Sounds like more lame rex wanking to me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 10, 2013, 03:04:29 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 09, 2013, 10:09:29 PM
Introduce new villian by making it face the older antagonist in order to present it as more of a threat.

June 9?? Weird, the Wikipedia, Rotten Tomatoes, and IMDB pages says June 11. Hmm..

Anyway, yes, present a new threat I understand but the way it was handled was utter garbage because it completely threw off the pacing of the film. Imagine if Gwangi and the Styracosaurus fought when they first encountered each other once Gwangi corners the professor. It would have been grossly misplaced. The fight was perfectly placed when the cowboys think they have Gwangi under wraps because when Styra shows up, things go from bad to worse. The Rex/Spino fight would have been better if it had been saved for the water sequence at the end.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 10, 2013, 03:57:52 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 10, 2013, 03:04:29 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 09, 2013, 10:09:29 PM
Introduce new villian by making it face the older antagonist in order to present it as more of a threat.

June 9?? Weird, the Wikipedia, Rotten Tomatoes, and IMDB pages says June 11. Hmm..

Anyway, yes, present a new threat I understand but the way it was handled was utter garbage because it completely threw off the pacing of the film. Imagine if Gwangi and the Styracosaurus fought when they first encountered each other once Gwangi corners the professor. It would have been grossly misplaced. The fight was perfectly placed when the cowboys think they have Gwangi under wraps because when Styra shows up, things go from bad to worse. The Rex/Spino fight would have been better if it had been saved for the water sequence at the end.

I like the idea of saving it  for the end, but only if a rivalry had been established and been running throughout the film.

Spoiler
In order to trump expectations, both should die at the end, like a Mordred and Arthur type deal.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DJ Pu$$yface on Jun 10, 2013, 04:00:58 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 09, 2013, 10:09:05 PM
Oh NOES, your favorite dino isn't perfect and can't win every fight!

Not to a Spinosaurus no. Triceratops or Anklyosaurus? Extremely likely.

Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 10, 2013, 02:40:12 AM
Sounds like more lame rex wanking to me.

Or idiocy. Doesn't matter, we all know who would really win. ;)

The whole 'new antagonist vs old antagonist' play really annoys me.

I like how Google Chrome is trying to get me to spell Spinosaurus as Tyrannosaurus.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 10, 2013, 04:22:36 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 10, 2013, 03:57:52 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 10, 2013, 03:04:29 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 09, 2013, 10:09:29 PM
Introduce new villian by making it face the older antagonist in order to present it as more of a threat.

June 9?? Weird, the Wikipedia, Rotten Tomatoes, and IMDB pages says June 11. Hmm..

Anyway, yes, present a new threat I understand but the way it was handled was utter garbage because it completely threw off the pacing of the film. Imagine if Gwangi and the Styracosaurus fought when they first encountered each other once Gwangi corners the professor. It would have been grossly misplaced. The fight was perfectly placed when the cowboys think they have Gwangi under wraps because when Styra shows up, things go from bad to worse. The Rex/Spino fight would have been better if it had been saved for the water sequence at the end.

I like the idea of saving it  for the end, but only if a rivalry had been established and been running throughout the film.

Spoiler
In order to trump expectations, both should die at the end, like a Mordred and Arthur type deal.
[close]

All that would have been needed was a brief face-off, again, referencing the scene in TVoG. As for the end result, better still: no clear winner as the fight ends up off screen as it progresses.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jun 10, 2013, 04:36:37 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 10, 2013, 02:40:12 AM
Sounds like more lame rex wanking to me.

Would still be better than the Spino surviving getting it's neck bitten by a Rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jun 10, 2013, 05:05:00 AM
Wasn't JP 3 an Asylum Films production anyways?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Jun 10, 2013, 05:07:22 AM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Jun 10, 2013, 04:36:37 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 10, 2013, 02:40:12 AM
Sounds like more lame rex wanking to me.

Would still be better than the Spino surviving getting it's neck bitten by a Rex.
They should have had the T-Rex bite the spinosaurus in a different spot instead of the neck to make it more believable. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 10, 2013, 05:29:51 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 10, 2013, 03:04:29 AM
June 9?? Weird, the Wikipedia, Rotten Tomatoes, and IMDB pages says June 11. Hmm..
June 9 is the premiere (Washington DC)

June 11 date of release in the US.


First theatrical presentation is the former.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 10, 2013, 05:36:09 AM
I'm sticking with the U.S. release date, dammit.

And a bite to any other part of the Spino would have severely injured it to the point where the Rex would have easily finished it off so it wouldn't have made much difference.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 10, 2013, 06:46:12 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Jun 10, 2013, 05:05:00 AM
Wasn't JP 3 an Asylum Films production anyways?

Ok that got me laughing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 10, 2013, 09:08:10 AM
1.
For T-rex 'Wankers' as you say:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xIzRXvBXvY (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xIzRXvBXvY)
2.
WHY NOT CHARCHARODONTOSAURUS?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 11, 2013, 07:23:54 PM
I posted this on my Facebook wall and thought I'd share it with you guys.

Quote20 years ago, Jurassic Park was released in the U.S. It went on to become the highest-grossing film of all time (until Titanic was released), and with good reason. It showed to us the power and wonder that CG can inspire on the big screen and made moviegoers believe that dinosaurs still ruled the Earth. Let's take a moment and celebrate this cinematic masterpiece. Michael Crichton, Steven Spielberg, Sam Neill, Jeff Goldblum, Laura Dern...thanks for the memories guys.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jun 11, 2013, 07:52:51 PM
Quote from: Cal427eb on Jun 10, 2013, 05:07:22 AM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Jun 10, 2013, 04:36:37 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 10, 2013, 02:40:12 AM
Sounds like more lame rex wanking to me.

Would still be better than the Spino surviving getting it's neck bitten by a Rex.
They should have had the T-Rex bite the spinosaurus in a different spot instead of the neck to make it more believable.

Any other part that the Rex bit would have been severely crippled as well, but yeah, you have a point.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Jun 11, 2013, 09:51:23 PM
Well it would have at least had a plausible chance of surviving, since a bite to the neck should have meant instant death.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 11, 2013, 10:37:49 PM
Well, food would be the last thing on its mind afterwards, regardless of where it was bitten. Infection is the most common and deadly outcome of a fight between large predators, and it's essential they spend a lengthy period resting to give their injuries a chance to heal over. If spiny goes swimming, running and battering down fortified fences with open wounds and broken bones, it'll be dead within days.

The idea of the big showdown at the end of the movie makes much more sense, as it can provide a reason for the spino to cross into rex territory (if pursuing the humans thoughout the film, for whatever reason...), and takes into account that the winner would be out of commission for the rest of the film. Also ties back to the first film's predator showdown finale, and is probably a neater thing to build up to rather than open with.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 11, 2013, 11:52:28 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 11, 2013, 07:23:54 PM
I posted this on my Facebook wall and thought I'd share it with you guys.

Quote20 years ago, Jurassic Park was released in the U.S. It went on to become the highest-grossing film of all time (until Titanic was released), and with good reason. It showed to us the power and wonder that CG can inspire on the big screen and made moviegoers believe that dinosaurs still ruled the Earth. Let's take a moment and celebrate this cinematic masterpiece. Michael Crichton, Steven Spielberg, Sam Neill, Jeff Goldblum, Laura Dern...thanks for the memories guys.

Very nice, but you forgot to mention Stan Winston!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 12, 2013, 01:04:49 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 11, 2013, 11:52:28 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 11, 2013, 07:23:54 PM
I posted this on my Facebook wall and thought I'd share it with you guys.

Quote20 years ago, Jurassic Park was released in the U.S. It went on to become the highest-grossing film of all time (until Titanic was released), and with good reason. It showed to us the power and wonder that CG can inspire on the big screen and made moviegoers believe that dinosaurs still ruled the Earth. Let's take a moment and celebrate this cinematic masterpiece. Michael Crichton, Steven Spielberg, Sam Neill, Jeff Goldblum, Laura Dern...thanks for the memories guys.

Very nice, but you forgot to mention Stan Winston!

I did, didn't I :-[

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jun 12, 2013, 03:28:01 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jun 11, 2013, 10:37:49 PM
Well, food would be the last thing on its mind afterwards, regardless of where it was bitten. Infection is the most common and deadly outcome of a fight between large predators, and it's essential they spend a lengthy period resting to give their injuries a chance to heal over. If spiny goes swimming, running and battering down fortified fences with open wounds and broken bones, it'll be dead within days.

The idea of the big showdown at the end of the movie makes much more sense, as it can provide a reason for the spino to cross into rex territory (if pursuing the humans thoughout the film, for whatever reason...), and takes into account that the winner would be out of commission for the rest of the film. Also ties back to the first film's predator showdown finale, and is probably a neater thing to build up to rather than open with.

I can only imagine how disappointing that would be if that actually happened and the Rex still lost. Wouldn't seem fitting for Jurassic Park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 12, 2013, 04:02:17 AM
Like I said, have them kill each other in a glorious Arthurian style. Besides, there's probably more Rexes hanging around somewhere.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jun 12, 2013, 04:04:28 AM
That would work.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 12, 2013, 04:05:42 AM
Heh, it mainly stems from the fact that I really like the spino as a dinosaur.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jun 12, 2013, 04:05:53 AM
I wouldn't mind Jurassic Park 4 having a bit of an oceanic setting next time around. Even if it's for a little bit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 12, 2013, 04:09:46 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Jun 12, 2013, 04:05:53 AM
I wouldn't mind Jurassic Park 4 having a bit of an oceanic setting next time around. Even if it's for a little bit.

Aquaman vs the whatsit from Walking With Dinos. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jun 12, 2013, 04:11:01 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 12, 2013, 04:09:46 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Jun 12, 2013, 04:05:53 AM
I wouldn't mind Jurassic Park 4 having a bit of an oceanic setting next time around. Even if it's for a little bit.

Aquaman vs the whatsit from Walking With Dinos. :)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fskywalker.cochise.edu%2Fwellerr%2Fstudents%2Fmegalodon2%2Fproject_files%2Fimage009.jpg&hash=df9a0a08d9cea0550eb5e3468df049c041b5cee7)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 12, 2013, 05:04:10 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Jun 12, 2013, 04:11:01 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 12, 2013, 04:09:46 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Jun 12, 2013, 04:05:53 AM
I wouldn't mind Jurassic Park 4 having a bit of an oceanic setting next time around. Even if it's for a little bit.

Aquaman vs the whatsit from Walking With Dinos. :)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fskywalker.cochise.edu%2Fwellerr%2Fstudents%2Fmegalodon2%2Fproject_files%2Fimage009.jpg&hash=df9a0a08d9cea0550eb5e3468df049c041b5cee7)

Don't want that shit, thanks.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jun 12, 2013, 05:05:36 AM
yeah you do
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 12, 2013, 05:22:32 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 12, 2013, 04:02:17 AM
Like I said, have them kill each other in a glorious Arthurian style. Besides, there's probably more Rexes hanging around somewhere.

Well there shouldn't be considering the islands ecosystem could probably only support one predator of such size  ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jun 12, 2013, 06:47:00 AM
I think he meant the Leopleurodon...Not entirely sure I spelled that right...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 12, 2013, 09:14:42 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Jun 12, 2013, 04:11:01 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 12, 2013, 04:09:46 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Jun 12, 2013, 04:05:53 AM
I wouldn't mind Jurassic Park 4 having a bit of an oceanic setting next time around. Even if it's for a little bit.

Aquaman vs the whatsit from Walking With Dinos. :)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fskywalker.cochise.edu%2Fwellerr%2Fstudents%2Fmegalodon2%2Fproject_files%2Fimage009.jpg&hash=df9a0a08d9cea0550eb5e3468df049c041b5cee7)

Sharks never grew larger than a great white in the Mesozoic, the giant predator niches were locked down by the plesiosaurs (http://www.rareresource.com/photos/dinosaur-gallery/elasmosaurus.jpg), pliosaurs (http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2010/141/f/6/Liopleurodon_Ferox_by_Stalio.jpg), icthyosaurs (http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-u_GhPAWLJ6M/TtNO12OkYxI/AAAAAAAAEJU/ZmeCESjCuoY/s1600/Platypterygius_bannovkensis_by_Olorotitan.jpg) and mosasaurs (http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-eZSZpYyiWZo/URu8tJ6sV6I/AAAAAAAADhA/JE1leBODyiA/s1600/Tylosaurus_Archelon_FULL.jpg) - a bunch of lizards, basically. It's curious that giant size in the ocean has usually been the preserve of land creatures which reverted to marine living.
Megalodon evolved during the age of mammals, specifically to hunt whales in warm waters.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 12, 2013, 09:22:17 AM
God I love you so much Vertigo.

By the way. Tippett posted this in occasion of JP's 20th:

"Today's the 20th anniversary of Jurassic Park & there's somethin I wanna say. I'm sick of all this 'Phil Tippett Dinosaur Supervisor - You Had One Job to Do' stuff. Because it looks to me like they're all hitting their marks just fine. It's called ACTING. In all seriousness though, what a fantastic film. 20 years down, still holds up - the film, the vfx, the friendships. Cheers kids ... Thanks for keeping the classics kickin."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 12, 2013, 10:38:41 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 12, 2013, 09:22:17 AM
God I love you so much Vertigo.

:D The awesome is strong in you, also. I figure that the more I spout that kind of thing online, the less I'll need to bore my friends and family with it. It's a bit of a problem.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 12, 2013, 10:49:52 AM
That's virtually the main reason I began using online forum boards as well. Think it was around the time someone said to me, 'can you talk about things other than Tremors and Dinosaurs?' that I began searching for places for that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Jun 12, 2013, 01:08:48 PM
So next film happening ?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jun 12, 2013, 02:04:20 PM
Yes. They're just gonna move on to production later than expected.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jun 12, 2013, 05:25:24 PM
I wanna see that mutant T-rex grown up in the new movie. (That was the one that smelled the pile of feces when Dr. Grant and the goons were looking for the satellite phone and walked away) Or a revisit to Isla Numbar to fetch some of the embyros in the cryogenetic department (which I sincerely doubt survived) by the now grown up kids on demand by their now deceased grandfather. A cameo with Dr. Malcolm would be good too. I thought Spielberg showed some interest in producing this film, can anyone confirm or deny?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 12, 2013, 05:28:37 PM
That was Ceratosaurus, not a mutant T-Rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jun 12, 2013, 05:32:15 PM
Thank you for clarifying that information Nightmare Asylum!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 12, 2013, 09:33:33 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 12, 2013, 09:22:17 AM
God I love you so much Vertigo.

By the way. Tippett posted this in occasion of JP's 20th:

"Today's the 20th anniversary of Jurassic Park & there's somethin I wanna say. I'm sick of all this 'Phil Tippett Dinosaur Supervisor - You Had One Job to Do' stuff. Because it looks to me like they're all hitting their marks just fine. It's called ACTING. In all seriousness though, what a fantastic film. 20 years down, still holds up - the film, the vfx, the friendships. Cheers kids ... Thanks for keeping the classics kickin."

:laugh: Cool dude.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 12, 2013, 10:55:53 PM
Just posting these for your eyes and ears...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gjnMnytNiw (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gjnMnytNiw)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPqpwfXdYQU (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPqpwfXdYQU)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 13, 2013, 09:03:56 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jun 12, 2013, 05:22:32 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 12, 2013, 04:02:17 AM
Like I said, have them kill each other in a glorious Arthurian style. Besides, there's probably more Rexes hanging around somewhere.

Well there shouldn't be considering the islands ecosystem could probably only support one predator of such size  ::)

Not with enough prey running about. Site B didn't seem short on meat.

Quote from: Dovahkiin on Jun 12, 2013, 06:47:00 AM
I think he meant the Leopleurodon...Not entirely sure I spelled that right...

Liopleurodon :)

Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 12, 2013, 10:55:53 PM
Just posting these for your eyes and ears...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gjnMnytNiw (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gjnMnytNiw)

Oh hey! Did that guy from Universal ever get back to you??
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Jun 13, 2013, 10:00:50 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 12, 2013, 10:55:53 PM
Just posting these for your eyes and ears...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gjnMnytNiw (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gjnMnytNiw)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPqpwfXdYQU (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPqpwfXdYQU)
Nice videos man!  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 14, 2013, 09:50:19 PM
f**k....

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=43 (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=43)

But this is cool at least....

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/index.php?id=42#comments (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/index.php?id=42#comments)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 14, 2013, 10:38:24 PM
f**k.

But it does make sense...it's already getting pretty late in the year. Movies get produced faster nowadays but even if they were to start filming immediately, which they won't, it would have to be ready in a bit less than a year.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jun 14, 2013, 10:40:07 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jun 14, 2013, 10:38:24 PM
f**k.

But it does make sense...it's already getting pretty late in the year. Movies get produced faster nowadays but even if they were to start filming immediately, which they won't, it would have to be ready in a bit less than a year.

This.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 14, 2013, 11:37:00 PM
Just start filming the movie already!  Sheesh! 13 years isn't enough planning time?!? 

I don't get it, if he was signed on since last November, why the hell wasn't he working on his version of a JP4 story from the get-go instead of turning one in at the last second before production start.  I mean, did he even look at the already finished script that he was going to direct off of?  Isn't it restricted or something to turn in a completely radical version of an already existing screenplay that late?   I mean this film was scheduled to start filming- THIS MONTH. Trevorrow must really have Universal by the balls if he can have them push back ANOTHER FULL YEAR. 

I'd personally prefer a winter 2014 release at the latest, otherwise, JP4 is screwed with Episode 7 Avengers 2 Transformers 4 and whatever other fricken huge block busters out that summer.


I'm going now...to cry
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomorphine on Jun 15, 2013, 12:58:03 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 14, 2013, 11:37:00 PM
Just start filming the movie already!  Sheesh! 13 years isn't enough planning time?!?

It'll be ready when it's ready.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 15, 2013, 01:00:48 AM
When you gotta delay you gotta delay.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jun 15, 2013, 01:16:55 AM
I haven't been able to get worked up over this, and there's no point in doing so until production begins.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 15, 2013, 01:55:44 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 14, 2013, 11:37:00 PM
Just start filming the movie already!  Sheesh! 13 years isn't enough planning time?!? 

I don't get it, if he was signed on since last November, why the hell wasn't he working on his version of a JP4 story from the get-go instead of turning one in at the last second before production start.  I mean, did he even look at the already finished script that he was going to direct off of?  Isn't it restricted or something to turn in a completely radical version of an already existing screenplay that late?   I mean this film was scheduled to start filming- THIS MONTH. Trevorrow must really have Universal by the balls if he can have them push back ANOTHER FULL YEAR. 

I'd personally prefer a winter 2014 release at the latest, otherwise, JP4 is screwed with Episode 7 Avengers 2 Transformers 4 and whatever other fricken huge block busters out that summer.


I'm going now...to cry

I really doubt they'd go for a winter release. Summer is where it's at as far as they're concerned. They'd rather wait for Summer.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 15, 2013, 02:24:28 AM
Well, f**k them.

I'm having a bad day over all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jun 15, 2013, 02:40:21 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 12, 2013, 10:55:53 PM
Just posting these for your eyes and ears...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gjnMnytNiw (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gjnMnytNiw)

Watching this video made me want to watch the Carnosaur series again!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 15, 2013, 08:50:20 AM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Jun 15, 2013, 02:40:21 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 12, 2013, 10:55:53 PM
Just posting these for your eyes and ears...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gjnMnytNiw (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gjnMnytNiw)

Watching this video made me want to watch the Carnosaur series again!

Re-watched the first one not too long ago. Hadn't seen it in years. Oh the nostalgia.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jun 15, 2013, 09:16:39 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 14, 2013, 11:37:00 PM
Just start filming the movie already!  Sheesh! 13 years isn't enough planning time?!? 

I don't get it, if he was signed on since last November, why the hell wasn't he working on his version of a JP4 story from the get-go instead of turning one in at the last second before production start.  I mean, did he even look at the already finished script that he was going to direct off of?  Isn't it restricted or something to turn in a completely radical version of an already existing screenplay that late?   I mean this film was scheduled to start filming- THIS MONTH. Trevorrow must really have Universal by the balls if he can have them push back ANOTHER FULL YEAR. 

I'd personally prefer a winter 2014 release at the latest, otherwise, JP4 is screwed with Episode 7 Avengers 2 Transformers 4 and whatever other fricken huge block busters out that summer.


I'm going now...to cry

Whatever. I don't want to see a rushed film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 15, 2013, 10:03:13 AM
[UPDATE]

I slur my words, say "ya know..." too many times but here is my latest vlog about JP4.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyQnduM2DII#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyQnduM2DII#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Jun 16, 2013, 10:15:06 PM
your so handsome
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 16, 2013, 10:27:29 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 15, 2013, 02:24:28 AM
Well, f**k them.

I'm having a bad day over all.

I share your frustration. I've waited 13 years and with this new delay, I'm starting to lose hope. I honestly foresee Universal saying "f**k it" and pulling the plug. This film has become the DNF of the film industry.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 16, 2013, 11:31:53 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 15, 2013, 10:03:13 AM
[UPDATE]

I slur my words, say "ya know..." too many times but here is my latest vlog about JP4.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyQnduM2DII#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyQnduM2DII#ws)

Man, I completely agree with everything you said! You know, I usually make the distinction between remake and reboot, but I must admit I almost flipped when Sam Neil tweeted that. Guess I panicked because it's Jurassic Park  :P

Same thoughts about the R rated Jurassic Park. If only...but they wouldn't want to lose all that money that could be earned if it was PG-13  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 17, 2013, 04:21:22 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 16, 2013, 10:27:29 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 15, 2013, 02:24:28 AM
Well, f**k them.

I'm having a bad day over all.

I share your frustration. I've waited 13 years and with this new delay, I'm starting to lose hope. I honestly foresee Universal saying "f**k it" and pulling the plug. This film has become the DNF of the film industry.


This is the way I see it:  if they can finish the final draft of the new script by the end of the month and begin filming by next, they can still probably squeeze in an August 2014 release if they can learn to manage time effectively.  Start casting for the characters that have already been fleshed out in the screenplay and start working on digital and animatronic elements of the film that have no human actor interaction.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 17, 2013, 04:48:15 AM
If that's the case, then I'd rather they push the release date back, barring any further delays. I don't want a rushed film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 17, 2013, 07:12:08 AM
Universal won't pull the plug now.

JP3D was a huge success and it's still got to come out in the UK (August 23rd) which proves they'll be able to make a load of money off this franchise still.

JP4 will be made and we'll all be watching it within the next 3 years.

I foresee JP5 too, but I don't want to jump the gun just yet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jun 18, 2013, 06:05:04 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 14, 2013, 11:37:00 PM
JP4 is screwed with Episode 7 Avengers 2 Transformers 4 and whatever other fricken huge block busters out that summer.


Transformers 4 comes out next year, not 2015. I think June 2015 is safe now since there is nothing else coming out that month that will be major. Teaser poster BTW

http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=105599 (http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=105599)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jun 18, 2013, 07:15:29 PM
2015 release pretty much confirmed now: http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=105599 (http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=105599)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jun 18, 2013, 07:23:00 PM
Good news since they can take their time on filming and writing the script. It could be the best since the first movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 18, 2013, 07:29:53 PM
Well, whatever.  Wish they could have put a IV or something on their, unless they're giving it a more interesting title.

Another angle....

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BNENu6jCYAATokV.jpg:large)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jun 18, 2013, 08:30:39 PM
The logo is just a place holder.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 18, 2013, 08:48:39 PM
My excitement bar is still ridiculously high for this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 18, 2013, 09:04:28 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 18, 2013, 07:29:53 PM
Well, whatever.  Wish they could have put a IV or something on their, unless they're giving it a more interesting title.

Another angle....

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BNENu6jCYAATokV.jpg:large)

You know it actually looks pretty good here. The logo isn't horrible by any means, but I still prefer the original.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 18, 2013, 09:22:59 PM
If they keep the wooden look and combine it with the scratched worn down look of TLW logo they'll be on to a winner.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DJ Pu$$yface on Jun 18, 2013, 10:00:57 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 18, 2013, 07:29:53 PM
Well, whatever.  Wish they could have put a IV or something on their, unless they're giving it a more interesting title.

Another angle....

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BNENu6jCYAATokV.jpg:large)

Love it.

Better than the Spinosaurus one. Which was actually quite nice, but goddamnit Tyrannosaurus Rex is the iconic JP logo.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 18, 2013, 10:21:59 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 18, 2013, 07:29:53 PM
Well, whatever.  Wish they could have put a IV or something on their, unless they're giving it a more interesting title.

Another angle....

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BNENu6jCYAATokV.jpg:large)

They finally fixed it. At least, that's how it looks like to me.

As long as I can remember, I haven't been able to unsee something from the JP logo. You can see this from Requiem's avatar. I've always thought the Rex skeleton was looking at the "camera." The way the eye socket is shaped  makes me think it looks like an eye of it's own, and Ive never been able to erase that. It makes it look so silly and a bit cartoony. But they reshaped it slightly in the new logo and I can finally ignore the "eye" and just see the skeleton itself. I'm so relieved  :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 19, 2013, 12:54:13 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FQhJLRvP.jpg&hash=c0e3eea6e0673fb50d5a87a83c4ffb1cffcb31c9)


Not official.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 19, 2013, 03:03:58 AM
Don't like it. Blue doesn't work for Jurassic Park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 19, 2013, 03:16:07 AM
Holy hell Requiem that is one sweet signature!  :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 21, 2013, 04:03:54 PM
Thanks kaname  :)


Expect some big JP4 news very soon from JoBlo....

QuoteSandy JurassicPark14

JP4 EXCLUSIVE COMING TO US THANKS TO @joblocom STAY TUNED TO THEM

9:59am - 21 Jun 13

QuoteSandy JurassicPark14

JP4 news at noon EST on Joblo.com!!!!!

11:23am - 21 Jun 13
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 21, 2013, 04:21:17 PM
NEWS!

Spoiler
http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/exclusive-spoilers-awesome-details-on-the-story-and-concept-for-jurassic-park-iv
[close]

I don't know how to feel about this.

Now the "blue" JP4 logo makes more sense.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 21, 2013, 04:27:40 PM
Neither do I.

Is the dinosaur's name 'Caesar'? ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Jun 21, 2013, 04:30:14 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 21, 2013, 04:27:40 PMIs the dinosaur's name 'Caesar'? ::)
Does this mean... talking dinosaurs?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2F14e20789c6c228763e0fe141dbadbc1a%2Ftumblr_mlh5itpEM41rl52wjo1_500.gif&hash=c58bbe5bbdd8b1a1b23cda3390b81e4fc2a1d2c1)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 21, 2013, 04:32:12 PM
Tamed dinosaurs...eh.

The idea of the park being opened could potentially be interesting, though also quite hard to believe after what happened in the previous films.

Concept art's great, though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jun 21, 2013, 04:34:12 PM
So a fully operational Dinosaur Theme Park?

...Have they seen Jurassic Park? -Ba-dum-tsh-



In all seriousness, though, it could be interesting to see. However, using tamed Dinosaurs to fight off a dinosaur threat is the one part of it that I really just don't like. At all. It's stupid and it should feel stupid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 21, 2013, 04:34:28 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Jun 21, 2013, 04:30:14 PM
Does this mean... talking dinosaurs?
http://25.media.tumblr.com/14e20789c6c228763e0fe141dbadbc1a/tumblr_mlh5itpEM41rl52wjo1_500.gif
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcontent.hollywire.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fstyles%2Flarge%2Fpublic%2FJurassic-park-raptor.jpg&hash=7a59f0e1b4157b476a5efadb495ae28c05ce6eb3)
NOOO!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jun 21, 2013, 04:35:41 PM
I kind of like how that sounds. As for the tamed dinos, I don't think they'll be more tamed than your average zoo tiger...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jun 21, 2013, 04:36:32 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Jun 21, 2013, 04:30:14 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 21, 2013, 04:27:40 PMIs the dinosaur's name 'Caesar'? ::)
Does this mean... talking dinosaurs?

http://25.media.tumblr.com/14e20789c6c228763e0fe141dbadbc1a/tumblr_mlh5itpEM41rl52wjo1_500.gif
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi55.tinypic.com%2F2utiv0h.jpg&hash=255131819ec379d0d9495d422bef21bc966b1d36)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 21, 2013, 04:38:47 PM
I'm down for the lagoon idea etc but a new open park?

It's seems as if they were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, that they didn't stop to think if they should.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jun 21, 2013, 04:39:34 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 21, 2013, 04:38:47 PM
I'm down for the lagoon idea etc but a new open park?

It's seems as if they were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, that they didn't stop to think if they should.
Don't worry, it all works fine.

Until it doesn't.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jun 21, 2013, 04:40:23 PM
I've always wanted to see a JP film featuring a fully-functional park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 21, 2013, 04:40:44 PM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Jun 21, 2013, 04:39:34 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 21, 2013, 04:38:47 PM
I'm down for the lagoon idea etc but a new open park?

It's seems as if they were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, that they didn't stop to think if they should.
Don't worry, it all works fine.

Until it doesn't.

(again)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 21, 2013, 04:41:40 PM
Ian Malcolm absolutely has to be in this film, if only to run around yelling "I told you so!" when shit hits the fan.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jun 21, 2013, 04:42:05 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 21, 2013, 04:40:44 PM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Jun 21, 2013, 04:39:34 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 21, 2013, 04:38:47 PM
I'm down for the lagoon idea etc but a new open park?

It's seems as if they were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, that they didn't stop to think if they should.
Don't worry, it all works fine.

Until it doesn't.

(again)

Well, the park in the first one wasn't open to the public. This would be new.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 21, 2013, 04:42:18 PM
I'm more worried for the 'more intelligent dinosaur'....
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 21, 2013, 04:43:09 PM
After soaking it in a bit, I'm sure this concept will turn out fine on screen.  I HOPE!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 21, 2013, 04:43:53 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 21, 2013, 04:42:18 PM
I'm more worried for the 'more intelligent dinosaur'....

CHAOS THEORY

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdailygrindhouse.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F10%2Fjurassic-park-barney.jpg&hash=e77ed99fd10a7ee7f1c8f101008026ec6c137bdc)

"I told you so!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 21, 2013, 04:44:57 PM
Noooooo
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 21, 2013, 04:48:48 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_lvyfmldeW81qd96hso1_500.jpg&hash=1c240e24d701c102d6701039bba1ff970f3d884a)

"God creates dinosaurs. God destroys dinosaurs. God creates man. Man destroys God. Man creates dinosaurs. Man tames dinosaurs. Dinosaurs take mans' jobs. Man goes extinct. Dinosaurs create man."

All of this has happened before, and all of it will happen again...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 21, 2013, 04:49:34 PM
It's scarily sounding more and more like Alien: Ressurection.

"tame"
more "intelligent"
Underwater scenes...

:-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: War Wager on Jun 21, 2013, 04:52:25 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 21, 2013, 04:42:18 PM
I'm more worried for the 'more intelligent dinosaur'....
Oh gawd... they wouldn't...

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia2.firstshowing.net%2Ffirstshowing%2Fimg5%2Fjurassicpark4-abandoned-dinosaurart1-med.jpg&hash=b0441b7edb80247007f2575f296e53bfc7806c64)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jun 21, 2013, 04:55:27 PM
More intelligent and tamed aren't words that mean "human dinos" or "resurrection-ish aliens"... Have you f**kers never been to a zoo? I'm pretty sure we're not getting any "enhanced-mutant-dinos" crap. And those dinos probably won't be tamed more than your average tiger.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jun 21, 2013, 04:56:08 PM
I'm still hoping it's this.

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages4.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20130225172511%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2F6%2F60%2F18-Troodon.png&hash=82c501c41c23359d12b9723a3adaec50ac99460c)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Jun 21, 2013, 05:02:49 PM
Anyone else want to see a Dimetrodon in this movie?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 21, 2013, 05:04:54 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jun 21, 2013, 04:55:27 PM
More intelligent and tamed aren't words that mean "human dinos" or "resurrection-ish aliens"... Have you f**kers never been to a zoo? I'm pretty sure we're not getting any "enhanced-mutant-dinos" crap. And those dinos probably won't be tamed more than your average tiger.

You're right but I don't trust the film producers since I saw a raptor saying "ALAN."

In all fairness my only concern is that it'll be a rehash of the first. Like a remake with 4 slapped on the logo.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 21, 2013, 05:09:35 PM
You know I like the idea of a new park, it was the only way to reintroduce the franchise imho and it can set up new and better sequels. I also like the idea of a lagoon etc but tamed dinosaurs seems risky, but if they write it in a good way it could be great, no cheese please! And I want to see a lot of blood in this one ;-)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 21, 2013, 05:16:21 PM
I don't get why they're saying it's a "working park" in JP4? Jurassic Park featured a working park until Dennis screwed it up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 21, 2013, 05:21:11 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 21, 2013, 04:48:48 PM
All of this has happened before, and all of it will happen again...
!

Oh frak
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Jun 21, 2013, 05:25:44 PM
You know what... I'm totally down for this.

Yeah, you know what f**kin' a, bring it, f**king bring it on I'm totally f**king in.

Working park? Lagoon exhibit? Darker tone?

f**k yeah, I'm down. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jun 21, 2013, 05:34:19 PM
I'm not sure I want to see a "Tamed" T-Rex or raptors. I want them eating people damnit!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 21, 2013, 05:34:58 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Jun 21, 2013, 05:02:49 PM
Anyone else want to see a Dimetrodon in this movie?

Though they technically aren't dinosaurs, I would love to see one on screen. They were always one of my favorites when I was younger.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Jun 21, 2013, 05:35:15 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 21, 2013, 04:21:17 PM
NEWS!

Spoiler
http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/exclusive-spoilers-awesome-details-on-the-story-and-concept-for-jurassic-park-iv
[close]

I don't know how to feel about this.

Now the "blue" JP4 logo makes more sense.

Reads like a mix of Jaws 3 and Westworld.

Fitting.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2013, 05:36:32 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 21, 2013, 04:49:34 PM
It's scarily sounding more and more like Alien: Ressurection.

"tame"
more "intelligent"
Underwater scenes...

:-\

I'm concerned myself.

QuoteThat's right, folks, this will feature "tamed" dino's. In fact, our source indicated that the usually menacing Velociraptors (which will finally be muzzled, along with the T-Rex - until they're not) will actually be used to help fight the threat, - See more at: http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/exclusive-spoilers-awesome-details-on-the-story-and-concept-for-jurassic-park-iv#sthash.Gd9z1P2k.dpuf (http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/exclusive-spoilers-awesome-details-on-the-story-and-concept-for-jurassic-park-iv#sthash.Gd9z1P2k.dpuf)

dafuq did I just read. Are they going to move in squads, with the dinosaurs taking point? Also,

THERE'S NO SUCH THING AS AN AQUATIC DINOSAUR, FFS!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 21, 2013, 05:39:38 PM
Haha damn right DOOM!

Also...

Instead of a "new park" why isn't it a secret research facility where Paleontologists and other scientists study and debate over their findings, only to have things go wrong. I want a more scientific approach!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 21, 2013, 05:41:09 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 21, 2013, 05:39:38 PM
Instead of a "new park" why isn't it a secret research facility where Paleontologists and other scientists study and debate over their findings, only to have things go wrong. I want a more scientific approach!

Because then they'd have to do away with the whole 'tamed dinosaurs' and 'general public' parts that seem to be what the movie is going to focus on.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 21, 2013, 05:45:19 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F24.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_m2zkh7fQcT1qkremvo1_500.gif&hash=38be6e4b9ed16983094cc09eb0b5b1e5c72d5119)


Quote from: Dovahkiin on Jun 21, 2013, 05:34:19 PM
I'm not sure I want to see a "Tamed" T-Rex or raptors. I want them eating people damnit!!!

As much as I thoroughly LOVED Jurassic Park, the dinosaurs in the film were tame compared to the unrelenting, evisceration machines found within the pages of the book. PG-13 ... I get it. But I could use a little less Awe/Magic and a little more grit, danger, and alien creepiness from the dinosaurs this go around.

(I can't imagine anything will be tamed ... just 'locked down' and under control. They will free the old school Jurassic Park Dinosaurs to save themselves from the new ones. Chaos Theory to the rescue.)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 21, 2013, 05:45:38 PM
So in other words...

Jurassic Park 4: Ressurection in Westworld with Jaws 3.

No...no...NOOOO!!!!

Spoiler
I'm still highly excited for this mind ;)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 21, 2013, 05:47:59 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 21, 2013, 05:45:19 PM
Chaos Theory to the rescue.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg706.imageshack.us%2Fimg706%2F7006%2Fsigbatchainimavi.png&hash=1720a6c7e6e2d2452030b4f8740216e23f5d26b1)

"Nobody could've predicted that."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 21, 2013, 05:50:02 PM
Man I wanna get in front of my camera and record a fresh JP4 vlog. Tomorrow night people!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jun 21, 2013, 06:25:10 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 21, 2013, 05:45:19 PM
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2zkh7fQcT1qkremvo1_500.gif


Quote from: Dovahkiin on Jun 21, 2013, 05:34:19 PM
I'm not sure I want to see a "Tamed" T-Rex or raptors. I want them eating people damnit!!!

As much as I thoroughly LOVED Jurassic Park, the dinosaurs in the film were tame compared to the unrelenting, evisceration machines found within the pages of the book. PG-13 ... I get it. But I could use a little less Awe/Magic and a little more grit, danger, and alien creepiness from the dinosaurs this go around.

(I can't imagine anything will be tamed ... just 'locked down' and under control. They will free the old school Jurassic Park Dinosaurs to save themselves from the new ones. Chaos Theory to the rescue.)

Agreed. Still, I want the Tyannosaurus to make the comeback it deserves.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 21, 2013, 06:30:20 PM
I don't know how I feel about this. But I do have an idea as to what type of dinosaur it will be.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.wikia.com%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2Fe%2Feb%2FNew_threat_JP_Telltale.jpg&hash=368f11cf1a9fc2a12d096379be0da039947e8665)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jun 21, 2013, 06:38:07 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2013, 05:36:32 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 21, 2013, 04:49:34 PM
It's scarily sounding more and more like Alien: Ressurection.

"tame"
more "intelligent"
Underwater scenes...

:-\

I'm concerned myself.

QuoteThat's right, folks, this will feature "tamed" dino's. In fact, our source indicated that the usually menacing Velociraptors (which will finally be muzzled, along with the T-Rex - until they're not) will actually be used to help fight the threat, - See more at: http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/exclusive-spoilers-awesome-details-on-the-story-and-concept-for-jurassic-park-iv#sthash.Gd9z1P2k.dpuf (http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/exclusive-spoilers-awesome-details-on-the-story-and-concept-for-jurassic-park-iv#sthash.Gd9z1P2k.dpuf)

dafuq did I just read. Are they going to move in squads, with the dinosaurs taking point? Also,

THERE'S NO SUCH THING AS AN AQUATIC DINOSAUR, FFS!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lf_KrGP61uo# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lf_KrGP61uo#)




Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Jun 21, 2013, 06:43:53 PM
Calm down, dear.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jun 21, 2013, 06:48:21 PM
Behold this Domesticated Ferret Dinosaur:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-fm9n7jIcWmQ%2FUPDbtg66DeI%2FAAAAAAAAW-Q%2F7M3lqRHCkRU%2Fs1600%2F0004-jurassic-park-4-concept-art-6.jpg&hash=b4f79c67957446fbb8b10f4b2be44a1706a88e83)

(Available at your local PetCo. within the next few years.)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 21, 2013, 06:53:17 PM
Seeing as its part human, selling it (him?) at PetCo would ultimately be deemed as nothing short of slavery.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jun 21, 2013, 07:01:15 PM
lol, R.I.P. Jurassic Park 4. You never had a chance.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 21, 2013, 07:09:55 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Jun 21, 2013, 07:01:15 PM
lol, R.I.P. Jurassic Park 4.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.tumblr.com%2Ff97f82bed0eb98142e9c6afa0a4876a1%2Ftumblr_inline_mo1fqtnRl31qz4rgp.gif&hash=f648824be115f5b20c4c6af1d740ef2c58929dd4)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 21, 2013, 07:11:41 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Jun 21, 2013, 07:01:15 PM
lol, R.I.P. Jurassic Park 4. You never had a chance.

Still got two years until the film is out, none of this is set in stone. You just hate Jurassic Park :-*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 21, 2013, 08:14:25 PM
REST EASY MY FRIENDS!

UPDATE: Possible JURASSIC PARK 4 Plot Details Leak

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=81997 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/BatFreak/news/?a=81997)



Btw, what do ya'll think?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi374.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Foo183%2FJAROSHULK28%2FStarr_05041tdyTHTEH_zps06ab4e69.jpg&hash=05379a1ee698f5bba6a8b213c617786fa7ac8c1f)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2013, 08:20:22 PM
I actually like the sound of that. Getting large crowds of people in danger is a nice idea.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 21, 2013, 08:26:14 PM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 21, 2013, 06:30:20 PM
I don't know how I feel about this. But I do have an idea as to what type of dinosaur it will be.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.wikia.com%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2Fe%2Feb%2FNew_threat_JP_Telltale.jpg&hash=368f11cf1a9fc2a12d096379be0da039947e8665)

What made those dinosaurs 'special' other than looking like compys with glowing eyes action? (Sort of makes them easy to spot in the dark ... all those flashlights running around.)

I'm hoping for more creepy, bird like dinosaurs. Quick as f**k. Strange unblinking eyes. Erie ass vocalizations.  Silhouettes in the fog. 150 pound Birds of Prey unzipping humans and spilling their tubes before they can say "Stick Stupid." Crazy Owl like Dinosaurs that can turn their head all the way around and vomit up peoples bones. I want to see a dinosaur pin someone to the ground like an eagle does it's prey and pick them apart with rapid, jerking savagery.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 21, 2013, 08:29:40 PM
Did anybody read the update.  It was the old script that Trevorrow and Spielberg are now revising!  Hence the delay!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jun 21, 2013, 08:38:22 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 21, 2013, 08:26:14 PM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 21, 2013, 06:30:20 PM
I don't know how I feel about this. But I do have an idea as to what type of dinosaur it will be.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.wikia.com%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2Fe%2Feb%2FNew_threat_JP_Telltale.jpg&hash=368f11cf1a9fc2a12d096379be0da039947e8665)

What made those dinosaurs 'special' other than looking like compys with glowing eyes action? (Sort of makes them easy to spot in the dark ... all those flashlights running around.)



Well for one, this;
QuoteI'm hoping for more creepy, bird like dinosaurs. Quick as f**k. Strange unblinking eyes. Erie ass vocalizations.  Silhouettes in the fog.
Is pretty fitting of how they are shown in the game.

Also their bite being horribly poisonous and painful.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jun 21, 2013, 08:38:41 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 21, 2013, 07:11:41 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Jun 21, 2013, 07:01:15 PM
lol, R.I.P. Jurassic Park 4. You never had a chance.

Still got two years until the film is out, none of this is set in stone. You just hate Jurassic Park :-*

Unrelentingly so, especially after the last 2 movies and now this crud.  :-*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 21, 2013, 08:39:58 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2013, 08:20:22 PM
I actually like the sound of that. Getting large crowds of people in danger is a nice idea.

The Lost World covered that. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomorphine on Jun 21, 2013, 08:44:14 PM
I'm in two minds about this... And it feels weird, these days, to declare how I watched the original 'Jurassic Park' when it was on the big screen for the first time, but I was and can totally remember all the excited hype it spurred about genetic engineering.

I'm fearing that this won't be done right and might turn out rather predictable.

On the other hand, if that story is true? I honestly don't mind seeing muzzled Raptors and Rexes, provided they escape near the middle/end. And I honestly don't mind them being used to contain a much more threatening opponent. All of that, I can see having potential.

I'm fairly sure that the new one will either be an original, new hybridised creature, though. Or, failing that, one of those massive dragonflies or horrific arachnid creatures from ancient times. The best part about that 'King Kong' remake was the Skull Island stuff and I could see something along those lines working for this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 21, 2013, 08:50:22 PM
Quote from: Xenomorphine on Jun 21, 2013, 08:44:14 PM
I'm in two minds about this... And it feels weird, these days, to declare how I watched the original 'Jurassic Park' when it was on the big screen for the first time, but I was and can totally remember all the excited hype it spurred about genetic engineering.

I'm fearing that this won't be done right and might turn out rather predictable.

On the other hand, if that story is true? I honestly don't mind seeing muzzled Raptors and Rexes, provided they escape near the middle/end. And I honestly don't mind them being used to contain a much more threatening opponent. All of that, I can see having potential.

I'm fairly sure that the new one will either be an original, new hybridised creature, though. Or, failing that, one of those massive dragonflies or horrific arachnid creatures from ancient times. The best part about that 'King Kong' remake was the Skull Island stuff and I could see something along those lines working for this.
I never want to see man eating worms again. Christ that killed my as a kid
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jun 21, 2013, 08:56:29 PM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 21, 2013, 08:50:22 PM
Quote from: Xenomorphine on Jun 21, 2013, 08:44:14 PM
I'm in two minds about this... And it feels weird, these days, to declare how I watched the original 'Jurassic Park' when it was on the big screen for the first time, but I was and can totally remember all the excited hype it spurred about genetic engineering.

I'm fearing that this won't be done right and might turn out rather predictable.

On the other hand, if that story is true? I honestly don't mind seeing muzzled Raptors and Rexes, provided they escape near the middle/end. And I honestly don't mind them being used to contain a much more threatening opponent. All of that, I can see having potential.

I'm fairly sure that the new one will either be an original, new hybridised creature, though. Or, failing that, one of those massive dragonflies or horrific arachnid creatures from ancient times. The best part about that 'King Kong' remake was the Skull Island stuff and I could see something along those lines working for this.
I never want to see man eating worms again. Christ that killed my as a kid

...Tremors?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 21, 2013, 09:01:04 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Jun 21, 2013, 08:56:29 PM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 21, 2013, 08:50:22 PM
Quote from: Xenomorphine on Jun 21, 2013, 08:44:14 PM
I'm in two minds about this... And it feels weird, these days, to declare how I watched the original 'Jurassic Park' when it was on the big screen for the first time, but I was and can totally remember all the excited hype it spurred about genetic engineering.

I'm fearing that this won't be done right and might turn out rather predictable.

On the other hand, if that story is true? I honestly don't mind seeing muzzled Raptors and Rexes, provided they escape near the middle/end. And I honestly don't mind them being used to contain a much more threatening opponent. All of that, I can see having potential.

I'm fairly sure that the new one will either be an original, new hybridised creature, though. Or, failing that, one of those massive dragonflies or horrific arachnid creatures from ancient times. The best part about that 'King Kong' remake was the Skull Island stuff and I could see something along those lines working for this.
I never want to see man eating worms again. Christ that killed my as a kid

...Tremors?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hawtueu6mtI (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hawtueu6mtI)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jun 21, 2013, 09:02:40 PM
...wtf O_O
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 21, 2013, 09:07:19 PM
You haven't seen the '05 King Kong?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: livin_target on Jun 21, 2013, 09:08:29 PM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Jun 21, 2013, 08:38:22 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 21, 2013, 08:26:14 PM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 21, 2013, 06:30:20 PM
I don't know how I feel about this. But I do have an idea as to what type of dinosaur it will be.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.wikia.com%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2Fe%2Feb%2FNew_threat_JP_Telltale.jpg&hash=368f11cf1a9fc2a12d096379be0da039947e8665)

What made those dinosaurs 'special' other than looking like compys with glowing eyes action? (Sort of makes them easy to spot in the dark ... all those flashlights running around.)



Also their bite being horribly poisonous and painful.

Their nesting habits also took a little inspiration from some insects and our xenomorph friends.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jun 21, 2013, 09:18:10 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 21, 2013, 09:07:19 PM
You haven't seen the '05 King Kong?

...I don't remember if I have or not. I definitely haven't seen it recently.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2013, 09:29:43 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 21, 2013, 05:39:38 PM
Haha damn right DOOM!

Also...

Instead of a "new park" why isn't it a secret research facility where Paleontologists and other scientists study and debate over their findings, only to have things go wrong. I want a more scientific approach!

The general audience won't jive with "science" and "education". I hate to say it but people want to see dinosaurs rampaging. The scientific aspect of it, despite what was seen in Jurassic Park, is kept to a minimum in favour of action.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: livin_target on Jun 21, 2013, 10:32:52 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2013, 09:29:43 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 21, 2013, 05:39:38 PM
Haha damn right DOOM!

Also...

Instead of a "new park" why isn't it a secret research facility where Paleontologists and other scientists study and debate over their findings, only to have things go wrong. I want a more scientific approach!

The general audience won't jive with "science" and "education". I hate to say it but people want to see dinosaurs rampaging. The scientific aspect of it, despite what was seen in Jurassic Park, is kept to a minimum in favour of action.

I don't know. While I'm more in favour of a park setting over a more scientific one, I think the extra little bits in the original Jurassic Park to do with the science and the park itself helped pace it out very well and make it a better movie than it's sequels. However, the original did have a bit of an advantage over the other two because there was a question in everybody's minds of how they brought the dinosaurs back. By framing it in an interesting manner that didn't push disbelief too far, it created some quite memorable moments and allowed the audience to get more immersed in the film. Hell, as a kid, I remember wondering if they actually could do that if they found the right bug in some amber. At that young age, it not only entertained me but engaged my mind as well, even if it was a lot of pseudo science.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 21, 2013, 10:35:20 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 21, 2013, 05:45:19 PM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Jun 21, 2013, 05:34:19 PM
I'm not sure I want to see a "Tamed" T-Rex or raptors. I want them eating people damnit!!!

As much as I thoroughly LOVED Jurassic Park, the dinosaurs in the film were tame compared to the unrelenting, evisceration machines found within the pages of the book. PG-13 ... I get it. But I could use a little less Awe/Magic and a little more grit, danger, and alien creepiness from the dinosaurs this go around.

(I can't imagine anything will be tamed ... just 'locked down' and under control. They will free the old school Jurassic Park Dinosaurs to save themselves from the new ones. Chaos Theory to the rescue.)

Yes, we would all love a more violent Jurassic Park. And we probably will. The Pg-13 standards of today are much more loose than back in those days. You can get away with more violence, profanity, and sex in Pg-13 movies nowadays. Even in tv shows like Supernatural get away with so much blood, decapitation, torture, etc. We will definitely get more violence this time.

Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 21, 2013, 08:29:40 PM
Did anybody read the update.  It was the old script that Trevorrow and Spielberg are now revising!  Hence the delay!

That update had already been posted before. The conversation had already gravitated to this topic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: mez86 on Jun 21, 2013, 11:07:00 PM
I like the idea off a function park the beginning of the film should have a news report showing off the park with the tourist enjoying the rides seeing the dino in the enclosure and some dino performing showing off how amazing the park is.


not keen on the idea of ingen using the t-rex/raptors to help them fight the threat would much rather have them on the loose being a threat to the tourist has well and ingen sending in the army or own personal soldiers stationed at the park which ingen put in has a safety measure after the first incident at the park. see the soldiers go in to try secure the park and rescure the tourist/staff.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2013, 11:25:24 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jun 21, 2013, 10:35:20 PM
Yes, we would all love a more violent Jurassic Park. And we probably will. The Pg-13 standards of today are much more loose than back in those days. You can get away with more violence, profanity, and sex in Pg-13 movies nowadays. Even in tv shows like Supernatural get away with so much blood, decapitation, torture, etc. We will definitely get more violence this time.

Jurassic Park though is established as something the whole family can enjoy, though. As much as I too would love a more violent film, I think it's unlikely we'll such more violence than we did in the first film because people have a preconceived notion of what to expect.

Quote from: livin_target on Jun 21, 2013, 10:32:52 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2013, 09:29:43 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 21, 2013, 05:39:38 PM
Haha damn right DOOM!

Also...

Instead of a "new park" why isn't it a secret research facility where Paleontologists and other scientists study and debate over their findings, only to have things go wrong. I want a more scientific approach!

The general audience won't jive with "science" and "education". I hate to say it but people want to see dinosaurs rampaging. The scientific aspect of it, despite what was seen in Jurassic Park, is kept to a minimum in favour of action.

I don't know. While I'm more in favour of a park setting over a more scientific one, I think the extra little bits in the original Jurassic Park to do with the science and the park itself helped pace it out very well and make it a better movie than it's sequels. However, the original did have a bit of an advantage over the other two because there was a question in everybody's minds of how they brought the dinosaurs back. By framing it in an interesting manner that didn't push disbelief too far, it created some quite memorable moments and allowed the audience to get more immersed in the film. Hell, as a kid, I remember wondering if they actually could do that if they found the right bug in some amber. At that young age, it not only entertained me but engaged my mind as well, even if it was a lot of pseudo science.

Fair point.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 22, 2013, 02:43:02 AM
Quote from: mez86 on Jun 21, 2013, 11:07:00 PM
I like the idea off a function park the beginning of the film should have a news report showing off the park with the tourist enjoying the rides seeing the dino in the enclosure and some dino performing showing off how amazing the park is.


not keen on the idea of ingen using the t-rex/raptors to help them fight the threat would much rather have them on the loose being a threat to the tourist has well and ingen sending in the army or own personal soldiers stationed at the park which ingen put in has a safety measure after the first incident at the park. see the soldiers go in to try secure the park and rescure the tourist/staff.
I don't think they were serious about that. I think you're supposed to translate that as "The Raptors and the T-rex will have their fair share at giving it a run for its money or taking it in the ass from this new monster"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2013, 08:35:02 AM
I'm worried about this "new monster"

I hope its not a Neanderthal. :-\

Imagine.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DJ Pu$$yface on Jun 22, 2013, 08:35:52 AM
Tame Dinosaurs? The f*ck is this?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: livin_target on Jun 22, 2013, 09:21:23 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2013, 08:35:02 AM
I'm worried about this "new monster"

I hope its not a Neanderthal. :-\

Imagine.
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ftheinfosphere.org%2Fimages%2F7%2F7f%2FScary_door_3.jpg&hash=b4f5721fcab68c42749d224c9be075655e048818)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2013, 10:03:18 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fschlockwave.files.wordpress.com%2F2013%2F06%2Flandthattimeforgotnatives2.png&hash=9f2954d8e9f0b442f6c5b245c8789d1051032ffd)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 22, 2013, 10:49:19 AM
New Dinosaur. Not Monster.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2013, 10:55:25 AM
In all seriousness it'll probably be a Deinonychus or Utahraptor.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 22, 2013, 11:08:08 AM
You can't please everyone with this movie, so get ready for a reboot that actually sets up a good sequel this time round...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomorphine on Jun 22, 2013, 11:34:11 AM
Quote from: DJ Pu$$yface on Jun 22, 2013, 08:35:52 AM
Tame Dinosaurs? The f*ck is this?

I suspect it's more along the lines of 'coerced dinosaurs'. Electro-shock collars, etcetera... Then something happens to set them free (possibly a character who requires a big distraction).

Think 'Alien Resurrection'.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2013, 11:40:36 AM
Quote from: Xenomorphine on Jun 22, 2013, 11:34:11 AM
Think 'Alien Resurrection'.

*shudders*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jun 22, 2013, 12:03:51 PM
Quote from: Xenomorphine on Jun 22, 2013, 11:34:11 AM
Think 'Alien Resurrection'.

Nothanksimgood.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 22, 2013, 02:51:57 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2013, 10:55:25 AM
In all seriousness it'll probably be a Deinonychus or Utahraptor.

Tad redundant given that Jurassic Park's raptors are sized fairly closely to the latter.

A pack of Allosaurus might fit the "force to be reckoned with" bill, and fits into the recent(ish) hot topic of giant predators living and potentially hunting in groups. The debate's mostly concerning tyrannosaurids, but of course we already have one of those.

Regarding tame dinosaurs, many modern predators can react passively or even affectionately towards humans if hand reared from infancy by someone who knows what they're doing, and pretty much anything can be trained to perform basic tasks. For Jurassic Park though, it'd be a very fine line to tread and I'm not sure I'd want to see it.
The behaviour of the two baby raptors in the first book is very endearing though. It could be a touchstone for that plot element.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jun 22, 2013, 03:21:07 PM
4th installment in the franchise.
"Tamed" creatures.
More intelligent
Underwater Scenes (only with aquatic dinosaurs this time around) LOL

Yeah, this is a remake of Alien: Resurrection.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Jun 22, 2013, 03:29:13 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Jun 22, 2013, 03:21:07 PM
4th installment in the franchise.
"Tamed" creatures.
More intelligent
Underwater Scenes (only with aquatic dinosaurs reptiles this time around) LOL

Yeah, this is a remake of Alien: Resurrection.

Get your shit straight boy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Jun 22, 2013, 03:33:23 PM
I don't know how to feel about any of this
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 22, 2013, 03:42:08 PM
It certainly doesn't sound like it's been thought up by the ghost of Crichton. It seems they're making it because the series has been dormant for so long rather than because they've finally come up with a great story.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jun 22, 2013, 04:40:31 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Jun 22, 2013, 03:29:13 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Jun 22, 2013, 03:21:07 PM
4th installment in the franchise.
"Tamed" creatures.
More intelligent
Underwater Scenes (only with aquatic dinosaurs reptiles this time around) LOL

Yeah, this is a remake of Alien: Resurrection.

Get your shit straight boy.
'


YOU KNOW YOU WANT TO SEE AQUATIC RAPTORS
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jun 22, 2013, 04:52:26 PM
Well who doesn't?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jun 22, 2013, 04:55:38 PM
God damn it Spielberg
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slate.com%2Fcontent%2Fdam%2Fslate%2Farticles%2Fhealth_and_science%2Ffuture_tense%2F2011%2F12%2F111202_FUTURE_MichaelCrichton_EX.jpg.CROP.article250-medium.jpg&hash=8460ba911fa2b365228cad7a2a475e97038abe48)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: livin_target on Jun 22, 2013, 05:28:08 PM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Jun 22, 2013, 04:52:26 PM
Well who doesn't?

Scuba divers?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 22, 2013, 07:53:11 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jun 22, 2013, 03:42:08 PM
It certainly doesn't sound like it's been thought up by the ghost of Crichton. It seems they're making it because the series has been dormant for so long rather than because they've finally come up with a great story.
Decidedly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jun 22, 2013, 08:06:44 PM
I think we're implying way too much weird shit based on a couple of rumors which must be taken with a ton of salt...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Jun 22, 2013, 08:20:51 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Jun 22, 2013, 04:40:31 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Jun 22, 2013, 03:29:13 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Jun 22, 2013, 03:21:07 PM
4th installment in the franchise.
"Tamed" creatures.
More intelligent
Underwater Scenes (only with aquatic dinosaurs reptiles this time around) LOL

Yeah, this is a remake of Alien: Resurrection.

Get your shit straight boy.
'


YOU KNOW YOU WANT TO SEE AQUATIC RAPTORS

Nah.

I'll gladly take a mosasaur though. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomorphine on Jun 22, 2013, 09:31:01 PM
Where would they have got the DNA from? Mosquitoes don't exactly fly about under the waves. :)

If they have to do an aquatic monster movie, I'd rather see a legitimate adaptation of Peter Benchley's giant squid-themed novel, 'Beast'... I know there was a TV film, but a whole lot of stuff got changed around and the ending wasn't nearly as awesome as the one depicted in the book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 22, 2013, 09:40:52 PM
Quote from: Xenomorphine on Jun 22, 2013, 09:31:01 PM
Where would they have got the DNA from? Mosquitoes don't exactly fly about under the waves. :)

Maybe, in the 20 or so years since the first park failed, they 'grew' their own aquatic reptiles? Maybe they used dinosaurs (and frogs) as a starting point and then meddled with it to create those creatures.

Or maybe its just because the script says they're there :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jun 22, 2013, 09:45:18 PM
...maybe they find some sort of underwater parasite and extract the DNA that way :P




lol I have no idea what the hell they're gonna do.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 22, 2013, 09:51:56 PM
Quote from: Xenomorphine on Jun 22, 2013, 09:31:01 PM
Where would they have got the DNA from? Mosquitoes don't exactly fly about under the waves. :)

If they have to do an aquatic monster movie, I'd rather see a legitimate adaptation of Peter Benchley's giant squid-themed novel, 'Beast'... I know there was a TV film, but a whole lot of stuff got changed around and the ending wasn't nearly as awesome as the one depicted in the book.
The Telltale game's explanation for the Mosasaur is finding coastal mosquitos.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 22, 2013, 09:53:08 PM
They extracted part of the DNA from bones in the books.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 23, 2013, 12:17:03 AM
New JP4 vlog!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJ3_k1lsZ5c (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJ3_k1lsZ5c)

Thoughts?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 23, 2013, 08:15:34 PM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/998996_479416052138071_1387261191_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Jun 23, 2013, 08:28:16 PM
The movie is far from my favorite, but you cannot deny how good that Spinosaur looks. I'll be bummed if they didn't bring in Legacy effects for JP4.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 23, 2013, 08:30:09 PM
They f**kING HAVE to bring them back.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 23, 2013, 08:58:56 PM
I hate the spinosaurus, the animatronic moved so bad in JPIII
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 23, 2013, 09:19:44 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on Jun 23, 2013, 08:58:56 PM
I hate the spinosaurus, the animatronic moved so bad in JPIII

That's because you had your eyes shut.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 23, 2013, 10:35:44 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Jun 23, 2013, 08:28:16 PM
The movie is far from my favorite, but you cannot deny how good that Spinosaur looks.

I wouldn't go that far. It looks like it's made out of plastic. And while the head is realistic, it's lifeless - by taking some artistic licence with Rexy's eyes and orbits, it's full of expression and therefore more believable and menacing.

The JP3 raptors look great though in my opinion, massive real-world inaccuracy aside.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Jun 23, 2013, 11:24:56 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jun 23, 2013, 10:35:44 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Jun 23, 2013, 08:28:16 PM
The movie is far from my favorite, but you cannot deny how good that Spinosaur looks.

I wouldn't go that far. It looks like it's made out of plastic. And while the head is realistic, it's lifeless - by taking some artistic licence with Rexy's eyes and orbits, it's full of expression and therefore more believable and menacing.

The JP3 raptors look great though in my opinion, massive real-world inaccuracy aside.

I don't see the plastic look, at least in this shot.  I've always liked the coloration of the dinos in Jp3, and I think this shot shows it well. The size of his sail, and overall bulkiness of its design, never sat well with me though.

As for the new script leak, I'm open to the idea of seeing a finished park, with all the different dinosaurs in their exhibits with the rides up and running. But I think I prefer the idea of seeing what's happened to the original park, after 20 years of rot and jungle growth not unlike the art style of The Last of Us. I would love to revisit Isla Nublar , if only for a brief part of the movie.

And seriously, can I see a Carnotaurus? It's on the top of my list of dinosaurs I would like to appear in this new movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 24, 2013, 02:39:30 AM
Quote from: Xenomorphine on Jun 22, 2013, 09:31:01 PM
Where would they have got the DNA from? Mosquitoes don't exactly fly about under the waves. :)

If they have to do an aquatic monster movie, I'd rather see a legitimate adaptation of Peter Benchley's giant squid-themed novel, 'Beast'... I know there was a TV film, but a whole lot of stuff got changed around and the ending wasn't nearly as awesome as the one depicted in the book.

Maybe, just maybe, they could somehow do an angle with Megalodon and say soft tissue or rather was extracted from deep within a fossilized tooth. But that's very much a stretch.

Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 23, 2013, 08:15:34 PM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/998996_479416052138071_1387261191_n.jpg)

Eh, it could look better. The head and sail are all wrong.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jun 24, 2013, 03:09:49 AM
I just want them to do the Tyrannosaurus justice again. Is that so wrong?

Huh?









Huh?









Spoiler
HUUUUHHH?!
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 24, 2013, 03:17:11 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 23, 2013, 08:15:34 PM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/998996_479416052138071_1387261191_n.jpg)

As much as I dislike that dino for what it did, it still looks fantastic there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 24, 2013, 03:23:46 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 23, 2013, 12:17:03 AM
New JP4 vlog!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJ3_k1lsZ5c (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJ3_k1lsZ5c)

Thoughts?

Even though I do have similar gripes with you about what genius company would still go through with making another park, I do like the idea of having an open park get chaotic. It is a concern to me that there might be too many characters if they take this approach, but I still think it can be great material for the movie.

I really think they are taking a page from Jurassic Park: The Game here with their "new, more intelligent" dinosaur. I fear it will be the Troodon. Granted, it did actually freak me out a couple of times in the game when I did manage to get immersed  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 24, 2013, 03:35:11 AM
The spino looks good in that shot, but it kind of falls apart in the close ups. Also, the eyes just look weird to me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 24, 2013, 03:45:06 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 23, 2013, 12:17:03 AM
New JP4 vlog!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJ3_k1lsZ5c (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJ3_k1lsZ5c)

Thoughts?

I relly like hearing your thoughts in all your vlogs.  I definitely want to hear what your opinion is on a (if ever possible) Tyrannosaurus Vs Spinosaurus rematch and a possible introduction to another super predator (Giganatosaurus, Charcaradontosaurus or possibly Acrocanthosaurus?)  Also Carnotaurus, Allosaurus and expansion on Ceratosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 24, 2013, 07:33:38 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 24, 2013, 02:39:30 AM
Eh, it could look better. The head and sail are all wrong.
Like the Dilophosaurus' frill et al?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 24, 2013, 07:54:35 AM
Yup.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jun 24, 2013, 08:22:47 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 23, 2013, 08:15:34 PM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/998996_479416052138071_1387261191_n.jpg)
The craftsmanship put into that is just insane, and I love it. Certainly worked wonders, even if the transition to CG and back to the animatronic was jarring at times. Hopefully they still use the large scale animatronics in JP4, or else they'll be taking away a lot of the beautiful combination of effects the series is known for... even if JP III kinda dropped the ball at times.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 24, 2013, 08:35:31 AM
Hey Sweeps. Hey hey Sweeps.

Just for you:

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/1017492_10201377798904599_1182669096_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jun 24, 2013, 08:42:41 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 24, 2013, 08:35:31 AM
Hey Sweeps. Hey hey Sweeps.

Just for you:

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/1017492_10201377798904599_1182669096_n.jpg)
...I think that's the highest resolution I've ever seen that picture in.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.szrejdio.pl%2Fmems%2Ftemplates%2FMom_Plase.jpg&hash=3d01232491d8914ab08da48ec314826d2db1a7cb)

Thank you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Jun 24, 2013, 08:53:21 AM
There's always a bigger picture...

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimageshack.us%2Fa%2Fimg850%2F7062%2Finh9.jpg&hash=e4fb7408531b1d3993a724c72117a8fde9d5c6f1)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 24, 2013, 09:41:33 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 24, 2013, 03:45:06 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 23, 2013, 12:17:03 AM
New JP4 vlog!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJ3_k1lsZ5c (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJ3_k1lsZ5c)

Thoughts?

I relly like hearing your thoughts in all your vlogs.  I definitely want to hear what your opinion is on a (if ever possible) Tyrannosaurus Vs Spinosaurus rematch and a possible introduction to another super predator (Giganatosaurus, Charcaradontosaurus or possibly Acrocanthosaurus?)  Also Carnotaurus, Allosaurus and expansion on Ceratosaurus.

I don't think there should be a T-Rex Spino rematch this isn't Dino-WWE :P

Carnotaurus is the route to go because they can literally take it from page to screen, which I think ALOT of fans (myself included) would love to see.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 25, 2013, 12:25:53 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 24, 2013, 09:41:33 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 24, 2013, 03:45:06 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 23, 2013, 12:17:03 AM
New JP4 vlog!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJ3_k1lsZ5c (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJ3_k1lsZ5c)

Thoughts?

I relly like hearing your thoughts in all your vlogs.  I definitely want to hear what your opinion is on a (if ever possible) Tyrannosaurus Vs Spinosaurus rematch and a possible introduction to another super predator (Giganatosaurus, Charcaradontosaurus or possibly Acrocanthosaurus?)  Also Carnotaurus, Allosaurus and expansion on Ceratosaurus.

I don't think there should be a T-Rex Spino rematch this isn't Dino-WWE :P

Carnotaurus is the route to go because they can literally take it from page to screen, which I think ALOT of fans (myself included) would love to see.

Even the chamelion properties shown in the book? Personally, I'd love to see it but I fear they could end up making it look silly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 25, 2013, 12:28:17 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jun 25, 2013, 12:25:53 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 24, 2013, 09:41:33 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 24, 2013, 03:45:06 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 23, 2013, 12:17:03 AM
New JP4 vlog!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJ3_k1lsZ5c (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJ3_k1lsZ5c)

Thoughts?

I relly like hearing your thoughts in all your vlogs.  I definitely want to hear what your opinion is on a (if ever possible) Tyrannosaurus Vs Spinosaurus rematch and a possible introduction to another super predator (Giganatosaurus, Charcaradontosaurus or possibly Acrocanthosaurus?)  Also Carnotaurus, Allosaurus and expansion on Ceratosaurus.

I don't think there should be a T-Rex Spino rematch this isn't Dino-WWE :P

Carnotaurus is the route to go because they can literally take it from page to screen, which I think ALOT of fans (myself included) would love to see.

Even the chamelion properties shown in the book? Personally, I'd love to see it but I fear they could end up making it look silly.
The worst they could do is rip off of Predator
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 25, 2013, 12:42:33 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 24, 2013, 09:41:33 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 24, 2013, 03:45:06 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 23, 2013, 12:17:03 AM
New JP4 vlog!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJ3_k1lsZ5c (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJ3_k1lsZ5c)

Thoughts?

I relly like hearing your thoughts in all your vlogs.  I definitely want to hear what your opinion is on a (if ever possible) Tyrannosaurus Vs Spinosaurus rematch and a possible introduction to another super predator (Giganatosaurus, Charcaradontosaurus or possibly Acrocanthosaurus?)  Also Carnotaurus, Allosaurus and expansion on Ceratosaurus.

I don't think there should be a T-Rex Spino rematch this isn't Dino-WWE :P

You know you want it ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 25, 2013, 12:56:54 AM
Just managed to buy this bad boy for £24 on Ebay!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi43.tinypic.com%2F2uhsccj.jpg&hash=d3724a7a8d1589ab6683be4e6dc2deadfa8532c1)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 25, 2013, 01:02:53 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 25, 2013, 12:28:17 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jun 25, 2013, 12:25:53 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 24, 2013, 09:41:33 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 24, 2013, 03:45:06 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 23, 2013, 12:17:03 AM
New JP4 vlog!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJ3_k1lsZ5c (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJ3_k1lsZ5c)

Thoughts?

I relly like hearing your thoughts in all your vlogs.  I definitely want to hear what your opinion is on a (if ever possible) Tyrannosaurus Vs Spinosaurus rematch and a possible introduction to another super predator (Giganatosaurus, Charcaradontosaurus or possibly Acrocanthosaurus?)  Also Carnotaurus, Allosaurus and expansion on Ceratosaurus.

I don't think there should be a T-Rex Spino rematch this isn't Dino-WWE :P

Carnotaurus is the route to go because they can literally take it from page to screen, which I think ALOT of fans (myself included) would love to see.

Even the chamelion properties shown in the book? Personally, I'd love to see it but I fear they could end up making it look silly.
The worst they could do is rip off of Predator

It's not the worst they can do....what if they do the humanoid dinosaur things after all  :-[
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 25, 2013, 01:25:16 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 25, 2013, 12:56:54 AM
Just managed to buy this bad boy for £24 on Ebay!

http://i43.tinypic.com/2uhsccj.jpg

Don't you already have one?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jun 25, 2013, 01:43:29 AM
Quote from: Shasvre on Jun 24, 2013, 08:53:21 AM
There's always a bigger picture...

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimageshack.us%2Fa%2Fimg850%2F7062%2Finh9.jpg&hash=e4fb7408531b1d3993a724c72117a8fde9d5c6f1)
[close]

Good God. SO AWESOME.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 25, 2013, 05:13:57 AM
Very nice
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 25, 2013, 08:26:48 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 25, 2013, 01:25:16 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 25, 2013, 12:56:54 AM
Just managed to buy this bad boy for £24 on Ebay!

http://i43.tinypic.com/2uhsccj.jpg

Don't you already have one?

I do but he's been custom painted and I wanted another which still had the old colours.

Also for anyone interested here is a complete list of all my JP YouTube videos thus far...

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLM1CUnmT_bTNCBvWWM_seVURo5KCbFA2T&feature=mh_lolz (http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLM1CUnmT_bTNCBvWWM_seVURo5KCbFA2T&feature=mh_lolz)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 25, 2013, 08:35:20 AM
Ah true. Do the electronics still work?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 25, 2013, 08:43:23 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 25, 2013, 08:35:20 AM
Ah true. Do the electronics still work?

Apparently they do : ) The only damage it has is a chipped finger and a tiny tear on the underside of its leg. Nothing too bad, and with a spot of super glue that tear could be history. Judging by the pictures.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 25, 2013, 08:48:48 AM
Very nice. I just bought a full-sized 1992 Velociraptor mask from eBay! You may remember it. It was sold alongside a Dilophosaurus mask right around the time the film was released. Unfortunately, I was outbid on the Dilo mask. I used to own it as a kid but of course, I completely trashed it. I'll get some pics up when it arrives.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 25, 2013, 08:51:38 AM
Awesome! Sadly I don't own any of the masks :(

Last night I also bought another version of the JP laserdisc.

Currently building up my collection preparing to complete 'My Jurassic Park Collection' video trilogy sometime next year. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 25, 2013, 09:03:25 AM
Another version? What's different about it?

Another video eh? You realize, this means war? ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 25, 2013, 09:58:19 AM
Haha! WAR!

I already own this amazing laserdisc...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIfSci3h6mI# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIfSci3h6mI#)

Ordered this one last night...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Flaserdiscplanet.com%2Fimages%2FJurassic_Park_DTS.jpg&hash=8e6c9c0c552341ae4b09f7422c7d4ba3c1363bb2)

I don't think there's any difference in cuts of the movie, but who knows with laserdisc! Like the laserdisc cut of E.T with Harrison Ford in it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jun 25, 2013, 08:04:05 PM
Still PATIENTLY waiting for the Director's cut of Jurassic Park. There are certainly deleted scenes, but they are rarer than a prisoner with a gun in Alien 3 ;)

Interesting to hear about Harrison Ford in the E.T. laserdisc...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 25, 2013, 09:48:05 PM
Pics of some Deleted Scenes, in the JP fanworld there is talk of a version of the movie that was put into theatres and was later pulled...20 minutes longer or so, there were more than a few that claimed this.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jurassic-park.fr%2Ffckeditor_upload%2Fimage%2Fjurassic-park%2Fscenes-coupees%2Fjp_cutscene_1.jpg&hash=cf02b94bc8663dd804906b56871c5482b96ca8dd)

Alan & Ellie discuss how the velociraptor died

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjpencyclopedia%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F07%2Fellieleaflg.jpg&hash=2f53dc1b48985b8897dbb8167f718716023787ef)

Ellie grabs the leaf

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdic.academic.ru%2Fpictures%2Fwiki%2Ffiles%2F74%2FJurassic_Park_cast.jpg&hash=6bc6ca3b416e16280b1f2d42def13478fde7ce14)

Ian says it's a bad idea to have the children in the park, Hammond tells him they need some fun since their parents are divorcing.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages2.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20090425000704%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2Fthumb%2F2%2F2f%2FExtdig1sm.jpg%2F122px-Extdig1sm.jpg&hash=992e7a5721095757f91bc290ae42337a5033c6e7)

Alan & Ellie continue their walk and talk about children, they finally kiss before the helicopter arrivés

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdinosaurneill.jpdatabase.net%2FPictures%2Fvalentinestd.jpg&hash=f4a807570406a545f168e114c61da9ef2426a89a)

Sorry couldn't find a normal photo of this, Ellie resolves what makes the Trike sick

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages3.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20090425014513%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2Fe%2Fe0%2FExtraptorshedbig.jpg&hash=292fa6b75e5693d770da2ff6fb1b661644114596)

Ellie has opened the door to the shed but hears Grant shouting for her...notice her missing overshirt and blood on her shoulder

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jun 25, 2013, 10:13:43 PM
^ I remember seeing the second picture (of Ellie holding the leaf) in the trailer. I also remember a pic or two of when the docs and Malcolm were with Hammond talking about the tour before getting in the Jeeps. PLEASE release the deleted scenes Steven Spielberg!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 25, 2013, 11:54:04 PM
Man, everyday I wonder where the deleted scenes are and long for an extended cut.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 25, 2013, 11:57:42 PM
I'm good without one. The movie is great as is.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 25, 2013, 11:59:08 PM
Like the origonal would disappear if they made an extended cut. ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Jun 25, 2013, 11:59:30 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 25, 2013, 11:57:42 PM
I'm good without one. The movie is great as is.
Yeah, but I always like to see what could have been, so I can compare the two.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Jun 26, 2013, 12:08:35 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 23, 2013, 08:15:34 PM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/998996_479416052138071_1387261191_n.jpg)

Now I want it to eat Horner.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jun 26, 2013, 01:28:24 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 25, 2013, 11:54:04 PM
Man, everyday I wonder where the deleted scenes are and long for an extended cut.
Every day since 1993!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 26, 2013, 02:38:38 AM
Quote from: Xan21 on Jun 25, 2013, 09:48:05 PM
Pics of some Deleted Scenes, in the JP fanworld there is talk of a version of the movie that was put into theatres and was later pulled...20 minutes longer or so, there were more than a few that claimed this.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jurassic-park.fr%2Ffckeditor_upload%2Fimage%2Fjurassic-park%2Fscenes-coupees%2Fjp_cutscene_1.jpg&hash=cf02b94bc8663dd804906b56871c5482b96ca8dd)

Alan & Ellie discuss how the velociraptor died

http://www.jplegacy.org/jpencyclopedia/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ellieleaflg.jpg

Ellie grabs the leaf

http://dic.academic.ru/pictures/wiki/files/74/Jurassic_Park_cast.jpg

Ian says it's a bad idea to have the children in the park, Hammond tells him they need some fun since their parents are divorcing.

http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20090425000704/jurassicpark/images/thumb/2/2f/Extdig1sm.jpg/122px-Extdig1sm.jpg

Alan & Ellie continue their walk and talk about children, they finally kiss before the helicopter arrivés

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdinosaurneill.jpdatabase.net%2FPictures%2Fvalentinestd.jpg&hash=f4a807570406a545f168e114c61da9ef2426a89a)

Sorry couldn't find a normal photo of this, Ellie resolves what makes the Trike sick

http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20090425014513/jurassicpark/images/e/e0/Extraptorshedbig.jpg

Ellie has opened the door to the shed but hears Grant shouting for her...notice her missing overshirt and blood on her shoulder

An extended cut would be nice as you can never have enough JP. I've heard rumours too that in the original film, before release on home video, the T.Rex bites the lawyer in half on-screen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jun 26, 2013, 03:03:52 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 26, 2013, 02:38:38 AM
Quote from: Xan21 on Jun 25, 2013, 09:48:05 PM
Pics of some Deleted Scenes, in the JP fanworld there is talk of a version of the movie that was put into theatres and was later pulled...20 minutes longer or so, there were more than a few that claimed this.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jurassic-park.fr%2Ffckeditor_upload%2Fimage%2Fjurassic-park%2Fscenes-coupees%2Fjp_cutscene_1.jpg&hash=cf02b94bc8663dd804906b56871c5482b96ca8dd)

Alan & Ellie discuss how the velociraptor died

http://www.jplegacy.org/jpencyclopedia/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ellieleaflg.jpg

Ellie grabs the leaf

http://dic.academic.ru/pictures/wiki/files/74/Jurassic_Park_cast.jpg

Ian says it's a bad idea to have the children in the park, Hammond tells him they need some fun since their parents are divorcing.

http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20090425000704/jurassicpark/images/thumb/2/2f/Extdig1sm.jpg/122px-Extdig1sm.jpg

Alan & Ellie continue their walk and talk about children, they finally kiss before the helicopter arrivés

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdinosaurneill.jpdatabase.net%2FPictures%2Fvalentinestd.jpg&hash=f4a807570406a545f168e114c61da9ef2426a89a)

Sorry couldn't find a normal photo of this, Ellie resolves what makes the Trike sick

http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20090425014513/jurassicpark/images/e/e0/Extraptorshedbig.jpg

Ellie has opened the door to the shed but hears Grant shouting for her...notice her missing overshirt and blood on her shoulder

An extended cut would be nice as you can never have enough JP. I've heard rumours too that in the original film, before release on home video, the T.Rex bites the lawyer in half on-screen.
Ala...(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F-XtU2-4eIjCo%2FT_RWi2sxItI%2FAAAAAAAAADg%2F6TnEh6R7Rlc%2Fs1600%2Fbishop.jpg&hash=86fd8085de83129b62608f3f9b114eecd9b5d035)That would be much cooler but may have bumped the movie to "R"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 26, 2013, 03:23:29 AM
Heh, minus the crawling on the floor part ;)
Hey, I'm all for an R-rated Jurassic Park. I want to see just a little more violence like in the book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jun 26, 2013, 03:38:53 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 26, 2013, 03:23:29 AM
Heh, minus the crawling on the floor part ;)
Hey, I'm all for an R-rated Jurassic Park. I want to see just a little more violence like in the book.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fedwinaluck.files.wordpress.com%2F2012%2F05%2Ft-rex-happy-and-you-know-it.jpg%3Fw%3D600%26amp%3Bh%3D400&hash=9bf4d4514a7e14318a40cd300d39bcfa77c8f8ff)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 26, 2013, 07:36:23 AM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Jun 26, 2013, 03:03:52 AM
That would be much cooler but may have bumped the movie to "R"

Depends on how it was done. Remember Eddie Carr gets torn in half on screen in TLW and the movie's not an R.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 26, 2013, 07:39:19 AM
It was tame though. Being ripped in half like that would result in blood flying everywhere.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 26, 2013, 07:43:03 AM
Unless he is torn in two from the shaking rather than a pair of legs left sat on the toilet. That way you could have no blood and still have him go to pieces.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 26, 2013, 07:47:06 AM
If the body is torn in half, blood will flow. It doesn't matter if it's Eddie Carr in the air or Donald Gennaro sitting on the toilet/being shaken to death.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jun 26, 2013, 07:50:51 AM
There's no chance in hell this will be rated R. These are glorified kids films. Gotta sell them toys.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 26, 2013, 08:04:04 AM
Quote from: Xan21 on Jun 25, 2013, 09:48:05 PM
Pics of some Deleted Scenes, in the JP fanworld there is talk of a version of the movie that was put into theatres and was later pulled...20 minutes longer or so, there were more than a few that claimed this.

I don't think it was even pulled, I think that was the theatrical release in 1993. My memory's vague as I was 7 at the time, but I do dimly remember all those extra scenes. Not sure it clocked an extra 20 minutes though.
I also don't think Gennaro's demise was any more graphic than the version we're used to.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 26, 2013, 08:10:26 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 26, 2013, 07:47:06 AM
If the body is torn in half, blood will flow. It doesn't matter if it's Eddie Carr in the air or Donald Gennaro sitting on the toilet/being shaken to death.

So where was the blood when Eddie was torn in half? I remember being 8 in the cinema and thinking holy crap, he just got ripped in two! And this films a PG!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 26, 2013, 08:11:40 AM
There wasn't any. I'm just saying that if the film received an R-rating like I personally would prefer, it would've been there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on Jun 26, 2013, 08:15:00 AM
This is the problem when people who love something as a kid grow up and still want more of it -- whether it be a movie series or games. They want the new stuff to reflect what they like now and forget that as much as it might frustrate them, these are still for kids.

See also, Pokemon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 26, 2013, 08:20:28 AM
Well of course there'd be blood if it was an R, but I was going over what FiorinaFury161 said.

That if Gennero was cut in half in JP it may have been bumped up to an R, hence it's apparent removal. I was merely pointing out that this rumoured scene could have been left in the film and keep its PG rating.

Like how TLW kept its PG rating despite having a scene where a guy gets pulled in half. It can be done without blood.

Another example is Darth Maul and Phantom being a universal rating. (I'm aware he was cut in two with a light sabre which means there could be no blood as it would have most likley sealed the wound.)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 26, 2013, 08:25:33 AM
Quote from: SiL on Jun 26, 2013, 08:15:00 AM
This is the problem when people who love something as a kid grow up and still want more of it -- whether it be a movie series or games. They want the new stuff to reflect what they like now and forget that as much as it might frustrate them, these are still for kids.

See also, Pokemon.

Fair point. I'd prefer a more violent Jurassic Park but I definitely wouldn't lose any sleep over not receiving one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 26, 2013, 08:26:40 AM
Effectively the sick Triceratops subplot was never fully resolved... would like to see the deleted rsolution to it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 26, 2013, 08:33:08 AM
I've always imagined there being quite a bit missing from the raptor attack in the visitors centre. But I could say that about any scene.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 26, 2013, 08:43:37 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 26, 2013, 08:26:40 AM
Effectively the sick Triceratops subplot was never fully resolved... would like to see the deleted rsolution to it.

How much could they have given us though? Either she heals up and lives happily ever after or dies a slow and painful death. Not to mention, even if we find out what Sattler had deduced was making the Trike sick, it's never mentioned in the film again which is probably why it was cut to begin with.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 26, 2013, 08:48:37 AM
Simply say what exactly made the dinosaur sick. I don't mind the no-answer but it would be nice to see the original resolution.


About JP4 being rated R... No! Why would you want it to be R?

For the wide audience these movies have, the type of violence we have had so far -- including severed arms, waterfalls with blood and snapped necks -- is more than enough.

The infamous Eddie Carr death I might remind you was at night and during rain -- there is blood if you look very closely, but it's not very clear due to the photography (which I think was intentional). :)

A R rated new adaptation, sure -- the novel is pretty damn violent -- but leave this series how it always was.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 26, 2013, 10:59:40 AM
I agree with everything above, but who said anything about JP4 being rated R?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 26, 2013, 11:05:33 AM
I rewatched Jurassic Park recently to double check but isn't there a scene in the helicopter where Malcolm compliments Ellie's legs and she just stares at him with her mouth open as he keeps rambling? My brother noticed its omission and it confused us greatly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 26, 2013, 11:11:14 AM
He says 'I refuse to believe that you aren't familiar with the concept of attraction'. Nothing about legs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 26, 2013, 03:15:08 PM
I doubt the explanation for the sick Trike would be any different from the explanation the book gives for the sick Stego.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on Jun 26, 2013, 04:02:49 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 26, 2013, 07:39:19 AM
It was tame though. Being ripped in half like that would result in blood flying everywhere.

That movie you want with dinosaurs ripping people to shreds while blood flies all over the place and imtestines get devoured would have not been greenlit, therefore, jp would have never happened. Why? because studio execs wont pay big money for violent films, because it would totally turn off mainstream people. Nobody would pay for this except the hardcore fans. Which again means that it would flop astronomically.

Therefore i say no to rated R.

One (bad) example that shows what I mean


AvP 1: kid friendly, marketingwise appealing to anyone who likes action

Box office: 172 mil

AvP 2: gory, brutal, gruesome, hardcore fans like the trailers (ofcourse everyone hated the result ;))

Box office 124

Hence: franchise dead

Another example would be aliens (mass friendly) to alien (cult, but gained many fans through the sequel)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 26, 2013, 04:08:10 PM
Quote from: Tangakkai on Jun 26, 2013, 04:02:49 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 26, 2013, 07:39:19 AM
It was tame though. Being ripped in half like that would result in blood flying everywhere.

That movie you want with dinosaurs ripping people to shreds while blood flies all over the place and imtestines get devoured would have not been greenlit, therefore, jp would have never happened. Why? because studio execs wont pay big money for violent films, because it would totally turn off mainstream people. Nobody would pay for this except the hardcore fans. Which again means that it would flop astronomically.

Therefore i say no to rated R.

One (bad) example that shows what I mean


AvP 1: kid friendly, marketingwise appealing to anyone who likes action

Box office: 172 mil

AvP 2: gory, brutal, gruesome, hardcore fans like the trailers (ofcourse everyone hated the result ;))

Box office 124

Hence: franchise dead

Another example would be aliens (mass friendly) to alien (cult, but gained many fans through the sequel)
It must be totally different now, huh.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 26, 2013, 04:11:02 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 26, 2013, 10:59:40 AM
I agree with everything above, but who said anything about JP4 being rated R?

I expressed interest in it.

I'm not saying the film has to be overly violent for the sake of violence. But, if a person is going to be bitten in two like Cooper by the Spinosaurus for instance, the effect of that should be clearly seen. Remember when Bruce gets a hold of Quinn in Jaws after he jumps partially onto the boat? The blood was there in spades.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jun 26, 2013, 04:41:54 PM
Quote from: Tangakkai on Jun 26, 2013, 04:02:49 PM


Box office 124

Hence: franchise dead

Well AVPR had awful word of mouth. It's not a surprise that it made less then the first movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 26, 2013, 04:55:17 PM
Wasn't the blood visible on the plane windows Cooper's?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jun 26, 2013, 05:27:00 PM
^ Yes it was. Trying to find a pic but can't, but it is DEF there, even if for a second or less.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jun 26, 2013, 06:19:14 PM
An R rated JP4 could be something beautiful, but then again it could be something awful.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jun 26, 2013, 08:17:39 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Jun 26, 2013, 04:41:54 PM
Quote from: Tangakkai on Jun 26, 2013, 04:02:49 PM


Box office 124

Hence: franchise dead

Well AVPR had awful word of mouth. It's not a surprise that it made less then the first movie.

Yup. Rating had next to zero to do with the lower BO.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 26, 2013, 09:01:50 PM
Quote from: Tangakkai on Jun 26, 2013, 04:02:49 PM
AvP 2: gory, brutal, gruesome, hardcore fans like the trailers (ofcourse everyone hated the result ;))

Box office 124

Hence: franchise dead

Franchise dead? Predators. Prometheus. Prometheus 2? I'd say AVP:2 was the catalyst to bring the two franchises back!

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 26, 2013, 04:11:02 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 26, 2013, 10:59:40 AM
I agree with everything above, but who said anything about JP4 being rated R?

I expressed interest in it.

I'm not saying the film has to be overly violent for the sake of violence. But, if a person is going to be bitten in two like Cooper by the Spinosaurus for instance, the effect of that should be clearly seen. Remember when Bruce gets a hold of Quinn in Jaws after he jumps partially onto the boat? The blood was there in spades.

In all honesty I could see another adaption of the Jurassic Park book more akin to the adult nature working very well, it would just need a new title (Billy & the Clone-a-saurus) and a complete promotional package that fully expresses that its NOT A KIDS FILM.

I believe the studio has the adult JP on the back burner, (even James Cameron expressed that his version would have been more violent) and I could see it happening maybe in 50 years time.

You heard it here first. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 26, 2013, 11:28:56 PM
Check it....

http://www.jplegacy.org/index.php?&voted=true (http://www.jplegacy.org/index.php?&voted=true)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 27, 2013, 02:36:53 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 26, 2013, 09:01:50 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 26, 2013, 04:11:02 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 26, 2013, 10:59:40 AM
I agree with everything above, but who said anything about JP4 being rated R?

I expressed interest in it.

I'm not saying the film has to be overly violent for the sake of violence. But, if a person is going to be bitten in two like Cooper by the Spinosaurus for instance, the effect of that should be clearly seen. Remember when Bruce gets a hold of Quinn in Jaws after he jumps partially onto the boat? The blood was there in spades.

In all honesty I could see another adaption of the Jurassic Park book more akin to the adult nature working very well, it would just need a new title (Billy & the Clone-a-saurus) and a complete promotional package that fully expresses that its NOT A KIDS FILM.

I believe the studio has the adult JP on the back burner, (even James Cameron expressed that his version would have been more violent) and I could see it happening maybe in 50 years time.

You heard it here first. 8)

I'd say 20 years :P
But in all honesty, really, I say 20 years before a reboot happens. It's a major money franchise for Universal so I highly doubt they're going to let it die. Jurassic Park III wasn't a big success but they still pulled together for a fourth so you never know.

Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 26, 2013, 11:28:56 PM
Check it....

http://www.jplegacy.org/index.php?&voted=true (http://www.jplegacy.org/index.php?&voted=true)


QuoteLegacy effects are working on the Dinosaurs

I'm sold ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 27, 2013, 02:58:36 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 26, 2013, 11:11:14 AM
He says 'I refuse to believe that you aren't familiar with the concept of attraction'. Nothing about legs.

No no in the helicopter scene when they are heading to the island. Me and my brother kept rewinding....maybe it's only in the book....huh.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 27, 2013, 07:38:13 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jun 27, 2013, 02:58:36 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 26, 2013, 11:11:14 AM
He says 'I refuse to believe that you aren't familiar with the concept of attraction'. Nothing about legs.

No no in the helicopter scene when they are heading to the island. Me and my brother kept rewinding....maybe it's only in the book....huh.

That is in the helicopter scene.

Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 26, 2013, 11:28:56 PM
Check it....

http://www.jplegacy.org/index.php?&voted=true (http://www.jplegacy.org/index.php?&voted=true)


Nothing really new, but interesting.

Legacy Effects ey :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 27, 2013, 10:42:19 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 27, 2013, 07:38:13 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jun 27, 2013, 02:58:36 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 26, 2013, 11:11:14 AM
He says 'I refuse to believe that you aren't familiar with the concept of attraction'. Nothing about legs.

No no in the helicopter scene when they are heading to the island. Me and my brother kept rewinding....maybe it's only in the book....huh.

That is in the helicopter scene.


Yes I know but I mean that's not what I'm talking about. Nevermind I'll look into it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Jun 27, 2013, 02:03:26 PM
In the novel, Malcolm says Sattler has nice legs and that he could look at them all day. In the film all he says us that refuses to believe that she is unfamiliar with the concept of attraction.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 27, 2013, 04:18:11 PM
And that's after lightly groping Hammond's left leg :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 27, 2013, 04:22:16 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Jun 27, 2013, 02:03:26 PM
In the novel, Malcolm says Sattler has nice legs and that he could look at them all day.
Exactly.

Tim couldn't get his eyes off them either.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 27, 2013, 05:27:04 PM
Malcolm NEEDS to at least have a cameo in JP4
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 27, 2013, 05:42:21 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 27, 2013, 05:27:04 PM
Malcolm NEEDS to at least have a cameo in JP4

Life will find a way.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 27, 2013, 05:44:20 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 27, 2013, 05:27:04 PM
Malcolm NEEDS to at least have a cameo in JP4

He did in my script ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 27, 2013, 05:51:20 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 27, 2013, 05:44:20 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 27, 2013, 05:27:04 PM
Malcolm NEEDS to at least have a cameo in JP4

He did in my script ;)


Nice! 

Btw, you should make a JP4 vlog based on your thoughts for returning cast and how they should return.  Just a suggestion.  Would be awesome!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 27, 2013, 06:15:29 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 27, 2013, 05:51:20 PM
Btw, you should make a JP4 vlog based on your thoughts for returning cast and how they should return.  Just a suggestion.  Would be awesome!

Concerning a vlog about cast, I was going to wait until they announce who's to star before I get into that ;). It's always nice to hear ideas for my YouTube videos though! Suggestions are always welcome. Never fear I have some very special JP videos coming up in the near futre ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 28, 2013, 02:30:05 AM
Alien³, feast your eyes on this! It arrived on Wednesday 8)

Spoiler
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/1052967_10100471467059751_1906687344_o.jpg)
[close]

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jun 28, 2013, 03:40:12 AM
Having Jeff Goldblum in JP4 and ID2 will make 2015 a Jeff Goldblum summer. Since Terminator 5 is set for a June 2015 release then I hope they can find a spot in July or maybe early June  for JP4. I know Episode 7 will likely be king at the box office at the end of May and the first half of June.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 28, 2013, 07:53:55 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 28, 2013, 02:30:05 AM
Alien³, feast your eyes on this! It arrived on Wednesday 8)

Spoiler
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/1052967_10100471467059751_1906687344_o.jpg)
[close]

Hahaha! Ya loony!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 28, 2013, 03:37:20 PM
Nice, Doom  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 28, 2013, 05:03:02 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 28, 2013, 02:30:05 AM
Alien³, feast your eyes on this! It arrived on Wednesday 8)

Spoiler
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/1052967_10100471467059751_1906687344_o.jpg)
[close]

Ahhhhh. When you said full sized I thought you meant these bad boys ...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.egotvonline.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F05%2F6c6ce4-09.jpg%3F41ed4f&hash=7efd36530d93a4169d829b25c4bd68b96c62c841)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcn1.kaboodle.com%2Fhi%2Fimg%2F2%2F0%2F0%2F36%2Ff%2FAAAAAset6vwAAAAAADb4bw.jpg%3Fv%3D1172901282000&hash=5fbb937377423cde582fe9c1641343411a80db62)

... in which I'm after one of the raptor versions to replace the one I wore out while making this ...
Spoiler

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sT9h8otU_70# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sT9h8otU_70#)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Jun 28, 2013, 05:13:58 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 28, 2013, 05:03:02 PM
... in which I'm after one of the raptor versions to replace the one I wore out while making this ...
Spoiler

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sT9h8otU_70# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sT9h8otU_70#)
[close]

I would buy that on Blu-ray.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 28, 2013, 06:20:50 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 28, 2013, 05:03:02 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 28, 2013, 02:30:05 AM
Alien³, feast your eyes on this! It arrived on Wednesday 8)

Spoiler
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/1052967_10100471467059751_1906687344_o.jpg)
[close]

Ahhhhh. When you said full sized I thought you meant these bad boys ...

http://media.egotvonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/6c6ce4-09.jpg?41ed4f

http://cn1.kaboodle.com/hi/img/2/0/0/36/f/AAAAAset6vwAAAAAADb4bw.jpg?v=1172901282000

... in which I'm after one of the raptor versions to replace the one I wore out while making this ...
Spoiler

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sT9h8otU_70# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sT9h8otU_70#)
[close]

Oh pshaw. I wish I had one of those. Something tells me a mask that good would cost hundreds of dollars.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 28, 2013, 07:26:56 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 28, 2013, 06:20:50 PM
Oh pshaw. I wish I had one of those. Something tells me a mask that good would cost hundreds of dollars.

I seem to remember them costing between $75 and $100 when they were new. I had them both but the years have not been kind to them. The raptor was slammed into so many cars, hung out windows in the rain, covered in fake blood, beaten, shot, stabbed, dropped, drowned, left to bake in a car on 100 degree days, and stored in a garage for almost 15 years before I broke it out again to finish up some scenes to finally complete the film in 2005.

This is the dude in 2005.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimageshack.us%2Fa%2Fimg15%2F9635%2F54p.png&hash=04eb3edc0f9721a404a7442e19e915c3f0e9188d)
Pretty well preserved for the treatment.

Since then I can't recall what has become of the old bastard. He's either buried in storage or I got rid of the smelly old thing when I moved.

The Dilo I still have but the rubber is so rotten in places it will only do for a dinosaur corpse in some future production.

Either way ... still looking for those masks. Can see them easily going for $200-$400 on ebay in the right condition.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 29, 2013, 04:08:28 AM
@ Bat Chain,

Check this while the bid is still low.  Even has hands....

http://item.mobileweb.ebay.com/viewitem?itemId=151071068289&index=4&nav=SEARCH&nid=27324899385 (http://item.mobileweb.ebay.com/viewitem?itemId=151071068289&index=4&nav=SEARCH&nid=27324899385)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 29, 2013, 12:14:43 PM
That's the one Doom wants! I don't want to wallet block his chances of scoring those beauties. Also, I'm looking for the bigger masks. Thanks for the heads up though Req. Good looking out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 29, 2013, 05:38:28 PM
Actually, right after I PM'ed you, I contacted the seller asking if he'd ship to Canada. Hopefully he says yes!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 29, 2013, 06:34:19 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 28, 2013, 07:26:56 PM
This is the dude in 2005.
Did he abide?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jun 29, 2013, 06:46:01 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 29, 2013, 06:34:19 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 28, 2013, 07:26:56 PM
This is the dude in 2005.
Did he abide?

Beat me to it, damn you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 30, 2013, 02:19:11 PM
Heck yes I just won a laserdisc player and 22 laserdiscs for £60 on eBay!

Now I can finally watch my JP/TLW laserdiscs and make a video explaining what they're like compared to the DVDs/Blu-rays.

(if anyone is interested in that at all haha)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Jun 30, 2013, 03:32:09 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 30, 2013, 02:19:11 PM
Heck yes I just won a laserdisc player and 22 laserdiscs for £60 on eBay!

Now I can finally watch my JP/TLW laserdiscs and make a video explaining what they're like compared to the DVDs/Blu-rays.

(if anyone is interested in that at all haha)

Hell yes that sounds great! I was always fascinated by laser discs in that little-kid 'look at the giant, silver CD the size of a record' kind of way but never got to watch any. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Sexy Poot on Jun 30, 2013, 06:10:50 PM
Just bought Jurassic Park for the SNES at a flea market for $4 bucks. I know this has absolutely nothing to do with the movies but its related to the series and I'm bored.

  8):P 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomorphine on Jun 30, 2013, 06:38:41 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 30, 2013, 02:19:11 PM
Heck yes I just won a laserdisc player and 22 laserdiscs for £60 on eBay!

Now I can finally watch my JP/TLW laserdiscs and make a video explaining what they're like compared to the DVDs/Blu-rays.

(if anyone is interested in that at all haha)

I'm actually intrigued by this... Never watched one, but interested to learn how their quality differs from DVD and Blu-Ray, these days.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 01, 2013, 12:24:31 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 30, 2013, 02:19:11 PM
Heck yes I just won a laserdisc player and 22 laserdiscs for £60 on eBay!

Now I can finally watch my JP/TLW laserdiscs and make a video explaining what they're like compared to the DVDs/Blu-rays.

(if anyone is interested in that at all haha)
Please let us know if there are any DELETED or extended scenes in the Laserdisc version of JP! (crosses fingers)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 01, 2013, 12:32:19 AM
JURASSIC PARK!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DJ Pu$$yface on Jul 01, 2013, 01:52:37 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jul 01, 2013, 12:32:19 AM
JURASSIC PARK!!!!!!!!

MOVE TITLES IN CAPS LOCK WITH LOTS OF EXCLAMATION MARKS FOR NO PARTICULAR REASON!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 01, 2013, 02:06:36 AM
Quote from: DJ Pu$$yface on Jul 01, 2013, 01:52:37 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jul 01, 2013, 12:32:19 AM
JURASSIC PARK!!!!!!!!

MOVE TITLES IN CAPS LOCK WITH LOTS OF EXCLAMATION MARKS FOR NO PARTICULAR REASON!!!!

YYYEEESSSS!!!!!!!!!!!

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 01, 2013, 02:31:13 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 30, 2013, 02:19:11 PM
Heck yes I just won a laserdisc player and 22 laserdiscs for £60 on eBay!

Now I can finally watch my JP/TLW laserdiscs and make a video explaining what they're like compared to the DVDs/Blu-rays.

(if anyone is interested in that at all haha)

I would be! I've heard Laserdiscs in some cases look nicer than Blu-Rays.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 01, 2013, 07:49:31 AM
I won't be picking up the player until friday so my video won't be done until later this week or next.

I've heard the laserdisc shows more of the image! I'll believe it when I see it but someone made this...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.avsforum.com%2Fc%2Fc4%2Fc48c95be_vbattach229861.jpeg&hash=eff972a145e4f49bd5a17626c448bd2e61ca0341)

...and Yes the cases are outstanding. I'll cover it all in my video :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 01, 2013, 11:55:48 PM
Colin Trevorrow brief interview on JP4 at 4:30....

http://www.craveonline.com/film/interviews/528881-saturn-awards-2013-exclusive-red-carpet-interviews (http://www.craveonline.com/film/interviews/528881-saturn-awards-2013-exclusive-red-carpet-interviews)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2013, 06:23:46 PM
I've got some very exciting Jurassic Park news for you guys this Saturday! So watch this space.

My lips are sealed until then. :-X
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Jul 02, 2013, 06:27:53 PM
Ohhhhhh tease  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jul 02, 2013, 08:55:31 PM
Hurgh. Gonna be a long wait... I'm being hit by long waits a lot right now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 02, 2013, 09:15:15 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jun 29, 2013, 04:08:28 AM
@ Bat Chain,

Check this while the bid is still low.  Even has hands....

http://item.mobileweb.ebay.com/viewitem?itemId=151071068289&index=4&nav=SEARCH&nid=27324899385 (http://item.mobileweb.ebay.com/viewitem?itemId=151071068289&index=4&nav=SEARCH&nid=27324899385)

Well, lost the bid on that one. Too bad too, it was a good package.

I did see someone selling the full-sized movie replica one though for $400. Gonna be a while before I can grab that one!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jul 02, 2013, 09:47:01 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2013, 06:23:46 PM
I've got some very exciting Jurassic Park news for you guys this Saturday! So watch this space.

My lips are sealed until then. :-X

Wut, scoop?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomorphine on Jul 02, 2013, 10:08:05 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2013, 06:23:46 PM
I've got some very exciting Jurassic Park news for you guys this Saturday! So watch this space.

My lips are sealed until then. :-X

They're cloning an aquarium of Jeff Goldblums?! :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jul 02, 2013, 11:34:22 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2013, 06:23:46 PM
I've got some very exciting Jurassic Park news for you guys this Saturday! So watch this space.

My lips are sealed until then. :-X

Actual news that nobody else has? If so, that's torture man  :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 03, 2013, 01:46:43 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2013, 06:23:46 PM
I've got some very exciting Jurassic Park news for you guys this Saturday! So watch this space.

My lips are sealed until then. :-X
Please tell us you found the deleted/extended scenes from JP  :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 03, 2013, 02:14:12 AM

Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 03, 2013, 01:46:43 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2013, 06:23:46 PM
I've got some very exciting Jurassic Park news for you guys this Saturday! So watch this space.

My lips are sealed until then. :-X
Please tell us you found the deleted/extended scenes from JP  :o

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Zbt_R_d_V4# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Zbt_R_d_V4#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 03, 2013, 02:18:22 AM
So here's a question for you all. Who believes that one day, just maybe, Jurassic Park will become a reality?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PVTDukeMorrison on Jul 03, 2013, 02:22:04 AM
Does wishful thinking count as believing?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jul 03, 2013, 02:22:35 AM
Quote from: PVTDukeMorrison on Jul 03, 2013, 02:22:04 AM
Does wishful thinking count as believing?

Same.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jul 03, 2013, 03:06:07 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 03, 2013, 02:18:22 AM
So here's a question for you all. Who believes that one day, just maybe, Jurassic Park will become a reality?

Well I still believe "Life, ah...will find a way" despite the news that DNA doesn't last much more than a few thousand years.

EDIT: Well, it's only readable for about 1 million years. Or something like that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 03, 2013, 03:38:17 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 03, 2013, 02:18:22 AM
So here's a question for you all. Who believes that one day, just maybe, Jurassic Park will become a reality?
If it does, don't hire anyone named Dennis ;)

Seriously, the only way it will/could happen is if extra-terrestrial beings can teach us how to build DNA; we as humans can not reach the ultra advanced technologies or scientific knowledge ourselves in the next 2,000 years.

Quote from: Requiem28 on Jul 03, 2013, 02:14:12 AM

Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 03, 2013, 01:46:43 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2013, 06:23:46 PM
I've got some very exciting Jurassic Park news for you guys this Saturday! So watch this space.

My lips are sealed until then. :-X
Please tell us you found the deleted/extended scenes from JP  :o

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Zbt_R_d_V4# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Zbt_R_d_V4#)
My thoughts exactly!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomorphine on Jul 03, 2013, 05:42:24 AM
I suspect that science will find a way to astound you all with what it's already capable of...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jul 03, 2013, 08:11:42 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 03, 2013, 02:18:22 AM
So here's a question for you all. Who believes that one day, just maybe, Jurassic Park will become a reality?

I don't think it will happen within my lifetime, which makes me a sad panda.
Maybe some bastardised version, such as breeding recessive traits into chickens, or creating autonomous animatronic replicas, but not with actual dinosaurs. Looks like I may live to see a woolly mammoth, though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 03, 2013, 02:51:04 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 03, 2013, 08:11:42 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 03, 2013, 02:18:22 AM
So here's a question for you all. Who believes that one day, just maybe, Jurassic Park will become a reality?

I don't think it will happen within my lifetime, which makes me a sad panda.
Maybe some bastardised version, such as breeding recessive traits into chickens, or creating autonomous animatronic replicas, but not with actual dinosaurs. Looks like I may live to see a woolly mammoth, though.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stomptokyo.com%2Fimg-m3%2Fcarnosaur-d.jpg&hash=40741d3e5bd099f3d477023601eadd1b4cc50bd1)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stomptokyo.com%2Fimg-m3%2Fcarnosaur-c.jpg&hash=c5fc5b3c63ba2d3742ade5ecbd67b1c33c06ae11)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jul 03, 2013, 04:51:49 PM
Lols.

Having said all that though, I never thought we'd know colourations of any dinosaurs within my lifetime, or recreate the vocalisation of a hadrosaur, or that we'd be able to firmly state that birds are descended from dinosaurs, or that we'd find biological matter in a Tyrannosaurus bone. Palaeontology has made astonishing leaps over the last couple of decades, so I shouldn't dismiss the possibility of science pulling a Mesozoic rabbit out of some currently unknown hat.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenodog on Jul 03, 2013, 07:55:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 03, 2013, 02:18:22 AM
So here's a question for you all. Who believes that one day, just maybe, Jurassic Park will become a reality?

With certain extinct species that either dissapeared within recent time periods (like Thylacines) or had specific conditions they lived under that caused excellent preservation (Like Mammoths) I believe it could definitley happen.

With dinosaurs though, no.
'Pleistocene Park' over Jurassic Park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jul 03, 2013, 08:42:24 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 03, 2013, 02:51:04 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 03, 2013, 08:11:42 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 03, 2013, 02:18:22 AM
So here's a question for you all. Who believes that one day, just maybe, Jurassic Park will become a reality?

I don't think it will happen within my lifetime, which makes me a sad panda.
Maybe some bastardised version, such as breeding recessive traits into chickens, or creating autonomous animatronic replicas, but not with actual dinosaurs. Looks like I may live to see a woolly mammoth, though.
http://www.stomptokyo.com/img-m3/carnosaur-d.jpg

http://www.stomptokyo.com/img-m3/carnosaur-c.jpg

;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 04, 2013, 02:39:55 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jul 03, 2013, 08:42:24 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 03, 2013, 02:51:04 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 03, 2013, 08:11:42 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 03, 2013, 02:18:22 AM
So here's a question for you all. Who believes that one day, just maybe, Jurassic Park will become a reality?

I don't think it will happen within my lifetime, which makes me a sad panda.
Maybe some bastardised version, such as breeding recessive traits into chickens, or creating autonomous animatronic replicas, but not with actual dinosaurs. Looks like I may live to see a woolly mammoth, though.
http://www.stomptokyo.com/img-m3/carnosaur-d.jpg

http://www.stomptokyo.com/img-m3/carnosaur-c.jpg

;D
Glad someone got that reference!

(https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS_-04MIU_Y5FDy2gx9Qgv21m6sKUsuz5X4CcSIeWrSe67rCTYU)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 04, 2013, 04:00:18 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 03, 2013, 02:18:22 AM
So here's a question for you all. Who believes that one day, just maybe, Jurassic Park will become a reality?
No way to know what advancements science will have after a certain point.

So, maybe. Unfortunately I'll probably be bones by then, though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 04, 2013, 07:40:49 AM
Maybe in the future there will be a race of tiny dinosaurs who'll clone us! Oh when their tour vehicles break down outside my paddock this human is breaking free and having lunch.

Homo sapien Park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 04, 2013, 08:15:59 AM
Quote from: Xenodog on Jul 03, 2013, 07:55:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 03, 2013, 02:18:22 AM
So here's a question for you all. Who believes that one day, just maybe, Jurassic Park will become a reality?

With certain extinct species that either dissapeared within recent time periods (like Thylacines) or had specific conditions they lived under that caused excellent preservation (Like Mammoths) I believe it could definitley happen.

With dinosaurs though, no.
'Pleistocene Park' over Jurassic Park.

I'm actually surprised a mammoth hasn't been cloned already. Two at least have been discovered frozen in the ice so what's the hold up?

Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 03, 2013, 08:11:42 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 03, 2013, 02:18:22 AM
So here's a question for you all. Who believes that one day, just maybe, Jurassic Park will become a reality?

I don't think it will happen within my lifetime, which makes me a sad panda.
Maybe some bastardised version, such as breeding recessive traits into chickens, or creating autonomous animatronic replicas, but not with actual dinosaurs. Looks like I may live to see a woolly mammoth, though.

Like Xenomorphine said, science might astound us one day and considering birds and dinosaurs are related, it doesn't seem that impossible.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jul 04, 2013, 09:27:07 AM
Last I heard about the mammoth, they were working on it. Shit there was a lot of rumors that supposedly one had already been cloned, but they kept it a secret because it expired after a few weeks....but I took that with a grain of salt.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jul 04, 2013, 12:39:23 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jul 04, 2013, 09:27:07 AM
Last I heard about the mammoth, they were working on it. Shit there was a lot of rumors that supposedly one had already been cloned, but they kept it a secret because it aspired after a few weeks....but I took that with a grain of salt.
Aspired? Do you mean expire?
Title: What is your Favourite Dinosaur from Jurassic Park Series?
Post by: Greedo on Jul 04, 2013, 02:09:15 PM
Which one is yours ?
Title: Re: What is your Favourite Dinosaur from Jurassic Park Series?
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jul 04, 2013, 02:10:57 PM
Should've just posted this in the Jurassic Park thread...

Smh
Title: Re: What is your Favourite Dinosaur from Jurassic Park Series?
Post by: Lie on Jul 04, 2013, 02:13:31 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4h419wHTXWQ#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4h419wHTXWQ#ws)
Title: Re: What is your Favourite Dinosaur from Jurassic Park Series?
Post by: EJA on Jul 04, 2013, 05:49:29 PM
I've always wanted to see more of the Dilophosaurus.
Title: Re: What is your Favourite Dinosaur from Jurassic Park Series?
Post by: Aspie on Jul 04, 2013, 05:59:23 PM
I like the one with the hat.
Title: Re: What is your Favourite Dinosaur from Jurassic Park Series?
Post by: Blacklabel on Jul 04, 2013, 06:20:36 PM
Friar Tuck?  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomorphine on Jul 04, 2013, 06:25:03 PM
Topics merged, you filthy little wombat-killers. >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jul 05, 2013, 01:45:28 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jul 04, 2013, 12:39:23 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jul 04, 2013, 09:27:07 AM
Last I heard about the mammoth, they were working on it. Shit there was a lot of rumors that supposedly one had already been cloned, but they kept it a secret because it aspired after a few weeks....but I took that with a grain of salt.
Aspired? Do you mean expire?

Oh yes sorry. Sleep deprived when I wrote that  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 05, 2013, 02:28:06 AM
Since we are asking JP questions:

What are your most feared situations to be in from the movies?
Mine would be (in order):

1. Raptors in the Kitchen
2. Waking up to T-rex in the tent
3. Being Tim in the first T-rex attack in the tour vehicle

What are yours?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 05, 2013, 02:44:21 AM
Same as yours, really. Except if I was Tim, I'd have sense enough to not close the door.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomorphine on Jul 05, 2013, 07:25:44 AM
All three of those were tense, but the tent... Absolutely. Having its entire head right up next to you is a hell of a lot more dangerous than having a chance of not being noticed or escape.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 05, 2013, 08:44:48 AM
I wonder though if the Rex would have left them alone if Carter hadn't woken up and screamed. Rexy was scoping the place out but I gather if it had wanted to cause chaos, it wouldn't have conducted an investigation first.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jul 05, 2013, 03:24:52 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 05, 2013, 02:28:06 AM
Since we are asking JP questions:

What are your most feared situations to be in from the movies?
Mine would be (in order):

1. Raptors in the Kitchen
2. Waking up to T-rex in the tent
3. Being Tim in the first T-rex attack in the tour vehicle

What are yours?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_lie0gzSymq1qbnhnpo1_400.gif&hash=2c8e1a952263cd134157de380ea73fa7350c3249)

And also ...

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2F14e20789c6c228763e0fe141dbadbc1a%2Ftumblr_mlh5itpEM41rl52wjo1_500.gif&hash=c58bbe5bbdd8b1a1b23cda3390b81e4fc2a1d2c1)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Fa7ece05d3da398af0fe5e8934077e61f%2Ftumblr_ml3tf1alGA1re4omao1_500.jpg&hash=a7df0fbff43096c530497511aa49886ad0723499)
[close]
[close]

A close 3rd.
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F_0Jop1bOSh4E%2FTU7E56SN9bI%2FAAAAAAAAC6Y%2Fv0G1JJ-RWK4%2Fs1600%2FJurassic%2BPark%2BIII.png&hash=0066533c4e3b5927708984ec12b6e9ab1e0f157e)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jul 05, 2013, 03:59:29 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 05, 2013, 02:44:21 AM
Same as yours, really. Except if I was Tim, I'd have sense enough to not close the door.

YES! THANK YOU! AND TURN THE MOTHERf**kING LIGHT OFF!!!
Title: Re: What is your Favourite Dinosaur from Jurassic Park Series?
Post by: Trunks on Jul 05, 2013, 04:31:35 PM
Quote from: EJA on Jul 04, 2013, 05:49:29 PM
I've always wanted to see more of the Dilophosaurus.
That makes two of us.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomorphine on Jul 05, 2013, 06:19:08 PM
Mouse successfully cloned from a drop of blood:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-23068423 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-23068423)

Not long to go now!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jul 05, 2013, 07:11:39 PM
sup

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fschmoesknow.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F07%2Fjurassicteaser.jpg&hash=1dd54a148cade45416715d9e1ab75c014a56f238)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 05, 2013, 07:16:25 PM
Does that tagline mean that we're growing lots and lots of Ian Malcolms in test tubs this time?

Because if so, I'll buy lots ad lots of tickets in advance.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Jul 05, 2013, 07:19:29 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jul 05, 2013, 07:11:39 PM
sup

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fschmoesknow.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F07%2Fjurassicteaser.jpg&hash=1dd54a148cade45416715d9e1ab75c014a56f238)
[close]

Dat poster.

What a tease. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jul 05, 2013, 07:29:33 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jul 05, 2013, 07:11:39 PM
sup

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fschmoesknow.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F07%2Fjurassicteaser.jpg&hash=1dd54a148cade45416715d9e1ab75c014a56f238)
[close]

That can't be real, can it?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jul 05, 2013, 07:30:25 PM
Even if it's fake... IT'S AWESOMESAUCE.  :P 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jul 05, 2013, 07:32:12 PM
Oh, I'm praying it's real. I'm just skeptical.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 05, 2013, 07:39:57 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jul 05, 2013, 07:11:39 PM
sup

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fschmoesknow.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F07%2Fjurassicteaser.jpg&hash=1dd54a148cade45416715d9e1ab75c014a56f238)
[close]

Please be real!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Jul 05, 2013, 09:27:01 PM
Official or fan-made, I really like it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 05, 2013, 09:49:02 PM
THAT BETTER BE REAL!  Not sure why the titles are flipped though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jul 05, 2013, 10:26:25 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jul 05, 2013, 07:11:39 PM
sup

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fschmoesknow.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F07%2Fjurassicteaser.jpg&hash=1dd54a148cade45416715d9e1ab75c014a56f238)
[close]

Originally, I was going to make a six paragraph post with nothing but exclamation points, but I thought that would've been spam!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jul 05, 2013, 10:36:34 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jul 05, 2013, 07:11:39 PM
sup

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fschmoesknow.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F07%2Fjurassicteaser.jpg&hash=1dd54a148cade45416715d9e1ab75c014a56f238)
[close]
I'm so jaded by this point that I can't even smirk until I get official confirmation.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jul 05, 2013, 11:28:40 PM
Although I hate the idea of JP4, that is an awesome poster.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jul 06, 2013, 12:21:57 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBxgAmdPQWg#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBxgAmdPQWg#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Jul 06, 2013, 12:32:52 AM
Who else has that as their ringtone?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jul 06, 2013, 12:47:41 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jul 05, 2013, 07:11:39 PM
sup

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fschmoesknow.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F07%2Fjurassicteaser.jpg&hash=1dd54a148cade45416715d9e1ab75c014a56f238)
[close]

UNF
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 06, 2013, 03:04:58 AM
Unfortunately, it's a fake.  Fan-made

http://www.jurassicpark4-movie.com/news/949 (http://www.jurassicpark4-movie.com/news/949)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Jul 06, 2013, 03:05:43 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jul 06, 2013, 03:04:58 AM
Unfortunately, it's a fake.  Fan-made

http://www.jurassicpark4-movie.com/news/949 (http://www.jurassicpark4-movie.com/news/949)
Oh well.  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jul 06, 2013, 03:06:25 AM
DAMN IT.

I now have negative anticipation for this movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 06, 2013, 03:08:10 AM
 ........
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jul 06, 2013, 03:09:36 AM
You're right. I've always had negative anticipation for this movie.


I now have negative-er anticipation for JP4.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 06, 2013, 03:18:44 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ft5ak.roblox.com%2F0f4ded2ccb8de4529aa03a9fb91c88ac&hash=d6eea371dccf5b6643c0acba4f62c8e83b951c11)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jul 06, 2013, 03:20:27 AM
What?
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FwyWs3k4q0JM%2Fhqdefault.jpg%3Ffeature%3Dog&hash=e2bea98e39dea5aeb7b9b9dc33766e83229130f8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jul 06, 2013, 03:23:45 AM
Quote from: TJ Doc on Jul 06, 2013, 12:32:52 AM
Who else has that as their ringtone?

I'm working on it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Jul 06, 2013, 04:01:41 AM
Spare no expense.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 06, 2013, 06:31:33 AM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Jul 05, 2013, 03:59:29 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 05, 2013, 02:44:21 AM
Same as yours, really. Except if I was Tim, I'd have sense enough to not close the door.

YES! THANK YOU! AND TURN THE MOTHERf**kING LIGHT OFF!!!

Yes, but remember too that it wasn't the light that brought the Rex directly to the jeep. The light got its attention but it wasn't until Tim shut the door that it started to poke about.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jul 06, 2013, 07:10:06 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jul 06, 2013, 03:04:58 AM
Unfortunately, it's a fake.  Fan-made

http://www.jurassicpark4-movie.com/news/949 (http://www.jurassicpark4-movie.com/news/949)
And that is why getting excited for this movie is bad for one's health.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jul 06, 2013, 07:16:07 AM
...Motherf**k.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xenokris on Jul 06, 2013, 07:20:04 AM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 05, 2013, 02:28:06 AM
Since we are asking JP questions:

What are your most feared situations to be in from the movies?
Mine would be (in order):

1. Raptors in the Kitchen
2. Waking up to T-rex in the tent
3. Being Tim in the first T-rex attack in the tour vehicle

What are yours?
Being surrounded by a tyranosaurus rex, spinosaurus, a pack of velociraptors, and a dilophosaurus, BTW if this happened to me I would shit myself.  :o :o :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 06, 2013, 07:21:40 AM
I think they'd probably end up going after each other if they were all in the same spot.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xenokris on Jul 06, 2013, 07:41:08 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 06, 2013, 07:21:40 AM
I think they'd probably end up going after each other if they were all in the same spot.
Probably but still pretty f**king terifying, btw wut about being surounded by the one who kills all the others and lives thts equally as scary IMO :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DJ Pu$$yface on Jul 06, 2013, 08:05:58 AM
Quote from: xenokris on Jul 06, 2013, 07:41:08 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 06, 2013, 07:21:40 AM
I think they'd probably end up going after each other if they were all in the same spot.
Probably but still pretty f**king terifying, btw wut about being surounded by the one who kills all the others and lives thts equally as scary IMO :laugh:

Rexes are pretty scary. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 06, 2013, 08:38:22 AM
Okay, so I promised some JP news today and here it is!

A new album is on the way called 'Jurassic Time: Annotated' where yours truly will be playing John Hammond's son alongside Richard Attenborough! It should hopefully expand the JP universe shedding light on aspects of the Parks creation and troubles.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.trescom.org%2Fhosted%2Fscallenger%2Fjurassictime%2FJT%2520A%2520cover%2520small.jpg&hash=bb1c110191b20adf1b9045b7018251b3a41bf5ba)

From Derrick Davis creator of Jurassic Time - "Jurassic Time: Annotated is the collaborative work of both Jack and me. Using the fascinating Hammond script provided by Austin Grossman, Jack has come up with the perfect way to make some of the best of the unrecorded lines of dialogue as part of the audio presentation. A character he created and performed, Thomas, the son of John Hammond, comes across John's memoirs and annotates them. While Thomas reminisces the past of his father, and his involvement, he also recites some of the unrecorded dialogue in the process. This process happens in-between select tracks of John's audio memoir, which has recently been newly excavated. With both of our creativity and love for the Jurassic Park series put together to the test, we hope to bring you all an original, engaging, and insightful look into the life of John Hammond in a way you have never heard before. Jurassic Time is back... and this time, it will stay with you forever."

More information click here...

http://www.trescomforum.org/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=9838 (http://www.trescomforum.org/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=9838)

Listen to an exclusive preview track here!: http://www.trescom.org/hosted/scallenger/jurassictime/JTATest.mp3 (http://www.trescom.org/hosted/scallenger/jurassictime/JTATest.mp3)

Or to listen to previous versions of Jurassic Time click here...

http://jurassictime.trescom.org/ (http://jurassictime.trescom.org/)

This should quench your thirst for more JP related stuff, until JP4 is released that is.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 06, 2013, 08:47:04 AM
This is fantastic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shinawi on Jul 06, 2013, 01:06:01 PM
I watched Jurassic Park today on television. I was surprised at some parts of the movie that I had forgotten before:
1. The dinosaur puppets looked good and realistic.
2. Dr. Alan Grant (Sam Neill) looked very young.
3. Dr. Ellie Sattler looked very interested in Dr. Grant. I wasn't sure about how Dr. Grant felt about her, but it seemed like they might become a couple when I watched the ending of the movie. Jurassic Park III was a letdown for Dr. Grant. I mean the movie is great and I liked the story. I just felt bad for Dr. Grant, although he probably didn't care about being single. I think the next sequel should have him dating a woman who could make us forget about Dr. Sattler. Since Sam Neill is 65, Dr Grant better have a girlfriend.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jul 06, 2013, 01:11:27 PM
Quote from: Shinawi on Jul 06, 2013, 01:06:01 PM
I watched Jurassic Park today on television. I was surprised at some parts of the movie that I had forgotten before:
1. The dinosaur puppets looked good and realistic.
2. Dr. Alan Grant (Sam Neill) looked very young.
3. Dr. Ellie Sattler looked very interested in Dr. Grant. I wasn't sure about how Dr. Grant felt about her, but it seemed like they might become a couple when I watched the ending of the movie. Jurassic Park III was a letdown for Dr. Grant. I mean the movie is great and I liked the story. I just felt bad for Dr. Grant, although he probably didn't care about being single. I think the next sequel should have him dating a woman who could make us forget about Dr. Sattler.

They are together. Or in the very least, it's heavily implied. The most revealing scene is when Malcolm and Alan are alone in the car while it's raining. Malcolm asks if them two are...he trails off and Alan just gives him a look. Then Malcolm apologizes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shinawi on Jul 06, 2013, 01:18:52 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jul 06, 2013, 01:11:27 PM
Quote from: Shinawi on Jul 06, 2013, 01:06:01 PM
I watched Jurassic Park today on television. I was surprised at some parts of the movie that I had forgotten before:
1. The dinosaur puppets looked good and realistic.
2. Dr. Alan Grant (Sam Neill) looked very young.
3. Dr. Ellie Sattler looked very interested in Dr. Grant. I wasn't sure about how Dr. Grant felt about her, but it seemed like they might become a couple when I watched the ending of the movie. Jurassic Park III was a letdown for Dr. Grant. I mean the movie is great and I liked the story. I just felt bad for Dr. Grant, although he probably didn't care about being single. I think the next sequel should have him dating a woman who could make us forget about Dr. Sattler.

They are together. Or in the very least, it's heavily implied. The most revealing scene is when Malcolm and Alan are alone in the car while it's raining. Malcolm asks if them two are...he trails off and Alan just gives him a look. Then Malcolm apologizes.
That made it seem more like they weren't to me. I don't remember that scene clearly. I started to watch the rerun during the kitchen scene with the Velociraptors.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jul 06, 2013, 02:04:23 PM
At the beginning of the movie they are also very couple-ish.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jul 06, 2013, 02:09:14 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 06, 2013, 08:38:22 AM
This should quench your thirst for more JP related stuff, until JP4 is released that is.

I would have really LOVED to listen to this last night. Tossing and turning with Dinosaurs running through the foliage of my brain. Can't wait to hear more about this.

Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jul 06, 2013, 01:11:27 PM
Quote from: Shinawi on Jul 06, 2013, 01:06:01 PM
I watched Jurassic Park today on television. I was surprised at some parts of the movie that I had forgotten before:
1. The dinosaur puppets looked good and realistic.
2. Dr. Alan Grant (Sam Neill) looked very young.
3. Dr. Ellie Sattler looked very interested in Dr. Grant. I wasn't sure about how Dr. Grant felt about her, but it seemed like they might become a couple when I watched the ending of the movie. Jurassic Park III was a letdown for Dr. Grant. I mean the movie is great and I liked the story. I just felt bad for Dr. Grant, although he probably didn't care about being single. I think the next sequel should have him dating a woman who could make us forget about Dr. Sattler.

They are together. Or in the very least, it's heavily implied. The most revealing scene is when Malcolm and Alan are alone in the car while it's raining. Malcolm asks if them two are...he trails off and Alan just gives him a look. Then Malcolm apologizes.

Quote from: Shinawi on Jul 06, 2013, 01:18:52 PM
That made it seem more like they weren't to me. I don't remember that scene clearly. I started to watch the rerun during the kitchen scene with the Velociraptors.

They were together in the film. (Not the book.) They played it like an adult relationship with two professionals in their field. They aren't going to be hanging off each other. Grant does sort of pat, or rather guide Sattler a certain way by gently pushing her ass with his hand. And the exchange with Grant and Malcom was a little more telling with Grant answering "Yes."  Awkwardly adjusts to face Malcom in the seat and then asks "Why?" With the inflected tone of 'back off buddy.'  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomorphine on Jul 06, 2013, 04:54:28 PM
There's also the discussion about having children at the start. Nothing obvious was required. It was all heavily suggested with the response after Goldblum asked if she's single - ironically, leading to them having a real-life relationship, if memory serves correct!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 06, 2013, 05:03:41 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jul 06, 2013, 02:04:23 PM
At the beginning of the movie they are also very couple-ish.
With Alan slowly feeling the surface of Ellie's ass?

No way. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 06, 2013, 05:17:51 PM
She did hook up with Jeff but it didn't last for too long. Can't understand why, I'd lay down for The Goldblum 8)

Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 06, 2013, 08:38:22 AM
Okay, so I promised some JP news today and here it is!

A new album is on the way called 'Jurassic Time: Annotated' where yours truly will be playing John Hammond's son alongside Richard Attenborough! It should hopefully expand the JP universe shedding light on aspects of the Parks creation and troubles.

http://www.trescom.org/hosted/scallenger/jurassictime/JT%20A%20cover%20small.jpg

From Derrick Davis creator of Jurassic Time - "Jurassic Time: Annotated is the collaborative work of both Jack and me. Using the fascinating Hammond script provided by Austin Grossman, Jack has come up with the perfect way to make some of the best of the unrecorded lines of dialogue as part of the audio presentation. A character he created and performed, Thomas, the son of John Hammond, comes across John's memoirs and annotates them. While Thomas reminisces the past of his father, and his involvement, he also recites some of the unrecorded dialogue in the process. This process happens in-between select tracks of John's audio memoir, which has recently been newly excavated. With both of our creativity and love for the Jurassic Park series put together to the test, we hope to bring you all an original, engaging, and insightful look into the life of John Hammond in a way you have never heard before. Jurassic Time is back... and this time, it will stay with you forever."

More information click here...

http://www.trescomforum.org/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=9838 (http://www.trescomforum.org/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=9838)

Listen to an exclusive preview track here!: http://www.trescom.org/hosted/scallenger/jurassictime/JTATest.mp3 (http://www.trescom.org/hosted/scallenger/jurassictime/JTATest.mp3)

Or to listen to previous versions of Jurassic Time click here...

http://jurassictime.trescom.org/ (http://jurassictime.trescom.org/)

This should quench your thirst for more JP related stuff, until JP4 is released that is.

Looking forward to this one!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jul 06, 2013, 08:55:57 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 06, 2013, 08:38:22 AM
Okay, so I promised some JP news today and here it is!

A new album is on the way called 'Jurassic Time: Annotated' where yours truly will be playing John Hammond's son alongside Richard Attenborough! It should hopefully expand the JP universe shedding light on aspects of the Parks creation and troubles.

http://www.trescom.org/hosted/scallenger/jurassictime/JT%20A%20cover%20small.jpg

From Derrick Davis creator of Jurassic Time - "Jurassic Time: Annotated is the collaborative work of both Jack and me. Using the fascinating Hammond script provided by Austin Grossman, Jack has come up with the perfect way to make some of the best of the unrecorded lines of dialogue as part of the audio presentation. A character he created and performed, Thomas, the son of John Hammond, comes across John's memoirs and annotates them. While Thomas reminisces the past of his father, and his involvement, he also recites some of the unrecorded dialogue in the process. This process happens in-between select tracks of John's audio memoir, which has recently been newly excavated. With both of our creativity and love for the Jurassic Park series put together to the test, we hope to bring you all an original, engaging, and insightful look into the life of John Hammond in a way you have never heard before. Jurassic Time is back... and this time, it will stay with you forever."

More information click here...

http://www.trescomforum.org/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=9838 (http://www.trescomforum.org/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=9838)

Listen to an exclusive preview track here!: http://www.trescom.org/hosted/scallenger/jurassictime/JTATest.mp3 (http://www.trescom.org/hosted/scallenger/jurassictime/JTATest.mp3)

Or to listen to previous versions of Jurassic Time click here...

http://jurassictime.trescom.org/ (http://jurassictime.trescom.org/)

This should quench your thirst for more JP related stuff, until JP4 is released that is.

Sweet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shinawi on Jul 07, 2013, 12:48:12 AM
That makes me want to watch the movie again to see what I forgot.
Still, it's sad to see her married to someone else after watching them together and survive through the whole scary experience. It's a similar feeling I had when I watched what happened to Newt and Corporal Hicks. We were anxious to see them survive through Aliens. We waited a long time for the sequel. Then we saw the huge letdown. Their struggle for survival was what got the story moving in my opinion. The beginning of the sequel sapped that energy away. I know that this would be taken as being too picky to other people, but I feel that the next JP film needs to have Dr. Grant date someone who is a better paleontologist than Ellie and who is a survivalist at least as good as Roland Tembo, the big-game hunter from Africa.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 07, 2013, 05:47:53 PM
I'm surprised the writers married Ellie to some random nobody and not even explain why they never tied the knot. Or did they? It's been a few years since I've seen the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 07, 2013, 06:29:32 PM
Beats me too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 07, 2013, 07:34:29 PM
Because shit happens, that's why.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jul 07, 2013, 07:42:07 PM
Probably trying to move a little closer to the novel continuity, in which Ellie marries someone else between JP and TLW. However in JP she was engaged to that person, so the films had already deviated. Does seem a bit odd. Maybe someone decided they didn't want Laura Dern to be a lead character for some reason.

:edit: Or maybe she decided, as a big shoot and publicity junket means a very long time away from home.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 07, 2013, 08:18:16 PM
Check it ;)

http://www.trescom.org/ (http://www.trescom.org/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 07, 2013, 09:01:53 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 07, 2013, 05:47:53 PM
Or did they?
Yet another deleted JP scene the director thought was not needed in the film... only to leave fans blundered and frustrated years later ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jul 08, 2013, 12:03:14 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 07, 2013, 07:42:07 PM
Probably trying to move a little closer to the novel continuity, in which Ellie marries someone else between JP and TLW. However in JP she was engaged to that person, so the films had already deviated. Does seem a bit odd. Maybe someone decided they didn't want Laura Dern to be a lead character for some reason.

:edit: Or maybe she decided, as a big shoot and publicity junket means a very long time away from home.

I was going to say that. In the first book they mention she is engaged to someone else.

Anyways, even though it's sad I feel it's a bit realistic. More often than not, i hear people that survive a terrible ordeal as they did become grim reminders of that incident. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2013, 05:07:07 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 07, 2013, 08:18:16 PM
Check it ;)

http://www.trescom.org/ (http://www.trescom.org/)

I'm definitely interested in the Jack Horner question thing. I have a few I'd like to shoot him, myself.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 09, 2013, 05:35:10 AM
Just got JP and TLW 1st edition publications on order, as well as all 3 scores.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shinawi on Jul 09, 2013, 12:06:58 PM
I rewatched JP III on DVD. I noticed something about Ellie that I had forgotten before. She clearly enjoys Dr. Grant's presence. And they had an exciting conversation about Velociraptors. When he said that her husband was a nice guy, Ellie didn't look enthusiastic. She looked very sad when she watched Dr. Grant leave - very interesting.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2013, 03:58:58 PM
Maybe Jurassic Park IV will have divorce proceedings.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Jul 09, 2013, 05:38:23 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2013, 03:58:58 PM
Maybe Jurassic Park IV will have divorce proceedings.

After Ellie's appearance in JP3, I'd be very happy just not having her awkwardly stuck in the next film. The scenes in 3 weren't bad, kind of amusing, until she called the marines... ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Jul 09, 2013, 06:12:59 PM
Apparently it's fake, but here's a better look at that poster.

http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/this-may-be-the-low-res-teaser-poster-for-jurassic-park-iv (http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/this-may-be-the-low-res-teaser-poster-for-jurassic-park-iv)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.joblo.com%2Fnewsimages1%2Ffake-jp4-poster.jpg&hash=fc6bf325f02082078013fa7e9e275939393287c2)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shinawi on Jul 10, 2013, 03:46:49 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2013, 03:58:58 PM
Maybe Jurassic Park IV will have divorce proceedings.
JP III had a lot of that theme going on. Look at the couple who hired Dr. Grant as their guide. Maybe the writer/director knows people close to him who went through this sort of thing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jul 10, 2013, 03:55:06 AM
Quote from: Shasvre on Jul 09, 2013, 06:12:59 PM
Apparently it's fake, but here's a better look at that poster.

http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/this-may-be-the-low-res-teaser-poster-for-jurassic-park-iv (http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/this-may-be-the-low-res-teaser-poster-for-jurassic-park-iv)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.joblo.com%2Fnewsimages1%2Ffake-jp4-poster.jpg&hash=fc6bf325f02082078013fa7e9e275939393287c2)

Still gorgeous.


Hopefully, this leads to an even better JP4 poster that's official.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jul 10, 2013, 04:24:57 AM
They should just pay that guy or something and use that freaking poster.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jul 10, 2013, 04:29:10 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jul 10, 2013, 04:24:57 AM
They should just pay that guy or something and use that freaking poster.

Yeah...I mean it's really, really, good.


Anything less for hte official JP4 poster would be shameful.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shinawi on Jul 10, 2013, 02:42:06 PM
The movie better live up to its poster.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 10, 2013, 03:36:40 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Jul 10, 2013, 04:29:10 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jul 10, 2013, 04:24:57 AM
They should just pay that guy or something and use that freaking poster.

Yeah...I mean it's really, really, good.


Anything less for hte official JP4 poster would be shameful.

Don't be surprised if the official poster ends up simply being the new JP logo against a solid background. The Jurassic Park series seems pretty set in its designs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jul 10, 2013, 03:49:07 PM
Quote from: RagingDragon on Jul 09, 2013, 05:38:23 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2013, 03:58:58 PM
Maybe Jurassic Park IV will have divorce proceedings.

After Ellie's appearance in JP3, I'd be very happy just not having her awkwardly stuck in the next film. The scenes in 3 weren't bad, kind of amusing, until she called the marines... ::)

I didn't quite get that either. A civilian calls the marines, and they're right on it, showing up all like "MERICA! F**K YEA!" on the beach over a few idiots that ignored flight restrictions, a boy that had been gone for months (I guess previously no shits were given), and a poor sucker that bought the innocent story of the idiots. Everyone else died besides Mr. Best Intentions who was magically rescued by Team America sometime after he was floating away under attack by pterodactyls.

Spoiler
A     L     A     N

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_lie0gzSymq1qbnhnpo1_400.gif&hash=2c8e1a952263cd134157de380ea73fa7350c3249)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9C9K6aEpMo# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9C9K6aEpMo#)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jul 10, 2013, 04:02:00 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 10, 2013, 03:36:40 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Jul 10, 2013, 04:29:10 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jul 10, 2013, 04:24:57 AM
They should just pay that guy or something and use that freaking poster.

Yeah...I mean it's really, really, good.


Anything less for hte official JP4 poster would be shameful.

Don't be surprised if the official poster ends up simply being the new JP logo against a solid background. The Jurassic Park series seems pretty set in its designs.

Ugh...



Also:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7KjB-_bjOJs#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7KjB-_bjOJs#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Jul 10, 2013, 06:45:09 PM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Jul 10, 2013, 03:49:07 PM
I didn't quite get that either. A civilian calls the marines, and they're right on it, showing up all like "MERICA! F**K YEA!" on the beach over a few idiots that ignored flight restrictions, a boy that had been gone for months (I guess previously no shits were given), and a poor sucker that bought the innocent story of the idiots. Everyone else died besides Mr. Best Intentions who was magically rescued by Team America sometime after he was floating away under attack by pterodactyls.

Spoiler
A     L     A     N

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_lie0gzSymq1qbnhnpo1_400.gif&hash=2c8e1a952263cd134157de380ea73fa7350c3249)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9C9K6aEpMo# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9C9K6aEpMo#)
[close]
Lolol quite the analysis, Sir Rich! If only the film were so cunning and attentive to detail!

But no, here we are, durr hurr hurr: DUR DUR DURRR!! DUR DURRRR!!
(Start listening at around :50 for maximum weakness)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRwhl_rH0uY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRwhl_rH0uY#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 11, 2013, 01:11:56 AM
Got two of my JP scores!  Now I feel like watching JPIII on Blu Ray
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Jul 11, 2013, 08:21:25 AM
ALAN.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 11, 2013, 09:23:52 AM
I don't agree with everything said here but this is entertaining.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFNiS8-rUU0#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFNiS8-rUU0#ws)


Quote from: Aspie on Jul 10, 2013, 04:02:00 PM
Also:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7KjB-_bjOJs#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7KjB-_bjOJs#ws)

So much wrong with this video.

It's funny, but why it ruffles my feathers is because there are people out there who'll take the points raised in that video seriously, then go around spreading the filth. I KNOW THIS AS FACT. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jul 11, 2013, 01:08:34 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ju75yrHQtNE# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ju75yrHQtNE#)

:laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 11, 2013, 01:53:38 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 11, 2013, 09:23:52 AM
I don't agree with everything said here but this is entertaining.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFNiS8-rUU0#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFNiS8-rUU0#ws)

Pretty entertaining, but why that much hate for the third?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Jul 11, 2013, 01:56:15 PM
If he really cried when the T-Rex was killed (hopefully he's joking), I will personally take his Man Card.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 11, 2013, 05:33:18 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jul 11, 2013, 01:53:38 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 11, 2013, 09:23:52 AM
I don't agree with everything said here but this is entertaining.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFNiS8-rUU0#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFNiS8-rUU0#ws)

Pretty entertaining, but why that much hate for the third?

Haters gonna hate.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jul 13, 2013, 12:07:29 PM
Quote from: Virgil on Jul 13, 2013, 10:54:23 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.latinospost.com%2Fdata%2Fimages%2Ffull%2F24024%2Fjurassic-park-4.jpg%3Fw%3D600&hash=e088cd59119ab084f602743a1dd269342855de15)

'Jurassic Park 4' Movie News Update: First Poster Revealed! Film To Be Featured At Comic-Con

Full article: http://www.latinospost.com/articles/23392/20130711/jurassic-park-4-movie-news-update-first-poster-revealed-film.htm (http://www.latinospost.com/articles/23392/20130711/jurassic-park-4-movie-news-update-first-poster-revealed-film.htm)

Really dude? All you had to do was go back a few pages  ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Virgil on Jul 13, 2013, 12:36:58 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jul 13, 2013, 12:07:29 PM
Quote from: Virgil on Jul 13, 2013, 10:54:23 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.latinospost.com%2Fdata%2Fimages%2Ffull%2F24024%2Fjurassic-park-4.jpg%3Fw%3D600&hash=e088cd59119ab084f602743a1dd269342855de15)

'Jurassic Park 4' Movie News Update: First Poster Revealed! Film To Be Featured At Comic-Con

Full article: http://www.latinospost.com/articles/23392/20130711/jurassic-park-4-movie-news-update-first-poster-revealed-film.htm (http://www.latinospost.com/articles/23392/20130711/jurassic-park-4-movie-news-update-first-poster-revealed-film.htm)

Really dude? All you had to do was go back a few pages  ::)

Ha! My apologies, I only just saw the poster this morning. Still a great design even if its fake.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jul 13, 2013, 01:29:15 PM
It's all good we also got excited  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 13, 2013, 01:56:02 PM
I've just uploaded this new YouTube video...

'The Lost World: Jurassic Park' Retrospective.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiVeOp9_6lY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiVeOp9_6lY#ws)

Enjoy :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 13, 2013, 04:31:53 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 13, 2013, 01:56:02 PM
I've just uploaded this new YouTube video...

'The Lost World: Jurassic Park' Retrospective.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiVeOp9_6lY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiVeOp9_6lY#ws)

Enjoy :D

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.maniacworld.com%2Finternet-high-five.jpg&hash=0bc64bb713af067977cbb026b6bb534a96475642)

Awesome video Alien3, I really liked it :)
As for the dead crew, you may have heard too that one explanation was that there were supposed to be raptors on-board as well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 13, 2013, 05:13:35 PM
Yeah, I have heard through the grape vine.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shinawi on Jul 14, 2013, 01:11:38 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 13, 2013, 01:56:02 PM
I've just uploaded this new YouTube video...

'The Lost World: Jurassic Park' Retrospective.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiVeOp9_6lY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiVeOp9_6lY#ws)

Enjoy :D
Before I read Michael Chrichton's novel, I read Arthur Conan Doyle's The Lost World. Conan Doyle is the same author who wrote the Sherlock Holmes stories. He writes in a very descriptive first-person narrative. Even though the story getting to the dinosaur area is long, I enjoyed his vivid descriptions of the characters, the rain forest and the fauna. I was a kid at that time and had never read a book like that before. A few years later, I was fascinated by a National Geographic article about the tepuis in South America and that Conan Doyle's story was based on one of those tepuis. I read his novel when I was visiting New Zealand with my family. A large forest region of New Zealand looks prehistoric. It made the novel seem more realistic to me.
Spoiler
Btw, unlike the old 1925 film, the escaped creature in London is a pterodactyl, not a Brontosaurus.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jul 14, 2013, 01:39:51 PM
Yeah, I really enjoyed Doyle's The Lost World, as well. Much more tongue-in-cheek and lighthearted than the Holmes stories. Just a blast to read.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jul 14, 2013, 01:41:31 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 13, 2013, 01:56:02 PM
I've just uploaded this new YouTube video...

'The Lost World: Jurassic Park' Retrospective.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiVeOp9_6lY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiVeOp9_6lY#ws)

Enjoy :D

Great video man! And yeah, I agree for the most part about the events in the Venture. I had always seen it like you did, except the torn hand. It's the only thing that I can't see happening. I don't buy it  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jul 16, 2013, 03:53:43 PM
Sam Neill, ladies and "gentle" men.

http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/351628/description/News_in_Brief_T_rex_hunted_live_prey (http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/351628/description/News_in_Brief_T_rex_hunted_live_prey)

https://twitter.com/TwoPaddocks/status/357163407478243328 (https://twitter.com/TwoPaddocks/status/357163407478243328)

QuoteYes, like many of you I'm heartened by the news that T Rex was indeed a predator & not a mere scavenger eating road kill .#DignityRestored
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jul 16, 2013, 04:43:13 PM
Haha! Maybe he nipped it thinking it was dead :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 16, 2013, 05:08:10 PM
Old news.

Like terribly old news. I've heard of the bitten duck-billed dinosaur aeons ago.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 16, 2013, 05:43:23 PM
Or the Triceratops with the healed frill wound.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 16, 2013, 05:45:24 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Jul 16, 2013, 03:53:43 PM
QuoteYes, like many of you I'm heartened by the news that T Rex was indeed a predator & not a mere scavenger eating road kill .#DignityRestored
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.qkme.me%2F3qrgty.jpg&hash=5ba939da44220cbefd131784c7cb1df34a51f1d2)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 16, 2013, 06:01:01 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 16, 2013, 05:43:23 PM
Or the Triceratops with the healed frill wound.
Exactly!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jul 16, 2013, 08:23:04 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Jul 16, 2013, 03:53:43 PM
Sam Neill, ladies and "gentle" men.

http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/351628/description/News_in_Brief_T_rex_hunted_live_prey (http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/351628/description/News_in_Brief_T_rex_hunted_live_prey)

https://twitter.com/TwoPaddocks/status/357163407478243328 (https://twitter.com/TwoPaddocks/status/357163407478243328)

QuoteYes, like many of you I'm heartened by the news that T Rex was indeed a predator & not a mere scavenger eating road kill .#DignityRestored

Sam Neill I love you.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 17, 2013, 06:25:10 AM
I wonder where Jack Horner is right now, lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 17, 2013, 03:28:52 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 17, 2013, 06:25:10 AM
I wonder where Jack Horner is right now, lol

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fjayoung11.files.wordpress.com%2F2012%2F04%2Ftrex-claw-and-stomach-copy.jpg%3Fw%3D900&hash=76af8909a5c7f03a3998d110a1bccf74158aff8b)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jul 17, 2013, 03:35:59 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jul 17, 2013, 03:28:52 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 17, 2013, 06:25:10 AM
I wonder where Jack Horner is right now, lol

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fjayoung11.files.wordpress.com%2F2012%2F04%2Ftrex-claw-and-stomach-copy.jpg%3Fw%3D900&hash=76af8909a5c7f03a3998d110a1bccf74158aff8b)

Hell yeah.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jul 17, 2013, 04:04:51 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jul 17, 2013, 03:28:52 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 17, 2013, 06:25:10 AM
I wonder where Jack Horner is right now, lol

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fjayoung11.files.wordpress.com%2F2012%2F04%2Ftrex-claw-and-stomach-copy.jpg%3Fw%3D900&hash=76af8909a5c7f03a3998d110a1bccf74158aff8b)

Nice  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 17, 2013, 07:00:01 PM
As promised, here is my video about the Jurassic Park Laserdiscs.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ll1hZ1fREQE#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ll1hZ1fREQE#ws)

Enjoy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jul 17, 2013, 07:02:09 PM
You have a voice made for radio :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 17, 2013, 07:11:42 PM
Or YouTube? ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 17, 2013, 07:22:54 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Jul 17, 2013, 07:02:09 PM
You have a voice made for radio :P

And you have a face made for radio :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jul 17, 2013, 07:25:41 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 17, 2013, 07:22:54 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Jul 17, 2013, 07:02:09 PM
You have a voice made for radio :P

And you have a face made for radio :)

How about for the news?


This is my good side:
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.mlive.com%2Fentertainment_impact%2Fphoto%2F11214481-large.jpg&hash=ecbf14e6bf66efe6581dd9beb8b784e042166bd1)
[close]

And this side too:
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fnypress.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F08%2Fthe-newsroom-jeff-daniels_510.jpg&hash=7a833d5cf18edad2f222cddae1febb310eaef4ed)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 17, 2013, 09:19:19 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jul 17, 2013, 03:28:52 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 17, 2013, 06:25:10 AM
I wonder where Jack Horner is right now, lol

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fjayoung11.files.wordpress.com%2F2012%2F04%2Ftrex-claw-and-stomach-copy.jpg%3Fw%3D900&hash=76af8909a5c7f03a3998d110a1bccf74158aff8b)

Ha! Word up 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 17, 2013, 09:19:26 PM
Thanks for the rundown on the Laserdisc version, Jack  :)

Btw, it's been asked plenty of times everywhere, but are you guys hoping for some JP4 material at SDCC?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 17, 2013, 09:23:26 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jul 17, 2013, 09:19:26 PM
Thanks for the rundown on the Laserdisc version, Jack  :)

Btw, it's been asked plenty of times everywhere, but are you guys hoping for some JP4 material at SDCC?

No problem!

And heck yes we're hoping for something from SDCC! Casting update I hope.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 17, 2013, 11:08:31 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 17, 2013, 07:00:01 PM
As promised, here is my video about the Jurassic Park Laserdiscs.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ll1hZ1fREQE#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ll1hZ1fREQE#ws)

Enjoy.
Nice review, damn those Blu rays (and DVDs) for cutting out the special little things you would see in the theater!

Also,  :'( for no extra scenes or extended scenes. We will get them one day, I am PATIENTLY waiting (as are you and millions of JP fans worldwide)....
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 18, 2013, 03:31:55 AM
Just wanted to post this beautiful image in a higher than normal resolution....

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Flibrary.creativecow.net%2Farticles%2Fkaufman_debra%2FJurassic-Park-3D-Conversion%2Fassets%2FDinosaur-Flares.jpg&hash=2698c4e5745321e937d5eb73b96ac6778e642e6f)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jul 18, 2013, 04:40:25 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jul 18, 2013, 03:31:55 AM
Just wanted to post this beautiful image in a higher than normal resolution....

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Flibrary.creativecow.net%2Farticles%2Fkaufman_debra%2FJurassic-Park-3D-Conversion%2Fassets%2FDinosaur-Flares.jpg&hash=2698c4e5745321e937d5eb73b96ac6778e642e6f)

Sig material right there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 18, 2013, 07:29:53 AM
Related to JP, I have to say that lately I've been discouraged from buying new toys on eBay. All of a sudden, mandatory "import charges" that didn't exist before have cropped up and added unnecessarily to the price of toys and lots that would otherwise not cost an arm and leg to buy. f**king greedy bastards.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 18, 2013, 08:30:36 AM
That's because JP4's been announced and Jurassic Park is coming back.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 18, 2013, 08:33:58 AM
I don't see what that has to do with extra shipping fees.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 18, 2013, 08:35:20 AM
People can make more money off JP products because they're hot property again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 18, 2013, 08:45:06 AM
I still don't think that's it. Not every seller has implemented this new Global Shipping Program which introduced these new charges.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 18, 2013, 08:49:18 AM
Which means only a few companies had the idea to bump up the shipping prices. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shinawi on Jul 22, 2013, 04:27:29 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jul 08, 2013, 12:03:14 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 07, 2013, 07:42:07 PM
Probably trying to move a little closer to the novel continuity, in which Ellie marries someone else between JP and TLW. However in JP she was engaged to that person, so the films had already deviated. Does seem a bit odd. Maybe someone decided they didn't want Laura Dern to be a lead character for some reason.

:edit: Or maybe she decided, as a big shoot and publicity junket means a very long time away from home.

I was going to say that. In the first book they mention she is engaged to someone else.

Anyways, even though it's sad I feel it's a bit realistic. More often than not, i hear people that survive a terrible ordeal as they did become grim reminders of that incident.
I can see that happening.
Maybe if he saved her life then she would've stayed with him. From what I recall, it was more like them helping each other out.
Here's a couple who had a different outcome from the Aurora tragedy: http://news.yahoo.com/aurora-survivors-marry-on-one-year-anniversary-of-massacre-164618047.html (http://news.yahoo.com/aurora-survivors-marry-on-one-year-anniversary-of-massacre-164618047.html)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 22, 2013, 04:31:47 AM
Apparently,  Trevorrow is still writing the script.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 24, 2013, 12:52:21 PM
Question: can anyone tell me what the hell Nedry did to himself after the Dilo attack, when he scrambled back to the Jeep? I mean, how did he knock himself out? I can't tell if he hit his head on the door frame or if he somehow punched himself too hard in the chest.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jul 24, 2013, 01:49:18 PM
Rammed his head into the doorframe in a panicked attempt to get away.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 24, 2013, 02:11:13 PM
OK. It looked pretty gentle though. He wasn't exactly running at full speed in those few short steps.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 24, 2013, 02:15:39 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.feoamante.com%2FMovies%2FJ%2FJurassic_Park%2FJP4%2FJP4NRMP.jpg&hash=9789af65426f9333c58fef5470ffa5bfc358cd81)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 24, 2013, 03:04:25 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 24, 2013, 02:15:39 PM
http://www.feoamante.com/Movies/J/Jurassic_Park/JP4/JP4NRMP.jpg

Lol.  I remember that from years ago.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Jul 24, 2013, 03:25:11 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 24, 2013, 02:15:39 PM
http://www.feoamante.com/Movies/J/Jurassic_Park/JP4/JP4NRMP.jpg

:laugh:

There's our sequel. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jul 25, 2013, 07:01:20 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 24, 2013, 02:11:13 PM
OK. It looked pretty gentle though. He wasn't exactly running at full speed in those few short steps.

I think it was a combination of his panic, the impact, the toxin in his eyes, and the slick mud underfoot that made him fall.

He was never unconscious, though, as far as I can remember. Just fell over, scrambled for a bit, then got into the jeep.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 26, 2013, 02:08:35 AM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 24, 2013, 02:15:39 PM
http://www.feoamante.com/Movies/J/Jurassic_Park/JP4/JP4NRMP.jpg

Haha, all my money!!!

Quote from: SpaceMarines on Jul 25, 2013, 07:01:20 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 24, 2013, 02:11:13 PM
OK. It looked pretty gentle though. He wasn't exactly running at full speed in those few short steps.

I think it was a combination of his panic, the impact, the toxin in his eyes, and the slick mud underfoot that made him fall.

He was never unconscious, though, as far as I can remember. Just fell over, scrambled for a bit, then got into the jeep.

Yeah, you're right about him falling over. Either way, it made for great (unintentional) physical comedy. Especially because he was fat.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jul 26, 2013, 02:09:28 AM
Yep.

I always loved the little "zweep!" sound as he tumbled. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 26, 2013, 02:23:03 AM
Oh yeah, lol! When he fell down the hill :D
I know common sense has no place in movies but when the Dilo was right at his feet, you'd think a sensible person would give it a good, hard kick in the mouth then scramble for the car. This of course would happen before the frill flared up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jul 26, 2013, 03:35:56 AM
Keep in mind, that's probably the most nature Nedry had seen in his entire life. Just bewildered by all the green.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 26, 2013, 03:45:15 AM
"No wonder you're extinct. I'm gonna run over when I come back down!"
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Jul 26, 2013, 02:09:28 AM
Yep.

I always loved the little "zweep!" sound as he tumbled. :laugh:
Spielberg does add a little cartoonish humor at random points in his flicks.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 26, 2013, 11:37:25 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Jul 26, 2013, 03:35:56 AM
Keep in mind, that's probably the most nature Nedry had seen in his entire life. Just bewildered by all the green.

Not unless he spent time swimming in the oceans with the whales.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jul 27, 2013, 01:05:51 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 26, 2013, 11:37:25 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Jul 26, 2013, 03:35:56 AM
Keep in mind, that's probably the most nature Nedry had seen in his entire life. Just bewildered by all the green.

Not unless he spent time swimming in the oceans with the whales.

That would explain his experience in whale language.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scOPfElE61A# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scOPfElE61A#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 27, 2013, 05:31:30 AM
 :D exactly, he blew that one out of his hidden blowhole.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jul 27, 2013, 01:44:55 PM
I'm just wondering what animals Goldblum lived with, enabling him to create those f**king sounds.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 27, 2013, 01:52:02 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Jul 27, 2013, 01:44:55 PM
I'm just wondering what animals Goldblum lived with, enabling him to create those f**king sounds.

When he installed the virus on the alien mothership. they gave him a little something in return.
Title: The 200 Things We Learned From Jurassic Park/TLW/JP3 films
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 28, 2013, 10:48:33 PM
I thought this would be a fun topic since many of us (if not all) are Jurassic Park fans! I will start us off...

1. Never apply for the gatekeeper position at Jurassic Park. (JP)
2. John Hammond doesn't care for lawyers. (JP)
3. In 48 hours Hammond will be accepting your apology. (JP)
4. There aren't any snakes on the beach. (TLW)
5. Taking dinosaurs off this island is the worst idea in the long sad history of bad ideas and Malcolm will be there when you learn it.(TLW)
6.  Carnivores hunt on game trails. (TLW)
7. Roland has the highest and rarest fee in the history of hunting. (TLW)
8. Isla Sorna is a RESTRICTED area. (JP3)
9. Dr. Grant was not in San Diego to witness the events that happened there. (JP3)
10. Billy cares more about an old hat than the fact he nearly died. (JP3)

Let the list continue! :)
Title: Re: The 200 Things We Learned From Jurassic Park/TLW/JP3 films
Post by: Aspie on Jul 28, 2013, 10:49:53 PM
11. Hollywood should stop making dinosaur films
Title: Re: The 200 Things We Learned From Jurassic Park/TLW/JP3 films
Post by: KNIGHT on Jul 28, 2013, 10:59:02 PM
12. ALAN! (JP3)
Title: Re: The 200 Things We Learned From Jurassic Park/TLW/JP3 films
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 28, 2013, 11:05:38 PM
13. Life finds a way.
14. The scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could that they didn't stop to think if they should.
15. She's, uh... tenacious.
16. Dinosaurs had their shot, and nature selected them for extinction.
17. Ellie Sattler must be familiar with the concept of attraction.
18. Must go faster!
19. Ian Malcolm is one of the most quotable characters in film history.
Title: Re: The 200 Things We Learned From Jurassic Park/TLW/JP3 films
Post by: First Blood on Jul 28, 2013, 11:25:27 PM
20. You are alive when they start to eat you. So uh..show a little respect.
Title: Re: The 200 Things We Learned From Jurassic Park/TLW/JP3 films
Post by: SM on Jul 29, 2013, 12:33:25 AM
21. You probably won't get off this island alive.
Title: Re: The 200 Things We Learned From Jurassic Park/TLW/JP3 films
Post by: First Blood on Jul 29, 2013, 01:06:58 AM
22. Dodgson, we've got Dodgson here!

23. Nobody cares.
Title: Re: The 200 Things We Learned From Jurassic Park/TLW/JP3 films
Post by: Alienseseses on Jul 29, 2013, 01:45:57 AM
24. I like cows
Title: Re: The 200 Things We Learned From Jurassic Park/TLW/JP3 films
Post by: Space Invader on Jul 29, 2013, 01:59:37 AM
25. You can't get Jurassic Park back online without Dennis Nedry.
Title: Re: The 200 Things We Learned From Jurassic Park/TLW/JP3 films
Post by: Alienseseses on Jul 29, 2013, 02:16:02 AM
26. Mumble mumble chaos theory mumble mumble.
Title: Re: The 200 Things We Learned From Jurassic Park/TLW/JP3 films
Post by: KNIGHT on Jul 29, 2013, 02:47:37 AM
27. Before the even knew what they had, they patented it, and packaged it, and slapped it on a plastic lunchbox and now, they're selling it, they're selling it, well.
Title: Re: The 200 Things We Learned From Jurassic Park/TLW/JP3 films
Post by: SIMULANT on Jul 29, 2013, 02:49:57 AM
28. Samuel L Jacksons Arm will be there to comfort you in your time of need (Unfortunately the rest of him is being digested)
Title: Re: The 200 Things We Learned From Jurassic Park/TLW/JP3 films
Post by: Alienseseses on Jul 29, 2013, 02:53:49 AM
29. Raptors are clever, and girls.
Title: Re: The 200 Things We Learned From Jurassic Park/TLW/JP3 films
Post by: KNIGHT on Jul 29, 2013, 02:55:03 AM
30. Frog DNA leads to apparent sex change.
Title: Re: The 200 Things We Learned From Jurassic Park/TLW/JP3 films
Post by: Blacklabel on Jul 29, 2013, 03:35:48 AM
31. HOLD ONTO YOUR BUTTS!
Title: Re: The 200 Things We Learned From Jurassic Park/TLW/JP3 films
Post by: SIMULANT on Jul 29, 2013, 03:37:59 AM
32. Storms cause problems...
Title: Re: The 200 Things We Learned From Jurassic Park/TLW/JP3 films
Post by: First Blood on Jul 29, 2013, 03:38:17 AM
33. Don't go into the long-grass.

Title: Re: The 200 Things We Learned From Jurassic Park/TLW/JP3 films
Post by: Blacklabel on Jul 29, 2013, 03:40:02 AM
34. Never hide in a bathroom during a T-Rex attack.
Title: Re: The 200 Things We Learned From Jurassic Park/TLW/JP3 films
Post by: Alienseseses on Jul 29, 2013, 03:40:29 AM
35. Spit. Gross, I meant your gum.
Title: Re: The 200 Things We Learned From Jurassic Park/TLW/JP3 films
Post by: Xenomorphine on Jul 29, 2013, 03:53:43 AM
Think you can get away with makin' new topics?! Huh?! Think again!

Merged! By way of the Moderator Dawg (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8QyNB7CYGU#ws), bro!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jul 29, 2013, 03:54:52 AM
This is Ikarop's doing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomorphine on Jul 29, 2013, 03:55:56 AM
Bear mace him!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jul 29, 2013, 03:57:41 AM
Shoo, get away Ikarop. There are no Aspies residing in this camp.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fthepuregallery.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F10%2Fbear533.jpg&hash=7d018b9ac44d40ac183dd6ad69feb620a0265dfa)
Title: Re: The 200 Things We Learned From Jurassic Park/TLW/JP3 films
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jul 29, 2013, 04:25:22 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Jul 29, 2013, 03:38:17 AM
33. Don't go into the long-grass.

I was going to quote that one. Since I always yell that out when I'm playing online with friends or when it seems sort of appropriate  :P Love yelling that xD
Title: Re: The 200 Things We Learned From Jurassic Park/TLW/JP3 films
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 29, 2013, 05:00:45 AM
Quote from: Alienseseses on Jul 29, 2013, 03:40:29 AM
35. Spit. Gross, I meant your gum.

36. This is a game trail, Dinosaurs hunt on game trails.

37. You want to set up a base camp, not a buffet.

38. Roland has spent enough time in the company of death.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 29, 2013, 11:25:16 AM
39. Be mindful of your employees' financial problems, even if they are his or her problem(s)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 29, 2013, 03:13:15 PM
40. Taste test the cream on your pie first.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Jul 29, 2013, 04:27:34 PM
Man, this is great, but sneaky topic change is sneaky. :laugh:

41. T Rex doesn't want to be fed, he wants to hunt.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 29, 2013, 04:32:50 PM
42. The Rex just fed, so let's get this moveable feast on the way.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 29, 2013, 04:47:56 PM
Quote from: RagingDragon on Jul 29, 2013, 04:27:34 PM
Man, this is great, but sneaky topic change is sneaky. :laugh:
I created a new topic but it got moved to here :P While I am here:

43. We are going to make a fortune with this place. (JP)
44. Those are some major league toys. (TLW)
45. It's nothing you haven't seen before. (JP3)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Jul 29, 2013, 04:49:13 PM
46. T-Rex's hate(eat) dogs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 29, 2013, 04:50:21 PM
47. They left Japan to get away from this.
Title: Re: The 200 Things We Learned From Jurassic Park/TLW/JP3 films
Post by: Shasvre on Jul 29, 2013, 04:52:50 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Jul 29, 2013, 03:38:17 AM
33. Don't go into the long-grass.

Damn it, that was the first thing that came to mind! :laugh: :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 29, 2013, 04:53:23 PM
48. Violence and technology- not good bedfellows!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Jul 29, 2013, 04:55:08 PM
49. It's never a good idea to make a zoo with the most deadly predators the world has known.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 29, 2013, 04:59:36 PM
50. Malcolm hates being right all the time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 29, 2013, 05:18:05 PM
51.  Where you're going is the only place in the world where the geese chase you.
52.  You'd actually be put at a very convenient "biting height" (with the High-Hide)
53. Oo-ahhhh, that's how it always starts.  Then there's running....and screaming.
54. Mommy's very angry.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Jul 29, 2013, 05:21:38 PM
55. The crazy son of a bitch did it. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 29, 2013, 06:27:45 PM
Quote from: Cal427eb on Jul 29, 2013, 04:55:08 PM
49. It's never a good idea to make a zoo with the most deadly predators the world has known.

I hate to be pedantic but technically, it was those predators who made the zoo. The second deadliest were the ones on exhibit ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Jul 29, 2013, 06:41:58 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 29, 2013, 06:27:45 PM
Quote from: Cal427eb on Jul 29, 2013, 04:55:08 PM
49. It's never a good idea to make a zoo with the most deadly predators the world has known.

I hate to be pedantic but technically, it was those predators who made the zoo. The second deadliest were the ones on exhibit ;)
I c wut u did there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Jul 29, 2013, 07:08:44 PM
56. Dennis Nedry is gonna run you over when he comes back down.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jul 29, 2013, 07:15:10 PM
57. With the best intentions? Some of the worst things imaginable have been done with the best intentions.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 29, 2013, 07:18:50 PM
58.  Hold on to your eggs.  You don't want to be caught with out them.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 29, 2013, 07:30:38 PM
59. We're in the worst place in the world and we're not even being paid for it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Eva on Jul 29, 2013, 07:50:12 PM
60. 'Make sure to have... uh... dinosaurs in your dinosaur park.'
61. 'Ian Malcolm is always on the lookout for a future ex-Mrs. Malcolm.'
62. 'Dr Grant and Dr. Sattler are scientists. Ian Malcolm is a rockstar.'
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SIMULANT on Jul 29, 2013, 09:39:09 PM
63. making breakfast for everything will make it ok when your found out that you've stowed away
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 29, 2013, 09:41:46 PM
64. We could have a... coupon day.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Jul 29, 2013, 09:52:12 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Jul 29, 2013, 07:08:44 PM
56. Dennis Nedry is gonna run you over when he comes back down.
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

65. We'll have landed by the time you get it right.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alienseseses on Jul 29, 2013, 09:56:37 PM
66. We left Japan to get away from this!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 30, 2013, 04:17:35 AM
Quote from: RagingDragon on Jul 29, 2013, 09:52:12 PM
65. We'll have landed by the time you get it right.

67.  We haven't landed yet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 30, 2013, 04:45:52 AM
68. Flashlight batteries are totally compatible with camcorders.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 30, 2013, 07:09:17 AM
69. Make Nedry jump with a embryo carrying Barbasol can and he'll squeal a high pitched roar.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F24.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_lve01eIxFp1r7r1l7o1_400.gif&hash=3600ba941e9929e96c9079637971eb3f3fd86e02)

Spoiler
Quote from: Aspie on Jul 28, 2013, 10:49:53 PM
11. Hollywood should stop making Adam Sandler films

Fixed.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jul 30, 2013, 12:17:14 PM
70. SHOOT HER!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 30, 2013, 01:53:22 PM
71. Wes should install locking mechanisms on the vehicle doors.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Jul 30, 2013, 04:08:28 PM
72. Some of them smell. Babies smell.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ghost Rider on Jul 30, 2013, 04:10:46 PM
73. They have a T-Rex.
Title: Re: The 200 Things We Learned From Jurassic Park/TLW/JP3 films
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jul 30, 2013, 04:19:23 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 28, 2013, 11:05:38 PM
13. Life finds a way.
14. The scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could that they didn't stop to think if they should.
15. She's, uh... tenacious.
16. Dinosaurs had their shot, and nature selected them for extinction.
17. Ellie Sattler must be familiar with the concept of attraction.
18. Must go faster!
19. Ian Malcolm is one of the most quotable characters in film history.

74.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBxgAmdPQWg#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBxgAmdPQWg#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 30, 2013, 05:02:37 PM
75. You'll have to get used to Dr. Malcolm.
76. He suffers from a plural excess of personality, especially for a mathematician.
77. Chaoitician, Chaoitician actually. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ghost Rider on Jul 30, 2013, 05:06:16 PM
78. John doesn't subscribe to Chaos.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 30, 2013, 05:16:22 PM
79. No one could have predicted the Dr. Grant would suddenly jump out of a moving vehicle.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jul 30, 2013, 05:22:06 PM
80. And now I'm, uh, sitting by myself, uh, talking, ah, talking to myself.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ghost Rider on Jul 30, 2013, 05:23:08 PM
81. Now that's, that's Chaos Theory.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 30, 2013, 05:39:50 PM
82. Fine, don't listen - but if that Tricycloplots comes and attacks you don't come crying to me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 30, 2013, 05:48:04 PM
83. A blind dinosaur is called doyouthinkhesaurus.
84. A blind dinosaur's dog is called doyouthinkhesaurus-rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alienseseses on Jul 30, 2013, 05:55:18 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 30, 2013, 05:48:04 PM
83. A blind dinosaur is called doyouthinkhesaurus.
84. A blind dinosaur's dog is called doyouthinkhesaurus-rex.

:D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 30, 2013, 06:02:37 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 29, 2013, 04:50:21 PM
47. They left Japan to get away from this.

You Sir, win the internet.

85. Figure out what to do once you don't have to dig up dino bones anymore.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 30, 2013, 06:06:54 PM
86. If we split up, I'm going with you guys.

87. I think we're out of a job.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 30, 2013, 06:15:19 PM
88. The kid in  JP3 can elude velcioraptors, T-rex, Spinosaurous and many other dinosaurs, but he can not tell if there is his mom or a dino in front of him on a bridge.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 30, 2013, 06:20:12 PM
89. It's still a flea circus; all an illusion.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 30, 2013, 06:21:48 PM
90. Please! I hate this hacker crap!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 30, 2013, 06:26:23 PM
91. The ice cream is good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Jul 30, 2013, 07:14:26 PM
92. They should all be destroyed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jul 30, 2013, 07:22:25 PM
93. Nedry is a play on "Nerdy". :P
94. Nedry's action figure looked like Dodgson:
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.wikia.com%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2Fb%2Fb4%2FDennisNEDTOY.jpg&hash=c583f7007b91dc2e3dd0dc9d411688a847543cd1)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 30, 2013, 08:33:11 PM
95. Mr. Arnold did not say the magic word. Ah Ah Ah!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alienseseses on Jul 30, 2013, 08:34:50 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 30, 2013, 06:02:37 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 29, 2013, 04:50:21 PM
47. They left Japan to get away from this.

You Sir, win the internet.

Damn, I didn't see that when I posted this:

Quote from: Alienseseses on Jul 29, 2013, 09:56:37 PM
66. We left Japan to get away from this!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jul 30, 2013, 08:36:13 PM
96. Tyrannosaurus Rex can swim (Getting into some book stuff here NOVEL READER MASTER RACE)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: cloverfan98 on Jul 30, 2013, 08:40:34 PM
76. We've got Dodgson here.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jul 30, 2013, 08:49:37 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 30, 2013, 06:15:19 PM
88. The kid in  JP3 can elude velcioraptors, T-rex, Spinosaurous and many other dinosaurs, but he can not tell if there is his mom or a dino in front of him on a bridge.

I guess it was his mum then, because it certainly wasn't a dinosaur.

This thread brings out the worst in me. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 30, 2013, 08:51:43 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 30, 2013, 08:49:37 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 30, 2013, 06:15:19 PM
88. The kid in  JP3 can elude velcioraptors, T-rex, Spinosaurous and many other dinosaurs, but he can not tell if there is his mom or a dino in front of him on a bridge.

I guess it was his mum then, because it certainly wasn't a dinosaur.

This thread brings out the worst in me. :P
That was refering to when they were in the birdcage ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SIMULANT on Jul 31, 2013, 01:32:00 AM
97. Robotic arms don't like you touching the egg shell of a T-rex
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ghost Rider on Jul 31, 2013, 01:34:03 AM
Quote from: SIMULANT on Jul 31, 2013, 01:32:00 AM
97. Robotic arms don't like you touching the egg shell of a T-rex

Actually its a Raptor egg.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jul 31, 2013, 01:34:58 AM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 30, 2013, 08:51:43 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 30, 2013, 08:49:37 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 30, 2013, 06:15:19 PM
88. The kid in  JP3 can elude velcioraptors, T-rex, Spinosaurous and many other dinosaurs, but he can not tell if there is his mom or a dino in front of him on a bridge.

I guess it was his mum then, because it certainly wasn't a dinosaur.

This thread brings out the worst in me. :P
That was refering to when they were in the birdcage ;)

Yes and that still wasn't a Dinosaur.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SIMULANT on Jul 31, 2013, 01:39:54 AM
Quote from: Ghost Rider on Jul 31, 2013, 01:34:03 AM
Quote from: SIMULANT on Jul 31, 2013, 01:32:00 AM
97. Robotic arms don't like you touching the egg shell of a T-rex

Actually its a Raptor egg.

oops my bad :)

And that's why i'm not allowed in Jurassic Park
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ghost Rider on Jul 31, 2013, 01:41:20 AM
Quote from: SIMULANT on Jul 31, 2013, 01:39:54 AM
Quote from: Ghost Rider on Jul 31, 2013, 01:34:03 AM
Quote from: SIMULANT on Jul 31, 2013, 01:32:00 AM
97. Robotic arms don't like you touching the egg shell of a T-rex

Actually its a Raptor egg.

oops my bad :)

And that's why i'm not allowed in Jurassic Park

Was that before or after the "Dino Skirt" incident?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SIMULANT on Jul 31, 2013, 01:43:37 AM
I thinks its after I was hired to put the locks in the car doors...oh dear i knew I forgot to do something...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ghost Rider on Jul 31, 2013, 01:44:57 AM
Quote from: SIMULANT on Jul 31, 2013, 01:43:37 AM
I thinks its after I was hired to put the locks in the car doors...oh dear i knew I forgot to do something...

Oh dear.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 31, 2013, 02:26:11 AM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Jul 31, 2013, 01:34:58 AM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 30, 2013, 08:51:43 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 30, 2013, 08:49:37 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 30, 2013, 06:15:19 PM
88. The kid in  JP3 can elude velcioraptors, T-rex, Spinosaurous and many other dinosaurs, but he can not tell if there is his mom or a dino in front of him on a bridge.

I guess it was his mum then, because it certainly wasn't a dinosaur.

This thread brings out the worst in me. :P
That was refering to when they were in the birdcage ;)

Yes and that still wasn't a Dinosaur.
Ok, I see where you are going with this, DR GRANT.

98. 100 million years ago there were mosquitoes, just like today.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 31, 2013, 02:29:16 AM
99. At first it's all "oohing" and "ahing," then it turns to "running" and "screaming."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 31, 2013, 02:30:01 AM
100. Life finds a way.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 31, 2013, 02:34:03 AM
101. Either something happened to his other kids between movies, or Malcolm can't count for shit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BR1XER on Jul 31, 2013, 03:44:47 AM
102. A Spinosaurus has trouble snatching a guy hanging from a relatively short crane.

103. Don't hide in the bathroom during a T-Rex rampage.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Jul 31, 2013, 03:53:29 AM
104. Alan Grant has nightmares about talking raptors.

105. Spinosaurus can break through a heavy, spiked, and barb wired fence that's meant to keep dinosaurs in; but it can't break through a steel door.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 31, 2013, 03:58:22 AM
106. Kill a few Velociraptors, nobody panics. Kill a T. rex, and everyone loses their minds!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RoaryUK on Jul 31, 2013, 04:06:00 AM
107.  Do you think they'll have that on the tour!
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi16.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fb13%2FAndyUK_1962%2FLG0VI0Q_zps5b2d4b78.gif&hash=4b84312679a6426985d12e0cc3a38155f16a33a7) (http://s16.photobucket.com/user/AndyUK_1962/media/LG0VI0Q_zps5b2d4b78.gif.html)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 31, 2013, 11:09:18 AM
I'm surprised no one mentioned the most important one of all yet.

108. Welcome to Jurassic Park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 31, 2013, 11:11:41 AM
109. Rough...smooth. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 31, 2013, 11:18:24 AM
110. You cannot land on this island!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SIMULANT on Jul 31, 2013, 11:49:59 AM
111. Must go faster, must go faster
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 31, 2013, 12:14:51 PM
Quote from: SIMULANT on Jul 31, 2013, 11:49:59 AM
111. Must go faster, must go faster

Spoiler
0:35

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxS0kiUX6p0# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxS0kiUX6p0#)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 31, 2013, 01:25:04 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 31, 2013, 12:14:51 PM
Quote from: SIMULANT on Jul 31, 2013, 11:49:59 AM
111. Must go faster, must go faster

Spoiler
0:35

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxS0kiUX6p0# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxS0kiUX6p0#)
[close]

f**king love that part.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 31, 2013, 03:00:24 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 31, 2013, 11:09:18 AM
I'm surprised no one mentioned the most important one of all yet.

108. Welcome to Jurassic Park.
112. What do they got in there, King Kong?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 31, 2013, 03:21:42 PM
113. I saved your hat.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 31, 2013, 04:28:41 PM
114. They move in herds. They do move in herds.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SIMULANT on Jul 31, 2013, 06:49:19 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 31, 2013, 12:14:51 PM
Quote from: SIMULANT on Jul 31, 2013, 11:49:59 AM
111. Must go faster, must go faster

Spoiler
0:35

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxS0kiUX6p0# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxS0kiUX6p0#)
[close]

Was actually referring to the bit when the T-Rex chases them through the wood area when they are in the jeep. Not Independence day but weird how he says it in two separate films.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 31, 2013, 09:11:53 PM
115. The taxi drivers of Costa Rica prefer it if you close the doors.

Quote from: SIMULANT on Jul 31, 2013, 06:49:19 PM
Was actually referring to the bit when the T-Rex chases them through the wood area when they are in the jeep. Not Independence day but weird how he says it in two separate films.

That's why I posted it ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Aug 01, 2013, 11:22:58 PM
If they ever did make a complete reboot that followed the original book by Crichton very closely, these are the people that I would want to be cast, as I imagine their look in the book.  Some might be strange options, but it's exactly how I envision them to appear....

John Hammond - John Hurt
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmetrouk2.files.wordpress.com%2F2013%2F04%2Fay_107540163.jpg%3Fw%3D650%26amp%3Bh%3D430%26amp%3Bcrop%3D1&hash=2bc24d77b7eabaeb03b970c76a9352d6efe54c49)

Alan Grant - Jim Carrey
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimage3.examiner.com%2Fimages%2Fblog%2FEXID18077%2Fimages%2F58535045downtrac105200983207PM.jpg&hash=ab53f9f685c2b0378832f1ad6cf3bb4a345f0cca)

Ian Malcolm - Stanley Tucci
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsnarkerati.com%2Fmovie-news%2Ffiles%2F2012%2F03%2Fstanley_tucci.jpg&hash=7f8fccee2fbc2bfdbb16b511edbf362657eb5463)

Ellie Sattler - Rosamund Pike
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eftekasat.net%2Fpmg%2Fpix_edadasastew%2F2558%2FRosamund_Pike_-_Pride_and_Prejudice_portrait_session_006.jpg&hash=80a46647dbeb32f813755f9e9d2d8ba03054a601)

Donald Gennaro - Will Arnett
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg1.rnkr-static.com%2Fuser_node_img%2F50010%2F1000189480%2Ffull%2Fwill-arnett-in-black-polo-shirt-all-people-photo-u1.jpg&hash=a97ee686bf9ca2a5f39f7d77fc7780a3838ef52d)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 02, 2013, 12:15:15 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Aug 01, 2013, 11:22:58 PM
If they ever did make a complete reboot that followed the original book by Crichton very closely, these are the people that I would want to be cast, as I imagine their look in the book.  Some might be strange options, but it's exactly how I envision them to appear....

John Hammond - John Hurt
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmetrouk2.files.wordpress.com%2F2013%2F04%2Fay_107540163.jpg%3Fw%3D650%26amp%3Bh%3D430%26amp%3Bcrop%3D1&hash=2bc24d77b7eabaeb03b970c76a9352d6efe54c49)

Alan Grant - Jim Carrey
http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID18077/images/58535045downtrac105200983207PM.jpg

Ian Malcolm - Stanley Tucci
http://snarkerati.com/movie-news/files/2012/03/stanley_tucci.jpg

Ellie Sattler - Rosamund Pike
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eftekasat.net%2Fpmg%2Fpix_edadasastew%2F2558%2FRosamund_Pike_-_Pride_and_Prejudice_portrait_session_006.jpg&hash=80a46647dbeb32f813755f9e9d2d8ba03054a601)

Donald Gennaro - Will Arnett
http://img1.rnkr-static.com/user_node_img/50010/1000189480/full/will-arnett-in-black-polo-shirt-all-people-photo-u1.jpg

Ok, I'm not going to lie, I wanna see THAT Jurassic Park!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Aug 02, 2013, 12:15:59 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Aug 01, 2013, 11:22:58 PM
If they ever did make a complete reboot that followed the original book by Crichton very closely, these are the people that I would want to be cast, as I imagine their look in the book.  Some might be strange options, but it's exactly how I envision them to appear....

John Hammond - John Hurt
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmetrouk2.files.wordpress.com%2F2013%2F04%2Fay_107540163.jpg%3Fw%3D650%26amp%3Bh%3D430%26amp%3Bcrop%3D1&hash=2bc24d77b7eabaeb03b970c76a9352d6efe54c49)

Alan Grant - Jim Carrey
http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID18077/images/58535045downtrac105200983207PM.jpg

Ian Malcolm - Stanley Tucci
http://snarkerati.com/movie-news/files/2012/03/stanley_tucci.jpg

Ellie Sattler - Rosamund Pike
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eftekasat.net%2Fpmg%2Fpix_edadasastew%2F2558%2FRosamund_Pike_-_Pride_and_Prejudice_portrait_session_006.jpg&hash=80a46647dbeb32f813755f9e9d2d8ba03054a601)

Donald Gennaro - Will Arnett
http://img1.rnkr-static.com/user_node_img/50010/1000189480/full/will-arnett-in-black-polo-shirt-all-people-photo-u1.jpg

I could see those. But I didn't read Crichton's novel until some time after I saw the movie the first time. So the novel characters were the absolute same in my mind.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Aug 02, 2013, 01:35:58 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Aug 02, 2013, 12:15:15 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Aug 01, 2013, 11:22:58 PM
If they ever did make a complete reboot that followed the original book by Crichton very closely, these are the people that I would want to be cast, as I imagine their look in the book.  Some might be strange options, but it's exactly how I envision them to appear....

John Hammond - John Hurt
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmetrouk2.files.wordpress.com%2F2013%2F04%2Fay_107540163.jpg%3Fw%3D650%26amp%3Bh%3D430%26amp%3Bcrop%3D1&hash=2bc24d77b7eabaeb03b970c76a9352d6efe54c49)

Alan Grant - Jim Carrey
http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID18077/images/58535045downtrac105200983207PM.jpg

Ian Malcolm - Stanley Tucci
http://snarkerati.com/movie-news/files/2012/03/stanley_tucci.jpg

Ellie Sattler - Rosamund Pike
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eftekasat.net%2Fpmg%2Fpix_edadasastew%2F2558%2FRosamund_Pike_-_Pride_and_Prejudice_portrait_session_006.jpg&hash=80a46647dbeb32f813755f9e9d2d8ba03054a601)

Donald Gennaro - Will Arnett
http://img1.rnkr-static.com/user_node_img/50010/1000189480/full/will-arnett-in-black-polo-shirt-all-people-photo-u1.jpg

Ok, I'm not going to lie, I wanna see THAT Jurassic Park!
116. I second the motion! (TLW deleted scene)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BR1XER on Aug 02, 2013, 02:02:23 AM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Aug 02, 2013, 12:15:59 AM
I could see those. But I didn't read Crichton's novel until some time after I saw the movie the first time. So the novel characters were the absolute same in my mind.

Same here. Honestly, I think I liked the film better, but maybe it's just because I was 10 when I read it.  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 02, 2013, 02:12:20 AM
I too prefer the films telling of the story over the novel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on Aug 02, 2013, 05:01:14 AM
I like the first JP movie better, but infinitely prefer the second book to the second film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SIMULANT on Aug 02, 2013, 12:02:12 PM
117. Rich people and Dinosaur islands don't mix
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Aug 02, 2013, 01:08:48 PM
I'm currently going through a fantastic dinosaur phase and I've been reading "The Sound of Thunder" by Ray Bradbury to feed this obsession and fuel the fire that drives the dinosaur project I've been fleshing out.

Anyway, I thought it would be nice if when we return to Jurassic Park we get some gnarly, graceful, alien, bird like beasts. This passage from Sound of Thunder made me think of what could be the scary/creepy/grace of a Tyrannosaurus Rex.

QuoteIt came on great oiled, resilient, striding legs. It towered thirty feet above half of the trees, a great evil god, folding its delicate watchmaker's claws close to its oily reptilian chest. Each lower leg was a piston, a thousand pounds of white bone, sunk in thick ropes of muscle, sheathed over in a gleam of pebbled skin like the mail of a terrible warrior. Each thigh was a ton of meat, ivory, and steel mesh. And from the great breathing cage of the upper body those two delicate arms dangled out front, arms with hands which might pick up and examine men like toys, while the snake neck coiled. And the head itself, a ton of sculptured stone, lifted easily upon the sky. Its mouth gaped, exposing a fence of teeth like daggers. Its eyes rolled, ostrich eggs, empty of all expression save hunger. It closed its mouth in a death grin. It ran, its pelvic bones crushing aside trees and bushes, its taloned feet clawing damp earth, leaving prints six inches deep wherever it settled its weight.

It ran with a gliding ballet step, far too poised and balanced for its ten tons. It moved into a sunlit area warily, its beautifully reptilian hands feeling the air.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-SUcoknWtAxs%2FUDFQGLgxJNI%2FAAAAAAAAIzM%2FAPLuoudSSVs%2Fs400%2F17DinosaurTalesStout.jpg&hash=5d1eca3d1e1dd36668595815eab2e04fecc011c9)


Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 02, 2013, 02:44:59 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Aug 01, 2013, 11:22:58 PM
If they ever did make a complete reboot that followed the original book by Crichton very closely, these are the people that I would want to be cast, as I imagine their look in the book.  Some might be strange options, but it's exactly how I envision them to appear....

John Hammond - John Hurt
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmetrouk2.files.wordpress.com%2F2013%2F04%2Fay_107540163.jpg%3Fw%3D650%26amp%3Bh%3D430%26amp%3Bcrop%3D1&hash=2bc24d77b7eabaeb03b970c76a9352d6efe54c49)

Alan Grant - Jim Carrey
http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID18077/images/58535045downtrac105200983207PM.jpg

Ian Malcolm - Stanley Tucci
http://snarkerati.com/movie-news/files/2012/03/stanley_tucci.jpg

Ellie Sattler - Rosamund Pike
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eftekasat.net%2Fpmg%2Fpix_edadasastew%2F2558%2FRosamund_Pike_-_Pride_and_Prejudice_portrait_session_006.jpg&hash=80a46647dbeb32f813755f9e9d2d8ba03054a601)

Donald Gennaro - Will Arnett
http://img1.rnkr-static.com/user_node_img/50010/1000189480/full/will-arnett-in-black-polo-shirt-all-people-photo-u1.jpg

A fool like Jim Carrey has no business being in a Jurassic Park film. I don't respect him as an actor anymore. He was funny in the 90s but lately he's become very stale to me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Aug 02, 2013, 04:38:51 PM
Replace Jim Carrey with Jeffrey Dean Morgan and I would watch that movie.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.starpulse.com%2Fpictures%2F2009%2F03%2F03%2Fpreviews%2FJeffrey%2520Dean%2520Morgan-ALO-059981.jpg&hash=215e65cec18b93d698757eab1840b3eb91f2b7ed)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Aug 02, 2013, 04:51:47 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Aug 02, 2013, 01:08:48 PM
Spoiler
QuoteIt came on great oiled, resilient, striding legs. It towered thirty feet above half of the trees, a great evil god, folding its delicate watchmaker's claws close to its oily reptilian chest. Each lower leg was a piston, a thousand pounds of white bone, sunk in thick ropes of muscle, sheathed over in a gleam of pebbled skin like the mail of a terrible warrior. Each thigh was a ton of meat, ivory, and steel mesh. And from the great breathing cage of the upper body those two delicate arms dangled out front, arms with hands which might pick up and examine men like toys, while the snake neck coiled. And the head itself, a ton of sculptured stone, lifted easily upon the sky. Its mouth gaped, exposing a fence of teeth like daggers. Its eyes rolled, ostrich eggs, empty of all expression save hunger. It closed its mouth in a death grin. It ran, its pelvic bones crushing aside trees and bushes, its taloned feet clawing damp earth, leaving prints six inches deep wherever it settled its weight.

It ran with a gliding ballet step, far too poised and balanced for its ten tons. It moved into a sunlit area warily, its beautifully reptilian hands feeling the air.
[close]

That is one ridiculously evocative bit of literature.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Aug 02, 2013, 05:53:02 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Aug 02, 2013, 01:08:48 PM
I'm currently going through a fantastic dinosaur phase and I've been reading "The Sound of Thunder" by Ray Bradbury to feed this obsession and fuel the fire that drives the dinosaur project I've been fleshing out.

Anyway, I thought it would be nice if when we return to Jurassic Park we get some gnarly, graceful, alien, bird like beasts. This passage from Sound of Thunder made me think of what could be the scary/creepy/grace of a Tyrannosaurus Rex.

QuoteIt came on great oiled, resilient, striding legs. It towered thirty feet above half of the trees, a great evil god, folding its delicate watchmaker's claws close to its oily reptilian chest. Each lower leg was a piston, a thousand pounds of white bone, sunk in thick ropes of muscle, sheathed over in a gleam of pebbled skin like the mail of a terrible warrior. Each thigh was a ton of meat, ivory, and steel mesh. And from the great breathing cage of the upper body those two delicate arms dangled out front, arms with hands which might pick up and examine men like toys, while the snake neck coiled. And the head itself, a ton of sculptured stone, lifted easily upon the sky. Its mouth gaped, exposing a fence of teeth like daggers. Its eyes rolled, ostrich eggs, empty of all expression save hunger. It closed its mouth in a death grin. It ran, its pelvic bones crushing aside trees and bushes, its taloned feet clawing damp earth, leaving prints six inches deep wherever it settled its weight.

It ran with a gliding ballet step, far too poised and balanced for its ten tons. It moved into a sunlit area warily, its beautifully reptilian hands feeling the air.

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-SUcoknWtAxs/UDFQGLgxJNI/AAAAAAAAIzM/APLuoudSSVs/s400/17DinosaurTalesStout.jpg

That is extremely awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Aug 02, 2013, 06:07:51 PM
And then it dies, so...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Aug 02, 2013, 06:10:34 PM
Yeah. That part...ugghh...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 02, 2013, 07:03:27 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Aug 02, 2013, 04:38:51 PM
Replace Jim Carrey with Jeffrey Dean Morgan and I would watch that movie.

http://images.starpulse.com/pictures/2009/03/03/previews/Jeffrey%20Dean%20Morgan-ALO-059981.jpg

Yes. Now, we've got a star-studded cast.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: cloverfan98 on Aug 03, 2013, 03:59:08 AM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Aug 02, 2013, 01:08:48 PM
I'm currently going through a fantastic dinosaur phase and I've been reading "The Sound of Thunder" by Ray Bradbury to feed this obsession and fuel the fire that drives the dinosaur project I've been fleshing out.

Anyway, I thought it would be nice if when we return to Jurassic Park we get some gnarly, graceful, alien, bird like beasts. This passage from Sound of Thunder made me think of what could be the scary/creepy/grace of a Tyrannosaurus Rex.

QuoteIt came on great oiled, resilient, striding legs. It towered thirty feet above half of the trees, a great evil god, folding its delicate watchmaker's claws close to its oily reptilian chest. Each lower leg was a piston, a thousand pounds of white bone, sunk in thick ropes of muscle, sheathed over in a gleam of pebbled skin like the mail of a terrible warrior. Each thigh was a ton of meat, ivory, and steel mesh. And from the great breathing cage of the upper body those two delicate arms dangled out front, arms with hands which might pick up and examine men like toys, while the snake neck coiled. And the head itself, a ton of sculptured stone, lifted easily upon the sky. Its mouth gaped, exposing a fence of teeth like daggers. Its eyes rolled, ostrich eggs, empty of all expression save hunger. It closed its mouth in a death grin. It ran, its pelvic bones crushing aside trees and bushes, its taloned feet clawing damp earth, leaving prints six inches deep wherever it settled its weight.

It ran with a gliding ballet step, far too poised and balanced for its ten tons. It moved into a sunlit area warily, its beautifully reptilian hands feeling the air.

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-SUcoknWtAxs/UDFQGLgxJNI/AAAAAAAAIzM/APLuoudSSVs/s400/17DinosaurTalesStout.jpg

I wanna recommend a great little book I got from my Library called Dinosaur Tales by Ray Bradbury and it not only features that great epic A Sound of Thunder, but a few others as well including The Fog Horn which was made into The Beast From 20,000 Fathoms, and a short story about a stop motion animator. (sound like anyone we may know?) Here's the Amazon page.

http://www.amazon.com/Dinosaur-Tales-Ray-Bradbury/dp/0743458974/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1375502072&sr=1-1&keywords=ray+bradbury+dinosaur (http://www.amazon.com/Dinosaur-Tales-Ray-Bradbury/dp/0743458974/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1375502072&sr=1-1&keywords=ray+bradbury+dinosaur)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Aug 03, 2013, 09:18:34 PM
That's the book I read it from.  ;)

I haven't checked out any of the other stories within. I'm afraid of some of them. They look like they might be rather silly and campish. Going to give them a shot none the less.

On the subject of recommending (dinosaur books) ...

http://www.amazon.com/Dinosaurs-Fantastic-New-View-Lost/dp/0792453573/ref=sr_1_9?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1375564294&sr=1-9&keywords=william+stout (http://www.amazon.com/Dinosaurs-Fantastic-New-View-Lost/dp/0792453573/ref=sr_1_9?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1375564294&sr=1-9&keywords=william+stout)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.3dfx.ch%2Fgallery%2Fd%2F50510-2%2FThe%2BDinosaurs%2Bby%2BWilliam%2BStout%2B1981%2B_amp_%2BThe%2BNew%2BDinosaurs%2Bby%2BWilliam%2BStout%2B2000%2Btop.jpg&hash=37bfa410d2cdf77e9bbced9e484c3f83a5ccf52f)

I got this book for Christmas in 1981. Changed my life (at least my life concerning dinosaurs.) The one on the left is the one published in 81 and is the one I had (and have since reacquired over Amazon.) The other I believe is a more recently published edition. Don't know if there is any other goodies in there or if it's just a straight up reprint.

Anyway ... highly recommend for fans of Dinosaurs. 



Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Aug 03, 2013, 10:14:25 PM
That does look gorgeous. Any inside shots?

I've been thinking about ways to get my Vertilings interested in dinosaurs if/when they achieve existence. An accessible book with gorgeous imagery could work. For that matter, I'm always looking out for great examples of dinosaur art - seems hard to find books focusing entirely on it. I continuously rented a stunning art-based book from my library as a youngster, then one day it disappeared and I've never been able to track it down. Doesn't help that I have no idea what it was called.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Aug 03, 2013, 10:28:33 PM
A look inside ...

Spoiler

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_lhuzh4dAG51qhsdu1o1_500.jpg&hash=feb61e378373b38845bf49a0a7c5980d74e5810a)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F%5Burl%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_li42jsXvGB1qhsdu1o1_500.jpg%255Dhttp%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_li42jsXvGB1qhsdu1o1_500.jpg%255B%2Furl%255D&hash=f01654b3a266b3d4f300eaff54a091ba39d3e5a0)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F%5Burl%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fencrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com%2Fimages%3Fq%3Dtbn%3AANd9GcSIeUhYBggufSKpBOK4PCe8v0yaYCiP-Ktw_QjZl4C7k1PXd8mNVg%255Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fencrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com%2Fimages%3Fq%3Dtbn%3AANd9GcSIeUhYBggufSKpBOK4PCe8v0yaYCiP-Ktw_QjZl4C7k1PXd8mNVg%255B%2Furl%255D&hash=aacb2640ce95fc43033c0d0f7018fe37bf9b41f9)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F24.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_lp63d4zdYD1qlpawho1_500.jpg&hash=9542f03dfa9308326e01ca453293510bba976197)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Fa7e6c97d02fcc6acd83519d733466dd1%2Ftumblr_mk4lffOoLJ1r38ji3o2_1280.jpg&hash=a23752228eabb9579bf4529192a1eefc6ea2bb9b)
[close]

It is gorgeous. Very distinctive style. The artist (William Stout) even draws the boarders of his pictures (like a frame) and adorns them with all sorts of details. I started out with much simpler books on the subject. But this was a great bridge from childhood dinosaurs to seriously considering them as living breathing animals that actually existed.

Another great art book I recently purchased. Though a lot of it seems computer generated, Photoshopped, etc.

http://www.amazon.com/Dinosaur-Art-Worlds-Greatest-Paleoart/dp/0857685848/ref=sr_1_11?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1375564294&sr=1-11&keywords=william+stout (http://www.amazon.com/Dinosaur-Art-Worlds-Greatest-Paleoart/dp/0857685848/ref=sr_1_11?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1375564294&sr=1-11&keywords=william+stout)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fecx.images-amazon.com%2Fimages%2FI%2F61sR%252BBqUcTL.jpg&hash=148a486430ae1f03fba923d9c67690cadfa315ac)

That book you remembered ... any particular image that stood out and struck you?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DJ Pu$$yface on Aug 03, 2013, 10:42:32 PM
I remember that exact image on the cover from another book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Aug 03, 2013, 10:54:11 PM
Raul Martin is the author of that one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Aug 04, 2013, 05:37:15 AM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Aug 03, 2013, 10:28:33 PM
A look inside ...

Spoiler

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_lhuzh4dAG51qhsdu1o1_500.jpg&hash=feb61e378373b38845bf49a0a7c5980d74e5810a)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F%5Burl%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_li42jsXvGB1qhsdu1o1_500.jpg%255Dhttp%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_li42jsXvGB1qhsdu1o1_500.jpg%255B%2Furl%255D&hash=f01654b3a266b3d4f300eaff54a091ba39d3e5a0)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F%5Burl%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fencrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com%2Fimages%3Fq%3Dtbn%3AANd9GcSIeUhYBggufSKpBOK4PCe8v0yaYCiP-Ktw_QjZl4C7k1PXd8mNVg%255Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fencrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com%2Fimages%3Fq%3Dtbn%3AANd9GcSIeUhYBggufSKpBOK4PCe8v0yaYCiP-Ktw_QjZl4C7k1PXd8mNVg%255B%2Furl%255D&hash=aacb2640ce95fc43033c0d0f7018fe37bf9b41f9)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F24.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_lp63d4zdYD1qlpawho1_500.jpg&hash=9542f03dfa9308326e01ca453293510bba976197)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Fa7e6c97d02fcc6acd83519d733466dd1%2Ftumblr_mk4lffOoLJ1r38ji3o2_1280.jpg&hash=a23752228eabb9579bf4529192a1eefc6ea2bb9b)
[close]

It is gorgeous. Very distinctive style. The artist (William Stout) even draws the boarders of his pictures (like a frame) and adorns them with all sorts of details. I started out with much simpler books on the subject. But this was a great bridge from childhood dinosaurs to seriously considering them as living breathing animals that actually existed.

Another great art book I recently purchased. Though a lot of it seems computer generated, Photoshopped, etc.

http://www.amazon.com/Dinosaur-Art-Worlds-Greatest-Paleoart/dp/0857685848/ref=sr_1_11?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1375564294&sr=1-11&keywords=william+stout (http://www.amazon.com/Dinosaur-Art-Worlds-Greatest-Paleoart/dp/0857685848/ref=sr_1_11?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1375564294&sr=1-11&keywords=william+stout)

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/61sR%2BBqUcTL.jpg

That book you remembered ... any particular image that stood out and struck you?
I have that Paleoart book, it's pretty awesome!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Aug 04, 2013, 07:35:25 AM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Aug 03, 2013, 10:28:33 PMThat book you remembered ... any particular image that stood out and struck you?

It was filled with very realistic (or so I thought in the early '90s) oil paintings. I remember one or two green Saurolophus in a forest, and that it was one of the first illustrations I saw to portray sauropod skin texture like an elephant's (only a little more fluid); I think the sauropods were walking along a beach.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Aug 04, 2013, 04:56:55 PM
The 200 things we learned from JP/TLW/JP3 (continued!)

117. Always make road signs that don't spin or can be altered. (JP)
118. Malcolm has great taste in cars. (TLW)
119. Raptors are now Dr. Grant's main focus. (JP3)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: War Wager on Aug 04, 2013, 05:45:27 PM
120. Sarah got the jump on us
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Aug 04, 2013, 06:00:06 PM
121. Nick Van Owen thinks there are multiple Sarahs on Isla Sorna. (TLW)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Aug 04, 2013, 10:12:37 PM
122. When that...  tricicloplots attacks, don't come running to me!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Aug 04, 2013, 11:17:24 PM
Already said I think ^

Why in the f**k did the sign have an arrow that you could spin around on a wheel anyway? Were there two different docks, depending on where the ship would come in or something? Does Arnold ever say anything that could allude to that, or is that just the most hilariously out of place spinning-arrow road sign in film history? :laugh: But the audience gladly bought it thanks to the general greatness of the film.

I was like 'why... wtf that sign have a spinning arrow for? like is that a bad joke?' but then I said 'aw Nedry's gonna get eaten.'
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on Aug 04, 2013, 11:53:24 PM
Maybe there was an alternative route a park ranger could've used if the roads were washed out.








Or something.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BR1XER on Aug 05, 2013, 02:54:46 AM
Methinks they have interchangeable signs in the case they need to alter the route. It shows how cheap the park is though.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Aug 05, 2013, 03:02:37 AM
Could just be that a screw holding the arrow in place came loose when he crashed into the sign. I know we don't see the head of the screw, but it could easily be underneath the surface layer where the arrow is.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 05, 2013, 10:55:47 AM
Quote from: RagingDragon on Aug 04, 2013, 11:17:24 PM
Already said I think ^

Why in the f**k did the sign have an arrow that you could spin around on a wheel anyway? Were there two different docks, depending on where the ship would come in or something? Does Arnold ever say anything that could allude to that, or is that just the most hilariously out of place spinning-arrow road sign in film history? :laugh: But the audience gladly bought it thanks to the general greatness of the film.

I was like 'why... wtf that sign have a spinning arrow for? like is that a bad joke?' but then I said 'aw Nedry's gonna get eaten.'

I think they just needed a reason to make Humpty Dumpty even more frustrated than he already was.

True story: when I was six, I saw JP for the first time with my mum and a cousin of ours. When I asked mum why Nedry was always grunting and groaning as he raced to the docks, her reply was very candid, "Because he's an idiot."

Still gets me to this day :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SIMULANT on Aug 05, 2013, 11:40:01 AM
Quote from: RagingDragon on Aug 04, 2013, 11:17:24 PM
Already said I think ^

Why in the f**k did the sign have an arrow that you could spin around on a wheel anyway? Were there two different docks, depending on where the ship would come in or something? Does Arnold ever say anything that could allude to that, or is that just the most hilariously out of place spinning-arrow road sign in film history? :laugh: But the audience gladly bought it thanks to the general greatness of the film.

I was like 'why... wtf that sign have a spinning arrow for? like is that a bad joke?' but then I said 'aw Nedry's gonna get eaten.'

in the words of John Hammond "no expense spared"

Except the locks on car doors, fixed in place signs, Barriers on roads to stop escaping computer programmers, Dinosaur proof glass and poorly built toilets.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Aug 07, 2013, 03:54:23 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.flixist.com%2Ful%2F215703-sam-neill-jurassic-park-reboot-rumor.jpg&hash=fc6efce12b33609fa67bb713d15fc7f1788a9bef)

Also found this cool pic of Spino's foot.  Always thought it was CG, but apparently it was the animatronic foot....

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.tnt.tv%2Fv5cache%2FTNT%2FImages%2Fi1%2FjurassicPark_wp4_1024x768.jpg&hash=9f88448a7bdbd3ffd549db083d7f93760ec07fcb)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 07, 2013, 11:27:03 AM
The CG looked better than the animatronic. For whatever reason, the Spino's head just didn't look real.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Aug 07, 2013, 04:07:59 PM
It moved too mechanically.... and did it even blink? :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Aug 07, 2013, 05:25:59 PM
I agree, nowhere near the level of the rex which, despite being animatronic, still looked convincing in how it was shot.

They need more SFX documentaries that talk about how important it is for a director to properly use/shoot their effects shots. Cameron and Scott are great at this, as are a lot of others, but I think we've all seen poor FX segments that could share the blame with the director for trying to shoot it that way as opposed to the effects artists themselves.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 13, 2013, 10:28:56 PM
I chat to Colin Trevorrow (director of Jurassic Park 4) about JP...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6vnBYPfJ5o#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6vnBYPfJ5o#ws)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Aug 13, 2013, 10:32:06 PM
Awesome! :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Aug 14, 2013, 12:01:40 AM
Really fantastic of you to do that Jack!  Huge pat on the back  :)

Also!

"REALITY" used for designing vehicles on JP4

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=51#comments (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=51#comments)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 14, 2013, 03:04:42 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Aug 13, 2013, 10:28:56 PM
I chat to Colin Trevorrow (director of Jurassic Park 4) about JP...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6vnBYPfJ5o#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6vnBYPfJ5o#ws)

I'll be sure to give it a listen at work! Great work my friend.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 14, 2013, 08:44:39 AM
No muzzled T-Rex! ;)

You heard it here first.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Aug 14, 2013, 10:17:39 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Aug 13, 2013, 10:28:56 PM
I chat to Colin Trevorrow (director of Jurassic Park 4) about JP...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6vnBYPfJ5o#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6vnBYPfJ5o#ws)
Awesome, man. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 14, 2013, 12:21:37 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Aug 13, 2013, 10:28:56 PM
I chat to Colin Trevorrow (director of Jurassic Park 4) about JP...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6vnBYPfJ5o#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6vnBYPfJ5o#ws)

Cheers and thank you so very much for this A3, I loved it! Colin seems like a very genuine guy who understands the idea of being a fan but not letting that cloud his vision of the film. Now I really can't wait for this one ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Aug 14, 2013, 12:38:18 PM
I trust Colin, he knows exactly what to do with JP4.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 14, 2013, 07:55:09 PM
It's going viral. ;D

http://www.jurassicpark4-movie.com/news/1111 (http://www.jurassicpark4-movie.com/news/1111)

and thanks for all the feedback guys :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Aug 14, 2013, 08:08:40 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Aug 14, 2013, 12:01:40 AM
Really fantastic of you to do that Jack!  Huge pat on the back  :)

Also!

"REALITY" used for designing vehicles on JP4

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=51#comments (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=51#comments)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqyWvsCZraU#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqyWvsCZraU#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Aug 17, 2013, 06:52:35 PM
So is the next movie happening ?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Aug 17, 2013, 07:20:34 PM
Yes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Aug 18, 2013, 10:27:28 AM
Great interview! But my feelings towards Colin are: -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7ajdZzgR74# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7ajdZzgR74#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Aug 18, 2013, 10:44:58 AM
Quote from: Commander Keras on Aug 17, 2013, 06:52:35 PM
So is the next movie happening ?

It's been in pre-production since the start of the year.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 19, 2013, 12:35:37 PM
I'm hoping for a Dilophosaurus return. It's a dinosaur that's criminally underused in movies, if it's even used at all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Aug 19, 2013, 03:58:10 PM
Any confirmed cast yet though ?

and I also want to see Dilophosaurus again.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgifninja.com%2Fanimatedgifs%2F282079%2Fdilophosaurus.gif&hash=6f4c9e3c07fc7b040b51162ba5905588b164a03e)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Aug 20, 2013, 09:29:32 PM
I could cry.  :'(

After waiting months for the UK release, thinking I'd be booking tickets today to see it this friday I've just learnt that it's only showing in IMAX cinema's which are nowhere near where I live. I've hyped my girlfriend up about it so much too. Gutted.

Why spend the money converting it in 3D to only show it at IMAX? Surely they would want to make more money and show it in regular cinemas too.

                       (https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1-media-cdn.foolz.us%2Fffuuka%2Fboard%2Fq%2Fimage%2F1375%2F49%2F1375496692780.jpg&hash=9ede7079154617cd8ab370deae4304a188bf38e7)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Aug 20, 2013, 09:38:07 PM
If that's of any consolation we won't be getting the re-release in my country at all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Aug 20, 2013, 10:49:55 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Aug 20, 2013, 09:38:07 PM
If that's of any consolation we won't be getting the re-release in my country at all.

Where you from ?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Aug 20, 2013, 11:30:34 PM
Quote from: Taxemic on Aug 20, 2013, 09:29:32 PM
I could cry.  :'(

After waiting months for the UK release, thinking I'd be booking tickets today to see it this friday I've just learnt that it's only showing in IMAX cinema's which are nowhere near where I live. I've hyped my girlfriend up about it so much too. Gutted.

Why spend the money converting it in 3D to only show it at IMAX? Surely they would want to make more money and show it in regular cinemas too.

                       (https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1-media-cdn.foolz.us%2Fffuuka%2Fboard%2Fq%2Fimage%2F1375%2F49%2F1375496692780.jpg&hash=9ede7079154617cd8ab370deae4304a188bf38e7)

Jesus f**king flying spaghetti Christ. I'd been so bloody excited about the re-release. They screwed us with the Alien director's cut too, back in 2003/4; barely anywhere played it. What is wrong with British cinema proprietors?

I'll probably make the trip to London for the IMAX performance if they can keep it playing longer than a couple of weeks.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 21, 2013, 09:24:25 AM
So I can officially announce for the next episode of @Jurassiccast we're talking to...

...Harvey Jason AKA Ajay Sidhu!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi40.tinypic.com%2F2el6zrp.jpg&hash=9e3588bfc01e82ad62b2564f9d0cda7bc2c51c7c)

He's a very nice guy and had a lot of interesting TLW:JP set stories!
I think this will also be his first JP related interview.

Spoiler
And this won't be the last interview we're targeting more.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 21, 2013, 11:25:17 AM
Do me a favour please, and ask him why he still ran into the long grass despite yelling not to, to the others :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Aug 21, 2013, 12:10:34 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Aug 20, 2013, 11:30:34 PM
Quote from: Taxemic on Aug 20, 2013, 09:29:32 PM
I could cry.  :'(

After waiting months for the UK release, thinking I'd be booking tickets today to see it this friday I've just learnt that it's only showing in IMAX cinema's which are nowhere near where I live. I've hyped my girlfriend up about it so much too. Gutted.

Why spend the money converting it in 3D to only show it at IMAX? Surely they would want to make more money and show it in regular cinemas too.

                       (https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1-media-cdn.foolz.us%2Fffuuka%2Fboard%2Fq%2Fimage%2F1375%2F49%2F1375496692780.jpg&hash=9ede7079154617cd8ab370deae4304a188bf38e7)

Jesus f**king flying spaghetti Christ. I'd been so bloody excited about the re-release. They screwed us with the Alien director's cut too, back in 2003/4; barely anywhere played it. What is wrong with British cinema proprietors?

I'll probably make the trip to London for the IMAX performance if they can keep it playing longer than a couple of weeks.

I know. I'd also like to know who makes that decision to only show it in IMAX. I know alot of people that are pissed off about this now. How far will you have to travel to see it?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Aug 21, 2013, 12:15:08 PM
Hope to see more terradactal in this film
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Aug 21, 2013, 12:28:02 PM
Quote from: Commander Keras on Aug 21, 2013, 12:15:08 PM
Hope to see more terradactal in this film

Ah the Terradactal, the most graceful of Dinosaurs. So steeped in legend is it that even it's name strikes fear in the heart of creatures such as Terradone and Taperjerah. Even the mighty Teeranohsaw could not match it in majesty and might, and the Hadosoors knelt before it, unable to best it in the art of parenthood and other family skills.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 21, 2013, 12:53:40 PM
That's "pterosaur".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 21, 2013, 12:59:49 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Aug 21, 2013, 11:25:17 AM
Do me a favour please, and ask him why he still ran into the long grass despite yelling not to, to the others :P

Sorry man we've already recorded but it was mentioned that its like he's abandoning all hope and takes a gamble with the hunters. At least he throws the bag for Malcolm to find, if he didn't Nick wouldn't have gotten the codes for the radio.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages4.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20110307031440%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2F7%2F7f%2FAjaysidhu.jpg&hash=e916c9046e0159ad75f8b5655ffd667ec6c71ab4)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Aug 21, 2013, 02:15:23 PM
Quote from: Taxemic on Aug 21, 2013, 12:10:34 PMI know. I'd also like to know who makes that decision to only show it in IMAX. I know alot of people that are pissed off about this now. How far will you have to travel to see it?

About two hours to get to the middle of London; I live out in Wiltshire, near Swindon and Chippenham.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Aug 23, 2013, 02:21:27 PM
http://movies.yahoo.com/photos/billion-dollar-movie-club-slideshow/ (http://movies.yahoo.com/photos/billion-dollar-movie-club-slideshow/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Aug 23, 2013, 04:25:33 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Aug 21, 2013, 11:25:17 AM
Do me a favour please, and ask him why he still ran into the long grass despite yelling not to, to the others :P

Haha. I guess he could at least explain his motivation as an actor as to why his character would do such a silly thing. Or at least he might be able to recall how Spielberg explained it.

I always chalked it up to him being a follower. He'd rather follow the rest than take a chance being on his own.

We never exactly saw his fate ... so he might still be running around on the island covered in Tyrannosaur pee.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Aug 23, 2013, 06:45:06 PM
Tembo says he didn't make it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Aug 23, 2013, 07:40:15 PM
Any ideas about the plot for the new movie yet ?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Aug 23, 2013, 07:40:42 PM
Quote from: Commander Keras on Aug 23, 2013, 07:40:15 PM
Any ideas about the plot for the new movie yet ?
Dinosaurs. Guns. More Dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Aug 23, 2013, 07:42:07 PM
Dinosaurs with guns.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Aug 23, 2013, 07:51:23 PM
Yeah it's not actually Jurassic Park anymore.


It's Dino-Riders.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Aug 23, 2013, 08:01:15 PM
Dinos with lasers attached to their heads!!! :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Aug 23, 2013, 08:04:49 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Aug 23, 2013, 06:45:06 PM
Tembo says he didn't make it.

Yes I do remember that now. But hey, what does he know, right? They said Malcolm didn't make it at the end of the first book. Then he was the only returning protagonist in the second book!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Aug 23, 2013, 09:14:31 PM
Looks like Jurassic Park 4 has no room now for July. I guess they can try to fit somewhere in June 2015 now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BR1XER on Aug 23, 2013, 09:19:06 PM
Quote from: Commander Keras on Aug 23, 2013, 08:01:15 PM
Dinos with lasers attached to their heads!!! :D
^this^

It was everyhere back then when I was raving for a fourth movie. I was absolutely horrified.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Aug 25, 2013, 10:48:13 AM
What are these called ?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs22.postimg.org%2Fyepuov6m9%2Fwhat.png&hash=7e1e57b2b959f4fcfc8120e22b79e7488ef09a6b)


(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs15.postimg.org%2Frfw5iitzv%2Fwhat_2.png&hash=83138441049cdbf6a1975a0dea7ace921ce8e770)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Aug 25, 2013, 10:54:43 AM
Compsognathus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 25, 2013, 02:16:17 PM
Updated collection, which means it's time to share 8)

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/1237129_10100523673946731_1523612529_n.jpg)

Complete set of TLW small dinos

http://instagram.com/p/daKDgKFEun/ (http://instagram.com/p/daKDgKFEun/)

Complete set of JP Series small dinos

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/971933_10100509812071041_641224413_n.jpg)

In case you're wondering, the above is a repaint of the Bull Rex and accompanying man cage from 1997 Lost World line dubbed Omega T.Rex for the 1998 Chaos Effect line.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TheMonolith on Aug 25, 2013, 04:16:42 PM
I had every one of them. Say what you will about the movie, the toy line was pretty sweet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Aug 25, 2013, 04:45:21 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Aug 25, 2013, 02:16:17 PM

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/971933_10100509812071041_641224413_n.jpg)

In case you're wondering, the above is a repaint of the Bull Rex and accompanying man cage from 1997 Lost World line dubbed Omega T.Rex for the 1998 Chaos Effect line.

That's about the most 80s T. rex ever.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Aug 25, 2013, 04:58:51 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Aug 25, 2013, 04:45:21 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Aug 25, 2013, 02:16:17 PM

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/971933_10100509812071041_641224413_n.jpg)

In case you're wondering, the above is a repaint of the Bull Rex and accompanying man cage from 1997 Lost World line dubbed Omega T.Rex for the 1998 Chaos Effect line.

That's about the most 80s T. rex ever.

Don't count on that:
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wep.com%2Fgallery%2FDenver%2Ffull%2F20.jpg&hash=63d8dfa829ab4e329c0a0f351859aa9e31739942)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 25, 2013, 05:46:10 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FG56O941qTY (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FG56O941qTY#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Aug 26, 2013, 11:50:53 AM
Suprised there's been no mention of Jurassic Park 3D now it's finally been released in the UK. I'm off to see it today. Hope it's worth the travel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TheMonolith on Aug 26, 2013, 12:50:33 PM
I have heard pretty good things about it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Aug 26, 2013, 01:27:20 PM
Best use of 3D I've seen in the theater, honestly. And I usually hate 3D.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Aug 26, 2013, 01:32:04 PM
Off to see 3D today at Cineworld carnt wait.

http://www.cineworld.co.uk/whatson/6259 (http://www.cineworld.co.uk/whatson/6259)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Aug 26, 2013, 01:33:48 PM
Honestly, for me the 3D completely secondary to finally seeing the movie on the big screen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Aug 26, 2013, 01:37:08 PM
Motherf**k why has it been pulled from here even before being put in. :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Aug 26, 2013, 09:11:41 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Aug 26, 2013, 01:37:08 PM
Motherf**k why has it been pulled from here even before being put in. :'(

Sorry Omega. Must be a right kick in the balls. I genuinley feel bad for you.

Film was amazing, so was the 3D. Will write more tomorrow when I'm more awake.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Aug 27, 2013, 05:47:39 PM
Found this awesome channel on YouTube shows Puppits and Animatronic Dinos from JP thought you might like it..

http://www.youtube.com/user/StanWinstonSchool?feature=watch (http://www.youtube.com/user/StanWinstonSchool?feature=watch)

Raptor..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2xy6jl52WM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2xy6jl52WM#ws)

Compsognathus

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hyfy8rrfOkM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hyfy8rrfOkM#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomorphine on Aug 27, 2013, 07:16:50 PM
Quote from: Taxemic on Aug 26, 2013, 11:50:53 AM
Suprised there's been no mention of Jurassic Park 3D now it's finally been released in the UK.

Not where I live, it hasn't.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Aug 27, 2013, 10:36:23 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Aug 26, 2013, 01:27:20 PM
Best use of 3D I've seen in the theater, honestly. And I usually hate 3D.

Yes indeed. The only one part where it shouldn't have been done so much is in the Muldoon scene, though. It broke the immersion for me. But everywhere else, it was very nicely done.  And it's a movie from the 90's!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Aug 31, 2013, 11:48:40 AM
Legendary Pictures may be teaming up with Universal for this film: http://screenrant.com/dracula-2014-legendary-pictures-universal-jurassic-park-4/ (http://screenrant.com/dracula-2014-legendary-pictures-universal-jurassic-park-4/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Aug 31, 2013, 11:53:28 AM
That would be quite the legendary collaboration on a universal scale.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park IV
Post by: Dovahkiin on Aug 31, 2013, 02:30:28 PM
Quote from: Dachande on Apr 23, 2007, 01:32:50 PM
Scientists also said that Dinosaurs were descendats of lizerds, they were wrong, your just going by theories.

Actually no. A lot of things he said are absolutely true. T.Rex did in fact have bone crushing jaws. 6,500 pounds per square inch if I remember correctly, and that was just for your average Tyrannosaurus. It was more powerful as well, able to take down big game such as Triceratops and Edmontosaurus whereas Spinosaurus was most likely a fisher and a scavenger. Sure, Spinosaurus may win the fight one time out of ten, but Tyrannosaurus was by far the superior predator with outstanding binocular vision and a sense of smell tht could trump anything today. Even the Grizzly Bear, which can smell an opened jar of peanut butter from two miles away.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Sabby on Sep 01, 2013, 07:08:59 AM
I have a confession to make.

I liked Jurassic Park 3.

It's not my fault D= I just really like the idea of encountering a non human species that is approaching primate level intelligence.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BR1XER on Sep 01, 2013, 04:41:41 PM
I remember seeing glimpses of JP:TLW and JP3 at a younger age, but never the first JP.

Then I said, "screw it", and bought the trilogy.

JP3 is a tad silly, but I don't understand the hate for TLW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Sep 02, 2013, 04:10:37 AM
Quote from: jedi9061 on Sep 01, 2013, 04:41:41 PM
I remember seeing glimpses of JP:TLW and JP3 at a younger age, but never the first JP.

Then I said, "screw it", and bought the trilogy.

JP3 is a tad silly, but I don't understand the hate for TLW.

My exact feelings.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 02, 2013, 09:44:21 AM
Speaking of The Lost World you can now download the new episode of Jurassic Cast (the JP podcast) where we interview and chat to Harvey Jason who played Ajay in TLW!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcontent8.flixster.com%2Fphoto%2F12%2F16%2F90%2F12169042_gal.jpg&hash=59428fc48f954febf7619f784a7ca4562c78b4e6)

You can download it from iTunes or Stitcher by searching Jurassic Cast or just click here...

http://themoviedudes.jellycast.com/node/57 (http://themoviedudes.jellycast.com/node/57)

"Don't go into the long grass!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 02, 2013, 11:08:27 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Aug 31, 2013, 11:48:40 AM
Legendary Pictures may be teaming up with Universal for this film: http://screenrant.com/dracula-2014-legendary-pictures-universal-jurassic-park-4/ (http://screenrant.com/dracula-2014-legendary-pictures-universal-jurassic-park-4/)

Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Aug 31, 2013, 11:53:28 AM
That would be quite the legendary collaboration on a universal scale.

What he said. Legendary hasn't made a movie that's sucked yet so I say go for it.

Quote from: Dovahkiin on Aug 31, 2013, 02:30:28 PM
Quote from: Dachande on Apr 23, 2007, 01:32:50 PM
Scientists also said that Dinosaurs were descendats of lizerds, they were wrong, your just going by theories.

Actually no. A lot of things he said are absolutely true. T.Rex did in fact have bone crushing jaws. 6,500 pounds per square inch if I remember correctly, and that was just for your average Tyrannosaurus. It was more powerful as well, able to take down big game such as Triceratops and Edmontosaurus whereas Spinosaurus was most likely a fisher and a scavenger. Sure, Spinosaurus may win the fight one time out of ten, but Tyrannosaurus was by far the superior predator with outstanding binocular vision and a sense of smell tht could trump anything today. Even the Grizzly Bear, which can smell an opened jar of peanut butter from two miles away.

Not quite anything. In a T.Rex vs. Ankylosaurus bout, my money is on the latter.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Sep 02, 2013, 04:47:33 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 02, 2013, 11:08:27 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Aug 31, 2013, 11:48:40 AM
Legendary Pictures may be teaming up with Universal for this film: http://screenrant.com/dracula-2014-legendary-pictures-universal-jurassic-park-4/ (http://screenrant.com/dracula-2014-legendary-pictures-universal-jurassic-park-4/)

Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Aug 31, 2013, 11:53:28 AM
That would be quite the legendary collaboration on a universal scale.

What he said. Legendary hasn't made a movie that's sucked yet so I say go for it.

Quote from: Dovahkiin on Aug 31, 2013, 02:30:28 PM
Quote from: Dachande on Apr 23, 2007, 01:32:50 PM
Scientists also said that Dinosaurs were descendats of lizerds, they were wrong, your just going by theories.

Actually no. A lot of things he said are absolutely true. T.Rex did in fact have bone crushing jaws. 6,500 pounds per square inch if I remember correctly, and that was just for your average Tyrannosaurus. It was more powerful as well, able to take down big game such as Triceratops and Edmontosaurus whereas Spinosaurus was most likely a fisher and a scavenger. Sure, Spinosaurus may win the fight one time out of ten, but Tyrannosaurus was by far the superior predator with outstanding binocular vision and a sense of smell tht could trump anything today. Even the Grizzly Bear, which can smell an opened jar of peanut butter from two miles away.

Not quite anything. In a T.Rex vs. Ankylosaurus bout, my money is on the latter.

No no I meant it's senses could trump anything else's senses.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Sep 02, 2013, 09:43:06 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 02, 2013, 09:44:21 AM
Speaking of The Lost World you can now download the new episode of Jurassic Cast (the JP podcast) where we interview and chat to Harvey Jason who played Ajay in TLW!

http://content8.flixster.com/photo/12/16/90/12169042_gal.jpg

You can download it from iTunes or Stitcher by searching Jurassic Cast or just click here...

http://themoviedudes.jellycast.com/node/57 (http://themoviedudes.jellycast.com/node/57)

"Don't go into the long grass!"

Great interview Jack!  He sounds like a really nice guy.  I think it would be awesome if you got Sam Niell and/or Jeff Goldblum to do a pod cast and see what they'd have to say (or possibly even reveal) anything about JP4  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 03, 2013, 11:47:20 AM
Jack, any chance you could get whoever is acting as the paleontology advisor for the film on a podcast? I'd really love to hear about the approach the studio is taking with the dinosaur designs and I recall that Colin was pretty hush-hush about that in your chat with him.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Sep 03, 2013, 01:32:39 PM
Anyone prefer the Dinos to be...

1.CGI?

2.Animatronic?

3.Suits?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 03, 2013, 01:41:07 PM
A combination of the two, like the other films.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Sep 03, 2013, 03:34:04 PM
Can anyone tell me what are the best Jurassic Park figures & toys ?

and also wheres the best places too get them, Ebay , Amazon maybe ?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 03, 2013, 04:03:38 PM
The only JP toys ever made were produced by Kenner until 2001 when it became Hasbro. eBay is your best bet. You can indeed find them on Amazon but the prices are way higher than they ought to be. This is an ideal source for all JP toys as it's exhaustive and provides a good forum for the buying and selling of said toys. (http://jptoys.com/) If you're honestly considering getting into JP toy collection, be prepared to spend very high amounts of money on them. Take it from me as I'm an avid collector.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Sep 03, 2013, 04:26:52 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 03, 2013, 04:03:38 PM
The only JP toys ever made were produced by Kenner until 2001 when it became Hasbro. eBay is your best bet. You can indeed find them on Amazon but the prices are way higher than they ought to be. This is an ideal source for all JP toys as it's exhaustive and provides a good forum for the buying and selling of said toys. (http://jptoys.com/) If you're honestly considering getting into JP toy collection, be prepared to spend very high amounts of money on them. Take it from me as I'm an avid collector.

Thank you that site is very useful.

Do you Know where I can get my hands on a model of a Compsognathus ?




http://www.amazon.co.uk/Animal-Planet-Prehistoric-Valley-Playset/dp/B008DWRT88/ref=sr_1_11?s=kids&ie=UTF8&qid=1378226107&sr=1-11&keywords=Dilophosaurus (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Animal-Planet-Prehistoric-Valley-Playset/dp/B008DWRT88/ref=sr_1_11?s=kids&ie=UTF8&qid=1378226107&sr=1-11&keywords=Dilophosaurus)

This from Animal Planet.

Did they nick the idea of Dilophosaurus (neck frill) from Jurassic Park ?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 03, 2013, 04:42:28 PM
I have always wanted a Barbasol cryocan:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Jurassic-Park-Cryocan-Screen-Accurate-Cryo-Can-Prop-Replica-REAL-BARBASOL-NDA-/271190894440?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item3f243ca768&nma=true&si=ISbuP5yqv4DKnOudnXmzwJkwOBE%253D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557 (http://www.ebay.com/itm/Jurassic-Park-Cryocan-Screen-Accurate-Cryo-Can-Prop-Replica-REAL-BARBASOL-NDA-/271190894440?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item3f243ca768&nma=true&si=ISbuP5yqv4DKnOudnXmzwJkwOBE%253D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557)

Maybe when I get that winning Lottery jackpot ticket :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 03, 2013, 04:44:15 PM
Quote from: Commander Keras on Sep 03, 2013, 04:26:52 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 03, 2013, 04:03:38 PM
The only JP toys ever made were produced by Kenner until 2001 when it became Hasbro. eBay is your best bet. You can indeed find them on Amazon but the prices are way higher than they ought to be. This is an ideal source for all JP toys as it's exhaustive and provides a good forum for the buying and selling of said toys. (http://jptoys.com/) If you're honestly considering getting into JP toy collection, be prepared to spend very high amounts of money on them. Take it from me as I'm an avid collector.

Thank you that site is very useful.

Do you Know where I can get my hands on a model of a Compsognathus ?




http://www.amazon.co.uk/Animal-Planet-Prehistoric-Valley-Playset/dp/B008DWRT88/ref=sr_1_11?s=kids&ie=UTF8&qid=1378226107&sr=1-11&keywords=Dilophosaurus (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Animal-Planet-Prehistoric-Valley-Playset/dp/B008DWRT88/ref=sr_1_11?s=kids&ie=UTF8&qid=1378226107&sr=1-11&keywords=Dilophosaurus)

This from Animal Planet.

Did they nick the idea of Dilophosaurus (neck frill) from Jurassic Park ?

Yes they did. As awesome as Jurassic Park is, it's very pervasive in the way it has influenced the way people see dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Sep 03, 2013, 04:59:59 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 03, 2013, 04:42:28 PM
I have always wanted a Barbasol cryocan:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Jurassic-Park-Cryocan-Screen-Accurate-Cryo-Can-Prop-Replica-REAL-BARBASOL-NDA-/271190894440?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item3f243ca768&nma=true&si=ISbuP5yqv4DKnOudnXmzwJkwOBE%253D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557 (http://www.ebay.com/itm/Jurassic-Park-Cryocan-Screen-Accurate-Cryo-Can-Prop-Replica-REAL-BARBASOL-NDA-/271190894440?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item3f243ca768&nma=true&si=ISbuP5yqv4DKnOudnXmzwJkwOBE%253D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557)

Maybe when I get that winning Lottery jackpot ticket :P

Haha! thats awesome man, the actual prop as well apprently.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 04, 2013, 08:55:11 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 03, 2013, 11:47:20 AM
Jack, any chance you could get whoever is acting as the paleontology advisor for the film on a podcast? I'd really love to hear about the approach the studio is taking with the dinosaur designs and I recall that Colin was pretty hush-hush about that in your chat with him.

That would be Jack Horner right?

We're working our way up the cast list until we get the big guns ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 05, 2013, 11:42:08 AM
Awesome, I hope you get there :)

And a new arrival, folks! This here toy be a monstrosity but a beautiful monstrosity. http://instagram.com/p/d2h_LeFEp0/ (http://instagram.com/p/d2h_LeFEp0/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Sep 05, 2013, 01:38:48 PM
That gun on top would have come in handy when the rexes showed up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Sep 05, 2013, 06:15:47 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 05, 2013, 11:42:08 AM
Awesome, I hope you get there :)

And a new arrival, folks! This here toy be a monstrosity but a beautiful monstrosity. http://instagram.com/p/d2h_LeFEp0/ (http://instagram.com/p/d2h_LeFEp0/)

Thats f**king awesome man lol can you still buy this ?

Anyone seen this ?

Its old but what the heck...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2182751/Is-Australian-billionaire-launch-real-life-Jurassic-Park.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2182751/Is-Australian-billionaire-launch-real-life-Jurassic-Park.html)

Duno if its bad journolism or what ?!

really good video of how Winston school did the Dilophosaurus

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3IJQjhdLbbo#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3IJQjhdLbbo#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Sep 05, 2013, 09:10:38 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 05, 2013, 11:42:08 AM
Awesome, I hope you get there :)

And a new arrival, folks! This here toy be a monstrosity but a beautiful monstrosity. http://instagram.com/p/d2h_LeFEp0/ (http://instagram.com/p/d2h_LeFEp0/)

Chaos Effect Mobile Command Center, Yea!!!!!!!

Do you have the regular edition as well?  I REALLY want some car model company to make a screen accurate model of that baby.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 05, 2013, 09:19:35 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 05, 2013, 11:42:08 AM
Awesome, I hope you get there :)

And a new arrival, folks! This here toy be a monstrosity but a beautiful monstrosity. http://instagram.com/p/d2h_LeFEp0/ (http://instagram.com/p/d2h_LeFEp0/)
Some of the Chaos Effect line of action figures/dinos/sets are outrageous in price, esp. if they are still in the MISB (mint in sealed box) state... Neat nonetheless!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Sep 06, 2013, 08:46:48 AM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 05, 2013, 09:19:35 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 05, 2013, 11:42:08 AM
Awesome, I hope you get there :)

And a new arrival, folks! This here toy be a monstrosity but a beautiful monstrosity. http://instagram.com/p/d2h_LeFEp0/ (http://instagram.com/p/d2h_LeFEp0/)
Some of the Chaos Effect line of action figures/dinos/sets are outrageous in price, esp. if they are still in the MISB (mint in sealed box) state... Neat nonetheless!
So how much would that be then ?

]http://instagram.com/p/d2h_LeFEp0/

Anyone seen this ?

Its old but what the heck...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2182751/Is-Australian-billionaire-launch-real-life-Jurassic-Park.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2182751/Is-Australian-billionaire-launch-real-life-Jurassic-Park.html)

Duno if its bad journolism or what ?!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 06, 2013, 10:58:46 AM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 05, 2013, 09:19:35 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 05, 2013, 11:42:08 AM
Awesome, I hope you get there :)

And a new arrival, folks! This here toy be a monstrosity but a beautiful monstrosity. http://instagram.com/p/d2h_LeFEp0/ (http://instagram.com/p/d2h_LeFEp0/)
Some of the Chaos Effect line of action figures/dinos/sets are outrageous in price, esp. if they are still in the MISB (mint in sealed box) state... Neat nonetheless!

It depends on the toy. A MIB Thrasher Rex, Omega Rex, or Command Centre will always fetch high prices because of their rarity. Those three at minimum always sell for $500. Loose ones ones are considerably cheaper, obviously. The one I just received cost less than $200 USD. The smaller dinos aren't usually that pricey. The most I've seen is roughly $50 USD total for the Alpha Raptor which is a repaint of the Series 1 small Velociraptor. In a case like that, it's important to weigh the importance of completing a set vs. paying a high price for a repaint.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Sep 06, 2013, 01:05:27 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 06, 2013, 10:58:46 AM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 05, 2013, 09:19:35 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 05, 2013, 11:42:08 AM
Awesome, I hope you get there :)

And a new arrival, folks! This here toy be a monstrosity but a beautiful monstrosity. http://instagram.com/p/d2h_LeFEp0/ (http://instagram.com/p/d2h_LeFEp0/)
Some of the Chaos Effect line of action figures/dinos/sets are outrageous in price, esp. if they are still in the MISB (mint in sealed box) state... Neat nonetheless!

It depends on the toy. A MIB Thrasher Rex, Omega Rex, or Command Centre will always fetch high prices because of their rarity. Those three at minimum always sell for $500. Loose ones ones are considerably cheaper, obviously. The one I just received cost less than $200 USD. The smaller dinos aren't usually that pricey. The most I've seen is roughly $50 USD total for the Alpha Raptor which is a repaint of the Series 1 small Velociraptor. In a case like that, it's important to weigh the importance of completing a set vs. paying a high price for a repaint.
[/quote

Those prices are VERY steep!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 06, 2013, 02:05:08 PM
Yup, which is why I said if you're going to get into it, be prepared to spend butt loads of $$.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Sep 06, 2013, 02:16:48 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 06, 2013, 02:05:08 PM
Yup, which is why I said if you're going to get into it, be prepared to spend butt loads of $$.

In my case £££ lol, but yeah deffinatly looking into it.

You know where I can get my hands on a Dilophosaurus?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 06, 2013, 03:12:43 PM
Which one?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Sep 06, 2013, 03:31:51 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 06, 2013, 03:12:43 PM
Which one?

Any really.

I think there's one called "the spitter" and it spits the venom out of it's mouth.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 06, 2013, 03:42:06 PM
Again, eBay; that's your best bet. But it also depends on which one you want. Are you going for loose or mint in box (MIB)?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Sep 06, 2013, 04:14:35 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 06, 2013, 03:42:06 PM
Again, eBay; that's your best bet. But it also depends on which one you want. Are you going for loose or mint in box (MIB)?

MIB.

I Ilke to keep my figures and toys in the boxes :)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 06, 2013, 06:32:43 PM
Then there are three to choose from.

http://www.jptoys.com/toy-database/jurassic-park/jurassic-park-series-1/dinosaurs/dilophosaurus/index.htm (http://www.jptoys.com/toy-database/jurassic-park/jurassic-park-series-1/dinosaurs/dilophosaurus/index.htm)
http://www.jptoys.com/toy-database/jurassic-park/jurassic-park-series-2/dinosaurs/dilophosaurus/index.htm (http://www.jptoys.com/toy-database/jurassic-park/jurassic-park-series-2/dinosaurs/dilophosaurus/index.htm)
http://www.jptoys.com/toy-database/lost-world/lost-world-series-1/dinosaurs/dilophosaurus/index.htm (http://www.jptoys.com/toy-database/lost-world/lost-world-series-1/dinosaurs/dilophosaurus/index.htm)

You're best off going for the Series 1 Dilo. Series II is too expensive when you consider you're buying the exact same figure and the TLW figure is very hard to find and when you do find it, it always costs a good bundle.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Sep 06, 2013, 06:50:51 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 06, 2013, 06:32:43 PM
Then there are three to choose from.

http://www.jptoys.com/toy-database/jurassic-park/jurassic-park-series-1/dinosaurs/dilophosaurus/index.htm (http://www.jptoys.com/toy-database/jurassic-park/jurassic-park-series-1/dinosaurs/dilophosaurus/index.htm)
http://www.jptoys.com/toy-database/jurassic-park/jurassic-park-series-2/dinosaurs/dilophosaurus/index.htm (http://www.jptoys.com/toy-database/jurassic-park/jurassic-park-series-2/dinosaurs/dilophosaurus/index.htm)
http://www.jptoys.com/toy-database/lost-world/lost-world-series-1/dinosaurs/dilophosaurus/index.htm (http://www.jptoys.com/toy-database/lost-world/lost-world-series-1/dinosaurs/dilophosaurus/index.htm)

You're best off going for the Series 1 Dilo. Series II is too expensive when you consider you're buying the exact same figure and the TLW figure is very hard to find and when you do find it, it always costs a good bundle.

Thanks a lot for these , exactly what I was looking for.

http://www.jptoys.com/toy-database/jurassic-park/jurassic-park-series-1/dinosaurs/dilophosaurus/index.htm (http://www.jptoys.com/toy-database/jurassic-park/jurassic-park-series-1/dinosaurs/dilophosaurus/index.htm)

This is the one I want just wish that it would come with the frill aswell.

But thats awesome thanks a lot again :)



http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/exclusive-spoilers-awesome-details-on-the-story-and-concept-for-jurassic-park-iv (http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/exclusive-spoilers-awesome-details-on-the-story-and-concept-for-jurassic-park-iv)

Anyone seen this ?!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Sep 07, 2013, 02:13:09 PM
Finally!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F24.media.tumblr.com%2Fba7116d910e8986fdf4ddce5c0278327%2Ftumblr_msq92jDgc21qz56kko1_500.png&hash=602ea0616dd22e936c9fd5713a08e576930ce99c)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Sep 07, 2013, 02:34:14 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Sep 07, 2013, 02:13:09 PM
Finally!

http://24.media.tumblr.com/ba7116d910e8986fdf4ddce5c0278327/tumblr_msq92jDgc21qz56kko1_500.png

How you get that ?

higher resolution here

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Fba7116d910e8986fdf4ddce5c0278327%2Ftumblr_msq92jDgc21qz56kko1_1280.png&hash=28a0f918434be086166960342a3294f15710f436)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Sep 07, 2013, 02:36:58 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Sep 07, 2013, 02:13:09 PM
Finally!

http://24.media.tumblr.com/ba7116d910e8986fdf4ddce5c0278327/tumblr_msq92jDgc21qz56kko1_500.png

:D :D :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Sep 07, 2013, 03:58:18 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Sep 07, 2013, 02:13:09 PM
Finally!

http://24.media.tumblr.com/ba7116d910e8986fdf4ddce5c0278327/tumblr_msq92jDgc21qz56kko1_500.png

Brilliant! :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Sep 07, 2013, 04:28:22 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLceoQGfK-c#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLceoQGfK-c#ws)

Stop motion Raptors!

I like the Komodo Dragon tongue :P

Also.. stop motion T-REX! :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=skSXW8D9ib8#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=skSXW8D9ib8#ws)

and in the actual film for comparison's sakes:
Spoiler
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEbm-xLjEwk
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Sep 07, 2013, 09:53:12 PM
I just managed to finish a script ! I can now travel on rails in any vehicle!

Just perfect for the Jurassic Park jeep scene.

Check it out :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-BTqlg_pd4# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-BTqlg_pd4#)

Also check out my poster lol : (https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs17.postimg.org%2Fgv8o48r7z%2F1z8r6f2h.jpg&hash=61af64b415b82b5120e081093b2891a0f645420f)


Note: This is just all demo stuff so none of this is final.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Sep 08, 2013, 01:08:48 AM
So is this legit?
(https://sphotos-b-mia.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/1235475_574741295894875_1233916678_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Sep 08, 2013, 01:10:10 AM
Kinda doubt it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Sep 08, 2013, 01:10:23 AM
I doubt it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Sep 08, 2013, 08:21:39 AM
Quote from: Godzillakuj94 on Sep 08, 2013, 01:08:48 AM
So is this legit?
(https://sphotos-b-mia.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/1235475_574741295894875_1233916678_n.jpg)

That's one of the funniest things I've seen in awhile. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Sep 08, 2013, 08:50:59 AM
Quote from: Godzillakuj94 on Sep 08, 2013, 01:08:48 AM
So is this legit?
(https://sphotos-b-mia.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/1235475_574741295894875_1233916678_n.jpg)
AHAHAAHHAHA  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Sep 08, 2013, 08:59:07 AM
So is John Hammond's real last name Lebowski or something?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Sep 08, 2013, 09:01:02 AM
Nah, it's Caruso.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Sep 08, 2013, 09:03:55 AM
Seriously though, we need a crossover.

'Those things, those like, dinosaurs, are just crazy stuff, man.'
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Sep 08, 2013, 09:08:41 AM
"Sir, found some remains behind the visitor centre, half-eaten."

"Well, looks like he's...

(•_•)
( •_•)>⌐■-■
(⌐■_■)

...gone extinct."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Sep 08, 2013, 09:10:10 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Sep 08, 2013, 09:08:41 AM
"Sir, found some remains behind the visitor centre, half-eaten."

"Well, looks like he's...

(•_•)
( •_•)>⌐■-■
(⌐■_■)

...gone extinct."

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffpscinema.files.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F02%2Frex.jpg&hash=41d8ce99a9fc1f45e277df3711bdf2bcb18dca87)

YEEEAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Sep 08, 2013, 09:14:41 AM
 :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Sep 08, 2013, 02:17:57 PM
Im going to buy this for my car how cool haha :D

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Jurassic-Park-Jeep-Wrangler-Sahara-Explorer-Rearview-Mirror-Hang-Tag-Prop-JP-/300940334834?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&var=&hash=item46117116f2 (http://www.ebay.com/itm/Jurassic-Park-Jeep-Wrangler-Sahara-Explorer-Rearview-Mirror-Hang-Tag-Prop-JP-/300940334834?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&var=&hash=item46117116f2)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Sep 08, 2013, 02:49:37 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Sep 08, 2013, 09:08:41 AM
"Sir, found some remains behind the visitor centre, half-eaten."

"Well, looks like he's...

(•_•)
( •_•)>⌐■-■
(⌐■_■)

...gone extinct."

LMFAO! :laugh: :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 08, 2013, 06:33:02 PM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Sep 08, 2013, 02:17:57 PM
Im going to buy this for my car how cool haha :D

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Jurassic-Park-Jeep-Wrangler-Sahara-Explorer-Rearview-Mirror-Hang-Tag-Prop-JP-/300940334834?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&var=&hash=item46117116f2 (http://www.ebay.com/itm/Jurassic-Park-Jeep-Wrangler-Sahara-Explorer-Rearview-Mirror-Hang-Tag-Prop-JP-/300940334834?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&var=&hash=item46117116f2)
You need the license plate to go with it!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 09, 2013, 03:45:03 PM
Even more arrivals this past week and Alien3, I know you will especially will appreciate these 8)

http://instagram.com/p/d99jwHlEhx/ (http://instagram.com/p/d99jwHlEhx/)
http://instagram.com/p/eAiLMcFElG/ (http://instagram.com/p/eAiLMcFElG/)

Quote from: Omegazilla on Sep 08, 2013, 09:03:55 AM
Seriously though, we need a crossover.

'Those things, those like, dinosaurs, are just crazy stuff, man.'

"Fences are failing all over the park, *snort*"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sjy7pI1UdRw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sjy7pI1UdRw#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Sep 09, 2013, 09:19:31 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 09, 2013, 03:45:03 PM
Even more arrivals this past week and Alien3, I know you will especially will appreciate these 8)

http://instagram.com/p/d99jwHlEhx/ (http://instagram.com/p/d99jwHlEhx/)
http://instagram.com/p/eAiLMcFElG/ (http://instagram.com/p/eAiLMcFElG/)

Quote from: Omegazilla on Sep 08, 2013, 09:03:55 AM
Seriously though, we need a crossover.

'Those things, those like, dinosaurs, are just crazy stuff, man.'

"Fences are failing all over the park, *snort*"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sjy7pI1UdRw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sjy7pI1UdRw#ws)

Pure awesome.

http://instagram.com/p/d99jwHlEhx/# (http://instagram.com/p/d99jwHlEhx/#)

That Young T-Rex looks really cool tbh.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Sep 09, 2013, 09:21:28 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 09, 2013, 03:45:03 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Sep 08, 2013, 09:03:55 AM
Seriously though, we need a crossover.

'Those things, those like, dinosaurs, are just crazy stuff, man.'

"Fences are failing all over the park, *snort*"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sjy7pI1UdRw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sjy7pI1UdRw#ws)
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Yes!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 09, 2013, 09:30:41 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 09, 2013, 03:45:03 PM
Even more arrivals this past week and Alien3, I know you will especially will appreciate these 8)

http://instagram.com/p/d99jwHlEhx/ (http://instagram.com/p/d99jwHlEhx/)

Sweet mother of mercy, how did you afford those?!?! Congrats on the ultra rare haul man!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Sep 09, 2013, 09:39:01 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 09, 2013, 09:30:41 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 09, 2013, 03:45:03 PM
Even more arrivals this past week and Alien3, I know you will especially will appreciate these 8)

http://instagram.com/p/d99jwHlEhx/ (http://instagram.com/p/d99jwHlEhx/)

Sweet mother of mercy, how did you afford those?!?! Congrats on the ultra rare haul man!

Ah lovely picture of Jingoro!

You watch Kimagure Orange Road then ?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 09, 2013, 10:03:18 PM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Sep 09, 2013, 09:39:01 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 09, 2013, 09:30:41 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 09, 2013, 03:45:03 PM
Even more arrivals this past week and Alien3, I know you will especially will appreciate these 8)

http://instagram.com/p/d99jwHlEhx/ (http://instagram.com/p/d99jwHlEhx/)

Sweet mother of mercy, how did you afford those?!?! Congrats on the ultra rare haul man!

Ah lovely picture of Jingoro!

You watch Kimagure Orange Road then ?
Oh my yes! Definitely my 2nd favorite anime ever, next to Urusei Yatsura of course ;D Without a doubt, my favorite character is Madoka: such a hard ass, smart and so beautiful! I love the OVA when Kasuga switches places with the goldfish and Jingoro later on, hilarious!

I own the Anime-igo TV series box set, Anime-igo OVAs+movie box set, an ultra rare promo cloth slipcase of Madoka and Kasuga from Japan and an extremely rare promo cloth poster of Kasuga, Madoka and Hikaru from Japan. The poster is on my wall next to my huge cloth banner of Lum  holding a gun (also an original from Japan), what pretty faces to wake up to :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Sep 09, 2013, 10:26:48 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 09, 2013, 10:03:18 PM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Sep 09, 2013, 09:39:01 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 09, 2013, 09:30:41 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 09, 2013, 03:45:03 PM
Even more arrivals this past week and Alien3, I know you will especially will appreciate these 8)

http://instagram.com/p/d99jwHlEhx/ (http://instagram.com/p/d99jwHlEhx/)

Sweet mother of mercy, how did you afford those?!?! Congrats on the ultra rare haul man!

Ah lovely picture of Jingoro!

You watch Kimagure Orange Road then ?
Oh my yes! Definitely my 2nd favorite anime ever, next to Urusei Yatsura of course ;D Without a doubt, my favorite character is Madoka: such a hard ass, smart and so beautiful! I love the OVA when Kasuga switches places with the goldfish and Jingoro later on, hilarious!

I own the Anime-igo TV series box set, Anime-igo OVAs+movie box set, an ultra rare promo cloth slipcase of Madoka and Kasuga from Japan and an extremely rare promo cloth poster of Kasuga, Madoka and Hikaru from Japan. The poster is on my wall next to my huge cloth banner of Lum  holding a gun (also an original from Japan), what pretty faces to wake up to :D

Awesome :)

Jingoro is so adorable and love the random noise he makes lol.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 09, 2013, 10:37:56 PM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Sep 09, 2013, 10:26:48 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 09, 2013, 10:03:18 PM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Sep 09, 2013, 09:39:01 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 09, 2013, 09:30:41 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 09, 2013, 03:45:03 PM
Even more arrivals this past week and Alien3, I know you will especially will appreciate these 8)

http://instagram.com/p/d99jwHlEhx/ (http://instagram.com/p/d99jwHlEhx/)

Sweet mother of mercy, how did you afford those?!?! Congrats on the ultra rare haul man!

Ah lovely picture of Jingoro!

You watch Kimagure Orange Road then ?
Oh my yes! Definitely my 2nd favorite anime ever, next to Urusei Yatsura of course ;D Without a doubt, my favorite character is Madoka: such a hard ass, smart and so beautiful! I love the OVA when Kasuga switches places with the goldfish and Jingoro later on, hilarious!

I own the Anime-igo TV series box set, Anime-igo OVAs+movie box set, an ultra rare promo cloth slipcase of Madoka and Kasuga from Japan and an extremely rare promo cloth poster of Kasuga, Madoka and Hikaru from Japan. The poster is on my wall next to my huge cloth banner of Lum  holding a gun (also an original from Japan), what pretty faces to wake up to :D

Awesome :)

Jingoro is so adorable and love the random noise he makes lol.
He always gets the short end of the stick too, Kasuga's sisters make him want to escape from them all so badly. Interesting to note Jingoro is not in the manga.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Sep 09, 2013, 10:42:47 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 09, 2013, 10:37:56 PM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Sep 09, 2013, 10:26:48 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 09, 2013, 10:03:18 PM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Sep 09, 2013, 09:39:01 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 09, 2013, 09:30:41 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 09, 2013, 03:45:03 PM
Even more arrivals this past week and Alien3, I know you will especially will appreciate these 8)

http://instagram.com/p/d99jwHlEhx/ (http://instagram.com/p/d99jwHlEhx/)

Sweet mother of mercy, how did you afford those?!?! Congrats on the ultra rare haul man!

Ah lovely picture of Jingoro!

You watch Kimagure Orange Road then ?
Oh my yes! Definitely my 2nd favorite anime ever, next to Urusei Yatsura of course ;D Without a doubt, my favorite character is Madoka: such a hard ass, smart and so beautiful! I love the OVA when Kasuga switches places with the goldfish and Jingoro later on, hilarious!

I own the Anime-igo TV series box set, Anime-igo OVAs+movie box set, an ultra rare promo cloth slipcase of Madoka and Kasuga from Japan and an extremely rare promo cloth poster of Kasuga, Madoka and Hikaru from Japan. The poster is on my wall next to my huge cloth banner of Lum  holding a gun (also an original from Japan), what pretty faces to wake up to :D

Awesome :)

Jingoro is so adorable and love the random noise he makes lol.
He always gets the short end of the stick too, Kasuga's sisters make him want to escape from them all so badly. Interesting to note Jingoro is not in the manga.

I know!

Would have been awesome too have him featured in there, I absolutly loved them all.

I loved that episode where Kasuga is having a jog in the park i think it was ?  and this old man levitated Jingoro in the air was hillarious.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 10, 2013, 12:31:32 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 09, 2013, 03:45:03 PM
Even more arrivals this past week and Alien3, I know you will especially will appreciate these 8)

http://instagram.com/p/d99jwHlEhx/ (http://instagram.com/p/d99jwHlEhx/)
http://instagram.com/p/eAiLMcFElG/ (http://instagram.com/p/eAiLMcFElG/)


Some damn nice finds dude!
Keep up the good work.

Btw we have so much awesome Stuff coming to the podcast.
Check out our swish new website...

http://jp4e.blogspot.co.uk/ (http://jp4e.blogspot.co.uk/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 10, 2013, 02:23:52 AM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 09, 2013, 09:30:41 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 09, 2013, 03:45:03 PM
Even more arrivals this past week and Alien3, I know you will especially will appreciate these 8)

http://instagram.com/p/d99jwHlEhx/ (http://instagram.com/p/d99jwHlEhx/)

Sweet mother of mercy, how did you afford those?!?! Congrats on the ultra rare haul man!

Dealer deal! He gave me a small discount...plus a two week payment installment plan which helped too, lol. Thanks Fiorina!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 10, 2013, 03:09:00 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 10, 2013, 02:23:52 AM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 09, 2013, 09:30:41 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 09, 2013, 03:45:03 PM
Even more arrivals this past week and Alien3, I know you will especially will appreciate these 8)

http://instagram.com/p/d99jwHlEhx/ (http://instagram.com/p/d99jwHlEhx/)

Sweet mother of mercy, how did you afford those?!?! Congrats on the ultra rare haul man!

Dealer deal! He gave me a small discount...plus a two week payment installment plan which helped too, lol. Thanks Fiorina!
Yay discount and installment plan! After thinking about it, I owned the Young T-Rex when it came out way back when! I remember losing the skin cover piece at the local park lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 10, 2013, 02:57:58 PM
Um, so I kinda...just came to the conclusion that most of the JP merch I've bought lately is coming from these two Toy Gods, the father and son:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YN8uAQvnUjg# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YN8uAQvnUjg#)

I deduced it from the emails we've been exchanging. I just wrote him a big letter praise telling him as much.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Sep 11, 2013, 12:45:57 AM
Jeff Sneider @TheInSneider
BREAKING: UNIVERSAL sets JURASSIC WORLD (aka Jurassic Park 4) for June 12, 2015!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: botmetro on Sep 11, 2013, 12:57:22 AM
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=607607699284117&set=a.201423149902576.52889.170889472955944&type=1&theater (https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=607607699284117&set=a.201423149902576.52889.170889472955944&type=1&theater)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Sep 11, 2013, 12:59:00 AM
Jurassic....World?

Ehh?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Sep 11, 2013, 01:00:52 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Sep 11, 2013, 12:59:00 AM
Jurassic....World?

Ehh?

The world, NA. The world...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8u7px_GzWQ# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8u7px_GzWQ#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Sep 11, 2013, 01:04:23 AM
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=607607699284117&set=a.201423149902576.52889.170889472955944&type=1&theater (http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=607607699284117&set=a.201423149902576.52889.170889472955944&type=1&theater)

As far as titles go, it's ok. Could've been much worse. I think it's better than to keep adding numbers to it. Specially if it's a reboot.

I'm getting excited now  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Sep 11, 2013, 01:13:36 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Sep 11, 2013, 01:04:23 AM
As far as titles go, it's ok. Could've been much worse. I think it's better than to keep adding numbers to it.

Jurassic Park with a subtitle would have been the way to go, methinks. I don't really like the sound of Jurassic World at all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Sep 11, 2013, 01:14:06 AM
Nice title....

and i kinda get the feeling we are gonna witness an "aggressive expansion" from the Dinos onto the mainland. :P

or it'll be the new "brand name" for a newly opened Jurassic Park. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Sep 11, 2013, 01:16:56 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Sep 11, 2013, 01:14:06 AM
and i kinda get the feeling we are gonna witness an "aggressive expansion" from the Dinos onto the mainland. :P

"If there is one thing the history of evolution has taught us it's that life will not be contained. Life breaks free, it expands to new territories and crashes through barriers, painfully, maybe even dangerously, but, uh... well, there it is."

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages2.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20111124071519%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2Fc%2Fc6%2FJP-IanMalcolm.jpg&hash=dab9076db06b674f913489fc3f435ec788913f96)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Sep 11, 2013, 01:19:01 AM
inb4

Tamed, smarter Attack-Dinos for military use.

;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Sep 11, 2013, 01:22:15 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Sep 11, 2013, 01:19:01 AM
inb4

Tamed, smarter Attack-Dinos for military use.

;D

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi959.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fae77%2Fproject412%2FUntitled_zps84edfea4.png&hash=63339755fccf976f2a887b808733ebb84ed37a61)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Sep 11, 2013, 01:23:39 AM
I'd laugh my ass off if that was "exactly" the idea they were running with... just a re-written version of the John Sayles script.

"suck on that fanboys!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Sep 11, 2013, 01:25:28 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zvqGDfdfmM# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zvqGDfdfmM#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Sep 11, 2013, 01:26:08 AM
Jurassic Planet

You keep the JP and everything! Someone get that to a producer.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Sep 11, 2013, 01:29:36 AM
I think I'll just save my money for Jurassic Universe:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_kxuecv4jmo1qai80h.jpg&hash=b4346904ee3a8f07854893d3cdbd12e8f4512dce)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Sep 11, 2013, 01:32:19 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Sep 11, 2013, 01:29:36 AM
I think I'll just save my money for Jurassic Universe:

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_kxuecv4jmo1qai80h.jpg

The Arkham games will have to catch up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Sep 11, 2013, 01:34:33 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Sep 11, 2013, 01:32:19 AM
The Arkham games will have to catch up.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffaceplantreview.files.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F07%2Fbatman-space.gif&hash=caac44e1476f4eff91fbb9fc462f578064ff716b)

Space Batman is the best Batman.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Sep 11, 2013, 01:47:59 AM
"Sea World"... "Jurassic World"... the blue logo...

The rumours of the storyline featuring a "lake"....

MARINE REPTILES MADAFAKA!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Sep 11, 2013, 02:21:21 AM
(https://fbcdn-photos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/1185508_10151647494807199_703856767_n.jpg)

Ehhhhhh.

Gotta let it soak in.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 11, 2013, 02:23:47 AM
Let's go for it! I think it would be neat but then the CGI will ruin everything, as it has to almost every modern movie past 1995.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Sep 11, 2013, 02:29:33 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Sep 11, 2013, 02:21:21 AM
https://fbcdn-photos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/1185508_10151647494807199_703856767_n.jpg

Ehhhhhh.

Gotta let it soak in.

Don't soak it too much. Marine reptiles and all  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Sep 11, 2013, 05:05:42 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Sep 11, 2013, 02:21:21 AM
https://fbcdn-photos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/1185508_10151647494807199_703856767_n.jpg
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F7s67nsW.gif&hash=375db91c0aebf0f26dbad4f6e579bd1d514a72b3)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Sep 11, 2013, 05:08:27 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Sep 11, 2013, 05:05:42 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Sep 11, 2013, 02:21:21 AM
https://fbcdn-photos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/1185508_10151647494807199_703856767_n.jpg
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F7s67nsW.gif&hash=375db91c0aebf0f26dbad4f6e579bd1d514a72b3)
Smug faced bitch Carolina.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 11, 2013, 08:11:40 AM
I love the title. Very fitting.

Jurassic Park
The Lost World: Jurassic Park
Jurassic Park 3
Jurassic World
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Sep 11, 2013, 08:24:24 AM
Pfffft, Disney Land, Disney World.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Sep 11, 2013, 08:57:08 AM
Ok wtf ?

Jurassic World ? lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Sep 11, 2013, 09:17:07 AM
Dat blue backdrop too. Seems like the new attraction at Universal Studios.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Sep 11, 2013, 09:26:11 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Sep 11, 2013, 09:17:07 AM
Dat blue backdrop too. Seems like the new attraction at Universal Studios.

Water Dinos :D

Kronosaurus maybe? :P

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.toptenz.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F06%2Fimage0112.jpg&hash=d5dd2bc41e014d3bb14ae9bd152582dd0b364f1f)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Sep 11, 2013, 10:14:51 AM
It's fitting, considering how they want this to be a pseudo-reboot-sequel. I've faith in Trevorrow tbh.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 11, 2013, 11:29:38 AM
I'm not sold on the title. It sounds like a lame kid's story.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Sep 11, 2013, 11:39:48 AM
It just sounds too much like a scy-fy channel knock off. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Sep 11, 2013, 11:57:47 AM
Yeah, logo and title are total shit, but the director is awesome and the script writers are sci-fi blockbuster competent, so I'll hold hope that the actual movie will contain some good stuff.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 11, 2013, 12:06:36 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 11, 2013, 11:29:38 AM
I'm not sold on the title. It sounds like a lame kid's story.

Quote from: King Rathalos on Sep 11, 2013, 11:39:48 AM
It just sounds too much like a scy-fy channel knock off. :P

If Jurassic Park was called originally called Jurassic World you wouldn't be saying that.



Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 11, 2013, 12:08:05 PM
Well it wasn't so that's a moot point.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 11, 2013, 12:10:16 PM
So why is Jurassic World a bad title?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Sep 11, 2013, 12:10:47 PM
I'm calling it now. The Asylum's film is going to be Jurassic Planet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 11, 2013, 12:16:53 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 11, 2013, 12:10:16 PM
So why is Jurassic World a bad title?

I just said why.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 11, 2013, 11:29:38 AMIt sounds like a lame kid's story.

And also, when I hear in my head, "Welcome, to Jurassic World" it doesn't evoke the same emotions as "Welcome, to Jurassic Park". Say it aloud and you'll see what I mean.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 11, 2013, 12:23:31 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 11, 2013, 12:16:53 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 11, 2013, 12:10:16 PM
So why is Jurassic World a bad title?

I just said why.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 11, 2013, 11:29:38 AMIt sounds like a lame kid's story.

And also, when I hear in my head, "Welcome, to Jurassic World" it doesn't evoke the same emotions as "Welcome, to Jurassic Park". Say it aloud and you'll see what I mean.

Why would I do that? It's a new film, not the original, hopefully its not trending old ground. Jurassic World envokes images of dinosaurs in a working park, dinosaurs around the globe, or something we haven't thought of yet. It's a new beginning.

As Trevorrow said he's trying to bring the old feelings back whilst doing something new. The title Jurassic World proves this.

Plus Jurassic Park sounds like a lame kids story if you don't know what it is.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Sep 11, 2013, 12:26:29 PM
I bet they're going with an infection plot, hence World.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Sep 11, 2013, 12:33:31 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 11, 2013, 12:10:16 PM
So why is Jurassic World a bad title?
Because Jurassic Park was the name of a setting, something that was branded in-universe, so it had actual relevance. The series has been Jurassic Park right up until now; why couldn't they just call it "Jurassic Park: ________" or flipped around ala The Lost World? It literally sounds either like an Asylum knockoff or a new Universal Studios attraction (which I actually thought it was, that or something in the vein of whatever the hell 'Jurassic Park NUBLAR' was, when I saw the logo without the context that it was in any way official on Facebook) that focuses on Jurassic Park stuff. Whether it's a new park in the story or if it's relating to a world-wide 'take over' event or whatever, at this point it's flat sounding corny as f**k. That simple.

And the shift to blue? Pretty lame. The red/yellow, whether it was a T-rex or even goddamn Spinosaurus, looked fittingly ominous.

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.cdn.turner.com%2Ftntla%2Fimages%2Fportal%2F10108%2F37298%2F75244%2F1282049.jpg&hash=9ba1f330bc2f7567031cd6d481ef978dd25c2261)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.tumblr.com%2Fgqewljp%2FFc7m6148w%2Fjurassic_park.jpg&hash=c0f7c08b426aa2e91692970121c245f6985d5bb0)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages2.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20100601085536%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2F9%2F9e%2FThe_Lost_World_Jurassic_Park.jpg&hash=2532722b0145dc34f9c9f1a76a287f646228074d)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.priory-campus.co.uk%2Fdreamweaver%2Fmarkcurry%2Fimages%2Fjp3logo.jpg&hash=cf55f886db1a240bb11833f6e8693ce92874a892)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fl2.yimg.com%2Fbt%2Fapi%2Fres%2F1.2%2FT9TmkVwNDnwG3kXMnDnKiw--%2FYXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7cT04NTt3PTYwMA--%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fl.yimg.com%2Fos%2Fpublish-images%2Fmovies%2F2013-09-10%2Fe419f2f2-b44b-4d5c-8110-1c92c103f13f_jurassic_world_logo_crop.jpg&hash=159e5678bf6a211e21e151943d24558d4e266196)
[close]

I'm not sure if I'm surprised that you're the one who loves it, or if I shouldn't be, seeing as after all the no-show hype you were bound to love it unconditionally. Not trying to change your mind, but at least understand it from the perspective of everybody else that doesn't like it. They'll still see the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 11, 2013, 12:41:19 PM
All that from a single word, and one colour change in the logo/title?

Plus remember, an island or a room can be a world. Not necessarily the entire planet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Sep 11, 2013, 12:55:22 PM
You wanted an explanation, I decided to be thorough.

And why would they bother to change it to 'world' if it didn't imply a larger scale?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 11, 2013, 01:01:32 PM
That might be the case, we just don't know yet.

There's no reason to panic at this time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Sep 11, 2013, 01:03:39 PM
The way I see it, nobody's panicking. Just expressing that they don't like the film's title. I'm one of them.

I'm still certainly going to see the movie, as the talent behind it seems pitch-perfect and I'm a huge fan of the first film, but that doesn't make the title Jurassic World sound any less cringe-worthy to me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Sep 11, 2013, 01:26:15 PM
Jurassic World sounds like the name of a cg dinosaur documentary to me.

...Actually can we have the new movie be a documentary-styled movie of the park? Like all from the view of a camera-man helping to film a documentary of a now working Jurassic Park, and then like the first movie shit goes wrong. This time though we have different dinosaurs, settings, and a different viewpoint as the chaos ensues.


I'd pay to watch it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Sep 11, 2013, 01:27:45 PM
Eh, I don't really see a found footage Jurassic Park film working.

Mockumentry bits (like District 9) would be cool, but not full on found footage.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Sep 11, 2013, 01:34:28 PM
Oh neither do I. I never meant to imply it would all be found footage. It would def be more like District 9 in style than, say, cloverfield where everything is from one camera.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 11, 2013, 01:40:23 PM
Con footage. This might be test footage.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZL_5xh4pjc (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZL_5xh4pjc)

[UPDATE] this was a pitch for a game of the same name.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Sep 11, 2013, 01:46:10 PM
...Why is it animated like a goddamn cg cartoon.


Like holy f**k is it a departure from the other Jurassic Park movies cgi.


...Actually what about this is Jurassic Park still? Cause I got more Primeval vibes from that clip than Jurassic Park vibes.



...Do kinda like that logo at the end though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Sep 11, 2013, 01:52:48 PM
There... is no way that what I just watched was official in any way, shape, or form. Not even test footage. More like... a fan film that got to the 'World' title first.

[Edit] Lulz, just goes to show how fan-made that title comes across as.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 11, 2013, 02:03:25 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Sep 11, 2013, 01:52:48 PM
Lulz, just goes to show how fan-made that title comes across as.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_m21kdlgZHO1r5r6l6o1_500.gif&hash=bc87e1aea32453a0c33bbe0545ab0996712ceaee)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: coolbreeze on Sep 11, 2013, 02:12:17 PM
Like Sweeps said, Jurassic World sounds like an Asylum film..

Not impressed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Sep 11, 2013, 02:19:09 PM
...all this nit picking over the title of a kids movie.

lulz.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 11, 2013, 02:26:31 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Sep 11, 2013, 02:19:09 PM
...all this nit picking over the title of a kids movie.

*Ahem* Family movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 11, 2013, 02:28:44 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 11, 2013, 01:01:32 PM
There's no reason to panic at this time.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w09rqkY0hbg# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w09rqkY0hbg#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Sep 11, 2013, 03:30:48 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fecx.images-amazon.com%2Fimages%2FI%2F51MCKHQMZHL.jpg&hash=9a54eb0b9c0cc8a1b73e4719a083ccd5153162f0)

http://www.amazon.com/Michael-Crichtons-Jurassic-World-Crichton/dp/0375401075 (http://www.amazon.com/Michael-Crichtons-Jurassic-World-Crichton/dp/0375401075)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Sep 11, 2013, 03:41:43 PM
I'm open enough to it. All that matters is if the film is good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Sep 11, 2013, 03:44:04 PM
The footage is from a cancelled game anyway.

And thankfully, because it looks awful for a JP film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Sep 11, 2013, 04:12:35 PM
It had the same title as the film, though... so Quetzalcoatlus seems to be ready for his close-up on the 4th film. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 11, 2013, 05:25:22 PM
[UPDATE]

Okay so apparently that footage IS a pitch for Jurassic World (JP4) it was made to just get studio big wigs pumped.

I'm stoked.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Sep 11, 2013, 05:33:51 PM
I really, really hope that is not an example of how they'll threat photography and dinosaur characterization.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Sep 11, 2013, 05:41:39 PM
Pitch trailers are wildly different from the final products and quickly put together.

That being said, I think they're going for the "open park direction" instead of bringing the dinos to the mainland. What Trevorrow has said in the past supports this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Sep 11, 2013, 07:13:48 PM
It's just made to sell the film to producers. not for public consumption. :P

It certainly got me pumped! :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Sep 11, 2013, 07:46:33 PM
QuoteColin Trevorrow ‏@colintrevorrow

Alright, Phil. We're going to give you one last chance. Keep your eyes peeled and remember, they can open doors. #JurassicWorld
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Sep 11, 2013, 07:47:07 PM
PHIL TIPPET, MADAFAKAS!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Sep 11, 2013, 07:47:40 PM
You had one job to do!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Sep 11, 2013, 07:51:26 PM
And he did it so well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Sep 11, 2013, 08:14:49 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Sep 11, 2013, 12:45:57 AM
Jeff Sneider @TheInSneider
BREAKING: UNIVERSAL sets JURASSIC WORLD (aka Jurassic Park 4) for June 12, 2015!




holy crapppppppppppppppp this is gonna suck so god damn much
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Sep 11, 2013, 08:50:59 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Sep 11, 2013, 08:14:49 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Sep 11, 2013, 12:45:57 AM
Jeff Sneider @TheInSneider
BREAKING: UNIVERSAL sets JURASSIC WORLD (aka Jurassic Park 4) for June 12, 2015!




holy crapppppppppppppppp this is gonna suck so god damn much

lol aspie is posting in JP thread again. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Sep 11, 2013, 10:38:39 PM
Troll he is.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Sep 11, 2013, 11:18:54 PM
I wonder if the movie studio had to pay off Asylum to use the "Jurassic World" title, because we all know Asylum was going to produce a knock off JP4 under that title.


Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Sep 11, 2013, 11:22:10 PM
It was either gonna be that or Cretaceous Park.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 12, 2013, 01:30:13 AM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Sep 11, 2013, 11:22:10 PM
It was either gonna be that or Cretaceous Park.

Don't you mean Cretaceous World? :P

'Cause World sounds like something they'd put.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Sep 12, 2013, 01:58:49 AM
Yeah but we're keeping in mind that most Asylum movies go by the logic of "If we make it's name sound as close as possible to this big movie, without getting our ass sued, maybe a few dumb people will make a mistake!"

Though with the 4th movie's name, Cretaceous World does seem like a possibility.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Sep 12, 2013, 02:10:49 AM
Jurassic World may be the first movie in history to have a direct and shameful rip off film made and still receive better reviews than the original.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Sep 12, 2013, 02:20:17 AM
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/64111 (http://www.aintitcool.com/node/64111)

here they say the pitch video is two years old... made by another director before Colin Trevorrow came aboard. :P

QuoteThis reel was presented at last July's STAR WARS Celebration in Germany by concept artist Iain McCaig (creator of Darth Maul). According to McCaig, "it certainly got Steven interested in dinosaurs again."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Sep 12, 2013, 02:28:39 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Sep 11, 2013, 07:46:33 PM
QuoteColin Trevorrow ‏@colintrevorrow

Alright, Phil. We're going to give you one last chance. Keep your eyes peeled and remember, they can open doors. #JurassicWorld

There's also rumors of Jeff Goldblum possibly returning now....

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 12, 2013, 02:32:00 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Sep 12, 2013, 02:28:39 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Sep 11, 2013, 07:46:33 PM
QuoteColin Trevorrow ‏@colintrevorrow

Alright, Phil. We're going to give you one last chance. Keep your eyes peeled and remember, they can open doors. #JurassicWorld

There's also rumors of Jeff Goldblum possibly returning now....
Put that in the "WIN!" category!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 12, 2013, 02:39:52 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Sep 12, 2013, 02:28:39 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Sep 11, 2013, 07:46:33 PM
QuoteColin Trevorrow ‏@colintrevorrow

Alright, Phil. We're going to give you one last chance. Keep your eyes peeled and remember, they can open doors. #JurassicWorld

There's also rumors of Jeff Goldblum possibly returning now....

That's encouraging. Now, what about Sam Neill? We need him too!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Sep 12, 2013, 02:41:09 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Sep 12, 2013, 02:28:39 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Sep 11, 2013, 07:46:33 PM
QuoteColin Trevorrow ‏@colintrevorrow

Alright, Phil. We're going to give you one last chance. Keep your eyes peeled and remember, they can open doors. #JurassicWorld

There's also rumors of Jeff Goldblum possibly returning now....
Count me in...
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmediafiles.cineplex.com%2FBlog%2FEnglish%2FFullSize%2FJeffGoldblum07.jpg&hash=440b0afafc12a1be56d050ad470b9db2cdfce8a7)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Sep 12, 2013, 02:51:27 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Sep 11, 2013, 07:46:33 PM
QuoteColin Trevorrow ‏@colintrevorrow

Alright, Phil. We're going to give you one last chance. Keep your eyes peeled and remember, they can open doors. #JurassicWorld
:laugh:

So awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 12, 2013, 07:21:58 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Sep 12, 2013, 02:10:49 AM
Jurassic World may be the first movie in history to have a direct and shameful rip off film made and still receive better reviews than the original.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstream1.gifsoup.com%2Fview3%2F1134492%2Fyawn-o.gif&hash=c55e26a888bde1665cd26272eefdb5df72867e38)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Sep 12, 2013, 10:29:32 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Sep 12, 2013, 02:28:39 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Sep 11, 2013, 07:46:33 PM
QuoteColin Trevorrow ‏@colintrevorrow

Alright, Phil. We're going to give you one last chance. Keep your eyes peeled and remember, they can open doors. #JurassicWorld

There's also rumors of Jeff Goldblum possibly returning now....

Awesome!


"Original stars Richard Attenborough and Jeff Goldblum are rumoured to return to their parts as John Hammond and Dr Ian Malcolm, although nothing has been confirmed by Universal."

Guess time will tell now...

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/news/fourth-jurassic-park-film-to-be-called-jurassic-world-8808762.html (http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/news/fourth-jurassic-park-film-to-be-called-jurassic-world-8808762.html)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Sep 12, 2013, 11:33:53 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Sep 12, 2013, 02:51:27 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Sep 11, 2013, 07:46:33 PM
QuoteColin Trevorrow ‏@colintrevorrow

Alright, Phil. We're going to give you one last chance. Keep your eyes peeled and remember, they can open doors. #JurassicWorld
:laugh:

So awesome.
Funniest thing is Tippett is actually annoyed by that meme.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Sep 12, 2013, 01:01:20 PM
Why though?  :laugh:

It's so great.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Sep 12, 2013, 01:26:52 PM
He simply got tired of it I think.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DC on Sep 12, 2013, 01:40:46 PM
I loved the first two.

Hated JP III.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Sep 12, 2013, 01:44:18 PM
That's not really all that ironic, seeing as JP3 is utter shit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DC on Sep 12, 2013, 01:49:28 PM
Tru dis.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Sep 12, 2013, 02:01:16 PM
TLW is pretty shit, too. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DC on Sep 12, 2013, 02:03:24 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Sep 12, 2013, 02:01:16 PM
TLW is pretty shit, too. :P
I love it, too many memories and nostalgia for me not to. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 12, 2013, 05:25:35 PM
Speaking of JP 3, look what I got today:

http://instagram.com/p/eKxXi3lEm0/ (http://instagram.com/p/eKxXi3lEm0/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 12, 2013, 09:28:34 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 12, 2013, 05:25:35 PM
Speaking of JP 3, look what I got today:

http://instagram.com/p/eKxXi3lEm0/ (http://instagram.com/p/eKxXi3lEm0/)
I agree completely with your photo description
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Sep 12, 2013, 10:32:07 PM
Nice snag, Doom!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Sep 13, 2013, 08:56:18 AM
"For us I think it's about recreating a feeling you had...in 1993."

But is it going to FEEL exactly like the first one though ?

"For us I think it's about recreating a feeling you had...in 1993.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/24044783 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/24044783)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 13, 2013, 11:19:48 AM
QuoteI think it's important to make a movie for the fans. But I also have to remember that there's a lot of people who just couldn't care less

I find this encouraging. Colin really does have a level head here.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 14, 2013, 09:50:57 AM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Sep 13, 2013, 08:56:18 AM
http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/24044783 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/24044783)

Yeah we were plugged on the BBC 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Sep 14, 2013, 02:20:18 PM
Jurassic World...huh.

For some reason, I don't want to see dinosaurs released on the world. For one, it wouldn't make much sense what with guns and all, and two...I want it to stay on the island.

Quote from: DC on Sep 12, 2013, 01:40:46 PM
I loved the first two.

Hated JP III.

PREACH it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 14, 2013, 03:00:18 PM
Hate is such a strong word.

JP3 is okay.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Sep 14, 2013, 04:01:13 PM
lawl. The John Sayles jp4 draft was already miles ahead of JP3's lazy crap. It actually had a theme for once, continuing Lost World's ideas of wildlife protection. It even HAD likeable main characters unlike that scheisse 3rd flick.

It had Pterosaurs and Compies on the main land btw. As the only two logical "escapees" from the island. One via obvious flight, the compies through "clinging to small logs and broken trees, taken from the island to the main land via strong currents.". Just like small lizards, mammals and insects have done for millions of years.
ex:
QuoteAnimals such as iguanas, rice rats and tortoises are believed to have come from the South American mainland. The scenario is something like this: In a rough storm, some animals get flooded out of their homes and into a river, where they cling to a fallen tree or some other clump of vegetation. The river washes them out to sea, where they miraculously survive until they wash up on the shores of Galapagos.
http://www.galapagosislands.com/blog/endemic-animals-of-galapagos/ (http://www.galapagosislands.com/blog/endemic-animals-of-galapagos/)

It doesnt make much sense for any other big animals on Nublar or Sorna to travel away "naturally" from the island... unless they were taken out by humans.. again. :P Or maybe they'll show "some" of the mid-sized dinosaurs swimming, like elephants do? :P
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpD40ewOyC4# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpD40ewOyC4#)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F_DAAcHJHDRPU%2FR3rYWbdu8pI%2FAAAAAAAAAFo%2FO-VJXbPHoo8%2Fs1600%2Ft-rex%2Be%2Bbote.bmp&hash=4b8ede20e14f133895eeec1a4dee1038570f6013)
^from the lost world game concept art.

The film will probably be about the "efforts" to contain the dinos, then. :P At least that's what the film "pitch" footage hints at. :P

Sorry for geeking out just a tiny bit. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Sep 14, 2013, 04:59:20 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Sep 14, 2013, 04:01:13 PM
lawl. The John Sayles jp4 draft was already miles ahead of JP3's lazy crap. It actually had a theme for once, continuing Lost World's ideas of wildlife protection. It even HAD likeable main characters unlike that scheisse 3rd flick.

It had Pterosaurs and Compies on the main land btw. As the only two logical "escapees" from the island. One via obvious flight, the compies through "clinging to small logs and broken trees, taken from the island to the main land via strong currents.". Just like small lizards, mammals and insects have done for millions of years.
ex:
QuoteAnimals such as iguanas, rice rats and tortoises are believed to have come from the South American mainland. The scenario is something like this: In a rough storm, some animals get flooded out of their homes and into a river, where they cling to a fallen tree or some other clump of vegetation. The river washes them out to sea, where they miraculously survive until they wash up on the shores of Galapagos.
http://www.galapagosislands.com/blog/endemic-animals-of-galapagos/ (http://www.galapagosislands.com/blog/endemic-animals-of-galapagos/)

It doesnt make much sense for any other big animals on Nublar or Sorna to travel away "naturally" from the island... unless they were taken out by humans.. again. :P Or maybe they'll show "some" of the mid-sized dinosaurs swimming, like elephants do? :P
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpD40ewOyC4# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpD40ewOyC4#)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F_DAAcHJHDRPU%2FR3rYWbdu8pI%2FAAAAAAAAAFo%2FO-VJXbPHoo8%2Fs1600%2Ft-rex%2Be%2Bbote.bmp&hash=4b8ede20e14f133895eeec1a4dee1038570f6013)
^from the lost world game concept art.

The film will probably be about the "efforts" to contain the dinos, then. :P At least that's what the film "pitch" footage hints at. :P

Sorry for geeking out just a tiny bit. :laugh:

I'd be cool with a containment story.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Sep 14, 2013, 05:31:14 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Sep 11, 2013, 01:52:48 PM
There... is no way that what I just watched was official in any way, shape, or form. Not even test footage. More like... a fan film that got to the 'World' title first.

[Edit] Lulz, just goes to show how fan-made that title comes across as.

I'm actually kinda of breathing a sigh of relief since it was the basic premise of one of the things I've been working on fan/film wise.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Sep 14, 2013, 10:35:54 PM

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_lr3relFsJm1qbqrz6o1_500.gif&hash=1a17cf8ec5f9b842928ee83d2b1e4010814bbcae)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_lr3relFsJm1qbqrz6o2_500.gif&hash=589721b9f9c5c008dc19a5a4eba71ddf8dfda6dd)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 15, 2013, 03:15:11 AM
Bitch-ass dinos be lovin' dat white meat.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 15, 2013, 03:48:47 AM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Sep 14, 2013, 10:35:54 PM

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_lr3relFsJm1qbqrz6o1_500.gif&hash=1a17cf8ec5f9b842928ee83d2b1e4010814bbcae)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_lr3relFsJm1qbqrz6o2_500.gif&hash=589721b9f9c5c008dc19a5a4eba71ddf8dfda6dd)
Wu-tang raptas ain't nuttin to f*ck wit!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DJ Pu$$yface on Sep 15, 2013, 03:56:18 AM
all dis glorious butthurt over the name

its glorious
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on Sep 16, 2013, 06:52:25 PM
You guys know that the so called leaked pitch footage for jurassic world. Is NOT for the upcoming jurassic park movie but was for a game with the same name that was cancelled a while ago. No connections to jurassic park whatsoever.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Sep 16, 2013, 08:18:06 PM
We also know that the "video game pitch" has been reported to be a cover up of sorts for the fact that the footage was leaked.

If it was a video game pitch... what company made it?  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Sep 17, 2013, 02:38:39 PM
Everyone read this: http://badassdigest.com/2013/09/16/the-true-story-behind-the-jurassic-world-pitch-reel/ (http://badassdigest.com/2013/09/16/the-true-story-behind-the-jurassic-world-pitch-reel/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Sep 17, 2013, 04:13:03 PM
Yeah.... okay.. i'll buy that...

but Devin Faraci is also the same dude that reported that Jurassic Park 4 had gun toting human-dino-hybrid mercenaries.. despite the John Sayles script having 0 human-dino hybrids and no dinosaurs picking up a gun... ever.

so expect a certain amount of bullshit from him.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Sep 17, 2013, 08:46:52 PM
Well, this backs up everything we've heard from Trevorrow in the past few months.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DC on Sep 18, 2013, 12:44:23 AM
After III I won't hold my breath, but I won't write it off just yet either. Could still be very good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Elliott on Sep 18, 2013, 04:14:51 AM
Anyone else think the Rex's appearance at the end is actually just the cover of "Age of Reptiles: Tribal Warfare"?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DC on Sep 18, 2013, 06:22:03 AM
Quote from: Galli on Sep 18, 2013, 04:14:51 AM
Anyone else think the Rex's appearance at the end is actually just the cover of "Age of Reptiles: Tribal Warfare"?
Yes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 18, 2013, 11:24:19 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Sep 17, 2013, 02:38:39 PM
Everyone read this: http://badassdigest.com/2013/09/16/the-true-story-behind-the-jurassic-world-pitch-reel/ (http://badassdigest.com/2013/09/16/the-true-story-behind-the-jurassic-world-pitch-reel/)

Quoteideas for a new film, one where dinosaurs would begin attacking California - basically a bigger scale version of Jurassic Park: The Lost World.

Not sure which idea I dislike more. This, or dino-human hybrids.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DC on Sep 18, 2013, 11:43:41 AM
Hate them bolth.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Sep 18, 2013, 01:23:41 PM
Good thing they're not going with any of those ideas.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Sep 18, 2013, 02:25:58 PM
Just f-ing bring in Lewis Dogson and BioSyn.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Sep 18, 2013, 04:14:45 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Sep 18, 2013, 02:25:58 PM
Just f-ing bring in Lewis Dogson and BioSyn.

Bringing in BioSyn would be the best thing to do with this film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Sep 18, 2013, 05:42:20 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 18, 2013, 11:24:19 AM
Not sure which idea I dislike more. This, or dino-human hybrids.

...there were never any dino-human hybrids in the Sayles script. There were Deinonychus with a few extra genes from dogs, humans and Ornitholestes.

Would anyone describe the dinos in the original film as Dino-Frog hybrids just because they had a few extra frog genes? :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 18, 2013, 05:59:25 PM
Spielberg's original idea waaaaaaaaaaay back when JP IV was first discussed was human-dinosaur soldiers.

Yeah.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Sep 18, 2013, 06:02:29 PM
Nope. His idea and the script that John Sayles did was about tamed deinonychus and dilophosaurus being used as improved "attack dogs" for military uses. :P Crazy, sure. But the original film was about female dinosaurs with frog dna that also had magical penis growing abilities. :laugh: (Jurassic Park was a film about futanari dinosaurs, deal with it.)  ;D

And they never picked up a gun at any point during the script, either. lol.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Sep 18, 2013, 06:46:22 PM
A sex-changing species is able to turn female genitalia into male ones (and vice-versa) when the sex change occurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Sep 18, 2013, 06:56:31 PM
and futanari - japanese term for hermaphodite wich is what species with those abilites are classed as. (Sequential Hermaphrodites to be exact.)

Mighty Hermaphrodite Dinosaurs - The Movie by Steven Spielberg.

quite a badass film, that was.

P.S: i think this was the frog that inspired that part of the original story, btw: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_reed_frog (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_reed_frog)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Sep 18, 2013, 07:03:26 PM
Yeah (though there is no evidence they are sequential).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Sep 18, 2013, 07:20:39 PM
You don't even have to assume that Jurassic Park's dinosaurs changed sex to reproduce. Many amphibians (from whence, inexplicably, some of JP's gap-filling DNA is sourced) and some reptiles reproduce asexually in one-gender communities. There are even freak occurrences of it happening in birds.

As for training dinosaurs as "attack animals" or any other form of husbandry, in my opinion it is scientifically very plausible (beyond the gigantic leap of cloning dinosaurs in the first place), but I don't really want to see it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Sep 18, 2013, 07:42:56 PM
Yup, i remember some news about snakes giving "virgin birth" to offspring that were essentially genetic clones of the mother.

Are you sure you dont want to see a genetically engineered team of deinonychus and dilophosaurus taking down and devouring kidnappers and drug dealers that are armed to their teeth? :laugh:

Spoilers: in the draft that leaked the dinosaurs were being mistreated by most of their keepers, so they kept trying to break free of the training facilities and during the final "mission", after taking down drug dealers in south america.. they do exactly that. So it still had the vibes of the original film of it being about animals trying to escape from the confinements that "man" put them in. Plus it also had the themes of animal welfare of the second film. The protagonist, responsible for their military training, was working secretly for Richard Hammond (of the original film) and was under close watch by the fellas responsible for breeding the "attack dinos"... So it worked as a sort of Spy story in the jurassic park universe, with a protagonist that was under danger from his bosses at Grendel Corporation and under danger from the very dinosaurs that he was working with... both of wich could turn against him at any moments notice. I felt that it was fun and it was a couple of drafts away from being a really solid Jurassic Park feature... it already felt better than the 3rd film at least. :P

If i were to rewrite it, first thing would be to put Byosin in there instead of the swiss Grendel Corporation... but i digress. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Sep 18, 2013, 08:12:48 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Sep 18, 2013, 04:14:45 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Sep 18, 2013, 02:25:58 PM
Just f-ing bring in Lewis Dogson and BioSyn.

Bringing in BioSyn would be the best thing to do with this film.

I agree.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 18, 2013, 11:52:20 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Sep 18, 2013, 02:25:58 PM
Just f-ing bring in Lewis Dogson and BioSyn.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F24.media.tumblr.com%2Fde44837589c87fe60b496548377cd7a9%2Ftumblr_mjep6rVbZ61qfsk6co1_500.jpg&hash=9bbcc31330ecb37c6f081093e945d861717848dd)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Sep 19, 2013, 01:23:11 AM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 18, 2013, 11:52:20 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Sep 18, 2013, 02:25:58 PM
Just f-ing bring in Lewis Dogson and BioSyn.
http://24.media.tumblr.com/de44837589c87fe60b496548377cd7a9/tumblr_mjep6rVbZ61qfsk6co1_500.jpg

That's awesome :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 19, 2013, 02:42:43 AM
And another addition for today!

http://instagram.com/p/ea7t4CFEuD/ (http://instagram.com/p/ea7t4CFEuD/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 20, 2013, 02:56:08 AM
Found this on the youtube:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGeEg0mtvXg# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGeEg0mtvXg#)

Pretty neat, considering I never seen it before or on the DVDs...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Sep 20, 2013, 10:28:48 AM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 18, 2013, 11:52:20 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Sep 18, 2013, 02:25:58 PM
Just f-ing bring in Lewis Dogson and BioSyn.
http://24.media.tumblr.com/de44837589c87fe60b496548377cd7a9/tumblr_mjep6rVbZ61qfsk6co1_500.jpg

What film is that from ?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 20, 2013, 11:34:14 AM
Dude...seriously?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Sep 20, 2013, 11:57:51 AM
lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Sep 20, 2013, 12:40:38 PM
No am joking...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 21, 2013, 02:11:55 PM
I love your sig Requiem28.

Glorious logos...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi374.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Foo183%2FJAROSHULK28%2F428505_468915059787118_214535163TSckukzps5876553a_zps7c1f8358.jpg&hash=04c852c8e74e406bc66d44ed63f2cb21cce607d8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Sep 21, 2013, 02:46:06 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 18, 2013, 11:52:20 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Sep 18, 2013, 02:25:58 PM
Just f-ing bring in Lewis Dogson and BioSyn.
http://24.media.tumblr.com/de44837589c87fe60b496548377cd7a9/tumblr_mjep6rVbZ61qfsk6co1_500.jpg
:laugh: :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 21, 2013, 04:08:54 PM
New update for you guys...

http://jp4e.blogspot.co.uk/ (http://jp4e.blogspot.co.uk/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Sep 21, 2013, 04:53:52 PM
Quite liked the Harvey Jason podcast. Good one.

Curious about the next guests......

Also.. get John Sayles in there to discuss his JP4 draft and the behind the scenes of that era and how the hell did such an influential indie filmmaker find himself writing such a crazy Jurassic Park script. ;) Should be fun and fascinating. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 23, 2013, 11:38:24 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 21, 2013, 02:11:55 PM
I love your sig Requiem28.

Glorious logos...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi374.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Foo183%2FJAROSHULK28%2F428505_468915059787118_214535163TSckukzps5876553a_zps7c1f8358.jpg&hash=04c852c8e74e406bc66d44ed63f2cb21cce607d8)

Nice collage. The latter two really do stick out like sore thumbs, don't they?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Sep 23, 2013, 02:39:42 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 23, 2013, 11:38:24 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 21, 2013, 02:11:55 PM
I love your sig Requiem28.

Glorious logos...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi374.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Foo183%2FJAROSHULK28%2F428505_468915059787118_214535163TSckukzps5876553a_zps7c1f8358.jpg&hash=04c852c8e74e406bc66d44ed63f2cb21cce607d8)

Nice collage. The latter two really do stick out like sore thumbs, don't they?

Thanks guys  :)  I have a few other versions I may put up later.  @ Doom, I agree.  I wonder if that'll be the final logo design for the film (I hope it is if they decide on something more radical).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 23, 2013, 02:55:32 PM
It is the final design, as far as we know.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Sep 23, 2013, 02:58:16 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 23, 2013, 02:55:32 PM
It is the final design, as far as we know.

I sure hope so.  However, black, yellow and red would still look nice.  With the correct JP font too, perhaps.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 23, 2013, 05:31:50 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Sep 23, 2013, 02:58:16 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 23, 2013, 02:55:32 PM
It is the final design, as far as we know.

I sure hope so.  However, black, yellow and red would still look nice.  With the correct JP font too, perhaps.
I wish there were just a touch of red and yellow (outlines perhaps?) on the JW logo.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 25, 2013, 09:13:03 PM
For our October Jurassic Park podcast we interviewed Vanessa Chester (Kelly) she's awesome, and I think you guys will like what she has to say about her time on set etc.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages1.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20121010011155%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2Fd%2Fd6%2FPDVD_002.jpg&hash=0ac07578ca6803d2658a53072f8c44275bd2f4c6)

I'll keep you posted guys!

@Jurassiccast
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Sep 25, 2013, 09:16:23 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 25, 2013, 09:13:03 PM
For our October Jurassic Park podcast we interviewed Vanessa Chester (Kelly) she's awesome, and I think you guys will like what she has to say about her time on set etc.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages1.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20121010011155%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2Fd%2Fd6%2FPDVD_002.jpg&hash=0ac07578ca6803d2658a53072f8c44275bd2f4c6)

I'll keep you posted guys!

@Jurassiccast

That's awesome!

It's still funny how they just decided to mix Arby and Kelly int o a black Kelly in the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 25, 2013, 10:06:44 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 25, 2013, 09:13:03 PM
For our October Jurassic Park podcast we interviewed Vanessa Chester (Kelly) she's awesome, and I think you guys will like what she has to say about her time on set etc.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages1.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20121010011155%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2Fd%2Fd6%2FPDVD_002.jpg&hash=0ac07578ca6803d2658a53072f8c44275bd2f4c6)

I'll keep you posted guys!

@Jurassiccast

Very cool! I wonder what she's up to these days. She's disappeared from the limelight since TLW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 26, 2013, 12:33:00 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 25, 2013, 10:06:44 PM
Very cool! I wonder what she's up to these days. She's disappeared from the limelight since TLW.

She's done a few things like The West Wing & How I met Your Mother but nothing like TLW I'd say. She was a delight and made me feel bad for hating on the Gymnastic scene all these years.

Spoiler
I didn't tell her I hated that scene though for obvious reasons, haha
[close]

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi42.tinypic.com%2Fa49yyx.jpg&hash=18ea04470189c99e2dd042473a9f55eb9bc7b2ea)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 26, 2013, 11:27:33 AM
Was it at least discussed as to why it was included at all? It was a very random moment in the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Sep 26, 2013, 12:59:04 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 26, 2013, 11:27:33 AM
Was it at least discussed as to why it was included at all? It was a very random moment in the film.

I could see them thinking it would be a cool way to get kids to stick with their lessons and to never give up even when they get cut from the team.

"Stick with your lessons kids. One day ... it just might save your life."

I would have gone with piano lessons ... and at the end she could have bored  the velicoraptors to death with a concerto.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 26, 2013, 03:14:54 PM
So I scored a bit of a lucky pot with my latest delivery:

http://instagram.com/p/eqGFc8lEuC/ (http://instagram.com/p/eqGFc8lEuC/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 26, 2013, 03:55:49 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 26, 2013, 03:14:54 PM
So I scored a bit of a lucky pot with my latest delivery:

http://instagram.com/p/eqGFc8lEuC/ (http://instagram.com/p/eqGFc8lEuC/)
I remember having "The Movie Storybook" back in the day!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 26, 2013, 06:15:48 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 26, 2013, 03:14:54 PM
So I scored a bit of a lucky pot with my latest delivery:

http://instagram.com/p/eqGFc8lEuC/ (http://instagram.com/p/eqGFc8lEuC/)

Sweet dude!

You planning on making a collection video anytime soon?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Sep 26, 2013, 09:03:11 PM
Jeff Sneider @TheInSneider
EXCLUSIVE: BRYCE DALLAS HOWARD is in early talks to star in Universal's JURASSIC WORLD. thewrap.com/bryce-dallas-h...

http://www.thewrap.com/bryce-dallas-howard-in-early-talks-to-star-in-universals-jurassic-world-exclusive/ (http://www.thewrap.com/bryce-dallas-howard-in-early-talks-to-star-in-universals-jurassic-world-exclusive/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Sep 26, 2013, 09:06:15 PM
Wasn't her name thrown around earlier this year? Anyway, I can get behind that choice.

I'm hearing rumors about Josh Brolin being offered a role too. :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Sep 27, 2013, 12:45:01 AM
Filming will begin this winter in Hawaii

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=59 (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=59)



(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BVIn7T-CcAEM8T8.jpg:large)

Spoiler
I made that.  Not official.  Sorry.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Sep 27, 2013, 03:44:34 AM
The logo actually looks a bit better with the jungle behind it like that. Nice work man, I thought it was official for a second.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 27, 2013, 08:27:09 AM
I love this fan made logo...

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BVJ94VzCYAA7tC_.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 27, 2013, 11:09:32 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 26, 2013, 06:15:48 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 26, 2013, 03:14:54 PM
So I scored a bit of a lucky pot with my latest delivery:

http://instagram.com/p/eqGFc8lEuC/ (http://instagram.com/p/eqGFc8lEuC/)

Sweet dude!

You planning on making a collection video anytime soon?

Yes, eventually. I was going to just take photos but that's a better idea! Also, more arrivals last night which I think you'll appreciate:

http://instagram.com/p/evLTTZlEse/ (http://instagram.com/p/evLTTZlEse/)

Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 27, 2013, 08:27:09 AM
I love this fan made logo...

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BVJ94VzCYAA7tC_.jpg

This is one is quite good. Heck, I prefer it to the official logo.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 27, 2013, 07:07:38 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 27, 2013, 11:09:32 AM
Yes, eventually. I was going to just take photos but that's a better idea! Also, more arrivals last night which I think you'll appreciate:

http://instagram.com/p/evLTTZlEse/ (http://instagram.com/p/evLTTZlEse/)

You got a player for those bad boys?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 27, 2013, 09:53:34 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 27, 2013, 11:09:32 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 26, 2013, 06:15:48 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 26, 2013, 03:14:54 PM
So I scored a bit of a lucky pot with my latest delivery:

http://instagram.com/p/eqGFc8lEuC/ (http://instagram.com/p/eqGFc8lEuC/)

Sweet dude!

You planning on making a collection video anytime soon?

Yes, eventually. I was going to just take photos but that's a better idea! Also, more arrivals last night which I think you'll appreciate:

http://instagram.com/p/evLTTZlEse/ (http://instagram.com/p/evLTTZlEse/)

Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 27, 2013, 08:27:09 AM
I love this fan made logo...

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BVJ94VzCYAA7tC_.jpg

This is one is quite good. Heck, I prefer it to the official logo.
Any DELETED scenes!?!?! :D :D :D ?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Sep 27, 2013, 10:00:26 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Sep 27, 2013, 03:44:34 AM
The logo actually looks a bit better with the jungle behind it like that. Nice work man, I thought it was official for a second.

I agree. Nice work, man. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Sep 29, 2013, 06:54:40 PM
BADAZABOOOM!!!!!!

JEFF GOLDBLUM TALKS JURASSIC WORLD

http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1198 (http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1198)

Spoiler
I think he's seceretly in it  ;D
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Sep 29, 2013, 07:31:45 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Sep 29, 2013, 06:54:40 PM
BADAZABOOOM!!!!!!

JEFF GOLDBLUM TALKS JURASSIC WORLD

http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1198 (http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1198)

Spoiler
I think he's seceretly in it  ;D
[close]

OMG PLEASE BE TRUE !!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Sep 29, 2013, 07:35:19 PM
According to chaos theory, the drop of water can go in any way.

According to nightmare asylum theory, if you throw enough money at the drop of water it will go in the direction that you want it to go in.

Hollywood, please throw all of your money at the water drop that is Jeff Goldblum.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Sep 29, 2013, 07:38:03 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Sep 29, 2013, 07:35:19 PM
According to chaos theory, the drop of water can go in any way.

According to nightmare asylum theory, if you throw enough money at the drop of water it will go in the direction that you want it to go in.

Hollywood, please throw all of your money at the water drop that is Jeff Goldblum.

ZIS!

I'm serious right now - if you have a twitter, tweet to Universal and demand them to make him an offer!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Sep 29, 2013, 08:03:04 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Sep 29, 2013, 07:38:03 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Sep 29, 2013, 07:35:19 PM
According to chaos theory, the drop of water can go in any way.

According to nightmare asylum theory, if you throw enough money at the drop of water it will go in the direction that you want it to go in.

Hollywood, please throw all of your money at the water drop that is Jeff Goldblum.

ZIS!

I'm serious right now - if you have a twitter, tweet to Universal and demand them to make him an offer!

I am going too !
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Sep 29, 2013, 09:56:40 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Sep 26, 2013, 09:03:11 PM
Jeff Sneider @TheInSneider
EXCLUSIVE: BRYCE DALLAS HOWARD is in early talks to star in Universal's JURASSIC WORLD. thewrap.com/bryce-dallas-h...

http://www.thewrap.com/bryce-dallas-howard-in-early-talks-to-star-in-universals-jurassic-world-exclusive/ (http://www.thewrap.com/bryce-dallas-howard-in-early-talks-to-star-in-universals-jurassic-world-exclusive/)
Hmmmyesplease.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Sep 29, 2013, 10:02:14 PM
Hey how about she gets a datass shot like Laura Dern in the first movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Sep 30, 2013, 02:53:58 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Sep 29, 2013, 10:02:14 PM
Hey how about she gets a datass shot like Laura Dern in the first movie.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcmi.memecdn.com%2F313%2F643313.gif&hash=e9be549e7d7c4c14f6457a915756087e539166e3)



Lol....

http://www.collegehumor.com/picture/6789353/jurassic-park-kids-scared-by-butts (http://www.collegehumor.com/picture/6789353/jurassic-park-kids-scared-by-butts)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 30, 2013, 11:24:43 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Sep 29, 2013, 07:35:19 PM
According to chaos theory, the drop of water can go in any way.

According to nightmare asylum theory, if you throw enough money at the drop of water it will go in the direction that you want it to go in.

Hollywood, please throw all of your money at the water drop that is Jeff Goldblum.

Indeed but if there's a scheduling conflict, it won't happen. Hopefully, the ID sequel doesn't get in the way.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Sep 30, 2013, 02:36:36 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 30, 2013, 11:24:43 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Sep 29, 2013, 07:35:19 PM
According to chaos theory, the drop of water can go in any way.

According to nightmare asylum theory, if you throw enough money at the drop of water it will go in the direction that you want it to go in.

Hollywood, please throw all of your money at the water drop that is Jeff Goldblum.

Indeed but if there's a scheduling conflict, it won't happen. Hopefully, the ID sequel doesn't get in the way.

I'm sure if it's just a small part, they can get him in to shoot his scenes in just like 3 or 4 days.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 02, 2013, 02:35:53 AM
Here's some wallpaper for you....

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi374.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Foo183%2FJAROSHULK28%2FJP4rharnugwthh_zps2ea9b6af.jpg&hash=55a89c68cddf3f3bf13d9c84171522c280850a5e)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 02, 2013, 11:52:24 AM
I'm re-reading Jurassic Park. I've forgotten how much of that dialogue from the book made it into the movie. I'll tell ya, I really wish the Dilo attack from the book was in the movie minute-for-minute because the book version is way more horrifying than the movie version.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Oct 02, 2013, 12:34:56 PM
You don't get nearly enough people holding their own intestines in mainstream cinema.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 02, 2013, 01:54:34 PM
The new episode of our Jurassic Park podcast "Jurassic Cast" is online!

With special guest Vanessa Lee Chester!

Listen here...

http://themoviedudes.jellycast.com/node/59 (http://themoviedudes.jellycast.com/node/59)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 02, 2013, 02:19:22 PM
Jurassic World needs to have dinos with chameleon skin...´

or imma gonna punch somebody,... :P

Carnotaurus, madafakas! It's time! :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 02, 2013, 02:48:42 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 02, 2013, 11:52:24 AM
I'm re-reading Jurassic Park. I've forgotten how much of that dialogue from the book made it into the movie. I'll tell ya, I really wish the Dilo attack from the book was in the movie minute-for-minute because the book version is way more horrifying than the movie version.

YES.

Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 02, 2013, 01:54:34 PM
The new episode of our Jurassic Park podcast "Jurassic Cast" is online!

With special guest Vanessa Lee Chester!

Listen here...

http://themoviedudes.jellycast.com/node/59 (http://themoviedudes.jellycast.com/node/59)


That was a great listen Jack  :)  I was so thrilled to hear her continued enthusiasm for the film after all these years and the amazing untold secerets in the making of the film.  Great stuff you guys are uncovering!

Do you plan on tackling an actor from one of the other films now?   Who do you have in mind right now, or is it a seceret?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 02, 2013, 03:20:11 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Oct 02, 2013, 02:48:42 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 02, 2013, 01:54:34 PM
The new episode of our Jurassic Park podcast "Jurassic Cast" is online!

With special guest Vanessa Lee Chester!

Listen here...

http://themoviedudes.jellycast.com/node/59 (http://themoviedudes.jellycast.com/node/59)


That was a great listen Jack  :)  I was so thrilled to hear her continued enthusiasm for the film after all these years and the amazing untold secerets in the making of the film.  Great stuff you guys are uncovering!

Do you plan on tackling an actor from one of the other films now?   Who do you have in mind right now, or is it a seceret?

We have another guest lined up and they're from one of the other films ;) I'm very excited but that's all I can say. Cheers for listening!

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 03, 2013, 03:33:36 AM
My new cast banner....

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BVn0UcfCYAAhzZm.jpg:large)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 03, 2013, 03:38:48 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 02, 2013, 03:20:11 PM
We have another guest lined up and they're from one of the other films ;) I'm very excited but that's all I can say. Cheers for listening!

..Wayne Knight? :laugh: Good podcast btw.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 03, 2013, 11:24:20 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Oct 03, 2013, 03:38:48 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 02, 2013, 03:20:11 PM
We have another guest lined up and they're from one of the other films ;) I'm very excited but that's all I can say. Cheers for listening!

..Wayne Knight? :laugh: Good podcast btw.

Cheers man :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Oct 03, 2013, 04:40:38 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.alternativemovieposters.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F09%2Fjurassicbg1.jpg&hash=5cde1fa05bac338a26d0f48e9717fd3281ec6527)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 03, 2013, 04:47:04 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Oct 03, 2013, 04:40:38 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.alternativemovieposters.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F09%2Fjurassicbg1.jpg&hash=5cde1fa05bac338a26d0f48e9717fd3281ec6527)

Nice!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 03, 2013, 06:03:46 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Oct 03, 2013, 04:40:38 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.alternativemovieposters.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F09%2Fjurassicbg1.jpg&hash=5cde1fa05bac338a26d0f48e9717fd3281ec6527)
Jurassic Signal.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 04, 2013, 11:18:12 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Oct 03, 2013, 04:40:38 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.alternativemovieposters.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F09%2Fjurassicbg1.jpg&hash=5cde1fa05bac338a26d0f48e9717fd3281ec6527)

Where's the rest of the T.Rex? Strange.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Oct 04, 2013, 02:05:09 PM
It's blending in with the shadows.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenodog on Oct 04, 2013, 03:31:40 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Oct 02, 2013, 02:19:22 PM
Jurassic World needs to have dinos with chameleon skin...´

or imma gonna punch somebody,... :P

Carnotaurus, madafakas! It's time! :P

Best part of the second book I.M.O.
So good a scene.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 04, 2013, 03:57:32 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Oct 04, 2013, 02:05:09 PM
It's blending in with the shadows.

Stealth dinosaur...Velociraptor, eat your heart out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 04, 2013, 04:21:11 PM
Frank Marshall has been hinting at some big news coming up soon on Twitter.  Hopefully it's Jurassic World related.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Oct 05, 2013, 12:07:03 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Oct 02, 2013, 02:19:22 PM
Jurassic World needs to have dinos with chameleon skin...´

or imma gonna punch somebody,... :P

Carnotaurus, madafakas! It's time! :P

YES. Loved that part of TLW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Oct 06, 2013, 11:22:58 PM
Introducing my Jurassic Park Fan Film.................


(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs23.postimg.org%2Fcb9qjh6d7%2FUntitled_4.jpg&hash=cc7ca283bcc5cdb2f921b54fab4dc1ea9e60d801)



And features my fav Dino aswell ;)


Can you guys guess what it is ?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Oct 06, 2013, 11:46:19 PM
Stegosaurus. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Oct 06, 2013, 11:48:34 PM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Oct 06, 2013, 11:22:58 PM
Introducing my Jurassic Park Fan Film.................


http://s23.postimg.org/cb9qjh6d7/Untitled_4.jpg



And features my fav Dino aswell ;)


Can you guys guess what it is ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OP3V7KOgG5o#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OP3V7KOgG5o#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Oct 07, 2013, 12:06:24 AM
Barney.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Oct 07, 2013, 11:11:00 AM
Wrong! ;)

Its Carnotaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BR1XER on Oct 08, 2013, 01:09:04 AM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Oct 07, 2013, 11:11:00 AM
Wrong! ;)

Its Carnotaurus.
There's never enough Carnotaurus love.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Oct 08, 2013, 01:31:15 AM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Oct 07, 2013, 11:11:00 AM
Wrong! ;)

Its Carnotaurus.

No, it's Stegosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Oct 08, 2013, 01:34:00 AM
It's definitely Stegosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Oct 08, 2013, 01:34:41 AM
no this is patrick
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Oct 08, 2013, 01:37:41 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.joesdaily.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F04%2Fsurprised-patrick-endless.gif&hash=00f53c5410f71f3cef0a1dd8045882560035df5f)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Oct 08, 2013, 01:38:23 AM
Patrick is a Stegosaurus
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Oct 08, 2013, 01:40:07 AM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Oct 08, 2013, 01:38:23 AM
Patrick is a Stegosaurus

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.izifunny.com%2Fpics%2F2013%2F20130405%2F640%2Fsurprised-patrick-meme-28-pics_10.jpg&hash=52bbd650af2a8097e2af97462effe74adff0212a)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 08, 2013, 03:54:43 AM
http://instagram.com/p/fLZ1uAFEp6/ (http://instagram.com/p/fLZ1uAFEp6/)

My latest additions!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Oct 08, 2013, 09:30:58 AM
Carnotaurus

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-mWCYzRbaCHs%2FT3R9p0CbcPI%2FAAAAAAAAICE%2FCDtOr0Z5vgY%2Fs1600%2Fcarnotaurus.png&hash=5c2ceaa5a596929682277fae1e7f499523075126)

http://skeletaldrawing.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/carnotaurus-delving-into-self-parody.html (http://skeletaldrawing.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/carnotaurus-delving-into-self-parody.html)



(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs12.postimg.org%2Fyu33s2z7x%2FUntitled_4.jpg&hash=2c71a07eedb255710736e3138ec6c6ec256a5842)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Oct 08, 2013, 03:30:18 PM
Yes, that is a very good example of a Stegosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Oct 08, 2013, 03:35:58 PM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Oct 08, 2013, 09:30:58 AM
Stegosaurus

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-mWCYzRbaCHs%2FT3R9p0CbcPI%2FAAAAAAAAICE%2FCDtOr0Z5vgY%2Fs1600%2Fcarnotaurus.png&hash=5c2ceaa5a596929682277fae1e7f499523075126)

http://skeletaldrawing.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/carnotaurus-delving-into-self-parody.html (http://skeletaldrawing.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/carnotaurus-delving-into-self-parody.html)

Love me my Stegosaurus

http://s12.postimg.org/yu33s2z7x/Untitled_4.jpg
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Oct 08, 2013, 07:03:33 PM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Oct 08, 2013, 03:30:18 PM
Yes, that is a very good example of a Stegosaurus.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fblogdailyherald.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F05%2F3879-animated_gif-chuck_norris-dodgeball-thumbs_up.gif&hash=096edc53fc8022b958b024619b55a904751f006c)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Oct 08, 2013, 08:56:19 PM
I thought his favorite dino would have been a Dilophosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Oct 08, 2013, 08:58:51 PM
Dennis Nedry is dead.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 08, 2013, 11:03:38 PM
Dennis Nedry is dead.


Spoiler
Dennis is dead.
Spoiler
Is dead. Our Dennis.
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 08, 2013, 11:07:26 PM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Oct 08, 2013, 09:30:58 AM
Carnotaurus

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-mWCYzRbaCHs%2FT3R9p0CbcPI%2FAAAAAAAAICE%2FCDtOr0Z5vgY%2Fs1600%2Fcarnotaurus.png&hash=5c2ceaa5a596929682277fae1e7f499523075126)

http://skeletaldrawing.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/carnotaurus-delving-into-self-parody.html (http://skeletaldrawing.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/carnotaurus-delving-into-self-parody.html)


Poor thing. Imagine having arms like that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Oct 08, 2013, 11:34:18 PM
Yup... You can make a case for tyrannosaurid arms playing a role in prey capture, as they're fashioned like flesh hooks and could apparently pull massive amounts of weight, but I can't see how Carnotaurus could have used their little twiglets for anything beyond stabilisation during mating.
But then at the other end of the spectrum you have those ludicrous shoulder blades...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 08, 2013, 11:38:50 PM
What good are they? I doubt Carno is going to wrestle his prey to the ground and hit it with shoulder strikes :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Oct 08, 2013, 11:44:11 PM
Exactly, but they're there for a reason. They might suggest the kind of forces involved in Carnotaurus mating, but let's not go into that...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 09, 2013, 12:53:48 AM
Talk about pushing through...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 09, 2013, 03:02:41 PM
Loll

The Carnotaur in Disney's Dinosaur was pretty bad ass though.  But waaaay too big.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 09, 2013, 04:12:50 PM
I did like that it was the antagonist of the film. It was nice to see a change from T.Rex. The size was indeed laughable. Carnotaurus was smaller than Iguanodon, the hero of the film for crying out loud in reality.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BR1XER on Oct 09, 2013, 10:06:35 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 09, 2013, 04:12:50 PM
I did like that it was the antagonist of the film. It was nice to see a change from T.Rex. The size was indeed laughable. Carnotaurus was smaller than Iguanodon, the hero of the film for crying out loud in reality.
Of course, a larger monster makes for a more convincing threat. Granted it was a kid's film, I don't think the producers worried too much about authencity.

Still don't know if Carno hunted in pairs or more, like in the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Oct 09, 2013, 11:58:00 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Oct 08, 2013, 08:56:19 PM
I thought his favorite dino would have been a Dilophosaurus.

Me too. PLOT TWIST
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 10, 2013, 01:49:58 PM
Quote from: Henrietta on Oct 09, 2013, 10:06:35 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 09, 2013, 04:12:50 PM
I did like that it was the antagonist of the film. It was nice to see a change from T.Rex. The size was indeed laughable. Carnotaurus was smaller than Iguanodon, the hero of the film for crying out loud in reality.
Of course, a larger monster makes for a more convincing threat. Granted it was a kid's film, I don't think the producers worried too much about authencity.

Still don't know if Carno hunted in pairs or more, like in the film.

Of course authenticity is low on the priority scale. The dinosaurs were speaking English, for crying out loud.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Oct 10, 2013, 03:55:33 PM
They should have been speaking Jurassican.

Or lemur.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 10, 2013, 04:20:30 PM
It's a damned Disney film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Oct 10, 2013, 04:21:23 PM
They still should have spoke lemur. :P

Man, it's been a long time since I've seen Dinosaur... pretty sure I still have the VHS somewhere in my basement.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 10, 2013, 04:24:33 PM
Was one of my favourite movies growing up.

I still remember walking out of the cinema, with my mother asking 'so who was your favourite character?' And I 'the Carnotaurus, mom. Carnotauruses are cool.'
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Oct 10, 2013, 04:26:29 PM
Heh, yep. I actually had the toy of one of them from the movie. Probably still have it somewhere... Awesome stuff.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 10, 2013, 04:28:10 PM
I did too. You pushed a button on its back and it could roar. My brother broke one of the horns off one day, so I kept calling the toy 'Broken Horn', like it was some badass name they usually give in the 'Walking with' docos.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Oct 10, 2013, 06:01:20 PM
We all had the toy.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 10, 2013, 06:09:44 PM
I didn't :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Oct 10, 2013, 06:11:40 PM
I've still never seen Dinosaur.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Oct 10, 2013, 06:11:49 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 10, 2013, 06:09:44 PM
I didn't :(
Oh. Oh Doom I'm so sorry.  :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Oct 10, 2013, 06:36:21 PM
Am I the only one who had the Mc Donald's puppet head of it?

Spoiler
I stiil have it.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Oct 10, 2013, 06:38:46 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Oct 10, 2013, 06:36:21 PM
Am I the only one who had the Mc Donald's puppet head of it?

Spoiler
I stiil have it.
[close]
Same here.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Oct 10, 2013, 07:31:56 PM
I got a lot of the old merchandise from that movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Oct 10, 2013, 07:43:23 PM
I want to make a version of Dinosaur where all of them are voiced by GTA V characters. The Carnotauruses are Franklin and Lamar.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Oct 10, 2013, 08:51:00 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Oct 10, 2013, 07:43:23 PM
I want to make a version of Dinosaur where all of them are voiced by GTA V characters. The Carnotauruses are Franklin and Lamar.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIeqhNw1LXM# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIeqhNw1LXM#)

During the scene when they first come up the sand dunes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Oct 10, 2013, 08:58:28 PM
Nnnniiiggaaa-a-a-a-aaaaa

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.media.hyves-static.net%2F1423241864%2F5%2FjtYf%2F1%2Fimg1423241864.jpeg&hash=6d1bdaad5e8f14cef54838fcf6708d7f3825b090)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Oct 10, 2013, 10:23:02 PM
Dinosaur was a lost opportunity and it looks like Walking with Dinosaurs is making the same mistakes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Oct 11, 2013, 12:52:07 AM
The rare Carnotaurus Demon toy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qa0w590vDTw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qa0w590vDTw#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 11, 2013, 12:56:44 AM
Quote from: Gilfryd on Oct 10, 2013, 10:23:02 PM
Dinosaur was a lost opportunity and it looks like Walking with Dinosaurs is making the same mistakes.

What's wrong with Dinosaur?

I thought it was a fun movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Oct 11, 2013, 02:13:26 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 11, 2013, 12:56:44 AMWhat's wrong with Dinosaur?

I thought it was a fun movie.

Surprise! It was not.

It was completely forgettable.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Oct 11, 2013, 03:08:59 AM
Quote from: Magegg on Oct 11, 2013, 02:13:26 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 11, 2013, 12:56:44 AMWhat's wrong with Dinosaur?

I thought it was a fun movie.

Surprise! It was not.

It was completely forgettable.

For you. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Oct 11, 2013, 03:16:41 AM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Oct 11, 2013, 12:52:07 AM
The rare Carnotaurus Demon toy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qa0w590vDTw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qa0w590vDTw#ws)
I always found the "capture gear" hilarious, there is no way the equipment made to "catch" dinosaurs would ever work!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 11, 2013, 11:47:28 AM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Oct 11, 2013, 12:52:07 AM
The rare Carnotaurus Demon toy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qa0w590vDTw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qa0w590vDTw#ws)

I was so giddy the day mine arrived 8)

Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 11, 2013, 12:56:44 AM
Quote from: Gilfryd on Oct 10, 2013, 10:23:02 PM
Dinosaur was a lost opportunity and it looks like Walking with Dinosaurs is making the same mistakes.

What's wrong with Dinosaur?

I thought it was a fun movie.

I found it very boring. It was pretty to look at but it tried very hard to be a modern-day Land Before Time and didn't hit the mark.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 11, 2013, 11:59:35 AM
Well if you didn't enjoy the full movie, you must be able to appreciate its teaser trailer.

I saw this before Disney's Tarzan at the cinema and couldn't stop thinking about it. It blew my 10 year old mind and still does...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCqYuBIFE5I# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCqYuBIFE5I#)


Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 11, 2013, 12:11:14 PM
Yeah but again: it was pretty visuals that grabbed audiences. Most of the major reviews said the same thing. Beyond the mind-blowing CGI, there's nothing to the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 11, 2013, 12:21:24 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 11, 2013, 12:11:14 PM
Yeah but again: it was pretty visuals that grabbed audiences. Most of the major reviews said the same thing. Beyond the mind-blowing CGI, there's nothing to the movie.

I beg to differ, for me its a great version of the we must find paradise tale. It's aged well and I'm sure kids are still enjoying it today.

Plus the score is amazing. Some of James Newton Howard's finest.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Oct 11, 2013, 03:13:07 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 11, 2013, 11:59:35 AM
Well if you didn't enjoy the full movie, you must be able to appreciate its teaser trailer.

I saw this before Disney's Tarzan at the cinema and couldn't stop thinking about it. It blew my 10 year old mind and still does...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCqYuBIFE5I# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCqYuBIFE5I#)

I wonder how this films visuals hold up in HD 1080p?

No talking dinosaurs in that teaser. History does indeed seem to repeat itself (Walking with Dinosaurs: The Movie.) I remember being able to appreciate Dinosaur for what it was; a really good looking mediocre Disney film. I wish these studios had the balls to make animated films WITHOUT dialogue. Let the animators tell the story. I don't want a bunch of celebrity voices dragging me back to present day when I'm trying to immerse myself in a film that is supposed to be set 25 million years ago.

But they make kid movies for kids and not grown ups and I think sometimes we all have to keep that perspective. (Every now and then the film makers can hit a sweet spot and make it very appealing for all ages.)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 11, 2013, 03:41:49 PM
25 million years ago?! :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Oct 11, 2013, 03:51:16 PM
My mistake. That was the time of giant bad ass mammals.

Correction: 245 to 65 million years ago. Damn what a successful species. Human beings are like an after credits sequence in the grand scheme of things.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenodog on Oct 11, 2013, 06:16:53 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Oct 11, 2013, 03:13:07 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 11, 2013, 11:59:35 AM
Well if you didn't enjoy the full movie, you must be able to appreciate its teaser trailer.

I saw this before Disney's Tarzan at the cinema and couldn't stop thinking about it. It blew my 10 year old mind and still does...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCqYuBIFE5I# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCqYuBIFE5I#)

I wonder how this films visuals hold up in HD 1080p?

No talking dinosaurs in that teaser. History does indeed seem to repeat itself (Walking with Dinosaurs: The Movie.) I remember being able to appreciate Dinosaur for what it was; a really good looking mediocre Disney film. I wish these studios had the balls to make animated films WITHOUT dialogue. Let the animators tell the story. I don't want a bunch of celebrity voices dragging me back to present day when I'm trying to immerse myself in a film that is supposed to be set 25 million years ago.

But they make kid movies for kids and not grown ups and I think sometimes we all have to keep that perspective. (Every now and then the film makers can hit a sweet spot and make it very appealing for all ages.)

As a kid I freaking loved it.
Suprisingly, and unlike a lot of other things where the vestigial child-age love has worn off with time like Harry Potter or Cauliflower cheese, I still do. The visuals as you said still hold ip very strong and the soundtrack is still one of the best overall, and most fitting, of Disney.
The biggest complaint by far is the talking and I think due to my very young age and not seeing the no-talking teaser I didn't expect anything else.

But now with new Walking with Dinosaurs, and the amazingly good quality of the old BBC series...eugh.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 12, 2013, 04:36:15 AM
Remember guys. Dinosaurs are for 12 years and under ::)

P.S. new additions for my collection, check em out!! I have real gems this time 8)

http://instagram.com/p/fVw26rFEut/ (http://instagram.com/p/fVw26rFEut/)
http://instagram.com/p/fVyO9NlEhW/ (http://instagram.com/p/fVyO9NlEhW/)
http://instagram.com/p/fVzIiaFEio/ (http://instagram.com/p/fVzIiaFEio/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenodog on Oct 12, 2013, 09:32:25 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 12, 2013, 04:36:15 AM
Remember guys. Dinosaurs are for 12 years and under ::)

Dude!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages2.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20130317181351%2Fwalkingwith%2Fimages%2Ff%2Ff2%2FWwdcruelsea.jpg&hash=18f736a243c821aaa0853cfbc4549356254ac052)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages2.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20110609022714%2Fwalkingwith%2Fimages%2F7%2F7b%2FUtahraptorshunting.png&hash=eb3075de4b6ede2c6c71794a560a2e3e90227cae)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fg-ecx.images-amazon.com%2Fimages%2FG%2F01%2Fciu%2F37%2Fb3%2F556a92c008a09b12ae02c010.L.jpg&hash=342f9e569fc58d4116a718a90669c19930f1af25)

Keep faith for more documetaries.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 12, 2013, 11:37:52 AM
Those are not even the worst 'offenders': remember when the Laellynasaura got its head ripped off by the Polar Allosaurus? Or when the Liopleurodon f**king bit in half an Ophtalmosaurus that was aborting? Shit was brutal.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 12, 2013, 11:46:32 AM
...nature is red in tooth and claw.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenodog on Oct 12, 2013, 12:02:29 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Oct 12, 2013, 11:37:52 AM
Those are not even the worst 'offenders': remember when the Laellynasaura got its head ripped off by the Polar Allosaurus? Or when the Liopleurodon f**king bit in half an Ophtalmosaurus that was aborting? Shit was brutal.

I know, but I couldn't find images of those online.  :laugh:
Also, the first episode was kinda' grim with all the cannabalism going on. Blacklabel summed it up.
...
Christ I wish there was more the 6 episodes.  :-\

Also, looking back with the equally good Walking with Beasts it suprised me there was less graphic violence then in Dinosaurs, when they were going less for 'epic grandeur' or more for "mud, blood and desperation": http://www.abc.net.au/beasts/makingof/musicsound.htm (http://www.abc.net.au/beasts/makingof/musicsound.htm)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Oct 12, 2013, 01:16:32 PM
I though Walking With Beasts seemed more brutal from what I remember.

That baby Gastornis... :-X
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 12, 2013, 01:32:29 PM
The dead Brontothere infant, the shredded turtle, the Megatherium thrashing the Smilodon away, and the Rhinoceros impaling the Neanderthal were pretty brutal, yes. But I remember nothing as graphic as in WWD.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenodog on Oct 12, 2013, 01:44:56 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Oct 12, 2013, 01:32:29 PM
The dead Brontothere infant, the shredded turtle, the Megatherium thrashing the Smilodon away, and the Rhinoceros impaling the Neanderthal were pretty brutal, yes. But I remember nothing as graphic as in WWD.

Land of Giants also has some pretty badass fights.

Walking with Monsters brought the gore scale back up with the Gorgonopsid minced the Scutosaurus' throat though. Plus the centipede impalement.

On Beasts again though, one thing I really loved was the use of faux-documentary techniques, like the use of night vision cameras, shaky cam and narration tricks like "Beast X was not seen for several weeks after this." Really immersive stuff.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Oct 12, 2013, 01:45:35 PM
WWD was f**king brutal.

Quotewhen the Laellynasaura got its head ripped off by the Polar Allosaurus

That scene always disturbed me back when I was a child.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 12, 2013, 02:19:11 PM
That it did, that it did.

I still remember watching it for the first time. Total trauma.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenodog on Oct 12, 2013, 03:02:22 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Oct 12, 2013, 02:19:11 PM
That it did, that it did.

I still remember watching it for the first time. Total trauma.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtWOBYf19gg# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtWOBYf19gg#)
1:30.
That crunch. Like twisting raw celery.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 12, 2013, 03:23:25 PM
Still gives me some shivers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Oct 12, 2013, 03:39:11 PM
I think I've only seen the censored American version, probably why I don't find it as brutal as everyone else. Need to find the uncensored one. :P

Jesus that head tear though...was not expecting something that violent... :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Oct 12, 2013, 03:44:05 PM
Which version is on Netflix?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 14, 2013, 03:00:36 PM
Quote from: Xenodog on Oct 12, 2013, 09:32:25 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 12, 2013, 04:36:15 AM
Remember guys. Dinosaurs are for 12 years and under ::)

Dude!

http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130317181351/walkingwith/images/f/f2/Wwdcruelsea.jpg

http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110609022714/walkingwith/images/7/7b/Utahraptorshunting.png

http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/ciu/37/b3/556a92c008a09b12ae02c010.L.jpg

Keep faith for more documetaries.

That's a documentary though so it's different. It's supposed to be a little violent. I'm referring to mainstream movies.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 14, 2013, 03:08:12 PM
Jurassic Park films weren't violence-free either. They were aimed at a wide audience, which included (but was not limited to) kids.

Disney's Dinosaurs had no gruesome moments but some very intense ones.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 14, 2013, 03:15:26 PM
True but just once, it'd be nice to see a dinosaur film that isn't afraid to be a little darker.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 14, 2013, 03:24:09 PM
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fen%2Fthumb%2F3%2F34%2FCarnosaurPoster.jpg%2F220px-CarnosaurPoster.jpg&hash=9a94ae156e0c94cb2695f6729772f2ea08a52a46)
Spoiler
lol
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 14, 2013, 03:29:16 PM
A serious film would be better :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 14, 2013, 03:46:59 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 14, 2013, 03:29:16 PM
A serious film would be better :P

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_lzgcxnNjUg1rpdvglo1_500.gif&hash=41cb269e4a385e8f05dd9ceb18c518b2b8917c54)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 14, 2013, 03:56:42 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 14, 2013, 03:46:59 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 14, 2013, 03:29:16 PM
A serious film would be better :P

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_lzgcxnNjUg1rpdvglo1_500.gif&hash=41cb269e4a385e8f05dd9ceb18c518b2b8917c54)
[close]

Yea, somehow, Spielberg always had the craft to show you something mutely gruesome, but it's still a mind-f**ker.

Man, I feel bad for Eddie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 14, 2013, 04:01:19 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 14, 2013, 03:46:59 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 14, 2013, 03:29:16 PM
A serious film would be better :P

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_lzgcxnNjUg1rpdvglo1_500.gif&hash=41cb269e4a385e8f05dd9ceb18c518b2b8917c54)
[close]

I feel like those moments are few and far between. Not to mention, a human being split in half like that would result in a whack ton of blood spraying out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 14, 2013, 04:51:17 PM
So I hear little Ty Simpkins from Iron Man 3 may have landed a lead role in Jurassic World.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.aceshowbiz.com%2Fimages%2Fwennpic%2Fty-simpkins-premiere-iron-man-3-01.jpg&hash=c4f2bf9d3a2dbba2c0eb6a931219eb979cde8015)

He was great in Iron Man.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Oct 14, 2013, 04:54:06 PM
He was pretty good in Insidious when he wasn't unconscious, too :D

Kid's not a bad actor at all. I'm glad to see him getting more roles.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Oct 14, 2013, 05:21:59 PM
I'm fine with Simpkins, as long as he's not being a pussy about it. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dark Bladed Hunter on Oct 14, 2013, 05:54:50 PM
I hope that they would bring back BioSyn but if they don't, still be looking forward to it
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Oct 14, 2013, 05:59:06 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Oct 14, 2013, 03:24:09 PM
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fen%2Fthumb%2F3%2F34%2FCarnosaurPoster.jpg%2F220px-CarnosaurPoster.jpg&hash=9a94ae156e0c94cb2695f6729772f2ea08a52a46)
Spoiler
lol
[close]
[close]
Beat me to the punch  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Oct 14, 2013, 06:01:07 PM
Quote from: Dark Bladed Hunter on Oct 14, 2013, 05:54:50 PM
I hope that they would bring back BioSyn

Hear, hear.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Oct 14, 2013, 06:29:36 PM
Jake Johnson is in the mix too: http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=88508 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=88508)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Oct 14, 2013, 09:49:11 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 14, 2013, 03:29:16 PM
A serious film would be better :P

Somebody needs to make Dino Crisis into a movie...or at least a movie with as much gore as Dino Crisis. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Oct 14, 2013, 09:50:59 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Oct 14, 2013, 09:49:11 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 14, 2013, 03:29:16 PM
A serious film would be better :P

Somebody needs to make Dino Crisis into a movie...or at least a movie with as much gore as Dino Crisis. :P

And set it in space.  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ShadowPred on Oct 14, 2013, 09:53:02 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Oct 14, 2013, 06:29:36 PM
Jake Johnson is in the mix too: http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=88508 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=88508)


f**king ace.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Oct 14, 2013, 10:14:12 PM
Quote from: ShadowPred on Oct 14, 2013, 09:53:02 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Oct 14, 2013, 06:29:36 PM
Jake Johnson is in the mix too: http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=88508 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=88508)


f**king ace.

Might as well bring in the "New Girl" as well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Oct 14, 2013, 10:20:49 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Oct 14, 2013, 06:29:36 PM
Jake Johnson is in the mix too: http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=88508 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=88508)
Well, there's my ticket.

Movie could end up being complete shit and he'd still be great (past experience with Trevorrow).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 15, 2013, 02:35:58 AM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Oct 14, 2013, 09:49:11 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 14, 2013, 03:29:16 PM
A serious film would be better :P

Somebody needs to make Dino Crisis into a movie...or at least a movie with as much gore as Dino Crisis. :P

That'd be nice for sure :-[

Quote from: KiramidHead on Oct 14, 2013, 09:50:59 PM
And set it in space.  8)

GO AWAY.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 15, 2013, 02:40:28 AM
Any chance for that Ray Arnold return with a makeshift prosthetic arm made from those egg turners?  If I recall correctly, that was Sweep's brilliant idea.

Btw, I remember reading an unintentionally hilarious fan script that described what occured when Ray encountered the raptor.  It went something a long the lines of grabbing his own severed arm and using it to beat the shit out of the raptor in a last act of defense.

"MOTHAf**kIN RAPTAS!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Oct 15, 2013, 03:15:44 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Oct 14, 2013, 09:50:59 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Oct 14, 2013, 09:49:11 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 14, 2013, 03:29:16 PM
A serious film would be better :P

Somebody needs to make Dino Crisis into a movie...or at least a movie with as much gore as Dino Crisis. :P

And set it in space.  8)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.tumblr.com%2F6c09e6532826ec3d74c3f688747c3cae%2Fclb9dm5%2FKbqmttdle%2Ftumblr_static_heavy-breathing-cat.jpg&hash=927d6204af5243f850765ac0c6b9c16fee8d24e1)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Oct 15, 2013, 03:50:13 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 15, 2013, 02:35:58 AM
GO AWAY.

Quote from: King Rathalos on Oct 15, 2013, 03:15:44 AM
http://static.tumblr.com/6c09e6532826ec3d74c3f688747c3cae/clb9dm5/Kbqmttdle/tumblr_static_heavy-breathing-cat.jpg

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fts1.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DH.4907847396229236%26amp%3Bpid%3D1.7&hash=42d536b224e7a8d5cbe3784bf51d440da743b01c)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Oct 15, 2013, 11:11:24 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Oct 14, 2013, 10:20:49 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Oct 14, 2013, 06:29:36 PM
Jake Johnson is in the mix too: http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=88508 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=88508)
Well, there's my ticket.

Movie could end up being complete shit and he'd still be great (past experience with Trevorrow).

He was so f**king awesome in Safety Not Guaranteed, f**k.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 15, 2013, 11:13:48 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Oct 15, 2013, 03:50:13 AM
http://ts1.mm.bing.net/th?id=H.4907847396229236&pid=1.7

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F31.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_ly640mDAGC1qg78udo1_500.gif&hash=cc71b2fcab6e8d6d244366fcfdf782c5759b39ac)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Oct 15, 2013, 06:47:09 PM
Borys Kit @Borys_Kit
Breaking: Nick Robinson, one of the breakout stars of The Kings of Summer, is landing a leading role in JURASSIC WORLD.

http://variety.com/2013/film/news/kings-of-summer-nick-robinson-eyes-role-in-jurassic-world-1200727979/ (http://variety.com/2013/film/news/kings-of-summer-nick-robinson-eyes-role-in-jurassic-world-1200727979/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Oct 15, 2013, 08:11:40 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 15, 2013, 11:13:48 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Oct 15, 2013, 03:50:13 AM
http://ts1.mm.bing.net/th?id=H.4907847396229236&pid=1.7

http://31.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ly640mDAGC1qg78udo1_500.gif
hey that's me!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 15, 2013, 08:36:06 PM
The Dilophosaurus also had a mechanism that made its tongue twist inside its mouth. Too bad you almost don't see that detail in the movie.

I loved the realism in the breathing function of the animatronic, too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Oct 15, 2013, 08:43:01 PM
I'm not sure the animatronics in that film have ever been bettered. I know the subsequent entries in the series used more sophisticated robotics, but there's so much character and life in JP's critters.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 15, 2013, 09:02:22 PM
Sorry for the plug guys :-*

For iOS users the wonderful people at http://www.drwho-online.co.uk/ (http://www.drwho-online.co.uk/) have team up with me and BamSam to create an ultimate Jurassic Park app called "Jurappic Park" Yeah I know they came up with the name haha

(https://si0.twimg.com/profile_images/378800000600490327/da0b4d6b243d717737a4387bcb519b01.png)

It's perfect for news updates and info on everything JP also it contains our podcasts which have our interviews with the cast and crew of the films ;)

More info here peeps...

@JurassicCast
@JurappicPark

www.jpforever.com (http://www.jpforever.com)

ALSO JURASSIC TIME IS RELEASED NOW!

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BWcgDlCIUAIOD5f.jpg:large)

clicky clicky...

http://jurassictime.trescom.org/annotated.html (http://jurassictime.trescom.org/annotated.html)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Oct 15, 2013, 09:13:08 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Oct 15, 2013, 08:36:06 PM
The Dilophosaurus also had a mechanism that made its tongue twist inside its mouth. Too bad you almost don't see that detail in the movie.

I loved the realism in the breathing function of the animatronic, too.

This is a perfect video...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3IJQjhdLbbo#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3IJQjhdLbbo#ws)

Always preferred Animatronics to CGI tbh feels more real like the Xeno off A L I E N.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 16, 2013, 01:09:41 AM
I would love to know why they included that frill at all. It was such a random addition.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Oct 16, 2013, 01:20:25 AM
Wanted too add something different for the movie I guess.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 16, 2013, 01:33:40 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 16, 2013, 01:09:41 AM
I would love to know why they included that frill at all. It was such a random addition.

Much like the Carnotaurus changing colour in the second novel they added the frill and the venom to give it something that resembles evolutionary defense and hunting traits of animals we see today. Making the dinosaurs in JP seem more real.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-VgFTsFCYgqY%2FTuBV9S3OcNI%2FAAAAAAAADfg%2Fb24WZ01dX4U%2Fs320%2FFrilled-Lizard-04.jpg&hash=fef4cdb01669f10e158f7ff3dbe9aa34e87534e8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 16, 2013, 02:25:01 AM
Except the real Dilophosaurus didn't actually sport a frill so that makes it less real in the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 16, 2013, 07:50:59 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 16, 2013, 02:25:01 AM
Except the real Dilophosaurus didn't actually sport a frill so that makes it less real in the film.

I agree, but the frill being a fictional add on didn't make the character any less real. I just imagine the frill not being able to survive fossilisation, or that in the JP universe they hadn't discovered a Dilophosaurus with one until Hammond's scientists cloned one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Oct 16, 2013, 09:20:13 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 16, 2013, 01:33:40 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 16, 2013, 01:09:41 AM
I would love to know why they included that frill at all. It was such a random addition.

Much like the Carnotaurus changing colour in the second novel they added the frill and the venom to give it something that resembles evolutionary defense and hunting traits of animals we see today. Making the dinosaurs in JP seem more real.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-VgFTsFCYgqY/TuBV9S3OcNI/AAAAAAAADfg/b24WZ01dX4U/s320/Frilled-Lizard-04.jpg

Thought it was true that it could change its color (Camouflage) ?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on Oct 16, 2013, 10:14:46 AM
We have no way of knowing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 16, 2013, 11:37:52 AM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8viBPFLcdnM# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8viBPFLcdnM#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 16, 2013, 12:29:54 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 16, 2013, 07:50:59 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 16, 2013, 02:25:01 AM
Except the real Dilophosaurus didn't actually sport a frill so that makes it less real in the film.

I agree, but the frill being a fictional add on didn't make the character any less real. I just imagine the frill not being able to survive fossilisation, or that in the JP universe they hadn't discovered a Dilophosaurus with one until Hammond's scientists cloned one.

There'd be some evidence of one. Why wouldn't it fossilize?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 16, 2013, 03:42:05 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 16, 2013, 12:29:54 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 16, 2013, 07:50:59 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 16, 2013, 02:25:01 AM
Except the real Dilophosaurus didn't actually sport a frill so that makes it less real in the film.

I agree, but the frill being a fictional add on didn't make the character any less real. I just imagine the frill not being able to survive fossilisation, or that in the JP universe they hadn't discovered a Dilophosaurus with one until Hammond's scientists cloned one.

There'd be some evidence of one. Why wouldn't it fossilize?

Maybe it could but they hadn't discovered a perfect fossil that showed a frill.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 16, 2013, 03:45:54 PM
And the fossils found have shown no evidence of attachments where a frill would be. Considering a T.Rex leg has been discovered with soft tissue, as well as fossilized organs in other dinosaur specimens, I'm not willing to acknowledge existence of a frill on Dilophosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 16, 2013, 03:51:29 PM
But you're applying what I'm saying to real life, I'm saying within the JP universe. Heck in the JP universe they could have known about the frill, they only mention the discovery of its venom spitting abilities.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Oct 16, 2013, 04:23:42 PM
[quote a
uthor=Alien³ link=topic=990.msg1795377#msg1795377 date=1381938689]
But you're applying what I'm saying to real life, I'm saying within the JP universe. Heck in the JP universe they could have known about the frill, they only mention the discovery of its venom spitting abilities.
[/quote]

So the Dilo could actually spit venom?


Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 16, 2013, 04:26:52 PM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Oct 16, 2013, 04:23:42 PM
So the Dilo could actually spit venom?

In the fictional universe of Jurassic Park, yes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 16, 2013, 06:32:39 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Oct 16, 2013, 11:37:52 AM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8viBPFLcdnM# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8viBPFLcdnM#)

Lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Oct 17, 2013, 12:05:35 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 15, 2013, 09:02:22 PM
Sorry for the plug guys :-*

For iOS users the wonderful people at http://www.drwho-online.co.uk/ (http://www.drwho-online.co.uk/) have team up with me and BamSam to create an ultimate Jurassic Park app called "Jurappic Park" Yeah I know they came up with the name haha

https://si0.twimg.com/profile_images/378800000600490327/da0b4d6b243d717737a4387bcb519b01.png

It's perfect for news updates and info on everything JP also it contains our podcasts which have our interviews with the cast and crew of the films ;)

More info here peeps...

@JurassicCast
@JurappicPark

www.jpforever.com (http://www.jpforever.com)

ALSO JURASSIC TIME IS RELEASED NOW!

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BWcgDlCIUAIOD5f.jpg:large)

clicky clicky...

http://jurassictime.trescom.org/annotated.html (http://jurassictime.trescom.org/annotated.html)

Too bad they used the raptor from the cover of Turok 2.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 17, 2013, 12:24:00 PM
Some new arrivals last night: a beautiful JP coffee mug and the super-rare Series 2 Baryonyx.

http://instagram.com/p/fjE_GJlEuI/ (http://instagram.com/p/fjE_GJlEuI/)
http://instagram.com/p/fjFW5rFEum/ (http://instagram.com/p/fjFW5rFEum/)
http://instagram.com/p/fjF77TFEvg/ (http://instagram.com/p/fjF77TFEvg/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 17, 2013, 02:44:03 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 17, 2013, 12:24:00 PM
http://instagram.com/p/fjF77TFEvg/ (http://instagram.com/p/fjF77TFEvg/)

Ultra Jel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenodog on Oct 17, 2013, 04:21:42 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 17, 2013, 12:24:00 PM
Some new arrivals last night: a beautiful JP coffee mug and the super-rare Series 2 Baryonyx.

http://instagram.com/p/fjE_GJlEuI/ (http://instagram.com/p/fjE_GJlEuI/)
http://instagram.com/p/fjFW5rFEum/ (http://instagram.com/p/fjFW5rFEum/)
http://instagram.com/p/fjF77TFEvg/ (http://instagram.com/p/fjF77TFEvg/)

Nice man!
In my youth I rabidly collected the toyline, got some real goodies in the attic back at home. Sadly most taken out of the packaging but stilll.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 17, 2013, 04:28:05 PM
What shape are they in?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenodog on Oct 17, 2013, 04:31:47 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 17, 2013, 04:28:05 PM
What shape are they in?

Most are pretty good - they'll likely be a bit dust-laden by now but should mostly be fine.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 17, 2013, 04:44:13 PM
Pics or it didn't happen!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Oct 17, 2013, 05:04:34 PM
Every time I see DOOMRULZ as the latest post, I almost expect to see an instagram pic of something Jurassicly great :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenodog on Oct 17, 2013, 05:21:56 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 17, 2013, 04:44:13 PM
Pics or it didn't happen!

Hah.  :laugh:
When I'm back for Christmas at my house I'll take a look!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Oct 18, 2013, 07:15:58 PM
Looks like more and more concrete that Josh Brolin will get a role:

http://www.thewrap.com/josh-brolin-eyed-lead-role-universals-jurassic-world/ (http://www.thewrap.com/josh-brolin-eyed-lead-role-universals-jurassic-world/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: botmetro on Oct 18, 2013, 07:25:16 PM
Any news on some of the original cast returning?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Oct 18, 2013, 07:28:24 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Oct 18, 2013, 07:15:58 PM
Looks like more and more concrete that Josh Brolin will get a role:

http://www.thewrap.com/josh-brolin-eyed-lead-role-universals-jurassic-world/ (http://www.thewrap.com/josh-brolin-eyed-lead-role-universals-jurassic-world/)

I'll buy 10 tickets, thanks.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Oct 18, 2013, 07:43:15 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Oct 18, 2013, 07:15:58 PM
Looks like more and more concrete that Josh Brolin will get a role:

http://www.thewrap.com/josh-brolin-eyed-lead-role-universals-jurassic-world/ (http://www.thewrap.com/josh-brolin-eyed-lead-role-universals-jurassic-world/)
Sweet. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 18, 2013, 10:49:07 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Oct 17, 2013, 05:04:34 PM
Every time I see DOOMRULZ as the latest post, I almost expect to see an instagram pic of something Jurassicly great :P

Did you see my latest ones?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Oct 18, 2013, 11:05:19 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 18, 2013, 10:49:07 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Oct 17, 2013, 05:04:34 PM
Every time I see DOOMRULZ as the latest post, I almost expect to see an instagram pic of something Jurassicly great :P

Did you see my latest ones?



Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 17, 2013, 12:24:00 PM
Some new arrivals last night: a beautiful JP coffee mug and the super-rare Series 2 Baryonyx.

http://instagram.com/p/fjE_GJlEuI/ (http://instagram.com/p/fjE_GJlEuI/)
http://instagram.com/p/fjFW5rFEum/ (http://instagram.com/p/fjFW5rFEum/)
http://instagram.com/p/fjF77TFEvg/ (http://instagram.com/p/fjF77TFEvg/)
My goodness, I want your job to make all this money to spend on ultra-rare MOC goodies!
Wait, if I have to shave or cut my hair then forget it :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 19, 2013, 03:33:25 AM
Heh, I'm not rich dude. I'm just super selective about what I spend my money on.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Oct 19, 2013, 04:21:42 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 19, 2013, 03:33:25 AM
Heh, I'm not rich dude. I'm just super selective about what I spend my money on.
I know what you mean man, I was just pulling your leg...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fpixelluloid.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F04%2Fmmjp-goat1.jpg&hash=f886846dc76a93984f7b2014d2b5412fb1840fbc)
;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Oct 19, 2013, 12:33:15 PM
Quote from: botmetro on Oct 18, 2013, 07:25:16 PM
Any news on some of the original cast returning?

Why would you want that, granted they were fantastic in the first film but very dissapointing in the sequels. Joseph Mazzello I'd like to see though...but a fresh cast is much better. So happy with the cast so far.

Heard Idris Elba (Thor Prometheus) will star in it also...

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 19, 2013, 01:27:21 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on Oct 19, 2013, 12:33:15 PM
Why would you want that,
wow
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Oct 19, 2013, 01:30:46 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on Oct 19, 2013, 12:33:15 PM
Heard Idris Elba (Thor Prometheus Pacific Rim ) will star in it also...

Maybe he will sacrifice himself in a huge explosion to pave the way for the good guys to come out on top.  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Oct 19, 2013, 01:53:03 PM
I think one of the coolest things about hearing that Idris Elba is going to be in a movie is waiting to find out what accent he's going to have 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Oct 19, 2013, 03:07:55 PM
I want to hear him try out the Copley accent from Elysium at some point.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 19, 2013, 03:34:37 PM
I want him to play "Black guy who actually survives a Jurassic Park film".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 19, 2013, 03:55:19 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Oct 19, 2013, 01:30:46 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on Oct 19, 2013, 12:33:15 PM
Heard Idris Elba (Thor Prometheus Pacific Rim ) will star in it also...

Maybe he will sacrifice himself in a huge explosion to pave the way for the good guys to come out on top.  :P

Wow, he does do that a lot, doesn't he? (Even in Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance)

I personally hope has has a seasoned southern accent.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Oct 19, 2013, 04:09:37 PM
So you guys think Jurassic World will actually going back to the park or will be another place ?

Or they calling it World because its basically like a Dinosaur world back on Isla Nublar islands ?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Oct 19, 2013, 04:17:01 PM
I'm pretty sure we're going back to Nublar and (probably) gonna see a park open to the public.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Oct 19, 2013, 04:44:01 PM
Park open too the public ? did that ever get finished ?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Oct 19, 2013, 04:57:05 PM
Jurassic World because The Lost Park sounds like a movie about a nomadic ghost carnival that steals the souls of children.

Seriously ... Jurassic World makes me think the Dinosaurs are on the loose and are a part of everyday life now. Riding your bike down the street. Suddenly, Raptors! Must peddle faster!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Oct 19, 2013, 07:16:59 PM
They dropped that idea before Trevorrow stepped in.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Oct 19, 2013, 07:22:06 PM
Jurassic World is the name of the new park, with lots of tourists on JW planes coming and going til something goes very wrong

I think
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: p1nk81cd on Oct 19, 2013, 07:26:41 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Oct 19, 2013, 04:57:05 PM
Seriously ... Jurassic World makes me think the Dinosaurs are on the loose and are a part of everyday life now. Riding your bike down the street. Suddenly, Raptors! Must peddle faster!


Can't go for a pee in the bushes: because is that a bush, or is it Carnotaurus eyeballing her next meal?  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Oct 19, 2013, 09:14:30 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on Oct 19, 2013, 07:22:06 PM
Jurassic World is the name of the new park, with lots of tourists on JW planes coming and going til something goes very wrong

I think

Where did you hear this ?

If true then it might not even be set on Nublar after all and seems too be not even linked for JP 1,2,3

Who knows...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Oct 19, 2013, 09:43:49 PM
I don't know if it's true but I heard that it does take place on Isla Nublar (it's possible that the other 4 islands close to it are used for attractions also but not in the film itself) but it has been changed a lot. There is even a city-like environment in there with high tech transportation, small skyscrapers, other environments include a big 'beach' resort and a lagoon
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Oct 19, 2013, 10:34:22 PM
Nice.

Its really good too hear there is more to it than the park its self.

Interesting stuff.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Oct 20, 2013, 12:11:43 AM
Quote from: Xan21 on Oct 19, 2013, 09:43:49 PM
I don't know if it's true but I heard that it does take place on Isla Nublar (it's possible that the other 4 islands close to it are used for attractions also but not in the film itself) but it has been changed a lot. There is even a city-like environment in there with high tech transportation, small skyscrapers, other environments include a big 'beach' resort and a lagoon

That would actually be pretty cool and keep things fresh without deviating too much from the roots.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shinawi on Oct 20, 2013, 12:42:47 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on Oct 19, 2013, 09:43:49 PM
There is even a city-like environment in there with high tech transportation, small skyscrapers, other environments include a big 'beach' resort and a lagoon
I expect a lot of young people with swimming suits on like in Piranha 3D.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Oct 20, 2013, 01:21:32 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on Oct 19, 2013, 09:43:49 PM
I don't know if it's true but I heard that it does take place on Isla Nublar (it's possible that the other 4 islands close to it are used for attractions also but not in the film itself) but it has been changed a lot. There is even a city-like environment in there with high tech transportation, small skyscrapers, other environments include a big 'beach' resort and a lagoon

That sounds a lot like Dino Crisis 2, minus the time travelling.

Spoiler
This is a good great thing.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Oct 20, 2013, 06:28:00 PM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Oct 19, 2013, 09:14:30 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on Oct 19, 2013, 07:22:06 PM
Jurassic World is the name of the new park, with lots of tourists on JW planes coming and going til something goes very wrong

I think

Where did you hear this ?

If true then it might not even be set on Nublar after all and seems too be not even linked for JP 1,2,3

Who knows...

All these news broke a dozen pages back. The park being open to the public thing seems concrete. Trevorrow mentioned it, I believe.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 20, 2013, 07:28:05 PM
Nah... Trevorrow didnt really confirm the park being opened... he mentioned on twitter that we would return to Isla Nublar.. and that there would be a new badass dinosaur... but that's pretty much it so far.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Oct 20, 2013, 07:42:43 PM
I know what I want.

Spoiler
Jurassic Park: Deadly Prey Edition
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Oct 20, 2013, 08:44:42 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Oct 20, 2013, 07:28:05 PM
Nah... Trevorrow didnt really confirm the park being opened... he mentioned on twitter that we would return to Isla Nublar.. and that there would be a new badass dinosaur... but that's pretty much it so far.

Damn.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 20, 2013, 09:55:12 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Oct 20, 2013, 07:42:43 PM
I know what I want.

Spoiler
Jurassic Park: Deadly Prey Edition
[close]

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg22.imageshack.us%2Fimg22%2F1128%2F6xju.jpg&hash=d460543cd7d6de1a8c4c42cea3e4ca1abb1792d5)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 21, 2013, 09:09:38 AM
Latest rumour is this guy is being cast...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-3zlbHNP0cRg%2FT-XVvpxTbGI%2FAAAAAAAAA8Q%2FvPLRS33cYck%2Fs400%2FIdris%252BElba%252Bas%252BJanek%252Bin%252BPrometheus.%252BTM%252526Copyright%252B2012.%252B20th%252BCentury%252BFox%25252C%252BBrnadywine%252BProductions%25252C%252BDune%252BEnetertainment%25252C%252BScott%252BFree%252BProductions.png&hash=97fab1b2c4b8bf31be104f36174b7e56c2b6a201)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 21, 2013, 01:39:36 PM
Any mentioning of what sort of role he would play?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Oct 21, 2013, 04:18:31 PM
Seeing as he's Idris Elba, I'd assume the most badass role in the film. And he'll have an accent :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Oct 21, 2013, 04:25:02 PM
He needs to be the next hunter with an awesome hat.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Oct 21, 2013, 04:39:04 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Oct 21, 2013, 04:25:02 PM
He needs to be the next hunter with an awesome hat.

Preferably this hat:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Foyster.ignimgs.com%2Fmediawiki%2Fapis.ign.com%2Fmarvel-studios-cinematic-universe%2F6%2F63%2FHeimdall4.jpg&hash=d36585be4f3dcf1fb9b6776d04cb04a5987e99bc)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Oct 21, 2013, 07:38:17 PM
His last scene will involve him crashing a large machine into a dinosaur and blowing up with said machine.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Oct 21, 2013, 07:59:20 PM
He'll cancel the dinopocalypse. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Oct 21, 2013, 09:47:05 PM
He's blown up a space ship against another space ship, he's blown up a mech in an attempt to destroy a giant monster, if the rumors of the movie having a water theme are true, then it's only natural he drives a submersible into a mosasaur's mouth to blow it up. 8)

Spoiler
You know you want something like this to happen, don't deny it.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Oct 21, 2013, 09:55:17 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Oct 20, 2013, 09:55:12 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Oct 20, 2013, 07:42:43 PM
I know what I want.

Spoiler
Jurassic Park: Deadly Prey Edition
[close]

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg22.imageshack.us%2Fimg22%2F1128%2F6xju.jpg&hash=d460543cd7d6de1a8c4c42cea3e4ca1abb1792d5)
[close]
:laugh: :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Oct 21, 2013, 10:23:53 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Oct 21, 2013, 04:18:31 PM
Seeing as he's Idris Elba, I'd assume the most badass role in the film. And he'll have an accent :D

Just to throw everyone for a loop, I want him to be a nerdy and cowardly geneticist or computer programmer.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Oct 21, 2013, 10:28:02 PM
who has sex with Bryce Dallas Howard.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Oct 21, 2013, 10:30:02 PM
this is now heading in the right direction
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Oct 21, 2013, 11:49:11 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Oct 21, 2013, 10:28:02 PM
who has sex with Bryce Dallas Howard.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FU4Qzjxsmyw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FU4Qzjxsmyw#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Oct 22, 2013, 12:27:48 AM
I didn't think it was possible to get more hyped up for this movie.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTIyJ_Vf7Ro#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTIyJ_Vf7Ro#ws)

The crash will be the explosion of awesome if this turns out to be true.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 22, 2013, 12:59:03 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Oct 21, 2013, 10:23:53 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Oct 21, 2013, 04:18:31 PM
Seeing as he's Idris Elba, I'd assume the most badass role in the film. And he'll have an accent :D

Just to throw everyone for a loop, I want him to be a nerdy and cowardly geneticist or computer programmer.

That'd actually be perfect.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Oct 22, 2013, 01:34:35 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Oct 21, 2013, 10:23:53 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Oct 21, 2013, 04:18:31 PM
Seeing as he's Idris Elba, I'd assume the most badass role in the film. And he'll have an accent :D

Just to throw everyone for a loop, I want him to be a nerdy and cowardly geneticist or computer programmer.

'slong as he has a new accent it'll all be good 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 22, 2013, 07:49:46 AM
So now I've heard he's not in it.

Spoiler
:(
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 22, 2013, 03:32:49 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 22, 2013, 07:49:46 AM
So now I've heard he's not in it.

Spoiler
:(
[close]

His publicist could be trying to cover up the news maybe?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenodog on Oct 22, 2013, 04:24:18 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Oct 21, 2013, 10:23:53 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Oct 21, 2013, 04:18:31 PM
Seeing as he's Idris Elba, I'd assume the most badass role in the film. And he'll have an accent :D

Just to throw everyone for a loop, I want him to be a nerdy and cowardly geneticist or computer programmer.

A black, nerdy computer programmer in Jurassic park...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F076dd0a50e0c1255009e-bd4b8aabaca29897bc751dfaf75b290c.r40.cf1.rackcdn.com%2Fimages%2Ffiles%2F000%2F040%2F017%2Foriginal%2Foriginal.0&hash=45ced3c2adb0938e1c9f27020141eb818b5fe4a8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 22, 2013, 05:22:38 PM
Quote from: Xenodog on Oct 22, 2013, 04:24:18 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Oct 21, 2013, 10:23:53 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Oct 21, 2013, 04:18:31 PM
Seeing as he's Idris Elba, I'd assume the most badass role in the film. And he'll have an accent :D

Just to throw everyone for a loop, I want him to be a nerdy and cowardly geneticist or computer programmer.

A black, nerdy computer programmer in Jurassic park...

http://076dd0a50e0c1255009e-bd4b8aabaca29897bc751dfaf75b290c.r40.cf1.rackcdn.com/images/files/000/040/017/original/original.0

In which case he'll say, "Grab ahold of your buttocks" like a proper Englishman.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Oct 23, 2013, 12:09:48 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 22, 2013, 07:49:46 AM
So now I've heard he's not in it.

Spoiler
:(
[close]

I won't lose hope  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Oct 23, 2013, 12:37:02 AM
They should make this a comedy and cast Jack Black to play all of the characters, including a T-Rex voice over.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Oct 23, 2013, 12:38:42 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Oct 23, 2013, 12:37:02 AM
They should make this a comedy and cast Jack Black to play all of the characters, including a T-Rex voice over.

They should have Jack Black voice you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TheLoneSpoon on Oct 23, 2013, 12:38:56 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Oct 23, 2013, 12:37:02 AM
They should make this a comedy and cast Jack Black to play all of the characters, including a T-Rex voice over.

Yes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Oct 23, 2013, 12:40:30 AM
Doing so would even make the Jurassic World title seem less retarded.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TheLoneSpoon on Oct 23, 2013, 12:41:29 AM
The idea of Jack Black voicing a T-Rex just makes me feel good inside.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Oct 23, 2013, 12:45:41 AM
It should make the entire JP fan base feel good inside. Regarding content, it'd be a step up from The Lost World, and a mile above JP3.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Oct 23, 2013, 01:17:28 AM
And his best friend, a guitar-playing Velociraptor voiced by Kyle Gass.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Oct 23, 2013, 01:18:23 AM
Would that make the Spinosaurus Beelzeboss, then?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TheLoneSpoon on Oct 23, 2013, 01:26:17 AM
yes to all of this


Let's just remake The Pick of Destiny with dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Oct 23, 2013, 01:34:30 AM
Best idea I've heard all year
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Oct 23, 2013, 01:52:46 AM
BREAKING:

FIRST STILL RELEASED JACK BLACK'S  UPCOMING THE PICK OF DESTINY REMAKE  JURASSIC WORLD:


(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fa2.ec-images.myspacecdn.com%2Fprofile01%2F139%2F5c815b06a15d46ca95cdf6109cbcd721%2Fp.jpg&hash=4965e67bcee4ecf23e839ae19d031bb4d21be0d5)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TheLoneSpoon on Oct 23, 2013, 02:01:34 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Oct 23, 2013, 01:52:46 AM
BREAKING:

FIRST STILL RELEASED JACK BLACK'S  UPCOMING THE PICK OF DESTINY REMAKE  JURASSIC WORLD:


(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fa2.ec-images.myspacecdn.com%2Fprofile01%2F139%2F5c815b06a15d46ca95cdf6109cbcd721%2Fp.jpg&hash=4965e67bcee4ecf23e839ae19d031bb4d21be0d5)


<3
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Oct 23, 2013, 02:41:09 AM
I lub you guys.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 23, 2013, 11:51:10 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 22, 2013, 07:49:46 AM
So now I've heard he's not in it.

Spoiler
:(
[close]

What was the source?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 24, 2013, 01:30:44 AM
(https://scontent-b-lga.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/1385985_534902143256128_74399118_n.jpg)

Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
I wish it was official.
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Oct 24, 2013, 03:14:20 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Oct 24, 2013, 01:30:44 AM
(https://scontent-b-lga.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/1385985_534902143256128_74399118_n.jpg)

Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
I wish it was official.
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]

Jurassic Moon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Oct 24, 2013, 04:34:11 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Oct 24, 2013, 03:14:20 PM
Jurassic Moon.

Starring Sam Rockwell.

Fund it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 24, 2013, 05:18:15 PM
Childhood scar....

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.abload.de%2Fimg%2Fjp3eat61d5y.gif&hash=95707bb06c3e7fd4e5487476d14daaf407d958e8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 25, 2013, 12:29:19 PM
I have to say this. In that shot, since you slowed it down, the Spinosaurus looks really, really bad. It's dull, grey, and not even the slightest bit real.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 25, 2013, 01:41:42 PM
Really? Looks great to me.

And yes that scene was quite scary first time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Oct 25, 2013, 01:45:39 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Oct 25, 2013, 01:41:42 PM
Really? Looks great to me.

Same. The CG actually looks better than the animatronic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Oct 25, 2013, 02:32:38 PM
ILM did the CGI Dinosaurs for Jurassic Park 3 right? I always assumed they did. But I bet the same artists and animators were not. JP3 felt very B-team to me in terms of the CGI. The animatronics had the same feeling as the other films. But the CGI felt flatter. More cartoonish in some ways. Maybe it was the coloring?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages4.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20120831151703%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2Fe%2Fe5%2FJurassic_park_3_brachiosaurus.jpg&hash=48604c710d275786abbc4a406e34b3c4234a01a0)

Maybe it was more of the staging and composition. The first witnessing of the herbivores from Jurassic Park was majestic and real. The homage to that shot in JP3 looked like amateur hour at best. Walking with Dinosaurs season 1. If that.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 25, 2013, 02:54:41 PM
Could've been. I do agree with your thoughts on the animation. Even the animatronic Spinosaurus shots didn't feel real. I don't know, there was just something about it that felt off to me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenodog on Oct 25, 2013, 05:58:44 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Oct 25, 2013, 02:32:38 PM
ILM did the CGI Dinosaurs for Jurassic Park 3 right? I always assumed they did. But I bet the same artists and animators were not. JP3 felt very B-team to me in terms of the CGI. The animatronics had the same feeling as the other films. But the CGI felt flatter. More cartoonish in some ways. Maybe it was the coloring?

http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120831151703/jurassicpark/images/e/e5/Jurassic_park_3_brachiosaurus.jpg

Maybe it was more of the staging and composition. The first witnessing of the herbivores from Jurassic Park was majestic and real. The homage to that shot in JP3 looked like amateur hour at best. Walking with Dinosaurs season 1. If that.

Walking with Dinosurs had great CGI I thought?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: UFO-Man on Oct 25, 2013, 06:05:18 PM
No just no.

Two Jurassic Park stories is enough to make 2 movies.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 25, 2013, 06:07:23 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzkU_ckRXHY# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzkU_ckRXHY#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Oct 25, 2013, 09:12:34 PM
Just about all of JPIII feels halfassed to me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 26, 2013, 12:23:45 AM
Quote from: Xenodog on Oct 25, 2013, 05:58:44 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Oct 25, 2013, 02:32:38 PM
ILM did the CGI Dinosaurs for Jurassic Park 3 right? I always assumed they did. But I bet the same artists and animators were not. JP3 felt very B-team to me in terms of the CGI. The animatronics had the same feeling as the other films. But the CGI felt flatter. More cartoonish in some ways. Maybe it was the coloring?

http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120831151703/jurassicpark/images/e/e5/Jurassic_park_3_brachiosaurus.jpg

Maybe it was more of the staging and composition. The first witnessing of the herbivores from Jurassic Park was majestic and real. The homage to that shot in JP3 looked like amateur hour at best. Walking with Dinosaurs season 1. If that.

Walking with Dinosurs had great CGI I thought?

It did, but that's a TV show. JP 3 was a multi-million dollar movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Oct 26, 2013, 03:07:33 AM
Quote from: Xenodog on Oct 25, 2013, 05:58:44 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Oct 25, 2013, 02:32:38 PM
ILM did the CGI Dinosaurs for Jurassic Park 3 right? I always assumed they did. But I bet the same artists and animators were not. JP3 felt very B-team to me in terms of the CGI. The animatronics had the same feeling as the other films. But the CGI felt flatter. More cartoonish in some ways. Maybe it was the coloring?

http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120831151703/jurassicpark/images/e/e5/Jurassic_park_3_brachiosaurus.jpg

Maybe it was more of the staging and composition. The first witnessing of the herbivores from Jurassic Park was majestic and real. The homage to that shot in JP3 looked like amateur hour at best. Walking with Dinosaurs season 1. If that.

Walking with Dinosurs had great CGI I thought?

For the time, some shots are pretty dodgey now a days, mostly underwater scenes with the CG Liopluerodon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 26, 2013, 01:21:38 PM
The animatronics they used looked really good too. Also remember too that the CG effects used in WWD were costing nearly $70K back then which for a TV show was unheard of and likely still is.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Oct 30, 2013, 09:00:21 AM
Wheres DoomRulz ?

I got a question, I  am just thinking of purchasing a rare Kenner jurassic park Dilophosaurus Figure and am just wondering how can I tell if its legit or not ?

With looking to see if has the JP mark on the leg ?

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 30, 2013, 06:41:59 PM
You could've PMed me, lol. But yes, that's how you can tell. Have a pic handy? I'd like to see it if you're really wondering.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 30, 2013, 07:20:04 PM
Doom, you need a nice Jurassic Park set for the forums.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Oct 30, 2013, 09:42:49 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 30, 2013, 06:41:59 PM
You could've PMed me, lol. But yes, that's how you can tell. Have a pic handy? I'd like to see it if you're really wondering.

True I could have lol.

Any way here it is :

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.ebayimg.com%2Ft%2FJurassic-park-Dilophosaurus-JP02-Dinosaur-1993-Kenner-6-inches-high-%2F00%2Fs%2FMTIwMFgxNjAw%2Fz%2F8pAAAOxyAs9SNio9%2F%24T2eC16d%2C%21%25290FIZ%2CtNuo%2BBSNio9B8oQ%7E%7E60_12.JPG&hash=5c151ab7c87c8064bbcd89aadbd5a3ba10a248b9)


(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.ebayimg.com%2Ft%2FJurassic-park-Dilophosaurus-JP02-Dinosaur-1993-Kenner-6-inches-high-%2F00%2Fs%2FMTIwMFgxMjAw%2Fz%2FwWkAAMXQfj9SNio3%2F%24%2528KGrHqZ%2C%21roFI%25291PjGo%2529BSNio27S2Q%7E%7E60_12.JPG&hash=01c102559cac3540f2730a5b6934c6e299e25709)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Feral_PRED on Oct 31, 2013, 02:40:13 AM
Potentially leaked Jurassic World storyboards and artwork reveal new Dinosaur?
http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1242 (http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1242)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Oct 31, 2013, 09:43:28 AM
^ Thanks for the link.

Done some research and I think this also could be a Carnotaurus as they are claiming it might be a Allosaurus.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jurassicparkiv.org%2Fnews%2Fuploads%2FCroppedJW3.jpg&hash=8a524a845eece2f22bc03cbe789adbf15b7a94ed)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 31, 2013, 10:40:52 AM
Does look like an Allosaurid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Oct 31, 2013, 10:46:39 AM
Both look very simular anyway.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 31, 2013, 11:59:57 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Oct 30, 2013, 07:20:04 PM
Doom, you need a nice Jurassic Park set for the forums.

What do you mean?

Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Oct 30, 2013, 09:42:49 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 30, 2013, 06:41:59 PM
You could've PMed me, lol. But yes, that's how you can tell. Have a pic handy? I'd like to see it if you're really wondering.

True I could have lol.

Any way here it is :

http://i.ebayimg.com/t/Jurassic-park-Dilophosaurus-JP02-Dinosaur-1993-Kenner-6-inches-high-/00/s/MTIwMFgxNjAw/z/8pAAAOxyAs9SNio9/$T2eC16d,!%290FIZ,tNuo+BSNio9B8oQ~~60_12.JPG


http://i.ebayimg.com/t/Jurassic-park-Dilophosaurus-JP02-Dinosaur-1993-Kenner-6-inches-high-/00/s/MTIwMFgxMjAw/z/wWkAAMXQfj9SNio3/$%28KGrHqZ,!roFI%291PjGo%29BSNio27S2Q~~60_12.JPG

Yup, it's legit.

Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Oct 31, 2013, 09:43:28 AM
^ Thanks for the link.

Done some research and I think this also could be a Carnotaurus as they are claiming it might be a Allosaurus.

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/news/uploads/CroppedJW3.jpg


That's definitely not Carnotaurus but it most certainly is a carnosaur.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Oct 31, 2013, 12:18:18 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 31, 2013, 11:59:57 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Oct 30, 2013, 07:20:04 PM
Doom, you need a nice Jurassic Park set for the forums.

What do you mean?
Set, as in avatar and signature.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 31, 2013, 12:18:48 PM
But...The Dude...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Oct 31, 2013, 12:35:53 PM
Hey maaaan, I'm just transcribin', dude! Have him riding a dinosaur! Now that shit would be righteous.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 31, 2013, 12:40:05 PM
How about Dudeassic Park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Oct 31, 2013, 12:42:49 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Oct 31, 2013, 12:40:05 PM
How about Dudeassic Park.

http://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=46728.0 (http://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=46728.0)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 31, 2013, 12:46:48 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FhViZYIs.png&hash=b2827c4bcbc9cb7d82cccaf2cf793a8b2826d0ce)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Oct 31, 2013, 12:47:40 PM
...guess that one was German.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 31, 2013, 02:30:42 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Oct 31, 2013, 12:35:53 PM
Hey maaaan, I'm just transcribin', dude! Have him riding a dinosaur! Now that shit would be righteous.

DEEEZ!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Oct 31, 2013, 04:22:43 PM
Loving the possible concept art, really would like to see an Allosaurus in a Jurassic Park movie. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 31, 2013, 04:56:38 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Oct 31, 2013, 12:40:05 PM
How about Dudeassic Park.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 09, 2013, 03:45:03 PM
Fences are failing all over the park, *snort*

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sjy7pI1UdRw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sjy7pI1UdRw#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Oct 31, 2013, 05:02:04 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 31, 2013, 11:59:57 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Oct 30, 2013, 07:20:04 PM
Doom, you need a nice Jurassic Park set for the forums.

What do you mean?

Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Oct 30, 2013, 09:42:49 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 30, 2013, 06:41:59 PM
You could've PMed me, lol. But yes, that's how you can tell. Have a pic handy? I'd like to see it if you're really wondering.

True I could have lol.

Any way here it is :

http://i.ebayimg.com/t/Jurassic-park-Dilophosaurus-JP02-Dinosaur-1993-Kenner-6-inches-high-/00/s/MTIwMFgxNjAw/z/8pAAAOxyAs9SNio9/$T2eC16d,!%290FIZ,tNuo+BSNio9B8oQ~~60_12.JPG


http://i.ebayimg.com/t/Jurassic-park-Dilophosaurus-JP02-Dinosaur-1993-Kenner-6-inches-high-/00/s/MTIwMFgxMjAw/z/wWkAAMXQfj9SNio3/$%28KGrHqZ,!roFI%291PjGo%29BSNio27S2Q~~60_12.JPG

Yup, it's legit.

Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Oct 31, 2013, 09:43:28 AM
^ Thanks for the link.

Done some research and I think this also could be a Carnotaurus as they are claiming it might be a Allosaurus.

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/news/uploads/CroppedJW3.jpg


That's definitely not Carnotaurus but it most certainly is a carnosaur.

Thanks :D

Thats another Dino added to my Kenner collection.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenodog on Oct 31, 2013, 07:04:50 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Oct 31, 2013, 12:46:48 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FhViZYIs.png&hash=b2827c4bcbc9cb7d82cccaf2cf793a8b2826d0ce)
I lost it.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Nov 01, 2013, 02:03:44 PM
Do Kenner usually have the word "kenner" printed on there products ?

Because I got my Dilo figure today and no sign of kenner ?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 01, 2013, 02:41:53 PM
On the bigger figures, it's usually on the underside of the belly near the legs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Nov 02, 2013, 03:49:14 PM
Oh right  thanks , its awesome  , you dip its head in water and squeeze its stomach and spits out water , was very popular in the 90's apparenty.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 02, 2013, 11:08:39 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Wvvn6eHJFs#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Wvvn6eHJFs#ws)

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=70 (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=70)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 02, 2013, 11:41:10 PM
Fake... but one HELL OF A FAKE. :) hope whoever put that together releases it in proper quality.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Nov 03, 2013, 04:20:32 AM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Nov 02, 2013, 03:49:14 PM
Oh right  thanks , its awesome  , you dip its head in water and squeeze its stomach and spits out water , was very popular in the 90's apparenty.
My brother had that one!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 03, 2013, 04:30:50 AM
I had that one...

my parents gave it away once i grew up.

le sigh. :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 03, 2013, 09:30:00 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Nov 02, 2013, 11:08:39 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Wvvn6eHJFs#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Wvvn6eHJFs#ws)

http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=70 (http://www.jurassicparkiv.org/?id=70)
Think I saw a shot from Predators there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Nov 03, 2013, 12:08:22 PM
You are correct, as well as stuff from Terra Nova.

Anybody who knows neither of those sources will be creaming their pants, because it would look pretty legitimate otherwise.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Keg on Nov 03, 2013, 09:50:58 PM
Speaking of Tera Nova did the first season end on a cliffhanger? I watched the first two episodes and then when It got cancelled i stopped. I cant stand getting invested in an entire series if theres no ending and everything is left hanging. I suspect that is definately the case with that one?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Nov 03, 2013, 10:00:56 PM
It was Earth the entire time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Nov 04, 2013, 10:00:11 AM
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/JURASSIC-PARK-BARBASOL-CRYOGENICS-CANISTER-CRYOCAN-CRYO-CAN-PROP-/221310698772?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item3387254514 (http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/JURASSIC-PARK-BARBASOL-CRYOGENICS-CANISTER-CRYOCAN-CRYO-CAN-PROP-/221310698772?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item3387254514)

Bid or not ? =/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 04, 2013, 01:18:28 PM
Quote from: Keg on Nov 03, 2013, 09:50:58 PM
Speaking of Tera Nova did the first season end on a cliffhanger? I watched the first two episodes and then when It got cancelled i stopped. I cant stand getting invested in an entire series if theres no ending and everything is left hanging. I suspect that is definately the case with that one?

Sort of. There was a missing character but for the most part the series did end with very few loose ends. *sigh* it was canceled way too soon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Nov 05, 2013, 05:44:04 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wzEu_sKcac#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wzEu_sKcac#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 06, 2013, 01:08:17 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-w-58hQ9dLk (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-w-58hQ9dLk)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Nov 06, 2013, 01:22:50 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Nov 03, 2013, 10:00:56 PM
It was Earth the entire time.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ft3.gstatic.com%2Fimages%3Fq%3Dtbn%3AANd9GcSShNZR01AXRqcKe2L--sLl1EbO1mJuTknz7KeYjt1DdXPuY9I8KzbZrclU&hash=9648ae9888f81b6b24413948c1dc2670a1317c0b)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 06, 2013, 01:25:01 AM
Quote from: SM on Nov 06, 2013, 01:22:50 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Nov 03, 2013, 10:00:56 PM
It was Earth the entire time.

http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSShNZR01AXRqcKe2L--sLl1EbO1mJuTknz7KeYjt1DdXPuY9I8KzbZrclU

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.iwastesomuchtime.com%2F102320131804101.jpg&hash=702078703982a968b5aedcd3c451090b48977171)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Nov 06, 2013, 04:12:33 PM
Jason Schwartzman seems to be in talks for a role in JW: http://screenrant.com/jurassic-park-4-world-cast-jason-schwartzman/ (http://screenrant.com/jurassic-park-4-world-cast-jason-schwartzman/)
And Bryce Dallas Howard is a go: http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/bryce-dallas-howard-confirms-she-will-star-in-colin-trevorrows-jurassic-world (http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/bryce-dallas-howard-confirms-she-will-star-in-colin-trevorrows-jurassic-world)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 07, 2013, 04:19:26 AM
 :(

http://jurassicparkiv.org/?id=73 (http://jurassicparkiv.org/?id=73)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Nov 07, 2013, 04:20:45 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Nov 06, 2013, 04:12:33 PM
And Bryce Dallas Howard is a go: http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/bryce-dallas-howard-confirms-she-will-star-in-colin-trevorrows-jurassic-world (http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/bryce-dallas-howard-confirms-she-will-star-in-colin-trevorrows-jurassic-world)
f**k yes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 07, 2013, 04:24:14 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Nov 07, 2013, 04:20:45 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Nov 06, 2013, 04:12:33 PM
And Bryce Dallas Howard is a go: http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/bryce-dallas-howard-confirms-she-will-star-in-colin-trevorrows-jurassic-world (http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/bryce-dallas-howard-confirms-she-will-star-in-colin-trevorrows-jurassic-world)
f**k yes.

+1

Spoiler
I'm just about the only Lady in the Water there is.  :laugh:
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 07, 2013, 02:23:40 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Nov 07, 2013, 04:19:26 AM
:(

http://jurassicparkiv.org/?id=73 (http://jurassicparkiv.org/?id=73)

Well that sucks. I envisioned him as playing an Alan Grant-like role in this one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Nov 11, 2013, 05:52:12 PM
Probably wasn't wanted anymore after another altercation in a pub 2 weeks ago. He has a history of being a little edgy...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 13, 2013, 04:53:12 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-5YfvenaYn7k%2FUoJl7HM8KSI%2FAAAAAAAAPxI%2FxVPb_H6RnWQ%2Fs1600%2F995537_10151938245978608_422996887_n.jpg&hash=aaea46632abca9ba7637cd3b720ed0a63ca4fa78)

Another fan-made.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 13, 2013, 12:17:08 PM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Nov 04, 2013, 10:00:11 AM
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/JURASSIC-PARK-BARBASOL-CRYOGENICS-CANISTER-CRYOCAN-CRYO-CAN-PROP-/221310698772?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item3387254514 (http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/JURASSIC-PARK-BARBASOL-CRYOGENICS-CANISTER-CRYOCAN-CRYO-CAN-PROP-/221310698772?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item3387254514)

Bid or not ? =/

I just bought that 8) sorry dude, LOL. But yes, you should've; to answer your question ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Nov 13, 2013, 03:23:29 PM
Damn! Lol when is your delivery expected to be?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 13, 2013, 03:51:06 PM
(https://fbcdn-photos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/559482_363980863747452_1051821515_n.jpg)

(https://fbcdn-photos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/s720x720/1395959_351423878336484_1996793531_n.jpg)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Nov 13, 2013, 03:58:00 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Nov 13, 2013, 03:51:06 PM
https://fbcdn-photos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/559482_363980863747452_1051821515_n.jpg

(https://fbcdn-photos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/s720x720/1395959_351423878336484_1996793531_n.jpg)

T-Rex looks super wasted in that first one. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 13, 2013, 04:24:45 PM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Nov 13, 2013, 03:23:29 PM
Damn! Lol when is your delivery expected to be?

It hasn't been shipped yet. I'm kinda close with the sellers and we worked out a private deal and he sells me stuff that he doesn't always list. I bagged a MIB Series 2 Quetzalcoatlus and when I pay him next which will be soon, THEN he'll ship me the cryocan for free with it. He also gave me a discount; $210, flat for the prop.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Nov 13, 2013, 05:44:15 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 13, 2013, 04:24:45 PM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Nov 13, 2013, 03:23:29 PM
Damn! Lol when is your delivery expected to be?

It hasn't been shipped yet. I'm kinda close with the sellers and we worked out a private deal and he sells me stuff that he doesn't always list. I bagged a MIB Series 2 Quetzalcoatlus and when I pay him next which will be soon, THEN he'll ship me the cryocan for free with it. He also gave me a discount; $210, flat for the prop.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fecx.images-amazon.com%2Fimages%2FI%2F41626R2C10L.jpg&hash=3231769f96cd8c0c607ffcd8c9f3ad848183efec)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Nov 13, 2013, 08:01:32 PM
This video is a must-watch:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yBZCj1k1iY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yBZCj1k1iY#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Nov 14, 2013, 01:15:26 AM
Jeff Sneider @TheInSneider
EXCLUSIVE: GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY star @prattprattpratt is being sought to star in Universal's JURASSIC WORLD! thewrap.com/chris-pratt-ju...

http://www.thewrap.com/chris-pratt-jurassic-world-lead-role (http://www.thewrap.com/chris-pratt-jurassic-world-lead-role)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 14, 2013, 03:43:29 AM
He had so much fun working with a genetically engineered Raccoon that he just had to give genetically engineered dinosaurs a try!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Nov 14, 2013, 04:34:22 AM
I like Chris Pratt a lot, but he doesn't seem like a good fit for this  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 14, 2013, 02:20:36 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Nov 13, 2013, 08:01:32 PM
This video is a must-watch:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yBZCj1k1iY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yBZCj1k1iY#ws)

Aside from getting the release date completely wrong, that video was awesome. The JP III sequence was more exciting than the entire film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Nov 14, 2013, 03:00:17 PM
So do we know where "jurassic World" will be actually set ?

Do we know if other parks have been created ?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 14, 2013, 04:07:16 PM
I'd actually prefer Pratt to Brolin now that I've had time to think about it.  I do like Brolin and I think he would have been a good fit too, but he's been in a lot of lead roles in resurrected franchises lately, or movies in general (MIB III, Gangster Squad, Old Boy, Sin City 2, etc.)  He's already a pretty well established actor and I think he would have been a little too predictable go-to choice to cast as a lead in JW.  Pratt, on the other hand, is a rising star right now and I could actually see him in a Jurassic Park universe.  Irrfan Khan would be a great supporting actor as well. (in case you guys didn't know that he's being rumored as well)

Still hope we get some returning cast members though.  It's the JP tradition!  Maybe Goldblum can make way for it now since ID4 2 has been (unfortunately) pushed a year back.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Nov 14, 2013, 04:35:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 14, 2013, 02:20:36 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Nov 13, 2013, 08:01:32 PM
This video is a must-watch:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yBZCj1k1iY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yBZCj1k1iY#ws)

Aside from getting the release date completely wrong, that video was awesome. The JP III sequence was more exciting than the entire film.

Well, this video was uploaded before the release date got pushed back.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 14, 2013, 11:08:12 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Nov 13, 2013, 08:01:32 PM
This video is a must-watch:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yBZCj1k1iY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yBZCj1k1iY#ws)

Ffff**k yesssss.  So goooood.  I love this franchise.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Nov 15, 2013, 03:34:57 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Nov 14, 2013, 11:08:12 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Nov 13, 2013, 08:01:32 PM
This video is a must-watch:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yBZCj1k1iY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yBZCj1k1iY#ws)

Ffff**k yesssss.  So goooood.  I love this franchise.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.bekahbrunstetter.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F04%2Fian-malcolm.jpg&hash=e66f13ec18a98024573f19687b4d9521d31647a3)

Look above you...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 15, 2013, 04:35:47 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Nov 14, 2013, 04:07:16 PM
I'd actually prefer Pratt to Brolin now that I've had time to think about it.  I do like Brolin and I think he would have been a good fit too, but he's been in a lot of lead roles in resurrected franchises lately, or movies in general (MIB III, Gangster Squad, Old Boy, Sin City 2, etc.)  He's already a pretty well established actor and I think he would have been a little too predictable go-to choice to cast as a lead in JW.  Pratt, on the other hand, is a rising star right now and I could actually see him in a Jurassic Park universe.  Irrfan Khan would be a great supporting actor as well. (in case you guys didn't know that he's being rumored as well)

Still hope we get some returning cast members though.  It's the JP tradition!  Maybe Goldblum can make way for it now since ID4 2 has been (unfortunately) pushed a year back.

Life of Pi guy? Hm. I see him playing a scientist.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 15, 2013, 11:40:57 PM
Wasn't he also the token minority villain in ASM? :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 16, 2013, 03:00:21 PM
Yep.



(https://fbcdn-photos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/s720x720/1457716_10151720529351615_324634147_n.png)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Nov 16, 2013, 06:16:29 PM
BD Wong Returning to the World of Jurassic Park?

QuoteYet another Jurassic World casting rumor has surfaced via Twitter last night. Responding to a fan question about the Jurassic Park character 'Dr. Wu', asking "What happened to Henry Wu after Jurassic Park?" the actor who portrayed the character in the first film, BD Wong responded by saying "Who knows? Stay tuned..." - teasing a potential spoiler of his return to the world of Jurassic Park in Jurassic World. Check out the tweet below:

BD WONG        ✔ @BD_WONG
Follow
@mr_alx75 @jurassicparkiv @LeDoctor @colintrevorrow @ConnollyDerek Who knows? Stay tuned...
4:21 AM - 14 Nov 2013

Now, it's possible Wong could just be leading us on in a teasing manner, but he could in fact have a role in the fourth Jurassic Park film. Whether it be no more than a cameo role or not, it would be cool to see the return of one of the original characters. Also, since Wong played one of the genetic scientists responsible for bringing Dinosaurs back to life in Jurassic Park, it could fit the hypothetical new plot synopsis in which a new park is being constructed / operating. Perhaps he gets hired on by BioSyn after the fall out of InGen? Who knows!


http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1280 (http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1280)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naissus on Nov 16, 2013, 07:49:14 PM
Rather than another greedy corporation trying to make a buck, I would rather see a government controlled park and perhaps base it on themes of balance between natural order and government control, of simply mans attempt to control life through government.  We all know no matter how much we try to control things life finds a way.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Nov 16, 2013, 10:09:19 PM
"...Damn."

*bangs car door*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 16, 2013, 10:11:17 PM
stick stupid
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 16, 2013, 10:50:58 PM
Quote from: Naissus on Nov 16, 2013, 07:49:14 PM
Rather than another greedy corporation trying to make a buck, I would rather see a government controlled park and perhaps base it on themes of balance between natural order and government control, of simply mans attempt to control life through government.  We all know no matter how much we try to control things life finds a way.

That sounds pretty much exactly like the first movie. I also seeing it being a bit preachy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naissus on Nov 17, 2013, 03:04:59 AM
What, like the Lost World?  Now that movie was preachy.  Well I think the themes from the first movie should be similar, the story can be completely different and still maintain similar themes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 18, 2013, 04:48:35 PM
Based on what you said, it sounds like the first film only with someone saying, "We learned our lesson and this time it will for sure work." We all know how that is going to play out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 18, 2013, 04:55:30 PM
I really really hope the new movie doesnt follow the "Let's go back to the islands for such and such reason" that 2 and 3 did. (Like tons of "hack" crap fan scripts). 

Bring something new to the table or dont bother at all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 18, 2013, 05:00:31 PM
Let's go back to the island and search for more sequels!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenodog on Nov 18, 2013, 07:06:00 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 18, 2013, 05:00:31 PM
Let's go back to the island and search for more sequels!

Let's breed the dinosaurs are Bioweapons. Hope they don't escape, cause shenanigans and cause marines to have to come in!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Nov 18, 2013, 11:07:17 PM
Jurassic Park 4 should be a legal movie about the cases between InGen, the families of its victims and its financially crippled investors, starting from John Hammond's childhood fascination with fleas. It should skip over the dinosaur parts, as we've seen that already so it would be boring.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naissus on Nov 19, 2013, 01:45:25 AM
DoomRulz, I had to go back and reread what  I wrote.  I see what you mean now.  I wrote it just as I was going to sleep.  Thats what I get.  Anyways, if JP4 does not retread on old ideas, what news can they make that at least feel original.  I do not think I can buy invasion of the dinosaurs.  It sounds too epic.  When I think Jurassic Park I also think isolation, maybe not as much as a horror game or movie (The Thing/Resident Evil).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 19, 2013, 03:23:47 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Nov 18, 2013, 11:07:17 PM
Jurassic Park 4 should be a legal movie about the cases between InGen, the families of its victims and its financially crippled investors, starting from John Hammond's childhood fascination with fleas. It should skip over the dinosaur parts, as we've seen that already so it would be boring.

Bingo.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 19, 2013, 12:50:08 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Nov 18, 2013, 11:07:17 PM
Jurassic Park 4 should be a legal movie about the cases between InGen, the families of its victims and its financially crippled investors, starting from John Hammond's childhood fascination with fleas. It should skip over the dinosaur parts, as we've seen that already so it would be boring.

So you want a Jurassic Park movie without dinosaurs?

How about Pacific Rim without jaegars or kaijus?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Never say no to Panda! on Nov 19, 2013, 02:34:41 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 19, 2013, 12:50:08 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Nov 18, 2013, 11:07:17 PM
How about Pacific Rim without jaegars or kaijus?


... would contribute to focus on the best part: actors.


(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.gawkerassets.com%2Fimg%2F18u5ijrsqzdwljpg%2Fku-medium.jpg&hash=40997945a75e87252f29c78de9495c8e7cacb79e)



;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 19, 2013, 02:43:24 PM
They spoke a total of maybe 50 words each. Not much to go on.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Nov 19, 2013, 02:53:01 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 19, 2013, 12:50:08 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Nov 18, 2013, 11:07:17 PM
Jurassic Park 4 should be a legal movie about the cases between InGen, the families of its victims and its financially crippled investors, starting from John Hammond's childhood fascination with fleas. It should skip over the dinosaur parts, as we've seen that already so it would be boring.

So you want a Jurassic Park movie without dinosaurs?

How about Pacific Rim without jaegars or kaijus?

*Coughs politely.*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Never say no to Panda! on Nov 19, 2013, 02:59:09 PM
I'm talking 'bout pretty much all actors  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 20, 2013, 03:37:24 AM
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/65158 (http://www.aintitcool.com/node/65158) Very recent interview with director, writer John Sayles about his new film (wich, btw, stars Admiral Adama himself, Edward James Olmos) .. and there's a question about JPIV.

QuoteBeaks: One of your most notorious unmade for-hire screenplays is JURASSIC PARK IV. It's been written about online many times, and has this hook that I think is terrific: dinosaurs on a mission.

QuoteSayles: I keep hearing that they've made it. If they've made it, they've had a lot of time to move quite far from what I did with it, but I'll be eager to see it and see that they did with it. I did a draft of THE MUMMY when Joe Dante was going to direct it. Eventually, when the movie came out, because I'm in the Writers Guild, they do an adjudication. "Here's the final script. Do you want to claim any credit?" There were fifteen different writers on THE MUMMY over quite a long period, including George Romero twice. I read it and I said, "Well, there's sand and a guy wrapped in bandages and he speaks Farsi at some point, but other than that, I'm not going to take any credit." I thought they made a very good movie, but they went in a totally different direction. So I imagine if and when JURASSIC PARK IV finally comes out, what I know is it'll be something very, very different, because they don't need to just drag people back to the island again and have big dinosaurs eat them. That's what they were looking into doing, and I'll be fascinated to see what they do with it.

QuoteI keep hearing that they've made it.

;D

CUE FANBOY UPROAR about the exact meaning of his words.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 20, 2013, 03:43:11 AM
I read that really quick and thought you said that Olmos was in the film. Now I wish he was in the film.

Spoiler
With little origami dinosaurs.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 20, 2013, 03:50:23 AM
I'd be cool with him having a part.. but only if he rocks the 'stache.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg6.bdbphotos.com%2Fimages%2Forig%2Fj%2Fa%2Fjam028c9a85i8ai8.jpg%3Fdjet1p5k&hash=4cc2516f53e8afac5f625d33a42c51c151f2e53b)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 20, 2013, 03:52:05 AM
The Adama-'stache 8)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdoubleawesome.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2009%2F06%2FEJO.jpg&hash=c258fc0f51a037f630360f1d607b2e160c3eec60)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 20, 2013, 03:53:44 AM
Just give him a swiss accent and he would be perfect to play Baron VON DRAX from the John Sayles JP4 script...:laugh: pretty much the anti-John Hammond.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 20, 2013, 03:57:18 AM
As long as his mustache argues about the chaos theory with Ian Malcolm I'm all for it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 20, 2013, 12:32:22 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Nov 20, 2013, 03:37:24 AM
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/65158 (http://www.aintitcool.com/node/65158) Very recent interview with director, writer John Sayles about his new film (wich, btw, stars Admiral Adama himself, Edward James Olmos) .. and there's a question about JPIV.

QuoteBeaks: One of your most notorious unmade for-hire screenplays is JURASSIC PARK IV. It's been written about online many times, and has this hook that I think is terrific: dinosaurs on a mission.

QuoteSayles: I keep hearing that they've made it. If they've made it, they've had a lot of time to move quite far from what I did with it, but I'll be eager to see it and see that they did with it. I did a draft of THE MUMMY when Joe Dante was going to direct it. Eventually, when the movie came out, because I'm in the Writers Guild, they do an adjudication. "Here's the final script. Do you want to claim any credit?" There were fifteen different writers on THE MUMMY over quite a long period, including George Romero twice. I read it and I said, "Well, there's sand and a guy wrapped in bandages and he speaks Farsi at some point, but other than that, I'm not going to take any credit." I thought they made a very good movie, but they went in a totally different direction. So I imagine if and when JURASSIC PARK IV finally comes out, what I know is it'll be something very, very different, because they don't need to just drag people back to the island again and have big dinosaurs eat them. That's what they were looking into doing, and I'll be fascinated to see what they do with it.

QuoteI keep hearing that they've made it.

;D

CUE FANBOY UPROAR about the exact meaning of his words.

I'm a bit pessimistic. Does he literally mean dinosaurs going on a mission, or this somehow referring to what the humans are doing?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Nov 20, 2013, 12:42:32 PM
He's talking about his oldass wacky JP4 script. Chill out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 20, 2013, 12:49:52 PM
What ScarHunter said.

Sayles is also saying the final film will probably spend a considerable amount of time outside of the islands.. (as that seemed to be the general direction the producers wanted to go in) but wont necessarily use anything of his script.

...but Colin Trevorrow did say we were going to get a new dinosaur in Jurassic World....

Spoiler
TROLOLOLOLOLOLO

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fl2.yimg.com%2Fbt%2Fapi%2Fres%2F1.2%2Fm06OOcGXWSzwSuelUw1Xhg--%2FYXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7cT04NQ--%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fmedia.zenfs.com%2Fen-GB%2Fblogs%2Fukiemovies%2Fjurassic-park-7.jpg&hash=79d2506cf639eb8713181feb85ab106dd972be7a)
[close]

But seriously.. if i had to bet on what the actual storyline for Jurassic World would be about:
Spoiler
It'll probably feature lots of dinosaurs out and about in south or central america... A few corrupt rich dudes procured dinosaur eggs from the Nublar/Sorna islands to breed and keep in private mansions and fields in the nearly isolated countryside.. but the dinosaurs escaped from their confinements... Cue a team of veterinarians and soldiers that need to go to south america and capture or put down the dinosaurs before they become a true part of the south american ecosystem.. that would be a nice way to do new films with lots of dinosaurs without repeating what happened in the first 3.... and then the 5th film could finally be about dinosaurs as attack dogs (as in Sayles's script) lolol
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 20, 2013, 01:23:33 PM
I would very much hope that JW is focused on the human element, with the dinosaurs being featured yet the story isn't necessarily about them. That was something the first film did very well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 20, 2013, 03:59:33 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Nov 20, 2013, 12:49:52 PM
But seriously.. if i had to bet on what the actual storyline for Jurassic World would be about:
Spoiler
It'll probably feature lots of dinosaurs out and about in south or central america... A few corrupt rich dudes procured dinosaur eggs from the Nublar/Sorna islands to breed and keep in private mansions and fields in the nearly isolated countryside.. but the dinosaurs escaped from their confinements... Cue a team of veterinarians and soldiers that need to go to south america and capture or put down the dinosaurs before they become a true part of the south american ecosystem.. that would be a nice way to do new films with lots of dinosaurs without repeating what happened in the first 3.... and then the 5th film could finally be about dinosaurs as attack dogs (as in Sayles's script) lolol
[close]

Sounds about right.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Nov 23, 2013, 07:49:33 PM
Looks like Idris Elba won't be in Jurassic World

http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1291 (http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1291)

Jurassic World will have the same 'DNA' as the last three films says Rick Carter

http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1289 (http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1289)

Jurassic World Movie NewsJack Horner discusses the 'scary' new Dinosaur in Jurassic World

http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1286 (http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1286)

Also I think I like to compare the title Jurassic World to "Sea World" (United States chain of marine mammal parks, oceanariums) which gives me the idea we could see water dinos in this film , who knows....
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 23, 2013, 08:02:11 PM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Nov 23, 2013, 07:49:33 PM

Jurassic World will have the same 'DNA' as the last three films says Rick Carter

http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1289 (http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1289)


I for one welcome the Dino Engineers. ;D

Quote

Jurassic World Movie NewsJack Horner discusses the 'scary' new Dinosaur in Jurassic World

http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1286 (http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1286)


Cue people complaining 'cause "bastard killed mah rex."  ::)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 23, 2013, 09:59:00 PM
...Carnotaurus... i'm calling it right now :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Nov 23, 2013, 10:21:23 PM
Well, I'm fine with Elba not being in JW as long as it's due to him being occupied with another project...

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.bestlittlesites.com%2Fimages%2Fuploads%2Frebirth.jpg&hash=29247cb92f848ed42de0c1209623916f30f0d93d)

:P
[close]

Other than that, noooooooo!   :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 25, 2013, 12:36:19 PM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Nov 23, 2013, 07:49:33 PM
Jurassic World Movie NewsJack Horner discusses the 'scary' new Dinosaur in Jurassic World

If it is Troodon, I don't anticipate it being any scarier than Compsognathus from TLW. It's just another small theropod. I suppose it could be Carnotaurus but that's only if the camouflage idea from the TLW novel is included. As a regular theropod, it's no scarier than Allosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Nov 25, 2013, 01:48:55 PM
The Jurassic Park game from TellTale takes some liberties with Troodon - it paralyses prey, then opens them up and lays eggs in their innards. More info here (http://jurassicpark.wikia.com/wiki/Troodon) if you're interested. They tried to make them as creepy as possible.

Game aside, Troodon's defined by nocturnal adaptation, varied feeding behaviour and an exceptionally large brain. I've made various rants in the general dinosaur thread about the murky relationship between brain size and intelligence, but I'd imagine that if Jurassic Park tackled Troodon, they'd make it a super-smart ninjasaurus.

Anyway. I think Doom and BlackLabel are probably right about the new 'scary' dinosaur being Carnotaurus. It's one of the few major elements of Crichton's books that haven't yet been worked into the films, and it's something that fans have been very vocal about for years. And it has a lot of cinematic potential.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 25, 2013, 02:03:39 PM
Carnotaurus or Troodon will probably be it... ....unless they pull something completely out of the left field with a completely genetically engineered hybrid dino. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 25, 2013, 02:04:14 PM
Please no.

And that Troodon idea from telltale sounds freaking stupid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 25, 2013, 02:10:32 PM
The comments from Jack Horner about "keeping the light on at night" do hint at a nocturnal creature at least. eh! The plot thickens.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Nov 25, 2013, 02:26:38 PM
carnos pls
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 25, 2013, 02:27:49 PM
It could be a Troodon that is given the same narcotic venomous saliva that the Compys had in the first book.

That or camo Carno.  I'd also really like to see an adult Dilophosaurus treated with the same terror from the first book.  The way Nedry's death went down was hair-raising. 

I think it'd be cool to see more dinos with interesting natural attack/defense.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 25, 2013, 02:32:02 PM
These are kid friendly films.. no R-Rated Jurassic Park Dino Horror, ever. :P

But yeah.. poisons.. chameleon like colour changing.... Thumbs up. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 25, 2013, 04:23:15 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Nov 25, 2013, 01:48:55 PM
The Jurassic Park game from TellTale takes some liberties with Troodon - it paralyses prey, then opens them up and lays eggs in their innards. More info here (http://jurassicpark.wikia.com/wiki/Troodon) if you're interested. They tried to make them as creepy as possible.

Game aside, Troodon's defined by nocturnal adaptation, varied feeding behaviour and an exceptionally large brain. I've made various rants in the general dinosaur thread about the murky relationship between brain size and intelligence, but I'd imagine that if Jurassic Park tackled Troodon, they'd make it a super-smart ninjasaurus.

Yeah, I remember Telltale's version. For a game, it was cool. But I don't want to see that in a movie because as much as I love Jurassic Park, it has created amongst the general public a very warped view of what dinosaurs were like.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Nov 25, 2013, 04:35:55 PM
Needs more Mosasaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Nov 25, 2013, 06:09:03 PM
We probably will be getting it, what with the aquatic section and stuff.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Nov 25, 2013, 08:00:29 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Nov 25, 2013, 02:27:49 PM
It could be a Troodon that is given the same narcotic venomous saliva that the Compys had in the first book.

That or camo Carno.  I'd also really like to see an adult Dilophosaurus treated with the same terror from the first book.  The way Nedry's death went down was hair-raising. 

I think it'd be cool to see more dinos with interesting natural attack/defense.

Thats what exactly made me love the Dilo , I mean the spitting venom and the neck frill is just awesome feature which they added.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 26, 2013, 02:14:55 AM
I guess Eddie is the one that drove this baby....

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjurassicpark2%2Flwcut%2Forganize5.jpg&hash=acda3857b87e08827f305b066e086853340087cc)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Nov 26, 2013, 03:07:12 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Nov 26, 2013, 02:14:55 AM
I guess Eddie is the one that drove this baby....

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjurassicpark2%2Flwcut%2Forganize5.jpg&hash=acda3857b87e08827f305b066e086853340087cc)
I was always interested who did, not surprised it was Eddie, Nick and/or Ian couldn't handle the power. Always loved that the vehicles John Hammand had for them were Mercedes-Benz  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Nov 26, 2013, 11:51:05 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Nov 23, 2013, 09:59:00 PM
...Carnotaurus... i'm calling it right now :P
Man, if they take the camouflage idea from The Lost World's novel as well as elements from the evasion scenes, I will be kicking myself in excitement.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Nov 26, 2013, 12:20:48 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Nov 26, 2013, 11:51:05 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Nov 23, 2013, 09:59:00 PM
...Carnotaurus... i'm calling it right now :P
Man, if they take the camouflage idea from The Lost World's novel as well as elements from the evasion scenes, I will be kicking myself in excitement.

This.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 26, 2013, 03:21:15 PM
I want to see a T.Rex fight an Ankylosaurus in the movie. Why? Because dinosaurs, that's why.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Nov 26, 2013, 03:42:18 PM
T-Rex Vs. Triceratops or GTFO
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 26, 2013, 03:47:08 PM
that's a classic. ^ Has to be made.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 26, 2013, 03:49:38 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Nov 26, 2013, 03:42:18 PM
T-Rex Vs. Triceratops or GTFO
This!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 26, 2013, 03:58:59 PM
Eh, it's been done. We need something new.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Nov 26, 2013, 04:14:07 PM
I'd like to see dinosaurs grazing, laying around, yawning, itching themselves, grooming, socialising, enjoying a scrubdown, enduring their exuberant dinosaurlings. Preferably without roaring or posing. Y'know, generally being animals rather than monsters, which I think the last two films (particularly JP3) have forgotten.

But yeah, watching an inter-dinosaur hunt would be cool. Maybe even a failed one, which is another unadapted element from the second book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 26, 2013, 04:16:15 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Nov 26, 2013, 03:07:12 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Nov 26, 2013, 02:14:55 AM
I guess Eddie is the one that drove this baby....

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjurassicpark2%2Flwcut%2Forganize5.jpg&hash=acda3857b87e08827f305b066e086853340087cc)
I was always interested who did, not surprised it was Eddie, Nick and/or Ian couldn't handle the power. Always loved that the vehicles John Hammand had for them were Mercedes-Benz  8)

Funny, cause in the book they were Ford Explorers, which was the vehicle used in the first film- where as the vehicles in the first book were Toyota Land Cruisers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Nov 27, 2013, 04:12:28 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Nov 26, 2013, 04:16:15 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Nov 26, 2013, 03:07:12 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Nov 26, 2013, 02:14:55 AM
I guess Eddie is the one that drove this baby....

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjurassicpark2%2Flwcut%2Forganize5.jpg&hash=acda3857b87e08827f305b066e086853340087cc)
I was always interested who did, not surprised it was Eddie, Nick and/or Ian couldn't handle the power. Always loved that the vehicles John Hammand had for them were Mercedes-Benz  8)

Funny, cause in the book they were Ford Explorers, which was the vehicle used in the first film- where as the vehicles in the first book were Toyota Land Cruisers.
Like this?
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic1.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20120312174861%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2Fb%2Fb9%2FJplandcruiser.jpg&hash=d78319f14b62a79931b9c971fdec45ff31c0f375)

Def. right about the Ford Explorers too.
Spoiler
If Hammand spared no expense, why would he buy a Fix Or Repair Daily band of vehicles?  :P
[close]
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fthatwasabitmental.files.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F12%2Fjurassicpark2.jpg&hash=001a42680504d70bb90bc397d81c8532e8e97e57)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2013, 12:18:49 PM
The Explorers do look much nicer, you have to admit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Nov 27, 2013, 06:22:12 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Nov 26, 2013, 04:14:07 PMI'd like to see dinosaurs grazing, laying around, yawning, itching themselves, grooming, socialising, enjoying a scrubdown, enduring their exuberant dinosaurlings. Preferably without roaring or posing. Y'know, generally being animals rather than monsters

I believe we almost had this movie before it devolved into this nonsense
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fen%2F9%2F9f%2FWalking_with_Dinosaurs_film_poster.jpg&hash=981510f955b9a41ea931cb7f643ae04f434d3612)

Jurassic Park changed everything but we've seen nothing but JP dinos since then. It's going to take someone with balls to go, "You know what, we can do better now" for another leap like that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Nov 27, 2013, 06:44:46 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2013, 12:18:49 PM
The Explorers do look much nicer, you have to admit.

"Spare no expense."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2013, 07:29:05 PM
Quote from: Gilfryd on Nov 27, 2013, 06:22:12 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Nov 26, 2013, 04:14:07 PMI'd like to see dinosaurs grazing, laying around, yawning, itching themselves, grooming, socialising, enjoying a scrubdown, enduring their exuberant dinosaurlings. Preferably without roaring or posing. Y'know, generally being animals rather than monsters

I believe we almost had this movie before it devolved into this nonsense
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fen%2F9%2F9f%2FWalking_with_Dinosaurs_film_poster.jpg&hash=981510f955b9a41ea931cb7f643ae04f434d3612)

Jurassic Park changed everything but we've seen nothing but JP dinos since then. It's going to take someone with balls to go, "You know what, we can do better now" for another leap like that.

Actually, this movie would've been absolutely perfect in my view had the voices not been included.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Nov 27, 2013, 07:31:55 PM
^I agree, hopefully when the DVD comes out they have an option to turn them off or have the narrator from the BBC series narrating.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenodog on Nov 27, 2013, 07:50:48 PM
Quote from: Godzillakuj94 on Nov 27, 2013, 07:31:55 PM
^I agree, hopefully when the DVD comes out they have an option to turn them off or have the narrator from the BBC series narrating.

:laugh:
'Install Kenneth Brannagh mode'
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 28, 2013, 06:04:33 PM
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/?a=90622 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/?a=90622)

^ Film takes place 22 years after the original. Real time ;) 

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/chris-pratt-early-talks-star-655928 (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/chris-pratt-early-talks-star-655928)

^This is an old report.. but it had info on the characters:

QuotePratt would star as the movie's male lead, a rugged ex-military man, whose foil is the already-cast Bryce Dallas Howard, who plays a smart corporate scientist.

Roughly the same basic descriptions of the lead characters of the John Sayles script for Jurassic Park 4. So they are probably using some "elements" at least? The leads on that script were: Nick Harris, an ex-military guy down on his luck who gets hired by Richard Hammond for a special mission. Maya, a biologist and animal trainer who worked for Grendel Corporation.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 28, 2013, 06:26:41 PM
Might just be a basic continuation of the first film...not really acknowledging TLW and JP 3 any more than saying they happened.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Nov 28, 2013, 07:44:06 PM
Everyone check out my Dilo toy Packaging prototypes....

Heres the packaging spread out...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth07.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2013%2F332%2F1%2F4%2Fmy_dilo_packaging_design___prototype_by_dilophosaurusalpha-d6vz82s.png&hash=c6d448cd46add825c6b28ffe3f4a25775c331cc3)

Here it is all closed :

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc07.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2Fi%2F2013%2F332%2Ff%2Fe%2Fmy_dilo_packaging_design___prototype___2_by_dilophosaurusalpha-d6vz887.png&hash=f0e0767f536818fb37c07fffbb74ec8b46c0cebc)

and inside...:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth04.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2013%2F332%2F9%2Fd%2Fmy_dilo_packaging_design___prototype___back_by_dilophosaurusalpha-d6vz8bs.png&hash=516e4617f4270129bc76e89329f216912b39e95d)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 28, 2013, 09:52:37 PM
Looks good!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Nov 29, 2013, 01:06:53 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Nov 28, 2013, 09:52:37 PM
Looks good!
Thanks,  have you got DeviantArt?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 29, 2013, 05:10:44 AM
Nah, I'm staying away from that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Nov 29, 2013, 09:14:13 AM
Haha oh right.  Some guy is a Jurassic park fanatic on there lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 30, 2013, 06:35:31 PM
Hey guys just thought you'd like to know Episode 9 of my Jurassic Park podcast is out now and it features a very interesting interview with Taylor Nichols Mark Degler in JP3! He talks about an alternate ending to JP3 that was originally going to be filmed!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages3.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20110303154902%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2Fd%2Fd8%2FMarkdegler.jpg&hash=70f0ec1918b4154c250d0443574673d1056edcb2)

Its on iTunes, Stitcher, or in the links on the right of the website here...
http://www.jpforever.com/ (http://www.jpforever.com/)

Enjoy dudes!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 30, 2013, 08:33:23 PM
Just listened to it.  Interesting that you actually had that long of a conversation with him.  Great!

But....You guys never told me what vehicles you'd like to see in Jurassic World!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 30, 2013, 08:38:36 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Nov 30, 2013, 08:33:23 PM
But....You guys never told me what vehicles you'd like to see in Jurassic World!

A tram or monorail ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 30, 2013, 08:41:08 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 30, 2013, 08:38:36 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Nov 30, 2013, 08:33:23 PM
But....You guys never told me what vehicles you'd like to see in Jurassic World!

A tram or monorail ;)

.........That would be great!  We could have a destruction scene with a nod towards King Kong/Godzilla.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Dec 01, 2013, 01:28:41 AM
My Jurassic World "Dino Burger" box designs :

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth01.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2013%2F334%2Fb%2F2%2Fjurassic_world_dino_burger_box_3_by_dilophosaurusalpha-d6w9vxv.png&hash=6868248483366692b27ecde57b20291084d8e067)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth03.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2013%2F334%2Ff%2F1%2Fjurassic_world_dino_burger_box_2_by_dilophosaurusalpha-d6w9vps.png&hash=2343f718f2e4a033dd56d97ed0e6bbb3dcf85f0f)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth06.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2013%2F334%2Fc%2F8%2Fjurassic_world_dino_burger_box_by_dilophosaurusalpha-d6w9vh9.png&hash=24a964201570180961623f107bf6aedf4118f680)

Not final but still look quite awesome :)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 01, 2013, 01:30:04 AM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Dec 01, 2013, 01:28:41 AM
My Jurassic World "Dino Burger" box designs :

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth01.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2013%2F334%2Fb%2F2%2Fjurassic_world_dino_burger_box_3_by_dilophosaurusalpha-d6w9vxv.png&hash=6868248483366692b27ecde57b20291084d8e067)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth03.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2013%2F334%2Ff%2F1%2Fjurassic_world_dino_burger_box_2_by_dilophosaurusalpha-d6w9vps.png&hash=2343f718f2e4a033dd56d97ed0e6bbb3dcf85f0f)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth06.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2013%2F334%2Fc%2F8%2Fjurassic_world_dino_burger_box_by_dilophosaurusalpha-d6w9vh9.png&hash=24a964201570180961623f107bf6aedf4118f680)

Not final but still look quite awesome :)

Is the dino burger made of dilophosaurus?

If so, is it still poisonous?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Dec 01, 2013, 01:34:24 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 01, 2013, 01:30:04 AM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Dec 01, 2013, 01:28:41 AM
My Jurassic World "Dino Burger" box designs :

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth01.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2013%2F334%2Fb%2F2%2Fjurassic_world_dino_burger_box_3_by_dilophosaurusalpha-d6w9vxv.png&hash=6868248483366692b27ecde57b20291084d8e067)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth03.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2013%2F334%2Ff%2F1%2Fjurassic_world_dino_burger_box_2_by_dilophosaurusalpha-d6w9vps.png&hash=2343f718f2e4a033dd56d97ed0e6bbb3dcf85f0f)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth06.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2013%2F334%2Fc%2F8%2Fjurassic_world_dino_burger_box_by_dilophosaurusalpha-d6w9vh9.png&hash=24a964201570180961623f107bf6aedf4118f680)

Not final but still look quite awesome :)

Is the dino burger made of dilophosaurus?

If so, is it still poisonous?

Nope they are 100% T-Rex ;)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 01, 2013, 07:07:45 AM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Dec 01, 2013, 01:34:24 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 01, 2013, 01:30:04 AM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Dec 01, 2013, 01:28:41 AM
My Jurassic World "Dino Burger" box designs :

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth01.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2013%2F334%2Fb%2F2%2Fjurassic_world_dino_burger_box_3_by_dilophosaurusalpha-d6w9vxv.png&hash=6868248483366692b27ecde57b20291084d8e067)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth03.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2013%2F334%2Ff%2F1%2Fjurassic_world_dino_burger_box_2_by_dilophosaurusalpha-d6w9vps.png&hash=2343f718f2e4a033dd56d97ed0e6bbb3dcf85f0f)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth06.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2013%2F334%2Fc%2F8%2Fjurassic_world_dino_burger_box_by_dilophosaurusalpha-d6w9vh9.png&hash=24a964201570180961623f107bf6aedf4118f680)

Not final but still look quite awesome :)

Is the dino burger made of dilophosaurus?

If so, is it still poisonous?

Nope they are 100% T-Rex ;)

"T-Rex doesn't want to be fed (upon)...."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Dec 02, 2013, 07:25:27 PM
Anyone got Deviant Art ?

A project I am Working on ATM:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc07.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2Ff%2F2013%2F335%2F5%2F5%2Fthe_ingen_project__coming_soon___final_design__by_dilophosaurusalpha-d6wek7n.png&hash=64498ba3cb17266b549f7eeaf5c89dfabbc5bf94)

-------------------------------------------------------
InGen ID badge "access all areas" its basically a skeleton key.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth03.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2013%2F336%2F1%2Fc%2Fthe_ingen_project___ingen_id_badge_by_dilophosaurusalpha-d6whno6.png&hash=ee23a7fb42f68f536849553a26cd7fd86ef3b542)

Raptor Claw

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth07.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2013%2F336%2F6%2F3%2Fthe_ingen_project__raptor_claw_by_dilophosaurusalpha-d6wgmco.png&hash=d7812dbc25b0c4766dfb3e2945914717c234d795)

Raptor Resonating Chamber

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth02.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2013%2F336%2Fa%2Fa%2Fthe_ingen_project___raptor_resonating__chamber_by_dilophosaurusalpha-d6wgmt7.png&hash=7b01d9077ecd49be1c63325fbde22088f104ef82)

For this project, wont just be Dinos in full but as you have seen in these pictures it will feature skeletons , Eggs , Vehicles and much more!

Many more to come so have a look out!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 02, 2013, 11:07:58 PM
Requiem, your work is look quite good!! I look forward to seeing the final results :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Dec 03, 2013, 12:21:27 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 02, 2013, 11:07:58 PM
Requiem, your work is look quite good!! I look forward to seeing the final results :)

Whats his work ?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 03, 2013, 01:48:01 AM
It's okay, I think he meant yours  ;)

Can't wait to see vehicle stuff!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 03, 2013, 01:48:50 AM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Dec 03, 2013, 12:21:27 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 02, 2013, 11:07:58 PM
Requiem, your work is look quite good!! I look forward to seeing the final results :)

Whats his work ?

Ah crap, meant yours!!!! SO SORRY!!!! I don't know how I mixed you two up :-[
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Dec 03, 2013, 09:55:33 AM
Haha its okay man :) , yeah its an interesting project I am currently working on this atm ....

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm3.static.flickr.com%2F2128%2F2124272149_6a4e75388b.jpg&hash=074990078306981e2776e8d8df685b0b4dd76ff1)

Also here is more work I have just uploaded..

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth04.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2013%2F337%2F4%2F3%2Ftriceratops_by_dilophosaurusalpha-d6wktd3.png&hash=40619da2cc39feb7540b96c9234d1fec7e204d28)

^^ Thats my  fav  ;D


(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth04.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2013%2F337%2F5%2Fa%2Fankylosaurus_tail__by_dilophosaurusalpha-d6wksom.png&hash=e06bd693e17288193f4d06918136cd30330737b5)


(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth09.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2013%2F337%2Ff%2F6%2Ftroodon_by_dilophosaurusalpha-d6wkszm.png&hash=1a18a5b2cd037d40b1390e43f2f7c34a4937fce7)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Dec 06, 2013, 05:24:54 PM
Chris Pratt is in final talks for JW: http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/?a=91091 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/?a=91091)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Dec 09, 2013, 05:56:59 AM
Where's Idris Elba  >:(


Seriously though, I like Pratt but it seems like an odd choice for a Jurassic Park movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dark Passenger on Dec 09, 2013, 08:33:07 AM
Question I'm curious about is what might be the big bad dino in the new film.
I mean I didn't mind the Spino but something different would be nice.
Maybe a Giganotosaurus or a Carcharodontosaurus, it's rumoured that these may have travelled in packs which would look pretty gnarly on the big screen in my opinion.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 09, 2013, 01:02:33 PM
Most speculation right now is either Troodon or Carnotaurus. Most of us here it seems want the latter.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dark Passenger on Dec 09, 2013, 02:02:51 PM
Oh ok, a Carnotaurus sounds interesting,
Didn't we see a cameo of one in JP3? the scene when their digging through the Spino poop for the cell phone and it stumbles upon them and walks off? I might be remembering wrong..
Could be a cool dinosaur to see more of.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Dec 09, 2013, 02:11:56 PM
That's Ceratosaurus. They're members of the same evolutionary line, but there's over 80 million years between the two, and Carnotaurus was rather freakier (particularly in Crichton's book canon).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 09, 2013, 03:10:48 PM
And it was horribly oversized.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Dec 10, 2013, 12:04:41 AM
I asked the JP operations people about the CND, got ignored and blocked. I feel sorry for the guys.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 10, 2013, 01:12:24 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 09, 2013, 03:10:48 PM
And it was horribly oversized.

The Ceratosaurus?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Dec 10, 2013, 02:46:02 AM
If so, that makes no sense...unless Doom meant undersized?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Dec 10, 2013, 03:12:01 AM
Quote from: Gate on Dec 10, 2013, 12:04:41 AM
I asked the JP operations people about the CND, got ignored and blocked. I feel sorry for the guys.

I mentioned that they ignored the CND letter in one of their posts and they said people thought that's what happened when there was changes/difficulties in the creative team. Sounds like bull.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 10, 2013, 02:27:13 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Dec 10, 2013, 01:12:24 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 09, 2013, 03:10:48 PM
And it was horribly oversized.

The Ceratosaurus?

Yes. Ceratosaurus was only about 6.5 feet tall. The one in the movie looked more like it was 8.5 feet tall. That may have been due to the camera angle though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 10, 2013, 03:57:48 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 10, 2013, 02:27:13 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Dec 10, 2013, 01:12:24 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 09, 2013, 03:10:48 PM
And it was horribly oversized.

The Ceratosaurus?

Yes. Ceratosaurus was only about 6.5 feet tall. The one in the movie looked more like it was 8.5 feet tall. That may have been due to the camera angle though.

Or Hollywood.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 10, 2013, 04:37:41 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Dec 10, 2013, 03:57:48 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 10, 2013, 02:27:13 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Dec 10, 2013, 01:12:24 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 09, 2013, 03:10:48 PM
And it was horribly oversized.

The Ceratosaurus?

Yes. Ceratosaurus was only about 6.5 feet tall. The one in the movie looked more like it was 8.5 feet tall. That may have been due to the camera angle though.

Or Hollywood.

Like I said: oversized.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 10, 2013, 05:34:16 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 10, 2013, 04:37:41 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Dec 10, 2013, 03:57:48 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 10, 2013, 02:27:13 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Dec 10, 2013, 01:12:24 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 09, 2013, 03:10:48 PM
And it was horribly oversized.

The Ceratosaurus?

Yes. Ceratosaurus was only about 6.5 feet tall. The one in the movie looked more like it was 8.5 feet tall. That may have been due to the camera angle though.

Or Hollywood.

Like I said: oversized.

lol.

Btw, Who do you guys think was portrayed closely to Richard Levine's character from Crichton's The Lost World in the existing film franchise? 

I want to say either Roland Tembo or Possibly Billy Brenan.  Tembo for his stubborn devotion to seek his own interests and Brenan for his recklessness.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 10, 2013, 05:37:59 PM
Wasn't Levine the nerdy paleontologist guy always arguing with Malcolm? Tembo definitely does not resemble him at all. I think some of his lines of thoughts were transferred to Sarah, though.

Billy? Naaah.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Dec 10, 2013, 05:39:41 PM
Psychically he looks a lot like Roland's friend, Ajay.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Dec 10, 2013, 05:51:44 PM
Agreed with 'Zilly - while Levine's spirit is nearly non-existant in the film, I think Sarah got the most of what's used. She's the one setting out to the island on her own, somewhat overconfident and full of zeal, and loses her backpack. Burke obviously is the nerdy palaeontologist, but beyond that archetype he's not really given much of a character.

Come to think of it, the film's Sarah is a major departure from her novel basis. Not nearly as cool, tough or capable, and comes off as just as much of a palaeontologist as a naturalist.
Shame then that they kept Malcolm so similar to his book version, which was one of the biggest issues I took with it. The original character was hilarious and charismatic, The Lost World's was like... well, like he was cripplingly mauled by a Tyrannosaurus and was forced into facing a repeat of it, I guess. But I didn't like it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 10, 2013, 05:56:27 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Dec 10, 2013, 05:39:41 PM
Psychically he looks a lot like Roland's friend, Ajay.

This is true for me too.

@ Omega & Vertigo,

That's also true, I guess I didn't really realize how similar Sarah was to Levine's portrayal.  It's really funny how many characters they blended for the film version - Levine and Harding, Kelly and Arby & Eddie and Thorne.  Nick Van-Owen just sorta feels out of the blue.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 10, 2013, 06:22:02 PM
Could've been replaced by Thorne altogether. I mean Thorne is f**king awesome. Motorcycle chase and all.

But I don't mind in the end.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Dec 10, 2013, 06:23:28 PM
Eh, if it's a choice between Thorne and Tembo, I'll go with Tembo any time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Dec 10, 2013, 07:28:26 PM
T.Rex had better be the main dinosaur...Seriously. Imma be pissed if he isn't.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 11, 2013, 06:04:14 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Dec 10, 2013, 06:23:28 PM
Eh, if it's a choice between Thorne and Tembo, I'll go with Tembo any time.
I was talking about Van Owen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Dec 11, 2013, 06:07:18 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Dec 11, 2013, 06:04:14 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Dec 10, 2013, 06:23:28 PM
Eh, if it's a choice between Thorne and Tembo, I'll go with Tembo any time.
I was talking about Van Owen.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-BY_lQAYkVEY%2FTcdDoJWSODI%2FAAAAAAAAA7g%2FOVbtdDgdd3k%2Fs1600%2Fpsycho%2B1998%2Bgus%2Bvan%2Bsant%2Bvince%2Bvaughn%2Bfunny%2Bface.jpg&hash=bc7e654e790537ac3b1bc2dca49e347fd6b3c053)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 11, 2013, 02:35:01 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fromdirector.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F03%2Fjurassic_park_lost_world.png&hash=02962697469ed4fd68f0009e101ada831709a838)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 11, 2013, 03:56:18 PM
I know this has been speculated a lot lately,but I really feel like the new terrifying dinosaur in Jurassic World will be the Carnotaurus from The Lost World.  The part in the book just totally sells the idea of it being true.  Let's face it, that camouflage description, shifting in the light and dark, was pretty hair-raising.  With Jack Horner saying this new dinosaur will make you want to keep the light on at night, I feel like he totally gave it away.  Granted in a recent interview, he says that he never read the books, but I'm pretty sure the studio had and explained their adaptation of the dinosaur to Horner, which he might have given some pointers on how to do it believably on screen.

I really hope it's true.  It'd be great to see that part on film.  And a nice nod to one of the books, like JPIII did with the pteranodon aviary.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Dec 11, 2013, 04:04:41 PM
As long as T.Rex is the main dinosaur again, I don't give a damn what the new dinosaur is.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 11, 2013, 04:12:58 PM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Dec 11, 2013, 04:04:41 PM
As long as T.Rex is the main dinosaur again, I don't give a damn what the new dinosaur is.

8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Dec 11, 2013, 05:05:57 PM
Yawn, bring on something new.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Dec 11, 2013, 05:07:50 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Dec 11, 2013, 05:05:57 PM
Yawn
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fromdirector.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F03%2Fjurassic_park_lost_world.png&hash=02962697469ed4fd68f0009e101ada831709a838)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Dec 13, 2013, 02:41:37 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth04.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2013%2F337%2F4%2F3%2Ftriceratops_by_dilophosaurusalpha-d6wktd3.png&hash=40619da2cc39feb7540b96c9234d1fec7e204d28)

Anyone like my Trike ? :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Dec 13, 2013, 02:43:50 PM
Yis~
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 13, 2013, 04:05:38 PM
Well done, Dilo  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Dec 13, 2013, 04:10:14 PM
Thanks guys :D

check out my page for more see what you think !

http://dilophosaurusalpha.deviantart.com/ (http://dilophosaurusalpha.deviantart.com/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 14, 2013, 07:40:31 PM
http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1348 (http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1348)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Dec 15, 2013, 04:52:48 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Dec 14, 2013, 07:40:31 PM
http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1348 (http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1348)

Huh.

I also read an article a while back stating that the movie takes place 22 years after the events of JP3. Wonder if it's just a load of crap.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Dec 15, 2013, 04:56:06 AM
22 years after the events of the first film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dark Passenger on Dec 15, 2013, 07:03:13 AM
Should they have more aquatic dinosaurs? wouldn't surprise me if they'll have those up their sleeves...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 15, 2013, 08:11:49 AM
There are no known aquatic dinosaurs, though a good number could swim. Unless you count the ones who spent their time hunting fish on the river shore.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Dec 15, 2013, 08:13:09 AM
I think he's just referring to the misconception that the large marine life at the time were also dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 15, 2013, 08:15:14 AM
I know.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Dec 15, 2013, 08:19:31 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgyazo.com%2F43f8df4ae260ea0493069d4df33d5c8f.png&hash=64e8d225cee5a493eabbe73c599a5d475ac66c1b)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 15, 2013, 08:24:34 AM
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.history.com%2Fsites%2F4%2F2013%2F05%2F2071234576sam-neill.jpg&hash=5ed7d27e229e5d622195a32b12e80d9c78d6b589)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Powerloader on Dec 15, 2013, 08:28:54 AM
If Sam Neil isn't in this, I'm not watching it.  Jurassic Park 2 sucked because no Sam Neil!!!  (I like Jeff Goldblum but he couldn't carry the film on his own).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Dec 15, 2013, 12:24:35 PM
Quote from: Powerloader on Dec 15, 2013, 08:28:54 AM
If Sam Neil isn't in this, I'm not watching it. Jurassic Park 2 sucked because no Sam Neil!!!  (I like Jeff Goldblum but he couldn't carry the film on his own).

This can't be serious...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Dec 15, 2013, 12:25:55 PM
Read the rest of his posts, dude's serious.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 16, 2013, 10:42:05 AM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/1501780_560087847409535_934096032_n.jpg)

Have I ever said how much I just f**king love the Raptors from the second film?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Dec 16, 2013, 10:48:28 AM
Man, I used to replay the Velociraptor parts on my The Lost World VHS tape allll the time as a little kid. 

"Don't go into the long grass!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Dec 16, 2013, 11:56:54 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Dec 15, 2013, 08:11:49 AM
There are no known aquatic dinosaurs, though a good number could swim. Unless you count the ones who spent their time hunting fish on the river shore.

yes there are. They made a documentary about them.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww2.fi.edu%2Ftheater%2Ffranklintheater%2Fimages%2Fsea-rex.jpg&hash=8351c4d2daedb85b78f1da244821fb61d649b6a6)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 16, 2013, 12:07:01 PM
Oh silly me. How could I forget?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dark Passenger on Dec 16, 2013, 01:51:23 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Dec 15, 2013, 08:13:09 AM
I think he's just referring to the misconception that the large marine life at the time were also dinosaurs.

Yeah that's my bad, considering I'm a huge fan of dinosaurs I'm a little embarrassed I made such a mistake.
Just a little rusty on my palaeontology..
Still though do you guys think Ingen would have cloned prehistoric marine life? I wouldn't put it past them..but I could be wrong
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 16, 2013, 02:34:03 PM
Where would they get the blood from? Unless mosquitoes suddenly became aquatic...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 16, 2013, 02:59:16 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 16, 2013, 02:34:03 PM
Where would they get the blood from? Unless mosquitoes suddenly became aquatic...

Good point.  I do remember, though, that in the first book, they tried to retrieve some of the DNA from the fossilized bones.  Not sure what would be left though.



Quote from: Omegazilla on Dec 16, 2013, 10:42:05 AM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/1501780_560087847409535_934096032_n.jpg)

Have I ever said how much I just f**king love the Raptors from the second film?

:o

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Dec 16, 2013, 03:12:01 PM
It could be theoretically possible to clone a marine reptile, within the blood-sucked-DNA-geologically-preserved world of Jurassic Park. It'd require the animal to come close to the shore, and ideally into a mangrove swamp type of area (where parasitic insects are particularly common). That may have happened - many species of sharks enter estuaries and swamps to give birth in a shallow, food-rich, creche-like environment. Dolphins prefer to give birth in shallow water too, and need to stay near the surface for extended periods when they do.

Given that marine reptiles all needed to surface to breathe, there would have been opportunities for parasites. The question is whether they could break through tough, scaly skin (which in the world of Jurassic Park they can) and whether they could tolerate brief submersion or detach at water level.

Trouble is, they all reproduced by live birth, not by eggs. It'd make them very difficult to recreate, even if you had the DNA - what has a uterus equipped to handle a huge swimming reptile?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Dec 16, 2013, 03:20:20 PM
"Artificial Wombs" much like the ones in Splice.

Science... finds a way.
http://beforeitsnews.com/science-and-technology/2013/10/the-artificial-womb-is-born-and-the-world-of-the-matrix-begins-2647320.html (http://beforeitsnews.com/science-and-technology/2013/10/the-artificial-womb-is-born-and-the-world-of-the-matrix-begins-2647320.html)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 16, 2013, 03:22:07 PM
Even for Jurassic Park, Vertigo, that sounds like a bit much. It could've worked, up until you mentioned the last point about live birth.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 16, 2013, 03:25:01 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Dec 16, 2013, 03:12:01 PM
It could be theoretically possible to clone a marine reptile, within the blood-sucked-DNA-geologically-preserved world of Jurassic Park. It'd require the animal to come close to the shore, and ideally into a mangrove swamp type of area (where parasitic insects are particularly common). That may have happened - many species of sharks enter estuaries and swamps to give birth in a shallow, food-rich, creche-like environment. Dolphins prefer to give birth in shallow water too, and need to stay near the surface for extended periods when they do.

Given that marine reptiles all needed to surface to breathe, there would have been opportunities for parasites. The question is whether they could break through tough, scaly skin (which in the world of Jurassic Park they can) and whether they could tolerate brief submersion or detach at water level.

Trouble is, they all reproduced by live birth, not by eggs. It'd make them very difficult to recreate, even if you had the DNA - what has a uterus equipped to handle a huge swimming reptile?

In that case, they may just genetically alter the anatomy of a current dinosaur they have in the engineering process to better fit the iealized look and behavior of a marine reptile (also discussed in the first book when Wu was unsure of the dinosaur's current abilities - stating them as being "too real")
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 16, 2013, 03:35:52 PM
It won't be a marine reptile then as we know them (mosasaur, plesiosaur, etc...). It would just be a dinosaur that has been made to live in the water. Unless I misunderstood you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 16, 2013, 03:38:30 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 16, 2013, 03:35:52 PM
It won't be a marine reptile then as we know them (mosasaur, plesiosaur, etc...). It would just be a dinosaur that has been made to live in the water. Unless I misunderstood you.

No, that's basically my point - and that's the problem.  It will be a tough nut to crack believably if that's where this new movie wants to take us.

Anywho, I feel like if we do have marine reptiles in this outing, they'll probably treat the main sequence for it in the same way they did for the pteranadon aviary scene in JPIII.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Dec 16, 2013, 03:48:17 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Dec 16, 2013, 10:42:05 AM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/1501780_560087847409535_934096032_n.jpg)

Have I ever said how much I just f**king love the Raptors from the second film?

And you chose a picture of one right before its death by gymnastics. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 16, 2013, 04:02:24 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Dec 16, 2013, 03:38:30 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 16, 2013, 03:35:52 PM
It won't be a marine reptile then as we know them (mosasaur, plesiosaur, etc...). It would just be a dinosaur that has been made to live in the water. Unless I misunderstood you.

No, that's basically my point - and that's the problem.  It will be a tough nut to crack believably if that's where this new movie wants to take us.

Anywho, I feel like if we do have marine reptiles in this outing, they'll probably treat the main sequence for it in the same way they did for the pteranadon aviary scene in JPIII.

I could go for that. A river crossing sequence with a mosasaur in tow could be awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Dec 16, 2013, 04:57:11 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 16, 2013, 03:22:07 PM
It could've worked, up until you mentioned the last point about live birth.

Still might be possible. It apparently doesn't take much to switch between the non-calcified eggs that reptiles lay, and having live birth. In some cases reptiles of the same species are able to do both. So it may be possible to develop a normally live-birthed reptile species in some form of an egg, providing nutrients from a yolk, and moisture and respiration through a soft, porous shell.

Emphasis on the "may", but then Jurassic Park is built on ultra-tenuous science.



Going back a bit, about the subject of aquatic dinosaurs, you could throw that label at spinosaurids. There's good evidence that some of them spent a majority of their time submerged.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 16, 2013, 05:12:40 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Dec 16, 2013, 03:48:17 PM
And you chose a picture of one right before its death by gymnastics. ;)
Nah, that's the actor.

Cause you know. They used real dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 16, 2013, 05:32:04 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Dec 16, 2013, 04:57:11 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 16, 2013, 03:22:07 PM
It could've worked, up until you mentioned the last point about live birth.
Going back a bit, about the subject of aquatic dinosaurs, you could throw that label at spinosaurids. There's good evidence that some of them spent a majority of their time submerged.

Interesting idea but it's still a bit misleading because the label 'aquatic dinosaur' implies that it lives in water. Spending lots of time in water isn't the same as actually living in it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Dec 16, 2013, 05:36:02 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 16, 2013, 05:32:04 PMInteresting idea but it's still a bit misleading because the label 'aquatic dinosaur' implies that it lives in water. Spending lots of time in water isn't the same as actually living in it.

Well, the water-based component of their lives was probably analogous to that of hippos and crocodiles. But I agree, it's an important distinction, and "amphibious" is more appropriate. I was bringing it up as a related curio more than anything else.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 16, 2013, 06:15:13 PM
Amphibious would still be inappropriate, IMO. A reptile by nature is not amphibious. That's why a distinction is made between amphibians and reptiles.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Dec 16, 2013, 11:42:04 PM
You don't have to be an amphibian to be amphibious.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dark Passenger on Dec 17, 2013, 12:05:57 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 16, 2013, 02:34:03 PM
Where would they get the blood from? Unless mosquitoes suddenly became aquatic...

Well...you know what they say "Life finds a way.."  :laugh:
In all seriousness though, you're right it would be very difficult but I don't think it's impossible.
I mean this is Ingen we're talking about, I doubt we've seen everything they have hidden up their sleeves..

Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 16, 2013, 04:02:24 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Dec 16, 2013, 03:38:30 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 16, 2013, 03:35:52 PM
It won't be a marine reptile then as we know them (mosasaur, plesiosaur, etc...). It would just be a dinosaur that has been made to live in the water. Unless I misunderstood you.

No, that's basically my point - and that's the problem.  It will be a tough nut to crack believably if that's where this new movie wants to take us.

Anywho, I feel like if we do have marine reptiles in this outing, they'll probably treat the main sequence for it in the same way they did for the pteranadon aviary scene in JPIII.

I could go for that. A river crossing sequence with a mosasaur in tow could be awesome.

I agree, I wouldn't want it to be the main antagonist but a chase sequence or something of the sort would be nice.
Also people have mentioned a dinosaur that could be semi-aquatic, I like the idea but I guess we've already gotten that with the Spinosaurus? something else would be nice but I don't want to see the same stuff again..just my two cents
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenodog on Dec 17, 2013, 12:17:56 AM
They barely utilised spino as an aquatic species I.M.O.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dark Passenger on Dec 17, 2013, 12:21:26 AM
Quote from: Xenodog on Dec 17, 2013, 12:17:56 AM
They barely utilised spino as an aquatic species I.M.O.

That is true, I wouldn't mind seeing more if they did it in a new and clever way..
Although if they did bring him back again I personally don't want him to be the main antagonist just because it's a bit of "been there done that"...just my opinion though
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Dec 17, 2013, 12:37:07 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 16, 2013, 06:15:13 PM
Amphibious would still be inappropriate, IMO. A reptile by nature is not amphibious. That's why a distinction is made between amphibians and reptiles.
As a Class, perhaps. As a term, it is perfectly appropriate.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dark Passenger on Dec 17, 2013, 12:38:44 AM
Quote from: Gate on Dec 17, 2013, 12:37:07 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 16, 2013, 06:15:13 PM
Amphibious would still be inappropriate, IMO. A reptile by nature is not amphibious. That's why a distinction is made between amphibians and reptiles.
As a Class, perhaps. As a term, it is perfectly appropriate.

I agree, tell that to the Crocodile...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 17, 2013, 01:11:41 AM
Remember the mosasaurs from Dinotopia?



(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcinedat.org%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fbilder%2Fjurassic-park_behind-the-scenes_01505.jpg&hash=a108878ba00864ffa6d7b2e32ea62271178c7382)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcinedat.org%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fbilder%2Fjurassic-park_behind-the-scenes_00006.jpg&hash=81f4333ce79fd4fb48a064b033c9e46de6171a26)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcinedat.org%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fbilder%2Fjurassic-park_behind-the-scenes_02276.jpg&hash=19345a31d3ff5e3f6c62d662d340cf4dbcbd231d)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcinedat.org%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fbilder%2Fjurassic-park_behind-the-scenes_01489.jpg&hash=cd84eb42310c028d9d21e2b5a94a373d45142d82)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcinedat.org%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fbilder%2Fjurassic-park_behind-the-scenes_01960.jpg&hash=90439efa47c0b703536c2160d712704733cae948)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcinedat.org%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fbilder%2Fjurassic-park_behind-the-scenes_00017.jpg&hash=ad5375d86906dd4e7c21808023a10461028dfa3c)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcinedat.org%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fbilder%2Fjurassic-park_behind-the-scenes_00016.jpg&hash=049fb857aa270959cef5143c043b08b0ff997724)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcinedat.org%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fbilder%2Fjurassic-park_behind-the-scenes_00089.jpg&hash=48b028fa707769935ce1b27a0f4f35bd849e5c91)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Dec 17, 2013, 07:10:26 AM
Yes they are aquatic Dinos and so are plesiosaurs ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 17, 2013, 09:14:12 AM
Oh yes. I heard Goannas are tortoises, too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 17, 2013, 12:35:12 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Dec 16, 2013, 11:42:04 PM
You don't have to be an amphibian to be amphibious.

True. I'm being pedantic :P

Anyway, I had a buttload of goodies arrive last night and have some fresh pics for y'all. Some rare Series II action figures along with a prop replica I've wanted since I was a wee lad 8)

http://instagram.com/p/h_xxbiFEjW/ (http://instagram.com/p/h_xxbiFEjW/)
http://instagram.com/p/h_yTGeFEkS/ (http://instagram.com/p/h_yTGeFEkS/)
http://instagram.com/p/h_ysNNlEk6/ (http://instagram.com/p/h_ysNNlEk6/)
http://instagram.com/p/h_zpTJFEmX/ (http://instagram.com/p/h_zpTJFEmX/)
http://instagram.com/p/h_1JPoFEoj/ (http://instagram.com/p/h_1JPoFEoj/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bender1988 on Dec 17, 2013, 03:32:57 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 17, 2013, 12:35:12 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Dec 16, 2013, 11:42:04 PM
You don't have to be an amphibian to be amphibious.

True. I'm being pedantic :P

Anyway, I had a buttload of goodies arrive last night and have some fresh pics for y'all. Some rare Series II action figures along with a prop replica I've wanted since I was a wee lad 8)

http://instagram.com/p/h_xxbiFEjW/ (http://instagram.com/p/h_xxbiFEjW/)
http://instagram.com/p/h_yTGeFEkS/ (http://instagram.com/p/h_yTGeFEkS/)
http://instagram.com/p/h_ysNNlEk6/ (http://instagram.com/p/h_ysNNlEk6/)
http://instagram.com/p/h_zpTJFEmX/ (http://instagram.com/p/h_zpTJFEmX/)
http://instagram.com/p/h_1JPoFEoj/ (http://instagram.com/p/h_1JPoFEoj/)
That shaving cream/dna holster looks extremely badass
I once had the opportunity to buy t-rex figure from JP
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fecx.images-amazon.com%2Fimages%2FI%2F41N%252BMl%252BK2sL.jpg&hash=0636fdc5e832aaeb9d5550957f938cdc267811cb)
[close]
For my birthday but I chosed something diffrent
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.retroactionfigures.com%2Fimages%2FCIMG2592.JPG&hash=b227b98be423845878107b657c321b9e392e28fe)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 17, 2013, 03:54:07 PM
Oh *sigh*, I used to have that Godzilla toy...in mint, working condition too. Don't ask me why I pitched it :-[
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Dec 17, 2013, 05:14:01 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 17, 2013, 12:35:12 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Dec 16, 2013, 11:42:04 PM
You don't have to be an amphibian to be amphibious.

True. I'm being pedantic :P

Anyway, I had a buttload of goodies arrive last night and have some fresh pics for y'all. Some rare Series II action figures along with a prop replica I've wanted since I was a wee lad 8)

http://instagram.com/p/h_xxbiFEjW/ (http://instagram.com/p/h_xxbiFEjW/)
http://instagram.com/p/h_yTGeFEkS/ (http://instagram.com/p/h_yTGeFEkS/)
http://instagram.com/p/h_ysNNlEk6/ (http://instagram.com/p/h_ysNNlEk6/)
http://instagram.com/p/h_zpTJFEmX/ (http://instagram.com/p/h_zpTJFEmX/)
http://instagram.com/p/h_1JPoFEoj/ (http://instagram.com/p/h_1JPoFEoj/)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.saneracamp.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F04%2FNice-4753674243_a96ddb71b0-225x300.jpg&hash=cefb565dceac7fdefbe958824984b3c97475e8f9)

I remember eating the cereal, did your box roar?!?!  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 17, 2013, 05:28:35 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 17, 2013, 12:35:12 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Dec 16, 2013, 11:42:04 PM
You don't have to be an amphibian to be amphibious.

True. I'm being pedantic :P

Anyway, I had a buttload of goodies arrive last night and have some fresh pics for y'all. Some rare Series II action figures along with a prop replica I've wanted since I was a wee lad 8)

http://instagram.com/p/h_xxbiFEjW/ (http://instagram.com/p/h_xxbiFEjW/)
http://instagram.com/p/h_yTGeFEkS/ (http://instagram.com/p/h_yTGeFEkS/)
http://instagram.com/p/h_ysNNlEk6/ (http://instagram.com/p/h_ysNNlEk6/)
http://instagram.com/p/h_zpTJFEmX/ (http://instagram.com/p/h_zpTJFEmX/)
http://instagram.com/p/h_1JPoFEoj/ (http://instagram.com/p/h_1JPoFEoj/)

Sonofa gun!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 17, 2013, 05:34:29 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Dec 17, 2013, 05:14:01 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 17, 2013, 12:35:12 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Dec 16, 2013, 11:42:04 PM
You don't have to be an amphibian to be amphibious.

True. I'm being pedantic :P

Anyway, I had a buttload of goodies arrive last night and have some fresh pics for y'all. Some rare Series II action figures along with a prop replica I've wanted since I was a wee lad 8)

http://instagram.com/p/h_xxbiFEjW/ (http://instagram.com/p/h_xxbiFEjW/)
http://instagram.com/p/h_yTGeFEkS/ (http://instagram.com/p/h_yTGeFEkS/)
http://instagram.com/p/h_ysNNlEk6/ (http://instagram.com/p/h_ysNNlEk6/)
http://instagram.com/p/h_zpTJFEmX/ (http://instagram.com/p/h_zpTJFEmX/)
http://instagram.com/p/h_1JPoFEoj/ (http://instagram.com/p/h_1JPoFEoj/)
http://www.saneracamp.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Nice-4753674243_a96ddb71b0-225x300.jpg

I remember eating the cereal, did your box roar?!?!  :D

You honestly think I opened it?

P.S. there are more cryocans available dude, if you still want one! Cereal too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 17, 2013, 06:48:57 PM
Found these on deviantart.  Can't wait to see what vehicles Jurassic World will bring.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc01.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2Ff%2F2010%2F046%2Fe%2F0%2FJurassic_Park_Explorer_by_lupin3ITA.jpg&hash=7de669a736365f650109bf12368d03b4e8141e23)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc00.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2Ff%2F2010%2F047%2F2%2F8%2FJeep_Jurassic_Park_by_lupin3ITA.jpg&hash=f831fb452999b8397bd1665582a8f3bec85d4ba0)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc00.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2Ff%2F2011%2F066%2Ff%2F5%2Fmercedes_benz_w163_cabrio_jp_by_lupin3ita-d3b3xif.jpg&hash=7feca181f5d34e20793ce77d307d0bfc3c339a4f)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc00.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2Ff%2F2011%2F066%2F4%2Fb%2Fmercedes_benz_w163__jp_by_lupin3ita-d3b3xf9.jpg&hash=4c4ac6d65dbea9ccd8da8ebc8fdbd123702ed630)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc03.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2Ff%2F2011%2F066%2F9%2F8%2Fflletwood_rv_moible_command_by_lupin3ita-d3b3xrm.jpg&hash=55a686237d1fa40961366aa3693854897d22b4fa)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Dec 17, 2013, 07:12:11 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dT6uVAHOZY# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dT6uVAHOZY#)

Totally forgot how orgasmic 2:10-2:50 is.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 17, 2013, 07:18:15 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Dec 17, 2013, 07:12:11 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dT6uVAHOZY# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dT6uVAHOZY#)

Totally forgot how orgasmic 2:10-2:50 is.

Can you please make a video montage with that track?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Dec 17, 2013, 07:24:51 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Dec 17, 2013, 07:18:15 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Dec 17, 2013, 07:12:11 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dT6uVAHOZY# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dT6uVAHOZY#)

Totally forgot how orgasmic 2:10-2:50 is.

Can you please make a video montage with that track?

I might be giving the JP trilogy a shot in the near future...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Dec 18, 2013, 07:40:26 AM
Colin Trevorrow @colintrevorrow
Welcome back, Phil. pic.twitter.com/pnGcKAlfN5

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bbu1QEdCAAAb-hX.jpg:large)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Dec 18, 2013, 08:12:11 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Dec 18, 2013, 07:40:26 AM
Colin Trevorrow @colintrevorrow
Welcome back, Phil. pic.twitter.com/pnGcKAlfN5

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bbu1QEdCAAAb-hX.jpg:large)

Am I just seeing things or is this Richard Attenborough? ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 18, 2013, 12:00:39 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Dec 18, 2013, 07:40:26 AM
Colin Trevorrow @colintrevorrow
Welcome back, Phil. pic.twitter.com/pnGcKAlfN5

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bbu1QEdCAAAb-hX.jpg:large)
Fantastic!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Dec 18, 2013, 12:09:33 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Dec 18, 2013, 07:40:26 AM
Colin Trevorrow @colintrevorrow
Welcome back, Phil. pic.twitter.com/pnGcKAlfN5

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bbu1QEdCAAAb-hX.jpg:large)
Wonderful picture. I really hope his work's influence can be felt as it was in the first two films.

Quote from: Shasvre on Dec 18, 2013, 08:12:11 AM
Am I just seeing things or is this Richard Attenborough? ;D
Sir, that is Phil Tippett.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 18, 2013, 12:25:55 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Dec 18, 2013, 07:40:26 AM
Colin Trevorrow @colintrevorrow
Welcome back, Phil. pic.twitter.com/pnGcKAlfN5

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bbu1QEdCAAAb-hX.jpg:large)

Please give us a T.Rex with proper body proportions...actually, do that for all the dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 18, 2013, 03:37:30 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Dec 18, 2013, 12:09:33 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Dec 18, 2013, 07:40:26 AM
Colin Trevorrow @colintrevorrow
Welcome back, Phil. pic.twitter.com/pnGcKAlfN5

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bbu1QEdCAAAb-hX.jpg:large)
Wonderful picture. I really hope his work's influence can be felt as it was in the first two films.

Quote from: Shasvre on Dec 18, 2013, 08:12:11 AM
Am I just seeing things or is this Richard Attenborough? ;D
Sir, that is Phil Tippett.

Lol!

This is great!  Yes!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Dec 18, 2013, 03:47:02 PM
Let's just hope he can supervise the dinos properly for once. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Dec 18, 2013, 06:14:36 PM
f**k yes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Dec 18, 2013, 08:07:48 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Dec 18, 2013, 12:09:33 PMSir, that is Phil Tippett.

Never heard of, to be honest.

Am I the only one seeing the Attenborough behind that beard? :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Dec 18, 2013, 08:09:23 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Dec 18, 2013, 08:07:48 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Dec 18, 2013, 12:09:33 PMSir, that is Phil Tippett.

Never heard of, to be honest.

Am I the only one seeing the Attenborough behind that beard? :D

He's the "Dinosaur Supervisor." You know, the meme?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 18, 2013, 08:10:20 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Dec 18, 2013, 08:07:48 PM
Never heard of, to be honest.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fphilipedwards.files.wordpress.com%2F2012%2F10%2Fyou_had_one_job.png%3Fw%3D492%26amp%3Bh%3D268&hash=29e57ab1ba6363572291d6a9ada99acbd0627bc0)

Quote from: Shasvre on Dec 18, 2013, 08:07:48 PM
Am I the only one seeing the Attenborough behind that beard? :D

Now that you mention it, it does look like a bigger version of Attenborough's :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Dec 18, 2013, 08:10:34 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Dec 18, 2013, 08:09:23 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Dec 18, 2013, 08:07:48 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Dec 18, 2013, 12:09:33 PMSir, that is Phil Tippett.

Never heard of, to be honest.

Am I the only one seeing the Attenborough behind that beard? :D

He's the "Dinosaur Supervisor." You know, the meme?

I was about to type "No.", but yeah, I remember that one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 18, 2013, 08:13:43 PM
He's done a ton of great effects work. Always love the shots of him with the Hoth stuff from The Empire Strikes Back:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-BDU1nxGXpTs%2FTqjdi1-xUNI%2FAAAAAAAABXs%2F3qbU6eocQ2E%2Fs1600%2FAt-At_tippett.jpg&hash=70612f417dfccb7eba574314080d7b3acb7d35f2)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmediocrityisthenewgenius.files.wordpress.com%2F2012%2F06%2F32philtauntaun.jpg&hash=80404d9b37eaeb89376686f739411cfa1343d310)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 18, 2013, 08:13:58 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Dec 18, 2013, 08:07:48 PM
Never heard of, to be honest.
wat
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Dec 18, 2013, 09:08:22 PM
That man directed the movie you despise Omega.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 18, 2013, 09:12:39 PM
I know.


I KNOW.


Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages2.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20130817005521%2Fdegrassi%2Fimages%2F5%2F51%2FLie_down_try_not_to_cry_cry_a_lot_cleaned_525.jpg&hash=42e86b4cf288597b7a54b6880037768847ea92a0)
Spoiler
Still he's one of the most awesome guys in the cinema industry. Despite that abomination he directed (which is due more to script, anyway) he has brought to the screen so many great characters and I love him for that. And he's great.
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Dec 18, 2013, 09:19:30 PM
I was going to ask what movie but then I thought back.

...Oh. :-X
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Dec 18, 2013, 10:23:57 PM
Should I ask, or should I just check IMDb?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Dec 18, 2013, 10:29:57 PM
Ask yourself, are you doing your part?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Dec 18, 2013, 10:45:43 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Dec 18, 2013, 10:29:57 PM
Ask yourself, are you doing your part?

Uh... yes?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Dec 18, 2013, 10:46:20 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Dec 18, 2013, 10:45:43 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Dec 18, 2013, 10:29:57 PM
Ask yourself, are you doing your part?

Uh... yes?

Spoiler
Starship Troopers 2
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Dec 18, 2013, 10:47:07 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Dec 18, 2013, 10:46:20 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Dec 18, 2013, 10:45:43 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Dec 18, 2013, 10:29:57 PM
Ask yourself, are you doing your part?

Uh... yes?

Spoiler
Starship Troopers 2
[close]

Oh

Spoiler
I keep forgetting they made sequels to that.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 18, 2013, 10:50:43 PM
THEY DIDN'T


(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F-vfO8wsuTUsE%2FUNx1hQOkWCI%2FAAAAAAAAAQI%2FkFz_9FwYvZ8%2Fs1600%2FGollum-Smeagol-smeagol-gollum-14076882-960-403.jpg&hash=55411a97e3f5efaae9c3cec78e3866b3f34d430b)


THEY DIDNNNN'T
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Dec 18, 2013, 10:53:34 PM
THEY DID, PRECIOUS. THEY DID.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.arsenalamerica.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2010%2F10%2Fgollum.gif&hash=c8d3daed333068755b515ca1a449c9534d2110be)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Dec 18, 2013, 10:57:38 PM
I actually liked Starship Troopers 2, more-so than the first even.


But damn that third film sucked.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 18, 2013, 10:58:45 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Dec 18, 2013, 10:53:34 PM
THEY DID, PRECIOUS. THEY DID.

http://www.arsenalamerica.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/gollum.gif
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FGVj7Sj7.jpg&hash=351afe99683a7cebd2f7f3d254c88b0ae3632cb0)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Dec 18, 2013, 11:10:54 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Dec 18, 2013, 10:57:38 PM
I actually liked Starship Troopers 2,

Impossible.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Dec 18, 2013, 11:11:31 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Dec 18, 2013, 10:57:38 PM
I actually liked Starship Troopers 2, more-so than the first even.


But damn that third film sucked.

If there's any good to come out of it, I got to see Kelly Carlson nekked.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Dec 18, 2013, 11:34:02 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Dec 18, 2013, 11:10:54 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Dec 18, 2013, 10:57:38 PM
I actually liked Starship Troopers 2,

Impossible.
I haven't even seen the first.  :-X
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Dec 18, 2013, 11:35:36 PM
There's the door.

Get the f**k out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Dec 18, 2013, 11:38:54 PM
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F24.media.tumblr.com%2Fe52505f1fb5d53bf962bf2df7691996c%2Ftumblr_minzmwdymM1qfjo8oo1_500.gif&hash=4a9bd1de8423b13fcb6d79fb8de5ce574517fb9e)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Dec 18, 2013, 11:39:32 PM
jizz
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 19, 2013, 04:23:55 AM
I've never seen this pic of the queen before....

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fww4.hdnux.com%2Fphotos%2F20%2F64%2F70%2F4410891%2F6%2F960x595.jpg&hash=2def1c692747e139bed0887459bf3a083d355188)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 19, 2013, 04:27:07 AM
It looks awfully tiny in that image.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 19, 2013, 04:29:40 AM
A little bit, but the out-of-focus of her neck in the background helps a bit with the scale.

Also, this is a pretty creepy and realistic shot of the matriarch from JPIII...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.screenrant.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fjurassic-world-set-20-years-after-jurassic-park.png&hash=23accee693280b52d7de9e7071767299de4845a7)

She had a great persona in the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Dec 19, 2013, 05:04:21 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Dec 19, 2013, 04:29:40 AM
A little bit, but the out-of-focus of her neck in the background helps a bit with the scale.

Also, this is a pretty creepy and realistic shot of the matriarch from JPIII...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.screenrant.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fjurassic-world-set-20-years-after-jurassic-park.png&hash=23accee693280b52d7de9e7071767299de4845a7)

She had a great persona in the film.
Wanna be like the brotha with a claw to da back? Gimme my eggz, human b!tches!!! ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 19, 2013, 08:57:09 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Dec 19, 2013, 04:23:55 AM
I've never seen this pic of the queen before....

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fww4.hdnux.com%2Fphotos%2F20%2F64%2F70%2F4410891%2F6%2F960x595.jpg&hash=2def1c692747e139bed0887459bf3a083d355188)
Fantastic find!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Dec 19, 2013, 09:07:28 AM
Quote from: Cal427eb on Dec 18, 2013, 11:34:02 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Dec 18, 2013, 11:10:54 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Dec 18, 2013, 10:57:38 PM
I actually liked Starship Troopers 2,

Impossible.
I haven't even seen the first.  :-X

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.imfdb.org%2Fimages%2Fthumb%2F1%2F10%2FST-Sniper04A.jpg%2F500px-ST-Sniper04A.jpg&hash=4ad2cd8a0e7888cbf53c8d2c807ae3db434a68e6)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 19, 2013, 12:35:58 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Dec 19, 2013, 04:29:40 AM
A little bit, but the out-of-focus of her neck in the background helps a bit with the scale.

Also, this is a pretty creepy and realistic shot of the matriarch from JPIII...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.screenrant.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fjurassic-world-set-20-years-after-jurassic-park.png&hash=23accee693280b52d7de9e7071767299de4845a7)

She had a great persona in the film.

The Velociraptors looked great in JP 3. I think Stan Winston Studios did a great job of tweaking their design.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Dec 19, 2013, 12:38:53 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Dec 19, 2013, 04:29:40 AM
A little bit, but the out-of-focus of her neck in the background helps a bit with the scale.

Also, this is a pretty creepy and realistic shot of the matriarch from JPIII...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.screenrant.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fjurassic-world-set-20-years-after-jurassic-park.png&hash=23accee693280b52d7de9e7071767299de4845a7)

She had a great persona in the film.

I always loved that shot.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 19, 2013, 03:20:00 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 19, 2013, 12:35:58 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Dec 19, 2013, 04:29:40 AM
A little bit, but the out-of-focus of her neck in the background helps a bit with the scale.

Also, this is a pretty creepy and realistic shot of the matriarch from JPIII...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.screenrant.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fjurassic-world-set-20-years-after-jurassic-park.png&hash=23accee693280b52d7de9e7071767299de4845a7)

She had a great persona in the film.

The Velociraptors looked great in JP 3. I think Stan Winston Studios did a great job of tweaking their design.

You know what?  Now that I think of it, the only dinos that had animatronic stand-ins were the carnivores: Spinosaurus, Tyrannosaurus, Velociraptor and Pteranadon.  And T-Rex and Pteranadon were brief as hell.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 19, 2013, 03:30:49 PM
Not entirely. The Brachiosaurus did as well; so did the Triceratops.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 19, 2013, 03:33:47 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 19, 2013, 03:30:49 PM
Not entirely. The Brachiosaurus did as well; so did the Triceratops.

Not in JPIII.

I just hope they don't pull off that ish with Jurassic World.  They better have been building animatronics this whole time!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 19, 2013, 04:22:15 PM
I wouldn't be surprised if they just recycled the old ones.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 19, 2013, 06:36:54 PM
If they were still around, considering they pretty much obliterated the T-Rex during the filming of the Spino fight.



Just finished making another teaser....

(https://scontent-a-iad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/1461770_10200721076260734_1199199002_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Dec 19, 2013, 11:41:33 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Dec 19, 2013, 06:36:54 PM
Just finished making another teaser....

https://scontent-a-iad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/1461770_10200721076260734_1199199002_n.jpg

(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSl56Zs1spumEJoWg4ltNBemMOjMh6GuEmEzan2vjPHLvZswmzz1w)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RoaryUK on Dec 20, 2013, 12:59:17 AM

Just came across this doing the rounds on Facebook, apparently it's the official teaser poster for Jurassic World in 2015, only in low res for whatever reason... anyone else know about it??
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Dec 20, 2013, 01:00:07 AM
Yes, unfortunately.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RoaryUK on Dec 20, 2013, 01:07:56 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Dec 20, 2013, 01:00:07 AM
Yes, unfortunately.

Why is that?  Is there something I should know about this film, haven't really being keeping up on it lately?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Dec 20, 2013, 02:19:31 AM
Quote from: RoaryUK on Dec 20, 2013, 01:07:56 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Dec 20, 2013, 01:00:07 AM
Yes, unfortunately.

Why is that?  Is there something I should know about this film, haven't really being keeping up on it lately?


...you're saying you haven't seen the teaser trailer yet? :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Dec 20, 2013, 03:54:43 AM
Don't listen to him, roary.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Dec 20, 2013, 04:44:40 AM
Sorry man but sersiously where have you been Roary ?

That thing has done the rounds for months now.

and its not a poster really its just showing off the logo, posters dont scale that way.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RoaryUK on Dec 20, 2013, 08:26:32 AM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Dec 20, 2013, 04:44:40 AM
Sorry man but sersiously where have you been Roary ?

That thing has done the rounds for months now.

and its not a poster really its just showing off the logo, posters dont scale that way.

I didn't say it was the official poster I merely posed the question.  But according to every source I read about it since, this only came out yesterday. Also what does scale have to do with this image?  We don't know anything about this movie yet, it probably isn't even the whole thing.  ::)

Source: http://www.dreadcentral.com/news/72913/first-jurassic-world-teaser-poster-arrives#axzz2nyJLDrhR (http://www.dreadcentral.com/news/72913/first-jurassic-world-teaser-poster-arrives#axzz2nyJLDrhR)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 20, 2013, 01:33:37 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Dec 19, 2013, 06:36:54 PM
If they were still around, considering they pretty much obliterated the T-Rex during the filming of the Spino fight.



Just finished making another teaser....

https://scontent-a-iad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/1461770_10200721076260734_1199199002_n.jpg

If they felt they were going to make another movie, I doubt they'd get rid of them. I don't imagine it's cheap to make giant animatronics.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 20, 2013, 02:12:30 PM
Big animatronics were recycled. That's why they went all out with them at the end of the production of the third film. Rex was beheaded. Only the heads remain, I think.

If anything they can build new ones based on the old moulds.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Dec 20, 2013, 03:15:27 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Dec 19, 2013, 06:36:54 PM
Just finished making another teaser....

https://scontent-a-iad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/1461770_10200721076260734_1199199002_n.jpg

I saw you post this on Twitter. Good work dude. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Dec 21, 2013, 10:15:18 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Dec 18, 2013, 11:35:36 PM
There's the door.

Get the f**k out.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.pandawhale.com%2F81198-Jennifer-Lawrence-f%2A%2Ak-YEAH-gi-26Rc.gif&hash=874556bec4e595e399b0d90c4f954efc15aeb3ca)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wearysloth.com%2FGallery%2FActorsI%2F8529-23782.jpg&hash=b28e8ad77417080589cb989f5320b3013fd8cad0)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.starship-troopers.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F12%2FRasczak1.jpg&hash=1c143386c15091fa8442445bf0fcaccf864ded3d)
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Dec 21, 2013, 11:20:55 AM
Quote from: RagingDragon on Dec 21, 2013, 10:15:18 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Dec 18, 2013, 11:35:36 PM
There's the door.

Get the f**k out.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.pandawhale.com%2F81198-Jennifer-Lawrence-f%2A%2Ak-YEAH-gi-26Rc.gif&hash=874556bec4e595e399b0d90c4f954efc15aeb3ca)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wearysloth.com%2FGallery%2FActorsI%2F8529-23782.jpg&hash=b28e8ad77417080589cb989f5320b3013fd8cad0)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.starship-troopers.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F12%2FRasczak1.jpg&hash=1c143386c15091fa8442445bf0fcaccf864ded3d)
[close]
[close]

Crazy Rich: "Control yourself Cal."

Cal: "I CAN'T, MAYBE YOU SHOULD JUST SHOOT ME!"

Crazy: *aims*

First Blood: "No! He's just a little out of his mind sir!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 21, 2013, 03:07:41 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Dec 20, 2013, 03:15:27 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Dec 19, 2013, 06:36:54 PM
Just finished making another teaser....

https://scontent-a-iad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/1461770_10200721076260734_1199199002_n.jpg

I saw you post this on Twitter. Good work dude. ;)

Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Dec 19, 2013, 11:41:33 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Dec 19, 2013, 06:36:54 PM
Just finished making another teaser....

https://scontent-a-iad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/1461770_10200721076260734_1199199002_n.jpg

(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSl56Zs1spumEJoWg4ltNBemMOjMh6GuEmEzan2vjPHLvZswmzz1w)

Thank you mates!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Elliott on Dec 22, 2013, 03:07:31 PM
Now... I may be a bit late to the party again... but...

Does anyone else think that Jurassic World is just a bigger theme park?

Similar to what Disney does with Disney World and Disney Land?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Dec 22, 2013, 03:25:07 PM
Yes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: T Dog on Dec 22, 2013, 05:51:48 PM
Quote from: Galli on Dec 22, 2013, 03:07:31 PM
Now... I may be a bit late to the party again... but...

Does anyone else think that Jurassic World is just a bigger theme park?

Similar to what Disney does with Disney World and Disney Land?

Yeah I assume it's a theme park rebranding as opposed to a Cadillacs and Dinosaurs styled world.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 22, 2013, 11:20:57 PM
Quote from: Galli on Dec 22, 2013, 03:07:31 PM
Now... I may be a bit late to the party again... but...

Does anyone else think that Jurassic World is just a bigger theme park?

Similar to what Disney does with Disney World and Disney Land?

It's most likely. The big news here though is that this film, IIRC, is a semi-reboot of sorts.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 23, 2013, 09:48:27 AM
Always cracks me up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jMMrRmCLXo# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jMMrRmCLXo#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 23, 2013, 03:48:26 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Dec 23, 2013, 09:48:27 AM
Always cracks me up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jMMrRmCLXo# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jMMrRmCLXo#)

Lolll

My friend and I used to always yell "Grant!" in his voice whenever something stupid happened or when we panicked.

Btw, has everyone seen this gold already?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-w-58hQ9dLk# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-w-58hQ9dLk#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: cloverfan98 on Dec 26, 2013, 05:29:58 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Dec 21, 2013, 03:07:41 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Dec 20, 2013, 03:15:27 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Dec 19, 2013, 06:36:54 PM
Just finished making another teaser....

https://scontent-a-iad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/1461770_10200721076260734_1199199002_n.jpg

I saw you post this on Twitter. Good work dude. ;)

Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Dec 19, 2013, 11:41:33 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Dec 19, 2013, 06:36:54 PM
Just finished making another teaser....

https://scontent-a-iad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/1461770_10200721076260734_1199199002_n.jpg

(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSl56Zs1spumEJoWg4ltNBemMOjMh6GuEmEzan2vjPHLvZswmzz1w)

Thank you mates!

Really great posters man! But I have to ask (and this is for the JP fandom as a whole) what is with the obsession over Nedry's can? It was stated in the film that he had a few hours to get the embryos from the can to a fridge on the ship, so by now or even a few days after the events of the first film the embryos are dead and gone I think.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Dec 26, 2013, 10:47:04 AM
My Coelophysis


(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc03.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2Ff%2F2013%2F360%2F1%2Fb%2Fcoelophysis_by_dilophosaurusalpha-d6zg0xo.png&hash=2b6311d948d8f30dcb80deb2549317b4b3fa41fd)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Dec 26, 2013, 02:37:40 PM
Dig the colours :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 26, 2013, 10:55:32 PM
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the newest meme....

GRANT!

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/1497957_10200757747217485_831668436_o.jpg)

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/1491504_10200757744857426_963061431_o.jpg)

(https://scontent-a-iad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/1545043_10200757745417440_404240723_n.jpg)

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc1/1518984_10200757746257461_607134663_o.jpg)

(https://scontent-a-iad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/t1/1466029_10200757743457391_1933785499_n.jpg)

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/1504471_10200757748377514_1197706206_o.jpg)

(https://scontent-a-iad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc1/1005019_10200757749297537_419446778_n.jpg)

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/1502623_10200757751297587_1877032802_o.jpg)

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/t31/1462782_10200757751857601_1742388015_o.jpg)

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/1537745_10200757753657646_1189575563_o.jpg)

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/965853_10200757754057656_1583883291_o.jpg)

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/1523980_10200757755417690_1343603336_o.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Dec 26, 2013, 10:57:17 PM
We need gifs of this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Dec 27, 2013, 12:06:38 AM
 :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Dec 27, 2013, 12:34:46 AM
Quote from: cloverfan98 on Dec 26, 2013, 05:29:58 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Dec 21, 2013, 03:07:41 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Dec 20, 2013, 03:15:27 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Dec 19, 2013, 06:36:54 PM
Just finished making another teaser....

https://scontent-a-iad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/1461770_10200721076260734_1199199002_n.jpg

I saw you post this on Twitter. Good work dude. ;)

Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Dec 19, 2013, 11:41:33 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Dec 19, 2013, 06:36:54 PM
Just finished making another teaser....

https://scontent-a-iad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/1461770_10200721076260734_1199199002_n.jpg

(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSl56Zs1spumEJoWg4ltNBemMOjMh6GuEmEzan2vjPHLvZswmzz1w)

Thank you mates!

Really great posters man! But I have to ask (and this is for the JP fandom as a whole) what is with the obsession over Nedry's can? It was stated in the film that he had a few hours to get the embryos from the can to a fridge on the ship, so by now or even a few days after the events of the first film the embryos are dead and gone I think.
It is ONLY the most bad ass movie prop ever!








Also you are correct, the embryos would be useless after a couple hours...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Dec 27, 2013, 01:17:36 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Dec 26, 2013, 10:55:32 PM
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the newest meme....

GRANT!

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/1497957_10200757747217485_831668436_o.jpg)

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/1491504_10200757744857426_963061431_o.jpg)

(https://scontent-a-iad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/1545043_10200757745417440_404240723_n.jpg)

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc1/1518984_10200757746257461_607134663_o.jpg)

https://scontent-a-iad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/t1/1466029_10200757743457391_1933785499_n.jpg

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/1504471_10200757748377514_1197706206_o.jpg)

(https://scontent-a-iad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc1/1005019_10200757749297537_419446778_n.jpg)

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/1502623_10200757751297587_1877032802_o.jpg)

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/t31/1462782_10200757751857601_1742388015_o.jpg)

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/1537745_10200757753657646_1189575563_o.jpg)

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/965853_10200757754057656_1583883291_o.jpg)

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/1523980_10200757755417690_1343603336_o.jpg)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1o4H4vc0wyI# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1o4H4vc0wyI#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 27, 2013, 12:21:05 PM
Quote from: cloverfan98 on Dec 26, 2013, 05:29:58 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Dec 21, 2013, 03:07:41 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Dec 20, 2013, 03:15:27 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Dec 19, 2013, 06:36:54 PM
Just finished making another teaser....

https://scontent-a-iad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/1461770_10200721076260734_1199199002_n.jpg

I saw you post this on Twitter. Good work dude. ;)

Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Dec 19, 2013, 11:41:33 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Dec 19, 2013, 06:36:54 PM
Just finished making another teaser....

https://scontent-a-iad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/1461770_10200721076260734_1199199002_n.jpg

(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSl56Zs1spumEJoWg4ltNBemMOjMh6GuEmEzan2vjPHLvZswmzz1w)

Thank you mates!

Really great posters man! But I have to ask (and this is for the JP fandom as a whole) what is with the obsession over Nedry's can? It was stated in the film that he had a few hours to get the embryos from the can to a fridge on the ship, so by now or even a few days after the events of the first film the embryos are dead and gone I think.

For me personally, I think it's one of the most unique props ever created in a movie and in general, as a tool for criminal purposes, it's still quite unique. I also love the clicking sounds it makes when he puts in the embryos inside it...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 27, 2013, 02:53:12 PM
I always like to imagine that the can got washed down a stream and became stuck in some underwater debris in a cold river, but I still think the embryos would die  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Dec 27, 2013, 03:49:44 PM
Embryos are long dead... but the genetic material would still be there to be used. :P That's what makes the CAN an interesting mcguffin... Access to genetic material from all the dinosaurs that were being "brought" back by INGEN... if one can find it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 27, 2013, 06:10:10 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Dec 27, 2013, 03:49:44 PM
Embryos are long dead... but the genetic material would still be there to be used. :P That's what makes the CAN an interesting mcguffin... Access to genetic material from all the dinosaurs that were being "brought" back by INGEN... if one can find it.

yes yes yes
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 28, 2013, 03:17:25 AM
New arrival! Some of the older fans might remember this.

http://instagram.com/p/icKnEFFEm3/ (http://instagram.com/p/icKnEFFEm3/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Dec 28, 2013, 04:25:19 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 28, 2013, 03:17:25 AM
New arrival! Some of the older fans might remember this.

http://instagram.com/p/icKnEFFEm3/ (http://instagram.com/p/icKnEFFEm3/)
I do! Nice pick up, get that thing framed man!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 30, 2013, 01:06:50 PM
I will! I have a whole backlog of posters I wanted to have framed. The only problem is that professional framing costs an arm and a leg. I wonder if it would be worth it to just buy the frame and do it myself.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Dec 30, 2013, 04:40:43 PM
I remember that poster.  I also remember having one with Lex and Tim sitting at the T-Rex's foot for a promo image.



Btw, I also always thought the Toyota FJ Cruiser would make an excellent JP vehicle....

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi82.servimg.com%2Fu%2Ff82%2F18%2F17%2F74%2F00%2Fjp10.jpg&hash=49527034de0298f21fabfcfe545e03082c59ccc4)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg4.imageshack.us%2Fimg4%2F55%2Fjpfj.jpg&hash=e32b73de9a06ef7ea304df7d71d53cdb861b6aa4)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1264.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fjj491%2FFJX2000%2FJurassicparkFJ_zps80b107d2.jpg&hash=270a0cddff2133c9c7d55725e1b3be0755400c79)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Dec 31, 2013, 07:38:23 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmemedonia.com%2Fupload%2Ffunny%2Ffunny-pictures%2F580243_129191010547082_110294772436706_135711_1300324783_n_original.jpg&hash=58c333070c7e243ee41db091bb5bb29761b4775d)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 31, 2013, 07:40:16 PM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Dec 31, 2013, 07:38:23 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmemedonia.com%2Fupload%2Ffunny%2Ffunny-pictures%2F580243_129191010547082_110294772436706_135711_1300324783_n_original.jpg&hash=58c333070c7e243ee41db091bb5bb29761b4775d)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_PrT25o8Vs#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_PrT25o8Vs#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Dec 31, 2013, 07:41:31 PM
nsfw NA

That's your new nickname.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 31, 2013, 11:23:18 PM
Happy New Year everyone! I'm closing my collection out for 2013 with this lovely gem that arrived today. I originally bought one but because the seller is my home boy, he included a second one for free :')

http://instagram.com/p/imnQcWFElr/ (http://instagram.com/p/imnQcWFElr/)

Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Dec 31, 2013, 07:38:23 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmemedonia.com%2Fupload%2Ffunny%2Ffunny-pictures%2F580243_129191010547082_110294772436706_135711_1300324783_n_original.jpg&hash=58c333070c7e243ee41db091bb5bb29761b4775d)

I'm sure he likes white meat so it's all good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jan 01, 2014, 12:36:29 AM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Dec 31, 2013, 07:38:23 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmemedonia.com%2Fupload%2Ffunny%2Ffunny-pictures%2F580243_129191010547082_110294772436706_135711_1300324783_n_original.jpg&hash=58c333070c7e243ee41db091bb5bb29761b4775d)
Pic of the month!

Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 31, 2013, 11:23:18 PM
Happy New Year everyone! I'm closing my collection out for 2013 with this lovely gem that arrived today. I originally bought one but because the seller is my home boy, he included a second one for free :')

http://instagram.com/p/imnQcWFElr/ (http://instagram.com/p/imnQcWFElr/)
Awesome pick up, always wondered what they looked like up close... are they original?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 02, 2014, 12:17:52 PM
Replicas. The seller has them professionally made so that they are exactly like the ones in the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jan 02, 2014, 07:09:43 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 02, 2014, 12:17:52 PM
Replicas. The seller has them professionally made so that they are exactly like the ones in the movie.
Sweet sauce!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jan 02, 2014, 08:31:32 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 31, 2013, 07:40:16 PM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Dec 31, 2013, 07:38:23 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmemedonia.com%2Fupload%2Ffunny%2Ffunny-pictures%2F580243_129191010547082_110294772436706_135711_1300324783_n_original.jpg&hash=58c333070c7e243ee41db091bb5bb29761b4775d)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_PrT25o8Vs#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_PrT25o8Vs#ws)
Holy crap, there are women in that video!

Took me a second watch to notice.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 03, 2014, 04:18:17 AM
Best commercial of the year....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYZGZOtc3Oc#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYZGZOtc3Oc#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jan 03, 2014, 04:44:13 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jan 03, 2014, 04:18:17 AM
Best commercial of the year....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYZGZOtc3Oc#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYZGZOtc3Oc#ws)

I never thought I'd live to see the day that incredibly well rendered CGI Dinosaurs and They Might Be Giants would join forces to sell cars.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 03, 2014, 09:37:24 AM
That's some pretty decent CGI.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 04, 2014, 10:07:37 PM
My friend Jack scored an interview with Ty Simpkins!

http://www.jurassicworld.org/interviews-tysimpkins1.php (http://www.jurassicworld.org/interviews-tysimpkins1.php)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 04, 2014, 11:36:19 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jan 03, 2014, 04:18:17 AM
Best commercial of the year....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYZGZOtc3Oc#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYZGZOtc3Oc#ws)

It had the reverse effect on me. I want the dinosaur.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jan 07, 2014, 03:01:38 AM
I may be late in this discussion, but anyways: B.D. Wong is rumored to be reprising his role as Dr. Wu!  :o

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 04, 2014, 11:36:19 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jan 03, 2014, 04:18:17 AM
Best commercial of the year....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYZGZOtc3Oc#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYZGZOtc3Oc#ws)

It had the reverse effect on me. I want the dinosaur.
Bet you would like to have these dinosaurs too:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/PROTOTYPE-set-4x-UNRELEASED-2010-Hasbro-JURASSIC-PARK-FIRST-TEST-SHOT-DINOSAURS-/310745535996?pt=US_Action_Figures&hash=item4859e095fc (http://www.ebay.com/itm/PROTOTYPE-set-4x-UNRELEASED-2010-Hasbro-JURASSIC-PARK-FIRST-TEST-SHOT-DINOSAURS-/310745535996?pt=US_Action_Figures&hash=item4859e095fc)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 07, 2014, 04:39:15 AM
Let me just pull that money out my pocket....
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 07, 2014, 04:41:03 AM
Wu-hoo!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jan 07, 2014, 04:41:28 AM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Jan 07, 2014, 03:01:38 AM
I may be late in this discussion, but anyways: B.D. Wong is rumored to be reprising his role as Dr. Wu!  :o

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 04, 2014, 11:36:19 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jan 03, 2014, 04:18:17 AM
Best commercial of the year....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYZGZOtc3Oc#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYZGZOtc3Oc#ws)

It had the reverse effect on me. I want the dinosaur.
Bet you would like to have these dinosaurs too:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/PROTOTYPE-set-4x-UNRELEASED-2010-Hasbro-JURASSIC-PARK-FIRST-TEST-SHOT-DINOSAURS-/310745535996?pt=US_Action_Figures&hash=item4859e095fc (http://www.ebay.com/itm/PROTOTYPE-set-4x-UNRELEASED-2010-Hasbro-JURASSIC-PARK-FIRST-TEST-SHOT-DINOSAURS-/310745535996?pt=US_Action_Figures&hash=item4859e095fc)

What does it say about me that I don't think those look appealing in the slightest?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Jan 07, 2014, 04:58:24 AM
Nah, I think the same thing. I've never gotten anything to do with collecting items and shit like that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 07, 2014, 05:02:41 AM
I don't think even Doom would waste that much money on those.  Even for prototypes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jan 07, 2014, 05:07:03 AM
Never hurts to look ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 07, 2014, 12:33:26 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Jan 07, 2014, 03:01:38 AM
I may be late in this discussion, but anyways: B.D. Wong is rumored to be reprising his role as Dr. Wu!  :o

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 04, 2014, 11:36:19 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jan 03, 2014, 04:18:17 AM
Best commercial of the year....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYZGZOtc3Oc#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYZGZOtc3Oc#ws)

It had the reverse effect on me. I want the dinosaur.
Bet you would like to have these dinosaurs too:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/PROTOTYPE-set-4x-UNRELEASED-2010-Hasbro-JURASSIC-PARK-FIRST-TEST-SHOT-DINOSAURS-/310745535996?pt=US_Action_Figures&hash=item4859e095fc (http://www.ebay.com/itm/PROTOTYPE-set-4x-UNRELEASED-2010-Hasbro-JURASSIC-PARK-FIRST-TEST-SHOT-DINOSAURS-/310745535996?pt=US_Action_Figures&hash=item4859e095fc)

Oh shit! These are back for sale, heh. I figured a certain someone would have bought them by now...

Expensive indeed, but for good reason. Unpainted prototypes are extremely hard to come by and these may very well be the only ones of these figures in existence. I'd buy them if I could.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Jan 07, 2014, 03:05:36 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Jan 07, 2014, 03:01:38 AM
I may be late in this discussion, but anyways: B.D. Wong is rumored to be reprising his role as Dr. Wu!  :o

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 04, 2014, 11:36:19 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jan 03, 2014, 04:18:17 AM
Best commercial of the year....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYZGZOtc3Oc#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYZGZOtc3Oc#ws)

It had the reverse effect on me. I want the dinosaur.
Bet you would like to have these dinosaurs too:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/PROTOTYPE-set-4x-UNRELEASED-2010-Hasbro-JURASSIC-PARK-FIRST-TEST-SHOT-DINOSAURS-/310745535996?pt=US_Action_Figures&hash=item4859e095fc (http://www.ebay.com/itm/PROTOTYPE-set-4x-UNRELEASED-2010-Hasbro-JURASSIC-PARK-FIRST-TEST-SHOT-DINOSAURS-/310745535996?pt=US_Action_Figures&hash=item4859e095fc)

OMG OMG give me now!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Jan 10, 2014, 12:15:41 AM
Well thats just great :(

http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1423 (http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1423)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jan 10, 2014, 02:38:48 AM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Jan 10, 2014, 12:15:41 AM
Well thats just great :(

http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1423 (http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1423)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Frequiemradiomx.files.wordpress.com%2F2013%2F04%2Fdarth-vader-nooooo.jpg&hash=4ab23b1cad34c2934db086ef177d6ce403ef8704)

Spoiler
Well, I guess it's ok.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 10, 2014, 02:56:38 PM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Jan 10, 2014, 12:15:41 AM
Well thats just great :(

http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1423 (http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1423)

I'm happy with the idea of this possibly meaning The Goldblum returns but I wanted to see Alan and Ian back together again :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 11, 2014, 12:41:39 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 10, 2014, 02:56:38 PM
I wanted to see Alan and Ian back together again :(

Me too man.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jan 11, 2014, 12:57:56 AM
As long as there's hope for the Goldblum experience, I'm good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 11, 2014, 02:07:19 AM
Do you guys think the author could be on to something with that bit about them alternating appearances for each movie? I wonder if that was intentional.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jan 11, 2014, 03:34:04 AM
Question for DoomRulz;

Have you ever played (or still play) Jurassic Park for Sega Genesis? If so, have you ever beaten the very last part as Dr. grant?
Spoiler
The part where Dr. Grant has to "kill" the two Raptors in the main foyer with the T-rex skeleton.
[close]
If yes, HOW IS IT DONE?!?! I have been trying to figure it out for many years...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jan 11, 2014, 06:30:06 PM
Jump down between the two raptors, they'll both have their backs to you. From here, throw grenades at the big grey boulders at the base of each skeleton. I think you need to use explosive grenades rather than gas or flash, three should do the trick.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 11, 2014, 06:43:31 PM
Lol, I still need to beat The Lost World for SEGA Saturn  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 13, 2014, 12:54:21 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Jan 11, 2014, 03:34:04 AM
Question for DoomRulz;

Have you ever played (or still play) Jurassic Park for Sega Genesis? If so, have you ever beaten the very last part as Dr. grant?
Spoiler
The part where Dr. Grant has to "kill" the two Raptors in the main foyer with the T-rex skeleton.
[close]
If yes, HOW IS IT DONE?!?! I have been trying to figure it out for many years...

Nope, never. The only JP games I've played are Operation Genesis, JP Builder, Warpath, JP: The Game, and The Chaos Continues.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 13, 2014, 03:38:26 PM
Chris Pratt confirmed for 'Jurassic World'

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bd1609GCYAILu8A.jpg)

http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=95 (http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=95)


'Jurassic World' begins film prep on January 20th.  Starts filming in Louisiana on June 2nd

http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=94 (http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=94)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 13, 2014, 04:27:37 PM
QuoteWe know that Jurassic World was set to head to Hawaii for on-location shooting in March, but we have no word on whether or not this is still true. It would make sense for the film to head there first, and then move to sound stages in Louisiana in June.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jan 13, 2014, 04:53:44 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jan 13, 2014, 03:38:26 PM
Chris Pratt confirmed for 'Jurassic World'

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bd1609GCYAILu8A.jpg

http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=95 (http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=95)


'Jurassic World' begins film prep on January 20th.  Starts filming in Louisiana on June 2nd

http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=94 (http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=94)
Great news all around!  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 14, 2014, 09:01:14 PM
This episode should be out this Thursday. I'll keep you guys posted.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi43.tinypic.com%2F14oc6co.jpg&hash=20e539c94ca62fc3fe61c6370c371627abc45924)

@Jurassiccast
JPforever.com
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 15, 2014, 12:21:50 PM
New arrival! I made a short video this time. I think I'll stick to these from now on.

http://instagram.com/p/jLOSyslErB/ (http://instagram.com/p/jLOSyslErB/)

Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 14, 2014, 09:01:14 PM
This episode should be out this Thursday. I'll keep you guys posted.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi43.tinypic.com%2F14oc6co.jpg&hash=20e539c94ca62fc3fe61c6370c371627abc45924)

@Jurassiccast
JPforever.com

Please tell me you asked him if a feature length Prehistoric Beast will ever happen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 15, 2014, 04:56:11 PM
I bring up Prehistoric Beast ;)

I also just finished this banner for our website...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F-eKzMYjn1J7U%2FUtbGRMVyZDI%2FAAAAAAAAAMA%2F4Hq4MmFpkvA%2Fs1600%2FCartoon%252BBanner%252BFinal.png&hash=15ba9a8dc9c6fb3c21bfdb8f2b05c0efeb9aace4)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 15, 2014, 06:51:26 PM
Well then! I'll just have to listen to it...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 15, 2014, 11:52:26 PM
Awesome banner  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jan 16, 2014, 12:37:23 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 15, 2014, 12:21:50 PM
New arrival! I made a short video this time. I think I'll stick to these from now on.

http://instagram.com/p/jLOSyslErB/ (http://instagram.com/p/jLOSyslErB/)
Spoiler
definitely on steriods.
[close]
If that was a real bike I would be going to get a motorcycle license or a job at Ingen.  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 16, 2014, 12:49:01 AM
I'm not sure it would be street legal, haha.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Jan 16, 2014, 01:11:57 AM
Dude thats awesome!

Do you think you can get your hands on this ?

D.A.R.T ?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.figurerealm.com%2FGalleries%2Fjurassicparklostworld%2FDart-Front.jpg&hash=218c60484f5e3a6d4739bc073c5eb0097f8a13ca)

Been looking for it every where.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jan 16, 2014, 01:19:15 AM
just watched today a lot of youtube vids about JP toys and hell a french company called PAPO made much much much muuuuuuuuuuuuch better work than Kennel or any other company

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fplesiosauria.com%2Fdinotoyimage%2Foct09%2Ftyrannosaurus_rex_papo4.jpg&hash=6ec4bc31ee3d10fb3811972626a3e0781b6e59f3)
(https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT-7AQsJHvOiR8z5qpgt0D3lbYtrT6RuQmMOX545fxQtVaV5_xQig)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jan 16, 2014, 01:20:16 AM
I have one of their Trex figures. Looks really good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jan 16, 2014, 01:22:02 AM
u lucky bastard :) plus these are unofficial JP figures if im right, yet the resemblence is undeniable, hoping for more from them after the next movie
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: AliceApocalypse on Jan 16, 2014, 02:35:23 AM
Quote from: szkoki on Jan 16, 2014, 01:19:15 AM
just watched today a lot of youtube vids about JP toys and hell a french company called PAPO made much much much muuuuuuuuuuuuch better work than Kennel or any other company

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fplesiosauria.com%2Fdinotoyimage%2Foct09%2Ftyrannosaurus_rex_papo4.jpg&hash=6ec4bc31ee3d10fb3811972626a3e0781b6e59f3)


Awe!  My favorite toy as a kid was a model T Rex that I built myself.  His name was Roscoe and he ate all my barbies   ;D 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 16, 2014, 03:32:42 AM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Jan 16, 2014, 01:11:57 AM
Dude thats awesome!

Do you think you can get your hands on this ?

D.A.R.T ?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.figurerealm.com%2FGalleries%2Fjurassicparklostworld%2FDart-Front.jpg&hash=218c60484f5e3a6d4739bc073c5eb0097f8a13ca)

Been looking for it every where.

It's a rare one, but it's around. It usually goes for about $50 USD.

Quote from: szkoki on Jan 16, 2014, 01:19:15 AM
just watched today a lot of youtube vids about JP toys and hell a french company called PAPO made much much much muuuuuuuuuuuuch better work than Kennel or any other company

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fplesiosauria.com%2Fdinotoyimage%2Foct09%2Ftyrannosaurus_rex_papo4.jpg&hash=6ec4bc31ee3d10fb3811972626a3e0781b6e59f3)
https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT-7AQsJHvOiR8z5qpgt0D3lbYtrT6RuQmMOX545fxQtVaV5_xQig

Those are OK. Their T.Rex and Spino are horribly inaccurate. They're too JP-inspired.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Jan 16, 2014, 03:34:05 AM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Jan 16, 2014, 01:11:57 AM
Dude thats awesome!

Do you think you can get your hands on this ?

D.A.R.T ?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.figurerealm.com%2FGalleries%2Fjurassicparklostworld%2FDart-Front.jpg&hash=218c60484f5e3a6d4739bc073c5eb0097f8a13ca)

Been looking for it every where.

EVIL HUNTERS :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jan 16, 2014, 03:37:57 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Jan 16, 2014, 03:34:05 AM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Jan 16, 2014, 01:11:57 AM
Dude thats awesome!

Do you think you can get your hands on this ?

D.A.R.T ?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.figurerealm.com%2FGalleries%2Fjurassicparklostworld%2FDart-Front.jpg&hash=218c60484f5e3a6d4739bc073c5eb0097f8a13ca)

Been looking for it every where.

EVIL HUNTERS :laugh:
HUNTERS OF DINOSAURS AND PUSSY
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 16, 2014, 04:46:30 AM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Jan 16, 2014, 01:11:57 AM
Dude thats awesome!

Do you think you can get your hands on this ?

D.A.R.T ?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.figurerealm.com%2FGalleries%2Fjurassicparklostworld%2FDart-Front.jpg&hash=218c60484f5e3a6d4739bc073c5eb0097f8a13ca)

Been looking for it every where.

Imagine driving that turd through a dinosaur infested jungle?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 16, 2014, 10:49:54 AM
Quote from: szkoki on Jan 16, 2014, 01:19:15 AM
just watched today a lot of youtube vids about JP toys and hell a french company called PAPO made much much much muuuuuuuuuuuuch better work than Kennel or any other company

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fplesiosauria.com%2Fdinotoyimage%2Foct09%2Ftyrannosaurus_rex_papo4.jpg&hash=6ec4bc31ee3d10fb3811972626a3e0781b6e59f3)
https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT-7AQsJHvOiR8z5qpgt0D3lbYtrT6RuQmMOX545fxQtVaV5_xQig

Did you manage to catch my videos?

I own several Papo dinosaurs and they are top quality. i really want their carnotaurus.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi273.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fjj221%2Fikessauro%2FFacebook%2FCOLEO%2520PRHISTRICOS%2520PAPO%2F598600_10200455685093259_1922145871_n.jpg&hash=5aa0e00791f72c561e98328caae9915601d9f643)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: C91_SJ on Jan 16, 2014, 09:32:42 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 16, 2014, 10:49:54 AM
I own several Papo dinosaurs and they are top quality. i really want their carnotaurus.

I own this one, he's top notch.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jan 16, 2014, 09:58:19 PM
Quote from: AliceApocalypse on Jan 16, 2014, 02:35:23 AM
Quote from: szkoki on Jan 16, 2014, 01:19:15 AM
just watched today a lot of youtube vids about JP toys and hell a french company called PAPO made much much much muuuuuuuuuuuuch better work than Kennel or any other company

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fplesiosauria.com%2Fdinotoyimage%2Foct09%2Ftyrannosaurus_rex_papo4.jpg&hash=6ec4bc31ee3d10fb3811972626a3e0781b6e59f3)


Awe!  My favorite toy as a kid was a model T Rex that I built myself.  His name was Roscoe and he ate all my barbies   ;D

how did you built a t-rex?  :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: C91_SJ on Jan 16, 2014, 10:02:30 PM
Quote from: szkoki on Jan 16, 2014, 09:58:19 PM
how did you built a t-rex?  :o

how did they do in Jurassic Park? ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 16, 2014, 10:13:08 PM
Anyone got any questions they'd like answered on the next Jurassic Cast episode? Send them now!

:UPDATE:

The Phil Tippett interview will be out 8pm GMT tomorrow!
He talks about Jurassic World and his experiences with the original.

jpforever.com
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 17, 2014, 03:35:21 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 16, 2014, 10:49:54 AM
Quote from: szkoki on Jan 16, 2014, 01:19:15 AM
just watched today a lot of youtube vids about JP toys and hell a french company called PAPO made much much much muuuuuuuuuuuuch better work than Kennel or any other company

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fplesiosauria.com%2Fdinotoyimage%2Foct09%2Ftyrannosaurus_rex_papo4.jpg&hash=6ec4bc31ee3d10fb3811972626a3e0781b6e59f3)
https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT-7AQsJHvOiR8z5qpgt0D3lbYtrT6RuQmMOX545fxQtVaV5_xQig

Did you manage to catch my videos?

I own several Papo dinosaurs and they are top quality. i really want their carnotaurus.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi273.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fjj221%2Fikessauro%2FFacebook%2FCOLEO%2520PRHISTRICOS%2520PAPO%2F598600_10200455685093259_1922145871_n.jpg&hash=5aa0e00791f72c561e98328caae9915601d9f643)

I received the Papo T.Rex as a Christmas gift. It's OK. It, along with the Spinosaurus, are actually pretty inaccurate in terms of their design. They draw too heavily on Jurassic Park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 18, 2014, 10:54:24 AM
Our interview with Phil Tippett is out now! He chats Jurassic Park, Starship Troopers, and Jurassic World.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-rvbzi25CGJI%2FUtbLgOts8TI%2FAAAAAAAAAMQ%2FXuNouy5Dd50%2Fs1600%2FPT.jpg&hash=fba993e4bf80ec0195684b099ed4d261bfcac456)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sq8RakHPLDA#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sq8RakHPLDA#ws)

You can download the full episode at jpforever.com
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 19, 2014, 12:00:02 AM
That is just so awesome that you guys got him.  Love where he talks about seeing JP all put together finally and he's like "It's not terrible!"  I can understand how people that have worked on acclaimed films tend to not take it as seriously as the fans.  It's a nightmare putting these things together!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 19, 2014, 02:12:48 PM
Cheers for listening!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 26, 2014, 09:22:54 PM
OH MAH FREAKIN GOD.  LOOKS WHAT'S UP FOR AUCTION ON EBAY....

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.ebayimg.com%2F00%2Fs%2FNzY4WDEwMjQ%3D%2Fz%2FI-oAAMXQlgtS5IvV%2F%24_57.JPG&hash=9d6c0a4d8a3788d559c1b3def3452ae465395ee4)

http://www.ebay.com/itm/331115447671?redirect=mobile (http://www.ebay.com/itm/331115447671?redirect=mobile)

The need for cash is strong today!!!!



Also up for auction!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.ebayimg.com%2F00%2Fs%2FNzY4WDEwMjQ%3D%2Fz%2FZhkAAOxy4dNS5Iuw%2F%24_57.JPG&hash=3936b359a773c26fb775889ecb2a1b299e3062d7)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimagehost.vendio.com%2Fbin%2Fimageserver.x%2F00000000%2Fradthemovie%2F12514BP022.jpg&hash=81a5a62982080fddbab1a05cf5a6d68f61b30dde)


http://www.ebay.com/itm/JURASSIC-PARK-Velociraptor-Cage-Crate-1993-Original-Screen-Used-Movie-Prop-/390756055657?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item5afae03a69 (http://www.ebay.com/itm/JURASSIC-PARK-Velociraptor-Cage-Crate-1993-Original-Screen-Used-Movie-Prop-/390756055657?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item5afae03a69)


DOOM!!!!!!!! GET OVER HERE!!!!!!!!

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 26, 2014, 09:25:42 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jan 26, 2014, 09:22:54 PM
OH MAH FREAKIN GOD.  LOOKS WHAT'S UP FOR AUCTION ON EBAY....

http://www.ebay.com/itm/331115447671?redirect=mobile (http://www.ebay.com/itm/331115447671?redirect=mobile)

The need for cash is strong today!!!!
Oh sweet castle of f**ks...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 26, 2014, 09:30:17 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jan 26, 2014, 09:25:42 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jan 26, 2014, 09:22:54 PM
OH MAH FREAKIN GOD.  LOOKS WHAT'S UP FOR AUCTION ON EBAY....

http://www.ebay.com/itm/331115447671?redirect=mobile (http://www.ebay.com/itm/331115447671?redirect=mobile)

The need for cash is strong today!!!!
Oh sweet castle of f**ks...

SHOOT HER.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Jan 26, 2014, 10:41:56 PM
OH MOTHER OF GOD!!

WHERES DOOMRULZ?!

I want I want I want I want I want I want I want I want I want I want I want I want!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jan 26, 2014, 11:32:41 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jan 26, 2014, 09:22:54 PM
OH MAH FREAKIN GOD.  LOOKS WHAT'S UP FOR AUCTION ON EBAY....

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.ebayimg.com%2F00%2Fs%2FNzY4WDEwMjQ%3D%2Fz%2FI-oAAMXQlgtS5IvV%2F%24_57.JPG&hash=9d6c0a4d8a3788d559c1b3def3452ae465395ee4)

http://www.ebay.com/itm/331115447671?redirect=mobile (http://www.ebay.com/itm/331115447671?redirect=mobile)

The need for cash is strong today!!!!



Also up for auction!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.ebayimg.com%2F00%2Fs%2FNzY4WDEwMjQ%3D%2Fz%2FZhkAAOxy4dNS5Iuw%2F%24_57.JPG&hash=3936b359a773c26fb775889ecb2a1b299e3062d7)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimagehost.vendio.com%2Fbin%2Fimageserver.x%2F00000000%2Fradthemovie%2F12514BP022.jpg&hash=81a5a62982080fddbab1a05cf5a6d68f61b30dde)


http://www.ebay.com/itm/JURASSIC-PARK-Velociraptor-Cage-Crate-1993-Original-Screen-Used-Movie-Prop-/390756055657?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item5afae03a69 (http://www.ebay.com/itm/JURASSIC-PARK-Velociraptor-Cage-Crate-1993-Original-Screen-Used-Movie-Prop-/390756055657?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item5afae03a69)


DOOM!!!!!!!! GET OVER HERE!!!!!!!!
I...I....I think I am going to faint! Seeing how much room (or storage) these can take up, I can understand why they would be up for grabs. I need that Raptor cage for my peacock  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Jan 26, 2014, 11:33:57 PM
Dude I need that raptor cage for myself.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Jan 27, 2014, 01:40:18 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jan 26, 2014, 09:30:17 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jan 26, 2014, 09:25:42 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jan 26, 2014, 09:22:54 PM
OH MAH FREAKIN GOD.  LOOKS WHAT'S UP FOR AUCTION ON EBAY....

http://www.ebay.com/itm/331115447671?redirect=mobile (http://www.ebay.com/itm/331115447671?redirect=mobile)

The need for cash is strong today!!!!
Oh sweet castle of f**ks...

SHOOT HER.

I WANT TASERS ON FULL CHARGE!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 27, 2014, 12:14:19 PM
I don't know why the hell you guys are screaming my name because it's not as if I'll be buying them :'(

I want the cage. I will make it my summer cottage and laugh like Ian Malcolm whenever someone walks past. I will also tow it along with the trailer. Hey, a guy can dream :-[

I've always wondered how movie props in general are put up for sale. Is it via former/current employees?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 27, 2014, 03:12:57 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 27, 2014, 12:14:19 PM
I don't know why the hell you guys are screaming my name because it's not as if I'll be buying them :'(

I want the cage. I will make it my summer cottage and laugh like Ian Malcolm whenever someone walks past. I will also tow it along with the trailer. Hey, a guy can dream :-[

I've always wondered how movie props in general are put up for sale. Is it via former/current employees?

Not sure on that one.  Looks like this guy somehow collects rare movie props and sells them later.  It's amazing how much of the trailer and cage are actually constructed of wood.  Should make for easy fixes then.   I just hope the winning bidder restores them and enters them in some kind of movie car/ prop museum - where you can enter the trailer and everything works, and the raptor makes noises.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 27, 2014, 03:57:45 PM
Heh, I shared the link for the trailer on my Facebook wall and one of my friends suggested buying it and turning it into a themed restaurant. Personally, I'd go for that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Jan 27, 2014, 05:11:53 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.tumblr.com%2F70152e12818724194226aa524e980fd0%2Ftumblr_inline_mkyt4jmcNE1qz4rgp.gif&hash=412b79d33205d3b1ab5ba6694b5f4d789d3194e9)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 27, 2014, 05:42:18 PM
Yeah, why not? Think about it. Take a lease out on a big space, turn it into a restaurant, then include the renovated RV inside as a prop that people could explore, or include a couple of small dining booths inside of it. I think it would be pretty epic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Jan 27, 2014, 05:44:01 PM
Spare no expense!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jan 28, 2014, 12:36:26 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 27, 2014, 12:14:19 PM
I don't know why the hell you guys are screaming my name because it's not as if I'll be buying them :'(

I want the cage. I will make it my summer cottage and laugh like Ian Malcolm whenever someone walks past. I will also tow it along with the trailer. Hey, a guy can dream :-[

I've always wondered how movie props in general are put up for sale. Is it via former/current employees?
I wanna see that Instagram pic ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 28, 2014, 12:59:18 AM
The cage is basically at $100,000 right now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jan 28, 2014, 01:06:33 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jan 28, 2014, 12:59:18 AM
The cage is basically at $100,000 right now.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.adw.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Ffainted.jpg&hash=2bcf1a19138da4235dc925cf67a309093044706c)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 28, 2014, 04:34:02 AM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Jan 28, 2014, 12:36:26 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 27, 2014, 12:14:19 PM
I don't know why the hell you guys are screaming my name because it's not as if I'll be buying them :'(

I want the cage. I will make it my summer cottage and laugh like Ian Malcolm whenever someone walks past. I will also tow it along with the trailer. Hey, a guy can dream :-[

I've always wondered how movie props in general are put up for sale. Is it via former/current employees?
I wanna see that Instagram pic ;D

Haha! It would have to be a video ;D

I'm surprised the trailer is at less than $10K. I mean...it's a trailer for crying out loud.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 29, 2014, 03:47:06 AM
Jurassic World will be set on Isla Nublar & is currently casting supporting roles and prepping set locations in Hawaii

http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1511 (http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1511)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 30, 2014, 03:21:28 PM
I am so going to submit myself for an audition. I've waited long enough for an opportunity like this one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jan 31, 2014, 05:18:29 AM
^ As Dutch once said: "Do it, DO IT!" :D

ALSO, you gotta check these out (if you haven't already):

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Rare-Jurassic-Park-Dino-Trackers-Prototype-Set-Action-Figures-1993-Mint-in-box-/121264163961?pt=US_Action_Figures&hash=item1c3be84c79 (http://www.ebay.com/itm/Rare-Jurassic-Park-Dino-Trackers-Prototype-Set-Action-Figures-1993-Mint-in-box-/121264163961?pt=US_Action_Figures&hash=item1c3be84c79)

Cool story behind them too. Finally, ever watch the 2001 movie Raptor? thinking about getting a used copy on Zon...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 31, 2014, 02:36:25 PM
Wow, $3K...I think I know someone who would be both interested, and be able to afford them. Sadly, I'm not referring to myself :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Jan 31, 2014, 03:23:52 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Jan 29, 2014, 03:47:06 AM
Jurassic World will be set on Isla Nublar & is currently casting supporting roles and prepping set locations in Hawaii

http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1511 (http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1511)

I really do hope they go and do more Animatronic Dinos in this too!

And is great news its set on Isla Nublar :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 31, 2014, 10:20:22 PM
I just emailed my agent about JW...*fingers crossed*!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Feb 01, 2014, 11:55:16 AM
New Jurassic Park toy line sheduled for this year JP fans :)

Expected early Spring Late Summer

There also a "Classic Collection" also excpected to launch.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FIOzmDXX.jpg&hash=7fbb641b20709f3b19b843c4afa4b6a7d1607e40)


(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FuM87TIh.jpg&hash=25eaaebe3a46dc0caee84ddbb47e7d5e2a8eefcd)


Excited much :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 01, 2014, 03:41:50 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 31, 2014, 10:20:22 PM
I just emailed my agent about JW...*fingers crossed*!

Good luck mate!

Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Feb 01, 2014, 11:55:16 AM
New Jurassic Park toy line sheduled for this year JP fans :)

Expected early Spring Late Summer

There also a "Classic Collection" also excpected to launch.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FIOzmDXX.jpg&hash=7fbb641b20709f3b19b843c4afa4b6a7d1607e40)


(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FuM87TIh.jpg&hash=25eaaebe3a46dc0caee84ddbb47e7d5e2a8eefcd)


Excited much :D

Isn't this from last year?  Still - can't wait to see if they'll release figures using molds from the original 3 films!   Just hope it doesn't decrease the value of the originals on ebay.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 01, 2014, 06:05:45 PM
In the name of all that is holy Hasbro, PLEASE give us big rubber dinosaurs again. Heck, a re-release of the originals would be epic as well. Not more JP3 repaints, please!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Feb 01, 2014, 11:07:49 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 01, 2014, 03:41:50 PM

Isn't this from last year?  Still - can't wait to see if they'll release figures using molds from the original 3 films!  Just hope it doesn't decrease the value of the originals on ebay.
If anything, the originals should increase in value! :)

Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 01, 2014, 06:05:45 PM
In the name of all that is holy Hasbro, PLEASE give us big rubber dinosaurs again. Heck, a re-release of the originals would be epic as well. Not more JP3 repaints, please!
Re-release of the originals would be epic!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Feb 01, 2014, 11:44:30 PM
They have been sheduled so this year could very well be a great year for JP fans :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 02, 2014, 12:03:51 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 31, 2014, 10:20:22 PM
I just emailed my agent about JW...*fingers crossed*!

Good luck man!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenodog on Feb 02, 2014, 02:52:12 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 01, 2014, 06:05:45 PM
In the name of all that is holy Hasbro, PLEASE give us big rubber dinosaurs again. Heck, a re-release of the originals would be epic as well. Not more JP3 repaints, please!

You mean like the giant T.Rex hand puppet?  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Feb 02, 2014, 05:38:59 PM
^ I owned that. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenodog on Feb 02, 2014, 05:55:24 PM
Mine currently resides proudly watching over the rest of my JP and dinosaur stuff in the parent's attic.  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Feb 02, 2014, 06:00:57 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 31, 2014, 10:20:22 PM
I just emailed my agent about JW...*fingers crossed*!
Is he CIA
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Feb 02, 2014, 06:25:29 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Feb 02, 2014, 06:00:57 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 31, 2014, 10:20:22 PM
I just emailed my agent about JW...*fingers crossed*!
Is he CIA

Does he dress like Dodgson?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Feb 02, 2014, 06:38:30 PM
Could be getting on a Allosaurus Assault actionfigure soon bundled with the GI Joe style guy!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 03, 2014, 04:05:19 AM
Quote from: Xenodog on Feb 02, 2014, 02:52:12 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 01, 2014, 06:05:45 PM
In the name of all that is holy Hasbro, PLEASE give us big rubber dinosaurs again. Heck, a re-release of the originals would be epic as well. Not more JP3 repaints, please!

You mean like the giant T.Rex hand puppet?  :laugh:

Sure, why not? I still have my Velociraptor one. Heck, we were on a TV show together.

No, really.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Feb 03, 2014, 04:38:12 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Feb 02, 2014, 05:38:59 PM
^ I owned that. :laugh:

I had the T.Rex and the Velociraptor. Dem glow in the dark eyes and teeth.  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Feb 03, 2014, 07:37:47 AM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Feb 03, 2014, 04:38:12 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Feb 02, 2014, 05:38:59 PM
^ I owned that. :laugh:

I had the T.Rex and the Velociraptor. Dem glow in the dark eyes and teeth.  8)

Same with the Godzilla 98 one I own.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs30.postimg.org%2Fvjrx3izch%2FGodzilla98_puppet.jpg&hash=e2077118ed323befc6d99c56cfa9b89e844a5b5b)

But I want this one....

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fecx.images-amazon.com%2Fimages%2FI%2F51pYxvXWJ2L.jpg&hash=bf17bdd7a61adb7ee8caf6d8064b4c35dc5009b5)

Spoiler
BTW i love the box art its great :P
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 03, 2014, 12:35:02 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Feb 02, 2014, 06:25:29 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Feb 02, 2014, 06:00:57 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 31, 2014, 10:20:22 PM
I just emailed my agent about JW...*fingers crossed*!
Is he CIA

Does he dress like Dodgson?

Nah, she's not one for hats.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 03, 2014, 01:14:35 PM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Feb 03, 2014, 07:37:47 AM
But I want this one....

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51pYxvXWJ2L.jpg

I own it. Used it for my fan film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Feb 03, 2014, 04:03:51 PM
Do any of you guys hide this stuff when you've got a lady over?

This is a legitimate question, I actually want to know, because I myself admit to taking down a poster or two...  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 03, 2014, 04:06:13 PM
Every single woman who has entered my home has seen it all. I've also had sex in their presence. So there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Feb 03, 2014, 04:07:38 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Feb 03, 2014, 04:03:51 PM
Do any of you guys hide this stuff when you've got a lady over?

This is a legitimate question, I actually want to know, because I myself admit to taking down a poster or two...  :laugh:

Haha. Uh I actually had a lady friend over the house yesterday for the Superbowl. I thought she was gonna walk out the door when she saw my graphic novel/comic shit. But she dug it. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Feb 03, 2014, 04:08:33 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 03, 2014, 04:06:13 PM
Every single woman who has entered my home has seen it all. I've also had sex in their presence. So there.
You should hook it up so that at the press of a single button they all roared their individual roars, like a prehistoric chorus. And press it as you climax.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 03, 2014, 04:10:01 PM
Hahahahaha! That would stop the climax because I'd be focusing on finding the button. I'd probably even forget it's there!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Feb 03, 2014, 04:10:51 PM
Quote from: BANE on Feb 03, 2014, 04:08:33 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 03, 2014, 04:06:13 PM
Every single woman who has entered my home has seen it all. I've also had sex in their presence. So there.
You should hook it up so that at the press of a single button they all roared their individual roars, like a prehistoric chorus. And press it as you climax.  :laugh:
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi86.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk93%2FDoomRulz_316%2Fsamneill_zps4d89a499.png&hash=d5ffadc3b86125241c3ec035ed380c8f001b434d)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Feb 03, 2014, 04:45:45 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 03, 2014, 04:06:13 PM
Every single woman who has entered my home has seen it all. I've also had sex in their presence. So there.
Would the answer change if I said specified that they had to be sober?










Spoiler
ᵒᵏᵃʸ ᵗʰᵃᵗ ʷᵃˢ ᵐᵉᵃᶰ ᶦ'ᵐ ˢᵒʳʳʸ
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 03, 2014, 04:49:32 PM
Well then....

I say I buy high-end figures and statues for artwork references  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 03, 2014, 05:53:06 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Feb 03, 2014, 04:45:45 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 03, 2014, 04:06:13 PM
Every single woman who has entered my home has seen it all. I've also had sex in their presence. So there.
Would the answer change if I said specified that they had to be sober?










Spoiler
ᵒᵏᵃʸ ᵗʰᵃᵗ ʷᵃˢ ᵐᵉᵃᶰ ᶦ'ᵐ ˢᵒʳʳʸ
[close]

Smartass, lol. But to answer your question...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v6BL6QvKljo# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v6BL6QvKljo#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Feb 04, 2014, 03:14:59 AM
Colin Trevorrow @colintrevorrow
Thanks, but we already have one. pic.twitter.com/j6s367596P

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BfmVc0tCQAELG92.jpg:large)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 04, 2014, 03:43:29 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Feb 04, 2014, 03:14:59 AM
Colin Trevorrow @colintrevorrow
Thanks, but we already have one. pic.twitter.com/j6s367596P

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BfmVc0tCQAELG92.jpg:large)



f**k!  IT'S CONFIRMEEEEDDDDDDDD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Feb 04, 2014, 03:49:49 AM
Ma...Ma....Malcolm's back??
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 04, 2014, 03:51:46 AM
YES NIGGA!!!!!!



YEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Feb 04, 2014, 03:54:19 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 04, 2014, 03:51:46 AM
YES NIGGA!!!!!!



YEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBxgAmdPQWg#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBxgAmdPQWg#ws)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 04, 2014, 12:14:37 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 04, 2014, 03:43:29 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Feb 04, 2014, 03:14:59 AM
Colin Trevorrow @colintrevorrow
Thanks, but we already have one. pic.twitter.com/j6s367596P

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BfmVc0tCQAELG92.jpg:large)



f**k!  IT'S CONFIRMEEEEDDDDDDDD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Are you sure? How does the picture confirm that? I just thought it was some kind of joke.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 04, 2014, 12:24:36 PM
It is.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Feb 04, 2014, 12:41:39 PM
Might be a joke. Might not.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 04, 2014, 12:42:56 PM
If it is a joke, I think it fell a little flat. I was board the whole time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 04, 2014, 03:48:53 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Feb 04, 2014, 12:41:39 PM
Might be a joke. Might not.

This may be true as Trevorrow didn't flat out deny his involvement in the film.  He just said that his tweet was taken the wrong way.  Perhaps Goldblum is actually in negotiations right now?



Found a sweet new batch of pics....

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rvfuntrips.com%2Ftrip0398%2Fshared%2Ff30498k1.jpg&hash=1f6b0e22b58d2e5d735ff58727e8b2ee69748af6)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.etixland.com%2Funi%2FUSH%2FJProver.jpg&hash=747b824bd1df2699efec48159655101aac597ada)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-zTfcMg08bXc%2FT3zwJ4MwSpI%2FAAAAAAAAAd0%2F31FjnnaGi0Y%2Fs1600%2F71.jpg&hash=a41a4679c04cd1368057fcb16652f8e905f507da)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fd6673sr63mbv7.cloudfront.net%2Farchive%2Fx1448882649%2Fg258000000000000000fd7c05396ce9f4bd22c0512325591e631cefa21e.jpg&hash=7ec2e0df2109a4d5579d2b0b721e61488de1e130)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thefancarpet.com%2Fuploaded_assets%2Fimages%2Fgallery%2F2830%2FThe_Lost_World_Jurassic_Park_47472_Medium.jpg&hash=a055411ad6ca1720520df1f5325095e7705829b0)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcache4.asset-cache.net%2Fgc%2F116898181-actors-jeff-goldblum-vince-vaughn-julianne-gettyimages.jpg%3Fv%3D1%26amp%3Bc%3DIWSAsset%26amp%3Bk%3D2%26amp%3Bd%3DlGnjDs01aeQKqjld9R%252FRaeERxjEjyDmprkX5U8d0L%252FwSiR1iyXbYfATMJ7pnlDw3u1ogp1LteixwFzrxteMJzoFFKDYYeB89F5FN7lK38BE%253D&hash=c42374f8fffe2febafd221747894cd029c44ea77)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjpencyclopedia%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F11%2F012.png&hash=31cf95cc78ac6a817d24c812f08c74f503593261)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic1.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20120807183717%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2Fd%2Fd1%2F306.jpg&hash=8eff136b78b44ee64eaee583c4275b2febe20694)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cinefex.com%2Fbackissues%2Fcovers%2Ffacebook%2FCinefex_70.jpg&hash=cd6fd518920a8abaa0ac34c7c5e0aeef8849ad1f)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Feb 04, 2014, 04:00:44 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 04, 2014, 12:42:56 PM
If it is a joke, I think it fell a little flat. I was board the whole time.

:laugh:



Great pics Req!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 04, 2014, 05:47:35 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 04, 2014, 03:48:53 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-zTfcMg08bXc%2FT3zwJ4MwSpI%2FAAAAAAAAAd0%2F31FjnnaGi0Y%2Fs1600%2F71.jpg&hash=a41a4679c04cd1368057fcb16652f8e905f507da)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cinefex.com%2Fbackissues%2Fcovers%2Ffacebook%2FCinefex_70.jpg&hash=cd6fd518920a8abaa0ac34c7c5e0aeef8849ad1f)
Fantastic.

Last one is the Cinefex cover for the issue dedicated to the film!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gazz on Feb 04, 2014, 09:33:15 PM
Now I'm excited!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 05, 2014, 06:49:01 PM
Never realized how huge Spino was.

Look at this bullshit....

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjpencyclopedia%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F05%2Ftrexspino.jpg&hash=377a84f832b879138c003886d51dd1ac3167ef26)

More BTS shots....

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjpencyclopedia%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F01%2Frexstage.png&hash=0640008fc1f53632bef66dad08fc5eb9edf75f61)
T-Rex's HUGE head!
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjpencyclopedia%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F01%2Fangrydaddy.png&hash=135cf8a74c61d3f9d890458f502471cc65631a9a)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjpencyclopedia%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F01%2FJP3RoboRex.png&hash=26993a1da16a4504b81575e624d2a6e5d95fd6f3)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjpencyclopedia%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F05%2Ftumblr_m8i2euZTco1qa9ofvo1_1280.jpg&hash=00a8ed25672021762266bce3b10515e0906ffe33)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.gawkerassets.com%2Fimg%2F17fj7rqk12bi3jpg%2Fku-xlarge.jpg&hash=bf75b33d3479a591bd49b9a17e112c3f77becbf5)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjpencyclopedia%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F04%2F007.png&hash=2f7b2eaba581811ec67d763720c1993c4594e269)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.huffpost.com%2Fgen%2F1150291%2Fthumbs%2Fr-JURASSIC-PARK-4-REMAKE-large570.jpg%3F6&hash=1b683513021f7994b02690888042a4053c6e9039)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 05, 2014, 07:30:08 PM
Oshit!

Love these!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 05, 2014, 09:30:34 PM
Did these quickly just to get a feeling of what it could have been....

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi374.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Foo183%2FJAROSHULK28%2Fthe-lost-world-jurassic-pnhuk_zps055f47d1.jpg&hash=07d5ed5b53d9160a940674dd7940bf348a319980)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi374.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Foo183%2FJAROSHULK28%2Fjurassic_pegr_zps72e9b71f.jpg&hash=a9a47b7151cc2b2af3cdf08e9ca9c35e4241aaab)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Feb 05, 2014, 10:58:26 PM
^"Before you even knew what you had you patented it, packaged it, slapped it on a plastic lunchbox and now... your selling it."

I'm sold! I think the second one would have been the most interesting!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 05, 2014, 11:00:01 PM
They did have Malcolm as a character in early drafts of the third film. Most of his lines went out to Grant in the end.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Feb 05, 2014, 11:01:26 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic3.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20130801011551%2Fp__%2Fprotagonist%2Fimages%2Fthumb%2Fa%2Faf%2FTumblr_ml3tf1alGA1re4omao1_1280.jpg%2F185px-Tumblr_ml3tf1alGA1re4omao1_1280.jpg&hash=6e785b874b2c2297e02b7bfbafc6dd3f05c2f629)

MALCOLM

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Feb 05, 2014, 11:03:33 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Feb 05, 2014, 11:00:01 PM
They did have Malcolm as a character in early drafts of the third film. Most of his lines went out to Grant in the end.

They should have substituted the kid for Malcolm. Then it would be Grant & Co. on a proper rescue mission. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Feb 05, 2014, 11:08:35 PM
Went on ebay on found out The Lost World trailer sold for a mere $15,100. Can't find the raptor cage tho. Also, found this:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Jurassic-Park-Night-Vision-Goggles-Prop-/271336506445?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item3f2cea844d&nma=true&si=N9bpG6WJiV8AFqTXcn3dVHHehkU%253D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557 (http://www.ebay.com/itm/Jurassic-Park-Night-Vision-Goggles-Prop-/271336506445?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item3f2cea844d&nma=true&si=N9bpG6WJiV8AFqTXcn3dVHHehkU%253D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 05, 2014, 11:15:07 PM
The cage sold for $100,100 I believe.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Feb 05, 2014, 11:30:14 PM
 I was going to for historical reasons (just to say I officially bid on it), good thing I didn't! I would be in deep bc that was the bid when I thought about it...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Feb 06, 2014, 01:52:02 AM
Im debating on on getting one of these Prototype G,I Joe/Jurassic Park figures

http://www.ebay.com/itm/G-I-Joe-25th-Cancelled-Jurassic-Park-Prototype-loose-Figure-tatoo-on-face-rare-/271284938404?ssPageName=ADME:L:OC:GB:3160 (http://www.ebay.com/itm/G-I-Joe-25th-Cancelled-Jurassic-Park-Prototype-loose-Figure-tatoo-on-face-rare-/271284938404?ssPageName=ADME:L:OC:GB:3160)

Can anyone tell me if they are the real deal like ? only going for cheap too.

JPtoys seem to think that there has been many made and people have got there hands on them...

QuotePoints of interest

- In spite of being unreleased, hunderds of these figures surfaced, all of them painted and (as far as we know) complete. Normally prototypes are very rare, and it's even more rare for loose prototypes to come with accessories.
- It's by far the easiest to find of all JP2011 sets, and due to large numbers that were sold it is even cheaper than most released Jurassic Park toys.
- It doesn't wear the HFE (Hasbro Far East) brand, unlike the other JP2011 human figures.
- It's much larger than the other JP2011 figures, probably to make it a more 'bad-ass' character.
- The sale of this figure on eBay is the direct cause of a major dispute between Hasbro Inc. and Jurassic Park collectors, during which Hasbro Inc. hired two lawyers for 5 months to intimidate collectors and claim this specific prototype back on Intellectual Property grounds. Fortunately, Hasbro Inc. only managed to reclaim a handful of these prototypes, and nothing has been heard of the lawyers or Hasbro Inc. for several years now. JPToys.com does not support the trade in stolen goods, but as a fan community we disapprove Hasbro's oppressive actions against innocent collectors.

http://www.jptoys.com/toy-database/jurassic-park-2011/mercenary/index.htm (http://www.jptoys.com/toy-database/jurassic-park-2011/mercenary/index.htm)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on Feb 06, 2014, 01:54:06 AM
GIJOE because you never know when you might need to hand toss a mortar round at an allosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 06, 2014, 02:36:09 AM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Feb 06, 2014, 01:52:02 AM
Im debating on on getting one of these Prototype G,I Joe/Jurassic Park figures

http://www.ebay.com/itm/G-I-Joe-25th-Cancelled-Jurassic-Park-Prototype-loose-Figure-tatoo-on-face-rare-/271284938404?ssPageName=ADME:L:OC:GB:3160 (http://www.ebay.com/itm/G-I-Joe-25th-Cancelled-Jurassic-Park-Prototype-loose-Figure-tatoo-on-face-rare-/271284938404?ssPageName=ADME:L:OC:GB:3160)

Can anyone tell me if they are the real deal like ? only going for cheap too.

JPtoys seem to think that there has been many made and people have got there hands on them...

QuotePoints of interest

- In spite of being unreleased, hunderds of these figures surfaced, all of them painted and (as far as we know) complete. Normally prototypes are very rare, and it's even more rare for loose prototypes to come with accessories.
- It's by far the easiest to find of all JP2011 sets, and due to large numbers that were sold it is even cheaper than most released Jurassic Park toys.
- It doesn't wear the HFE (Hasbro Far East) brand, unlike the other JP2011 human figures.
- It's much larger than the other JP2011 figures, probably to make it a more 'bad-ass' character.
- The sale of this figure on eBay is the direct cause of a major dispute between Hasbro Inc. and Jurassic Park collectors, during which Hasbro Inc. hired two lawyers for 5 months to intimidate collectors and claim this specific prototype back on Intellectual Property grounds. Fortunately, Hasbro Inc. only managed to reclaim a handful of these prototypes, and nothing has been heard of the lawyers or Hasbro Inc. for several years now. JPToys.com does not support the trade in stolen goods, but as a fan community we disapprove Hasbro's oppressive actions against innocent collectors.

http://www.jptoys.com/toy-database/jurassic-park-2011/mercenary/index.htm (http://www.jptoys.com/toy-database/jurassic-park-2011/mercenary/index.htm)

I have one of those. Get it.

Also, new arrival tonight:

http://instagram.com/p/kDPe4clEs0/ (http://instagram.com/p/kDPe4clEs0/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Feb 06, 2014, 02:46:38 AM
Very nice colors for being 20+ years old!

Spoiler
As for the seller washing it, at least you know its clean! Now you can rest your tired head on it and dream about being chased by raptors while being filmed for JW :D
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 06, 2014, 02:55:07 AM
Hahaha! It's sitting on one of my shelves. No way in Hell I'm using it for practical purposes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 06, 2014, 03:57:44 AM
Sweet pillow.  I have an old JP sleeping bag with the Dilo on it in my basement somwhere.  You have that?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Feb 06, 2014, 05:17:54 AM
Colin Trevorrow @colintrevorrow
Honored to be working with cinematographer John Schwartzman on Jurassic World, shooting this April on 35mm and 65mm film. @Kodak @Panavision
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Feb 06, 2014, 10:23:42 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 06, 2014, 02:36:09 AM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Feb 06, 2014, 01:52:02 AM
Im debating on on getting one of these Prototype G,I Joe/Jurassic Park figures

http://www.ebay.com/itm/G-I-Joe-25th-Cancelled-Jurassic-Park-Prototype-loose-Figure-tatoo-on-face-rare-/271284938404?ssPageName=ADME:L:OC:GB:3160 (http://www.ebay.com/itm/G-I-Joe-25th-Cancelled-Jurassic-Park-Prototype-loose-Figure-tatoo-on-face-rare-/271284938404?ssPageName=ADME:L:OC:GB:3160)

Can anyone tell me if they are the real deal like ? only going for cheap too.

JPtoys seem to think that there has been many made and people have got there hands on them...

QuotePoints of interest

- In spite of being unreleased, hunderds of these figures surfaced, all of them painted and (as far as we know) complete. Normally prototypes are very rare, and it's even more rare for loose prototypes to come with accessories.
- It's by far the easiest to find of all JP2011 sets, and due to large numbers that were sold it is even cheaper than most released Jurassic Park toys.
- It doesn't wear the HFE (Hasbro Far East) brand, unlike the other JP2011 human figures.
- It's much larger than the other JP2011 figures, probably to make it a more 'bad-ass' character.
- The sale of this figure on eBay is the direct cause of a major dispute between Hasbro Inc. and Jurassic Park collectors, during which Hasbro Inc. hired two lawyers for 5 months to intimidate collectors and claim this specific prototype back on Intellectual Property grounds. Fortunately, Hasbro Inc. only managed to reclaim a handful of these prototypes, and nothing has been heard of the lawyers or Hasbro Inc. for several years now. JPToys.com does not support the trade in stolen goods, but as a fan community we disapprove Hasbro's oppressive actions against innocent collectors.

http://www.jptoys.com/toy-database/jurassic-park-2011/mercenary/index.htm (http://www.jptoys.com/toy-database/jurassic-park-2011/mercenary/index.htm)

I have one of those. Get it.

Also, new arrival tonight:

http://instagram.com/p/kDPe4clEs0/ (http://instagram.com/p/kDPe4clEs0/)

So they are real ?

Anyway u bought bought one :)

Well excited!

Awesome pillow btw
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 06, 2014, 12:40:20 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 06, 2014, 03:57:44 AM
Sweet pillow.  I have an old JP sleeping bag with the Dilo on it in my basement somwhere.  You have that?

No, no I do not. Though I should think I very well might have one in future 8)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 06, 2014, 11:01:44 PM
Well, You can buy mine off me if you're interested.



New Interview with Phil Tippett!

http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=102 (http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=102)

Spoiler
Quote
Jack: Do you know if Jurassic World is relying more on VFX this time around or will the late Stan Winston's legendary animatronics live on?

Phil: I think there's going to be much more computer graphics and less on-set dinosaurs.

Spoiler
:(
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Feb 07, 2014, 12:21:29 AM
Spoiler
(https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/713819392/hEE988395/)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Feb 07, 2014, 12:49:10 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 06, 2014, 11:01:44 PM
Well, You can buy mine off me if you're interested.



New Interview with Phil Tippett!

http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=102 (http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=102)

Spoiler
Quote
Jack: Do you know if Jurassic World is relying more on VFX this time around or will the late Stan Winston's legendary animatronics live on?

Phil: I think there's going to be much more computer graphics and less on-set dinosaurs.

Spoiler
:(
[close]
[close]

What was that line Malcolm used in Jurassic Park? Extinct. That's how I would describe animatronics these days. :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Feb 07, 2014, 12:50:39 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Feb 07, 2014, 12:49:10 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 06, 2014, 11:01:44 PM
Well, You can buy mine off me if you're interested.



New Interview with Phil Tippett!

http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=102 (http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=102)

Spoiler
Quote
Jack: Do you know if Jurassic World is relying more on VFX this time around or will the late Stan Winston's legendary animatronics live on?

Phil: I think there's going to be much more computer graphics and less on-set dinosaurs.

Spoiler
:(
[close]
[close]

What was that line Malcolm used in Jurassic Park? Extinct. That's how I would describe animatronics these days. :'(

Their jobs got outsourced to computers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Feb 07, 2014, 04:01:37 AM
Looking back on the first two films, holy shit was the CG amazing when you blended it with Animatronics :\ It won't be the same with completely CG-meshed creatures. JP3 fell victim to that, with the Spinosaur looking so digital.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Feb 07, 2014, 04:04:16 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 06, 2014, 11:01:44 PM
Well, You can buy mine off me if you're interested.



New Interview with Phil Tippett!

http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=102 (http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=102)

Spoiler
Quote
Jack: Do you know if Jurassic World is relying more on VFX this time around or will the late Stan Winston's legendary animatronics live on?

Phil: I think there's going to be much more computer graphics and less on-set dinosaurs.

Spoiler
:(
[close]
[close]

From a mile away.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Feb 07, 2014, 04:11:54 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Feb 07, 2014, 12:50:39 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Feb 07, 2014, 12:49:10 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 06, 2014, 11:01:44 PM
Well, You can buy mine off me if you're interested.



New Interview with Phil Tippett!

http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=102 (http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=102)

Spoiler
Quote
Jack: Do you know if Jurassic World is relying more on VFX this time around or will the late Stan Winston's legendary animatronics live on?

Phil: I think there's going to be much more computer graphics and less on-set dinosaurs.

Spoiler
:(
[close]
[close]

What was that line Malcolm used in Jurassic Park? Extinct. That's how I would describe animatronics these days. :'(

Their jobs got outsourced to computers.

Don't you mean extinct?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on Feb 07, 2014, 07:41:28 AM
Quote from: Gate on Feb 07, 2014, 04:01:37 AM
JP3 fell victim to that, with the Spinosaur looking so digital.
The Spinosaur is just as much an animatronic as the other dinosaurs in the series.

Rewatched all of these for some reason over the last few days. I think the reason why the CGI and practical effects blend so well is they actually bothered to make the movements match. The CGI versions do things the practical ones physically couldn't, but they do so in a way that looks like the puppets would have if they were so capable.

Most movies don't bother. Look at A:R-AvPR -- the suit Aliens are largely stiff and inflexible, but when they cut to the CGI versions they're animated and full of life. Even if the CGI had been absolutely photorealistic you'd be able to tell the change just from their behaviour.

It's a pity a lot of movies don't seem to bother any more :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 07, 2014, 02:12:10 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 06, 2014, 11:01:44 PM
Well, You can buy mine off me if you're interested.



New Interview with Phil Tippett!

http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=102 (http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=102)

Spoiler
Quote
Jack: Do you know if Jurassic World is relying more on VFX this time around or will the late Stan Winston's legendary animatronics live on?

Phil: I think there's going to be much more computer graphics and less on-set dinosaurs.

Spoiler
:(
[close]
[close]

How much?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 07, 2014, 02:44:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 07, 2014, 02:12:10 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 06, 2014, 11:01:44 PM
Well, You can buy mine off me if you're interested.



New Interview with Phil Tippett!

http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=102 (http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=102)

Spoiler
Quote
Jack: Do you know if Jurassic World is relying more on VFX this time around or will the late Stan Winston's legendary animatronics live on?

Phil: I think there's going to be much more computer graphics and less on-set dinosaurs.

Spoiler
:(
[close]
[close]

How much?

I'll PM you.

Quote from: SiL on Feb 07, 2014, 07:41:28 AM
Quote from: Gate on Feb 07, 2014, 04:01:37 AM
JP3 fell victim to that, with the Spinosaur looking so digital.
The Spinosaur is just as much an animatronic as the other dinosaurs in the series.

Rewatched all of these for some reason over the last few days. I think the reason why the CGI and practical effects blend so well is they actually bothered to make the movements match. The CGI versions do things the practical ones physically couldn't, but they do so in a way that looks like the puppets would have if they were so capable.

Most movies don't bother. Look at A:R-AvPR -- the suit Aliens are largely stiff and inflexible, but when they cut to the CGI versions they're animated and full of life. Even if the CGI had been absolutely photorealistic you'd be able to tell the change just from their behaviour.

It's a pity a lot of movies don't seem to bother any more :-\

Absolutely.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Feb 07, 2014, 02:52:31 PM
Chris Pratt teases his role: http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=114567 (http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=114567)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Feb 07, 2014, 03:17:04 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 06, 2014, 11:01:44 PM
Well, You can buy mine off me if you're interested.



New Interview with Phil Tippett!

http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=102 (http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=102)

Spoiler
Quote
Jack: Do you know if Jurassic World is relying more on VFX this time around or will the late Stan Winston's legendary animatronics live on?

Phil: I think there's going to be much more computer graphics and less on-set dinosaurs.

Spoiler
:(
[close]
[close]

Trying not to have a cynical view of Jurassic World... but I'm having a cynical view of Jurassic World.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 07, 2014, 07:11:18 PM
Just thought of this, but wouldn't you just love to see these guys in a Jurassic Park movie?...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fhowoldarethey.com%2Fcelebs%2FHughLaurie.jpg&hash=19b9d1706f13f11e956f0e0f0986c1ce500c7ae4)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages2.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20110829202954%2Fkingkong%2Fen%2Fimages%2F8%2F82%2FBruce_Baxter.jpg&hash=8ec23b5d7455269e3eaafd9b9a6eee69c7bec948)

Imagine....

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi374.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Foo183%2FJAROSHULK28%2F91634237bsgbs_zpsbf6a9240.jpg&hash=722b835dee86ab5bf46195e75019ab41e4da5b43)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Feb 08, 2014, 12:38:02 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F6aIziOH.jpg&hash=dece7a7db748c19899addce1ca6d8fb851ef13dc)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 08, 2014, 04:06:20 PM
A friend of mine sent me that this morning. I don't know what to make of it, exactly. All I see is a blurry mess.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Feb 08, 2014, 05:18:17 PM
It's the first movie in still images.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Feb 08, 2014, 05:35:37 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.angelanoelle.com%2F.a%2F6a00d83453dc2969e2017ee97da352970d-800wi&hash=7a88d134d6e5e83d5c5dd447adc4c9dcbea9b22e)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 08, 2014, 07:54:51 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Feb 08, 2014, 05:18:17 PM
It's the first movie in still images.

Yes, but that's only really apparent if you look at an enlarged image. But at this size, it looks blurry.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Feb 08, 2014, 07:58:20 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 08, 2014, 07:54:51 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Feb 08, 2014, 05:18:17 PM
It's the first movie in still images.

Yes, but that's only really apparent if you look at an enlarged image. But at this size, it looks blurry.
...that's why you zoom in if you want to be able to make out a little bit of the images.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 08, 2014, 08:26:30 PM
Quote from: Cal427eb on Feb 08, 2014, 07:58:20 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 08, 2014, 07:54:51 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Feb 08, 2014, 05:18:17 PM
It's the first movie in still images.

Yes, but that's only really apparent if you look at an enlarged image. But at this size, it looks blurry.
...that's why you zoom in if you want to be able to make out a little bit of the images.

Quote from: Gate on Feb 08, 2014, 05:35:37 PM
http://www.angelanoelle.com/.a/6a00d83453dc2969e2017ee97da352970d-800wi

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Feb 08, 2014, 08:27:00 PM
It takes less than a second but 'ight.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Feb 08, 2014, 11:19:27 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth04.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2014%2F039%2F9%2Fa%2Fmy_packaging_for_the_jurassic_park_strike_cycle__by_dilophosaurusalpha-d75njyn.png&hash=b1b88b2c6f52ef49bbc883089b248a8df84427f4)


I know this i totally unrlated but check out my G.I Joe packaging :)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth06.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2014%2F039%2Fc%2Fe%2Fmy_g_i_joe_cobra_h_i_s_s__1984_packaging__by_dilophosaurusalpha-d75njar.png&hash=3ed7c851c5fde8ab2f260cddff4ede24369d7f3c)

And another one spread out:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth03.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2014%2F039%2F0%2Fa%2Fmy_g_i_joe_cobra___hydro_sled_packaging_spread_out_by_dilophosaurusalpha-d75nkuw.png&hash=74d2f4c664cc7481e21dc2121804546472120f3d)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 09, 2014, 05:44:14 AM
Nice packaging designs  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 12, 2014, 03:40:02 PM
Rick Carter talks Jurassic World

http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1557 (http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1557)

Legendary Pictures is co-producing Jurassic World!

http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1551 (http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1551)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 12, 2014, 03:53:41 PM
Forgive my ignorance, but what exactly does the art director do in a movie? Does he set up storyboards?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 12, 2014, 04:33:35 PM
An art director in a film production collaborates on the visual aspect of it (sort of like the production designer but in a more minor role); mainly sets.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 12, 2014, 04:55:33 PM
Got it, thanks! I hope the feel of the new film does indeed echo the old ones. Think we'll see any of the older buildings?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 12, 2014, 05:12:46 PM
Perhaps. But I think it's important they mantain the structural vibe of the buildings and vehicles. They got a very specific visual language about them and it should be kept. It's part of the picture.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 12, 2014, 05:30:31 PM
I'm really looking forward to the vehicle designs. I hope the Wrangler makes a return.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Feb 13, 2014, 02:09:59 AM
Would anyone like to see JPW have a Utahraptor?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Feb 13, 2014, 02:11:48 AM
Nah we've already got giant man sized raptors and the last thing we need is people making arguments over what was better or what's more accurate. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Feb 13, 2014, 02:31:01 AM
Talking Raptors or Bust

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9k9g-LdUCc# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9k9g-LdUCc#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Feb 13, 2014, 02:39:51 AM
I had no idea that they had Rick Carter in on this... f**kin' a. Hopefully this means it feels more like the first two films. Wish he was the full-on Art Director though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Feb 13, 2014, 03:28:45 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Feb 13, 2014, 02:31:01 AM
Talking Raptors or Bust

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9k9g-LdUCc# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9k9g-LdUCc#)

sammyclassicsonicfan.gif
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 13, 2014, 06:03:16 AM
First look at the 'Jurassic World' set being built in Hawaii

http://www.onlocationvacations.com/2014/02/12/first-look-at-the-jurassic-world-set-being-built-in-hawaii/ (http://www.onlocationvacations.com/2014/02/12/first-look-at-the-jurassic-world-set-being-built-in-hawaii/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Feb 13, 2014, 06:11:03 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FUWZMzI3.gif&hash=f63d75f0c13887b2003c42877aec117b91e3d43b)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Feb 13, 2014, 06:11:41 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 13, 2014, 06:03:16 AM
First look at the 'Jurassic World' set being built in Hawaii

http://www.onlocationvacations.com/2014/02/12/first-look-at-the-jurassic-world-set-being-built-in-hawaii/ (http://www.onlocationvacations.com/2014/02/12/first-look-at-the-jurassic-world-set-being-built-in-hawaii/)

That's a lot of wood. /Broderick
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 13, 2014, 06:14:11 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Feb 13, 2014, 06:11:03 AM
http://i.imgur.com/UWZMzI3.gif

I've heard of this one.

This is the first time I'm seeing this "Banderas" meme/gif in use.


First time.


But anyway, yes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 13, 2014, 12:24:24 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 13, 2014, 06:03:16 AM
First look at the 'Jurassic World' set being built in Hawaii

http://www.onlocationvacations.com/2014/02/12/first-look-at-the-jurassic-world-set-being-built-in-hawaii/ (http://www.onlocationvacations.com/2014/02/12/first-look-at-the-jurassic-world-set-being-built-in-hawaii/)

That looks beautiful. I can already picture dinosaurs running amok 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Feb 13, 2014, 03:28:11 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 13, 2014, 06:03:16 AM
First look at the 'Jurassic World' set being built in Hawaii

http://www.onlocationvacations.com/2014/02/12/first-look-at-the-jurassic-world-set-being-built-in-hawaii/ (http://www.onlocationvacations.com/2014/02/12/first-look-at-the-jurassic-world-set-being-built-in-hawaii/)

Yes.

God yes. That looks fantastic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 13, 2014, 03:34:55 PM
Yea.  I still can't believe it's happening. 

I can't even make out what they're building, but I don't care!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 17, 2014, 07:55:13 PM
Early render of a Dinosaur cage for Jurassic World leaked?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FuDuRTW1.jpg&hash=de558e8303826137fb6c916cb2a24e825863f72c)

http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1567 (http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1567)



UPDATE:

QuoteJPLegacy forum user SpielbergFan found a PDF containing the minutes from a meeting that the Industrial Development Board of the City of New Orleans had April 9th, 2013, which confirms that Jurassic World will be filming at the abandoned Six Flags park in New Orleans.

http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=106#comments (http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=106#comments)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Never say no to Panda! on Feb 17, 2014, 08:31:45 PM
Best fence I've ever seen  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Feb 17, 2014, 08:44:22 PM
the "building a new park" stuff just gives me "this is going to be a lame retread, nostalgia trip, with very few new ideas"...

hope i'm wrong :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Feb 17, 2014, 09:15:25 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 13, 2014, 06:03:16 AM
First look at the 'Jurassic World' set being built in Hawaii

http://www.onlocationvacations.com/2014/02/12/first-look-at-the-jurassic-world-set-being-built-in-hawaii/ (http://www.onlocationvacations.com/2014/02/12/first-look-at-the-jurassic-world-set-being-built-in-hawaii/)

Spare no expense.

Damn it, even Nedry knew better than to mess with the raptor fences.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Feb 17, 2014, 10:34:56 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Feb 17, 2014, 08:44:22 PM
the "building a new park" stuff just gives me "this is going to be a lame retread, nostalgia trip, with very few new ideas"...

hope i'm wrong :P
I do too!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Feb 18, 2014, 02:29:57 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi705.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fww57%2FLordVertigo%2FForum%2520stuff%2FIMAG0492_zps369e4959.jpg%3Ft%3D1392733717&hash=0d200362abb75ec9a963f887aba2fb8f7f227472)

Putting the lysine contingency into effect today.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 18, 2014, 02:48:18 PM
People, are, dying!

P.S. Sweet Megalodon tooth
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 18, 2014, 03:05:59 PM
Another set photo

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdistilleryimage11.ak.instagram.com%2Fb713e91a981811e3942f0e12bda11337_8.jpg&hash=a5153d9657e64fac0a3cd3fa848cbb00a342f280)

http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1571 (http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1571)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 18, 2014, 03:59:27 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Feb 18, 2014, 02:29:57 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi705.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fww57%2FLordVertigo%2FForum%2520stuff%2FIMAG0492_zps369e4959.jpg%3Ft%3D1392733717&hash=0d200362abb75ec9a963f887aba2fb8f7f227472)

Putting the lysine contingency into effect today.
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Feb 18, 2014, 04:47:59 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 18, 2014, 03:05:59 PM
Another set photo

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdistilleryimage11.ak.instagram.com%2Fb713e91a981811e3942f0e12bda11337_8.jpg&hash=a5153d9657e64fac0a3cd3fa848cbb00a342f280)

http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1571 (http://www.jurassicworld-movie.com/news/1571)

I wonder how they are going to cover up Godzilla's footprint

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.worldisround.com%2Fphotos%2F7%2F189%2F479.jpg&hash=515da1b4efabba8f72100f56fd32e86e889118d0)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 19, 2014, 03:35:03 PM
The motherf**kers better not.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Feb 19, 2014, 06:32:36 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Feb 18, 2014, 04:47:59 PMI wonder how they are going to cover up Godzilla's footprint

With a big poster for the 2014 movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Feb 19, 2014, 07:14:17 PM
Wait, wait. They actually left Godzilla's foot print there? That's f**king awesome. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 19, 2014, 07:15:20 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Feb 19, 2014, 07:14:17 PM
Wait, wait. They actually left Godzilla's foot print there? That's f**king awesome. :laugh:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia4.s-nbcnews.com%2Fj%2Fmsnbc%2FComponents%2FPhotos%2F070227%2F070227_hawaii2_hmed_4p.grid-6x2.jpg&hash=8965e8463f0c3ffe1979db66392ee9849e3a68aa)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Feb 19, 2014, 07:20:17 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Feb 19, 2014, 07:15:20 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Feb 19, 2014, 07:14:17 PM
Wait, wait. They actually left Godzilla's foot print there? That's f**king awesome. :laugh:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia4.s-nbcnews.com%2Fj%2Fmsnbc%2FComponents%2FPhotos%2F070227%2F070227_hawaii2_hmed_4p.grid-6x2.jpg&hash=8965e8463f0c3ffe1979db66392ee9849e3a68aa)

Hoooly shiiiit :o :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Feb 19, 2014, 08:37:45 PM
Which Godzilla was this? 98?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 19, 2014, 08:39:23 PM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Feb 19, 2014, 08:37:45 PM
Which Godzilla was this? 98?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.underthegunreview.net%2Fwordpress%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F02%2Fsample200048.jpg&hash=645e27b8442bad9e52dbde1bcca978b238c0a234)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Feb 20, 2014, 10:48:40 AM
Haha thats awesome :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 20, 2014, 02:57:57 PM
Utterly flawless.

(https://24.media.tumblr.com/7b79bebb1f3a9b89a0be686e14c7c774/tumblr_mqfwyyjzyW1qjjhbco5_r1_250.gif)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 20, 2014, 04:26:17 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Feb 20, 2014, 02:57:57 PM
Utterly flawless.

https://24.media.tumblr.com/7b79bebb1f3a9b89a0be686e14c7c774/tumblr_mqfwyyjzyW1qjjhbco5_r1_250.gif

Beautiful!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Feb 21, 2014, 11:51:01 PM
Just got my prototype cancelled GI Joe Jurassic Park figure!

http://instagram.com/p/kreZ14SAIj/ (http://instagram.com/p/kreZ14SAIj/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Feb 22, 2014, 12:10:24 AM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Feb 21, 2014, 11:51:01 PM
Just got my prototype cancelled GI Joe Jurassic Park figure!

http://instagram.com/p/kreZ14SAIj/ (http://instagram.com/p/kreZ14SAIj/)
That's awesome!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 22, 2014, 02:04:09 AM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Feb 21, 2014, 11:51:01 PM
Just got my prototype cancelled GI Joe Jurassic Park figure!

http://instagram.com/p/kreZ14SAIj/ (http://instagram.com/p/kreZ14SAIj/)

Doesn't he remind you of JCVD?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 22, 2014, 04:03:33 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 22, 2014, 02:04:09 AM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Feb 21, 2014, 11:51:01 PM
Just got my prototype cancelled GI Joe Jurassic Park figure!

http://instagram.com/p/kreZ14SAIj/ (http://instagram.com/p/kreZ14SAIj/)

Doesn't he remind you of JCVD?

He does!  Lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Feb 22, 2014, 02:44:59 PM
haha he does indeed! , its a awesome figure :) just hope its legit
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 23, 2014, 04:00:21 AM
Found a nice pic of the Jurassic Park Ride grand opening.  If I recall, Spielberg never went on it, lol.  Don't know about Goldblum though....

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmno.hu%2Fdata%2Fcikk%2F1%2F18%2F35%2F7%2Fcikk_1183507%2Fjurassic.jpg&hash=034074b56df1252c6e969daf1701b2d8cac26f7a)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Feb 23, 2014, 04:01:32 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 23, 2014, 04:00:21 AM
Found a nice pic of the Jurassic Park Ride grand opening.  If I recall, Spielberg never went on it, lol.  Don't know about Goldblum though....

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmno.hu%2Fdata%2Fcikk%2F1%2F18%2F35%2F7%2Fcikk_1183507%2Fjurassic.jpg&hash=034074b56df1252c6e969daf1701b2d8cac26f7a)

I've been on the one in Orlando. It was pretty awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 23, 2014, 04:16:30 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Feb 23, 2014, 04:01:32 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 23, 2014, 04:00:21 AM
Found a nice pic of the Jurassic Park Ride grand opening.  If I recall, Spielberg never went on it, lol.  Don't know about Goldblum though....

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmno.hu%2Fdata%2Fcikk%2F1%2F18%2F35%2F7%2Fcikk_1183507%2Fjurassic.jpg&hash=034074b56df1252c6e969daf1701b2d8cac26f7a)

I've been on the one in Orlando. It was pretty awesome.

It is.  I snuck my camera and the staff announced for no photos righ tbefore the T-Rex.  I still got a pic 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Feb 23, 2014, 04:45:03 AM
The one in Hollyweird is badass. The tour of the film locations was really neat to, got a few pics of TLW "Command" center and other spots. The Waterworld show and Back To The Future ride were just awesome too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 23, 2014, 04:54:08 AM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Feb 23, 2014, 04:45:03 AM
The one in Hollyweird is badass. The tour of the film locations was really neat to, got a few pics of TLW "Command" center and other spots. The Waterworld show and Back To The Future ride were just awesome too.

Post your Research Trailer pics!

Please.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Feb 23, 2014, 05:02:38 AM
I was there 12 years ago. Can't remember that location but it will take some serious digging to find those pics...

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.shakefire.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fuploads%2Fimages%2Fjp2.jpg&hash=639e85afc5d3831b97db2a885adb35f4477a8135) Stay Tuned! ;)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Feb 23, 2014, 05:07:55 AM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Feb 23, 2014, 05:02:38 AM
I was there 12 years ago. Can't remember that location but it will take some serious digging to find those pics...

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.shakefire.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fuploads%2Fimages%2Fjp2.jpg&hash=639e85afc5d3831b97db2a885adb35f4477a8135) Stay Tuned! ;)
[close]

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.shakefire.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fuploads%2Fimages%2Fjp3.jpg&hash=190cd263b4dc4304c70523557aa7461cc83f31f2)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Feb 23, 2014, 05:16:15 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Feb 23, 2014, 05:07:55 AM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Feb 23, 2014, 05:02:38 AM
I was there 12 years ago. Can't remember that location but it will take some serious digging to find those pics...

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.shakefire.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fuploads%2Fimages%2Fjp2.jpg&hash=639e85afc5d3831b97db2a885adb35f4477a8135) Stay Tuned! ;)
[close]

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.shakefire.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fuploads%2Fimages%2Fjp3.jpg&hash=190cd263b4dc4304c70523557aa7461cc83f31f2)
[close]

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth03.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2F200H%2Ff%2F2013%2F029%2F6%2Fe%2F3jurassic_park_helicopter_by_chicagocubsfan24-d5t4v9v.jpg&hash=7f45ebe0c875c711256d966515e2f7f4e0f2a614)
[close]

On another note, ahem DoomRulz, ever see one of these?

http://www.ebay.com/itm/ULTRA-RARE-LEO-MATTEL-HOT-WHEELS-9112-JURASSIC-PARK-HELICOPTOR-COLLECTORS-/380849885687?pt=Diecast_Vehicles&hash=item58ac6c11f7 (http://www.ebay.com/itm/ULTRA-RARE-LEO-MATTEL-HOT-WHEELS-9112-JURASSIC-PARK-HELICOPTOR-COLLECTORS-/380849885687?pt=Diecast_Vehicles&hash=item58ac6c11f7)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 23, 2014, 05:28:41 AM
Haha!

Doom better get on that!  Unless he already has one



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbTXjKAA_oI#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbTXjKAA_oI#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Feb 23, 2014, 07:17:08 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 23, 2014, 05:28:41 AM
Haha!

Doom better get on that!  Unless he already has one



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbTXjKAA_oI#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbTXjKAA_oI#ws)
BOY WHAT DO YOU THINK YOU ARE DOING POSTING FAN TRAILERS WITH NO INDICATION THAT IT'S A FAN TRAILER?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 23, 2014, 07:20:45 PM
To be fair, no one should really be expecting a teaser for a film that hasn't even begun shooting yet (unless it's Comic-Con season and they release a footage-less trailer just to begin building hype).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 23, 2014, 09:29:04 PM
I've just uploaded my latest Jurassic World vlog.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMgHR1q7Ss0#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMgHR1q7Ss0#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 23, 2014, 10:36:22 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Feb 23, 2014, 09:29:04 PM
I've just uploaded my latest Jurassic World vlog.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMgHR1q7Ss0#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMgHR1q7Ss0#ws)

:laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 24, 2014, 01:51:40 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Feb 23, 2014, 05:16:15 AM
On another note, ahem DoomRulz, ever see one of these?

http://www.ebay.com/itm/ULTRA-RARE-LEO-MATTEL-HOT-WHEELS-9112-JURASSIC-PARK-HELICOPTOR-COLLECTORS-/380849885687?pt=Diecast_Vehicles&hash=item58ac6c11f7 (http://www.ebay.com/itm/ULTRA-RARE-LEO-MATTEL-HOT-WHEELS-9112-JURASSIC-PARK-HELICOPTOR-COLLECTORS-/380849885687?pt=Diecast_Vehicles&hash=item58ac6c11f7)

Nice find. I did just drop a monstrous load on a new toy lot so stay tuned for that ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Feral_PRED on Feb 27, 2014, 01:52:39 AM
SCRIPT LEAK!
http://www.jplegacy.org/ (http://www.jplegacy.org/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Feb 27, 2014, 01:59:38 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 23, 2014, 07:20:45 PM
To be fair, no one should really be expecting a teaser for a film that hasn't even begun shooting yet (unless it's Comic-Con season and they release a footage-less trailer just to begin building hype).

Aww...It hasn't even begun shooting yet?!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 27, 2014, 04:33:16 AM
Quote from: Alienhunter15 on Feb 27, 2014, 01:52:39 AM
SCRIPT LEAK!
http://www.jplegacy.org/ (http://www.jplegacy.org/)

New park, figures. I wonder if the original park will be kept as ruins.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Feb 27, 2014, 12:13:01 PM
QuoteUpdate! Okay, thanks to thebluejaguar, we now have a good idea of where these pages originated. It seems that a user by the name of Robotpo from jplegacy.org came across "casting sides." What's that? Those are pages that actors are given to read during a cold audition. It doesn't mean that the characters and dialogue you see above will appear in the film. But, it doesn't completely rule them out either.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Feb 27, 2014, 12:54:01 PM
Spoiler
Not keen on the new park idea... oh well.  :-\ One of the scenes leaked seems like a repeat of the Muldoon speech about raptors... :P SO they'll be repeating beats from the first film... erhm... :/ wtf... It is a nice little bit of dialogue though...
[close]

Wonder what the new dinosaur is... :P

PLACE YOUR BETS NOW!

I say Carnotaurus :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Feb 27, 2014, 03:26:29 PM
But they're saying it's like smart and fast...

Hmm...

Maybe Albertosaurus? Or Utahraptor?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 27, 2014, 04:03:09 PM
Carnotaurus most likely, given the fanfare for it. Albertosaurus is of no real interest to anyone outside of paleontological circles and Utahraptor is just an big dromaeosaurid. JP's Velociraptors are pretty much Utahraptor with a different name.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Feb 27, 2014, 04:20:23 PM
They could be talking Sorna raptors.

Spoiler
ALAN
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Feb 27, 2014, 04:24:11 PM
^Nah this takes place in Nublar.

It might be a choice out of left field...

Giganotosaurus? Deinocheirus?
Or a made up dino. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2014, 04:24:41 PM
Troodon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Feb 27, 2014, 04:29:44 PM
A very redesigned Troodon then.. kinda how Velociraptor looks more like a Deinonychus... :p

Expect it to be larger and more muscled. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Feb 27, 2014, 06:51:26 PM
Betting on Troodon or Carnotaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 27, 2014, 06:56:12 PM
Still doesn't blatantly confirm it....

http://www.superherohype.com/news/293129-jeff-goldblum-back-for-independence-day-2-but-not-jurassic-world (http://www.superherohype.com/news/293129-jeff-goldblum-back-for-independence-day-2-but-not-jurassic-world)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Feb 27, 2014, 06:58:16 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Feb 27, 2014, 04:20:23 PM
They could be talking Sorna raptors.

Spoiler
ALAN
[close]

:laugh: Kiramid you crack me up mang.

No Goldblum, no fun. :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Feb 28, 2014, 07:44:45 PM
http://www.deadline.com/2014/02/vincent-donofrio-jurassic-world-villain-role/ (http://www.deadline.com/2014/02/vincent-donofrio-jurassic-world-villain-role/)

only if Vincent's character is somehow related to Vince Vaughn's character in Lost World
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 28, 2014, 08:53:48 PM
Screw that.  He was terrible in Escape Plan
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 28, 2014, 09:38:44 PM
I'm on board for him to be a villain.

Btw the new episode drops tonight! We discuss all the new Jurassic World news (including Donofrio), and interview Matt Winston!

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bhlr8KhIAAAvIRW.jpg)

All can be found at jpforever.com later tonight. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Feb 28, 2014, 10:16:47 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 28, 2014, 08:53:48 PM
Screw that.  He was terrible in Escape Plan

Yeah, he was a mess in Escape Plan. Very douchey.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 01, 2014, 02:49:46 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Feb 28, 2014, 09:38:44 PM
I'm on board for him to be a villain.

Btw the new episode drops tonight! We discuss all the new Jurassic World news (including Donofrio), and interview Matt Winston!

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bhlr8KhIAAAvIRW.jpg

All can be found at jpforever.com later tonight. ;)

That's great!  Can't wait to get to hearing it!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 01, 2014, 04:10:35 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Feb 28, 2014, 07:44:45 PM
http://www.deadline.com/2014/02/vincent-donofrio-jurassic-world-villain-role/ (http://www.deadline.com/2014/02/vincent-donofrio-jurassic-world-villain-role/)

only if Vincent's character is somehow related to Vince Vaughn's character in Lost World

I'm looking forward to seeing Irrfan Khan. He's becoming one of my favourite actors.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Mar 01, 2014, 04:20:05 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 01, 2014, 04:10:35 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Feb 28, 2014, 07:44:45 PM
http://www.deadline.com/2014/02/vincent-donofrio-jurassic-world-villain-role/ (http://www.deadline.com/2014/02/vincent-donofrio-jurassic-world-villain-role/)

only if Vincent's character is somehow related to Vince Vaughn's character in Lost World

I'm looking forward to seeing Irrfan Khan. He's becoming one of my favourite actors.

Yep, he was suitably sinister as Evil Apu in Amazing Spider-Man.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 03, 2014, 03:16:43 PM
https://twitter.com/Patel_Corp

viral marketing already gearing up?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 03, 2014, 03:59:23 PM
Wanna be hacked by Nedry? Here's your chance.

http://www.jurassicsystems.com/ (http://www.jurassicsystems.com/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 03, 2014, 05:06:31 PM
I want John Hammond to show up at the new park as an extreme enviromentalist and become the Nick Van-Owen of Jurassic World.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Mar 03, 2014, 05:08:17 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 03, 2014, 03:16:43 PM
https://twitter.com/Patel_Corp

viral marketing already gearing up?

Are they the new InGen?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Mar 03, 2014, 05:21:34 PM
"Building future horizons."

Meh, I liked it better when it was "Building Better Worlds".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 03, 2014, 05:24:13 PM
Probably just a shitty twitter fan page.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 03, 2014, 07:20:10 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Mar 03, 2014, 05:08:17 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 03, 2014, 03:16:43 PM
https://twitter.com/Patel_Corp

viral marketing already gearing up?

Are they the new InGen?

Well they did tweet...

"If you build upon the ruins of a past empire you'll understand, and respect, the power of the ground you stand on."

Maybe they took over InGen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 03, 2014, 08:13:20 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 03, 2014, 03:59:23 PM
Wanna be hacked by Nedry? Here's your chance.

http://www.jurassicsystems.com/ (http://www.jurassicsystems.com/)
Fantastic!!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Mar 03, 2014, 10:38:23 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 03, 2014, 03:16:43 PM
https://twitter.com/Patel_Corp

viral marketing already gearing up?
Why not BioSyn?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Mar 04, 2014, 12:15:59 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Mar 03, 2014, 05:21:34 PM
"Building future horizons."
That sounds f**king stupid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TheLoneSpoon on Mar 04, 2014, 12:17:41 AM
Quote from: Cal427eb on Mar 04, 2014, 12:15:59 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Mar 03, 2014, 05:21:34 PM
"Building future horizons."
That sounds f**king stupid.

01011001 01101111 01110101 00100111 01110010 01100101 00100000 01100110 01110101 01100011 01101011 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01110011 01110100 01110101 01110000 01101001 01100100
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Mar 04, 2014, 12:18:58 AM
Quote from: TheLoneSpoon on Mar 04, 2014, 12:17:41 AM
Quote from: Cal427eb on Mar 04, 2014, 12:15:59 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Mar 03, 2014, 05:21:34 PM
"Building future horizons."
That sounds f**king stupid.

01011001 01101111 01110101 00100111 01110010 01100101 00100000 01100110 01110101 01100011 01101011 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01110011 01110100 01110101 01110000 01101001 01100100
0101001101 101000011101010111 01000010000001110100011010000 110010100100000011001100 111010101100011011010110 01000000111 010101110000001000000111 10010110111101110 1010010000001101110 0111010101101101011100000111010 001111001001000000110010001110 101011011010111000001110100011110010010000001110 011011000010111010000100000011011110110111000100000011000010010000 0011101110110000101101100011011000010000 001101101011011110 1110010011011110110111000101110
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Mar 04, 2014, 12:21:09 AM
Quote from: TheLoneSpoon on Mar 04, 2014, 12:17:41 AM
Quote from: Cal427eb on Mar 04, 2014, 12:15:59 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Mar 03, 2014, 05:21:34 PM
"Building future horizons."
That sounds f**king stupid.

01011001 01101111 01110101 00100111 01110010 01100101 00100000 01100110 01110101 01100011 01101011 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01110011 01110100 01110101 01110000 01101001 01100100
:'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Mar 04, 2014, 12:22:11 AM
Great, the AIs are talking to each other now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TheLoneSpoon on Mar 04, 2014, 12:24:10 AM
Quote from: Cal427eb on Mar 04, 2014, 12:21:09 AM
Quote from: TheLoneSpoon on Mar 04, 2014, 12:17:41 AM
Quote from: Cal427eb on Mar 04, 2014, 12:15:59 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Mar 03, 2014, 05:21:34 PM
"Building future horizons."
That sounds f**king stupid.

01011001 01101111 01110101 00100111 01110010 01100101 00100000 01100110 01110101 01100011 01101011 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01110011 01110100 01110101 01110000 01101001 01100100
:'(

make a videogame dinosaur outta dah you motherf**ker

wub u

Quote from: KiramidHead on Mar 04, 2014, 12:22:11 AM
Great, the AIs are talking to each other now.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_mcu10mpmLQ1qktqch.jpg&hash=00fb04a763e8d99110d2fff22f5a9c78d7532860)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 04, 2014, 03:54:28 AM
Repainted my Papo dinos to look more Jurassic Park screen accurate.  I wonder if we'll see Spino again....

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bh2q5GJCMAAkswC.jpg:large)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Mar 04, 2014, 03:56:29 AM
I'd like to see him kill all the rexes in the first ten minutes. Okay, not really, but the internet exploding would be hilarious.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 04, 2014, 03:58:03 AM
Nice work! Maybe a spino vs. carno perhaps???
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Mar 04, 2014, 04:05:45 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 04, 2014, 03:54:28 AM
Repainted my Papo dinos to look more Jurassic Park screen accurate.  I wonder if we'll see Spino again....

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bh2q5GJCMAAkswC.jpg:large)

I'd rather not to be honest. Just have the focus on T.Rex as the main large dino again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Mar 04, 2014, 05:03:02 AM
It'd be nice if they at least acknowledged in a pamphlet of all of the dinos or something.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Mar 04, 2014, 11:48:38 AM
This just popped up on JP's facebook page:
http://www.buzzfeed.com/robinedds/which-jurassic-park-character-are-you (http://www.buzzfeed.com/robinedds/which-jurassic-park-character-are-you)

My result?
Spoiler

You got: Dennis Nedry
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs3-ak.buzzfeed.com%2Fstatic%2F2014-03%2Ftmp%2Fwebdr05%2F3%2F11%2Fanigif_28ae8ea2436e70ded1db57d982d70d61-0.gif&hash=f91eb72541950d20fbc433856cfc61ceae45da22)

You're only out for yourself, but what's wrong with that? No man is an island, but if you make enough money you could probably buy one.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 04, 2014, 12:52:51 PM
My result...

Spoiler
You got: Dilophosaurus

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs3-ak.buzzfeed.com%2Fstatic%2F2014-03%2Ftmp%2Fwebdr03%2F3%2F12%2Fanigif_e39f1d3eac95b1ddab9f2f5f582573c1-7.gif&hash=7f9b8834ce303abaf3e249718fbeb087a2327b15)

You're full of surprises. One minute you'll be cute as a button, the next you're spitting in the face of anyone who wrongs you.

Better watch out Vertigo. ::)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Mar 04, 2014, 01:06:12 PM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Mar 04, 2014, 04:05:45 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 04, 2014, 03:54:28 AM
Repainted my Papo dinos to look more Jurassic Park screen accurate.  I wonder if we'll see Spino again....

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bh2q5GJCMAAkswC.jpg:large)

I'd rather not to be honest. Just have the focus on T.Rex as the main large dino again.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmimg.ugo.com%2F201106%2F7%2F5%2F1%2F199157%2Ftyrannosaurusrex.jpg&hash=039a8f8718c4bbe5a8d71972895f7c8e5a78032d)

My life is a lie
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 04, 2014, 01:48:57 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Mar 04, 2014, 11:48:38 AM
This just popped up on JP's facebook page:
http://www.buzzfeed.com/robinedds/which-jurassic-park-character-are-you (http://www.buzzfeed.com/robinedds/which-jurassic-park-character-are-you)

My result?
Spoiler

You got: Dennis Nedry
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs3-ak.buzzfeed.com%2Fstatic%2F2014-03%2Ftmp%2Fwebdr05%2F3%2F11%2Fanigif_28ae8ea2436e70ded1db57d982d70d61-0.gif&hash=f91eb72541950d20fbc433856cfc61ceae45da22)

You're only out for yourself, but what's wrong with that? No man is an island, but if you make enough money you could probably buy one.
[close]

I've had several results but, my first two were 1) Dilophosaurus and 2) Ian Malcolm.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Runner on Mar 04, 2014, 01:53:51 PM
Quote from: Gate on Mar 04, 2014, 01:06:12 PM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Mar 04, 2014, 04:05:45 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 04, 2014, 03:54:28 AM
Repainted my Papo dinos to look more Jurassic Park screen accurate.  I wonder if we'll see Spino again....

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bh2q5GJCMAAkswC.jpg:large)

I'd rather not to be honest. Just have the focus on T.Rex as the main large dino again.
http://mimg.ugo.com/201106/7/5/1/199157/tyrannosaurusrex.jpg

My life is a lie
What's wrong?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Mar 04, 2014, 04:10:15 PM
Quote from: Gate on Mar 04, 2014, 01:06:12 PMhttp://mimg.ugo.com/201106/7/5/1/199157/tyrannosaurusrex.jpg

My life is a lie

Don't worry, the pic is total bullshit. Outside the north pole, Tyrannosaurus would bake to a crisp with that much tuftiness. It probably didn't have any integument at all, despite a couple of much smaller and earlier tyrannosauroids being fluffy.
I can't see exactly what most of the smaller theropods are, but the oviraptorid (and probably the others) would have had a full feathery coating, and wings (not flight capable - used for brooding nests, and possibly providing lift while running or balance atop moving objects). They're also pictured with "bunny hands", which is a position most theropods couldn't adopt. Hands were angled sideways, and typically folded close into the body.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomorphine on Mar 04, 2014, 08:09:01 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFwHELWXtB0#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFwHELWXtB0#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Mar 04, 2014, 10:12:38 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Mar 04, 2014, 04:10:15 PM
Quote from: Gate on Mar 04, 2014, 01:06:12 PMhttp://mimg.ugo.com/201106/7/5/1/199157/tyrannosaurusrex.jpg

My life is a lie

Don't worry, the pic is total bullshit. Outside the north pole, Tyrannosaurus would bake to a crisp with that much tuftiness. It probably didn't have any integument at all, despite a couple of much smaller and earlier tyrannosauroids being fluffy.
I can't see exactly what most of the smaller theropods are, but the oviraptorid (and probably the others) would have had a full feathery coating, and wings (not flight capable - used for brooding nests, and possibly providing lift while running or balance atop moving objects). They're also pictured with "bunny hands", which is a position most theropods couldn't adopt. Hands were angled sideways, and typically folded close into the body.

That's why I have to commend Crichton for his explanation into how the DNA works in Jurassic Park. Despite the amber DNA having a half life of virtually 500 years, that's kind of disproven. However, the dinosaurs of Jurassic Park can always have variation due to two factors.

a. The fact that they used reptillian DNA to fill in the gaps (most likely, frog, lizard, and bird)
b. The fact that there were so many subspecies of the fossils we've found, which are rare enough as is since we probably have no knowledge of 80% of the extinct Archosaurs and other life.

Although, I do raise one point: Dinosaurs have now been recently thought to be endothermic... wouldn't your statement on being burnt to a crisp be baseless if compared to modern birds?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Mar 04, 2014, 11:23:37 PM
Nope.

Integument (feathers, down, fur, hair) is typically for controlling body temperature, except specialised structures like the pennaceous flight feathers in birds. If the integument is VERY sparse (as in adult elephants) it can help keep the animal cool, but in the vast majority of cases, it's used to stop heat escaping through the skin, providing thermal insulation.

However, heavier animals tend to have higher body mass in comparison to surface area - so a lower percentage of body heat will be dissipated through the skin. Basically, size acts as thermal insulation all on its own. This is why giant animals aren't furry (or feathery...) unless they live in cold environments, like mammoths.
Similarly, normally furry animals develop shorter hair or even become bald if they adapt to a hot environment - our own genus is a prime example of that.

Tyrannosaurus obviously was a huge animal, weighing as much as the very largest elephants, and would have needed to be far more active and energetic. It would have had major problems keeping cool in the vast majority of environments, and may have had special adaptations to aid this that haven't fossilised. But it probably didn't have any kind of integument. The Tyrannosaurus skin samples that have fossilised have all been scaly, and in modern birds, feathered areas (even sparsely-feathered areas like the neck of a vulture) tend to have smooth, wrinkly or noduley skin - it's the bare areas where you find scales.

There is of course the possibility that protofeathers may have existed on some part of the body for which we don't have skin samples, but this is purely speculation. You could just as plausibly posit that it had a two-metre-high pink keratin quiff. As far as we know, Tyrannosaurus was the classic scaly beast.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Mar 04, 2014, 11:27:06 PM
I got Dilophosaurus on that quiz. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 05, 2014, 01:26:04 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Mar 04, 2014, 11:23:37 PM
Nope.

Integument (feathers, down, fur, hair) is typically for controlling body temperature, except specialised structures like the pennaceous flight feathers in birds. If the integument is VERY sparse (as in adult elephants) it can help keep the animal cool, but in the vast majority of cases, it's used to stop heat escaping through the skin, providing thermal insulation.

However, heavier animals tend to have higher body mass in comparison to surface area - so a lower percentage of body heat will be dissipated through the skin. Basically, size acts as thermal insulation all on its own. This is why giant animals aren't furry (or feathery...) unless they live in cold environments, like mammoths.
Similarly, normally furry animals develop shorter hair or even become bald if they adapt to a hot environment - our own genus is a prime example of that.

Tyrannosaurus obviously was a huge animal, weighing as much as the very largest elephants, and would have needed to be far more active and energetic. It would have had major problems keeping cool in the vast majority of environments, and may have had special adaptations to aid this that haven't fossilised. But it probably didn't have any kind of integument. The Tyrannosaurus skin samples that have fossilised have all been scaly, and in modern birds, feathered areas (even sparsely-feathered areas like the neck of a vulture) tend to have smooth, wrinkly or noduley skin - it's the bare areas where you find scales.

There is of course the possibility that protofeathers may have existed on some part of the body for which we don't have skin samples, but this is purely speculation. You could just as plausibly posit that it had a two-metre-high pink keratin quiff. As far as we know, Tyrannosaurus was the classic scaly beast.

I would contend the largest theropods likely had feathers when they were young, as a sort of downy layer to help keep warm in the early stages of childhood and began to lose them as they aged. Like you said, a larger animal isn't going to stay cool with a warm coat.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Mar 05, 2014, 06:55:03 PM
Agreed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 05, 2014, 08:54:09 PM
Irrfan to undergo flight training for Jurassic World

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Irrfan-to-undergo-flight-training-for-Jurassic-World/articleshow/31480188.cms?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=renuka-vyavahare (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Irrfan-to-undergo-flight-training-for-Jurassic-World/articleshow/31480188.cms?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=renuka-vyavahare)



Here we go....

http://www.patel-corp.com/ (http://www.patel-corp.com/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 06, 2014, 11:10:42 PM
Viral  marketing.. starring our very own ALIEN3!  :laugh: (doing his best Peter Weyland impersonation).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgADUIojWHY (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgADUIojWHY)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Mar 06, 2014, 11:59:54 PM
Is that site fan-made?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 07, 2014, 03:22:07 AM
Yea  :D

Alien³ got me with it on twitter.  Very well done, sir.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 07, 2014, 09:36:18 AM
All in a days work ladies and gents. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 07, 2014, 12:25:24 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Mar 06, 2014, 11:10:42 PM
Viral  marketing.. starring our very own ALIEN3!  :laugh: (doing his best Peter Weyland impersonation).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgADUIojWHY (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgADUIojWHY)

Check it out guys, Guy Pearce's younger brother, lol.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 07, 2014, 06:05:31 PM
Did you ever put up that new instagram pic of new arrivals or did they not arrive yet?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 07, 2014, 06:19:54 PM
Nah, they haven't shown up yet. It's gonna be a while.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 08, 2014, 02:36:18 AM
Awww! Guess we will have to wait then. While I'm here: I purchased Carnosaur, Carnosaur 2 and Carnosaur 3 DVDs today! Never seen 2 or 3 but I've heard they are just as hilariously bad as the original! :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 08, 2014, 02:12:42 PM
A guy I once knew actually said to me he think Carnosaur is a better movie than JP. I really don't know which drugs he was on when he said that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 08, 2014, 08:13:06 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fen%2F4%2F4d%2FCarnosaur-2-poster.jpg&hash=8701d76dc71e2d93f64894fdbe0fe3a4fd9f1a22)

Note the top comment on the cover: "Put ALIENS and JURASSIC PARK in a blender and C2 is what you get." - Seattle Chronicle

Apparently Seattle was on the chronic when blazing up this review :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 09, 2014, 05:52:59 AM
Wow.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Mar 09, 2014, 05:58:45 AM
I just can't get over the fact that it somehow won an award.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 09, 2014, 05:59:40 AM
A Razzie?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Mar 09, 2014, 06:00:18 AM
A "Golden Scroll," whatever the hell that is.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 09, 2014, 07:26:36 AM
Another comment (third one down):  "C2 is the film Jurassic Park should have been." :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Mar 09, 2014, 03:56:52 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 08, 2014, 08:13:06 PM
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/4d/Carnosaur-2-poster.jpg

Note the top comment on the cover: "Put ALIENS and JURASSIC PARK in a blender and C2 is what you get." - Seattle Chronicle

Apparently Seattle was on the chronic when blazing up this review :P

lol it's bottom half is so tiny
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 09, 2014, 07:23:01 PM
Jurassic Park raptors:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fshutupdad.files.wordpress.com%2F2012%2F05%2Fjp.jpg&hash=d02367354442149bd36e13d0b004248ae3a9591f)

Carnosaur raptors:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi500.listal.com%2Fimage%2F2612065%2F500full.jpg&hash=571ee69cc68a975834d89253967e709bbb86fe9c)
And someone actually said Carnosaur was better than JP to DoomRulz??? Hilarious!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Mar 09, 2014, 09:47:31 PM
No pic of Carnosaur raptors, Fiorina. I want so bad to see. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Mar 09, 2014, 10:00:48 PM
Quote from: RagingDragon on Mar 09, 2014, 09:47:31 PM
No pic of Carnosaur raptors, Fiorina. I want so bad to see. :laugh:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi64.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fh174%2Fchasezilla%2FSciFi%2520Monsters%2FCarnosaurRaptor001.jpg&hash=397d93036baf152c8893618feabf002341494378)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Mar 09, 2014, 10:06:38 PM
I haven't seen any of the Carnosaur movies all the way through. I have seen the movie that used stock footage from them, though. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 09, 2014, 10:39:50 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Mar 09, 2014, 10:00:48 PM
Quote from: RagingDragon on Mar 09, 2014, 09:47:31 PM
No pic of Carnosaur raptors, Fiorina. I want so bad to see. :laugh:

http://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h174/chasezilla/SciFi%20Monsters/CarnosaurRaptor001.jpg
Thank you, for some reason my image isn't showing up! Wacky aren't dey?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Mar 10, 2014, 03:56:36 AM
The derp raptors! I still love them though. :laugh: I'm just biased towards el Raptor.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 10, 2014, 04:02:46 AM
Pfft, who needs Carnosaur? Raptor Island is where it's at 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 10, 2014, 04:27:51 AM
Lets not degrade this epic thread any further... :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Mar 10, 2014, 04:34:17 AM
Okay 8)

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F24.media.tumblr.com%2Fb01e174f1564ce15c60ade6d79ef6933%2Ftumblr_mihcokkxYU1r3eyr4o1_500.jpg&hash=4db861b891a21b14eeac8a0b545d134f12d3b6ea)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 10, 2014, 04:49:53 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.2d-x.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F04%2Falangrant.jpg&hash=6be0a4d089c13c5520881cae7ce298739e1b386c)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 10, 2014, 12:41:32 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 09, 2014, 07:23:01 PM
Jurassic Park raptors:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fshutupdad.files.wordpress.com%2F2012%2F05%2Fjp.jpg&hash=d02367354442149bd36e13d0b004248ae3a9591f)

Carnosaur raptors:

http://i500.listal.com/image/2612065/500full.jpg
And someone actually said Carnosaur was better than JP to DoomRulz??? Hilarious!

The person who said it to me is one of those folks who thinks sci-fi and horror movies need to be loaded with gore and violence. That pretty much says what his taste in films is like.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Mar 13, 2014, 11:41:35 AM
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2F144d1d53442edbabc9cc0a200c814c09%2Ftumblr_n2bvwr3GJX1tvnodno1_250.gif&hash=88563be4349be0089f21b4489120fd04f45b7368)
Jurassic intensifies
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Mar 13, 2014, 11:45:19 AM
Quote from: Gilfryd on Mar 13, 2014, 11:41:35 AM
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2F144d1d53442edbabc9cc0a200c814c09%2Ftumblr_n2bvwr3GJX1tvnodno1_250.gif&hash=88563be4349be0089f21b4489120fd04f45b7368)
Jurassic intensifies
[close]
I own that cover.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 13, 2014, 12:37:25 PM
Same. Actually, I still only have all three JP films on VHS :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 13, 2014, 02:23:56 PM
Lol, I had my sister get her cinema-studies teacher back in high school to give me the one from his copy; since I lost mine as a child when taking it out and looking at it all the time  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 13, 2014, 02:29:44 PM
I don't even recall how I lost mine. Thankfully, eBay has since come to the rescue 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 14, 2014, 11:27:50 AM
New arrival last night! Some of you might remember this one.

http://instagram.com/p/lgeTTXlEmW/ (http://instagram.com/p/lgeTTXlEmW/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 14, 2014, 12:43:25 PM
I remember the picture featured, one of the coolest pics from the film!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 14, 2014, 01:15:34 PM
The irony is that the Rex never opened her eyes in that shot. At least, it's not seen in the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Mar 15, 2014, 12:54:01 AM
Colin Trevorrow
@colintrevorrow
Location scout. http://pic.twitter.com/Oc2IDYRh43 (http://pic.twitter.com/Oc2IDYRh43)

Media preview


(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BiurPLzCUAAyycO.jpg:large)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Mar 15, 2014, 01:59:08 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Mar 15, 2014, 12:54:01 AM
Colin Trevorrow
@colintrevorrow
Location scout. http://pic.twitter.com/Oc2IDYRh43 (http://pic.twitter.com/Oc2IDYRh43)

Media preview


(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BiurPLzCUAAyycO.jpg:large)

In the bushes. Straight ahead. I got her...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Mar 15, 2014, 02:00:10 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Mar 15, 2014, 01:59:08 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Mar 15, 2014, 12:54:01 AM
Colin Trevorrow
@colintrevorrow
Location scout. http://pic.twitter.com/Oc2IDYRh43 (http://pic.twitter.com/Oc2IDYRh43)

Media preview


(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BiurPLzCUAAyycO.jpg:large)

In the bushes. Straight ahead. I got her...

Clever girl...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Mar 15, 2014, 06:26:08 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 14, 2014, 11:27:50 AM
New arrival last night! Some of you might remember this one.

http://instagram.com/p/lgeTTXlEmW/ (http://instagram.com/p/lgeTTXlEmW/)
Dude awesome. ;D Do want!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 16, 2014, 05:08:25 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=716BqDv49lA (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=716BqDv49lA)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Mar 18, 2014, 04:18:33 PM
Dr. Henry Wu is in Jurassic World! http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=116148 (http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=116148)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Mar 18, 2014, 04:21:10 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Mar 18, 2014, 04:18:33 PM
Dr. Henry Wu is in Jurassic World! http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=116148 (http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=116148)
Awesome. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 18, 2014, 04:23:26 PM
Yup, that's pretty awesome. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 18, 2014, 05:37:42 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Mar 18, 2014, 04:18:33 PM
Dr. Henry Wu is in Jurassic World! http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=116148 (http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=116148)

Now I'm quite excited for this film 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Mar 18, 2014, 08:12:31 PM
Hell yeah!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Mar 18, 2014, 08:14:23 PM
Wu-hoo!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 18, 2014, 09:31:09 PM
That's great news as it brings the franchise basically full-circle, in a sense.  Although expected, it's still a shame that they're not going to even give at least one original lead a cameo.  Hopefully they'll at least mention them by name, if not, refer to their experiences in past films as was done for TLW in the JPIII Dr. Gant presentation scene. 

Another note, which I find interesting in Trevorrow's response is that Dr. Wu can basically now flourish under new management after John Hammond's loss of InGen.  It will be interesting to see how Patel Corp treats their employees, but I hope they still mention something about Dodgson's espionage with Biosyn.  Maybe Dodgson tried to contact Wu before hand?

Eh.  I'm getting ahead of myself.

Also, here's the rest of the insightful interview....

http://m.ign.com/articles/2014/03/18/exclusive-interview-with-the-director-of-jurassic-world (http://m.ign.com/articles/2014/03/18/exclusive-interview-with-the-director-of-jurassic-world)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 19, 2014, 12:14:13 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Mar 18, 2014, 04:18:33 PM
Dr. Henry Wu is in Jurassic World! http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=116148 (http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=116148)
My hopes are confirmed! :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Mar 21, 2014, 09:11:56 AM
Omar Sy have joined the cast.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/KingPatel/news/?a=96497 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/KingPatel/news/?a=96497)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Mar 21, 2014, 11:40:53 AM
I wonder if he'll get eaten by dinos like every black guy in this saga.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Mar 21, 2014, 11:58:56 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Mar 21, 2014, 11:40:53 AM
I wonder if he'll get eaten by dinos like every black guy in this saga.
Oh shit
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 21, 2014, 12:01:41 PM
Hey, Samuel L. Jackson's arm made it out just fine >:(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Mar 21, 2014, 01:43:55 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Mar 21, 2014, 11:40:53 AM
I wonder if he'll get eaten by dinos like every black guy in this saga.

Let's review!

Yep! Right off the Bat. They should have had him wearing a red shirt.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjpencyclopedia%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F04%2Fjophery.png&hash=5baf66335c661cc8d8e6c57cae0dd2567114c184)


Spoiler

At least Arnold got to second base one last time.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.shakefire.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fuploads%2Fimages%2Fjp34.jpg&hash=10f5699e34317996a357c87569c6db935bfc0bb6)

Spoiler
Deleted Ajay dailgouge from the Tall Grass scene: "Stop screaming and shut your eyes! They won't see you!"
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fyoubredraptors.files.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F01%2Fvlcsnap-2011-01-29-11h06m44s35.png&hash=72645eafed31d991fbcd8c59000725b0c52ec54c)
Spoiler
"Too late!"
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-3edEy0bswGg%2FUqIrShh9FDI%2FAAAAAAAAKDc%2FzUdlQvYC28U%2Fs1600%2Flong%2Bgrass%2Bpounce.gif&hash=aa03ecbb4146f1704df7a2d4ada95203d654bb32)

Spoiler
"I'm tired of these motherf**kin' dinosaurs on this motherf**kin' pla-"CRUNCH
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1208.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fcc377%2FBatChainPuller%2FNashGash_zps36bb8661.png&hash=fa5f57780240240b668596dd90ff801039cf5806)

Spoiler
It's okay though ... she avenged them all.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.cinemasquid.com%2Fblu-ray%2Ftitles%2Fthe-lost-world-jurassic-park%2F9e2282b2-18b6-48af-8c7a-96358bd1f31f%2Fscreenshot-med-34.jpg&hash=8b0e1b7fcf8c7696ae116512a387903e62b60d66)"I like the way you die, dino."
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 21, 2014, 01:56:45 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Mar 21, 2014, 09:11:56 AM
Omar Sy have joined the cast.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/KingPatel/news/?a=96497 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/KingPatel/news/?a=96497)

Is this buddy who was fed the energy meatball by Shaw?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 21, 2014, 04:09:38 PM
First character death is probably in his contract, lol

Nah, he should do great in this :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Mar 21, 2014, 04:52:08 PM
Well, now I'm gonna be disappointed if Bishop doesn't kick some dino ass.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Mar 21, 2014, 05:58:44 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 21, 2014, 01:56:45 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Mar 21, 2014, 09:11:56 AM
Omar Sy have joined the cast.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/KingPatel/news/?a=96497 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/KingPatel/news/?a=96497)
Is this buddy who was fed the energy meatball by Shaw?
No. He's playing Bishop in the new movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Mar 21, 2014, 08:32:07 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Mar 21, 2014, 01:43:55 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Mar 21, 2014, 11:40:53 AM
I wonder if he'll get eaten by dinos like every black guy in this saga.

Let's review!

Yep! Right off the Bat. They should have had him wearing a red shirt.
http://www.jplegacy.org/jpencyclopedia/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/jophery.png


Spoiler

At least Arnold got to second base one last time.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.shakefire.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fuploads%2Fimages%2Fjp34.jpg&hash=10f5699e34317996a357c87569c6db935bfc0bb6)

Spoiler
Deleted Ajay dailgouge from the Tall Grass scene: "Stop screaming and shut your eyes! They won't see you!"
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fyoubredraptors.files.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F01%2Fvlcsnap-2011-01-29-11h06m44s35.png&hash=72645eafed31d991fbcd8c59000725b0c52ec54c)
Spoiler
"Too late!"
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-3edEy0bswGg%2FUqIrShh9FDI%2FAAAAAAAAKDc%2FzUdlQvYC28U%2Fs1600%2Flong%2Bgrass%2Bpounce.gif&hash=aa03ecbb4146f1704df7a2d4ada95203d654bb32)

Spoiler
"I'm tired of these motherf**kin' dinosaurs on this motherf**kin' pla-"CRUNCH
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1208.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fcc377%2FBatChainPuller%2FNashGash_zps36bb8661.png&hash=fa5f57780240240b668596dd90ff801039cf5806)

Spoiler
It's okay though ... she avenged them all.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.cinemasquid.com%2Fblu-ray%2Ftitles%2Fthe-lost-world-jurassic-park%2F9e2282b2-18b6-48af-8c7a-96358bd1f31f%2Fscreenshot-med-34.jpg&hash=8b0e1b7fcf8c7696ae116512a387903e62b60d66)"I like the way you die, dino."
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
The genius in this post compelled me to rub my face on the screen. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 22, 2014, 03:42:27 AM
(https://fbcdn-photos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/t1.0-0/s720x720/1926865_730901413611431_1129085747_n.jpg)

Done by my friend Julien Roméo



QuoteColin Trevorrow @colintrevorrow

@osteo_timothy Three great actors yet to be announced. None of them are men. Hang in there, Tim.

9:19pm - 21 Mar 14
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 22, 2014, 03:43:38 AM
Good cast so far. Cant wait to see them all die. :p
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 22, 2014, 01:33:13 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 22, 2014, 03:42:27 AM
(https://fbcdn-photos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/t1.0-0/s720x720/1926865_730901413611431_1129085747_n.jpg)

Done by my friend Julien Roméo



Gorgeous! I like the choice of perspective.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Mar 22, 2014, 03:26:55 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 22, 2014, 03:42:27 AM
(https://fbcdn-photos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/t1.0-0/s720x720/1926865_730901413611431_1129085747_n.jpg)

Done by my friend Julien Roméo

Sweet! Did you're friend crawl up insider one of those T-Rex heads at a traveling exhibit and snap that pic? That's how I would have done it!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The1PerfectOrganism on Mar 22, 2014, 04:08:12 PM
Not especially hyped but I hope it's good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 23, 2014, 01:32:17 AM
He's a CG artist.



Concept Art for Jurassic World

(https://i.imgur.com/LyILHCA.jpg)

(https://i.imgur.com/fLAeMdC.jpg)

http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=121#comments (http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=121#comments)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 23, 2014, 02:29:32 AM
I think I'm gonna shit myself, that's amazing!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Mar 23, 2014, 02:33:08 AM
It looks a lot like the cover art from old pulp sci-fi magazines. I like it. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 23, 2014, 02:35:05 AM
^Agreed!

Can't wait to see the Raptor pen!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Mar 23, 2014, 02:44:17 AM
Reminds me of the old Epcot Center concept art back in the late 70's. It's what my minds-eye sorta saw when I first heard the concept of the book.

Spoiler

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fthemeparkinvestigator.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F08%2F2167532666_c680d169b9_b.jpg&hash=fe50d7c1eff7261835b3593579bcde5633d49f87)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.themeparkreview.com%2Fforum%2Ffiles%2Fepcot_center_ticket_tpr_534.jpg&hash=4b75266ecbb3ec677a8cc5309a15e2c4669d9b44)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsuperradnow.files.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F09%2Fryman-mcginnis_epcot_transpohub_lgpm.jpg&hash=b9984dc22c9fc24ae4f5c3a09e57cfaf44a2583e)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jimhillmedia.com%2Fmb%2Fimages%2Fupload%2FEpcot-Concept-Painting-web.jpg&hash=ea1dca3fb85b15684883e63b09e3ebd83d636e8e)
[close]

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Mar 23, 2014, 03:03:04 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 23, 2014, 01:32:17 AM
He's a CG artist.



Concept Art for Jurassic World

(https://i.imgur.com/LyILHCA.jpg)

(https://i.imgur.com/fLAeMdC.jpg)

http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=121#comments (http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=121#comments)

Holy f**k shit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 23, 2014, 04:11:52 AM
Very nice. Consider me a fan of the art :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 23, 2014, 02:08:12 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 23, 2014, 01:32:17 AM
He's a CG artist.



Concept Art for Jurassic World

(https://i.imgur.com/LyILHCA.jpg)

(https://i.imgur.com/fLAeMdC.jpg)

http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=121#comments (http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=121#comments)

Most impressive. It really does look like a Jurassic Park of the future.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DaddyYautja on Mar 24, 2014, 12:33:12 AM
So this is sort of a remake of the first film?
They made another park and crap is going to go wrong again?
But since this is part four they gotta up the ante so instead of just opening doors the raptors learn how to use guns?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FgfyPSVg.jpg&hash=e48a1088683c0a5bf804f35042bd95dd8fe2a6e0)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Mar 24, 2014, 12:37:41 AM
I'm sure it will be a remake in the sense that Predators was a remake of Predator. Basically the same but with a new spin while acknowledging its predecessor. 

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 24, 2014, 12:39:44 AM
But Predators was already Jurassic Park III :P

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg3.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20120620140209%2Favp%2Fimages%2Fb%2Fb1%2FWindow97.PNG&hash=46c239c8bbaede345f6608f47ced414403aaeab6)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg1.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20120330072041%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2F7%2F7b%2FRexvsspino01.jpg&hash=7235493acdd59266e4d9dea2a5408d1d180bca73)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Mar 24, 2014, 12:48:29 AM
Does that make Predator 2 The Lost World?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg3.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20111209021810%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2F9%2F96%2FJPTLWRexRoarSanDiego.png&hash=89a7380d5f66a7dc8384a73d8edb5953db5bee9a)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs3.amazonaws.com%2Fauteurs_production%2Fimages%2Ffilm%2Fpredator-2%2Fw856%2Fpredator-2.jpg&hash=afaed57b0532a53fb2928be47910f15681cba163)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 24, 2014, 12:56:36 AM
Only if Predator is Jurassic Park!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg3.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20101118172113%2Favp%2Fimages%2F3%2F3d%2FDutch.jpg&hash=0b130b2aa3bd5f35bfe46cc56fa5b1c2f95f78c4)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.creativexp.co.uk%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F06%2Fmuldoon.jpg&hash=7a90cb7999b5f24394695f4a9f013b691216c710)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Mar 24, 2014, 01:07:33 AM
Yep!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gb_gho1eGM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gb_gho1eGM#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Mn6O4blB1A#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Mn6O4blB1A#ws)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blogcdn.com%2Fwww.mandatory.com%2Fmedia%2F2013%2F08%2Fscreen-shot-2013-07-31-at-3.02.40-pm.png&hash=dfd27e1cf4bfb2daf9ba3966e3de90ff43e4d8aa)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcontent.hollywire.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2FVelociraptor.jpg&hash=e74643f2cecd861cf950e0e06903ea964d62a47b)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 24, 2014, 03:09:14 AM
My God!  I never realized!  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DaddyYautja on Mar 24, 2014, 03:13:36 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 24, 2014, 03:09:14 AM
My God!  I never realized!  :D

Seriously...... it sort of makes sense.   :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 24, 2014, 01:51:15 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 24, 2014, 12:56:36 AM
Only if Predator is Jurassic Park!

http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20101118172113/avp/images/3/3d/Dutch.jpg
http://www.creativexp.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/muldoon.jpg

Lmao, I like this analogy. Amazingly...I can't tell which film I dislike more: JP 3 or Predators.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 25, 2014, 07:26:06 PM
Very basic teaser was apparently shown at Cinemacon today.

http://www.jurassicworld.org/ (http://www.jurassicworld.org/)

"JURASSIC WORLD tease was a lot of CGI and voice over. No real footage. Just reminding people of the world and what's coming"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 25, 2014, 10:33:50 PM
Well it's something at least.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 26, 2014, 02:31:47 AM
Hope they release it, at least  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ShadowPred on Mar 27, 2014, 01:59:35 AM
AWWWW YEAH!

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/GhostRiderfan1/news/?a=96860 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/GhostRiderfan1/news/?a=96860)

QuoteStar of "Drinking Buddies" joins the cast of Colin Trevorrow's upcoming fourth installment of the Jurassic Park franchise
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 27, 2014, 02:13:45 AM
Quote from: ShadowPred on Mar 27, 2014, 01:59:35 AM
QuoteStar of "Drinking Buddies" joins the cast of Colin Trevorrow's upcoming fourth installment of the Jurassic Park franchise
Don't know why, but I just pictured someone feeding dilphosaurs vodka and them puking up poisonous spit everywhere in a drunken scene :P :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vepariga on Mar 27, 2014, 07:26:03 AM
LOL wtf is with that teaser? is it a petrodactyl love story? whats with the logo? like a man and his dinosaur avenger team.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 27, 2014, 08:38:52 AM
^ That teaser you saw was made before Colin Trevorrow got to work on the film.

This new teaser, made specifically for that presentation, hasnt leaked yet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Mar 27, 2014, 08:49:05 AM
Quote from: ShadowPred on Mar 27, 2014, 01:59:35 AM
AWWWW YEAH!

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/GhostRiderfan1/news/?a=96860 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/GhostRiderfan1/news/?a=96860)

QuoteStar of "Drinking Buddies" joins the cast of Colin Trevorrow's upcoming fourth installment of the Jurassic Park franchise

Excellent.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vepariga on Mar 27, 2014, 10:58:04 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Mar 27, 2014, 08:38:52 AM
^ That teaser you saw was made before Colin Trevorrow got to work on the film.

This new teaser, made specifically for that presentation, hasnt leaked yet.

oh goood lol, cuz watching petrodactyls carry off surfers and go up and down didnt really say 'jurassic park' lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 27, 2014, 09:20:48 PM
Pterodactyls.

Petrodactyls sounds like some kind of flying reptile made of stone.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 28, 2014, 11:03:22 AM
Holy shit, it's Omegazilla, back from the dead!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 28, 2014, 11:51:48 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Mar 27, 2014, 08:38:52 AM
^ That teaser you saw was made before Colin Trevorrow got to work on the film.

This new teaser, made specifically for that presentation, hasnt leaked yet.

^ and it wasn't for Jurassic World the film. It was for a game which had nothing to do with the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 28, 2014, 06:39:19 PM
http://www.nola.com/movies/index.ssf/2014/03/jurassic_world_looking_for_tho.html (http://www.nola.com/movies/index.ssf/2014/03/jurassic_world_looking_for_tho.html)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 28, 2014, 06:57:22 PM
Fully functioning park. yup.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 28, 2014, 08:06:58 PM
Aparantly they will be filming exterior shots of San Diego as well. 

Does this mean we'll be getting the incident in TLW references?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 28, 2014, 08:24:41 PM
That would be pretty neat.

Although I think they're just filming at the Zoo there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 28, 2014, 09:43:01 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Mar 28, 2014, 08:06:58 PM
Aparantly they will be filming exterior shots of San Diego as well. 

Does this mean we'll be getting the incident in TLW references?

That would be nice but I thought this film was a semi-reboot? If that's true, they might ignore it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Mar 28, 2014, 11:56:20 PM
I haven't read anything about a reboot, just set many yearsafter the first movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ryu on Mar 31, 2014, 11:46:26 AM

www.youtube.com/watch?v=gh4zvQfDhi0 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gh4zvQfDhi0)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 31, 2014, 01:16:43 PM
http://instagram.com/p/mLNsTZFEq1/ (http://instagram.com/p/mLNsTZFEq1/)

This was given to me yesterday.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 31, 2014, 01:28:38 PM
Nice!

Just a heads up Episode 12 of Jurassic Cast will be released soon!

Who will be our next guest...

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BjPYKhcCYAAcsW1.png)

Plus we''re holding a competition in which you could win...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fecx.images-amazon.com%2Fimages%2FI%2F51BBDDG353L.jpg&hash=c2b8c36ebb6897964854b4b984beacc9d8bcc67f)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fecx.images-amazon.com%2Fimages%2FI%2F51oFqDNXkkL._SL500_AA300_.jpg&hash=b03d2fe40877499559fdf86501464c15f6c202d0)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BjwfCXYIQAAcN8b.jpg)

More information over at Jpforever.com
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Mar 31, 2014, 01:40:33 PM
I want that RAPTOR. X)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 31, 2014, 01:46:35 PM
Holy geez, how the hell did you get all of them together?!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 31, 2014, 01:47:41 PM
My co-host is emptying his attic.

Spoiler
Bastard didn't ask if I wanted it :P
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 31, 2014, 01:50:12 PM
I meant the interviewees for the show, lol. Do you have a specific way of contacting them?

Also, just to toot my own horn here...40, 000 posts for moi! And the crowning one comes in this thread 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Mar 31, 2014, 01:57:36 PM
Hopefully the Emperor will finally get his lazy arse off the Golden Throne of Holy Terra and save mankind in your 40,001st post.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 31, 2014, 02:00:21 PM
Um...

You'll have to settle for the honour of me replying to you specifically with my 40 002 post ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 31, 2014, 02:00:25 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 31, 2014, 01:50:12 PM
I meant the interviewees for the show, lol. Do you have a specific way of contacting them?

Haha, silly me.

Through their managers, agents or just tweeting and asking them directly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 31, 2014, 03:26:46 PM
Fantastic!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 31, 2014, 03:31:29 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 31, 2014, 02:00:25 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Mar 31, 2014, 01:50:12 PM
I meant the interviewees for the show, lol. Do you have a specific way of contacting them?

Haha, silly me.

Through their managers, agents or just tweeting and asking them directly.

That's convenient. Do they charge for these?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 31, 2014, 03:37:28 PM
I hope they wouldn't.  Btw, can you give us a hint at who'll be your next guest?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 31, 2014, 03:47:29 PM
Nope they don't charge at all. They do it from the kindness of their prehistoric hearts.

It's an actor from one of the JP films. ::)

Btw I just got a text saying we've got even more stuff for the Comp!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 31, 2014, 03:49:50 PM
 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 01, 2014, 06:56:24 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dvd-covers.org%2Fd%2F271445-2%2FJurassic_Park_2_The_Lost_World_-_Custom_-_Bluray_002.jpg&hash=678f54f3ab030ba98d7e487c39e8701aba16ab4d)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reactiongifs.us%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F03%2Fpile_of_shit.gif&hash=270012793ed933347637129c867ead2d3a575845)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 01, 2014, 07:00:06 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Jul 29, 2012, 08:28:46 PM
I have a dream of keeping interesting and creative threads alive.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reactiongifs.us%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F03%2Fpile_of_shit.gif&hash=270012793ed933347637129c867ead2d3a575845)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 01, 2014, 07:01:28 PM
JUST A MAN AND HIS DREAMS
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Apr 01, 2014, 07:04:17 PM
Pffsh Lost World is tits. Totally awesome, and also includes many scenes from the first Jurassic Park novel.

GTFO ASPIE, Back to Godzilla with you! You geddouttahere YOU GEDDOUTTAHEAH.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 01, 2014, 07:06:10 PM
lol my Godzilla films and all of it's sequels will be classic.


You all have to mourn the two dookies after the original JP
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Apr 01, 2014, 07:07:28 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Apr 01, 2014, 07:06:10 PM
lol my Godzilla films and all of it's sequels will be classic.


You all have to mourn the two dookies after the original JP

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fyeartwo.cinema52.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F08%2FMalcolmLWYawn.png&hash=2b6b04835a947b7aa11e87d5b6b06ee10ca93401)

Yawn.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 01, 2014, 07:08:45 PM
--Vince Vaughan... nuff said (and he just randomly disappears)
--Requisite cliche effeminate English villain
--Random adopted black daughter stows away just cuz kid demographic needed
--Raptor death via GYMNASTICS :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
--Boat crashes into San Diego....just cuz whatever moving along giant plot hole who cares
--Triceratops throws a flaming car into the air that then flies across half the island and magically lands in Pete's tree

It's a pretty shit movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 01, 2014, 07:09:08 PM
Quote from: RagingDragon on Apr 01, 2014, 07:07:28 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Apr 01, 2014, 07:06:10 PM
lol my Godzilla films and all of it's sequels will be classic.


You all have to mourn the two dookies after the original JP

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fyeartwo.cinema52.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F08%2FMalcolmLWYawn.png&hash=2b6b04835a947b7aa11e87d5b6b06ee10ca93401)

Yawn.


lol better than the world's collective yawn following the end of The Lost World
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 01, 2014, 07:14:00 PM
JP 3 >TLW

No annoying message in sight.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 01, 2014, 07:15:38 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi58.tinypic.com%2F11h9mqt.gif&hash=bc17d3c86531f80a8f2501778b86de80a7ad53aa)(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi58.tinypic.com%2F11h9mqt.gif&hash=bc17d3c86531f80a8f2501778b86de80a7ad53aa)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi58.tinypic.com%2F11h9mqt.gif&hash=bc17d3c86531f80a8f2501778b86de80a7ad53aa)(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi58.tinypic.com%2F11h9mqt.gif&hash=bc17d3c86531f80a8f2501778b86de80a7ad53aa)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi58.tinypic.com%2F11h9mqt.gif&hash=bc17d3c86531f80a8f2501778b86de80a7ad53aa)(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi58.tinypic.com%2F11h9mqt.gif&hash=bc17d3c86531f80a8f2501778b86de80a7ad53aa)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi58.tinypic.com%2F11h9mqt.gif&hash=bc17d3c86531f80a8f2501778b86de80a7ad53aa)(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi58.tinypic.com%2F11h9mqt.gif&hash=bc17d3c86531f80a8f2501778b86de80a7ad53aa)
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Apr 01, 2014, 07:15:48 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 01, 2014, 07:08:45 PM
--Vince Vaughan... nuff said (and he just randomly disappears)
--Requisite cliche effeminate English villain
--Random adopted black daughter stows away just cuz kid demographic needed
--Raptor death via GYMNASTICS :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
--Boat crashes into San Diego....just cuz whatever moving along giant plot hole who cares
--Triceratops throws a flaming car into the air that then flies across half the island and magically lands in Pete's tree

It's a pretty shit movie.

The only one that even holds any water is the gymnastic raptor death. I think that car went flying due to a giant explosion, kind of like how Grant and Lex are suddenly rappelling down a hundred foot cliff the Tyrannosaur apparently just walked over?

It wasn't as tight a story as JP, but it was a hell of a good time and expanded the story in a believable way. Also featured plenty of good things from the JP and Lost World novels kind of mish-mashed.

And it was better than JP3, which had a lot of things going for it in spite of even more dumb shit.

Nowhere near as bad as many other sequels.

And how dare you Vince Vaughan. He's my favorite.

KiramidHead what?! ALAN.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 01, 2014, 07:17:54 PM
welcome to the island, RD
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 01, 2014, 07:18:37 PM
Quote from: RagingDragon on Apr 01, 2014, 07:15:48 PM
I think that car went flying due to a giant explosion
...which didn't kill anyone, least of all the heroes at the campground, where the explosion would have happened? How the f**k is an EXPLOSION going to launch an entire jeep a mile into the air? Were they testing an A-bomb? :laugh:

Quote from: RagingDragon on Apr 01, 2014, 07:15:48 PM
And it was better than JP3, which had a lot of things going for it in spite of even more dumb shit.
Everything is better than JP3.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 01, 2014, 07:24:34 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Apr 01, 2014, 07:06:10 PM
lol my Godzilla films and all of it's sequels will be classic.


You all have to mourn the two dookies after the original JP

So says the Godzookie fan...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 01, 2014, 07:26:10 PM
..... i'll give the trilogy a rewatch one of these days... :P Time for a marathon... :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 01, 2014, 07:27:59 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 01, 2014, 07:24:34 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Apr 01, 2014, 07:06:10 PM
lol my Godzilla films and all of it's sequels will be classic.


You all have to mourn the two dookies after the original JP

So says the Godzookie fan...

lol don't hate because my franchise shows promise, as opposed to JURASSIC WORLD or what ever that new movie is called.


Assuming, of course, it's. not in development Hell.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Apr 01, 2014, 07:28:33 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 01, 2014, 07:18:37 PM
...which didn't kill anyone, least of all the heroes at the campground, where the explosion would have happened? How the f**k is an EXPLOSION going to launch an entire jeep a mile into the air? Were they testing an A-bomb? :laugh:

Nit-picking I say. No greater logical leap than sudden T-Rex paddock cliff.

And that cast.. Pete Postlethwaite, Peter Stormare, Julianne Moore, The Goldblum, VINCE VAUGHAN!

The stegos, the compy's, the raptors, the capture scene, the waterfall, dat Robert Bakker lol. I even had fun with the T-Rex stomping around San Diego. ;D

I am a blind loyalist, to the death I tell you! It may be half-retarded, but goddamnit if it is, then so am I!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 01, 2014, 07:36:03 PM
DINOSAURS RAAWWRRR!!!!!!!1111111!111111111
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fecx.images-amazon.com%2Fimages%2FI%2F81qxcQFpYlL._SY355_.jpg&hash=31460c1161dab0dd446d74e1d66f05779c3680ba)
;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 01, 2014, 07:37:29 PM
Quote from: RagingDragon on Apr 01, 2014, 07:28:33 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 01, 2014, 07:18:37 PM
...which didn't kill anyone, least of all the heroes at the campground, where the explosion would have happened? How the f**k is an EXPLOSION going to launch an entire jeep a mile into the air? Were they testing an A-bomb? :laugh:

Nit-picking I say. No greater logical leap than sudden T-Rex paddock cliff.

http://www.jplegacy.org/?ffjpking (http://www.jplegacy.org/?ffjpking)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 01, 2014, 07:37:56 PM
f**k Yeah The Lost World.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 01, 2014, 07:38:22 PM
And for the record Rage, JP1 is filled with just as many dumbass idiotic moments, but it's actually entertaining and well-made ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 01, 2014, 07:41:37 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Apr 01, 2014, 07:37:56 PM
f**k Yeah The Lost World.

I don't know how many times I watched it when I used to own it on VHS. I'm pretty sure I ruined the tape, lol.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 01, 2014, 07:43:58 PM
I watched it to complete oblivion (of the tape). SO much rewinding.

Also, screw the THX logo at the beginning. Shit was terrifying.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Apr 01, 2014, 07:44:55 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 01, 2014, 07:36:03 PM
DINOSAURS RAAWWRRR!!!!!!!1111111!111111111
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fecx.images-amazon.com%2Fimages%2FI%2F81qxcQFpYlL._SY355_.jpg&hash=31460c1161dab0dd446d74e1d66f05779c3680ba)
;D
You have conjured my 13 year old self. :laugh:

Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 01, 2014, 07:37:29 PM
http://www.jplegacy.org/?ffjpking (http://www.jplegacy.org/?ffjpking)
Now there's a healthy dose of nerd analysis I can respect! I'll buy it, lol.

Me too Doom, I had the double-tape special edition VHS with the holo T-Rex. Swapped between it and Return of the Jedi so many times, poor VCR couldn't handle it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Apr 01, 2014, 09:01:34 PM
I had the cover with the Raptors.

Still probably have the cassettes themselves...somewhere.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 01, 2014, 09:07:46 PM
I still have all three on VHS.

Spoiler
Only on VHS :(
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 01, 2014, 09:13:25 PM
I mainly wish Lost World had made more of its message about conservation vs exploitation. It ultimately amounted to a series of cool set pieces, in my opinion; everything else felt rushed and underdeveloped to make room for them.

I'm ambivalent about the massive departure the film made from the book, but I do wonder how differently the film would have turned out if Michael Crichton had returned as co-script writer. The double-act worked incredibly well for the first one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Apr 01, 2014, 09:27:05 PM
^ I'm sure it would've been a lot less derpy. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 01, 2014, 09:30:30 PM
Here's how you improve TLW: replace the clunky animal rights message with something less annoying, and axe the pointless San Diego crap, which added basically nothing and made the movie far too long. Add in the camo Carnotauruses from the novel, and make Roland Tembo the main character.  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 01, 2014, 09:37:54 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Apr 01, 2014, 09:30:30 PM
axe the pointless San Diego crap, which added basically nothing
Oh, it only proved the point Malcolm & co. tried to make for the whole film. "Taking Dinosaurs off this island is the worst idea in the long, sad history of bad ideas -- and I'm gonna be there when you learn that."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 01, 2014, 09:45:35 PM
*Shrugs* I've always liked the Rexzilla sequence, it's fun.

Without it, you have a total retread of the first film, ending with the main characters helicoptered off after escaping the raptors.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 01, 2014, 10:29:14 PM
And instead we get a silly King Kong/Lost World '25 homage that goes on way too long and is disconnected from the rest of the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 01, 2014, 10:59:17 PM
There were only two references to Kong, the ship's name and the Rex very, very briefly scratching his ear, before making a dribbling motion as he walks past the basketball net.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 01, 2014, 11:55:49 PM
Disconnected from the rest of the film? The sole source of human antagonism in the film is from InGen goons plundering the island for prizes to take home with them. Until that point, the only indication we'd seen of this being a bad thing was a Parasaurolophus being tripped over. San Diego's trashing has more to do with the point of the film than most of the other setpieces.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 01, 2014, 11:58:49 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Apr 01, 2014, 07:43:58 PM
Also, screw the THX logo at the beginning. Shit was terrifying.

Yyyeeeeeeeeeeeeessssssssssssssssss

Quote from: Aspie on Apr 01, 2014, 06:56:24 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dvd-covers.org%2Fd%2F271445-2%2FJurassic_Park_2_The_Lost_World_-_Custom_-_Bluray_002.jpg&hash=678f54f3ab030ba98d7e487c39e8701aba16ab4d)

Did anyone read the terribly written synopsis for the wrong movie up there?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 02, 2014, 04:56:15 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 01, 2014, 11:58:49 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Apr 01, 2014, 07:43:58 PM
Also, screw the THX logo at the beginning. Shit was terrifying.

Yyyeeeeeeeeeeeeessssssssssssssssss

Quote from: Aspie on Apr 01, 2014, 06:56:24 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dvd-covers.org%2Fd%2F271445-2%2FJurassic_Park_2_The_Lost_World_-_Custom_-_Bluray_002.jpg&hash=678f54f3ab030ba98d7e487c39e8701aba16ab4d)

Did anyone read the terribly written synopsis for the wrong movie up there?

Wtf they didn't ship that did they?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 02, 2014, 11:38:56 AM
Competition updated with more booty!

http://www.jpforever.com/ (http://www.jpforever.com/)

Any of you guys going to enter? :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 02, 2014, 08:36:47 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 01, 2014, 11:58:49 PM
Did anyone read the terribly written synopsis for the wrong movie up there?

It's actually f**king hilarious. :D

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Apr 02, 2014, 10:09:42 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Apr 02, 2014, 04:56:15 AM
Wtf they didn't ship that did they?

It's probably pirated from somewhere. I've read ones while in Iraq that were far, far funnier. Like Engrish gone bad on steroids, just complete psychotic babble. :laugh: Kimarhi may know what I'm talking about, or anyone whose seen foreign pirated movies.

I wish I had kept some.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 02, 2014, 10:12:34 PM
@ Alien³  Awesome!



I think I know why it's going to be called Jurassic World now, if this new rumor (and my previous assumptions) prove true....

http://moviepilot.com/posts/2014/03/31/t-rex-set-to-rampage-through-san-diego-in-jurassic-world-1306299?lt_source=external,manual (http://moviepilot.com/posts/2014/03/31/t-rex-set-to-rampage-through-san-diego-in-jurassic-world-1306299?lt_source=external,manual)

Think about it.

ALSO, GEARING UP TIME!!!!!!!!!

http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=125 (http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=125)

http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=126 (http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=126)

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/t1.0-9/10171698_719914384719742_998310733_n.jpg)

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/t1.0-9/1601260_719311824779998_1240964901_n.jpg)

UPDATE!

New concept art:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.bloody-disgusting.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F04%2Fjurassic-world-1.jpg&hash=ecda85349a1ae10eab7abc62026fc46eadd7bc18)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.bloody-disgusting.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F04%2Fjurassic-world-2.jpg&hash=b198190948d650c9906fe3299cfcb3a589e4a0d1)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 02, 2014, 10:30:41 PM
I'm always up for some Bryce Dallas Howard.  :-*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 02, 2014, 11:10:16 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 02, 2014, 10:12:34 PM
http://moviepilot.com/posts/2014/03/31/t-rex-set-to-rampage-through-san-diego-in-jurassic-world-1306299?lt_source=external,manual (http://moviepilot.com/posts/2014/03/31/t-rex-set-to-rampage-through-san-diego-in-jurassic-world-1306299?lt_source=external,manual)

Brace yourself. Aspie is coming.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Apr 02, 2014, 11:18:27 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 02, 2014, 11:10:16 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 02, 2014, 10:12:34 PM
http://moviepilot.com/posts/2014/03/31/t-rex-set-to-rampage-through-san-diego-in-jurassic-world-1306299?lt_source=external,manual (http://moviepilot.com/posts/2014/03/31/t-rex-set-to-rampage-through-san-diego-in-jurassic-world-1306299?lt_source=external,manual)

Brace yourself. Aspie is coming.
:laugh:

Let him come. We will shave him.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Apr 02, 2014, 11:19:45 PM
I'm down for that. :P

It was ridiculously awesome before, it can be ridiculously awesome again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Apr 02, 2014, 11:50:31 PM
maybe at the end all of the dinosaurs somehow make it to the mainland and they once again rule the earth.

lol.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 03, 2014, 02:26:43 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 02, 2014, 10:12:34 PM
@ Alien³  Awesome!



I think I know why it's going to be called Jurassic World now, if this new rumor (and my previous assumptions) prove true....

http://moviepilot.com/posts/2014/03/31/t-rex-set-to-rampage-through-san-diego-in-jurassic-world-1306299?lt_source=external,manual (http://moviepilot.com/posts/2014/03/31/t-rex-set-to-rampage-through-san-diego-in-jurassic-world-1306299?lt_source=external,manual)

Think about it.

ALSO, GEARING UP TIME!!!!!!!!!

http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=125 (http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=125)

http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=126 (http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=126)

https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/t1.0-9/10171698_719914384719742_998310733_n.jpg

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/t1.0-9/1601260_719311824779998_1240964901_n.jpg)

UPDATE!

New concept art:

http://cdn.bloody-disgusting.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/jurassic-world-1.jpg

http://cdn.bloody-disgusting.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/jurassic-world-2.jpg

I'm boarding the hype train guys.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 03, 2014, 03:25:22 AM
Ty Simpkins is in this? Cool, he's probably one of my favorite child actors right now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 03, 2014, 03:28:25 AM
I wonder if he'll be a pussy about it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 03, 2014, 04:57:07 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Apr 03, 2014, 03:28:25 AM
I wonder if he'll be a pussy about it.


(https://fbcdn-photos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/t1.0-0/10170739_634109913328276_1150861498_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 03, 2014, 01:29:41 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5UemOigQcLQ#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5UemOigQcLQ#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 03, 2014, 04:31:35 PM
New JP vehicles headed for Hawaii!

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/t1.0-9/1609949_10152141576865528_2111986775_n.jpg)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blogcdn.com%2Fwww.autoblog.com%2Fmedia%2F2013%2F03%2Famg-g63-6x6-1-628.jpg&hash=afb248edf87d5523eeec190f3dffbaef9149a28d)

http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=127 (http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=127)

f**k yes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 03, 2014, 05:31:14 PM
Spare no expense!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 03, 2014, 05:39:01 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Apr 03, 2014, 05:31:14 PM
Spare no expense!
Only spare it when the fat guy wants a kickback.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 03, 2014, 06:12:32 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 03, 2014, 04:31:35 PM
New JP vehicles headed for Hawaii!

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/t1.0-9/1609949_10152141576865528_2111986775_n.jpg)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blogcdn.com%2Fwww.autoblog.com%2Fmedia%2F2013%2F03%2Famg-g63-6x6-1-628.jpg&hash=afb248edf87d5523eeec190f3dffbaef9149a28d)

http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=127 (http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=127)

f**k yes.

No more Jeeps?? awww :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Apr 03, 2014, 06:15:42 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 03, 2014, 04:31:35 PM
New JP vehicles headed for Hawaii!

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/t1.0-9/1609949_10152141576865528_2111986775_n.jpg)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blogcdn.com%2Fwww.autoblog.com%2Fmedia%2F2013%2F03%2Famg-g63-6x6-1-628.jpg&hash=afb248edf87d5523eeec190f3dffbaef9149a28d)

http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=127 (http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=127)

f**k yes.

Wow those are actually some really cool looking vehicles.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Apr 03, 2014, 06:26:59 PM
So nice looking, it's a shame they're gonna end up thrashed all over the place. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Apr 03, 2014, 06:53:31 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 03, 2014, 04:31:35 PM
New JP vehicles headed for Hawaii!

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/t1.0-9/1609949_10152141576865528_2111986775_n.jpg)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blogcdn.com%2Fwww.autoblog.com%2Fmedia%2F2013%2F03%2Famg-g63-6x6-1-628.jpg&hash=afb248edf87d5523eeec190f3dffbaef9149a28d)

http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=127 (http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=127)

f**k yes.
This made me hook up the VCR and get out the 2-tape Lost World Collector's Edition. Watching now lol. The 6 wheels are cool but they don't look very practical, unless they've got some mean all-terrain ability.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Apr 03, 2014, 08:13:42 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r79DTyHGLfM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r79DTyHGLfM#ws)

They are very good off road vehicles. Can't wait to see what they look like in action.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Apr 03, 2014, 09:03:33 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Apr 03, 2014, 08:13:42 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r79DTyHGLfM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r79DTyHGLfM#ws)

They are very good off road vehicles. Can't wait to see what they look like in action.
ONE OF THOSE THINGS COSTS $600,000+ Holy fml. Better start saving now. :laugh:

I bet that suspension is more complicated, too. Probably have to pay another few hundred k to fix it, not to mention those compressors and the tire system. Just awesome.

...that Dark Knight soundtrack in the episode lol.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 03, 2014, 09:05:06 PM
^Lamborghini Aventador police cars...

WTF.  :laugh: :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 03, 2014, 11:52:13 PM

Judy Greer Joins Bryce Dallas Howard, Chris Pratt in 'Jurassic World'

http://www.thewrap.com/judy-greer-joins-bryce-dallas-howard-chris-pratt-jurassic-world/ (http://www.thewrap.com/judy-greer-joins-bryce-dallas-howard-chris-pratt-jurassic-world/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Apr 04, 2014, 02:17:54 AM
she must die
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Apr 04, 2014, 02:28:12 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Apr 03, 2014, 11:52:13 PM

Judy Greer Joins Bryce Dallas Howard, Chris Pratt in 'Jurassic World'

http://www.thewrap.com/judy-greer-joins-bryce-dallas-howard-chris-pratt-jurassic-world/ (http://www.thewrap.com/judy-greer-joins-bryce-dallas-howard-chris-pratt-jurassic-world/)
For a second there I thought they put the word actress in quotations, which would have been hilariously mean, but it turns out it's just a possessive apostrophe.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Apr 04, 2014, 03:42:59 AM
Quote from: RagingDragon on Apr 03, 2014, 09:03:33 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Apr 03, 2014, 08:13:42 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r79DTyHGLfM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r79DTyHGLfM#ws)

They are very good off road vehicles. Can't wait to see what they look like in action.
ONE OF THOSE THINGS COSTS $600,000+ Holy fml. Better start saving now. :laugh:

I bet that suspension is more complicated, too. Probably have to pay another few hundred k to fix it, not to mention those compressors and the tire system. Just awesome.

...that Dark Knight soundtrack in the episode lol.

I love when they use movie soundtracks! There are a couple episodes where they use the JP theme to great effect.

And it's good to see Judy Greer in Jurassic World. I've only really seen her in comedic roles like Archer and Arrested Development. so I'm curious what role she'll play.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Apr 04, 2014, 03:45:21 AM
Quote from: Remonster on Apr 03, 2014, 08:13:42 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r79DTyHGLfM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r79DTyHGLfM#ws)

They are very good off road vehicles. Can't wait to see what they look like in action.

My God it's massive.

Perfect vehicle for a Dinosaur-filled environment.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 04, 2014, 04:54:23 AM
Quote from: Remonster on Apr 04, 2014, 03:42:59 AM
Quote from: RagingDragon on Apr 03, 2014, 09:03:33 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Apr 03, 2014, 08:13:42 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r79DTyHGLfM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r79DTyHGLfM#ws)

They are very good off road vehicles. Can't wait to see what they look like in action.
ONE OF THOSE THINGS COSTS $600,000+ Holy fml. Better start saving now. :laugh:

I bet that suspension is more complicated, too. Probably have to pay another few hundred k to fix it, not to mention those compressors and the tire system. Just awesome.

...that Dark Knight soundtrack in the episode lol.

I love when they use movie soundtracks! There are a couple episodes where they use the JP theme to great effect.

And it's good to see Judy Greer in Jurassic World. I've only really seen her in comedic roles like Archer and Arrested Development. so I'm curious what role she'll play.

I agree I like Judy Greer. I think she can be quite cute. I remember she had starred in a failed sitcom a couple years back that had Jason Biggs in it. She was good in that too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 04, 2014, 08:11:25 AM
All fantastic news. ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 04, 2014, 11:38:34 AM
You don't sound convinced.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Apr 04, 2014, 11:41:03 AM
I don't get the hate for Judy Greer. I haven't seen her in much, but she was pretty decent in Carrie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 04, 2014, 11:44:49 AM
I found her irritating in Arrested Development but then again, I'm probably projecting her character onto her as a person.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 04, 2014, 01:52:13 PM
A comic book artist called TRexJones drew this amazing picture based on a scene from the JP novel...

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BkTMZSVCAAEu8L4.jpg)

Then I added some colour using the action figures as a guide.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BkYb06XCUAA3u8M.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 04, 2014, 02:02:23 PM
That's really cool. Muldoon was such a beast in the novel. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 04, 2014, 02:06:02 PM
Epic stuff. That was such an intense moment in the book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 04, 2014, 02:30:48 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Apr 04, 2014, 02:02:23 PM
That's really cool. Muldoon was such a beast in the novel. 8)

And he did most of that while drunk. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 04, 2014, 02:36:10 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Apr 04, 2014, 02:02:23 PM
Muldoon was such a beast in the novel. 8)

...and in the film!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 04, 2014, 02:41:25 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 04, 2014, 01:52:13 PM
A comic book artist called TRexJones drew this amazing picture based on a scene from the JP novel...

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BkTMZSVCAAEu8L4.jpg)

Then I added some colour using the action figures as a guide.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BkYb06XCUAA3u8M.jpg)

This is amazing! I can't describe how much I love this  :o Muldoon was such a bamf in the book.  Even stuck in a pipe he's such a baws  8) lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 04, 2014, 02:42:14 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Apr 04, 2014, 02:02:23 PM
That's really cool. Muldoon was such a beast in the novel. 8)

"Like living dangerously?"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 04, 2014, 02:47:50 PM
Too bad we'll never get a Muldoon/Tembo team up movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 04, 2014, 02:50:38 PM
May both those terrific actors Rest In Peace.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Apr 04, 2014, 06:24:40 PM
Aw f**king awesome awesome awesome. ^^^ Great picture! Makes me want to draw, and I may copy the idea of illustrating a scene from the book.

Hell yes to all. Just finished reading Jurassic Park again, and all hail Mul-f**king-Doon!

Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 04, 2014, 02:36:10 PM
...and in the film!

And I'm sorry but no bro. Muldoon got shit on so hard in the film, and his character was made out to look like a total moron. In the book, he lives through unimaginable events, including the raptors, and while drunk.

It's one of the most shocking misrepresentations of a character I've seen in a film, come to think lol.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 04, 2014, 06:28:55 PM
I love both for different reasons.

I don't think the novel version would have worked in Spielberg's version.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Apr 04, 2014, 06:36:55 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 04, 2014, 11:44:49 AM
I found her irritating in Arrested Development but then again, I'm probably projecting her character onto her as a person.
Arrested Development = best show ever not named Breaking Bad!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Apr 04, 2014, 06:41:56 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 04, 2014, 06:28:55 PM
I love both for different reasons.

I don't think the novel version would have worked in Spielberg's version.

No once you get past the beginning and Rex sequence, they diverge like crazy. Would be hard to imagine, so many differences.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 04, 2014, 07:57:20 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 04, 2014, 01:52:13 PM
A comic book artist called TRexJones drew this amazing picture based on a scene from the JP novel...

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BkTMZSVCAAEu8L4.jpg)

Then I added some colour using the action figures as a guide.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BkYb06XCUAA3u8M.jpg)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_mdc65v0gPk1ruhd6j.gif&hash=77c3706ac19bd631c48a9cf6936cd331f9e90b5a)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: viendammage on Apr 04, 2014, 09:14:26 PM
If anybody lives in the Los Angeles area, the Aero theatre is doing a Jurassic Park triple feature in Santa Monica, I wouldn't mind going but I'll be at the Calgary Expo!

http://www.americancinemathequecalendar.com/content/jurassic-park-the-lost-world-jurassic-park-jurassic-park-iii-0 (http://www.americancinemathequecalendar.com/content/jurassic-park-the-lost-world-jurassic-park-jurassic-park-iii-0)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 05, 2014, 01:01:45 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 04, 2014, 01:52:13 PM
A comic book artist called TRexJones drew this amazing picture based on a scene from the JP novel...

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BkTMZSVCAAEu8L4.jpg)

Then I added some colour using the action figures as a guide.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BkYb06XCUAA3u8M.jpg)

Nice. Jones was supposed to draw a Silent Hill comic, but it fell through.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 07, 2014, 02:50:36 AM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Apr 04, 2014, 06:36:55 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 04, 2014, 11:44:49 AM
I found her irritating in Arrested Development but then again, I'm probably projecting her character onto her as a person.
Arrested Development = best show ever not named Breaking Bad!

I have to give that nod to Sons of Anarchy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Apr 07, 2014, 04:56:43 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 07, 2014, 02:50:36 AM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Apr 04, 2014, 06:36:55 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 04, 2014, 11:44:49 AM
I found her irritating in Arrested Development but then again, I'm probably projecting her character onto her as a person.
Arrested Development = best show ever not named Breaking Bad!

I have to give that nod to Sons of Anarchy.
On second thought:

Arrested Development = best show ever not named Breaking Bad, Urusei Yatsura, Married... with Children, Kimagure Orange Road or the first 8 seasons of The Simpsons.  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 07, 2014, 06:03:06 AM
Hannibal. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomorphine on Apr 07, 2014, 06:47:02 PM
Or 'Rome', 'Farscape', 'South Park', 'Band Of Brothers', 'Buffy The Vampire Slayer' or...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 07, 2014, 07:09:20 PM
...Battlestar Galactica, Doctor Who, Stargate SG-1...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 07, 2014, 11:06:15 PM
...The Wire, The Sopranos, The Borgias, The IT Crowd...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Apr 08, 2014, 09:54:22 AM
Mad Men, Deadwood, Firefly
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 08, 2014, 11:16:06 AM
Is anyone else but me curious about what the Jurassic Park TV series would've been like?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Apr 08, 2014, 03:52:53 PM
Jurassic World begins production this Thursday.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 08, 2014, 04:45:24 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Apr 08, 2014, 03:52:53 PM
Jurassic World begins production this Thursday.

YES IT DOES!!!!!!!!!!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jurassicworld.org%2Fnews%2Fuploads%2FTyandColin-Hawaii.jpg&hash=0c7002ead3e948bcacc78a0a800677b81702c669)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 08, 2014, 06:06:28 PM
Yes. It. Has. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomorphine on Apr 08, 2014, 07:34:00 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 08, 2014, 11:16:06 AM
Is anyone else but me curious about what the Jurassic Park TV series would've been like?

Wait, what...?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 09, 2014, 03:05:22 AM
Quote from: Xenomorphine on Apr 08, 2014, 07:34:00 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 08, 2014, 11:16:06 AM
Is anyone else but me curious about what the Jurassic Park TV series would've been like?

Wait, what...?

Kinda glad that didn't happen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 09, 2014, 11:21:24 AM
Quote from: Xenomorphine on Apr 08, 2014, 07:34:00 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 08, 2014, 11:16:06 AM
Is anyone else but me curious about what the Jurassic Park TV series would've been like?

Wait, what...?

Yeah, seriously. I remember reading that it was supposed to be based on what eventually became the Chaos Effect toy line in 1998. I'll do some more digging.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: T Dog on Apr 09, 2014, 11:33:18 AM
Yo did anyone ever play this awesome game?
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2F-FggOnzJlZI%2Fhqdefault.jpg&hash=2ce3c5fddb38c6ef2fed8ee3daef10afeb27160a)

I never was particularly good at it but I remember it had opening cutscenes with SPEECH and the game itself was dripping with atmosphere.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 09, 2014, 11:38:17 AM
Yup, I did and loved it! It's definitely a more Turok-y version of JP.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Apr 09, 2014, 05:59:00 PM
First Co-op game I ever played. My brother and I sunk hours into this game, despite how hard it was. Awesome soundtrack to boot.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Apr 09, 2014, 06:37:44 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 09, 2014, 11:21:24 AM
Quote from: Xenomorphine on Apr 08, 2014, 07:34:00 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 08, 2014, 11:16:06 AM
Is anyone else but me curious about what the Jurassic Park TV series would've been like?

Wait, what...?

Yeah, seriously. I remember reading that it was supposed to be based on what eventually became the Chaos Effect toy line in 1998. I'll do some more digging.

That chaos effect toyline was really weird. I loved it.

Only ever had one of the toys as a kid though. The stegosaurus-compy thing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 09, 2014, 08:40:15 PM
http://www.jptoys.com/toy-database/chaos-effect/dinosaurs/compstegnathus/index.htm (http://www.jptoys.com/toy-database/chaos-effect/dinosaurs/compstegnathus/index.htm)

;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 09, 2014, 09:35:41 PM
Fan render....

(https://fbcdn-photos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/t1.0-0/c0.0.960.636/s600x600/1509723_620167498062925_4356111520941051239_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Apr 09, 2014, 10:08:18 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 09, 2014, 08:40:15 PM
http://www.jptoys.com/toy-database/chaos-effect/dinosaurs/compstegnathus/index.htm (http://www.jptoys.com/toy-database/chaos-effect/dinosaurs/compstegnathus/index.htm)

;)
I watched the commercial and I do remember it! The T-rex looks like it just came from a Grateful Dead concert :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 09, 2014, 10:10:22 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 09, 2014, 09:35:41 PM
Fan render....

https://fbcdn-photos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/t1.0-0/c0.0.960.636/s600x600/1509723_620167498062925_4356111520941051239_n.jpg

Sexy  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 10, 2014, 01:48:42 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 09, 2014, 09:35:41 PM
Fan render....

https://fbcdn-photos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/t1.0-0/c0.0.960.636/s600x600/1509723_620167498062925_4356111520941051239_n.jpg

This looks infinitely more practical than the vehicles seen in the first film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Apr 10, 2014, 03:11:01 AM
Hey Doom, you need this for your trophy collection:
Spoiler
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Jurassic-Park-VELOCIRAPTOR-Prop-Replica-Limited-Wallbursting-Head-Claw-Set-/331144597538?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item4d19c19022&nma=true&si=9vSJRm%252F9h8nf%252BVlorcSCxuvuINE%253D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557]
[url]http://www.ebay.com/itm/Jurassic-Park-VELOCIRAPTOR-Prop-Replica-Limited-Wallbursting-Head-Claw-Set-/331144597538?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item4d19c19022&nma=true&si=9vSJRm%252F9h8nf%252BVlorcSCxuvuINE%253D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557 (http://[url)[/url]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Apr 10, 2014, 03:25:42 AM
That vehicle is actually something I'd like for a personal vehicle.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 10, 2014, 07:26:08 AM
It's an important day for JP fans everywhere.

Day 1 of the Jurassic World shoot! ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 10, 2014, 11:30:50 AM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Apr 10, 2014, 03:11:01 AM
Hey Doom, you need this for your trophy collection:
Spoiler

[url]http://www.ebay.com/itm/Jurassic-Park-VELOCIRAPTOR-Prop-Replica-Limited-Wallbursting-Head-Claw-Set-/331144597538?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item4d19c19022&nma=true&si=9vSJRm%252F9h8nf%252BVlorcSCxuvuINE%253D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557]http://www.ebay.com/itm/Jurassic-Park-VELOCIRAPTOR-Prop-Replica-Limited-Wallbursting-Head-Claw-Set-/331144597538?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item4d19c19022&nma=true&si=9vSJRm%252F9h8nf%252BVlorcSCxuvuINE%253D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557]
[url]http://www.ebay.com/itm/Jurassic-Park-VELOCIRAPTOR-Prop-Replica-Limited-Wallbursting-Head-Claw-Set-/331144597538?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item4d19c19022&nma=true&si=9vSJRm%252F9h8nf%252BVlorcSCxuvuINE%253D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557 (http://[url=http://www.ebay.com/itm/Jurassic-Park-VELOCIRAPTOR-Prop-Replica-Limited-Wallbursting-Head-Claw-Set-/331144597538?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item4d19c19022&nma=true&si=9vSJRm%252F9h8nf%252BVlorcSCxuvuINE%253D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557)[/url]
[close]

Ha, that's awesome. Not sure I'd have a place for it though.

Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 10, 2014, 07:26:08 AM
It's an important day for JP fans everywhere.

Day 1 of the Jurassic World shoot! ;D

I never thought the day would come :')
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 10, 2014, 01:17:57 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 10, 2014, 07:26:08 AM
It's an important day for JP fans everywhere.

Day 1 of the Jurassic World shoot! ;D

It's happening ;-;

I still remember back when I was a wee lad in 2005 just hounding for any indication that the series would move forward. I was part of the Welcome to JP forums, and it was such a great community back then. Ah, the nostalgia.

Can't believe it's finally filming. I still had an irrational fear that it would all crumble. Can't wait for the first teaser!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 10, 2014, 02:37:17 PM
OH MY MUTHERf**kIN GODDDDDDDDD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jurassicworld.org%2Fnews%2Fuploads%2FJW-Vehicle-Hawaii1.jpg&hash=aadac514886e526573ff7b55d9011bc91a88ab3a)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jurassicworld.org%2Fnews%2Fuploads%2FJW-Vehicle-Hawaii2.jpg&hash=f2ae5b0c31135516b37378a5c6d8bb85a4403023)
[close]

http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=132 (http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=132)

YYYYYEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 10, 2014, 02:42:07 PM
Looks great. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 10, 2014, 02:44:37 PM
THAT'S NOT ENOUGH ENTHUSIASM, NIGHTMARE!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: judge death on Apr 10, 2014, 02:46:13 PM
OMG that car, brings me back so many memories :D Cant wait to see the new movie, why 2015, I want it now! :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 10, 2014, 02:51:20 PM
I'm glad to hear this, but are they honestly going to use a 1993 Wrangler?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 10, 2014, 02:52:38 PM
yeah, why so old
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 10, 2014, 02:54:49 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Apr 10, 2014, 02:52:38 PM
yeah, why so old

Sometimes the old way are best.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia-cache-ak0.pinimg.com%2F736x%2F89%2F4d%2Fc6%2F894dc609a7e4a701ca26a8cc2453a5c0.jpg&hash=f7eac5a66552d44a90366d55e5713aabe2898b0c)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 10, 2014, 02:55:57 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 10, 2014, 02:44:37 PM
THAT'S NOT ENOUGH ENTHUSIASM, NIGHTMARE!

Just trying to keep my expectation in check. ;) To be honest, I'm still not really sold on this movie. Definitely going to see it in the theater, but I'm holding off on a trailer before I get completely invested.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 10, 2014, 03:01:15 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 10, 2014, 02:51:20 PM
I'm glad to hear this, but are they honestly going to use a 1993 Wrangler?

My personal guess is that Chris Pratt and his gang may stumble upon the old Jeep abandoned in some unseen section of the original park (hopefully they'll use it to flee a hungry dino, if they can get it to start!)

Others on the net are anticipating a flash-back scene (which may not make sense, since the Jeep has obviously aged through time), or possibly part of Patel's salvage collection.  The number "29" on the Jeep was the same one that Hammond and Gennaro were transported in in the beginning of Jurassic Park, too.  Personally, I hope my idea is what turns out.  I would love to see parts of the abandoned original park in this film.  The new vehicle also looks awesome.  Pretty reminiscent of InGen's trucks used in TLW.

I'm so happy to see these, if you haven't noticed.

Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 10, 2014, 02:55:57 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 10, 2014, 02:44:37 PM
THAT'S NOT ENOUGH ENTHUSIASM, NIGHTMARE!

Just trying to keep my expectation in check. ;) To be honest, I'm still not really sold on this movie. Definitely going to see it in the theater, but I'm holding off on a trailer before I get completely invested.

Gotcha
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 10, 2014, 03:03:03 PM
what ever happened to that can of DNA
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Apr 10, 2014, 03:03:31 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 10, 2014, 02:55:57 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 10, 2014, 02:44:37 PM
THAT'S NOT ENOUGH ENTHUSIASM, NIGHTMARE!

Just trying to keep my expectation in check. ;) To be honest, I'm still not really sold on this movie. Definitely going to see it in the theater, but I'm holding off on a trailer before I get completely invested.

I'm not that enthusiastic myself about this. I'll see it but I'm not hyped or anything of that nature.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 10, 2014, 03:31:31 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 10, 2014, 02:37:17 PM
OH MY MUTHERf**kIN GODDDDDDDDD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jurassicworld.org%2Fnews%2Fuploads%2FJW-Vehicle-Hawaii1.jpg&hash=aadac514886e526573ff7b55d9011bc91a88ab3a)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jurassicworld.org%2Fnews%2Fuploads%2FJW-Vehicle-Hawaii2.jpg&hash=f2ae5b0c31135516b37378a5c6d8bb85a4403023)
[close]

http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=132 (http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=132)

YYYYYEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Now that baby would've gotten Nedry to the dock on time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 10, 2014, 04:09:58 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 10, 2014, 03:01:15 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 10, 2014, 02:51:20 PM
I'm glad to hear this, but are they honestly going to use a 1993 Wrangler?

My personal guess is that Chris Pratt and his gang may stumble upon the old Jeep abandoned in some unseen section of the original park (hopefully they'll use it to flee a hungry dino, if they can get it to start!)

Others on the net are anticipating a flash-back scene (which may not make sense, since the Jeep has obviously aged through time), or possibly part of Patel's salvage collection.  The number "29" on the Jeep was the same one that Hammond and Gennaro were transported in in the beginning of Jurassic Park, too.  Personally, I hope my idea is what turns out.  I would love to see parts of the abandoned original park in this film.  The new vehicle also looks awesome.  Pretty reminiscent of InGen's trucks used in TLW.

I'm so happy to see these, if you haven't noticed.

Flashback is impossible considering none of these characters were around during the original movie. How can they have a flashback if they weren't there?

Hm, I'm sensing perhaps, and this is likely a huuuuuuge stretch, some story with the lost cryocan. BioSyn, anyone?

Quote from: Aspie on Apr 10, 2014, 03:03:03 PM
what ever happened to that can of DNA

Buried beneath a mud pile. Remember Nedry knocked himself out when getting back into the Jeep and it slipped out of his jacket.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Apr 10, 2014, 04:11:30 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 10, 2014, 02:44:37 PM
THAT'S NOT ENOUGH ENTHUSIASM, NIGHTMARE!
yay
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The1PerfectOrganism on Apr 10, 2014, 04:15:04 PM
Quote from: Cal427eb on Apr 10, 2014, 04:11:30 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 10, 2014, 02:44:37 PM
THAT'S NOT ENOUGH ENTHUSIASM, NIGHTMARE!
yay

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg2.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20111128023041%2Fmlpfanart%2Fimages%2Ff%2Ffa%2FFluttershy_-_Yay.gif&hash=4c11327a4f5d157f8bd310322edd42ec0956ad4b)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Apr 10, 2014, 04:19:52 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 10, 2014, 04:09:58 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 10, 2014, 03:01:15 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 10, 2014, 02:51:20 PM
I'm glad to hear this, but are they honestly going to use a 1993 Wrangler?

My personal guess is that Chris Pratt and his gang may stumble upon the old Jeep abandoned in some unseen section of the original park (hopefully they'll use it to flee a hungry dino, if they can get it to start!)

Others on the net are anticipating a flash-back scene (which may not make sense, since the Jeep has obviously aged through time), or possibly part of Patel's salvage collection.  The number "29" on the Jeep was the same one that Hammond and Gennaro were transported in in the beginning of Jurassic Park, too.  Personally, I hope my idea is what turns out.  I would love to see parts of the abandoned original park in this film.  The new vehicle also looks awesome.  Pretty reminiscent of InGen's trucks used in TLW.

I'm so happy to see these, if you haven't noticed.

Flashback is impossible considering none of these characters were around during the original movie. How can they have a flashback if they weren't there?

Hm, I'm sensing perhaps, and this is likely a huuuuuuge stretch, some story with the lost cryocan. BioSyn, anyone?

Quote from: Aspie on Apr 10, 2014, 03:03:03 PM
what ever happened to that can of DNA

Buried beneath a mud pile. Remember Nedry knocked himself out when getting back into the Jeep and it slipped out of his jacket.
Alright, I am trying my best not to visit this thread so I don't know anything about the movie until I see it (yeah yeah, old fashioned in a new fashion world I know) but this new info just made me smile and realize that I should not be back in this thread until the movie is done. Bye bye ladies and gentlemen (and Aspie)! I will miss seeing Doom's new arrivals  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 10, 2014, 04:23:47 PM
Whatever. You'll be back sooner than you think.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 10, 2014, 05:23:51 PM
Early today I got genuine goosebumps seeing the old 29 again.

They'll find it abandoned I reckon. It probably won't start or even be used. Just a background piece.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 11, 2014, 05:06:32 AM
Frank Marshall ‏@LeDoctor 2h

JURASSIC WORLD lives! First shot: 8:20 am. All is good. @UniversalPics
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 11, 2014, 05:12:08 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Apr 11, 2014, 05:06:32 AM
Frank Marshall ‏@LeDoctor 2h

JURASSIC WORLD lives! First shot: 8:20 am. All is good. @UniversalPics

Oh, yes. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 11, 2014, 11:24:19 AM
Jurassic World first day of Filming Photos.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/news/?a=97910#hPBKzy4Te7Pw4k5O.99 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/news/?a=97910#hPBKzy4Te7Pw4k5O.99)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Effectz on Apr 11, 2014, 11:34:45 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 11, 2014, 11:24:19 AM
Jurassic World first day of Filming Photos.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/news/?a=97910#hPBKzy4Te7Pw4k5O.99 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/news/?a=97910#hPBKzy4Te7Pw4k5O.99)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.gamespot.com%2Fuploads%2Foriginal%2F391%2F3912151%2F2441702-0720251747-origi.gif&hash=e7830356186bac609c591206faebff6a490c1b39)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Apr 11, 2014, 12:33:29 PM
Cross-posting from the blu-ray thread, I got this in the mail and it looks classy as heck:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FSuhtfNV.jpg&hash=a3d1f55b83c8141fd1e3486f9603e89b49471ab0) (http://imgur.com/SuhtfNV)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fbmby2eR.jpg&hash=e692735636092f608ba752faa5609535f1dfc0b2) (http://imgur.com/bmby2eR)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 11, 2014, 02:08:02 PM
@Xenomorph  Nice!



Irrfan Khan and tour vehicles seen on set

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2602363/Bollywood-actor-Irrfan-Khan-pictured-set-Jurassic-World-filming-kicks-Hawaii-action-movie-sequel.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2602363/Bollywood-actor-Irrfan-Khan-pictured-set-Jurassic-World-filming-kicks-Hawaii-action-movie-sequel.html)


Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 11, 2014, 02:56:20 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 11, 2014, 12:33:29 PM
Cross-posting from the blu-ray thread, I got this in the mail and it looks classy as heck:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FSuhtfNV.jpg&hash=a3d1f55b83c8141fd1e3486f9603e89b49471ab0) (http://imgur.com/SuhtfNV)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fbmby2eR.jpg&hash=e692735636092f608ba752faa5609535f1dfc0b2) (http://imgur.com/bmby2eR)

Wait what!? I bought the Ultimate Trilogy as well but it was grey and bulky!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 11, 2014, 03:11:56 PM
That's the Steelbook.

The unbelievably gorgeous Steelbook. Damn.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 11, 2014, 03:26:17 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 11, 2014, 02:08:02 PM
Irrfan Khan and tour vehicles seen on set

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2602363/Bollywood-actor-Irrfan-Khan-pictured-set-Jurassic-World-filming-kicks-Hawaii-action-movie-sequel.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2602363/Bollywood-actor-Irrfan-Khan-pictured-set-Jurassic-World-filming-kicks-Hawaii-action-movie-sequel.html)

High-tech golf carts?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Apr 11, 2014, 05:16:56 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 11, 2014, 03:26:17 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 11, 2014, 02:08:02 PM
Irrfan Khan and tour vehicles seen on set

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2602363/Bollywood-actor-Irrfan-Khan-pictured-set-Jurassic-World-filming-kicks-Hawaii-action-movie-sequel.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2602363/Bollywood-actor-Irrfan-Khan-pictured-set-Jurassic-World-filming-kicks-Hawaii-action-movie-sequel.html)

High-tech golf carts?

Interesting.. VERY INTERESTING INDEED!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 11, 2014, 06:02:05 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 11, 2014, 02:08:02 PM
@Xenomorph  Nice!



Irrfan Khan and tour vehicles seen on set

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2602363/Bollywood-actor-Irrfan-Khan-pictured-set-Jurassic-World-filming-kicks-Hawaii-action-movie-sequel.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2602363/Bollywood-actor-Irrfan-Khan-pictured-set-Jurassic-World-filming-kicks-Hawaii-action-movie-sequel.html)

So that's what happened to Dr. Ratha after the bridge scene in Amazing Spider-Man.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 11, 2014, 07:22:01 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Apr 11, 2014, 03:11:56 PM
That's the Steelbook.

The unbelievably gorgeous Steelbook. Damn.

How did I not know of this ;-;
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Apr 11, 2014, 07:22:59 PM
The first movie have a similar steelbook. Very tasty. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Apr 12, 2014, 12:01:05 AM
The first movie also has a classy comic book inspired steelbook:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsteelbookreview.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F02%2FSteelBook-Review-Jurassic-Park-Reel-Heroes-Blu-ray-SteelBook-Pre-order-Art-Front-Cover-and-Spine.jpg&hash=ac22af3c6ea407e1124d4ea391e4ddc6a75e3c60)

It's cool and I'd get it to go along with my other Universal comic-themed steelbooks I've got (Doom, Death Race, Big Lebowski) but the black ultimate Trilogy version is so much classier.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 13, 2014, 06:20:14 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5CQONsbGvQ#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5CQONsbGvQ#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 13, 2014, 09:30:46 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 12, 2014, 12:01:05 AM
The first movie also has a classy comic book inspired steelbook:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsteelbookreview.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F02%2FSteelBook-Review-Jurassic-Park-Reel-Heroes-Blu-ray-SteelBook-Pre-order-Art-Front-Cover-and-Spine.jpg&hash=ac22af3c6ea407e1124d4ea391e4ddc6a75e3c60)

It's cool and I'd get it to go along with my other Universal comic-themed steelbooks I've got (Doom, Death Race, Big Lebowski) but the black ultimate Trilogy version is so much classier.

:o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 14, 2014, 11:08:37 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Apr 13, 2014, 06:20:14 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5CQONsbGvQ#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5CQONsbGvQ#ws)

What's this? Says video is private.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 14, 2014, 01:41:31 PM
Just a cam video of a tour passing one of the sets.



Btw, this is that vehicle spotted on the Jurassic World flatbed transport...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.offroadvehicle.ru%2FAZBUCAR%2FTextron%2Ftiger_all_terrain_vehicle_4x4_mdt_textron.jpg&hash=434ba35453e8f0f77f0a199fd9e615fa46825844)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.textronmarineandland.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fgallery%2FTIGER_DSC01732_lowres.JPG&hash=5b003c2a0635ce6d1ff8758df7052c3e5b234c98)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fm1.behance.net%2Frendition%2Fmodules%2F8213377%2Fdisp%2F789618972fbaf01c9688776b7fa5ecf6.jpg&hash=62fe76d0402a60faa778ebf9962d70e2c8efcd12)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mdt-armor.com%2Fwp-content%2Fgallery%2Ftiger%2Finterior-sm.jpg&hash=e8913fb38987c9ad57f61ce8543aff777e82e812)

Looks like it can handle some dinos to me.

I'd like to see them throw this one in there too....

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fm1.behance.net%2Frendition%2Fmodules%2F36801015%2Fdisp%2F6d53b4fa61a9980afcb81746aaa2f96b.jpg&hash=dede4c4012c9c1775bacfe904b513cfd5e71d4de)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 14, 2014, 06:31:29 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 14, 2014, 01:41:31 PM
Just a cam video of a tour passing one of the sets.



Btw, this is that vehicle spotted on the Jurassic World flatbed transport...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.offroadvehicle.ru%2FAZBUCAR%2FTextron%2Ftiger_all_terrain_vehicle_4x4_mdt_textron.jpg&hash=434ba35453e8f0f77f0a199fd9e615fa46825844)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.textronmarineandland.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fgallery%2FTIGER_DSC01732_lowres.JPG&hash=5b003c2a0635ce6d1ff8758df7052c3e5b234c98)
http://m1.behance.net/rendition/modules/8213377/disp/789618972fbaf01c9688776b7fa5ecf6.jpg
http://www.mdt-armor.com/wp-content/gallery/tiger/interior-sm.jpg

Looks like it can handle some dinos to me.

I'd like to see them throw this one in there too....

http://m1.behance.net/rendition/modules/36801015/disp/6d53b4fa61a9980afcb81746aaa2f96b.jpg

The inside looks great!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 14, 2014, 08:24:24 PM
Alright, obviously I'm on a Jurassic World vehicle frenzy.

Here's what I'd like to see as a tour vehicle.  I imagine them sent out in different levels in accordance to the environment they'll be entering in.  Those little buggies we saw earlier can't possibly be the only tour vehicle they'll use.

(https://scontent-a-iad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/t31.0-8/1559308_10201322977827897_1912283532362525542_o.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 14, 2014, 08:40:25 PM
Coming up on the new episode of Jurassic Cast!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-z9qY4w520XI%2FU0xBeDvR0_I%2FAAAAAAAAASI%2FXy9rJhcq__M%2Fs1600%2FBlNUDHkCMAAlXqQ.jpg&hash=79a3ecf907eed6b92b4460ae3cbaec3936a97173)

You'll be able to find links to everything here jpforever.com
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 14, 2014, 09:14:37 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 14, 2014, 01:41:31 PM
Just a cam video of a tour passing one of the sets.



Btw, this is that vehicle spotted on the Jurassic World flatbed transport...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.offroadvehicle.ru%2FAZBUCAR%2FTextron%2Ftiger_all_terrain_vehicle_4x4_mdt_textron.jpg&hash=434ba35453e8f0f77f0a199fd9e615fa46825844)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.textronmarineandland.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fgallery%2FTIGER_DSC01732_lowres.JPG&hash=5b003c2a0635ce6d1ff8758df7052c3e5b234c98)
http://m1.behance.net/rendition/modules/8213377/disp/789618972fbaf01c9688776b7fa5ecf6.jpg
http://www.mdt-armor.com/wp-content/gallery/tiger/interior-sm.jpg

Looks like it can handle some dinos to me.

I'd like to see them throw this one in there too....

http://m1.behance.net/rendition/modules/36801015/disp/6d53b4fa61a9980afcb81746aaa2f96b.jpg

Spared no expense, indeed. It looks the new park creators are taking security very seriously.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Apr 15, 2014, 09:56:10 AM
Have they said if the new park is set on Isla Nublar, or somewhere new?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 15, 2014, 10:05:24 AM
All arrows are pointing towards Nublar.

Spoiler
Except this one...
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jurassicparkjeep.com%2FeastsignHD.JPG&hash=5d49d8efa14221d5bc2321ffcc9f0f2d0b45d2d3)
[close]

Trevorrow tweeted this picture,

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.latinospost.com%2Fdata%2Fimages%2Ffull%2F19162%2Fisla-nublar.jpg&hash=8396cb561ac2fe8a2cd49b20ac6d39457af8eec1)

Plus the image of the old jeep that was posted days ago, and the fact they're filming in the exact locations from JP1.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Apr 15, 2014, 10:16:51 AM
Wait, what old jeep image? I must have missed it.

I'm really entertained that my JP4 plot prediction I posted months (years?) ago is apparently straight-up happening.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 15, 2014, 10:19:08 AM
This was posted two or three days ago...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jurassicworlduniverse.com%2Fwordpress%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F04%2FJW-Vehicle-Hawaii1.jpg&hash=f67a82c8c2944125d61379b95fcade8fd0b5f4d6)

It's being shipped to Hawaii for JW.

If you notice it's the same jeep Hammond and Gennero use when seeing the Brachiosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Apr 15, 2014, 10:25:13 AM
If we get to see the remnants of other old vehicles (Nedry's jeep, the Ford Explorers near the T-rex enclosure) I'll be tickled pink. Largely because I'd predicted those, too. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 15, 2014, 10:28:47 AM
Me too!

I have a prediction that the new park is set on another part of the island, and the main characters will eventually get lost discovering the old park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 15, 2014, 11:03:23 AM
I would love to see the old Visitors Centre and know what state it's in. I highly doubt they're just going to gloss over the fact that the old embryos are still in cold storage.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 15, 2014, 01:19:21 PM
They would have been cleared out by InGen after the incident, surely.

The only embryos left would be the decaying remains of whats in the Barbasol can Nedry dropped.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 15, 2014, 01:36:23 PM
We can't say for sure until it's defined in the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 15, 2014, 01:52:04 PM
Of course ;)

My god I'm excited for 4!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 15, 2014, 02:17:33 PM
I'll be even more excited when we hear something about the dinosaurs. I'm guessing we won't see any of the Sorna dinos (Spino, Anky, etc...) because they were never on Nublar initially. Unless, this new company, whatever it's called, is expanding the exhibitions and the dinosaurs that were on Nublar the first time were only a trial run.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 15, 2014, 02:22:36 PM
What I wonder is what they will say about the previous tennants of the island. I know it's presumed that all the dinosaurs from the first movie perished due to the lysine deficiency, but it would be really cool to see that some wild dinosaurs survived and reproduced unassisted like in the first book. The movie only briefly mentions this.

I really doubt they would've built a new park in it if that was the case though  :laugh: And I'm assuming they cleared all the carcasses, but if the dinos died then I would love to see the original T-Rex's skeleton be discovered by the main group. It would be great symbolism, IMO. A "fossil" from the first movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 15, 2014, 02:42:50 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Apr 15, 2014, 02:22:36 PM
What I wonder is what they will say about the previous tennants of the island. I know it's presumed that all the dinosaurs from the first movie perished due to the lysine deficiency,

I would assume that they survived much like the dinosaurs did on Sorna. I have a feeling Trevorrow might shows us a 26 year old T-rex, AKA the original female.

Note: I say 26 year old, its just a guess going by the history of InGen and the year they grew the original dinosaurs on Sorna.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 15, 2014, 03:09:29 PM
They could work in a story where the animals adapted to the lysine deficiency and it doesn't matter anymore but I think I might prefer a story of them dying out and having to create "new dinosaurs".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 15, 2014, 03:12:48 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 15, 2014, 02:42:50 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Apr 15, 2014, 02:22:36 PM
What I wonder is what they will say about the previous tennants of the island. I know it's presumed that all the dinosaurs from the first movie perished due to the lysine deficiency,

I would assume that they survived much like the dinosaurs did on Sorna. I have a feeling Trevorrow might shows us a 26 year old T-rex, AKA the original female.

Note: I say 26 year old, its just a guess going by the history of InGen and the year they grew the original dinosaurs on Sorna.

Hmmm I never considered it could still be alive. Since in the book I think most of the dinos had short, recorded life spans. I need to keep in mind they are separate. It would be pretty crazy if we had her back for this movie! Only way that would be is if she was captured when they came back to the island. Like I said, I think they would scan and sweep the whole island before rebuilding a park there. But they could've missed a spot... :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 15, 2014, 03:16:11 PM
They could have tranquilized her and kept her alive transporting her to their enclosures.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FBkfX6XECYAAm4fd.jpg&hash=bc8d903ca11c0a129a3d9ea8e715b68959ad4953)

Or imagine if the section of the island where the original JP took place was still owned by InGen so Patel Corp had to build away from that section of the island. leaving it to evolve on its own.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 15, 2014, 03:34:28 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 15, 2014, 03:09:29 PM
They could work in a story where the animals adapted to the lysine deficiency and it doesn't matter anymore but I think I might prefer a story of them dying out and having to create "new dinosaurs".

Ultimately, I agree. I'm just speculating about certain things I wouldn't mind seeing.

As much as i would enjoy throw backs to the previous movies and/or the books, I'm very excited about the fresh start. We're dealing with an open park which was never seen or written of before.

Seeing a new Rex with another "personality" excites me too  ;D Specially considering that this one will most likely be pretty much domesticated by this point, and accustomed to humans. To see it break out and experience freedom should be cool  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 15, 2014, 03:49:21 PM
A domesticated T.Rex sounds lame, to be honest. I don't mean to downplay your idea, but I'm looking at it through the lens of a Rex that's friendly with humans and lets kids pet her. It takes away the fear aspect.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 15, 2014, 04:07:24 PM
I agree with Doom on this one.

Although I do like the idea of seeing a new Rex with a different personality to what we've seen.
Like how the Bull acts in TLW to the female in JP1.

Anyone think the female in TLW is the same as the one in the first film? As in InGen shipped it back to Sorna after the accident at the park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 15, 2014, 04:11:50 PM
I like to think they're different animals. Why would they have moved her back? I was under the impression that Nublar was totally abandoned after the accident at the park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 15, 2014, 04:22:29 PM
Well a deleted scene of The Lost world had Ludlow explaining the destruction of the Nublar facility and the animals there.
I like to think it was just left and abandoned. So I'm glad they removed that scene.

As I kid I thought it was the same female Rex because it gazes at Eddie through the window exactly the same as the female does to Lex in 1. The Rex pair also turn the trailers over much like the land cruiser. But that was my child assumption.

Whether this will be passed on in JW will only be revealed next year.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 15, 2014, 04:58:00 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 15, 2014, 01:19:21 PM
They would have been cleared out by InGen after the incident, surely.

The only embryos left would be the decaying remains of whats in the Barbasol can Nedry dropped.

I doubt either of those will come into play. Even if the embryos at the Visitor's center were still there, I kind of doubt the freezers would still have power after 20+ years. And the Barbasol can was only supposed to last so many hours, so those embryos be f**ked, too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 15, 2014, 05:04:27 PM
You know what I would really like, is a little bit more gore. This is dinosaurs eating people. There should be more blood than what we've seen in the past.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 15, 2014, 05:15:32 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Apr 15, 2014, 04:58:00 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 15, 2014, 01:19:21 PM
They would have been cleared out by InGen after the incident, surely.

The only embryos left would be the decaying remains of whats in the Barbasol can Nedry dropped.

I doubt either of those will come into play. Even if the embryos at the Visitor's center were still there, I kind of doubt the freezers would still have power after 20+ years. And the Barbasol can was only supposed to last so many hours, so those embryos be f**ked, too.

Yep. Hence the words cleared out and decaying remains.

I'm not scientific enough to know when the DNA would decompose in that can under the mud.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 15, 2014, 05:18:18 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Apr 15, 2014, 04:58:00 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 15, 2014, 01:19:21 PM
They would have been cleared out by InGen after the incident, surely.

The only embryos left would be the decaying remains of whats in the Barbasol can Nedry dropped.

I doubt either of those will come into play. Even if the embryos at the Visitor's center were still there, I kind of doubt the freezers would still have power after 20+ years. And the Barbasol can was only supposed to last so many hours, so those embryos be f**ked, too.

Actually, it just occurred to me. Alien3, I think you're on the money about the embryos having been cleared out. Simple logic.

Power is restored-->no one pays the electricity bill-->InGen shuts the island down-->recovers what little it can of its investment
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 15, 2014, 05:30:25 PM
Exactly.

It would take years to rebuild.

Hence why Ludlow sacrifices so much to try and jump start the San Diego park instead.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 15, 2014, 06:39:18 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 15, 2014, 03:49:21 PM
A domesticated T.Rex sounds lame, to be honest. I don't mean to downplay your idea, but I'm looking at it through the lens of a Rex that's friendly with humans and lets kids pet her. It takes away the fear aspect.

Well to be clear I meant that it would start out domesticated, since the park has been open for a while from the looks of it. It's all its ever known. And then when it breaks free, it learns to become the predator it truly is  8) I would like to see that transformation on the screen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: mez86 on Apr 15, 2014, 09:35:16 PM
Don't know if this has been posted yet but if it has feel haqppy to delete
http://www.patel-corp.com/index.html (http://www.patel-corp.com/index.html)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ikarop on Apr 15, 2014, 09:41:18 PM
QuoteJURASSIC WORLD SPOILER ALERT: So this has been circling the rumor mill for the last few days and it's gaining credibility. Since it happened on our watch here at the Honolulu Zoo, I figured I jump on it too. It seems a scene filmed at the zoo was some sort of interactive "petting zoo" scene that involved baby Triceratops.

I also heard the caterers fed the cast and crew Bronto-burgers for lunch..... but I can't confirm or deny that rumor.

https://www.facebook.com/ReelToursHawaii/ (https://www.facebook.com/ReelToursHawaii/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Apr 15, 2014, 09:42:19 PM
Quote from: mez86 on Apr 15, 2014, 09:35:16 PM
Don't know if this has been posted yet but if it has feel haqppy to delete
http://www.patel-corp.com/index.html (http://www.patel-corp.com/index.html)
is that an official site???
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 15, 2014, 09:55:47 PM
Quote from: ikarop on Apr 15, 2014, 09:41:18 PM
QuoteJURASSIC WORLD SPOILER ALERT: So this has been circling the rumor mill for the last few days and it's gaining credibility. Since it happened on our watch here at the Honolulu Zoo, I figured I jump on it too. It seems a scene filmed at the zoo was some sort of interactive "petting zoo" scene that involved baby Triceratops.

I also heard the caterers fed the cast and crew Bronto-burgers for lunch..... but I can't confirm or deny that rumor.

https://www.facebook.com/ReelToursHawaii/ (https://www.facebook.com/ReelToursHawaii/)

That sounds cool.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: mez86 on Apr 15, 2014, 09:58:50 PM
Quote from: frenchfries on Apr 15, 2014, 09:42:19 PM
Quote from: mez86 on Apr 15, 2014, 09:35:16 PM
Don't know if this has been posted yet but if it has feel haqppy to delete
http://www.patel-corp.com/index.html (http://www.patel-corp.com/index.html)
is that an official site???

no idea i found it on jp legacy forum
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 15, 2014, 10:03:13 PM
Quote from: mez86 on Apr 15, 2014, 09:58:50 PM
Quote from: frenchfries on Apr 15, 2014, 09:42:19 PM
Quote from: mez86 on Apr 15, 2014, 09:35:16 PM
Don't know if this has been posted yet but if it has feel haqppy to delete
http://www.patel-corp.com/index.html (http://www.patel-corp.com/index.html)
is that an official site???

no idea i found it on jp legacy forum

It looks pretty legit to me. It's not all that far off from the Weyland site for Prometheus. Pi is looking suitably sleazy at the bottom there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 15, 2014, 11:38:29 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 15, 2014, 03:16:11 PM
Or imagine if the section of the island where the original JP took place was still owned by InGen so Patel Corp had to build away from that section of the island. leaving it to evolve on its own.

Oh my God.  This!

Lovely reading all these ideas  ;D

Quote from: ikarop on Apr 15, 2014, 09:41:18 PM
QuoteJURASSIC WORLD SPOILER ALERT: So this has been circling the rumor mill for the last few days and it's gaining credibility. Since it happened on our watch here at the Honolulu Zoo, I figured I jump on it too. It seems a scene filmed at the zoo was some sort of interactive "petting zoo" scene that involved baby Triceratops.

I also heard the caterers fed the cast and crew Bronto-burgers for lunch..... but I can't confirm or deny that rumor.

https://www.facebook.com/ReelToursHawaii/ (https://www.facebook.com/ReelToursHawaii/)

Bring in that unused baby Trike that SWS made for JP1!

Quote from: KiramidHead on Apr 15, 2014, 10:03:13 PM
Quote from: mez86 on Apr 15, 2014, 09:58:50 PM
Quote from: frenchfries on Apr 15, 2014, 09:42:19 PM
Quote from: mez86 on Apr 15, 2014, 09:35:16 PM
Don't know if this has been posted yet but if it has feel haqppy to delete
http://www.patel-corp.com/index.html (http://www.patel-corp.com/index.html)
is that an official site???

no idea i found it on jp legacy forum

It looks pretty legit to me. It's not all that far off from the Weyland site for Prometheus. Pi is looking suitably sleazy at the bottom there.

Spoiler
Alien3 and a few other fans are responsible for that clever site 8)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Apr 16, 2014, 12:07:44 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 15, 2014, 01:19:21 PM
They would have been cleared out by InGen after the incident, surely.

The only embryos left would be the decaying remains of whats in the Barbasol can Nedry dropped.
Going by the Jurassic Park game that Telltale released a year or so ago, we know the fate of the Barbasol can.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Apr 16, 2014, 12:25:18 AM
Quote from: mez86 on Apr 15, 2014, 09:35:16 PM
Don't know if this has been posted yet but if it has feel haqppy to delete
http://www.patel-corp.com/index.html (http://www.patel-corp.com/index.html)

This is f**king awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 16, 2014, 12:31:47 AM
from that website

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=716BqDv49lA#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=716BqDv49lA#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Apr 16, 2014, 12:36:32 AM
Okay that's pretty cool.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 16, 2014, 12:42:33 AM
some possible set photos

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bjo-qoqCIAAnAE7.jpg:large)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Biw02gwCEAAxXyp.jpg:large)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 16, 2014, 02:06:31 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgADUIojWHY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgADUIojWHY#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qO0ufg2DNrw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qO0ufg2DNrw#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 16, 2014, 02:25:11 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Apr 16, 2014, 12:42:33 AM
some possible set photos

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bjo-qoqCIAAnAE7.jpg:large)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Biw02gwCEAAxXyp.jpg:large)

Hmmmm, looks like a worn down facility.  Looks like we just might see some abandoned structures in this one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Apr 16, 2014, 05:13:13 AM
I'm just happy Jake Johnson is in this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 16, 2014, 08:42:03 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 16, 2014, 12:07:44 AM
Going by the Jurassic Park game that Telltale released a year or so ago, we know the fate of the Barbasol can.

I personally don't consider the game canon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 16, 2014, 11:08:51 AM
They considered the game canon when they made it, if I remember rightly. But as with Colonial Marines, these games are only canon for as long as suits marketing purposes. If Jurassic World's scriptwriters found an idea for the Barbasol can that fits in nicely, the game will be swiftly forgotten.

Personally though, I'd rather it stayed buried in the mud with the rest of Nedry's dreams.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 16, 2014, 11:16:53 AM
I've said it before and I'll say it again: that game is the best sequel we will ever have to JP because it followed up the story in a perfectly logical way. Of course, my opinion may change after JW is released.

Those set photos look nifty. I'm guessing one is an animal enclosure, the other a tool shed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Apr 16, 2014, 11:55:40 AM
Patel Corp is trying hard to be the new Weyland Yutani. I cringe every time I read their slogan because I think of Building Better Worlds.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Apr 16, 2014, 12:03:58 PM
You guys are aware of the fact the whole Patel Corp website/video deal is fan-made, right? ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 16, 2014, 01:31:05 PM
That's what I said

Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 15, 2014, 11:38:29 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Apr 15, 2014, 10:03:13 PM
Quote from: mez86 on Apr 15, 2014, 09:58:50 PM
Quote from: frenchfries on Apr 15, 2014, 09:42:19 PM
Quote from: mez86 on Apr 15, 2014, 09:35:16 PM
Don't know if this has been posted yet but if it has feel haqppy to delete
http://www.patel-corp.com/index.html (http://www.patel-corp.com/index.html)
is that an official site???

no idea i found it on jp legacy forum

It looks pretty legit to me. It's not all that far off from the Weyland site for Prometheus. Pi is looking suitably sleazy at the bottom there.

Spoiler
Alien3 and a few other fans are responsible for that clever site 8)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: markweatherill on Apr 16, 2014, 02:45:14 PM
Dinosaurs and aliens. That would work, right? But no Predators.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 16, 2014, 03:34:02 PM
No. It would not.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Apr 17, 2014, 02:29:33 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 16, 2014, 08:42:03 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 16, 2014, 12:07:44 AM
Going by the Jurassic Park game that Telltale released a year or so ago, we know the fate of the Barbasol can.

I personally don't consider the game canon.
Well it totally is and there's nothing you can do about it. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr. Sin on Apr 17, 2014, 03:05:36 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 17, 2014, 02:29:33 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 16, 2014, 08:42:03 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 16, 2014, 12:07:44 AM
Going by the Jurassic Park game that Telltale released a year or so ago, we know the fate of the Barbasol can.

I personally don't consider the game canon.
Well it totally is and there's nothing you can do about it. :P

I was not aware the game was considered canon by Universal. Interesting revelation.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 17, 2014, 03:29:35 AM
It probably isn't. As good or bad as it is (I don't know, I haven't played it) I doubt they're going to adhere to the game's story if the story that they want to tell contradicts it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 17, 2014, 03:44:14 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 17, 2014, 03:29:35 AM
It probably isn't. As good or bad as it is (I don't know, I haven't played it) I doubt they're going to adhere to the game's story if the story that they want to tell contradicts it.

It's ok as far as the story goes. Wouldn't mind it being canon honestly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 17, 2014, 03:55:31 AM
I saw a weird clip from that game where one of the park employees is talking to one of the dinos like a pet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 17, 2014, 04:22:43 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Apr 17, 2014, 03:55:31 AM
I saw a weird clip from that game where one of the park employees is talking to one of the dinos like a pet.

Wut. Don't recall.

Wait was it an older scientist lady?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 17, 2014, 05:35:58 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Apr 17, 2014, 04:22:43 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Apr 17, 2014, 03:55:31 AM
I saw a weird clip from that game where one of the park employees is talking to one of the dinos like a pet.

Wut. Don't recall.

Wait was it an older scientist lady?

No I think it was a guy, herding one into an enclosure.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 17, 2014, 11:23:56 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 17, 2014, 03:29:35 AM
It probably isn't. As good or bad as it is (I don't know, I haven't played it) I doubt they're going to adhere to the game's story if the story that they want to tell contradicts it.

It's not bad. It's more of an interactive movie than a game. I would recommend giving it a look if you're a fan of JP.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 17, 2014, 11:33:02 AM
I do love Telltale's style. Their Walking Dead game is one of my favorites, and I'm really looking forward to their take on Game of Thrones.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 17, 2014, 03:19:30 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 17, 2014, 11:33:02 AM
I do love Telltale's style. Their Walking Dead game is one of my favorites, and I'm really looking forward to their take on Game of Thrones.

It's a pretty good story and it reveals the fate of the Barbasol can, but the game is glitchy as hell. Like Doom said, it's more like a movie than a game. I loved that about it, but the glitchy transitions broke the immersion.

I think it still is a must have for any JP fan. Specially because of the extra dinosaurs and exhibits.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Apr 17, 2014, 03:37:28 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 17, 2014, 11:33:02 AM
I do love Telltale's style. Their Walking Dead game is one of my favorites, and I'm really looking forward to their take on Game of Thrones.
Yeah, Telltale is awesome, but some of their first games, like Jurassic Park, were pretty mediocre to be honest.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 17, 2014, 04:54:15 PM
Quote from: Gate on Apr 16, 2014, 11:55:40 AM
Patel Corp is trying hard to be the new Weyland Yutani. I cringe every time I read their slogan because I think of Building Better Worlds.

We came up with "Improving Future Horizons" as a play on the InGen slogan "We Make Your Future"

As seen in The Lost World...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg1.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20120808020719%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2F6%2F6a%2F236.jpg&hash=afa9319a90757a825f8a860dbf2a31c1f3c3f90b)

Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 17, 2014, 02:29:33 AM
Well it totally is and there's nothing you can do about it. :P

Canon is opinion, like it says in your sig. So yes I can.

The game isn't in my personal canon, and there's nothing you can do about that. :-*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 17, 2014, 05:54:44 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 17, 2014, 02:29:33 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 16, 2014, 08:42:03 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 16, 2014, 12:07:44 AM
Going by the Jurassic Park game that Telltale released a year or so ago, we know the fate of the Barbasol can.

I personally don't consider the game canon.
Well it totally is and there's nothing you can do about it. :P

According to who, exactly?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 17, 2014, 06:07:36 PM
My Jurassic Park podcast now has T-shirts for sale!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.yipptee.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F04%2Ffinal-mock-510x600.png&hash=b8445637df898993be17b8f5799dc73c27e904fc)

If anyone fancies one go to JPforever.com 8)

Spoiler
Free US shipping ;)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Apr 18, 2014, 05:52:17 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 17, 2014, 05:54:44 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 17, 2014, 02:29:33 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 16, 2014, 08:42:03 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 16, 2014, 12:07:44 AM
Going by the Jurassic Park game that Telltale released a year or so ago, we know the fate of the Barbasol can.

I personally don't consider the game canon.
Well it totally is and there's nothing you can do about it. :P

According to who, exactly?

Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 17, 2014, 04:54:15 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 17, 2014, 02:29:33 AM
Well it totally is and there's nothing you can do about it. :P

Canon is opinion, like it says in your sig. So yes I can.

The game isn't in my personal canon, and there's nothing you can do about that. :-*
You... you guys realize I was being a tad less than serious, right? :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr. Sin on Apr 18, 2014, 07:31:20 AM
Personal canon is a phrase that reeks of another; cop out.

Personal canon is the basis for nothing of value to all, ergo, is self serving and quite ineffectual.

The afore stated is canon in defense of the word canon.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 18, 2014, 08:10:39 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 18, 2014, 05:52:17 AM
You... you guys realize I was being a tad less than serious, right? :P

You...you realise you're on the internet? We don't take kindly to jokes about canon. :P

Quote from: Mr. Sin on Apr 18, 2014, 07:31:20 AM
Personal canon is the basis for nothing of value to all, ergo, is self serving and quite ineffectual.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reactiongifs.us%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F04%2Fdoesnt_make_any_sense_anchorman.gif&hash=7c1fa78fa7320f73cbe46b605d0d386a8d586e65)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 18, 2014, 11:32:21 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 18, 2014, 05:52:17 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 17, 2014, 05:54:44 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 17, 2014, 02:29:33 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 16, 2014, 08:42:03 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 16, 2014, 12:07:44 AM
Going by the Jurassic Park game that Telltale released a year or so ago, we know the fate of the Barbasol can.

I personally don't consider the game canon.
Well it totally is and there's nothing you can do about it. :P

According to who, exactly?

Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 17, 2014, 04:54:15 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 17, 2014, 02:29:33 AM
Well it totally is and there's nothing you can do about it. :P

Canon is opinion, like it says in your sig. So yes I can.

The game isn't in my personal canon, and there's nothing you can do about that. :-*
You... you guys realize I was being a tad less than serious, right? :P

No I didn't. Because in the past, you've demonstrated your unconditional loyalty to the idea that everything in the A/P universe is canon so it's not hard to imagine you feel the same about JP. Granted you're not quite predxeno, but you're almost there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The1PerfectOrganism on Apr 18, 2014, 12:32:14 PM
Doom hit the nail on the head.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 18, 2014, 01:04:48 PM
ALRIGHT!

Where's that podcast?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 18, 2014, 01:16:00 PM
Its out now!

jpforever.com
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Apr 18, 2014, 10:03:57 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 18, 2014, 11:32:21 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 18, 2014, 05:52:17 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 17, 2014, 05:54:44 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 17, 2014, 02:29:33 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 16, 2014, 08:42:03 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 16, 2014, 12:07:44 AM
Going by the Jurassic Park game that Telltale released a year or so ago, we know the fate of the Barbasol can.

I personally don't consider the game canon.
Well it totally is and there's nothing you can do about it. :P

According to who, exactly?

Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 17, 2014, 04:54:15 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 17, 2014, 02:29:33 AM
Well it totally is and there's nothing you can do about it. :P

Canon is opinion, like it says in your sig. So yes I can.

The game isn't in my personal canon, and there's nothing you can do about that. :-*
You... you guys realize I was being a tad less than serious, right? :P

No I didn't. Because in the past, you've demonstrated your unconditional loyalty to the idea that everything in the A/P universe is canon so it's not hard to imagine you feel the same about JP. Granted you're not quite predxeno, but you're almost there.
My views on canon for AvP only apply to AvP. There's a shitton of JP stuff I don't take as "canon". Any of the Topps comic books that feature returning main characters from the movies, for instance.

Having said that, I'm very willing to accept the Telltale game as canon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 18, 2014, 10:16:10 PM
Just listened to the new pod cast.  Never knew they shot the scene with Spino snatching Nash from the plane in reverse!  Mr. Young seemed like a real fine fellow!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 18, 2014, 10:17:38 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 18, 2014, 10:03:57 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 18, 2014, 11:32:21 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 18, 2014, 05:52:17 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 17, 2014, 05:54:44 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 17, 2014, 02:29:33 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 16, 2014, 08:42:03 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 16, 2014, 12:07:44 AM
Going by the Jurassic Park game that Telltale released a year or so ago, we know the fate of the Barbasol can.

I personally don't consider the game canon.
Well it totally is and there's nothing you can do about it. :P

According to who, exactly?

Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 17, 2014, 04:54:15 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 17, 2014, 02:29:33 AM
Well it totally is and there's nothing you can do about it. :P

Canon is opinion, like it says in your sig. So yes I can.

The game isn't in my personal canon, and there's nothing you can do about that. :-*
You... you guys realize I was being a tad less than serious, right? :P

No I didn't. Because in the past, you've demonstrated your unconditional loyalty to the idea that everything in the A/P universe is canon so it's not hard to imagine you feel the same about JP. Granted you're not quite predxeno, but you're almost there.
My views on canon for AvP only apply to AvP. There's a shitton of JP stuff I don't take as "canon". Any of the Topps comic books that feature returning main characters from the movies, for instance.

Having said that, I'm very willing to accept the Telltale game as canon.

Accepting it as canon makes very little sense because it's never referenced anywhere else. It has zero impact on the actual JP universe.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Apr 18, 2014, 10:30:42 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 18, 2014, 10:17:38 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 18, 2014, 10:03:57 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 18, 2014, 11:32:21 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 18, 2014, 05:52:17 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 17, 2014, 05:54:44 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 17, 2014, 02:29:33 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 16, 2014, 08:42:03 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 16, 2014, 12:07:44 AM
Going by the Jurassic Park game that Telltale released a year or so ago, we know the fate of the Barbasol can.

I personally don't consider the game canon.
Well it totally is and there's nothing you can do about it. :P

According to who, exactly?

Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 17, 2014, 04:54:15 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 17, 2014, 02:29:33 AM
Well it totally is and there's nothing you can do about it. :P

Canon is opinion, like it says in your sig. So yes I can.

The game isn't in my personal canon, and there's nothing you can do about that. :-*
You... you guys realize I was being a tad less than serious, right? :P

No I didn't. Because in the past, you've demonstrated your unconditional loyalty to the idea that everything in the A/P universe is canon so it's not hard to imagine you feel the same about JP. Granted you're not quite predxeno, but you're almost there.
My views on canon for AvP only apply to AvP. There's a shitton of JP stuff I don't take as "canon". Any of the Topps comic books that feature returning main characters from the movies, for instance.

Having said that, I'm very willing to accept the Telltale game as canon.

Accepting it as canon makes very little sense because it's never referenced anywhere else. It has zero impact on the actual JP universe.
It's never referenced anywhere else since nothing else has come out TO reference it. It's like saying 'Aliens' isn't canon because 'Alien' didn't reference it.

As for having "zero impact", I don't even know what that means. It's a fun story that happens during/after 'Jurassic Park' that doesn't really contradict anything (other than Harding having no beard) so I don't see a problem with taking it as "canon".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 18, 2014, 11:01:31 PM
Canon, is like your opinion, man.

Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 18, 2014, 10:16:10 PM
Just listened to the new pod cast.  Never knew they shot the scene with Spino snatching Nash from the plane in reverse!  Mr. Young seemed like a real fine fellow!

Yeah I was surprised to learn that too.

They pulled it off nicely I think.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Apr 18, 2014, 11:12:08 PM
(https://31.media.tumblr.com/99e95d2bc6a0d0d662e1a2d3010265df/tumblr_n0ooo7W57T1qdlh1io1_400.gif)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Apr 18, 2014, 11:24:24 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 18, 2014, 11:01:31 PM
Canon, is like your opinion, man.
No shit :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 19, 2014, 08:06:07 AM
Exactly, 

If you want the game as canon, you have it as canon. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 19, 2014, 09:14:38 AM
Quote from: Gate on Apr 18, 2014, 11:12:08 PM
https://31.media.tumblr.com/99e95d2bc6a0d0d662e1a2d3010265df/tumblr_n0ooo7W57T1qdlh1io1_400.gif

The posture, gait and muscle use look pretty accurate, but it's unknown whether dinosaurs would have bobbed their heads while walking. Not all birds do it, and it's unknown why some do and others don't - it can differ in animals with the same ecological specialty, physiology or even evolutionary group. It seems the reason for it is to provide depth information (as most birds have limited overlap in their eyes' field of view), so dinosaurs with decent binocular vision (such as Tyrannosaurus) very likely wouldn't have done it.

Also, the first toe in dinosaurs is typically vestigial. The chicken's is reversed and extended into a hallux for walking stability, which may be affecting the gait.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Apr 19, 2014, 10:42:19 AM
Quote from: Gate on Apr 18, 2014, 11:12:08 PM
https://31.media.tumblr.com/99e95d2bc6a0d0d662e1a2d3010265df/tumblr_n0ooo7W57T1qdlh1io1_400.gif
[/quote

That is one funny gif.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 19, 2014, 04:51:20 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Apr 19, 2014, 09:14:38 AM
Quote from: Gate on Apr 18, 2014, 11:12:08 PM
https://31.media.tumblr.com/99e95d2bc6a0d0d662e1a2d3010265df/tumblr_n0ooo7W57T1qdlh1io1_400.gif

The posture, gait and muscle use look pretty accurate, but it's unknown whether dinosaurs would have bobbed their heads while walking. Not all birds do it, and it's unknown why some do and others don't - it can differ in animals with the same ecological specialty, physiology or even evolutionary group. It seems the reason for it is to provide depth information (as most birds have limited overlap in their eyes' field of view), so dinosaurs with decent binocular vision (such as Tyrannosaurus) very likely wouldn't have done it.

Also, the first toe in dinosaurs is typically vestigial. The chicken's is reversed and extended into a hallux for walking stability, which may be affecting the gait.

If anyone believes JP, they did. The Procompsognathus that kills the little girl near the beginning did just that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 20, 2014, 12:06:41 AM
Holy shit!

John Williams to score Jurassic World?

http://www.supermansupersite.com/0419144.html (http://www.supermansupersite.com/0419144.html)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 20, 2014, 12:07:20 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 20, 2014, 12:06:41 AM
Holy shit!

John Williams to score Jurassic World?

http://www.supermansupersite.com/0419144.html (http://www.supermansupersite.com/0419144.html)

If true, then f**k yeah.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 20, 2014, 01:19:39 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 20, 2014, 12:06:41 AM
Holy shit!

John Williams to score Jurassic World?

http://www.supermansupersite.com/0419144.html (http://www.supermansupersite.com/0419144.html)

Please!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomorphine on Apr 20, 2014, 02:14:52 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 20, 2014, 12:06:41 AM
Holy shit!

John Williams to score Jurassic World?

http://www.supermansupersite.com/0419144.html (http://www.supermansupersite.com/0419144.html)

Why was this ever possibly in doubt?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Apr 20, 2014, 05:39:10 AM
Because he didn't return for Jurassic park 3
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 20, 2014, 05:48:59 AM
And he has Star Wars 7 lined up as well. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Apr 20, 2014, 08:26:10 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 20, 2014, 12:06:41 AM
Holy shit!

John Williams to score Jurassic World?

http://www.supermansupersite.com/0419144.html (http://www.supermansupersite.com/0419144.html)
f**k YES.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Apr 20, 2014, 08:28:58 AM
John Williams is the man.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Apr 20, 2014, 08:48:32 PM
I'm gonna need solid confirmation before crying tears of joy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Apr 20, 2014, 09:11:44 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Apr 20, 2014, 08:48:32 PM
I'm gonna need solid confirmation before crying tears of joy.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F24.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_liqe4oBs7O1qi2rejo1_500.jpg&hash=9ad0ceb7940a8791552d89640da3e1df3f1adfcc)

Tears of joy are upon you whether you would want it or not.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 20, 2014, 10:16:46 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 20, 2014, 12:06:41 AM
Holy shit!

John Williams to score Jurassic World?

http://www.supermansupersite.com/0419144.html (http://www.supermansupersite.com/0419144.html)

One can hope.

Still no word on dinosaurs though :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 20, 2014, 10:19:15 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 20, 2014, 10:16:46 PM

Still no word on dinosaurs though :(

It's gonna open with the Spinos killing all the Rexes. And Raptor Jesus saves the day at the end.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 20, 2014, 10:36:04 PM
Can't be, I didn't audition.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 20, 2014, 10:41:42 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 20, 2014, 10:16:46 PM
Still no word on dinosaurs though :(

Last I heard they were cut from the script after the most recent rewrite.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 20, 2014, 10:49:56 PM
oh yeah, dino-human hybrids, I forgot.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Apr 20, 2014, 11:05:36 PM
t-rex with chaingun arm pls
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 21, 2014, 09:38:53 AM
Anyone on here entered the competition on our podcast?

jpforever.com
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 21, 2014, 11:16:54 AM
What's the contest?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 21, 2014, 01:41:27 PM
You just have to message Bad Lizards through twitter saying you love JC ;)

You can enter if you don't like us.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 21, 2014, 02:47:50 PM
Tweeted!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 21, 2014, 06:14:40 PM
Nice!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 21, 2014, 10:38:51 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Apr 20, 2014, 11:05:36 PM
t-rex with chaingun arm pls
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg0.joyreactor.cc%2Fpics%2Fpost%2Ffull%2F%25D0%25B0%25D1%2580%25D1%2582-%25D0%25BA%25D1%2580%25D0%25B0%25D1%2581%25D0%25B8%25D0%25B2%25D1%258B%25D0%25B5-%25D0%25BA%25D0%25B0%25D1%2580%25D1%2582%25D0%25B8%25D0%25BD%25D0%25BA%25D0%25B8-t-rex-Wexter-746298.jpeg&hash=ec345917182a5018a9e559cfc75d86c5205d65a0)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 21, 2014, 10:41:20 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Apr 21, 2014, 10:38:51 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Apr 20, 2014, 11:05:36 PM
t-rex with chaingun arm pls
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg0.joyreactor.cc%2Fpics%2Fpost%2Ffull%2F%25D0%25B0%25D1%2580%25D1%2582-%25D0%25BA%25D1%2580%25D0%25B0%25D1%2581%25D0%25B8%25D0%25B2%25D1%258B%25D0%25B5-%25D0%25BA%25D0%25B0%25D1%2580%25D1%2582%25D0%25B8%25D0%25BD%25D0%25BA%25D0%25B8-t-rex-Wexter-746298.jpeg&hash=ec345917182a5018a9e559cfc75d86c5205d65a0)

He ain't got time to bleed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 22, 2014, 02:32:08 AM
A seriously massive shipment arrived today and as usual, that means pics and videos!! Enjoy ;D

http://instagram.com/p/nEMOknFEv6/ (http://instagram.com/p/nEMOknFEv6/)
http://instagram.com/p/nEOc1RlEjA/ (http://instagram.com/p/nEOc1RlEjA/)
http://instagram.com/p/nEO0qYFEjp/ (http://instagram.com/p/nEO0qYFEjp/)
http://instagram.com/p/nEPqgilEk-/ (http://instagram.com/p/nEPqgilEk-/)
http://instagram.com/p/nEQKb9lElw/ (http://instagram.com/p/nEQKb9lElw/)
http://instagram.com/p/nEQ9uJlEm4/ (http://instagram.com/p/nEQ9uJlEm4/)
http://instagram.com/p/nERvl_FEoO/ (http://instagram.com/p/nERvl_FEoO/)
http://instagram.com/p/nESjyzlEpx/ (http://instagram.com/p/nESjyzlEpx/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Apr 22, 2014, 03:18:14 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Apr 21, 2014, 10:38:51 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Apr 20, 2014, 11:05:36 PM
t-rex with chaingun arm pls
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg0.joyreactor.cc%2Fpics%2Fpost%2Ffull%2F%25D0%25B0%25D1%2580%25D1%2582-%25D0%25BA%25D1%2580%25D0%25B0%25D1%2581%25D0%25B8%25D0%25B2%25D1%258B%25D0%25B5-%25D0%25BA%25D0%25B0%25D1%2580%25D1%2582%25D0%25B8%25D0%25BD%25D0%25BA%25D0%25B8-t-rex-Wexter-746298.jpeg&hash=ec345917182a5018a9e559cfc75d86c5205d65a0)

f**k YEAHAAARGH

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2F2g4MIBQAhCu6Q%2Fgiphy.gif&hash=9cf406cafa950c573b243ec1cde2282ced860a0d)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 22, 2014, 04:24:44 AM
(https://fbcdn-photos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/t1.0-0/10011337_10152016605306615_4730386405837794171_n.png)

(https://fbcdn-photos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/t1.0-0/p600x600/10001479_10152016440881615_4758170094654107462_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 22, 2014, 01:39:16 PM
Nice! I hope we get to see the final designs soon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 22, 2014, 02:13:58 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 22, 2014, 02:32:08 AM
A seriously massive shipment arrived today and as usual, that means pics and videos!! Enjoy ;D

http://instagram.com/p/nEMOknFEv6/ (http://instagram.com/p/nEMOknFEv6/)
http://instagram.com/p/nEOc1RlEjA/ (http://instagram.com/p/nEOc1RlEjA/)
http://instagram.com/p/nEO0qYFEjp/ (http://instagram.com/p/nEO0qYFEjp/)
http://instagram.com/p/nEPqgilEk-/ (http://instagram.com/p/nEPqgilEk-/)
http://instagram.com/p/nEQKb9lElw/ (http://instagram.com/p/nEQKb9lElw/)
http://instagram.com/p/nEQ9uJlEm4/ (http://instagram.com/p/nEQ9uJlEm4/)
http://instagram.com/p/nERvl_FEoO/ (http://instagram.com/p/nERvl_FEoO/)
http://instagram.com/p/nESjyzlEpx/ (http://instagram.com/p/nESjyzlEpx/)

Holy shit man that's an awesome shipment. Mega-jel right here!

Your collection must be massive, am I right?
You better be planning some kick ass collection video or something.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 22, 2014, 02:37:09 PM
You know what? It's funny you mention that because I was thinking of doing just that, not quite like yours but rather, individual videos highlighting certain toys and such. The only problem is that I don't have a professional-grade camera. My webcam obviously isn't portable and while there is the camera on my phone, I feel like people wouldn't want to watch a video that's shaped like a small, vertical rectangle :P

Besides, what are you jealous for? I'm sure you have most of the same stuff, haha.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 22, 2014, 02:43:58 PM
Out of those you posted I only have the big red Rex, and the Trike.

Yeah man if you get a camera you should totally make a channel for videos like that.

Have you seen this channel? https://www.youtube.com/user/JurassicCollectables (https://www.youtube.com/user/JurassicCollectables)

We're getting him on the podcast soon for a chat because his channel is amazing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr. Sin on Apr 22, 2014, 03:04:14 PM
I do hope they make the Tyrannosaurus Rex a key character again. I do find spinosaurus to be fascinating, but the Rex is at the apex of my love for paleontology.

Perhaps we will one day get to see an anatomically correct Velociraptor as well, as the raptorial claw is always depicted in such a way as to resemble deinonychus, a different bipedal species. Dr. Grant even states the claw is on the middle toe, yet it still reflects otherwise. As it is, understanding of the animals, theoretically, has changed radically since 1993, so more than just a toe would benefit from a redesign to stay current.

Deinonychus
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi60.tinypic.com%2F2zp1e95.jpg&hash=67c8e1f9369bccc0282a6607054fd2bf8291d7c1)

Current view of velociraptor
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi58.tinypic.com%2F2vn2o3r.jpg&hash=6a5c77c4e239677f0d8f329e2ec87fd7bd15f1eb)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 22, 2014, 03:34:45 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 22, 2014, 02:43:58 PM
Out of those you posted I only have the big red Rex, and the Trike.

Yeah man if you get a camera you should totally make a channel for videos like that.

Have you seen this channel? https://www.youtube.com/user/JurassicCollectables (https://www.youtube.com/user/JurassicCollectables)

We're getting him on the podcast soon for a chat because his channel is amazing.

Yup, I've seen those! If you really want to get someone noteworthy when it comes to collectibles on your show, contact these guys.

http://stores.ebay.ca/Stephaniezrncic95s-Store?_rdc=1 (http://stores.ebay.ca/Stephaniezrncic95s-Store?_rdc=1)

Derek and Ken Zrncic. They were featured on the Toy Hunter and I regularly do business with them. Heck, we consider each other friends at this point. Believe me when I say that they are unrivaled when it comes to JP collecting.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 22, 2014, 04:06:14 PM
Quote from: Mr. Sin on Apr 22, 2014, 03:04:14 PMPerhaps we will one day get to see an anatomically correct Velociraptor as well, as the raptorial claw is always depicted in such a way as to resemble deinonychus, a different bipedal species. Dr. Grant even states the claw is on the middle toe, yet it still reflects otherwise. As it is, understanding of the animals, theoretically, has changed radically since 1993, so more than just a toe would benefit from a redesign to stay current.

Erm, I've never noticed an issue with the JP foot design, and there's not much difference between a Velociraptor foot and a Deinonychus foot - as far as I know it's mainly just size, and minor differences in claw shape (which varies between individuals). In both animals (and all dromies and troodontids), the first toe is small and more or less vestigial, raised well beyond ground level. The second toe is the 'killing claw', and the third and fourth toes are the ones they walked on.

Jurassic Park's 'Velociraptors' are supposed to be Deinonychus anyway, which is a long story - though even then, they're far too big, and most closely match Achillobator in size (the second-largest known member of that family).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 22, 2014, 04:18:04 PM
I just call them Novaraptor, a la Primal Carnage. Seems easiest.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 22, 2014, 06:24:05 PM
Just a short video I whipped up in an hour...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51Za8lQqgqs (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51Za8lQqgqs)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr. Sin on Apr 22, 2014, 06:43:35 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 22, 2014, 06:24:05 PM
Just a short video I whipped up in an hour...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51Za8lQqgqs (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51Za8lQqgqs)

I've heard of this on cracked.com once. Interesting metaphor, indeed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Apr 23, 2014, 01:08:37 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 22, 2014, 02:37:09 PM
You know what? It's funny you mention that because I was thinking of doing just that, not quite like yours but rather, individual videos highlighting certain toys and such. The only problem is that I don't have a professional-grade camera. My webcam obviously isn't portable and while there is the camera on my phone, I feel like people wouldn't want to watch a video that's shaped like a small, vertical rectangle :P

Besides, what are you jealous for? I'm sure you have most of the same stuff, haha.
I should break out all my JP stuff and snap some pics. I've got near-complete collections of JP and TLW toys, and a bunch of JP3 stuff (and other odds and ends).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 23, 2014, 03:25:56 AM
New Jurassic World set photos suggest we'll re-visit locations from Jurassic Park!

http://www.scified.com/site/jurassicworld/new-jurassic-world-set-photos-suggest-well-re-visit-lo :)cations-from-jurassic-park (http://www.scified.com/site/jurassicworld/new-jurassic-world-set-photos-suggest-well-re-visit-lo%20:)cations-from-jurassic-park)

(https://fbcdn-photos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc1/t1.0-0/10151241_10152018271421615_2414050787175266780_n.png)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2014, 11:24:33 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 23, 2014, 01:08:37 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 22, 2014, 02:37:09 PM
You know what? It's funny you mention that because I was thinking of doing just that, not quite like yours but rather, individual videos highlighting certain toys and such. The only problem is that I don't have a professional-grade camera. My webcam obviously isn't portable and while there is the camera on my phone, I feel like people wouldn't want to watch a video that's shaped like a small, vertical rectangle :P

Besides, what are you jealous for? I'm sure you have most of the same stuff, haha.
I should break out all my JP stuff and snap some pics. I've got near-complete collections of JP and TLW toys, and a bunch of JP3 stuff (and other odds and ends).

What sort of condition are they in?

Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 23, 2014, 03:25:56 AM
New Jurassic World set photos suggest we'll re-visit locations from Jurassic Park!

http://www.scified.com/site/jurassicworld/new-jurassic-world-set-photos-suggest-well-re-visit-lo :)cations-from-jurassic-park (http://www.scified.com/site/jurassicworld/new-jurassic-world-set-photos-suggest-well-re-visit-lo%20:)cations-from-jurassic-park)

https://fbcdn-photos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc1/t1.0-0/10151241_10152018271421615_2414050787175266780_n.png

The comments have me intrigued. A new dino enclosure? Yes please!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 23, 2014, 01:00:16 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2014, 11:24:33 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 23, 2014, 03:25:56 AM
New Jurassic World set photos suggest we'll re-visit locations from Jurassic Park!

http://www.scified.com/site/jurassicworld/new-jurassic-world-set-photos-suggest-well-re-visit-lo :)cations-from-jurassic-park (http://www.scified.com/site/jurassicworld/new-jurassic-world-set-photos-suggest-well-re-visit-lo%20:)cations-from-jurassic-park)

https://fbcdn-photos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc1/t1.0-0/10151241_10152018271421615_2414050787175266780_n.png

The comments have me intrigued. A new dino enclosure? Yes please!

Almost reminds me of the emergency bunker or the raptor pen in the first.  It can't possibly be a new JW building.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2014, 01:31:22 PM
That looks too big to be the emergency bunker. It also didn't have stairs on the side of it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Apr 23, 2014, 02:24:28 PM
Jurassic World to get sequels!

http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=40832 (http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=40832)

HYPE HYPE HYPE HYPE!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2014, 02:50:54 PM
Quote from: ディロフォサウルス on Apr 23, 2014, 02:24:28 PM
Jurassic World to get sequels!

http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=40832 (http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=40832)

HYPE HYPE HYPE HYPE!!!

QuoteTrevorrow, though, was happy to confirm that he'll be using animatronic dinosaurs and elaborated on the movie's broader set-up.

Yes. I am happy about this. Sequels sound nice, but let's wait to see how this one turns out first.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 23, 2014, 02:52:47 PM
Plot Twist: Chris Pratt's character was a master builder all along, and the sequels will cross over with the Lego Movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Apr 23, 2014, 02:56:55 PM
I just watched Colin's first feature length film called Safety Not Guaranteed, it was actually pretty good. I'm curious to see how he transitions from a small movie like that to a much bigger scale film like Jurassic World.

but jake johnson and chris pratt are in this so there is so much win already
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 23, 2014, 03:15:09 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Apr 23, 2014, 02:52:47 PM
Plot Twist: Chris Pratt's character was a master builder all along, and the sequels will cross over with the Lego Movie.

Double Plot Twist: the third movie ends with Chris Pratt going off into space, revealing it was a prequel to Guardians of the Galaxy.

Spoiler
Dinosaurs in the MCU.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2014, 04:10:26 PM
There have been, in the final two issues of Cable and Deadpool. And it was awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 23, 2014, 04:22:08 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2014, 04:10:26 PM
There have been, in the final two issues of Cable and Deadpool. And it was awesome.

That's not MCU  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 23, 2014, 04:23:53 PM
There were rumors of a Savage Land movie a few years back :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 23, 2014, 04:38:08 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 23, 2014, 04:23:53 PM
There were rumors of a Savage Land movie a few years back :D

If only  :'(  lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 23, 2014, 04:46:41 PM
This is fantastic news. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 23, 2014, 04:51:44 PM
Colin Trevorrow confirms animatronic dinosaurs and developing sequels!

http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=40832 (http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=40832)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2014, 04:53:31 PM
'tis on zee previous page, monsieur.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 23, 2014, 04:55:09 PM
Shit!

I was too happy to check!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Apr 23, 2014, 06:22:45 PM
http://insidemovies.ew.com/2014/04/23/jurassic-world-exclusive-photos/ (http://insidemovies.ew.com/2014/04/23/jurassic-world-exclusive-photos/)

First set pics, nothing crazy.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg2.timeinc.net%2Few%2Fi%2F2014%2F04%2F21%2FBryce-Dallas-Howard_900x600.jpg&hash=f71832707f8af38fd8b74d1c1561f097dcb619f2)

Bryce looks great. And those mountains are bringing back memories from the first movie in a big way.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 23, 2014, 06:23:56 PM
Any idea who she's playing? The white outfit seems like a homage to Hammond.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Apr 23, 2014, 06:34:15 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Apr 23, 2014, 06:22:45 PM
http://insidemovies.ew.com/2014/04/23/jurassic-world-exclusive-photos/ (http://insidemovies.ew.com/2014/04/23/jurassic-world-exclusive-photos/)

First set pics, nothing crazy.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg2.timeinc.net%2Few%2Fi%2F2014%2F04%2F21%2FBryce-Dallas-Howard_900x600.jpg&hash=f71832707f8af38fd8b74d1c1561f097dcb619f2)

Bryce looks great. And those mountains are bringing back memories from the first movie in a big way.
Nice to see something official from this. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2014, 06:41:24 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg2.timeinc.net%2Few%2Fi%2F2014%2F04%2F21%2FDirector-Chair.jpg&hash=649087479af9ba541eef27b6c83d9b6ecf2f8bdb)

Anybody else besides me love this logo?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 23, 2014, 06:43:22 PM
I love it.

It's simple just like the original.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Apr 23, 2014, 06:50:09 PM
i love it too!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Apr 23, 2014, 06:55:15 PM
It's much better than the brushed steel design we've seen before
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 23, 2014, 06:58:30 PM
It's cool. But I miss the red.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 23, 2014, 06:59:26 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Apr 23, 2014, 06:58:30 PM
It's cool. But I miss the red.

That's what Bryce Dallas Howard is for.  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 23, 2014, 07:04:00 PM
Unf.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Apr 23, 2014, 07:05:43 PM
I hope a woman gets eaten for the first time in the series.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 23, 2014, 07:08:56 PM
Quote from: BANE on Apr 23, 2014, 07:05:43 PM
I hope a woman gets eaten for the first time in the series.

Me too.

Although...

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Frecreationandentertainment.files.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F05%2Fthe-lost-world-04.jpg&hash=f1cb251b2924fedc88486d113912e1ae27760f31)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Apr 23, 2014, 07:17:49 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 23, 2014, 07:08:56 PM
Quote from: BANE on Apr 23, 2014, 07:05:43 PM
I hope a woman gets eaten for the first time in the series.

Me too.

Although...

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Frecreationandentertainment.files.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F05%2Fthe-lost-world-04.jpg&hash=f1cb251b2924fedc88486d113912e1ae27760f31)
[close]

Spoiler
Girl survived in both the book and movie.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2014, 07:32:49 PM
Someone remind me. How many deaths in these films have their been due to someone being completely, utterly stupid? Off-hand, I can think of (maybe) one: long grass scene in TLW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 23, 2014, 07:34:45 PM
Burke and the snake. ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2014, 07:42:36 PM
I suppose. Then again, who wouldn't flip if a snake was crawling down their shirt, especially a venomous one?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 23, 2014, 07:43:41 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2014, 07:42:36 PM
I suppose. Then again, who wouldn't flip if a snake was crawling down their shirt, especially a venomous one?

Would you run straight into the jaws of a T-Rex?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Apr 23, 2014, 07:44:04 PM
I think Tyrannosaurus is a bit more frightening than small snake.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 23, 2014, 07:45:43 PM
Nobody died because of it, but shining a flashlight at a T. rex was pretty f**king stupid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Apr 23, 2014, 07:48:26 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2014, 07:32:49 PM
Someone remind me. How many deaths in these films have their been due to someone being completely, utterly stupid? Off-hand, I can think of (maybe) one: long grass scene in TLW.

Well, Nedry could have saved his own life had he been a little smarter.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 23, 2014, 07:49:52 PM
And Dieter has a horrible sense of direction.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2014, 07:50:59 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Apr 23, 2014, 07:43:41 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2014, 07:42:36 PM
I suppose. Then again, who wouldn't flip if a snake was crawling down their shirt, especially a venomous one?

Would you run straight into the jaws of a T-Rex?

Blame it on tunnel vision, but yes. Good point.

Quote from: Shasvre on Apr 23, 2014, 07:48:26 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2014, 07:32:49 PM
Someone remind me. How many deaths in these films have their been due to someone being completely, utterly stupid? Off-hand, I can think of (maybe) one: long grass scene in TLW.

Well, Nedry could have saved his own life had he been a little smarter.

Yes, another good one. I'm amazed he was so easy around the Dilo.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Apr 23, 2014, 07:52:31 PM
Also, while not exactly stupid, Muldoon got lured pretty easily by the raptors, I think. If only Grant and him would have had time for a chat.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2014, 07:54:48 PM
I'm referring to moments where you look at a character and say, "No! Don't go in there!". That type of thing. Does JP really have moments like that?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 23, 2014, 07:55:55 PM
I guess Mr. Arnold's death could count. Even if it is off screen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Apr 23, 2014, 07:56:55 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2014, 07:54:48 PM
I'm referring to moments where you look at a character and say, "No! Don't go in there!". That type of thing. Does JP really have moments like that?

Gennaro making a run for it when the T-Rex showed up?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 23, 2014, 07:57:54 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Apr 23, 2014, 07:55:55 PM
I guess Mr. Arnold's death could count. Even if it is off screen.

I maintain that Arnold survived and beat the raptor to death with his severed arm... motherf**ker.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 23, 2014, 07:58:37 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Apr 23, 2014, 07:56:55 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2014, 07:54:48 PM
I'm referring to moments where you look at a character and say, "No! Don't go in there!". That type of thing. Does JP really have moments like that?

Gennaro making a run for it when the T-Rex showed up?

I don't know. At that moment he was actually safer in the bathroom, than he was at the cars. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 23, 2014, 08:01:31 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Apr 23, 2014, 07:58:37 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Apr 23, 2014, 07:56:55 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2014, 07:54:48 PM
I'm referring to moments where you look at a character and say, "No! Don't go in there!". That type of thing. Does JP really have moments like that?

Gennaro making a run for it when the T-Rex showed up?

I don't know. At that moment he was actually safer in the bathroom, than he was at the cars. :laugh:

Yeah, he would have been fine if Malcolm hadn't led the rex right to him.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 23, 2014, 08:03:54 PM
MY FREAKIN NUTS!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 23, 2014, 08:15:54 PM
What about Milburn?

What an idiot!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Apr 23, 2014, 08:17:46 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Apr 23, 2014, 07:58:37 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Apr 23, 2014, 07:56:55 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2014, 07:54:48 PM
I'm referring to moments where you look at a character and say, "No! Don't go in there!". That type of thing. Does JP really have moments like that?

Gennaro making a run for it when the T-Rex showed up?

I don't know. At that moment he was actually safer in the bathroom, than he was at the cars. :laugh:

I bet he would have stopped the kids from waving that flashlight around though, and they would all have been fine. Thing is, the moment you saw him run for the shitter, you know he was done for.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2014, 08:35:48 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 23, 2014, 08:15:54 PM
What about Milburn?

What an idiot!

What does he have to do with anything?

Quote from: Shasvre on Apr 23, 2014, 08:17:46 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Apr 23, 2014, 07:58:37 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Apr 23, 2014, 07:56:55 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2014, 07:54:48 PM
I'm referring to moments where you look at a character and say, "No! Don't go in there!". That type of thing. Does JP really have moments like that?

Gennaro making a run for it when the T-Rex showed up?

I don't know. At that moment he was actually safer in the bathroom, than he was at the cars. :laugh:

I bet he would have stopped the kids from waving that flashlight around though, and they would all have been fine. Thing is, the moment you saw him run for the shitter, you know he was done for.

Yeah, his whole purpose in the film was to die. That's the closest example we have I think.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 23, 2014, 09:39:43 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2014, 07:54:48 PM
I'm referring to moments where you look at a character and say, "No! Don't go in there!". That type of thing. Does JP really have moments like that?

Definitely Dieter. He'd have been safer peeing on his teammates...

I guess you could bring up the maintenance shed in JP1, both in the film and book, but they actually needed to go in there. I suppose it might have helped if they'd gone in together rather than one at a time...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 23, 2014, 09:51:50 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Apr 23, 2014, 09:39:43 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2014, 07:54:48 PM
I'm referring to moments where you look at a character and say, "No! Don't go in there!". That type of thing. Does JP really have moments like that?

Definitely Dieter. He'd have been safer peeing on his teammates...



And he couldn't just step behind a tree and piss, he had to wander off.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2014, 10:07:50 PM
Good one. Who goes that far out to urinate?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Apr 24, 2014, 03:00:18 AM
Lately I've been looking to pick up a copy of the Jurassic Park Trilogy on Blu-Ray.  Can someone help me out?  What exactly is the difference (if any) between

http://www.amazon.com/Jurassic-Park-Trilogy-Import-Blu-ray/dp/B00EF44A2Q/ref=tmm_blu_title_0?ie=UTF8&qid=1398301059&sr=1-1 (http://www.amazon.com/Jurassic-Park-Trilogy-Import-Blu-ray/dp/B00EF44A2Q/ref=tmm_blu_title_0?ie=UTF8&qid=1398301059&sr=1-1)

and

http://www.amazon.com/Jurassic-Ultimate-Trilogy-Blu-ray-Import/dp/B004KKXMSI (http://www.amazon.com/Jurassic-Ultimate-Trilogy-Blu-ray-Import/dp/B004KKXMSI)

(I don't know how region stuff works, but I'm from the US, if it matters)

Also, do the sets I linked to include all the special features?  I know the multi-format $47 trilogy has hours of bonus features, but I'm not sure if the strictly Blu-Ray sets do, since both I linked to are about 20 dollars cheaper.  I'm a sucker for special features/behind the scenes stuff and I don't want to accidentally order a set that doesn't include the documentaries and such.

Thanks very much, in advance!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 24, 2014, 03:10:19 AM
They're exactly the same and yes, they feature all the extras.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Apr 24, 2014, 03:21:55 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2014, 11:24:33 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 23, 2014, 01:08:37 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 22, 2014, 02:37:09 PM
You know what? It's funny you mention that because I was thinking of doing just that, not quite like yours but rather, individual videos highlighting certain toys and such. The only problem is that I don't have a professional-grade camera. My webcam obviously isn't portable and while there is the camera on my phone, I feel like people wouldn't want to watch a video that's shaped like a small, vertical rectangle :P

Besides, what are you jealous for? I'm sure you have most of the same stuff, haha.
I should break out all my JP stuff and snap some pics. I've got near-complete collections of JP and TLW toys, and a bunch of JP3 stuff (and other odds and ends).

What sort of condition are they in?
Generally pretty good, nothing broken, no missing accessories unless I bought them second-hand and they didn't come with accessories at that point to begin with.

No I'm not selling any of them, if that's where you're going with this. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Apr 24, 2014, 03:41:41 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 24, 2014, 03:10:19 AM
They're exactly the same and yes, they feature all the extras.

Thanks a lot Doom!

Ordered and cannot wait for it to arrive.  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Apr 24, 2014, 03:57:50 AM
Quote from: MrSpaceJockey on Apr 24, 2014, 03:41:41 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 24, 2014, 03:10:19 AM
They're exactly the same and yes, they feature all the extras.

Thanks a lot Doom!

Ordered and cannot wait for it to arrive.  8)
I got this version of the JP Trilogy on bluray, I much prefer it to the regular set:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FSuhtfNV.jpg&hash=a3d1f55b83c8141fd1e3486f9603e89b49471ab0) (http://imgur.com/SuhtfNV)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fbmby2eR.jpg&hash=e692735636092f608ba752faa5609535f1dfc0b2) (http://imgur.com/bmby2eR)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Apr 24, 2014, 04:49:00 AM
That is sleek.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 24, 2014, 08:20:08 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2014, 08:35:48 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 23, 2014, 08:15:54 PM
What about Milburn?

What an idiot!

What does he have to do with anything?

Nothing.

I was just joshing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Apr 24, 2014, 11:06:32 AM
HYPE HYPE HYPE

insidemovies.ew.com/2014/04/23/jurassic-world-exclusive-photos/

Here's the Entertainment Weekly link. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 24, 2014, 11:09:55 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 24, 2014, 03:21:55 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2014, 11:24:33 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 23, 2014, 01:08:37 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 22, 2014, 02:37:09 PM
You know what? It's funny you mention that because I was thinking of doing just that, not quite like yours but rather, individual videos highlighting certain toys and such. The only problem is that I don't have a professional-grade camera. My webcam obviously isn't portable and while there is the camera on my phone, I feel like people wouldn't want to watch a video that's shaped like a small, vertical rectangle :P

Besides, what are you jealous for? I'm sure you have most of the same stuff, haha.
I should break out all my JP stuff and snap some pics. I've got near-complete collections of JP and TLW toys, and a bunch of JP3 stuff (and other odds and ends).

What sort of condition are they in?
Generally pretty good, nothing broken, no missing accessories unless I bought them second-hand and they didn't come with accessories at that point to begin with.

No I'm not selling any of them, if that's where you're going with this. :P

Please, I only deal with professionals anyway ;)

Quote from: MrSpaceJockey on Apr 24, 2014, 03:41:41 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 24, 2014, 03:10:19 AM
They're exactly the same and yes, they feature all the extras.

Thanks a lot Doom!

Ordered and cannot wait for it to arrive.  8)

You're welcome! These films do look rather spectacular in HD.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Apr 24, 2014, 01:41:04 PM
QuotePlease, I only deal with professionals anyway ;)
I'm not taking offense or anything and I know you're joking and stuff, but I have no idea what that means.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 24, 2014, 01:44:03 PM
You're not a professional collector....?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Apr 24, 2014, 01:50:42 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Apr 24, 2014, 01:44:03 PM
You're not a professional collector....?
Yeah I'm not even sure what that would mean, though. :P

I collect stuff, but I don't do it for a living I guess?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 24, 2014, 01:55:31 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 24, 2014, 01:41:04 PM
QuotePlease, I only deal with professionals anyway ;)
I'm not taking offense or anything and I know you're joking and stuff, but I have no idea what that means.

Professional collectors, like these guys:
http://stores.ebay.ca/Stephaniezrncic95s-Store?_rdc=1 (http://stores.ebay.ca/Stephaniezrncic95s-Store?_rdc=1)

And a video of them in action:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YN8uAQvnUjg# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YN8uAQvnUjg#)

I don't know that they do it for a living but as you can tell, they're professionals in the sense that they take it very seriously and only sell top quality stuff.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 24, 2014, 01:57:00 PM
I remember this guy by the name of Razzie had the largest Jurassic Park collection I've ever seen. I ENVIED him.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 24, 2014, 02:00:42 PM
Where did you see his collection?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 24, 2014, 02:03:30 PM
Long time ago on various JP fan bases.  I believe there's a link to his page on JP Legacy.

EDIT:  Apparently his site is shut down?

http://www.jplegacy.org/board/showthread.php?p=541522 (http://www.jplegacy.org/board/showthread.php?p=541522)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 24, 2014, 04:36:39 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 24, 2014, 01:57:00 PM
I remember this guy by the name of Razzie had the largest Jurassic Park collection I've ever seen. I ENVIED him.

Hmm back in '05 there was an admin by that name  in a forum called Welcome to JP. It might have been a girl though. She had one hell of a collection as well. Hmmm.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Apr 24, 2014, 04:37:36 PM
Man, the overreaction's to every little bit of news at JPlegacy is gross.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 24, 2014, 05:25:12 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Apr 24, 2014, 04:37:36 PM
Man, the overreaction's to every little bit of news at JPlegacy is gross.

Lol well a fourth installment has been in question for more than a decade so it's a bit understandable.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 24, 2014, 05:28:58 PM
Trevorrow said the first Jurassic Park film was pretty funny.... so now fanboys at jplegacy think the new film is gonna be some sort of screwball comedy and that it'll be SHIT because it wont be as "dramatic!" as the first film....

lol.

Anyway there was a plot summary leaked on reddit... so take it with a grain of salt:
Spoiler
There are new velociraptors, genetically engineered to be faster, bigger and stronger... and a Carnotaurus that is larger than the T-Rex... Both engineered to be new "attractions" at the park and to draw in larger crowds and more $...
[close]

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 24, 2014, 05:36:58 PM
If that's the honest plot, I'm going to scream bloody murder.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 24, 2014, 05:39:47 PM
the leaked reddit summary does fit in with Trevorrow's comments about
Spoiler
the new dinosaurs being a result of man's "hubris, curiosity and a need to entertain."
[close]

So yeah, it's apparently real.

But why is it so bad? :P This actually feels like a natural plot for a story about a new theme park built to entertain millions of people.... :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 24, 2014, 05:40:17 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Apr 24, 2014, 04:37:36 PM
Man, the overreaction's to every little bit of news at JPlegacy is gross.

That site is a swamp of sadness.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 24, 2014, 05:36:58 PM
If that's the honest plot, I'm going to scream bloody murder.

Trevorrow and crew are smarter than that. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 24, 2014, 05:41:01 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 24, 2014, 05:40:17 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 24, 2014, 05:36:58 PM
If that's the honest plot, I'm going to scream bloody murder.

Trevorrow and crew are smarter than that. ;)

I hope so. Forgive me if I seem cynical but after the human/dino hybrid angle...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 24, 2014, 05:41:55 PM
..there were never any human dino hybrids.... in any script.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 24, 2014, 05:42:40 PM
...which was scrapped and laughed at.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 24, 2014, 05:47:46 PM
mostly by people who didnt bother to read it and didnt realize it was an early draft... because they are "true JP fans!" or some dumb shit like that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 24, 2014, 05:52:06 PM
You know me inside and out. :-*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Apr 24, 2014, 05:57:28 PM
That Reddit script didn't feature Wu, who we know is a major player. It was just a guy making up his own script based off of Set pics and rumors.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 24, 2014, 06:01:44 PM
^ah! Good to know. 

I still hope we see Carnotaurus... because... c'mon. That guy has been ignored for way too long. :P

I suspect the reddit fake script is right about a few things, though... Trevorrow's latest comments seem to hint at that. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Apr 24, 2014, 06:05:29 PM
Considering how it ended, I really doubt it is  ;D

And yeah, Carnotaurus is at the top of my wishlist. Especially if they include his camo from the novel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 24, 2014, 06:06:53 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Apr 24, 2014, 06:05:29 PM
Considering how it ended, I really doubt it is  ;D

And yeah, Carnotaurus is at the top of my wishlist. Especially if they include his camo from the novel.

UNF
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 24, 2014, 06:07:07 PM
lol do you have a link to it? Did it end in a really silly over the top way? :laugh:

Anyway.. i received my Revoltech Lost World T-rex yesterday....
this is a great little figure... :P
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm3.static.flickr.com%2F2505%2F4348650874_57fcf405d1.jpg&hash=8417fe59f124db335cc0b29ab9ac499f41702234)

^ The trees arrive separated from the diorama and it's usually hard to stick them into the slots.. this is the only common problem with the figure... the easy way to do that is just to give the trees and the diorama a "bath" in hot water before trying to place the trees.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 24, 2014, 06:18:09 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 24, 2014, 05:47:46 PM
mostly by people who didnt bother to read it and didnt realize it was an early draft... because they are "true JP fans!" or some dumb shit like that.

It was still a dumb idea, to say the least.

I'd love to see Carnotaurus in this film. As ridiculous as the chameleon aspect is, I think it would look great on-screen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Apr 24, 2014, 06:18:38 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 24, 2014, 06:07:07 PM
lol do you have a link to it? Did it end in a really silly over the top way? :laugh:

Anyway.. i received my Revoltech Lost World T-rex yesterday....
this is a great little figure... :P
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2505/4348650874_57fcf405d1.jpg

^ The trees arrive separated from the diorama and it's usually hard to stick them into the slots.. this is the only common problem with the figure... the easy way to do that is just to give the trees and the diorama a "bath" in hot water before trying to place the trees.

I'm pretty sure the post on reddit is gone now, but I'll check. I guess i'll spoiler tag, just in case.

Spoiler
Omar Sy and BD Wong aren't featured. The main characters escape the island via helicopter, after Irrfan Kahn's character distracts the Carnotaur. The military, the US if I remember correctly, NUKE THE ISLAND. Everything is destroyed in the Nuclear fire, but the camera pans down and reveals the fin of an aquatic reptile that survived the blast. Cue credits.
[close]

If they're setting up a trilogy, that's not how you end your movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 24, 2014, 06:32:47 PM
thanks for the info. that's an EPIC SILLY ENDING. X)  :laugh: In the first book they napalm nublar to hell.. but in that fan script, dinosaurs are so dangerous that the army has to NUKE THEM? lolz.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 24, 2014, 06:18:09 PM
It was still a dumb idea, to say the least.

The script played the concept for full on FUN ACTIONZ... but it still introduced some nice little themes about the horrible ways animals are used in warfare and animal abuse in general... (think attack dogs used in seal combat operations). It wasnt a full on hack job like Jurassic park 3.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 24, 2014, 06:36:23 PM
Even JP 3 was better than that tripe. JP 3's story wasn't the problem. It was just boring and had nothing new to offer aside from the Spinosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 24, 2014, 06:37:16 PM
jp3 had a story? :P And it wasnt the problem? What? :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 24, 2014, 06:42:13 PM
I should've been clearer. It was a decent setup. But it didn't have a stupid angle like the hybrid thing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Apr 24, 2014, 06:44:36 PM
Didn't help that Jp3's script was ditched 4 weeks before shooting.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 24, 2014, 06:45:44 PM
Really? I never knew that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 24, 2014, 07:11:00 PM
The original script was about two planes owned by a rich family.

The adults were in one plane and the kids in another. The plane with the children crashes on the island and the adults pull together to rescue them.

It also featured Grant and Malcolm.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 24, 2014, 07:22:48 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 24, 2014, 05:28:58 PM
Trevorrow said the first Jurassic Park film was pretty funny.... so now fanboys at jplegacy think the new film is gonna be some sort of screwball comedy and that it'll be SHIT because it wont be as "dramatic!" as the first film....

lol.

Anyway there was a plot summary leaked on reddit... so take it with a grain of salt:
Spoiler
There are new velociraptors, genetically engineered to be faster, bigger and stronger... and a Carnotaurus that is larger than the T-Rex... Both engineered to be new "attractions" at the park and to draw in larger crowds and more $...
[close]

Wut...

T-Rex betta whoop hiz azz doe.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 24, 2014, 07:28:33 PM
^ It was a fan script doe. Relax.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 24, 2014, 06:42:13 PMBut it didn't have a stupid angle like the hybrid thing.

...there were no hybrids. :P The animals had some select genes from dogs and humans... that's not actual hybridization... nor is it crossbreeding.  The dinos in the original films had frog dna... they werent crossbred frog-dino hybrids. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 24, 2014, 07:49:17 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 24, 2014, 07:28:33 PM
^ It was a fan script doe. Relax.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 24, 2014, 06:42:13 PMBut it didn't have a stupid angle like the hybrid thing.

...there were no hybrids. :P The animals had some select genes from dogs and humans... that's not actual hybridization... nor is it crossbreeding.  The dinos in the original films had frog dna... they werent crossbred frog-dino hybrids. :P

I think he's referring to the human/dino hybrid fiasco. Or was all that fake too?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 24, 2014, 07:56:53 PM
we are discussing the john sayles JP4 script. Wich isnt fake.

The human/dino hybrid discussions started due to a concept artist taking that script's ideas way too literally and actually making the new dinosaurs look slightly human.....  wich would be fine for a random frankenstein-ish monster movie.. but not really jurassic park. :P

but in the script itself, the dinosaurs with extra dna were meant to look like normal dinosaurs.. a bit stronger and smarter... but not monsters. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 24, 2014, 08:23:27 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 24, 2014, 07:56:53 PM
we are discussing the john sayles JP4 script. Wich isnt fake.

The human/dino hybrid discussions started due to a concept artist taking that script's ideas way too literally and actually making the new dinosaurs look slightly human.....  wich would be fine for a random frankenstein-ish monster movie.. but not really jurassic park. :P

but in the script itself, the dinosaurs with extra dna were meant to look like normal dinosaurs.. a bit stronger and smarter... but not monsters. :P

Ah ok thought it was from that case.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Apr 24, 2014, 08:44:16 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 24, 2014, 05:28:58 PM
Trevorrow said the first Jurassic Park film was pretty funny.... so now fanboys at jplegacy think the new film is gonna be some sort of screwball comedy and that it'll be SHIT because it wont be as "dramatic!" as the first film....

lol.


I keep going back. I don't know why I do, but I can't stop myself. Then I read about people freaking out because Chris Pratt is the kind of guy you can have a few beers with and it makes me want to stick a fork in my eye.

The Sayles script was a fun read because it was just so random. It's like, this dudes getting chased through the jungle by Excavator Raptors, but wait now he's shooting Dilophosaurs in the face! Oh no a Mosasaur just pulled that plane into the water and then conveniently disappeared! Where did it come from? Where did it go? Who cares! Now we're in the Swiss Alps training Raptors how to fetch.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 24, 2014, 08:49:27 PM
haha yuss the randomness of that script was quite fun... AND there was the hippy pilot that acted like he had come out of the big lebowski. X) Baron Von Drax acted like he came out of a bond film. (The villain in Moonraker is Hugo Drax.. so it's definitely intentional.)

It was all very silly.. but a lot of fun.

Nick Harris from that script > Any character from the 3rd film... and most from the second. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Apr 24, 2014, 09:26:24 PM
I enjoy The Lost World despite it's flaws. Lately when  I watch it I turn it off after the Raptor scene. I like Malcolm being colder and more sarcastic since the Nublar incident, It makes sense considering he almost died. The banter between Malcolm and the other characters, namely Eddie and Sarah, is really well written. I really like the look of the film too. The reliance on silhouettes and shadow makes things feel more threatening and mysterious.

My main problem is with the jumps in tone. The first movie handled the jumps from humor to terror perfectly. TLW feels more erratic. Sarah, Ian and Nick cracking jokes while Eddie is trying to save them felt weird. Sarah being stupid enough to carry around a jacket covered in infant Rex blood was out of character. And oh god that gymnastic kick.

But for what it's worth, I can still really enjoy the film. The stegosaurs, hunter chase, hunter camp, trailer/eddie scene, dieter/compy scene, Trex camp/chase, tallgrass, and village raptor scene are all really well done actions scenes. They're just peppered with occasionally stupid moments that pull you out of the film. Actually listing all those scenes makes me appreciate the movie more.

Also, Roland Tembo > Nick Harris
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 24, 2014, 09:33:00 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Apr 24, 2014, 09:26:24 PM
Also, Roland Tembo > Nick Harris

True.. but then again.. Roland Tembo > Everyone else in the trilogy.  :laugh:

It's been a while since i've seen The Lost World... :P Roland Tembo was the best character in that film. criminally underused.
The stuff in San Diego was just handled poorly... ex: how did the Rex eat the crewmembers aboard the ship? Whaaaaa....

Gonna give the trilogy a rewatch during the weekend... pretty sure i'm gonna be depressed by the progressive fall in quality...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Apr 24, 2014, 09:35:20 PM
I usually draw or something while watching TLW. That way I can enjoy the dialogue, action and soundtrack but ignore the lame things. Can't believe I forgot to mention the soundtrack. So good
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 24, 2014, 10:10:44 PM
The Lost World is fantastic.

Spoiler
Including the San Diego climax.
Spoiler
Not including the gymnastic scene.
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 24, 2014, 10:14:03 PM
a fantastic piece of shit 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 24, 2014, 10:17:45 PM
Yeah, you're right. Jurassic Park III certainly is.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Apr 24, 2014, 10:27:08 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Apr 24, 2014, 10:14:03 PM
a fantastic piece of shit

I pray the upcoming Godzilla is full of plot holes, terrible dialogue and Godzilla is defeated by the tears of homeless children

Spoiler
I'm lying  hope it's good  :-\
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 24, 2014, 10:29:28 PM
damn right u do


just forget about the Jurassic world stuff. Godzilla is all u need.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 24, 2014, 10:36:13 PM
I win because I love both. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Apr 24, 2014, 10:39:07 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Apr 24, 2014, 10:29:28 PM
damn right u do


just forget about the Jurassic world stuff. Godzilla is all u need.

Get Chris Pratt into the next Godzilla movie and that might be true.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 24, 2014, 10:40:20 PM
who
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Apr 24, 2014, 10:43:02 PM
You need to get educated

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg2.timeinc.net%2Fpeople%2Fi%2F2013%2Fnews%2F130722%2Fchris-pratt-2-300.jpg&hash=b998f46e46b010f5f0d1cfc0abb5135f40576348)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Apr 24, 2014, 11:49:51 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Apr 24, 2014, 10:29:28 PM
damn right u do


just forget about the Jurassic world stuff. Godzilla is all u need.
Haha everyone who watched the Godzilla trailers and heard that roar knew that it was simply a poor man's T-Rex roar.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Apr 25, 2014, 12:45:50 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 24, 2014, 01:55:31 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 24, 2014, 01:41:04 PM
QuotePlease, I only deal with professionals anyway ;)
I'm not taking offense or anything and I know you're joking and stuff, but I have no idea what that means.

Professional collectors, like these guys:
http://stores.ebay.ca/Stephaniezrncic95s-Store?_rdc=1 (http://stores.ebay.ca/Stephaniezrncic95s-Store?_rdc=1)

And a video of them in action:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YN8uAQvnUjg# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YN8uAQvnUjg#)

I don't know that they do it for a living but as you can tell, they're professionals in the sense that they take it very seriously and only sell top quality stuff.


Well sure, but I don't collect to resell, I guess.
Shit, the vast majority of my JP stuff was bought in 1992 and 1997 when it was new on the shelves and I was a kid. I bought them to play with them (and you'd better believe I did), it just so happens that I kept all of it. :P

Quote from: Remonster on Apr 24, 2014, 06:05:29 PM
Considering how it ended, I really doubt it is  ;D

And yeah, Carnotaurus is at the top of my wishlist. Especially if they include his camo from the novel.
Seconding this.

Carnotaurus best taurus

The camo Carnotaurus did have a pretty sweet cameo (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJHjPIAMfM4) in the Lost World lightgun game, though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 25, 2014, 04:03:36 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Apr 24, 2014, 10:29:28 PM
damn right u do


just forget about the Jurassic world stuff. Godzilla is all u need.

Aspie's face when Godzilla climaxes with it getting eaten by a group of T-Rex

(https://31.media.tumblr.com/8e8856c3b50265fcef96154c8ed30290/tumblr_n4in1qgn941sjla0qo3_250.gif)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Circadian on Apr 25, 2014, 04:51:59 AM
Looking forward to this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 25, 2014, 11:35:50 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Apr 24, 2014, 10:29:28 PM
damn right u do


just forget about the Jurassic world stuff. Godzilla is all u need.

just forget yer face
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 25, 2014, 05:32:12 PM
My JP podcast now has T-shirts if you guys fancy one 8)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BmFXy7GIYAEBlfl.jpg:large)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 25, 2014, 06:44:16 PM
Love the banner!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 26, 2014, 12:13:44 AM
My shirt just came in the mail  8) ;D

(https://scontent-b-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/t31.0-8/10295183_634643859949660_9184871568759997470_o.jpg)

Easily my favorite shirt. Both of my favorite franchises in one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Apr 26, 2014, 01:13:06 AM
I got that shirt too, it's pretty awesome :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 26, 2014, 01:39:40 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 26, 2014, 01:13:06 AM
I got that shirt too, it's pretty awesome :D

I lahve it
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 26, 2014, 02:35:13 AM
From the set...

Spoiler
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BmGjjWTIgAEmvfM.jpg)
(https://scontent-b-lax.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc1/t1.0-9/10258492_731519636892550_7595399924417433437_n.jpg)
[close]

ACU = Animal Control Unit? :P Sweet helicopter.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 26, 2014, 02:39:37 AM
Dem mountains
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 26, 2014, 04:06:17 AM
Those are gowgeous.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Apr 26, 2014, 05:32:57 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 26, 2014, 02:35:13 AM
From the set...

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BmGjjWTIgAEmvfM.jpg
(https://scontent-b-lax.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc1/t1.0-9/10258492_731519636892550_7595399924417433437_n.jpg)

ACU = Animal Control Unit? :P Sweet helicopter.
God these things are going to look great getting all torn up and totaled by dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 26, 2014, 05:34:15 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 26, 2014, 02:35:13 AM
From the set...

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BmGjjWTIgAEmvfM.jpg
(https://scontent-b-lax.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc1/t1.0-9/10258492_731519636892550_7595399924417433437_n.jpg)

ACU = Animal Control Unit

? :P Sweet helicopter.

Wow, kevlar. They're really upping the ante here.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 26, 2014, 05:34:58 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 26, 2014, 05:34:15 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 26, 2014, 02:35:13 AM
From the set...

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BmGjjWTIgAEmvfM.jpg
(https://scontent-b-lax.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc1/t1.0-9/10258492_731519636892550_7595399924417433437_n.jpg)

ACU = Animal Control Unit

? :P Sweet helicopter.

Wow, kevlar. They're really upping the ante here.

Spared no expense.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 26, 2014, 05:43:24 PM
shotovercamera
3 days ago
Another sick shot from Hawaii! Shotover K1 in Oahu shooting Jurassic World. Very 1st shot required look down/pan. Thank goodness for the Shotover 6 axis

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdistilleryimage2.ak.instagram.com%2Ff31429bacb3611e3b8860002c954d92e_8.jpg&hash=7d125dec8dd14575530f179a1b6e8694474f1f33)

more good stuff here

https://www.facebook.com/ReelToursHawaii (https://www.facebook.com/ReelToursHawaii)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 27, 2014, 03:20:12 AM
Fan rendition of that comiccon teaser screened?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6t8PXC6F-s#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6t8PXC6F-s#ws)

(https://scontent-a-sea.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/t1.0-9/1794517_10152026933946615_5419487607570749047_n.jpg)

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/t1.0-9/1969391_482729305188299_5973558518524405038_n.jpg)


Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 27, 2014, 03:29:41 AM
Something about the blue logo with the classic, spine-tingling soundtrack playing just seems off to me... :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 27, 2014, 03:31:36 AM
eeewww
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DJ Pu$$yface on Apr 27, 2014, 03:40:04 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Apr 27, 2014, 03:31:36 AM
eeewww

aaaaaaand here we go
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 27, 2014, 03:59:01 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 27, 2014, 03:29:41 AM
Something about the blue logo with the classic, spine-tingling soundtrack playing just seems off to me... :-\

I have no problem with it at all. I did expect some variation of the classic themes though. I expect the first trailer to be kind of cheerful for it's first half, showing the wonders of the park, and turning into the regular themes for the second half.

Well that's how I see it in my mind.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 27, 2014, 04:03:23 AM
I imagine whatever new corporation is running the park would want to avoid the red logos of the previous disastrous iteration... red logos remind one of the bloodshed that happened all those years ago....

Business decision. :P It looks good anyway.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 27, 2014, 04:04:01 AM
And blue is a calming color, after all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Apr 27, 2014, 04:04:23 AM
That Mosasaur pic looks cool.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 27, 2014, 04:05:35 AM
Quote from: Godzillakuj94 on Apr 27, 2014, 04:04:23 AM
That Mosasaur pic looks cool.

It looks like a komodo dragon with flippers. On one hand, it's a bit silly. On the other, komodo dragons are f**king awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 27, 2014, 04:07:35 AM
...the forum could use more Metaru Gearu avatars and sigs....  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 27, 2014, 04:08:23 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 27, 2014, 04:07:35 AM
...the forum could use more Metaru Gearu avatars and sigs....  :laugh:

I'll cook up a serious one eventually. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Apr 27, 2014, 04:29:38 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Apr 27, 2014, 04:05:35 AM
Quote from: Godzillakuj94 on Apr 27, 2014, 04:04:23 AM
That Mosasaur pic looks cool.

It looks like a komodo dragon with flippers. On one hand, it's a bit silly. On the other, komodo dragons are f**king awesome.
Well they are related...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Apr 27, 2014, 04:35:31 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 27, 2014, 04:07:35 AM
...the forum could use more Metaru Gearu avatars and sigs....  :laugh:
yes
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 27, 2014, 09:34:55 PM
I fully understand that those set pics don't reveal anything majorly spoilerish but it would be nice if you guys posted those kinds of photos under a spoiler tag.

I was unaware of those helicopters and buggies etc, until I was reading through this thread.

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fp.vitalmx.com%2Fphotos%2Fforums%2F2013%2F04%2F11%2Fpicard_make_it_so_1_109599.jpg&hash=cc23f2e98682c9be7a7e2422038f291a386a993b)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 27, 2014, 10:24:45 PM
only if you call me number one.  :-*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 27, 2014, 10:28:32 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 27, 2014, 10:24:45 PM
only if you call me number one.  :-*

Done if I'm Captain of the JP thread.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 27, 2014, 10:32:05 PM
Quoteyou're the captain and they look up to you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JiKwAS1qaCk# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JiKwAS1qaCk#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 27, 2014, 10:38:25 PM
Commander Blacklabel, Jurassic World non-spoiler thread...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fyodaismybackpack.files.wordpress.com%2F2013%2F02%2Fengage.gif&hash=e57d55cc6b7a83c4bffd01c1205e07c386b1eaad)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 27, 2014, 10:42:35 PM
Engaged.

I'll be sure to place spoiler tags on the set images that show armored dinosaurs killing colombian drug lords. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 27, 2014, 10:48:12 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmetaversemodsquad.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F06%2Fpicard-facepalm2.jpg&hash=f583d50ecd90741f36377c2bd4c77e5b2eb6f23b)

Spoiler
Welcome everyone reading this, you're now back in the year 2007. Where Picard face palm memes were all the rage. Coming up: the Tyrannosaur paddock.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Apr 27, 2014, 10:56:29 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 27, 2014, 09:34:55 PM
I fully understand that those set pics don't reveal anything majorly spoilerish but it would be nice if you guys posted those kinds of photos under a spoiler tag.

I was unaware of those helicopters and buggies etc, until I was reading through this thread.

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fp.vitalmx.com%2Fphotos%2Fforums%2F2013%2F04%2F11%2Fpicard_make_it_so_1_109599.jpg&hash=cc23f2e98682c9be7a7e2422038f291a386a993b)
[close]
Helicopters and jeeps in a JP film are now spoilers?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fclearancebinreview.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F01%2F01-12-13_bq_2_mib_alien_crisis_screen_ancient_aliens_guy.jpg&hash=6d0c47daf33da0f1ebbc6d0510f777d0c80d3baa)

You know the film has

Spoiler
Dinosaurs
[close]

in it too, right? And

Spoiler
people
Spoiler
:o
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 27, 2014, 11:04:24 PM
Quote from: RagingDragon on Apr 27, 2014, 10:56:29 PM
Helicopters and jeeps in a JP film are now spoilers?

Design and logos, company names, anything could potentially turn up plastered all over a vehicle in JW which I'd rather wait to see/hear about in the final film. I'm sure I'm not the only one.

Spoiler
Jurassic Park 3 had no helicopters or jeeps ;)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Apr 27, 2014, 11:15:27 PM
Nothing you wouldn't see in the first trailer anyway.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 27, 2014, 11:16:40 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 27, 2014, 11:04:24 PM
Spoiler
Jurassic Park 3 had no helicopters or jeeps ;)
[close]

It was shit.  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 27, 2014, 11:19:22 PM
But that will be designed to reveal just what Universal wants us to see.
Rather than some blurry fan photo from the set.

I'm not watching the trailers except the teaser, when it's released, and I'm sure that won't give away too much.

I've done it with Godzilla and I have no idea what to expect. It's much more thrilling.

You should try it some time :-*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Apr 27, 2014, 11:21:12 PM
 :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Apr 27, 2014, 11:21:40 PM
I don't know if my fragile mind could handle it, A3 :laugh: Prometheus broke the disappointment meter, and never again. It was like being culturally roofied. :P

But good on you. I'll keep it in mind with anything spoilery.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 27, 2014, 11:24:25 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ctrlaltgeek.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F12%2FStar-Trek-happy-Picard-530x298.jpg&hash=85bd8785f1b6596d12547074300f6fdd066b92c4)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 28, 2014, 12:40:51 AM
Amen!

It's gonna be hard to handle with over a year left.  That Reel Tours Hawaii FB account is pretty silly with all the unecessary info the guy tries to get his hands on.  Can't blame him for being a hardcore JP fan!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 28, 2014, 12:44:26 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 27, 2014, 11:04:24 PM
Quote from: RagingDragon on Apr 27, 2014, 10:56:29 PM
Helicopters and jeeps in a JP film are now spoilers?

Design and logos, company names, anything could potentially turn up plastered all over a vehicle in JW which I'd rather wait to see/hear about in the final film. I'm sure I'm not the only one.

Spoiler
Jurassic Park 3 had no helicopters or jeeps ;)
[close]

Yeah I'm with ya, kinda. I'm just making it my own responsibility to avoid all the images and this thread as much as possible. I like to go as blind as possible too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Apr 28, 2014, 12:59:43 AM
I just don't know about having my hopes so high after 3. It could go the way of the Terminator. :(

I'm not expecting them to pull off a miracle, honestly. I hope I'm wrong and we get something on par with JP 1, but that's some serious optimism lmao.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 28, 2014, 01:09:04 AM
I'm not expecting anything on par with JP1. That would just be setting myself up for disappointment.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 28, 2014, 01:19:30 AM
Quote from: RagingDragon on Apr 28, 2014, 12:59:43 AM
I just don't know about having my hopes so high after 3. It could go the way of the Terminator. :(

I'm not expecting them to pull off a miracle, honestly. I hope I'm wrong and we get something on par with JP 1, but that's some serious optimism lmao.

Even if it sucks I still want to go in blind. Even if JP3 wasn't that good, I was fascinated by it when I was younger. So it's not related to our expectations, but about wanting to see our beloved franchise with as much surprises as possible.

I will probably only see the first teaser as well, and hold myself from seeing the rest until I'm actually there. Will be exciting :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Apr 28, 2014, 03:02:21 AM
God DAMN that Blu-Ray was incredible.  I only got to skim parts of the first film but what I've seen was just amazing.  Highly anticipating the free-time I'll get to go through this whole set.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 28, 2014, 09:05:06 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Apr 28, 2014, 01:09:04 AM
I'm not expecting anything on par with JP1. That would just be setting myself up for disappointment.

Exactly.

If it's better than 3 that's a winner in my books.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: worldpeace on Apr 28, 2014, 09:11:12 AM
yes
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 28, 2014, 10:52:22 AM
Enjoy JP nerds!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_WpsDOXtGQ (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_WpsDOXtGQ)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 28, 2014, 12:49:08 PM
Just to be clear: did they release a new transfer of JP on Blu-ray?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 28, 2014, 01:00:34 PM
Not that I am aware of. They released all three movies seperately though. What's wrong with the current transfer? Seems pretty solid to me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 28, 2014, 01:01:38 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 27, 2014, 11:19:22 PM
But that will be designed to reveal just what Universal wants us to see.
Rather than some blurry fan photo from the set.

I'm not watching the trailers except the teaser, when it's released, and I'm sure that won't give away too much.

I've done it with Godzilla and I have no idea what to expect. It's much more thrilling.

You should try it some time :-*

What's there to spoil about Godzilla? If you don't know the basic story, then you've been living under a rock. We've known about it since 1954 :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 28, 2014, 01:05:49 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Apr 28, 2014, 01:00:34 PM
Not that I am aware of. They released all three movies seperately though. What's wrong with the current transfer? Seems pretty solid to me.
I heard there was a new transfer released recently. Buh.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 28, 2014, 02:36:32 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 28, 2014, 10:52:22 AM
Enjoy JP nerds!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_WpsDOXtGQ (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_WpsDOXtGQ)

Thanks for the wonderful birthday gift!

I finally got to listen to it in its entirety, and it's truly well done  :)

Btw, how the hell did you guys get Richard Attenborough to narrate it - and have you pointed this towards Spielberg, Trevorrow, etc?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 28, 2014, 04:31:07 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 28, 2014, 01:01:38 PM
What's there to spoil about Godzilla? If you don't know the basic story, then you've been living under a rock. We've known about it since 1954 :P

A lot and you know it. :-*

Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 28, 2014, 02:36:32 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 28, 2014, 10:52:22 AM
Enjoy JP nerds!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_WpsDOXtGQ (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_WpsDOXtGQ)

Thanks for the wonderful birthday gift!

I finally got to listen to it in its entirety, and it's truly well done  :)

Btw, how the hell did you guys get Richard Attenborough to narrate it - and have you pointed this towards Spielberg, Trevorrow, etc?

Happy birthday!

The voice recordings of Richard Attenborough were sampled from the game Trespasser and then edited to match our story. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 28, 2014, 04:38:23 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 28, 2014, 04:31:07 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 28, 2014, 01:01:38 PM
What's there to spoil about Godzilla? If you don't know the basic story, then you've been living under a rock. We've known about it since 1954 :P

A lot and you know it. :-*

Nuke goes off, Godzilla wakes up, moral lesson about environmental protection, Godzilla wrecks shit, fights MUTO, likely will be killed in the same fashion as 1954, end of story. Not a whole lot that's new there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 28, 2014, 04:55:16 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 28, 2014, 04:38:23 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 28, 2014, 04:31:07 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 28, 2014, 01:01:38 PM
What's there to spoil about Godzilla? If you don't know the basic story, then you've been living under a rock. We've known about it since 1954 :P

A lot and you know it. :-*

Nuke goes off, Godzilla wakes up, moral lesson about environmental protection, Godzilla wrecks shit, fights MUTO, likely will be killed in the same fashion as 1954, end of story. Not a whole lot that's new there.

Yeah, that's all assumed, but whatever goes on with the human characters is still largely up in the air.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 28, 2014, 04:56:47 PM
Good dear, does Godzilla have to be in every thread now?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Apr 28, 2014, 04:58:00 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Apr 28, 2014, 04:56:47 PM
Good dear, does Godzilla have to be in every thread now?

Yea, it's getting kinda dumb now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 28, 2014, 04:59:46 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 28, 2014, 04:38:23 PM
Nuke goes off, Godzilla wakes up, moral lesson about environmental protection, Godzilla wrecks shit, fights MUTO, likely will be killed in the same fashion as 1954, end of story. Not a whole lot that's new there.

It's not just the story dude.

Remember seeing this for the first time? Without it being a shot repeated over and over in the trailers?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg3.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20070315192616%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2F2%2F27%2FJP-WhenDinosaursRuled.jpg&hash=17b579b0193bc34380177cbfbaf51f4f7bf0e8f0)

I'm sure the Godzilla trailers have shown quite a bit that I won't see until I'm sat watching the whole story. 8)



Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 28, 2014, 05:01:01 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Apr 28, 2014, 04:56:47 PM
Good dear, does Godzilla have to be in every thread now?

Godzilla is too big for 1 thread.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 28, 2014, 05:02:27 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 28, 2014, 05:01:01 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Apr 28, 2014, 04:56:47 PM
Good dear, does Godzilla have to be in every thread now?

Godzilla is too big for 1 thread.

His foot is bigger than one thread.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 28, 2014, 05:03:19 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 28, 2014, 04:59:46 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 28, 2014, 04:38:23 PM
Nuke goes off, Godzilla wakes up, moral lesson about environmental protection, Godzilla wrecks shit, fights MUTO, likely will be killed in the same fashion as 1954, end of story. Not a whole lot that's new there.

It's not just the story dude.

Remember seeing this for the first time? Without it being a shot repeated over and over in the trailers?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg3.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20070315192616%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2F2%2F27%2FJP-WhenDinosaursRuled.jpg&hash=17b579b0193bc34380177cbfbaf51f4f7bf0e8f0)

I'm sure the Godzilla trailers have shown quite a bit that I won't see until I'm sat watching the whole story. 8)

No, I don't because I was six years old when that film was released. I didn't know anything about anything, really. I knew elementary school stuff :P

Quote from: KiramidHead on Apr 28, 2014, 04:55:16 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 28, 2014, 04:38:23 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 28, 2014, 04:31:07 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 28, 2014, 01:01:38 PM
What's there to spoil about Godzilla? If you don't know the basic story, then you've been living under a rock. We've known about it since 1954 :P

A lot and you know it. :-*

Nuke goes off, Godzilla wakes up, moral lesson about environmental protection, Godzilla wrecks shit, fights MUTO, likely will be killed in the same fashion as 1954, end of story. Not a whole lot that's new there.

Yeah, that's all assumed, but whatever goes on with the human characters is still largely up in the air.

Dr. Serizawa created Godzilla in a lab!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 28, 2014, 05:41:33 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 28, 2014, 05:03:19 PM
I didn't know anything about anything, really. I knew elementary school stuff :P

...and that is how I'm going in to see the new Godzilla, because I don't know what shots to expect, anything about any of the characters, just that its a new Godzilla film.

Don't knock it until you've tried it. :-*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on Apr 28, 2014, 05:59:47 PM
bruh if that's the way you feel about movie spoilers then get out of a thread that talks and postulates about whats going down or could go down.


Nobody needs to babysit for yo azz.


Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 28, 2014, 06:00:31 PM
I don't consider exposé shots to be spoilerific, but that's me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on Apr 28, 2014, 06:01:55 PM
he's mad because he knows there is a jeep like thingy in the movie.




bruh
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 28, 2014, 06:21:43 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 28, 2014, 04:31:07 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 28, 2014, 01:01:38 PM
What's there to spoil about Godzilla? If you don't know the basic story, then you've been living under a rock. We've known about it since 1954 :P

A lot and you know it. :-*

Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 28, 2014, 02:36:32 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 28, 2014, 10:52:22 AM
Enjoy JP nerds!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_WpsDOXtGQ (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_WpsDOXtGQ)

Thanks for the wonderful birthday gift!

I finally got to listen to it in its entirety, and it's truly well done  :)

Btw, how the hell did you guys get Richard Attenborough to narrate it - and have you pointed this towards Spielberg, Trevorrow, etc?

Happy birthday!

The voice recordings of Richard Attenborough were sampled from the game Trespasser and then edited to match our story. ;)

Huh!  Very clever 8)

And thanks :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 28, 2014, 06:31:44 PM
Quote from: Kimarhi on Apr 28, 2014, 05:59:47 PM
bruh if that's the way you feel about movie spoilers then get out of a thread that talks and postulates about whats going down or could go down.


Nobody needs to babysit for yo azz.

Fan speculations are much different to photos from the set of the new film.

Plus the spoiler link tag is there for a reason. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on Apr 28, 2014, 07:29:20 PM
I'm POSTING THE SHIT OUT OF SET PHOTOS WITHOUT SPOILERS TAGS




you have been warned
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 28, 2014, 07:31:24 PM
SPOILER ALERT: There's trucks and jeeps outside right now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 28, 2014, 07:32:09 PM
the Dino's are cgi, what could possibly be spoilery  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 28, 2014, 07:43:21 PM
It's not about ploy spoilers but about going in as blind as possible.

But I take it as my own responsibility. I will probably abandon this thread sometime soon. Until the movie is out. It will make the whole experience more exciting once I'm there. Even if it ends up sucking.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 28, 2014, 07:43:43 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.qkme.me%2F3uung9.jpg&hash=4501890e21257d4922a546700b9e46cf39e91044)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on Apr 28, 2014, 07:48:22 PM
I never knew Jim Carey made that face in that movie.


SPOILER!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 28, 2014, 07:51:39 PM
Guys, you may not know this, but there just might be a GTO in the next Vin Diesel movie.

SPOILER!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Apr 28, 2014, 07:51:48 PM
Every spoiler is somebody's first.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 28, 2014, 07:52:41 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Apr 28, 2014, 07:43:21 PM
It's not about ploy spoilers but about going in as blind as possible.

But I take it as my own responsibility. I will probably abandon this thread sometime soon. Until the movie is out. It will make the whole experience more exciting once I'm there. Even if it ends up sucking.

Jeeps and land and trees shouldn't detract from that  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 28, 2014, 08:05:51 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Apr 28, 2014, 07:52:41 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Apr 28, 2014, 07:43:21 PM
It's not about ploy spoilers but about going in as blind as possible.

But I take it as my own responsibility. I will probably abandon this thread sometime soon. Until the movie is out. It will make the whole experience more exciting once I'm there. Even if it ends up sucking.

Jeeps and land and trees shouldn't detract from that  :P

Yeah I know. To me those things aren't such a big deal. But I get what he's sayin is all im sayin.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 28, 2014, 08:06:00 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Apr 28, 2014, 07:51:39 PM
Guys, you may not know this, but there just might be a GTO in the next Vin Diesel movie.

SPOILER!

250? 288? 599? Pontiac? Mitsubishi? Greater specificity is required.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 28, 2014, 08:07:46 PM
Quote from: Kimarhi on Apr 28, 2014, 07:48:22 PM
I never knew Jim Carey made that face in that movie.


SPOILER!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg1.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20121103005348%2Fglee%2Fimages%2F7%2F78%2FTroll_in_the_dungeon%21.gif&hash=3ff3d242b772de31f9e0531bb3f32bb92c9fde90)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 28, 2014, 08:11:34 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 28, 2014, 08:07:46 PM
Quote from: Kimarhi on Apr 28, 2014, 07:48:22 PM
I never knew Jim Carey made that face in that movie.


SPOILER!

http://img1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20121103005348/glee/images/7/78/Troll_in_the_dungeon!.gif

That's ironic because the real evil just came through that door :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 28, 2014, 08:15:34 PM
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
:-*
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on Apr 28, 2014, 08:16:36 PM
I'm just saying that if you come into a JP thread that is discussing the new movies based on information that is readily available to everyone and expect everybody to conform to your standards then your just setting yourself up for disappointment.


If on the flipside some pirate motherf**ker comes in with a bootleg copy and starts spoiling everything for everyone then he is an asshole toolbag.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 28, 2014, 08:23:22 PM
Quote from: Kimarhi on Apr 28, 2014, 08:16:36 PM
I'm just saying that if you come into a JP thread that is discussing the new movies based on information that is readily available to everyone and expect everybody to conform to your standards then your just setting yourself up for disappointment.

My standards being just use the spoiler tag. This isn't just for JW but all upcoming movies.

Isn't that a rule of this site?

::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on Apr 28, 2014, 08:23:58 PM
For f**king set photos.  No.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 28, 2014, 08:29:32 PM
set photos are A-OK Alien3
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 28, 2014, 08:31:39 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 28, 2014, 08:23:22 PM
Quote from: Kimarhi on Apr 28, 2014, 08:16:36 PM
I'm just saying that if you come into a JP thread that is discussing the new movies based on information that is readily available to everyone and expect everybody to conform to your standards then your just setting yourself up for disappointment.

My standards being just use the spoiler tag. This isn't just for JW but all upcoming movies.

Isn't that a rule of this site?

::)

If the photos revealed anything potentially plot critical, then I'd say yes. But pictures of cars without any context? Not really.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Apr 28, 2014, 08:35:11 PM
Have to agree with the fact that while spoilers should be in spoiler tags, these set pictures are not true spoilers therefore don't have to be in tags, they're just cars and stuff.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 28, 2014, 08:41:01 PM
So what about people like me who don't want to see the vehicles? Who'd like to keep as much stuff a surprise until the films released? What harm would it do to just post any leaked set photos in a spoiler link?

Like I said its not just story.

That image posted a few pages back with the dude stood next to the truck with ACU plastered on his jacket is a prime example of something I'd rather not see yet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on Apr 28, 2014, 08:42:49 PM
Then don't come to a thread that is in an active discussion about the movie.  Because VERY LIKELY people will be talking about the images unless you want them to spoiler their conversations as well.  Which is a douche move.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 28, 2014, 08:43:47 PM
Quote from: Kimarhi on Apr 28, 2014, 08:42:49 PM
Then don't come to a thread that is in an active discussion about the movie.  Because VERY LIKELY people will be talking about the images unless you want them to spoiler their conversations as well.  Which is a douche move.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 28, 2014, 08:46:01 PM
If it's something potentially spoilerish, yes.

Plus this isn't a thread just for the forth movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on Apr 28, 2014, 08:47:47 PM
Somebody grab dis nigga.



Alien 3, in my experience you seem like an okay dude and I agree with you on a lot of things but this is not one of them.  I recommend you just avoid my post in this thread from here on in.

Because I won't be controlled by THE MAN.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 28, 2014, 08:48:41 PM
he'll just be sucking on him
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on Apr 28, 2014, 08:56:51 PM
f**king aspie
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 28, 2014, 09:00:06 PM
My original post.

Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 27, 2014, 09:34:55 PM
I fully understand that those set pics don't reveal anything majorly spoilerish but it would be nice if you guys posted those kinds of photos under a spoiler tag.

Just sayin' in the future there's gonna be spoilers a' flyin' and I don't want it ruined.

Quote from: Aspie on Apr 28, 2014, 08:48:41 PM
he'll just be sucking on him

Lapping up every tiny detail of every leaked set photo until he sees the film and goes, "meh it was soooo predictable".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Apr 28, 2014, 09:15:21 PM
Don't worry. When there are actual spoilers we'll use spoiler tags.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on Apr 28, 2014, 09:23:04 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 28, 2014, 09:00:06 PM
My original post.

Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 27, 2014, 09:34:55 PM
I fully understand that those set pics don't reveal anything majorly spoilerish but it would be nice if you guys posted those kinds of photos under a spoiler tag.

Just sayin' in the future there's gonna be spoilers a' flyin' and I don't want it ruined.

Quote from: Aspie on Apr 28, 2014, 08:48:41 PM
he'll just be sucking on him

Lapping up every tiny detail of every leaked set photo until he sees the film and goes, "meh it was soooo predictable".

Mofo I've been in this thread less than you have.  I just happened to come in with you doing one of my all time pet peeves in trying to moderate other people on the internet over some stupid shit. 

Its clear that your sociopathic enough that you are incapable of seeing the POV from EVERYBODY ELSE that has called you out on this so just don't be butthurt when other people post motherf**king SET PHOTOS without spoiler tags. 

wtf man  Aspie get your bro.

Soon he'll be asking you not to post the trailers because you made him push the play button.  GTFO of here with that shit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 28, 2014, 09:25:01 PM
Quote from: Cal427eb on Apr 28, 2014, 09:15:21 PM
Don't worry. When there are actual spoilers we'll use spoiler tags.

;)

Quote from: Kimarhi on Apr 28, 2014, 09:23:04 PM
Mofo I've been in this thread less than you have.  I just happened to come in with you doing one of my all time pet peeves in trying to moderate other people on the internet over some stupid shit. 

Its clear that your sociopathic enough that you are incapable of seeing the POV from EVERYBODY ELSE that has called you out on this so just don't be butthurt when other people post motherf**king SET PHOTOS without spoiler tags. 

So you're saying I can't kick up a fuss if, in the future, I come into this thread and someone has posted a "SET PHOTO" of something like this leaked from the JW set...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F24.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_m8ysl0pnTz1rdzko8o1_500.jpg&hash=08e12459e9899f0d24a058d37963477deaa902d1)


Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Apr 28, 2014, 09:28:16 PM
Quote from: Cal427eb on Apr 28, 2014, 09:15:21 PM
Don't worry. When there are actual spoilers we'll use spoiler tags.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 28, 2014, 09:30:18 PM
lol Alien3 u come in a film forum into a JP thread you bettah prepare yourself to minimal exposure


cuz it ain't evah gonna cease
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Apr 28, 2014, 09:38:30 PM
Be careful you don't post a picture of the mother flippin' beach!

IT'S GONNA SPOIL THE WHOLE DAMN MOVIE!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 28, 2014, 09:39:24 PM
the film is about a new park.
There are dinosaurs in it.
Some of them will probably get out.
They will probably kill people.
The park probably gets evacuated.
The lead scientist character probably learns a moral lesson about how animals should ALWAYS BE LEFT FREE!!!.....
even though nature is red in tooth and claw and most animals would lead a life devoid of gory violence and horrible death within a fully functional park with separated pens between herbivores and carnivores all overseen by good veterinarians and biologists. :P

It'll probably be an ok rethread of the first film i'm sure.. but a rethread nonetheless.
The leaked
Spoiler
script pages even point at repeats of dialogue scenes from the first film.
[close]

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 28, 2014, 09:40:38 PM
I heard there are dinosaurs in the movie

and they walk and run and eat humans and stuff


Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 28, 2014, 09:41:13 PM
SPOILER!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 28, 2014, 09:42:25 PM
There's shouldn't be spoilers on this shit. I mean people have been posting set photos, character posters etc. in those comic book movie threads for years without (spoiler tags) -- and it's never bothered anyone.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Apr 28, 2014, 09:47:23 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Apr 28, 2014, 09:40:38 PM
I heard there are dinosaurs in the movie

and they walk and run and eat humans and stuff

HOLY SHAT ASPIE SPOILERZ!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on Apr 28, 2014, 09:47:54 PM
I've said my piece.  I honestly don't have a problem with A3 I just can't get with him on this issue.  Sorry bro.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 28, 2014, 09:52:53 PM
That's fine it's just strange to see my options as...

1. Get out of thread and don't come back until you've seen JW.
2. See spoilers and leaked set photos.

As I mentioned before this isn't just a thread about the forth film and I don't wanna have to leave because some people won't use the spoiler tag.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 28, 2014, 09:53:26 PM
New film is about a bunch of cocaine drug lords invading the new Jurassic World theme park to set up their own base of operations and turn the island into DRUG LORD HEAVEN.

There, i've spoiled it all for you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Apr 28, 2014, 09:59:55 PM
We've all been around, we all know how to realistically use the spoiler tag. You can't expect everyone to just bow down to your own individual nitpicky desires.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 28, 2014, 10:03:32 PM
Let's just enjoy this....

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi513.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Ft331%2FSouthpawE46%2F1206744941837.jpg&hash=1541b27f26cac87d09277c9c18d8dbf66804f7f7)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 28, 2014, 10:09:02 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 28, 2014, 09:53:26 PM
New film is about a bunch of cocaine drug lords invading the new Jurassic World theme park to set up their own base of operations and turn the island into DRUG LORD HEAVEN.

There, i've spoiled it all for you.

I...I like that idea honestly. Sounds like something straight out of an 80s actioner. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 28, 2014, 10:12:04 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Apr 28, 2014, 10:09:02 PM
I...I like that idea honestly. Sounds like something straight out of an 80s actioner. :laugh:

Actually.. There were colombian drug lords in
the actual Jurassic Park 4 script by acclaimed writer John Sayles. Yeah, the script that got cancelled.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1293.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fb584%2Fmetalgeartx55%2Fscript_zpse6c267d2.jpg&hash=10a1219cfe3a76509056620c46e0e30a0d3ef811)

Dinosaurios pendejos!
Jajajajajaja

;D

PURE 80's ACTION GOODNESS.

:laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 28, 2014, 10:12:36 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Apr 28, 2014, 10:09:02 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 28, 2014, 09:53:26 PM
New film is about a bunch of cocaine drug lords invading the new Jurassic World theme park to set up their own base of operations and turn the island into DRUG LORD HEAVEN.

There, i've spoiled it all for you.

I...I like that idea honestly. Sounds like something straight out of an 80s actioner. :laugh:

Sounds like a passable spinoff of Predator 2. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Apr 28, 2014, 10:25:28 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Apr 28, 2014, 10:12:36 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Apr 28, 2014, 10:09:02 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 28, 2014, 09:53:26 PM
New film is about a bunch of cocaine drug lords invading the new Jurassic World theme park to set up their own base of operations and turn the island into DRUG LORD HEAVEN.

There, i've spoiled it all for you.

I...I like that idea honestly. Sounds like something straight out of an 80s actioner. :laugh:

Sounds like a passable spinoff of Predator 2. :laugh:

"shit happens."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on Apr 28, 2014, 10:50:42 PM
Sounds like Aliens Criminal Enterprise.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 29, 2014, 12:31:46 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Apr 28, 2014, 09:42:25 PM
There's shouldn't be spoilers on this shit. I mean people have been posting set photos, character posters etc. in those comic book movie threads for years without (spoiler tags) -- and it's never bothered anyone.

Actually bothers me. But I've chosen to abandon the threads while filming.  Like I didn't know Avengers: AoU takes place in different locales around the world. That was ruined by set photos. Also Cap amd Hawkeye's suits.

Although they aren't plot spoilers, I'd rather find out all that stuff in a trailer or when the movie hits.

But I actually don't mind skipping out on some threads. Does seem a bit extreme to be forced to do that though. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on Apr 29, 2014, 01:21:35 AM
Nobody is being forced to do anything.  When your scrolling and see a picture, scroll down quickly and don't look at it.  YOUR OWN MIND MAKES YOU STOP AND LOOK AT SHIT NOT SOMEBODY ELSE.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 29, 2014, 01:49:27 AM
The only time I've seen a movie spoiled by an openly posted set pic is TDKR, and that was more from unmarked speculation from fans than the pic itself.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 29, 2014, 01:50:52 AM
Alright mates.  I think this argument about being spoiled has gone on long enough today.

ENOUGH!!!!!!!!

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 29, 2014, 01:53:36 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQklbDXJjvI#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQklbDXJjvI#ws)

Spoiler
Dumbledore dies... Trinity Dies.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 29, 2014, 02:12:32 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 29, 2014, 01:53:36 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQklbDXJjvI#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQklbDXJjvI#ws)

Spoiler
Dumbledore dies... Trinity Dies.
[close]

Spoiler
Godzilla is in Godzilla.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 29, 2014, 03:02:30 AM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Apr 28, 2014, 09:28:16 PM
Quote from: Cal427eb on Apr 28, 2014, 09:15:21 PM
Don't worry. When there are actual spoilers we'll use spoiler tags.

Spoilers







































Spinosaurus kills T.Rex again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 29, 2014, 03:40:27 AM
GOD DAMN IT!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Apr 29, 2014, 03:48:10 AM
ALAN.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 29, 2014, 08:23:21 AM
Quote from: Kimarhi on Apr 29, 2014, 01:21:35 AM
YOUR OWN MIND MAKES YOU STOP AND LOOK AT SHIT NOT SOMEBODY ELSE.

Okay. ;D

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jessicarulestheuniverse.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F10%2Fa_3x-horizontal-1.jpg&hash=da0daf755f8ab4cb30028d2bc2255725026ac2e4)

Quote from: xeno-kaname on Apr 29, 2014, 12:31:46 AM
Like I didn't know Avengers: AoU takes place in different locales around the world. That was ruined by set photos. Also Cap amd Hawkeye's suits.

Exactly.

If there was a specific Jurassic World thread then I'd stay clear of it but this isn't a thread for just that, it's the entire series, and as someone who loves this franchise I love talking to you guys on here about 1,2 and 3.

Quote from: Crazy Rich on Apr 28, 2014, 09:59:55 PM
You can't expect everyone to just bow down to your own individual nitpicky desires.

I wasn't asking for people to "bow down" just saying it'd be nice if leaked set photos just be posted under a spoiler-tag.

Is that really that nitpicky?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Apr 29, 2014, 08:58:17 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Apr 29, 2014, 03:48:10 AM
ALAN.

A L A N
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 29, 2014, 11:11:53 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 29, 2014, 08:23:21 AM
Quote from: Kimarhi on Apr 29, 2014, 01:21:35 AM
YOUR OWN MIND MAKES YOU STOP AND LOOK AT SHIT NOT SOMEBODY ELSE.

Okay. ;D

http://www.jessicarulestheuniverse.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/a_3x-horizontal-1.jpg


I don't know what's sadder, that someone took the time to write these or that they're selling well-enough to warrant more being written.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 29, 2014, 12:00:03 PM
They're novelizations of Jurassic World.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 29, 2014, 12:12:52 PM
Of course ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on Apr 29, 2014, 04:06:16 PM
Christie Sims is a phreak.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 29, 2014, 06:01:05 PM
Quote from: Kimarhi on Apr 29, 2014, 04:06:16 PM
Christie Sims is a phreak.

Sorry for forcing your eyes to see that. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 29, 2014, 08:27:41 PM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc1/t1.0-9/10255787_733425646701949_3133819036090199696_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on Apr 29, 2014, 08:32:18 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 29, 2014, 06:01:05 PM
Quote from: Kimarhi on Apr 29, 2014, 04:06:16 PM
Christie Sims is a phreak.

Sorry for forcing your eyes to see that. :P

You didn't force them to do anything.








Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Apr 29, 2014, 08:33:16 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Apr 29, 2014, 08:27:41 PM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc1/t1.0-9/10255787_733425646701949_3133819036090199696_n.jpg)
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 29, 2014, 08:34:05 PM
SPOILERS!

SPOILERS!

Spoiler
Ingen is back... somehow. :P
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Apr 29, 2014, 08:47:30 PM
oh boy
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 29, 2014, 09:30:21 PM
Saw Jurassic Park again...

9/10..... what a film... Even with all the dumb ass Chaotician talk. :laugh: Ian is such a sleazeball.

Now moving onto The Lost World!.... getting ready for the drop in quality. :-X
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on Apr 29, 2014, 09:33:06 PM
Ian Malcom is pimptacular.


Get on his level.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 29, 2014, 09:49:40 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 29, 2014, 09:30:21 PM
Now moving onto The Lost World!.... getting ready for the drop in quality. :-X

You must have been watching The Lost World TV show.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Apr 29, 2014, 09:51:06 PM
If InGen is back then why the hell use PatelCorp instead of BioSyn? *grumbles*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Apr 29, 2014, 10:21:23 PM
Was the name Patel ever confirmed? I thought PatelCorp was just made up in those fake videos.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 30, 2014, 12:21:17 AM
...halfway through The Lost World...
why are the characters in here dumber and less likeable than those in the original film? :P
What was up with that flying exploding car?  :laugh:

Eddie Carr and Roland Tembo ftw though.

Sarah Harding and Nick van Owen.. you dumb, dumb madafakas... their whole thing about letting those animals loose in the hunters camp can also be seen as dumb because in captivity those animals have less chances of dying at the hands of terrifying predators... Yeah the Ingen hunters were hurting the animals... but letting the animals loose also increases the chances of having the hunters use deadly force on the animals themselves to prevent them from getting away... not to mention that the animals could have gotten people killed.

In the court of law.... could one actually sue Sarah and Nick over the death of Eddie? X) bringing the Rex infant was a huge danger... and it resulted in the death of one team member. DUMB.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 30, 2014, 12:26:41 AM
The movie should have just been about Tembo. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 30, 2014, 12:35:59 AM
^Aye.. even though wounding the Rex infant was a despicable act. :P The deleted scene makes him more interesting and morally complex. An old hunter that looks at his past deeds with hatred and is sorta heroic and gentlemanly.. is then pulled into a deal with the devil because despite his better nature he just cant control his desire to hunt a legendary creature. That.. is interesting anti-hero shit right there.

Dieter Stark's death was fitting though. As f**ked up as that of Neddry's.

Back to the film...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 30, 2014, 12:40:30 AM
Isn't there a deleted scene where Ludlow gets drunk and falls on the baby? :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 30, 2014, 12:43:35 AM
lol there is! That's another dumb character. :P

The film, edited as it is makes Roland much more of a villain.... just to make the pace faster.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 30, 2014, 12:47:30 AM
Yeah, Private Cowboy's British accent is kind of goofy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 30, 2014, 12:57:51 AM
Nick van Owen cockblocking Roland Tembo by switching his bullets with duds... thereby contributing to getting Nick himself in danger.. because actual useful bullets in the gun of the guy who is protecting YOU are a bad thing...

DUMB.  :laugh:

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 30, 2014, 01:00:53 AM
Yeah, Nick is so not money in this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 30, 2014, 01:02:24 AM
the dumbness of the film is a damn shame because there are some really damn good set pieces in this... wich Spielberg directs with gusto. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on Apr 30, 2014, 01:21:32 AM
The thing that bothered me about the second movie was that it wasn't the second book.  Smaller cast with a more interesting dynamic between the surviving characters and dinosaurs.  I felt it was much stronger than the movie was.

I felt the opposite about the original film.  Thinking it was superior to the original book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 30, 2014, 01:22:18 AM
The book would have been great if Malcolm would have shut the f**k up and not lectured for pages on end.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on Apr 30, 2014, 01:25:51 AM
I don't remember Malcom lecturing as much as that other dude.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 30, 2014, 01:27:38 AM
I remember Malcolm chiming in about some sort of paleontological theory every other page... even though he's not a paleontologist. :laugh: Not to mention the fact he pulled a Jesus between books. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on Apr 30, 2014, 01:33:33 AM
I remember more the dude who didn't believe in the science the others were preaching going on for some pages.  Maybe its time for a reread.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 30, 2014, 01:45:49 AM
Quote from: Kimarhi on Apr 30, 2014, 01:33:33 AM
I remember more the dude who didn't believe in the science the others were preaching going on for some pages.  Maybe its time for a reread.

Levine. I liked Levine. He would've been an interesting character to see on screen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Apr 30, 2014, 01:56:40 AM
Wasn't that Thorne?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 30, 2014, 02:08:40 AM
Thorne was the guy that folded into Eddie for the movie, I believe.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 30, 2014, 02:22:26 AM
Here's an awesome birthday present I got from my sister....

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/t1.0-9/10313986_10201407518981373_7890418378763039269_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on Apr 30, 2014, 02:53:30 AM
I approve of your sister's taste in shirts.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 30, 2014, 03:50:58 AM
Unfortunately, I hate anything that is related to the "Keep Calm" poster now. f**king annoying. The internet beat it to the ground.

This is probably the best one, though. The logo and font make it bounds more creative than all the other shit versions on the internet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 30, 2014, 11:22:05 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 30, 2014, 12:21:17 AM
...halfway through The Lost World...
why are the characters in here dumber and less likeable than those in the original film? :P
What was up with that flying exploding car?  :laugh:

I always thought that was a byproduct of the explosion we see a second or so before it comes crashing down.

Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 30, 2014, 12:21:17 AM
Sarah Harding and Nick van Owen.. you dumb, dumb madafakas... their whole thing about letting those animals loose in the hunters camp can also be seen as dumb because in captivity those animals have less chances of dying at the hands of terrifying predators... Yeah the Ingen hunters were hurting the animals... but letting the animals loose also increases the chances of having the hunters use deadly force on the animals themselves to prevent them from getting away... not to mention that the animals could have gotten people killed.

Less chance of dying at the hands of terrifying predators is just nature doing its own thing. There's nothing to be protected from in that sense. The hunters likely would not have used deadly force, lest Ludlow take their heads for his wall because he was so set on bringing them back to the mainland.

Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 30, 2014, 12:21:17 AM
In the court of law.... could one actually sue Sarah and Nick over the death of Eddie? X) bringing the Rex infant was a huge danger... and it resulted in the death of one team member. DUMB.

No, because it was a random event. No one could have predicted that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 30, 2014, 02:35:06 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 30, 2014, 11:22:05 AM
No, because it was a random event. No one could have predicted that.

The Rex-es destroying their cars and trailers wasnt random.
Sarah practically says to Nick that it's a bad idea to bring the infant rex. As a good paleontologist she probably knew that the parents will follow the infant's cries (like Roland wanted them to in a earlier scene)... resulting in predictable fatal trouble for them. As good as the intentions are, it's just a dumb act. Kelly sees this and does the smart thing by requesting to go to the high-hide. Ian sees the danger as well.

The characters knew it was dangerous to their team... and it indeed resulted in the death of a team mate. They predicted the danger... and the worst case scenario happened.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 30, 2014, 02:39:12 PM
It's a really, really stupid film. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Apr 30, 2014, 02:46:21 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thearnoldfans.com%2Fstorage%2Ffaran-sitting.jpg%3F__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION%3D1383174257842&hash=6e3489d5b98d25ffa1d398041ae9b4991cbd68ed)

"These fffffff**ks"

Spoiler
Hope y'all've seen the movie
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 30, 2014, 02:50:50 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 30, 2014, 02:35:06 PMSarah practically says to Nick that it's a bad idea to bring the infant rex. As a good paleontologist she probably knew that the parents will follow the infant's cries

I have a problem with this because it doesn't make sense, the way it happens in the film. Nick muzzles the juvenile before mummy and daddy start stomping their way over to the trailer. There's no way they would have been able to pinpoint junior, unless they have some sort of psychic bond and know exactly where he is at all times.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 30, 2014, 02:52:54 PM
Nah, watch the film again. The Rex infant comes with them in the car and was screaming all the way through their journey back to the trailer. Nick only muzzles the infant after he is already inside the trailer and before Sarah patches up the infant's wound... 

Eddie asks "what the hell was that?" Due to the Rex's screams as Nick and Sarah drive by.

No psychic bond required. Good old fashioned Rex ears hear the scream. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 30, 2014, 02:55:20 PM
Plus they could smell the blood coming from the wound on its leg and what was plastered all over Sarah's jacket.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 30, 2014, 02:59:19 PM
That too.

As a paleontologist one would think Sarah would know better than to stick with that jacket after it was covered in Rex blood. :P Roland even sees the blood at one point and fails to mention the danger. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 30, 2014, 03:04:22 PM
You'd think John Hammond would have the sense not to bring these things back from the dead.

All these movies suck. GGGAWWDDD! ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 30, 2014, 03:07:07 PM
Not to mention that Nick could and should have received a righteous ass kicking for sabotaging Tembo's bullets. Several more people Died because of that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 30, 2014, 03:11:30 PM
That's part of the point of the film: basically listen to Malcolm. Sarah told Ian she didn't need him and that everything would be okay -- because she knows how to behave in these situations, has been analyzing predator behaviours, etc. -- and she's totally wrong about it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 30, 2014, 03:12:29 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Apr 30, 2014, 03:07:07 PM
Not to mention that Nick could and should have received a righteous ass kicking for sabotaging Tembo's bullets. Several more people Died because of that.
What the hell even happens to him? He just randomly vanishes once his "usefulness" to the plot finishes :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 30, 2014, 03:13:25 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 30, 2014, 03:12:29 PM
What the hell even happens to him? He just randomly vanishes once his "usefulness" to the plot finishes :laugh:

Doesn't that apply to all characters in all movies?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 30, 2014, 03:15:15 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 30, 2014, 03:04:22 PM
You'd think John Hammond would have the sense not to bring these things back from the dead.

All these movies suck. GGGAWWDDD! ::)

Lol Nah that is just pure HUBRIS and John being consumed by his dream. It's great and it works really well... the fact that he is such a dreamer is actually kind of really relatable and likeable. And bringing the dinosaurs back wasnt the problem per se of the first park.. it was bringing the carnivores as well and hiring easily corrupted people to work at the park. :P lolz.

Sarah ignoring the danger repeatedly through the film ...  just makes her seem really DUMB and unlikeable (to me at least). It also makes her something of a damsel in distress (especially during the Rex attack on the trailers).

I couldnt wait for her to be eaten.  :P

Ellie Satler > Sarah Harding. :P Easily. Ellie was a pro who got shit done.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 30, 2014, 03:16:45 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 30, 2014, 03:13:25 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 30, 2014, 03:12:29 PM
What the hell even happens to him? He just randomly vanishes once his "usefulness" to the plot finishes :laugh:

Doesn't that apply to all characters in all movies?
Only shitty ones with haphazard plot construction.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 30, 2014, 03:18:52 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 30, 2014, 03:16:45 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 30, 2014, 03:13:25 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 30, 2014, 03:12:29 PM
What the hell even happens to him? He just randomly vanishes once his "usefulness" to the plot finishes :laugh:

Doesn't that apply to all characters in all movies?
Only shitty ones with haphazard plot construction.

Where the writer took advice from a nine-year-old kid. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 30, 2014, 03:20:07 PM
^what?  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 30, 2014, 03:28:09 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 30, 2014, 02:59:19 PM
That too.

As a paleontologist one would think Sarah would know better than to stick with that jacket after it was covered in Rex blood. :P Roland even sees the blood at one point and fails to mention the danger. :P

That scene was presented in a very awkward manner. It displayed as if there's danger when really, all that happened was that Sarah brushed up against in.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 30, 2014, 03:32:06 PM
I don't have a problem with the rexes following junior back to the trailers (they even say in the film that Tyrannosaurus had an extraordinary sense of smell), what doesn't make any sense is when both of them track Sarah miles across the island based on the smell of their infant, when they already knew exactly where it was. Did they suddenly become so stupid that they couldn't count how many babies they had? Or are these dinosaurs just hell-bent on revenge, making them the movie monsters that Spielberg was so keen on avoiding in the first film?

Anyway, as for Sarah's motivation, that's one of the very few sequences in the film that's lifted from the novel. In said book, Sarah isn't a palaeontologist at all, and the only member of the party who is doesn't find out about the abducted youngster until it's too late. In her defence though, it's pretty rare in nature for animal parents to track down their babies when they're driven away in a car.


:edit: Holy flying spaghetti monster, 8 ninja posts.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 30, 2014, 03:32:54 PM
I'm just going to leave you guys to rip apart The Lost world until you realise how miserable life is without it.

Spoiler
The Lost World RULES MUDDAf**kERS!
Spoiler
Don't agree?
Spoiler
Well I've seen the new Godzilla so NERRR :-*
Spoiler
Joking have fun.
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 30, 2014, 03:48:09 PM
Confession... I actually kind of liked the Kelly character..... i didnt really have a problem with her presence in the film despite the "KID FRIENDLY" idea of her stowing away inside the trailer. :P (Didnt anyone bother to check? No? Fine.)

She gets out of trouble at most points in the film and even kills a velociraptor.... in THE SILLIEST SCENE TO END ALL SILLY SCENES, sure... but she still killed one.

Kelly > Sarah. Kelly was a silly character.. but she got shit done! Sarah for the most part just got people in danger. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 30, 2014, 03:49:11 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Apr 30, 2014, 03:32:06 PMmaking them the movie monsters that Spielberg was so keen on avoiding in the first film?

If that's true, he did a rather lousy job.

Quote from: Vertigo on Apr 30, 2014, 03:32:06 PMIn her defence though, it's pretty rare in nature for animal parents to track down their babies when they're driven away in a car.

Blame genetic engineering.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 30, 2014, 03:50:23 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 30, 2014, 03:48:09 PM
Confession... I actually kind of liked the Kelly character..... i didnt really have a problem with her presence in the film despite the "KID FRIENDLY" idea of her stowing away inside the trailer. :P (Didnt anyone bother to check? No? Fine.)

She gets out of trouble at most points in the film and even kills a velociraptor.... in THE SILLIEST SCENE TO END ALL SILLY SCENES, sure... but she still killed one.

Kelly > Sarah. Kelly got shit done. Sarah for the most part just got people in danger. :laugh:
She still has absolutely no place in the film or actual plot relevance, and is just there to kill two demographic quotas with one stone: the kiddies AND the token black character. Its so crass and transparent :P She's also super annoying and whiny, and her stock Spielbergian "daddy issues!!!" thing is really trite.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 30, 2014, 03:51:53 PM
you just hate kids in general. Admit it.  ;D

Yeah she's just there to hit two demographics.. i still didnt mind her presence that much.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 30, 2014, 03:54:04 PM
I'm, eh, just gonna leave this here...


http://www.tor.com/blogs/2013/03/why-doesnt-anyone-like-the-lost-world-jurassic-park (http://www.tor.com/blogs/2013/03/why-doesnt-anyone-like-the-lost-world-jurassic-park)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 30, 2014, 03:59:40 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 30, 2014, 03:51:53 PM
you just hate kids in general. Admit it.  ;D
You will too after you finish your JPIII rewatch ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 30, 2014, 04:00:38 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 30, 2014, 03:20:07 PM
^what?  :laugh:

David Koepp received a letter from a lid complaining that the Dinos took too long to show up in the first movie, and he kept it posted above his Desk while wtiting TLW. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 30, 2014, 04:03:08 PM
quotes from the TOR article Alien3 posted...

QuoteThe problem with The Lost World is that it eliminates that sense of isolation.

Noooooooooo... the problem is that it is just so poorly written. :P

QuoteIn turn, The Lost World becomes a story that is utterly powered by the motivations of women; a scientist who wants to understand nature, a girl who wants to know her father, a mother—and father, as it is the male T-Rex stomping through California—who will do anything to get their child back.

Yeah that's all really cool. But it's not enough to save the film for me. :P

QuoteAgain, I would like to point out: a woman, who is a scientist, cares so much about said science that she essentially guides us through the whole movie. That alone is reason enough for applause, no matter how much Ian Malcolm wants everyone to believe she's crazy.

But she's proven time and time again to be dumb enough to get in dangerous situations where she "should" know better as a scientist.... if the character was written better then it would be actually applause worthy...  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 30, 2014, 04:05:45 PM
Trying to paint it as some feminist genre masterwork, lulz. It ain't no Gamera trilogy, lady :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 30, 2014, 04:07:03 PM
ladies in the gamera films get shit done.

Sarah Harding ends up feeling like yet another damsel in distress.... disguised as a strong character.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 30, 2014, 04:09:36 PM
And it tried to pass off an ecoterrorist as a hero. *Gags
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 30, 2014, 04:10:04 PM
Speaking of the Gamera trilogy... from Ebert's review of The Lost World:

QuoteThe monster-stepping-on-cars sequences in the current Japanese import "Gamera: Guardian of the Universe'' are more entertaining.

;D ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 30, 2014, 04:21:47 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 30, 2014, 04:07:03 PM
Sarah Harding ends up feeling like yet another damsel in distress.... disguised as a strong character.

A real damsel when she's firing the tranquilizer at the male Rex on the boat.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 30, 2014, 04:22:44 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 30, 2014, 03:54:04 PM
I'm, eh, just gonna leave this here...


http://www.tor.com/blogs/2013/03/why-doesnt-anyone-like-the-lost-world-jurassic-park (http://www.tor.com/blogs/2013/03/why-doesnt-anyone-like-the-lost-world-jurassic-park)

"The problem with The Lost World is that it eliminates that sense of isolation."

If that's a problem (I'm not sure it is), it's got to be pretty goddamn low on the list. Absence of any sense of wonder, hamfisted writing, awkward pacing, almost exactly the same roster of dinosaurs, bringing back Malcolm only to have him fully-shirted and largely humourless, portraying the animals almost solely as monsters, that slightly nasty tone that pervades right from the girl's attack at the start, losing the message...
I agree with the article that TLW would be better-remembered if it was the first film, and didn't have that towering yardstick of Jurassic Park to live up to, but it's still riddled with issues.

Got to say though, I don't mind Kelly (under the proviso that a child is arbitrary - she's no Eric, at least) or Rexzilla. And there are some pretty damned excellent action sequences.

:edit: More ninjaing :|
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 30, 2014, 04:32:59 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 30, 2014, 04:21:47 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 30, 2014, 04:07:03 PM
Sarah Harding ends up feeling like yet another damsel in distress.... disguised as a strong character.

A real damsel when she's firing the tranquilizer at the male Rex on the boat.

Her one moment of pure badassery. But it's too little too late. :P

Quote from: Vertigo on Apr 30, 2014, 04:22:44 PM
:edit: More ninjaing :|

type faster.  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 30, 2014, 04:34:45 PM
Or just in time. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 30, 2014, 04:40:00 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 30, 2014, 03:59:40 PM
You will too after you finish your JPIII rewatch ;D

grunfgrumblegrunfgrumblgrunfgrumble.

I think i'll see that one in the weekend...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Apr 30, 2014, 05:14:01 PM
I want Jurassic World to have a woman get eaten.

Because in these movies it's like estrogen scares off dinosaurs or something.

Have I said this before? I don't know.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 30, 2014, 05:15:00 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Apr 30, 2014, 04:22:44 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 30, 2014, 03:54:04 PM
I'm, eh, just gonna leave this here...


http://www.tor.com/blogs/2013/03/why-doesnt-anyone-like-the-lost-world-jurassic-park (http://www.tor.com/blogs/2013/03/why-doesnt-anyone-like-the-lost-world-jurassic-park)

"The problem with The Lost World is that it eliminates that sense of isolation."

If that's a problem (I'm not sure it is), it's got to be pretty goddamn low on the list. Absence of any sense of wonder, hamfisted writing, awkward pacing, almost exactly the same roster of dinosaurs, bringing back Malcolm only to have him fully-shirted and largely humourless, portraying the animals almost solely as monsters, that slightly nasty tone that pervades right from the girl's attack at the start, losing the message...
I agree with the article that TLW would be better-remembered if it was the first film, and didn't have that towering yardstick of Jurassic Park to live up to, but it's still riddled with issues.

Got to say though, I don't mind Kelly (under the proviso that a child is arbitrary - she's no Eric, at least) or Rexzilla. And there are some pretty damned excellent action sequences.

:edit: More ninjaing :|

The message definitely wasn't lost. TLW is about animal exploitation and humanity's greed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 30, 2014, 05:15:46 PM
Quote from: BANE on Apr 30, 2014, 05:14:01 PM
I want Jurassic World to have a woman get eaten.

Because in these movies it's like estrogen scares off dinosaurs or something.

Have I said this before? I don't know.

..it's not as if spielberg goes out of his way to avoid kilingl women in his films... :P

cough cough first scene in Jaws.. cough cough.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 30, 2014, 05:16:37 PM
"It's about humanity's greed/hubris" = it's just another dumb, tired blockbuster with nothing new or interesting to say ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 30, 2014, 05:19:00 PM
It's an awesome movie.

And one of the best sequels ever.

;D

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 30, 2014, 05:31:09 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 30, 2014, 05:16:37 PM
"It's about humanity's greed/hubris" = it's just another dumb, tired blockbuster with nothing new or interesting to say ;D

Sure, if you're a wooden board of a viewer.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 30, 2014, 05:34:09 PM
Doom's dinoboner has been offended. Jimmies have been rustled :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Apr 30, 2014, 05:51:59 PM
I can enjoy The Lost World despite some flaws...

... but wooden board?

Quote from: BANE on Apr 30, 2014, 05:14:01 PM
I want Jurassic World to have a woman get eaten.

Because in these movies it's like estrogen scares off dinosaurs or something.

Have I said this before? I don't know.

A woman dies in that movie-video game thing. If that counts.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on Apr 30, 2014, 06:02:50 PM
I didn't think it was terrible, but I much prefer the original.  Its hard for me not to look at The Lost World without nostalgia glasses on.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 30, 2014, 06:02:58 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 30, 2014, 05:15:00 PM
Spoiler

Quote from: Vertigo on Apr 30, 2014, 04:22:44 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 30, 2014, 03:54:04 PM
I'm, eh, just gonna leave this here...


http://www.tor.com/blogs/2013/03/why-doesnt-anyone-like-the-lost-world-jurassic-park (http://www.tor.com/blogs/2013/03/why-doesnt-anyone-like-the-lost-world-jurassic-park)

"The problem with The Lost World is that it eliminates that sense of isolation."

If that's a problem (I'm not sure it is), it's got to be pretty goddamn low on the list. Absence of any sense of wonder, hamfisted writing, awkward pacing, almost exactly the same roster of dinosaurs, bringing back Malcolm only to have him fully-shirted and largely humourless, portraying the animals almost solely as monsters, that slightly nasty tone that pervades right from the girl's attack at the start, losing the message...
I agree with the article that TLW would be better-remembered if it was the first film, and didn't have that towering yardstick of Jurassic Park to live up to, but it's still riddled with issues.

Got to say though, I don't mind Kelly (under the proviso that a child is arbitrary - she's no Eric, at least) or Rexzilla. And there are some pretty damned excellent action sequences.

:edit: More ninjaing :|
[close]
The message definitely wasn't lost. TLW is about animal exploitation and humanity's greed.

Or to put it another way, pillaging vs conservation. The message is there, but it gets lost. Partly because it's bluntly and shallowly conveyed when it does pop up, partly because there's too much else to cram into the running time. Got to spend like ten minutes killing off Dieter Stark, that's some critical storytelling.
And partly because the theme gets muddied. Because we never see any particularly wonderful or inspiring aspect to the dinosaurs (aside from that brief camera pan right at the end), just their insatiable desire to kill all humans, there's no sense that these are things worth protecting. The conservationists are reduced to eco-terrorists who become responsible for lots of deaths. The effects of exploitation on the native environment aren't touched, the only ramification is the escape of solitary rexy (which was avoidable, and is painted with more of a "you tried to control nature and you faiiiiled!" motif).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Apr 30, 2014, 06:06:51 PM
Quote from: Kimarhi on Apr 30, 2014, 06:02:50 PM
I didn't think it was terrible, but I much prefer the original.  Its hard for me not to look at The Lost World without nostalgia glasses on.

The original is awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 30, 2014, 06:07:16 PM
There is a tiny little moment in the film when Sarah talks with one of the vets in charge of the captured T-Rex... and it clearly shows that they arent really up to the task of protecting these animals very well...

aspects like that should have been amplified... and the "conflict" between the harversters vs hunters group should have been better handled.

It's a film that HAD all the materials it needed to be good.... cast, music, director.. even the basic set up is pretty good... and it ended up being a failure. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 30, 2014, 06:10:36 PM
It also had the bad fortune of getting made post-Schindler, when Spielberg was at the height of his "I are srs filmmaker rawr" phase.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Apr 30, 2014, 06:23:05 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 30, 2014, 05:16:37 PM
"It's about humanity's greed/hubris" = it's just another dumb, tired blockbuster with nothing new or interesting to say ;D
Pretty much every movie is that...

Only difference being money put in.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 30, 2014, 06:24:41 PM
most artsy fartsy films dont say anything new regardless of theme.

But if the theme is handled well.. that counts for a lot.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Apr 30, 2014, 06:25:12 PM
Yep.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 30, 2014, 06:36:17 PM
Quote from: BANE on Apr 30, 2014, 06:23:05 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 30, 2014, 05:16:37 PM
"It's about humanity's greed/hubris" = it's just another dumb, tired blockbuster with nothing new or interesting to say ;D
Pretty much every movie is that...

Only difference being money put in.

This is true. And besides it wasn't tired really since the main theme of the movie is surviving dinosaurs. When do we ever get a serious dinosaur movie nowadys?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 30, 2014, 06:38:24 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Apr 30, 2014, 06:36:17 PM
This is true. And besides it wasn't tired really since the main theme of the movie is surviving dinosaurs. When do we ever get a serious dinosaur movie nowadys?
I dunno. You certainly didn't get one with The Lost World.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi60.tinypic.com%2Feb1rox.gif&hash=87da7d37bdf45390e4a95eda42eb10aa2b5404bc)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Apr 30, 2014, 06:41:06 PM
lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Apr 30, 2014, 06:43:41 PM
^ And that was the moment where spielberg thought he was directing an Indiana Jones film instead of a Jurassic Park.. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 30, 2014, 06:44:13 PM
Give her some vines and some monkeys next...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Apr 30, 2014, 06:46:24 PM
Cvalda, you need to just...
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F31.media.tumblr.com%2F529f3bbfbd6a9ad2b892c6c3f4ce0b6d%2Ftumblr_mwb6orTscl1qcga5ro1_500.gif&hash=2c698c817d17717284aecff9f98b646cb4e08fc0)
STOP!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 30, 2014, 06:47:47 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 30, 2014, 06:38:24 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Apr 30, 2014, 06:36:17 PM
This is true. And besides it wasn't tired really since the main theme of the movie is surviving dinosaurs. When do we ever get a serious dinosaur movie nowadys?
I dunno. You certainly didn't get one with The Lost World.
http://i60.tinypic.com/eb1rox.gif

I haf a feeling you would say that. I thought maybe you wouldn't after all, but I gave ya too much credit.

Anyways, any dino movie that isn't Will Ferrell's Land of the Lost can be considered a serious dinosaur movie :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Apr 30, 2014, 06:54:44 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Apr 30, 2014, 06:47:47 PM
any dino movie that isn't Will Ferrell's Land of the Lost can be considered a serious dinosaur movie :P

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fen%2F1%2F1d%2FTheodore-rex-DVD.jpg&hash=a12ad8e1828f97cc8903a497a3ba8cc509f260a2)

Serious dinosaur movie
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Apr 30, 2014, 06:55:59 PM
I must see that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 30, 2014, 07:02:59 PM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Apr 30, 2014, 06:54:44 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Apr 30, 2014, 06:47:47 PM
any dino movie that isn't Will Ferrell's Land of the Lost can be considered a serious dinosaur movie :P

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fen%2F1%2F1d%2FTheodore-rex-DVD.jpg&hash=a12ad8e1828f97cc8903a497a3ba8cc509f260a2)

Serious dinosaur movie

LOL I was expecting a Barney movie but that works too xD
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Apr 30, 2014, 07:37:01 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Apr 30, 2014, 02:52:54 PM
Nah, watch the film again. The Rex infant comes with them in the car and was screaming all the way through their journey back to the trailer. Nick only muzzles the infant after he is already inside the trailer and before Sarah patches up the infant's wound... 

Eddie asks "what the hell was that?" Due to the Rex's screams as Nick and Sarah drive by.

No psychic bond required. Good old fashioned Rex ears hear the scream. :P

The adults were not aware that the infant was missing from the nest until after they returned, indicated by the sudden roar while Ian, Kelly and Eddie are in the high hive, they then made a B line directly to the trailer while the infant was muzzled and sedated.

Perhaps their sense of smell is strong enough to locate it immediately but if that's the case then how did they miss the infant being wounded and used as bait for a period of time to transition from day to night in the  first place? Perhaps the rexes merely picked up the scent trail to the baiting point but that was within a stone's throw of the other camp, surely the rexes would have been aware of them? Anyway, then what? Nick wades through water so there's no trail to follow.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Remonster on Apr 30, 2014, 07:41:18 PM
That makes you question why adult Tyrannosaurs would leave a defenseless infant in the nest by itself.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Apr 30, 2014, 07:45:17 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Apr 30, 2014, 07:41:18 PM
That makes you question why adult Tyrannosaurs would leave a defenseless infant in the nest by itself.

Because no other dinosaurs dare **** with them.

Except spino, which was sipping margaritas on the beach until jpiii
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on Apr 30, 2014, 07:49:51 PM
Almost every animal leaves its babies defenseless at one point or another.  Kind of hard to gather food and what have you if you have to babysit the whole time.

The trexs were probably absorbed hunting at the time and didn't notice the baby being taken.  Then they just used their olfactory senses that they explained were pretty large to follow the wounded baby to where it was being held. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 30, 2014, 07:52:46 PM
Quote from: bloodinthemud on Apr 30, 2014, 07:45:17 PM
Quote from: Remonster on Apr 30, 2014, 07:41:18 PM
That makes you question why adult Tyrannosaurs would leave a defenseless infant in the nest by itself.

Because no other dinosaurs dare **** with them.

Except spino, which was sipping margaritas on the beach until jpiii

:laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 30, 2014, 07:56:38 PM
Nah. Spino was learning neck snaps from Steven Seagal.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 01, 2014, 03:32:06 AM
QuoteGreat morning on my way to set at another location... No matter how early, it's always beautiful... Aloha!

Liu Kang joins Jurassic World

(https://scontent-b-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/t1.0-9/10314705_266645036840864_7427117879511395798_n.jpg)

and from his site:

Brian Tee has added another blockbuster movie to his repertoire, supporting in the upcoming "Jurassic World," from Universal and Amblin Entertainment.

http://www.briantee.com/Site/HOME.html (http://www.briantee.com/Site/HOME.html)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 01, 2014, 04:18:58 AM
Quote from: ace3g on May 01, 2014, 03:32:06 AM
QuoteGreat morning on my way to set at another location... No matter how early, it's always beautiful... Aloha!

Liu Kang joins Jurassic World

(https://scontent-b-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/t1.0-9/10314705_266645036840864_7427117879511395798_n.jpg)

and from his site:

Brian Tee has added another blockbuster movie to his repertoire, supporting in the upcoming "Jurassic World," from Universal and Amblin Entertainment.

http://www.briantee.com/Site/HOME.html (http://www.briantee.com/Site/HOME.html)

Awww sheeeet. Now we know the fates of the dinos in this movie.

Death by bycicle kicks. Bad way to go. Spoiler alert Alien3.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 01, 2014, 05:00:46 AM
Quote from: ace3g on May 01, 2014, 03:32:06 AM
QuoteGreat morning on my way to set at another location... No matter how early, it's always beautiful... Aloha!

Liu Kang joins Jurassic World

(https://scontent-b-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/t1.0-9/10314705_266645036840864_7427117879511395798_n.jpg)

and from his site:

Brian Tee has added another blockbuster movie to his repertoire, supporting in the upcoming "Jurassic World," from Universal and Amblin Entertainment.

http://www.briantee.com/Site/HOME.html (http://www.briantee.com/Site/HOME.html)

Wolverine won't be around to dump him out the f**kin' window this time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 01, 2014, 11:17:27 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Apr 30, 2014, 06:36:17 PM
When do we ever get a serious dinosaur movie nowadys?

I'd say the voiceless version of Walking With Dinosaurs makes a really good case for itself.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 01, 2014, 02:06:47 PM
Bruce Lee in a madafaking JP film. Yusss.

he is most likely gonna be...
Spoiler
Playing the new game warden, Katashi... according to the leaked script pages. That was the one role they were looking for a "badass looking" actor of asian descent, i guess. :P Could end up playing someone completely different of course.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 01, 2014, 06:22:11 PM
I have to admit, as much as I dont care for TLW, the scene where Malcolm gives Ludlow shit as they walk through the rain is awesome. "You know what they say, talent skips a generation. Don't worry, I'm sure your kids will be sharper tacks."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on May 01, 2014, 06:25:43 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on May 01, 2014, 06:22:11 PM
I have to admit, as much as I dont care for TLW, the scene where Malcolm gives Ludlow shit as they walk through the rain is awesome. "You know what they say, talent skips a generation. Don't worry, I'm sure your kids will be sharper tacks."

Roland's speech to Ludlow in the jeep was also awesome.

All you have to do is sign the checks, tell us we're doing a good job, and open your case of scotch when we have a good day. Second condition: my fee? You can keep it. All I want in return for my services is the right to hunt one of the tyrannosaurs. A male, a buck only. How and when is my business. Now if you don't like either of those conditions, you're on your own. So go ahead, set up base camp right here, or in a swamp, or in the middle of a Rex nest for all I care. But I've been on too many safaris with rich dentists to listen to any more suicidal ideas, OK?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 02, 2014, 01:04:33 AM
Spoiler
(https://scontent-b-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/t1.0-9/10299937_734401589937688_3159789395228320079_n.jpg)
(https://scontent-a-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/t1.0-9/q71/s720x720/10322770_10152399028893812_4635198066632459045_n.jpg)


https://www.facebook.com/ReelToursHawaii/photos/pcb.734107443300436/734107269967120/?type=1&permPage=1 (https://www.facebook.com/ReelToursHawaii/photos/pcb.734107443300436/734107269967120/?type=1&permPage=1)

(https://scontent-b-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/t1.0-9/10173573_10202911015248309_5996717742489751663_n.jpg)


https://www.facebook.com/ReelToursHawaii/photos/pcb.734437526600761/734436646600849/?type=1&permPage=1 (https://www.facebook.com/ReelToursHawaii/photos/pcb.734437526600761/734436646600849/?type=1&permPage=1)

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/t1.0-9/q74/s720x720/1610075_734436669934180_8598079728470015885_n.jpg)

[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on May 02, 2014, 01:09:29 AM
Quote from: ace3g on May 02, 2014, 01:04:33 AM
Spoiler
(https://scontent-b-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/t1.0-9/10299937_734401589937688_3159789395228320079_n.jpg)
(https://scontent-a-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/t1.0-9/q71/s720x720/10322770_10152399028893812_4635198066632459045_n.jpg)


https://www.facebook.com/ReelToursHawaii/photos/pcb.734107443300436/734107269967120/?type=1&permPage=1 (https://www.facebook.com/ReelToursHawaii/photos/pcb.734107443300436/734107269967120/?type=1&permPage=1)

(https://scontent-b-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/t1.0-9/10173573_10202911015248309_5996717742489751663_n.jpg)


https://www.facebook.com/ReelToursHawaii/photos/pcb.734437526600761/734436646600849/?type=1&permPage=1 (https://www.facebook.com/ReelToursHawaii/photos/pcb.734437526600761/734436646600849/?type=1&permPage=1)

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/t1.0-9/q74/s720x720/1610075_734436669934180_8598079728470015885_n.jpg)

[close]

Oh my god... :o 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 02, 2014, 01:10:55 AM
Quote from: ace3g on May 02, 2014, 01:04:33 AM
Spoiler
(https://scontent-b-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/t1.0-9/10299937_734401589937688_3159789395228320079_n.jpg)
(https://scontent-a-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/t1.0-9/q71/s720x720/10322770_10152399028893812_4635198066632459045_n.jpg)


https://www.facebook.com/ReelToursHawaii/photos/pcb.734107443300436/734107269967120/?type=1&permPage=1 (https://www.facebook.com/ReelToursHawaii/photos/pcb.734107443300436/734107269967120/?type=1&permPage=1)

(https://scontent-b-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/t1.0-9/10173573_10202911015248309_5996717742489751663_n.jpg)


https://www.facebook.com/ReelToursHawaii/photos/pcb.734437526600761/734436646600849/?type=1&permPage=1 (https://www.facebook.com/ReelToursHawaii/photos/pcb.734437526600761/734436646600849/?type=1&permPage=1)

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/t1.0-9/q74/s720x720/1610075_734436669934180_8598079728470015885_n.jpg)

[close]

Called it. He's a good actor. He should do very well here.  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 02, 2014, 01:15:40 AM
So he's gonna try to act tough in his red underwear again.

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.fandango.com%2Fimages%2Ffandangoblog%2FNoburo723F.jpg&hash=bec438c640b842aebd5f7f37572e7fe527645d2f)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 02, 2014, 01:28:05 AM
Quote from: King Rathalos on May 02, 2014, 01:09:29 AM
Quote from: ace3g on May 02, 2014, 01:04:33 AM
Spoiler
(https://scontent-b-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/t1.0-9/10299937_734401589937688_3159789395228320079_n.jpg)
(https://scontent-a-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/t1.0-9/q71/s720x720/10322770_10152399028893812_4635198066632459045_n.jpg)


https://www.facebook.com/ReelToursHawaii/photos/pcb.734107443300436/734107269967120/?type=1&permPage=1 (https://www.facebook.com/ReelToursHawaii/photos/pcb.734107443300436/734107269967120/?type=1&permPage=1)

(https://scontent-b-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/t1.0-9/10173573_10202911015248309_5996717742489751663_n.jpg)


https://www.facebook.com/ReelToursHawaii/photos/pcb.734437526600761/734436646600849/?type=1&permPage=1 (https://www.facebook.com/ReelToursHawaii/photos/pcb.734437526600761/734436646600849/?type=1&permPage=1)

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/t1.0-9/q74/s720x720/1610075_734436669934180_8598079728470015885_n.jpg)

[close]

Oh my god... :o 8)

That was my exact reaction  :o  :o  :o

DAT SCRIPT PAGE
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on May 02, 2014, 01:46:40 AM
^ Mad love for that Pete Postlethwaite. I miss him.

And that script page, I was actually pretty impressed by it!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 02, 2014, 01:50:17 AM
Where's Pete mentioned?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 02, 2014, 01:51:01 AM
A bit of a repeat of the Muldoon Raptor talk... (game warden saying something about how dangerous one of the dinosaurs can be while they see it from a safe location...) but still pretty damn decent.

I wonder what kind of animal they are talking about.....

C'mahn.. let's see a badass Carnotaurus  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 02, 2014, 02:16:57 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on May 02, 2014, 01:51:01 AM
A bit of a repeat of the Muldoon Raptor talk... (game warden saying something about how dangerous one of the dinosaurs can be while they see it from a safe location...) but still pretty damn decent.

I wonder what kind of animal they are talking about.....

C'mahn.. let's see a badass Carnotaurus  :P

Yeah well lets keep in mind that this is a reboot as well as a sequel so some of that is to be expected  :P

I'd say raptors but it seems too obvious.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on May 02, 2014, 02:18:27 AM
carnotaurus pls
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on May 02, 2014, 02:20:48 AM
wild kimarhi's
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomorphine on May 02, 2014, 02:48:08 AM
Just a wild guess, but I'm pretty sure fresh animal corpses bleed, too, no matter how dead they've been for... I doubt you'd be feeding dinosaurs anything frozen solid.

Isn't raptors, though. It refers to "this animal," singular. The raptors are in packs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 02, 2014, 03:05:18 AM
Yes. Well... who's hungry?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on May 02, 2014, 03:07:31 AM
HAHAHAHAHAHA still more frightening than the raptors in The Lost World
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 02, 2014, 04:11:57 AM
Quote from: Aspie on May 02, 2014, 03:07:31 AM
HAHAHAHAHAHA still more frightening than the raptors in The Lost World

Hey hey hey the movie has it's flaws but those raptors were pretty scary. Part 1 raptors were scarier sure but these were too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on May 02, 2014, 04:42:37 AM
I liked that the Lost World's raptors got to show off dat athleticism in he second one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on May 02, 2014, 05:05:25 AM
Quote from: Kimarhi on May 02, 2014, 04:42:37 AM
I liked that the Lost World's raptors got to show off dat athleticism in he second one.

This.

Mothaf**kas be making 20 foot leaps and flawlessly changing from run to leap and back.

Shit's rad.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on May 02, 2014, 05:09:49 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi60.tinypic.com%2Feb1rox.gif&hash=87da7d37bdf45390e4a95eda42eb10aa2b5404bc)


wow

such terror

much shaking in my boots
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on May 02, 2014, 05:12:16 AM
Aspie has never had a thought that wasn't Cvalda's first.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on May 02, 2014, 05:14:14 AM
The world has a consensus on this scene.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 02, 2014, 05:19:14 AM
Quote from: Kimarhi on May 02, 2014, 04:42:37 AM
I liked that the Lost World's raptors got to show off dat athleticism in he second one.

Yes. Easily my favorite sequence of the movie. Except for, ya know, getting out performed in athleticism by a middle school kid :P

But yeah the whole raptor sequence was great. Most of the movie has set pieces that are very flashy and loud. But you get to the long grass and even though the people are panicking, it feels quiet. I think the score is very low at this point and you basically feel the weight of the silence. And damn those silent killings begin. It's great. Once Malcolm and friends get there it's super quiet. No score either, I believe. At least not until they start running and getting chased. But even there the score is used brillantly and it makes for a very tense encounter. I don't think any other part of the movie gets close to the terror of the raptor sequence.

EDIT: "terror" might seem like an extreme word but couldn't think of another word to place. "tension" didn't sit well with me 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 02, 2014, 11:18:05 AM
Quote from: Xenomorphine on May 02, 2014, 02:48:08 AM
Just a wild guess, but I'm pretty sure fresh animal corpses bleed, too, no matter how dead they've been for... I doubt you'd be feeding dinosaurs anything frozen solid.

Isn't raptors, though. It refers to "this animal," singular. The raptors are in packs.

My guess is that it's somehow hinting this animal reacts to live animals. It creates a sense of urgency in that it becomes more vicious when hunting live prey.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on May 02, 2014, 11:44:39 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Apr 30, 2014, 04:10:04 PMSpeaking of the Gamera trilogy... from Ebert's review of The Lost World:

QuoteThe monster-stepping-on-cars sequences in the current Japanese import "Gamera: Guardian of the Universe'' are more entertaining.

Eh to be fair Ebert's Gamera review is pretty terrible. He "likes" the film like a hipster would.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 02, 2014, 01:41:21 PM
BOOM!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0YMIU8xc50 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0YMIU8xc50)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on May 03, 2014, 04:12:40 AM
The absolute best part of a new JP movie is the new toys we're going to get.

I'm not even exaggerating, I cannot f**king wait for the toyline. The JP and TLW toys were a huge part of my childhood.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on May 03, 2014, 04:26:57 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 02, 2014, 01:41:21 PM
BOOM!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0YMIU8xc50 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0YMIU8xc50)

bruh that's probably you
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on May 03, 2014, 04:28:46 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 02, 2014, 01:41:21 PM
BOOM!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0YMIU8xc50 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0YMIU8xc50)


HAHAHAHAHAHAHA DEM COMMENTS
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 03, 2014, 04:34:12 AM
Oh god... tomorrow i'll do my Jurassic Park 3 rewatch. O.o.

i'm afraid...  :-[
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on May 03, 2014, 04:34:38 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on May 03, 2014, 04:34:12 AM
Oh god... tomorrow i'll do my Jurassic Park 3 rewatch. O.o.

i'm afraid...  :-[

why  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 03, 2014, 04:35:42 AM
ALAN!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6s9sjPzyQjk (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6s9sjPzyQjk)

ALAN!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on May 03, 2014, 04:39:29 AM
RIP 90 minutes of your life, Blabel :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 03, 2014, 04:39:55 AM
 :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 03, 2014, 04:40:09 AM
And yet I still find JP3 to be an easier sit than TLW. Maybe it's the lack of preachy bullshit? Maybe because it doesn't drag on for ages?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on May 03, 2014, 04:41:19 AM
 i like the spinosaurus
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on May 03, 2014, 04:44:37 AM
YOU WOULD.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 03, 2014, 04:45:47 AM
Last time i saw JP3 was when it came out. :P aeons ago. Let's see how it stands up.... (or falls)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 03, 2014, 04:47:12 AM
The weird thing about the Spinosaurus is that the CGI is god tier compared to the animatronic. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on May 03, 2014, 04:53:26 AM
I thought they both looked horrible.

The CG one kept changing size and looked cartoonish, the animatronic one looks like a taxidermy job that can somehow move. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 03, 2014, 04:55:11 AM
Stan Winston was still involved with it.. right?

The hell happened? :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on May 03, 2014, 04:57:58 AM
Too ambitious in size so they had to cut back? :P ???

Or maybe it's just cause JP3 is shit either way and the dinosaurs are rushed just like the movie. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on May 03, 2014, 05:49:56 AM
I didn't mind JP3 other than it felt fifteen minutes too short.  The boat battle at the end wasn't good enough. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 03, 2014, 07:19:44 AM
Quote from: Kimarhi on May 03, 2014, 04:26:57 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 02, 2014, 01:41:21 PM
BOOM!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0YMIU8xc50 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0YMIU8xc50)

bruh that's probably you

Bruh, that is me.

:-*

Quote from: Blacklabel on May 03, 2014, 04:55:11 AM
Stan Winston was still involved with it.. right?

The hell happened? :P

It's all about the lighting.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 03, 2014, 07:32:12 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on May 03, 2014, 04:45:47 AM
Last time i saw JP3 was when it came out. :P aeons ago. Let's see how it stands up.... (or falls)

Eh the movie gets better over time. It's totally brainless but you can have fun with it if you accept that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on May 03, 2014, 07:39:37 AM
InGen Helicopter seen at the set of JW?

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc1/t1.0-9/10255787_733425646701949_3133819036090199696_n.jpg)

http://www.scified.com/site/jurassicworld/ingen-helicopter-spotted-above-jurassic-world-set (http://www.scified.com/site/jurassicworld/ingen-helicopter-spotted-above-jurassic-world-set)

Interesting that they are making another appearance. Wonder whats going to happen between Patel corp and InGen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 03, 2014, 07:51:59 AM
Quote from: Modulok on May 03, 2014, 07:39:37 AM
InGen Helicopter seen at the set of JW?

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc1/t1.0-9/10255787_733425646701949_3133819036090199696_n.jpg)

http://www.scified.com/site/jurassicworld/ingen-helicopter-spotted-above-jurassic-world-set (http://www.scified.com/site/jurassicworld/ingen-helicopter-spotted-above-jurassic-world-set)

Interesting that they are making another appearance. Wonder whats going to happen between Patel corp and InGen.

Already posted a few pages back  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on May 03, 2014, 08:13:03 AM
You guys have probably seen this but I just found it, nostalgia critic's breakdown and review of jurassic park 3d

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_5QNM48Cac (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_5QNM48Cac)

I'm at the part where he first addresses Jeff Goldblum and it's got me in stitches right now  :laugh: ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 03, 2014, 08:30:53 AM
Why anyone finds the NC entertaining is still a mystery to me.

Spoiler
I know he's only acting.
Spoiler
but it is annoying.
Spoiler
yes I'm mad because he "hates" JP & TLW.
Spoiler
He is still a douche.
Spoiler
;D
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on May 03, 2014, 08:38:13 AM
^ lol

nc is a boss.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 03, 2014, 08:47:22 AM
The way he talks about Goldblum, stating something like "we ask ourselves why we even liked his acting"

The same can be said about NC.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on May 03, 2014, 08:59:38 AM
Jeez. Fun police has arrived  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 03, 2014, 09:06:05 AM
Don't trust the police,
No justice, no peace,
They've got me;
face down in the middle of the street.

:-*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on May 03, 2014, 09:07:31 AM
I find that smiley repulsive every time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 03, 2014, 09:18:41 AM
Quote from: bloodinthemud on May 03, 2014, 09:07:31 AM
I find that smiley repulsive every time.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fweknowmemes.com%2Fgenerator%2Fuploads%2Fgenerated%2Fg1366739930720984849.jpg&hash=00c3e2ede3f3889913d3b7e68bac8d75ee65637e)

:-*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 03, 2014, 09:28:54 AM
...No, the Spinosaurus in JP III was all but rushed.

I see nothing wrong with the animatronic or CGI either. Some dodgy shots, sure -- but every Dinosaur from JP that uses CGI has at least one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on May 03, 2014, 09:51:47 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 03, 2014, 09:18:41 AM
Quote from: bloodinthemud on May 03, 2014, 09:07:31 AM
I find that smiley repulsive every time.

http://weknowmemes.com/generator/uploads/generated/g1366739930720984849.jpg

:-*

Well... seeing as you put it that way...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 03, 2014, 12:38:43 PM
(https://fbcdn-photos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/t1.0-0/s600x600/10308739_476862085792662_9017391177185178798_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 03, 2014, 01:13:49 PM
Just started reading the JP novel.

Couldn't put it down.

Up until 3AM.

Motherf**k I love it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on May 03, 2014, 01:15:38 PM
Aye, it's great. Read it twice before and wouldn't mind giving it another go.

inb4CvaldaHatesIt, of course. :-*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on May 03, 2014, 01:19:37 PM
The novel is great. Muldoon and Gennaro are f**king badass. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on May 03, 2014, 02:39:53 PM
Quote from: BANE on May 03, 2014, 01:13:49 PM
Just started reading the JP novel.

Couldn't put it down.

Up until 3AM.

Motherf**k I love it.

They paint the Raptors in that book as inescapable killers. Not hesitating in cool poses and rearing back for 11 seconds to roar before springing into action. And that body count!

BANE, that is probably my most read book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 03, 2014, 02:42:21 PM
I f**king love the novel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 03, 2014, 02:56:16 PM
I never realized the book differed so much from the movie.

Missed opportunities abound.

I wish they'd allowed for an R rating.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on May 03, 2014, 03:02:49 PM
Which is why when they were saying "Reboot" for the next film I was cautiously optimistic for a more faithful adaptation that combated the Spielbergian awe and wonder with gritty realism and a hard PG-13.   

Hell I'm still optimistic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 03, 2014, 03:04:47 PM
I mean, I actually feel bad for Nedry in the book...

And poor Mr. Regis.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on May 03, 2014, 03:09:00 PM
Not to mention that Malcolm dies. And Hammond. And Wu. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on May 03, 2014, 03:09:19 PM
The film is a lot better than the book :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on May 03, 2014, 03:16:38 PM
I like both pretty equally. ASSUMING, of course, we're talking about the originals.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 03, 2014, 03:21:28 PM
Quote from: Laufey on May 03, 2014, 03:09:00 PM
Not to mention that Malcolm dies.
He doesn't.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on May 03, 2014, 03:37:47 PM
Crichton had a nack for researching cutting-edge scientific culture, technology and theory and conveying it in a way that's relatable to the lay reader, to an extent that I've never encountered in any other author or screenwriter. Of course being cutting-edge and theoretical, much of the thinking that went into Jurassic Park has since been rendered obsolete or impossible, but its lasting legacy is that it popularised the dinosaur revolution - the movement that proved them to be active, warm-blooded and sophisticated creatures rather than sluggish evolutionary dead-ends destined for extinction. As such, it's not exaggerating to call it a milestone in our history.

And aside from all the fantastic explanations of theory, which I could latch onto even as a 10-year-old but continue to find riveting and thought-provoking, JP's a hugely suspenseful and evocative thriller, with some brilliant action sequences and deeper themes revolving around the fundamental flaws in scientific culture.
Sure - the characters are mainly just ciphers for the worldview of their profession, and the language is simplistic, but this is missing the point entirely. It's a great book, and I can't stress enough how important it was.

Funny thing though, through both JP and The Lost World, and the handful of interviews I've seen, I never got the impression that Crichton loved dinosaurs. Seemed like he was trying to understand why other people did, and maybe challenge that outlook.

Quote from: BANE on May 03, 2014, 02:56:16 PM
I never realized the book differed so much from the movie.

Missed opportunities abound.

I wish they'd allowed for an R rating.

They're very different beasts really, personally I enjoy them both in different ways. I imagine that if Fox and James Cameron had won the film rights, we'd have seen something much closer to the novel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on May 03, 2014, 03:42:18 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on May 03, 2014, 03:21:28 PM
Quote from: Laufey on May 03, 2014, 03:09:00 PM
Not to mention that Malcolm dies.
He doesn't.

Well ... he was dead from 1990-1995 until he was resurrected for the Lost World book.

When the last survivors were gathered on the helicopter Grant asks about Hammond and is told he didn't make it. Then he asks about Malcolm and the same man shakes his head ... indicating he as well didn't make it.

And flash forward months later to the Epilogue: You'd think if Malcolm had lived and it was just a case of unreliable information that was miss-communicated during a crisis situation  that Grant would have said something to that fact after the dust had settled instead of ... 

Quote"They did not even permit the burial of Hammond or Ian Malcolm" (pg. 398)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on May 03, 2014, 03:44:15 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on May 03, 2014, 03:21:28 PM
Quote from: Laufey on May 03, 2014, 03:09:00 PM
Not to mention that Malcolm dies.

He doesn't.

I know that he was in The Lost World, but wasn't that Crichton bringing him back from the dead once he changed his mind?

Edit: Just saw your post, Bat Chain. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 03, 2014, 03:45:39 PM
Yes, but ultimately he decided against it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on May 03, 2014, 03:48:27 PM
InGen brought him back with Dino DNA.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 03, 2014, 03:55:22 PM
Quote from: Laufey on May 03, 2014, 03:48:27 PM
InGen brought him back with Dino DNA.

More like fly DNA. "This is how Malcolmfly eats." *Pukes up acid*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on May 03, 2014, 03:56:42 PM
I can't be for certain ... but after reading and watching TONS of stuff on everything Jurassic Park ... I can recall Crichton saying that he developed the Ian Malcolm character after himself. That he had no plans to do a sequel. That Spielberg repeatedly encouraged him to write a sequel during the pre-production/production/post-production of Jurassic Park the film. 

He of course decided to go ahead and write the sequel ... but he had to write 'himself' back into the book somehow.

It didn't hurt that the cast Goldblum as Malcolm ... making Malcolm infinitely more cool that Crichton could ever hope to be.  :laugh: And he was a box office draw where as Sam Neill wasn't.

So a combination of money, ego, and Spielbergian influence brought him back.   
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 03, 2014, 04:01:30 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on May 03, 2014, 03:09:19 PM
The film is a lot better than the book :P
Too much science for you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on May 03, 2014, 04:04:58 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on May 03, 2014, 03:56:42 PMIt didn't hurt that the cast Goldblum as Malcolm ... making Malcolm infinitely more cool that Crichton could ever hope to be.  :laugh: And he was a box office draw where as Sam Neill wasn't.

So a combination of money, ego, and Spielbergian influence brought him back.
That guy just can't stay dead. (http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2009/06/30/stephen-colbert-reports-the-untimely-death-of-jeff-goldblum-on-the-colbert-report)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on May 03, 2014, 04:06:02 PM
Quote from: BANE on May 03, 2014, 04:01:30 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on May 03, 2014, 03:09:19 PM
The film is a lot better than the book :P
Too much science for you.
More like too much crappy beach reading plot structure and shoddy writing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 03, 2014, 04:08:40 PM
Shhhh

SHHHHH

SHUT UP
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 03, 2014, 08:57:01 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on May 03, 2014, 04:06:02 PM
Quote from: BANE on May 03, 2014, 04:01:30 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on May 03, 2014, 03:09:19 PM
The film is a lot better than the book :P
Too much science for you.
More like too much crappy beach reading plot structure and shoddy writing.

Credibility. 
Utterly.
Destroyed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on May 03, 2014, 09:17:43 PM
There wasn't enough gay homosex in the book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 03, 2014, 10:33:02 PM
I'd say I like Crichton's writing because he's good at explaining technical/scientific concepts without disappearing up his own ass like Tom Clancy is wont to do.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 04, 2014, 03:25:51 AM
20 minutes into Jurassic Park 3 and i want to punch all the characters not named Alan or Ellie in the face... HARD.
specially Billy... who just feels so f**king lifeless, most of all. :P
These arent even "cardboard" cut out characters... these are "pop ups".. made of the cheapest possible paper. :P

The "parasailing" scene has really terrible special effects and is shot in a really awkward way that just doesnt "sell" at all what's happening onscreen.
:P
The Alan Grant and Ellie character stuff is the only thing here that works as a natural progression of who they were in the first film... but it's damn weird seeing these two good actors trying to work around some really sub par dialogue.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on May 04, 2014, 03:28:28 AM
RIP your braincells. :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on May 04, 2014, 03:29:22 AM
The cellphone ring of doom to signal the proximity of the Spinosaurus. :laugh: :laugh:

I would rather suffocate under a dumptruck load of copies of The Lost World than watch JP3, even though I do love the raptors and am partial to the aviary scene, only because it should've been in JP1.

Any movie where they try and 1-Up the biggest dinosaur with an even bigger dinosaur is built on a firm foundation of dumbass.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 04, 2014, 03:30:00 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on May 04, 2014, 03:28:28 AM
RIP your braincells. :'(

I've survived through a lot of shitty films in your livestreams.

I can handle this.

;D

trololololo

30 minutes in..... they tried to give all the lead characters a kind of "silly charm"... sorta like a lot of the characters in Tremors... and the overall tone of the film is a lot sillier than the first or second films (and those films already had their fair share of humor)...er.. so yeah this sorta feels like the "tremors version of Jurassic Park"...

it really doesnt work.
I dont mind the slight change in tone.. there's been sequels to good films that had a different tone to it and managed to also be great films on their own.. ex: the gritty realism of Alien into the "hollywood action film" of Aliens complete with badass one liners.

The problem here is that the different tone is handled poorly. The "jokes" dont really work. The stupid characters are more annoying than anything.

le sigh.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on May 04, 2014, 04:07:38 AM
lol, this turning into an...
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ApocalypticLog (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ApocalypticLog)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on May 04, 2014, 04:12:27 AM
Blacklabel gets eaten before he can finish, someone finds his letter with blood stains caused by a dinosaur attack, blood covers the warning telling people not to bother with the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on May 04, 2014, 04:14:44 AM
I have seriously seen better Syfy originals than JP3


featuring dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on May 04, 2014, 04:15:11 AM
Raptor Island for the win 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 04, 2014, 04:16:56 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on May 04, 2014, 04:07:38 AM
lol, this turning into an...
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ApocalypticLog (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ApocalypticLog)

But is he going to keep writing as he dies? :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on May 04, 2014, 04:17:50 AM
Quote from: Aspie on May 04, 2014, 04:14:44 AM
I have seriously seen better Syfy originals than JP3


featuring dinosaurs.
Not to sure about that one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on May 04, 2014, 04:24:17 AM
raptor island
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on May 04, 2014, 04:26:33 AM
I remember watching that back when it aired :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on May 04, 2014, 04:30:42 AM
Quote from: Aspie on May 04, 2014, 04:24:17 AM
raptor island
Your opinion on any form of entertainment is highly questionable.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 04, 2014, 04:36:17 AM
....45 minutes in and some of the animatronic raptors can be seen doing their best "robot" dance moves. :P

lifelike as f**k.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on May 04, 2014, 04:40:01 AM
Are you watching the movie on slowmo or something? :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on May 04, 2014, 04:41:26 AM
JP3 is better than the lost world.  Real talk.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on May 04, 2014, 04:42:32 AM
1) No.
2) That wouldn't be much of an accomplishment anyway.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on May 04, 2014, 04:45:08 AM
Negatron megatron.  JP3 superior to TLW. 


TLW has Hispanics getting stepped on, Raptors eating the black man, the fat blue collar working man gets bitten in half.  Its class warfare.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 04, 2014, 04:57:50 AM
JP3 is better paced than the lost world...

but the lost world is better directed... and the characters arent AS annoying.. plus it has Roland, kicking ass. :P

Quote from: Cvalda on May 04, 2014, 04:40:01 AM
Are you watching the movie on slowmo or something? :P

Pausing every now and then because the desire to keep watching is dropping.. :P lol

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on May 04, 2014, 04:59:49 AM
roland was aight
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 04, 2014, 06:49:42 AM
Done with it.

The Spinosaurus shat a phone/10 (5.5/10)

The scene at the river was "almost" amazing..... because, god damn that was the worst child ever... and it just made the scene laughable instead of getting me to laugh "along with" it. :P

The Aviary scene was actually pretty good...

and
...this film could actually have been "fun"... if we actually gave a f**k about these characters... and if the humor in the film was actually decent... and if the attempts at having a "heart" werent so poorly executed.

the only character bit that i truly liked was Grant asking the kid about what he thought of Malcolm's book and the self satisfied goofy smile he gave when he heard the answer.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 04, 2014, 09:18:06 AM
Quote from: Kimarhi on May 04, 2014, 04:41:26 AM
JP3 is better than the lost world.

Quote from: Kimarhi on May 04, 2014, 04:45:08 AM
JP3 superior to TLW. 

Quote from: Blacklabel on May 04, 2014, 04:57:50 AM
JP3 is better paced than the lost world...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2FFkvbkR3fhTisU%2Fgiphy.gif&hash=412c4040869675a41d40e6f4e20f8d31a47213e7)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 04, 2014, 09:53:55 AM
TLW shits on JP3.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 04, 2014, 01:31:07 PM
Hey, this is now a totally anti-JP film free environment.  You don't like a JP film?  SEE YO SELF OUT!  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 04, 2014, 01:54:37 PM
So I finished the JP novel and am onto TLW.

So far it's a hell of a lot different from the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 04, 2014, 02:31:15 PM
Jurassic Park - Diamond
The Lost World - Pyrite.
Jurassic Park 3 - Turd.
Jurassic World - ?? 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on May 04, 2014, 02:54:30 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on May 04, 2014, 09:53:55 AM
TLW shits on JP3.

A-greed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on May 04, 2014, 04:02:27 PM
Quote from: BANE on May 04, 2014, 01:54:37 PM
So I finished the JP novel and am onto TLW.

So far it's a hell of a lot different from the movie.

They have virtually nothing in common. The main carry-over, unfortunately, is Malcolm's personality dump.
One thing that particularly annoys me about TLW, over half the book is spent on the low-rent mystery puzzle that leads them to the island. The meaty stuff is just a few hours' read.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on May 04, 2014, 05:03:25 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 04, 2014, 09:18:06 AM
Quote from: Kimarhi on May 04, 2014, 04:41:26 AM
JP3 is better than the lost world.

Quote from: Kimarhi on May 04, 2014, 04:45:08 AM
JP3 superior to TLW. 

Quote from: Blacklabel on May 04, 2014, 04:57:50 AM
JP3 is better paced than the lost world...

http://media.giphy.com/media/FkvbkR3fhTisU/giphy.gif

Clearly yalls taste in moves is broken.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 04, 2014, 05:05:19 PM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on May 04, 2014, 02:54:30 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on May 04, 2014, 09:53:55 AM
TLW shits on JP3.

A-greed.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vgmemes.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F06%2Fnostalgia-goggles.png&hash=805027b3ceb7cbd41c35cef7d851546df2816788)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on May 04, 2014, 05:05:53 PM
Both are shit. JP3 just smells better.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 04, 2014, 05:06:30 PM
Quote from: Aspie on May 04, 2014, 05:05:53 PM
Both are shit. JP3 just smells better.
Shush.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 04, 2014, 06:01:51 PM
Quote from: Aspie on May 04, 2014, 05:05:53 PM
Both are shit. JP3 just smells better.

Quote from: Aspie on May 04, 2014, 05:05:53 PM
JP3 just smells better.

Quote from: Aspie on May 04, 2014, 05:05:53 PM
JP3 just smells

Quote from: Aspie on May 04, 2014, 05:05:53 PM
JP3 smells

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_lh7tzibpI61qc489fo1_500.png&hash=2c4c04c7262dac96ce91ffeb2038e9226d01cd7f)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 04, 2014, 06:29:03 PM
If that's a screencap from the movie I can see a fold in the green screen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on May 04, 2014, 09:37:55 PM
Sadly that's from Jurassic Park III. FFS why couldn't William H. Macy die. f**king annoying twat. The whole family really.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 04, 2014, 09:43:57 PM
They were aiming for a "aww what a lovable shmuck" vibe. :P It didnt work.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 04, 2014, 09:45:13 PM
Yeah, but at least he got to shoot flares at the spino like a badass... or am I remembering that wrong?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on May 04, 2014, 09:45:57 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on May 04, 2014, 09:45:13 PM
Yeah, but at least he got to shoot flares at the spino like a badass... or am I remembering that wrong?

That was Grant. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 04, 2014, 09:46:40 PM
Quote from: First Blood on May 04, 2014, 09:45:57 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on May 04, 2014, 09:45:13 PM
Yeah, but at least he got to shoot flares at the spino like a badass... or am I remembering that wrong?

That was Grant. 8)

ALAN
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on May 04, 2014, 09:48:02 PM
 :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 04, 2014, 09:49:37 PM
Kirby distracted the Spinosaurus by going up the crane, allowing his wife, son and Grant time to escape.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on May 04, 2014, 09:53:16 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on May 04, 2014, 05:05:19 PM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on May 04, 2014, 02:54:30 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on May 04, 2014, 09:53:55 AM
TLW shits on JP3.

A-greed.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vgmemes.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F06%2Fnostalgia-goggles.png&hash=805027b3ceb7cbd41c35cef7d851546df2816788)

TLW is at least twice as good as JP3.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on May 04, 2014, 09:56:27 PM
Quote from: BANE on May 04, 2014, 06:29:03 PM
If that's a screencap from the movie I can see a fold in the green screen.

Oh fuuuuuuck, I see it... :o :-X :-X :-X
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 04, 2014, 10:25:30 PM
Quote from: First Blood on May 04, 2014, 09:37:55 PM
Sadly that's from Jurassic Park III. FFS why couldn't William H. Macy die. f**king annoying twat. The whole family really.

He was originally supposed to die.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 05, 2014, 12:35:37 AM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/t1.0-9/10289798_735477323163448_4196797340826099624_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 05, 2014, 12:53:05 AM
If I were the gamewarden on Jurassic Park I'd have about 50 of those chain-mail suits people wear when feeding sharks.

Just to put on in case of emergency.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on May 05, 2014, 01:19:53 AM
Quote from: BANE on May 05, 2014, 12:53:05 AM
If I were the gamewarden on Jurassic Park I'd have about 50 of those chain-mail suits people wear when feeding sharks.

Just to put on in case of emergency.

What about the bone-crushing capability of dinosaur bites?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 05, 2014, 01:51:03 AM
eff that shit... let's get some grenade launchers to use on rogue dinos. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 05, 2014, 01:54:39 AM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on May 05, 2014, 01:19:53 AM
Quote from: BANE on May 05, 2014, 12:53:05 AM
If I were the gamewarden on Jurassic Park I'd have about 50 of those chain-mail suits people wear when feeding sharks.

Just to put on in case of emergency.

What about the bone-crushing capability of dinosaur bites?
I'm more concerned with raptors than tyrannosaurs.

If a tyrannosaur is chasing me down I'll just blow it up with one of my many rocket launchers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 05, 2014, 03:46:37 AM
Quote from: BANE on May 05, 2014, 01:54:39 AM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on May 05, 2014, 01:19:53 AM
Quote from: BANE on May 05, 2014, 12:53:05 AM
If I were the gamewarden on Jurassic Park I'd have about 50 of those chain-mail suits people wear when feeding sharks.

Just to put on in case of emergency.

What about the bone-crushing capability of dinosaur bites?
I'm more concerned with raptors than tyrannosaurs.

If a tyrannosaur is chasing me down I'll just blow it up with one of my many rocket launchers.

Rockets only knock them out, if I'm remembering the book correctly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 05, 2014, 03:50:22 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on May 05, 2014, 03:46:37 AM
Quote from: BANE on May 05, 2014, 01:54:39 AM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on May 05, 2014, 01:19:53 AM
Quote from: BANE on May 05, 2014, 12:53:05 AM
If I were the gamewarden on Jurassic Park I'd have about 50 of those chain-mail suits people wear when feeding sharks.

Just to put on in case of emergency.

What about the bone-crushing capability of dinosaur bites?
I'm more concerned with raptors than tyrannosaurs.

If a tyrannosaur is chasing me down I'll just blow it up with one of my many rocket launchers.

Rockets only knock them out, if I'm remembering the book correctly.

One of Muldoon's grenade launchers blew off a raptor's foot.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on May 05, 2014, 07:14:38 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on May 05, 2014, 03:50:22 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on May 05, 2014, 03:46:37 AM
Quote from: BANE on May 05, 2014, 01:54:39 AM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on May 05, 2014, 01:19:53 AM
Quote from: BANE on May 05, 2014, 12:53:05 AM
If I were the gamewarden on Jurassic Park I'd have about 50 of those chain-mail suits people wear when feeding sharks.

Just to put on in case of emergency.

What about the bone-crushing capability of dinosaur bites?
I'm more concerned with raptors than tyrannosaurs.

If a tyrannosaur is chasing me down I'll just blow it up with one of my many rocket launchers.

Rockets only knock them out, if I'm remembering the book correctly.

One of Muldoon's grenade launchers blew off a raptor's foot.

Didn't he splatter a raptor against a wall like a tomato with his grenade launcher when Arnold got cornered?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on May 05, 2014, 07:47:43 AM
It was a rocket launcher, and yes he blew the shit out of that one when they had Arnold cornered.

He also blew the leg off another one and god knows how many before spraining his ankle on that hill and crawling into that pipe. Drunk bastard. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on May 05, 2014, 08:03:23 AM
Raptor bite force probably wasn't anything to be sneezed at either. The latest studies indicate Deinonychus had power on par with an alligator.
And if we're just going by Jurassic Park, they did chew through several-inch solid metal bars...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on May 05, 2014, 08:35:50 AM
Ah crap! If you can grow dinosaurs then surely you can invent phase plasma pulse rifles.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on May 05, 2014, 10:45:51 AM
 
Quote from: RagingDragon on May 05, 2014, 07:47:43 AM
It was a rocket launcher, and yes he blew the shit out of that one when they had Arnold cornered.

He also blew the leg off another one and god knows how many before spraining his ankle on that hill and crawling into that pipe. Drunk bastard. :laugh:

lmfao :D

I can just imagine them using that somehow in the jurassic world movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 05, 2014, 11:12:27 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on May 05, 2014, 08:03:23 AM
Raptor bite force probably wasn't anything to be sneezed at either. The latest studies indicate Deinonychus had power on par with an alligator.
And if we're just going by Jurassic Park, they did chew through several-inch solid metal bars...

Seriously? Wow, I'd love to read more. Links handy?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 05, 2014, 12:36:30 PM
Quote from: RagingDragon on May 05, 2014, 07:47:43 AM
It was a rocket launcher, and yes he blew the shit out of that one when they had Arnold cornered.

He also blew the leg off another one and god knows how many before spraining his ankle on that hill and crawling into that pipe. Drunk bastard. :laugh:

I wish we had gotten Muldoon in all his glory  :'(

It would be great if they took a page out of JP3 and adapted some scenes still left in the books. Except with the new Warden of course. Dat Muldoon/Genarro T-rex hunting scene  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on May 05, 2014, 01:25:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 05, 2014, 11:12:27 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on May 05, 2014, 08:03:23 AM
Raptor bite force probably wasn't anything to be sneezed at either. The latest studies indicate Deinonychus had power on par with an alligator.
And if we're just going by Jurassic Park, they did chew through several-inch solid metal bars...

Seriously? Wow, I'd love to read more. Links handy?

http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/40864394?uid=3738032&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&sid=21104111702323 (http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/40864394?uid=3738032&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&sid=21104111702323)

It's based on actual tooth marks on a bone, so it's probably fairly accurate (assuming it is in fact a dromie bite, which they seem pretty confident about). The effects of a bite would be very different to a crocodylian though, given the tooth shape - croc teeth are designed for gripping slippery fish and pinning large animals in place while they roll and drag, Deinonychus teeth are designed for ripping meat away.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 05, 2014, 01:44:47 PM
I won't be purchasing the article at this time, but does this mean Deinonychus could crush bones?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 05, 2014, 01:57:54 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on May 05, 2014, 01:25:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 05, 2014, 11:12:27 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on May 05, 2014, 08:03:23 AM
Raptor bite force probably wasn't anything to be sneezed at either. The latest studies indicate Deinonychus had power on par with an alligator.
And if we're just going by Jurassic Park, they did chew through several-inch solid metal bars...

Seriously? Wow, I'd love to read more. Links handy?

http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/40864394?uid=3738032&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&sid=21104111702323 (http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/40864394?uid=3738032&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&sid=21104111702323)

It's based on actual tooth marks on a bone, so it's probably fairly accurate (assuming it is in fact a dromie bite, which they seem pretty confident about). The effects of a bite would be very different to a crocodylian though, given the tooth shape - croc teeth are designed for gripping slippery fish and pinning large animals in place while they roll and drag, Deinonychus teeth are designed for ripping meat away.

So if this is true, if a raptor bit your arm it could snap it in two pretty easily right? With that bite force and sharp teeth it sounds easy to me. My knowledge in this area isn't much though so I'm mostly speculating.

I keep imagining a dog biting a long carrot and splitting it into 3 pieces  :P I'm probably not even close  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 05, 2014, 02:17:58 PM
Wouldn't you guys like to see the paralysis gas grenade (used in TLW novel on the raptors) used in JW?  That scene would be pretty nail-bitting to watch.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on May 05, 2014, 05:53:55 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 05, 2014, 01:44:47 PM
I won't be purchasing the article at this time, but does this mean Deinonychus could crush bones?

No, that wasn't part of its feeding strategy - we find fairly few toothmarks from dromies on the bones of their prey. You can tell from the teeth, as they aren't designed to bear downwards with great concentration of force like a tyrannosaurid tooth - they're fairly short, curved backwards, with serrations along both edges, and closely packed in the tooth bed. If they used their jaws for killing, it would have been to deliver high-tissue-damage bites, using the high bite force to penetrate the teeth deeply, then with the curved and serrated edges they'd have little resistance as they jerked their heads back and tore off a chunk of meat.

When it came to feeding, dromies were probably too slight to have a digestive tract capable of dealing with bone. They'd have stripped meat off the carcass, rather than just gulping down as much as they could fit in their mouths, rex-style.

Quote from: xeno-kaname on May 05, 2014, 01:57:54 PMSo if this is true, if a raptor bit your arm it could snap it in two pretty easily right? With that bite force and sharp teeth it sounds easy to me. My knowledge in this area isn't much though so I'm mostly speculating.

I keep imagining a dog biting a long carrot and splitting it into 3 pieces  :P I'm probably not even close  :laugh:

Well, I'm not sure what the effect is from an alligator biting an arm, but it should do more crushing damage than what a similar-sized raptor would (to give you some idea). An alligator's thick, straight teeth are shaped in such a way that the force of the bite is concentrated downwards, while a Deinonychus' teeth angle the force backwards in more of a stripping motion. I'd imagine they wouldn't break your arm but would sheer right through your skin and scratch the bone - those jaws were adapted for tackling the thick scaly skin of large dinosaurs, rather than soft bony mammals like ourselves.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 05, 2014, 07:57:05 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on May 05, 2014, 05:53:55 PM
No, that wasn't part of its feeding strategy - we find fairly few toothmarks from dromies on the bones of their prey. You can tell from the teeth, as they aren't designed to bear downwards with great concentration of force like a tyrannosaurid tooth - they're fairly short, curved backwards, with serrations along both edges, and closely packed in the tooth bed. If they used their jaws for killing, it would have been to deliver high-tissue-damage bites, using the high bite force to penetrate the teeth deeply, then with the curved and serrated edges they'd have little resistance as they jerked their heads back and tore off a chunk of meat.

Sounds like a mini-me carnosaur feeding tactic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 05, 2014, 08:26:17 PM
I'm not worried about a raptor biting me I'm worried about the claws.

I can punch a raptor in the face if need be. I can't do much against those foot swords.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 05, 2014, 08:26:51 PM
They attack from sides. *woosh*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 05, 2014, 08:28:13 PM
Well obviously I'm going to have my wits about me.

I swing around and clock that bitch in the nose before it even knew what hit it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on May 05, 2014, 08:38:27 PM
Try to show a little respect.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 05, 2014, 08:41:47 PM
Quote from: First Blood on May 05, 2014, 08:38:27 PM
Try to show a little respect.

Clever girl.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 05, 2014, 09:52:24 PM
Quote from: BANE on May 05, 2014, 08:26:17 PM
I'm not worried about a raptor biting me I'm worried about the claws.

I can punch a raptor in the face if need be. I can't do much against those foot swords.

Uh huh.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 05, 2014, 09:54:07 PM
Gimme a break DoomRulz. They jump claws first.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 05, 2014, 09:54:38 PM
Well, I'm sure Tembo could take out a raptor with a punch.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 05, 2014, 09:56:12 PM
As long as Van Owen didn't f**k around with his fists.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 05, 2014, 09:57:11 PM
Quote from: BANE on May 05, 2014, 09:54:07 PM
Gimme a break DoomRulz. They jump claws first.

Not necessarily. I don't know of any study of dromaeosaurid hunting behaviour (Vertigo?) but I think it's safe to say they would swarm you before you knew how to react.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 05, 2014, 10:02:59 PM
This is a one on one scenario DoomRulz.

If there were any chance of me being swarmed I wouldn't be anywhere near that spot unless I had an automatic rifle.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenodog on May 05, 2014, 10:07:57 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on May 05, 2014, 05:53:55 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 05, 2014, 01:44:47 PM
I won't be purchasing the article at this time, but does this mean Deinonychus could crush bones?

No, that wasn't part of its feeding strategy - we find fairly few toothmarks from dromies on the bones of their prey. You can tell from the teeth, as they aren't designed to bear downwards with great concentration of force like a tyrannosaurid tooth - they're fairly short, curved backwards, with serrations along both edges, and closely packed in the tooth bed. If they used their jaws for killing, it would have been to deliver high-tissue-damage bites, using the high bite force to penetrate the teeth deeply, then with the curved and serrated edges they'd have little resistance as they jerked their heads back and tore off a chunk of meat.

When it came to feeding, dromies were probably too slight to have a digestive tract capable of dealing with bone. They'd have stripped meat off the carcass, rather than just gulping down as much as they could fit in their mouths, rex-style.

Quote from: xeno-kaname on May 05, 2014, 01:57:54 PMSo if this is true, if a raptor bit your arm it could snap it in two pretty easily right? With that bite force and sharp teeth it sounds easy to me. My knowledge in this area isn't much though so I'm mostly speculating.

I keep imagining a dog biting a long carrot and splitting it into 3 pieces  :P I'm probably not even close  :laugh:

Well, I'm not sure what the effect is from an alligator biting an arm, but it should do more crushing damage than what a similar-sized raptor would (to give you some idea). An alligator's thick, straight teeth are shaped in such a way that the force of the bite is concentrated downwards, while a Deinonychus' teeth angle the force backwards in more of a stripping motion. I'd imagine they wouldn't break your arm but would sheer right through your skin and scratch the bone - those jaws were adapted for tackling the thick scaly skin of large dinosaurs, rather than soft bony mammals like ourselves.

Similarly power to crush bone doesn't mean it will be used in hunting. Modern predators, especially hyaenas, can crunch and eat bone but rarely break any in hunting prey.
May be used in fights with rivals though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on May 05, 2014, 10:09:15 PM
Quote from: BANE on May 05, 2014, 08:26:17 PM
I'm not worried about a raptor biting me I'm worried about the claws.

I can punch a raptor in the face if need be. I can't do much against those foot swords.

You saw how quickly the one overpowered Muldoon and knocked him to the ground right? I think you're underestimating the animal's strength.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on May 05, 2014, 10:55:10 PM
Quote from: BANE on May 05, 2014, 08:26:17 PM
I'm not worried about a raptor biting me I'm worried about the claws.

I can punch a raptor in the face if need be. I can't do much against those foot swords.

It's not clear exactly what they used the toe claw for. They originally evolved for tree climbing in more basal animals, and Deinonychus very likely used them for clinging on to large prey.

They probably functioned as a more direct weapon too, the fossil of Velociraptor and Protoceratops locked in combat seems to show the dromie kicking or latched on to the ceratopsian's throat. The surprisingly stocky legs of dromaeosaurids also suggests a design intended to reduce leg stress. But, in a study of numerous foot bones from a wide array of dromie species, no evidence of stress was found, at all.
And the thing is, when you look at what a nasty bite they had, that may have been all the weaponry they needed. If you tried to punch it in the face, odds are you'd be losing that hand.


Quote from: DoomRulz on May 05, 2014, 09:57:11 PMNot necessarily. I don't know of any study of dromaeosaurid hunting behaviour (Vertigo?) but I think it's safe to say they would swarm you before you knew how to react.

Unfortunately, their predatory behaviour is still very mysterious - it would take a freak set of footprints to clear up the issue.
Deinonychus is the only dromie suggested to be social, and given that the hippo-sized Tenontosaurus was top of its menu, it must have been a pack hunter too. It would take around ten Deinonychus to match the weight of a subadult Tenontosaurus, so 'swarm' sounds like the operative word.
They weren't particularly fast, but their light build suggests very high energy, so I imagine they'd tire out the prey over a long chase like today's wolves. At which point, I think they'd jump on it and pull it down through weight of numbers, clinging on with those toe claws, while repeatedly biting it.

If the toe claw did function as a weapon, I'd guess that one Deinonychus would try to take a kick at the prey's throat while the others weighed it down - similarly to a lion hunt, in which one predator goes for the choke hold while the others keep the prey subdued.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on May 06, 2014, 12:30:48 AM
People who always wonder why the characters in these movies never try to shoot the dinosaurs, or why guns don't hurt them; well you now have your answer.

Spoiler
(https://31.media.tumblr.com/83e855d38719099d9d529bfb4ee9ad90/tumblr_n4fy3trp5k1qep5zro1_500.jpg)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on May 06, 2014, 12:50:36 AM
Bullshit, blast it with a tank gun and it'll be down in one hit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 06, 2014, 01:20:51 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on May 05, 2014, 10:55:10 PM
If the toe claw did function as a weapon, I'd guess that one Deinonychus would try to take a kick at the prey's throat while the others weighed it down - similarly to a lion hunt, in which one predator goes for the choke hold while the others keep the prey subdued.

There's evidence which shows the claw of Velociraptor acted more like a puncturing device rather than slashing blade, used to puncture holes in its prey's airway while bringing it down. It's possible Deinonychus was the same way but a larger claw for him might have meant better slashing abilities.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on May 06, 2014, 03:13:43 AM
Quote from: King Rathalos on May 06, 2014, 12:30:48 AM
People who always wonder why the characters in these movies never try to shoot the dinosaurs, or why guns don't hurt them; well you now have your answer.

Spoiler
(https://31.media.tumblr.com/83e855d38719099d9d529bfb4ee9ad90/tumblr_n4fy3trp5k1qep5zro1_500.jpg)
[close]

I'm sure after a while bullets would do something to them... right.. ? oh god.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 06, 2014, 03:19:23 AM
Quote from: MudButt on May 06, 2014, 03:13:43 AM
Quote from: King Rathalos on May 06, 2014, 12:30:48 AM
People who always wonder why the characters in these movies never try to shoot the dinosaurs, or why guns don't hurt them; well you now have your answer.

Spoiler
(https://31.media.tumblr.com/83e855d38719099d9d529bfb4ee9ad90/tumblr_n4fy3trp5k1qep5zro1_500.jpg)
[close]

I'm sure after a while bullets would do something to them... right.. ? oh god.

Maybe arrows.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 06, 2014, 03:20:31 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 06, 2014, 03:19:23 AM
Quote from: MudButt on May 06, 2014, 03:13:43 AM
Quote from: King Rathalos on May 06, 2014, 12:30:48 AM
People who always wonder why the characters in these movies never try to shoot the dinosaurs, or why guns don't hurt them; well you now have your answer.

Spoiler
(https://31.media.tumblr.com/83e855d38719099d9d529bfb4ee9ad90/tumblr_n4fy3trp5k1qep5zro1_500.jpg)
[close]

I'm sure after a while bullets would do something to them... right.. ? oh god.

Maybe arrows.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-ZMfKWCTqxsY%2FUHx4YIKfuXI%2FAAAAAAAAAFY%2FuDgE0UQXEB0%2Fs400%2Fgreen%2Barrow%2Bboxing%2Bglove.png&hash=9ba2252b2b69f0e4f693d6927ee5f5906d8a2107)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on May 06, 2014, 03:23:37 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 06, 2014, 03:19:23 AM
Quote from: MudButt on May 06, 2014, 03:13:43 AM
Quote from: King Rathalos on May 06, 2014, 12:30:48 AM
People who always wonder why the characters in these movies never try to shoot the dinosaurs, or why guns don't hurt them; well you now have your answer.

Spoiler
(https://31.media.tumblr.com/83e855d38719099d9d529bfb4ee9ad90/tumblr_n4fy3trp5k1qep5zro1_500.jpg)
[close]

I'm sure after a while bullets would do something to them... right.. ? oh god.

Maybe arrows.

mah negroe *bro fist*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 06, 2014, 04:27:55 AM
Alan straight up kills two raptors in the book and Muldoon takes down some others as well. I wonder why they don't really show dinosaurs die often. As far as people actually killing one, I think only Kelly's ridiculous scene may count. Do they think audiences will feel more bad for the dinosaurs than the humans, as is usually the case with dogs and other animals in movies?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 06, 2014, 04:36:58 AM
Eh, you don't see anyone feeling bad for the shark in Jaws. Don't see why it should be any different with the dinos.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on May 06, 2014, 07:42:35 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 06, 2014, 01:20:51 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on May 05, 2014, 10:55:10 PM
If the toe claw did function as a weapon, I'd guess that one Deinonychus would try to take a kick at the prey's throat while the others weighed it down - similarly to a lion hunt, in which one predator goes for the choke hold while the others keep the prey subdued.

There's evidence which shows the claw of Velociraptor acted more like a puncturing device rather than slashing blade, used to puncture holes in its prey's airway while bringing it down. It's possible Deinonychus was the same way but a larger claw for him might have meant better slashing abilities.

I was going to bring that up, but in my opinion that study's based on flawed findings. For starters, it's based on estimates of their muscle function and strength, which is always extremely tenuous in dinosaurs. Deinonychus had previously been thought to have a very weak bite based on reconstructions of their jaw muscles, but actual physical tooth-on-bone evidence showed the opposite was true - that's just one example.
Secondly, dromaeosaurid claws would have been very different in life. All that's fossilised is the bony core, but they would have been surrounded by a large keratin sheath. In some species this would have doubled the length of the claw, and there may have been extra details to them, such as serrations or fine edges to make them more effective for slashing, or lode-bearing thickness to aid climbing.

One interesting fact is that killing claw shape was highly variable in dromies - some were more hook-like, others were straightened and more knife-like. In Deinonychus' case, this even varied within members of the same genus.

But yeah, assuming the claws were weapons, I'd guess they were puncturing tools delivered by a kick. Cassowaries still do something similar, and their claws aren't nearly as nasty as dromies'.

Quote from: KiramidHead on May 06, 2014, 04:36:58 AM
Eh, you don't see anyone feeling bad for the shark in Jaws.

I do. :/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 06, 2014, 07:49:10 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on May 06, 2014, 07:42:35 AM

Quote from: KiramidHead on May 06, 2014, 04:36:58 AM
Eh, you don't see anyone feeling bad for the shark in Jaws.

I do. :/

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_m6m8akw1EP1qfr6udo6_400.gif&hash=e8d3d22706758edbf49cc2c43146ef4b0076dd0d)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on May 06, 2014, 07:52:59 AM
What? It's cute. It just needs a cuddle. It's crabby because people don't love it enough.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 06, 2014, 07:55:11 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on May 06, 2014, 07:52:59 AM
What? It's cute. It just needs a cuddle. It's crabby because people don't love it enough.

Farewell and ado, to ye fair Spanish ladies...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 06, 2014, 11:03:41 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on May 06, 2014, 07:52:59 AM
What? It's cute. It just needs a cuddle. It's crabby because people don't love it enough.

He'll give you one hell of a love bite.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on May 06, 2014, 11:51:03 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.dailymail.co.uk%2Fi%2Fpix%2F2013%2F08%2F13%2Farticle-2391373-1B4530A1000005DC-317_964x709.jpg&hash=c622bac8da478948651521e8dd0c5e3791a40ebd)

See? All they want is strokies.
I'd like to imagine that they'd purr if they had vocal apparatus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 06, 2014, 02:44:23 PM
Sam Neill: I had no choice about Jurassic Park IV

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501119&objectid=11250568 (http://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501119&objectid=11250568)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 06, 2014, 03:01:35 PM
Interesting. I wonder if there was a fallout between him and the studio.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 06, 2014, 03:15:44 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 06, 2014, 03:01:35 PM
Interesting. I wonder if there was a fallout between him and the studio.

I think the script just didn't call for his character. They have said this is a reboot even though it's still after the JP trilogy. They probably don't want to depend on actors from the previous films to sell the movie. Fresh start.

If the movie is successful though and they go ahead with a new trilogy, I think they will at least be asked to cameo for the last movie or something.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 06, 2014, 03:42:20 PM
It's a shame Richard Attenborough is unable to work on a set anymore. I would have liked to have maybe a media piece in the film about his (Hammond's) thoughts on the new park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on May 06, 2014, 03:48:50 PM
I'd be more receptive to Hammond than Grant.

And I love Sam Neill's Dr. Grant, I really do, I just think it would be stretching it after JP3. I mean the guy doesn't want to go back near the islands. Stop having him end up on the f**king islands. :laugh:

Was bad enough they got Tea Layohme to seduce him there in the third one lol.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 06, 2014, 03:53:23 PM
What, you don't want to see the Dinosaur Man come back? :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 06, 2014, 04:15:03 PM
Quote from: RagingDragon on May 06, 2014, 03:48:50 PM
I'd be more receptive to Hammond than Grant.

And I love Sam Neill's Dr. Grant, I really do, I just think it would be stretching it after JP3. I mean the guy doesn't want to go back near the islands. Stop having him end up on the f**king islands. :laugh:

Was bad enough they got Tea Layohme to seduce him there in the third one lol.
Personally if I were Dr. Grant and I had this thing:
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimagehost.epier.com%2F129077%2Fresonating-chamber%282%29.jpg&hash=e26d60625de04faf9bf0a6f951dd11244e221885)
I'd be sneaking around Ellie's house making raptor noises in the night, scaring the shit out of her.

But thankfully I'm not Dr. Grant.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on May 06, 2014, 07:27:10 PM
Quote from: BANE on May 06, 2014, 04:15:03 PM
Quote from: RagingDragon on May 06, 2014, 03:48:50 PM
I'd be more receptive to Hammond than Grant.

And I love Sam Neill's Dr. Grant, I really do, I just think it would be stretching it after JP3. I mean the guy doesn't want to go back near the islands. Stop having him end up on the f**king islands. :laugh:

Was bad enough they got Tea Layohme to seduce him there in the third one lol.
Personally if I were Dr. Grant and I had this thing:
http://imagehost.epier.com/129077/resonating-chamber(2).jpg
I'd be sneaking around Ellie's house making raptor noises in the night, scaring the shit out of her.

But thankfully I'm not Dr. Grant.


hahaha wow.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on May 06, 2014, 09:53:01 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 06, 2014, 02:44:23 PM
Sam Neill: I had no choice about Jurassic Park IV

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501119&objectid=11250568 (http://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501119&objectid=11250568)

As much as I love the original cast, it's time to move on. Let these new actors get eaten, chased and bitter for a while.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 07, 2014, 12:10:14 AM
'The Office' Actor Andy Buckley Joins 'Jurassic World' (EXCLUSIVE)

http://variety.com/2014/film/news/the-office-actor-andy-buckley-joins-jurassic-world-exclusive-1201173484/ (http://variety.com/2014/film/news/the-office-actor-andy-buckley-joins-jurassic-world-exclusive-1201173484/)

Probably plays a CEO type role
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 07, 2014, 12:12:49 AM
Quote from: ace3g on May 07, 2014, 12:10:14 AM
'The Office' Actor Andy Buckley Joins 'Jurassic World' (EXCLUSIVE)

http://variety.com/2014/film/news/the-office-actor-andy-buckley-joins-jurassic-world-exclusive-1201173484/ (http://variety.com/2014/film/news/the-office-actor-andy-buckley-joins-jurassic-world-exclusive-1201173484/)

Probably plays a CEO type role

So that's what happened to David Wallace.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on May 07, 2014, 01:51:28 PM
Quote from: RagingDragon on May 06, 2014, 03:48:50 PM
I'd be more receptive to Hammond than Grant.

And I love Sam Neill's Dr. Grant, I really do, I just think it would be stretching it after JP3. I mean the guy doesn't want to go back near the islands. Stop having him end up on the f**king islands. :laugh:

Was bad enough they got Tea Layohme to seduce him there in the third one lol.
In my JP4 idea (which JW seems to be cribbing from REALLY REALLY HEAVILY), I wanted Grant and Malcolm to cameo at the very beginning in the form of news footage of reporters asking them if they'd be visiting the new dinosaur park - Grant would just reply "hell no", and Malcolm would do *the laugh* and just blow the reporters off and walk away.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The1PerfectOrganism on May 07, 2014, 06:04:53 PM
If this one is good, My Jurassic Collection will consist of Park and World.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 07, 2014, 11:56:30 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on May 07, 2014, 01:51:28 PM
Quote from: RagingDragon on May 06, 2014, 03:48:50 PM
I'd be more receptive to Hammond than Grant.

And I love Sam Neill's Dr. Grant, I really do, I just think it would be stretching it after JP3. I mean the guy doesn't want to go back near the islands. Stop having him end up on the f**king islands. :laugh:

Was bad enough they got Tea Layohme to seduce him there in the third one lol.
In my JP4 idea (which JW seems to be cribbing from REALLY REALLY HEAVILY), I wanted Grant and Malcolm to cameo at the very beginning in the form of news footage of reporters asking them if they'd be visiting the new dinosaur park - Grant would just reply "hell no", and Malcolm would do *the laugh* and just blow the reporters off and walk away.

I like that idea a lot. It's a perfect send off for the series regulars.

In other news, well, more like fan ideas, I really hope Hasbro makes some good old-fashioned, Kenner-style rubber dinosaurs for movie toy tie-ins. No more hardened plastic ones.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on May 08, 2014, 01:30:42 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 07, 2014, 11:56:30 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on May 07, 2014, 01:51:28 PM
Quote from: RagingDragon on May 06, 2014, 03:48:50 PM
I'd be more receptive to Hammond than Grant.

And I love Sam Neill's Dr. Grant, I really do, I just think it would be stretching it after JP3. I mean the guy doesn't want to go back near the islands. Stop having him end up on the f**king islands. :laugh:

Was bad enough they got Tea Layohme to seduce him there in the third one lol.
In my JP4 idea (which JW seems to be cribbing from REALLY REALLY HEAVILY), I wanted Grant and Malcolm to cameo at the very beginning in the form of news footage of reporters asking them if they'd be visiting the new dinosaur park - Grant would just reply "hell no", and Malcolm would do *the laugh* and just blow the reporters off and walk away.

I like that idea a lot. It's a perfect send off for the series regulars.

In other news, well, more like fan ideas, I really hope Hasbro makes some good old-fashioned, Kenner-style rubber dinosaurs for movie toy tie-ins. No more hardened plastic ones.
I don't see it happening, unfortunately. Hasbro is not Kenner. :(

All the same, I plan to buy the shit out of a ton of Jurassic World toys, I cannot f**king wait.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 08, 2014, 01:37:11 AM
Well, as long they aren't JP 3 repaints again. The JP 3D toys offered a glimmer of hope.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on May 08, 2014, 02:05:29 AM
Apparently there's a few JP3 toys that never got released and got teased as potentially being part of the JP3D line, and then didn't get released for that either - I wouldn't be surprised if they got held back and will be released for JW.

I'm 100% confident we're going to get new stuff for JW. It's a brand-new big-budget movie with a big cast and a lot of hype. If JP3 got new toys, JW definitely will.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 08, 2014, 11:03:38 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on May 08, 2014, 02:05:29 AM
Apparently there's a few JP3 toys that never got released and got teased as potentially being part of the JP3D line, and then didn't get released for that either

No kidding eh? Any sources on them?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on May 09, 2014, 03:56:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 08, 2014, 11:03:38 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on May 08, 2014, 02:05:29 AM
Apparently there's a few JP3 toys that never got released and got teased as potentially being part of the JP3D line, and then didn't get released for that either

No kidding eh? Any sources on them?
I remember seeing them talked about on the JPToys.com forums when the JP3D stuff was being released, I'll have to do some digging and see if I can find more info. People were posting prototype photos and quotes from Hasbro, if I remember right.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 12, 2014, 10:18:52 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlPoPMbiffU#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlPoPMbiffU#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 12, 2014, 07:29:08 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on May 12, 2014, 10:18:52 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlPoPMbiffU#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlPoPMbiffU#ws)

wtf lol

Infinitely scarier
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 12, 2014, 07:43:27 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on May 08, 2014, 02:05:29 AM
Apparently there's a few JP3 toys that never got released and got teased as potentially being part of the JP3D line, and then didn't get released for that either - I wouldn't be surprised if they got held back and will be released for JW.

I'm 100% confident we're going to get new stuff for JW. It's a brand-new big-budget movie with a big cast and a lot of hype. If JP3 got new toys, JW definitely will.

Hasbro being as "cheap" as it is... there's gonna be a few old molds for sure. :P

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 12, 2014, 07:47:50 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on May 12, 2014, 10:18:52 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlPoPMbiffU#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlPoPMbiffU#ws)

That actually fits pretty well.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 12, 2014, 10:21:05 PM
http://www.thewrap.com/jurassic-world-scores-incredibles-composer-michael-giacchino/ (http://www.thewrap.com/jurassic-world-scores-incredibles-composer-michael-giacchino/)

He was my top choice for this! I'm so friggin' excited right now. Loved what he did with the JP games for PS1 back in the days.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 12, 2014, 10:36:54 PM
YES!

Oh f**k yah.

I wonder if he'll sneak in some of his own themes from the Playstation days.  :laugh:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NY9sEDTFe5g#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NY9sEDTFe5g#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on May 12, 2014, 10:39:12 PM
Quote from: Xenomrph on May 07, 2014, 01:51:28 PM
In my JP4 idea (which JW seems to be cribbing from REALLY REALLY HEAVILY), I wanted Grant and Malcolm to cameo at the very beginning in the form of news footage of reporters asking them if they'd be visiting the new dinosaur park - Grant would just reply "hell no", and Malcolm would do *the laugh* and just blow the reporters off and walk away.

That would be so awesome if they did that. They touched on the news stories and scandals a bit in Lost World, but there was more to it in the books. Total denial from all parties involved, though I can't remember if it was something to do with InGen's secrecy contract thing or a decision from the characters themselves.

And laughed my ass right off at cat raptors. :laugh: :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 12, 2014, 10:50:16 PM
We called it back in August last year on the podcast.

Fantastic news!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 12, 2014, 10:55:51 PM
Get an interview with him!  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 13, 2014, 01:14:06 AM
Wahoooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!! ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on May 13, 2014, 01:29:58 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on May 12, 2014, 10:21:05 PM
http://www.thewrap.com/jurassic-world-scores-incredibles-composer-michael-giacchino/ (http://www.thewrap.com/jurassic-world-scores-incredibles-composer-michael-giacchino/)

He was my top choice for this! I'm so friggin' excited right now. Loved what he did with the JP games for PS1 back in the days.

HOLY SHIT YES
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 13, 2014, 05:30:15 AM
Given that I think Giacchino is basically Williams' heir, this is excellent news.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 13, 2014, 11:22:32 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on May 12, 2014, 10:21:05 PM
http://www.thewrap.com/jurassic-world-scores-incredibles-composer-michael-giacchino/ (http://www.thewrap.com/jurassic-world-scores-incredibles-composer-michael-giacchino/)

He was my top choice for this! I'm so friggin' excited right now. Loved what he did with the JP games for PS1 back in the days.

I have no idea who this is.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 13, 2014, 11:32:45 AM
You're kidding right Doom?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 13, 2014, 11:44:53 AM
No.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 13, 2014, 11:48:31 AM
His films include...

Cloverfield
Star Trek
Star Trek Into Darkness
John Carter
UP
The Incredibles
Lost

and games...

The Lost World: Jurassic Park (PS1 game)
Jurassic Park: Warpath (game)

He's the perfect choice hands down.

Listen here...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXTspZhM05A&list=PLD6E4985C2AA8AA00 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXTspZhM05A&list=PLD6E4985C2AA8AA00)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 13, 2014, 11:49:46 AM
I just listened to the track posted on the previous page. Yeah, I agree! He is a good choice, especially with that resume of his.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 13, 2014, 11:52:04 AM
A lot of people say he's the new Williams, considering his love of huge sweeping theme tunes. Star Trek is a prime example of this. I'm sure whatever he'll come up with will be fantastic.

It's also been said that he'll be doing something new, much like what TLW soundtrack was to JP.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 13, 2014, 12:07:19 PM
Speaking of TLW,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n29psZZS2SA#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n29psZZS2SA#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 13, 2014, 12:33:02 PM
Great review, I still own and play the game from time to time. It is frustrating but still fun to play. I own the soundtrack separately which you can pick up every cheap on Amazon. It's a fantastic score.

Oh and for those who haven't seen it the amazing Ian Malcolm cut scene from the game...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4_jMfBq3dc (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4_jMfBq3dc)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 13, 2014, 01:38:00 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 13, 2014, 12:33:02 PM
Great review, I still own and play the game from time to time. It is frustrating but still fun to play. I own the soundtrack separately which you can pick up every cheap on Amazon. It's a fantastic score.

Oh and for those who haven't seen it the amazing Ian Malcolm cut scene from the game...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4_jMfBq3dc (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4_jMfBq3dc)

Yep!  :D

Btw, about Giacchino, you and BamSam should REALLY hook him in for your next podcast.  I believe it'd be an interesting segment to delve into the music of the franchise (seeing as you guys use a riffed version in your intro).  Also, I think I requested you mates to possibly express thoughts on the different scores provided throughout the films on Facebook or something.

Anyway, I know the man's on twitter and he seems to be a real nice guy, and probably not too busy for a 20 min. chat ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 13, 2014, 02:24:10 PM
We haven't approached him yet and we're going to.

I think we'll get him post JW, by then he'll have more to say.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 13, 2014, 02:27:42 PM
Nah.. get him now and get him to talk about his videogame soundtracks...

THEN the next interview will be about jurassic world. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 13, 2014, 02:39:16 PM
That's the plan ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 13, 2014, 10:00:05 PM
POSSIBLE SPOILER

Spoiler
Take this rumor with a grain of salt: http://www.showbizspy.com/article/274072/bryce-dallas-howard-caught-in-dinosaur-mouth.html (http://www.showbizspy.com/article/274072/bryce-dallas-howard-caught-in-dinosaur-mouth.html)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 13, 2014, 10:04:22 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on May 13, 2014, 10:00:05 PM
POSSIBLE SPOILER

Spoiler
Take this rumor with a grain of salt: http://www.showbizspy.com/article/274072/bryce-dallas-howard-caught-in-dinosaur-mouth.html (http://www.showbizspy.com/article/274072/bryce-dallas-howard-caught-in-dinosaur-mouth.html)
[close]

TIME.
TO ABANDON.
THREAD.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 13, 2014, 10:44:17 PM
Will not click. Forget you scarhunter92!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 13, 2014, 11:32:29 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on May 13, 2014, 10:00:05 PM
POSSIBLE SPOILER

Spoiler
Take this rumor with a grain of salt: http://www.showbizspy.com/article/274072/bryce-dallas-howard-caught-in-dinosaur-mouth.html (http://www.showbizspy.com/article/274072/bryce-dallas-howard-caught-in-dinosaur-mouth.html)
[close]
Finally!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 14, 2014, 10:38:26 AM
It's fake.

Confirmed on twitter by Frank Marshall.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on May 14, 2014, 03:15:35 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on May 13, 2014, 10:00:05 PM
POSSIBLE SPOILER

Spoiler
Take this rumor with a grain of salt: http://www.showbizspy.com/article/274072/bryce-dallas-howard-caught-in-dinosaur-mouth.html (http://www.showbizspy.com/article/274072/bryce-dallas-howard-caught-in-dinosaur-mouth.html)
[close]

Spoiler
Mechanical? Dafuq did I just read?
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 14, 2014, 03:22:27 PM
...it's an animatronic... :P
Quote from: Alien³ on May 14, 2014, 10:38:26 AM
It's fake.

Confirmed on twitter by Frank Marshall.


Producers and filmmakers lie about their films all the time... ex: Michael Bay saying that Soundwave wasnt the mercedes in Dark of the Moon "because mercedes would never let one of their cars be used by a villain". Actually, they did. :P If this is a spoiler for the film that got out, it makes sense that they would lie. So.. "maybe it's fake". :P We'll see.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 14, 2014, 03:24:26 PM
Real or Fake either way it's something that we should bury.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 14, 2014, 05:50:12 PM
I'm sure the animatronic shots are all going to be done in the New Orleans studios.

I wonder if they built a huge interior jungle like they did for JPIII.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on May 14, 2014, 09:45:56 PM
Quote from: BANE on May 13, 2014, 11:32:29 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on May 13, 2014, 10:00:05 PM
POSSIBLE SPOILER

Spoiler
Take this rumor with a grain of salt: http://www.showbizspy.com/article/274072/bryce-dallas-howard-caught-in-dinosaur-mouth.html (http://www.showbizspy.com/article/274072/bryce-dallas-howard-caught-in-dinosaur-mouth.html)
[close]
Finally!
It's coming true!

Quote from: Alien³ on May 14, 2014, 03:24:26 PM
Real or Fake either way it's something that we should bury.
Why?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 14, 2014, 11:01:02 PM
Oh hi everyone. I have more toys to share! They just arrived today :)

http://instagram.com/p/n_nrFJlEmD/ (http://instagram.com/p/n_nrFJlEmD/)
http://instagram.com/p/n_oEzJFEml/ (http://instagram.com/p/n_oEzJFEml/)
http://instagram.com/p/n_ocLpFEnH/ (http://instagram.com/p/n_ocLpFEnH/)
http://instagram.com/p/n_oshElEnW/ (http://instagram.com/p/n_oshElEnW/)
http://instagram.com/p/n_plZ-FEog/ (http://instagram.com/p/n_plZ-FEog/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 14, 2014, 11:10:14 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NktN3fpC7sk#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NktN3fpC7sk#ws)

Guys.. GUYS!

Michael Giacchino is gonna do some cool stuff with the Jurassic World score.  ;D :D YEAHHHH...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 15, 2014, 05:57:29 AM
Already know!  It's awesome!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 15, 2014, 05:59:20 AM
I never knew he did video game scores. He's come a long way since then.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on May 15, 2014, 06:01:02 AM
I remember the game.  Being rex and throwing dudes over your shoulder, good times.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Keg on May 15, 2014, 12:02:22 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on May 15, 2014, 05:59:20 AM
I never knew he did video game scores. He's come a long way since then.

Yup. Done alot of the earlier Medal Of Honor soundtracks and a did a superb score for Black on the PS2 and Xbox.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dq36pE-xcug#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dq36pE-xcug#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on May 15, 2014, 01:27:31 PM
Quote from: ace3g on May 02, 2014, 01:04:33 AM
Spoiler

(https://scontent-a-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/t1.0-9/q71/s720x720/10322770_10152399028893812_4635198066632459045_n.jpg)
[close]


Spoiler
I'll put money on him becoming that mouse
[close]

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 15, 2014, 06:58:59 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on May 15, 2014, 05:59:20 AM
I never knew he did video game scores. He's come a long way since then.

Yeah, that was one of his first gigs, doing The Lost World game score. It's a nice coming full circle for him.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 15, 2014, 09:22:04 PM
http://www.cracked.com/video_18891_5-jurassic-park-plot-holes-with-horrifying-implications.html (http://www.cracked.com/video_18891_5-jurassic-park-plot-holes-with-horrifying-implications.html)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 15, 2014, 11:19:05 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 15, 2014, 09:22:04 PM
http://www.cracked.com/video_18891_5-jurassic-park-plot-holes-with-horrifying-implications.html (http://www.cracked.com/video_18891_5-jurassic-park-plot-holes-with-horrifying-implications.html)

I love these After Hours videos but I'd find the JP one funnier if they got their facts right. ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 15, 2014, 11:40:14 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 15, 2014, 11:19:05 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 15, 2014, 09:22:04 PM
http://www.cracked.com/video_18891_5-jurassic-park-plot-holes-with-horrifying-implications.html (http://www.cracked.com/video_18891_5-jurassic-park-plot-holes-with-horrifying-implications.html)

I love these After Hours videos but I'd find the JP one funnier if they got their facts right. ::)

I thought the time travel bit at the end was a bit silly. And I only just noticed the Burger King advertising in TLW. The logo next to the Rex before it chomps on the traffic light is supremely obnoxious.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 15, 2014, 11:55:45 PM
They never make me want what the logos are "selling" in product placement in films. I just take it as Burger Kings exist in real life. If a T-Rex did rampage through San Diego there'd probably be a Burger King around.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 16, 2014, 02:29:21 AM
Dude, it was fairly obvious. You don't just include a gigantic BK sign that takes up nearly 30% of the screen just because "it happened to be there". Not to mention, there's a banner for a Whopper Value Menu on the side of the bus that is seen as soon as people fall out of the bus windows after Rexy smacks it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 16, 2014, 03:42:31 AM
Eh, I see that sort of stuff all the time in real life, so it doesn't bother me in movies.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 16, 2014, 09:13:50 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on May 16, 2014, 03:42:31 AM
Eh, I see that sort of stuff all the time in real life, so it doesn't bother me in movies.

Yeah. If you're that upset by adverts in movies a walk down a busy high street must be hellish.

I just ignore them and enjoy the T-Rex rampaging in the city. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 16, 2014, 11:23:35 AM
I'm not saying it's a bad thing. It's just irritating when it's that obvious.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 16, 2014, 12:05:19 PM
I just generally don't notice product placement in films -- and this is no exception.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 16, 2014, 12:49:31 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 16, 2014, 11:23:35 AM
I'm not saying it's a bad thing. It's just irritating when it's that obvious.

Just look around the room you're in now and list the product names you see.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 16, 2014, 01:40:17 PM
This is real life. In a movie, a decision can be made to not show certain things so this is rather a silly point to make.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 16, 2014, 01:50:00 PM
Movies are all about making money. If they advertise they're going to get money.

It's better as a viewer to just chalk it down to those companies exist in our reality and the fictional one. Then forget about it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on May 16, 2014, 02:24:43 PM
The only product placement that's ever pissed me off is the Nountain dew in Erik Lehnsherr's sig.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 16, 2014, 02:31:33 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 16, 2014, 01:50:00 PM
Movies are all about making money. If they advertise they're going to get money.

It's better as a viewer to just chalk it down to those companies exist in our reality and the fictional one. Then forget about it.

Yes, I know they're about making money, hence why the company names and logos are pronounced when we see them. My point is not that they do or don't exist, in this universe, or the fictitious one. My point is that it's irritating all the same, and probably isn't as necessary as you think. Have you ever seen Sons of Anarchy? No word of a lie, the show goes out of its way to deliberately replace company labels and such with fake ones.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on May 17, 2014, 11:45:26 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4wh_mc8hRE# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4wh_mc8hRE#)

As much as I enjoyed Man of Steel (certainly more than I thought I would) the action sequences involving IHOP and Sears were f**king atrocious.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 18, 2014, 01:21:32 AM
Anyone think will get something for SDCC14?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The1PerfectOrganism on May 18, 2014, 01:23:42 AM
Quote from: bloodinthemud on May 16, 2014, 02:24:43 PM
The only product placement that's ever pissed me off is the Nountain dew in Erik Lehnsherr's sig.

Hahahaha.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 18, 2014, 01:24:37 AM
Lol, yea.  I thought that was a photoshop spoof.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The1PerfectOrganism on May 18, 2014, 01:29:40 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 18, 2014, 01:24:37 AM
Lol, yea.  I thought that was a photoshop spoof.

I've seen versions without, but it's funnier with.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on May 18, 2014, 01:38:41 AM
lol  :D if that shot is in the final film it's all I'm gonna be able to see and I will sit silently seething with rage.


something like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRQqaVUkVpE (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRQqaVUkVpE)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 18, 2014, 01:41:27 AM
Quote from: bloodinthemud on May 16, 2014, 02:24:43 PM
The only product placement that's ever pissed me off is the Nountain dew in Erik Lehnsherr's sig.

Man of Steel's product placement did get to me. Ridiculous.

They fought in a freaking Denny's! And so many others.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The1PerfectOrganism on May 18, 2014, 01:44:57 AM
Quote from: bloodinthemud on May 18, 2014, 01:38:41 AM
lol  :D if that shot is in the final film it's all I'm gonna be able to see and I will sit silently seething with rage.


something like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRQqaVUkVpE (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRQqaVUkVpE)

Because advertisements (that also get quickly torn off) in a football stadium is unrealistic lol.

If it was a van in a street or a building it would be complaint-worthy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on May 18, 2014, 04:43:56 AM
Quote from: Erik Lehnsherr on May 18, 2014, 01:44:57 AM
Quote from: bloodinthemud on May 18, 2014, 01:38:41 AM
lol  :D if that shot is in the final film it's all I'm gonna be able to see and I will sit silently seething with rage.


something like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRQqaVUkVpE (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRQqaVUkVpE)

Because advertisements (that also get quickly torn off) in a football stadium is unrealistic lol.

If it was a van in a street or a building it would be complaint-worthy.

No, only because I've seen it in your sig for too long and I will only be reminded of that. Any other time I don't notice at all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on May 19, 2014, 02:10:16 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 18, 2014, 01:21:32 AM
Anyone think will get something for SDCC14?

I f**king goddamn hope so.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on May 19, 2014, 02:14:51 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 18, 2014, 01:21:32 AM
Anyone think will get something for SDCC14?

Most likely a proof of concept teaser like with Godzilla.

Let's just hope, unlike Godzilla, we don't have it hidden from us for a year and a half.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 19, 2014, 02:59:21 AM
Yes, and let's hope nobody whines about the film once they see it; as many are doing so now for Godzilla and previous anticipated releases.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on May 19, 2014, 03:00:05 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 19, 2014, 02:59:21 AM
Yes, and let's hope nobody whines about the film once they see it; as many are doing so now for Godzilla and previous anticipated releases.
:laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on May 19, 2014, 03:00:55 AM
People aren't allowed to dislike the film when it comes out? :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on May 19, 2014, 03:01:17 AM
MINDLESSLY CONSUME ENTERTAINMENT NOM NOM NOM
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 19, 2014, 03:03:05 AM
lolz.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 19, 2014, 03:20:17 AM
They can dislike.  But as I said in the Godzilla thread, people shouldn't allow simple flaws to ruin the film's overall effort of entertainment.    Give me one valid reason why we obnoxious critics deserve a flawless movie?  I've learned to leave my cricism at the door, cause I ain't getting paid for it- and frankly, no one gives a shit for it. 

But go ahead, no reason to not have minor gripes  ;)

And I'm not targeting this site specifically; it's many of the folk out there....
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on May 19, 2014, 03:24:45 AM
Okay, next time I'll remember to not question anything in a film featuring our lord and savior Godzilla-chan.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on May 19, 2014, 03:25:33 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 19, 2014, 03:20:17 AM
Give me one valid reason why we obnoxious critics deserve a flawless movie?
Not necessarily flawless, but certainly we deserve something worth the money we paid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 19, 2014, 03:49:14 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on May 19, 2014, 03:25:33 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 19, 2014, 03:20:17 AM
Give me one valid reason why we obnoxious critics deserve a flawless movie?
Not necessarily flawless, but certainly we deserve something worth the money we paid.

What?  A true fan's shot at making the second big budget Godzilla movie in 15 years isn't worth 10-ish dollars?

Quote from: Cal427eb on May 19, 2014, 03:24:45 AM
Okay, next time I'll remember to not question anything in a film featuring our lord and savior Godzilla-chan.

Gooooooood

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 19, 2014, 07:47:11 AM
Speaking of Godzilla, did anyone else besides me have a Jurassic Park flashback in the opening scene with the helicopter flying over the forest canopy in the Philippines? It was practically the exact same scenery and definitely the same model chopper.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 19, 2014, 11:57:39 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 19, 2014, 03:20:17 AM
They can dislike.  But as I said in the Godzilla thread, people shouldn't allow simple flaws to ruin the film's overall effort of entertainment.    Give me one valid reason why we obnoxious critics deserve a flawless movie?  I've learned to leave my cricism at the door, cause I ain't getting paid for it- and frankly, no one gives a shit for it. 

But go ahead, no reason to not have minor gripes  ;)

And I'm not targeting this site specifically; it's many of the folk out there....

Simple flaws are usually the biggest! Godzila has some serious flaws and just because you like the movie unconditionally doesn't mean it's perfect. I love JP3 despite it having some serious flaws lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 19, 2014, 12:21:38 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 19, 2014, 07:47:11 AM
Speaking of Godzilla, did anyone else besides me have a Jurassic Park flashback in the opening scene with the helicopter flying over the forest canopy in the Philippines? It was practically the exact same scenery and definitely the same model chopper.
And when the bus driver cleans the glass...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 19, 2014, 12:23:01 PM
And when the kid points out the creature to his mom (Olsen) and we get the expected "Holy shit this kid's right there's a motherf**king monster right there!" reaction.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 19, 2014, 12:34:15 PM
And when
Spoiler
Godzilla/t-rex saves Ford's ass at the end after walking up to the female MUTO/raptors like a ninja.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 19, 2014, 01:06:18 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 19, 2014, 07:47:11 AM
Speaking of Godzilla, did anyone else besides me have a Jurassic Park flashback in the opening scene with the helicopter flying over the forest canopy in the Philippines? It was practically the exact same scenery and definitely the same model chopper.

Yep major JP vibes. Many early reviews had said it took cues from Jurassic Park but I wasn't expecting it to be that much. Specially the beginning with the chopper and excavation site. No complaints here though haha.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 19, 2014, 02:57:01 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on May 19, 2014, 12:21:38 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 19, 2014, 07:47:11 AM
Speaking of Godzilla, did anyone else besides me have a Jurassic Park flashback in the opening scene with the helicopter flying over the forest canopy in the Philippines? It was practically the exact same scenery and definitely the same model chopper.
And when the bus driver cleans the glass...

That too!  Good call xeno-kaname, I was wondering about it all. The funny thing is, this is exactly what people ripped the 1998 Godzilla for but I guess the cues here made more sense.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 19, 2014, 03:04:05 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 19, 2014, 02:57:01 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on May 19, 2014, 12:21:38 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 19, 2014, 07:47:11 AM
Speaking of Godzilla, did anyone else besides me have a Jurassic Park flashback in the opening scene with the helicopter flying over the forest canopy in the Philippines? It was practically the exact same scenery and definitely the same model chopper.
And when the bus driver cleans the glass...

That too!  Good call xeno-kaname, I was wondering about it all. The funny thing is, this is exactly what people ripped the 1998 Godzilla for but I guess the cues here made more sense.

Don't you mean Omegazilla?  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 19, 2014, 03:06:00 PM
I hate naming names.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 19, 2014, 04:25:41 PM
Call me Snake.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 19, 2014, 04:26:25 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on May 19, 2014, 04:25:41 PM
Call me Snake.

Snaaaaaaaaaaaake!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on May 19, 2014, 04:26:50 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on May 19, 2014, 04:25:41 PM
Call me Snake.

I thought you were dead.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 19, 2014, 08:34:33 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on May 19, 2014, 12:21:38 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 19, 2014, 07:47:11 AM
Speaking of Godzilla, did anyone else besides me have a Jurassic Park flashback in the opening scene with the helicopter flying over the forest canopy in the Philippines? It was practically the exact same scenery and definitely the same model chopper.
And when the bus driver cleans the glass...

Yesssss.  And Mark Degler from JP3 fulfilled his military official role in the movie too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 19, 2014, 10:34:24 PM
Our boy Taylor!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 20, 2014, 01:00:08 AM
So the plot of the new film is rumoured to be about.......

http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/exclusive-spoilery-details-on-jurassic-world-the-park-the-dinos-more (http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/exclusive-spoilery-details-on-jurassic-world-the-park-the-dinos-more)
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/67380 (http://www.aintitcool.com/node/67380)

Spoiler
JURASSIC WORLD to feature a T-Rex/raptor/snake/cuttlefish hybrid dinosaur!?!
[close]

AND as far as i'm concerned it SOUNDS CRAZIER THAN THE DEINONYCHUS being trained as military attack dogs script by JOHN SAYLES!  :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

Good lord, if this is true... bring me this film NOW!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on May 20, 2014, 01:04:27 AM
 :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 20, 2014, 01:05:36 AM
All this film needs now is the crazy new dinosaur eating colombian drug lords. Why? Why not?

INSTANT CLASSIC. GIVE THIS FILM ALL THE OSCARS.

guys.. guys! dis gonna be fun.  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on May 20, 2014, 01:08:27 AM
So what this new park is mixing the DNA of other dinosaurs and animals together? Sounds like the plot to Wes Craven's Swamp Thing. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 20, 2014, 01:09:59 AM
The first film's dinosaurs had frog dna. That little idea was there since the beginning.. this film is apparently taking that and running the marathon with it. ;D

This is basically the Jurassic Park Chaos Effect toyline.. brought to the screen.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 20, 2014, 01:10:55 AM
Quote from: First Blood on May 20, 2014, 01:08:27 AM
So what this new park is mixing the DNA of other dinosaurs and animals together? Sounds like the plot to Wes Craven's Swamp Thing. :laugh:

If this movie has wolf man Jourdan, then I'm sold.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 20, 2014, 01:13:30 AM
I mean...it sounds crazy, but stupid crazy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on May 20, 2014, 01:14:31 AM
I read that in Muldoon's voice.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 20, 2014, 01:24:04 AM
Interesting.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 20, 2014, 01:27:38 AM
Quote from: First Blood on May 20, 2014, 01:14:31 AM
I read that in Muldoon's voice.
Speaking of gameskeepers, I want the security head on Jurassic World to be a gruff redhead Scottish bloke with a thick Glaswegian accent whose first words are "I don't know what the f**k a redhead's doing on a tropical island off the coast of Florida. If the dinosaurs don't kill me the f**king skin cancer will."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 20, 2014, 01:38:34 AM
Not reading it, rumour or otherwise. Hell, I'm probably going to avoid the trailers for this film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 20, 2014, 01:42:15 AM
A talking dino dream wouldn't be out of place in this. Chris Pratt has experience with talking animals. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 20, 2014, 01:44:24 AM
lolz. nope.

no ALAN!

ALAN!

scenes anymore, plz.

and please let's make the jokes actually funny in this. JP3 was a huge cringe fest.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: coolbreeze on May 20, 2014, 01:45:29 AM
Quote from: BANE on May 20, 2014, 01:27:38 AM
Quote from: First Blood on May 20, 2014, 01:14:31 AM
I read that in Muldoon's voice.
Speaking of gameskeepers, I want the security head on Jurassic World to be a gruff redhead Scottish bloke with a thick Glaswegian accent whose first words are "I don't know what the f**k a redhead's doing on a tropical island off the coast of Florida. If the dinosaurs don't kill me the f**king skin cancer will."

Tony Curran?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2Fthumb%2F9%2F99%2FTony_Curran_-_Defiance_Panel_%2528cropped%2529.jpg%2F220px-Tony_Curran_-_Defiance_Panel_%2528cropped%2529.jpg&hash=eb9c9f098b7048248954d86fba252014a1c6f9ba)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 20, 2014, 01:46:08 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on May 20, 2014, 01:44:24 AM
lolz. nope.

no ALAN!

ALAN!

scenes anymore, plz.

and please let's make the jokes actually funny in this. JP3 was a huge cringe fest.

He'll be dreaming of Rocket Raccoon instead.

PETER!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on May 20, 2014, 04:19:04 AM
If that's really the truth about Jurassic World, please no.  f**king stupid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 20, 2014, 04:30:53 AM
If nerds had internet around the time Aliens was being made.. and if they got wind that Ripley, the survivor of the first film was gonna go full on "action hero" mode on the sequel and jump inside a powerloader to fight the "Alien Queen", a bigger badder xeno than the one from the first film (what a "fanboy idea".. hollywood is retarded and unimaginative!").... and even get to say a one liner... in a film with a slightly different tone from the first while still repeating a LOT of the same story beats... holy shiiieet. NERD RAGE and instant condemnation before seeing a single frame.

"omg fuking stupid!" "Hollywood is ruining our favourite fairly realistic horror films with action moopies shite!"

Wah Wah Wah.  :laugh:

It all comes down to the execution.. let's wait and see. People can still do that, right?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on May 20, 2014, 05:24:55 AM
No it IS f**king stupid.  If you have to add traits to your big bad to make them more big bad then that's one of the most obvious ways that your franchise has run out of ideas.  And yes it ALSO happened to the Alien series.  Lets keep adding stuff to make the Alien more deadly except have everybody survive the more deadly alien and stop them in space again.  The Aliens involved into such a nonthreat throughout the course of the movies that humanity survived to infestations on earth. 

I bet this proposed superbad dino badass in JP world won't kill anymore people than the rex or raptors in the previous films and gets stopped before it does anything of note besides eating people.

Its one of the oldest and most useless tropes in all of story making.  Lets add something to an already dangerous villain/monster to make them MORE DANGEROUS........except nothing ever really comes from it.


SPOILER RANT

I don't need to wait and see to know that a cuttlefish dinosaur is a f**kING STUPID idea.  Dino Crisis was an excellent video game franchise........until it involved spliced DNA dinosaurs. 

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 20, 2014, 05:34:56 AM
and the first, second and third films had frog-dinosaurs. splicing up genes from different species onto dino DNA has always been a part of the franchise. Having some dinosaurs be bigger than their real life counterparts is also another part.  The franchise has always been slightly "stupid" with dodgy science and a few leaps in logic to serve plot and to be "kewl!". It's okay. It's just meant to be entertainment for the "whole family".

Given the director's comments... from the looks of it, it seems they are using that "hybrid" notion to sort of criticize the need of corporations to always have "bigger, better" attractions... but let's wait and find out.

(I cant wait till this rumour ends up being proven true and the fanboy tears start rolling.  ;D )
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naissus on May 20, 2014, 11:23:09 AM
So is Jurassic World going to be aired on Sci Fi along with sharknado and sharktapus?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 20, 2014, 12:54:22 PM
I just want people to be lost in the jungle, being chased by dinosaurs. Is that too much to ask for?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 20, 2014, 12:58:50 PM
...there's already been 3 films of that.

And the new film will STILL have that going by all the set reports. :P

Is nostalgia for the first film so strong that any idea that tries to be different gets automatically shunned by fans?
Because the tons of shit jurassic park 4 fan scripts do point at that notion.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 20, 2014, 01:01:17 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on May 20, 2014, 05:34:56 AM
and the first, second and third films had frog-dinosaurs. splicing up genes from different species onto dino DNA has always been a part of the franchise. Having some dinosaurs be bigger than their real life counterparts is also another part.  The franchise has always been slightly "stupid" with dodgy science and a few leaps in logic to serve plot and to be "kewl!". It's okay. It's just meant to be entertainment for the "whole family".

Given the director's comments... from the looks of it, it seems they are using that "hybrid" notion to sort of criticize the need of corporations to always have "bigger, better" attractions... but let's wait and find out.

(I cant wait till this rumour ends up being proven true and the fanboy tears start rolling.  ;D )
There was a need for the frog DNA though. And it ended up being vital to the plot.

I don't really know how they're going to do this. I don't want something like the white alien from Alien Resurrection (i.e to go too far). If they're just using snake or fish DNA to fill in genome gaps then cool. But if they're creating a half raptor half parakeet then no thanks.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 20, 2014, 01:03:28 PM
Trevorrow and crew are not stupid. Trust me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on May 20, 2014, 01:04:46 PM
I'd be happiest if it was just a 2-hour faux-documentary of keepers talking about how mucking out the Triceratops pen is a tough job, but scrubbing the dinosaurs clean while they honk appreciatively makes it all worth while. Maybe show the Tyrannosaurus offering its foot up to have its claws filed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 20, 2014, 01:32:13 PM
Quote from: BANE on May 20, 2014, 01:01:17 PM
There was a need for the frog DNA though. And it ended up being vital to the plot.

Vital to the "theme" of "life finds a way"... but not really vital to the plot, because you could have probably 98% of the same film without the FROG DNA shenanigans (why not bird dna? Given that birds are descendants of dinos? Frog DNA is just there for the sex change stuff.). The plot element that when removed would make the castle of cards fall down is the BioSyn sabotage.

Oh and Trevorrow said "no feathers!" early on... so no raptor-parakeet hybrid. ;D I'm sure the new dino will look badass and cool. It's probably based off of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raptorex (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raptorex) an actual find.

Quote from: Alien³ on May 20, 2014, 01:03:28 PM
Trevorrow and crew are not stupid. Trust me.

This. Joe Johnston did JP3 just to get another paycheck. Spielberg himself didnt seem to have much passion to do the Lost World sequel given some of his comments. Trevorrow seems to actually want to prove himself as a director given that this is just his 2nd film.

Let's relax a bit and see what we get.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 20, 2014, 01:50:41 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on May 20, 2014, 05:34:56 AM
and the first, second and third films had frog-dinosaurs. splicing up genes from different species onto dino DNA has always been a part of the franchise. Having some dinosaurs be bigger than their real life counterparts is also another part.  The franchise has always been slightly "stupid" with dodgy science and a few leaps in logic to serve plot and to be "kewl!". It's okay. It's just meant to be entertainment for the "whole family".

Given the director's comments... from the looks of it, it seems they are using that "hybrid" notion to sort of criticize the need of corporations to always have "bigger, better" attractions... but let's wait and find out.

(I cant wait till this rumour ends up being proven true and the fanboy tears start rolling.  ;D )

Dinosaurs were real creatures and not the figment of someone's imagination. Not accurately representing them, I feel, is dishonest and quite frankly, insulting. Why is it so hard to show them as they really looked?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on May 20, 2014, 01:53:33 PM
Insulting?  :laugh: To who?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 20, 2014, 01:54:56 PM
To anyone who knows anything about dinosaurs. You'd be hard-pressed to find any dinosaur enthusiast that isn't aggravated by Jurassic Park's representation of them on some level.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on May 20, 2014, 01:55:51 PM
So? It's a f**king movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 20, 2014, 01:57:27 PM
....So, Doomrulz you werent "insulted" by the first film because you didnt knew better at the time? Why are you even a fan of the franchise? :P

As soon as the director of this film announced that "there wont be any feathers!" you should have looked for accuracy elsewhere.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 20, 2014, 01:59:12 PM
I was six years old when the film was first released. I accept that liberties are taken, but given my knowledge of dinosaurs right now, it's hard for me to not watch the film and pick out what's wrong with the animals.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on May 20, 2014, 02:27:19 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on May 20, 2014, 01:00:08 AM
So the plot of the new film is rumoured to be about.......

http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/exclusive-spoilery-details-on-jurassic-world-the-park-the-dinos-more (http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/exclusive-spoilery-details-on-jurassic-world-the-park-the-dinos-more)
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/67380 (http://www.aintitcool.com/node/67380)

Spoiler
JURASSIC WORLD to feature a T-Rex/raptor/snake/cuttlefish hybrid dinosaur!?!
[close]

AND as far as i'm concerned it SOUNDS CRAZIER THAN THE DEINONYCHUS being trained as military attack dogs script by JOHN SAYLES!  :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

Good lord, if this is true... bring me this film NOW!

Spoiler
QuoteAccording to our source, there will be lots of Dino on Dino fighting, as some of the Dinos are "good guys" that are trained by Chris Pratt's character. The raptors and T-Rex are among the "trained" good dinosaurs. The big bad dinosaur has instant camouflage abilities, like the cuttlefish, so he blends into the background, is smart like the velociraptor, uses his jaw like a snake, and can terrorize like the T-Rex.

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

Gonna be a piece of shit.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 20, 2014, 02:30:01 PM
It's gonna get 73% Fresh Tomato Score, will probably be better than the 2nd and 3rd films and you'll hate it.

It'll also get tons of $$$.

FANBOYS WILL WEEP.


i'll be happy.  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on May 20, 2014, 02:31:19 PM
Nah, they'll love it like they love their other 70-something percent RT scored manchild mediocrities ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 20, 2014, 02:32:27 PM
If only this was directed by Brian De Palma and received a 20% Rotten score... you'd sure love it!  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on May 20, 2014, 02:36:03 PM
There'd be treacherous lesbian velociraptors and Pino Donaggio would throw John Williams out the window.


I'd watch that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 20, 2014, 02:39:06 PM
It would all be a dream of the main velociraptor femme fatale.  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The1PerfectOrganism on May 20, 2014, 02:39:43 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on May 20, 2014, 02:31:19 PM
Nah, they'll love it like they love their other 70-something percent RT scored manchild mediocrities ;D

Eh-

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/nymphomaniac_volume_i/ (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/nymphomaniac_volume_i/)

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/nymphomaniac_volume_ii/ (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/nymphomaniac_volume_ii/)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 20, 2014, 02:40:48 PM
And then all the dinosaurs would stand around embracing each other as another meteor hurtles inevitably towards earth.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 20, 2014, 02:41:09 PM
Quote from: Erik Lehnsherr on May 20, 2014, 02:39:43 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on May 20, 2014, 02:31:19 PM
Nah, they'll love it like they love their other 70-something percent RT scored manchild mediocrities ;D

Eh-

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/nymphomaniac_volume_i/ (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/nymphomaniac_volume_i/)

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/nymphomaniac_volume_ii/ (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/nymphomaniac_volume_ii/)



OH SCHNAPPS!

Shots fired!  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on May 20, 2014, 02:41:34 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on May 20, 2014, 02:39:06 PM
It would all be a dream of the main velociraptor femme fatale.  ;D
And it would still be more plausible than these new plot spoilers :laugh:

Quote from: Erik Lehnsherr on May 20, 2014, 02:39:43 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on May 20, 2014, 02:31:19 PM
Nah, they'll love it like they love their other 70-something percent RT scored manchild mediocrities ;D

Eh-

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/nymphomaniac_volume_i/ (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/nymphomaniac_volume_i/)

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/nymphomaniac_volume_ii/ (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/nymphomaniac_volume_ii/)


Those aren't manchild movies :-* We mean 73%/72% stuff like this:
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/prometheus_2012/ (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/prometheus_2012/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 20, 2014, 02:43:14 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on May 20, 2014, 02:41:34 PM
Those aren't manchild movies :-*
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/prometheus_2012/ (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/prometheus_2012/)

Sure...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs3.amazonaws.com%2Fcriterion-production%2Fimages%2F175-0ff6c6c4f88d450ea0f5c7314c3ae672%2Fvon-trier_2_1421_134_large.jpg&hash=ced5acfca0a385b3aca0cc4675159037b8cbdaaf)

;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 20, 2014, 02:43:36 PM
Those rumors... :-X
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The1PerfectOrganism on May 20, 2014, 02:44:49 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on May 20, 2014, 02:41:34 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on May 20, 2014, 02:39:06 PM
It would all be a dream of the main velociraptor femme fatale.  ;D
And it would still be more plausible than these new plot spoilers :laugh:

Quote from: Erik Lehnsherr on May 20, 2014, 02:39:43 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on May 20, 2014, 02:31:19 PM
Nah, they'll love it like they love their other 70-something percent RT scored manchild mediocrities ;D

Eh-

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/nymphomaniac_volume_i/ (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/nymphomaniac_volume_i/)

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/nymphomaniac_volume_ii/ (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/nymphomaniac_volume_ii/)


Those aren't manchild movies :-* We mean 73%/72% stuff like this:
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/prometheus_2012/ (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/prometheus_2012/)

Sure, Cvalda 'cause you don't watch anything like that. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 20, 2014, 02:45:29 PM
Gamera vs Viras. cough cough.

Her guilty pleasures are better than ours! NYUK NYUK.  ;D

(Gamera had a small cameo in the John Sayles script for Jurassic Park 4.. (on a tv screen.) so i guess he's aware of the 90's trilogy?)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 20, 2014, 02:46:01 PM
The chameleon dinosaur is actually not a terrible idea. It was in The Lost World novel if I remember right, and was done quite well.

The other ideas...

Good lord above.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on May 20, 2014, 02:47:08 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on May 20, 2014, 02:43:14 PM
http://s3.amazonaws.com/criterion-production/images/175-0ff6c6c4f88d450ea0f5c7314c3ae672/von-trier_2_1421_134_large.jpg

;D
You wish you had dat swag ;D

Quote from: Blacklabel on May 20, 2014, 02:45:29 PM
Gamera vs Viras. cough cough.

Her guilty pleasures are better than ours! NYUK NYUK.  ;D
Except that I will admit something like Gamera vs Viras is a shitty guilty pleasure ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 20, 2014, 02:48:40 PM
De Palma's PASSION IS A MASTERPIECE!

:laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on May 20, 2014, 02:49:24 PM
◦°˚\(*❛‿❛)/˚°◦ Trashterpiece.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on May 20, 2014, 02:54:08 PM
Spoiler
QuoteJURASSIC WORLD to feature a T-Rex/raptor/snake/cuttlefish hybrid dinosaur!?!
[close]

I didn't know this was a Deep Rising prequel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on May 20, 2014, 02:57:22 PM
Mother of god.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The1PerfectOrganism on May 20, 2014, 02:58:32 PM
Cvalda, I know Prometheus is average to you but that ain't gonna stop me liking it.
Even though I know it has more problems than I'd have previously liked to admit. I still like quite a few things about it but I wouldn't call it a guilty pleasure.

X-Men Origins: Wolverine however now that's a guilty pleasure.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on May 20, 2014, 03:07:20 PM
STOP DERAILING THE THREAD ERIK GOD
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The1PerfectOrganism on May 20, 2014, 03:08:46 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on May 20, 2014, 03:07:20 PM
STOP DERAILING THE THREAD ERIK GOD

Why?

Jurassic Park is so boooring.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 20, 2014, 03:31:12 PM
This thread just took a really weird turn, sooooo...here's this little tidbit:

http://www.theverge.com/2014/5/6/5687460/mondo-will-re-release-jurassic-park-soundtrack-on-vinyl-next-month (http://www.theverge.com/2014/5/6/5687460/mondo-will-re-release-jurassic-park-soundtrack-on-vinyl-next-month)

Don't have a vinyl player myself but it'll make for a nice addition to my JP collection.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 20, 2014, 03:50:24 PM
Quote from: Erik Lehnsherr on May 20, 2014, 03:08:46 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on May 20, 2014, 03:07:20 PM
STOP DERAILING THE THREAD ERIK GOD

Why?

Jurassic Park is so boooring.
Shut your god damned mouth.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 20, 2014, 04:05:36 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 20, 2014, 03:31:12 PM
This thread just took a really weird turn, sooooo...here's this little tidbit:

http://www.theverge.com/2014/5/6/5687460/mondo-will-re-release-jurassic-park-soundtrack-on-vinyl-next-month (http://www.theverge.com/2014/5/6/5687460/mondo-will-re-release-jurassic-park-soundtrack-on-vinyl-next-month)

Don't have a vinyl player myself but it'll make for a nice addition to my JP collection.

People still use vinyl, not just old people and music snobs?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 20, 2014, 04:06:05 PM
I guess? :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on May 20, 2014, 04:08:45 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on May 20, 2014, 04:05:36 PM
People still use vinyl, not just old people and music snobs?
It's just a collectors thing.

As if transferring a digital recording to vinyl is going to make it sound better :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 20, 2014, 04:23:51 PM
Quote from: BANE on May 20, 2014, 03:50:24 PM
Quote from: Erik Lehnsherr on May 20, 2014, 03:08:46 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on May 20, 2014, 03:07:20 PM
STOP DERAILING THE THREAD ERIK GOD

Why?

Jurassic Park is so boooring.
Shut your god damned mouth.

f**king tell him.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The1PerfectOrganism on May 20, 2014, 04:40:26 PM
Quote from: BANE on May 20, 2014, 03:50:24 PM
Quote from: Erik Lehnsherr on May 20, 2014, 03:08:46 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on May 20, 2014, 03:07:20 PM
STOP DERAILING THE THREAD ERIK GOD

Why?

Jurassic Park is so boooring.
Shut your god damned mouth.

It's good entertainment, but it certainly ain't interesting.
In my opinion at least, a book actually about dinosaurs from the Jurassic period would be more interesting.
The film's universe isn't all that great to me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 20, 2014, 05:03:49 PM
Quote from: Erik Lehnsherr on May 20, 2014, 04:40:26 PM
Quote from: BANE on May 20, 2014, 03:50:24 PM
Quote from: Erik Lehnsherr on May 20, 2014, 03:08:46 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on May 20, 2014, 03:07:20 PM
STOP DERAILING THE THREAD ERIK GOD

Why?

Jurassic Park is so boooring.
Shut your god damned mouth.

It's good entertainment, but it certainly ain't interesting.
In my opinion at least, a book actually about dinosaurs from the Jurassic period would be more interesting.
The film's universe isn't all that great to me.
What did I say?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The1PerfectOrganism on May 20, 2014, 05:07:27 PM
Nothing I'mma listen to.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on May 20, 2014, 09:22:14 PM
shut your f**king mouth
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The1PerfectOrganism on May 20, 2014, 09:33:15 PM
LOL
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 20, 2014, 09:52:33 PM
Quote from: Erik Lehnsherr on May 20, 2014, 04:40:26 PM
Quote from: BANE on May 20, 2014, 03:50:24 PM
Quote from: Erik Lehnsherr on May 20, 2014, 03:08:46 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on May 20, 2014, 03:07:20 PM
STOP DERAILING THE THREAD ERIK GOD

Why?

Jurassic Park is so boooring.
Shut your god damned mouth.

It's good entertainment, but it certainly ain't interesting.
In my opinion at least, a book actually about dinosaurs from the Jurassic period would be more interesting.
The film's universe isn't all that great to me.

Now THIS is insulting!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The1PerfectOrganism on May 20, 2014, 10:09:33 PM
I don't understand how, the first film is a modern classic.
I just don't understand what's so great about the universe it created.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on May 20, 2014, 10:11:36 PM
You are to young to see it in theaters and be amaze at it on the big screen.  I was seven when it came out and saw it three times.  Very few movies like it at the time. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The1PerfectOrganism on May 20, 2014, 10:14:32 PM
Did I not mention that it's a landmark and a classic over and over?

I'm not asking that- I'm asking what's so appealing about it's world today- that two (soon to be three) sequels have been made.
Arguably none of them good so far.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naissus on May 20, 2014, 10:18:22 PM
It would seem more realistic to follow the theme of life finds a way.  But rather than dinosaurs escaping a virus or disease causing an epidemic.  The only way to find a cure is to go to the heart of the problem, Site B.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on May 20, 2014, 10:24:53 PM
Quote from: Erik Lehnsherr on May 20, 2014, 10:14:32 PM
I'm asking what's so appealing about it's world today
It's got cloned dinosaurs. People love the thought of bringing dinosaurs back to life. The movies give them that. It's really, really not that hard to see the appeal.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The1PerfectOrganism on May 20, 2014, 10:28:26 PM
Quote from: SiL on May 20, 2014, 10:24:53 PM
Quote from: Erik Lehnsherr on May 20, 2014, 10:14:32 PM
I'm asking what's so appealing about it's world today
It's got cloned dinosaurs. People love the thought of bringing dinosaurs back to life. The movies give them that. It's really, really not that hard to see the appeal.

But the first one does that, masterfully.
I just don't see the point in sequels that really don't try to do anything new.
Such as sequels to "The Matrix" or "Donnie Darko" I just feel they're unnecessary, I hope Jurassic World surprises me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on May 20, 2014, 10:30:55 PM
Quote from: Erik Lehnsherr on May 20, 2014, 10:28:26 PM
I just don't see the point in sequels that really don't try to do anything new.
Both of the sequels did something different.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The1PerfectOrganism on May 20, 2014, 10:32:30 PM
Quote from: SiL on May 20, 2014, 10:30:55 PM
Quote from: Erik Lehnsherr on May 20, 2014, 10:28:26 PM
I just don't see the point in sequels that really don't try to do anything new.
Both of the sequels did something different.

Not well. IMO.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 20, 2014, 10:37:46 PM
lost world: "There's a second island, INGEN is gonna take dinosaurs from it and build a new park in the mainland."
JP3: "A rescue mission."

The basic premises werent bad at all. Shoddy execution.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on May 20, 2014, 10:39:01 PM
Quote from: Erik Lehnsherr on May 20, 2014, 10:32:30 PM
Not well. IMO.
And? They tried something different, hence getting made.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 20, 2014, 10:39:36 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on May 20, 2014, 10:37:46 PM
lost world: "There's a second island, INGEN is building a new park."
JP3: "A rescue mission."

The basic premises werent bad at all. Shoddy execution.

And I'm assuming that the new goes something like this: Pi Patel builds a new park, and Liu Kang and Emmett Brickowski are somehow involved.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on May 20, 2014, 10:43:54 PM
Quote from: Erik Lehnsherr on May 20, 2014, 10:28:26 PM
I just don't see the point in sequels that really don't try to do anything new.

Sequel did try new stuff. And it was a book sequel before it was a movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 20, 2014, 10:48:52 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on May 20, 2014, 10:39:36 PM
And I'm assuming that the new goes something like this: Pi Patel builds a new park, and Liu Kang and Emmett Brickowski are somehow involved.

Spoiler
Jurassic World: Patel Corp build a new park, they try to create a new genetically engineered dinosaur to attract bigger crowds but it proves to be unruly... People get killed, etc. Park will probably have to be evacuated. Large scale mayhem with a bigger budget than the first 3 films.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 21, 2014, 12:12:09 AM
Quote from: Erik Lehnsherr on May 20, 2014, 10:28:26 PM
Quote from: SiL on May 20, 2014, 10:24:53 PM
Quote from: Erik Lehnsherr on May 20, 2014, 10:14:32 PM
I'm asking what's so appealing about it's world today
It's got cloned dinosaurs. People love the thought of bringing dinosaurs back to life. The movies give them that. It's really, really not that hard to see the appeal.
I just don't see the point in sequels that really don't try to do anything new.
Such as sequels to "The Matrix" or "Donnie Darko" I just feel they're unnecessary, I hope Jurassic World surprises me.
Like X-men...?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 21, 2014, 12:50:12 AM
This conversation is just the best.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on May 21, 2014, 12:52:29 AM
Quote from: BANE on May 21, 2014, 12:12:09 AM
Quote from: Erik Lehnsherr on May 20, 2014, 10:28:26 PM
Quote from: SiL on May 20, 2014, 10:24:53 PM
Quote from: Erik Lehnsherr on May 20, 2014, 10:14:32 PM
I'm asking what's so appealing about it's world today
It's got cloned dinosaurs. People love the thought of bringing dinosaurs back to life. The movies give them that. It's really, really not that hard to see the appeal.
I just don't see the point in sequels that really don't try to do anything new.
Such as sequels to "The Matrix" or "Donnie Darko" I just feel they're unnecessary, I hope Jurassic World surprises me.
Like X-men...?

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 21, 2014, 01:05:37 AM
Reflecting on TLW the novel, I'm rather glad certain elements were left out, like the raptors climbing the high hide. It sounded dumb enough in the book and I'm positive it would've looked silly in the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 21, 2014, 01:20:58 AM
Quote from: BANE on May 21, 2014, 12:12:09 AM
Quote from: Erik Lehnsherr on May 20, 2014, 10:28:26 PM
Quote from: SiL on May 20, 2014, 10:24:53 PM
Quote from: Erik Lehnsherr on May 20, 2014, 10:14:32 PM
I'm asking what's so appealing about it's world today
It's got cloned dinosaurs. People love the thought of bringing dinosaurs back to life. The movies give them that. It's really, really not that hard to see the appeal.
I just don't see the point in sequels that really don't try to do anything new.
Such as sequels to "The Matrix" or "Donnie Darko" I just feel they're unnecessary, I hope Jurassic World surprises me.
Like X-men...?

Haha!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on May 21, 2014, 03:58:09 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 21, 2014, 01:05:37 AM
Reflecting on TLW the novel, I'm rather glad certain elements were left out, like the raptors climbing the high hide. It sounded dumb enough in the book and I'm positive it would've looked silly in the film.

That part was awesome.  The raptors were the best part of The Lost World book. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 21, 2014, 05:49:41 AM
Quote from: Kimarhi on May 21, 2014, 03:58:09 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 21, 2014, 01:05:37 AM
Reflecting on TLW the novel, I'm rather glad certain elements were left out, like the raptors climbing the high hide. It sounded dumb enough in the book and I'm positive it would've looked silly in the film.

That part was awesome.  The raptors were the best part of The Lost World book.

Nah, bro. Carnotauruses.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DaddyYautja on May 21, 2014, 08:28:53 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on May 21, 2014, 05:49:41 AM
Quote from: Kimarhi on May 21, 2014, 03:58:09 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 21, 2014, 01:05:37 AM
Reflecting on TLW the novel, I'm rather glad certain elements were left out, like the raptors climbing the high hide. It sounded dumb enough in the book and I'm positive it would've looked silly in the film.

That part was awesome.  The raptors were the best part of The Lost World book.

Nah, bro. Carnotauruses.

The Stealth Carnos were kind of dumb.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on May 21, 2014, 09:31:31 AM
Quote from: Erik Lehnsherr on May 20, 2014, 10:28:26 PMSuch as sequels to "The Matrix" ... I just feel they're unnecessary.

Oi. OI. I was kind of with you, a little, up to this point. But don't you dare fart in the general direction of my beloved Matrix Revolutions.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 21, 2014, 11:09:15 AM
Quote from: Kimarhi on May 21, 2014, 03:58:09 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 21, 2014, 01:05:37 AM
Reflecting on TLW the novel, I'm rather glad certain elements were left out, like the raptors climbing the high hide. It sounded dumb enough in the book and I'm positive it would've looked silly in the film.

That part was awesome.  The raptors were the best part of The Lost World book.

Eh, I don't know. The more I envision it in my head, the sillier it seems. When did the raptors become spiders (or Aliens)?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 21, 2014, 11:10:12 AM
I don't think the raptors climbed the high hide I think they jumped up to it.

Quote from: DaddyYautja on May 21, 2014, 08:28:53 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on May 21, 2014, 05:49:41 AM
Quote from: Kimarhi on May 21, 2014, 03:58:09 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 21, 2014, 01:05:37 AM
Reflecting on TLW the novel, I'm rather glad certain elements were left out, like the raptors climbing the high hide. It sounded dumb enough in the book and I'm positive it would've looked silly in the film.

That part was awesome.  The raptors were the best part of The Lost World book.

Nah, bro. Carnotauruses.

The Stealth Carnos were kind of dumb.
Come on. Come. On.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The1PerfectOrganism on May 21, 2014, 11:50:20 AM
Quote from: BANE on May 21, 2014, 12:12:09 AM
Like X-men...?

Wut- X-Men has an interesting universe with many more elements and storylines to build from, not to mention two of it's sequels are better than the original.

I think the best thing ever done with the Matrix outside of the original was the Animatrix for instance.
That stuff made the world more interesting, but I feel if you look at "The Matrix" on it's own, my interpretation from Neo seeing everything in code at the end, was he had won. There was no need for sequels at all.

Jurassic Park- is a masterpiece and IMO trying to make a sequel to it is like trying to make a sequel to Jaws, sure it has the possiblity of coming out good but more than likely it'll only be a vapid rehash of the original.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 21, 2014, 11:52:16 AM
Quote from: BANE on May 21, 2014, 11:10:12 AM
I don't think the raptors climbed the high hide I think they jumped up to it.

Quote from: DaddyYautja on May 21, 2014, 08:28:53 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on May 21, 2014, 05:49:41 AM
Quote from: Kimarhi on May 21, 2014, 03:58:09 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 21, 2014, 01:05:37 AM
Reflecting on TLW the novel, I'm rather glad certain elements were left out, like the raptors climbing the high hide. It sounded dumb enough in the book and I'm positive it would've looked silly in the film.

That part was awesome.  The raptors were the best part of The Lost World book.

Nah, bro. Carnotauruses.

The Stealth Carnos were kind of dumb.
Come on. Come. On.

Yeah the high hide wasn't as high in the book compared to the movie, from what I remember.

Stealth Carnos were terrifying.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on May 21, 2014, 11:54:59 AM
You are not allowed to revisit something great because it won't be as good the second time unless it is good then go ahead.

Ok got it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The1PerfectOrganism on May 21, 2014, 11:57:50 AM
Quote from: bloodinthemud on May 21, 2014, 11:54:59 AM
You are not allowed to revisit something great because it won't be as good the second time unless it is good then go ahead.

Ok got it.

No, just don't rehash the same basic concept, have a really good reason to make a sequel before you make one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 21, 2014, 12:25:42 PM
Quote from: Erik Lehnsherr on May 21, 2014, 11:50:20 AM
Quote from: BANE on May 21, 2014, 12:12:09 AM
Like X-men...?

Wut- X-Men has an interesting universe with many more elements and storylines to build from, not to mention two of it's sequels are better than the original
None of which have anything new besides the odd added power or two. Rehash of the same basic concept:

Mutants fighting. If they're not fighting each other they're fighting normal people.

Still fun though. Still worth watching. But still...

Quote from: xeno-kaname on May 21, 2014, 11:52:16 AM
Yeah the high hide wasn't as high in the book compared to the movie, from what I remember.

Stealth Carnos were terrifying.
Yep.

And if they did the Carnos as Michael wrote it in the book it would be an awesome scene.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The1PerfectOrganism on May 21, 2014, 12:45:06 PM
Quote from: BANE on May 21, 2014, 12:25:42 PM
Quote from: Erik Lehnsherr on May 21, 2014, 11:50:20 AM
Quote from: BANE on May 21, 2014, 12:12:09 AM
Like X-men...?

Wut- X-Men has an interesting universe with many more elements and storylines to build from, not to mention two of it's sequels are better than the original
None of which have anything new besides the odd added power or two. Rehash of the same basic concept:

Mutants fighting. If they're not fighting each other they're fighting normal people.

Still fun though. Still worth watching. But still...


That's unfairly dumbing it down, X-Men is always going to be about the oppressed in society.
But within that you can go in loads of different directions.
-Sexuality
-Anarchy
-Eugenics

Just like Jurassic Park is always going to be about resurrected Dinosaurs.

I guess my problem is the fact that Jurassic Park has only ever looked at it from one angle effectively, maybe two if you like "The Lost World" I don't think the sequels have brought anything new to the table, and so far from what we've been hearing from Jurassic World, it sounds like Jurassic Park works better as a standalone.
But I hope I'm wrong.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 21, 2014, 02:14:22 PM
Quote from: Erik Lehnsherr on May 21, 2014, 12:45:06 PM
That's unfairly dumbing it down, X-Men is always going to be about the oppressed in society.
Oh wow, oppressed superhumans.  ::) Boo hoo.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The1PerfectOrganism on May 21, 2014, 02:26:41 PM
Quote from: BANE on May 21, 2014, 02:14:22 PM

Oh wow, oppressed superhumans.  ::) Boo hoo.

Oh wow, you couldn't have done better than that? ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 21, 2014, 02:53:07 PM
Quote from: BANE on May 21, 2014, 12:25:42 PM
Quote from: Erik Lehnsherr on May 21, 2014, 11:50:20 AM
Quote from: BANE on May 21, 2014, 12:12:09 AM
Like X-men...?

Wut- X-Men has an interesting universe with many more elements and storylines to build from, not to mention two of it's sequels are better than the original
None of which have anything new besides the odd added power or two. Rehash of the same basic concept:

Mutants fighting. If they're not fighting each other they're fighting normal people.

Still fun though. Still worth watching. But still...

Quote from: xeno-kaname on May 21, 2014, 11:52:16 AM
Yeah the high hide wasn't as high in the book compared to the movie, from what I remember.

Stealth Carnos were terrifying.
Yep.

And if they did the Carnos as Michael wrote it in the book it would be an awesome scene.

I was going to mention all this too but you saved me the trouble  ;D It's one of the reasons why enjoyed The Wolverine so much. It wasn't a rehash. Really, the characters are the main draw of the X-Men movies. You've got the classics and then the new mutants showcasing thsir new powers. In the end the enemy or threat doesn't matter as much.

Jurassic Park doesn't have as much source material as X-Men or nearly as much characters, but there are plenty of dinosaurs to be seen and the sub plot of humans cloning and engineering dinosaurs and the dangers of that has a lot of material. Some of it can be stupid (like hybrids) but there's plenty of stuff to supply a franchise. It's a worthy universe.

I would personally want to see the dinosaurs escape into the mainland and begin breeding tbere. Altering ecosystems as they spread. A bit on the silly side but I think it's a natural progression. Movie is already called Jurassic World too. Probably will happen at the end of the movie :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 21, 2014, 02:55:15 PM
Quote from: Erik Lehnsherr on May 21, 2014, 02:26:41 PM
Quote from: BANE on May 21, 2014, 02:14:22 PM

Oh wow, oppressed superhumans.  ::) Boo hoo.

Oh wow, you couldn't have done better than that? ::)
Could have.

Wasted enough time though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 21, 2014, 04:11:23 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on May 21, 2014, 02:53:07 PM
I would personally want to see the dinosaurs escape into the mainland and begin breeding tbere. Altering ecosystems as they spread. A bit on the silly side but I think it's a natural progression. Movie is already called Jurassic World too. Probably will happen at the end of the movie :P

Why? What would be done with a story like that? Humans would wipe them out in no time at all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on May 21, 2014, 04:20:47 PM
Depends on where they got loose.  Not everybody has infrared can shoot you from a hovering helicopter from 2 miles away abilities. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 21, 2014, 04:22:11 PM
But someone else will. Help can be sent.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on May 21, 2014, 04:36:05 PM
Stopping an initial infestation would be easier than if dinosaurs were suddenly everywhere.  People have too much faith in technology.  We've had a rampant cannabis growing problem in Kentucky since twenty years before I was born because people can't see below the canopies of the deciduous forest.  If they can't stop weed from growing how they gonna stop dinosaurs from trekking around under cover?  Maybe big rexes but man sized raptors?

Also people always never consider politics in this scenario.  Your country isn't going to want to lob around artillery on its home turf.  And no one is going to want to throw around artillery on a friendlies turf either.  And just because first world countries have advanced imaging techniques doesn't mean a third world country is going to want you to come in anyways. 

Dudes with AKs, cell phones, and artillery shells have drawn out the conflict with the most technologically efficient coalition in history for a variety of reasons.  Never underestimate any opponent. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 21, 2014, 04:42:52 PM
Well, help would have to be asked for, barring some imperialist power screaming about liberty and life and all that jazz.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on May 21, 2014, 04:45:46 PM
So I'm assuming the dinosaurs are going to try to take over the world in this one?    :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 21, 2014, 04:54:35 PM
They arent.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 21, 2014, 05:09:03 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 21, 2014, 04:11:23 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on May 21, 2014, 02:53:07 PM
I would personally want to see the dinosaurs escape into the mainland and begin breeding tbere. Altering ecosystems as they spread. A bit on the silly side but I think it's a natural progression. Movie is already called Jurassic World too. Probably will happen at the end of the movie :P

Why? What would be done with a story like that? Humans would wipe them out in no time at all.

It would be Planet of the Apes with dinos.  No thanks.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DaddyYautja on May 21, 2014, 05:12:38 PM
Quote from: BANE on May 21, 2014, 11:10:12 AM

Quote
The Stealth Carnos were kind of dumb.
Come on. Come. On.

If they did a JP movie where they crossed genes like that toy line they would make more sense but just straight up Dinos? Nope.
Then again, people dont know jack about dinos so they probably would not know. But the JP movies have slowly kept up with what is going on with dino findings.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 21, 2014, 05:22:32 PM
I think if it was done tastefully like in the book it would be great.

If they used them excessively for stupid jump scares then I agree.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 21, 2014, 05:22:39 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 21, 2014, 05:09:03 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 21, 2014, 04:11:23 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on May 21, 2014, 02:53:07 PM
I would personally want to see the dinosaurs escape into the mainland and begin breeding tbere. Altering ecosystems as they spread. A bit on the silly side but I think it's a natural progression. Movie is already called Jurassic World too. Probably will happen at the end of the movie :P

Why? What would be done with a story like that? Humans would wipe them out in no time at all.

It would be Planet of the Apes with dinos.  No thanks.

Dinosaurs with British accents and riding horses, yeah, definitely no thanks.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 21, 2014, 05:40:03 PM
Lol.  We can get a Paul Giamatti raptor.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on May 21, 2014, 05:41:09 PM
jurassic park and planet of the apes crossover plz
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on May 21, 2014, 07:08:11 PM
That's probably what the sequel will be. 


Eventually elemental dinosaur monkeys will take over the earth and only Squall and Cloud can save the day and prevent earth's destruction. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 21, 2014, 07:41:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 21, 2014, 05:22:39 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 21, 2014, 05:09:03 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 21, 2014, 04:11:23 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on May 21, 2014, 02:53:07 PM
I would personally want to see the dinosaurs escape into the mainland and begin breeding tbere. Altering ecosystems as they spread. A bit on the silly side but I think it's a natural progression. Movie is already called Jurassic World too. Probably will happen at the end of the movie :P

Why? What would be done with a story like that? Humans would wipe them out in no time at all.

It would be Planet of the Apes with dinos.  No thanks.

Dinosaurs with British accents and riding horses, yeah, definitely no thanks.

Hugo Weaving T. rex pls
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on May 21, 2014, 07:44:27 PM
It would be awesome when he roared, "HELLO MR ANDERSON."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 21, 2014, 07:45:29 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on May 21, 2014, 07:41:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 21, 2014, 05:22:39 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 21, 2014, 05:09:03 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 21, 2014, 04:11:23 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on May 21, 2014, 02:53:07 PM
I would personally want to see the dinosaurs escape into the mainland and begin breeding tbere. Altering ecosystems as they spread. A bit on the silly side but I think it's a natural progression. Movie is already called Jurassic World too. Probably will happen at the end of the movie :P

Why? What would be done with a story like that? Humans would wipe them out in no time at all.

It would be Planet of the Apes with dinos.  No thanks.

Dinosaurs with British accents and riding horses, yeah, definitely no thanks.

Hugo Weaving T. rex pls

Wearing sunglasses and an ear piece.

"Mister Malcolm"

Quote from: Kimarhi on May 21, 2014, 07:44:27 PM
It would be awesome when he roared, "HELLO MR ANDERSON."

Got Ninja'd lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: stephen on May 21, 2014, 10:50:51 PM
Quote from: BANE on May 21, 2014, 05:22:32 PM
I think if it was done tastefully like in the book it would be great.

If they used them excessively for stupid jump scares then I agree.

Agreed.

Michael didn't overuse them in the book at all.  There was kind of a build up to it with the Raptors chasing the humans and not wanting to go into that territory and all of that.  It had the potential to be completely overused but it was kind of kept to a single scene with some subtle hints and build up through the book.

Worked really well in my opinion.

I fear that if they tried to amp the carno's up in a movie it would come off as silly.  It would come off as "invisible" dinosaurs which I think people would roll their eyes at.

If kept to a scene similar to the book, it would kind of work hopefully.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 21, 2014, 10:57:28 PM
Do we know why they didnt use Carnotaurus in the second film? Problems with realizing the special effects for the camouflage? :P Or did Spielbergums think Raptors + The T-rex were enough?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 22, 2014, 01:17:03 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on May 21, 2014, 07:45:29 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on May 21, 2014, 07:41:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 21, 2014, 05:22:39 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 21, 2014, 05:09:03 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 21, 2014, 04:11:23 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on May 21, 2014, 02:53:07 PM
I would personally want to see the dinosaurs escape into the mainland and begin breeding tbere. Altering ecosystems as they spread. A bit on the silly side but I think it's a natural progression. Movie is already called Jurassic World too. Probably will happen at the end of the movie :P

Why? What would be done with a story like that? Humans would wipe them out in no time at all.

It would be Planet of the Apes with dinos.  No thanks.

Dinosaurs with British accents and riding horses, yeah, definitely no thanks.

Hugo Weaving T. rex pls

Wearing sunglasses and an ear piece.

"Mister Malcolm"

Quote from: Kimarhi on May 21, 2014, 07:44:27 PM
It would be awesome when he roared, "HELLO MR ANDERSON."

Got Ninja'd lol

Lmao

Quote from: stephen on May 21, 2014, 10:50:51 PM
Quote from: BANE on May 21, 2014, 05:22:32 PM
I think if it was done tastefully like in the book it would be great.

If they used them excessively for stupid jump scares then I agree.

Agreed.

Michael didn't overuse them in the book at all.  There was kind of a build up to it with the Raptors chasing the humans and not wanting to go into that territory and all of that.  It had the potential to be completely overused but it was kind of kept to a single scene with some subtle hints and build up through the book.

Worked really well in my opinion.

I fear that if they tried to amp the carno's up in a movie it would come off as silly.  It would come off as "invisible" dinosaurs which I think people would roll their eyes at.

If kept to a scene similar to the book, it would kind of work hopefully.

This!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on May 22, 2014, 07:11:24 AM
I can see why they go with the splice dinosaur DNA with other species idea. Just think of the major toy line that they can come up with that idea. I don't like the idea, but I hope they can pull it off. I rather have them go back to the roots of the first movie and revisit the park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 22, 2014, 01:36:27 PM
Chaos Effect took it to an extreme. I'm pretty sure this would look ridiculous if they turned it into a big-budget movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 22, 2014, 01:52:26 PM
I'm expecting the
Spoiler
"trained dinos" thing to be a rumor, based on John Sayles campy fun "moonraker-esque" "trashterpiece" script for JP4.
[close]
But i do expect the rumour of a
Spoiler
spliced hybrid dino to be true.. as it lines up with Colin Trevorrow's previous comments.
Arent there a few lines in the Jurassic Park novel where they say that they were genetically engineering the dinosaurs to "meet the expectations of the crowds" instead of aiming for realism? The next logical step would be to build their own species, then... in the neverending aim to draw in bigger crowds. :P Maybe they were trying to bring back a Raptorex and decided the real one didnt meet the expectations of the crowd for a creature with that name... so the new corporation just decided "what the hell, we'll just mix genes of Rex and Raptor then... oh and add genes of snake and cuttlefish while we're at it."
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 22, 2014, 02:02:50 PM
I refused to read those possible spoilers so I'd appreciate spoiler tags just in case that stuff is true  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 22, 2014, 03:16:22 PM
Possible name of the new dinosaur...

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=100543 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=100543)

Spoiler
Diabolus Rex... And the name just sounds so fan wanky. Will it have horns? :laugh: Yeah i think this rumour is losing credibility by the day...
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 22, 2014, 03:29:03 PM
Wow.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 22, 2014, 04:33:12 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on May 22, 2014, 01:52:26 PM
Spoiler
Arent there a few lines in the Jurassic Park novel where they say that they were genetically engineering the dinosaurs to "meet the expectations of the crowds" instead of aiming for realism?
[close]
Wu said they could, not that they did.

Regardless -- the novel dinosaurs are mutants and the reader is implicitly and explicitly told that multiple times.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 22, 2014, 04:36:33 PM
I guess
Spoiler
Trevorrow reread the novel looked at that line and thought "THAT" is what we're gonna do. It makes sense. There's a new park. It's been opened for a while. Wu, keeping the characterization from the novel would try to take genetic engineering further.
[close]

Dr. Wu is the one returning character from the first film to Jurassic World btw.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 22, 2014, 04:43:29 PM
The only thing Wu wanted to do was make them slower (because the dinosaurs were fast as hell) to meet the expectations visitors might have of them as being big slow and dumb.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 22, 2014, 04:47:10 PM
yeah i can see why they would want to change that for the film.  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 22, 2014, 04:47:15 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on May 22, 2014, 04:36:33 PM
I guess
Spoiler
Trevorrow reread the novel looked at that line and thought "THAT" is what we're gonna do. It makes sense. There's a new park. It's been opened for a while. Wu, keeping the characterization from the novel would try to take genetic engineering further.
[close]

Dr. Wu is the one returning character from the first film to Jurassic World btw.

Exactly
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on May 22, 2014, 04:48:09 PM
Having reread JP recently, I was surprised at the dialogue between Hammond and Wu that I'd forgotten about. He wanted to do more than that, I think, Banum^ :P He was talking about the potential they had for modifying them, and how he felt restricted by the demands Hammond had placed on him iirc.

Too bad he gets disemboweled by raptors in the book tho. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 22, 2014, 04:51:16 PM
Yea, surprising how most of the folks that died in the book survived in the film, and vice versa.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 22, 2014, 04:52:18 PM
surprising?

Or "convenient" to make sequels?  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 22, 2014, 04:56:58 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on May 22, 2014, 04:52:18 PM
surprising?

Or "convenient" to make sequels?  :laugh:

Well, I mean, Muldoon survived in the novel, but was brutally murdered in the film.  It would have been cool seeing Bob Peck return along side Pete Postlethwaite hunting dinos in TLW, but honestly, the hunter becoming prey execution that the film took was a clever choice too (no pun intended)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on May 22, 2014, 05:00:52 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 22, 2014, 04:56:58 PM
Well, I mean, Muldoon survived in the novel, but was brutally murdered in the film.  It would have been cool seeing Bob Peck return along side Pete Postlethwaite hunting dinos in TLW, but honestly, the hunter becoming prey execution that the film took was a clever choice too (no pun intended)
What you did there...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-DS7scH_tI4U%2FUWBwocxITmI%2FAAAAAAAADdo%2F_OCld9oZbnE%2Fs1600%2Fjurassic%2Bpark_raptor%2Bat%2Bthe%2Bwindow.jpg&hash=24faf71ece647779b1567de4701f85381ec118bd)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 22, 2014, 05:03:51 PM
Quote from: RagingDragon on May 22, 2014, 05:00:52 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on May 22, 2014, 04:56:58 PM
Well, I mean, Muldoon survived in the novel, but was brutally murdered in the film.  It would have been cool seeing Bob Peck return along side Pete Postlethwaite hunting dinos in TLW, but honestly, the hunter becoming prey execution that the film took was a clever choice too (no pun intended)
What you did there...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-DS7scH_tI4U%2FUWBwocxITmI%2FAAAAAAAADdo%2F_OCld9oZbnE%2Fs1600%2Fjurassic%2Bpark_raptor%2Bat%2Bthe%2Bwindow.jpg&hash=24faf71ece647779b1567de4701f85381ec118bd)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-iz9r-9iErMo%2FUZSU18VfzNI%2FAAAAAAAAAMk%2F79PN9NtWC8c%2Fs1600%2Ftumblr_m9v4wegL7B1qbhmtm.gif&hash=d012c03d7d01601314aaeaa7592ee0f281f3c997)

Spoiler
f**k, I hope we get good animatronic shots like that again!
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DJ Pu$$yface on May 22, 2014, 10:30:50 PM
Is Dr Wu the one from the lab in the first movie with only about two lines of dialogue?  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 22, 2014, 11:20:07 PM
Yap.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ShadowPred on May 22, 2014, 11:27:09 PM
Dr. Wu is the f**king shiz.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 22, 2014, 11:29:54 PM
This is the first I'm hearing of Wu's return. That's pretty sweet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 22, 2014, 11:31:38 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on May 22, 2014, 11:29:54 PM
This is the first I'm hearing of Wu's return. That's pretty sweet.

Quote from: ShadowPred on May 22, 2014, 11:27:09 PM
Dr. Wu is the f**king shiz.

Wu-hoo
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on May 22, 2014, 11:32:47 PM
I'm curious what fiendish antics Dr. Wu will get up to in this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 23, 2014, 12:05:12 AM
I hope he's retired and delivers Chinese Food to the island.

Then realizes what's going on and either freaks the hell out or starts heckling their genetics.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 23, 2014, 12:10:15 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on May 22, 2014, 11:32:47 PM
I'm curious what fiendish antics Dr. Wu will get up to in this.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstream1.gifsoup.com%2Fview%2F1021671%2Ffu-manchu-o.gif&hash=c91381bbb19b2a19714421801c4bd93f0259af89)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 23, 2014, 12:18:41 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BuFL8Le1Pqk# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BuFL8Le1Pqk#)

QuoteYour knowledge of scientific biologic transmografications... is only outmached by your zest for KUNG FU TREACHERY.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: War Wager on May 23, 2014, 12:59:52 AM
JW visitors map leaked:

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F7XsQZSR.jpg&hash=8722906491e277dde7ba39a5f81c238562fca6bf)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fqrusgn3.jpg&hash=0b59547ff51320ced0cb4a5ed16e6e25333164b6)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F2c7ZA44.jpg&hash=3916f281bf84ab7240a3a342b327516e1999198c)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FaANhqeu.jpg&hash=8f54112ab6673421aa179e92c1d6fcffc36cb343)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FGb0rnws.jpg&hash=011006d5611fae3fa60bad59e3791e95979565e9)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FzcghhhA.jpg&hash=5dc3abaa58a5cebac7b3e24396a285181e4aae99)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 23, 2014, 01:02:53 AM
Quote from: War Wager on May 23, 2014, 12:59:52 AM
JW visitors map leaked:

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F7XsQZSR.jpg&hash=8722906491e277dde7ba39a5f81c238562fca6bf)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fqrusgn3.jpg&hash=0b59547ff51320ced0cb4a5ed16e6e25333164b6)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F2c7ZA44.jpg&hash=3916f281bf84ab7240a3a342b327516e1999198c)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FaANhqeu.jpg&hash=8f54112ab6673421aa179e92c1d6fcffc36cb343)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FGb0rnws.jpg&hash=011006d5611fae3fa60bad59e3791e95979565e9)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FzcghhhA.jpg&hash=5dc3abaa58a5cebac7b3e24396a285181e4aae99)
[close]

Spoiler
Hell yeah, they included the river ride/aviary from the original book. 8)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 23, 2014, 01:16:38 AM
Spoiler
GYROSPHERE. That was referenced in the leaked plot outline. I guess it was real, then. :P Guess we are gonna get the "Diabolus Rex" engineered dino. And i dont see any Velociraptor pen this time... guess the management of this new park is smarter. :laugh:


[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 23, 2014, 01:26:44 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on May 23, 2014, 01:16:38 AM
Spoiler
GYROSPHERE. That was referenced in the leaked plot outline. I guess it was real, then. :P Guess we are gonna get the "Diabolus Rex" engineered dino. And i dont see any Velociraptor pen this time... guess the management of this new park is smarter. :laugh:


[close]
I'm starting to think this is going to suck...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 23, 2014, 01:36:12 AM
I was gonna say that this time there's a good director in charge and a good cast...

but we also had those the last two times. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 23, 2014, 01:38:30 AM
I really wanted to see raptors in an open field running really fast.  :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on May 23, 2014, 01:39:17 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on May 23, 2014, 01:36:12 AM
I was gonna say that this time there's a good director in charge
Nope. I watched his debut and it was terrible indie-romcom shit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 23, 2014, 01:41:34 AM
Lolz. He's so shit that he made a critically aclaimed terrible indie-romcom. 91%. I guess he failed upwards then. http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/safety_not_guaranteed/ (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/safety_not_guaranteed/)

:P

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on May 23, 2014, 01:41:59 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on May 23, 2014, 01:39:17 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on May 23, 2014, 01:36:12 AM
I was gonna say that this time there's a good director in charge
Nope. I watched his debut and it was terrible indie-romcom shit.
[/quote

Safety Not Guaranteed was marvelous you heathen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on May 23, 2014, 01:44:55 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on May 23, 2014, 01:41:34 AM
Lolz. He's so shit that he made a film a critically aclaimed terrible indie-romcom. 91%. http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/safety_not_guaranteed/ (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/safety_not_guaranteed/)

:P
They're wrong. It's shit :-* Tired, energy-free twee indie junk about a hip alternachick falling for a manchild with lots of lame jokes and a stupid genre twist ending for nerds to fawn over.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 23, 2014, 01:45:39 AM
"this movie didnt appeal to my specific tastes therefore it's shite."

:D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on May 23, 2014, 01:47:32 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on May 23, 2014, 01:45:39 AM
"this movie didnt appeal to my specific tastes therefore it's shite."

:D
More like, "this movie is a baggy, draggy mess of indie quirk cliches with no real wit" :)

Have you seen it?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 23, 2014, 01:49:38 AM
Nope. I got a ton of other films to catch up on.

Dracula's Daughter is about to finish d'loading. O.o That one's next.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rong on May 23, 2014, 01:49:51 AM
I tried to watch safety not guaranteed... turned it off after about 15mins.

Mark Webb v2.0
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on May 23, 2014, 01:51:37 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Dz_nQYwkl4#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Dz_nQYwkl4#ws)

91% A MASTERPIECE FOR THE AGES TRULY
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on May 23, 2014, 01:52:36 AM
More revered than Under the Skin  :-*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on May 23, 2014, 01:54:27 AM
Lulz, yeah, we'll see which one tops more Best of the Decade lists, Aspie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 23, 2014, 01:56:56 AM
lolz. Neither.

Both will be forgotten.  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on May 23, 2014, 01:58:06 AM
DID BETTER BUSINESS, MORE ACCLAIMED.


Those Best of the Decades lists gonna have to be long in order to include both of them, with UTS fighting Prometheus for a bottom spot.  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on May 23, 2014, 01:59:49 AM
aspie came in like a wrecking ball
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on May 23, 2014, 02:00:58 AM
I just closed my eyes and swunggggggggggg
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 23, 2014, 02:01:49 AM
Begone with your shit tier pop music.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on May 23, 2014, 02:03:42 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on May 23, 2014, 01:56:56 AM
lolz. Neither.

Both will be forgotten.
Nah, that's the Jurassic Park sequels you're thinking.

And this one will join them.

Quote from: KiramidHead on May 23, 2014, 02:01:49 AM
Begone with your shit tier pop music.
As well as his shit tier film tastes ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on May 23, 2014, 02:04:07 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on May 23, 2014, 02:01:49 AM
Begone with your shit tier pop music.


r.i.p. ur shit opinion regarding queen miley
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 23, 2014, 02:04:34 AM
Quote from: Aspie on May 23, 2014, 02:04:07 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on May 23, 2014, 02:01:49 AM
Begone with your shit tier pop music.


r.i.p. ur shit opinion regarding queen whore

whatever asspee
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on May 23, 2014, 02:05:07 AM
Aspie, tell us how Taylor Swift is better than Pink Floyd or something.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on May 23, 2014, 02:05:44 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on May 23, 2014, 01:51:37 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Dz_nQYwkl4#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Dz_nQYwkl4#ws)

91% A MASTERPIECE FOR THE AGES TRULY
Is this a documentary about the birth of the guitar douchebag?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs2.quickmeme.com%2Fimg%2Fb9%2Fb94972636140ce759f3f5216f4a49f9e296da5dc1a3e35054fe5ecfd7584accb.jpg&hash=0b8a7edaff061880581095a213146d763143e010)

How dare you post such shitty shit and the shits in our beloved Jurassic Park thread. :laugh:

I must purge these shitties...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc07.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2Ff%2F2011%2F238%2Fa%2Fc%2Fac9a36af9f95a936dc2503488c70b928-d47xswe.jpg&hash=997cdd743673861e297cb289040d91efbf377642)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on May 23, 2014, 02:06:49 AM
Quote from: RagingDragon on May 23, 2014, 02:05:44 AM
How dare you post such shitty shit and the shits in our beloved Jurassic Park thread. :laugh:
But Aspie says it's a critically acclaimed masterpiece, Rage. And it's from the director of your new Jurassic Park movie! ???
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on May 23, 2014, 02:07:39 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on May 23, 2014, 02:03:42 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on May 23, 2014, 02:01:49 AM
Begone with your shit tier pop music.
As well as his shit tier film tastes ;D


Quote from: Cvalda on May 23, 2014, 02:05:07 AM
Aspie, tell us how Taylor Swift is better than Pink Floyd or something.


Quote from: Cvalda on May 23, 2014, 02:06:49 AM
Quote from: RagingDragon on May 23, 2014, 02:05:44 AM
How dare you post such shitty shit and the shits in our beloved Jurassic Park thread. :laugh:
But Aspie says it's a critically acclaimed masterpiece, Rage. And it's from the director of your new Jurassic Park movie! ???


did I just hear


some rustling
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 23, 2014, 02:09:47 AM
jimmies?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 23, 2014, 02:10:18 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on May 23, 2014, 02:09:47 AM
jimmies?

JIMMAY!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 23, 2014, 02:11:08 AM
1) Safety Not Guaranteed sucks. The end.

2) Miley Cyrus sucks. The ends (of lots of cocks).

3) Aspie, why are you listening to Rotten Tomatoes anyway? Shouldn't you be boycotting them after they just gave Adam Sandlers' recent masterpiece 6%?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on May 23, 2014, 02:11:54 AM
Quote from: Aspie on May 23, 2014, 02:07:39 AM
did I just hear


some rustling
No, that was just my zither, Aspie.

Let me play you a song on it :-*

Spoiler


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OK4fJhbRL1g# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OK4fJhbRL1g#)

[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 23, 2014, 02:12:13 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on May 23, 2014, 02:10:18 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on May 23, 2014, 02:09:47 AM
jimmies?

JIMMAY!

PAGE.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iP9xMobANJM# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iP9xMobANJM#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on May 23, 2014, 02:12:58 AM
A BANE BURN!

A BARN!

Quote from: Cvalda on May 23, 2014, 02:11:54 AM
Quote from: Aspie on May 23, 2014, 02:07:39 AM
did I just hear


some rustling
No, that was just my zither, Aspie.

Let me play you a song on it :-*

Quote

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OK4fJhbRL1g (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OK4fJhbRL1g)


:D ;D :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on May 23, 2014, 02:14:35 AM
Quote from: BANE on May 23, 2014, 02:11:08 AM
3) Aspie, why are you listening to Rotten Tomatoes anyway? Shouldn't you be boycotting them after they just gave Adam Sandlers' recent masterpiece 6%?

omg bane it's common knowledge that Sandler movies on RT are inversely scored


Quote from: Cvalda on May 23, 2014, 02:11:54 AM
Quote from: Aspie on May 23, 2014, 02:07:39 AM
did I just hear


some rustling
No, that was just my zither, Aspie.

Let me play you a song on it :-*

Quote

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OK4fJhbRL1g (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OK4fJhbRL1g)



hehehehehe
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 23, 2014, 02:15:50 AM
Quote from: Aspie on May 23, 2014, 02:14:35 AM
Quote from: BANE on May 23, 2014, 02:11:08 AM
3) Aspie, why are you listening to Rotten Tomatoes anyway? Shouldn't you be boycotting them after they just gave Adam Sandlers' recent masterpiece 6%?

omg bane it's common knowledge that Sandler movies on RT are inversely scored

But by that logic his earlier movies are worse.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on May 23, 2014, 02:18:19 AM
pfffft most of his earlier movies are like in the 50 percentile :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on May 23, 2014, 02:26:16 AM
That map...do my eyes deceive me!? :o

Spoiler
MOSASAUR!!! ;D ;D ;D
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 23, 2014, 02:50:11 AM
The map pretty much confirms that this early
Spoiler
plot leak from last year was true.

http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/exclusive-spoilers-awesome-details-on-the-story-and-concept-for-jurassic-park-iv (http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/exclusive-spoilers-awesome-details-on-the-story-and-concept-for-jurassic-park-iv)
[close]

Spoiler
Open Park. Lagoon. Mosasaur feeding show. Yup.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 23, 2014, 03:00:15 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on May 23, 2014, 02:50:11 AM
The map pretty much confirms that this early
Spoiler
plot leak from last year was true.

http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/exclusive-spoilers-awesome-details-on-the-story-and-concept-for-jurassic-park-iv (http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/exclusive-spoilers-awesome-details-on-the-story-and-concept-for-jurassic-park-iv)
[close]

Spoiler
Open Park. Lagoon. Mosasaur feeding show. Yup.
[close]

I didn't read the article, but what you described doesn't sound too bad.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 23, 2014, 03:01:48 AM
I'm sure you'll hate this.. but the plot leaks also state that there'll be...

Spoiler
trained velociraptors.... Like in the John Sayles JP4 script. :P But this probably wont be as "campy" as that script was.. probably not as fun either...  ;D
[close]

;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 23, 2014, 03:03:56 AM
Oh f**king hell just make some living teddy bears and have a cuddling padlock or whatever.  ::)

Sounds less lame than reality.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 23, 2014, 03:05:38 AM
Well in this flick.. there is a
Spoiler
petting zoo where kids can go up close to baby Triceratops.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Flongagoandohsofaraway.files.wordpress.com%2F2013%2F04%2Ftric.gif&hash=c00bf9b3068405b0ad7eaa2746ac8e1460db44c2)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 23, 2014, 03:11:33 AM
I hope they're the first to die.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on May 23, 2014, 03:12:40 AM
Nah, this is a Jurassic Park movie. The kids in the petting zoo will all of a sudden reveal their badass hacking skillz or something and save the day.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on May 23, 2014, 03:13:47 AM
you didn't have badass hacking skills when you were a kid
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 23, 2014, 03:20:32 AM
Lex had such badass hacking skills, didn't she?

I mean, all that mouse clicking and extraordinarily simple reading things on a screen must have taken what...years of programming classes?

I don't know. I've never read things on screens before and clicked mice, so I'm way out of my depth on this one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 23, 2014, 03:22:42 AM
Worst display of reading stuff on screen EVER. Completely unbelievable. Took me right out of the film.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 23, 2014, 03:23:20 AM
Quote from: BANE on May 23, 2014, 03:20:32 AM
Lex had such badass hacking skills, didn't she?

I mean, all that mouse clicking and extraordinarily simple reading things on a screen must have taken what...years of programming classes?

I don't know. I've never read things on screens before and clicked mice, so I'm way out of my depth on this one.

Come on BANE, didn't you know? Kids are brainless idiots, incapable of even rational thought.

Quote from: Blacklabel on May 23, 2014, 03:22:42 AM
Worst display of reading stuff on screen EVER. Completely unbelievable. Took me right out of the film.  :laugh:

How?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on May 23, 2014, 03:24:13 AM
not gonna lie, if there is a dinosaur poop joke in the petting zoo scenes imm'a walk out dat movie
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 23, 2014, 03:24:25 AM
Doomrulz, your sarcasm detector is malfunctioning.

Quote from: Aspie on May 23, 2014, 03:24:13 AM
not gonna lie, if there is a dinosaur poop joke in the petting zoo scenes imm'a walk out dat movie

that's one big pile of shit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 23, 2014, 03:25:13 AM
Yeah, probably. Happens online :P

Quote from: Aspie on May 23, 2014, 03:24:13 AM
not gonna lie, if there is a dinosaur poop joke in the petting zoo scenes imm'a walk out dat movie

The f**k you think this is son? Walking With Dinosaurs: The 3D Movie?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on May 23, 2014, 03:26:51 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 23, 2014, 03:25:13 AM
Yeah, probably. Happens online :P

Quote from: Aspie on May 23, 2014, 03:24:13 AM
not gonna lie, if there is a dinosaur poop joke in the petting zoo scenes imm'a walk out dat movie

The f**k you think this is son? Walking With Dinosaurs: The 3D Movie?

Doomrulz don't make me youtube link you to a certain scene in TLW  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 23, 2014, 03:32:32 AM
You might have to because I honestly don't know what you're referring to.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on May 23, 2014, 03:33:09 AM
Raptor Gymnastics Scene.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 23, 2014, 03:33:47 AM
When he said poop joke, I assumed he meant JP 3, specifically, the Ceratosaurus scene.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on May 23, 2014, 03:34:17 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 23, 2014, 03:32:32 AM
You might have to because I honestly don't know what you're referring to.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JFfN5pKzFU# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JFfN5pKzFU#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 23, 2014, 03:35:01 AM
Quote from: Aspie on May 23, 2014, 03:26:51 AM
Doomrulz don't make me youtube link you to a certain scene in TLW  :P
Quote from: Aspie on May 23, 2014, 03:34:17 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JFfN5pKzFU# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JFfN5pKzFU#)
Are you












dumb?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 23, 2014, 03:35:08 AM
Quote from: Aspie on May 23, 2014, 03:34:17 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 23, 2014, 03:32:32 AM
You might have to because I honestly don't know what you're referring to.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JFfN5pKzFU# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JFfN5pKzFU#)

And that poop joke doesn't bother you? :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on May 23, 2014, 03:36:13 AM
wait did i mix up movies
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 23, 2014, 03:36:44 AM
Quote from: Aspie on May 23, 2014, 03:36:13 AM
wait did i mix up movies
Are you












dumb?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on May 23, 2014, 03:37:53 AM
I could've sworn that scene was from TLW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 23, 2014, 03:38:17 AM
Quote from: Aspie on May 23, 2014, 03:34:17 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 23, 2014, 03:32:32 AM
You might have to because I honestly don't know what you're referring to.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JFfN5pKzFU# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JFfN5pKzFU#)

That's harmless. It's just Ian Malcolm being Ian Malcolm.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 23, 2014, 03:40:20 AM
Quote from: Aspie on May 23, 2014, 03:37:53 AM
I could've sworn that scene was from TLW.
You are












dumb.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on May 23, 2014, 03:40:57 AM
It is from a Jurassic Park movie doe, right?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 23, 2014, 03:42:02 AM
Nope.

Independence Day prologue.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on May 23, 2014, 03:43:27 AM
fuarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrk both have Ion Malcom close enuf
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rong on May 23, 2014, 03:46:50 AM
Ian Malcom

www.youtube.com/watch?v=oocnZ8lR_jE (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oocnZ8lR_jE#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 23, 2014, 03:48:39 AM
Good God. Is it my imagination or has he seriously lost a lot of weight? He doesn't look all that good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 23, 2014, 03:49:33 AM
He's married to a contortionist gymnast half his age.

He's lost 15 kilos in ejaculate alone.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on May 23, 2014, 04:56:56 AM
Quote from: War Wager on May 23, 2014, 12:59:52 AM
JW visitors map leaked:

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F7XsQZSR.jpg&hash=8722906491e277dde7ba39a5f81c238562fca6bf)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fqrusgn3.jpg&hash=0b59547ff51320ced0cb4a5ed16e6e25333164b6)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F2c7ZA44.jpg&hash=3916f281bf84ab7240a3a342b327516e1999198c)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FaANhqeu.jpg&hash=8f54112ab6673421aa179e92c1d6fcffc36cb343)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FGb0rnws.jpg&hash=011006d5611fae3fa60bad59e3791e95979565e9)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FzcghhhA.jpg&hash=5dc3abaa58a5cebac7b3e24396a285181e4aae99)
[close]

Looks like they've done a lot of landscaping to Nublar since the first film:

JP movie map
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fencyc%2Fmaps%2Fjptourmap.jpg&hash=b79e4b686c57584c952b281b832e988ffbdad801)
[close]

Looks a bit more like the novel's, with the cleaner teardrop shape, the lagoon in the middle and the long river snaking through the east.

Spoiler
Also, Tyrannosaurus enclosure next to the visitors' centre? *claps*

Animals that look to be in the film, based on the icons:
-Rexy
-Triceratops
-Baby Triceratops (petting zoo)
-Gallimimus
-Pachycephalosaurus
-Mosasaurus
-Large pterosaur (probably Pteranodon)

So, no new dinosaurs at all so far (unless you count the baby Triceratops, for which a model was completed as far back as the first film). You can understand the need to keep Tyrannosaurus in the game, but you'd think such a major departure from the previous films could have a new selection of species. They have around a thousand of them to choose from now...

I expect there will be a few others though. There are large expanses of monorail tour with nothing particular next to them, and the cruise only seems to pass near the aviary. There must be more there that hasn't been labelled.
Wouldn't surprise me if they have some less giant reptiles in the lagoon, too. Being separated from the water park suggests it's an exhibit.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 23, 2014, 11:15:52 AM
Quote from: BANE on May 23, 2014, 03:49:33 AM
He's married to a contortionist gymnast half his age.

He's lost 15 kilos in ejaculate alone.

:D :D :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 23, 2014, 01:38:38 PM
So the map of the new park has an area called

Spoiler
Packy Arena.....

Guess we're gonna see this being staged for tourists:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.3dstereo.com%2FMerchant2%2Fgraphics%2F00000001%2Flent%2Flpc_421ml_pachy_fighting.gif&hash=d52cbb317ee313f0629856e8e8d8194d036f914f)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 23, 2014, 04:28:46 PM
If you mates are interested, I have a (sort of) spoilery surprise over at my art thread

http://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=21823.msg1926888#msg1926888 (http://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=21823.msg1926888#msg1926888)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 27, 2014, 11:41:06 AM
Colin Trevorrow tweets..,

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.mos.totalfilm.com%2Fimages%2Fb%2Fbehind-the-scenes-pic-from-jurassic-world-released-163574-a-1401172490.jpg&hash=01379fd5757bd3ed60d01055a4ae5f0367ca5987)

8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 27, 2014, 01:14:06 PM
I like the use of a familiar logo. It adds an air of authenticity to it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on May 27, 2014, 02:41:36 PM
I'm f**king pumped.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on May 27, 2014, 03:20:49 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 27, 2014, 11:41:06 AM
Colin Trevorrow tweets..,

http://cdn.mos.totalfilm.com/images/b/behind-the-scenes-pic-from-jurassic-world-released-163574-a-1401172490.jpg

8)
WHY YOU NO USE SPOILERS
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 27, 2014, 04:30:45 PM
f**ks' sake Alien3 I wanted the VETERINARIANS TO BE A SURPRISE DAMMIT!!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on May 27, 2014, 04:42:27 PM
Quote from: BANE on May 27, 2014, 04:30:45 PM
f**ks' sake Alien3 I wanted the VETERINARIANS TO BE A SURPRISE DAMMIT!!!!!

Veterinarian reveal?!?!

(https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5167/5250060463_d93f05737d_m.jpg)

f**k
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on May 27, 2014, 07:10:55 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 27, 2014, 11:41:06 AM
Colin Trevorrow tweets..,

http://cdn.mos.totalfilm.com/images/b/behind-the-scenes-pic-from-jurassic-world-released-163574-a-1401172490.jpg

8)

Nice!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on May 27, 2014, 07:22:39 PM
After seeing that map...it appears that T.Rex will be the main dino again.  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 27, 2014, 07:24:12 PM
....you are wrong. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on May 27, 2014, 07:42:52 PM
How?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on May 27, 2014, 07:44:46 PM
I think Blacklabel is referring to the
Spoiler
underwater observatory
[close]
which will probably have a big role in the film


They simply have to stick to quality and not quantity... I don't mind if they simply introduce the Mosasaur/Liopleurodon or anything underwatery and keep the rest simple and oldschool. T-Rex is cool... although I would have loved it they would've gone for an all new carnivore like the carnotaur.

Spoiler
Where the raptors?  :'(
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 27, 2014, 07:45:11 PM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on May 27, 2014, 07:42:52 PM
How?

Do you really want to know what the main bad dino will "probably" be based on the leaked plot info? :P

Really?

Then click:
Spoiler
http://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=21823.msg1926888#msg1926888
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 27, 2014, 07:47:08 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on May 27, 2014, 07:45:11 PM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on May 27, 2014, 07:42:52 PM
How?

Do you really want to know what the main bad dino will "probably" be? :P

Really?

Then click:
Spoiler
http://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=21823.msg1926888#msg1926888
[close]

That was pretty badass looking, actually.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 27, 2014, 07:48:05 PM
One can hope the real thing looks half as badass as Requiem's work. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on May 27, 2014, 08:02:59 PM
Oh, shit.

I wish I hadn't clicked it...but man. That looks really cool.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 27, 2014, 08:27:08 PM
Quote from: Cal427eb on May 27, 2014, 03:20:49 PM
WHY YOU NO USE SPOILERS

Official release motherf**kers! Non of this leaked shit from desperate attention seeking news and twitter sites.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Freactiongifs.me%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F08%2FMrs-Doubtfire-middle-finger.gif&hash=3f273d0fc06d27eb038ff6ce203eab798b08fc40)

Quote from: BANE on May 27, 2014, 04:30:45 PM
f**ks' sake Alien3 I wanted the VETERINARIANS TO BE A SURPRISE DAMMIT!!!!!

You have no idea dude. :-*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on May 27, 2014, 08:29:29 PM
Why does it matter if it was officially released or not? :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 27, 2014, 08:46:28 PM
Isn't it obvious?

The film makers are trying to tell a story.

Imagine sitting around a camp fire listening to an intense story being told by someone who is great at telling stories, only to have someone yell out little bits and pieces of information to do with the settings/plot; that you're not meant to know about yet.

That's annoying in my books.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Invader on May 28, 2014, 01:07:21 AM
The new dino makes me think of
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fightersgeneration.com%2Fnp5%2Fchar%2Fprimal%2Fdiablo.jpg&hash=7b25da20f7dbec3e7f6a84df6eddba1c0741664f)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on May 28, 2014, 01:09:39 AM
Quote from: Super Predator on May 28, 2014, 01:07:21 AM
The new dino makes me think of
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fightersgeneration.com%2Fnp5%2Fchar%2Fprimal%2Fdiablo.jpg&hash=7b25da20f7dbec3e7f6a84df6eddba1c0741664f)
[close]

Jurassic World confirmed for being the first step towards a live action Primal Rage.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on May 28, 2014, 02:04:11 AM
Some sketches I did in my English class. Spoilers
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc03.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2Fi%2F2014%2F147%2Fb%2Fc%2Fd_rex_by_godzillakuj94-d7k0rny.jpg&hash=f5c5e2569727d98b5c6e6c14b3f306457993b69d)
[close]
I really like how the top and bottom ones turned out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 28, 2014, 02:07:49 AM
This guy looks really familiar...
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi839.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fzz314%2FAintGotTime2Bleed%2FDino2_zps4adf1204.png&hash=e479dccf5aba2d1fd880f1bd51e6f8958d81b7a1)
I think I played with him 2 or 3 times today as I had the day off...

Ah, who knows.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on May 28, 2014, 05:04:36 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 27, 2014, 08:46:28 PM
Isn't it obvious?

The film makers are trying to tell a story.

Imagine sitting around a camp fire listening to an intense story being told by someone who is great at telling stories, only to have someone yell out little bits and pieces of information to do with the settings/plot; that you're not meant to know about yet.

That's annoying in my books.
:laugh:

Thanks for ruining the story by not spoiler tagging the patch.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 28, 2014, 07:29:11 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reactiongifs.us%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F05%2Fslow_clap_vanderbeek.gif&hash=1a315d39d2c67d1f965df80e4b52fb8159cb05de)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on May 28, 2014, 09:51:31 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 27, 2014, 08:46:28 PM
Isn't it obvious?

The film makers are trying to tell a story.

Imagine sitting around a camp fire listening to an intense story being told by someone who is great at telling stories, only to have someone yell out little bits and pieces of information to do with the settings/plot; that you're not meant to know about yet.

That's annoying in my books.

The film contains the story. The other stuff is just electronic hype injection.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 28, 2014, 10:55:09 AM
Really?

So that whole JoBlo thing was just trivial information.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on May 28, 2014, 11:59:40 AM
Quote from: bloodinthemud on May 28, 2014, 09:51:31 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 27, 2014, 08:46:28 PM
Isn't it obvious?

The film makers are trying to tell a story.

Imagine sitting around a camp fire listening to an intense story being told by someone who is great at telling stories, only to have someone yell out little bits and pieces of information to do with the settings/plot; that you're not meant to know about yet.

That's annoying in my books.

The film contains the story. The other stuff is just electronic hype injection.
This. We should start spoiler tagging trailers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 28, 2014, 12:04:05 PM
Just spoiler tag the entire internets. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 28, 2014, 12:04:42 PM
Or just avoid the thread.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 28, 2014, 12:06:56 PM
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
All of y'all are crazy.
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 28, 2014, 12:10:22 PM
Hey, hey. I'm taking your advice on going into a movie blind.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 28, 2014, 12:14:12 PM
Sorry wasn't aimed at you oh wise Doom.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 28, 2014, 12:16:44 PM
*in Dogbert's voice*

No offence taken.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 28, 2014, 11:15:06 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbitcast-a-sm.bitgravity.com%2Fslashfilm%2Fwp%2Fwp-content%2Fimages%2FZZ7FAEB9CE.jpg&hash=72d22c60f8044cbd0ea3a688e1ef2997d41fb415)

http://www.slashfilm.com/jurassic-world-plot-details-colin-treverrow/ (http://www.slashfilm.com/jurassic-world-plot-details-colin-treverrow/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on May 28, 2014, 11:19:12 PM
Quote from: ace3g on May 28, 2014, 11:15:06 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbitcast-a-sm.bitgravity.com%2Fslashfilm%2Fwp%2Fwp-content%2Fimages%2FZZ7FAEB9CE.jpg&hash=72d22c60f8044cbd0ea3a688e1ef2997d41fb415)

http://www.slashfilm.com/jurassic-world-plot-details-colin-treverrow/ (http://www.slashfilm.com/jurassic-world-plot-details-colin-treverrow/)

Reminds me of Sarah trying to take a photo of the Stegosaurus from TLW. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 28, 2014, 11:23:38 PM
Loved that interview.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on May 28, 2014, 11:28:59 PM
He's certainly reassured me a little.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 28, 2014, 11:37:41 PM
Solid. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: coolbreeze on May 28, 2014, 11:41:10 PM
Glad to hear about the Raptors. Was worried about them being "pets"   :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on May 28, 2014, 11:56:28 PM
I still feel iffy about the modified genetics.

But the bit on Pratts character made me happy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 29, 2014, 12:22:23 AM
Quote from: MudButt on May 28, 2014, 11:56:28 PM
I still feel iffy about the modified genetics.

Since they're going that route, I'm hoping we get a scene like the room full of failed Ripley clones from Alien Res.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Invader on May 29, 2014, 12:22:54 AM
Quote from: ace3g on May 28, 2014, 11:15:06 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbitcast-a-sm.bitgravity.com%2Fslashfilm%2Fwp%2Fwp-content%2Fimages%2FZZ7FAEB9CE.jpg&hash=72d22c60f8044cbd0ea3a688e1ef2997d41fb415)

http://www.slashfilm.com/jurassic-world-plot-details-colin-treverrow/ (http://www.slashfilm.com/jurassic-world-plot-details-colin-treverrow/)

Is that Spielberg spying on the JW set? :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on May 29, 2014, 02:01:56 AM
Great interview, liking a lot of the stuff they have in mind for the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 29, 2014, 02:50:55 AM
That bit about people always saying how reboots and reimaginations "ruin their childhoods" is true. This isn't our childhood anymore. There's a completely new generation with a whole different way of thinkin. Shorter attention spans too.

With that in mind, I will keep my expectations in check. I still haven't read the leaked plot details and I skipped those parts in the interview. Lets see how the fifirst teaser looks like  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on May 29, 2014, 07:03:41 AM
Quote from: BANE on May 28, 2014, 11:28:59 PM
He's certainly reassured me a little.

Yup. He sounds like a truly honest and chill guy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on May 29, 2014, 01:06:02 PM
QuoteBut with all this talk of filmmakers "ruining our childhood", we forget that right now is someone else's childhood. This is their time. And I have to build something that can take them to the same place those earlier films took us.

Probably the best sentence I've heard from a director in a long time. He seems like the perfect fit for JW.

Unfortunately I read about Dinosaurs
Spoiler
being trained by Chris Pratt
[close]
.

So I'm sitting this one probably out, since I don't like what I'm reading, unless a great trailer and some good reviews convince me otherwise. Cool if he sees it as a vision for a new generation of kids though.



Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 29, 2014, 01:15:39 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on May 29, 2014, 02:50:55 AM
That bit about people always saying how reboots and reimaginations "ruin their childhoods" is true. This isn't our childhood anymore. There's a completely new generation with a whole different way of thinkin. Shorter attention spans too.

With that in mind, I will keep my expectations in check. I still haven't read the leaked plot details and I skipped those parts in the interview. Lets see how the fifirst teaser looks like  :)

If our childhood is that important to us, all we have to is revisit our favourite films and whatnot. That's why people complaining about Transformers (as an example) "ruining their childhood" are silly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 29, 2014, 01:51:09 PM
Quote from: Tangakkai on May 29, 2014, 01:06:02 PM
Unfortunately I read about Dinosaurs
Spoiler
being trained by Chris Pratt
[close]
.

...that's not what the director said, though. He said the dinosaurs arent trained. ._. They wont be rolling around, doing tricks with their tongues out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on May 29, 2014, 02:21:03 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on May 29, 2014, 01:51:09 PM
Quote from: Tangakkai on May 29, 2014, 01:06:02 PM
Unfortunately I read about Dinosaurs
Spoiler
being trained by Chris Pratt
[close]
.

...that's not what the director said, though. He said the dinosaurs arent trained. ._. They wont be rolling around, doing tricks with their tongues out.

he did however say that people in the park will get
Spoiler
closer to the dinosaurs than ever before. That sounds quite foreboding. Even if they just stick to the "good" dino vs. "bad" dino thing, I simply can't handle that kind of stuff. At some point my goodwill is used up.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on May 29, 2014, 02:24:29 PM
Wait and see. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on May 29, 2014, 06:05:59 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on May 29, 2014, 12:22:23 AMSince they're going that route, I'm hoping we get a scene like the room full of failed Ripley clones from Alien Res.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg2.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20121210204740%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2F0%2F02%2FDino_foetus.png&hash=400b75a84591eecba7289fe0bfbfb71f4b777e8c)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 29, 2014, 06:07:43 PM
Quote from: Gilfryd on May 29, 2014, 06:05:59 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on May 29, 2014, 12:22:23 AMSince they're going that route, I'm hoping we get a scene like the room full of failed Ripley clones from Alien Res.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg2.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20121210204740%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2F0%2F02%2FDino_foetus.png&hash=400b75a84591eecba7289fe0bfbfb71f4b777e8c)

Close enough, I suppose, but imagine how f**ked up it could get seeing what resulted from the holes in the code being filled in wrong.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 30, 2014, 09:02:07 AM
From the co-writer of Jurassic World on twitter.

"@ConnollyDerek: Hey @JurassicPark_4 are you going to share how the movie ends, too, when you find out? For f*'s sake"


:D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on May 30, 2014, 10:40:58 AM
Ugh, that's gotta be so f**king frustrating for him.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on May 30, 2014, 11:57:50 AM
I've said this before but Colin definatley seems to be able to talk the talk. However some of the confirmed informative is worrying me still as I'm sure it is others.

To me it feels a bit "well Dinosaurs aren't enough anymore so we're going to make up new ones". With so many to choose from it just feels too forced. I don't know maybe I'm wrong. I hope so.

I know he commented on this too but the CGI in Jurassic Park was so groudbreaking that I still watch films today and often wonder how since then dinosaurs haven't quite looked as good. I guess King Kong came close but still I think certain scenes in JP just haven't been out done.

The anticipation is already so high. For everyones sake I hope they pull it off.

And for the record I'm already going to be let down if the new dino doesn't look anything like Requiem28s' art. Superb.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 30, 2014, 01:42:12 PM
Quote from: Taxemic on May 30, 2014, 11:57:50 AM
"well Dinosaurs aren't enough anymore so we're going to make up new ones".

That is not the point of JW.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: bobby brown on May 30, 2014, 03:48:24 PM
Quote from: Gilfryd on May 29, 2014, 06:05:59 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on May 29, 2014, 12:22:23 AMSince they're going that route, I'm hoping we get a scene like the room full of failed Ripley clones from Alien Res.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg2.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20121210204740%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2F0%2F02%2FDino_foetus.png&hash=400b75a84591eecba7289fe0bfbfb71f4b777e8c)

loved this scene.
But I hope they dont take it to far.

*Imagines mutant t-rex pleading "killll meeee"*

I was very sceptical against this movie, But I really liked what the director had to say about it. i will give this movie a honest chance.

But I hope they dont forget the dinosaurs are supposed to be animals, not monsters. I Found jurassic park 3 to be very entertaining movie,but it was too exaggerated for my taste.

But that spinosaurus ruled.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 31, 2014, 09:19:41 PM
(https://scontent-b-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/t1.0-9/10152452_750663268311520_6809150286972849261_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 31, 2014, 09:22:31 PM
Quote from: ace3g on May 31, 2014, 09:19:41 PM
(https://scontent-b-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/t1.0-9/10152452_750663268311520_6809150286972849261_n.jpg)

Slendermanosaurus rex
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on May 31, 2014, 10:00:17 PM
Judging from the chatter I've skimmed through, it's probably a good thing that I've been oblivious to Jurassic World news.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on May 31, 2014, 11:42:54 PM
Quote from: ace3g on May 31, 2014, 09:19:41 PM
(https://scontent-b-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/t1.0-9/10152452_750663268311520_6809150286972849261_n.jpg)
The dino cages are in the psych ward.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Jun 01, 2014, 10:50:42 AM
What happened to the goat's leg?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-gIZkWzn7DFU%2FUVyIewssOEI%2FAAAAAAAB4YY%2F7BVAP4qrW-w%2Fs1600%2Fjurassic%2Bblanket.gif&hash=ea252b181a3cae6fc09de7bb7eef8910ce254a30)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 01, 2014, 12:36:55 PM
May the 4th move over its now #JurassicJune

JurassicJune.com
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 02, 2014, 11:40:59 AM
Heh, cute. I'll be sure to use that hashtag when my next JP toy shipment arrives.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: War Wager on Jun 02, 2014, 10:56:30 PM
D-Rex concept? Take as much salt as you want:

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.comicbookmovie.com%2Fimages%2Fusers%2Fuploads%2F64514%2FBpIgdgBCUAEB9UT.jpg&hash=93e3aa32534df11e93db8b32d72e72aee36b7865)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jun 02, 2014, 10:57:58 PM
Fan art. ^ Saw the post by the original artist a few days ago. Looks good. Not as good as Requiem's though.  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: War Wager on Jun 02, 2014, 10:58:56 PM
Aw well. Do agree on both counts though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 04, 2014, 02:20:37 PM
For this Jurassic June I'm making a series of videos called 'The History Of Dinosaur Movies'

Check out it JP fans...

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLM1CUnmT_bTNv_0KMxdRP784n3lvhjaDz (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLM1CUnmT_bTNv_0KMxdRP784n3lvhjaDz)

Part 5 will be online tomorrow.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jun 04, 2014, 02:38:00 PM
Really wish that I hadn't seen the spoilers for that stuff...

The thing I care most about is that T.Rex will be featured prominently again.  8) Maybe not as much as D.Rex, but still.

T.Rex is my fav.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 04, 2014, 03:07:06 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 04, 2014, 02:20:37 PM
For this Jurassic June I'm making a series of videos called 'The History Of Dinosaur Movies'

Check out it JP fans...

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLM1CUnmT_bTNv_0KMxdRP784n3lvhjaDz (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLM1CUnmT_bTNv_0KMxdRP784n3lvhjaDz)

Part 5 will be online tomorrow.

Looks good so far, but you forgot to mention The Ghost of Slumber Mountain which is recognized as the big screen's first rendition of prehistoric life.

Quote from: War Wager on Jun 02, 2014, 10:56:30 PM
D-Rex concept? Take as much salt as you want:

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.comicbookmovie.com%2Fimages%2Fusers%2Fuploads%2F64514%2FBpIgdgBCUAEB9UT.jpg&hash=93e3aa32534df11e93db8b32d72e72aee36b7865)
[close]

That looks exactly like an Allosaurus. Suddenly I want to know more about this D.Rex, but I don't at the same time :-[
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 04, 2014, 03:09:43 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 04, 2014, 03:07:06 PM
you forgot to mention The Ghost of Slumber Mountain

Its in the King Kong episode ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 04, 2014, 03:19:25 PM
Ah. I'll give it a watch tomorrow while I'm at work then.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 06, 2014, 12:54:00 PM
Redecorated last night after two very nice additions arrived last night...pics of them will soon come!

http://instagram.com/p/o4zAcaFEgB/ (http://instagram.com/p/o4zAcaFEgB/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 06, 2014, 05:56:20 PM
Effing sweet man! There's just something so satisfying about those red, black and yellow JP boxes.

Although that poster needs a frame! ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 07, 2014, 10:22:52 PM
It's a banner, dude. No need for a frame. Also, some pics of the two latest arrivals that came that night!

http://instagram.com/p/o9JfFmFEve/ (http://instagram.com/p/o9JfFmFEve/)
http://instagram.com/p/o9KABnFEgf/ (http://instagram.com/p/o9KABnFEgf/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 09, 2014, 11:29:07 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWsbcBvYqN8#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWsbcBvYqN8#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 10, 2014, 02:06:01 AM
Alien3, check this out 8)

http://instagram.com/p/pCoERnlEuU/ (http://instagram.com/p/pCoERnlEuU/)

Quote from: ace3g on Jun 09, 2014, 11:29:07 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWsbcBvYqN8#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWsbcBvYqN8#ws)

Practical, practical, practical. The fact that I can't tell the difference all that well between the practical and CGI is a testament to how incredible this film looks.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Jun 12, 2014, 03:37:55 PM
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/KingPatel/news/?a=101760 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/KingPatel/news/?a=101760)

some new stills for ya'll.

chris pratt lookin sexy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Jun 12, 2014, 08:00:17 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Jun 09, 2014, 11:29:07 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWsbcBvYqN8#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWsbcBvYqN8#ws)
"Phil Tippet in a moment realized what he was doing was obsolete."

Ha, what a jackass statement. Didn't this blow up in their faces? Typical of narrow-minded, profit focused producers.

We need the advances in practical effects more desperately now than we ever have, with the overblown, ass festival of fake looking repetitive unbelievable CGI that is most certainly inferior to what JP accomplished more than 20 years ago.

How we literally move backwards in two decades of advancing computer power is the biggest riddle of all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jun 12, 2014, 08:07:38 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FpxyWLaI.jpg&hash=4f5c6ec9c155372654161a8be1ec2b71fc5eb087)
Obligatory Child Leads filled, I see.
I wonder, what will they do to top hacking, gymnastics, and T-Rex pee?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 12, 2014, 08:17:15 PM
Nah, Simpkins will just astral travel and get Tony Stark to help him. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jun 12, 2014, 08:38:43 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jun 12, 2014, 08:07:38 PM
I wonder, what will they do to top hackingknowing how to use a pc, gymnastics, and T-Rex pee?

most likely there'll be a "selfie" in the film somewhere... with a T-Rex behind in an enclosure.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Jun 12, 2014, 09:03:01 PM
heh well children would in a theme park
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 12, 2014, 09:10:57 PM
I simply can not be excited for the film anymore.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Jun 12, 2014, 09:15:15 PM
^^ ha wait till you see the dinosaurs
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 12, 2014, 09:28:17 PM
Quote from: frenchfries on Jun 12, 2014, 09:15:15 PM
^^ ha wait till you see the dinosaurs
You mean the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles in this movie?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Jun 12, 2014, 09:44:15 PM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 12, 2014, 09:28:17 PM
Quote from: frenchfries on Jun 12, 2014, 09:15:15 PM
^^ ha wait till you see the dinosaurs
You mean the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles in this movie?
huh? was that a jab at the movie? or are you on the wrong thread
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 12, 2014, 09:54:36 PM
I can very clearly read the title of this thread. It says, "Jurassic Resurrection."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 12, 2014, 09:56:22 PM
Sounds like someone won't go see it at the cinema then.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 12, 2014, 09:58:04 PM
God damn it you know I will anyway ;~;
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 12, 2014, 10:00:48 PM
Oh, please don't if you're going with a negative attitude.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Jun 12, 2014, 10:03:11 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jun 12, 2014, 08:07:38 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FpxyWLaI.jpg&hash=4f5c6ec9c155372654161a8be1ec2b71fc5eb087)
Oh God alive I don't like this at all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jun 12, 2014, 10:05:36 PM
lol this is going to suck so, so, much.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 12, 2014, 10:07:03 PM
 8)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net%2Fhphotos-ak-xfp1%2Ft31.0-8%2F1501588_744911285553757_5941714108683632789_o.jpg&hash=707a3b9cf97c8de8ad684ec65b9121f7df7b00c3)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jun 12, 2014, 10:14:04 PM
instead of a movie, couldn't they just set up a virtual online tour of this facility. maybe charge a few bucks to get in, pay extra for computer dinosaur food to feed the beasties.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Jun 12, 2014, 10:15:50 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 12, 2014, 10:07:03 PM
8)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net%2Fhphotos-ak-xfp1%2Ft31.0-8%2F1501588_744911285553757_5941714108683632789_o.jpg&hash=707a3b9cf97c8de8ad684ec65b9121f7df7b00c3)

;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 12, 2014, 10:29:24 PM
Quote from: Aspie on Jun 12, 2014, 10:14:04 PM
instead of a movie, couldn't they just set up a virtual online tour of this facility. maybe charge a few bucks to get in, pay extra for computer dinosaur food to feed the beasties.

In all seriousness, I wish someone would take another crack at Operation Genesis. Get a palaeontologist to advise on the AI, add in a first-person tourist mode, modernise/polish, and that design could be pretty much perfect.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 13, 2014, 04:13:56 AM
Play Jurassic Park Builder. It's way better than Operation Genesis. At least I think so.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 13, 2014, 04:43:53 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 13, 2014, 04:13:56 AM
Play Jurassic Park Builder. It's way better than Operation Genesis. At least I think so.
lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RagingDragon on Jun 13, 2014, 06:45:06 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jun 12, 2014, 08:07:38 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FpxyWLaI.jpg&hash=4f5c6ec9c155372654161a8be1ec2b71fc5eb087)
Obligatory Child Leads filled, I see.
I wonder, what will they do to top hacking, gymnastics, and T-Rex pee?
When did they cast the Bieber?! He'll do a dance number in front of the raptor and confuse it into an awkward mating ritual, then he'll run it over with a Ferrari!

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on Jun 13, 2014, 06:46:52 AM
the one kid is the insidious kid, so he'll probably possess a rex or something
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 13, 2014, 06:48:14 AM
Quote from: Kimarhi on Jun 13, 2014, 06:46:52 AM
the one kid is the insidious kid, so he'll probably possess a rex or something

He could also call Iron Man to help. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 13, 2014, 01:56:29 PM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 13, 2014, 04:43:53 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 13, 2014, 04:13:56 AM
Play Jurassic Park Builder. It's way better than Operation Genesis. At least I think so.
lol

What?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Jun 13, 2014, 03:24:48 PM
I hope both those kids get eaten.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jun 13, 2014, 03:25:50 PM
They won't.

They'll probably save the day.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Jun 13, 2014, 05:53:43 PM
Seeing as how Pratt has a motorcycle. I expect sweet chase scenes 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Jun 13, 2014, 06:33:37 PM
Quote from: frenchfries on Jun 13, 2014, 05:53:43 PM
Seeing as how Pratt has a motorcycle. I expect sweet chase scenes 8)

Raptor chase. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 13, 2014, 06:46:41 PM
Welp, I guess that's one Lost World sequence that'll get adapted. You'll want to avert your gaze for that one, Cvalda.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Jun 13, 2014, 06:47:32 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jun 13, 2014, 03:25:50 PM
They won't.

They'll probably save the day.
Oh God I hope not I hope they get squished by a T-rex paw and then consumed by scavengers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jun 13, 2014, 06:50:02 PM
You would direct the world's best childrens films, Bane.

I know you have it in you. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jun 13, 2014, 07:46:22 PM
I bet, like, one of the kids was like a BMX champion or something, and he randomly blurts it out at some point midway through the movie, and then later uses Pratt's bike to take out a raptor or something just in time.

You know it sounds like something a Jurassic Park sequel would do.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 13, 2014, 07:48:55 PM
Yeah! Damn kids, they shouldn't do things. They should just sit by computers and make it a point not help the adults grab a gun when raptor attacks are imminent.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 13, 2014, 07:56:32 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jun 13, 2014, 07:46:22 PM
I bet, like, one of the kids was like a BMX champion or something, and he randomly blurts it out at some point midway through the movie, and then later uses Pratt's bike to take out a raptor or something just in time.

You know it sounds like something a Jurassic Park sequel would do.

You can't do BMX shit on a motorcycle. :P

Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 13, 2014, 07:48:55 PM
Yeah! Damn kids, they shouldn't do things. They should just sit by computers and make it a point not help the adults grab a gun when raptor attacks are imminent.

:laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jun 13, 2014, 07:59:25 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 13, 2014, 07:56:32 PM
You can't do BMX shit on a motorcycle. :P
God, it would just be a movie, why do you have to overanalyze things? ::) ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 13, 2014, 08:52:46 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jun 13, 2014, 06:46:41 PM
Welp, I guess that's one Lost World sequence that'll get adapted. You'll want to avert your gaze for that one, Cvalda.

Oh gawd yes
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Jun 13, 2014, 08:54:41 PM
Yeah that was actually a good sequence.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Jun 14, 2014, 08:04:29 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jun 12, 2014, 08:07:38 PMObligatory Child Leads filled, I see. I wonder, what will they do to top hacking, gymnastics, and T-Rex pee?

You act like there's something odd about kids in a family oriented action/adventure series featuring dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on Jun 15, 2014, 09:25:45 AM
Not odd, repetetive.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Jun 15, 2014, 10:06:27 AM
the kids will become dinosaur whisperers, and unleash the good pet dinosaurs upon the bad ones.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 15, 2014, 10:14:25 AM
I like how it's two siblings, an older one looking after the younger one. I'm not sure why, but I like the idea of that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bender1988 on Jun 15, 2014, 11:44:00 AM
Quote from: RagingDragon on Jun 13, 2014, 06:45:06 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jun 12, 2014, 08:07:38 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FpxyWLaI.jpg&hash=4f5c6ec9c155372654161a8be1ec2b71fc5eb087)
Obligatory Child Leads filled, I see.
I wonder, what will they do to top hacking, gymnastics, and T-Rex pee?
When did they cast the Bieber?! He'll do a dance number in front of the raptor and confuse it into an awkward mating ritual, then he'll run it over with a Ferrari!
This is quite possible outcome ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Jun 15, 2014, 02:49:09 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 15, 2014, 10:14:25 AM
I like how it's two siblings, an older one looking after the younger one. I'm not sure why, but I like the idea of that.
It's certainly something new and exciting.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 15, 2014, 05:34:17 PM
Quote from: BANE on Jun 13, 2014, 03:24:48 PM
I hope both those kids get eaten.

I don't think Hollywood's reached that point yet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Jun 15, 2014, 06:26:23 PM
Certainly more realistic if they did.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 15, 2014, 06:30:06 PM
Because genetically engineered dinosaurs are realistic. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Jun 15, 2014, 06:36:03 PM
Ok come on enough with that lame argument again and again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 15, 2014, 08:24:14 PM
Quote from: BANE on Jun 15, 2014, 06:36:03 PM
Ok come on enough with that lame argument again and again.
Quote from: Dr. GrantDinosaurs lived sixty five million years ago. What is left of them is fossilised in the rocks, and it is in the rock that real scientists make real discoveries! What John Hammond and InGen did at Jurassic Park is create genetically engineered theme park monsters! Nothing more and nothing less.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Jun 15, 2014, 08:48:02 PM
ALAN
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 15, 2014, 08:50:11 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Jun 15, 2014, 08:48:02 PM
ALAN

ALAN
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jun 15, 2014, 08:54:26 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.tumblr.com%2F5d369b6b92b02a634c848b36eae2e46c%2Ftumblr_inline_n363fniTAL1sr3o7r.gif&hash=fc97b6be60a2c6a27e0695e7cda37f3e88b48739)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Jun 15, 2014, 11:16:36 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 15, 2014, 05:34:17 PM
Quote from: BANE on Jun 13, 2014, 03:24:48 PM
I hope both those kids get eaten.

I don't think Hollywood's reached that point yet.

We need the Strouse brothers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Jun 15, 2014, 11:38:33 PM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 15, 2014, 08:24:14 PM
Quote from: BANE on Jun 15, 2014, 06:36:03 PM
Ok come on enough with that lame argument again and again.
Quote from: Dr. GrantDinosaurs lived sixty five million years ago. What is left of them is fossilised in the rocks, and it is in the rock that real scientists make real discoveries! What John Hammond and InGen did at Jurassic Park is create genetically engineered theme park monsters! Nothing more and nothing less.
Said the man desperately looking for funds for his perched-on-the-edge-of-obsolete research.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 16, 2014, 11:18:15 AM
He wasn't wrong and considering the islands were off bounds to any outsiders, his research needed serious funding.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Jun 16, 2014, 12:22:08 PM
Still doesn't make the argument in question any less pointless.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 16, 2014, 12:41:48 PM
Then why bother mentioning that Grant was the one who called it?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Spidey3121 on Jun 16, 2014, 05:56:24 PM
Quote from: bloodinthemud on Jun 15, 2014, 11:16:36 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 15, 2014, 05:34:17 PM
Quote from: BANE on Jun 13, 2014, 03:24:48 PM
I hope both those kids get eaten.

I don't think Hollywood's reached that point yet.

We need the Strouse brothers.

Yeah, they'll take care of that in no time
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 17, 2014, 12:23:05 AM
Hey guys I've been gone a while,

Just popping in quickly to let you know our latest episode of the Jurassic Cast podcast has just been released with special guest Martin Ferrero!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-KAV5LoNuF6Y%2FUhpQ0htPybI%2FAAAAAAAAU0U%2FDIOdgH2mvSU%2Fs1600%2Fl.jpg&hash=1571a98767916b1d8ceaa9c1e616714e06dd74b3)

All information and links here: Jpforever.com

Let me know what you guys think! ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Jun 17, 2014, 04:20:42 AM
Quote from: bloodinthemud on Jun 15, 2014, 11:16:36 PMWe need the Strouse brothers.

Or del Toro.

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-zT60OVpDsng%2FTq1_fDXnIoI%2FAAAAAAAAADk%2F4iUXhJT2KWU%2Fs1600%2FMimicEatDog.png&hash=e0fe0a4ef2be4af3667f281ce0de3ad27f4caa46)

Dead kids and puppies!
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gazz on Jun 17, 2014, 09:32:52 AM
Pic from the Licensing Expo:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.comingsoon.net%2Fgallery%2F119560%2FLicensing_Expo_2014_11.jpg&hash=bd54e88bba8a450e2ecc7cf40cdf5db5e6226cf3)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Jun 17, 2014, 06:50:14 PM
Quote from: Gazz on Jun 17, 2014, 09:32:52 AM
Pic from the Licensing Expo:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.comingsoon.net%2Fgallery%2F119560%2FLicensing_Expo_2014_11.jpg&hash=bd54e88bba8a450e2ecc7cf40cdf5db5e6226cf3)


can't really see the pic there
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 17, 2014, 10:53:58 PM
Quote from: Gazz on Jun 17, 2014, 09:32:52 AM
Pic from the Licensing Expo:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.comingsoon.net%2Fgallery%2F119560%2FLicensing_Expo_2014_11.jpg&hash=bd54e88bba8a450e2ecc7cf40cdf5db5e6226cf3)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.aullidos.com%2Fimagenes%2Fvarios%2Fhr_Licensing_Expo_2014_11.jpg&hash=97193885750649bfbdee5707e334a81350bab688)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jun 18, 2014, 12:53:41 AM
Via Trevorrow's twitter:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fimages%2Fnews%2Fanimatronic.jpg&hash=f8f2c0c6a68adfae1298d00d92ecafa789a62c8c)

Shadow of the new dinosaur?.. That's a lot of teeth.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 18, 2014, 12:57:42 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Jun 18, 2014, 12:53:41 AM
Via Trevorrow's twitter:

http://www.jplegacy.org/images/news/animatronic.jpg

Shadow of the new dinosaur?.. That's a lot of teeth.

I like it. The silhouette is quite nice looking.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jun 18, 2014, 01:00:58 AM
Pics of t-shirts and info posters from the Jurassic World park.

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.comingsoon.net%2Fgallery%2F119560%2Fhr_Licensing_Expo_2014_67.jpg&hash=d0687f096a5ee8d1b23896d28b570354c41fb229)

Mr. DNA is back.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 18, 2014, 01:06:24 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Jun 18, 2014, 01:00:58 AM
Pics of t-shirts and info posters from the Jurassic World park.

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.comingsoon.net%2Fgallery%2F119560%2Fhr_Licensing_Expo_2014_67.jpg&hash=d0687f096a5ee8d1b23896d28b570354c41fb229)

Mr. DNA is back.
[close]

Pic's not showing up, but I copied the url.

Spoiler
I spy a mosasaur on the lower right. 8)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Jun 18, 2014, 02:48:48 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Jun 18, 2014, 12:53:41 AM
Via Trevorrow's twitter:

http://www.jplegacy.org/images/news/animatronic.jpg

Shadow of the new dinosaur?.. That's a lot of teeth.

Spoiler
Might be the Mosasaur. Has that really crocodilian look to it. :P
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 18, 2014, 02:57:45 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Jun 18, 2014, 12:53:41 AM
Via Trevorrow's twitter:

http://www.jplegacy.org/images/news/animatronic.jpg

Shadow of the new dinosaur?.. That's a lot of teeth.

I wonder if it's upsidedown. If not then it resembles G98 with that thick lower jaw/chin.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Jun 18, 2014, 04:01:10 AM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Jun 18, 2014, 02:48:48 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Jun 18, 2014, 12:53:41 AM
Via Trevorrow's twitter:

http://www.jplegacy.org/images/news/animatronic.jpg

Shadow of the new dinosaur?.. That's a lot of teeth.

Spoiler
Might be the Mosasaur. Has that really crocodilian look to it. :P
[close]
After seeing the other expo pics,i definitely agree^
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 18, 2014, 04:41:29 AM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 18, 2014, 02:57:45 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Jun 18, 2014, 12:53:41 AM
Via Trevorrow's twitter:

http://www.jplegacy.org/images/news/animatronic.jpg

Shadow of the new dinosaur?.. That's a lot of teeth.

I wonder if it's upsidedown. If not then it resembles G98 with that thick lower jaw/chin.
It obviously is -- that's a typical lower jaw shape.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 23, 2014, 06:07:24 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEUyw82obJU#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEUyw82obJU#ws)

"George of the Jungle" XD
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jun 24, 2014, 06:34:41 PM
http://www.today.com/entertainment/can-chris-pratts-ripped-abs-save-day-jurassic-world-obviously-1D79842315 (http://www.today.com/entertainment/can-chris-pratts-ripped-abs-save-day-jurassic-world-obviously-1D79842315)

Set visit interview.

Quote"Are those your abs?"
Typical mainstream entertainment interview question.

Quote"Those are America's abs." 
Perfect answer.  ;D

Also:
Spielberg is quite active behind the scenes for this film, creating ideas for sequences etc.
Trevorrow was hand picked by Spielberg to do this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Jun 24, 2014, 07:18:19 PM
Good to know that spielberg is involved to this extent. I'm also digging the look of the sets and costumes!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jun 24, 2014, 07:24:11 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Jun 24, 2014, 06:34:41 PM
Also:
Spielberg is quite active behind the scenes for this film, creating ideas for sequences etc.
Translation: they're again shooting without a fixed script.

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibiblio.org%2Fsamneill%2Fpictures%2Fjp3%2Fjp3logo.jpg&hash=53a037854dbbba93ea0108741f246b58b655a180)
;D
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jun 24, 2014, 07:33:24 PM
They delayed the film for over a year to finish the script. ;_; The previous release date was this summer.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 24, 2014, 08:37:30 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Jun 24, 2014, 06:34:41 PM
http://www.today.com/entertainment/can-chris-pratts-ripped-abs-save-day-jurassic-world-obviously-1D79842315 (http://www.today.com/entertainment/can-chris-pratts-ripped-abs-save-day-jurassic-world-obviously-1D79842315)

Set visit interview.

Quote"Are those your abs?"
Typical mainstream entertainment interview question.

Quote"Those are America's abs." 
Perfect answer.  ;D

Also:
Spielberg is quite active behind the scenes for this film, creating ideas for sequences etc.
Trevorrow was hand picked by Spielberg to do this.

America's abs  :laugh: :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: p1nk81cd on Jun 24, 2014, 10:53:55 PM
Anyone else hoping to see Mapusaurus and Carnotaurus?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 25, 2014, 02:37:06 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Jun 24, 2014, 07:33:24 PM
They delayed the film for over a year to finish the script. ;_; The previous release date was this summer.
Because they cant do much more with the concept without radically changing the scope of the film. I mean we do have it called 'Jurassic World' now....

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 25, 2014, 03:03:44 AM
Quote from: Mr. Runner on Jun 24, 2014, 10:53:55 PM
Anyone else hoping to see Mapusaurus and Carnotaurus?

As a dino groupie, yes, especially Mapusaurus but it's not well-known amongst the general public and it doesn't really have any interesting features to distinguish from being a "T.Rex-lookalike". At least Carnotaurus has the unique skull, along with having a small fan base behind it thanks to TLW novel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Spidey3121 on Jun 25, 2014, 05:49:36 PM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 25, 2014, 02:37:06 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Jun 24, 2014, 07:33:24 PM
They delayed the film for over a year to finish the script. ;_; The previous release date was this summer.
Because they cant do much more with the concept without radically changing the scope of the film. I mean we do have it called 'Jurassic World' now....

Right, the general plotline is pretty-well set in stone. Humans play god w/ dinosaurs, get eaten. It's a tough balancing act. It needs to do enough to distinguish itself while also delivering on what they know audiences enjoyed from the previous 3 installments. It's the same issue that the newly announced Predator reboot will face.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Jun 25, 2014, 05:53:47 PM
What I find hilarious is that they've built a new park on the ruins of the old one despite the islands being restricted and everyone getting killed, and all the new employees they've convinced to work there yet again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 25, 2014, 06:14:27 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Jun 25, 2014, 05:53:47 PM
What I find hilarious is that they've built a new park on the ruins of the old one despite the islands being restricted and everyone getting killed, and all the new employees they've convinced to work there yet again.

They spared no expense.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 25, 2014, 06:41:59 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Jun 25, 2014, 05:53:47 PM
What I find hilarious is that they've built a new park on the ruins of the old one despite the islands being restricted and everyone getting killed, and all the new employees they've convinced to work there yet again.

I'm sure this will be addressed in the film. Hell, it's a brand new company so that's a start.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Jun 25, 2014, 06:48:19 PM
Bad economy, people need work.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 25, 2014, 07:06:10 PM
Dino Supervisor Phil Tippett Teases "Big" JURASSIC WORLD Presence At Comic-Con

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/KingPatel/news/?a=102550#e6l4T0TuH5j8oIyY.99 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/KingPatel/news/?a=102550#e6l4T0TuH5j8oIyY.99)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 25, 2014, 07:15:27 PM
Lower atmospheric oxygen creates dinosaurs, giant space rock destroys dinosaurs, receding forests create man, man destroys forests, InGen creates dinosaurs.
Dinosaurs eat/bankrupt InGen, Patel inherits the Nublar.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Jun 25, 2014, 07:17:19 PM
 :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 26, 2014, 01:27:36 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jun 25, 2014, 07:15:27 PM
Lower atmospheric oxygen creates dinosaurs, giant space rock destroys dinosaurs, receding forests create man, man destroys forests, InGen creates dinosaurs.
Dinosaurs eat/bankrupt InGen, Patel inherits the Nublar.

Only you could say this *fist bump*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 26, 2014, 07:15:51 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 25, 2014, 06:41:59 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Jun 25, 2014, 05:53:47 PM
What I find hilarious is that they've built a new park on the ruins of the old one despite the islands being restricted and everyone getting killed, and all the new employees they've convinced to work there yet again.

I'm sure this will be addressed in the film. Hell, it's a brand new company so that's a start.
Until somebody shows me all the bodies buried under the Batcave, it doesn't need to be addressed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Jun 26, 2014, 10:27:53 AM
First look at JURASSIC WORLD Hasbro Product!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FTAAWgad.png&hash=683da1320135dff6d4037b3cba529f75e6e1d37a)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 26, 2014, 11:43:23 AM
Raptor Claw, eh? Interesting. The Allosaurus that Chris is playing with though has been out for a year.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: p1nk81cd on Jun 26, 2014, 02:02:20 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 25, 2014, 03:03:44 AM
Quote from: Mr. Runner on Jun 24, 2014, 10:53:55 PM
Anyone else hoping to see Mapusaurus and Carnotaurus?

As a dino groupie, yes, especially Mapusaurus but it's not well-known amongst the general public and it doesn't really have any interesting features to distinguish from being a "T.Rex-lookalike". At least Carnotaurus has the unique skull, along with having a small fan base behind it thanks to TLW novel.

The fan base really is small for Carnotaurus? Damn, it's one of the most unique theropods out there. I loved them in TLW novel, even though they are given very little 'screen time?'.

As for Mapusaurus, I hold out for her. You never know, huh?  :)


And also... Emmet Brickowski is going to be one of the main characters of the film!? AWESOME!!!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F0-media-cdn.foolz.us%2Fffuuka%2Fboard%2Fa%2Fimage%2F1393%2F75%2F1393753144315.gif&hash=4f2c018d551c736848002debe8430734eb7b51ef)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 26, 2014, 02:19:04 PM
Quote from: Mr. Runner on Jun 26, 2014, 02:02:20 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 25, 2014, 03:03:44 AM
Quote from: Mr. Runner on Jun 24, 2014, 10:53:55 PM
Anyone else hoping to see Mapusaurus and Carnotaurus?

As a dino groupie, yes, especially Mapusaurus but it's not well-known amongst the general public and it doesn't really have any interesting features to distinguish from being a "T.Rex-lookalike". At least Carnotaurus has the unique skull, along with having a small fan base behind it thanks to TLW novel.

The fan base really is small for Carnotaurus? Damn, it's one of the most unique theropods out there. I loved them in TLW novel, even though they are given very little 'screen time?'.

As for Mapusaurus, I hold out for her. You never know, huh?  :)

Carnotaurus isn't as well-known amongst the general public as T.Rex or even Allosaurus but being featured in Disney's Dinosaur in 2000 definitely helped.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 26, 2014, 07:10:33 PM
Just stopping by to say: Yes
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Jun 26, 2014, 11:51:12 PM
could that be the D-Rex on the box art?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: coolbreeze on Jun 27, 2014, 12:38:59 AM
Quote from: frenchfries on Jun 26, 2014, 11:51:12 PM
could that be the D-Rex on the box art?

It looks colourful enough.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 27, 2014, 01:00:59 AM
Quote from: frenchfries on Jun 26, 2014, 11:51:12 PM
could that be the D-Rex on the box art?

What's a D-Rex? Is this a spoiler? Because I've been avoiding those.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 27, 2014, 01:14:24 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 27, 2014, 01:00:59 AM
Quote from: frenchfries on Jun 26, 2014, 11:51:12 PM
could that be the D-Rex on the box art?

What's a D-Rex? Is this a spoiler? Because I've been avoiding those.

A real spoiler or an Alien³ blargle wargle spoiler?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 27, 2014, 01:17:50 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 27, 2014, 01:14:24 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 27, 2014, 01:00:59 AM
Quote from: frenchfries on Jun 26, 2014, 11:51:12 PM
could that be the D-Rex on the box art?

What's a D-Rex? Is this a spoiler? Because I've been avoiding those.

A real spoiler or an Alien³ blargle wargle spoiler?

I'm asking you folks :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 27, 2014, 01:27:23 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 27, 2014, 01:17:50 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 27, 2014, 01:14:24 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 27, 2014, 01:00:59 AM
Quote from: frenchfries on Jun 26, 2014, 11:51:12 PM
could that be the D-Rex on the box art?

What's a D-Rex? Is this a spoiler? Because I've been avoiding those.

A real spoiler or an Alien³ blargle wargle spoiler?

I'm asking you folks :P

I don't know of any major plot spoilers, but just to be cautious,

Spoiler
It's the new dino specifically engineered to be a theme park attraction, and is rumored to have the chameleon abilities of the Carnotauruses from the books.
[close]

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jun 27, 2014, 01:43:30 AM
That's gonna be something that they'll show in the very first trailer. It's the basic premise of the film. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 27, 2014, 11:34:38 AM
Not clicking on spoiler, not clicking on spoiler, not clicking on spoiler...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Jun 27, 2014, 11:53:40 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fe0jIJZah.jpg&hash=550347e99af6ad128cccc8d45bc152a196d198a9)

New JP toys coming to toysrus 11th of November apparently. Leaked from system on toysrus computers.Possibly building up hype to JW that's why they are under the JP brand.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 27, 2014, 05:49:46 PM
Nice names...kind of. Growler and Basher Biter sound like they could be repaints.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jun 27, 2014, 06:24:49 PM
They'll never bring back the big red Kenner Rex...  :( :( :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 27, 2014, 06:50:14 PM
Gah, I sooooooooo want Hasbro to pull a Vintage re-release with JP like they did with Star Wars! Maybe if we all tweeted en masse to them?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: coolbreeze on Jun 27, 2014, 08:16:52 PM
I have a box of the original JP toys somewhere around my place.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 27, 2014, 11:36:27 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 27, 2014, 01:14:24 AM
A real spoiler or an Alien³ blargle wargle spoiler?

That night really scarred you didn't it? :-*

Spoiler
I still believe leaked set photos should be in spoiler tags.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jun 29, 2014, 11:16:16 AM
https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/483194151366696960 (https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/483194151366696960)

Not a spoiler, but just in case someone gets butthurt:

Spoiler
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BrSmhQpCUAAs3yL.jpg)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on Jun 29, 2014, 11:21:47 AM
I just wonder why a theme park owner would think it would be necessary to create
Spoiler
an even more dangerous, intelligent and vicious carnivore than a spino or T-Rex... they could hardly cope with those and now they're going to make an even more aggressive individual... yeah great thinking... just sounds dumb  :-X
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jun 29, 2014, 01:55:56 PM
To.....

Spoiler
Bring in bigger crowds to Jurassic World. Because the new park has been running well for years (it's actually safe!) but attendance is starting to drop... so... time for a new attraction.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 29, 2014, 04:25:36 PM
Quote from: coolbreeze on Jun 27, 2014, 08:16:52 PM
I have a box of the original JP toys somewhere around my place.

Unpack those bad boys, bad boy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on Jun 29, 2014, 06:03:20 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Jun 29, 2014, 01:55:56 PM
To.....

Spoiler
Bring in bigger crowds to Jurassic World. Because the new park has been running well for years (it's actually safe!) but attendance is starting to drop... so... time for a new attraction.
[close]

Ok yeah I see what you mean, that is actually a valid point. But you must admit it just sounds like they want something new for a 4th movie. Has it been confirmed that
Spoiler
the park will feature an underwater area with a Mosasaurus?
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jun 29, 2014, 07:21:35 PM
Yup.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 30, 2014, 08:35:01 AM
Jurassic Resurrection...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 30, 2014, 12:52:22 PM
It's the last day of Jurassic June.

My playlist 'The History of Dinosaur Movies' is now complete...

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLM1CUnmT_bTNv_0KMxdRP784n3lvhjaDz (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLM1CUnmT_bTNv_0KMxdRP784n3lvhjaDz)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 01, 2014, 12:17:53 AM
My ending to Jurassic June 8)

http://instagram.com/p/p4s5belEkh/ (http://instagram.com/p/p4s5belEkh/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 01, 2014, 04:37:28 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 01, 2014, 12:17:53 AM
My ending to Jurassic June 8)

http://instagram.com/p/p4s5belEkh/ (http://instagram.com/p/p4s5belEkh/)

Nice!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Jul 01, 2014, 10:19:40 PM
Mute the left video.

http://www.youtubedoubler.com/?video1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DNK62SBsGZH0&start1=0&video2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DPJlmYh27MHg&start2=137&authorName=snoopsagan (http://www.youtubedoubler.com/?video1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DNK62SBsGZH0&start1=0&video2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DPJlmYh27MHg&start2=137&authorName=snoopsagan)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: coolbreeze on Jul 02, 2014, 06:39:49 AM
Quote from: Cal427eb on Jul 01, 2014, 10:19:40 PM
Mute the left video.

http://www.youtubedoubler.com/?video1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DNK62SBsGZH0&start1=0&video2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DPJlmYh27MHg&start2=137&authorName=snoopsagan (http://www.youtubedoubler.com/?video1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DNK62SBsGZH0&start1=0&video2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DPJlmYh27MHg&start2=137&authorName=snoopsagan)

:laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jul 07, 2014, 07:58:53 PM
SPOILERS POSSIBLY FOR JURASSIC WORLD

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fscontent-a.cdninstagram.com%2Fhphotos-xpf1%2Ft51.2885-15%2F10513697_709465559123874_1466314949_n.jpg&hash=2b5d0d1b45d55c82a71171e5d5919c46fa6bfcc2)

Apologies if this has been posted already, but I don't remember seeing it before today.

Also no idea if that's a muzzle or just like something to keep the animatronic from breaking during like shipping or something.

Overall though I like the way that raptor looks. 
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jul 07, 2014, 08:04:08 PM
It's beautiful.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jul 07, 2014, 08:22:52 PM
Quite possibly a
Spoiler
muzzle.
[close]
Cant be too careful around those animals. Lookin gewd! Lookin gewd!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jul 07, 2014, 09:34:10 PM
I guess they didn't change their minds about feathered dromies. Sad.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 07, 2014, 09:36:38 PM
Very nice.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 07, 2014, 09:37:20 PM
Spoiler
I see a Triforce in the background. OMG, totes gonna be Zelda crossover. :laugh:
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 07, 2014, 09:43:09 PM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Jul 07, 2014, 07:58:53 PM
SPOILERS POSSIBLY FOR JURASSIC WORLD

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fscontent-a.cdninstagram.com%2Fhphotos-xpf1%2Ft51.2885-15%2F10513697_709465559123874_1466314949_n.jpg&hash=2b5d0d1b45d55c82a71171e5d5919c46fa6bfcc2)

Apologies if this has been posted already, but I don't remember seeing it before today.

Also no idea if that's a muzzle or just like something to keep the animatronic from breaking during like shipping or something.

Overall though I like the way that raptor looks. 
[close]
I LOVE THIS.

Spoiler
Looks just like a TLW Raptor, only of a green tint.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jul 07, 2014, 09:44:21 PM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Jul 07, 2014, 07:58:53 PM
SPOILERS POSSIBLY FOR JURASSIC WORLD

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fscontent-a.cdninstagram.com%2Fhphotos-xpf1%2Ft51.2885-15%2F10513697_709465559123874_1466314949_n.jpg&hash=2b5d0d1b45d55c82a71171e5d5919c46fa6bfcc2)

Apologies if this has been posted already, but I don't remember seeing it before today.

Also no idea if that's a muzzle or just like something to keep the animatronic from breaking during like shipping or something.

Overall though I like the way that raptor looks. 
[close]

Well, I'm a little more excited now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jul 07, 2014, 10:11:02 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8apI6x2Qyg#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8apI6x2Qyg#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Jul 07, 2014, 10:48:58 PM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Jul 07, 2014, 07:58:53 PM
SPOILERS POSSIBLY FOR JURASSIC WORLD

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fscontent-a.cdninstagram.com%2Fhphotos-xpf1%2Ft51.2885-15%2F10513697_709465559123874_1466314949_n.jpg&hash=2b5d0d1b45d55c82a71171e5d5919c46fa6bfcc2)

Apologies if this has been posted already, but I don't remember seeing it before today.

Also no idea if that's a muzzle or just like something to keep the animatronic from breaking during like shipping or something.

Overall though I like the way that raptor looks. 
[close]

Looks good! :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 07, 2014, 11:15:39 PM
That raptor is too plain. I'm sorry, but there's no excuse, none, for not having feathers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jul 07, 2014, 11:16:51 PM
Aside from the fact that they didn't have them in the first three movies, but whatevs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 07, 2014, 11:20:43 PM
They did in JP3. Also, given how far dinosaur research has come since then, combined with the fact that this is a brand new movie, they should have feathers. From what I understand, Transformers: AoE's brief dinosaur montage has JW beat for accuracy, and that's saying a lot!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 07, 2014, 11:21:28 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 07, 2014, 11:15:39 PM
That raptor is too plain. I'm sorry, but there's no excuse, none, for not having feathers.

Dude, it's logical for the JP universe. :-*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jul 07, 2014, 11:23:57 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 07, 2014, 11:20:43 PM
They did in JP3.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fp2.la-img.com%2F930%2F18669%2F6321823_3_l.jpg&hash=beafdadd4a7dae502f62b2dacffa8d014946c53b)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jul 07, 2014, 11:24:44 PM
Raptors look good in green. Who knew? :P

Now gimme a "blue" raptor  like the one in the Game Gear vidja game and i'll be a happy camper. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 07, 2014, 11:25:35 PM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Jul 07, 2014, 11:23:57 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 07, 2014, 11:20:43 PM
They did in JP3.

http://p2.la-img.com/930/18669/6321823_3_l.jpg

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fanimal.memozee.com%2FArch01%2F1085840393.jpg&hash=d72594ae5b2c6e0bbfb8dd48a37a483c32a27548)

Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 07, 2014, 11:21:28 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 07, 2014, 11:15:39 PM
That raptor is too plain. I'm sorry, but there's no excuse, none, for not having feathers.

Dude, it's logical for the JP universe. :-*

And that means that universe cannot evolve?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jul 07, 2014, 11:29:16 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 07, 2014, 11:25:35 PM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Jul 07, 2014, 11:23:57 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 07, 2014, 11:20:43 PM
They did in JP3.

http://p2.la-img.com/930/18669/6321823_3_l.jpg

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fanimal.memozee.com%2FArch01%2F1085840393.jpg&hash=d72594ae5b2c6e0bbfb8dd48a37a483c32a27548)

Point is there is still at least one without feathers in JP3, not all of them have feathers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jul 07, 2014, 11:29:53 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 07, 2014, 11:25:35 PM
http://p2.la-img.com/930/18669/6321823_3_l.jpg
Well DAMN, look at that six foot turkey and its might...handful...erm, half dozen quills. 2feathery4me
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jul 07, 2014, 11:30:54 PM
I see enough people complaining about just the idea of feathered dinosaurs existing that it would be stupid for them to have feathers in the new JP. Since it takes place in like a restarted JP that actually more or less worked, it makes perfect sense that the raptors don't have feathers still cause people just don't like them having feathers I guess. Why would an amusement park design creatures that the common people don't want to see?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 07, 2014, 11:33:25 PM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Jul 07, 2014, 11:29:16 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 07, 2014, 11:25:35 PM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Jul 07, 2014, 11:23:57 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 07, 2014, 11:20:43 PM
They did in JP3.

http://p2.la-img.com/930/18669/6321823_3_l.jpg

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fanimal.memozee.com%2FArch01%2F1085840393.jpg&hash=d72594ae5b2c6e0bbfb8dd48a37a483c32a27548)

Point is there is still at least one without feathers in JP3, not all of them have feathers.

They used it as a way to differentiate between the males and females in the film. My point is that, and I've always maintained this, if you're going to portray animals that used to actually exist on this planet, then they should be respected as such and be portrayed properly, from a physical standpoint.

Quote from: Cvalda on Jul 07, 2014, 11:29:53 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 07, 2014, 11:25:35 PM
http://p2.la-img.com/930/18669/6321823_3_l.jpg
Well DAMN, look at that six foot turkey and its might...handful...erm, half dozen quills. 2feathery4me

That was Rich's post :P But since you brought it up, have a look at this.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dinosaurfact.net%2FPictures%2FVelociraptor3.jpg&hash=4f1e2906e388726145b320199f5ad8aeee929e74)

Quote from: KNIGHT on Jul 07, 2014, 11:30:54 PM
I see enough people complaining about just the idea of feathered dinosaurs existing that it would be stupid for them to have feathers in the new JP. Since it takes place in like a restarted JP that actually more or less worked, it makes perfect sense that the raptors don't have feathers still cause people just don't like them having feathers I guess. Why would an amusement park design creatures that the common people don't want to see?

The commoners likely have no clue what to expect exactly, so I doubt feathers would make them go see something else.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 07, 2014, 11:35:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 07, 2014, 11:25:35 PM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Jul 07, 2014, 11:23:57 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 07, 2014, 11:20:43 PM
They did in JP3.

http://p2.la-img.com/930/18669/6321823_3_l.jpg

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fanimal.memozee.com%2FArch01%2F1085840393.jpg&hash=d72594ae5b2c6e0bbfb8dd48a37a483c32a27548)

Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 07, 2014, 11:21:28 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 07, 2014, 11:15:39 PM
That raptor is too plain. I'm sorry, but there's no excuse, none, for not having feathers.

Dude, it's logical for the JP universe. :-*

And that means that universe cannot evolve?

Not in 14 years.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 07, 2014, 11:36:59 PM
It did in JP 3, and personally I think it worked to some extent, uber-powerful Spinosaurus aside.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 07, 2014, 11:41:04 PM
It's been long established they're a different species or different cloned version of the same raptors.

So the only way you'll see feathers is if they release a movie where they show InGen's other cloned raptors. In Jurassic Time Hammond explains there are 3 different breeds of raptor on sorner.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jul 07, 2014, 11:42:49 PM
They aren't accurate raptors to begin with, being like double the normal size of a real Velociraptor.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Jul 07, 2014, 11:46:27 PM
I'm sorry Doom but I'm honestly somewhat more frightened of a large lizard than what you're suggesting, which is a large pidgeon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jul 07, 2014, 11:49:16 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 07, 2014, 11:33:25 PM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Jul 07, 2014, 11:29:16 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 07, 2014, 11:25:35 PM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Jul 07, 2014, 11:23:57 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 07, 2014, 11:20:43 PM
They did in JP3.

http://p2.la-img.com/930/18669/6321823_3_l.jpg

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fanimal.memozee.com%2FArch01%2F1085840393.jpg&hash=d72594ae5b2c6e0bbfb8dd48a37a483c32a27548)

Point is there is still at least one without feathers in JP3, not all of them have feathers.

They used it as a way to differentiate between the males and females in the film.

Which is frankly, stupid, if you want to "portray animals that actually existed" because feathered creatures don't differentiate sex through having more or less feathers, but through colour and pattern, assuming the individual species differentiates gender at all. Good thing this is just a movie and not a serious documentary on real pre-historic life.

I'm not buying the "if you're going to portray animals that used to actually exist on this planet" argument either because if that were the case than Velociraptor would be about the size or smaller than a German Shepard in the first place.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 07, 2014, 11:50:44 PM
And I've never seen anyone bitch about the Dilo not being accurate.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ShadowPred on Jul 07, 2014, 11:51:11 PM
Lol, dinos with feathers. GTFO and take your science-ruining shiz outta here!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 07, 2014, 11:54:19 PM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Jul 07, 2014, 11:49:16 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 07, 2014, 11:33:25 PM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Jul 07, 2014, 11:29:16 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 07, 2014, 11:25:35 PM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Jul 07, 2014, 11:23:57 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 07, 2014, 11:20:43 PM
They did in JP3.

http://p2.la-img.com/930/18669/6321823_3_l.jpg

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fanimal.memozee.com%2FArch01%2F1085840393.jpg&hash=d72594ae5b2c6e0bbfb8dd48a37a483c32a27548)

Point is there is still at least one without feathers in JP3, not all of them have feathers.

They used it as a way to differentiate between the males and females in the film.

Which is frankly, stupid, if you want to "portray animals that actually existed" because feathered creatures don't differentiate sex through having more or less feathers, but through colour and pattern, assuming the individual species differentiates gender at all. Good thing this is just a movie and not a serious documentary on real pre-historic life.

I'm not buying the "if you're going to portray animals that used to actually exist on this planet" argument either because if that were the case than Velociraptor would be about the size or smaller than a German Shepard in the first place.

You're right, and it should be that size. Want a big dromaeosaurid? Here's your answer. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utahraptor)

Quote from: KiramidHead on Jul 07, 2014, 11:50:44 PM
And I've never seen anyone bitch about the Dilo not being accurate.

Then you haven't been paying attention.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jul 07, 2014, 11:56:14 PM
Quote from: ShadowPred on Jul 07, 2014, 11:51:11 PM
Lol, dinos with feathers. GTFO and take your science-ruining shiz outta here!

QFT.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jul 08, 2014, 12:01:04 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jul 07, 2014, 11:16:51 PM
Aside from the fact that they didn't have them in the first three movies, but whatevs.

We didn't even know they had feathers at that point. The avian connection had achieved virtually unanimous acceptance by JP3, but most feathered dinosaur discoveries happened after that point, and it took until 2007 before direct evidence of them was found in eudromaeosaurs (in the form of wings, rather than funky mohawks).

Jurassic Park's primary ethos, and root of its success, is in portraying more-or-less lifelike dinosaurs. As far as we know right now, there has never been an animal that looked similar to this.

:edit: Ugh, ninja'd out the ass. Really need to speed up my typing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 08, 2014, 12:04:30 AM
It was only, what a year or two prior to that that major discoveries were coming out of the Xinjiang Province, I believe?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jul 08, 2014, 12:10:52 AM
Doom... you're alone and nobody else cares. In JP3, there were, like six quills on the male's heads- not feathers... you're watching a film, aesthetic over accuracy to creatures that once lived, but have never been seen alive with the human eye. Nobody gives a shit, especially when a six foot lizard is much scarier than a six foot turkey.

Jack Horner can kiss my bootypipe and bubble some bongwater in there, with a poof of pink eye-guaranteeing smoke.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 12:15:29 AM
I was actually attacked by two wild turkeys on my way home from the book store this past winter. They were about 3.5 feet tall each. I don't know if you've ever slammed a turkey on a sidewalk by its neck before, but let me tell you I'm no longer afraid of any bird at all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jul 08, 2014, 12:15:43 AM
The amphibian DNA removed their ability to grow feathers.

Bam. Explained.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jul 08, 2014, 12:18:15 AM
Quote from: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 12:15:29 AM
I was actually attacked by two wild turkeys on my way home from the book store this past winter. They were about 3.5 feet tall each. I don't know if you've ever slammed a turkey on a sidewalk by its neck before, but let me tell you I'm no longer afraid of any bird at all.

I for one am terrified of anything bigger than a parrot.

Still doesn't mean I want to see it in a movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jul 08, 2014, 12:20:22 AM
Quote from: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 12:15:29 AM
I was actually attacked by two wild turkeys on my way home from the book store this past winter. They were about 3.5 feet tall each. I don't know if you've ever slammed a turkey on a sidewalk by its neck before, but let me tell you I'm no longer afraid of any bird at all.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jB2QFmXUCo# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jB2QFmXUCo#)

u wot m8
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jul 08, 2014, 12:20:53 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 08, 2014, 12:04:30 AM
It was only, what a year or two prior to that that major discoveries were coming out of the Xinjiang Province, I believe?

As far as I remember, the big tipping point was Microraptor, about a year after JP3 came out. Other feathered dinosaurs had been discovered earlier (Sinosauropteryx was way back in 1996), but the evidence was ambiguous, and many scientists argued whether they represented feathers at all. There was no debate about Microraptor though, it was beautifully preserved, and had pennaceous flight feathers as well as the downy filaments we'd found in other dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 08, 2014, 12:22:57 AM
The baby rexes had feathers in the TLW novel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jul 08, 2014, 12:23:41 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 07, 2014, 11:54:19 PM
You're right, and it should be that size. Want a big dromaeosaurid? Here's your answer. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utahraptor)

Yep, big guy.

Quote from: KiramidHead on Jul 07, 2014, 11:50:44 PM
And I've never seen anyone bitch about the Dilo not being accurate.

Don't get me wrong. I have loved Jurassic Park since I was 3, and I still do. It's what started my childhood love for dinos. I'm looking a little more forward to Jurassic World even.

But when someone makes an argument like "these guys should start having more feathers because it's more accurate", someone like me then  feels the urge to step up and say "Jurassic Park wasn't that accurate in the first place". Pretty damn good in places mind you which is nice, but in other places not so much, in the case of Dilophosaurus completely made up even (didn't actually have frills or venom as far as we know), but I still do enjoy Jurassic Park's take on a Dilophosaurus, it's memorable even.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 08, 2014, 12:28:09 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Jul 08, 2014, 12:10:52 AM
Doom... you're alone and nobody else cares. In JP3, there were, like six quills on the male's heads- not feathers... you're watching a film, aesthetic over accuracy to creatures that once lived, but have never been seen alive with the human eye. Nobody gives a shit, especially when a six foot lizard is much scarier than a six foot turkey.

Jack Horner can kiss my bootypipe and bubble some bongwater in there, with a poof of pink eye-guaranteeing smoke.

If you say so.

Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 08, 2014, 12:20:53 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 08, 2014, 12:04:30 AM
It was only, what a year or two prior to that that major discoveries were coming out of the Xinjiang Province, I believe?

As far as I remember, the big tipping point was Microraptor, about a year after JP3 came out. Other feathered dinosaurs had been discovered earlier (Sinosauropteryx was way back in 1996), but the evidence was ambiguous, and many scientists argued whether they represented feathers at all. There was no debate about Microraptor though, it was beautifully preserved, and had pennaceous flight feathers as well as the downy filaments we'd found in other dinosaurs.

Yeah, right after people recovered from the Archeoraptor hullabaloo, haha. Hey man, would you pay to see a fully-feathered Utahraptor on-screen?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Jul 08, 2014, 12:31:11 AM
The dinosaur designs will stay fixed into what people are familiar with from the first film, even if there are tweaks. Unless another big dinosaur movie on the scale of Jurassic Park comes out with feathered dinos we'll continue to see 90s post-JP designs for years to come. The Walking with Dinosaurs movie could've been that next big thing before it became kiddie crap.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 12:31:59 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jul 08, 2014, 12:20:22 AM
Quote from: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 12:15:29 AM
I was actually attacked by two wild turkeys on my way home from the book store this past winter. They were about 3.5 feet tall each. I don't know if you've ever slammed a turkey on a sidewalk by its neck before, but let me tell you I'm no longer afraid of any bird at all.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jB2QFmXUCo# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jB2QFmXUCo#)

u wot m8
You just need to get a choke hold on it.

Take a peck to the arm and strangle that thing. It's not like it's hiding knives under it's feathers like a shady fake Rolex dealer in New York.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jul 08, 2014, 12:34:33 AM
Quote from: Gilfryd on Jul 08, 2014, 12:31:11 AM
The dinosaur designs will stay fixed into what people are familiar with from the first film, even if there are tweaks. Unless another big dinosaur movie on the scale of Jurassic Park comes out with feathered dinos we'll continue to see 90s post-JP designs for years to come. The Walking with Dinosaurs movie could've been that next big thing before it became kiddie crap.
I think it's gonna be a LONG time before we get another JP-level dinosaur series. I can't really even think of anything that could rival it really.

Quote from: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 12:31:59 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jul 08, 2014, 12:20:22 AM
Quote from: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 12:15:29 AM
I was actually attacked by two wild turkeys on my way home from the book store this past winter. They were about 3.5 feet tall each. I don't know if you've ever slammed a turkey on a sidewalk by its neck before, but let me tell you I'm no longer afraid of any bird at all.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jB2QFmXUCo# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jB2QFmXUCo#)

u wot m8
You just need to get a choke hold on it.

Take a peck to the arm and strangle that thing. It's not like it's hiding knives under it's feathers like a shady fake Rolex dealer in New York.

They do have feet though, usually with the addition of massive talons or claws or other terrifying things that can probably do more damage than their beak and, when the creature is being held by the neck, could probably easily reach your stomach area...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jul 08, 2014, 12:36:23 AM
ps- your raptor jesus is a disrespectful portrayal of both raptors and jesus

not enough flowing hair, not enough feathers
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 08, 2014, 12:38:00 AM
They should add feathers in Carnosaur 4.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jul 08, 2014, 12:40:59 AM
Here is the new Velociraptor vocals.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Owj52XhoxI#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Owj52XhoxI#ws)

The attack comes not from the front, but from the side.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jul 08, 2014, 12:43:47 AM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Jul 08, 2014, 12:40:59 AM
Here is the new Velociraptor vocals.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Owj52XhoxI#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Owj52XhoxI#ws)

The attack comes not from the front, but from the sides.

I think this would honestly be better, and much more frightening in an intense chase scene that will probably be in the movie.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sr_SGkqrrdM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sr_SGkqrrdM#ws)

Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
"It's calling for help!..."
Spoiler
ECH! ECH!
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 12:44:40 AM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Jul 08, 2014, 12:34:33 AM
They do have feet though, usually with the addition of massive talons or claws or other terrifying things that can probably do more damage than their beak and, when the creature is being held by the neck, could probably easily reach your stomach area...
Indeed.

But I'm not going to just hold it and hope it calms down...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jul 08, 2014, 12:47:53 AM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Jul 08, 2014, 12:23:41 AMBut when someone makes an argument like "these guys should start having more feathers because it's more accurate", someone like me then  feels the urge to step up and say "Jurassic Park wasn't that accurate in the first place". Pretty damn good in places mind you which is nice, but in other places not so much, in the case of Dilophosaurus completely made up even (didn't actually have frills or venom as far as we know), but I still do enjoy Jurassic Park's take on a Dilophosaurus, it's memorable even.

There was still some semi-scientific basis for those decisions. At the time, Dilophosaurus was thought to have a very weak bite, and many palaeontologists thought it wouldn't have been capable of killing large prey without bending its skull. Crichton used a bit of imagination, and probably picked up on some speculation floating around, and gave it a venomous bite to solve the question of how Dilophosaurus hunted. The point was that some physical traits just don't fossilise.

For the film, they took that concept further, by adding the frill. No, there's no evidence that any theropod had a wide, fleshy neck frill, but such a thing wouldn't be preserved in 99% of cases. That's the whole point of Dilophosaurus, as portrayed in Jurassic Park - what could have been.


Quote from: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 12:31:59 AM[Cassowary]
You just need to get a choke hold on it.

Take a peck to the arm and strangle that thing. It's not like it's hiding knives under it's feathers like a shady fake Rolex dealer in New York.

A cassowary has thigh muscles that're almost as wide as its torso, gigantic blade-like claws, and jump ridiculously high. I wouldn't advise tangling with one if you fancy your intestines - give them flesh-tearing teeth, predatory inclination and pack hunting, and you essentially have yourself a Deinonychus.


Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 08, 2014, 12:28:09 AM
Hey man, would you pay to see a fully-feathered Utahraptor on-screen?

That I would. With the right design, they could be pretty damn creepy.

I think this is what people are forgetting - expecting that a feathered dromie would just resemble the dreaded "six foot turkey". Think about this - an iguana isn't any more inherently creepy than a parrot. It's up to the designers to find a look that works, because Jurassic Park's raptors were never automatically destined to be as menacing as they were.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jul 08, 2014, 12:55:19 AM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Jul 08, 2014, 12:43:47 AM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Jul 08, 2014, 12:40:59 AM
Here is the new Velociraptor vocals.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Owj52XhoxI#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Owj52XhoxI#ws)

The attack comes not from the front, but from the sides.

I think this would honestly be better, and much more frightening in an intense chase scene that will probably be in the movie.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sr_SGkqrrdM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sr_SGkqrrdM#ws)

Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
"It's calling for help!..."
Spoiler
ECH! ECH!
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]

I shat myself.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jul 08, 2014, 12:55:56 AM
Better pic....

Spoiler
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpf1/t1.0-9/10464094_661264080628265_7218562283257840081_n.jpg)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jul 08, 2014, 12:56:36 AM
 :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jul 08, 2014, 01:00:01 AM
Either Cvalda got ninja'd there or I'm missing something in Requiem's post...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jul 08, 2014, 01:01:33 AM
Damn ninja-ing.

I was laughing at the WoodECH.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Jul 08, 2014, 01:04:10 AM
Dese spoilers.

dem designs

oh gawd, it's f**king beautiful. :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 01:05:10 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 08, 2014, 12:47:53 AM
Quote from: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 12:31:59 AM[Cassowary]
You just need to get a choke hold on it.

Take a peck to the arm and strangle that thing. It's not like it's hiding knives under it's feathers like a shady fake Rolex dealer in New York.

A cassowary has thigh muscles that're almost as wide as its torso, gigantic blade-like claws, and jump ridiculously high. I wouldn't advise tangling with one if you fancy your intestines - give them flesh-tearing teeth, predatory inclination and pack hunting, and you essentially have yourself a Deinonychus.
They weigh 129 pounds on average according to Wikipedia.

I could toss something that light around no problem. Maybe spin it around and break its juicy bird thighs against a tree.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jul 08, 2014, 01:06:29 AM
Quote from: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 01:05:10 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 08, 2014, 12:47:53 AM
Quote from: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 12:31:59 AM[Cassowary]
You just need to get a choke hold on it.

Take a peck to the arm and strangle that thing. It's not like it's hiding knives under it's feathers like a shady fake Rolex dealer in New York.

A cassowary has thigh muscles that're almost as wide as its torso, gigantic blade-like claws, and jump ridiculously high. I wouldn't advise tangling with one if you fancy your intestines - give them flesh-tearing teeth, predatory inclination and pack hunting, and you essentially have yourself a Deinonychus.
They weigh 129 pounds on average according to Wikipedia.

I could toss something that light around no problem. Maybe spin it around and break its juicy bird thighs against a tree.
Please do us a favor then and walk into the cassowary exhibit at a nearby zoo. Show it what you're made of.

Literally. When it disembowels you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 01:08:31 AM
Alas somebody stopped me entering the babboon enclosure last time I made a similar statement. I doubt they'd let me in the cassowary exhibit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jul 08, 2014, 01:13:35 AM
If you could take on a cassowary you can take on a human. Don't let those apes stop you from achieving your goals BANE!!! You choose your own path!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jul 08, 2014, 01:15:58 AM
Quote from: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 01:08:31 AM
Alas somebody stopped me entering the babboon enclosure last time I made a similar statement. I doubt they'd let me in the cassowary exhibit.
Too scared?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F38.media.tumblr.com%2F9c5abd028ae1f20de10c124e18400f46%2Ftumblr_mwryabQKMd1rhd1xfo1_500.gif&hash=a1b3b1ccfd78ea6bdaa6ac8001781c0614729439)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 08, 2014, 01:19:33 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Jul 08, 2014, 12:36:23 AM
ps- your raptor jesus is a disrespectful portrayal of both raptors and jesus

not enough flowing hair, not enough feathers

Blame it on a tight budget. Funnily enough, a paleontologist actually asked me about the lack of feathers.

Quote from: KNIGHT on Jul 08, 2014, 12:34:33 AM
Quote from: Gilfryd on Jul 08, 2014, 12:31:11 AM
The dinosaur designs will stay fixed into what people are familiar with from the first film, even if there are tweaks. Unless another big dinosaur movie on the scale of Jurassic Park comes out with feathered dinos we'll continue to see 90s post-JP designs for years to come. The Walking with Dinosaurs movie could've been that next big thing before it became kiddie crap.
I think it's gonna be a LONG time before we get another JP-level dinosaur series. I can't really even think of anything that could rival it really.

Walking With Dinosaurs could go places, provided a sequel doesn't have those stupid voiceovers.


Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 08, 2014, 12:47:53 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 08, 2014, 12:28:09 AM
Hey man, would you pay to see a fully-feathered Utahraptor on-screen?

That I would. With the right design, they could be pretty damn creepy.

I think this is what people are forgetting - expecting that a feathered dromie would just resemble the dreaded "six foot turkey". Think about this - an iguana isn't any more inherently creepy than a parrot. It's up to the designers to find a look that works, because Jurassic Park's raptors were never automatically destined to be as menacing as they were.

This guy...he knows what's up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 01:20:25 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jul 08, 2014, 01:15:58 AM
Quote from: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 01:08:31 AM
Alas somebody stopped me entering the babboon enclosure last time I made a similar statement. I doubt they'd let me in the cassowary exhibit.
Too scared?

http://38.media.tumblr.com/9c5abd028ae1f20de10c124e18400f46/tumblr_mwryabQKMd1rhd1xfo1_500.gif
No I'll try again, but I'm dead serious about that baboon thing.

Me and a friend were trying to convince my other friends that we could kick a baboon's ass because they're small and they only have teeth as a weapon, so why would we be frightened if we could just kick it away or punch it before it bit us. So finally after much teasing I sized up a baboon behind the glass and tried to enter the enclosure from the zookeeper's entrance but was stopped by a very, VERY angry lady who told me it was dangerous. So I left.

With the cassowary exhibit I guess I COULD just climb over the ledge, but it is a steeper drop into the enclosure. I'll have to do some recon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 08, 2014, 01:22:14 AM
Quote from: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 01:20:25 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jul 08, 2014, 01:15:58 AM
Quote from: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 01:08:31 AM
Alas somebody stopped me entering the babboon enclosure last time I made a similar statement. I doubt they'd let me in the cassowary exhibit.
Too scared?

http://38.media.tumblr.com/9c5abd028ae1f20de10c124e18400f46/tumblr_mwryabQKMd1rhd1xfo1_500.gif
No I'll try again, but I'm dead serious about that baboon thing.

Me and a friend were trying to convince my other friends that we could kick a baboon's ass because they're small and they only have teeth as a weapon, so why would we be frightened if we could just kick it away or punch it before it bit us. So finally after much teasing I sized up a baboon behind the glass and tried to enter the enclosure from the zookeeper's entrance but was stopped by a very, VERY angry lady who told me it was dangerous. So I left.

With the cassowary exhibit I guess I COULD just climb over the ledge, but it is a steeper drop into the enclosure. I'll have to do some recon.

That's one of the stupidest stories I've heard! :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jul 08, 2014, 01:26:11 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 08, 2014, 01:19:33 AM
a paleontologist actually asked me about the lack of feathers.
well that's rude

you shoulda told him it was due to raptorcancer

Spoiler


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkxdosn8sOo#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkxdosn8sOo#ws)

Spoiler
I'll be here all week
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 01:28:21 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 08, 2014, 01:22:14 AM
Quote from: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 01:20:25 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jul 08, 2014, 01:15:58 AM
Quote from: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 01:08:31 AM
Alas somebody stopped me entering the babboon enclosure last time I made a similar statement. I doubt they'd let me in the cassowary exhibit.
Too scared?

http://38.media.tumblr.com/9c5abd028ae1f20de10c124e18400f46/tumblr_mwryabQKMd1rhd1xfo1_500.gif
No I'll try again, but I'm dead serious about that baboon thing.

Me and a friend were trying to convince my other friends that we could kick a baboon's ass because they're small and they only have teeth as a weapon, so why would we be frightened if we could just kick it away or punch it before it bit us. So finally after much teasing I sized up a baboon behind the glass and tried to enter the enclosure from the zookeeper's entrance but was stopped by a very, VERY angry lady who told me it was dangerous. So I left.

With the cassowary exhibit I guess I COULD just climb over the ledge, but it is a steeper drop into the enclosure. I'll have to do some recon.

That's one of the stupidest stories I've heard! :D
I don't see why. The baboon I sized up looked alot like this one (http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/images/stories/baboon250.jpg), and even yawned at me as if to showcase its teeth. I was like (in my head) 'f**k off you red assed prick Imma kick your teeth back into your head' and tried getting in.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 08, 2014, 01:28:55 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Jul 08, 2014, 01:26:11 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 08, 2014, 01:19:33 AM
a paleontologist actually asked me about the lack of feathers.
well that's rude

you shoulda told him it was due to raptorcancer

Spoiler


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkxdosn8sOo#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkxdosn8sOo#ws)

Spoiler
I'll be here all week
[close]
[close]

Believe it or not I did...sort of. I called it being stuck in an evolutionary quandary.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 08, 2014, 01:29:42 AM
Bane's gonna give the baboons a taste for Canadians. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jul 08, 2014, 01:29:56 AM
Quote from: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 01:28:21 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 08, 2014, 01:22:14 AM
Quote from: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 01:20:25 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jul 08, 2014, 01:15:58 AM
Quote from: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 01:08:31 AM
Alas somebody stopped me entering the babboon enclosure last time I made a similar statement. I doubt they'd let me in the cassowary exhibit.
Too scared?

http://38.media.tumblr.com/9c5abd028ae1f20de10c124e18400f46/tumblr_mwryabQKMd1rhd1xfo1_500.gif
No I'll try again, but I'm dead serious about that baboon thing.

Me and a friend were trying to convince my other friends that we could kick a baboon's ass because they're small and they only have teeth as a weapon, so why would we be frightened if we could just kick it away or punch it before it bit us. So finally after much teasing I sized up a baboon behind the glass and tried to enter the enclosure from the zookeeper's entrance but was stopped by a very, VERY angry lady who told me it was dangerous. So I left.

With the cassowary exhibit I guess I COULD just climb over the ledge, but it is a steeper drop into the enclosure. I'll have to do some recon.

That's one of the stupidest stories I've heard! :D
I don't see why. The baboon I sized up looked alot like this one (http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/images/stories/baboon250.jpg), and even yawned at me as if to showcase its teeth. I was like (in my head) 'f**k off you red assed prick Imma kick your teeth back into your head' and tried getting in.

Did it ever occur to you that he was just waiting for you to get closer?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 01:31:34 AM
I was waiting for HIM to get closer so I could knock some sense into him.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jul 08, 2014, 01:37:00 AM
I'm thinking he had all the patience in the world, and was waiting for you to come closer before the attack came from the side.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 08, 2014, 01:39:24 AM
Keeping in mind the environent you were entering. Imagine if you got in and slipped on mud? They'd be on you like a shot. Not to mention any high ground they could reach to pounce; from above or all angles.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 01:41:33 AM
There were only three baboons, two females and a male, and there was no mud.

The females were off hiding while the male was just chilling, staring out the window.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jul 08, 2014, 01:43:23 AM
...Bane posts are actually much like Alex Jones conspiracy theories.

They are equally as hard to believe.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 08, 2014, 01:44:10 AM
And 100x more entertaining than an Uwe Boll movie, right Blabel? ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jul 08, 2014, 01:44:21 AM
Quote from: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 01:28:21 AM
I don't see why. The baboon I sized up looked alot like this one (http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/images/stories/baboon250.jpg), and even yawned at me as if to showcase its teeth. I was like (in my head) 'f**k off you red assed prick Imma kick your teeth back into your head' and tried getting in.
Pretty sure that was just you seeing your reflection :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 01:45:17 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Jul 08, 2014, 01:43:23 AM
...Bane posts are actually much like Alex Jones conspiracy theories.

They are equally as hard to believe.
I don't understand why it's so hard to believe. This one friend is always boasting about the things he thinks he can do (like take a gorilla down with a sword...I actually agree), and on this occasion I agreed with him while my friends kept putting our ideas down.

Quote from: Cvalda on Jul 08, 2014, 01:44:21 AM
Quote from: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 01:28:21 AM
I don't see why. The baboon I sized up looked alot like this one (http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/images/stories/baboon250.jpg), and even yawned at me as if to showcase its teeth. I was like (in my head) 'f**k off you red assed prick Imma kick your teeth back into your head' and tried getting in.
Pretty sure that was just you seeing your reflection :-\
Maybe. Look in the glass yourself:
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-ea1z49fA2Io%2FTVeWuzqhtMI%2FAAAAAAAABZU%2Fjk7K_g_wOh4%2Fs400%2FBaboon_Butt_w_Baby_-_BxExAxTxE.JPG&hash=1eb37b554619af0f94ea391b3f2df9397ae44a92)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jul 08, 2014, 01:47:33 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jul 08, 2014, 01:44:10 AM
And 100x more entertaining than an Uwe Boll movie, right Blabel? ;)

Yup. A train wreck is possibly more entertaining than a Uwe Boll film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jul 08, 2014, 01:48:04 AM
Quote from: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 01:45:17 AM
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ea1z49fA2Io/TVeWuzqhtMI/AAAAAAAABZU/jk7K_g_wOh4/s400/Baboon_Butt_w_Baby_-_BxExAxTxE.JPG
No one wants to see your childhood photos, BANE.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jul 08, 2014, 02:13:21 AM
BANE's current posts in this thread remind me of this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhHi_PCBQX0# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhHi_PCBQX0#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 02:17:37 AM
I'd fight a tiger with a spear.  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jul 08, 2014, 02:18:43 AM
Not bare handed? What are you a f**king weenie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: coolbreeze on Jul 08, 2014, 02:20:22 AM
I like how this thread had turned into "can BANE fight it?"  :laugh:

Where's Chronicle, we may need a poll.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 02:20:45 AM
That guy's an idiot though. He hasn't thought anything through. A tiger bare handed? Please.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 08, 2014, 02:22:10 AM
Bane was the inspiration behind the Messin' with Sasquatchads.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jul 08, 2014, 02:23:19 AM
Quote from: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 02:20:45 AM
That guy's an idiot though. He hasn't thought anything through. A tiger bare handed? Please.

Well if you could take on a raptor, the big bird I can't remember the name of, and a baboon, a tiger just seems like the next logical step to take on bare handed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 02:26:54 AM
I said I could take on a raptor wearing chain mail.

I could kick the f**k out of a cassowhere'smyheadohBANEkickeditoff or whatever it's called.

I could punt a baboon into oblivion.

I could NOT fight a tiger without a spear or something. Maybe a rifle.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jul 08, 2014, 02:27:57 AM
y u gotta be a weenie BANE. BARE HANDED OR NOT AT ALL.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 08, 2014, 02:30:08 AM
I dunno, I've take down Pterosaurs before...

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsurvivalhorroronline.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F02%2FSilent-Hill-Air-Screamer.jpg&hash=4563fdd2fe5217924c4d24cdf32baf602b1ee2f0)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 08, 2014, 08:48:59 AM
Come to think of it, I could take down Bane.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-wuz-FTmmtnY%2FUpnpZZJbt2I%2FAAAAAAAABBg%2FC4yw129Zbcc%2Fs1600%2Ftumblr_mrqwcjHtWN1s05z7qo1_500.gif&hash=6b7c9d9e8c168caa7bdc750aae80ae8915695e73)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jul 08, 2014, 09:25:45 AM
Welp, this has somehow become the most stupid thread on the forums, without even bringing up Jurassic Park 3.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 08, 2014, 10:47:10 AM
BANE'S Big Day Out...

Spoiler
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=paa2mNp2_O0
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 08, 2014, 11:21:22 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 08, 2014, 09:25:45 AM
Welp, this has somehow become the most stupid thread on the forums, without even bringing up Jurassic Park 3.

The most stupid? You haven't been exploring much.

But getting back to a JP-related discussion, a person on Facebook made some terrific comments about why the no-feather raptors matter.

QuoteIt wasn't just the special effects, it was the fact that the T. rex was a fast predator with its tail off the ground, the raptors were socially complex, the brachiosaur wasn't in a swamp, the dinosaurs were described as homeothermic endotherms, and, most importantly, it was stated, in the film, that *birds are dinosaurs*, going so far as to show birds flying over the ocean just before the credits. They seem dated now, but up until then, then general public hadn't seen dinosaurs depicted in such a way outside of obscure documentaries. The original film had a huge impact on people's perception of dinosaurs.

With all that considered, it saddens me to see people defending this garbage out of nostalgia. "In-universe" rationalizations are less important to me than making something more than a mindless special effects spectacle that serves as nothing more than escapism for a culture that is woefully ignorant about science. Filmmakers who are more than just hacks typically strive for something more than special-effects-filled nonsense

Continued:

Quote...but this is related to a trend in Hollywood that has been a source of endless frustration. I'm one of those few people who enjoys science fiction that contains actual science. The defense of such laziness just reinforces the misconception that science ruins fun, makes things boring and that science fiction is somehow how hurt, ironically, by some scientific rigor. Some of the best science fiction stories I've ever read in my life were hard science fiction novels. As an example, the space opera settings that were the most thought-provoking and fascinating, for me at least, were the ones without faster than light travel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 08, 2014, 11:35:33 AM
The JP books and films are all about our relationship with control. Not portraying dinosaurs to 100% accuracy. That's a marketing gimmick.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Jul 08, 2014, 12:03:57 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 08, 2014, 09:25:45 AM
Welp, this has somehow become the most stupid thread on the forums, without even bringing up Jurassic Park 3.
:laugh:

My work here is finished.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 08, 2014, 12:16:04 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 08, 2014, 11:35:33 AM
The JP books and films are all about our relationship with control. Not portraying dinosaurs to 100% accuracy. That's a marketing gimmick.

Crichton made a point of changing the way the dinosaurs were seen in TLW novel. I'm pretty sure he would've supported scientifically-accurate dinosaurs on-screen. Also, given how these films shape the way people see dinosaurs, there's no real reason to not portray them accurately.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 08, 2014, 01:07:28 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 08, 2014, 12:16:04 PM
I'm pretty sure he would've supported scientifically-accurate dinosaurs on-screen.

He didn't for three films.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 08, 2014, 01:15:52 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 08, 2014, 01:07:28 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 08, 2014, 12:16:04 PM
I'm pretty sure he would've supported scientifically-accurate dinosaurs on-screen.

He didn't for three films.

But he did in his books. He wrote what was considered accurate for the time. I can't comment on his involvement with the films only because I don't know how much creative input he had, aside from co-writing the script for the first film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 08, 2014, 01:24:41 PM
Exactly his books.

Either way you cut it all this boils down to is a design choice. Do you like the featherless design or not?

Nothing would change if the dinosaurs had feathers children and adults will get fansinated either way. If you think that is a false advertisement of dinosaurs fine but don't blame the film creators for choosing to make their own film.

Art inspires science inspires art dude.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 08, 2014, 01:44:42 PM
It's not a matter of what I like, it's a matter of what's accurate. I don't mind seeing old-school dinosaur movies that have them dragging their tails because it's fun to see what we thought of dinosaurs back then, but the reason why their depiction in films has changed since the 1960s is because of the evolution of dino science.

Again, nothing is lost by portraying them in a realistic manner. Why is everyone so against this idea?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 08, 2014, 01:58:11 PM
Because back in '93 they weren't thinking dinosaurs in 2014 would have feathers.

Don't forget the thousands who are working, discovering and publishing stuff about feathered dinosaurs which vastly outweighs what "damage" JW will do by having featherless dinosaurs.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 08, 2014, 02:18:26 PM
There was speculation of dinosaurs being feathered back in the early 90s. Hell, the link between dinosaurs and birds dates as far back as 1859.

As for the published material, few people read the news reports, let alone the actual studies. It's not exactly front page material.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 08, 2014, 02:23:09 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 08, 2014, 02:18:26 PM
As for the published material, few people read the news reports, let alone the actual studies. It's not exactly front page material.

...and the filmmakers get blamed for people's laziness.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 08, 2014, 02:27:50 PM
Because they ultimately shape how people view certain aspects of life, especially that which is not readily viewable, so to speak. You can't say with a straight face that most people's understanding of, and exposure to, dinosaurs comes from Jurassic Park.

People don't read the studies not just because they're lazy, but because most don't have the time, nor the technical understanding to navigate their way through scientific jargon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 08, 2014, 02:38:58 PM
Still we can't dictate that the dinosaurs of JP should have feathers. That's not our choice.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jul 08, 2014, 02:44:01 PM
For interests sake:

In the John Sayles script for JP4, he just named all the raptors as Deinonychus.. because that's what they are based on, essentially.
He also gave the Dilophosaurus a completely new scientific name (Chlamidosaurus Sputori).. because the dilo in the original film is so different from the actual creature.
So yeah, it felt like it was gonna be a big retcon, pretty much. 

I think that at some point in the history of these films they wanted to get them more aligned to scientific knowledge. No idea if it was something that Sayles wanted to do or Spielberg.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 08, 2014, 02:55:38 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 08, 2014, 02:38:58 PM
Still we can't dictate that the dinosaurs of JP should have feathers. That's not our choice.

That doesn't mean some of us cannot express our dislike of that choice.

Quote from: Blacklabel on Jul 08, 2014, 02:44:01 PM
For interests sake:

In the John Sayles script for JP4, he just named all the raptors as Deinonychus.. because that's what they are based on, essentially.
He also gave the Dilophosaurus a completely new scientific name (Chlamidosaurus Sputori).. because the dilo in the original film is so different from the actual creature.
So yeah, it felt like it was gonna be a big retcon, pretty much. 

I think that at some point in the history of these films they wanted to get them more aligned to scientific knowledge. No idea if it was something that Sayles wanted to do or Spielberg.

Heh; the more you know.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jul 08, 2014, 03:13:51 PM
Alien 3 and the Jurassiccast fellas should invite Sayles to a podcast... and find out. :P

Jurassic World is apparently still following through with the central idea of that script...
Spoiler
(genetically modified dinosaurs that can change skin colour)
[close]

the failed attempts at developing JP4 are an interesting period in the series history... and it would provide for a damn fine podcast. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 08, 2014, 04:59:13 PM
Crichton's Dinosaurs were mutants... the Velociraptors could change colour like chameleons, the T.Rex had an enormous tongue to catch prey, and the Compsognathuses were five-fingered (something that is focused on and said to make them "look human").
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jul 08, 2014, 05:05:59 PM
I gotta read that someday. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jul 08, 2014, 05:48:25 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jul 08, 2014, 04:59:13 PM
Crichton's Dinosaurs were mutants... the Velociraptors could change colour like chameleons, the T.Rex had an enormous tongue to catch prey, and the Compsognathuses were five-fingered (something that is focused on and said to make them "look human").

Again - it's imaginative, rather than inaccurate.
Procompsognathus is the exception, but it's an honest mistake rather than anything willful. It was an early dinosaur, and the most basal examples of the group did have five fingers. What I find peculiar is why Crichton chose to feature such a poorly-known and dubiously classified animal.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 08, 2014, 06:24:36 PM
He also decided to insert Ceradactylus and other, more obscure prehistoric things. All of those are wildly speculative -- and the novel makes the point that the Dinosaurs are not-quite Dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 08, 2014, 06:33:07 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 08, 2014, 05:48:25 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jul 08, 2014, 04:59:13 PM
Crichton's Dinosaurs were mutants... the Velociraptors could change colour like chameleons, the T.Rex had an enormous tongue to catch prey, and the Compsognathuses were five-fingered (something that is focused on and said to make them "look human").

Again - it's imaginative, rather than inaccurate.
Procompsognathus is the exception, but it's an honest mistake rather than anything willful. It was an early dinosaur, and the most basal examples of the group did have five fingers. What I find peculiar is why Crichton chose to feature such a poorly-known and dubiously classified animal.

Pretty sure that back then it was classified as a full-blown early theropod. I remember reading about it in some of my kiddie dino books.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 08, 2014, 10:50:08 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 08, 2014, 02:55:38 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 08, 2014, 02:38:58 PM
Still we can't dictate that the dinosaurs of JP should have feathers. That's not our choice.

That doesn't mean some of us cannot express our dislike of that choice.

Of course not. Complain by all means. 8)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 08, 2014, 10:54:08 PM
Like I said, Carnosaur 4 can always take up the feathered dinos if JP won't do it. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 08, 2014, 10:57:41 PM
Damn right. Stupid no feathered inaccurate Carnosaur movies. :-*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 08, 2014, 11:22:21 PM
Carnosaur always sucked to begin with. Hell, even the title is wrong.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 09, 2014, 11:05:12 AM
Jurassic Park's title is wrong if you count the actual number of dinosaurs from the Jurassic period that feature in the film. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2014, 11:23:16 AM
Yes it is. That doesn't change what I said about Carnosaur being a bad title. It's actually scientifically incorrect. Tyrannosaurids weren't carnosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Greedo on Jul 09, 2014, 11:31:14 AM
There a quite a few incorrect things in JP but we still love it <3
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jul 09, 2014, 11:42:04 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 08, 2014, 11:22:21 PM
Carnosaur always sucked to begin with. Hell, even the title is wrong.

Gawd how I loved Carnosaur as a kid. It's one of those movies that's so great even though you consciously know it's bad.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2014, 11:44:00 AM
Quote from: Imp on Jul 09, 2014, 11:31:14 AM
There a quite a few incorrect things in JP but we still love it <3

Of course we do. I just don't understand why pointing out its flaws is so problematic. If anything, a real fan would accept the flaws, discuss them, and work for/discuss solutions.

Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jul 09, 2014, 11:42:04 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 08, 2014, 11:22:21 PM
Carnosaur always sucked to begin with. Hell, even the title is wrong.

Gawd how I loved Carnosaur as a kid. It's one of those movies that's so great even though you consciously know it's bad.

I first saw it when I was eight I think. Yeah, as a kid, I liked it. But I could never stomach it today.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Jul 09, 2014, 12:21:33 PM
Yo but feathers look dumb...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 09, 2014, 12:54:33 PM
I don't care for the inaccuracy flaws all that much. Since the first film they always balanced between realism and spectacle, sometimes sacrificing one for the other and vice-versa. The films started from novels with imperfect Dinosaurs. Et cetera.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2014, 01:16:40 PM
Indeed they did but it's hard for me to watch them without picking apart what's wrong. It's one thing to give a T.Rex slightly larger arms or modify the Spinosaurus head. It's something else to create an entirely new creature, a la Dilophosaurus or Velociraptor.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 09, 2014, 01:20:43 PM
The solution is have a new dinosaur character with feathers, and correct to our understanding of that new dinosaur/s today.

But don't sling feathers on an already established character who has none.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2014, 01:29:01 PM
Why not simply change it? Again, what is lost? It's not like adding feathers would do something like, I dunno, cease the raptor from being predatory and chasing humans.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 09, 2014, 01:40:07 PM
Nothing if they explain they refined the cloning process, i.e establish a new type of raptor character.

But the creators haven't chosen that route so we have the original designs back. And there's nothing wrong with that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jul 09, 2014, 01:54:32 PM
The look of the Raptor and the Rex in the original film is pretty damn iconic. Dont mess with it in these films. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jul 09, 2014, 02:07:17 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 09, 2014, 01:40:07 PMBut the creators haven't chosen that route so we have the original designs back. And there's nothing wrong with that.

There is everything wrong with that. It's against the ethos of the original film, and the book. Jurassic Park was responsible for overturning nearly a century of complete bullshit that had stubbornly refused to leave the public consciousness, despite being over twenty years into the dinosaur revolution.
It's now around twenty years since Jurassic Park and the first Chinese protofeather discoveries, and this time the new film is part of the problem, not the solution.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2014, 02:14:23 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 09, 2014, 02:07:17 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 09, 2014, 01:40:07 PMBut the creators haven't chosen that route so we have the original designs back. And there's nothing wrong with that.

There is everything wrong with that. It's against the ethos of the original film, and the book. Jurassic Park was responsible for overturning nearly a century of complete bullshit that had stubbornly refused to leave the public consciousness, despite being over twenty years into the dinosaur revolution.
It's now around twenty years since Jurassic Park and the first Chinese protofeather discoveries, and this time the new film is part of the problem, not the solution.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F37.media.tumblr.com%2Fbd2dfe33c53aa65137b6e69144162328%2Ftumblr_mlsmy1ljp01qmgcj7o1_400.gif&hash=fe102a3dfb90039c32d3926ab9aae52e4e5d46a8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Jul 09, 2014, 02:32:36 PM
Yeah but they look stupid though
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2014, 02:44:23 PM
That's purely a matter of opinion. I think the featherless ones look stupid, so here we are.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Jul 09, 2014, 03:08:13 PM
Really?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2014, 03:33:26 PM
I'd rather see something more accurate, as we've already established.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 09, 2014, 03:34:40 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 09, 2014, 02:07:17 PM
It's now around twenty years since Jurassic Park and the first Chinese protofeather discoveries, and this time the new film is part of the problem, not the solution.

Again Jurassic Park was never about portraying the dinosaurs to 100% accuracy. It's a story about our relationship with control. The recreated dinosaurs are not, and never were, dinosaurs to our complete understanding of them; whether its our knowledge from the 80's, 90's or 00's.

It'll get a lot of children and adults fascinated with dinosaurs again. It's those people who will be dedicated enough to research dinosaurs and discover what they're really like. But that is not the job of JW.

It's a work of fiction not a documentary.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jul 09, 2014, 03:44:41 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 09, 2014, 03:34:40 PM
Again Jurassic Park was never about portraying the dinosaurs to 100% accuracy. It's a story about our relationship with control.
Step aside Michael Haneke, Jurassic Park is some deep shit :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 09, 2014, 03:49:05 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi26.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fc116%2FProphallictic%2Fbitches_jurassicpark.jpg&hash=fcd6f68ca95e71341d0b10923901b00808b22894)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jul 09, 2014, 03:49:17 PM
Quote from: BANE on Jul 09, 2014, 02:32:36 PM
[Feather stuff]

Thing is, most proto-feathers looked more like hair than the flight feathers we're familiar with. Some might've been short and sleek like a lionness, others shaggy like a mammoth, others fluffy like an ostrich or cassowary. Pennaceous (quilled) feathers were only present in a handful of families, and even then, just on the arms and tail in the flightless species.

Utahraptor, in Crash McCreery style. (http://fc05.deviantart.net/fs70/i/2011/302/1/a/utahraptor_by_monopteryx-d4eb8f3.jpg)
Shaggy therizinosaur. (http://svpow.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/therizinosaurus.jpg)




Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 09, 2014, 03:34:40 PMIt's a work of fiction not a documentary.

Featuring a twenty-year-old dromaeosaurid is like if Jurassic Park had featured a tail/stomach dragging Brontosaurus which couldn't survive out of water, just because it's what people were familiar with.

It's a dinosaur movie. If you're not going to show dinosaurs in your dinosaur movie, then you might as well just tap on the camera and talk to yourself.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2014, 03:52:12 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 09, 2014, 03:34:40 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 09, 2014, 02:07:17 PM
It's now around twenty years since Jurassic Park and the first Chinese protofeather discoveries, and this time the new film is part of the problem, not the solution.

Again Jurassic Park was never about portraying the dinosaurs to 100% accuracy. It's a story about our relationship with control. The recreated dinosaurs are not, and never were, dinosaurs to our complete understanding of them; whether its our knowledge from the 80's, 90's or 00's.

It'll get a lot of children and adults fascinated with dinosaurs again. It's those people who will be dedicated enough to research dinosaurs and discover what they're really like. But that is not the job of JW.

It's a work of fiction not a documentary.

What if I told you that paleoartists and paleontologists are starting to come out and saying that telling others that JP got them into their respective fields is an embarrassment? That's literally the reaction I'm seeing on Facebook in regards to the raptor picture.

Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 09, 2014, 03:49:17 PM
It's a dinosaur movie. If you're not going to show dinosaurs in your dinosaur movie, then you might as well just tap on the camera and talk to yourself.

That should've been Malcolm's line after knocking on the jeep cam, lol.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 09, 2014, 03:58:14 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 09, 2014, 03:49:17 PM
Featuring a twenty-year-old dromaeosaurid is like if Jurassic Park had featured a tail/stomach dragging Brontosaurus which couldn't survive out of water, just because it's what people were familiar with.

It's nothing like that and you know it.

Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 09, 2014, 03:49:17 PM
It's a dinosaur movie. If you're not going to show dinosaurs in your dinosaur movie, then you might as well just tap on the camera and talk to yourself.

It's a cloned dinosaur movie.

When did the fiction become reality to you?

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2014, 03:52:12 PM
What if I told you that paleoartists and paleontologists are starting to come out and saying that telling others that JP got them into their respective fields is an embarrassment? That's literally the reaction I'm seeing on Facebook in regards to the raptor picture.

I'd reply saying: They're human and they make mistakes. paleoartists and paleontologists were awesome to get into the field because of Jurassic Park but Jurassic World is not that movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jul 09, 2014, 04:04:24 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 09, 2014, 03:58:14 PMIt's nothing like that and you know it.

Please, enlighten us on the difference.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2014, 04:12:30 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 09, 2014, 03:58:14 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 09, 2014, 03:49:17 PM
Featuring a twenty-year-old dromaeosaurid is like if Jurassic Park had featured a tail/stomach dragging Brontosaurus which couldn't survive out of water, just because it's what people were familiar with.

It's nothing like that and you know it.

How? At one point, that was familiar and normal, but the films evolved with the science. That's why Brachiosaurus in Jurassic Park is on land, with its tail off the ground.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 09, 2014, 03:58:14 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2014, 03:52:12 PM
What if I told you that paleoartists and paleontologists are starting to come out and saying that telling others that JP got them into their respective fields is an embarrassment? That's literally the reaction I'm seeing on Facebook in regards to the raptor picture.

I'd reply saying: They're human and they make mistakes. paleoartists and paleontologists were awesome to get into the field because of Jurassic Park but Jurassic World is not that movie.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 09, 2014, 03:34:40 PMIt'll get a lot of children and adults fascinated with dinosaurs again.

You just implied that JW will generate people's interest in dinosaurs and dino science. If anything, that's only going to cause more irritation (to say the least) with inaccurate dinos onscreen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 09, 2014, 04:15:34 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 09, 2014, 04:04:24 PM
Please, enlighten us on the difference.

This franchise is more about our relationship with the concept of control. Not portraying dinosaurs 100% accurately. Heck even the first novel points that out: "Broadly speaking, the ability of the park is to control the spread of life forms. Because the history of evolution is that life escapes all barriers. Life breaks free. Life expands to new territories. Painfully, perhaps even dangerously. But life finds a way." Malcolm shook his head. "I don't mean to be philosophical, but there it is." Notice his use of the words life-forms not dinosaurs. The creators chose dinosaurs because they're menacing relics but bringing them 100% back is virtually impossible. So what do the scientists do? Create new life-forms which look and act similar to what the creatures might have been like. Thats all.

If they were to add feathers to the characters we know already it'd bring up too many questions: how and why did that evolutionary process happen over a mere 14 years? The film makers have chosen to bring back the classic characters from the first film because they want to. As a fan of Jurassic Park I can't complain. That's like if Ridley said he's bringing the original Alien back for Prometheus 2.

The only way to get feathers on dinosaur species is to have a brand new species be cloned by InGen or whoever, or heck, have a whole new movie altogether. But stylistically and by choice the creators are keeping the continuity to bring back the characters who might just have more stories to tell in this forth film.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2014, 04:12:30 PM
You just implied that JW will generate people's interest in dinosaurs and dino science. If anything, that's only going to cause more irritation (to say the least) with inaccurate dinos onscreen.

I also said...

Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 09, 2014, 03:34:40 PM
It's those people who will be dedicated enough to research dinosaurs and discover what they're really like. But that is not the job of JW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 09, 2014, 04:16:54 PM
I think they should focus on making a good movie over an accurate one. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2014, 04:20:50 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jul 09, 2014, 04:16:54 PM
I think they should focus on making a good movie over an accurate one. :P

No reason why accurate cannot equal good. There's also the issue of stagnation. If the franchise doesn't evolve, people will grow tired of it. Jurassic Park has a lot of potential, and that potential ultimately rests with the dinosaurs it puts onscreen and more importantly, how they're portrayed on screen.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 09, 2014, 04:15:34 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2014, 04:12:30 PM
You just implied that JW will generate people's interest in dinosaurs and dino science. If anything, that's only going to cause more irritation (to say the least) with inaccurate dinos onscreen.

I also said...

Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 09, 2014, 03:34:40 PM
It's those people who will be dedicated enough to research dinosaurs and discover what they're really like. But that is not the job of JW.


And when that research and discovery happens, it will still lead to the irritation I spoke of. It may not be JW's job, but it's going to be the catalyst.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jul 09, 2014, 04:23:54 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2014, 04:20:50 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jul 09, 2014, 04:16:54 PM
I think they should focus on making a good movie over an accurate one. :P

No reason why accurate cannot equal good. There's also the issue of stagnation. If the franchise doesn't evolve, people will grow tired of it. Jurassic Park has a lot of potential, and that potential ultimately rests with the dinosaurs it puts onscreen and more importantly, how they're portrayed on screen.
everybody LOVES breaks in visual continuity and feather DLC seems like the WAY TO GO.

face it, you'll buy every 5+ toy that comes out for it anyway.  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 09, 2014, 04:24:55 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2014, 04:20:50 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jul 09, 2014, 04:16:54 PM
I think they should focus on making a good movie over an accurate one. :P

No reason why accurate cannot equal good.

True, but a movie can be accurate and still suck. All the realistic detail in the world couldn't save that Walking with Dinosaurs movie. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 09, 2014, 04:25:21 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2014, 04:20:50 PM
And when that research and discovery happens, it will still lead to the irritation I spoke of.

In some cases of course.

But that's not going to spoil Jurassic World. :-*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2014, 04:29:14 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jul 09, 2014, 04:24:55 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2014, 04:20:50 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jul 09, 2014, 04:16:54 PM
I think they should focus on making a good movie over an accurate one. :P

No reason why accurate cannot equal good.

True, but a movie can be accurate and still suck. All the realistic detail in the world couldn't save that Walking with Dinosaurs movie. :P

Stupid, pointless voiceovers are what killed that movie. Watch the one sans voices and it's really quite a spectacle. Hell, I'd easily rank it as my 2nd favourite dinosaur movie after Prehistoric Beast.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jul 09, 2014, 04:54:12 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 09, 2014, 04:15:34 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 09, 2014, 04:04:24 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 09, 2014, 03:58:14 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 09, 2014, 03:49:17 PM
Featuring a twenty-year-old dromaeosaurid is like if Jurassic Park had featured a tail/stomach dragging Brontosaurus which couldn't survive out of water, just because it's what people were familiar with.

It's nothing like that and you know it.

Please, enlighten us on the difference.

This franchise is more about our relationship with the concept of control. Not portraying dinosaurs 100% accurately. Heck even the first novel points that out: "Broadly speaking, the ability of the park is to control the spread of life forms. Because the history of evolution is that life escapes all barriers. Life breaks free. Life expands to new territories. Painfully, perhaps even dangerously. But life finds a way." Malcolm shook his head. "I don't mean to be philosophical, but there it is." Notice his use of the words life-forms not dinosaurs. The creators chose dinosaurs because they're menacing relics but bringing them 100% back is virtually impossible. So what do the scientists do? Create new life-forms which look and act similar to what the creatures might have been like. Thats all.

That is a remarkably thoughtful way of not answering the question.


Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 09, 2014, 04:15:34 PM
If they were to add feathers to the characters we know already it'd bring up too many questions: how and why did that evolutionary process happen over a mere 14 years?

As you suggest, add a new species. Or a new, more accurate cloning batch. Or (as in the novel) have the naturally-born offspring exhibit different morphology. It doesn't matter, this is what writers are paid for. The plotline isn't pre-ordained by some omnipotent and unquestionable force.


Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 09, 2014, 04:15:34 PM
The film makers have chosen to bring back the classic characters from the first film because they want to. As a fan of Jurassic Park I can't complain. That's like if Ridley said he's bringing the original Alien back for Prometheus 2.

The only way to get feathers on dinosaur species is to have a brand new species be cloned by InGen or whoever, or heck, have a whole new movie altogether. But stylistically and by choice the creators are keeping the continuity to bring back the characters who might just have more stories to tell in this forth film.

I'm sorry, I think I just threw up in my mouth slightly.


Quote from: KiramidHead on Jul 09, 2014, 04:16:54 PM
I think they should focus on making a good movie over an accurate one. :P

The two aren't mutually exclusive... But I get your point, if the movie's terrible then non-bullshit raptors wouldn't do much to elevate it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 09, 2014, 05:02:21 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 09, 2014, 04:54:12 PM
That is a remarkably thoughtful way of not answering the question.

Okay then.

They were never real dinosaurs to begin with.

Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 09, 2014, 04:54:12 PM
As you suggest, add a new species. Or a new, more accurate cloning batch. Or (as in the novel) have the naturally-born offspring exhibit different morphology.

Or use the animals we've seen before and do something new with them.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2014, 05:06:56 PM
Something new like what?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 09, 2014, 05:10:41 PM
Wait a year. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jul 09, 2014, 05:26:25 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 09, 2014, 04:04:24 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 09, 2014, 03:58:14 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 09, 2014, 03:49:17 PM
Featuring a twenty-year-old dromaeosaurid is like if Jurassic Park had featured a tail/stomach dragging Brontosaurus which couldn't survive out of water, just because it's what people were familiar with.

It's nothing like that and you know it.

Please, enlighten us on the difference.
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 09, 2014, 05:02:21 PMOkay then.

They were never real dinosaurs to begin with.

That is still not an answer.

And it's a bullshit, apologist excuse for the question it does answer.


Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 09, 2014, 05:02:21 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 09, 2014, 04:54:12 PM
As you suggest, add a new species. Or a new, more accurate cloning batch. Or (as in the novel) have the naturally-born offspring exhibit different morphology.

Or use the animals we've seen before and do something new with them.

Use new, up-to-date animals to do those new things and you have double the freshness, are educating the public, and live up to the spirit of the original.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2014, 05:40:53 PM
If we really want to be technical, yes, they weren't real dinosaurs because they were bio-engineered creatures. Grant says as much at the beginning of JP 3.

BUT!

These films still shape everyone else's perception of dinosaurs, regardless of whatever the film's internal logic may be. Look at Primal Carnage. Indie game, no continuity to follow, no backstory, whatever, yet the game's dinosaurs look almost identical (!) to the ones in Jurassic Park! That's why portraying dinosaurs accurately is so crucial because other people will be influenced by the most popular property.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jul 09, 2014, 06:06:50 PM
(https://31.media.tumblr.com/b56d1888c5170989e1f438fab6463fd9/tumblr_inline_n5l2arPoX51stuimt.png)
Feathers are srs business
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jul 09, 2014, 06:11:07 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2014, 05:40:53 PM
If we really want to be technical, yes, they weren't real dinosaurs because they were bio-engineered creatures. Grant says as much at the beginning of JP 3.

BUT!

These films still shape everyone else's perception of dinosaurs, regardless of whatever the film's internal logic may be. Look at Primal Carnage. Indie game, no continuity to follow, no backstory, whatever, yet the game's dinosaurs look almost identical (!) to the ones in Jurassic Park! That's why portraying dinosaurs accurately is so crucial because other people will be influenced by the most popular property.
A Voice For Dinos (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0130623/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 09, 2014, 06:17:03 PM
Jurassic Park resolved a lot of 'popular' myths about Dinosaurs (slow, stupid, upright) but introduced in time myths of its own (8-feet tall Velociraptors, frilled Dilophosaurus). Every time I mention Dilophosaurus in a conversation (and that's 0.3% of my yearly conversations) I have to point out that no, we have zero proof that Dilophosaurus had frills, because a good lot of people are convinced that they absolutely did, based on what they saw in Jurassic Park.

Spielberg wanted lifelike animals, and wanted them to feel real and up to date, but that did not stop him from making certain artistic choices when he felt like it. And so he did in the second movie. And so did Johnston in the third. In the same way that we can accept that frilled-Dilophosaurus is just 'speculative', we can also say that the scaly Raptors are due to 'speculative' reasons; who's to say that the feathers were not a characteristic of a certain age span -- and that later in life they shed them and develop scales instead? What if they are an undiscovered species that regressed to a scaly configuration? We can play with that however we want. Point is, we'll never know.

You also have to keep in mind that the Jurassic Park Tyrannosaurus and Velociraptor are some of the most well known movie characters, and their look has become embedded in the public imaginary -- changing the Raptors so radically, in a sequel no less, would influence the film negatively. The filmmakers know that. Were this a remake, or something separate, it would be different. I'll absolutely welcome another Dinosaur movie with up to date Dromeosaurids.

I'm an enormous enthusiast of all things Dinosaurs, and would love to see up to date creatures myself -- but I absolutely understand why they would keep the design very much parallel to its precedent incarnations.



Vertigo forgive me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Jul 09, 2014, 06:51:34 PM
i just want to see things that resemble dinosaurs vs humans
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jul 09, 2014, 07:21:52 PM
If people want the most accurate thing possible, they can read about it in a book or on the internet, you know, do actual research rather than take a Hollywood film's grasp on true paleontology at face value.

I love how in the start of it all they put all this thought and research into making the dinosaurs look like convincingly real living things you can go up and touch, I really do love it. But now looking towards a sequel, the thought of doing something radical like changing the Velociraptor from reptilian skin to feathers for the sake of just being more accurate is, well... what you call being accurate for the better, I call the rape of a movie icon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jul 09, 2014, 07:44:22 PM
Good post, Omega. I did feel similarly to you when Trevorrow dropped his "no feathers" tweet forever ago, but it's stirred up some very different feelings to actually see the result. Possibly because my recently car crash-buggered neck has been making me so irascible that I'd triple-suplex a bunny if it looked at me wrong.
Anyway...

Quote from: Omegazilla on Jul 09, 2014, 06:17:03 PM
Jurassic Park resolved a lot of 'popular' myths about Dinosaurs (slow, stupid, upright) but introduced in time myths of its own (8-feet tall Velociraptors, frilled Dilophosaurus). Every time I mention Dilophosaurus in a conversation (and that's 0.3% of my yearly conversations) I have to point out that no, we have zero proof that Dilophosaurus had frills, because a good lot of people are convinced that they absolutely did, based on what they saw in Jurassic Park.

That's exactly the issue here. Jurassic Park is the avenue through which dinosaur research is disseminated into the public consciousness. A new film in the series has the capability to educate or miseducate 90% of the people who enter the cinema.

In the original film, they made fanciful leaps for the purpose of making the point that fossilised bones don't tell you everything - but that point has now been made, there's a reason they haven't popped Dilophosaurus back in there when everything else has made a reappearance. And as you say, there's now a vast multitude of people who are miseducated about it.

Quote from: Omegazilla on Jul 09, 2014, 06:17:03 PMIn the same way that we can accept that frilled-Dilophosaurus is just 'speculative', we can also say that the scaly Raptors are due to 'speculative' reasons; who's to say that the feathers were not a characteristic of a certain age span -- and that later in life they shed them and develop scales instead? What if they are an undiscovered species that regressed to a scaly configuration? We can play with that however we want. Point is, we'll never know.

That is indeed a reasonable way to justify it (to yourself; I doubt a screenplay would ever go into that much depth). An animal from a feather-bearing line which reached a particularly enormous weight, or lived in scorching conditions and needed a high activity level, would have natural insulation and wouldn't require a feathery covering. Tyrannosaurus is one example of that, and did even go so far as to re-evolve scales.
I don't think either of those would apply to any known dromaeosaurid, though. There's also the matter of its wings: they weren't there for insulation. They evolved either for balance or for covering eggs, both of which they'd always have a need for.


Quote from: Omegazilla on Jul 09, 2014, 06:17:03 PMYou also have to keep in mind that the Jurassic Park Tyrannosaurus and Velociraptor are some of the most well known movie characters, and their look has become embedded in the public imaginary -- changing the Raptors so radically, in a sequel no less, would influence the film negatively. The filmmakers know that. Were this a remake, or something separate, it would be different. I'll absolutely welcome another Dinosaur movie with up to date Dromeosaurids.

Granted, those raptors were a very cool design. Here's the thing: Jurassic Park is never going anywhere. It's made, we can watch it (and its dinosaur designs) any time we want. But it's a product of its time, and that time's over. Just like adding authentic dromies isn't going to make the film great or terrible, taking out the 'raptors' in favour of something more realistic isn't going to drastically change the impact of the film. It might aggravate some people - just as the current decision has. But it'll be the responsible thing to do, and like I keep saying, it's in the spirit of the original film/book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2014, 07:52:30 PM
Vertigo, check this out. The comments made me laugh so hard :D

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi86.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk93%2FDoomRulz_316%2Fdino_zps01641b3e.png&hash=b03aebe697be7f7f84ef8d05ef4dc9ea02ab757a) (http://s86.photobucket.com/user/DoomRulz_316/media/dino_zps01641b3e.png.html)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 09, 2014, 07:58:59 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2014, 07:52:30 PM
Vertigo, check this out. The comments made me laugh so hard :D

http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k93/DoomRulz_316/dino_zps01641b3e.png~original (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k93/DoomRulz_316/dino_zps01641b3e.png~original)

I can barely read it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jul 09, 2014, 08:00:54 PM
Jebus, it takes a very special person indeed to get Microraptor scaly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2014, 08:09:03 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jul 09, 2014, 07:58:59 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2014, 07:52:30 PM
Vertigo, check this out. The comments made me laugh so hard :D

http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k93/DoomRulz_316/dino_zps01641b3e.png~original (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k93/DoomRulz_316/dino_zps01641b3e.png~original)

I can barely read it.

Crap, can't zoom in?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 09, 2014, 08:12:53 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2014, 08:09:03 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jul 09, 2014, 07:58:59 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2014, 07:52:30 PM
Vertigo, check this out. The comments made me laugh so hard :D

http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k93/DoomRulz_316/dino_zps01641b3e.png~original (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k93/DoomRulz_316/dino_zps01641b3e.png~original)

I can barely read it.

Crap, can't zoom in?

I can zoom the browser in, but it's still blurry as hell. I ended up just finding the Facebook page myself and reading it there. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2014, 08:14:10 PM
Ah OK, sorry about that. I don't know how to hotlink the picture in its original res >:(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 09, 2014, 10:17:43 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jul 09, 2014, 06:17:03 PM
Jurassic Park resolved a lot of 'popular' myths about Dinosaurs (slow, stupid, upright) but introduced in time myths of its own (8-feet tall Velociraptors, frilled Dilophosaurus). Every time I mention Dilophosaurus in a conversation (and that's 0.3% of my yearly conversations) I have to point out that no, we have zero proof that Dilophosaurus had frills, because a good lot of people are convinced that they absolutely did, based on what they saw in Jurassic Park.

Spielberg wanted lifelike animals, and wanted them to feel real and up to date, but that did not stop him from making certain artistic choices when he felt like it. And so he did in the second movie. And so did Johnston in the third. In the same way that we can accept that frilled-Dilophosaurus is just 'speculative', we can also say that the scaly Raptors are due to 'speculative' reasons; who's to say that the feathers were not a characteristic of a certain age span -- and that later in life they shed them and develop scales instead? What if they are an undiscovered species that regressed to a scaly configuration? We can play with that however we want. Point is, we'll never know.

You also have to keep in mind that the Jurassic Park Tyrannosaurus and Velociraptor are some of the most well known movie characters, and their look has become embedded in the public imaginary -- changing the Raptors so radically, in a sequel no less, would influence the film negatively. The filmmakers know that. Were this a remake, or something separate, it would be different. I'll absolutely welcome another Dinosaur movie with up to date Dromeosaurids.

I'm an enormous enthusiast of all things Dinosaurs, and would love to see up to date creatures myself -- but I absolutely understand why they would keep the design very much parallel to its precedent incarnations.

Totally agree.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 10, 2014, 01:05:17 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 09, 2014, 08:00:54 PM
Jebus, it takes a very special person indeed to get Microraptor scaly.

John Sibbick? lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 13, 2014, 08:03:03 PM
I just watched Rise of the Planet of the Apes for the first time. Yes, my faith in JW has been restored. That was a really well-done film!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jul 14, 2014, 02:41:28 AM
The list of "almost" every single dinosaur in Jurassic World

Spoiler
Missing from this are the Velociraptors and the new Diabolus Rex... probably because they are too dangerous to be seen by regular park visitors. Not part of the tour, then. and OH SHIT, SON! BARYONIX!  One of my faves. ;D 8) :laugh: Brachiosaurus doesnt appear to be back. :'(

Baryonix, Dimorphodon and music by Michael Giacchino (lol) were all present in the PS1 Lost World videogame... so that game influenced the new film? eh! X)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BsaBzYQCUAArdbf.jpg)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Jul 14, 2014, 02:47:45 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Jul 14, 2014, 02:41:28 AM
The list of "almost" every single dinosaur in Jurassic World

Spoiler
Missing from this are the Velociraptors and the new Diabolus Rex... probably because they are too dangerous to be seen by regular park visitors. Not part of the tour, then. and OH SHIT, SON! BARYONIX!  One of my faves. ;D 8) :laugh: Brachiosaurus doesnt appear to be back. :'(

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BsaBzYQCUAArdbf.jpg)
[close]

"We have a T-Rex!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Jul 14, 2014, 02:53:17 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Jul 14, 2014, 02:41:28 AM
The list of "almost" every single dinosaur in Jurassic World

Spoiler
Missing from this are the Velociraptors and the new Diabolus Rex... probably because they are too dangerous to be seen by regular park visitors. Not part of the tour, then. and OH SHIT, SON! BARYONIX!  One of my faves. ;D 8) :laugh: Brachiosaurus doesnt appear to be back. :'(

Baryonix, Dimorphodon and music by Michael Giacchino (lol) were all present in the PS1 Lost World videogame... so that game influenced the new film? eh! X)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BsaBzYQCUAArdbf.jpg)
[close]

That list, all dem lesser known dinos, it's beautiful. :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 14, 2014, 02:55:25 AM
No Dilo.  >:(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 14, 2014, 02:56:09 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jul 14, 2014, 02:55:25 AM
No Dilo.  >:(

DUDE!!!! SPOILER TAGS!!!!! :'(

...and that little tidbit really, really blows.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 14, 2014, 02:57:41 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 14, 2014, 02:56:09 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jul 14, 2014, 02:55:25 AM
No Dilo.  >:(

DUDE!!!! SPOILER TAGS!!!!! :'(

Alien³?  ;D

Quote...and that little tidbit really, really blows.

Yep. :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jul 14, 2014, 03:00:09 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Jul 14, 2014, 02:41:28 AM
The list of "almost" every single dinosaur in Jurassic World

Spoiler
Missing from this are the Velociraptors and the new Diabolus Rex... probably because they are too dangerous to be seen by regular park visitors. Not part of the tour, then. and OH SHIT, SON! BARYONIX!  One of my faves. ;D 8) :laugh: Brachiosaurus doesnt appear to be back. :'(

Baryonix, Dimorphodon and music by Michael Giacchino (lol) were all present in the PS1 Lost World videogame... so that game influenced the new film? eh! X)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BsaBzYQCUAArdbf.jpg)
[close]

Best part is I'm pretty sure most, if not all of those have been mentioned before in the series. (Including books in this statement)

Staying true to the other movies and books. I like.

Spoiler
As for the Baryonyx, it was mentioned in Jurassic Park 3 by the para-glider guy as being on InGen's list along with Suchomimus after Alan asked him what he thought the Spinosaurus was, so it wasn't just the game that influenced it being in I would guess.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jul 14, 2014, 05:37:22 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 14, 2014, 02:56:09 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jul 14, 2014, 02:55:25 AM
No Dilo.  >:(

DUDE!!!! SPOILER TAGS!!!!! :'(

...and that little tidbit really, really blows.

I agree about the spoiler tags. I know at least I won't be that disappointed when they don't show up, but I still wanted to go in not knowing what dinos are in or not  :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: coolbreeze on Jul 14, 2014, 06:27:45 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jul 14, 2014, 02:55:25 AM
No Dilo.  >:(

That's disappointing. Although it's one less thing for Doom to complain about. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 14, 2014, 08:57:37 AM
Spoiler
No Dilophosaurus, no Brachiosaurus, no Compsognathus. Damn.

Yay for Suchomimus though. :)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jul 14, 2014, 09:29:23 AM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Jul 14, 2014, 03:00:09 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Jul 14, 2014, 02:41:28 AM
The list of "almost" every single dinosaur in Jurassic World

Spoiler
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BsaBzYQCUAArdbf.jpg)
[close]

Best part is I'm pretty sure most, if not all of those have been mentioned before in the series. (Including books in this statement)

Spoiler
Baryonyx, Metriacanthosaurus, Stegosaurus and Pteranodon were all on InGen's original list. The first two were marked on the tour map, but probably weren't in their enclosures for some reason. Stegosaurus is listed on the embryo storage cannister, and Pteranodon is inferred from an advert while they're having dinner.

Ankylosaurus and Pachycephalosaurus weren't originally on Nublar, but are seen on Sorna in the later films.

Apatosaurus is in the books. Depending on who you ask, there may be hints of it in the films too.
Edmontosaurus is new to the series, but is very similar to Maiasaura which is in the books. It also explains a mystery hadrosaur head in The Lost World's rex nest.
Microceratus is new, but is very similar to Leptoceratops, which is in an early Lost World draft (and behaviourally were inspired by the first book's Othnielia).
Suchomimus is new too, but the comment in JP3 about Spinosaurus having a "Suchomimus snout" caused some confusion. I guess this is intended to clear that up.

Mosasaurus is new, obviously, unless you count the game (though I think that's supposed to be Tylosaurus).
Dimorphodon is wholly new, and a very cool addition in my opinion.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 14, 2014, 09:47:53 AM
Quote from: coolbreeze on Jul 14, 2014, 06:27:45 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jul 14, 2014, 02:55:25 AM
No Dilo.  >:(

That's disappointing. Although it's one less thing for Doom to complain about. :laugh:
Oh go away lol >_<
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 14, 2014, 04:50:06 PM
Funny how no one screamed spoilers at FB. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Jul 14, 2014, 05:00:26 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 14, 2014, 09:29:23 AM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Jul 14, 2014, 03:00:09 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Jul 14, 2014, 02:41:28 AM
The list of "almost" every single dinosaur in Jurassic World

Spoiler
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BsaBzYQCUAArdbf.jpg)
[close]

Best part is I'm pretty sure most, if not all of those have been mentioned before in the series. (Including books in this statement)

Spoiler
Baryonyx, Metriacanthosaurus, Stegosaurus and Pteranodon were all on InGen's original list. The first two were marked on the tour map, but probably weren't in their enclosures for some reason. Stegosaurus is listed on the embryo storage cannister, and Pteranodon is inferred from an advert while they're having dinner.

Ankylosaurus and Pachycephalosaurus weren't originally on Nublar, but are seen on Sorna in the later films.

Apatosaurus is in the books. Depending on who you ask, there may be hints of it in the films too.
Edmontosaurus is new to the series, but is very similar to Maiasaura which is in the books. It also explains a mystery hadrosaur head in The Lost World's rex nest.
Microceratus is new, but is very similar to Leptoceratops, which is in an early Lost World draft (and behaviourally were inspired by the first book's Othnielia).
Suchomimus is new too, but the comment in JP3 about Spinosaurus having a "Suchomimus snout" caused some confusion. I guess this is intended to clear that up.

Mosasaurus is new, obviously, unless you count the game (though I think that's supposed to be Tylosaurus).
Dimorphodon is wholly new, and a very cool addition in my opinion.
[close]

Spoiler
I assumed it was Edmontosaurus we saw in Jurassic Park 3, when they were running from the raptors early on. They also appeared in Operation Genesis, so it's not a completely new addition to the series. Reading the wiki, it doesn't mention anything about it being in the stampede scene, but apparently embryos of it are seen in the lab.

The Jurassic Park wiki says that Microceratus was in the novel. I can't remember if this is true or not though, it's been a while since I read the books.

And yeah it was a Tylosaurus in the game, not Mosasaurus.
And Dimorphodon was in the Lost World PSX game, so again it's not completely new to the series.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jul 14, 2014, 05:08:09 PM
I want...

Spoiler
Baryonix to look like this concept from the Lost World PS1 game.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages1.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20111210005438%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2Fd%2Fd6%2FBarionixconcepto.jpg&hash=ce6347578e29f5226043cfdb30bfe83b1a04c091)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 14, 2014, 05:22:31 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jul 14, 2014, 04:50:06 PM
Funny how no one screamed spoilers at FB. :P

No spoiler tags on FB ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 14, 2014, 05:56:21 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 14, 2014, 05:22:31 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jul 14, 2014, 04:50:06 PM
Funny how no one screamed spoilers at FB. :P

No spoiler tags on FB ;)

I meant First Blood for his reply to Blacklabel. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 15, 2014, 05:05:56 PM
By this time next year you guys will know everything about Jurassic Park 17.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jul 15, 2014, 05:43:44 PM
Quote from: KNIGHT on Jul 14, 2014, 05:00:26 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 14, 2014, 09:29:23 AM
Spoiler
Baryonyx, Metriacanthosaurus, Stegosaurus and Pteranodon were all on InGen's original list. The first two were marked on the tour map, but probably weren't in their enclosures for some reason. Stegosaurus is listed on the embryo storage cannister, and Pteranodon is inferred from an advert while they're having dinner.

Ankylosaurus and Pachycephalosaurus weren't originally on Nublar, but are seen on Sorna in the later films.

Apatosaurus is in the books. Depending on who you ask, there may be hints of it in the films too.
Edmontosaurus is new to the series, but is very similar to Maiasaura which is in the books. It also explains a mystery hadrosaur head in The Lost World's rex nest.
Microceratus is new, but is very similar to Leptoceratops, which is in an early Lost World draft (and behaviourally were inspired by the first book's Othnielia).
Suchomimus is new too, but the comment in JP3 about Spinosaurus having a "Suchomimus snout" caused some confusion. I guess this is intended to clear that up.

Mosasaurus is new, obviously, unless you count the game (though I think that's supposed to be Tylosaurus).
Dimorphodon is wholly new, and a very cool addition in my opinion.
[close]

Spoiler
I assumed it was Edmontosaurus we saw in Jurassic Park 3, when they were running from the raptors early on. They also appeared in Operation Genesis, so it's not a completely new addition to the series. Reading the wiki, it doesn't mention anything about it being in the stampede scene, but apparently embryos of it are seen in the lab.

The Jurassic Park wiki says that Microceratus was in the novel. I can't remember if this is true or not though, it's been a while since I read the books.

And yeah it was a Tylosaurus in the game, not Mosasaurus.
And Dimorphodon was in the Lost World PSX game, so again it's not completely new to the series.
[close]

JW dinosaur discussion
If I remember rightly, it's Corythosaurus and Parasaurolophus in JP3's stampede. You'll immediately tell Edmontosaurus apart because it's the only hadrosaur in the series without a sexy head crest.
There's some uncertainty about the embalmed dino foetus, some people think it might be a sauropod. I've just found the prop on Google image search, it does look more like a hadrosaur to me.

Just looked up Microceratus online too, and realised why it's new to me - my version of Jurassic Park uses 'Callovosaurus' (a small ornithopod) instead of 'Microceratops'. So yup, that one's in the books.

Interesting that they're looking to the games for species, with Dimorphodon (which must be the only place it's appeared in the series - it's an odd animal to just pull out of nowhere). Makes you wonder if they are going to take the Telltale JP game as canon afterall.
[close]



Anyway, might be interesting to list the species that don't seem to have made the cut.
Spoiler

-Brachiosaurus
-Dilophosaurus
-Corythosaurus
-Mamenchisaurus
-Ceratosaurus
-Spinosaurus
-Compsognathus (which was one of Nublar's 15 species, along with Sorna obviously)
-Segisaurus (JP1 unseen species, listed on tour map and embryo cannister. Tiny coelophysoid, would have looked similar to the compies)
-Proceratosaurus (unseen species on Isla Nublar. Dog-sized pursuit predator, a very early tyrannosauroid)
-Herrerasaurus (another unseen Nublar species, this one definitely wasn't in its enclosure during the film. One of the earliest dinosaurs, tiger-sized and pretty damn lethal)

And Velociraptor isn't on the list, but we know it's in the film. Maybe it's not on display on account of looking bullshit.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jul 15, 2014, 06:04:03 PM
^

If Trevorrow is as much of a video game geek as he seems (He did play through some of the old NES Jurassic Park games for research lol), i dont think he'll go out of his way to contradict the Telltale game. There might be a reference, even.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Elliott on Jul 15, 2014, 07:42:09 PM
Well, even though the list states no velociraptors they are still in the movie.

This was posted onto twitter and confirmed to be from the movie;
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fschmoesknow.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F07%2FJurassic-World-Raptor.jpg&hash=7be2ca54c28e09c725e87db046a133c3feb2e796)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jul 15, 2014, 07:51:45 PM
This will be such a strange film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jul 15, 2014, 09:44:01 PM
As cool as that list is, I doubt we'll be seeing all of those dinos in the film. It's just a tourist brochure. And some of them won't get more than a few seconds of screen time.

Spoiler
I really, really want to see Baryonix or Suchomimus.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 15, 2014, 09:47:00 PM
Spoiler
SUCHOMIMUS MUST BE IN THE MOVIE.

Or Universal dies. All of it.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jul 15, 2014, 10:25:53 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Jul 15, 2014, 09:44:01 PM
As cool as that list is, I doubt we'll be seeing all of those dinos in the film. It's just a tourist brochure. And some of them won't get more than a few seconds of screen time.

Spoiler
I really, really want to see Baryonix or Suchomimus.
[close]

Agreed with all that. Though it's a bit weird that both of them are on the list, come to think of it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Jul 15, 2014, 10:27:44 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jul 15, 2014, 09:47:00 PM
Spoiler
SUCHOMIMUS MUST BE IN THE MOVIE.

Or Universal dies. All of it.
[close]

QFT
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jul 21, 2014, 06:08:12 PM
https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/491278110851997696

Official Jurassic World promo poster. Will be sold at Comic Con this year. Limited run, apparently.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BtFe1oCCMAAhHGo.jpg)

Decent.  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 21, 2014, 07:04:03 PM
Love it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Jul 21, 2014, 07:21:18 PM
Great piece. The old busted up truck is what I love most about it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Jul 21, 2014, 07:23:36 PM
It looks great. :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 21, 2014, 07:25:27 PM
Quote from: Albus on Jul 21, 2014, 07:23:36 PM
It looks great. :(

:)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Jul 21, 2014, 07:31:35 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jul 21, 2014, 07:25:27 PM
Quote from: Albus on Jul 21, 2014, 07:23:36 PM
It looks great. :(

:)

:o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 21, 2014, 09:09:02 PM
inb4 Doomrulz "y u no put feathers on raptur"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 21, 2014, 09:15:17 PM
Fantastic poster.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jul 21, 2014, 11:17:29 PM
HQ

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg15.hostingpics.net%2Fpics%2F187025jp4pr1.jpg&hash=0ed52f6583c9b534c35494170e96e757df88251a)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 21, 2014, 11:57:21 PM
*Drools*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 22, 2014, 12:32:16 AM
It's even got missing the tire... damn, Patel Corps must really hate cleaning up old junk. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Jul 22, 2014, 12:36:07 AM
It would be cute if they did a poster with the shaving cream bottle. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 22, 2014, 12:37:29 AM
Or the Triceratops poo. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Jul 22, 2014, 01:38:19 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Jul 21, 2014, 11:17:29 PM
HQ

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg15.hostingpics.net%2Fpics%2F187025jp4pr1.jpg&hash=0ed52f6583c9b534c35494170e96e757df88251a)

It's beautiful. :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jul 22, 2014, 01:42:26 AM
For whatever reason didn't notice the eggs till just now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 22, 2014, 01:43:58 AM
And I'm just noticing the pyramid... thing... in the background.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Jul 22, 2014, 01:46:31 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Jul 22, 2014, 01:42:26 AM
For whatever reason didn't notice the eggs till just now.

Same here.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jul 22, 2014, 01:48:01 AM
There's also the monorail in the back. It showed up in this leaked concept pic:

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww2.pictures.zimbio.com%2Fmp%2FY0ev9Y3NycSl.jpg&hash=23dd245b64a12372315233b3a653be0c0675a425)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jul 22, 2014, 03:51:33 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Jul 22, 2014, 01:48:01 AM
There's also the monorail in the back. It showed up in this leaked concept pic:

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww2.pictures.zimbio.com%2Fmp%2FY0ev9Y3NycSl.jpg&hash=23dd245b64a12372315233b3a653be0c0675a425)
[close]
Still feel so alien to me
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jul 22, 2014, 03:55:26 AM
Looks like the kind of stuff you'd see in Dubai. :P

It looks "modern".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 22, 2014, 11:28:22 AM
Check it out, JP goodness from McDs 8)

http://instagram.com/p/qu6M0llEqf/ (http://instagram.com/p/qu6M0llEqf/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 23, 2014, 04:59:51 AM
Remember the huge presence at Comic-Con they teased earlier these months?

SPOILERSSS

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.comingsoon.net%2Fgallery%2F120900%2Fhr_Comic-Con_2014_22.jpg&hash=3ecae087231c5e456b67b813c29c7eae9acc476f)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jul 23, 2014, 05:03:35 AM
Link broken.... for those that cant see it.. it's a T-Rex head...

there are t-rex's in this film.. ZOMG SPOILERS!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jul 23, 2014, 05:29:50 AM
WOW

MUCH SPOILERS
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 23, 2014, 05:32:33 AM
I'm calling it now:

Spoiler
The Diabolus rex makes the T rex its bitch within the first hour, to prove its badassery. :P
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jul 23, 2014, 05:36:04 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jul 23, 2014, 05:32:33 AM
I'm calling it now:

Spoiler
The Diabolus rex makes the T rex its bitch within the first hour, to prove its badassery. :P
[close]

That'd better not f**king happen. That happens, I'm leaving the goddamn theater. T.Rex needs it's comeback.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Jul 23, 2014, 05:40:58 AM
If that happens i'll be happy and feed on fanboy tears.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jul 23, 2014, 05:42:50 AM
If that happens... I'd sit and see where the rest of the movie goes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jul 23, 2014, 05:45:08 AM
Knew that was gonna get some kind of snarky remark.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 23, 2014, 05:45:35 AM
Oh, I'm sure the regular Rexes will get shit to do. We just need to establish the new dino as a genuine threat.

Spoiler
The best solution is to only kill one Rex, and have the others serve as threats in their own right throughout the rest of the film, with Diabolus being the bigger threat lurking in the background.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Jul 23, 2014, 05:46:31 AM
I really wouldn't care since if that happens the Diabolus Rex would basically just be a bigger T-Rex running around. :P

Spoiler
Now make it breathe fire.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 23, 2014, 05:49:18 AM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Jul 23, 2014, 05:46:31 AM
I really wouldn't care since if that happens the Diabolus Rex would basically just be a bigger T-Rex running around. :P

Spoiler
Now make it breathe fire.
[close]

Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages1.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20130429073108%2Fmarvelmovies%2Fimages%2Fthumb%2F1%2F1d%2FAldrich_killian.png%2F185px-Aldrich_killian.png&hash=95fac5fc08dcb9ad78701818dbea3fcf214b331b)
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Jul 23, 2014, 05:57:05 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jul 23, 2014, 05:49:18 AM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Jul 23, 2014, 05:46:31 AM
I really wouldn't care since if that happens the Diabolus Rex would basically just be a bigger T-Rex running around. :P

Spoiler
Now make it breathe fire.
[close]

Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages1.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20130429073108%2Fmarvelmovies%2Fimages%2Fthumb%2F1%2F1d%2FAldrich_killian.png%2F185px-Aldrich_killian.png&hash=95fac5fc08dcb9ad78701818dbea3fcf214b331b)
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]

Spoiler
;D ;D ;D

Yes, yes, we need more butthurt Aspie
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jul 23, 2014, 05:59:53 AM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Jul 23, 2014, 05:46:31 AM
I really wouldn't care since if that happens the Diabolus Rex would basically just be a bigger T-Rex running around. :P

Spoiler
Now make it breathe fire.
[close]
Spoiler

I thought Diabolus was smaller than the average Rex. That may have just been that awesome concept art that one of the members on here did.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 23, 2014, 06:03:16 AM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Jul 23, 2014, 05:59:53 AM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Jul 23, 2014, 05:46:31 AM
I really wouldn't care since if that happens the Diabolus Rex would basically just be a bigger T-Rex running around. :P

Spoiler
Now make it breathe fire.
[close]
Spoiler

I thought Diabolus was smaller than the average Rex. That may have just been that awesome concept art that one of the members on here did.
[close]


Spoiler
No matter the size, it has dat stealth camouflage. 8)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jul 23, 2014, 06:06:24 AM
Spoiler
I more wanna see them duke it out at several stages in the movie and then as Diabolus is about to kill our heroes at the end, T.Rex comes in and saves the day like in the original. That classic theme plays and T.Rex lets out a triumphant roar.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 23, 2014, 06:07:26 AM
Spoiler
I'd like to see it come very, very close to dying, so close it f**king collapses after the battle like Godzilla did in the new movie.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jul 23, 2014, 06:08:53 AM
Spoiler
As long is T.Rex wins, I wouldn't mind that.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 23, 2014, 06:11:02 AM
Spoiler
And as it gets up and stumbles off, Pratt can proclaim that there's a little T. rex in all of us. :laugh:
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jul 23, 2014, 06:13:52 AM
Spoiler
As.
Spoiler
Long.
Spoiler
As.
Spoiler
T.Rex.
Spoiler
Wins.
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 23, 2014, 06:16:30 AM
Spoiler
How about the T. rex and Diabolus put aside their difference and become lovers? :P :laugh: ;D
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jul 23, 2014, 06:22:43 AM
Spoiler
As long as one of them is a chick or they are both chicks.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 23, 2014, 06:23:50 AM
Okay, I'm done f**king with you. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jul 23, 2014, 06:25:00 AM
I knew I'd out-weird you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 23, 2014, 06:26:32 AM
On a more serious note, I wouldn't mind seeing aspects of the book's ending.

Spoiler
Like the island getting the f**king napalmed into the stone age
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jul 23, 2014, 08:05:03 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jul 23, 2014, 06:16:30 AM
Spoiler
How about the T. rex and Diabolus put aside their difference and become lovers? :P :laugh: ;D
[close]
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.gyazo.com%2Fe4940ea851c5fe8ca8c7e26ea413e92f.png&hash=a8d0cb1d43f1492be7e0e35dbed693538d0f1c3d)

Quote from: Dovahkiin on Jul 23, 2014, 06:22:43 AM
Spoiler
As long as one of them is a chick or they are both chicks.
[close]
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.gyazo.com%2Ff72aaf0454caec704784fc7c2bf65b29.png&hash=706c73bb3d672eb9f08c775a7f8dd4f488d2ae1b)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Jul 23, 2014, 10:52:29 AM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Jul 23, 2014, 06:22:43 AM
As long as one of them is a chick or they are both chicks.

They can change their sex, baby. They can be whatever they want. :-*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jul 23, 2014, 11:02:51 AM
This is true.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Jul 23, 2014, 08:32:11 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jul 23, 2014, 06:16:30 AM
Spoiler
How about the T. rex and Diabolus put aside their difference and become lovers? :P :laugh: ;D
[close]
Spoiler
I wouldn't mind it starting like that. First the Rex sees it as a potential mate but then "smells/senses" the other dino DNA in it and they proceed to duke it out.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jul 23, 2014, 08:54:17 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Jul 23, 2014, 10:52:29 AM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Jul 23, 2014, 06:22:43 AM
As long as one of them is a chick or they are both chicks.

They can change their sex, baby. They can be whatever they want. :-*

unf FB stahp. I'm at work.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 23, 2014, 08:57:28 PM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Jul 23, 2014, 08:54:17 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Jul 23, 2014, 10:52:29 AM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Jul 23, 2014, 06:22:43 AM
As long as one of them is a chick or they are both chicks.

They can change their sex, baby. They can be whatever they want. :-*

unf FB stahp. I'm at work.

"Tyrannosaurus, bend over so Diabolus can see your asshole."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Jul 23, 2014, 10:29:20 PM
Diabolus sounds like a hentai villain name. 'Cept it would be Diaborusu. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jul 24, 2014, 06:12:55 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jul 23, 2014, 08:57:28 PM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Jul 23, 2014, 08:54:17 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Jul 23, 2014, 10:52:29 AM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Jul 23, 2014, 06:22:43 AM
As long as one of them is a chick or they are both chicks.

They can change their sex, baby. They can be whatever they want. :-*

unf FB stahp. I'm at work.

"Tyrannosaurus, bend over so Diabolus can see your asshole."
Should be the other way around, as in:

"Tyrannosaurus, don't just stare at it, eat it."
"...T-rex doesn't want to be fed, he wants to hunt!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jul 24, 2014, 06:36:02 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Jul 24, 2014, 06:12:55 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jul 23, 2014, 08:57:28 PM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Jul 23, 2014, 08:54:17 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Jul 23, 2014, 10:52:29 AM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Jul 23, 2014, 06:22:43 AM
As long as one of them is a chick or they are both chicks.

They can change their sex, baby. They can be whatever they want. :-*

unf FB stahp. I'm at work.

"Tyrannosaurus, bend over so Diabolus can see your asshole."
Should be the other way around, as in:

"Tyrannosaurus, don't just stare at it, eat it."
"...T-rex doesn't want to be fed, he wants to hunt!"

I'm legitimately laughing right now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jul 24, 2014, 02:45:12 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnbpVh4gjuI#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnbpVh4gjuI#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jul 24, 2014, 02:54:48 PM
That's my game...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 24, 2014, 06:59:20 PM
(https://31.media.tumblr.com/4b0a6b5089d97534e20c389dd367886e/tumblr_n7zp3ixlHS1s2wio8o1_500.gif)



Just to remind you the flabbergasting talent put into these animatronics.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jul 25, 2014, 01:48:39 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jul 24, 2014, 06:59:20 PM
(https://31.media.tumblr.com/4b0a6b5089d97534e20c389dd367886e/tumblr_n7zp3ixlHS1s2wio8o1_500.gif)



Just to remind you the flabbergasting talent put into these animatronics.

That right eye really zeros in on the camera doesn't it? Fantastic. A symphony of masterfully choreographed robotics, artistic design, and lighting.

And that little eye twitch before it roars.  :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jul 25, 2014, 01:51:35 AM
Looks so damn good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jul 25, 2014, 01:57:28 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jul 24, 2014, 06:59:20 PM
(https://31.media.tumblr.com/4b0a6b5089d97534e20c389dd367886e/tumblr_n7zp3ixlHS1s2wio8o1_500.gif)



Just to remind you the flabbergasting talent put into these animatronics.
lol that looks so fake

the new CGI looks so much better
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kimarhi on Jul 25, 2014, 02:05:19 AM
u cray
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Jul 25, 2014, 02:17:33 AM
SO MUCH BETTER KIMA
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Jul 25, 2014, 02:17:55 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Jul 25, 2014, 01:57:28 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jul 24, 2014, 06:59:20 PM
(https://31.media.tumblr.com/4b0a6b5089d97534e20c389dd367886e/tumblr_n7zp3ixlHS1s2wio8o1_500.gif)



Just to remind you the flabbergasting talent put into these animatronics.
lol that looks so fake

the new CGI looks so much better
Cvalda
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-DFZIZHL3HwA%2FUi2sDmfgaTI%2FAAAAAAAADnM%2FAFd_SJTODDE%2Fs400%2Ftumblr_msr4fhzGRc1qziejgo1_400.gif&hash=153f6a768fcae9c90eb0dc891ca4df34b4f16afa)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Jul 25, 2014, 03:12:27 AM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Jul 25, 2014, 01:48:39 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jul 24, 2014, 06:59:20 PM
(https://31.media.tumblr.com/4b0a6b5089d97534e20c389dd367886e/tumblr_n7zp3ixlHS1s2wio8o1_500.gif)



Just to remind you the flabbergasting talent put into these animatronics.

That right eye really zeros in on the camera doesn't it? Fantastic. A symphony of masterfully choreographed robotics, artistic design, and lighting.

And that little eye twitch before it roars.  :o

I've seen The Lost World so many times I've probably lost count and never have I ever noticed that eye twitch, holy shit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 25, 2014, 06:54:20 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jul 24, 2014, 06:59:20 PM
(https://31.media.tumblr.com/4b0a6b5089d97534e20c389dd367886e/tumblr_n7zp3ixlHS1s2wio8o1_500.gif)



Just to remind you the flabbergasting talent put into these animatronics.

It's incredible.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jul 25, 2014, 08:45:27 AM
Saw this posted on facebook. Pic of the Jurassic World vehicle.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fscontent-b-iad.xx.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-xfp1%2Fv%2Ft1.0-9%2F10580176_767114390000113_6059931168196537611_n.jpg%3Foh%3D0f633f4521ec2eddee8215f64fbee53d%26amp%3Boe%3D5448C921&hash=4b2614b768027a3d640c2851b2a39b261dc9d481)

It's a part of some sort of contest.
QuoteText JURASSIC to 834567 & look for the new ‪#‎JurassicWorld‬ Mercedes-Benz USA 6x6 on the streets of San Diego Comic-Con International for a chance to win an exclusive poster from Mark Englert! ‪#‎SDCC
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 25, 2014, 08:49:22 AM
Mercedes, hell yes.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2F9%2F92%2FMercedes-w163-the-lost-world.jpg&hash=5d379a0d5e972b53c6335c5aa4185cb4e99c9b9b)


This was, like, one of the most badass cars ever.

Before the Rexes got to it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jul 25, 2014, 09:14:07 AM
From what I understand, the Jurassic World vehicle is a 6x6 variant of the Mercedes-Benz G-wagen, and even the 4 wheel version is known for it's legendary off-road capacity.

From Mercedes Benz Canada.
QuoteMother Nature fears the G-Class, and for good reason. There's not much she can do to slow it down. Its shape is perfect for getting around obstacles and through inclement weather, and its body construction is based on a ladder-type frame as opposed to a more traditional unibody frame, giving it more structural integrity for really tough terrain. It even features frame brackets to protect the major assemblies, the fuel tank and the exhaust system.

I wouldn't mind a 6x6 one for myself.  :laugh:




I also like those Jurassic World posters, they're not too bad at all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 25, 2014, 04:37:18 PM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Jul 25, 2014, 08:45:27 AM
Saw this posted on facebook. Pic of the Jurassic World vehicle.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fscontent-b-iad.xx.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-xfp1%2Fv%2Ft1.0-9%2F10580176_767114390000113_6059931168196537611_n.jpg%3Foh%3D0f633f4521ec2eddee8215f64fbee53d%26amp%3Boe%3D5448C921&hash=4b2614b768027a3d640c2851b2a39b261dc9d481)

It's a part of some sort of contest.
QuoteText JURASSIC to 834567 & look for the new ‪#‎JurassicWorld‬ Mercedes-Benz USA 6x6 on the streets of San Diego Comic-Con International for a chance to win an exclusive poster from Mark Englert! ‪#‎SDCC
I
Hey, Alien^3, a spoiler!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 25, 2014, 10:03:39 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fx1.fjcdn.com%2Fcomments%2FThat%2Bblackman%2Bbrings%2Bthe%2Bsofa%2Beverywhere%2B_cd6c57628eae48be2e99a744bfc9482e.jpg&hash=dcd3b6338d8b9129cd6e2dfeb161914ac19b2ec0)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Jul 26, 2014, 12:32:05 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 25, 2014, 06:54:20 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jul 24, 2014, 06:59:20 PM
(https://31.media.tumblr.com/4b0a6b5089d97534e20c389dd367886e/tumblr_n7zp3ixlHS1s2wio8o1_500.gif)



Just to remind you the flabbergasting talent put into these animatronics.

It's incredible.

That shot would be CGI these days sadly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 26, 2014, 03:53:36 PM
What I was busy doing last night, JP-related.

http://instagram.com/p/q6rTaelEhO/ (http://instagram.com/p/q6rTaelEhO/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Jul 26, 2014, 10:57:15 PM
What do you guys think of my D-rex fan art?
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth02.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2FPRE%2Fi%2F2014%2F205%2F4%2Fe%2Fmore_diabolus_rex_speculation_by_godzillakuj94-d7s43kk.jpg&hash=cb6865c253c33e329c0ed532a8d698911fa8b042)
[close]
http://godzillakuj94.deviantart.com/art/More-Diabolus-Rex-Speculation-470483732 (http://godzillakuj94.deviantart.com/art/More-Diabolus-Rex-Speculation-470483732)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 26, 2014, 11:05:54 PM
I like the protruding teeth on the lower jaw. Very nice.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Jul 26, 2014, 11:11:18 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jul 26, 2014, 11:05:54 PM
I like the protruding teeth on the lower jaw. Very nice.
Thanks!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 31, 2014, 01:38:43 PM
I have received word from JP toy supplier that the JW toys will include JP 3 repaints. So disappointed. f**k you, Hasbro.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 31, 2014, 01:55:49 PM
The raptors won't be repaints, nor will the humans.

I can imagine them repainting the 2011 line.

Either way it's going to be sweet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 31, 2014, 02:18:34 PM
https://www.profilesinhistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/Hollywood_Auction_31_small.pdf (https://www.profilesinhistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/Hollywood_Auction_31_small.pdf)

Start on page 247. Caution: will cause excessive drooling. Have paper towels handy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 31, 2014, 03:02:47 PM
The Raptor animatronic there is from Jurassic Park III, not The Lost World...

It's also incredibly sad to see some of these up in an auction. Especially that Spinosaurus head -- it was part of the Winston display room aeons ago. And so are many other items in this list. I've never even had the chance to see it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 31, 2014, 03:34:12 PM
They have to make room for the new stuff.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 31, 2014, 07:50:59 PM
By scattering the old stuff across the globe.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Aug 01, 2014, 03:32:07 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bt61MKeIAAA0Mqw.jpg)

New image of the flick. Is that a raptor in the back?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 01, 2014, 06:35:52 AM
Can't see anything that looks like a raptor.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Aug 01, 2014, 06:40:51 AM
Star Lord is in jail... again. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Aug 01, 2014, 10:33:13 AM
Gives a whole new meaning to "don't drop the soap" when your cellmate is (possibly) a raptor.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Aug 01, 2014, 11:00:55 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Aug 01, 2014, 06:40:51 AM
Star Lord is in jail... again. :laugh:
Does that mean we get a talking Raptor in Guardians of the Galaxy 2?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Aug 01, 2014, 11:28:32 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Aug 01, 2014, 11:00:55 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Aug 01, 2014, 06:40:51 AM
Star Lord is in jail... again. :laugh:
Does that mean we get a talking Raptor in Guardians of the Galaxy 2?

ALAN
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Aug 01, 2014, 01:02:00 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Aug 01, 2014, 11:00:55 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Aug 01, 2014, 06:40:51 AM
Star Lord is in jail... again. :laugh:
Does that mean we get a talking Raptor in Guardians of the Galaxy 2?

Officially confirmed. Raptor Planet is part of the MCU.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Aug 01, 2014, 02:35:07 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Aug 01, 2014, 03:32:07 AM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bt61MKeIAAA0Mqw.jpg

New image of the flick. Is that a raptor in the back?

He actually looks like he's part of the movie in that pic. I was worried that he would stick out like a sore thumb, but he looks to be doing a good job. Good on him!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Aug 01, 2014, 04:09:44 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Aug 01, 2014, 06:35:52 AM
Can't see anything that looks like a raptor.

When you see it you'll shit bricks.

Spoiler
MINDf**k
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 01, 2014, 05:23:03 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Aug 01, 2014, 04:09:44 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Aug 01, 2014, 06:35:52 AM
Can't see anything that looks like a raptor.

When you see it you'll shit bricks.

Spoiler
MINDf**k
[close]

There's no raptor.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KNIGHT on Aug 01, 2014, 05:25:43 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Aug 01, 2014, 05:23:03 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Aug 01, 2014, 04:09:44 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Aug 01, 2014, 06:35:52 AM
Can't see anything that looks like a raptor.

When you see it you'll shit bricks.

Spoiler
MINDf**k
[close]

There's no raptor.

Famous last words...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 01, 2014, 05:40:13 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fm.quickmeme.com%2Fimg%2Ffa%2Ffa3e19ffd513583d5f7ae60382262d9a0505d72589cd2374af2b2a7de75e057d.jpg&hash=0f417b37abd42772b4eb86d975280b77e18ff6de)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Aug 01, 2014, 07:07:59 PM
I see it too there's definitely something in the background, looks grey but too big to be raptor. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Aug 01, 2014, 07:33:57 PM
Its the engineer's head from Prometheus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Aug 02, 2014, 10:44:44 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Aug 01, 2014, 03:32:07 AM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bt61MKeIAAA0Mqw.jpg

New image of the flick. Is that a raptor in the back?

Jurassic Park was never this sexy. We should boycott this film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: coolbreeze on Aug 02, 2014, 10:54:20 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Aug 02, 2014, 10:44:44 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Aug 01, 2014, 03:32:07 AM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bt61MKeIAAA0Mqw.jpg

New image of the flick. Is that a raptor in the back?

Jurassic Park was never this sexy. We should boycott this film.

You're the worst kind of human being.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Aug 02, 2014, 11:02:03 PM
#BOYCOTTJURASSICWORLD
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Aug 03, 2014, 09:57:59 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 31, 2014, 02:18:34 PM
https://www.profilesinhistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/Hollywood_Auction_31_small.pdf (https://www.profilesinhistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/Hollywood_Auction_31_small.pdf)

Start on page 247. Caution: will cause excessive drooling. Have paper towels handy.
Time to start dipping into the RSP, Doom.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 03, 2014, 11:30:14 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Aug 03, 2014, 09:57:59 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 31, 2014, 02:18:34 PM
https://www.profilesinhistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/Hollywood_Auction_31_small.pdf (https://www.profilesinhistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/Hollywood_Auction_31_small.pdf)

Start on page 247. Caution: will cause excessive drooling. Have paper towels handy.
Time to start dipping into the RSP, Doom.
Ha! Even those don't have the moolah I would have needed. Between the JP animatronics and the Michael Keaton Batsuit, I was squealing [emoji15]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Aug 05, 2014, 07:40:08 PM
It's a Wrap
It's a trap!

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BuTCn_HCAAECll6.jpg:large)

They are done filming.. now onto post production.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Aug 05, 2014, 07:52:54 PM
I'm calling it.

Trailer will be released around the time the Pacific Rim and Godzilla trailers were released. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Aug 05, 2014, 09:22:08 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Aug 05, 2014, 07:52:54 PM
I'm calling it.

Trailer will be released around the time the Pacific Rim and Godzilla trailers were released. :P

In 2013? ???
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Aug 05, 2014, 09:25:01 PM
I can't wait for the Jurassic Resurrection trailer.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Aug 05, 2014, 09:49:34 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Aug 05, 2014, 07:40:08 PM
It's a Wrap
It's a trap!

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BuTCn_HCAAECll6.jpg:large)

They are done filming.. now onto post production.

Awesome!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Aug 05, 2014, 11:22:08 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Aug 05, 2014, 09:22:08 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Aug 05, 2014, 07:52:54 PM
I'm calling it.

Trailer will be released around the time the Pacific Rim and Godzilla trailers were released. :P

In 2013? ???
...
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fweknowmemes.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F04%2Ffight-me-u-lil-bitch.jpg&hash=39df9f460731663e6f0c4b3bf7dddc1ba1a4fe54)
don't get smart with me shas! :P :laugh:

I meant around November or December. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Aug 05, 2014, 11:30:06 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Aug 05, 2014, 11:22:08 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Aug 05, 2014, 09:22:08 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Aug 05, 2014, 07:52:54 PM
I'm calling it.

Trailer will be released around the time the Pacific Rim and Godzilla trailers were released. :P
In 2013? ???
...
http://weknowmemes.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/fight-me-u-lil-bitch.jpg
don't get smart with me shas! :P :laugh:

I meant around November or December. :P
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FnoLlBIa.gif&hash=94f000844f2e85543e3d235d748659c96bbdf85d)

bring it
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Aug 05, 2014, 11:40:44 PM
Is this real life? Is this just fantasy?

Caught in a landslide... No escape from that dino behind a tree...
Open your eyes... look up to the sky and screammmmmmmmm
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Aug 05, 2014, 11:44:45 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Aug 05, 2014, 11:40:44 PM
Is this real life? Is this just fantasy?

Caught in a landslide... No escape from that dino behind a tree...
Open your eyes... look up to the sky and screammmmmmmmm

I'm just a poor dilo nobody loves me
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Aug 05, 2014, 11:51:16 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Aug 05, 2014, 07:40:08 PM
It's a Wrap
It's a trap!

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BuTCn_HCAAECll6.jpg:large)

They are done filming.. now onto post production.

yusss
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Aug 06, 2014, 09:13:35 PM
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/04/jeff-goldblum_n_5648578.html (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/04/jeff-goldblum_n_5648578.html)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.huffingtonpost.com%2F2014-08-04-Ko551vLImgur.jpg&hash=0b279ff11842a28a9737511d6f27a8debe3a2074)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Aug 07, 2014, 09:48:12 PM
http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/08/07/check-out-these-incredible-unused-jurassic-park-posters (http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/08/07/check-out-these-incredible-unused-jurassic-park-posters)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fassets2.ignimgs.com%2F2014%2F08%2F07%2F3jpg-0d26e5_960w.jpg&hash=a3d3dff0a840010ab596b141772a40f91824c128)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Aug 07, 2014, 09:49:28 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Aug 06, 2014, 09:13:35 PM
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/04/jeff-goldblum_n_5648578.html (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/04/jeff-goldblum_n_5648578.html)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.huffingtonpost.com%2F2014-08-04-Ko551vLImgur.jpg&hash=0b279ff11842a28a9737511d6f27a8debe3a2074)
Must go faster.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Aug 07, 2014, 09:52:15 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F0.media.collegehumor.cvcdn.com%2F35%2F43%2F89854c47bbf346d773f5e0f096bc7391-jurassic-park-kids-scared-by-butts.gif&hash=d03e912befc81f99843c7fc3eee28b03fb5f36a1)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Aug 07, 2014, 09:53:26 PM
Old, but I'll let it slide.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Aug 07, 2014, 09:54:51 PM
What were you gonna do anyway, lil bitch
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Aug 07, 2014, 10:32:39 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Aug 07, 2014, 09:48:12 PM
http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/08/07/check-out-these-incredible-unused-jurassic-park-posters (http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/08/07/check-out-these-incredible-unused-jurassic-park-posters)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fassets2.ignimgs.com%2F2014%2F08%2F07%2F3jpg-0d26e5_960w.jpg&hash=a3d3dff0a840010ab596b141772a40f91824c128)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FBKvFnrk.jpg&hash=ad71184f71b120384a6ab581ce538f0480bc8459)

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F3BO4Uq2.png&hash=5b05ffe9f2bd9367447b392d10504e8f54808f61)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Aug 07, 2014, 10:34:42 PM
Malcolm is really a Terminator.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Aug 07, 2014, 10:36:53 PM
And that rex emerged from the Ark of the Covenant.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Aug 07, 2014, 10:47:23 PM
And Grant has a Frankenstein brow.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 08, 2014, 01:06:24 AM
Quote from: Shasvre on Aug 07, 2014, 10:32:39 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Aug 07, 2014, 09:48:12 PM
http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/08/07/check-out-these-incredible-unused-jurassic-park-posters (http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/08/07/check-out-these-incredible-unused-jurassic-park-posters)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fassets2.ignimgs.com%2F2014%2F08%2F07%2F3jpg-0d26e5_960w.jpg&hash=a3d3dff0a840010ab596b141772a40f91824c128)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FBKvFnrk.jpg&hash=ad71184f71b120384a6ab581ce538f0480bc8459)

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F3BO4Uq2.png&hash=5b05ffe9f2bd9367447b392d10504e8f54808f61)
[close]

I kind of dig this one. Wouldn't mind having it framed on my wall.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Aug 08, 2014, 05:52:40 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Aug 07, 2014, 09:54:51 PM
What were you gonna do anyway, lil bitch
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdata2.whicdn.com%2Fimages%2F103097381%2Fthumb.jpg&hash=43fd6217a5f3bac5d14f641141a03747f5adceb8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Aug 08, 2014, 05:56:31 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ftgem.files.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F07%2Frape-face.jpg&hash=049b0ea56ee7cd5feb9a7d0afbaab7879e339f1a)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Aug 08, 2014, 06:03:15 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fassets2.ignimgs.com%2F2014%2F08%2F07%2Fbw-comp-11jpg-8dde43_960w.jpg&hash=b1a9e3d2c1e2c33381a343569547e47826ef3f25)

God, I f**king love this one. I'd have it framed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 08, 2014, 04:06:41 PM
I like the font but that image, I dunno man...is that an angry giraffe? :P

EDIT: http://truckyeah.jalopnik.com/this-jurassic-park-explorer-is-a-race-car-1618277762/+charliejane (http://truckyeah.jalopnik.com/this-jurassic-park-explorer-is-a-race-car-1618277762/+charliejane)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Aug 09, 2014, 02:39:53 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Aug 08, 2014, 06:03:15 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fassets2.ignimgs.com%2F2014%2F08%2F07%2Fbw-comp-11jpg-8dde43_960w.jpg&hash=b1a9e3d2c1e2c33381a343569547e47826ef3f25)

God, I f**king love this one. I'd have it framed.

Looks like a damn horror movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Aug 09, 2014, 03:43:32 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Aug 07, 2014, 09:52:15 PM
http://0.media.collegehumor.cvcdn.com/35/43/89854c47bbf346d773f5e0f096bc7391-jurassic-park-kids-scared-by-butts.gif

bahahahaha wtfffff!!!

scene tarnished
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Aug 09, 2014, 04:02:21 AM
Not too bad a situation to be in, if you ask me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: genocyber on Aug 09, 2014, 07:45:02 AM
Quote from: MudButt on Aug 09, 2014, 02:39:53 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Aug 08, 2014, 06:03:15 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fassets2.ignimgs.com%2F2014%2F08%2F07%2Fbw-comp-11jpg-8dde43_960w.jpg&hash=b1a9e3d2c1e2c33381a343569547e47826ef3f25)

God, I f**king love this one. I'd have it framed.

Looks like a damn horror movie.
Makes me think of this.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.popcornpictures.co.uk%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F08%2FDNA-1997.jpg&hash=a8985ad3164f0350d17f6d5183003033f54b8e3f)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 09, 2014, 09:30:20 AM
Hey guys just posting an update.

Our August episode is on its way!

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BulDJNuCUAEhtre.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Aug 13, 2014, 04:49:26 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net%2Fhphotos-ak-xpf1%2Ft1.0-9%2F10609433_776246712420214_1010449687637773179_n.jpg&hash=f3bc0324a0ec211d2f0e5b0aa2ca989766b6b017)

I'd like to speculate that judging by this poster there will be none of that feather rubbish with the raptors.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Aug 13, 2014, 04:52:16 PM
Trevorrow said early on that there wouldnt be any feathers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Aug 13, 2014, 04:53:41 PM
Good to know.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Aug 13, 2014, 05:37:31 PM
*grinds teeth*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 13, 2014, 06:22:47 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Aug 13, 2014, 05:37:31 PM
*grinds teeth*

*hugs*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 13, 2014, 08:41:12 PM
 :D

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Aug 18, 2014, 04:34:59 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Aug 09, 2014, 09:30:20 AM
Hey guys just posting an update.

Our August episode is on its way!

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BulDJNuCUAEhtre.jpg

You're missing Colin Trevorrow's pic on there!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 22, 2014, 05:38:07 PM
http://dinologue.com/2014/08/no-feathers-jurassic-world/ (http://dinologue.com/2014/08/no-feathers-jurassic-world/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 23, 2014, 07:47:36 AM
Shows they did they're research when they speculate about what the dinosaur might be on a fan made poster. ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Aug 25, 2014, 01:22:15 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOmJLk1lu08# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOmJLk1lu08#)

Spend a moment with me and walk through the Gates of Jurassic Park, remembering two people who made our imaginations what they are today.

I say a 'Rest in Peace' to not only Richard Attenborough, but also to the man behind the magic of the film, Stan Winston. These two in coordination with many others did something that changed the way we looked at the big screen forever.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Aug 25, 2014, 02:33:31 AM
Hard to believe we've lost Stan, Pete and now Richard in recent years.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Aug 25, 2014, 02:38:47 AM
Crichton too. I'll never forget that day.

Attenborough's passing really did hit me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 25, 2014, 03:10:10 AM
As sad as it is, it doesn't surprise. Rich was in a bad way. But, he will be missed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 25, 2014, 08:00:41 AM
Bob Peck
Michael Crichton
Pete Postlethwaite
Stan Winston
Greg Burson
Jophery C. Brown
Richard Attenborough

Each time a name is added to this list the world feels a little more empty.

Spoiler
But all the more reason to watch JP again!
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 25, 2014, 11:34:29 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Aug 25, 2014, 08:00:41 AM
Jophery C. Brown

I'm guessing this was the guy who opened the raptor cage?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 25, 2014, 03:22:42 PM
Yeah he died in January of this year.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 25, 2014, 04:11:17 PM
Shame. On Rich's death...I guess his funeral will spare no expense.

...too soon...?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master on Aug 25, 2014, 04:18:13 PM
Too soon bro.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cal427eb on Aug 25, 2014, 04:26:16 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Aug 25, 2014, 04:11:17 PM
Shame. On Rich's death...I guess his funeral will spare no expense.

...too soon...?
Had to google that one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: War Wager on Aug 25, 2014, 06:58:22 PM
(https://scontent-a-ams.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfa1/t1.0-9/10577039_755877727781230_4248833359463271203_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Aug 25, 2014, 10:41:12 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Aug 25, 2014, 04:11:17 PM
Shame. On Rich's death...I guess his funeral will spare no expense.

...too soon...?

Mr. DoomRulz, I've decided not to endorse your joke.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 25, 2014, 10:43:06 PM
So have I.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 25, 2014, 10:44:14 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Aug 25, 2014, 10:41:12 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Aug 25, 2014, 04:11:17 PM
Shame. On Rich's death...I guess his funeral will spare no expense.

...too soon...?

Mr. DoomRulz, I've decided not to endorse your joke.
See now here I am, uh, laughing with myself. That's, *that's* chaos theory.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Aug 25, 2014, 10:45:04 PM
I can only imagine the jokes that will pour out when Goldblum eventually bites it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 25, 2014, 10:46:04 PM
It will be chaotic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Aug 25, 2014, 10:53:02 PM
"I'm, uh, yeah, hmmm...yeah, uh having a heart attack, ambulance, uh, must move faster!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Aug 26, 2014, 01:42:23 PM
Hold on to your butts...

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bv6YduDCEAETO37.jpg:large)

https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/504007845587980288/photo/1
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master on Aug 26, 2014, 02:04:28 PM
Yeah that's cool! I hope there will be a great shoot off this statue in film.

Some new Dino pics would also be appreciated (cough cough D Rex cough cough)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Wrecktangle on Sep 01, 2014, 08:17:29 AM
Very keen to see this, Mosasaurus please. Loved these films since childhood. It was unfortunate to hear about Richard. :(

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 10, 2014, 11:25:21 AM
The new episode of our JP podcast drops this friday!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-tAqE8zNFARA%2FVA8UAoASW-I%2FAAAAAAAAAa4%2FTtLDJD-9qPA%2Fs1600%2FREJP.jpg&hash=7ddb9c75ac56654af81896f688fabed1e6dfa1da)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 10, 2014, 11:30:23 AM
Nigel Marven!!! I hope to God you asked about a sequel to Prehistoric Park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 10, 2014, 12:22:40 PM
We did  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 10, 2014, 12:23:54 PM
Awesome! This might be your best podcast yet 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 10, 2014, 01:10:50 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90FVqM6TRvU&feature=youtu.be (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90FVqM6TRvU&feature=youtu.be)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 10, 2014, 01:15:16 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 10, 2014, 01:10:50 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90FVqM6TRvU&feature=youtu.be (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90FVqM6TRvU&feature=youtu.be)

This...I cannot process the awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Sep 17, 2014, 12:56:20 AM
Quote from: War Wager on Aug 25, 2014, 06:58:22 PM
(https://scontent-a-ams.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfa1/t1.0-9/10577039_755877727781230_4248833359463271203_n.jpg)

Beautiful. I've been gone from here for a while but I did hear about sir Richard Attenborough's passing, and he will be missed. RIP.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 20, 2014, 12:13:02 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U18sOypRW8s#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U18sOypRW8s#ws)

This movie, this low-budget Land of the Lost knockoff to be precise, has JW beat in terms of how its dinosaurs look. It's so sad.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Sep 20, 2014, 04:31:47 PM
Feathery tyrannosaurids usually irritate me (I generally see it as a sign of the artist being too invested in the 'new look'), but I've got to say, that is a brave design. I'm sure a lot of people will hate it, but I like it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 20, 2014, 06:11:55 PM
Actually, it's being shared quite a bit on Facebook. I think people will notice. I loved the jab at Alan Grant and not moving, lmao.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Sep 20, 2014, 06:26:03 PM
Yeah, the movie still looks like shit, feathers or no feathers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Sep 20, 2014, 07:57:24 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Sep 20, 2014, 04:31:47 PM
Feathery tyrannosaurids usually irritate me (I generally see it as a sign of the artist being too invested in the 'new look'), but I've got to say, that is a brave design. I'm sure a lot of people will hate it, but I like it.

I just dont like the colours of the feathers. :P I reckon it would look good in all black...

charcoal black.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Sep 20, 2014, 07:58:08 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Sep 20, 2014, 07:57:24 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Sep 20, 2014, 04:31:47 PM
Feathery tyrannosaurids usually irritate me (I generally see it as a sign of the artist being too invested in the 'new look'), but I've got to say, that is a brave design. I'm sure a lot of people will hate it, but I like it.

I just dont like the colours of the feathers. :P I reckon it would look good in all black...

charcoal black.

It's already black.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 21, 2014, 12:28:07 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 20, 2014, 12:13:02 PM
This movie, this low-budget Land of the Lost knockoff to be precise, has JW beat in terms of how its dinosaurs look. It's so sad.

I like that you put "in terms of how the dinosaurs look",

not

"in terms of how scientifically accurate to real life dinosaurs they look."

That means I can say that with 100% confidence that the JW dinosaurs will look a lot better than those.

:-*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 21, 2014, 01:40:20 AM
Except that's exactly what I meant, and since you knew that, your quip is failing harder than the scientific accuracy of JW's dinosaurs :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Sep 21, 2014, 01:50:45 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 20, 2014, 12:13:02 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U18sOypRW8s#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U18sOypRW8s#ws)

This movie, this low-budget Land of the Lost knockoff to be precise, has JW beat in terms of how its dinosaurs look. It's so sad.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1372.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fag335%2FXilinoc%2FEchsinternally_zps2bd733e0.jpg&hash=53138af059201effe6198e416e587b602b3f25a4)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Sep 21, 2014, 08:23:07 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Sep 20, 2014, 07:57:24 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Sep 20, 2014, 04:31:47 PM
Feathery tyrannosaurids usually irritate me (I generally see it as a sign of the artist being too invested in the 'new look'), but I've got to say, that is a brave design. I'm sure a lot of people will hate it, but I like it.

I just dont like the colours of the feathers. :P I reckon it would look good in all black...

charcoal black.

I've thought for quite a while that Jurassic World was missing a trick by not introducing Utahraptor as an all-black shaggy monster. Could be extremely menacing.

We do know it's a colour that non-avian coelurosaurs could produce, too - Microraptor was entirely black.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 21, 2014, 09:28:22 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 21, 2014, 01:40:20 AM
Except that's exactly what I meant, and since you knew that, your quip is failing harder than the scientific accuracy of JW's dinosaurs :)

JW's dinos will still look better. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 21, 2014, 11:38:34 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Sep 21, 2014, 08:23:07 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Sep 20, 2014, 07:57:24 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Sep 20, 2014, 04:31:47 PM
Feathery tyrannosaurids usually irritate me (I generally see it as a sign of the artist being too invested in the 'new look'), but I've got to say, that is a brave design. I'm sure a lot of people will hate it, but I like it.

I just dont like the colours of the feathers. :P I reckon it would look good in all black...

charcoal black.

I've thought for quite a while that Jurassic World was missing a trick by not introducing Utahraptor as an all-black shaggy monster. Could be extremely menacing.

We do know it's a colour that non-avian coelurosaurs could produce, too - Microraptor was entirely black.
All black, really? When was this revealed?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Sep 21, 2014, 01:10:18 PM
2012. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microraptor#Coloration)
It is possible that it may have had other colours on its iridescent sections, but black is the most likely (and its non-glossy feathers were definitely black).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Sep 21, 2014, 05:05:19 PM
We haven't even seen how the JW Dinosaurs are rendered. If they're anything like the first three films, I'm sorry, but they'll blow these ones out of the water.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 21, 2014, 06:23:40 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.quickmeme.com%2Fimg%2F70%2F70f84e85c638547edf88d1ffb1165b61cc0158196bfd6eaead202cb92c4c40ec.jpg&hash=8a8cac5eaeef9cc9d30329eb8833e43c87b909d6)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Sep 22, 2014, 07:57:04 PM
A new tease from Colin Trevorrow. ;D

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FTYaBSoG.jpg&hash=0c5a4eb588e77e45455cd19ea21c72bdc39187c3)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Sep 22, 2014, 07:57:43 PM
Awesome. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Sep 22, 2014, 07:58:00 PM
The hype is real.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Sep 22, 2014, 08:59:46 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Sep 22, 2014, 07:57:04 PM
A new tease from Colin Trevorrow. ;D

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FTYaBSoG.jpg&hash=0c5a4eb588e77e45455cd19ea21c72bdc39187c3)
[close]

Oh shit! :o ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Oct 04, 2014, 06:12:38 PM
Universal Promote Jurassic World at French Film Expo

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1309.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fs625%2Fatacamadesert86%2F10568881_616695975113523_4472714476598003282_n_zps2660fb81.jpg&hash=51774b4959e2f62b7b95e82950912b587a504a4e)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1309.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fs625%2Fatacamadesert86%2F1939578_616722478444206_8725513011995004479_n_zps9ab41aa4.jpg&hash=d8b13c1fa953fb7bba920cae24bebc13d3ed070a)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1309.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fs625%2Fatacamadesert86%2F10177469_616722425110878_3525052844035664936_n_zps5fa57c49.jpg&hash=65c8163057200ef8db361d1c17c688383fd3decc)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1309.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fs625%2Fatacamadesert86%2F10370373_616722355110885_6933051136045495686_n_zps2076efdf.jpg&hash=80de960bfb568515733ec04e341138390fa23d44)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1309.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fs625%2Fatacamadesert86%2F10494873_616756871774100_6387260796136458753_n_zpsa6927c3a.jpg&hash=4ada793166f1701b5adb4f269dba6c4467bcf0be)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1309.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fs625%2Fatacamadesert86%2F10703783_616757858440668_4279371162757152871_n1_zps88b257a5.jpg&hash=2cd0a4488798ada81840388e9e0cbd72490994ee)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1309.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fs625%2Fatacamadesert86%2F10670203_616757881773999_4751127672810888868_n_zps06738597.jpg&hash=541d6b363fba92030f4a61ae23da7e87e83a57d4)

https://www.facebook.com/jurassicworldnewsfrance (https://www.facebook.com/jurassicworldnewsfrance)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Oct 04, 2014, 06:14:17 PM
Is that a new dino reveal? What is it? Where are my dino experts?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Oct 04, 2014, 06:19:25 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Oct 04, 2014, 06:14:17 PM
Is that a new dino reveal? What is it? Where are my dino experts?

I think it's a T-Rex, maybe a redesign
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Oct 04, 2014, 06:20:11 PM
Quote from: Crazy shrimp on Oct 04, 2014, 06:19:25 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Oct 04, 2014, 06:14:17 PM
Is that a new dino reveal? What is it? Where are my dino experts?

I think it's a T-Rex, maybe a redesign

inb4 DoomRulz.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Oct 04, 2014, 06:22:10 PM
I like.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Oct 04, 2014, 08:16:53 PM
Plebs, please, it is most clearly a scientifically inaccurate (to the point in which I want to openly vomit all over my dick) rendering of a Cuckholdisuchoyanchuanodeltacakaromondosaurus Prime. Know your shit, Galaxy, know your shit Trevorrow, know your shit WORLD, I'm out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Oct 04, 2014, 08:31:39 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg3.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20090430165232%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2F5%2F5c%2FJP-TimMurphy.jpg&hash=e104e9388b5490057137de9d6de06b01367a35f2)

"Plebasaurus Rex."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Oct 04, 2014, 08:56:37 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 20, 2014, 12:13:02 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U18sOypRW8s#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U18sOypRW8s#ws)

This movie, this low-budget Land of the Lost knockoff to be precise, has JW beat in terms of how its dinosaurs look. It's so sad.

All the other dinos looked great except the Rex. It's just hard to take it serious with those colors.

Quote from: First Blood on Oct 04, 2014, 08:31:39 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg3.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20090430165232%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2F5%2F5c%2FJP-TimMurphy.jpg&hash=e104e9388b5490057137de9d6de06b01367a35f2)

"Plebasaurus Rex."

Lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Oct 04, 2014, 10:31:53 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Oct 04, 2014, 08:31:39 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg3.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20090430165232%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2F5%2F5c%2FJP-TimMurphy.jpg&hash=e104e9388b5490057137de9d6de06b01367a35f2)

"Plebasaurus Rex."
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.gyazo.com%2Fa73c8abc9dd9d0373e193e1bfd1f7ac0.png&hash=cf6eb24280cc491476028ec37c0dda07750128b6)

"Are those... Aspieating... uh, Aspiesauruses?"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 04, 2014, 10:42:05 PM
"They... they're trolling this way."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Oct 04, 2014, 10:50:08 PM
I love you guys. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Oct 04, 2014, 10:51:22 PM
It's the T-Rex Elder.

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg2.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20100710033333%2Favp%2Fimages%2F5%2F58%2F979_4_large.jpg&hash=e1bd92bcd6fd2c6fd8a5e6248f6367d5da35217c)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Oct 05, 2014, 12:06:59 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Oct 04, 2014, 10:31:53 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Oct 04, 2014, 08:31:39 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg3.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20090430165232%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2F5%2F5c%2FJP-TimMurphy.jpg&hash=e104e9388b5490057137de9d6de06b01367a35f2)

"Plebasaurus Rex."
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.gyazo.com%2Fa73c8abc9dd9d0373e193e1bfd1f7ac0.png&hash=cf6eb24280cc491476028ec37c0dda07750128b6)

"Are those... Aspieating... uh, Aspiesauruses?"
Quote from: Omegazilla on Oct 04, 2014, 10:42:05 PM
"They... they're trolling this way."

"We can make it if we run"
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.tumblr.com%2F1c04beae8f1da4cb3fdbf0556abc9f9f%2Fkqsomoi%2F2nDmu9hv4%2Ftumblr_static_ellie.jpg&hash=1ceeef5e7808c6806e8ca90b85c9b1853422b9ed)

"No, we can't"
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sden.org%2FIMG%2Fjpg%2F1-bob-peck-jurassic-park.jpg&hash=07e0f1ee2144bdb6ee1b68b5fd9a252462ec326d)

"Why not?"
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.tumblr.com%2F1c04beae8f1da4cb3fdbf0556abc9f9f%2Fkqsomoi%2F2nDmu9hv4%2Ftumblr_static_ellie.jpg&hash=1ceeef5e7808c6806e8ca90b85c9b1853422b9ed)

"Because we're being trolled"
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sden.org%2FIMG%2Fjpg%2F1-bob-peck-jurassic-park.jpg&hash=07e0f1ee2144bdb6ee1b68b5fd9a252462ec326d)

"Oh God"
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.filmschoolrejects.com%2Fimages%2Fdern-jurassic.jpg&hash=7dbea5db78398be1d9fc73caa260fe6a195df37a)

"In the Godzilla and Sandler movie threads straight ahead. It's all right. RUN!"
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-nfWpGWU7dAQ%2FTVPczhKT9EI%2FAAAAAAAAAC8%2Fk9jpZGBsc5E%2Fs1600%2Fjp_417.jpg&hash=554b8e4be48b1c92beb8840d7bacbedaf1e8ad79)


Spoiler
"Don't reply! It can't troll us if you don't reply!"
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi839.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fzz314%2FAintGotTime2Bleed%2FGrant_zpsbb28e0ca.png&hash=91723b31cd96c0faef6499ed76d0730b63df6f1a)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Oct 05, 2014, 12:12:34 AM
 :D :D :D :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Aspie on Oct 05, 2014, 12:17:50 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2F19ijzMia1BaMg%2Fgiphy.gif&hash=b66486cb2ab36b11311202a876eb227c43c1a7d5)



Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wpclipart.com%2Fcartoon%2Fmonsters%2Ftroll%2Ftrollzilla.png&hash=1553a46d8f58723f3ea2e8448d46f2873d9e6ef2)
[close]
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: chrisr232007 on Oct 05, 2014, 12:32:41 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Oct 05, 2014, 12:17:50 AM
http://media.giphy.com/media/19ijzMia1BaMg/giphy.gif



Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wpclipart.com%2Fcartoon%2Fmonsters%2Ftroll%2Ftrollzilla.png&hash=1553a46d8f58723f3ea2e8448d46f2873d9e6ef2)
[close]
[close]
[close]

Who else but Aspie.. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Oct 05, 2014, 01:42:54 AM
Quote from: Crazy shrimp on Oct 04, 2014, 06:12:38 PM
Universal Promote Jurassic World at French Film Expo

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1309.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fs625%2Fatacamadesert86%2F10568881_616695975113523_4472714476598003282_n_zps2660fb81.jpg&hash=51774b4959e2f62b7b95e82950912b587a504a4e)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1309.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fs625%2Fatacamadesert86%2F1939578_616722478444206_8725513011995004479_n_zps9ab41aa4.jpg&hash=d8b13c1fa953fb7bba920cae24bebc13d3ed070a)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1309.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fs625%2Fatacamadesert86%2F10177469_616722425110878_3525052844035664936_n_zps5fa57c49.jpg&hash=65c8163057200ef8db361d1c17c688383fd3decc)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1309.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fs625%2Fatacamadesert86%2F10370373_616722355110885_6933051136045495686_n_zps2076efdf.jpg&hash=80de960bfb568515733ec04e341138390fa23d44)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1309.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fs625%2Fatacamadesert86%2F10494873_616756871774100_6387260796136458753_n_zpsa6927c3a.jpg&hash=4ada793166f1701b5adb4f269dba6c4467bcf0be)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1309.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fs625%2Fatacamadesert86%2F10703783_616757858440668_4279371162757152871_n1_zps88b257a5.jpg&hash=2cd0a4488798ada81840388e9e0cbd72490994ee)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1309.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fs625%2Fatacamadesert86%2F10670203_616757881773999_4751127672810888868_n_zps06738597.jpg&hash=541d6b363fba92030f4a61ae23da7e87e83a57d4)

https://www.facebook.com/jurassicworldnewsfrance (https://www.facebook.com/jurassicworldnewsfrance)
debunked ha thats not the design for the movie
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Oct 05, 2014, 02:55:30 AM
Quote from: Crazy shrimp on Oct 04, 2014, 06:12:38 PM
Universal Promote Jurassic World at French Film Expo

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1309.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fs625%2Fatacamadesert86%2F10568881_616695975113523_4472714476598003282_n_zps2660fb81.jpg&hash=51774b4959e2f62b7b95e82950912b587a504a4e)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1309.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fs625%2Fatacamadesert86%2F1939578_616722478444206_8725513011995004479_n_zps9ab41aa4.jpg&hash=d8b13c1fa953fb7bba920cae24bebc13d3ed070a)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1309.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fs625%2Fatacamadesert86%2F10177469_616722425110878_3525052844035664936_n_zps5fa57c49.jpg&hash=65c8163057200ef8db361d1c17c688383fd3decc)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1309.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fs625%2Fatacamadesert86%2F10370373_616722355110885_6933051136045495686_n_zps2076efdf.jpg&hash=80de960bfb568515733ec04e341138390fa23d44)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1309.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fs625%2Fatacamadesert86%2F10494873_616756871774100_6387260796136458753_n_zpsa6927c3a.jpg&hash=4ada793166f1701b5adb4f269dba6c4467bcf0be)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1309.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fs625%2Fatacamadesert86%2F10703783_616757858440668_4279371162757152871_n1_zps88b257a5.jpg&hash=2cd0a4488798ada81840388e9e0cbd72490994ee)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1309.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fs625%2Fatacamadesert86%2F10670203_616757881773999_4751127672810888868_n_zps06738597.jpg&hash=541d6b363fba92030f4a61ae23da7e87e83a57d4)

https://www.facebook.com/jurassicworldnewsfrance (https://www.facebook.com/jurassicworldnewsfrance)

pls b real it's the black metal version of a t.rex
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 05, 2014, 06:34:21 AM
They recycled a mould. I have seen that design already a lot of time ago.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Oct 05, 2014, 06:48:11 AM
excuse me while i go cri in the bathroom
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Oct 05, 2014, 04:31:32 PM
Fast & Furious 7!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 05, 2014, 06:09:24 PM
Quote from: TJ Doc on Oct 05, 2014, 04:31:32 PM
Fast & Furious 7!
??? ??? ???
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Oct 05, 2014, 06:14:02 PM
Saw it in the promo booklet.

... Got excited.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 05, 2014, 06:15:12 PM
Oh, got it. :laugh:

Maybe it's Fast & Furious & Dinosaurs. Kind of like that old TV series with Cadillacs, only with more Diesel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Oct 05, 2014, 07:15:33 PM
Pretty sure that's the exact formula for world peace.

Quote from: Omegazilla on Oct 05, 2014, 06:15:12 PM
Kind of like that old TV series with Cadillacs

Also this is the greatest thing I've ever had to look up on Google. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Oct 05, 2014, 10:57:24 PM
Quote from: BANE on Oct 05, 2014, 12:06:59 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Oct 04, 2014, 10:31:53 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Oct 04, 2014, 08:31:39 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg3.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20090430165232%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2F5%2F5c%2FJP-TimMurphy.jpg&hash=e104e9388b5490057137de9d6de06b01367a35f2)

"Plebasaurus Rex."
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.gyazo.com%2Fa73c8abc9dd9d0373e193e1bfd1f7ac0.png&hash=cf6eb24280cc491476028ec37c0dda07750128b6)

"Are those... Aspieating... uh, Aspiesauruses?"
Quote from: Omegazilla on Oct 04, 2014, 10:42:05 PM
"They... they're trolling this way."

"We can make it if we run"
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.tumblr.com%2F1c04beae8f1da4cb3fdbf0556abc9f9f%2Fkqsomoi%2F2nDmu9hv4%2Ftumblr_static_ellie.jpg&hash=1ceeef5e7808c6806e8ca90b85c9b1853422b9ed)

"No, we can't"
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sden.org%2FIMG%2Fjpg%2F1-bob-peck-jurassic-park.jpg&hash=07e0f1ee2144bdb6ee1b68b5fd9a252462ec326d)

"Why not?"
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.tumblr.com%2F1c04beae8f1da4cb3fdbf0556abc9f9f%2Fkqsomoi%2F2nDmu9hv4%2Ftumblr_static_ellie.jpg&hash=1ceeef5e7808c6806e8ca90b85c9b1853422b9ed)

"Because we're being trolled"
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sden.org%2FIMG%2Fjpg%2F1-bob-peck-jurassic-park.jpg&hash=07e0f1ee2144bdb6ee1b68b5fd9a252462ec326d)

"Oh God"
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.filmschoolrejects.com%2Fimages%2Fdern-jurassic.jpg&hash=7dbea5db78398be1d9fc73caa260fe6a195df37a)

"In the Godzilla and Sandler movie threads straight ahead. It's all right. RUN!"
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-nfWpGWU7dAQ%2FTVPczhKT9EI%2FAAAAAAAAAC8%2Fk9jpZGBsc5E%2Fs1600%2Fjp_417.jpg&hash=554b8e4be48b1c92beb8840d7bacbedaf1e8ad79)


Spoiler
"Don't reply! It can't troll us if you don't reply!"
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi839.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fzz314%2FAintGotTime2Bleed%2FGrant_zpsbb28e0ca.png&hash=91723b31cd96c0faef6499ed76d0730b63df6f1a)
[close]
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

All you guys win this thread lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Oct 06, 2014, 02:36:31 AM
"So you guys umm hm... feeding... feeding trolls? Ruh haha raaa raaa ruh haha AHAA HAHAA"

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs3-ak.buzzfeed.com%2Fstatic%2F2014-03%2Fcampaign_images%2Fwebdr07%2F5%2F13%2Fthis-remix-of-jeff-goldblum-laughing-in-jurassic--1-20220-1394043259-0_big.jpg&hash=bd3cc6e5fc1fe6f0c2765cf3dd357797a1a2d40d)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 07, 2014, 08:33:22 PM
Trailer Breakdown.

http://screenrant.com/jurassic-world-trailer-details/ (http://screenrant.com/jurassic-world-trailer-details/)

QuoteTrained muzzled velociraptors..

YESH. Gimme that madness. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Oct 07, 2014, 10:20:51 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Oct 07, 2014, 08:33:22 PM
Trailer Breakdown.

http://screenrant.com/jurassic-world-trailer-details/ (http://screenrant.com/jurassic-world-trailer-details/)

QuoteTrained muzzled velociraptors..

YESH. Gimme that madness. :D
i watched that you tube video of the guy who watched the trailer and the raptors arnt trained but appeared to be controlled to certain extent
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Oct 07, 2014, 10:46:11 PM
Remote controlled raptors you mean?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 07, 2014, 10:55:22 PM
Probably only very simple orders..  ???

The raptors in the John Sayles script had implants that gave them different doses of chemicals:
to make the animals hyped up on adrenaline; Serotonin to the brain's pleasure center as a reward for certain behaviours and other chemicals to make them faint if they got dangerous.

Some variation of that might still be in the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Oct 07, 2014, 10:58:04 PM
Like any potentially dangerous animal, all they really need is strokies and cuddles, and to be told they're a good boy/girl.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Oct 07, 2014, 11:00:44 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Oct 07, 2014, 10:55:22 PM
Problably only very simple orders..  ???

The raptors in the John Sayles script had implants that gave them different doses of chemicals:
to make the animals hyped up on adrenaline; Serotonin to the brain's pleasure center as a reward for certain behaviours and other chemicals to make them faint if they got dangerous.

Some variation of that might still be in the film.

I can see that working.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 07, 2014, 11:03:52 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Oct 07, 2014, 10:58:04 PM
Like any potentially dangerous animal, all they really need is strokies and cuddles, and to be told they're a good boy/girl.

All the dinos in the films are genetically engineered. These arent "wild animals". They were lab created.

Of course, in the Sayles script the "supposedly controlled" raptors escaped and murdered a ton of the people trying to control them.

I bet the same will happen here.

"Something something Chaos. Nature. Jeff Goldblum. Etc."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Oct 07, 2014, 11:05:01 PM
Nah, we all know Pratt will control them with a special 70s mix tape.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 07, 2014, 11:09:48 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Imhi98dHa5w#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Imhi98dHa5w#ws)

??????
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Oct 08, 2014, 01:09:55 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Oct 07, 2014, 08:33:22 PM
Trailer Breakdown.

http://screenrant.com/jurassic-world-trailer-details/ (http://screenrant.com/jurassic-world-trailer-details/)

QuoteTrained muzzled velociraptors..

YESH. Gimme that madness. :D

Hahaha shiiit yes, I hope the movie just let's loose with crazy bullshit at the end. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Oct 08, 2014, 08:59:32 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Oct 07, 2014, 08:33:22 PM
Trailer Breakdown.

http://screenrant.com/jurassic-world-trailer-details/ (http://screenrant.com/jurassic-world-trailer-details/)

QuoteTrained muzzled velociraptors..

YESH. Gimme that madness. :D

Remember, life finds a way and all that other illusion stuff.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 08, 2014, 12:22:51 PM
http://www.funnyordie.com/articles/2ed43bd692/review-of-gone-girl-from-a-guy-whose-favorite-movie-is-jurassic-park (http://www.funnyordie.com/articles/2ed43bd692/review-of-gone-girl-from-a-guy-whose-favorite-movie-is-jurassic-park)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Oct 08, 2014, 05:29:53 PM
Why has no one posted demon hell dinosaurs yet. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 08, 2014, 07:39:53 PM
Trailer breakdown:

Spoiler
- Starts off with a boat heading to Isla Nublar.
- Vehicles passing underneath a JWorld gate ..
- vehicles next to Gallimimus
- several tourists shots.
- Gyrosphere scene .. Apatosaurus appear.
- Claire says how genetics have advanced now and how they can make their own dinosaurs from scratch.
- Owen appears at the D.rex paddock, they see the claws marks, they discuss about it briefly. Someone says - She is dangerous, she is loose and she will get you (Something like that).
- Shark hung on a line gets eaten by Mosasaurus, splashing water onto the audience watching it.
- Someone getting dragged trough the jungle at night.
- Someone falling on the water.
- Woman screaming in terror.
- JP theme in a slower (possibly piano) version.
tagline .. THE PARK .. several tourist shots .. IS OPEN.
- Last scene - Owen says "if we have to do this, it has to be my way' then he approaches a muzzled raptor and pets it. Next shot is a group of raptors running through a field ( they have something on their heads).
- Jurassic World logo .. June 12th.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Oct 09, 2014, 11:37:48 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Oct 08, 2014, 07:39:53 PM
Trailer breakdown:

Spoiler
- Stars off with a boat heading to Isla Nublar.
- Vehicles passing underneath a JWorld gate ..
- vehicles next to Gallimimus
- several tourists shots.
- Gyrosphere scene .. Apatosaurus appear.
- Claire says how genetics have advanced now and how they can make their own dinosaurs from scratch.
- Owen appears at the D.rex paddock, they see the claws marks, they discuss about it briefly. Someone says - She is dangerous, she is loose and she will get you (Something like that).
- Shark hung on a line gets eaten by Mosasaurus, splashing water onto the audience watching it.
- Someone getting dragged trough the jungle at night.
- Someone falling on the water.
- Woman screaming in terror.
- JP theme in a slower (possibly piano) version.
tagline .. THE PARK .. several tourist shots .. IS OPEN.
- Last scene - Owen says "if we have to do this, it has to be my way' then he approaches a muzzled raptor and pets it. Next shot is a group of raptors running through a field ( they have something on their heads).
- Jurassic World logo .. June 12th.
[close]

HOW
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 09, 2014, 11:49:01 PM
MAGIC.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0p_1QSUsbsM# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0p_1QSUsbsM#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Oct 10, 2014, 12:19:09 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Oct 08, 2014, 07:39:53 PM
Trailer breakdown:

Spoiler
- Starts off with a boat heading to Isla Nublar.
- Vehicles passing underneath a JWorld gate ..
- vehicles next to Gallimimus
- several tourists shots.
- Gyrosphere scene .. Apatosaurus appear.
- Claire says how genetics have advanced now and how they can make their own dinosaurs from scratch.
- Owen appears at the D.rex paddock, they see the claws marks, they discuss about it briefly. Someone says - She is dangerous, she is loose and she will get you (Something like that).
- Shark hung on a line gets eaten by Mosasaurus, splashing water onto the audience watching it.
- Someone getting dragged trough the jungle at night.
- Someone falling on the water.
- Woman screaming in terror.
- JP theme in a slower (possibly piano) version.
tagline .. THE PARK .. several tourist shots .. IS OPEN.
- Last scene - Owen says "if we have to do this, it has to be my way' then he approaches a muzzled raptor and pets it. Next shot is a group of raptors running through a field ( they have something on their heads).
- Jurassic World logo .. June 12th.
[close]


I'm shocked by this new raptor thing, but very excited to see the mosasaur. Although it could also be interesting that they include other marine creatures, such as elasmosaur or liopleurodon
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Oct 10, 2014, 06:32:31 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Oct 08, 2014, 07:39:53 PM
Trailer breakdown:

Spoiler
- Starts off with a boat heading to Isla Nublar.
- Vehicles passing underneath a JWorld gate ..
- vehicles next to Gallimimus
- several tourists shots.
- Gyrosphere scene .. Apatosaurus appear.
- Claire says how genetics have advanced now and how they can make their own dinosaurs from scratch.
- Owen appears at the D.rex paddock, they see the claws marks, they discuss about it briefly. Someone says - She is dangerous, she is loose and she will get you (Something like that).
- Shark hung on a line gets eaten by Mosasaurus, splashing water onto the audience watching it.
- Someone getting dragged trough the jungle at night.
- Someone falling on the water.
- Woman screaming in terror.
- JP theme in a slower (possibly piano) version.
tagline .. THE PARK .. several tourist shots .. IS OPEN.
- Last scene - Owen says "if we have to do this, it has to be my way' then he approaches a muzzled raptor and pets it. Next shot is a group of raptors running through a field ( they have something on their heads).
- Jurassic World logo .. June 12th.
[close]
WHERE DID YOU HEAR/SEE THIS
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on Oct 10, 2014, 08:01:55 PM
yay it's
Spoiler
pet-raptors
[close]
... just what a JP movie needs... ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Oct 10, 2014, 08:36:35 PM
Not like it's dumber than wild raptors who say f**k all to just killing the cast when they're cornered and have their eggs. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Oct 10, 2014, 10:04:08 PM
-They wanted the eggs back in one piece
-Army noises
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Oct 10, 2014, 10:22:38 PM
I hate it when scriptwriters imbue oviparous animals with viviparous values.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 10, 2014, 10:24:23 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Oct 10, 2014, 10:22:38 PM
I hate it when scriptwriters imbueLab created genetically engineered oviparous animals with viviparous values.

...kay.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Oct 10, 2014, 10:25:33 PM
The modification doesn't really change anything about that sentence.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Oct 10, 2014, 10:26:47 PM
Ugh please you know what he's getting at.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Oct 10, 2014, 10:41:42 PM
Not really...  ???

Sigh. I'll risk diminishing the side-splitting hilarity by explaining.
Oviparous animals churn out eggs quickly, easily and typically en masse, they don't attach value to them like a K-strategist mammal does to its baby. Doesn't matter whether it's been grown in a lab, boffed out in a field or spontaneously popped into existence from a quirk of quantum physics.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 10, 2014, 10:56:29 PM
All that is fine and dandy but if the animals in this film also end up having mammal dna to specifically change their behaviour and inteligence.... Your complaint will be moot. :P

Anyway, even in the unused JP4 script, the "tamed" raptors werent rolling around in the fields waiting for scientists to pet them.. they were violent animals that were constantly strategizing ways to escape their captivity. The director already said the raptors arent gonna be "dog-like pets" in this... just predators in search of prey.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Oct 10, 2014, 11:06:09 PM
I, BANE and Rathalos were referring to JP3 :|

JW spoiler
Trained or even tame raptors don't stretch my credulity even slightly, I'd be shocked if you couldn't have done that with the real animals (to a degree, at least). Not sure how it'll play in the context of a movie though.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 10, 2014, 11:19:27 PM
D'oh!

Anyway, there's tons of stuff about dinos that we dont know and JP3 was just trying to be a bit "speculative" regarding dino behaviour... so.. whatevs, manggg. :P

And i highly doubt that real velociraptors were capable of being "tamed".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Oct 10, 2014, 11:42:36 PM
Can we get dragons in Jurassic World?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 10, 2014, 11:44:08 PM
Life will find a way.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Oct 10, 2014, 11:45:52 PM
Fire breathing T.Rex with giant horn on it's nose and spikes errwhere pls
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Oct 10, 2014, 11:46:40 PM
They can save that for Jurassic Park 5: Danger, Diabolus. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Oct 10, 2014, 11:47:59 PM
yaaaaaaaaaaaay
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Oct 11, 2014, 06:27:46 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Oct 10, 2014, 10:56:29 PM
All that is fine and dandy but if the animals in this film also end up having mammal dna to specifically change their behaviour and inteligence.... Your complaint will be moot. :P

Anyway, even in the unused JP4 script, the "tamed" raptors werent rolling around in the fields waiting for scientists to pet them.. they were violent animals that were constantly strategizing ways to escape their captivity. The director already said the raptors arent gonna be "dog-like pets" in this... just predators in search of prey.

How do you propose mammalian DNA is fused with Archosaurian DNA?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 11, 2014, 06:57:52 AM
JP3 wanted to portray particularly smart raptors... in the beginning they talk about how the ones seen previously were smarter than dolphins and apes -- go figure.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 11, 2014, 10:26:06 AM
Quote from: Gate on Oct 11, 2014, 06:27:46 AM
How do you propose mammalian DNA is fused with Archosaurian DNA?

I'm glad you asked..

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Foyster.ignimgs.com%2Fwordpress%2Fstg.ign.com%2F2014%2F03%2Fwong.png&hash=95e50afb65433fb1538a1fa02864215652958b9c)

Answer here:
Spoiler
SCIENCE.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naissus on Oct 11, 2014, 12:49:29 PM
More like Science!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Oct 11, 2014, 07:10:36 PM
Science can not fuse two completely different classes.



Archosauria and Amphibia/Reptilia are very similar, which is why it worked. Class Mammalia and Class Archosauria are worlds different despite being under the majority of land dwelling "chordata". Furthermore, ingelligence is not a genetic trait that you can claim was "fused"; the movies portray the animals as being likened to the intelligence of Whales and Primates.

I took an entire year for Zoological studies. Not even science can trump this. If it does, then Jurassic Park is no longer set in realistic sci-fi.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: orchidal on Oct 11, 2014, 07:14:10 PM
Quote from: Gate on Oct 11, 2014, 07:10:36 PM
Science can not fuse two completely different classes.



Archosauria and Amphibia/Reptilia are very similar, which is why it worked. Class Mammalia and Class Archosauria are worlds different despite being under the majority of land dwelling "chordata". Furthermore, ingelligence is not a genetic trait that you can claim was "fused"; the movies portray the animals as being likened to the intelligence of Whales and Primates.

I took an entire year for Zoological studies. Not even science can trump this. If it does, then Jurassic Park is no longer set in realistic sci-fi.

Yeh...I think the guys above implied the "Pseudo-" before the "Science"

When I see inaccurate entomology in films it really irks me, being an insect hobbyist...I feel your zoological pain.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 11, 2014, 07:22:59 PM
Quote from: Gate on Oct 11, 2014, 07:10:36 PM
Science can not fuse two completely different classes.

No hybridisation, sure. But it can do gene splicing:
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/jan/14/synthetic-biology-spider-goat-genetics (http://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/jan/14/synthetic-biology-spider-goat-genetics)

Quote from: Gate on Oct 11, 2014, 07:10:36 PM
If it does, then Jurassic Park is no longer set in realistic sci-fi.

Terrifying.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Oct 11, 2014, 07:24:59 PM
Quote from: Gate on Oct 11, 2014, 07:10:36 PM
I took an entire year for Zoological studies. Not even science can trump this. If it does, then Jurassic Park is no longer set in realistic sci-fi.
It never was to begin with ??? The entire premise of the original film is scientifically absurd. DNA only has a half life of 500 years or so.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 11, 2014, 07:25:28 PM
..shush.... let them inhabit their realistic scifi dreamland.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Oct 11, 2014, 07:29:57 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Oct 11, 2014, 07:24:59 PM
Quote from: Gate on Oct 11, 2014, 07:10:36 PM
I took an entire year for Zoological studies. Not even science can trump this. If it does, then Jurassic Park is no longer set in realistic sci-fi.
It never was to begin with ??? The entire premise of the original film is scientifically absurd. DNA only has a half life of 500 years or so.
That doesn't mean it's gone in 521 years. You could still realistically get DNA from a million years old bones, and I have no idea about buried tree sap.

This doesn't really need to be said, but over 1.5 million years would be unreadable, so yes, Dinosaurs 65+ million years old would be utterly impossible.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 11, 2014, 07:36:43 PM
Noooooo You just destroyed their illusion that Jurassic Park is realistic scifi! FILM IS RUINEDZORZ!

..who cares.  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Oct 11, 2014, 07:37:14 PM
Quote from: BANE on Oct 11, 2014, 07:29:57 PM
That doesn't mean it's gone in 521 years. You could still realistically get DNA from a million years old bones, and I have no idea about buried tree sap.

This doesn't really need to be said, but over 1.5 million years would be unreadable, so yes, Dinosaurs 65+ million years old would be utterly impossible.
No shit. Hence the entire premise of the original film being scientifically absurd.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Oct 11, 2014, 07:38:28 PM
Jesus people calm down I'm agreeing with you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 11, 2014, 07:40:07 PM
No, Bane. tis unforgivable.

Now Gate is gonna stalk you until the end of time because you explained why the film is scientifically unfeasable and thus ruined it FOREVER.

lol.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: orchidal on Oct 11, 2014, 08:14:13 PM
If the survivors of JP1 found out by the climax that all those goddamned dirty dinosaurs who'd been hunting them down were really just high functioning animatronics, real science would have been served.....
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Oct 11, 2014, 09:18:25 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Oct 11, 2014, 07:37:14 PM
Quote from: BANE on Oct 11, 2014, 07:29:57 PM
That doesn't mean it's gone in 521 years. You could still realistically get DNA from a million years old bones, and I have no idea about buried tree sap.

This doesn't really need to be said, but over 1.5 million years would be unreadable, so yes, Dinosaurs 65+ million years old would be utterly impossible.
No shit. Hence the entire premise of the original film being scientifically absurd.

Bane's right, the oldest known preserved DNA is around a million years old, and fragmented to the point that it's not currently workable.

Still, it wasn't implausible in the '80s when the story was written. At one point, it was thought it was just a question of finding the right piece of amber (although acquiring DNA is the tip of a very large iceberg when it comes to cloning dinosaurs, most points of which Crichton did address within the fiction).

Personally, I can't believe it will never be possible to recreate a Mesozoic dinosaur. When I was growing up, I thought we'd never know what colour dinosaurs were, what they sounded like, how much time they spent in water, that we'd ever find preserved organic material, that we'd find dinosaurs in Antarctica, that we'd narrow down to a virtual certainty what wiped them out, that we'd find evidence of them burrowing underground, that we'd finally achieve a consensus that they were warm-blooded, that we'd find incontrovertible proof that birds were not only related to but members of the Dinosauria, that my favourite dinosaur of the time would turn out to be covered in hairy proto-feathers and have wings, that Tyrannosaurus could bite through bone like we bite through mature cheddar, and that after 200 years of palaeontology, we'd still be finding entirely new major groups of dinosaurs and the first petrified remains. Etc, etc, etc.

The science has moved on at a mind-boggling pace for the last couple of decades, and I think it's just a matter of time before we find a way. It won't be an insect in amber, but maybe we'll be able to observe and reconstruct trace evidence of base pairs, or assemble such a thorough knowledge of the molecular clock that we're able to assemble the DNA of living birds' last common ancestor, or find enough protein in a bone to be properly workable.
And at that point, we'll be presented with the various questions posed by the story.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Oct 11, 2014, 09:21:22 PM
What we really need is to find some dinosaur's essential saltes and call it up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DaddyYautja on Oct 11, 2014, 09:33:08 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Oct 08, 2014, 07:39:53 PM
Trailer breakdown:

Spoiler
- Starts off with a boat heading to Isla Nublar.
- Vehicles passing underneath a JWorld gate ..
- vehicles next to Gallimimus
- several tourists shots.
- Gyrosphere scene .. Apatosaurus appear.
- Claire says how genetics have advanced now and how they can make their own dinosaurs from scratch.
- Owen appears at the D.rex paddock, they see the claws marks, they discuss about it briefly. Someone says - She is dangerous, she is loose and she will get you (Something like that).
- Shark hung on a line gets eaten by Mosasaurus, splashing water onto the audience watching it.
- Someone getting dragged trough the jungle at night.
- Someone falling on the water.
- Woman screaming in terror.
- JP theme in a slower (possibly piano) version.
tagline .. THE PARK .. several tourist shots .. IS OPEN.
- Last scene - Owen says "if we have to do this, it has to be my way' then he approaches a muzzled raptor and pets it. Next shot is a group of raptors running through a field ( they have something on their heads).
- Jurassic World logo .. June 12th.
[close]

Do the raptors have feathers? Cause if they dont im not watching the movie.
I can take trained raptors but raptors without feathers? NEVAAAHHHHH!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 11, 2014, 09:34:13 PM
Cvaldi, you rob the bones in the natural history museums..

I'll get the necronomicon.  :P



Quote from: DaddyYautja on Oct 11, 2014, 09:33:08 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Oct 08, 2014, 07:39:53 PM
Trailer breakdown:

Spoiler
- Starts off with a boat heading to Isla Nublar.
- Vehicles passing underneath a JWorld gate ..
- vehicles next to Gallimimus
- several tourists shots.
- Gyrosphere scene .. Apatosaurus appear.
- Claire says how genetics have advanced now and how they can make their own dinosaurs from scratch.
- Owen appears at the D.rex paddock, they see the claws marks, they discuss about it briefly. Someone says - She is dangerous, she is loose and she will get you (Something like that).
- Shark hung on a line gets eaten by Mosasaurus, splashing water onto the audience watching it.
- Someone getting dragged trough the jungle at night.
- Someone falling on the water.
- Woman screaming in terror.
- JP theme in a slower (possibly piano) version.
tagline .. THE PARK .. several tourist shots .. IS OPEN.
- Last scene - Owen says "if we have to do this, it has to be my way' then he approaches a muzzled raptor and pets it. Next shot is a group of raptors running through a field ( they have something on their heads).
- Jurassic World logo .. June 12th.
[close]

Do the raptors have feathers? Cause if they dont im not watching the movie.
I can take trained raptors but raptors without feathers? NEVAAAHHHHH!!!

They have feathers up the wazoo. Flowers, too.

They are hippies, essentially.



Quote from: Vertigo on Oct 11, 2014, 09:18:25 PM
Personally, I can't believe it will never be possible to recreate a Mesozoic dinosaur.

I think our knowledge of DNA manipulation (and creation) will grow and add up to the creation of artificial "wombs".. and it will enable us to essentially "design" these creatures again* ...and even create whatever new lifeforms we can imagine (within the realm of biological possibility) BUT... give or take 100 or 300 years. :P We wont be alive to see it.

*Of course, these lab created dinosaurs will essentially be speculative versions of what we think the real one's were like, based on paleontological studies... 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Oct 11, 2014, 11:06:35 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Oct 11, 2014, 09:18:25 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Oct 11, 2014, 07:37:14 PM
Quote from: BANE on Oct 11, 2014, 07:29:57 PM
That doesn't mean it's gone in 521 years. You could still realistically get DNA from a million years old bones, and I have no idea about buried tree sap.

This doesn't really need to be said, but over 1.5 million years would be unreadable, so yes, Dinosaurs 65+ million years old would be utterly impossible.
No shit. Hence the entire premise of the original film being scientifically absurd.

Bane's right, the oldest known preserved DNA is around a million years old, and fragmented to the point that it's not currently workable.

Still, it wasn't implausible in the '80s when the story was written. At one point, it was thought it was just a question of finding the right piece of amber (although acquiring DNA is the tip of a very large iceberg when it comes to cloning dinosaurs, most points of which Crichton did address within the fiction).

Personally, I can't believe it will never be possible to recreate a Mesozoic dinosaur. When I was growing up, I thought we'd never know what colour dinosaurs were, what they sounded like, how much time they spent in water, that we'd ever find preserved organic material, that we'd find dinosaurs in Antarctica, that we'd narrow down to a virtual certainty what wiped them out, that we'd find evidence of them burrowing underground, that we'd finally achieve a consensus that they were warm-blooded, that we'd find incontrovertible proof that birds were not only related to but members of the Dinosauria, that my favourite dinosaur of the time would turn out to be covered in hairy proto-feathers and have wings, that Tyrannosaurus could bite through bone like we bite through mature cheddar, and that after 200 years of palaeontology, we'd still be finding entirely new major groups of dinosaurs and the first petrified remains. Etc, etc, etc.

The science has moved on at a mind-boggling pace for the last couple of decades, and I think it's just a matter of time before we find a way. It won't be an insect in amber, but maybe we'll be able to observe and reconstruct trace evidence of base pairs, or assemble such a thorough knowledge of the molecular clock that we're able to assemble the DNA of living birds' last common ancestor, or find enough protein in a bone to be properly workable.
And at that point, we'll be presented with the various questions posed by the story.
I'm envious of your passion. The last thing I was ever this passionate about were f**king Yu Gi Oh cards when I was 10.  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Oct 11, 2014, 11:07:27 PM
Quote from: Cvalda on Oct 11, 2014, 09:21:22 PM
What we really need is to find some dinosaur's essential saltes and call it up.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F_-Iefy8VdG8A%2FSHahM42ciUI%2FAAAAAAAADqk%2FHPkD9wgeDyU%2Fs400%2Fcap287.bmp&hash=0f253acc3cea3c9d6138e6cfc9ce9ae066ac645f)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cvalda on Oct 11, 2014, 11:07:46 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Oct 11, 2014, 09:34:13 PM
I think our knowledge of DNA manipulation (and creation) will grow and add up to the creation of artificial "wombs".. and it will enable us to essentially "design" these creatures again* ...and even create whatever new lifeforms we can imagine (within the realm of biological possibility) BUT... give or take 100 or 300 years. :P We wont be alive to see it.
We'll be in the shit in 100-300 years, probably won't be any money or resources left for such a useless technological enterprise :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 11, 2014, 11:15:33 PM
Yeah i forgot about the flying polyps.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Oct 12, 2014, 05:28:02 AM
I'm slowly dying on the inside.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 12, 2014, 06:22:38 AM
Quote from: Cvalda on Oct 11, 2014, 09:21:22 PM
What we really need is to find some dinosaur's essential saltes and call it up.
Hahahahaha, YES!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Oct 15, 2014, 12:40:08 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bz8qhiYCYAEHhDL.jpg:large)


Colin TrevorrowVerified account ‏@colintrevorrow

#TheParkIsOpen
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 15, 2014, 12:42:36 AM
Hory shiett
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 15, 2014, 12:46:15 AM
Such a beautiful poster.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Oct 15, 2014, 12:52:26 AM
It's happening guys.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 15, 2014, 01:30:36 AM
I love the textures/colour in the logo. :P Elegant, simple.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Oct 15, 2014, 01:42:46 AM
Super HQ

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wearemoviegeeks.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FJSW_1Sheet_RGB_1013_1_CT.jpg&hash=5d0af5663d29b442b24a5ff21d5f687a18515b82)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Oct 15, 2014, 02:29:30 AM
I liked the blue in the original logo they had planned for this, but this one is even better.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Oct 15, 2014, 02:32:03 AM
Stainless steel T. rex skeleton... releases same year as T5... ohmahgawd.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Oct 15, 2014, 02:37:19 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Oct 15, 2014, 02:32:03 AM
Stainless steel T. rex skeleton... releases same year as T5... ohmahgawd.

We're one step closer to the T-1000000.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg2.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20131004013537%2Fgoanimate%2Fimages%2F8%2F8c%2FT-1%2C000%2C000.jpg&hash=8111dc1cf617667708b9c23dbee2e51cfa535eb9)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 15, 2014, 09:55:39 AM
All four teaser posters.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bz-rdeYCQAA4tnL.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Oct 15, 2014, 11:58:25 AM
The Lost World is still my favorite. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Oct 15, 2014, 12:06:27 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 15, 2014, 09:55:39 AM
All four teaser posters.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bz-rdeYCQAA4tnL.jpg

They keep getting paler.... so Jurassic World will be the crappiest film yet. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 23, 2014, 03:44:23 AM
Trailer is rumored to be delayed until December with The Hobbit 3  >:(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Oct 23, 2014, 04:33:16 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Oct 15, 2014, 12:06:27 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 15, 2014, 09:55:39 AM
All four teaser posters.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bz-rdeYCQAA4tnL.jpg

They keep getting paler.... so Jurassic World will be the crappiest film yet. :P

It's all for the slow-burn lead up to the all-white poster... and Ice Age Park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Oct 23, 2014, 07:59:44 AM
That would just be a regular zoo, given that we're currently in an ice age...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Oct 23, 2014, 08:07:34 AM
Yeah, and the vast majority of the creatures in these films are from the Cretaceous.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Oct 23, 2014, 10:30:07 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1371.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fag299%2Fenchiridion86%2Fulx42kx96fyrijjvbuu0_zps7orviywn.gif&hash=dcdfbac9779f893595d64295dfc965579771d4bf)

http://vimeo.com/109546414 (http://vimeo.com/109546414)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 30, 2014, 02:50:15 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Oct 23, 2014, 04:33:16 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Oct 15, 2014, 12:06:27 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 15, 2014, 09:55:39 AM
All four teaser posters.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bz-rdeYCQAA4tnL.jpg

They keep getting paler.... so Jurassic World will be the crappiest film yet. :P

It's all for the slow-burn lead up to the all-white poster... and Ice Age Park.

My God!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Oct 31, 2014, 12:28:02 AM
I've seen those dinosaur puppets for sale!

http://www.puppetoys.com/index.htm (http://www.puppetoys.com/index.htm)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Nov 02, 2014, 11:48:28 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Oct 23, 2014, 03:44:23 AM
Trailer is rumored to be delayed until December with The Hobbit 3  >:(

I've heard this too. Interstellar is getting Furious 7 instead.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 02, 2014, 12:25:39 PM
...f**king hell.  >:(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Nov 02, 2014, 05:24:41 PM
Quote from: Gilfryd on Nov 02, 2014, 11:48:28 AM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Oct 23, 2014, 03:44:23 AM
Trailer is rumored to be delayed until December with The Hobbit 3  >:(

I've heard this too. Interstellar is getting Furious 7 instead.

::) ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 02, 2014, 05:28:18 PM
I don't care. The Rock bursting his arm out of a cast will look epic on an IMAX screen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Nov 02, 2014, 05:32:29 PM
But we already seen it. :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 02, 2014, 05:33:27 PM
We've already seen dinosaurs, too. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Nov 02, 2014, 05:36:25 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Nov 02, 2014, 05:33:27 PM
We've already seen dinosaurs, too. :P

13 years ago. The next FF looks exactly like the other twelve.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Nov 04, 2014, 11:32:34 AM
The Jurassic World Twitter site has this morning tweeted a date - 12.17.14.

https://twitter.com/JurassicPark_4/status/529544451287695360
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Nov 04, 2014, 11:49:16 AM
They're adding five more months to the year, just so Jurassic World can release in 2014.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Nov 04, 2014, 10:38:31 PM
so is the trailer supposed to play with interstellar?

im pretty sure thats a trailer date they tweeted. or the end of the world.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Nov 05, 2014, 06:26:42 PM
Quote from: Taxemic on Nov 04, 2014, 11:32:34 AM
The Jurassic World Twitter site has this morning tweeted a date - 12.17.14.

https://twitter.com/JurassicPark_4/status/529544451287695360

But that's not the official Twitter account... This is: https://twitter.com/JurassicPark
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Nov 06, 2014, 04:53:18 PM
So apparently concepts for the Diabolus Rex have leaked...and if you all remember that pic from a while back that looked like like a giant jaw? Welp...

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F-wrq6WV47N3I%2FU_Ud2VGAEEI%2FAAAAAAAAAjw%2FXqBaK8IK2Ag%2Fs1600%2F10596065_10202655934141376_1316880235_n.jpg&hash=bb110777fae5a23e724563dfc421712a69998dc4)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-ZwM79qqNdzo%2FU_Udz8xtNFI%2FAAAAAAAAAjs%2F8x8cSI4nFJE%2Fs1600%2F1908412_10202669363077091_3887801361221116711_n.jpg&hash=2dcfc5b18eada7d2e5a1f28585a5e64bf25871e4)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-mCPMZbhD6ic%2FU_Ud0fjQWdI%2FAAAAAAAAAjo%2FP4GJ0LOTAF8%2Fs1600%2FD-rex.jpg&hash=0350740bad227a74b0ab96f8e5faa6564614af6d)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Nov 06, 2014, 05:26:35 PM
Don't know how I feel about the
Spoiler
bifurcated upper/frontal jaw/snout.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Nov 06, 2014, 05:33:50 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Nov 06, 2014, 04:53:18 PM
So apparently concepts for the Diabolus Rex have leaked...and if you all remember that pic from a while back that looked like like a giant jaw? Welp...

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F-wrq6WV47N3I%2FU_Ud2VGAEEI%2FAAAAAAAAAjw%2FXqBaK8IK2Ag%2Fs1600%2F10596065_10202655934141376_1316880235_n.jpg&hash=bb110777fae5a23e724563dfc421712a69998dc4)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-ZwM79qqNdzo%2FU_Udz8xtNFI%2FAAAAAAAAAjs%2F8x8cSI4nFJE%2Fs1600%2F1908412_10202669363077091_3887801361221116711_n.jpg&hash=2dcfc5b18eada7d2e5a1f28585a5e64bf25871e4)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-mCPMZbhD6ic%2FU_Ud0fjQWdI%2FAAAAAAAAAjo%2FP4GJ0LOTAF8%2Fs1600%2FD-rex.jpg&hash=0350740bad227a74b0ab96f8e5faa6564614af6d)
[close]
JP's own Super Predator moment.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 06, 2014, 05:37:35 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Nov 06, 2014, 04:53:18 PM
So apparently concepts for the Diabolus Rex have leaked...and if you all remember that pic from a while back that looked like like a giant jaw? Welp...

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F-wrq6WV47N3I%2FU_Ud2VGAEEI%2FAAAAAAAAAjw%2FXqBaK8IK2Ag%2Fs1600%2F10596065_10202655934141376_1316880235_n.jpg&hash=bb110777fae5a23e724563dfc421712a69998dc4)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-ZwM79qqNdzo%2FU_Udz8xtNFI%2FAAAAAAAAAjs%2F8x8cSI4nFJE%2Fs1600%2F1908412_10202669363077091_3887801361221116711_n.jpg&hash=2dcfc5b18eada7d2e5a1f28585a5e64bf25871e4)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-mCPMZbhD6ic%2FU_Ud0fjQWdI%2FAAAAAAAAAjo%2FP4GJ0LOTAF8%2Fs1600%2FD-rex.jpg&hash=0350740bad227a74b0ab96f8e5faa6564614af6d)
[close]
Hope to God this Resident Evil reject is not what the new dinosaur looks like...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightlord on Nov 06, 2014, 05:40:58 PM
From the side it looks alright, but then you see it.

I suppose since the concept is gene spliced super killer I can accept it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 06, 2014, 06:06:41 PM
...those are fan made.

How the f**k would people think these are real is beyond me. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Nov 06, 2014, 06:07:08 PM
You never know, y'know? :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 06, 2014, 06:08:24 PM
Saw those months ago in a fan site :P y'know.

Think you can find them on deviantart.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Nov 06, 2014, 06:09:48 PM
Ah. :P

I mostly assumed they were real cause of that one black and white photo from a while back
Spoiler
that had a dinosaur jaw that looks strikingly similar to that. :P
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Nov 06, 2014, 08:02:10 PM
yep, those are fan made ha saw dem pics ages ago.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 08, 2014, 01:55:21 PM
Alien3, you'll like this ;)

http://moviepilot.com/posts/2014/11/06/these-amazing-jurassic-park-facts-make-me-love-the-movie-more-than-ever-before-2411265? (http://moviepilot.com/posts/2014/11/06/these-amazing-jurassic-park-facts-make-me-love-the-movie-more-than-ever-before-2411265?)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Nov 16, 2014, 12:08:08 AM
First look at a Lego Dino?

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=111129 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=111129)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 16, 2014, 09:18:58 AM
Hate to base myself on a LEGO set, but this guy does not seem too mutated looking -- thank God.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 16, 2014, 04:09:49 PM
Colin always said that the D-Rex was gonna look and behave like a dinosaur.
The Island of Dr. Moreau meets James Bond vibes and monstruous concept art was left behind with the Sayles script.

(We still get a trained team of velociraptor's though.)  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 16, 2014, 04:23:07 PM
Those Concepts!  :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomorphine on Nov 16, 2014, 09:57:32 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Nov 16, 2014, 12:08:08 AM
First look at a Lego Dino?

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=111129 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=111129)

Spoiler
So, basically, an albino Rex?

Talk about underwhelming... It's the 'Prometheus' creature design debacle, all over again.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 16, 2014, 11:18:08 PM
dewd. That's just a small lego figure. Cant really tell how KEWL it be. besides...

Spoiler
I bet ya 3 fiddy that thing will be able to change colours like the Carnotaurus in the Lost World novel.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Nov 17, 2014, 05:04:11 AM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Nov 16, 2014, 11:18:08 PM
dewd. That's just a small lego figure. Cant really tell how KEWL it be. besides...

Spoiler
I bet ya 3 fiddy that thing will be able to change colours like the Carnotaurus in the Lost World novel.
[close]

Spoiler
dat cuttlefish dna 8)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Nov 17, 2014, 07:03:49 AM
But can a D-Rex win in a fight against a V-Rex
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 17, 2014, 03:29:59 PM
^That's an important question.

The answer might save mankind.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Nov 17, 2014, 08:34:08 PM
IT'S HAPPENING

http://www.masraniglobal.com/index.html (http://www.masraniglobal.com/index.html)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Nov 17, 2014, 08:50:11 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Nov 17, 2014, 08:34:08 PM
IT'S HAPPENING

http://www.masraniglobal.com/index.html (http://www.masraniglobal.com/index.html)
Awesome. ;D

Just signed up as an intern. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 17, 2014, 09:10:26 PM
You're welcome. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 17, 2014, 09:11:59 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 17, 2014, 09:10:26 PM
You're welcome. 8)

u behind this again! eh. Congrats. Neatly designed website. :) 

anyway.

WU!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.masraniglobal.com%2Fimg%2Fmedia_pic4_large.jpg&hash=535a42b233dca6362cbd026a4c86cf57a0c48a19)

Tang! WU TANG.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Nov 17, 2014, 09:14:30 PM
He looks good. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 17, 2014, 09:15:55 PM
Dr. Wu aint nuthing ta f wit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Nov 17, 2014, 09:18:46 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 17, 2014, 09:10:26 PM
You're welcome. 8)

Wut?

Are you working on this? :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Nov 17, 2014, 09:24:21 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 17, 2014, 09:22:58 PM
Yep.

Myself and my friend Tim build and wrote everything you see on the site.

Fantastic. Well done. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 17, 2014, 09:24:41 PM
so.. how does the film end, mate?  ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Nov 17, 2014, 10:23:19 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 17, 2014, 09:22:58 PMYep.

Myself and my friend Tim build and wrote everything you see on the site.

What? Universal got in touch with you after the fake website event?

Anyway, trailer in 10 days. Confirmed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Nov 17, 2014, 10:26:26 PM
...kiss Wu, what?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 17, 2014, 10:37:43 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Nov 17, 2014, 10:23:19 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 17, 2014, 09:22:58 PMYep.

Myself and my friend Tim build and wrote everything you see on the site.

What? Universal got in touch with you after the fake website event?

Anyway, trailer in 10 days. Confirmed.

That is right.
Why'd you think I'm trying to keep everyone spoiler free?! :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Nov 17, 2014, 10:39:55 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 17, 2014, 10:37:43 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Nov 17, 2014, 10:23:19 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 17, 2014, 09:22:58 PMYep.

Myself and my friend Tim build and wrote everything you see on the site.

What? Universal got in touch with you after the fake website event?

Anyway, trailer in 10 days. Confirmed.

That is right.
Why'd you think I'm trying to keep everyone spoiler free?! :P

spoil the movie for me please idc
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 17, 2014, 10:49:11 PM
Time to get Jurassicy!!!!  ;D ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 17, 2014, 11:35:34 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 17, 2014, 10:37:43 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Nov 17, 2014, 10:23:19 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 17, 2014, 09:22:58 PMYep.

Myself and my friend Tim build and wrote everything you see on the site.

What? Universal got in touch with you after the fake website event?

Anyway, trailer in 10 days. Confirmed.

That is right.
Why'd you think I'm trying to keep everyone spoiler free?! :P

But we already know what kind of cars they have.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 17, 2014, 11:45:04 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2FM31G94ayUWQpO%2Fgiphy.gif&hash=91579319f92740e028ae4a85cdbf42f0fa48619b)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 18, 2014, 12:30:28 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 17, 2014, 11:45:04 PM
http://media.giphy.com/media/M31G94ayUWQpO/giphy.gif

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.pandawhale.com%2F97464-django-unchained-ending-smile-vRK0.gif&hash=0b71d6bc34f87c7c9fd77ae1e250e56f46b8e54e)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Nov 18, 2014, 03:45:47 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Nov 17, 2014, 09:11:59 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 17, 2014, 09:10:26 PM
You're welcome. 8)

u behind this again! eh. Congrats. Neatly designed website. :) 

anyway.

WU!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.masraniglobal.com%2Fimg%2Fmedia_pic4_large.jpg&hash=535a42b233dca6362cbd026a4c86cf57a0c48a19)

Tang! WU TANG.

Damn I wasn't aware he was actually returning. That would've been a nice surprise. I shouldn't have come in here ;-;
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 19, 2014, 09:10:18 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmBX_9EtLYk (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmBX_9EtLYk)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Nov 19, 2014, 04:00:25 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 19, 2014, 09:10:18 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmBX_9EtLYk (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmBX_9EtLYk)

Awesome
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Nov 20, 2014, 08:55:48 PM
Teaser Trailer Announcement

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7bk9glvzXA (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7bk9glvzXA)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Nov 20, 2014, 11:15:29 PM
Quote from: Taxemic on Nov 20, 2014, 08:55:48 PM
Teaser Trailer Announcement

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7bk9glvzXA (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7bk9glvzXA)
Ah, the wonders of movie maker.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Nov 21, 2014, 12:48:19 AM
Quote from: Taxemic on Nov 20, 2014, 08:55:48 PM
Teaser Trailer Announcement

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7bk9glvzXA (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7bk9glvzXA)
7 ripples, 7 more days till trailer! cant wait  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Nov 23, 2014, 03:09:37 PM
Teaser for the trailer: https://amp.twimg.com/v/bd60d496-3d9c-41d2-aa75-b4a0de6b5268 (https://amp.twimg.com/v/bd60d496-3d9c-41d2-aa75-b4a0de6b5268)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on Nov 23, 2014, 03:16:17 PM
Lol... teaser to the teaser trailer in the line of many trailers to come... oh hollywood  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Nov 23, 2014, 03:19:09 PM
Oh boy....so close


EDIT: i'll imbed a Youtube version here

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msKs0pSdVP4#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msKs0pSdVP4#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Nov 23, 2014, 03:23:43 PM
YouTube link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvdIL7pUjcg#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvdIL7pUjcg#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 23, 2014, 03:29:04 PM
Pumped!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Nov 23, 2014, 03:32:56 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Nov 23, 2014, 03:23:43 PM
YouTube link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvdIL7pUjcg#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvdIL7pUjcg#ws)
I can't wait! ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Nov 23, 2014, 03:52:24 PM
First reaction - OH SHIT, IT IS FINALLY HAPPENING
Second reaction - they've redesigned the Gallimimus, yet they still have baldness and bunny hands.  ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Nov 23, 2014, 03:56:06 PM
no one cares
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ryu on Nov 23, 2014, 03:57:24 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FIpzSTOJ.png&hash=ccf556983644f7ba2e478ae77908624454ddcf56)
Very Terra Nova.
Why north of the island is restricted?
The ruins of the Old Park?
Raptors Nest?
Something more sinister?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Effectz on Nov 23, 2014, 04:08:55 PM
Probably it's off limits to the public,the cameras on the left seem to be keeping an eye on visitors.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ryu on Nov 23, 2014, 04:17:43 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Nov 23, 2014, 03:52:24 PM
First reaction - OH SHIT, IT IS FINALLY HAPPENING
Second reaction - they've redesigned the Gallimimus, yet they still have baldness and bunny hands.  ::)
(https://scontent-a-atl.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfa1/t31.0-8/10257962_816917288331476_8448622767411367591_o.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 23, 2014, 04:20:32 PM
I like. Gonna be really fun seeing a park that's actually up and running.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 23, 2014, 04:54:20 PM
Quote from: Ryu on Nov 23, 2014, 03:57:24 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FIpzSTOJ.png&hash=ccf556983644f7ba2e478ae77908624454ddcf56)
Very Terra Nova.
Why north of the island is restricted?
The ruins of the Old Park?
Raptors Nest?
Something more sinister?

You come up with allow that, and my only reaction to the pic was "Unf." :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Nov 23, 2014, 05:35:40 PM
I SO PUMPD I FORGET HOW ENGRIS
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Nov 23, 2014, 06:30:00 PM
Still processing the fact that this is actually happening.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Nov 23, 2014, 06:38:01 PM
Quote from: Ryu on Nov 23, 2014, 04:17:43 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Nov 23, 2014, 03:52:24 PM
First reaction - OH SHIT, IT IS FINALLY HAPPENING
Second reaction - they've redesigned the Gallimimus, yet they still have baldness and bunny hands.  ::)
(https://scontent-a-atl.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfa1/t31.0-8/10257962_816917288331476_8448622767411367591_o.jpg)

This is a great callback to the first movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 23, 2014, 06:45:10 PM
A herd of gallimimus doing what "gallimimus do" isnt really a callback to the first film..

it just means that they put gallimimus again in a JP film :P

The "gate" scene is totally a callback, doe.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Nov 23, 2014, 06:53:30 PM
Don't like that control room. Doesn't look functional.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 23, 2014, 06:57:32 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Nov 23, 2014, 06:53:30 PM
Don't like that control room. Doesn't look functional.

To be fair, neither was the original's. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Nov 23, 2014, 06:58:42 PM
It looked functional, though. And the look is half the battle.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 23, 2014, 07:20:30 PM
I think the new one needs a Nedry.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Nov 23, 2014, 07:35:18 PM
That's the other half.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 23, 2014, 07:36:43 PM
Too bad he's working as a mailman in New York.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 23, 2014, 07:58:55 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1o4H4vc0wyI (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1o4H4vc0wyI)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on Nov 23, 2014, 08:11:53 PM
Quote from: Ryu on Nov 23, 2014, 04:17:43 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Nov 23, 2014, 03:52:24 PM
First reaction - OH SHIT, IT IS FINALLY HAPPENING
Second reaction - they've redesigned the Gallimimus, yet they still have baldness and bunny hands.  ::)
(https://scontent-a-atl.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfa1/t31.0-8/10257962_816917288331476_8448622767411367591_o.jpg)

Theropod intercepting in 3... 2... 1...  8)

I think since they probably kept on splicing dino-dna with various other dna, it's only natural that they have a different design.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Nov 23, 2014, 08:29:38 PM
Quote from: Ryu on Nov 23, 2014, 03:57:24 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FIpzSTOJ.png&hash=ccf556983644f7ba2e478ae77908624454ddcf56)
Very Terra Nova.
Why north of the island is restricted?
The ruins of the Old Park?
Raptors Nest?
Something more sinister?

Nice eye with the RESTRICTED bit. Hope it's the ruins of the old park, that our characters stumble upon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 23, 2014, 08:35:56 PM
I haven't really been following this film as closely as some of you, but is it the same island as the first film?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 23, 2014, 08:37:59 PM
Nublar. Yes.

4th film in the series and the 2nd that takes place in that island.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Nov 23, 2014, 08:48:25 PM
Quote from: Ryu on Nov 23, 2014, 03:57:24 PMWhy north of the island is restricted?
The ruins of the Old Park?
Raptors Nest?
Something more sinister?

Spoiler
From what I understand, it's where the animals from the old park are still living. Masrani Corp just set up a 'safe zone' in the middle. Not entirely sure why, but hopefully that'll become clear.

Compared with the best JP map available (http://www.jplegacy.org/jptour/images/map/islanublar.gif), it looks like the restricted zone starts slightly north of the old visitors' centre and main gate; the only film locations within it are the jeep tour paddocks.

Super spoiler; seriously
But I dimly remember hearing that one JW location will be the ruins of the old VC.
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Nov 23, 2014, 08:54:43 PM
I miss the old Explorers. The monorail isn't going to be nearly as iconic as those were.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Nov 23, 2014, 09:04:48 PM
But they got f**king bubbles!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 23, 2014, 09:06:50 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Nov 23, 2014, 08:54:43 PM
I miss the old Explorers. The monorail isn't going to be nearly as iconic as those were.

Learn to let go brother.

The Gyrosphere's are the new Explorers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: viendammage on Nov 23, 2014, 09:26:26 PM
Teaser of a teaser trailer, are you kidding me?!  Come on America, rise up and show the studios you won't take it anymore.  Already impressed me with the lower turnout for the unnecessary two part Hunger Games movie opening this weekend. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 23, 2014, 09:31:53 PM
Quote from: viendammage on Nov 23, 2014, 09:26:26 PM
Teaser of a teaser trailer, are you kidding me?!  Come on America, rise up and show the studios you won't take it anymore.

It's hardly unprecedented. This has been going on for years now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 23, 2014, 09:47:07 PM
Prometheus was the first time I saw a teaser for a trailer.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 23, 2014, 09:49:07 PM
Yo dawg, we heard you like trailers, so we made a trailer for yo trailer.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Nov 23, 2014, 10:03:01 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Nov 23, 2014, 06:30:00 PM
Still processing the fact that this is actually happening.

Yeah, I kind of feel the same about more Star Wars.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 23, 2014, 10:05:45 PM
I AM IN TEARS


I cannot wait for this shit man, I'm all over it, holy frak it should come out tomorrow.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Nov 24, 2014, 12:59:22 AM
Quote from: Ryu on Nov 23, 2014, 03:57:24 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FIpzSTOJ.png&hash=ccf556983644f7ba2e478ae77908624454ddcf56)
Very Terra Nova.
Why north of the island is restricted?
The ruins of the Old Park?
Raptors Nest?
Something more sinister?

Based on the far right, I wonder how much weather plays a role in the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 24, 2014, 01:01:42 AM
That's probably them going. "Let's not let a storm f**k us over like before."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Nov 24, 2014, 01:35:07 AM
Unfortunately, I was never into Jurassic Park.

I remember I loved the first 30 minutes of the movie, all that wonderful science fiction and that, but the moment it becomes a slasher film, it completely lost my attention...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Nov 24, 2014, 02:04:47 AM
Well the dinosaurs got loose. There's not too many other ways it could have realistically played out without it going into ridiculous territories.


Spoiler

(https://33.media.tumblr.com/d02656a86f28b5d31f3b4fff2361b07b/tumblr_n2hnvubaG71s2wio8o1_500.gif)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 24, 2014, 02:08:25 AM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Nov 24, 2014, 02:04:47 AM
Well the dinosaurs got loose. There's not too many other ways it could have realistically played out without it going into ridiculous territories.


Spoiler

(https://33.media.tumblr.com/d02656a86f28b5d31f3b4fff2361b07b/tumblr_n2hnvubaG71s2wio8o1_500.gif)
[close]

Spoiler
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrYxLSSSRd0# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrYxLSSSRd0#)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alienseseses on Nov 24, 2014, 02:28:23 AM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Nov 24, 2014, 02:04:47 AM
Well the dinosaurs got loose. There's not too many other ways it could have realistically played out without it going into ridiculous territories.


Spoiler

(https://33.media.tumblr.com/d02656a86f28b5d31f3b4fff2361b07b/tumblr_n2hnvubaG71s2wio8o1_500.gif)
[close]
...please tell me what this is from.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Nov 24, 2014, 02:36:58 AM
I wonder if some day they will make a new JP movie in which the dinosaurs don't get loose or become a slasher film. Until then.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: viendammage on Nov 24, 2014, 02:39:57 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 23, 2014, 09:31:53 PM
Quote from: viendammage on Nov 23, 2014, 09:26:26 PM
Teaser of a teaser trailer, are you kidding me?!  Come on America, rise up and show the studios you won't take it anymore.

It's hardly unprecedented. This has been going on for years now.

Frigging Prometheus, look how that turned out...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Nov 24, 2014, 04:16:34 AM
Quote from: Magegg on Nov 24, 2014, 02:36:58 AM
I wonder if some day they will make a new JP movie in which the dinosaurs don't get loose or become a slasher film. Until then.

So what it would just be a fictional documentary? Much less thrilling than what the JP's offer.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Nov 24, 2014, 04:43:16 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Nov 24, 2014, 04:16:34 AM
Quote from: Magegg on Nov 24, 2014, 02:36:58 AM
I wonder if some day they will make a new JP movie in which the dinosaurs don't get loose or become a slasher film. Until then.

So what it would just be a fictional documentary? Much less thrilling than what the JP's offer.
Don't know, maybe some adventure movie, mystery or something.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Nov 24, 2014, 05:30:02 AM
Quote from: Magegg on Nov 24, 2014, 04:43:16 AM

maybe some adventure movie

That's what they already are... ???
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Nov 24, 2014, 05:53:38 AM
I thought they were more like thrillers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Nov 24, 2014, 07:24:48 AM
Have you watched any of these movies mate?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 24, 2014, 07:46:35 AM
Quote from: Alienseseses on Nov 24, 2014, 02:28:23 AM
...please tell me what this is from.
The Valley of Gwangi.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Nov 24, 2014, 09:10:28 AM
happening

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B3MgD8QCEAQ_O8x.png)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 24, 2014, 09:16:16 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Nov 24, 2014, 09:10:28 AM
happening

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B3MgD8QCEAQ_O8x.png

Ooh child, things are gonna get easier...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Nov 24, 2014, 09:28:28 AM
Leaked fragments from a workprint (some shots are unfinished): http://movies.cosmicbooknews.com/content/jurassic-world-trailer-leaks-online (http://movies.cosmicbooknews.com/content/jurassic-world-trailer-leaks-online)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Nov 24, 2014, 09:51:49 AM
It's a shame we live in such a society where leaking is so easy (Age of Ultron) but as a man with little restraint I've watched them already

and enjoyed it

I love how the guy taking the videos is freaking out as well.  :D

Spoiler
The Velociraptors look absolutely identical to the ones in the first movie!   :) And I'm pleasantly almost-surprised-but-on-second-thought-of-course by the Mosasaur (too large I'd think?) appearance.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Nov 24, 2014, 10:11:42 AM
Hmmm. I'm going to go out on a limb and say that the velicoraptors in this workprint version ARE literally from Jurassic Park.

Same pose as before they try to attack and are ambushed by Trex at the end of the fist film. Same animation. Watch as they both back off. It's the same approaching animation but in reverse. Clever place holder images I'm sure. I'm almost positive. What do you guys think?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Nov 24, 2014, 10:18:15 AM
Yeah, I noticed that too.  It really does look the same, but maybe that's because of the video quality.  For all we know, they could've reanimated the entire pose (a pose all raptors might do before they strike).  I don't think it's necessarily a placeholder - wouldn't that itself be work, to crop that from the original movie and fit it in? 

edit: Did a side by side comparison and they look so damn identical (the wrinkles on the bottom of the neck) you're probably right about the placeholder business.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Nov 24, 2014, 11:12:25 AM
They might be placeholders. It's workprint footage after all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Nov 24, 2014, 11:51:01 AM
Although excited my first impression is that the cgi, to me doesn't look very good.

Spoiler
And Raptors backing away from a human? Wtf.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: coolbreeze on Nov 24, 2014, 11:53:09 AM
Quote from: Taxemic on Nov 24, 2014, 11:51:01 AM
Although excited my first impression is that the cgi, to me doesn't look very good.

Spoiler
And Raptors backing away from a human? Wtf.
[close]

Do try and keep up... ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 24, 2014, 12:19:04 PM
I just dropped in to see what condition my condition was in.

In other words, just to say the teaser's teaser made me squeal. I'm really thrilled to know Gallimimus is making a return 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Nov 24, 2014, 01:31:04 PM
Quote from: coolbreeze on Nov 24, 2014, 11:53:09 AM
Quote from: Taxemic on Nov 24, 2014, 11:51:01 AM
Although excited my first impression is that the cgi, to me doesn't look very good.

Spoiler
And Raptors backing away from a human? Wtf.
[close]

Do try and keep up... ::)

Why? Because it's test footage? Even the teaser of the teaser looked a bit...like they spared some expense.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 24, 2014, 03:05:56 PM
They're, Gal... uh... uh, Galli... uh, Gallimimus!

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B3NxByKIEAEb4Fq.jpg:large)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Nov 24, 2014, 04:17:07 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Nov 24, 2014, 09:28:28 AM
Leaked fragments from a workprint (some shots are unfinished): http://movies.cosmicbooknews.com/content/jurassic-world-trailer-leaks-online (http://movies.cosmicbooknews.com/content/jurassic-world-trailer-leaks-online)

holy f**k holy f**k holy f**k

Spoiler
DAT f**kING MOSASAUR
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BISHOP 93 on Nov 24, 2014, 05:53:31 PM
Hope theres some practical effects going on too
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Nov 24, 2014, 05:56:57 PM
I couldn't help but watch that leaked stuff, and omg. I'm crying.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Nov 24, 2014, 09:14:36 PM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Nov 24, 2014, 09:28:28 AM
Leaked fragments from a workprint (some shots are unfinished): http://movies.cosmicbooknews.com/content/jurassic-world-trailer-leaks-online (http://movies.cosmicbooknews.com/content/jurassic-world-trailer-leaks-online)

They're offline! *cries* I didn't see them!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Nov 24, 2014, 09:42:58 PM
You can still watch (and download) it here, the raptors and brachiosaurs are stand ins for later effects (mind that the print was from october)

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_smCmTl4LdjZWZ1elo1aWIwSTg/view (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_smCmTl4LdjZWZ1elo1aWIwSTg/view)

The guy had two other clips of that trailer, in one of it showed the T-Rex, a turned around Gyrosphere and Pteranodons attacking the helicopter

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Foi59.tinypic.com%2F28iurno.jpg&hash=2260335a500e9068d1fd569cd5b9157a6ee1e0e8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 24, 2014, 09:56:00 PM
Pteranodons attacking the Helicopter makes me think that they're going yet again to recycle previous unused script ideas.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Nov 24, 2014, 10:38:48 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on Nov 24, 2014, 09:42:58 PM
You can still watch (and download) it here, the raptors and brachiosaurs are stand ins for later effects (mind that the print was from october)

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_smCmTl4LdjZWZ1elo1aWIwSTg/view (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_smCmTl4LdjZWZ1elo1aWIwSTg/view)

The guy had two other clips of that trailer, in one of it showed the T-Rex, a turned around Gyrosphere and Pteranodons attacking the helicopter

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Foi59.tinypic.com%2F28iurno.jpg&hash=2260335a500e9068d1fd569cd5b9157a6ee1e0e8)

Thank you so much!
Spoiler
The raptors backing down was a bit of a let down though...doesn't make sense Otherwise it looked AMAZING!At least the raptor looked like the JP1 design. I can't find the Tyrannosaurus or Pteranodon though
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Nov 25, 2014, 03:17:05 AM
I missed it! Sunnuva b- that's what I get for playing Halo 2 all day.
Is the google drive link not working for anyone else, or is it just me?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 25, 2014, 05:13:43 PM
FULL OFFICIAL TRAILER FOR JURASSIC WORLD.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFinNxS5KN4 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFinNxS5KN4)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Nov 25, 2014, 05:14:07 PM
It's not just you.

Jurassic World Facebook page dropped the trailer 11 minutes ago (do you guys think they posted it early because of the leaked clips?)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SILeO8m7uvU#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SILeO8m7uvU#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 25, 2014, 05:15:58 PM
Goosebumps and tears. Goosebumps...and tears :')
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 25, 2014, 05:17:05 PM
Velociraptor + Starlord Team up for the win.  8) ;D :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 25, 2014, 05:20:17 PM
So, I was unable to avoid hearing about the D.Rex being in the film, but, my suspicions were correct: hybrid dinosaur. I'm OK with that because it fits perfectly within this film's universe.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Nov 25, 2014, 05:24:17 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Nov 25, 2014, 05:17:05 PM
Velociraptor + Starlord Team up for the win.  8) ;D :D

That shit was tight. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 25, 2014, 05:26:23 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 25, 2014, 05:20:17 PM
So, I was unable to avoid hearing about the D.Rex being in the film, but, my suspicions were correct: hybrid dinosaur. I'm OK with that because it fits perfectly within this film's universe.

Do you want to know what it's a hybrid of? :P

Spoiler
Snake + Cuttlefish + T-Rex + Velociraptor... and it's an albino with red eyes... here's the lego toy:
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.kinja-img.com%2Fgawker-media%2Fimage%2Fupload%2Fs--_BmDu8Mb--%2Fc_fit%2Cfl_progressive%2Cq_80%2Cw_636%2Fqwacwbagrf63qtarhysq.jpg&hash=7ce6d59198b60ccdf6b82bea48e6bef74350a49e)
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 25, 2014, 05:27:34 PM
^ DON'T TEMPT ME!!!!!!

Quote from: First Blood on Nov 25, 2014, 05:24:17 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Nov 25, 2014, 05:17:05 PM
Velociraptor + Starlord Team up for the win.  8) ;D :D

That shit was tight. :D

See, as nuts as it looked, I'm willing to accept that they were engineered to behave that way. It actually doesn't look as crazy as I thought it would when people were talking about it a decade ago.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 25, 2014, 05:29:19 PM
Cool.

Don't know if I'm 100% sold, but cool. I just saw Chris Pratt riding a motorcycle surrounded by Raptors. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 25, 2014, 05:30:26 PM
And i still cant believe we are gonna see THAT on film. ;D

Sequel to this will probably be a straight up adaptation of the old Sayles script with more genetically engineered hybrids. :P eh.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Nov 25, 2014, 05:30:38 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Nov 25, 2014, 05:13:43 PM
FULL OFFICIAL TRAILER FOR JURASSIC WORLD.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFinNxS5KN4 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFinNxS5KN4)

I was tripping when i checked my Facebook feed and saw that they had released the trailer  :o Trained raptors is pretty cool but I want them to be baddies as well :/

Aside from that, omg I want to cry tears of joy. It's amazing seeing the park open  :'( The scene with the Mosasaur made me lose my mind!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: viendammage on Nov 25, 2014, 05:40:26 PM
I liked the set up but the story of a hybrid killer dinosaur on the loose just sounds really schlocky to me...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 25, 2014, 05:41:13 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Nov 25, 2014, 05:30:26 PM
And i still cant believe we are gonna see THAT on film. ;D

Sequel to this will probably be a straight up adaptation of the old Sayles script with more genetically engineered hybrids. :P eh.

You mean the human-dino hybrids?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 25, 2014, 05:43:56 PM
Awesome. 8) And was that Miranda Otto at the beginning?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Nov 25, 2014, 05:46:06 PM
That brief scene that showed Bryce Howard standing with the flare, felt like a tribute to both Aliens and the original Jurassic Park. Looked great  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 25, 2014, 05:46:48 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Nov 25, 2014, 05:43:56 PM
Awesome. 8) And was that Miranda Otto at the beginning?

No, Judy Greer.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Nov 25, 2014, 05:47:48 PM
Hamada is probably gonna be this movies Muldoon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 25, 2014, 05:48:08 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 25, 2014, 05:46:48 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Nov 25, 2014, 05:43:56 PM
Awesome. 8) And was that Miranda Otto at the beginning?

No, Judy Greer.

Ah.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Nov 25, 2014, 05:59:31 PM
Jurassic Park and Star Wars return. People's gonna be happy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 25, 2014, 06:00:23 PM
2015 is going to be a huge year for Hollywood. Perhaps the biggest in a while.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Nov 25, 2014, 06:03:26 PM
I'm so happy oh my god

as worried as i was about this raptor issue

im so okay with it after seeing it

im crying
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Nov 25, 2014, 06:07:08 PM
Everything is awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on Nov 25, 2014, 06:11:04 PM
pet-raptors...  ::)

Apart from that shit, pretty decent looking... the cut of the trailer was fairly sloppy though... various inconsistent music all over the place.

Loved the Mosasaurus part.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Nov 25, 2014, 06:12:03 PM
Yeah...trained Raptors? Really? Everyone's just cool with that?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Nov 25, 2014, 06:14:56 PM
Quote from: Taxemic on Nov 25, 2014, 06:12:03 PM
Yeah...trained Raptors? Really? Everyone's just cool with that?

They could've genetically altered the raptors with perhaps Dog DNA to give them some obedience, or perhaps his character just has been with them since they hatched and rather then listen to him like a dog they kind of have a mutual agreement or respect for one another. I wouldn't be surprised if at some point they turn on him.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Nov 25, 2014, 06:18:48 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Nov 25, 2014, 06:14:56 PM
Quote from: Taxemic on Nov 25, 2014, 06:12:03 PM
Yeah...trained Raptors? Really? Everyone's just cool with that?

They could've genetically altered the raptors with perhaps Dog DNA to give them some obedience, or perhaps his character just has been with them since they hatched and rather then listen to him like a dog they kind of have a mutual agreement or respect for one another. I wouldn't be surprised if at some point they turn on him.

I guess  :-\

Then why not splice all the dinos with dog dna and further reduce danger? If there's trained raptors, then everything could be trained surely? I don't know. As much as I hate myself for saying this, I'm not sold. Yet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Nov 25, 2014, 06:22:41 PM
Quote from: Taxemic on Nov 25, 2014, 06:18:48 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Nov 25, 2014, 06:14:56 PM
Quote from: Taxemic on Nov 25, 2014, 06:12:03 PM
Yeah...trained Raptors? Really? Everyone's just cool with that?

They could've genetically altered the raptors with perhaps Dog DNA to give them some obedience, or perhaps his character just has been with them since they hatched and rather then listen to him like a dog they kind of have a mutual agreement or respect for one another. I wouldn't be surprised if at some point they turn on him.

I guess  :-\

Then why not splice all the dinos with dog dna and further reduce danger? If there's trained raptors, then everything could be trained surely? I don't know. As much as I hate myself for saying this, I'm not sold. Yet.

Well, I know they said Owen (Chris Pratt) studies the behaviors of the Raptors, which means he's worked with them for a long time. I doubt they're trained, but they are animals, we don't know if Raptors attacked everything on sight. I have faith that they will give good reasons as to why they aren't ripping him apart there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Nov 25, 2014, 06:23:38 PM
I cried hysterically!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Nov 25, 2014, 06:24:07 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Nov 25, 2014, 06:03:26 PM
I'm so happy oh my god

as worried as i was about this raptor issue

im so okay with it after seeing it

im crying

its still not over. Star Wars trailer Friday
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Nov 25, 2014, 06:24:57 PM
Now I want a dinosaur on Guardians of the Galaxy 2.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Nov 25, 2014, 06:27:04 PM
Quote from: First Blood on Nov 25, 2014, 06:24:07 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Nov 25, 2014, 06:03:26 PM
I'm so happy oh my god

as worried as i was about this raptor issue

im so okay with it after seeing it

im crying

its still not over. Star Wars trailer Friday

I know, this week is too much for me.

but JP has a special place in my heart, I was born in 93' and once I got a little older the first movie I remembered watching was Jurassic Park, and wow, ever since then I was a dinosaur freak from like age 3 and up, this movie is special to me.

but star wars is just as good, because, well, everybody grew up with star wars.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Nov 25, 2014, 06:28:03 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Nov 25, 2014, 06:22:41 PM
Quote from: Taxemic on Nov 25, 2014, 06:18:48 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Nov 25, 2014, 06:14:56 PM
Quote from: Taxemic on Nov 25, 2014, 06:12:03 PM
Yeah...trained Raptors? Really? Everyone's just cool with that?

They could've genetically altered the raptors with perhaps Dog DNA to give them some obedience, or perhaps his character just has been with them since they hatched and rather then listen to him like a dog they kind of have a mutual agreement or respect for one another. I wouldn't be surprised if at some point they turn on him.

I guess  :-\

Then why not splice all the dinos with dog dna and further reduce danger? If there's trained raptors, then everything could be trained surely? I don't know. As much as I hate myself for saying this, I'm not sold. Yet.

Well, I know they said Owen (Chris Pratt) studies the behaviors of the Raptors, which means he's worked with them for a long time. I doubt they're trained, but they are animals, we don't know if Raptors attacked everything on sight. I have faith that they will give good reasons as to why they aren't ripping him apart there.

I've found faith in your faith. Thanks.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 25, 2014, 06:28:46 PM
Even more pumped. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Nov 25, 2014, 06:34:16 PM
Komodo dragons can be trained and they're for sure less intelligent than motherf**king raptors. Think of them as tigers.

And yeah, this looks gewd. I wish some of the sequences from the leaked workprint made it into this trailer though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 25, 2014, 06:43:13 PM
At first I thought the shark was a Megalodon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Nov 25, 2014, 06:44:16 PM
Spoiler

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F38.media.tumblr.com%2Fe293ccf15172ef5af9aab085b5da4344%2Ftumblr_nflx08xIOe1r1x4nlo1_500.gif&hash=04281f05d9c32e4d5b2e6f1dffc06bc77936669b)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Nov 25, 2014, 06:46:45 PM
We need D-Rex gif.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Nov 25, 2014, 06:48:43 PM
It's not unbelievable to think you can train a raptor. They're still animals, if you raise a raptor from birth whose to say it wouldn't bond with you?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Nov 25, 2014, 06:51:36 PM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Nov 25, 2014, 06:48:43 PM
It's not unbelievable to think you can train a raptor. They're still animals, if you raise a raptor from birth whose to say it wouldn't bond with you?
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjpencyclopedia%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F03%2Fmuldoon2.png&hash=d70e8f1fb8bdc8fe566b1f717a555abd68175938)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 25, 2014, 06:57:43 PM
inb4 a reference in the new film to Muldoon being a prick that mistreated the raptors.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 25, 2014, 07:00:42 PM
I don't think I can quite express what I am feeling right now, but I think that

FUUUUUUU UUUUUFIBVJEN VOKEDMVO RFNINVONFBLWSKVNKDJN VBSEIK FEFN F EIUBWREN  3ERIRG WEIFB WK FJW FUIWE FKJENOIGNREJF  OWNFKJS  OWENBFKJDSD F OWENFOI  JWGBABDLNEEGLKN R EDKCFNW EIUBFWE NFK FIWEUBGW


would be most accurate.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Nov 25, 2014, 07:03:49 PM
It would be pretty awesome if they kill the D-Rex by Mosasaur  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Nov 25, 2014, 07:06:31 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 25, 2014, 06:00:23 PM
2015 is going to be a huge year for Hollywood. Perhaps the biggest in a while.
Mad Max? :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Nov 25, 2014, 07:08:02 PM
Quote from: Taxemic on Nov 25, 2014, 06:51:36 PM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Nov 25, 2014, 06:48:43 PM
It's not unbelievable to think you can train a raptor. They're still animals, if you raise a raptor from birth whose to say it wouldn't bond with you?
http://www.jplegacy.org/jpencyclopedia/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/muldoon2.png

Did Muldoon actually train and nurture them from birth? He was the game warden.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 25, 2014, 07:08:27 PM
He didn't.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 25, 2014, 07:10:19 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Nov 25, 2014, 06:57:43 PM
inb4 a reference in the new film to Muldoon being a prick that mistreated the raptors.

When did he mistreat them?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Nov 25, 2014, 07:11:39 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 25, 2014, 07:10:19 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Nov 25, 2014, 06:57:43 PM
inb4 a reference in the new film to Muldoon being a prick that mistreated the raptors.

When did he mistreat them?
When he placed them in a tiny enclosure for their adult lives.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 25, 2014, 07:17:14 PM
Was that his idea? I don't recall it being mentioned in the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 25, 2014, 07:20:38 PM
It wasnt.

Might be expanded upon in the "new" film.. or not.

We'll find out soon how they are training them raptors. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Nov 25, 2014, 07:27:51 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Nov 25, 2014, 07:03:49 PM
It would be pretty awesome if they kill the D-Rex by Mosasaur  :laugh:

Oh shit, that would be so f**king rad. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Nov 25, 2014, 07:38:44 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Nov 25, 2014, 06:14:56 PM
Quote from: Taxemic on Nov 25, 2014, 06:12:03 PM
Yeah...trained Raptors? Really? Everyone's just cool with that?

They could've genetically altered the raptors with perhaps Dog DNA to give them some obedience, or perhaps his character just has been with them since they hatched and rather then listen to him like a dog they kind of have a mutual agreement or respect for one another. I wouldn't be surprised if at some point they turn on him.

It's not credibility that's the problem. You can train any remotely intelligent animal to treat a human as part of the family if you hand-raise them from birth.
As far as I'm concerned, the problem is how it's going to come across. Just as they don't want to show real coelurosaurs because they're not what the unwashed masses are expecting to see, we've been conditioned to see the raptors as insatiable killing machines - it may not sit well to see them having strokies and chud-chuds, and obeying commands to get treaties.

Anyway. The Apatosaurus and Stegosaurus look great. Not sure what's going on with that mosasaur, it looks bigger than Liam Neeson's cock.
Film itself looks about what I was expecting; not Crichton-tier but could be good fun.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 25, 2014, 07:41:46 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Nov 25, 2014, 07:27:51 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Nov 25, 2014, 07:03:49 PM
It would be pretty awesome if they kill the D-Rex by Mosasaur  :laugh:

Oh shit, that would be so f**king rad. :laugh:
Anything with that thing will be rad.

Quote from: Vertigo on Nov 25, 2014, 07:38:44 PM
Not sure what's going on with that mosasaur, it looks bigger than Liam Neeson's cock.
If you stop the trailer when it opens its mouth, you'll see it has pharyngeal jaws.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Nov 25, 2014, 07:51:00 PM
They could get super dark and gritty and have the mosasaur escape and devour boats as the visitors try to escape.  8)

i'm just so happy they've finally included a marine dinosaur, I want it to be in the movie a lot, not just that quick scene.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Nov 25, 2014, 08:06:11 PM
Can we please have a badass game warden in this? I want to see a dinosaur get bazookaed....
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 25, 2014, 08:36:16 PM
You will see a dinosaur getting shot by a chaingun... in a helicopter, though. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Nov 25, 2014, 08:43:05 PM
So who else wants to go kayaking with Stegosauruses. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Nov 25, 2014, 08:52:53 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Nov 25, 2014, 07:38:44 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Nov 25, 2014, 06:14:56 PM
Quote from: Taxemic on Nov 25, 2014, 06:12:03 PM
Yeah...trained Raptors? Really? Everyone's just cool with that?

They could've genetically altered the raptors with perhaps Dog DNA to give them some obedience, or perhaps his character just has been with them since they hatched and rather then listen to him like a dog they kind of have a mutual agreement or respect for one another. I wouldn't be surprised if at some point they turn on him.

It's not credibility that's the problem. You can train any remotely intelligent animal to treat a human as part of the family if you hand-raise them from birth.
As far as I'm concerned, the problem is how it's going to come across. Just as they don't want to show real coelurosaurs because they're not what the unwashed masses are expecting to see, we've been conditioned to see the raptors as insatiable killing machines - it may not sit well to see them having strokies and chud-chuds, and obeying commands to get treaties.

Anyway. The Apatosaurus and Stegosaurus look great. Not sure what's going on with that mosasaur, it looks bigger than Liam Neeson's cock.
Film itself looks about what I was expecting; not Crichton-tier but could be good fun.

lol yeah, that Mosasaurus looks bigger than a Megalodon. It seems comparable to Liopleurodon from Walking With Dinosaur (although there was also an exaggeration in this documentary).

With respect to the trailer, it´s okay. But I like to see a balance between practical effects and CGI :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Nov 25, 2014, 09:48:35 PM
Hope we get a Dilophosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Nov 25, 2014, 10:02:41 PM
Quote from: Taxemic on Nov 25, 2014, 09:48:35 PM
Hope we get a Dilophosaurus.

*bangs window*

Daaaamn.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master on Nov 25, 2014, 10:28:40 PM
It's very cool nonetheless,  still I don't buy trained raptors.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Nov 25, 2014, 10:54:20 PM
Yeah, the trailer didn't have the scene of Pratt calming the raptors down, the chaingun shooting at something, and that shot of the D-Rex (I think?) smacking someone to the side.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 25, 2014, 10:59:56 PM
Quote from: Crazy Shrimp on Nov 25, 2014, 08:52:53 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Nov 25, 2014, 07:38:44 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Nov 25, 2014, 06:14:56 PM
Quote from: Taxemic on Nov 25, 2014, 06:12:03 PM
Yeah...trained Raptors? Really? Everyone's just cool with that?

They could've genetically altered the raptors with perhaps Dog DNA to give them some obedience, or perhaps his character just has been with them since they hatched and rather then listen to him like a dog they kind of have a mutual agreement or respect for one another. I wouldn't be surprised if at some point they turn on him.

It's not credibility that's the problem. You can train any remotely intelligent animal to treat a human as part of the family if you hand-raise them from birth.
As far as I'm concerned, the problem is how it's going to come across. Just as they don't want to show real coelurosaurs because they're not what the unwashed masses are expecting to see, we've been conditioned to see the raptors as insatiable killing machines - it may not sit well to see them having strokies and chud-chuds, and obeying commands to get treaties.

Anyway. The Apatosaurus and Stegosaurus look great. Not sure what's going on with that mosasaur, it looks bigger than Liam Neeson's cock.
Film itself looks about what I was expecting; not Crichton-tier but could be good fun.

lol yeah, that Mosasaurus looks bigger than a Megalodon. It seems comparable to Liopleurodon from Walking With Dinosaur (although there was also an exaggeration in this documentary).

With respect to the trailer, it´s okay. But I like to see a balance between practical effects and CGI :D

Giant mosasaurs grew up to 60 feet long, plus the camera angle might also be part of the reason it looks so enormous.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Nov 25, 2014, 11:44:52 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 25, 2014, 10:59:56 PM
Quote from: Crazy Shrimp on Nov 25, 2014, 08:52:53 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Nov 25, 2014, 07:38:44 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Nov 25, 2014, 06:14:56 PM
Quote from: Taxemic on Nov 25, 2014, 06:12:03 PM
Yeah...trained Raptors? Really? Everyone's just cool with that?

They could've genetically altered the raptors with perhaps Dog DNA to give them some obedience, or perhaps his character just has been with them since they hatched and rather then listen to him like a dog they kind of have a mutual agreement or respect for one another. I wouldn't be surprised if at some point they turn on him.

It's not credibility that's the problem. You can train any remotely intelligent animal to treat a human as part of the family if you hand-raise them from birth.
As far as I'm concerned, the problem is how it's going to come across. Just as they don't want to show real coelurosaurs because they're not what the unwashed masses are expecting to see, we've been conditioned to see the raptors as insatiable killing machines - it may not sit well to see them having strokies and chud-chuds, and obeying commands to get treaties.

Anyway. The Apatosaurus and Stegosaurus look great. Not sure what's going on with that mosasaur, it looks bigger than Liam Neeson's cock.
Film itself looks about what I was expecting; not Crichton-tier but could be good fun.

lol yeah, that Mosasaurus looks bigger than a Megalodon. It seems comparable to Liopleurodon from Walking With Dinosaur (although there was also an exaggeration in this documentary).

With respect to the trailer, it´s okay. But I like to see a balance between practical effects and CGI :D

Giant mosasaurs grew up to 60 feet long, plus the camera angle might also be part of the reason it looks so enormous.

Well, that explains everything. TY :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Nov 25, 2014, 11:45:47 PM
Also, frog DNA.

This looks both spectacular and amazingly cliched and cheezy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Nov 26, 2014, 12:10:45 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.bloody-disgusting.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F11%2Fjurassic-world-bryce-dallas-howard-1.jpg&hash=95c1dc085743f9aca76631cddba4de024e8e492a)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.bloody-disgusting.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F11%2Fjurassic-world-chris-pratt-bryce-dallas-howard.jpg&hash=eab0253d43a500ffda5aa1c0b4a9c9b3117db6de)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 26, 2014, 12:16:53 AM
Watched the trailer again. It worked better for me the second time. Looking forward to this. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Nov 26, 2014, 12:21:55 AM
I've been watching it all day to be honest.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Nov 26, 2014, 12:22:51 AM
Just for reference:

Mosasaur screencap
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi58.tinypic.com%2F2uh4j08.jpg&hash=752952b2dbf9cb65969b3b7062165096da13da47)
[close]

How long would you say those jaws look? I'd say just over 5 metres (~17 feet), using the handler on the platform (who may be slightly further away) for scale.

The biggest known mosasaur skulls had jaw lengths of 1.5 metres, making this chappy on a whole other level of magnitude.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 26, 2014, 12:27:35 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Nov 25, 2014, 07:38:44 PM
Film itself looks about what I was expecting; not Crichton-tier but could be good fun.

Most of the ideas presented in the new film are from Crichton himself. ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Nov 26, 2014, 12:34:45 AM
Love how Pratt is in a serious role here, not the comic relief or goof he's known for. He looks like he could pull it off.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 26, 2014, 12:35:15 AM
But will he get Muldoon's rocket launcher from the book?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Nov 26, 2014, 12:36:21 AM
Quote from: MudButt on Nov 26, 2014, 12:34:45 AM
Love how Pratt is in a serious role here, not the comic relief or goof he's known for. He looks like he could pull it off.

I couldn't help but sn***er at him being "serious".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 26, 2014, 12:37:40 AM
Quote from: SM on Nov 26, 2014, 12:36:21 AM
I couldn't help but sn***er at him being "serious".

snicker ???

Why *** that out? :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Nov 26, 2014, 12:38:26 AM
Quote from: SM on Nov 26, 2014, 12:36:21 AM
Quote from: MudButt on Nov 26, 2014, 12:34:45 AM
Love how Pratt is in a serious role here, not the comic relief or goof he's known for. He looks like he could pull it off.

I couldn't help but sn***er at him being "serious".

Not that I mind, but I wonder if there is a reason for his serious demeanor throughout, plot wise.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Nov 26, 2014, 12:40:25 AM
Quote from: MudButt on Nov 26, 2014, 12:21:55 AM
I've been watching it all day to be honest.
Now I'm just waiting the moment Jeremy Jahns upload his "trailer review" saying "looks awesome" every 5 seconds, as well as "I like Chris Pratt!".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Nov 26, 2014, 12:40:59 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Nov 26, 2014, 12:38:26 AM
Quote from: SM on Nov 26, 2014, 12:36:21 AM
Quote from: MudButt on Nov 26, 2014, 12:34:45 AM
Love how Pratt is in a serious role here, not the comic relief or goof he's known for. He looks like he could pull it off.

I couldn't help but sn***er at him being "serious".

Not that I mind, but I wonder if there is a reason for his serious demeanor throughout, plot wise.

I know his character description said he was ''rugged, ex-military man.''.

Quote from: Magegg on Nov 26, 2014, 12:40:25 AM
Quote from: MudButt on Nov 26, 2014, 12:21:55 AM
I've been watching it all day to be honest.
Now I'm just waiting the moment Jeremy Jahns upload his "trailer review" saying "looks awesome" every 5 seconds, as well as "I like Chris Pratt!".

is that right
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 26, 2014, 12:41:20 AM
Who's to say he isn't going to be comedic at some points? We only saw a few sequences with him...

And he was driving a motorcycle with raptors. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Nov 26, 2014, 12:42:27 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 26, 2014, 12:41:20 AM
Who's to say he isn't going to be comedic at some points? We only saw a few sequences with him...

And he was driving a motorcycle with raptors. :D

well that's true, but still, from what his facial expressions the way he delivered his lines, I wouldn't mind the seriousness throughout the movie.

but hey Jake Johnson is in this movie and he'll get the comedic lines just you watch
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Nov 26, 2014, 12:43:13 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 26, 2014, 12:37:40 AM
Quote from: SM on Nov 26, 2014, 12:36:21 AM
I couldn't help but sn***er at him being "serious".

snicker ???

Why *** that out? :D

s-n-i-g-g-e-r

How odd.  f**k the Polish, but the n-word gets censored, even when it's not really the n-word.  :laugh:

QuoteNot that I mind, but I wonder if there is a reason for his serious demeanor throughout, plot wise.

He's playing the Sam Neill role (or Jeff Goldblum from Lost World).  Except he has a gun.  Hope all the cliches have been spent in the trailer, 'cos a whole film of him like that spells comedy gold.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Nov 26, 2014, 12:48:18 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 26, 2014, 12:27:35 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Nov 25, 2014, 07:38:44 PM
Film itself looks about what I was expecting; not Crichton-tier but could be good fun.

Most of the ideas presented in the new film are from Crichton himself. ::)

...Ideas which are already intrinsic to the franchise. It's not grounded in science, it doesn't look particularly deep or technical, and it doesn't seem to have anything particularly fresh or insightful to say. Can't say for sure until the film comes out, but that's how it looks for now - another fun action romp with increasingly less realistic Mesozoic recreations.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Nov 26, 2014, 12:51:52 AM
I love the park setting. It looks like the early 70's science fiction concept art of Disney's Epcot Center.
I love the Allan Malcom Muldoon. He's a dinosaur lover, a rock star, and a big game specialist rolled into one.
I love Ron Howards Daughter with all my heart.
Kid from Iron Man 3 has rad hair.
I love Godzilla's auto tuned roar every time they fade to black after saying something epic.  :laugh:

Looks absolutely fun as hell. I'm there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 26, 2014, 01:04:51 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Nov 26, 2014, 12:22:51 AM
Just for reference:

Mosasaur screencap
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi58.tinypic.com%2F2uh4j08.jpg&hash=752952b2dbf9cb65969b3b7062165096da13da47)
[close]

How long would you say those jaws look? I'd say just over 5 metres (~17 feet), using the handler on the platform (who may be slightly further away) for scale.

The biggest known mosasaur skulls had jaw lengths of 1.5 metres, making this chappy on a whole other level of magnitude.

Again, camera-angles dude. There were times in the original JP when the Rex head looked like it was nine feet long.

I would complain about the CG looking unfinished, but people said that about the second Godzilla trailer (when he emerges from the water) but of course that was fixed for the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Nov 26, 2014, 01:18:03 AM
Sure, nine feet, but not sixteen.....
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 26, 2014, 01:24:12 AM
My point is that it may very well just the way the camera is positioned. Besides, for all I know, larger mosasaurids like Hainosaurus might've had a larger skull than T.Rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Nov 26, 2014, 01:24:44 AM
The Great White also makes it likely that this is an oversized Mosasaur.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Nov 26, 2014, 01:37:41 AM
...

Is this a documentary?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Nov 26, 2014, 01:41:29 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 26, 2014, 01:24:12 AM
My point is that it may very well just the way the camera is positioned. Besides, for all I know, larger mosasaurids like Hainosaurus might've had a larger skull than T.Rex.

That's not what I mean, perspective doesn't account for a threefold increase in length.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: T Dog on Nov 26, 2014, 01:48:58 AM
Gotta be honest, that trailer in no way made me want to go see that movie.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 26, 2014, 01:57:56 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Nov 26, 2014, 01:41:29 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 26, 2014, 01:24:12 AM
My point is that it may very well just the way the camera is positioned. Besides, for all I know, larger mosasaurids like Hainosaurus might've had a larger skull than T.Rex.

That's not what I mean, perspective doesn't account for a threefold increase in length.

What about the possibility that the skull is just that large combined with the camera?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Nov 26, 2014, 04:47:01 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dk6kJGU_Qng#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dk6kJGU_Qng#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alienseseses on Nov 26, 2014, 05:02:58 AM
I kind of love the idea of them making a new hybrid dinosaur.

Because I saw a description saying "I bet they added this because the studio said you need to have a supermonster to sell this movie because nobody is excited by regular dinosaurs anymore"

and

if that's literally part of the story? The park saying, tourists are getting blase about dinosaurs, we need to attract them? That would be some great commentary on our current relationship with movie magic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Nov 26, 2014, 05:05:23 AM
definite play on the way those execs probably think, nobody wants a shark movie, they want a laser shark movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 26, 2014, 05:21:33 AM
Quote from: MudButt on Nov 26, 2014, 05:05:23 AM
definite play on the way those execs probably think, nobody wants a shark movie, they want a laser shark movie.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-kaZ5l-Hx2yA%2FToU0wka2KvI%2FAAAAAAAADC4%2FTx6CV7SLKpE%2Fs1600%2Fsharkslaser.jpg&hash=0301e7c693e70a3efd6fc650b286ddb2f8cd329b)

Dr. Evil confirmed for head of the company behind Jurassic World.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HappyAlien on Nov 26, 2014, 06:18:04 AM
I liked that they finally included a marine creature. You would have thought that after three incidents they would have decided against creating meat eating dinosaurs that always go on a rampage killing people.
Not so sure if the Hybrid is going to be any good, I was one of the few people who actually didn't mind the aborted human-dino hybrid designs they had on the net. I thought they were pretty creepy and could be good if used properly in the film.
Jeff Goldblum could return as Brundlesaur!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SpaceMarines on Nov 26, 2014, 06:27:17 AM
I'm just curious how a mosquito got on that aquatic motherf**ker.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Nov 26, 2014, 06:29:18 AM
I'm pretty excited... with some caution.

I don't want to bitch about the Hybrid thing or the Velociraptor guard dog thing yet... but they at the very least make me go "Ummmmm..." and then ask questions.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: markweatherill on Nov 26, 2014, 06:29:54 AM
But this is just a remake of Jurassic Park with everything bigger except the actors salaries.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Wrecktangle on Nov 26, 2014, 06:31:46 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Nov 26, 2014, 04:47:01 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dk6kJGU_Qng#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dk6kJGU_Qng#ws)

"Review"  ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 26, 2014, 06:32:33 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Nov 26, 2014, 06:27:17 AM
I'm just curious how a mosquito got on that aquatic motherf**ker.

They genetically engineered a special aquatic mosquito and sent that f**ker back in time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Nov 26, 2014, 06:36:11 AM
The trailer looks great. The Avengers 2 and Jurassic World are my two biggest summer movie for me next year.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Nov 26, 2014, 07:22:29 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Nov 26, 2014, 06:32:33 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Nov 26, 2014, 06:27:17 AM
I'm just curious how a mosquito got on that aquatic motherf**ker.

They genetically engineered a special aquatic mosquito and sent that f**ker back in time.

"Mr Hammond - why don't we just use the time machine and bring a dinosaur back with us?"

"Because shut up! Don't you know anything about science??  Geez, send back the f**king mosquito already.  f**king amateurs..."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Nov 26, 2014, 07:26:01 AM
I'm amazed! JJ thinks the movie may just be a rehash!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dk6kJGU_Qng#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dk6kJGU_Qng#ws)

Sounds like a Godzilla type monster movie to me, hybrid? meh.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on Nov 26, 2014, 08:11:14 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Nov 25, 2014, 06:34:16 PM
Komodo dragons can be trained and they're for sure less intelligent than motherf**king raptors. Think of them as tigers.

And yeah, this looks gewd. I wish some of the sequences from the leaked workprint made it into this trailer though.

Yes, trained to eat food at certain time in a certain place, not to be your personal hunting-pet.

"Cause yeah, hunting with Komodo Dragons is so normal." Where the hell do you get these idea from?

A reptile may have a cognitive brain function, but they are the slowest, most irritable learners in the animal kingdom, the only thing worse are fish. There's a reason why our ancestors trained mammals and didn't go around trying to tame a f**king crocodile.
But that's beside the point, on a factual note: a reptile/fish/bird cannot differentiate between faces of different human beings.

Even a tiger can never be fully trained to suit your command. Not for the next 500 years at least. The reason why the dog has become so docile and loyal is because it has now been in it's genes for hundreds, thousands of years. It's even difficult to train cats and cats are fairly smart creatures.

Point being: Don't try to tell me that it's a plausible idea to train a raptor, it simply isn't.

I like the JP series because it's science fiction and that genre has to take liberties in storytelling. That doesn't mean those ideas aren't sometimes f**king ludicrous. And on an ending note, a dumb idea can remain a dumb idea, even in a science fiction movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alienseseses on Nov 26, 2014, 08:14:59 AM
Technically, they're closer to birds than reptiles.

And they're all dead. And they were much smaller in real life, and had feathers.

These raptors are fiction. If the filmmakers say you can train them, I can't prove them wrong with science.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on Nov 26, 2014, 08:40:53 AM
Quote from: Alienseseses on Nov 26, 2014, 08:14:59 AM
Technically, they're closer to birds than reptiles.

And they're all dead. And they were much smaller in real life, and had feathers.

These raptors are fiction. If the filmmakers say you can train them, I can't prove them wrong with science.

Yes, doesn't negate it's stupidity though.

Difference between birds and reptiles lies in various places, but not in their brain, same cognitive abilities.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Nov 26, 2014, 08:44:03 AM
Quote from: Tangakkai on Nov 26, 2014, 08:11:14 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Nov 25, 2014, 06:34:16 PM
Komodo dragons can be trained and they're for sure less intelligent than motherf**king raptors. Think of them as tigers.

And yeah, this looks gewd. I wish some of the sequences from the leaked workprint made it into this trailer though.

Yes, trained to eat food at certain time in a certain place, not to be your personal hunting-pet.

"Cause yeah, hunting with Komodo Dragons is so normal." Where the hell do you get these idea from?

A reptile may have a cognitive brain function, but they are the slowest, most irritable learners in the animal kingdom, the only thing worse are fish. There's a reason why our ancestors trained mammals and didn't go around trying to tame a f**king crocodile.
But that's beside the point, on a factual note: a reptile/fish/bird cannot differentiate between faces of different human beings.

Even a tiger can never be fully trained to suit your command. Not for the next 500 years at least. The reason why the dog has become so docile and loyal is because it has now been in it's genes for hundreds, thousands of years. It's even difficult to train cats and cats are fairly smart creatures.

Point being: Don't try to tell me that it's a plausible idea to train a raptor, it simply isn't.

I like the JP series because it's science fiction and that genre has to take liberties in storytelling. That doesn't mean those ideas aren't sometimes f**king ludicrous. And on an ending note, a dumb idea can remain a dumb idea, even in a science fiction movie.

They're closer to avians, as mentioned before me. And I'm not sure if this still holds true but also some mammalian characteristics. Also, they are supposed to be incredibly intelligent, like dolphins. "Don't try to tell me it's a plausible idea to train a raptor, it simply isn't." It really isn't simple at all, which makes it more plausible than them being untrainable. Nor to mention you speak this as fact about an animal that nobody can possibly know how they truly behaved.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Nov 26, 2014, 08:53:13 AM
Guess what else is not plausible.

Cloning dinosaurs.

Why rage about scientific inaccuracies in a work of fiction? In fact, we don't even know if their trainability is accurate or not.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Nov 26, 2014, 09:16:00 AM
So this is Jaws III with dinosaurs basically.

And I'm guessing Star-Lord's raptors will save the day, taking down the D-Rex in a twist of the first film's ending (where the Rex chowed down on the raptor couple).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: jacc.90 on Nov 26, 2014, 09:49:44 AM
Quote from: Tangakkai on Nov 26, 2014, 08:11:14 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Nov 25, 2014, 06:34:16 PM
Komodo dragons can be trained and they're for sure less intelligent than motherf**king raptors. Think of them as tigers.

And yeah, this looks gewd. I wish some of the sequences from the leaked workprint made it into this trailer though.

Yes, trained to eat food at certain time in a certain place, not to be your personal hunting-pet.

"Cause yeah, hunting with Komodo Dragons is so normal." Where the hell do you get these idea from?

A reptile may have a cognitive brain function, but they are the slowest, most irritable learners in the animal kingdom, the only thing worse are fish. There's a reason why our ancestors trained mammals and didn't go around trying to tame a f**king crocodile.
But that's beside the point, on a factual note: a reptile/fish/bird cannot differentiate between faces of different human beings.

Even a tiger can never be fully trained to suit your command. Not for the next 500 years at least. The reason why the dog has become so docile and loyal is because it has now been in it's genes for hundreds, thousands of years. It's even difficult to train cats and cats are fairly smart creatures.

Point being: Don't try to tell me that it's a plausible idea to train a raptor, it simply isn't.

I like the JP series because it's science fiction and that genre has to take liberties in storytelling. That doesn't mean those ideas aren't sometimes f**king ludicrous. And on an ending note, a dumb idea can remain a dumb idea, even in a science fiction movie.

Because SCIENCE and GENETICS
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.quickmeme.com%2Fimg%2Fa7%2Fa7b108e8dca865d2972094197beaa7fedadf0c15f5298fd3f4aea36d2cbf1924.jpg&hash=8204b8e84aeb6c5706f7139935e1f7b7eeded9c4)(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.troll.me%2Fimages%2Fancient-aliens-guy%2Fgenetics.jpg&hash=421d06aed18383606671165a24c93e473f6538de)(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimageshack.com%2Fa%2Fimg910%2F3759%2FrziD6s.jpg&hash=7e035f1fdd50fefd67c8949cbd483d1ed4ae1333)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DaddyYautja on Nov 26, 2014, 09:55:31 AM
Quote from: Tangakkai on Nov 26, 2014, 08:11:14 AM
Quote from: scarhunter92 on Nov 25, 2014, 06:34:16 PM
Komodo dragons can be trained and they're for sure less intelligent than motherf**king raptors. Think of them as tigers.

And yeah, this looks gewd. I wish some of the sequences from the leaked workprint made it into this trailer though.

Yes, trained to eat food at certain time in a certain place, not to be your personal hunting-pet.

"Cause yeah, hunting with Komodo Dragons is so normal." Where the hell do you get these idea from?

A reptile may have a cognitive brain function, but they are the slowest, most irritable learners in the animal kingdom, the only thing worse are fish. There's a reason why our ancestors trained mammals and didn't go around trying to tame a f**king crocodile.
But that's beside the point, on a factual note: a reptile/fish/bird cannot differentiate between faces of different human beings.

Even a tiger can never be fully trained to suit your command. Not for the next 500 years at least. The reason why the dog has become so docile and loyal is because it has now been in it's genes for hundreds, thousands of years. It's even difficult to train cats and cats are fairly smart creatures.

Point being: Don't try to tell me that it's a plausible idea to train a raptor, it simply isn't.

I like the JP series because it's science fiction and that genre has to take liberties in storytelling. That doesn't mean those ideas aren't sometimes f**king ludicrous. And on an ending note, a dumb idea can remain a dumb idea, even in a science fiction movie.

It's possible.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PefKwpNynyc (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PefKwpNynyc)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on Nov 26, 2014, 10:00:36 AM
Quote from: bloodinthemud on Nov 26, 2014, 08:53:13 AM
Guess what else is not plausible.

Cloning dinosaurs.

Why rage about scientific inaccuracies in a work of fiction? In fact, we don't even know if their trainability is accurate or not.

Like i said, only because it's fiction, doesn't mean its ideas can't be stupid. We might not know, but certain observation of our fauna does enable us to deduct analogies/incosistencies in their behaviour. It's a dinosaur, it's not an alien species sent down from some spacecraft.

I love JP for a large part for its fiction. But that doesn't mean I'm not allowed to think of something as being a bad/nutty idea. There are things that I like (for example the liberties in size of the velociraptor that they took) and things I don't like, it's that simple. And yes, I do bring part of "science" into this, since they are still animals and not robots from the future (in which case we really wouldn't be able to predict, what their capabilities are, since AI has still got so much potential to evolve).

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Nov 26, 2014, 10:01:07 AM
Quote from: bloodinthemud on Nov 26, 2014, 08:53:13 AM
Guess what else is not plausible.

Cloning dinosaurs.

Why rage about scientific inaccuracies in a work of fiction? In fact, we don't even know if their trainability is accurate or not.

Main reason it's not possible is because we can't obtain undamaged dino DNA. There are other difficulties like the egg shells necessary for proper embryo growth, but all these things could be possible with future technology. And that's what this movie is and what the franchise has always been: sci-fi. So that's a whole separate issue to the trainable raptors debate.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Nov 26, 2014, 11:46:41 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Nov 26, 2014, 06:27:17 AM
I'm just curious how a mosquito got on that aquatic motherf**ker.
:laugh:
Quote from: KiramidHead on Nov 26, 2014, 06:32:33 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Nov 26, 2014, 06:27:17 AM
I'm just curious how a mosquito got on that aquatic motherf**ker.

They genetically engineered a special aquatic mosquito and sent that f**ker back in time.
:laugh:
Quote from: SM on Nov 26, 2014, 07:22:29 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Nov 26, 2014, 06:32:33 AM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Nov 26, 2014, 06:27:17 AM
I'm just curious how a mosquito got on that aquatic motherf**ker.

They genetically engineered a special aquatic mosquito and sent that f**ker back in time.

"Mr Hammond - why don't we just use the time machine and bring a dinosaur back with us?"

"Because shut up! Don't you know anything about science??  Geez, send back the f**king mosquito already.  f**king amateurs..."
;D
That might be the best string of posts I've seen on the internet in forever
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 26, 2014, 12:03:42 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Nov 26, 2014, 06:27:17 AM
I'm just curious how a mosquito got on that aquatic motherf**ker.

Old depictions of marine reptiles show (albeit plesiosaurs mostly) them coming up onto the shore to bask in the sun. I don't think mosasaurs did that, but if you want a semi-plausible explanation, there it is.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: T Dog on Nov 26, 2014, 01:26:42 PM
I think it's the hokey "THIS IS EPIC" music from the trailer that puts me off. It's unwarranted as there is nothing in the trailer we haven't seen before.

Chris Pratt's seriousness and line delivery is also a bit suspect.

In my opinion it's a bad trailer but I'm definitely not particularly interested in seeing this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: AvatarIII on Nov 26, 2014, 01:38:58 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 26, 2014, 01:04:51 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Nov 26, 2014, 12:22:51 AM
Just for reference:

Mosasaur screencap
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi58.tinypic.com%2F2uh4j08.jpg&hash=752952b2dbf9cb65969b3b7062165096da13da47)
[close]

How long would you say those jaws look? I'd say just over 5 metres (~17 feet), using the handler on the platform (who may be slightly further away) for scale.

The biggest known mosasaur skulls had jaw lengths of 1.5 metres, making this chappy on a whole other level of magnitude.

Again, camera-angles dude. There were times in the original JP when the Rex head looked like it was nine feet long.

I would complain about the CG looking unfinished, but people said that about the second Godzilla trailer (when he emerges from the water) but of course that was fixed for the film.

Using the shark as reference (you can't call camera angles on that) it looks to be about 5 meters of jaw length too. Adult Great Whites are about 4-5m long. I suppose that the shark may be an adolescent or not a Great White at all.

Perhaps it is a Porbeagle or Salmon Shark that looks kind of like a Great Whites but are only about 2.5m, that still puts the jaw length at around 3m, which is still twice as big as it should be.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Nov 26, 2014, 03:07:20 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 26, 2014, 12:03:42 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Nov 26, 2014, 06:27:17 AM
I'm just curious how a mosquito got on that aquatic motherf**ker.

Old depictions of marine reptiles show (albeit plesiosaurs mostly) them coming up onto the shore to bask in the sun. I don't think mosasaurs did that, but if you want a semi-plausible explanation, there it is.

Any rest or sleep they needed would have to be done at the surface, in order to breathe (we know at least one mosasaur had massive amounts of melanin along its back, which forms a natural sunscreen, suggesting they may have spent a LOT of time at the surface).
So a freshwater mosasaur might potentially be exposed to airborne parasites, if you assume it inhabited a swampy environment, and that a bug is able to penetrate its hide (which isn't really any different to the conceit the franchise already employs for dinosaurs).

...Though that does mean you'd have to imagine a mosasaur that's apparently the size of a fin whale, splashing around in a mangrove swamp.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 26, 2014, 03:16:20 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Nov 26, 2014, 03:07:20 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 26, 2014, 12:03:42 PM
Quote from: SpaceMarines on Nov 26, 2014, 06:27:17 AM
I'm just curious how a mosquito got on that aquatic motherf**ker.

Old depictions of marine reptiles show (albeit plesiosaurs mostly) them coming up onto the shore to bask in the sun. I don't think mosasaurs did that, but if you want a semi-plausible explanation, there it is.

Any rest or sleep they needed would have to be done at the surface, in order to breathe (we know at least one mosasaur had massive amounts of melanin along its back, which forms a natural sunscreen, suggesting they may have spent a LOT of time at the surface).
So a freshwater mosasaur might potentially be exposed to airborne parasites, if you assume it inhabited a swampy environment, and that a bug is able to penetrate its hide (which isn't really any different to the conceit the franchise already employs for dinosaurs).

...Though that does mean you'd have to imagine a mosasaur that's apparently the size of a fin whale, splashing around in a mangrove swamp.

Well if Walking With Beasts is any proof and Basilosaurus could do it, so could a Hainosaurus-sized mosasaur, lol.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: jacc.90 on Nov 26, 2014, 03:21:12 PM
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimageshack.com%2Fa%2Fimg661%2F8453%2FsPLU4Q.jpg&hash=3010dda3279a6e059c92042b6f660e7062b761a9)
[close]

OH... Morgan, my friend, I'll teach you something:

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimageshack.com%2Fa%2Fimg538%2F4706%2FACTGlZ.jpg&hash=8586353aa2f72db5a40e0bf26c0cb10ee11f381e)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Nov 26, 2014, 05:37:21 PM
The whole plot seems suspect to me, like why would you open up the park again after what happened? Then of course it all kicks off again sooooo...seems like a rehash.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 26, 2014, 05:42:42 PM
To everyone complaining about the story being predictable, unoriginal, yada yada yada...what were you expecting, exactly? There isn't a whole lot of room for this movie to go.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Nov 26, 2014, 05:49:20 PM
Quote from: Hubbs on Nov 26, 2014, 05:37:21 PM
The whole plot seems suspect to me, like why would you open up the park again after what happened? Then of course it all kicks off again sooooo...seems like a rehash.

Because dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Nov 26, 2014, 05:50:43 PM
Hubbs you're still gonna watch it and then write up a review for someone to read somewhere, so quit playin' with all of your negative comments. Jurassic World will get your money and time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Nov 26, 2014, 05:53:23 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 26, 2014, 05:42:42 PM
To everyone complaining about the story being predictable, unoriginal, yada yada yada...what were you expecting, exactly? There isn't a whole lot of room for this movie to go.

Exactly, so why the excitement? its possibly gonna be exactly the same as the first movie accept replace a T-Rex with a monster hybrid thing. Just saying, sounds/looks like a rehash.


Quote from: MudButt on Nov 26, 2014, 05:50:43 PM
Hubbs you're still gonna watch it and then write up a review for someone to read somewhere, so quit playin' with all of your negative comments. Jurassic World will get your money and time.

You can't wait for my review can you hehe :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 26, 2014, 05:58:41 PM
Quote from: Hubbs on Nov 26, 2014, 05:53:23 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 26, 2014, 05:42:42 PM
To everyone complaining about the story being predictable, unoriginal, yada yada yada...what were you expecting, exactly? There isn't a whole lot of room for this movie to go.

Exactly, so why the excitement?

Because we haven't had a good dinosaur movie in ages (depending on people's opinions about WWD) and Jurassic Park is a beloved franchise.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Nov 26, 2014, 05:59:38 PM
Quote from: Hubbs on Nov 26, 2014, 05:53:23 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 26, 2014, 05:42:42 PM
To everyone complaining about the story being predictable, unoriginal, yada yada yada...what were you expecting, exactly? There isn't a whole lot of room for this movie to go.

Exactly, so why the excitement? its possibly gonna be exactly the same as the first movie accept replace a T-Rex with a monster hybrid thing. Just saying, sounds/looks like a rehash.


Because dinosaurs.

Spoiler
And the T-Rex is still there so that criticism is a moot point. ;D ;D ;D
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Nov 26, 2014, 06:07:00 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 26, 2014, 05:58:41 PM
Quote from: Hubbs on Nov 26, 2014, 05:53:23 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 26, 2014, 05:42:42 PM
To everyone complaining about the story being predictable, unoriginal, yada yada yada...what were you expecting, exactly? There isn't a whole lot of room for this movie to go.

Exactly, so why the excitement?

Because we haven't had a good dinosaur movie in ages (depending on people's opinions about WWD) and Jurassic Park is a beloved franchise.

Yeah I can see that but wasn't the original movie the only decent one? would you really call it a beloved franchise? Its in the same boat as The Matrix, good first film but then went down hill. Admittedly I don't remember anything about the sequels, gotta rewatch.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 26, 2014, 06:08:36 PM
Lots of people enjoyed The Lost World, and there are those enjoyed JP 3. I don't count myself as one of the latter, but certainly the former.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Nov 26, 2014, 06:14:41 PM
One thing I wish or hope they do is include the intro music from the first film. Jurassic Park felt tense the moment it started.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Nov 26, 2014, 06:16:54 PM
Quote from: Hubbs on Nov 26, 2014, 06:07:00 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 26, 2014, 05:58:41 PM
Quote from: Hubbs on Nov 26, 2014, 05:53:23 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 26, 2014, 05:42:42 PM
To everyone complaining about the story being predictable, unoriginal, yada yada yada...what were you expecting, exactly? There isn't a whole lot of room for this movie to go.

Exactly, so why the excitement?

Because we haven't had a good dinosaur movie in ages (depending on people's opinions about WWD) and Jurassic Park is a beloved franchise.

Yeah I can see that but wasn't the original movie the only decent one? would you really call it a beloved franchise? Its in the same boat as The Matrix, good first film but then went down hill. Admittedly I don't remember anything about the sequels, gotta rewatch.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 26, 2014, 06:08:36 PM
Lots of people enjoyed The Lost World, and there are those enjoyed JP 3. I don't count myself as one of the latter, but certainly the former.

This, The Lost World was a great and interesting sequel (I still prefer JP but I don't see TLW as a "worse" film at all) and JP3 should have had a totally different story, going from TLW there were tons of options to go from there, but then JP3 came as it came...

But i'm psyched about JW, I hope there will be some remarks about JP1, maybe that "restricted area" has some left overs from the first park, like we saw in the teaser poster, that would be cool.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 26, 2014, 06:17:58 PM
I recall that Nedry's jeep had been recovered so hopefully that will be brought up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Nov 26, 2014, 06:18:36 PM
The general audience loves this franchise, critics may have not liked the sequels, but most people did, they were fun action-adventure movies with dinosaurs that looked practically real. And we don't get many dinosaur movies anymore, except if you go on SyFy and find a terrible B-movie. Now, they've moved on with people going back to the island because it would make no sense to have characters return to the island after 3 times of bad shit going down. We now have an open park, something we never saw, we have these dinosaurs in control, something we never saw before, but of course, something has to go wrong. Sure it isn't breaking into new ground but honestly it's 2014, stories aren't original anymore, it's about how it's portrayed on screen whether it be with great characters, good acting, some emotional or tense material, or hell just a good popcorn flick. The point of these movies is people try to think they can control life and they learn they can't, humans never learn, all of these movies have this theme.

so maybe each sequel was a rehash of the original , but they weren't terrible movies for it, and I don't think this one will be either. It has a good director, a good cast, and a good production team. And it has friggin dinosaurs! so I'm in.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Nov 26, 2014, 06:23:34 PM
Even if it was rehash, it can still be good. heck like Jeremy said terminator 2 was rehash.   
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Nov 26, 2014, 06:51:51 PM
Quote from: frenchfries on Nov 26, 2014, 06:23:34 PM
Even if it was rehash, it can still be good. heck like Jeremy said terminator 2 was rehash.
I don't think it was that much of a rehash like Jurassic World, having to bond with the Terminator was something never seen before, rescuing Sarah Connors was an important part of the plot, same for the attack to CyberDyne, not to mention the main character -Sarah- was completely evolved from the last time... It was really much different than the original movie, who played more like a slasher film, .
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Nov 26, 2014, 08:03:42 PM
Quote from: Magegg on Nov 26, 2014, 06:51:51 PM
Quote from: frenchfries on Nov 26, 2014, 06:23:34 PM
Even if it was rehash, it can still be good. heck like Jeremy said terminator 2 was rehash.
I don't think it was that much of a rehash like Jurassic World, having to bond with the Terminator was something never seen before, rescuing Sarah Connors was an important part of the plot, same for the attack to CyberDyne, not to mention the main character -Sarah- was completely evolved from the last time... It was really much different than the original movie, who played more like a slasher film, .

You still had a Terminator trying to kill a Connor. We still have dinosaurs breaking out. Same premise, different details. They are pretty similar in that way. We have never seen trained dinos. We have never seen an open park (this alone is cause for excitement), and we have new dinosaurs. There's enough new material to create a pretty fresh experience even though some of these ideas are a bit risky. I'm sure John Connor bonding with a Terminator sounded weird back in the day :laugh: People probably thought bonding with a machine was "simply" not possible :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 26, 2014, 08:07:08 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Nov 26, 2014, 06:18:36 PM
The general audience loves this franchise, critics may have not liked the sequels, but most people did, they were fun action-adventure movies with dinosaurs that looked practically real. And we don't get many dinosaur movies anymore, except if you go on SyFy and find a terrible B-movie. Now, they've moved on with people going back to the island because it would make no sense to have characters return to the island after 3 times of bad shit going down. We now have an open park, something we never saw, we have these dinosaurs in control, something we never saw before, but of course, something has to go wrong. Sure it isn't breaking into new ground but honestly it's 2014, stories aren't original anymore, it's about how it's portrayed on screen whether it be with great characters, good acting, some emotional or tense material, or hell just a good popcorn flick. The point of these movies is people try to think they can control life and they learn they can't, humans never learn, all of these movies have this theme.

so maybe each sequel was a rehash of the original , but they weren't terrible movies for it, and I don't think this one will be either. It has a good director, a good cast, and a good production team. And it has friggin dinosaurs! so I'm in.

This here...Jeremy Renner knows what's up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BISHOP 93 on Nov 26, 2014, 09:18:44 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 26, 2014, 08:07:08 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Nov 26, 2014, 06:18:36 PM
The general audience loves this franchise, critics may have not liked the sequels, but most people did, they were fun action-adventure movies with dinosaurs that looked practically real. And we don't get many dinosaur movies anymore, except if you go on SyFy and find a terrible B-movie. Now, they've moved on with people going back to the island because it would make no sense to have characters return to the island after 3 times of bad shit going down. We now have an open park, something we never saw, we have these dinosaurs in control



"You never had control thats the illusion! "
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Nov 26, 2014, 09:21:20 PM
Still a park with dinosaurs, even the same location.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 26, 2014, 10:19:55 PM
http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2014/11/26/jurassic-world-looks-neat-now-maybe-its-time-for-a-major-dinosaur-video-game/ (http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2014/11/26/jurassic-world-looks-neat-now-maybe-its-time-for-a-major-dinosaur-video-game/)

I think this author is spot-on.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Nov 26, 2014, 11:19:20 PM
An open world RPG set in prehistoric landscapes would be amazing, with dinosaurs as the AI environment. Far cry with dinosaurs would be amazing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 26, 2014, 11:29:32 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Nov 26, 2014, 11:19:20 PM
An open world RPG set in prehistoric landscapes would be amazing, with dinosaurs as the AI environment. Far cry with dinosaurs would be amazing.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-sPwDVCwGlpc%2FUZD-T7h1VGI%2FAAAAAAAAAxg%2FOMJCIPAuCNQ%2Fs1600%2Ffc3_blooddragon%2B%2810%29.jpg&hash=63ffc507bd28b108b1b46416c77d71983950396d)

They kind of already did that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Nov 27, 2014, 12:03:27 AM
Never heard of it.

which is why they should do it again now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Nov 27, 2014, 12:24:07 AM
Maybe after this movie, there will be more (or less) chances of seeing Savage Land in the X-Men movies D:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Nov 27, 2014, 12:29:04 AM
Quote from: MudButt on Nov 26, 2014, 11:19:20 PM
An open world RPG set in prehistoric landscapes would be amazing, with dinosaurs as the AI environment. Far cry with dinosaurs would be amazing.

I think Saurian is better. Motherf**king dinosaur simulator! Who knows when it will be out though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Nov 27, 2014, 03:17:08 AM
pls take opportunity to make turok good again
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 03:28:41 AM
Folks, we all know which game we really want to see:

Spoiler
Dino Crisis 4
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Nov 27, 2014, 03:49:36 AM
So I'm guessing Dallas is the obligatory cliched naughty scientist behind the hybrid that probably gets eaten by her own creation after defending it all along ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oS9QCzof3wA#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oS9QCzof3wA#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: hfeldhaus on Nov 27, 2014, 04:15:29 AM
im pretty cynical about jurassic world. i just dont think this needs another film. chris pratt makes me need to see it though
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Nov 27, 2014, 04:17:27 AM
I'm still waiting for the sequel where dinosaurs have retaken the Earth ala Planet of the Apes :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Nov 27, 2014, 04:31:53 AM
Quote from: Hubbs on Nov 27, 2014, 04:17:27 AM
I'm still waiting for the sequel where dinosaurs have retaken the Earth ala Planet of the Apes :D
This movie's titled Jurassic World, not Jurassic Earth or Jurassic Planet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Nov 27, 2014, 05:13:08 AM
Quote from: Magegg on Nov 27, 2014, 04:31:53 AM
Quote from: Hubbs on Nov 27, 2014, 04:17:27 AM
I'm still waiting for the sequel where dinosaurs have retaken the Earth ala Planet of the Apes :D
This movie's titled Jurassic World, not Jurassic Earth or Jurassic Planet.

Yeah but that's what I'm expecting for future sequels :) there is no where else to go with the franchise.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Keg on Nov 27, 2014, 06:53:18 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 03:28:41 AM
Folks, we all know which game we really want to see:

Spoiler
Dino Crisis 4
[close]

There was a Dino Crisis 3?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Nov 27, 2014, 07:06:42 AM
Quote from: Hubbs on Nov 27, 2014, 05:13:08 AM
Quote from: Magegg on Nov 27, 2014, 04:31:53 AM
Quote from: Hubbs on Nov 27, 2014, 04:17:27 AM
I'm still waiting for the sequel where dinosaurs have retaken the Earth ala Planet of the Apes :D
This movie's titled Jurassic World, not Jurassic Earth or Jurassic Planet.

Yeah but that's what I'm expecting for future sequels :) there is no where else to go with the franchise.
I know, I was just f**king around, peace, dude XD
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 27, 2014, 07:20:36 AM
Quote from: Hubbs on Nov 27, 2014, 05:13:08 AM
there is no where else to go with the franchise.

So untrue.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on Nov 27, 2014, 08:35:37 AM
Quote from: hfeldhaus on Nov 27, 2014, 04:15:29 AM
im pretty cynical about jurassic world. i just dont think this needs another film. chris pratt makes me need to see it though

I think even the most die-hard fan should agree to this. There is no need for another movie. The only reason why people want another JP-Movie is, because we want to see well-done Dinosaurs on the big screen again... but let's be honest... who doesn't?! No matter how little I care for the actual movie, I'm finally gonna get a Mosasaur on screen, that's enough to at least get me excited a little bit.

Still not too fond of Pratt, he seems super-awkward in that role (maybe it's just the lines in the trailer, but that doesn't help), but who knows he might pull it off well...

Couldn't give a shit about th Hybrid though...

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Nov 27, 2014, 08:54:49 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 27, 2014, 07:20:36 AM
Quote from: Hubbs on Nov 27, 2014, 05:13:08 AM
there is no where else to go with the franchise.

So untrue.

Well what else can you do other than Dinos running amok somewhere and eatin' folks.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bender1988 on Nov 27, 2014, 09:07:04 AM
Quote from: Hubbs on Nov 27, 2014, 08:54:49 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 27, 2014, 07:20:36 AM
Quote from: Hubbs on Nov 27, 2014, 05:13:08 AM
there is no where else to go with the franchise.

So untrue.

Well what else can you do other than Dinos running amok somewhere and eatin' folks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqgJ6wzSW8k (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqgJ6wzSW8k)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 27, 2014, 10:06:48 AM
I had a little pop at editing the trailer myself.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EBDFXpsHd8E#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EBDFXpsHd8E#ws)

Quote from: Hubbs on Nov 27, 2014, 08:54:49 AM
Well what else can you do other than Dinos running amok somewhere and eatin' folks.

Jurassic Park has only got 4 movies in the franchise, there's plenty of room for expansion and other stories. And that does include Dinos running amok and eaten' folk with each movie. That's the action side of it and a large part of why people go to see a JP film.

James Bond has 22 movies and only beats bad guys with his plethora of gadgets and ploughs woman, and Godzilla, well...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: reecebomb on Nov 27, 2014, 10:07:03 AM
Im sorry but this trailer makes the film seem like a syfy movie compared to the original. Environments and dinosaurs look so unconvincing, this is a movie not a videogame. Sadly, not looking forward to Jurassic World anymore, i will be very very surprised if the movie turns out to be good. 

Btw have any of you seen this film written and directed by Colin Trevorrow?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PS5CJOwyh9s# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PS5CJOwyh9s#)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 27, 2014, 10:12:12 AM
Quote from: reecebomb on Nov 27, 2014, 10:07:03 AM
Sadly, not looking forward to Jurassic World anymore,

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F3vKJqc7.gif&hash=85d49961eeb687367b30e9100740be600fddb8c0)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Nov 27, 2014, 10:30:00 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 27, 2014, 10:12:12 AM
Quote from: reecebomb on Nov 27, 2014, 10:07:03 AM
Sadly, not looking forward to Jurassic World anymore,

http://i.imgur.com/3vKJqc7.gif
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Frs1137.pbsrc.com%2Falbums%2Fn513%2Fworkel3915%2FConan%2520gifs%2Fkneeslapbellylaugh.gif%7Ec200&hash=3d0e0c5f6142aada948f8f2f9faad2adc1632066)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: reecebomb on Nov 27, 2014, 10:57:09 AM
Yet another soulless rehash and with much worse cgi after two decades. I don't understand why you are all so pumped for this after seeing this tralier. I was pumped too, but the trailer gives almost no hope. I will of course still give it a chance since i love dinosaurs, maybe this will end up just fine. Not likely though. Jurassic Park franchise deserves much better, there are plenty of ways to explore it's world.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 27, 2014, 11:05:03 AM
CGI is unfinished.

This is not a rehash, its going over new ground. ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Wrecktangle on Nov 27, 2014, 11:25:46 AM
For me as a child, the magic of Jurassic Park was seeing Dinosaurss resurrected.

I'm unsure of the mutant engineered dino route.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Nov 27, 2014, 11:39:27 AM
To be fair, genetic crossover has been involved in JP since the beginning. I'm cautiously optimistic. JP was the first film I ever saw at the cinema so it holds a special place in my heart. I'm curious to see where they go with it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: reecebomb on Nov 27, 2014, 11:44:38 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 27, 2014, 11:05:03 AM
CGI is unfinished.

This is not a rehash, its going over new ground. ::)

Yes, not a complete rehash, well see how goes once it's out. Cgi is obviously unfinished, but not crossing my fingers for a meaningful cgi update. It's not only the cgi that bothers me, the characters seem a bit uninspired, the whole world seems very cosmetical. Chris Pratt was ok in Guardians of the Galaxy, not sure how he will handle this role. Id love to see this type of film go down with a more subtle route, not a overkill hundred obviously computerized dinosaurs on screen at once. King Kong had amazing T-Rex fights (best dinosaur vfx so far), contradictorily the dinosaur stampede looked ridiculous. I hope that Jurassic World learned something from that scene. Godzilla wasn't a much of a film overall, but liked how the cgi was done very tastefully.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 27, 2014, 11:51:04 AM
There's going to be a ton of CGI and it'll all look spectacular.

JP brought the world CGI is all it's glory. JW will show us how far we've advanced.

How can you get that the characters are uninspired from barely any footage showcasing their personalities?

Half the characters aren't shown.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: reecebomb on Nov 27, 2014, 12:05:59 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 27, 2014, 11:51:04 AM
There's going to be a ton of CGI and it'll all look spectacular.

JP brought the world CGI is all it's glory. JW will show us how far we've advanced.

How can you get that the characters are uninspired from barely any footage showcasing their personalities?

Half the characters aren't shown.

Hobbit 3 trailer makes one really think that the cgi is actually regressing not advancing. Recent trend is quantity vs quality. I can't really say that the characters are uninspired just from the trailer, just a gut feeling. I'd love to see the final film prove me wrong. Just that when i get a bad feeling from a trailer the final film also ends up not being very good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 12:27:16 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 27, 2014, 11:51:04 AM
There's going to be a ton of CGI and it'll all look spectacular.

JP brought the world CGI is all it's glory. JW will show us how far we've advanced.

How can you get that the characters are uninspired from barely any footage showcasing their personalities?

Half the characters aren't shown.

I think the trailer's CG was unfinished, but to suggest that the end result will have the same impact as the original is overestimating things a bit. CG in Jurassic Park blew people away mostly because it hadn't been used in a movie before. People nowadays aren't so easily wowed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: AvatarIII on Nov 27, 2014, 01:07:08 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 27, 2014, 11:05:03 AM
This is not a rehash, its going over new ground. ::)

even if it is a rehash, who cares? some "rehashes" are great movies!!

Evil Dead 2 was a rehash of The Evil Dead
Terminator 2 was a rehash of The Terminator

The idea of a sequel that is a bigger, better, dare I say flashier "rehash" of the original is not a new idea, and historically it has worked well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 27, 2014, 01:25:40 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on Nov 27, 2014, 01:07:08 PM
even if it is a rehash, who cares? some "rehashes" are great movies!!

I agree.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 12:27:16 PM
to suggest that the end result will have the same impact as the original is overestimating things a bit. CG in Jurassic Park blew people away mostly because it hadn't been used in a movie before. People nowadays aren't so easily wowed.

Never said it would have the same impact, just said the CG will be the result of everything that came before it.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 01:58:24 PM
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/11/141126-jurassic-park-trailer-experts-science/ (http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/11/141126-jurassic-park-trailer-experts-science/)

QuoteWho doesn't love a dinosaur flick? Well, paleontologists have a few fossil bones to pick with Jurassic World, the latest in a line of dinosaur movies that once bragged about its scientific credibility.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-ufmGXTLfujE%2FU9AWMUAl8fI%2FAAAAAAAAUXY%2FBqXTuzIjaGM%2Fs1600%2Fhe%26%23039%3Bs%2Bright%2Byou%2Bknow.jpg&hash=0398f6f27b73a021616a6acb5a1a3f5108c3e6de)

Also,

http://log.johnconway.co/post/103650800597/why-dinosaur-nerds-are-mad-at-jurassic-world (http://log.johnconway.co/post/103650800597/why-dinosaur-nerds-are-mad-at-jurassic-world)

And before someone says, "Bah, it's just a movie, genetic engineering, yada yada yada", Thomas Holtz once again has some wisdom for y'all.

http://twitter.com/TomHoltzPaleo/status/537688147568914433 (http://twitter.com/TomHoltzPaleo/status/537688147568914433)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Nov 27, 2014, 02:05:24 PM
Speaking of the CGI gate shot:

Colin Trevorrow @colintrevorrow
@TheHoyt08 The gate is practical, the environment isn't. That shot was made specifically for the trailer. The film will be different.

Colin Trevorrow @colintrevorrow
@alexfieldsman the gate will be practical. Real wood, concrete and steel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Nov 27, 2014, 03:33:49 PM
Empire magazine has a mini-interview with Colin Trevorrow, breaking down the JW trailer. Well worth the read.

http://www.empireonline.com/features/jurassic-world-teaser-trailer-tour (http://www.empireonline.com/features/jurassic-world-teaser-trailer-tour)

(And thanks for the links Doom, glad to know I'm not on my own with that opinion.)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 04:28:26 PM
You were never alone, my friend.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2FAaV0TRmmedEzK%2Fgiphy.gif&hash=1a12e1107386462d3f79304fd5eea5b7bc0f6f80)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 27, 2014, 04:30:57 PM
 :-* :-* :-* :-*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 04:42:59 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 27, 2014, 04:30:57 PM
:-* :-* :-* :-*

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reactiongifs.us%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F08%2Fshaking_head_breaking_bad.gif&hash=12292eaa5c6e94c150c553d0df64c439262bd0ae)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Nov 27, 2014, 04:43:45 PM
Liked your trailer Alien3. Just wished you'd used the intro music from Jurassic Park and edited out the Raptor/bike thing.

I'm still not sure on that concept. The Raptors I know and love from the previous films would have shredded Pratt to bits before he could say "Clever girl".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Nov 27, 2014, 04:45:13 PM
Quote from: Hubbs on Nov 27, 2014, 05:13:08 AM
there is no where else to go with the franchise.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi59.tinypic.com%2Fdqlzf4.jpg&hash=47e70436254eb4cda55bbe3acce40e4a8a6da40c)

http://www.dorkly.com/post/70871/reminder-jurassic-world-was-almost-about-human-raptor-hybrid-soldiers (http://www.dorkly.com/post/70871/reminder-jurassic-world-was-almost-about-human-raptor-hybrid-soldiers)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 04:49:57 PM
Quote from: Magegg on Nov 27, 2014, 04:45:13 PM
Quote from: Hubbs on Nov 27, 2014, 05:13:08 AM
there is no where else to go with the franchise.
http://i59.tinypic.com/dqlzf4.jpg

http://www.dorkly.com/post/70871/reminder-jurassic-world-was-almost-about-human-raptor-hybrid-soldiers (http://www.dorkly.com/post/70871/reminder-jurassic-world-was-almost-about-human-raptor-hybrid-soldiers)

"Starring Nicholas Cage as every character."

:D :D :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 27, 2014, 05:02:27 PM
Quote from: Taxemic on Nov 27, 2014, 04:43:45 PM
The Raptors I know and love from the previous films would have shredded Pratt to bits before he could say "Clever girl".

Yet Muldoon said "clever girl" before he got shredded, Kelly beat a raptor with nothing but gymnastics, and Grant managed to play a flute. :-*

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fyeartwo.cinema52.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F08%2FRaptorNoseFlute.png&hash=763ec3616ac6af13f65bda0484e1a03fcf82631b)

Quote from: Taxemic on Nov 27, 2014, 04:43:45 PM
Liked your trailer Alien3.

Cheers ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Nov 27, 2014, 05:05:31 PM
That's such a nostalgia ridden thing to say :laugh:
I dunno, I'm getting to the point where I'm just accepting new things purely for enjoyment when it comes to movies and television.
Semi trained Raptors and Mutant dinos are daft ideas, but if they get pulled off well I dont care about how they started.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Nov 27, 2014, 05:05:59 PM
Muldoon was a pro, Kelly was angry cuz she got cut from the team and Grant, well...he just wanted to blow Billy's pipe.

However they all had to do something to avoid being eaten.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Nov 27, 2014, 05:19:57 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 01:58:24 PM
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/11/141126-jurassic-park-trailer-experts-science/ (http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/11/141126-jurassic-park-trailer-experts-science/)

QuoteWho doesn't love a dinosaur flick? Well, paleontologists have a few fossil bones to pick with Jurassic World, the latest in a line of dinosaur movies that once bragged about its scientific credibility.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-ufmGXTLfujE%2FU9AWMUAl8fI%2FAAAAAAAAUXY%2FBqXTuzIjaGM%2Fs1600%2Fhe%26%23039%3Bs%2Bright%2Byou%2Bknow.jpg&hash=0398f6f27b73a021616a6acb5a1a3f5108c3e6de)

Also,

http://log.johnconway.co/post/103650800597/why-dinosaur-nerds-are-mad-at-jurassic-world (http://log.johnconway.co/post/103650800597/why-dinosaur-nerds-are-mad-at-jurassic-world)

And before someone says, "Bah, it's just a movie, genetic engineering, yada yada yada", Thomas Holtz once again has some wisdom for y'all.

http://twitter.com/TomHoltzPaleo/status/537688147568914433 (http://twitter.com/TomHoltzPaleo/status/537688147568914433)

Im glad someone else pointed out the fact that they're feeding it a f**king White Shark, lol. The f**k kinda biological preserve feeds endangered species to their dinosaurs.


But the script actually addresses their concerns about stupid dinosaurs, I guess it isn't enough to justify it to some people.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 05:21:20 PM
Does it?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Nov 27, 2014, 05:25:24 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 05:21:20 PM
Does it?
The scientists tried to dumb the dinosaurs down to appeal to visitors, isn't that something in the script?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 05:28:57 PM
In which case, I'm going to defer to the Twitter quote I posted in my earlier comment. If that's truly the case, about making the dinosaurs dumb, then there's no reason why they couldn't be turned into lumbering beasts.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 27, 2014, 05:37:05 PM
I think what Gate is talking about is this chapter from the JP novel. (Not the script)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GBB62IgLoI#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GBB62IgLoI#ws)

Quote from: Gate on Nov 27, 2014, 05:19:57 PM
Im glad someone else pointed out the fact that they're feeding it a f**king White Shark, lol. The f**k kinda biological preserve feeds endangered species to their dinosaurs.

The sharks are cloned addressed by the director in the latest Empire article about the trailer.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Nov 27, 2014, 05:46:28 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 27, 2014, 05:37:05 PM
I think what Gate is talking about is this chapter from the JP novel. (Not the script)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GBB62IgLoI#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GBB62IgLoI#ws)

Quote from: Gate on Nov 27, 2014, 05:19:57 PM
Im glad someone else pointed out the fact that they're feeding it a f**king White Shark, lol. The f**k kinda biological preserve feeds endangered species to their dinosaurs.

The sharks are cloned addressed by the director in the latest Empire article about the trailer.
Oh my god. Somebody call PETA.  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Nov 27, 2014, 06:01:54 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 27, 2014, 11:05:03 AM
CGI is unfinished.

This is not a rehash, its going over new ground. ::)

Isn't that...going over old ground? ;)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 27, 2014, 06:46:29 PM
Hubbs come on, you know you want Dinosaurs. More Dinosaurs. More and more Dinosaurs. Search your feelings, you know it to be true.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Nov 27, 2014, 06:50:56 PM
what hubbs wants is more KAIJU


Spoiler
kaiju kaiju kaiju
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 27, 2014, 06:52:53 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmeninblack.tribute.ca%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F04%2FEdgar.jpg&hash=7b46c35d42e893c58589f6df2eeec7c76023af22)

Don't do that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 27, 2014, 06:54:27 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fkmpunksays.files.wordpress.com%2F2012%2F12%2Fvqbch.gif%23mib%2520skin%2520suit%2520gif%2520400x200&hash=854e4cbdbf5d037bb0e88f728b972913c1907c4d)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 27, 2014, 06:58:08 PM
 :laugh:


Anyway, I'm pretty glad they found the time to give the Mosasaurus a proper pharyngeal jaw, despite the obvious size inaccuracy. It's a pretty neat detail.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Nov 27, 2014, 07:04:16 PM
(https://scontent-a-mia.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xap1/v/t1.0-9/10676180_618218161617026_5768374584357903011_n.png?oh=b24e4c3c41cf1cc362fa1f221ca3c3d8&oe=54DA46FE)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Nov 27, 2014, 07:06:00 PM
f**k the haters

hubbs
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 27, 2014, 07:07:29 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Nov 27, 2014, 07:06:00 PM
f**k the haters

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FnzkEx.gif%3F2&hash=8e16448c46af1653a511fb238b8aae265e8568a4)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 07:10:13 PM
I'm really curious to know. Why do you folks become so uppity when folks like Vertigo and I maintain that the dinosaurs in a movie should be scientifically accurate?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 27, 2014, 07:14:38 PM
Because they're not real dinosaurs. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 07:16:08 PM
They're dinosaurs, real or otherwise. There's no actual reason why they can't look like what science tells us. And if that's your reasoning, then I guess you really wouldn't mind if they were all tail-draggers, right?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 27, 2014, 07:16:40 PM
...or is there?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Nov 27, 2014, 07:17:30 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 07:16:08 PM
They're dinosaurs, real or otherwise. There's no actual reason why they can't look like what science tells us. And if that's your reasoning, then I guess you really wouldn't mind if they were all tail-draggers, right?
Feathers look dumb

Slow sucks
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 07:18:11 PM
There isn't, and don't say it's because of "broken DNA". That's moot. If genetic engineering is what it's all about, they can be engineered to look the part, which they aren't.

Quote from: BANE on Nov 27, 2014, 07:17:30 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 07:16:08 PM
They're dinosaurs, real or otherwise. There's no actual reason why they can't look like what science tells us. And if that's your reasoning, then I guess you really wouldn't mind if they were all tail-draggers, right?
Feathers look dumb

No feathers looks dumb.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 27, 2014, 07:20:56 PM
I've not seen anyone go really uppity about it, just stating their opinion.

The basic point is that the original film balanced accuracy with 'cool'. So did film two. So did film three. So does this. The Mosasaurus as far as I can see is anatomically accurate -- but is oversized. The original T.Rex had small anatomical inaccuracies regardless of the feathers/non-feathers thing. So on and so forth.

'Tail draggers' wouldn't be minded, no, but audience today likes the new fast Dinosaurs. It's what CGI brought in. Fast lethal things. Tail draggers are associated with old Dinosaur movies only Harryhausen fans such as me remember fondly.

You also have to take into account that the JP Dinosaurs have become imprinted in the public imagination much like the Terminator, or Alien, or Robocop have. They're icons.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Nov 27, 2014, 07:21:43 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 07:16:08 PM
They're dinosaurs, real or otherwise. There's no actual reason why they can't look like what science tells us. And if that's your reasoning, then I guess you really wouldn't mind if they were all tail-draggers, right?

not at all tbh
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BANE on Nov 27, 2014, 07:22:30 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 07:18:11 PM
Quote from: BANE on Nov 27, 2014, 07:17:30 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 07:16:08 PM
They're dinosaurs, real or otherwise. There's no actual reason why they can't look like what science tells us. And if that's your reasoning, then I guess you really wouldn't mind if they were all tail-draggers, right?
Feathers look dumb

No feathers looks dumb.
You know you don't actually believe that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 27, 2014, 07:22:48 PM
I'm not averse to seeing feathered dinosaurs in a movie, but to just crowbar it into this franchise four movies in would be jarring.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 07:25:30 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Nov 27, 2014, 07:20:56 PM
I've not seen anyone go really uppity about it, just stating their opinion.

The basic point is that the original film balanced accuracy with 'cool'. So did film two. So did film three. So does this. The Mosasaurus as far as I can see is anatomically accurate -- but is oversized. The original T.Rex had small anatomical inaccuracies regardless of the feathers/non-feathers thing. So on and so forth.

Yes, and they could easily have been corrected. Why does a dinosaur need to be inaccurate in order to be "cool"? Dinosaurs are cool just the way they are.

Quote from: Omegazilla on Nov 27, 2014, 07:20:56 PM
'Tail draggers' wouldn't be minded, no, but audience today likes the new fast Dinosaurs. It's what CGI brought in. Fast lethal things. Tail draggers are associated with old Dinosaur movies only Harryhausen fans such as me remember fondly.

I wouldn't be surprised if people were complaining about the elimination of the classic tail-dragging posture, but grew to love the correct posture because it made sense. There's no reason why feathered dinosaurs couldn't or wouldn't have the same effect.

Quote from: Omegazilla on Nov 27, 2014, 07:20:56 PM
You also have to take into account that the JP Dinosaurs have become imprinted in the public imagination much like the Terminator, or Alien, or Robocop have. They're icons.

Except that all of those creatures are wholly fictitious, created in someone's mind. Dinosaurs aren't. Dinosaur design can evolve, just like the science has because dinosaurs were real creatures.

Also, like you said, they've become imprinted in the public imagination, ergo, they have shaped how the general public sees dinosaurs. No reason why that can't change.

Quote from: BANE on Nov 27, 2014, 07:22:30 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 07:18:11 PM
Quote from: BANE on Nov 27, 2014, 07:17:30 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 07:16:08 PM
They're dinosaurs, real or otherwise. There's no actual reason why they can't look like what science tells us. And if that's your reasoning, then I guess you really wouldn't mind if they were all tail-draggers, right?
Feathers look dumb

No feathers looks dumb.
You know you don't actually believe that.

I kinda do. I enjoy seeing how different artists present dinosaurs with plumage. Every illustration is different.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 27, 2014, 07:26:07 PM
I'll post this I guess...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPqpwfXdYQU (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPqpwfXdYQU)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Nov 27, 2014, 07:26:17 PM
yoshi for 5th movie pls
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 27, 2014, 07:27:08 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Nov 27, 2014, 07:26:17 PM
yoshi for 5th movie pls

And Bowser for 6th movie
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 27, 2014, 08:51:11 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 07:25:30 PM
Yes, and they could easily have been corrected. Why does a dinosaur need to be inaccurate in order to be "cool"? Dinosaurs are cool just the way they are.
It doesn't, but most of the times accuracy tampers with creative liberty. But that's besides the point; if the original Jurassic Park started out with this filmmaking philosophy, why should the new film be blamed for continuing tradition?

Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 07:25:30 PM
I wouldn't be surprised if people were complaining about the elimination of the classic tail-dragging posture, but grew to love the correct posture because it made sense. There's no reason why feathered dinosaurs couldn't or wouldn't have the same effect.
In reality a lot of old people miss the tail draggers. If you listen to a few interviews to Harryhausen & associates, they miss the tail draggers.

Regardless, the Jurassic Park Dinosaurs work visually for a lot of people, whereas Dinosaurs with feathers are inevitably associated with everyday things such as parrots or pigeons or what have you. It's the same reason most Movie Monsters are skinny and emaciated -- making them with a six pack doesn't make them threatening.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 07:25:30 PM
Except that all of those creatures are wholly fictitious, created in someone's mind. Dinosaurs aren't. Dinosaur design can evolve, just like the science has because dinosaurs were real creatures.
Irrelevant.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 07:25:30 PM
Also, like you said, they've become imprinted in the public imagination, ergo, they have shaped how the general public sees dinosaurs. No reason why that can't change.
They won't take the risk, and that's kind of understandable.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Nov 27, 2014, 08:51:54 PM
Feathers don't have to look dumb.  No one looks at an eagle and thinks thinks the plumage makes them look any less fearsome of a predator. 

I'm perfectly happy that the Jurassic World dinosaurs look the same as they do in the other movies - like Omegazilla said, they are iconic movie characters.  Less excited about public perception of dinosaurs remaining unchanged.  I go to a fairly "prestigious" math and science high school in my city and I had the utmost difficulty convincing a friend that dinosaurs evolved into birds, of that a whole bunch of them had feathers. 

He also could not wrap his head around the idea that any of the plesiosaurs or pterosaurs weren't dinosaurs, though I am expecting a scene in Jurassic World where someone calls the mosasaur a marine dinosaur, and a scientist character corrects them.  That would at least be one prehistoric animal misconception averted.

In a world where Gravity or Interstellar get analyzed so much for the quality of its science (hi Neil), I do feel dread for what Jurassic World is going to face.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Nov 27, 2014, 09:04:08 PM
There's definitely a part of me that wished they had the balls to just go, "Screw it, they have feathers now." But at the same time I don't mind seeing familiar JP dino designs in a JP movie. It's just when every other f**king movie and TV show uses JP inspired designs rather than looking at what we've learned about these animals since the early 90s. There totally needs to be that next big dinosaur movie that pushes the way the public sees them into the 21st century.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Nov 27, 2014, 09:06:14 PM
Feathers are awesome :D

I want some f**king Owlbear  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 09:51:58 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Nov 27, 2014, 08:51:11 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 07:25:30 PM
Yes, and they could easily have been corrected. Why does a dinosaur need to be inaccurate in order to be "cool"? Dinosaurs are cool just the way they are.
It doesn't, but most of the times accuracy tampers with creative liberty. But that's besides the point; if the original Jurassic Park started out with this filmmaking philosophy, why should the new film be blamed for continuing tradition?

Tradition is a pathetic excuse. If everything was done according to "tradition", we would never evolve as a species or as a society. And to directly answer your question, it's because we didn't know then what we know now.

Quote from: Omegazilla on Nov 27, 2014, 08:51:11 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 07:25:30 PM
I wouldn't be surprised if people were complaining about the elimination of the classic tail-dragging posture, but grew to love the correct posture because it made sense. There's no reason why feathered dinosaurs couldn't or wouldn't have the same effect.
In reality a lot of old people miss the tail draggers. If you listen to a few interviews to Harryhausen & associates, they miss the tail draggers.

Well there you go, like I said.

Quote from: Omegazilla on Nov 27, 2014, 08:51:11 PM
Regardless, the Jurassic Park Dinosaurs work visually for a lot of people, whereas Dinosaurs with feathers are inevitably associated with everyday things such as parrots or pigeons or what have you. It's the same reason most Movie Monsters are skinny and emaciated -- making them with a six pack doesn't make them threatening.

Trust me when I say people will be able to tell the difference between a Velociraptor covered in feathers versus a turkey.

Quote from: Omegazilla on Nov 27, 2014, 08:51:11 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 07:25:30 PM
Except that all of those creatures are wholly fictitious, created in someone's mind. Dinosaurs aren't. Dinosaur design can evolve, just like the science has because dinosaurs were real creatures.
Irrelevant.

No, it isn't. Dinosaurs were subject to the laws of nature like any other animal and so they should be treated with the respect they deserve.

Quote from: Omegazilla on Nov 27, 2014, 08:51:11 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 07:25:30 PM
Also, like you said, they've become imprinted in the public imagination, ergo, they have shaped how the general public sees dinosaurs. No reason why that can't change.
They won't take the risk, and that's kind of understandable.

What risk? There isn't any. If anything, younger kids would enjoy seeing it because new dinosaur kids books are starting to reflect the latest in discoveries.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Nov 27, 2014, 10:01:59 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 09:51:58 PM
Trust me when I say people will be able to tell the difference between a Velociraptor covered in feathers versus a turkey.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fearnthis.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F09%2Ftumblr_m5nheuJewY1qdapmmo1_500.png&hash=638029a9ce744d90ec01857dc52e3be05d860d52)

you tell that little shit grant

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 27, 2014, 10:05:26 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 09:51:58 PM
Tradition is a pathetic excuse. If everything was done according to "tradition", we would never evolve as a species or as a society. And to directly answer your question, it's because we didn't know then what we know now.
What does that have to do with this? The film is going on safe ground because that's what most sequels do. You go ballsy, you go risky.

Knowing many things did not stop the JP Dinosaurs from being partially inaccurate to their real life counterparts even with the information available at the time. The T.Rex's teeth are sharper than what they would have been, and the arms are slightly longer than they should be. And so on and so forth.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 09:51:58 PM
Trust me when I say people will be able to tell the difference between a Velociraptor covered in feathers versus a turkey.
I can tell the difference between a pug and a pug-headed werewolf. Doesn't make the pug-headed werewolf any more threatening -- or cool looking. That's what the audience cares for.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 09:51:58 PM
No, it isn't. Dinosaurs were subject to the laws of nature like any other animal and so they should be treated with the respect they deserve.
...Countless films take liberties with what animals can and cannot do or what they look like. Real sharks would do about 20% of what you see in Jaws.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 09:51:58 PM
What risk? There isn't any. If anything, younger kids would enjoy seeing it because new dinosaur kids books are starting to reflect the latest in discoveries.
God yes there is. When people see Jurassic Park sequels, they expect Jurassic Park Dinosaurs. The filmmakers don't want to risk to disappoint audiences. They're going safe.


I am wholly indifferent to this whole ordeal. The point is, does this film have the rights to do what it is doing? Yes it does.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 10:18:23 PM
Yet you're forgetting the real problem that all these "liberties" contribute to, and that is perpetual ignorance about dinosaurs. People to this day still go to museums and are shocked that Velociraptor wasn't much bigger than a small dog or that Dilophosaurus doesn't have a frill. For crying out loud, the mosasaur from the trailer is bring called a dinosaur, and the film isn't even out yet!

Please tell me how many people were inspired to become palaeontologists after the sequels were released. As for JP inspiring people, yes that's true when people bring it up, but it's those same people who grow aggravated when dinosaurs are portrayed inaccurately on screen.

It's not as if people are going to storm out of the theatre if a dinosaur has some plumage on it. I really don't think you're giving audiences any credit at all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Nov 27, 2014, 10:18:51 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Nov 27, 2014, 07:20:56 PM
The basic point is that the original film balanced accuracy with 'cool'. So did film two. So did film three. So does this. The Mosasaurus as far as I can see is anatomically accurate -- but is oversized. The original T.Rex had small anatomical inaccuracies regardless of the feathers/non-feathers thing. So on and so forth.

The first film was pretty damn accurate based on the science of the late '80s/early '90s.

Flourishes like Dilophosaurus' frill/venom and Tyrannosaurus' knobbly face adornment were fanciful but not scientifically implausible - the most popular dinosaur book of the last few years is based on the same principle.
Scientists had even discussed the possibility of Dilophosaurus having an unusual killing method, because its jaw was thought to be so weak that it couldn't have been used to wound large prey.

As for what now looks wrong...
Accuracy specifics. Warning, it's a long one

-Crichton's "raptors" were actually supposed to be the giant Asian dromaeosaurid that would eventually be named Achillobator, which was mentioned in Predatory Dinosaurs Of The World, the book that inspired JP's dinosaur descriptions. The remains weren't officially described until 1999, but Gregory Paul apparently had some conception of the size 11 years beforehand.
The film used Deinonychus as the visual basis, as it was the largest well-known dromaeosaur at the time, then extrapolated a more heavyset creature from that.
As for the name, Crichton subscribed to a theory in the '80s that all dromaeosaurids were so closely related that they should be united under one genus - Velociraptor, being the oldest name.


-JP's rex is slightly bigger than the largest known Tyrannosaurus, Sue, but it's within theoretical bounds for size variance within a species. Given that it's only known from 50 individuals, it's a pretty safe bet that there were adults far smaller and larger than the ones we've found.

As for the 'visual accuity based on movement' - believe it or not, that's based in science too. Crichton liked to showcase cutting edge research, and an emerging field during the '80s was the analysis of fossilised braincases to draw parallels to living animals. Early research suggested Tyrannosaurus' sensory centre was similar to that of an amphibian, and Crichton extrapolated from that.
Of course, we now know that the exact opposite was true, and Tyrannosaurus actually had exceptional eyesight, but the science has come a lot further since then.


-Dilophosaurus is of course a big bundle of wrong, in the film at least. As mentioned before, the venom and frill were speculative. As for the size and head shape, this was an honest mistake, based on the designer using the original holotype for reference -
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fqilong.files.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F08%2Fdilophosaurus-as-megalosaurus-wetherilli.jpg%3Fw%3D1102%26amp%3Bh%3D690&hash=c8d8d2c2be74704c45c5846e6d6678280a7e9a0c)
(For anyone who doesn't know, Dilophosaurus was originally thought to be a new species of Megalosaurus.)

This was actually a very common mistake, and my pre-JP dinosaur books also showed Dilophosaurus with a generic carnosaur skull, rather than the pointy, long-toothed coelophysoid skull it actually had.


-All the theropods have pronating 'bunny hands'. We now know that prosauropods and theropods had very inflexible wrists and forearms, particularly with regard to the position of the hands - in other words, holding a basketball, not dribbling it. The dinosaurs right at the avian root (such as Velociraptor) had additional bones which allowed them to bend the hand sideways towards the wrist, but even they couldn't make their palms face the floor without splaying their arms close to 90 degrees.
However, this is based on studies that were published between 2002 and 2008, so even Jurassic Park 3 wasn't inaccurate for its time, in this regard.


-Feathers. We now know that all coelurosaurs - the group that includes Compsognathus, Gallimimus, Tyrannosaurus and Velociraptor - had proto-feathers as the primary integument. It's important to note that 'proto-feather' is a broad-ranging term - compsognathid feathers were very similar to mammalian hair, ornithomimosaurs had fluffy down like a bird chick, dromaeosaurids had proper wing feathers.
Tyrannosaurus itself is probably safe though - multi-ton animals from warm/temperate climates don't need insulation, so if it had any kind of feather, it would have been for display. My guess is that it was scaly all over, and we have found samples of scaly skin in its closest relatives. That said, rex junior would probably have been massively fluffy and cute as a button.

Anyway. The evidence for feathers in dinosaurs didn't really reach a tipping point until Microraptor was described in 2002, after even Jurassic Park 3.


-Finally, cloning dinosaurs from mosquitos trapped in amber. When Crichton wrote Jurassic Park, it was genuinely believed in the scientific community that this was possible. Partial strands of DNA had recently been found in Cretaceous amber, and it was thought it was just a case of finding the right amber, and achieving the understanding of genetics to be able to 'patch' missing base pairs (the vast majority of any genome consists of 'junk' pairs anyway).
Crichton addresses the various other difficulties of cloning a dinosaur in the book.

Anyway, it later turned out that at least some of that Cretaceous DNA was actually a more recent contaminant (there's still a piece of plant matter that my cursory search didn't find any evidence disproving). We've only ever found a couple of mosquitos preserved in Mesozoic amber, and even if we could find one that had recently drunk dinosaur blood, it seems there would almost inevitably be contaminants from the bug itself, even if any of the DNA was preserved, and even if we could figure out how to patch the genome.
Still. This has largely been figured out due to the scrutiny that was placed on the subject after Crichton's writing.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 10:20:21 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Nov 27, 2014, 10:18:51 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Nov 27, 2014, 07:20:56 PM
The basic point is that the original film balanced accuracy with 'cool'. So did film two. So did film three. So does this. The Mosasaurus as far as I can see is anatomically accurate -- but is oversized. The original T.Rex had small anatomical inaccuracies regardless of the feathers/non-feathers thing. So on and so forth.

The first film was pretty damn accurate based on the science of the late '80s/early '90s.

Flourishes like Dilophosaurus' frill/venom and Tyrannosaurus' knobbly face adornment were fanciful but not scientifically implausible - the most popular dinosaur book of the last few years is based on the same principle.
Scientists had even discussed the possibility of Dilophosaurus having an unusual killing method, because its jaw was thought to be so weak that it couldn't have been used to wound large prey.

As for what now looks wrong...
Accuracy specifics. Warning, it's a long one

-Crichton's "raptors" were actually supposed to be the giant Asian dromaeosaurid that would eventually be named Achillobator, which was mentioned in Predatory Dinosaurs Of The World, the book that inspired JP's dinosaur descriptions. The remains weren't officially described until 1999, but Gregory Paul apparently had some conception of the size 11 years beforehand.
The film used Deinonychus as the visual basis, as it was the largest well-known dromaeosaur at the time, then extrapolated a more heavyset creature from that.
As for the name, Crichton subscribed to a theory in the '80s that all dromaeosaurids were so closely related that they should be united under one genus - Velociraptor, being the oldest name.


-JP's rex is slightly bigger than the largest known Tyrannosaurus, Sue, but it's within theoretical bounds for size variance within a species. Given that it's only known from 50 individuals, it's a pretty safe bet that there were adults far smaller and larger than the ones we've found.

As for the 'visual accuity based on movement' - believe it or not, that's based in science too. Crichton liked to showcase cutting edge research, and an emerging field during the '80s was the analysis of fossilised braincases to draw parallels to living animals. Early research suggested Tyrannosaurus' sensory centre was similar to that of an amphibian, and Crichton extrapolated from that.
Of course, we now know that the exact opposite was true, and Tyrannosaurus actually had exceptional eyesight, but the science has come a lot further since then.


-Dilophosaurus is of course a big bundle of wrong, in the film at least. As mentioned before, the venom and frill were speculative. As for the size and head shape, this was an honest mistake, based on the designer using the original holotype for reference -
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fqilong.files.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F08%2Fdilophosaurus-as-megalosaurus-wetherilli.jpg%3Fw%3D1102%26amp%3Bh%3D690&hash=c8d8d2c2be74704c45c5846e6d6678280a7e9a0c)
(For anyone who doesn't know, Dilophosaurus was originally thought to be a new species of Megalosaurus.)

This was actually a very common mistake, and my pre-JP dinosaur books also showed Dilophosaurus with a generic carnosaur skull, rather than the pointy, long-toothed coelophysoid skull it actually had.


-All the theropods have pronating 'bunny hands'. We now know that prosauropods and theropods had very inflexible wrists and forearms, particularly with regard to the position of the hands - in other words, holding a basketball, not dribbling it. The dinosaurs right at the avian root (such as Velociraptor) had additional bones which allowed them to bend the hand sideways towards the wrist, but even they couldn't make their palms face the floor without splaying their arms close to 90 degrees.
However, this is based on studies that were published between 2002 and 2008, so even Jurassic Park 3 wasn't inaccurate for its time, in this regard.


-Feathers. We now know that all coelurosaurs - the group that includes Compsognathus, Gallimimus, Tyrannosaurus and Velociraptor - had proto-feathers as the primary integument. It's important to note that 'proto-feather' is a broad-ranging term - compsognathid feathers were very similar to mammalian hair, ornithomimosaurs had fluffy down like a bird chick, dromaeosaurids had proper wing feathers.
Tyrannosaurus itself is probably safe though - multi-ton animals from warm/temperate climates don't need insulation, so if it had any kind of feather, it would have been for display. My guess is that it was scaly all over, and we have found samples of scaly skin in its closest relatives. That said, rex junior would probably have been massively fluffy and cute as a button.

Anyway. The evidence for feathers in dinosaurs didn't really reach a tipping point until Microraptor was described in 2002, after even Jurassic Park 3.


-Finally, cloning dinosaurs from mosquitos trapped in amber. When Crichton wrote Jurassic Park, it was genuinely believed in the scientific community that this was possible. Partial strands of DNA had recently been found in Cretaceous amber, and it was thought it was just a case of finding the right amber, and achieving the understanding of genetics to be able to 'patch' missing base pairs (the vast majority of any genome consists of 'junk' pairs anyway).
Crichton addresses the various other difficulties of cloning a dinosaur in the book.

Anyway, it later turned out that at least some of that Cretaceous DNA was actually a more recent contaminant (there's still a piece of plant matter that my cursory search didn't find any evidence disproving). We've only ever found a couple of mosquitos preserved in Mesozoic amber, and even if we could find one that had recently drunk dinosaur blood, it seems there would almost inevitably be contaminants from the bug itself, even if any of the DNA was preserved, and even if we could figure out how to patch the genome.
Still. This has largely been figured out due to the scrutiny that was placed on the subject after Crichton's writing.
[close]
I love you, man.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 27, 2014, 10:26:02 PM
Now go f**k for a while and leave us in peace. :P ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 27, 2014, 10:31:24 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 10:18:23 PM
Yet you're forgetting the real problem that all these "liberties" contribute to, and that is perpetual ignorance about dinosaurs. People to this day still go to museums and are shocked that Velociraptor wasn't much bigger than a small dog or that Dilophosaurus doesn't have a frill.
Dude, the point I've been trying to make is that if you blame this new film, you also have to blame the original film, because they're doing the same thing!

Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 10:18:23 PM
For crying out loud, the mosasaur from the trailer is bring called a dinosaur, and the film isn't even out yet!
That's not anything new... I've spent my early primary school days telling people how Pterosaurs and Plesiosaurs were not Dinosaurs. It's a widely diffused misconception thanks to horribly dated school textbooks.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 10:18:23 PM
It's not as if people are going to storm out of the theatre if a dinosaur has some plumage on it. I really don't think you're giving audiences any credit at all.
It's not my thinking; it's the filmmakers'. Again, you can't really blame them. Films that take risks not always come out on top.

Quote from: Vertigo on Nov 27, 2014, 10:18:51 PM
The first film was pretty damn accurate based on the science of the late '80s/early '90s.
...but still had its share of (conscious) problems.

Quote from: Vertigo on Nov 27, 2014, 10:18:51 PM
-Dilophosaurus is of course a big bundle of wrong, in the film at least.
There you go.

Quote from: Vertigo on Nov 27, 2014, 10:18:51 PM
My guess is that it was scaly all over, and we have found samples of scaly skin in its closest relatives.
We have T.rex skin impressions too (just saying).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Nov 27, 2014, 10:41:55 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 07:25:30 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Nov 27, 2014, 07:20:56 PM
I've not seen anyone go really uppity about it, just stating their opinion.

The basic point is that the original film balanced accuracy with 'cool'. So did film two. So did film three. So does this. The Mosasaurus as far as I can see is anatomically accurate -- but is oversized. The original T.Rex had small anatomical inaccuracies regardless of the feathers/non-feathers thing. So on and so forth.

Yes, and they could easily have been corrected. Why does a dinosaur need to be inaccurate in order to be "cool"? Dinosaurs are cool just the way they are.

Quote from: Omegazilla on Nov 27, 2014, 07:20:56 PM
'Tail draggers' wouldn't be minded, no, but audience today likes the new fast Dinosaurs. It's what CGI brought in. Fast lethal things. Tail draggers are associated with old Dinosaur movies only Harryhausen fans such as me remember fondly.

I wouldn't be surprised if people were complaining about the elimination of the classic tail-dragging posture, but grew to love the correct posture because it made sense. There's no reason why feathered dinosaurs couldn't or wouldn't have the same effect.

Quote from: Omegazilla on Nov 27, 2014, 07:20:56 PM
You also have to take into account that the JP Dinosaurs have become imprinted in the public imagination much like the Terminator, or Alien, or Robocop have. They're icons.

Except that all of those creatures are wholly fictitious, created in someone's mind. Dinosaurs aren't. Dinosaur design can evolve, just like the science has because dinosaurs were real creatures.

Also, like you said, they've become imprinted in the public imagination, ergo, they have shaped how the general public sees dinosaurs. No reason why that can't change.

Quote from: BANE on Nov 27, 2014, 07:22:30 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 07:18:11 PM
Quote from: BANE on Nov 27, 2014, 07:17:30 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 07:16:08 PM
They're dinosaurs, real or otherwise. There's no actual reason why they can't look like what science tells us. And if that's your reasoning, then I guess you really wouldn't mind if they were all tail-draggers, right?
Feathers look dumb

No feathers looks dumb.
You know you don't actually believe that.

I kinda do. I enjoy seeing how different artists present dinosaurs with plumage. Every illustration is different.

I think both have their appeal. Feathers and no feathers. Tail draggers and not. Although i prefer the JP franchises take, I'd still love to see the more accurate dinosaurs on a big budget movie. But JP should stick to it's designs. It is the signature of it's franchise.

What we really need is Spielberg or another big time director to tackle a new franchise with feathered dinosaurs. Sadly, there's not much room for innovation since the plot would still probably have to be "dinosaurs! Run!" But it could do something that hasn't been done in a long time: be rated R. That would give an edge to the feathered dinosaurs that could appeal to the general audience. It's all very unlikely though, but I wish.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 27, 2014, 10:43:16 PM
A film with up to date Dinosaurs would be absolutely excellent. It wouldn't necessarily have to be a JP-style film... there's a million ways you can use Dinosaurs in film -- about as many as you can use any other animal.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 27, 2014, 10:45:32 PM
Save it for Walking with Dinosaurs 2. hehehehe
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Nov 27, 2014, 10:46:43 PM
To begin with, the species shown in Jurassic Park were mostly from Cretaceaous period, that kind of clears how "scientifically accurate" they care to be  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Nov 27, 2014, 10:51:42 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Nov 27, 2014, 10:41:55 PMWhat we really need is Spielberg or another big time director to tackle a new franchise with feathered dinosaurs. Sadly, there's not much room for innovation since the plot would still probably have to be "dinosaurs! Run!"

Well said. With lots of people talking about it being a "rehash", or "does the franchise need another instalment?" (right or wrong), I'd been thinking along the same lines as you.

I know what I'd personally love to see is dinosaurs being dinosaurs, just chilling out, chomping ferns, taking a nap, playing, socialising, having a scratch, having a drink, chasing each other, dying on a cross to save humanity from its sins. Not being monsters, not anthropomorphised, no cheesy voiceovers. My ideal Jurassic Park would be one in which the dinosaurs never escape and everything goes swimmingly. It perhaps wouldn't make one billion dollars.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ryu on Nov 27, 2014, 10:54:25 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQFQqCn25AA (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQFQqCn25AA)
2:30
Two brains ?! For a respected man who defends the theory of T-REX scavenger. Does Jack Horner to have this phase, shit hint fan?
Chickens are T-rex relatives and they do not have two Brains!
Maybe a long time, he should be fired from being a consultant to the park Jurrassic movies.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 27, 2014, 10:56:52 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Nov 27, 2014, 10:51:42 PM
I know what I'd personally love to see is dinosaurs being dinosaurs, just chilling out, chomping ferns, taking a nap, playing, socialising, having a scratch, having a drink, chasing each other, dying on a cross to save humanity from its sins. Not being monsters, not anthropomorphised, no cheesy voiceovers. My ideal Jurassic Park would be one in which the dinosaurs never escape and everything goes swimmingly. It perhaps wouldn't make one billion dollars.
All of this. 100%.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Nov 27, 2014, 11:26:05 PM
Quote
Chickens are T-rex relatives and they do not have two Brains!

Oh.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Nov 28, 2014, 12:21:06 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHBIo39zpS8#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHBIo39zpS8#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DarthJoker45 on Nov 28, 2014, 12:28:44 AM
Take this with some skepticism, but it appears that a low-quality picture of the D-Rex has leaked. Thanks to comicbookmovie.com  (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=111677) for sharing this.


Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fvlc7cQL.jpg&hash=e3f9b04affd9ae59a2fafd703371f577623fd671)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Nov 28, 2014, 12:30:26 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg3.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20120620140209%2Favp%2Fimages%2F0%2F0c%2FWindow98.PNG&hash=b05af69f0efe5c3c9ac983a48cabfbe5e67e827a)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DarthJoker45 on Nov 28, 2014, 12:34:06 AM
I guess that is your reaction ace.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Nov 28, 2014, 12:36:53 AM
Quote from: DarthJoker45 on Nov 28, 2014, 12:34:06 AM
I guess that is your reaction ace.  :laugh:

Both have similar facial expressions.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DarthJoker45 on Nov 28, 2014, 12:42:02 AM
Now that you mention it, they kind of do.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Nov 28, 2014, 01:35:28 AM
Quote from: DarthJoker45 on Nov 28, 2014, 12:28:44 AM
Take this with some skepticism, but it appears that a low-quality picture of the D-Rex has leaked. Thanks to comicbookmovie.com  (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=111677) for sharing this.


Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fvlc7cQL.jpg&hash=e3f9b04affd9ae59a2fafd703371f577623fd671)
[close]

Chupacabras!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Nov 28, 2014, 02:39:04 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 07:10:13 PM
I'm really curious to know. Why do you folks become so uppity when folks like Vertigo and I maintain that the dinosaurs in a movie should be scientifically accurate?

Who the hell cares? I mean really it's a movie to enjoy. Besides, these are creatures from 65 million years ago. We'll never truely know what they looked like.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 28, 2014, 02:42:16 AM
Could also just be attributed to the frog DNA, if you really want a reason.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Nov 28, 2014, 02:44:29 AM
Looks like T has been in some battles:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jurassicworld.com%2Fmedia%2Fdinosaurs%2Ftyrannosaurus-rex%2Finfo-image.png&hash=237da59d36e94928caa3e9971cddab704d6b10f7)

http://www.jurassicworld.com/dinosaurs/tyrannosaurus-rex/ (http://www.jurassicworld.com/dinosaurs/tyrannosaurus-rex/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Nov 28, 2014, 02:46:40 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Nov 28, 2014, 02:44:29 AM
Looks like T has been in some battles:

http://www.jurassicworld.com/media/dinosaurs/tyrannosaurus-rex/info-image.png

http://www.jurassicworld.com/dinosaurs/tyrannosaurus-rex/ (http://www.jurassicworld.com/dinosaurs/tyrannosaurus-rex/)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F7tLHDh7.gif&hash=f5780751a103ddffd617c58c0f3ddde203922333)
f**king amazing. :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 28, 2014, 02:47:42 AM
I wonder if they moved any of the dinos over from the other island when they opened the park, like the original intentions were, or if everything here was bred specifically for JW?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 28, 2014, 02:49:53 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Nov 27, 2014, 10:31:24 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 10:18:23 PM
Yet you're forgetting the real problem that all these "liberties" contribute to, and that is perpetual ignorance about dinosaurs. People to this day still go to museums and are shocked that Velociraptor wasn't much bigger than a small dog or that Dilophosaurus doesn't have a frill.
Dude, the point I've been trying to make is that if you blame this new film, you also have to blame the original film, because they're doing the same thing!

Yup, I do blame the original film to some degree. I'm perhaps the biggest Jurassic Park fan on this entire forum but I'm not blind to the film's issues.

Quote from: Omegazilla on Nov 27, 2014, 10:31:24 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 27, 2014, 10:18:23 PM
For crying out loud, the mosasaur from the trailer is bring called a dinosaur, and the film isn't even out yet!
That's not anything new... I've spent my early primary school days telling people how Pterosaurs and Plesiosaurs were not Dinosaurs. It's a widely diffused misconception thanks to horribly dated school textbooks.

Yet adults of today still make this mistake when really, they should know better. I'm not expecting them to have in-depth knowledge of taxonomy and such but f**k, it ain't a freaking dinosaur!!!

Quote from: Omegazilla on Nov 27, 2014, 10:56:52 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Nov 27, 2014, 10:51:42 PM
I know what I'd personally love to see is dinosaurs being dinosaurs, just chilling out, chomping ferns, taking a nap, playing, socialising, having a scratch, having a drink, chasing each other, dying on a cross to save humanity from its sins. Not being monsters, not anthropomorphised, no cheesy voiceovers. My ideal Jurassic Park would be one in which the dinosaurs never escape and everything goes swimmingly. It perhaps wouldn't make one billion dollars.
All of this. 100%.

Same.

Quote from: KiramidHead on Nov 27, 2014, 10:26:02 PM
Now go f**k for a while and leave us in peace. :P ;D

Maybe we will!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Nov 28, 2014, 02:50:13 AM
http://www.jurassicworld.com/park-map/ (http://www.jurassicworld.com/park-map/)

cool interactive part of the site

Map shows golf course, I hope there is a scene where someone is about to make a hole in one and a dino comes in and picks the ball up, steps on, etc before it goes in, lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Nov 28, 2014, 03:02:55 AM
I swear that's the T. Rex from the first film, the scars are in the same place as the scratches the last raptor it kills left on it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Nov 28, 2014, 03:45:29 AM
Must watch!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbgPETJ-J9E#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbgPETJ-J9E#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Nov 28, 2014, 04:28:49 AM
Thanks for the vid, Hubbs :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Nov 28, 2014, 04:30:56 AM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Nov 28, 2014, 03:02:55 AM
I swear that's the T. Rex from the first film, the scars are in the same place as the scratches the last raptor it kills left on it.

... mind blown.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Nov 28, 2014, 04:54:58 AM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Nov 28, 2014, 03:02:55 AM
I swear that's the T. Rex from the first film, the scars are in the same place as the scratches the last raptor it kills left on it.

I was about to mention this! I saw the scars and those look like the same locations where the raptors got her. It's awesome if it is the same one :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Nov 28, 2014, 05:54:19 AM
Aghhh that's a wicked catch King Rathalos.

Also, I'm going to guess that all the dinosaurs/prehistoric reptiles named there are all the ones that are going to be seen in the film, with the deliberate exception of the new D. rex, or the Velociraptors (which would understandably be regarded as too dangerous to be shown to the public, or used only as the park's 'trained force', or perhaps both). 

It would be cool if the Dilophosaurus made an appearance as well (what if they rectified the small size of the one shown in Jurassic Park by showing a full size version of the same specimen that ate Nedry in this film too?  Maybe in the "Restricted" part of the island).  Then again, there are more than enough dinosaurs listed here.  I like how they list Metriacanthosaurus, one of the vials Nedry tried to steal.

Exceptionally made site; I'm going to have some fun with the interactive map now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 28, 2014, 05:55:41 AM
Maybe it swam to Sorna and learned the mystic ways of the Steven Seagal neck snap from the Spino. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Wrecktangle on Nov 28, 2014, 09:20:33 AM
Looks too... clean. Not sold on mutant spliced dinosaurs either.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on Nov 28, 2014, 10:10:08 AM
Quote from: DarthJoker45 on Nov 28, 2014, 12:28:44 AM
Take this with some skepticism, but it appears that a low-quality picture of the D-Rex has leaked. Thanks to comicbookmovie.com  (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=111677) for sharing this.


Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fvlc7cQL.jpg&hash=e3f9b04affd9ae59a2fafd703371f577623fd671)
[close]

I've serious doubts if this is legit... it just looks so... awkward... maybe it's just the pixles  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Nov 28, 2014, 10:13:31 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FQOi59ZR.png&hash=5a395165fcf593ae9a73ae44b376fdec1015419d)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FOEIuW5J.jpg&hash=3e47f481e7efeb5f98abd3ac21aa7a6d7d0299aa)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: jacc.90 on Nov 28, 2014, 11:00:50 AM
HE
IS
BACK !

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimageshack.com%2Fa%2Fimg537%2F566%2FNP0pMr.jpg&hash=a886968caf1b1518a726bb57b7d3728a9167f659)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: worldpeace on Nov 28, 2014, 11:12:27 AM
it is very modern looking and sleek. looks much more violant too. loving the giant sea reptile . too bad they didn't add feathers to the raptors.

Quote from: Wrecktangle on Nov 28, 2014, 09:20:33 AM
Looks too... clean. Not sold on mutant spliced dinosaurs either.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 28, 2014, 12:51:51 PM
Quote from: Hubbs on Nov 28, 2014, 03:45:29 AM
Must watch!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbgPETJ-J9E#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbgPETJ-J9E#ws)

Fun debate. But the director is a fool. I figure he'd understand that A) not everything can be practical and B) the CGI is still unfinished.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: AvatarIII on Nov 28, 2014, 01:40:39 PM
Quote from: Tangakkai on Nov 28, 2014, 10:10:08 AM
Quote from: DarthJoker45 on Nov 28, 2014, 12:28:44 AM
Take this with some skepticism, but it appears that a low-quality picture of the D-Rex has leaked. Thanks to comicbookmovie.com  (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=111677) for sharing this.


Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fvlc7cQL.jpg&hash=e3f9b04affd9ae59a2fafd703371f577623fd671)
[close]

I've serious doubts if this is legit... it just looks so... awkward... maybe it's just the pixles  :laugh:

It looks legit to me, based on the lego leak

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.kinja-img.com%2Fgawker-media%2Fimage%2Fupload%2Fs--_BmDu8Mb--%2Fc_fit%2Cfl_progressive%2Cq_80%2Cw_636%2Fqwacwbagrf63qtarhysq.jpg&hash=7ce6d59198b60ccdf6b82bea48e6bef74350a49e)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Nov 28, 2014, 02:22:43 PM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Nov 28, 2014, 04:30:56 AM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Nov 28, 2014, 03:02:55 AM
I swear that's the T. Rex from the first film, the scars are in the same place as the scratches the last raptor it kills left on it.

... mind blown.

Now that I think about it...

I'm calling it. The T-rex in Jurassic World is the original, albeit older, and she will be the hero dinosaur of the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 28, 2014, 02:38:49 PM
I wonder if ole Spinosaurus will be making another return.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Nov 28, 2014, 02:40:45 PM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Nov 28, 2014, 02:22:43 PM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Nov 28, 2014, 04:30:56 AM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Nov 28, 2014, 03:02:55 AM
I swear that's the T. Rex from the first film, the scars are in the same place as the scratches the last raptor it kills left on it.

... mind blown.

Now that I think about it...

I'm calling it. The T-rex in Jurassic World is the original, albeit older, and she will be the hero dinosaur of the movie.

Kiss me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Nov 28, 2014, 03:33:59 PM
It makes perfect sense. The T-rex is apparently the washed up older attraction no one cares about anymore, hence the hybrid. Having the original Rex be the hero at the end reestablishes her dominance, especially after what happened in JP3. Having the original Rex gives fans of the first film an emotional center to a film that is essentially a reboot.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 28, 2014, 03:52:04 PM
I like the idea, but I foresee a rip-off of the final roar moment in JP following it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Nov 28, 2014, 03:53:05 PM
Good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Nov 28, 2014, 03:53:30 PM
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fvlc7cQL.jpg&hash=e3f9b04affd9ae59a2fafd703371f577623fd671)
[close]

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg2.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20130922115612%2Faliens%2Fimages%2Fb%2Fb1%2FDeacon_alien_prometheus_born.jpg&hash=b0785c2d7d4dcd933e63991f8b59045d9f82c401)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Nov 29, 2014, 02:00:53 AM
Quote from: AvatarIII on Nov 28, 2014, 01:40:39 PM
Quote from: Tangakkai on Nov 28, 2014, 10:10:08 AM
Quote from: DarthJoker45 on Nov 28, 2014, 12:28:44 AM
Take this with some skepticism, but it appears that a low-quality picture of the D-Rex has leaked. Thanks to comicbookmovie.com  (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=111677) for sharing this.


Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fvlc7cQL.jpg&hash=e3f9b04affd9ae59a2fafd703371f577623fd671)
[close]

I've serious doubts if this is legit... it just looks so... awkward... maybe it's just the pixles  :laugh:

It looks legit to me, based on the lego leak

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.kinja-img.com%2Fgawker-media%2Fimage%2Fupload%2Fs--_BmDu8Mb--%2Fc_fit%2Cfl_progressive%2Cq_80%2Cw_636%2Fqwacwbagrf63qtarhysq.jpg&hash=7ce6d59198b60ccdf6b82bea48e6bef74350a49e)
[close]

Well the hands/fingers look the same as in the leaked trailer with the alternate footage, I guess its the real thing, looking cool
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Nov 29, 2014, 03:04:09 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 28, 2014, 03:52:04 PM
I like the idea, but I foresee a rip-off of the final roar moment in JP following it.

We can only hope so
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Nov 29, 2014, 04:08:49 AM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Nov 28, 2014, 02:22:43 PM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Nov 28, 2014, 04:30:56 AM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Nov 28, 2014, 03:02:55 AM
I swear that's the T. Rex from the first film, the scars are in the same place as the scratches the last raptor it kills left on it.

... mind blown.

Now that I think about it...

I'm calling it. The T-rex in Jurassic World is the original, albeit older, and she will be the hero dinosaur of the movie.

I can see it too...and it sounds lame! and yeah this is totally a reboot in disguise.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Nov 29, 2014, 04:23:56 AM
Quote from: Hubbs on Nov 29, 2014, 04:08:49 AM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Nov 28, 2014, 02:22:43 PM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Nov 28, 2014, 04:30:56 AM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Nov 28, 2014, 03:02:55 AM
I swear that's the T. Rex from the first film, the scars are in the same place as the scratches the last raptor it kills left on it.

... mind blown.

Now that I think about it...

I'm calling it. The T-rex in Jurassic World is the original, albeit older, and she will be the hero dinosaur of the movie.

I can see it too...and it sounds amaze! and yeah this is totally a reboot in disguise.

Fixed. And this movie has stated from the beginning that it is a reboot, even though it's a sequel as well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Nov 29, 2014, 04:32:17 AM
If it's a sequel then it is not a reboot by any means, just a relaunch.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Nov 29, 2014, 04:38:36 AM
Quote from: Magegg on Nov 29, 2014, 04:32:17 AM
If it's a sequel then it is not a reboot by any means, just a relaunch.

Its a bootquel  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Nov 29, 2014, 05:41:01 AM
Quote from: Magegg on Nov 29, 2014, 04:32:17 AM
If it's a sequel then it is not a reboot by any means, just a relaunch.

Says who? Lol I used "sequel" very loosely. Yes it's after the events of the first movies, but since it's introducing new characters and focusing on them, and since it's using a familiar concept but using new ideas to revitalize a pretty much dormant franchise, then yeah it's a reboot. A "sequel" can be a reboot at the same time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 29, 2014, 05:48:36 AM
Reboot is an umbrella term for many conceptual series additions.


I hate that term.


Almost as much as Kaiju.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 29, 2014, 05:53:54 AM
But kaiju has a consistent usage that actually makes sense. People seem to label anything a reboot that isn't a completely, totally, direct sequel that picks up right the f**k where the last one left off. I still resist labeling First Class a reboot.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Nov 29, 2014, 06:00:39 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Nov 29, 2014, 05:41:01 AMSays who? Lol I used "sequel" very loosely. Yes it's after the events of the first movies, but since it's introducing new characters and focusing on them, and since it's using a familiar concept but using new ideas to revitalize a pretty much dormant franchise, then yeah it's a reboot. A "sequel" can be a reboot at the same time.
No, it can't. If it's set in the same continuity, then it's not a reboot.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bender1988 on Nov 29, 2014, 06:13:32 AM
If the picture is legit then I must say i am not to hot on the D-rex design, opinion may change when seen in the movie doing stuff...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 29, 2014, 07:00:23 AM
https://twitter.com/JurassicWorld_/status/538539979488919552 (https://twitter.com/JurassicWorld_/status/538539979488919552)

Oh yes. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Nov 29, 2014, 07:02:05 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Nov 29, 2014, 07:00:23 AM
https://twitter.com/JurassicWorld_/status/538539979488919552 (https://twitter.com/JurassicWorld_/status/538539979488919552)

Oh yes. 8)

Aw shit, I was right. :o 8) ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Nov 29, 2014, 07:24:36 AM
WHY.

She's TASTED human flesh.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 29, 2014, 10:08:07 AM
It's not the official Twitter though.

But I DO hope it's the original Tyrannosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Nov 29, 2014, 10:46:18 AM
99% sure, personally. The scars are in the right spot, the head shape's the same, and unlike the Lost World rexes, it has the same colour scheme.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 29, 2014, 10:58:30 AM
Yup! They didn't put the scars there just to look cool, I am sure.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 29, 2014, 12:05:28 PM
The Queen of Nublar.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B3g3-GBIEAAPEhp.png)

Quote from: Omegazilla on Nov 29, 2014, 10:08:07 AM
It's not the official Twitter though.

It's from the official site...

http://www.JurassicWorld.com (http://www.jurassicworld.com)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on Nov 29, 2014, 12:16:48 PM
Just saw on the website they have a section Baryonyx and a Suchomimus... what for? Those two almost look identical. Would have preferred a bit more diversity with another Theropod, like the Carnotaur/Acrocantosaurus... or maybe another water reptile like the Plesiosaurus.

Got ghoosebumps though from seeing the T-Rex   8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Nov 29, 2014, 12:27:36 PM
I think Suchomimus is in there to explain that line in Jurassic Park 3 which implies it was on "InGen's list". Baryonyx is there because it was on JP's tour brochure, they've brought back all the Nublar species.

:Edit: ...except for Herrerasaurus, Proceratosaurus and Segisaurus, and possibly Brachiosaurus and Compsognathus. Huh. I guess they just really like spinosaurids.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 29, 2014, 12:31:41 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 29, 2014, 12:05:28 PM

It's from the official site...

http://www.JurassicWorld.com (http://www.jurassicworld.com)
Yes, the image is, but not the twit that confirms it.

Quote from: Tangakkai on Nov 29, 2014, 12:16:48 PM
Just saw on the website they have a section Baryonyx and a Suchomimus... what for? Those two almost look identical. Would have preferred a bit more diversity with another Theropod, like the Carnotaur/Acrocantosaurus... or maybe another water reptile like the Plesiosaurus.
Shhhh, we all need more Suchomimus in our lives.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on Nov 29, 2014, 12:53:29 PM
Alright Omega, I can live with that argument in mind.   :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Nov 29, 2014, 05:46:21 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Nov 29, 2014, 10:46:18 AM
99% sure, personally. The scars are in the right spot, the head shape's the same, and unlike the Lost World rexes, it has the same colour scheme.

I know the movies didn't mention life spans so they can get away with it, but by book standards it shouldn't have lasted this long no? I'm fine with them taking this liberty though I'm just curious. Glad she's back  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Nov 29, 2014, 06:25:16 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Nov 29, 2014, 05:46:21 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Nov 29, 2014, 10:46:18 AM
99% sure, personally. The scars are in the right spot, the head shape's the same, and unlike the Lost World rexes, it has the same colour scheme.

I know the movies didn't mention life spans do they can get away with it, but by book standards it shouldn't have lasted this long no? I'm fine with them taking this liberty though I'm just curious. Glad she's back  8)

Well the whole question of JP dinosaur lifespans is murky, I don't remember it being addressed in the book or film. In real life, Tyrannosaurus grew up at a similar rate to us, reaching full size in their mid-teens, and I'm pretty sure InGen weren't supposed to have cloned a dinosaur in the 1970s. I dimly remember reading somewhere that JP's bigger dinosaurs were supposed to reach maturity in around 5 years, I don't know if this was based on now-outdated research (as with most of JP1's errors) or if their growth rates were artificially accelerated.

Anyway. The oldest known Tyrannosaurus died at 28, but had been surviving with numerous crippling injuries, so could potentially have lived a lot longer. Tyrannosaurs lived horrifyingly stressful lives, reasonably-complete specimens are typically riddled with deep injuries and infection sites.
So, if you had a solitary animal living in captivity, being fed goats, the upper limit for their lifespan could have been vastly longer. I tried working out an estimate a few years back, using big cats as a reference (which similarly lead brutal lives in the wild), and figured they'd probably have an upper range in the 40s.

...I'm getting sidetracked again. Ok, five second Google search, movie-canon-wise InGen was founded in the '80s, putting Tyrannosaurus at 3-13 years old in the movie. This makes it 25-35 in JW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Nov 29, 2014, 07:08:23 PM
The old age would also explain the lighter brown color. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Nov 29, 2014, 08:04:44 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Nov 29, 2014, 06:25:16 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Nov 29, 2014, 05:46:21 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Nov 29, 2014, 10:46:18 AM
99% sure, personally. The scars are in the right spot, the head shape's the same, and unlike the Lost World rexes, it has the same colour scheme.

I know the movies didn't mention life spans do they can get away with it, but by book standards it shouldn't have lasted this long no? I'm fine with them taking this liberty though I'm just curious. Glad she's back  8)

Well the whole question of JP dinosaur lifespans is murky, I don't remember it being addressed in the book or film. In real life, Tyrannosaurus grew up at a similar rate to us, reaching full size in their mid-teens, and I'm pretty sure InGen weren't supposed to have cloned a dinosaur in the 1970s. I dimly remember reading somewhere that JP's bigger dinosaurs were supposed to reach maturity in around 5 years, I don't know if this was based on now-outdated research (as with most of JP1's errors) or if their growth rates were artificially accelerated.

Anyway. The oldest known Tyrannosaurus died at 28, but had been surviving with numerous crippling injuries, so could potentially have lived a lot longer. Tyrannosaurs lived horrifyingly stressful lives, reasonably-complete specimens are typically riddled with deep injuries and infection sites.
So, if you had a solitary animal living in captivity, being fed goats, the upper limit for their lifespan could have been vastly longer. I tried working out an estimate a few years back, using big cats as a reference (which similarly lead brutal lives in the wild), and figured they'd probably have an upper range in the 40s.

...I'm getting sidetracked again. Ok, five second Google search, movie-canon-wise InGen was founded in the '80s, putting Tyrannosaurus at 3-13 years old in the movie. This makes it 25-35 in JW.

It's been about a year since I haven't re-read Jurassic Park so I guess I'll do that again lol I think they do mention life spans but I think it was generalized to all the dinosaurs, which doesn't make much sense. But I don't know maybe I'm remembering things wrong.

Guess I'll finally open this up  ;D

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xap1/t31.0-8/704121_385606374853411_829852719_o.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 30, 2014, 12:39:59 AM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/style-blog/wp/2014/11/29/a-smithsonian-paleontologist-fact-checked-the-jurassic-world-trailer-his-take-meh/

I love you, Hans. Vertigo, check this out!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Nov 30, 2014, 01:59:46 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 30, 2014, 12:39:59 AM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/style-blog/wp/2014/11/29/a-smithsonian-paleontologist-fact-checked-the-jurassic-world-trailer-his-take-meh/ (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/style-blog/wp/2014/11/29/a-smithsonian-paleontologist-fact-checked-the-jurassic-world-trailer-his-take-meh/)

I love you, Hans. Vertigo, check this out!
Wish people would just let it go already.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 30, 2014, 02:50:20 AM
Why?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Nov 30, 2014, 02:53:47 AM
Because the movie has already made its decision to keep the iconic designs. If people want authenticity they should just watch that new walking with dinosaurs movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Nov 30, 2014, 02:54:21 AM
But it was a shit movie  :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Nov 30, 2014, 02:56:11 AM
Watch the voiceless version.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Nov 30, 2014, 04:41:23 AM
Quote from: frenchfries on Nov 30, 2014, 02:53:47 AM
Because the movie has already made its decision to keep the iconic designs. If people want authenticity they should just watch that new walking with dinosaurs movie.

Yeah I agree. I grow tired of seeing this argument over and over again  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 30, 2014, 05:27:38 AM
Awwww, people are talking about something you don't agree with?

Too bad.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Nov 30, 2014, 05:53:26 AM
Basically people are nitpicking at this point and its pointless. Accurate dinos would only work in a straight up remake.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Nov 30, 2014, 06:23:01 AM
It's a matter of logical consistency. If the previous movies depicted the dinosaurs as non-feathered, these new ones cannot change that since it would contradict the previous entries, so, deal with it, this is a fictional universe.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Nov 30, 2014, 10:07:00 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 30, 2014, 05:27:38 AM
Awwww, people are talking about something you don't agree with?

Too bad.

Oh I agree with it. Still tiring, specially because I'm fine with the inaccuracies.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 30, 2014, 01:14:47 PM
Quote from: Magegg on Nov 30, 2014, 06:23:01 AM
It's a matter of logical consistency. If the previous movies depicted the dinosaurs as non-feathered, these new ones cannot change that since it would contradict the previous entries, so, deal with it, this is a fictional universe.

It's a new park which means it's a new chapter in this universe. There's no reason why they couldn't give us proper dinosaurs and say something like, "We've extracted full genetic codes and don't need frogs" or something like that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: AvatarIII on Nov 30, 2014, 04:39:22 PM
Jurassic Park 3 had feathered dinos remember. they weren't very feathery, but it was a start. they could have just slowly added more and more feathers per sequel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 30, 2014, 05:10:49 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FSNeaLHP.gif&hash=d71febb44d08164078e0591695f80d95a81dd344)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Nov 30, 2014, 05:34:44 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 30, 2014, 01:14:47 PM
Quote from: Magegg on Nov 30, 2014, 06:23:01 AM
It's a matter of logical consistency. If the previous movies depicted the dinosaurs as non-feathered, these new ones cannot change that since it would contradict the previous entries, so, deal with it, this is a fictional universe.

It's a new park which means it's a new chapter in this universe. There's no reason why they couldn't give us proper dinosaurs and say something like, "We've extracted full genetic codes and don't need frogs" or something like that.
But yet, they can get away without it. This is a fictional universe set in the same continuity of a scientifically-dated dinosaur movie. So, who cares about making it scientifically accurate?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 30, 2014, 06:21:54 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on Nov 30, 2014, 04:39:22 PM
Jurassic Park 3 had feathered dinos remember. they weren't very feathery, but it was a start. they could have just slowly added more and more feathers per sequel.

That's not a bad idea, actually.

Quote from: Magegg on Nov 30, 2014, 05:34:44 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 30, 2014, 01:14:47 PM
Quote from: Magegg on Nov 30, 2014, 06:23:01 AM
It's a matter of logical consistency. If the previous movies depicted the dinosaurs as non-feathered, these new ones cannot change that since it would contradict the previous entries, so, deal with it, this is a fictional universe.

It's a new park which means it's a new chapter in this universe. There's no reason why they couldn't give us proper dinosaurs and say something like, "We've extracted full genetic codes and don't need frogs" or something like that.
But yet, they can get away without it. This is a fictional universe set in the same continuity of a scientifically-dated dinosaur movie. So, who cares about making it scientifically accurate?

The people who actually know what dinosaurs are, especially when the first film was semi-accurate for its time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Nov 30, 2014, 06:27:02 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 30, 2014, 01:14:47 PM
Quote from: Magegg on Nov 30, 2014, 06:23:01 AM
It's a matter of logical consistency. If the previous movies depicted the dinosaurs as non-feathered, these new ones cannot change that since it would contradict the previous entries, so, deal with it, this is a fictional universe.

It's a new park which means it's a new chapter in this universe. There's no reason why they couldn't give us proper dinosaurs and say something like, "We've extracted full genetic codes and don't need frogs" or something like that.

I like this idea.  Then we could have both dinosaurs from the first Jurassic Park make an appearance anyway too.  But honestly guys

please stop arguing about this

pls
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 30, 2014, 06:29:23 PM
Quote from: MrSpaceJockey on Nov 30, 2014, 06:27:02 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 30, 2014, 01:14:47 PM
Quote from: Magegg on Nov 30, 2014, 06:23:01 AM
It's a matter of logical consistency. If the previous movies depicted the dinosaurs as non-feathered, these new ones cannot change that since it would contradict the previous entries, so, deal with it, this is a fictional universe.

It's a new park which means it's a new chapter in this universe. There's no reason why they couldn't give us proper dinosaurs and say something like, "We've extracted full genetic codes and don't need frogs" or something like that.

I like this idea.  Then we could have both dinosaurs from the first Jurassic Park make an appearance anyway too.

Even that's not bad. It would be a way to compare the old designs to the new ones.

In regards to JP 3...I'm going to go with the belief that because Site B had dinos living on their own, they were able to evolve into their natural forms, free of inGen's control.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dk6kJGU_Qng#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dk6kJGU_Qng#ws)

He referenced AvP:R, lol.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 30, 2014, 09:51:16 PM
http://dinogoss.blogspot.ca/2014/11/is-jurassic-world-stealing-from.html (http://dinogoss.blogspot.ca/2014/11/is-jurassic-world-stealing-from.html)

QuoteSorry for the clickbait title. The answer is yes. Yes they are.

It's one thing when toy companies do it.

It's quite another when a big-budget Hollywood movie starts stealing the work of independent paleoartists and illustrators for use in their production design.

Not cool :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Nov 30, 2014, 10:11:38 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 30, 2014, 06:29:23 PM
Quote from: MrSpaceJockey on Nov 30, 2014, 06:27:02 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 30, 2014, 01:14:47 PM
Quote from: Magegg on Nov 30, 2014, 06:23:01 AM
It's a matter of logical consistency. If the previous movies depicted the dinosaurs as non-feathered, these new ones cannot change that since it would contradict the previous entries, so, deal with it, this is a fictional universe.

It's a new park which means it's a new chapter in this universe. There's no reason why they couldn't give us proper dinosaurs and say something like, "We've extracted full genetic codes and don't need frogs" or something like that.

I like this idea.  Then we could have both dinosaurs from the first Jurassic Park make an appearance anyway too.

Even that's not bad. It would be a way to compare the old designs to the new ones.

In regards to JP 3...I'm going to go with the belief that because Site B had dinos living on their own, they were able to evolve into their natural forms, free of inGen's control.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dk6kJGU_Qng#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dk6kJGU_Qng#ws)

He referenced AvP:R, lol.
That doesn't make any sense.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 30, 2014, 10:13:00 PM
...how can things evolve in the span of little less than a decade?

The JPIII guys were a different breed, obviously. Either a subspecies, other species, or what have you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 30, 2014, 10:14:22 PM
Maybe they were growing on their own from when they were hatchlings? Site B was used as a breeding ground, remember that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Nov 30, 2014, 10:15:46 PM
...Yeah, but Evolution doesn't quite work like that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Nov 30, 2014, 10:45:10 PM
I think the whole feathered debate is stupid. We had other movies with Dinosaurs like Disney's Dinosaur (2000), Land of the Lost (2009) and Godzilla (2014, he's a dinosaur in the movie) and no one bitch about them not having feathers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 30, 2014, 11:36:30 PM
Disney's Dinosaur was made before the relationship between dinosaurs and birds came into where it is now, Land of the Lost, well who really cares about that movie, and Godzilla isn't a dinosaur, capital D. He's simply a remnant of the Mesozoic.

Also, http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10956-006-9001-y (http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10956-006-9001-y)

QuoteResearchers who have investigated the public understanding of science have argued that fictional cinema and television has proven to be particularly effective at blurring the distinction between fact and fiction. The rationale for this study lies in the notion that to teach science effectively, educators need to understand how popular culture influences their students' perception and understanding of science. Using naturalistic research methods in a diverse middle school we found that students who watched a popular science fiction film, The Core, had a number of misunderstandings of earth science concepts when compared to students who did not watch the movie. We found that a single viewing of a science fiction film can negatively impact student ideas regarding scientific phenomena. Specifically, we found that the film leveraged the scientific authority of the main character, coupled with scientifically correct explanations of some basic earth science, to create a series of plausible, albeit unscientific, ideas that made sense to students.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Dec 01, 2014, 12:17:46 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 30, 2014, 06:29:23 PMIn regards to JP 3...I'm going to go with the belief that because Site B had dinos living on their own, they were able to evolve into their natural forms, free of inGen's control.

In the first novel, only the wild-born raptors were able to change colour. Pretty sure Crichton's intention was that the second-generation animals (not lab-born, in other words) were the authentic, natural state, which I think is what you're getting at.



(Slightly ninja'd on the following)

Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Nov 30, 2014, 10:45:10 PM
I think the whole feathered debate is stupid. We had other movies with Dinosaurs like Disney's Dinosaur (2000), Land of the Lost (2009) and Godzilla (2014, he's a dinosaur in the movie) and no one bitch about them not having feathers.

Disney's Dinosaur is pre-Microraptor, at that point there was still conjecture that the bristly structures we kept finding on coelurosaurs could have just been stacks of collagen fibre.
Land of the Lost was so widely panned that animal plausibility was the least of its problems. It's taken me ten minutes just to find a picture of their dromaeosaur, and I don't think the whole of the internet contains a cap of their Compsognathus.
Godzilla isn't a dinosaur (not in the American and original versions anyway, I can't speak for the rest of the series). The last film had him as a member of a reptile group that evolved to subsist on radiation.

Anyway. The whole reason why there's any upset about this is that it's Jurassic Park. This follows up a film that changed the way the world envisaged dinosaurs, publicised the latest research, created a huge boom of researchers that's propelled the science forward further in 20 years than the previous hundred, and which (originally) strove for such a degree of scientific accuracy that they brought the world's most famous palaeontologist onto the production. It's held to a higher standard than a comedy or fantasy movie, and is all part of the reason that first film was the highest-grossing non-Cameron production of the 20th century - millions of people across the planet wanted to see authentic dinosaurs.

But yeah, honestly, I'm getting tired of arguing about it. I'll still see the movie, Jurassic Park's one of my favourite films of all time. Even if JW's universally panned, I'll still be in that cinema. It'll have to be the Godfather of genetically modified bullshittasaur movies to get me in there more than once, though. And I'll probably always look at it as the movie which sold the original's soul down the creek, even if it does open with Chris Pratt taking requests on this, the day of his daughter's wedding.

Not going to bother saying anything else on the subject though, at least until I've seen it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Dec 01, 2014, 12:24:41 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Dec 01, 2014, 12:17:46 AMAnd I'll probably always look at it as the movie which sold the original's soul down the creek,

NO FEATHERS = NO SOUL :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Dec 01, 2014, 12:28:57 AM
*Claps very, very slowly.*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 01, 2014, 12:49:56 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Dec 01, 2014, 12:17:46 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 30, 2014, 06:29:23 PMIn regards to JP 3...I'm going to go with the belief that because Site B had dinos living on their own, they were able to evolve into their natural forms, free of inGen's control.

In the first novel, only the wild-born raptors were able to change colour. Pretty sure Crichton's intention was that the second-generation animals (not lab-born, in other words) were the authentic, natural state, which I think is what you're getting at.

Yes, thank you :)

Quote from: Vertigo on Dec 01, 2014, 12:17:46 AM
Anyway. The whole reason why there's any upset about this is that it's Jurassic Park. This follows up a film that changed the way the world envisaged dinosaurs, publicised the latest research, created a huge boom of researchers that's propelled the science forward further in 20 years than the previous hundred, and which (originally) strove for such a degree of scientific accuracy that they brought the world's most famous palaeontologist onto the production. It's held to a higher standard than a comedy or fantasy movie, and is all part of the reason that first film was the highest-grossing non-Cameron production of the 20th century - millions of people across the planet wanted to see authentic dinosaurs.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg3.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20110705203442%2Fglee%2Fimages%2F3%2F38%2FOrson-welles-clapping.gif&hash=975d87cd6a84be001ebb7c5e74767769b22a689d)

Quote from: Vertigo on Dec 01, 2014, 12:17:46 AMChris Pratt taking requests on this, the day of his daughter's wedding.

Was that a Family Guy reference?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Dec 01, 2014, 01:14:20 AM
I couldn't remember if it was Family Guy or The Simpsons, just the ancestral root.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Dec 01, 2014, 02:27:34 AM
I for one am glad that they decided to stick with designs that i fell in love with as a kid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Dec 01, 2014, 03:37:10 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Dec 01, 2014, 12:24:41 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Dec 01, 2014, 12:17:46 AMAnd I'll probably always look at it as the movie which sold the original's soul down the creek,

NO FEATHERS = NO SOUL :laugh:

Yeah that was pretty ridiculous xD It hasn't sold it's soul. The dinosaurs were hybrids in the original already. Just not so predominantly. And the park being open was Hammond's dream. Feels more connected to the original than the other two sequels.

Definitely feels like the franchise FOUND it's soul again, even though some changes (or lack thereof) were implemented for this day and age.

I mean the movie can very well still suck but it's heart is in the right place. Even with the hybridization, since it's a logical next step considering the history of the franchise and it's emphasis on genetic engineering.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Dec 01, 2014, 04:06:24 PM
Quote from: frenchfries on Dec 01, 2014, 02:27:34 AM
I for one am glad that they decided to stick with designs that i fell in love with as a kid.
Yeap. This is all you need to know. If it's not broken, don't fix it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Deathbearer on Dec 01, 2014, 04:46:54 PM
I really want Jurassic World to be good. I want to go in and love it like I love the first one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Dec 01, 2014, 11:23:25 PM
So where do you all think a sequel would go after this film?

Obviously it's hard to say because we don't know how this one ends, but the movie is probably following the same structure as the first one. Everything is fine, Hybrid escapes and runs amok as well as the other dinos I'm assuming, people die, and they escape the island after probably killing the hybrid.

assuming they don't decide to bomb the island to get rid of the them once and for all, where do you all think the next installment should or would go, or should this be the last film in the franchise?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Dec 01, 2014, 11:24:07 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.toonopedia.com%2Fxenozoic.jpg&hash=5d015824f16efc6790161639781f695b9ab4644a)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Dec 01, 2014, 11:27:32 PM
Hahaha oh god please no  :D :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 01, 2014, 11:32:09 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Dec 01, 2014, 11:23:25 PM
So where do you all think a sequel would go after this film?

space
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Dec 01, 2014, 11:43:04 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Dec 01, 2014, 11:23:25 PM
So where do you all think a sequel would go after this film?

Obviously it's hard to say because we don't know how this one ends, but the movie is probably following the same structure as the first one. Everything is fine, Hybrid escapes and runs amok as well as the other dinos I'm assuming, people die, and they escape the island after probably killing the hybrid.

assuming they don't decide to bomb the island to get rid of the them once and for all, where do you all think the next installment should or would go, or should this be the last film in the franchise?

They'll most likely expand on the "trained raptor" + the "hybrid" idea and give us a revamped version of the original Jurassic Park 4 script. Think "Island of Dr. Moreau" meets "Moonraker". With stuff like this:

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.mos.totalfilm.com%2Fimages%2Fa%2Fabandoned-jurassic-park-concept-art-reveals-human-dinosaur-hybrids-117266-07-470-75.jpg&hash=3702c76c5ec66c74fb4f8b5a4e5080bd894e35d5)
[close]

I bet ya 3 fiddy.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Dec 01, 2014, 11:43:26 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 01, 2014, 11:32:09 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Dec 01, 2014, 11:23:25 PM
So where do you all think a sequel would go after this film?

space
Yay! Jurassic Universe! :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Dec 01, 2014, 11:44:21 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 01, 2014, 11:32:09 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Dec 01, 2014, 11:23:25 PM
So where do you all think a sequel would go after this film?

space

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ffshrine.org%2Fxbox-iso%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F11%2Fdinocri3.jpg&hash=e0a297adbd020255d0f8c673b6bb80bfd99ec8d1)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Dec 02, 2014, 12:05:17 AM
Hopefully not the human-dino hybrids, but most likely something with dinosaurs as Bio Weapons.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Dec 02, 2014, 12:09:27 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Dec 01, 2014, 11:44:21 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 01, 2014, 11:32:09 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Dec 01, 2014, 11:23:25 PM
So where do you all think a sequel would go after this film?

space

http://www.ffshrine.org/xbox-iso/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/dinocri3.jpg

NO GOD PLASE ANYTHING BUT THAT
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 02, 2014, 06:03:55 AM
Call me crazy but a stand-alone film based on that thing would be so very cool.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Dec 02, 2014, 01:12:51 PM
on "what thing"? dinohumanweapons or "SPACE"? lolz.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: AvatarIII on Dec 02, 2014, 03:12:30 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Dec 01, 2014, 11:23:25 PM
So where do you all think a sequel would go after this film?

Obviously it's hard to say because we don't know how this one ends, but the movie is probably following the same structure as the first one. Everything is fine, Hybrid escapes and runs amok as well as the other dinos I'm assuming, people die, and they escape the island after probably killing the hybrid.

assuming they don't decide to bomb the island to get rid of the them once and for all, where do you all think the next installment should or would go, or should this be the last film in the franchise?
the obvious sequel would be Jurassic World: The Lost Park
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Dec 02, 2014, 04:01:57 PM
XD
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 02, 2014, 06:58:47 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Dec 02, 2014, 01:12:51 PM
on "what thing"? dinohumanweapons or "SPACE"? lolz.
Dino Crysis 3. It was kinda intriguing for me.

Quote from: AvatarIII on Dec 02, 2014, 03:12:30 PM
the obvious sequel would be Jurassic World: The Lost Park
Stupendous.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Dec 03, 2014, 02:01:21 PM
If you think the velociraptor squadron in Jurassic World is ridiculous.....

here's UKRAINE'S SQUADRON OF MILITARY DOLPHINS (that were seized by the russians during the anexation of Crimea.) lol
http://www.theguardian.com/world/shortcuts/2014/jul/06/ukraine-combat-dolphins-russia-give-back (http://www.theguardian.com/world/shortcuts/2014/jul/06/ukraine-combat-dolphins-russia-give-back)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 03, 2014, 03:11:39 PM
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/scientist-behind-jurassic-world-breaks-down-trailer-180953505/?no-ist (http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/scientist-behind-jurassic-world-breaks-down-trailer-180953505/?no-ist)

I'm not sure Horner understands how contradictory he sounds in this interview, but I never thought that much of him anyway.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on Dec 03, 2014, 08:54:44 PM
Quote from: Blacklabel on Dec 03, 2014, 02:01:21 PM
If you think the velociraptor squadron in Jurassic World is ridiculous.....

here's UKRAINE'S SQUADRON OF MILITARY DOLPHINS (that were seized by the russians during the anexation of Crimea.) lol
http://www.theguardian.com/world/shortcuts/2014/jul/06/ukraine-combat-dolphins-russia-give-back (http://www.theguardian.com/world/shortcuts/2014/jul/06/ukraine-combat-dolphins-russia-give-back)

Dolphins a Mammals with their neuro-structure and cognitive abilities very close to our brain power, of course you can train and rationalise them.

But not Fish (try usign a Shark instead of a Dolphin), not Reptiles, not Birds and for that matter, no Dinosaurs.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Dec 03, 2014, 09:12:53 PM
Corvids match 'higher' mammals for problem solving intelligence, and parrots and hornbills have highly developed emotional reasoning too. Hell, you can train a pigeon to deliver letters.

Most predatory animals can be trained to at least a degree. When filming Jaws, the Taylors were able to train the great whites to always approach on the sunny side of the boat, for filming purposes. Lemon sharks have been trained to press buttons in order to get food.
Furthermore, even apex predators like tigers and wolves can be imprinted to treat people like family members if they're hand-reared from an early age by a skilled trainer.

Add JP3's conceit that the raptors are "smarter than primates", and JW's trained raptors don't strain my credulity at all. As with a 'tame' lion or wolf, you'd just have to be sure they're kept away from untrained civilians, and as a trainer, you'd have to spend lots of time with them every day to reinforce the 'family' bond, and your position in their hierarchy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master on Dec 03, 2014, 09:31:27 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Dec 03, 2014, 09:12:53 PM
Corvids match 'higher' mammals for problem solving intelligence, and parrots and hornbills have highly developed emotional reasoning too. Hell, you can train a pigeon to deliver letters.

Most predatory animals can be trained to at least a degree. When filming Jaws, the Taylors were able to train the great whites to always approach on the sunny side of the boat, for filming purposes. Lemon sharks have been trained to press buttons in order to get food.
Furthermore, even apex predators like tigers and wolves can be imprinted to treat people like family members if they're hand-reared from an early age by a skilled trainer.

Add JP3's conceit that the raptors are "smarter than primates", and JW's trained raptors don't strain my credulity at all. As with a 'tame' lion or wolf, you'd just have to be sure they're kept away from untrained civilians, and as a trainer, you'd have to spend lots of time with them every day to reinforce the 'family' bond, and your position in their hierarchy.

Actually you can not. Pigeons "deliver" letter from one place to the place of their birth/nesting, not the other way arround.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 03, 2014, 10:09:19 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGyH8KRyC3A#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGyH8KRyC3A#ws)

Watch it all the way to the end, you'll laugh your ass off.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Dec 03, 2014, 10:40:05 PM
Quote from: Master on Dec 03, 2014, 09:31:27 PM
Actually you can not. Pigeons "deliver" letter from one place to the place of their birth/nesting, not the other way arround.

Nerd! :D
But yes, good call.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Dec 04, 2014, 01:08:11 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 03, 2014, 10:09:19 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGyH8KRyC3A#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGyH8KRyC3A#ws)

Watch it all the way to the end, you'll laugh your ass off.
Thats 95Percent reaching right there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 01:09:48 AM
Indeed, but the ending was pretty funny I thought.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on Dec 04, 2014, 09:43:29 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Dec 03, 2014, 09:12:53 PM
Corvids match 'higher' mammals for problem solving intelligence, and parrots and hornbills have highly developed emotional reasoning too. Hell, you can train a pigeon to deliver letters.

Most predatory animals can be trained to at least a degree. When filming Jaws, the Taylors were able to train the great whites to always approach on the sunny side of the boat, for filming purposes. Lemon sharks have been trained to press buttons in order to get food.
Furthermore, even apex predators like tigers and wolves can be imprinted to treat people like family members if they're hand-reared from an early age by a skilled trainer.

Add JP3's conceit that the raptors are "smarter than primates", and JW's trained raptors don't strain my credulity at all. As with a 'tame' lion or wolf, you'd just have to be sure they're kept away from untrained civilians, and as a trainer, you'd have to spend lots of time with them every day to reinforce the 'family' bond, and your position in their hierarchy.

Strictly speaking many of your mentioned examples are not fully true or thought to the end.
Sure, through behavioural studies you can modify a Great White Sharks behaviour to accomodate certain settings. Like the Taylors did. That being said, you can also swim to those Sharks without them eating you, that doesn't mean at all that you've "trained" them, you are simply exploiting their mood at that current situation and surrounding. There are several people who "ride" great whites by holding on to their fin WHEN there's clear water and no aggressing factors like prey around. Only because you can do something with an animal, doesn't mean at all that you trained it like a pet.

As for your parrot example, it has been showed on only very few occasions that they have a brain that allows them to differ between the outlines of different human faces, therefore "recognising" certain humans and their sounds. However those cases are so few, that you simply cannot take it as a rule.

You can train gorillas, Orang-Utans, Chimps, Elephants and Dolphins/Orcas because their adaptive skills are so vastly superior to other animals and because their brain-movements when "thinking" are literally identical to humans.

Even Dogs and Cats were horribly slow learners few 1000 years ago, only through the longevity of their "training" (100s if not 1000s  of years) their genetics made them as docile as whe know them today.

Point being: Training animals is not as easy and "matter-of-fact" as you make it sound at all and only because it has worked in certain instances, doesn't make it a rule at all.

But that's not my problem with the film. If the writers wrote "trained raptors", they simply wrote it and now it's in the movie. The idea itself stays absolutely stupid. Doesn't mean it can't be dumb fun, but since the first jurassic park showed us Raptors as this horrific predators, I simply fail to see how Chris Pratt managed to make them his allies in a few years. I'm sure they'll explain it with some kind of DNA-Science shit which will make it all the more ludicrous.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 01:33:52 PM
http://www.theguardian.com/science/lost-worlds/2014/dec/04/scientists-disappointed-jurassic-world-dinosaurs-movie-film?CMP=share_btn_tw (http://www.theguardian.com/science/lost-worlds/2014/dec/04/scientists-disappointed-jurassic-world-dinosaurs-movie-film?CMP=share_btn_tw)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Dec 04, 2014, 04:52:35 PM
Lol science
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master on Dec 04, 2014, 05:00:07 PM
They do have a point. I`d prefere more modern dinosaurs. Hell they could have implamanted both "classic" JP dinos and up to date ones. Explanation is that they have better cloning technique bla bla bla...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Dec 04, 2014, 05:27:39 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 03, 2014, 03:11:39 PM
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/scientist-behind-jurassic-world-breaks-down-trailer-180953505/?no-ist (http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/scientist-behind-jurassic-world-breaks-down-trailer-180953505/?no-ist)

I'm not sure Horner understands how contradictory he sounds in this interview, but I never thought that much of him anyway.
Here we go again  ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 05:29:36 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Dec 04, 2014, 04:52:35 PM
Lol science

I know, right? Such silliness. Much easier to live in fantasy-land.

Quote from: Master on Dec 04, 2014, 05:00:07 PM
They do have a point. I`d prefere more modern dinosaurs. Hell they could have implamanted both "classic" JP dinos and up to date ones. Explanation is that they have better cloning technique bla bla bla...

Finally; someone who understands.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Dec 04, 2014, 05:43:15 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 05:29:36 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Dec 04, 2014, 04:52:35 PM
Lol science

I know, right? Such silliness. Much easier to live in fantasy-land.

Quote from: Master on Dec 04, 2014, 05:00:07 PM
They do have a point. I`d prefere more modern dinosaurs. Hell they could have implamanted both "classic" JP dinos and up to date ones. Explanation is that they have better cloning technique bla bla bla...

Finally; someone who understands.
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 05:29:36 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Dec 04, 2014, 04:52:35 PM
Lol science

I know, right? Such silliness. Much easier to live in fantasy-land.

Quote from: Master on Dec 04, 2014, 05:00:07 PM
They do have a point. I`d prefere more modern dinosaurs. Hell they could have implamanted both "classic" JP dinos and up to date ones. Explanation is that they have better cloning technique bla bla bla...

Finally; someone who understands.
Dude its a movie ha you might as well complain about the fact that they cant bring dinosaurs back to life.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Dec 04, 2014, 06:00:11 PM
Go watch Birds if you love feathers so much.   ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: coolbreeze on Dec 04, 2014, 06:02:04 PM
People be sucking the fun out of the franchise. Damn..
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Dec 04, 2014, 06:04:32 PM
A giant lizard chasing me is much more frightening then a giant bird that can't even fly.

in like 7 years science will change it's mind and say oh nah nvm maybe they didn't have feathers and then everyone's gonna bitch about a scientifically accurate dinosaur movie with feathered lizards

NOBODY CAN EVER WIN WE WILL NEVER KNOW WHAT THEY RLLY LOOKED LIKE
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Dec 04, 2014, 06:05:43 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Dec 04, 2014, 06:04:32 PM
A giant lizard chasing me is much more frightening then a giant bird that can't even fly.

in like 7 years science will change it's mind and say oh nah nvm maybe they didn't have feathers and then everyone's gonna bitch about a scientifically accurate dinosaur movie with feathered lizards

NOBODY CAN EVER WIN WE WILL NEVER KNOW WHAT THEY RLLY LOOKED LIKE
Totally agree with this. At the end of the day we won't know what they look like.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master on Dec 04, 2014, 06:29:39 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 05:29:36 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Dec 04, 2014, 04:52:35 PM
Lol science

I know, right? Such silliness. Much easier to live in fantasy-land.

Quote from: Master on Dec 04, 2014, 05:00:07 PM
They do have a point. I`d prefere more modern dinosaurs. Hell they could have implamanted both "classic" JP dinos and up to date ones. Explanation is that they have better cloning technique bla bla bla...

Finally; someone who understands.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.maniacworld.com%2Finternet-high-five.jpg&hash=0bc64bb713af067977cbb026b6bb534a96475642)

It`s sad that most of others dosen`t understand that we love those movies like them. But we love paleontology and real dinosaurs too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 06:54:00 PM
Quote from: coolbreeze on Dec 04, 2014, 06:02:04 PM
People be sucking the fun out of the franchise. Damn..

See, it's this mentality that I don't understand. No one has yet explained to me, how and why science-accurate dinosaurs would ruin the film. Do you people actually know that John Hammond, in the original book, wanted real dinosaurs and actively discouraged his scientists from modifying them to be anything but?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Dec 04, 2014, 06:59:22 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 06:54:00 PM
Quote from: coolbreeze on Dec 04, 2014, 06:02:04 PM
People be sucking the fun out of the franchise. Damn..

See, it's this mentality that I don't understand. No one has yet explained to me, how and why science-accurate dinosaurs would ruin the film. Do you people actually know that John Hammond, in the original book, wanted real dinosaurs and actively discouraged his scientists from modifying them to be anything but?

bruh he dead
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Dec 04, 2014, 07:11:28 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 05:29:36 PM
I know, right? Such silliness. Much easier to live in fantasy-land.

My cinema is called Odeon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Dec 04, 2014, 07:57:30 PM
We need the next movie to have a blue whale sized Giganotosaurus like in Dino Crisis 2 that can shoot it's tongue out and survive several burns to the face.

And it would be f**king awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 08:00:01 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Dec 04, 2014, 07:57:30 PM
We need the next movie to have a blue whale sized Giganotosaurus like in Dino Crisis 2 that can shoot it's tongue out and survive several burns to the face.

And it would be f**king awesome.

Actually, I think that thing was smaller than a blue whale :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Dec 04, 2014, 08:04:48 PM
Quote from: coolbreeze on Dec 04, 2014, 06:02:04 PM
People be sucking the fun out of the franchise. Damn..

This.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Dec 04, 2014, 08:38:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 08:00:01 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Dec 04, 2014, 07:57:30 PM
We need the next movie to have a blue whale sized Giganotosaurus like in Dino Crisis 2 that can shoot it's tongue out and survive several burns to the face.

And it would be f**king awesome.

Actually, I think that thing was smaller than a blue whale :P

We must go bigger then.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: coolbreeze on Dec 04, 2014, 09:12:20 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 06:54:00 PM
Quote from: coolbreeze on Dec 04, 2014, 06:02:04 PM
People be sucking the fun out of the franchise. Damn..

See, it's this mentality that I don't understand. No one has yet explained to me, how and why science-accurate dinosaurs would ruin the film. Do you people actually know that John Hammond, in the original book, wanted real dinosaurs and actively discouraged his scientists from modifying them to be anything but?

Never said science accurate dinos would ruin the film..
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DaddyYautja on Dec 04, 2014, 10:34:10 PM
Quote from: Tangakkai on Dec 04, 2014, 09:43:29 AM

But that's not my problem with the film. If the writers wrote "trained raptors", they simply wrote it and now it's in the movie. The idea itself stays absolutely stupid. Doesn't mean it can't be dumb fun, but since the first jurassic park showed us Raptors as this horrific predators, I simply fail to see how Chris Pratt managed to make them his allies in a few years. I'm sure they'll explain it with some kind of DNA-Science shit which will make it all the more ludicrous.

The first film showed them to be smart predators and the people taking care of them didnt want to deal with that, they just wanted them gone.
Pratt instead of just thinking like some hunter that sees the animal as some wild creature probably went with a more scientific approached engaged with the animals and worked with their intelligence.   
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Dec 04, 2014, 10:59:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 06:54:00 PM
Quote from: coolbreeze on Dec 04, 2014, 06:02:04 PM
People be sucking the fun out of the franchise. Damn..

See, it's this mentality that I don't understand. No one has yet explained to me, how and why science-accurate dinosaurs would ruin the film.

They wouldn't, really. It's the constant whining and arguing about it that ruins the fun. It is what it is I don't see the point in arguing it. And it just kills the hype for those who are looking forward to it 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Dec 04, 2014, 11:13:32 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Dec 04, 2014, 10:59:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 06:54:00 PM
Quote from: coolbreeze on Dec 04, 2014, 06:02:04 PM
People be sucking the fun out of the franchise. Damn..

See, it's this mentality that I don't understand. No one has yet explained to me, how and why science-accurate dinosaurs would ruin the film.

They wouldn't, really. It's the constant whining and arguing about it that ruins the fun. It is what it is I don't see the point in arguing it. And it just kills the hype for those who are looking forward to it
Yea the whining is getting out of hand.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 11:58:26 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Dec 04, 2014, 10:59:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 06:54:00 PM
Quote from: coolbreeze on Dec 04, 2014, 06:02:04 PM
People be sucking the fun out of the franchise. Damn..

See, it's this mentality that I don't understand. No one has yet explained to me, how and why science-accurate dinosaurs would ruin the film.

They wouldn't, really. It's the constant whining and arguing about it that ruins the fun. It is what it is I don't see the point in arguing it. And it just kills the hype for those who are looking forward to it
So stay out of the conversation. Simple.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: coolbreeze on Dec 05, 2014, 12:06:15 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 11:58:26 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Dec 04, 2014, 10:59:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 06:54:00 PM
Quote from: coolbreeze on Dec 04, 2014, 06:02:04 PM
People be sucking the fun out of the franchise. Damn..

See, it's this mentality that I don't understand. No one has yet explained to me, how and why science-accurate dinosaurs would ruin the film.

They wouldn't, really. It's the constant whining and arguing about it that ruins the fun. It is what it is I don't see the point in arguing it. And it just kills the hype for those who are looking forward to it
So stay out of the conversation. Simple.

It's not a conversation, it's you crying that the dinosaurs don't have feathers...  ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Dec 05, 2014, 12:24:41 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 11:58:26 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Dec 04, 2014, 10:59:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 06:54:00 PM
Quote from: coolbreeze on Dec 04, 2014, 06:02:04 PM
People be sucking the fun out of the franchise. Damn..

See, it's this mentality that I don't understand. No one has yet explained to me, how and why science-accurate dinosaurs would ruin the film.

They wouldn't, really. It's the constant whining and arguing about it that ruins the fun. It is what it is I don't see the point in arguing it. And it just kills the hype for those who are looking forward to it
So stay out of the conversation. Simple.

How about change the conversation to something more positive xD

It's not just here. Facebook, YouTube, Imgur, Reddit, whatever the hell. I don't join the conversations often, but they're still an eyesore. This is pretty much the only forum I frequent, as it probably is for a good amount of people, so it's kind of hard not to get into the conversation when it just keeps being the focus of the topic over and over again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 05, 2014, 01:34:33 AM
Quote from: coolbreeze on Dec 05, 2014, 12:06:15 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 11:58:26 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Dec 04, 2014, 10:59:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 06:54:00 PM
Quote from: coolbreeze on Dec 04, 2014, 06:02:04 PM
People be sucking the fun out of the franchise. Damn..

See, it's this mentality that I don't understand. No one has yet explained to me, how and why science-accurate dinosaurs would ruin the film.

They wouldn't, really. It's the constant whining and arguing about it that ruins the fun. It is what it is I don't see the point in arguing it. And it just kills the hype for those who are looking forward to it
So stay out of the conversation. Simple.

It's not a conversation, it's you crying that the dinosaurs don't have feathers...  ::)
Who's crying? I'm merely pointing out a flaw with the movie. You're the one getting your knickers all twisted up because you don't like it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: coolbreeze on Dec 05, 2014, 01:43:58 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 05, 2014, 01:34:33 AM
Quote from: coolbreeze on Dec 05, 2014, 12:06:15 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 11:58:26 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Dec 04, 2014, 10:59:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 06:54:00 PM
Quote from: coolbreeze on Dec 04, 2014, 06:02:04 PM
People be sucking the fun out of the franchise. Damn..

See, it's this mentality that I don't understand. No one has yet explained to me, how and why science-accurate dinosaurs would ruin the film.

They wouldn't, really. It's the constant whining and arguing about it that ruins the fun. It is what it is I don't see the point in arguing it. And it just kills the hype for those who are looking forward to it
So stay out of the conversation. Simple.

It's not a conversation, it's you crying that the dinosaurs don't have feathers...  ::)
Who's crying? I'm merely pointing out a flaw with the movie. You're the one getting your knickers all twisted up because you don't like it.

Please show me where I'm getting my knickers twisted up lol. I just pointed out that you're sucking all the fun out of a new Jurassic movie with you're whining. Maybe you should stay out of this conversation.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Dec 05, 2014, 01:52:09 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi2.kym-cdn.com%2Fphotos%2Fimages%2Foriginal%2F000%2F757%2F498%2F89c.gif&hash=da63945dd330c0df91bd6d9b5777e85da2afe9fe)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 05, 2014, 03:39:24 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Dec 05, 2014, 12:24:41 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 11:58:26 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Dec 04, 2014, 10:59:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 06:54:00 PM
Quote from: coolbreeze on Dec 04, 2014, 06:02:04 PM
People be sucking the fun out of the franchise. Damn..

See, it's this mentality that I don't understand. No one has yet explained to me, how and why science-accurate dinosaurs would ruin the film.

They wouldn't, really. It's the constant whining and arguing about it that ruins the fun. It is what it is I don't see the point in arguing it. And it just kills the hype for those who are looking forward to it
So stay out of the conversation. Simple.

How about change the conversation to something more positive xD

It's not just here. Facebook, YouTube, Imgur, Reddit, whatever the hell. I don't join the conversations often, but they're still an eyesore. This is pretty much the only forum I frequent, as it probably is for a good amount of people, so it's kind of hard not to get into the conversation when it just keeps being the focus of the topic over and over again.

Yet more proof that it's not something silly that doesn't mean anything. People actually care. This shouldn't surprise you.

Quote from: coolbreeze on Dec 05, 2014, 01:43:58 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 05, 2014, 01:34:33 AM
Quote from: coolbreeze on Dec 05, 2014, 12:06:15 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 11:58:26 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Dec 04, 2014, 10:59:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 06:54:00 PM
Quote from: coolbreeze on Dec 04, 2014, 06:02:04 PM
People be sucking the fun out of the franchise. Damn..

See, it's this mentality that I don't understand. No one has yet explained to me, how and why science-accurate dinosaurs would ruin the film.

They wouldn't, really. It's the constant whining and arguing about it that ruins the fun. It is what it is I don't see the point in arguing it. And it just kills the hype for those who are looking forward to it
So stay out of the conversation. Simple.

It's not a conversation, it's you crying that the dinosaurs don't have feathers...  ::)
Who's crying? I'm merely pointing out a flaw with the movie. You're the one getting your knickers all twisted up because you don't like it.

Please show me where I'm getting my knickers twisted up lol. I just pointed out that you're sucking all the fun out of a new Jurassic movie with you're whining. Maybe you should stay out of this conversation.

How about no? You're the one who has a problem with someone talking about something you don't like. So again, if this is too much for you to handle, ignore my posts. You do have that option, in case you're wondering.

Quote from: MudButt on Dec 05, 2014, 01:52:09 AM
http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/757/498/89c.gif

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg2.timeinc.net%2Few%2Fi%2F2014%2F05%2F14%2FGodzilla-GIF.gif&hash=29c24e7a1e3c869120404874a66a0851d41ddac7)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Dec 05, 2014, 04:13:14 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvAuJkkacIg#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvAuJkkacIg#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: coolbreeze on Dec 05, 2014, 05:53:04 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 05, 2014, 03:39:24 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Dec 05, 2014, 12:24:41 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 11:58:26 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Dec 04, 2014, 10:59:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 06:54:00 PM
Quote from: coolbreeze on Dec 04, 2014, 06:02:04 PM
People be sucking the fun out of the franchise. Damn..

See, it's this mentality that I don't understand. No one has yet explained to me, how and why science-accurate dinosaurs would ruin the film.

They wouldn't, really. It's the constant whining and arguing about it that ruins the fun. It is what it is I don't see the point in arguing it. And it just kills the hype for those who are looking forward to it
So stay out of the conversation. Simple.

How about change the conversation to something more positive xD

It's not just here. Facebook, YouTube, Imgur, Reddit, whatever the hell. I don't join the conversations often, but they're still an eyesore. This is pretty much the only forum I frequent, as it probably is for a good amount of people, so it's kind of hard not to get into the conversation when it just keeps being the focus of the topic over and over again.

Yet more proof that it's not something silly that doesn't mean anything. People actually care. This shouldn't surprise you.

Quote from: coolbreeze on Dec 05, 2014, 01:43:58 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 05, 2014, 01:34:33 AM
Quote from: coolbreeze on Dec 05, 2014, 12:06:15 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 11:58:26 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Dec 04, 2014, 10:59:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 06:54:00 PM
Quote from: coolbreeze on Dec 04, 2014, 06:02:04 PM
People be sucking the fun out of the franchise. Damn..

See, it's this mentality that I don't understand. No one has yet explained to me, how and why science-accurate dinosaurs would ruin the film.

They wouldn't, really. It's the constant whining and arguing about it that ruins the fun. It is what it is I don't see the point in arguing it. And it just kills the hype for those who are looking forward to it
So stay out of the conversation. Simple.

It's not a conversation, it's you crying that the dinosaurs don't have feathers...  ::)
Who's crying? I'm merely pointing out a flaw with the movie. You're the one getting your knickers all twisted up because you don't like it.

Please show me where I'm getting my knickers twisted up lol. I just pointed out that you're sucking all the fun out of a new Jurassic movie with you're whining. Maybe you should stay out of this conversation.

How about no? You're the one who has a problem with someone talking about something you don't like. So again, if this is too much for you to handle, ignore my posts. You do have that option, in case you're wondering.

Quote from: MudButt on Dec 05, 2014, 01:52:09 AM
http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/757/498/89c.gif

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg2.timeinc.net%2Few%2Fi%2F2014%2F05%2F14%2FGodzilla-GIF.gif&hash=29c24e7a1e3c869120404874a66a0851d41ddac7)

Typical response from you. Talk about what you want, just stop driveling on and on about the same thing over and over. We get it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Dec 05, 2014, 06:35:55 AM
I must admit that at first I was really meh on this movie andI think I voted meh or something... however after the trailer I am pretty hyped now. It's a summer movie, therefor I'm totally expecting awesome dino on dino action. Hopefully with explosions and lasers. I for one welcome a hybrid; plus would love to see a raptor flying an F22 raptor armed with thermal nuclear weapons to kill some dino-human-snake-cuttlefish-deacon PG-13 creature. I mean what the f**k, lets have fun. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 05, 2014, 12:16:42 PM
Y'all might find this interesting.

http://www.gamesradar.com/history-dinosaurs-movies/ (http://www.gamesradar.com/history-dinosaurs-movies/)

QuoteAs we gear up to see what Colin Trevorrow and Chris Pratt can do with our fond memories of the 1993 behemoth, let's head back in time to see how Dinosaurs have fared in the movies down the years. Obviously, a list of every film to ever feature a dinosaur would take up hundreds of slides, so we've whittled it down to the most important from down the years.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Dec 05, 2014, 03:04:26 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 05, 2014, 03:39:24 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Dec 05, 2014, 12:24:41 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 11:58:26 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Dec 04, 2014, 10:59:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 04, 2014, 06:54:00 PM
Quote from: coolbreeze on Dec 04, 2014, 06:02:04 PM
People be sucking the fun out of the franchise. Damn..

See, it's this mentality that I don't understand. No one has yet explained to me, how and why science-accurate dinosaurs would ruin the film.

They wouldn't, really. It's the constant whining and arguing about it that ruins the fun. It is what it is I don't see the point in arguing it. And it just kills the hype for those who are looking forward to it
So stay out of the conversation. Simple.

How about change the conversation to something more positive xD

It's not just here. Facebook, YouTube, Imgur, Reddit, whatever the hell. I don't join the conversations often, but they're still an eyesore. This is pretty much the only forum I frequent, as it probably is for a good amount of people, so it's kind of hard not to get into the conversation when it just keeps being the focus of the topic over and over again.

Yet more proof that it's not something silly that doesn't mean anything. People actually care. This shouldn't surprise you.

Yes people care, but a lot of people accept it for what it is as well. What I meant was that the SAME people keep dwelling on it and bringing it up over and over again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 05, 2014, 03:21:34 PM
A letter from Thomas Holtz Jr., paleontologist at the University of Maryland, on The Lost World. Amazingly, of the three movies so far, it featured the most accurate dinosaurs!

http://dml.cmnh.org/1997May/msg00762.html (http://dml.cmnh.org/1997May/msg00762.html)

And speaking of The Lost World, ever wondered what the original promo site from 1997 was like? Here's your chance to check it out.

http://www.lost-world.com/Site_B/siteb_map.html (http://www.lost-world.com/Site_B/siteb_map.html)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Dec 07, 2014, 01:18:50 PM
I really like this fan made trailer, the moment you see the amber with the insect in it you know it's Jp and has a better vibe overall...the people who made the official trailer better step up for the next one (ditch the piano music or put it at a suitable place)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmrR92FNuvk (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmrR92FNuvk)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Dec 08, 2014, 11:16:32 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EBDFXpsHd8E (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EBDFXpsHd8E)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Dec 08, 2014, 11:44:54 AM
Isn't that the same as the last one you posted?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Dec 08, 2014, 12:12:24 PM
Haha, forgot I had posted it here already. ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 08, 2014, 03:02:31 PM
New trailer out soon!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 08, 2014, 07:41:08 PM
http://moviepilot.com/posts/2475543?lt_source=external,manual,manual (http://moviepilot.com/posts/2475543?lt_source=external,manual,manual)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Dec 08, 2014, 11:54:16 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 08, 2014, 03:02:31 PM
New trailer out soon!

where did ya read this?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Dec 09, 2014, 01:39:51 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 08, 2014, 07:41:08 PM
http://moviepilot.com/posts/2475543?lt_source=external,manual,manual (http://moviepilot.com/posts/2475543?lt_source=external,manual,manual)

;-;
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 09, 2014, 02:29:16 AM
Quote from: MudButt on Dec 08, 2014, 11:54:16 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 08, 2014, 03:02:31 PM
New trailer out soon!

where did ya read this?

(https://scontent-b-ord.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/1456134_10152446005086615_2345339987322063662_n.jpg?oh=b3e32aa96bf67ce5ce2b15a7d9406e85&oe=54FCF708)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Dec 09, 2014, 02:50:11 AM
Ah so the scenes from the other leaked stuff.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Dec 09, 2014, 03:10:09 AM
Spoiler
RAMPAGING D-REX AND PTERANODON ATTACK!!!! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 09, 2014, 12:33:20 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Dec 09, 2014, 02:50:11 AM
Ah so the scenes from the other leaked stuff.

Guess they figure it might as well make it official.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Dec 09, 2014, 04:25:31 PM
just found this fan art  ;D

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1371.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fag299%2Fenchiridion86%2Fzo6c9ipiraa5xlwyphtr_zpsd1059555.jpg&hash=5bd07e14b1301266b26206b37614c77d47187a4f)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 09, 2014, 06:08:56 PM
But do they dance?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Dec 09, 2014, 08:01:34 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 09, 2014, 06:08:56 PM
But do they dance?

Ooh, child...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Dec 09, 2014, 11:21:54 PM
Quote from: Crazy Shrimp on Dec 09, 2014, 04:25:31 PM
just found this fan art  ;D

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1371.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fag299%2Fenchiridion86%2Fzo6c9ipiraa5xlwyphtr_zpsd1059555.jpg&hash=5bd07e14b1301266b26206b37614c77d47187a4f)

Haha awesome
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Dec 10, 2014, 12:58:24 PM
I'm incredibly interested by the
Spoiler
fan theory that it is the original T.Rex from the first Jurassic Park. It perfectly lines up with the theory of paleontologists that T.Rex didn't reach full size until it was 20 years old and lived to be about 30. I can imagine the T.Rex coming in at the end and killing the D.Rex at that climactic moment. That would honestly probably bring tears to my eyes.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: bobby brown on Dec 10, 2014, 02:18:23 PM
What if the D-Rex turns out to be the spinosaurus again? and its part of an elaborate marketing ruse, and it proceeds to rape the rex again?

That'll Be dope.


Spoiler
I'm sorry I can't help myself when I read stuff like that.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Dec 10, 2014, 03:52:21 PM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Dec 10, 2014, 12:58:24 PM
I'm incredibly interested by the
Spoiler
fan theory that it is the original T.Rex from the first Jurassic Park.
[close]
It's no theory, it has been oficially confirmed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Dec 10, 2014, 09:48:19 PM
You know what I think the hybrid dinosaur is. It's a T-Rex with some goddamn usable arms. You know the kind that can grab onto people and eat them like we eat chicken legs. Instead of those useless sticks it has now. :P

The cuttlefish dna makes sense but what is the reason for the snake dna? Actually they never said what kind of snake it was. Must have something to do with venom I'm guessing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Dec 11, 2014, 12:57:42 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Dec 10, 2014, 09:48:19 PM
You know what I think the hybrid dinosaur is. It's a T-Rex with some goddamn usable arms. You know the kind that can grab onto people and eat them like we eat chicken legs. Instead of those useless sticks it has now. :P

The cuttlefish dna makes sense but what is the reason for the snake dna? Actually they never said what kind of snake it was. Must have something to do with venom I'm guessing.

It probably won't be nearly as big as T.Rex considering the raptor DNA.
Spoiler
I'd love to see the D.Rex about to kill our heroes then have T.Rex come in and kill it, mirroring the scene from the original movie.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomorphine on Dec 11, 2014, 02:58:58 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Dec 10, 2014, 09:48:19 PM
You know what I think the hybrid dinosaur is. It's a T-Rex with some goddamn usable arms. You know the kind that can grab onto people and eat them like we eat chicken legs. Instead of those useless sticks it has now. :P

The cuttlefish dna makes sense but what is the reason for the snake dna? Actually they never said what kind of snake it was. Must have something to do with venom I'm guessing.

Some snakes have heat-sensitive pits under their eyes, allowing them to hunt their prey by heat emmission.

Not sure if they're attached to the optic nerves. If not, then they wouldn't see in super-imposed thermal vision; just more easily feel from which direction the heat's coming from.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: coolbreeze on Dec 11, 2014, 03:44:57 AM
Quote from: Xenomorphine on Dec 11, 2014, 02:58:58 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Dec 10, 2014, 09:48:19 PM
You know what I think the hybrid dinosaur is. It's a T-Rex with some goddamn usable arms. You know the kind that can grab onto people and eat them like we eat chicken legs. Instead of those useless sticks it has now. :P

The cuttlefish dna makes sense but what is the reason for the snake dna? Actually they never said what kind of snake it was. Must have something to do with venom I'm guessing.

Some snakes have heat-sensitive pits under their eyes, allowing them to hunt their prey by heat emmission.

Not sure if they're attached to the optic nerves. If not, then they wouldn't see in super-imposed thermal vision; just more easily feel from which direction the heat's coming from.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYxiffT7izY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYxiffT7izY#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Dec 11, 2014, 05:53:29 AM
Ah. Suddenly the snake DNA makes sense. :) Also just read that they seemed to have change the human dna to raptor dna for the D-rex... that's cool I suppose.

Quote from: Dovahkiin on Dec 11, 2014, 12:57:42 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Dec 10, 2014, 09:48:19 PM
You know what I think the hybrid dinosaur is. It's a T-Rex with some goddamn usable arms. You know the kind that can grab onto people and eat them like we eat chicken legs. Instead of those useless sticks it has now. :P

The cuttlefish dna makes sense but what is the reason for the snake dna? Actually they never said what kind of snake it was. Must have something to do with venom I'm guessing.

It probably won't be nearly as big as T.Rex considering the raptor DNA.
Spoiler
I'd love to see the D.Rex about to kill our heroes then have T.Rex come in and kill it, mirroring the scene from the original movie.
[close]
Spoiler
Be cooler if it was also the same T-Rex from the original movie. :P
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: AvatarIII on Dec 11, 2014, 04:11:28 PM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Dec 11, 2014, 12:57:42 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Dec 10, 2014, 09:48:19 PM
You know what I think the hybrid dinosaur is. It's a T-Rex with some goddamn usable arms. You know the kind that can grab onto people and eat them like we eat chicken legs. Instead of those useless sticks it has now. :P

The cuttlefish dna makes sense but what is the reason for the snake dna? Actually they never said what kind of snake it was. Must have something to do with venom I'm guessing.

It probably won't be nearly as big as T.Rex considering the raptor DNA.
Spoiler
I'd love to see the D.Rex about to kill our heroes then have T.Rex come in and kill it, mirroring the scene from the original movie.
[close]

That's not really how genetic engineering works though, if they have good technology they could get the intelligence part of the Raptor DNA without the size part.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Dec 11, 2014, 10:09:56 PM
Quote from: AvatarIII on Dec 11, 2014, 04:11:28 PM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Dec 11, 2014, 12:57:42 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Dec 10, 2014, 09:48:19 PM
You know what I think the hybrid dinosaur is. It's a T-Rex with some goddamn usable arms. You know the kind that can grab onto people and eat them like we eat chicken legs. Instead of those useless sticks it has now. :P

The cuttlefish dna makes sense but what is the reason for the snake dna? Actually they never said what kind of snake it was. Must have something to do with venom I'm guessing.

It probably won't be nearly as big as T.Rex considering the raptor DNA.
Spoiler
I'd love to see the D.Rex about to kill our heroes then have T.Rex come in and kill it, mirroring the scene from the original movie.
[close]

That's not really how genetic engineering works though, if they have good technology they could get the intelligence part of the Raptor DNA without the size part.
It's only been 10 years man. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vecrotus on Dec 11, 2014, 11:45:58 PM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Dec 11, 2014, 12:57:42 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Dec 10, 2014, 09:48:19 PM
You know what I think the hybrid dinosaur is. It's a T-Rex with some goddamn usable arms. You know the kind that can grab onto people and eat them like we eat chicken legs. Instead of those useless sticks it has now. :P

The cuttlefish dna makes sense but what is the reason for the snake dna? Actually they never said what kind of snake it was. Must have something to do with venom I'm guessing.

It probably won't be nearly as big as T.Rex considering the raptor DNA.
Spoiler
I'd love to see the D.Rex about to kill our heroes then have T.Rex come in and kill it, mirroring the scene from the original movie.
[close]

Spoiler
I think it might be bigger. Leaked footage had Henry Wu saying it was designed to be bigger than T-Rex.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Dec 12, 2014, 12:06:27 AM
"The focus groups want something bigger than a T-Rex. And that's what they get." Colin Trevorrow
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Dec 12, 2014, 12:12:46 AM
Quote from: Taxemic on Dec 12, 2014, 12:06:27 AM
"The focus groups want something bigger than a T-Rex. And that's what they get." Colin Trevorrow
They got the Spinosaurus in Jurassic Park 3. What more do people want. :P

I'm assuming the one in the trailer is a baby or that they cooked up other dinos yet unseen. Which would be awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Sozin on Dec 13, 2014, 06:35:26 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FR00L3UM.jpg&hash=9a141f10adfab230609329d17627d1442e14c1e2)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FD3BiGGJ.jpg&hash=9eed41cbcc6d0148eeca927f9f6903429e6ddb04)

I'm getting a Ripley/Shaw vibe from that pic. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Dec 13, 2014, 07:38:20 PM
Spoiler
Bryce holding a flare...Perhaps to lure something...I sense an epic climactic battle between T.Rex and D.Rex.  8)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Dec 13, 2014, 07:40:32 PM
Oh, there's a flare? I was focused on... other things. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Dec 13, 2014, 07:42:31 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi3.kym-cdn.com%2Fphotos%2Fimages%2Fnewsfeed%2F000%2F312%2F563%2F05d.jpg&hash=3fb8d416d0b0e97a3c3d28c313a32119cabbcc14)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Dec 17, 2014, 09:59:05 PM
Hey guys...(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B5FqqUkCEAA7nya.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 17, 2014, 10:01:03 PM
Now dance.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Sozin on Dec 17, 2014, 10:02:48 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 17, 2014, 10:01:03 PM
Now dance.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.herpy.net%2Fgallery%2Fdata%2Fmedia%2F6%2Fraptor_poledance.gif&hash=ff54016da36a710de65ba0ddbe021df2fa6991df)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Dec 17, 2014, 10:08:28 PM
Quote from: Sozin on Dec 13, 2014, 06:35:26 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FR00L3UM.jpg&hash=9a141f10adfab230609329d17627d1442e14c1e2)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FD3BiGGJ.jpg&hash=9eed41cbcc6d0148eeca927f9f6903429e6ddb04)

I'm getting a Ripley/Shaw vibe from that pic. 8)

Quote from: KiramidHead on Dec 13, 2014, 07:40:32 PM
Oh, there's a flare? I was focused on... other things. :laugh:
Good god, I didn't notice the flare either.

All this rumor talk about JP4 is worrying because it's really starting to sound like JP1 all over again. I hope there is more to the story than another T-rex saves the day or is conquered by some man made dino ruse.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 17, 2014, 10:11:10 PM
Quote from: Sozin on Dec 17, 2014, 10:02:48 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 17, 2014, 10:01:03 PM
Now dance.
http://www.herpy.net/gallery/data/media/6/raptor_poledance.gif

Things are gonna get easier, Raptor, Some day, when the world is much brighter.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Dec 17, 2014, 10:12:57 PM
Quote from: Godzillakuj94 on Dec 17, 2014, 09:59:05 PM
Hey guys...https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B5FqqUkCEAA7nya.jpg
I want a Chris Pratt action figure.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Sozin on Dec 17, 2014, 10:14:22 PM
Sure you don't mean a real doll? ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Dec 17, 2014, 11:34:33 PM
Quote from: Sozin on Dec 17, 2014, 10:02:48 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 17, 2014, 10:01:03 PM
Now dance.
http://www.herpy.net/gallery/data/media/6/raptor_poledance.gif
Every time I underestimate the internet...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Wrecktangle on Dec 17, 2014, 11:44:49 PM
Quote from: Godzillakuj94 on Dec 17, 2014, 09:59:05 PM
Hey guys...https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B5FqqUkCEAA7nya.jpg

Great actor, but I find it hard to take Andy Dwyer/Star Lord/Emmett seriously   :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Dec 18, 2014, 12:26:49 AM
Quote from: Godzillakuj94 on Dec 17, 2014, 09:59:05 PM
Hey guys...https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B5FqqUkCEAA7nya.jpg

Raptor Lord
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Dec 18, 2014, 12:45:44 AM
Quote from: Godzillakuj94 on Dec 17, 2014, 09:59:05 PM
Hey guys...https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B5FqqUkCEAA7nya.jpg

Where were you when Chris Pratt reached insurmountable levels of being based?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Dec 18, 2014, 12:54:09 AM
Trevorrow (wonder if I spelled that right) described the relationship between Owen and the raptors as something similar to how zoologists behave around lions. It's interesting considering the raptors' intelligence.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 18, 2014, 12:45:27 PM
Quote from: Crazy Shrimp on Dec 18, 2014, 12:26:49 AM
Quote from: Godzillakuj94 on Dec 17, 2014, 09:59:05 PM
Hey guys...https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B5FqqUkCEAA7nya.jpg

Raptor Lord

I swear that raptor looks bigger than the previous ones.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Blacklabel on Dec 18, 2014, 05:53:16 PM
The park has been running well for years and years in this film. Maybe it's a really old raptor :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Dec 18, 2014, 06:09:19 PM
Saw this trailer for the first time on the big screen before seeing the Hobbit, it was beautiful.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Dec 18, 2014, 09:02:21 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 18, 2014, 12:45:27 PM
Quote from: Crazy Shrimp on Dec 18, 2014, 12:26:49 AM
Quote from: Godzillakuj94 on Dec 17, 2014, 09:59:05 PM
Hey guys...https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B5FqqUkCEAA7nya.jpg

Raptor Lord

I swear that raptor looks bigger than the previous ones.
It's because it's to scale.

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 18, 2014, 11:39:02 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Dec 18, 2014, 06:09:19 PM
Saw this trailer for the first time on the big screen before seeing the Hobbit, it was beautiful.

ARG!!! I didn't see one >:( >:( >:(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Dec 19, 2014, 12:20:37 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg2.timeinc.net%2Few%2Fi%2F2014%2F12%2F13%2FJurassic-World_990x494.jpg&hash=96564da40c81b9edef7def6712ed2a44eddc5d11)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Dec 19, 2014, 12:55:48 AM
Awww, cute. I hope they get strokies.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Sozin on Dec 20, 2014, 09:50:41 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbitcast-a-sm.bitgravity.com%2Fslashfilm%2Fwp%2Fwp-content%2Fimages%2Ftumblr_ng6rs6pEZw1sk3ry1o1_500.gif&hash=f8637fa0aeda7a7e6a824a181ed3b7ca062cc12e)



(https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7465/16065273422_80e2644e98.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Dec 20, 2014, 11:18:30 PM
Quote from: Sozin on Dec 20, 2014, 09:50:41 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbitcast-a-sm.bitgravity.com%2Fslashfilm%2Fwp%2Fwp-content%2Fimages%2Ftumblr_ng6rs6pEZw1sk3ry1o1_500.gif&hash=f8637fa0aeda7a7e6a824a181ed3b7ca062cc12e)



(https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7465/16065273422_80e2644e98.jpg)
:o :o :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Dec 30, 2014, 03:16:08 AM
Site Updated!
http://www.jurassicworld.com (http://www.jurassicworld.com)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jurassicworld.com%2Fmedia%2Fdinosaurs%2Fmosasaurus%2Fmosasaurus-info-graphic.png&hash=24e66d564b5293d66d1c6e3c28ed479b561f78ec)(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jurassicworld.com%2Fmedia%2Fdinosaurs%2Fankylosaurus%2Fankylosaurus-info-graphic.png&hash=211d89c45d0324d0d807be24e08f56e4c39e98da)(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jurassicworld.com%2Fmedia%2Fdinosaurs%2Fgallimimus%2Fgallimimus-info-graphic.png&hash=3898957731d22252b832fb7b6812d52f29fa3a5f)(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jurassicworld.com%2Fmedia%2Fdinosaurs%2Fstegosaurus%2Fstegosaurus-info-graphic.png&hash=c0c5803078100ec52304e0758ed1173585c0f4f3)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Dec 30, 2014, 09:05:25 AM
and...

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B6ENJxPIUAADi_E.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Dec 30, 2014, 11:57:35 AM
This is, what, the third Lego Chris Pratt?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Wrecktangle on Dec 30, 2014, 12:23:42 PM
$100 the Tyrannosaurus will kill the stupid "D-Rex" and save the day.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Dec 30, 2014, 05:19:45 PM
Quote from: Wrecktangle on Dec 30, 2014, 12:23:42 PM
$100 the Tyrannosaurus will kill the stupid "D-Rex" and save the day.

That will probably happen, judging by how Bryce Dallace Howard is seen holding a flare as some huge paddock opens up.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.flickeringmyth.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F12%2FJurassic-World-2-600x337.jpg&hash=3127220a3f24d4576ad27c3d17b2f46165626dc9)

You may remember...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.screenrant.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FJurassic-Park-T-Rex-Flare.jpg&hash=88690ae4de2cfb2e3cbd7f9a3f6b050c10d1c270)

As far as I'm concerned, that would be the perfect final battle.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 30, 2014, 06:00:05 PM
Who wouldn't follow those shoulders...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Dec 30, 2014, 08:30:24 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Dec 30, 2014, 06:00:05 PM
Who wouldn't follow those shoulders...

My sentiments exactly.

Spoiler
but for a brief moment I thought you were talking about Grant... :laugh:
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Sozin on Dec 30, 2014, 08:33:01 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Dec 30, 2014, 06:00:05 PM
Who wouldn't follow those shoulders...

Now I can't stop looking at them. :-*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 30, 2014, 08:39:46 PM
We're all T-Rexes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Sozin on Dec 30, 2014, 08:44:38 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 30, 2014, 08:39:46 PM
We're all T-Rexes.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FKvKHNQb.png&hash=83aa1c9828f8d07a223b6d5bec541f9274d67d68)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Dec 31, 2014, 01:40:18 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fclassic-horror.com%2Ffiles%2Fimages%2Fpredator28.jpg&hash=eb1929d3b0fba5609b4b4b584d6bd6867e6125d3)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bender1988 on Dec 31, 2014, 07:14:37 AM
Quote from: Sozin on Dec 30, 2014, 08:44:38 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Dec 30, 2014, 08:39:46 PM
We're all T-Rexes.
http://i.imgur.com/KvKHNQb.png
Quote from: Alien³ on Dec 31, 2014, 01:40:18 AM
http://classic-horror.com/files/images/predator28.jpg
this made my day
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Dec 31, 2014, 10:05:02 AM
Veterinarians are needed at Jurassic World.

http://www.masraniglobal.com/careers/index.html (http://www.masraniglobal.com/careers/index.html)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Dec 31, 2014, 04:41:15 PM
(https://scontent-a-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xap1/t31.0-8/10873358_726591810781122_4143780050859621392_o.jpg)

This size chart is so horribly, embarrassingly wrong, I can't even digest it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 31, 2014, 04:42:37 PM
Aaaaand that's why you don't go with official stats, people.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Jan 01, 2015, 12:18:04 AM
Fruit snacks showing the Rex and Raptors!
Spoiler
(https://scontent-a-ord.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/10888610_859761090735070_6692667547066744727_n.jpg?oh=e245133e523e5d841dddd82a2f55962c&oe=552EB4D1)
[close]
Spoiler
(https://scontent-b-ord.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xap1/v/t1.0-9/10906304_859761050735074_1352815094966337444_n.jpg?oh=90d4ba620b03fe9f95b2175c378f3c6c&oe=5537D175)
[close]
Spoiler
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xfa1/v/t1.0-9/10888410_859761074068405_8697086046063977296_n.jpg?oh=f49f631ee6706dd366f722a93b3167da&oe=552F26D2&__gda__=1430083556_87ca99dc492fc36481aba83df8abe5e9)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jan 03, 2015, 12:42:00 AM
ABC News reveal that Jurassic World is the first movie to be confirmed as signing up for a TV spot during this year's Super Bowl. The event takes place on February 1st, and each will obviously be released online shortly after airing on TV.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=113044 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=113044)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Jan 03, 2015, 04:30:25 AM
alright time to show off more of the mosasaur treverrow
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 03, 2015, 02:23:19 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 31, 2014, 04:41:15 PM
(https://scontent-a-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xap1/t31.0-8/10873358_726591810781122_4143780050859621392_o.jpg)

This size chart is so horribly, embarrassingly wrong, I can't even digest it.

>suchomimus
>baryonyx
>metriacanthosaurus

Really hope those have some screen time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 03, 2015, 02:30:51 PM
Suchomimus must have at least a scene.

Otherwise Universal dies. All of it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jan 08, 2015, 03:44:40 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyuGyq22Ris#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyuGyq22Ris#ws)


http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/KingPatel/news/?a=113311 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/KingPatel/news/?a=113311)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jan 09, 2015, 12:44:49 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMZt0YMw9O0#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMZt0YMw9O0#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jan 09, 2015, 01:26:43 PM
I voted not bothered because while I am interested, I'm also not convinced it'll be any good. They have a lot of making up to do after the dismal third film, and some of the concepts being thrown around during development worry me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jan 09, 2015, 03:31:36 PM
(https://scontent-b-mia.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/t31.0-8/10887320_1014408165246861_1791589855517900287_o.png?efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 09, 2015, 06:34:22 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F41.media.tumblr.com%2F44f7e946e7813ef64949c9b19dc5091c%2Ftumblr_nhs6apPCrJ1rsiohpo1_500.png&hash=2cac0fa6dbccff4cb3da5350d21fba001aba401d)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Sozin on Jan 09, 2015, 06:40:10 PM
Dude, that was just posted. :P :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 09, 2015, 07:19:09 PM
In case you haven't noticed, I don't frequent the thread :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 09, 2015, 08:34:12 PM
Who does frequent it these days? ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Jan 10, 2015, 03:17:47 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Dec 01, 2014, 12:49:56 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Dec 01, 2014, 12:17:46 AMChris Pratt taking requests on this, the day of his daughter's wedding.
Was that a Family Guy reference?
...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jan 10, 2015, 04:20:49 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 09, 2015, 07:19:09 PM
In case you haven't noticed, I don't frequent the thread :P

How could you possibly miss it when you posted right beside it?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Jan 10, 2015, 04:48:38 PM
I was thinking that too, but I guess he could click the Reply button on the top of the thread rather than scrolling all the way down to the Reply button on the bottom of the thread.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 10, 2015, 05:55:07 PM
Quote from: MrSpaceJockey on Jan 10, 2015, 04:48:38 PM
I was thinking that too, but I guess he could click the Reply button on the top of the thread rather than scrolling all the way down to the Reply button on the bottom of the thread.

This.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightlord on Jan 15, 2015, 12:01:50 AM
http://www.flickeringmyth.com/2015/01/leaked-images-unveil-jurassic-worlds-indominus-rex.html (http://www.flickeringmyth.com/2015/01/leaked-images-unveil-jurassic-worlds-indominus-rex.html)

Spoiler obviously.

Honestly think it looks pretty good, thankfully they didn't go too bonkers with it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 15, 2015, 12:13:17 AM
I'm glad they didn't go balls-out nuts with the design. Not sold on the change of name, though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jan 15, 2015, 09:00:43 AM
Serious question - why the hell are they genetically engineering dinosaurs? What could they possibly have to gain from making new breeds with scary knobbly scales?

Please don't say bio-weapon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jan 15, 2015, 09:32:44 AM
Hmmm.... in the Deep Blue Sea they grew giant Mako sharks via genetic engineering so they could harness ample amounts of brain serum to cure Alzheimers. However I'm pretty sure the only reason to genetically f**k with dinos in Jurassic Park was because ticket sales were down and dinos eat so damn much that the food bill was horrendous. So only one choice, make bigger and more deadly dinos to draw in the crowds. That has to be why the Mosasaurs seen is so damn big.

I really shouldn't click that link but I probably will.... hmm that dino seems remarkably boring.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on Jan 15, 2015, 01:21:02 PM
The reason why the mosasaurus is so big, is because it looks more impressive on screen  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Jan 15, 2015, 05:39:28 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Jan 15, 2015, 09:00:43 AM
Serious question - why the hell are they genetically engineering dinosaurs? What could they possibly have to gain from making new breeds with scary knobbly scales?

Please don't say bio-weapon.

Park attendence is down.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Jan 15, 2015, 10:34:43 PM
Things mouth still reminds me of the Deacon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jan 16, 2015, 02:23:18 AM
a few more designs

http://bloody-disgusting.com/news/3328231/jurassic-world-dinosaurs-revealed/ (http://bloody-disgusting.com/news/3328231/jurassic-world-dinosaurs-revealed/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jan 16, 2015, 08:32:27 AM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Jan 15, 2015, 05:39:28 PMPark attendence is down.

If traditional zoos don't really suffer from this, I find it hard to believe a park with FREAKING DINOSAURS would suffer from falling attendance...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jan 16, 2015, 09:20:24 AM
Cause we can!!!!!!

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.bloody-disgusting.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F01%2Fjurassic-world-toys2.jpg&hash=3090e6d7f1c2b00acf695c3e6298e2de217b2642)
That thing looks stupid.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 16, 2015, 09:24:49 AM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Jan 16, 2015, 08:32:27 AM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Jan 15, 2015, 05:39:28 PMPark attendence is down.

If traditional zoos don't really suffer from this, I find it hard to believe a park with FREAKING DINOSAURS would suffer from falling attendance...

We live in a world where a video game that sold millions of copies can be considered a failure because it sold less than the company expected it to. Logic isn't always a factor in corporate decisions. It could easily be a matter of ticket sales not meeting overly high expectations.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jan 16, 2015, 09:32:50 AM
Alright to be serious, I fail to see how the park could not be rolling in dough. I mean after all they are genetically manipulating dino dna. So the money has to be pouring in but what are the possible reasons to do so.

Bio weapon and 'cause we could are the most logical but I regress.  :laugh:

Well the rumor is that the new dino has Trex, Cuttlefish, Boa and raptor dna... well what the f**k else could it be for BUT a weapon?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jan 16, 2015, 09:43:52 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jan 16, 2015, 09:32:50 AMWell the rumor is that the new dino has Trex, Cuttlefish, Boa and raptor dna... well what the f**k else could it be for BUT a weapon?

Oh dear.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 16, 2015, 09:53:03 AM
The cuttlefish DNA is probably a way of giving it the chameleon-esque abilities that Carnotauruses had in the second book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jan 16, 2015, 10:09:29 AM
And the BOA dna could contribute Thermal Vision.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 16, 2015, 03:16:03 PM
Or stretching jaws.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jan 17, 2015, 06:14:11 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jan 16, 2015, 03:16:03 PM
Or stretching jaws.
If they wanted to do that they could have just bought the rights to the Deacon. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jan 17, 2015, 06:02:21 PM
Ladies and gentlemen ... the entire plot of the Jurassic Park series and it's overall message.

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F40.media.tumblr.com%2F424310b7d14a9c1596a5cbd545ff7a4f%2Ftumblr_nfmgzibdyd1s36jhoo1_1280.png&hash=293d11bc32b4bd6ec4bad0773b7f93895bb48140)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F40.media.tumblr.com%2Fc26608071bf880707442e1cadef5a3f2%2Ftumblr_nfmgzibdyd1s36jhoo2_1280.png&hash=4016d8054428a3437f81392a6ac5e4a5c2c48368)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F40.media.tumblr.com%2Faf89d2875d79f7ad38c2ae15394e2972%2Ftumblr_nfmgzibdyd1s36jhoo3_1280.png&hash=26aa9dd3d1b0f9ca1af5879d6e7d951e490c8843)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F41.media.tumblr.com%2Fc82fee1ab66d38a863f39a3cf9d46e1d%2Ftumblr_nfmgzibdyd1s36jhoo4_1280.png&hash=cdb94f1652c59f169fbae2b79fe070a4f3d02f9b)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F41.media.tumblr.com%2F215dbf2052b7a73142698e9d1e7b5d3f%2Ftumblr_nfmgzibdyd1s36jhoo5_1280.png&hash=9497c388d59a246b53dd46f63a6919bd5fe158f5)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F36.media.tumblr.com%2Fdd365f1c6d19508d06ae2f0d36f8d26b%2Ftumblr_nfmgzibdyd1s36jhoo6_1280.png&hash=26af4d4f1a14cd60424df7376f9d9838ebc1b1c6)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F41.media.tumblr.com%2F3e7c00675d592a0711aab4aafb0382e2%2Ftumblr_nfmgzibdyd1s36jhoo7_1280.png&hash=6138debbd26cc68004d225ad323f6866cccc2971)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F41.media.tumblr.com%2F5e76ae29bf4fff05764be42cad9d9a7b%2Ftumblr_nfmgzibdyd1s36jhoo8_1280.png&hash=1318071f4d21a41ff08f2f50740bb3717f4ff6e0)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F40.media.tumblr.com%2F35c337683182fab5ce5e1503a68a432d%2Ftumblr_nfmgzibdyd1s36jhoo9_1280.png&hash=cc60f0fe121b530842a78763d475e31d914bed88)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F36.media.tumblr.com%2F3797b234aba243d578b229c6830e6e29%2Ftumblr_nfmgzibdyd1s36jhoo10_400.jpg&hash=56137a36f716a1351e6a8395d98db6888b0cf3a1)
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 17, 2015, 06:31:35 PM
 :D :D :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DarthJoker45 on Jan 18, 2015, 04:22:08 AM
The folks over at jurassicworldnews.com (http://www.jurassicworldnews.com/community/forums/topic/39532) of Scified.com have been sent an exclusive pic of the I-Rex toy. It teases a major scene in the film.

Spoiler


(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FjHjvtp2.png&hash=e9a547246cca281a5a43242d9ed426ed02746695)

[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Wrecktangle on Jan 18, 2015, 06:47:35 AM
Quote from: DarthJoker45 on Jan 18, 2015, 04:22:08 AM
The folks over at jurassicworldnews.com (http://www.jurassicworldnews.com/community/forums/topic/39532) of Scified.com have been sent an exclusive pic of the I-Rex toy. It teases a major scene in the film.

Spoiler


(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FjHjvtp2.png&hash=e9a547246cca281a5a43242d9ed426ed02746695)

[close]

If they pull another JP3, I'm not going to be happy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jan 18, 2015, 10:13:05 AM
Oh God. Dino deathmatch.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jan 18, 2015, 10:59:24 AM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Jan 18, 2015, 10:13:05 AM
Oh God. Dino deathmatch.
It's Rocky 4 all over again!!!!!  ~except with dinos.

Also let me predict this... that great white shark will be used as a punching bag at some point in the movie.  :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on Jan 18, 2015, 03:33:12 PM
Quote from: DarthJoker45 on Jan 18, 2015, 04:22:08 AM
The folks over at jurassicworldnews.com (http://www.jurassicworldnews.com/community/forums/topic/39532) of Scified.com have been sent an exclusive pic of the I-Rex toy. It teases a major scene in the film.

Spoiler


(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FjHjvtp2.png&hash=e9a547246cca281a5a43242d9ed426ed02746695)

[close]

Lol at that name, seems like he's going to be the first dinosaur hip-hop artist  :D

Doesn't look too bad though... the snout looks a bit weird... surely an ugly MF.

I'm not sure this has been posted already... probably yes, but then just for comparison sake, the "real" picture of dis I-Rex, looks a little bit less goofy:

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.screenrant.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FJurassic-Wolrd-Indominus-Rex-1.jpg&hash=00898c37e3690f6b9cf9527f506e20c8f43b9bc4)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.screenrant.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FJurassic-Wolrd-Indominus-Rex-2.jpg&hash=b591bf40bb842193ab260f1e0c3e1bf60782ef74)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Jan 18, 2015, 04:10:48 PM
Quote from: Wrecktangle on Jan 18, 2015, 06:47:35 AM
Quote from: DarthJoker45 on Jan 18, 2015, 04:22:08 AM
The folks over at jurassicworldnews.com (http://www.jurassicworldnews.com/community/forums/topic/39532) of Scified.com have been sent an exclusive pic of the I-Rex toy. It teases a major scene in the film.

Spoiler


(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FjHjvtp2.png&hash=e9a547246cca281a5a43242d9ed426ed02746695)

[close]

If they pull another JP3, I'm not going to be happy.

Don't worry, they won't. OG T-rex is gonna kick that freak's ass and all will be right with the world.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BonesawT101 on Jan 18, 2015, 06:06:06 PM
fingers crossed we get a dino training montage inspired by rocky 4
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 20, 2015, 12:01:34 PM
I asked Colin how the edit was going...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi60.tinypic.com%2F2zrls9l.png&hash=d851b954759910b6cc9faa6f05cd5b0a771ea878)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Jan 20, 2015, 02:56:19 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Jan 17, 2015, 06:02:21 PM
Ladies and gentlemen ... the entire plot of the Jurassic Park series and it's overall message.

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F40.media.tumblr.com%2F424310b7d14a9c1596a5cbd545ff7a4f%2Ftumblr_nfmgzibdyd1s36jhoo1_1280.png&hash=293d11bc32b4bd6ec4bad0773b7f93895bb48140)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F40.media.tumblr.com%2Fc26608071bf880707442e1cadef5a3f2%2Ftumblr_nfmgzibdyd1s36jhoo2_1280.png&hash=4016d8054428a3437f81392a6ac5e4a5c2c48368)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F40.media.tumblr.com%2Faf89d2875d79f7ad38c2ae15394e2972%2Ftumblr_nfmgzibdyd1s36jhoo3_1280.png&hash=26aa9dd3d1b0f9ca1af5879d6e7d951e490c8843)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F41.media.tumblr.com%2Fc82fee1ab66d38a863f39a3cf9d46e1d%2Ftumblr_nfmgzibdyd1s36jhoo4_1280.png&hash=cdb94f1652c59f169fbae2b79fe070a4f3d02f9b)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F41.media.tumblr.com%2F215dbf2052b7a73142698e9d1e7b5d3f%2Ftumblr_nfmgzibdyd1s36jhoo5_1280.png&hash=9497c388d59a246b53dd46f63a6919bd5fe158f5)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F36.media.tumblr.com%2Fdd365f1c6d19508d06ae2f0d36f8d26b%2Ftumblr_nfmgzibdyd1s36jhoo6_1280.png&hash=26af4d4f1a14cd60424df7376f9d9838ebc1b1c6)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F41.media.tumblr.com%2F3e7c00675d592a0711aab4aafb0382e2%2Ftumblr_nfmgzibdyd1s36jhoo7_1280.png&hash=6138debbd26cc68004d225ad323f6866cccc2971)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F41.media.tumblr.com%2F5e76ae29bf4fff05764be42cad9d9a7b%2Ftumblr_nfmgzibdyd1s36jhoo8_1280.png&hash=1318071f4d21a41ff08f2f50740bb3717f4ff6e0)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F40.media.tumblr.com%2F35c337683182fab5ce5e1503a68a432d%2Ftumblr_nfmgzibdyd1s36jhoo9_1280.png&hash=cc60f0fe121b530842a78763d475e31d914bed88)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F36.media.tumblr.com%2F3797b234aba243d578b229c6830e6e29%2Ftumblr_nfmgzibdyd1s36jhoo10_400.jpg&hash=56137a36f716a1351e6a8395d98db6888b0cf3a1)
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]

:D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jan 21, 2015, 01:11:29 AM
Quote from: First Blood on Jan 20, 2015, 02:56:19 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Jan 17, 2015, 06:02:21 PM
Ladies and gentlemen ... the entire plot of the Jurassic Park series and it's overall message.

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F40.media.tumblr.com%2F424310b7d14a9c1596a5cbd545ff7a4f%2Ftumblr_nfmgzibdyd1s36jhoo1_1280.png&hash=293d11bc32b4bd6ec4bad0773b7f93895bb48140)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F40.media.tumblr.com%2Fc26608071bf880707442e1cadef5a3f2%2Ftumblr_nfmgzibdyd1s36jhoo2_1280.png&hash=4016d8054428a3437f81392a6ac5e4a5c2c48368)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F40.media.tumblr.com%2Faf89d2875d79f7ad38c2ae15394e2972%2Ftumblr_nfmgzibdyd1s36jhoo3_1280.png&hash=26aa9dd3d1b0f9ca1af5879d6e7d951e490c8843)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F41.media.tumblr.com%2Fc82fee1ab66d38a863f39a3cf9d46e1d%2Ftumblr_nfmgzibdyd1s36jhoo4_1280.png&hash=cdb94f1652c59f169fbae2b79fe070a4f3d02f9b)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F41.media.tumblr.com%2F215dbf2052b7a73142698e9d1e7b5d3f%2Ftumblr_nfmgzibdyd1s36jhoo5_1280.png&hash=9497c388d59a246b53dd46f63a6919bd5fe158f5)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F36.media.tumblr.com%2Fdd365f1c6d19508d06ae2f0d36f8d26b%2Ftumblr_nfmgzibdyd1s36jhoo6_1280.png&hash=26af4d4f1a14cd60424df7376f9d9838ebc1b1c6)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F41.media.tumblr.com%2F3e7c00675d592a0711aab4aafb0382e2%2Ftumblr_nfmgzibdyd1s36jhoo7_1280.png&hash=6138debbd26cc68004d225ad323f6866cccc2971)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F41.media.tumblr.com%2F5e76ae29bf4fff05764be42cad9d9a7b%2Ftumblr_nfmgzibdyd1s36jhoo8_1280.png&hash=1318071f4d21a41ff08f2f50740bb3717f4ff6e0)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F40.media.tumblr.com%2F35c337683182fab5ce5e1503a68a432d%2Ftumblr_nfmgzibdyd1s36jhoo9_1280.png&hash=cc60f0fe121b530842a78763d475e31d914bed88)
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F36.media.tumblr.com%2F3797b234aba243d578b229c6830e6e29%2Ftumblr_nfmgzibdyd1s36jhoo10_400.jpg&hash=56137a36f716a1351e6a8395d98db6888b0cf3a1)
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]

:D
Wait one minute... who's fault is it for the creation of woman?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jan 22, 2015, 04:26:24 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 20, 2015, 12:01:34 PM
I asked Colin how the edit was going...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi60.tinypic.com%2F2zrls9l.png&hash=d851b954759910b6cc9faa6f05cd5b0a771ea878)

Awesome!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 24, 2015, 10:49:17 PM
I attended the Royal Ontario Museum's Dinos Invade! (http://www.rom.on.ca/en/activities-programs/events-calendar/dinosaur-weekend) event today and watched the following lecture:

Quote3:00 pm – Back to Jurassic Park: Where Fossil Fact Meets Science Fiction
Talk by Brian Switek, National Geographic
When it premiered in 1993, Jurassic Park immediately became the greatest dinosaur movie of all time. The film's puppet and CGI creations helped usher in a new image of dinosaurs as fast, clever animals. But in the 21 years since the movie debuted, dinosaurs have kept changing. Even famous dinosaurs like Tyrannosaurus and Velociraptor are different than they used to be. In this talk, National Geographic blogger and JurassicWorld.com's "resident paleontologist" Brian Switek will catch you up on the latest science that is continuing to change our understanding of our favorite celebrity dinosaurs.

Brian gave an excellent talk and really thrilled me. He highlighted what I've been saying for a long time: accurate dinosaurs matter. He also let me in on a few tidbits about the movie.

Spoiler
The film will explain why the dinosaurs have no feathers, the new trailer will feature the D.Rex rather prominently (which means I'm avoiding it!), and Colin really does respect the science behind dinosaurs. He didn't necessarily intend, apparently, to troll fans with the "No feathers" tweet.
[close]

For more Brian Switek, check him out here. (http://www.brianswitek.com/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jan 24, 2015, 11:13:41 PM
I don't think Brian ever sleeps, and presumably takes all his meals in tablet form. 70% of the internet's Mesozoic writing seems to come from him.
No bad thing, he's a decent writer.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 25, 2015, 06:31:06 AM
You would have loved this Dino Weekend. You'd have been all over Dace Evans, lol. And Switek is also hilarious. He's a geeky scientist type.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Jan 27, 2015, 11:58:32 PM
It seems that the hybrid dinosaur from Jurassic world was originally named
Spoiler
Diablous Rex aka D-Rex, but has been renamed Indominus Rex aka I-Rex which translates into "Fierce/untamable king".  I know this is really minor, but I liked the original name MUCH better, it sounded more sinister.
[close]

Source (warning: link contains picture of new hybrid dinosaur at the bottom of the page): http://www.movieweb.com/jurassic-world-d-rex-hybrid-dinosaur-photo?utm_source=zergnet.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=zergnet_370698 (http://www.movieweb.com/jurassic-world-d-rex-hybrid-dinosaur-photo?utm_source=zergnet.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=zergnet_370698)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Jan 28, 2015, 01:18:14 AM
Oldish news. 

Hopefully the easy name change means that it won't be stated in the film.  Either one sounds kind of cheesy to me anyway...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Jan 28, 2015, 01:26:36 AM
Yeah I know it's old news, I just wanted to say it. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Jan 28, 2015, 04:55:59 AM
https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpf1/t31.0-8/10942571_768845226536816_4804012094085882242_o.jpg

Apparently this photo can be found on the movie website
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Sozin on Jan 28, 2015, 06:09:29 AM
Quote from: frenchfries on Jan 28, 2015, 04:55:59 AM
https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpf1/t31.0-8/10942571_768845226536816_4804012094085882242_o.jpg

Apparently this photo can be found on the movie website

Is that the D-Rex? :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Jan 28, 2015, 06:25:03 AM
Where? I can't see anything haha.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 28, 2015, 06:28:26 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F24.media.tumblr.com%2FkDHdUCV8lpcnidrrOtpubOqZo1_400.jpg&hash=c4df953fef2de200ab06077bc2d98458287f19d2)

"I'm not leaving this spot until I see that f**king D-Rex."
Title: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Jan 28, 2015, 07:09:26 AM
You guys mean the I-Rex as we will now be calling it?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Sozin on Jan 28, 2015, 08:52:43 AM
Quote from: MudButt on Jan 28, 2015, 06:25:03 AM
Where? I can't see anything haha.

I don't know if this is a joke, given the nature of the picture, but it's in camouflage.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jan 28, 2015, 09:45:17 AM
Looks more like a water sprinkler in action to me, far right window.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jan 28, 2015, 10:59:40 AM
All I see is ass and palm trees!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Sozin on Jan 28, 2015, 02:12:32 PM
Crazy Rich could be right, but here's what I'm seeing. :laugh:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fyt8axqU.jpg&hash=2a1892a228133adcd07dc30ac7ffa887e31cd873)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 28, 2015, 02:14:33 PM
Now that you outlined it I see it, but I'm not sure...

Let the Predators-type speculation ensue :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naissus on Jan 28, 2015, 02:17:39 PM
I hope this produces a series of Jurassic World inspired games.  Something along the lines of Dino Crisis or the SNES Jurassic Park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Jan 28, 2015, 04:00:12 PM
Wow, never would've seen that haha.

I had a dream about this movie last night haha, I dreamt about the hybrids camouflage technique and it was a bit more like invisibility, Hollow Man style where you see it's bones and body tissues and organs appear until the actual flesh is visible. It was a bit out there but looked cool in my dream haha.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master on Jan 28, 2015, 04:45:08 PM
So we've got stealth ultra predator dino? Meh. I was hoping for more chameleon like camuflage, not invisibility.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jan 28, 2015, 04:47:04 PM
That straight white part just in front of BDH is the reflection of her dress.

Looks like a sprinkler on the right as Rich said.

The rest looks like hot spots where sunlight is reflecting on lighter surfaces on the trees.

But it's awesome/haunting to think - God there could be a dinosaur right there. It would never go hungry that's for sure.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jan 28, 2015, 04:49:47 PM
Am I the only one who finds the idea of an invisible dinosaur... stupid?

It's barely above the man-dino hybrid mercenaries they were apparently originally going to go with.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master on Jan 28, 2015, 05:35:19 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Jan 28, 2015, 04:49:47 PM
Am I the only one who finds the idea of an invisible dinosaur... stupid?

It's barely above the man-dino hybrid mercenaries they were apparently originally going to go with.
With you on this one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 28, 2015, 06:01:56 PM
*Ahem*

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fd.gr-assets.com%2Fbooks%2F1386864575l%2F8650.jpg&hash=128e37796a040c759b08b9c76e3c05cd69d1ab8d)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Jan 28, 2015, 06:04:37 PM

Quote from: Master on Jan 28, 2015, 04:45:08 PM
So we've got stealth ultra predator dino? Meh. I was hoping for more chameleon like camuflage, not invisibility.

Have you ever played The Lost World: Jurassic Park arcade game?  There was an invisible carnotaurus as a boss.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Jan 28, 2015, 06:35:50 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Jan 28, 2015, 04:49:47 PM
Am I the only one who finds the idea of an invisible dinosaur... stupid?

It's barely above the man-dino hybrid mercenaries they were apparently originally going to go with.
How can you think its stupid when it was in the second book (camouflaged dinosaurs)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 28, 2015, 06:41:13 PM
I think some people think camouflage = totally invisible.

Which is not the case for JW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jan 28, 2015, 06:53:31 PM
Quote from: frenchfries on Jan 28, 2015, 06:35:50 PMHow can you think its stupid when it was in the second book (camouflaged dinosaurs)

Camouflage is fine so long as it's done subtly, but given the genetic cross-breeding thing they're going for in the film, I'm not sure it will be.

As for the books, I honestly didn't think much to them. The Lost World was OK but I thought the Jurassic Park film was far superior to the first novel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master on Jan 28, 2015, 06:56:57 PM
Quote from: predxeno on Jan 28, 2015, 06:04:37 PM

Quote from: Master on Jan 28, 2015, 04:45:08 PM
So we've got stealth ultra predator dino? Meh. I was hoping for more chameleon like camuflage, not invisibility.

Have you ever played The Lost World: Jurassic Park arcade game?  There was an invisible carnotaurus as a boss.

nope

Quote from: frenchfries on Jan 28, 2015, 06:35:50 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Jan 28, 2015, 04:49:47 PM
Am I the only one who finds the idea of an invisible dinosaur... stupid?

It's barely above the man-dino hybrid mercenaries they were apparently originally going to go with.
How can you think its stupid when it was in the second book (camouflaged dinosaurs)

Still stupid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 28, 2015, 07:24:48 PM
You haven't even seen it in action. I doubt it's going to look like the Predator's camo effect.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 28, 2015, 07:29:51 PM
Yup. I'm definitely expecting something more along the lines of

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdevsnippets.com%2Fimg%2Fcamouflage%2F26.jpg&hash=0c35b928050a6d9550d3dd385cd60e9db7801dc6)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcreationrevolution.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F03%2FCamouflage-Chameleon.jpg&hash=d2d6ee9f907ef3a25a297ea62abd325980ac2649)

If they even use the concept at all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Jan 28, 2015, 07:54:42 PM
Considering it has cuttlefish DNA i would think it camouflage abilities are more in line with that than a chameleon. Still don't see how this concept is stupid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Jan 28, 2015, 07:56:31 PM
I'm fine with it, makes for some real good tense scenes if done right.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 28, 2015, 07:58:30 PM
It was awesome in that Lost World game.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 28, 2015, 08:05:07 PM
Quote from: frenchfries on Jan 28, 2015, 07:54:42 PM
Considering it has cuttlefish DNA
You know, I would find this heaps of stupid, weren't it for the fact they've actually done things like this -- glowing rabbits with jellyfish DNA (http://www.cbsnews.com/news/living-breathing-glowing-rabbits-successfully-born/) and other foul ideas.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Sozin on Jan 28, 2015, 08:07:09 PM
I just looked up the Cuttlefish. Amazing little creature. :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: First Blood on Jan 28, 2015, 08:10:45 PM
f**king backstabbing bastard i am on to you
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 28, 2015, 08:13:12 PM
Quote from: Laufey on Jan 28, 2015, 08:07:09 PM
I just looked up the Cuttlefish. Amazing little creature. :o
I love Cuttlefishes.

(https://lookatthatf**kingcuttlefish.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/baby_cuttlefish_by_mentaldstruction.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Sozin on Jan 28, 2015, 08:20:00 PM
It's Lovecraft in the flesh. Of course you do! ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master on Jan 28, 2015, 08:31:23 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jan 28, 2015, 07:24:48 PM
You haven't even seen it in action. I doubt it's going to look like the Predator's camo effect.
True, but if it really is on that picture then it is totally invisible like Predator (including eyes). If it's like chameleon then I'm ok with it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 28, 2015, 08:37:57 PM
I don't think it's in the picture at all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master on Jan 28, 2015, 08:43:34 PM
As do I. And I hope we are right.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 28, 2015, 09:03:57 PM
Yeah, if it were totally invisible, this would just be a remake of Tekken: The Motion Picture. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jan 28, 2015, 09:58:00 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PmDTtkZlMwM#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PmDTtkZlMwM#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master on Jan 28, 2015, 10:33:45 PM
Those are true aliens! Most impressive.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 28, 2015, 10:34:41 PM
So in other words...

Spoiler
OctoCamo. 8)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jan 29, 2015, 08:28:38 AM
The octopus is an amazing creature. One of the most intelligent things on the planet. Just this morning I saw a vid on Facebook of someone sealing one inside a jar and the thing undid the lid from the inside, threw it away, then decided the jar made a nice little house and just sat in there, all lord of the manor-style.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 29, 2015, 09:13:13 AM
Yeah. The only reason they haven't gone beyond what they are is their limited lifespan and their lack of 'social' intelligence.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master on Jan 29, 2015, 09:37:36 AM
Lucky us then ;) Yeah, I always loved octopuses and seen allot material about them. Cute,  lovely, inteligent and terrifying.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jan 29, 2015, 12:39:22 PM
Don't forget that they are also very tasty.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master on Jan 29, 2015, 03:37:35 PM
Yeah, that's the way i like them too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 29, 2015, 06:36:58 PM
New CEO blog...

http://www.masraniglobal.com/media/index.html (http://www.masraniglobal.com/media/index.html)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jurassicworld.com%2Fmedia%2Fhome%2Findominus-rex-interstitial.jpg&hash=3f8184d131b870604dd1b87a514a95fa86155d1b)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jan 30, 2015, 02:59:43 AM
QuoteName Meaning: Fierce or Untamable King
Habitat: Jurassic World
Length: Currently 40 ft
Weight: TBD
Origin: Hammond Creation Lab
Agression Index: Very High
Diet: Carnivore

We set out to make Indominus the most fearsome dinosuar ever to be displayed at Jurassic world. The genetic engineers at our Hammond Creation Lab have more than delivered.

At first glance, Indominus most closely resembles a T-Rex, but its distinctive head ornamentation and ultra-tough bony osteoderms can be traced from Theropods known as Abeliosaurs. Indominus' horns have been placed above the eye orbit through genetic material hybridized from Carnotaurus, Majungasaurus, Rugops, and Giganotosaurus. Fearsome indeed.

Indominus' roar is estimated to reach 140-160db - the same as a 747 taking off and landing. And it can reach speeds of 30 mph... while confined to its enclosure. Come experience Indominus Rex for yourself beginning this summer. If you dare.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FmMaopJE.jpg&hash=032048ca8fd355c83420092c5e2ec672983ef36c)

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/KingPatel/news/?a=114549 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/KingPatel/news/?a=114549)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 30, 2015, 06:43:02 AM
Looks like a close-up of those V.Rexes from King Kong.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 30, 2015, 06:46:18 AM
For some reason your remark makes me want to put together a Hetalia style anime, starring T-Rex, V-Rex, and I-Rex. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jan 30, 2015, 07:48:05 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Jan 30, 2015, 02:59:43 AM
QuoteName Meaning: Fierce or Untamable King
Habitat: Jurassic World
Length: Currently 40 ft
Weight: TBD
Origin: Hammond Creation Lab
Agression Index: Very High
Diet: Carnivore

We set out to make Indominus the most fearsome dinosuar ever to be displayed at Jurassic world. The genetic engineers at our Hammond Creation Lab have more than delivered.

At first glance, Indominus most closely resembles a T-Rex, but its distinctive head ornamentation and ultra-tough bony osteoderms can be traced from Theropods known as Abeliosaurs. Indominus' horns have been placed above the eye orbit through genetic material hybridized from Carnotaurus, Majungasaurus, Rugops, and Giganotosaurus. Fearsome indeed.

Indominus' roar is estimated to reach 140-160db - the same as a 747 taking off and landing. And it can reach speeds of 30 mph... while confined to its enclosure. Come experience Indominus Rex for yourself beginning this summer. If you dare.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FmMaopJE.jpg&hash=032048ca8fd355c83420092c5e2ec672983ef36c)

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/KingPatel/news/?a=114549 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/KingPatel/news/?a=114549)
What? No mention of bullet proof armor plating or fire breathing? I bet the thing can't even do camouflage or do lasers. What a disappointment.  >:(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: AvatarIII on Jan 30, 2015, 10:58:09 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Jan 30, 2015, 02:59:43 AM
QuoteName Meaning: Fierce or Untamable King
Habitat: Jurassic World
Length: Currently 40 ft
Weight: TBD
Origin: Hammond Creation Lab
Agression Index: Very High
Diet: Carnivore

We set out to make Indominus the most fearsome dinosuar ever to be displayed at Jurassic world. The genetic engineers at our Hammond Creation Lab have more than delivered.

At first glance, Indominus most closely resembles a T-Rex, but its distinctive head ornamentation and ultra-tough bony osteoderms can be traced from Theropods known as Abeliosaurs. Indominus' horns have been placed above the eye orbit through genetic material hybridized from Carnotaurus, Majungasaurus, Rugops, and Giganotosaurus. Fearsome indeed.

Indominus' roar is estimated to reach 140-160db - the same as a 747 taking off and landing. And it can reach speeds of 30 mph... while confined to its enclosure. Come experience Indominus Rex for yourself beginning this summer. If you dare.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FmMaopJE.jpg&hash=032048ca8fd355c83420092c5e2ec672983ef36c)

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/KingPatel/news/?a=114549 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/KingPatel/news/?a=114549)

so how many engineered dinos will there be? The V. Rex, the I. Rex? what else?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Sozin on Jan 30, 2015, 10:59:49 AM
There's only one - the I-Rex. Which was previously known as the D-Rex. The V-Rex is from King Kong. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: AvatarIII on Jan 30, 2015, 11:03:30 AM
Quote from: Laufey on Jan 30, 2015, 10:59:49 AM
There's only one - the I-Rex. Which was previously known as the D-Rex. The V-Rex is from King Kong. :P

lol, i meant the D-Rex, that makes sense though, what did the D stand for anyway?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 30, 2015, 11:07:21 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FLzdKqjo.gif&hash=1b04eadb770f0b9d47979a20816220a74cbbf9e3)

You'd wonder how it'd get such teeth with none of the Dinosaurs 'blended' into it having them.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Sozin on Jan 30, 2015, 11:22:29 AM
Quote from: AvatarIII on Jan 30, 2015, 11:03:30 AM
Quote from: Laufey on Jan 30, 2015, 10:59:49 AM
There's only one - the I-Rex. Which was previously known as the D-Rex. The V-Rex is from King Kong. :P

lol, i meant the D-Rex, that makes sense though, what did the D stand for anyway?

Diabolus
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: vikingr on Jan 30, 2015, 12:01:03 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Jan 28, 2015, 06:53:31 PM
Quote from: frenchfries on Jan 28, 2015, 06:35:50 PMHow can you think its stupid when it was in the second book (camouflaged dinosaurs)

Camouflage is fine so long as it's done subtly, but given the genetic cross-breeding thing they're going for in the film, I'm not sure it will be.

As for the books, I honestly didn't think much to them. The Lost World was OK but I thought the Jurassic Park film was far superior to the first novel.

Wow, I completely disagree. The first novel was far more superior to the first movie imho. The theories about the world, nature and all that stuff from Malcolm was so fascinating and special. It's almost gone in the movie.

While the first movie was still pretty good, the following two just sucked big times. The second could have been much better when it had been closer to the second novel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 30, 2015, 12:20:30 PM
Quote from: vikingr on Jan 30, 2015, 12:01:03 PM
Wow, I completely disagree. While the first movie was still pretty good, the following two just sucked big times. The second could have been much better when it had been closer to the second novel.

Wow, I completely disagree.

The JP movies are different kettles of fish compared to the books. I'm thankful we have two variants of the worlds Crichton wrote.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: vikingr on Jan 30, 2015, 12:47:58 PM
I felt like Crichtons movie script was made for the dump mainstream movie watchers, while the book kept the real core of the story.

And because movie 2 and 3 were so daman bad, I'm not excited to see Jurassic World. The short summary I read about it didn't sound great as well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 30, 2015, 12:51:35 PM
Fair enough.

Although you could say the books were written for the dump mainstream book readers. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jan 30, 2015, 01:21:36 PM
I liked the science in the book, but I don't remember the dino attack scenes being at all thrilling, and I really didn't like Hammond and Malcolm compared to their movie counterparts.

The second book was better, aside from the magical resurrection of Malcolm and the lack of Pete Postlethwaite, who rules. But I don't remember being especially blown away by either.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: vikingr on Jan 30, 2015, 01:22:11 PM
Well I see from an intelectual point of view: Books > Movies

But still I don't think like that about dump mainstream movie watchers, but feel Crichton could have thought like that, leaving, what is for ke the most important part of the story, out of the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jan 30, 2015, 01:40:54 PM
Quote from: vikingr on Jan 30, 2015, 12:47:58 PM
I felt like Crichtons movie script was made for the dump mainstream movie watchers, while the book kept the real core of the story.

And because movie 2 and 3 were so daman bad, I'm not excited to see Jurassic World. The short summary I read about it didn't sound great as well.
TLW was bad? Waaaat??

The book is way better sure but the movie is still great. Save for Kelly's acrobatics  ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: vikingr on Jan 30, 2015, 02:31:53 PM
The part when the T-Rex arrived in New York ruined the whole movie for me. So I don't like it at all, mostly because of that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jan 30, 2015, 02:36:30 PM
Quote from: vikingr on Jan 30, 2015, 02:31:53 PMThe part when the T-Rex arrived in New York ruined the whole movie for me.

San Diego.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jan 30, 2015, 03:37:34 PM
I definitely prefer the book, but the film's an incredibly well-done adaptation of the core concepts, and resulted in a script way in advance of almost every Hollywood blockbuster. Plus of course you have the added element of the film being such an incredible landmark for technology and production.

I just wish Crichton had made scripts for the subsequent films. They're good fun, but they're not anywhere near as well-written.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on Jan 30, 2015, 03:44:28 PM
Quote from: vikingr on Jan 30, 2015, 02:31:53 PM
The part when the T-Rex arrived in New York ruined the whole movie for me. So I don't like it at all, mostly because of that.

The only masterpiece in the JP-Series is No. 1. It's flawless in all the right places: Plot, Story-Design, Actors, Effects, pace.

TLW was more or less a simple "more, bigger and better"-revisiting of the Franchise. It did have a lot of the heart and spirit of number 1, but was flawed quite a bit. The T-Rex arriving in San Diego was the only really new thing in the movie, so for me, that was actually the saviour of that film, since we never saw a Dinosaur in a human surrounding before in the JP-universe.

JP 3 was absolutely heartless and therefore lackluster. Not one original concept was introduced, but just more of the same old elements were thrown in. It's a mediocre version of JP 1, with the Spinosaurus replacing the T-Rex... still love that fight scene though  ;D

JW at least seems to give a shit about franchise-progress in the sense that this time, the Park is actually open and running. So far that's the only new thing I can see in this movie... could be executed really well if they focus on the mass-panic aspect. There's also the underwater addition that could be really cool, but I fear that the Mosasaurus will simply become a gimmick (oh look, we have an underwater-dino to please the fanboys). Other than that, I see little hope for this movie. I'm obviously gonna watch it right when it comes out, but my hopes aren't high, the JP-Franchise itself simply doesn't guarantee high-quality movies per se... it's more like a hit and miss.
Also the clone-dinosaur... Intercourse-Rex or whatever... I'm all for it! But if it's just a bigger and badder T-Rex with more teeth, it's simply not worth the fuss and becomes absolutely underwhelming.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: vikingr on Jan 30, 2015, 03:53:45 PM
Oh yeah San Diego. My fault. It's been a long time since I watched the second movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Jan 30, 2015, 04:15:08 PM
TLW has its problems, but how can anymore not like a T-rex rampaging through a city?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KirklandSignature on Jan 30, 2015, 04:17:00 PM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Jan 30, 2015, 04:15:08 PM
TLW has its problems, but how can anymore not like a T-rex rampaging through a city?


It's a cliché that harkens back to Godzilla and his boyfriends rampaging through cities.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: vikingr on Jan 30, 2015, 04:18:56 PM
Well its nothing new: Godzilla was there long before and they didn't made it anything special. And even if you want a T-Rex rampaging in a big city it could've been done much better imho.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 30, 2015, 04:27:13 PM
The second film's finale is the coronation and the pay-off of what they had been setting up for the entire movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 30, 2015, 04:49:10 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jan 30, 2015, 04:27:13 PM
The second film's finale is the coronation and the pay-off of what they had been setting up for the entire movie.

Exactly.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Jan 30, 2015, 07:32:16 PM
Quote from: KirklandSignature on Jan 30, 2015, 04:17:00 PM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Jan 30, 2015, 04:15:08 PM
TLW has its problems, but how can anymore not like a T-rex rampaging through a city?


It's a cliché that harkens back to Godzilla and his boyfriends rampaging through cities.

And that's exactly what Spielberg was aiming for. It's a tribute (said by himself) which also makes sense within the film because:

Quote from: Omegazilla on Jan 30, 2015, 04:27:13 PM
The second film's finale is the coronation and the pay-off of what they had been setting up for the entire movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Jan 30, 2015, 11:29:32 PM
wasnt the the lost world also a semi-adaptation of that old film of the same name where a dinosaur rampages in a city.

Quote from: Tangakkai on Jan 30, 2015, 03:44:28 PM
Quote from: vikingr on Jan 30, 2015, 02:31:53 PM
The part when the T-Rex arrived in New York ruined the whole movie for me. So I don't like it at all, mostly because of that.

The only masterpiece in the JP-Series is No. 1. It's flawless in all the right places: Plot, Story-Design, Actors, Effects, pace.

TLW was more or less a simple "more, bigger and better"-revisiting of the Franchise. It did have a lot of the heart and spirit of number 1, but was flawed quite a bit. The T-Rex arriving in San Diego was the only really new thing in the movie, so for me, that was actually the saviour of that film, since we never saw a Dinosaur in a human surrounding before in the JP-universe.

JP 3 was absolutely heartless and therefore lackluster. Not one original concept was introduced, but just more of the same old elements were thrown in. It's a mediocre version of JP 1, with the Spinosaurus replacing the T-Rex... still love that fight scene though  ;D

JW at least seems to give a shit about franchise-progress in the sense that this time, the Park is actually open and running. So far that's the only new thing I can see in this movie... could be executed really well if they focus on the mass-panic aspect. There's also the underwater addition that could be really cool, but I fear that the Mosasaurus will simply become a gimmick (oh look, we have an underwater-dino to please the fanboys). Other than that, I see little hope for this movie. I'm obviously gonna watch it right when it comes out, but my hopes aren't high, the JP-Franchise itself simply doesn't guarantee high-quality movies per se... it's more like a hit and miss.
Also the clone-dinosaur... Intercourse-Rex or whatever... I'm all for it! But if it's just a bigger and badder T-Rex with more teeth, it's simply not worth the fuss and becomes absolutely underwhelming.
I-rex has camo abilities haha doesnt seem underwhelming to me
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jan 31, 2015, 05:12:04 AM
Actually aren't there other hybrid dinos? Perhaps the trailer is only hinting at the first publicly announced hybrid while keeping the iRex a secret in the movie. In some toy material releases there is a stegosaurus triceratops mutant for example.

Also I know a lot of people that hate the San Diego attack but I mean come on, it was the logical next step. First you create dinosaurs, then you show the viewer why creating dinosaurs was a really bad idea. As an added plus we got to see what a T-Rex could accomplish if set free on city streets. JPIII... I'm not sure what the point of that was except to piss on the T-Rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Jan 31, 2015, 08:33:48 AM
The Lost World is a lot like another Spielberg sequel - Indy and the Temple of Doom. At times darker and more mean-spirited than the film that came before, but ridiculously entertaining in an over the top and logic defying manner.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 31, 2015, 04:26:55 PM
Posted by Trevorrow on Twitter.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B8sNvPyCUAIxgbt.jpg:large)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Jan 31, 2015, 06:51:02 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 31, 2015, 04:26:55 PM
Posted by Trevorrow on Twitter.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B8sNvPyCUAIxgbt.jpg:large
its beautiful  :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naissus on Jan 31, 2015, 08:13:54 PM
Looks like JP1 raptor
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Feb 01, 2015, 12:49:10 AM
Quote from: Naissus on Jan 31, 2015, 08:13:54 PM
Looks like JP1 raptor
Yasss
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Feb 01, 2015, 02:44:12 PM
Quote from: Gilfryd on Jan 31, 2015, 08:33:48 AMThe Lost World is a lot like another Spielberg sequel - Indy and the Temple of Doom. At times darker and more mean-spirited than the film that came before, but ridiculously entertaining in an over the top and logic defying manner.

This. Well put.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 01, 2015, 08:00:30 PM
Websites updated...

www.JurassicWorld.com (http://www.jurassicworld.com)

www.Masraniglobal.com (http://www.masraniglobal.com)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Feb 01, 2015, 08:30:16 PM
I was checking it yesterday.  Mosasaur's up, if anyone wanted to see a poor CGI render of it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 01, 2015, 08:35:14 PM
Mosasaur is not a dinosaur. Good God. Nor is Pteranodon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Feb 01, 2015, 08:47:16 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dinosaurfact.net%2FPictures%2FDimorphodon.jpg&hash=c744a2f05b48a66ce9424b423e7221c19bdf188e)

I too, would like to report racially insensitive labeling of my species as "dinosaur."



To be fair, they note that the Mosasaur isn't an actual dinosaur on the little profile thingy.  And on another note - I really really really hope the movie looks better than these renders on the website.  Not a fan at all of what I'm seeing.  The Stegosaurus looks so bad, anatomically even, compared to what was seen in JPII.  :-X
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 01, 2015, 08:50:09 PM
I really do hope those are just models made for merchandising, because they aren't accurate renderings of the previous films' dinosaurs. I mean, it's like a variation of the designs in proportions et all. But it's not 'them'.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Feb 01, 2015, 09:03:21 PM
I read an interesting bit about Tyrannosaurus Rex Kingdom on the site, if the scratches on T-Rex aren't convincing enough...

QuoteIt's T.Rex's world - the rest of us are just visiting it. Enter into the Jurassic-sized viewing area to see the legendary predatory in her natural domain. After all, she's been living on Isla Nublar for over twenty-five years! Feedings are scheduled every two hours. Warning: This attraction may be too intense for children and some adults.

On the models on the site, I think that has to be for merchandising purposes and not the final movie product.... right?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Feb 01, 2015, 09:06:08 PM
But would it make sense for the Tyrannosaurus in the original Jurassic Park to only have been 3 years old?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Feb 01, 2015, 09:40:13 PM
From what I've read it's because of genetic tinkering that the dinosaurs could reach maturity rapidly yet their average life span be unchanged.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 01, 2015, 09:49:08 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Feb 01, 2015, 08:50:09 PM
I really do hope those are just models made for merchandising, because they aren't accurate renderings of the previous films' dinosaurs. I mean, it's like a variation of the designs in proportions et all. But it's not 'them'.

They're like the CG renders you get in museums of animals. Obviously not film CG. ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Feb 01, 2015, 10:08:36 PM
Why would museums do that?  I've never seen that in my life.  And the American Museum of Natural History was my childhood dojo.

Wouldn't it make more sense for the theme park to show "actual" photos of the creatures, to sell itself?

Quote from: Crazy Rich on Feb 01, 2015, 09:40:13 PM
From what I've read it's because of genetic tinkering that the dinosaurs could reach maturity rapidly yet their average life span be unchanged.

Hm...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Feb 01, 2015, 10:15:00 PM
Quote from: MrSpaceJockey on Feb 01, 2015, 10:08:36 PM
Why would museums do that?  I've never seen that in my life.  And the American Museum of Natural History was my childhood dojo.


I have seen museums with images like that. They're prob using renders like that because of they are not done rending the cgi
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 01, 2015, 10:15:23 PM
Quote from: MrSpaceJockey on Feb 01, 2015, 10:08:36 PM
Wouldn't it make more sense for the theme park to show "actual" photos of the creatures, to sell itself?

Yes. But this is a movie which doesn't want to show off the goods just yet. ;)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Feb 01, 2015, 10:18:25 PM
Quote from: frenchfries on Feb 01, 2015, 10:15:00 PM
Quote from: MrSpaceJockey on Feb 01, 2015, 10:08:36 PM
Why would museums do that?  I've never seen that in my life.  And the American Museum of Natural History was my childhood dojo.


I have seen museums with images like that. They're prob using renders like that because of they are not done rending the cgi

I think it's kind of weird for the museum not to just use an illustration or actual photos, but okay, that point is proven.

Quote from: Alien³ on Feb 01, 2015, 10:15:23 PM
Quote from: MrSpaceJockey on Feb 01, 2015, 10:08:36 PM
Wouldn't it make more sense for the theme park to show "actual" photos of the creatures, to sell itself?

Yes. But this is a movie which doesn't want to show off the goods just yet. ;)

:(  I rather see nothing at all than having my anticipation slightly soiled by brightly lit, poor renders.

But this is all of course nitpicky ramblings of a fan; obviously I don't have to look at the website or whatever.  Just hoping for the best for this film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 01, 2015, 11:37:44 PM
Jurassic Park 4!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mvWuky1g0g&hd=1 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mvWuky1g0g&hd=1)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 01, 2015, 11:44:35 PM
Looks... OK. It looks really slick, but at the expense of some of the "weight" of the original. Still, curious to see it when it comes out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Feb 01, 2015, 11:49:00 PM
I love it, although it will never be as amazing as Jurassic Park 1.

I hoped to see a glimpse of the original T-Rex, and I'm not really keen on the tamed Velociraptors, seems and feels unnatural to look at....
Aside of that I believe it will be a great film for the series, it's great to see the park up and running (for a while in the movie at least)

Edit: They changed the colors of the raptors? (In the scene with Pratt) In the leaked footage they were brown, also I thought there were two in that footage...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 01, 2015, 11:56:02 PM
It'll probably work better when I see the full scenes without all the quick trailer cuts, but as it is some of it just isn't sitting right with me. The I-Rex smashing through the vehicle at the end, for example, just seems really easy, like a fleeting reference to the original's T-Rex attacking the van with Tim and Lex in it rather than a scene with a significant weight all to its own. It has to do with the way it is shot, but I'm having trouble placing my finger on just what, exactly, is the element that's feeling off to me. I completely get that I'm judging a snippet of footage from a trailer that could be wildly different than the feel that the film itself will give off, but these are just my initial reactions. I'm still intrigued by what I'm seeing and hopeful for the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Feb 02, 2015, 01:09:28 AM
The effects don't look that bad to me. The worst shots are the ones I didn't like in the first trailer to begin with, which were the river raft bit and the shark they feed to the Mosasaur. Everything else looks passable to me given how long we have until the movie comes out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Feb 02, 2015, 01:22:15 AM
haha oh my, that new trailer was awesome. They really did improve on the T-Rex design. The iRex actually has useable arms. Which is awesome. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Feb 02, 2015, 01:28:54 AM
From what I've read the known species used in it's creation doesn't include T-rex, but rather Carnotaurus, Giganotosaurus, Majungasaurus, and Rugops.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Feb 02, 2015, 01:46:01 AM
Ahhh yes!!!  I was very very happy with seeing the raptors in this trailer.  The stripe along one of the raptors reminded me of the designs in JPIII, interestingly enough.  The Apatosaurus head they were interacting with had a bit of a deadeye look to it but hey - I really appreciate the use of practical effects.  Also like how this one was edited, music wise.

I'm happy with the amount of new footage we got.  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Feb 02, 2015, 01:51:03 AM
Yep, I'm satisfied with how much new footage we got out of this. Now my interest in the super bowl has ceased as I was only interested in Jurassic World. None of the other stuff I'm interested in like Star Wars was shown.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Feb 02, 2015, 02:25:21 AM
My favorite part is that they're not afraid of combating the dinosaurs, especially the I-Rex, which looks f**king awesome. Looks like a mixture of Jurassic Park and DinoCrisis... which I'm digging. The movie also implies it'll be pretty violent too, with the blood and pieces of torn flesh on the I-Rex's teeth after snatching up that dude, shown in the shot of it sniffing out Chris Pratt soon after. Also, the CGI in the reused shots from the first trailer are a LOT better, particularly in the Mosasaur jump-bite. May be the change in its brightness, the lack of emphasis on its eye, or just some added details, but it looks pretty great.

Quote from: MrSpaceJockey on Feb 02, 2015, 01:46:01 AM
The Apatosaurus head they were interacting with had a bit of a deadeye look to it
I think part of the reason for that was the blue eyes they gave it... which is an oddly humanistic choice. :s
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Feb 02, 2015, 03:52:32 AM
I really hope tons of people are killed in this, that'll make this movie 100x better, mass death at the hands of Dino's.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Feb 02, 2015, 04:02:32 AM
I know it's not the most exciting scene but I loved seeing the iRex getting away from the chopper firing the minigun. It looked terrifyingly powerful and the animation looked terrific. Also I wonder if it was the iRex that released the Pterodactyl's from there cages being that it is supposed to be smart. You know, sending in the dogs to spook the flock into running. The trailer straight up said that it was killing for sport.

All hints are that there will be a lot of blood in this one. After all they made this new dinosaur because people were bored of the normal ones.

Is the reason the mosasaurus seen is so much bigger than in reality because they genetically made it bigger to appease park goers boredom? If that is the case, makes me wonder what they did to the T-rex now... :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Feb 02, 2015, 04:29:28 AM

In the leaked footage the raptor cgi was from exactly the 1st movie.

Btw all the things in this looks great and intresting; D rex, raptors-pratt relationship,running park, new dinos, gun fight, d rex t rex spino fight probably.

But mostly it wilk be a dumb movie :/
That screaming kids shot in the end of the trailer makes me...


Quote from: The Son of Paragus on Feb 01, 2015, 11:49:00 PM
I love it, although it will never be as amazing as Jurassic Park 1.

I hoped to see a glimpse of the original T-Rex, and I'm not really keen on the tamed Velociraptors, seems and feels unnatural to look at....
Aside of that I believe it will be a great film for the series, it's great to see the park up and running (for a while in the movie at least)

Edit: They changed the colors of the raptors? (In the scene with Pratt) In the leaked footage they were brown, also I thought there were two in that footage...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Feb 02, 2015, 05:01:53 AM
Quote from: szkoki on Feb 02, 2015, 04:29:28 AM
But mostly it wilk be a dumb movie :/
That screaming kids shot in the end of the trailer makes me...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsmellthegrindstone.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F04%2Fjurassic-park-scary.jpg&hash=559a7fac0e3d90c608112099736c3293ef770305)

God damn it Jurassic Park, you are such a dumb movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Feb 02, 2015, 05:03:02 AM
And Ty Sympkins can actually act.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alienseseses on Feb 02, 2015, 05:16:35 AM
http://www.wired.com/2015/02/new-jurassic-world-trailer-hides-improved-cgi-plain-sight/?mbid=social_twitter (http://www.wired.com/2015/02/new-jurassic-world-trailer-hides-improved-cgi-plain-sight/?mbid=social_twitter)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Feb 02, 2015, 06:07:09 AM
The new trailer was very exciting I'm just not digging some of the dino's looks. Except the raptors, which look absolutely amazing.

It's surreal to know this movie is coming out so soon. Relatively speaking. We'be been waiting for this for more than a decade. Even if it sucks, I know I'll enjoy it a good amount. Can't wait  ;D 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DaddyYautja on Feb 02, 2015, 08:05:49 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Feb 02, 2015, 06:07:09 AM
The new trailer was very exciting I'm just not digging some of the dino's looks. Except the raptors, which look absolutely amazing.

It's surreal to know this movie is coming out so soon. Relatively speaking. We'be been waiting for this for more than a decade. Even if it sucks, I know I'll enjoy it a good amount. Can't wait  ;D

All the dinos seem to be dark greyish colors.
I find that weird, were they like that in the other films? Wasnt there more color on the Dinos?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Feb 02, 2015, 08:35:33 AM
I wasn't especially thrilled by that trailer. I really don't like the idea of domesticated raptors. I mean come on, they were the most dangerous of the lot in the first two films!

Still, the action b-movie buff in me did get a kick out of a dude firing a minigun at a dinosaur. But it was funny rather than cool.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 02, 2015, 08:40:51 AM
SO MANY FEELINGS -- and caps lock is totally warranted. Oh man. This is like my most anticipated film in so many years. Awesome trailer -- loved the Raptors, the stampede, everything. I cannot wait for this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Feb 02, 2015, 08:52:43 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fz5.ifrm.com%2F30263%2F85%2F0%2Fe5307417%2Fe5307417.gif&hash=670416551cda75908cad76cf5448cea761c1198b)

I thought it was awesome too.

Love the look of the I-Rex, which is a welcome original addition, rather than trying to be the new, edgy dinosaur ala Spinosaurus... by literally being created to be that dinosaur. It's funny because it almost seems to be a creature written as a response the the Spinosaurus in JP3, where if you look at the people behind the movie talking about the Spino in the press promos, it sounds almost exactly like the scientists and promos in Jurassic World talking about the I-Rex.

On top of that, the design is awesome, and it embodies in combination both what made the tyrannosaurs and raptors in the first two movies so terrifying, in both speed, agility, cunning, and size.

There just seems to be a lot of love for the novels and the original two films in this, and I'm absolutely loving it.



Also:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FDVWFbvD.png&hash=0abc90ef44ed6cc3cf5c6476d09e90d77be7ee71)

Capcom new DinoCrisis when
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 02, 2015, 08:59:58 AM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Feb 02, 2015, 08:52:43 AM
It's funny because it almost seems to be a creature written as a response the the Spinosaurus in JP3, where if you look at the people behind the movie talking about the Spino in the press promos, it sounds almost exactly like the scientists and promos in Jurassic World talking about the I-Rex.
Ha, so I am not the only one that thought about that. If that's the intention -- priceless!

And yes, I am warming up to the concept of a hybrid dinosaur too. I don't think it was exactly necessary but as it is, they're doing a great job. Also, this trailer pretty much confirms that the models we've seen on the site are 'diluted' and not the ones actually used in the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Feb 02, 2015, 08:59:58 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qf84f8huBko#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qf84f8huBko#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 02, 2015, 09:09:33 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Feb 02, 2015, 08:40:51 AM
SO MANY FEELINGS -- and caps lock is totally warranted. Oh man. This is like my most anticipated film in so many years. Awesome trailer -- loved the Raptors, the stampede, everything. I cannot wait for this.

Yes Omega! YES! :-*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Feb 02, 2015, 09:31:16 AM
I've already been asking my brother if he wants to see it together when it comes out in theaters, just like when we both saw Jurassic Park 3D together on the big screen. It's likely.

I'm hoping that maybe because of Jurassic World that a game developer will be willing to do another Operation Genesis kind of game, a game of which I enjoyed (played for Xbox, also playable for Xbox 360).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRI8heUeWg0# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRI8heUeWg0#)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Feb 02, 2015, 10:00:11 AM
Get it on the PC, you can mod it very easily. But yeah, I'd love another Operation Genesis.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 02, 2015, 10:03:51 AM
They totally should make a new JPOG with updated graphics. I'd play the shit out of it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Feb 02, 2015, 10:25:28 AM
Quote from: MrSpaceJockey on Feb 02, 2015, 05:01:53 AM(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsmellthegrindstone.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F04%2Fjurassic-park-scary.jpg&hash=559a7fac0e3d90c608112099736c3293ef770305)

God damn it Jurassic Park, you are such a dumb movie.

That's why it bothers me. It's like, let's have another scene where glass is stuck between screaming kids and a dinosaur. I really hope this doesn't turn into Predators and goes out of its way to recreate scenes from the original.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 02, 2015, 10:47:39 AM
Quote from: Gilfryd on Feb 02, 2015, 10:25:28 AM
That's why it bothers me. It's like, let's have another scene where glass is stuck between screaming kids and a dinosaur.

I think there is a slight difference.

(https://moviemetropolis.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/jp_explorer.jpg)

(https://halloweenlove.com/images/posts/jurassic-world-gyrosphere.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Feb 02, 2015, 10:52:23 AM
No, I get what he's saying. That shot of the kids was obviously aping the first movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Feb 02, 2015, 11:13:19 AM
After watching the new trailer, I am certified READY for the June release! I just hope the story is above "good" and not too many WTF (as in not good) moments.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Feb 02, 2015, 12:35:47 PM
Alien³, I challenge you to try to not respond to people that aren't entirely convinced with this movie in a droningly sarcastic, overly-defensive, and oddly condescending manner. That includes facetious uses of smiley faces.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 02, 2015, 12:45:08 PM
Quote from: Space Sweeper on Feb 02, 2015, 12:35:47 PM
Alien³, I challenge you to try to not respond to people that aren't entirely convinced with this movie in a droningly sarcastic, overly-defensive, and oddly condescending manner. That includes facetious uses of smiley faces.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reactiongifs.com%2Fr%2Fmog1.gif&hash=1dd3b3ec292ced59db0b8a799a1c49491018b303)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 02, 2015, 12:53:37 PM
Let the sarcasm begin.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Sweeper on Feb 02, 2015, 12:59:23 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWKY2vkSEv8#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWKY2vkSEv8#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Feb 02, 2015, 01:00:36 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Feb 02, 2015, 12:53:37 PM
Let the sarcasm begin.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBNcjvxLfFc# (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBNcjvxLfFc#)

Quote from: Omegazilla on Feb 02, 2015, 10:03:51 AM
They totally should make a new JPOG with updated graphics. I'd play the shit out of it.

They should also let you have access to all of the dinosaurs (you could only pick 5 sites for fossil digging when there was more than 5), and make the islands bigger and more detailed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Feb 02, 2015, 01:04:12 PM
Quote from: DaddyYautja on Feb 02, 2015, 08:05:49 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Feb 02, 2015, 06:07:09 AM
The new trailer was very exciting I'm just not digging some of the dino's looks. Except the raptors, which look absolutely amazing.

It's surreal to know this movie is coming out so soon. Relatively speaking. We'be been waiting for this for more than a decade. Even if it sucks, I know I'll enjoy it a good amount. Can't wait  ;D

All the dinos seem to be dark greyish colors.
I find that weird, were they like that in the other films? Wasnt there more color on the Dinos?

they were all dark grey in the first movie tho, except the Tricy. in the second movie every dino was brown and yellow, in the third they were like a rainbow



btw everyone moaning about the raptors when Dr Grant didnt get killed off in the 3rd movie is reasonable yeah?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 02, 2015, 02:00:45 PM
The dinosaurs have always been different colours right from the outset.

It's all down to how they're lit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Feb 02, 2015, 02:13:19 PM
Quote from: szkoki on Feb 02, 2015, 01:04:12 PMbtw everyone moaning about the raptors when Dr Grant didnt get killed off in the 3rd movie is reasonable yeah?

No, that was also stupid. In fact it's the main reason I'm worried where they're going with domesticated dinos in the fourth.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 02, 2015, 02:22:49 PM
From the writer of the movie.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi61.tinypic.com%2Fkqfj8.png&hash=7b45beb4a5eaf6b7ba1797c0bc26e71e57134c53)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Feb 02, 2015, 02:59:28 PM
I've been betting from the start that when it comes to the raptors "control is an illusion" will come into play.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Feb 02, 2015, 03:11:05 PM
yeah about the raptors anyone saw that Pratt is holding something in his right hand when he is commanding the raptors? probably some kind of a more advanced noise making device like in the 3rd movie. and since he is "petting them, training them" since their birth they are a bit confused about him and about that he can talk to them. just like some animal trainers. but im pretty sure he wont hug them and ride them and so on..



so how will they kill the d-rex?

and what dna is it made of?  rex+spino? rex+raptor? rex+raptor+spino? maybe + human? it said is just as intelligent as a human
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: markweatherill on Feb 02, 2015, 03:27:30 PM
Quote from: szkoki on Feb 02, 2015, 01:04:12 PMa rainbow


I know unicorns are technically not dinosaurs, but hey wouldn't it be fabulous...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Feb 02, 2015, 03:38:03 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Feb 02, 2015, 10:03:51 AM
They totally should make a new JPOG with updated graphics. I'd play the shit out of it.
http://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=50755.0 (http://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=50755.0)

Probably the closest we'll ever get.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Sozin on Feb 02, 2015, 07:59:51 PM
The only part of the trailer I didn't much care for was the... flying dinosaurs (name escapes me at the moment, I'm sorry, Omega). Everything else? Looks pretty friggin awesome. Not necessarily what I would have expected or wanted from a new Jurassic Park film, but for what it is, I can definitely dig it. I like the savagery of the Indominus Rex (f**king love that name) and it's neat that people actually get a chance to fire their weapons at an actual dinosaur for once (looking at you, Grant).

All I need from this film is for the original Rex to come back and deal with the I-Rex and I'll be happy. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Feb 02, 2015, 09:15:45 PM
Yes, finally weapons that work in these JP movies haha.

I loved how the I-Rex had a bloody mouth too, hopefully that means much more violence.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Feb 02, 2015, 09:20:27 PM
Oh the one thing that I found weird was the galloping Stegos. I'm all for the fast dinos, but it just didn't look believable for the Stegosaurs.
Title: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Feb 02, 2015, 09:28:16 PM
I think the idea of controllable raptors could be neat if done correctly, I just don't like the idea of Chris Pratt doing it; it's hard for me to take his character seriously after seeing him portray Starlord from GotG, I see him more as a comedy guy.  I think it would be neat if the guy who commanded the raptors is someone who has deeper emotional issues; for example, this person has difficulty making friends with people so therefore he spends more time with dinosaurs and over time the dinosaurs learn to trust him more than other humans (this kinda reminds me of the bio for the Tracker Predator for the Predators action figure). 

Perhaps as the story progresses, this character will be able to reach out to other humans who need his help, probably the kid from the trailer, and learns to better connect with other people and then chooses to relinquish his pets back into the wild where they belong thus providing a piece of symbolic character development to the plot.  To me, a flawed character who grows within the story sounds like a better idea than "cool action star Pratt is so cool he can control dinosaurs, now watch him kick butt", which sounds pretty shallow, pretentious, and cliché.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 02, 2015, 09:46:40 PM
Our special guest on the next episode ;D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5CrtGs0wSc (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5CrtGs0wSc)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Sozin on Feb 02, 2015, 09:55:14 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Feb 02, 2015, 09:46:40 PM
Our special guest on the next episode ;D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5CrtGs0wSc (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5CrtGs0wSc)
Well, that's just amazing. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 02, 2015, 10:15:00 PM
Slip a Tremors question in there :3

But really, that's great! Looking forward to listening!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 02, 2015, 10:21:48 PM
Tremors will be brought up  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 02, 2015, 10:40:33 PM
MAH MAN 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 02, 2015, 10:50:23 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpcmfjFN8OI (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpcmfjFN8OI)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Feb 02, 2015, 11:24:47 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Feb 02, 2015, 09:46:40 PM
Our special guest on the next episode ;D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5CrtGs0wSc (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5CrtGs0wSc)

Dayum, she aged incredibly well.  :-*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Feb 03, 2015, 12:01:50 AM
She's an incredible artist, too. Looking forward to that, nice one Alien3.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Feb 03, 2015, 12:19:51 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Feb 02, 2015, 09:28:16 PM
I think the idea of controllable raptors could be neat if done correctly, I just don't like the idea of Chris Pratt doing it; it's hard for me to take his character seriously after seeing him portray Starlord from GotG, I see him more as a comedy guy.  I think it would be neat if the guy who commanded the raptors is someone who has deeper emotional issues; for example, this person has difficulty making friends with people so therefore he spends more time with dinosaurs and over time the dinosaurs learn to trust him more than other humans (this kinda reminds me of the bio for the Tracker Predator for the Predators action figure). 

Perhaps as the story progresses, this character will be able to reach out to other humans who need his help, probably the kid from the trailer, and learns to better connect with other people and then chooses to relinquish his pets back into the wild where they belong thus providing a piece of symbolic character development to the plot.  To me, a flawed character who grows within the story sounds like a better idea than "cool action star Pratt is so cool he can control dinosaurs, now watch him kick butt", which sounds pretty shallow, pretentious, and cliché.
As far as we know, he could be that character. He seems to be able to act seriously from the looks of the trailer and he seems like a hard ass, anti social type. Just because he's hunky looking doesn't mean he can't be all that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Feb 03, 2015, 01:12:03 AM
life size indominus figure when
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Feb 03, 2015, 04:33:52 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0KyxXiEqQo#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0KyxXiEqQo#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Feb 03, 2015, 07:13:04 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Feb 03, 2015, 12:19:51 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Feb 02, 2015, 09:28:16 PM
I think the idea of controllable raptors could be neat if done correctly, I just don't like the idea of Chris Pratt doing it; it's hard for me to take his character seriously after seeing him portray Starlord from GotG, I see him more as a comedy guy.  I think it would be neat if the guy who commanded the raptors is someone who has deeper emotional issues; for example, this person has difficulty making friends with people so therefore he spends more time with dinosaurs and over time the dinosaurs learn to trust him more than other humans (this kinda reminds me of the bio for the Tracker Predator for the Predators action figure). 

Perhaps as the story progresses, this character will be able to reach out to other humans who need his help, probably the kid from the trailer, and learns to better connect with other people and then chooses to relinquish his pets back into the wild where they belong thus providing a piece of symbolic character development to the plot.  To me, a flawed character who grows within the story sounds like a better idea than "cool action star Pratt is so cool he can control dinosaurs, now watch him kick butt", which sounds pretty shallow, pretentious, and cliché.
As far as we know, he could be that character. He seems to be able to act seriously from the looks of the trailer and he seems like a hard ass, anti social type. Just because he's hunky looking doesn't mean he can't be all that.

I suppose that's possible, but the scene where he's riding a motorcycle with the raptors seems to imply that the studio is aiming more for "cool" than "deep".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Feb 03, 2015, 08:38:41 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 02, 2015, 10:15:00 PMSlip a Tremors question in there :3

She was in Tremors 3? Never knew that!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Feb 03, 2015, 09:43:48 AM
I have no problem with trained raptors. I hope Pratt rides a raptor into battle for no other reason than because it would be cool as f**k.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Feb 03, 2015, 12:45:26 PM
It would be cinematic gold. Have him on the T-Rex too idgaf.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Feb 03, 2015, 12:46:04 PM
(https://m1.behance.net/rendition/modules/154582057/disp/e22a3090ddee1f8c8457a66962ab2d3b.jpg)

(https://m1.behance.net/rendition/modules/154582069/disp/208b493516b6f01762b7995d141e42ab.jpg)

(https://m1.behance.net/rendition/modules/154582079/disp/44a1198ed18299f5e3957d904c47fef5.jpg)

https://www.behance.net/BarbarianFactory (https://www.behance.net/BarbarianFactory)

Really love these.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Feb 03, 2015, 03:15:16 PM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on Feb 03, 2015, 12:46:04 PM
https://m1.behance.net/rendition/modules/154582057/disp/e22a3090ddee1f8c8457a66962ab2d3b.jpg

https://m1.behance.net/rendition/modules/154582069/disp/208b493516b6f01762b7995d141e42ab.jpg

https://m1.behance.net/rendition/modules/154582079/disp/44a1198ed18299f5e3957d904c47fef5.jpg

https://www.behance.net/BarbarianFactory (https://www.behance.net/BarbarianFactory)

Really love these.
They're so perfect
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 03, 2015, 10:17:37 PM
Is it sad that I can totally tell the author used as reference the first PAPO Tyrannosaurus (for JP), the newer 'Croc' PAPO Tyrannosaurus and the shot of the female approaching Eddie's car (for TLW) and again the PAPO Tyrannosaurus (for JPIII)?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Feb 04, 2015, 08:31:23 AM
PAPO?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 04, 2015, 08:51:48 AM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Feb 04, 2015, 08:31:23 AM
PAPO?
It's a French toy company who has produced some neat Dinosaur figures -- heavily based on the JP designs.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.everythingdinosaur.co.uk%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F09%2Ft_rex_papo_2-295x300.jpg&hash=164d0531635d23a6b603ddcf66c3e65f9a4e4f9f)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Feb 04, 2015, 09:21:33 AM
Ah right, thanks.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr. Forest on Feb 04, 2015, 12:47:46 PM
After learning the T-Rex in the film is the same T-Rex from the first movie, I wish I could change my vote  to "extremely" excited.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Feb 04, 2015, 10:27:06 PM
Quote from: Watchful Guardian on Feb 04, 2015, 12:47:46 PM
After learning the T-Rex in the film is the same T-Rex from the first movie, I wish I could change my vote  to "extremely" excited.
Yea, no shit. Why can't we open up that poll for a re-vote? I'd like to change my not bothered vote to rock-hard-boner.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Feb 04, 2015, 11:43:51 PM
is it the same? really? how come?
Title: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Feb 05, 2015, 12:23:51 AM
It's most likely a plot device to attract fans of the original film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Feb 05, 2015, 12:56:59 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Feb 05, 2015, 12:23:51 AM
It's most likely a plot device to attract fans of the original film.

No, just no
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Feb 05, 2015, 01:04:38 AM
Quote from: MrSpaceJockey on Feb 05, 2015, 12:56:59 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Feb 05, 2015, 12:23:51 AM
It's most likely a plot device to attract fans of the original film.

No, just no
It's plot device alright. A plot to correct that major error that occurred in JPIII. Plus the head raptor will need something to ride into battle with and what better than your very own T-rex? Yee-haw!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Feb 05, 2015, 03:12:09 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Feb 05, 2015, 12:23:51 AM
It's most likely a plot device to attract fans of the original film.
I don't think it's really a plot device. It could be a different Rex and it wouldn't drive the plot differently. We haven't even seen the Rex on both trailers too. Feels more like an easter egg since they're not even promoting this. Maybe that could change in future trailers but even then I doubt they'll flat out say it in then.

As an easter egg it's a pretty cool nod to the fans of the franchise. Nothing wrong with that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Feb 05, 2015, 03:13:06 AM
It's probably just my cynical side talking, but I don't really see how bringing up the connection to the previous film would advance the story in any way.  What's so special about the original Rex that a different Rex couldn't likewise do? ???
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Feb 05, 2015, 03:16:03 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Feb 05, 2015, 03:13:06 AM
It's probably just my cynical side talking, but I don't really see how bringing up the connection to the previous film would advance the story in any way.  What's so special about the original Rex that a different Rex couldn't likewise do? ???
It doesn't advance or take away from the story, so why not? Like I said, it's just a nod to the fans.

Personally, I love the idea of it being the original Rex that comes back to take the crown. Assuming it kills the I-Rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Feb 05, 2015, 03:34:51 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Feb 05, 2015, 03:16:03 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Feb 05, 2015, 03:13:06 AM
It's probably just my cynical side talking, but I don't really see how bringing up the connection to the previous film would advance the story in any way.  What's so special about the original Rex that a different Rex couldn't likewise do? ???
It doesn't advance or take away from the story, so why not? Like I said, it's just a nod to the fans.

Personally, I love the idea of it being the original Rex that comes back to take the crown. Assuming it kills the I-Rex.

That's pretty much what I'm saying, taken at face value it just seems like a cheap marketing ploy designed to target fans of the original.  As a person who has studied the craft of writing, I know that when someone puts something into a story the question should always be "Why this?', not "Why not?" (It's how we got Terminator 3 and 4 :()  I'm not going to judge yet though as I don't know what role the "original Rex" will have in the story, I just hope the movie is more than just special effects and action sequences.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Feb 05, 2015, 03:37:55 AM
But having the original Rex isn't contrived, it actually makes sense. It didn't die at the end of the first film, and Jurassic World is built on Isla Nublar.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Feb 05, 2015, 03:40:37 AM
I played Jurassic Park: The Game from TellTale Games and it's implied in that story (and the novel from which the movie is based) that the entire island got bombed to "preserve the ecosystem".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Feb 05, 2015, 03:52:00 AM
I don't think the Telltale game is considered canon within the film series.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Feb 05, 2015, 03:54:20 AM
Regardless, unless all the dinosaurs from the original film are still on that island then there better be a plot reason why the original t-rex is there, to bring the fact up and then never mention it again is just pandering to fans of the original since it won't change the plot in any way.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Feb 05, 2015, 05:15:29 AM
Why can't they be?  We'll have no idea, because none of the other dinosaurs have distinguishing marks a la the Tyrannosaurus with the Velociraptor scars.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Feb 05, 2015, 05:34:29 AM
Not to mention there was only one T-rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Feb 05, 2015, 08:36:55 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Feb 05, 2015, 03:40:37 AMI played Jurassic Park: The Game from TellTale Games and it's implied in that story (and the novel from which the movie is based) that the entire island got bombed to "preserve the ecosystem".

Yeah, in the novel the Costa Rican air force launch air strikes on the island to kill all the dinosaurs (although a few pterodactyls escape). The film never really says what happened to the park afterwards.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 05, 2015, 09:00:36 AM
Yes, it is very probably a connection that is there purely for the enthusiasts of the original film, those guys that have rewinded that one final scene three thousand times just to watch the T.rex roar again (such as me). I'm not seeing anything wrong with that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Feb 05, 2015, 09:46:05 AM
JW spoiler
Apparently ruined parts of the old park will appear in Jurassic World. The northernmost part of the island is walled off from the new park.
[close]

Remember this (http://i.imgur.com/sELVTe5.jpg) poster? I think it's implied that in JW's continuity, if the island was bombed then they didn't do a particularly good job of it. Rexy may not be the only animal corralled from the old park into the new one (though unless the Dilophosaurus shows up wearing Nedry's glasses, it probably won't matter or be noticeable).


Quote from: HuDaFuK on Feb 05, 2015, 08:36:55 AMYeah, in the novel the Costa Rican air force launch air strikes on the island to kill all the dinosaurs (although a few pterodactyls escape).
The pterosaurs were all trapped in their aviary, everything on Nublar died in the novel. A few dinosaurs had previously escaped to the mainland on boats, but are presumed dead by the second book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Feb 05, 2015, 11:22:22 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Feb 05, 2015, 09:46:05 AMThe pterosaurs were all trapped in their aviary, everything on Nublar died in the novel. A few dinosaurs had previously escaped to the mainland on boats, but are presumed dead by the second book.

You're right, my mistake. It's be a very long time since I read it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Feb 05, 2015, 11:24:36 AM
I still don't get why the Costa Rican government, much less any other would bomb dinos? I think that could be written off as a cover story to appease the general public's fear. The dinos were supposed to die off after 7 days, which of course didn't happen, yet no one bombed site b. In the movies anyway.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Feb 05, 2015, 11:30:20 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Feb 05, 2015, 11:24:36 AMI still don't get why the Costa Rican government, much less any other would bomb dinos? I think that could be written off as a cover story to appease the general public's fear. The dinos were supposed to die off after 7 days, which of course didn't happen, yet no one bombed site b. In the movies anyway.

In the book Hammond is leasing the island from Costa Rica, presumably they're just trying to cover themselves for the fact genetic experiments they allowed to happen on their territory led to the deaths of people.

But as you say, in the movies it's not clear if any of that actually happened.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Feb 05, 2015, 12:47:45 PM
I think the big issue was public health. There was a major concern about communicable disease, and that's what the Costa Rican government saw them as - not dinosaurs, but a major public health risk that they'd allowed to happen by not properly supervising the genetic research of a foreign company on their soil.

It's basically a wider extrapolation (and maybe consequence) of Dodgson's experiment mentioned at the start of the book, in which Chilean farmers are exposed to a virus in order to test a genetically engineered vaccine.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Feb 05, 2015, 02:48:33 PM
Quote from: predxeno on Feb 05, 2015, 03:34:51 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Feb 05, 2015, 03:16:03 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Feb 05, 2015, 03:13:06 AM
It's probably just my cynical side talking, but I don't really see how bringing up the connection to the previous film would advance the story in any way.  What's so special about the original Rex that a different Rex couldn't likewise do? ???
It doesn't advance or take away from the story, so why not? Like I said, it's just a nod to the fans.

Personally, I love the idea of it being the original Rex that comes back to take the crown. Assuming it kills the I-Rex.

That's pretty much what I'm saying, taken at face value it just seems like a cheap marketing ploy designed to target fans of the original.  As a person who has studied the craft of writing, I know that when someone puts something into a story the question should always be "Why this?', not "Why not?" (It's how we got Terminator 3 and 4 :()  I'm not going to judge yet though as I don't know what role the "original Rex" will have in the story, I just hope the movie is more than just special effects and action sequences.
But it doesn't serve as a "marketing ploy." All the fans of the franchise are going to go see this movie anyways. Even if they're wary of the movie because of JP3 or other reasons, most people will go check it out even if it's just to show support to the dinosaur movie genre.

But you know I think it does have a legitimate "why this?" answer. Although it's obvious that this movie is connected to the previous ones, there aren't really any major characters returning to the movie. Except for the Rex now. That's a neat way to make the audience connect to the movie in a more significant way.

Spoiler
Dr. Wu won't really have such an effect.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Feb 05, 2015, 04:49:01 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimageserver.moviepilot.com%2Fjw-2-jurassic-world-trailer-aired-during-superbowl-reveals-insane-new-cgi-effects.gif%3Fwidth%3D660%26amp%3Bheight%3D332&hash=e98243cbeb5b84c9ee4d482c6cded196ef04a454)

improved
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Feb 05, 2015, 04:50:38 PM
So much death, I'm going to love it  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Feb 05, 2015, 05:53:08 PM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Feb 05, 2015, 04:49:01 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimageserver.moviepilot.com%2Fjw-2-jurassic-world-trailer-aired-during-superbowl-reveals-insane-new-cgi-effects.gif%3Fwidth%3D660%26amp%3Bheight%3D332&hash=e98243cbeb5b84c9ee4d482c6cded196ef04a454)

improved

Well, the original shot was plain unfinished.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Feb 05, 2015, 09:32:44 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Feb 05, 2015, 04:50:38 PM
So much death, I'm going to love it  ;D
I think a woman gets plucked by a Pterodactyl. So that's something. I think somebody mentioned they hadn't killed off a woman in any of the JP's lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Feb 05, 2015, 09:38:55 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Feb 05, 2015, 09:32:44 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Feb 05, 2015, 04:50:38 PM
So much death, I'm going to love it  ;D
I think a woman gets plucked by a Pterodactyl. So that's something. I think somebody mentioned they hadn't killed off a woman in any of the JP's lol

Yeah, this movie looks like it's going to fix the small nit picks I had with the previous movies, no guns work against dinos and there aren't enough casualties. Save for the Tall Grass Raptor Attack in TLW, but those were all mainly quick shots of people getting dragged to the ground. I want to see some real casualties here, which is why the shot of the minigun firing at the I-Rex and the flying reptile plucking up that female gets me real excited.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Feb 05, 2015, 10:51:06 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Feb 05, 2015, 11:24:36 AM
I still don't get why the Costa Rican government, much less any other would bomb dinos? I think that could be written off as a cover story to appease the general public's fear. The dinos were supposed to die off after 7 days, which of course didn't happen, yet no one bombed site b. In the movies anyway.

Supposedly, the introduction of a entirely new set of species could damage the present day ecosystem and various food chains would be completely (and possibly irreparably) upended.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Feb 06, 2015, 12:59:28 AM
Megalodon is the best dinosaur of this movie
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dachande on Feb 06, 2015, 01:49:31 AM
Quote from: Crazy Shrimp on Feb 06, 2015, 12:59:28 AM
Megalodon is the best dinosaur of this movie

1. Megalodon isn't even a dinosaur.

2. Nor is it in this movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 06, 2015, 01:53:08 AM
 :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Feb 06, 2015, 06:35:52 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Feb 05, 2015, 10:51:06 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Feb 05, 2015, 11:24:36 AM
I still don't get why the Costa Rican government, much less any other would bomb dinos? I think that could be written off as a cover story to appease the general public's fear. The dinos were supposed to die off after 7 days, which of course didn't happen, yet no one bombed site b. In the movies anyway.

Supposedly, the introduction of a entirely new set of species could damage the present day ecosystem and various food chains would be completely (and possibly irreparably) upended.
Oh no doubt but even in the book the pteranodons got away. So the bombing was half-assed. In fact wouldn't bombing the island cause the dinos to flee... does Costa Rica even have an air force? :P Bombing is a foolish decision. If you're worried about ecosystems and disease, well I think it is too late, pandoras box was already opened.

I would love to see a megalodon. In fact seeing the size of the mosasaur I think they really need to start breeding some megalodons to feed them. The white shark just doesn't look as filling.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Feb 06, 2015, 12:14:33 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Feb 06, 2015, 06:35:52 AM
Oh no doubt but even in the book the pteranodons got away. So the bombing was half-assed. In fact wouldn't bombing the island cause the dinos to flee... does Costa Rica even have an air force? :P

The constitution has forbidden a standing military since 1949.

So no.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Feb 06, 2015, 01:27:46 PM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Feb 06, 2015, 12:14:33 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Feb 06, 2015, 06:35:52 AM
Oh no doubt but even in the book the pteranodons got away. So the bombing was half-assed. In fact wouldn't bombing the island cause the dinos to flee... does Costa Rica even have an air force? :P

The constitution has forbidden a standing military since 1949.

So no.
That's what I thought... :)

Quote from: wikipediaIn case of war in Costa Rica, the United States has offered their military to use at Costa Rica's disposal.

... but of course.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Feb 06, 2015, 01:43:12 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Feb 06, 2015, 01:27:46 PM
Quote from: wikipediaIn case of war in Costa Rica, the United States has offered their military to use at Costa Rica's disposal.

... but of course.  :laugh:



"I would of gotten away with it too if it weren't for you meddling kids!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Feb 06, 2015, 01:53:45 PM
Quote from: wikipediaIn case of war in Costa Rica, the United States has offered their military to use at Costa Rica's disposal.

I'd love to hear that phonecall.

"Err... Mr. Clinton? Yeah... So, we've kinda got some dinosaurs down here..."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Darkblade 25 on Feb 06, 2015, 03:55:28 PM
I am so looking forward to it I like the movies their should be a TV show about it one for kids teens and adults.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Feb 06, 2015, 07:46:27 PM
Here's my 2 cents...

I am excited and look forward to seeing this film. I'm gonna pay the extra money to see this in gallery so my partner and I can have our own booth and have some alcohol and nice food etc. Jurassic Park holds a special place in my life as it brought me some happiness when I lost a family member when I was young. Dinosaurs were always my favourite as a kid, like many others.

My issue is the raptors. I know some people haven't got an issue with it and that's fine. But I showed my friend the trailer today and his reply was "oh...they have raptors on they're side. it's like "come on guys lets go and save the day". The rest looks good though".

That pretty much sums up my thoughts on it too. I hope it's good but it's the way the trailer makes it look that I think is the reason some fans are understandbly worried.

I do think it's going to be a good film but for nastalgic reasons I think they're too far pushed to ever make another film as good as the original. If it comes close though I'll be very happy. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Feb 06, 2015, 08:51:17 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Feb 02, 2015, 02:22:49 PM
From the writer of the movie.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi61.tinypic.com%2Fkqfj8.png&hash=7b45beb4a5eaf6b7ba1797c0bc26e71e57134c53)

for everyone and their good/trained raptor bs
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Feb 06, 2015, 08:57:28 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Feb 06, 2015, 08:51:17 PMfor everyone and their good/trained raptor bs

I still don't buy it. The fact is we see them working with a person in the trailer, as opposed to just eating him. And I don't like that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Feb 06, 2015, 09:00:38 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Feb 06, 2015, 01:53:45 PM
Quote from: wikipediaIn case of war in Costa Rica, the United States has offered their military to use at Costa Rica's disposal.

I'd love to hear that phonecall.

"Err... Mr. Clinton? Yeah... So, we've kinda got some dinosaurs down here..."
"Gramma's? Ew... that's gross." That or... "Tell me about it, I've got one thinking she can be presiDENT!" and then "No wait, you're serious? Do you have a T-Rex?"

Quote from: MudButt on Feb 06, 2015, 08:51:17 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Feb 02, 2015, 02:22:49 PM
From the writer of the movie.



for everyone and their good/trained raptor bs
Yea they're not domesticated. They're just smart enough to know that he is holding a thermal detonator! That and they're having fun being in the 3-ring circus. However the director did say that the raptor end up being the ones that kill everyone.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Feb 06, 2015, 09:14:22 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Feb 06, 2015, 08:57:28 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Feb 06, 2015, 08:51:17 PMfor everyone and their good/trained raptor bs

I still don't buy it. The fact is we see them working with a person in the trailer, as opposed to just eating him. And I don't like that.

I doubt he would lie about it.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn2-www.comingsoon.net%2Fassets%2Fuploads%2Fgallery%2Fjurassic-world-super-bowl-screenshots%2Fjurassic-world-super-bowl-11.jpg&hash=c776ace5693f48c95b37785a318669fd8b9f7e57)

Also, in the image above he appears to be holding something, probably a device that helps keep the raptors from shredding him apart. If they can create their own dino from scratch now they can probably make some type of device to keep these raptors from attacking Pratt.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn3-www.comingsoon.net%2Fassets%2Fuploads%2Fgallery%2Fjurassic-world-super-bowl-screenshots%2Fjurassic-world-super-bowl-13.jpg&hash=30c8986b1a2d1752071d268370c6b0aa71890aee)

And in the above image it doesn't actually look like they're wagging their tails at him, they probably do want to eat him but something is keeping them from doing that (We simply deny them that).

I can be more then sure that before this movie ends these Raptors will turn on him at some point. My guess is that they maybe tag the I-Rex with some sort of device that attracts whatever other device the Raptors have, which could explain that scene where they're charging straight ahead with Pratt on his bike.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Feb 06, 2015, 09:18:58 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Feb 06, 2015, 09:14:22 PMI doubt he would lie about it.

I'm not saying he's lying. "Domesticated" implies they're pets, house-trained not to crap on the carpet, which they clearly aren't. But they are in some way tamed, you can see that in the trailer. And I don't like the idea. The T-Rex may have been the star, but the raptors in the first two films were the biggest threat to the human survivors. So I don't like that they've apparently been diminished somewhat. Just my personal opinion.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Feb 06, 2015, 09:23:18 PM
Well, like I said, they probably came up with a way to ''tame'' then in a way because they've proven time and time again to be smarter then we think they are, which is why I think they created a device to help with the taming. I just think at some point it'll backfire and they'll be freed from this restraint that keeps them from being somewhat controlled and turn on Pratt and Co.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Feb 07, 2015, 11:20:39 PM
Yeah I think the raptors are being coerced. I do think they'll get loose and attack people though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Feb 07, 2015, 11:28:23 PM
"Nature finds a way," right? ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Feb 07, 2015, 11:29:31 PM
I still mourn the fact that Pete Postlethwaite is no longer with us. Tembo is like the only character form TLW I'd want back other than Malcolm.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Feb 07, 2015, 11:31:59 PM
^ Facts.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Feb 08, 2015, 12:08:47 AM
So who think that they would go in that unheard of direction and have the raptors bite off Chris Pratts head? Maybe even slaughter all of the innocent children at the end? You know, something we would consider being way out of left field?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Feb 08, 2015, 12:43:29 AM
Are you suggesting that the raptors have extraordinary midichlorian counts?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: jacc.90 on Feb 08, 2015, 01:50:36 AM
mmm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUQzGnoYVBQ (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUQzGnoYVBQ)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Feb 08, 2015, 02:32:54 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Feb 08, 2015, 12:43:29 AM
Are you suggesting that the raptors have extraordinary midichlorian counts?
Well I wasn't thinking that far out of left field... :P

More so that they would break the taboo of having the raptor turn on the hero and eat him and the park goers and have the dinos take over. Or worse if you have any other ideas?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Feb 08, 2015, 04:23:02 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Feb 08, 2015, 12:08:47 AM
So who think that they would go in that unheard of direction and have the raptors bite off Chris Pratts head? Maybe even slaughter all of the innocent children at the end? You know, something we would consider being way out of left field?

Something that would be way out of left field would be if the raptors started obeying humans and joined a motorcycle gang... oh, wait. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Feb 08, 2015, 04:46:09 AM
it's not out of left field doe cause the raptors were lil bitches anyways. 8) 8) 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Feb 08, 2015, 05:03:48 AM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Feb 08, 2015, 04:46:09 AM
it's not out of left field doe cause the raptors were lil bitches anyways. 8) 8) 8)

You say that while looking at the computer screen, but have you checked your left or right?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Feb 08, 2015, 05:09:01 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-_um4ux3Ff_I%2FTxVwrk7onuI%2FAAAAAAAAAHs%2F51Nf3OLMJDE%2Fs1600%2Fjurassicpark9.PNG&hash=33080c3b3bf486b2f142d2be4161d0fc73df1c20)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Feb 08, 2015, 06:50:51 AM
Quote from: Crazy Rich on Feb 08, 2015, 05:03:48 AM
Quote from: King Rathalos on Feb 08, 2015, 04:46:09 AM
it's not out of left field doe cause the raptors were lil bitches anyways. 8) 8) 8)

You say that while looking at the computer screen, but have you checked your left or right?

???
....
:'( :'( :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Feb 08, 2015, 07:26:09 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Feb 08, 2015, 04:23:02 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Feb 08, 2015, 12:08:47 AM
So who think that they would go in that unheard of direction and have the raptors bite off Chris Pratts head? Maybe even slaughter all of the innocent children at the end? You know, something we would consider being way out of left field?

Something that would be way out of left field would be if the raptors started obeying humans and joined a motorcycle gang... oh, wait. :P
Nah, because that is what we are being led to believe will happen. It would also be too damn cute and awesome. Think of the boost in toys sales.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: King Rathalos on Feb 08, 2015, 07:47:56 AM
Spinoff cartoon where the raptors ride motorcycles and have guns and fight to save the day against evil dinosaur squad of super dinosaur soldiers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Feb 08, 2015, 11:03:23 AM
Probably already penned to paper.

I wonder if they genetically enhance the T-rex... maybe they gave it longer arms so it can box the iRex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Feb 08, 2015, 11:38:02 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Feb 07, 2015, 11:29:31 PMI still mourn the fact that Pete Postlethwaite is no longer with us. Tembo is like the only character form TLW I'd want back other than Malcolm.

This. Loved him in that film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 08, 2015, 11:50:27 AM
Tembo rocks.

Quote from: King Rathalos on Feb 08, 2015, 07:47:56 AM
Spinoff cartoon where the raptors ride motorcycles and have guns and fight to save the day against evil dinosaur squad of super dinosaur soldiers.
Reverse Extreme Dinosaurs then?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naissus on Feb 08, 2015, 01:12:21 PM
The big surprise in the movie is when the genetically created Marlboro Man catches up to Pratt on the his motorcycle.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Feb 08, 2015, 01:17:45 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Feb 08, 2015, 11:50:27 AMTembo rocks.

His exit is my favourite moment in the film (and I really like The Lost World).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Feb 08, 2015, 03:52:34 PM
"You broke that man's jaw for no other reason than own boredom."

Total badass Tembo.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Feb 08, 2015, 09:12:26 PM
JURASSIC WORLD Toys Reveal A New Hybrid Dinosaur

Quote
A safer bet for an actual movie revelation is the names of the three Raptors we see being trained by Chris Pratt's character in the trailers. It seems they'll go by "Charlie", "Echo" and "Delta". "Clever as ever, Jurassic World's velociraptors — Charlie, Delta, and Echo — are masterful hunters. Now, they're teaming up to hunt the ultimate predator!" Not particularly imaginative, but there you go. More images at the link below.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/markcassidycbm/news/?a=114974 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/markcassidycbm/news/?a=114974)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Feb 08, 2015, 09:27:45 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Feb 08, 2015, 09:12:26 PM
JURASSIC WORLD Toys Reveal A New Hybrid Dinosaur

Quote
A safer bet for an actual movie revelation is the names of the three Raptors we see being trained by Chris Pratt's character in the trailers. It seems they'll go by "Charlie", "Echo" and "Delta". "Clever as ever, Jurassic World's velociraptors — Charlie, Delta, and Echo — are masterful hunters. Now, they're teaming up to hunt the ultimate predator!" Not particularly imaginative, but there you go. More images at the link below.

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/markcassidycbm/news/?a=114974 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/markcassidycbm/news/?a=114974)
Spoiler
DoomDroolz :P
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 08, 2015, 09:35:03 PM
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jurassicworld.org%2Fnews%2Fuploads%2FStegoceratops.jpg&hash=32fea561a60ea861f53cc05512617f977cc95854)

This screams the Chaos Effect toyline, albeit less stylized. Can't say I really care for it.
[close]

Anyways, wonder what happened to Raptors Alpha and Beta?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 08, 2015, 10:34:12 PM
Doubt it'll even be in the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 08, 2015, 10:37:02 PM
Yeah, I'm almost sure it won't as well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Feb 08, 2015, 11:11:51 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 08, 2015, 09:35:03 PM
Anyways, wonder what happened to Raptors Alpha and Beta?
They were probably the examples used to keep C, D and E in line. And by example I mean they blew them up in front of the others. Yes obviously they had to do it twice to get it into those silly lizards heads.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Feb 08, 2015, 11:12:42 PM
Obviously Pratt is Alpha.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Feb 08, 2015, 11:13:34 PM
Come to think about it, they're 4 raptors in the trailer, yea pratt must be the beta bitch.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Feb 09, 2015, 01:19:16 AM
Quote from: jacc.90 on Feb 08, 2015, 01:50:36 AM
mmm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUQzGnoYVBQ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUQzGnoYVBQ)
Oh f**k
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: razeak on Feb 09, 2015, 01:25:58 AM
At the very least, the trailer makes it appear it is a step up from JP3.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Feb 11, 2015, 12:57:19 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ryzm9PTxzc#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ryzm9PTxzc#ws)

video on Vincent D'Onofrio's character.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Feb 11, 2015, 06:53:08 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Feb 11, 2015, 12:57:19 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ryzm9PTxzc#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ryzm9PTxzc#ws)

video on Vincent D'Onofrio's character.
The viral marketing for this movie is top notch! in the website it even says that his character helped take down the pteradons from the 3rd movie
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PVTDukeMorrison on Feb 11, 2015, 06:57:03 PM
Jesus, InGen has their own pmc's now?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 11, 2015, 07:08:50 PM
Quote from: frenchfries on Feb 11, 2015, 06:53:08 PM
The viral marketing for this movie is top notch! in the website it even says that his character helped take down the pteradons from the 3rd movie

;) :-*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Feb 11, 2015, 07:10:24 PM
Quote from: frenchfries on Feb 11, 2015, 06:53:08 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Feb 11, 2015, 12:57:19 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ryzm9PTxzc#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ryzm9PTxzc#ws)

video on Vincent D'Onofrio's character.
The viral marketing for this movie is top notch! in the website it even says that his character helped take down the pteradons from the 3rd movie
Wowzas
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Feb 11, 2015, 07:28:59 PM
I dunno, Kingpin running security sounds like it won't end well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 11, 2015, 07:33:10 PM
He'll probably spill some water on the mechanisms.

Water with sugar. Lots of sugar.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Feb 11, 2015, 07:42:38 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Feb 11, 2015, 07:33:10 PM
He'll probably spill some water on the mechanisms.

Water with sugar. Lots of sugar.

Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
(https://kmpunksays.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/vqbch.gif?w=830)
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 11, 2015, 07:59:58 PM
Spoiler
Spoiler
more (https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FxtOkNZK-m4A%2Fhqdefault.jpg&hash=97c07f1f2f8cccd8d05303ab03c37662f54a5b77)
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
more (https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FxtOkNZK-m4A%2Fhqdefault.jpg&hash=97c07f1f2f8cccd8d05303ab03c37662f54a5b77)
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Mmhhmh (https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FxtOkNZK-m4A%2Fhqdefault.jpg&hash=97c07f1f2f8cccd8d05303ab03c37662f54a5b77)
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Sozin on Feb 11, 2015, 08:57:36 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ah2xFRUaOg#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ah2xFRUaOg#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Feb 11, 2015, 09:23:38 PM
Quote from: Laufey on Feb 11, 2015, 08:57:36 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ah2xFRUaOg#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ah2xFRUaOg#ws)
Only thing that made me laugh was the Bieber poster scene lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 11, 2015, 10:02:21 PM
Kiramid, Alien3, I love you guys.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 12, 2015, 10:17:57 AM
You too Omega  :-*

Made a new vlog about whats coming up this year...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZlbIZnBInc (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZlbIZnBInc)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Feb 13, 2015, 03:51:40 PM
Hasbro's Jurassic World Toys including the Indominus Rex:

http://www.comingsoon.net/movies/news/409547-check-out-hasbros-jurassic-world-toys-including-the-indominus-rex#/slide/7 (http://www.comingsoon.net/movies/news/409547-check-out-hasbros-jurassic-world-toys-including-the-indominus-rex#/slide/7)

The Tyrannosaurus looks weird tho...  :-[
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 13, 2015, 04:39:45 PM
They all look horrendous.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Feb 13, 2015, 04:47:58 PM
They looks VERY similar to the Re-Ak At-Ck toys JP3 dished out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Feb 13, 2015, 07:22:10 PM
Is neca making any jw figures?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: darkbladeclan6438 on Feb 13, 2015, 07:29:07 PM
Quote from: frenchfries on Feb 13, 2015, 07:22:10 PM
Is neca making any jw figures?
they said on twitter only hasbro can make jp toys; don't have the license
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Wrecktangle on Feb 14, 2015, 10:32:17 AM
They look weird, but nostalgic as they remind me of the T-Rex toy I had with the removable section. I looooooved Dinosaurs.

I'm not expecting JW to be as good as the original, but I hope it can live up to the name.

Edit: that Stegosaurus/Triceratops thing better not be in there :/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Feb 15, 2015, 02:18:04 AM
Interesting if they have a scene with diver in the water

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.collider.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F02%2Fhasbro-jurassic-world-toys-18.jpg&hash=4f5fed5c56a7e4de9303b54246f414662d21e802)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Feb 15, 2015, 02:32:50 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ogi_Sz3ITUc (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ogi_Sz3ITUc)

What do you guys think of the new Jurassic World arcade game that is being released soon?  It's by the same people who made Aliens: Extermination and Aliens: Armageddon.  Speaking of which, did you guys know the new Aliens arcade game is already out?  I heard nothing about its release from AvPGalaxy besides that it was in production.  Back on topic, what do you guys think of the previous arcade games for the first 3 movies?  I have to say I beat and enjoyed each one of them. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: razeak on Feb 16, 2015, 03:10:53 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Feb 05, 2015, 03:54:20 AM
Regardless, unless all the dinosaurs from the original film are still on that island then there better be a plot reason why the original t-rex is there, to bring the fact up and then never mention it again is just pandering to fans of the original since it won't change the plot in any way.

If the only indication is a few scars, does it really matter?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 16, 2015, 10:00:41 AM
I don't understand why he's fussing about this detail so much. It's a homage for fans, obviously -- so what?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: happypred on Feb 16, 2015, 10:11:58 AM
I guarantee Jurassic World is going to suck donkey balls compared to the original
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on Feb 16, 2015, 11:15:30 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Feb 16, 2015, 10:00:41 AM
I don't understand why he's fussing about this detail so much. It's a homage for fans, obviously -- so what?
Because it's dumb and this is the Internet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 16, 2015, 11:21:34 AM
Why is it dumb? There's nothing especially contradictory or stupid about it -- going by the final cuts of all films.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Feb 16, 2015, 01:27:34 PM
I've already gotten over it by now actually; as I said earlier, good stories ask "why should?" while bad stories ask "why not?".  AVPR asked a LOT of those and that's why you guys hate it if memory serves me correct.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 16, 2015, 01:40:13 PM
Dude, it's a detail. It's like all those connections in the Star Wars films. Nothing that really does affect the story or the logic of it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Feb 16, 2015, 01:44:25 PM
As I said, I've pretty much gotten over it by now, I decided I really don't need to do to JP4 what countless fans do to AVPR, especially if the movie isn't even released yet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 16, 2015, 01:48:12 PM
There is a difference between a detail that has no contradictory or illogical values implied within it and an action or detail that does. The T.rex being the original one from Nublar is nothing influential to the storyline. It's backstory. Decoration.

Why do you keep bringing AvPR up? Its faults are found elsewhere, not in backstory details.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Feb 16, 2015, 01:56:28 PM
I just don't see the point of making a reference like this if it doesn't play an actual part in the story, many movies and games rely on stars or cheap marketing tricks rather than good writing to sell their stories, that's why I was initially very pessimistic and cynical about all this.  Likewise I may ask why we keep bringing this topic back up when I said I've already gotten over the issue. :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 16, 2015, 02:04:52 PM
It adds to the story and provides an emotional connection with the first film. Not that difficult. It's like Sting which appears both in The Hobbit and in The Lord of the Rings.
Title: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Feb 16, 2015, 02:22:42 PM
See it from my point of view, a background detail would be like saying ALL the dinosaurs are from the first film, but if the producers make a very specific point of mentioning that the T-Rex is the same from the movie then it implies that the creature is special in some way.  This builds hype among the fans who believe this special connection must have been added in for a reason.  However, if this detail isn't followed through in the film (or even mentioned) then it sounds less like a background detail to add an "emotional connection" like you said and more like an extra trivia piece added on only after-the-fact. 

When JP5 or JP6 comes out, nobody will even pay attention to this detail and future directors may disregard it entirely when making their films; this is an opening for inconsistencies and contradictions, and what was once a nice little fun fact becomes a flame war with different sides arguing different perspectives.  As someone who literally takes ALL licensed works as canon, you can see why this may be a bigger issue for me than for a more casual fan.  If the producers want to add a detail like this in their film then I'm fine with it, just respect the series enough to tell it with integrity rather than with the intent of sounding cool, the scene of Pratt controlling raptors and leading a motorcycle gang doesn't inspire me with confidence in this regard.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 16, 2015, 03:19:48 PM
You're overthinking things too soon. We know too little of everything to project anything like this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Feb 16, 2015, 04:18:31 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Feb 16, 2015, 02:04:52 PM
It adds to the story and provides an emotional connection with the first film. Not that difficult. It's like Sting which appears both in The Hobbit and in The Lord of the Rings.
Yeah I argued this with him a few pages ago.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Feb 16, 2015, 04:29:33 PM
I hear you, hence I said:

Quote from: predxeno on Feb 16, 2015, 01:44:25 PM
As I said, I've pretty much gotten over it by now, I decided I really don't need to do to JP4 what countless fans do to AVPR, especially if the movie isn't even released yet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Feb 16, 2015, 06:20:49 PM
The JW website's been updated with a pretty cool article on Rexy (http://www.jurassicworld.com/raptor-pass/t-rex-detail/?redirect=false). Sounds like it comes directly from Brian Switek to me (who apparently does now officially advise on the web content).

It also implies there may be subadult rexes at the park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 16, 2015, 08:37:09 PM
They based the scraping thing on the recent Tarbosaurus discoveries I think.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 17, 2015, 08:52:59 AM
They came to the island built a park, found and captured the original Rex (who had been living on the island for 25 years) and now house her in their T-Rex Kingdom attraction.

Why is that a hard pill to swallow?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Feb 17, 2015, 09:09:45 AM
Yeah, I don't get why this is such an issue.

Personally, I find it a little silly purely because it adds nothing of any substance to the film and sounds like a marketing gimmick. But it doesn't do any damage to the film either. It's pretty much irrelevant.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Feb 17, 2015, 09:26:03 AM
Ugh, I was hoping I'd changed the subject.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Feb 17, 2015, 02:45:41 PM
JW sketches by Matt Frank -
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F40.media.tumblr.com%2Fb1932d3431dc16ab938582c93758ddff%2Ftumblr_njwq3xOBhG1rwy72mo1_1280.jpg&hash=02d98654a7f2efe00ee66cadddffcc2d37ae1f3e)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Feb 17, 2015, 02:56:25 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Feb 17, 2015, 09:09:45 AM
Yeah, I don't get why this is such an issue.

Personally, I find it a little silly purely because it adds nothing of any substance to the film and sounds like a marketing gimmick. But it doesn't do any damage to the film either. It's pretty much irrelevant.
It's not a marketing gimmick though. Predxeno refuses to see it another way though. But here's as clear as I can make the distinction be:

The difference between a gimmick and a homage is that a gimmick is made to get you TO the theatre, whereas a homage is meant to cause an emotional or nostalgic response while you're IN the theatre.

They haven't even shown a Rex yet in the commercials, let alone the fact that it's the old one. For somebody to know this fact, you'd have to be a huge fan that actively looks for this information. And those people, like us, are going to go see the movie one way or another. Even if we have our doubts about the movie.

As of now, it can't be classified as a marketing gimmick. I wouldn't even say it was so if they do show the T Rex in a commercial, because that seems mandatory to the franchise.

Now if they flat out focus a trailer on a line that mentions it's the old Rex, then yeah I can't defend it there. But even so, not a big deal. So yes hopefully this argument ends already.

At least until we get a trailer with a damn T Rex  ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Feb 17, 2015, 03:20:03 PM

Quote from: Vertigo on Feb 17, 2015, 09:26:03 AM
Ugh, I was hoping I'd changed the subject.

Ugh, you weren't the only one; everyone here is remarkably obsessed with this issue for some reason.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: markweatherill on Feb 17, 2015, 03:42:44 PM
A while ago I read an Aliens comic that had an alien smoking a cigar and speaking.

Now, this is what they should have done with the raptors in this movie. Perhaps they have!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ryu on Feb 17, 2015, 05:13:22 PM
Quote from: Gilfryd on Feb 17, 2015, 02:45:41 PM
JW sketches by Matt Frank -
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F40.media.tumblr.com%2Fb1932d3431dc16ab938582c93758ddff%2Ftumblr_njwq3xOBhG1rwy72mo1_1280.jpg&hash=02d98654a7f2efe00ee66cadddffcc2d37ae1f3e)
[close]
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc05.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2Ff%2F2010%2F185%2F9%2F8%2FSketchbook_2010_cover_by_KaijuSamurai.jpg&hash=9c8ed987d390767470f7ac551f10a33f1a9dc665)
It is unfortunate that Matt Frank and Chris Mowry, have not made the comics JP.
And truth be told, IDW JP comics, had a bad taste in choosing the screenwriter and especially designers. Taking some covers as Jeff Zornow, but other than that is and was a let down.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Feb 18, 2015, 01:19:09 PM
New trailer leaked. (https://vine.co/v/OUiUz061ZPq)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: severen76 on Feb 18, 2015, 11:11:41 PM
Quote from: TJ Doc on Feb 18, 2015, 01:19:09 PM
New trailer leaked. (https://vine.co/v/OUiUz061ZPq)

Best one yet
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Feb 19, 2015, 02:18:41 AM
that trailer confirmed the dog/Dino hybrids
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Feb 20, 2015, 03:20:48 AM
All my money, I'm going to the midnight showing just because of that trailer!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Feb 23, 2015, 03:26:47 AM
Giganotosaurus and Rugops were dinosaurs from Gondwana.

That being said, what if we put Africa and South America together?

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi113.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fn236%2FMapubeast%2FFPPsEyd.jpg_zpsfensum5v.gif&hash=89f59c11eafdb2aad10b694eb1c73d91b47161de)

We have the Indominus Rex!  lol
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Feb 23, 2015, 10:59:35 AM
:laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 23, 2015, 01:09:35 PM
:laugh: Wonderful!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 23, 2015, 02:57:29 PM
Our interview with Ariana Richards.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lar6vq7LRmU (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lar6vq7LRmU)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 23, 2015, 09:00:57 PM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xfp1/v/t1.0-9/1925318_671249789669924_7742961670182747427_n.jpg?oh=fe9060198f88e70ef45cd6aa580b3676&oe=5594ABE7&__gda__=1431258236_f763f21b0b6e17f1e3a27b9990f8e2cd)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Feb 23, 2015, 09:13:55 PM
I felt a manly tear slide down my cheek when that came up. RIP to that amazing man.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Feb 23, 2015, 09:31:54 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Feb 23, 2015, 09:00:57 PM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xfp1/v/t1.0-9/1925318_671249789669924_7742961670182747427_n.jpg?oh=fe9060198f88e70ef45cd6aa580b3676&oe=5594ABE7&__gda__=1431258236_f763f21b0b6e17f1e3a27b9990f8e2cd)
Him and Giger  :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ryu on Feb 24, 2015, 04:30:53 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5w7CX14dJ0 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5w7CX14dJ0)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 25, 2015, 09:10:51 AM
New intro video to the Masrani site...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEjdPlpBDkw#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEjdPlpBDkw#ws)

www.Masraniglobal.com (http://www.masraniglobal.com)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Feb 26, 2015, 06:25:54 PM
some new photos

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=115869 (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=115869)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 26, 2015, 10:28:21 PM
7 new Dinosaurs added to the site! www.jurassicworld.com/?redirect=false (http://www.jurassicworld.com/?redirect=false) 

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B-zcYsvW8AAVgKV.png:large)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 26, 2015, 10:36:18 PM
Holy shit, morherf**king Suchomimus, hell to the cuttlefish f**k yes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Feb 27, 2015, 01:52:25 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Feb 26, 2015, 10:28:21 PM
7 new Dinosaurs added to the site! www.jurassicworld.com/?redirect=false (http://www.jurassicworld.com/?redirect=false) 

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B-zcYsvW8AAVgKV.png:large)
Oh f**k
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Feb 27, 2015, 08:08:52 AM
You might notice a major upgrade in quality on some of these illustrations, it's because they recently hired the amazingly talented Julius Csotonyi to produce some digital paintings for the site. One of them is apparently an accurate Velociraptor, so I'd imagine that one at least won't make it onto the site.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2015, 10:30:17 AM
Maybe they'll get a cameo in the film and there'll be an explanation as to why the 'main' Raptors look different.

Also, nice. Had no idea Csotonyi was attached to those.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Feb 27, 2015, 01:26:07 PM
It's unlikely his work will make it into the film in any form, sadly. They only hired him late in 2014, when they'd finished filming and were well into post-production.
It's reignited the discussion about the film's (non) use of accurate and colourful dinosaurs in some of the forums I read, because Csotonyi's digital paintings look so much better than the film-translated 3D models elsewhere on the site.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 27, 2015, 01:33:15 PM
Yeah the Suchomimus and Baryonyx are insane. Love them.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Feb 27, 2015, 09:09:37 PM
Yeah the 'new' dinosaurs definitely seem more colorful than ones already introduced, at least on the site. I wonder if the movie will balance that out more.

I don't know if these have already been shared, but I thought they were pretty cool -
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth02.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2FPRE%2Ff%2F2014%2F332%2F7%2Ff%2Fmenor_jp_by_iguana_teteia-d880sfr.png&hash=70b152d6940219c0c4e0d3c150655fc8df24bf11)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc08.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2Ff%2F2013%2F211%2F6%2F5%2Fdinos_by_iguana_teteia-d6fyeg2.png&hash=be3b6e6835ae0b63078521dc5ffa8c236f176c8f)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth09.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2FPRE%2Ff%2F2013%2F217%2F3%2F7%2Fjp_by_iguana_teteia-d6gsjkw.png&hash=f3fa7669cd8c1d084a50f8b46320b1abd7de2dfe)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth07.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2FPRE%2Ff%2F2013%2F217%2F3%2Fb%2Fjp_by_iguana_teteia-d6gtf38.png&hash=27647f014371f42d74da1f5b9a8ed39612f1178f)

I still need to get around to reading the books.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Feb 27, 2015, 10:15:56 PM
A little comic I made today.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc01.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2Fi%2F2015%2F058%2F6%2F3%2Fjurassic_world_by_godzillakuj94-d8jqav0.png&hash=969645fd899b6c1130259d378a86d99fd2b7c20b)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Intrepid-Traveler on Feb 28, 2015, 12:36:49 AM
Quote from: Gilfryd on Feb 27, 2015, 09:09:37 PM
Yeah the 'new' dinosaurs definitely seem more colorful than ones already introduced, at least on the site. I wonder if the movie will balance that out more.

I don't know if these have already been shared, but I thought they were pretty cool -
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth02.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2FPRE%2Ff%2F2014%2F332%2F7%2Ff%2Fmenor_jp_by_iguana_teteia-d880sfr.png&hash=70b152d6940219c0c4e0d3c150655fc8df24bf11)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc08.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2Ff%2F2013%2F211%2F6%2F5%2Fdinos_by_iguana_teteia-d6fyeg2.png&hash=be3b6e6835ae0b63078521dc5ffa8c236f176c8f)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth09.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2FPRE%2Ff%2F2013%2F217%2F3%2F7%2Fjp_by_iguana_teteia-d6gsjkw.png&hash=f3fa7669cd8c1d084a50f8b46320b1abd7de2dfe)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth07.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2FPRE%2Ff%2F2013%2F217%2F3%2Fb%2Fjp_by_iguana_teteia-d6gtf38.png&hash=27647f014371f42d74da1f5b9a8ed39612f1178f)

I still need to get around to reading the books.
[close]

Read the first book instead of watching jurassic world. It shows the menace of the (multiple) velociraptors and the book it much more horrific and scientific. Its one of the reasons why I think having trained velociraptors in the new movie completely destroys the original intention of the series. Really great though, as a fan of the series and dinosaurs in general I loved it.

Maybe also try a book called "raptor red" if your interested in stuff like that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Feb 28, 2015, 01:13:59 AM
Quote from: Intrepid-Traveler on Feb 28, 2015, 12:36:49 AM
Quote from: Gilfryd on Feb 27, 2015, 09:09:37 PM
Yeah the 'new' dinosaurs definitely seem more colorful than ones already introduced, at least on the site. I wonder if the movie will balance that out more.

I don't know if these have already been shared, but I thought they were pretty cool -
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth02.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2FPRE%2Ff%2F2014%2F332%2F7%2Ff%2Fmenor_jp_by_iguana_teteia-d880sfr.png&hash=70b152d6940219c0c4e0d3c150655fc8df24bf11)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc08.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2Ff%2F2013%2F211%2F6%2F5%2Fdinos_by_iguana_teteia-d6fyeg2.png&hash=be3b6e6835ae0b63078521dc5ffa8c236f176c8f)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth09.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2FPRE%2Ff%2F2013%2F217%2F3%2F7%2Fjp_by_iguana_teteia-d6gsjkw.png&hash=f3fa7669cd8c1d084a50f8b46320b1abd7de2dfe)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fth07.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2FPRE%2Ff%2F2013%2F217%2F3%2Fb%2Fjp_by_iguana_teteia-d6gtf38.png&hash=27647f014371f42d74da1f5b9a8ed39612f1178f)

I still need to get around to reading the books.
[close]

Read the first book instead of watching jurassic world. It shows the menace of the (multiple) velociraptors and the book it much more horrific and scientific. Its one of the reasons why I think having trained velociraptors in the new movie completely destroys the original intention of the series. Really great though, as a fan of the series and dinosaurs in general I loved it.

Maybe also try a book called "raptor red" if your interested in stuff like that.
One of the producers said there are no tamed raptors. So I'm pretty sure they're being coerced at least.

And yeah you have to read the book!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HappyAlien on Mar 01, 2015, 04:05:51 AM
I always wondered why Crichton used Velociraptors knowing how small they were when they were similar dinosaurs like Deinonychus which were much bigger. Utah Raptor was discovered too late and was actually a bit bigger than the raptors in the films.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Mar 01, 2015, 04:07:51 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Feb 27, 2015, 01:26:07 PM
It's unlikely his work will make it into the film in any form, sadly. They only hired him late in 2014, when they'd finished filming and were well into post-production.
It's reignited the discussion about the film's (non) use of accurate and colourful dinosaurs in some of the forums I read, because Csotonyi's digital paintings look so much better than the film-translated 3D models elsewhere on the site.

Does that mean Suchomimus, Metriacanthus, etc, won't actually be seen in the movie?  :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Mar 01, 2015, 08:52:34 AM
Probably not, but can't say 100%. Maybe they have them in the film but something prevented them from publishing models for the website.

Quote from: HappyAlien on Mar 01, 2015, 04:05:51 AM
I always wondered why Crichton used Velociraptors knowing how small they were when they were similar dinosaurs like Deinonychus which were much bigger. Utah Raptor was discovered too late and was actually a bit bigger than the raptors in the films.

They're actually supposed to be Achillobator, which was known but not named at the time. Crichton's primary palaeontology source, Gregory Paul, thought several dromaeosaurs should be united under the Velociraptor genus (Deinonychus is actually described as Velociraptor antirrhopus in the book), and I think describes the Achillobator-to-be as a "very large Velociraptor" in Predatory Dinosaurs Of The World.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 01, 2015, 11:46:03 AM
Suchomimus has to be in the damn movie -- otherwise everyone at Universal dies.



Quote from: Aspie on Jun 21, 2013, 07:01:15 PM
lol, R.I.P. Jurassic Park 4. You never had a chance.
LOL
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 01, 2015, 03:37:19 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Mar 01, 2015, 11:46:03 AM
Quote from: Aspie on Jun 21, 2013, 07:01:15 PM
lol, R.I.P. Jurassic Park 4. You never had a chance.
LOL

:D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 02, 2015, 02:38:30 AM
Only dat Aspie. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Mar 02, 2015, 03:14:51 PM
It looks he has abandoned this forum for the other one ShadowPred created. The lack of his presence in the SHIELD thread is greatly appreciated.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 06, 2015, 01:28:52 PM
Just finished this nugget...

(https://41.media.tumblr.com/aeb547f655038ae33221521a32be0778/tumblr_nkslb1BO8i1rxp2lko2_r1_1280.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Mar 06, 2015, 03:11:28 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 06, 2015, 01:28:52 PM
Just finished this nugget...

(https://41.media.tumblr.com/aeb547f655038ae33221521a32be0778/tumblr_nkslb1BO8i1rxp2lko2_r1_1280.jpg)
That's fantastic  :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Mar 06, 2015, 05:17:21 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 06, 2015, 01:28:52 PM
Just finished this nugget...

(https://41.media.tumblr.com/aeb547f655038ae33221521a32be0778/tumblr_nkslb1BO8i1rxp2lko2_r1_1280.jpg)

A scene from the movie perhaps?  ::)

That's amazing though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 06, 2015, 07:48:45 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 06, 2015, 01:28:52 PM
Just finished this nugget...

(https://41.media.tumblr.com/aeb547f655038ae33221521a32be0778/tumblr_nkslb1BO8i1rxp2lko2_r1_1280.jpg)
Holy shit, this is amazing. This is the one scene that the film really did miss out on. Guess they didn't put it in for practical reasons.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Sozin on Mar 06, 2015, 11:37:35 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 06, 2015, 01:28:52 PM
Just finished this nugget...

(https://41.media.tumblr.com/aeb547f655038ae33221521a32be0778/tumblr_nkslb1BO8i1rxp2lko2_r1_1280.jpg)

Outstanding. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 06, 2015, 11:50:29 PM
Cheers guys! ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Mar 07, 2015, 03:30:27 AM
Aye, excellent work.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 07, 2015, 03:52:12 AM
A Dino sized awesome to Jack's artwork! What medium is it?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Mar 07, 2015, 06:02:56 PM
What this ever shared? I know a series set has been released but this has an extra slot for JW -
(https://41.media.tumblr.com/0e0d72656c3b15d74efbbfdc59736762/tumblr_njzxh0BIuZ1rsiohpo1_1280.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Mar 07, 2015, 10:18:52 PM
What are those ancient devices? DVD's?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Mar 07, 2015, 11:39:41 PM
Quote from: Gilfryd on Mar 07, 2015, 06:02:56 PM
What this ever shared? I know a set was released before this has got a slot for JW -
(https://41.media.tumblr.com/0e0d72656c3b15d74efbbfdc59736762/tumblr_njzxh0BIuZ1rsiohpo1_1280.jpg)
Dammit I already have my Ultimate Trilogy Blu Rays.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DaddyYautja on Mar 08, 2015, 10:18:11 AM
Quote from: HappyAlien on Mar 01, 2015, 04:05:51 AM
I always wondered why Crichton used Velociraptors knowing how small they were when they were similar dinosaurs like Deinonychus which were much bigger. Utah Raptor was discovered too late and was actually a bit bigger than the raptors in the films.

Cause Raptor is easier to write down and read than Deinonychus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Mar 14, 2015, 05:52:22 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FKofn6Av.jpg&hash=ee15bbabb2e809a7af172cc7065bb0c9a5151e84)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 14, 2015, 07:02:57 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 07, 2015, 03:52:12 AM
A Dino sized awesome to Jack's artwork! What medium is it?

Many different brushes and textures on ye olde photoshop.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 14, 2015, 09:02:54 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 14, 2015, 07:02:57 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 07, 2015, 03:52:12 AM
A Dino sized awesome to Jack's artwork! What medium is it?

Many different brushes and textures on ye olde photoshop.
Well done sir! Looks dino-riffic!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DarthJoker45 on Mar 16, 2015, 01:25:23 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPpFdyEioGs#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPpFdyEioGs#ws)

Source: comingsoon.net (http://www.comingsoon.net/games/trailers/419899-the-full-trailer-for-lego-jurassic-world-is-here)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 16, 2015, 02:20:02 PM
THREE MORE MONTHS!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Mar 16, 2015, 02:40:32 PM
I haven't bought a Lego game for a while but I'm probably going to pick that one up. They're always great fun to play!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Mar 16, 2015, 08:19:58 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Mar 16, 2015, 02:40:32 PM
I haven't bought a Lego game for a while but I'm probably going to pick that one up. They're always great fun to play!
Yeah I haven't bought a Lego game since the Star Wars ones on PS2 but I'm definitely picking this one up!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Mar 16, 2015, 08:24:29 PM
Yeah, this looks great. "Clever girl." :laugh: Also, Lego Jeff Goldblum. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Darkness on Mar 16, 2015, 08:58:25 PM
Never played a LEGO game before but this is the first one that actually interests me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Mar 24, 2015, 01:30:14 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FQ6M2IEI.jpg&hash=2d838648e3a270708e1a05bd03d4b846cebb80d1)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Mar 27, 2015, 11:31:51 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F5KbQJEj.jpg&hash=29f92bc9bf26eb74bfac24a7f4b6c0b356f35ad5)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 29, 2015, 02:57:05 AM
I had something in my mind over the past few years and finally connected the dots. This picture on Dennis Nedry's (other) computer, is it the actual passcode that Ray Arnold could have used to "Access Main Program Grid" ?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.stack.imgur.com%2FClvOi.jpg&hash=4181585eadb41730c6f99beafdda8d0315e550df)

So, could the passcode would be boom1946? mushboom1946?

Thoughts everyone?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 29, 2015, 11:19:38 AM
Maybe...

There is obviously some reason for those particular images.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Mar 29, 2015, 08:50:22 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 29, 2015, 11:19:38 AM
Maybe...

There is obviously some reason for those particular images.
I thought it was just an apocalyptic message, the whole man creates dino thing.

Mixing dino and frog dna actually ended up being a disaster after all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Mar 30, 2015, 01:12:16 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yaWuNjHH2xA#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yaWuNjHH2xA#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Mar 30, 2015, 04:50:49 AM
Alright, from those 2 seconds of iREX footage... that dinosaur looks freaking awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Mar 30, 2015, 11:00:18 AM
this I-Rex just needs a big hug
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 03, 2015, 01:25:32 PM
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOuWeOkMrq84u5LY6apWQ8Q (http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOuWeOkMrq84u5LY6apWQ8Q)

A cool channel with some science, dinosaurs, and Jurassic Park-related stuff. Check it out!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 04, 2015, 08:54:17 AM
Been watching a few of his videos for weeks now. Some interesting ones, some misguided ones.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on Apr 05, 2015, 01:01:54 AM
Got my Indominus Rex today :D

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpt1/v/t34.0-12/11120948_813568995395805_173262361_n.jpg?oh=d2961268ed3e646b22a223da3f4a07a6&oe=5523BE09&__gda__=1428359320_8a5f20df1845a05bfedcad1febcee64c)

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpt1/v/t34.0-12/11130668_813508908735147_1951332481_n.jpg?oh=1b7dd8f4defee7a3f2325e908687e2a9&oe=5522ED7E&__gda__=1428331533_10060c087e82548095cc6b3f117ced54)

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpf1/v/t34.0-12/11082742_813569018729136_1691201091_n.jpg?oh=75a794fc54d73b6f678d7377b5ac31eb&oe=552289C2&__gda__=1428328850_f425b755080b340c15a0473e0224b34e)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 05, 2015, 07:03:19 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CB1mSHyUoAAkluE.png:large)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 05, 2015, 08:33:31 PM
Someone scanned the QR code on that egg and revealed...

Spoiler
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CB2fgJsUEAAwJnI.jpg)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Apr 06, 2015, 12:45:22 AM
Cool cool. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SizzyBubbles on Apr 06, 2015, 04:08:53 AM
Quote from: Snowdog on Apr 05, 2015, 01:01:54 AM
Got my Indominus Rex today :D

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpt1/v/t34.0-12/11120948_813568995395805_173262361_n.jpg?oh=d2961268ed3e646b22a223da3f4a07a6&oe=5523BE09&__gda__=1428359320_8a5f20df1845a05bfedcad1febcee64c)

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpt1/v/t34.0-12/11130668_813508908735147_1951332481_n.jpg?oh=1b7dd8f4defee7a3f2325e908687e2a9&oe=5522ED7E&__gda__=1428331533_10060c087e82548095cc6b3f117ced54)

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpf1/v/t34.0-12/11082742_813569018729136_1691201091_n.jpg?oh=75a794fc54d73b6f678d7377b5ac31eb&oe=552289C2&__gda__=1428328850_f425b755080b340c15a0473e0224b34e)

OOOOOoooooooooooohhhhhHHH... So jealous of you right now Snowdog. I'm gonna have to really start keeping an eye out!
(nice old TLW spino by the way)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 06, 2015, 03:22:12 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 05, 2015, 08:33:31 PM
Someone scanned the QR code on that egg and revealed...

Spoiler
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CB2fgJsUEAAwJnI.jpg)
[close]

"..God destroys dinosaurs. God creates man. Man destroys God. Man creates dinosaurs. Dinosaurs eat man."

"Women inherit the earth."  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 06, 2015, 09:54:48 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CB8D8WPUsAATgmI.png:large)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 06, 2015, 10:54:19 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CB7R20MUEAAIHue.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Apr 07, 2015, 07:31:50 AM
No John Williams? :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 07, 2015, 10:03:35 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 06, 2015, 10:54:19 PM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CB7R20MUEAAIHue.jpg
COMPOSED BY MICHAEL GIACCHINO

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg1.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20121112174030%2Fglee%2Fimages%2F7%2F7b%2FHappy_dance.gif&hash=f64717af10e7be65bb29a5e469e0620a5267ec82)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Apr 07, 2015, 06:05:41 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Apr 07, 2015, 07:31:50 AM
No John Williams? :(
Hes working on star wars
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on Apr 07, 2015, 07:36:06 PM
Here is a little soundtrack teaser :D  :o
It actually sounds really cool

https://instagram.com/p/1LwadtFdpx/ (https://instagram.com/p/1LwadtFdpx/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: StrangeShape on Apr 07, 2015, 09:52:13 PM
I love, just LOVE the first Jurassic Park, its amazing the music, the characters, the vibe, the action, the cinematography, the designs, I liked TLW and hated JP III. JW just doesnt interest me at all, no Williams, No Crichton, no Koepp, no Spielberg, its just JP by name . JP II at least had the same characters we grew up with
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gazz on Apr 07, 2015, 10:07:52 PM
Quote from: StrangeShape on Apr 07, 2015, 09:52:13 PM
no Koepp,

You say that like it's a bad thing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 07, 2015, 10:14:43 PM
Quote from: Gazz on Apr 07, 2015, 10:07:52 PM
Quote from: StrangeShape on Apr 07, 2015, 09:52:13 PM
no Koepp,

You say that like it's a bad thing.

Yeah, Koepp's the guy who took writing advice from a nine-year-old for TLW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DarthJoker45 on Apr 07, 2015, 10:45:01 PM
New footage will debut tomorrow at 11 p.m. EST for the film, and a new picture of the raptor squad has been released! (http://www.jurassicworldnews.com/news/new-look-at-jurassic-world-raptor-squad--new-jurassic-world-footage-debuting-tomorrow-night)

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xap1/v/t1.0-9/11138527_911214545589724_3668872755418042758_n.jpg?oh=3dc44899e6bba3dd2e5097bd5692ad73&oe=55A4FB85&__gda__=1437478489_14b8692a3ce28916e2d625d7c2b8d83f)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Apr 07, 2015, 10:56:44 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on Apr 07, 2015, 07:36:06 PM
Here is a little soundtrack teaser :D  :o
It actually sounds really cool

https://instagram.com/p/1LwadtFdpx/ (https://instagram.com/p/1LwadtFdpx/)
I will agree.

Quote from: DarthJoker45 on Apr 07, 2015, 10:45:01 PM
New footage will debut at 11 p.m. EST for the film, and a new picture of the raptor squad has been released! (http://www.jurassicworldnews.com/news/new-look-at-jurassic-world-raptor-squad--new-jurassic-world-footage-debuting-tomorrow-night)

https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xap1/v/t1.0-9/11138527_911214545589724_3668872755418042758_n.jpg?oh=3dc44899e6bba3dd2e5097bd5692ad73&oe=55A4FB85&__gda__=1437478489_14b8692a3ce28916e2d625d7c2b8d83f
For some reason, that picture reminds me of my pet peacock very angry...  ???  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 07, 2015, 10:58:14 PM
Quote from: DarthJoker45 on Apr 07, 2015, 10:45:01 PM
New footage will debut tomorrow at 11 p.m. EST for the film, and a new picture of the raptor squad has been released! (http://www.jurassicworldnews.com/news/new-look-at-jurassic-world-raptor-squad--new-jurassic-world-footage-debuting-tomorrow-night)

https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xap1/v/t1.0-9/11138527_911214545589724_3668872755418042758_n.jpg?oh=3dc44899e6bba3dd2e5097bd5692ad73&oe=55A4FB85&__gda__=1437478489_14b8692a3ce28916e2d625d7c2b8d83f

Ah time for a new set perhaps.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Apr 08, 2015, 07:27:43 AM
Terms like 'raptor squad' really make me suspect I will hate what they've done with them in the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Apr 08, 2015, 08:28:33 AM
I dunno...there's just something awesome about Chris Pratt riding a motobike surrounded by Raptors.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 08, 2015, 12:16:02 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Apr 08, 2015, 07:27:43 AM
Terms like 'raptor squad' really make me suspect I will hate what they've done with them in the film.
I'm sure it's just for toys and stuff.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Apr 08, 2015, 12:46:01 PM
every intelligent animal can be trained
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Apr 08, 2015, 01:03:08 PM
Quote from: szkoki on Apr 08, 2015, 12:46:01 PMevery intelligent animal can be trained

Not if they're busy hunting you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 08, 2015, 06:09:10 PM
When they're just born, they aren't.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Apr 08, 2015, 06:11:11 PM
Would an infant polar bear not instinctively attack a person?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 08, 2015, 06:12:09 PM
That's why a load of polar bears are fine with trainers, surely?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Apr 08, 2015, 06:32:46 PM
Many intelligent predatory animals have been trained and even integrated into human families.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Apr 08, 2015, 06:46:57 PM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Apr 08, 2015, 06:32:46 PMMany intelligent predatory animals have been trained and even integrated into human families.

Including polar bears and crocodiles? They're about the only one's that actively prey on humans for food.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 08, 2015, 07:18:01 PM
I've certainly seen people keep pet alligators around the house, though I'm not sure if any genuine bonding had happened or if the gators were just plain well-fed and aware that the human didn't pose a threat.

But you can certainly rear pretty much any mammal and many birds to treat a human as a family member. The important thing is to hand-raise them from a VERY young age, minimise contact with their own species, and maintain the relationship every few days at least (ideally daily). You alternate between being a parent and sibling figure.

Things get trickier with social animals (like the raptors, or in the real world, lions and wolves) which need to maintain a group hierarchy and might see the human as a rival if he or she isn't incredibly careful.
There's also the constant problem that a large animal can main or kill you without intending or even trying. Rhino calves love to charge around the place indiscriminately, putting you in real danger once they're heavier than you are. Big cats smack each other around just to play or even as a display of affection. Wolves and hyenas are constantly biting each other as standard social behaviour. If an adult bear sits on you then you're in trouble. Some male animals become uncontrollably aggressive when they're horny. Then there's the issue that any animal can lash out unpredictably if it's sick, injured or pregnant.

So you can form a perfect bond with a large animal and still be in mortal danger every time you interact with it. That's why it's not commonly done - but it's definitely possible, at least in species with highly developed child rearing behaviour.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 08, 2015, 07:58:58 PM
All of that, not to mention that further studies are being done nowadays on reptilian cognition and intelligence -- and it's showing that reptiles (of all orders) are actually smarter than they have been commonly assumed to be in the past centuries, simply because they react differently to certain stimuli when compared to mammals.

Raptors, even the JP Raptors, are animals, not movie villains.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 08, 2015, 10:56:08 PM
Yeah, my understanding is that reptile intelligence is affected by their body temperature (I suppose ours is too, though in our case it would be because we'd be dead). The vast majority of studies were performed at room temperature, which is well below their optimal level. It's just been recently that they've started routinely studying them under hot lamps, and as you say, discovering they're capable of a lot more than we realised.

That said, I don't know about emotional intelligence. In my admittedly limited experience, I've never seen firm evidence of it in reptiles, and very rarely in birds. Interesting to note though that the birds I've seen the best evidence of it in (hornbills and parrots) seem to have evolved it separately.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DarthJoker45 on Apr 09, 2015, 03:13:12 AM
Here is the new clip.

http://www.mtv.com/videos/movies/1183937/jurassic-world-exclusive-theyre-alive.jhtml#id=1735070 (http://www.mtv.com/videos/movies/1183937/jurassic-world-exclusive-theyre-alive.jhtml#id=1735070)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 09, 2015, 03:18:12 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EY4qZO4vC4#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EY4qZO4vC4#ws)

Well that was different than I expected.  I guess there will be more comedy, especially from Pratt's character.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RidgeTop on Apr 09, 2015, 04:05:47 AM
Not quite sure that was the best choice for a first clip reveal.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 09, 2015, 04:09:53 AM
Quote from: RidgeTop on Apr 09, 2015, 04:05:47 AM
Not quite sure that was the best choice for a first clip reveal.

Yeah wasn't too high on BDH's acting in that clip.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Apr 09, 2015, 04:42:39 AM
Well the raptor explanation worked for me. Glad there was some comedy involved in Pratt's character. Can't wait for the movie !
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 09, 2015, 05:28:57 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Apr 09, 2015, 04:09:53 AM
Quote from: RidgeTop on Apr 09, 2015, 04:05:47 AM
Not quite sure that was the best choice for a first clip reveal.

Yeah wasn't too high on BDH's acting in that clip.
Yeah but aside from that, I really enjoyed the banter. It wasn't something I expected from this movie or even the characters. But I think it fits well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Apr 09, 2015, 06:43:29 AM
So that bimbo is a "scientist" eh... and was that Cap'n Kirk or Starlord? or maybe a little-bit of both?

That scene was fairly horrible but I'm still hyped to see this movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Apr 09, 2015, 10:48:52 AM
Quote from: MudButt on Apr 09, 2015, 04:42:39 AM
Well the raptor explanation worked for me. Glad there was some comedy involved in Pratt's character. Can't wait for the movie !

Indeed. Works perfectly fine for me. Also - I don't think it'd be Pratt without some humour involved. Really looking forward to this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Apr 09, 2015, 12:33:41 PM
Good clip. I like Pratt's character already. Grant Malcolm Muldoon all the way.

BDH's character needed to be more steely I think. She was sort of acting like a bashful teenager. If she is in charge of this thing she needs to be more of a cast iron bitch I think. One that sort of lets that veneer drop as the film goes on.

Oh well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Apr 09, 2015, 12:52:26 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Apr 08, 2015, 01:03:08 PM
Quote from: szkoki on Apr 08, 2015, 12:46:01 PMevery intelligent animal can be trained

Not if they're busy hunting you.

dolphins, whales, apes, tigers, lions, crocos, bears, snakes, sharks all are trained by man, why would be an intelligent dinosaurs any different? cmon, think outside the box. but somehow i think in your head its all like Pratt is kissing and hugging raptors all day long
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Apr 09, 2015, 12:59:47 PM
Quote from: szkoki on Apr 09, 2015, 12:52:26 PMdolphins, whales, apes, tigers, lions, crocos, bears, snakes, sharks all are trained by man, why would be an intelligent dinosaurs any different?

None of which, with the possible exception of crocs, are actually predators of man. Occasionally eating a person is very different from actively hunting them.

Quote from: szkoki on Apr 09, 2015, 12:52:26 PMbut somehow i think in your head its all like Pratt is kissing and hugging raptors all day long

No, in my head I hate the idea of the most lethal creature in the previous films being reduced to a performing monkey under human control.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 09, 2015, 01:51:27 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Apr 09, 2015, 12:59:47 PM
Quote from: szkoki on Apr 09, 2015, 12:52:26 PMdolphins, whales, apes, tigers, lions, crocos, bears, snakes, sharks all are trained by man, why would be an intelligent dinosaurs any different?

None of which, with the possible exception of crocs, are actually predators of man. Occasionally eating a person is very different from actively hunting them.

Quote from: szkoki on Apr 09, 2015, 12:52:26 PMbut somehow i think in your head its all like Pratt is kissing and hugging raptors all day long

No, in my head I hate the idea of the most lethal creature in the previous films being reduced to a performing monkey under human control.
It doesn't make that much of a difference if it specifically eats/hunts man or not. They are still predatory animals. Maybe raptors are more inclined to attack humans because they're about the same size, but they are still animals. And smart ones at that. It's not hard to believe they can be controlled to a certain degree. I may be wrong but I get the feeling you still see them as movie monsters and not animals.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Apr 09, 2015, 02:02:10 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Apr 09, 2015, 01:51:27 PMIt doesn't make that much of a difference if it specifically eats/hunts man or not.

It really does. Ask any biologist. An animal occasionally attacking people is very different to a species that actively hunts humans. There are very few species on Earth (like, two) that actually do the latter.

But like I said, more than anything I dislike the concept of essentially reducing them to pets.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Apr 09, 2015, 02:16:10 PM
dinosaur actively hunts human?
look i get your point as you wrote that u want to see them as threats ...again, personally i think its a refreshing idea instead of see them as dumb killing machines, we will see how it goes tho

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 09, 2015, 02:19:10 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Apr 09, 2015, 12:33:41 PM
BDH's character needed to be more steely I think. She was sort of acting like a bashful teenager. If she is in charge of this thing she needs to be more of a cast iron bitch I think. One that sort of lets that veneer drop as the film goes on.

Oh well.

Isn't BDH acting that way because Owen is a past date? Her professional persona drops around him.

I love everything about the clip. It resonates JP perfectly.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Scree on Apr 09, 2015, 02:31:03 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Apr 09, 2015, 03:18:12 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EY4qZO4vC4#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EY4qZO4vC4#ws)

Well that was different than I expected.  I guess there will be more comedy, especially from Pratt's character.

Great Jurassic Park 4 clip. Dialogue about sex and relationships and bad, cartoony acting. Awesome! Who cares about the dinosaurs?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Apr 09, 2015, 02:31:28 PM
Quote from: szkoki on Apr 09, 2015, 02:16:10 PM
dinosaur actively hunts human?
look i get your point as you wrote that u want to see them as threats ...again, personally i think its a refreshing idea instead of see them as dumb killing machines, we will see how it goes tho

I don't think you can say they were ever portrayed as dumb killing machines. They were always quite intelligent which is the allure IMHO. I see where HuDa is coming from - but I just think the cool factor over weighs it for me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Apr 09, 2015, 02:33:15 PM
Quote from: szkoki on Apr 09, 2015, 02:16:10 PMdinosaur actively hunts human?

According to the first two films they do.

Quote from: szkoki on Apr 09, 2015, 02:16:10 PMagain, personally i think its a refreshing idea instead of see them as dumb killing machines, we will see how it goes tho

Just because something can't be controlled, that doesn't automatically make it a dumb killing machine. It's still eminently possible for them to be an intelligent threat.

Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Apr 09, 2015, 02:31:28 PMI see where HuDa is coming from - but I just think the cool factor over weighs it for me.

Yeah, it's not gonna stop me going to see the film. I'm just dubious about how it'll go down for me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Apr 09, 2015, 03:46:41 PM
I hope to see the Raptors betray their trainer. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Apr 09, 2015, 03:59:10 PM
I just like how he said it isn't control, but a mutual respect, probably from working with them since they were born. However, it also means at any point they can turn. Which I think we might see. Would make for some pretty deep emotional stuff if he had to put a raptor down.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Apr 09, 2015, 06:54:06 PM
i really liked the clip! you can really feel the history between them. they well the scene was filmed and shot was great too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Apr 09, 2015, 07:35:12 PM
I think it was a well put together scene.  And I don't mind them holding back dinosaur action.  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Apr 09, 2015, 09:40:39 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 09, 2015, 02:19:10 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Apr 09, 2015, 12:33:41 PM
BDH's character needed to be more steely I think. She was sort of acting like a bashful teenager. If she is in charge of this thing she needs to be more of a cast iron bitch I think. One that sort of lets that veneer drop as the film goes on.

Oh well.

Isn't BDH acting that way because Owen is a past date? Her professional persona drops around him.

I love everything about the clip. It resonates JP perfectly.

That's good enough for one of my scripts. ;) And seriously, yes, it 'feels' Jurassic Parky all the way.

They have to keep it light, and fun I suppose. If she agreed to go out on a date with him before there must be that mutual attraction and she clearly isn't opposed to dating outside of her pay grade. Looking forward to this.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 09, 2015, 11:24:47 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fn1l9UFN.jpg&hash=3193a87eebca1987f16c46bde5c2e1a9456bbcf8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 10, 2015, 12:19:36 AM
Speaking of JW merch, my dealer is being kind enough to get me in on a pre-order for a whole box filled with the entire first line of Jurassic World toys 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Apr 10, 2015, 01:08:46 AM
Quote from: MudButt on Apr 09, 2015, 03:59:10 PM
I just like how he said it isn't control, but a mutual respect, probably from working with them since they were born. However, it also means at any point they can turn. Which I think we might see. Would make for some pretty deep emotional stuff if he had to put a raptor down.

I think they very well could turn, especially a possibility when shit hits the fan.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 10, 2015, 01:17:04 AM
Quote from: MudButt on Apr 09, 2015, 03:59:10 PM
I just like how he said it isn't control, but a mutual respect, probably from working with them since they were born. However, it also means at any point they can turn. Which I think we might see. Would make for some pretty deep emotional stuff if he had to put a raptor down.
Yeah I've been thinking that's how it will go down.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Apr 10, 2015, 01:54:37 AM
that clip also reminded me of idiana jones
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Apr 10, 2015, 07:31:53 AM
Quote from: MudButt on Apr 09, 2015, 03:59:10 PM
I just like how he said it isn't control, but a mutual respect, probably from working with them since they were born. However, it also means at any point they can turn. Which I think we might see. Would make for some pretty deep emotional stuff if he had to put a raptor down.

Completely agree. On all points in this post. They're going out there way to show the Raptors aren't just some trained lapdogs and I like that. It keeps that threat and danger there which I think is quite vital.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Apr 10, 2015, 07:05:35 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs16.postimg.org%2Fg1tx394zp%2F11114142_1653979938154908_6066148839212837039_o.jpg&hash=11f24daf52c615b103e0591f9245dd53ec0b479d)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Apr 10, 2015, 10:13:47 PM
I really need to visit Hawaii one day.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Apr 11, 2015, 05:48:53 PM
i still cant get over the fact that there will be no brachiosaurus
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 11, 2015, 06:57:16 PM
Can someone kindly tell Joss Whedon to go f**k himself? One clip he isolates from a two-hour movie and he's bitching about sexism. Pfft. The guy is a great writer but he's a whiner.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on Apr 11, 2015, 08:22:34 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 11, 2015, 06:57:16 PM
Can someone kindly tell Joss Whedon to go f**k himself? One clip he isolates from a two-hour movie and he's bitching about sexism. Pfft. The guy is a great writer but he's a whiner.

The guy is whining all the time. I do love his work but i kind of really dislike him as a person. Also really low to attack a movie based on a 1 minute clip that doesn't even have anything to do with sexism. Thats the problem with today. All those so called world improvers/fixers.... They whine and label everything not realising that they are part of the problem.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 11, 2015, 08:43:01 PM
He's a professional white knight. If we're being honest about things.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Apr 11, 2015, 10:43:06 PM
... anyways.
Did anyone else see the mobile game they made? Basically Jurassic park builder on crack, it's cool.
If all those dinos are at least mentioned in the game it'll be amazing how much diversity they have. Plus they actually have a utahraptor and a velociraptor, the former looking feathery and the latter looking how it did in the movies.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on Apr 11, 2015, 11:20:03 PM
Quote from: Cap. Fitzgerald on Apr 11, 2015, 10:43:06 PM
... anyways.
Did anyone else see the mobile game they made? Basically Jurassic park builder on crack, it's cool.
If all those dinos are at least mentioned in the game it'll be amazing how much diversity they have. Plus they actually have a utahraptor and a velociraptor, the former looking feathery and the latter looking how it did in the movies.

I saw some video's on youtube. It looked really good. Is it also on Iphone? Couldnt find it in the appstore :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Apr 11, 2015, 11:27:39 PM
I don't think it's come out everywhere yet, the people playing it on youtube are playing off of the aussie appstore.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Apr 12, 2015, 03:58:18 AM
so glad to see people upset about joss's comment as i am. sad to see so many people agreeing with them. Anyways that game is looking really nice.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 12, 2015, 04:45:50 AM
What's the game? Is it another park builder game?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on Apr 12, 2015, 06:38:42 AM
Basically, it's like a spiritual successor type thing. There's an easter egg in it where you can see the ruined remains of the old park builder game on the island.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 12, 2015, 01:16:52 PM
Gah, such an overused concept now. I used to pine for a new dinosaur game but really, what are our options? Either you hunt dinosaurs or build a JP-style park. Primal: The Hunted is an interesting game though from what I've seen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightlord on Apr 12, 2015, 03:22:31 PM
Jurassic Park isolation is something a lot of people brought up when Alien isolation came out, that could be good if done well. 
A game where you get to play as the dinosaurs would be nice too, I remember the lost world game being really damn good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 12, 2015, 03:56:55 PM
You can play as a dinosaur in Primal Carnage, and they're planning some kind of co-op vs AI mode for PC: Extinction.

Saurian looks very interesting, and is something I've been wanting to see for a long time - a thorough simulation of a dinosaur ecosystem (Hell Creek formation). There's a thread on these boards somewhere.

I think what's missing is a really good park sim. Operation Genesis was great, but is very old now, and even back in the day it was crying out for a more polished sequel with deeper gameplay. JP Park Builder is the closest we have today and it's a piece of shit mobile game.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Apr 12, 2015, 04:53:35 PM
They really should've done that dino mod for Far Cry 3 everyone was clamouring for.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 12, 2015, 06:06:29 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CCaPmJbUsAIkTtc.png:large)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Apr 13, 2015, 12:18:35 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Apr 12, 2015, 03:56:55 PM
I think what's missing is a really good park sim. Operation Genesis was great, but is very old now, and even back in the day it was crying out for a more polished sequel with deeper gameplay. JP Park Builder is the closest we have today and it's a piece of shit mobile game.

Look up Prehistoric Kingdom
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 13, 2015, 02:11:46 AM
Quote from: Gate on Apr 13, 2015, 12:18:35 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Apr 12, 2015, 03:56:55 PM
I think what's missing is a really good park sim. Operation Genesis was great, but is very old now, and even back in the day it was crying out for a more polished sequel with deeper gameplay. JP Park Builder is the closest we have today and it's a piece of shit mobile game.

Look up Prehistoric Kingdom
Yes that game looks great!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 13, 2015, 04:47:16 AM
I know this is a LONG shot but does anyone have the soundtrack to Jurassic Park: The Game by Telltale Games?  I heard it was released only for those who bought the Deluxe Edition but that edition is sold out and I can't find the soundtrack anywhere. :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 13, 2015, 07:17:19 AM
Quote from: Gate on Apr 13, 2015, 12:18:35 AM
Look up Prehistoric Kingdom

Sweet bountiful Flying Spaghetti Monster, that looks amazing. And not just the project itself - I love that they're keeping the community constantly updated with development news, unlike Black Mesa which is almost as teeth-grindingly mysterious as Valve itself.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 15, 2015, 03:18:40 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esvyeJdBw6g (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esvyeJdBw6g)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Apr 16, 2015, 07:46:32 PM
Bigger version of the EW article, shows a bit more of the dinosaurs

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs11.postimg.org%2F6yhto3zwy%2FEWfull.jpg&hash=19b6071a6a79a804ba236c554d91be845eb0ee3e)

and the first still of Vivian (Lauren Lapkus)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs24.postimg.org%2Fgm6gv97px%2F11138589_916747375036441_6341129855000254247_n.jpg&hash=3c1cb88b5b85221813a49223b566a0a160505608)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Apr 17, 2015, 04:43:56 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1309.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fs625%2Fatacamadesert86%2Fjurassic-world-poster_zpsbawskdbh.jpg&hash=3246c5fc0a4d0fd523560b96ba742ed8314496e1)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Apr 17, 2015, 05:08:58 PM
I like the poster.

also, new trailer on monday.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naissus on Apr 17, 2015, 05:14:48 PM
I hope Jurassic World does well.  Maybe Capcom will greenlight another Dino Crisis if the movie does well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 17, 2015, 06:00:43 PM
Good dear that booty looks so dreamy...


...ahem uh uhm, I.rex looks kinda oversized to me.
Title: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 17, 2015, 06:25:49 PM
After looking at the viral site for Jurassic World, it's got me wondering whether this movie acknowledges the game by Telltale as canon.  They both feature the Mosasaurus (probably the same one) and if the dinosaurs in Jurassic World are the same ones from Jurassic Park, as the site implies with the T-Rex, then it must mean that Dr. Sorka's fix for the lysine contingency must have existed otherwise the dinosaurs never would have survived 2 weeks let alone 2 decades.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Apr 17, 2015, 06:35:19 PM
The animals, to Ian Malcolm's surprise, continued to thrive on Isla Sorna in spite of the lysine failsafe due to the herbivore's abilities to consume soy and other lysine-rich foods. Sarah Harding, the paleontologist and animal behaviorist who had studied the animals in the field, also proposed the continued survival of the island's carnivore population because of their consumption of herbivores which had fed on those lysine-rich foods.

In actuality, lysine is an essential amino acid which cannot be produced naturally by most animals; therefore, the contingency plan would actually not have allowed much of anything to prevent the animals from surviving off the island. There are several lysine-rich foods that could sufficiently supply any animals that had escaped from Isla Nublar or Sorna with the lysine they would need to survive, including catfish, chickens, soybeans, eggs, and kidney beans. Many of these are readily available in nature, and are easily accessible to wild animals, including any dinosaurs that may have escaped from Isla Nublar.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Apr 17, 2015, 06:48:36 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Apr 17, 2015, 06:00:43 PM
Good dear that booty looks so dreamy...


...ahem uh uhm, I.rex looks kinda oversized to me.

And those crooked teeth are so Peter Jackson style :p
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 17, 2015, 06:50:36 PM
Yeah, I remember the Isla Sorna explanation but I'd think the case would be different in Nublar because the scientists were to make sure the environment was more controlled there whereas in Site B all the animals were left to die.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 18, 2015, 08:47:55 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Apr 17, 2015, 06:25:49 PM
After looking at the viral site for Jurassic World, it's got me wondering whether this movie acknowledges the game by Telltale as canon.  They both feature the Mosasaurus

JP game was Tylosaurus, called a Mosasaur after its species family name. http://jurassicpark.wikia.com/wiki/Tylosaurus (http://jurassicpark.wikia.com/wiki/Tylosaurus)

On http://www.masraniglobal.com/about/divisions/jurassicworld/index.html (http://www.masraniglobal.com/about/divisions/jurassicworld/index.html) it mentions hints of things from the game like the volcano's name and the native tribes. Its canon if you want it to be. If not it works also.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 18, 2015, 03:51:56 PM
HQ

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg11.hostingpics.net%2Fpics%2F902373juwopbh.jpg&hash=bab92ed61416d81e7898389bd63a04bc60e2f601)

another new poster:

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CC2qatiW4AAWkhN.jpg:large)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DarthJoker45 on Apr 18, 2015, 03:54:43 PM
Ok, I don't know if this is real or fake, but regardless, it looks amazing! (http://www.cosmicbooknews.com/content/watch-jurassic-world-indominus-rex-roar-walk-promo)
Title: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 18, 2015, 05:20:37 PM
My sources on Facebook say it's legit, there's supposed to be a 3rd poster as well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on Apr 18, 2015, 10:48:56 PM
Not meaning to be dat guy who goes on nitpicking, but that second poster is pretty horrible (the boy, the shark)... at least the Mosasaurus looks awesome!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on Apr 18, 2015, 11:00:30 PM
It's my favorite poster so far. Would love to have one of those mosasaur posters ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Apr 19, 2015, 02:40:31 AM
Out of curiousity, if the JW film is very successful, will we see a wave of more dino themed films? Also, can anyone further explain the Ingen Siberia Project (from what I've seen, Ingen/Martel have a project in Siberia to extract frozen remains...)? TY
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 19, 2015, 04:38:58 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CC99mdeVIAEqzZu.jpg:large)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 19, 2015, 04:53:48 PM
Oh God, not that again. :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Apr 19, 2015, 05:18:56 PM
Oh God yes! ha
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 19, 2015, 05:27:39 PM
It wouldn't be as bad if it was anyone but Chris Pratt controlling the raptors, the guy's character seems stuck up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Apr 19, 2015, 05:42:51 PM
cant wait for the trailer to see some raptor action
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 19, 2015, 05:46:16 PM
Those raptors are Chris-whipped. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Apr 19, 2015, 05:50:03 PM
thats even better for me
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on Apr 19, 2015, 06:19:45 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Apr 19, 2015, 02:40:31 AM
Out of curiousity, if the JW film is very successful, will we see a wave of more dino themed films? Also, can anyone further explain the Ingen Siberia Project (from what I've seen, Ingen/Martel have a project in Siberia to extract frozen remains...)? TY

sounds like mammoths and sabretooth-Tigers are in the pipeline thenl...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 19, 2015, 06:31:32 PM

Quote from: szkoki on Apr 19, 2015, 05:50:03 PM
thats even better for me

At least someone will enjoy it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Apr 19, 2015, 07:13:53 PM
Quote from: Tangakkai on Apr 19, 2015, 06:19:45 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Apr 19, 2015, 02:40:31 AM
Out of curiousity, if the JW film is very successful, will we see a wave of more dino themed films? Also, can anyone further explain the Ingen Siberia Project (from what I've seen, Ingen/Martel have a project in Siberia to extract frozen remains...)? TY

sounds like mammoths and sabretooth-Tigers are in the pipeline thenl...
Ice Age World debuts in 2025 :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Apr 19, 2015, 08:04:03 PM
I heard the tension between Owen & The Raptors is very strong and suspenseful all through the film...so it's all about how this is executed...

That image works better as a banner:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs14.postimg.org%2Fr9whccd33%2FNaamloos_1222.jpg&hash=d672de8b4b71af2c9fbc6804d6c096cef67ad6ae)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Scree on Apr 19, 2015, 08:33:36 PM
So after "Jumping the shark" and "Nuking the fridge" we can finally say "Riding with the raptors".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 19, 2015, 11:18:14 PM
Quote from: Scree on Apr 19, 2015, 08:33:36 PM
So after "Jumping the shark" and "Nuking the fridge" we can finally say "Riding with the raptors".

No. The fewer idiotic phrases, the better.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 19, 2015, 11:19:10 PM
I'm sure it has already been said but: The week of movie trailers, with @JurassicPark trailer on Monday!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 20, 2015, 04:37:06 AM
Those posters are fantastic. Some of the best in the series, IMO.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Apr 20, 2015, 02:59:53 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJJrkyHas78#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJJrkyHas78#ws)

fapfap its more like a Dino Crisis movie :3

i think  I-Rex isnt crawled out of the 40 feet high walls rather fooled them that she crawled to lure them in so she can escape
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Apr 20, 2015, 03:10:55 PM
So they changed the shark with the Pteranodon, weird and interesting.
Happy to see there was at least a SMALL sign of the Tyrannosaurus. I hope they give her more screentime then that tho.
Other then that, I multi jizzed all over while watching this trailer, its gonna be so epic and amazing! JP one will always be my fave but JW seems a worthy succesor.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on Apr 20, 2015, 03:16:43 PM
Quote from: szkoki on Apr 20, 2015, 02:59:53 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJJrkyHas78#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJJrkyHas78#ws)

fapfap its more like a Dino Crisis movie :3

i think  I-Rex isnt crawled out of the 40 feet high walls rather fooled them that she crawled to lure them in so she can escape

Yeah it really looks like a 'Jurassic park' & 'Dino Crisis' mix. And as a huge fan of both, I actually love it!! That trailer gave me a 1000 nerdgasms  :laugh: :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightlord on Apr 20, 2015, 03:39:06 PM
Awesome, looks like the raptors are attacking people at 2:07.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Apr 20, 2015, 03:47:09 PM
Yep, we got attacking raptors.

that trailer gave us plenty of Dino action, I don't need to see anything else now. I'm sold.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on Apr 20, 2015, 03:50:12 PM
Also I love the tension between Owen and the raptors. And the I.rex chasing the ankylosaurs, o my :o Not even mentioning the fluid movements of the mosasaur. That effect is breathtaking.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Apr 20, 2015, 03:54:48 PM
Eh, I dunno what it is, but I just can't get excited for this film, and the new trailer hasn't changed that.
Title: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 20, 2015, 04:09:23 PM
Wait, the Dinos can communicate interspecies with each other?  That's pushing it very far.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Apr 20, 2015, 04:23:30 PM
look raptors killing people lol

all y'all and your trained raptor bullshit
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on Apr 20, 2015, 04:25:20 PM
Quote from: predxeno on Apr 20, 2015, 04:09:23 PM
Wait, the Dinos can communicate interspecies with each other?  That's pushing it very far.

I have no idea where you got that from. Most likely they're just talking about the raptors. And they have always communicated with each other.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 20, 2015, 04:26:46 PM
Oh, there was a shot of the I-Rex roaring at some flying Dinos around that scene so it sounded like the I-Rex was telling them to attack tourists.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Njm1983 on Apr 20, 2015, 04:41:54 PM
Could have just as easily be the I Rex scaring them to get them out of their cage to cause havok. They are predatory in nature.

I'm sold on this as well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scarhunter92 on Apr 20, 2015, 04:44:16 PM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on Apr 20, 2015, 03:10:55 PMSo they changed the shark with the Pteranodon, weird and interesting.

They didn't. It's a different scene.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 20, 2015, 04:46:09 PM
Guys, help me. Please. I'm soooooooooooooooo tempted to watch the new trailer but I must ask: how spoilery is it? I'm told that the I.Rex is fully revealed, but other than that?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Apr 20, 2015, 05:02:15 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 20, 2015, 04:46:09 PM
Guys, help me. Please. I'm soooooooooooooooo tempted to watch the new trailer but I must ask: how spoilery is it? I'm told that the I.Rex is fully revealed, but other than that?
It spoils the entire film plot.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 20, 2015, 05:20:09 PM
Quote from: Gate on Apr 20, 2015, 05:02:15 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 20, 2015, 04:46:09 PM
Guys, help me. Please. I'm soooooooooooooooo tempted to watch the new trailer but I must ask: how spoilery is it? I'm told that the I.Rex is fully revealed, but other than that?
It spoils the entire film plot.

Are you pulling my leg or are you being serious?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Apr 20, 2015, 05:50:41 PM
hes joking( i think) there are some new neat shots that u"ll prob want to see in the theatre.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Keg on Apr 20, 2015, 06:45:50 PM
Looks like theres going to be some great set pieces in this but im still a bit iffy on the whole tamed raptors thing. See how it pans out when I go see it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 20, 2015, 06:48:37 PM
That was nuts. Gotta love how Wu now dresses and speaks like a Bond villain.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Darkness on Apr 20, 2015, 06:52:43 PM
Awesome trailer. I had my doubts about the genetically-created dinosaur and training raptors but the action in the trailer looks great.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Apr 20, 2015, 07:06:51 PM
how are people still saying the raptors are tamed, it's been said in a clip and this trailer they aren't controlled or tamed, it's a mutual respect and it shows that it's only between them and Pratt's character. you clearly see the raptor attacking a soldier in the back of the vehicle.

no tamed or controlled dinos
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Darkness on Apr 20, 2015, 07:15:27 PM
Trained or not. It just isn't realistic. It'd never happen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on Apr 20, 2015, 07:26:16 PM
Quote from: Darkness on Apr 20, 2015, 07:15:27 PM
Trained or not. It just isn't realistic. It'd never happen.

Yeah just how you can't tame bears & tigers & lions & even crocodiles...

I seriously don't get why people have such a problem with it. Every animal is tameable to some extent. But they still are extremely dangerous animals. And there is always some kind of tension. You even see/feel it in the last trailer. They have a bond with pratt's character. But it won't last forever. They will turn on him or snap at him when something unexpected happens.

The tamed raptors are totally plausible. Crichton even covered it in his book.

Also you've gotta give them credit for doing something fresh instead of going with the same old routine. This can actually add a lot of tension to the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Apr 20, 2015, 07:29:07 PM
Yes it could totally happen especially if he has been with them for a long time... they're still animals...the guy who saw a screener said there is still a lot of tension between Owen and the raptors. There are other raptors in the restricted area and Owen's raptors go back to their natural instinct at the end.

One thing that confuses me in this trailer, the Mosasaur is much smaller now...maybe there are more?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Apr 20, 2015, 07:33:17 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on Apr 20, 2015, 07:26:16 PMAlso you've gotta give them credit for doing something fresh instead of going with the same old routine. This can actually add a lot of tension to the movie.

:laugh: Yes. A man leading his raptor buddies into battle on a motorcycle.

So tense.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on Apr 20, 2015, 07:34:39 PM
Looks like the same one. Look at the half shark compared to the first shot where he/she bites the shark in half. Size seems the same.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Foi61.tinypic.com%2F2zfkeaf.jpg&hash=f29ccf21674852ed283ed89f27fd4ee6c6779647)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Foi60.tinypic.com%2F2ezu6us.jpg&hash=3ad3249a33da9e74b00fe97b51beceac78666903)

Quote from: HuDaFuK on Apr 20, 2015, 07:33:17 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on Apr 20, 2015, 07:26:16 PMAlso you've gotta give them credit for doing something fresh instead of going with the same old routine. This can actually add a lot of tension to the movie.

:laugh: Yes. A man leading his raptor buddies into battle on a motorcycle.

So tense.

Now you're just sarcasticly ignoring the rest of the footage they show with Owen and the Raptors. He could've been with them since birth. They do imprint on the first person they see (as Wu said in the first movie). They could see pratt as some sort of 'pact leader'. And that one shot won't take away anything from the tension in the rest of the film. It looks like the whole relationship between pratt and the raptors will be a big part of the story.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Apr 20, 2015, 07:40:38 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on Apr 20, 2015, 07:34:39 PMNow you're just sarcasticly ignoring the rest of the footage they show with Owen and the Raptors.

No, I just find the entire concept of that scene dumb.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Wrecktangle on Apr 20, 2015, 08:26:10 PM
Not enough Tyrannosaurus Rex action  :P

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Apr 20, 2015, 08:42:44 PM
You won't see much of the T-Rex all through the movie, at the end she is released by Claire...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Keg on Apr 20, 2015, 09:02:51 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Apr 20, 2015, 07:40:38 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on Apr 20, 2015, 07:34:39 PMNow you're just sarcasticly ignoring the rest of the footage they show with Owen and the Raptors.

No, I just find the entire concept of that scene dumb.

Even though its plausible and definately possible I just think back to the way the Raptors were set up in the original film and the way they were treated by the characters, especially by Muldoon. Now im supposed to accept that a man is mental enough to try and create some kind of connection with them. Its no different to somebody doing it with a lion or a tiger in real life but it just kinda pisses on what I grew up thinking about them. Hopefully when I see it ill change my mind. Its only small bits from a trailer after all and everything else looks superb. Cant wait.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Apr 20, 2015, 09:14:50 PM
Quote from: Darkness on Apr 20, 2015, 07:15:27 PM
Trained or not. It just isn't realistic. It'd never happen.

yeah in the real Jurassic World that'd never....oh wait what?

Quote from: MudButt on Apr 20, 2015, 07:06:51 PM
how are people still saying the raptors are tamed, it's been said in a clip and this trailer they aren't controlled or tamed, it's a mutual respect and it shows that it's only between them and Pratt's character. you clearly see the raptor attacking a soldier in the back of the vehicle.

no tamed or controlled dinos

when the black dude says "something is wrong, they are communicating" (night) also a soldier gets attacked by a raptor (night), i think they will turn on the humans at some point to break free
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightlord on Apr 20, 2015, 09:32:55 PM
I just noticed there's what looks to be a half finished Spinosaurus skeleton in the trailer.  I bet the rex will end up smashing it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Apr 20, 2015, 10:22:25 PM
This movie looks awesome. It reminds me a little of the Godzilla trailer except I think we will get to see more of the iRex in this movie. It's obvious that this movie is criticizing man's insatiable appetite to be entertained. The Mosasaurus is ridiculously huge because they engineered it that way. Only way to spike attendance was to play Frankenstein and create the perfect e-a-t-i-n-g  m-a-c-h-i-n-e. Plus the dino had to be highly intelligent if you are going to up the action factor.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Apr 20, 2015, 10:46:41 PM
Quote from: Darkness on Apr 20, 2015, 06:52:43 PM
Awesome trailer. I had my doubts about the genetically-created dinosaur and training raptors but the action in the trailer looks great.
This.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Apr 20, 2015, 10:47:56 PM
Quote from: Darkness on Apr 20, 2015, 07:15:27 PM
Trained or not. It just isn't realistic. It'd never happen.

no way to prove that. besides, it's not like they look particularly happy to see him in that scene.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Wrecktangle on Apr 20, 2015, 10:58:56 PM
Quote from: Nightlord on Apr 20, 2015, 09:32:55 PM
I just noticed there's what looks to be a half finished Spinosaurus skeleton in the trailer.  I bet the rex will end up smashing it.

How cheeky would that be? I'll piss myself laughing if that happens.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DaddyYautja on Apr 21, 2015, 12:56:27 AM
Quote from: Keg on Apr 20, 2015, 09:02:51 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Apr 20, 2015, 07:40:38 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on Apr 20, 2015, 07:34:39 PMNow you're just sarcasticly ignoring the rest of the footage they show with Owen and the Raptors.

No, I just find the entire concept of that scene dumb.

Even though its plausible and definately possible I just think back to the way the Raptors were set up in the original film and the way they were treated by the characters, especially by Muldoon. Now im supposed to accept that a man is mental enough to try and create some kind of connection with them. Its no different to somebody doing it with a lion or a tiger in real life but it just kinda pisses on what I grew up thinking about them. Hopefully when I see it ill change my mind. Its only small bits from a trailer after all and everything else looks superb. Cant wait.

How about a man with Lion and Hyenas?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNCzSfv4hX8 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNCzSfv4hX8)

People need to relax with the Raptors, it's a freaking movie, man. It's not like they are using laser weaponry and it's all of a sudden Dino Riders.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Apr 21, 2015, 01:11:56 AM
As long as they kill humans and give the middle claw to Pratt I am happy ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 21, 2015, 01:37:38 AM
I tried so hard to not watch this trailer but everybody was raving about it on social media  :'( looks epic  :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Novak 1334 on Apr 21, 2015, 02:33:28 AM
Looking forward to it, but I wish trailers would stop showing so goddamn much!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 21, 2015, 06:52:29 AM
It looks perfect! ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Apr 21, 2015, 07:34:29 AM
Quote from: DaddyYautja on Apr 21, 2015, 12:56:27 AMHow about a man with Lion and Hyenas?

People never talk about lions the way Muldoon talked about the raptors.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Apr 21, 2015, 09:23:39 AM
Man talks to dinosaur.

Dinosaur talks to dinosaur.

Woman tells you to run.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 21, 2015, 10:03:52 AM
Quote from: frenchfries on Apr 20, 2015, 05:50:41 PM
hes joking( i think) there are some new neat shots that u"ll prob want to see in the theatre.
In any case, I watched it. I loved it more than I thought I would. So I watched it again, then I watched the Super Bowl spot for the first time. Then I rewatched the first trailer for November. I cried so hard :')

My excitement levels went up one thousand fold!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Apr 21, 2015, 10:46:35 AM
duh, running in heels from the T/I Rex??
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 21, 2015, 11:05:21 AM
Quote from: Taxemic on Apr 21, 2015, 09:23:39 AM
Man talks to dinosaur.

Dinosaur talks to dinosaur.

Woman tells you to run.

*searches feverishly for a 'Like' button*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Apr 21, 2015, 11:10:30 AM
I'm really looking forward to this. The first JP was the first film I ever saw in the cinema so it holds a special place to me. I don't mind the Rapter training. It's not like it hasn't been done with animals before. And at the end of the day, it's fiction so...as long as it works and it's a good film. The trailer seems to show the rapters turning so it may just further enhance their intelligence to show them tricking Chris' character.

Besides...it's like the meme says.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FuGyTiD1.png&hash=40508218fb45cc3e218a36d5e67588e642fed60d)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 21, 2015, 11:19:07 AM
You know what I think I'm going to love most about the new dinosaur is this "killing for sport bit". It reminds me of the original Sharptooth from the first Land Before Time. Who else remembers the sheer viciousness and ferocity of that thing? The new dino is a genuine villain and not just an animal doing animal stuff.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on Apr 21, 2015, 11:30:25 AM
Quote from: szkoki on Apr 21, 2015, 10:46:35 AM
duh, running in heels from the T/I Rex??

I thought they where heels too. But then I watched the trailer in slowmotion :P It seems like they are just flat shoes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Apr 21, 2015, 11:36:33 AM
Even if they were, it's not like she'd have the time to go "hmmm...might have a dinosaur outbreak today. Best go get my flats."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Apr 21, 2015, 11:37:26 AM
If I worked in a dinosaur park that has a bit of a history of people getting nommed?

Comfortable running shoes 24/7.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Apr 21, 2015, 11:56:03 AM
It's obviously been running without any issues for a long time now. I'm sure suitable boots and etc are required for the handlers but probably not office folk.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Apr 21, 2015, 12:09:11 PM
It looks like heels to me... however the rumors of this dinosaur being "invisible" must be true as it appears to just pop out of no where every damn time in the trailer. It also appears that the raptors turn on the human gang pretty damn fast. Maybe JW will do the amazing and eat everyone(including the kids) and only leave Pratts character standing. Out of mutual respect. Well maybe his scientist girl friend too. You know, gotta eat, gotta hunt, gotta bam chicka wah wah! It's not so much respect as professional curiosity. :P

Also the cgi looks amazing with each trailer, why the hell can't T5 do that. :P

Actually maybe a nice ending for the movie would be the raptors keep Pratt as a pet. That would be hilarious.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 21, 2015, 12:27:31 PM
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Apr 21, 2015, 11:10:30 AM
I'm really looking forward to this. The first JP was the first film I ever saw in the cinema so it holds a special place to me. I don't mind the Rapter training. It's not like it hasn't been done with animals before. And at the end of the day, it's fiction so...as long as it works and it's a good film. The trailer seems to show the rapters turning so it may just further enhance their intelligence to show them tricking Chris' character.

Besides...it's like the meme says.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FuGyTiD1.png&hash=40508218fb45cc3e218a36d5e67588e642fed60d)

"I have an army."
"We have a Hulk."
"We have Star Lord on a motorcycle...WITH RAPTORS!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 21, 2015, 02:45:04 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Apr 21, 2015, 07:34:29 AM
Quote from: DaddyYautja on Apr 21, 2015, 12:56:27 AMHow about a man with Lion and Hyenas?

People never talk about lions the way Muldoon talked about the raptors.
But at the same time the original JP confirms they're similar to birds in that they imprint to who they first see when just hatched.

So if they saw Owen first, I think it helps make it more believable. Even if he wasn't the one that they saw first, he treats them a whole lot better than Muldoon did. They are animals after all though so they shouldn't have to convince people that it's even remotely possible for them to be tamed to a certain degree. These animals are intelligent, after all.

But hell they could even say some bull about them bio engineering them to be less hostile.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Njm1983 on Apr 21, 2015, 03:43:10 PM
On the subject of Pratt and his interaction with raptors. Do you think he is living on sorna with them?

Seems like his shack is somewhere tropical, I would expect he would need to interact with the raptors regularly to maintain some sort of pack connection. Could be that he and the raptors are brought to the park. Might also explain why the raptors are so pissed when they are in the enclosure with him.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 21, 2015, 04:10:55 PM
Probably. Social cohesion, I'm pretty sure, is needed to maintain pack behaviour. If the leader disappears, I don't see why the bond would remain strong.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 21, 2015, 06:48:40 PM
Scenes on Sorna would be the icing on the cake for this movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Apr 21, 2015, 06:49:17 PM
Did someone say inivisible dinosaur
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc04.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2Fi%2F2010%2F226%2F1%2F1%2FJurassic_Park_Carnotaurus_by_pauloomarcio.jpg&hash=0a15fe3684f543231cab2e7983a8aae42d482f16)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 21, 2015, 07:21:52 PM
Quote from: Gate on Apr 21, 2015, 06:49:17 PM
Did someone say inivisible dinosaur
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc04.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2Fi%2F2010%2F226%2F1%2F1%2FJurassic_Park_Carnotaurus_by_pauloomarcio.jpg&hash=0a15fe3684f543231cab2e7983a8aae42d482f16)

Yass. I wish the Carnotaurs themselves had the chameleon camouflage though but if the I-Rex has it that's allright. Definitely feels more forced though. If the Carnotaurs had the camouflage and it was just something the scientists were surprised by when it happened, like the Dilophosaurs, it would feel more natural.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Apr 21, 2015, 10:24:48 PM
Has anyone thought that maybe the aggression the raptors showed in the trailer towards Pratt was all just a part of the show?

Quote from: xeno-kaname on Apr 21, 2015, 07:21:52 PM
Quote from: Gate on Apr 21, 2015, 06:49:17 PM
Did someone say inivisible dinosaur
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc04.deviantart.net%2Ffs70%2Fi%2F2010%2F226%2F1%2F1%2FJurassic_Park_Carnotaurus_by_pauloomarcio.jpg&hash=0a15fe3684f543231cab2e7983a8aae42d482f16)

Yass. I wish the Carnotaurs themselves had the chameleon camouflage though but if the I-Rex has it that's allright. Definitely feels more forced though. If the Carnotaurs had the camouflage and it was just something the scientists were surprised by when it happened, like the Dilophosaurs, it would feel more natural.
You know... how do we know that in real life it did not have that ability? Perhaps it was a dinosaur that could cloak itself invisible. After all, all we have to study them are bones and it was not mentioned that the Carnotaurus itself was ever cloned.

edit: come to think of it, we did see one in one of the movies didn't we?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 21, 2015, 10:47:26 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on Apr 20, 2015, 07:26:16 PM
Quote from: Darkness on Apr 20, 2015, 07:15:27 PM
Trained or not. It just isn't realistic. It'd never happen.

Yeah just how you can't tame bears & tigers & lions & even crocodiles...

I seriously don't get why people have such a problem with it. Every animal is tameable to some extent. But they still are extremely dangerous animals. And there is always some kind of tension. You even see/feel it in the last trailer. They have a bond with pratt's character. But it won't last forever. They will turn on him or snap at him when something unexpected happens.

The tamed raptors are totally plausible. Crichton even covered it in his book.

Also you've gotta give them credit for doing something fresh instead of going with the same old routine. This can actually add a lot of tension to the movie.

My sole issue with the "trained raptors" is the person who is controlling them; I just really don't like Chris Pratt as the guy in charge of them, he strikes me more of a comedy figure than a stand-alone action guy and seeing him in this role is akin to seeing Adam Sandler in it.  Btw as long as we're on the subject, I don't think the series needed another super-theropod-can-kill-t-rex dino in it; JP3 already did that with the Spinosaurus.  I think future sequels will do better if they followed the direction provided in Jurassic Park: The Game by Telltale and have the new dino be not one but an entire pack of raptor-like dinos that when together can overcome even a T-Rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Keg on Apr 21, 2015, 11:14:39 PM
Whenever people type cast an actor in their head as to what type of roles they suit I always think back to Die Hard. "What? The guy from Moonlighting as an action hero? Ridiculous.".

Thats why theyre called "actors".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 21, 2015, 11:19:51 PM
Fair enough, but for the record I already don't like how his character is being portrayed in the short clip they showed us; in fact, many people have already categorized Owen as a mega-douche:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfZwU24LWIA (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfZwU24LWIA)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Apr 22, 2015, 12:06:43 AM
the guy makes two sex jokes and hes considered a mega douche? jeez well at least he had a lot of serious lines in the newest trailer. its nice to have a lead that can be goofy but also serious when the time calls for it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 22, 2015, 12:23:48 AM
Funnily enough, Joss Whedon tweeted that Jurassic World looked sexist based on that remark:

Quote...and I'm too busy wishing this clip wasn't 70's era sexist.  She's a stiff, he's a life-force  - really? Still?

http://time.com/3817599/joss-whedon-tweets-that-jurassic-world-looks-sexist/ (http://time.com/3817599/joss-whedon-tweets-that-jurassic-world-looks-sexist/)

I didn't quite consider Owen to be sexist but personally I found his jokes to be quite inappropriate in a workplace environment.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Apr 22, 2015, 12:30:17 AM
joss also responded in a interview that he pretty much over reacted and shouldnt of said that. well they previosly went on a date so its not that inappropriate plus there tlking at his house.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 22, 2015, 01:09:33 AM
It may just be my dislike of Pratt in this role but I found his role of Owen to be dislikable; even if they dated once it was still over the line of him to make that second joke (if not the first).  I mean, would you find it funny if one of your exes came to your place of work and implied you were sexually inadequate in bed (and after only one date no less)?  I've never gravitated to the he-men/G.I. Joe type, they seem overly stereotyped and bland at this point, an Alex Mercer/Asajj Ventress character would have been more appropriate; they can be heroic to some degree but that's often hidden under a shroud of darkness which can make them scary, dark, and volatile (a perfect mirror to the behavior of the raptors, I think, I wouldn't know why the raptors would want to obey someone different for any length of time).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Apr 22, 2015, 01:13:10 AM
his jokes were really tame compared to ur example.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 22, 2015, 01:26:18 AM
Isn't that what he did?

QuoteThey're thinking I got to eat, I got to hunt, I got to (makes sexual gesture).  You can relate to at least one of those things, right?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Njm1983 on Apr 22, 2015, 01:35:46 AM
I didnt think he implied she was sexually inadequate. They had a history and he pulled their sexual tension into it. He just seems comfortable with who he is when around her.

I think the ones who are saying "mega-douche" are over reacting.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 22, 2015, 01:53:55 AM
People are still fussing over that? Geez. It was one, harmless line. What's the big deal?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 22, 2015, 01:58:03 AM
I actually don't know if people are still upset about that; I haven't been following what people have been saying, it was just one example I chose to bring up of why I don't like Chris Pratt's character. :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 22, 2015, 05:21:58 AM
Quote from: Njm1983 on Apr 22, 2015, 01:35:46 AM
I didnt think he implied she was sexually inadequate. They had a history and he pulled their sexual tension into it. He just seems comfortable with who he is when around her.

I think the ones who are saying "mega-douche" are over reacting.
All of this. I didn't get the impression that they even had sex, just went on a date. But obviously there was probably some sort of courting process before that so yeah I thought it felt natural that he was that comfortable with her because he knows her as more than a boss.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 22, 2015, 06:07:27 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Apr 22, 2015, 05:21:58 AM
Quote from: Njm1983 on Apr 22, 2015, 01:35:46 AM
I didnt think he implied she was sexually inadequate. They had a history and he pulled their sexual tension into it. He just seems comfortable with who he is when around her.

I think the ones who are saying "mega-douche" are over reacting.
All of this. I didn't get the impression that they even had sex, just went on a date. But obviously there was probably some sort of courting process before that so yeah I thought it felt natural that he was that comfortable with her because he knows her as more than a boss.

Yeah I figured that too, which is why I didn't make a big deal about it like others did, however just because he feels comfortable with their sexual tension doesn't mean she is and the entire scene just makes Owen look immature (I mean casting sexual innuendos at your boss, seriously?).  Owen seems to be a character fusion of Alan Grant and Ian Malcolm, Grant's dino expertise and Malcolm's personality.  I always liked Grant more because he was a dino expert and he seemed to handle himself more maturely in the first film than Malcolm.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Apr 22, 2015, 07:20:18 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kR1Kav3qnA#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kR1Kav3qnA#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Apr 22, 2015, 07:33:42 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Apr 21, 2015, 10:47:26 PM


My sole issue with the "trained raptors" is the person who is controlling them; I just really don't like Chris Pratt as the guy in charge of them, he strikes me more of a comedy figure than a stand-alone action guy and seeing him in this role is akin to seeing Adam Sandler in it.


I still don't know what to think about Pratt's portrayal of Owen either. I personally didn't like the clip they released at all, seems to "lets put some humor a la Guardians of the Galaxy in here, because that will appeal people even more to Pratt's character"or something similair. At least that's what it felt like to me.

I did like him allot in his more serious scenes though, so I won't judge before I seen the whole movie but I personally believe that wasn't a good first clip to release, as someone mentioned before. I hope there won't be more simulair scenes like that between them (with such sexist remarks/forced humor). I preferred the relationship between Sarah and Malcolm allot more in TLW, there was "some" tension about their past, but that seemed more mature then what we saw in the JW clip.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Apr 22, 2015, 08:02:48 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Apr 21, 2015, 10:47:26 PM
My sole issue with the "trained raptors" is the person who is controlling them; I just really don't like Chris Pratt as the guy in charge of them, he strikes me more of a comedy figure than a stand-alone action guy and seeing him in this role is akin to seeing Adam Sandler in it. 

Get. Out. Now.

Blasphemer!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Apr 22, 2015, 09:56:09 AM
no1: yes she is in high heels in the short clip with Owen too and she is running in high heels from the dino
no2: joss whedon is a virgin for sure, movie is not sexist that conversations is more like a healthy arguement between two people who attracted to eachother. and its always the woman who is the stronghold which needs to be conquered and its always that one different guy from the others who is cocky and taking risks, yet he can also be romantic when the time comes. just because its the same male character in every blockbuster it doesnt mean its sexist, its just attractive. and a valuable woman is just like that i mentioned.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FaLXCJFf.jpg&hash=7146d1e8efd84d259928e16e73592be6826cb9f8)


just realized Pratt would be a perfect Nathan Drake


little inspiration taken?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eonline.com%2Feol_images%2FEntire_Site%2F2014513%2Frs_1024x759-140613064427-1024.Chris-Pratt-Jurassic-World-JR-61314.jpg&hash=ecd20961efd2ab19fb2c50bd095a2d985b8c56d1)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fvignette2.wikia.nocookie.net%2Fplaystationfanon%2Fimages%2F2%2F26%2FNathan_Drake.PNG%2Frevision%2Flatest%3Fcb%3D20111216033219&hash=90fe41754cfd19f66585a7e423ff58ca448f9020)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Keg on Apr 22, 2015, 03:17:21 PM
He would make for a decent Drake actually, good shout that. Doesn't look like him but he could definately pull of his personality quirks.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 22, 2015, 04:25:10 PM
Wow, the similarity between those two is striking. :o. Btw, I never liked Uncharted's Drake character either for the very same reasons as Pratt. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Keg on Apr 22, 2015, 04:34:09 PM
Quote from: predxeno on Apr 22, 2015, 04:25:10 PM
Wow, the similarity between those two is striking. :o. Btw, I never liked Uncharted's Drake character either for the very same reasons as Pratt. :P

Wouldn't call it striking. They've got very similar shirts on which kinda helps.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 22, 2015, 04:44:29 PM
Yeah, not to mention very similar personalities.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 22, 2015, 05:25:31 PM
Although Owen's character can be snarky, you can tell he's more serious than anything Chris has done in the recent past. Or possibly ever. And it suits him well. Some of the new shots in the trailer showed him doing a good job at it and I bought the serious side of him. He'll do fine.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 22, 2015, 05:53:24 PM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on Apr 22, 2015, 07:33:42 AM
I did like him allot in his more serious scenes though, so I won't judge before I seen the whole movie but I personally believe that wasn't a good first clip to release, as someone mentioned before. I hope there won't be more simulair scenes like that between them (with such sexist remarks/forced humor). I preferred the relationship between Sarah and Malcolm allot more in TLW, there was "some" tension about their past, but that seemed more mature then what we saw in the JW clip.

I don't mean to point out the obvious, but you can't compare one scene to a 2-hour film. I'm sure it will be explained. Speaking of which, what's the run time of this one?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 22, 2015, 06:15:42 PM
Sexism bah. I never got any of that from the clip people are so sensitive nowadays.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rankles75 on Apr 22, 2015, 06:56:16 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Apr 22, 2015, 06:15:42 PM
Sexism bah. I never got any of that from the clip people are so sensitive nowadays.

It's a harmless, throwaway scene. People will get their panties in a twist over anything these days...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 22, 2015, 09:21:12 PM
I predict that
Spoiler
there will be an end-credits scene featuring Ian Malcolm's return.
[close]
Who's with me? Also, about the "Restricted Area" quickly seen on a map screen in the first trailer, I really, really hope it's explored and
Spoiler
that we see the return of the Dilophosaurus. The poor guy never gets much respect.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 22, 2015, 10:05:56 PM
^Yeah, that creature appears a LOT in the games and such but barely in the movies, why's that? ???
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 22, 2015, 11:34:37 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 22, 2015, 09:21:12 PM
I predict that
Spoiler
there will be an end-credits scene featuring Ian Malcolm's return.
[close]
Who's with me? Also, about the "Restricted Area" quickly seen on a map screen in the first trailer, I really, really hope it's explored and
Spoiler
that we see the return of the Dilophosaurus. The poor guy never gets much respect.
[close]

Well about your second spoiler, I'm not sure if you'd like to know or not but
Spoiler
I had heard they weren't in the movie :( I hope it's not true.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2015, 01:41:47 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Apr 22, 2015, 11:34:37 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 22, 2015, 09:21:12 PM
I predict that
Spoiler
there will be an end-credits scene featuring Ian Malcolm's return.
[close]
Who's with me? Also, about the "Restricted Area" quickly seen on a map screen in the first trailer, I really, really hope it's explored and
Spoiler
that we see the return of the Dilophosaurus. The poor guy never gets much respect.
[close]

Well about your second spoiler, I'm not sure if you'd like to know or not but
Spoiler
I had heard they weren't in the movie :( I hope it's not true.
[close]

Was this from an official source?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 23, 2015, 04:18:35 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2015, 01:41:47 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Apr 22, 2015, 11:34:37 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 22, 2015, 09:21:12 PM
I predict that
Spoiler
there will be an end-credits scene featuring Ian Malcolm's return.
[close]
Who's with me? Also, about the "Restricted Area" quickly seen on a map screen in the first trailer, I really, really hope it's explored and
Spoiler
that we see the return of the Dilophosaurus. The poor guy never gets much respect.
[close]

Well about your second spoiler, I'm not sure if you'd like to know or not but
Spoiler
I had heard they weren't in the movie :( I hope it's not true.
[close]

Was this from an official source?

I don't even remember but it was talked about in this thread a good amount probably like 50 pages back or something lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Apr 23, 2015, 04:43:40 AM
i thought the lego set confirmed that they were in the movie?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 23, 2015, 07:47:21 AM
Spoiler
Dilophosaurus is at least referenced in the movie. Some extras saw a graphic on set illustrating them. And like Frenchfries said, the Lego set suggests we might actually see them - probably fully grown, in an attack scenario.
The main reason we've assumed they're not in is because they're not referenced on the website's species list, but that can be explained if Dilophosaurus isn't a caged exhibit (which makes sense as they're explaining the venom, spitting, frill and head shape on bad DNA).

Also, the list is probably incomplete. There's another species list (http://i1274.photobucket.com/albums/y428/siluriandalek/CirclesonMap2_zpsbc3c1da4.jpg) based on a prop within the film, which has some animals that aren't on the website - including Spinosaurus (which we know is in the film at least as a skeleton, in its pre-2014 form) and Plesiosaurus, which some sources have indicated to be inhabiting the lagoon. It appears to show Dilophosaurus, as the Alien Queen-looking silhouette in the middle of the left half.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2015, 12:00:07 PM
You know something? Being fed with spoilers doesn't bother me as much as I thought it would. f**k, I've missed out on some great discussions in this thread haven't I? Also, here's hoping Spinosaurus makes a comeback as well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 23, 2015, 04:22:40 PM

Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2015, 12:00:07 PM
Also, here's hoping Spinosaurus makes a comeback as well.

^Here's to that. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 23, 2015, 06:07:40 PM
God, Doom finally changed his profile picture. Cheers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 23, 2015, 06:23:42 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Apr 23, 2015, 06:07:40 PM
God, Doom finally changed his profile picture. Cheers.
:laugh: He'll probably change it back just for you xD

JW is also making me want to change sets. I had actually just come back from requesting help when I read this haha
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 23, 2015, 07:46:28 PM
I'll definitely make an I.rex set somewhere along the line, when I've got more damned time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 23, 2015, 07:58:47 PM
New clip. More action based this time  :)

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=911250618919822&id=170889472955944&fs=8
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 23, 2015, 08:02:48 PM

Quote from: Omegazilla on Apr 23, 2015, 07:46:28 PM
I'll definitely make an I.rex set somewhere along the line, when I've got more damned time.

And more pictures, I'd imagine. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Apr 23, 2015, 09:19:17 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Apr 23, 2015, 07:58:47 PM
New clip. More action based this time  :)

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=911250618919822&id=170889472955944&fs=8


horrible quality, we cant complain about the cgi atm :D

Spoiler
btw Masrani is an ass thats a bit of spoiler
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2015, 09:35:15 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Apr 23, 2015, 06:07:40 PM
God, Doom finally changed his profile picture. Cheers.

Keep Calm...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Apr 23, 2015, 09:36:42 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Apr 23, 2015, 07:58:47 PM
New clip. More action based this time  :)

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=911250618919822&id=170889472955944&fs=8
better quality of the clip can be found on twitter.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 23, 2015, 10:51:19 PM
Quote from: szkoki on Apr 23, 2015, 09:19:17 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Apr 23, 2015, 07:58:47 PM
New clip. More action based this time  :)

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=911250618919822&id=170889472955944&fs=8


horrible quality, we cant complain about the cgi atm :D

Spoiler
btw Masrani is an ass thats a bit of spoiler
[close]
Most of the cgi is fantastic from what I've seen. Specially the raptors. The couple shots that looked iffy to me are the Gallimimus and the fallen Brachiosaurs or whatever species of long neck that was.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Apr 23, 2015, 11:14:39 PM
Apatosaurus aka Brontosaurus and thanks for the clip, probably i would missed it


here is the 720p indeed http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPmFkZjAPc8#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPmFkZjAPc8#ws)


screw the topic just watch it for the screenshots

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aP3tC9_zzNA#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aP3tC9_zzNA#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 23, 2015, 11:30:46 PM
Quote from: szkoki on Apr 23, 2015, 11:14:39 PM
Apatosaurus aka Brontosaurus and thanks for the clip, probably i would missed it


here is the 720p indeed http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPmFkZjAPc8#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPmFkZjAPc8#ws)


screw the topic just watch it for the screenshots

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aP3tC9_zzNA#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aP3tC9_zzNA#ws)
I've been trying to not stare too intently to the trailers so yeah wasn't sure which of them it was  :laugh: I hear Brontosaurus is back in the realm of dinosaurs too.

And yeah no problem. I didn't even realize how bad the quality is because I kinda glaze my eyes while watching the trailers xD
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 23, 2015, 11:38:02 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RC1pVtBP7A#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RC1pVtBP7A#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Apr 24, 2015, 12:22:23 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FChsk6jgB9ck%2Fhqdefault.jpg&hash=6bf3d6e8480aedbd6421f30be0f0f3ec2762c370)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Apr 24, 2015, 12:43:22 AM
Quote from: szkoki on Apr 24, 2015, 12:22:23 AM
http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Chsk6jgB9ck/hqdefault.jpg
whats that from? plus that clip felt very jurassic parky!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HappyAlien on Apr 24, 2015, 02:01:47 AM
This looks like the best one since the 1993 original. Plus its got Chris Pratt who was great in Guardians so I will be going to see this.
I still can't believe how good the original film looks it holds up much better than a lot of late 90's and early 2000's films with bad CGI like the Phantom Menace. Its aged so well like Empire Strikes Back and Alien.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Apr 24, 2015, 03:07:38 AM
The whole thing looks like a big predictable cliche to me.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYAUUvUoGqY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYAUUvUoGqY#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxpFcV1RZeA#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxpFcV1RZeA#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HappyAlien on Apr 24, 2015, 03:36:09 AM
Quote from: Hubbs on Apr 24, 2015, 03:07:38 AM
The whole thing looks like a big predictable cliche to me.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYAUUvUoGqY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYAUUvUoGqY#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxpFcV1RZeA#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxpFcV1RZeA#ws)
Oliver Harper's my favourite reviewer of films on YouTube. Does such good reviews and a lot of good 80's and early 90's films. he will be doing Alien and Aliens soon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Apr 24, 2015, 07:43:45 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2015, 09:35:15 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Apr 23, 2015, 06:07:40 PM
God, Doom finally changed his profile picture. Cheers.

Keep Calm...

Urassic Worl

:P

Nice avatar.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Apr 24, 2015, 07:45:23 AM
i dont expect anyyhing but what the plot and teailers promise: great action, more dinos.

And the movie isnt want to be more than it is so far at least unlike Prometheus. No more let down for me this time

Quote from: Hubbs on Apr 24, 2015, 03:07:38 AM
The whole thing looks like a big predictable cliche to me.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYAUUvUoGqY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYAUUvUoGqY#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxpFcV1RZeA#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxpFcV1RZeA#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Apr 24, 2015, 07:55:10 AM
Quote from: HappyAlien on Apr 24, 2015, 02:01:47 AMI still can't believe how good the original film looks it holds up much better than a lot of late 90's and early 2000's films with bad CGI like the Phantom Menace.

Because they didn't go over-the-top with it. They did what they knew they could do to the best of their ability and no more, and the CGI simply compliments the film rather than dominates it. Same as with Terminator 2.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Apr 24, 2015, 08:00:14 AM
Quote from: frenchfries on Apr 24, 2015, 12:43:22 AM
Quote from: szkoki on Apr 24, 2015, 12:22:23 AM
http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Chsk6jgB9ck/hqdefault.jpg
whats that from? plus that clip felt very jurassic parky!!

These names were mentioned in the podcast i posted then i found this pic ..we will see if its in the movie or just fan made. I would like that if the raptors would have different personality tbh.

eg Echo and Delta looks pretty the same so they are just following the  others. Blue or Charlie has to be the leader of the pack. Its probably Charlie since we dont see her in the scene where Owen stops the raptors. Probably Charlie went nuts there, Owen tranqulized her and the others came to her rescue. It is mentioned in the podcast that Charlie has a scar in her face so probably she is a veteran too...maybe an old raptor.

Hope its not the one Tim locked in:D that one wasnt badass at all.



Guys what do you think about the different flora in the  clips? In JP the island wasa vintage central american landscape. In Lost Word Sorna was like the Rockey Mountain. Then again Sorna in JP3 became tropical. Now its completly different, in some scenes is tropical but look at the t rex paddock its LW all over. Bit weirdm

Still no spoilers about the restricted area so thats a wooohooo. Maybe the raptors just pretend to be friends so they can get to the males there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Apr 24, 2015, 08:05:20 AM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Apr 24, 2015, 07:55:10 AM
Quote from: HappyAlien on Apr 24, 2015, 02:01:47 AMI still can't believe how good the original film looks it holds up much better than a lot of late 90's and early 2000's films with bad CGI like the Phantom Menace.

Because they didn't go over-the-top with it. They did what they knew they could do to the best of their ability and no more, and the CGI simply compliments the film rather than dominates it. Same as with Terminator 2.

I think Starship Troopers (the original) holds up incredibly well now a days too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Apr 24, 2015, 08:17:56 AM
Good call. I didn't mean to imply Jurassic Park and T2 were the only examples of good 90s CGI, but it's true there aren't that many of them :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Apr 24, 2015, 08:38:06 AM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Apr 24, 2015, 07:55:10 AM
Quote from: HappyAlien on Apr 24, 2015, 02:01:47 AMI still can't believe how good the original film looks it holds up much better than a lot of late 90's and early 2000's films with bad CGI like the Phantom Menace.

Because they didn't go over-the-top with it. They did what they knew they could do to the best of their ability and no more, and the CGI simply compliments the film rather than dominates it. Same as with Terminator 2.

What they could do was very limited at that time (and they used those limitations VERY well!) compaired to what we have today. Were they made in this day and age i'm sure they would be over the top action packaged as the rest of the movies these days... unfortunatly.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.marinaboards.com%2Fpublic%2Fstyle_emoticons%2Fdefault%2FW7BhGl2.png&hash=6c72fe99e1986fc8c1db2b675cafef54bdc439d7)

Today they are also doing what they can do to the best of their ability in terms of action and CGI (although some CGI still looks so fake compaired to JP, Starship Troopers, T2),  im hoping for some character development along the way, I doubt that this movie will offer that as much as JP and TLW did with their characters.  "Adventure and action" movies these days are soley focussing on the action rather then good character development along the way, like T2 and JP for example had.

But needless to say, im excited to watch this movie and I believe it will be a great sequel in the series, it will be great to finally see a fully "working" park with visitors and dinosaurs and other dinosaur species. I'm really hoping that they will show what's left of the "old" park (the Velociraptor on the tour car hinted such a scenario on the teaser poster).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 24, 2015, 11:19:18 AM
Quote from: szkoki on Apr 23, 2015, 11:14:39 PM
Apatosaurus aka Brontosaurus and thanks for the clip, probably i would missed it

Sorry to be pedantic, but not aka. They're two different species.

Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Apr 24, 2015, 07:43:45 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 23, 2015, 09:35:15 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Apr 23, 2015, 06:07:40 PM
God, Doom finally changed his profile picture. Cheers.

Keep Calm...

Urassic Worl

:P

Nice avatar.

LOL just the way it's cropped.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Apr 24, 2015, 12:08:41 PM
i thought Brontosaurus didnt even exist and paleontologist only got confused by two different sauropods remains found in the same spot. and apatosaurus looks the closest to Bronto
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 24, 2015, 12:14:56 PM
A new revision of the sauropod skeleton at the Peabody Museum has confirmed (for now, at least) that that specimen in particular is in fact Brontosaurus. All the other Apatosaurus skeletons around the world are still Apatosaurus. It's just the one that's been renamed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 24, 2015, 09:00:48 PM
Quote from: szkoki on Apr 24, 2015, 12:08:41 PM
i thought Brontosaurus didnt even exist and paleontologist only got confused by two different sauropods remains found in the same spot. and apatosaurus looks the closest to Bronto

What Doom said. Don't worry, this just happened this past week. Brand new development.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Apr 24, 2015, 09:47:20 PM
read an interview recently where the director has said:
"one common criticism leveled against the movie prior to a frame of film being shot, was why should a fourth Jurassic park film exist? 'its so that a giant corporation can make a ton of money whether its a good idea or not' he offers matter-of-factly. 'i felt like, okay maybe we can make a movie about that'. "

pretty cool that they will explore that theme with the hybrid dinosaur.   
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Apr 24, 2015, 10:09:05 PM
Quote from: frenchfries on Apr 24, 2015, 09:47:20 PM
read an interview recently where the director has said:
"one common criticism leveled against the movie prior to a frame of film being shot, was why should a fourth Jurassic park film exist? 'its so that a giant corporation can make a ton of money whether its a good idea or not' he offers matter-of-factly. 'i felt like, okay maybe we can make a movie about that'. "

pretty cool that they will explore that theme with the hybrid dinosaur.   
I love the irony in that it is indeed giant corporations that will make a ton of money about a movie featuring a dinosaur park. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 24, 2015, 10:59:06 PM
Quote from: frenchfries on Apr 24, 2015, 09:47:20 PM
read an interview recently where the director has said:
"one common criticism leveled against the movie prior to a frame of film being shot, was why should a fourth Jurassic park film exist? 'its so that a giant corporation can make a ton of money whether its a good idea or not' he offers matter-of-factly. 'i felt like, okay maybe we can make a movie about that'. "

pretty cool that they will explore that theme with the hybrid dinosaur.   

Nice  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Apr 24, 2015, 11:28:19 PM
its also cool to note that this movie will explore our current society.(also talked about in the interview)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 25, 2015, 08:36:44 AM
Quote from: frenchfries on Apr 24, 2015, 09:47:20 PM
read an interview recently where the director has said:
"one common criticism leveled against the movie prior to a frame of film being shot, was why should a fourth Jurassic park film exist? 'its so that a giant corporation can make a ton of money whether its a good idea or not' he offers matter-of-factly. 'i felt like, okay maybe we can make a movie about that'. "

pretty cool that they will explore that theme with the hybrid dinosaur.   

Not to mention the Hybrid dinosaur is a metaphor for the Spinosaurus from JP3. Corporate wanted a bigger, badder dino for the third film to replace their most popular attraction, the T-rex. Then the reaction to the movie was a backlash of negativity and the film didn't bring home the bacon. It bit them in the ass, which is what the hybrid will do in the new movie.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdBsdyaL8wY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdBsdyaL8wY#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Apr 25, 2015, 09:38:20 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 25, 2015, 08:36:44 AM
Quote from: frenchfries on Apr 24, 2015, 09:47:20 PM
read an interview recently where the director has said:
"one common criticism leveled against the movie prior to a frame of film being shot, was why should a fourth Jurassic park film exist? 'its so that a giant corporation can make a ton of money whether its a good idea or not' he offers matter-of-factly. 'i felt like, okay maybe we can make a movie about that'. "

pretty cool that they will explore that theme with the hybrid dinosaur.   

Not to mention the Hybrid dinosaur is a metaphor for the Spinosaurus from JP3. Corporate wanted a bigger, badder dino for the third film to replace their most popular attraction, the T-rex. Then the reaction to the movie was a backlash of negativity and the film didn't bring home the bacon. It bite them in the ass, which is what the hybrid will do in the new movie.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdBsdyaL8wY (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdBsdyaL8wY)
this movie just gets better and better.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 26, 2015, 08:08:58 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 25, 2015, 08:36:44 AM
Quote from: frenchfries on Apr 24, 2015, 09:47:20 PM
read an interview recently where the director has said:
"one common criticism leveled against the movie prior to a frame of film being shot, was why should a fourth Jurassic park film exist? 'its so that a giant corporation can make a ton of money whether its a good idea or not' he offers matter-of-factly. 'i felt like, okay maybe we can make a movie about that'. "

pretty cool that they will explore that theme with the hybrid dinosaur.   

Not to mention the Hybrid dinosaur is a metaphor for the Spinosaurus from JP3. Corporate wanted a bigger, badder dino for the third film to replace their most popular attraction, the T-rex. Then the reaction to the movie was a backlash of negativity and the film didn't bring home the bacon. It bit them in the ass, which is what the hybrid will do in the new movie.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdBsdyaL8wY#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdBsdyaL8wY#ws)

I'm glad Universal listened.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQJhbD4kCHo#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQJhbD4kCHo#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gazz on Apr 27, 2015, 11:28:41 AM
Latest issue of Empire has a cover that prominently features the new dino. It's the best official look we've had of it yet (face on). I imagine it'll be released in the next 24 hours.

EDIT: Here's a view of the outer cover:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.empireonline.com%2Fimages%2Fimage_index%2Fhw800%2F90710.jpg&hash=775cf3b6f097d8fbfea1844000e440949427de4d)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 27, 2015, 01:42:09 PM
"Dino thriller hits it out of the park."

Did they see an early screening?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 27, 2015, 03:06:54 PM
Empire seems like a pretty big name in the entertainment world so if they say it's good, that's encouraging.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 27, 2015, 03:11:02 PM
I'm just hoping that's what it means and that it's not just word play. Meaning that although it's a sequel it's departed from the "Park" style.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 27, 2015, 04:45:03 PM
I'm a subscriber, got my issue this morning. There's no review yet, but a massive article on the film with lots of stills (including behind the scenes shots) that I haven't seen before. Haven't read it properly yet.

I'd be shocked if the Empire review is below four stars when it arrives though, they're basically a bunch of big kids and very favourably inclined towards big franchises.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: reecebomb on Apr 27, 2015, 05:10:10 PM
I they went a little overboard with teal and orange look, makes the dinos seem much less realistic. Jurassic Park had life like colours and it worked fine, this isn't Transformers.
 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Apr 27, 2015, 05:40:48 PM
Quote from: reecebomb on Apr 27, 2015, 05:10:10 PM
I they went a little overboard with teal and orange look, makes the dinos seem much less realistic. Jurassic Park had life like colours and it worked fine, this isn't Transformers.
 
those colors seemed gone in those two clips they released so im guessing they are still working on the tint.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 27, 2015, 06:00:42 PM
Quote from: reecebomb on Apr 27, 2015, 05:10:10 PM
I they went a little overboard with teal and orange look, makes the dinos seem much less realistic. Jurassic Park had life like colours and it worked fine, this isn't Transformers.


I disagree. New research is highlighting that dinosaurs might have been multicoloured instead of the dull and drab greys and greens we're used to seeing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: reecebomb on Apr 27, 2015, 06:14:52 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 27, 2015, 06:00:42 PM
Quote from: reecebomb on Apr 27, 2015, 05:10:10 PM
I they went a little overboard with teal and orange look, makes the dinos seem much less realistic. Jurassic Park had life like colours and it worked fine, this isn't Transformers.


I disagree. New research is highlighting that dinosaurs might have been multicoloured instead of the dull and drab greys and greens we're used to seeing.

I meant the gereral look of the film (colour grading), not the colour of the dinosaurs. I just wish the look was similar to the first films, other than that the film could be fun at this point, but im not holding my breath.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 27, 2015, 06:20:14 PM
After having a solid look at the Indominus Rex, I have to say, I'm really digging the carnosaurian design it has. It's almost like a devilish Carcharodontosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 27, 2015, 06:25:58 PM

Quote from: reecebomb on Apr 27, 2015, 05:10:10 PM
I they went a little overboard with teal and orange look, makes the dinos seem much less realistic. Jurassic Park had life like colours and it worked fine, this isn't Transformers.


It is, however, a vain attempt to milk money from a franchise that very probably should be left alone, very much like what the Transformers movie series has become, and they're both even by the same studio.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Apr 27, 2015, 06:40:50 PM
Spoiler
Is that an animatronic dino in the magazine?
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 27, 2015, 06:58:52 PM
Quote from: predxeno on Apr 27, 2015, 06:25:58 PM

Quote from: reecebomb on Apr 27, 2015, 05:10:10 PM
I they went a little overboard with teal and orange look, makes the dinos seem much less realistic. Jurassic Park had life like colours and it worked fine, this isn't Transformers.


It is, however, a vain attempt to milk money from a franchise that very probably should be left alone, very much like what the Transformers movie series has become, and they're both even by the same studio.

Which film series' forum are you using, again?  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 27, 2015, 07:23:58 PM
Wish I could change my vote from "Looking forward to it" to "Extremely." Lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Apr 27, 2015, 08:45:26 PM
Quote from: predxeno on Apr 27, 2015, 06:25:58 PM

Quote from: reecebomb on Apr 27, 2015, 05:10:10 PM
I they went a little overboard with teal and orange look, makes the dinos seem much less realistic. Jurassic Park had life like colours and it worked fine, this isn't Transformers.


It is, however, a vain attempt to milk money from a franchise that very probably should be left alone, very much like what the Transformers movie series has become, and they're both even by the same studio.
thats a pretty big assumption on your part. like i said before the tint seemed gone in those clips that they released.
Title: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 27, 2015, 08:52:44 PM
The first film was released in 1993, the second was released in 1997, and the third came out in 2001, meaning each movie had a 4 year difference between them.  Fans have been wanting a 4th film for quite awhile but they never got it; Jurassic World comes out in 2015 which is over a decade from the last film and it coincides with the new Terminator reboot which is also released by the same studio, that's quite the coincidence.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gazz on Apr 27, 2015, 10:27:30 PM
The inner cover:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FJb33qNx.jpg&hash=392c5a8a0aabdc41895cc652b65857e0d101c39c)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Apr 27, 2015, 10:32:04 PM
Quote from: predxeno on Apr 27, 2015, 08:52:44 PM
The first film was released in 1993, the second was released in 1997, and the third came out in 2001, meaning each movie had a 4 year difference between them.  Fans have been wanting a 4th film for quite awhile but they never got it; Jurassic World comes out in 2015 which is over a decade from the last film and it coincides with the new Terminator reboot which is also released by the same studio, that's quite the coincidence.
I was wondering why terminator genisys also went with a warmer orange lighting instead of the cold blue of the original movie. However if both these movie are from the studio... mystery solved I guess.

Quote from: Gazz on Apr 27, 2015, 10:27:30 PM
The inner cover:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FJb33qNx.jpg&hash=392c5a8a0aabdc41895cc652b65857e0d101c39c)
I have to be honest, I'm really digging this dinosaurs design.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Apr 27, 2015, 10:37:58 PM
It looks pretty evil in that picture.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Apr 27, 2015, 10:46:26 PM
Looks like a demon from green hell  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on Apr 27, 2015, 10:47:29 PM
It's most likeley just a really really good rendering. But do you guys think it's an actual set photo/animatronic? I really can't tell. But then again it's most likely just really good cgi. It looks so real though  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Apr 27, 2015, 11:13:34 PM
it was confirmed on twitter by ILM that it is in fact a cgi render created for the magazine.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on Apr 27, 2015, 11:14:05 PM
Confirmed to be a render by ILM.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Foi60.tinypic.com%2F30uxudj.jpg&hash=02111b8d7375bb6ece178cc5a9c564e1a5e0f55d)

Quote from: frenchfries on Apr 27, 2015, 11:13:34 PM
it was confirmed on twitter by ILM that it is in fact a cgi render created for the magazine.

Ah didn't see your comment there. But it is amazing work by ILM. looks great  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 27, 2015, 11:27:20 PM
Spoiler tag the I-Rex please? I almost saw it ;-;
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 27, 2015, 11:42:15 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fb2YITvN.jpg&hash=0d9377482c9bab7a01d23f002c990c07a496c814)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FH3xw0WI.jpg&hash=b76e5f52c97702f291012d794895e8444c8f6329)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F1duZvX5.jpg&hash=165a0082bf27e552fc042402a7857bb80f5128ac)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FzPLJn5s.jpg&hash=62e73a09120899ec4d9e3691abe2b227a83b5e6e)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 28, 2015, 01:18:06 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Apr 27, 2015, 11:42:15 PM

http://i.imgur.com/H3xw0WI.jpg


Star-Lord v Kingpin: Dawn of Dinos
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Apr 28, 2015, 02:12:16 AM
Just make Cadillacs and Dinosaurs the movie already, this is practically there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Apr 28, 2015, 02:21:24 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.thelisticles.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F10%2F140.jpg&hash=0cfacce0da70d9453ef6a7a4a635161cf933783f)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Apr 28, 2015, 03:02:33 AM
Quote from: Hubbs on Apr 28, 2015, 02:12:16 AM
Just make Cadillacs and Dinosaurs the movie already, this is practically there.
thats really reaching dude.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Apr 28, 2015, 03:14:50 AM
Quote from: frenchfries on Apr 28, 2015, 03:02:33 AM
Quote from: Hubbs on Apr 28, 2015, 02:12:16 AM
Just make Cadillacs and Dinosaurs the movie already, this is practically there.
thats really reaching dude.

I feel so nostalgic now :'(

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gr2iQ96em2w#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gr2iQ96em2w#ws)

Also Mad Max with dinosaurs 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 28, 2015, 04:20:37 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Apr 27, 2015, 11:42:15 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fb2YITvN.jpg&hash=0d9377482c9bab7a01d23f002c990c07a496c814)

http://i.imgur.com/H3xw0WI.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/1duZvX5.jpg

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FzPLJn5s.jpg&hash=62e73a09120899ec4d9e3691abe2b227a83b5e6e)
That first image is a little too Grant and Sattler with the kids in the original, when the raptors attack and the Rex intervenes.

That shot of the raptors looking up looks great  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Invader on Apr 28, 2015, 05:10:07 AM
Don't remember Cadillacs and Dinosaurs, but I watched Dino Riders as a kid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Apr 28, 2015, 07:05:28 AM
I'm not really fond of the Blue and Green colors of the raptos, they look quite... fake, imo. Aside of that, everything else looks amazing!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 28, 2015, 07:08:59 AM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on Apr 28, 2015, 07:05:28 AM
I'm not really fond of the Blue and Green colors of the raptos, they look quite... fake, imo.

Quote from: reecebomb on Apr 27, 2015, 05:10:10 PM
I they went a little overboard with teal and orange look, makes the dinos seem much less realistic. Jurassic Park had life like colours and it worked fine, this isn't Transformers.

The original wasn't perfect.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CDp_RfHWAAEkPqD.png)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Apr 28, 2015, 07:21:43 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 28, 2015, 07:08:59 AM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on Apr 28, 2015, 07:05:28 AM
I'm not really fond of the Blue and Green colors of the raptos, they look quite... fake, imo.

Quote from: reecebomb on Apr 27, 2015, 05:10:10 PM
I they went a little overboard with teal and orange look, makes the dinos seem much less realistic. Jurassic Park had life like colours and it worked fine, this isn't Transformers.

The original wasn't perfect.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CDp_RfHWAAEkPqD.png

I really believe the original JP (and maybe TLW as well) had indeed more life like colours as reecebomb stated as well. It's such an unnessecary change. Maybe they should have tweaked the contrast a little more, the colours look too "intense" now, which make them a little fake imo. Especially the blue one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 28, 2015, 07:36:22 AM
The trailers have a different colour grading when compared to the clips. No worries.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 28, 2015, 12:44:06 PM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on Apr 28, 2015, 07:21:43 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 28, 2015, 07:08:59 AM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on Apr 28, 2015, 07:05:28 AM
I'm not really fond of the Blue and Green colors of the raptos, they look quite... fake, imo.

Quote from: reecebomb on Apr 27, 2015, 05:10:10 PM
I they went a little overboard with teal and orange look, makes the dinos seem much less realistic. Jurassic Park had life like colours and it worked fine, this isn't Transformers.

The original wasn't perfect.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CDp_RfHWAAEkPqD.png

I really believe the original JP (and maybe TLW as well) had indeed more life like colours as reecebomb stated as well. It's such an unnessecary change. Maybe they should have tweaked the contrast a little more, the colours look too "intense" now, which make them a little fake imo. Especially the blue one.
No no. Everything was brown. Although it didn't affect the movie for me that much, whenever I would see it and I'd see all the brown raptors, it just seemed so unlikely. And the Rex the same shade of brown too, almost. But even within the same species, I didn't think they would all be exactly the same brown. Maybe not a blue color like Blue's, but the colors are acceptable to me. It's in the other end of the spectrum, but I prefer that to the original colors. And I like the individuality it gives them.

TLW had a nice middle ground though. At least, in the concept art.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Wrecktangle on Apr 28, 2015, 01:18:40 PM
Dinosaurs of the rainbow
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 28, 2015, 01:50:34 PM
Quote from: Wrecktangle on Apr 28, 2015, 01:18:40 PM
Dinosaurs of the rainbow
Not so hard to process when you consider they're the ancestors of birds. They need the plumage, but oh well I can dig it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 28, 2015, 02:53:17 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Apr 28, 2015, 01:50:34 PM
Quote from: Wrecktangle on Apr 28, 2015, 01:18:40 PM
Dinosaurs of the rainbow
Not so hard to process when you consider they're the ancestors of birds. They need the plumage, but oh well I can dig it.

Thank you. At least they're halfway there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Apr 28, 2015, 05:23:39 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 28, 2015, 07:08:59 AM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on Apr 28, 2015, 07:05:28 AM
I'm not really fond of the Blue and Green colors of the raptos, they look quite... fake, imo.

Quote from: reecebomb on Apr 27, 2015, 05:10:10 PM
I they went a little overboard with teal and orange look, makes the dinos seem much less realistic. Jurassic Park had life like colours and it worked fine, this isn't Transformers.

The original wasn't perfect.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CDp_RfHWAAEkPqD.png
i like how people will still say that the cgi in the original is better  ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 28, 2015, 05:49:41 PM
It's an overreaction to unfinished renders. People need to cry.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on Apr 28, 2015, 06:00:58 PM
The thing is that the trailers are mostly overlapped with trailer music, without any of the final sound design. I mean the sound design is a major part of the creatures coming to life. The cgi can be less good but if the sound design is amazing, it makes up for it. Jurassic Park wouldn't be what it is without that amazing sound design. the roar of the t.rex and the sounds of dinosaurs walking etc etc. A lot of people seem to forget this and purely judge on the visual aspect.

Slashfilm set visit that has a part in it that even makes me more excited for this movie!!

Spoiler
We visited another set which is the remains of the old visitors center from the original Jurassic Park. This was probably the coolest set we saw as it felt like I was stepping into the same location from the first film. Years have gone by, and the visitors set has been completely abandoned. Greenery has completely taken over, and the bones of the T-Rex lay on the floor as do the dirty scraps of the banner, which we were told play into this story. Vines are growing around a piece of the scaffolding we saw in the first film. The stairs are overgrown with tree branches, vines and grass. The iconic doors are rusted and vines have taken over the archway entrance. The old visitors center is located in a part of the park which has dinosaurs roaming free. The boys stumble upon this location somewhere in the middle of the movie.
[close]

http://www.slashfilm.com/jurassic-world-set-visit/ (http://www.slashfilm.com/jurassic-world-set-visit/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Apr 28, 2015, 07:13:18 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on Apr 28, 2015, 06:00:58 PM
The thing is that the trailers are mostly overlapped with trailer music, without any of the final sound design. I mean the sound design is a major part of the creatures coming to life. The cgi can be less good but if the sound design is amazing, it makes up for it. Jurassic Park wouldn't be what it is without that amazing sound design. the roar of the t.rex and the sounds of dinosaurs walking etc etc. A lot of people seem to forget this and purely judge on the visual aspect.

Slashfilm set visit that has a part in it that even makes me more excited for this movie!!

Spoiler
We visited another set which is the remains of the old visitors center from the original Jurassic Park. This was probably the coolest set we saw as it felt like I was stepping into the same location from the first film. Years have gone by, and the visitors set has been completely abandoned. Greenery has completely taken over, and the bones of the T-Rex lay on the floor as do the dirty scraps of the banner, which we were told play into this story. Vines are growing around a piece of the scaffolding we saw in the first film. The stairs are overgrown with tree branches, vines and grass. The iconic doors are rusted and vines have taken over the archway entrance. The old visitors center is located in a part of the park which has dinosaurs roaming free. The boys stumble upon this location somewhere in the middle of the movie.
[close]

http://www.slashfilm.com/jurassic-world-set-visit/ (http://www.slashfilm.com/jurassic-world-set-visit/)

Totally loving this! Cant wait for this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bender1988 on Apr 28, 2015, 09:02:55 PM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on Apr 28, 2015, 07:13:18 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on Apr 28, 2015, 06:00:58 PM
The thing is that the trailers are mostly overlapped with trailer music, without any of the final sound design. I mean the sound design is a major part of the creatures coming to life. The cgi can be less good but if the sound design is amazing, it makes up for it. Jurassic Park wouldn't be what it is without that amazing sound design. the roar of the t.rex and the sounds of dinosaurs walking etc etc. A lot of people seem to forget this and purely judge on the visual aspect.

Slashfilm set visit that has a part in it that even makes me more excited for this movie!!

Spoiler
We visited another set which is the remains of the old visitors center from the original Jurassic Park. This was probably the coolest set we saw as it felt like I was stepping into the same location from the first film. Years have gone by, and the visitors set has been completely abandoned. Greenery has completely taken over, and the bones of the T-Rex lay on the floor as do the dirty scraps of the banner, which we were told play into this story. Vines are growing around a piece of the scaffolding we saw in the first film. The stairs are overgrown with tree branches, vines and grass. The iconic doors are rusted and vines have taken over the archway entrance. The old visitors center is located in a part of the park which has dinosaurs roaming free. The boys stumble upon this location somewhere in the middle of the movie.
[close]

http://www.slashfilm.com/jurassic-world-set-visit/ (http://www.slashfilm.com/jurassic-world-set-visit/)

Totally loving this! Cant wait for this.
same here
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 29, 2015, 10:41:37 AM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on Apr 28, 2015, 07:21:43 AMI really believe the original JP (and maybe TLW as well) had indeed more life like colours as reecebomb stated as well. It's such an unnessecary change. Maybe they should have tweaked the contrast a little more, the colours look too "intense" now, which make them a little fake imo. Especially the blue one.

I hate to break it to you, but if you want life-like raptors, the colours are extremely low on the list of things to complain about.
Looks like there's a good reason for making the colours so vibrant and distinct - it's so that each raptor can be easily distinguished from each other. They're even going to far as to name each of them in the pre-release material, so I think the audience is supposed to see them as distinct individuals.


:edit: Should say, I'm getting pretty excited about JW. It's not exactly what I wanted, but could turn out to be the most fun film in a year filled with blockbuster franchises. The set report in Empire is full of good things.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 29, 2015, 12:53:53 PM
Wow, if you're becoming excited, then Colin is really doing something right ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Apr 29, 2015, 05:38:30 PM
apparently these raptors had bird dna mixed into them.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 29, 2015, 07:23:36 PM
Wait, really?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Apr 29, 2015, 07:47:48 PM
http://uproxx.com/gammasquad/2015/04/jurassic-world-will-ignore-the-events-of-the-lost-world-and-jurassic-park-iii/ (http://uproxx.com/gammasquad/2015/04/jurassic-world-will-ignore-the-events-of-the-lost-world-and-jurassic-park-iii/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Apr 29, 2015, 07:52:01 PM
Lame. The Lost World is awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 29, 2015, 07:56:57 PM
It's a sensationalist article that misinterprets some words. Nothing to worry about. The article it references on Yahoo movies says that, "According to Trevorrow, the previous sequels aren't being written out of continuity so much as placed to the side, as they both unfolded on a different island."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Apr 29, 2015, 08:08:27 PM
probably there will be no mention about them. its cool, i dont even care honestly
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 29, 2015, 11:03:31 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Apr 29, 2015, 07:56:57 PM
It's a sensationalist article that misinterprets some words. Nothing to worry about. The article it references on Yahoo movies says that, "According to Trevorrow, the previous sequels aren't being written out of continuity so much as placed to the side, as they both unfolded on a different island."

God everybody is running with the sensational version of the story everywhere.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 30, 2015, 12:36:08 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Apr 29, 2015, 07:56:57 PM
It's a sensationalist article that misinterprets some words. Nothing to worry about. The article it references on Yahoo movies says that, "According to Trevorrow, the previous sequels aren't being written out of continuity so much as placed to the side, as they both unfolded on a different island."

I think we all figured this would happen when we heard the movie was taking place on Nublar rather than Sorna.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 30, 2015, 12:37:24 AM
based on this article: http://www.slashfilm.com/jurassic-world-performance-capture/#more-292064 (http://www.slashfilm.com/jurassic-world-performance-capture/#more-292064)

They used a lot of motion capture for the dinosaurs instead of CGI.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on Apr 30, 2015, 01:24:42 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOiT21DALrE (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOiT21DALrE)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 30, 2015, 05:00:12 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Apr 30, 2015, 12:37:24 AM
based on this article: http://www.slashfilm.com/jurassic-world-performance-capture/#more-292064 (http://www.slashfilm.com/jurassic-world-performance-capture/#more-292064)

They used a lot of motion capture for the dinosaurs instead of CGI.
Motion Capture is a technique to animate CGI... perhaps you mean Key-frame.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Apr 30, 2015, 05:16:52 AM
Quote from: Snowdog on Apr 30, 2015, 01:24:42 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOiT21DALrE (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOiT21DALrE)
happy to see Steven Speilberg talk about the movie  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 30, 2015, 11:15:15 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Apr 29, 2015, 07:56:57 PM
It's a sensationalist article that misinterprets some words. Nothing to worry about. The article it references on Yahoo movies says that, "According to Trevorrow, the previous sequels aren't being written out of continuity so much as placed to the side, as they both unfolded on a different island."

Thanks for pointing that out. Not mentioning Site B seems odd. They still need a place to breed the dinosaurs until they're park-ready.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 30, 2015, 12:31:32 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 30, 2015, 11:15:15 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Apr 29, 2015, 07:56:57 PM
It's a sensationalist article that misinterprets some words. Nothing to worry about. The article it references on Yahoo movies says that, "According to Trevorrow, the previous sequels aren't being written out of continuity so much as placed to the side, as they both unfolded on a different island."

Thanks for pointing that out. Not mentioning Site B seems odd. They still need a place to breed the dinosaurs until they're park-ready.

I don't know I think think they don't really need a Site B but maybe just another part of the Island.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 30, 2015, 12:36:57 PM
That might explain the section marked, "Restricted Area".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Apr 30, 2015, 12:47:27 PM
the restricted are isnt the part of the island where dinos live free from 1st movie?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Apr 30, 2015, 12:53:40 PM
The restricted area is where all of the human generated monsters live. Who knows what else they were up too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 30, 2015, 01:04:04 PM
Quote from: szkoki on Apr 30, 2015, 12:47:27 PM
the restricted are isnt the part of the island where dinos live free from 1st movie?

If we're lucky. Hopefully that means Dilophosaurus makes a return!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Apr 30, 2015, 02:15:19 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 30, 2015, 01:04:04 PM
Quote from: szkoki on Apr 30, 2015, 12:47:27 PM
the restricted are isnt the part of the island where dinos live free from 1st movie?

If we're lucky. Hopefully that means Dilophosaurus makes a return!
I know  :'( Pls Trevorrow
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Apr 30, 2015, 02:20:42 PM
Dilopho, old visitors centre, wild raptors will make appearance rumors says...well we will see what they didnt show in the trailers
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 30, 2015, 02:21:34 PM
Looks like Papo had their own ideas for a Hybrid Rex toy a few years back.

http://dinodan.proboards.com/thread/6494/new-2006-prototypes-jp4-inspired (http://dinodan.proboards.com/thread/6494/new-2006-prototypes-jp4-inspired)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Apr 30, 2015, 03:58:25 PM
Did anyone post that it's been confirmed the T-Rex in this movie is the same one from the original?

cuz thats awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Apr 30, 2015, 04:11:59 PM

Quote from: MudButt on Apr 30, 2015, 03:58:25 PM
Did anyone post that it's been confirmed the T-Rex in this movie is the same one from the original?

cuz thats awesome.

It's on the movie's viral site as advertising for the park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 30, 2015, 04:22:55 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Apr 30, 2015, 03:58:25 PM
Did anyone post that it's been confirmed the T-Rex in this movie is the same one from the original?

cuz thats awesome.

Yeah, Colin said so about a week ago. Makes perfect sense when you consider that this is Site A.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 30, 2015, 07:19:08 PM
Where is the direct quote from Trevorrow?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 30, 2015, 07:32:52 PM
http://www.slashfilm.com/colin-trevorrow-jurassic-world-interview/ (http://www.slashfilm.com/colin-trevorrow-jurassic-world-interview/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 30, 2015, 07:42:27 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Apr 30, 2015, 07:19:08 PM
Where is the direct quote from Trevorrow?

QuoteQuestion: I expected maybe there's a cameo–like, a human cameo of some kind. But, you mentioned earlier that there's a dinosaur that we have seen in the previous films that we're going to get to see. Can you talk a little bit about that?

Colin Trevorrow: The T-Rex that's in the film is the T-Rex from the original Jurassic Park and she is 22 years older. But, she's not limping around.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 30, 2015, 08:18:12 PM
Oh, awesome. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on Apr 30, 2015, 09:50:11 PM
New featurette with a first look at the new visitor center 8)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_MVwc0l01c (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_MVwc0l01c)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on May 01, 2015, 06:09:45 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 30, 2015, 07:42:27 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Apr 30, 2015, 07:19:08 PM
Where is the direct quote from Trevorrow?

QuoteQuestion: I expected maybe there's a cameo–like, a human cameo of some kind. But, you mentioned earlier that there's a dinosaur that we have seen in the previous films that we're going to get to see. Can you talk a little bit about that?

Colin Trevorrow: The T-Rex that's in the film is the T-Rex from the original Jurassic Park and she is 22 years older. But, she's not limping around.

When he says the "original T-Rex" is in the film, does he mean the original prop that the first movie used or does he mean a new prop just re-colored to look like the first one?  If it's the latter, then I still find the idea lame as hell, unless a) all the other dinos are also from the original movie or b) there's a specific plot reason why this is the case.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Keg on May 01, 2015, 06:29:04 AM
Its just the same T Rex that you saw in the first film. Whats so hard to understand or accept about that. I have no idea what the lifespan of a T Rex was but I would suspect its at least 50 years so this film being 20 or so years after the first film, it makes sense that its the same T Rex. Whether its been recaptured and out back in the park or its now a wild T Rex that lives on the island and not part of the park we'll just have to wait and see. We dont need a plot reason, it just is the same one.
Title: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on May 01, 2015, 06:36:59 AM
I can see why it would be the same T-Rex in the confines of the plot but pointing it out like this sounds just like an attempt to create fan hype.  If I said that the Stegosaurs seen in the trailer are the same Stegosaurs that existed offscreen in the first film, what kind of reaction would I have gotten then?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on May 01, 2015, 06:53:04 AM
Im really happy they are returning the same Tyrannosaurus from the first movie! (Which is what im looking forward to the most lol) I think she holds a special place in everyone's heart who loved the JP movies.

Also I've read the following:
"Trevorrow recently confirmed Jurassic World will be a direct sequel to Jurassic Park."

So does it completely ignore TLW? :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Keg on May 01, 2015, 07:01:36 AM
Oh for god sake not this again. Completely ignoring it doesn't mean it didn't happen. Predators pretty much completely ignores Predator 2 but that doesn't mean that film didn't happen. Its just not acknowledging it in any way so you can watch Jurassic Park followed by Jurassic World and not need any prior knowledge of the middle two films. Saying its a direct sequel to the first doesnt erase the other two. Doing something like what Blomkamp is doing with Alien however is something else entirely.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on May 01, 2015, 07:10:15 AM
Quote from: Keg on May 01, 2015, 07:01:36 AM
Oh for god sake not this again. Completely ignoring it doesn't mean it didn't happen. Predators pretty much completely ignores Predator 2 but that doesn't mean that film didn't happen. Its just not acknowledging it in any way so you can watch Jurassic Park followed by Jurassic World and not need any prior knowledge of the middle two films. Saying its a direct sequel to the first doesnt erase the other two. Doing something like what Blomkamp is doing with Alien however is something else entirely.

I know that, but I mean since it says it's a direct sequel to JP rather then just a sequel to the series I was merely wondering.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on May 01, 2015, 07:30:52 AM
Maybe look back a couple pages next time? You're not the only one to wonder
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on May 01, 2015, 07:40:21 AM
Quote from: Keg on May 01, 2015, 07:01:36 AMOh for god sake not this again. Completely ignoring it doesn't mean it didn't happen.

In fairness, that's not what Trevorrow said. He said it's a "direct sequel". The could quite easily mean it considers the intervening films null and void. Superman Returns did exactly that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on May 01, 2015, 07:48:54 AM
I've got this bad feeling that the Mosasaurs is going to catch the iRex off guard and drown the bitch.

Actually even worse, considering pratts gotta eat, gotta hunt, gotta f**k speech, and that the irex has trex DNA... the entire series of events is setup because the irex got really friggen horny.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 01, 2015, 10:10:31 AM
Quote from: predxeno on May 01, 2015, 06:36:59 AM
If I said that the Stegosaurs seen in the trailer are the same Stegosaurs that existed offscreen in the first film, what kind of reaction would I have gotten then?

You would get very strange looks because you might as well say, remember that lightbulb in the visitors centres toilets we never saw? Well its coming back for the 4th movie! Both the Stegosaurus and the lightbulb did nothing in the original movie so it would be pointless. The Tyrannosaurus is a different kettle of fish as it was a prominent character.

The idea behind the T-rex from the first film coming back is a mixture of constancy and fan service. Before Grant and co visited JP InGen moved animals from Site B to Nublar. one of which was the female Tyrannosaur. Now after the accident in the park she was free to rule the island for 12 or so years before Masrani turns up to build a new park. They recaptured her and now showcase her at the T-Rex kingdom.

What is not to like? 8)


Quote from: HuDaFuK on May 01, 2015, 07:40:21 AM
In fairness, that's not what Trevorrow said. He said it's a "direct sequel". The could quite easily mean it considers the intervening films null and void. Superman Returns did exactly that.


From http://www.masraniglobal.com/about/divisions/ingen/security/index.html (http://www.masraniglobal.com/about/divisions/ingen/security/index.html)

QuoteA seasoned security contractor, Vic Hoskins was involved in overseeing the infamous flying reptile "cleanup" operation over Canada in 2001. Due to the professionalism his team displayed, he was hired personally by Simon Masrani to re-develop InGen's Security Division, which helped oversee the protection of workers on Isla Nublar during Jurassic World's construction.

You don't need to watch 2 and 3 to understand 4 simple as that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on May 01, 2015, 11:01:23 AM
i dont know how to feel about if its true

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FWXtn-ua4opk%2Fhqdefault.jpg&hash=2f84857426becb129fd8a826ab839c1b760b8b0c)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc08.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2Ff%2F2015%2F020%2F6%2Fa%2Fjurassic_world__arlix_by_alien_psychopath-d8entor.png&hash=45f7968769242c8ac2ec3bd75c2f8713f6334dcd)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on May 01, 2015, 11:05:58 AM
Quote from: Keg on May 01, 2015, 07:01:36 AM
Oh for god sake not this again. Completely ignoring it doesn't mean it didn't happen.

To be a little bit more precise, it means it doesn't matter if it happened or not...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 01, 2015, 11:25:09 AM
https://www.yahoo.com/movies/watch-steven-spielberg-and-chris-pratt-talk-117775215122.html (https://www.yahoo.com/movies/watch-steven-spielberg-and-chris-pratt-talk-117775215122.html)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on May 01, 2015, 11:56:12 AM
too late  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on May 01, 2015, 12:55:13 PM

Quote from: Tangakkai on May 01, 2015, 11:05:58 AM
Quote from: Keg on May 01, 2015, 07:01:36 AM
Oh for god sake not this again. Completely ignoring it doesn't mean it didn't happen.

To be a little bit more precise, it means it doesn't matter if it happened or not...

People have been attempting to use this logic to invalidate the AVP movies so it would be no surprise if they do the same to the JP movies as well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on May 01, 2015, 12:57:43 PM
Quote from: predxeno on May 01, 2015, 12:55:13 PMPeople have been attempting to use this logic to invalidate the AVP movies so it would be no surprise if they do the same to the JP movies as well.

I thought people used the fact Prometheus pretty much retcons them to invalidate them? Peter Weyland =/= Charles Bishop Weyland.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on May 01, 2015, 12:59:39 PM
They use that pretty rarely actually since Prometheus is still a comparatively new movie, before it came out pissed off fanboys used said rationale for their retconning.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 01, 2015, 01:54:16 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MeCQctonyJE#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MeCQctonyJE#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 01, 2015, 07:04:24 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 01, 2015, 10:10:31 AM
Quote from: predxeno on May 01, 2015, 06:36:59 AM
If I said that the Stegosaurs seen in the trailer are the same Stegosaurs that existed offscreen in the first film, what kind of reaction would I have gotten then?

You would get very strange looks because you might as well say, remember that lightbulb in the visitors centres toilets we never saw? Well its coming back for the 4th movie! Both the Stegosaurus and the lightbulb did nothing in the original movie so it would be pointless. The Tyrannosaurus is a different kettle of fish as it was a prominent character.

The idea behind the T-rex from the first film coming back is a mixture of constancy and fan service. Before Grant and co visited JP InGen moved animals from Site B to Nublar. one of which was the female Tyrannosaur. Now after the accident in the park she was free to rule the island for 12 or so years before Masrani turns up to build a new park. They recaptured her and now showcase her at the T-Rex kingdom.

What is not to like? 8)


Quote from: HuDaFuK on May 01, 2015, 07:40:21 AM
In fairness, that's not what Trevorrow said. He said it's a "direct sequel". The could quite easily mean it considers the intervening films null and void. Superman Returns did exactly that.


From http://www.masraniglobal.com/about/divisions/ingen/security/index.html (http://www.masraniglobal.com/about/divisions/ingen/security/index.html)

QuoteA seasoned security contractor, Vic Hoskins was involved in overseeing the infamous flying reptile "cleanup" operation over Canada in 2001. Due to the professionalism his team displayed, he was hired personally by Simon Masrani to re-develop InGen's Security Division, which helped oversee the protection of workers on Isla Nublar during Jurassic World's construction.

You don't need to watch 2 and 3 to understand 4 simple as that.

This.

And yeah that confirms JP3 did happen. It's just you don't need to see the other sequels to watch this one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on May 01, 2015, 07:14:48 PM
lol people still think lost world and jp3 are retconneed? the director himself has said that they have been pushed to side because they take place on another island, that doesn't mean that they are retconned.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on May 01, 2015, 08:09:00 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on May 01, 2015, 07:04:24 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 01, 2015, 10:10:31 AM
Quote from: predxeno on May 01, 2015, 06:36:59 AM
If I said that the Stegosaurs seen in the trailer are the same Stegosaurs that existed offscreen in the first film, what kind of reaction would I have gotten then?

You would get very strange looks because you might as well say, remember that lightbulb in the visitors centres toilets we never saw? Well its coming back for the 4th movie! Both the Stegosaurus and the lightbulb did nothing in the original movie so it would be pointless. The Tyrannosaurus is a different kettle of fish as it was a prominent character.

The idea behind the T-rex from the first film coming back is a mixture of constancy and fan service. Before Grant and co visited JP InGen moved animals from Site B to Nublar. one of which was the female Tyrannosaur. Now after the accident in the park she was free to rule the island for 12 or so years before Masrani turns up to build a new park. They recaptured her and now showcase her at the T-Rex kingdom.

What is not to like? 8)

Historically, movies that rely on fan hype or their popular opinion have never fared well in the box office, just look at movies such as AVPR, Silent Hill: Revelation, and Snakes on a Plane.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on May 01, 2015, 10:40:13 PM
Here is some footage from the
Spoiler
old visitor center
[close]

http://www.antena3.com/se-estrena/noticias/actualidad/visitamos-rodaje-jurassic-world_2015050100124.html (http://www.antena3.com/se-estrena/noticias/actualidad/visitamos-rodaje-jurassic-world_2015050100124.html)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on May 02, 2015, 10:02:16 AM
in the end all these might turn out be ture

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25QTbux3n7Q (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25QTbux3n7Q)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 02, 2015, 11:00:44 AM
Quote from: predxeno on May 01, 2015, 08:09:00 PM
Historically, movies that rely on fan hype or their popular opinion have never fared well in the box office, just look at movies such as AVPR, Silent Hill: Revelation, and Snakes on a Plane.

So you're speculating that JW might do badly at the box office because the same T-rex from the original film is back?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_lgwv9cIfV21qzd1oo.gif&hash=a2f5486518eea51c888a0157b86dde01e82b6c42)
Title: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on May 02, 2015, 01:08:32 PM
No, I'm stating that the producers seem to have more focus on fan hype than on producing a definable plot, one that many fans already dislike from the trailers (already not a good sign).  If you think you're so smart then why don't you suggest a legitimate plot reason why only the T-Rex is mentioned in this example and why dinos like the Gallimimus weren't. ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on May 02, 2015, 01:35:00 PM
you are making too big deal out of this whole old T-Rex thing. it is the old, experienced one to make it reasonable to kill the superior I-Rex. thats it
Title: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on May 02, 2015, 01:38:38 PM
Yeah, I kinda figured that though in all honesty, I'd be pretty disappointed if T-Rex killed I-Rex as it would make the I-Rex seem far less ferocious than we were made to believe, it being a fusion of many dinos including T-Rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 02, 2015, 02:26:22 PM
Quote from: predxeno on May 02, 2015, 01:08:32 PM
No, I'm stating that the producers seem to have more focus on fan hype than on producing a definable plot, one that many fans already dislike from the trailers (already not a good sign).  If you think you're so smart then why don't you suggest a legitimate plot reason why only the T-Rex is mentioned in this example and why dinos like the Gallimimus weren't. ::)

Which fans dislike the plot? From what I've seen its getting praise across the board from the fans mainly because what we've seen are snippets from the trailers. No one has seen the film yet.

Here is your reason...

Tyrannosaurus is the most well-known popular dinosaur on Earth. And one which has lived for decades is very impressive. Proves what a dominate predator the Tyrannosaurus is.

Quote from: predxeno on May 02, 2015, 01:38:38 PM
Yeah, I kinda figured that though in all honesty, I'd be pretty disappointed if T-Rex killed I-Rex

Life finds a way.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cinema52.com%2F2013%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F01%2FPompous-Malcolm.png&hash=6bdfd78492a13871a5392c390fbb15f571af2532)
Title: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on May 02, 2015, 02:32:28 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 02, 2015, 02:26:22 PM
Quote from: predxeno on May 02, 2015, 01:08:32 PM
No, I'm stating that the producers seem to have more focus on fan hype than on producing a definable plot, one that many fans already dislike from the trailers (already not a good sign).  If you think you're so smart then why don't you suggest a legitimate plot reason why only the T-Rex is mentioned in this example and why dinos like the Gallimimus weren't. ::)

Which fans dislike the plot? From what I've seen its getting praise across the board from the fans.

I was referring to the raptor bike gang shot actually, as much as I want to give this movie a chance, there quite a bit of suggestive evidence that this film was made as a cash grab to milk the audience with nostalgia. :(

Quote
Here is your reason...

Tyrannosaurus is the most well-known popular dinosaur on Earth. And one which has lived for decades is very impressive. Proves what a dominate predator the Tyrannosaurus is.

Yeah, but it's almost inconceivable that none of the other "original" dinos survived along with the Rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on May 02, 2015, 03:25:22 PM
Quote from: predxeno on May 02, 2015, 02:32:28 PM
Yeah, but it's almost inconceivable that none of the other "original" dinos survived along with the Rex.

So what?



As for nostalgia, I hate to break it to you, but this is a sequel. Nostalgia and past-mining go with the territory. JW has a very different aesthetic, virtually all new cast of characters (the Tyrannosaurus will probably be the most prominent returning star), and focuses far more on genetic tampering, theme park crassness and our relationship with animals. Even without having seen the film, it's obvious there's enough new here to creatively justify it.

You must be horrified about Star Wars' teaser trailer full of 40-year-old characters and designs, or James Bond resurrecting SPECTRE, if this stuff bothers you that much.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on May 02, 2015, 03:34:40 PM
Star Wars would bother me if only one of the characters was returning for the sequel and the entire plot hinges on that one character, thankfully though the producers had the foresight to bring back the entire cast and not just the one most popular character, how dumb would it have been if they decided the new movie didn't need any mention at all to Leia or Han?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on May 02, 2015, 03:51:05 PM
So, basically, you're upset that they're not bringing back (edit: or not saying they're bringing back) the original Triceratops, Parasaurolophus and Brachiosaurus? Which you would have no way of recognising, and saw very little screen time of?
Title: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on May 02, 2015, 04:00:41 PM
As if you would recognize the T-Rex?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 02, 2015, 04:29:17 PM
You're making far too big a deal about this. It's a little wink and smile to fans of the original film. It's not like the film is focusing on this to advertise itself.
Title: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on May 02, 2015, 04:36:14 PM
That's true, I never meant to suggest that the film will be bad because of this alone, I'm just expressing... a little bit of disgust that the producers are utilizing a cheap marketing technique to sell their movie.  Look at the new Star Trek movies, Leonard Nimoy was in both but ultimately he didn't bring anything to the story that couldn't have been said by another character or do anything that was particularly significant in any way; he was a great character but got turned into a meaningless prop just to boost fan hype.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on May 02, 2015, 04:45:24 PM
Quote from: predxeno on May 02, 2015, 04:00:41 PM
As if you would recognize the T-Rex?

That's what the scars are for, from the raptor fight in the Visitors' Centre. Not to mention that it's a different colour to every other Tyrannosaurus we've seen. And that it's a singular entity used in a prominent role, unlike the herd herbivores.

I'm really regretting getting involved in this discussion. Beyond ridiculous.
Title: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on May 02, 2015, 05:06:58 PM
Every dino we see in each movie is a different color to the ones before it, the same goes true with the Aliens; they're not there to specify different individuals but to specify differences in artistic direction.  Btw, I've seen promo pictures of Jurassic World's T-Rex and I don't see any scars.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on May 02, 2015, 05:11:22 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwac.450f.edgecastcdn.net%2F80450F%2Fscreencrush.com%2F442%2Ffiles%2F2014%2F11%2FJurassic-World-T-Rex-1.jpg%3Fw%3D630%26amp%3Bcdnnode%3D1&hash=a5b4ac31101aaf88928efd20c5f1f2fe906b5448)

The scars are pretty obvious. But can we please stop this ridiculous discussion, it's kind of taking over the board....
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on May 02, 2015, 05:13:39 PM
Fine, I'm just saying that I don't find it logically feasible that the Rex is the only surviving Dino, that's all I have to say on the subject.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 02, 2015, 05:17:35 PM
Quote from: predxeno on May 02, 2015, 05:13:39 PM
Fine, I'm just saying that I don't find it logically feasible that the Rex is the only surviving Dino, that's all I have to say on the subject.
Where was this even said?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on May 02, 2015, 05:19:50 PM
I thought it was more or less implied when they only said the T-Rex was the same, but I suppose I could be reading too much into it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 02, 2015, 05:22:22 PM
They never implied it was the only survivor from the Nublar batch. Like. Ever.
Title: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on May 02, 2015, 05:24:48 PM
Fine, if they're actually trying to make sure the Rex is accurate to its last seen appearance in the first movie then I guess I was wrong about it being a cheap marketing technique, I've grown quite cynical of movies these days (there were just way too many personal disappointments for me).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on May 02, 2015, 07:00:59 PM
I added all the new shots from the featurette into the global trailer.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKFcQnMqABc (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKFcQnMqABc)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 04, 2015, 02:17:10 AM
Quote from: predxeno on May 02, 2015, 01:08:32 PM
No, I'm stating that the producers seem to have more focus on fan hype than on producing a definable plot, one that many fans already dislike from the trailers (already not a good sign).  If you think you're so smart then why don't you suggest a legitimate plot reason why only the T-Rex is mentioned in this example and why dinos like the Gallimimus weren't. ::)

Going a few pages back to point out how ridiculous this is. How are they losing focus by making it the same Rex? It's just a cool little addition that they've hardly even talked about or even marketed. You're making a big deal about something that is just a little wave to the fans.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 04, 2015, 11:42:25 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on May 02, 2015, 03:51:05 PM
So, basically, you're upset that they're not bringing back (edit: or not saying they're bringing back) the original Triceratops, Parasaurolophus and Girrafatitan? Which you would have no way of recognising, and saw very little screen time of?

Fixed ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 04, 2015, 01:31:19 PM
Brachiosaurus is what they call it in the movie, so yeah.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 04, 2015, 02:15:30 PM
That's fine. It's still Girrafatitan.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 04, 2015, 06:17:19 PM
People care as much as they do when they still call the other guys "Velociraptors".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 04, 2015, 08:34:34 PM
Good for them. I'm still right.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on May 04, 2015, 10:54:36 PM
AND HERES YOUR PRIZE


nvm there isnt one
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on May 05, 2015, 01:53:12 AM
new tv spot showing the raptor squad with camera's/tracking devices

https://twitter.com/ryankissel/status/595387491500171265 (https://twitter.com/ryankissel/status/595387491500171265)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on May 05, 2015, 03:55:16 AM
Flying reptiles dropping people into the Mosasaur pool.. oh my lord..
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on May 05, 2015, 04:20:58 AM
Quote from: MudButt on May 05, 2015, 03:55:16 AM
Flying reptiles dropping people into the Mosasaur pool.. oh my lord..
Just when I thought this movie wouldn't grab my fear of thalassophobia...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on May 05, 2015, 08:51:02 AM
so that chick wont die  >:(


- dino grabs girl
- girl freez herself/owen shots the dino
- girl falls in the water
- dino goes after her
- mosasaur eats the dino


:-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :'(


and hmmm a tamed raptor kills that guy, not a wild one. so they indeed turn on the people
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on May 05, 2015, 10:34:25 AM
Quote from: szkoki on May 05, 2015, 08:51:02 AM
so that chick wont die  >:(

Uhmmm

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/1795523_10204298316639912_3951038517119286708_n.jpg?oh=05afd272c27c23eb5995f5dbccd541da&oe=55CE4E27&__gda__=1440545816_ab90ad9b5f9f6c288062e3f833979a6d)

Notice that arm wasn't there in the global trailer ;-)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 05, 2015, 12:06:09 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfU09P3IttQ#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfU09P3IttQ#ws)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on May 05, 2015, 01:03:52 PM
killing innocent people?! love this! how could this be pg13 then?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on May 05, 2015, 01:12:40 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on May 05, 2015, 10:34:25 AM
Quote from: szkoki on May 05, 2015, 08:51:02 AM
so that chick wont die  >:(

Uhmmm

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/1795523_10204298316639912_3951038517119286708_n.jpg?oh=05afd272c27c23eb5995f5dbccd541da&oe=55CE4E27&__gda__=1440545816_ab90ad9b5f9f6c288062e3f833979a6d)

Notice that arm wasn't there in the global trailer ;-)
At first I thought that was the pteranodons leg but on closer inspection that looks like the chick who gets dropped in the pools arm alright.

Quote from: szkoki on May 05, 2015, 01:03:52 PM
killing innocent people?! love this! how could this be pg13 then?
That's why the pteranodon is in the middle of the shot, to obscure the obvious. This movie is getting more and more badass. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on May 05, 2015, 01:32:28 PM
Empire also speaks of a rather bloody death in a laboratorium by
Spoiler
raptor Blue
[close]
but this victim probably isn't so innocent.

Notice the Raptors finally have their cameras on their heads...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightlord on May 05, 2015, 05:07:46 PM
Quote from: ace3g on May 05, 2015, 12:06:09 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfU09P3IttQ#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfU09P3IttQ#ws)
Hope that T-rex roar is a placeholder.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on May 06, 2015, 10:15:22 AM
The Lost World & Jurassic Park 3 are still canon
Posted by Jack DLM - Thursday 30 April 2015 at 11:38AM - 30 Comments
It's too bad when a fan site has to perform damage control, but unfortunately it looks like it's a neccessity given the latest round of "news".

The Lost World: Jurassic Park (1997) and Jurassic Park 3 (2001) are still canon.

The idea that the events that happened in the two sequels to the original Jurassic Park (1993) are going to be ignored in the upcoming Jurassic World (2015), come from the culture website Uproxx, who spread said article yesterday.


Their article title was simple: 'Jurassic World' Will Ignore The Events Of 'The Lost World' And 'Jurassic Park III'. Wrong. If the writer at Uproxx had even considered carrying out research before pursing spreading false information, then he would have seen that the viral website Masrani Global directly references the events at the end of Jurassic Park 3, where escaped Pteranodons from Isla Sorna fly out to the mainland.

"A seasoned security contractor, Vic Hoskins was involved in overseeing the infamous flying reptile "cleanup" operation over Canada in 2001."

Vic Hoskins is the Head of Security at InGen Security and his backstory and reason for his position at Jurassic World, comes down to his cleanup of those Pteranodons that escaped in Jurassic Park 3. Does that sound like those events will be ignored in Jurassic World?

In Uproxx's article they directly reference director Colin Trevorrow, who is quoted as saying that his film is a direct sequel to Jurassic Park. He says that the previous sequels aren't being written out of continuity, but placed to the side because they happened on a different island. The events are still canon, but we will not visit Isla Sorna in the film.

Isla Sorna is a real island and everything that happened on Isla Sorna in 1997 and 2001 are real and happened in the franchise of Jurassic Park.

I hope this has helped to clear things up - it's a shame that websites report false information. Usually these kind of articles would go unnoticed but this began to spread and we felt like we should put things right.


http://www.jurassicworld.org/ (http://www.jurassicworld.org/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Njm1983 on May 07, 2015, 01:01:08 AM
Quote from: Nightlord on May 05, 2015, 05:07:46 PM
Quote from: ace3g on May 05, 2015, 12:06:09 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfU09P3IttQ#ws (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfU09P3IttQ#ws)
Hope that T-rex roar is a placeholder.

Pretty sure it is. There's a second clip of the movie where the i-rex escapes and she roars during that sequence. The roar isn't the t rex at all
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 07, 2015, 02:14:48 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi86.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk93%2FDoomRulz_316%2F11011804_878058435588494_8810169270823455575_n_zpsywdclica.jpg&hash=05da6932f8a030a86dd1072d009633804714a5fd)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on May 07, 2015, 11:13:20 PM
Barbasol shaving cream! \0/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMaiXAF7ccQ&feature=youtu.be (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMaiXAF7ccQ&feature=youtu.be)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 08, 2015, 02:26:33 AM
Guess who has both can versions on order 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 08, 2015, 03:02:15 AM
Quote from: Snowdog on May 07, 2015, 11:13:20 PM
Barbasol shaving cream! \0/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMaiXAF7ccQ&feature=youtu.be (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMaiXAF7ccQ&feature=youtu.be)
Omg I thought it was some fan video or something  :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on May 08, 2015, 03:08:02 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 07, 2015, 02:14:48 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi86.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk93%2FDoomRulz_316%2F11011804_878058435588494_8810169270823455575_n_zpsywdclica.jpg&hash=05da6932f8a030a86dd1072d009633804714a5fd)
Ah yeah!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on May 08, 2015, 05:34:18 AM
Quote from: Xan21 on May 05, 2015, 10:34:25 AM
Quote from: szkoki on May 05, 2015, 08:51:02 AM
so that chick wont die  >:(

Uhmmm

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/1795523_10204298316639912_3951038517119286708_n.jpg?oh=05afd272c27c23eb5995f5dbccd541da&oe=55CE4E27&__gda__=1440545816_ab90ad9b5f9f6c288062e3f833979a6d)

Notice that arm wasn't there in the global trailer ;-)

They released the extended tv spot in HD, now the arm is missing again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on May 08, 2015, 08:18:28 AM
honestly i cant see the arm neither in the HD or the 360p version, its only in that blurry one :D. but its defenitly there on that one
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 08, 2015, 12:48:32 PM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on May 08, 2015, 05:34:18 AM
Quote from: Xan21 on May 05, 2015, 10:34:25 AM
Quote from: szkoki on May 05, 2015, 08:51:02 AM
so that chick wont die  >:(

Uhmmm

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/1795523_10204298316639912_3951038517119286708_n.jpg?oh=05afd272c27c23eb5995f5dbccd541da&oe=55CE4E27&__gda__=1440545816_ab90ad9b5f9f6c288062e3f833979a6d)

Notice that arm wasn't there in the global trailer ;-)

They released the extended tv spot in HD, now the arm is missing again.

Toying with our feelings.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on May 08, 2015, 07:09:23 PM
i guess they didnt want to spoil that death.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 08, 2015, 09:53:00 PM
Quote from: frenchfries on May 08, 2015, 07:09:23 PM
i guess they didnt want to spoil that death.

Hopefully it's that and not that they're cowarding away from that. Trailer still shows the girl falling into the water though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on May 09, 2015, 05:14:43 PM
124 minutes including credits. Enough time for wonder, mayhem and character development I think ;D 8)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jurassicworld.org%2Fnews%2Fuploads%2FJWRuntime124.JPG&hash=7d718e5f3824d8b9bb6cc9da86a1bf781607f779)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Darkness on May 09, 2015, 05:39:40 PM
Definitely good news. I always hated JP3's 90mins running time. Wasn't enough time for a movie like this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on May 10, 2015, 01:08:48 AM
New tv spot. Low quality but has some new shots.
Couldn't be more excited for this movie, but I kind of dislike how much the dino's use their hands/claws..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IEVu28wX4U (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IEVu28wX4U)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on May 10, 2015, 11:36:49 AM
one month to gooooo. im excited aswell now. everything looks sooo good so far
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on May 10, 2015, 03:12:17 PM
I'm organizing a big Midnight premiere event down in Brevard County, FL.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: jacc.90 on May 11, 2015, 12:00:57 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on May 10, 2015, 01:08:48 AM
New tv spot. Low quality but has some new shots.
Couldn't be more excited for this movie, but I kind of dislike how much the dino's use their hands/claws..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IEVu28wX4U (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IEVu28wX4U)

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Foi57.tinypic.com%2Faexg8p.jpg&hash=8b16f089e39eb4d8571b116e2a3d1f0b9d66d7d3)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on May 11, 2015, 12:57:23 PM
Quote from: jacc.90 on May 11, 2015, 12:00:57 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on May 10, 2015, 01:08:48 AM
New tv spot. Low quality but has some new shots.
Couldn't be more excited for this movie, but I kind of dislike how much the dino's use their hands/claws..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IEVu28wX4U (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IEVu28wX4U)

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Foi57.tinypic.com%2Faexg8p.jpg&hash=8b16f089e39eb4d8571b116e2a3d1f0b9d66d7d3)
[close]

Spoiler
Could it be in the old visitor's centre?
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 11, 2015, 01:45:45 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on May 09, 2015, 05:14:43 PM
124 minutes including credits. Enough time for wonder, mayhem and character development I think ;D 8)
http://www.jurassicworld.org/news/uploads/JWRuntime124.JPG

Excellent. Two hours is a good runtime for a film like this I think. 2.5 would've been pushing it. In other news, my contact in Pennsylvania, owner of the second largest JP collection in the world, is hooking me up with U.S.-exclusive JW merch 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: jacc.90 on May 11, 2015, 03:20:32 PM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on May 11, 2015, 12:57:23 PM
Quote from: jacc.90 on May 11, 2015, 12:00:57 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on May 10, 2015, 01:08:48 AM
New tv spot. Low quality but has some new shots.
Couldn't be more excited for this movie, but I kind of dislike how much the dino's use their hands/claws..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IEVu28wX4U (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IEVu28wX4U)

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Foi57.tinypic.com%2Faexg8p.jpg&hash=8b16f089e39eb4d8571b116e2a3d1f0b9d66d7d3)
[close]

Spoiler
Could it be in the old visitor's centre?
[close]

Spoiler
YES !! :D
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on May 11, 2015, 07:54:04 PM
there are 2 different tv spot 5 and a tv spot 6 aswell with a few new scenes but youtube wont allow me to post vids nowdays
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_sort=video_date_uploaded&search_query=jurassic+world+tv+spot (https://www.youtube.com/results?search_sort=video_date_uploaded&search_query=jurassic+world+tv+spot)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on May 11, 2015, 09:50:57 PM
That one trailer where she tells the kid they can never tell their mother what they did kind of reminded my of Shaw from the end of Prometheus.

"Final report of the vessel Prometheus. The ship and her entire crew are gone. If you are receiving this transmission make no attempt to come to it's origin. There is only death here now, and I'm leaving it behind. It is New Years day the year of our lord, 2094. My name is Elizabeth Shaw the last survivor of the Prometheus. And I am still searching..."

...because I definitely did not find any gigantic, super intelligent, millions of years old, genetically enhanced albino prehistoric (insert creature here). She even looked like Shaw in the trailer.  :laugh: Plus is the iRex playing soccer with the Ankylosaurus? What the hell? Did they mix some Brazilian pro soccer player DNA into them too?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on May 12, 2015, 10:04:01 AM
One more month until a new world is envisioned!


Also @doomrulz, where in PA is that guy?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on May 12, 2015, 10:10:50 AM
what do you think what will be the opening scene? it will be with Owen? with the kids?
it looks like they will introduce the park through the eyes of the kids but still
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 12, 2015, 11:50:26 AM
Quote from: szkoki on May 12, 2015, 10:10:50 AM
what do you think what will be the opening scene? it will be with Owen? with the kids?
it looks like they will introduce the park through the eyes of the kids but still

I have a strong feeling it will be like the first JP, only instead of the raptor being brought into her enclosure, it will be the I.Rex.

Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on May 12, 2015, 10:04:01 AM
Also @doomrulz, where in PA is that guy?

Mechanicsburg
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on May 12, 2015, 12:39:20 PM
Quote from: szkoki on May 12, 2015, 10:10:50 AM
what do you think what will be the opening scene? it will be with Owen? with the kids?
it looks like they will introduce the park through the eyes of the kids but still

I hope for some kind of flashback through the years after the disaster of the first park, where you see some dinosaur's roaming free and the ingen board discussing what to do and maybe a little construction of the new park with Richard attenborough's voiceover :P


but i doubt it
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on May 12, 2015, 12:50:50 PM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on May 12, 2015, 12:39:20 PMwith Richard attenborough's voiceover

Be kinda hard to do given that he passed away last year...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on May 12, 2015, 01:22:02 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on May 12, 2015, 12:50:50 PM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on May 12, 2015, 12:39:20 PMwith Richard attenborough's voiceover

Be kinda hard to do given that he passed away last year...

Yes, I know, maybe they could have recorded it in early production. I remember when he passed away they posted a picture of the "Hammond" statue from the JW movie to honor him.

Anyways it was more something that I would have liked to see rather then really hoping that would be in the movie (his voiceover, I still have hope for the rest of what I wrote :P)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 12, 2015, 05:50:03 PM
I liked these reviews.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKY3scPIMd8 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKY3scPIMd8)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bivMoH_wH8k (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bivMoH_wH8k)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4XupDI77Go (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4XupDI77Go)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on May 12, 2015, 10:26:34 PM
Considering this is a genetic freak monster movie I hope they used Hammond's DNA in the iRex. That would be amazing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 13, 2015, 12:06:05 AM
Lol wut
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naissus on May 13, 2015, 12:07:46 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on May 12, 2015, 10:26:34 PM
Considering this is a genetic freak monster movie I hope they used Hammond's DNA in the iRex. That would be amazing.

So you want the iRex to have a white beard or a hat or both?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on May 13, 2015, 02:38:57 AM
Just a little twisted irony where John Hammond's DNA was the human donation to the Indominus Rex. Like the reason why all the kids will survive in this movie. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 13, 2015, 05:12:09 AM
They'd have to change the name to Sparednoexpenseosaurus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on May 13, 2015, 06:45:41 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on May 13, 2015, 05:12:09 AM
They'd have to change the name to Sparednoexpenseosaurus.
That... that sounds amazing! Maybe that could be the iRex's beta-testing name.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on May 13, 2015, 07:52:57 AM
Quote from: Naissus on May 13, 2015, 12:07:46 AMSo you want the iRex to have a white beard or a hat or both?

Director's Cut, this needs to happen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 13, 2015, 11:49:46 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kn7UgJpRWMY&feature=youtu.be (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kn7UgJpRWMY&feature=youtu.be)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 13, 2015, 12:22:55 PM
Haha, that kid at the beginning
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on May 13, 2015, 01:36:45 PM
I also want a dinosaur petting zoo!!! ;D This movie is most definitly going to capture the magic the first Jurassic Park has before the shitstorm of escaping dinosaurs 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on May 13, 2015, 09:51:16 PM
im not at all a cgi freak but the gyrosphere scene looks weak compared to the other ones  :-\



on the other hand!!!! i want a Little Foot reference now mr Spielberg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on May 13, 2015, 11:09:41 PM
Going back to a question from the last page, I have this in mind for the beginning scene:

forest shaking (lasts about 30-40 seconds), cameras zoom in the forest to reveal tourists witnessing the dinos, then a voice-over of Patels owner comes in and a commercial for JW begins. Zooms out to reveal a panel of people watching the video, then opinions begin to surface from the people in suits and expensive dresses.

As for the conclusion of the film:

Spoiler
Siberian Patel/Ingen operation with a heavy suited man comes running up to patels owner saying: "You have to see this. I think we found it."
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 13, 2015, 11:42:46 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CE5-7MNVAAAcPGF.png:large)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on May 14, 2015, 12:42:42 AM
Quote from: ace3g on May 13, 2015, 11:42:46 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CE5-7MNVAAAcPGF.png:large)

Lets hope that one scene wont be the only scene with the Tyrannosaurus tho
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 14, 2015, 11:59:20 AM
Most will like this tv spot

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2cc5lQuWfI&feature=youtu.be (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2cc5lQuWfI&feature=youtu.be)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on May 14, 2015, 12:08:34 PM
Strong imagery with beautiful music, that's how you do it... I knew I saw an Indominus Rex head at the top of the waterfall in tv spot 7...wonder how they performed that stunt (it does seem like the kids, same with Zara)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 14, 2015, 12:25:08 PM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on May 14, 2015, 12:42:42 AM
Quote from: ace3g on May 13, 2015, 11:42:46 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CE5-7MNVAAAcPGF.png:large)

Lets hope that one scene wont be the only scene with the Tyrannosaurus tho

I'm sure it won't be. I have a feeling Universal is taking the cries from JP 3 seriously in regards to the T.Rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on May 14, 2015, 05:46:34 PM
Better f**king damn well be.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on May 14, 2015, 10:14:13 PM
Ah the T-Rex shows up at the end and eats the iRex's corpse because we all now the T-Rex was more a scavenger than a hunter.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 15, 2015, 12:10:01 AM
On the topic of Jurassic Park, I have new toys to share! Alien3, Fiorina, you guys will like these ;)

https://instagram.com/p/2rkQimlEol/
https://instagram.com/p/2rk_1ZFEpY/
https://instagram.com/p/2rlJwmFEpo/
https://instagram.com/p/2rlb7PFEqK/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on May 15, 2015, 12:40:00 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FYVUnaoyfkk (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FYVUnaoyfkk)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 15, 2015, 01:14:05 AM
(https://scontent-ord.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xtf1/v/t1.0-9/10432550_353302471545921_7815176057567257710_n.jpg?oh=840835dcf2f6af4dc8df1dd305737030&oe=55C29B6A)

That photo was shared on Facebook just now...I want to give the film the benefit of the doubt and assume the guy just got up from resting, but if not, then this is bad. Really bad. A tail-dragging Stegosaurus?!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on May 15, 2015, 03:07:27 AM
At least the Parasaurolophuses look pretty good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on May 15, 2015, 04:52:58 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 15, 2015, 01:14:05 AM
(https://scontent-ord.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xtf1/v/t1.0-9/10432550_353302471545921_7815176057567257710_n.jpg?oh=840835dcf2f6af4dc8df1dd305737030&oe=55C29B6A)

That photo was shared on Facebook just now...I want to give the film the benefit of the doubt and assume the guy just got up from resting, but if not, then this is bad. Really bad. A tail-dragging Stegosaurus?!
we have already seen scenes where the stegosaurus have their tails in the correct position, so i wouldnt worry about this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on May 15, 2015, 04:54:44 AM
Lolwow
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 15, 2015, 06:46:31 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 15, 2015, 12:10:01 AM
On the topic of Jurassic Park, I have new toys to share! Alien3, Fiorina, you guys will like these ;)

https://instagram.com/p/2rkQimlEol/
https://instagram.com/p/2rk_1ZFEpY/
https://instagram.com/p/2rlJwmFEpo/
https://instagram.com/p/2rlb7PFEqK/

Its a sickness Doom.  :-*

Loving that you found a Lost World Carno!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HappyAlien on May 15, 2015, 07:40:53 AM
I am looking forward to this but its funny how this is 22 years after the first film but the CGI does not look really much better. A lot more complex shots than the original but the original film holds up really well for something made in the early 90's.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 15, 2015, 12:17:30 PM
Quote from: frenchfries on May 15, 2015, 04:52:58 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 15, 2015, 01:14:05 AM
(https://scontent-ord.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xtf1/v/t1.0-9/10432550_353302471545921_7815176057567257710_n.jpg?oh=840835dcf2f6af4dc8df1dd305737030&oe=55C29B6A)

That photo was shared on Facebook just now...I want to give the film the benefit of the doubt and assume the guy just got up from resting, but if not, then this is bad. Really bad. A tail-dragging Stegosaurus?!
we have already seen scenes where the stegosaurus have their tails in the correct position, so i wouldnt worry about this.

Have we? The last clip I saw was the global trailer and the Stego is barely in it. I'll take your word for it though.

Quote from: Alien³ on May 15, 2015, 06:46:31 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 15, 2015, 12:10:01 AM
On the topic of Jurassic Park, I have new toys to share! Alien3, Fiorina, you guys will like these ;)

https://instagram.com/p/2rkQimlEol/
https://instagram.com/p/2rk_1ZFEpY/
https://instagram.com/p/2rlJwmFEpo/
https://instagram.com/p/2rlb7PFEqK/

Its a sickness Doom.  :-*

Loving that you found a Lost World Carno!

Isn't it though?! I have more so stay tuned ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: reecebomb on May 15, 2015, 12:29:29 PM
Quote from: HappyAlien on May 15, 2015, 07:40:53 AM
I am looking forward to this but its funny how this is 22 years after the first film but the CGI does not look really much better. A lot more complex shots than the original but the original film holds up really well for something made in the early 90's.


Overall the cgi looks worse compared to the first, sure the models are more detailed and animation more complex but main problem is the lack of weight to movements and animation.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 15, 2015, 02:13:03 PM
In genreal CGI is underrated.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on May 15, 2015, 06:05:51 PM
LoL r u kidding?  Cgi is superior to the  one in '93.
Whats wrong with everyone seriously?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 15, 2015, 06:46:34 PM
http://www.cracked.com/blog/6-reasons-expensive-films-end-up-with-crappy-special-effects/ (http://www.cracked.com/blog/6-reasons-expensive-films-end-up-with-crappy-special-effects/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 15, 2015, 08:54:11 PM
New clip. Doesn't feel like it's part of the movie though, more like more viral marketing.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 15, 2015, 10:00:13 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on May 15, 2015, 08:54:11 PM
New clip. Doesn't feel like it's part of the movie though, more like more viral marketing.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=FYVUnaoyfkk (https://youtube.com/watch?v=FYVUnaoyfkk)

Part of the viral marketing it is...

http://www.masraniglobal.com/about/divisions/ingen/index.html (http://www.masraniglobal.com/about/divisions/ingen/index.html)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 15, 2015, 10:38:44 PM
Yo Alien3, check these out.
https://instagram.com/p/2uB06IFEi1/
https://instagram.com/p/2uCHO7lEjO/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 15, 2015, 10:51:36 PM
Ah, on the old Barbasol can wagon I see.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 16, 2015, 01:11:05 AM
https://twitter.com/JurassicPark/status/599380659556061184

New tv spot
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 16, 2015, 05:57:58 AM
Quote from: ace3g on May 16, 2015, 01:11:05 AM
https://twitter.com/JurassicPark/status/599380659556061184

New tv spot

Holy shit that ending  :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on May 16, 2015, 06:58:22 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on May 16, 2015, 05:57:58 AM
Quote from: ace3g on May 16, 2015, 01:11:05 AM
https://twitter.com/JurassicPark/status/599380659556061184

New tv spot

Holy shit that ending  :o
That raptor had some kind of head gear on... meaning something definitely went wrong.  :laugh:

Actually I just thought of something... maybe the raptor was trying to get into the van to escape the iRex? HAHA!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on May 16, 2015, 10:41:29 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on May 16, 2015, 05:57:58 AM
Quote from: ace3g on May 16, 2015, 01:11:05 AM
https://twitter.com/JurassicPark/status/599380659556061184 (https://twitter.com/JurassicPark/status/599380659556061184)

New tv spot

Holy shit that ending  :o

OMG :O OMG OMG

but please no more of that stupid ass raptors who just eyes staring instead of killing

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rellimzone.com%2Fimages%2Fmovies%2Fthe-lost-world-jurassic-park-1997-13.png&hash=c588c5d798e864bc084cb298281b7dd444c11db2)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on May 16, 2015, 11:52:55 AM
Bye bye Baby Triceratops

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRVycmrn8Wo (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRVycmrn8Wo)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on May 16, 2015, 05:41:20 PM
It's time for me to stop watching spoilers  :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 17, 2015, 02:55:40 AM
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on May 17, 2015, 09:53:13 AM
Quote from: Xan21 on May 16, 2015, 11:52:55 AM
Bye bye Baby Triceratops

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRVycmrn8Wo (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRVycmrn8Wo)


she dropped her  ::)

ps: the raptor wich jumps in the car is a tamed raptor
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 17, 2015, 10:33:41 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 15, 2015, 10:51:36 PM
Ah, on the old Barbasol can wagon I see.

Check to see if they're available in the U.K.!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 18, 2015, 06:43:19 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 17, 2015, 10:33:41 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 15, 2015, 10:51:36 PM
Ah, on the old Barbasol can wagon I see.

Check to see if they're available in the U.K.!!!

I might pick one up but I'm in no rush. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on May 18, 2015, 09:43:07 AM
Must.Stop.Watching.Trailer :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on May 18, 2015, 11:34:30 AM
Spoiler
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CFR8kWJUkAE--rL.jpg:large)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 18, 2015, 02:01:44 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 18, 2015, 06:43:19 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 17, 2015, 10:33:41 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 15, 2015, 10:51:36 PM
Ah, on the old Barbasol can wagon I see.

Check to see if they're available in the U.K.!!!

I might pick one up but I'm in no rush. ;)

Be careful. They might disappear faster than you think. You know how this works.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on May 18, 2015, 02:03:50 PM
Nice photoshoot, also confirms they have a practical head of one raptor (blue).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JOpAEYsoHmM (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JOpAEYsoHmM)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 18, 2015, 05:13:20 PM
That looks like a reference model more than an actual animatronic though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on May 18, 2015, 06:44:45 PM
Colin said that they used animatronic raptor heads in the film so the actors had something to interact with.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=026ct2_DRns (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=026ct2_DRns)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.collider.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F05%2Fjurassic-world-indominous-rex-mercedes.jpg&hash=9c3d53073d9da58f9ac60f92fba22fc1906dcdd8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on May 18, 2015, 09:44:21 PM
product placement (ding!)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 19, 2015, 12:47:26 AM


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3d0B-GUShM4&feature=youtu.be



Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cap. Fitzgerald on May 19, 2015, 06:07:13 AM
I'm sure there's lots of practical shots in the movie (for instance Pratt holding a dying dinos head in one trailer looked very practical) especially for the raptors since they're more characters than dinosaurs in this one.
Everyone just keeps making a big deal about the cgi though :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on May 19, 2015, 07:36:54 AM
http://www.comingsoon.net/movies/trailers/441771-an-extended-jurassic-world-spot-features-john-hammond-narration#/slide/1
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on May 19, 2015, 09:54:36 PM




still bugs me why are the flying dinos are on rampage

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 20, 2015, 11:33:56 PM
Premier soon!

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CFettczVIAICLd7.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 21, 2015, 01:22:44 AM
New tv spot shown during NBA Eastern Conference Finals.  Shows interaction between Owen and the raptors.

Haven't seen this one on tv yet

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDAmYSFksfI&feature

Here is the commercial

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnT8-BHyVl4&feature
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on May 21, 2015, 10:15:55 AM
Delta  ???



i probably solved  the "they are communicating" part: my guess is the raptor squad runs into the wild ones or a wild one
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 21, 2015, 11:59:15 AM


Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on May 21, 2015, 12:18:27 PM
Wish they'd stop releasing footage! I can't stop myself from watching.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 21, 2015, 01:11:32 PM
Who's forcing you to? :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Alien Predator on May 21, 2015, 01:41:11 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 21, 2015, 01:11:32 PM
Who's forcing you to? :P

MEEE!!!  :D

And I'll make sure he sees the next one that comes along!


Seriously though, these clips make me so hyped for the film. I enjoyed all three movies.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on May 21, 2015, 03:41:34 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 21, 2015, 01:11:32 PM
Who's forcing you to? :P

Me. And them for making me excited.  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on May 21, 2015, 06:21:34 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSBzC66dZ_A&feature=youtu.be

I've not watched it yet but JP fanfilm released today.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 21, 2015, 06:34:52 PM
I already stopped watching them a while ago but I've seen some that popped up on TV and couldn't help myself :( Me and my brother were shocked during the Flash season finale they showed a kinda creepy one where the announcers voice deteriorates as the commercial progressed. We hadn't seen it and we saw

Spoiler
A baby triceratops almost picked up by one of the flying dinosaurs. I know they're not dinosaurs but in my attempts at avoiding spoilers I don't even know what those are, specifically. Anyone?
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Alien Predator on May 21, 2015, 07:08:30 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on May 21, 2015, 06:34:52 PM
I already stopped watching them a while ago but I've seen some that popped up on TV and couldn't help myself :( Me and my brother were shocked during the Flash season finale they showed a kinda creepy one where the announcers voice deteriorates as the commercial progressed. We hadn't seen it and we saw

Spoiler
A baby triceratops almost picked up by one of the flying dinosaurs. I know they're not dinosaurs but in my attempts at avoiding spoilers I don't even know what those are, specifically. Anyone?
[close]

Spoiler
I believe those are pteranodons which is a type of pterosaur among many other interesting ones.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on May 21, 2015, 07:57:20 PM
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on May 21, 2015, 12:18:27 PM
Wish they'd stop releasing footage! I can't stop myself from watching.
I agree. Effective immediately, I am staying away from this thread until premiere day!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 21, 2015, 08:16:23 PM
Quote from: Guan Thwei 1992 on May 21, 2015, 07:08:30 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on May 21, 2015, 06:34:52 PM
I already stopped watching them a while ago but I've seen some that popped up on TV and couldn't help myself :( Me and my brother were shocked during the Flash season finale they showed a kinda creepy one where the announcers voice deteriorates as the commercial progressed. We hadn't seen it and we saw

Spoiler
A baby triceratops almost picked up by one of the flying dinosaurs. I know they're not dinosaurs but in my attempts at avoiding spoilers I don't even know what those are, specifically. Anyone?
[close]

Spoiler
I believe those are pteranodons which is a type of pterosaur among many other interesting ones.
[close]

Spoiler
They don't look like the previous Pteranodons. That's why I didn't think it was them.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Alien Predator on May 21, 2015, 09:36:52 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on May 21, 2015, 08:16:23 PM
Quote from: Guan Thwei 1992 on May 21, 2015, 07:08:30 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on May 21, 2015, 06:34:52 PM
I already stopped watching them a while ago but I've seen some that popped up on TV and couldn't help myself :( Me and my brother were shocked during the Flash season finale they showed a kinda creepy one where the announcers voice deteriorates as the commercial progressed. We hadn't seen it and we saw

Spoiler
A baby triceratops almost picked up by one of the flying dinosaurs. I know they're not dinosaurs but in my attempts at avoiding spoilers I don't even know what those are, specifically. Anyone?
[close]

Spoiler
I believe those are pteranodons which is a type of pterosaur among many other interesting ones.
[close]

Spoiler
They don't look like the previous Pteranodons. That's why I didn't think it was them.
[close]

Spoiler
The best way to identify a Pteranodon is by its toothless beak (most pterosaurs had teeth in their beaks) and a long crest extending out of the back of their heads. Having a closer look at them, they have a crest on their heads like a Pteranodon and their beaks are smooth and toothless.

Also I checked the Jurassic World official website and yes, it is a Pteranodon.  :)

Maybe the different look could be due to genetic tampering or it's a new subspecies of Pteranodon.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on May 21, 2015, 09:41:38 PM
Pterosaur discussion
Haven't seen the teaser, but Jurassic World has two genera of pterosaur, Pteranodon and Dimorphodon. Might be that you saw the latter.

Pteranodon

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnconway.co%2Fimages%2Fmedium%2Fpteranodon-sternbergi.jpeg&hash=c736051865c04d88bdd21e66c6ca3d68956017c3)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmpm.panaves.com%2Fnh%2Fpteranodon_longiceps_web.png&hash=fa5b8843a5dcd2e00e833988061d29aab702112c)

Pteranodon's a big oceangoing fish-eater, roughly the weight of a German Shepherd, wingspan averaging 5 metres. Long toothless beak, distinctive (but highly variable) head crest, Late Cretaceous.
They've appeared in the last two JP films, with JP3 inexplicably adding teeth to an animal whose name literally means "toothless wing".
[close]

Dimorphodon

(https://diariodaextincao.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/dimorphodon-700-309.jpg)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.markwitton.com%2Fcommunities%2F6%2F004%2F009%2F119%2F796%2Fimages%2F4618566556.jpg&hash=f7879d6d1ac5bcf880c0006b27d377eb818ac2e7)

Dimorphodon's one of the earliest known pterosaurs, roughly the weight of a large rabbit, wingspan one and a half metres. Narrow wings in relation to body size, enormous skull. Being a primitive pterosaur, it had teeth and a long tail.
It probably lived similarly to the first flying dinosaurs - inhabiting wooded or coastal areas, climbing trees then using its mobility advantage to snap up small vertebrates. It wasn't a great flier but it had decent maneuvrability.
[close]

:edit: Slightly ninja'd. Sigh.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 21, 2015, 11:39:14 PM


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9LIWraAgR1g

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rankles75 on May 22, 2015, 12:00:33 AM
Bit of an Alien vibe to the latest TV spot... :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 22, 2015, 02:19:35 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on May 21, 2015, 09:41:38 PM
Pterosaur discussion
Haven't seen the teaser, but Jurassic World has two genera of pterosaur, Pteranodon and Dimorphodon. Might be that you saw the latter.

Pteranodon

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnconway.co%2Fimages%2Fmedium%2Fpteranodon-sternbergi.jpeg&hash=c736051865c04d88bdd21e66c6ca3d68956017c3)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmpm.panaves.com%2Fnh%2Fpteranodon_longiceps_web.png&hash=fa5b8843a5dcd2e00e833988061d29aab702112c)

Pteranodon's a big oceangoing fish-eater, roughly the weight of a German Shepherd, wingspan averaging 5 metres. Long toothless beak, distinctive (but highly variable) head crest, Late Cretaceous.
They've appeared in the last two JP films, with JP3 inexplicably adding teeth to an animal whose name literally means "toothless wing".
[close]

Dimorphodon

(https://diariodaextincao.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/dimorphodon-700-309.jpg)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.markwitton.com%2Fcommunities%2F6%2F004%2F009%2F119%2F796%2Fimages%2F4618566556.jpg&hash=f7879d6d1ac5bcf880c0006b27d377eb818ac2e7)

Dimorphodon's one of the earliest known pterosaurs, roughly the weight of a large rabbit, wingspan one and a half metres. Narrow wings in relation to body size, enormous skull. Being a primitive pterosaur, it had teeth and a long tail.
It probably lived similarly to the first flying dinosaurs - inhabiting wooded or coastal areas, climbing trees then using its mobility advantage to snap up small vertebrates. It wasn't a great flier but it had decent maneuvrability.
[close]

:edit: Slightly ninja'd. Sigh.
[close]

Looks like a mix of both honestly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on May 22, 2015, 02:24:15 AM
damn he must be annoying :D this 30 secs is enough of him
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on May 22, 2015, 07:24:16 AM
One, the iRex hatching from the egg was amazing... and I wonder if it literally ate it's sibling just because it hatched first. Second, Pratt needs to stop ad-libbing his characters. He sucks at it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 22, 2015, 02:07:31 PM
I'VE BOUGHT MY TICKETS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on May 22, 2015, 04:44:22 PM
First look at Mr. Masrani. This clip really feels and looks and sounds like a modern Jurassic Park movie. Absolutely fits the style of the franchise. Really love it! ;D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZ7gABNxlxg (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZ7gABNxlxg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on May 22, 2015, 05:04:13 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 22, 2015, 02:07:31 PM
I'VE BOUGHT MY TICKETS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Picked up three tickets here. My theater's showing it on the 11th, a night early. Got a huge premiere group organized.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 22, 2015, 05:09:34 PM
Same, there are early showings as well over here. Just...I don't know, makes more sense to go on the Friday.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 22, 2015, 10:05:31 PM
I'll probably go Thursday the 11th as well. Imax.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Deathbearer on May 22, 2015, 11:03:16 PM
I'm going to end up seeing this. I don't know why, I only liked the first Jurassic Park..guess it's just something to see.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 23, 2015, 01:38:01 AM
The greatest thing I've ever seen.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CS5gcc2QH_8
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 23, 2015, 07:09:52 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 23, 2015, 01:38:01 AM
The greatest thing I've ever seen.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CS5gcc2QH_8

Amazing.

Was that made by Hubbs???

Quote from: Alien³ on May 23, 2015, 01:38:01 AM
The greatest thing I've ever seen.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CS5gcc2QH_8

Amazing.

Was that made by Hubbs???
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on May 23, 2015, 09:26:48 AM
Rewatched the original while eating dinner.

It's really, really sad that a sequel made in 2015 has dinosaurs that are no more convincing than those made 22 years earlier. The original has some shots that really have no aged well, but with the exception of some Brachiosaurus shots nothing looks as in-your-face CG as what this trailer is showing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on May 23, 2015, 11:49:51 AM
A lot of the scenes in Jurrasic park were under the cover of darkness... in Jurassic World everything in shown in full light and the later is far superior to the former. I'll probably say the same thing for JW 20 years from now but every damn time they show the Mosasaur in the trailer it keeps getting better and better looking. JP was a breakthrough that still stands up today but by today's standards it looks fake as shit in most aspects.

Well and truthfully that's because all of us have had much more experience with cg films and can tell the differences. I'm still shocked at how phoney the Star Wars prequels look yet back when they were released I thought it looked as real as can be.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on May 23, 2015, 03:41:30 PM
You didn't have to put it on your face :laugh: :laugh:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfIC1zn_lis (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfIC1zn_lis)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQ4Ecz6TFUQ (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQ4Ecz6TFUQ)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on May 23, 2015, 08:37:19 PM
HA that kid was hugging her for her boobs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Njm1983 on May 23, 2015, 11:09:27 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on May 23, 2015, 08:37:19 PM
HA that kid was hugging her for her boobs.

Id hug her for her boobs too ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 24, 2015, 12:48:53 AM
Rewatching my blu ray ultimate trilogy in anticipation  ;D

The Lost World is next  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on May 24, 2015, 01:17:58 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on May 23, 2015, 11:49:51 AM
A lot of the scenes in Jurrasic park were under the cover of darkness... in Jurassic World everything in shown in full light and the later is far superior to the former.
Not when it looks fake as shit. The teal and orange colour grade really doesn't help, either.

Quotebut by today's standards it looks fake as shit in most aspects.
Brachiosaur aside, not really. The CG raptors don't look any less convincing than the CG raptors in JW, and JW has 22 years of effects evolution on it.

QuoteWell and truthfully that's because all of us have had much more experience with cg films and can tell the differences.
It's because they aren't used as well.

Jurassic Park has fifteen minutes of dinosaurs. Fifteen. I watched the film last night and I still don't believe it. The shots stand up because every one of them had two years of R&D and incredibly talented people behind them making them the best they can be. They aren't in your face often or long enough to lose the suspense or the reality and they're cut into their environment like living animals.

Everything from JW is "Hey lookit the pretty shot".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on May 24, 2015, 02:37:21 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49-BAPy-rYU (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49-BAPy-rYU)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 24, 2015, 07:56:06 AM
SiL, to be fair the colour grading is oversaturated to shit in the trailers, but if you watch the clips the colour scheme is quite different. Not to mention that trailer CGI is mostly unfinished.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on May 24, 2015, 08:33:07 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on May 24, 2015, 07:56:06 AM
SiL, to be fair the colour grading is oversaturated to shit in the trailers, but if you watch the clips the colour scheme is quite different.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EY4qZO4vC4

Pause at 10 seconds. Or don't even play - the preview image that I get on this is perfect.

Look at the sky. The sky is yellow. As is the water reflecting it. Yellow. The fact anyone looked at that and said "Good enough! Let's roll it out to the world" is depressing, especially considering it is not that difficult to fix.

QuoteNot to mention that trailer CGI is mostly unfinished.
Not this close to release. Every time an effects-heavy trailer is rolled out for a movie and people say "Eh, looks whatever" people say "No no, they aren't done", and then we get to the cinemas and see, hey look, it's the same. Maybe some subtle differences. Rarely, you get Godzilla level complete redos. But it's 90% exactly what we see in the trailers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on May 24, 2015, 11:03:08 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEk9EH2dKlk
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 24, 2015, 11:31:53 AM
Quote from: szkoki on May 24, 2015, 11:03:08 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEk9EH2dKlk

Utterly beautiful!

Quote from: SiL on May 24, 2015, 01:17:58 AM
Quotebut by today's standards it looks fake as shit in most aspects.
Brachiosaur aside, not really. The CG raptors don't look any less convincing than the CG raptors in JW, and JW has 22 years of effects evolution on it.

There are differences.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CDp_RfHWAAEkPqD.png)

Special effects no matter what the era are never 100% convincing. What is real deal is how well they help cement the story. I still watch all the Ray Harryhausen movies and despite their out-dated look still love the movies and their style. JW looks to have some amazing work and the imagery is a brilliant blend of sets, practical work, CGI and camera work.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on May 24, 2015, 11:32:50 AM
I honestly don't get where you're coming from Sil. Jurassic Park is great and all but I'm amazed at the effects of the creatures in JW. Every single trailer has been an improvement on the previous. However now you're on about the color gradients... well I can totally understand that. I don't know why Terminator Genysis is using the orange gradient in the T-800 vs T-800 battle either. It was clearly blue in the original Terminator. However that being said I don't think it is too much of an issue in the trailer you posted. I'm having a harder time believing that chick can invent dinosaurs.

On another point, the iRex breaking out of the egg is really freaking creepy. If I saw that crap in real life I'd have hit the abort button. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 24, 2015, 02:17:41 PM
Quote from: SiL on May 24, 2015, 08:33:07 AM
Look at the sky. The sky is yellow. As is the water reflecting it. Yellow.
Looks clear to me -- only becomes yellow if I tilt the screen several degrees forward. This on my PC. Perhaps my screen has a different set up, I dunno. Same story on iPad but not even with tilting does it become yellow.

Quote from: SiL on May 24, 2015, 08:33:07 AM
Not this close to release. Every time an effects-heavy trailer is rolled out for a movie and people say "Eh, looks whatever" people say "No no, they aren't done", and then we get to the cinemas and see, hey look, it's the same. Maybe some subtle differences. Rarely, you get Godzilla level complete redos. But it's 90% exactly what we see in the trailers.
Not really. Trailer CGI is packaged following trailer release schedules while the final shot is still in progression. Certain sequences can go through several long stages. The Mosasaurus shot has been altered to hell and back since the first trailer. Of course this does not mean the final product will certainly have 100% real CGI -- but I'd wait for the finished thing, simply put.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 24, 2015, 10:23:08 PM
For anyone interested I'm recording commentaries for all 3 JP movies in the run up to JW.

Here's JP.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqI_bZqf76Q

TLW coming very soon!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 25, 2015, 12:05:08 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPVKkLcYuGw
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on May 25, 2015, 09:40:24 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on May 24, 2015, 02:17:41 PM
Looks clear to me -- only becomes yellow if I tilt the screen several degrees forward. This on my PC. Perhaps my screen has a different set up, I dunno. Same story on iPad but not even with tilting does it become yellow.
Looks yellow on everything I watch it on.

Quote from: Alien³ on May 24, 2015, 11:31:53 AM
There are differences.
Never said they weren't. Said more convincing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 25, 2015, 11:23:20 AM
Little video I cooked up last night instead of sleep.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fuS2Gvztiyo
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on May 25, 2015, 02:13:33 PM
New stills. Put them in a spoiler tag because they take a lot of space otherwise.
Source: http://emileeid.com/2015/05/25/exclusive-over-15-new-stills-from-jurassic-world/ (http://emileeid.com/2015/05/25/exclusive-over-15-new-stills-from-jurassic-world/)

Spoiler

(https://emileeid.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/2424_06745r.jpg?w=700&h=467)
(https://emileeid.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/2424_ab0220_comp_053785_1061r.jpg?w=700&h=394)
(https://emileeid.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/2424_d013_00354r_crop.jpg?w=700&h=438)
(https://emileeid.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/2424_d027_00085r.jpg?w=700&h=467)
(https://emileeid.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/2424_d027_00274r.jpg?w=700&h=467)
(https://emileeid.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/2424_d034_00180rv4.jpg?w=700&h=467)
(https://emileeid.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/2424_d050_00214rv2_crop.jpg?w=700&h=482)
(https://emileeid.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/2424_d061_00429rv2.jpg?w=700&h=467)
(https://emileeid.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/2424_d062_00075_crop.jpg?w=700&h=472)
(https://emileeid.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/2424_d066_00230r.jpg?w=700&h=467)
(https://emileeid.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/2424_d067_00065_r.jpg?w=700&h=467)
(https://emileeid.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/2424_fpf_00354r-2.jpg?w=700&h=348)
(https://emileeid.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/2424_fpf_00354r.jpg?w=700&h=420)
(https://emileeid.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/2424_ftt_00346ar_crop.jpg?w=700&h=383)
(https://emileeid.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/2424_ftt_00426ar_crop.jpg?w=700&h=385)
(https://emileeid.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/2424_ga_0540_cmp_0207062_m_g_srgb_086457r.jpg?w=700&h=391)
(https://emileeid.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/2424_sb_00075nbr.jpg?w=700&h=394)
[close]

Edit:
Including a new featurette ;D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2W_zHwmEzQ (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2W_zHwmEzQ)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on May 25, 2015, 06:52:17 PM
wow the cgi and the color grading look great in the new still!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 25, 2015, 07:08:43 PM
(https://scontent-mxp1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/v/t34.0-12/11349954_839083456177692_77715991_n.jpg?oh=13b2413ce92f5aef3ac2ea9acda2cbbf&oe=556637A6)
Goodness, what horridly bad CGI. The f**king ET game for Atari looks better than this crap. Unbearable.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vermillion on May 25, 2015, 07:13:24 PM
Haha!

Atari 2600 ET

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on May 25, 2015, 07:15:10 PM
HOW DARE THEY!!! LOOKS HORRIBLE!!! JP HAS MUCH BETTER SPECIAL EFFECTS!!!! blasphemy...

Spoiler
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: ::)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on May 25, 2015, 07:58:13 PM
On the subject of CGI...
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wired.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F05%2Fff_ilm_jurassicpark-e1431992048271.jpg&hash=1f5f22bb3a54e23bf379b8eebbb8b1366da207d9)

QuoteThe Untold Story of ILM, a Titan That Forever Changed Film
http://www.wired.com/2015/05/inside-ilm/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on May 26, 2015, 03:05:40 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on May 25, 2015, 07:08:43 PM
(https://scontent-mxp1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/v/t34.0-12/11349954_839083456177692_77715991_n.jpg?oh=13b2413ce92f5aef3ac2ea9acda2cbbf&oe=556637A6)
Goodness, what horridly bad CGI. The f**king ET game for Atari looks better than this crap. Unbearable.
thats prob not finished cgi. http://emileeid.com/2015/05/25/exclusive-over-15-new-stills-from-jurassic-world/
the cgi in this link looks lifelike!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Njm1983 on May 26, 2015, 03:06:58 AM
Yeah I think questions about the cgi quality need to die now. These stills look really amazing. The I Rex looks like it could have been an animatronic.

Spoiler
was that a baby I Rex being touched by pratt with the muzzle on it??? That thing had the creepiest look on its face while he was touching her
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on May 26, 2015, 07:58:47 AM
Quote from: Njm1983 on May 26, 2015, 03:06:58 AM
Yeah I think questions about the cgi quality need to die now. These stills look really amazing. The I Rex looks like it could have been an animatronic.

Spoiler
was that a baby I Rex being touched by pratt with the muzzle on it??? That thing had the creepiest look on its face while he was touching her
[close]
Spoiler
No that was a raptor, probably the one called Blue; considering the blue streak down it's sides. I think the trailers make it pretty clear that the Pratt guy has no idea about the iRex until they ask him to inspect their safety protocols and it's housing before introducing the iRex exhibit to the general public. "You went ahead and made a new dinosaur?"
[close]

The computer graphics are amazing. The iRex looks amazing in the trailers. It clearly sucked up a big bite of the budget and I like the organic feel of the design too. It looks hell-of-believable in my opinion.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 26, 2015, 08:06:15 AM
Quote from: Njm1983 on May 26, 2015, 03:06:58 AM
Yeah I think questions about the cgi quality need to die now.

I think they were kidding ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on May 26, 2015, 08:56:42 AM
Quote from: frenchfries on May 26, 2015, 03:05:40 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on May 25, 2015, 07:08:43 PM
(https://scontent-mxp1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/v/t34.0-12/11349954_839083456177692_77715991_n.jpg?oh=13b2413ce92f5aef3ac2ea9acda2cbbf&oe=556637A6)
Goodness, what horridly bad CGI. The f**king ET game for Atari looks better than this crap. Unbearable.
thats prob not finished cgi. http://emileeid.com/2015/05/25/exclusive-over-15-new-stills-from-jurassic-world/
the cgi in this link looks lifelike!

(https://emileeid.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/2424_fpf_00354r.jpg?w=700&h=420)

And I just learned Jake Johnson is in the film. And now I'm even more excited.  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on May 26, 2015, 09:19:22 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on May 25, 2015, 07:08:43 PM
(https://scontent-mxp1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/v/t34.0-12/11349954_839083456177692_77715991_n.jpg?oh=13b2413ce92f5aef3ac2ea9acda2cbbf&oe=556637A6)
Goodness, what horridly bad CGI.
I appreciate you're being sarcastic, but these days we can do much better, especially in motion. None of the shots of the creatures moving like like actual animals moving; they look like animation. That iRex breaking out of the egg might as well have been a 2D Disney animation overlaid onto the shot as far as its movements go, it's that far removed from how an actual living organism would move.

It's not even that I'm complaining, it's just really interesting how we started at the right place and spent a long time making shaders and textures look more realistic while losing touch of things like making sure the movement had any sort of reality to it. The reason I'm ripping on it here of all places is because this series shows a pretty damn direct line from the start of living, breathing creatures rendered in computers, to the present day. We get a direct comparison of 22 years of development.

In the original Jurassic Park they had to make the T-Rex run slower and slower while chasing the jeep because it didn't look right at the speeds they started at. The move says it can run 32mph: the scene has it run at 25mph. These days, though, if a director wanted a T-Rex running at 50mph, he would get a T-Rex running at 50mph, and it would look silly. If we're lucky, the director notices, and slows it down. If we're not, he tells the guys to go back and do whatever they need to in order for his vision of a T-Rex a reality.

One thing I would actually complain about with this movie is that the director is maybe competent and incredibly uninspired, but that's another issue entirely.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 26, 2015, 09:36:55 AM
Quote from: SiL on May 26, 2015, 09:19:22 AM
That iRex breaking out of the egg might as well have been a 2D Disney animation overlaid onto the shot as far as its movements go, it's that far removed from how an actual living organism would move.

It's like the Indominus is a made up animal or something :P Not to mention the trailer is edited with sped up footage, and quick cuts. The film might be different.

We haven't seen the film yet to really pass judgement on if the animals act like animals.

Quote from: SiL on May 26, 2015, 09:19:22 AM
One thing I would actually complain about with this movie is that the director is maybe competent and incredibly uninspired, but that's another issue entirely.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgifrific.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F09%2Fsb3hn4.gif&hash=f09bcd93d586d235b34990c239324590f634da51)

Trevorrow has masterfully brought this franchise back, in a smart and refreshing way. JP has a specific style and the film-makers have tapped into it perfectly for JW. I'm interested to know where you're coming from here...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on May 26, 2015, 09:58:55 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 26, 2015, 09:36:55 AMTrevorrow has masterfully brought this franchise back, in a smart and refreshing way. JP has a specific style and the film-makers have tapped into it perfectly for JW.

In fairness, your comment about speaking before the film is out applies equally to what you just said there :) We don't know any of that until the movie comes out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on May 26, 2015, 10:21:25 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 26, 2015, 09:36:55 AM
It's like the Indominus is a made up animal or something :P
And that's actually the kind of incredibly poor, lazy reasoning we get behind the scenes. Dinosaurs can't actually be cloned and the reality is we know very, very little about them -- but that didn't stop the team on the first movie putting in years of research into animal movement to ground their entirely unreal animals in reality :)

QuoteTrevorrow has masterfully brought this franchise back, in a smart and refreshing way. JP has a specific style and the film-makers have tapped into it perfectly for JW. I'm interested to know where you're coming from here...
I have to see the movie to judge the effects, but you can say he's "masterfully" done anything...?

I'm talking about his actual direction. Directing a movie is not about coming up with cool set-pieces or orchestrating large spectacles, it's in everything. If you want to know how good a director is, look at how he films the most cinematically dull thing possible -- two people talking. Great directors make it interesting, poor ones resort to basic coverage.

Treverrow is the latter.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Dz_nQYwkl4

This is from his first movie. As you can see from the comments, this is many people's favourite scene. From a directing standpoint, however, it is incredibly boring. It's the same three shots for three minutes. It would not have broke the bank or the schedule to at least quickly lock off a close-up of the girl's face, without the guy, to show her reactions and emotions, seeing as it's the key part of the scene. Or a slow track in on her over the course of the scene. Or literally anything other than just repeat three shots.

From a directing standpoint, it's quantifiably bad.

"It's his first movie!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EY4qZO4vC4

I'll be fair, this has a lot to do with the writing, but this scene is just really, really dull. It's standard coverage of two people talking. Again, nothing in the camera, the editing, or even the blocking of the scene is helping tell this story. If you muted this scene, you would learn nothing, not just because there's no dialogue.

Compare to:

http://youtu.be/fEc_1Zun-FM?t=47s

If you mute that scene, you obviously won't know that they're going to a freakin' dinosaur park (Not that you do even with audio), but you understand exactly how the dynamics of the scene are changing through blocking, through acting, through reaction shots, etc.

I know that seems overly harsh considering the movie's not out yet, but they're releasing scenes, and those scenes should be able to communicate something, even out of context, through more than just dialogue. That's what good direction is all about: using all of the tools of filmmaking to tell an engaging story, even when it is just two people talking.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 26, 2015, 10:22:39 AM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on May 26, 2015, 09:58:55 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 26, 2015, 09:36:55 AMTrevorrow has masterfully brought this franchise back, in a smart and refreshing way. JP has a specific style and the film-makers have tapped into it perfectly for JW.

In fairness, your comment about speaking before the film is out applies equally to what you just said there :) We don't know any of that until the movie comes out.

Yeah I saw that trip just now. Oops. :P

Quote from: SiL on May 26, 2015, 10:21:25 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EY4qZO4vC4

We'll have to disagree about whats being shown in this shot if you mute it. I see a flashy car, a person wearing ridiculously clean clothes, a guy who doesn't mind getting his hands dirty working on a bike which he owns, nothing like the company car behind him. And to boot the use of the camera having Claire standing above Owen when trying to get him to do something. I'm not saying its a masterpiece of directing but for JP4 its perfect.

As you said...

Quote from: SiL on May 26, 2015, 10:21:25 AM
you understand exactly how the dynamics of the scene are changing through blocking, through acting, through reaction shots, etc.

Quote from: SiL on May 26, 2015, 10:21:25 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 26, 2015, 09:36:55 AM
It's like the Indominus is a made up animal or something :P
And that's actually the kind of incredibly poor, lazy reasoning we get behind the scenes. Dinosaurs can't actually be cloned and the reality is we know very, very little about them -- but that didn't stop the team on the first movie putting in years of research into animal movement to ground their entirely unreal animals in reality :)

But we can't assume they stopped doing that for JW. The Indominus is a metaphor for corporate greed, (if anything it mirrors the studios demand to have a Spinosaurus in 3) My guess is it'll feel like a real animal as will the others.

If not we can chalk it off to Genetic tampering. It is science fiction after all. :-*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on May 26, 2015, 10:45:54 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNsa0Vzonr4
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on May 26, 2015, 10:47:26 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 26, 2015, 10:22:39 AM
We'll have to disagree about whats being shown in this shot if you mute it. I see a flashy car, a person wearing ridiculously clean clothes, a guy who doesn't mind getting his hands dirty working on a bike which he owns, nothing like the company car behind him. And to boot the use of the camera having Claire standing above Owen when trying to get him to do something. I'm not saying its a masterpiece of directing but for JP4 its perfect.
That tells you something about the character. What about the scene? He goes above her first, she follows up, he goes back down -- but the dynamic of their responses are never really any different. The blocking is meaningless. What's the nature of their discussion? Who's winning at any given point?

All we know is a stern looking lady is talking to a smartarse guy. That's it. For a minute and a half.

QuoteIf not we can chalk it off to Genetic tampering. It is science fiction after all. :-*
No, we can't. It's supposed to be a living, breathing thing. It's not an animation in the movie. This isn't Who Framed Roger Rabbit?.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 26, 2015, 11:04:03 AM
Quote from: SiL on May 26, 2015, 10:47:26 AM
QuoteIf not we can chalk it off to Genetic tampering. It is science fiction after all. :-*
It's supposed to be a living, breathing thing. It's not an animation in the movie. This isn't Who Framed Roger Rabbit?.

It's supposed to be whatever the creators want it to be.

...and the creators have said...

"It's sort of, like, if the black fish orca got loose and never knew its mother and has been fed from a crane. And when you make a hybrid animal–like, any farmer will tell you that, like, hybrid cows are crazy. So, it's crazy."

http://www.slashfilm.com/colin-trevorrow-jurassic-world-interview/2/

I'm sure its not going to be the equivalent of a talking rabbit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on May 26, 2015, 11:09:46 AM
They're saying it acts differently. That doesn't mean it's suddenly not a flesh and blood thing in terms of the story.

See my earlier comment about if a director wants a TRex running at 50mph, they'll get it whether it looks right or not...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 26, 2015, 11:15:09 AM
Quote from: SiL on May 26, 2015, 11:09:46 AM
See my earlier comment about if a director wants a TRex running at 50mph, they'll get it whether it looks right or not...

Fair enough but again the Indominus is a made up animal.

It gives them the freedom to have it act somewhat differently.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on May 26, 2015, 11:23:03 AM
It doesn't give them the freedom to have it look like an animation. It ruins the suspension of disbelief.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 26, 2015, 11:29:50 AM
Animation looks like animation. I'm shocked. ::)

Spoiler
That said it's damn good animation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QN3AVHGT8I
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 26, 2015, 11:31:27 AM
Quote from: Gilfryd on May 25, 2015, 07:58:13 PM
On the subject of CGI...
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wired.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F05%2Fff_ilm_jurassicpark-e1431992048271.jpg&hash=1f5f22bb3a54e23bf379b8eebbb8b1366da207d9)

QuoteThe Untold Story of ILM, a Titan That Forever Changed Film
http://www.wired.com/2015/05/inside-ilm/

I really like this image. Is this an original still or is it photoshopped to feature one of the new raptors? I'm asking because the one on the counter looks exactly like the one from the Mark Englert SDCC poster.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 26, 2015, 11:34:31 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 26, 2015, 11:31:27 AM
I'm asking because the one on the counter looks exactly like the one from the Mark Englert SDCC poster.

Mark Englert used this still from JP to paint the poster.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 26, 2015, 11:38:32 AM
Ah, that makes sense. On the CGI in the film...I am of the belief that the shots in the trailer are unfinished. The only thing that bothers me is that there doesn't seem to be much weight to the movements of the animals, but I believe in ILM.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 26, 2015, 11:39:44 AM
"TREVORROW: Harsh top light has often not flattered the dinosaurs, but in Jurassic World they're very naked and out in the open—it took that encouragement from Dennis for us to be willing to let these dinosaurs have sunlight hit their skin and not add any additional effects to mask them. It helps the movie feel intensely real."

From: http://www.wired.com/2015/05/inside-ilm/

Going to be interesting to see how it all plays out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 26, 2015, 12:10:46 PM
As long as they aren't glistening, they'll look real.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on May 26, 2015, 03:29:50 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1309.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fs625%2Fatacamadesert86%2Fjurassic_world_ver6_xlg_zpsy5i274ql.jpg&hash=a0f0d3d5e2284bf644e8a400731086dd8b5e3d0e)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 26, 2015, 05:39:39 PM
Quote from: SiL on May 26, 2015, 09:19:22 AM
None of the shots of the creatures moving like like actual animals moving; they look like animation.
I actually disagree heavily here, the movement choreography is excellent. It's harder to judge because the camera moves differently and captures them from specific angles. The action is more complex.

Quote from: SiL on May 26, 2015, 09:19:22 AM
That iRex breaking out of the egg might as well have been a 2D Disney animation overlaid onto the shot as far as its movements go, it's that far removed from how an actual living organism would move.
Funnily enough, I think that is one of the most impressive shots we've seen so far, visually speaking. We can't really judge the movement of it yet, because it's obviously edited to hell and back. It's been featured in 2-3 TV spots so far and it's sped up for dramatic purposes in every single one of them.

Another thing: many of the people that worked on the original film are also working on this one. And when it comes to visual effects I'm talking about Phil Tippett and Dennis Muren, some of the top people in the field.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 27, 2015, 12:19:03 AM
HQ

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg11.hostingpics.net%2Fpics%2F488722juwopch.jpg&hash=f729c8e680c5d52c8e996d49a1b0a10629ad9872)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg11.hostingpics.net%2Fpics%2F703768juwoptr.jpg&hash=818f2526a4c4b1091dea0edfebb1dd1eea2a09fe)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg11.hostingpics.net%2Fpics%2F619291juwopir2.jpg&hash=64df1192915cfee8203ccee81caf97361e68970d)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg11.hostingpics.net%2Fpics%2F444470juwopir1.jpg&hash=a641bfb7a24db6ef2634d2ce92a42e6281d1b790)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on May 27, 2015, 01:10:31 AM
Quote from: ace3g on May 27, 2015, 12:19:03 AM
HQ

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg11.hostingpics.net%2Fpics%2F488722juwopch.jpg&hash=f729c8e680c5d52c8e996d49a1b0a10629ad9872)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg11.hostingpics.net%2Fpics%2F703768juwoptr.jpg&hash=818f2526a4c4b1091dea0edfebb1dd1eea2a09fe)

http://img11.hostingpics.net/pics/619291juwopir2.jpg

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg11.hostingpics.net%2Fpics%2F444470juwopir1.jpg&hash=a641bfb7a24db6ef2634d2ce92a42e6281d1b790)

I always wanted to see a Giganotosaurus in a JP movie, well I guess the I.Rex is what comes closest to that idea  8)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNsa0Vzonr4
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on May 27, 2015, 11:47:26 AM
so i wonder what will turn the raptors. they planned this or wild raptors or i -rex does it (since it has raptor genes, maybe it can communicate). i wouldnt like the latter one
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on May 27, 2015, 12:48:49 PM
I'm hopeful it's just something they planned. Retain their intelligence. They played Starlord all along.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 27, 2015, 02:12:25 PM
I rather like the I.Rex design. It's a suped-up carnosaur.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on May 27, 2015, 04:53:27 PM
Clip with pratt and the raptor squad. People complaining about raptors being so called docile and unthreatening really need to stop crying. This clip proves that they are as dangerous as always but they stand down because of the relationship they have with pratt. Which is a normal thing in nature. Lions can be tamed also but are still dangerous. There was even a guy that had a close bond with a crocodile and could swim with him.

This clip is really nice.

https://www.yahoo.com/movies/v/jurassic-world-clip-piggy-153000867.html (https://www.yahoo.com/movies/v/jurassic-world-clip-piggy-153000867.html)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on May 27, 2015, 06:14:38 PM
The clip itself is great, good, suspenseful, Owen is really intense, but they couldn't have shown the one with the updated cgi? Most of the trailers/ tv spots had better contrast, coloring etc...

New image from inside the old visitors center!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs30.postimg.org%2Fiibv4tald%2FCGB_Vj_AVEAAg_Bv_V.jpg&hash=0e0d457b901135334aa9e177fbd2f2c1e231e357)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on May 27, 2015, 06:31:35 PM
Too many TV spots, it's ridiculous now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 27, 2015, 06:33:04 PM
Don't watch them. Durr.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on May 27, 2015, 07:58:55 PM
I feel bad for the people who have. You've probably seen 90% of the content in the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on May 27, 2015, 08:04:36 PM
why feel sorry? i dont get it, if its a good movie i'll watch it a 100 times anyway if its shit the first impression wont make it any better


about that clip the guy should be dead falling from that high or at least  he should be paralyzed. bit weird
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on May 27, 2015, 08:31:46 PM
Quote from: szkoki on May 27, 2015, 08:04:36 PM
why feel sorry? i dont get it, if its a good movie i'll watch it a 100 times anyway if its shit the first impression wont make it any better


about that clip the guy should be dead falling from that high or at least  he should be paralyzed. bit weird
All good points.  ;D

Still the clip demonstrates that he doesn't actually control the raptors since he does strongly hesitate about going in. Basically he crossed his fingers.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on May 27, 2015, 08:52:18 PM
Quote from: szkoki on May 27, 2015, 08:04:36 PM
why feel sorry? i dont get it, if its a good movie i'll watch it a 100 times anyway if its shit the first impression wont make it any better


about that clip the guy should be dead falling from that high or at least  he should be paralyzed. bit weird
ha well adrenaline can do amazing things.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on May 27, 2015, 09:42:42 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on May 27, 2015, 04:53:27 PM
Clip with pratt and the raptor squad. People complaining about raptors being so called docile and unthreatening really need to stop crying. This clip proves that they are as dangerous as always but they stand down because of the relationship they have with pratt. Which is a normal thing in nature. Lions can be tamed also but are still dangerous. There was even a guy that had a close bond with a crocodile and could swim with him.

This clip is really nice.

https://www.yahoo.com/movies/v/jurassic-world-clip-piggy-153000867.html (https://www.yahoo.com/movies/v/jurassic-world-clip-piggy-153000867.html)

I think the reason no one likes the idea of Raptors being tamed is is the exact same reason why we don't like the idea of Weyland-Yutani taming the Aliens; it just seems unrealistic given the capabilities we've seen from these creatures and it strips them of all the lethality they've built over the years.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 27, 2015, 09:49:39 PM
Quote from: predxeno on May 27, 2015, 09:42:42 PM
I think the reason no one likes the idea of Raptors being tamed is is the exact same reason why we don't like the idea of Weyland-Yutani taming the Aliens; it just seems unrealistic given the capabilities we've seen from these creatures and it strips them of all the lethality they've built over the years.

Raptors and their behaviour are solely based off of animals that are alive on our planet today. That said, they're not tamed. ::)

The Alien is a made up space monster.

Quote from: szkoki on May 27, 2015, 08:04:36 PM
about that clip the guy should be dead falling from that high or at least  he should be paralyzed. bit weird

No weirder than Tim surviving the car being shoved off a ledge into a treetop. Or Tim survive having the same vehicle chase him down a tree and fall on top of him. Or Tim being electrocuted by 10,000 volts and surviving. Hyper-reality.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on May 27, 2015, 09:51:42 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 27, 2015, 09:49:39 PM
Quote from: predxeno on May 27, 2015, 09:42:42 PM
I think the reason no one likes the idea of Raptors being tamed is is the exact same reason why we don't like the idea of Weyland-Yutani taming the Aliens; it just seems unrealistic given the capabilities we've seen from these creatures and it strips them of all the lethality they've built over the years.

Raptors and their behaviour are solely based off of animals that are alive on our planet today. That said, they're not tamed. ::)

The Alien is a made up space monster.

It's debatable how realistic the raptors are given their genetic engineering with frog DNA and the fact that they're like 2x the size of normal raptors and for some reason have no feathers whatsoever. :P  Long story short though, the raptors have made quite an impact on audiences everywhere; nobody even knew what a Velociraptor was until Jurassic Park unveiled them, and like the Aliens they are quite possibly scarier than the T-Rex itself.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 27, 2015, 09:57:20 PM
Quote from: predxeno on May 27, 2015, 09:51:42 PM
It's debatable how realistic the raptors are given their genetic engineering with frog DNA and the fact that they're like 2x the size of normal raptors and for some reason have no feathers whatsoever.

Doesn't change their behaviours.

Just uploaded my TLW commentary.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfXj1VKjzuU
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 27, 2015, 11:39:49 PM
The audio in that clip is odd...Pratt's accent is more "country/southern" than any of the other spots/clips.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HappyAlien on May 28, 2015, 07:35:59 AM
Quote from: predxeno on May 27, 2015, 09:51:42 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 27, 2015, 09:49:39 PM
Quote from: predxeno on May 27, 2015, 09:42:42 PM
I think the reason no one likes the idea of Raptors being tamed is is the exact same reason why we don't like the idea of Weyland-Yutani taming the Aliens; it just seems unrealistic given the capabilities we've seen from these creatures and it strips them of all the lethality they've built over the years.

Raptors and their behaviour are solely based off of animals that are alive on our planet today. That said, they're not tamed. ::)

The Alien is a made up space monster.

It's debatable how realistic the raptors are given their genetic engineering with frog DNA and the fact that they're like 2x the size of normal raptors and for some reason have no feathers whatsoever. :P  Long story short though, the raptors have made quite an impact on audiences everywhere; nobody even knew what a Velociraptor was until Jurassic Park unveiled them, and like the Aliens they are quite possibly scarier than the T-Rex itself.

The Raptors in the films are many times the size of real Velociraptors but they are actually smaller than the UtahRaptor which was discovered in 1975 but it wasn't until the early 90's that they discovered more remains. The  biggest one was 2m tall and  7m(21 feet) long and weighing just under 500kg (estimated). This makes it similar in size to the raptors in the film but actually bigger.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on May 29, 2015, 05:06:32 AM
Quote from: predxeno on May 27, 2015, 09:42:42 PM
Quote from: Snowdog on May 27, 2015, 04:53:27 PM
Clip with pratt and the raptor squad. People complaining about raptors being so called docile and unthreatening really need to stop crying. This clip proves that they are as dangerous as always but they stand down because of the relationship they have with pratt. Which is a normal thing in nature. Lions can be tamed also but are still dangerous. There was even a guy that had a close bond with a crocodile and could swim with him.

This clip is really nice.

https://www.yahoo.com/movies/v/jurassic-world-clip-piggy-153000867.html (https://www.yahoo.com/movies/v/jurassic-world-clip-piggy-153000867.html)

I think the reason no one likes the idea of Raptors being tamed is is the exact same reason why we don't like the idea of Weyland-Yutani taming the Aliens; it just seems unrealistic given the capabilities we've seen from these creatures and it strips them of all the lethality they've built over the years.

(https://cdn.artstation.rocks/p/assets/images/images/000/535/156/large/marek-okon-under-control-1920.jpg?1425945745)

I dunno about you but I can get behind it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on May 29, 2015, 07:20:46 AM
I'm not sure how well that would actually go down with the majority. Hell, I don't know how I feel about it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on May 29, 2015, 09:19:56 AM
With the Raptors, one thing they have always pushed is their intelligence, so training them actually fits. We tame lions, tigers, bears, dogs -- all dangerous animals, but intelligent enough to be trained. And all still lethal and incredibly capable of murdering us (Yes, even dogs.)

The Alien, though, has always had some question as to the nature of its intelligence. It's more like a cross between a spider, a shark, and an ant hive. None of these things are terribly stupid (except, maybe, sharks), but you're not about to train a trap door spider to do tricks.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on May 29, 2015, 09:41:32 AM
Quote from: SiL on May 29, 2015, 09:19:56 AMWe tame lions, tigers, bears, dogs -- all dangerous animals, but intelligent enough to be trained.

People keep citing those examples, but none of those actively hunt people, which is the difference for me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on May 29, 2015, 10:01:08 AM
They can, if given an opportunity to lose their fear of humans and see them as a food source. There have been plenty of lions (even healthy ones) throughout history that have become specialised in hunting humans.

JP's raptors were given those opportunities, we see one of them attacking its captors in the opening scene. How different could they have been with a handler who hand-reared them from birth, understood their social code, and was skilled enough to read their various moods and behave accordingly, just like big cat handlers do?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on May 29, 2015, 10:08:18 AM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on May 29, 2015, 09:41:32 AM
People keep citing those examples, but none of those actively hunt people, which is the difference for me.
Only because we don't tend to live in their hunting grounds -- when we stray, we absolutely are on the menu. On Isla Sorna, what else is there? The Raptors break out of their cage, and the first thing they come across is people. On Isla Nublar, the humans literally walk the one place they're not meant to. In JP3, the Raptors don't really hunt the humans, they just want their egg back.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on May 29, 2015, 10:13:58 AM
Quote from: SiL on May 29, 2015, 10:08:18 AMOnly because we don't tend to live in their hunting grounds -- when we stray, we absolutely are on the menu.

Straying into a dangerous animals' territory and being killed is not the same as being hunted. They're two totally different concepts. In the JP films, several dinosaurs actively hunt people, pursuing them over long distances to kill and eat them.

Quote from: Vertigo on May 29, 2015, 10:01:08 AMThey can, if given an opportunity to lose their fear of humans and see them as a food source. There have been plenty of lions (even healthy ones) throughout history that have become specialised in hunting humans.

There haven't been "plenty" at all. Instances of lions eating people are incredibly rare. And the occasional opportunistic lion eating a couple of people is vastly different from a species that instinctively hunts people.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on May 29, 2015, 10:47:53 AM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on May 29, 2015, 10:13:58 AM
Straying into a dangerous animals' territory and being killed is not the same as being hunted.
But that's all that happens with the Raptors in the movie. Every single one of the films, people walk into their territory.

JP: Humans literally walk into them trying to turn the power back on. Raptors follow them a fairly short distance (The power station isn't that far from the visitor centre, the film makes a point of this).

TLW: Humans, again, literally walk into their hunting ground. They're explicitly told to avoid the middle of the island because that's where the predators hunt, and they're explicitly told not to go into the tall grass for the same reason. Again, it's not far from the tall grass to the visitor centre.

JPIII: Yet again, the humans run into the Raptors. This time, they take an egg, which is explicitly given as the reason the Raptors follow them so much in the film. They aren't hunting them just for food, they want their baby back.

The Raptors have never been shown to excessively hunt humans. Ellie and Muldoon encounter the Raptors, the Raptors follow her back to the visitor centre nearby. The InGen peeps go into the long grass, Malcolm et al. follow soon after, get followed to the visitor centre. And so on.

The only dinosaur portrayed as needlessly hunting people is the Spinosaurus (and I only say that because I can't remember the film that well), and arguably the T-Rex in the first movie -- but even then it was clearly just hunting around.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on May 29, 2015, 10:54:06 AM
new control room clip
http://jurassicworld.org/?id=306
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on May 29, 2015, 10:56:12 AM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on May 29, 2015, 10:13:58 AM
Quote from: SiL on May 29, 2015, 10:08:18 AMOnly because we don't tend to live in their hunting grounds -- when we stray, we absolutely are on the menu.

Straying into a dangerous animals' territory and being killed is not the same as being hunted. They're two totally different concepts. In the JP films, several dinosaurs actively hunt people, pursuing them over long distances to kill and eat them.

Quote from: Vertigo on May 29, 2015, 10:01:08 AMThey can, if given an opportunity to lose their fear of humans and see them as a food source. There have been plenty of lions (even healthy ones) throughout history that have become specialised in hunting humans.

There haven't been "plenty" at all. Instances of lions eating people are incredibly rare. And the occasional opportunistic lion eating a couple of people is vastly different from a species that instinctively hunts people.

Wikipedia:
"550–700 people are attacked by lions every year."
"Man-eating lions have been recorded to actively enter human villages at night as well as during the day to acquire prey. ... Cases in Lindi have been documented where lions seize humans from the centre of substantial villages."
Famously the Tsavo lion pair killed over a hundred people in the late 19th century.

Widening the net to other members of Panthera, there are four tigers and leopards recorded to have killed over a hundred people. Tigers allegedly killed over a thousand people a year in the early 20th century, and are estimated to have killed 373,000 people since 1800.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 29, 2015, 11:07:31 AM
Welcome, to Jurassic World.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fthenosebleeds.nextimpulsemedia.netdna-cdn.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F08%2FLion-Attack.gif&hash=1cf0288d7f530bd87fd64bfdbbff24fb64a1161a)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on May 29, 2015, 11:23:11 AM
See, that.

I find it strange that I'm one of the few people being critical of the movie here, yet I'm one of the ones who has absolutely no problem with the raptors :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on May 29, 2015, 01:59:36 PM
Eh, it still seems silly to me in the film. What's more dangerous, a lion or a raptor? I'd rather be around neither, but I know which scares me more. Making them trained lessens that for me.

You guys don't agree and that's fine. But I think the image of a man leading raptors into battle on a motorcycle is just... stupid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on May 29, 2015, 02:44:03 PM
its a dino cloning movie topic on a site wich is about space soldiers and space monsters with 30-60 yrs old fanboys posting every day, its all stupid :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on May 29, 2015, 02:48:08 PM
I know that the only animal that is above us on the food chain (that sees humans as a normal food stuff) is the polar bear.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: jacc.90 on May 29, 2015, 04:27:51 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7rZTZBOrqQ
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 29, 2015, 04:36:42 PM
 :D :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 29, 2015, 08:33:04 PM
I'm bursting with excitement! Two weeks!!! :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on May 29, 2015, 10:24:39 PM
Yet everyone here is forgetting about the almighty cannibal. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on May 29, 2015, 10:40:07 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on May 29, 2015, 01:59:36 PM
Eh, it still seems silly to me in the film. What's more dangerous, a lion or a raptor? I'd rather be around neither, but I know which scares me more. Making them trained lessens that for me.
I agree that the image of them following Pratt on the bike is a dumb image, but just because these specific Raptors are tame doesn't mean they all are. They're still vicious. These ones just do tricks.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 30, 2015, 12:19:08 AM
Quote from: SiL on May 29, 2015, 10:40:07 PM
I agree that the image of them following Pratt on the bike is a dumb image, but just because these specific Raptors are tame doesn't mean they all are. They're still vicious. These ones just do tricks.

:-* :P

"Chris Pratt's character is doing behavioral research on the raptors. They aren't trained, they can't do tricks. He's just trying to figure out the limits of the relationship between these highly intelligent creatures and human beings. If people don't think there's potential in those ideas, maybe they won't like this movie. But I ask them to give it a chance."

http://www.slashfilm.com/jurassic-world-plot-details-colin-treverrow/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on May 30, 2015, 12:48:21 AM
Point was these ones will follow (basic) commands. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on May 30, 2015, 04:48:47 AM
Any reviews yet for JW?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on May 30, 2015, 08:04:45 AM
Booked my tickets, IMAX 3D. Haven't seen a film in 3D since Titanic, and the only time I've been to an IMAX before was for Avatar.

Got my concerns about the film, but Jurassic Park is an exceptionally special, formative film for me, like Star Wars is for people who grew up in the '80s. First sequel in 14 years warrants special treatment.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 30, 2015, 08:07:37 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on May 30, 2015, 08:04:45 AM
First sequel in 14 years warrants special treatment.
Couldn't agree more.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Sozin on May 30, 2015, 08:12:43 AM
Will be giving this a look in two weeks. Very excited to see Nublar again. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 30, 2015, 09:03:47 AM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on May 30, 2015, 04:48:47 AM
Any reviews yet for JW?

Shit it's about that time huh? I'm kinda scared about them.

And yes just booked my tickets June 11  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Sozin on May 30, 2015, 09:34:45 AM
About the raptors...

Spoiler
There was an article in Empire that implied that they will tear some people up in the lab. Maybe Wu will meet the same fate as in the book.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Wrecktangle on May 30, 2015, 10:08:18 AM
I'm taking a wild stab in the dark and say 69-72% on RT.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 31, 2015, 01:05:14 PM
I've been invited to the LA premier on the 9th.

I'll let you guys know how it went.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 31, 2015, 02:30:41 PM
I like this.

(https://scontent-ord1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xap1/v/t1.0-9/1395804_10204462524305001_5915291976734869904_n.jpg?oh=1820ddf4111b463a74dcef461b68b0ca&oe=55F2BE00)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on May 31, 2015, 09:04:55 PM
Yeah, I always felt the ethics on genetic engineering/modification were very well expressed in the book; is it truly a good idea to alter the DNA of an animal (or human) just to make it more aesthetically pleasing for marketing purposes?  That sounds like a very vain reason to get into the field.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 31, 2015, 09:20:55 PM
Crichton rocked the world.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on May 31, 2015, 09:47:06 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 31, 2015, 01:05:14 PM
I've been invited to the LA premier on the 9th.

I'll let you guys know how it went.

Waaaaaaaaa!? Lucky! June 11th for me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on May 31, 2015, 10:05:11 PM
The Version 4.4 chapter in Jurassic Park is widely misinterpreted/misremembered, and that particular quote isn't from the book as far as I remember.

The whole point of the chapter was that Wu wanted to make the dinosaurs conform to what the public expected to see - make them slow, lumbering, dumb - as they'd already made safety-related hormonal and genetic manipulations to stop the dinosaurs breeding, and to kill them off if they were deprived of InGen-sourced food. But Hammond wanted authentic dinosaurs so that's more or less what they got.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 01, 2015, 02:42:28 AM
It could be argued they aren't really authentic though. In brief, the environment has changed so much that the dinosaurs aren't behaving the same way they did in the Mesozoic and that they have frog DNA means they aren't "whole" dinosaurs. Their genes aren't pure.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on Jun 01, 2015, 09:18:03 AM
The point is they were aiming for it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jun 01, 2015, 09:21:27 AM
http://www.slashfilm.com/jurassic-world-early-buzz/

Early buzz from the premiere is positive.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 01, 2015, 10:26:46 AM
Excellent, excellent. Love the picture Trevorrow posted.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 01, 2015, 11:40:31 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVlNTpQjS7Y
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 01, 2015, 12:20:53 PM
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Jun 01, 2015, 09:21:27 AM
http://www.slashfilm.com/jurassic-world-early-buzz/

Early buzz from the premiere is positive.

This is extremely encouraging. There's been a lot of negativity lately.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jun 01, 2015, 12:26:40 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 01, 2015, 12:20:53 PM
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Jun 01, 2015, 09:21:27 AM
http://www.slashfilm.com/jurassic-world-early-buzz/

Early buzz from the premiere is positive.

This is extremely encouraging. There's been a lot of negativity lately.

Welcome to Jurassic Park...

Sorry. I mean, Welcome to the Internet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 01, 2015, 12:44:30 PM
Lol, yeah. I'm currently reading a fantastic book called Jurassic Park and Philosophy. It's a collection of short essays analyzing the film through a philosophical lens. http://www.amazon.ca/Jurassic-Park-Philosophy-Truth-Terrifying/dp/0812698479/ref=sr_1_1

My favourite piece so far is the one discussing the feathered dinosaur issue. The author talks about why the filmmakers specifically created monsters rather than dinosaurs to appease to the popular image of what dinosaurs are, yet that only reinforces the hyperreal world we choose to live in versus the real one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 01, 2015, 02:37:02 PM
Two new tracks released from the score...

http://www.ew.com/article/2015/06/01/jurassic-world-score-michael-giacchino?hootPostID=1d5a37528f344f0d70e2ace3f514c324

Utter perfection. Joyful tears building. :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 01, 2015, 02:50:04 PM
#JurassicJune begins today as well as 30 days of dinosaurs!! Instagram will come alive ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 01, 2015, 02:57:47 PM
I'm contributing again to #JurassicJune ;D Playing The Lost World: JP on PS1.

Here's Part 1...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kv99M-7F80A
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jun 01, 2015, 03:03:53 PM
I remember this game. Don't think I got past level 1.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 01, 2015, 03:30:01 PM
The best JP game I've played was Warpath for the PS1. Oh, the button mashing...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 01, 2015, 09:32:53 PM
Operation Genesis by far.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Jun 01, 2015, 11:43:50 PM
Anyone remember Scan Command?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GC2ZQTY-lbw
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Alien Predator on Jun 02, 2015, 12:53:20 AM
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Jun 01, 2015, 03:03:53 PM
I remember this game. Don't think I got past level 1.

Same here.  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Jun 02, 2015, 02:03:42 AM
Quote from: Guan Thwei 1992 on Jun 02, 2015, 12:53:20 AM
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Jun 01, 2015, 03:03:53 PM
I remember this game. Don't think I got past level 1.

Same here.  ;D

Oh, I remember this game; I had it for Sega Saturn (the original gory version, the PS1 version took away the blood but added a new move for the Rex and a bonus level for him as well).  This was one of the toughest games of my early childhood and I had to watch my dad beat it, but when I learned all the tricks of the game I became a MASTER at it.  I still remember the Sega Saturn code that unlocks all levels (we got codes to keep our progress since the console didn't have memory cards); XAXYYYYYZXYY.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 02, 2015, 03:01:28 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Jun 01, 2015, 11:43:50 PM
Anyone remember Scan Command?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GC2ZQTY-lbw

OMG! Lol damn you just took me back.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jun 02, 2015, 07:30:01 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Jun 02, 2015, 02:03:42 AM
I still remember the Sega Saturn code that unlocks all levels (we got codes to keep our progress since the console didn't have memory cards); XAXYYYYYZXYY.

Not all. The Saturn and PS1 both had memory cards.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Jun 02, 2015, 07:32:19 AM
Yeah, but I think they were still a relatively new thing back then. :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 02, 2015, 07:49:31 AM
The T-rex episode of the series is ridiculously frustrating.

Here is my commentary for JP3.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYDPUnc-vNQ
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 02, 2015, 04:46:16 PM
Hey A3, could I interest you in a live stream of one or more JP films together?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 02, 2015, 06:17:34 PM
Yeah man. DM me and we can sort a date. :-*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 02, 2015, 09:41:43 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Evou69ls-yw
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alienseseses on Jun 02, 2015, 10:14:36 PM
Quote from: predxeno on Jun 01, 2015, 11:43:50 PM
Anyone remember Scan Command?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GC2ZQTY-lbw
AH I had that! Could never get it to work.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 03, 2015, 12:54:03 AM
new clip

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kltVPhhza7U



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYAAM0xQ_tc
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 03, 2015, 03:03:53 AM
9 days  :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 03:59:09 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=proODp0-kgk

One of their better ones IMO.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 03, 2015, 04:07:48 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 01, 2015, 09:32:53 PM
Operation Genesis by far.
Cant get it to run on windows 8. :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 08:35:12 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 03:59:09 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=proODp0-kgk

One of their better ones IMO.

There needs to be an everything wrong with this everything wrong video...

...Ooo the temptation.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 03, 2015, 08:44:57 AM
There is a screening here on the 10th.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 09:04:51 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7J6ca9Xbd3o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Jun 03, 2015, 10:16:12 AM
Anyone else have this back in the day?
http://www.amazon.com/Jurassic-World-Dinosaur-Field-Guide/dp/0553536850/ref=sr_1_5?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1433323270&sr=1-5&keywords=jurassic+park

A revised version is out now and I'm seriously tempted to pick it up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 03, 2015, 10:20:18 AM
Quote from: Gilfryd on Jun 03, 2015, 10:16:12 AM
Anyone else have this back in the day?
http://www.amazon.com/Jurassic-World-Dinosaur-Field-Guide/dp/0553536850/ref=sr_1_5?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1433323270&sr=1-5&keywords=jurassic+park

A revised version is out now and I'm seriously tempted to pick it up.

Holy crap, I think I did. It came with a little poster, I think. Very cool book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 03, 2015, 11:21:54 AM
Amazing stuff right here, the dinosaur looks and acts so realistic, if only it looked that great in the gyrosphere scenes (I haven't seen the film obviously but still...)

Jurassic World Virtual Reality

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEKjamS9cTs
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 11:56:29 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 08:35:12 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 03:59:09 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=proODp0-kgk

One of their better ones IMO.

There needs to be an everything wrong with this everything wrong video...

...Ooo the temptation.

What didn't you like about it?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 03, 2015, 12:06:48 PM
I really don't think it's meant to be taken too seriously. :P

Though the video did provoke a varying mix of "Oh yeah, that is pretty stupid" and "Oh shut up, you're incredibly stupid" for me.



Quote from: Xan21 on Jun 03, 2015, 11:21:54 AM
JW Virtual Reality video

Amazing stuff right here, the dinosaur looks and acts so realistic, if only it looked that great in the gyrosphere scenes (I haven't seen the film obviously but still...)

Jurassic World Virtual Reality

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEKjamS9cTs
[close]

That does look utterly stunning. What's the deal behind this, is it a CG environment created by JW's effects team, or by an independent team? Or is it actually a photo-mapped environment? Is it just developed as publicity for Samsung and Universal?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 12:26:26 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jun 03, 2015, 12:06:48 PM
I really don't think it's meant to be taken too seriously. :P

Though the video did provoke a varying mix of "Oh yeah, that is pretty stupid" and "Oh shut up, you're incredibly stupid" for me.


Most of them are like that. But this one was pretty accurate IMO. I never noticed the inconsistency with the Rex stomping until he pointed it out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 03, 2015, 12:31:25 PM
Lost World is indeed really stupidly put together in every segment, how can like this over JP3 is beyond me, and that vid isnt their best, also he even could bash this movie much more. That shows its just for entertainment.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 12:45:21 PM
I'll still choose it over JP3. At least TLW has a run time of two hours and so it doesn't feel like it has an abrupt ending. Also, the ending isn't so "WHAT THE f**k?!", what with the army showing up out of literally nowhere. And yes, I'm still bothered by the killing of the Rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 12:53:11 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 11:56:29 AM
What didn't you like about it?

Too many to mention but here's a few I thought were wrong...

"Sin 7" about them breeding the animals on Sorna and moving them to Nublar. They explained: "Yeah, no you didn't. Or else you wouldn't have had eggs in the lab in the first movie, where we see them hatch and whatnot. You wouldn't have kept all that DNA on Isla Nublar, either."

They failed to observe the tour ride Grant (and co) were on which was designed for tourists to observe how they breed dinosaurs, beginning with a cartoon, followed by a small tour of a scaled down lab in which they hatch some dinosaurs to up the wow factor.
Sorna is the "factory floor" where they can observe, study, and iron out any problems with the animals before moving them to the park.

Plus all that DNA (which I presume they mean the embryos Nedry steals) is kept on Nublar as stock for the showroom lab. The large cloning facilities and research centres are on Site B.

"Sin 42" a guy puts the noose around the Pachy's head and another guy fires a tranq which causes it to run. It's all on screen, they just decide to leave out a crucial shot in this video to make a joke. Again, joke is lost because its based on nothing.

"Sin 65" Malcolm presumes something bad is going to happen because of what Sarah was saying about the behaviour of the Rex's, not because he can physically see something coming.

"Sin 82" makes no sense. I don't know where they're getting that sexist vibe from Burke. If he was sexist in the film it would be a funnier sin, considering they'd be mocking his out-dated character outlook. But he's not so...

"Sin 93" Impact tremors are a territorial thing for the JP Rex. Whilst roaming they create impact tremors to warn other animals of their approach. Much like how elephants communicate. When hunting the Rexes are deadly silent. Perfect ambush predators.

"Sin 100" No one hears the first three victims of the raptors in the long-grass because the raptors are excellent hunters. How is that a sin?

"Sin 114" the complaint about Sarah not hurting her back is fine. So why didn't they count the thousands of times Tim should have been seriously injured in the "Everything wrong with Jurassic Park" video? This is an example of why people watch the original with rose tinted glasses.

"Sin 121" is it hard to imagine the Rex following someone into the cargo hold and a dying person managing to close the doors before they bit the dust?

Poking fun at movies is fun n' all, even the great ones, but CinemaSins are often adding to the pot of misguided views of movies. The Lost World is just another victim.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 01:14:11 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 12:53:11 PM
"Sin 7" about them breeding the animals on Sorna and moving them to Nublar. They explained: "Yeah, no you didn't. Or else you wouldn't have had eggs in the lab in the first movie, where we see them hatch and whatnot. You wouldn't have kept all that DNA on Isla Nublar, either."

They failed to observe the tour ride Grant (and co) were on which was designed for tourists to observe how they breed dinosaurs, beginning with a cartoon, followed by a small tour of a scaled down lab in which they hatch some dinosaurs to up the wow factor.
Sorna is the "factory floor" where they can observe, study, and iron out any problems with the animals before moving them to the park.

Plus all that DNA (which I presume they mean the embryos Nedry steals) is kept on Nublar as stock for the showroom lab. The large cloning facilities and research centres are on Site B.

True point. I'll give you that one.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 12:53:11 PM
"Sin 42" a guy puts the noose around the Pachy's head and another guy fires a tranq which causes it to run. It's all on screen, they just decide to leave out a crucial shot in this video to make a joke. Again, joke is lost because its based on nothing.

I'd have to rewatch it but I'm pretty sure that's how it happened in the film, as it's presented here. I can buy that it's a tranq gun, but the way it's filmed creates the impression that the gun fired a line. The problem isn't the sin video, it's TLW's editing.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 12:53:11 PM
"Sin 65" Malcolm presumes something bad is going to happen because of what Sarah was saying about the behaviour of the Rex's, not because he can physically see something coming.

Then why does he stand up and very clearly look out the window instead of at her? His expression signifies something is coming at him.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 12:53:11 PM
"Sin 82" makes no sense. I don't know where they're getting that sexist vibe from Burke. If he was sexist in the film it would be a funnier sin, considering they'd be mocking his out-dated character outlook. But he's not so...

Agreed. I commented on that one as well. It was very random. Maybe Jeremy's a feminist, who knows.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 12:53:11 PM
"Sin 93" Impact tremors are a territorial thing for the JP Rex. Whilst roaming they create impact tremors to warn other animals of their approach. Much like how elephants communicate. When hunting the Rexes are deadly silent. Perfect ambush predators.

Oh come on. Do you mean to tell me they can physically control how much weight they put into each step depending on where they're hunting? That's absurd.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 12:53:11 PM
"Sin 100" No one hears the first three victims of the raptors in the long-grass because the raptors are excellent hunters. How is that a sin?

The second and third victim were directly behind the people in front of them. They don't go down silently. There's no way the people in front of them didn't hear that.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 12:53:11 PM
"Sin 114" the complaint about Sarah not hurting her back is fine. So why didn't they count the thousands of times Tim should have been seriously injured in the "Everything wrong with Jurassic Park" video? This is an example of why people watch the original with rose tinted glasses.

He mentions that Tim isn't grounded when holding onto the fence so the shocking is questionable. As for "thousands of times", I counted three: jeep falling into the tree, jeep landing on top of him and Grant, being shocked on the fence. I'm not counting the Rex attack because we can see him and his sister being injured as it's happening.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 12:53:11 PM
"Sin 121" is it hard to imagine the Rex following someone into the cargo hold and a dying person managing to close the doors before they bit the dust?

Yes because first, it's never clear in the film how all of those crew members died. Second of all, who exactly did the Rex follow into the cargo hold? We never see any bodies in it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 03, 2015, 01:55:11 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 08:35:12 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 03:59:09 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=proODp0-kgk

One of their better ones IMO.

There needs to be an everything wrong with this everything wrong video...

...Ooo the temptation.

Ugh I hate Cinema Sins. I feel like a lot of times he doesn't comprehend how one scene leads to another or he flat out just missed something and then he gives them an unfair point. And even when his points are valid a lot of the times the stuff he points out are of no real relevance and are in the background but seeing them still ruins the scenes next time you see the movie it's from. I've only seen a few of his videos and stopped because he can ruin great scenes from great movies just by pointing out things that are not supposed to even be in focus.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 01:14:11 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 12:53:11 PM
"Sin 7" about them breeding the animals on Sorna and moving them to Nublar. They explained: "Yeah, no you didn't. Or else you wouldn't have had eggs in the lab in the first movie, where we see them hatch and whatnot. You wouldn't have kept all that DNA on Isla Nublar, either."

They failed to observe the tour ride Grant (and co) were on which was designed for tourists to observe how they breed dinosaurs, beginning with a cartoon, followed by a small tour of a scaled down lab in which they hatch some dinosaurs to up the wow factor.
Sorna is the "factory floor" where they can observe, study, and iron out any problems with the animals before moving them to the park.

Plus all that DNA (which I presume they mean the embryos Nedry steals) is kept on Nublar as stock for the showroom lab. The large cloning facilities and research centres are on Site B.

True point. I'll give you that one.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 12:53:11 PM
"Sin 42" a guy puts the noose around the Pachy's head and another guy fires a tranq which causes it to run. It's all on screen, they just decide to leave out a crucial shot in this video to make a joke. Again, joke is lost because its based on nothing.

I'd have to rewatch it but I'm pretty sure that's how it happened in the film, as it's presented here. I can buy that it's a tranq gun, but the way it's filmed creates the impression that the gun fired a line. The problem isn't the sin video, it's TLW's editing.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 12:53:11 PM
"Sin 65" Malcolm presumes something bad is going to happen because of what Sarah was saying about the behaviour of the Rex's, not because he can physically see something coming.

Then why does he stand up and very clearly look out the window instead of at her? His expression signifies something is coming at him.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 12:53:11 PM
"Sin 82" makes no sense. I don't know where they're getting that sexist vibe from Burke. If he was sexist in the film it would be a funnier sin, considering they'd be mocking his out-dated character outlook. But he's not so...

Agreed. I commented on that one as well. It was very random. Maybe Jeremy's a feminist, who knows.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 12:53:11 PM
"Sin 93" Impact tremors are a territorial thing for the JP Rex. Whilst roaming they create impact tremors to warn other animals of their approach. Much like how elephants communicate. When hunting the Rexes are deadly silent. Perfect ambush predators.

Oh come on. Do you mean to tell me they can physically control how much weight they put into each step depending on where they're hunting? That's absurd.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 12:53:11 PM
"Sin 100" No one hears the first three victims of the raptors in the long-grass because the raptors are excellent hunters. How is that a sin?

The second and third victim were directly behind the people in front of them. They don't go down silently. There's no way the people in front of them didn't hear that.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 12:53:11 PM
"Sin 114" the complaint about Sarah not hurting her back is fine. So why didn't they count the thousands of times Tim should have been seriously injured in the "Everything wrong with Jurassic Park" video? This is an example of why people watch the original with rose tinted glasses.

He mentions that Tim isn't grounded when holding onto the fence so the shocking is questionable. As for "thousands of times", I counted three: jeep falling into the tree, jeep landing on top of him and Grant, being shocked on the fence. I'm not counting the Rex attack because we can see him and his sister being injured as it's happening.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 12:53:11 PM
"Sin 121" is it hard to imagine the Rex following someone into the cargo hold and a dying person managing to close the doors before they bit the dust?

Yes because first, it's never clear in the film how all of those crew members died. Second of all, who exactly did the Rex follow into the cargo hold? We never see any bodies in it.

About the Rex, it's not controlling your weight it's about controlling the way you step. I'm sure they can be silent if they wanted to kinda like us and other animals can be stealthy and step lightly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 02:10:42 PM
A seven-ton animal is not going to be stealthy about anything. And yes, it weighs more than an elephant.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 03:02:23 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 01:14:11 PM
I'd have to rewatch it but I'm pretty sure that's how it happened in the film, as it's presented here. I can buy that it's a tranq gun, but the way it's filmed creates the impression that the gun fired a line. The problem isn't the sin video, it's TLW's editing.

Nope heres the clip with the shot of the guy putting the noose around its neck. It's at 1:34. He shoots, it runs pulling the line, gets exhausted and then you hear the clicking of the line retracting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVxZbrUaMD0

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 01:14:11 PM
Then why does he stand up and very clearly look out the window instead of at her? His expression signifies something is coming at him.

Its a moment of dramatic effect. You're reading way too into this.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 01:14:11 PM
Oh come on. Do you mean to tell me they can physically control how much weight they put into each step depending on where they're hunting? That's absurd.

Not about how much weight they apply, could be a vibration they send through their bodies into the ground. 
Like this... skip to 1:49.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uyiw940wpic

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 01:14:11 PM
The second and third victim were directly behind the people in front of them. They don't go down silently. There's no way the people in front of them didn't hear that.

The raptors silently take down three people at the back of the group, the fourth attack alerts everyone else.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cr1MvzAr26E

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 01:14:11 PM
As for "thousands of times", I counted three:

Missed the ridiculous exaggeration? ;D

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 01:14:11 PM
it's never clear in the film how all of those crew members died.

Death by T-rex. Thrown overboard, eaten and/or mauled.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 01:14:11 PM
Second of all, who exactly did the Rex follow into the cargo hold? We never see any bodies in it.

Is it so hard to imagine it eating someone? :laugh:

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 02:10:42 PM
A seven-ton animal is not going to be stealthy about anything. And yes, it weighs more than an elephant.

Who knows, but in the fictional world of JP they sure can be for menacing effect.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 03, 2015, 03:02:51 PM
october 10th, 20:30pm is the time. i bought the tickets before premiere, too bad the movie will be dubbed


is it true that the first screening in the USA is only on 13th of june?

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 03:13:45 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 03:02:23 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 01:14:11 PM
I'd have to rewatch it but I'm pretty sure that's how it happened in the film, as it's presented here. I can buy that it's a tranq gun, but the way it's filmed creates the impression that the gun fired a line. The problem isn't the sin video, it's TLW's editing.

Nope heres the clip with the shot of the guy putting the noose around its neck. It's at 1:34. He shoots, it runs pulling the line, gets exhausted and then you hear the clicking of the line retracting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVxZbrUaMD0

I blame bad editing, but I see it now that you've pointed it out.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 03:02:23 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 01:14:11 PM
Then why does he stand up and very clearly look out the window instead of at her? His expression signifies something is coming at him.

Its a moment of dramatic effect. You're reading way too into this.

If I go with your explanation, then I have to assume Malcolm's a psychic who read Sarah's mind and was able to deduce a Rex attack was coming at that precise moment. That's beyond ludicrous. 

Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 03:02:23 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 01:14:11 PM
The second and third victim were directly behind the people in front of them. They don't go down silently. There's no way the people in front of them didn't hear that.

The raptors silently take down three people at the back of the group, the fourth attack alerts everyone else.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cr1MvzAr26E

The fourth attack wasn't any louder than the third or second.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 03:02:23 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 01:14:11 PM
it's never clear in the film how all of those crew members died.

Death by T-rex. Thrown overboard, eaten and/or mauled.

So a T.Rex that's secure in the cargo hold either killed the BRIDGE CREW by hyper-extending its body a la Mr. Fantastic or broke free, killed everyone, then went back to hunker in its bunker. Right.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 03:02:23 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 01:14:11 PM
Second of all, who exactly did the Rex follow into the cargo hold? We never see any bodies in it.

Is it so hard to imagine it eating someone? :laugh:

There would've been a sign of something. The Rex ate Gennaro but Muldoon and Ellie still found traces of him lying around. Also, why on Earth would anyone go into the cargo hold? I would think carrying a T.rex means stay the f**k away from that general area.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 03:02:23 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 02:10:42 PM
A seven-ton animal is not going to be stealthy about anything. And yes, it weighs more than an elephant.

Who knows, but in the fictional world of JP they sure can be for menacing effect.

And thus it creates a plot-hole, ergo a sin.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 03:22:06 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 03:13:45 PM
I blame bad editing, but I see it now that you've pointed it out.

If you can see it how is that bad editing?

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 01:14:11 PM
If I go with your explanation, then I have to assume Malcolm's a psychic who read Sarah's mind and was able to deduce a Rex attack was coming at that precise moment. That's beyond ludicrous.

Or he heard her say they're very smart when it comes to protecting their young and deduces that bad things will happen moments before they actually do. No more ludicrous than him swanning about a theme park saying its going to hell 24 hours before it does.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 01:14:11 PM
So a T.Rex that's secure in the cargo hold either killed the BRIDGE CREW by hyper-extending its body a la Mr. Fantastic or broke free, killed everyone, then went back to hunker in its bunker. Right.

My god dude, watch the movie the rex didn't start in the cargo hold. The broken restraints are seen on deck. It woke up during the trip because Roland didn't administer the correct dosage of tranquilliser.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 01:14:11 PM
There would've been a sign of something. The Rex ate Gennaro but Muldoon and Ellie still find traces of him lying around. Also, why on Earth would anyone go into the cargo hold? I would think carrying a T.rex means stay the f**k away from that general area.

Who knows, but its safe to assume something drew the Rex in there. Visions based on moment maybe someone panicked and tried to run into the cargo hold to hide.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 02:10:42 PM
And thus it creates a plot-hole, ergo a sin.

Then whack a sin on JP for the gallimimus and visitors centre scenes. ;) No impact tremors there either.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 03:39:29 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 03:22:06 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 03:13:45 PM
I blame bad editing, but I see it now that you've pointed it out.

If you can see it how is that bad editing?

I see it in the sense that, "Oh, I see what you mean". You've explained it to me but the film still doesn't show it happening. There should have been a scene showing the line connecting to the noose before buddy on the left side of the truck removed it.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 03:22:06 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 01:14:11 PM
If I go with your explanation, then I have to assume Malcolm's a psychic who read Sarah's mind and was able to deduce a Rex attack was coming at that precise moment. That's beyond ludicrous.

Or he heard her say they're very smart when it comes to protecting their young and deduces that bad things will happen moments before they actually do. No more ludicrous than him swanning about a theme park saying its going to hell 24 hours before it does.

No, his reaction very clearly shows that he can see something coming. He anticipated an attack waaaaaaay back when the baby was first brought in, but in that moment after they release it, he sees them coming just before it happens.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 03:22:06 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 01:14:11 PM
So a T.Rex that's secure in the cargo hold either killed the BRIDGE CREW by hyper-extending its body a la Mr. Fantastic or broke free, killed everyone, then went back to hunker in its bunker. Right.

My god dude, watch the movie the rex didn't start in the cargo hold. The broken restraints are seen on deck. It woke up during the trip because Roland didn't administer the correct dosage of tranquilliser.

Then how the heck did it wind up back in the cargo hold with the doors closed? Did the controller somehow resurrect himself after being eaten only to die after closing the doors? Far as we can tell, there's no other way to get out of the cargo hold without the doors opening up. Yes I know the Rex bursts through them at the end but that's only after a guard picks up the controller and releases them. Jeremy also mentioned in his film the lack of broken doors and windows. How the heck was the Rex able to kill the bridge crew without causing any kind of physical damage?

Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 03:22:06 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 01:14:11 PM
There would've been a sign of something. The Rex ate Gennaro but Muldoon and Ellie still find traces of him lying around. Also, why on Earth would anyone go into the cargo hold? I would think carrying a T.rex means stay the f**k away from that general area.

Who knows, but its safe to assume something drew the Rex in there. Visions based on moment maybe someone panicked and tried to run into the cargo hold to hide.

There's still the issue of how and who closed the cargo bay doors.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 03:22:06 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 02:10:42 PM
And thus it creates a plot-hole, ergo a sin.

Then whack a sin on JP for the gallimimus and visitors centre scenes. ;) No impact tremors there either.

Well, yeah. You're not wrong.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 04:35:10 PM
Dude you see the line detach from the noose to the centre winch of the Humvee when the InGen worker puts it over the animals neck. It right there!

Malcolm is not looking out of the window at the approaching T-Rex. The film would make a point of it if he were. It's a line delivered like that for dramatic effect. This is literally a "sin" pulled from thin air.

If you can't work out that the hand holding onto the cargo bay door controller belong to a guy who obviously closed the doors before biting the dust I can't help you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 05:56:43 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 04:35:10 PM
Malcolm is not looking out of the window at the approaching T-Rex. The film would make a point of it if he were. It's a line delivered like that for dramatic effect. This is literally a "sin" pulled from thin air.

Why would they? It's less dramatic if you see it charging. It's more intense to envision it in your head.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 04:35:10 PM
If you can't work out that the hand holding onto the cargo bay door controller belong to a guy who obviously closed the doors before biting the dust I can't help you.

You claim the T.rex killed the ship crew. It did so by breaking free of its restraints. What doesn't make sense is how it managed to kill people in enclosed spaces without causing physical damage to the ship. This applies to the door operator. Are you really going to suggest that he was somehow able to close the doors after Rex killed him?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 03, 2015, 06:50:12 PM
Perhaps he was only mortally wounded somehow. We don't know what actually happened.

Very interesting about the Elephant thing. Didn't know that at all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 03, 2015, 07:15:08 PM
Quote from: szkoki on Jun 03, 2015, 03:02:51 PM
october 10th, 20:30pm is the time. i bought the tickets before premiere, too bad the movie will be dubbed


is it true that the first screening in the USA is only on 13th of june?
The first screening? No. Alien3 got a special June 9 screening. Aside from that, anybody that buys them early can attend screenings on June 11 at 7 and 10 pm.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 07:34:49 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 05:56:43 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 04:35:10 PM
Malcolm is not looking out of the window at the approaching T-Rex. The film would make a point of it if he were. It's a line delivered like that for dramatic effect. This is literally a "sin" pulled from thin air.

Why would they? It's less dramatic if you see it charging. It's more intense to envision it in your head.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 03, 2015, 04:35:10 PM
If you can't work out that the hand holding onto the cargo bay door controller belong to a guy who obviously closed the doors before biting the dust I can't help you.

You claim the T.rex killed the ship crew. It did so by breaking free of its restraints. What doesn't make sense is how it managed to kill people in enclosed spaces without causing physical damage to the ship. This applies to the door operator. Are you really going to suggest that he was somehow able to close the doors after Rex killed him?

Haha good god, Malcolm is in no way looking at the Rexes charging. How is this even a thing?! It's like claiming the alien says "bacon balls" when popping out of John Hurt's chest. Its just not happening on screen.

The hand on the wheel is a bit confusing. But the guys hand holding onto the cargo bay door controls is out on deck. So the guy got injured and closed te doors behind the Rex before dying, as mentioned before.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jun 03, 2015, 08:02:05 PM
Any reviews for JW yet?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 03, 2015, 08:35:42 PM
Nope. I don't think we'll see any before Wednesday.

http://www.scified.com/site/jurassicworld/chronicle-collectibles-releasing-jurassic-park-t-rex-statue

QuoteWhat's cooler then a new Jurassic Park movie? Why, a new Jurassic Park collectible! This past weekend, at WonderFest 2015, Chronicle Collectibles  revealed a slew of upcoming products - one of which was the unpainted prototype for an upcoming Jurassic Park T-Rex statue!

Read more: http://www.scified.com/site/jurassicworld/chronicle-collectibles-releasing-jurassic-park-t-rex-statue#ixzz3c2SyzZ5b
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 03, 2015, 11:42:18 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CGnMtTfU8AAR81E.jpg:large)

Dave O'F
‏@DaveOFlanagan

The Park is open in 8 days - my #JAWS #JURASSICWORLD mashup @EricVespe @DrewAtHitFix @firstshowing @jurassicparkiv
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 04, 2015, 02:26:59 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Jun 03, 2015, 11:42:18 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CGnMtTfU8AAR81E.jpg:large)

Dave O'F
‏@DaveOFlanagan

The Park is open in 8 days - my #JAWS #JURASSICWORLD mashup @EricVespe @DrewAtHitFix @firstshowing @jurassicparkiv

Unf
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Jun 04, 2015, 04:22:37 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rl8tWsv1Y88

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CrOU0x7KQmo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ic6JgowZzPU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoehmrHKHfI
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 04, 2015, 10:31:45 AM
lol why is so blind about lost world? the review someone added before here is way more detailed and stands with two feet on the ground
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 04, 2015, 12:10:17 PM
Quote from: szkoki on Jun 04, 2015, 10:31:45 AM
lol why is so blind about lost world? the review someone added before here is way more detailed and stands with two feet on the ground

Because it's great save for a couple dumb scenes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 04, 2015, 12:13:27 PM
The Retrospective TLW review was quite good. He summed it up perfectly: a film that has a few good scenes but overall doesn't work as well as it should have.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 04, 2015, 12:34:04 PM
TLW has a pair of weird scenes but overall works wonders.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 04, 2015, 01:07:35 PM
TLW is so awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 04, 2015, 01:18:42 PM
I liked the lost world but I agree with Oliver, the movie's ideas didn't rouse me to the theater to see it. A lot of my friends thought the San Diego rampage was a terrible idea but I honestly loved it. On the other hand the black girl doing the gymnastics by itself is enough to kill the film. The silly things like hanging on a rope as the truck fell or how the t-rex ate everyone to pieces on the boat, muffin button.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 04, 2015, 01:36:15 PM
The gymnastics scene wouldn't have been as bad if the raptor wasn't so easily distracted. Seriously; the thing just stands there at gawks at her for a good four seconds without even flinching.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 04, 2015, 01:43:04 PM
I can think of a few excuses but It should have just been cut out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 04, 2015, 01:57:26 PM
On that I certainly agree. Short scene though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 04, 2015, 01:58:08 PM
Retrospective brought up a great point that I never considered which was, why bring back Ian Malcolm? If the intention of the excursion is to study dinosaurs, wouldn't you want Alan Grant?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Keg on Jun 04, 2015, 04:48:05 PM
Don't care about the reasons why or if theyre even logical, i'll take Ian Malcolm in JP over Alan Grant any day. For me it kind of makes up for how little Goldblum got to do in the first film. I love The Lost World, I really do but that massive plot hole of how the f**k everybody on board the ship dies still irritates me everytime I watch it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 04, 2015, 04:53:05 PM
Malcolm > Grant.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 04, 2015, 04:53:47 PM
The best thing about TLW were the toys it spawned.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 04, 2015, 04:55:09 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpR5ZyKyqYc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOwc4PHbt8w
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 04, 2015, 05:13:26 PM
So basically most carnivores had feathers and most herbivores were scaly, if true. On Facebook they put "You win this round, Spielberg." Lol but I guess he'd be only half right.

http://www.iflscience.com/plants-and-animals/most-dinosaurs-were-probably-scaly-not-feathered
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: p1nk81cd on Jun 04, 2015, 05:42:26 PM
Can't wait for this one, looking forward to seeing Rexie again. ^.^
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 04, 2015, 06:00:06 PM
Keeping up with the memorabilia is going to be a pain in the ass. I'm also going to have to put collecting other stuff on hold for the next couple of months I think.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BT5W4zllhCo
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 04, 2015, 09:20:25 PM
Sin 18: "Sexy archaeology."

...annnnd thats why I don't watch Cinema Sins. ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: jacc.90 on Jun 04, 2015, 11:02:53 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 04, 2015, 09:20:25 PM
Sin 18:"Sexy archaeology."

...annnnd thats why I don't watch Cinema Sins. ::)

> "Sexy archaeology."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iea5Bw1ys1Q
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 04, 2015, 11:08:02 PM
"This movie makes me miss Stan Winston" -- with a little more research he definitely wouldn't say that. Still love CinemaSins but yeah sometimes they don't research too much and just go for the cool comment or punchline.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Jun 04, 2015, 11:23:55 PM
CinemaSins?

I really hate that channel.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FQYOA_ciyS6c%2Fhqdefault.jpg&hash=4de1e95821f35daf9226a838ab3cebf3c9e65d6c)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 04, 2015, 11:30:00 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 04, 2015, 11:08:02 PM
"This movie makes me miss Stan Winston" -- with a little more research he definitely wouldn't say that. Still love CinemaSins but yeah sometimes they don't research too much and just go for the cool comment or punchline.

He said that? f**king moron  :laugh:

Quote from: MrSpaceJockey on Jun 04, 2015, 11:23:55 PM
CinemaSins?

I really hate that channel.

http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QYOA_ciyS6c/hqdefault.jpg

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 04, 2015, 11:34:27 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 04, 2015, 11:08:02 PM
"This movie makes me miss Stan Winston" -- with a little more research he definitely wouldn't say that. Still love CinemaSins but yeah sometimes they don't research too much and just go for the cool comment or punchline.
Maybe they meant that they missed him because the dinosaurs looked good in Jurassic Park III?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 04, 2015, 11:42:32 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic2.businessinsider.com%2Fimage%2F556f5b8deab8ead11d7a7612-1200-800%2Frich%2520kelly%2520%28poster%29_revised.jpg&hash=0dad2a087524bf3335474e3afb1aea121931b1b9)


Germain Lussier
‏@GermainLussier

Um, holy shit @TheRichKelly, this @MondoNews Jurassic Park poster is SO GOOD. http://www.businessinsider.com/jurassic-park-mondo-posters-2015-6 ...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 04, 2015, 11:57:10 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jun 04, 2015, 11:34:27 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 04, 2015, 11:08:02 PM
"This movie makes me miss Stan Winston" -- with a little more research he definitely wouldn't say that. Still love CinemaSins but yeah sometimes they don't research too much and just go for the cool comment or punchline.
Maybe they meant that they missed him because the dinosaurs looked good in Jurassic Park III?
Said over a CGI dino -- doubt it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dachande on Jun 04, 2015, 11:59:46 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 04, 2015, 11:08:02 PM
"This movie makes me miss Stan Winston" -- with a little more research he definitely wouldn't say that. Still love CinemaSins but yeah sometimes they don't research too much and just go for the cool comment or punchline.

Well they've said themselves that a lot of the time they enjoy the films, and they just make the nitpicky bits for fun. Anybody that thinks that these things are completely serious is slightly delusional.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 05, 2015, 12:11:30 AM
I know that very well, Dacha -- I love CinemaSins as I said, but that comment is complete bonks very simply. It's not even a nitpick. It's just wrong. And I say that as someone that regularly checks out their new videos.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Wrecktangle on Jun 05, 2015, 12:12:38 AM
CinemaSins is fun. Scene not containing lap dance should always be a legitimate sin. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dachande on Jun 05, 2015, 12:13:53 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 05, 2015, 12:11:30 AM
I know that very well, Dacha -- I love CinemaSins as I said, but that comment is complete bonks very simply. It's not even a nitpick. It's just wrong. And I say that as someone that regularly checks out their new videos.

Yeah i know. :P

Although this comment from them on their reddit kinda sums it up

QuoteWhat if I told you... sometimes we just f*ck things up, and sometimes we write what Chris calls "intentionally ignorant" sins?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 05, 2015, 12:15:43 AM
Never go on Reddit, only for the AMAs :P

but still it's pretty bizarre. There's a big ass Spinosaurus animatronic, built by Stan Winston Studio, for like half of the film. easy to miss I guess.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jun 05, 2015, 02:32:10 AM
f**k cinema sins.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 05, 2015, 02:41:57 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sqWKeadeX4
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 05, 2015, 03:48:01 AM
Quote from: Dachande on Jun 04, 2015, 11:59:46 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 04, 2015, 11:08:02 PM
"This movie makes me miss Stan Winston" -- with a little more research he definitely wouldn't say that. Still love CinemaSins but yeah sometimes they don't research too much and just go for the cool comment or punchline.

Well they've said themselves that a lot of the time they enjoy the films, and they just make the nitpicky bits for fun. Anybody that thinks that these things are completely serious is slightly delusional.

I understand that. Still doesn't change the fact that most people will use all that as ammo to bash the movie. And like I said, potentially ruins some great scenes by drawing focus to some mistake in the background that would've otherwise gone unnoticed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 05, 2015, 10:23:14 AM
First Impressions From Jurassic World Press Screenings in LA
http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=315


Quote from: ace3g on Jun 05, 2015, 02:41:57 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sqWKeadeX4


this is a better version of that trailer, more intense and creepy. i think this is the best one so far

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ns898PKrvmg
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jun 05, 2015, 11:13:58 AM
Love how all those negative reactions are from the one fella.

Cautiously optimistic about this. Rewatched JP1 and 2 last night. Still prefer 1.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 05, 2015, 11:48:46 AM
Lmfao Curtis the social justice warrior
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 05, 2015, 12:02:08 PM
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLkzgy-ovcdS3qek5vM4xRh21m6j0NkFRn

Watch this. It's the Lost World RV Restoration Project. As for the CinemaSins video, here are my thoughts:
1:00 Pterosaurs AREN'T dinosaurs. Yeesh. Can people please f**king research this already?!

3:28 yes, it SOUNDS bigger. Usually the tone and volume of the noise can give that away, the same way a deeper voice can tell you if one human is older than another.

4:10 holy shit, no sin just for the T.Rex dying? I am disappoint, Jeremy.

10:11 see my first critique.

10:55 AGAIN

11:46 was that sarcasm? I hope so.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alienseseses on Jun 05, 2015, 07:27:21 PM
Quote from: szkoki on Jun 05, 2015, 10:23:14 AM
First Impressions From Jurassic World Press Screenings in LA
http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=315


Quote from: ace3g on Jun 05, 2015, 02:41:57 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sqWKeadeX4


this is a better version of that trailer, more intense and creepy. i think this is the best one so far

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ns898PKrvmg
This is instantly my favorite trailer for the movie. Almost wish they'd led with it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Jun 05, 2015, 08:56:20 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 05, 2015, 11:48:46 AM
Lmfao Curtis the social justice warrior
apparently that dude hasnt even see it. People have from jruassic legacy have quizzed him and he couldnt even anwser the questions right then goes aheads and deletes the comments psh typical douche.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jun 05, 2015, 08:57:51 PM
Wow what a total c**t. The worst kind of person.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 05, 2015, 11:01:14 PM
if anyone cares

http://www.ew.com/article/2015/06/05/jurassic-world-scientifically-more-plausible
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 05, 2015, 11:27:55 PM
Quote from: szkoki on Jun 05, 2015, 11:01:14 PM
if anyone cares

http://www.ew.com/article/2015/06/05/jurassic-world-scientifically-more-plausible

inb4 T. rex fanboys shit on Jack Horner for petty reasons.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jun 05, 2015, 11:40:56 PM
One more week until a new World is witnessed.

One more month until I get to witness it (July 4th).

Spoiler
To those unbeknowst, I watch the JP films only on July 4th. This year is going to be special, as getting a new film to the franchise is a very rare event.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 05, 2015, 11:56:15 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FoEEgmz9.jpg&hash=d7529add2c01c66039ad95c9a1e23ed943a79745)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 05, 2015, 11:58:32 PM
Jurassic Park is about to start on NBC with Spielberg and Pratt hosting
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 06, 2015, 09:09:52 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Jun 05, 2015, 11:58:32 PM
Jurassic Park is about to start on NBC with Spielberg and Pratt hosting
Geez louise, pratts hosting absolutely stunk.

Still I wonder what the deal was with the pig... I mean why not just let them eat it?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 06, 2015, 04:08:36 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CG1A6IJUkAAdsMn.jpg:large)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CGya1zWUQAE_dve.png:large)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Jun 06, 2015, 06:06:17 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jun 06, 2015, 09:09:52 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Jun 05, 2015, 11:58:32 PM
Jurassic Park is about to start on NBC with Spielberg and Pratt hosting
Geez louise, pratts hosting absolutely stunk.

Still I wonder what the deal was with the pig... I mean why not just let them eat it?

I liked Pratt's hosting, and that's a surprise since I disliked his involvement in this movie from the very beginning; ah well, here's hoping he pulls a great job in the film. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 06, 2015, 06:44:16 PM
iRex Clip

Spoiler
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivG0kdJAy7k&feature
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 06, 2015, 10:43:52 PM
The dinosaur is pretty slow... guess it got fat in the pen. :P

Quote from: predxeno on Jun 06, 2015, 06:06:17 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jun 06, 2015, 09:09:52 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Jun 05, 2015, 11:58:32 PM
Jurassic Park is about to start on NBC with Spielberg and Pratt hosting
Geez louise, pratts hosting absolutely stunk.

Still I wonder what the deal was with the pig... I mean why not just let them eat it?

I liked Pratt's hosting, and that's a surprise since I disliked his involvement in this movie from the very beginning; ah well, here's hoping he pulls a great job in the film. :)
He was stiff as a brick and reading off of a teleprompter. :P He'll be fine in the movie though, he's great at playing likeable characters.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 06, 2015, 10:53:14 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLBNEMHG_AY
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 07, 2015, 04:09:33 AM
Quote from: Alienseseses on Jun 05, 2015, 07:27:21 PM
Quote from: szkoki on Jun 05, 2015, 10:23:14 AM
First Impressions From Jurassic World Press Screenings in LA
http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=315


Quote from: ace3g on Jun 05, 2015, 02:41:57 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sqWKeadeX4


this is a better version of that trailer, more intense and creepy. i think this is the best one so far

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ns898PKrvmg
This is instantly my favorite trailer for the movie. Almost wish they'd led with it.

Chills!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 07, 2015, 10:17:16 AM
Final trailer (global trailer with extended shots)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RH0Nkj40KxU
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 07, 2015, 10:42:04 AM
so we know whats up with the pig
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: jacc.90 on Jun 07, 2015, 02:28:55 PM
RACORD !!!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivG0kdJAy7k

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kUXnm7egww
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 07, 2015, 04:18:38 PM
i admit it, the first scene are full of clichés
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Jun 07, 2015, 08:54:35 PM
Quote from: szkoki on Jun 07, 2015, 04:18:38 PM
i admit it, the first scene are full of clichés

They are :-/


But im totally excited anyway!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Wrecktangle on Jun 07, 2015, 09:08:29 PM
Kid actors  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 07, 2015, 09:35:44 PM
Judge the scene in the theater.... it's cut for the clip...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 07, 2015, 09:40:50 PM
So is anyone taking bets yet? I bet the iRex is going to talk... I mean with that mouth and tongue he's going to rawr get into ma belly!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gazz on Jun 07, 2015, 11:14:12 PM
These clips look... kinda shitty to be honest.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 08, 2015, 01:52:37 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jun 07, 2015, 09:40:50 PM
So is anyone taking bets yet? I bet the iRex is going to talk... I mean with that mouth and tongue he's going to rawr get into ma belly!
Stop ruining this movie for me
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 08, 2015, 02:05:04 AM
I don't think we will have another "Alan" type scene
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 08, 2015, 04:24:07 AM
Chris Pratt!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2UQv2JUZoU (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2UQv2JUZoU)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Jun 08, 2015, 04:56:33 AM
I'm aware this is a funny little fan theory going around but is there any actual confirmation on this?  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 08, 2015, 06:39:51 AM
Quote from: MrSpaceJockey on Jun 08, 2015, 04:56:33 AM
I'm aware this is a funny little fan theory going around but is there any actual confirmation on this?  :D
May I ask which fan theory you are talking about? :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PVTDukeMorrison on Jun 08, 2015, 06:49:13 AM
That the little fat kid from the first film (vid related) is Chris Pratts character
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 08, 2015, 07:01:30 AM
Oh shit for real... that would be amazing.  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 08, 2015, 07:10:39 AM
That'd be crazy!  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 08, 2015, 08:26:16 AM
He's not :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 08, 2015, 08:48:12 AM
Nah Pratt totally looks like that pudgy kid. Has got to be true. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Jun 08, 2015, 10:42:27 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jun 08, 2015, 06:39:51 AM
Quote from: MrSpaceJockey on Jun 08, 2015, 04:56:33 AM
I'm aware this is a funny little fan theory going around but is there any actual confirmation on this?  :D
May I ask which fan theory you are talking about? :P

If we're really going at it, we can link together Alan Grant's "Try to show a little respect" with Owen Grady's "It's not about control.  It's a relationship based on respect."  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 08, 2015, 11:57:05 AM
I'm wondering. Does anyone else have cosplay lined up? I'm putting on my Dilo hands and mask with a JP shirt, lined with buttons and pins 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jun 08, 2015, 11:57:48 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 08, 2015, 11:57:05 AM
I'm wondering. Does anyone else have cosplay lined up? I'm putting on my Dilo hands and mask with a JP shirt, lined with buttons and pins 8)

Read that as something else. xD

Got any pictures? I'd be curious to see JP cosplay....
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 08, 2015, 12:07:01 PM
Do you remember seeing my profile pic on Facebook with the Raptor mask and puppet from last summer? That, but replace them with what I'm sporting in my current pic.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Scree on Jun 08, 2015, 12:08:10 PM
Finally a good trailer.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0dbJj6x0eU
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rankles75 on Jun 08, 2015, 12:15:10 PM
That's 5 minutes of my life I'm not getting back...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 08, 2015, 12:33:01 PM
God creates dinos
God kills dinos
God creates man
Man kills god
Man creates Cookie Monster
Man creates dinos
Dinos eat man
Muppets inherit the Earth?
What the...

:P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 08, 2015, 12:35:35 PM
Woman animates Muppets?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jun 08, 2015, 01:13:19 PM
Just ordered my tickets for Thursday!!!!!!!!

And then remembered I was supposed to be going out Thursday. xD
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: jacc.90 on Jun 08, 2015, 08:00:05 PM
HE DID IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfnb6WaAe14

GIACCHINO DID IT !!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NY9sEDTFe5g

WWWWWWOOOOOOOOOOOOHHH !!!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Foi59.tinypic.com%2Fnp3ywm.jpg&hash=576ceccece7837328238edecd2b6acdcbcc5730b)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 08, 2015, 09:34:54 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFRkvanD2ao
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 08, 2015, 09:43:06 PM
Wow, Horner sure has changed over the years.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 08, 2015, 09:49:22 PM
Quote from: jacc.90 on Jun 08, 2015, 08:00:05 PM
HE DID IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfnb6WaAe14

GIACCHINO DID IT !!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NY9sEDTFe5g

WWWWWWOOOOOOOOOOOOHHH !!!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Foi59.tinypic.com%2Fnp3ywm.jpg&hash=576ceccece7837328238edecd2b6acdcbcc5730b)

This sounds familiar. I'm not talking about comparing both tracks but I remember a conversation about a game's soundtrack or something other.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 09, 2015, 12:11:17 AM
can not wait until wednesday
(https://scontent-fra3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xta1/v/t1.0-9/10409682_10153347051518117_4866416840729520998_n.jpg?oh=5c8b8528927a83a21485b3c99612767d&oe=55F70E51)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 09, 2015, 01:06:39 PM
It's premier day!

Seeing it tonight. Can't wait!

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CHBOgQaUcAAVgjQ.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jun 09, 2015, 02:31:08 PM
I'm not jealous. At all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 09, 2015, 08:06:41 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvr1xiEaICU

2 Jurassic 2 Furious
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 09, 2015, 09:24:05 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 09, 2015, 01:06:39 PM
It's premier day!

Seeing it tonight. Can't wait!

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CHBOgQaUcAAVgjQ.jpg)

:o :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Wrecktangle on Jun 10, 2015, 01:58:54 AM
Any reviews yet?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 10, 2015, 02:27:38 AM
Short interview with Colin Trevorrow.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6-4DHfydu6w

And Bryce Howard

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4fOFE-K_m-s
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 10, 2015, 10:55:12 AM
This film is on another level!

It's the JP for a new generation for sure!

Loved every minute.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jun 10, 2015, 11:00:39 AM
One question - any reused dialogue?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 10, 2015, 11:34:17 AM
This movie's gonna be awesome isn't it?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 10, 2015, 12:13:19 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 10, 2015, 10:55:12 AM
This film is on another level!

It's the JP for a new generation for sure!

Loved every minute.

Just what I wanted to hear! Can't wait ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 10, 2015, 12:15:51 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 10, 2015, 10:55:12 AM
This film is on another level!

It's the JP for a new generation for sure!

Loved every minute.
Check your PMs man.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gazz on Jun 10, 2015, 12:24:57 PM
45 minutes until the embargo is up!

I've read a couple of interviews with Trevorrow that have managed to excite me more than any of the footage has. Hoping for the best!

Solid reviews coming in.

Den of Geek: 4/5
Empire: 4/5
Comingsoon.net: 9/10
Guardian: 4/5
Telegraph: 4/5
Hollywood Reporter: Mixed Positive
IGN: 8.3/10
Moviebob: Mixed Positive (I think)
Total Film: 4/5
BirthDeathMovies (Devin Faraci): Negative.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 10, 2015, 01:13:47 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKeZ_AYIiXM
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gazz on Jun 10, 2015, 02:23:16 PM
Reviews have evened out somewhat. Looking more like what I initially expected.

67% on Rotten Tomatoes so far.

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/jurassic_world/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rankles75 on Jun 10, 2015, 02:31:15 PM
Looks like pretty much what most of us expected. Better than 2 and 3 but not as good as the original (which it was never going to be). Most of the criticism seems to be that the characters are under-developed, which again was always likely to be the case, but it certainly looks quite encouraging overall...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jun 10, 2015, 02:36:52 PM
Must.Avoid.Reviews.

Although I still want to know if they reuse dialogue. Has anyone seen note of that in any reviews?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rankles75 on Jun 10, 2015, 02:45:00 PM
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Jun 10, 2015, 02:36:52 PM
Must.Avoid.Reviews.

Although I still want to know if they reuse dialogue. Has anyone seen note of that in any reviews?

Doesn't sound like it, from the reviews I've seen so far. Hopefully not, as that's one of my main gear-grinders when it comes to sequels...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jun 10, 2015, 02:48:18 PM
Quote from: Rankles75 on Jun 10, 2015, 02:45:00 PM
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Jun 10, 2015, 02:36:52 PM
Must.Avoid.Reviews.

Although I still want to know if they reuse dialogue. Has anyone seen note of that in any reviews?

Doesn't sound like it, from the reviews I've seen so far. Hopefully not, as that's one of my main gear-grinders when it comes to sequels...

Me too. That's why I ask.  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 10, 2015, 02:49:57 PM
Quote from: Gazz on Jun 10, 2015, 02:23:16 PM
Reviews have evened out somewhat. Looking more like what I initially expected.

67% on Rotten Tomatoes so far.

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/jurassic_world/

That's considerably lower than I expected. I thought at least somewhere in the 80s range :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 10, 2015, 03:16:01 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 10, 2015, 02:49:57 PM
Quote from: Gazz on Jun 10, 2015, 02:23:16 PM
Reviews have evened out somewhat. Looking more like what I initially expected.

67% on Rotten Tomatoes so far.

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/jurassic_world/

That's considerably lower than I expected. I thought at least somewhere in the 80s range :-\

It's been getting 8 and 9's in a lot of other sites and magazines yet it's low on Rotten Tomatoes. Seems odd to me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rankles75 on Jun 10, 2015, 03:23:00 PM
Have to say it's scored well in most of the reviews I've seen, so the RT score is a bit of a head-scratcher. Didn't expect it to rate much higher than 75% though tbh, simply because it's nigh on impossible to recreate the wow factor the original had and character development was always going to take a back seat with so many set-pieces being crammed in.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 10, 2015, 03:23:35 PM
I'll make up my own mind when I see the film of course but for my own selfish reasons, I want the rating to be higher :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Twin Drive Sigma Aquarion on Jun 10, 2015, 03:46:44 PM
OR! OR! OR! OR!........ Rotten Tomatoes should never be taken seriously and you should enjoy a movie for yourself. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Jun 10, 2015, 03:47:01 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mRWedgSZs0
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Twin Drive Sigma Aquarion on Jun 10, 2015, 03:52:37 PM
The first three movies were monster movies so that statement is not only off, but confirms I will likely give this a perfect score.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 10, 2015, 04:08:09 PM
Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 10, 2015, 03:47:01 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mRWedgSZs0

Watch Later! But I do love Jahns...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: hfeldhaus on Jun 10, 2015, 04:09:28 PM
Quote from: Twin Drive Sigma Aquarion on Jun 10, 2015, 03:52:37 PM
The first three movies were monster movies so that statement is not only off, but confirms I will likely give this a perfect score.

The first wasn't really a monster movie. It had elements but was more of an adventure. The Lost World is where the dinosaurs became monster and that's where the series went to shit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 10, 2015, 04:23:14 PM
Think they really became monsters by the third one to be honest. Second one had a rampaging rex, yes, but rampaging animals aren't necessarily monsters. Thing was drugged as shit.

Stalker Spinosaurus, on the other hand...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rankles75 on Jun 10, 2015, 04:32:27 PM
Apart from the character development, the other main criticism I've seen thrown at JW is "sexism". But seeing as how just about every film these days is accused of that, I don't really give a rat's arse...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 10, 2015, 04:35:58 PM
Everything is sexist racist classist etc nowadays. Get used to it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Twin Drive Sigma Aquarion on Jun 10, 2015, 05:21:54 PM
Quotethat's where the series went to shit.
All three movies are awesome. Plus the first movie was a monster movie, just a rare breed and a high budget, much like how Alien is a 50s monster movie with good cinematography and effects. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Jun 10, 2015, 05:29:01 PM
70 percent on rotten tomatoes now. chris stuckman and the schmoes gave it a good review, dissapointed in jeremys review.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: hfeldhaus on Jun 10, 2015, 05:53:00 PM
Quote from: Twin Drive Sigma Aquarion on Jun 10, 2015, 05:21:54 PM
Quotethat's where the series went to shit.
All three movies are awesome. Plus the first movie was a monster movie, just a rare breed and a high budget, much like how Alien is a 50s monster movie with good cinematography and effects. 8)

The first really wasn't a monster movie. It's clear intention was adventure. None of the dinosaurs were portrayed as being monster like. The kitchen scene is the only scene I can think of that backs up your theory.

Lost World turned into a monster movie towards the end where it ends up being a Godzilla film. Still enjoyable though, the third film however was a steaming pile of steg shit. (personal opinion ofcourse)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 10, 2015, 06:02:23 PM
Up to 74%

I should ask, but I'm guessing the answer is a no: is there a post-credits scene?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Twin Drive Sigma Aquarion on Jun 10, 2015, 06:03:23 PM
QuoteNone of the dinosaurs were portrayed as being monster like. The kitchen scene is the only scene I can think of that backs up your theory.
And the T-Rex attacks weren't? Hell the gallimimus hunt scene was a homage to The Valley of Gwangi.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Valley_of_Gwangi#Legacy

http://www.nealromanek.com/tag/books/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 10, 2015, 06:07:10 PM
Quote from: hfeldhaus on Jun 10, 2015, 05:53:00 PM
Lost World turned into a monster movie towards the end where it ends up being a Godzilla film.

However they justify the Tyrannosaur's actions by saying as soon as its quenched its thirst its going to hunt, and being in an alien environment the Rex doesn't quite know what to do until it hears the cries of its infant.

If you've ever seen videos of elephants rampaging they could be mistaken to act like monsters.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: hfeldhaus on Jun 10, 2015, 06:32:09 PM
Quote from: Twin Drive Sigma Aquarion on Jun 10, 2015, 06:03:23 PM
QuoteNone of the dinosaurs were portrayed as being monster like. The kitchen scene is the only scene I can think of that backs up your theory.
And the T-Rex attacks weren't? Hell the gallimimus hunt scene was a homage to The Valley of Gwangi.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Valley_of_Gwangi#Legacy

http://www.nealromanek.com/tag/books/

Like I said there were elements but it was never a flat out monster movie like you stated.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 10, 2015, 06:36:35 PM
Quote from: Twin Drive Sigma Aquarion on Jun 10, 2015, 06:03:23 PM
QuoteNone of the dinosaurs were portrayed as being monster like. The kitchen scene is the only scene I can think of that backs up your theory.
And the T-Rex attacks weren't? Hell the gallimimus hunt scene was a homage to The Valley of Gwangi.

I think that's the scene which does the most (among the adult carnivore sequences at least) to convey the dinosaurs as animals rather than monsters. Just doing what they'd do naturally, and in a convincing manner.

It's also the only scene in the series to date in which the dinosaurs actually hunt each other, as far as I can remember. Sadly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: reecebomb on Jun 10, 2015, 06:45:02 PM
Just came back, the film is so stupid and filled with cliches but luckily it is also very entertaining. It's a multi million dollar B-movie basically. 7/10 seems right, better than JP3 for sure, better than Godzilla 2014. Like Alien 3 said, JP for the new generation.
A scene was obviously ripped off from Aliens, i didn't mind.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 10, 2015, 08:52:43 PM
so you saw the movie... two days early...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: reecebomb on Jun 10, 2015, 09:26:42 PM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 10, 2015, 08:52:43 PM
so you saw the movie... two days early...

Yes, in Estonia. Im surprised how much of the critics are praising the movie. Tbh it is really a bad film when i think about it, but much more fun and memorable than JP3.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 10, 2015, 09:30:42 PM
I know not many people liked Stuckman but he liked it enough.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=J7qB07zvjfI
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 10, 2015, 09:39:56 PM
who approved this really? ???

worst, dumbest, ugliest JP ever...yet it made me cry(yes the old score and one dino's death, than the movie decided to screw you viewer u'll get a dumb action movie, with packing everything in every scene we got)

4-5/10

exactly and i think its worse than TLW and JP3

Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 10, 2015, 03:47:01 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mRWedgSZs0


Don't you see the danger, John Trevor, inherent in what you're doing here? Genetic power JP is the most awesome force the planet's ever seen, but you wield it like a kid that's found his dad's gun.


But honestly can u see the irony in the story? Sicentist (here Trevor and Spielberg) make a genetically modifed monster(wich here is Jurassic World) to please the endless hunger of the audiance. What did the character get, what did we get? Exactly.


pros
Spoiler

- sets
- original score, music in general
- Pratt
- best moment is that Apatosaurus death
- Dr Wu explains it finally why all the dinos are different in JW/JP than they were in reality(feather etc) *
[close]

contras
Spoiler

oh boy...
- cgi isnt that good besides the I-Rex
- movie's pace is off, its like ACTION, peace+dinos, ACTION, talking about the boring plot what an 8yrs old made, ACTION,talking about the boring plot what an 8yrs old made ACTION ...ew
- cartoon characters indeed, so cartoons that you wont care about them, how could this Masrani stay alive in this world for 30-40yrs?
- there are some side kick characters with too much screen time, and they are more even non relevant!
- the dino galore...this movie is like a kid's idea who throws his dinos together to beat eachothers up just because
- okay the tamed raptors. it is explained, i wasnt even against it. but the raptors ran into the I-rex...and since the I-rex has raptor genes it can talk to them and turn them against humans...i mean WTF??...but okay, lets assume its okay but no one in the lab expected this yet their plan was all along to use raptors as weapons and this would be their biggest test, yet Wu didnt warned his fellow ingen members about this?...but no dont settle down, the movie goes even further, since the raptors in the end for some reason turn on the I-rex just because...??? and in the end they can talk to the T-rex too ???
- that Wu explanation caused this, allowed to movie  to make these animals officially MONSTERS, and it goes even further with the old talking T-rex in it, it made JP animals also MONSTERS*


F*CK U MOVIE


- Masrani's death is so irrelevant yet they tried to make it serious
- that babysitters death is so irrelevant yet they tried to make it serious
- the T-Rex was waiting all day long at his doorstep to come out?
- really over the top, out of pace jokes, why?
- action scenes are actually really boring
- movie has no suspense besides the I-rex's outbreak
- what the hell happened to Omar SY's character?
..never mind i dont care
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Jun 10, 2015, 10:37:33 PM
cant even understand what youre saying
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rankles75 on Jun 10, 2015, 10:42:29 PM
Reading that made my head hurt... :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 10, 2015, 10:46:09 PM
this movie made my head hurt too, too bad it touched seriously Jurassic Park because it will make your heart bleed too
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Jun 10, 2015, 11:13:06 PM
iv seen other fans praise this movie, so it cant be that bad.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 10, 2015, 11:26:00 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsZDZHLSe4Y
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Jun 11, 2015, 12:18:35 AM
I don't follow Stuckmann's review, he said he generally liked it but it's mainly negative. I'm surprised JJ didnt like it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Jun 11, 2015, 12:53:16 AM
Really looking forward to this, I am a bit surprised at the criticism it's been getting but I'll wait until I see the film myself to decide.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 11, 2015, 12:54:00 AM
Quote from: frenchfries on Jun 10, 2015, 11:13:06 PM
iv seen other fans praise this movie, so it cant be that bad.

THIS!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 11, 2015, 01:22:51 AM
My screening is in two days.

I've been playing catch up with the other films leading up to JW. On Jurassic Park, I said this on Facebook:
QuoteFor the first time in a long time, I watched Jurassic Park alone last night. Holy shit. Between Richard Attenborough's death last year and all the hype leading up to this Friday, I was overwhelmed with emotions. This movie is pure magic.

On TLW, I said:
QuoteThe Lost World: Jurassic Park is definitely not as fun as I remember it. The film has some good moments but let's not kid ourselves. It's a *considerably* inferior film to Jurassic Park. It feels just like Iron Man 2. It's not a bad film, but if hadn't been made, no one would have missed it in hindsight.

I'll be watching JP 3 tomorrow.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Jun 11, 2015, 03:12:14 AM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 11, 2015, 12:53:16 AM
Really looking forward to this, I am a bit surprised at the criticism it's been getting but I'll wait until I see the film myself to decide.


Why? never expected this to do particularly well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Jun 11, 2015, 03:14:36 AM
Quote from: reecebomb on Jun 10, 2015, 09:26:42 PM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 10, 2015, 08:52:43 PM
so you saw the movie... two days early...

Yes, in Estonia. Im surprised how much of the critics are praising the movie. Tbh it is really a bad film when i think about it, but much more fun and memorable than JP3.

I think a popcorn B-movie (like Terminator: Genisys) was the best we could have ever hoped for this film; I still am optimistic I'll still have fun watching it though, I ended up enjoying Jurassic Park 3 and even AVPR so how bad can it be?  I just hope Chris Pratt doesn't make too many stupid jokes in the movie, I never liked the wise guy in any action move.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on Jun 11, 2015, 03:23:43 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Jun 11, 2015, 03:14:36 AM
Quote from: reecebomb on Jun 10, 2015, 09:26:42 PM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 10, 2015, 08:52:43 PM
so you saw the movie... two days early...

Yes, in Estonia. Im surprised how much of the critics are praising the movie. Tbh it is really a bad film when i think about it, but much more fun and memorable than JP3.

I think a popcorn B-movie (like Terminator: Genisys) was the best we could have ever hoped for this film; I still am optimistic I'll still have fun watching it though, I ended up enjoying Jurassic Park 3 and even AVPR so how bad can it be?  I just hope Chris Pratt doesn't make too many stupid jokes in the movie, I never liked the wise guy in any action move.

Pratt is actually a more serieus character. In the marketing he is sold as pratt. But he is the more serious one. Masrani is more of a comic relief. But then again They are cartoon characters
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Jun 11, 2015, 03:24:26 AM
^That sounds more promising.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Invader on Jun 11, 2015, 06:05:08 AM
Man this movie was awesome, one of the best movies in recent years imo. 10/10
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 11, 2015, 07:40:42 AM
This isnt a Jurassic Park movie. Expect a really terrible movie then you wont feel betrayed. Altough i havent expected more than the last two films yet it still dissapointed big time.

To be honest yeah its far behind Prometheus ...and its on the same level with AVPR if i had to place it in the Alien universe in terms of quality.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jun 11, 2015, 07:53:55 AM
Seeing it tonight. Really looking forward to it. Haven't read any of the reviews yet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jun 11, 2015, 08:01:26 AM
While I'm still not massively enthused by this film (even after watching The Lost World on TV at the weekend - love that movie) I may well catch it some time this weekend.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Jun 11, 2015, 09:18:27 AM
about to go see it. i refuse to be disappoint
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Wrecktangle on Jun 11, 2015, 10:26:22 AM
Jurassic Park - 93%
The Lost World - 52%
Jurassic Park III - 49%
Jurassic World - 73%

Looking good. Might be a worthy sequel (as many reviews say). Keen to see this tomorrow.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jun 11, 2015, 10:38:57 AM
Quote from: Wrecktangle on Jun 11, 2015, 10:26:22 AM
The Lost World - 52%

Was it disliked that much?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HappyAlien on Jun 11, 2015, 11:03:52 AM
Just saw it, liked it a lot. Liked it more than TLW and JP3 but nothing beats the original. Really liked the two scenes that reminded  me of Aliens and Predator 2. Will do a more in depth review tomorrow have to sleep now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jun 11, 2015, 11:36:04 AM
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Jun 11, 2015, 10:38:57 AMWas it disliked that much?

I don't get the loathing that film sometimes seems to get.

In a way it reminds me of Predator 2 - it's one of those films that seems to get slated more than it trluy deserves simply because it isn't as good as the first, but taken on it's own it's really a very entertaining, well-made film. Some great characters and dialogue in it. I thought taking the most memorable supporting character from the first and putting him front and centre was a great move.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Jarac on Jun 11, 2015, 01:15:00 PM
Going to see it tonight. So excited.
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Jun 11, 2015, 11:36:04 AM
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Jun 11, 2015, 10:38:57 AMWas it disliked that much?

I don't get the loathing that film sometimes seems to get.

In a way it reminds me of Predator 2 - it's one of those films that seems to get slated more than it trluy deserves simply because it isn't as good as the first, but taken on it's own it's really a very entertaining, well-made film. Some great characters and dialogue in it. I thought taking the most memorable supporting character from the first and putting him front and centre was a great move.

Eh... it was a fun romp when I first saw it. The music is great and some of the scenes are breathtaking. But the writing could range from mediocre to downright terrible. One particular moment -on the boat with the severed hand - was just downright laughable. It just went on too long.

So yeah, it's fun every once in a while, but I wouldn't call it good.

And JP3 shouldn't have happened. Definition of a phoned-in cash-grab.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Jun 11, 2015, 01:27:04 PM
That wasn't a Jurassic Park movie. It had the music, the labels. That's it. I'm not even mad at the direction they took the film, it's just that the execution was simply abysmal.

Don't take the film serious. Anyone over 12 can see how terribad it is. But it can be fun. It's an action dinosaur movie which is also basically a comedy because of how bad it is, and it has a hollow cast of characters to fill in the gaps between scenes of dinos. It has the pedigree of Spielberg's masterpiece purely to attract attention to it.

I could go on and on about the bad but I'll just wait for a while. For anyone who's seen it:

Spoiler
Let's get one thing straight. That T Rex was not the OG T rex from Jurassic Park. At all.

Remember this?

(https://33.media.tumblr.com/3423721987a15758eb7c505d93b35060/tumblr_n0qfz2yrRU1rp96zgo1_500.gif)

She's nowhere to be seen. Instead you get Grumpy from land of the lost covered in make up to look like the og t rex.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbasementrejects.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F09%2Fland-of-the-lost-2009-rick-and-grumpy-tyrannosaurus-rex-fred-flintstone-tail-slide-will-ferrell.jpg&hash=2e26d6de68f1ee15e441f7aa54535058a6118c06)

The raptors were more like those things in King Kong then the raptors from a Jurassic Park movie.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg2.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20090507000253%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2F3%2F3c%2FDVDPlay_2009-05-06_16-54-20-72.jpg&hash=8c7f88796851a9601e56b35c1b045675409c9a65)(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fvignette2.wikia.nocookie.net%2Fkingkong%2Fimages%2Fb%2Fb7%2FImage005.jpg%2Frevision%2Flatest%3Fcb%3D20090311011852%26amp%3Bpath-prefix%3Den&hash=751cf7ab4ebc321a5a5aa6245c11d9a67c46e16f)

Literally, towards the end when the dinos had teamed up with the humans to fight the i rex... that is the literal definition of "cringe worthy" lol. When that last raptor, blue, comes running along in slow mo is quite possibly the worst moment I've ever witnessed on the big screen. It's worse than "alan" I mean WTF. Who thought that shxt was a good idea lmfao.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 11, 2015, 04:23:50 PM
Quote from: bloodinthemud on Jun 11, 2015, 01:27:04 PM
That wasn't a Jurassic Park movie. It had the music, the labels. That's it. I'm not even mad at the direction they took the film, it's just that the execution was simply abysmal.

Don't take the film serious. Anyone over 12 can see how terribad it is. But it can be fun. It's an action dinosaur movie which is also basically a comedy because of how bad it is, and it has a hollow cast of characters to fill in the gaps between scenes of dinos. It has the pedigree of Spielberg's masterpiece purely to attract attention to it.

I could go on and on about the bad but I'll just wait for a while. For anyone who's seen it:

Spoiler
Let's get one thing straight. That T Rex was not the OG T rex from Jurassic Park. At all.

Remember this?

(https://33.media.tumblr.com/3423721987a15758eb7c505d93b35060/tumblr_n0qfz2yrRU1rp96zgo1_500.gif)

She's nowhere to be seen. Instead you get Grumpy from land of the lost covered in make up to look like the og t rex.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbasementrejects.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F09%2Fland-of-the-lost-2009-rick-and-grumpy-tyrannosaurus-rex-fred-flintstone-tail-slide-will-ferrell.jpg&hash=2e26d6de68f1ee15e441f7aa54535058a6118c06)

The raptors were more like those things in King Kong then the raptors from a Jurassic Park movie.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg2.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20090507000253%2Fjurassicpark%2Fimages%2F3%2F3c%2FDVDPlay_2009-05-06_16-54-20-72.jpg&hash=8c7f88796851a9601e56b35c1b045675409c9a65)(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fvignette2.wikia.nocookie.net%2Fkingkong%2Fimages%2Fb%2Fb7%2FImage005.jpg%2Frevision%2Flatest%3Fcb%3D20090311011852%26amp%3Bpath-prefix%3Den&hash=751cf7ab4ebc321a5a5aa6245c11d9a67c46e16f)

Literally, towards the end when the dinos had teamed up with the humans to fight the i rex... that is the literal definition of "cringe worthy" lol. When that last raptor, blue, comes running along in slow mo is quite possibly the worst moment I've ever witnessed on the big screen. It's worse than "alan" I mean WTF. Who thought that shxt was a good idea lmfao.
[close]

Shit! I really hope you were exaggerating in your spoiler tag O.o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 11, 2015, 06:44:32 PM
Back from it. Will write a proper review tomorrow. Regardless, if you like JP or anything fanta-Dinosaur related, go see it. By all means do. You won't regret it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Jun 11, 2015, 06:47:10 PM
i'v been seeing some really negative reviews but for the most part its been getting a positive reception.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jun 11, 2015, 06:59:07 PM
I think critics are going to compare to the first film which is why the reviews are mix. Going to see it with a open mind tomorrow.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 11, 2015, 07:03:01 PM
Just got back from seeing it. I think everyone should go into this film free of prejudice, but I'll separate my spoiler-free rating for anyone interested in a purely numerical impression.

Rating (no spoilers)
For me, 3 out of 5.
[close]

Review (mild spoilers)

As a general action film, I think it's very well done. The direction and editing are spot-on, the angles are picked well, the shots imaginative, there's a good sense of perspective within the scene, and nice long shots - no Michael Bay-style cuts-every-2-seconds whirling camerawork that seems to dominate/ruin the genre at the moment. It's still fast-paced and adrenaline-pumping, not Spielberg's slow, frame-perfect, storyboard-heavy style, but it works nicely. The film escalates well too, opening fairly quietly and gradually ramping up the excitement until an OTT monster-tastic finale.
I think Godzilla 2014 might be the film's best comparator, rather than Jurassic Park itself, and I thought it worked better than the kaiju pic.

Script's not so great. It's not a clever film, you really do not get the impression there was any Crichton-level intellect behind it.
Not much Koepp-level humanity either - the characters are generally a mixed bag of total shallowness, irritatingness and implausibility. Chris Pratt makes a likeable Rambo with Han Solo's dating style, and I liked looking at Bryce Dallas Howard, but I didn't think her performance or the writing behind her generated a believable character. The kids (well, the older brother, and the younger kid's hair) are so obnoxious; I get that they needed to add characters to represent the general public to prevent them being faceless cannon fodder, but I really hope the series will shed its Spielbergian need to cram in kids after this instalment.

The effects generally looked pretty good to me, I saw it in IMAX so am not sure if the occasional blurriness or ultra-sharpness around a CG creature can be attributed to the 3D treatment (I wouldn't particularly recommend the 3D, it's not bad but it doesn't enhance the movie to the degree that it did for Titanic and Avatar). There are some close-up CG shots of the dinosaurs which look pretty much flawless, and around halfway through the movie, night falls, and everything looks amazing under cover of darkness.
Then again, the raptors looked like they kept changing size to me, and the dinosaurs generally don't perfectly resemble their forebears in previous JP films.

...And of course, we have the dinosaurs. Probably won't surprise anyone to hear they're a thorough helping of bullshit. Nearly everything is massively larger than in reality, some of them have major anatomical problems, most of them are monotone drab grey/brown, and obviously the Gallimimus, raptors and pterosaurs should be fuzzy. The raptors are described as 75 million years old, cutting across the old Velociraptor giant-size explanation that Crichton had originally written them as Achillobator before the animal's remains were officially named. I've got no idea why they decided to use Pteranodon and Dimorphodon when they could have used terrifying-looking Quetzalcoatlus and real-life-sized Pteranodon as the pterosaurs without needing to inflate them.

Generally, it feels like the film had no palaeontological consult at all. It's a real insult to the original film, which introduced the world to modern dinosaur research. The excuse for not showing dinofuzz on the coelurosaurs was that they wanted to maintain the look of the series' original dinosaurs and give the public what they expect - yet the dinosaurs don't quite match their JP predecessors either. You can see the difference between the Gallimimus in the trailer. If they're going to restyle the dinosaurs anyway, why not make them authentic? Stupid.
The inaccuracies are explained (briefly) in the film, being the results of genetic tampering. It's not a point that's laboured enough to be integral to the plot though, so again, why not have authentic dinosaurs in your dinosaur film?

Aside from the palaeontological realism, the animal behaviour and park security also routinely drop below plausibility. As we've come to expect from a JP movie, animal aggression is generally excessive. Owen's methods of 'relating' to the raptors don't have a lot in common with the way wolf and big cat handlers (the up-close-and-personal types like Shaun Ellis or Craig Busch) deal with their charges, and the finale is a big bundle of behavioural bizarreness, although I'll admit, it's mildly emotionally effecting.

The kids have a petting zoo in which they can ride baby Triceratops and fondle smaller sauropods - these are still fairly large, potentially temperamental animals, interacting with people who're even more unpredictable. Zoos don't let kids play with baby elephants or giraffes, and the reactions of the little dinosaurs didn't feel natural either. Visitors are allowed to get right up close to the dinosaurs with the gyrosphere ride and the canoeing, allegedly protected by an 'invisible fence' technology that repels the animals, but again - would real zoos do this with elephants? The way it's conveyed in the film, if the invisible fence works at all, it's within such a tiny perimeter that sheer momentum would propel the dinosaur into the sphere/kayak before the repelling started to take effect. Just doesn't feel believable.

So, overall. Great action movie, par for the course for a Jurassic Park sequel, terrible dinosaur movie. I'd rank it above JP3, and roughly on the level of The Lost World. Enjoyable, by no means a bad film, but riddled with little (and not so little) problems, and not in the same league as Jurassic Park.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 11, 2015, 09:50:18 PM
how about the fact that this movie ruined the whole purpose of Jurassic Park? and i dont get it that you guys say its horrible and all, yet you recommend it for everyone?


::) this movie is on the level of the new TNMNT
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alienseseses on Jun 11, 2015, 09:53:00 PM
I'm watching Jurassic Park 3 in anticipation of the new one.

I hadn't seen it since I was 7. I'm surprised by how... simple, straightforward it is.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dachande on Jun 11, 2015, 10:09:42 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 10, 2015, 04:35:58 PM
Everything is sexist racist classist etc nowadays. Get used to it.

How can this film possibly be sexist? The overwhelming majority of its cast are female!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TheBATMAN on Jun 11, 2015, 10:32:58 PM
It was a bit meh. certainly not the worst film in the world, but it's just not...interesting. And sadly there isn't a single shot in the whole film where any dinosaur looks real.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Jun 11, 2015, 11:22:55 PM
Quote from: Crazy Shrimp on Jun 11, 2015, 04:23:50 PM
Shit! I really hope you were exaggerating in your spoiler tag O.o

Others may not find it as bad, but for me personally the entire end sequence was horrendously bad. Something out of a saturday morning kids show.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 12, 2015, 12:03:32 AM
Sitting in the theater. Excited as hell! Got perfect seats too  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alienseseses on Jun 12, 2015, 01:31:05 AM
That was the movie 7 year old me wishes he could have made.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Jun 12, 2015, 01:35:21 AM
Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 11, 2015, 03:12:14 AM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 11, 2015, 12:53:16 AM
Really looking forward to this, I am a bit surprised at the criticism it's been getting but I'll wait until I see the film myself to decide.


Why? never expected this to do particularly well.

shut up hubbs thats why
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Wrecktangle on Jun 12, 2015, 02:27:45 AM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 12, 2015, 01:35:21 AM
Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 11, 2015, 03:12:14 AM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 11, 2015, 12:53:16 AM
Really looking forward to this, I am a bit surprised at the criticism it's been getting but I'll wait until I see the film myself to decide.


Why? never expected this to do particularly well.

shut up hubbs thats why

lol finally
Quote from: szkoki on Jun 11, 2015, 09:50:18 PM
how about the fact that this movie ruined the whole purpose of Jurassic Park? and i dont get it that you guys say its horrible and all, yet you recommend it for everyone?


::) this movie is on the level of the new TNMNT

Are you sure this isn't the result of bloated expectations? I find it hard to believe it's THAT bad.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 12, 2015, 02:57:52 AM
Jurassic Park 3 isn't as bad as I remember it, which I'm stunned to say, quite frankly. Is it the weakest of the three (haven't seen JW yet)? Arguably. I'd say it's on par with TLW. JP 3 has some nice moments like the Pteranodon aviary sequence and the chase with the raptors in the jungle isn't bad. The film's problem is a lack of pacing. Everything happens too quickly and too soon.

Yeah, I just rewatched it. Jurassic World in less than 24 hours!!!!!!!!!!!

-----------------------------

On a more serious note, I've never been  had such conflicted anticipation for a film. On one hand, I want to see it more than anything. On the other, I'm very worried. The negative feedback is quite loud.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alienseseses on Jun 12, 2015, 03:35:58 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 12, 2015, 02:57:52 AM
Jurassic Park 3 isn't as bad as I remember it, which I'm stunned to say, quite frankly. Is it the weakest of the three (haven't seen JW yet)? Arguably. I'd say it's on par with TLW. JP 3 has some nice moments like the Pteranodon aviary sequence and the chase with the raptors in the jungle isn't bad. The film's problem is a lack of pacing. Everything happens too quickly and too soon.

Yeah, I just rewatched it. Jurassic World in less than 24 hours!!!!!!!!!!!

-----------------------------

On a more serious note, I've never been  had such conflicted anticipation for a film. On one hand, I want to see it more than anything. On the other, I'm very worried. The negative feedback is quite loud.
Yeah, rewatching JP3 today, I was surprised by how straightforward it is. It wastes no time getting to running from dinosaurs, and it does it dutifully if not creatively. And then it ends.

I imagine if JW came out two years after JP3, it would have been lauded as a rebound.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Razz on Jun 12, 2015, 06:07:45 AM
Seeing this tonight with friends, so can't wait.  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 12, 2015, 06:14:45 AM
So i got out a couple hours ago and I loved it.

The flaws are abundantly clear. And I do think the movie is around that 74% RT has it at. But I was exhilarated and had a lot if fun with it especially with the third act which was superb.

Definitely worth a watch. I'll go more into it tomorrow.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jun 12, 2015, 07:49:58 AM
So I saw it yesterday. Loved it. I'm not a dinosaur buff so all this palaeontologist stuff isn't a bother to me. Even then, the film waves it off with Wu saying that they wouldn't look the same as they do if they didn't have to fill in the gaps in the DNA. It's not Jurassic Park, that's a really important thing to understand. It's not really a remake of the first film. It's a Jurassic Park film (lots of elements from the series) but it's not the first one.

Characters, as stated, were pretty bleh. I loved Pratt and Johnson (but I feel that was probably more because I love them anyway). I did enjoy the way the Raptors and Owen's relationship was handled. It worked really well for me and the whole weaponized story aspect was handled with a very soft touch, I thought. Nothing over the top.

I thought the monster on monster stuff was very fan wanky but again, it worked for me. The I-Rex was believable as genetic crossover has been a thing since the first film. It didn't feel at all out of place.

I really enjoyed it. Plus, no re-used dialogue.  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Jun 12, 2015, 08:15:47 AM
 I especially liked the part where
Spoiler
they turned the t rex into a Pokemon ::)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 12, 2015, 08:19:32 AM
okay so im an ass then  ;D everyone loves this blasphemy
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 12, 2015, 08:36:04 AM
The movie was extremely predictable especially considering the trailers showed way too much. Still screw the flaws; the movie was awesome and gorgeous. Loved the iRex.

Spoiler
better yet the iRex isn't shown being dispatched at the end, it's only assumed
[close]

I honestly thought I was going to hate the characters but I loved them and there wasn't all that much comedy in it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Wrecktangle on Jun 12, 2015, 08:44:31 AM
Was it good as the original? Nope. Was it a damn worthy sequel and a great time? Hell to the yes!

My jaw dropped through the entire third act. I was filled with childhood nostalgia and giddiness!
Spoiler
I-Rex ain't'got shit on the king of the dinosaurs!
[close]

The motorcycle part was lot less dumb than I thought, actually, it was amazing! Lot of respect for the Velociraptors street cred in the movie.

Was anyone else surprised at the brutality of
Spoiler
the way the pterodactyl toyed with the assistant? WOW.
[close]

Bugger JJ, this is a buy on Blu Ray.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jun 12, 2015, 08:50:19 AM
Oh, yeah, I forgot to complain that the story was quite predictable thanks for all the trailers. I didn't see the big finale to the fight coming though- thought that was bad ass.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 12, 2015, 08:54:52 AM
For me JW feels like a hybrid of the first three movies, in tone and style. It brings a lot of new elements and characters to justify it being the fourth chapter and is the perfect way to reboot a franchise which was sleeping for 14 years.

Saw it at the premier and was blown away. Saw it again last night in 2D on a small screen and it again blew me away. The climax was a lot easier to follow in 2D and I seriously cannot wait to own the blu-ray to go through this gem picking up all the little details.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 12, 2015, 09:04:10 AM
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Jun 12, 2015, 08:50:19 AM
Oh, yeah, I forgot to complain that the story was quite predictable thanks for all the trailers. I didn't see the big finale to the fight coming - thought that was bad ass.
Yea it was bad ass...

Spoiler
It was a foregone conclusion that the T-rex was going to wreak the Spinosaurus skeleton. I laughed out  loud at that part. However the poor T-rex got it's ass handed to it... quite literally, by the iRex. Those actual arms gave it too much of an advantage. :P The Mosasaur finale everyone in the theater saw coming from a mile away.
[close]

Quote from: Wrecktangle on Jun 12, 2015, 08:44:31 AM
Spoiler
I-Rex ain't'got shit on the king of the dinosaurs!
[close]

The motorcycle part was lot less dumb than I thought, actually, it was amazing! Lot of respect for the Velociraptors street cred in the movie.

Was anyone else surprised at the brutality of
Spoiler
the way the pterodactyl toyed with the assistant? WOW.
[close]
The motorcycle part wasn't even that significant but yea...
Spoiler
the assistant being tossed around was brutal but I didn't notice if they showed her arm in the Mosasaurs mouth or not. It's obvious she's eaten but I didn't notice it. Damn thing looked awesome in 3D. :P

The T-rex got for the most part destroyed.
[close]

Oh and the terminator genisys trailer looked f**king great in IMAX.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Wrecktangle on Jun 12, 2015, 09:30:17 AM
At least
Spoiler
it was a much better fight than with the Spinosaurus  :laugh: I-Rex really was brutal, especially seeing what it did to the Anklyosaurus... Seeing the Mosasaur drag it down was great, I didn't see it happening myself  :laugh: good for the new additions to get a role.
The 3D was great in this film. Better than in most.
[close]

They've reinvigorated the franchise. Can't wait to see where it goes now. Chris and Bryce were excellent. Hope they come back in future sequels, and maybe a couple of the old favourites?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 12, 2015, 09:59:55 AM
Spoiler
I love that Zara (Claires assistant) was reading Malcolm's book on the monorail near the beginning.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Wrecktangle on Jun 12, 2015, 10:29:36 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 12, 2015, 09:59:55 AM
Spoiler
I love that Zara (Claires assistant) was reading Malcolm's book on the monorail near the beginning.
[close]

I loved
Spoiler
seeing Mr DNA!
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jun 12, 2015, 10:30:23 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 12, 2015, 09:59:55 AM
Spoiler
I love that Zara (Claires assistant) was reading Malcolm's book on the monorail near the beginning.
[close]

Hadn't noticed. Love that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 12, 2015, 11:26:26 AM
http://io9.com/yes-jurassic-parks-bad-dinosaur-science-still-matters-1710655652
Written by the film's consultant, Brian Switek.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/11/opinions/naish-jurassic-world-missed-opportunity/index.html
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Jarac on Jun 12, 2015, 11:50:59 AM
As good as the original? Nope, but honestly didn't expect it to be. That magic is hard to recapture. It had a lot of cheesy moments in it, but screw the haters, the movie was FUN! It felt like a worthy sequel to the original. It even had a lot of references to the original (most subtle that old fans would point out and be like "haaa!"; my friend needs to watch the first movie again, lol). There were also references to Predator and Aliens that it seemed like only I noticed. It was fun and awesome, especially the end!

Overall, it was solid. Did not disappoint.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 12, 2015, 12:04:20 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 12, 2015, 11:26:26 AM
http://io9.com/yes-jurassic-parks-bad-dinosaur-science-still-matters-1710655652
Written by the film's consultant, Brian Switek.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/11/opinions/naish-jurassic-world-missed-opportunity/index.html
Is it just me or do professional paleontologist love Jurassic Park 3 more than Jurassic Park? That's what it sounds like. :P

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 12, 2015, 12:05:20 PM
No. They do like the quilled raptors though. It was a step in the right direction; somewhat.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alienseseses on Jun 12, 2015, 12:38:28 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 12, 2015, 11:26:26 AM
http://io9.com/yes-jurassic-parks-bad-dinosaur-science-still-matters-1710655652
Written by the film's consultant, Brian Switek.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/11/opinions/naish-jurassic-world-missed-opportunity/index.html

They have a line in the movie about that. While explaining that technically every dinosaur in the park is a hybrid, Wu says 'if we made them accurate they would look quite different.'
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 12, 2015, 12:40:35 PM
Switek's article explains why that isn't good enough. It's something, but it's still problematic. Here's a great comment someone left on Facebook in response to this subject; mock dialogue.

QuoteScientist: "Why do the dinosaurs have feathers now? The ones from the original park didn't?"

Dr. Wu: "Hammond had us engineer the originals to be featherless, much like some featherless breeds of chickens, because we actually discovered that they had feathers before fossil specimens of feathered dinosaurs had been discovered. There were concerns regarding the public's reaction to such a shocking change to their image. However, over the last 20 years, many feathered specimens have been discovered, so ironically enough, now featherless dinosaurs would be viewed as inauthentic! Consequently, the CEO of Jurassic World decided it best for us to engineer dinosaurs with their natural feathers."

You can't tell me that would have worked perfectly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rankles75 on Jun 12, 2015, 12:48:33 PM
I can honestly say I don't give a rat's arse whether they have feathers or not. Some people really need to get out more...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 12, 2015, 01:31:36 PM
If you're not actually interested in dinosaurs then that's perfectly understandable.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 12, 2015, 01:43:26 PM
By the way, Vertigo, I read your review on RT.com. Good read. Given my opinion of TLW, I think I'll enjoy this much more.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Jun 12, 2015, 01:49:32 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obpxFVkpnL0
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on Jun 12, 2015, 01:58:54 PM
Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 12, 2015, 01:49:32 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obpxFVkpnL0

BEST alien impression I have ever seen in my entire life :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Jun 12, 2015, 02:36:21 PM
Quote from: Rankles75 on Jun 12, 2015, 12:48:33 PM
I can honestly say I don't give a rat's arse whether they have feathers or not. Some people really need to get out more...

Yeah, f**k people for being passionate about dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rankles75 on Jun 12, 2015, 02:56:04 PM
I've always been a dinosaur fan (who isn't?) and I'm perfectly fine with seeing them on screen the way I've grown up seeing them. Does it really matter that much if the T-Rex has feathers or not? Does it have a major effect on how things turn out? Or would it look just a bit f***ing stupid for it to suddenly have them after three films where it didn't? Do we really want 3ft tall, dumb as a bag of spanners Velociraptors? It's a film series about cloned dinosaurs eating people, a series that has gotten a lot of people interested in palaeontology (despite it's jaw-dropping, glaring inaccuracies  ::)). I will see the film sometime in the next week, and I'm quite sure my enjoyment of it won't be spoiled by a lack of f***ing quills. If there's people out there that can't get over something that trivial, then I honestly pity them...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 12, 2015, 02:57:50 PM
So. Jurassic World.

I have waited long. Everyone reading this probably has. Anybody that knows me knows very well that I have grown up with Jurassic Park and The Lost World: they are incredibly important parts of who I am -- of my very soul. Were it not it for Jurassic Park and The Lost World (as well as other films, mind you), I could be a different person, perhaps. They have radically and viscerally influenced my point of view in things, my interests, my creativity. I owe a lot to them.

That is why the moment I heard John Williams' theme for the first film, in a cinema, I bursted crying as the emotion was simply too much to contain. Jurassic Park was back on the silver screen and even then, even after following the development of this film ever since its announcement, even after booking my ticket on the 'J' seat row of the cinema, I still could not fully believe it until I was there, on that very seat, watching the film.

Of course, after 14 years of waiting, it's only natural that any film would not be able to satisfy all the expectation that have developed over time -- and it's especially true when you are talking about Jurassic Park and yours truly. So yes, the film is not some kind of holy grail nor is it perfect -- but I will tell you this: it has its heart in the right place, and you can feel it, especially if you are a long time enthusiast of this series. References, homages and little winks are everywhere to be seen.
Spoiler
]One of the characters is seen reading a book by Ian Malcolm. There is a John Hammond statue in the new Visitors' Center, and you can hear his voice welcoming the tourists. There is a brief scene where you see Mr. DNA, and another where the hologram of a Dilophosaurus, frill and all, is used to distract one of the Raptors. Zach and Gray visit the old Visitors' center, the bones are still there and all the gadgets are still there. They even fix one of the Jeeps and use it to leave the place. Owen sees the kids' footprints and that is how he knows they have survived the gyrosphere attack. And so on and so forth.
[close]
This is definitely a very nostalgic film.

Structurally, Jurassic World is overall dynamically paced and edited. In other places, it could have been tighter -- a pair or so characters (i.e. Lowery) are kind of useless to the plot and only serve as punchlines. The main characters are however well written and I found them unexpectedly relatable -- especially Mr. Masrani -- and I found myself surprised just at how well Wu is portrayed. He reminds me of some characters personifying death in the old Alfred Hitchcock Presents TV series. Those that have seen it definitely know what I mean. Great writing, and excellent performance from BD Wong (which I remind you is the only original actor from the original film to also appear here). Pratt and Howard own their roles and they really do have a dynamic chemistry to them. Also liked D'Onofrio and his character -- Hoskins -- well enough; not too over the top, thankfully, and unexpectedly
Spoiler
close in philosophy to Ludlow. If you have seen the film, you definitely know what I am getting at.
[close]

Surprisingly enough, besides Williams' rescored theme, I was not overly impressed with Giacchino's original score. I certainly expected more, although undoubtely it does suit the film sharply.

Now to the centerpiece. The dinosaurs. Palaeontological controversies aside, the dinosaurs and the other creatures look absolutely great. I do believe that many of the sequences could have been conveyed with practical animatronics, but the digital effects are top notch. Of course, they do not come without the usual dodgy shots but still -- they avoid sinking in the 'it looks cool therefore it does not have to look real' kind of philosophy that is so common nowadays. Here you can really applaud our great Phil Tippett. The Mosasaurus was absolutely incredible and life-like. I also loved how the Pteranodons dived, which reminded me of seabirds.

Spoiler
Speaking of which, I was surprised at how uncomfortable Zara's death makes you feel. She is picked up and dropped several times by the Pteranodons in the lagoon, only to be scooped up by the Mosasaurus along with one of the flying creatures. You can still see her squirming as the maws of the beast close, although it is a quite frenetic sequence.
[close]

The Raptors' movements are very bird-like. I loved how they were portrayed and anyone in worry for their 'taming' can relax: they are as vicious as they can be. Beautiful designs too -- definitely the classic Raptors, but with their own additions to the original design.

The monstrous Indominus rex has presence and feels very animalistic. It is never really portrayed as a 'monster' until the finale. Its characterization and the way the script revolves around it certainly do flow greatly (especially when Pratt's character discusses its behaviour and most importantly the reasons behind it).

Regarding one of our old acquaintances,
Spoiler
The T.rex did look weird at certain angles. It seems they have stretched the design. Perhaps the intention was to show its age, but there are fan models that 'get' the proportions and angles of the original design far better. Regardless, seeing the Tyrannosaurus roar once again on the big screen was absolutely explosive. The final shot of the film pans around the Tyrannosaurus as it looks around and roars over Isla Nublar and let me say this -- it is gorgeous.
[close]

When it comes to the thunderous climax of the film,
Spoiler
It was definitely a bit overdone -- 'Jurassic Avengers' sprang to mind when the tag team thing happened. This is one of the points where, you know, I just disagree with how the script portrays the characters. The T.rex is summoned, brawls with the villain creature and is overwhelmed -- only to be saved at the last moment by a Velociraptor. Together, they fight the Indominus rex until it is pushed towards the fence of the Mosasaurus lagoon -- where the eponymous creature pulls a Deep Blue Sea and kills the white hybrid. Basically, the script treats the T.rex as a hero, who needs help to fight a bigger threat. You can see this scheme when it comes to a lot of other cinematic heroes. I think it kind of misses the point: these things are animals, not superheroes or anything like that. Animals do not have sudden allies; so in this scene it kind of drops plausibility. I can tell you a number of different endings for the climax, none of which as 'cheesy' as the final result.
[close]


Where to place it? As far as I am concerned I can safely say that this film is above Jurassic Park 3, but still a little below The Lost World (and for other people this might entirely depend on what opinion they have of the second film). I love this movie.

The magic of Jurassic Park is finally back ladies and gentlemen, and I lovingly suggest anyone reading this post to just go, go and see this movie where it should be seen: on a big, gargantuan cinema screen. See it with your partner, your friends, your family, your kids -- or even alone. You will not regret it.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fthedailywh.at%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F06%2F061115prattraptorsbike.gif&hash=3a1e54cbba629ff3cc2ee4c042355fc86490744b)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomorphine on Jun 12, 2015, 03:12:58 PM
Just saw it... Got there five minutes early and paid to see it in 3D, but for some reason, I walked in the (correct) screen and everyone was already watching it - decidedly not in 3D.

Sad panda... I never got to see the original's re-release in 3D and was hoping to with this. Ah, well.

So, verdict!

More or else as entertaining as the original. There are elements here and there which could have been modified, but over all, it's pretty much what 'Lost World' should have been, IMO. It's different, yeah: More believable acting, but not nearly as many iconic philosophical moments which make you think. But the balance makes it feel like it's successfully recaptured the magic.

Loved the climax. Worked well!

As for feathered/furry dinosaurs, well, I'm glad these remained reptilian. I've yet to find a single piece of art where those versions don't look underwhelming, at best (if not ridiculous) and it would have been downright bizarre to see the animals completely changed when we've seen them this way for three entire films.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 12, 2015, 12:40:35 PM
Switek's article explains why that isn't good enough. It's something, but it's still problematic. Here's a great comment someone left on Facebook in response to this subject; mock dialogue.

QuoteScientist: "Why do the dinosaurs have feathers now? The ones from the original park didn't?"

Dr. Wu: "Hammond had us engineer the originals to be featherless, much like some featherless breeds of chickens, because we actually discovered that they had feathers before fossil specimens of feathered dinosaurs had been discovered. There were concerns regarding the public's reaction to such a shocking change to their image. However, over the last 20 years, many feathered specimens have been discovered, so ironically enough, now featherless dinosaurs would be viewed as inauthentic! Consequently, the CEO of Jurassic World decided it best for us to engineer dinosaurs with their natural feathers."

You can't tell me that would have worked perfectly.

There actually is dialogue like that. I won't spoil the context, but he does actually point out that if the DNA had been 'pure' and not deliberately modified, then most of the creatures probably "wouldn't look like" they do in the park.

It's a really simple and effective piece of dialogue which basically covers any concerns, whatsoever, about accuracy in regards to aesthetics or behaviour. For that reason, it's actually better for not specifically referring to fur/feathers. Ambiguity covers all bases.

And, uh... A lot more natural-sounding than that speculative comment above was. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 12, 2015, 03:34:51 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 12, 2015, 02:57:50 PM
The magic of Jurassic Park is finally back ladies and gentlemen, and I lovingly suggest anyone reading this post to just go, go and see this movie where it should be seen: on a big, gargantuan cinema screen. See it with your partner, your friends, your family, your kids -- or even alone. You will not regret it.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fthedailywh.at%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F06%2F061115prattraptorsbike.gif&hash=3a1e54cbba629ff3cc2ee4c042355fc86490744b)

Glad you enjoyed it dude! I'm hoping you'll eventually write up an article around the Indominus. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 12, 2015, 03:35:56 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 12, 2015, 01:43:26 PM
By the way, Vertigo, I read your review on RT.com. Good read. Given my opinion of TLW, I think I'll enjoy this much more.

I put it up on here first a couple of pages ago (Edit: actually three pages ago on p790), but thank you. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 12, 2015, 03:37:40 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 12, 2015, 03:34:51 PM
Glad you enjoyed it dude! I'm hoping you'll eventually write up an article around the Indominus. ;D
That's DEFINITELY on schedule!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 12, 2015, 03:46:07 PM
Quote from: Rankles75 on Jun 12, 2015, 02:56:04 PM
I've always been a dinosaur fan (who isn't?) and I'm perfectly fine with seeing them on screen the way I've grown up seeing them. Does it really matter that much if the T-Rex has feathers or not? Does it have a major effect on how things turn out? Or would it look just a bit f***ing stupid for it to suddenly have them after three films where it didn't? Do we really want 3ft tall, dumb as a bag of spanners Velociraptors? It's a film series about cloned dinosaurs eating people, a series that has gotten a lot of people interested in palaeontology (despite it's jaw-dropping, glaring inaccuracies  ::)). I will see the film sometime in the next week, and I'm quite sure my enjoyment of it won't be spoiled by a lack of f***ing quills. If there's people out there that can't get over something that trivial, then I honestly pity them...

You clearly have ZERO understanding of dinosaur science and why it matters. If you really think it's that inconsequential, then go and do some research into how much Jurassic Park has influenced the way people perceive dinosaurs.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 12, 2015, 03:34:51 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 12, 2015, 02:57:50 PM
The magic of Jurassic Park is finally back ladies and gentlemen, and I lovingly suggest anyone reading this post to just go, go and see this movie where it should be seen: on a big, gargantuan cinema screen. See it with your partner, your friends, your family, your kids -- or even alone. You will not regret it.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fthedailywh.at%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F06%2F061115prattraptorsbike.gif&hash=3a1e54cbba629ff3cc2ee4c042355fc86490744b)

Glad you enjoyed it dude! I'm hoping you'll eventually write up an article around the Indominus. ;D

While you're here...did you see any cool cosplay in L.A.?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 12, 2015, 04:22:26 PM
I'd just like to add, Omega makes a good point about Phil Tippett's work - the animations are magnificent, everything moves in an unusually believable and charismatic way. I'm sure there's a parallel universe out there where he's widely lauded as the next generation Ray Harryhausen.

The Indominus looks particularly impressive to me. I love the way it occasionally squats into a quadrupedal pose, which is something you couldn't really do with a proper dinosaur carnivore (Spinosaurus speculation aside).

When it comes to creature designs though, I mentioned that the recurring dinosaur species don't match their JP series predecessors. I've had trouble putting my finger on what's wrong with the raptors (size weirdness aside), but just read Andrea Cau point it out on Facebook - they have teeth going right the way back to below their eyes, which would mean they couldn't even be classified as theropods.

When you look at the points that the dinosaurs are neither accurate nor series-consistent, it makes me wonder if the real reason they never tried to make fuzzy raptors/Gallimimus as menacing/iconic as the scaly originals was that the designers just weren't up to the challenge.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 12, 2015, 04:31:30 PM
It's bizarre when you think about it because they would definitely have maquettes et al from Winston Studio to scan and from which to take reference.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 12, 2015, 04:54:48 PM
Not necessarily. A lot of stuff was sold at auction two years after JP 3 was released. It's possible they don't have them anymore.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Novak 1334 on Jun 12, 2015, 04:58:01 PM
Just got back from seeing the movie.  Disappointing to say the least
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 12, 2015, 05:23:19 PM
About the finale....

Spoiler

The Tyrannosaurus Rex was probably feeling challenged. Mama Rex was the only Rex in the park and the I-Rex's base was a T-rex... So this abomination most likely felt like a territorial tresspasser.
[close]

By the way, I'm only upset that Jeff Goldblum didnt make a cameo after the credits on a talk show about the events.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 12, 2015, 05:32:25 PM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2015/06/12/two-smithsonian-paleontologists-review-jurassic-world/

Quote'I enjoyed the whole absurdity of it': Paleontologists review 'Jurassic World.'
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 12, 2015, 05:58:02 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 12, 2015, 04:54:48 PM
Not necessarily. A lot of stuff was sold at auction two years after JP 3 was released. It's possible they don't have them anymore.
And can't track them down. Wow.

Not to mention there is stuff from the other two movies too. AND there would be photos and most importantly moulds.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 12, 2015, 05:58:53 PM
Well if someone else owns it, they're under no obligation to let the studio use it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 12, 2015, 06:19:21 PM
Well, I see more positive reviews than negative. Anyway I'll find out for myself, in a few hours. Although I will not make any review, since it's not my thing ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 12, 2015, 07:20:40 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 12, 2015, 05:58:53 PM
Well if someone else owns it, they're under no obligation to let the studio use it.
As if that hasn't happened several times in the past.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: viendammage on Jun 12, 2015, 08:10:57 PM
Watched part 3 to prep this week. Was surprised how funny, weird and scary it is. The dinosaurs are so well done throughout with the practical puppets and they're just so mean! The raptor on the plane in the dream sequence? Gah! And the Pterodactyl that turns and looks into camera saw into my soul!

As for Jurassic World, it wasn't a bad time, just filled with cliches. I mean the hybrid dinosaur with extra powers was out of a SyFy movie and the push to weaponize them wasn't very original either. Nice to see the dinosaurs were main event here and not pushed to the back like in Godzilla and Transformers en lieu of lame human characters. The water based Shamu-saurus whatever was cool.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 12, 2015, 08:52:04 PM
Jurassic World once again displays mans arrogance of doing things just because they can. A little worrisome as the sequel could be called Chimera Park since holy-shit-a-saurus was a chimera.

Also didn't Dr. Wu state that dinos were way more intelligent than those at the park but that Hammond wanted dumb ones because that was the public's perception of dinos at the time? Maybe from the books?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 12, 2015, 09:07:45 PM
Other way round, Wu wanted to (but didn't) dumb down the dinosaurs because their authentic replications turned out to be smarter/faster than the general public would expect.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 12, 2015, 09:23:54 PM
Just saw JW, it was pretty good for the most part, and had a lot of awesome moments in it. Certain parts were kind of crap, like the pointless, go nowhere stuff with the kids' parents and basically everything to do with Hoskins.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomorphine on Jun 12, 2015, 09:56:05 PM
Regardless of my positive opinion of the film, I was basically right in my own predictions about the famous I Rex addition... They should have just used an Allosaurus and said it had an unexpected or deliberate size mutation. There were only a few minor things which justified it being an entirely new creature and they didn't really feel necessary. To all intents and purposes, it was just a conventional Rex with more useful arms.

If you're going to say you've made a totally new thing and added in cuttlefish DNA (of all things), then make the design properly exotic to justify that label. Otherwise, just use what you already have to hand.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 12, 2015, 10:04:07 PM
I think the pointless kids stuff worked. I went into this movie wanting the kids to get eating but halfway through I felt bad for the lads. I actually felt bad for the babysitter.

Still no one but staff saw the iRex so I figure the cover up will be a terrorist attack on the pteranodon house.

Quote from: Xenomorphine on Jun 12, 2015, 09:56:05 PMTo all intents and purposes, it was just a conventional Rex with more useful arms.
It. Was. Perfect.


Quote from: XenomorphineIf you're going to say you've made a totally new thing and added in cuttlefish DNA (of all things), then make the design properly exotic to justify that label. Otherwise, just use what you already have to hand.
They added it in for reasons other than enhancement. Wu was surprised by how it hid it's thermal signature. They were basically f**king around because they could and to quote Ian, they never stopped to ask if they should. The entire point about profits and customer expectations is hog wash. Geneticist create monsters because they want to.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Jun 12, 2015, 10:08:33 PM
Saw the movie this morning. loved it! 9/10 for me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 12, 2015, 10:32:16 PM
The movie was good. But I have some doubts ...

Quote from: Xenomorphine on Jun 12, 2015, 09:56:05 PM
Regardless of my positive opinion of the film, I was basically right in my own predictions about the famous I Rex addition... They should have just used an Allosaurus and said it had an unexpected or deliberate size mutation. There were only a few minor things which justified it being an entirely new creature and they didn't really feel necessary. To all intents and purposes, it was just a conventional Rex with more useful arms.

If you're going to say you've made a totally new thing and added in cuttlefish DNA (of all things), then make the design properly exotic to justify that label. Otherwise, just use what you already have to hand.

Indominus Rex was like a Carcharodontosaurid with extra long arms. By the way...what are the similarities with T.Rex? because it is assumed that the creature has Tyranosaurus DNA, but at the same time Giganotosaurus DNA, which I believe is reflected in her size and and overall appearance...but exactly what are the similarities with Rex? was the strength of her jaws? or the power of the roar?

Although the similarities with Abelisaurids are very noticeable. About the long arms...I guess is due to Velociraptor DNA (involving also all that about intelligence). Unless Spinosaurid DNA is part of the creature, but I doubt it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gazz on Jun 12, 2015, 11:16:32 PM
Overall I thought JW was average. There's a lot of fun individual moments and one very neat twist for the raptors but it's strung together by filmmakers and writers who seem to be at odds over what type of film they want to make. Trevorrow makes the same mistake as Bird did with Tomorrowland in that the film they're making seems to be the very thing they're criticising. For example, Trevorrow has one of the character's remark how corporate the park is in regards to product placement in a clear nudge-nudge-wink-wink about how corporate modern films have become, yet there are several moments of obvious product placement littered through the film. There are shots that entirely serve to sell a f**king car.

I also think Trevorrow utterly misses the tone of Spielberg's classic. Jurassic Park was about mining excitement out of the wonder of seeing something you've never seen before. World seems to be about drawing excitement from seeing those wonderful things either kill everything in sight or be killed. Sure there's the element of danger about Jurassic Park, and there are some gnarly death scenes, but it rarely comes across as cruel (the exception being the opening kill). World felt cruel to me.

Also, the placement of the Jurassic Park theme bugged me. In Park it's saved for the new guests witnessing a living dinosaur for the first time. It's literally something they have never seen before (nor the audience seen realised in such a realistic way before). It's a moment of absolute wonder. With World it's used for a view of the parks busy main street, which very much resembles something of an exotic Disney World. It's the type of view seen on multiple adverts for theme parks. There's nothing wondrous about it at all. It's corporate. Fell very flat for me.

I liked the stuff with the Raptors, though I can see the execution of them bugging a lot of fans. It's certainly a lot better than JP3 and despite my above issues there is some fun to be had. It just pales in comparison to the original and even The Lost World in my opinion.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jun 12, 2015, 11:29:34 PM
I personally really enjoy it and I like it better then the last two sequels. I found the movie a lot of fun start to finish. While the human is not perfect, they where likeable and I care about them to see them make out alive. The CG is good, but I do feel like it could have been a bit better though. Since this is a fictional sci-fi movie, I just go with the flow and ignore the bad paleontologist stuff. The dinosaurs in the movie are fictional no different how other fictional dinosaurs are like Godzilla. I give it a 7.5/10.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 12, 2015, 11:51:40 PM

Jeff SneiderVerified account
‏@TheInSneider

THIS JUST IN: According to estimates as of 4 p.m., JURASSIC WORLD is on pace for a $162 million opening weekend... http://www.thewrap.com/jurassic-world-on-pace-for-impressive-162-million-opening-weekend/ ...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 13, 2015, 12:13:58 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 12, 2015, 05:23:19 PM
About the finale....

Spoiler

The Tyrannosaurus Rex was probably feeling challenged. Mama Rex was the only Rex in the park and the I-Rex's base was a T-rex... So this abomination most likely felt like a territorial tresspasser.
[close]

By the way, I'm only upset that Jeff Goldblum didnt make a cameo after the credits on a talk show about the events.

pherhaps he isnt a full retard to give his name to this nonsense
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 13, 2015, 12:21:15 AM
Quote from: szkoki on Jun 13, 2015, 12:13:58 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 12, 2015, 05:23:19 PM
About the finale....

Spoiler

The Tyrannosaurus Rex was probably feeling challenged. Mama Rex was the only Rex in the park and the I-Rex's base was a T-rex... So this abomination most likely felt like a territorial tresspasser.
[close]

By the way, I'm only upset that Jeff Goldblum didnt make a cameo after the credits on a talk show about the events.

pherhaps he isnt a full retard to give his name to this nonsense
Well aren't you classy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: viendammage on Jun 13, 2015, 12:45:07 AM
Quote from: szkoki on Jun 13, 2015, 12:13:58 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 12, 2015, 05:23:19 PM
About the finale....

Spoiler

The Tyrannosaurus Rex was probably feeling challenged. Mama Rex was the only Rex in the park and the I-Rex's base was a T-rex... So this abomination most likely felt like a territorial tresspasser.
[close]

By the way, I'm only upset that Jeff Goldblum didnt make a cameo after the credits on a talk show about the events.

pherhaps he isnt a full retard to give his name to this nonsense

He actually appears in the film on the back of Malcolm's book in a couple of scenes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 13, 2015, 01:09:55 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 13, 2015, 12:21:15 AM
Quote from: szkoki on Jun 13, 2015, 12:13:58 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 12, 2015, 05:23:19 PM
About the finale....

Spoiler

The Tyrannosaurus Rex was probably feeling challenged. Mama Rex was the only Rex in the park and the I-Rex's base was a T-rex... So this abomination most likely felt like a territorial tresspasser.
[close]

By the way, I'm only upset that Jeff Goldblum didnt make a cameo after the credits on a talk show about the events.

pherhaps he isnt a full retard to give his name to this nonsense
Well aren't you classy.

okay honestly i feel like im in a parallel universe now. and honestly - no intention to harm any people - but how could someone like this movie even just a bit? point out its good things really. at every board people(die hard JP fans most of the time!) say "it is 9/10, almost better than the original, enjoyed every bit, best JP movie ever" etc

okay if someone love these types of movies, like some people love to see horror movies or super hero movies, wich are certain category but no ...still no, i just cant accept this title as a summer blockbuster, action, thriller, we should accept it what it is and we should turn our brains off movie ....i mean what??? you know what kind of movies are described like this? killer shark vs giant octopus, sharknado, but these are only low budget movies, thats the only diffo. this is exactly what JW is, and it makes me sad and even more sad that this is what the world wanted after all for 22 yrs.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPa5oVG-nII


its like i would be one of the fews who would criticise Aliens: Colonial Marines
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: viendammage on Jun 13, 2015, 01:33:38 AM
Quote from: szkoki on Jun 13, 2015, 01:09:55 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 13, 2015, 12:21:15 AM
Quote from: szkoki on Jun 13, 2015, 12:13:58 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 12, 2015, 05:23:19 PM
About the finale....

Spoiler

The Tyrannosaurus Rex was probably feeling challenged. Mama Rex was the only Rex in the park and the I-Rex's base was a T-rex... So this abomination most likely felt like a territorial tresspasser.
[close]

By the way, I'm only upset that Jeff Goldblum didnt make a cameo after the credits on a talk show about the events.

pherhaps he isnt a full retard to give his name to this nonsense
Well aren't you classy.

okay honestly i feel like im in a parallel universe now. and honestly - no intention to harm any people - but how could someone like this movie even just a bit? point out its good things really. at every board people(die hard JP fans most of the time!) say "it is 9/10, almost better than the original, enjoyed every bit, best JP movie ever" etc

okay if someone love these types of movies, like some people love to see horror movies or super hero movies, wich are certain category but no ...still no, i just cant accept this title as a summer blockbuster, action, thriller, we should accept it what it is and we should turn our brains off movie ....i mean what??? you know what kind of movies are described like this? killer shark vs giant octopus, sharknado, but these are only low budget movies, thats the only diffo. this is exactly what JW is, and it makes me sad and even more sad that this is what the world wanted after all for 22 yrs.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPa5oVG-nII


its like i would be one of the fews who would criticise Aliens: Colonial Marines


That was actually my biggest issue with the film, the SyFy movie aspect mixed with evil corporation wanting to weaponize, etc. BUT Jurassic World isn't exactly the first film guilty of that. Just ask Roger Corman whose business began to corrode when studios started making big budget B genre movies decades ago.

http://www.dammagedgoods.com/2015/06/summer-cinema-jurassic-world.html
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomorphine on Jun 13, 2015, 01:37:57 AM
Guys, be civil...

The thermal and camo stuff hardly featured, at all. They could have done away with those plot points and the story would have still run the same.

The creature design similarities with Rex were fairly obvious. The arms were more useful, but it essentially comformed to the same kind of body profile. The differences were superficial/cosmetic, at best. It could have been replaced with a Rex with brain chemistry anger issues and, again, the basic story would have gone down much the same. I don't think the film really gained much by introducing a Rex 2.0.

Spoiler
Yes, there's the velociraptor communication, which I thought was cleverly handled, but having them turn on their human handlers seemed like a foregone conclusion, no matter what. Again, it didn't really justify the I Rex existence.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Jun 13, 2015, 02:53:13 AM
Quote from: Crazy Shrimp on Jun 12, 2015, 10:32:16 PM
Indominus Rex was like a Carcharodontosaurid with extra long arms...

but exactly what are the similarities with Rex? was the strength of her jaws? or the power of the roar?

No, it was the role it played in the plot of the movie. Big dinosaur breaks out, wreaks havoc. T Rex has already done that.

The new features are either superficial in comparison to the T rex or were only featured once and discarded rendering them relatively pointless.

Spoiler
example, the camouflage. It's shown once, then never seen again. When it is used. It's not used to great effect on screen. It just appears, and attacks. T Rex did that in JP when it burst through the bushes and chased the Jeep. The I Rex's camouflage is never seen again
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jun 13, 2015, 03:05:10 AM
I wonder what they can do for a 5th film? I feel like that they are out of ideas for this franchise.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PVTDukeMorrison on Jun 13, 2015, 03:44:03 AM
I just got back from the premier here in Ottawa, to start off there were no more seats so I had to sit on the floor. Thankfully that was the worst part of my experience. Overall I have to say I enjoyed this movie, it wasn't a fantastic film, but it was fun and miles ahead of TLW and JP3. Some of the comedy relief was a unnecessary, but it wasn't too intrusive, it just kind of killed the tension at times.

One scene in particular I appreciated, as I'm sure most people here did as well
Spoiler
The scene when the InGen security team goes into the jungle to hunt the I-Rex, and you were seeing it through cameras and their statuses were on display in the control room as Pratt and co. watched, that whole scene just screamed Aliens.
[close]
My biggest gripe of the entire film was when
Spoiler
Vincent D'Onofrio's character was killed off, he's trying to reason with Blue and I was sitting there the whole time saying "It's a f**king animal, what are you doing". It would have been so much better if it just showed up mid sentence and killed him off.
[close]
I also liked how the kids in the movie weren't annoying as hell as kids tend to be in films, I don't know, they just felt more believable to me. One thing I really hated though was the lack practical effects, I saw little to no animatronics/puppets during the entire film, they relied way to heavily on CG.

About the ending
Spoiler
When blue was running in all in slow motion, I won't lie, I kind of laughed, it was so stupid but also just so damn awesome, it was like something out of The Avengers. And when Momma Rex and Blue stare each other down in the end, you can see Blue slowly backing off and the rex did just take one hell of an ass whuppin' from the I-Rex, so I'm okay with them not going at it after killing the I-Rex, it's all Hollywood make believe people, it doesn't have to be 100% realism.
[close]

Overall I'd give Jurassic World a 75%, it's leagues better than JP3 (60%), and in my opinion it was better than TLW (70%).
+Lots of fun
+Good acting from the stars
+Some really great tense moments
+
Spoiler
T-Rex vs I-Rex
[close]
-Some really bad supporting actors (That scene when the mother starts crying over the phone)
-Predictable plot
-Hollywood cliches
-No Goldblum

I don't know why but one scene in particular got to me, when the kid opens the doors and it does a shot of the park with the theme playing, for some reason that just gave me a great feeling that is surprisingly hard to explain through text. Also when the film ended people were clapping, and these little kids all around were talking about dinosaurs. The reason that got to me is that dinosaurs were a huge part of my childhood, but kids today seem to have forgotten about them, most of my little cousins for example couldn't give 2 shits about dinosaurs, so seeing little kids interested in dinosaurs makes me pretty happy.

Overall: 75%
I know I'm terrible at reviews, spare me
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Jun 13, 2015, 04:03:44 AM
Quote from: PVTDukeMorrison on Jun 13, 2015, 03:44:03 AM

My biggest gripe of the entire film was when
Spoiler
Vincent D'Onofrio's character was killed off, he's trying to reason with Blue and I was sitting there the whole time saying "It's a f**king animal, what are you doing". It would have been so much better if it just showed up mid sentence and killed him off.
[close]
One thing I really hated though was the lack practical effects, I saw little to no animatronics/puppets during the entire film, they relied way to heavily on CG.

Yes! This is what I was thinking as well.
Spoiler
There's so much potential wasted in this film. It's so close to being good, but it fizzles constantly. There's too many distractions. A Jurassic Park velociraptor would have savagely mauled that guy. This raptor feels neutered.  Imagine if vince goes full eviltard and monologues about what he's going to do with the dinosaurs, with the main characters on their knees in front of him, at gunpoint, at his whim. When Blue surprisingly and suddenly appears next to him like a clever girl... instead it just strolls in, ignores the others and stares at the fat bad guy before eventually deciding to bite him.
[close]
Also the cg, it looked good enough, freeze any moment and it looks good, but the movements... the body language of the dinosaurs were all wrong. They were all different to what any previous JP dinosaurs did. This for me was too distracting.
Spoiler
Especially the T rex. The way it's head wobbled as it walked... Just everything about it felt wrong to me. As I said earlier in the thread it looked more like the land of the lost t rex then the og t rex from jp
[close]

Quote from: PVTDukeMorrison on Jun 13, 2015, 03:44:03 AM
About the ending
Spoiler
When blue was running in all in slow motion, I won't lie, I kind of laughed, it was so stupid but also just so damn awesome, it was like something out of The Avengers. .
[close]

Yeah, It was at this point that I
Spoiler
literally shuddered at how bad it is and I've never done that with any film before. I could only pray that it would all be over soon
[close]

Quote from: PVTDukeMorrison on Jun 13, 2015, 03:44:03 AM
I don't know why but one scene in particular got to me, when the kid opens the doors and it does a shot of the park with the theme playing, for some reason that just gave me a great feeling that is surprisingly hard to explain through text.

I felt the same way. So many feels in this movie. So many highs and lows, the lows for the wrong reasons lol.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 13, 2015, 06:17:10 AM
Quote from: bloodinthemud on Jun 13, 2015, 04:03:44 AM
Quote from: PVTDukeMorrison on Jun 13, 2015, 03:44:03 AM

My biggest gripe of the entire film was when
Spoiler
Vincent D'Onofrio's character was killed off, he's trying to reason with Blue and I was sitting there the whole time saying "It's a f**king animal, what are you doing". It would have been so much better if it just showed up mid sentence and killed him off.
[close]
One thing I really hated though was the lack practical effects, I saw little to no animatronics/puppets during the entire film, they relied way to heavily on CG.

Yes! This is what I was thinking as well.
Spoiler
There's so much potential wasted in this film. It's so close to being good, but it fizzles constantly. There's too many distractions. A Jurassic Park velociraptor would have savagely mauled that guy. This raptor feels neutered.  Imagine if vince goes full eviltard and monologues about what he's going to do with the dinosaurs, with the main characters on their knees in front of him, at gunpoint, at his whim. When Blue surprisingly and suddenly appears next to him like a clever girl... instead it just strolls in, ignores the others and stares at the fat bad guy before eventually deciding to bite him.
[close]
Also the cg, it looked good enough, freeze any moment and it looks good, but the movements... the body language of the dinosaurs were all wrong. They were all different to what any previous JP dinosaurs did. This for me was too distracting.
Spoiler
Especially the T rex. The way it's head wobbled as it walked... Just everything about it felt wrong to me. As I said earlier in the thread it looked more like the land of the lost t rex then the og t rex from jp
[close]

Quote from: PVTDukeMorrison on Jun 13, 2015, 03:44:03 AM
About the ending
Spoiler
When blue was running in all in slow motion, I won't lie, I kind of laughed, it was so stupid but also just so damn awesome, it was like something out of The Avengers. .
[close]

Yeah, It was at this point that I
Spoiler
literally shuddered at how bad it is and I've never done that with any film before. I could only pray that it would all be over soon
[close]

Quote from: PVTDukeMorrison on Jun 13, 2015, 03:44:03 AM
I don't know why but one scene in particular got to me, when the kid opens the doors and it does a shot of the park with the theme playing, for some reason that just gave me a great feeling that is surprisingly hard to explain through text.

I felt the same way. So many feels in this movie. So many highs and lows, the lows for the wrong reasons lol.

Spoiler
Bruh the T-rex is like 30 years old by the time this film takes place and real life Rexes probably didn't live much longer than 40 years. She was old.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jun 13, 2015, 06:26:25 AM
Too bad the Pteranodons from the ending of Jurassic Park III where never mention ever again. We never knew what happen after wards.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 13, 2015, 06:48:57 AM
Shit, thought if I went in the morning and bought some tickets I could see it again tonight... Imax is sold da fuk out till monday.  :o

Also this movie is way better than how the earlier crowd and critics made it out to be. Jurassic Park is to Alien as Jurassic World is to Aliens! :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 13, 2015, 07:45:38 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstream1.gifsoup.com%2Fview8%2F20140320%2F5004060%2Fturk-tells-whitney-the-snapper-get-out-o.gif&hash=a0f03e5769ecc0069a206c5c4acf4c9d1de41251)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Wrecktangle on Jun 13, 2015, 07:57:19 AM
Quote from: szkoki on Jun 13, 2015, 07:45:38 AM
http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view8/20140320/5004060/turk-tells-whitney-the-snapper-get-out-o.gif

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg4.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20110817043543%2Fadventuretimewithfinnandjake%2Fimages%2Fd%2Fd1%2FOh-he-mad.jpg&hash=137dd1c39d28de79e3c8e09908f6882a7a495403)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 13, 2015, 08:32:53 AM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Jun 13, 2015, 06:26:25 AM
Too bad the Pteranodons from the ending of Jurassic Park III where never mention ever again. We never knew what happen after wards.

One of the viral sites for JW actually tied into that. It mentions that Hoskins got the security job at the park because his team was responsible for wiping them out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Jun 13, 2015, 09:24:51 AM
So why isn't there an art of book yet?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Jun 13, 2015, 09:31:11 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jun 13, 2015, 06:48:57 AMJurassic Park is to Alien as Jurassic World is to Aliens! :P

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pikotietlesrobots.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F06%2FBruceAngry.gif&hash=113d98893b0f4188193149cd789e29c5270450b9)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 13, 2015, 10:19:49 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg4.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20110817043543%2Fadventuretimewithfinnandjake%2Fimages%2Fd%2Fd1%2FOh-he-mad.jpg&hash=137dd1c39d28de79e3c8e09908f6882a7a495403)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jun 13, 2015, 11:54:27 AM
Saw this last night. Had an utter blast. This movie is the reason people go to the theater. Just adored every single second.


Spoiler
The T.Rex fighting the Indominus was very well done. It had the T.Rex get some really good licks in before the Indominus gained the upper hand. It was just a fantastic fight. When she got her second wind and threw the Indominus through a goddamn building... Just a fantastic scene. Also really loved the raptors turning on the soldiers and killing them all. Their POV camera shots were really badass and chilling. Of course it's not as good as the first, but it is BY FAR the best Jurassic Park sequel, and the most fun I have EVER had in the movie theater.
[close]

It had my mom's friend, who isn't really a JP fan, cheering and jumping in her seat. That should tell you enough. f**k the haters, this movie is a fantastic ride.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 13, 2015, 01:40:04 PM
I've walked out of the theatre, eyes blinking. Here's my review.

Spoiler
I'm known arguably as the biggest Jurassic Park fan on this forum and certainly anyone who knows me knows how much I love both the original film and the series as a whole. That said, this is going to be an interesting review for me to write.

I've never been so conflicted over a single film prior to seeing it. My inner fanboy was more excited than anything to see the film, yet I was wary due to both the incredibly long wait time for the film's release after all the ups and downs over the past 14 years and due to the negative reviews that were coming not just from critics but also from bona fide JP fans. Overall, I liked it the film. Lots, in fact. But I'm also not such a rabid fan that I'm blind to its faults.

Let's start with the good. The film jumps right into its action as the plot moves along at a pace that suits the story perfectly. In Jurassic Park 3, everything happened too quickly and it was over too soon. There was no sense of tension or dread or even urgency to the characters' actions. It really felt like they were literally walking from point A to point B, waiting for the next action sequence to kick in. In Jurassic World, that doesn't seem to be the case. We are introduced to a park that has been operating for a good amount of time and so of course, there's no real need to build up to the reveal of the dinosaurs like in the first Jurassic Park. We know what to expect. The park is well-designed. The Samsung Innovation Centre was really awesome and I liked the "Hammond Creation Centre". I'm surprised the Hammond statue wasn't highlighted at some point. People mill about, ooing and awing at the attractions like most people at an average zoo.

The set up for Indominus Rex is exactly what it needs to be. People are bored, park does some research, people want something new so the brilliant engineers (not really brilliant), under the direction of Dr. Henry Wu (B.D. Wong from JP), create a hybrid dinosaur made up of Rex and raptor DNA. Sidenote, technically, every dinosaur in JP since the beginning was a hybrid since they were made of dinosaur and frog DNA but that's a debate for another time. Anyway, the new dinosaur turns out to be too dangerous for the park to contain and, as expected, breaks free of its enclosure and wreaks havoc upon the handlers and visitors.

I really liked I.rex. The design was quite nice and as I suspected, it look considerably nicer on screen and in action than all the promo shots provided us with. It's essentially a souped-up albino Giganotosaurus. The adding of the camouflage effect was nice as it was clearly lifted from the Carnotaurus in The Lost World (novel) and used to great effect. The scene in which this ability is revealed is executed very well. I found the soldier's line, right before he dies, "IT CAN CAMOUFLAGE!" a bit unnecessary as it's pretty obvious to the audience what is going on. Indominus goes on a rampage across the non-visitor areas of the park and goes crazy as it should. I would have liked an explanation for how the hell it manager to grow an opposable thumb though. Unless it had human DNA (!), I don't know of any animal which possesses such a digit that was infused in the Rex's DNA.

Perhaps my favourite Indominus moment was the Ankylosaur fight. It was fantastic to finally see Ankylosaurus have a chance to shine in a dinosaur movie as he's quite underrepresented in the genre. The fight looked great. The aftermath was even better, when Indominus sees the Gyrosphere and proceeds to dismantle it using her head. She was indeed an intelligent animal and she showed it well.

The raptors were also good. I'm on-board with the idea of training them. As others pointed out in past discussions, we train modern animals to perform all sorts of tasks so there is no real reason to think we couldn't do the same with a dinosaur. For whatever reason the main counter-argument to this is that it's a dinosaur and that somehow means it can't be trained, but whatever.

The human characters worked for what they needed to be even if Pratt and D'Onofrio were talking cliches. The former was a wise-cracking survivalist and the former a hard military-man who believes the only way to stop Indominus is to gung-ho with guns blazing . Frankly it's hard to disagree with him when you consider the amount of damage Indominus create. Claire (played by Bryce Dallas Howard) was a good character who evolved nicely as the story moved along. She went from a super-serious, super-anal corporate figure to a compassionate and understanding human being once she realized just how much carnage Indominus was causing and that for all her talk of corporate profits, maintenance, etc..., once her nephews were in trouble, none of that mattered. She went from capitalist to humanitarian in less than two hours, that's, that's gotta be a record. Also, the claims about sexism and such, just ignore them. She does what she needs to do and that's all there is to it.

As for carnage, Jake Johnson was entertaining and fun to watch. His character along with Pratt's felt like they both had shades of Ian Malcolm in them. Lowery briefly, when referencing his desk space which Claire instructs him to tidy up, mentions something about stability and order which of course are central tenets of Malcolm's favourite theory, chaos theory. Pratt of course talks about the hybrid being a bad idea and how the park dun goofed, as it were, as they cannot control this new animal. Even the park's tracking technology, which is top-of-the-line and advanced in every way, proves fruitless in keeping tabs on the beast. Lowery also struck me as the "good guy version" of Dennis Nedry. I saw some parallels, especially in the look of his character; glasses, his wardrobe, and even the unkempt work space. He provided some good laughs and he wasn't obnoxious about it either.

The kids were good. I don't have much to say about Ty Simpkins or Nick Robinson. They didn't bore me or annoy me. I felt the inclusion of the subplot about their parents' upcoming divorce was unnecessary as it didn't add anything to the story and it certainly never went anywhere, but that's a minor gripe. B.D. Wong made a rather triumphant return and it was a pleasure to see more of Henry Wu. His character turn once the Indominus goes on the rampage was reminiscent of the more cynical Wu we meet later on in the Jurassic Park novel who argues with Hammond on the designs of the dinosaurs, which I will touch on later.

Now for the bad. Let's start with the main attraction: the dinosaurs. In terms of their rendering, I felt it was good but not great. The CGI was quite noticeable and very little animatronic worked seems to have made it into the movie, aside from the Apatosaurus head that Owen and Claire cradle. When watching them on-screen, I could very much tell they were CG creations. Maybe it's because they were glistening in the light but it was very obvious. They just didn't have that realistic feel to them that the dinosaurs in the first film did. Remember the Velociraptor hatchling from the first film? The opening scene with the Indominus hatchling isn't even half as good. The raptor looked 100% real. This one though, not so much. Certainly they were very, very well animated. Their movements were fluid and they moved like real animals. They had personalities which the third JP film brought in and it really brings the animals to life.

But...and as much as lots of people here (two in particular) are sick of hearing about this, the inaccuracy was off the charts! It's not even just the feathers. Forget that for a second, but the dinosaurs don't even match up with the designs from the first film! I'm not kidding. Look at the Triceratops, Gallimimus, T.rex, and Velociraptor from Jurassic World and then look at the ones in Jurassic Park. The Triceratops head has been altered, the Gallimimus look more like ostriches (and I don't mean that in a good way), the T.Rex's arms were redesigned and she just felt very different from the animal in the first film, and the raptors looks much bigger than the first film's versions. I did like their colouring scheme, especially Blue's. The blue and white streaks were a nice touch. But back to my critique, I shudder to think how this film will influence dinosaurs in pop culture. The science matters and it's about time a major dinosaur film embraced it.

Yes, yes, I know Dr. Wu explicitly states that if the genetic code were pure then they would look different. I really do appreciate that Colin kept that line in the film and it does help, but ultimately, given the massive amount of misinformation out there coupled with peoples' perceptions of Jurassic Park, they probably won't fully understand what Henry meant.

Further on the dinosaurs, I was disappointed that the Spinosaurus and the Dilophosaurus especially did not return. I guess having two big carnivores was enough and T.rex more or less had her revenge when she plowed through the Spinosaurus skeleton but it still would've been cool to see the Spined Lizard. The Dilophosaurus is back, but only in the form of a hologram, briefly displayed to distract a raptor while Claire, Owen, Gray, and Zach run away. That really upset me. I've never understood why he doesn't get more love. People loved the Dilo scene from the first film, she affectionately earned the nickname "Spitter" so audiences love her, so what the Hell Colin?! Why u no bring more Dilo? I really felt like the ideal place to bring them back into the picture would've been when the kids stumble upon the old Visitor's Centre. Considering it was the old part of the park, why not?

This is not a gripe; the Indominus/Rex fight was terrific. It was very OTT but it made sense and confirmed much of people's suspicions about how Rexy would return. I didn't really care for Raptor Ex Machina. Where the hell did Blue come from? Indominus slapped her rather hard into a concrete wall and then she's suddenly back on her feet like nothing happened. I mean, really? That ending with the mosasaur though was entirely unexpected. It gave me a jump which I liked but I would have preferred T.rex to finish off Indominus with a powerful blow to the neck and stand triumphantly. T.rex's last stand on the roof of the building right before the credits role was a bit corny. I could've done without it.

Speaking of corny, this film certainly had its share of corny moments. My girlfriend thought that they were deliberately written into the film for laughs but they annoyed me regardless. "Who else can fly this chopper?" *close-up* "We don't need anyone else." Ugh...just... Jurassic Park is no place for cheesiness like that.

I'll probably think of more stuff to say but in the meantime, I will conclude with the following. Jurassic World is a good movie. It's a fun and entertaining movie. It's a movie that people will enjoy and is very worthy of being an entry to the Jurassic Park series. It's WAAAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYY better than Jurassic Park 3 or The Lost World. It doesn't surpass the first film but then again, nothing will. Overall, 8/10 from me. Thank you Colin, thank you Legendary Pictures, and thank you Universal Studios. "You did it. You crazy son of a bitch, you did it."
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jun 13, 2015, 01:59:01 PM
Just got back from seeing it.

It started out well enough but it fell apart by the end. It just turned into a dumb monster movie. By the time we have Prett leading dinos into battle on a motorcycle and raptors running in "heroic" slow mo through the carnage I just about gave up.

It's better than the third (not hard) but nowhere near as good as the first two. They at least portrayed the dinosaurs as wild animals rather than cardboard movie monsters that exist just to duke it out. I will say the references to the previous entries were very well done though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Jun 13, 2015, 05:09:24 PM
Can someone explain how this movie has apparently had the biggest opening ever?  :o

Bigger than both Avengers movies?? really?! I don't believe it.

Most reviews I've read and seen are average at best.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Jun 13, 2015, 05:20:04 PM
Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 13, 2015, 05:09:24 PM
Can someone explain how this movie has apparently had the biggest opening ever?  :o

Bigger than both Avengers movies?? really?! I don't believe it.

Most reviews I've read and seen are average at best.


Strange, most reviews i've read are mostly positive.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Scree on Jun 13, 2015, 05:40:26 PM
Well, it certainly wasn't my fault. I have no interest in watching Jurassic World but obviously a lot people enjoy this movie very much. Good for them and Universal.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jun 13, 2015, 05:46:13 PM
Hubbs always comes into major popular movie threads and finds ways to downplay them like he did with Mad Max 4, Avengers 2, Godzilla 2014 and a few others in the past from what I can remember. Good marketing, good word of mouth and the first JW movie in almost 15 years is the reason why the movie is going to have a major box office opening weekend.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 13, 2015, 06:36:13 PM
The movie is a true summer blockbuster. That's how it's going to possibly pull in $200 million this weekend. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Jun 13, 2015, 06:37:30 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Jun 13, 2015, 05:46:13 PM
Hubbs always comes into major popular movie threads and finds ways to downplay them like he did with Mad Max 4, Avengers 2, Godzilla 2014 and a few others in the past from what I can remember. Good marketing, good word of mouth and the first JW movie in almost 15 years is the reason why the movie is going to have a major box office opening weekend.

I'm serious, even Jeremy Jahns wasn't overly impressed and that's saying something.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Jun 13, 2015, 06:59:03 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jun 13, 2015, 06:36:13 PM
The movie is a true summer blockbuster. That's how it's going to possibly pull in $200 million this weekend. :)
What if they do Fast and Furious + Jurassic Park = Cadilacs & Dinosaurs

Both are franchises owned by Universal... Just saying ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Wrecktangle on Jun 13, 2015, 07:08:52 PM
Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 13, 2015, 06:37:30 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Jun 13, 2015, 05:46:13 PM
Hubbs always comes into major popular movie threads and finds ways to downplay them like he did with Mad Max 4, Avengers 2, Godzilla 2014 and a few others in the past from what I can remember. Good marketing, good word of mouth and the first JW movie in almost 15 years is the reason why the movie is going to have a major box office opening weekend.

I'm serious, even Jeremy Jahns wasn't overly impressed and that's saying something.

Majority of the reviews say otherwise. I like Jahns, usually, but sometimes he's way off the mark. JW is defs a blu ray buy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 13, 2015, 07:17:50 PM
Quote from: Magegg on Jun 13, 2015, 06:59:03 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jun 13, 2015, 06:36:13 PM
The movie is a true summer blockbuster. That's how it's going to possibly pull in $200 million this weekend. :)
What if they do Fast and Furious + Jurassic Park = Cadilacs & Dinosaurs

Both are franchises owned by Universal... Just saying ;)

LOL. I'd love to see a cartoon of it again, anyway.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Njm1983 on Jun 13, 2015, 08:04:37 PM
Just got back from seeing it. What a ride. I had a good time had the major awesome feels like being a kid again. My anticipation was outta control when
Spoiler
the t Rex makes her appearance during the finale
[close]
I didn't know what to do - cry, cheer, I coulda stood up and thrown punches it was hell to keep it bottled up.

9/10 for me
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jun 13, 2015, 08:12:26 PM
Quote from: Wrecktangle on Jun 13, 2015, 07:08:52 PM
Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 13, 2015, 06:37:30 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Jun 13, 2015, 05:46:13 PM
Hubbs always comes into major popular movie threads and finds ways to downplay them like he did with Mad Max 4, Avengers 2, Godzilla 2014 and a few others in the past from what I can remember. Good marketing, good word of mouth and the first JW movie in almost 15 years is the reason why the movie is going to have a major box office opening weekend.

I'm serious, even Jeremy Jahns wasn't overly impressed and that's saying something.

Majority of the reviews say otherwise. I like Jahns, usually, but sometimes he's way off the mark. JW is defs a blu ray buy.

Agreed. I mostly like Jahns, but his review of JW was shit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 13, 2015, 08:39:15 PM
concept art from Jurassic World

http://io9.com/concept-art-from-jurassic-world-shows-off-isla-nublars-1711138826 (http://io9.com/concept-art-from-jurassic-world-shows-off-isla-nublars-1711138826)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 13, 2015, 08:44:29 PM
My second favorite Jurassic Park film. This plays very much like another Crichton story, WESTWORLD and that's exactly what I was hoping for. A futuristic, fully functioning park where things go off rails and innocent people killed in the process.

The I-Rex felt VERY dangerous. It couldn't manage to chase down a couple kids, but other than that it was quite impressive and a great 'villain.'

Owen was indeed a badass. It's like they boiled down the best elements of Grant, Malcolm, and Muldoon and fused them into Indiana Jones for good measure. Some of his lines were horrible but Pratt has a way of making cheesy lines work, even iconic. Reminds me of Bruce Campbell in that way. His relationship with the Raptors was well handled.

Claire wasn't much of a character but wow did BDH looked great. Great eyes. Great emotion. Her wardrobe slowly deteriorating over the course of the film reflected the deterioration of her bureaucratic, professional front. (She didn't loose her heels though and damned if it didn't slow her down one bit!) Props to Trevorrow for knowing how to capture that light reflecting off her sweaty skin. Nice touch to an already entertaining film. ;)

I surprisingly really dug the Lowery character. He symbolizes all the grown ups in the audience who loved Jurassic Park back in early 90s. That moment he had at the end when his co-worker Vivian was evacuating the control room.  :laugh:

Overall I'm very pleased with the film. More entertaining than Age of Ultron. Pound for pound better than last summers Godzilla, but not quite enough to dethrone Pacific Rim as the most recent out-of-nowhere summer round house kick to the face.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 13, 2015, 08:45:23 PM
Quote from: bloodinthemud on Jun 13, 2015, 02:53:13 AM
Quote from: Crazy Shrimp on Jun 12, 2015, 10:32:16 PM
Indominus Rex was like a Carcharodontosaurid with extra long arms...

but exactly what are the similarities with Rex? was the strength of her jaws? or the power of the roar?

No, it was the role it played in the plot of the movie. Big dinosaur breaks out, wreaks havoc. T Rex has already done that.

The new features are either superficial in comparison to the T rex or were only featured once and discarded rendering them relatively pointless.

Spoiler
example, the camouflage. It's shown once, then never seen again. When it is used. It's not used to great effect on screen. It just appears, and attacks. T Rex did that in JP when it burst through the bushes and chased the Jeep. The I Rex's camouflage is never seen again
[close]

I'm a Dinosaur fan, I just was curious about the T.Rex features present in I.Rex (because it is a hybrid, which reflects different features and characteristics of dinosaurs and other animals). But yaeh. The animal plays a similar role as antagonist.

BTW!
Spoiler

An animatronic T. rex would have been the ideal, to make it look more real, and less cartoonish and fake.
[close]

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 13, 2015, 09:02:28 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 13, 2015, 08:32:53 AM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Jun 13, 2015, 06:26:25 AM
Too bad the Pteranodons from the ending of Jurassic Park III where never mention ever again. We never knew what happen after wards.

One of the viral sites for JW actually tied into that. It mentions that Hoskins got the security job at the park because his team was responsible for wiping them out.

You don't need to thank me. ;D

Glad you enjoyed it DOOM!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Jun 13, 2015, 09:11:24 PM
Just got back. Tons of fun, clearly loves dinosaurs, made me care about raptors, knows how awesome the T-rex is. What's not to like?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jun 13, 2015, 09:16:46 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 13, 2015, 08:32:53 AM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Jun 13, 2015, 06:26:25 AM
Too bad the Pteranodons from the ending of Jurassic Park III where never mention ever again. We never knew what happen after wards.

One of the viral sites for JW actually tied into that. It mentions that Hoskins got the security job at the park because his team was responsible for wiping them out.

That's cool. I guess the events of Lost World: JW and JP3 still happen, but the film just ignores it. It's like how Predator 2 is to Predators.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 13, 2015, 09:26:58 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Jun 13, 2015, 09:16:46 PM
That's cool. I guess the events of Lost World: JW and JP3 still happen, but the film just ignores it.

The subtle links to the other sequels are there. Malcolm's book (which is mentioned in 3), Lost World theme playing during climax, and the parasaurolophus looking/sounding like they do from TLW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 13, 2015, 09:50:50 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 13, 2015, 09:02:28 PM
Glad you enjoyed it DOOM!

I knew I would. I wasn't sure how much though. I wonder where the sequel will go. Think it'll be centred on bringing Wu in?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jun 13, 2015, 10:15:20 PM
I wish the T-Rex running on the lose in  San Diego was reference since JP3 and JW act like that it never happened.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 13, 2015, 10:41:39 PM
Did they make any  ;) jokes to this in JW?

(https://40.media.tumblr.com/e0e8989cdb930fb7b53f45fa1962bb27/tumblr_mz4ivsZsOB1r07kupo1_500.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 13, 2015, 10:48:42 PM
Ever wondered what a crossover between Doctor Who and Jurassic Park would look like? Something like this I'd imagine.
http://instagram.com/p/34vPkHlEgz/

Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Jun 13, 2015, 10:15:20 PM
I wish the T-Rex running on the lose in  San Diego was reference since JP3 and JW act like that it never happened.

It's mentioned explicitly by Alan Grant in his speech during the Q&A: "Or the incident in San Diego, which I did not witness."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 13, 2015, 10:49:10 PM
http://time.com/3920390/chris-pratt-jurassic-world-sequel/

Sequel time. Maybe they'll finally go with the god damn virus plot from the books.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jun 13, 2015, 10:51:20 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 13, 2015, 10:48:42 PM

It's mentioned explicitly by Alan Grant in his speech during the Q&A: "Or the incident in San Diego, which I did not witness."

I forgot about that. It would be funny in JW if they where like "If the Indominus rex got on the lose in the main park, it will be like San Diego all over again!".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 13, 2015, 11:01:43 PM
I'm disappointed too that Suchomimus wasn't in the film. I remember seeing the name on the dinosaur list.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Jun 13, 2015, 11:17:29 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 13, 2015, 09:50:50 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 13, 2015, 09:02:28 PM
Glad you enjoyed it DOOM!

I knew I would. I wasn't sure how much though. I wonder where the sequel will go. Think it'll be centred on bringing Wu in?

The sequel will be set in the court room, and a new dinosaur, philosiraptor, will be introduced to fight for cloned dinosaur's rights

That or dinosaurs thrive and outbreed humans becoming the dominant species leadig to a film set in the future during the dinocalypse
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 13, 2015, 11:36:28 PM
Top Single Days
1.   Harry Potter / Deathly Hallows (P2)   $91,071,119
2.   Avengers: Age of Ultron   $84,424,532
3.   Jurassic World   $82,800,000
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Jun 14, 2015, 12:49:36 AM
Another so so review, I don't get it  :o

'a standard monster movie'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASBbI-xEi3A
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Jun 14, 2015, 12:53:26 AM
remove the music an the logos and it's a live action version of a dinosaur cartoon. Entertaining, fun, but not a jurassic park movie
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HappyAlien on Jun 14, 2015, 01:12:08 AM
One of the things that really sets Jaws apart from the Jurassic park films is that back then Spielberg was not afraid to kill off a kid and even in the sequels teenagers were killed. One thing the Jurassic Park films lack is that you never feel that the kids are in any actual danger so most scenes with them lack something because you know they are not going to be killed or even really injured.

There is a lot of hate on this forum for this film but i found it a lot more enjoyable than the two sequels its a bit like Scream 4 which i thought was far better than Scream 2 and 3 but not quite as good as the original.

I didn't worry about the plot holes or scientific inaccuracy ( i like how Woo explained they made the dinosaurs to look what people expected dinosaurs to look like) and just enjoyed the film. This year has been pretty average for films unlike 2012 and 2014 and i really haven't enjoyed  a film this year as much with maybe the exceptions of Run All Night, It Follows and maybe Mad Max.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 14, 2015, 01:21:59 AM
I have to wait six more months for Star Wars now. I hope I can make it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Spidey3121 on Jun 14, 2015, 01:25:49 AM
Saw it Thursday night. I found it to entertaining. Definitely good, but certainly fell short of great. It delivered on action, but not scares. Also, the set-up is incredibly paint-by-numbers. I thought Pratt was awesome. Several supporting characters were as well. Others less so. I felt however that it suffered from plot redundancies, beyond the basic premise of dinosaurs running wild. Though enjoyable, I feel inclined to lump it in w/ Lost Word & III. The more interesting plot elements were oft tossed aside to play hide & seek w/ the InDominus Res. There's the original, which is truly spectacular, & three suitable sequels, ranging from mediocre to good. I reckon it does represent an improvement over III however.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PVTDukeMorrison on Jun 14, 2015, 03:38:31 AM
So one thing I realized about the ending is that
Spoiler
when Blue is running in to save the rex it plays a quick part of TLW theme. This scene just became better a lot better for me.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Twin Drive Sigma Aquarion on Jun 14, 2015, 03:45:27 AM
I'll be seeing it tomorrow, I even got my JP t-short for the occasion. Screw the critics, I liked all three movies equally. 8) Pic not related, but it has a velociraptor anyway.
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs13.postimg.org%2Fzdto76p8n%2F1434248133429.png&hash=ae84b096c8acfbf12297f3e07bb7dd57b433fe30)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 14, 2015, 04:09:57 AM
(https://scontent-atl1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xft1/v/t1.0-9/11391555_10204251424633791_7382554900610019465_n.jpg?oh=dc918678f8cff3901fa273de57d9248e&oe=56289D44)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Jun 14, 2015, 04:33:49 AM
delete it. now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 14, 2015, 05:36:58 AM
Quote from: bloodinthemud on Jun 14, 2015, 04:33:49 AM
delete it. now.

Yes i agree
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: severen76 on Jun 14, 2015, 08:17:13 AM
I saw it the other day and had a lot of fun with it during the second and third acts. It's not as good as the first, but I think it's just about at the same level as The Lost World.

Pratt was great, and it has some good characters in it. But Vincent D'Onfrio's character is really under-cooked, especially as he's supposed to be the main antagonist.

Did anyone else find some of the deaths in this really dark?
Spoiler
I'm mainly thinking of the nanny and the security guard after I-Rex breaks out of the enclosure
[close]
.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 14, 2015, 12:29:16 PM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 13, 2015, 10:49:10 PM
Sequel time.

Money wise you KNOW it's going to happen. But story wise I CAN'T see the setting being in another park environment. I think they are going to chase this "Training Dinosaurs for War" thing. That is how Owen will be involved ... perhaps in a counter program. Dinosaurs for defense against rogue terrorist bred hybrid dinosaurs or something.

And since ...

Spoiler
... Wu is still alive and is now known to have a dark streak ... the stage is set for more hybrid dinosaurs. Each more outlandish than the next.
[close]

Maybe one more trip to Site B ... but then it's Jurassic War.

Quote from: severen76 on Jun 14, 2015, 08:17:13 AM
Did anyone else find some of the deaths in this really dark?
Spoiler
I'm mainly thinking of the nanny and the security guard after I-Rex breaks out of the enclosure
[close]
.

Yes. Delightfully so.

Spoiler
Both of those were great deaths. I knew the out of shape security guard was doomed when we saw him sitting, defeated, in front of the car. Great little exchange of looks with Pratt. Right before ... chomp.

The Nanny scene was all like "Doh! Snatched up by Pteranodon! Wait! It dropped her! Oh shit! She's falling from really high up! She's going to totally hit the pavement! Whew! Landed in the water! WAIT! That's the Mosasaurus's water! Wait for it ... wait for it ... DOH! Pteranodon's got her again! Oh shit it's actually biting her and lifting her! Brutal! OH SHIT Mosasaurus!! It'll eat the Pteranodon and the Nanny will swim to safety! Nope! She got swallowed too."  :laugh:
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dovahkiin on Jun 14, 2015, 02:12:58 PM
I'm sick of people saying dumb shit like "It wasn't a Jurassic Park movie" like their opinion matters so much more than anyone else's.

It had awesome action, some brutal dinosaur kills and some damn suspenseful moments.

This is a Jurassic Park movie in every way to me and I don't give a damn what anyone says.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: viendammage on Jun 14, 2015, 02:19:52 PM
Any thoughts on what could have been James Cameron's version? Spielberg beat him to the rights and made more of a family film while JC said he would made a nastier version, like Aliens but with dinosaurs. A rumor says Arnold would have been Grant, Bill Paxton as Malcolm then Charlton Heston as Hammond. Would have been interesting to say the least.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jun 14, 2015, 02:35:46 PM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Jun 14, 2015, 02:12:58 PMIt had awesome action, some brutal dinosaur kills and some damn suspenseful moments.

I thought the action was pretty forgettable. Most of it felt like worse versions of scenes already done in the earlier films, until it just turned into dinos fighting dinos like an American Godzilla film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 14, 2015, 02:42:53 PM
Exhibitor Relations @ERCboxoffice
BOOM! JURASSIC WORLD knocked it out of the park with $204.5M this weekend--2nd best opening of all-time!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jun 14, 2015, 02:56:25 PM
I'm not sure what they will do for a sequel? What I like about JW is that it had the feeling of the Jurassic Park to it and returning back to the park is why I love the movie. The second JP movie still had the feeling of the first movie while the third movie didn't. For a sequel, I would like to see them do more new ideas then rehashing the last movies.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Spidey3121 on Jun 14, 2015, 03:09:06 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Jun 14, 2015, 02:42:53 PM
Exhibitor Relations @ERCboxoffice
BOOM! JURASSIC WORLD knocked it out of the park with $204.5M this weekend--2nd best opening of all-time!

This shocks me, honestly. I knew anticipation had reached fever pitch, & people were anticipating a $100+ million debut, but for it to double up is absolutely insane. When actuals come in, it could be #1, something I don't think anyone on the face of the planet expected.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bender1988 on Jun 14, 2015, 03:14:16 PM
Regarding the ending/final fight
Spoiler
I really dislike the ending,fight with raptors was cool, fight with t rex was cool, and when I-rex got her ass kicked, she get up-and i was thinking"now the serious stuff happens" and then the oversized swimming dino gets her-really anty climactic
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jun 14, 2015, 03:38:56 PM
http://www.theladbible.com/articles/this-jurassic-world-theory-suggests-that-chris-pratt-s-character-was-in-the-first-film

What do you guys think?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gazz on Jun 14, 2015, 04:00:54 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Jun 14, 2015, 03:38:56 PM
http://www.theladbible.com/articles/this-jurassic-world-theory-suggests-that-chris-pratt-s-character-was-in-the-first-film

What do you guys think?

Some people have too much time on their hands.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Darkness on Jun 14, 2015, 04:27:49 PM
Some box office updates: http://www.comingsoon.net/movies/news/450047-jurassic-world-runs-rampant-with-511-8-million-at-the-global-box-office#/slide/1

Estimated $204.6 million domestic opening with $511.8 million globally in just four days.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 14, 2015, 04:46:14 PM
Quote from: viendammage on Jun 14, 2015, 02:19:52 PM
Any thoughts on what could have been James Cameron's version? Spielberg beat him to the rights and made more of a family film while JC said he would made a nastier version, like Aliens but with dinosaurs.

Well several rival studios were bidding for the rights, each with their associated prestige director attached; James Cameron was 20th Century Fox's, I think Tim Burton was another candidate.

Cameron's said his version would have been darker and nastier, so I would imagine it'd be closer in feel to the book (which also is darker and pretty damn grisly).
I think Crichton and Cameron would have made a very interesting pairing, they're both extraordinarily technically-minded and combine creativity with heavy research, and seem to have similar sensibilities. Always thought it's a huge shame they never had the opportunity to work together.

That said, as much as I love the book, and would have liked to have seen that version, it's hard to imagine anyone doing a better job than Spielberg's film. Maybe we'd have been better off with a Lost World developed by Cameron, but I wouldn't wish away the Jurassic Park we got.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 14, 2015, 05:00:04 PM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Jun 14, 2015, 02:12:58 PM
I'm sick of people saying dumb shit like "It wasn't a Jurassic Park movie" like their opinion matters so much more than anyone else's.

It had awesome action, some brutal dinosaur kills and some damn suspenseful moments.

This is a Jurassic Park movie in every way to me and I don't give a damn what anyone says.

those are harsh words mate. i watched it again today, i say the first 40-50 minutes are chilling and awesome, and after the I-Rex escape what happens with the ACU and all the weaponize stuff, civil person
Spoiler
Masrani the boss, sure
[close]
going to the battle smiling like a badass C movie character, uninstresting side characters,
Spoiler
T-rex  waiting in the door of his gigantic padock all day to come out to fight(?), talking dinos, throwing every dino in one scene for the final, also the Mosasaur is happened to be in the exact same spot where the dino fight is, and yeah he is eating for the 4th time on that day
[close]
...its just ridicilous, like the writers, producer, director only had 10 minutes to come up with a story and they were all drunk while writing it down. altough in the first 50 minutes there are also weird shit going on, already the weaponizing of dinos, plus the older kid. is he gay or is he just a duchebag or i dunno what was that girl starings all about, also  in the beginning her girlfriend say "i love you" and he says just "bye". it was weird man, why would you put this in your movie at all if you never exploit it?

still cant rate i above 5/10 personally, i rather watch Lost World and JP3 as sequels with all the dumb and unintresting characters in them than this madness


btw keep up doing your gameplay vids :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Twin Drive Sigma Aquarion on Jun 14, 2015, 05:00:23 PM
Just got back from seeing it, I want to say it is just as fantastic as the first three movies if not for
Spoiler
FRIGGIN MOSASAURUS CUTTING INTO THE FINAL BATTLE AND EATING INDOMINUS REX ARE YOU FRIGGIN KIDDING ME!? Now that I think of it how the hell did they get DNA for an aquatic reptile? Pretty sure you're not going to find mosquitoes trapped in amber at the bottom of the ocean. Plus, didn't this creature already three previous times that same day? Is it a diabetic?
[close]
I did reduce X-Men Origins a point for simply screwing up Deadpool, I am half tempted to do the same thing here.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Jun 14, 2015, 05:15:19 PM
There's a new king in town.

"Jurassic World" opened to a staggering $511.8 million worldwide, the highest global bow of all time. It marks the first time a film has ever grossed more than $500 million in a single weekend.

The dinosaur thriller is the top-ranking film from sea to shining sea, after opening in first place in North America and across all 66 international territories where it debuted.

http://variety.com/2015/film/news/jurassic-world-global-box-office-record-1201519430/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 14, 2015, 05:49:54 PM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on Jun 14, 2015, 05:15:19 PM
There's a new king in town.

"Jurassic World" opened to a staggering $511.8 million worldwide, the highest global bow of all time. It marks the first time a film has ever grossed more than $500 million in a single weekend.

The dinosaur thriller is the top-ranking film from sea to shining sea, after opening in first place in North America and across all 66 international territories where it debuted.

http://variety.com/2015/film/news/jurassic-world-global-box-office-record-1201519430/

Yippee! we are going to have more Dinosaurs 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Keg on Jun 14, 2015, 05:59:54 PM
Wow. And Sunday isnt even over yet. That is HUGE. Just got back from seeing it. Really enjoyed it. Seemed to plod on too much and was a bit by the books and a bit of run of the mill with a feeling of "bah ive seen all this already" but the last half hour more than makes for it. Finally a Jurassic Park movie where you actually get to see raptors in an action scene running at full speed. Ever since that Muldoon line about them getting up to cheetah speeds out in the open, ive wanted to actually see that on film. So far theres just been one short shot in JP3 where they run out into the herd and that was it.

I was worried the whole weaponizing the raptors thing would have been stupid but its not a big part of the story and once things go to shit its pretty much forgotten about. This film has the best raptor stuff in it since the first film.

Spoiler
I think they missed a trick with this one a bit though. It was alot smaller scale than what I expected. By that I mean its not the whole park with all the dinosaurs on the loose like I expected. Kinda made it more hard to believe though, that the two people who end up stranded and in danger happen to be the nephews of the park manager. Ahh well. But yeah I did expect utter chaos on a scale we havent yet seen but its just one sequence with the flying dinosaurs (sorry dont know the names). I suppose it wouldn't make any sense and they'd have to come up with some ridiculous explanation as to how they all manage to get. Ever read a story about one animal escaping from a zoo enclosure that leads to pretty much every animal there also getting free? Yeah me neither. Also releasing the T Rex as a plan to stop the I Rex? What the f**k kinda dumbass idea is that. Yep now youve got two massive bastards trying to kill you. Ahh well so f**k we got a cool dino fight out of it which actually lasts longer than 20 seconds like in JP3. 
[close]

Its definately a better film than the third and I'd put it about on par with The Lost World. Still cant touch the original but I doubt any sequel to JP ever will. Not even sure what they could do for a sequel after this. Two films about a park going tits up, the lost world made sense but that wouldn't happen again and I doubt they'd do a simple stranded scenario again either. But based on how well this has already done I'd say its nailed on we'll get another one somehow in the next 5 years. Theyre not gonna wait another 14 years this time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 14, 2015, 06:58:22 PM
The deaths were amazing. Jurassic Park could easily benefit from a darker tone.
Spoiler
I liked the blood hitting the wall in the lab when one of the raptors kills Hoskins.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Keg on Jun 14, 2015, 07:47:16 PM
Spoiler
That was really creepy the way the raptor just clamped down on his whole arm. Probably my favourite moment in the film.
[close]

I watched the original films for the first time in a few years last week and it struck me how menacing and bleak The Lost World is compared to the first and third films. I dont have a problem with that (im one of the few who really likes Alien 3 and thinks the ending is actually uplifting coz its Ripley basically saying f**k YOU im going out on my own terms and im ending this nightmare) but it did make me think that might be one of the reasons alot of people dont like The Lost World. Suppose Spielbergs done that before with Temple Of Doom.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jun 14, 2015, 07:49:43 PM
I don't really get everyone raving about the dino fight. I thought that was by far the lamest bit of the film. It just turned into a Godzilla movie, with all the different monsters duking it out.

Quote from: Keg on Jun 14, 2015, 07:47:16 PMI watched the original films for the first time in a few years last week and it struck me how menacing and bleak The Lost World is compared to the first and third films.

It's by far the darkest. Almost certainly the most violent too, or at least the violence in it is more disturbing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Jun 14, 2015, 08:00:24 PM
I still don't get it, biggest surprise in years, I thought this was gonna tank judging by reactions to the trailer. The weird thing is I'm still seeing average reviews :o I've not really seen any outstanding reviews of the movie (apart from some on here).

This is like...Terminator Genisys becoming a massive massive hit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 14, 2015, 08:02:01 PM
Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 14, 2015, 08:00:24 PM
I still don't get it, biggest surprise in years, I thought this was gonna tank judging by reactions to the trailer. The weird thing is I'm still seeing average reviews :o I've not really seen any outstanding reviews of the movie (apart from some on here).

This is like...Terminator Genisys becoming a massive massive hit.

Chris Pratt has star power.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 14, 2015, 08:02:24 PM
Thinking back there were some brutal deaths. The movie definitely earned that PG-13.

Spoiler
The one where the iRex picks up and throws the guard into the tree branch was "backbreaktakingly" unexpected. They showed part of it in the trailer but when I saw him hit the tree branch and heard I cringed. It was as brutal as the out of shape guy being eaten.
[close]

There are tons of great moments in the film that I want to see again in Imax while I have the chance. However the thing that I really enjoyed was the excitement and joy of the fans. I was having a ball waiting to see this. They had tons of cosplayers and even the picture taking with the jeep. Bobba fet battling a guy in the raptor suit was awesome and hilarious at the same time. A lot of people put effort into making this fun. I also noticed on opening night that it was mostly 30+ year olds at the movie. A lot of middle aged people, I suppose people 22 years ago who you would not expect to go to Jurassic park on opening night was waiting in line to see this. It was awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TheBATMAN on Jun 14, 2015, 08:04:12 PM
Why is it such a surprise? Kids will love it, Chris Pratt is the latest thing and it's mindless, mindless fun. It was always going to be successful.

But at its core it is a very, very average movie. Lacks any kind of soul. Forgettable characters too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Jun 14, 2015, 08:15:24 PM
Quote from: TheBATMAN on Jun 14, 2015, 08:04:12 PM
Why is it such a surprise? Kids will love it, Chris Pratt is the latest thing and it's mindless, mindless fun. It was always going to be successful.

But at its core it is a very, very average movie. Lacks any kind of soul. Forgettable characters too.

Well like I said, the reactions to the trailer were poor, it looked very jokey with Raptors being trained like pets, a new dino that is basically a monster because its not officially a real dino etc...



Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Keg on Jun 14, 2015, 08:35:29 PM
I will say this about Chris Pratt. When I first heard they were seriously considering recasting Indiana Jones to make more films I thought it was a horrible idea. I just couldn't see anybody pulling off Indy like Harrison Ford. After seeing this im kinda hoping the rumors are true and Pratt gets the gig. I can actually see him doing a good job of it. I know its not a great comparison because hes a character of few words anyway but it worked for Mad Max recently and people have accepted different actors playing Bond. Cant be any worse than Crystal Skull and if it does turn out shit i'll just not watch it and stick with the originals. Indiana Jones is one of my favourite film series so if we got another decent film out of it that would possibly leas to a few more i'd be game for that. Anything to hear that Raiders March booming in a cinema again. Anyway sorry got side tracked with the wrong film here haha. But yeah I thought Pratt was good in this. Everyone worried too much he would be too goofy after Parks and Rec and Guardians. Thats why they call it "acting". He was probably  the most straight laced, sensible character in the film actually. The guys in the control room and the owner of the park who flies the helicopter where the comic relief.

About the trailers too. Very misleading in a bad way. I actually think the film is much better than what the trailers made it look. I'd rate JP a 9/10, TLW a 7/10, JP3 a 5/10 and this a 6.5/10.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Twin Drive Sigma Aquarion on Jun 14, 2015, 08:36:46 PM
Hey guys remember when Cracked.com said CGI for this movie was used poorly?

http://www.cracked.com/blog/6-reasons-expensive-films-end-up-with-crappy-special-effects/

After getting 500 million dollars in two days how much do you guys want to bet that they are kicking themselves for writing this article? :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jun 14, 2015, 08:42:02 PM
Quote from: Twin Drive Sigma Aquarion on Jun 14, 2015, 08:36:46 PMAfter getting 500 million dollars in two days how much do you guys want to bet that they are kicking themselves for writing this article? :laugh:

Just because the film made money, that doesn't mean the CGI reached new heights of special effects. Because it didn't.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Jun 14, 2015, 08:42:09 PM
They talk about JW first.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4W5DUKMBIQ
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Njm1983 on Jun 14, 2015, 08:50:46 PM
At this point, I feel like the lack of understanding about the movie being successful coming from the folks who didn't like it, just means that they don't understand people very well.

The movie is full of parallels to the original. It is fun to watch dinosaurs. We all knew shit was gonna hit the fan. Even though the characters were seemingly shallow I had no problem identifying with many of them.

There were even some things I liked a whole lot
Spoiler
John Hammond was portrayed as a capitalist in jp. But he also had that human side to him when things went wrong. I liked how masrani went right to work and refused actions that were against his beliefs and potentially could have put others in harm. I also liked seeing him take an active role in trying to stop the I rex by flying the helicopter. I felt bad for him when he crashed and burned. His cockiness was understandable since the I Rex doesn't fly he probably felt untouchable
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Jun 14, 2015, 09:01:22 PM
I haven't seen it but I must ask.

How is this better than the previous JP sequels when...

The plot is just as ludicrous, if not more so.
This new movie has a made-up dinosaur so technically its just a monster and not a real dinosaur.
They train raptors which unsurprisingly turn on the people that trained them (so I've read). Movie cliche 101.
The CGI is not much better.
The kids are, so I've read, annoying and pointless.
The new made-up dino is called an I-Rex (iphone, get it? for the younger generation)  -_-



Admittedly like I said, I haven't seen it, I'm playing devils advocate. But I don't get how this differs from the previous films.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 14, 2015, 09:19:18 PM
Just thinking of one scene that didn't make the final cut:

Spoiler
Claire didn't cover herself in dino droppings

end of this tv spot

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfIC1zn_lis

[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Jun 14, 2015, 09:20:16 PM
Quote from: TheBATMAN on Jun 14, 2015, 08:04:12 PM
Why is it such a surprise? Kids will love it, Chris Pratt is the latest thing and it's mindless, mindless fun. It was always going to be successful.

But at its core it is a very, very average movie. Lacks any kind of soul. Forgettable characters too.
woah thats too far. i thought it had plenty soul.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Jun 14, 2015, 09:39:13 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Jun 14, 2015, 09:19:18 PM
Just thinking of one scene that didn't make the final cut:

Spoiler
Claire didn't cover herself in dino droppings

end of this tv spot

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfIC1zn_lis

[close]

Totally forgot about that, maybe for an extended cut? Although I remember the original JP trailers also having unused footage like Ellie grabbing the big leaf during the drive to the Brachosaurus site.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TheBATMAN on Jun 14, 2015, 09:57:46 PM
Quote from: frenchfries on Jun 14, 2015, 09:20:16 PM
Quote from: TheBATMAN on Jun 14, 2015, 08:04:12 PM
Why is it such a surprise? Kids will love it, Chris Pratt is the latest thing and it's mindless, mindless fun. It was always going to be successful.

But at its core it is a very, very average movie. Lacks any kind of soul. Forgettable characters too.
woah thats too far. i thought it had plenty soul.

Examples?

There's no soul because the characters are all flat as a pancake. You know before the movie starts exactly who will live and who will die, hence why it was pointless to put so much emphasis on the two kids, neither of which had half a personality between them.

The same with the adults. There's no development with any of them. I couldn't have cared less what happens to any of them, and therefore there's no reason to care about what happens in the film as a whole.

The  dinosaurs too. Impressive as the CGI and effects are, they just don't look real. Case in point is the t-Rex itself. How is that acceptable when literally the same creature looks more realistic in an incarnation from 22 years ago?

Don't get me wrong. I can see this film will be a huge success, make a shit-ton of money and break all kinds of records, it's easy to see why. But there's no hiding the fact that deep down it's a poor movie. The script is all over the place, and when the script isn't right, no amounts of limitless budget and impressive effects can hide that. - Look at Prometheus.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 14, 2015, 10:31:51 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 14, 2015, 12:29:16 PM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 13, 2015, 10:49:10 PM
Sequel time.

Money wise you KNOW it's going to happen. But story wise I CAN'T see the setting being in another park environment. I think they are going to chase this "Training Dinosaurs for War" thing. That is how Owen will be involved ... perhaps in a counter program. Dinosaurs for defense against rogue terrorist bred hybrid dinosaurs or something.

And since ...

Spoiler
... Wu is still alive and is now known to have a dark streak ... the stage is set for more hybrid dinosaurs. Each more outlandish than the next.
[close]

Maybe one more trip to Site B ... but then it's Jurassic War.

Quote from: severen76 on Jun 14, 2015, 08:17:13 AM
Did anyone else find some of the deaths in this really dark?
Spoiler
I'm mainly thinking of the nanny and the security guard after I-Rex breaks out of the enclosure
[close]
.

Yes. Delightfully so.

Spoiler
Both of those were great deaths. I knew the out of shape security guard was doomed when we saw him sitting, defeated, in front of the car. Great little exchange of looks with Pratt. Right before ... chomp.

The Nanny scene was all like "Doh! Snatched up by Pteranodon! Wait! It dropped her! Oh shit! She's falling from really high up! She's going to totally hit the pavement! Whew! Landed in the water! WAIT! That's the Mosasaurus's water! Wait for it ... wait for it ... DOH! Pteranodon's got her again! Oh shit it's actually biting her and lifting her! Brutal! OH SHIT Mosasaurus!! It'll eat the Pteranodon and the Nanny will swim to safety! Nope! She got swallowed too."  :laugh:
[close]

You know, I always thought I knew the direction they'd take with the franchise after this moveie. Hell I thought it would happen near the end of it.

I think "Jurassic World" is a pun. Not just the name of the park, but that the animals would escape and populate the world. And they'd have to start dealing with this. It's syfy b movie material, but I think that's what's happening.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jun 14, 2015, 10:36:17 PM
Very surprise with the 200 million opening weekend. Not even Godzilla 2014 with a similar review rating on the web made that much. I think good marketing and the first JP movie in almost 15 years help this movie. Since it been so long since we had a new movie, it help build up interested in the last decade. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 14, 2015, 10:37:48 PM
Quote from: szkoki on Jun 14, 2015, 05:00:04 PM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Jun 14, 2015, 02:12:58 PM
I'm sick of people saying dumb shit like "It wasn't a Jurassic Park movie" like their opinion matters so much more than anyone else's.

It had awesome action, some brutal dinosaur kills and some damn suspenseful moments.

This is a Jurassic Park movie in every way to me and I don't give a damn what anyone says.

those are harsh words mate. i watched it again today, i say the first 40-50 minutes are chilling and awesome, and after the I-Rex escape what happens with the ACU and all the weaponize stuff, civil person
Spoiler
Masrani the boss, sure
[close]
going to the battle smiling like a badass C movie character, uninstresting side characters,
Spoiler
T-rex  waiting in the door of his gigantic padock all day to come out to fight(?), talking dinos, throwing every dino in one scene for the final, also the Mosasaur is happened to be in the exact same spot where the dino fight is, and yeah he is eating for the 4th time on that day
[close]
...its just ridicilous, like the writers, producer, director only had 10 minutes to come up with a story and they were all drunk while writing it down. altough in the first 50 minutes there are also weird shit going on, already the weaponizing of dinos, plus the older kid. is he gay or is he just a duchebag or i dunno what was that girl starings all about, also  in the beginning her girlfriend say "i love you" and he says just "bye". it was weird man, why would you put this in your movie at all if you never exploit it?

still cant rate i above 5/10 personally, i rather watch Lost World and JP3 as sequels with all the dumb and unintresting characters in them than this madness


btw keep up doing your gameplay vids :)

Man none of those things are hard to explain.

Spoiler
T Rex was probably awake and chilling, with all the chaos it probably hears and feels. The door starts unlocking very loudly. Why wouldn't it go see what the noise is?

Talking dinos? Is this new or something?

Although the teamup is admittedly a bit ridiculous, what's wrong with having all these dinosaurs there? I mean it made sense. The pieces were set up.

The Mosasaur obviously can hear and/or feel all the commotion going on right next to it's enclosure. And I get the feeling that it just wants to hunt. Notnecessarily eat. And it saw it's opportunity. Not hard to believe at all.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 14, 2015, 10:45:40 PM
Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 14, 2015, 09:01:22 PM
I haven't seen it but I must ask.

How is this better than the previous JP sequels when...

The plot is just as ludicrous, if not more so.
This new movie has a made-up dinosaur so technically its just a monster and not a real dinosaur.
They train raptors which unsurprisingly turn on the people that trained them (so I've read). Movie cliche 101.
The CGI is not much better.
The kids are, so I've read, annoying and pointless.
The new made-up dino is called an I-Rex (iphone, get it? for the younger generation)  -_-



Admittedly like I said, I haven't seen it, I'm playing devils advocate. But I don't get how this differs from the previous films.

Why not go see it and make up your own mind?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gazz on Jun 14, 2015, 11:01:02 PM
Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 14, 2015, 09:01:22 PM
I haven't seen it but I must ask.

How is this better than the previous JP sequels when...

The plot is just as ludicrous, if not more so.
This new movie has a made-up dinosaur so technically its just a monster and not a real dinosaur.
They train raptors which unsurprisingly turn on the people that trained them (so I've read). Movie cliche 101.
The CGI is not much better.
The kids are, so I've read, annoying and pointless.
The new made-up dino is called an I-Rex (iphone, get it? for the younger generation)  -_-



Admittedly like I said, I haven't seen it, I'm playing devils advocate. But I don't get how this differs from the previous films.

::)

People might take you more seriously if you didn't often form your opinion of a film long before actually seeing it.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 14, 2015, 11:09:41 PM
Quote from: Gazz on Jun 14, 2015, 11:01:02 PM
Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 14, 2015, 09:01:22 PM
I haven't seen it but I must ask.

How is this better than the previous JP sequels when...

The plot is just as ludicrous, if not more so.
This new movie has a made-up dinosaur so technically its just a monster and not a real dinosaur.
They train raptors which unsurprisingly turn on the people that trained them (so I've read). Movie cliche 101.
The CGI is not much better.
The kids are, so I've read, annoying and pointless.
The new made-up dino is called an I-Rex (iphone, get it? for the younger generation)  -_-



Admittedly like I said, I haven't seen it, I'm playing devils advocate. But I don't get how this differs from the previous films.

::)

People might take you more seriously if you didn't often form your opinion of a film long before actually seeing it.

This.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Jun 14, 2015, 11:25:17 PM
Like I said I'm playing devil's advocate, I'm also curious about the film and your thoughts on it.

I'm also curious because I've read and heard so many average reviews for this movie so I'm very curious, and baffled ;)

Plus, money on the table, sequel title...
JURASSIC PARK: EXTINCTION.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gazz on Jun 14, 2015, 11:39:53 PM
I thought it was average. To quote myself from earlier:

There's a lot of fun in Jurassic World's individual moments and one very neat twist for the raptors and big-bad but the film is strung together by filmmakers and writers who seem to be at odds over the type of film they're making. Director Colin Trevorrow makes the same mistake as Brad Bird did with Tomorrowland in that the final film ends up being the very thing he's criticising. For example, Trevorrow has one of the character's remark how corporate the park is in regards to product placement in a clear nudge-nudge-wink-wink about how corporate modern films have become, yet there are several moments of obvious product placement littered through the film. There are shots that entirely serve to sell a f**king car.

I also think Trevorrow utterly misses the tone of Spielberg's classic. Jurassic Park was about mining excitement out of the wonder of seeing something you've never seen before. World seems to be about drawing excitement from seeing those wonderful things either kill everything in sight or be killed. Sure there's the element of danger about Jurassic Park, and there are some gnarly death scenes, but it rarely comes across as cruel (the exception being the opening kill). World felt cruel to me.

Also, the placement of the Jurassic Park theme bugged me. In Park it's saved for the new guests witnessing a living dinosaur for the first time. It's literally something they have never seen before (nor the audience seen realised in such a realistic way before). It's a moment of absolute wonder. With World it's used for a view of the parks busy main street, which very much resembles something of an exotic Disney World. It's the type of view seen on multiple adverts for theme parks. There's nothing wondrous about it at all. It's corporate and ultimately soulless. Fell very flat for me.

I liked the stuff with the Raptors, though I can see the execution of them bugging a lot of fans. It's certainly a lot better than JP3 and despite my above issues there is some fun to be had over the various exciting set pieces. It just pales in comparison to the original and even The Lost World in my opinion. However, you may not have any of these issues or personally find they hold any weight after having actually watched the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 14, 2015, 11:46:01 PM
Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 14, 2015, 11:25:17 PM
Like I said I'm playing devil's advocate, I'm also curious about the film and your thoughts on it.

I'm also curious because I've read and heard so many average reviews for this movie so I'm very curious, and baffled ;)

Plus, money on the table, sequel title...
JURASSIC PARK: EXTINCTION.

See it first, then come and debate it. You'd be amazed at how much your opinion can change.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/box-office-jurassic-world-stomps-802370

QuoteThe $150 million tentpole, bestowed with an A CinemaScore, proves that dinosaurs are every bit as potent as superheroes: Jurassic World's estimated weekend bests the $191.3 million launch of sequel Avengers: Age of Ultron last month to bite off the No. 2 domestic opening of all time, almost matching the $207.4 million launch of The Avengers in May 2012.

8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Jun 15, 2015, 12:48:26 AM
Quote from: Gazz on Jun 14, 2015, 11:39:53 PM
I thought it was average. To quote myself from earlier:

There's a lot of fun in Jurassic World's individual moments and one very neat twist for the raptors and big-bad but the film is strung together by filmmakers and writers who seem to be at odds over the type of film they're making. Director Colin Trevorrow makes the same mistake as Brad Bird did with Tomorrowland in that the final film ends up being the very thing he's criticising. For example, Trevorrow has one of the character's remark how corporate the park is in regards to product placement in a clear nudge-nudge-wink-wink about how corporate modern films have become, yet there are several moments of obvious product placement littered through the film. There are shots that entirely serve to sell a f**king car.

I also think Trevorrow utterly misses the tone of Spielberg's classic. Jurassic Park was about mining excitement out of the wonder of seeing something you've never seen before. World seems to be about drawing excitement from seeing those wonderful things either kill everything in sight or be killed. Sure there's the element of danger about Jurassic Park, and there are some gnarly death scenes, but it rarely comes across as cruel (the exception being the opening kill). World felt cruel to me.

Also, the placement of the Jurassic Park theme bugged me. In Park it's saved for the new guests witnessing a living dinosaur for the first time. It's literally something they have never seen before (nor the audience seen realised in such a realistic way before). It's a moment of absolute wonder. With World it's used for a view of the parks busy main street, which very much resembles something of an exotic Disney World. It's the type of view seen on multiple adverts for theme parks. There's nothing wondrous about it at all. It's corporate and ultimately soulless. Fell very flat for me.

I liked the stuff with the Raptors, though I can see the execution of them bugging a lot of fans. It's certainly a lot better than JP3 and despite my above issues there is some fun to be had over the various exciting set pieces. It just pales in comparison to the original and even The Lost World in my opinion. However, you may not have any of these issues or personally find they hold any weight after having actually watched the film.

Yep, pretty much what many are saying, average with highlights.

I get the impression this movie has done well initially because its been so long since the last (good) Jurassic Park flick. Then all of a sudden there's a new movie and everybody has gone nostalgia nuts for the franchise...even though the movie is apparently average. Could say the same for Mad Max really. I agree with Screen Junkies: Movie Fights in that we need more time to see if Mad Max actually stands the test of time, to see if it was over-hyped.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gazz on Jun 15, 2015, 12:57:09 AM
Nah. Mad Max is the real deal. But sure it's inevitably going to incur some small backlash as most widely appreciated films do.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HappyAlien on Jun 15, 2015, 01:06:29 AM
Worldwide its made 511 million in it's first four days and that's not even including Sunday's take from the U.S I think. JP3 made only 368 million during its entire run! I think they will cast Pratt as Indiana Jones now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Jun 15, 2015, 01:33:55 AM
Quote from: TheBATMAN on Jun 14, 2015, 09:57:46 PM
Quote from: frenchfries on Jun 14, 2015, 09:20:16 PM
Quote from: TheBATMAN on Jun 14, 2015, 08:04:12 PM
Why is it such a surprise? Kids will love it, Chris Pratt is the latest thing and it's mindless, mindless fun. It was always going to be successful.

But at its core it is a very, very average movie. Lacks any kind of soul. Forgettable characters too.
woah thats too far. i thought it had plenty soul.

Examples?

There's no soul because the characters are all flat as a pancake. You know before the movie starts exactly who will live and who will die, hence why it was pointless to put so much emphasis on the two kids, neither of which had half a personality between them.

The same with the adults. There's no development with any of them. I couldn't have cared less what happens to any of them, and therefore there's no reason to care about what happens in the film as a whole.

The  dinosaurs too. Impressive as the CGI and effects are, they just don't look real. Case in point is the t-Rex itself. How is that acceptable when literally the same creature looks more realistic in an incarnation from 22 years ago?

Don't get me wrong. I can see this film will be a huge success, make a shit-ton of money and break all kinds of records, it's easy to see why. But there's no hiding the fact that deep down it's a poor movie. The script is all over the place, and when the script isn't right, no amounts of limitless budget and impressive effects can hide that. - Look at Prometheus.
It has its flaw sure, all movies do. And i'll agree that the effects need more work in some of daylight scenes, but the original jp also had shoddy effects in some scenes. But the movie having no soul is your opinion and in my opinion i can see plenty of soul. Colin is a big fan of the series and it shows. claire and the older child have character arcs and most of the characters had alot of personilty (masarani and owen)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HappyAlien on Jun 15, 2015, 02:26:29 AM
I think one thing that made me like the film more than a lot of other people was there were a few scenes that reminded me of the Alien and Predator series.

Spoiler
The two scenes with the soldiers POV and people back at HQ watching them get killed and their flat lines reminded me of Aliens and Predator 2 which had very similar scenes. The I-Rex changing colour reminded me of the original Predator, when the kids jumped in the river and then got into the mud I actually thought they were going to use it to hide from the I-Rex as its vision was based on seeing thermal images just like Arnie in the original Predator. Also the Company was just like WY in the Alien series wanting to weaponise the Raptors.
[close]


Also here's a really dumb question I post Youtube  videos to my Facebook all the time and its really easy how do you do it here?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 15, 2015, 03:19:14 AM
Quote from: HappyAlien on Jun 15, 2015, 02:26:29 AM
I think one thing that made me like the film more than a lot of other people was there were a few scenes that reminded me of the Alien and Predator series.

Spoiler
The two scenes with the soldiers POV and people back at HQ watching them get killed and their flat lines reminded me of Aliens and Predator 2 which had very similar scenes. The I-Rex changing colour reminded me of the original Predator, when the kids jumped in the river and then got into the mud I actually thought they were going to use it to hide from the I-Rex as its vision was based on seeing thermal images just like Arnie in the original Predator. Also the Company was just like WY in the Alien series wanting to weaponise the Raptors.
[close]


Also here's a really dumb question I post Youtube  videos to my Facebook all the time and its really easy how do you do it here?
Just post the video link, no need for bbcode but use http and not https.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: razeak on Jun 15, 2015, 03:30:07 AM
I thought it was pretty good overall with a few misteps(show me a movie without some please). I liked Pratt and Howard. She grew over the course of the movie and made her own mark IMO, so all the sexist stuff is overblown. I thought the movie had a lot of heart too. I really felt bad for at least one minor character because that actor had me convinced he was scared shitless. CGI was meh several times but I tend to overlook that stuff unless it's extremely bad. I've already given myself over to suspension of disbelief. I thought Blue, Rexy and I.Rex made total sense. The kids didn't drift into annoying territory for me and I was able to connect with some choices they made since I was an adventurous teenager myself. Vincent's character was well played, but could have used a little better writing. Also Dr. Wu(B.D. Wong was exceptional) explained the point of contention about the dinosaurs appearances rather explicitly. It doesn't really matter whether people thinks it still matters, Wu(and the filmakers) put it to bed. It's their vision. Universal Pictures doesn't have some obligation to show the world feathered dinosaurs. They only have to try to entertain.

T. Rex is supposed to look different according to a few interviews I read this past week. T. Rex has aged and the way they described the look was exactly like another forum member noticed as looking different(I think it was Omegazilla). As for the other dinosaurs, I would assume they gave the artists a certain set of boundaries and let them play around inside that. You know, expression and all that important artistic stuff  ;)  Everything doesn't have to look exactly the same in each flick, especially when it's 22 years after the first one.

I thought it hit one of the hallmarks of sci-fi also. If you go back to the quote from JP about the scientist not questioning if they should and the conversation about the flea circus and illusions, I think Jurassic World really nailed it with showing exactly what the consequences of unfettered genetic manipulation and total faith in technology(trackers, thermal imaging, the response team, Wu) can be on a large scale. The question is how far is too far? At what point do we take a step back and say "Hey this can turn bad really fast, so let's dial it back." I think JW matched the tone of JP here, even if it faltered somewhat on the awe and grandeur of seeing these creatures on screen(which is the curse of being the third sequel in the CGI age).

It touched heavily on respect for nature with Pratt and Howard and D'onofrio also.

8.5/10

JP 9.9/10
LW 8/10
JPIII 7/10
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 15, 2015, 09:00:25 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jun 14, 2015, 10:37:48 PM
Quote from: szkoki on Jun 14, 2015, 05:00:04 PM
Quote from: Dovahkiin on Jun 14, 2015, 02:12:58 PM
I'm sick of people saying dumb shit like "It wasn't a Jurassic Park movie" like their opinion matters so much more than anyone else's.

It had awesome action, some brutal dinosaur kills and some damn suspenseful moments.

This is a Jurassic Park movie in every way to me and I don't give a damn what anyone says.

those are harsh words mate. i watched it again today, i say the first 40-50 minutes are chilling and awesome, and after the I-Rex escape what happens with the ACU and all the weaponize stuff, civil person
Spoiler
Masrani the boss, sure
[close]
going to the battle smiling like a badass C movie character, uninstresting side characters,
Spoiler
T-rex  waiting in the door of his gigantic padock all day to come out to fight(?), talking dinos, throwing every dino in one scene for the final, also the Mosasaur is happened to be in the exact same spot where the dino fight is, and yeah he is eating for the 4th time on that day
[close]
...its just ridicilous, like the writers, producer, director only had 10 minutes to come up with a story and they were all drunk while writing it down. altough in the first 50 minutes there are also weird shit going on, already the weaponizing of dinos, plus the older kid. is he gay or is he just a duchebag or i dunno what was that girl starings all about, also  in the beginning her girlfriend say "i love you" and he says just "bye". it was weird man, why would you put this in your movie at all if you never exploit it?

still cant rate i above 5/10 personally, i rather watch Lost World and JP3 as sequels with all the dumb and unintresting characters in them than this madness


btw keep up doing your gameplay vids :)

Man none of those things are hard to explain.

Spoiler
T Rex was probably awake and chilling, with all the chaos it probably hears and feels. The door starts unlocking very loudly. Why wouldn't it go see what the noise is?

Talking dinos? Is this new or something?

Although the teamup is admittedly a bit ridiculous, what's wrong with having all these dinosaurs there? I mean it made sense. The pieces were set up.

The Mosasaur obviously can hear and/or feel all the commotion going on right next to it's enclosure. And I get the feeling that it just wants to hunt. Notnecessarily eat. And it saw it's opportunity. Not hard to believe at all.
[close]

just talking about one part, wouldnt be much better...


Spoiler
if Clair - well already would broke her heels off - would stand in the opened door with a flair, also that control room guy would triggered an automatic flair, shooting up into the sky, so the rex could see it from distance where he has to go, then Clair would scream with the flair in her hand...than suddenly you would hear the famous rex roar and Clair already would started to run, then the rex would appeared from the trees and not like an old guy but much fearsome like in the first movie......or it could go down like this if they were hinting that the rex is nervous all day since the i-rex broke out and went south, probably she can smell her....i mean damn, so many easy little touches could make this movie a solid 7-8/10


about the talking, the interspieces talking what bothers me, rex & raptors, it indicates since its the same rex that they were talking in the first movie too...i mean they were introduced there as simple realistic animals, not planet of the ape monster dinos
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Jun 15, 2015, 09:41:31 AM
I know a lot of people enjoyed this, and I really did go in with an open mind but I walked out with so many complaints I can't even be bothered to list them. The next time Colin decides to pour his heart and soul into something I hope it's down the toilet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Jun 15, 2015, 11:02:52 AM
This film's grown on me. I went and saw it again today and enjoyed it much more.

I think although paying homage to the first film in so many ways, at the same time disrespected it and for people who feel this way it's hard to look past that. The first film and even the other sequels were all grounded, restricting themselves to the believable if impossible science of bringing dinosaurs to life. Now they're just making a fantastical over the top film about a hybrid monster with mutant powers, soldier raptors and dino royal rumbles etc That's ok to me. This film's not perfect, I never thought it would be so I've accepted it as what it is... a ridiculous, over the top load of fun.

The poor film making was still present. Some things just didn't make sense and could have been executed much better but I can overlook that in the name of enjoying the fun it provides. An example

Spoiler
The way D'onofrio goes out... it didn't sit well with me. It could have been executed better. Same as the T rex arrival
[close]

Quote from: szkoki on Jun 15, 2015, 09:00:25 AM
just talking about one part, wouldnt be much better...


Spoiler
if Clair - well already would broke her heels off - would stand in the opened door with a flair, also that control room guy would triggered an automatic flair, shooting up into the sky, so the rex could see it from distance where he has to go, then Clair would scream with the flair in her hand...than suddenly you would hear the famous rex roar and Clair already would started to run, then the rex would appeared from the trees and not like an old guy but much fearsome like in the first movie......or it could go down like this if they were hinting that the rex is nervous all day since the i-rex broke out and went south, probably she can smell her....i mean damn, so many easy little touches could make this movie a solid 7-8/10


about the talking, the interspieces talking what bothers me, rex & raptors, it indicates since its the same rex that they were talking in the first movie too...i mean they were introduced there as simple realistic animals, not planet of the ape monster dinos
[close]

Better yet...

Spoiler
leave the t rex reveal for the imagination, BDH still opens the gate for the rex, standing there holding the flare, but nothing more is shown after that, never see the t rex at all until the last possible moment, it's only heard, maybe shadows etc... vibrations of footsteps, (like in spider man 2 when dr octpus attacks peter and mj at the diner,) cut back to the I Rex trying to get at the 3 survivors, nek minit it gets hit with a thrown flare... wide shot from a low angle of I rex as it turns around as...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.soundonsight.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F04%2Fjurassicpark-trex-footmud-full.jpg&hash=e15bc4475dcd60ad9a7d8c3aa7d711e573b83112)

although that sounds a little too much like godzilla 2014 doesn't it? screw it the end was basically a godzilla fight lol
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 15, 2015, 11:38:00 AM
no its sounds cooler than my idea


Spoiler
and have Clair faith remain unclear until the very end of the movie/after the battle, if she died or not letting out Rexy. see we could come up 2 much better ideas in 24 hours than the film did in months or so
[close]



so do you guys think the I-rex

Spoiler
died in the end or is she talked herself out in that situation with the Mosasaurus. maybe she just let herself get captured to make  a bigger impact in the 5th movie. or she comes back riding the Mosasaurus in the Sand Diego bay
[close]



im a bit dissapointed not to see enough animatronics aswell in the movie, i can count on one hand how many times they included it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-3g35MC8so
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 15, 2015, 12:35:15 PM
I think my favourite scene was Wu butting heads with Masrani. I won't spoil what the conversation was about for those of you who haven't seen the film yet, but just know that the dialogue is fantastic and both actors work off of each other tremendously well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 15, 2015, 01:06:41 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 15, 2015, 12:35:15 PM
I think my favourite scene was Wu butting heads with Masrani.

It's a scene taken from the original novel.

Spoiler
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GBB62IgLoI
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Keg on Jun 15, 2015, 01:11:24 PM
Yeah I quite liked that scene too. Felt a bit weird seeing Wu as a sort of bad guy after his chirpy, smiley persona in the first film but it worked. Not that they would have used anything from the Telltale game intentionally but it actually fit with some of the things Dr Sorkin had in her Journal about Wu.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 15, 2015, 01:37:10 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 15, 2015, 01:06:41 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 15, 2015, 12:35:15 PM
I think my favourite scene was Wu butting heads with Masrani.

It's a scene taken from the original novel.

Spoiler
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GBB62IgLoI
[close]

Oh I know. It was well-done. As for Wu being the bad guy, I disagree. Like he said, he was only doing what needed to be done. Masrani wanted something new and that's exactly what he received.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Keg on Jun 15, 2015, 02:18:00 PM
Nah I didnt mean literally a bad guy. Thats why I said "sort of". He just doesnt seem to have a moral compass. Goes back to what Malcolm said in the first film about not stopping to think if you should. Also because hes kinda taking orders from Vic it kinda makes him look more villanous.
Spoiler
I read a review that said he hated how Wu was the bad guy plotting with Vic to cause an incident in order to have an excuse to weaponize the raptors. I don't know what film he watched because that doesnt ever happen. Sure Vic does appear to be a bit smug with the situation and does indeed use it as an opportunity but they definately did not plan this or set it in motion unless I missed some major bit of dialogue somewhere?
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 15, 2015, 02:47:00 PM
Although not the main character, Wu is an anti hero  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 15, 2015, 03:50:30 PM
It was either his persona or his wardrobe but Wu just oozed "Bond villain" to me. I know I just said he wasn't a bad guy because he was following his orders, but damned if I didn't feel that way about him towards the end.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 15, 2015, 05:48:27 PM
And interestingly....

Spoiler
...we've never had a "villain" survive a JP movie before. It's a nice switch.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 15, 2015, 06:21:41 PM
Wow it dethroned avengers. NEAT! :)

$208.8 million. Not bad and it had a better plot then the Avengers did. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 15, 2015, 06:43:03 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 15, 2015, 05:48:27 PM
And interestingly....

Spoiler
...we've never had a "villain" survive a JP movie before. It's a nice switch.
[close]

Well, depending on your perspective, Hammond did. Some would argue it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jun 15, 2015, 06:47:15 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 15, 2015, 06:43:03 PMWell, depending on your perspective, Hammond did. Some would argue it.

Hammond in the film was nothing like as dark as in the book though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 15, 2015, 07:19:14 PM
Hammond in the movies was all but a villain... Hammond in the book arguably wasn't, either. He was just a prick.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Jun 15, 2015, 07:21:35 PM
"Jurassic World opened even bigger than was estimated! Universal Pictures today announced that with Sunday's reported actuals, Jurassic World is now the No. 1 movie ever at both the North American and international box offices. With a worldwide opening of $524.1 million, Jurassic World takes its place as the highest-grossing opening weekend in history.

Jurassic World grossed $208.8 million at the North American box office, passing 2012's The Avengers ($207.4 million). Internationally, the film's final gross was raised to $315.3 million, passing 2011's Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 ($314 million).

With this weekend's record-breaking opening of Jurassic World, Universal Pictures also scored two more box office records. The studio crossed the $1 billion mark at the domestic box office, beating the previous record climb achieved on June 22, 2008 by Paramount, and $3 billion worldwide, passing 20th Century Fox, which reached $3 billion on June 30, 2010."

www.comingsoon.net
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 15, 2015, 07:27:05 PM
Quote from: Keg on Jun 15, 2015, 02:18:00 PM
Nah I didnt mean literally a bad guy. Thats why I said "sort of". He just doesnt seem to have a moral compass. Goes back to what Malcolm said in the first film about not stopping to think if you should. Also because hes kinda taking orders from Vic it kinda makes him look more villanous.
Spoiler
I read a review that said he hated how Wu was the bad guy plotting with Vic to cause an incident in order to have an excuse to weaponize the raptors. I don't know what film he watched because that doesnt ever happen. Sure Vic does appear to be a bit smug with the situation and does indeed use it as an opportunity but they definately did not plan this or set it in motion unless I missed some major bit of dialogue somewhere?
[close]

Actually I got that from the film too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 15, 2015, 07:46:42 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 15, 2015, 07:19:14 PM
Hammond in the movies was all but a villain... Hammond in the book arguably wasn't, either. He was just a prick.

Some might argue he was because he was dabbling in a science he had no business dabbling in.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Jun 15, 2015, 07:48:34 PM
This was basically me and I guess a load of people on here as well....

http://9gag.com/gag/aMQ2BAM?ref=mobile.s.cp
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 15, 2015, 08:24:02 PM
http://www.tor.com/2015/06/12/how-to-survive-a-dinosaur-disaster/

QuoteIf you're going to survive the terror that follows, there are a few things you should do. They won't guarantee your safety, but they'll definitely help your survival.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 15, 2015, 09:42:59 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 15, 2015, 07:46:42 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 15, 2015, 07:19:14 PM
Hammond in the movies was all but a villain... Hammond in the book arguably wasn't, either. He was just a prick.

Some might argue he was because he was dabbling in a science he had no business dabbling in.
Some might argue in a pretty forced manner.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 15, 2015, 09:51:27 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 15, 2015, 09:42:59 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 15, 2015, 07:46:42 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 15, 2015, 07:19:14 PM
Hammond in the movies was all but a villain... Hammond in the book arguably wasn't, either. He was just a prick.

Some might argue he was because he was dabbling in a science he had no business dabbling in.
Some might argue in a pretty forced manner.
That's a philosophical way of looking at it. None the less Hammond is not a villain at all. It was Ned that f**ked everything up out of pure greed.

As far as Jurassic World goes Vic simply saw an opportunity and took it. Wu's a scientist, hell maybe even a Jame Bond villain now but he's only doing what they ask of him. The private sector sees money in the militarization of dinos so that would be the villain. The big bad faceless corporation?

Still the entire problem was the inherit secrecy of it all. So much so that not even Claire knew what the hell was really going on which lead Owen and crew to assume it was safe to enter the pen. It will all be covered up in the end.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 15, 2015, 10:34:35 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jurassicworld.org%2Fnews%2Fuploads%2FJW2CustomLogoSnow-Small.jpg&hash=5510221091a95d3855da11587579e27e3447c75c)
http://www.jurassicworld.org/?id=326


(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fak-hdl.buzzfed.com%2Fstatic%2F2015-02%2F18%2F11%2Fenhanced%2Fwebdr02%2Fanigif_enhanced-28636-1424275261-4.gif&hash=e215e648e846c70444b278cec2ab939da3c7e765)


QuoteChris Pratt first confirmed that he signed on for multiple sequels (likely two more)
talking about these movies are not about a few people's bad luck, when Trevor was asked if old characters would come back. huh really?


honestly the JP  universe is flashed out. you can tell after JW....no more Island could do it, only a post-apocaliptyc world with dinos everywhere. not if the story were  so important in JW.


oh dear god, just watching the vid while i was posting. he confirms my idea xD this all will go Planet of the Apes, and who are the writers?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 15, 2015, 11:45:24 PM
Dino-human-hybrids!

That'll be the plot of the 3rd movie.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: razeak on Jun 15, 2015, 11:53:58 PM
Spoiler
I didn't get that D'onofrio was making the incident happen. I thought the I. Rex just gave him an opportunity. Did I miss something?
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PRI. HUDSON on Jun 16, 2015, 01:02:58 AM
The director obviosuly was an Aliens fan. Life support displays going nil and the camera's used by the mercenaries. It all screamed James Cameron. Not sure if that was brought up by anyone.

It was awesome. Haters just have to deal with it. Sure, it wasn't perfect, but it was a VERY GOOD film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 16, 2015, 01:21:56 AM
Quote from: PRI. HUDSON on Jun 16, 2015, 01:02:58 AM
The director obviosuly was an Aliens fan. Life support displays going nil and the camera's used by the mercenaries. It all screamed James Cameron. Not sure if that was brought up by anyone.

and a Predator fan too
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Jun 16, 2015, 03:00:14 AM
Lol this is freaking weird, the biggest movie with some of the worst reviews I've seen! Just seeing more and more every day, it's bizarre.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: evolution_rex on Jun 16, 2015, 03:10:38 AM
Jurassic World Review (SPOILERS!)
Spoiler

I've been a Jurassic Park fan since I was a kid. Michael Crichton's novel was the first chapter book I read that I finished, and I instantly fell in love with the series. The movies are a big part of my life and has inspired my love for science fiction and film. Jurassic Park 3 was the last Jurassic Park film to come out and that was a bad way to go, so the long awaited Jurassic Park 4 became sort of an obsession. People have waited years and have followed the film's rich production history, filled with hilariously bad or deemly interesting concepts (some of which actually ended up in this new one), and I cannot think of any other film that was in development hell for so long that continued to be posted around the internet and continue to give fans hope or disappointment. So as a Jurassic Park fan, Jurassic World was highly anticipated.

Originally, I thought the basic idea of the film was completely wrong. A new park felt repetitious, they'd done in two of the three sequels already and I thought they needed to move on. But I eventually realized it had been a long time for some fans, and seeing the 'what if the park was populated' overwhelmingly overruled any qualms I had with it. It was the right decision. I hated the concept of the Jurassic Park series including something like the Indomnious Rex, but as the movie's production went on I realized that it was going to be done tastefully. The trained raptors had me initially skeptical but I thought they were going to pull that off. So by the time I watched it, I thought they had the full concept down and I knew none of that was going to be the issue. The only qualm I held to the very end was the fact that the new Jurassic World took place on Isla Nublar, which seemed to have implied to be either bombed or raided until there were no more dinosaurs left by the second film. However while watching it, there were no dinosaurs implied to be living from the old days of the park except for the Rex (who could have survived, along with a few other dinosaurs, long enough for Masrani to buy the island or it could have at some point been moved to Sorna.) It's also entirely possible that InGen did nothing to the animals and that during the second film, there was some negotiations between Masrani and InGen and Peter Ludlow, the antagonist of The Lost World, only said that they had 'deconstructed' the island so he could keep it a secret. Whatever the details of it are, it doesn't seem like anything contradicts it. So in my eyes, Jurassic World is very much a fourth film and not a reboot that takes the last two out of canon.

So, as I said, the movie's premise sounded fun to me, and I was ready to watch it. However, the film has some issues and after watching it twice, I think I can say I know where the movie's problems lay. The Jurassic Park series has always been comical and to some extent cartoony, but with this film it felt too cartoony at times. Almost comic book-ish. To be honest, it felt like a Marvel film at times. Which is fine, but it did go overboard with the humor, cheese, and lack of realism in moments. But overall it did not have a big enough impact on me as I was expecting. The film tries it's hardest to capture the tone and feel of the original movies and I think it mostly does, even if there were a few jokes that missed the mark for me ('Yeah definitely him!' and 'sorry I have a boyfriend' for example) and that the film fluctuations from a dark tone to a light tone very suddenly (something that the original films are guilty of, but not to the same extent as this film). Personally, I had wished that this movie take on the tone of the Planet of the Apes reboot series and 2014's Godzilla. I had always envisioned the films getting darker, not lighter. And unfortunately I feel jumping on the lighthearted Marvel-esque bandwagon is the easiest way to go. I'm not going to consider that a flaw in the film, but I do think there were better ways to do it.

I thought I would have a problem with the acting, but for the most part I didn't. Pratt did a great job, better than I thought. He's written as a simple rough and tough guy, simple but good. He doesn't overact in a classic Harrison Ford style. I know people are tired of hearing it, but Pratt does make a good Neo-Harrison Ford and I'd watch as Indiana Jones for sure. Bryce Dallas Howard is okay, she acts the way her character is written, and people have claimed that her acting was wooden and I think it's because she her character has a lot of humor (not that she makes jokes, but that she's a cartoonish depiction of a female scientist who's too busy for a family and is a bit 'prissy') and so when you're playing that kind of character, a certain amount ham and cheese in that performance helps. The one actor who didn't like was, of course, Ty Simpkins, who had a few cringe worthy moments of bad acting. The kid's bad by kid actor standards and it's him that makes some parts of the movie a groan. But, one child actor doesn't ruin the movie for me.

The role of the kids in the movie wasn't that bad either. I know a lot of people seem to be annoyed, but I thought the scenes were watchable. What makes kids in movies a drag is when they have no reason to be there, like in the second film. In this movie, the kids are there for a reason and they are made a central plot point which is exactly what they needed to do. I actually wished that they were lost in the jungle for a bit longer, because I would have loved to see a movie of just those kids exploring the ruins of the old park. Maybe that's more so because of ruined park than the kids, and I felt it was a lot of lost potential to put it in the movie for just a small amount of time.

There does seem to be a few plot points in the movie that should have been explained further or brought up again later but weren't, mainly (as I said above) the ruins and the I Rex's ability to camouflage. I'm not sure why they were introduced if they were only going to be seen for a few seconds. There were a couple references to the Dilophosaurus and it feels as if they intended to make a scene with the Dilophosaurus but it was pulled at some point. We see Jimmy Fallon talk about them and we see it later in the film as a hologram. What I find interesting is that they'd go through the trouble of making a CGI model for the Dilophosaurus and only use it for a hologram. I feel they added that scene in the movie because the other scene was cut and they didn't want to the cheat the audience. I do not think this movie was overplotted though, I've seen that word used to describe this movie and I find it hilarious. People have said that the parent's of the kid's divorcing was an unnecessary plotpoint, but I didn't see it as a plotpoint, just some added backstory so we know that the kids generally aren't happy and that something is wrong with the happy family, but at the end it comes together because both mom and dad, forgetting about their divorce, care nothing more than to see their kids after traumatic event. It was fine, and they even did something similar in the first two films. The fact that the kids are somehow car experts should have also been set up earlier in the film.

Dialogue didn't feel as bad as people have made it out to be. There were actually quite a few lines I liked (Larry alluding to the chaos theory, Wu explaining that the dinosaurs aren't actually what the dinosaurs look like, the speech Hoskins makes about using raptors as weapons.) They felt within the realm of Jurassic Park's dialogue. The moments the dialogue didn't work was when they tried to be funny but it didn't work. Nothing dialogue wise is bad, and I don't really understand why people have had a hard time with it.

All the characters are written reasonably as well. None of them are amazing well written Walter Whites here, but they don't really need that. The series has never been known for amazing characters except for Ian Malcolm, and development for characters are mostly nonexistent in these kinds of movies. So the characters are acceptable and Pratt's character is sort of a staple character that's hard to hate. Howard's character could have used some more work, could have had a bit more to do than just let loose a Tyrannosaurus instead of staying with her two nephews.

By the way, letting loose the Tyrannosaurus was a hilariously bad idea to me. There is this big dinosaurs mutant that could kill your and your nephews at any moment, and you choose to leave them and run away (which, if she was able to run away to get that Rex, they they were all able to run away and find safety), to set another giant animal on the loose. It's a risky idea that would have only worked in the context of this movie, and all because the nephew said 'not enough teeth' The fight scene at the end was cool and all though, up until the Mosasaurus came. My suspension of disbelief of seeing a raptor side with a Rex to fight the bad guy was already on the edge, and to see the Mosasaur coincidentally in that area and deciding that it would bother those two large animals boggles my mind a bit. It goes into what I was saying earlier, there are moments in the film where it gets too ridiculous. Not so ridiculous that it makes the whole movie ridiculous, but it was too silly for my taste.
Claire letting loose the Rex wasn't the worst bad decision making of the film, that goes to Masrani deciding that he, who as the film shows was humorously bad at flying, fly the helicopter filled with weapons and soldiers to take down a very important danger that could hurt a lot of people. Could a more experienced pilot have avoided the Pterosaurs? Not only was it a stupid mistake on Masrani's part, but it made the tone confusing. His bad piloting skills was a joke, and then he's crashing. It's hard not to unintentionally laugh a little in my head.

There were two other really bad aspects as well. The first one was the two instances where a cell phone and a walkie talkie stopped working for absolutely no reason other than plot convenience. That's utterly unforgivable to me and was simply just lazy writing. The other thing is the product placement, which worked during the scenes in the main center of the park, but did not work when Claire was driving the Mercedes around and Chris Pratt drinking Coca Cola like it was a TV commercial. Now, they made a joke about it during the film with, talking about letting the companies name the creatures, but joking about it like that doesn't make it acceptable. This film may have had more product placement than any film this year, and I wouldn't even be surprised if it beat Transformers: Extinction. I know Trevorrow tried to say that it was used to further the anti-corporate message, but I don't completely buy it. That Mercedes car was used a bit too much, or at least used in the wrong way. But like I said, the moments in the park's center worked fine and I would have even allowed it to go further in those areas, but they were most prominent elsewhere.

The movie wasn't without it's little moments of genius though. There were a lot of tiny references and homages to original three that were done tastefully and were subtle, making it neat. It copies cinematic shots at times, which is a nice subconscious addition to make it seem more fitting with the other films (the best being the destruction of the Spinosaurus skeleton, the worst being Hoskin creating the yell that Dennis Nedry makes when he dies). There are some nice touches like the moment where Grady reaches out his hand to help Claire down the steps, but her hurriedly walking past him. It felt very spielbergian. There was also nice shot of the Hoskin grunt in the helicopter shooting down the Dimorphodon. The scene where the older kid ignores the Tyrannosaurus Rex eating the goat to answer a phone call was good as well (and, from my understanding, was part of the initial pitch that director Colin Trevorrow gave) And, of course, the beginning in which shows a giant foot which pans into the foot of a small bird. I want to say that those little moments had to have come from Spielberg or Frank Marshall because they felt like classic filmmaking.

The film's pacing was very good at first, I thought the scenes before the I Rex escaped were great. You felt this good sense of wonder and you really got the sense that this was a theme park. It's not exactly the same kind of wonder as the first film though, because in the first film there was this sort of primal wonder involving the fascination of dinosaurs. This felt different, like the wonder of Disneyland. Maybe that was the intention though. But anyway, the pacing eventually turns too fast and I really thought that there should have been a night scene after the raptor chase that was just calm. There needs to a be scene like in the first Jurassic Park where they find a tree and just sleep in it for awhile, and then they run into the Brachiosaurus. There needed to be a little bit of the return of the wonder during that time. The film in general felt too short as well, but not in such a way that I was unsatisfied.

Visual effects were fine. None of it was state of the art and it'll look goofy in five years, but it's not different than most visual effects these days. I think what gets people going about it was that there really hasn't been many movies like Jurassic Park since Peter Jackson's King Kong. It's not like Transformers or any these superhero movies, filled with CGI robots and side grunts, and it's not like Godzilla where there is only one or two CGI creatures. This was a movie with a large amount of CGI animals and when you've got that, it's going to look different to you. But at the end of the day the visual effects were fine. I only had an issue during one scene, and that was when the overweight employee was killed by the I Rex near the beginning, the shadowing was very odd (that guy's comical face also didn't help improve the scene). I am, however, upset that there was only one animatronic that I could see. I thought they had built an animatronic of the I Rex head, but I couldn't see it used anywhere. The Raptor heads, when in the muzzles, may have been partially practical. But overall I am disappointed of the lack of practical dinosaurs. I wouldn't be if they hadn't promised it first though.

What really helps improve this movie a lot is the soundtrack. Michael Giacchino does a very good job making the Jurassic Park music. It feels like it fits in with the other soundtracks without continuously reusing the classic themes. It ties everything together and solidifies it as Jurassic Park film. The soundtrack doesn't compare to the original film's soundtrack or The Lost World's soundtrack, but those are hard to beat.
I quite liked the setup and it seems to imply that Wu will be the villain of the next one in some capacity (I also simply just liked that Wu returned to the series in general). It seems that Hoskins and Wu created the I Rex as a weapon, and that the next film will involve dinosaur hybrids as bioweapons. My fear is that it's just going to end up being ridiculous. Did anyone else catch the Stegoceratops on the computer screen? It's not a direction I want the series to go. But I'm excited nonetheless.

This film also has a meaning behind it, a sort of subtext, which is nice. From what I got, this film is almost a satire on the film series itself. It's been a long time since the last one was out, and now people today don't really pay much attention to the original Jurassic Park. Some of the younger generation simply don't like it. So, in real life, when deciding how to solve this for a fourth Jurassic Park movie, they came up with the I Rexo to parallel it the film with real life, they came up with the idea of the I Rex being used to up the wow factor at park where everyone is getting bored of dinosaurs. It was a great way to approach it and the way it. And before you think I'm bullshitting, this is coming from Chris Pratt who said this awhile ago during the film's production.

Overall, this is a respectable sequel that I think is the third best in the franchise. The best way to sum it up is that they went too far in a few places, but only a few. At the very least it's good popcorn fun, which is exactly what the other three were.

Jurassic World- 7/10
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Jun 16, 2015, 03:59:14 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iN6Rlh4KonQ
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 16, 2015, 05:21:48 AM
Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 16, 2015, 03:59:14 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iN6Rlh4KonQ

Mr. plinkett approves this movie?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Jun 16, 2015, 06:00:16 AM
Quote from: evolution_rex on Jun 16, 2015, 03:10:38 AM
Jurassic World Review (SPOILERS!)
Spoiler

I've been a Jurassic Park fan since I was a kid. Michael Crichton's novel was the first chapter book I read that I finished, and I instantly fell in love with the series. The movies are a big part of my life and has inspired my love for science fiction and film. Jurassic Park 3 was the last Jurassic Park film to come out and that was a bad way to go, so the long awaited Jurassic Park 4 became sort of an obsession. People have waited years and have followed the film's rich production history, filled with hilariously bad or deemly interesting concepts (some of which actually ended up in this new one), and I cannot think of any other film that was in development hell for so long that continued to be posted around the internet and continue to give fans hope or disappointment. So as a Jurassic Park fan, Jurassic World was highly anticipated.

Originally, I thought the basic idea of the film was completely wrong. A new park felt repetitious, they'd done in two of the three sequels already and I thought they needed to move on. But I eventually realized it had been a long time for some fans, and seeing the 'what if the park was populated' overwhelmingly overruled any qualms I had with it. It was the right decision. I hated the concept of the Jurassic Park series including something like the Indomnious Rex, but as the movie's production went on I realized that it was going to be done tastefully. The trained raptors had me initially skeptical but I thought they were going to pull that off. So by the time I watched it, I thought they had the full concept down and I knew none of that was going to be the issue. The only qualm I held to the very end was the fact that the new Jurassic World took place on Isla Nublar, which seemed to have implied to be either bombed or raided until there were no more dinosaurs left by the second film. However while watching it, there were no dinosaurs implied to be living from the old days of the park except for the Rex (who could have survived, along with a few other dinosaurs, long enough for Masrani to buy the island or it could have at some point been moved to Sorna.) It's also entirely possible that InGen did nothing to the animals and that during the second film, there was some negotiations between Masrani and InGen and Peter Ludlow, the antagonist of The Lost World, only said that they had 'deconstructed' the island so he could keep it a secret. Whatever the details of it are, it doesn't seem like anything contradicts it. So in my eyes, Jurassic World is very much a fourth film and not a reboot that takes the last two out of canon.

So, as I said, the movie's premise sounded fun to me, and I was ready to watch it. However, the film has some issues and after watching it twice, I think I can say I know where the movie's problems lay. The Jurassic Park series has always been comical and to some extent cartoony, but with this film it felt too cartoony at times. Almost comic book-ish. To be honest, it felt like a Marvel film at times. Which is fine, but it did go overboard with the humor, cheese, and lack of realism in moments. But overall it did not have a big enough impact on me as I was expecting. The film tries it's hardest to capture the tone and feel of the original movies and I think it mostly does, even if there were a few jokes that missed the mark for me ('Yeah definitely him!' and 'sorry I have a boyfriend' for example) and that the film fluctuations from a dark tone to a light tone very suddenly (something that the original films are guilty of, but not to the same extent as this film). Personally, I had wished that this movie take on the tone of the Planet of the Apes reboot series and 2014's Godzilla. I had always envisioned the films getting darker, not lighter. And unfortunately I feel jumping on the lighthearted Marvel-esque bandwagon is the easiest way to go. I'm not going to consider that a flaw in the film, but I do think there were better ways to do it.

I thought I would have a problem with the acting, but for the most part I didn't. Pratt did a great job, better than I thought. He's written as a simple rough and tough guy, simple but good. He doesn't overact in a classic Harrison Ford style. I know people are tired of hearing it, but Pratt does make a good Neo-Harrison Ford and I'd watch as Indiana Jones for sure. Bryce Dallas Howard is okay, she acts the way her character is written, and people have claimed that her acting was wooden and I think it's because she her character has a lot of humor (not that she makes jokes, but that she's a cartoonish depiction of a female scientist who's too busy for a family and is a bit 'prissy') and so when you're playing that kind of character, a certain amount ham and cheese in that performance helps. The one actor who didn't like was, of course, Ty Simpkins, who had a few cringe worthy moments of bad acting. The kid's bad by kid actor standards and it's him that makes some parts of the movie a groan. But, one child actor doesn't ruin the movie for me.

The role of the kids in the movie wasn't that bad either. I know a lot of people seem to be annoyed, but I thought the scenes were watchable. What makes kids in movies a drag is when they have no reason to be there, like in the second film. In this movie, the kids are there for a reason and they are made a central plot point which is exactly what they needed to do. I actually wished that they were lost in the jungle for a bit longer, because I would have loved to see a movie of just those kids exploring the ruins of the old park. Maybe that's more so because of ruined park than the kids, and I felt it was a lot of lost potential to put it in the movie for just a small amount of time.

There does seem to be a few plot points in the movie that should have been explained further or brought up again later but weren't, mainly (as I said above) the ruins and the I Rex's ability to camouflage. I'm not sure why they were introduced if they were only going to be seen for a few seconds. There were a couple references to the Dilophosaurus and it feels as if they intended to make a scene with the Dilophosaurus but it was pulled at some point. We see Jimmy Fallon talk about them and we see it later in the film as a hologram. What I find interesting is that they'd go through the trouble of making a CGI model for the Dilophosaurus and only use it for a hologram. I feel they added that scene in the movie because the other scene was cut and they didn't want to the cheat the audience. I do not think this movie was overplotted though, I've seen that word used to describe this movie and I find it hilarious. People have said that the parent's of the kid's divorcing was an unnecessary plotpoint, but I didn't see it as a plotpoint, just some added backstory so we know that the kids generally aren't happy and that something is wrong with the happy family, but at the end it comes together because both mom and dad, forgetting about their divorce, care nothing more than to see their kids after traumatic event. It was fine, and they even did something similar in the first two films. The fact that the kids are somehow car experts should have also been set up earlier in the film.

Dialogue didn't feel as bad as people have made it out to be. There were actually quite a few lines I liked (Larry alluding to the chaos theory, Wu explaining that the dinosaurs aren't actually what the dinosaurs look like, the speech Hoskins makes about using raptors as weapons.) They felt within the realm of Jurassic Park's dialogue. The moments the dialogue didn't work was when they tried to be funny but it didn't work. Nothing dialogue wise is bad, and I don't really understand why people have had a hard time with it.

All the characters are written reasonably as well. None of them are amazing well written Walter Whites here, but they don't really need that. The series has never been known for amazing characters except for Ian Malcolm, and development for characters are mostly nonexistent in these kinds of movies. So the characters are acceptable and Pratt's character is sort of a staple character that's hard to hate. Howard's character could have used some more work, could have had a bit more to do than just let loose a Tyrannosaurus instead of staying with her two nephews.

By the way, letting loose the Tyrannosaurus was a hilariously bad idea to me. There is this big dinosaurs mutant that could kill your and your nephews at any moment, and you choose to leave them and run away (which, if she was able to run away to get that Rex, they they were all able to run away and find safety), to set another giant animal on the loose. It's a risky idea that would have only worked in the context of this movie, and all because the nephew said 'not enough teeth' The fight scene at the end was cool and all though, up until the Mosasaurus came. My suspension of disbelief of seeing a raptor side with a Rex to fight the bad guy was already on the edge, and to see the Mosasaur coincidentally in that area and deciding that it would bother those two large animals boggles my mind a bit. It goes into what I was saying earlier, there are moments in the film where it gets too ridiculous. Not so ridiculous that it makes the whole movie ridiculous, but it was too silly for my taste.
Claire letting loose the Rex wasn't the worst bad decision making of the film, that goes to Masrani deciding that he, who as the film shows was humorously bad at flying, fly the helicopter filled with weapons and soldiers to take down a very important danger that could hurt a lot of people. Could a more experienced pilot have avoided the Pterosaurs? Not only was it a stupid mistake on Masrani's part, but it made the tone confusing. His bad piloting skills was a joke, and then he's crashing. It's hard not to unintentionally laugh a little in my head.

There were two other really bad aspects as well. The first one was the two instances where a cell phone and a walkie talkie stopped working for absolutely no reason other than plot convenience. That's utterly unforgivable to me and was simply just lazy writing. The other thing is the product placement, which worked during the scenes in the main center of the park, but did not work when Claire was driving the Mercedes around and Chris Pratt drinking Coca Cola like it was a TV commercial. Now, they made a joke about it during the film with, talking about letting the companies name the creatures, but joking about it like that doesn't make it acceptable. This film may have had more product placement than any film this year, and I wouldn't even be surprised if it beat Transformers: Extinction. I know Trevorrow tried to say that it was used to further the anti-corporate message, but I don't completely buy it. That Mercedes car was used a bit too much, or at least used in the wrong way. But like I said, the moments in the park's center worked fine and I would have even allowed it to go further in those areas, but they were most prominent elsewhere.

The movie wasn't without it's little moments of genius though. There were a lot of tiny references and homages to original three that were done tastefully and were subtle, making it neat. It copies cinematic shots at times, which is a nice subconscious addition to make it seem more fitting with the other films (the best being the destruction of the Spinosaurus skeleton, the worst being Hoskin creating the yell that Dennis Nedry makes when he dies). There are some nice touches like the moment where Grady reaches out his hand to help Claire down the steps, but her hurriedly walking past him. It felt very spielbergian. There was also nice shot of the Hoskin grunt in the helicopter shooting down the Dimorphodon. The scene where the older kid ignores the Tyrannosaurus Rex eating the goat to answer a phone call was good as well (and, from my understanding, was part of the initial pitch that director Colin Trevorrow gave) And, of course, the beginning in which shows a giant foot which pans into the foot of a small bird. I want to say that those little moments had to have come from Spielberg or Frank Marshall because they felt like classic filmmaking.

The film's pacing was very good at first, I thought the scenes before the I Rex escaped were great. You felt this good sense of wonder and you really got the sense that this was a theme park. It's not exactly the same kind of wonder as the first film though, because in the first film there was this sort of primal wonder involving the fascination of dinosaurs. This felt different, like the wonder of Disneyland. Maybe that was the intention though. But anyway, the pacing eventually turns too fast and I really thought that there should have been a night scene after the raptor chase that was just calm. There needs to a be scene like in the first Jurassic Park where they find a tree and just sleep in it for awhile, and then they run into the Brachiosaurus. There needed to be a little bit of the return of the wonder during that time. The film in general felt too short as well, but not in such a way that I was unsatisfied.

Visual effects were fine. None of it was state of the art and it'll look goofy in five years, but it's not different than most visual effects these days. I think what gets people going about it was that there really hasn't been many movies like Jurassic Park since Peter Jackson's King Kong. It's not like Transformers or any these superhero movies, filled with CGI robots and side grunts, and it's not like Godzilla where there is only one or two CGI creatures. This was a movie with a large amount of CGI animals and when you've got that, it's going to look different to you. But at the end of the day the visual effects were fine. I only had an issue during one scene, and that was when the overweight employee was killed by the I Rex near the beginning, the shadowing was very odd (that guy's comical face also didn't help improve the scene). I am, however, upset that there was only one animatronic that I could see. I thought they had built an animatronic of the I Rex head, but I couldn't see it used anywhere. The Raptor heads, when in the muzzles, may have been partially practical. But overall I am disappointed of the lack of practical dinosaurs. I wouldn't be if they hadn't promised it first though.

What really helps improve this movie a lot is the soundtrack. Michael Giacchino does a very good job making the Jurassic Park music. It feels like it fits in with the other soundtracks without continuously reusing the classic themes. It ties everything together and solidifies it as Jurassic Park film. The soundtrack doesn't compare to the original film's soundtrack or The Lost World's soundtrack, but those are hard to beat.
I quite liked the setup and it seems to imply that Wu will be the villain of the next one in some capacity (I also simply just liked that Wu returned to the series in general). It seems that Hoskins and Wu created the I Rex as a weapon, and that the next film will involve dinosaur hybrids as bioweapons. My fear is that it's just going to end up being ridiculous. Did anyone else catch the Stegoceratops on the computer screen? It's not a direction I want the series to go. But I'm excited nonetheless.

This film also has a meaning behind it, a sort of subtext, which is nice. From what I got, this film is almost a satire on the film series itself. It's been a long time since the last one was out, and now people today don't really pay much attention to the original Jurassic Park. Some of the younger generation simply don't like it. So, in real life, when deciding how to solve this for a fourth Jurassic Park movie, they came up with the I Rexo to parallel it the film with real life, they came up with the idea of the I Rex being used to up the wow factor at park where everyone is getting bored of dinosaurs. It was a great way to approach it and the way it. And before you think I'm bullshitting, this is coming from Chris Pratt who said this awhile ago during the film's production.

Overall, this is a respectable sequel that I think is the third best in the franchise. The best way to sum it up is that they went too far in a few places, but only a few. At the very least it's good popcorn fun, which is exactly what the other three were.

Jurassic World- 7/10
[close]

Bro any way of a tl;dr version?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 16, 2015, 07:12:02 AM
Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 16, 2015, 03:00:14 AM
Lol this is freaking weird, the biggest movie with some of the worst reviews I've seen! Just seeing more and more every day, it's bizarre.

To quote Owen..."Do you hear yourself when you talk?"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Keg on Jun 16, 2015, 07:17:22 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 16, 2015, 07:12:02 AM
Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 16, 2015, 03:00:14 AM
Lol this is freaking weird, the biggest movie with some of the worst reviews I've seen! Just seeing more and more every day, it's bizarre.

To quote Owen..."Do you hear yourself when you talk?"

This is getting average to decent reviews mostly so hardly worst reviews ive ever seen. Its a summer blockbuster, how is that bizarre. The Transformers films make a hell of alot of money and they literally do have some of the most scathing reviews ive seen. People enjoy a no brains blockbuster now and again and tend to ignore reviews anyway. This isnt anything new. Give it a rest Hubbs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 16, 2015, 09:14:40 AM
Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 16, 2015, 03:00:14 AM
Lol this is freaking weird, the biggest movie with some of the worst reviews I've seen! Just seeing more and more every day, it's bizarre.

Either you're cherry-picking or you're looking in the wrong place, because it's aggregating 85% (with average rating 82%) on RottenTomatoes' audience score.

I'm not the biggest fan of the film (or a hater), but I'm very glad to see a dinosaur movie taking the crown rather than yet another bloody superhero movie. It's something that'll have a huge positive knock-on effect in the real world - Jurassic Park's similarly extraordinary popularity interested a vast number of people in science, and the subsequent generation of palaeontologists has been exponentially larger and advanced our knowledge far more than any other in history. Great to see that this state of affairs looks secured for another generation.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 16, 2015, 11:35:11 AM
Vertigo: http://nerdist.com/the-public-is-ready-to-see-dinosaurs-with-feathers/

QuoteYou won't see feathers on any dinosaur in Jurassic World. And though are good reasons for this, the public is ready to see fluffy velociraptors and T. rex. We need to see them.

Quote from: whiterabbit on Jun 15, 2015, 09:51:27 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 15, 2015, 09:42:59 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 15, 2015, 07:46:42 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 15, 2015, 07:19:14 PM
Hammond in the movies was all but a villain... Hammond in the book arguably wasn't, either. He was just a prick.

Some might argue he was because he was dabbling in a science he had no business dabbling in.
Some might argue in a pretty forced manner.
That's a philosophical way of looking at it. None the less Hammond is not a villain at all. It was Ned that f**ked everything up out of pure greed.

Ned wouldn't have had anything to f**k up at all had Hammond not created the park in the first place. He was foolish to think he could control nature. Nature always wins in the end.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 16, 2015, 11:46:50 AM
Does not make him a villain.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 16, 2015, 11:55:04 AM
:P

https://youtu.be/f4W5DUKMBIQ?t=412

exactly
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 16, 2015, 11:59:17 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 16, 2015, 11:46:50 AM
Does not make him a villain.

In a way it does. All of the park-related deaths are on his head.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jun 16, 2015, 12:28:03 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 16, 2015, 11:35:11 AM
Ned wouldn't have had anything to f**k up at all had Hammond not created the park in the first place. He was foolish to think he could control nature. Nature always wins in the end.

Bit of a blanket statement. Zoo's control nature every day.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Jun 16, 2015, 12:32:25 PM
It was the costa rican government's fault for leasing the islands to  John Hammond. ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 16, 2015, 12:33:06 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 16, 2015, 11:59:17 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 16, 2015, 11:46:50 AM
Does not make him a villain.

In a way it does. All of the park-related deaths are on his head.
Oh please. If a mad engineer blows up a house or makes it collapse you don't blame the proprietor for it. You blame the engineer.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 16, 2015, 12:41:56 PM
no you blame who made that house, made it available to blown up
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 16, 2015, 12:42:15 PM
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Jun 16, 2015, 12:28:03 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 16, 2015, 11:35:11 AM
Ned wouldn't have had anything to f**k up at all had Hammond not created the park in the first place. He was foolish to think he could control nature. Nature always wins in the end.

Bit of a blanket statement. Zoo's control nature every day.

False equivalency. Zoos are able to control what already exists. They can fully understand it. They aren't attempting to control an ecosystem that vanished millions of years ago. They can't even begin to fully grasp that.

Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 16, 2015, 12:33:06 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 16, 2015, 11:59:17 AM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 16, 2015, 11:46:50 AM
Does not make him a villain.

In a way it does. All of the park-related deaths are on his head.
Oh please. If a mad engineer blows up a house or makes it collapse you don't blame the proprietor for it. You blame the engineer.

Everyone needs a house to live in. And yes, I can fault the proprietor because he's the one who hired the engineer. He should've known what kind of service he was paying for.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Jun 16, 2015, 01:00:35 PM
What I'm saying is, for a movie that has made so much money, been such a smash, most of the reviews are pretty poor. If a movie does this well then generally the reviews are very good from everyone (Avengers).

I get that its fun but the negative points seem to far outweigh that...from what I'm gathering.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 16, 2015, 01:08:26 PM
JUST GO SEE IT AND MAKE UP YOUR OWN MIND
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jun 16, 2015, 01:14:23 PM
Lol.

Also, it's really nothing new for films with mediocre or even terrible reviews to make a sh*t-ton of money. Someone already mentioned the Transformers movies.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 16, 2015, 01:14:35 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 16, 2015, 01:08:26 PM
JUST GO SEE IT AND MAKE UP YOUR OWN MIND


probably this will be the biggest arguement and question of the year. the demand has dropped over the years plus is Jurassic Park. probably thats why it made 500million and thats why the majority likes it


its just sadly strengthen the Hollywood machine to make shit blocbusters. cant imagine what will be next Star Wars or Alien now because at least with these kinda frenchise they should deliver something
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 16, 2015, 01:17:04 PM
Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 16, 2015, 01:00:35 PM
What I'm saying is, for a movie that has made so much money, been such a smash, most of the reviews are pretty poor. If a movie does this well then generally the reviews are very good from everyone (Avengers).

I get that its fun but the negative points seem to far outweigh that...from what I'm gathering.

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/jurassic_world/

Good god Hubbs. ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Jun 16, 2015, 01:17:26 PM
Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 16, 2015, 01:00:35 PM
What I'm saying is, for a movie that has made so much money, been such a smash, most of the reviews are pretty poor. If a movie does this well then generally the reviews are very good from everyone (Avengers).

I get that its fun but the negative points seem to far outweigh that...from what I'm gathering.

I don't know how many and which reviews you have been reading but most are varying from average to really positive rather then negative to average at best.

I think that, even if you'd watch the movie at this point, you kinda spoiled it for yourself by being so negative towards it, it will most likely cloud your whole experience of it while watching.


I personally thought the movie was great, especially as a hardcore JP fan, I remember seeing it in theaters in '93 as a 5 year old and to see a great sequel with so many homages to JP and being set on the 1st Island just got me psyched throughout, I thought it was great, the thing I think really set's its apart from JP is that there was little room for good character development due to there being (maybe) too much action sequences going on. JP had it perfectly balanced back then, there was a good build up to action sequences but between those there was allot of character development, which this sequel seemed to be missing, aside of a few moments, I really liked Claire and Owen, the children didn't bother me at all btw (which I expected they would, so) and Masrani was also a great newcomer, the return of Wu was great, I didn't expect him to have a little "dark streak'

Personally I could have also done without allot of the comic relief (which seems to be a thing in allot of movies/reboots/sequels these days ....) JP and TLW also managed perfectly well without it and I personally feel that comic relief mostly takes away allot of the flair a movie has rather then adding something to it.

Aside of that, this was my movie of the year and I have been looking forward to this ever since JP3 and I had been looking forward ever since JP 1 what happened to lots of stuff on the first Isla Nublar, I think it's great that they gave us a view of what happened, especially the visitor's centre and the T-rex.
Spoiler
the T-rex vs the I-rex might be over the top but I was having a raging blast at that point in cinema and came totally unexpected to me, I was fearing that, besides the little appearance in the beginning, we wouldn't see the rex anymore, and BOOM there she was, I was pumped with adrenaline the moment I heard her famous roar. I could almost cry when she came on. The T rex looked a little different, yes, but since she's 20 years older it's not so far fetched, she had the scars and colors but as far as the CGI making it look different, I thought it were the eyes that they made too yellow and too big compaired to the first movie. Anyways, I couldn't have wished for more considering the Rex saved the day. And the roar at the final scene was quite grand to me, but that's the fanboy speaking. I would have preferred if the Rex killed the Irex rather then the Mosasaur though, but had a blast nontheless :)
[close]

My personal rating)

Jurassic Park 10/10 (what's there not to like?)
The Lost world: 8/10
Jurassic Park 3 6/10
Jurassic World 8/10

I feel JW and TWL are on par, I always really enjoyed TWL, I never understood the hate for it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 16, 2015, 01:25:30 PM
every review says "its a big, dumb, summer blockbuster but   hey its fun so  its a good movie"



:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jun 16, 2015, 01:29:42 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 16, 2015, 12:42:15 PM
False equivalency. Zoos are able to control what already exists. They can fully understand it. They aren't attempting to control an ecosystem that vanished millions of years ago. They can't even begin to fully grasp that.

It's not the extinct ecosystem that they lost control of though. It's purposeful sabotage of the infrastructure that keeps the animals contained. It's nothing the animals did that caused the downfall of the park. If the security hadn't failed it wouldn't have happened. Granted some unforeseen adaptation of their modified genetics would have caused some issues later on down the line but probably nothing to that scale.

It doesn't make Hammond the villain.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Jun 16, 2015, 01:31:05 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Jun 16, 2015, 01:14:23 PM
Lol.

Also, it's really nothing new for films with mediocre or even terrible reviews to make a sh*t-ton of money. Someone already mentioned the Transformers movies.

They got bad reviews ;)

Plus after the garbage that was 'Kingsman'  ::) I won't hold my breath.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 16, 2015, 01:34:12 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 16, 2015, 11:35:11 AM
Vertigo: http://nerdist.com/the-public-is-ready-to-see-dinosaurs-with-feathers/

QuoteYou won't see feathers on any dinosaur in Jurassic World. And though there are good reasons for this, the public is ready to see fluffy velociraptors and T. rex. We need to see them.

Mm. I don't like the fuzzy JW raptor photoshops, but the Alexey Monzhaley sketch looks pretty good.

I think the thing to take away, and probably the reason for the 'no-feathers' outlook in the first place, is that it's harder than the old scalies to make them look accurate, cool and menacing. Not impossible, but a dramatically increased challenge. I'm sure Crash McCreery wouldn't have any difficulty with that, but I really don't know if JW's team could have done it.

A few other accurate (ish) dromie designs that might fit the bill

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg05.deviantart.net%2Fe758%2Fi%2F2011%2F302%2F1%2Fa%2Futahraptor_by_monopteryx-d4eb8f3.jpg&hash=107f55ac583459cb888671e30b631c089c0ac57e)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Forig09.deviantart.net%2F42b8%2Ff%2F2011%2F248%2Ff%2F6%2Futahraptor_v2_by_steveoc86-d48ytii.jpg&hash=dec6c02782f1829fbd43f09f516bd4a5702516d2)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg02.deviantart.net%2F92aa%2Fi%2F2014%2F248%2Fb%2F9%2Fdeinonychus_version_2_by_steveoc86-dzxqwu.png&hash=1879d557af7f8214aa77336eb3bf874bb48e6691)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fpre00.deviantart.net%2F8e9f%2Fth%2Fpre%2Ff%2F2012%2F361%2Fe%2F8%2Fachillobator_giganticus_by_teratophoneus-d5pbo7a.jpg&hash=b484a37887b5d7cd976f6a85420f97d8478a3ee8)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg07.deviantart.net%2F08da%2Fi%2F2012%2F036%2F2%2F0%2Futahraptor_ostrommaysorum_by_teratophoneus-d4oq7xm.jpg&hash=73d2afe193a1d71a190134325eadf21388b49d0f)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F40.media.tumblr.com%2F46ee15f6ccbf60ac06a23a1581f7909c%2Ftumblr_mknjznrQsv1r38ji3o1_1280.jpg&hash=132384190a98b029b82b68b8b0dcfed43f237493)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fboards.420chan.org%2Fdino%2Fsrc%2F1414455196018.jpg&hash=0f2ef26d19118db9cf15bc7eff1cbdcfa3876ce5)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fpre07.deviantart.net%2F325f%2Fth%2Fpre%2Ff%2F2010%2F327%2F4%2F8%2Fdeinonychus_by_monopteryx-d33gp55.jpg&hash=20670754d790dd809ab753276a39424dfb52394a)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2Fthumb%2Fc%2Fc3%2FUtahraptor_ostrommaysorum.png%2F800px-Utahraptor_ostrommaysorum.png&hash=3798c4a0c4cd13363331af907d9d3a47be6f04b6)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.khoahoc.tv%2Fphotos%2Fimage%2F2009%2F12%2F15%2Fdeinonychus-size-0x0-znd.jpg&hash=8278063a2ef83a8306f5525b07573421625aba2a)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Forig08.deviantart.net%2Fb370%2Ff%2F2012%2F078%2F2%2Fb%2Ftenontosaurus_vs_deinonychus_by_dustdevil-d4t8x1i.jpg&hash=a404632af76c96349426d998c47c07d9cb1fc2a2)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FoSkMOON.jpg&hash=18a0eca3584794ffc86389c1a72b0a73183fc2a4)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 16, 2015, 01:42:57 PM
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Jun 16, 2015, 01:29:42 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 16, 2015, 12:42:15 PM
False equivalency. Zoos are able to control what already exists. They can fully understand it. They aren't attempting to control an ecosystem that vanished millions of years ago. They can't even begin to fully grasp that.

It's not the extinct ecosystem that they lost control of though. It's purposeful sabotage of the infrastructure that keeps the animals contained. It's nothing the animals did that caused the downfall of the park. If the security hadn't failed it wouldn't have happened. Granted some unforeseen adaptation of their modified genetics would have caused some issues later on down the line but probably nothing to that scale.

It doesn't make Hammond the villain.

Park security was one aspect of it. They could never have controlled something they didn't fully understand even if that hadn't happened. How do you go about controlling a world that died out 66 million years ago? The novel expands on this greatly and it's touched on in the film with the dinosaurs breeding.

Oh, and Vertigo: I think that 'shop job is one of the better ones ;)
Also, someone posted an article on Facebook where Bakker said no-feathers was due to expense in rendering. Not sure I believe that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 16, 2015, 01:49:32 PM
I read an artist comment on that theory recently, and it's certainly prohibitively resource-intensive to render individual feathers across an entire entity, but it's pretty easy if you just model most of it as a static block, then hair-process the extremities.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jun 16, 2015, 01:55:27 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 16, 2015, 01:42:57 PMPark security was one aspect of it. They could never have controlled something they didn't fully understand even if that hadn't happened. How do you go about controlling a world that died out 66 million years ago? The novel expands on this greatly and it's touched on in the film with the dinosaurs breeding.

Still doesn't make Hammond a villain. At worst he's misguided and over-zealous. But his intentions in the film seem perfectly benevolent.

I do remember him being a little more ambiguous in the novel though. At least, he came across as a darker character less interested in bringing joy to the world and more interested in himself.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 16, 2015, 02:12:53 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Jun 16, 2015, 01:55:27 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 16, 2015, 01:42:57 PMPark security was one aspect of it. They could never have controlled something they didn't fully understand even if that hadn't happened. How do you go about controlling a world that died out 66 million years ago? The novel expands on this greatly and it's touched on in the film with the dinosaurs breeding.

Still doesn't make Hammond a villain. At worst he's misguided and over-zealous. But his intentions in the film seem perfectly benevolent.

I do remember him being a little more ambiguous in the novel though. At least, he came across as a darker character less interested in bringing joy to the world and more interested in himself.

I'll agree with that. Like Ludlow said, "Hammond's grasp exceeded his reach."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Keg on Jun 16, 2015, 02:13:29 PM
Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 16, 2015, 01:31:05 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Jun 16, 2015, 01:14:23 PM
Lol.

Also, it's really nothing new for films with mediocre or even terrible reviews to make a sh*t-ton of money. Someone already mentioned the Transformers movies.

They got bad reviews ;)

Plus after the garbage that was 'Kingsman'  ::) I won't hold my breath.

Exactly and yet they still made a shit load of money. So why is it hard for you to contemplate that a long awaited and much anticipated sequel to a beloved and cherished film for a generation who may now have kids of their own and is getting decent reviews is making good money. Sure nobody it expected it to do this well but i think it was nailed on it was going to make loads of money regardless. And you keep going on about how its getting terrible reviews but it isnt. Sure there are plenty of bad reviews but theyre far out numbered by the good ones.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Jun 16, 2015, 03:28:42 PM
New Jurassic World concept art

http://www.comingsoon.net/movies/news/450899-new-jurassic-world-concept-art
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: x-M-x on Jun 16, 2015, 06:09:17 PM
They really should have called this ' Jurassic Park 4' not  Jurassic World.... it wasn't set outside of the island or around the world.... it was still in a newly formed park lol...

Seeing the Classic T-rex from the first movie was the best.

(Those scars)



Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Jun 16, 2015, 06:13:13 PM
Quote from: Keg on Jun 16, 2015, 02:13:29 PM
Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 16, 2015, 01:31:05 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Jun 16, 2015, 01:14:23 PM
Lol.

Also, it's really nothing new for films with mediocre or even terrible reviews to make a sh*t-ton of money. Someone already mentioned the Transformers movies.

They got bad reviews ;)

Plus after the garbage that was 'Kingsman'  ::) I won't hold my breath.

Exactly and yet they still made a shit load of money. So why is it hard for you to contemplate that a long awaited and much anticipated sequel to a beloved and cherished film for a generation who may now have kids of their own and is getting decent reviews is making good money. Sure nobody it expected it to do this well but i think it was nailed on it was going to make loads of money regardless. And you keep going on about how its getting terrible reviews but it isnt. Sure there are plenty of bad reviews but theyre far out numbered by the good ones.

That's your reason right there, I don't think it will stand the test of time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 16, 2015, 06:17:10 PM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on Jun 16, 2015, 03:28:42 PM
New Jurassic World concept art

http://www.comingsoon.net/movies/news/450899-new-jurassic-world-concept-art

I'd like to point out that two of those use the Papo Running Rex as a model.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Keg on Jun 16, 2015, 06:24:37 PM
Hubbs standing the test of time has no bearing on how much the film makes initially in cinemas and your point has been that your surprised its making this kind of money. Youre just changing what you were originally trying to say to suit whatever people are saying back to you. Its tiresome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Jun 16, 2015, 06:55:46 PM
Quote from: Keg on Jun 16, 2015, 06:24:37 PM
Hubbs standing the test of time has no bearing on how much the film makes initially in cinemas and your point has been that your surprised its making this kind of money. Youre just changing what you were originally trying to say to suit whatever people are saying back to you. Its tiresome.

All I have said is, I am very surprised at well the movie has done, didn't see it coming at all. I'm more surprised because most reviews I've read or seen are very average. But I believe its because many folk are very nostalgic for the franchise (as mentioned) and have gone to see it mainly for that, the brand name has hooked people.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 16, 2015, 07:11:09 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 16, 2015, 12:42:15 PMEveryone needs a house to live in. And yes, I can fault the proprietor because he's the one who hired the engineer. He should've known what kind of service he was paying for.
...but the proprietor, being human, is not omniscient -- thus would not be realistically be able to know something's up with the engineer. It's a faulty logic going on here, both because of this and because you can give fault to an endless chain. I can fault the Costa Rican government for giving Hammond the island (should've known what kind of things he wanted to do with the island); I can blame whoever elected the Costa Rican government (should've known that they would've sold the island to yadda yadda yadda); and so on and so forth. It's utter, blatant nonsense.



Regarding the feather discussion, Vertigo is entirely correct. Not only was the feather theory not widely accepted in those times, but digital effects were at the pioneering stage, especially for A. live-action integration (meaning that the CGI effects are integrated into a real environment and thus have to be photoreal -- i.e. not TRON) and B. living things. They had to invent to do it because no one had done it before. It was not puppetry or stop-motion, techniques with generations of knowledge beforehand. CGI was new. You know what CGI had been really good at before Jurassic Park? Liquids and fluids (The Abyss and Terminator 2), small touch-ups (Alien3), and that's it.

Jurassic Park was the first film to portray fully digital living creatures in a live-action environment. Having them scaly and not feathered rendered the animation not only simpler but basically possible for the time. Had they wanted to make them feathered, they would have had to engineer specific programs to grow and animate feathers, to render and animate them convincingly, and to solve problems such as overlapping; but the truth is, they would have looked like poop no matter the effort.

Feathers are no different to fur, digital effects-wise: they are elements that react both individually and as a mass, and adhere to the body a certain way. Not only that, but light partially passes through their individual structures, creating specific appearences and making them very difficult to light without looking opaque (thus unreal). Levels of transparency and the manners in which light reacts with feathers and fur are still fields of research in digital effects!

90s attempts at fur were honest efforts, but quite awful. Relic hid them effectively by having the creature move in the darkness whenever it was digital (except the finale, but the fur had burned by then); but films like An American Werewolf in Paris aren't fondly remembered for their effects, and for good reason. Even in its time it was f**king derided for its effects. I can't even remember the first actually convincing renderings of fur and feathers (The Two Towers?) but they certainly weren't in the 90s.

The Jurassic Park digital dinosaurs still hold up (mostly) and part of the reason for that is because the only parts that need layers of transparency (eyes, teeth, certain soft tissue portions in the mouth) are never seen in big detail, or are lit a certain way to hide their flaws. Their bodies are overall bluntly opaque. Species (2 years after Jurassic Park) attempted to have a digital creature with layers of transparency, and failed miserably (to Giger himself's dismay -- there's an entire article on him dissing the digital effects of the film). So yes, it is entirely understandable that the makers of Jurassic Park's digital effects did not want further problems with their creations -- problems far too massive for pioneers like them.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 16, 2015, 07:19:15 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jun 16, 2015, 01:34:12 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 16, 2015, 11:35:11 AM
Vertigo: http://nerdist.com/the-public-is-ready-to-see-dinosaurs-with-feathers/

QuoteYou won't see feathers on any dinosaur in Jurassic World. And though there are good reasons for this, the public is ready to see fluffy velociraptors and T. rex. We need to see them.

Mm. I don't like the fuzzy JW raptor photoshops, but the Alexey Monzhaley sketch looks pretty good.

I think the thing to take away, and probably the reason for the 'no-feathers' outlook in the first place, is that it's harder than the old scalies to make them look accurate, cool and menacing. Not impossible, but a dramatically increased challenge. I'm sure Crash McCreery wouldn't have any difficulty with that, but I really don't know if JW's team could have done it.

A few other accurate (ish) dromie designs that might fit the bill

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg05.deviantart.net%2Fe758%2Fi%2F2011%2F302%2F1%2Fa%2Futahraptor_by_monopteryx-d4eb8f3.jpg&hash=107f55ac583459cb888671e30b631c089c0ac57e)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Forig09.deviantart.net%2F42b8%2Ff%2F2011%2F248%2Ff%2F6%2Futahraptor_v2_by_steveoc86-d48ytii.jpg&hash=dec6c02782f1829fbd43f09f516bd4a5702516d2)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg02.deviantart.net%2F92aa%2Fi%2F2014%2F248%2Fb%2F9%2Fdeinonychus_version_2_by_steveoc86-dzxqwu.png&hash=1879d557af7f8214aa77336eb3bf874bb48e6691)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fpre00.deviantart.net%2F8e9f%2Fth%2Fpre%2Ff%2F2012%2F361%2Fe%2F8%2Fachillobator_giganticus_by_teratophoneus-d5pbo7a.jpg&hash=b484a37887b5d7cd976f6a85420f97d8478a3ee8)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg07.deviantart.net%2F08da%2Fi%2F2012%2F036%2F2%2F0%2Futahraptor_ostrommaysorum_by_teratophoneus-d4oq7xm.jpg&hash=73d2afe193a1d71a190134325eadf21388b49d0f)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F40.media.tumblr.com%2F46ee15f6ccbf60ac06a23a1581f7909c%2Ftumblr_mknjznrQsv1r38ji3o1_1280.jpg&hash=132384190a98b029b82b68b8b0dcfed43f237493)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fboards.420chan.org%2Fdino%2Fsrc%2F1414455196018.jpg&hash=0f2ef26d19118db9cf15bc7eff1cbdcfa3876ce5)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fpre07.deviantart.net%2F325f%2Fth%2Fpre%2Ff%2F2010%2F327%2F4%2F8%2Fdeinonychus_by_monopteryx-d33gp55.jpg&hash=20670754d790dd809ab753276a39424dfb52394a)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2Fthumb%2Fc%2Fc3%2FUtahraptor_ostrommaysorum.png%2F800px-Utahraptor_ostrommaysorum.png&hash=3798c4a0c4cd13363331af907d9d3a47be6f04b6)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.khoahoc.tv%2Fphotos%2Fimage%2F2009%2F12%2F15%2Fdeinonychus-size-0x0-znd.jpg&hash=8278063a2ef83a8306f5525b07573421625aba2a)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Forig08.deviantart.net%2Fb370%2Ff%2F2012%2F078%2F2%2Fb%2Ftenontosaurus_vs_deinonychus_by_dustdevil-d4t8x1i.jpg&hash=a404632af76c96349426d998c47c07d9cb1fc2a2)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FoSkMOON.jpg&hash=18a0eca3584794ffc86389c1a72b0a73183fc2a4)
[close]

Although the series was crap, I think some of Terra Nova's feathered dinosaurs were pretty good (although many of the creatures were fictitious species)

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1309.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fs625%2Fatacamadesert86%2Fn50e1c92836e8f_zpsjztcoo0v.jpg&hash=a31a16dc777f5d3e86c6666577f756b4dfda89c8)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1309.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fs625%2Fatacamadesert86%2FTnova4_zpsgt8znimk.png&hash=474b87cff984b376dccca8e48a7e8193e327da80)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1309.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fs625%2Fatacamadesert86%2FSlasherJosh_zps0eumneaw.png&hash=8672eada30e073064fa8013d17e723844ce47b1a)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 16, 2015, 07:26:37 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jun 16, 2015, 01:34:12 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 16, 2015, 11:35:11 AM
Vertigo: http://nerdist.com/the-public-is-ready-to-see-dinosaurs-with-feathers/

QuoteYou won't see feathers on any dinosaur in Jurassic World. And though there are good reasons for this, the public is ready to see fluffy velociraptors and T. rex. We need to see them.

Mm. I don't like the fuzzy JW raptor photoshops, but the Alexey Monzhaley sketch looks pretty good.

I think the thing to take away, and probably the reason for the 'no-feathers' outlook in the first place, is that it's harder than the old scalies to make them look accurate, cool and menacing. Not impossible, but a dramatically increased challenge. I'm sure Crash McCreery wouldn't have any difficulty with that, but I really don't know if JW's team could have done it.

A few other accurate (ish) dromie designs that might fit the bill

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg05.deviantart.net%2Fe758%2Fi%2F2011%2F302%2F1%2Fa%2Futahraptor_by_monopteryx-d4eb8f3.jpg&hash=107f55ac583459cb888671e30b631c089c0ac57e)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Forig09.deviantart.net%2F42b8%2Ff%2F2011%2F248%2Ff%2F6%2Futahraptor_v2_by_steveoc86-d48ytii.jpg&hash=dec6c02782f1829fbd43f09f516bd4a5702516d2)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg02.deviantart.net%2F92aa%2Fi%2F2014%2F248%2Fb%2F9%2Fdeinonychus_version_2_by_steveoc86-dzxqwu.png&hash=1879d557af7f8214aa77336eb3bf874bb48e6691)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fpre00.deviantart.net%2F8e9f%2Fth%2Fpre%2Ff%2F2012%2F361%2Fe%2F8%2Fachillobator_giganticus_by_teratophoneus-d5pbo7a.jpg&hash=b484a37887b5d7cd976f6a85420f97d8478a3ee8)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg07.deviantart.net%2F08da%2Fi%2F2012%2F036%2F2%2F0%2Futahraptor_ostrommaysorum_by_teratophoneus-d4oq7xm.jpg&hash=73d2afe193a1d71a190134325eadf21388b49d0f)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F40.media.tumblr.com%2F46ee15f6ccbf60ac06a23a1581f7909c%2Ftumblr_mknjznrQsv1r38ji3o1_1280.jpg&hash=132384190a98b029b82b68b8b0dcfed43f237493)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fboards.420chan.org%2Fdino%2Fsrc%2F1414455196018.jpg&hash=0f2ef26d19118db9cf15bc7eff1cbdcfa3876ce5)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fpre07.deviantart.net%2F325f%2Fth%2Fpre%2Ff%2F2010%2F327%2F4%2F8%2Fdeinonychus_by_monopteryx-d33gp55.jpg&hash=20670754d790dd809ab753276a39424dfb52394a)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2Fthumb%2Fc%2Fc3%2FUtahraptor_ostrommaysorum.png%2F800px-Utahraptor_ostrommaysorum.png&hash=3798c4a0c4cd13363331af907d9d3a47be6f04b6)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.khoahoc.tv%2Fphotos%2Fimage%2F2009%2F12%2F15%2Fdeinonychus-size-0x0-znd.jpg&hash=8278063a2ef83a8306f5525b07573421625aba2a)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Forig08.deviantart.net%2Fb370%2Ff%2F2012%2F078%2F2%2Fb%2Ftenontosaurus_vs_deinonychus_by_dustdevil-d4t8x1i.jpg&hash=a404632af76c96349426d998c47c07d9cb1fc2a2)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FoSkMOON.jpg&hash=18a0eca3584794ffc86389c1a72b0a73183fc2a4)
[close]

I think those are the first feathered dino concepts I've seen that aren't garish as hell.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomorphine on Jun 16, 2015, 08:02:38 PM
Those pictures (while technically proficient) still make the creatures look God awful, IMO... If there is ever a film with furry/feathered dinosaurs in it, I know I won't be able to take it the least bit seriously.

Dinosaurs will always look better with a draconian/reptilian aesthetic.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 16, 2015, 01:42:57 PM
Park security was one aspect of it. They could never have controlled something they didn't fully understand even if that hadn't happened.

Aside from the issue with the poisonous plants, they already must have been controlling things well before Grant and co showed up. The dinosaurs are all adults. Any trial-and-error would have mostly been done by then.

Besides, it was less of a zoo and more of a nature preserve with strategically-placed windows. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PRI. HUDSON on Jun 16, 2015, 08:09:50 PM
8/10, gonna break the all-time box office record, haters gonna hate
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 16, 2015, 08:11:19 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mn95gq4Hlo
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomorphine on Jun 16, 2015, 08:20:33 PM
That last quote will probably turn out to be true. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 16, 2015, 08:41:02 PM
Bryce Dallas Howard's legs are pretty intense.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PRI. HUDSON on Jun 16, 2015, 09:51:43 PM
Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 16, 2015, 08:41:02 PM
Bryce Dallas Howard's legs are pretty intense.

I'd walk through that strawberry field.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 16, 2015, 10:02:51 PM
Quote from: x-M-x on Jun 16, 2015, 06:09:17 PM
They really should have called this ' Jurassic Park 4' not  Jurassic World.... it wasn't set outside of the island or around the world.... it was still in a newly formed park lol...

Seeing the Classic T-rex from the first movie was the best.

(Those scars)


They gave this title for the new trilogy for reason, Trevor stated this, and gave away some hint about a dinos ruled earth sequel too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Plokoon111 on Jun 16, 2015, 10:29:05 PM
Spoiler
I really enjoyed the petting zoo part, it was so cute and I would totally be in there if it was real haha. I almost got a panicked when one of the flying predators grabbed the triceratops, but luckily it fell down.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 16, 2015, 10:31:03 PM
Quote from: Xenomorphine on Jun 16, 2015, 08:02:38 PM
Those pictures (while technically proficient) still make the creatures look God awful, IMO... If there is ever a film with furry/feathered dinosaurs in it, I know I won't be able to take it the least bit seriously.

Dinosaurs will always look better with a draconian/reptilian aesthetic.

Well to each their own, but this one, at least, looks every bit as menacing as the JW raptors to me, if not more so.

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg05.deviantart.net%2Fe758%2Fi%2F2011%2F302%2F1%2Fa%2Futahraptor_by_monopteryx-d4eb8f3.jpg&hash=107f55ac583459cb888671e30b631c089c0ac57e)

Compared with the original JP concept.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs14.postimg.org%2Fl2cayk49d%2Feqx3_D.jpg&hash=ca1bb14b1e061f686e8553b1e51b423eccf1d38c)
[close]

For 100% authenticity it should really have pennaceous arm/hand feathers, but I think artistic licence is just as fair to keep them wingless (and I'd clip off the tail fan too) as it was to give JP's raptors lips, eyebrow ridges and big eyes with slit pupils.

Imagine that in a dark colour, or jet black. It's basically like a big, agile, predatory bear from hell.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Keg on Jun 16, 2015, 11:18:44 PM
Accurate or not, my whole life since I was a toddler before i'd even seen the first film, ive pictured dinosaurs a certain way. Suddenly seeing them with feathers just doesn't look or feel right to me as im sure is the case with many people even though they know it to be inaccurate. Same way I know Dilophosaurs didnt have frills and Velociraptors were the size of a large turkey. Hey at least this film actually addresses that for the purists I suppose.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 16, 2015, 11:20:19 PM
Kevin FeigeVerified account
‏@Kevfeige

Congrats Mr. Spielberg @UniversalPics @Legendary @LeDoctor @colintrevorrow and especially @prattprattpratt

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CHo0m8yWcAERieO.jpg:large)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 16, 2015, 11:33:51 PM
Quote from: Xenomorphine on Jun 16, 2015, 08:02:38 PM
Those pictures (while technically proficient) still make the creatures look God awful, IMO... If there is ever a film with furry/feathered dinosaurs in it, I know I won't be able to take it the least bit seriously.

Dinosaurs will always look better with a draconian/reptilian aesthetic.

Why? You'd likely change your mind as soon as you see one of them ripping a human apart.

Quote from: Xenomorphine on Jun 16, 2015, 08:02:38 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 16, 2015, 01:42:57 PM
Park security was one aspect of it. They could never have controlled something they didn't fully understand even if that hadn't happened.

Aside from the issue with the poisonous plants, they already must have been controlling things well before Grant and co showed up. The dinosaurs are all adults. Any trial-and-error would have mostly been done by then.

Besides, it was less of a zoo and more of a nature preserve with strategically-placed windows. :)

And in the novel, all that planning goes to shit once Malcolm arrives on the island and right away, spots problems like the population numbers growing.

Quote from: Omegazilla on Jun 16, 2015, 07:11:09 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 16, 2015, 12:42:15 PMEveryone needs a house to live in. And yes, I can fault the proprietor because he's the one who hired the engineer. He should've known what kind of service he was paying for.
...but the proprietor, being human, is not omniscient -- thus would not be realistically be able to know something's up with the engineer. It's a faulty logic going on here, both because of this and because you can give fault to an endless chain. I can fault the Costa Rican government for giving Hammond the island (should've known what kind of things he wanted to do with the island); I can blame whoever elected the Costa Rican government (should've known that they would've sold the island to yadda yadda yadda); and so on and so forth. It's utter, blatant nonsense.


Slippery slope. The human knows exactly what goes into building a house. That's why people study engineering and construction. The only room for error is a result of cost-cutting and shortcuts. But what do you study about an extinct ecosystem? Sure, you can hypothesize, theorize, all that jazz, but when it comes to recreating it, you can't possibly hope to replicate it for the simple reason that it's impossible. Human error lies not in the design, but in the idea.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 16, 2015, 11:56:43 PM
Quote from: Keg on Jun 16, 2015, 11:18:44 PM
Accurate or not, my whole life since I was a toddler before i'd even seen the first film, ive pictured dinosaurs a certain way. Suddenly seeing them with feathers just doesn't look or feel right to me as im sure is the case with many people even though they know it to be inaccurate. Same way I know Dilophosaurs didnt have frills and Velociraptors were the size of a large turkey. Hey at least this film actually addresses that for the purists I suppose.

Well, think about how it was for people who saw Jurassic Park expecting to see Tyrannosaurus standing vertically with its tail dragging along the floor, waddling slowly and stupidly after its constantly-tripping-over victims. You might be thinking "those old ones were lame, these new horizontal fastosaurs are so much more badass", but there were a lot of people who liked to see dinosaurs as symbols of the march of progress, towering brutes destined to be outmoded by agile mammalian superiority.

Public perception of dinosaurs is moulded by what cinema throws at us - before The Land Before Time and Jurassic Park, the popular image was formed from The Land That Time Forgot and One Million Years BC, an image that was as outdated as ours is today.
Imagine how bad our perception of dinosaurs could be if Jurassic Park had never existed. That's the value of these films.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 17, 2015, 12:34:01 AM
For the anti-feather crowd, what is it about the inclusion of the newer science that bothers you so much? Xenomorphine, you said they wouldn't look scary. I challenge that. Have you seen newer dino docs that feature feathered dromaeosaurids? They look fantastic!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 17, 2015, 12:46:11 AM
Gigantic feathered beasts would have been terrifying. Even if they were only 4 feet high. :P

Never the less Jurrasic Park is fiction. Not much is factual about the movie. Feathers or not they went with featherless because raptors are cute enough as it is.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Jun 17, 2015, 12:59:30 AM
Saw it twice over the weekend.

I love this movie, it's so fun. My review is up on my site, I'd really appreciate if you all checked it out.

Definitely glad this movie was as fun as it was. The original is still better, obviously.

So glad it made as much as it did.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PRI. HUDSON on Jun 17, 2015, 01:23:37 AM
I felt like I was 8 years old again while watching this film. I was giddy like a girl.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 17, 2015, 01:45:12 AM
From a cg aspect one thing that kept bugging me was the eyes/teeth of the raptors -- just didn't look fully rendered.  All the other dinos looked fine in that aspect.

___

Already got blu ray packaging deals:

Spoiler


#JurassicWorldVerified account
‏@JurassicPark

Non-stop action is around the corner. Bring home the battle & pre-order #JurassicWorld today: http://uni.pictures/W3ndjG 

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CHqbziiWoAAWiKx.jpg:large)

[close]

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 17, 2015, 06:16:22 AM
Gonna wait for photos of the finished product this time, hehe.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: noname on Jun 17, 2015, 07:02:04 AM
I heard that the t-rex from JW looked very different from the previous JP movies, could anyone tell me if that is true?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 17, 2015, 07:12:57 AM
The thing looked stretched when compared to its original incarnation. Especially the snout. Eyes looked puppy-like at times.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Jun 17, 2015, 08:45:39 AM
Quote from: Omegamorph on Jun 17, 2015, 07:12:57 AM
The thing looked stretched when compared to its original incarnation. Especially the snout. Eyes looked puppy-like at times.

I think it were the eyes, they seemed bigger and more yellow then the previous movie, the skin (slight) difference etc, is believable due to age progress.
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FsH4RnWu.png&hash=a02fb2b19f014f148d26faf6a91b91fc83707810)
[close]

I personally thought it looked good in day light though
Spoiler
(https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/hphotos-xaf1/t51.2885-15/s320x320/e15/11351584_1443354505969288_2077799935_n.jpg)
[close]

Quote from: ace3g on Jun 17, 2015, 01:45:12 AM
From a cg aspect one thing that kept bugging me was the eyes/teeth of the raptors -- just didn't look fully rendered.  All the other dinos looked fine in that aspect.

___

Already got blu ray packaging deals:

Spoiler


#JurassicWorldVerified account
‏@JurassicPark

Non-stop action is around the corner. Bring home the battle & pre-order #JurassicWorld today: http://uni.pictures/W3ndjG 

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CHqbziiWoAAWiKx.jpg:large)

[close]

LOVE it, must have, although I really hope they change the T-rex's skin color, looks too caramel lol.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 17, 2015, 09:31:15 AM
Yeah I do like the render but you can see how the snout has different proportions. Some other things are different too. It's not just a sculptural refinement so the differences are more marked between this and JP than they are between JP and TLW. Only that this is supposed to be the same Tyrannosaurus as in the first movie. Most probably the intention was to show its age -- certain animals become slightly different as they get older, certain do not, even in the same species.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Jun 17, 2015, 09:32:53 AM
Quote from: Omegamorph on Jun 17, 2015, 09:31:15 AM
Yeah I do like the render but you can see how the snout has different proportions. Some other things are different too. It's not just a sculptural refinement so the differences are more marked between this and JP than they are between JP and TLW. Only that this is supposed to be the same Tyrannosaurus as in the first movie. Most probably the intention was to show its age -- certain animals become slightly different as they get older, certain do not, even in the same species.


I felt the snout looked different in certain points of view as well, nontheless it was amazing to see it on screen again and hear it roar!

In daylight it felt believable it was the same rex, it was kinda difficult to see (skinwise) at night scenes, hence why there was more focus on other points like the snout and eyes. 

edit: They released a tv spot in light of the biggest opening of all time (includes major spoilers for those who havent seen it yet:
Spoiler
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBET2EA4ji0
[close]
They shouldn't have added the T rex roar in the 1st half of it though...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 17, 2015, 11:32:44 AM
http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/movies/2015/06/16/jurassic-world-sexism-bryce-dallas-howard/28811873/

QuoteLike so, so many of you, I bought a ticket to see Jurassic World this past week. I went for the dinosaur fights. I went to see America's new favorite movie star, Chris Pratt, in action. I went to recapture that feeling I had when I saw the original as a child.

Unfortunately, I walked out of the theater not with the sense of wonder and amazement Jurassic Park gave my 10-year-old self, but instead with a familiar mix of anger and depression that Hollywood had churned out yet another aggressively sexist blockbuster.

Holy Christ, this has become ludicrous.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 17, 2015, 11:33:14 AM
Concerning the Rex I think they did a damn good job. I admit an animatronic would have been welcomed but its not a huge loss.

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi59.tinypic.com%2F2s926nd.jpg&hash=102e6f817f4d56b326011580f5afd1933f86d8a1)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 17, 2015, 11:39:34 AM
Thanks for the comparison shot. I still think there's something off, but a good part of it is due to the lighting.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 17, 2015, 11:45:14 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 17, 2015, 11:33:14 AM
Concerning the Rex I think they did a damn good job. I admit an animatronic would have been welcomed but its not a huge loss.

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi59.tinypic.com%2F2s926nd.jpg&hash=102e6f817f4d56b326011580f5afd1933f86d8a1)
[close]

I don't know, the head looks a bit off. It looks like the lower jaw on the JW Rex is a little more robust. The arms look like they were placed differently.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jun 17, 2015, 11:56:38 AM
Regardless of how good or bad the CGI was in the new film, I think we can all agree Stan Winston is sorely missed :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 17, 2015, 11:59:37 AM
Well, yeah.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 17, 2015, 12:17:54 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 17, 2015, 11:45:14 AM
I don't know, the head looks a bit off. It looks like the lower jaw on the JW Rex is a little more robust. The arms look like they were placed differently.

She got older. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 17, 2015, 12:19:40 PM
That doesn't account for arm displacement. But whatever, I'll accept it because she was the best looking dinosaur in the film, even scientifically speaking (and even that's comparatively speaking).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Jun 17, 2015, 12:24:21 PM
the eyes are all wrong, sometimes looked like they pop out like one of those stress toys

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjpencyclopedia%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F07%2Fpanicpete.png&hash=8e7d942da2e08c5670c60959d3dc6c471adaf9c5)
[close]

plus it's cross eyed.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: That Yellow Alien on Jun 17, 2015, 01:32:52 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 17, 2015, 11:32:44 AM
http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/movies/2015/06/16/jurassic-world-sexism-bryce-dallas-howard/28811873/

QuoteLike so, so many of you, I bought a ticket to see Jurassic World this past week. I went for the dinosaur fights. I went to see America's new favorite movie star, Chris Pratt, in action. I went to recapture that feeling I had when I saw the original as a child.

Unfortunately, I walked out of the theater not with the sense of wonder and amazement Jurassic Park gave my 10-year-old self, but instead with a familiar mix of anger and depression that Hollywood had churned out yet another aggressively sexist blockbuster.

Holy Christ, this has become ludicrous.

That article is garbage.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: noname on Jun 17, 2015, 01:42:44 PM
Judging by the trailer and some of the screen shots that was provided here, she looks the same. I was kind of worried that they altered it but I'm glad it looks very similar to the predecessor. Cant wait to see it this week. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 17, 2015, 03:08:25 PM
Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Jun 17, 2015, 01:32:52 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 17, 2015, 11:32:44 AM
http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/movies/2015/06/16/jurassic-world-sexism-bryce-dallas-howard/28811873/

QuoteLike so, so many of you, I bought a ticket to see Jurassic World this past week. I went for the dinosaur fights. I went to see America's new favorite movie star, Chris Pratt, in action. I went to recapture that feeling I had when I saw the original as a child.

Unfortunately, I walked out of the theater not with the sense of wonder and amazement Jurassic Park gave my 10-year-old self, but instead with a familiar mix of anger and depression that Hollywood had churned out yet another aggressively sexist blockbuster.

Holy Christ, this has become ludicrous.

That article is garbage.

Lol yeah it is. BDH actually became a string female lead as the movie went on and she was the one that had the most development. And a female finally dying in a Jurassic Park movie? That's equality, isn't it?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomorphine on Jun 17, 2015, 03:51:58 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jun 16, 2015, 10:31:03 PM
Imagine that in a dark colour, or jet black. It's basically like a big, agile, predatory bear from hell.

Eh... It's honestly not really doing anything for me.

I do actually favour scientific accuracy for films, in general, but in terms of whether an aesthetic 'feels' good, furry/feathered dinosaurs underwhelm me.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 16, 2015, 11:33:51 PM
Why? You'd likely change your mind as soon as you see one of them ripping a human apart.

No, for the same reason as the 'King Kong' remake didn't thrill me.

Did the special effects which went into making Kong look realistic, seem impressive as hell? Of course. The motion, fur and so forth... from a technical point of view, that was very impressive, but when it was rampaging around the island or New York, I felt indifferent about it. It was as realistic as we've ever got to a gigantic ape, but... It's still just an ape. A gorilla can rip your arms off, just like a lion can mess you up, too - but I'm just not interested in looking at a big ole' monkey or big cat on the big screen.

The giant insects, man-eating maggot things, traditional reptilian dinosaurs and stuff like that? Yeah! Kong? Nope... I could sympathise with Kong's eventual situation, but that's about all.

It's one of the reasons I thought they should have changed it from an ape to a dragon - at least the whole 'bond with the sacrificial maiden' part would have had some mythological resonance. :)

So, no. If I saw furry/feathered dinosaurs ripping someone apart, it wouldn't instantly make me a fan of that aesthetic. A part of me would just be thinking, "Shame they don't look like they did in the first film..."

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 17, 2015, 12:34:01 AM
For the anti-feather crowd, what is it about the inclusion of the newer science that bothers you so much? Xenomorphine, you said they wouldn't look scary. I challenge that. Have you seen newer dino docs that feature feathered dromaeosaurids? They look fantastic!

I'm not bothered about it. I just don't think it looks as impressive. It's just a personal artistic preference.

Dragons > birds. :)

Documentaries and art can always look technically impressive, but the actual furry/feathered dinosaurs portrayals, themselves... I've never seen one where I've thought, "That looks awesome." At best, they trigger a 'meh' and shrug of shoulders.

A hairy mammoth could probably do a lot of damage, too. When elephants are in 'musk' they can kill you. But would I want to go and watch a film about an elephant rampage? Not really...

Same reason why a film about a killer Great White or giant squid will instantly get people interested, but you'd need to work extra hard on the marketing if it's about a rogue Killer Whale. Orcas can technically be tremendously dangerous, but most people will prefer to see a film about one of the first two, instead.

Most will sit down and watch 'Jaws'. Not as many will want to sit down and watch a production of 'Moby Dick'. Sharks look and feel psychologically nightmarish and dangerous, whereas whales just don't generally trigger that response.

Something which looks like a gigantic dragon/crocodile will always do the same, versus a giant feathery bird/furry bear.

Doesn't mean it's impossible to do (I didn't think I'd like the new 'Planet Of The Apes' stuff, but I did), just that non-mammalian/avian stuff will always be an easier sell, horror/action-wise.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 17, 2015, 11:32:44 AM
Holy Christ, this has become ludicrous.

Yep. So many bizarre reviews filled with utter bullshit about how it supposedly revolves around the female lead being some sexist 1950s stereotype. Yeah, if you haven't bothered to, like, watch it! She's the new Hammond, that's all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 17, 2015, 04:31:13 PM
I can't argue with your personal feelings so let's leave it there then. Good talk.

As for Howard, she's not the new Hammond. That's Khan's role.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 17, 2015, 07:38:24 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfAIO5hB6Ik
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 17, 2015, 08:09:06 PM
Quote from: Xenomorphine on Jun 17, 2015, 03:51:58 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jun 16, 2015, 10:31:03 PM
Imagine that in a dark colour, or jet black. It's basically like a big, agile, predatory bear from hell.

Eh... It's honestly not really doing anything for me.

I do actually favour scientific accuracy for films, in general, but in terms of whether an aesthetic 'feels' good, furry/feathered dinosaurs underwhelm me.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 16, 2015, 11:33:51 PM
Why? You'd likely change your mind as soon as you see one of them ripping a human apart.

No, for the same reason as the 'King Kong' remake didn't thrill me.

Did the special effects which went into making Kong look realistic, seem impressive as hell? Of course. The motion, fur and so forth... from a technical point of view, that was very impressive, but when it was rampaging around the island or New York, I felt indifferent about it. It was as realistic as we've ever got to a gigantic ape, but... It's still just an ape. A gorilla can rip your arms off, just like a lion can mess you up, too - but I'm just not interested in looking at a big ole' monkey or big cat on the big screen.

The giant insects, man-eating maggot things, traditional reptilian dinosaurs and stuff like that? Yeah! Kong? Nope... I could sympathise with Kong's eventual situation, but that's about all.

It's one of the reasons I thought they should have changed it from an ape to a dragon - at least the whole 'bond with the sacrificial maiden' part would have had some mythological resonance. :)

So, no. If I saw furry/feathered dinosaurs ripping someone apart, it wouldn't instantly make me a fan of that aesthetic. A part of me would just be thinking, "Shame they don't look like they did in the first film..."

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 17, 2015, 12:34:01 AM
For the anti-feather crowd, what is it about the inclusion of the newer science that bothers you so much? Xenomorphine, you said they wouldn't look scary. I challenge that. Have you seen newer dino docs that feature feathered dromaeosaurids? They look fantastic!

I'm not bothered about it. I just don't think it looks as impressive. It's just a personal artistic preference.

Dragons > birds. :)

Documentaries and art can always look technically impressive, but the actual furry/feathered dinosaurs portrayals, themselves... I've never seen one where I've thought, "That looks awesome." At best, they trigger a 'meh' and shrug of shoulders.

A hairy mammoth could probably do a lot of damage, too. When elephants are in 'musk' they can kill you. But would I want to go and watch a film about an elephant rampage? Not really...

Same reason why a film about a killer Great White or giant squid will instantly get people interested, but you'd need to work extra hard on the marketing if it's about a rogue Killer Whale. Orcas can technically be tremendously dangerous, but most people will prefer to see a film about one of the first two, instead.

Most will sit down and watch 'Jaws'. Not as many will want to sit down and watch a production of 'Moby Dick'. Sharks look and feel psychologically nightmarish and dangerous, whereas whales just don't generally trigger that response.

Something which looks like a gigantic dragon/crocodile will always do the same, versus a giant feathery bird/furry bear.

Doesn't mean it's impossible to do (I didn't think I'd like the new 'Planet Of The Apes' stuff, but I did), just that non-mammalian/avian stuff will always be an easier sell, horror/action-wise.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 17, 2015, 11:32:44 AM
Holy Christ, this has become ludicrous.

Yep. So many bizarre reviews filled with utter bullshit about how it supposedly revolves around the female lead being some sexist 1950s stereotype. Yeah, if you haven't bothered to, like, watch it! She's the new Hammond, that's all.

100% agreed!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: chrisr232007 on Jun 17, 2015, 08:37:24 PM
I dont care what the haters are saying this movie was amazing.  I think it rates right behind the first movie.  I felt like I was 8 years old again!!!  That final fight was off the charts amazing and my heart was racing when T-Rex came to play!  Everything people are crying about when it comes to this movies is so stupid.  It was the movie I been waiting for since 93' and I cant now wait to see where they take the next movie to!!!  Also I was wanting Chris's character to say to Blue after the final fight...' Your my boy blue!" even though I think he was a girl raptor haha.  The movie had everything I wanted in it and plus so much more, I say its a 9/10 which the first being a 10/10. 
Title: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Jun 17, 2015, 09:06:04 PM
I just saw the movie and while I enjoyed the basic plot, I felt the film rushed over some of the finer details of the movie such as character personalities and development which I felt were too cliched for a movie made in 2015.

Spoiler
I also don't understand why the pteranodons attacked humans since they are fish eaters.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: judge death on Jun 17, 2015, 09:49:13 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Jun 17, 2015, 11:56:38 AM
Regardless of how good or bad the CGI was in the new film, I think we can all agree Stan Winston is sorely missed :(
If he and his team were involved I´m sure we would had gotten way better dino effects and less CGI stuff which to me ruined the movie a bit since it failed to impress me but I did like the few animatronics they used but most were CGI :/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Jun 18, 2015, 05:39:39 AM
Spoiler
That ending.

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FPaAZiSj.gif&hash=ca0bcd810565f8970716881f6d1c505315bd0c19)
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 18, 2015, 08:51:06 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Jun 17, 2015, 09:06:04 PM
I just saw the movie and while I enjoyed the basic plot, I felt the film rushed over some of the finer details of the movie such as character personalities and development which I felt were too cliched for a movie made in 2015.

Spoiler
I also don't understand why the pteranodons attacked humans since they are fish eaters.
[close]

Spoiler

The I-Rex commanded them to attack. That's what everyone seems to be missing about this movie, but that can also make the animal even more ridiculous.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Jun 18, 2015, 11:51:20 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 18, 2015, 08:51:06 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Jun 17, 2015, 09:06:04 PM
I just saw the movie and while I enjoyed the basic plot, I felt the film rushed over some of the finer details of the movie such as character personalities and development which I felt were too cliched for a movie made in 2015.

Spoiler
I also don't understand why the pteranodons attacked humans since they are fish eaters.
[close]

Spoiler

The I-Rex commanded them to attack. That's what everyone seems to be missing about this movie, but that can also make the animal even more ridiculous.
[close]
Spoiler
She didn't command them, she just scared them out of the aviary.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 18, 2015, 11:56:39 AM
Quote from: Gilfryd on Jun 18, 2015, 05:39:39 AM
Spoiler
That ending.

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FPaAZiSj.gif&hash=ca0bcd810565f8970716881f6d1c505315bd0c19)
[close]
[close]

Yeah a lot of reviews quote that  :laugh: It's awesome though  8)

Quote from: Godzillakuj94 on Jun 18, 2015, 11:51:20 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 18, 2015, 08:51:06 AM
Quote from: predxeno on Jun 17, 2015, 09:06:04 PM
I just saw the movie and while I enjoyed the basic plot, I felt the film rushed over some of the finer details of the movie such as character personalities and development which I felt were too cliched for a movie made in 2015.

Spoiler
I also don't understand why the pteranodons attacked humans since they are fish eaters.
[close]

Spoiler

The I-Rex commanded them to attack. That's what everyone seems to be missing about this movie, but that can also make the animal even more ridiculous.
[close]
Spoiler
She didn't command them, she just scared them out of the aviary.
[close]

Yup.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 18, 2015, 11:58:43 AM
Bluray limited addition collectors set ...

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fmx1505w.jpg&hash=265575e904022e31cdcaa5a17b7d23447ef87e1d)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 18, 2015, 12:46:09 PM
If the actual product is as good as that prototype, I'm gonna pick it up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 18, 2015, 01:20:27 PM
I went for my fourth viewing last night in D-Box! Holy shit, if you can do it, DO IT. It's an insane experience.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 18, 2015, 03:04:14 PM
I hope you guys enjoyed the site.

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/envelope/cotown/la-et-ct-jurassic-world-fanboys-universal-masrani-20150617-story.html
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 18, 2015, 03:27:03 PM
Are you taking the site down?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 18, 2015, 03:30:04 PM
Not at all.

It's still alive. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 18, 2015, 03:35:25 PM
Ah, sweet. Congrats on the recognition and your rewards! They're well-deserved.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 18, 2015, 04:05:57 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 18, 2015, 03:35:25 PM
Ah, sweet. Congrats on the recognition and your rewards! They're well-deserved.

Cheers man.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 18, 2015, 04:19:34 PM
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markhughes/2015/06/18/jurassic-world-may-hit-1-billion-on-second-weekend/

QuoteAs the predictions roll in and we consider where the possible figures will fall, it's becoming increasingly obvious that we may see something incredible happening this weekend — Jurassic World just might hit $1 billion on only its second weekend of release.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PRI. HUDSON on Jun 18, 2015, 07:59:53 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 18, 2015, 04:19:34 PM
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markhughes/2015/06/18/jurassic-world-may-hit-1-billion-on-second-weekend/

QuoteAs the predictions roll in and we consider where the possible figures will fall, it's becoming increasingly obvious that we may see something incredible happening this weekend — Jurassic World just might hit $1 billion on only its second weekend of release.

I predicted it would after the first weekend since it was half way there in just a couple days.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jun 18, 2015, 09:49:56 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 18, 2015, 03:04:14 PM
I hope you guys enjoyed the site.

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/envelope/cotown/la-et-ct-jurassic-world-fanboys-universal-masrani-20150617-story.html

Congrats. You really deserved that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 18, 2015, 11:14:42 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 18, 2015, 03:04:14 PM
I hope you guys enjoyed the site.

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/envelope/cotown/la-et-ct-jurassic-world-fanboys-universal-masrani-20150617-story.html

Good job dude, and congratulations  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Snowdog on Jun 19, 2015, 01:38:05 AM
Legacy released a video of the practical apatosaurus.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfcqQf61S-k (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfcqQf61S-k)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Jun 19, 2015, 02:16:54 AM
Does anyone else think they should've use the practical raptor head for the muzzle scenes?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Jun 19, 2015, 02:24:53 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0viq4s_-hw

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PVTDukeMorrison on Jun 19, 2015, 03:41:23 AM
Quote from: Godzillakuj94 on Jun 19, 2015, 02:16:54 AM
Does anyone else think they should've use the practical raptor head for the muzzle scenes?
Didn't they?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 19, 2015, 05:26:15 AM
Many of the scenes actually could have employed practical effects.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jun 19, 2015, 07:19:26 AM
Quote from: Godzillakuj94 on Jun 19, 2015, 02:16:54 AM
Does anyone else think they should've use the practical raptor head for the muzzle scenes?

Did they not? I couldn't tell.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jun 19, 2015, 07:38:24 AM
No, all the shots of the raptors in the... head-clamps (how did they even get them into those?!) seemed to be CGI.

I was really disappointed there wasn't more practical, especially as the previous movies relied so heavily on it. But I guess that's just the way of the world these days.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 19, 2015, 07:44:34 AM
I think the raptor heads and Apatosaurus used animatronics with CG augmentation (particularly for the eyes and mouths, apparently).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jun 19, 2015, 09:43:57 AM
No Director's Cut (http://www.movie-censorship.com/news.php?ID=9119) coming.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Keg on Jun 19, 2015, 11:40:15 AM
Was anybody expecting one? No Jurassic Park film has had a Directors Cut.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Jun 19, 2015, 12:03:50 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Jun 19, 2015, 09:43:57 AM
No Director's Cut (http://www.movie-censorship.com/news.php?ID=9119) coming.

Well that article also explains why they cut the scene with the dino....droppings
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 19, 2015, 12:07:03 PM
Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 19, 2015, 02:24:53 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0viq4s_-hw

That was the most badass paleontologist I've ever seen. I love the dafuq look he keeps giving Hal.

On science, here's a neat write up on John Ostrom, one of the paleontologists whose work inspired the first novel. It talks about his meeting with Crichton.

http://news.yale.edu/2015/06/18/yale-s-legacy-jurassic-world
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 19, 2015, 12:13:07 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jun 19, 2015, 07:44:34 AM
I think the raptor heads and Apatosaurus used animatronics with CG augmentation (particularly for the eyes and mouths, apparently).
Apatosaurus head/neck was the only practical effect seen on the screen. Raptor heads were covered with digital Raptors.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jun 19, 2015, 12:45:41 PM
Well they did a damn good job, I thought. I couldn't tell at all. I kept wondering.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jun 19, 2015, 12:49:21 PM
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Jun 19, 2015, 12:45:41 PMWell they did a damn good job, I thought. I couldn't tell at all. I kept wondering.

Really? I thought the CGI was quite obvious.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jun 19, 2015, 12:53:44 PM
I didn't think so. Looked quite lifelike to me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jun 19, 2015, 12:54:49 PM
Oh it was very good. But I could still tell it was CGI rather than a puppet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Jun 19, 2015, 12:56:26 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Jun 19, 2015, 12:54:49 PM
Oh it was very good. But I could still tell it was CGI rather than a puppet.

I had my doubts with the Raptor heads, but I believe it was 50/50 (esp the eyes)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 19, 2015, 12:57:07 PM
The best thing about the CGI was the level of movement the animals possessed. That's what made them lifelike, IMO. They also had personalities.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 19, 2015, 01:59:03 PM
I thought JW's CG looked pretty good at the time (and as Doom mentioned, the animations are fantastic), but with all the Jurassic Park stills that've been popping up in threads since then.... those animatronics are very clearly right there during the filming. There's no "it's so good, it's almost like they're real" - in JP's stills, they are real. It's in the mud and water collecting between their scales, the lack of motion blur, and the total congruity of the lighting.

That's not to say all animatronics are better than all CG, I think JP3's Spinosaurus model looked lifeless. The CG shots of it injected far more character into the thing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: judge death on Jun 19, 2015, 02:01:20 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Jun 19, 2015, 12:54:49 PM
Oh it was very good. But I could still tell it was CGI rather than a puppet.
Amen to that, way too much CGI and it somewhat ruined the feeling for me since when I compare it to JP 1 or 2 which had practical effects seemed more real and epic than what I saw in this movie, but it is still a good movie and I liked it and the CGI is better than in many other movies of todays hollywood movies.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 19, 2015, 02:32:42 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jun 19, 2015, 01:59:03 PM
That's not to say all animatronics are better than all CG, I think JP3's Spinosaurus model looked lifeless. The CG shots of it injected far more character into the thing.

I daresay all the models in JP 3 looked lifeless. They were poorly filmed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 19, 2015, 04:53:47 PM
JP3's FX work both practical and digital was and is top notch.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 19, 2015, 05:42:23 PM
The animatronics were well-built but they looked awful in the movie. It was very obvious they were animatronics and didn't convince me they were real dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 19, 2015, 05:56:53 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jurassicworlduniverse.com%2Fwordpress%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F01%2Fjurassicpark3-03.jpg&hash=497aa119ee00047ed69a83855e29ef874b36e898)

How.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Jun 19, 2015, 06:18:12 PM
The raptors were fine but the way the spinosuarus was shot and how it moved was horrible, you can just tell that it was a giant robot.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BISHOP 93 on Jun 19, 2015, 07:56:37 PM
The t rex head was the most blatant at being lifeless in jp3 I think
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alienseseses on Jun 19, 2015, 08:07:35 PM
The T-Rex and Spinosaurus animatronics were stiff. The raptors were top notch. (Also, notice the smaller eyes.)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 19, 2015, 08:20:57 PM
Quote from: Omegamorph on Jun 19, 2015, 05:56:53 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jurassicworlduniverse.com%2Fwordpress%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F01%2Fjurassicpark3-03.jpg&hash=497aa119ee00047ed69a83855e29ef874b36e898)

How.

I just said they were well-built. I'm sure they're nice to look at in person. But upon filming, I don't know, it just felt...off.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jun 19, 2015, 09:04:00 PM
A question for those whom have seen the film:

Do you expect to see another Jurassic World film in the future?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 19, 2015, 09:20:23 PM
Considering a sequel has already been confirmed...yes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 19, 2015, 09:26:33 PM
It's pretty much inevitable when you look at the box office figures, but within the film, yes there are a few threads there seem to be intended for picking up in a sequel. It's not done attention-grabbingly though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PRI. HUDSON on Jun 19, 2015, 09:31:27 PM
Oh, without question there will be a sequel. Question is, how will they approach it?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rankles75 on Jun 19, 2015, 10:29:35 PM
Just got back from seeing it, and found it a lot of fun. Obviously, I wasn't expecting it to match the original (which was never going to be the case), but it was a definite improvement over 2 and 3 (imho). Was it cheesy in places? Undoubtedly, but I loved the callbacks to the original and the last half an hour was worth the ticket price by itself. Too many miserable gits around these days, if you ask me... :)

Also:

Spoiler
Glad to see the T-Rex back on top (albeit with some assistance) after the travesty of JP3. And I want a pet Raptor now... ;)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 19, 2015, 10:45:15 PM
Quote from: PRI. HUDSON on Jun 19, 2015, 09:31:27 PM
Oh, without question there will be a sequel. Question is, how will they approach it?

Trevorrow had a lengthy and candid interview on the Empire Podcast last Monday, it's fading into my memory but I think they touched on sequel possibilities there. Main thing I remember is that he envisaged it moving off the islands.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Plokoon111 on Jun 20, 2015, 01:17:05 AM
Spoiler
I think I want a pet baby long neck dino, or a baby triceratops, they were so damn cute and curious of the little kids.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Jun 20, 2015, 01:57:04 AM
Quote from: Plokoon111 on Jun 20, 2015, 01:17:05 AM
Spoiler
I think I want a pet baby long neck dino, or a baby triceratops, they were so damn cute and curious of the little kids.
[close]

Spoiler
I know right! If they were real it's too bad they grow very big very fast. Remember when D'onofrio speculated about multiple I-Rex's being smaller in and used combat environment? I think in the lab scene right before he gets eaten. Imagine if this kind of genetic manipulation was real... If they could just make miniature dinosaur pets, I'd totally have a T rex the size of a cat with blunt teeth and stuff like that. It'd probably cost more then a house lol.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 20, 2015, 08:24:03 AM
Or you could just go for a small relative, they weren't all gigantic.

Europasaurus was a Brachiosaurus-like animal that maxed at the size of a large horse, Turanoceratops was a 175-kilo Triceratops relative (and some more primitive ceratopsians were cat-size), Dilong was a tyrannosauroid the size of a dog, Saurornitholestes was a raptor the size of a large cat.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 20, 2015, 03:21:23 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MhrJRciqIsA
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 20, 2015, 04:29:15 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jun 20, 2015, 08:24:03 AM
Or you could just go for a small relative, they weren't all gigantic.

Europasaurus was a Brachiosaurus-like animal that maxed at the size of a large horse, Turanoceratops was a 175-kilo Triceratops relative (and some more primitive ceratopsians were cat-size), Dilong was a tyrannosauroid the size of a dog, Saurornitholestes was a raptor the size of a large cat.

"But consumers want them bigger, more teeth" :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: elemental-of-all on Jun 20, 2015, 05:35:01 PM
I seriously don't get the hate behind jp3.
It's better than the lost world in almost every way.
"Ughhh trex died"  ugh.... Yea? And it was awesome, take off your nostalgia glasses for a minute.

Of course it's not perfect, but it only gets bad rep becuase there has to be "the bad one" in any series of movies.

I can think of maybe 3 things even worth nitpicking on in jp3. Which I'd back up, the rest I'll defend to the death.
Also angry Joe is a shill. Sometimes he gets shit right, other times dead wrong.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Jun 20, 2015, 05:54:12 PM
I believe The Lost World surpasses JP3 in every way tbh.
JP3 was too short as well, felt rushed and had a cheesy story for a sequel and lame scenes ("ALAN!"). I dont hate it at all though, but its the least interesting of all the JP films. I never understood the TLW hate. I thought it was a great and believable sequel in the world of JP. Jp3 could have been better if it were longer, i really felt it missed something. Loved the effects and dinosaurs tho, and it was great to see Sam Neil and Laura Dern return, although I didnt like what they did with Ellie's character, JP1 showed a strong independend strongheaded woman, i wish we would have seen more of that effect rather then being a stay at home mom.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Jun 20, 2015, 05:56:11 PM
Quote from: elemental-of-all on Jun 20, 2015, 05:35:01 PM
I seriously don't get the hate behind jp3.
It's better than the lost world in almost every way.
"Ughhh trex died"  ugh.... Yea? And it was awesome, take off your nostalgia glasses for a minute.

Of course it's not perfect, but it only gets bad rep becuase there has to be "the bad one" in any series of movies.

I can think of maybe 3 things even worth nitpicking on in jp3. Which I'd back up, the rest I'll defend to the death.
Also angry Joe is a shill. Sometimes he gets shit right, other times dead wrong.

I know, right?  I can't believe that people are still pissed about the Spinosaurus beating the Rex in that movie, Spielberg supposedly put that scene of
Spoiler
the Rex smashing through the Spino skeleton
[close]
in Jurassic World just to appease butt-hurt fans.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Jun 20, 2015, 05:57:36 PM
Quote from: predxeno on Jun 20, 2015, 05:56:11 PM
Quote from: elemental-of-all on Jun 20, 2015, 05:35:01 PM
I seriously don't get the hate behind jp3.
It's better than the lost world in almost every way.
"Ughhh trex died"  ugh.... Yea? And it was awesome, take off your nostalgia glasses for a minute.

Of course it's not perfect, but it only gets bad rep becuase there has to be "the bad one" in any series of movies.

I can think of maybe 3 things even worth nitpicking on in jp3. Which I'd back up, the rest I'll defend to the death.
Also angry Joe is a shill. Sometimes he gets shit right, other times dead wrong.

I know, right?  I can't believe that people are still pissed about the Spinosaurus beating the Rex in that movie, Spielberg supposedly put that scene of
Spoiler
the Rex smashing through the Spino skeleton
[close]
in Jurassic World just to appease butt-hurt fans.

Thats not proven or stated by any official source anywhere rather then rumour though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Jun 20, 2015, 05:58:51 PM
Allegedly, Spielberg told fans he'd fix the issue in a panel he did way back when, at least that's what I heard. :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: elemental-of-all on Jun 20, 2015, 06:07:32 PM
People still use that dream sequence as an argument? ITS A DREAM! Who cares if it made no sense or was silly. It literally has no impact on anything. You should be  argueing that the raptor in the dream is a JP3 raptor and he shouldn't know what they look like. At least that's SOMETHING.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 20, 2015, 08:32:28 PM
No one cares about Jurassic Park 3.

The spinosaurus skeleton was placed there for one reason only; to get smashed to f**k by the T-Rex and it was totally awesome. The only way it would have been more awesome was to have the T-Rex pick it's teeth with one of the spines... of course those puny arms couldn't actually do it; but that's besides the point. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SuicideDoors on Jun 20, 2015, 08:38:20 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jun 20, 2015, 08:32:28 PM
No one cares about Jurassic Park 3.

The spinosaurus skeleton was placed there for one reason only; to get smashed to f**k by the T-Rex and it was totally awesome. The only way it would have been more awesome was to have the T-Rex pick it's teeth with one of the spines... of course those puny arms couldn't actually do it; but that's besides the point. :laugh:

Alright Alright Alright

The T-Rex is a cinema hero, JP3 was as heartbreaking as the last 20 minutes of JW was pure exhilarating
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Njm1983 on Jun 20, 2015, 10:22:24 PM
Just watched JW for the second time. Still really awesome. And the finale is great. I also noticed something...Are the gas jeeps in the film the same 2 that are used to bring the group from the helicopter pad to the visitor center in the first film?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 20, 2015, 11:00:17 PM
They're probably not the same prop, but in-universe, yes. I've read that the main jeep is the one Hammond and Gennaro ride on in Jurassic Park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Njm1983 on Jun 20, 2015, 11:21:29 PM
Yeah I meant in universe. I got home and was watching the first film noticed the numbers on the jeeps correspond with the 2 in jw.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: StrangeShape on Jun 21, 2015, 04:10:08 AM
My fiance loved it and said its one of the best, most fun movies shed ever seen. I myself arent really that crazy about it, I liked it, and its better than JP 3 for sure, but without the characters that I grew up with like Grant, ellie and malcolm, it doesnt feel like Jurassic sequel for me at all, rather an unrelated 2015 cool entertaining popcorn flick in 3d with dinos. I did love the ending when the T rex is released, such a cool treat for JP fans. And the shot where Claire is running with a flare in slow motion with T rex behind her is just wow
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 21, 2015, 07:43:42 AM
one thing for sure, as for the biggest blockbuster fails in the past years,  this one makes Prometheus indeed a 2011 Space Odyssey :D
i know even if its really a crap movie and i shouldnt bash a movie very frequently but damn, the amount of love it gets is too crazy now
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: noname on Jun 21, 2015, 12:39:53 PM
Just got back from the theater. I really loved the first 30 min of the movie. After that it was forgettable. Also I did not like the way the t-rex was designed. It seemed quite different from the previous movies.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on Jun 21, 2015, 01:24:09 PM
Going to see it next friday... can anyone spoil me if the Suchomimus or the Baryonyx make an appereance?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: elemental-of-all on Jun 21, 2015, 01:43:30 PM
Quote from: Tangakkai on Jun 21, 2015, 01:24:09 PM
Going to see it next friday... can anyone spoil me if the Suchomimus or the Baryonyx make an appereance?

No dice.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2015, 03:52:54 PM
I noticed a couple of continuity errors recently. When
Spoiler
Indominus attacks the Gyrosphere, the boys are facing into her mouth, yet when Zach releases their seatbelts, they fall down and in the following shot, their seats are facing away from Indominus.
[close]
Somehow it turned around without us noticing. The second error is after the big fight at the end. Rex plows through the Spinosaurus skeleton but when Blue runs off after it's over, if you look closely, you'll see it's standing again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Jun 21, 2015, 04:59:19 PM
^Hahaha, the T-Rex can't even kill a dead Spinosaurus. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 21, 2015, 06:43:33 PM
Spino, best troll ever :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2015, 06:48:43 PM
Quote from: elemental-of-all on Jun 20, 2015, 05:35:01 PM
I seriously don't get the hate behind jp3.
It's better than the lost world in almost every way.
"Ughhh trex died"  ugh.... Yea? And it was awesome, take off your nostalgia glasses for a minute.

Of course it's not perfect, but it only gets bad rep becuase there has to be "the bad one" in any series of movies.

I can think of maybe 3 things even worth nitpicking on in jp3. Which I'd back up, the rest I'll defend to the death.
Also angry Joe is a shill. Sometimes he gets shit right, other times dead wrong.

Because it's a poorly made film. It has horrible pacing, the writing is lousy, the directing is questionable, and overall, it's boring, something a Jurassic Park film shouldn't be.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Njm1983 on Jun 21, 2015, 06:52:15 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2015, 03:52:54 PM
I noticed a couple of continuity errors recently. When
Spoiler
Indominus attacks the Gyrosphere, the boys are facing into her mouth, yet when Zach releases their seatbelts, they fall down and in the following shot, their seats are facing away from Indominus.
[close]
Somehow it turned around without us noticing. The second error is after the big fight at the end. Rex plows through the Spinosaurus skeleton but when Blue runs off after it's over, if you look closely, you'll see it's standing again.

I just assumed the gyrosphere seats moved position from  taking damage.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 21, 2015, 07:10:50 PM
QuoteReal-Life 'Jurassic World' Dinos May Be 10 Years Off

http://news.discovery.com/animals/dinosaurs/real-life-jurassic-world-dinos-may-be-10-years-off-15061.htm (http://news.discovery.com/animals/dinosaurs/real-life-jurassic-world-dinos-may-be-10-years-off-15061.htm)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2015, 07:18:48 PM
Quote from: Njm1983 on Jun 21, 2015, 06:52:15 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2015, 03:52:54 PM
I noticed a couple of continuity errors recently. When
Spoiler
Indominus attacks the Gyrosphere, the boys are facing into her mouth, yet when Zach releases their seatbelts, they fall down and in the following shot, their seats are facing away from Indominus.
[close]
Somehow it turned around without us noticing. The second error is after the big fight at the end. Rex plows through the Spinosaurus skeleton but when Blue runs off after it's over, if you look closely, you'll see it's standing again.

I just assumed the gyrosphere seats moved position from  taking damage.

How would they have done a 180 degree turn?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 21, 2015, 08:09:32 PM
How Jurassic World's sound team created Indominus Rex's roar

https://vimeo.com/channels/staffpicks/130365792 (https://vimeo.com/channels/staffpicks/130365792)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Njm1983 on Jun 21, 2015, 08:31:00 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2015, 07:18:48 PM
Quote from: Njm1983 on Jun 21, 2015, 06:52:15 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2015, 03:52:54 PM
I noticed a couple of continuity errors recently. When
Spoiler
Indominus attacks the Gyrosphere, the boys are facing into her mouth, yet when Zach releases their seatbelts, they fall down and in the following shot, their seats are facing away from Indominus.
[close]
Somehow it turned around without us noticing. The second error is after the big fight at the end. Rex plows through the Spinosaurus skeleton but when Blue runs off after it's over, if you look closely, you'll see it's standing again.

I just assumed the gyrosphere seats moved position from  taking damage.

How would they have done a 180 degree turn?

Yeah I see your point.. only thing I could think of is that the weight of the kids somehow offsets the center of gravity for their seats. But then the moment they unbuckled the seats would move right into their downward path. It's clear that the seats stay in their inverted position in the movie... honestly it's not the end of the world. No different then the t Rex paddock drop off in the first film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 21, 2015, 08:53:40 PM
The cracked glass in the Indominus paddock is only there when Masrani asks about it; it is gone in all the other scenes in the paddock display room.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2015, 09:36:25 PM
Quote from: Njm1983 on Jun 21, 2015, 08:31:00 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2015, 07:18:48 PM
Quote from: Njm1983 on Jun 21, 2015, 06:52:15 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 21, 2015, 03:52:54 PM
I noticed a couple of continuity errors recently. When
Spoiler
Indominus attacks the Gyrosphere, the boys are facing into her mouth, yet when Zach releases their seatbelts, they fall down and in the following shot, their seats are facing away from Indominus.
[close]
Somehow it turned around without us noticing. The second error is after the big fight at the end. Rex plows through the Spinosaurus skeleton but when Blue runs off after it's over, if you look closely, you'll see it's standing again.

I just assumed the gyrosphere seats moved position from  taking damage.

How would they have done a 180 degree turn?

Yeah I see your point.. only thing I could think of is that the weight of the kids somehow offsets the center of gravity for their seats. But then the moment they unbuckled the seats would move right into their downward path. It's clear that the seats stay in their inverted position in the movie... honestly it's not the end of the world. No different then the t Rex paddock drop off in the first film.

It's not the end of the world for sure. But comparing to the Rex paddock scene is illogical as there is an explanation for that. (http://jplegacy.org/?ffjpking)

Quote from: Omegamorph on Jun 21, 2015, 08:53:40 PM
The cracked glass in the Indominus paddock is only there when Masrani asks about it; it is gone in all the other scenes in the paddock display room.

Good call. I hadn't noticed that one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Njm1983 on Jun 21, 2015, 10:27:51 PM
I didn't notice the glass either..


BTW the explanation they offer at jplegacy is pretty weak. Yeah its possible but unlikely. They forget the t Rex orientation when she eats the goat. The way she is presented she would have approached from the moat or at the very least been near the drop off on the inside. Feels very awkward to me. There's also the angle of Alan and lex swinging/climbing down which give us a good look in the direction of where the raised feeding /viewing area would have been. All you can see is foliage...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 21, 2015, 11:39:47 PM
I thought the boys just rolled off their seats to the ground.

As for the spino skeleton the front half doesn't fall down, so in that shot of Blue running down mainstreet maybe you can only see the front half.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Njm1983 on Jun 22, 2015, 12:19:21 AM
That part isn't the question. When the
Spoiler
I Rex smashes the gyrosphere down on them when they are on the ground, the seats are upside down
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2015, 08:33:30 AM
Quote from: Njm1983 on Jun 22, 2015, 12:19:21 AM
That part isn't the question. When the
Spoiler
I Rex smashes the gyrosphere down on them when they are on the ground, the seats are upside down
[close]

I see!

I'm on BBC Radio Norfolk today from 15:00pm (uk time) talking Masrani Global and Jurassic World for anyone who wishes to chime in.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/radionorfolk
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jun 22, 2015, 08:39:33 AM
I'll try and catch that. Congrats again!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2015, 08:41:16 AM
Cheers man ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 22, 2015, 11:56:32 AM
Is anyone here going to attend Jurassic Party on the 26th?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 22, 2015, 02:58:09 PM
What's that?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 22, 2015, 03:23:55 PM
Webcast with over 100 sfx artists that have worked on the JP films!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 22, 2015, 04:11:30 PM
Hm, I'd love to! Depends on the time though. Do you have more details? Google wasn't much help.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 22, 2015, 07:21:36 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 22, 2015, 04:11:30 PM
Hm, I'd love to! Depends on the time though. Do you have more details? Google wasn't much help.
Clickity (https://www.facebook.com/events/1001993743153645/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 22, 2015, 07:58:17 PM
Quote from: Omegamorph on Jun 22, 2015, 07:21:36 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 22, 2015, 04:11:30 PM
Hm, I'd love to! Depends on the time though. Do you have more details? Google wasn't much help.
Clickity (https://www.facebook.com/events/1001993743153645/)

Grazie!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Jun 22, 2015, 09:52:21 PM
Lol! Racist controversy hits Jurassic World (along with the sexist controversy). Nothing is safe from the PC brigade these days.

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/jurassic-worlds-unintentionally-very-racist-line-is-stunning-audiences-10328121.html
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 22, 2015, 10:15:19 PM
http://comicbook.com/2015/06/22/jurassic-world-becomes-fastest-film-to-reach-1-billion-at-worldw/

QuoteJurassic World just became the fastest movie ever to cross the $1 billion global box offie threshold. The Colin Trevorrow-directed Jurassic Park sequel achieved the feat in less than two weeks, gobbling box office records previously held by Marvel's The Avengers along the way. It took The Avengers 14 days to hit $1 billion, while Jurassic World reached it in just 10.

Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 22, 2015, 09:52:21 PM
Lol! Racist controversy hits Jurassic World (along with the sexist controversy). Nothing is safe from the PC brigade these days.

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/jurassic-worlds-unintentionally-very-racist-line-is-stunning-audiences-10328121.html

I KNEW IT!!! I KNEW SOME DAY SOMEONE WAS GOING TO COMPLAIN ABOUT RACISM IN THAT REGARD. Holy shit, I'm not even kidding. Every time I go to the Royal Ontario Museum here in Toronto and show my friends the Pachycephalosaurus skeleton, I always ask, "How long do you think it'll be before someone labels that dinosaur as having a racist name?"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Keg on Jun 22, 2015, 10:39:53 PM
Still irritates me how here in Britain a shortened way of saying a persons nationality has managed to become quite a strong racial slur. Paki is just a shorter way of saying Pakistani but over the years its become hugely derogatory to say that. Why? It's the same as removing the "tish" and calling somebody a Scot. Its ridiculous. And even more infuriating that the media would even pick up on this in the film.

PC brigade always banging on about offending people yet nobody was offended in the first place until it was brought to peoples attention by the very people who are trying not to offend. My head hurts.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jun 22, 2015, 10:42:03 PM
I guess JP5 will be out by 2018 since they can use the next three years to plan out story ideas and give the cast some room to do other ideas. July 2018 is open at the moment and it will be out a month later after Godzilla 2.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2015, 11:12:10 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Jun 22, 2015, 10:42:03 PM
July 2018 is open at the moment and it will be out a month after Godzilla 2.

I will die from sheer happiness if that happens.

Here's my radio interview from earlier today if anyone missed it...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCN6wSLz_lI
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scm on Jun 22, 2015, 11:57:05 PM
Quote from: elemental-of-all on Jun 20, 2015, 05:35:01 PM
I seriously don't get the hate behind jp3.
It's better than the lost world in almost every way.
"Ughhh trex died"  ugh.... Yea? And it was awesome, take off your nostalgia glasses for a minute.

Of course it's not perfect, but it only gets bad rep becuase there has to be "the bad one" in any series of movies.

I can think of maybe 3 things even worth nitpicking on in jp3. Which I'd back up, the rest I'll defend to the death.
Also angry Joe is a shill. Sometimes he gets shit right, other times dead wrong.

The darker tone of lost world and the soundtrack are what put it miles ahead of jp3 for me. Which made me very happy to hear a few musical cues from lost world in JW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Jun 23, 2015, 12:45:57 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 22, 2015, 10:15:19 PM
http://comicbook.com/2015/06/22/jurassic-world-becomes-fastest-film-to-reach-1-billion-at-worldw/

QuoteJurassic World just became the fastest movie ever to cross the $1 billion global box offie threshold. The Colin Trevorrow-directed Jurassic Park sequel achieved the feat in less than two weeks, gobbling box office records previously held by Marvel's The Avengers along the way. It took The Avengers 14 days to hit $1 billion, while Jurassic World reached it in just 10.

Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 22, 2015, 09:52:21 PM
Lol! Racist controversy hits Jurassic World (along with the sexist controversy). Nothing is safe from the PC brigade these days.

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/jurassic-worlds-unintentionally-very-racist-line-is-stunning-audiences-10328121.html

I KNEW IT!!! I KNEW SOME DAY SOMEONE WAS GOING TO COMPLAIN ABOUT RACISM IN THAT REGARD. Holy shit, I'm not even kidding. Every time I go to the Royal Ontario Museum here in Toronto and show my friends the Pachycephalosaurus skeleton, I always ask, "How long do you think it'll be before someone labels that dinosaur as having a racist name?"

The first generally regarded average movie to somehow reach 1 billion the quickest.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: scm on Jun 23, 2015, 12:53:26 AM
Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 23, 2015, 12:45:57 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 22, 2015, 10:15:19 PM
http://comicbook.com/2015/06/22/jurassic-world-becomes-fastest-film-to-reach-1-billion-at-worldw/

QuoteJurassic World just became the fastest movie ever to cross the $1 billion global box offie threshold. The Colin Trevorrow-directed Jurassic Park sequel achieved the feat in less than two weeks, gobbling box office records previously held by Marvel's The Avengers along the way. It took The Avengers 14 days to hit $1 billion, while Jurassic World reached it in just 10.

Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 22, 2015, 09:52:21 PM
Lol! Racist controversy hits Jurassic World (along with the sexist controversy). Nothing is safe from the PC brigade these days.

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/jurassic-worlds-unintentionally-very-racist-line-is-stunning-audiences-10328121.html

I KNEW IT!!! I KNEW SOME DAY SOMEONE WAS GOING TO COMPLAIN ABOUT RACISM IN THAT REGARD. Holy shit, I'm not even kidding. Every time I go to the Royal Ontario Museum here in Toronto and show my friends the Pachycephalosaurus skeleton, I always ask, "How long do you think it'll be before someone labels that dinosaur as having a racist name?"

The first generally regarded average movie to somehow reach 1 billion the quickest.
Cry more?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 23, 2015, 01:51:30 AM
Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 23, 2015, 12:45:57 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 22, 2015, 10:15:19 PM
http://comicbook.com/2015/06/22/jurassic-world-becomes-fastest-film-to-reach-1-billion-at-worldw/

QuoteJurassic World just became the fastest movie ever to cross the $1 billion global box offie threshold. The Colin Trevorrow-directed Jurassic Park sequel achieved the feat in less than two weeks, gobbling box office records previously held by Marvel's The Avengers along the way. It took The Avengers 14 days to hit $1 billion, while Jurassic World reached it in just 10.

Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 22, 2015, 09:52:21 PM
Lol! Racist controversy hits Jurassic World (along with the sexist controversy). Nothing is safe from the PC brigade these days.

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/jurassic-worlds-unintentionally-very-racist-line-is-stunning-audiences-10328121.html

I KNEW IT!!! I KNEW SOME DAY SOMEONE WAS GOING TO COMPLAIN ABOUT RACISM IN THAT REGARD. Holy shit, I'm not even kidding. Every time I go to the Royal Ontario Museum here in Toronto and show my friends the Pachycephalosaurus skeleton, I always ask, "How long do you think it'll be before someone labels that dinosaur as having a racist name?"

The first generally regarded average movie to somehow reach 1 billion the quickest.

You absolutely will not see this movie just out spite, won't you?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Jun 23, 2015, 02:59:18 AM
Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 22, 2015, 09:52:21 PM
Lol! Racist controversy hits Jurassic World (along with the sexist controversy). Nothing is safe from the PC brigade these days.

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/jurassic-worlds-unintentionally-very-racist-line-is-stunning-audiences-10328121.html

lmfao!!! That is one of the funniest articles I've ever read! People are actually offended by that? LOL
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 23, 2015, 04:12:31 AM
Pachycephalosaurus was named before Pakistan even existed, what the f**k.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jun 23, 2015, 07:48:50 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 23, 2015, 01:51:30 AM
Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 23, 2015, 12:45:57 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 22, 2015, 10:15:19 PM
http://comicbook.com/2015/06/22/jurassic-world-becomes-fastest-film-to-reach-1-billion-at-worldw/

QuoteJurassic World just became the fastest movie ever to cross the $1 billion global box offie threshold. The Colin Trevorrow-directed Jurassic Park sequel achieved the feat in less than two weeks, gobbling box office records previously held by Marvel's The Avengers along the way. It took The Avengers 14 days to hit $1 billion, while Jurassic World reached it in just 10.

Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 22, 2015, 09:52:21 PM
Lol! Racist controversy hits Jurassic World (along with the sexist controversy). Nothing is safe from the PC brigade these days.

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/jurassic-worlds-unintentionally-very-racist-line-is-stunning-audiences-10328121.html

I KNEW IT!!! I KNEW SOME DAY SOMEONE WAS GOING TO COMPLAIN ABOUT RACISM IN THAT REGARD. Holy shit, I'm not even kidding. Every time I go to the Royal Ontario Museum here in Toronto and show my friends the Pachycephalosaurus skeleton, I always ask, "How long do you think it'll be before someone labels that dinosaur as having a racist name?"

The first generally regarded average movie to somehow reach 1 billion the quickest.

You absolutely will not see this movie just out spite, won't you?

Hubbs - If you can't contribute anything to the thread then don't bother coming in.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 23, 2015, 08:13:26 AM
Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 23, 2015, 12:45:57 AM
The first widely regarded awesome summer movie to reach 1 billion the quickest.

Fixed. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 23, 2015, 11:15:39 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTChJruqJTc
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 23, 2015, 11:46:23 AM
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Jun 23, 2015, 07:48:50 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 23, 2015, 01:51:30 AM
Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 23, 2015, 12:45:57 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 22, 2015, 10:15:19 PM
http://comicbook.com/2015/06/22/jurassic-world-becomes-fastest-film-to-reach-1-billion-at-worldw/

QuoteJurassic World just became the fastest movie ever to cross the $1 billion global box offie threshold. The Colin Trevorrow-directed Jurassic Park sequel achieved the feat in less than two weeks, gobbling box office records previously held by Marvel's The Avengers along the way. It took The Avengers 14 days to hit $1 billion, while Jurassic World reached it in just 10.

Quote from: Hubbs on Jun 22, 2015, 09:52:21 PM
Lol! Racist controversy hits Jurassic World (along with the sexist controversy). Nothing is safe from the PC brigade these days.

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/jurassic-worlds-unintentionally-very-racist-line-is-stunning-audiences-10328121.html

I KNEW IT!!! I KNEW SOME DAY SOMEONE WAS GOING TO COMPLAIN ABOUT RACISM IN THAT REGARD. Holy shit, I'm not even kidding. Every time I go to the Royal Ontario Museum here in Toronto and show my friends the Pachycephalosaurus skeleton, I always ask, "How long do you think it'll be before someone labels that dinosaur as having a racist name?"

The first generally regarded average movie to somehow reach 1 billion the quickest.

You absolutely will not see this movie just out spite, won't you?

If you can't contribute anything to the thread then don't bother coming in.

Just so we're clear, you're speaking to Hubbs...right?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jun 23, 2015, 11:51:52 AM
I am, sorry. I'll make that clearer.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 23, 2015, 12:11:41 PM
Now that we know how the sequel has been set up, any ideas on how it will pan out?
Spoiler
I have a feeling BioSys will make a return.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jun 23, 2015, 12:17:05 PM
Spoiler
Wu getting away with embryos wasn't just put in there for the lulz. Neither was his becoming a darker character. Perhaps someone less savoury will be hiring him in the future...
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 23, 2015, 12:21:17 PM
Quote from: szkoki on Jun 23, 2015, 11:15:39 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTChJruqJTc

He talks about CGI like its push a button and up pops a tree, dinosaur or whatever. No one appreciates the amazing artistry behind the art form. JW was an incredible feat of CGI and practical.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 23, 2015, 12:44:38 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Jun 23, 2015, 12:17:05 PM
Spoiler
Wu getting away with embryos wasn't just put in there for the lulz. Neither was his becoming a darker character. Perhaps someone less savoury will be hiring him in the future...
[close]

Spoiler
You think it'll be the military?
[close]

Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 23, 2015, 12:21:17 PM
Quote from: szkoki on Jun 23, 2015, 11:15:39 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTChJruqJTc

He talks about CGI like its push a button and up pops a tree, dinosaur or whatever. No one appreciates the amazing artistry behind the art form. JW was an incredible feat of CGI and practical.

The CG is very noticeable in JW though. It definitely doesn't look as good as it did in JP.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 23, 2015, 01:16:41 PM
JP was printed on film, JW was filmed on digital. Of course there is going to be more scrutiny in JW.

I still do think that people saying JW's CGI looks off should go to the nearest oculist or something. There are some dodgy shots but it's all around solid work.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 23, 2015, 01:29:31 PM
Whatever the reason, it took a lot of people out of the movie. I feel like there was only one animatronic shot in the entirety of JW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Deathbearer on Jun 23, 2015, 01:31:32 PM
I saw it this weekend and I have to say it was the best movie I've seen all summer. I did not expect it to be as great as it was..just..holy shit it was good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jun 23, 2015, 01:33:19 PM
While I'm certainly not a hater, I still don't quite get why people are going so mental over this film. There really was very little in it I hadn't seen done better before elsewhere. It was OK, but nothing particularly special.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 23, 2015, 02:24:59 PM
For JP fans, it's primarily because it washed out the bad taste of the two previous sequels and this one picks up in a very logical place. It's also a kind of reflection on modern society and in particular, movie goers. When Claire says, "Consumers want them bigger. More teeth", that's kind of a jab at most people today who don't have enough patience to appreciate what they're given. They always want the next big thing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jun 23, 2015, 02:27:04 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 23, 2015, 02:24:59 PMFor JP fans, it's primarily because it washed out the bad taste of the two previous sequels and this one picks up in a very logical place.

I'm a JP fan. The first two movies were far superior.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 23, 2015, 02:24:59 PMIt's also a kind of reflection on modern society and in particular, movie goers. When Claire says, "Consumers want them bigger. More teeth", that's kind of a jab at most people today who don't have enough patience to appreciate what they're given. They always want the next big thing.

That's all very true, but some societal critique doesn't automatically make it a masterpiece. I'm not criticising people for liking it, I just don't get the fuss.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 23, 2015, 03:44:54 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Jun 23, 2015, 02:27:04 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 23, 2015, 02:24:59 PMFor JP fans, it's primarily because it washed out the bad taste of the two previous sequels and this one picks up in a very logical place.

I'm a JP fan. The first two movies were far superior.

The majority of fans would disagree with you, hence the fuss. Nothing will be as good as the first film, but JW is miles ahead of TLW or JP 3.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Jun 23, 2015, 06:00:34 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 23, 2015, 03:44:54 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Jun 23, 2015, 02:27:04 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 23, 2015, 02:24:59 PMFor JP fans, it's primarily because it washed out the bad taste of the two previous sequels and this one picks up in a very logical place.

I'm a JP fan. The first two movies were far superior.

The majority of fans would disagree with you, hence the fuss. Nothing will be as good as the first film, but JW is miles ahead of TLW or JP 3.

Taste in movies is subjective. Whilst the older films have flaws, I dare not even begin to count those of JW. But trust me when I say that I really, really wish I could have enjoyed it as much as you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 23, 2015, 06:08:37 PM
Fair enough. Don't forget though, that there are still objective ways of looking at a movie and on those grounds, I will maintain JW is better than either of them.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Johnny Handsome on Jun 23, 2015, 06:20:51 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 23, 2015, 12:21:17 PM
Quote from: szkoki on Jun 23, 2015, 11:15:39 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTChJruqJTc

He talks about CGI like its push a button and up pops a tree, dinosaur or whatever. No one appreciates the amazing artistry behind the art form. JW was an incredible feat of CGI and practical.
That's because these people don't actually do visual effects or know how it all works. I always read by people on forums they go the CG route because its "fast and cheap"... i smile and continue to the next post. It's incredibly difficult and in no way a lower task than building an animatronic creature.

Loved JW by the way, every second of it.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 23, 2015, 06:39:58 PM
Johnny Handsome! You're back from the dead!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 23, 2015, 07:03:59 PM
If you rewatch the original film you can laugh at the feet placement of all the CG dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Keg on Jun 23, 2015, 08:17:33 PM
People who say the CGI is worse than the original must have bad cataracts. I rewatched them all recently and yes considering JP was one of the first films to extensively use CGI it still holds up very well. But certain shots like the brachiosaurus look dated now. The initial T Rex attack in the rain still looks absolutely fantastic 22 years later.

Don't care if its CG or practical as long as it looks good and I thought JW looked fantastic. There was nothing in it that made me grimace and think "really that shit looks unfinished". Remember the terrible stampede scene in King Kong? That kind of thing never happened once while watching any JP film. Strange that one in King Kong, everything else was great apart from that one scene. The compositing of the actors was hilariously bad.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 23, 2015, 08:24:49 PM
The CG in Jurassic World is really top-notch. It's no longer ground breaking at is was back in Jurassic Park's time but it shows just how much refinement has gone into computer technology over the past 22 years. Both movies T-Rex have so much life in them be it practical or cgi.

However I don't think the mo-capture was the best choice. Humans are not reptiles unless the plan was to make the dinosaurs more human.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Jun 23, 2015, 08:39:17 PM
Some of the I-rex CGI I thought was very good.  Other things that impressed me CGI-wise included the Apatosaurus body.  I would have thought it was real, except the behind the scenes video for the Apatosaurus puppet implies the head and neck is all that is "real."

Overall, however, I didn't think the CGI was spectacular.  Sometimes, it seemed completely unnecessary!  There is no way any of the raptor in the cage head stuff was practical like the behind the scenes photos.  Texture looked too different, and if anything, it was augmented practical stuff (though I'd personally bet on it being all CGI)  I'm just disappointed with the blatant lack of practical work. 

Spoiler
The only animatronic stuff seems to be the dead Apatosaurus head, the tip of the Pteranodon's beak when it falls in front of Zach and Gray, and the Dimorphodon attacking Pratt.  I especially missed any practical T-Rex head shots that seemed so scarily real in the first two films.
[close]

So I watched Jurassic World yesterday.

The Lost World was my childhood film, and I love the Jurassic Park films.  Hardcore love.  That being said, I wasn't disappointed with Jurassic World.  I don't think it beats the first two (they had such great atmosphere, which I don't find in Jurassic World, not even
Spoiler
with the ruins of the first park scene
[close]
), yet, it was fun and entertaining.  I liked Pratt, though most of the characters seemed a bit thin.  The dinosaur action was okay - and I did enjoy the last big dinosaur sequence a lot.  For better or for worse (I think a lot of my current opinion has to do with my current mentality, and perhaps a few weeks ago I would've been disappointed) I got exactly what I expected from the trailers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Jun 23, 2015, 08:42:41 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jun 23, 2015, 08:24:49 PMHowever I don't think the mo-capture was the best choice. Humans are not reptiles unless the plan was to make the dinosaurs more human.

Spoiler
Yeah I definitely got that feeling. It's moved beyond 'clever girl' and now it's the Indominus controlling raptors and stuff like that. I'm surprised the rex and raptor didn't high-five after the big fight at the end. It was a tad cutesy.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: jacc.90 on Jun 23, 2015, 10:35:14 PM
Me:

JP: 8'5

TLW: 6'5

JP3: 5

JW: 6
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 24, 2015, 12:25:27 AM
Quote from: Gilfryd on Jun 23, 2015, 08:42:41 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jun 23, 2015, 08:24:49 PMHowever I don't think the mo-capture was the best choice. Humans are not reptiles unless the plan was to make the dinosaurs more human.

Spoiler
Yeah I definitely got that feeling. It's moved beyond 'clever girl' and now it's the Indominus controlling raptors and stuff like that. I'm surprised the rex and raptor didn't high-five after the big fight at the end. It was a tad cutesy.
[close]

Spoiler
The entire iRex being able to talk Raptor just because it has Raptor DNA actually irritates me, just a little. :P However the facial expression of many of the dinosaurs in JW, especially the mosasaur and T-rex were amazing. The cg mattes were perfect. However the one downside I thought was that it gave them a bit to much sad puppy eyes than terrible lizard eyes.

Which may have been the plan, to make dinosaurs less monstrous and replace it with a true monster, be it made man, the iRex.
[close]

I rewatched the last three movies over the past week and JP3 was bad. :P TLW was fine though, they really should remove that one gymnastic scene and if possible, Vince Vaughn. I just hate that character.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 24, 2015, 12:53:09 AM
The problem with
Spoiler
Indominus communicating with the raptors
[close]
was that
Spoiler
Indominus was raised in isolation. How could she have vocal skills if she's had no one to talk to?
[close]
It's like in Star Trek IV, with the alien probe looking for the whales. You'll recall Spock said "We could replicate the noise, but not the language. We'd be responding in gibberish."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 24, 2015, 12:57:58 AM
No arguments here; that was a massive oversight.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on Jun 24, 2015, 01:04:07 AM
Quote from: Johnny Handsome on Jun 23, 2015, 06:20:51 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 23, 2015, 12:21:17 PM
He talks about CGI like its push a button and up pops a tree, dinosaur or whatever. No one appreciates the amazing artistry behind the art form. JW was an incredible feat of CGI and practical.
That's because these people don't actually do visual effects or know how it all works. I always read by people on forums they go the CG route because its "fast and cheap"... i smile and continue to the next post. It's incredibly difficult and in no way a lower task than building an animatronic creature.
He never says they go to CGI because it's fast and cheap, or that it's click-of-a-button stuff. The closest he gets is saying it's faster than it was, so more of a viable option than it used to be, which is entirely true.

Much of everything else he says is right on the money about modern use of CGI in general. Instead of using CGI as a tool, most modern filmmakers use it as their entire toolkit. It's the prosthetics, the animatronics, the men in suits, AND the friggin' DP in many cases all rolled into one. There are a handful of directors on big budget productions who still opt for as many practical elements as possible - Nolan, for example - before resorting to CGI for stuff that needs CGI.

The CG in Jurassic Park isn't better than Jurassic World, but the overall effects work is more convincing as a whole. The fact there's very little of it doesn't hurt, either -- a lesson no big budget blockbuster will ever, ever remember.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: StrangeShape on Jun 24, 2015, 02:06:40 AM
Not only that, but the CG in JP is shot very well, with dark lighting, rain, often interlaced with real life animatronic, or is, as you said, very brief. For me T2 and JP are two movies which still have the best or, most convincing CGI
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Jun 24, 2015, 02:33:26 AM
Love the CGI usage in The Lost World: Jurassic Park.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: noname on Jun 24, 2015, 06:30:46 AM
Cg in JW is fine, it's just that they seem to be stylizing the contrast and color and making it look too sharp. If they brought the natural light and color it may have looked more realistic. Also for some reason the dinosaurs in JW looked more cartoony than the first and second movie. (yeah, I know that the brachiosaurus from the first movie was cartoony but the rest were quite amazing)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 24, 2015, 12:35:56 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?t=692&v=EBo1XxieDcw

Q&A with Jack Horner and Frank Marshall with Kathleen Kennedy
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Njm1983 on Jun 25, 2015, 04:27:23 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 24, 2015, 12:53:09 AM
The problem with
Spoiler
Indominus communicating with the raptors
[close]
was that
Spoiler
Indominus was raised in isolation. How could she have vocal skills if she's had no one to talk to?
[close]
It's like in Star Trek IV, with the alien probe looking for the whales. You'll recall Spock said "We could replicate the noise, but not the language. We'd be responding in gibberish."

You have a real point there.
Spoiler
I kinda felt like Owen being with the soldiers was more the reason why they turned rather than the I Rex chatting them up. Which would explain why blue and the squad changed loyalty back to Owen when he disarmed himself just before the finale
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jun 25, 2015, 07:32:39 AM
Quote from: Njm1983 on Jun 25, 2015, 04:27:23 AMYou have a real point there.
Spoiler
I kinda felt like Owen being with the soldiers was more the reason why they turned rather than the I Rex chatting them up. Which would explain why blue and the squad changed loyalty back to Owen when he disarmed himself just before the finale
[close]

But how would a raptor know what a gun is? No one's been shooting at them before.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Jun 25, 2015, 08:03:22 AM
Quote from: Njm1983 on Jun 21, 2015, 10:27:51 PM
I didn't notice the glass either..


BTW the explanation they offer at jplegacy is pretty weak. Yeah its possible but unlikely. They forget the t Rex orientation when she eats the goat. The way she is presented she would have approached from the moat or at the very least been near the drop off on the inside. Feels very awkward to me. There's also the angle of Alan and lex swinging/climbing down which give us a good look in the direction of where the raised feeding /viewing area would have been. All you can see is foliage...

There's also the problem that when the vehicle is dropped off the side it lands in the tree with the roof facing the wall barely 3 metres away, but in the next scene when Grant is approaching the tree with the vehicle in it there is plenty of open area in front of it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 25, 2015, 12:04:34 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Jun 25, 2015, 07:32:39 AM
Quote from: Njm1983 on Jun 25, 2015, 04:27:23 AMYou have a real point there.
Spoiler
I kinda felt like Owen being with the soldiers was more the reason why they turned rather than the I Rex chatting them up. Which would explain why blue and the squad changed loyalty back to Owen when he disarmed himself just before the finale
[close]

But how would a raptor know what a gun is? No one's been shooting at them before.

Pretty sure they got shot at during those scenes, even if we didn't exactly see it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jun 25, 2015, 12:06:34 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jun 25, 2015, 12:04:34 PMPretty sure they got shot at during those scenes, even if we didn't exactly see it.

The soldiers didn't start shooting until after the raptors turned.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 25, 2015, 02:07:07 PM
Quote from: Njm1983 on Jun 25, 2015, 04:27:23 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 24, 2015, 12:53:09 AM
The problem with
Spoiler
Indominus communicating with the raptors
[close]
was that
Spoiler
Indominus was raised in isolation. How could she have vocal skills if she's had no one to talk to?
[close]
It's like in Star Trek IV, with the alien probe looking for the whales. You'll recall Spock said "We could replicate the noise, but not the language. We'd be responding in gibberish."

You have a real point there.
Spoiler
I kinda felt like Owen being with the soldiers was more the reason why they turned rather than the I Rex chatting them up. Which would explain why blue and the squad changed loyalty back to Owen when he disarmed himself just before the finale
[close]

That would imply the raptors have the ability to reason. Do we want to give them that much credit for their intelligence?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master Chief on Jun 25, 2015, 02:58:06 PM
They can definitely think and understand. What's the reason you don't think they can?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 25, 2015, 04:05:53 PM
Most animals can't, by default. But then again, this is a movie, so...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Twin Drive Sigma Aquarion on Jun 25, 2015, 05:03:27 PM
Welp, it is official

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs11.postimg.org%2Fhiovbvuv7%2F1billion.png&hash=422d229d4407a1bca958198eb9ebe921b813dfab)

Start taking bets on Jurassic Park 5.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 25, 2015, 05:33:43 PM
As if a 511 million weekend opener wasn't already a a guarantee.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 25, 2015, 05:53:22 PM
I doubt the sequel will make as much. Part of the reason this movie has made as much as it did was because there was sooooooooooo much hype leading up to it. 14 years of anticipation helps.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 25, 2015, 06:46:35 PM
Star Wars is going to blow this the f**k out of the sky.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 25, 2015, 07:26:49 PM
Star Wars is going to blow everything the f**k out of the sky.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rankles75 on Jun 25, 2015, 07:49:19 PM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 25, 2015, 06:46:35 PM
Star Wars is going to blow this the f**k out of the sky.

Undoubtedly. Hopefully this time, it will deserve to...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 25, 2015, 07:49:49 PM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 25, 2015, 06:46:35 PM
Star Wars is going to blow this the f**k out of the sky.
Yeah and?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 25, 2015, 07:55:21 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Jun 25, 2015, 12:06:34 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jun 25, 2015, 12:04:34 PMPretty sure they got shot at during those scenes, even if we didn't exactly see it.

The soldiers didn't start shooting until after the raptors turned.

I know.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 25, 2015, 07:58:40 PM
If history is any indicator, Force Awakens will rake in more in total, but not break the opening weekend record.
Phantom Menace didn't come close to Lost World's opening, which can't be put down to reviews or word of mouth that early in the run, but is more likely attributable to the nuances of a summer vs winter launch.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 25, 2015, 08:16:55 PM
A bit off-topic, but I wonder if Avatar can be dethroned some day
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 25, 2015, 08:26:05 PM
Quote from: Crazy Shrimp on Jun 25, 2015, 08:16:55 PM
A bit off-topic, but I wonder if Avatar can be dethroned some day

I hope so. Space Pocahontas is a little too overrated.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 25, 2015, 08:57:11 PM
I left a Dairy Queen about 20 mins with free JW promo materials! It's amazing what you can get if you just ask nicely 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 25, 2015, 09:54:02 PM
Quote from: Crazy Shrimp on Jun 25, 2015, 08:16:55 PM
A bit off-topic, but I wonder if Avatar can be dethroned some day

I don't think it'll happen for a long time. That film was a perfect storm of Cameron's auteur-driven mass appeal, never-before-seen spectacle and brand new cinema technology, and leapfrogged every other box office take by a VAST margin.

I'm not sure we're in a cinematic landscape where such combinations are currently possible - I think Avatar's only going to get unseated when sheer ticket price inflation catches up with it. Don't hold your breath, no-one else has even caught up with Titanic yet after 17.5 years.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 25, 2015, 10:06:07 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jun 25, 2015, 08:26:05 PM
Quote from: Crazy Shrimp on Jun 25, 2015, 08:16:55 PM
A bit off-topic, but I wonder if Avatar can be dethroned some day

I hope so. Space Pocahontas is a little too overrated.

This! someone should kick that blue ass :laugh:

Quote from: Vertigo on Jun 25, 2015, 09:54:02 PM
Quote from: Crazy Shrimp on Jun 25, 2015, 08:16:55 PM
A bit off-topic, but I wonder if Avatar can be dethroned some day

I don't think it'll happen for a long time. That film was a perfect storm of Cameron's auteur-driven mass appeal, never-before-seen spectacle and brand new cinema technology, and leapfrogged every other box office take by a VAST margin.

I'm not sure we're in a cinematic landscape where such combinations are currently possible - I think Avatar's only going to get unseated when sheer ticket price inflation catches up with it. Don't hold your breath, no-one else has even caught up with Titanic yet after 17.5 years.

Yeah, perhaps a new revolution in special effects and cinematography will be required.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 25, 2015, 10:18:05 PM
In hindsight, I feel kind of sorry for Indominus. Poor thing was a genetic freak, a Frankenstein Monster's...and ended up being the one who ultimately suffered because of human arrogance. What do you guys think?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 25, 2015, 11:12:35 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 25, 2015, 10:18:05 PM
In hindsight, I feel kind of sorry for Indominus. Poor thing was a genetic freak, a Frankenstein Monster's...and ended up being the one who ultimately suffered because of human arrogance. What do you guys think?
Well it didn't look like it -wasn't- having a great time eating everybody. It immediately ate the first thing it saw. Unlike Frankenstein's monster or king kong; I don't think they gave it a heart. A pure killing machine is what it was. It took what man gave it and ran. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Jun 25, 2015, 11:34:37 PM
Pure killing machine eating everything that moves until Raptors. Sorry, can't help myself. I feel very bitter about this film. Wanted to want to see it twice but honestly couldn't waste my time on it I don't think I'll like it anymore. Might rewatch the first again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jun 26, 2015, 12:30:21 AM
Almost purchased the I-Rex deluxe toy the other day bc it looked complete badass. Only 8 more days until I finally get to witness Jurassic World...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 26, 2015, 01:55:43 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jun 25, 2015, 11:12:35 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 25, 2015, 10:18:05 PM
In hindsight, I feel kind of sorry for Indominus. Poor thing was a genetic freak, a Frankenstein Monster's...and ended up being the one who ultimately suffered because of human arrogance. What do you guys think?
Well it didn't look like it -wasn't- having a great time eating everybody. It immediately ate the first thing it saw. Unlike Frankenstein's monster or king kong; I don't think they gave it a heart. A pure killing machine is what it was. It took what man gave it and ran. :)

But then can we hold it responsible for its actions? If it's only behaving as it was created, then I would argue we can't.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PRI. HUDSON on Jun 26, 2015, 02:35:54 AM
Quote from: Taxemic on Jun 25, 2015, 11:34:37 PM
Pure killing machine eating everything that moves until Raptors. Sorry, can't help myself. I feel very bitter about this film. Wanted to want to see it twice but honestly couldn't waste my time on it I don't think I'll like it anymore. Might rewatch the first again.

The raptors still got killed by it, so I fail to see your point.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 26, 2015, 05:14:34 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 26, 2015, 01:55:43 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jun 25, 2015, 11:12:35 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 25, 2015, 10:18:05 PM
In hindsight, I feel kind of sorry for Indominus. Poor thing was a genetic freak, a Frankenstein Monster's...and ended up being the one who ultimately suffered because of human arrogance. What do you guys think?
Well it didn't look like it -wasn't- having a great time eating everybody. It immediately ate the first thing it saw. Unlike Frankenstein's monster or king kong; I don't think they gave it a heart. A pure killing machine is what it was. It took what man gave it and ran. :)

But then can we hold it responsible for its actions? If it's only behaving as it was created, then I would argue we can't.
I don't think so. Hell it is a weapon made by man; so any deaths are on it's creators shoulders. That would be like blaming the alien for wanting to reproduce using the Nostromos crew.

Though it is both sentient and sapient so it is possible it feels fear... but the dinosaur itself wasn't explored enough in the movie. All we really got to see was the weapon aspect of the beast. Actually we don't even know if it is dead, we didn't see it die on screen. Hard to feel sorry for it considering how perfect a dinosaur it is.

Maybe not dinosaur but mutant creation aka monster. It's a predators dream.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Jun 26, 2015, 07:21:37 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 25, 2015, 06:46:35 PM
Star Wars is going to blow this the f**k out of the sky.

Well im a big fan of both movie series, so personally I dont mind which one is on top considering sales but I believe the problem with Star Wars might be that it's not really for everyone whereas Jurassic Park/World has a wider apeal to people in general I think.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 26, 2015, 10:53:15 AM
Palaeontologist Mark Witton doodling about the fine art of Velociraptor taming:

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CIVeLBuWIAASDYw.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 26, 2015, 12:12:01 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDjEvsx4h6I
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Jun 26, 2015, 12:13:19 PM
(https://m2.behance.net/rendition/pm/27392729/max_1200/86b2f4da7a7ab372ef13872934d3e6cf.jpg)

This poster is pretty awesome
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 26, 2015, 12:40:48 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jun 26, 2015, 05:14:34 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 26, 2015, 01:55:43 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jun 25, 2015, 11:12:35 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 25, 2015, 10:18:05 PM
In hindsight, I feel kind of sorry for Indominus. Poor thing was a genetic freak, a Frankenstein Monster's...and ended up being the one who ultimately suffered because of human arrogance. What do you guys think?
Well it didn't look like it -wasn't- having a great time eating everybody. It immediately ate the first thing it saw. Unlike Frankenstein's monster or king kong; I don't think they gave it a heart. A pure killing machine is what it was. It took what man gave it and ran. :)

But then can we hold it responsible for its actions? If it's only behaving as it was created, then I would argue we can't.
I don't think so. Hell it is a weapon made by man; so any deaths are on it's creators shoulders. That would be like blaming the alien for wanting to reproduce using the Nostromos crew.

Though it is both sentient and sapient so it is possible it feels fear... but the dinosaur itself wasn't explored enough in the movie. All we really got to see was the weapon aspect of the beast. Actually we don't even know if it is dead, we didn't see it die on screen. Hard to feel sorry for it considering how perfect a dinosaur it is.

Maybe not dinosaur but mutant creation aka monster. It's a predators dream.

I'm quite certain it's dead. It's tough, but it's not invincible. I would agree that it's not a dinosaur. It never existed during the Mesozoic and it doesn't fit the definition of a dinosaur: an animal that lived on land during the Mesozoic Period, a member of the dinosauria.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomorphine on Jun 26, 2015, 01:47:14 PM
Quote from: szkoki on Jun 26, 2015, 12:12:01 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDjEvsx4h6I

Heh! :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 26, 2015, 01:55:17 PM
http://www.zimbio.com/Web+LOLs/articles/oprunE1-cAy/Someone+Replaced+Jurassic+World+Dinosaurs

QuoteBut no successful pop culture event has truly reached its peaked until it's been spoofed by the greatest of all Internet memes: cats. That's where KhanandKittens comes in. The Tumblr blog has been replacing dinosaurs with cats in the Jurassic Park franchise for years, and now it's given Jurassic World the kitty treatment.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jun 27, 2015, 03:30:14 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 25, 2015, 10:18:05 PM
In hindsight, I feel kind of sorry for Indominus. Poor thing was a genetic freak, a Frankenstein Monster's...and ended up being the one who ultimately suffered because of human arrogance. What do you guys think?

I agree with you actually. Even though I was cheering for it to be taken down, once it got dragged down in the end it looked so helpless. My heart actually dropped a bit for it, even though I was totally excited about it at the same time. It looked pretty brutal how it was pulled into down and it did briefly cross my mind what a terrible life this thing had and then for it to be killed like that is horrifying.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 27, 2015, 05:23:18 AM
Well this is interesting. A new tidbit about TLW I never knew.

https://instagram.com/p/4a19IMTYhX/

Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jun 27, 2015, 03:30:14 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 25, 2015, 10:18:05 PM
In hindsight, I feel kind of sorry for Indominus. Poor thing was a genetic freak, a Frankenstein Monster's...and ended up being the one who ultimately suffered because of human arrogance. What do you guys think?

I agree with you actually. Even though I was cheering for it to be taken down, once it got dragged down in the end it looked so helpless. My heart actually dropped a bit for it, even though I was totally excited about it at the same time. It looked pretty brutal how it was pulled into down and it did briefly cross my mind what a terrible life this thing had and then for it to be killed like that is horrifying.

Another reason why humans need to be wary of too much science. Innocent creatures end up being hurt.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 27, 2015, 06:01:57 AM
Yea but we still don't know how smart it is. It may like it's new man-made abilities.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 27, 2015, 01:45:22 PM
And in the process, kill more people.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jun 27, 2015, 01:59:33 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pabK7LRANiU
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 27, 2015, 08:02:38 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 27, 2015, 05:23:18 AM
Well this is interesting. A new tidbit about TLW I never knew.

https://instagram.com/p/4a19IMTYhX/

Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jun 27, 2015, 03:30:14 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 25, 2015, 10:18:05 PM
In hindsight, I feel kind of sorry for Indominus. Poor thing was a genetic freak, a Frankenstein Monster's...and ended up being the one who ultimately suffered because of human arrogance. What do you guys think?

I agree with you actually. Even though I was cheering for it to be taken down, once it got dragged down in the end it looked so helpless. My heart actually dropped a bit for it, even though I was totally excited about it at the same time. It looked pretty brutal how it was pulled into down and it did briefly cross my mind what a terrible life this thing had and then for it to be killed like that is horrifying.

Another reason why humans need to be wary of too much science. Innocent creatures end up being hurt.

Science is like an ax, you can use it to kill people or to cut wood

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1371.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fag299%2Fenchiridion86%2F11694009_957995660906812_3931804952733755969_n_zpst1qg80o4.jpg&hash=e9ad5ae346a5b013feebf4ef83710e5c74ba3e4e)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 27, 2015, 08:20:12 PM
http://www.hitfix.com/harpy/jurassic-world-dinosaur-toys-genderswapped-to-male-because-of-course-they-were (http://www.hitfix.com/harpy/jurassic-world-dinosaur-toys-genderswapped-to-male-because-of-course-they-were)

I swear JW controversy gets dumber every time something new comes up. ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 27, 2015, 09:33:40 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 27, 2015, 08:20:12 PM
http://www.hitfix.com/harpy/jurassic-world-dinosaur-toys-genderswapped-to-male-because-of-course-they-were (http://www.hitfix.com/harpy/jurassic-world-dinosaur-toys-genderswapped-to-male-because-of-course-they-were)

I swear JW controversy gets dumber every time something new comes up. ::)

I think Omegamorph hit the spot:

QuoteEverything is sexist racist classist etc nowadays. Get used to it.

Quote from: Vertigo on Jun 26, 2015, 10:53:15 AM
Palaeontologist Mark Witton doodling about the fine art of Velociraptor taming:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CIVeLBuWIAASDYw.jpg

Great find. I am one of the few who want to see feathered maniraptorans  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 28, 2015, 12:14:30 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 27, 2015, 08:20:12 PM
http://www.hitfix.com/harpy/jurassic-world-dinosaur-toys-genderswapped-to-male-because-of-course-they-were (http://www.hitfix.com/harpy/jurassic-world-dinosaur-toys-genderswapped-to-male-because-of-course-they-were)

I swear JW controversy gets dumber every time something new comes up. ::)

You should've seen the stink this raised on Facebook. Holy shit, and it was coming from people WITHIN the scientific community. How did the people working in a profession based around logic and evidence become so stupid?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 28, 2015, 02:33:38 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 28, 2015, 12:14:30 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 27, 2015, 08:20:12 PM
http://www.hitfix.com/harpy/jurassic-world-dinosaur-toys-genderswapped-to-male-because-of-course-they-were (http://www.hitfix.com/harpy/jurassic-world-dinosaur-toys-genderswapped-to-male-because-of-course-they-were)

I swear JW controversy gets dumber every time something new comes up. ::)

You should've seen the stink this raised on Facebook. Holy shit, and it was coming from people WITHIN the scientific community. How did the people working in a profession based around logic and evidence become so stupid?
Dude, I need just one word to explain this.

PROMETHEUS

:laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 28, 2015, 03:12:04 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VXIEA_U2QY
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 28, 2015, 02:14:42 PM
Lol, I loved the sloth. Though they could've put in a Smilodon for the scare effect.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomorphine on Jun 28, 2015, 03:42:20 PM
Impressive Goldblum impression, there!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 28, 2015, 04:32:39 PM
Top 2015 Movies
1.   Jurassic World   $500,100,000
2.   Avengers: Age of Ultron   $452,428,000
3.   Furious 7   $351,032,910


DOMESTIC GROSSES

1    Avatar    Fox    $760,507,625    2009^
2    Titanic    Par.    $658,672,302    1997^
3    Marvel's The Avengers    BV    $623,357,910    2012
4    The Dark Knight    WB    $534,858,444    2008^
7    Jurassic World    Uni.    $500,100,000    2015
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jun 28, 2015, 05:20:25 PM
This news locks in another decade of giant monster movies. More Dinosaurs, Godzilla, Kaiju, and other hopefully original monster on the loose films.

I want a period remake of Vally of Gwangi

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F38.media.tumblr.com%2Fbd331ab02dfa43dfe09e31ff343631d5%2Ftumblr_n2i6g7WUND1s2wio8o1_500.gif&hash=9f1a87af304ce316380dbd09ea22ba524d676139)
(https://38.media.tumblr.com/a8e92062e7739c02d9b581ab431593f9/tumblr_mzs7ik1TVa1qedb29o1_r1_500.gif)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F38.media.tumblr.com%2F9c8596795a7859dadf17390d92adc358%2Ftumblr_nmjcl9hmsU1qbefzbo1_500.gif&hash=5e0e925e4749e89745d98b219aaa6d49c1b60c34)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 28, 2015, 05:54:23 PM
Oh you have no idea how much I've wanted a remake of The Valley of Gwangi over the years. I've sketched several Gwangi designs for it (modifying his species and making it some kind of advanced Carcharodontosaurid or Allosaurid that has evolved in the meantime into a new form). Harryhausen never really described Gwangi as 'just' a Tyrannosaurus or 'just' an Allosaurus. Makes sense for him to be a Carnosaur that evolved within his environment (the confined valley).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 29, 2015, 12:02:06 PM
I'm currently working on a script for an abandoned project that O'Brien and Harryhausen worked on together back in the 50s. It was called The Valley of the Mist and it was the film that eventually became Gwangi. The concept art was pretty cool.

http://www.rayharryhausen.com/biography.php
QuoteThis project was never realised even though Ray worked with Obie on the concept for some time.

Ray executed three large drawings of a pterodactyl being roped by natives, an allosaurus (the proposed star of the project) attacked by a triceratops and the same allosaurus killing the triceratops and being attacked by natives.  Ray never showed these drawings to Obie for fear that he wouldn't like them.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 29, 2015, 12:34:08 PM
FINALLY got around to seeing Jurassic World. Talk about the ultimate nostalgia trip (though it was also pretty relevant in some of its major themes as well). It was like I was five years old again! Jurassic Park is the film that made me want to be a paleontologist as a kid, and soon after it became one of the films that made me want to make movies myself. I definitely see this movie recapturing that same magic for today's audience, and am extremely pleased to see it doing as well as it has been doing. Jurassic World isn't perfect, but it really didn't have to be. I walked out of the theater with a giant smile on my face and felt like a little kid again, and at the end of the day that's what really matters.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 29, 2015, 01:34:13 PM
I had a feeling you'd enjoy it. Which scene was your favourite?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Jun 29, 2015, 08:13:08 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 29, 2015, 12:34:08 PM
FINALLY got around to seeing Jurassic World. Talk about the ultimate nostalgia trip (though it was also pretty relevant in some of its major themes as well). It was like I was five years old again! Jurassic Park is the film that made me want to be a paleontologist as a kid, and soon after it became one of the films that made me want to make movies myself. I definitely see this movie recapturing that same magic for today's audience, and am extremely pleased to see it doing as well as it has been doing. Jurassic World isn't perfect, but it really didn't have to be. I walked out of the theater with a giant smile on my face and felt like a little kid again, and at the end of the day that's what really matters.
exactly how i feel  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jun 29, 2015, 08:44:05 PM
A proper Carnosaur adaption would be cool too. Even a better adaption of A Sound of Thunder is welcome as well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 30, 2015, 10:48:14 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 29, 2015, 12:34:08 PM
FINALLY got around to seeing Jurassic World. Talk about the ultimate nostalgia trip (though it was also pretty relevant in some of its major themes as well). It was like I was five years old again! Jurassic Park is the film that made me want to be a paleontologist as a kid, and soon after it became one of the films that made me want to make movies myself. I definitely see this movie recapturing that same magic for today's audience, and am extremely pleased to see it doing as well as it has been doing. Jurassic World isn't perfect, but it really didn't have to be. I walked out of the theater with a giant smile on my face and felt like a little kid again, and at the end of the day that's what really matters.

Glad you enjoyed it dude!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 30, 2015, 12:25:34 PM
Check out my entry for the JurassicJune Selfie contest:

https://instagram.com/p/4iJkfQlEsT/?taken-by=jpfan4life
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 30, 2015, 04:19:14 PM
Love these!

Spoiler

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F38.media.tumblr.com%2F5c8ff4759ceb138fc15f61f6fcb91f85%2Ftumblr_nqopln7NDU1rrygyoo3_250.gif&hash=3247a0afea2a1f1cd6e3f18e6f55cbf1c0a5f01b)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F38.media.tumblr.com%2Fe60b8058a471f5457a7b4a3794446ef3%2Ftumblr_nqopln7NDU1rrygyoo5_250.gif&hash=38ffd0bf0f03f0621f99f504be2498bcc3c2ec7e)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F33.media.tumblr.com%2F1d056c4446ec3da98f8358649dfeb58f%2Ftumblr_nqopln7NDU1rrygyoo6_250.gif&hash=b05705615f27fc6b2f3986e36de4bfca1e2380a4)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F31.media.tumblr.com%2F640313b2784b23ff69d1eab2556dc70d%2Ftumblr_nqopln7NDU1rrygyoo8_250.gif&hash=28543bb7f3b77bb03b1a3933cd480270d776c88d)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 30, 2015, 04:39:55 PM
I'M A MOTHAf**kIN' T.REX!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 30, 2015, 05:29:42 PM
Some comparisons I made...

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi61.tinypic.com%2Feftwz.jpg&hash=c1304c0fe6d008b294809014ab7d99096b71fde1)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 30, 2015, 06:08:48 PM
She looks better on the right.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on Jun 30, 2015, 06:17:04 PM
Much better.

Didn't like the T-Rex in this too much in terms of looks, motion, roars and character.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jun 30, 2015, 06:26:22 PM
Taking just the bottom two pairs of images, I think part of the issue is that everything around them looks fake too. In the earlier films, at least the surrounding props and scenery were real.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 30, 2015, 06:40:43 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Jun 30, 2015, 06:26:22 PM
Taking just the bottom two pairs of images, I think part of the issue is that everything around them looks fake too. In the earlier films, at least the surrounding props and scenery were real.

The spino skeleton/rex pic is on a set.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jun 30, 2015, 07:40:10 PM
That Rex isn't a charging animatronic though. If it is, I'd be very shocked.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 30, 2015, 08:18:34 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 30, 2015, 07:40:10 PM
That Rex isn't a charging animatronic though.

No one was talking about animatronics. HuDaFuk was talking about CG environments. ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 01, 2015, 12:02:19 AM
It still looks awful, or at least less than realistic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vermillion on Jul 01, 2015, 04:10:03 AM
Saw it tonight.

Loved it. 

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jul 01, 2015, 07:21:56 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 30, 2015, 05:29:42 PM
Some comparisons I made...

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi61.tinypic.com%2Feftwz.jpg&hash=c1304c0fe6d008b294809014ab7d99096b71fde1)
[close]
Only difference I cared about was how the jaw seems to open much wider now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 01, 2015, 08:11:09 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jul 01, 2015, 07:21:56 AM
Only difference I cared about was how the jaw seems to open much wider now.

I noticed this but then looking at images like these shows they could open their jaws pretty wide.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.inquisitr.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F11%2FT-Rex.png&hash=73d49a29277b618ed56b8931e0ce7055994d44c6)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic1.1.sqspcdn.com%2Fstatic%2Ff%2F709071%2F22380325%2F1365206706160%2Fjpvfx_trex.jpg%3Ftoken%3DzlH8lZ2a9G1hRQEO7n8a1NBoVJI%253D&hash=563ab2d1fa588e9ed65798108c1f2bc52bb08879)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jurassicworlduniverse.com%2Fwordpress%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F01%2Ftyrannosaurusrex-03.jpg&hash=6cafc6a9a492f1ea1d53e0c39390b1f64f214182)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn2-b.examiner.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fstyles%2Fimage_content_width%2Fhash%2Fd9%2Fa3%2Fd9a39d89d4144cd8275525d74075bece.jpg%3Fitok%3DkUEAJnnq&hash=a97d8cce5f0ba11812827e8f568c16e7810caf3a)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2F12lhm5q5TCo%2Fmaxresdefault.jpg&hash=a3f4ceb2507b060cf2477170304f5354b5c6d913)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fklipd.com%2Fscreenshots%2F42a428d16b4c83d8ca9c47ba15303da8-1.jpg&hash=dc8a03336579fa2618a77ac6f937ca54314c64eb)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jul 01, 2015, 08:17:36 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 01, 2015, 08:11:09 AM(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jurassicworlduniverse.com%2Fwordpress%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F01%2Ftyrannosaurusrex-03.jpg&hash=6cafc6a9a492f1ea1d53e0c39390b1f64f214182)

I freaking love that shot.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 01, 2015, 08:21:05 AM
Yeah, has to be my favourite animatronic shot from JP one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Le Celticant on Jul 01, 2015, 10:28:11 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 30, 2015, 06:08:48 PM
She looks better on the right.

Probably because the shots are awfully framed (issue 101 with every movie).
Not everyone is spielberg and managed to tell a story with one frame like a painting.
What usually happens is director trying to overdo (saturate image infos, loud music with violin to make sure you cry... because of the music  ;) because nobody cared about bob death  :D and make sure to do slow motion so all the audience sees him die slowly, you know, like accurate death, people never die in an instant stupidly)

In a theoretical model, the T-Rex in JP world should look a lot better than the one from JP one in terms of animations.
A lot has happened in the VFX world (ILM being for something ya know...) since. Now the character should have very accurate muscles, skin distortion...
Yet the behaving of the thing on screen is so unimpressive compared to the performance it delivered in the first film since it has a 5 minutes screen time and has the only purpose of fighting the indominus Rex in a titan clash which is... over-doing the fight and feel closer to a MMA fight than animals trying to eat each other.

Problem 101 with CGI isn't CGI being real or not, it's: Is the action real or not?
It's like everyfilmaker think: "Oh! We can make a T-Rex in CGI? Okay let's make it fly and poop rainbow!!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on Jul 01, 2015, 10:34:49 AM
My favourite story when it comes to the effects in Jurassic Park is how they kept having to slow the T-Rex's running speed down when it's chasing the Jeep because it didn't look right when it ran too quickly.

You don't get that these days. If they wanted a Rex running at 60mph they'd get it, whether it looked right or not.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 01, 2015, 11:43:19 AM
Why is there no weight to the animals' movement when it comes to CG usage these days? Is it just a case of lazy filmmaking?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jul 01, 2015, 11:55:20 AM
As others have said before, it all comes back to Goldblum's "could/should" statement. Because of the nature of it, it seems to be easier to go overboard with CGI than it would if you were building models and animatronics.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 01, 2015, 03:47:55 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 01, 2015, 11:43:19 AM
Why is there no weight to the animals' movement when it comes to CG usage these days? Is it just a case of lazy filmmaking?
Most animators nowadays don't have a background in stop-motion. Think that's a big issue.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 01, 2015, 03:49:15 PM
Quote from: Omegamorph on Jul 01, 2015, 03:47:55 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 01, 2015, 11:43:19 AM
Why is there no weight to the animals' movement when it comes to CG usage these days? Is it just a case of lazy filmmaking?
Most animators nowadays don't have a background in stop-motion. Think that's a big issue.

How would that make a difference?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 01, 2015, 04:36:10 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 01, 2015, 11:43:19 AM
Why is there no weight to the animals' movement when it comes to CG usage these days? Is it just a case of lazy filmmaking?

There is plenty of weight. Some of the best uses of CG weight recently has been JW, Prometheus and Pacific Rim.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 01, 2015, 04:37:39 PM
Eh, I have to disagree. I can't see an animal as big as a T.rex moving as fluidly as it did in JW. In Jurassic Park, it just felt bigger and heavier.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Le Celticant on Jul 01, 2015, 05:58:05 PM
Quote from: Omegamorph on Jul 01, 2015, 03:47:55 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 01, 2015, 11:43:19 AM
Why is there no weight to the animals' movement when it comes to CG usage these days? Is it just a case of lazy filmmaking?
Most animators nowadays don't have a background in stop-motion. Think that's a big issue.

Nope, most famous animation school (and most guys from ILM, WETA, PIXAR & Dreamworks comes from this school) have stop motion courses.

Also something you don't realize is that when doing animation you actually do something close to stop motion called "Blocking" which is a pose of the strongest moment in the animation.
But again, if your director tells you that your dinosaur are going to make a titan fight and smash through concrete you are completely going to loose sense of weight because it is physically inaccurate.

The action is always the main problem. When you look at the first JP, no offense intended, but the CGI looks pretty bad compared to today standard (gamma problem in the compositing, lack of realistic motion blur and depth of field, no muscle/skin distortion matching anatomy) but it still works (even better than today) because it didn't ask the raptor to make a 10000 mile jump or the T-Rex to smash the great pyramid of Gizeh.

And it doesn't incorporate senseless thing from the dinosaur like the Spinosaurus... who couldn't go through two trees but could easily break through a fence of hard metal and concrete and yet being unable to break then a thin metal door or the roof of the house in JP3 in the phone ringing funny scene.  ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 01, 2015, 06:23:48 PM
Quote from: Le Celticant on Jul 01, 2015, 05:58:05 PM
Quote from: Omegamorph on Jul 01, 2015, 03:47:55 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 01, 2015, 11:43:19 AM
Why is there no weight to the animals' movement when it comes to CG usage these days? Is it just a case of lazy filmmaking?
Most animators nowadays don't have a background in stop-motion. Think that's a big issue.

Nope, most famous animation school (and most guys from ILM, WETA, PIXAR & Dreamworks comes from this school) have stop motion courses.

Also something you don't realize is that when doing animation you actually do something close to stop motion called "Blocking" which is a pose of the strongest moment in the animation.
But again, if your director tells you that your dinosaur are going to make a titan fight and smash through concrete you are completely going to loose sense of weight because it is physically inaccurate.

The action is always the main problem. When you look at the first JP, no offense intended, but the CGI looks pretty bad compared to today standard (gamma problem in the compositing, lack of realistic motion blur and depth of field, no muscle/skin distortion matching anatomy) but it still works (even better than today) because it didn't ask the raptor to make a 10000 mile jump or the T-Rex to smash the great pyramid of Gizeh.

And it doesn't incorporate senseless thing from the dinosaur like the Spinosaurus... who couldn't go through two trees but could easily break through a fence of hard metal and concrete and yet being unable to break then a thin metal door or the roof of the house in JP3 in the phone ringing funny scene.  ::)

I agree with what you're saying. Just on the Spinosaurus and the trees, my guess is that the canopy was thick enough to keep a large theropod out. It's not that unrealistic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 01, 2015, 06:47:42 PM
I'll be live in 15 mins talking Jurassic World...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VsF6dZnmNLA
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Le Celticant on Jul 01, 2015, 07:03:34 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 01, 2015, 06:23:48 PM
I agree with what you're saying. Just on the Spinosaurus and the trees, my guess is that the canopy was thick enough to keep a large theropod out. It's not that unrealistic.

True, you are  ;) but it still affect your brain in a certain way by repeating the same action which ends up differently. It's more a story problem I guess, just a badly written action.

Spoiler
The indominus in this film looked physically way too off.
The film got me worried when he made concrete explode at the door when he passed through and threw the car away like paper to kill the guy.
At least in JP the T-rex, despite being a very strong dinosaur still had to use strength to move the car on its back and the car felt like a car, not like paper.
[close]
The T-rex could do it, but still, the car wasn't paper to it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 01, 2015, 07:20:50 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 01, 2015, 06:47:42 PM
I'll be live in 15 mins talking Jurassic World...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VsF6dZnmNLA

I caught a few minutes (obviously lol). Good stuff mate, but I have to run. I'll watch the whole thing later on :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jul 01, 2015, 07:30:42 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jun 28, 2015, 02:14:42 PM
Lol, I loved the sloth. Though they could've put in a Smilodon for the scare effect.

Some pre-Trassic animals are pretty deadly.  Dimetrodon where pretty deadly from what I can remember. You also had early sea animals like Pterygotus, Dunkleosteus, and Jaekelopterus
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 02, 2015, 11:28:58 AM
Dunkleosteus! I love me some placoderms.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on Jul 02, 2015, 11:49:43 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 01, 2015, 11:43:19 AM
Why is there no weight to the animals' movement when it comes to CG usage these days? Is it just a case of lazy filmmaking?
Lazy audiences.

Where dodgy, unconvincing effects would ruin effects pictures, they're perfectly fine these days so long as the spectacle itself is big enough. The CGI gets more and more technically accomplished -- better shaders, better movements, better textures, etc. -- but the people in control of them have become convinced (and the public financially backed up the idea) that "The only limit is your imagination!" is actually a good mantra to have.

The CGI in JW is beautiful, but it's not the least convincing. You still watch JP and feel like you're watching dinosaurs. You watch JW and feel you're watching CGI dinosaurs. Big difference.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jul 02, 2015, 11:52:46 AM
Quote from: SiL on Jul 02, 2015, 11:49:43 AMThe CGI in JW is beautiful, but it's not the least convincing. You still watch JP and feel like you're watching dinosaurs. You watch JW and feel you're watching CGI dinosaurs. Big difference.

Yeah, this. Somewhere along the way, something got lost.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2015, 12:06:45 PM
Quote from: SiL on Jul 02, 2015, 11:49:43 AM
The CGI in JW is beautiful, but it's not the least convincing.

I guess that boils down to how invested you are in the storytelling.

I personally was convinced by them as living, breathing characters in the new movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 02, 2015, 12:25:55 PM
Quote from: SiL on Jul 02, 2015, 11:49:43 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 01, 2015, 11:43:19 AM
Why is there no weight to the animals' movement when it comes to CG usage these days? Is it just a case of lazy filmmaking?
Lazy audiences.

Where dodgy, unconvincing effects would ruin effects pictures, they're perfectly fine these days so long as the spectacle itself is big enough. The CGI gets more and more technically accomplished -- better shaders, better movements, better textures, etc. -- but the people in control of them have become convinced (and the public financially backed up the idea) that "The only limit is your imagination!" is actually a good mantra to have.

The CGI in JW is beautiful, but it's not the least convincing. You still watch JP and feel like you're watching dinosaurs. You watch JW and feel you're watching CGI dinosaurs. Big difference.

So what's the solution?

Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2015, 12:06:45 PM
Quote from: SiL on Jul 02, 2015, 11:49:43 AM
The CGI in JW is beautiful, but it's not the least convincing.

I guess that boils down to how invested you are in the storytelling.

I personally was convinced by them as living, breathing characters in the new movie.

I was and I wasn't. I bought that they were made to look that way but they didn't feel that way. I didn't feel as though I could reach out and touch them.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2015, 12:46:52 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 02, 2015, 12:25:55 PM
I didn't feel as though I could reach out and touch them.

Man during these scenes I really felt like I could touch them.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.joblo.com%2Fnewsimages1%2Fjurassic-world-blue.JPG&hash=6d5d622b089dfe1a9e4d8435f505f17a2d0caf72)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 02, 2015, 01:00:00 PM
Even those moments didn't look that good. I know they were animatronics but they still looked fake. I can't recall which reviewer said it, but it's like CG effects were imposed onto them because the director wanted them to have more facial expressions.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jul 02, 2015, 01:01:21 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2015, 12:46:52 PMMan during these scenes I really felt like I could touch them.

I didn't. I thought they looked noticeably artificial.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2015, 01:05:24 PM
Well of course they look artificial because they are.

They look no more real than this for example...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scifinow.co.uk%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F05%2Ftalos-01.jpg&hash=9dd7dc1c8dff4bd21c20ab0fcc0f2155edcc7f65)

I really believe its down to how invested you are in everything that is at play, not just how real the effects are.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jul 02, 2015, 01:07:54 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2015, 01:05:24 PMWell of course they look artificial because they are.

Yes, but it stood out how artificial they were. I was acutely aware that they were not real.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jul 02, 2015, 01:12:11 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2015, 12:46:52 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 02, 2015, 12:25:55 PM
I didn't feel as though I could reach out and touch them.

Man during these scenes I really felt like I could touch them.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.joblo.com%2Fnewsimages1%2Fjurassic-world-blue.JPG&hash=6d5d622b089dfe1a9e4d8435f505f17a2d0caf72)

I'm with you here. I thought these moments looked gorgeous.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 02, 2015, 01:24:41 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Jul 02, 2015, 01:07:54 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2015, 01:05:24 PMWell of course they look artificial because they are.

Yes, but it stood out how artificial they were. I was acutely aware that they were not real.

This. They looked plastic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2015, 01:38:29 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 02, 2015, 01:24:41 PM
This. They looked plastic.

Nowadays most people know the basics of how an effect is achieved before they even enter the theatre to watch the film they're seeing. This is why some say modern effects are not amazing (when what they are seeing are leaps and bounds ahead of what came before) because the mystery is gone.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 02, 2015, 01:40:12 PM
It may be leaps and bounds ahead on a technical level but that doesn't mean it's pleasing to the eye. The Hobbit was presented in 48 FPS in IMAX but it looked awful to me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2015, 01:42:18 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 02, 2015, 01:40:12 PM
It may be leaps and bounds ahead on a technical level but that doesn't mean it's pleasing to the eye.

I would argue on a visual level also. But this would descend into yet another CGI debate on the net.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Le Celticant on Jul 02, 2015, 02:40:11 PM
Understand that not only CGI ruins itself.
The actor performance has this mystical power too.

And sometimes the actor's performance is not only enough and can be ruined by the very root of the script.
JPWorld has more actions scene that shows the character being badass than revealing their personalities.
And in that moment you can't build in your mind what kind of character he is:
-A Real Badass.
-A dinosaur care-taker.

Great thing in the first thing was that no one was a badass beside Robert Muldoon. And even him was explicitly explaining that despite his skill, he is afraid of the raptors.
You got scene in the first film were Malcom would do something stupid to attract the T-Rex with a flare and ends up with a broken leg. He isn't a super hero. He can be broken like every human. You end up believing that the T-Rex IS a real threat.
That way you feel connected to the character because the film allow you to think that it could be you at that very moment and not some ideal character that is totally perfect who manages everything perfectly fine and when he can't anymore a simple lucky thing happens for him that sounds more like a joke.
When you have a badass character it never allows you to feel fear, joy, anxiety...
You can't feel it is real, you feel it is funny and badass but at no moment you feel in danger.

Spoiler
So yeah, when Chris Pratt character is petting raptors you don't feel it's the dinosaur care-taker doing it but the badass who gonna unleash hell to the indominus and that kind connection between the two characters is pointless because the raptor ends up as tool and "cool figures" for hunting rather than a living breathing animal. CGI or animatronic, it ends up the same way.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2015, 04:58:41 PM
Quote from: Le Celticant on Jul 02, 2015, 02:40:11 PM
Spoiler
So yeah, when Chris Pratt character is petting raptors you don't feel it's the dinosaur care-taker doing it but the badass who gonna unleash hell to the indominus and that kind connection between the two characters is pointless because the raptor ends up as tool and "cool figures" for hunting rather than a living breathing animal. CGI or animatronic, it ends up the same way.
[close]

Really? I felt loads for the raptors and didn't see them as tools or cool figures. That is what they were in Hoskin's eyes.  They felt very alive and sympathetic as characters. Especially in moments like...

Spoiler
Charlie being blown up after having that subtle moment with Owen.
[close]

and

Spoiler
Blue allowing Owen to remove the head cam.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 02, 2015, 05:00:59 PM
The first scene didn't make much sense to me. Only seconds earlier, they were ready to rip Owen apart and suddenly Charlie is having a change of heart? How?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2015, 05:09:07 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 02, 2015, 05:00:59 PM
The first scene didn't make much sense to me. Only seconds earlier, they were ready to rip Owen apart and suddenly Charlie is having a change of heart? How?

Conflicted loyalty man. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vermillion on Jul 02, 2015, 05:29:45 PM
The raptor's heads seem to change their size throughout the movie. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 02, 2015, 05:45:55 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2015, 05:09:07 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 02, 2015, 05:00:59 PM
The first scene didn't make much sense to me. Only seconds earlier, they were ready to rip Owen apart and suddenly Charlie is having a change of heart? How?

Conflicted loyalty man. ;)

Riiiiiiight.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2015, 05:51:26 PM
Right.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-TIbCeI18qoU%2FTof71mvm7AI%2FAAAAAAAACfo%2F80VPUPRljzI%2Fs1600%2Fbrett.jpg&hash=aa302b915fe92c1b0175c275f7a9bb09081d1833)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 02, 2015, 05:58:47 PM
Quote from: Vermillion on Jul 02, 2015, 05:29:45 PM
The raptor's heads seem to change their size throughout the movie.

Nah, that was just the camera angles. The Rex head in the first JP did the same thing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Jul 03, 2015, 05:49:21 AM
Don't think anyone posted this yet. I know a bunch of people here don't like nostalgia critic but I find him funny, he's obviously going to take shots at the film so keep your nickers unbunched! At least watch him talk about the final fight scene.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6umfTLuCI8
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Jul 03, 2015, 06:04:10 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJTaVFX4HFY
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alienseseses on Jul 03, 2015, 06:09:42 AM
...why the hell make a response like that? Just seems petty.

His review is pretty funny.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Jul 03, 2015, 06:24:25 AM
lol! wow... someone's titties got twisted to make a video like that! :laugh: I can't say it's not wrong, but it's a bit hypocritical... doing the same things it's accusing NC of doing. (crying mainly)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 03, 2015, 06:41:47 AM
Quote from: frenchfries on Jul 03, 2015, 06:04:10 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJTaVFX4HFY

:D ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jul 03, 2015, 06:58:45 AM
The review was funny but f**k the guy; JW's CGi was awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 03, 2015, 07:03:31 AM
The it about him being desperate for clicks is undeniably true. He's basically been reviewing anything regardless of age ever since Demo Reel tanked and he had to start up NC again. Reviewing JW before its even finished its theatrical run is the most ridiculously desperate move yet. I thought the recent review of Jupiter Ascending reeked of desperation, but this takes the f**king cake. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Wrecktangle on Jul 03, 2015, 07:16:02 AM
Andy Buckley needs to be in more things.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jul 03, 2015, 07:46:38 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2015, 05:09:07 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 02, 2015, 05:00:59 PM
The first scene didn't make much sense to me. Only seconds earlier, they were ready to rip Owen apart and suddenly Charlie is having a change of heart? How?

Conflicted loyalty man. ;)

That's how I feel too. I think in containment Blue had a sense of wanting to become the Alpha and take down Pratt. But after being free for a bit and seeing how much of assholes other huans are, it kinda looks at him in a different way. At least enough to doubt about killing the human they imprinted on. And then he gives them the proof he doesn't mean them harm.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jul 03, 2015, 08:09:23 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jul 03, 2015, 07:46:38 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2015, 05:09:07 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 02, 2015, 05:00:59 PM
The first scene didn't make much sense to me. Only seconds earlier, they were ready to rip Owen apart and suddenly Charlie is having a change of heart? How?

Conflicted loyalty man. ;)

That's how I feel too. I think in containment Blue had a sense of wanting to become the Alpha and take down Pratt. But after being free for a bit and seeing how much of assholes other huans are, it kinda looks at him in a different way. At least enough to doubt about killing the human they imprinted on. And then he gives them the proof he doesn't mean them harm.
You're giving the animal too much humanity.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jul 03, 2015, 08:33:23 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jul 03, 2015, 08:09:23 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jul 03, 2015, 07:46:38 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2015, 05:09:07 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 02, 2015, 05:00:59 PM
The first scene didn't make much sense to me. Only seconds earlier, they were ready to rip Owen apart and suddenly Charlie is having a change of heart? How?

Conflicted loyalty man. ;)

That's how I feel too. I think in containment Blue had a sense of wanting to become the Alpha and take down Pratt. But after being free for a bit and seeing how much of assholes other huans are, it kinda looks at him in a different way. At least enough to doubt about killing the human they imprinted on. And then he gives them the proof he doesn't mean them harm.
You're giving the animal too much humanity.

No the movie did. They are super intelligent anyways.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 03, 2015, 11:29:10 AM
It's still just an animal. Also if that's the case, why did she try to kill Barry?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Jul 03, 2015, 06:23:27 PM
barrys not the alpha.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on Jul 03, 2015, 07:36:44 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jul 03, 2015, 08:33:23 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jul 03, 2015, 08:09:23 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jul 03, 2015, 07:46:38 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2015, 05:09:07 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 02, 2015, 05:00:59 PM
The first scene didn't make much sense to me. Only seconds earlier, they were ready to rip Owen apart and suddenly Charlie is having a change of heart? How?

Conflicted loyalty man. ;)

That's how I feel too. I think in containment Blue had a sense of wanting to become the Alpha and take down Pratt. But after being free for a bit and seeing how much of assholes other huans are, it kinda looks at him in a different way. At least enough to doubt about killing the human they imprinted on. And then he gives them the proof he doesn't mean them harm.
You're giving the animal too much humanity.

No the movie did. They are super intelligent anyways.

They are intelligent... but not super intellilgent at all. Dolphin's behave far more social and clever compared to these fake raptors and not even Dolphins are considered super intelligent. Hell, the raptors could even be manipulated so easily by the indominus rex.

These raptors have basic intelligence that is markably higher than other dinosaurs/reptiles and mammals... but by no means were they super intelligent.

They were still primitive beasts by the very definition.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 03, 2015, 09:03:54 PM
Quote from: frenchfries on Jul 03, 2015, 06:23:27 PM
barrys not the alpha.
That he was able to get so close to them without Blue or Delta snapping at him in the pen means they had some kind of relationship with them. He wasn't the alpha but they respected him enough to let him get close.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 04, 2015, 02:55:22 AM
As many here know (or know now ;) ), July 4th is my traditional Jurassic Park day after the other July 4th traditions. This will be the first one in which I can view a new chapter in the series. I have tried my best to avoid spoilers until now and tomorrow I will finally get to see Jurassic World in it's entirety. While I hope for the best (storyline wise), I am prepared for not such the best too. I will post my own review soon after watching it (along with the other classic films and that red headed stepchild known as JP3 :P ). Have a great Jurassic 4th everyone! See y'all tomorrow!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Jul 04, 2015, 05:38:58 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jun 20, 2015, 08:24:03 AM
Or you could just go for a small relative, they weren't all gigantic.

Europasaurus was a Brachiosaurus-like animal that maxed at the size of a large horse, Turanoceratops was a 175-kilo Triceratops relative (and some more primitive ceratopsians were cat-size), Dilong was a tyrannosauroid the size of a dog, Saurornitholestes was a raptor the size of a large cat.

That's like telling someone who wants a real cloned miniature Lion to go buy a house cat
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jul 04, 2015, 07:42:22 AM
Well... yeah... why would you want a cloned miniature lion? The whole point of wanting a big cat is to want a cat that is big. Otherwise you might as well just have a cat.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Jul 04, 2015, 10:06:25 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 04, 2015, 07:42:22 AM
Well... yeah... why would you want a cloned miniature lion? The whole point of wanting a big cat is to want a cat that is big. Otherwise you might as well just have a cat.

It's probably the type of thing that if someone doesn't understand already then there's no way to explain it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 04, 2015, 03:33:53 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 04, 2015, 02:55:22 AM
As many here know (or know now ;) ), July 4th is my traditional Jurassic Park day after the other July 4th traditions. This will be the first one in which I can view a new chapter in the series. I have tried my best to avoid spoilers until now and tomorrow I will finally get to see Jurassic World in it's entirety. While I hope for the best (storyline wise), I am prepared for not such the best too. I will post my own review soon after watching it (along with the other classic films and that red headed stepchild known as JP3 :P ). Have a great Jurassic 4th everyone! See y'all tomorrow!

I think you're really going to enjoy it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 05, 2015, 04:57:38 AM
Finally, I have witnessed Jurassic World AND in 3D (my 1st ever expierence). While it is not fair to compare this film to the classic Jurassic Park, it was very good IMO. The visual effects were well done (ESP in 3D), the little homage things were noticed that us fans can tell very easy, the characters were ok and the final 20 minutes were indeed fantastic. Don't know why so many of y'all are hatin on this movie; it had some meh moments but come on, overall I thought it was very good. The eventual sequel should (hopefully) have a neat storyline...

I thought of DoomRulz immediately when
Spoiler
the guy said he paid 150$ on eBay for a Jurassic Park shirt ;)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 05, 2015, 05:06:31 AM
Ha! Yeah, I kind of figured that line was a nod to us collectors. We're a rabid bunch.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Jul 05, 2015, 10:36:26 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 04, 2015, 07:42:22 AM
Well... yeah... why would you want a cloned miniature lion? The whole point of wanting a big cat is to want a cat that is big. Otherwise you might as well just have a cat.

Something tells me they would be popular in like Japan. They love cute tiny versions of things.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jul 05, 2015, 08:41:16 PM
Quote from: Tangakkai on Jul 03, 2015, 07:36:44 PM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jul 03, 2015, 08:33:23 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jul 03, 2015, 08:09:23 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jul 03, 2015, 07:46:38 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2015, 05:09:07 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 02, 2015, 05:00:59 PM
The first scene didn't make much sense to me. Only seconds earlier, they were ready to rip Owen apart and suddenly Charlie is having a change of heart? How?

Conflicted loyalty man. ;)

That's how I feel too. I think in containment Blue had a sense of wanting to become the Alpha and take down Pratt. But after being free for a bit and seeing how much of assholes other huans are, it kinda looks at him in a different way. At least enough to doubt about killing the human they imprinted on. And then he gives them the proof he doesn't mean them harm.
You're giving the animal too much humanity.

No the movie did. They are super intelligent anyways.

They are intelligent... but not super intellilgent at all. Dolphin's behave far more social and clever compared to these fake raptors and not even Dolphins are considered super intelligent. Hell, the raptors could even be manipulated so easily by the indominus rex.

These raptors have basic intelligence that is markably higher than other dinosaurs/reptiles and mammals... but by no means were they super intelligent.

They were still primitive beasts by the very definition.
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 03, 2015, 11:29:10 AM
It's still just an animal. Also if that's the case, why did she try to kill Barry?

They're more intelligent than elephants, most likely. And these animals show wide ranges of emotion that are hard to believe "just an animal" can feel. They mourn and cry and consciously kill their own newborns just for the fact that they don't want to be parents. Infants even cry and get depressed when this happens and it happens in reverse when mother and son are separated and reunited again.

I know these animals are not even close to being similar, but if this can happen in real life I can imagine raptors can have conflicted emotions about their Alpha human who imprinted on them at birth. And maybe when Owen ran their instinct took over and won.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jul 05, 2015, 09:15:25 PM
JP's raptors have been portrayed as being among the world's smartest non-human animals since JP3. You can pretty much ascribe the full human emotional/rational gamut to them if you'd like, short of creating fire or building the Dino Pyramids. Just about everything that motivates us at a non-superficial level has been observed to some degree or another in fellow animals (including totally unrelated groups like dolphins and elephants, as mentioned).


Just to clarify though, we're only talking about the JP raptors. Intelligence estimates are currently one of the fuzziest areas of palaeontology - particularly when it comes to dinosaurs, because their physiology and brain structure changed so much down the various lineages, and there aren't really any good living analogues. Even Archaeopteryx was only around 80% of the way to an avian brain structure, and dromaeosaurs like Velociraptor were more like 30%.
The short answer to the question of "how smart were dinosaurs" is - we don't know.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 06, 2015, 01:06:03 AM
Well considering brain case scans of larger theropods don't outsize the largest birds, none of which have ever been witnessed opening a kitchen door, it's safe to say they weren't brainy. That doesn't mean they were stupid, but just smart for what they needed to do: catch and eat their prey.

Vertigo, you'll like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fo0CVHwmhqo
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jul 06, 2015, 02:23:43 AM
Well, birds generally aren't bad in terms of intelligence, and some of them are very smart - corvids (ravens, magpies etc) have incredibly advanced logical reasoning and use self-modified tools, Harris' hawks have sophisticated pack hunting and social behaviour, parrots have emotional development on par with a young human. Corvids in particular are often placed alongside great apes and cetaceans, they only seem to be lacking on the emotional side - give them a door they'd be physically capable of opening and they'd figure it out pretty quickly.

But no, you can't really assume much about dinosaurs. If you plot the encephalisation quotient (the best means of estimating intelligence based purely on physical remains) of a great white shark on the mammalian scale, it's below pretty much everything, a fraction of even a rabbit. Yet it's proven in the real world to have complex social interactions, advanced navigational ability, flexible hunting strategies for a variety of prey types, variable personality types, and most tellingly, they're very curious.

So, using brain comparisons to estimate intelligence becomes increasingly fuzzy, and eventually wholly erroneous, the further apart the animals are in relationship. This is because brain structure changes enormously through lineages, to cope with the demands of different physiology, different senses, or different lifestyle demands. Bird brains, for example, changed to cope with the demands of flight - the masses of sensory and locomotory data synchronisation they have to throughput to automate that process. Every living bird evolved from a flying ancestor, and they all had the same brain structure - but a structure that non-avian dinosaurs (even those closest to pygostylian birds) are proven to lack. That in itself doesn't necessarily make them any more or less smart, it just means they aren't directly comparable.

And they probably aren't directly comparable to reptiles either, because even the most basal dinosaurs had a greatly higher metabolism than any living reptile, which imposes more regulatory demands on the brain.
It's worth pointing out that Hobson's 1980s study, which assumed dinosaur brains were comparable to reptiles (and it's worth pointing out that most of them do seem similar to reptile brains), found that ceratopsians ranged from slightly below to equal with crocodiles, ornithopods equal or a bit higher, most theropods equal to double. Sauropods and thyreophorans were much lower, as you'd expect from famously "brain the size of a walnut" Stegosaurus.
Deinonychosaurs scored many times higher than crocs, which was the inspiration for Crichton's brainy Velociraptor. But we now know that their brain structure is 30% avian, which puts them in an awkward position of not being directly comparable either to birds, reptiles or other dinosaurs.

Also worth pointing out that the whole validity of EQs and brain-to-body-weight calculations are debated, as intelligence doesn't necessarily scale in direct accordance to cerebrum size, nor *precisely* to body weight (overall cerebral size is sometimes suggested to be a better indicator among primates).

But anyway. If we're talking overall brain size, some dino brains did outsize any bird's. Tyrannosaurus' brain was around a kilogram, larger than a gorilla's.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Le Celticant on Jul 06, 2015, 10:50:15 AM
It's impossible to estimates species' intelligence as it can greatly vary between individuals.
I have two cats, one can open the door (both pull and push) the other can't.
My grand parents had a cat who could only pull door.

You could say cats are intelligence because they can open door, but it's not true for all of them.
On the other side, my cats who can't open door has a social skill to call the other one to open the door for her.
But that doesn't mean all cats have this abilities, it just mean this one does.

I'm personally unable to tell you instantly the square root of all numbers from one to one thousand.
Some people can.
Some human have very strong social skill and some don't.

Then we are all subject to empirical thoughts but if I hadn't seen anyone open a door before, I'm not sure it wouldn't have take me a lot of time to figured it out. Maybe I would have got bored and would have never open it.
Same goes for language, the fact we can speak doesn't mean every human does if we aren't taught first.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on Jul 06, 2015, 11:28:10 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2015, 12:06:45 PM
I guess that boils down to how invested you are in the storytelling.

I personally was convinced by them as living, breathing characters in the new movie.
I really struggle to see how. That's not a slight on anyone: it's just me. The story never sells it to me.

Spoiler
They don't act like animals, they act like movie monsters. The movie makes a point that the iRex is a "monster" and the others are animals, but then they have the pterosaurs immediately attack people the second they're free (Were they starved in the aviary? Do they normally eat humans?), the velociraptors have switching "loyalties" (If a wolf walked up to a dog pack and tried to assert its dominance, the dog pack would at best force it into submission, worst kill it, not suddenly switch sides), and all we get out of the TRex is a boss fight which ends with her and the velociraptor having some bullshit moment of respect pass between them before walking off.

That's what the friggin' Predator does, not an animal.
[close]

They don't even seem to move right any more. The TRex and iRex really, really do not feel like they should be moving that way. It looks much too fast for something of that size and mass. All of the dinosaurs have this problem. They're too fluid.

I said it when the trailer came out and it was no better in the movie -- the hatching iRex may as well have been a 2D animation for all the realism it had to it. Tiny, newborn tendons don't move like that. Ever. They're twitchy. They're imprecise. Even animals that can walk moments after being born struggle in the first few moments. A tiny wire-controlled puppet 22 years ago was infinitely more convincing because it had the twitchy motions of an actual newborn.

The overall effect just wasn't convincing. There was nothing that let me ignore the fact I was looking at CGI.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jul 06, 2015, 11:35:52 AM
Quote from: SiL on Jul 06, 2015, 11:28:10 AM
Spoiler
They don't act like animals, they act like movie monsters. The movie makes a point that the iRex is a "monster" and the others are animals, but then they have the pterosaurs immediately attack people the second they're free (Were they starved in the aviary? Do they normally eat humans?), the velociraptors have switching "loyalties" (If a wolf walked up to a dog pack and tried to assert its dominance, the dog pack would at best force it into submission, worst kill it, not suddenly switch sides), and all we get out of the TRex is a boss fight which ends with her and the velociraptor having some bullshit moment of respect pass between them before walking off.

That's what the friggin' Predator does, not an animal.
[close]

This is a big part of the reason why I didn't go mad for the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 06, 2015, 12:03:35 PM
Quote from: SiL on Jul 06, 2015, 11:28:10 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 02, 2015, 12:06:45 PM
I guess that boils down to how invested you are in the storytelling.

I personally was convinced by them as living, breathing characters in the new movie.
I really struggle to see how. That's not a slight on anyone: it's just me. The story never sells it to me.

Spoiler
They don't act like animals, they act like movie monsters. The movie makes a point that the iRex is a "monster" and the others are animals, but then they have the pterosaurs immediately attack people the second they're free (Were they starved in the aviary? Do they normally eat humans?), the velociraptors have switching "loyalties" (If a wolf walked up to a dog pack and tried to assert its dominance, the dog pack would at best force it into submission, worst kill it, not suddenly switch sides), and all we get out of the TRex is a boss fight which ends with her and the velociraptor having some bullshit moment of respect pass between them before walking off.

That's what the friggin' Predator does, not an animal.
[close]

I attribute that to the film's complete lack of concern for the scientific aspect of it. Everyone's happy to see dinosaurs on screen but we still don't respect them enough to portray them properly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 06, 2015, 12:33:16 PM
Quote from: SiL on Jul 06, 2015, 11:28:10 AM
Spoiler
They don't act like animals, they act like movie monsters. The movie makes a point that the iRex is a "monster" and the others are animals, but then they have the pterosaurs immediately attack people the second they're free (Were they starved in the aviary? Do they normally eat humans?), the velociraptors have switching "loyalties" (If a wolf walked up to a dog pack and tried to assert its dominance, the dog pack would at best force it into submission, worst kill it, not suddenly switch sides), and all we get out of the TRex is a boss fight which ends with her and the velociraptor having some bullshit moment of respect pass between them before walking off.

That's what the friggin' Predator does, not an animal.
[close]

Spoiler
The pterosaurs attacking people was like watching a bunch of seagulls at the seaside picking up breadcrumbs. It was a monster movie moment for sure and a damn good one. Reminded me personally of this...

(https://typicalbl0gger.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/giphy.gif)

Maybe the fact these flying animals were not meant to be caged up is why they cease their chance to feast upon freedom.

I can't argue that the Raptors switching loyalty is realistic because it isn't. But for me it works in the world building of the Jurassic series.

And its seems you're projecting a human emotion onto the T-rex and Raptor having a moment of respect when really the Raptor looks at the Rex and takes a step back, making an unaggressive growl, and the T-rex just looks at it and walks off. Nothing un-animalisitc about it in my eyes.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on Jul 08, 2015, 06:14:01 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 06, 2015, 12:03:35 PM
Everyone's happy to see dinosaurs on screen but we still don't respect them enough to portray them properly.
We did 22 years ago.

Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 06, 2015, 12:33:16 PM
Spoiler
The pterosaurs attacking people was like watching a bunch of seagulls at the seaside picking up breadcrumbs.
[close]
Spoiler
Seagulls are fed breadcrumbs by people. They consider it part of their diet.
[close]

Quote
Spoiler
It was a monster movie moment for sure and a damn good one.
[close]
Spoiler
In a series -- and a movie -- that tried to depict them -- or at least wanted to establish them -- as animals, not monsters.
[close]

Quote
Spoiler
Maybe the fact these flying animals were not meant to be caged up is why they cease their chance to feast upon freedom.
[close]
Spoiler
That's really, really silly. Birds don't start eating everything in their path the second they're let out of a cage unless they've been starved.
[close]

Quote
Spoiler
But for me it works in the world building of the Jurassic series.
[close]
Spoiler
Pratt training them, absolutely. Them having switching loyalties -- not to mention "speaking" to an animal that would be about as related to them as a pig is to a human, which the movie made such a huge point about having been entirely isolated its whole life and never learning how to socialise -- however, completely flies in the face of trying to portray dinosaurs as actual animals rather than cool movie monsters.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 08, 2015, 03:11:42 PM
Quote from: SiL on Jul 08, 2015, 06:14:01 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 06, 2015, 12:03:35 PM
Everyone's happy to see dinosaurs on screen but we still don't respect them enough to portray them properly.
We did 22 years ago.

-ish. I've heard of accounts of Stan Winston making the dinosaur creation process an absolute nightmare because he wanted monsters rather than animals.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 08, 2015, 03:55:27 PM
...Source? Winston never pushed for monsterish things and certainly did not make it "a nightmare" to design the dinosaurs. Everything was according to what Spielberg wanted and sometimes Horner would smack 'em in the head too. Hell, Winston Studio was hired because the concepts they presented first were based on the latest scientific theories (for the time).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jul 08, 2015, 03:57:49 PM
Yeah, that doesn't sound like something Winston would do.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jul 08, 2015, 07:41:12 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 06, 2015, 01:06:03 AM
Well considering brain case scans of larger theropods don't outsize the largest birds, none of which have ever been witnessed opening a kitchen door, it's safe to say they weren't brainy. That doesn't mean they were stupid, but just smart for what they needed to do: catch and eat their prey.

Vertigo, you'll like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fo0CVHwmhqo

I really enjoyed this movie. However, why did they hire paleontologists? what's the point anyway? They obviously don't want to make scientifically accurate dinosaurs.

This reminds me of when Giger was hired to work on Prometheus, and yet almost none of his ideas were used. It was almost like a marketing ploy and nothing more.  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 08, 2015, 09:29:49 PM
Quote from: Omegamorph on Jul 08, 2015, 03:55:27 PM
...Source? Winston never pushed for monsterish things and certainly did not make it "a nightmare" to design the dinosaurs. Everything was according to what Spielberg wanted and sometimes Horner would smack 'em in the head too. Hell, Winston Studio was hired because the concepts they presented first were based on the latest scientific theories (for the time).

Like I said, I heard. I have no official confirmation. The dinosaurs in the first film were semi-accurate, but they were still off.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on Jul 09, 2015, 06:36:34 AM
Winston didn't want monsters. He didn't make monsters: he made characters.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 09, 2015, 11:13:59 PM
So, on another viewing last night, I noticed a minor "reference" to the first film. When the mosasaur breaches and snags the shark, the sound effect heard when the cord breaks is the exact same sound effect heard when the cord holding up the sauropod cast in the first film breaks, right before Lex falls. Yes, I noticed that :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Samayel on Jul 10, 2015, 01:04:36 PM
Jurrasic World is brilliant fun. Sure, there are not many suprises, and I occasionally got a sense of deja vu, but is still the best entry in the franchise since the Spielberg masterpiece.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 10, 2015, 03:10:09 PM
An informed source has told me that Hasbro is losing money on the toys. The main line is doing well, but all the smaller lines like Brawlasaurs aren't selling well. I hope they lose enough and consider remaking them.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 11, 2015, 10:16:45 AM
Buy as many of the smaller lines as possible, we know the value will skyrocket soon... Also, I thought the sauropad sound was what I heard (in a previously mentioned post).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 11, 2015, 01:33:23 PM
Some fun reads about Jurassic Park and Jurassic World I found yesterday. These were published before the film's release, but still worth reading I think.

http://www.collegehumor.com/post/7017485/10-things-that-still-bother-me-about-jurassic-park
http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Reason-Jurassic-Park-Main-Stars-Didn-t-Return-Jurassic-World-71908.html
http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Disgusting-Jurassic-World-Scene-Got-Cut-71971.html
http://screenrant.com/jurassic-world-hybrid-dinosaur-explained-spoilers/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: jacc.90 on Jul 11, 2015, 04:21:08 PM
HEY, I did not know this!   :D

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Foi57.tinypic.com%2Fb847ib.jpg&hash=47f014d4e0970c08d5cedf1708629deb3e7a6142)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DaddyYautja on Jul 11, 2015, 06:24:42 PM
Everyone is complaining about the dinosaurs here meanwhile im sitting there like, "How the hell did they start a Jeep that was left there to rot for 20 years?"

That was the most unrealistic thing in the whole movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jul 11, 2015, 06:34:53 PM
Quote from: DaddyYautja on Jul 11, 2015, 06:24:42 PM
Everyone is complaining about the dinosaurs here meanwhile im sitting there like, "How the hell did they start a Jeep that was left there to rot for 20 years?"

That was the most unrealistic thing in the whole movie.

The main characters should always find a way. Don't know if this example fits perfectly with that, but the view point is similar:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_Evil_Marksmanship (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_Evil_Marksmanship)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 11, 2015, 07:46:43 PM
Quote from: DaddyYautja on Jul 11, 2015, 06:24:42 PM
Everyone is complaining about the dinosaurs here meanwhile im sitting there like, "How the hell did they start a Jeep that was left there to rot for 20 years?"

That was the most unrealistic thing in the whole movie.

It's not uncommon to see that sort of thing in a film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 12, 2015, 08:15:19 PM
Just chatted with John Schwartzman about JW. Very addictive personality and what a career!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jul 12, 2015, 09:21:29 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXGCyjJh48I
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Jul 12, 2015, 11:35:31 PM
Quote from: DaddyYautja on Jul 11, 2015, 06:24:42 PM
Everyone is complaining about the dinosaurs here meanwhile im sitting there like, "How the hell did they start a Jeep that was left there to rot for 20 years?"

That was the most unrealistic thing in the whole movie.
they used the fuel and batteries from the nearby ruined car the one where the found near the vistor center with the bloody helmet. how do people keep missing this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jul 13, 2015, 12:35:42 AM
Quote from: DaddyYautja on Jul 11, 2015, 06:24:42 PM
Everyone is complaining about the dinosaurs here meanwhile im sitting there like, "How the hell did they start a Jeep that was left there to rot for 20 years?"

That was the most unrealistic thing in the whole movie.
Dude, Hammond did say "we spared no expense". 20 year warranty on everything inside the park... well that's not computer ran.  Imagine if Spielberg had put that line into Jurassic park. BOOM! :laugh:

To be a nit picker the current atmosphere isn't oxygen rich enough to support any of these creatures especially in a tropical region.


Quote from: szkoki on Jul 12, 2015, 09:21:29 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXGCyjJh48I
Not there best work.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rankles75 on Jul 13, 2015, 01:32:10 AM
Quote from: szkoki on Jul 12, 2015, 09:21:29 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXGCyjJh48I

That's the only one I've seen that didn't make me laugh....
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: razeak on Jul 13, 2015, 02:29:09 AM
The gyosphere made me giggle. Otherwise it was pretty uninspired.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jul 13, 2015, 04:00:17 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jul 13, 2015, 12:35:42 AMTo be a nit picker the current atmosphere isn't oxygen rich enough to support any of these creatures especially in a tropical region.

Probably not true. There are conflicting models for Mesozoic atmospheric components at the moment, and it's likely that oxygen was generally lower throughout the dinosaur era than today, starting to approach modern levels by the Cretaceous. Even the study with higher figures has oxygen in massive flux throughout the Triassic and Jurassic, reaching modern levels at various points.

Carbon dioxide is more of a known quantity, and was definitely a lot higher than today through most of the era. That shouldn't pose a prohibitive breathing difficulty though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jul 13, 2015, 07:31:25 AM
Quote from: frenchfries on Jul 12, 2015, 11:35:31 PMthey used the fuel and batteries from the nearby ruined car the one where the found near the vistor center with the bloody helmet. how do people keep missing this.

The jeep had been sat there for 20 years. The entire engine would have seized up.

You leave a car sitting unused for that long, you have to strip and rebuild the entire engine to get it to work. It's not as simple as putting a new battery and some petrol in it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jul 13, 2015, 11:19:04 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 13, 2015, 04:00:17 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jul 13, 2015, 12:35:42 AMTo be a nit picker the current atmosphere isn't oxygen rich enough to support any of these creatures especially in a tropical region.

Probably not true. There are conflicting models for Mesozoic atmospheric components at the moment, and it's likely that oxygen was generally lower throughout the dinosaur era than today, starting to approach modern levels by the Cretaceous. Even the study with higher figures has oxygen in massive flux throughout the Triassic and Jurassic, reaching modern levels at various points.

Carbon dioxide is more of a known quantity, and was definitely a lot higher than today through most of the era. That shouldn't pose a prohibitive breathing difficulty though.
Not at the size they are displayed at. Velociraptors would be viable but not anything as big as a t-rex.

Quote from: HuDaFuK on Jul 13, 2015, 07:31:25 AM
Quote from: frenchfries on Jul 12, 2015, 11:35:31 PMthey used the fuel and batteries from the nearby ruined car the one where the found near the vistor center with the bloody helmet. how do people keep missing this.

The jeep had been sat there for 20 years. The entire engine would have seized up.

You leave a car sitting unused for that long, you have to strip and rebuild the entire engine to get it to work. It's not as simple as putting a new battery and some petrol in it.
Dude I witnessed an 91 F-150 that was sitting under a tarp since 97 start right up after adding a battery, gas and oil back in 2011. Even with the hole in the gas tank. lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 13, 2015, 12:59:49 PM
Concerning the oxygen thing. Just chalk it off to genetic tampering. They're not real dinosaurs as Wu says.

How disappointing would the movie have been if they found the jeep and tried to start it up only to have it fail. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jul 13, 2015, 01:05:36 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jul 13, 2015, 11:19:04 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 13, 2015, 04:00:17 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jul 13, 2015, 12:35:42 AMTo be a nit picker the current atmosphere isn't oxygen rich enough to support any of these creatures especially in a tropical region.

Probably not true. There are conflicting models for Mesozoic atmospheric components at the moment, and it's likely that oxygen was generally lower throughout the dinosaur era than today, starting to approach modern levels by the Cretaceous. Even the study with higher figures has oxygen in massive flux throughout the Triassic and Jurassic, reaching modern levels at various points.

Carbon dioxide is more of a known quantity, and was definitely a lot higher than today through most of the era. That shouldn't pose a prohibitive breathing difficulty though.
Not at the size they are displayed at. Velociraptors would be viable but not anything as big as a t-rex.

Again - it's no longer widely accepted that Mesozoic oxygen was any higher than today's, and the assertion that dinosaur size was tied to atmospheric oxygen levels is extremely dubious (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3045712/figure/fig08/). Multi-tonne predators Allosaurus and Torvosaurus both existed during the oxygen drop near the end of the Jurassic.

It's insects that seem to have maximum size tied to atmospheric oxygen density, because their respiration system doesn't scale up with the size of the insect. Vertebrates don't have that problem.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jul 13, 2015, 01:11:11 PM
and its not nice to make fun of a bad movie aswell
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 13, 2015, 09:55:43 PM
Quote from: szkoki on Jul 12, 2015, 09:21:29 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXGCyjJh48I

I find it hard to argue with this one. But the heels...everybody is so hung up on that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: TJ Doc on Jul 13, 2015, 10:14:17 PM
Even Michael Dudikoff broke off Judie Aronson's high heels in American Ninja.

You know, so they could more easily escape the evil ninjas.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jul 13, 2015, 11:46:24 PM
High heels is better than no shoes at all.

Still how can a 40 foot long predator chase down pray at current oxygen levels? That's extremely unlikely. There needs to be a fuel source (increased atmospheric oxygen) and genetics engineering alone shouldn't affect that. Also where you are affects the amount of available oxygen which is is why all the largest dinosaurs are found in South America vs else where. Atmospheres thicken up closer to the poles if I recall correctly and SA used to be much more south than it is now where as most other continents were equilateral.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: razeak on Jul 14, 2015, 12:23:24 AM
I spent 5 years as a mechanic and have worked on cars my whole life. The scene with the jeep is absolutely not far fetched. The engine is pretty much sealed when its not running, well mostly. It may not run in top form, but ive gotten cars running again in fairly short order that sat for years.


It also just so happens I have some experience with k-9 units and I find the idea of bigger, stronger, faster and more lethal raptors as a brother in arms attractive if something like that was alive today and tameable.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PRI. HUDSON on Jul 14, 2015, 12:30:07 AM
It is a movie...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: razeak on Jul 14, 2015, 12:32:53 AM
Which is why I posted my experience. I dont get the hate for the raptor/military angle or the jeep scene.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PRI. HUDSON on Jul 14, 2015, 12:45:16 AM
I know movies border into the RIDICULOUS sometimes, even when they try to pass it off as real or possible. To me, Jurassic World is sci-fi, so anything goes. I don't care if a 20 year old jeep started, or what the dinosaurs are SUPPOSED to look like, etc.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jul 14, 2015, 01:16:25 AM
Summer movies are always ridiculous, they wouldn't be any fun if they had to adhere to the laws of physics or reasoning.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 14, 2015, 01:59:36 AM
Especially if it's The Avengers. The film wouldn't make it out of the first act.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DaddyYautja on Jul 14, 2015, 08:22:58 AM
Quote from: razeak on Jul 14, 2015, 12:32:53 AM
Which is why I posted my experience. I dont get the hate for the raptor/military angle or the jeep scene.

I dont hate the scene i just found it funny that a teenager and a kid got a car running that was exposed to the elements.
The little garage it was in was open, right? It's not like it in relatively clean area.
Im not saying it killed the movie but i found it funny.
It was a weird needless scene, to me. I found it weird that they left the old JP with everything in it, no one took anything. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jul 14, 2015, 11:47:23 AM
The movie itself actually made references to them getting that jeep to work several times and it was funny.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 14, 2015, 03:35:00 PM
I'd like to see more colour variety in the dinosaurs in the sequel. All the grey herbivores were bleh.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Jul 14, 2015, 06:38:55 PM
Ye
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 14, 2015, 03:35:00 PM
I'd like to see more colour variety in the dinosaurs in the sequel. All the grey herbivores were bleh.
Yes please.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jul 14, 2015, 09:58:07 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jul 13, 2015, 11:46:24 PM
Still how can a 40 foot long predator chase down prey at current oxygen levels? That's extremely unlikely. There needs to be a fuel source (increased atmospheric oxygen) and genetics engineering alone shouldn't affect that. Also where you are affects the amount of available oxygen which is is why all the largest dinosaurs are found in South America vs else where. Atmospheres thicken up closer to the poles if I recall correctly and SA used to be much more south than it is now where as most other continents were equilateral.

Giant sauropods have been found on every continent, throughout most of the Mesozoic. Multi-tonne dinosaurs - both predators and prey - were found in deserts, tundra, savannah, swamps, forests and jungles alike. Albertosaurus and Edmontosaurus migrated as far north as Alaska and as far south as New Mexico. There is no good evidence that dinosaurs were limited by oxygen content, whether locally or globally (and, as I've said before, it's no longer accepted that Mesozoic oxygen was higher than today's).

Their abilities aren't particularly surprising, either.
Advanced ornithischians had a breathing system similar to mammals', with air forced out by a muscular thoracic diaphragm - most of them were lighter than the largest living elephants, which manage to spend hours foraging, travelling and occasionally trotting or fighting, while wielding complex brains and dealing with extremes of temperature. So why wouldn't a similar-sized ornithopod manage?
Sauropods and theropods had a much better breathing system than ours, similar to birds'. Air sacs in their skeletons allow them to process far more oxygen per breath, maintaining a one-directional flow of air through the lungs and ensuring that they're absorbing oxygen-rich air even while exhaling. It's this system which allows birds to fly at great heights for hours, in conditions where humans need breathing apparatus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 15, 2015, 12:07:38 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 14, 2015, 09:58:07 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jul 13, 2015, 11:46:24 PM
Still how can a 40 foot long predator chase down prey at current oxygen levels? That's extremely unlikely. There needs to be a fuel source (increased atmospheric oxygen) and genetics engineering alone shouldn't affect that. Also where you are affects the amount of available oxygen which is is why all the largest dinosaurs are found in South America vs else where. Atmospheres thicken up closer to the poles if I recall correctly and SA used to be much more south than it is now where as most other continents were equilateral.

Giant sauropods have been found on every continent, throughout most of the Mesozoic. Multi-tonne dinosaurs - both predators and prey - were found in deserts, tundra, savannah, swamps, forests and jungles alike. Albertosaurus and Edmontosaurus migrated as far north as Alaska and as far south as New Mexico. There is no good evidence that dinosaurs were limited by oxygen content, whether locally or globally (and, as I've said before, it's no longer accepted that Mesozoic oxygen was higher than today's).

Their abilities aren't particularly surprising, either.
Advanced ornithischians had a breathing system similar to mammals', with air forced out by a muscular thoracic diaphragm - most of them were lighter than the largest living elephants, which manage to spend hours foraging, travelling and occasionally trotting or fighting, while wielding complex brains and dealing with extremes of temperature. So why wouldn't a similar-sized ornithopod manage?
Sauropods and theropods had a much better breathing system than ours, similar to birds'. Air sacs in their skeletons allow them to process far more oxygen per breath, maintaining a one-directional flow of air through the lungs and ensuring that they're absorbing oxygen-rich air even while exhaling. It's this system which allows birds to fly at great heights for hours, in conditions where humans need breathing apparatus.

"We all know [the kaiju] have two brains, like a dinosaur!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jul 15, 2015, 03:14:01 AM
 In the comic Jurassic Park: Redemption II, how did they where able to create a  Dimetrodon  if they exist before the Dinosaurs and how they can get DNA for a animal that exited from 300 - 252 million years ago?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 15, 2015, 08:57:07 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8g4Q4niXXKQ
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DaddyYautja on Jul 15, 2015, 09:33:32 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 14, 2015, 03:35:00 PM
I'd like to see more colour variety in the dinosaurs in the sequel. All the grey herbivores were bleh.

Yeah, it was like some one tripped and bump the comp while it was rendering and all saturation was lost.

Everything was pretty much almost grey on some level. Even the raptors were pretty much grey except for the few lines.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 16, 2015, 12:21:15 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Jul 15, 2015, 03:14:01 AM
In the comic Jurassic Park: Redemption II, how did they where able to create a  Dimetrodon  if they exist before the Dinosaurs and how they can get DNA for a animal that exited from 300 - 252 million years ago?

Same way they got the DNA from dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Jul 16, 2015, 05:29:51 PM
Quote from: DaddyYautja on Jul 15, 2015, 09:33:32 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 14, 2015, 03:35:00 PM
I'd like to see more colour variety in the dinosaurs in the sequel. All the grey herbivores were bleh.

Yeah, it was like some one tripped and bump the comp while it was rendering and all saturation was lost.

Everything was pretty much almost grey on some level. Even the raptors were pretty much grey except for the few lines.

That's mostly consistent with the old movies though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 16, 2015, 05:30:51 PM
Quote from: MrSpaceJockey on Jul 16, 2015, 05:29:51 PM
Quote from: DaddyYautja on Jul 15, 2015, 09:33:32 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 14, 2015, 03:35:00 PM
I'd like to see more colour variety in the dinosaurs in the sequel. All the grey herbivores were bleh.

Yeah, it was like some one tripped and bump the comp while it was rendering and all saturation was lost.

Everything was pretty much almost grey on some level. Even the raptors were pretty much grey except for the few lines.

That's mostly consistent with the old movies though.

Oh come on. Adding a dash of colour isn't going to affect the dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jul 16, 2015, 05:46:52 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 16, 2015, 12:21:15 PM
Same way they got the DNA from dinosaurs.

Dimetrodon's are way older then Dinosaurs. The oldest known mosquito fossil record is from 150 million years ago. Dimetrodon's died out 50 million years before Dinosaurs exist. It would be impossible for a mosquito to get blood from an animal that didn't exist during the Dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Jul 16, 2015, 06:16:56 PM
Maybe there's some other blood sucking invertebrate who could've gotten stuck in amber.  All you really need is to stretch your imagination a bit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DaddyYautja on Jul 17, 2015, 08:34:02 AM
Quote from: MrSpaceJockey on Jul 16, 2015, 05:29:51 PM
Quote from: DaddyYautja on Jul 15, 2015, 09:33:32 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 14, 2015, 03:35:00 PM
I'd like to see more colour variety in the dinosaurs in the sequel. All the grey herbivores were bleh.

Yeah, it was like some one tripped and bump the comp while it was rendering and all saturation was lost.

Everything was pretty much almost grey on some level. Even the raptors were pretty much grey except for the few lines.

That's mostly consistent with the old movies though.

Which?
Cause in JP they was more color.
The Dilophosaurus was green, Gallimimus were orang (http://www.gamersyde.com/news_jurassic_park_the_dinosaurs-10814.jpg)e, the raptors were brown, the triceratops was a rust color, the was some good variations.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Jul 17, 2015, 06:26:08 PM
Most looked brown or gray.  Save for the frill, Dilophosaurus looked gray.  Tyrannosaurus, Triceratops, Velociraptor, Brachiosaurus - all gray or brown, depending on the lighting.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DaddyYautja on Jul 17, 2015, 06:51:15 PM
Quote from: MrSpaceJockey on Jul 17, 2015, 06:26:08 PM
Most looked brown or gray.  Save for the frill, Dilophosaurus looked gray.  Tyrannosaurus, Triceratops, Velociraptor, Brachiosaurus - all gray or brown, depending on the lighting.

Yeah the night shots sapped the color but with light you could clearly see colors.
The Dilophosaurus is clearly green  (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d921M-ACMM4)when light hits it straight.

In JW during the day shots every looks the same as in the night shots. Which wasnt the same in JP.

Gallis (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nM-RPO10aPY&index=6&list=PL6D34B9C445F81351)
Triceratops (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JylK4HuKMvQ&index=3&list=PL6D34B9C445F81351)

And if the dress is white or purple..... Brown and grey is still better than just grey.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jul 19, 2015, 03:00:15 PM
also
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTChJruqJTc



btw

https://youtu.be/f4W5DUKMBIQ?t=292
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 19, 2015, 04:49:13 PM
Quote from: szkoki on Jul 19, 2015, 03:00:15 PM
also
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTChJruqJTc

This video has already been posted a few pages back.

Considering they had to mess with the CGI in the video thumbnail already undoes their argument that the CG in JW is lacklustre.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 19, 2015, 05:06:44 PM
Yeah, they messed with it as a means to grab your attention. It's not relevant to the argument.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 19, 2015, 06:11:01 PM
It's completely relevant to the argument. It's a video about how "bad" the CGI is in JW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: szkoki on Jul 19, 2015, 08:18:42 PM
not bad, just not realistic, not realistic at all nowdays in any movies....well maybe Blomkamp uses more realistic color palette
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 19, 2015, 09:09:55 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 19, 2015, 06:11:01 PM
It's completely relevant to the argument. It's a video about how "bad" the CGI is in JW.

When you can clearly tell it's a CG effect that you're looking at, yes, that means it's bad.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 19, 2015, 09:10:47 PM
I dunno, even when practical effects are well done, I can still tell that they're models or whatever. Does that make them "bad"?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 19, 2015, 09:30:33 PM
You're supposed to be able to tell it's real though. With CG, it shouldn't "look like" it's made with a computer. If there's no weight to it, it will look fake.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on Jul 19, 2015, 10:38:26 PM
The argument in the video is that the effects aren't convincing. There's a difference. The CGI is technically well achieved, it just never feels like anything other than CGI.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Darkness on Jul 23, 2015, 06:57:07 PM
Jurassic World sequel confirmed for June 22, 2018.  The film will be written by Jurassic World's director, Colin Trevorrow, and Derek Connolly. Spielberg will be joined by Trevorrow as executive producer on the film.

http://www.comingsoon.net/movies/news/464729-jurassic-world-sequel-dated-for-june-22-2018-chris-pratt-bryce-dallas-howard-returning
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DaddyYautja on Jul 23, 2015, 07:20:06 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 19, 2015, 09:09:55 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 19, 2015, 06:11:01 PM
It's completely relevant to the argument. It's a video about how "bad" the CGI is in JW.

When you can clearly tell it's a CG effect that you're looking at, yes, that means it's bad.

The problem with CGI is that it lets you create whatever setup you want. So when seeing CGI in film you can easily spot it because that shot would not be possible without CGI. People using CGI need to be a little conservative on how they shoot think of it as if they are shooting actual sets. Dial stuff back a bit.

Quote from: Darkness on Jul 23, 2015, 06:57:07 PM
Jurassic World sequel confirmed for June 22, 2018.  The film will be written by Jurassic World's director, Colin Trevorrow, and Derek Connolly. Spielberg will be joined by Trevorrow as executive producer on the film.

http://www.comingsoon.net/movies/news/464729-jurassic-world-sequel-dated-for-june-22-2018-chris-pratt-bryce-dallas-howard-returning

Can we have some story this next time?
Cause the story of the JW was pretty much.... and a dinosaur escapes.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 23, 2015, 07:49:08 PM
Quote from: Darkness on Jul 23, 2015, 06:57:07 PM
Jurassic World sequel confirmed for June 22, 2018.  The film will be written by Jurassic World's director, Colin Trevorrow, and Derek Connolly. Spielberg will be joined by Trevorrow as executive producer on the film.

http://www.comingsoon.net/movies/news/464729-jurassic-world-sequel-dated-for-june-22-2018-chris-pratt-bryce-dallas-howard-returning

I want two things: better use of CG and animatronics and scientifically accurate dinosaurs. f**k the haters.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: T Dog on Jul 23, 2015, 08:34:57 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 23, 2015, 07:49:08 PM
Quote from: Darkness on Jul 23, 2015, 06:57:07 PM
Jurassic World sequel confirmed for June 22, 2018.  The film will be written by Jurassic World's director, Colin Trevorrow, and Derek Connolly. Spielberg will be joined by Trevorrow as executive producer on the film.

http://www.comingsoon.net/movies/news/464729-jurassic-world-sequel-dated-for-june-22-2018-chris-pratt-bryce-dallas-howard-returning

I want two things: better use of CG and animatronics and scientifically accurate dinosaurs. f**k the haters.

Yeah the CG was really terrible in JW.

I want them to go the Cadillacs and Dinosaurs route with the next movie.
Just think - MAd MAx with dinosaurs = awesome!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 23, 2015, 08:40:35 PM
I'd watch it, but not as part of the Jurassic Park series. It wouldn't fit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DaddyYautja on Jul 23, 2015, 10:24:58 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 23, 2015, 07:49:08 PM
Quote from: Darkness on Jul 23, 2015, 06:57:07 PM
Jurassic World sequel confirmed for June 22, 2018.  The film will be written by Jurassic World's director, Colin Trevorrow, and Derek Connolly. Spielberg will be joined by Trevorrow as executive producer on the film.

http://www.comingsoon.net/movies/news/464729-jurassic-world-sequel-dated-for-june-22-2018-chris-pratt-bryce-dallas-howard-returning

I want two things: better use of CG and animatronics and scientifically accurate dinosaurs. f**k the haters.

What do you mean accurate?
You want tiny raptors and feathers all over the place?
Feathers will be too much cause of all the time spent of animating the feathers moving properly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 23, 2015, 10:28:13 PM
Quote from: DaddyYautja on Jul 23, 2015, 10:24:58 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 23, 2015, 07:49:08 PM
Quote from: Darkness on Jul 23, 2015, 06:57:07 PM
Jurassic World sequel confirmed for June 22, 2018.  The film will be written by Jurassic World's director, Colin Trevorrow, and Derek Connolly. Spielberg will be joined by Trevorrow as executive producer on the film.

http://www.comingsoon.net/movies/news/464729-jurassic-world-sequel-dated-for-june-22-2018-chris-pratt-bryce-dallas-howard-returning

I want two things: better use of CG and animatronics and scientifically accurate dinosaurs. f**k the haters.

What do you mean accurate?
You want tiny raptors and feathers all over the place?
Feathers will be too much cause of all the time spent of animating the feathers moving properly.

We can have big raptors (Utahraptor) with feathers. The cost of rendering wouldn't be that high. It all depends on how they're rendered.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: T Dog on Jul 23, 2015, 10:39:16 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 23, 2015, 08:40:35 PM
I'd watch it, but not as part of the Jurassic Park series. It wouldn't fit.

Well the series has to evolve into something. They can't just keep shooting them in Hawaii.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Keg on Jul 23, 2015, 10:52:57 PM
I really want to see something different this time though. Please dont go back to the islands. We've had two films in a theme park gone tits up and two films on an island where all the dinosaurs are loose. Hopefully they'll use the Henry Wu subplot taking the embryos off the island as a stepping stone to set something new up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jul 23, 2015, 11:01:31 PM
Well, they've set up that the park will be history by the following morning, and that the genetic experiments have been smuggled out. So I'd be surprised if they set another film on those islands, and I think I heard Colin Trevorrow mention on a podcast that he envisioned future stories taking place "on the mainland". Which mainland I'm not sure - given that the production has absolutely 0 connections to Costa Rica, and Michael Crichton's completely out of the picture now (whether directly or through legacy), there's no reason to think it'd be the nearest coast.

The most obvious angle to take would be a continuation of the military stuff, but the Hoskins character wasn't particularly well-received, so who knows.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Jul 26, 2015, 07:55:30 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 23, 2015, 11:01:31 PM
Well, they've set up that the park will be history by the following morning, and that the genetic experiments have been smuggled out. So I'd be surprised if they set another film on those islands, and I think I heard Colin Trevorrow mention on a podcast that he envisioned future stories taking place "on the mainland". Which mainland I'm not sure - given that the production has absolutely 0 connections to Costa Rica, and Michael Crichton's completely out of the picture now (whether directly or through legacy), there's no reason to think it'd be the nearest coast.

The most obvious angle to take would be a continuation of the military stuff, but the Hoskins character wasn't particularly well-received, so who knows.

Yeah I was pretty sure "Jurassic World" was a pun for an actual "Jurassic" world now being implemented into the world with dinosaurs repopulating various parts of the world. I thought the movie would end on that but since they're planning a trilogy then yeah the ending made sense. I think it will happen by the end of the next one. I just hope they don't exaggerate it and it h ets to the point were human civilization falls because that's ridiculous, but just certain areas in the world are affected by dinosaur populations making parts of the world extra dangerous.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DaddyYautja on Jul 26, 2015, 09:01:48 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 23, 2015, 10:28:13 PM
Quote from: DaddyYautja on Jul 23, 2015, 10:24:58 PM

What do you mean accurate?
You want tiny raptors and feathers all over the place?
Feathers will be too much cause of all the time spent of animating the feathers moving properly.

We can have big raptors (Utahraptor) with feathers. The cost of rendering wouldn't be that high. It all depends on how they're rendered.

Utahs are bigger than the current raptor size use on screen.
And with feather they would need to add some color which these people dont like doing, for some reason.
Did you like the proto feathers of JP3?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Jul 27, 2015, 02:37:58 AM
Quote from: xeno-kaname on Jul 26, 2015, 07:55:30 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 23, 2015, 11:01:31 PM
Well, they've set up that the park will be history by the following morning, and that the genetic experiments have been smuggled out. So I'd be surprised if they set another film on those islands, and I think I heard Colin Trevorrow mention on a podcast that he envisioned future stories taking place "on the mainland". Which mainland I'm not sure - given that the production has absolutely 0 connections to Costa Rica, and Michael Crichton's completely out of the picture now (whether directly or through legacy), there's no reason to think it'd be the nearest coast.

The most obvious angle to take would be a continuation of the military stuff, but the Hoskins character wasn't particularly well-received, so who knows.

Yeah I was pretty sure "Jurassic World" was a pun for an actual "Jurassic" world now being implemented into the world with dinosaurs repopulating various parts of the world. I thought the movie would end on that but since they're planning a trilogy then yeah the ending made sense. I think it will happen by the end of the next one. I just hope they don't exaggerate it and it h ets to the point were human civilization falls because that's ridiculous, but just certain areas in the world are affected by dinosaur populations making parts of the world extra dangerous.
They're clearly setting up a jurassic world / planet of the apes crossover.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PRI. HUDSON on Jul 27, 2015, 02:41:37 AM
I didn't think the CGI was bad at all...not sure what you saw. I agree about more animatronics. Definitely could have used that MUCH more.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Twin Drive Sigma Aquarion on Jul 27, 2015, 04:21:40 AM
Please don't have something like Mosasaurus suddenly eating I-Rex next movie, that is all- Wait a second, I just noticed part 5 will be released the same year as the Godzilla sequel. :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Born Of Cold Light on Jul 27, 2015, 06:49:22 AM
The original script had human/dino hybrids.  I wonder if we'll see that in the future.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 27, 2015, 11:17:17 AM
Quote from: DaddyYautja on Jul 26, 2015, 09:01:48 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 23, 2015, 10:28:13 PM
Quote from: DaddyYautja on Jul 23, 2015, 10:24:58 PM

What do you mean accurate?
You want tiny raptors and feathers all over the place?
Feathers will be too much cause of all the time spent of animating the feathers moving properly.

We can have big raptors (Utahraptor) with feathers. The cost of rendering wouldn't be that high. It all depends on how they're rendered.

Utahs are bigger than the current raptor size use on screen.
And with feather they would need to add some color which these people dont like doing, for some reason.
Did you like the proto feathers of JP3?

Not necessarily. Most Utahraptor specimens aren't larger than the average man at six feet in height. Yeah, people don't like to see colourful dinosaurs. They probably think that means it's going to look like it walked out of a PRIDE parade. As for JP3, indeed I did. It was great to see a new take on the raptors.

Quote from: Born Of Cold Light on Jul 27, 2015, 06:49:22 AM
The original script had human/dino hybrids.  I wonder if we'll see that in the future.

I hate to say it but given the whole militarization of the dinosaurs thing from JW, it's more likely than not.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Jul 27, 2015, 08:09:58 PM
Both Jurassic Park 5 and Godzilla 2 in 2018?!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 27, 2015, 10:11:29 PM
If they announce the Prometheus sequel for 2018 it'll be a dream come true for me!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Born Of Cold Light on Jul 27, 2015, 10:26:55 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 27, 2015, 11:17:17 AM
Quote from: DaddyYautja on Jul 26, 2015, 09:01:48 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 23, 2015, 10:28:13 PM
Quote from: DaddyYautja on Jul 23, 2015, 10:24:58 PM

What do you mean accurate?
You want tiny raptors and feathers all over the place?
Feathers will be too much cause of all the time spent of animating the feathers moving properly.

We can have big raptors (Utahraptor) with feathers. The cost of rendering wouldn't be that high. It all depends on how they're rendered.

Utahs are bigger than the current raptor size use on screen.
And with feather they would need to add some color which these people dont like doing, for some reason.
Did you like the proto feathers of JP3?

Not necessarily. Most Utahraptor specimens aren't larger than the average man at six feet in height. Yeah, people don't like to see colourful dinosaurs. They probably think that means it's going to look like it walked out of a PRIDE parade. As for JP3, indeed I did. It was great to see a new take on the raptors.

Quote from: Born Of Cold Light on Jul 27, 2015, 06:49:22 AM
The original script had human/dino hybrids.  I wonder if we'll see that in the future.

I hate to say it but given the whole militarization of the dinosaurs thing from JW, it's more likely than not.

A styracosarus running around in military fatigues with an assault rifle could look pretty cool.

But seriously, I am seriously wondering where they are gonna go from here.  The park concept has by now been driven into the ground.  There could be a Godzilla-style film with an indominus or some other species rampaging in a major city, though it would probably be gunned down quickly in real life.

If it were up to me, I would create a spin-off series dealing with all sorts of blasphemous hybrid monsters.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 27, 2015, 10:37:53 PM
I doubt they'll move away from the island setting. Dinosaurs always look best in the jungle.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naissus on Jul 28, 2015, 12:30:34 AM
What about an underground bunker?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 28, 2015, 12:38:59 AM
In a shocking twist, JP5 will be a crossover with Dino Crisis.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naissus on Jul 28, 2015, 12:43:03 AM
I would like that.  Maybe just a stand alone.  I hear Shinji Mikami would like to return to Dino Crisis.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 28, 2015, 01:28:06 AM
Quote from: Naissus on Jul 28, 2015, 12:30:34 AM
What about an underground bunker?

It would have to be a rather massive bunker.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Alien Predator on Jul 28, 2015, 01:52:41 AM
How about Predators hunting dinosaurs in the Park with Godzilla paying a visit?

Ok, I'll help myself out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Jul 28, 2015, 08:15:28 AM
Quote from: Guan Thwei 1992 on Jul 28, 2015, 01:52:41 AM
How about Predators hunting dinosaurs in the Park with Godzilla paying a visit?

Ok, I'll help myself out.

Only if batman turns up complete with kaiju repellant spray.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Alien Predator on Jul 28, 2015, 06:38:51 PM
Quote from: bloodinthemud on Jul 28, 2015, 08:15:28 AM
Quote from: Guan Thwei 1992 on Jul 28, 2015, 01:52:41 AM
How about Predators hunting dinosaurs in the Park with Godzilla paying a visit?

Ok, I'll help myself out.

Only if batman turns up complete with kaiju repellant spray.

Don't forget to bring Poison Ivy along, we need her to control the new Biollante who will be made from Godzilla's, Indominus', a Japanese scientist's daughter's, a rose's and the Mosasaur's DNA.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 28, 2015, 06:46:11 PM
My review of Hasbro's electronic Indominus Rex was posted over at Darkness' JW site. Have a look! It's a great site.

http://www.jurassicworlduniverse.com/2015/07/25/review-electronic-indominus-rex-by-hasbro/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Jul 29, 2015, 02:45:17 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 23, 2015, 11:01:31 PMThe most obvious angle to take would be a continuation of the military stuff, but the Hoskins character wasn't particularly well-received, so who knows.

Spoiler
Do we know for sure he's dead?
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jul 29, 2015, 04:42:36 AM
Quote from: Gilfryd on Jul 29, 2015, 02:45:17 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 23, 2015, 11:01:31 PMThe most obvious angle to take would be a continuation of the military stuff, but the Hoskins character wasn't particularly well-received, so who knows.

Spoiler
Do we know for sure he's dead?
[close]
Dude, if he survived that then he must have been a T-800, model 155 or something. Of course I kid, cause they could bring him back via the all magical D-N-A way the rest of the dinos are brought back to life. Maybe Hoskins will figure out the obvious and come back as half raptor. :P

or were you talking about the Idominis Rex? Cause I'm not certain he's dead. :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 29, 2015, 12:09:47 PM
Quote from: Gilfryd on Jul 29, 2015, 02:45:17 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 23, 2015, 11:01:31 PMThe most obvious angle to take would be a continuation of the military stuff, but the Hoskins character wasn't particularly well-received, so who knows.

Spoiler
Do we know for sure he's dead?
[close]

This is Jurassic Park, not The Avengers. He's definitely dead.

Quote from: whiterabbit on Jul 29, 2015, 04:42:36 AM
or were you talking about the Idominis Rex? Cause I'm not certain he's dead. :)

No, she's definitely dead as well. She was tough but not invincible.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jul 29, 2015, 02:01:35 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jul 29, 2015, 12:09:47 PM
This is Jurassic Park, not The Avengers. He's definitely dead.

I know it wasn't the films but didn't stop them bringing Malcolm back in the books.  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jul 29, 2015, 02:03:29 PM
Well technically, all we get in the book is Muldoon shaking his head when asked about Malcolm. This is of course after Malcolm just fades out in mid-speech. It could've been a temporary thing, like a coma state.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 29, 2015, 02:07:17 PM
The Lost World's first few chapters address that pretty well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jul 29, 2015, 02:22:36 PM
Page 398 of Jurassic Park:

QuoteThe government of Costa Rica felt they had been misled and deceived by John Hammond and his plans for the island. Under the circumstances, the government was not disposed to release of the survivors in a hurry. They did not even permit the burial of Hammond or Ian Malcolm. They simply waited.

He was dead until Crichton retconned his mathematical ass back from the dead to be in The Lost World (which I'm sure had something to do with the success of the Jurassic Park movie and the popularity of the Ian Malcolm character as portrayed by Jeff Goldblum.)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jul 29, 2015, 02:41:10 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Jul 29, 2015, 02:22:36 PM(which I'm sure had something to do with the success of the Jurassic Park movie and the popularity of the Ian Malcolm character as portrayed by Jeff Goldblum.)

He only wrote the book at all because the first film was so big. Universal specifically asked him to pen a sequel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Jul 29, 2015, 02:42:11 PM
Well. There you go.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 29, 2015, 05:45:26 PM
Haha hell yes. Spielberg tormented him. You can see some bitterness in TLW too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 07, 2015, 02:30:35 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71JhrjTxUgE
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Aug 07, 2015, 05:22:11 AM
I don't think it had anything to do with being unable to make a feathered dinosaur scary... they're just saving it for the inevitable sequel. Where Dr. Wu finally gives everyone real dinosaurs. Of course they basically are way more scary then the fake ones while sporting sheik feather coats.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 07, 2015, 11:49:49 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Aug 07, 2015, 05:22:11 AM
I don't think it had anything to do with being unable to make a feathered dinosaur scary...

Trust me when I say there's more than a few JP fans who honestly believe feathered animals aren't scary.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Aug 07, 2015, 12:25:21 PM
Still with this stuff? Good God. We've been drawing circles in this thread.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 07, 2015, 02:15:15 PM
As long as Jurassic Park exists, this subject will always be around.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vermillion on Aug 07, 2015, 03:34:28 PM
We are hairless apes. 

Or are we hairless aliens?

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Aug 07, 2015, 07:55:17 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Aug 07, 2015, 11:49:49 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Aug 07, 2015, 05:22:11 AM
I don't think it had anything to do with being unable to make a feathered dinosaur scary...

Trust me when I say there's more than a few JP fans who honestly believe feathered animals aren't scary.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwTul9-HGu8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3nMguU6p4E


I want you to get attacked by a f**king Goose and tell me they aren't terrifying.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 07, 2015, 08:34:12 PM
Trust me man, I know. Oh how I know...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 08, 2015, 09:13:44 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Aug 07, 2015, 02:30:35 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71JhrjTxUgE

She completely bypasses the conversation between Wu and Masrani where he says "If their genome was 100% many of them would look very different." It's a piece of entertainment which is commenting more of genetic tampering than anything else.

"Nothing in Jurassic World is natural!" - Henry Wu.

I'm all for seeing a feathered dinosaur on screen in a JP but on a new species.

That shot of Owen holding the raptor in the thumbnail is gorgeous!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Aug 08, 2015, 09:21:19 AM
Who here can honestly say that being hunted down by a 40 foot chicken isn't terrifying?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 08, 2015, 12:37:17 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Aug 08, 2015, 09:13:44 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Aug 07, 2015, 02:30:35 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71JhrjTxUgE

She completely bypasses the conversation between Wu and Masrani where he says "If their genome was 100% many of them would look very different." It's a piece of entertainment which is commenting more of genetic tampering than anything else.

"Nothing in Jurassic World is natural!" - Henry Wu.

I'm all for seeing a feathered dinosaur on screen in a JP but on a new species.

That shot of Owen holding the raptor in the thumbnail is gorgeous!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fo0CVHwmhqo

2:49 I invite you to watch a promo where the film's own promo shuts that genetic tampering argument down.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 08, 2015, 12:54:07 PM
That promo video is meant to be real advert for the company. If you believe everything InGen says then you might as well sit yourself on a toilet in the Rex paddock. :-*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Aug 08, 2015, 01:18:54 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Aug 08, 2015, 12:37:17 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fo0CVHwmhqo

2:49 I invite you to watch a promo where the film's own promo shuts that genetic tampering argument down.

God, Doom, you missed the point by something like two thousand yards.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Aug 09, 2015, 12:43:16 PM
A little off topic, has there been any information on the eventual Blu/DVD releases?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vermillion on Aug 09, 2015, 02:33:10 PM
$43.99
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 09, 2015, 08:59:49 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Aug 08, 2015, 12:54:07 PM
That promo video is meant to be real advert for the company.

Yeah, so what? That doesn't mean that they couldn't have applied the idea to the actual film.

Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Aug 09, 2015, 12:43:16 PM
A little off topic, has there been any information on the eventual Blu/DVD releases?

There's also going to be a Limited Edition version which will come with two models that connect via separate bases: Indominus and T.rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Aug 10, 2015, 06:01:23 PM
I hope you guys are ready to feel the box office record crumble to pieces when Star Wars returns.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 10, 2015, 06:32:14 PM
Well, that's a foregone conclusion :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Aug 10, 2015, 06:38:58 PM
Quote from: Gate on Aug 10, 2015, 06:01:23 PM
I hope you guys are ready to feel the box office record crumble to pieces when Star Wars returns.
Yeah, again, so?

I'm incredibly happy for the box office returns but don't care if they get one-upped; and that's because I'm happy for two reasons -- A. they show that JP is still in people's minds and there's still interest in it and B. we'll get a sequel. Who the hell cares if the records are broken again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 10, 2015, 10:29:40 PM
The sequel definitely won't make as much money as JW. It made as much as it did for two reasons, as I see it: the mother of all hype trains leading up to it along with it being the first JP-related film in 14 years. Given the disappointment with JW, people likely won't be as hyped for the sequel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Aug 10, 2015, 11:03:15 PM
JW's performance went strong for most of its theatrical run. People went to see it more than once. It made one Goddamn billion dollars at the box office. It's not a disappointment.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 10, 2015, 11:06:06 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Aug 10, 2015, 10:29:40 PM
Given the disappointment with JW, people likely won't be as hyped for the sequel.

Whaaaaaaa?

You're kidding right? The film got a very positive reaction pretty much across the board.

Quote from: Gate on Aug 10, 2015, 06:01:23 PM
I hope you guys are ready to feel the box office record crumble to pieces when Star Wars returns.

I personally don't care.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Aug 10, 2015, 11:36:45 PM
Quote from: Omegamorph on Aug 10, 2015, 11:03:15 PM
JW's performance went strong for most of its theatrical run. People went to see it more than once. It made one Goddamn billion dollars at the box office. It's not a disappointment.

It's now the third highest-grossing film of all time, and second in North America if you don't count Titanic's 3D re-release. It had been assumed that Star Wars was a lock to annihilate Jurassic World's overall box office, but at this point, that's no longer certain - JW's a monster. It's also virtually guaranteed to hang on to its opening weekend record for a good long while (Force Awakens' winter launch isn't likely to touch it).

Critical reception wasn't spectacular, and RottenTomatoes' average nerd reviews are in the Avatar region of 81% positivity, but I don't think anyone ever expected it to be a Jurassic Park-level achievement.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 10, 2015, 11:37:19 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Aug 10, 2015, 11:06:06 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Aug 10, 2015, 10:29:40 PM
Given the disappointment with JW, people likely won't be as hyped for the sequel.

Whaaaaaaa?

You're kidding right? The film got a very positive reaction pretty much across the board.

Yeah, the majority of people. But those who were disappointed (of the 100%, I'd say at least 30%) likely won't see the sequel. That's 30% of the revenue gone (potentially).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Aug 10, 2015, 11:47:21 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Aug 10, 2015, 11:37:19 PM
But those who were disappointed (of the 100%, I'd say at least 30%) likely won't see the sequel. That's 30% of the revenue gone (potentially).
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi0.wp.com%2Fwww.sportsalcohol.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F07%2FTaylorLaughing.gif%3Fresize%3D400%252C170&hash=6e040bf6ddfd9fa2301971f3707f6edd93f6e58d)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 10, 2015, 11:51:55 PM
Quote from: Omegamorph on Aug 10, 2015, 11:47:21 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Aug 10, 2015, 11:37:19 PM
But those who were disappointed (of the 100%, I'd say at least 30%) likely won't see the sequel. That's 30% of the revenue gone (potentially).
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi0.wp.com%2Fwww.sportsalcohol.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F07%2FTaylorLaughing.gif%3Fresize%3D400%252C170&hash=6e040bf6ddfd9fa2301971f3707f6edd93f6e58d)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1082.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fj370%2FJezey%2FBored%2520Eye%2520Roll%2520Shaking%2520Head%2520Gifs%2FJudge-Judy-Shake-My-Head-Gif_zps66b02891.gif&hash=a98857adf8d4657b2beb1294a8dbeb1805d77818)

Don't take my word for it.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi86.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk93%2FDoomRulz_316%2FCapture_zpsnwqvbo6r.png&hash=b297c0d1cee59ef9ea18a8c8c4d60e953f48c6da)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Aug 11, 2015, 12:47:29 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi3.kym-cdn.com%2Fphotos%2Fimages%2Ffacebook%2F000%2F633%2F734%2F173.jpg&hash=7440324e86d0f2433c7161d866adb8c4db599452)

Oh yes, that's obviously indicative of the entire audience who has seen the movie.

On IMDb, less than 10% of the users gave JW less than a 6. On Rotten Tomatoes, the film has an 81% user score.

Not to mention that A. not everyone uses the internet to rate movies and B. many people who "did not like the first one" (?) will see the sequel anyway.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 11, 2015, 02:18:13 AM
If you didn't like the first film, why bother with the sequel? I don't mean you specifically, in more general terms. Also, the IMDB rating is currently at 7.3/10 based on user ratings, so it's in line with the number from Metacritic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: System Apollo on Aug 11, 2015, 02:25:48 AM
I didn't think Jurassic World was all that necessary.    :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Aug 11, 2015, 05:13:54 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Aug 11, 2015, 02:18:13 AM
If you didn't like the first film, why bother with the sequel? I don't mean you specifically, in more general terms. Also, the IMDB rating is currently at 7.3/10 based on user ratings, so it's in line with the number from Metacritic.

Plenty of people don't like Jurassic Park 3 or The Lost World still went out and watched Jurassic World.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Born Of Cold Light on Aug 11, 2015, 06:24:03 AM
I love how for the toys, they've completely scrapped even the thinnest pretense of being scientifically accurate:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fep.yimg.com%2Fay%2Fdragonballzcentral%2Fjurassic-park-jurassic-world-hero-mashers-carnotaurus-action-figure-hasbro-toys-pre-order-ships-may-14.jpg&hash=7a6036c0544f7104fd715d8000d76207d006b4a1)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fecx.images-amazon.com%2Fimages%2FI%2F716gKHUVUqL._SL1000_.jpg&hash=a47a0f80830e104b138a78c1f05aed9eb6224677)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Finsidepulse.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F01%2FJURASSIC-WORLD-HERO-MASHERS-3.png&hash=5cc3f07d6fc652dfe57a14c52831fc844e2c4cd6)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: System Apollo on Aug 11, 2015, 06:56:05 AM
Quote from: Born Of Cold Light on Aug 11, 2015, 06:24:03 AM
I love how for the toys, they've completely scrapped even the thinnest pretense of being scientifically accurate:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fep.yimg.com%2Fay%2Fdragonballzcentral%2Fjurassic-park-jurassic-world-hero-mashers-carnotaurus-action-figure-hasbro-toys-pre-order-ships-may-14.jpg&hash=7a6036c0544f7104fd715d8000d76207d006b4a1)

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/716gKHUVUqL._SL1000_.jpg

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Finsidepulse.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F01%2FJURASSIC-WORLD-HERO-MASHERS-3.png&hash=5cc3f07d6fc652dfe57a14c52831fc844e2c4cd6)
This is crap! Why even bother with doing such a surreal idea to begin with!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Aug 11, 2015, 08:08:39 AM
Quote from: Born Of Cold Light on Aug 11, 2015, 06:24:03 AMI love how for the toys, they've completely scrapped even the thinnest pretense of being scientifically accurate:

:laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: noname on Aug 11, 2015, 08:22:29 AM
Every boys on earth loves dinosaurs and robots. The movie is going to be a hot seller regardless of the quality. Look at transformers, they are making turd after turd yet it's always dominating the box office.

As for Jurassic world being scientifically inaccurate it probably has to do with children's taste. Kids love grotesque looking monsters and the movie was obviously aiming for little children regardless of the rating. In a business point of view they are doing it right.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 11, 2015, 08:35:13 AM
Quote from: MrSpaceJockey on Aug 11, 2015, 05:13:54 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Aug 11, 2015, 02:18:13 AM
If you didn't like the first film, why bother with the sequel? I don't mean you specifically, in more general terms. Also, the IMDB rating is currently at 7.3/10 based on user ratings, so it's in line with the number from Metacritic.

Plenty of people don't like Jurassic Park 3 or The Lost World still went out and watched Jurassic World.

Exactly.

If Transformers 4 can draw in a massive audience despite a huge negative reaction (not only to it but the other two sequels) and green light a 5th, a JW sequel has nothing to worry about.

Doom you cray cray.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: noname on Aug 11, 2015, 08:40:29 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Aug 11, 2015, 08:35:13 AM
Quote from: MrSpaceJockey on Aug 11, 2015, 05:13:54 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Aug 11, 2015, 02:18:13 AM
If you didn't like the first film, why bother with the sequel? I don't mean you specifically, in more general terms. Also, the IMDB rating is currently at 7.3/10 based on user ratings, so it's in line with the number from Metacritic.

Plenty of people don't like Jurassic Park 3 or The Lost World still went out and watched Jurassic World.

Exactly.

If Transformers 4[/b] can draw in a massive audience despite a huge negative reaction (not only to it but the other two sequels) and green light a 5th, a JW sequel has nothing to worry about.

Doom you cray cray.

That probably has to do with the combination of dinosaurs and robots  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Aug 11, 2015, 09:51:06 AM
Quote from: Born Of Cold Light on Aug 11, 2015, 06:24:03 AM
I love how for the toys, they've completely scrapped even the thinnest pretense of being scientifically accurate:
Not only that but those look like utter crap. Quite in fact they've flopped.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 11, 2015, 11:34:06 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Aug 11, 2015, 08:35:13 AM
Quote from: MrSpaceJockey on Aug 11, 2015, 05:13:54 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Aug 11, 2015, 02:18:13 AM
If you didn't like the first film, why bother with the sequel? I don't mean you specifically, in more general terms. Also, the IMDB rating is currently at 7.3/10 based on user ratings, so it's in line with the number from Metacritic.

Plenty of people don't like Jurassic Park 3 or The Lost World still went out and watched Jurassic World.

Exactly.

If Transformers 4 can draw in a massive audience despite a huge negative reaction (not only to it but the other two sequels) and green light a 5th, a JW sequel has nothing to worry about.

Doom you cray cray.

I hope you're right dude, I really do. I want JW to be on top just as much as you do! I'm just doing my best to manage my expectations so that I don't end up disappointed.

Quote from: Omegamorph on Aug 11, 2015, 09:51:06 AM
Quote from: Born Of Cold Light on Aug 11, 2015, 06:24:03 AM
I love how for the toys, they've completely scrapped even the thinnest pretense of being scientifically accurate:
Not only that but those look like utter crap. Quite in fact they've flopped.

Yup. The dealer I buy from has told me that the Hero Mashers in particular are bombing. The main series of toys is doing well, but beyond that, not much is selling.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 12, 2015, 08:38:35 PM
http://www.scified.com/site/jurassicworld/early-jurassic-world-storyboards-reveal-unused-park-attractions--action-sequences

QuoteDiscovering early storyboards by artist David Lowery (thanks to @ChrisLikesDinos on Twitter) shows us many early designs for Jurassic World attractions and action sequences which never made the final cut. From 'Tree Top Grazers' to Monorail attacks, there's a slew of storyboards to check out:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Aug 15, 2015, 10:05:48 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Aug 11, 2015, 11:34:06 AM
Quote from: Omegamorph on Aug 11, 2015, 09:51:06 AM
Quote from: Born Of Cold Light on Aug 11, 2015, 06:24:03 AM
I love how for the toys, they've completely scrapped even the thinnest pretense of being scientifically accurate:
Not only that but those look like utter crap. Quite in fact they've flopped.

Yup. The dealer I buy from has told me that the Hero Mashers in particular are bombing. The main series of toys is doing well, but beyond that, not much is selling.

Much of the Jurassic World toys, especially the Hero Mashers, seem very juvenile, you can tell because they often have oversized heads and limbs so toddlers can play them; I felt many of the toys from previous movies did more justice to the dinos.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 17, 2015, 01:20:06 PM
This arrived last week. Alien3, FiorinaFury, feast your eyes 8)

http://instagram.com/p/6TfDhMFEoK/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 17, 2015, 04:31:04 PM
Dayum.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Aug 20, 2015, 04:18:54 AM
(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/7b/26/98/7b2698469c18e944cb0d6362d4aebe9f.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DarthJoker45 on Aug 20, 2015, 08:09:37 PM
Apparently, there was going to be a cartoon based on Jurassic Park back in the 90's, but it got canned. Concept artist William Stout was hired on to draw concept drawings for the cartoon, but it only got as far as a trailer.

Here is some of Stout's drawings for it.


Spoiler


(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F36.media.tumblr.com%2F03c37482bc7a3dbb11beb47d737be333%2Ftumblr_ntci9zfTPA1r5cyr0o8_500.jpg&hash=90352fd87a1360b1d044ae7d7aec4ccb850a359b)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F41.media.tumblr.com%2F7cc55f3d28234192c807827d2de17322%2Ftumblr_ntci9zfTPA1r5cyr0o7_500.jpg&hash=f0e32b0a65a184c8188a53344dab6469664233e7)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F41.media.tumblr.com%2F2c7905d5e9895da70c19b0a4aacf14f0%2Ftumblr_ntci9zfTPA1r5cyr0o9_250.jpg&hash=9ddccce347b24e1b07f1fe8aebb5e6b8d9b44ef9)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F41.media.tumblr.com%2F496c28eae7cba5bc0ea09f9ecf4a155c%2Ftumblr_ntci9zfTPA1r5cyr0o3_250.jpg&hash=c54219dcb050cd27d84d349afa19267f9fd8dc8e)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F36.media.tumblr.com%2F47c1de4b1e43d7d3cac71d38b883a024%2Ftumblr_ntci9zfTPA1r5cyr0o2_250.jpg&hash=ac4190c29ad46d2f2de7ab7a375ea03ed85ff8dc)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F40.media.tumblr.com%2Fdf55b1c6b2e3d7d150882ef5cd709d18%2Ftumblr_ntci9zfTPA1r5cyr0o5_500.jpg&hash=b3f635bf031bed64bc7406802d161029460baec0)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F41.media.tumblr.com%2Ffc6d212884d94faae2363260a87c7e46%2Ftumblr_ntci9zfTPA1r5cyr0o1_500.jpg&hash=56f704f186daf6099c7559ee72624a4e8ffcbb11)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F41.media.tumblr.com%2Fed608a1507967ba1187ec838d1cd056d%2Ftumblr_ntci9zfTPA1r5cyr0o10_250.jpg&hash=ac56a6d74c88d899b44e804530730ee407f96a9d)

[close]

Source (http://fromdirectorstevenspielberg.tumblr.com/post/127098097655/one-of-the-greatest-disappointments-about-jurassic)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Aug 20, 2015, 08:19:44 PM
Kinda reminds me of that cancelled Operation: Aliens TV show from '92.

Except the Jurassic Park one doesn't look like it sucks.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Aug 21, 2015, 07:38:41 AM
It's a shame we never had an Aliens show ala Roughneck Chronicles. Loved that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Aug 21, 2015, 07:50:21 AM
Roughnecks was really good fun!

I loved how it made up for the fact it couldn't show violence towards people by just being horrendously cruel to the bugs :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 21, 2015, 12:12:50 PM
Quote from: DarthJoker45 on Aug 20, 2015, 08:09:37 PM
Apparently, there was going to be a cartoon based on Jurassic Park back in the 90's, but it got canned. Concept artist William Stout was hired on to draw concept drawings for the cartoon, but it only got as far as a trailer.

Here is some of Stout's drawings for it.


Spoiler


(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F36.media.tumblr.com%2F03c37482bc7a3dbb11beb47d737be333%2Ftumblr_ntci9zfTPA1r5cyr0o8_500.jpg&hash=90352fd87a1360b1d044ae7d7aec4ccb850a359b)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F41.media.tumblr.com%2F7cc55f3d28234192c807827d2de17322%2Ftumblr_ntci9zfTPA1r5cyr0o7_500.jpg&hash=f0e32b0a65a184c8188a53344dab6469664233e7)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F41.media.tumblr.com%2F2c7905d5e9895da70c19b0a4aacf14f0%2Ftumblr_ntci9zfTPA1r5cyr0o9_250.jpg&hash=9ddccce347b24e1b07f1fe8aebb5e6b8d9b44ef9)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F41.media.tumblr.com%2F496c28eae7cba5bc0ea09f9ecf4a155c%2Ftumblr_ntci9zfTPA1r5cyr0o3_250.jpg&hash=c54219dcb050cd27d84d349afa19267f9fd8dc8e)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F36.media.tumblr.com%2F47c1de4b1e43d7d3cac71d38b883a024%2Ftumblr_ntci9zfTPA1r5cyr0o2_250.jpg&hash=ac4190c29ad46d2f2de7ab7a375ea03ed85ff8dc)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F40.media.tumblr.com%2Fdf55b1c6b2e3d7d150882ef5cd709d18%2Ftumblr_ntci9zfTPA1r5cyr0o5_500.jpg&hash=b3f635bf031bed64bc7406802d161029460baec0)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F41.media.tumblr.com%2Ffc6d212884d94faae2363260a87c7e46%2Ftumblr_ntci9zfTPA1r5cyr0o1_500.jpg&hash=56f704f186daf6099c7559ee72624a4e8ffcbb11)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F41.media.tumblr.com%2Fed608a1507967ba1187ec838d1cd056d%2Ftumblr_ntci9zfTPA1r5cyr0o10_250.jpg&hash=ac56a6d74c88d899b44e804530730ee407f96a9d)

[close]

Source (http://fromdirectorstevenspielberg.tumblr.com/post/127098097655/one-of-the-greatest-disappointments-about-jurassic)

Damn shame, but at least it's the reason we had the Chaos Effect toyline from 1998.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 24, 2015, 03:10:35 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLWn8HngycY

"Stop! We'll zap you!!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Aug 29, 2015, 06:36:53 PM

Bluray Featurettes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8Vnc_ei-TQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKN56F20Ziw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYVsU4bXNMs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYUoNL2ArKc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhNYSQV32aI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HzGZBfbgE3E

http://screencrush.com/jurassic-world-blu-ray-featurettes/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Aug 30, 2015, 01:07:14 AM
I would have love a JP animated series as a kid back in the 90's. I would have watch that shit every day!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 01, 2015, 10:09:58 PM
Yo, Doom! :P

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=40AO2_i-QfI

:UPDATE: Some of my collection will be on eBay soon. I'll keep you guys posted. :-*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 02, 2015, 12:27:57 PM
Very nice! I'll be in first in line for that 3D cinema logo, mark my words.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 02, 2015, 01:00:57 PM
It can't be shipped way too big :-\

Otherwise I'd give it to you!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 03, 2015, 02:07:32 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reactiongifs.us%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F06%2Fraining_david_tennant.gif&hash=a49ce22f7b55d0b2f0756a57038a460d6e4c2474)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 11, 2015, 12:59:15 AM
Out of curiousity, Alien3, what is your rarest item?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Sep 16, 2015, 03:04:25 AM
I just want to stop in and say I loved this movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 16, 2015, 01:21:11 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 11, 2015, 12:59:15 AM
Out of curiousity, Alien3, what is your rarest item?

Aside from all the official stuff we created for Universal I'd say The Lost World souvenir magazine or my T-shirts from '93. The action figures I own are pretty popular.

Quote from: Requiem28 on Sep 16, 2015, 03:04:25 AM
I just want to stop in and say I loved this movie.

Excellent!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Topazora on Sep 16, 2015, 06:06:29 PM
I finally got to see this movie a few weeks ago with some friends.   There were a few scenes that made it very hard for me to buy, but I enjoyed it all the same and will definitely enjoy watching it again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 16, 2015, 06:14:19 PM
Which scenes?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Topazora on Sep 16, 2015, 06:30:27 PM
the three way show of respect between t-rex, raptor and Owen, was a big one.  I also had a hard time buying into the idea that raptors could be trained.  I understand we can train lions and all, but raptors of the Jurassic Park universe, I was under the impression they were uncontrollable, and that's what made them so dangerous.  I guess you can justify it would genetic modification?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 16, 2015, 07:21:07 PM
"It's not about a control, it's a relationship. Based on mutual respect."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Sep 16, 2015, 07:31:52 PM
You keep saying that, but evidently plenty of people heard it in the film and still don't buy it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 16, 2015, 07:45:33 PM
It's so simple though. He's only able to get them to follow directions up to a point. Eventually, their own instincts kick in as seen when Indominus takes command of the squad.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 16, 2015, 10:42:12 PM
Quote from: Topazora on Sep 16, 2015, 06:30:27 PM
I was under the impression they were uncontrollable, and that's what made them so dangerous.

The raptors are as aggressive as they are in the original film because of the way they are treated.

Compare Muldoon's feeding techniques to Owen's.

Muldoon's approach: Isolated from the pack. Transported in a box (not strapped down or anything) with loud noises and fed from a crane.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2Fqz5JmgLQEzs%2Fmaxresdefault.jpg&hash=ec35c65c6f52ac84d61976f41ba49ba7bc046734)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jplegacy.org%2Fjpencyclopedia%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F12%2Flarge_jurassic_park_blu-ray_4.jpg&hash=1552b1a05859e085c28fdb5c10ac21e2df39a029)

Just like the Indominus ;)

Owen's appraoch: Fed by hand, in order of pack hirachy, and with other members of the pack. Not to mention Owen has been with them since birth. Muldoon wasn't.

(https://raptordash.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/tumblr_nponn3kxjy1utx67fo2_500.gif)

The raptors in JW are still extremely dangerous but their relationship with Owen complicates things which we hadn't seen before.

Quote from: Topazora on Sep 16, 2015, 06:30:27 PM
the three way show of respect between t-rex, raptor and Owen, was a big one.

Plus I don't think the Rex was showing any respect I think it just couldn't be bothered to attack Blue because it had just been in a fight. As Tembo says: "Predators don't eat when they're not hungry."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 16, 2015, 10:49:27 PM
I think too in that moment, Blue was wary because she knew she couldn't take on a T.rex by herself. She's tough but not invincible. Better to let bygones be bygones and live to fight another day.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: stephen on Sep 17, 2015, 02:57:04 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 16, 2015, 10:49:27 PM
I think too in that moment, Blue was wary because she knew she couldn't take on a T.rex by herself. She's tough but not invincible. Better to let bygones be bygones and live to fight another day.

Crap it was corny as all hell.

I hated that shot.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 17, 2015, 03:39:28 AM
Why? We already know the raptors are intelligent. Why is it so hard to fathom that she understands that Rexy isn't her enemy in that moment?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Sep 17, 2015, 04:25:03 AM
Its not like predators in real life act any different in situations like that. Bears and Tigers don't want to fight--they want to eat smaller prey.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Sep 17, 2015, 07:40:46 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 17, 2015, 03:39:28 AMWhy? We already know the raptors are intelligent. Why is it so hard to fathom that she understands that Rexy isn't her enemy in that moment?

It was just the way it played out. It felt like cheesy, childish monster movie moment.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Sep 17, 2015, 10:50:20 AM
The whole end fight was like a Jurassic Avengers type of thing. I've warmed up to it but it's definitely not the direction I would have gone with.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 17, 2015, 12:00:46 PM
Would you look at it as Jurassic Avengers if Avengers had not come out? ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Sep 17, 2015, 01:06:07 PM
No, I'd look at it as Jurassic Godzilla. It was just a monster fight by the end.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 17, 2015, 01:11:49 PM
That's a bad thing?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Sep 17, 2015, 01:29:02 PM
For me it was. Dinosaurs turned into cheesy movie monsters wasn't what I wanted.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 17, 2015, 01:42:57 PM
Thats fair enough but what made them monsters to you?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 17, 2015, 01:48:12 PM
Technically they were monsters, not true dinosaurs. Remember Grant's speech in JP3?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 17, 2015, 01:54:36 PM
Genetically engineered theme park monsters to be precise :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Sep 17, 2015, 02:15:51 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 17, 2015, 01:42:57 PMThats fair enough but what made them monsters to you?

I dunno, just the way it was done.

When I watch the first two Jurassic Park films, I feel like I'm watching real animals. Even when the T-rex is running around San Diego in The Lost World, I still get the impression it's just an animal that's been thrown into a situation it doesn't know how to handle (not to mention the fact it's hyped up on stimulants at the time).

In the newest film, the dinosaurs don't come across as real animals any more (at least, not by the end of the movie). It was just the little things. Like how the dinosaur fights have now deteriorated to long, drawn-out monster movie beatdowns where they keep throwing each other through stuff like its a Godzilla film. Or when whatsherface opens the T-rex pen, and it's just stood right there, as if it's been waiting patiently all along for its chance to get into the brawl. And all the cheesy glory shots of the dinosaurs looking good for the camera. It was all just kinda daft.

That's why I personally didn't like it all that much.

Oh, and the characters also sucked. The first two had some really memorable characters in them. Sam Neill, Jeff Goldblum, Richard Attenborough, Bob Peck and Pete Postlethwaite were all awesome in their roles and I remember them all fondly. In the new film I already struggle to remember who anyone was.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 17, 2015, 02:27:00 PM
Claire. Her name was Claire.

I attribute the Rex's behaviour to a dog seeing its owner holding a ball. Rex recognized the flair as something to chase since it was used in a Pavlovian way in the film to get it to eat. Remember the feeding scene with the goat? That's probably why it didn't outright attack Claire. In that vein, the only problem with the scene is that it didn't chomp her up as soon as she was out of her paddock and Claire hadn't begun running away earlier.

For anyone wondering why Rex and I.rex went at it, they're two big predators in each other's territory. It's that simple.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 17, 2015, 03:06:28 PM
Plus the Rex was probably nearby the door because of the noise the raptors and Indominus were making. Not to mention the slow moving door opening annnnd its not a massive paddock.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: bobby brown on Sep 17, 2015, 03:09:19 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 17, 2015, 03:06:28 PM
Plus the Rex was probably nearby the door because of the noise the raptors and Indominus were making. Not to mention the slow moving door opening annnnd its not a massive paddock.

yes but it was lame.

I dont need an explanation to make them feel less like CGI movie monsters, Because that's all they were.
The first movies portrayed animals.

The new movie captured nothing of the original movie magic that was spielberg's craft.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Sep 17, 2015, 03:10:36 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 17, 2015, 03:06:28 PMPlus the Rex was probably nearby the door because of the noise the raptors and Indominus were making. Not to mention the slow moving door opening annnnd its not a massive paddock.

But it was just standing there. It wasn't just arriving, it wasn't agitated by the commotion outside, nothing. It just stood there politely waiting for the money shot. Stuff like that spoiled it for me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 17, 2015, 03:30:42 PM
Quote from: bobby brown on Sep 17, 2015, 03:09:19 PM
The new movie captured nothing of the original movie magic that was spielberg's craft.

"...but let's be honest. No one's impressed by a dinosaur anymore."

Thank you for proving the film correct.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 17, 2015, 04:06:52 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Sep 17, 2015, 03:10:36 PM
But it was just standing there. It wasn't just arriving,

Did we see the same film? It clearly walks towards the door from the dark depths of its paddock.

Quote from: bobby brown on Sep 17, 2015, 03:09:19 PM
I dont need an explanation to make them feel less like CGI movie monsters, Because that's all they were.
The first movies portrayed animals.

But what was unanimal like about them?

For me the JW dinosaurs acted just as their previous incarnations did.
Not just from JP but TLW and JP3.



Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Sep 17, 2015, 04:57:31 PM
I think part of the problem you guy are trying to address comes from public perception of dinosaurs. Real dinosaurs acted like birds-- feathers, lots of energy, intelligent, unpredictable.

In the first film, I'd say they were all a little clumsy and slow compared to JW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: bobby brown on Sep 17, 2015, 06:33:56 PM
Quote
But what was unanimal like about them?

For me the JW dinosaurs acted just as their previous incarnations did.
Not just from JP but TLW and JP3.


Its not about the feather issue, at all. I accept JP´s dinos as actual dinos in this fictitious world.
Its more about how its done. Well, its not easy to put finger on it exactly, but I'll try.

The first films put a lot of effort into making the animals move with weight, and make them behave a tad bit "imperfect" like actual animals do. JW´s monsters where just to glorified, and fast. Moving with impossible speed and flexibility. Even if we know today JP´s dinos where scientifically inaccurate, the movie makers at least tried to present it with as much realism as possible.

You think flying pterosaurs carrying humans around and a dinosaur teamup brawl is a natural progression of that mentality?

Not to mention the baby dino petting zoo, Those dinosaurs probably cost millions to produce, and you let kids play around with them and ride them!? those animals are fu**ing fragile. Also I didn't like that hologram in the visitor centre. just to futuristic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 17, 2015, 07:26:07 PM
Quote from: bobby brown on Sep 17, 2015, 06:33:56 PM
The first films put a lot of effort into making the animals move with weight, and make them behave a tad bit "imperfect" like actual animals do. JW´s monsters where just to glorified, and fast. Moving with impossible speed and flexibility. Even if we know today JP´s dinos where scientifically inaccurate, the movie makers at least tried to present it with as much realism as possible.

Agreed 100%. That's why the CG doesn't work in this film. You can tell they're CG creations and don't feel real like they did in the first two.

Quote from: bobby brown on Sep 17, 2015, 06:33:56 PM
You think flying pterosaurs carrying humans around and a dinosaur teamup brawl is a natural progression of that mentality?

No. It was totally unrealistic. No pterosaur in the fossil record would possess enough strength to lift up a large fish, much less a human being. But pterosaurs attacking humans is common in dino movies (see One Million Years B.C. and The Valley of Gwangi) so I accept it as part of the fun.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Sep 17, 2015, 08:36:17 PM
Quote from: bobby brown on Sep 17, 2015, 06:33:56 PMNot to mention the baby dino petting zoo, Those dinosaurs probably cost millions to produce, and you let kids play around with them and ride them!? those animals are fu**ing fragile.

There's also the fact a baby Triceratops could do some serious damage to a child if it felt even slightly inclined. The whole concept is daft.

It's like how the original film has that bit where they try to feed the T-rex with the tethered goat, and Grant points out how silly it is. That voice of reason seemed to be missing in the new film
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 17, 2015, 09:09:52 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Sep 17, 2015, 08:36:17 PM
Quote from: bobby brown on Sep 17, 2015, 06:33:56 PMNot to mention the baby dino petting zoo, Those dinosaurs probably cost millions to produce, and you let kids play around with them and ride them!? those animals are fu**ing fragile.

There's also the fact a baby Triceratops could do some serious damage to a child if it felt even slightly inclined. The whole concept is daft.

The same could be said of any petting zoo in the modern world. Hell, even horseback riding carries risks. That's no reason to not let kids play with young herbivorous dinosaurs in a petting zoo.

Quote from: HuDaFuK on Sep 17, 2015, 08:36:17 PM
It's like how the original film has that bit where they try to feed the T-rex with the tethered goat, and Grant points out how silly it is. That voice of reason seemed to be missing in the new film

Not exactly. He points out that T.rex doesn't want to be fed, but wants to hunt. Jurassic World shows us that it ends up working in the end because they had conditioned her to react.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: stephen on Sep 18, 2015, 05:40:25 AM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Sep 17, 2015, 07:40:46 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 17, 2015, 03:39:28 AMWhy? We already know the raptors are intelligent. Why is it so hard to fathom that she understands that Rexy isn't her enemy in that moment?

It was just the way it played out. It felt like cheesy, childish monster movie moment.

This - just cheesy.

Don't get me wrong - I enjoyed the movie quite a lot actually.

I saw this cheesy moment a mile away though and I was saying to myself - "don't do it don't do it" and then, they did it.

It was already pushing the limit of cheesiness with the three way battle but I was kind of just buying that and then it pushed the cheese level through the roof.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Sep 18, 2015, 07:48:59 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 17, 2015, 09:09:52 PMThe same could be said of any petting zoo in the modern world. Hell, even horseback riding carries risks. That's no reason to not let kids play with young herbivorous dinosaurs in a petting zoo.

Name one zoo in the entire world that lets kids pet and ride baby rhinos.

Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 17, 2015, 09:09:52 PMNot exactly. He points out that T.rex doesn't want to be fed, but wants to hunt.

And in doing so points out the ignorance of the people who planned the park.

The new film took that ignorance and ran with it. There was no one saying, "Do you realise how silly this all its?"
Title: A~WES
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 18, 2015, 09:14:15 AM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Sep 17, 2015, 08:36:17 PM
Quote from: bobby brown on Sep 17, 2015, 06:33:56 PMNot to mention the baby dino petting zoo, Those dinosaurs probably cost millions to produce, and you let kids play around with them and ride them!? those animals are fu**ing fragile.

There's also the fact a baby Triceratops could do some serious damage to a child if it felt even slightly inclined. The whole concept is daft.

The irony is the riding a trike concept comes from the original film. :laugh:

(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/76/3c/62/763c626dc68f70e1b83a6d062b75ed8a.jpg)

Quote from: HuDaFuK on Sep 17, 2015, 08:36:17 PM
It's like how the original film has that bit where they try to feed the T-rex with the tethered goat, and Grant points out how silly it is. That voice of reason seemed to be missing in the new film

Except the scene where Owen talks to Claire about how they're methods of feeding the Indominus is wrong, or when he debunks any ideas Hoskins comes up with. Or the scene where Masrani confronts Wu in hindsight about their creation. The film is littered with voice of reason moments its just this time the film is set in a world where having an open dinosaur park is part of the norm.

Quote from: HuDaFuK on Sep 18, 2015, 07:48:59 AM
Name one zoo in the entire world that lets kids pet and ride baby rhinos.

It's not unfathomable...

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.telegraph.co.uk%2Fmultimedia%2Farchive%2F02963%2FCopy-of-Mkt_2963272b.jpg&hash=9815ea30c7138338fb9cd38e4944c61ddfea7f34)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rhinoresourcecenter.com%2Fpictures%2Fl%2F1350457192%2FRiding-rhino-Hartley.jpg&hash=c2602953f05adee31a6b5a4b5c11bb9b9ed4d2f6)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Flowres-picturecabinet.com.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com%2F43%2Fmain%2F50%2F128896.jpg&hash=b080669c58b63b8f52810160e70c4236c0abfb06)
[close]

Quote from: bobby brown on Sep 17, 2015, 06:33:56 PM
The first films put a lot of effort into making the animals move with weight, and make them behave a tad bit "imperfect" like actual animals do. JW´s monsters where just to glorified, and fast. Moving with impossible speed and flexibility. Even if we know today JP´s dinos where scientifically inaccurate, the movie makers at least tried to present it with as much realism as possible.

You sound like Wu from the novel! :D This paragraph reminds me of this section of the novel.
I highly recommend listening to it!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GBB62IgLoI
Title: Re: A~WES
Post by: HuDaFuK on Sep 18, 2015, 09:21:23 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 18, 2015, 09:14:15 AMExcept the scene where Owen talks to Claire about how they're methods of feeding the Indominus is wrong, or when he debunks any ideas Hoskins comes up with. Or the scene where Masrani confronts Wu in hindsight about their creation.

Sure, but they kinda fall on deaf ears when there was so much else going on that struck me as silly.

Is weaponising raptors daft? Of course. But you're already doing plenty of other dumb stuff, why not go the whole hog? The damage had already been done for me.

Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 18, 2015, 09:14:15 AMIt's not unfathomable...

They certainly don't look like zoos though.

A rich white colonist propping his kids on top of his pet rhino for a laugh is a long, long way from a zoo letting children ride the animal exhibits. Especially a freaking dinosaur.
Title: Re: A~WES
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 18, 2015, 09:35:27 AM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Sep 18, 2015, 09:21:23 AM
A rich white colonist propping his kids on top of his pet rhino for a laugh is a long, long way from a zoo letting children ride the animal exhibits. Especially a freaking dinosaur.

That is why I said its not unfathomable.

Quote from: HuDaFuK on Sep 18, 2015, 09:21:23 AM
Is weaponising raptors daft? Of course. But you're already doing plenty of other dumb stuff, why not go the whole hog? The damage had already been done for me.

The whole idea of cloning dinosaurs and putting them in a zoo is daft but its entertainment.

Let's not forget we're dealing with a fictional universe where a man and child are chased down a tree by a car only to have it crash on top of them and the first thing said is the boy saying "Well, we're back in the car again." in reality he'd be crying, or screaming, or dead.

The same boy who survives falling in the car from a vertical drop, being electrocuted by 10,000 watts, escaping from raptors in a kitchen and having a rib cage smashed on top of him.

It's what I like call hyper-reality.
Title: Re: A~WES
Post by: HuDaFuK on Sep 18, 2015, 10:01:56 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 18, 2015, 09:35:27 AMThat is why I said its not unfathomable.

Health and safety would love to hear from you :)

[/quote]
Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 18, 2015, 09:35:27 AMThe whole idea of cloning dinosaurs and putting them in a zoo is daft but its entertainment.

But again, it's simply about the subtleties of how it's done. In the original two films, Spielberg got things across in a way that I bought and accepted as believable. In the films since, they haven't done that, and Jurassic World is the worst of the lot on that front. There were just too many moments that stood out as silly.

You simply asked why I thought the film was cheesy and daft. I'm telling you why. Your arguments haven't changed my opinion, just like I don't expect mine to change yours. I just didn't buy into the film, and while it was entertaining enough, I thought it was silly in a way the first two weren't.
Title: Re: A~WES
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 18, 2015, 11:01:03 AM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Sep 18, 2015, 10:01:56 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 18, 2015, 09:35:27 AMThat is why I said its not unfathomable.

Health and safety would love to hear from you :)

Well luckily we live in a world where heath and safety is 100% accurate...oh wait.

To boot though...

"I told you how many times ... we needed locking mechanisms on the vehicle doors?"

Heath and safety has always been poorly handled within the JP universe. I don't see how a child riding a baby trike is anything shocking or new. It's ridiculousness is the reason people go and see these films. To watch things go wrong. Saying that, the petting zoo had no visible problems, if they had it was off-screen.

Quote from: HuDaFuK on Sep 18, 2015, 10:01:56 AM
But again, it's simply about the subtleties of how it's done. In the original two films, Spielberg got things across in a way that I bought and accepted as believable. In the films since, they haven't done that, and Jurassic World is the worst of the lot on that front. There were just too many moments that stood out as silly.

Well if they ever do clone dinosaurs and decide to open a park we'll certainly see how silly the movies are but alas.

But wait...

Quote from: HuDaFuK on Sep 18, 2015, 10:01:56 AM
In the original two films, Spielberg got things across in a way that I bought and accepted as believable.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fyouoffendmeyouoffendmyfamily.com%2Fwordpress%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F06%2Flw-17.gif&hash=4b14761907e0da52f0ed73e13bef4211a8b81348)

Escapism is a fickle thing.
Title: Re: A~WES
Post by: HuDaFuK on Sep 18, 2015, 11:09:56 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 18, 2015, 11:01:03 AMhttp://youoffendmeyouoffendmyfamily.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/lw-17.gif

Escapism is a fickle thing.

Still less stupid than a guy leading raptors into battle on a motorcycle ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 18, 2015, 11:29:23 AM
Thats a matter of perspective.

We had 45 minutes of understanding Owen's relationship to the Raptors, and only one sentence where we learnt Kelly had dabbled in gymnastics.

The JP films have always been silly in certain aspects, but over the years (much like the Alien films) they get the reputation of being works of fiction which cement themselves in heavily in reality, however thats just not true, if you take a step back.

However, thats just my understanding of the matter.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 18, 2015, 12:49:19 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Sep 18, 2015, 07:48:59 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 17, 2015, 09:09:52 PMThe same could be said of any petting zoo in the modern world. Hell, even horseback riding carries risks. That's no reason to not let kids play with young herbivorous dinosaurs in a petting zoo.

Name one zoo in the entire world that lets kids pet and ride baby rhinos.

I can think of plenty of farms that let kids ride adult horses. But that's none of my business *sips tea*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Sep 18, 2015, 01:07:39 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 18, 2015, 12:49:19 PMI can think of plenty of farms that let kids ride adult horses. But that's none of my business *sips tea*

Thanks for conveniently suggesting a rhino is exactly the same as a domesticated horse.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 18, 2015, 01:10:15 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Sep 18, 2015, 01:07:39 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Sep 18, 2015, 12:49:19 PMI can think of plenty of farms that let kids ride adult horses. But that's none of my business *sips tea*

Thanks for conveniently suggesting a rhino is exactly the same as a domesticated horse.

My point is that it's a large animal and still poses a risk to humans, domesticated or not. I've seen, and experienced unfortunately, some brutal accidents with kids on horses.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Sep 18, 2015, 01:16:06 PM
Of course. But it's still a totally different kettle of fish.

I'd stand in a field with a horse. I wouldn't jump in a pen with a rhino. Even a young one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: bobby brown on Sep 18, 2015, 03:15:02 PM
And not to mention they are super expensive manufactured extinct animals.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 18, 2015, 04:44:22 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Sep 18, 2015, 01:16:06 PM
Of course. But it's still a totally different kettle of fish.

I'd stand in a field with a horse. I wouldn't jump in a pen with a rhino. Even a young one.

They were probably domesticated at birth, like horses. Hence they're gentler nature than wild ones. I'd say a more grievous problem was with letting the visitors roll around in the Gyrospheres in the fields with all of the adult herbivores.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 18, 2015, 05:27:51 PM
Let's not forget those tour vehicles which don't have locks on the doors.

Perfect for lawyers to leave open.

:laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 18, 2015, 08:14:05 PM
Or park employees who don't even know anything about the animals they're charged with raising/caring/protecting, re: Nedry and the Dilophosaurus
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 23, 2015, 09:17:09 AM
We interviewed the director and he spilled a little bit of info abut JW2.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BFoF2dbap8
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 24, 2015, 01:10:55 AM
Oh man. Already I am psyched!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Sep 24, 2015, 05:56:29 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 23, 2015, 09:17:09 AM
We interviewed the director and he spilled a little bit of info abut JW2.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BFoF2dbap8

I like the quote he used. It made me think of dinosaurs living in the wild with other modern-day animals.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Oct 03, 2015, 06:56:45 PM
Jurassic World (2015)

Its been 14 years since 'Jurassic Park III' (which I can't remember a sodding thing about). 2015 seems to be the year in which Hollywood digs up its old franchises, and yet surprisingly it hasn't ended in complete disaster. Again that's pretty unbelievable considering they started production for another Jurassic Park flick back in 2004 and was in development hell pretty much up to the present day.

So what are we up against here then mateys, the first classic movie pitted a small team of people against an island full of dinosaurs that were on the loose!..oh this film is exactly the same? errmm...oh. Well OK its not exactly the same, this time the park is open and fully operational with lots of dino attractions for all ages. The difference being, instead of a T-Rex getting loose and becoming the main antagonist, its a fictional genetically modified dinosaur with extra spikes and teeth that can transform int...oops, getting carried away there. But seriously it is that stupid, they create a dinosaur that has virtually every flippin' assault skill you can think of, the bloody thing can virtually cloak itself, pfft!

Yeah so we follow two sets of people around, firstly the inevitable kiddie characters with curiously retro looking haircuts (well one of them at least). Have you ever noticed these modern movies try to copy the hairdos from similar themed movies of the late 70's and 80's? The other pairing are the two adults consisting of Chris Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard, let the cliched stereotypical onslaught commence!

Right so lets talk about this park, there are all sorts of dino attractions such as a SeaWorld type show featuring a shit-your-pants sized aquatic killing machine sea monster, canoe rides down a pleasant jungle river with harmless herbivores, and a little paddy area for the very young to play with baby dinosaurs. Right so its clearly a spin on various famous theme parks/wildlife preserves such as Disney and say...Gatorland (and obviously SeaWorld), in movie terms its 'Jaws 3', moving on.

All the characters in this movie are horrible predictable stereotypical cliches, and exactly the same as the first movie. Pratt's character is basically Indiana Jones, Howard's character is the typical soulless corporate bitch who you think might get eaten for being a soulless corporate bitch, but does in fact turn into a watered down Ellen Ripley. The kids are just the same as any other kid characters, the military types are just the same as any other military types wanting to use something for errr....military purposes, the science guys are all whitecoats and kinda dubious and the park controllers in the control room are the comedic relief.

Now apart from the plot being exactly the same as before, not only that, but they completely rip-off other movies too. There are not one, but two main sequences that, in my view, copy such movies as 'Aliens' and 'Predator 2'. Firstly the containment team getting wiped out by the I-Rex (I.Rex, iphone...lame play modern technology), and then the whole thing with the raptors wearing headcam gear, cute but again comes off like said movies. I also find it hard to believe that the original site (buildings) from the original movie would still be fully loaded with equipment and vehicles, plus left unlocked! And how exactly did that gyrosphere thing work? its suppose to be a ride right, yet the people inside have full control and can go anywhere they want?! I thought it was on a track or something at first, surely allowing unlimited control screams disaster.

Now don't get me wrong, I did enjoy this movie to a degree, there are some nice moments of excitement and its not entirely blood free either (which was nice). The location work is lush and stunning, makes me wanna go to Hawaii, the acting is solid and engaging and I liked the gigantic sea monster thing. The problem is there is nothing new here, at all! Its just a rerun of the first movie with the same characters. I mean come on, who didn't guess that the giant sea monster was obvious foreshadowing for the finale, or that the T-Rex would inevitably come into it because everybody has a hard-on for T-Rex's apparently. If the I.Rex is such an intelligent creature why would it go around killing everything for fun? I mean yeah...for fun, sure, its a sadist, I get it. But surely most creatures, especially intelligent, wouldn't act like that unless it was pushed or forced to. To top that the CGI on show is pretty average really, the I.Rex just looks like a pale T-Rex with horns and somehow CGI on the whole isn't as good as the original movie, although dino eyes look good that's for sure.

I get the analogy here, how modern society just wants bigger, better, badder, faster etc...We are all greedy, never content, never happy, taking things for granted and of course, the corporate excess machine. The fact that regular dinosaurs have become boring to people, they want bigger, more dangerous ones, more blood and gore...are we not entertained??!! You know, how could anyone not be in awe over a simple dinosaur? The whole thing speaks volumes about us as a society and the movie industry (naturally), yet here we all are lapping this shit up, this movie did amazingly well, how? why? The movie pokes fun at itself for these reasons and simultaneously falls in the same trap yet again.

6.5/10
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Oct 04, 2015, 07:39:12 PM
I saw this again the other night. The first times watching it I had missed there's actually a short moment when Blue is riding the damn T-Rex. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Oct 04, 2015, 07:47:22 PM
I can sympathise with Blue there, we've all wanted to do it at some point. I was out for a walk today and thinking how much easier it'd be if I was riding a tyrannosaur.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 06, 2015, 08:03:08 AM
Quote from: Shasvre on Oct 04, 2015, 07:39:12 PM
I saw this again the other night. The first times watching it I had missed there's actually a short moment when Blue is riding the damn T-Rex. :D

It still amazes me that they pulled that off.

It's awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 07, 2015, 04:19:01 AM
Quote from: Shasvre on Oct 04, 2015, 07:39:12 PM
I saw this again the other night. The first times watching it I had missed there's actually a short moment when Blue is riding the damn T-Rex. :D

Not really riding so much as using her as a platform.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 07, 2015, 07:11:12 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7m2jTM-0gEc
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Oct 07, 2015, 07:19:32 AM
Oh that is just unfair man. :P

You saw how that park was operated; anyone would develop a strong sense of indifference in that situation.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 07, 2015, 02:05:07 PM
Lol, loved it. In Muldoon's defense though, JP was beta, JW was final release so that might explain why Owen handled the raptors so much better. You did leave out one bit of stupidity though. Why did Muldoon only load one shotgun shell before hunting the raptors?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Oct 07, 2015, 02:19:01 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 07, 2015, 02:05:07 PMWhy did Muldoon only load one shotgun shell before hunting the raptors?

He doesn't?

Admittedly I can't remember how the scene goes off the top of my head, but don't we just catch then of of him loading the shotgun? He could easily have loaded more shells before we see him.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 07, 2015, 02:34:58 PM
We only see one. When you think about how quickly the scene moves, he wouldn't have had time to load more than that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Oct 07, 2015, 02:44:03 PM
Doesn't Hammond go get the map of the bunker complex in the time Muldoon's arming up though?

I always assumed it was just expedited editing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 07, 2015, 03:06:09 PM
Two at most in that time frame. Still not nearly enough.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 07, 2015, 03:33:32 PM
Muldoon the fool :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bat Chain Puller on Oct 07, 2015, 10:14:46 PM
In defense of Movie Muldoon: He cut his teeth on regular big game animals. He was only scratching the surface of understanding these dinosaurs in comparison to Owen who could have been learning about them most of his life (within the JP universe that is.)

So over confidence, a degree of arrogance, and good ol' fashion movie tropes brought Movie Moldoon down in the end

Book Muldoon was a little more realistic. He and the Park in general were more prepared. Had more shit in place to take out dinosaurs in case some got free. He brought down the Rex and took out at least one Raptor with a rocket launcher if memory serves. He also came across as more human. Flawed. Knew when he was outmatched. Dealt with it by drinking I believe.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Oct 07, 2015, 10:26:09 PM
Mm, book Muldoon's a rare example of a Crichton non-villain/hero with more character traits than his job description.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 07, 2015, 10:57:57 PM
Quote from: Bat Chain Puller on Oct 07, 2015, 10:14:46 PM
In defense of Movie Muldoon: He cut his teeth on regular big game animals. He was only scratching the surface of understanding these dinosaurs in comparison to Owen who could have been learning about them most of his life (within the JP universe that is.)

So over confidence, a degree of arrogance, and good ol' fashion movie tropes brought Movie Moldoon down in the end

Book Muldoon was a little more realistic. He and the Park in general were more prepared. Had more shit in place to take out dinosaurs in case some got free. He brought down the Rex and took out at least one Raptor with a rocket launcher if memory serves. He also came across as more human. Flawed. Knew when he was outmatched. Dealt with it by drinking I believe.

Not against the Rex. Hammond specifically told him not to as it was a valuable asset, a la Masrani and the Indominus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Oct 08, 2015, 01:42:24 AM
After watching the video, the last tidbits about the socks were hilarious!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Oct 10, 2015, 08:59:28 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 07, 2015, 07:11:12 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7m2jTM-0gEc

The shift from the clip of Owen controlling the raptors to the chaos at the cage clip with Muldoon is HILARIOUS.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: pred169 on Oct 10, 2015, 10:31:26 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Sep 17, 2015, 02:15:51 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 17, 2015, 01:42:57 PMThats fair enough but what made them monsters to you?

I dunno, just the way it was done.

When I watch the first two Jurassic Park films, I feel like I'm watching real animals. Even when the T-rex is running around San Diego in The Lost World, I still get the impression it's just an animal that's been thrown into a situation it doesn't know how to handle (not to mention the fact it's hyped up on stimulants at the time).

In the newest film, the dinosaurs don't come across as real animals any more (at least, not by the end of the movie). It was just the little things. Like how the dinosaur fights have now deteriorated to long, drawn-out monster movie beatdowns where they keep throwing each other through stuff like its a Godzilla film. Or when whatsherface opens the T-rex pen, and it's just stood right there, as if it's been waiting patiently all along for its chance to get into the brawl. And all the cheesy glory shots of the dinosaurs looking good for the camera. It was all just kinda daft.

That's why I personally didn't like it all that much.

Oh, and the characters also sucked. The first two had some really memorable characters in them. Sam Neill, Jeff Goldblum, Richard Attenborough, Bob Peck and Pete Postlethwaite were all awesome in their roles and I remember them all fondly. In the new film I already struggle to remember who anyone was.
I see your point but I tend to agree with others here as well. The behavior of the animal is completely dictated by the type of environment it is used to. You see crocs do the same thing with their handlers at crocodile parks. They have the ability to attack the handlers but don't because they recognize a gesture as a sign of food.
   Also if animals are subjected to being around people for a majority of their life they tend to get rather lathargic. I mean that in the sense of wild animals in captivity losing their aggressiveness. If you go to a zoo nowadays you don't see the Lions or rhinos or tigers charging the tourists.  Even the snake exhibits. Cobras and mambas are highly aggressive species and yet in the zoos you barely get one to hood or acknowledge you.
   I know it's hard to stomach but remember these dinosaurs have been in this park being subjected to thousands of visitors a day everyday for 22 years. It's entirely possible they have grown complacent or lathargic due to them having no need for aggression. They are fed daily (probably many times a day), they are kept separated so there is no territorial disputes, they're all female no mating disputes, and again they have been subjected to this for their entire life. And of course the indominus was secluded and had very little interaction at all so the aggression factor was definitely  there.
   I may not agree with the direction he chose to go. But I could see it as an accurate representation of how the animals would act in that situation. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 10, 2015, 10:55:29 PM
Quote from: Requiem28 on Oct 10, 2015, 08:59:28 PM
The shift from the clip of Owen controlling the raptors to the chaos at the cage clip with Muldoon is HILARIOUS.

I know right?!

Muldoon is an amazing and funny character to watch.

More character deconstructions are coming in future podcasts.

Quote from: pred169 on Oct 10, 2015, 10:31:26 PM
these dinosaurs have been in this park being subjected to thousands of visitors a day everyday for 22 years.

10 years Jurassic World was open.

Quote from: pred169 on Oct 10, 2015, 10:31:26 PM
Also if animals are subjected to being around people for a majority of their life they tend to get rather lathargic. I mean that in the sense of wild animals in captivity losing their aggressiveness. If you go to a zoo nowadays you don't see the Lions or rhinos or tigers charging the tourists.

Exactly.

As Claire says in JW: "Today's kids look at a Stegosaurus like an elephant in a city zoo"

Which in reality it would kinda be like that.

Even Grant says something very similar in JP when they're feeding the Brachiosaurus: "Think of it as... kind of like a big cow."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vermillion on Oct 11, 2015, 12:08:19 AM
Owen was just dumb.  He really did nothing.
Raptors knew the iPod Rex was always in charge. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 11, 2015, 12:12:08 AM
Really? :-\

The film established well he knew where he stood in the line of things. But he wasn't afraid of letting the command levels know of his opinion, which were all for the good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 14, 2015, 03:32:10 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8tmJbaFuYM
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 14, 2015, 09:22:50 AM
Funny in parts but lazy in others. ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 15, 2015, 04:20:44 AM
I'm pretty sure Dan Murrell had a hand in writing that one in particular.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 19, 2015, 02:18:23 PM
Picked up my Blu-ray today.

So f**king happy!

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CRrmj54XAAQdXiy.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Oct 19, 2015, 02:39:19 PM
Never realized you were British.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 19, 2015, 02:41:44 PM
Really? Haha

Have been all my life :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Oct 19, 2015, 05:32:09 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 14, 2015, 03:32:10 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8tmJbaFuYM

Yep, I still don't get how this film did so well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 19, 2015, 05:34:15 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 19, 2015, 02:18:23 PM
Picked up my Blu-ray today.

So f**king happy!

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CRrmj54XAAQdXiy.jpg

I have three definite editions on pre-order: Wal-Mart Lunch Box Exclusive, Best Buy Edition with a T-Shirt, and the Limited Edition Gift Set. Yes, I'm going overboard here 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 19, 2015, 09:44:34 PM
From what I can see it looks as if they've been working on the CG more since its theatrical release. It looks amazing.

Also...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iW6s6GqhT6Q
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Oct 20, 2015, 01:16:26 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 19, 2015, 05:34:15 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 19, 2015, 02:18:23 PM
Picked up my Blu-ray today.

So f**king happy!

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CRrmj54XAAQdXiy.jpg

I have three definite editions on pre-order: Wal-Mart Lunch Box Exclusive, Best Buy Edition with a T-Shirt, and the Limited Edition Gift Set. Yes, I'm going overboard here 8)
No sir, you are not going overboard. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Oct 20, 2015, 07:35:53 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 19, 2015, 09:44:34 PMFrom what I can see it looks as if they've been working on the CG more since its theatrical release. It looks amazing.

Really?! I'd be really surprised if they had. I've never heard of that happening before.

Wait, I tell a lie. Transporter 2. But that's hardly a movie in the same league.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Oct 20, 2015, 08:59:20 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 19, 2015, 09:44:34 PM
From what I can see it looks as if they've been working on the CG more since its theatrical release. It looks amazing.

Also...

Can this be confirmed somehow?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 20, 2015, 10:08:57 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fclockworkbrothers.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F10%2Fa-clockwork-orange-a-clockwork-orange-14752407-965-577.jpg&hash=427547e252ac57df9e9fb8bf94f798bc30e57459)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vermillion on Oct 20, 2015, 03:28:43 PM
Pull up!  Pull up!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 21, 2015, 02:02:46 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUoL5xcbKCg
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 21, 2015, 04:27:04 PM
God dammit, I was going to ask if you wanted to do a joint commentary! Bah.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 21, 2015, 04:31:43 PM
Still can man.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 21, 2015, 10:38:52 PM
I'd be honoured. Let's figure out a time and place. Also, on the CG, I was playing the Indominus/Ankylosaurus fight via the digital copy and yeah, it did look slightly better. Though I wonder if that's due to my viewing it on a 24" monitor vs. a massive IMAX screen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Hubbs on Oct 22, 2015, 04:47:37 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 21, 2015, 02:02:46 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUoL5xcbKCg

Didn't know you did this kind of thing, nice, kudos :)

I know someone asked me about commentaries awhile back (for Fury Road) but I can't remember who hehe.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Oct 22, 2015, 07:50:24 AM
Watched this again last night. Still love it. Not as much as I loved Fury Road but it's up there as one of those great fun films from this year.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 22, 2015, 08:29:09 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 21, 2015, 10:38:52 PM
I'd be honoured. Let's figure out a time and place. Also, on the CG, I was playing the Indominus/Ankylosaurus fight via the digital copy and yeah, it did look slightly better. Though I wonder if that's due to my viewing it on a 24" monitor vs. a massive IMAX screen.

You don't own the blu-ray? It's way better than the Digital copy!

Quote from: Hubbs on Oct 22, 2015, 04:47:37 AM
Didn't know you did this kind of thing, nice, kudos :)

Yeah man. I have quite a few on my channel now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 22, 2015, 02:02:36 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Oct 22, 2015, 08:29:09 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 21, 2015, 10:38:52 PM
I'd be honoured. Let's figure out a time and place. Also, on the CG, I was playing the Indominus/Ankylosaurus fight via the digital copy and yeah, it did look slightly better. Though I wonder if that's due to my viewing it on a 24" monitor vs. a massive IMAX screen.

You don't own the blu-ray? It's way better than the Digital copy!

Oh I do. Two copies ;) I haven't had a chance to watch it yet is all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Oct 24, 2015, 06:54:10 PM
I'm such a lurker lol. On here all the time but rarely post but I feel so conflicted by this film and I've never been so "on the fence" about something. Lots of things I like and lots of things I don't. And when I see arguments for and against those points I can understand both reasons why. Hell, it could have been so much worse. I'm still a massive fan of the series and brought the steel book case version, and I am entertained watching it. I've always loved dinosaurs. Couple of things I'm set on though is that the rex doesn't look like, or look as good as Speilbergs orignal rex, and imo hasn't looked quite as real since the first film (although still good). At least the other films had animatronics of it. And it's just damn stupid that Claire ran from her in heels, when the jeep could barely outrun her in JP. Otherwise though, looking forward to watching it again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Oct 24, 2015, 07:16:44 PM
To be fair, the rex is a geriatric, even assuming that captivity allowed longer-than-usual lifespan. In the real world, no Tyrannosaurus is known to have lived more than a decade after reaching full size, and this one's been ~8 tonnes for at least 22 years. You wouldn't expect her to run as fast as she did in her prime.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Oct 24, 2015, 10:39:36 PM
Yeah that is a fair point. Forgot to mention I would have loved to see more of the restricted area or had some "wild" dinos from the original park still there.

On the subject of the rex, what do you think happened to all the Brachiosaurus from JP?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Oct 24, 2015, 11:02:37 PM
They should still be there - sauropods are known to live past 40, making them the longest-lived dinosaurs that we know of. Rexy might have made a pass at them if she was feeling brave, but you'd think she'd have munched through the Parasaurolophus, Triceratops, tardy Gallimimus and excess goats first. Or they could have gotten sick, though the DX disease hasn't been introduced in the films.

I remember people mentioning they heard Brachiosaurus calls at a couple of points in Jurassic World, but it's not in any of the documentation, so shouldn't be on public display.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Oct 25, 2015, 01:04:09 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Oct 24, 2015, 07:16:44 PM
To be fair, the rex is a geriatric, even assuming that captivity allowed longer-than-usual lifespan. In the real world, no Tyrannosaurus is known to have lived more than a decade after reaching full size, and this one's been ~8 tonnes for at least 22 years. You wouldn't expect her to run as fast as she did in her prime.

There were just little details that made it feel off to me, the quivering connecting tissue in the corner of the mouth for instance, the I rex also had this so it wasn't an age thing but an effect they elected to go with. The original rex felt very solid and powerful, this one had a head wobble as it walked, and it was cross eyed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 25, 2015, 08:07:56 PM
Show me where it was cross-eyed. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Oct 26, 2015, 12:20:50 PM
Oh and the other dinos on the website?! What a tease. Just a glimpse at the other carnivores or even a deleted scene would have been nice.

And I do think Rex's eyes were a bit too big.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 26, 2015, 01:24:51 PM
Looked okay to me.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CR5m-0eUAAAfq0C.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Taxemic on Oct 26, 2015, 10:32:30 PM
Could you get a side shot comparison of Rex from JP?

Been watching your YouTube vids lately. Cool stuff.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 27, 2015, 12:51:18 AM
Quote from: Taxemic on Oct 26, 2015, 12:20:50 PM
Oh and the other dinos on the website?! What a tease. Just a glimpse at the other carnivores or even a deleted scene would have been nice.

It's been like that since JP 1. We only see a limited number for both story and budgetary reasons.

EDIT: The silliest review of Jurassic World I've read yet.

QuoteNot sure which is more artificial: the needlessly-CGI crow of the opening scene, or the milquetoast middle class white family dynamic it immediately gives way to. We have reached peak Hollywood decadence; this is a blockbuster that foregrounds its own complete worthlessness as the central theme (Indominus Rex vs. the classic T-Rex, a masochistic showdown between the original film and this contrived sequel). The casual sexism is relentless: scene after scene after scene of Bryce Dallas-Howard being questioned, mocked, sexually harassed or openly disrespected by her "down to earth" male subordinates for being uptight and focused on her incredibly demanding job, which the film sees fit to make her a failure at anyway--before reducing her to running around in a damp, low-cut top and heels, and then killing off her pretty female assistant in one of the most bizarrely over-elaborate and pointlessly cruel death scenes in some time; meanwhile, her obnoxious emo nephew is tragically missing the wonder and grandeur of computer generated, scientifically-inaccurate dinosaurs because he's too busy looking at dumb, boring girls.

Enter Chris Pratt, a six year old boy's idea of a cool hero (to fit in with a six year old boy's idea of gender roles and storytelling, to match the rest of the film), who gets to excuse the film's flat, artlessly expository dialogue with wisecracks like "Do you hear yourself when you talk?", before snatching all authority from Howard because he's a "badass" who's too manly to wash his clothes, and is a self-described "alpha" in charge of female raptor "betas" (the Red Pill terminology the film employs is doubtlessly unintentional, but also pathetically apt, considering it almost plays like a militant corrective to Mad Max: Fury Road).

The effects and cinematography are ugly and garish, the fanbait is blatant, the sentiment is absurdly cornball (three cheers for dinosaur solidarity), the characters all follow preprogrammed "arcs" that are excruciating to sit through due to their telegraphed obviousness, and the counterfeit John Williams score just makes one wish for the real thing. Two long hours of shitty rehash; at least Jurassic Park III had the basic decency to restrain its own awfulness to a comparably easy 90 minutes.

3/10
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: xeno-kaname on Oct 27, 2015, 02:14:41 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 27, 2015, 12:51:18 AM
Quote from: Taxemic on Oct 26, 2015, 12:20:50 PM
Oh and the other dinos on the website?! What a tease. Just a glimpse at the other carnivores or even a deleted scene would have been nice.

It's been like that since JP 1. We only see a limited number for both story and budgetary reasons.

EDIT: The silliest review of Jurassic World I've read yet.

QuoteNot sure which is more artificial: the needlessly-CGI crow of the opening scene, or the milquetoast middle class white family dynamic it immediately gives way to. We have reached peak Hollywood decadence; this is a blockbuster that foregrounds its own complete worthlessness as the central theme (Indominus Rex vs. the classic T-Rex, a masochistic showdown between the original film and this contrived sequel). The casual sexism is relentless: scene after scene after scene of Bryce Dallas-Howard being questioned, mocked, sexually harassed or openly disrespected by her "down to earth" male subordinates for being uptight and focused on her incredibly demanding job, which the film sees fit to make her a failure at anyway--before reducing her to running around in a damp, low-cut top and heels, and then killing off her pretty female assistant in one of the most bizarrely over-elaborate and pointlessly cruel death scenes in some time; meanwhile, her obnoxious emo nephew is tragically missing the wonder and grandeur of computer generated, scientifically-inaccurate dinosaurs because he's too busy looking at dumb, boring girls.

Enter Chris Pratt, a six year old boy's idea of a cool hero (to fit in with a six year old boy's idea of gender roles and storytelling, to match the rest of the film), who gets to excuse the film's flat, artlessly expository dialogue with wisecracks like "Do you hear yourself when you talk?", before snatching all authority from Howard because he's a "badass" who's too manly to wash his clothes, and is a self-described "alpha" in charge of female raptor "betas" (the Red Pill terminology the film employs is doubtlessly unintentional, but also pathetically apt, considering it almost plays like a militant corrective to Mad Max: Fury Road).

The effects and cinematography are ugly and garish, the fanbait is blatant, the sentiment is absurdly cornball (three cheers for dinosaur solidarity), the characters all follow preprogrammed "arcs" that are excruciating to sit through due to their telegraphed obviousness, and the counterfeit John Williams score just makes one wish for the real thing. Two long hours of shitty rehash; at least Jurassic Park III had the basic decency to restrain its own awfulness to a comparably easy 90 minutes.

3/10

Is that Hubbs? :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Oct 27, 2015, 02:17:11 AM
Maybe his progressive twin.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Nov 01, 2015, 08:39:34 PM
How are the deleted scenes btw? No spoilers please. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Nov 03, 2015, 09:11:45 AM
Nothing really of note. There was that silly scene with Bryce and the poop that I'm thankful was removed. But nothing that was interesting.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Nov 03, 2015, 01:41:07 PM
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Nov 03, 2015, 09:11:45 AM
Nothing really of note. There was that silly scene with Bryce and the poop that I'm thankful was removed. But nothing that was interesting.

Was that the only scene? What more scenes are there? In spoiler tags?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Nov 03, 2015, 01:44:17 PM
http://www.jurassicworlduniverse.com/jurassic-world/deleted-scenes/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Nov 03, 2015, 01:50:38 PM
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Nov 03, 2015, 01:44:17 PM
http://www.jurassicworlduniverse.com/jurassic-world/deleted-scenes/

Well... indeed nothing interesting :-/ Thanks though!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Nov 04, 2015, 01:58:28 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Oct 27, 2015, 02:17:11 AM
Maybe his progressive twin.
I'm in literal tears reading this
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 04, 2015, 05:04:39 PM
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Nov 03, 2015, 09:11:45 AM
Nothing really of note. There was that silly scene with Bryce and the poop that I'm thankful was removed. But nothing that was interesting.

Did you hear about the stink (no pun intended) it raised? http://io9.com/thank-god-jurassic-world-cut-this-shit-filled-scene-1737774597

A quote from Brian Switek, one of the advisors on the film: (https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi86.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk93%2FDoomRulz_316%2Fquote_zpsbvvp4zi3.png&hash=dbff347b798f5d88e1c7bdf732d72ecb24c51459)

This is why we can't have nice things.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bjørn Half-hand on Nov 04, 2015, 09:39:18 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 04, 2015, 05:04:39 PM
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Nov 03, 2015, 09:11:45 AM
Nothing really of note. There was that silly scene with Bryce and the poop that I'm thankful was removed. But nothing that was interesting.

Did you hear about the stink (no pun intended) it raised? http://io9.com/thank-god-jurassic-world-cut-this-shit-filled-scene-1737774597

A quote from Brian Switek, one of the advisors on the film: http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k93/DoomRulz_316/quote_zpsbvvp4zi3.png

This is why we can't have nice things.

What does that guy mean by ''male gaze''? Are men not allowed to even look at women these days?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 04, 2015, 10:21:03 PM
If the stare rape turns out to be real, then yes :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 05, 2015, 08:21:50 AM
So funny to see people complaining about deleted scenes which they didn't like.

I think there would be more of an outcry if the scenes turned out to be crucial to the actual film.

They'd be like: "Why was this cut?! Typical hollywood always cutting out the good stuff."

:laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Nov 05, 2015, 08:41:02 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 05, 2015, 08:21:50 AMSo funny to see people complaining about deleted scenes which they didn't like.

I think there would be more of an outcry if the scenes turned out to be crucial to the actual film.

Exactly. Deleted scenes are usually deleted for a reason, and 95% of the time would've added nothing to the film.

It's far more frustrating when you come across something good amongst the deleted scenes that really should've been left in the film. Stuff like that makes me I had access to an editing studio and the original film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Nov 05, 2015, 09:26:07 AM
Agreed. I thought the scene was absolutely terrible so I'm glad it's gone.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 06, 2015, 06:48:06 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 05, 2015, 08:21:50 AM
So funny to see people complaining about deleted scenes which they didn't like.

I think there would be more of an outcry if the scenes turned out to be crucial to the actual film.

They'd be like: "Why was this cut?! Typical hollywood always cutting out the good stuff."

:laugh:

I wish there was more. Hard to believe a film this big only had one scene.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on Nov 06, 2015, 08:31:10 AM
There was so much crap that should have ended up on the cutting room floor.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 06, 2015, 08:38:05 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 06, 2015, 06:48:06 AM
Hard to believe a film this big only had one scene.

One scene?

In 2013 I made a video 'The 10 Rules of Jurassic Park' lets see how JW faired against this silly list.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQeO3tA5xSU
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 06, 2015, 11:20:15 PM
Quote from: SiL on Nov 06, 2015, 08:31:10 AM
There was so much crap that should have ended up on the cutting room floor.

Such as?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Nov 07, 2015, 01:27:31 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 05, 2015, 08:21:50 AM
So funny to see people complaining about deleted scenes which they didn't like.

I think there would be more of an outcry if the scenes turned out to be crucial to the actual film.

They'd be like: "Why was this cut?! Typical hollywood always cutting out the good stuff."

:laugh:
Look at the scenes cut from films to shave off time. Some good context scenes are lost.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 07, 2015, 02:49:44 AM
Quote from: Gate on Nov 07, 2015, 01:27:31 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Nov 05, 2015, 08:21:50 AM
So funny to see people complaining about deleted scenes which they didn't like.

I think there would be more of an outcry if the scenes turned out to be crucial to the actual film.

They'd be like: "Why was this cut?! Typical hollywood always cutting out the good stuff."

:laugh:
Look at the scenes cut from films to shave off time. Some good context scenes are lost.

Kind of like how a good number of the deleted scenes from Prometheus would have fixed some of its issues.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 07, 2015, 06:32:19 AM
Hack into Jurassic World's park systems.

http://www.masraniglobal.com/terminal/desktop.html
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 07, 2015, 04:20:19 PM
What's the password? I tried "please" :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 07, 2015, 04:53:00 PM
It's easy. :-*
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Nov 07, 2015, 05:30:00 PM
white rabbit object - incorrect password
whte_rbt.obj - incorrect password
mr goodbytes - incorrect password
magic word - incorrect password

???


:edit:
answer
It's indominus.
[close]
Apparently I was trying to be too clever.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 07, 2015, 10:53:50 PM
Spoiler
We chose Indominus because it meant kids could get in to. ;)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Nov 07, 2015, 11:10:52 PM
Yeah, on second thoughts, that was probably for the best!
Spoiler
This stuff's really good, can I ask who came up with the timeline details? Specifically the timeframe for Masrani and Ingen's respective Nublar operations, the inclusion of Site B in the JW setup, and Wu's hybrids.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 08, 2015, 02:32:06 AM
Spoiler
Myself and Tim wrote everything.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 10, 2015, 04:40:43 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73dPzpQ-qsU
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 11, 2015, 03:22:04 AM
I'm not even going to watch it. 8)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Af-yOQC0ZrE
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 12, 2015, 05:27:29 PM
I left a pretty scathing list of everything they got wrong. I don't think Jeremy was paying attention when he watched JW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Scree on Nov 14, 2015, 07:41:09 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 10, 2015, 04:40:43 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73dPzpQ-qsU
I didn't see the movie but this was still fun to watch. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Nov 14, 2015, 05:03:46 PM
Oh no, the perfect Cinema Sins audience member. Someone who hash't watched the film :laugh:

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: stephen on Nov 16, 2015, 02:56:29 AM
god - a lot of the so called "sins" cinema sins comes up with regarding a lot of movies aren't really sins at all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 16, 2015, 09:53:06 PM
They're not really trying much these days. While I understand the whole point of CinemaSins is to nitpick silly things, a lot of sins videos contain sins that are explained in the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: stephen on Nov 17, 2015, 02:31:47 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Nov 16, 2015, 09:53:06 PM
They're not really trying much these days. While I understand the whole point of CinemaSins is to nitpick silly things, a lot of sins videos contain sins that are explained in the film.

Exactly.

one issue among many.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 03, 2016, 06:52:16 AM
http://www.scified.com/jurassicworld/colin-trevorrow-teases-possible-t-rex-vs-spinosaurus-re-match-in-jurassic-world-2

The symbolic gesture in JW, IMO, was good enough.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 03, 2016, 10:18:24 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 03, 2016, 06:52:16 AM
The symbolic gesture in JW, IMO, was good enough.

I think that is what he is talking about.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jan 03, 2016, 11:00:17 AM
The symbolic gesture was more than good enough. The only way it could be superior is if those are the bones from the JP3 spinosaurus. In any case I'd prefer a sequel try something different from the now four movies and add a few new dinos. Of course it seems to be headed into the weaponized beast phase... though at the same time nothing became of that lost can full of dino-dna.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 03, 2016, 11:59:33 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jan 03, 2016, 11:00:17 AM
...though at the same time nothing became of that lost can full of dino-dna.

Why is the can important?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jan 03, 2016, 12:30:35 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 03, 2016, 11:59:33 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jan 03, 2016, 11:00:17 AM
...though at the same time nothing became of that lost can full of dino-dna.

Why is the can important?
All I mean is that since the can never become a plot device for a sequel to JP; that maybe all the talk about using dinos as soldiers in JW may also just go away and we'd get a more clever story for JW2. I'm not saying a movie featuring dinosaurs as living weapons is necessarily a bad thing but well... I'd like something new to be the major plot of the next movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 04, 2016, 06:27:25 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jan 03, 2016, 11:00:17 AM
The symbolic gesture was more than good enough. The only way it could be superior is if those are the bones from the JP3 spinosaurus. In any case I'd prefer a sequel try something different from the now four movies and add a few new dinos. Of course it seems to be headed into the weaponized beast phase... though at the same time nothing became of that lost can full of dino-dna.

I'm very concerned that the sequel will suck a lot. If they really go with this "militarized dinosaurs" gimmick, it's going to be very stupid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jan 04, 2016, 07:19:09 PM
It's not like JW was brimming with smartness, nor that it gave two nineteenths of a shit about portraying convincing dinosaurs. If the director's as good with action as Colin Trevorrow, I'd be surprised if I enjoy the sequel any less.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 04, 2016, 11:31:59 PM
There has to be a limit. Jurassic always has some roots in science. This isn't Dino Riders.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jan 05, 2016, 02:33:13 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 04, 2016, 06:27:25 PM
I'm very concerned that the sequel will suck a lot. If they really go with this "militarized dinosaurs" gimmick, it's going to be very stupid.
I agree, unfortunately.
Spoiler
My hopes are that Dr. Wu does the opposite of what Hammond and Mas. envisioned and makes the new dinosaurs the way they would have been millions of years ago.
Spoiler
Feathered.
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Jan 05, 2016, 02:36:51 AM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Jan 05, 2016, 02:33:13 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 04, 2016, 06:27:25 PM
I'm very concerned that the sequel will suck a lot. If they really go with this "militarized dinosaurs" gimmick, it's going to be very stupid.
I agree, unfortunately.
Spoiler
My hopes are that Dr. Wu does the opposite of what Hammond and Mas. envisioned and makes the new dinosaurs the way they would have been millions of years ago.
Spoiler
Feathered.
[close]
[close]
Spoiler
Not just feathered...
Spoiler
but accurate as well.
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 05, 2016, 02:38:08 AM
^That. There's much more to making the dinosaurs scientifically-accurate beyond adding feathers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jan 05, 2016, 03:07:58 AM
That's what I was aiming for, of course. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 05, 2016, 01:06:34 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 04, 2016, 06:27:25 PM
If they really go with this "militarized dinosaurs" gimmick, it's going to be very stupid.

Jurassic World already covered militarised dinosaurs and people trying to use them for combat.

It just did it in a very Jurassic Park way.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jan 06, 2016, 01:01:59 AM
Oh sure, when Weyland Yutani does it nobody cares but when Ingen does it...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jan 06, 2016, 02:46:33 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jan 06, 2016, 01:01:59 AM
Oh sure, when Weyland Yutani does it nobody cares but when Ingen does it...
Oh snap... I think.  ::)

Then again no one liked Alien Resurrection. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Alien Predator on Jan 06, 2016, 03:22:05 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jan 06, 2016, 02:46:33 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jan 06, 2016, 01:01:59 AM
Oh sure, when Weyland Yutani does it nobody cares but when Ingen does it...
Oh snap... I think.  ::)

Then again no one liked Alien Resurrection. :P

Weyland-Yutani wasn't in Alien Resurrection.

And I liked the film.  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jan 06, 2016, 04:52:58 AM
Quote from: Guan Thwei 1992 on Jan 06, 2016, 03:22:05 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jan 06, 2016, 02:46:33 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jan 06, 2016, 01:01:59 AM
Oh sure, when Weyland Yutani does it nobody cares but when Ingen does it...
Oh snap... I think.  ::)

Then again no one liked Alien Resurrection. :P

Weyland-Yutani wasn't in Alien Resurrection.

And I liked the film.  :P
Yea thought as much, bought out by walmart in the cut scene. That wasn't like, that was residual memories from the cloning process. You just have warm feelings towards the alien parts.:P

Still here's to the day Jurassic Park meets Alien.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 06, 2016, 08:11:42 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jan 06, 2016, 04:52:58 AM
Still here's to the day Jurassic Park meets Alien.

This is like if JP and Alien had a baby...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.moviepostershop.com%2Fsphere-movie-poster-1998-1020211002.jpg&hash=25d18dc61c697b1772ba104360551a89abd585b5)

(In terms of film-making style, atmosphere and characters.)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jan 06, 2016, 08:30:43 AM
I keep meaning to watch that (or buy the book) but its never on NetFlix or Prime when I check.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jan 06, 2016, 08:46:04 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 06, 2016, 08:11:42 AM(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.moviepostershop.com%2Fsphere-movie-poster-1998-1020211002.jpg&hash=25d18dc61c697b1772ba104360551a89abd585b5)

Love that film, terrible ending though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jan 06, 2016, 09:33:29 AM
Yea that pretty much sums up sphere.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 06, 2016, 09:44:12 AM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Jan 06, 2016, 08:46:04 AM
Love that film, terrible ending though.

Whats wrong with the ending? :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jan 06, 2016, 09:46:07 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 06, 2016, 09:44:12 AM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Jan 06, 2016, 08:46:04 AM
Love that film, terrible ending though.

Whats wrong with the ending? :-\
Damn it's been so long since I watched the film but the ending I remember being an out right downer. Really should watch it again.

Oh that's right...
Spoiler
they have their minds wiped. I mean it made sense but at the same time made the movie abruptly pointless, depending on how you look at things.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Jan 06, 2016, 10:09:44 AM
If JP and alien had a baby... It would be aliens, without marines.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jan 06, 2016, 10:22:36 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 06, 2016, 09:44:12 AMWhats wrong with the ending? :-\

Spoiler
I realise there wasn't much else they could do, but it was such an anti-climax. It was basically the writers saying "and then they woke up and it was all a dream".
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 06, 2016, 04:20:33 PM
The book was better. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jan 06, 2016, 04:22:07 PM
Isn't that generally the case?  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 06, 2016, 06:55:38 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 06, 2016, 09:44:12 AM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Jan 06, 2016, 08:46:04 AM
Love that film, terrible ending though.

Whats wrong with the ending? :-\

Hey dude. Jurassic Collectables and Jurassic June have agreed to a fan stream of the film. Interested?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 07, 2016, 05:25:42 AM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Jan 06, 2016, 10:22:36 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 06, 2016, 09:44:12 AMWhats wrong with the ending? :-\

Spoiler
It was basically the writers saying "and then they woke up and it was all a dream".
[close]

Spoiler
They used the power to forget. If it was like a dream they'd remember something, but they don't recall anything. Absolutely nothing like a "and then they woke up and it was all a dream" ending.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jan 07, 2016, 08:39:31 AM
It still amounts to the same thing. A follow-on could resolve that in some way, of course. They remember, blah, blah. But without that, it still has the same effect as "it was all a dream."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jan 07, 2016, 08:45:53 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 07, 2016, 05:25:42 AM
Spoiler
They used the power to forget. If it was like a dream they'd remember something, but they don't recall anything. Absolutely nothing like a "and then they woke up and it was all a dream" ending.
[close]

I was talking about the overall concept. It renders everything that happened in the rest of the film totally pointless.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 07, 2016, 08:57:12 AM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Jan 07, 2016, 08:45:53 AM
I was talking about the overall concept. It renders everything that happened in the rest of the film totally pointless.

Not at all.

Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Jan 07, 2016, 08:39:31 AM
A follow-on could resolve that in some way, of course. They remember, blah, blah.

But that would ruin the point the film is making.

Spoiler
The characters are fixing the "unknown event" time travel paradox which mankind created when they entered the blackhole.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jan 07, 2016, 09:02:17 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 07, 2016, 08:57:12 AM
But that would ruin the point the film is making.

Spoiler
The characters are fixing the "unknown event" time travel paradox which mankind created when they entered the blackhole.
[close]

Sorry, I haven't actually seen the film. I'm just speaking in general terms. I'll shut up now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 07, 2016, 10:17:14 AM
Haha sorry man, you sounded like a man in the know :laugh:

Highly recommend the movie for those who haven't seen it. As I mentioned its like JP and Alien had a baby.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jan 07, 2016, 01:02:21 PM
Sphere - the novel - is extraordinary sci-fi.

The film is so poorly made it's not even worth a mention.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 07, 2016, 01:18:48 PM
Quote from: Omegamorph on Jan 07, 2016, 01:02:21 PM
The film is so poorly made it's not even worth a mention.

Waaaa?! Dude its matured so well.

Underrated fo sho.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on Jan 07, 2016, 01:29:24 PM
The book is phenomenal, the film not so much... Very uneven in tone.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jan 07, 2016, 02:20:53 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 07, 2016, 08:57:12 AMNot at all.

I thought it was. And hugely disappointing. The whole "we can't possibly survive this" thing built up so much tension and then they just... forget.

Quote from: Tangakkai on Jan 07, 2016, 01:29:24 PMThe book is phenomenal, the film not so much... Very uneven in tone.

The film is good but even as someone who hasn't read the book I can image that would be superior. One I've been meaning to read for a while. I think I've just been a bit put off by how uneven Crichton can be.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jan 07, 2016, 03:51:37 PM
It's one of his better ones. I can't remember if I've seen the film, but the book's well worth reading.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jan 07, 2016, 09:40:13 PM
Like many things the novel is always better because it has the benefit of not being bounded down by an arbitrary run time. Sphere is a decent movie. It's definitely watchable.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jan 08, 2016, 01:48:29 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kOvYQW0AJM
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 08, 2016, 10:23:30 AM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Jan 07, 2016, 02:20:53 PM
The whole "we can't possibly survive this" thing built up so much tension and then they just... forget.

What are you talking about?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jan 08, 2016, 10:27:40 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 08, 2016, 10:23:30 AMWhat are you talking about?

Sphere. Samuel L. Jackson talks about how they can't possibly live to tell anyone what the deal is, because in the future the ship's crew don't know what's happening. It builds up tension because you think they're all going to die, then in the end all they do is choose not to remember anything. It's such an anti-climax.

Not much else they could do in the circumstances, but I still think it's a naff ending.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 08, 2016, 05:23:28 PM
I don't recall any of that happening. Ship's crew? Samuel L. Jackson? When did this happen?

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: 426Buddy on Jan 08, 2016, 07:53:36 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 08, 2016, 05:23:28 PM
I don't recall any of that happening. Ship's crew? Samuel L. Jackson? When did this happen?

They're talking about the movie Sphere, it's all explained at the end of the movie when they decide to forget.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jan 08, 2016, 08:34:02 PM
Quote from: 420Buddy on Jan 08, 2016, 07:53:36 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 08, 2016, 05:23:28 PM
I don't recall any of that happening. Ship's crew? Samuel L. Jackson? When did this happen?

They're talking about the movie Sphere, it's all explained at the end of the movie when they decide to forget.
lol wasn't Sam Jackson in Jurassic Park... haha talk about the confusion between movies.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 09, 2016, 07:37:06 AM
Quote from: 420Buddy on Jan 08, 2016, 07:53:36 PM
They're talking about the movie Sphere, it's all explained at the end of the movie when they decide to forget.

Unfortunately I don't recall this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jan 09, 2016, 10:57:35 AM
All this sphere talk is making me think of a T-Rex with tentacles...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jan 09, 2016, 04:55:27 PM
You have no recollection of someone forgetting something.


Someone kill me before I make more puns about this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 09, 2016, 05:35:24 PM
Quote from: Gate on Jan 09, 2016, 04:55:27 PM
You have no recollection of someone forgetting something.


Someone kill me before I make more puns about this.

You see, I've got this condition...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 09, 2016, 05:59:49 PM
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dJolYw8tnk
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
...to forget.
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jan 09, 2016, 11:16:22 PM
The power to cheat memories is a power that only one has achieved and you know what; Superman is never around when you really need him.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jan 10, 2016, 04:10:28 AM
"We're not ready."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jan 10, 2016, 05:39:14 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jan 10, 2016, 04:10:28 AM
"We're not ready."
You're never ready. You go when you're ready enough. So pucker up.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2hXpc4n9cc
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jan 11, 2016, 08:39:31 AM
Man, I love me some Robot Chicken. Such a demented show.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2016, 03:33:10 AM
What do you think of this as a sequel idea.

Spoiler
Scientists have learned that the theme park idea just doesn't work. The dinosaurs, one way or another, escape and the whole thing falls apart. They decide instead to reintroduce dinosaurs into the wild, on the mainland, with modern animals. Their rationale is that due to the balance that ecosystems have lost thanks to human activity (namely hunting and poaching), dinosaurs could help restore various ecosystems around the world. The science has shown that when large animals go extinct in particular, it can affect the way plants grow (for example). The only problem of course is that this plan ultimately backfires because dinosaurs were not meant to co-exist with modern animals and they leave a considerably larger ecological footprint than any animal alive today. This becomes even more of a problem when hunters decide they want to go for the ultimate challenge and start targeting what few dinosaurs are in the wild and nearly hunt them all to death.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jan 14, 2016, 03:47:19 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2016, 03:33:10 AM
What do you think of this as a sequel idea.

Spoiler
Scientists have learned that the theme park idea just doesn't work. The dinosaurs, one way or another, escape and the whole thing falls apart. They decide instead to reintroduce dinosaurs into the wild, on the mainland, with modern animals. Their rationale is that due to the balance that ecosystems have lost thanks to human activity (namely hunting and poaching), dinosaurs could help restore various ecosystems around the world. The science has shown that when large animals go extinct in particular, it can affect the way plants grow (for example). The only problem of course is that this plan ultimately backfires because dinosaurs were not meant to co-exist with modern animals and they leave a considerably larger ecological footprint than any animal alive today. This becomes even more of a problem when hunters decide they want to go for the ultimate challenge and start targeting what few dinosaurs are in the wild and nearly hunt them all to death.
[close]
Spoiler
I think it could work, however the reason the dinosaurs are released has to make more sense. It makes no sense to introduce a gigantic dead species to any ecosystem. Plus if they can bring dinos back, then why not just bring modern extinct large creatures back to fix the ecosystem.

Perhaps a better way would be to have them at a lost about what to do with all of the dinos and have them sold to rich nut jobs; that then have them graze on their farms located throughout the globe. Of course it's a disaster and hilarity ensures.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jan 14, 2016, 03:48:36 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2016, 03:33:10 AM
What do you think of this as a sequel idea.

Spoiler
Scientists have learned that the theme park idea just doesn't work. The dinosaurs, one way or another, escape and the whole thing falls apart. They decide instead to reintroduce dinosaurs into the wild, on the mainland, with modern animals. Their rationale is that due to the balance that ecosystems have lost thanks to human activity (namely hunting and poaching), dinosaurs could help restore various ecosystems around the world. The science has shown that when large animals go extinct in particular, it can affect the way plants grow (for example). The only problem of course is that this plan ultimately backfires because dinosaurs were not meant to co-exist with modern animals and they leave a considerably larger ecological footprint than any animal alive today. This becomes even more of a problem when hunters decide they want to go for the ultimate challenge and start targeting what few dinosaurs are in the wild and nearly hunt them all to death.
[close]
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmemecrunch.com%2Fmeme%2F2PXUX%2Fhell-yeah%2Fimage.jpg&hash=a19388f6960632ab4709e5eaf27823d9546b76a0)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2016, 03:51:13 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jan 14, 2016, 03:47:19 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2016, 03:33:10 AM
What do you think of this as a sequel idea.

Spoiler
Scientists have learned that the theme park idea just doesn't work. The dinosaurs, one way or another, escape and the whole thing falls apart. They decide instead to reintroduce dinosaurs into the wild, on the mainland, with modern animals. Their rationale is that due to the balance that ecosystems have lost thanks to human activity (namely hunting and poaching), dinosaurs could help restore various ecosystems around the world. The science has shown that when large animals go extinct in particular, it can affect the way plants grow (for example). The only problem of course is that this plan ultimately backfires because dinosaurs were not meant to co-exist with modern animals and they leave a considerably larger ecological footprint than any animal alive today. This becomes even more of a problem when hunters decide they want to go for the ultimate challenge and start targeting what few dinosaurs are in the wild and nearly hunt them all to death.
[close]
Spoiler
I think it could work, however the reason the dinosaurs are released has to make more sense. It makes no sense to introduce a gigantic dead species to any ecosystem. Plus if they can bring dinos back, then why not just bring modern extinct large creatures back to fix the ecosystem.

Perhaps a better way would be to have them at a lost about what to do with all of the dinos and have them sold to rich nut jobs; that then have them graze on their farms located throughout the globe. Of course it's a disaster and hilarity ensures.
[close]

Spoiler
Simple: no one preserved their DNA because, well, no one thought to. Why would anyone have saved the genetic material of a modern animal? Plus, there's the marketability aspect. People would go nuts for the idea of seeing a sauropod in its natural habitat vs, say, an elephant.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jan 14, 2016, 06:18:09 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2016, 03:51:13 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jan 14, 2016, 03:47:19 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2016, 03:33:10 AM
What do you think of this as a sequel idea.

Spoiler
Scientists have learned that the theme park idea just doesn't work. The dinosaurs, one way or another, escape and the whole thing falls apart. They decide instead to reintroduce dinosaurs into the wild, on the mainland, with modern animals. Their rationale is that due to the balance that ecosystems have lost thanks to human activity (namely hunting and poaching), dinosaurs could help restore various ecosystems around the world. The science has shown that when large animals go extinct in particular, it can affect the way plants grow (for example). The only problem of course is that this plan ultimately backfires because dinosaurs were not meant to co-exist with modern animals and they leave a considerably larger ecological footprint than any animal alive today. This becomes even more of a problem when hunters decide they want to go for the ultimate challenge and start targeting what few dinosaurs are in the wild and nearly hunt them all to death.
[close]
Spoiler
I think it could work, however the reason the dinosaurs are released has to make more sense. It makes no sense to introduce a gigantic dead species to any ecosystem. Plus if they can bring dinos back, then why not just bring modern extinct large creatures back to fix the ecosystem.

Perhaps a better way would be to have them at a lost about what to do with all of the dinos and have them sold to rich nut jobs; that then have them graze on their farms located throughout the globe. Of course it's a disaster and hilarity ensures.
[close]

Spoiler
Simple: no one preserved their DNA because, well, no one thought to. Why would anyone have saved the genetic material of a modern animal? Plus, there's the marketability aspect. People would go nuts for the idea of seeing a sauropod in its natural habitat vs, say, an elephant.
[close]
Spoiler
If you can find dino dna; you can find any other dna you want. Talking movie logic right? The second part, people in Jurassic World  were already bored of dinos, "apparently", which is why they had to engineer more fearsome monsters. Putting them out into the wild doesn't change that. In all honesty though, something would have to be done with the dinos.

I get the idea of hunters wanting trophies and humans hunting them to extinction but the justification to set them free on the world isn't very logical. Still what to do with them... none the less they are here and they'll be people that want to take care of them. I still see selling them to outside interest as a way of integrating them into the real world more logically than letting them loose for speculative reasons. Thinking that they would help the "eco system" just sounds so Prometheus™ school of science. No offense.

The thing about the plants could be made to work. Perhaps as you say, introducing a dinosaur to a rain forest caused plants to evolve in a different manner that allow for the production of new chemicals used for defense that have medical applications. Some of that was in Jurassic park with that plant the triceratops was eating. This would be stretching it though.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Jan 14, 2016, 07:33:22 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jan 14, 2016, 06:18:09 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2016, 03:51:13 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jan 14, 2016, 03:47:19 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2016, 03:33:10 AM
What do you think of this as a sequel idea.

Spoiler
Scientists have learned that the theme park idea just doesn't work. The dinosaurs, one way or another, escape and the whole thing falls apart. They decide instead to reintroduce dinosaurs into the wild, on the mainland, with modern animals. Their rationale is that due to the balance that ecosystems have lost thanks to human activity (namely hunting and poaching), dinosaurs could help restore various ecosystems around the world. The science has shown that when large animals go extinct in particular, it can affect the way plants grow (for example). The only problem of course is that this plan ultimately backfires because dinosaurs were not meant to co-exist with modern animals and they leave a considerably larger ecological footprint than any animal alive today. This becomes even more of a problem when hunters decide they want to go for the ultimate challenge and start targeting what few dinosaurs are in the wild and nearly hunt them all to death.
[close]
Spoiler
I think it could work, however the reason the dinosaurs are released has to make more sense. It makes no sense to introduce a gigantic dead species to any ecosystem. Plus if they can bring dinos back, then why not just bring modern extinct large creatures back to fix the ecosystem.

Perhaps a better way would be to have them at a lost about what to do with all of the dinos and have them sold to rich nut jobs; that then have them graze on their farms located throughout the globe. Of course it's a disaster and hilarity ensures.
[close]

Spoiler
Simple: no one preserved their DNA because, well, no one thought to. Why would anyone have saved the genetic material of a modern animal? Plus, there's the marketability aspect. People would go nuts for the idea of seeing a sauropod in its natural habitat vs, say, an elephant.
[close]
Spoiler
If you can find dino dna; you can find any other dna you want. Talking movie logic right? The second part, people in Jurassic World  were already bored of dinos, "apparently", which is why they had to engineer more fearsome monsters. Putting them out into the wild doesn't change that. In all honesty though, something would have to be done with the dinos.

I get the idea of hunters wanting trophies and humans hunting them to extinction but the justification to set them free on the world isn't very logical. Still what to do with them... none the less they are here and they'll be people that want to take care of them. I still see selling them to outside interest as a way of integrating them into the real world more logically than letting them loose for speculative reasons. Thinking that they would help the "eco system" just sounds so Prometheus™ school of science. No offense.

The thing about the plants could be made to work. Perhaps as you say, introducing a dinosaur to a rain forest caused plants to evolve in a different manner that allow for the production of new chemicals used for defense that have medical applications. Some of that was in Jurassic park with that plant the triceratops was eating. This would be stretching it though.
[close]
Spoiler
Maybe they escape from wherever they took Wu?
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jan 14, 2016, 09:11:29 PM
Ok how about this...

Spoiler
It's not the dinos that get out but the plants. Flying dinosaurs do escape after the 3rd movie so if anything they carried what are essentially alien plant seeds to new areas. The plants themselves spread as well. Which does cause a global pandemic of sorts. To counter this some countries decide to use a biological means of control and do indeed release herbivore dinosaurs into the wild. It works well enough that soon everyone is doing it but like anything, eventually they're too many dinos and hippies. No one can come up with a solution so somebody decides to take matters into their own hands and release a few meat eaters. Of course the ones they release out of ignorance are the super intelligent militaristic killing machines. Of course now every hunter in the world wants to bag a prize and governments are more than willing to pay for a non-military solution.

yea yea it's the some more of the hippies release the big bad virus and rednecks release the big bad virus and I'm not sure if 3 years is enough time to justify this shit as the movie is suppose to happen in real time. Still I feel the biological control concept has a little more reasoning to it.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2016, 10:33:02 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jan 14, 2016, 09:11:29 PM
Ok how about this...

Spoiler
It's not the dinos that get out but the plants. Flying dinosaurs do escape after the 3rd movie so if anything they carried what are essentially alien plant seeds to new areas. The plants themselves spread as well. Which does cause a global pandemic of sorts. To counter this some countries decide to use a biological means of control and do indeed release herbivore dinosaurs into the wild. It works well enough that soon everyone is doing it but like anything, eventually they're too many dinos and hippies. No one can come up with a solution so somebody decides to take matters into their own hands and release a few meat eaters. Of course the ones they release out of ignorance are the super intelligent militaristic killing machines. Of course now every hunter in the world wants to bag a prize and governments are more than willing to pay for a non-military solution.

yea yea it's the some more of the hippies release the big bad virus and rednecks release the big bad virus and I'm not sure if 3 years is enough time to justify this shit as the movie is suppose to happen in real time. Still I feel the biological control concept has a little more reasoning to it.
[close]

I hate to be pedantic but...pterosaurs :P

In you scenario, there's no reason why the herbivorous dinosaurs couldn't just be killed by conventional means. It would be more economical than creating and releasing theropods. Also, where did hippies come from?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jan 14, 2016, 11:30:05 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2016, 10:33:02 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jan 14, 2016, 09:11:29 PM
Ok how about this...

Spoiler
It's not the dinos that get out but the plants. Flying dinosaurs do escape after the 3rd movie so if anything they carried what are essentially alien plant seeds to new areas. The plants themselves spread as well. Which does cause a global pandemic of sorts. To counter this some countries decide to use a biological means of control and do indeed release herbivore dinosaurs into the wild. It works well enough that soon everyone is doing it but like anything, eventually they're too many dinos and hippies. No one can come up with a solution so somebody decides to take matters into their own hands and release a few meat eaters. Of course the ones they release out of ignorance are the super intelligent militaristic killing machines. Of course now every hunter in the world wants to bag a prize and governments are more than willing to pay for a non-military solution.

yea yea it's the some more of the hippies release the big bad virus and rednecks release the big bad virus and I'm not sure if 3 years is enough time to justify this shit as the movie is suppose to happen in real time. Still I feel the biological control concept has a little more reasoning to it.
[close]

I hate to be pedantic but...pterosaurs :P

In you scenario, there's no reason why the herbivorous dinosaurs couldn't just be killed by conventional means. It would be more economical than creating and releasing theropods. Also, where did hippies come from?
First I expected for you to be pedantic and second the hippies are the people who want to save the dinosaurs which is why no one can come to an understanding of what to do about them. You know peta, animal rights activists, human societies, wealthy socialites, hell private landowners for that matter; anyone who loves dinosaurs and think they shouldn't be killed for whatever reason. Actually strike peta, under their mandate they would ruthlessly slaughter dinosaurs, come to think about it. Simply put you'd have people for and against it which would hamper any action that is to be taken. Dinosaurs lives matter... ugh can't believe I just used that horrible pun. It would create a delay long enough to let someone do something rather radish. Like releasing predatory dinosaurs as a solution to the crisis. For example a wealthy landowner tired of seeing his farm corps ravaged by rampaging triceratops. Eh, cook up any scenario but that's where I'm coming from.

Oh and come to think about it, once the "theropods" are out, then the government would have utmost reason to use conventional means of eradication. Of course in this scenario the dinosaurs catch everyone off guard with their enhance abilities and intelligence. However I do not want a nuke it from orbit ending. It should be more nuance than that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2016, 11:55:54 PM
Maybe there's a way to combine my idea with yours, like,

Spoiler
The pterosaurs that escaped Isla Sorna in JP3 spread the seeds, as you mentioned. The seeds cause some mayhem in modern ecosystems; let's say the African Savannah. I'm using that because Africa has the ideal climate for a Jurassic Park film and the AS is known for lots of wildlife. Now, modern animals are unable to consume these new foreign plants because they grew in isolation from the mainland and consequently, only the dinosaurs can stomach them. So, cue the release of herbivores on a trial basis so to speak to "clean up". This is where the balance aspect of my story would come into play. The dinosaurs are restoring order to the ecosystem but eventually, when the clean up is finished and they start feeding on regular plants, they start to spread all over the place and cause more harm than good. Now your idea comes up in that the world governments or whomever else cannot send in extermination squads because #dinolivesmatter. So theropods are created to clean up yet again which then totally spirals out of control and f**ks up everything. The hunters and poachers could be a simple side story.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jan 15, 2016, 12:14:56 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Jan 14, 2016, 11:55:54 PM
Maybe there's a way to combine my idea with yours, like,

Spoiler
The pterosaurs that escaped Isla Sorna in JP3 spread the seeds, as you mentioned. The seeds cause some mayhem in modern ecosystems; let's say the African Savannah. I'm using that because Africa has the ideal climate for a Jurassic Park film and the AS is known for lots of wildlife. Now, modern animals are unable to consume these new foreign plants because they grew in isolation from the mainland and consequently, only the dinosaurs can stomach them. So, cue the release of herbivores on a trial basis so to speak to "clean up". This is where the balance aspect of my story would come into play. The dinosaurs are restoring order to the ecosystem but eventually, when the clean up is finished and they start feeding on regular plants, they start to spread all over the place and cause more harm than good. Now your idea comes up in that the world governments or whomever else cannot send in extermination squads because #dinolivesmatter. So theropods are created to clean up yet again which then totally spirals out of control and f**ks up everything. The hunters and poachers could be a simple side story.
[close]
Spoiler
Yea that would help tighten up the story and most of all it gives a logical reason for introducing an alien species into the wild and a consequence for doing so that would lead to man making another bad decision. That's the start of a plausible movie.

Hunters and poaching is definitely going to have a place in the story. It's inevitable in such an environment. To over use them would harken to JP2 and mercenaries were used in JW... meaning that we could pull them into the sequel. In any case you need to work out the big bad. :P
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jan 28, 2016, 01:19:40 PM
http://www.comingsoon.net/movies/news/651239-bryce-dallas-howard-teases-her-characters-return-in-jurassic-world-sequel#/slide/1
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 05, 2016, 02:44:41 PM
New vlog...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJ6uQ-Q_o08
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Feb 06, 2016, 07:14:40 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5a7JKjVB8rs

https://vimeo.com/149407025
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 08, 2016, 02:17:27 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Feb 06, 2016, 07:14:40 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5a7JKjVB8rs

https://vimeo.com/149407025

I love CGI.

It's a fascinating tool.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Born Of Cold Light on Feb 10, 2016, 03:22:02 AM
Would anyone else here like to see a fight between an indominus and a vastatosaurus?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.ifcdn.com%2Fimages%2F8e30a46c5111e8859b9982fa231e536fe1c61500e8d95a4642835cb5d2726af4_1.jpg&hash=2419659220d2aa6a5c04665b5259a90bdad27c1d)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 11, 2016, 07:19:57 PM
Indominus wouldn't stand a chance.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Feb 11, 2016, 10:42:28 PM
I dunno, a total of three V. rexes had trouble with a single overgrown monkey.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Feb 11, 2016, 11:20:10 PM
IIRC the V.rex should basically be bigger than the Indominus, so it'd win by size advantage alone.

If I'm wrong and they're at the same size, I think it'd depend on the V.rex's stamina. An old, battered T.rex put up a good fight with the Indominus -- I imagine something like that at its prime (even the bull male from The Lost World) would fare out better.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Astronoë on Feb 13, 2016, 09:55:50 PM
I dearly wanted to buy a book along the lines something like "Jurassic World: The Art of the film" except I couldn't because there never was one..which is very odd these days for major movies not to come out with an art book...at least that I know of, I have yet to find one from this movie..

I'm figuring they got to so much concept art n ideas they are going to use for the next movie so it would be spoilers if they released an art book?..

..at least there is some concept art online..but I want a freaking book! :'(

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hohARq5_JOQ

Instead all we got were some kids books...
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fecx.images-amazon.com%2Fimages%2FI%2F61P0mYNjggL._SY435_BO1%2C204%2C203%2C200_.jpg&hash=f08ef40ad09969868a7d23469e6e1372fd6b186d)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 15, 2016, 09:28:16 AM
Yeah an art book would have been nice. :-\

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UutbMPtdRHI
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Feb 15, 2016, 10:07:50 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Feb 15, 2016, 09:28:16 AM
Yeah an art book would have been nice. :-\

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UutbMPtdRHI

Great video mate
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 15, 2016, 10:11:48 PM
Cheers! ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bjørn Half-hand on Feb 16, 2016, 05:54:05 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Feb 15, 2016, 09:28:16 AM
Yeah an art book would have been nice. :-\

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UutbMPtdRHI

You made this vid? Really good stuff. Checked out your Youtube channel, some nostalgic stuff there, watched a bit of your Alien trilogy on the PS1 stream.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 17, 2016, 11:28:28 AM
Thanks man! It's a new channel which I'm trying to get off the ground. So thank you!

There's a lot of content planned for 2016!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bjørn Half-hand on Feb 17, 2016, 09:57:18 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Feb 17, 2016, 11:28:28 AM
Thanks man! It's a new channel which I'm trying to get off the ground. So thank you!

There's a lot of content planned for 2016!

I subscribed to your channel earlier today. Look forward to your upcoming content.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 18, 2016, 02:35:40 PM
There will be plenty of Jurassic Park, Alien and Predator content fo sho! :laugh:

Anyways, here is some very interesting items about the effects of Jurassic World.

https://vimeo.com/149407025

http://www.zbrushcentral.com/showthread.php?198673-Interview-ILM-on-Jurassic-World

I also re-uploaded my T-rex speed paint.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLrRQ9CpQds
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 22, 2016, 06:41:20 AM
Quote from: Born Of Cold Light on Feb 10, 2016, 03:22:02 AM
Would anyone else here like to see a fight between an indominus and a vastatosaurus?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.ifcdn.com%2Fimages%2F8e30a46c5111e8859b9982fa231e536fe1c61500e8d95a4642835cb5d2726af4_1.jpg&hash=2419659220d2aa6a5c04665b5259a90bdad27c1d)

Depends. Indominus has the camo ability and is definitely lighter on her feet so maybe an ambush attack? But head on, with nowhere to hide, a V.rex would crush her, literally.

I was rewatching JW recently and noticed a nice little bit of cinematography in the Indominus/Rex fight. There were two instances in which it was filmed in a single take. The first is after Rex initially lunges at Indominus up until Indominus throws her into the shack, then again, after Blue jumps onto Indominus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 27, 2016, 04:43:23 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Feb 22, 2016, 06:41:20 AM
I was rewatching JW recently and noticed a nice little bit of cinematography in the Indominus/Rex fight. There were two instances in which it was filmed in a single take. The first is after Rex initially lunges at Indominus up until Indominus throws her into the shack, then again, after Blue jumps onto Indominus.

Yeah man. When we spoke to Kevin Stitt he talked about editing the end fight. It's such a well made sequence.

Speaking of the end fight, here is my latest Jurassic artwork.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F40.media.tumblr.com%2Feb50f421c3c576a685be381cc5a3ee0e%2Ftumblr_o37t0e6MBj1rxp2lko1_1280.jpg&hash=da517bfce8ca9aa7b95fe174565b4a56a5aaaadb)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-g-zCuFzmY
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Feb 27, 2016, 05:23:28 PM
Me likey!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 04, 2016, 02:28:45 PM
Awesome work man
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 04, 2016, 09:39:17 PM
Cheers guys!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Mar 05, 2016, 05:15:33 AM
wow good job! brings me back right to that scene.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 05, 2016, 11:01:27 AM
Well done sir!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 22, 2016, 01:33:24 PM
Thanks guys!

Our podcast has a sister podcast The Lost Pod: Jurassic Cast for those who are interested...

http://thelostpod.podbean.com
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 22, 2016, 09:59:31 PM
Here is a question for everyone:

With 2017 being the 25th anni of Jurassic Park, do you expect a re-release in theaters? Perhaps with extra footage added in (PLEASSSSSSEEE!!!!) ? Same goes for the 20th anni of The Lost World?

I certainly hope so!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Mar 23, 2016, 01:31:17 AM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 22, 2016, 09:59:31 PM
Here is a question for everyone:

With 2017 being the 25th anni of Jurassic Park, do you expect a re-release in theaters? Perhaps with extra footage added in (PLEASSSSSSEEE!!!!) ? Same goes for the 20th anni of The Lost World?

I certainly hope so!

Would be awesome!  But with Jurassic world just being released last year, it might come off as a hustle


Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: predxeno on Mar 23, 2016, 04:56:52 AM
Didn't they already re-release Jurassic Park in 3D a couple of years ago?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Mar 24, 2016, 02:38:39 PM
QuoteIn a fresh report from UK based news outlet, The Sun, a source claims that the highly anticipated sequel to last summer's Jurassic World will film in the city of London next year and involve Dinosaurs roaming free, wrecking havoc. Theur report reads...


Read more at Scified (https://www.scified.com/news/jurassic-world-2-to-shoot-in-london-next-year-and-involve-dinosaurs-rampaging-cities)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Mar 29, 2016, 04:19:32 PM
Eeehhhh...Sun.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Mar 29, 2016, 11:23:48 PM
oh my... Jurassic War... no, NO. The f**k is that going to be like?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Mar 29, 2016, 11:28:54 PM
So London is getting f**ked... again. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 29, 2016, 11:35:53 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Mar 29, 2016, 11:23:48 PM
oh my... Jurassic War... no, NO. The f**k is that going to be like?
My thoughts exactly.

My suggestion of JP25 and/or TLW20 with unreleased scenes is looking more and more tempting eh?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Mar 29, 2016, 11:43:41 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Mar 29, 2016, 11:28:54 PM
So London is getting f**ked... again. :laugh:

Is London ever not getting f**ked by dinosaurs?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgb.fotolibra.com%2Fimages%2Fpreviews%2F460615-trafalgar-square-pigeons-1.jpeg&hash=12c74bfcb5327926f245a087972bd870f80ee959)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 29, 2016, 11:53:32 PM
Rumor.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Mar 29, 2016, 11:58:41 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Mar 29, 2016, 11:43:41 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Mar 29, 2016, 11:28:54 PM
So London is getting f**ked... again. :laugh:

Is London ever not getting f**ked by dinosaurs?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgb.fotolibra.com%2Fimages%2Fpreviews%2F460615-trafalgar-square-pigeons-1.jpeg&hash=12c74bfcb5327926f245a087972bd870f80ee959)

(https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-4oiNQoO3VyE/VGQTxW8f1cI/AAAAAAAAv-U/EGYeVC-uYNU/s400/sherlock-holmes-2010-dinosaur-2.jpg)

Even in the 1880s.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Mar 30, 2016, 01:56:14 AM
So London is the new Tokyo? :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 31, 2016, 02:36:03 AM
The war dinosaur angle is so silly, no matter who's coming at it IMO. This. Isn't. DINO-RIDERS.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Mar 31, 2016, 07:17:49 AM
Indeed. I enjoyed JW myself but if they take the weaponized angle too far it'll just ruin it for me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 31, 2016, 07:39:49 AM
There has been no official statement that they're going the weaponised dinosaur route again. JW covered it fine.

All we know so far is from what Colin said here...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BFoF2dbap8
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Mar 31, 2016, 07:47:56 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 31, 2016, 07:39:49 AMThere has been no official statement that they're going the weaponised dinosaur route again. JW covered it fine.

Given that Wu escaped with the modified embryos, I wouldn't be so sure. Why else would you be fiddling with dino DNA outside of a theme park?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 31, 2016, 07:53:42 AM
Why indeed.

Could be any number of reasons.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Mar 31, 2016, 02:33:47 PM
I still think my idea of invasive species and reintegration is a better one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 18, 2016, 05:18:29 PM
J.A. Bayona confirmed to direct the next Jurassic!

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CgVxtwKUkAEaeem.jpg:large)

https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/722105835124584451

I'm very happy with this choice! His direction is beautiful.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 18, 2016, 08:39:47 PM
I hate to say it but my first reaction was, "Who?" The guy has a short director's resume according to IMDB and there's only one film on there that sounds familiar to me; A Monster Calls.

I'm not suggesting he's not up to the task, I'm just saying I'm not gushing about the choice.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 18, 2016, 09:17:18 PM
This is a preview of his work.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCqUoPaaH0I
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 18, 2016, 09:39:53 PM
The clip doesn't tell me much, but it does tell me that that film has an 81% approval rating at Rotten Tomatoes so that's a good sign 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Apr 19, 2016, 03:38:50 AM
I really hope he's capable of bringing some of the horror into this series. Also hopefully it won't be as much trouble getting Universal to let them use more animatronics.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Apr 19, 2016, 03:39:40 AM
I still feel iffy for another JP film. What else could they do next? The idea of dinosaurs on the lose in London reminds me on what they did in the second Jurassic Park movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 19, 2016, 03:41:47 AM
And The Asylum already did a dino on the loose in London in their Sherlock Holmes movie. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 19, 2016, 03:47:16 AM
I'm worried as well. I don't want to see militarized dinosaurs. The idea is silly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 19, 2016, 03:48:12 AM
And then it turns out that JP5 is a stealth remake/reboot of that Dino Riders cartoon.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 19, 2016, 03:50:08 AM
Well we do know that Dino Riders is being rebooted currently, so...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 19, 2016, 03:52:50 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 19, 2016, 03:50:08 AM
Well we do know that Dino Riders is being rebooted currently, so...

10 Dino Rider Lane, then.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: 426Buddy on Apr 19, 2016, 02:30:59 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Apr 19, 2016, 03:39:40 AM
I still feel iffy for another JP film. What else could they do next? The idea of dinosaurs on the lose in London reminds me on what they did in the second Jurassic Park movie.

Gorgo anyone? 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 19, 2016, 08:14:47 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Apr 19, 2016, 03:52:50 AM
Quote from: DoomRulz on Apr 19, 2016, 03:50:08 AM
Well we do know that Dino Riders is being rebooted currently, so...

10 Dino Rider Lane, then.

Bwahahahaha, it'll be Claire and a random park worker from the first movie, locked in a security bunker with Hoskins' cousin.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Apr 28, 2016, 02:52:37 PM
Yo Doom + Alien3:

https://www.screenused.com/?sectionID=item-detail&subsectionID=index.cfm&item_id=18364

https://www.screenused.com/?sectionID=item-detail&subsectionID=index.cfm&item_id=8248

https://www.screenused.com/?sectionID=item-detail&subsectionID=index.cfm&item_id=8250
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Apr 28, 2016, 02:56:17 PM
Not even going to begin to pretend I'd pay that much for the brochure, but that is a seriously cool item!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 28, 2016, 08:09:23 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Apr 28, 2016, 02:52:37 PM
Yo Doom + Alien3:

https://www.screenused.com/?sectionID=item-detail&subsectionID=index.cfm&item_id=18364

https://www.screenused.com/?sectionID=item-detail&subsectionID=index.cfm&item_id=8248

https://www.screenused.com/?sectionID=item-detail&subsectionID=index.cfm&item_id=8250

Not in this lifetime, unfortunately :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Apr 28, 2016, 10:04:24 PM
Personally, I would rather drive to my local Saks Fifth Ave. outlet and pick up a gorgeous Giorgio Armani Dinner Suit (aka tuxedo) and a repro of the packet on ebay than the screen used item. But hey, you never know, I could win the lottery and buy both! ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Apr 29, 2016, 03:19:48 AM
http://moviefail.com/jungle-book-succeeds/

QuoteThe Jungle Book Succeeds Where Jurassic World Fails

This is a really fantastic read.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Apr 29, 2016, 02:32:46 PM
I saw JB. I do not agree at ALL, it feels like an animation movie, not real life. From the 'perfect' waterfalls to the fake animals with human expressions & endless tracking camera shots. From the start it falls flat imho, the new Avatar. I can't believe this article, did we really see the same film?

I must say Jurassic World missed that mystery feeling to it. It has dinosaurs in your face all the time, it's ok to show just an arm or foot to leave something to our imagination the way JP did. Sort of what Predator did too, it keep it suspenseful. But JB's full fake environments and cartoony animals made me check out of it from the start.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 29, 2016, 02:57:29 PM
It's full of a love of nature and its literary and cinematic forebears. I think that was a great article, it's what motivated me to see the film (fan of the book, not a fan of Disney, big fan of wildlife), and I generally agree with it. JW's a bit of an odd choice for a comparison, but it certainly doesn't have anywhere near the love for palaeontology and Crichton's ethos that Jungle Book has for its subject matter.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 29, 2016, 10:16:07 PM
Jurassic World had a lot more CG integrated with live action than Jungle Book. A LOT MORE.
You can't compare the two.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 29, 2016, 10:38:57 PM
I thought the environments and animals were damn well done Jungle Book, with only a few hiccups here and there. There was one green screen shot to rival the tunnel in Kingsman in terms of badness... but at least it didn't have a row soldiers obviously running in place like that one did. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on May 01, 2016, 10:14:48 AM
seems appropriate

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v71to9IHALc
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on May 01, 2016, 11:30:27 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 29, 2016, 10:16:07 PM
Jurassic World had a lot more CG integrated with live action than Jungle Book. A LOT MORE.
You can't compare the two.

That wasn't the point....
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DaddyYautja on May 02, 2016, 06:39:36 AM
This aint JP but it's Dinos

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FKZjwf61.jpg&hash=1acaf9cd9d433d45ca32badf3c0827a688355343)

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/992645470/beasts-of-the-mesozoic-raptor-series-action-figure
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on May 02, 2016, 09:27:06 AM
Bet you'll never look at birds the same way again. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: g2vd on May 03, 2016, 03:42:29 PM
Quote from: DaddyYautja on May 02, 2016, 06:39:36 AM
This aint JP but it's Dinos

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FKZjwf61.jpg&hash=1acaf9cd9d433d45ca32badf3c0827a688355343)

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/992645470/beasts-of-the-mesozoic-raptor-series-action-figure
I really do love the coloration on the middle one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: 2004Zilla on May 04, 2016, 12:12:56 AM
Quote from: g2vd on May 03, 2016, 03:42:29 PM
Quote from: DaddyYautja on May 02, 2016, 06:39:36 AM
This aint JP but it's Dinos

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FKZjwf61.jpg&hash=1acaf9cd9d433d45ca32badf3c0827a688355343)

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/992645470/beasts-of-the-mesozoic-raptor-series-action-figure
I really do love the coloration on the middle one.
Yeah, if I had to pick one to get it'd be the Atrociraptor.

Silva revealed on Twitter the next two he's planning on doing is Saurornitholestes and Balaur bondoc. Looking at the box packaging I can also spot Dromaeosaurus and Pyroraptor. Not sure what the others are.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on May 04, 2016, 10:21:47 AM
http://kotaku.com/guy-builds-tiny-jurassic-park-for-his-tortoise-1774421138

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBXpL12slFM
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on May 04, 2016, 02:24:52 PM
They never attack the same place twice. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on May 10, 2016, 06:37:33 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4dQWWrTcVQ
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on May 12, 2016, 03:15:44 AM
Yo Doom:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/JURASSIC-PARK-CHAOS-EFFECT-VELOCIRAPTORYX-KENNER-TESTSHOT-PROTOTYPE-SAMPLE-/252377774783?hash=item3ac2e33abf:g:7IQAAOSwys5WVmS9

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Jurassic-Park-Series-1-SEALED-CASE-Dinosaurs-1993-Kenner-16-piece-MOC-Red-Cards-/381621682604?hash=item58da6cc1ac:g:RRAAAOSw5HJXKVjv
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ryu on May 12, 2016, 12:59:44 PM
(https://scontent.flis2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/13138926_976044699117558_5984036101469684234_n.jpg?oh=eb12da36f2d9c434f381b5f5fe6e05c8&oe=57E0010A)
(https://scontent.flis2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/13221018_976045019117526_9061857089928829317_n.jpg?oh=ba81428f9218c4aafe9f8bdf9becd133&oe=57E5DA1F)
(https://scontent.flis2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/13220939_976044855784209_382440382121135989_n.jpg?oh=9bb9c23be493e93cb17a2a46c0d95f7d&oe=57DD3B16)
(https://scontent.flis2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/13139332_976044942450867_1873794618445530571_n.jpg?oh=d5769395edfccb135457d7b8cafd8901&oe=57AEA7B3)
(https://scontent.flis2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/13177895_976044925784202_8482010407970570314_n.jpg?oh=8a48739cfcca1afdb24041e712b345e7&oe=57D83E11)
(https://scontent.flis2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/13164318_976044952450866_8442476009495599384_n.jpg?oh=81f4cf921fa883d1e18bdf6dd80aacab&oe=57DCC8CA)
(https://scontent.flis2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/13221098_976044989117529_4435960475541259476_n.jpg?oh=7984fe53723d238762f46bd57858ff38&oe=579F4921)
BEST LOVE STORY ,better than  Twilight.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DaddyYautja on May 12, 2016, 09:00:57 PM
That's one of the best things i've seen in a while.

some one needs to make a show out of this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Requiem28 on Jun 21, 2016, 11:09:30 PM
Quote from: Ryu on May 12, 2016, 12:59:44 PM
(https://scontent.flis2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/13138926_976044699117558_5984036101469684234_n.jpg?oh=eb12da36f2d9c434f381b5f5fe6e05c8&oe=57E0010A)
(https://scontent.flis2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/13221018_976045019117526_9061857089928829317_n.jpg?oh=ba81428f9218c4aafe9f8bdf9becd133&oe=57E5DA1F)
(https://scontent.flis2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/13220939_976044855784209_382440382121135989_n.jpg?oh=9bb9c23be493e93cb17a2a46c0d95f7d&oe=57DD3B16)
(https://scontent.flis2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/13139332_976044942450867_1873794618445530571_n.jpg?oh=d5769395edfccb135457d7b8cafd8901&oe=57AEA7B3)
(https://scontent.flis2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/13177895_976044925784202_8482010407970570314_n.jpg?oh=8a48739cfcca1afdb24041e712b345e7&oe=57D83E11)
(https://scontent.flis2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/13164318_976044952450866_8442476009495599384_n.jpg?oh=81f4cf921fa883d1e18bdf6dd80aacab&oe=57DCC8CA)
(https://scontent.flis2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/13221098_976044989117529_4435960475541259476_n.jpg?oh=7984fe53723d238762f46bd57858ff38&oe=579F4921)
BEST LOVE STORY ,better than  Twilight.

Haha, nice, and great art
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Jun 22, 2016, 09:34:39 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fjurassicoutpost.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F06%2Fjurassic-world-2-poster-1-e1466525147469.jpg&hash=f36669d5b1f6ea62b3b68d01f279659595fb2ad6)

QuoteFor those following the production closely, they will recognize the temporary 'June 22nd, 2018' logo from the date announcement which happened in July of last year. While the logo isn't anything new, it's still exciting to see some official promo material. It's unclear if the untitled Jurassic World sequel has any other presence at the expo, perhaps behind closed doors, but we will be sure to post any updates should they arise.

http://jurassicoutpost.com/first-jurassic-world-promo-poster-2016-las-vegas-licensing-expo/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 11, 2016, 11:00:26 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqWH_tAFaJY

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnHkKebWcAADale.jpg:large)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 12, 2016, 12:05:20 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jul 11, 2016, 11:00:26 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqWH_tAFaJY
Interesting theory, good points and realistic point of view.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 14, 2016, 06:58:21 AM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 12, 2016, 12:05:20 AM
Interesting theory, good points and realistic point of view.

Cheers man!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSWV2XO_Hak

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XYTKTCWaUo
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jul 21, 2016, 11:22:09 PM
https://twitter.com/GeekTyrant/status/756245481227821056
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 21, 2016, 11:30:37 PM
Had to share this in the JP thread, too:

(https://media.giphy.com/media/3oD3YQjT2cSZTsy6Va/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 22, 2016, 01:58:00 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Jul 21, 2016, 11:22:09 PM
https://twitter.com/GeekTyrant/status/756245481227821056
Very relieved to know they are going back to Hawaii to film.

Quote from: KiramidHead on Jul 21, 2016, 11:30:37 PM
Had to share this in the JP thread, too:

https://media.giphy.com/media/3oD3YQjT2cSZTsy6Va/giphy.gif
Awww so cute.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jul 22, 2016, 07:11:33 AM
Filming in Hawaii suggests they're still on Isla Nublar, I guess.

Always found it a bit odd how they've never filmed anything actually in Costa Rica, it's a beautiful country and a major element of the books.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 28, 2016, 05:30:35 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jul 22, 2016, 07:11:33 AM
Always found it a bit odd how they've never filmed anything actually in Costa Rica, it's a beautiful country and a major element of the books.
Indeed. Maybe CR would provide too much monetary risk for equipment and the actors, but what do I know. :P

Wonder if Doom or Alien3 would want this in their game room?

http://www.ebay.com/itm/SD016-JURASSIC-PARK-HOLLYWOO-MOVIE-POSTER-DINOSAUR-TOY-NEON-LIGHT-SIGN-9-x-7/142041097915?_trksid=p2047675.c100010.m2109&_trkparms=aid%3D222007%26algo%3DSIC.MBE%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D37798%26meid%3Dc7fd35bbea76460e9514e20b9cfff86b%26pid%3D100010%26rk%3D3%26rkt%3D14%26sd%3D302023388716
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 28, 2016, 08:02:52 PM
I would love it.

Ain't got the cash spare. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Aug 16, 2016, 01:33:50 PM
Stumbled upon this today, wondering if this is from a deleted scene of Lex and Tim arriving to Isla Numbar... ???

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F-4yyd8vBt6EU%2FTVp64SjXPSI%2FAAAAAAAAAuU%2FIxVGHXWFQiQ%2Fs1600%2Fheli.bmp&hash=1ec5fafb3c10d10998cbb7319f26bf7bbf6f7c5a)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 16, 2016, 02:11:14 PM
What makes you think that picture is JP related? ??? ::)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Aug 16, 2016, 02:58:47 PM
Upon further inspection, I don't see the ingen logo on the choppa. The pic came from a fan blog site, talking about events from the book and movie from Lex's point of view. I am just dying to see the deleted/extended scenes from the original film. :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 16, 2016, 03:01:07 PM
"It doesn't say InGen on the side of that chopper." - Eddie Carr.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Aug 16, 2016, 03:15:40 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgeekologie.com%2F2014%2F10%2F16%2Fjeff-goldblum-jurassic-park-laugh.jpg&hash=6ad4bb7015696e631d878ab570341cb309e57655)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Aug 16, 2016, 03:58:13 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Aug 16, 2016, 03:15:40 PM(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgeekologie.com%2F2014%2F10%2F16%2Fjeff-goldblum-jurassic-park-laugh.jpg&hash=6ad4bb7015696e631d878ab570341cb309e57655)

:laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space Invader on Aug 17, 2016, 03:02:38 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Aug 16, 2016, 03:01:07 PM
"It doesn't say InGen on the side of that chopper." - Eddie Carr.

"I don't get that. Why would Hammond send 2 teams?"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Aug 17, 2016, 09:48:46 AM
"Rex just fed, so he won't stalk us for food."

Man, Postlethwaite was so awesome in that film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Aug 17, 2016, 11:25:31 AM
I love the deleted scene with him and Ajay at the Mombai bar:

"You broke that man's jaw for no other reason than your own boredom."

Why that was cut is still beyond me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Aug 17, 2016, 02:24:48 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Aug 17, 2016, 11:25:31 AM
I love the deleted scene with him and Ajay at the Mombai bar:

"You broke that man's jaw for no other reason than your own boredom."

Why that was cut is still beyond me.

Because Spielberg thought it made him look too heroic. Didn't fit with the message he was pushing. Same thing with the real reason the baby rex's leg got broken.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Aug 17, 2016, 03:42:52 PM
I kinda thought that was the reason (for both).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Sep 12, 2016, 03:48:35 AM
Probably just a fan or maybe something more to it?  I wouldn't mind if he was in the sequel.

https://twitter.com/TheRock/status/775177415177809920
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Sep 12, 2016, 08:57:14 AM
I swear Rock must have several identical twins to handle his workload. Even if this tweet isn't indicative of him angling for a role, he's somehow managing to balance the lead role in a series, occasional wrestling appearances, a huge action film franchise, umpteen gazillion other movies, constant talk show appearances, charity stuff, and still finds time to tweet like he's permanently jacked into the thing.

Still, if he's interested, it might be a good idea for the producers to have a chat with him.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 12, 2016, 09:39:00 AM
I can totally see him at least doing a quick cameo...

*T-Rex finds way into WWE event
*The Rock is in the ring, then looks at T-Rex
"The Rock says know your role and shut your mouth when you are eating people."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Sep 12, 2016, 11:07:37 AM
After jurassic world and fast 7 or 8 or whatever the last one was, I wouldn't be surprised to see the rock beat a raptor in a barehanded fistfight. I'm also now thinking of a fast/jurassic crossover with raptors trained to drive sports cars... with NOS.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Sep 30, 2016, 08:26:14 PM
https://twitter.com/slashfilm/status/781931664419254272
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 30, 2016, 09:59:57 PM
Most excellent news. You da man ace3g.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Oct 01, 2016, 04:23:19 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Sep 30, 2016, 08:26:14 PM
https://twitter.com/slashfilm/status/781931664419254272
sweet more animatronics!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Nov 07, 2016, 08:41:00 PM
First casting announcements for Jurassic World 2

http://jurassicoutpost.com/toby-jones-rafe-spall-talks-join-jurassic-world-2/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MrSpaceJockey on Nov 07, 2016, 10:40:24 PM
Wonder what deadly creature is going to jump down Milburn's throat this time...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 08, 2016, 12:29:33 AM
So Zola will be in a robo-dino body, I take it. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Nov 08, 2016, 01:02:18 AM
Quote from: Xan21 on Nov 07, 2016, 08:41:00 PM
First casting announcements for Jurassic World 2

http://jurassicoutpost.com/toby-jones-rafe-spall-talks-join-jurassic-world-2/
I can definitely see that younger actor play dodson
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Nov 23, 2016, 07:46:00 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Sep 12, 2016, 08:57:14 AM
I swear Rock must have several identical twins to handle his workload. Even if this tweet isn't indicative of him angling for a role, he's somehow managing to balance the lead role in a series, occasional wrestling appearances, a huge action film franchise, umpteen gazillion other movies, constant talk show appearances, charity stuff, and still finds time to tweet like he's permanently jacked into the thing.

Still, if he's interested, it might be a good idea for the producers to have a chat with him.

I can't see him being in a film like this. Every movie he's done either has him in the lead or he's playing a role that was written specifically for him, i.e. Hobbes in the F&F films. I just think he'd stick out like a sore thumb.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Nov 29, 2016, 08:18:17 PM
Dr Wu will probably be back

http://jurassicoutpost.com/frank-marshall-teases-b-d-wongs-return-jurassic-world-sequel/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Nov 29, 2016, 08:21:38 PM
Yay?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Nov 29, 2016, 09:35:22 PM
He's great in Mr Robot, if there's anyone out there not watching it. Only shows up very rarely though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Dec 01, 2016, 11:36:07 PM
Justice Smith joins Jurassic World II

http://jurassicoutpost.com/justice-smith-joins-jurassic-world-2-cast/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Dec 10, 2016, 05:35:08 PM
Check out Jurassic World Regenesis.

Best viewed on Google Chrome (Not overly mobile friendly at this time)

http://www.timackcreations.com/jwregenesis
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Astronoë on Jan 22, 2017, 07:08:00 PM
I suggest instead of civilian jeeps, they go with armored vehicles this time..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0kkfxKuKTlU
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naissus on Jan 23, 2017, 12:05:11 AM
I wonder where they will go from here?  The "lets make a park" concept has been done enough.  None of the characters are central and have a story that must continue.  There are only two choices I can think of without being repetitive.  Continue the military/biopunk biological weapon or decide that these creatures deserve to be preserve and start creating habits for them to increase in numbers around the world.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jan 23, 2017, 11:23:13 AM
Quote from: Naissus on Jan 23, 2017, 12:05:11 AMContinue the military/biopunk biological weapon...

Considering that this idea was the main plot of the fourth film throughout it's loooong period of development, I imagine this is exactly where they'll be going in the future.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: skhellter on Jan 23, 2017, 04:17:31 PM
Jurassic World was a (dumb) fun mess but still better than lost world and 3.


Interested in how the sequel shakes up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 23, 2017, 04:44:31 PM
Maybe they'll resurrect John Sayles' raptor swat team. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: skhellter on Jan 23, 2017, 04:56:43 PM
Complete with a dilophosaurus support team.  :D

That script was full on b-movie style..... weird as shit.
Jurassic Park done with the tone of "Commando".  :laugh:



I still liked its characters better than anyone in Jurassic World, tbh.
Claire and Owen were annoying as shit.
Raptor Blue was the only cool character
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Pvt. Himmel on Jan 23, 2017, 11:54:00 PM
Daniella Pineda joins cast Jurassic World 2!!

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs24.postimg.org%2Fu0anwxid1%2Fjurassic_daniella.jpg&hash=9583992b9e33a10e7656f088ecbc2b4008c670d4)

  https://variety.com/2017/film/news/jurassic-world-sequel-danielle-pineda-the-detour-1201967088/    (https://variety.com/2017/film/news/jurassic-world-sequel-danielle-pineda-the-detour-1201967088/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jan 23, 2017, 11:58:26 PM
issue with link above

https://twitter.com/Variety/status/823657156813561856
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Pvt. Himmel on Jan 24, 2017, 12:03:18 AM
Fixed it thanks.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Jan 24, 2017, 02:59:23 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fpre08.deviantart.net%2Ff440%2Fth%2Fpre%2Ff%2F2016%2F151%2Fd%2F8%2Fd8fe6b6c5985c2cb4b0d8eef1df61868-da0ccow.jpg&hash=67d6978efdceb82a146e4c28c0743e220828af77)
http://paleocolour.deviantart.com/art/Jurassic-Park-Then-and-Now-605238080
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jan 24, 2017, 04:13:23 AM
Quote from: Gilfryd on Jan 24, 2017, 02:59:23 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fpre08.deviantart.net%2Ff440%2Fth%2Fpre%2Ff%2F2016%2F151%2Fd%2F8%2Fd8fe6b6c5985c2cb4b0d8eef1df61868-da0ccow.jpg&hash=67d6978efdceb82a146e4c28c0743e220828af77)
http://paleocolour.deviantart.com/art/Jurassic-Park-Then-and-Now-605238080
Always loved the running Rex!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: nanison on Jan 26, 2017, 01:16:09 AM
Jurassic World was basically what I wanted the original film to be. Mayhem in an open park. It delivered, hope they'll find a new original angle for the sequel. Also the kids are not half as irritating as the original kids, there are less cutie moments like f.e. with the brachiosaurus sneezing, less smart ass kids knowing every dinosaur by name in an instant.
Yeah I loved it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Jan 26, 2017, 01:41:14 AM
Quote from: nanison on Jan 26, 2017, 01:16:09 AM
Jurassic World was basically what I wanted the original film to be. Mayhem in an open park. It delivered, hope they'll find a new original angle for the sequel. Also the kids are not half as irritating as the original kids, there are less cutie moments like f.e. with the brachiosaurus sneezing, less smart ass kids knowing every dinosaur by name in an instant.
Yeah I loved it.
yea im right there with you. Still think jurassic park is the strongest in the series but jw is my second favorite.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jan 26, 2017, 02:22:19 AM
Jurassic World was very good overall, but let's be serious here: any Jurassic movie without Jeff Goldblum is not a top contender...

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Forig09.deviantart.net%2Fc357%2Ff%2F2012%2F099%2F0%2F3%2Fjurassic_park_motivational__1_by_psychicxpsychosirin-d4vlhkk.jpg&hash=2118860cfca0a814ddb44112ddc984ffdcc38115)

;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jan 26, 2017, 11:02:29 AM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Jan 26, 2017, 02:22:19 AMJurassic World was very good overall, but let's be serious here: any Jurassic movie without Jeff Goldblum is not a top contender...

Joking aside, my absolute favourite thing about The Lost World is that they took the best supporting character from the first film and made him the lead.

Kinda like when they did that sequel to The Fugitive that followed Tommy Lee Jones' character.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jan 26, 2017, 11:23:56 AM
Yes indeed!
I did like US Marshals, wasn't the Fugitive good, but still a decent watch.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Pvt. Himmel on Jan 26, 2017, 02:37:45 PM
Production has begun!!

https://twitter.com/FilmBayona/status/824587252613468164 (https://twitter.com/FilmBayona/status/824587252613468164)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Feb 10, 2017, 07:03:48 PM
Ted Levine (Buffalo Bill from Silence of the lambs) has joined Jurassic World II
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Feb 10, 2017, 08:06:27 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on Feb 10, 2017, 07:03:48 PM
Ted Levine (Buffalo Bill from Silence of the lambs) has joined Jurassic World II
possibly playing dodson?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Feb 10, 2017, 08:09:27 PM
Quote from: frenchfries on Feb 10, 2017, 08:06:27 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on Feb 10, 2017, 07:03:48 PM
Ted Levine (Buffalo Bill from Silence of the lambs) has joined Jurassic World II
possibly playing dodson?

Dodgson, we've got Dodgson here!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Feb 10, 2017, 08:16:31 PM
With every male being cast everyone goes Dodgson... I'm not getting my hopes up... but Ted will be awesome for sure
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Feb 10, 2017, 10:48:08 PM
Could be Dodgson, he's about the same age as the actor from Jurassic Park, and they have a bit of resemblance.

There's a good reason why everyone always knee-jerks Dodgson, his character's one of the bigger untapped threads remaining from both the books. They'd have to neuter the language a bit though....
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Feb 10, 2017, 11:11:11 PM
It rubs the lotion on its skin, it does this whenever it's told.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Feb 11, 2017, 04:49:48 PM
The film will be worth seeing for Ted Levine's voice alone.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Feb 11, 2017, 08:34:40 PM
I wonder who will play Lucy...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Feb 14, 2017, 11:54:25 PM
https://twitter.com/LeDoctor/status/831536451565268993
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Feb 16, 2017, 03:51:45 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4bXbcJrR38

and

James Cromwell (I robot) joins cast

http://jurassicoutpost.com/james-cromwell-joins-cast-jurassic-world-2/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Feb 16, 2017, 10:11:01 PM
Zefram Cochrane. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vermillion on Feb 17, 2017, 01:38:50 AM
Magic Carpet Ride
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Feb 17, 2017, 03:29:53 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Feb 16, 2017, 10:11:01 PM
Zefram Cochrane. 8)

Very nice! Can't help but picture him in a Hammond type role.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Feb 17, 2017, 04:10:47 PM
Danielle posted a picture of a card that had the movie title on it but obscured it with her thumb... it is a short title... Jurassic ... War?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Feb 17, 2017, 07:37:48 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on Feb 17, 2017, 04:10:47 PM
Danielle posted a picture of a card that had the movie title on it but obscured it with her thumb... it is a short title... Jurassic ... War?
wheres the pic!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Feb 17, 2017, 08:26:22 PM
(https://s13.postimg.org/4rubzytyr/Screenshot_20170217_212351.png) (https://postimg.org/image/4rubzytyr/)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: genocyber on Feb 17, 2017, 09:05:48 PM
I hope the sequel goes back to the gloomy foreboding atmosphere the first movie had. The park in disarray, heavy rain and winds pouring down, signs of destroyed cages and blood splattered on the walls.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Feb 17, 2017, 09:19:40 PM
Yes at least J.A. Bayona realises what made the first one so great

(https://s31.postimg.org/axbwl9rbv/C44xtiv_Vc_AIfvks.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Feb 17, 2017, 10:58:11 PM
Quote from: genocyber on Feb 17, 2017, 09:05:48 PM
I hope the sequel goes back to the gloomy foreboding atmosphere the first movie had. The park in disarray, heavy rain and winds pouring down, signs of destroyed cages and blood splattered on the walls.
according to the directors and producers, that seems to be the aim. scified posted an article on what they think the title is and i think they are spot on! "jurassic age"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naissus on Feb 18, 2017, 01:25:58 PM
Was there ever a vision doc or screenplay produced for Camerons take on Jurassic Park?  A darker horror oriented version would be awesome to read!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Feb 23, 2017, 10:26:58 AM
 Filming has begun

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fjurassicoutpost.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2017%2F02%2FuKtZ6Wc--1024x576.jpg&hash=4fde395818b85931b4dfb8de5d2b0d97dbe87aff)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Feb 23, 2017, 10:41:21 AM
Say whaaaat... ?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Feb 24, 2017, 02:34:01 PM
Day 1

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C5bqMFAWgAAumWx.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Mar 05, 2017, 06:05:39 PM
https://twitter.com/FilmBayona/status/838437852451123201
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Mar 05, 2017, 06:25:50 PM
I heard rumors before since she plays in every other Bayona film I believe

Epoch?

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C6IGMr4VUAAA7tr.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Mar 06, 2017, 01:10:47 AM
Quote from: Xan21 on Mar 05, 2017, 06:25:50 PM
I heard rumors before since she plays in every other Bayona film I believe

Epoch?

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C6IGMr4VUAAA7tr.jpg)
I think that was an error but i hope they go with the speculated title jurassic age.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 06, 2017, 03:37:58 AM
I have a bottle of champagne to open once Jeff Goldblum is announced to join the cast :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Mar 06, 2017, 01:22:06 PM
Quote from: frenchfries on Mar 06, 2017, 01:10:47 AM
Quote from: Xan21 on Mar 05, 2017, 06:25:50 PM
I heard rumors before since she plays in every other Bayona film I believe

Epoch?

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C6IGMr4VUAAA7tr.jpg)
I think that was an error but i hope they go with the speculated title jurassic age.

Jurassic Epoch also appeared shortly on the official site back in November with a background of a volcano but somebody could have easily cocked up this latest 'leak'. I personally like it... I don't like Age/ Extinction etc... although I'd rather have the worktitle Ancient Futures. Update: turned out to be false info

Two character names revealed : Maisie & Eversoll
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: newagescamartist on Mar 07, 2017, 03:50:05 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 06, 2017, 03:37:58 AM
I have a bottle of champagne to open once Jeff Goldblum is announced to join the cast :D

I really hope you get to open that bottle.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 07, 2017, 11:16:44 PM
Lets hope that...
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.quotesgram.com%2Fimg%2F39%2F98%2F2123257371-jurassic-park-gallery-1.jpg&hash=e755dbec8dadcbf0033a623ae3aabb395e9ab66c)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Mar 08, 2017, 08:45:38 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fjurassicoutpost.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2017%2F03%2FJP5-Trevorrow-Concept-Art-Twitter.jpg&hash=c4e3bd2b2c659f68a6f57044c0af5a62fce28b40)

First official photo
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 09, 2017, 12:08:39 AM
Just amazing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Mar 09, 2017, 02:05:17 AM
Quote from: Xan21 on Mar 08, 2017, 08:45:38 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fjurassicoutpost.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2017%2F03%2FJP5-Trevorrow-Concept-Art-Twitter.jpg&hash=c4e3bd2b2c659f68a6f57044c0af5a62fce28b40)

First official photo
guys, i'm hyped as hell right now!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 09, 2017, 02:20:49 AM
Awesome pic. Looks like a private museum... ?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Mar 09, 2017, 08:07:24 PM
We have 'Lucy'  the girl on the pic is Brooke Norbury

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.castcall.blue-compass.com.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fportfolioraw%2F1326%2F1326367.jpg&hash=ad3c7d5826ab70fac42136687f8322fae4f3c29f)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Mar 10, 2017, 04:05:33 AM
Popular theory is that lucy is Hammond's great daughter
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Mar 10, 2017, 09:40:55 AM
Doubt it... I think she is the (grand) daughter of one the trophy hunters.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Mar 17, 2017, 10:13:52 PM

Animatronicssss


(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C7JRV60XQAIl6fm.jpg)♧♧
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Mar 17, 2017, 11:09:11 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on Mar 17, 2017, 10:13:52 PM

Animatronicssss


(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C7JRV60XQAIl6fm.jpg)♧♧
hype!!! i have a really good feeling about this film! Jurassic park is my favorite film of all time so i hope they can pull this off but they seem to be off to a good start.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 09, 2017, 10:19:07 AM
For anyone interested, chapter 3 is online.

(only available on desktop computer or laptop and best experience on Google Chrome)

http://www.timackcreations.com/jwregenesis
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on Apr 09, 2017, 12:51:32 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 09, 2017, 10:19:07 AM
For anyone interested, chapter 3 is online.

(only available on desktop computer or laptop and best experience on Google Chrome)

http://www.timackcreations.com/jwregenesis

Dude, just saw all 3 chapters now. This stuff is amazing. Are you behind this?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Apr 09, 2017, 01:32:13 PM
Setbuilding in Hawaii

(https://s12.postimg.org/5k9pqt9m5/17854796_726904407518408_7633900274341277532_o.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Apr 09, 2017, 10:45:21 PM
Looks like a nice big cage...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 10, 2017, 01:35:22 AM
Quote from: Tangakkai on Apr 09, 2017, 12:51:32 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 09, 2017, 10:19:07 AM
For anyone interested, chapter 3 is online.

(only available on desktop computer or laptop and best experience on Google Chrome)

http://www.timackcreations.com/jwregenesis

Dude, just saw all 3 chapters now. This stuff is amazing. Are you behind this?

Yeah I'm one of its creators. Thanks for checking it out!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Apr 11, 2017, 04:26:25 PM
Ooohhh exciting!

Spoiler
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C9JILWCXoAAlSX5.jpg)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bad Replicant on Apr 11, 2017, 04:46:32 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on Apr 11, 2017, 04:26:25 PM
Ooohhh exciting!

Spoiler
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C9JILWCXoAAlSX5.jpg)
[close]

Geez, that took long enough. Should've been brought back (for more than a cameo) by number 3.

Also, I'm obviously out of the loop here, but I'm surprised Legacy FX didn't land this one. Is there a story on that?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 11, 2017, 04:51:53 PM
Since they're shooting in England it's cheaper to use Neal Scanlan FX instead of porting Legacy FX over from the States
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Bad Replicant on Apr 11, 2017, 04:58:14 PM
 >:(

Oh well. Scanlan's team does great work too, obviously. Just sad to think about a JP film without the Winston connection.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 11, 2017, 05:17:06 PM
Sad it ain't, it's heartwrenching
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Apr 11, 2017, 05:52:25 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on Apr 11, 2017, 04:26:25 PM
Ooohhh exciting!

Spoiler
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C9JILWCXoAAlSX5.jpg)
[close]
now they're really teasing :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Apr 11, 2017, 10:26:32 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on Apr 11, 2017, 04:26:25 PM
Ooohhh exciting!

Spoiler
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C9JILWCXoAAlSX5.jpg)
[close]
Yes finally a pic of a dino!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 11, 2017, 10:32:56 PM
Stick stupid!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Apr 12, 2017, 12:37:27 AM
:laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 12, 2017, 12:43:06 AM
They should bring back Nedry a la Okun in ID: Resurgence.

Spoiler
Okay, I'm kidding.
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstream1.gifsoup.com%2Fview%2F445774%2Fjurassic-park-nedry-o.gif&hash=3f2f80cb9ae7907a11d9806b13e0cd67bb043ea8)
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Scorpio on Apr 12, 2017, 01:22:37 AM
Nedry is the best villain out of all the movies.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vermillion on Apr 12, 2017, 01:49:41 AM
Nice hat!

Lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Apr 21, 2017, 06:23:47 PM
I can spot three new dinos... but they seem more like statues.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C98eMGLV0AAtiWE.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 21, 2017, 06:26:16 PM
Lol, Trevorrow's name is obscured in the background. "You got yer Star Wars gig, now piss off!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 22, 2017, 12:18:38 AM
Is curious that he's so hands-on with the project, despite not directing, and presumably having started work on that space wizard movie by now. Add in that he co-wrote the scripts of both JW films, and it does feel a bit like the new series is his baby. Or that he treats it as such, at least.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Apr 22, 2017, 12:33:49 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Apr 22, 2017, 12:18:38 AM
Is curious that he's so hands-on with the project, despite not directing, and presumably having started work on that space wizard movie by now. Add in that he co-wrote the scripts of both JW films, and it does feel a bit like the new series is his baby. Or that he treats it as such, at least.
he has taken on the role that spielberg had when he did jw
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 26, 2017, 01:37:25 AM
Guess who's back in town

https://twitter.com/THR/status/857045272324714497
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 26, 2017, 01:42:12 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Apr 26, 2017, 01:37:25 AM
Guess who's back in town

https://twitter.com/THR/status/857045272324714497

They brought a rock star.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: nanison on Apr 26, 2017, 01:49:17 AM
I hope I can resist all the spoilers and footage when the ball starts rolling. I managed with the last one and I had a wonderful experience, makes movies so much better.
I failed for Kong Skull Island big time and as a result I wasn't blown away by the film at all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 26, 2017, 02:13:48 AM
Quote from: nanison on Apr 26, 2017, 01:49:17 AM
I failed for Kong Skull Island big time and as a result I wasn't blown away by the film at all.
Might have to do w/ the fact Kong Skull Island was a SHIT DOOFUS
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Scorpio on Apr 26, 2017, 02:26:23 AM
Sam Neill was the star of Jurassic Park, Goldblum is a supporting character.  But they won't bring back Sam Neill because he hasn't been in a hit movie for a while.  They might bring back Laura Dern though as she's in the new Star Wars.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Apr 26, 2017, 03:02:31 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Apr 26, 2017, 01:37:25 AM
Guess who's back in town

https://twitter.com/THR/status/857045272324714497
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QyJBPfQv1wQ
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Apr 26, 2017, 04:11:31 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Apr 26, 2017, 01:37:25 AM
Guess who's back in town

https://twitter.com/THR/status/857045272324714497

Spoiler
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 06, 2017, 03:37:58 AM
I have a bottle of champagne to open once Jeff Goldblum is announced to join the cast :D
[close]
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgflip.com%2Fn0gny.jpg&hash=1dba158f91be85a29bf77d9d8caf99de1f1f83be)

Time to pop that bottle!  :D :D :D :D :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Apr 26, 2017, 06:51:45 AM
I'm in shock and glee that hes back ha totally thought he was never coming back.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Apr 26, 2017, 08:45:42 AM
Quote from: Scorpio on Apr 26, 2017, 02:26:23 AMBut they won't bring back Sam Neill because he hasn't been in a hit movie for a while.

There's also the fact the last Jurassic movie he was in was shit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Apr 26, 2017, 10:11:50 AM
It may not have been a commercial hit but 'Hunt for the Wilderpeople' was amazing... I take that over the crap that was Resurgence... but hey... great news.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PierreVW on Apr 26, 2017, 04:50:58 PM
I love Jeff Goldblum.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Apr 26, 2017, 06:57:50 PM
http://jurassicoutpost.com/james-cromwell-shares-playing-benjamin-lockwood-connection-john-hammond-jurassic-world-2/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Scorpio on Apr 27, 2017, 12:53:45 AM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Apr 26, 2017, 08:45:42 AM
Quote from: Scorpio on Apr 26, 2017, 02:26:23 AMBut they won't bring back Sam Neill because he hasn't been in a hit movie for a while.

There's also the fact the last Jurassic movie he was in was shit.

I have a soft spot for JPIII, even though I understand the nerd rage.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Apr 27, 2017, 08:30:03 AM
I resent the implication anyone who doesn't like it is suffering from "nerd rage".

The fact is it just wasn't a very good film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Apr 27, 2017, 10:11:38 AM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Apr 27, 2017, 08:30:03 AM
I resent the implication anyone who doesn't like it is suffering from "nerd rage".

The fact is it just wasn't a very good film.

Sorry dude. Its not a fact. Some may think its good.

I dont lol.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 27, 2017, 10:40:23 AM
Quote from: Scorpio on Apr 27, 2017, 12:53:45 AM
I have a soft spot for JPIII, even though I understand the nerd rage.

My opinion, it's the worst of the series but not that far below Lost World or Jurassic World. I love the way it's filmed, the sets are fantastic, the raptor effects are arguably the best in the series, it's got a good sense of humour, Grant makes a better protagonist than depressed stress-ball Malcolm (if sexy mathematician Malcolm had made a return, that would be a different story).

I mean, the animal behaviour isn't vaguely believable, some of the non-raptor creature effects are a bit ropey, script is a bit shit (well, a lot shit), the family side-story doesn't work, there's little science behind it and it's ridiculously short, but... oh what am I saying, f**k that film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 27, 2017, 10:49:27 AM
Re: "nerd rage" comments -- it's very easy to mix up people who don't like JPIII as a film and those who hate on it because "no way the spino could kill the t.rex!!!!1!1!1!"

The latters are those that have the T.rex as their power fantasy and when it gets killed it contradicts its status of invincible or indestructible (power fantasy) thus infuriating said people. So those are the ones "nerd-raging"

As a kid I was among those actually but growing up I realized that it was just a film (with the spino vs rex scene being a cheap way to establish the new villain as superior -- it's a common trope). Besides that I do enjoy the film but it's creatively a bit stale -- cheap excuse to go back to the island, the military showing up at the end etc. Its virtues lie in the pacing, the tightly packed visual narration and photography, and some scenes are terrific (Pterosaur cage scene)

But

Please someone hold me because the fact the island looks NOTHING like the previous film's PISSES ME OFF to no end. Makes zero sense
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 27, 2017, 10:55:09 AM
I'm fine with the 'clash of the titans' sequence, it looks great and it's exciting. The "Pteranodon" on the other hand... no. Just no. Terrible designs, dodgy effects, no trace of plausibility.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Apr 27, 2017, 10:56:50 AM
Quote from: Omegamorph on Apr 27, 2017, 10:49:27 AMRe: "nerd rage" comments -- it's very easy to mix up people who don't like JPIII as a film and those who hate on it because "no way the spino could kill the t.rex!!!!1!1!1!"

The Spinosaurus killing the T-rex was ironically one of the things I really loved about JPIII :laugh: I thought the Spinosaurus in general was really awesome. It just annoys me that it's left languishing in such a naff movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 27, 2017, 11:30:49 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Apr 27, 2017, 10:55:09 AM
I'm fine with the 'clash of the titans' sequence, it looks great and it's exciting. The "Pteranodon" on the other hand... no. Just no. Terrible designs, dodgy effects, no trace of plausibility.
Dude the Pteranodon silhouette on the bridge and the Pteranodon turning its head towards Grant as the other two pick on Billy on the river are literally the best scenes in the film

Quote from: HuDaFuK on Apr 27, 2017, 10:56:50 AM
Quote from: Omegamorph on Apr 27, 2017, 10:49:27 AMRe: "nerd rage" comments -- it's very easy to mix up people who don't like JPIII as a film and those who hate on it because "no way the spino could kill the t.rex!!!!1!1!1!"

The Spinosaurus killing the T-rex was ironically one of the things I really loved about JPIII :laugh: I thought the Spinosaurus in general was really awesome. It just annoys me that it's left languishing in such a naff movie.
You should print the first part of your post on steel plates and then drop them on the JP fanbase saying "look on my works, ye mighty, and despair"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Apr 27, 2017, 05:52:50 PM
Yeah, IRL spinosaurus couldn't even kill anything larger than an Acrocanthosaurus. It was a quadruped that swam. Its main competition would've come from Sarchosuchus and Charcharodontosaurus (edited sorry the Giga was the Charcharo's South American relative), neither of which it would stand a chance against in a fight due to its bulky size and lack of combat skills. Spinosaur was a piscivore, and a scavenger.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 27, 2017, 06:08:27 PM
Quote from: Gate on Apr 27, 2017, 05:52:50 PM
Yeah, IRL spinosaurus couldn't even kill anything larger than an Acrocanthosaurus. It was a quadruped that swam. Its main competition would've come from Sarchosuchus and Giganatosaurus, neither of which it would stand a chance against in a fight due to its bulky size and lack of combat skills. Spinosaur was a piscivore, and a scavenger.
Case in point
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Apr 27, 2017, 07:11:50 PM
It's not me nerd-raging. It's me recognizing that at the time of the film, the Spinosaur had an incorrect skeletal alignment in science. The biggest excuse in this series is "genetic mutants" but I still laugh my ass off that they "Discovered" Utahraptor during the production of the first film.

Yes, I enjoy scientific accuracy because it's usually under-represented in media depicting the Mesozoic. But I'll settle for this instead:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlJnayw3_Ak
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 27, 2017, 07:52:38 PM
Quote from: Gate on Apr 27, 2017, 07:11:50 PM
It's not me nerd-raging. It's me recognizing that at the time of the film, the Spinosaur had an incorrect skeletal alignment in science.
at the time of the film it was as scientifically accurate as any other dinosaur in the series

and it was actually one of the first depictions of spinosaurus with the "long snout" as opposed to the allosaur-like snout of the old restorations
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SuicideDoors on Apr 27, 2017, 08:00:41 PM
Quote from: Omegamorph on Apr 27, 2017, 07:52:38 PM
Quote from: Gate on Apr 27, 2017, 07:11:50 PM
It's not me nerd-raging. It's me recognizing that at the time of the film, the Spinosaur had an incorrect skeletal alignment in science.
at the time of the film it was as scientifically accurate as any other dinosaur in the series

In your estimate how accurate is T-Rex then? Should she (he) have beat Spinosaurus in JP3?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 27, 2017, 08:10:32 PM
Quote from: SuicideDoors on Apr 27, 2017, 08:00:41 PM
In your estimate how accurate is T-Rex then? Should she (he) have beat Spinosaurus in JP3?
At the time of JPIII, there were as many inaccuracies/speculations in T.rex as there were in Spinosaurus. Broken wrists, etc


Who wins is a matter of who wrote the film. In real life, the two probably would not have fought at all and would have left after a brief skirmish or show of roars. In real life, T.rex wouldn't have left the big meal it had at disposal and in real life Spinosaurus wouldn't have chased the guys throughout the entire island etc etc
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Apr 27, 2017, 09:05:25 PM
Animals are animals, they'll avoid conflict if there's a risk of injury.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Apr 28, 2017, 03:52:22 AM
The Rex and Spino were never alive at the same time. Another reason I enjoy the (Mostly Cretaceus) Jurassic Park
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: windebieste on Apr 28, 2017, 04:49:25 AM
Quote from: Gate on Apr 28, 2017, 03:52:22 AM
The Rex and Spino were never alive at the same time. Another reason I enjoy the (Mostly Cretaceus) Jurassic Park

I've worked on video games that state otherwise.   :P

-Windebieste.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on May 03, 2017, 06:54:26 PM
When I thought that nobody could improve this meme

(https://i2.wp.com/bloody-disgusting.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/blum.gif?zoom=1.5625&resize=619%2C373)

they come with this gem 8)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=40Xnpdwknko
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on May 03, 2017, 07:17:47 PM
Quote from: windebieste on Apr 28, 2017, 04:49:25 AM
Quote from: Gate on Apr 28, 2017, 03:52:22 AM
The Rex and Spino were never alive at the same time. Another reason I enjoy the (Mostly Cretaceus) Jurassic Park

I've worked on video games that state otherwise.   :P

-Windebieste.
I can't tell if you're just trying to be cheeky.

The Tyrannosaurus and Spinosaurus were 32 million years apart.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 03, 2017, 07:28:21 PM
He was obviously being facetious.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Infected on May 04, 2017, 08:54:29 PM
Trust me if i say Pratt is gonna ride Blue (that raptor) he is gonna git all Dinorider all up in this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 04, 2017, 09:46:14 PM
Yeah, Pratt certainly gave Blue a look at the end that said "I want to ride ya, bruh." ;) :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on May 05, 2017, 03:36:23 AM
My main issue with JPIII is how small it feels compared to the first two, and it doesn't have much of a satisfying ending... it wraps everything up a bit too conveniently.

Also, you kind of expect something to happen to the Spino in the end after it took out the Rex. Instead he just kind of waddles away after the big river scene. The Raptors ganging up and taking him out would have been a really nice inverse of the first film's ending where the big predator takes care of the little ones, allowing the heroes to escape.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on May 05, 2017, 05:22:32 AM
Quote from: Gilfryd on May 05, 2017, 03:36:23 AM
My main issue with JPIII is how small it feels compared to the first two, and it doesn't have much of a satisfying ending... it wraps everything up a bit too conveniently.

Also, you kind of expect something to happen to the Spino in the end after it took out the Rex. Instead he just kind of waddles away after the big river scene. The Raptors ganging up and taking him out would have been a really nice inverse of the first film's ending where the big predator takes care of the little ones, allowing the heroes to escape.
wasn't that one of the alternate endings? i just hate that they split up ellie and grant and that the island seems completely different
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 05, 2017, 10:53:21 AM
Indeed, that was the original planned ending and it would have been an awesome sight
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on May 05, 2017, 11:43:13 AM
Don't forget annoying Charlie dancing to Barney during the riversequence... whoever thought that would work should work on cartoons for three year olds
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 05, 2017, 12:32:23 PM
The main gripe I have with JP3 is Alan Grant's character arc resets. Completely.

When we first see him he's having trouble communicating with a child.
He accepts money from a "rich" person to help fund his dig-site.
Then he gets stuck on an island full of dinosaurs with a kid to look after.

Give me a break.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on May 05, 2017, 12:48:12 PM
^Indeed. His character traits were nothing like JP, save for his survival instincts.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PierreVW on May 05, 2017, 09:08:05 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 05, 2017, 12:32:23 PM
The main gripe I have with JP3 is Alan Grant's character arc resets. Completely.

When we first see him he's having trouble communicating with a child.
He accepts money from a "rich" person to help fund his dig-site.
Then he gets stuck on an island full of dinosaurs with a kid to look after.

Give me a break.

I agree completely.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on May 06, 2017, 04:12:57 PM
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=919931037
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 10, 2017, 11:48:16 AM
https://twitter.com/FilmBayona/status/862213532074614784


https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/862210555884568580
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on May 10, 2017, 01:49:45 PM
Quote from: ace3g on May 10, 2017, 11:48:16 AM
https://twitter.com/FilmBayona/status/862213532074614784


https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/862210555884568580
:D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 22, 2017, 02:42:07 PM
Quote from: Omegamorph on Apr 27, 2017, 11:30:49 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Apr 27, 2017, 10:55:09 AM
I'm fine with the 'clash of the titans' sequence, it looks great and it's exciting. The "Pteranodon" on the other hand... no. Just no. Terrible designs, dodgy effects, no trace of plausibility.
Dude the Pteranodon silhouette on the bridge and the Pteranodon turning its head towards Grant as the other two pick on Billy on the river are literally the best scenes in the film

I concur. It was fresh, original, and well-paced. The Clash of the Titans sequence was so stupid. Multi-ton animals do not move that fast, not to mention, it was far too early in the film for such a battle to take place. It would've been better to have them square off briefly, with the Spinosaurus standing its ground and scaring off the smaller Rex with its size then have them fight towards the end.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on May 22, 2017, 05:12:04 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 22, 2017, 02:42:07 PM
Quote from: Omegamorph on Apr 27, 2017, 11:30:49 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Apr 27, 2017, 10:55:09 AM
I'm fine with the 'clash of the titans' sequence, it looks great and it's exciting. The "Pteranodon" on the other hand... no. Just no. Terrible designs, dodgy effects, no trace of plausibility.
Dude the Pteranodon silhouette on the bridge and the Pteranodon turning its head towards Grant as the other two pick on Billy on the river are literally the best scenes in the film

I concur. It was fresh, original, and well-paced. The Clash of the Titans sequence was so stupid. Multi-ton animals do not move that fast, not to mention, it was far too early in the film for such a battle to take place. It would've been better to have them square off briefly, with the Spinosaurus standing its ground and scaring off the smaller Rex with its size then have them fight towards the end.

We don't really know how they moved, there's no living parallel. Today's terrestrial multi-tonners are all quadrupedal herbivores with no day-to-day predation pressures as adults. They rarely need to move particularly fast, and much of their energy goes towards digesting tough plant matter.

It does stand to reason that energy/musculature/cooling constraints would make a giant dinosaur slower than smaller relatives, and Jack Horner has suggested that a giant biped would need to move more cautiously as tripping over could cause serious injuries. But in absolute terms, it's another of those things that we just can't know. It's been a while since I watched Jurassic Park 3, but I don't remember the movement looking totally implausible.

I think I agree with your suggestions about the timing within the film though. A fight between the predators to close the movie might be a bit too similar to the first film, but probably beats having the Spinosaurus just wander off as in the finished product.

But the Pteranodon? An animal whose name literally means "wing without tooth", portrayed with teeth and the magical ability to fly carrying much of its bodyweight? I love the aviary sequence in the book, it's creepy and convincing, but the JP3 sequence can chortle my balls. Even leaving aside the authenticity, which after Jurassic World seems like a slightly moot point for the series, I just really hated the creature design and some of the effects. That said, the build-up to the Pteranodon's introduction is great, and as in most of JP3 the cinematography is fantastic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 22, 2017, 08:26:43 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on May 22, 2017, 05:12:04 PM
Quote from: DoomRulz on May 22, 2017, 02:42:07 PM
Quote from: Omegamorph on Apr 27, 2017, 11:30:49 AM
Quote from: Vertigo on Apr 27, 2017, 10:55:09 AM
I'm fine with the 'clash of the titans' sequence, it looks great and it's exciting. The "Pteranodon" on the other hand... no. Just no. Terrible designs, dodgy effects, no trace of plausibility.
Dude the Pteranodon silhouette on the bridge and the Pteranodon turning its head towards Grant as the other two pick on Billy on the river are literally the best scenes in the film

I concur. It was fresh, original, and well-paced. The Clash of the Titans sequence was so stupid. Multi-ton animals do not move that fast, not to mention, it was far too early in the film for such a battle to take place. It would've been better to have them square off briefly, with the Spinosaurus standing its ground and scaring off the smaller Rex with its size then have them fight towards the end.

We don't really know how they moved, there's no living parallel. Today's terrestrial multi-tonners are all quadrupedal herbivores with no day-to-day predation pressures as adults. They rarely need to move particularly fast, and much of their energy goes towards digesting tough plant matter.

It does stand to reason that energy/musculature/cooling constraints would make a giant dinosaur slower than smaller relatives, and Jack Horner has suggested that a giant biped would need to move more cautiously as tripping over could cause serious injuries. But in absolute terms, it's another of those things that we just can't know. It's been a while since I watched Jurassic Park 3, but I don't remember the movement looking totally implausible.

I think I agree with your suggestions about the timing within the film though. A fight between the predators to close the movie might be a bit too similar to the first film, but probably beats having the Spinosaurus just wander off as in the finished product.

But the Pteranodon? An animal whose name literally means "wing without tooth", portrayed with teeth and the magical ability to fly carrying much of its bodyweight? I love the aviary sequence in the book, it's creepy and convincing, but the JP3 sequence can chortle my balls. Even leaving aside the authenticity, which after Jurassic World seems like a slightly moot point for the series, I just really hated the creature design and some of the effects. That said, the build-up to the Pteranodon's introduction is great, and as in most of JP3 the cinematography is fantastic.

Here you go:

http://youtu.be/u8NA7IQMf_Q?t=2m9s

Given what we know of musculature placement in large theropods like T.rex, there's no way in hell it's going to zip around like that. It did the same thing in Jurassic World when fighting Indominus, who is also guilty of breaking the same rules. The way the T.rex moved in the first JP seemed much more plausible, minus the jeep chase.

I'm torn on your complaint about the aviary sequence. I'll harp on lack of science in the films until I'm blue in the face, but at the same time, here was a scene that was totally new for the franchise in that it was a new creature and for a film that was quite lousy, it stands out quite a bit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on May 22, 2017, 09:52:46 PM
The movement still looks alright to me - the rex isn't even technically running at any point, as far as I can see. Maybe a little light-footed and inertia-proof in a few frames. But Tyrannosaurus movement is a notoriously contentious subject, the Wikipedia section on 'locomotion' runs to nearly 2000 words. It's very hard to study for any extinct animal without living parallels, really.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on May 22, 2017, 10:04:54 PM
The Rex / Spino in JP3 do not move any faster or quicker than the Rexes in JP 1 and 2. If you buy into what the Rex does in San Diego there should be no issue with the fight scene in 3
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 23, 2017, 04:34:34 AM
No, it was definitely moving more gracefully than the Rex in JP. Maybe on par with the Bull Rex in TLW at the end, but it still felt off to me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on May 23, 2017, 10:30:36 AM
It looked really fake in Jurassic World though, way too smooth and lightboned, as if there was almost no mass to it whatsoever. It really throws me out of the scene when I watch it, they should have really noticed that it isn't looking "natural" at all and not on par with JP 1.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 23, 2017, 11:41:24 PM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on May 23, 2017, 10:30:36 AM
It looked really fake in Jurassic World though, way too smooth and lightboned, as if there was almost no mass to it whatsoever. It really throws me out of the scene when I watch it, they should have really noticed that it isn't looking "natural" at all and not on par with JP 1.

I agree. Didn't help that the CG wasn't all that great to begin with.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 24, 2017, 01:17:01 AM
https://twitter.com/Collider/status/867053881863405569
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on May 24, 2017, 01:33:15 AM
June 22, 2018 :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on May 24, 2017, 02:32:22 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on May 24, 2017, 01:33:15 AM
June 22, 2018 :o
Christ, so far away.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on May 24, 2017, 09:06:58 PM
major plotpoints leaked today... I don't have them... I want this one to be a bit of a surprise.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on May 24, 2017, 10:40:58 PM
I'm avoiding any and all spoilers. The only thing I know about this film, even remotely plot wise, is that Ian Malcolm is returning (still surprised about that).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on May 25, 2017, 07:16:10 AM
If these rumors are true
Spoiler
another big character is making a return
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on May 26, 2017, 12:19:09 AM
Quote from: Xan21 on May 25, 2017, 07:16:10 AM
If these rumors are true
Spoiler
another big character is making a return
[close]
who?? could you tell me what the leaks were? iv been hearing about them but i have not seen a thing
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on May 26, 2017, 01:38:08 AM
Quote from: frenchfries on May 26, 2017, 12:19:09 AM
Quote from: Xan21 on May 25, 2017, 07:16:10 AM
If these rumors are true
Spoiler
another big character is making a return
[close]
who?? could you tell me what the leaks were? iv been hearing about them but i have not seen a thing
I won't be happy unless its
Spoiler
Grant
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on May 26, 2017, 04:18:50 AM
That was my original guess, but I was thinking more like...

Spoiler
Julianne Moore as Malcolm's now wife :o
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on May 26, 2017, 05:02:13 AM
I'm thinking prob dodson. Hopefully someone fills me in on these leaks, plz someone let me know
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on May 26, 2017, 06:40:06 AM
I was staying away from these leaks but someone posted a less spoilery synopsis of them... Universal acted very fast and got the initial leaks removed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on May 26, 2017, 10:26:11 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on May 26, 2017, 06:40:06 AM
I was staying away from these leaks but someone posted a less spoilery synopsis of them... Universal acted very fast and got the initial leaks removed.
Uni really stepped up their game, because i can't find squat on this synopsis that has been floating around.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 10, 2017, 02:47:13 PM
https://twitter.com/FilmBayona/status/873497674611339264
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: nanison on Jun 12, 2017, 01:26:41 AM
I'e heard there's gonna be zombiesaurs as the main threat now. Can't wait to see them feeding on braaaiiiiinnnsss
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 17, 2017, 05:25:51 PM
https://twitter.com/screencrushnews/status/876127685281550338
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jun 18, 2017, 03:01:08 AM
^ Gets better and better... :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Jun 22, 2017, 06:43:11 PM
http://www.cbr.com/jurassic-world-2-title-revealed/

The new films title is

Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jun 22, 2017, 10:32:13 PM
Hmmm... Sounds good!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Jun 23, 2017, 02:57:51 AM
it rolls off the tongue nicely.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: NeoXenoPred on Jun 23, 2017, 07:21:09 AM
Sounds great! Hope they return the Animatronic Dinosaur and maybe a new hybrid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 23, 2017, 07:54:30 AM
Love it!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Jun 23, 2017, 11:18:48 PM
Quote from: NeoXenoPred on Jun 23, 2017, 07:21:09 AM
Sounds great! Hope they return the Animatronic Dinosaur and maybe a new hybrid.
I think it is pretty much confirmed that there will be animatronics. Colin in a recent interview talked about how he wrote the script with animatronics in mind and JA bayona shared a pic a while back of people with animatronic controls.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: skhellter on Jun 23, 2017, 11:44:59 PM
Transformers Park: Rise of the Fallen Kingdom



kinda silly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 24, 2017, 01:13:48 AM
Quote from: skhellter on Jun 23, 2017, 11:44:59 PM
Transformers Park: Rise of the Fallen Kingdom



kinda silly.

Will it turn out that cloned dinos helped King Arthur in battle?  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jul 03, 2017, 09:13:45 PM
Alan DeGeneres with..... big spoiler

Spoiler
(https://tweakers.net/ext/f/jNpw4AMhY18xiTvv2AK0UN5z/full.jpg)
[close]

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Jul 03, 2017, 09:19:22 PM
Sweet
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 03, 2017, 09:49:01 PM
Yes!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jul 09, 2017, 05:51:02 AM
https://twitter.com/FilmBayona/status/883925398358118400

https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/884115156724330496
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jul 20, 2017, 09:10:23 AM
I made this little doc. Hope you enjoy!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOPqWe4Iulc&t=455s
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Oct 13, 2017, 01:56:17 AM
From the Brand License Expo

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DLyH-NFW4AE3DSL.jpg:orig)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Oct 13, 2017, 03:09:18 AM
:o :o :o :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master Chief on Oct 13, 2017, 02:27:50 PM
Rexy!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Whos_Nick on Oct 14, 2017, 02:00:53 AM
According to guy who is at the show, the trailer is dropping December 13th
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 17, 2017, 08:28:21 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWyYpDYLxt8&t=78s
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master Chief on Nov 22, 2017, 05:33:09 PM
I want a baby raptor.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CN3my0VuhuU
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Nov 22, 2017, 06:02:57 PM
Every kid will want a baby blue raptor... and a
Spoiler
baby indoraptor
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr. Xenomorph on Nov 22, 2017, 07:49:11 PM
I remember that was part of the first novel. Dodgson had a boardroom meeting and the board gave him the go ahead to utilize Nedry after he brought up the financial potential of cloned baby dinosaurs. Glad they're getting back into the novels again.

The first Jurassic Park is probably my favorite movie of all time, so I love what they're doing with the new ones.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Nov 22, 2017, 10:55:32 PM
Quote from: Mr. Xenomorph on Nov 22, 2017, 07:49:11 PM
I remember that was part of the first novel. Dodgson had a boardroom meeting and the board gave him the go ahead to utilize Nedry after he brought up the financial potential of cloned baby dinosaurs. Glad they're getting back into the novels again.

I just wish Crichton was still around to actually write the script.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Nov 23, 2017, 12:21:59 PM
Aww how cute!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Scorpio on Nov 23, 2017, 10:36:47 PM
The baby raptor in the original is cute.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi27.tinypic.com%2F10p25au.png&hash=c7679173b1f8aaf6ca954634ee661e845d6afc62)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Nov 24, 2017, 12:46:47 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fpre00.deviantart.net%2F8f1b%2Fth%2Fpre%2Fi%2F2013%2F205%2F8%2F6%2Faww____so_cute____by_nicksfluffyshit-d6eyttf.jpg&hash=8dc769d994f137ea0b512b6947896c97d1f0df26)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Nov 28, 2017, 01:14:57 PM
Trailer arrives this Thursday

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lz6ODgk6xQ


This site still has the trailer announcement up. (http://jurassicoutpost.com/hold-butts-first-jurassic-world-fallen-kingdom-trailer-arrives-thursday/) -

2nd edit - Looks like all trailer announcements have been taken down. MC
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Nov 28, 2017, 02:00:29 PM
I'm really looking forward to this one, see what Bayona can do with this type of project.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Nov 28, 2017, 07:19:45 PM
Colin Trevorrow posted the trailer and it was still taken down. Wut?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Nov 28, 2017, 07:21:05 PM
Jeesh what a fail of Universal to let this slip a week too early...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Dec 04, 2017, 12:57:49 AM
wow!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=266EI7hdjFs
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: skhellter on Dec 04, 2017, 03:03:21 AM
yet another dino stampede.




yawn.



call me when they have weaponized dinosaurs fighting drug dealers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Dec 04, 2017, 03:54:33 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Dec 04, 2017, 12:57:49 AM
wow!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=266EI7hdjFs
😳😳😳😳😍
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Dec 04, 2017, 04:13:58 AM



more footage was found during the football game!^^^
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Dec 04, 2017, 06:06:54 AM
Quote from: frenchfries on Dec 04, 2017, 04:13:58 AM
https://www.instagram.com/p/BcQrtd1lxXm/


more footage was found during the football game!^^^

Didn't realize we could embed instagram links... I would have been doing that a long time ago instead of going into the "view page info" get the image link,etc

https://twitter.com/joblocom/status/937561247603744771
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Dec 04, 2017, 09:45:22 AM
Really excited for this. Love the JP series
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Dec 04, 2017, 10:51:00 AM
So excited for this!

Loving the footage so far!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Dec 04, 2017, 01:04:08 PM
Wow WTF was the thing that comes out at 0:05 ?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Dec 04, 2017, 02:45:57 PM
Quote from: BigDaddyJohn on Dec 04, 2017, 01:04:08 PM
Wow WTF was the thing that comes out at 0:05 ?

Looks like a Baryonyx to me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 04, 2017, 03:45:20 PM
it looks nothing like a Baryonyx.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Dec 04, 2017, 05:05:21 PM
It looks everything like a Baryonyx.

Edit: No, really. I'm trolling. It looks like an Albertosaur, except I'm fairly certain I see graspy hands.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Dec 04, 2017, 05:09:42 PM
It has a similar look to the spinosaurus  which a baryonyx resembles. The grasping hands helps me think that. That's what it looks like to me.

Could be the Indoraptor ?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Dec 04, 2017, 05:44:55 PM
Quote from: Russ840 on Dec 04, 2017, 05:09:42 PM

Could be the Indoraptor ?

I thought about that yes
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Dec 04, 2017, 05:45:47 PM
https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/937720077931175937
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 04, 2017, 05:47:55 PM
Quote from: Gate on Dec 04, 2017, 05:05:21 PM
It looks like an Albertosaur
No, it doesn't. A Tyrannosaurid skull has a specific silhouette and that thing doesn't have it

Quote from: Alien³ on Dec 04, 2017, 05:45:47 PM
https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/937720077931175937
Really? So now they're handing out random names to dinos without even looking at the skeletons?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Dec 04, 2017, 05:57:37 PM
I thought it looked like a baryonyx. Glad he is finally in a JP movie. Wish was used, like planned, in 3. 

Omegamorph, what about it doesn't look right to you ?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 04, 2017, 06:04:05 PM
Quote from: Russ840 on Dec 04, 2017, 05:57:37 PM
Omegamorph, what about it doesn't look right to you ?
the fact that it doesn't look like a spinosaurid at all, let alone baryonyx

I mean I get the fact they've thrown contemporary scientific accuracy out of the window... but at this point I guess they can put a big ceratopsid in the film and call it 'Herrerasaurus'?

At this point I hope it's unfinished footage, or the video quality distorted the image enough to give that effect
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Dec 04, 2017, 06:05:25 PM
Wait to see it in full!

That clip is super low quality.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Dec 04, 2017, 06:07:24 PM
Quote from: Omegamorph on Dec 04, 2017, 06:04:05 PM
Quote from: Russ840 on Dec 04, 2017, 05:57:37 PM
Omegamorph, what about it doesn't look right to you ?
the fact that it doesn't look like a spinosaurid at all, let alone baryonyx

I mean I get the fact they've thrown contemporary scientific accuracy out of the window... but at this point I guess they can put a big ceratopsid in the film and call it 'Herrerasaurus'?

At this point I hope it's unfinished footage, or the video quality distorted the image enough to give that effect

To me it screams spinosaurid. Hence why I thought Baryonyx. The elongated crocodilian snout and big hands did it for me.

The footage is of a poor quality so a better look will help.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Dec 04, 2017, 07:18:09 PM
Bear in mind the last film's trailers showed different layers of CG each time they had a new preview. The Mosasaur looked vastly worse originally than it did in the final product. But really, I don't know where some of y'all are getting the crocodilian snout from looking at this clip. It looks more like an Alberto-Cerato head.

(https://i.imgur.com/PIQoeyt.png)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Dec 04, 2017, 07:45:41 PM
Well I clearly see a long snout and I identified it as Baryonyx. I was right. At first I thought it was a Spino lol.  Envelope in the vid there that you posted. The still clip. I see Spinosaurid.

Your not wrong about the CGI layers getting updates though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Dec 04, 2017, 07:46:25 PM
From that angle, it literally looks like 60% of theropods I know of. I get that he confirmed it, but it doesn't look so great thus far.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Dec 04, 2017, 07:52:39 PM
I don't agree but hey. Everyone sees things slightly differently. I can't wait to see the full trailer.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Dec 04, 2017, 07:58:56 PM
Baryonyx looks freaky... hope we get to see Maisie and Lockwood Manor in the full trailer... and Ian Malcolm

Better quality teaser 2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dM6nwi3Vb3I
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Dec 04, 2017, 08:57:09 PM
So glad colin confirmed that it is a baryonyx. The angle makes the snout appear smaller but it was clearly a bary to me in the first place
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Dec 04, 2017, 08:58:41 PM
I think the other 'special' one it got confused with appears later in the film
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Dec 04, 2017, 09:20:11 PM
Just checked what the Baryonyx is about according to some studies on the net, it's a big fella ! Didn't imagined it this big !
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Dec 04, 2017, 10:25:56 PM
Large Theropod but smaller than a rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Dec 05, 2017, 12:31:59 AM
I've been wanting to see Baryonyx in Jurassic Park ever since seeing the map icon in the first film. Or in any form of screen media after seeing the skeleton at the Natural History Museum. I'll give them the benefit of the doubt for now, as that's a very brief glimpse in the teaser, but it doesn't give me much hope that the rest of the footage is just as stuffed full of dull grey anachro-saurs as JW was.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Dec 05, 2017, 02:05:30 AM
If DoomRulz is reading:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.pinimg.com%2F736x%2Fac%2Fdf%2F18%2Facdf183664f94711e29dd55cc7b2e3b4--classic-toys-jurassic-park.jpg&hash=0c149eb001edd5b7cc57676fdac9a7ee9a8f924c)

;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Dec 05, 2017, 06:14:59 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBHTIiBmAzc
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Jacku on Dec 05, 2017, 01:05:57 PM
Looks like all out CGI again  :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Dec 05, 2017, 01:38:24 PM
I hate that eye at the end... it's so annoying looks like that movie DINOSAUR... it's lazy... and the Trex WAS animatronic but they poured CGI sauce all over it again just like with that little Raptor. Well at least it fits in with the previous film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Dec 05, 2017, 02:00:31 PM
I really want to see what the indo-raptor will look like and how his abilities will be portrayed. Considering Raptors are very clever in the movies, how more genetic modifications will affect their intelligence, will they be smarter than the indominus ? Or will it be tuned down a bit in order to not be too much like human intelligence ?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Dec 05, 2017, 02:13:28 PM
Quote from: Jacku on Dec 05, 2017, 01:05:57 PM
Looks like all out CGI again  :-\

There has been set pics showing the Rex is an animatronic. Prob touched up with CGI.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Jacku on Dec 05, 2017, 03:29:37 PM
Quote from: Russ840 on Dec 05, 2017, 02:13:28 PM
Quote from: Jacku on Dec 05, 2017, 01:05:57 PM
Looks like all out CGI again  :-\

There has been set pics showing the Rex is an animatronic. Prob touched up with CGI.

Ah well. Also the whole herd running down the mountain crashing into that log is just too much CGI for me. I know a volcano and dinosaurs running down a hill would probably be CGI anyway, but it looks like they've just added the actors into a CG environment. The log and the thing they were hiding behind just look like weightless things that aren't really there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Dec 05, 2017, 06:13:02 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DQTPXXJWkAACaLe.jpg:large)

https://t.co/jynjNi9deh
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Dec 05, 2017, 06:37:26 PM
Excellent. Gonna be great to have a medium sized predator running around
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Dec 05, 2017, 07:41:48 PM
Cool Baryonyx still... but standing under a fall of lava is a bit ridiculous..
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SuicideDoors on Dec 05, 2017, 08:01:26 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Dec 05, 2017, 06:14:59 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBHTIiBmAzc

f**k that looks awesome. As I typed that I completely forgot Chris Pratt said it's gonna be awesome. He's right it's going to be awesome!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Whos_Nick on Dec 05, 2017, 08:03:00 PM
I like the atmosphere in that image
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Dec 05, 2017, 08:36:27 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Dec 05, 2017, 06:13:02 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DQTPXXJWkAACaLe.jpg:large)

https://t.co/jynjNi9deh
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmemegenerator.net%2Fimg%2Finstances%2F500x%2F67153831%2Fdaaaammmnnn.jpg&hash=c22df735064c9d73e10d3bd2662ce760d888e741)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Dec 06, 2017, 12:07:24 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZ3GlUDdrqg
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Dec 06, 2017, 09:09:30 AM
(https://d3uf2ssic990td.cloudfront.net/images/4919/da88f308-d487-460f-b402-4e450a9ebe20/DQTO3NEW0AAlK6R.jpg-large.jpeg)

A lot of new footage / behind the scenes stuff!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FY0-lIEm4IU
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Dec 06, 2017, 07:46:32 PM
(https://media.giphy.com/media/uV63K90eIDq5q/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Jango1201 on Dec 06, 2017, 11:26:18 PM
First time in 20 years im excited for a JP movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Dec 06, 2017, 11:46:08 PM
I like that remix of the theme music.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: kwisatz on Dec 07, 2017, 01:00:11 AM
I just cant stand Chris Pratt.

Guess i have to skip this one too--
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Dec 07, 2017, 01:25:07 AM
Yes. Everything, yes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Dec 07, 2017, 01:55:08 AM
HQ

(https://img15.hostingpics.net/pics/284849jwfk2.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Dec 07, 2017, 06:07:04 AM
Quote from: kwisatz on Dec 07, 2017, 01:00:11 AM
I just cant stand Chris Pratt.

Guess i have to skip this one too--
what why? he's like one of the most charismatic people around. man am I super excited for this film. Animatronics check, Malcolm check, great cinematography check! this movie will be awesome
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Dec 07, 2017, 09:08:34 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Dec 07, 2017, 01:55:08 AM
HQ

(https://img15.hostingpics.net/pics/284849jwfk2.jpg)
That image makes me think Jurassic park meets the Terminator.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Dec 07, 2017, 06:03:53 PM
Goldblum is gonna have such a short role, like Hammond in TLW. There's nothing they could do to make Malcolm go back to the island.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Jacku on Dec 08, 2017, 01:57:18 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vn9mMeWcgoM (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vn9mMeWcgoM)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Dec 08, 2017, 02:16:58 AM
Looks pretty decent. Nice to see that Pratt still has more chemistry with the raptors than he does with Howard. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Jacku on Dec 08, 2017, 02:19:51 AM
I really hope the volcano eruption is like a first act/early second act thing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Dec 08, 2017, 02:23:09 AM
And I'm guessing Sorna isn't exploding.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Dec 08, 2017, 03:10:51 AM
Allosaurus?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi63.tinypic.com%2F2lc9o54.jpg&hash=4eaac05ef0512bdd676c6dbefa8e04928e5ece1d)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr.Turok on Dec 08, 2017, 03:13:11 AM
I couldn't help but laugh my ass off when the Carnotaurus came in to act as the big bad only for ol Rexy to rush right in and break its head because for years people had asked for Carnotaurus to be one of the big ones that chased the heroes around....only surprise! Its T-Rex again!  :laugh:

Still, the idea is quite a bit......new.....for me but I am taking it in slowly and feeling optimistic about it. I wonder if they are going to move these dinos to Isla Sorna? 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Dec 08, 2017, 03:24:21 AM
Quote from: Jacku on Dec 08, 2017, 02:19:51 AM
I really hope the volcano eruption is like a first act/early second act thing.

All of the shots in this trailer are from the first half of the movie.

Oh boy it's gonna be awesome! Like what the big screen was made for.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Jacku on Dec 08, 2017, 03:27:07 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Dec 08, 2017, 03:24:21 AM
Quote from: Jacku on Dec 08, 2017, 02:19:51 AM
I really hope the volcano eruption is like a first act/early second act thing.

All of the shots in this trailer are from the first half of the movie.

Oh good. I hope future trailers don't ruin entire scenes from the later half like the War for the Planet of the Apes trailers.
In that case, if the plot is about rescuing dinosaurs from a volcano, they seem to have failed early on.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SuicideDoors on Dec 08, 2017, 05:03:21 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Dec 08, 2017, 03:24:21 AM
Quote from: Jacku on Dec 08, 2017, 02:19:51 AM
I really hope the volcano eruption is like a first act/early second act thing.

All of the shots in this trailer are from the first half of the movie.

Oh boy it's gonna be awesome! Like what the big screen was made for.

That's a relief then.

I'm going to be first in line but have to hold my hands up and confess to being a little bit disappointed by the trailer. Rexy stealing the trailer with that takedown was absolutely grand but I didn't like how anything felt remotely necessary from a story standpoint. But it's only a 2-minute trailer so I'll shut up.

Its going to be great still.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: theiss2003 on Dec 08, 2017, 05:53:16 AM
Story makes absolutely no sense at all IMO.

Why would anybody take the obvious risks to catch and rescue all those dinosaurs when there is
a) a second dinosaur ecosystem established on Sorna since TLW and
b) you could easily clone the Dinosaurs again.

???
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Dec 08, 2017, 06:07:15 AM
None of the JP movies other than the first movie are any good. After Jurassic World, I give up hope on this franchise having a good movie again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: reecebomb on Dec 08, 2017, 06:22:12 AM
Looks retarded, wouldn't be surprised if this made by Michael Bay who's main goal is to top the King Kong stampede scene in it's ridiculousness. Humans making friends of raptors and T-Rexes makes this kinda hard to appeal to adults, though I wouldn't think much of it as a child either. Another throwaway dino cgi-cartoon for the... I don't really know who's it's for.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Dec 08, 2017, 06:31:29 AM
It's for me at least. I can't wait.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: reecebomb on Dec 08, 2017, 07:03:45 AM
Quote from: Russ840 on Dec 08, 2017, 06:31:29 AM
It's for me at least. I can't wait.

I would think that Jurassic Park is for me too, but I'm not going to gobble up whatever crap is the result of wasted opportunity and millions. I guess some (a lot these days) people don't give damn about the quality as long as you see some dinos in JP movie and some xenos in Covenant. Wild guess, you were probably fine with Covenant. Jurassic World was enjoyable as fast food entertainment goes, but in no way it can be called a good movie. This trailer however looks a lot worse somehow, it's pure shitfest. Sad thing is I will probably see it either way because I love dinos, and they know that people will see it regardless, if the film is good or not.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Dec 08, 2017, 07:25:13 AM
I like Covenant for the most part. Its not without problems. No film is.

I loved Jurassic world. I think it is a very good movie. I would say its a quality movie. I like the meta touches in there.

I think this movie is going to entertain me.  I am excited for it.




Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: reecebomb on Dec 08, 2017, 07:55:29 AM
Quote from: Russ840 on Dec 08, 2017, 07:25:13 AM
I like Covenant for the most part. Its not without problems. No film is.

I loved Jurassic world. I think it is a very good movie. I would say its a quality movie. I like the meta touches in there.

I think this movie is going to entertain me.  I am excited for it.

I think there are many films out there that are perfect or let's say near perfect, Alien for one, it's  a world apart from Covenant.  That of course doesn't mean that the movie has to be perfect or even good to be entertaining, because the film industry would have collapsed completely if this were the case. Lucky for Hollywood, people are easily entertained, and often the shallower  content, the more easily it can be digested by the geneal audience who's attention span is decreasing by the day (not aimed at you).
I guess we both can agree that Jurassic World isn't on the same level as JP, right?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rudiger on Dec 08, 2017, 07:59:12 AM
That looks terrible.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Dec 08, 2017, 08:08:55 AM
Quote from: reecebomb on Dec 08, 2017, 07:55:29 AM
Quote from: Russ840 on Dec 08, 2017, 07:25:13 AM
I like Covenant for the most part. Its not without problems. No film is.

I loved Jurassic world. I think it is a very good movie. I would say its a quality movie. I like the meta touches in there.

I think this movie is going to entertain me.  I am excited for it.

I think there are many films out there that are perfect or let's say near perfect, Alien for one, it's  a world apart from Covenant.  That of course doesn't mean that the movie has to be perfect or even good to be entertaining, because the film industry would have collapsed completely if this were the case. Lucky for Hollywood, people are easily entertained, and often the shallower  content, the more easily it can be digested by the geneal audience who's attention span is decreasing by the day (not aimed at you).
I guess we both can agree that Jurassic World isn't on the same level as JP, right?

Absolutely.

JP is one of my top 5 movies. For me there is not much on its level.

I would say that Alien is as close to perfect, for me, as a film gets. ( Its my all time fav ).

Like you say. A film does not have to be perfect to be good. I think JW has much more about it than the average blockbuster. It ticked all the boxes for me.

Regarding this movie. It one trailer. Clearly it's not working for you but don't judge of 1 trailer. Give the film the chance that you want to give it without a negative bias and you may Be suprised. That's always my attitude.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Dec 08, 2017, 08:29:38 AM
I'm not massively versed in the genre of dinosaur films (JP is about it) but I like they're doing something a little different (for JP ASAIK) with the whole eruption angle. It's not just a retread in terms of the broad-story.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Dec 08, 2017, 08:41:56 AM
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Dec 08, 2017, 08:29:38 AM
I'm not massively versed in the genre of dinosaur films (JP is about it) but I like they're doing something a little different (for JP ASAIK) with the whole eruption angle. It's not just a retread in terms of the broad-story.

Totally.  I like where they are going with this. I have faith.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Dec 08, 2017, 09:05:59 AM
It's a rescue mission. You'll love it. There are some juicy dinosaurs that need to be rescued from an exploding island.

I'm actually digging this plot.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: skhellter on Dec 08, 2017, 09:10:08 AM
I didnt care for the trailer. That was not well edited.
And yeah, i totally want to see the feel good dinosaur movie
where dozens of dinos drown horribly after falling off a cliff.
Now that's quality entertainment.
Anyone remember when these films werent aiming to be depressing af?  :D



But out of all the criticisms that you can level at the film..
this is the silliest one, surely?

Quote from: theiss2003 on Dec 08, 2017, 05:53:16 AM
Story makes absolutely no sense at all IMO.

Why would anybody take the obvious risks to catch and rescue all those dinosaurs when there is
a) a second dinosaur ecosystem established on Sorna since TLW and
b) you could easily clone the Dinosaurs again.

Yeah who gives 2 shits about saving wild animals from a
horrible death by fire, lava, giant boulders falling from the sky or being
suffocated by the sheer amount of volcanic ash in the air?

Who gives a f**k about empathy anymore?  :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
I've seen actual film critics criticizing the movie on this level....
and i feel like it's worth pointing out how weird it is.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Scorpio on Dec 08, 2017, 09:51:42 AM
This looks too much like JW.  The cast does absolutely nothing for me.  Sam Neill and Laura Dern actually have intelligence and charisma.  I love the first movie but the sequels are not much IMO.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: theiss2003 on Dec 08, 2017, 10:03:12 AM
Quote from: theiss2003 on Dec 08, 2017, 05:53:16 AM
Yeah who gives 2 shits about saving wild animals from a
horrible death by fire, lava, giant boulders falling from the sky or being
suffocated by the sheer amount of volcanic ash in the air?

Who gives a f**k about empathy anymore?  :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

Well, it's not that we're speaking about fluffy wombats or koalas or endangered rhinos - the risk of losing the whole team by getting eaten far outweighs the empathy in this one.
BTW: At the end of the day, all those dinosaurs are just manufactured products. They do no have any value in terms of biodiversity here.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: skhellter on Dec 08, 2017, 10:09:08 AM
Do you understand how you're making yourself look? :D

"it's not a fluffy animal, who gives a f**k?"


:laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Dec 08, 2017, 10:20:35 AM
let's quit with the attitude, folks
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: theiss2003 on Dec 08, 2017, 10:30:53 AM
Quote from: skhellter on Dec 08, 2017, 10:09:08 AM
Do you understand how you're making yourself look? :D

"it's not a fluffy animal, who gives a f**k?"


:laugh:

I never said "it's not a fluffy animal, who gives a f**k?".
I do encourage you to read my last post again. Entirely.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Dec 08, 2017, 10:45:47 AM
I will keep my reaction simple:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fvignette2.wikia.nocookie.net%2Fwalkingdead%2Fimages%2F3%2F3f%2FShut-up-and-take-my-money.jpg%2Frevision%2Flatest%2Fscale-to-width-down%2F2000%3Fcb%3D20140829235648&hash=8df11b88811a45ec8611e0d382dd010478bbcaa3)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Dec 08, 2017, 10:47:31 AM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Dec 08, 2017, 10:45:47 AM
I will keep my reaction simple:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fvignette2.wikia.nocookie.net%2Fwalkingdead%2Fimages%2F3%2F3f%2FShut-up-and-take-my-money.jpg%2Frevision%2Flatest%2Fscale-to-width-down%2F2000%3Fcb%3D20140829235648&hash=8df11b88811a45ec8611e0d382dd010478bbcaa3)

And mine
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Dec 08, 2017, 01:16:12 PM
I'm really interested to see what Bayona's work will look like overall. He's a MUCH more talented director than Trevorrow, so that's a good point.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Dec 08, 2017, 03:15:30 PM
Looked quite atrocious... there were nice things but the trailer is edited in the lamest way. The half finished cgi of the stampede bugs me even more and the direction of it(film at lower anglessss!). That whole scene played out like a cartoon... apparantly the whole new cast is dino fodder so they don't feel a need to give them a little time to shine. No Dr Wu, Lockwood, Maisie. No Ted Levine, Rafe Spall, Toby Jones. I think the film deserves a better trailer... uber lame.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Dec 08, 2017, 03:32:29 PM
They will probably be featured in the second one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: reecebomb on Dec 08, 2017, 03:41:18 PM
Quote from: Russ840 on Dec 08, 2017, 08:08:55 AM
Quote from: reecebomb on Dec 08, 2017, 07:55:29 AM
Quote from: Russ840 on Dec 08, 2017, 07:25:13 AM
I like Covenant for the most part. Its not without problems. No film is.

I loved Jurassic world. I think it is a very good movie. I would say its a quality movie. I like the meta touches in there.

I think this movie is going to entertain me.  I am excited for it.

I think there are many films out there that are perfect or let's say near perfect, Alien for one, it's  a world apart from Covenant.  That of course doesn't mean that the movie has to be perfect or even good to be entertaining, because the film industry would have collapsed completely if this were the case. Lucky for Hollywood, people are easily entertained, and often the shallower  content, the more easily it can be digested by the geneal audience who's attention span is decreasing by the day (not aimed at you).
I guess we both can agree that Jurassic World isn't on the same level as JP, right?

Absolutely.

JP is one of my top 5 movies. For me there is not much on its level.

I would say that Alien is as close to perfect, for me, as a film gets. ( Its my all time fav ).

Like you say. A film does not have to be perfect to be good. I think JW has much more about it than the average blockbuster. It ticked all the boxes for me.

Regarding this movie. It one trailer. Clearly it's not working for you but don't judge of 1 trailer. Give the film the chance that you want to give it without a negative bias and you may Be suprised. That's always my attitude.


Ok, at least we both love Alien and JP. But that wasn't really what i meant, the film doesn't even have to be good to have some entertainment value and then there are so films that are so bad they end up being sort of good. That said i guess JW is not too bad next to blockbuster of today and it mostly succeeded what it was set to do, to give the audience some mindless dino fun. It was entertaining for me but i still wouldn't call it a good movie, i'd give it a strong 5 or a weak 6. Jurassic Park was perhaps as much of a sci-fi movie as it was adventure. These sequels are all about over the top set pieces with zero sublety or regards to realism, of course there are room for these types of movies too but many of us need something more than cheap thrills. And i will see it, doubt there is something better dino related coming out soon.


Quote from: BigDaddyJohn on Dec 08, 2017, 01:16:12 PM
I'm really interested to see what Bayona's work will look like overall. He's a MUCH more talented director than Trevorrow, so that's a good point.

That is true, but it seems that it doesn't matter who directs the blockbusters these days, the result is mostly decided by the studio.

Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Dec 08, 2017, 08:29:38 AM
I'm not massively versed in the genre of dinosaur films (JP is about it) but I like they're doing something a little different (for JP ASAIK) with the whole eruption angle. It's not just a retread in terms of the broad-story.


The way i see it, this scenario mainly enables the studio to bring forth a spectacle that is even larger in scale and over the top, something that's not really anything new (the stampede, T-Rex coming to the rescue...) and as we have witnessed from the this trailer, it's just end up being even more ridiculous cartoony cgifest rather than the excitment that has the real power to thrill. Volcano and dinosaurs, pretty awesome but whats next, tornados with dinosaurs in them.
The problem with these unconvincing enourmous set pieces are that they greatly reduce/cheapen the impact of each encounter when a dinosaur appears in the film. I think audience are developing fatigue from the overuse of cgi, none of that is actually impressive anymore, though people still watch it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Dec 08, 2017, 03:48:31 PM
Quote from: BigDaddyJohn on Dec 08, 2017, 01:16:12 PM
I'm really interested to see what Bayona's work will look like overall. He's a MUCH more talented director than Trevorrow, so that's a good point.

That is true, but it seems that it doesn't matter who directs the blockbusters these days, the result is mostly decided by the studio.

[/quote]

Unfortunately it is often like that indeed... But i'm still hoping some of his qualities will be felt in the movie, i don't know why but i want to believe !  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Dec 08, 2017, 04:03:06 PM
Why would you finally unveil a carnotaurus just to kill it off 10 seconds later? Does that not irk anybody else how this new director says he's all about 'suspense' and yet he's had this trailer practically kill any suspense we have. The characters fail to save the dinos. The Carno dies. Goldblum isn't coming to the island. Blue's an alpha male now. 

And then the entire ending scene of the trailer is a total revival of the caravan scene in TLW. That's about the only thing I don't have irks with. Don't get me wrong, I love what I'm seeing. However, what the hell was this trailer trying to purport? Is it trying to have us misidentify the real plot?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Dec 08, 2017, 04:47:25 PM
It's cool to see a Carnotaurus in a mainstream Hollywood movie again since Disney's Dinosaur.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Whos_Nick on Dec 08, 2017, 06:09:52 PM
There were only a couple moments I thought were good in this trailer, but it was really poorly put together. Made it seem like a disaster movie when that is only a small sequence in the film. Whoever cut this trailer needs to be fired.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ratchetcomand on Dec 08, 2017, 06:12:40 PM
Why not move the Dinosaurs to Site B? Whatever happen to that?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Jonesy1974 on Dec 08, 2017, 06:39:52 PM
I thought the trailer was great. Really looking forward to this as I enjoyed Jurassic World.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Dec 08, 2017, 06:48:34 PM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Dec 08, 2017, 06:12:40 PM
Why not move the Dinosaurs to Site B? Whatever happen to that?

Who's to say that's not the plan or that the fate of site B won't be revealed? 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on Dec 08, 2017, 08:58:14 PM
I watched the trailer and felt absolutely nothing. It feels even more underwhelming than Jurassic World. And the most anticlimactic introduction to the Carnotaur that the screenwriters could have come up with.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Dec 09, 2017, 03:57:55 AM
https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/939076156585922561
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PierreVW on Dec 09, 2017, 06:05:16 AM
Looks lame. But I'm still somewhat curious about this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Dec 09, 2017, 11:50:25 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Dec 09, 2017, 03:57:55 AM
https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/939076156585922561

I did have a feeling that this was the case. I think we are going to get a horror style second half with Indoraptors chasing humans round a mansion lol.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr. Xenomorph on Dec 09, 2017, 01:58:23 PM
My inner child is extremely happy after watching that trailer. It's basically Jurassic Park 2: the Chaos continues and series 2 of the first movie's toy line (the Carnotaurus sastrei and Baryonyx were introduced in toy form in Series 2) in movie form. And that is extremely exciting!

I doubt that they're moving the assets to Sorna. The new Jurassic World game is set on Isla Matanceros IIRC. The developers were pretty mum on why the Site A facility wasn't set up on Isla Nublar.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Dec 09, 2017, 03:51:05 PM
It's cool to see that the raptor (bBue) is standing on the JP1 car (probably the one that fell down from the tree with Alan and Tim)

(https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/9832013/Screen_Shot_2017_12_07_at_6.08.58_PM.png)


The Rex scene seems cool, and especially knowing that it's the Rex from JP1 but something, just like Jurassic World, seems off and makes it look too different from the JP1 Rex. I do hope it's not "friendly" like the raptors because that Rex is supposed to be a predator, and was a menace in the JP1 movie. Please no more AVP-esque teaming up.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Dec 09, 2017, 04:44:40 PM
The JW teamup worked though. It wasn't a hamfisted scene. Same for AvP.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr. Xenomorph on Dec 09, 2017, 05:07:02 PM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on Dec 09, 2017, 03:51:05 PM
It's cool to see that the raptor (bBue) is standing on the JP1 car (probably the one that fell down from the tree with Alan and Tim)

(https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/9832013/Screen_Shot_2017_12_07_at_6.08.58_PM.png)


The Rex scene seems cool, and especially knowing that it's the Rex from JP1 but something, just like Jurassic World, seems off and makes it look too different from the JP1 Rex. I do hope it's not "friendly" like the raptors because that Rex is supposed to be a predator, and was a menace in the JP1 movie. Please no more AVP-esque teaming up.

I don't think they'll do a team-up with Rexy. Owen stands still as a statue after Rexy downs the Carnotaurus.

Also, I noticed this:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.collider.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fjurassic-world-poster-variant.jpg&hash=02fe92b820d18850615ecb24d080e5c631bfad79)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: chrisr232007 on Dec 09, 2017, 05:18:21 PM
I don't care what anyone says....its a big blockbuster JP movie with a shit ton of dinosaurs....sign me the hell up haha...I love these movies and I'm just happy we still get big budget dino movies!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Dec 09, 2017, 06:16:31 PM
Trevorrow confirmed all the footage shown in the trailer is from the first 57 minutes.... now I understand why the trailer looks like JP3 and sucks
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Dec 09, 2017, 08:32:36 PM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on Dec 09, 2017, 03:51:05 PM
It's cool to see that the raptor (bBue) is standing on the JP1 car (probably the one that fell down from the tree with Alan and Tim)

(https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/9832013/Screen_Shot_2017_12_07_at_6.08.58_PM.png)


The Rex scene seems cool, and especially knowing that it's the Rex from JP1 but something, just like Jurassic World, seems off and makes it look too different from the JP1 Rex. I do hope it's not "friendly" like the raptors because that Rex is supposed to be a predator, and was a menace in the JP1 movie. Please no more AVP-esque teaming up.

Yeah not sure if it is the torso length or neck but the composition of the T-Rex is off

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdigitalspyuk.cdnds.net%2F16%2F47%2F980x490%2Flandscape-1479728241-jurassic-park.jpg&hash=3b99c17861c2753b87e2aba93d4134eea1cb271f)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fredcarpetrefs.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2017%2F04%2Fjurassic-park-t-rex.jpeg&hash=5d56a386bf21a5654ad850d3595344a77b61a455)

(https://cdn1.thr.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/NFE_Landscape/2017/12/jurassic_world_fallen_kingdom_0.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Dec 09, 2017, 11:12:44 PM
Rex did go from goat to Dino-meat after all ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Dec 09, 2017, 11:20:23 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t44CXQGKbmM
animatronics
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Dec 09, 2017, 11:26:12 PM
Too good!

www.Dinosaurprotectiongroup.com
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Dec 10, 2017, 12:01:52 AM
Animatronics yessss... but use them in actual film?

Nope
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Dec 10, 2017, 12:43:48 AM
Quote from: Xan21 on Dec 10, 2017, 12:01:52 AM
Animatronics yessss... but use them in actual film?

Nope
You can see one animatronic in the trailer lol.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on Dec 10, 2017, 02:42:23 AM
Which one? Cos the TRex looks painted over.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr.Turok on Dec 10, 2017, 02:50:10 AM
Quote from: Hellspawn28 on Dec 08, 2017, 06:12:40 PM
Why not move the Dinosaurs to Site B? Whatever happen to that?

Who said they wouldn't? Perhaps that's what it would lead to in the last part of the trilogy. Yo that would be cool if we can see the Spino again. Imagine Rexy vs Spino!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Dec 10, 2017, 02:58:56 AM
They're totally going to move them to a castle in Switzerland and then sic them on drug lords. ;)

Oh and the Fallen Kingdom rex looks better than that bottom shot from JP1. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Dec 10, 2017, 03:12:58 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Dec 10, 2017, 02:58:56 AM

Oh and the Fallen Kingdom rex looks better than that bottom shot from JP1. :P

The FK one lacks any realism... it's pure garbage.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Dec 10, 2017, 03:32:04 AM
However, if we wanted realism, we would see feathers...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: frenchfries on Dec 10, 2017, 04:10:40 AM
Quote from: SiL on Dec 10, 2017, 02:42:23 AM
Which one? Cos the TRex looks painted over.
theres a few cgi added elements but its mostly animatronic.
http://jurassicoutpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Awesome-Trailer-Tease-1.png
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: reecebomb on Dec 10, 2017, 04:15:36 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Dec 10, 2017, 02:58:56 AM
They're totally going to move them to a castle in Switzerland and then sic them on drug lords. ;)

Oh and the Fallen Kingdom rex looks better than that bottom shot from JP1. :P

The FK one looks like a Photoshop Mag dinosaur tutorial.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: theiss2003 on Dec 10, 2017, 08:01:54 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Dec 09, 2017, 08:32:36 PM
Yeah not sure if it is the torso length or neck but the composition of the T-Rex is off

Well, Rexy is supposed to be OLD, that's all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Dec 10, 2017, 05:22:07 PM
Quote from: reecebomb on Dec 10, 2017, 04:15:36 AM
The FK one looks like a Photoshop Mag dinosaur tutorial.

Quote from: Xan21 on Dec 10, 2017, 03:12:58 AM
The FK one lacks any realism... it's pure garbage.

They've not finished with the effects.

In the first trailer for JW the effects heavy Mosasaurus leaping for the shark looked like this...

(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/R16m5UvwCrw/maxresdefault.jpg)

but compare that to the final film.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcaps.pictures%2F201%2F5-jurrasic-world%2Ffull%2Fjurassic-world-movie-screencaps.com-3653.jpg&hash=81b34cae4e58de0c77cd16cd696f1d244438482d)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Dec 10, 2017, 06:57:49 PM
I know but the way they choose to shoot the scene sucks too... do it from LOW angles and that color grading is atrocious... JP almost every shot was realistic...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Dec 10, 2017, 07:10:10 PM
The Rex shot from the FK trailer is from a low angle.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Dec 10, 2017, 10:32:17 PM
Nope, and also shot(if you can call it that) from far away... it looks like a very good computer game sequence it's so 'perfect'. Look here is the hero dino, dead dino, here is the lead guy here are the potential victims... oh and here explodes the volcano while at the same time the hero dino roars. This ain't the freakin HOBBIT! Nothing about it looks real.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Dec 10, 2017, 10:38:54 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on Dec 10, 2017, 10:32:17 PM
Nope, and also shot(if you can call it that) from far away.

So what about how this is framed?

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic1.businessinsider.com%2Fimage%2F51d358a069beddc754000003-480%2Fbrontosaurus-jurassic-park.png&hash=1b8757838315adf03e054d9fd4bf9e46a45d36db)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Dec 10, 2017, 11:23:59 PM
That is not JP's best moment either... my friends always complained that looked the most fake from the entire movie. BUT the scene that follows is the most amazing shot in Jurassic history with the two Brachiosaurs walking out of the water and that had a lot of cgi and matte painting tweaks etc... it was just subtle as hell and JW is all about hysterical action that looks fake.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alionic on Dec 11, 2017, 01:38:24 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Dec 10, 2017, 05:22:07 PM
Quote from: reecebomb on Dec 10, 2017, 04:15:36 AM
The FK one looks like a Photoshop Mag dinosaur tutorial.

Quote from: Xan21 on Dec 10, 2017, 03:12:58 AM
The FK one lacks any realism... it's pure garbage.

They've not finished with the effects.

In the first trailer for JW the effects heavy Mosasaurus leaping for the shark looked like this...

(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/R16m5UvwCrw/maxresdefault.jpg)

but compare that to the final film.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcaps.pictures%2F201%2F5-jurrasic-world%2Ffull%2Fjurassic-world-movie-screencaps.com-3653.jpg&hash=81b34cae4e58de0c77cd16cd696f1d244438482d)

It's kind of depressing how so many background shots in movies these days are entirely fake.

Fallen Kingdom is going to likely disappoint if it revolves around saving dinosaurs from a volcano.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Dec 11, 2017, 05:26:25 AM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Dec 10, 2017, 03:32:04 AM
However, if we wanted realism, we would see feathers...
And no shrink wrapping, no pronated wrists, etc... It would be far more than feathers alone.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Jonesy1974 on Dec 11, 2017, 10:38:39 AM
Maybe its because I grew up watching Doug McClure Dino movies but the effects look absolutely fine to me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rudiger on Dec 11, 2017, 12:38:45 PM
Quote from: Jonesy1974 on Dec 11, 2017, 10:38:39 AM
Maybe its because I grew up watching Doug McClure Dino movies but the effects look absolutely fine to me.

Legend.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Dec 11, 2017, 01:58:02 PM
Quote from: Jonesy1974 on Dec 11, 2017, 10:38:39 AM
Maybe its because I grew up watching Doug McClure Dino movies but the effects look absolutely fine to me.

I second that.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages3.static-bluray.com%2Freviews%2F11992_1.jpg&hash=074583edc52dbff4602338758eb2d264c7429afc)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Jonesy1974 on Dec 11, 2017, 02:00:50 PM
Doug was the man, loved those movies.

I'd like to see them remake the one with the German U-boat, Land that time forgot.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Dec 11, 2017, 02:28:57 PM
Man so would I.

If I ever make it as a screenwriter I'll pen it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Dec 11, 2017, 03:42:42 PM
There are even three books in that series to adapt. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Dec 11, 2017, 05:57:57 PM
Exactly.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: skhellter on Dec 13, 2017, 06:16:18 PM
4Chan claims to have the plot.

Most likely "FAKE NEWS"
(But then again Jurassic World was similarly dumb so... we'll find out next year..)

here it is:

Spoiler
Four years after the outbreak at Jurassic World, Claire Dearing (Bryce Dallas Howard), the park's former operations manager, has founded the Dinosaur Protection Group to protect the creatures of Isla Nublar, which is now a forbidden zone. Upon learning that the island will be destroyed in a volcanic eruption, Claire convinces the government to authorize a rescue mission led by her ex-boyfriend, Owen Grady (Chris Pratt), who is determined to save his raptor companion, Blue.

Benjamin Lockwood (James Cromwell), who co-founded InGen Corporation and developed the dinosaur cloning technology alongside John Hammond, supports Claire's organization. InGen has gone bankrupt after the outbreak and the cloning technology has been outlawed by the United States government.

Nearing the island, the expedition's submarine is attacked by the mosasaur and heavily damaged, but Owen and Claire manage to reach the surface alongside Claire's team and mercenaries employed by Lockwood. Owen, Claire and Claire's assistant Jake (Justice Smith) venture into the ruins of Jurassic World. Owen briefly reunites with Blue before she is sedated and captured by the mercenaries alongside several other dinosaurs, in order to be safely extracted from the island.

The Baryonyx attacks the trio in the ruins of Jurassic World, but they manage to escape just as the volcano erupts, killing the Baryonyx and several others. The T-Rex saves Owen, Claire and Jake during the chaos, but is then captured by the mercenaries. Owen, Claire and her team are betrayed by the mercenaries, captured and taken to a secret research facility where Dr. Henry Wu (B.D. Wong) is creating weaponized hybrids.

Wu's greatest creation is the Indominus Raptor, whose intelligence has surpassed his expectations. Claire learns that Lockwood is behind everything, having used Claire's expedition to gain access to the dinosaurs and use them as test subjects to complete the hybrids that he believe will restore his reputation. Owen and Claire also meet Lockwood's granddaughter Grace.

Blue attacks scientists that attempted to experiment on her, giving the I-Raptor an opportunity to escape. It slaughters the mercenaries and unleashes the captive dinosaurs before hunting down its creators for revenge. Lockwood attempts to kill Owen and Claire, but is killed by Blue, who then faces the I-Raptor and is severely injured. The National Guard arrives to rescue the staff, and Claire's team manages to sneak an injured Blue out. Wu also escapes.

Owen and Claire go back to rescue Grace before the National Guard bombs the facility to wipe out the dinosaurs. The I-Raptor chases them, so they unleash the T-Rex to fight it. The I-Raptor kills the T-Rex. Owen, Claire and Grace are extracted via helicopter. The I-Raptor hears the approaching helicopters and escapes before the facility is bombed, killing the dinosaurs. The I-Raptor then escapes into civilization, ready to unleash hell.

Dr. Ian Malcolm (Jeff Goldblum) only appears once, testifying in Claire's favor on a Congress hearing to determine whether the rescue mission on Isla Nublar should be approved or not
[close]

Carnosaur as f**k.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Dec 13, 2017, 06:41:03 PM
Quote from: skhellter on Dec 13, 2017, 06:16:18 PM
4Chan claims to have the plot.

Most likely "FAKE NEWS"
(But then again Jurassic World was similarly dumb so... we'll find out next year..)

here it is:

Spoiler
Four years after the outbreak at Jurassic World, Claire Dearing (Bryce Dallas Howard), the park's former operations manager, has founded the Dinosaur Protection Group to protect the creatures of Isla Nublar, which is now a forbidden zone. Upon learning that the island will be destroyed in a volcanic eruption, Claire convinces the government to authorize a rescue mission led by her ex-boyfriend, Owen Grady (Chris Pratt), who is determined to save his raptor companion, Blue.

Benjamin Lockwood (James Cromwell), who co-founded InGen Corporation and developed the dinosaur cloning technology alongside John Hammond, supports Claire's organization. InGen has gone bankrupt after the outbreak and the cloning technology has been outlawed by the United States government.

Nearing the island, the expedition's submarine is attacked by the mosasaur and heavily damaged, but Owen and Claire manage to reach the surface alongside Claire's team and mercenaries employed by Lockwood. Owen, Claire and Claire's assistant Jake (Justice Smith) venture into the ruins of Jurassic World. Owen briefly reunites with Blue before she is sedated and captured by the mercenaries alongside several other dinosaurs, in order to be safely extracted from the island.

The Baryonyx attacks the trio in the ruins of Jurassic World, but they manage to escape just as the volcano erupts, killing the Baryonyx and several others. The T-Rex saves Owen, Claire and Jake during the chaos, but is then captured by the mercenaries. Owen, Claire and her team are betrayed by the mercenaries, captured and taken to a secret research facility where Dr. Henry Wu (B.D. Wong) is creating weaponized hybrids.

Wu's greatest creation is the Indominus Raptor, whose intelligence has surpassed his expectations. Claire learns that Lockwood is behind everything, having used Claire's expedition to gain access to the dinosaurs and use them as test subjects to complete the hybrids that he believe will restore his reputation. Owen and Claire also meet Lockwood's granddaughter Grace.

Blue attacks scientists that attempted to experiment on her, giving the I-Raptor an opportunity to escape. It slaughters the mercenaries and unleashes the captive dinosaurs before hunting down its creators for revenge. Lockwood attempts to kill Owen and Claire, but is killed by Blue, who then faces the I-Raptor and is severely injured. The National Guard arrives to rescue the staff, and Claire's team manages to sneak an injured Blue out. Wu also escapes.

Owen and Claire go back to rescue Grace before the National Guard bombs the facility to wipe out the dinosaurs. The I-Raptor chases them, so they unleash the T-Rex to fight it. The I-Raptor kills the T-Rex. Owen, Claire and Grace are extracted via helicopter. The I-Raptor hears the approaching helicopters and escapes before the facility is bombed, killing the dinosaurs. The I-Raptor then escapes into civilization, ready to unleash hell.

Dr. Ian Malcolm (Jeff Goldblum) only appears once, testifying in Claire's favor on a Congress hearing to determine whether the rescue mission on Isla Nublar should be approved or not
[close]

Carnosaur as f**k.  :laugh:

If this is true
Spoiler
the i raptor killing the t rex seems potentially over the top... How the f**k is he able to do that ?
[close]
and why in the hell
Spoiler
would a t rex save humans ? I hope it's just a coincidence that the t rex happened to pass by and after "saving"
the heroes, she will try to eat them at least
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: skhellter on Dec 13, 2017, 06:44:53 PM
remember that in Jurassic World, these characters unleashed the T-Rex to save them, too...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Dec 13, 2017, 07:29:22 PM
Quote from: skhellter on Dec 13, 2017, 06:16:18 PM
4Chan claims to have the plot.

Most likely "FAKE NEWS"
(But then again Jurassic World was similarly dumb so... we'll find out next year..)

here it is:

Spoiler
Four years after the outbreak at Jurassic World, Claire Dearing (Bryce Dallas Howard), the park's former operations manager, has founded the Dinosaur Protection Group to protect the creatures of Isla Nublar, which is now a forbidden zone. Upon learning that the island will be destroyed in a volcanic eruption, Claire convinces the government to authorize a rescue mission led by her ex-boyfriend, Owen Grady (Chris Pratt), who is determined to save his raptor companion, Blue.

Benjamin Lockwood (James Cromwell), who co-founded InGen Corporation and developed the dinosaur cloning technology alongside John Hammond, supports Claire's organization. InGen has gone bankrupt after the outbreak and the cloning technology has been outlawed by the United States government.

Nearing the island, the expedition's submarine is attacked by the mosasaur and heavily damaged, but Owen and Claire manage to reach the surface alongside Claire's team and mercenaries employed by Lockwood. Owen, Claire and Claire's assistant Jake (Justice Smith) venture into the ruins of Jurassic World. Owen briefly reunites with Blue before she is sedated and captured by the mercenaries alongside several other dinosaurs, in order to be safely extracted from the island.

The Baryonyx attacks the trio in the ruins of Jurassic World, but they manage to escape just as the volcano erupts, killing the Baryonyx and several others. The T-Rex saves Owen, Claire and Jake during the chaos, but is then captured by the mercenaries. Owen, Claire and her team are betrayed by the mercenaries, captured and taken to a secret research facility where Dr. Henry Wu (B.D. Wong) is creating weaponized hybrids.

Wu's greatest creation is the Indominus Raptor, whose intelligence has surpassed his expectations. Claire learns that Lockwood is behind everything, having used Claire's expedition to gain access to the dinosaurs and use them as test subjects to complete the hybrids that he believe will restore his reputation. Owen and Claire also meet Lockwood's granddaughter Grace.

Blue attacks scientists that attempted to experiment on her, giving the I-Raptor an opportunity to escape. It slaughters the mercenaries and unleashes the captive dinosaurs before hunting down its creators for revenge. Lockwood attempts to kill Owen and Claire, but is killed by Blue, who then faces the I-Raptor and is severely injured. The National Guard arrives to rescue the staff, and Claire's team manages to sneak an injured Blue out. Wu also escapes.

Owen and Claire go back to rescue Grace before the National Guard bombs the facility to wipe out the dinosaurs. The I-Raptor chases them, so they unleash the T-Rex to fight it. The I-Raptor kills the T-Rex. Owen, Claire and Grace are extracted via helicopter. The I-Raptor hears the approaching helicopters and escapes before the facility is bombed, killing the dinosaurs. The I-Raptor then escapes into civilization, ready to unleash hell.

Dr. Ian Malcolm (Jeff Goldblum) only appears once, testifying in Claire's favor on a Congress hearing to determine whether the rescue mission on Isla Nublar should be approved or not
[close]

Carnosaur as f**k.  :laugh:

This is pretty much how I expected the movie to go. I would say this sounds legit based on the stuff we have seen. Like the BTS photo of the Indo raptor mouth attacking some guy that I didn't recognise. In a lab looking environment.

Spoiler
wont be happy about Rexy getting killed by the IndoRaptor. I called the name Indominus raptor for this right after watching Jurassic world. I said to my fiancé that i thought that would be the main villian of an inevitable sequel and that would be its name.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Dec 13, 2017, 09:11:41 PM
How convenient they leave all the unknown names out... and get the little girls name wrong. Fake but well tried.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Dec 13, 2017, 09:17:50 PM
Quote from: skhellter on Dec 13, 2017, 06:16:18 PM
4Chan claims to have the plot.

Most likely "FAKE NEWS"
(But then again Jurassic World was similarly dumb so... we'll find out next year..)

here it is:

Spoiler
Four years after the outbreak at Jurassic World, Claire Dearing (Bryce Dallas Howard), the park's former operations manager, has founded the Dinosaur Protection Group to protect the creatures of Isla Nublar, which is now a forbidden zone. Upon learning that the island will be destroyed in a volcanic eruption, Claire convinces the government to authorize a rescue mission led by her ex-boyfriend, Owen Grady (Chris Pratt), who is determined to save his raptor companion, Blue.

Benjamin Lockwood (James Cromwell), who co-founded InGen Corporation and developed the dinosaur cloning technology alongside John Hammond, supports Claire's organization. InGen has gone bankrupt after the outbreak and the cloning technology has been outlawed by the United States government.

Nearing the island, the expedition's submarine is attacked by the mosasaur and heavily damaged, but Owen and Claire manage to reach the surface alongside Claire's team and mercenaries employed by Lockwood. Owen, Claire and Claire's assistant Jake (Justice Smith) venture into the ruins of Jurassic World. Owen briefly reunites with Blue before she is sedated and captured by the mercenaries alongside several other dinosaurs, in order to be safely extracted from the island.

The Baryonyx attacks the trio in the ruins of Jurassic World, but they manage to escape just as the volcano erupts, killing the Baryonyx and several others. The T-Rex saves Owen, Claire and Jake during the chaos, but is then captured by the mercenaries. Owen, Claire and her team are betrayed by the mercenaries, captured and taken to a secret research facility where Dr. Henry Wu (B.D. Wong) is creating weaponized hybrids.

Wu's greatest creation is the Indominus Raptor, whose intelligence has surpassed his expectations. Claire learns that Lockwood is behind everything, having used Claire's expedition to gain access to the dinosaurs and use them as test subjects to complete the hybrids that he believe will restore his reputation. Owen and Claire also meet Lockwood's granddaughter Grace.

Blue attacks scientists that attempted to experiment on her, giving the I-Raptor an opportunity to escape. It slaughters the mercenaries and unleashes the captive dinosaurs before hunting down its creators for revenge. Lockwood attempts to kill Owen and Claire, but is killed by Blue, who then faces the I-Raptor and is severely injured. The National Guard arrives to rescue the staff, and Claire's team manages to sneak an injured Blue out. Wu also escapes.

Owen and Claire go back to rescue Grace before the National Guard bombs the facility to wipe out the dinosaurs. The I-Raptor chases them, so they unleash the T-Rex to fight it. The I-Raptor kills the T-Rex. Owen, Claire and Grace are extracted via helicopter. The I-Raptor hears the approaching helicopters and escapes before the facility is bombed, killing the dinosaurs. The I-Raptor then escapes into civilization, ready to unleash hell.

Dr. Ian Malcolm (Jeff Goldblum) only appears once, testifying in Claire's favor on a Congress hearing to determine whether the rescue mission on Isla Nublar should be approved or not
[close]

Carnosaur as f**k.  :laugh:
I hope this fake news. They will still get my money either way :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Dec 13, 2017, 09:58:01 PM
Quote from: skhellter on Dec 13, 2017, 06:44:53 PM
remember that in Jurassic World, these characters unleashed the T-Rex to save them, too...

Of course but wow, twice in a row ! Didn't think they would dare, if this is true...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: skhellter on Dec 13, 2017, 11:54:18 PM
It was hinted at in the last round of promos.

Owen and Claire going up to the sleeping T-Rex......


Anyway, the 4chan plot synopsis was debunked.
There's no submarine stuff in the film. It's fake news.

(But, given that it was based on the trailer, behind the scenes and promo material,
it's likely to be kinda accurate, still.)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Dec 14, 2017, 01:42:50 AM
Good or bad, at least this movie gives me an excuse to cross that JP4 script off my to-do list.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Dec 14, 2017, 02:24:13 AM
Quote from: skhellter on Dec 13, 2017, 11:54:18 PM
It was hinted at in the last round of promos.

Owen and Claire going up to the sleeping T-Rex......

I know lol, but the t-rex couldn't save them conciously, i mean it's a t-rex ! Humans saving a t-rex doesn't create a bound strong enough to surpass the food chain logic i believe... But i think i'm trying to make sense of something that doesn't in this movie  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Dec 29, 2017, 04:22:44 PM
(https://i2.wp.com/bloody-disgusting.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/jurassic-world.jpg?zoom=1.5625&resize=582%2C246)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Dec 29, 2017, 09:39:18 PM
HQ.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DSNd47dW0AEPfzA.jpg:large)

Quote from: skhellter on Dec 13, 2017, 06:16:18 PM
4Chan claims to have the plot.

Fake.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SuicideDoors on Dec 29, 2017, 10:08:52 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Dec 29, 2017, 09:39:18 PM
HQ.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DSNd47dW0AEPfzA.jpg:large)

Quote from: skhellter on Dec 13, 2017, 06:16:18 PM
4Chan claims to have the plot.

Fake.

I hope so!

Spoiler
The indorapter killing the T Rex sounds anti-climatic and to be blunt a bit of a slap in the face
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr. Xenomorph on Dec 29, 2017, 10:34:26 PM
Spoiler
There's no way they would kill Rexy that way after JP///. The Baryonyx going out that way is more likely.

In JP/// the Spinosaurus was scripted to die by Velociraptor pack, but it got cut due to the budget. They may have recycled it like that motorcycle sequence with the Raptors in Jurassic World. A variation of that was intended for The Lost World but it got cut in pre-production. Then it came so close to being in JP/// they made toys for it. I could see them retooling the Spino/Raptor sequence for the Baryonyx.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naginata on Dec 30, 2017, 05:54:54 PM
If rumors and ridiculous fan analysis are anything to go by, this movie looks to have Carnotaurus, Baryonyx and Allosaurus in it. Garbage screenplay or no, I'm there opening night. I'm so there it hurts.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: genocyber on Dec 30, 2017, 10:34:41 PM
The raptors in the JP movies seem utterly fearless in the face of a bigger prey, which if you're trying to sell us on how dinosaurs would act they would be miles away from any T Rex or larger predator than them.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naginata on Dec 30, 2017, 10:54:37 PM
The accuracy ship has pretty much sailed, though. The raptors are also larger, smarter and way less fluffy than they would have been in real life, to say nothing of their door-opening mutant hands. This is actually a plot point in the books; the 'dinosaurs' are genetically engineered facsimiles of what people assume dinosaurs were like rather than straight clones.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: JungleHunter87 on Dec 30, 2017, 11:06:51 PM
Quote from: Naginata on Dec 30, 2017, 10:54:37 PM
The accuracy ship has pretty much sailed, though. The raptors are also larger, smarter and way less fluffy than they would have been in real life, to say nothing of their door-opening mutant hands. This is actually a plot point in the books; the 'dinosaurs' are genetically engineered facsimiles of what people assume dinosaurs were like rather than straight clones.

Exactly! Grant mentions this in JP3 -
" Dinosaurs lived sixty five million years ago. What is left of them is fossilized in the rocks, and it is in the rock that real scientists make real discoveries. Now what John Hammond and InGen did at Jurassic Park is create genetically engineered theme park monsters, nothing more and nothing less. "
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Dec 30, 2017, 11:16:25 PM
Quote from: Naginata on Dec 30, 2017, 10:54:37 PM
The accuracy ship has pretty much sailed, though. The raptors are also larger, smarter and way less fluffy than they would have been in real life, to say nothing of their door-opening mutant hands. This is actually a plot point in the books; the 'dinosaurs' are genetically engineered facsimiles of what people assume dinosaurs were like rather than straight clones.

They forfeited accuracy when they dropped the nuances of the books and just made the Deinonychus a "velociraptor". The book at minimum explains the reasoning behind this. The films completely dropped it. We're watching deinonychus get called "raptors".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Dec 31, 2017, 11:16:30 AM
Quote from: genocyber on Dec 30, 2017, 10:34:41 PM
The raptors in the JP movies seem utterly fearless in the face of a bigger prey, which if you're trying to sell us on how dinosaurs would act they would be miles away from any T Rex or larger predator than them.

Not necessarily.

Some animals don't factor size into their instinct to attack/defend.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Dec 31, 2017, 02:14:46 PM
Indeed, I see small birds attack hawks in my yard to protect their nests.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstaff.washington.edu%2Fmeganw%2Fboy%2Fsamneill2.jpg&hash=3a2a6effcdcd0fc2647747c3fb83f19c9fc64c8d)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Dec 31, 2017, 08:53:01 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Dec 31, 2017, 02:14:46 PM
Indeed, I see small birds attack hawks in my yard to protect their nests.

http://staff.washington.edu/meganw/boy/samneill2.jpg

Heh, that pic is from hiw encounter with the Billy Zaneosaurus.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naginata on Jan 04, 2018, 12:21:22 PM
Quote from: Gate on Dec 30, 2017, 11:16:25 PM
They forfeited accuracy when they dropped the nuances of the books and just made the Deinonychus a "velociraptor". The book at minimum explains the reasoning behind this. The films completely dropped it. We're watching deinonychus get called "raptors".

I hate to say it, but they probably didn't want to bog down the movie with long-winded lectures that most of the audience won't understand or care about. Jurassic Park is a finely tuned machine of a movie; I love Michael Crichton's original novel, but a lot of it wouldn't translate well to screen.

... Also, "Velociraptor" sounds cooler.  :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: theiss2003 on Jan 04, 2018, 01:10:54 PM
From Wikipedia:

"Deinonychus antirrhopus is one of the best-known dromaeosaurid species, and is a close relative of the smaller Velociraptor, which is found in younger, Late Cretaceous–age rock formations in Central Asia. The clade they form is called Velociraptorinae. The subfamily name Velociraptorinae was first coined by Rinchen Barsbold in 1983 and originally contained the single genus Velociraptor."

Basically this means that at the time Crichton wrote the first book, Deinonychus antirrhopus was in fact a species within the single genus Velociraptor, hence the naming.

Later it was finally put it in it's own genus Deinonychus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Biomechanoid on Jan 04, 2018, 01:34:50 PM
Quote from: Gate on Dec 30, 2017, 11:16:25 PM
They forfeited accuracy when they dropped the nuances of the books

Accuracy is overrated.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr. Xenomorph on Jan 04, 2018, 01:50:48 PM
 
Quote from: theiss2003 on Jan 04, 2018, 01:10:54 PM
From Wikipedia:

"Deinonychus antirrhopus is one of the best-known dromaeosaurid species, and is a close relative of the smaller Velociraptor, which is found in younger, Late Cretaceous–age rock formations in Central Asia. The clade they form is called Velociraptorinae. The subfamily name Velociraptorinae was first coined by Rinchen Barsbold in 1983 and originally contained the single genus Velociraptor."

Basically this means that at the time Crichton wrote the first book, Deinonychus antirrhopus was in fact a species within the single genus Velociraptor, hence the naming.

Later it was finally put it in it's own genus Deinonychus.

In the first novel, Grant asked Henry Wu about the genus of the raptors and Wu said that they were mongoleinsis. Grant comments that the raptor they were excavating in Montana was an antirrhopus. I always found the distinction fascinating.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naginata on Jan 04, 2018, 04:18:56 PM
Quote from: Biomechanoid on Jan 04, 2018, 01:34:50 PM
Accuracy is overrated.

There's this idea that portraying dinosaurs semi-accurately somehow makes them boring, and I don't understand it.

They've given the Baryonyx a short snout and dinky little begging puppy arms instead of a nasty crocodile-like maw and the badass meat hook claws it had in real life. It's scientifically inaccurate, yes, but it's also not as cool. If you strip away all the distinctive features, it just becomes a generic meat-eating dinosaur in a movie filled with meat-eating dinosaurs. Add said awesome features back in, and you've got every kid in the world's new favorite dinosaur. Just in terms of pure asses-in-seats capitalism, which of these two approaches is gonna move more product?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr. Xenomorph on Jan 04, 2018, 05:09:22 PM
^They may be emulating the toys again in regards to some of the designs.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jptoys.com%2Ftoy-database%2Flost-world%2Flost-world-series-2%2Fdinosaurs%2Fbaryonyx%2Fimg%2Fbaryonyx.jpg&hash=50079d4886d304747e1ebca2d987696c0bfe4523)

Hell, Jurassic World was basically Chaos Effect: the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Jan 04, 2018, 05:30:40 PM
Quote from: Mr. Xenomorph on Jan 04, 2018, 05:09:22 PM
^They may be emulating the toys again in regards to some of the designs.

http://www.jptoys.com/toy-database/lost-world/lost-world-series-2/dinosaurs/baryonyx/img/baryonyx.jpg

Hell, Jurassic World was basically Chaos Effect: the movie.
I would go so far as to say that toy is better than what they came up with for the movie. I also love all of the artists going out and doing their own Baryonyx's after they saw how horrid the movie one was.
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F78.media.tumblr.com%2F0fe2f06e12ee3c8bd8271532e568a70b%2Ftumblr_p12kc2KEpf1qff956o1_1280.jpg&hash=1d2508a4c8babd609649ec9244058657184d743c)
[close]
Spoiler
(https://pre00.deviantart.net/8b4d/th/pre/f/2017/352/8/b/_sketch_jw_bary___1____copy_by_fredthedinosaurman-dbx3mzr.png)
[close]
Spoiler
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRC4X66VwAATuRY.jpg:large)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jan 04, 2018, 06:41:29 PM
They probably designed the Bary in mind that a Suchomimus will be seen later in the film, or dare I say the return of a Spinosaur.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naginata on Jan 04, 2018, 08:03:38 PM
I actually really hope that's the reason, because that means that they stuffed too many dinosaurs into one movie and had to deliberately mess some of them up so people could tell them apart. This, in turn, suggests they had to change the design of one dinosaur because it looks too much like another dinosaur because they tried to stuff so many dinosaurs into this movie that they lost track.

In summary: we've got evil corporations, dinosaur liberation activists, more silly mutated hybrids, a completely gratuitous Jeff Goldblum appearance, and a volcano erupting. Those elements could add up to a boring, stupid mess... OR they could explode into an orgy of sublime insanity not seen since Gremlins 2. I'm hoping for the latter.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jan 09, 2018, 01:36:02 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kklwZ9KEy3A
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jan 09, 2018, 02:45:59 AM
Wonder if we will get 25 seconds of deleted scenes for the 25th anniversary?!?! Will still upgrade anyways :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr. Xenomorph on Jan 09, 2018, 03:30:48 AM
Eh, I'll get it. I'm a Jurassic Park junkie, LOL. I own it on VHS, Laserdisc, DVD (three versions), Blu Ray and Digital HDX. I have four different editions of the novel (a first edition Lost World hardcover I'm especially proud of). I have the original theatrical poster, most of the McDonald's tie-in cups and as much merchandise as I could hang on to (plush with the tags, vintage action figures and toys). Yeah, I'll get it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Scorpio on Jan 09, 2018, 01:14:58 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Jan 09, 2018, 01:36:02 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kklwZ9KEy3A

Laura Dern was so fit in that movie. 

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Feb 04, 2018, 09:53:29 PM
https://twitter.com/LeDoctor/status/960256797184438272

https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/960163263773315072

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NooW_RbfdWI
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Feb 04, 2018, 11:54:52 PM
Saw it live. Blown away.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Feb 05, 2018, 12:21:01 AM
f**king Dobby as the bad guy. 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Feb 05, 2018, 02:02:54 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMOljrWUUXc
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Feb 05, 2018, 02:22:55 AM
My vote for best commercial!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 05, 2018, 02:47:39 AM
www.DinosaurProtectionGroup.com
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: kwisatz on Feb 05, 2018, 03:10:28 AM
And i thought JW was the low point.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Magegg on Feb 05, 2018, 03:22:36 AM
http://birthmoviesdeath.com/2015/06/15/the-strangely-cruel-and-unusual-death-in-jurassic-world
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Feb 05, 2018, 08:22:55 AM
Dissapointing trailer... again... the opening was weird, but I don't even wanna waste my time writing a review. So mweh. The jeep commercial was pretty cool.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: D88M on Feb 05, 2018, 11:21:49 AM
Bad trailer, they are selling the movie as it will be non stop action, the design of the animals and their interactivity with the cast is as cartoonis has in JW, and looks like a remake of TLW with yet again shots that recall JP moments and a remake of JW with yet again a dinosaur hibryd. This new trilogy they are making is really weird.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 05, 2018, 11:31:13 AM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Feb 04, 2018, 11:54:52 PM
Saw it live. Blown away.

Yeeeeaaaah Boooooi!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Wweyland on Feb 05, 2018, 11:34:32 AM
What is their reason for going back to the island again? Chris Pratt's character misses his pet dinosaur so let's get people killed?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Feb 05, 2018, 12:26:33 PM
Much like the latest Star Wars, I have no interest in this.

Both are franchises I love that are doing nothing at all to excite me with their most recent entries.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Feb 05, 2018, 02:49:46 PM
This god damn mutant raptor gives me the creeps though...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Feb 05, 2018, 04:54:08 PM
Quote from: Wweyland on Feb 05, 2018, 11:34:32 AM
What is their reason for going back to the island again? Chris Pratt's character misses his pet dinosaur so let's get people killed?
Mount Sibo is about to erupt and Claire runs a dinosaur protection group.

Spoiler
Gonna predict right now her group is tricked into helping Hammond's old partner who then sells dinosaurs on the black market. Totally what it looks like.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Feb 05, 2018, 06:15:29 PM
The Mosasaurus is reported missing on the Dinosaur Protection Group  page hahahaha
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr.Turok on Feb 05, 2018, 06:44:21 PM
Quote from: Gate on Feb 05, 2018, 04:54:08 PM
Quote from: Wweyland on Feb 05, 2018, 11:34:32 AM
What is their reason for going back to the island again? Chris Pratt's character misses his pet dinosaur so let's get people killed?
Mount Sibo is about to erupt and Claire runs a dinosaur protection group.

Spoiler
Gonna predict right now her group is tricked into helping Hammond's old partner who then sells dinosaurs on the black market. Totally what it looks like.
[close]

Honestly I don't understand why people get mad at the idea. I mean people have policies and take action to protect endangered species already. Super rare species such as dinosaurs would definitely be something people would naturally take about in the JP Universe when it comes to preserving them. It's been stated in both the novel and movie versions of The Lost World that Site B is a natural preserve for them so it would make sense for some kind of discourse to be made if further action should be taken to save the ones on Isla Nublar. Especially since these dinosaurs have been in the public mind since the opening of Jurassic World, it wouldn't be surprising if the people there started to hold protests and calls to their respective governments to save them.

Not to mention, like with all new science and technology, there will always be some kind of military use and the power of genetic engineering is something no nation or power will ignore. 

That being said, I wonder why the Indoraptor is hanging out in a little girls room? A first time assassination test or something?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Feb 05, 2018, 07:04:37 PM
The Indoraptor is being auctioned off in or close to the Lockwood mansion where she lives. We don't know yet who her parents are... Lockwood is her grandpa I believe.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Feb 06, 2018, 06:53:22 AM
Quote from: Xan21 on Feb 05, 2018, 07:04:37 PM
Spoiler
The Indoraptor is being auctioned off in or close to the Lockwood mansion where she lives. We don't know yet who her parents are... Lockwood is her grandpa I believe.
[close]
Spoiler tags are your friend, and a rule. Added them here for you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Highland on Feb 06, 2018, 09:05:45 AM
Trailer shows a lot of the tense bits of the movie. Big sign it's garbage. I liked Jurassic World too, thought it was fun.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: reecebomb on Feb 06, 2018, 11:01:51 PM
Jurassic World was a fun in a silly b-movie dinosaur cartoon way. I except it to be a as silly but it looks it tries to be scary at the same time, which might work, there's hope.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Feb 07, 2018, 04:14:16 PM
Oh i didn't notice the kid from The Get Down was in this... Hated that show  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 15, 2018, 09:45:03 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DWA0T-AXUAATTQ-.jpg:large)

https://twitter.com/DinoProtectGrp

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Feb 15, 2018, 12:09:43 PM
👍
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Feb 15, 2018, 04:00:37 PM
They managed to screw up the arms on the Carno. Hilarious.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Feb 15, 2018, 06:40:12 PM
Quote from: Godzillakuj94 on Feb 15, 2018, 04:00:37 PM
They managed to screw up the arms on the Carno. Hilarious.
None of these are real dinosaurs. We've been through this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Feb 16, 2018, 02:16:01 AM
Quote from: Gate on Feb 15, 2018, 06:40:12 PM
Quote from: Godzillakuj94 on Feb 15, 2018, 04:00:37 PM
They managed to screw up the arms on the Carno. Hilarious.
None of these are real dinosaurs. We've been through this.
I know, I just find it funny. Carno's small arms are one of it's defining features.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Feb 20, 2018, 05:47:23 AM
Quote from: reecebomb on Feb 06, 2018, 11:01:51 PM
Jurassic World was a fun in a silly b-movie dinosaur cartoon way. I except it to be a as silly but it looks it tries to be scary at the same time, which might work, there's hope.

There's definitely a scare factor there, I was pleasantly surprised by it. How it will play out in the film is the ultimate thing though. Even the scariest moment can be ruined by the wrong music or dialogue. I'd love to see a more serious (darker) tone in these films.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Feb 20, 2018, 01:42:35 PM
I think there will be good chunks of humor in it to please the crowd, but there will also be darker tones like always in this series
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Feb 21, 2018, 07:55:21 PM
Feathered T. Rex

(https://i.imgur.com/AJCUzTi.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Feb 21, 2018, 07:58:56 PM
https://www.cbr.com/jurassic-world-3-release-date/

Release date set for Jurassic World 3
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Feb 21, 2018, 08:58:56 PM
Spoiler
Back in November, Trevorrow alluded to Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom setting up third Jurassic World film. "At the end of this movie, it's not a cliffhanger, but it's designed for people to want to know what's going to happen next, whereas the earlier Jurassic Park movies had pretty clear definitive endings. They were much more episodic," he explained in an interview with Sebas Tabany. "In working with Derek Connolly, my co-writer, we were also thinking about where it was gonna go in the future
[close]

Yep, I'm officially super excited for Fallen Kingdom! :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 23, 2018, 01:45:30 AM
https://twitter.com/DinoProtectGrp/status/966734546208161792

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DWqCrqfWsAAKN-J.jpg:large)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: kwisatz on Feb 23, 2018, 03:58:37 AM
Give them weapons?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Feb 23, 2018, 04:05:25 AM
Quote from: kwisatz on Feb 23, 2018, 03:58:37 AM
Give them weapons?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpuhLkh358Y
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: kwisatz on Feb 23, 2018, 04:09:11 AM
Oh my f***ing god Dino f***ing Riders; i completely forget about them.


(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.toyarchive.com%2FDinoRiders%2FDRSeries2Picture.jpg&hash=363a05a5d65412a93760d0a7a3140c79cf6db65e)


Best thing for f***ing ever; HOLYghghghghgh

Thanks for reminding me!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Feb 23, 2018, 05:07:53 AM
Quote from: Crazy Shrimp on Feb 21, 2018, 07:55:21 PM
Feathered T. Rex

(https://i.imgur.com/AJCUzTi.jpg)

That looks wicked! Now if we could just get an after credits scene where a raptor is leaping towards a first person view of an unknown figure wielding a tek bow....
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Feb 23, 2018, 01:21:01 PM
Yeah !!! f**king Turok man !
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Feb 23, 2018, 07:48:29 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dm0njVMWG3g

Give me this game. Now.


Spoiler
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnuowcR7blQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTT2P-QuIY8

Masrani was cloning dinosaurs in secret Pre-JP3. Ceratosaurus, Ankylosaurus and Spinosaurus were all made by Masrani.

Spinosaurus is implied to be a hybrid creature, which explains its ferocity and its upright posture.

Callback to Tresspasser, confirmed now that 7 T-Rexes were roaming Sorna.

Nearly all the dinosaurs in Jurassic World were shipped off of Sorna. Its implied to be devoid of dinosaurs now.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Feb 23, 2018, 10:36:25 PM
Don't know how I feel about that last point.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Feb 24, 2018, 12:22:33 AM
Quote from: BigDaddyJohn on Feb 23, 2018, 01:21:01 PM
Yeah !!! f**king Turok man !


"...Protocols state that you can use live ammunition. You've got a firestorm cannon in your armory. Put in on a chopper, and smoke this thing!"  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Feb 24, 2018, 01:09:26 AM
Quote from: Godzillakuj94 on Feb 23, 2018, 10:36:25 PM
Don't know how I feel about that last point.
Don't you love that Trespasser is now canon in some regards thanks to the backstory?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Feb 24, 2018, 07:59:33 AM
Quote from: Gate on Feb 24, 2018, 01:09:26 AM
Quote from: Godzillakuj94 on Feb 23, 2018, 10:36:25 PM
Don't know how I feel about that last point.
Don't you love that Trespasser is now canon in some regards thanks to the backstory?
Spoiler
I like that, it's just I'm not sure how I like the idea of Sorna being dino free.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Mar 03, 2018, 12:05:28 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rX8NZdZ3GMQ
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 03, 2018, 02:38:52 AM
SAVE THE DINOSAURS!!! WHOOO!!! ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Mar 03, 2018, 05:14:20 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1_944p9epo
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 03, 2018, 10:57:45 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Mar 03, 2018, 12:05:28 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rX8NZdZ3GMQ

Fans of JP3 should read this page from the DPG site: http://www.dinosaurprotectiongroup.com/what-killed-the-gene-guard-act.html
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: D88M on Mar 04, 2018, 11:53:13 AM
That game looks better with every video released.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Mar 04, 2018, 06:44:43 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MyyHEVmn8bE

If JP was rated R, imagine this scene for a moment.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Wweyland on Mar 04, 2018, 07:43:31 PM
Any love for the Tresspasser game here?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 04, 2018, 10:59:03 PM
Quote from: Gate on Mar 04, 2018, 06:44:43 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MyyHEVmn8bE

If JP was rated R, imagine this scene for a moment.
Take my money and make it happen! :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Mar 04, 2018, 11:05:54 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 04, 2018, 10:59:03 PM
Quote from: Gate on Mar 04, 2018, 06:44:43 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MyyHEVmn8bE

If JP was rated R, imagine this scene for a moment.
Take my money and make it happen! :D

The Dilo could be played by Michael Richards in a rubber suit. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Mar 04, 2018, 11:51:35 PM
Quote from: Wweyland on Mar 04, 2018, 07:43:31 PM
Any love for the Tresspasser game here?
Yes. As stated above, it appears Fallen Kingdom is taking Trespasser lore and incorporating it into the film canon. See spoilers from earlier.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nychus on Mar 05, 2018, 12:34:23 AM
Quote from: Gate on Mar 04, 2018, 06:44:43 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MyyHEVmn8bE

If JP was rated R, imagine this scene for a moment.
Suspected that someone would eventually post that. The guy who did it also made one for the main T.rex attack:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AztA3Qj0r4A
There's one major difference from the movie, the Rex literally picks up the jeep and throws it! How awesome would that be to see in a remake?  8)

The Dilo scene is like something out of a George Romero zombie film. Poor Nedry wasn't even characterized as much as a villain but more of a pissed off employee resorting to espionage out of desperation as opposed to his more token Spielberg portrayal. It makes his death tad bit more gringeworthy knowing how more drawn out and creepy it is in the book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Mar 05, 2018, 02:13:16 AM
I hope y'all are happy.

Spoiler
Listening to the complete audiobook now :P
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Mar 05, 2018, 01:57:27 PM
Quote from: Wweyland on Mar 04, 2018, 07:43:31 PM
Any love for the Tresspasser game here?

Yeah, very good concept, but very bad execution  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Mar 08, 2018, 12:38:59 PM
https://twitter.com/io9/status/971599922687508480
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 08, 2018, 02:11:28 PM
Quote from: Crazy Shrimp on Mar 08, 2018, 12:38:59 PM
https://twitter.com/io9/status/971599922687508480

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PjVdN44mXj4&t=0s
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Mar 08, 2018, 07:50:20 PM
I am upset that I'm interested in that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 08, 2018, 09:33:52 PM
The new pinball games are more my cup of tea...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QtwlA5WmasU&t=215s
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Jacku on Mar 13, 2018, 02:36:13 PM
 ;D ;D ;D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6sCpfVQCbc
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Mar 13, 2018, 07:18:00 PM
Quote from: Jacku on Mar 13, 2018, 02:36:13 PM
;D ;D ;D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6sCpfVQCbc

This will be the JPOG we deserved back in 2003
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 16, 2018, 09:39:47 PM
The music sounding incredible so far!

https://twitter.com/FilmBayona/status/973876423533498370

https://twitter.com/FilmBayona/status/974662654643113984
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: irn on Mar 16, 2018, 09:59:53 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Mar 16, 2018, 09:39:47 PM
The music sounding incredible so far!

https://twitter.com/FilmBayona/status/973876423533498370

https://twitter.com/FilmBayona/status/974662654643113984

They've done a great job with from what we've heard so far.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Mar 17, 2018, 05:22:26 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ib4ghDbtlBc
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: D88M on Mar 17, 2018, 11:55:36 AM
If that music is from the last scene of the movie, i will say here right now that it means that it ends on a cliffhanger and we will be set for a chaotic in the best sense of the word final movie for the new trilogy.

If the new game is as half as good as i think is gonna be we will be in front of the ultimate dinosaur simulator/game.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Mar 17, 2018, 06:14:00 PM
Colin Trevorrow said we're gonna 'lose our shit' over the amount of dinosaurs in the game.
Edit:

(https://d1vnh8mbrp67em.cloudfront.net/image/file/2/d8/90362/large_jw.png)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr.Turok on Mar 17, 2018, 06:38:43 PM
Quote from: Gate on Mar 17, 2018, 06:14:00 PM
Colin Trevorrow said we're gonna 'lose our shit' over the amount of dinosaurs in the game.
We better get Spinosaurus in this game bruh I swear!  :D

Oh and I have no idea if someone mentioned this cool new fact but apparently ol' Rexy/Rexie's real name is actually 'Roberta,' according to storyboards of the first Jurassic Park film from Phil Tippett's auction in 2016

(https://i.imgur.com/ZcUQvRS.jpg)

I dig the name and it kind of makes sense, since she is a female dino born in the Costa Rican area lol! Ms Roberta Rexie, I buy it
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Mar 20, 2018, 10:21:44 AM
Better than the cancer name 'Rexy' at least
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Mar 25, 2018, 09:35:03 PM
https://twitter.com/FilmBayona/status/977819844233089024
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Mar 25, 2018, 10:04:57 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAodUWuAk1k

Spoiler
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57tCKqSij5w
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Mar 29, 2018, 06:29:16 PM
Bumping

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reBwjqOhu-g

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKfv43e8Xfs
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 30, 2018, 09:51:52 AM
Such a perfect JP game!

I've already pre-ordered
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Mar 30, 2018, 07:02:38 PM
Look who back for JW3

https://www.cbr.com/colin-trevorrow-direct-jurassic-world-3/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Mar 31, 2018, 02:33:31 PM
Quote from: Russ840 on Mar 30, 2018, 07:02:38 PM
Look who back for JW3

https://www.cbr.com/colin-trevorrow-direct-jurassic-world-3/

Hope it can still change though
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 01, 2018, 12:54:54 PM
Quote from: Russ840 on Mar 30, 2018, 07:02:38 PM
Look who back for JW3

https://www.cbr.com/colin-trevorrow-direct-jurassic-world-3/

Damn straight! He knocked it out of the park with JW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on Apr 01, 2018, 12:58:20 PM
He was bland and replaceable.

IMO
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Apr 01, 2018, 03:04:24 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 01, 2018, 12:54:54 PM
Quote from: Russ840 on Mar 30, 2018, 07:02:38 PM
Look who back for JW3

https://www.cbr.com/colin-trevorrow-direct-jurassic-world-3/

Damn straight! He knocked it out of the park with JW.
Very pleased with this news as well!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Apr 02, 2018, 10:33:58 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 01, 2018, 12:54:54 PM
Quote from: Russ840 on Mar 30, 2018, 07:02:38 PM
Look who back for JW3

https://www.cbr.com/colin-trevorrow-direct-jurassic-world-3/

Agreed

Damn straight! He knocked it out of the park with JW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 04, 2018, 06:56:20 PM
https://twitter.com/DinoProtectGrp/status/981577398335496193

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DZ9DbgyWAAAnyra.jpg:large)

Tyrannosaur is looking gooood!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr.Turok on Apr 05, 2018, 06:20:45 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 04, 2018, 06:56:20 PM
https://twitter.com/DinoProtectGrp/status/981577398335496193

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DZ9DbgyWAAAnyra.jpg:large)

Tyrannosaur is looking gooood!

I can't help but wonder what will be Roberta's role in this movie? I mean if it fought the IndoRaptor, that would be a 2 minute fight tops. I can't count the scenes where she woke up and roared at a helicopter as not all scenes from a trailer make it into the movie.

And I saw that Site B vid, and the guy is right:

Spoiler
How can all the dinos in Site B be dead? Both the US and Costa Rican government had stamped it under official joint government protection as a natural game preserve backed with public support. How in the hell was this accomplished? And how did they manage to get a huge island full of dinosaurs back to Nublar with the entire population intact? They couldn't get all the dinosaurs in since then, especially if they repopulated so quickly. Unless the files they obtain was falsified by upper management for their own ends and Sorna has a strong dino population. Theories, ideas, and thoughts, I like this feeling of interest!
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on Apr 05, 2018, 06:33:38 AM
Spoiler
Lysine deficiency finally got them, maybe? From what I remember in the book the only reason it didn't kill them is they were free-roaming; the herbivores got it from the plants and the carnivores got it from the herbivores.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Apr 05, 2018, 07:20:27 AM
Quote from: Mr.Turok on Apr 05, 2018, 06:20:45 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 04, 2018, 06:56:20 PM
https://twitter.com/DinoProtectGrp/status/981577398335496193

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DZ9DbgyWAAAnyra.jpg:large)

Tyrannosaur is looking gooood!

I can't help but wonder what will be Roberta's role in this movie? I mean if it fought the IndoRaptor, that would be a 2 minute fight tops. I can't count the scenes where she woke up and roared at a helicopter as not all scenes from a trailer make it into the movie.

And I saw that Site B vid, and the guy is right:

Spoiler
How can all the dinos in Site B be dead? Both the US and Costa Rican government had stamped it under official joint government protection as a natural game preserve backed with public support. How in the hell was this accomplished? And how did they manage to get a huge island full of dinosaurs back to Nublar with the entire population intact? They couldn't get all the dinosaurs in since then, especially if they repopulated so quickly. Unless the files they obtain was falsified by upper management for their own ends and Sorna has a strong dino population. Theories, ideas, and thoughts, I like this feeling of interest!
[close]

Honestly, please no more fights with Roberta. The fight scene in JW was cool but it looked too fake (the movements were too smooth and fluent for animals that size, whereas it looked more realistic in JP3). And it would feel a bit too much of a good thing. I hope she has a large role, but that's the fanboy in me talking. And please no more "saves" by her. In Jurassic Park she was a menace and an on screen terror, in good way. Let's keep it that way and not huggable please.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Apr 05, 2018, 08:07:57 AM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on Apr 05, 2018, 07:20:27 AMThe fight scene in JW was cool but it looked too fake (the movements were too smooth and fluent for animals that size, whereas it looked more realistic in JP3).

I hate JP III, but this is so true. The dino fight in that at least felt like animals brawling, instead of a silly monster movie fight.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Cruentus on Apr 05, 2018, 10:36:45 AM
The third film is not my fave either but the fight scenes were not that realistic, T-Rex's bite force was tremendous, the moment it bit the Spinosaurus on the neck, the sheer crushing force should have killed Spino, in fact some say it should have almost been decapitated by the bite. There is a lot of controversy around that scene so I won't speak too much about.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 05, 2018, 12:49:58 PM
This sums it up very nicely...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpNoAGLNNvA
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Apr 05, 2018, 01:57:19 PM
Quote from: The Cruentus on Apr 05, 2018, 10:36:45 AM
The third film is not my fave either but the fight scenes were not that realistic, T-Rex's bite force was tremendous, the moment it bit the Spinosaurus on the neck, the sheer crushing force should have killed Spino, in fact some say it should have almost been decapitated by the bite. There is a lot of controversy around that scene so I won't speak too much about.

Why not speak out? I find it interesting.

My point was actually the motions of the animals (aside of how realistic their actions were), it looked far more realistic in JP3. The animals are massive and carry around allot of weight, which is well portrayed in JP3. Two collosal forces colliding.
Spoiler

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F78.media.tumblr.com%2Fdd5060009613fb5cf6c589add8e2ce07%2Ftumblr_njzt7cP2tL1u5tn07o6_400.gif&hash=159d70c013a492fafb4e1872a28c750ae92c2cbd)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F78.media.tumblr.com%2F406ad1f3619d1141f0408095e70baa27%2Ftumblr_njzt7cP2tL1u5tn07o2_400.gif&hash=ff2a7232b77fa654fe0bebfd064c6c69f1747793)
[close]

In Jurassic World the movements are WAY WAY too fluent and smooth for animals that size, which gives it a total unrealistic feel. Animals that size can most definitly not move that fluently as if they don't carry any weight around. Kind of weird, it's a multi million dollar movie and there was nobody on their team who look at the scene and thought, this doesnt feel as bulky and massive as it should?
Spoiler

(https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/jurrassic-wolrd/images/b/bf/Tumblr_nx4ftcj7rI1u5tn07o4_500.gif)
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.comicvine.com%2Fuploads%2Foriginal%2F14%2F147508%2F4887776-i%2Brex%2Bdurability%2B%285%29.gif&hash=158ba7d08430485c618c19931194fc11b571523e)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Apr 05, 2018, 05:04:01 PM
Yes, I feel in World the animators over-animated them.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 05, 2018, 08:31:59 PM
I didn't see a difference at all.

Over all JW's fight sequence was way more engaging for me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Apr 06, 2018, 01:15:39 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 05, 2018, 08:31:59 PM
I didn't see a difference at all.

Over all JW's fight sequence was way more engaging for me.

The quick snappings of the T Rex alone are way too lightly and quick for an animal that size, let alone the quick movements or throwings.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Apr 06, 2018, 05:51:39 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKDeaazray8
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 06, 2018, 06:17:36 PM
Quote from: The Cruentus on Apr 05, 2018, 10:36:45 AM
The third film is not my fave either but the fight scenes were not that realistic, T-Rex's bite force was tremendous, the moment it bit the Spinosaurus on the neck, the sheer crushing force should have killed Spino, in fact some say it should have almost been decapitated by the bite. There is a lot of controversy around that scene so I won't speak too much about.
That's not the point at hand

the animation in JP3 looks and feels weighty with a proper sense of mass. The things look like real animals of that size duking it out - unlike JW. The only part of that sequence that sort of breaks the illusion is when the spino breaks the t.rex's neck, which is a very articulate action for an animal to do; but the rest of the sequence is excellently animated
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 06, 2018, 10:10:28 PM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on Apr 06, 2018, 01:15:39 PM
The quick snappings of the T Rex alone are way too lightly and quick for an animal that size

Which ones?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Apr 06, 2018, 11:02:30 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Apr 06, 2018, 10:10:28 PM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on Apr 06, 2018, 01:15:39 PM
The quick snappings of the T Rex alone are way too lightly and quick for an animal that size

Which ones?

The ones I posted in the second animated gif of the fight of the Rex vs Indominous.

After the camera pans back from Claire to the animals they try to bite eachothers necks, the movements of the heads against eachother when they try to bite and snapping of the jaws are way too fluent and fast for animals that size, along with most of the movements in general. This also goes for the throw of the Indominlous by the Rex. This almosf feels weightless and thus unrealistic and takes me out of the scene because it feels totally off.

It also makes me feel that it isnt the same Rex as JP1 which she should be, the Rex is also 20+ years old in the movie and moves more fluenlty then she did in JP1
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 07, 2018, 07:29:39 AM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on Apr 05, 2018, 01:57:19 PM
http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/14/147508/4887776-i+rex+durability+(5).gif

I still don't see it, the speed of the bites looks fine to me. Plus thats a hideously jerky gif :laugh:

The Rex throwing the Indominus down is a tad light, but for me it's not an experience altering thing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Apr 07, 2018, 08:59:24 AM
Im not basing my opinion on a jerky gif lol, its to show which scene I meant. But lets agree to disagree.

Quote from: Omegamorph on Apr 06, 2018, 06:17:36 PM
Quote from: The Cruentus on Apr 05, 2018, 10:36:45 AM
The third film is not my fave either but the fight scenes were not that realistic, T-Rex's bite force was tremendous, the moment it bit the Spinosaurus on the neck, the sheer crushing force should have killed Spino, in fact some say it should have almost been decapitated by the bite. There is a lot of controversy around that scene so I won't speak too much about.
That's not the point at hand

the animation in JP3 looks and feels weighty with a proper sense of mass. The things look like real animals of that size duking it out - unlike JW. The only part of that sequence that sort of breaks the illusion is when the spino breaks the t.rex's neck, which is a very articulate action for an animal to do; but the rest of the sequence is excellently animated

This is what I meant, in JP3 it felt massive.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Cruentus on Apr 07, 2018, 12:17:12 PM
Quote from: Omegamorph on Apr 06, 2018, 06:17:36 PM
Quote from: The Cruentus on Apr 05, 2018, 10:36:45 AM
The third film is not my fave either but the fight scenes were not that realistic, T-Rex's bite force was tremendous, the moment it bit the Spinosaurus on the neck, the sheer crushing force should have killed Spino, in fact some say it should have almost been decapitated by the bite. There is a lot of controversy around that scene so I won't speak too much about.
That's not the point at hand

the animation in JP3 looks and feels weighty with a proper sense of mass. The things look like real animals of that size duking it out - unlike JW. The only part of that sequence that sort of breaks the illusion is when the spino breaks the t.rex's neck, which is a very articulate action for an animal to do; but the rest of the sequence is excellently animated

True, I wasn't questioning the movements, just the fight itself.  I suppose one thing to keep in mind is that none of them are dinosaurs, they are all genetically engineered hybrids, they are not how they should be. Velociraptors for example were not that big, they were knee or hip height Ithink.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Apr 07, 2018, 12:56:36 PM
The quivering connective tissue in the corner of their jaws makes me cringe every time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 07, 2018, 02:31:55 PM
Quote from: The Cruentus on Apr 07, 2018, 12:17:12 PM
I suppose one thing to keep in mind is that none of them are dinosaurs, they are all genetically engineered hybrids, they are not how they should be. Velociraptors for example were not that big, they were knee or hip height Ithink.

Not meaning to lash out at you in particular Cruentus, because it's been perpetuated by the filmmakers, but I'm so sick of this excuse. It's a crutch for lazy research. People didn't go to see Jurassic Park because it was a film about genetically engineered hybrids, they went to see it because it was a film about dinosaurs. And for the most part, its portrayals were state-of-the-art, plus a few fanciful/speculative embellishments.

(Regarding the Velociraptor example. At the time the book/film were made, it was known that there were dromaeosaurids around that size, they just hadn't been formally described or named yet. If Michael Crichton had been writing Jurassic Park today, the animal would be called Achillobator.)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Apr 07, 2018, 04:50:41 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Apr 07, 2018, 02:31:55 PM
(Regarding the Velociraptor example. At the time the book/film were made, it was known that there were dromaeosaurids around that size, they just hadn't been formally described or named yet. If Michael Crichton had been writing Jurassic Park today, the animal would be called Achillobator.)
You sure it wasnt Deinonychus https://sites.google.com/a/pdx.edu/deinonychus-antirrhopus/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 07, 2018, 05:46:49 PM
Physical appearance was based on Deinonychus because it was the largest dromaeosaurid described at the time. But the book actually makes a point of stating that it's not Deinonychus, and there's still a big size difference. In terms of weight, real Velociraptor was similar to a Staffordshire terrier, Deinonychus to a leopard, Achillobator to a grizzly bear and Utahraptor to a polar bear.

Just to add further confusion, Michael Crichton's primary source for the dinosaurs in Jurassic Park was Gregory S. Paul, who's notorious for dubiously lumping different animals together into one classification (he's also one of the leading minds behind the dinosaur renaissance and arguably the most influential palaeoartist of all time, so credit where it's due). One of Paul's least viable ideas was to combine most of the known dromaeosaurids into one genus - so Deinonychus antirrhopus became Velociraptor antirrhopus, despite the two animals living on different continents 30 million years apart, with major anatomical differences. He actually stated this as fact in Predatory Dinosaurs Of The World, so Crichton used it too. Under this classification system, the large Mongolian dromaeosaurid remains would almost certainly have been named as a species of Velociraptor when officially described, rather than the Achillobator giganticus that we ended up with when the fossils were finally described in 1998.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Cruentus on Apr 07, 2018, 05:50:29 PM
y
Quote from: Vertigo on Apr 07, 2018, 02:31:55 PM
Quote from: The Cruentus on Apr 07, 2018, 12:17:12 PM
I suppose one thing to keep in mind is that none of them are dinosaurs, they are all genetically engineered hybrids, they are not how they should be. Velociraptors for example were not that big, they were knee or hip height Ithink.

Not meaning to lash out at you in particular Cruentus, because it's been perpetuated by the filmmakers, but I'm so sick of this excuse. It's a crutch for lazy research. People didn't go to see Jurassic Park because it was a film about genetically engineered hybrids, they went to see it because it was a film about dinosaurs. And for the most part, its portrayals were state-of-the-art, plus a few fanciful/speculative embellishments.

(Regarding the Velociraptor example. At the time the book/film were made, it was known that there were dromaeosaurids around that size, they just hadn't been formally described or named yet. If Michael Crichton had been writing Jurassic Park today, the animal would be called Achillobator.)

Its not an excuse, the first film itself makes it clear that they are not true dinosaurs i.e having to use frog dna to fill the gaps, its the real life experts' problem for not paying attention, hence why you have Dr. Wu forced to spell it out in the forth film. One can easily expect the audience not to care and just enjoy the movie, nothing wrong with that, I'm one of them. But some dino experts went on about it, forgetting the whole frog dna and changing sex thing.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 07, 2018, 08:28:23 PM
New trailer classified:

Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom (trailer #3)   PG   Apr 05, 2018   2:30   Universal Pictures
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 07, 2018, 08:56:56 PM
Quote from: The Cruentus on Apr 07, 2018, 05:50:29 PM
Old posts
Quote from: Vertigo on Apr 07, 2018, 02:31:55 PM
Quote from: The Cruentus on Apr 07, 2018, 12:17:12 PM
I suppose one thing to keep in mind is that none of them are dinosaurs, they are all genetically engineered hybrids, they are not how they should be. Velociraptors for example were not that big, they were knee or hip height Ithink.

Not meaning to lash out at you in particular Cruentus, because it's been perpetuated by the filmmakers, but I'm so sick of this excuse. It's a crutch for lazy research. People didn't go to see Jurassic Park because it was a film about genetically engineered hybrids, they went to see it because it was a film about dinosaurs. And for the most part, its portrayals were state-of-the-art, plus a few fanciful/speculative embellishments.

(Regarding the Velociraptor example. At the time the book/film were made, it was known that there were dromaeosaurids around that size, they just hadn't been formally described or named yet. If Michael Crichton had been writing Jurassic Park today, the animal would be called Achillobator.)
[close]

Its not an excuse, the first film itself makes it clear that they are not true dinosaurs i.e having to use frog dna to fill the gaps, its the real life experts' problem for not paying attention, hence why you have Dr. Wu forced to spell it out in the forth film. One can easily expect the audience not to care and just enjoy the movie, nothing wrong with that, I'm one of them. But some dino experts went on about it, forgetting the whole frog dna and changing sex thing.

The fact that it's being used as an in-universe explanation is part of the point. In the original film, genetic manipulation was only a mechanism to make the resurrection plausible and allow the animals to break InGen's control. It wasn't an excuse to allow the filmmakers to skip their research and wrap decades' old material in a shell of modern CGI.

I know I've said this before, but it's just ridiculous: these are dinosaur movies which are no longer interested in presenting dinosaurs. Jurassic Park changed the world by showing people how much had changed in palaeontology since the lumbering, cold-blooded dimwits shown in cinemas in previous decades - breathing life into a field that had been considered dead, and attracting vast numbers of people to take an interest in science. Two decades later, there are something like 10x the number of working palaeontologists, and you often hear researchers in other fields saying that Jurassic Park inspired them to get started. The new films are not living up to that legacy. Hell, the first one popularised the idea that birds could have been related to dinosaurs, and now that we know that birds are literally living dinosaurs, the series won't even show any feathers, let alone mention that fact.

JW was the perfect opportunity to implement new animals with up-to-date science, as they needed to clone another batch anyway. They settled for nostalgia over living up to the actual legacy of that first film. It's really shameful, and an indictment on modern cinema.

(That said, I'll still be watching the next ones. JW might be a shitty dinosaur film but it's a reasonably entertaining action movie.)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr.Turok on Apr 08, 2018, 03:03:26 AM
Quote from: blood. on Apr 07, 2018, 12:56:36 PM
The quivering connective tissue in the corner of their jaws makes me cringe every time.

How? Badly animated or just weird to look at?

Quote from: Vertigo on Apr 07, 2018, 08:56:56 PM
I know I've said this before, but it's just ridiculous: these are dinosaur movies which are no longer interested in presenting dinosaurs. Jurassic Park changed the world by showing people how much had changed in palaeontology since the lumbering, cold-blooded dimwits shown in cinemas in previous decades - breathing life into a field that had been considered dead, and attracting vast numbers of people to take an interest in science. Two decades later, there are something like 10x the number of working palaeontologists, and you often hear researchers in other fields saying that Jurassic Park inspired them to get started. The new films are not living up to that legacy. Hell, the first one popularised the idea that birds could have been related to dinosaurs, and now that we know that birds are literally living dinosaurs, the series won't even show any feathers, let alone mention that fact.

JW was the perfect opportunity to implement new animals with up-to-date science, as they needed to clone another batch anyway. They settled for nostalgia over living up to the actual legacy of that first film. It's really shameful, and an indictment on modern cinema.

(That said, I'll still be watching the next ones. JW might be a shitty dinosaur film but it's a reasonably entertaining action movie.)

They did. In this scene, both Dr.Wu and Masrani are arguing about the I-Rex and pure dinosaur DNA.

"Nothing in Jurassic World is natural. We have always filled gaps in the genome with the DNA of other animals. And if their genetic code was pure, many of them look quite different. But you didn't ask for reality, you asked for more teeth." -Dr. Henry Wu

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XaVcjYbO3B0
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 08, 2018, 08:14:22 AM
That's rather vaguer than what I meant.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on Apr 08, 2018, 08:21:54 AM
The problem is they got stuck in a corner with the look. When JP was new, their designs were revolutionary. Now, they're almost as outdated as the old upright, tail-dragging dinosaurs of O'Brien made for the original 1920s The Lost World.

But that's now what people expect them to look like, at least in this fictional film franchise. If they came out with chicken dinosaurs, many people would be turned off regardless of the accuracy. Henry Wu lampshading the fact that, no, this isn't what dinosaurs "actually" looked like is probably the best they could do to reconcile the fact that we know now that the look is wrong.

And realistically if you're going to drag scientific advancements post-JP into the series, you couldn't ignore the fact that we now know that DNA is completely destroyed in less than 10 million years in absolutely ideal conditions.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Apr 08, 2018, 01:44:43 PM
^Not all would be chicken dinos if they wanted to be accurate. The dinos have bad anatomy in general, feathers wouldn't be a fix-all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: 426Buddy on Apr 08, 2018, 03:21:18 PM
I can empathize with both sides, not sure where i fall. Sil made a lot of good points. I would love to see more accurate dinos on screen but it would be weird for me in a JP film.

I feel its time for new live action dino films other than Jurassic Park movies. Ones using our current scientific understanding of what they look like. Also i would love a big budget dino horror movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naissus on Apr 08, 2018, 03:35:10 PM
Quote from: 426Buddy on Apr 08, 2018, 03:21:18 PM
I can empathize with both sides, not sure where i fall. Sil made a lot of good points. I would love to see more accurate dinos on screen but it would be weird for me in a JP film.

I feel its time for new live action dino films other than Jurassic Park movies. Ones using our current scientific understanding of what they look like. Also i would love a big budget dino horror movie.

Need a Dino Crisis type story.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 08, 2018, 06:02:44 PM
Quote from: SiL on Apr 08, 2018, 08:21:54 AMBut that's now what people expect them to look like, at least in this fictional film franchise. If they came out with chicken dinosaurs, many people would be turned off regardless of the accuracy. Henry Wu lampshading the fact that, no, this isn't what dinosaurs "actually" looked like is probably the best they could do to reconcile the fact that we know now that the look is wrong.

The thing is, they've changed the designs in every film anyway. Sometimes it's just a recolouration, sometimes it's a reshaped bodypart, sometimes it's a complete redesign, sometimes it's giving teeth to something whose name literally means "toothless wing". Take a look at the raptors (http://i.imgur.com/YJ9MG3T.jpg) and Gallimimus (http://78.media.tumblr.com/79e89f3727c4b4e408ad873b8dd3ba1e/tumblr_nhtiswqiV61r78xioo1_400.png) in the older films and compare with JW, they look different enough to give them a distinct character. With that in mind, it would have been no problem for anyone if they'd just made some effort and implemented correct limb orientation. Or given pycnofibres to the pterosaurs, which are only briefly glimpsed during the film and had been redesigned anyway.

There's also the possibility of introducing new species, which isn't hard given that there are over a thousand to choose from. Why not add, say, Dakotaraptor, and make it look more like a giant eagle with teeth and wing claws than a bipedal monitor lizard. Doesn't mean they're retconning the old animals, and could even have made a plot point of pitting them against a leftover clutch of the old 'Velociraptor'. Hell, if they're that opposed to anything without scales, most dinosaurs didn't have dinofuzz - we're not even sure about Tyrannosaurus, despite it having hairy ancestors.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Apr 08, 2018, 06:28:55 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Apr 08, 2018, 06:02:44 PM
Quote from: SiL on Apr 08, 2018, 08:21:54 AMBut that's now what people expect them to look like, at least in this fictional film franchise. If they came out with chicken dinosaurs, many people would be turned off regardless of the accuracy. Henry Wu lampshading the fact that, no, this isn't what dinosaurs "actually" looked like is probably the best they could do to reconcile the fact that we know now that the look is wrong.

The thing is, they've changed the designs in every film anyway. Sometimes it's just a recolouration, sometimes it's a reshaped bodypart, sometimes it's a complete redesign, sometimes it's giving teeth to something whose name literally means "toothless wing". Take a look at the raptors (http://i.imgur.com/YJ9MG3T.jpg) and Gallimimus (http://78.media.tumblr.com/79e89f3727c4b4e408ad873b8dd3ba1e/tumblr_nhtiswqiV61r78xioo1_400.png) in the older films and compare with JW, they look different enough to give them a distinct character. With that in mind, it would have been no problem for anyone if they'd just made some effort and implemented correct limb orientation. Or given pycnofibres to the pterosaurs, which are only briefly glimpsed during the film and had been redesigned anyway.

There's also the possibility of introducing new species, which isn't hard given that there are over a thousand to choose from. Why not add, say, Dakotaraptor, and make it look more like a giant eagle with teeth and wing claws than a bipedal monitor lizard. Doesn't mean they're retconning the old animals, and could even have made a plot point of pitting them against a leftover clutch of the old 'Velociraptor'. Hell, if they're that opposed to anything without scales, most dinosaurs didn't have dinofuzz - we're not even sure about Tyrannosaurus, despite it having hairy ancestors.
Something they could have always done with dinosaurs becoming open a pure. Have Ingen stick to their designs and have other companies trying to make accurate dinos. Both sides win.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr.Turok on Apr 08, 2018, 06:30:17 PM
Quote from: SiL on Apr 08, 2018, 08:21:54 AM
The problem is they got stuck in a corner with the look. When JP was new, their designs were revolutionary. Now, they're almost as outdated as the old upright, tail-dragging dinosaurs of O'Brien made for the original 1920s The Lost World.

But that's now what people expect them to look like, at least in this fictional film franchise. If they came out with chicken dinosaurs, many people would be turned off regardless of the accuracy. Henry Wu lampshading the fact that, no, this isn't what dinosaurs "actually" looked like is probably the best they could do to reconcile the fact that we know now that the look is wrong.

And realistically if you're going to drag scientific advancements post-JP into the series, you couldn't ignore the fact that we now know that DNA is completely destroyed in less than 10 million years in absolutely ideal conditions.

What's funny is that actual accuracy of dinosaurs was even touched upon the novel itself, with Hammond and Wu discussing about giving the crowd authentic dinosaurs.

Dr. Wu wanted to make the dinosaurs slower for his proposed Version 4.4 of dinosaur batches because he felt that they were "too fast", which would fail to convince visitors due to them not being accustomed to seeing large animals move as fast as the clones. Hammond disagreed, wishing to give them the real deal.  Ironic that you guys argued that the fight scenes in JW that the dinos moved too quickly. I mean has anyone seen a charging rhino, hippo, or elephant before?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Su7GkqwxG08
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 09, 2018, 04:53:07 PM
Quote from: Mr.Turok on Apr 08, 2018, 06:30:17 PM
Dr. Wu wanted to make the dinosaurs slower for his proposed Version 4.4 of dinosaur batches because he felt that they were "too fast", which would fail to convince visitors due to them not being accustomed to seeing large animals move as fast as the clones. Hammond disagreed, wishing to give them the real deal.  Ironic that you guys argued that the fight scenes in JW that the dinos moved too quickly.

(https://i.imgur.com/w3hUyFC.gif)

Quote from: Vertigo on Apr 07, 2018, 02:31:55 PM
I'm so sick of this excuse. It's a crutch for lazy research. People didn't go to see Jurassic Park because it was a film about genetically engineered hybrids, they went to see it because it was a film about dinosaurs.

(https://thumbs.gfycat.com/AgileOptimalAmericancrayfish-max-1mb.gif)
"They're dinosaurs, wow enough."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Apr 12, 2018, 09:02:15 AM
"Jurassic World 2 Rating Promises Intense Dinosaur Violence"

Rated PG-13

https://movieweb.com/jurassic-world-fallen-kingdom-rating-pg13-reasons/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Apr 13, 2018, 08:52:41 PM
A new spot with some new sequences

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OogedrOiq8I
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Apr 13, 2018, 10:45:39 PM
The first trailer that actually made me excited! That Mosasaur scene looks wow!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 17, 2018, 11:44:32 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DbBaeRbVMAUwdIB.jpg:large)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Apr 18, 2018, 07:48:28 AM
The final trailer is going up today, isn't it?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 18, 2018, 11:49:26 AM
Here's the actual size of the image from the poster:

https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/793/27662837598_47215665c9_o.jpg

Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Apr 18, 2018, 07:48:28 AM
The final trailer is going up today, isn't it?

Yep!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 18, 2018, 03:08:07 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FJD7jZqZEk
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr.Turok on Apr 18, 2018, 03:46:25 PM
I really hated that they revealed the crucial plot point of the movie. I wanted to feel the surprise I had now at the movies dammit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: skhellter on Apr 18, 2018, 03:48:50 PM
super spoilery but will put butts in seats.

best trailer out of the 3.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Cruentus on Apr 18, 2018, 04:12:52 PM
Quote from: skhellter on Apr 18, 2018, 03:48:50 PM
super spoilery but will put butts in seats.

Actually, I think it will be best if everyone will "hold on to their butts"  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: dallevalle on Apr 18, 2018, 04:18:53 PM
oh god am i the only one who can see this ? ( jurrasic world = transformers ) it looks so meh xD
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Apr 18, 2018, 04:30:13 PM
Reveal much? They literally showed EVERYTHING there was to show! And that whole
Spoiler
tamed raptor storyline with blue just feels so lame, its just putting me off so bad. It doesnt feel realistic at all. A raptor as a pet...? They used to be terrifying whenever they were on screen, now its just laughable.. [^spoiler]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Apr 18, 2018, 04:51:48 PM
Hold on, you guys felt "spoiled" by plotlines started in Jurassic World? You really didn't suspect that
Spoiler
Dino auctions and Indoraptor were a thing?
[close]

I want whatever rock you're hiding under.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Apr 18, 2018, 05:05:24 PM
No, they showed exactly how all the scenes will play out

Spoiler
The scene with Blue at the old JP1 car from the kids, the Mosausaur and the Indiminous skeleton, the whole Rex waking up scene, everything thatll happen at the mansion and more.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 18, 2018, 05:53:39 PM
Trust me, this is the tip of the iceberg.

Bring on June!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Apr 18, 2018, 05:56:07 PM
It's also pretty obvious to me that the Mutagen Raptor will
Spoiler
crash through that roof and ends up dead on the spikes of the Trike skull
[close]

Baffles me that some cgi shots (rex and Indo in cage) look so awesome and others like Blue (just before WU's lab blows up) look absolutely ridiculous. You see Chris' face in that same shot... it's so weird it looks cgi-ed as well!


Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Apr 18, 2018, 07:22:49 PM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on Apr 18, 2018, 04:30:13 PMAnd that whole
Spoiler
tamed raptor storyline with blue just feels so lame, its just putting me off so bad. It doesnt feel realistic at all. A raptor as a pet...? They used to be terrifying whenever they were on screen, now its just laughable.. [^spoiler]
[close]
Yeah, I hated that in the last one, and it looks even more silly in this.

I won't bother.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: bobby brown on Apr 18, 2018, 07:28:20 PM
The new "indoraptor" seems just ludicrously evil, "satanosaurus" I hear was the working name for it or "Hitlerodon"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Apr 18, 2018, 07:58:33 PM
I liked it, a few cool shots in there
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Apr 18, 2018, 08:52:33 PM
I was wondering.... the Indoraptor is male... and
Spoiler
Blue is female.... and there are no more raptors other than Blue and they are very eager to get her. Will she breed with it? Because I have seen Fallen Kingdom merchandise that shows 4 baby raptors (3 with blue stripes just like Blue and one with a blue blob on the side)

(https://s7.postimg.cc/53uu73dsb/20180411_211506.png)


The new Owen funko pop also includes a raptor hatching from its egg.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on Apr 18, 2018, 09:10:20 PM
Hey surprise... I liked the trailer; this might actually be cool.

But yeah, trained blue just feels so out of place, but I'm willing to go with it just because I think some cool Indoraptor vs Velociraptor shots are coming.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr.Turok on Apr 18, 2018, 11:48:17 PM
I don't understand the whole hate for Blue/Owen bond. Its an animal, not a monster. A predatory wired social animal, like wolves. Raised from birth by Owen, who has been off on her own for years and finally back with her long lost family member. Its no surprise that Blue became super loyal after everything they've been through.

Its not far fetched, and seeing how in this universe that Raptors are smarter than dolphins, whales and even primates, there is little to wonder why Blue under her own choice sticks with Owen.

Plus...have you seen real life? Like Pocho the Crocodile. Croc was loyal to his man to death via old age. And Crocs are cold blooded killers that hold little to no thought of social interaction or other meaningless traits like that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXv-KIDxjlY


Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Apr 18, 2018, 11:49:49 PM
Also, the concept of "alphas" is completely false. Family units are family units.
https://www.bustle.com/articles/99560-is-the-alpha-male-a-myth-the-science-behind-the-concept-explained

http://www.businessinsider.com/no-such-thing-alpha-male-2016-10
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Apr 19, 2018, 12:47:50 AM
Quote from: Mr.Turok on Apr 18, 2018, 11:48:17 PM
I don't understand the whole hate for Blue/Owen bond. Its an animal, not a monster. A predatory wired social animal, like wolves. Raised from birth by Owen, who has been off on her own for years and finally back with her long lost family member. Its no surprise that Blue became super loyal after everything they've been through.

Its not far fetched, and seeing how in this universe that Raptors are smarter than dolphins, whales and even primates, there is little to wonder why Blue under her own choice sticks with Owen.

Plus...have you seen real life? Like Pocho the Crocodile. Croc was loyal to his man to death via old age. And Crocs are cold blooded killers that hold little to no thought of social interaction or other meaningless traits like that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXv-KIDxjlY

Ever heard of Timothy Treadwell?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: skhellter on Apr 19, 2018, 12:56:16 AM
Quote from: Gate on Apr 18, 2018, 11:49:49 PM
Also, the concept of "alphas" is completely false. Family units are family units.
https://www.bustle.com/articles/99560-is-the-alpha-male-a-myth-the-science-behind-the-concept-explained

http://www.businessinsider.com/no-such-thing-alpha-male-2016-10

...and?

i also have bad news about the science behind the concept of jurassic park....  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Apr 19, 2018, 01:19:46 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Apr 18, 2018, 03:08:07 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FJD7jZqZEk

Sold. This is how you do a trailer. I feel spoiled, and I love it. Now I know I'll be seeing something worth my money.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Jigsaw85 on Apr 19, 2018, 04:26:02 AM
Looks like Jurassic Park Meets Resident Evil. Genetic experimentation going on in a mansion? Mutant freaks running around, a red-head named Claire, there's even a ship named Arcadia. Could be fun, hopefully this one will be memorable unlike the last one.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Apr 19, 2018, 07:50:50 AM
Wait so out of all the possible plots...

Spoiler
it's black market dinos in the fallen kingdom? Damn that is boring as dirt.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 19, 2018, 08:11:02 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Apr 19, 2018, 07:50:50 AM
Wait so out of all the possible plots...

Spoiler
it's black market dinos in the fallen kingdom? Damn that is boring as dirt.
[close]

Then call me a Pedologist.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Apr 19, 2018, 10:17:06 AM
Another trailer with more footage... much better trailer overall.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyrTpCDvank
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Apr 19, 2018, 11:35:02 AM
A much better trailer indeed, it got me psyched for Roberta/ Rexy back in action! I'll always have a soft spot since she really represents almost all of my childhood!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rudiger on Apr 19, 2018, 11:57:10 AM
Meh. The last one was crap. This looks crappier.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KillCrites on Apr 19, 2018, 12:10:24 PM
Quote from: Rudiger on Apr 19, 2018, 11:57:10 AM
Meh. The last one was crap. This looks crappier.
I think this looks leagues better than JW personally. At least it's not a repeat of the original film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: bobby brown on Apr 19, 2018, 01:13:20 PM
About the indoraptor...

Spoiler
If blue is the base for the Indoraptor, how fast is it created?
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Apr 19, 2018, 02:37:02 PM
Quote from: KillCrites on Apr 19, 2018, 12:10:24 PMI think this looks leagues better than JW personally. At least it's not a repeat of the original film.

No, it's a repeat of the second film lol (mixed with a repeat of the last one in the form of the genetically modified dino).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Apr 19, 2018, 03:20:37 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Apr 19, 2018, 02:37:02 PM
Quote from: KillCrites on Apr 19, 2018, 12:10:24 PMI think this looks leagues better than JW personally. At least it's not a repeat of the original film.

No, it's a repeat of the second film lol (mixed with a repeat of the last one in the form of the genetically modified dino).

Well they wanted to make a new park in the second film on the mainland, more like a zoo, that's not really what is happening here it seems.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Apr 19, 2018, 03:38:38 PM
Quote from: Huggs on Apr 19, 2018, 12:47:50 AM
Quote from: Mr.Turok on Apr 18, 2018, 11:48:17 PM
I don't understand the whole hate for Blue/Owen bond. Its an animal, not a monster. A predatory wired social animal, like wolves. Raised from birth by Owen, who has been off on her own for years and finally back with her long lost family member. Its no surprise that Blue became super loyal after everything they've been through.

Its not far fetched, and seeing how in this universe that Raptors are smarter than dolphins, whales and even primates, there is little to wonder why Blue under her own choice sticks with Owen.

Plus...have you seen real life? Like Pocho the Crocodile. Croc was loyal to his man to death via old age. And Crocs are cold blooded killers that hold little to no thought of social interaction or other meaningless traits like that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXv-KIDxjlY

Ever heard of Timothy Treadwell?

Grizzly Man !
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Apr 19, 2018, 03:51:28 PM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on Apr 19, 2018, 03:20:37 PMWell they wanted to make a new park in the second film on the mainland, more like a zoo, that's not really what is happening here it seems.

The stuff about the new park constituted all of a few lines of dialogue in The Lost World. It was hardly the plot of the movie; the plot was taking dinosaurs from the island, after which they run amuck in a populated setting.

This trailer seems awfully similar to that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 19, 2018, 07:13:46 PM
I'm just pissed off mad they nonchalantly killed off the Sorna dinos.

:-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 19, 2018, 09:11:46 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Apr 19, 2018, 03:51:28 PM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on Apr 19, 2018, 03:20:37 PMWell they wanted to make a new park in the second film on the mainland, more like a zoo, that's not really what is happening here it seems.

The stuff about the new park constituted all of a few lines of dialogue in The Lost World. It was hardly the plot of the movie; the plot was taking dinosaurs from the island, after which they run amuck in a populated setting.

This trailer seems awfully similar to that.

Hopefully this won't have a preachy, half-assed animal rights message on top of it. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Apr 19, 2018, 09:19:40 PM
Pretty good message to preach, so long as a full ass is used.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Apr 20, 2018, 10:02:54 PM
So good! Been wanting a scene like this for years! :laugh:

Spoiler
(https://media.giphy.com/media/SiNJZBRk0eGoFmMYiE/giphy.gif)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr.Turok on Apr 21, 2018, 02:09:40 AM
Quote from: Omegamorph on Apr 19, 2018, 07:13:46 PM
I'm just pissed off mad they nonchalantly killed off the Sorna dinos.

:-\
f**kin same. I mean how did all the Sorna dinos just go off when apparently they grew into a healthy ecosystem in a few years. I mean lets look at the island, its f**kin huge, how are they going to be sure that they all died out? Not to mention that same population wreaked the first crew of hunters/mercenaries that went in 1997 so one would think that another crew jumps in a few years later is going to fair any better in one that grew stronger years ago?

(https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/jurassicpark/images/7/79/Site_B_and_Jurassic_Park.gif/revision/latest/scale-to-width-down/1000?cb=20100517230233)


Not to mention that you think it would be nice to have the Spino back wreaking havoc again and perhaps getting a match with a proper T-Rex, but it just can't be allowed to be that awesome huh...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Apr 21, 2018, 03:02:52 AM
So was that gif of the mosasaur eating up surfers legit or just fish shit?

Yea I forgot to save it before it was d-e-l.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Apr 21, 2018, 07:05:58 AM
Yeah, writing off Sorna is a damn shame. I'd take anything on Sorna over anything these World films offer.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Apr 21, 2018, 05:19:04 PM
Nope. So tired of the islands. Give us something new like a dinosaur-infested mainland already.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr.Turok on Apr 21, 2018, 05:45:50 PM
I just remembered that they wanted Jurassic World to be a trilogy right? So if the dinos are now down to 11 species, and perhaps even lower by the end of Fallen Kingdom, where will this take us next? You think they'll do a twist and follow the human/dino hybrids after all?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 21, 2018, 05:57:54 PM
Velociraptor commandos hunting drug lords, please. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Apr 21, 2018, 11:13:47 PM
Quote from: Gate on Apr 21, 2018, 05:19:04 PM
Nope. So tired of the islands. Give us something new like a dinosaur-infested mainland already.

I agree. Something akin to "dawn of the planet of the apes" perhaps? Being stalked by a t-rex through the ruins of New York, only to wind up in a raptors nest. I could do with some good military vs dinosaur action on the coast.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Apr 21, 2018, 11:58:33 PM
It's been... what, almost 30 years since the first JP? We've been on the islands for 30 years. Alien, Predator, Star Wars and even low budget films have moved on from their roots and continue to innovate. I'm glad that's what we're allegedly seeing in the new movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 22, 2018, 12:18:03 AM
The mansion bits might be the closest thing we get to a proper Resident Evil movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Apr 22, 2018, 08:33:44 AM
Quote from: Gate on Apr 21, 2018, 05:19:04 PM
Nope. So tired of the islands. Give us something new like a dinosaur-infested mainland already.
And that's ok, but why do you have to specifically kill them off?

Ending to 'Lost World' is so beautiful and poetic. :-\
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Apr 22, 2018, 04:54:11 PM
Quote from: Omegamorph on Apr 22, 2018, 08:33:44 AM
Quote from: Gate on Apr 21, 2018, 05:19:04 PM
Nope. So tired of the islands. Give us something new like a dinosaur-infested mainland already.
And that's ok, but why do you have to specifically kill them off?

Ending to 'Lost World' is so beautiful and poetic. :-\
The islands were always on a clock. Without human intervention, Nublar dinos would've been dead due to the lysene deficiency. Sorna has a population of predators too great to sustain itself.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr.Turok on Apr 22, 2018, 07:29:07 PM
Quote from: Gate on Apr 22, 2018, 04:54:11 PM
The islands were always on a clock. Without human intervention, Nublar dinos would've been dead due to the lysene deficiency. Sorna has a population of predators too great to sustain itself.

Half true. Its been already established since Lost World that the herbivorous dinos eaten plants that already have lysine and the carnivores eat those herbivorous, having a self containing ecosystem. If anything, both book and movie canons established that Nublar's volcano was a ticking time bomb and its no coincidence that its now awakening again. So Jurassic Park/World was already doomed from the start.  Ingen's List had more herbivore species than carnivores, we just think there is more carnivores due to the fact that its hollywood as no herbivore would relentlessly hunt down people like carnivores would.

Oh and going back to Fallen Kingdom, someone mentioned that for some strange reason, the Indoraptor has a specific interest on the small girl character, as its always ends up with him staring her down or trying to grab her. I always thought it was just trailer editing and perhaps even natural instincts to hunt after small creatures, but its brought up that she has been aware of the Indoraptor for sometime. Like perhaps she would always visit his cage to feed it or something. Not to mention that if it really wanted to kill her, it would have done so in the bed scene instead of slowly creepin up on her. I don't know but its interesting to think about.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Apr 22, 2018, 09:04:45 PM
Quote from: Mr.Turok on Apr 22, 2018, 07:29:07 PM
Quote from: Gate on Apr 22, 2018, 04:54:11 PM
The islands were always on a clock. Without human intervention, Nublar dinos would've been dead due to the lysene deficiency. Sorna has a population of predators too great to sustain itself.

Half true. Its been already established since Lost World that the herbivorous dinos eaten plants that already have lysine and the carnivores eat those herbivorous, having a self containing ecosystem.
I am discussing Isla Nublar, where lysine was introduced via the irrigated water. Without that system, it would fail and the herbivores would eventually die. It's the same concept as a gel ant farm. You order ants designed to eat only that gel. Introduce an insect from the outside world, they will all die.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr.Turok on Apr 23, 2018, 03:01:52 AM
Quote from: Gate on Apr 22, 2018, 09:04:45 PM
Quote from: Mr.Turok on Apr 22, 2018, 07:29:07 PM
Quote from: Gate on Apr 22, 2018, 04:54:11 PM
The islands were always on a clock. Without human intervention, Nublar dinos would've been dead due to the lysene deficiency. Sorna has a population of predators too great to sustain itself.

Half true. Its been already established since Lost World that the herbivorous dinos eaten plants that already have lysine and the carnivores eat those herbivorous, having a self containing ecosystem.
I am discussing Isla Nublar, where lysine was introduced via the irrigated water. Without that system, it would fail and the herbivores would eventually die. It's the same concept as a gel ant farm. You order ants designed to eat only that gel. Introduce an insect from the outside world, they will all die.
Ah ok that makes sense. Despite some of the game's flaws, I did like how TellTale's game is canon to the series. Would have been interesting to see the Troodons on the big screen.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Apr 23, 2018, 03:33:00 AM
Quote from: Mr.Turok on Apr 23, 2018, 03:01:52 AM
Quote from: Gate on Apr 22, 2018, 09:04:45 PM
Quote from: Mr.Turok on Apr 22, 2018, 07:29:07 PM
Quote from: Gate on Apr 22, 2018, 04:54:11 PM
The islands were always on a clock. Without human intervention, Nublar dinos would've been dead due to the lysene deficiency. Sorna has a population of predators too great to sustain itself.

Half true. Its been already established since Lost World that the herbivorous dinos eaten plants that already have lysine and the carnivores eat those herbivorous, having a self containing ecosystem.
I am discussing Isla Nublar, where lysine was introduced via the irrigated water. Without that system, it would fail and the herbivores would eventually die. It's the same concept as a gel ant farm. You order ants designed to eat only that gel. Introduce an insect from the outside world, they will all die.
Ah ok that makes sense. Despite some of the game's flaws, I did like how TellTale's game is canon to the series. Would have been interesting to see the Troodons on the big screen.
Dear god, the Troodons could give the velociraptors a run for their money.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 23, 2018, 04:27:46 AM
There was a new TV spot that aired during Spurs/Warriors game on ABC this afternoon.  I haven't found it online but did find screen cap of one scene.

Spoiler
https://twitter.com/NimaNeemz/status/988248920227827713
[close]

Spoiler
https://twitter.com/Brycenator100/status/988274484380659713
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Apr 23, 2018, 06:57:23 AM
Oh, so the mosasaur eating surfers is a real thing in the movie. I guess the fallen kingdom is man.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Apr 23, 2018, 09:46:27 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Apr 23, 2018, 04:27:46 AM
There was a new TV spot that aired during Spurs/Warriors game on ABC this afternoon.  I haven't found it online but did find screen cap of one scene.

Spoiler
https://twitter.com/NimaNeemz/status/988248920227827713
[close]

Spoiler
https://twitter.com/Brycenator100/status/988274484380659713
[close]

I'm way too spoiled, but serves me right for looking at the trailers and spots, however if you've seen them all, you basically know how 60-70% of all the scenes will play out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Apr 23, 2018, 08:20:35 PM
Tv spot

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HO-OlBgNaHk
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Apr 23, 2018, 10:19:47 PM
Just received this week's Entertainment Weekly:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fewedit.files.wordpress.com%2F2018%2F04%2Few1512_21376932728370830.jpg&hash=01fe74e4e34155ab23aaf7512acacc2d0dff6a76)

Has a few exclusive pics and tidbits, including
Spoiler
A pinch of Malcolm's testimony to Congress and as far as pics, well...
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FFsq7wRE.jpg&hash=cd233d819f49f969c697894ecdb9cf3222667f03)
Raptor in the Kitchen tribute!!!!  :o :o :o
[close]
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Apr 23, 2018, 10:28:17 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on Apr 23, 2018, 08:20:35 PM
Tv spot

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HO-OlBgNaHk
So...she wants to save the dinosaurs but she's fine with trapping one in a chamber that has lava pouring in. Sorry if I'm being nitpicky, just something that stood out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: skhellter on Apr 23, 2018, 10:38:48 PM
she also doesnt want to die in the process.  :D

which seems fair.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: 426Buddy on Apr 23, 2018, 10:55:04 PM
Yeah, not many people are going to try and save a dinosaur while its literally attempting to eat you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Apr 23, 2018, 11:22:08 PM
Agreed, but you'd think they would have a plan in case of that. They get the Rex just fine so there must be some way to rescue these carnivores.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Apr 26, 2018, 01:26:21 AM
https://twitter.com/DEADLINE/status/989219100550356992
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Apr 26, 2018, 07:39:24 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUR_RlTjC_k
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Apr 26, 2018, 01:03:53 PM
These guys were very excited about the openingscene shown at Cinemacon...  at 19:05

SPOILERS.... duh


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTffJd9CLiU

Amother slightly different tv spot with cgi adjustments

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-oDRMe9RSOw
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 01, 2018, 05:07:51 AM
(https://images2.imgbox.com/91/95/tfNNtR7Q_o.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on May 01, 2018, 05:37:54 AM
Focusing on his face in that last picture, I'd say Pratt looks a lot like Buzz Lightyear on that mag cover. We need a live action toy story movie. Make it a "hard R" too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on May 02, 2018, 05:39:39 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0rZf4fUj70
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 04, 2018, 02:29:27 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeNTCi2ntdE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgwu6rnU1WI
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 04, 2018, 09:34:47 PM
So close. so so close!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on May 04, 2018, 10:41:20 PM
Definitely seeing this in theaters. Super stoked. You know, if Hammond would've invested the same amount of time, money and energy into his park, as Universal is giving this movie, Nedry wouldn't have given him the finger. Spared no expense my fanny.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr.Turok on May 07, 2018, 06:30:18 AM
Quote from: Huggs on May 04, 2018, 10:41:20 PM
Definitely seeing this in theaters. Super stoked. You know, if Hammond would've invested the same amount of time, money and energy into his park, as Universal is giving this movie, Nedry wouldn't have given him the finger. Spared no expense my fanny.

Man if Hammond only knew about how his dinos were going to be used, he'd beat everyone with his amber cane.
"I made the island a nature preserve for f**ks sake and you went to do WHAT???!!"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 09, 2018, 07:05:01 AM
New TV spot really kicks ass! :o

Spoiler
https://vimeo.com/268624925
[close]

This is going to be so much fun.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on May 09, 2018, 08:07:43 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 09, 2018, 07:05:01 AM
New TV spot really kicks ass! :o

Spoiler
https://vimeo.com/268624925
[close]

This is going to be so much fun.

Im so excited that the Rex is getting so much screentime again! She looks awesome in that final shot!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on May 09, 2018, 08:46:11 AM
Meh.

I still think a lot of this looks like it'll be more silly than cool.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on May 09, 2018, 09:18:59 AM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on May 09, 2018, 08:46:11 AM
Meh.

I still think a lot of this looks like it'll be more silly than cool.

Well, it will be quite uncompairable with Jurassic Park and The Lost World imo, this one is more of a cashgrab and entertaining. In terms of storytelling it won't top the 1st two movies.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on May 09, 2018, 09:53:10 AM
I like the feel for this movie a lot more... JW was way too clinical. I see they touched up lots of cgi in that volcano eruption/rex roaring shot... wayyyy better. I hated how artificial and washed out it looked in the first trailer... now there is even a 'little' shockwave.

The openingscene is amazing... very... JP actually. Moody and suspenseful and ok one dinosaur has a very action-y part in it but the build up is very good.

I do however feel parts of this movie will be too much on the silly side... which has to do with the writing. The first 2 movies had very realistic human characters and I just don't feel that with Pratt and Bryce.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on May 09, 2018, 01:57:23 PM
Wow that lion doesn't flinch a bit ! Tough motherf**ker lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 09, 2018, 04:56:26 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on May 09, 2018, 09:53:10 AM
The first 2 movies had very realistic human characters

I'd say the characters are believable for the stories they're telling. More than realistic.


Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 09, 2018, 06:07:46 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJyzbPnlRHE
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on May 09, 2018, 10:18:52 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IS81usmE3-I
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: D88M on May 10, 2018, 12:04:24 PM
The more i see the more i like it actually, it cannot be worse than JW
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on May 10, 2018, 09:37:36 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUYiNOsUmck
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 15, 2018, 08:05:17 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJvUqNi-1nc
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 15, 2018, 11:32:41 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TI0g8lBELUE

http://www.AdoptADino.com  (http://www.adoptadino.com)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on May 16, 2018, 12:20:50 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5L7Iokg5RY

The Civil War has been renewed in less than 30 seconds.  :D This video, oh my god. The comments.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: skhellter on May 16, 2018, 12:24:51 AM
That video was created with the salt of a million man children.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 16, 2018, 01:02:43 AM
Lol they couldn't resist being twatty about the spino.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr.Turok on May 16, 2018, 05:25:38 PM
Funny that I just posted the Spino vid back in the Evolution thread and suddenly Rexy decides to slide in. They really do wanna pickle the fans huh? :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on May 16, 2018, 11:00:36 PM
Quote from: Mr.Turok on May 16, 2018, 05:25:38 PM
Funny that I just posted the Spino vid back in the Evolution thread and suddenly Rexy decides to slide in. They really do wanna pickle the fans huh? :laugh:
I didn't even realize we had an evolution thread. Whoops.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 18, 2018, 03:23:24 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0sMlzw5iU8
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 19, 2018, 05:29:41 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjaqlICVa1w
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr.Turok on May 19, 2018, 05:55:56 PM
Quote from: ace3g on May 19, 2018, 05:29:41 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjaqlICVa1w
Hope its not drenched in layers of CGI like how the animatronics were in the last movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on May 19, 2018, 06:18:34 PM
Quote from: Mr.Turok on May 19, 2018, 05:55:56 PM
Quote from: ace3g on May 19, 2018, 05:29:41 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjaqlICVa1w
Hope its not drenched in layers of CGI like how the animatronics were in the last movie.
Like those awful raptor heads...the tweets were deleted now but someone was pointing out that they were being covered in CGI for Fallen Kingdom.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: dallevalle on May 19, 2018, 08:47:29 PM
oh man this movie is gonna be so horrible :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on May 20, 2018, 07:31:28 AM
Quote from: dallevalle on May 19, 2018, 08:47:29 PM
oh man this movie is gonna be completely awesome

Fixed that for you
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on May 20, 2018, 03:18:41 PM
First I thought oh no they are cgi-ing over the animatronics but seeing them in use in the behind the scenes stuff they are not that convincing as Winstons studio were so I'm ok with that. The tv spots are really lovely... I just wonder what surprises are left now... apart from Benjamin Lockwoods character. Got my tickets ready for the 6th :-)

Another tv spot

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIk5XzPTjHg
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr.Turok on May 20, 2018, 05:32:25 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on May 20, 2018, 03:18:41 PM
First I thought oh no they are cgi-ing over the animatronics but seeing them in use in the behind the scenes stuff they are not that convincing as Winstons studio were so I'm ok with that. The tv spots are really lovely... I just wonder what surprises are left now... apart from Benjamin Lockwoods character. Got my tickets ready for the 6th :-)
I really do hope its the truth and not bait to get seats in cuz then mine will be very hurt.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on May 21, 2018, 06:43:53 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxNDtTVTlnQ
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on May 21, 2018, 10:58:58 PM
I'd love to be that T-Rex.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 24, 2018, 11:33:17 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8sZtVu9iX1Q
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on May 25, 2018, 01:19:39 PM
The gyrosphere volcano escape looks quite tense now... improved effects... spoilers though

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsv1fS1AB9s
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on May 25, 2018, 05:12:23 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzuh4pC767I
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on May 26, 2018, 02:39:46 AM
As tempting as these past pages have been for me to watch, I have held off since the second trailer. Saving everything else for Jurassic 4th viewing day!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on May 26, 2018, 06:01:30 AM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on May 26, 2018, 02:39:46 AM
As tempting as these past pages have been for me to watch, I have held off since the second trailer. Saving everything else for Jurassic 4th viewing day!
Good, because the trailers probably spoil 80% of the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on May 27, 2018, 04:29:34 AM
Quote from: Gate on May 26, 2018, 06:01:30 AM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on May 26, 2018, 02:39:46 AM
As tempting as these past pages have been for me to watch, I have held off since the second trailer. Saving everything else for Jurassic 4th viewing day!
Good, because the trailers probably spoil 80% of the film.

Oh, I think we can safely say it's up near 90% at this point. But spoilers don't bother me personally. The more I see the better. I like to know what I'm buying. Plus everytime I watch it after the first time, I'll always know what's gonna happen anyway. I guess I'm more concerned with being entertained than surprised.  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PredBabe on May 27, 2018, 04:45:16 AM
You know I didn't mind Jurassic World so much, it was fun and the final fight amongst the dinos was some entertaining fan service. But I'm having a hard time feeling any hype for this sequel despite Jeff Goldblum being featured (which I'd bet money on him only being in it for 5 minutes tops).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on May 27, 2018, 12:10:59 PM
Seeing Jeff Goldblum for five seconds will be worth admission price ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on May 27, 2018, 01:56:03 PM
The openingscene alone is worth the ticket... trust me 🤘
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr.Turok on May 27, 2018, 05:30:46 PM
Quote from: FiorinaFury161 on May 27, 2018, 12:10:59 PM
Seeing Jeff Goldblum for five seconds will be worth admission price ;)
I'll be so mad if his scene is cut, i swear to god enough with these dumbass mistakes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on May 27, 2018, 07:31:53 PM
His scene is still in, it was confirmed by Colin last week at the 25th anniversary party
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: razeak on May 28, 2018, 12:04:07 AM
I really liked the trailers so far. The dino in the bedroom scene looks extremely tense.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naginata on May 28, 2018, 01:56:54 AM
I'm excited for this movie, and like most of what I've seen thus far, but am I the only one who thinks the Indoraptor is dumb?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr.Turok on May 28, 2018, 02:24:14 AM
Quote from: Naginata on May 28, 2018, 01:56:54 AM
I'm excited for this movie, and like most of what I've seen thus far, but am I the only one who thinks the Indoraptor is dumb?
Concept wise or design wise?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naginata on May 28, 2018, 03:08:51 AM
The design is pretty boring, but even concept-wise it seems kinda dumb. The Indominus kinda-sorta made sense since the point was spectacle, but what possible military/defense purpose could an uncontrollable murder-machine with zero natural immunity to bullets serve? If it has the same abilities as the Indominus, then it's just a smaller, less visually appealing version of something we've already seen. If not, then... what? A raptor that's really smart and has thumbs? Isn't the JP Raptors' whole deal that they're smart and able to open doors?

Maybe the whole "hey kid, look at my spoooooooky Freddy Kruger hand!" bit from the trailer put me off, I dunno. I'm looking forward to Blue kicking its ass, if nothing else.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Old One on May 28, 2018, 03:12:20 AM
Everything in this series is dumb past the first entry.

I really don't understand the appeal of this series, the first was excellent but the concept isn't one that sticks around in my mind honestly. But hey, kids like the dinos! & That's my hot take.

I think I preferred the initial premise of Primeval, has more potential that Jurassic World. Without John Hammond's earnest optimism, or any sense of that naivety Jurassic Park has nothing but vapid CGI.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naginata on May 28, 2018, 03:21:34 AM
Now hold on. I'll grant you 3 and 4 were dumb as bricks, but TLW is my JAM, kung-fu gymnastics and all.  ;D

When I say "dumb" I mean "an unsatisfying idea by the standards of a silly dinosaur movie." Like, a poison-spitting dodo with bat wings would reach new plateaus of stupid, but at least it would be novel/unexpected. The Indoraptor just seems like a lame villain.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on May 28, 2018, 03:35:37 AM
If they made a dilphosaurus with bat wings, I would open my wallet right away! :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naginata on May 28, 2018, 04:00:49 AM
^ Vindication!

The JP Dilophosaur is already so inaccurate, bat wings wouldn't even be much of a stretch, LOL. Still love the buck-toothed little Newman-slayer, though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on May 28, 2018, 04:37:48 AM
Guess the dilphobat would be one his big brothers, he's not so bad. He might play fetch the stick ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on May 28, 2018, 07:36:58 PM
JP Dilophosaur was obviously merged with Pit Viper or Cobra DNA. Terrible choice for a display dino, lol.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naginata on May 28, 2018, 09:09:20 PM
In retrospect, the "we're going past a venom-spitting monstrosity, do us a solid and roll up the windows" should have been the first indication that park security was perhaps not the best.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 28, 2018, 09:28:12 PM
That and the lack of locking mechanisms on the vehicle doors.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naginata on May 28, 2018, 10:12:10 PM
And hiring a morally duplicitous jerk with money problems whom you don't pay enough. ... And running an entire theme park/zoo from a single room. ... And not having any paleontologists on-staff. ... And mixing the DNA with random animals. ... And electric jeeps...

Wow, JP really was a shitshow. I knew Malcolm was right, but man he was right.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on May 28, 2018, 10:18:23 PM
"Man I hate being right all the time." ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on May 29, 2018, 12:15:46 AM
Quote from: Naginata on May 28, 2018, 10:12:10 PM
And hiring a morally duplicitous jerk with money problems whom you don't pay enough. ... And running an entire theme park/zoo from a single room. ... And not having any paleontologists on-staff. ... And mixing the DNA with random animals. ... And electric jeeps...

Wow, JP really was a shitshow. I knew Malcolm was right, but man he was right.
We're gonna build the best park, truly it will be the greatest park in the whole world. And believe me when I say, it will be the best, because I know what I'm talking about here. No one will compete with our park.
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/40cqCp8RryY/maxresdefault.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on May 29, 2018, 12:49:22 AM
I really hate that man.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naginata on May 29, 2018, 02:45:45 AM
^ Seconded, but let's not go comparing Hammond to Trump; at least the ethical trainwreck Hammond caused gave us dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Old One on May 29, 2018, 02:51:16 AM
I can't remember the last time I saw the original JP, shame about the 4K though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on May 29, 2018, 10:06:04 AM
Funny people here acting like their previous Presidents were the salt of the earth ... one crook after the other
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr.Turok on May 29, 2018, 04:17:50 PM
Quote from: Naginata on May 28, 2018, 03:08:51 AM
The design is pretty boring, but even concept-wise it seems kinda dumb. The Indominus kinda-sorta made sense since the point was spectacle, but what possible military/defense purpose could an uncontrollable murder-machine with zero natural immunity to bullets serve? If it has the same abilities as the Indominus, then it's just a smaller, less visually appealing version of something we've already seen. If not, then... what? A raptor that's really smart and has thumbs? Isn't the JP Raptors' whole deal that they're smart and able to open doors?

Maybe the whole "hey kid, look at my spoooooooky Freddy Kruger hand!" bit from the trailer put me off, I dunno. I'm looking forward to Blue kicking its ass, if nothing else.
Its the reason why they pumped more raptor DNA on this one, to have all the abilities of the previous one but the obedience of a raptor like with Blue and Owen. Damm thing these warmongers like Hopkins don't realize is that its a long process and even then its not perfect. But warmongers just want that cash and fame. Basically they are taking the argument that Owen and Hopkins had and turning it into the plot of this new movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on May 29, 2018, 10:40:16 PM
There is more to this movie... it has a big plottwist
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 29, 2018, 11:23:39 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DeY8Nk3X4AAM4SG.jpg:large)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on May 30, 2018, 02:26:07 AM
Quote from: Xan21 on May 29, 2018, 10:06:04 AM
Funny people here acting like their previous Presidents were the salt of the earth ... one crook after the other
I guess no one got my John Hammond quote ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on May 30, 2018, 07:53:19 AM
Quote from: ace3g on May 29, 2018, 11:23:39 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DeY8Nk3X4AAM4SG.jpg:large)

Great poster but isn't the human a bit too small compaired to the Rex? And the big space between the text annoys me lol
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 30, 2018, 09:58:48 AM
Isn't Kong a little big here? ::)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg11.hostingpics.net%2Fpics%2F179654KONGdegen.jpg&hash=1e11320dee01882e4e787acc7fe3f8cf64787e91)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 01, 2018, 01:15:54 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbX3-gxvXeU

HD Poster;

(https://images2.imgbox.com/93/7f/BOpvVFZH_o.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Jun 01, 2018, 05:59:55 AM
Quote from: The Son of Paragus on May 30, 2018, 07:53:19 AM
Quote from: ace3g on May 29, 2018, 11:23:39 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DeY8Nk3X4AAM4SG.jpg:large)

Great poster but isn't the human a bit too small compaired to the Rex? And the big space between the text annoys me lol

I think that's the scene with the mosasaur from the trailer. I suspect the rex has just been pasted in there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 01, 2018, 06:02:36 AM
That is the ultimate crane game.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 01, 2018, 12:17:32 PM
The poster is correct although the size of the rex is ridiculous lol

Spoiler
The T rex and Mosasaurus are in the same scene in the opening plus a very nice although too small cameo of another beloved dino from JP. I feel it gets the shaft for the rest of the film as usual.
[close]

New tv spot... I laughed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dU4lq-BYD_4
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naginata on Jun 02, 2018, 01:31:53 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on May 29, 2018, 10:06:04 AM
Funny people here acting like their previous Presidents were the salt of the earth ... one crook after the other

It was a reference to John Hammond's line from the original Jurassic Park, dude.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 05, 2018, 03:17:21 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fscreencrush.com%2Ffiles%2F2018%2F06%2Fjurassic-world-2.jpg%3Fw%3D1300%26amp%3Bh%3D1994%26amp%3Bq%3D75&hash=98da869ee73285e95c50f820055aadb9b1aa59f9)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 05, 2018, 03:24:20 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Jun 05, 2018, 03:17:21 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fscreencrush.com%2Ffiles%2F2018%2F06%2Fjurassic-world-2.jpg%3Fw%3D1300%26amp%3Bh%3D1994%26amp%3Bq%3D75&hash=98da869ee73285e95c50f820055aadb9b1aa59f9)
I feel like a ten year old standing before a giant movie sign at the mall again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Jun 05, 2018, 03:27:08 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Jun 05, 2018, 03:17:21 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fscreencrush.com%2Ffiles%2F2018%2F06%2Fjurassic-world-2.jpg%3Fw%3D1300%26amp%3Bh%3D1994%26amp%3Bq%3D75&hash=98da869ee73285e95c50f820055aadb9b1aa59f9)

I'm getting a serious Primal Rage vibe from that poster.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Tangakkai on Jun 05, 2018, 08:31:49 PM
Woah, who would have thought we'd have 4 carnivores in 1 JW movie (not including that hybrid shit).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Jun 05, 2018, 08:36:45 PM
Critics seem to be mixed on the movie again. However most are saying it's very entertaining and Bayona put a nice spin on it. A general consensus seems to say that movie sets up a cool idea for the next movie, the dinosaurs are treated as characters, the action is great, and the humans are slightly better but still a lot of under developed and wasted characters.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 05, 2018, 10:54:31 PM
I'll note and tally how many times I cringe or roll my eyes tomorrow ;-) but I will enjoy it I hope
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Jun 05, 2018, 10:57:48 PM
Lucky you. I have to wait until the 21st to see it here in the US. Hope you enjoy it! I'm really excited.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 05, 2018, 11:11:17 PM
Quote from: Tangakkai on Jun 05, 2018, 08:31:49 PM
Woah, who would have thought we'd have 4 carnivores in 1 JW movie (not including that hybrid shit).
That poster does not include the Allosaurs or Baryonix that are set to appear too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Jun 06, 2018, 05:39:16 AM
Baryonx is there on the bottom right.

I'll be seeing this I 5 hours. Cant wait
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 06, 2018, 05:42:31 AM
Quote from: Russ840 on Jun 06, 2018, 05:39:16 AM
Baryonx is there on the bottom right.

I'll be seeing this I 5 hours. Cant wait
That's a Suchomimus.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Jun 06, 2018, 08:24:19 AM
What makes you think that ? 

Have I missed something? 

The suchomimus has not been featured in any marketing, to my knowledge, yet they stick him on the poster in spite of the fact the Baryonx has been in all the trailers.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Jun 06, 2018, 09:04:07 AM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 05, 2018, 08:36:45 PMA general consensus seems to say that movie sets up a cool idea for the next movie...

Eugh, my least favourite thing to read in a review. Films should be a stand-alone piece of entertainment, not set-up up the next one.

Incidentally, I saw the trailer before Deadpool 2 last night, and my opinion of it after seeing it on the big screen went from not really being bothered to actively thinking it looked stupid. I'm definitely out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Jun 06, 2018, 12:51:07 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 05, 2018, 10:57:48 PM
Lucky you. I have to wait until the 21st to see it here in the US. Hope you enjoy it! I'm really excited.

Yes lol ! It's payback for delaying The Predator for 1 month in France ! Just kidding of course  ;)

I'm going to see this tonight and i hope i will be entertained !
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Jun 06, 2018, 01:08:58 PM
Just saw it. Pretty good. I was never bored. Only a couple of dodgy CG shots.

I will say this. Where as I left the cinema after watching JW feeling like the kid I did originally watching JP, I left the cinema this time feeling a little like I did after watching LW.

I simple feels like such a different movie.

Spoiler
there is no Suchomimus. So that puts to rest the chat this morning about one being on that poster. As I said. Baryonx. 
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 06, 2018, 05:21:44 PM
Quote from: Russ840 on Jun 06, 2018, 08:24:19 AM
What makes you think that ? 

Have I missed something? 

The suchomimus has not been featured in any marketing, to my knowledge, yet they stick him on the poster in spite of the fact the Baryonx has been in all the trailers.
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/cc2GA59BsLc/maxresdefault.jpg)

Looks much more like a sucho here don't you think?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Jun 06, 2018, 06:22:41 PM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 06, 2018, 05:21:44 PM
Quote from: Russ840 on Jun 06, 2018, 08:24:19 AM
What makes you think that ? 

Have I missed something? 

The suchomimus has not been featured in any marketing, to my knowledge, yet they stick him on the poster in spite of the fact the Baryonx has been in all the trailers.
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/cc2GA59BsLc/maxresdefault.jpg)

Looks much more like a sucho here don't you think?

As per my last post. Saw the movie today. That which you are pointing out is an Allosaurus. It's says so in the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 06, 2018, 07:45:12 PM
I loved Fallen Kingdom from start to finish.

Couldn't have asked for a better Jurassic Park 5.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Jun 06, 2018, 07:59:35 PM
Malcom's small appearance was so in character. I was worried that he would seen different but he felt like Malcom. Don't ya think ?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 06, 2018, 08:18:19 PM
100%! He nailed the character perfectly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 06, 2018, 08:57:44 PM
I don't know what to say... it was dissapointing in many places and some very touching moments in other places... Me and my friend just sat after the credits completely baffled by how bad it was at times. Don't know what to say.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Jun 06, 2018, 08:58:04 PM
I was a little pissed and happy at the same time with the little tease of a certain animal during the opening. Lol. I was like " come on" another movie without it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Jun 06, 2018, 10:05:32 PM
Quote from: Russ840 on Jun 06, 2018, 08:58:04 PM
I was a little pissed and happy at the same time with the little tease of a certain animal during the opening. Lol. I was like " come on" another movie without it.
Spoiler
Dilophosaurus I take it?
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 06, 2018, 11:08:32 PM
Quote from: Godzillakuj94 on Jun 06, 2018, 10:05:32 PM
Quote from: Russ840 on Jun 06, 2018, 08:58:04 PM
I was a little pissed and happy at the same time with the little tease of a certain animal during the opening. Lol. I was like " come on" another movie without it.
Spoiler
Dilophosaurus I take it?
[close]
Spoiler
I want it to be the spinosaurus but I'll take a dilo over Spino any way.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Jun 06, 2018, 11:09:54 PM
Just read the full plot summary. Seems kinda hit and miss in general. That opening was just what I figured. Definitely my favorite part.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Highland on Jun 06, 2018, 11:34:18 PM
A lot of people talking this up, I think I'll catch this on the big screen. Was always a fan of the series.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 06, 2018, 11:37:04 PM
B.D. Wong, Rafe Spall and Tobey Jones... absolutely terribly written characters... I was amazed by their terrible performances.

Isabelle, James Cromwell, Danielle, Justice and Geraldine were pretty good

I liked Chris and Bryce a bit more this time around but
Spoiler
whyyy kiss againnn...after she gets hurt even
[close]
it didn't work the first time either.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Jun 07, 2018, 01:23:35 AM
I saw it on a midnight screening Tuesday night. It was good. Better than the last one in my opinion.

It did, however, kinda feel like the first two acts were The Lost World with a few 'greatest hits of Jurassic Park' scenes and shots scattered through. The third act was then just kinda crazy and awesome. Left with a grin, despite some real stupidity earlier in the movie.

The intro is also awesome, felt more like the originals books than the rest of the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jun 07, 2018, 03:10:25 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 06, 2018, 07:45:12 PM
I loved Fallen Kingdom from start to finish.

Couldn't have asked for a better Jurassic Park 5.
This s the quote I hoped to see! Thread officially on ignore until Jurassic Fourth when I can watch it!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Jun 07, 2018, 05:50:27 AM
Quote from: Godzillakuj94 on Jun 06, 2018, 10:05:32 PM
Quote from: Russ840 on Jun 06, 2018, 08:58:04 PM
I was a little pissed and happy at the same time with the little tease of a certain animal during the opening. Lol. I was like " come on" another movie without it.
Spoiler
Dilophosaurus I take it?
[close]

Spoiler
yeah. You hear it in the bushes. You don't see it.
[close]

Quote from: Gate on Jun 06, 2018, 11:08:32 PM
Quote from: Godzillakuj94 on Jun 06, 2018, 10:05:32 PM
Quote from: Russ840 on Jun 06, 2018, 08:58:04 PM
I was a little pissed and happy at the same time with the little tease of a certain animal during the opening. Lol. I was like " come on" another movie without it.
Spoiler
Dilophosaurus I take it?
[close]
Spoiler
I want it to be the spinosaurus but I'll take a dilo over Spino any way.
[close]

Spoiler
its the Dilophosaurus
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Jun 07, 2018, 12:48:57 PM
Way above the first JW visually, which was really cool ! I knew Bayona could do way better than Trevorrow in this department. Director is always crucial. Just the intro, it's better than almost the whole first JW  ;D.

Story-wise, hard to build an interesting and coherent plot based on the first JW, but i guess they did okay, nothing more.

Spoiler
The f**king indoraptor was disappointing, little presence and nothing special or really unique.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 07, 2018, 01:06:29 PM
I was amazed that with tense situations it would get the 'make it light' treatment... for instance:

Spoiler
Owen is knocked out by the tranq dart and the lava is incoming. Beside the dinosaur licking his face joke it's the way Owen tries to get away from the lava. It is just so cartoony and over the top while it could have been so tense if done right... no it appearantly needs the goofball treatment... could have been a scene in the Indiana Jones Chrystal Skull movie.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: AVP-CAPCOM on Jun 07, 2018, 06:07:17 PM
Saw the movie (Fallen Kingdom).

Been watching every Jurassic Park film since July 16th 1993 when I was just 11 years old (2 weeks prior to my 12th Birthday).

Well I will give Fallen Kingdom a generous 3/5 although I am tempted to give it a 2.5/5.

As pointed out the intro was f**king amazing!!!!!! I wished they'd carried that throughout the film but instead it was all downhill from there.

Let me say Fallen Kingdom is the AVP-Requiem of the Jurassic Park films and arguably the worst. It has bland characters, laughable script, terrible lines, "Mary Poppins" depiction of English people, dark and dusk sunlit colour scheme of Requiem. Heck Fallen kingdom even copied the "Look; no monsters" creature breaking glass scene from AVP-R.
Heck some scenes I swear were choreographed by Tommy Wiseau.

The only thing saving it was some really stand out scenes (which I won't spoil or delve into). But ultimately "the bad guys" were pantomine and the main characters had plot cryptonite whereby I wanted to walk out of the cinema with the thought "yeah yeah they aren't the BAD GUYS so they won't get killed in a split second with ruthless efficiency".
At least the "mini-Godzillas" from GODZILLA 1998 had gobstoppers to fall over on to avoid said plot armour. Instead of the "indoraptor" acting like it was drunk or high on drugs ONLY in the presence of children.

Jurassic World-Fallen Kingdom is a good-ish movie but caveat emptor.

Also....spoiler

Spoiler
You know when the Nostalgia Critic joked in his Jurassic Park 3 review that the concept of Velicraptors being intelligent enough to take over the world in a "Planet of the Raptors" was laughible due to the fact paleontologists have said they had no more intelligence, size or strength than a turkey? Well Fallen Kingdom appears to predict this JP3 scenario in future installments
[close]

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Jun 07, 2018, 06:35:04 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on Jun 07, 2018, 01:06:29 PM
I was amazed that with tense situations it would get the 'make it light' treatment... for instance:

Spoiler
Owen is knocked out by the tranq dart and the lava is incoming. Beside the dinosaur licking his face joke it's the way Owen tries to get away from the lava. It is just so cartoony and over the top while it could have been so tense if done right... no it appearantly needs the goofball treatment... could have been a scene in the Indiana Jones Chrystal Skull movie.
[close]

I do agree with this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 07, 2018, 09:52:38 PM
Just seen it again and I still feel the same...

Spoiler
the part at the auction and releasing the dinosaurs is the weakest part of this film. The bad guys getting offed was so annoying especially Mills getting killed in such a looney tunes way.

I also noticed these things were missing

The Mosaurus eye lurking into the submarine
Franklin was supposed to try and fix a lamp in the bunker and it explodes and Claire tells him to stop trying to fix things
This scene was followed by Zia, Wheatly and Owen finding a dead dinosaur before they find Blue
This is gonna be awesome line by Owen

[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 07, 2018, 10:42:45 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on Jun 07, 2018, 01:06:29 PM
I was amazed that with tense situations it would get the 'make it light' treatment... for instance:

Spoiler
Owen is knocked out by the tranq dart and the lava is incoming. Beside the dinosaur licking his face joke it's the way Owen tries to get away from the lava. It is just so cartoony and over the top while it could have been so tense if done right... no it appearantly needs the goofball treatment... could have been a scene in the Indiana Jones Chrystal Skull movie.
[close]

Thats a shame, I loved that little moment.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Old One on Jun 07, 2018, 11:37:45 PM
I think the dinosaur is run out, personally, cooked- with a apple in it's mouth.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 08, 2018, 07:39:25 PM
Might surprise a few people, myself included, but I actually really enjoyed it - far more than any other sequel to Jurassic Park.


So, nitpicks? A few.


So as you can probably tell from that last point, I was kind of primed to hate this film. I've never loved any of the Jurassic sequels, particularly World, despite the original film being a formative experience and still one of my favourites ever made.

And yet, I loved Fallen Kingdom. Made me sniffle a couple of times, made me laugh a couple of times too. It was really fun, one of the better blockbusters of the last few years for me.

So, my favourite Jurassic sequel. Easy 8/10, might stretch to a 9.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 08, 2018, 07:46:02 PM
Glad you enjoyed it man! 8)

As for one of your nitpicks...

Spoiler
The predators picking off prey which are fleeing the lava and impending eruption made sense to me. When the human characters arrive on the island Mt. Sibo is already making lots of noise, so they would have been used to it. Only when it really makes some noise does it disturb them, seen when the Tyrannosaur gives up the hunt after being hit by the shockwave from the eruption.
[close]

That was my take anyways.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 08, 2018, 08:32:33 PM
Good grief. I've gotta wait 13 days more for a release? I ain't gonna last 13 hours. I'm going to go in some forum and I'm going to get spoiled. Why us Americans gotta wait 2 weeks for this? We're being punished aren't we?  :'(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 08, 2018, 08:36:37 PM
Blame the World cup. Because of that it got moved forward for some countries.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 08, 2018, 08:47:32 PM
What's a world cup?

Oh, ok, totally forgot about that thing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: mez86 on Jun 09, 2018, 11:26:53 AM
Surprised at how much I enjoyed this film 8/10 Goldblums

Never had a Jurassic Park film fill my eyes with tears till that one scene
Spoiler
brachsaurios on the pier
[close]


One question I have regarding the girl
Spoiler
is she related to lex from jp. Just with her grandad saying she busted the original park
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 09, 2018, 12:12:59 PM
Quote from: mez86 on Jun 09, 2018, 11:26:53 AM
One question I have regarding the girl
Spoiler
is she related to lex from jp. Just with her grandad saying she busted the original park
[close]

Spoiler
No she is unrelated to Lex.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Jun 09, 2018, 12:14:54 PM
Just watched JP 3 again.  Still better than Lost World.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 09, 2018, 12:21:57 PM
You might like this then SM: https://twitter.com/i/moments/997110661179031552
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 09, 2018, 12:23:17 PM
I rather watch The Lost World than hear Tea Leoni scream and whine for 90 minutes 😂

I appreciate TLW even more after Fallen Kingdom... thanks Trevorrow...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Jun 09, 2018, 12:39:32 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 09, 2018, 12:21:57 PM
You might like this then SM: https://twitter.com/i/moments/997110661179031552

He gets it. ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 09, 2018, 01:07:51 PM
That he is me.

It's my least favourite but I cannot help but appreciate little moments or details that are killer!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Jun 09, 2018, 06:39:09 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on Jun 09, 2018, 12:23:17 PM
I rather watch The Lost World than hear Tea Leoni scream and whine for 90 minutes 😂

I still think she and Tom Cruise are the same person.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 09, 2018, 07:37:57 PM
Who do you support?

www.DinosaurProtectionGroup.com

or

www.ExtinctionNow.com
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 09, 2018, 07:44:15 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 09, 2018, 07:37:57 PM
Who do you support?

www.DinosaurProtectionGroup.com

or

www.ExtinctionNow.com
The second link feels so awkward and deliberately ran by a sweaty 12 year old.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 09, 2018, 08:27:54 PM
Quote from: Huggs on Jun 09, 2018, 06:39:09 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on Jun 09, 2018, 12:23:17 PM
I rather watch The Lost World than hear Tea Leoni scream and whine for 90 minutes 😂

I still think she and Tom Cruise are the same person.

😨😁😂😂😂
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 09, 2018, 09:05:59 PM
https://twitter.com/Extinction_Now/status/1005540098165870592
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Jun 09, 2018, 09:11:44 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Jun 09, 2018, 01:07:51 PM
That he is me.

It's my least favourite but I cannot help but appreciate little moments or details that are killer!

Then you gets it.

The San Diego King Kong stuff in Lost World really dragged it down.  JP3 was just a fun adventure and didn't take itself so seriously.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 09, 2018, 09:32:41 PM
The San Diego stuff is Oscar Material compared to what we see happening at the auction rampage... ugh
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Jun 10, 2018, 10:38:46 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on Jun 09, 2018, 09:32:41 PM
The San Diego stuff is Oscar Material compared to what we see happening at the auction rampage... ugh

A little exaggerated maybe ?  :laugh:

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 11, 2018, 12:33:33 AM
A tad ;-)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: dave1978 on Jun 11, 2018, 08:19:04 AM
Well that was awful,   in simplest terms it was just a copy of "The Lost world"   bounty hunters turn up to capture dinosaurs and sell them off.  Everything else was forgettable, especially the most important thing in a JP film,,,   the Dinosaurs.  Also think that Chris Pratt was terribly under used,  where were his typically hilarious 1 liners?

Worst JP film
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 11, 2018, 09:20:02 AM
He used them all in the barscene and that was it 😂 it was awful awfulll... and I just won tickets cause I took part in a quiz last week... giving them away to my nieces.. poor them 😅
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: dave1978 on Jun 11, 2018, 09:41:53 AM
And you just know whats coming in the next one,   Dinosaurs in space.   Mark my words,  this will happen
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Jun 11, 2018, 10:26:34 AM
Quote from: dave1978 on Jun 11, 2018, 09:41:53 AM
And you just know whats coming in the next one,   Dinosaurs in space.   Mark my words,  this will happen
You mean.... DINO CRISIS 3 THE MOVIE!?!!?!
:o :o :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: skhellter on Jun 11, 2018, 11:26:26 AM
Quote from: SM on Jun 09, 2018, 09:11:44 PM
The San Diego King Kong stuff in Lost World really dragged it down.  JP3 was just a fun adventure and didn't take itself so seriously.

Scratching my head thinking about how The Lost World took itself "seriously"...  :laugh:

San Diego rampage was the best stuff in that film.

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.drewstruzan.com%2Fillustrated%2Fdocuments%2Fimg%2Fgm0807251234445680.jpg&hash=ca338364ae289e62604f910312498e49ec148d78)


I'd have fun with JP3 if the humor and writing in that one wasnt so god awful.  :-X
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 11, 2018, 01:29:33 PM
Well Fallen Kingdom fits right in with JP3's cringy lines... and other stuff could easily be cut out to make it a bit better.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: irn on Jun 11, 2018, 10:12:28 PM
Just back from seeing Fallen Kingdom and I really enjoyed it. It was like a philosophical sequel to the original Jurassic Park in sense that it illustrates how "life will find a way" more than just more dinosaurs escaping from cages like the last three sequels. It pushes the message of how chaos stems from humans harassing the power of genetic creation.

There were some dumb scenes, and silly character actions, but overall I thought it worked well. One complaint is that there seemed to be less chemistry between Pratt and BDH's characters than there was in Jurassic World, oddly. The cinematography was a lot better than JW's but there was little use of the classic score. A lot of tasteful nods to the original. It was done right and fit with the theme.

I feel like this is the first JP sequel that actually moves the overall story forward rather than repeat it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 11, 2018, 10:23:09 PM
That's true with the san diego thing in the end it didn't stick... the overall story is completely fine wth me... I just don't like unrealistic approach taken with certain scenes and the marvel-ish way of introducing characters etc... it's a bit too comical and weird. for a Jurassic movie. The moments with Owen and young Blue were very touching and the girl did really emote... 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gazz on Jun 12, 2018, 08:07:42 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNFYnT7pYis
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 12, 2018, 08:49:06 PM
Volcano was always there... well in the book... and on a map of JW
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: skhellter on Jun 12, 2018, 09:03:15 PM
Yeah it was always in the book
BUT

The film could have set it up or explained the decision making behind setting up the park on Nublar.

Just a few lines would be sufficient.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gazz on Jun 12, 2018, 09:29:32 PM
The thing is, they could have easily explained it away as a further example of John Hammonds short-sightedness and hubris, which is entirely in character. But by not providing even a few lines of acknowledgment to the fact the park had been built in the shadow of an active volcano (something which the films have wisely ignored to my memory) they allow it to stand out. It can't help but feel like a lazy and cheap plot device.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 12, 2018, 09:44:33 PM
I'm just surprised it took this long for Jurassic Park to use a volcano. Most dinosaur movies get that in early. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 12, 2018, 09:54:22 PM
It was actually storyboarded in  late 1991 for the original JP

Do you guys think that

Spoiler
Maisie has some raptor genes and Blue some of hers? Her unlocking the door... climbing onto the roof, immediate attachment to Owen and the zooming in on her eye made me sure of it... but when the film didn't elaborate I started doubting.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 12, 2018, 10:25:19 PM
Pretty sure there's reference to geothermal power in Jurassic World.

People have been developing on active volcanoes throughout history - usually because volcanic soil is very fertile, but now because it's a renewable energy source with modest land use.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gazz on Jun 12, 2018, 10:42:12 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jun 12, 2018, 10:25:19 PM
People have been developing on active volcanoes throughout history

Few theme parks, mind you.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 12, 2018, 10:53:09 PM
Cities, towns, farms, power stations, travel networks, nature reserves.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gazz on Jun 12, 2018, 10:59:04 PM
Sure, and if anything they have provided many examples of how wrong it can go. Especially if you're building on a tiny island that can be eradicated during a single eruption.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Jun 12, 2018, 11:00:00 PM
And for the people who are upset about the fact that there has never been a volcano mentioned in these films..

Remember, Luke and Leia kissed a couple of times before we found out they were twins. Even the best of movie franchises don't have it all figured out right away  ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 12, 2018, 11:14:10 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 12, 2018, 11:00:00 PM
And for the people who are upset about the fact that there has never been a volcano mentioned in these films..

Remember, Luke and Leia kissed a couple of times before we found out they were twins. Even the best of movie franchises don't have it all figured out right away  ;)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQDvsf5lAp0
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gazz on Jun 12, 2018, 11:16:05 PM
My issue isn't that there's a volcano, despite how cliche that particular plot device is (didn't The Croods do it?), but rather how it's executed. My memory of the earlier films may betray me on this point, but it feels like the film opens with a rushed 'btw Jurassic World was built on a volcano and it erupted yesterday, don't think about it' before pushing us arse-backward into the fray. It's lazy plotting, and all in service of simply rushing us towards a premise the writers find more interesting.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Jun 12, 2018, 11:19:16 PM
Quote from: Gazz on Jun 12, 2018, 11:16:05 PM
My issue isn't that there's a volcano, despite how cliche that particular plot device is (didn't The Croods do it?), but rather how it's executed. My memory of the earlier films may betray me on this point, but it feels like the film opens with a rushed 'btw Jurassic World was built on a volcano and it erupted yesterday, don't think about it' before pushing us arse-backward into the fray. It's lazy plotting, and all in service of simply rushing us towards a premise the writers find more interesting.

In all honesty Trevorrow has not proven to be the greatest writer as of late. I haven't seen the movie yet since I'm in the USA, but based on the first movie (which I really enjoyed, but the script is weak), Book of Henry (wtf?), and the reception of this movie, it seems his writing skills are not as good as he may think they are.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 12, 2018, 11:21:10 PM
To be fair, Book of Henry was an old spec script from the 90s that Trevorrow dusted off.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Jun 12, 2018, 11:24:43 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 12, 2018, 11:21:10 PM
To be fair, Book of Henry was an old spec script from the 90s that Trevorrow dusted off.

Ah, true. My mistake. But still. Wtf.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gazz on Jun 12, 2018, 11:26:43 PM
I almost forgot about The Book of Henry. I have yet to see the film but the script was something to behold. A wild ride of a trainwreck from top to bottom.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 12, 2018, 11:29:36 PM
Yeah, if I've learned anything from doing a script podcast, it's that most of the time, if a script was shelved, it's for a reason. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Jun 12, 2018, 11:31:59 PM
Yeah, I was a big fan of Trevorrow after Safety Not Guaranteed, and I really did like Jurassic World. It was a lot of fun but I recognized the flawed script. I was looking forward to him directing Episode 9 but once Book of Henry came out and they canned him it seemed like he was dealing with a lot. Book of Henry was a bad movie, there's no way around it.

I thought JW: FK would be a lot more universally loved by critics because of the addition of JA Bayona. From what I've read in reviews it seems like it's script issues once again. The director can only do so much with a script they didn't write. JA maybe should've done more but I don't know how much control Trevorrow had, he did direct the previous film that grossed over 1.6 billion dollars so he must have had a decent amount of say.

Now he's doing the third film but at least he has a new co-writer. I hope she(Emily Carmichael) brings in some fresh material to the franchise. Based on where I think the next movie is going I think we have a good shot at getting a good movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 12, 2018, 11:35:54 PM
Honestly, we're now at a place where John Sayles' script with the raptor swat team fighting drug lords wouldn't be too much of a stretch. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 12, 2018, 11:36:47 PM
The script for Fallen Kingdom was very weak... overall plot is very nice but who wrote the (story)lines for the 3 villains especially should be fired... god awful. I miss Roland, Nedry and Ludlow... they had this natural feel... almost everyone in JW feels like a cartoon cut out. Jurassic Poppins yalllll...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Jun 12, 2018, 11:37:33 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 12, 2018, 11:35:54 PM
Honestly, we're now at a place where John Sayles' script with the raptor swat team fighting drug lords wouldn't be too much of a stretch. :laugh:

Btw, just subscribed to your podcast because I'm always interested in movies that don't get made. Did you ever read those unproduced Jurassic Park IV scripts? I remember reading plot summaries years back and they sounded f**king nuts. I truly hope they never go there. I want to see some Planet of the Apes style stuff with Dinosaurs. Just don't want them riding horses or tanks  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 12, 2018, 11:40:08 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 12, 2018, 11:37:33 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 12, 2018, 11:35:54 PM
Honestly, we're now at a place where John Sayles' script with the raptor swat team fighting drug lords wouldn't be too much of a stretch. :laugh:

Btw, just subscribed to your podcast because I'm always interested in movies that don't get made. Did you ever read those unproduced Jurassic Park IV scripts? I remember reading plot summaries years back and they sounded f**king nuts. I truly hope they never go there. I want to see some Planet of the Apes style stuff with Dinosaurs. Just don't want them riding horses or tanks  ;D

There's only the one draft that's gotten out, I'll be reading it for later this month.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Jun 12, 2018, 11:50:29 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 12, 2018, 11:40:08 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 12, 2018, 11:37:33 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 12, 2018, 11:35:54 PM
Honestly, we're now at a place where John Sayles' script with the raptor swat team fighting drug lords wouldn't be too much of a stretch. :laugh:

Btw, just subscribed to your podcast because I'm always interested in movies that don't get made. Did you ever read those unproduced Jurassic Park IV scripts? I remember reading plot summaries years back and they sounded f**king nuts. I truly hope they never go there. I want to see some Planet of the Apes style stuff with Dinosaurs. Just don't want them riding horses or tanks  ;D

There's only the one draft that's gotten out, I'll be reading it for later this month.

Can't wait  ;D

In all honesty I would prefer if we got a new director for the next film. I just don't know if Trevorrow can do much better for the franchise. Someone like Matt Reeves, Ryan Coogler, or James Wan could do something great with the franchise.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 13, 2018, 12:07:23 AM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 12, 2018, 11:50:29 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 12, 2018, 11:40:08 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 12, 2018, 11:37:33 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 12, 2018, 11:35:54 PM
Honestly, we're now at a place where John Sayles' script with the raptor swat team fighting drug lords wouldn't be too much of a stretch. :laugh:

Btw, just subscribed to your podcast because I'm always interested in movies that don't get made. Did you ever read those unproduced Jurassic Park IV scripts? I remember reading plot summaries years back and they sounded f**king nuts. I truly hope they never go there. I want to see some Planet of the Apes style stuff with Dinosaurs. Just don't want them riding horses or tanks  ;D

There's only the one draft that's gotten out, I'll be reading it for later this month.

Can't wait  ;D

In all honesty I would prefer if we got a new director for the next film. I just don't know if Trevorrow can do much better for the franchise. Someone like Matt Reeves, Ryan Coogler, or James Wan could do something great with the franchise.

I have another episode currently in editing now, too. ;D

Matt Reeves would be a good pick... if he ever escapes from Bat Country.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Jun 13, 2018, 01:00:11 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 13, 2018, 12:07:23 AM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 12, 2018, 11:50:29 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 12, 2018, 11:40:08 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 12, 2018, 11:37:33 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 12, 2018, 11:35:54 PM
Honestly, we're now at a place where John Sayles' script with the raptor swat team fighting drug lords wouldn't be too much of a stretch. :laugh:

Btw, just subscribed to your podcast because I'm always interested in movies that don't get made. Did you ever read those unproduced Jurassic Park IV scripts? I remember reading plot summaries years back and they sounded f**king nuts. I truly hope they never go there. I want to see some Planet of the Apes style stuff with Dinosaurs. Just don't want them riding horses or tanks  ;D

There's only the one draft that's gotten out, I'll be reading it for later this month.

Can't wait  ;D

In all honesty I would prefer if we got a new director for the next film. I just don't know if Trevorrow can do much better for the franchise. Someone like Matt Reeves, Ryan Coogler, or James Wan could do something great with the franchise.

I have another episode currently in editing now, too. ;D

Matt Reeves would be a good pick... if he ever escapes from Bat Country.

I'm currently listening to Episode 1. Real awesome stuff. I should get a mic and we can chat about something one of these days  ;)

Yeah, that's a whole other thing haha. Reeves would do something special though. Might be too similar to what he just did with his Apes movies though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 13, 2018, 01:13:30 AM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 13, 2018, 01:00:11 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 13, 2018, 12:07:23 AM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 12, 2018, 11:50:29 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 12, 2018, 11:40:08 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 12, 2018, 11:37:33 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 12, 2018, 11:35:54 PM
Honestly, we're now at a place where John Sayles' script with the raptor swat team fighting drug lords wouldn't be too much of a stretch. :laugh:

Btw, just subscribed to your podcast because I'm always interested in movies that don't get made. Did you ever read those unproduced Jurassic Park IV scripts? I remember reading plot summaries years back and they sounded f**king nuts. I truly hope they never go there. I want to see some Planet of the Apes style stuff with Dinosaurs. Just don't want them riding horses or tanks  ;D

There's only the one draft that's gotten out, I'll be reading it for later this month.

Can't wait  ;D

In all honesty I would prefer if we got a new director for the next film. I just don't know if Trevorrow can do much better for the franchise. Someone like Matt Reeves, Ryan Coogler, or James Wan could do something great with the franchise.

I have another episode currently in editing now, too. ;D

Matt Reeves would be a good pick... if he ever escapes from Bat Country.

I'm currently listening to Episode 1. Real awesome stuff. I should get a mic and we can chat about something one of these days  ;)

Yeah, that's a whole other thing haha. Reeves would do something special though. Might be too similar to what he just did with his Apes movies though.

Cool, I'll PM you my podcast script list just in case.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 13, 2018, 01:44:13 AM
Quote from: Gazz on Jun 12, 2018, 11:16:05 PM
My issue isn't that there's a volcano, despite how cliche that particular plot device is (didn't The Croods do it?), but rather how it's executed. My memory of the earlier films may betray me on this point, but it feels like the film opens with a rushed 'btw Jurassic World was built on a volcano and it erupted yesterday, don't think about it' before pushing us arse-backward into the fray. It's lazy plotting, and all in service of simply rushing us towards a premise the writers find more interesting.

Jurassic Park was built off of geothermal power to begin with. They didn't elaborate much on this in the films, but the Telltale game explored what would have happened if it had had a meltdown, if I recall correctly.  Basically, Mount Saibo's always been there, just never touched by the story.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Jun 13, 2018, 06:37:05 AM
The book also goes into some detail about the volcanic nature of the island.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 13, 2018, 02:35:07 PM
Spoiler
(https://i2.wp.com/caps.pictures/199/3-jurassic-park/full/jurassic-park-movie-screencaps.com-4772.jpg)
[close]


You can see the peak of the volcano in the original film. On the 3D map in the Background.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Jun 13, 2018, 06:56:23 PM
It's a shame they wasted Bayona on such a bad script.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: reecebomb on Jun 13, 2018, 09:45:03 PM
Shame indeed, totally wasted, it was depressingly stupid shite of a film. If that plot was in one of the lesser Duck Tales episodes, I'd have no problems with it. This is supposed to be a cinema, not a filler episode of a Saturday-morning cartoon (nice vfx though).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 14, 2018, 12:14:27 AM
Quote from: reecebomb on Jun 13, 2018, 09:45:03 PM
Shame indeed, totally wasted, it was depressingly stupid shite of a film. If that plot was in one of the lesser Duck Tales episodes, I'd have no problems with it. This is supposed to be a cinema, not a filler episode of a Saturday-morning cartoon (nice vfx though).

I feel like I need to take a shower after reading this buzzfeed comment
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 14, 2018, 12:18:25 AM
We could always be more civil in our criticism. Like so:

"Mr. Bayona. After a long period of consideration, I have decided not to endorse your film."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: reecebomb on Jun 14, 2018, 07:03:27 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 14, 2018, 12:14:27 AM
Quote from: reecebomb on Jun 13, 2018, 09:45:03 PM
Shame indeed, totally wasted, it was depressingly stupid shite of a film. If that plot was in one of the lesser Duck Tales episodes, I'd have no problems with it. This is supposed to be a cinema, not a filler episode of a Saturday-morning cartoon (nice vfx though).

I feel like I need to take a shower after reading this buzzfeed comment

I felt I needed to take a shower after seeing that film. I guess Bayona is not the one to blame here, he did what he could with what he was given. It's at least better directed than JW1 and has some cool moments visually, especially in the first third.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gazz on Jun 14, 2018, 09:19:57 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 13, 2018, 01:44:13 AM
Quote from: Gazz on Jun 12, 2018, 11:16:05 PM
My issue isn't that there's a volcano, despite how cliche that particular plot device is (didn't The Croods do it?), but rather how it's executed. My memory of the earlier films may betray me on this point, but it feels like the film opens with a rushed 'btw Jurassic World was built on a volcano and it erupted yesterday, don't think about it' before pushing us arse-backward into the fray. It's lazy plotting, and all in service of simply rushing us towards a premise the writers find more interesting.

Jurassic Park was built off of geothermal power to begin with. They didn't elaborate much on this in the films, but the Telltale game explored what would have happened if it had had a meltdown, if I recall correctly.  Basically, Mount Saibo's always been there, just never touched by the story.

If it's not in the films (which it largely is not beyond what appears to be some minor dressing) the writers could have established it in a way that didn't make it's sudden inclusion feel like lazy plotting and utterly cliche. That it's something drawn from the book and games actually leaves the writers with little excuse. But anyway, it's such a minor point of contention when considering what other issues I had with the rest of the film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 14, 2018, 09:55:30 AM
The last third really drags it down while it has a great beautiful setpiece... it' just the cliche villain characters, a very unneeded kiss scene and some repetitive action that really drags it down. The last few shots were pretry great again with Malcolms voice over.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Son of Paragus on Jun 14, 2018, 11:38:38 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bdTQ2Tgw4g

Where are these first 5 seconds from? It's a "found footage" camera from the TLW scene where the Bull Rex takes on the bus in San Diego, never seen it before!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 14, 2018, 03:36:38 PM
From the Extinction Now! viral campaign that has been released between the international and US release of the film.

https://twitter.com/extinction_now?lang=en
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 19, 2018, 02:13:32 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21SeKAFF-ek&feature=share

OOOOOHHHHHHH!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 19, 2018, 05:34:07 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbloody-disgusting.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2018%2F06%2Fpark.gif&hash=5081fa5b7c45d997a59f3797a31e64a22a4c17b2)

(https://i2.wp.com/bloody-disgusting.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/gif1.gif)

(https://i2.wp.com/bloody-disgusting.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/gif2.gif)

(https://i2.wp.com/bloody-disgusting.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/gif3.gif)

(https://i1.wp.com/bloody-disgusting.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/gif4.gif)

(https://i2.wp.com/bloody-disgusting.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/gif45.gif)

(https://i0.wp.com/bloody-disgusting.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/gif5.gif)




Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: newbeing on Jun 20, 2018, 04:48:24 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSvLekthpic

I almost want to see it just to know what crazy shit they're talking about at the end.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2018, 10:47:03 PM
My podcast episode (https://soundcloud.com/kiramidhead/jurassic-park-4-final) on the discarded JP4 script.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Jun 21, 2018, 10:51:03 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2018, 10:47:03 PM
My podcast episode (https://soundcloud.com/kiramidhead/jurassic-park-4-final) on the discarded JP4 script.

Just about to listen.

That script was bonkers. Really glad they didn't make that movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2018, 10:52:35 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 21, 2018, 10:51:03 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2018, 10:47:03 PM
My podcast episode (https://soundcloud.com/kiramidhead/jurassic-park-4-final) on the discarded JP4 script.

Just about to listen.

That script was bonkers. Really glad they didn't make that movie.

Honestly, I think it wasn't bonkers enough. If it went totally insane and had gun wielding dinos like everyone thinks it does, it would have been too ridiculous to hate.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Jun 21, 2018, 10:56:02 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2018, 10:52:35 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 21, 2018, 10:51:03 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2018, 10:47:03 PM
My podcast episode (https://soundcloud.com/kiramidhead/jurassic-park-4-final) on the discarded JP4 script.

Just about to listen.

That script was bonkers. Really glad they didn't make that movie.

Honestly, I think it wasn't bonkers enough. If it went totally insane and had gun wielding dinos like everyone thinks it does, it would have been too ridiculous to hate.

It didn't feel like a Jurassic Park movie though. I kind of like the attack on the mainland, though I wish there were some actual casualties. I also enjoy once Nick is on the island and gets the DNA but once he gets to that castle it's definitely not a Jurassic Park movie anymore.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2018, 11:00:09 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 21, 2018, 10:56:02 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2018, 10:52:35 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 21, 2018, 10:51:03 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2018, 10:47:03 PM
My podcast episode (https://soundcloud.com/kiramidhead/jurassic-park-4-final) on the discarded JP4 script.

Just about to listen.

That script was bonkers. Really glad they didn't make that movie.

Honestly, I think it wasn't bonkers enough. If it went totally insane and had gun wielding dinos like everyone thinks it does, it would have been too ridiculous to hate.

It didn't feel like a Jurassic Park movie though. I kind of like the attack on the mainland, though I wish there were some actual casualties. I also enjoy once Nick is on the island and gets the DNA but once he gets to that castle it's definitely not a Jurassic Park movie anymore.

I hate everything to do with that f**king Barbasol can in the script. Not would the embryos be toast, but it keeps coming up for basically no reason. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Jun 21, 2018, 11:02:59 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2018, 11:00:09 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 21, 2018, 10:56:02 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2018, 10:52:35 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 21, 2018, 10:51:03 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2018, 10:47:03 PM
My podcast episode (https://soundcloud.com/kiramidhead/jurassic-park-4-final) on the discarded JP4 script.

Just about to listen.

That script was bonkers. Really glad they didn't make that movie.

Honestly, I think it wasn't bonkers enough. If it went totally insane and had gun wielding dinos like everyone thinks it does, it would have been too ridiculous to hate.

It didn't feel like a Jurassic Park movie though. I kind of like the attack on the mainland, though I wish there were some actual casualties. I also enjoy once Nick is on the island and gets the DNA but once he gets to that castle it's definitely not a Jurassic Park movie anymore.

I hate everything to do with that f**king Barbasol can in the script. Not would the embryos be toast, but it keeps coming up for basically no reason. :laugh:

Fair enough, but yes, the villains bring it up constantly. The ending of the movie is out of a early 90's comedy too. That was laughable lol.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2018, 11:05:56 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 21, 2018, 11:02:59 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2018, 11:00:09 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 21, 2018, 10:56:02 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2018, 10:52:35 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 21, 2018, 10:51:03 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2018, 10:47:03 PM
My podcast episode (https://soundcloud.com/kiramidhead/jurassic-park-4-final) on the discarded JP4 script.

Just about to listen.

That script was bonkers. Really glad they didn't make that movie.

Honestly, I think it wasn't bonkers enough. If it went totally insane and had gun wielding dinos like everyone thinks it does, it would have been too ridiculous to hate.

It didn't feel like a Jurassic Park movie though. I kind of like the attack on the mainland, though I wish there were some actual casualties. I also enjoy once Nick is on the island and gets the DNA but once he gets to that castle it's definitely not a Jurassic Park movie anymore.

I hate everything to do with that f**king Barbasol can in the script. Not would the embryos be toast, but it keeps coming up for basically no reason. :laugh:

Fair enough, but yes, the villains bring it up constantly. The ending of the movie is out of a early 90's comedy too. That was laughable lol.

Sherman and the pterosaurs? Yeah, that was shit. :laugh: Everything wraps up very, very quickly. The climax is basically five pages long, and is just a bunch of cars turning over.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Jun 21, 2018, 11:08:04 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2018, 11:05:56 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 21, 2018, 11:02:59 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2018, 11:00:09 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 21, 2018, 10:56:02 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2018, 10:52:35 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 21, 2018, 10:51:03 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2018, 10:47:03 PM
My podcast episode (https://soundcloud.com/kiramidhead/jurassic-park-4-final) on the discarded JP4 script.

Just about to listen.

That script was bonkers. Really glad they didn't make that movie.

Honestly, I think it wasn't bonkers enough. If it went totally insane and had gun wielding dinos like everyone thinks it does, it would have been too ridiculous to hate.

It didn't feel like a Jurassic Park movie though. I kind of like the attack on the mainland, though I wish there were some actual casualties. I also enjoy once Nick is on the island and gets the DNA but once he gets to that castle it's definitely not a Jurassic Park movie anymore.

I hate everything to do with that f**king Barbasol can in the script. Not would the embryos be toast, but it keeps coming up for basically no reason. :laugh:

Fair enough, but yes, the villains bring it up constantly. The ending of the movie is out of a early 90's comedy too. That was laughable lol.

Sherman and the pterosaurs? Yeah, that was shit. :laugh: Everything wraps up very, very quickly. The climax is basically five pages long, and is just a bunch of cars turning over.

I love the constant in your face reminder of the armored ankylosaurus throughout the script. I was waiting for a little fairy to pop out and say "HEY GUYS, THIS IS A SET UP FOR A LATER SCENE"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2018, 11:10:42 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 21, 2018, 11:08:04 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2018, 11:05:56 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 21, 2018, 11:02:59 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2018, 11:00:09 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 21, 2018, 10:56:02 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2018, 10:52:35 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 21, 2018, 10:51:03 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2018, 10:47:03 PM
My podcast episode (https://soundcloud.com/kiramidhead/jurassic-park-4-final) on the discarded JP4 script.

Just about to listen.

That script was bonkers. Really glad they didn't make that movie.

Honestly, I think it wasn't bonkers enough. If it went totally insane and had gun wielding dinos like everyone thinks it does, it would have been too ridiculous to hate.

It didn't feel like a Jurassic Park movie though. I kind of like the attack on the mainland, though I wish there were some actual casualties. I also enjoy once Nick is on the island and gets the DNA but once he gets to that castle it's definitely not a Jurassic Park movie anymore.

I hate everything to do with that f**king Barbasol can in the script. Not would the embryos be toast, but it keeps coming up for basically no reason. :laugh:

Fair enough, but yes, the villains bring it up constantly. The ending of the movie is out of a early 90's comedy too. That was laughable lol.

Sherman and the pterosaurs? Yeah, that was shit. :laugh: Everything wraps up very, very quickly. The climax is basically five pages long, and is just a bunch of cars turning over.

I love the constant in your face reminder of the armored ankylosaurus throughout the script. I was waiting for a little fairy to pop out and say "HEY GUYS, THIS IS A SET UP FOR A LATER SCENE"

And even then he feels like an after thought. They don't even mention that he's being parachuted in for the attack on the compound. He just kind of shows up, knocks down a door, and then f**ks off. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 21, 2018, 11:34:18 PM
30 minutes cut from Jurassic world Fallen Kingdom deemed not important to be put on the bluray says Bayona... like the movie itself isnt dissapointing enough... now I actually don't have to buy it at all. Glad it all wraps up in 2021...

https://jurassicoutpost.com/jurassic-world-fallen-kingdom-almost-featured-dilophoaurus-but-dont-expect-the-deleted-scenes-to-be-released/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Jun 21, 2018, 11:36:10 PM
Seeing this tonight. I'm hopeful.

Just wish they'd remove Trevorrow from this mix. However from what I've heard on how the movie is ending.. Trevorrow will have free reign to give us a completely different movie in the third one. So he'll have to get creative. Thankfully he has another screenwriter partnering up with him.

His directing isn't the issue in my opinion, he's just not a good writer.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 21, 2018, 11:37:47 PM
Speaking of Trevorrow, remember how I was cutting him slack on Book of Henry since he dusted off a spec script? Well, I dug a little deeper, and it turned out the script was written as a black comedy, and Trevorrow decided to play it seriously instead. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 22, 2018, 10:35:58 AM
I loved this movie. It's full of stupid but man on man. Although I can see why it's not getting the greatest of ratings.

Spoiler
They went dark. For a PG-13 flick this movie is full of death, terror and the evil of man. The Fallen Kingdom is Man. I know it won't happen but if they go ahead and have Isla Nublar explode, man is going to be sent back to the dark ages. Billions dead and then there's nothing to stop the genetic dinosaur apocalypse from taking over. There is so much R-rated horror and the folly of man potential.
[close]

So much that they're going to need time travel to fix it all.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Highland on Jun 22, 2018, 11:52:52 AM
Seeing this tomorrow with the wifey, very mixed reviews.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2018, 02:24:10 PM
The only review that matters is your own.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 22, 2018, 03:00:26 PM
And mine! :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: 426Buddy on Jun 22, 2018, 04:11:26 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jun 22, 2018, 10:35:58 AM
I loved this movie. It's full of stupid but man on man. Although I can see why it's not getting the greatest of ratings.

:laugh: :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Jun 22, 2018, 04:33:15 PM
I saw this movie last night, wow, I had a great time with it. It's got some intense scenes. The opening few minutes and a scene later on in the 3rd act in particular were very tense and at times a bit scary. I jumped once during the film towards the end. The effects are great and the action is stellar. My only gripe with most of these films is the body count usually, I want more carnage. I think out of all of the movies JW might have the most deaths in all of the films but this movie definitely had a few moments where it got more violent than any previous movie. A certain scene inside of a cage comes to mind.

The Indoraptor was a freaking psychopath. I really liked that creature, it seemed like pure evil. At one point the damn thing gave an evil grin. I really enjoyed the "good" guys. Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard were great, although I wish they had done something a bit better with their relationship history. The new characters Franklin and Zia were a good time, and I thought the little girl who portrayed Maisie was very impressive. Bayona does a great job of making you care about the creatures. There's a tear-jerking scene towards the end of the first act with a dinosaur on a pier that was devastating. The end of the movie excites me as well. I think the next movie has a shot at being something completely different than what we've seen before.

Unfortunately the villains are cartoonish similar to the first Jurassic World. BD Wong is a Bond villain in a bad Bond movie. They've yet to explain why his character made this turn and in this movie he's barely in it and when he is the delivery of his lines are laughable. Toby Jones is ridiculous. Rafe Spall started out decent but once the second half of the movie begins he becomes an over the top character as well. Most of the villains get rather satisfying conclusions to their arc towards the end of the movie though.

I was happy they went with more animatronics in this movie, versus JW which only used them in two scenes if I remember correctly. I was pretty happy with the film I got. I think the movie's biggest enemy is the script, the dialogue is pretty bad at some points but the actors do the best with that they're given and it's the lead charisma that elevates the material. They did something different with the second half and I really dug it. I truly hope Trevorrow's writing in the next movie is dealt with by his new writing partner and he can focus more on the directing. (Honestly, I hope they replace him as a director)

Overall I'd give this movie an 8/10.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 22, 2018, 04:51:08 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 22, 2018, 04:33:15 PM
I saw this movie last night, wow, I had a great time with it. It's got some intense scenes. The opening few minutes and a scene later on in the 3rd act in particular were very tense and at times a bit scary. I jumped once during the film towards the end. The effects are great and the action is stellar. My only gripe with most of these films is the body count usually, I want more carnage. I think out of all of the movies JW might have the most deaths in all of the films but this movie definitely had a few moments where it got more violent than any previous movie. A certain scene inside of a cage comes to mind.

The Indoraptor was a freaking psychopath. I really liked that creature, it seemed like pure evil. At one point the damn thing gave an evil grin. I really enjoyed the "good" guys. Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard were great, although I wish they had done something a bit better with their relationship history. The new characters Franklin and Zia were a good time, and I thought the little girl who portrayed Maisie was very impressive. Bayona does a great job of making you care about the creatures. There's a tear-jerking scene towards the end of the first act with a dinosaur on a pier that was devastating. The end of the movie excites me as well. I think the next movie has a shot at being something completely different than what we've seen before.

Unfortunately the villains are cartoonish similar to the first Jurassic World. BD Wong is a Bond villain in a bad Bond movie. They've yet to explain why his character made this turn and in this movie he's barely in it and when he is the delivery of his lines are laughable. Toby Jones is ridiculous. Rafe Spall started out decent but once the second half of the movie begins he becomes an over the top character as well. Most of the villains get rather satisfying conclusions to their arc towards the end of the movie though.

I was happy they went with more animatronics in this movie, versus JW which only used them in two scenes if I remember correctly. I was pretty happy with the film I got. I think the movie's biggest enemy is the script, the dialogue is pretty bad at some points but the actors do the best with that they're given and it's the lead charisma that elevates the material. They did something different with the second half and I really dug it. I truly hope Trevorrow's writing in the next movie is dealt with by his new writing partner and he can focus more on the directing. (Honestly, I hope they replace him as a director)

Overall I'd give this movie an 8/10.
Damn, Im f**king sold on seeing it tonight!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2018, 06:21:17 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 22, 2018, 04:33:15 PM
I saw this movie last night, wow, I had a great time with it.
Overall I'd give this movie an 8/10.

Glad you liked it dude!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 22, 2018, 06:52:03 PM
Quote from: 426Buddy on Jun 22, 2018, 04:11:26 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jun 22, 2018, 10:35:58 AM
I loved this movie. It's full of stupid but man on man. Although I can see why it's not getting the greatest of ratings.

:laugh: :laugh:
Oh snap but there is some assumed man on man pillow action in this movie. Oh man that joke is in poor taste but I'm shocked that they even suggested it. Like MudButt said the villains are really over the top. Still this is a dinosaur movie and I think the dialog and reasons are cheesy and ambiguous because of that. However they are evil, definitely bond villain grade and not just from the bad bond movies. A lot of movie goes unsaid but any adult can easily figure out the message being made. Although why the villains do what they do seems obvious.

It's hard to believe but the effects keep getting better and I think that is because of the use of not only cgi but practical effects as well. I know they're people who still claim the dinos from Jurassic Park look better but that's loony talk. This movie is beautiful.

The one downside though, the movie is harsh and unforgiving. It has very dark themes and the one thing I noticed is that no one clapped at the end. Not because the movie is boring or gross I suppose but because it really does deal with some heavy shit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 22, 2018, 07:10:58 PM
I just got back from seeing it, and had a goddamn blast. It's a huge budget B movie with dinosaurs tearing shit up, and Blue jumping out in front of an explosion like Bruce f**king Willis. It's almost more of a spiritual successor to Carnosaur than JP, but it's so much fun I didn't care.

I could sum up my relatively small issues fairly briefly:

Spoiler
-The Nublar scenes in the first act felt more than a little rushed. I would have liked to spend more time there.

-I'm really not sold on an interspecies blood transfusion working at all.

-The subplot with Maisie was really, really weird. The clone bomb got dropped so close to the end it really didn't hit as hard as it should have. It also raises a number of questions. If Hammond and Lockwood fell out over Maisie before Jurassic Park even opened, why is she still only roughly 12 over twice that amount of time later?

-Wu didn't exactly exit the film with much dignity, did he? :laugh:

-Pratt still has more chemistry with a CGI Velociraptor than he does with Howard. :laugh:
[close]

Also, why isn't Pratt playing Nathan Drake yesterday? He already has the sarcastic charm and action star cred, but he also spends part of the finale of this movie clinging to ledges by his fingernails, and even hides behind a chest high platform at one point. The dude is literally perfect for the part.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 22, 2018, 07:37:35 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 22, 2018, 07:10:58 PM
I could sum up my relatively small issues fairly briefly:

Spoiler
-The Nublar scenes in the first act felt more than a little rushed. I would have liked to spend more time there.

-I'm really not sold on an interspecies blood transfusion working at all.

-The subplot with Maisie was really, really weird. The clone bomb got dropped so close to the end it really didn't hit as hard as it should have. It also raises a number of questions. If Hammond and Lockwood fell out over Maisie before Jurassic Park even opened, why is she still only roughly 12 over twice that amount of time later?

-Wu didn't exactly exit the film with much dignity, did he? :laugh:

-Pratt still has more chemistry with a CGI Velociraptor than he does with Howard. :laugh:
[close]

Of all the nit-picking you didn't even mention that in this movie Pratt dries off faster than Micheal Cain ever did in Jaws the Revenge. Actually while he was in the water I don't think he got wet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 22, 2018, 07:48:35 PM
Eh, that's a little too nitpicky for me. Like the high heels in JW, which I thought got wayyyyyyy too much focus from haters.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 22, 2018, 07:57:17 PM
Actually you know how the next movie should end. Having Ian Malcolm frozen in amber. That way the dinos who inherit the Earth from man can then clone man. You see where this is going...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 22, 2018, 07:58:29 PM
I want Wu to inject himself with T. rex genes and turn into that goofy were-dinosaur guy from Resident Evil 6.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Jun 22, 2018, 08:00:48 PM
Honestly, the way they keep portraying his character.. I won't be surprised if he ends up becoming some sort of giant man-dino hybrid. He's becoming that cartoonish.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 22, 2018, 08:03:35 PM
Between Wu, Milburn, and Dobby, the villains were ridiculous. In a fun way.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 22, 2018, 08:07:45 PM
Trust me there is a lot of more cringy stuff in there than that nit picky stuff... I actually liked Claire and Owen more in this especially when they just arrived on the island the music sting is very good when they look at eachother in the vehicle.

They deleted a lot of stuff on the island... it would have given it a bit more weight and the first hour definaty was my favorite part while I thought the second part would be. There was more of the bunker and Zia Owen and Wheatly encountering a dying dinosaur before Owen goes to Blue.

I absolutely disliked:

Spoiler
Mills overly evilness... I kinda liked him up until the part Eversol comes to visit him... then he was just too much...

The way Owen moves when the lava comes... if you cut out that butt up movement it's already a lot less cringy

Dr Wu being overly evil too... it's too cartoony... if the director had handled that scene where Franklin tranqs him a bit more serious I would have been fine with it

Maisie was adorable but I was also wondering... how old is she... was there a hint maybe that the clones grow slower in adulthood?

The kiss... why... why do you have to pursuade a guy to rescue a young girl with a kiss.... I'm so gonna cut that

How many times does Owen do his rollover or slide in this film... he really is an action hero now...

The approach with the dinosaur action is a bit annoyin at times... when the Stygimoloch runs into people we see it from afar and people flying in the air way too soon after eachother... Blue jumps off the Indoraptor to roar in front of us like another actionhero.... Rexy once again comes from nowhere to kill a villain... the way this was handled was worlds apart from the make a wish moment with the two rexes eating Eddie in TLW

The countless callbacks to the previous films.... was a little mweh but not a major gripe

The auction people were so ugh... 24 millionSSSS ... come on
[close]


Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 22, 2018, 08:47:53 PM
Hey that's Star Lord you're dishing. You don't dish his butt harmony. :P

Also, does anyone think Maisie...
Spoiler
could have dinosaur dna in her? I mean I know it's out of right field but much like the dinos and frog dna perhaps they spliced something into her dna as well.
[close]

Also I don't get the problem with comical villains in a pg-13 movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 22, 2018, 08:56:46 PM
Dobby was the least bad of the villains... and parts of Wheatlys character were pretty amusing... it was WU an Mills that really didn't want an Oscar. JP had a fantastic natural cast... so I expected a bit better...

Spoiler
Of course she has... and Blue has parts of her ;-)... I think... when she opened her door with the coathanger I said: they can open doorsss.
In the behind the scenes when she scares Geraldine Chaplins character she is wearing a raptor tail... but they cut it in the movie... it's only evident for 2 frames or so
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Jun 22, 2018, 09:11:27 PM
http://observer.com/2018/06/jurassic-world-fallen-kingdom-movie-review-please-just-stop/ (http://observer.com/2018/06/jurassic-world-fallen-kingdom-movie-review-please-just-stop/)

I'm not sure this guy actually watched the movie...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 22, 2018, 09:26:01 PM
Quote from: Stitch on Jun 22, 2018, 09:11:27 PM
http://observer.com/2018/06/jurassic-world-fallen-kingdom-movie-review-please-just-stop/ (http://observer.com/2018/06/jurassic-world-fallen-kingdom-movie-review-please-just-stop/)

I'm not sure this guy actually watched the movie...
I noticed that about a lot of the reviews. I admit I never heard of the director J.A. Bayona before but a lot of these critics seem to have it out for him.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Jun 22, 2018, 09:31:25 PM
I haven't read many reviews where anyone had anything against JA Bayona. Most critics are fans of his previous films. I really enjoy his previous efforts. The Impossible is a fantastic movie.

That particular review felt like he knew he wasn't going to like it going into it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 22, 2018, 09:32:12 PM
Rex Reed has always been an ass. He also starred in Myra Breckenridge, known as one of the worst movies of all time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 22, 2018, 09:41:33 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jun 22, 2018, 09:26:01 PM
Quote from: Stitch on Jun 22, 2018, 09:11:27 PM
http://observer.com/2018/06/jurassic-world-fallen-kingdom-movie-review-please-just-stop/ (http://observer.com/2018/06/jurassic-world-fallen-kingdom-movie-review-please-just-stop/)

I'm not sure this guy actually watched the movie...
I noticed that about a lot of the reviews. I admit I never heard of the director J.A. Bayona before but a lot of these critics seem to have it out for him.

I think a lot of people kind of wrote the film off beforehand - I know I did. Thankfully I made the trip anyway and it turned out to be a very pleasant surprise, so hopefully that'll be a trend too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 22, 2018, 09:50:39 PM
I think people actually thought it would be great because of Bayona.. but Colin Trevorrows hands are all over this obviously.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2018, 10:03:41 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 22, 2018, 07:10:58 PM
Spoiler
-The subplot with Maisie was really, really weird. The clone bomb got dropped so close to the end it really didn't hit as hard as it should have. It also raises a number of questions. If Hammond and Lockwood fell out over Maisie before Jurassic Park even opened, why is she still only roughly 12 over twice that amount of time later?
[close]


Spoiler
Hammond and Lockwood parted ways after Lockwood suggested the idea. Not that she was cloned decades ago.
[close]

Also...

Spoiler
https://twitter.com/JhnReed/status/1010228133507846145
[close]

Hope that clears it up. ;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 22, 2018, 10:26:30 PM
Ah, I wouldn't have thought of the latter.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 22, 2018, 10:37:34 PM
Absolutely blown away by the sequences in this film. I left the theater with tears, not even going to lie. I didn't feel the cringiness that other people felt, but perhaps it's coming from someone who likes writing characters--Zia and the nerdy guy were fun and hilarious, and neither were wasted. I can't compare it to The Lost World because they're two different films, but god if this isn't my new favorite next to the first one, then I'm crazy.

But let's get on the the meat and potatoes
Spoiler
That Brachiosaur scene on the dock was f**ked up. Nothing else to say, but it was hard to watch. Same for Blue getting shot.

I don't know how many people got this sudden dread upon seeing that final shot of Nublar destroyed by Saibo. That's the last time we're going to see Nublar, and that hit me hard in the middle of the movie. f**k, that was a tough sell.

And finally, you know where I'm going with this. I ugly sobbed over Claire's moment of truth with the red button. The gravity behind the decision, going into everything Malcolm has ever said, combined with that god damn musical cue. God, I couldn't help it. Literal goosbumps and a chill when I heard the first twenty seconds of this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8zlUUrFK-M
[close]

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 22, 2018, 10:52:22 PM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F38.media.tumblr.com%2Ff8e41945ef024e84fccdd04c5af7289d%2Ftumblr_mo25ik2CkB1qzvju0o2_250.gif&hash=fc46e6a6013742704ddded5d6b711b59402b3b11)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Jun 22, 2018, 11:41:49 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jun 22, 2018, 09:31:25 PMThat particular review felt like he knew he wasn't going to like it going into it.
It does sound that way, but it's not just that. He's getting facts about the film wrong. It's not the most complicated movie in the world, but he's getting basic character and plot points wrong. How you can review a movie when you clearly weren't paying attention is beyond me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 23, 2018, 12:52:23 AM
I have to mention, I had no idea Ted Levine was in this before I saw it. It was a pleasant surprise having him as one of the bad guys. And Peter Jason as the senator wasn't too shabby either.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 23, 2018, 02:43:36 AM
This movie was awesome but it's dark tone probably left a lot of people in the dumps. I mean the ending is outright depressive.
Spoiler
It's pretty much a complete loss for the good guys.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Jun 23, 2018, 07:52:17 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jun 23, 2018, 02:43:36 AM
This movie was awesome but it's dark tone probably left a lot of people in the dumps. I mean the ending is outright depressive.
Spoiler
It's pretty much a complete loss for the good guys.
[close]
Spoiler
it's only a mansion full of dinosaurs, realistically the army could do the job. Unless the smaller ones find a way to reproduce on the mainland.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 23, 2018, 08:10:53 AM
Quote from: Godzillakuj94 on Jun 23, 2018, 07:52:17 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jun 23, 2018, 02:43:36 AM
This movie was awesome but it's dark tone probably left a lot of people in the dumps. I mean the ending is outright depressive.
Spoiler
It's pretty much a complete loss for the good guys.
[close]
Spoiler
it's only a mansion full of dinosaurs, realistically the army could do the job. Unless the smaller ones find a way to reproduce on the mainland.
[close]
Yea but that is why it is so damn depressing.

Spoiler
And a complete loss. They wanted to save the dinos but they're all doomed. It would have been more merciful to let them die by the gas. Well aside from Blue, because you can't kill the star. Then you have the bit where fraction from all over the world now posses the power to created murderous raptors.
[close]

The Empire Strikes Back has nothing on this sequel. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Jun 23, 2018, 08:24:28 AM
I liked the cinematography and effects. It's a nice movie to look at.

BUT WHAT IS THE NARRATIVE OF THIS MOVIE?

I'm confused at what the narrative actually is.
The people we're following don't do ANYTHING.
Well. They perform a blood transfusion.
Besides that, people are just... there?
All the things they're supposed to do, they fail at!
I almost feel like Friar Tuck (the pachy :laugh:) was the closest thing to a protagonist.

Spoiler
She (the pachy) does all the things that a hero should do in the boundaries of the story.
1. Gets off the island (off screen obv)
2. Escapes her enclosure and frees some humans while doing it.
3. Spoils the party and takes out some bad dudes.
4. Escapes the haunted house to freedom.(pretty sure it does, i've already forgotten a lot of this movie :-X)

The endoraptor sub plot... err main plot? is killed by PURE LUCK. The people are there for NO REASON.

This STORY is terrible and the characters are bland cliches.
[close]

Also, rip big momma dino  :'(  cheap nasty trick from a pretentious movie.

Actually, I don't give enough credit to the little girl surprise, shines light on an ethical discussion, so that's good I guess.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 23, 2018, 09:26:36 AM
The movies narrative is opening Pandora's Box. People are literally just there with utterly no concept of the power before them. The Fallen Kingdom is mankind with Ian Malcolm's pretentious gruff saying "told you so" in the next movie.

God creates Dinos.
God kills Dinos.
God creates man.
Man kills God.
Man creates dinos.
Dinos kill Man.
Dino's create God.
God creates Man.
Man kills Dinos.
God kills Man.
...
God creates AI.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 23, 2018, 09:53:59 AM
Well the first JP had also quite the depressing ending ... that I did not have any problem with and it looked impressive with all the great shots... it was the third act that made me depressed and deflated with those cringy cliche villains and dayplayers.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Jun 23, 2018, 10:07:28 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jun 23, 2018, 09:26:36 AM
The movies narrative is opening Pandora's Box. People are literally just there with utterly no concept of the power before them. The Fallen Kingdom is mankind with Ian Malcolm's pretentious gruff saying "told you so" in the next movie.

God creates Dinos.
God kills Dinos.
God creates man.
Man kills God.
Man creates dinos.
Dinos kill Man.
Dino's create God.
God creates Man.
Man kills Dinos.
God kills Man.
...
God creates AI.

:o There are no strings on whiterabbit  :laugh:

SRS tho... that as you say at the expense of the characters we're meant to cheer for?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 23, 2018, 11:16:27 AM
I hate to admit it
Spoiler
but none of them were in any danger of dying. However, the "good guys" are the ones through wholly virtuous intentions allowed all hell to break out of the box and escape into real life. The characters are constantly reminding us of that throughout the entire film. Of whom are the very people we are meant to be cheering for, the very people that will get all of us killed. Then again, a child watching this wouldn't immediately recognize that and it is camouflaged with cartoony over the top villains and a ton of Dino-chomping action. All of the darkness is saved for us adults.

However yea, just look at Malcom trying to explain it to an incompetent congress, the dumbass help only thinking of trophies and pay checks and the naive heroes who keep making the same dumb mistakes. Even when Claire makes the right decision, the next generation goes ahead and pushes the button anyways. Copy or not.
[close]

Mankind is clueless in the movie and that is because we can't help but destroy ourselves. The madness of the villains is the point.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: blood. on Jun 23, 2018, 11:57:29 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jun 23, 2018, 11:16:27 AM
Spoiler
but none of them were in any danger of dying. However, the "good guys" are the ones through wholly virtuous intentions allowed all hell to break out of the box and escape into real life.....

......Of whom are the very people we are meant to be cheering for, the very people that will get all of us killed.
[close]

Well yeah... that's pretty common in a lot of movies, it creates a problem that needs to be resolved and sets the foundation for character development, to change their views, right their wrongs while solving the problems they put themselves in... none of which happened in this film! they're just along for the ride. I guess humans as a whole could be viewed as a single cumulative character, and the dinosaurs as their own character... and the indoraptor the demon in the closet. I guess the movie makes a little more sense looking at it like that... but it is still at the expense of the individuals
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 23, 2018, 12:24:10 PM
This is going to be the best of the new films, hands down. I still can't believe Bayona had me ugly sobbing over f**king dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 23, 2018, 12:47:09 PM
Quote from: blood. on Jun 23, 2018, 11:57:29 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jun 23, 2018, 11:16:27 AM
Spoiler
but none of them were in any danger of dying. However, the "good guys" are the ones through wholly virtuous intentions allowed all hell to break out of the box and escape into real life.....

......Of whom are the very people we are meant to be cheering for, the very people that will get all of us killed.
[close]

Well yeah... that's pretty common in a lot of movies, it creates a problem that needs to be resolved and sets the foundation for character development, to change their views, right their wrongs while solving the problems they put themselves in... none of which happened in this film! they're just along for the ride. I guess humans as a whole could be viewed as a single cumulative character, and the dinosaurs as their own character... and the indoraptor the demon in the closet. I guess the movie makes a little more sense looking at it like that... but it is still at the expense of the individuals
This is the middle part of what appears to be an obvious trilogy
Spoiler
and yes there wasn't any character development. The first movie ends in disaster. Remember that poor lady who was watching the kids? That was straight up unemphatic and never even acknowledge in any way if I recall correctly. This movie then ends on an even bigger disaster. This franchises is focusing directly on the message that human beings are incapable of understanding. The only thing that understands at the end of the film was Blue when he forsake his father and leaves, again.

All that aside just where the hell are they going to take the next movie. Weaponized dino's conquering the world? Dino-human hybrids as was originally envisioned? Or dare I say the planet of the apes route. In which case the humans really don't have much value anyways.
[close]

I really have to watch the movie again but I had a great time because I watched it as a horror/sci-fi/dystopian movie. Thinking to myself ok, I get it, this is the second step towards mankind's collapse. I found the hedonistic irony very assuming throughout the film. Hedonism was a central theme. Owen and Claire do everything in their power to fulfill their need for happiness all the while ignoring that happiness is as simple as warm embrace.

Quote from: Gate on Jun 23, 2018, 12:24:10 PM
This is going to be the best of the new films, hands down. I still can't believe Bayona had me ugly sobbing over f**king dinosaurs.
You're making me feel uncomfortable. I didn't cry one tear. While that dino was stuck on the pier all I was thinking about was how the f**k could owen out run a pyroclastic flow and why isn't that dino dead yet. And then why did they have the dinos, even when running for their lives, still try and kill other dinos. Well yea I know, for the action.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Highland on Jun 23, 2018, 12:52:18 PM
I saw this today, not bad, decent and some very nice effects and visuals. Nice sound too. Probably about on par with JW, maybe slightly below.

One thing that puzzled me about the end

Spoiler
did they just mean to copy the endings of the other movies like a tribute? The T Rex shot I would believe if you told me it was the exact scene from JP just copy and pasted. Pratt says buy to blue (again) like JW and then we get the pterodactyls flying off like JP2 ( was it that one?).

I felt like the ending was just a montage of all the other endings.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 23, 2018, 12:55:32 PM
It's fan service, that ole T-rex had a lot of cameos. No one can complain the T-rex didn't get screen time. Plus that beginning, more fan service. The fan servicing was strong in this movie. However you did notice that nice big town down there right at the end... right? The ending is very different from JP.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Highland on Jun 23, 2018, 01:06:18 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jun 23, 2018, 12:55:32 PM
It's fan service, that ole T-rex had a lot of cameos. No one can complain the T-rex didn't get screen time. Plus that beginning, more fan service. The fan servicing was strong in this movie. However you did notice that nice big town down there right at the end... right? The ending is very different from JP.

Well
Spoiler
there's tribute, then there's just a straight up copy. The T Rex literally does the same pose with the same piece of music, that's a scene everyone remembers clearly and it was exactly the same, not a bit like it, exactly.

Also yeah...raptor roaring at City , same as JW T Rex ending, front shot of creature pans around to behind, creature roars cut credits.

The only thing was yeah, it was suburbia
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 23, 2018, 08:19:20 PM
The dread is entirely different.

Spoiler
In both JP and JW. In both of the movies the dino's are confined. That includes JP2 and JP3, both of which gives us a taste of rampage/escaping dinos. However in JW2 the cat is out of the bag. The ending plays homage to all the previous films but also ups the stakes. I mean the T-rex used to just roar for the camera. This time he's roar as a predator and that lion is going to lose.
[close]

It's kind of annoying how a lot of people see this as only being mindless dino action, which of course a lot of it is. However it is also about our nature to destroy ourselves and the danger of genetics. Lots of movie use inorganic AI as the threat but good old fashion natural intelligence can also eat us.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naginata on Jun 23, 2018, 09:51:48 PM
Well.

They didn't quite Gremlins 2 it, but my God did they just not give a f**k. This was the correct attitude, as it turned out, and the film was better for it. The Dinosaurs are the good guys, the venture capitalists are the bad guys, and Trump-quoting military contractors are there to be slaughtered while I giggle and bounce in my seat like a six year old Hellion on a sugar rush. Not since 'Flesh' ran in 2000AD has dinosaur mayhem been so gleefully misanthropic.

Spoiler

Was only the only one thinking 'PUSH THE DAMN BUTTON' at the climax? Well done, Clone Girl!
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Highland on Jun 23, 2018, 11:58:18 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jun 23, 2018, 08:19:20 PM
The dread is entirely different.

Spoiler
In both JP and JW. In both of the movies the dino's are confined. That includes JP2 and JP3, both of which gives us a taste of rampage/escaping dinos. However in JW2 the cat is out of the bag. The ending plays homage to all the previous films but also ups the stakes. I mean the T-rex used to just roar for the camera. This time he's roar as a predator and that lion is going to lose.
[close]

It's kind of annoying how a lot of people see this as only being mindless dino action, which of course a lot of it is. However it is also about our nature to destroy ourselves and the danger of genetics. Lots of movie use inorganic AI as the threat but good old fashion natural intelligence can also eat us.

No I like the premise and all that, and I thought the film was decent but the but I'm talking about is
Spoiler
when he rips the bad guy in half, it's quite literally the exact image and music from Jurassic Park when the flag falls. I'm interested to see them overly those two scenes. It's not just a bit like it, to me it looked like the copied it exactly.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 24, 2018, 12:28:28 AM
Oh gotcha, perhaps it's just a play on man repeating the same mistakes? However I think it was just a homage and hell maybe they did use the same computer model as was used in Jurassic Park 2? After watching a lot of these cgi movies you do start to notice the same models being used, just with different skins. It's the same with Disney traditionally animated films. All the scenes are preformed by human beings, filmed and then animators draw over the scene frame by frame to add a life like animation quality to the movie. Of course actors are very expensive and to do so for every movie was a cost that couldn't be justified. So they just reused the same human captured movement and drew over it for multiple movies. Gotta save money somewhere.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: irn on Jun 24, 2018, 01:08:51 AM
I'm really interested to see what they do in the sequel. It looks like it could veer wildly away from the rest of the series.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Highland on Jun 24, 2018, 01:21:57 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jun 24, 2018, 12:28:28 AM
Oh gotcha, perhaps it's just a play on man repeating the same mistakes? However I think it was just a homage and hell maybe they did use the same computer model as was used in Jurassic Park 2? After watching a lot of these cgi movies you do start to notice the same models being used, just with different skins. It's the same with Disney traditionally animated films. All the scenes are preformed by human beings, filmed and then animators draw over the scene frame by frame to add a life like animation quality to the movie. Of course actors are very expensive and to do so for every movie was a cost that couldn't be justified. So they just reused the same human captured movement and drew over it for multiple movies. Gotta save money somewhere.

There were quite obviously direct copys , I always wonder why they do it, like nobody's going to notice ( girl pulling little hatch down).

As for the direction it's tough, I think the best part of this movie was the park, the best part of two was the park. So going full city...dunno, you better have a good script.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 24, 2018, 02:05:24 AM
I think they're considering going full apocalypse but I doubt they have the support for it. Whelp, at least they have options.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Jun 24, 2018, 04:40:18 AM
Spoiler
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7s1hG4-JEo (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7s1hG4-JEo)
[close]

This is by far my favorite ad for the film and what I wish there was more of with Bayona attached.

Plz lose Treverrow as writer and/or director.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 24, 2018, 07:09:03 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jun 23, 2018, 11:16:27 AM
Of whom are the very people we are meant to be cheering for, the very people that will get all of us killed.

Have you checked out the Extinction Now! marketing campaign for Fallen Kingdom? You should read their twitter debates with the DPG. Seems people within the universe of Jurassic feel the same.

www.ExtinctionNow.com

https://twitter.com/Extinction_Now
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naginata on Jun 24, 2018, 01:53:23 PM
^ The circa-1997 camcorder footage of the San Diego incident on their Twitter feed is AMAZING.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Jacku on Jun 25, 2018, 04:13:00 PM
A very silly film. I was expecting a Marvel film and it was a Marvel film.

Spoiler
Why is everyone acting like keeping dinosaurs alive is a problem? It's not going to destroy mankind to let 20 dinosaurs roam around. I love JP but the argument that dinosaurs are dangerous is like saying Lions will eat you.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: 426Buddy on Jun 25, 2018, 04:22:47 PM
Regardless I want to see a world torn apart by the resurgence of dinosaur kind. Lets see some characters survive in the post dinosaur apocalypse.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Never say no to Panda! on Jun 25, 2018, 04:49:25 PM
Is there a SINGLE total apocalypse scenario that COULD work and wouldn't be TOTALLY dumb?
Those few dinosaurs could kill dozens/hundreds maybe even thousands of people before taken down, but there are not enough for a real threat.
Even if you got modified & intelligent versions - the big ones are easy to spot...

Guess you would need a second element to keep the population busy not taking care of the dinosaurs, like the end of the world (sudden volcanic eruptions all over the planet or an epidemic like in Planet of the Apes).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 25, 2018, 04:55:12 PM
Quote from: Never say no to Panda! on Jun 25, 2018, 04:49:25 PM
Is there a SINGLE total apocalypse scenario that COULD work and wouldn't be TOTALLY dumb?
Those few dinosaurs could kill dozens/hundreds maybe even thousands of people before taken down, but there are not enough for a real threat.
Even if you got modified & intelligent versions - the big ones are easy to spot...

Guess you would need a second element to keep the population busy not taking care of the dinosaurs, like the end of the world (sudden volcanic eruptions all over the planet or an epidemic like in Planet of the Apes).

The novels brush off the concept of the Dx virus, which several scripts have focused on. Dinosaurs coming to the mainland, spreading this prehistoric virus and wiping out entire populations.

http://jurassicpark.wikia.com/wiki/DX
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 25, 2018, 05:02:27 PM
The beloved dinosaurs, T rex and Blue will have the DX virus and they will have to kill them to eradicate the virus... that saves you a trip to the cinema in 2021... welcome!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Highland on Jun 26, 2018, 12:53:52 AM
Quote from: Jacku on Jun 25, 2018, 04:13:00 PM
A very silly film. I was expecting a Marvel film and it was a Marvel film.

Spoiler
Why is everyone acting like keeping dinosaurs alive is a problem? It's not going to destroy mankind to let 20 dinosaurs roam around. I love JP but the argument that dinosaurs are dangerous is like saying Lions will eat you.
[close]

Probably wouldn't be a fun trip to the beach knowing there's a Mososaur out there.

I guess on that a good idea for a movie could have been a team of hunters tasked with killing the Dinosaurs off. Then another team trying to save them. That way you could have stayed on the island the whole time then let them escape if you want to set up the apocalypse.

I'm ok with the JP movies though, I view them more like Die Hard or Madmax. It's not really a big epic story, it's just Dinos running around a park, constantly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: razeak on Jun 26, 2018, 03:19:27 AM
It was decent popcorn fun. I enjoyed all of the action and there were some genuinely tense and scary moments. I wish there was more character devrlopment. Zia and the generic IT guy were fun. The villains were campy fun. I though the autcion guy was awesome and Wu was very sleazy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Jun 26, 2018, 05:19:32 AM
Quote from: 426Buddy on Jun 25, 2018, 04:22:47 PM
Regardless I want to see a world torn apart by the resurgence of dinosaur kind. Lets see some characters survive in the post dinosaur apocalypse.

It would be too much like Planet of the Apes. Not that Dawn wasn't a good movie, but there doesn't seem to be any obvious way to pull it off that doesn't seem silly. You'd have to have Wu being some kind of eco bad dude who thinks the dinosaurs are earth's proper inhabitants who were unfairly wiped out. Or somehow everybody gets emp'd and the dinosaurs just happen to take over the world after about 50 years.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 26, 2018, 05:40:10 AM
https://twitter.com/io9/status/1011386200551317504
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 26, 2018, 06:37:55 AM
Quote from: Never say no to Panda! on Jun 25, 2018, 04:49:25 PM
Is there a SINGLE total apocalypse scenario that COULD work and wouldn't be TOTALLY dumb?
Those few dinosaurs could kill dozens/hundreds maybe even thousands of people before taken down, but there are not enough for a real threat.
Even if you got modified & intelligent versions - the big ones are easy to spot...

Guess you would need a second element to keep the population busy not taking care of the dinosaurs, like the end of the world (sudden volcanic eruptions all over the planet or an epidemic like in Planet of the Apes).
The original dinosaurs are not the threat and will probably all be killed shortly after the break out. The real treat are the intelligent man made dinosaurs. Plus the volcanic idea already exists in that Isla Nublar is said to be in the process of exploding. Which would be enough to handicap humanity in this day and age. Take away all those neat satellites, infrared cameras etc plus also creating pandemics and massive food shortages. It would be very planet of the apes, if the dinos end up being as smart as the apes.

However all that aside, even the advance dinos can't eat a tank. Yet if they become as commonplace as a drone... yea that's more planet of the apes. Giant asteroid anyone? It is hard to think of a good way to go about it without reusing old concepts like viruses. A single bullet almost killed blue after all. Still what if the dinosaurs are bullet proof? Or have anti-electronic warfare elements? Yea a mix of Saturday morning cartoons and b rated horror.

hmmm

Maybe steal the egg idea from aliens and have the dino's multiple through facehuggers. I mean this is genetics movie we're talking about. Life always finds a way.  :laugh: x10
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: skhellter on Jun 26, 2018, 11:25:45 AM
a MUCH better film than Jurassic World... Tightly directed, without any of the annoying character stuff (the kids) or
even the weirdly placed dinosaur mayhem that made that film feel very "cruel". (the assistant's death)

might be the best of the sequels, the more i think on it.
(It just doesnt have David Koepp's great dialogue. Let's bring him back.)


But there is no realistic sequel to this film in which americans dont become a firing squad that kills all the surviving dinosaurs.

American Gun Culture has probably never met a species that it didnt want to kill and display as a trophy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 26, 2018, 11:37:46 AM
I found most of the characters insufferable but yeah still kinda like this one better than the previous one... this feels a bit more rushed in the beginning but considering 35 minutes were cut I'll blame it on that... still think it wraps up way too 'nicely' villain wise... dino included.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 26, 2018, 12:14:35 PM
Quote from: skhellter on Jun 26, 2018, 11:25:45 AM
a MUCH better film than Jurassic World... Tightly directed, without any of the annoying character stuff (the kids) or
even the weirdly placed dinosaur mayhem that made that film feel very "cruel". (the assistant's death)

might be the best of the sequels, the more i think on it.
(It just doesnt have David Koepp's great dialogue. Let's bring him back.)


But there is no realistic sequel to this film in which americans dont become a firing squad that kills all the surviving dinosaurs.

American Gun Culture has probably never met a species that it didnt want to kill and display as a trophy.
You actually made a lot of good observations. The assistants death was undoubtedly cruel. However starting the next film off with Americans and their guns slaughtering the dinos and posing with their corpses could be a really great plot point. I'm thinking what if the intelligent dinos get a hold of that footage? Then again if Blue was to lead the dino revolution that would once again be way too planet of the apes.

However, if we are talking human sized dinos, who's to say they couldn't escape and hide out for some time. Reproducing and growing their numbers until the right time. The iRex was able to hide it's heat signature and camouflage itself. Plus they are smart enough to set traps for humans to spring. Humans are prone to overkill, which would likely lead to severe casualties on our side. Plus these dinos are being marketed as an army. Having more than a few sites with thousands of them could lead to all sort of logistical problems, least to the mention that humans that would want to help them.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Jacku on Jun 26, 2018, 02:43:59 PM
The only way I see the sequel going was inspired by the dinosaurs that were successfully sold off to other countries. Companies will probably clone them and sell them and they'll probably become as common as some animals

Does anyone else feel the original JP films were made in a time before blockbusters stopped being held to same standard as normal films? Characters aren't characters anymore and they don't have conversations and if you told me the same person who directed JW:FK directed JW, every MCU film, every Transformer film, Terminator Genisys, Prometheus and A:C I'd believe you. I'm triggered lol.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Highland on Jun 26, 2018, 02:48:13 PM
I dont think it was as well structured as JW, but as a spectacle it's probably up there with all of the films as the best. Plenty of Dino action .
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Jacku on Jun 26, 2018, 03:03:04 PM
I was watching JP3 and although people seem to hate it I just could never rank a JW film higher. Too me a JP3 has scenes and moments of tension and feels like a dinosaur film like it's supposed too. You feel the characters trapped on the island, the raptors feel dangerous and real, the plane crash feels grounded, no big orange explosions. The whole opening has no on screen dinosaur but is still affecting.
Meanwhile JW:FK can't even make me believe the jungle wasn't CGI.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 26, 2018, 07:27:28 PM
Quote from: skhellter on Jun 26, 2018, 11:25:45 AM
might be the best of the sequels, the more i think on it.
(It just doesnt have David Koepp's great dialogue. Let's bring him back.)

I can do without the characters using a power outage as a tortured metaphor for not respecting the power of science. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 26, 2018, 09:48:16 PM
(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/958586909328755414/F75A86F828B43B9D2F39F54DCED7C6E7757A95DD/)

I made yet another mistake.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 26, 2018, 10:26:25 PM
Quote from: Jacku on Jun 26, 2018, 03:03:04 PM
Meanwhile JW:FK can't even make me believe the jungle wasn't CGI.
Most of the Jungle was actual jungle though... being that it was shot on location in a rain forest in Kaneohe and on the big island.

Quote from: Jacku on Jun 26, 2018, 02:43:59 PM
The only way I see the sequel going was inspired by the dinosaurs that were successfully sold off to other countries. Companies will probably clone them and sell them and they'll probably become as common as some animals

Does anyone else feel the original JP films were made in a time before blockbusters stopped being held to same standard as normal films? Characters aren't characters anymore and they don't have conversations and if you told me the same person who directed JW:FK directed JW, every MCU film, every Transformer film, Terminator Genisys, Prometheus and A:C I'd believe you. I'm triggered lol.
Yea but that's the exact plot of the original planet of the apes. I thought everybody wanted some a little bit different? Both MCU and Transformers have way too many character on screen, however they are clearly following the same structure throughout each iteration. Terminator Genisys was too on the nose to be liked. However you are correct that there isn't much communication any more and that's an important fact. It's what separates a movie from a spectacle.

I loved this movie for what it is but at the same time it seems to have just been exposition and possibly some blood letting to quell the wait until the next movie. It really does seem to be a stepping stone.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Jun 27, 2018, 04:18:50 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 26, 2018, 09:48:16 PM
(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/958586909328755414/F75A86F828B43B9D2F39F54DCED7C6E7757A95DD/)

I made yet another mistake.

Let them fight.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: irn on Jun 27, 2018, 07:01:53 PM
(https://i.pinimg.com/originals/45/e0/96/45e09604d4a0e90d94d47baaa6aa3f52.jpg)

So I've got a question about the opening sequence of Fallen Kingdom. After looking at the map above, how did the mosasaur escape into the sea?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 27, 2018, 07:15:35 PM
Eh, supplementary materials are always subject to change.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 27, 2018, 07:40:24 PM
http://islanublar.jurassicworld.com/park-map/

Even on the site's map, it's landlocked.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 27, 2018, 07:43:07 PM
Is it shown to be landlocked in JW 1? Because that's the only way I'd really have an issue with it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jun 27, 2018, 08:03:17 PM
Somewhere it was explained why they had to put in gates at the mosasaurus tank... but not in film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Jun 27, 2018, 09:59:04 PM
Tomorrow tweeted that they got the map wrong in JW and the lagoon has canals to the sea.

https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/1008658304841723906?s=09
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 27, 2018, 10:09:01 PM
It would have made more sense to have the island sink into the sea due to earthquake subsidence.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Jun 27, 2018, 10:20:32 PM
Quote from: irn on Jun 27, 2018, 07:01:53 PM
(https://i.pinimg.com/originals/45/e0/96/45e09604d4a0e90d94d47baaa6aa3f52.jpg)

So I've got a question about the opening sequence of Fallen Kingdom. After looking at the map above, how did the mosasaur escape into the sea?

Life finds a way.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jun 27, 2018, 11:12:12 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jun 27, 2018, 10:09:01 PM
It would have made more sense to have the island sink into the sea due to earthquake subsidence.

I think the idea was to allude to the Cretaceous extinction event. A meteor impact would have been a bit too on-the-nose, but half of India exploded in a chain of mass vulcanism a few thousand years before the impact, and it's thought to have been a major factor in the severity of the extinction.

A big part of the film's theme was exploring the morality of de-extinction, so I thought the volcano tied into that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 27, 2018, 11:31:40 PM
Quote from: Vertigo on Jun 27, 2018, 11:12:12 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jun 27, 2018, 10:09:01 PM
It would have made more sense to have the island sink into the sea due to earthquake subsidence.

I think the idea was to allude to the Cretaceous extinction event. A meteor impact would have been a bit too on-the-nose, but half of India exploded in a chain of mass vulcanism a few thousand years before the impact, and it's thought to have been a major factor in the severity of the extinction.

A big part of the film's theme was exploring the morality of de-extinction, so I thought the volcano tied into that.
Oh my bad, I was talking about how the landlocked lake could have gotten near the sea. If the island sunk a hundred meters due to earth quake subsidence the ocean would fill in the now lower areas of the island. However it seems to just be a mistake on the maps.

Having the volcano erupt was reason enough to create a need to evacuate the dinosaurs and it provides a doomsday scenario where the dino's could gain an advantage over humans. If an island the size of Isla Nublar explodes it would affect the global population of Earth.

However it was likely a series of events that killed off the dinosaurs. From the Deacon Traps to oxygen depletion and any number of other smaller events to finally a massive rock from space finishing them off. The dinosaurs appeared to be in decline long before the asteroid impact event. It may be too on the nose but an asteroid impact would definitely be within the theme if the goal is for dinos to take over the Earth.

Still just how many genetically weaponized dinosaurs would be needed to overwhelm the US? I think that number might be significantly less than many of us assume it is.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Highland on Jun 28, 2018, 12:47:08 AM
They are just animals at the end of the day, you'd have to have them breed like Kangaroo's and humanity to somehow forget how to kill animals.

The Planet of the apes/12 monkey's disease scenario seems more plausible, but these movies were never about realism anyway.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 28, 2018, 01:25:09 AM
I think you guys are under estimating what a stampede of ceratopsians could do to a small town. Or a group of sauropods to an entire city.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Highland on Jun 28, 2018, 01:31:36 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 28, 2018, 01:25:09 AM
I think you guys are under estimating what a stampede of ceratopsians could do to a small town. Or a group of sauropods to an entire city.

Why would they do that though, you don't see groups of Rhinos or Elephants wipe out city's in South Africa and with no food source in the city, it seems to me that the battle would take place in open spaces.

What they would be asking here is that somehow the Dinosaurs team up, which is just not how nature works.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Jun 28, 2018, 02:19:38 AM
Quote from: Highland on Jun 28, 2018, 01:31:36 AM
Why would they do that though,

Because they were frightened.

Quote from: Highland on Jun 28, 2018, 01:31:36 AM
What they would be asking here is that somehow the Dinosaurs team up, which is just not how nature works.

These are not natural dinosaurs, so this is not technically nature. The whole concept of blue is crazy in and of itself. Like a raptor wouldn't destroy every piece of living meat that came within sniffing distance. And blue already teamed up with rexy in JW.

Above all, it's a movie. Suspending your concept of reality is a necessary part of the experience. Some folks just want to see dinosaurs trampling through the streets of an overgrown apocalyptic New York. Simply because it's fun to think about and would be cool to see.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Highland on Jun 28, 2018, 05:30:52 AM
Quote from: Huggs on Jun 28, 2018, 02:19:38 AM
Quote from: Highland on Jun 28, 2018, 01:31:36 AM
Why would they do that though,

Because they were frightened.

Quote from: Highland on Jun 28, 2018, 01:31:36 AM
What they would be asking here is that somehow the Dinosaurs team up, which is just not how nature works.

These are not natural dinosaurs, so this is not technically nature. The whole concept of blue is crazy in and of itself. Like a raptor wouldn't destroy every piece of living meat that came within sniffing distance. And blue already teamed up with rexy in JW.

Above all, it's a movie. Suspending your concept of reality is a necessary part of the experience. Some folks just want to see dinosaurs trampling through the streets of an overgrown apocalyptic New York. Simply because it's fun to think about and would be cool to see.

No I totally get that and I don't go for the realistic behaviour of Dinosaurs obviously, but asking the audience to go from a few contained Dinosaurs on some islands to mass extinction level because 12 dinosaurs escaped a mansion is starting to stretch it just a tiny bit.

They'd have to come up with a better arch than a Blade Runner title explaining that the dinosaurs got out (not even in pairs...) and have now taken over the world/America.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 28, 2018, 06:48:17 AM
Quote from: Highland on Jun 28, 2018, 01:31:36 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jun 28, 2018, 01:25:09 AM
I think you guys are under estimating what a stampede of ceratopsians could do to a small town. Or a group of sauropods to an entire city.

Why would they do that though, you don't see groups of Rhinos or Elephants wipe out city's in South Africa and with no food source in the city, it seems to me that the battle would take place in open spaces.

What they would be asking here is that somehow the Dinosaurs team up, which is just not how nature works.

Literally powerlines, skyscrapers, buildings, and cars could be destroyed simply from a brachiosaur walking into the wrong place.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 28, 2018, 06:56:35 AM
Quote from: Highland on Jun 28, 2018, 05:30:52 AM
Quote from: Huggs on Jun 28, 2018, 02:19:38 AM
Quote from: Highland on Jun 28, 2018, 01:31:36 AM
Why would they do that though,

Because they were frightened.

Quote from: Highland on Jun 28, 2018, 01:31:36 AM
What they would be asking here is that somehow the Dinosaurs team up, which is just not how nature works.

These are not natural dinosaurs, so this is not technically nature. The whole concept of blue is crazy in and of itself. Like a raptor wouldn't destroy every piece of living meat that came within sniffing distance. And blue already teamed up with rexy in JW.

Above all, it's a movie. Suspending your concept of reality is a necessary part of the experience. Some folks just want to see dinosaurs trampling through the streets of an overgrown apocalyptic New York. Simply because it's fun to think about and would be cool to see.

No I totally get that and I don't go for the realistic behaviour of Dinosaurs obviously, but asking the audience to go from a few contained Dinosaurs on some islands to mass extinction level because 12 dinosaurs escaped a mansion is starting to stretch it just a tiny bit.

They'd have to come up with a better arch than a Blade Runner title explaining that the dinosaurs got out (not even in pairs...) and have now taken over the world/America.
Umm dude we're not talking about those few dinos that escaped. I'm fairly certain they will all be killed before the intro of the next movie. I'm talking about how many genetically engineered weaponized dinos would it take. Which by the way are highly intelligent and programed as weapons of mass destruction. How many of those would it take?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Highland on Jun 28, 2018, 08:47:24 AM
Yeah well that would need some explaining outside of moustache twirling badies offering (strangely low amounts?) Money for Dino weapons.

That's like at least another movie away, maybe two.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jun 28, 2018, 10:26:35 AM
Quote from: Highland on Jun 28, 2018, 08:47:24 AM
Yeah well that would need some explaining outside of moustache twirling badies offering (strangely low amounts?) Money for Dino weapons.

That's like at least another movie away, maybe two.
You know of all the things in the movie that can be considered unbelievable... the prices the dinos sold for was the most unbelievable part of them all.  :laugh:

Yea at least one movie away. Still they are pitching to us an army of hybridized T-Rex/Raptors. I mean it must be coming.

Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcanitbesaturdaynow.com%2Fimages%2Ffpics%2F953%2Fapril_2_81___large.jpg&hash=6942a441feafc662309971db37c7d251c2ee9e40)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Highland on Jun 28, 2018, 01:30:38 PM
Yeah they were like "Twenty Meeelion dollers" sold!

and I'm thinking about football transfers and that's like a mid ranged crappy player....
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 29, 2018, 06:27:36 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcpeOiZC1mo&t=4s
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space_Dementia on Jun 29, 2018, 08:01:07 PM
Here is my review of Fallen Kingdom... one of my anticipated movies of the year, a massive fan of the original Jurassic Park movie and its sequel The Lost World... I also adored Jurassic World, I may be in the minority there but hey!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HgGGGfQBzk

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: bb-15 on Jun 30, 2018, 10:34:56 PM
Quote from: Huggs on Jun 28, 2018, 02:19:38 AMSuspending your concept of reality is a necessary part of the experience. Some folks just want to see dinosaurs trampling through the streets of an overgrown apocalyptic New York. Simply because it's fun to think about and would be cool to see.

Yes. That describes schlock or B movie. Liking schlock is as personal taste as it can get.
I like some Godzilla movies. The stories are pretty much the same. The character roles are almost all the same.
But it's about the experience of monsters trampling down things while for a long time the enjoyable Godzilla films can't be taken seriously.

* Is "Fallen World" (FW} schlock good enough for me?
Well it has the actor Rafe Spall who was also in "Prometheus" and that was a moment of entertainment imo.
Technically "FW" has some nice camerawork and impressive set design.

Otherwise it's repetitive schlock which is a far leap from the more hard science fiction, original, "Jurassic Park" (which follows a lot of the novel).
In this linked review "FW" is compared with Sharknado.
https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2018/06/jurassic-world-fallen-kingdom-review-this-nonsense-has-gone-full-sharknado/

* The thing about low budget B level / SYFY channel schlock is that those films don't pretend to be serious. They know they are nonsense and don't pretend to be otherwise.
"FW" by contrast is trying to pull on the hearts of the audience.
It wants us to believe and to care mixed with nonsense.
So for me "FW" was not good drama or enjoyable schlock.

;)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jun 30, 2018, 10:52:09 PM
The JWE thread is kind of dead, so I'll tease things I mess around with here as well.
(https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/260472369334714369/462751597827588106/unknown.png)

One of the things I love about the game is that I can actually create themed exhibits. I built a Jurassic Safari, all featuring Jurassic Era Animals. Pictured: Mamenchisaurus, Dilophosaurus, Kentrosaurus. Remarkably, the four dilos behave themselves well!


(https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/958587215612547797/B8C6D10FA75B87A73D60E69EADCC3F2018D013C8/)

Here's my Isla Nublar at Dusk ;)

I was forced to house a Suchomimus with four Velociraptors. I don't trust the little bastards, but they play mostly nice. I also, totally intentionally, put the Giganatosaurus paddock right next to Gallimimus Valley and T-Rex Kingdom.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr.Turok on Jul 01, 2018, 03:44:08 AM
Saw this movie while I was on vacation in Cancun (which by the way was awesome!) and hands down got me waiting for the third movie. Bruh I gotta talk about the Indoraptor for a bit, cuz this thing stole the spotlight at the last act.

I gotta love the fact that the Indoraptor is the first true dinosaur based mass murder ah-la Freddy Krueger and Chucky. While the Indominus Rex was a huge psychotic mass killer with a intelligent mind, it was a mentally ill creature that one can share some sympathies at least. Just events in real life animal behavior in captivity, without any positive contact/relations with another living being, small spaces, no simulation, and no type of activity can render a poor animal into a state of psychosis and violent behavior. Add to the fact that it's DNA is pumped with the most aggressive carnivores that one can stuff a DNA strand into and you got a deadly killer in your mist.  The Indoraptor is different. Its a pure first ever dino serial killer with a boner for sadism.

For one thing, when he made that first ever kill, the lead up itself was one of the second best introductions to a dinosaur I've ever had right behind Rexy's/Roberta's entrance into the big screen back in 1993. This guy was straight up having fun with its kills. He could have just killed Wheatly when he got close enough....but the f**ker toys with him at first by PRETENDING to be tranquilized and all the while he tries to nab a tooth, he flicks his tail to mess with him and SMILES about it. Like...this thing has Wheatly's death planned and is enjoying the future result of dismembering the bastard. Not only he smiles out of amusement at plotting something nasty, implies that he has a human-like understanding of facial expressions co-relating to feelings, the ability to imagine a future scenario, and be sadistically amused at said future scenario just denotes that this creature is far more human than you'd expect. Granted he deserved it for being a awful animal abuser but man he took his time to rip his arm off and roared at his face long enough for him to realize that it's over for him.  Lets also add to the fact that he could have killed Maisie right in the bed there but he slowly stalked over to her just to f**k with her. At least the dinosaurs before killed out of hunger, self-defense or territorial behavior. This fella just wanted to f**k with you long enough for him to savor it all. This motherf**ker is a goddamm vicious and murderous troll and I love it!

Let's also talk about the design. I'm digging the 4 legged look that breaks away from the usual theropod stance. Not only its long limbed, but neck is long, strong, and swift like a snake. It also adds to a huge creeper look, as it just stalks, runs, and outright sprint towards victims like a desperate madman. Can I also share with my fellow alien fans that he definitely gave a strong xenomorph vib via glistening white teeth against a jet black body, prone to letting out a low hiss to cornered prey, prowls with a low-profile, able to silently climb up and down walls, elongated profile, a genetic abomination with surprising intelligence to offset an extremely lethal nature. Especially gave off a gothic horror vib due to being in a castle/mansion in a dark and stormy night, with a pinch of werewolf as it howled in the moonlight. Cheesy one might say but nah man it just added to how mad this f**ker was and I'm glad they took it all the way, I could tell they had fun bringing this creature to life. Overall, Indoraptor is my second favorite dinosaur in the franchise by far.

*****************************************

That being said, now I wonder where is this all going to lead up. All the dinosaurs are on the loose with some captured by mobsters and evil cooperatists/rich folks which will exploit using dinosaur DNA and genetic cloning to their own means in a manner similar to nuclear weapons. Roberta is chillin with a lion up in the San Diego Zoo, which ironically the Bull Rex rampaged in the same city itself, and Blue is running the Grand Canyon. I don't see how people think its a Planet of the Apes scenario seeing its very few dinos out there but I can say for sure there will be problems. Plus its nothing a team of hunters with tranq guns can't handle either. Roberta and Blue perhaps are the only ones that can give folks a hard time as by scent alone they can avoid or track people. I have so many questions and I can't wait for the next movie. I just hope Dr. Malcolm and perhaps even Dr. Grant can come back as supporting characters for the third movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jul 01, 2018, 05:34:51 AM
Quote from: Mr.Turok on Jul 01, 2018, 03:44:08 AM
Roberta and Blue perhaps are the only ones that can give folks a hard time as by scent alone they can avoid or track people. I have so many questions and I can't wait for the next movie. I just hope Dr. Malcolm and perhaps even Dr. Grant can come back as supporting characters for the third movie.

Bro, are you forgetting that a
Spoiler
Carnotaurus is just f**king loose in the middle of the Pacific Northwest? That's some scary shit!
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr.Turok on Jul 01, 2018, 05:17:45 PM
Quote from: Gate on Jul 01, 2018, 05:34:51 AM
Quote from: Mr.Turok on Jul 01, 2018, 03:44:08 AM
Roberta and Blue perhaps are the only ones that can give folks a hard time as by scent alone they can avoid or track people. I have so many questions and I can't wait for the next movie. I just hope Dr. Malcolm and perhaps even Dr. Grant can come back as supporting characters for the third movie.

Bro, are you forgetting that a
Spoiler
Carnotaurus is just f**king loose in the middle of the Pacific Northwest? That's some scary shit!
[close]

He is a bit easier to handle tho as he is smaller....but he does have that thick skin scutes that could be a bitch for needles to penetrate through.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Jul 02, 2018, 03:32:51 AM
Quote from: Space_Dementia on Jun 29, 2018, 08:01:07 PM
I also adored Jurassic World, I may be in the minority there but hey!

Jurassic World was a great movie. Aside from the annoying kids, I loved it. It's now my second favorite Jurassic movie. After the first, of course. Nothing beats the original.

Saw it about a week after it was released. I remember I hadn't checked the weather for the day me and a cousin went to see it in theaters. Drove straight into and through a hellish storm to get there, then the theater lost power at the scene where the kids find the old jeeps. I thought the theater was soundproof but god you could still hear the thunder. The audio was the first thing to come back on about a minute later, and it played without video for several minutes. The whole theater was black as pitch, and the sounds of the Indominous sniffing around with the thunder cracking was really wild.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naginata on Jul 02, 2018, 04:11:30 AM
I don't think it should be an apocalyptic situation, though; dinosaurs being 'back' and breeding in the wild doesn't have to end civilization to cause major harm. For me, it's much more interesting to imagine what the world looks like when human civilization has to learn to co-exist with wild dinosaurs and contend with JP's cloning/gengineering tech circulating.

In other words, the world doesn't end - it just gets much stranger.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jul 02, 2018, 05:32:02 AM
Quote from: Naginata on Jul 02, 2018, 04:11:30 AM
I don't think it should be an apocalyptic situation, though; dinosaurs being 'back' and breeding in the wild doesn't have to end civilization to cause major harm. For me, it's much more interesting to imagine what the world looks like when human civilization has to learn to co-exist with wild dinosaurs and contend with JP's cloning/gengineering tech circulating.

In other words, the world doesn't end - it just gets much stranger.

I'm assuming that JW didn't have a lysene contingency plan like the original park?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Highland on Jul 02, 2018, 01:20:23 PM
Quote from: Gate on Jul 02, 2018, 05:32:02 AM
Quote from: Naginata on Jul 02, 2018, 04:11:30 AM
I don't think it should be an apocalyptic situation, though; dinosaurs being 'back' and breeding in the wild doesn't have to end civilization to cause major harm. For me, it's much more interesting to imagine what the world looks like when human civilization has to learn to co-exist with wild dinosaurs and contend with JP's cloning/gengineering tech circulating.

In other words, the world doesn't end - it just gets much stranger.

I'm assuming that JW didn't have a lysene contingency plan like the original park?

Well the Dinosaurs shook that off anyway.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jul 02, 2018, 10:06:16 PM
I don't think it's going to be full Apocalypse in the next movie. We've still gotta have human-dino hybrids first. I don't think it's a secret where they are going next.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Jul 02, 2018, 10:19:10 PM
Trevorrow has said that they will be going away from Hybrids after Fallen Kingdom.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: 426Buddy on Jul 02, 2018, 10:35:26 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jul 02, 2018, 10:06:16 PM
I don't think it's going to be full Apocalypse in the next movie. We've still gotta have human-dino hybrids first. I don't think it's a secret where they are going next.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Forig05.deviantart.net%2Fd8b2%2Ff%2F2012%2F237%2F9%2F5%2Fanthro_calender_project___december_2013_by_ulario-d5cf0t1.jpg&hash=ef6c820fd1eaf46c2863b8075f5cc5dc65837765)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 02, 2018, 10:40:44 PM
Quote from: 426Buddy on Jul 02, 2018, 10:35:26 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jul 02, 2018, 10:06:16 PM
I don't think it's going to be full Apocalypse in the next movie. We've still gotta have human-dino hybrids first. I don't think it's a secret where they are going next.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Forig05.deviantart.net%2Fd8b2%2Ff%2F2012%2F237%2F9%2F5%2Fanthro_calender_project___december_2013_by_ulario-d5cf0t1.jpg&hash=ef6c820fd1eaf46c2863b8075f5cc5dc65837765)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstream1.gifsoup.com%2Fview5%2F4570554%2Fthe-wire-o.gif&hash=77df72f8f15493075680e69e2d8f1a20da76fc31)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Jul 02, 2018, 10:41:41 PM
Quote from: 426Buddy on Jul 02, 2018, 10:35:26 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jul 02, 2018, 10:06:16 PM
I don't think it's going to be full Apocalypse in the next movie. We've still gotta have human-dino hybrids first. I don't think it's a secret where they are going next.
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Forig05.deviantart.net%2Fd8b2%2Ff%2F2012%2F237%2F9%2F5%2Fanthro_calender_project___december_2013_by_ulario-d5cf0t1.jpg&hash=ef6c820fd1eaf46c2863b8075f5cc5dc65837765)

Roar  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Old One on Jul 02, 2018, 10:53:42 PM
I'm a thirsty binch, wouldn't say no to her.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Jul 02, 2018, 11:02:41 PM
disturbing
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Jul 02, 2018, 11:46:04 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jul 02, 2018, 10:19:10 PM
Trevorrow has said that they will be going away from Hybrids after Fallen Kingdom.
And like that this is the best news I've read all day.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Jul 03, 2018, 12:25:04 AM
This is as awful as the naked female predator image that circulated this forum a decade ago.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Jul 03, 2018, 12:37:26 AM
Quote from: Gate on Jul 03, 2018, 12:25:04 AM
This is as awful as the naked female predator image that circulated this forum a decade ago.

That snout is a bit much, but there ain't nothin' wrong with that body.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Old One on Jul 03, 2018, 01:38:07 AM
#T-minus t'ill scalie thread.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Jul 03, 2018, 01:42:05 AM
Quote from: The Old One on Jul 03, 2018, 01:38:07 AM
#T-minus t'ill scalie thread.

Long tall Scalie, she built sweet,

she got everythin', that uncle Huggs need.

:D I couldn't help it. Of course you have to read it in Mac's "gone crazy" voice.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jul 03, 2018, 12:47:33 PM
Empire Magazine's podcast (https://soundcloud.com/empiremagazine) has just released a spoiler special for Fallen Kingdom. The first half (about an hour) comprises interviews with JA Bayona and Colin Trevorrow discussing creative decisions behind both the Jurassic World films, and is a really interesting listen. Two tidbits that come out of it are that we can probably expect more of the Jurassic Park cast in the next film, and surprisingly that Colin feels a bit guilty about the lack of an educational role in JW, so the inclusion of a kickass 'palaeoveterinarian' was in the hope that the film might inspire youngsters to pursue careers as vets, in a similar way to how JP encouraged a lot (a lot) of people to become palaeontologists and scientists. Unsurprisingly the big creative theme was about how we relate to animals, which is probably why I like the film so much.

Second half is a spoiler-heavy review by the magazine's journalists. They're all pretty positive on the film, but go into fine details about what did and didn't work.

The Empire Podcast is actually my favourite podcast out there, so it's well worth tracking down more if you like this one. I normally make it a tradition to listen to their spoiler specials in the car on the way back from the cinema, but they delayed it this time to correspond with the US release.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Jul 03, 2018, 03:49:43 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Jul 02, 2018, 11:46:04 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Jul 02, 2018, 10:19:10 PM
Trevorrow has said that they will be going away from Hybrids after Fallen Kingdom.
And like that this is the best news I've read all day.

Even if they stray away from that, damage is done since the first Jurassic World. Hard to build a really good story based on that. At least Bayona's directing saved the day numerous times in Fallen Kingdom.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 04, 2018, 04:41:05 AM
Just got home from the theaters.

Just got home from the theaters.

Spoiler
I have mixed emotions, but overall I was very pleased with the movie. Everyone was right btw, the first ten minutes are just amazing! The news ticker on the bottom actually got a laugh out of me regarding the US President 😂 I felt really bad for blue and the brachiosaurus on the ledge. I'm tired so will stop here for now.

Possibly the best part for me is announcing that July 3rd is now Jurassic World day and July 4th is Jurassic Park Day instead of keeping them together on July 4th. I know, I'm weird. Lol
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jul 12, 2018, 04:11:18 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages2.static-bluray.com%2Fmovies%2Fcovers%2F200257_front.jpg&hash=dec3ddbb235784e803ad67a17ce4471a52303a4e)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages-na.ssl-images-amazon.com%2Fimages%2FI%2F91WB2-pi0TL._SL1500_.jpg&hash=235dcc9a677228c5ebc2722925142228ce4c904f)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Jul 14, 2018, 11:06:20 AM
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FBY4ZSeTa-GQ%2Fmqdefault.jpg&hash=88258d2b901047693061c4a87bbab39d70f5bed1)

Anyone notice?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jul 14, 2018, 03:27:32 PM
Nobody cares.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: D88M on Aug 05, 2018, 02:17:21 AM
I saw Fallen Kingdom some days ago, is just as bad as Jurassic World but the direction was much more professional, trevorrow needs to quit script writing forever, thought.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Aug 05, 2018, 02:34:24 AM
Quote from: D88M on Aug 05, 2018, 02:17:21 AM
I saw Fallen Kingdom some days ago, is just as bad as Jurassic World

What aspects of the first film made it a bad experience for you?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gate on Aug 05, 2018, 03:45:08 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6jp0Y8jpFI
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Aug 05, 2018, 06:32:38 AM
Just watched Fallen Kingdom.  Great fun.  I dug JW and this was better.  Had a Lost World vibe to it, but had a more natural progression to the plot.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Highland on Aug 05, 2018, 05:22:33 PM
Quote from: SM on Aug 05, 2018, 06:32:38 AM
Just watched Fallen Kingdom.  Great fun.  I dug JW and this was better.  Had a Lost World vibe to it, but had a more natural progression to the plot.

Don't know about that, you're right about it being Lost World, but the plot unravels pretty rapid as soon as they hit that mansion. JW flowed way better for me. The plot just works better on the island.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: newagescamartist on Aug 05, 2018, 11:42:19 PM
Fallen Kingdom's opening scene was legit. It felt like the first two movies. Even the island/volcano stuff was good. I liked the ship scenes too. Once they get to the mansion though I felt like everything fell apart. I wish they had just made the island rescue the movie with the volcano eruption being the climax. So much potential wasted. The film feels as if it's rushing through all the good stuff to get us to the bad stuff. I think this movie is as disappointing as Jurassic Park 3 but for entirely different reasons. That opening scene though. I felt like a kid again.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Aug 05, 2018, 11:51:22 PM
I preferred the stuff in the Resident Evil mansion.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Aug 05, 2018, 11:54:14 PM
Spoiler
I thought the whole film would spend all its time on the island with the volcano as the ticking clock and was surprised when they left so early.  However it flowed much better into the stuff at the mansion than Lost World's right turn King Kong fan film in San Diego.  Plus Lost World lost two of the best characters in Nick and Roland once you get off the island.

Owen and Claire are really likeable, Millburn makes a good - if really obvious - baddie, there's lots of cool dinosaur stuff, the hunter baddie got some suitably nasty comeuppance.
[close]

It's just a really enjoyable flick.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: newagescamartist on Aug 05, 2018, 11:55:48 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Aug 05, 2018, 11:51:22 PM
I preferred the stuff in the Resident Evil mansion.

I've heard numerous people say that. It kind of makes it fun having completely different takes on the content. I know some people would have preferred no island stuff and all mansion stuff. I think we would have gotten a better film had they focused on one or the other and just committed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Aug 06, 2018, 03:41:11 PM
Quote from: SM on Aug 05, 2018, 11:54:14 PM
Spoiler
I thought the whole film would spend all its time on the island with the volcano as the ticking clock and was surprised when they left so early.  However it flowed much better into the stuff at the mansion than Lost World's right turn King Kong fan film in San Diego.  Plus Lost World lost two of the best characters in Nick and Roland once you get off the island.

Owen and Claire are really likeable, Millburn makes a good - if really obvious - baddie, there's lots of cool dinosaur stuff, the hunter baddie got some suitably nasty comeuppance.
[close]

It's just a really enjoyable flick.

Glad you enjoyed it SM!

Quote from: Gate on Aug 05, 2018, 03:45:08 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6jp0Y8jpFI

Also its cool to see our work getting some love!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Aug 06, 2018, 07:55:58 PM
Quote from: SM on Aug 05, 2018, 11:54:14 PM
Spoiler
I thought the whole film would spend all its time on the island with the volcano as the ticking clock and was surprised when they left so early.  However it flowed much better into the stuff at the mansion than Lost World's right turn King Kong fan film in San Diego.  Plus Lost World lost two of the best characters in Nick and Roland once you get off the island.

Owen and Claire are really likeable, Millburn makes a good - if really obvious - baddie, there's lots of cool dinosaur stuff, the hunter baddie got some suitably nasty comeuppance.
[close]

It's just a really enjoyable flick.
Curious, why do you find Nick to be a good character?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Aug 06, 2018, 08:23:56 PM
He's just likeable.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 06, 2018, 08:34:26 PM
The film was good and I still prefer it to TLW or JP3, both of which are dead to me. I don't know that I preferred it more to JW, but I did like the island sequence the most, if only because seeing Carnotaurus vs. Sinoceratops put a huge smile on my face. I did like the mansion sequence as well, just not as much as the island part. J.A. Bayona knows how to set a shot up and his knack for gothic horror was very much obvious there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Aug 06, 2018, 09:22:10 PM
I just hope the script for the next one is better. It's the scripts that are holding these movies back. Trevorrow is still writing it but he's got a new partner at least.

If it wasn't for the charisma of Pratt or how much I enjoy his chemistry with Bryce Dallas Howard it would be hard to watch the movie. I really liked Zia and Franklin but the rest of the characters were forgettable and cartoonish.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: CristianoRonaldo7 on Aug 06, 2018, 10:13:12 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Aug 06, 2018, 09:22:10 PM
I just hope the script for the next one is better. It's the scripts that are holding these movies back. Trevorrow is still writing it but he's got a new partner at least.

If it wasn't for the charisma of Pratt or how much I enjoy his chemistry with Bryce Dallas Howard it would be hard to watch the movie. I really liked Zia and Franklin but the rest of the characters were forgettable and cartoonish.

I want Jeff Goldblum. Not a cameo.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DoomRulz on Aug 08, 2018, 02:57:03 AM
Quote from: MudButt on Aug 06, 2018, 09:22:10 PM
I just hope the script for the next one is better. It's the scripts that are holding these movies back. Trevorrow is still writing it but he's got a new partner at least.

If it wasn't for the charisma of Pratt or how much I enjoy his chemistry with Bryce Dallas Howard it would be hard to watch the movie. I really liked Zia and Franklin but the rest of the characters were forgettable and cartoonish.

Zia and Franklin were the ultimate in forgettable. All Franklin did was scream and Zia has one scene where she really does anything noteworthy, re: the weird blood transfusion scene.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Aug 08, 2018, 03:36:13 PM
I found their characters entertaining although they don't get much to do in the 3rd act. I doubt we'll see them return for the third film but honestly I just want them to have enough characters to get eaten in the third one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: D88M on Aug 08, 2018, 04:02:31 PM
I would not mind the girl returning for a very secondary role, the other kid on the other hand was a little irritating, cliche "scared of everything and neurotic" character, i want Dern, Neill and Goldblum back at least for a couple of scenes, and please no trevorrow directing, and he needs some serious help with the script, Bayona direction made the movie look better than what it really was. And the violence was kinda inconsistent, it needed more blood.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Aug 08, 2018, 04:25:44 PM
Almost all humans characters were forgettable, Owen and Claire especially.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: irn on Aug 08, 2018, 05:17:40 PM
I'm really interested to see where they go with the next one because I don't think there's an obvious set up for a sequel. Sure there's the dinosaurs roaming among us angle but that's not a story in and of itself.

Outside of the JW trilogy I always thought a cool idea for a sequel would purely just involve a small group of people being hunted by a pack of velociraptors for the entire film. Rarely seeing them for lots of tension. Basically like the The Grey but in a jungle instead of the Arctic Circle and raptors instead of wolves. Such a film in the series could never happen, of course, as it's not the spectacle expected of a blockbuster entry.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Aug 09, 2018, 01:18:25 AM
So JP3 effectively but upping the raptors and minimising the Spinosaurus and pteradactyls.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Aug 09, 2018, 04:51:23 AM
A situation like "the grey" but with raptors? Well, it's gonna be a short film. The Raptors would make short work of that task.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Aug 09, 2018, 05:27:55 AM
I'm the only one who finds the design of the hybrids somewhat similar to the fictional dinosaurs of  2005's King Kong? especially in the teeth...

(https://i.imgur.com/YyVN13W.jpg)

Quote from: irn on Aug 08, 2018, 05:17:40 PM
I'm really interested to see where they go with the next one because I don't think there's an obvious set up for a sequel. Sure there's the dinosaurs roaming among us angle but that's not a story in and of itself.

How about
Spoiler
the human cloning theme.
[close]

https://twitter.com/FilmBayona/status/1027631414261547008
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Aug 25, 2018, 08:04:11 PM
https://twitter.com/JurassicWorld/status/1033400255818002433
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Godzillakuj94 on Aug 25, 2018, 08:30:55 PM
After they crap out this 6th film they need to retire this series either for a long time it permanently.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Aug 26, 2018, 08:27:54 AM
Billions in profit - yeah that makes sense.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Sep 01, 2018, 04:38:08 AM
https://twitter.com/io9/status/1035264365954519040
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Sep 04, 2018, 01:50:33 AM
https://twitter.com/FilmBayona/status/1036298373517791234
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: FiorinaFury161 on Sep 04, 2018, 01:57:37 AM
Quote from: Crazy Shrimp on Sep 04, 2018, 01:50:33 AM
https://twitter.com/FilmBayona/status/1036298373517791234
Wow. That's a lotta bones :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Sep 04, 2018, 10:22:36 PM
And a lot.of sucking up on that twitter...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr.Turok on Sep 04, 2018, 10:55:13 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83uW9QUgPL4

So for those who play Evolution, not only are we getting a new update but new updates for the next 3 years! How many during the course of these years is the mystery. For now we got the following changes so far

Challenge Mode
This feature will put you on Isla Nublar with little starting money and starts by letting you choose the difficulty. There will be against mechanics, such as Hammond Foundation fees, contract cancellation penalties, and personal best completion times. There are also rewards, including achievements and new skins, for completing this mode.

More Sandbox Options
These settings can be accessed in the options menu at any time. The new options are meant to provide more freedom for players to play how they wish. The new options include:

Lifespan toggle and life extension,  dinosaurs now have life extended and the option of not dying from old age
Cash level toggle, so you can control how much is available to you
Various difficulty settings
Feeder Resupply toggle, to remove pesky ranger jobs
Power toggle, rendering the need and use of electricity obsolete

Highlighted Updates

There will be new lighting options for career islands that are unlocked once you reach 5 stars on each island
New contract types to add a few more challenges to the game
New viewing cameras such as view from Hotels, Viewing Platforms and Viewing Gallery
Korean and Italian language support
NEW DINOSAUR SIZES: T.rex and Ceratosaurus is scaled down to realistic size while Giganotosaurus, Spinosaurus gets the epic realistic size boost everyone wanted
Weather fixes can now enable actual weather in Isla Nublar


I know there is a few more but this is what I got in mind but yes I can't wait for more!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Sep 05, 2018, 12:43:56 AM
https://twitter.com/PrimeVideo/status/1037029092900532224
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Sep 05, 2018, 03:21:29 AM
Who cares about his speed... or how many bloody slides and rolls that lunatic does in this movie. It all feels like an artificial comicbook movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 07, 2018, 07:13:07 AM
The CG here is incredible!

https://twitter.com/ILMVFX/status/1037113667374919680
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Sep 07, 2018, 08:31:10 PM
Mwa everything is artificial... but it's more like a painting... which is nice too. There was some very good cgi in there must say. Too bad the movie itself stinks.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Sep 07, 2018, 08:38:05 PM
I thought the mix of effects on the Indoraptor was near flawless.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Sep 07, 2018, 09:23:14 PM
They used a lot of the Indoraptor animatronic head and arm on set.... so the lightening feels correct. Vast improvement compared to the last one. The script is so convoluted though... complete illogical events that don't make any sense and I never wanna see Pratt fly, duck, dive, hang, roll one more time. JP and TLW were very grounded action adventure movies that featured dinosaurs. Here they pose for the camera and roar like action heroes.

I think the movie would have benefited from more time on the island and less time at the Mansion.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Sep 07, 2018, 10:03:42 PM
Quote from: Xan21 on Sep 07, 2018, 08:31:10 PM
Mwa everything is artificial... but it's more like a painting... which is nice too. There was some very good cgi in there must say. Too bad the movie itself stinks.

I think it doesn't matter how good the current CG is, there must be some kind of uncanny valley that makes people hate it. That or the CG fatigue is a thing nowadays. I guess the key it's in the balance. :P
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Old One on Sep 07, 2018, 10:25:08 PM
I believe something has been lost in translation.

Otherwise the CGI of King Kong 2005 and LOTR wouldn't be superior to Jurassic World- but somehow it is. This isn't always the case, Mad Max Fury Road and Prometheus both have incredible, seamless CGI.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Sep 07, 2018, 11:03:12 PM
Bad CGI? sure  :P

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bL6hp8BKB24
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Sep 07, 2018, 11:22:45 PM
Quote from: The Old One on Sep 07, 2018, 10:25:08 PM
I believe something has been lost in translation.

Otherwise the CGI of King Kong 2005 and LOTR wouldn't be superior to Jurassic World- but somehow it is.

Just to play devils advocate here. In defense of everything not a Peter Jackson film. Those first 2 are Peter Jackson films. They'll need and they'll have the best CGI, no matter what.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Old One on Sep 07, 2018, 11:38:22 PM
Didn't read my post Crazy Shrimp?

I cited Fury Road as a recent example of excellent CGI, the best CGI or special effects for that matter- is when it goes unnoticed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Sep 08, 2018, 12:08:10 AM
The problem with cgi is that it's used for bloody anything these days... how much artificial lightening, surroundings etc does a movie need? It's gotten out of control.

And the cgi for king kong 2005 is amazingly bad... it looks like a cartoon


But jurassuck world has bigger problems, the acting is atrocious... shitty script. Insults its audience.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 12, 2018, 12:47:40 AM
Quote from: Xan21 on Sep 08, 2018, 12:08:10 AM
Insults its audience.

How so?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xan21 on Sep 12, 2018, 04:23:22 PM
By being so stupidly obvious... basically everything is spoonfed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Sep 13, 2018, 12:55:15 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 12, 2018, 12:47:40 AM
Quote from: Xan21 on Sep 08, 2018, 12:08:10 AM
Insults its audience.

How so?

BECASUE CGI SUCKSS!!11!1
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Sep 13, 2018, 01:26:58 AM
Jurassic world is a film series targeted for 12 year olds...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Sep 13, 2018, 02:06:02 AM
Quite.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Sep 13, 2018, 08:00:29 AM
I remember when I was 10 and finally understood the how and why of how the dinosaurs had managed to breed. Felt so proud of myself.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Sep 26, 2018, 01:22:59 AM
https://vimeo.com/291551811
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Oct 18, 2018, 07:11:58 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t38-ENJtcPM
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huntsman on Oct 19, 2018, 08:10:44 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Sep 13, 2018, 01:26:58 AM
Jurassic world is a film series targeted for 12 year olds...
Nothing is going to capture the magic, wonder, atmosphere and threat level of the original film. The 1993 era T-Rex still looks better than the 2018 era version. People crap all over TLW for various reasons, but I've always enjoyed it. And I find it makes the other sequels redundant with the themes it explored. An old guy in bed living in a mansion, dinosaurs being taken to the mainland, dinosaurs breaking free into the mainland and so forth. JW is an inferior remake of the original thats only point of difference is the park was open successfully for a number of years.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Oct 19, 2018, 08:58:04 AM
The cast of the Bohemian Rhapsody film were on TV this morning - I had no idea the guy playing John Deacon (Joseph Mazzello, aka Sledge from The Pacific) was the boy in the original Jurassic Park!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Oct 19, 2018, 07:34:07 PM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Oct 19, 2018, 08:58:04 AM
The cast of the Bohemian Rhapsody film were on TV this morning - I had no idea the guy playing John Deacon (Joseph Mazzello, aka Sledge from The Pacific) was the boy in the original Jurassic Park!

Yep, that was Sledge.

Quote from: Huntsman on Oct 19, 2018, 08:10:44 AM
JW is an inferior remake of the original thats only point of difference is the park was open successfully for a number of years.

As a standalone movie, the first JW wasn't all that bad. Nothing can ever be as good as the originals, but it was a fun enough ride. Fallen kingdom though, dear God. One of the worst films I've seen in years. Right down there with the pacific rim sequel. It's such a shame because both started with promising first entries, then they just nosedived into flaming oblivion.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Oct 19, 2018, 07:40:00 PM
I really feel like I saw a different film to everyone else. I didn't like Jurassic World but loved Fallen Kingdom.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huntsman on Oct 19, 2018, 11:20:46 PM
Quote from: Huggs on Oct 19, 2018, 07:34:07 PM
As a standalone movie, the first JW wasn't all that bad. Nothing can ever be as good as the originals, but it was a fun enough ride. Fallen kingdom though, dear God. One of the worst films I've seen in years. Right down there with the pacific rim sequel. It's such a shame because both started with promising first entries, then they just nosedived into flaming oblivion.
JW is okay, but it's bland and does nothing for me in terms of rewatchability. Fallen Kingsom had an okay concept but bungled it. The film became a haunted mansion TV movie devoid of the JP feeling.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Oct 20, 2018, 07:40:39 AM
I think it is about time they remake Jurassic Park but this time with feathered dinos. Makes real good use of all the fancy modern cgi.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Oct 20, 2018, 01:14:56 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Oct 20, 2018, 07:40:39 AM
I think it is about time they remake Jurassic Park but this time with feathered dinos. Makes real good use of all the fancy modern cgi.
Feathered dinos are weird and gross, and scientists are weird and gross for messing with dinosaurs and giving them weird and gross feathers after 'Jurassic Park' made dinosaurs look cool and awesome.  >:(

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Oct 20, 2018, 02:59:32 PM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Oct 20, 2018, 07:40:39 AM
I think it is about time they remake Jurassic Park but this time with feathered dinos.

They did, it's called Chicken Run.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naginata on Oct 20, 2018, 08:45:09 PM
^ At first I was like:  ???

Then I was like:  :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Oct 21, 2018, 01:13:43 AM
Now hold on for just one second and think about it... if you believe dinos didn't have feathers, wouldn't that put you into the creationist camp?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Naginata on Oct 21, 2018, 01:35:15 AM
... what?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Highland on Oct 21, 2018, 02:14:44 AM
What if instead of frog DNA then, they mixed the Dino's with a seagull. There's definite script possibilities with Dino's shitting all over your car and stealing your chips. Right out your hand.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Oct 21, 2018, 03:48:32 AM
Quote from: Highland on Oct 21, 2018, 02:14:44 AM
What if instead of frog DNA then, they mixed the Dino's with a seagull. There's definite script possibilities with Dino's shitting all over your car and stealing your chips. Right out your hand.

It's those damn tostitodons they were talking about in JW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Oct 21, 2018, 04:27:10 AM
Quote from: Highland on Oct 21, 2018, 02:14:44 AM
What if instead of frog DNA then, they mixed the Dino's with a seagull. There's definite script possibilities with Dino's shitting all over your car and stealing your chips. Right out your hand.
Seagulls are dinosaurs!

Wait, why didn't they use bird dna to fill in the holes anyways? Something isn't adding up here.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Oct 21, 2018, 04:43:42 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Oct 21, 2018, 04:27:10 AM
Quote from: Highland on Oct 21, 2018, 02:14:44 AM
What if instead of frog DNA then, they mixed the Dino's with a seagull. There's definite script possibilities with Dino's shitting all over your car and stealing your chips. Right out your hand.
Seagulls are dinosaurs!

Wait, why didn't they use bird dna to fill in the holes anyways? Something isn't adding up here.

I thought Hammond spared no expense?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Oct 21, 2018, 04:47:57 AM
Quote from: Huggs on Oct 21, 2018, 04:43:42 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Oct 21, 2018, 04:27:10 AM
Quote from: Highland on Oct 21, 2018, 02:14:44 AM
What if instead of frog DNA then, they mixed the Dino's with a seagull. There's definite script possibilities with Dino's shitting all over your car and stealing your chips. Right out your hand.
Seagulls are dinosaurs!

Wait, why didn't they use bird dna to fill in the holes anyways? Something isn't adding up here.

I thought Hammond spared no expense?
He was too cheap to put locks on the cars so the tourists wouldn't open the vehicle doors and run in the dinosaur pens.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Oct 21, 2018, 04:50:04 AM
And he got cheap on Newman.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Oct 21, 2018, 04:55:02 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Oct 21, 2018, 04:50:04 AM
And he got cheap on Newman.

Never go cheap on Newman.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Oct 21, 2018, 04:58:22 AM
Quote from: Huggs on Oct 21, 2018, 04:55:02 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Oct 21, 2018, 04:50:04 AM
And he got cheap on Newman.

Never go cheap on Newman.

(https://media.giphy.com/media/3o7TKr75ksPY62erO8/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Nov 12, 2018, 06:11:26 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Sn7a6XqcJw
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Dec 14, 2018, 01:42:20 AM
QuoteThe world I get excited about is the one where it's possible that a dinosaur might run out in front of your car on a foggy backroad, or invade your campground looking for food.

https://twitter.com/BDisgusting/status/1073317940387303424
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: irn on Dec 14, 2018, 09:00:27 PM
I'm really interested to see where they are going to go with the sixth installment. Nothing obvious seems to jump out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: whiterabbit on Dec 15, 2018, 03:22:38 AM
Dino-Human hybrids when peed on turn into gigantic gremlins.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Dec 15, 2018, 10:30:34 AM
Quote from: whiterabbit on Oct 21, 2018, 04:27:10 AM
Quote from: Highland on Oct 21, 2018, 02:14:44 AM
What if instead of frog DNA then, they mixed the Dino's with a seagull. There's definite script possibilities with Dino's shitting all over your car and stealing your chips. Right out your hand.
Seagulls are dinosaurs!

Wait, why didn't they use bird dna to fill in the holes anyways? Something isn't adding up here.

(https://media.giphy.com/media/W9CBaZNRCDBcY/giphy.gif)

"Clever girl"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huntsman on Jan 26, 2019, 10:43:22 AM
Gotta say, while I'm not the biggest JW universe fan, I think the opening scene of Fallen Kingdom is the best in the series. Rain at night time on Nublar, with lighting cracking overhead. The silhouette of the mosasaurus in the ocean, and the lightning illuminating the Rex are both gold. The ordeal with the ladder is creative, in the spirit of TLW's trailers dropping over the cliff. If the film maintained that level of atmosphere it would've been incredible.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: D88M on Jan 26, 2019, 05:56:51 PM
The direction by Bayona was pretty good, i liked how he tried to make the most out of the suspense each scene could have, is a good example of a good direction with a bad script, but teh script was so bad that it could not be disguised.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Jan 27, 2019, 02:56:23 AM
Quote from: D88M on Jan 26, 2019, 05:56:51 PM
The direction by Bayona was pretty good, i liked how he tried to make the most out of the suspense each scene could have, is a good example of a good direction with a bad script, but teh script was so bad that it could not be disguised.


Yeah he was really bogged down by that script. A positive for the next film is that Trevorrow has a new co-writer but you never know if he'll allow some fresh ideas to creep in.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: cloverfan98 on Jan 27, 2019, 04:37:26 AM
I really liked Fallen Kingdom but I get why people don't like it. I enjoyed the more horrific elements in the film especially when it came to the Indoraptor. Oddly enough O felt like this movie was the closest to Michael Crichton's writing since the first movie. It really remind me of NEXT in particular.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vermillion on Jan 27, 2019, 04:25:17 PM
The human cloning aspect was different and surprising. 
Malcolm was great.
The last shot of the Raptor and the Suburbs was a bit disturbing as it's going to snatch all those kids playing and having a good time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Jan 27, 2019, 10:15:09 PM
I'd have loved to get a Jurassic film that maintained the feel of that first 5 or ten minutes of F.K.

Something dark and scary with a storm rolling in. An R rated survival horror set on an Island of Dinos.

It's never going to happen though. Not as long as the family money reigns supreme.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: cloverfan98 on Jan 27, 2019, 10:49:23 PM
Quote from: Huggs on Jan 27, 2019, 10:15:09 PM
I'd have loved to get a Jurassic film that maintained the feel of that first 5 or ten minutes of F.K.

Something dark and scary with a storm rolling in. An R rated survival horror set on an Island of Dinos.

It's never going to happen though. Not as long as the family money reigns supreme.

Thats why we need a Dino Crisis movie. And a new game dang it!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vertigo on Jan 28, 2019, 01:52:09 AM
Quote from: Huggs on Jan 27, 2019, 10:15:09 PM
I'd have loved to get a Jurassic film that maintained the feel of that first 5 or ten minutes of F.K.

Something dark and scary with a storm rolling in. An R rated survival horror set on an Island of Dinos.

It's never going to happen though. Not as long as the family money reigns supreme.

That's still very do-able without an R-rating - good horror is mainly about tension and atmosphere, which has been a JP hallmark from the start, rather than showing you something nasty. Kids like scary movies, so long as they're not gory.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huntsman on Jan 28, 2019, 08:50:44 AM
Quote from: Huggs on Jan 27, 2019, 10:15:09 PM
I'd have loved to get a Jurassic film that maintained the feel of that first 5 or ten minutes of F.K.

Something dark and scary with a storm rolling in. An R rated survival horror set on an Island of Dinos.

It's never going to happen though. Not as long as the family money reigns supreme.
Agreed. FK's opening scene was spot on. It had tension building and horror with the mosasaurus leaping out of the water. Once the film reached the mansion I lost interest. It lacked the JP charm and atmosphere, and I just wasn't engaged.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Vermillion on Jan 28, 2019, 10:47:08 PM
Quote from: Huntsman on Jan 28, 2019, 08:50:44 AM
Quote from: Huggs on Jan 27, 2019, 10:15:09 PM
I'd have loved to get a Jurassic film that maintained the feel of that first 5 or ten minutes of F.K.

Something dark and scary with a storm rolling in. An R rated survival horror set on an Island of Dinos.

It's never going to happen though. Not as long as the family money reigns supreme.
Agreed. FK's opening scene was spot on. It had tension building and horror with the mosasaurus leaping out of the water. Once the film reached the mansion I lost interest. It lacked the JP charm and atmosphere, and I just wasn't engaged.
It started to become about business and ethics and trade routes..wait nevermind.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DarthJoker45 on Jun 04, 2019, 03:39:07 PM
A Jurassic World animated spin-off series is in the works for Netflix. Dream Works Animation will be creating the series.

https://comicbook.com/tv-shows/2019/06/04/jurassic-world-series-netflix-camp-cretaceous/

(https://media.comicbook.com/2019/06/jurassic-world-camp-cretaceous-1173723.jpeg)

https://twitter.com/JurassicWorld/status/1135924165704163328
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 11, 2019, 11:31:08 PM
https://twitter.com/JurassicWorld/status/1138514618622439424
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 17, 2019, 10:21:37 PM
(https://i0.wp.com/bloody-disgusting.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/john-hammond-death.jpg?zoom=1.1024999499320984&resize=700%2C906&ssl=1)

https://twitter.com/BDisgusting/status/1140719870851592192
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Baron Von Marlon on Jun 18, 2019, 12:09:09 AM
They should stop and switch to Dino-Riders!
A human and alien race at war, crash on a prehistoric planet and use dinosaurs to continue their war.

(https://www.geek.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/dinoriders-625x350.jpg)

(https://d13ezvd6yrslxm.cloudfront.net/wp/wp-content/images/TradeAd1.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 18, 2019, 12:23:24 AM
That's rad! bring me everything   8)

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi67.tinypic.com%2F2ypdn38.jpg&hash=15275f36b3ad8344fc880b7a100b4a13cad93129)

https://youtu.be/gr2iQ96em2w
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Baron Von Marlon on Jun 18, 2019, 01:05:33 AM
Not bad either. They could market it as Fast And The Dinosaurs or something.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Jun 19, 2019, 01:24:59 AM
Quote from: Baron Von Marlon on Jun 18, 2019, 01:05:33 AM
Not bad either. They could market it as Fast And The Dinosaurs or something.
Nah, that's Xenozoic Tales (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenozoic_Tales), aka "Cadillacs and Dinosaurs".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Jun 26, 2019, 06:54:35 AM
I'm actually working on my own series based on this kind of stuff.

Here is episode 1  8) : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sBjvaOOLFk&t
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Sep 10, 2019, 08:30:27 PM
(https://scontent-lga3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/70453898_2616236728421194_8930172632649695232_n.jpg?_nc_cat=1&_nc_oc=AQknJQdK4N5r-l02p1XubUWkUPBNbLH2ogzzDRN0ytHwnnMaKieXS2bKMfg-VMcCQcA&_nc_ht=scontent-lga3-1.xx&oh=6aeef3e932af72fabc10df55d62a1741&oe=5E11E4BC)

BATTLE AT BIG ROCK is an all-new short film directed by Colin Trevorrow, premiering on FX on Sunday, September 15.

The short takes place one year after the events of the last film in Big Rock National Park, where dinosaurs are now living in our world. The story follows a family of four whose encounter with these wild animals becomes a terrifying fight for survival.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Sep 10, 2019, 08:32:29 PM
Can't wait!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Sep 10, 2019, 08:47:52 PM
https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/1171509386595815427
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Sep 10, 2019, 08:48:40 PM
So, what are the odds that Owen and Claire will break up between movies again, only to get back together in JW3? :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Sep 10, 2019, 10:41:23 PM
The victorian-gothic looking scenes with the Indoraptor were my favorite parts of Fallen Kingdom so far.

(https://i.imgur.com/AZv9AZ4.jpg)

In fact, I wonder if you can make a good 2-hour horror movie with dinosaurs. Maybe if you play with the atmosphere (lighting, spooky setting, creepy music) and dinosaur design (some glowing eyes, a mutation here and there) it could work.

(https://i.imgur.com/2Svuzab.jpg)

Quote from: KiramidHead on Sep 10, 2019, 08:48:40 PM
So, what are the odds that Owen and Claire will break up between movies again, only to get back together in JW3? :laugh:

Friendzone finds a way!  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Sep 11, 2019, 04:52:22 PM
https://twitter.com/Collider/status/1171802608488476675
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Sep 13, 2019, 06:37:17 PM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Sep 10, 2019, 10:41:23 PM
The victorian-gothic looking scenes with the Indoraptor were my favorite parts of Fallen Kingdom so far.

https://i.imgur.com/AZv9AZ4.jpg

In fact, I wonder if you can make a good 2-hour horror movie with dinosaurs. Maybe if you play with the atmosphere (lighting, spooky setting, creepy music) and dinosaur design (some glowing eyes, a mutation here and there) it could work.

https://i.imgur.com/2Svuzab.jpg

Quote from: KiramidHead on Sep 10, 2019, 08:48:40 PM
So, what are the odds that Owen and Claire will break up between movies again, only to get back together in JW3? :laugh:

Friendzone finds a way!  ;D
What's the origin of the image in the bottom right? I recognise it but can't tell from where.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Sep 13, 2019, 06:57:02 PM
Quote from: Stitch on Sep 13, 2019, 06:37:17 PM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Sep 10, 2019, 10:41:23 PM
The victorian-gothic looking scenes with the Indoraptor were my favorite parts of Fallen Kingdom so far.

https://i.imgur.com/AZv9AZ4.jpg

In fact, I wonder if you can make a good 2-hour horror movie with dinosaurs. Maybe if you play with the atmosphere (lighting, spooky setting, creepy music) and dinosaur design (some glowing eyes, a mutation here and there) it could work.

https://i.imgur.com/2Svuzab.jpg

Quote from: KiramidHead on Sep 10, 2019, 08:48:40 PM
So, what are the odds that Owen and Claire will break up between movies again, only to get back together in JW3? :laugh:

Friendzone finds a way!  ;D
What's the origin of the image in the bottom right? I recognise it but can't tell from where.

It's a fan art: Yutyrannus by FredtheDinosaurman (https://www.deviantart.com/fredthedinosaurman/art/Yutyrannus-Killer-of-the-Batuyingzi-Forest-512432062).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Sep 15, 2019, 02:03:57 PM
https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/1173142128492503040
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Sep 15, 2019, 11:16:32 PM
https://twitter.com/FXNetworks/status/1172650359921106946

Almost time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Sep 16, 2019, 02:05:05 AM
I don't think it's online just yet, but I watched it live on FX and very much enjoyed it!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Sep 16, 2019, 05:37:15 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7kbVvpOGdQ
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Sep 16, 2019, 10:21:49 AM
Collin definitely looks like he was taking a bit of a page out of Bayona's directing style on this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Kurgan on Sep 16, 2019, 10:28:50 AM
Neat.

Still don't buy the step from a dozen dinosaurs escaping to dinosaurs are everywhere, we live in Jurassic World now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Evanus on Sep 16, 2019, 06:33:43 PM
That Lost World reprise at the end was awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Sep 16, 2019, 08:06:04 PM
Very strong Lost World vibes. I liked it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Sep 21, 2019, 07:08:08 PM
https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/1175472024577368065
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Sep 25, 2019, 05:02:11 AM
!!!
https://twitter.com/TheInSneider/status/1176723154024026114
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Sep 25, 2019, 05:10:27 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Sep 25, 2019, 05:02:11 AM
!!!
https://twitter.com/TheInSneider/status/1176723154024026114

Hopefully Sattler isn't just a tulpa.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Sep 25, 2019, 08:11:02 AM
Fantastic news.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master Chief on Sep 25, 2019, 03:06:15 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Sep 25, 2019, 05:02:11 AM
!!!
https://twitter.com/TheInSneider/status/1176723154024026114
I'm smiling under this helmet.  :)  Great news!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Evanus on Sep 25, 2019, 04:43:54 PM
Expected, but nice to have hard confirmation finally.

Really curious how they're going to handle Grant & Sattler, after JP3  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Sep 28, 2019, 05:27:28 PM
Quote from: The Kurgan on Sep 16, 2019, 10:28:50 AM
Still don't buy the step from a dozen dinosaurs escaping to dinosaurs are everywhere, we live in Jurassic World now.

It was more than a dozen, and besides we see from the montage at the end of Fallen Kingdom that it wasn't just those that directly escaped Lockwoods mansion. There were cases of embryos, and other dinosaurs were getting shipped/flown to other locations around the globe.

Also going back through this thread I found this...

Quote from: That Yellow Alien on Mar 25, 2008, 04:28:53 AM
But that is not the reason that scene was deleted. It was deleted because of pacing and redundancy.

If the writers wish to go back and confirm what Ludlow said is true, they can, or they don't have too, because it is deleted. We shall see, though most likely it will not be answered.

Looks like they did in JW. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: The Kurgan on Oct 02, 2019, 11:55:58 AM
Quote from: Alien³ on Sep 28, 2019, 05:27:28 PM
Quote from: The Kurgan on Sep 16, 2019, 10:28:50 AM
Still don't buy the step from a dozen dinosaurs escaping to dinosaurs are everywhere, we live in Jurassic World now.

It was more than a dozen, and besides we see from the montage at the end of Fallen Kingdom that it wasn't just those that directly escaped Lockwoods mansion. There were cases of embryos, and other dinosaurs were getting shipped/flown to other locations around the globe.


Maybe, it should still not be enough to establish a stable population. Even if humans let them live undisturbed.

But as they are all more or less very adaptable mutants, I guess there is some wiggle room for them to conquer ecosystems around the planet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Oct 02, 2019, 01:13:57 PM
I'm happy the big three are coming back, but I do wish Pete Postlethwaite was still with us and could make an appearance, too.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Oct 02, 2019, 04:39:27 PM
Quote from: The Kurgan on Oct 02, 2019, 11:55:58 AM
Maybe, it should still not be enough to establish a stable population. Even if humans let them live undisturbed.

I should have been more specific. I mean its not only the fact that a number of dinosaurs are on the loose but the technology to bring them back to life has also gone global.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Predwars24 on Oct 03, 2019, 01:56:44 PM
As much as I'm probably one of the very few people who liked Fallen Kingdom it seems letting the dinosaurs loose has caused this huge problem with people. I guess I don't ask millions of questions about the realism because the genetics behind even cloning the dinosaurs has proved to be impossible in real life, and the fact that if it happened in real life they'd just get locked up and contained elsewhere. The only thing I'm bothered by is the fact that JP3 confirms the pteranodons can just fly wherever they want unless caged and you'd think after Jurassic World they would've been everywhere before Fallen Kingdom even happened.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SuperiorIronman on Oct 03, 2019, 02:31:04 PM
Quote from: Predwars24 on Oct 03, 2019, 01:56:44 PM
As much as I'm probably one of the very few people who liked Fallen Kingdom it seems letting the dinosaurs loose has caused this huge problem with people. I guess I don't ask millions of questions about the realism because the genetics behind even cloning the dinosaurs has proved to be impossible in real life, and the fact that if it happened in real life they'd just get locked up and contained elsewhere. The only thing I'm bothered by is the fact that JP3 confirms the pteranodons can just fly wherever they want unless caged and you'd think after Jurassic World they would've been everywhere before Fallen Kingdom even happened.

Even before JP3, TLW establishes that there are free roaming pteranodon on Sorna. The JP3 versions near as we know are the only few to have actually left the island chain. We don't know why they didn't and the JP3 variant did, but by Fallen Kingdom the Jurassic World variant is the one that's out there, not the JP3 or TLW variant. Vic Hoskins and his men cleaned up the JP3 pteranodon and I guess TLW variant is either among the JW clones and we didn't see them, or they died off between films.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Oct 06, 2019, 01:15:56 AM
Amazing work of this artists  8)

(https://i.imgur.com/3HEMYuU.jpg)

https://www.instagram.com/p/B3DNGhJFA3n/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Oct 06, 2019, 02:31:00 AM
Throw me my Tek Bow.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: D88M on Oct 07, 2019, 10:53:49 PM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Oct 06, 2019, 01:15:56 AM
Amazing work of this artists  8)

(https://i.imgur.com/3HEMYuU.jpg)

https://www.instagram.com/p/B3DNGhJFA3n/

This is awesome, what is the name of the artists? The instagram link is not working for me :(
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Oct 08, 2019, 11:38:58 PM
Quote from: D88M on Oct 07, 2019, 10:53:49 PM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Oct 06, 2019, 01:15:56 AM
Amazing work of this artists  8)

(https://i.imgur.com/3HEMYuU.jpg)

https://www.instagram.com/p/B3DNGhJFA3n/

This is awesome, what is the name of the artists? The instagram link is not working for me :(

He is an artist from Argentina, so expect Spanish content. Anyway, his Facebook page:

(https://i.imgur.com/ejKHSnI.gif) DinoEsculturas (https://www.facebook.com/dinoesculturas/?hc_ref=ARTR3iR_TO_MZvR3vACEjSc0wwdDLA-dwxXjvoZGaHP7ZKZRlYDTi28MpgrNdtVe1Fc&fref=nf&__xts__%5B0%5D=68.ARAXzFPyAwGdzqLNNJs0ycsaOHj9rZD2opUcssRajJH5gycHlttdfL548R28NgERxE599Q4WAiS71yb6c9Gf4oKs5to-bCfhRmvk3hbS-NQIjnJICiXUrv__GVnyevPXdATKfFi7mjmUynVDsOuQSNNmtBiLAyt1NliS9_yX2Eyns1nAnhFlf1n7lzz-2uSPtshn-8RLSsCv63MiQanEB26B0rmv4_BwV2_zk3Yu8Z-UpxmV0TUuguCgRvWM9J4WWNEOnV1ApALHaAnWDTzGzXcEam6jSjA-I_gJr5r0E4HG3ntowLjJCWMDBD_VHqG4gfl-xTkAdiWgUD7335GSyxx3AQ&__tn__=kC-R)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Oct 16, 2019, 07:19:49 PM
https://www.facebook.com/TRXdinosaurs/videos/491801688037960/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Oct 18, 2019, 01:13:37 AM
https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/1184888005351350274
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Oct 20, 2019, 12:59:37 AM
https://twitter.com/ComicBook_Movie/status/1185707199470768138
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master Chief on Nov 07, 2019, 09:55:36 PM
Ugh.

https://twitter.com/collider/status/1192522681071099905
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Evanus on Nov 07, 2019, 10:00:13 PM
Huh, interesting. Don't really care for them, but they didn't annoy me that much either.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Nov 07, 2019, 10:41:28 PM
Oy Vey.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rankles75 on Nov 08, 2019, 09:04:47 AM
I'd prefer them to bring back Ariana Richards, personally. Those two added very little if anything to the last film.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Nov 09, 2019, 04:07:13 AM
That pair is very annoying. Even this kid form the original film is better.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2UQv2JUZoU

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr.Turok on Nov 09, 2019, 04:49:57 AM
Oh come on, they weren't that bad. Hell, perhaps some character development could make them better. I'm just not a fan of shooting a target till i'm sure of it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Nov 09, 2019, 05:11:02 AM
Just about anything and anybody that was part of JW2 is not what I'd like to see going forward.

Yes, even Owen and Claire.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 09, 2019, 05:24:37 AM
Hopefully Justice Smith brings Pikachu with him.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master Chief on Nov 13, 2019, 05:00:48 PM
Quote from: Huggs on Nov 09, 2019, 05:11:02 AM
Just about anything and anybody that was part of JW2 is not what I'd like to see going forward.

Yes, even Owen and Claire.
I agree.  I didn't mind Owen and Claire in the first JW, but I would really like them out as well.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Dec 03, 2019, 03:02:39 AM
https://twitter.com/vashikoo/status/1201362672354152449
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Lizardboy on Dec 25, 2019, 03:04:30 AM
https://twitter.com/JurassicOutpost/status/1205547738504536064 (https://twitter.com/JurassicOutpost/status/1205547738504536064)

https://twitter.com/JurassicOutpost/status/1205603368112197633 (https://twitter.com/JurassicOutpost/status/1205603368112197633)

Looks like a Raptor but not a normal one;

(https://jurassicoutpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/78629463_2526255004311043_1433706245713297408_n.jpg)

Maybe they are adapting the JP4 John Sayles script Excavaraptors ::)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ELtX0MYXsAANkIS?format=jpg&name=900x900)



Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jan 02, 2020, 04:22:17 AM
(https://media.giphy.com/media/U8XZGbSnEmpf42eKPb/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Jan 15, 2020, 01:47:22 AM
These are cool -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rd_sxttXCg8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZj6_NGlNDI
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Feb 02, 2020, 01:17:51 AM
https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/1223339453994938368
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Feb 02, 2020, 04:40:35 AM
The other day I found some edited photos and some nice fan arts, which lead me to believe there is nothing wrong with feathered dinosaurs in the JP franchise.

(https://i.imgur.com/dlSfYSG.jpg)

(https://i.imgur.com/EHcOb4U.jpg)

(https://i.imgur.com/X65qrv9.jpg)

(https://i.imgur.com/ssGd4z0.jpg)

(https://i.imgur.com/UxJw6m3.jpg)

(https://i.imgur.com/j0YjAMa.jpg)

(https://i.imgur.com/jsmFCXE.jpg)

(https://i.imgur.com/b1hPW4P.jpg)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Feb 02, 2020, 10:32:17 AM
However factually accurate, it still looks kinda silly to me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Drukathi on Feb 02, 2020, 01:30:00 PM
It's looks silly because they look furry rather than feathered.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Feb 02, 2020, 02:35:24 PM
Feathered dinosaurs are bad and wrong, and anyone who likes them will be THE FIRST ONES UP AGAINST THE WALL WHEN THE REVOLUTION STARTS.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Feb 02, 2020, 03:28:42 PM
I know this may upset people, but that's how the canon goes. :) Well, real-life canon actually.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: irn on Feb 02, 2020, 03:44:57 PM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Feb 02, 2020, 04:40:35 AM
The other day I found some edited photos and some nice fan arts, which lead me to believe there is nothing wrong with feathered dinosaurs in the JP franchise.

(https://i.imgur.com/dlSfYSG.jpg)

(https://i.imgur.com/EHcOb4U.jpg)

(https://i.imgur.com/X65qrv9.jpg)

(https://i.imgur.com/ssGd4z0.jpg)

(https://i.imgur.com/UxJw6m3.jpg)

(https://i.imgur.com/j0YjAMa.jpg)

(https://i.imgur.com/jsmFCXE.jpg)

https://i.imgur.com/b1hPW4P.jpg

I might be wrong but I don't think tyrannosaurus had feathers due to the size of it and the likelihood of overheating. I also believe there's been skin impressions found in rock that showed scales.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Feb 03, 2020, 08:29:43 PM
This is lovely -
(https://cdna.artstation.com/p/assets/images/images/022/892/746/large/frederic-wierum-asset.jpg?1577128222)
https://www.artstation.com/fredthedinosaurman
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Feb 14, 2020, 12:08:14 AM
https://twitter.com/THR/status/1228093024368054274
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Feb 14, 2020, 09:43:25 AM
Always happy to see Johnson getting work.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr.Turok on Feb 15, 2020, 04:31:12 AM
I'm glad that these guys ain't forgotten, can't wait to see what their characters will do in this new chapter of JW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Evanus on Feb 15, 2020, 01:38:30 PM
Quote from: Gilfryd on Feb 03, 2020, 08:29:43 PM
This is lovely -
(https://cdna.artstation.com/p/assets/images/images/022/892/746/large/frederic-wierum-asset.jpg?1577128222)
https://www.artstation.com/fredthedinosaurman
That's awesome, the buck is probably my favorite Rex from the series.

Quote from: ace3g on Feb 14, 2020, 12:08:14 AM
https://twitter.com/THR/status/1228093024368054274
Glad they're back, just hope the movie won't be overstuffed..
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Feb 19, 2020, 05:44:48 PM
https://twitter.com/DEADLINE/status/1229904003036663809?s
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Feb 20, 2020, 12:09:08 AM
https://twitter.com/yvrshoots/status/1230251184469856256

https://twitter.com/amblin/status/1230297182147727362
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Feb 21, 2020, 12:22:44 AM
According to Chris Pratt, Jurassic World 3 it going to feel like  Avengers: Endgame (at 02:04 mark).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t71GJH2F46A
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Feb 21, 2020, 12:26:54 AM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Feb 21, 2020, 12:22:44 AM
According to Chris Pratt, Jurassic World 3 it going to feel like  Avengers: Endgame (at 02:04 mark).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t71GJH2F46A

Is he going to screw up the plan in this one if Clair gets killed?

Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Feb 14, 2020, 09:43:25 AM
Always happy to see Johnson getting work.

A phrase indeed heard often on February 14th.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Feb 21, 2020, 01:23:24 AM
Quote from: Huggs on Feb 21, 2020, 12:26:54 AM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Feb 21, 2020, 12:22:44 AM
According to Chris Pratt, Jurassic World 3 it going to feel like  Avengers: Endgame (at 02:04 mark).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t71GJH2F46A

Is he going to screw up the plan in this one if Clair gets killed?

He is going to screw up the plan if Blue gets killed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Feb 21, 2020, 01:29:16 AM
If only they could snap the last movie out of existence.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Feb 21, 2020, 03:41:54 AM
I predict
Spoiler
The classic T. rex dies, but Blue lives to give birth via parthenogenesis or something.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Evanus on Feb 21, 2020, 01:46:37 PM
Apparently Colin said they can't kill of any T-rex anymore, probably because of JP3  :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Feb 24, 2020, 03:39:47 PM
(https://i.imgur.com/b7Q1lbS.jpg)

https://twitter.com/MazzelloJoe/status/1231662101980008450?s
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rankles75 on Feb 24, 2020, 11:22:12 PM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Feb 24, 2020, 03:39:47 PM
(https://i.imgur.com/b7Q1lbS.jpg)

https://twitter.com/MazzelloJoe/status/1231662101980008450?s

Only if they bring back Ariana Richards...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 25, 2020, 07:48:50 PM
https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/1232390966927122432

Jurassic World: Dominion
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 26, 2020, 10:52:04 PM
Love the title! Not what I was expecting but I think it fits in nicely.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Feb 26, 2020, 11:19:28 PM
It's a tad hammy.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Feb 27, 2020, 06:27:16 PM
Quote from: Huggs on Feb 26, 2020, 11:19:28 PM
It's a tad hammy.

That could be said for the entire franchise.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Feb 28, 2020, 10:05:01 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Feb 27, 2020, 06:27:16 PM
Quote from: Huggs on Feb 26, 2020, 11:19:28 PM
It's a tad hammy.

That could be said for the entire franchise.
You're thinking of Jurassic Pork.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Feb 28, 2020, 11:36:23 PM
Quote from: Stitch on Feb 28, 2020, 10:05:01 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Feb 27, 2020, 06:27:16 PM
Quote from: Huggs on Feb 26, 2020, 11:19:28 PM
It's a tad hammy.

That could be said for the entire franchise.
You're thinking of Jurassic Pork.

The one filmed deep within the San Fernando Valley?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on Mar 01, 2020, 09:27:18 AM
Quote from: Stitch on Feb 28, 2020, 10:05:01 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on Feb 27, 2020, 06:27:16 PM
Quote from: Huggs on Feb 26, 2020, 11:19:28 PM
It's a tad hammy.

That could be said for the entire franchise.
You're thinking of Jurassic Pork.

(https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Ftrekcore.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F09%2Friker-yeahh.gif&f=1&nofb=1)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Mar 12, 2020, 07:22:32 PM
(https://i.imgur.com/MQl7h5j.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Evanus on Mar 12, 2020, 07:27:51 PM
Love the classic colors.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Mar 12, 2020, 11:22:52 PM
Jurassic Domination
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Mar 14, 2020, 04:33:46 AM
https://twitter.com/sportrelief/status/1238461539990024192
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gr33n M4n on Mar 14, 2020, 04:50:34 AM
I like how the poster pays homage to the original film.

Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Mar 12, 2020, 07:22:32 PM
(https://i.imgur.com/MQl7h5j.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Mar 14, 2020, 11:57:32 PM
So do I.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Ryu on Mar 17, 2020, 10:00:55 PM
https://twitter.com/THEJurassicMan/status/1229477342726082561 (https://twitter.com/THEJurassicMan/status/1229477342726082561)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gr33n M4n on Mar 18, 2020, 04:20:14 AM
Animatronics look more realistic than cgi.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Mar 23, 2020, 12:39:48 AM
Jurassic World Domination should have this level of action.

(https://i.imgur.com/x88ReKX.jpg)
(https://i.imgur.com/ax7P5SQ.jpg)
(https://i.imgur.com/uuTiRgz.jpg)
(https://i.imgur.com/IxU0zbs.jpg)
(https://i.imgur.com/5fdc2Ki.jpg)
(https://i.imgur.com/aG3lG3V.jpg)
(https://i.imgur.com/6yQOFxx.jpg)
(https://i.imgur.com/8FfB8nR.jpg)
(https://i.imgur.com/D2oUPeU.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Mar 23, 2020, 12:46:38 AM
I wish Tim Burton had done a movie of that after Mars Attacks.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: HuDaFuK on Mar 23, 2020, 09:09:16 AM
:laugh:

Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Mar 23, 2020, 12:39:48 AMhttps://i.imgur.com/aG3lG3V.jpg

Nicolas Cage has put on some weight.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Mar 23, 2020, 06:42:32 PM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Mar 23, 2020, 12:39:48 AM
Jurassic World Domination should have this level of action.

(https://i.imgur.com/x88ReKX.jpg)
(https://i.imgur.com/ax7P5SQ.jpg)
https://i.imgur.com/uuTiRgz.jpg
(https://i.imgur.com/IxU0zbs.jpg)
https://i.imgur.com/5fdc2Ki.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/aG3lG3V.jpg
(https://i.imgur.com/6yQOFxx.jpg)
(https://i.imgur.com/8FfB8nR.jpg)
(https://i.imgur.com/D2oUPeU.jpg)

Way the world is going we might see this next month.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Mar 29, 2020, 08:40:22 PM
https://twitter.com/DailyMailCeleb/status/1244016023159922689
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Mar 30, 2020, 01:08:07 AM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Mar 23, 2020, 09:09:16 AM
:laugh:

Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Mar 23, 2020, 12:39:48 AMhttps://i.imgur.com/aG3lG3V.jpg

Nicolas Cage has put on some weight.

Starring Nicolas Cage and Nicolas Cage, as his own thighs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Mar 30, 2020, 01:22:53 AM
Quote from: Huggs on Mar 30, 2020, 01:08:07 AM
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Mar 23, 2020, 09:09:16 AM
:laugh:

Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Mar 23, 2020, 12:39:48 AMhttps://i.imgur.com/aG3lG3V.jpg

Nicolas Cage has put on some weight.

Starring Nicolas Cage and Nicolas Cage, as his own thighs.

What if we're all him in a way ??? Every single man, woman or dog on the entire world. Planet Cage or Cage Prime if you prefer. The dinosaurs might be extinct cos the Cagemorphs invaded Earth 65 millions years ago  :-X :-X :-X
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Mar 30, 2020, 01:27:14 AM
                        THE CAGE

(https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/51b3dc8ee4b051b96ceb10de/1372480419332-1K7BXA14HNLILNSMNVRG/Thethingposter6192012.jpeg?content-type=image%2Fjpeg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Mar 30, 2020, 06:00:30 AM
lol.. good one!  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Apr 01, 2020, 03:43:22 PM
https://www.instagram.com/p/B-ZvQ_0l7ZB/?igshid=10xgf1m9gh3y
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 18, 2020, 09:44:42 PM
https://twitter.com/LeDoctor/status/1251627434048286720
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Apr 18, 2020, 10:33:23 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Apr 18, 2020, 09:44:42 PM
https://twitter.com/LeDoctor/status/1251627434048286720

Cool!  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 19, 2020, 06:28:56 PM
https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/1251791112014114976
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Apr 22, 2020, 04:44:45 PM
https://twitter.com/GamesRadar/status/1252662162474106881?s
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 22, 2020, 05:59:07 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Apr 19, 2020, 06:28:56 PM
https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/1251791112014114976

https://twitter.com/ace3g/status/1252630680690929664
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Apr 22, 2020, 06:52:25 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Apr 22, 2020, 05:59:07 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Apr 19, 2020, 06:28:56 PM
https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/1251791112014114976

https://twitter.com/ace3g/status/1252630680690929664

^Perfect for the  feathers  :-X :-X :-X

(https://i.imgur.com/pPaZBTy.jpg)

(https://i.imgur.com/ysb5xWM.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 23, 2020, 02:02:34 AM
https://twitter.com/JurassicWorld/status/1253141541834485765
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 28, 2020, 07:28:06 PM
https://twitter.com/vfxblog/status/1255164878119198720

RIP

https://twitter.com/Variety/status/1255389082148130818





https://twitter.com/prattprattpratt/status/1255656339960811520
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 07, 2020, 08:05:10 PM
https://twitter.com/BRUTALPosters/status/1258412599420600321
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on May 08, 2020, 03:40:46 PM
I'm surprised there hasn't been a good Triceratops/Tyrannosaurus confrontation in these movies yet.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 19, 2020, 04:17:15 PM
https://twitter.com/JurassicWorld/status/1262775698776702976
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on May 22, 2020, 03:28:55 AM
From the master Drew Struzan -
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on May 23, 2020, 10:18:57 PM
Quote from: Frank Marshall via Collider"It's the start of a new era," he said, after an effusive "no" when asked if Jurassic World 3 was being envisioned as an endpoint. "The dinosaurs are now on the mainland amongst us, and they will be for quite some time, I hope" he added, alluding to future stories set in this "new normal" world where humans have to share the globe alongside dinosaurs.

https://twitter.com/Collider/status/1264224574524227584
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on May 29, 2020, 03:49:36 PM
Quote from: Sam Neill via The GuardianThe actor and his latest team of Jurassic co-stars were due to start filming in England on Jurassic World III this month, until the pandemic struck, but he said there is still hope that some work can resume in July.

"I should be going into Pinewood at 6am. All the sets are there, waiting," said Neill, adding that Britain holds a big place in his heart, and that he is yearning to eat out again in London after seeing a stage show in the West End.

https://twitter.com/guardian/status/1264198577695399936
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 11, 2020, 04:08:59 PM
https://twitter.com/OnlyFilmMedia/status/1270952856531742722
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 15, 2020, 08:04:11 PM
https://twitter.com/slashfilm/status/1272582423021105154
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 23, 2020, 07:41:18 PM
Quote from: Bryce Dallas Howard via Collider"The script was awesome," Howard said, "it was so exhilarating reading it – my husband got to read it too, Colin [Trevorrow] was like, 'Yeah, you and Seth can read it,' and we were like, just the whole time, kinda flipping out. Which is like, that was exhilarating because we are all so excited to come back together."

https://twitter.com/comingsoonnet/status/1275083844891357187



Every father's day is better with dinosaurs.  8)

Quote from: DeadlineSteven Spielberg's 1993 movie Jurassic Park was No. 1 for the fourth time in its release history this past weekend as movie theaters tried to have a semblance during the COVID-19 pandemic over what is typically a big moviegoing weekend, Father's Day.

https://twitter.com/DEADLINE/status/1275229469985234944
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: aliens13 on Jun 23, 2020, 07:46:36 PM
After JWFK I don't expect nothing about Dominion... Battle at Big Rock was decent enough but I keep my expectations low for this one
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 23, 2020, 08:31:12 PM
I actually like Fallen Kingdom more than the first JW. It has problems, lots of them, but I had fun with the horror movie structure in the second half and it has much, much better cinematography.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 23, 2020, 10:19:24 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 23, 2020, 08:31:12 PM
I actually like Fallen Kingdom more than the first JW. It has problems, lots of them, but I had fun with the horror movie structure in the second half and it has much, much better cinematography.

Yeah that part was fine. It was like a gothic horror movie at times.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Jun 23, 2020, 10:39:10 PM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 23, 2020, 10:19:24 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 23, 2020, 08:31:12 PM
I actually like Fallen Kingdom more than the first JW. It has problems, lots of them, but I had fun with the horror movie structure in the second half and it has much, much better cinematography.

Yeah that part was fine. It was like a gothic horror movie at times.
Yep. First half is very Lost World, and second half is Dino Crisis. I thought it was way better than JW.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Jun 24, 2020, 12:18:25 AM
Opening to Fallen Kingdom is some of the best JP stuff since the first one.

Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 23, 2020, 07:41:18 PMEvery father's day is better with dinosaurs.  8)

Quote from: DeadlineSteven Spielberg's 1993 movie Jurassic Park was No. 1 for the fourth time in its release history this past weekend as movie theaters tried to have a semblance during the COVID-19 pandemic over what is typically a big moviegoing weekend, Father's Day.

https://twitter.com/DEADLINE/status/1275229469985234944

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 24, 2020, 12:29:22 AM
Fallen Kingdom is fresh and I find the human cloning subplot interesting. It's like when you reimagine old tropes and add some new DNA to it to create something else; ala Arrival. Or the Indominus Rex lol

The movie itself is a nice hybrid of cool things.  8)

Quote from: Gilfryd on Jun 24, 2020, 12:18:25 AM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 23, 2020, 07:41:18 PMEvery father's day is better with dinosaurs.  8)

Quote from: DeadlineSteven Spielberg's 1993 movie Jurassic Park was No. 1 for the fourth time in its release history this past weekend as movie theaters tried to have a semblance during the COVID-19 pandemic over what is typically a big moviegoing weekend, Father's Day.

https://twitter.com/DEADLINE/status/1275229469985234944

https://i.gifer.com/1sOe.gif

JP is a national treasure.  :)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: aliens13 on Jun 24, 2020, 12:49:37 AM
Quote from: Gilfryd on Jun 24, 2020, 12:18:25 AM
Opening to Fallen Kingdom is some of the best JP stuff since the first one.

Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 23, 2020, 07:41:18 PMEvery father's day is better with dinosaurs.  8)

Quote from: DeadlineSteven Spielberg's 1993 movie Jurassic Park was No. 1 for the fourth time in its release history this past weekend as movie theaters tried to have a semblance during the COVID-19 pandemic over what is typically a big moviegoing weekend, Father's Day.

https://twitter.com/DEADLINE/status/1275229469985234944

https://i.gifer.com/1sOe.gif

The opening?? You mean that part FULL of errors?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Jun 24, 2020, 01:21:19 AM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 24, 2020, 12:29:22 AM
Fallen Kingdom is fresh and I find the human cloning subplot interesting.

Gonna have to disagree with you there. I found that bit a step too far. I thought it was unnecessary, and went nowhere. The big thing about human cloning was empathy for the cloned dinosaurs. That could just as easily have been done by... Just being empathetic towards the dying animals?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 25, 2020, 04:15:45 AM
Quote from: Stitch on Jun 24, 2020, 01:21:19 AM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 24, 2020, 12:29:22 AM
Fallen Kingdom is fresh and I find the human cloning subplot interesting.

Gonna have to disagree with you there. I found that bit a step too far. I thought it was unnecessary, and went nowhere. The big thing about human cloning was empathy for the cloned dinosaurs. That could just as easily have been done by... Just being empathetic towards the dying animals?

Cos in order to feel real empathy, humans have to put on the shoes of the dinosaurs. Clearly Dying Animals is not enough for filmmakers. They needed human drama and tears. I understand that the idea is out of place. But I appreciate the intention to do something different.

Edit: Dinosaurs didn't wear shoes. I don't use them inside my house either. You know ... all that pandemic stuff.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 25, 2020, 04:18:36 AM
The cloned human element does feel very Crichton too. Perhaps not strictly Jurassic Park, but in general, very Crichton.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Jun 25, 2020, 12:46:22 PM
Quote from: aliens13 on Jun 24, 2020, 12:49:37 AMThe opening?? You mean that part FULL of errors?

Uh the rainy opening sequence where they get the Indominus DNA - Via Wiki -
Spoiler
Shortly after the events of Jurassic World in 2015, a small mercenary team arrives on the abandoned Isla Nublar to collect DNA from the Indominus rex remains lying on the bottom of the park's lagoon. After collecting a bone, the team's survivors escape the island following attacks by the Mosasaurus and the Tyrannosaurus rex, but they accidentally release the former into the ocean.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: aliens13 on Jun 25, 2020, 01:04:00 PM
Quote from: Gilfryd on Jun 25, 2020, 12:46:22 PM
Quote from: aliens13 on Jun 24, 2020, 12:49:37 AMThe opening?? You mean that part FULL of errors?

Uh the rainy opening sequence where they get the Indominus DNA - Via Wiki -
Spoiler
Shortly after the events of Jurassic World in 2015, a small mercenary team arrives on the abandoned Isla Nublar to collect DNA from the Indominus rex remains lying on the bottom of the park's lagoon. After collecting a bone, the team's survivors escape the island following attacks by the Mosasaurus and the Tyrannosaurus rex, but they accidentally release the former into the ocean.
[close]

Into the ocean.. despise that in the first JW movie the Mosasaur it was in a lagoon not connected into the ocean
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 25, 2020, 07:06:18 PM
!!!!


https://twitter.com/Collider/status/1276220907065925632
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Evanus on Jun 25, 2020, 08:02:55 PM
(https://thumbs.gfycat.com/MeekRightGarpike-size_restricted.gif)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 25, 2020, 08:04:39 PM
More InGen/BiosSyn corporate espionage elements please.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: irn on Jun 25, 2020, 08:32:25 PM
It's only took 27 years and five sequels for him to reappear!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Jun 25, 2020, 09:26:27 PM
Original actor Cameron Thor is a sex offender so maybe that's why.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Jun 25, 2020, 11:47:36 PM
Quote from: irn on Jun 25, 2020, 08:32:25 PM
It's only took 27 years and five sequels for him to reappear!

That's cause "nobody cares".
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: irn on Jun 25, 2020, 11:47:50 PM
Quote from: Gilfryd on Jun 25, 2020, 09:26:27 PM
Original actor Cameron Thor is a sex offender so maybe that's why.

I didn't realise that until I read the article. I figured the Campbell Scott was the guy from the original. Still, it's good to have the connection to this scene in the new one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 26, 2020, 03:19:47 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Jun 25, 2020, 07:06:18 PM
!!!!


https://twitter.com/Collider/status/1276220907065925632

Uh uh uh! You didn't say the magic word! Uh uh uh! Uh uh uh!  ;D

They should clone Dennis Nedry to bring him back and then sell Sideshow figures that are more expensive. 

Don't get cheap on me Universal!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Jun 26, 2020, 10:49:17 PM
The Lost Programmer: Jurassic Nedry

"Someone has Survived"

Spoiler
Post credits scene featuring a one armed Samuel L. Jackson
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rankles75 on Jun 26, 2020, 11:15:17 PM
Well, technically we never saw Nedry die. He might have just been slightly mauled...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Jun 27, 2020, 12:34:18 AM
He killed "Jim Hoppa"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: irn on Jun 27, 2020, 03:24:54 AM
Quote from: Rankles75 on Jun 26, 2020, 11:15:17 PM
Well, technically we never saw Nedry die. He might have just been slightly mauled...

Or Sammy J either. I mean he lost an entire arm, but he might have been savvy in applying tourniquets. It would be quite fun to see him return as a really bitter veteran of dinosaur encounters.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Jun 27, 2020, 10:52:45 AM
#MuldoonLives
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jun 27, 2020, 12:39:36 PM
No no no. All of these characters died.

Spoiler
They're all getting cloned, though.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xiggz456 on Jun 27, 2020, 01:14:36 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Jun 27, 2020, 10:52:45 AM
#MuldoonLives

Haha in the 90's Topps comic series sequel (pre-Lost World) Muldoon did indeed live!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rankles75 on Jun 27, 2020, 01:35:13 PM
Quote from: Xiggz456 on Jun 27, 2020, 01:14:36 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Jun 27, 2020, 10:52:45 AM
#MuldoonLives

Haha in the 90's Topps comic series sequel (pre-Lost World) Muldoon did indeed live!

How the heck did they explain that? 😂
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 28, 2020, 05:12:03 PM
https://twitter.com/GeekTyrant/status/1277281863611097089
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Jun 28, 2020, 08:57:25 PM
Quote from: Rankles75 on Jun 27, 2020, 01:35:13 PM
Quote from: Xiggz456 on Jun 27, 2020, 01:14:36 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Jun 27, 2020, 10:52:45 AM
#MuldoonLives

Haha in the 90's Topps comic series sequel (pre-Lost World) Muldoon did indeed live!

How the heck did they explain that? 😂

I think they went with the raptors having gotten so used to him that the attack we saw in JP were just them playing with him.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 28, 2020, 10:08:35 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Jun 28, 2020, 08:57:25 PM
Quote from: Rankles75 on Jun 27, 2020, 01:35:13 PM
Quote from: Xiggz456 on Jun 27, 2020, 01:14:36 PM
Quote from: Shasvre on Jun 27, 2020, 10:52:45 AM
#MuldoonLives

Haha in the 90's Topps comic series sequel (pre-Lost World) Muldoon did indeed live!

How the heck did they explain that? 😂

I think they went with the raptors having gotten so used to him that the attack we saw in JP were just them playing with him.

Makes sense...ala Owen & Blue's chemistry.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jul 01, 2020, 04:35:52 PM
Quote from: Sam Neill via Yahoo Movies"We're all the way through the film, Jeff [Goldblum], and me, and Laura [Dern]" Neill tells Yahoo Movies UK while promoting his new film Ride Like A Girl , out this week on PVOD, but he admits he "probably won't be running quite as fast as I was 27 years ago!"

https://twitter.com/YahooMoviesUK/status/1278319665945534470
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Jul 03, 2020, 08:29:50 PM
Quote from: aliens13 on Jun 25, 2020, 01:04:00 PMInto the ocean.. despise that in the first JW movie the Mosasaur it was in a lagoon not connected into the ocean

Who cares. Remember the ship carrying the male rex that crashes for no reason in Lost World? With everyone onboard dead? That's a bigger goof.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jul 16, 2020, 07:53:09 PM
https://twitter.com/BryceDHoward/status/1283836643548389381
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jul 28, 2020, 04:03:38 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKJwbsx1BSc
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Aug 02, 2020, 03:50:39 PM
https://twitter.com/TwoPaddocks/status/1289850390230360064
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Aug 04, 2020, 05:51:21 PM
https://twitter.com/TwoPaddocks/status/1290590100921831424

https://twitter.com/TwoPaddocks/status/1290963112460341249
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Aug 13, 2020, 02:54:58 PM
(https://images2.imgbox.com/88/e7/nzBJzIcZ_o.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Aug 13, 2020, 04:34:45 PM
'We Are the Guinea Pigs': Hollywood Restarts Its Blockbuster Machine

"Jurassic World: Dominion," filming in England, is a chance for the movie industry to see if it can move past the financial woes caused by the pandemic.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/13/business/media/coronavirus-jurassic-world-dominion.html

(https://static01.nyt.com/images/2020/08/07/business/00virus-hollywood-2/00virus-hollywood-2-superJumbo.jpg?quality=90&auto=webp)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: irn on Aug 14, 2020, 11:59:08 AM
Quote from: Shasvre on Aug 13, 2020, 02:54:58 PM
(https://images2.imgbox.com/88/e7/nzBJzIcZ_o.jpg)

Good to see they're not using CGI jungle/forest.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Evanus on Aug 14, 2020, 05:45:21 PM
Yeah, looks great. I just hope they don't go too far with the grading, making it all look artificial anyway. Fallen Kingdom's Nublar sequences suffered from this a bit imo.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: irn on Aug 14, 2020, 07:32:45 PM
Quote from: Evanus on Aug 14, 2020, 05:45:21 PM
Yeah, looks great. I just hope they don't go too far with the grading, making it all look artificial anyway. Fallen Kingdom's Nublar sequences suffered from this a bit imo.

I agree. Hopefully they don't apply too much colour grading in this. It's one of my biggest grips with JW and FK since it made the island look like studio sets instead of a real place.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Sep 01, 2020, 07:00:04 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRTIrK3Kku8
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Sep 04, 2020, 11:12:45 PM
Quote from: Gilfryd on Jul 03, 2020, 08:29:50 PM
Quote from: aliens13 on Jun 25, 2020, 01:04:00 PMInto the ocean.. despise that in the first JW movie the Mosasaur it was in a lagoon not connected into the ocean

Who cares. Remember the ship carrying the male rex that crashes for no reason in Lost World? With everyone onboard dead? EThat's a bigger goof.

You know what? Since almost anything is possible, I would welcome an action scene with an unexpected twist. Everyone is running away from the T. Rex & Raptors; the meat eater ones. And suddenly, there is a heavenly landscape. The sun is shining, there are rainbows in the skies and pretty plants being eaten by vegetarian dinosaurs. The feeling of the characters is ~ don't worry, they won't hurt you. We're already safe ~

Fatal mistake! 😈

One of the plant eaters has turned to the dark side of the meat and is starting to kill everyone, even the T. Rex.

(https://i.ibb.co/DWmbDgf/gif.gif)

The moral of the story is ... ~ be vegan ~
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Sep 07, 2020, 02:46:43 PM
https://twitter.com/TwoPaddocks/status/1302945816521383938
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Shasvre on Sep 12, 2020, 06:44:10 PM
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Sep 22, 2020, 09:44:00 PM
https://twitter.com/JurassicWorld/status/1308445935442092032
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr.Turok on Sep 23, 2020, 04:27:29 AM
This is all super adorable, I just love seeing them having a fun time with each other not only in film but also out of the camera. I'm just a softy for wholesome interaction.

As for Jurassic World: Camp Cretaceous, for a series for a younger audience, I love how even though they don't explicitly show humans being torn apart via dinosaur claws/teeth, they get close as the ratings allow them to be and that crisp audio of flesh and bone being torn apart fills in what you already know and more. The first few minutes of the first episode really surprised me that even though the person died over the grassy hill, you can tell pretty much tell from the audio that the poor man is being eaten alive.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Sep 27, 2020, 10:04:22 PM
Ind-o-arm -
(https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/120189309_1232658957120902_9119440043050772404_n.jpg?_nc_cat=110&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=lTg7RBTTNp0AX-nNz4i&_nc_ht=scontent-atl3-1.xx&oh=255f40ef19f7775390401077e18d48ae&oe=5F984B8A)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Oct 02, 2020, 05:25:47 PM
https://www.instagram.com/p/CF1K3GHjkRq/?igshid=1olxh35w8oxvl
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Evanus on Oct 02, 2020, 05:29:38 PM
Even if the movie turns out to be disappointing, these clips make it all worth it.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Oct 06, 2020, 10:41:40 PM
https://twitter.com/JurassicWorld/status/1313601673256792064

https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/1313604895472312321

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EjrTguwVcAArMqF?format=jpg&name=900x900)

https://twitter.com/JurassicWorld/status/1313911259889192960
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DarthJoker45 on Oct 09, 2020, 01:25:19 PM
https://twitter.com/JurassicWorld/status/1314551194346496001
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Oct 09, 2020, 02:45:10 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsIQZvVCWeg

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Oct 23, 2020, 05:21:22 PM
https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/1319665967853637633
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Nov 01, 2020, 02:43:03 AM
Dinosaurs would of had no chance.

https://twitter.com/OnlyFilmMedia/status/1322697258064875527

RIP Sir Sean Connery
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Nov 02, 2020, 12:29:07 AM
To be fair, Attenborough was a better casting choice in the end.

Connery may have been better if they were trying to stick closer to the book's portrayal of Hammond, where he's kind of an uncaring asshole. I'm not saying Connery was an asshole, but I think he would have played that type of Hammond better.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Nov 07, 2020, 05:18:07 PM
https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/1325096939684290560
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Nov 09, 2020, 04:19:12 PM
Quote from: DeadlineThe $165M Universal blockbuster wrapped this morning at the UK's Pinewood Studios after an unprecedented shoot, which required 40,000 COVID tests, millions of dollars spent on protocols, and for cast and key crew to isolate in a bubble for months.

https://twitter.com/DEADLINE/status/1325089177331879936
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Dec 10, 2020, 06:20:09 PM
https://twitter.com/slashfilm/status/1337034620722790400
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Dec 10, 2020, 08:14:00 PM
Judging by the first video, a version of the film more faithful to the book, would be R rating for sure. And apparently, Spielberg not only modified the size of the Dilophosaurus, but also made its ferocity less graphic, probably in order not to overshadow the Utahraptors Velociraptors.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MyyHEVmn8bE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AztA3Qj0r4A

Also Hammond was originally conceived by Crichton as a dick  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Dec 15, 2020, 05:14:40 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAfQhqzZU98
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: mez86 on Dec 15, 2020, 05:50:47 PM
Cobra Kai and this for january i carnt wait for the binge watch
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Dec 20, 2020, 10:23:12 PM
https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/1340637204691955712
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: aliens13 on Jan 14, 2021, 03:30:29 PM
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8Dzh0NY3YX0&pbjreload=101 (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8Dzh0NY3YX0&pbjreload=101)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: aliens13 on Mar 12, 2021, 01:15:17 AM
https://youtu.be/PHv1vD-eQEw (https://youtu.be/PHv1vD-eQEw)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Mar 12, 2021, 06:17:48 AM
Quote from: aliens13 on Mar 12, 2021, 01:15:17 AM
https://youtu.be/PHv1vD-eQEw (https://youtu.be/PHv1vD-eQEw)
Season 3 already? Wow, they're just cranking this out. Kinda shows, actually. Season 2 was a big step down from season 1.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: aliens13 on Mar 12, 2021, 06:55:29 PM
Quote from: Stitch on Mar 12, 2021, 06:17:48 AM
Quote from: aliens13 on Mar 12, 2021, 01:15:17 AM
https://youtu.be/PHv1vD-eQEw (https://youtu.be/PHv1vD-eQEw)
Season 3 already? Wow, they're just cranking this out. Kinda shows, actually. Season 2 was a big step down from season 1.
For me, the season 2 was just as good as season 1. The only thing that always annoys me are the dialogues of the kids, but it's comprehensive because it's a kids show. But overall it's a good story... just I don't like the idea of another hybrid in Nublar but we have to wait and see how it turns out.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Mar 14, 2021, 02:45:01 AM
Just realized (watching on AMC) that Henry Kingi aka El Scorpio is in Lost World: Jurassic Park.  He is one of the InGen 2nd team members that you see help break up the fight between Vince Vaughn and Peter Stormare's characters.  First thing that caught my attention was the long hair, lol.

1:14 mark

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4_1nFd3R4k

You can also wee the silhouette of him at 2:47 mark running from the T-Rex (again the hair, lol)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=za68GwiouNo
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 15, 2021, 06:24:29 PM
Cryptic tweet

https://twitter.com/JurassicWorld/status/1382758704416653314
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Apr 16, 2021, 03:57:50 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Apr 15, 2021, 06:24:29 PM
Cryptic tweet

https://twitter.com/JurassicWorld/status/1382758704416653314

The owner of The Claw.

(https://i.ibb.co/VSXbhxc/csLTqrt5.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Lizardboy on Apr 16, 2021, 10:50:40 AM
That pic is from Fallen Kingdom.

Also fan art of the new hybrid from Camp Cretaceous season 3;

Spoiler
(https://external-preview.redd.it/WKDi0f-aJn6X7WjqAP3i-8AMYyx_bPuZja9vWcJP9kw.jpg?width=960&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=0dec0f6a3caee0e21b22384aa9f418e0ec226822)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huggs on Apr 16, 2021, 07:28:15 PM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Apr 16, 2021, 03:57:50 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Apr 15, 2021, 06:24:29 PM
Cryptic tweet

https://twitter.com/JurassicWorld/status/1382758704416653314

The owner of The Claw.

https://i.ibb.co/VSXbhxc/csLTqrt5.jpg

Best back scratcher.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Apr 17, 2021, 04:54:14 AM
Quote from: Huggs on Apr 16, 2021, 07:28:15 PM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Apr 16, 2021, 03:57:50 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Apr 15, 2021, 06:24:29 PM
Cryptic tweet

https://twitter.com/JurassicWorld/status/1382758704416653314

The owner of The Claw.

https://i.ibb.co/VSXbhxc/csLTqrt5.jpg

Best back scratcher.

I have no doubt this boy is a professional 6 foot turkey trainer. He just had to change his name and do some therapy.

(https://s4.gifyu.com/images/66b4b1251e28eaf5b015ae51a003a495.gif)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 04, 2021, 06:07:13 PM
Preview of the score for JW: Dominion from Colin's IG page:

https://smihub.com/c/1688069137783865652

**Only way I can view IG pages without an account of my own.

These photos are from Giacchino's IG page

(https://cdn3.smihub.com/view?q=%3DMDM2Q2M40DZpN3Xj52XmIjQ0UDOCBjN9U2bmYGMkFWY4IWMkVTMiljZhBjN5UDNlJTZmlzNxQ2MhV2Y9g2bmQTL30jYjNmJBFUQBJUVqZnQCFUQ90GZlZiZhpFMO9FWBFlQBpXchp2csplY9MGav91Yu9lJxATM9QXYj91Yu9lJ0Vmbu4GZjJmZuEmbm5SMtEjdptmZu0WYydWY0Nnbp1Ddo91Yu9lJx0Dc09zZwpmLu9FN4QzN4QjN0kDMyEDNzMDN1kzNfVDN4QDN5gDNxcDNycDN0EzX4UDM3cjNwgTMvADOwEDewgDMxM3L1MTZvUTMtUDO4IjLxUDdvY3L0Vmbu4GZjJmZuEmbm5SMtEjdptmZu0WYydWY0Nnbp9yL6MHc0RHa)

Last day of scoring for @JurassicWorld Dominion. It's been an incredible 10 days with the orchestra and crew at Abbey Road Studios . Thanks for making an incredibly difficult process seem effortless! Big kudos to my team and engineers Peter Cobbin and Kirsty Whalley!

(https://cdn3.smihub.com/view?q=zAjNkNDO9QWaz91Yu9lJ4QkR3gjQwYTPl9mJldzY4UjN0EmNzQmZhJWMkRTNxQDMkRGN2U2YkJWYzEWPo9mJ00yN9I2YjZSQBFUQCVla2JkQBFUPtRWZm0EWtkXZtgVQ0gEeyNjaYRlMEpXPjh2bfNmbfZyMwETP0F2YfNmbfZSbvNmLtFmcnFGdz5WauR2YuETLzwWZo1CduVGdu92Yz1Ddo91Yu9lJx0Dc09zZwpmLu9VN3UzN0cTM3QTO0kTN4czN2kjNfVTO1EDO1ETOyAzM3AzNx8FO1YDM4kjN3EzLwgDMxgHM4ATMz9SNzU2L1ETL1gDOy4SM1Q3L29SbvNmLtFmcnFGdz5WauR2YuETLzwWZo1CduVGdu92Yz9yL6MHc0RHa)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on May 09, 2021, 01:56:35 PM
These are too cool -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUtFa6XUVV8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10FjPL9h7_o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icxXY4vCXsw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CduPI9u7FRo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXwlDFmIgxQ
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on May 09, 2021, 03:46:51 PM
Quote from: Gilfryd on May 09, 2021, 01:56:35 PM
These are too cool -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUtFa6XUVV8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10FjPL9h7_o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icxXY4vCXsw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CduPI9u7FRo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXwlDFmIgxQ

You made my Sunday with these videos.  :o Thanks! 😉
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 11, 2021, 03:06:52 PM
New BTS pic

https://twitter.com/empiremagazine/status/1392057637848723456
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on May 11, 2021, 05:46:17 PM
I'm interested, but unfortunately Trevorrow doesn't shine neither as a director or writer...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Jun 07, 2021, 04:16:16 PM
Lots of cool stuff here -

IT'S JURASSIC JUNE! REVISIT THE DINOSAURS OF JURASSIC PARK 1-3 BEHIND THE SCENES AT STAN WINSTON STUDIO. (https://www.stanwinstonschool.com/blog/jurassic-world-jp-dinosaurs-behind-the-scenes)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 09, 2021, 09:34:14 PM
IMAX preview to debut with F9 and new poster

https://twitter.com/JurassicWorld/status/1402729956161966080

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E3d_dfyVUAAFNEl?format=jpg&name=large)

Image from FB account

Quote65 Million Years in the making. #JurassicWorldDominion

(https://scontent-mia3-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.6435-9/192155895_4288924987819018_8233651942475614325_n.jpg?_nc_cat=103&ccb=1-3&_nc_sid=a26aad&_nc_ohc=A9OsmfEiCHUAX8NeIXQ&_nc_ht=scontent-mia3-2.xx&oh=95808d7095ceef5d2d5180decb4f4b21&oe=60E66407)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SuperiorIronman on Jun 10, 2021, 11:35:36 AM
The footage description sounds a little too fan-fiction with out of era/location dinosaurs to facilitate the origin of Hammond's cane.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 21, 2021, 04:12:36 PM
https://twitter.com/JurassicWorld/status/1407005595144654852
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: 426Buddy on Jun 21, 2021, 07:14:03 PM
Quote from: SuperiorIronman on Jun 10, 2021, 11:35:36 AM
The footage description sounds a little too fan-fiction with out of era/location dinosaurs to facilitate the origin of Hammond's cane.

Yeah they're not even trying anymore
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 21, 2021, 07:41:18 PM
If Montana circa 65 million years ago doesn't look like today's Patagonia, then it's not Montana circa 65 million years ago.

(https://i.ibb.co/xgFBNjD/Pics-Art-06-21-03-30-54.png)

Edit ~ Ignore the inaccurate Sue restoration, and maybe all my words.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: 426Buddy on Jun 21, 2021, 09:16:01 PM
I love the idea of the flashback, but all of the potential seems to have been wasted.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 21, 2021, 11:28:54 PM
Yeah, seems to be the case. Also, I remember that Dr. Henry Wu mentions how different real dinosaurs would look, since as the source material itself recognizes; the creatures of this universe are genetically engineered monsters. I know it's not going to happen, but I think this flashback was the perfect chance to feature scientifically accurate dinosaurs, creating an interesting contrast to the creatures Ingen created in the future / present.

(https://i.ibb.co/gyVtGj4/Pics-Art-06-21-07-12-12.jpg)

Edit: Kinda like...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUtFa6XUVV8
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 22, 2021, 12:18:08 AM
I'd love, just as an inside joke, a fight between a Utah Raptor and Velociraptor.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 22, 2021, 12:23:43 AM
(https://s6.gifyu.com/images/giphy-4a4d538d3650d7530.gif)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SuperiorIronman on Jun 22, 2021, 02:26:54 AM
Having seen the (leaked) footage I can safely say, I have no idea why they did this.

It's basically a few shots of dinosaurs and then a very quick fight. I think it was over quicker than the spino/rex fight back in JP3. Granted I could've been missing footage but I think I got the idea. It's basically an origin for the rex and why it's going to fight the giga in the film. Either it's an intentional callback or we're gonna pull genetic memory out of our ass and they happen to get the exact giga that killed the rex. It's just a weird addition.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 22, 2021, 03:37:05 AM
But Giga lived about 30 million years before T. rex, and far, far way in what is now Argentina (Gondwana at the time).

Edit- is there a Giganotosaurus in Jurassic World: Dominion?  :o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: City Hunter Yautja on Jul 14, 2021, 06:29:28 AM
JP was the best, TLWJP was a mess, JPIII had some finesse, JW I did digest, JWFK was a jest, and JWD will finally put the series to rest.

Seriously though, I love these movies, but we are reaching Ian Malcom "I don't care!" (TLWJP) territory.

I predict prequels all set in the Triassic, Jurassic, and Cretaceous Periods. No dialogue, just dinos doing there thing and mosquitos flying around taking samples of their blood with a Mr. DNA chime sound. :p

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Oct 01, 2021, 02:32:54 AM
https://twitter.com/IGN/status/1443765365339738120
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Nov 23, 2021, 05:33:15 PM
Spoiler
While Giganotosaurus and T. Rex lived millions of years apart and in different areas, I'm glad they finally featured Giga.
[close]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkEU6fC_nhY
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Nov 23, 2021, 10:12:25 PM
Ok finally got around to Battle at Big Rock, in 10 minutes it combines the best of aspects of JW and JWFK.

Liked the Prologue too, dorks can keep complaining about the inaccuracies.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Nov 23, 2021, 11:24:05 PM
Quote from: Gilfryd on Nov 23, 2021, 10:12:25 PM
Ok finally got around to Battle at Big Rock, in 10 minutes it combines the best of aspects of JW and JWFK.

Liked the Prologue too, dorks can keep complaining about the inaccuracies.
You know what else is inaccurate? That people don't like it. That would never happen in real life. QED.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Nov 23, 2021, 11:42:08 PM
I really enjoyed the prologue, and I'll definitely see this on the big screen.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master Chief on Nov 24, 2021, 02:35:18 PM
Was anything added to the prologue?  I feel like I've see all of the footage before, but not sure where.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Dachande on Nov 24, 2021, 03:22:49 PM
Quote from: Master Chief on Nov 24, 2021, 02:35:18 PM
Was anything added to the prologue?  I feel like I've see all of the footage before, but not sure where.

From what i've read before, i don't think so. It was originally attached to the start of the last Fast and Furious film, i think.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master Chief on Nov 24, 2021, 04:18:42 PM
That's right!  The prologue was the main reason I went to see the Fast and Furious film in the theater.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Nov 24, 2021, 05:39:42 PM
The prologue was a bit similar to that episode of Walking with Dinosaurs with Nigel Marven  :laugh: where the naturalist documents a pack of Giganotosaurus stalking a migratory herd of Argentinosaurus.

(https://s5.gifyu.com/images/gif-241a3d55a21e237d9.gif)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: nanison on Nov 24, 2021, 07:18:51 PM
I'm probably one of the few that loved fallen kingdom. The franchise finally starts to embrace the ridiculousness. The t rex scene in the truck for example is the best suspenseful scene involving a t rex since the first film. Using the dino with thick skull to escape prison? Genius, embrace the possibilities! Then turning JP into a gothic haunted house film I just loved it! Sure the plot is wafer thin but after the first film there isn't much to add in terms of plot so just go all out and come up with cool set pieces and they're doing just that imo. I can imagine the 6th entry will have some out of this world set pieces and action.
It worked for the F&F franchise so it is the right way to go!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Nov 24, 2021, 09:15:59 PM
Trevorrow's a bad director and a terrible screenwriter. I think there's no rational reason to get excited here. And I do love dinosaurs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Nov 24, 2021, 09:20:07 PM
Quote from: BigDaddyJohn on Nov 24, 2021, 09:15:59 PM
Trevorrow's a bad director and a terrible screenwriter. I think there's no rational reason to get excited here. And I do love dinosaurs.
Counterpoint: Jurassic World was cool and good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Nov 24, 2021, 11:22:28 PM
Mainly due to Bayona's artistic vision and direction though. The story was really lame.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Thatguy2068 on Nov 25, 2021, 01:19:53 AM
Quote from: nanison on Nov 24, 2021, 07:18:51 PM
I'm probably one of the few that loved fallen kingdom. The franchise finally starts to embrace the ridiculousness. The t rex scene in the truck for example is the best suspenseful scene involving a t rex since the first film. Using the dino with thick skull to escape prison? Genius, embrace the possibilities! Then turning JP into a gothic haunted house film I just loved it! Sure the plot is wafer thin but after the first film there isn't much to add in terms of plot so just go all out and come up with cool set pieces and they're doing just that imo. I can imagine the 6th entry will have some out of this world set pieces and action.
It worked for the F&F franchise so it is the right way to go!
I am with you man I really do like fallen Kingdom. The Indoraptor was probably my favorite hybrid out of the whole series
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Russ840 on Nov 25, 2021, 11:07:55 AM
Quote from: BigDaddyJohn on Nov 24, 2021, 11:22:28 PM
Mainly due to Bayona's artistic vision and direction though. The story was really lame.

Bayona had nothing to do with Jurassic World
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Nov 25, 2021, 11:57:20 AM
He was under studio control obviously, but still managed to get some of his vision into this movie, which are the better parts, fortunately.

EDIT : I just understood you talked about the first jurassic world lol, my bad.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Nov 25, 2021, 05:19:14 PM
Quote from: BigDaddyJohn on Nov 24, 2021, 11:22:28 PM
Mainly due to Bayona's artistic vision and direction though. The story was really lame.
Definitely disagree, seeing a functioning dinosaur theme park has been a fantasy of mine since I was a little kid, so seeing one on the big screen brought out my inner 9-year-old.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: iain on Nov 25, 2021, 05:23:08 PM
That prologue killed my hype.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 25, 2021, 07:04:14 PM
I personally like Fallen Kingdom a lot more than the first Jurassic World.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Thatguy2068 on Nov 26, 2021, 08:51:00 AM
I may have a thing for indoraptor, I just love it too much
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Nov 26, 2021, 12:17:48 PM
But the cage scene was sooo cartoony and goofy, it was really stupid.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BlueMarsalis79 on Nov 26, 2021, 01:10:32 PM
I don't think this has ever worked as a franchise.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Thatguy2068 on Nov 26, 2021, 04:29:12 PM
Well that ok it's your opinion and I'm not changing it, i'm just putting my thoughts on the Indoraptor that all. I do you agree that the cage scene was goofy but I found it in a good way.  But it's ok to think otherwise I'm not gate keeping
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 26, 2021, 05:03:07 PM
Fallen Kingdom is definitely a bit goofy, but that's partially why it works better than the first Jurassic World. Bayona's a much more interesting director than Trevorrow, and his film actually has a bit of style that he brings to it, especially once they reach the pretty absurd horror mansion stuff in the second half.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Nov 26, 2021, 06:21:08 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 26, 2021, 05:03:07 PM
Fallen Kingdom is definitely a bit goofy, but that's partially why it works better than the first Jurassic World. Bayona's a much more interesting director than Trevorrow, and his film actually has a bit of style that he brings to it, especially once they reach the pretty absurd horror mansion stuff in the second half.

I wholeheartedly agree.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Nov 26, 2021, 07:27:17 PM
I liked the gothic horror atmosphere in that part of the movie.

(https://s10.gifyu.com/images/CapitalFreeEchidna-size_restricted.gif)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kradan on Nov 26, 2021, 07:34:20 PM
I've seen only chunks of Fallen Kingdom and all I remember is dinos running around the mansion. I think it was a neat idea
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 26, 2021, 07:36:14 PM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Nov 26, 2021, 07:27:17 PM
I liked the gothic horror atmosphere in that part of the movie.

https://s10.gifyu.com/images/CapitalFreeEchidna-size_restricted.gif

(https://www.indiewire.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/2482_SB_00012R.jpg?resize=800,335)
(https://rosenbach.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/nosferatu-bite.jpg)

:D :D :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Nov 26, 2021, 09:29:16 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Nov 26, 2021, 07:36:14 PM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Nov 26, 2021, 07:27:17 PM
I liked the gothic horror atmosphere in that part of the movie.

https://s10.gifyu.com/images/CapitalFreeEchidna-size_restricted.gif

(https://www.indiewire.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/2482_SB_00012R.jpg?resize=800,335)
(https://rosenbach.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/nosferatu-bite.jpg)

:D :D :D

Completely accurate! :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Nov 27, 2021, 01:10:17 AM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Nov 26, 2021, 07:27:17 PM
I liked the gothic horror atmosphere in that part of the movie.

https://s10.gifyu.com/images/CapitalFreeEchidna-size_restricted.gif
Totally agree. It was awesome.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: nanison on Nov 27, 2021, 07:38:01 PM
Good to know I'm not the only one who likes it.
I feel people always want their action movies to be realistic and everything needs to be plausible and explained. That is not the point of making an action/ adventure spectacle though. With the dinosaurs now running amuck in cities there should be endless possibilities to come up with insane set pieces.
Some movies get away with it like fast and furious franchise, mission impossible or marvel films others are held under a magnifying glass to criticize everything that isn't even remotely realistic like fallen kingdom. Maybe double standards I don't know.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kradan on Nov 27, 2021, 07:57:48 PM
Well, first Jurassic Park was praised for being somewhat scientifically accurate. I guess, it set the expectations for following entries
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Nov 28, 2021, 01:40:02 AM
Indeed! The tone was serious enough to make one pay attention to its themes of genetic engineering and chaos theory, with the second being similar enough to the Arthur Conan Doyle fiction to be enjoyed. However, the franchise became almost like Kaiju movies from there. :laugh:

From the best to the worst for me  8):

1. Jurassic Park
2. The Lost World: Jurassic Park
3. Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom
4. Jurassic World
5. Jurassic Park³



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jY_BHe-vnIM
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Thatguy2068 on Nov 28, 2021, 03:15:15 AM
For me
1. Jurassic Park
2. Jurassic World fallen kingdom = Jurassic World
3. Jurassic Park the lost world
4. Jurassic Park 3
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Nov 28, 2021, 10:28:24 AM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Nov 28, 2021, 01:40:02 AM
From the best to the worst for me  8):

1. Jurassic Park
2. The Lost World: Jurassic Park
3. Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom
4. Jurassic World
5. Jurassic Park³
That's definitely the right order!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Nov 28, 2021, 01:11:50 PM
Quote from: Stitch on Nov 28, 2021, 10:28:24 AM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Nov 28, 2021, 01:40:02 AM
From the best to the worst for me  8):

1. Jurassic Park
2. The Lost World: Jurassic Park
3. Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom
4. Jurassic World
5. Jurassic Park³
That's definitely the right order!

Do you rank the movies in that way?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: nanison on Nov 28, 2021, 09:04:15 PM
Jurassic park
Fallen kingdom
Jurassic world
Jurassic park 3
The lost world
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr.Turok on Nov 29, 2021, 07:33:43 AM
Quote from: BigDaddyJohn on Nov 26, 2021, 12:17:48 PM
But the cage scene was sooo cartoony and goofy, it was really stupid.

In one way, I can see that, as it is kind of reminiscent of a Tom and Jerry skit, but on the other way, the fact that it enjoys f**king with people right before it kills them and has the ability to smile at your suffering just sells the fact this animal is no way shape and form, a "real" animal. Least the Indominus Rex was made that way part due to genetics and part due poor living conditions that made it a crazed killer, other predators like TRex and Velociraptor do it due to hunger or territorial reasons, but this mofo is a born psychopath. 

Just wished we could have seen it more in action, the thing had perfect night vision and sense of smell, should have actually make the next half of the film a real horror atmosphere of just trying to evade the thing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Thatguy2068 on Nov 29, 2021, 08:26:00 AM
Quote from: Mr.Turok on Nov 29, 2021, 07:33:43 AM
Quote from: BigDaddyJohn on Nov 26, 2021, 12:17:48 PM
But the cage scene was sooo cartoony and goofy, it was really stupid.

In one way, I can see that, as it is kind of reminiscent of a Tom and Jerry skit, but on the other way, the fact that it enjoys f**king with people right before it kills them and has the ability to smile at your suffering just sells the fact this animal is no way shape and form, a "real" animal. Least the Indominus Rex was made that way part due to genetics and part due poor living conditions that made it a crazed killer, other predators like TRex and Velociraptor do it due to hunger or territorial reasons, but this mofo is a born psychopath. 

Just wished we could have seen it more in action, the thing had perfect night vision and sense of smell, should have actually make the next half of the film a real horror atmosphere of just trying to evade the thing.
I totally agree with your statement, I actually think that Indoraptor is the best part of the film. I do wonder what would have happen if Indoraptor had escaped the Lockwood Matter. This Mofo is hard to put down if you don't have any explosive material
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Nov 29, 2021, 12:41:55 PM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Nov 28, 2021, 01:11:50 PM
Quote from: Stitch on Nov 28, 2021, 10:28:24 AM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Nov 28, 2021, 01:40:02 AM
From the best to the worst for me  8):

1. Jurassic Park
2. The Lost World: Jurassic Park
3. Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom
4. Jurassic World
5. Jurassic Park³
That's definitely the right order!

Do you rank the movies in that way?
Of course. That's the right order!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Dec 06, 2021, 07:29:07 PM
https://twitter.com/DiscussingFilm/status/1467931904582332431
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Kradan on Dec 06, 2021, 09:35:37 PM
 :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Dec 15, 2021, 11:05:47 PM
https://twitter.com/EW/status/1471165697891962884
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Dec 15, 2021, 11:45:14 PM
Well, Jurassic House was already pretty different. :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Dec 17, 2021, 12:09:16 AM
https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/1471629688535760900
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Dec 20, 2021, 11:06:37 PM
New photo

https://twitter.com/empiremagazine/status/1472945953619554306
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jan 07, 2022, 10:33:11 PM
New photo

https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/1479562348977397762
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Thatguy2068 on Jan 13, 2022, 04:45:17 PM
Indoraptor vs Scorpius Rex
https://youtu.be/sIApRCB_yN0https://youtu.be/sIApRCB_yN0
It pretty cool Fight analysis
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jan 13, 2022, 05:25:40 PM
TY! I'm always hungry for dinosaur content  8)

(https://s10.gifyu.com/images/homer-simpsons-the-simpsons.gif)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jan 21, 2022, 03:41:00 PM
TV Spot

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PnsYau37Upw
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master Chief on Jan 21, 2022, 05:35:30 PM
Great marketing!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jan 29, 2022, 01:31:48 AM
New TV spot.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhUNnvA_zJs
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jan 31, 2022, 08:45:23 PM
Is anyone here surprised? :laugh:

https://twitter.com/slashfilm/status/1487107289060462604
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 31, 2022, 08:46:02 PM
"Stick with me now... Triassic World."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jan 31, 2022, 09:53:56 PM
'Cretaceous Park' with lots of feathers and a fat T. Rex with lips that doesn't roar, as well as the chaos theory equation explained by M. Night Shyamalan (as Ian Malcolm) or GTF!  >:(

(https://i.ibb.co/YbJg8fy/Chaos-Theory-Equations-That-Changed-the-World-Abakcus-1024x756-removebg-preview.png)

On the other hand, I bet 'Cambrian Park' would be almost lovecraftian  8)

(https://i.ibb.co/KhN7D7K/41586-2016-Article-BF530268a-Figa-HTML.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Jan 31, 2022, 10:18:48 PM
I vote that after Dominion we let Jurassic Park rest for a while. Instead, I hereby submit my hopes and dreams for the inevitable theatrical The Suicide Squad sequel:

(https://storage.googleapis.com/hipcomic/p/85b3b6cae22a0868f566bb05fbad32ff.jpg)
(https://www.silveragecomics.com/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/960x/040ec09b1e35df139433887a97daa66f/s/t/star-spangled-war-stories-105-gdvg-dinosaur-cover0.JPG)

Give me the next Suicide Squad roster stranded on a Skull Island/Lost World-esque island that time forgot, pitted up against a bunch of vintage Hollywood not-so-scientifically-accurate dinosaurs that never died out (and hey, Aquaman already established living dinosaurs in the modern day DCEU!).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jan 31, 2022, 10:45:16 PM
Cool!  8)

(https://s10.gifyu.com/images/63fxmc.gif)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BlueMarsalis79 on Jan 31, 2022, 11:38:59 PM
I like your idea lots NA.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Feb 01, 2022, 12:24:15 AM
Or kick Tim Burton in the ass and finally make a Dinosaurs Attack! movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 01, 2022, 12:33:33 AM
Aliens Attack! vs Dinosaurs Attack!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Feb 01, 2022, 01:30:31 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vc5LGmz66GU
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Feb 10, 2022, 02:22:02 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fb5ELWi-ekk
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Feb 10, 2022, 03:52:26 PM
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Feb 10, 2022, 02:22:02 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fb5ELWi-ekk

Feathers! and not only in the therizinosaurus but in a dromaeosaurid dinosaur 😍

I really liked the John Hammond quote, and seeing Alan & Ellie back is very nostalgic.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3oVUmfKHNE
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mr.Turok on Feb 10, 2022, 04:20:40 PM
I'm super curious to see how...

Spoiler
...did Blue have a kid? Was there another male raptor we aren't aware of?
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Feb 10, 2022, 09:12:25 PM
I'm hoping the cgi will be significantly better. I know it's just the trailer, but some of the digital compositing in that was pretty bad.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master Chief on Feb 10, 2022, 09:51:30 PM
Quote from: Mr.Turok on Feb 10, 2022, 04:20:40 PM
I'm super curious to see how...

Spoiler
...did Blue have a kid? Was there another male raptor we aren't aware of?
[close]

She has a pack and mated with one of the males.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: irn on Feb 11, 2022, 01:10:57 AM
It still has the false location look that the other two Jurassic World's had. Like the final shot in the trailer just doesn't give the sense that the characters are outdoors in the woods. It just feels like they are standing in a warm studio after having lunch.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Feb 13, 2022, 03:49:26 AM
Quote from: Stitch on Feb 10, 2022, 09:12:25 PM
I'm hoping the cgi will be significantly better. I know it's just the trailer, but some of the digital compositing in that was pretty bad.
CGI in trailers is always unfinished, and is never representative of the final product.

Also, new classic Jurassic Park lego set got announced, T-rex Breakout:

https://www.lego.com/en-us/product/t-rex-breakout-76956
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: City Hunter Yautja on Apr 01, 2022, 09:52:02 PM
Quote from: Mr.Turok on Feb 10, 2022, 04:20:40 PM
I'm super curious to see how...

Spoiler
...did Blue have a kid? Was there another male raptor we aren't aware of?
[close]

Spoiler
Perhaps that fight with the Indoraptor in the bedroom wasn't just a fight...

(https://i.makeagif.com/media/9-02-2018/deI7pi.gif)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: RidgeTop on Apr 02, 2022, 08:42:45 AM
The theory is actually...

Spoiler
The dinosaurs are reproducing asexually (via parthenogenesis) because of the spliced DNA. Hence why Beta looks exactly like Blue. Some animals do this (https://www.nationalgeographic.org/article/how-asexual-lizard-procreates-alone/#:~:text=It's%20a%20genetic%2Ddiversity%20advantage,changes%20from%20generation%20to%20generation.). Essentially cloning themselves.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: bobby brown on Apr 02, 2022, 08:56:51 AM
Maybe Chris pratt is the dad.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: judge death on Apr 02, 2022, 09:39:54 AM
I dont see how in logic sense this third movie can happen: a few dinos escaped from that lab/mansion in one country, now they are everywhere and lots of them? WTF, did the military around the world and nations, UN, nato etc sleep this by? Those few dinos would been hunted down in the second police and people report in sightings plus from those who wanted to buy the dinos.

That alone makes me hope the movie have a damn good explanation on or else I dont buy it and need to turn off my brain to enjoy it. xD
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: T Dog on Apr 02, 2022, 10:41:27 AM
Quote from: judge death on Apr 02, 2022, 09:39:54 AM
I dont see how in logic sense this third movie can happen:

Shutup and consume product!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: 426Buddy on Apr 02, 2022, 12:19:33 PM
I don't see how logically the first movie could happen lol.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Apr 02, 2022, 10:00:34 PM
Dinosaurs are cool and good.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Thatguy2068 on Apr 03, 2022, 12:43:06 AM
Indoraptor is a Pretty cool hybrid
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: City Hunter Yautja on Apr 03, 2022, 05:23:19 AM
Quote from: bobby brown on Apr 02, 2022, 08:56:51 AM
Maybe Chris pratt is the dad.

This made me ROFL.

Another possibility is
Spoiler
Dr. Henry Wu somehow was able to get a sample of Blue's blood, perhaps from when Zia was trying to stop the bleeding of Blue; Franklin even got Blue's blood in his mouth plugging the wound before the T-Rex blood transfusion.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 08, 2022, 10:14:33 PM
(https://scontent-dfw5-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/278154481_10160243675012708_3160651480544551642_n.jpg?_nc_cat=1&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=wuHWAu6D68kAX83s11u&tn=2SlQGFP24tYEvNDZ&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-2.xx&oh=00_AT_BhYeAOGrg-4Z2n6F7aB9BJMiWO3CLoYolMxP-z8ru5Q&oe=6255AE38)

(https://scontent-dfw5-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/278168491_10160243675027708_3269324849237924121_n.jpg?_nc_cat=1&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=XjCIJ_vEsOkAX_ZyWn3&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-2.xx&oh=00_AT-fO5Kt7WZLQvhGtShz9xMji0ASsg1Wng4w75Emzue-fw&oe=6255C67B)

(https://cdn.onebauer.media/one/media/6250/20ac/e311/3f6f/cb92/5641/giga-tw.jpg?format=jpg&quality=80&width=1800&ratio=16-9&resize=aspectfill)

https://www.empireonline.com/movies/news/jurassic-world-dominions-huge-new-dinosaur-the-giga-is-like-the-joker-says-colin-trevorrow-exclusive-image/?fbclid=IwAR19KFAbfwSjA7M4VIhYDugbZ7Hcd9lzzpIK1mGNa24fqIO2aQFUOPH85eY
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 13, 2022, 01:21:50 AM
https://twitter.com/empiremagazine/status/1513478625349324802
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Apr 13, 2022, 01:41:28 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Apr 08, 2022, 10:14:33 PM
(https://cdn.onebauer.media/one/media/6250/20ac/e311/3f6f/cb92/5641/giga-tw.jpg?format=jpg&quality=80&width=1800&ratio=16-9&resize=aspectfill)

Giganotosaurus carolinii is the Joker's spirit animal!  :o

(https://i.ibb.co/fFmMCfD/Giganotosaurus-at-Fernbank.jpg)

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master Chief on Apr 13, 2022, 04:23:03 PM
https://www.instagram.com/p/CcSvLrnuP1l/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Apr 14, 2022, 10:09:51 PM
https://youtu.be/818oF0RiRvI

(https://i.ibb.co/yhsQx26/Pics-Art-04-14-06-08-30.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: nanison on Apr 15, 2022, 12:08:24 AM
2,5 hours of Dino mayhem, I'm ready!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 20, 2022, 01:21:39 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5NSK40nrY8

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master Chief on Apr 20, 2022, 05:13:01 PM
Owen has the power to stop all things with his hands.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Apr 20, 2022, 11:28:19 PM
He just needs to drive a Cadillac.  8)

(https://s10.gifyu.com/images/tumblr_nvalg2boXK1snfynjo2_500.gif)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Apr 22, 2022, 02:17:59 AM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Apr 20, 2022, 11:28:19 PM
He just needs to drive a Cadillac.  8)

https://s10.gifyu.com/images/tumblr_nvalg2boXK1snfynjo2_500.gif
God a Xenozoic/Cadillacs & Dinosaurs movie would rule.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 22, 2022, 02:38:27 AM
Quote from: Master Chief on Apr 20, 2022, 05:13:01 PM
Owen has the power to stop all things with his hands.

Jurassic Park / Star Wars crossover .
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Corporal Hicks on Apr 22, 2022, 07:35:59 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 22, 2022, 02:17:59 AM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Apr 20, 2022, 11:28:19 PM
He just needs to drive a Cadillac.  8)

https://s10.gifyu.com/images/tumblr_nvalg2boXK1snfynjo2_500.gif
God a Xenozoic/Cadillacs & Dinosaurs movie would rule.

Someone on my friends list shared some covers from the old Dark Horse Jurassic Park magazines and it looked like they were including Xenozoic in those mags!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xiggz456 on Apr 22, 2022, 02:44:36 PM
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Apr 22, 2022, 07:35:59 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 22, 2022, 02:17:59 AM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Apr 20, 2022, 11:28:19 PM
He just needs to drive a Cadillac.  8)

https://s10.gifyu.com/images/tumblr_nvalg2boXK1snfynjo2_500.gif
God a Xenozoic/Cadillacs & Dinosaurs movie would rule.

Someone on my friends list shared some covers from the old Dark Horse Jurassic Park magazines and it looked like they were including Xenozoic in those mags!

That's awesome! I read both of those comics growing up! Honestly why Mark Schultz is one of my favorites. Looking forward to that podcast you have with him!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Apr 23, 2022, 05:25:12 PM
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Apr 22, 2022, 07:35:59 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Apr 22, 2022, 02:17:59 AM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Apr 20, 2022, 11:28:19 PM
He just needs to drive a Cadillac.  8)

https://s10.gifyu.com/images/tumblr_nvalg2boXK1snfynjo2_500.gif
God a Xenozoic/Cadillacs & Dinosaurs movie would rule.

Someone on my friends list shared some covers from the old Dark Horse Jurassic Park magazines and it looked like they were including Xenozoic in those mags!
I've never seen Dark Horse JP comics, are they reprints of the Topps stuff or totally new stories?

The Topps stories were neat, I wanted to work some elements of them into my 'Return to Jurassic Park' movie pitch idea I was kicking around before 'Jurassic World' got announced.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Apr 28, 2022, 04:34:40 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9Yj-ncZkdk
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master Chief on Apr 28, 2022, 06:41:23 PM
This one shows a little more.  Poor guy on the electric scooter...what was he thinking? haha

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtQycgMD4HQ
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Apr 29, 2022, 04:26:11 AM
Yes! plenty of dinosaurs in media  8) What a time to be alive! 🦕🦖😍
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 01, 2022, 06:32:40 PM
(https://i0.wp.com/bloody-disgusting.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/jw4-scaled.jpg?ssl=1)

(https://s8d3.turboimg.net/sp/b8cd7378743ead7d96ec81a267936a81/jwd4.jpg)

(https://s8d4.turboimg.net/sp/af49b72b12826dea8564c159c5854a4c/jwd23.jpg)

(https://s8d2.turboimg.net/sp/19a61131abfb36506892214d3240ec9f/jwd11.jpg)

(https://s8d2.turboimg.net/sp/f4f49fc1175eebf4791d61a2f8744cac/jwd13.jpg)

https://bloody-disgusting.com/movie/3712933/jurassic-world-dominion-image-gallery-opens-wide-with-over-20-sights-to-show-you/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 12, 2022, 05:07:16 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-G2QMl7_l1s
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on May 18, 2022, 10:40:57 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWOrHf7a8cc
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on May 23, 2022, 10:41:22 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxyX7mUtDoQ
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Jigsaw85 on May 24, 2022, 12:16:10 AM
Hey remember when the hunter was able take down a t-Rex with a tranquilizer in the lost world? What is every redneck, gun nut, gang member, hunter, cop, and soldier on the planet doing in this movie? Are these new dinosaurs bulletproof like the indoraptor?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Alien³ on May 27, 2022, 11:32:50 AM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on May 18, 2022, 10:40:57 PMhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWOrHf7a8cc

This is what we're working on Dinotracker.com

Added a bunch of new sightings last night. Hope everyone is having fun hunting!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on May 27, 2022, 12:41:21 PM
Quote from: Alien³ on May 27, 2022, 11:32:50 AM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on May 18, 2022, 10:40:57 PMhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWOrHf7a8cc

This is what we're working on Dinotracker.com

Added a bunch of new sightings last night. Hope everyone is having fun hunting!

TY!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on May 28, 2022, 10:18:34 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oU_qGdPzJ98
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Darkness on Jun 08, 2022, 08:24:11 PM
Review embargo is over. Only getting 1/5s in our newspapers. IGN has given it a more positive 7/10.

The criticism seems to be aimed at Chris Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard.

38% RottonTommatoes: https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/jurassic_world_dominion
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Jun 12, 2022, 08:36:40 PM
My thoughts -
Spoiler
I didn't know what to expect going into this. I enjoyed the previous Jurassic World films (I was one of the few who genuinely enjoyed Fallen Kingdom) but couldn't help but feel this would be the 'Rise of Skywalker' of JP/JW films, which it kind of is and isn't.

It's busy with a lot going on, part international action/adventure (Mission: Impossible with dinosaurs) part corporate espionage (back to the original book and movie). But I don't think it's the complete incomprehensible mess some (or most, really) are making it out to be.

What surprised me were the dinosaurs taking a major backseat to the locust/Maisie story, which is weird considering it's, you know, a Jurassic movie (and the last one supposedly). The T. rex, Blue, even the new Giga don't have much to do in the story.

Including the prologue would've helped a tiny bit, setting up the T. rex/Giga rivalry as a battle 65 million years in the making. In the finished film however it just comes across as the obligatory final dinosaur fight for the end of the movie.

The original trio sharing plenty of scenes together was a pleasant surprise, as were the amount of practical dinosaurs. Giacchino delivers another wonderful score.

You can pick apart the logistics of these movies, like holes in a genetic code, but I don't think there's anything to get upset or outraged about. If you think any of these six movies are genuinely terrible I don't know what to tell you.
[close]

Oh and...
Spoiler
Were those meant to be the Lost World Rexes at the end?

Now I wish all three Rexes had taken down the Giga.

Because why not in this movie.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Jigsaw85 on Jun 13, 2022, 12:55:58 AM
This movie was terrible. I don't understand Hollywood's obsession with stuffing their movies with as many story-lines and characters as possible.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rankles75 on Jun 13, 2022, 01:29:05 AM
Quote from: Jigsaw85 on Jun 13, 2022, 12:55:58 AMThis movie was terrible. I don't understand Hollywood's obsession with stuffing their movies with as many story-lines and characters as possible.

All you need is dinosaurs, some entertaining deaths and Jeff Goldblum. How hard can it be?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Jun 13, 2022, 07:30:25 AM
Quote from: Rankles75 on Jun 13, 2022, 01:29:05 AM
Quote from: Jigsaw85 on Jun 13, 2022, 12:55:58 AMThis movie was terrible. I don't understand Hollywood's obsession with stuffing their movies with as many story-lines and characters as possible.

All you need is dinosaurs, some entertaining deaths and Jeff Goldblum. How hard can it be?
Clearly you haven't considered the need for locusts...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Jun 13, 2022, 04:11:33 PM
I heard pretty much everywhere this was terrible... With Trevorrow at the helm I won't be surprised if it is.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 13, 2022, 07:28:27 PM
Ok so the new jurassic world is like a pearl necklace structure wherein you have the cool beads by which I mean the absolutely sophomoric dinosaur toybox action scenes interconnected by script tissue that absolutely utterly sucks

and by god this had all the cards to elevate itself compared to the other two from concepts to visuals and instead it ends in jurassic avengers 2

which is a more literal joke than you think since this thing much like its accursed predecessors is the stylistical child of the phase I-II marvel movies that define the modern blockbuster to the point they even crawled into god damned star wars go figure

Ps at least the animals didn't look like cartoon lassies and were excellently animated
Thank you for coming to my ted danson talk
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 13, 2022, 07:49:23 PM
Quote from: Omegamorph on Jun 13, 2022, 07:28:27 PMPs at least the animals didn't look like cartoon lassies and were excellently animated
Thank you for coming to my ted danson talk

You mean like this? I'm not saying that's the case, I'm just wondering ;D

(https://i.ibb.co/HnJ11zj/prehistoric-planet-photo-010302.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 13, 2022, 07:50:51 PM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 13, 2022, 07:49:23 PMYou mean like this? I'm not saying that's the case, I'm just wondering ;D

https://i.ibb.co/HnJ11zj/prehistoric-planet-photo-010302.jpg
not sure what you mean mate do you think this looks cartoony or do you think this is how the JW dinos should look?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 13, 2022, 07:57:30 PM
Quote from: Omegamorph on Jun 13, 2022, 07:50:51 PM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 13, 2022, 07:49:23 PMYou mean like this? I'm not saying that's the case, I'm just wondering ;D

https://i.ibb.co/HnJ11zj/prehistoric-planet-photo-010302.jpg
not sure what you mean mate do you think this looks cartoony or do you think this is how the JW dinos should look?

The first of both, although I'm not saying it's cartoonish, as it reminds me of a borzoi for some reason.

Regardless, it doesn't bother me that the dinosaurs in Jurassic Park aren't up to date with how science theorizes what these animals looked like.

I was also curious what cartoon lassies ones look like  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 13, 2022, 11:23:59 PM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 13, 2022, 07:57:30 PMI was also curious what cartoon lassies ones look like  ;D
that's entirely a comment on character animation as opposed to character design
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Jigsaw85 on Jun 14, 2022, 12:18:02 AM
Ever wanted a Jurassic Park movie that focused on an evil corporation using locusts to wipe out the world's food supply? Yeah, me neither.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BlueMarsalis79 on Jun 14, 2022, 01:08:04 AM
Good lord what an absolute waste.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Jun 14, 2022, 01:42:03 AM
I had a good time with Dominion. The plot was silly and the moment-to-moment narrative stuff was bad but the action sequences were super cool and it was worth watching for that alone. The whole bit in Malta was nuts from beginning to end and I loved it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 14, 2022, 06:41:59 AM
Quote from: Omegamorph on Jun 13, 2022, 11:23:59 PM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 13, 2022, 07:57:30 PMI was also curious what cartoon lassies ones look like  ;D
that's entirely a comment on character animation as opposed to character design

(https://i.ibb.co/XSxmyVZ/6jlqq1.gif)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: irn on Jun 14, 2022, 04:54:29 PM
I actually enjoyed this. Went in with very, very low expectations based on the critics reviews so that probably helped being somewhat pleasantly surprised. Definitely the second best of the full 6-part JP series in my opinion.

Spoiler
I really didn't mind the focus being on genetic engineering. It was always at the heart of the original story and it's a more logical progression on the story rather than it being yet another dinosaur chase after dinosaur chase as if it's a sequel to a video game.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 14, 2022, 11:01:05 PM
https://twitter.com/io9/status/1536384539940950017
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Jun 15, 2022, 07:46:25 PM
Quote from: Jigsaw85 on Jun 14, 2022, 12:18:02 AMEver wanted a Jurassic Park movie that focused on an evil corporation using locusts to wipe out the world's food supply? Yeah, me neither.

Ah, now eventually you do plan to have dinosaurs in your, in your dinosaur movie, right? Hello? Yes?

Quote from: Xenomrph on Jun 14, 2022, 01:42:03 AMThe whole bit in Malta was nuts from beginning to end and I loved it.

I thought it was fun in an over-the-top way too, but it was honestly odder to me than the whole lucust/Maisie thing, which seemed like two storylines from two totally different Crichton stories.

I like that the movie was able to explore genetic themes outside of cloning dinosaurs, but at the same time it's a Jurassic movie - the dinos shouldn't be window-dressing.

It's odd conflicting feelings (first two aside) but I think I would rank the movies like so -
Jurassic Park (1993)
The Lost World: Jurassic Park (1997)
Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom (2018)
Jurassic World Dominion (2022)
Jurassic Park III (2001)
Jurassic World (2015)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: reecebomb on Jun 16, 2022, 07:01:50 AM
Hmmn, first Jurassic movie I'm going to skip in cinema, f*ck this movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Jun 16, 2022, 11:23:03 PM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 14, 2022, 11:01:05 PMhttps://twitter.com/io9/status/1536384539940950017
Only need one. Why?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 17, 2022, 01:00:13 AM
Quote from: reecebomb on Jun 16, 2022, 07:01:50 AMHmmn, first Jurassic movie I'm going to skip in cinema, f*ck this movie.
good spend that money on a Yu-gi-oh booster pack instead I assure you it's a better investment
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 17, 2022, 01:15:04 AM
Quote from: Stitch on Jun 16, 2022, 11:23:03 PM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 14, 2022, 11:01:05 PMhttps://twitter.com/io9/status/1536384539940950017
Only need one. Why?

Didn't the movie leave you with questions?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Jun 17, 2022, 10:59:28 AM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 17, 2022, 01:15:04 AM
Quote from: Stitch on Jun 16, 2022, 11:23:03 PM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 14, 2022, 11:01:05 PMhttps://twitter.com/io9/status/1536384539940950017
Only need one. Why?

Didn't the movie leave you with questions?

Yes, but the main one was why? Why did they make this movie? Why didn't they make a better movie? Why did they waste the talent of the actors? Just why?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 17, 2022, 07:55:11 PM
This fell below my already rock bottom expectations. Like f**k, how do you make a JP movie that's barely even about dinosaurs?

Oh and Dimetrodons aren't f**king dinosaurs, Colin!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BlueMarsalis79 on Jun 17, 2022, 07:56:26 PM
My Dino loving friend enjoyed it, not seen it myself or the last one.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 17, 2022, 08:00:38 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 17, 2022, 07:55:11 PMThis fell below my already rock bottom expectations. Like f**k, how do you make a JP movie that's barely even about dinosaurs?

Oh and Dimetrodons aren't f**king dinosaurs, Colin!

Dimetrodon is even a mammal-like reptile or something  ;D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SR3OOP9mImI
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jun 17, 2022, 08:04:06 PM
Oh, and Colin? You do know that the Therizinosaurus was a herbivore, right? Or did you just get your info from Dino Crisis?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rankles75 on Jun 17, 2022, 09:06:23 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 17, 2022, 08:04:06 PMOh, and Colin? You do know that the Therizinosaurus was a herbivore, right? Or did you just get your info from Dino Crisis?

Perhaps it was just having a cheat day?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Jun 17, 2022, 11:54:48 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 17, 2022, 08:04:06 PMOh, and Colin? You do know that the Therizinosaurus was a herbivore, right? Or did you just get your info from Dino Crisis?
It ate vegetation in the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: nanison on Jun 17, 2022, 11:57:18 PM
Such nitpicking   :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 18, 2022, 12:24:38 AM
Quote from: Stitch on Jun 17, 2022, 11:54:48 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 17, 2022, 08:04:06 PMOh, and Colin? You do know that the Therizinosaurus was a herbivore, right? Or did you just get your info from Dino Crisis?
It ate vegetation in the movie.

It is speculated that Therizinosaurus used its claws, among other things, as self-defense against other theropods, such as tyrannosaurids, with which it shared its environment. But these sequences really seem taken from Dino Crisis 2 lol

 
;D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9I-X_5JtiY
That being said, I am in the minority who found the plot of genetics interesting beyond the dinosaur cloning theme. There may be potential interesting spin-offs with the right direction, I think. Most probably not though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Jun 18, 2022, 01:13:05 PM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 18, 2022, 12:24:38 AMBut these sequences really seem taken from Dino Crisis 2 lol

 
;D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9I-X_5JtiY
That being said, I am in the minority who found the plot of genetics interesting beyond the dinosaur cloning theme. There may be potential interesting spin-offs with the right direction, I think. Most probably not though.

The bit where the Giga smashes the glass and leans in reminded me a LOT of the sequence in DC1 with the T rex.

I also see where you're coming from with the genetic angle, and I thought there was a fair amount in the movie which reminded me of other Michael Crichton works. The problem was that I felt it came at the detriment of the dinosaurs and the story itself.

A movie about genetic manipulation and corporate espionage using genetically modified locusts sounds great. An eco-thriller with taut pacing in the style of Capricorn One would be great. When it's ham-fistedly kludged into a movie about dinosaurs, to the detriment of the movie about dinosaurs, I have issues. I just think the entire plot of Dominion should have been rewritten.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Space_Dementia on Jun 18, 2022, 04:37:56 PM
Here are my thoughts on Dominion...

https://youtu.be/9A-SwuY6BT0
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Jun 19, 2022, 12:56:48 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 17, 2022, 07:55:11 PMOh and Dimetrodons aren't f**king dinosaurs, Colin!

Neither are Dimorphodon, Lystrosaurus, Mosasaurus, Pteranodon and Quetzalcoatlus, so no big deal.

Quote from: Stitch on Jun 17, 2022, 11:54:48 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 17, 2022, 08:04:06 PMOh, and Colin? You do know that the Therizinosaurus was a herbivore, right? Or did you just get your info from Dino Crisis?
It ate vegetation in the movie.

It whacked the deer out of the way to get to some berries (?) I think. So it wasn't exactly hunting Claire, just curious/territorial, but it could've whacked her too if it wanted.

Quote from: Stitch on Jun 18, 2022, 01:13:05 PM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Jun 18, 2022, 12:24:38 AMThat being said, I am in the minority who found the plot of genetics interesting beyond the dinosaur cloning theme. There may be potential interesting spin-offs with the right direction, I think. Most probably not though.

I also see where you're coming from with the genetic angle, and I thought there was a fair amount in the movie which reminded me of other Michael Crichton works. The problem was that I felt it came at the detriment of the dinosaurs and the story itself.

A movie about genetic manipulation and corporate espionage using genetically modified locusts sounds great. An eco-thriller with taut pacing in the style of Capricorn One would be great. When it's ham-fistedly kludged into a movie about dinosaurs, to the detriment of the movie about dinosaurs, I have issues. I just think the entire plot of Dominion should have been rewritten.

The locusts are one thing but I like that they followed through on the Maisie story.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jun 19, 2022, 11:50:49 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 17, 2022, 07:55:11 PMOh and Dimetrodons aren't f**king dinosaurs, Colin!
you do know we've had non-dinosaurs in the series since the beginning right

Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 17, 2022, 08:04:06 PMOh, and Colin? You do know that the Therizinosaurus was a herbivore, right? Or did you just get your info from Dino Crisis?
just do some research on large herbivores doubt you'd like to find yourself before a moose, an elephant, or a rhino

the herbivore = fodder or herbivore = gentle giant that does jackshit is a dudebro thing because people like to see them that way, since they need to be torn apart by "T-rex"
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Jun 29, 2022, 03:59:49 PM
Dominion pretty much happened for this to exist, which I'm fine with -
Spoiler
(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jptoys.com%2Fjptoys%2Fnews%2Fimg%2F2022epicpack.jpg&hash=7264820c890aa39c99cf210b6050f6808c16a8fc)
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: T-850 on Jun 30, 2022, 09:48:16 PM
I've heard so many bad things about Dominion that I'm leery about spending the time/money on it. Is it worth seeing in theaters?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: nanison on Jun 30, 2022, 09:57:41 PM
Why so nervous about it. You know what to expect, it is a dinosaur film. Eat popcorn and enjoy
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Jul 01, 2022, 07:19:20 AM
Quote from: T-850 on Jun 30, 2022, 09:48:16 PMI've heard so many bad things about Dominion that I'm leery about spending the time/money on it. Is it worth seeing in theaters?
Do you like crazy dinosaur action?

If so, go to the movies and have a good time.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 01, 2022, 04:46:54 PM
Quote from: T-850 on Jun 30, 2022, 09:48:16 PMI've heard so many bad things about Dominion that I'm leery about spending the time/money on it. Is it worth seeing in theaters?
no
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Jul 03, 2022, 12:34:21 AM
Quote from: nanison on Jun 30, 2022, 09:57:41 PMWhy so nervous about it. You know what to expect, it is a dinosaur film. Eat popcorn and enjoy

Spoiler
Locust dinosaur movie.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Jul 03, 2022, 12:44:36 AM
Quote from: Omegamorph on Jul 01, 2022, 04:46:54 PM
Quote from: T-850 on Jun 30, 2022, 09:48:16 PMI've heard so many bad things about Dominion that I'm leery about spending the time/money on it. Is it worth seeing in theaters?
no
I'd be inclined to agree. Unless you like locusts.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jul 06, 2022, 05:14:05 AM
Me likey.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4D98f3yhVWw
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jul 07, 2022, 04:09:04 AM
(https://i.ibb.co/52Tx69n/Pics-Art-07-02-07-33-31.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Sabres21768 on Jul 07, 2022, 04:40:02 AM
Quote from: Space_Dementia on Jun 18, 2022, 04:37:56 PMHere are my thoughts on Dominion...

https://youtu.be/9A-SwuY6BT0
Quote from: Stitch on Jun 17, 2022, 11:54:48 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Jun 17, 2022, 08:04:06 PMOh, and Colin? You do know that the Therizinosaurus was a herbivore, right? Or did you just get your info from Dino Crisis?
It ate vegetation in the movie.

It whacked the deer out of the way to get to some berries (?) I think. So it wasn't exactly hunting Claire, just curious/territorial, but it could've whacked her too if it wanted.
[/quote]

It was blind in the movie, so it wasn't hunting anything.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Jul 08, 2022, 12:30:46 AM
How did you know it was blind?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mike’s Monsters on Jul 08, 2022, 12:45:16 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Jul 08, 2022, 12:30:46 AMHow did you know it was blind?

It's eyes were white.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master Chief on Jul 08, 2022, 03:42:28 PM
It had cataracts.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Jul 09, 2022, 02:08:24 PM
This didn't feel much like a jurassic park/world movie to me.

Biosyn storyline could make anyone sleep instantly.

A few interestings trys in directing though.

Spoiler
Mainly Claire ejecting from the plane and hiding from the Therizinosaurus. That one was actually a bit creepy.
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Jul 10, 2022, 02:46:21 PM
Quote from: Mike's Monsters on Jul 08, 2022, 12:45:16 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Jul 08, 2022, 12:30:46 AMHow did you know it was blind?

It's eyes were white.
Huh, I didn't notice that.

Spoiler
It didn't seem to affect its ability to fight the Giganatosaurus at the end of the movie though
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PAS Spinelli on Jul 10, 2022, 06:33:27 PM
Dominion is a very dumb yet fun movie, definitely the JP3 of the JW trilogy
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Jul 10, 2022, 10:04:29 PM
Also doesn't make sense at all how dinosaurs spread all over the world. Did they cross the ocean to travel to europe  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PAS Spinelli on Jul 11, 2022, 08:54:40 PM
Quote from: BigDaddyJohn on Jul 10, 2022, 10:04:29 PMAlso doesn't make sense at all how dinosaurs spread all over the world. Did they cross the ocean to travel to europe  :laugh:
An easy to miss point, but they were spread around via the black market and other companies getting their hands on cloning tech and their DNA
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Jul 11, 2022, 11:58:27 PM
Quote from: PAS Spinelli on Jul 11, 2022, 08:54:40 PM
Quote from: BigDaddyJohn on Jul 10, 2022, 10:04:29 PMAlso doesn't make sense at all how dinosaurs spread all over the world. Did they cross the ocean to travel to europe  :laugh:
An easy to miss point, but they were spread around via the black market and other companies getting their hands on cloning tech and their DNA

But when was this specified in the movie ?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PAS Spinelli on Jul 12, 2022, 12:01:56 AM
Quote from: BigDaddyJohn on Jul 11, 2022, 11:58:27 PM
Quote from: PAS Spinelli on Jul 11, 2022, 08:54:40 PM
Quote from: BigDaddyJohn on Jul 10, 2022, 10:04:29 PMAlso doesn't make sense at all how dinosaurs spread all over the world. Did they cross the ocean to travel to europe  :laugh:
An easy to miss point, but they were spread around via the black market and other companies getting their hands on cloning tech and their DNA

But when was this specified in the movie ?
Shown in the end of Fallen Kingdom, and in the literal dinosaur black market in Malta, also implied when they mention how Atrociraptors were "designer" dinos, and Biosyn literally saying they made most of their dinos
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Jul 12, 2022, 01:04:41 AM
But we see many living free in the wild, how did they get there ? They escaped from the black market and stuff ? That doesn't make much sense IMO.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Jul 12, 2022, 01:07:33 AM
Quote from: BigDaddyJohn on Jul 12, 2022, 01:04:41 AMBut we see many living free in the wild, how did they get there ? They escaped from the black market and stuff ? That doesn't make much sense IMO.
Shh, shhhhhhh, none of that matters, just watch the cool scenes.

I'm saying this as someone who did exactly that.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PAS Spinelli on Jul 12, 2022, 01:55:07 AM
Quote from: BigDaddyJohn on Jul 12, 2022, 01:04:41 AMBut we see many living free in the wild, how did they get there ? They escaped from the black market and stuff ? That doesn't make much sense IMO.
Yeah, they escaped. Dominion is set 4 years after Fallen Kingdom, that's enough time for these growth gene filled dinos to spread and reproduce, with dinosaurs being taken from Sorna too, as well as being cloned by other companies as far back as 2016 (Camp Cretaceous)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: reecebomb on Jul 12, 2022, 07:21:36 AM
Quote from: PAS Spinelli on Jul 10, 2022, 06:33:27 PMDominion is a very dumb yet fun movie, definitely the JP3 of the JW trilogy
Entire JW trilogy is super dumb (in a bad way, thus boring).
Fu*k Trevorrow, starting this trilogy assuming we'll be bored of dinosaurs and giving us this crap instead.

QuoteYeah, they escaped. Dominion is set 4 years after Fallen Kingdom, that's enough time for these growth gene filled dinos to spread and reproduce, with dinosaurs being taken from Sorna too, as well as being cloned by other companies as far back as 2016 (Camp Cretaceous)

Nope, doesn't make much sense, but in Jurassic Worlds cartoon world logic, perhaps.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 15, 2022, 01:51:35 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXtjjSPUUAEEVSa?format=jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Darkness on Jul 17, 2022, 07:18:12 AM
Well, I watched Dominion last night. It was okay, probably my least favourite out of the lot. I think what really hurt it there wasn't really an antagonist dinosaur like the other films. It takes so long for the Giganotosaurus to show up and even then, it just seemed slow when the characters were trying to move around the car. The Malta setpiece with the Velociraptors was fun and the Therizinosaurus was a nice new dinosaur to see with Claire in the swamp. I wish there was more of it. I don't think we needed the old cast at all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Jul 17, 2022, 02:01:04 PM
Too much sillyness in this movie. Again with animals teaming up like humans, again with animals having somewhat human feelings. Dafuq.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Jul 18, 2022, 02:48:07 AM
Quote from: Omegamorph on Jul 15, 2022, 01:51:35 PMhttps://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXtjjSPUUAEEVSa?format=jpg

Megalodon is my favorite dinosaur. I think he could beat that green eyed bastard.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 18, 2022, 09:37:25 AM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Jul 18, 2022, 02:48:07 AMMegalodon is my favorite dinosaur. I think he could beat that green eyed bastard.
nah fam best dinosaur clearly Paraceratherium
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Jul 26, 2022, 04:57:54 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLceoQGfK-c
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on Jul 26, 2022, 05:05:08 AM
I just saw someone on Reddit describe Jurassic World as of Colin Treverrow saw Jaws 3 and took notes thinking it was a Spielberg movie, and damned if that isn't the most accurate description of that movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Razz on Jul 26, 2022, 07:41:36 PM
Haven't seen Dominion yet, can't say I'm in a rush to aswell.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Jul 26, 2022, 10:54:37 PM
Quote from: Razz on Jul 26, 2022, 07:41:36 PMHaven't seen Dominion yet, can't say I'm in a rush to aswell.
you should be as quick as a snail with circulatory issues
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rankles75 on Aug 16, 2022, 03:37:56 AM
Finally got round to watching Dominion, enjoyed it a surprising amount and it's easily the best one since JP2.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: City Hunter Yautja on Aug 16, 2022, 04:15:20 AM
Dominion has some great moments. I do feel leaving out the Prologue was foolish. It adds to the rematch between Giga and Rexy.

The Malta Atrociraptor chase is sublime.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Aug 18, 2022, 03:50:19 AM
Quote from: City Hunter Yautja on Aug 16, 2022, 04:15:20 AMDominion has some great moments. I do feel leaving out the Prologue was foolish. It adds to the rematch between Giga and Rexy.

The Malta Atrociraptor chase is sublime.
Everything in Malta was awesome, highlight of the movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Aug 18, 2022, 04:03:32 AM
The Malta sequence was what I wanted from the rest of the movie, and didn't get.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Aug 18, 2022, 04:34:02 AM
Jack Tenrec must have had a cameo in Malta  8)

Spoiler

(https://s4.gifyu.com/images/gif-13.gif)

[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: T Dog on Aug 18, 2022, 08:44:55 AM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Aug 18, 2022, 04:34:02 AMJack Tenrec must have had a cameo in Malta  8)

Spoiler

(https://s4.gifyu.com/images/gif-13.gif)

[close]
When I heard they were calling the reboot "Jurassic World" I had hoped it was basically going to be Cadillacs and Dinosaurs/Mad Max meets Dawn Of The Planet Of The Apes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Aug 18, 2022, 03:47:41 PM
Quote from: SiL on Jul 26, 2022, 05:05:08 AMI just saw someone on Reddit describe Jurassic World as of Colin Treverrow saw Jaws 3 and took notes thinking it was a Spielberg movie, and damned if that isn't the most accurate description of that movie.
golden comment
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: nanison on Aug 18, 2022, 04:44:12 PM
I like Jaws 3 despite the shoddy special effects
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Aug 18, 2022, 09:05:48 PM
Quote from: nanison on Aug 18, 2022, 04:44:12 PMI like Jaws 3 despite the shoddy special effects
defo a more solid movie than all JWs
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: nanison on Aug 18, 2022, 10:29:32 PM
Quote from: Omegamorph on Aug 18, 2022, 09:05:48 PM
Quote from: nanison on Aug 18, 2022, 04:44:12 PMI like Jaws 3 despite the shoddy special effects
defo a more solid movie than all JWs

I mean it is certainly not a great movie but it had a really fun premise, the underwater scenes and overall set pieces had a lot of potential (that wasn't really fulfilled) I would love it if there was a remake.

Anyway I have yet to see Dominion and I am curious why it is compared with Jaws 3. I'm not harsh on the JW films. I personally liked the second film because it was completely different to the others in the franchise and I saw the fun in it. I mean the set pieces are original and fun, in movies like this I don't really care about a coherent or exciting plot.

I'm not hard to please 😛
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Wompdonkey on Aug 19, 2022, 12:53:22 AM
I think Dominion is a fun movie. It does have some coherency issues with the overall plot that I think could be fixed with a few scenes that were either left out or didn't exist. Compared to Alien, the lore and world-building is very slim in the JP franchise, and I think Dominion does the best job out of all the movies of expanding the world.

Im looking forward to the extended cut we'll be getting for the physical release.

Also for the love of god give us a First-person survival-horror game set on one of the islands when everything goes shit.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: nanison on Aug 19, 2022, 03:12:22 AM
@Wompdonkey

I think your wish should be fulfilled in the coming years, I heard there were more than a handful of dinosaur games in production though none of them are linked to Jurassic Park
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Wompdonkey on Aug 19, 2022, 03:37:40 AM
Quote from: nanison on Aug 19, 2022, 03:12:22 AM@Wompdonkey

I think your wish should be fulfilled in the coming years, I heard there were more than a handful of dinosaur games in production though none of them are linked to Jurassic Park

There are a few games that are bascially the type of game Im talkiing about that Im pretty excited about.

The Lost Wild and Deathground are the two I know of. But it would be so great to have an official one that was given the same respect and  care that Alien: Isolation received.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master Chief on Aug 19, 2022, 05:26:09 PM
Does anyone know how much more footage the extended edition that includes 2 versions of the movie have? I missed the discussion.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Aug 19, 2022, 05:28:13 PM
Quote from: Master Chief on Aug 19, 2022, 05:26:09 PMDoes anyone know how much more footage the extended edition that includes 2 versions of the movie have? I missed the discussion.
Prologue, rex theater scene and some additional stuff. I am reviewing it in 2x as we speak
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: City Hunter Yautja on Aug 19, 2022, 05:59:59 PM
Watched the Extended Version of Dominion. It is superior to theatrical cut in every way. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BlueMarsalis79 on Aug 19, 2022, 09:19:34 PM
Had no idea such a thing even existed.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Aug 19, 2022, 10:24:10 PM
Quote from: Master Chief on Aug 19, 2022, 05:26:09 PMDoes anyone know how much more footage the extended edition that includes 2 versions of the movie have? I missed the discussion.

QuoteFeaturing 14 extra minutes of the film,

https://deadline.com/2022/08/jurassic-world-dominion-extended-cut-coming-to-peacock-next-month-1235096367/
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: nanison on Aug 20, 2022, 02:54:48 AM
@Wompdonkey

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_98LDn9lyFk
I think this was the video where I learned several games are in production
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Wompdonkey on Aug 20, 2022, 05:06:03 AM
Quote from: nanison on Aug 20, 2022, 02:54:48 AM@Wompdonkey

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_98LDn9lyFk
I think this was the video where I learned several games are in production

Awesome! thanks for that. more stuff to hype myself with.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rudiger on Aug 20, 2022, 09:44:58 AM
What fresh hell is this? There's a second cut of Dominion and its longer than the first? Christ, didn't we suffer enough already?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Aug 20, 2022, 02:58:33 PM
Quote from: Rudiger on Aug 20, 2022, 09:44:58 AMWhat fresh hell is this? There's a second cut of Dominion and its longer than the first? Christ, didn't we suffer enough already?
me when I try and watch Domino's (Domino's is Kelly):

(https://www.kotaku.com.au/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2015/06/12/ttqospvryakziwbd0mbp.gif?q=65&w=1280)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Aug 20, 2022, 03:04:53 PM
I love every second with Roland Tembo, even this deleted scene.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bY4y0dOjjNQ
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Aug 20, 2022, 08:01:46 PM
Quote from: City Hunter Yautja on Aug 19, 2022, 05:59:59 PMWatched the Extended Version of Dominion. It is superior to theatrical cut in every way. 
Hmm, I'm intrigued. The original cut was distinctly lacking things, so if the extended is better, I might track it down.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Aug 21, 2022, 09:09:27 AM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Aug 20, 2022, 03:04:53 PMI love every second with Roland Tembo, even this deleted scene.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bY4y0dOjjNQ
Should've been kept in the film

#Releasethespielbergcut
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Highland on Aug 22, 2022, 12:30:34 AM
I watched this last night ( actually it was over 2 days with the kids).

It's not bad, Dino action is pretty good, I don't like how the endings are always somehow big things turning up to fight each other for absolutely no reason, but I suppose that's Jurassic Park  :laugh:

Felt a little bit like the third star wars film or rogue one at the start, where you're just zipping about different places one after the other and the film is basically trying to introduce a three movie plot in 20 minutes.

I think that's the problem with these movies,they'd all benifit from someone sitting down and having a big story to tell over just these one shots with the same people.

Not bad, probably wouldn't watch it again though. Maybe skip to the Dino bits.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master Chief on Aug 23, 2022, 08:49:57 PM
Just noticed on the Peacock channel that the Dominion extended version will be available to stream on September 2nd.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Aug 26, 2022, 11:56:29 PM
This bit in an early draft of the first movie... Chris Pratt antics decades early.  :laugh:

(https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FRZ5OPha.png&hash=7635a9a398691b79b58c0e0e3ab9209b44db8626)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cosmic Incubation on Aug 29, 2022, 05:46:16 PM
Jumping in on this thread for the first time, so sorry if anything I post has been addressed or said before.

Was not a fan of Dominion, but I went back and watched the prologue and was like "why was this cut from the movie?!". The film did not need to be longer, but it certainly would have started off on a much better foot with those scenes left in. The whole sequence of going back in time to show the dinosaurs alive and in their natural habitat (which also ties in with shots/scenes at the end of the film), in a very documentary kind of way, was *chefs kiss*. I'll probably go back and revisit that prologue more than I will the full film lol.

Quote from: Highland on Aug 22, 2022, 12:30:34 AMFelt a little bit like the third star wars film or rogue one at the start, where you're just zipping about different places one after the other and the film is basically trying to introduce a three movie plot in 20 minutes.

I think that's the problem with these movies,they'd all benifit from someone sitting down and having a big story to tell over just these one shots with the same people.

I definitely got a lot of the same vibes as RoS too! I think the whole Jurassic World trilogy is pretty comparable to the Star Wars sequel trilogy as far as generally missing the mark, being an unplanned mess, and being a disappointing more and more with each entry.
I feel like they had more of a plan with Jurassic World, with the end goal being dinos ending up in mainland society, but they just seemed to get cold feet and abandon that in the film that's supposed to bring that idea to fruition. Major disappointment.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Oct 01, 2022, 12:40:37 AM
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Oct 01, 2022, 01:30:30 AM
Quote from: ace3g on Oct 01, 2022, 12:40:37 AMhttps://www.instagram.com/p/CjJMcoeKSP4/
They are gorgeous and I want one
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 01, 2022, 01:34:07 AM
Quote from: Stitch on Oct 01, 2022, 01:30:30 AMThey are gorgeous and I want one
If you can get past the paywall, this is the one time to do it - Mr. Orosco was among the original sculpting & painting crew.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Oct 03, 2022, 06:44:54 PM
Quote from: choccy milk on Oct 01, 2022, 01:34:07 AM
Quote from: Stitch on Oct 01, 2022, 01:30:30 AMThey are gorgeous and I want one
If you can get past the paywall, this is the one time to do it - Mr. Orosco was among the original sculpting & painting crew.
Yeah. Unfortunately I don't have a spare £2000...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Crazy Rich on Oct 03, 2022, 11:53:00 PM
I'd be a beautiful addition to my collection but... $2,866 in Canadian...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elipyQvLoDg
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: OmegaZilla on Oct 06, 2022, 09:38:12 AM
Quote from: Stitch on Oct 03, 2022, 06:44:54 PMYeah. Unfortunately I don't have a spare £2000...
Hah, I can relate. I always see these things and sigh because with that kind of money I would (and should) buy something else  and yet...
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Nov 06, 2022, 10:38:11 PM
(https://subir-imagen.com/images/2022/11/06/2022-11-06-2.png)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sb_zA-hLMO4

lol I loved that Plot twist  ;D

(https://subir-imagen.com/images/2022/11/06/R.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Nov 17, 2022, 01:50:02 AM
Excellent JP trilogy dino style guide & size chart -

https://dinomikemak.weebly.com/paleo-publications.html
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Gilfryd on Nov 23, 2022, 01:23:34 AM
Quote from: Gilfryd on Nov 17, 2022, 01:50:02 AMExcellent JP trilogy dino style guide & size chart -

https://dinomikemak.weebly.com/paleo-publications.html

And here's a video if you don't want the PDF (which has been updated/corrected) -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfYiqeAJEfA
Some other cool videos -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5w0mvCfOa4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUtFa6XUVV8
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: thexenomorph on Nov 24, 2022, 07:11:03 PM
As somebody who loves all of the films, I hope they take a break like between the third and fourth films. That will make the next trilogy even more anticipated for me.

That being said, I hope there is a live action series between now and then, since fourteen years is a long time!  ;D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PAS Spinelli on Nov 24, 2022, 11:52:40 PM
JWE2 is getting another Dominion themed DLC soon, it will be revealed on the 29th and has been teased with Atrociraptor barks on their Twitter
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Nov 25, 2022, 12:31:00 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FLIzwNHCUE
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Nov 27, 2022, 09:30:31 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Aug 26, 2022, 11:56:29 PMThis bit in an early draft of the first movie... Chris Pratt antics decades early.  :laugh:

http://i.imgur.com/RZ5OPha.png
Only just seen this post, 3 months late. That's got to be from Crichton's first draft of the script because that's pretty much taken straight from the novel.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Nov 27, 2022, 10:40:45 PM
Quote from: Stitch on Nov 27, 2022, 09:30:31 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Aug 26, 2022, 11:56:29 PMThis bit in an early draft of the first movie... Chris Pratt antics decades early.  :laugh:

http://i.imgur.com/RZ5OPha.png
Only just seen this post, 3 months late. That's got to be from Crichton's first draft of the script because that's pretty much taken straight from the novel.

I forget if it's the Crichton draft or the Marmo draft.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: razeak on Nov 27, 2022, 10:43:27 PM
I don't know if I chimed in after seeing Dominion at the theater. It's garbage. So bad.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Nov 29, 2022, 02:35:41 PM
Quote from: razeak on Nov 27, 2022, 10:43:27 PMI don't know if I chimed in after seeing Dominion at the theater. It's garbage. So bad.
It is. And yet I've still ordered the Blu-ray. In 3D.

I'm hoping that the extended version, along with the 3D-ness might improve my feelings on it, if only in terms of the wow factor.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cosmic Incubation on Nov 29, 2022, 03:49:34 PM
Quote from: Stitch on Nov 29, 2022, 02:35:41 PM
Quote from: razeak on Nov 27, 2022, 10:43:27 PMI don't know if I chimed in after seeing Dominion at the theater. It's garbage. So bad.
It is. And yet I've still ordered the Blu-ray. In 3D.

I'm hoping that the extended version, along with the 3D-ness might improve my feelings on it, if only in terms of the wow factor.

I know that the prologue scene that was cut from the theatrical cut for some reason is included in the extended version, and is legit better than the rest of the film imo lol.
I feel like if it was included in the theatrical it would have slightly improved my feelings on the film...but probably only slightly.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: nanison on Nov 30, 2022, 12:50:34 AM
A longer film won't make the set pieces more suspenseful, it just adds runtime for characters you already don't care for.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: razeak on Nov 30, 2022, 03:14:53 AM
Owen grabbing the Dilophosaur by the neck........
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PAS Spinelli on Nov 30, 2022, 01:30:00 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwD3YaPV7-o
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Nov 30, 2022, 08:39:25 PM
Quote from: nanison on Nov 30, 2022, 12:50:34 AMA longer film won't make the set pieces more suspenseful, it just adds runtime for characters you already don't care for.
Yeah. Hence why I'm hoping the 3D will bring a thrill, because I know the locusts won't.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mala'kak on Feb 10, 2023, 12:21:57 PM
Man what I would do to get my hands on these...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YN8uAQvnUjg
By the way if anyone is a fan of the toy line and does not know about jptoys.com. You can check this archive here its really cool.

http://www.jptoys.com/toy-database/index.php
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Mala'kak on Mar 09, 2023, 03:16:38 PM
(https://media.entertainmentearth.com/assets/images/6561edc2234444f8b5278219e99431c8xl.jpg)

(https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/61s0e01uMzS._AC_SL1500_.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Mar 17, 2023, 07:34:47 PM
https://twitter.com/hollywoodhandle/status/1636807936063225863
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Mar 26, 2023, 02:26:32 AM
https://twitter.com/GeekTyrant/status/1639815937431060480
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jun 15, 2023, 05:22:04 AM
https://twitter.com/collectjurassic/status/1669062147849027585
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: City Hunter Yautja on Jun 19, 2023, 07:29:08 PM
Quote from: Cosmic Incubation on Nov 29, 2022, 03:49:34 PM
Quote from: Stitch on Nov 29, 2022, 02:35:41 PM
Quote from: razeak on Nov 27, 2022, 10:43:27 PMI don't know if I chimed in after seeing Dominion at the theater. It's garbage. So bad.
It is. And yet I've still ordered the Blu-ray. In 3D.

I'm hoping that the extended version, along with the 3D-ness might improve my feelings on it, if only in terms of the wow factor.

I know that the prologue scene that was cut from the theatrical cut for some reason is included in the extended version, and is legit better than the rest of the film imo lol.
I feel like if it was included in the theatrical it would have slightly improved my feelings on the film...but probably only slightly.

There also is the Rex rampaging the drive in theater that was like in all the promos and ads, but was cut from the theatrical edition..

Still despite the additions, I fall asleep on Dominion 9 out of 10 times I watch it. Its too long with too much schlock.

In other JPwards, I celebrated the 30th Anniversary of the best installment on June 11th.

I also got myself some 30th Anniversary collectables like the Spitter/Dilphosaurus Kenner remake by Hasbro.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Jun 20, 2023, 02:50:52 AM
Quote from: City Hunter Yautja on Jun 19, 2023, 07:29:08 PM
Quote from: Cosmic Incubation on Nov 29, 2022, 03:49:34 PM
Quote from: Stitch on Nov 29, 2022, 02:35:41 PM
Quote from: razeak on Nov 27, 2022, 10:43:27 PMI don't know if I chimed in after seeing Dominion at the theater. It's garbage. So bad.
It is. And yet I've still ordered the Blu-ray. In 3D.

I'm hoping that the extended version, along with the 3D-ness might improve my feelings on it, if only in terms of the wow factor.

I know that the prologue scene that was cut from the theatrical cut for some reason is included in the extended version, and is legit better than the rest of the film imo lol.
I feel like if it was included in the theatrical it would have slightly improved my feelings on the film...but probably only slightly.

There also is the Rex rampaging the drive in theater that was like in all the promos and ads, but was cut from the theatrical edition..

Still despite the additions, I fall asleep on Dominion 9 out of 10 times I watch it. Its too long with too much schlock.

In other JPwards, I celebrated the 30th Anniversary of the best installment on June 11th.

I also got myself some 30th Anniversary collectables like the Spitter/Dilphosaurus Kenner remake by Hasbro.
All of the Kenner remake toys from Mattel are fantastic. I recently got the Red Rex, she rules. The only way they could have improved her would be to include the actual roar the old toy made in the rotation of roars the new toy makes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: City Hunter Yautja on Jun 20, 2023, 03:20:08 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Jun 20, 2023, 02:50:52 AM
Quote from: City Hunter Yautja on Jun 19, 2023, 07:29:08 PM
Quote from: Cosmic Incubation on Nov 29, 2022, 03:49:34 PM
Quote from: Stitch on Nov 29, 2022, 02:35:41 PM
Quote from: razeak on Nov 27, 2022, 10:43:27 PMI don't know if I chimed in after seeing Dominion at the theater. It's garbage. So bad.
It is. And yet I've still ordered the Blu-ray. In 3D.

I'm hoping that the extended version, along with the 3D-ness might improve my feelings on it, if only in terms of the wow factor.

I know that the prologue scene that was cut from the theatrical cut for some reason is included in the extended version, and is legit better than the rest of the film imo lol.
I feel like if it was included in the theatrical it would have slightly improved my feelings on the film...but probably only slightly.

There also is the Rex rampaging the drive in theater that was like in all the promos and ads, but was cut from the theatrical edition..

Still despite the additions, I fall asleep on Dominion 9 out of 10 times I watch it. Its too long with too much schlock.

In other JPwards, I celebrated the 30th Anniversary of the best installment on June 11th.

I also got myself some 30th Anniversary collectables like the Spitter/Dilphosaurus Kenner remake by Hasbro.
All of the Kenner remake toys from Mattel are fantastic. I recently got the Red Rex, she rules. The only way they could have improved her would be to include the actual roar the old toy made in the rotation of roars the new toy makes.

I had the Red Rex preordered and for some reason it fell through. :(

I dig snag a Hammond Collection JPIII Velociraptor.
 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Jun 20, 2023, 04:21:21 AM
Quote from: City Hunter Yautja on Jun 20, 2023, 03:20:08 AM
Quote from: Xenomrph on Jun 20, 2023, 02:50:52 AM
Quote from: City Hunter Yautja on Jun 19, 2023, 07:29:08 PM
Quote from: Cosmic Incubation on Nov 29, 2022, 03:49:34 PM
Quote from: Stitch on Nov 29, 2022, 02:35:41 PM
Quote from: razeak on Nov 27, 2022, 10:43:27 PMI don't know if I chimed in after seeing Dominion at the theater. It's garbage. So bad.
It is. And yet I've still ordered the Blu-ray. In 3D.

I'm hoping that the extended version, along with the 3D-ness might improve my feelings on it, if only in terms of the wow factor.

I know that the prologue scene that was cut from the theatrical cut for some reason is included in the extended version, and is legit better than the rest of the film imo lol.
I feel like if it was included in the theatrical it would have slightly improved my feelings on the film...but probably only slightly.

There also is the Rex rampaging the drive in theater that was like in all the promos and ads, but was cut from the theatrical edition..

Still despite the additions, I fall asleep on Dominion 9 out of 10 times I watch it. Its too long with too much schlock.

In other JPwards, I celebrated the 30th Anniversary of the best installment on June 11th.

I also got myself some 30th Anniversary collectables like the Spitter/Dilphosaurus Kenner remake by Hasbro.
All of the Kenner remake toys from Mattel are fantastic. I recently got the Red Rex, she rules. The only way they could have improved her would be to include the actual roar the old toy made in the rotation of roars the new toy makes.

I had the Red Rex preordered and for some reason it fell through. :(

I dig snag a Hammond Collection JPIII Velociraptor.
 
Check your local targets and the app, all of the Kenner retro stuff is on sale right now.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jul 02, 2023, 11:26:36 PM
https://twitter.com/SophieBlandArt/status/1671921916511223808
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Aug 08, 2023, 05:35:20 PM
https://twitter.com/empiremagazine/status/1688943231059263489

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rz_FvTXa_qY
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Aug 09, 2023, 10:16:46 AM
As one of my favourite films, I'm not sure whether to go or not. I saw it in the cinema on release as a child. I saw it when it was released in 3D. I saw it with a live orchestra. I own it on multiple formats, including 4K.

It's still a fantastic film, I'm just wondering whether my cinematic experience would be better used with new movies.

For anyone whohasn't seen Jurassic Park in the cinema already, then go. Go see it. Why haven't you already?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Aug 09, 2023, 11:21:39 AM
In favor of seeing this in theaters, based on the trailer it looks like they "fixed" the color from the last few home releases. The pink tint that had been added seems to be gone again, with this looking much closer to the 35mm print.

I'm a tad worried they might be overdoing it with the DNR (though it's tough to tell with YouTube's compression) but with the color intact again and just getting to see this movie on the big screen again (I also caught the 3D release in 2014), I absolutely intend to go see this.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Aug 29, 2023, 10:47:12 PM
https://twitter.com/Gizmodo/status/1696635604111364427


https://twitter.com/BDisgusting/status/1696556312342012229
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Sep 01, 2023, 10:13:14 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMMN3NMZW4E
Spoiler
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzblPtingPg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yp7ehzt91ts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4i_T9J2c1w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPaat0mBMDk
[close]
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Eal on Sep 01, 2023, 12:30:28 PM
Quote from: Stitch on Aug 09, 2023, 10:16:46 AMAs one of my favourite films, I'm not sure whether to go or not. I saw it in the cinema on release as a child. I saw it when it was released in 3D. I saw it with a live orchestra. I own it on multiple formats, including 4K.

It's still a fantastic film, I'm just wondering whether my cinematic experience would be better used with new movies.

For anyone whohasn't seen Jurassic Park in the cinema already, then go. Go see it. Why haven't you already?

Anyone remember the collectable cups they had at various fast food places from the day? I remember one with Laura Dern on one side and the raptor on the other. For some reason, that and the scene with the Rex popping out the car roof are the only scenes my 3 year old brain retained from the theater (my parents were pretty irresponsible tbh, or maybe awesome, idk), the rest was on subsequent VHS releases.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Sep 08, 2023, 11:22:57 PM
lol fan-made. Also some stuff look eerily familiar  :laugh:

(https://i.ibb.co/k4ftbx9/Screenshot-20230907-125548-You-Tube.jpg)

(https://i.ibb.co/31nr6XG/Screenshot-20230907-125634-You-Tube.jpg)

(https://i.ibb.co/6bzNQky/Screenshot-20230907-125651-You-Tube.jpg)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0aMYH8r4y4
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Sep 09, 2023, 01:58:51 AM
"Waste of f**kin' ammo..."
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Thatguy2068 on Sep 09, 2023, 03:39:15 AM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Sep 08, 2023, 11:22:57 PMlol fan-made. Also some stuff look eerily familiar  :laugh:

https://i.ibb.co/k4ftbx9/Screenshot-20230907-125548-You-Tube.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/31nr6XG/Screenshot-20230907-125634-You-Tube.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/6bzNQky/Screenshot-20230907-125651-You-Tube.jpg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0aMYH8r4y4
the fact that one of the early Script of Jurassic World actually had The same idea for a human/dino hybrid makes this even more eerie

Edit: Freaking voice to text
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Wweyland on Sep 10, 2023, 11:23:39 AM
The re-release is even reaching the cinemas here (Estonia), it will be a blast.
I think the first movie was never released here in the 90ties.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: T Dog on Sep 10, 2023, 05:27:50 PM
Quote from: Wweyland on Sep 10, 2023, 11:23:39 AMThe re-release is even reaching the cinemas here (Estonia), it will be a blast.
I think the first movie was never released here in the 90ties.

Awesome enjoy!
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: DarthJoker45 on Nov 09, 2023, 10:42:47 PM
https://twitter.com/NetflixGeeked/status/1722729780011745453
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Nov 16, 2023, 03:24:22 AM
https://twitter.com/UniAllAccess/status/1724901470837817612
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cosmic Incubation on Nov 16, 2023, 03:57:23 PM
oof, that artwork
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Nov 16, 2023, 04:57:23 PM
I prefer this lol  ;D

(https://i.ibb.co/tYgYDjN/Warpath-Jurassic-Park.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Nov 17, 2023, 09:45:49 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zh7XTsCU7AQ
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Dec 11, 2023, 04:03:42 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knj3mczbFH4
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: nanison on Dec 11, 2023, 12:08:40 PM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Dec 11, 2023, 04:03:42 AMhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knj3mczbFH4

Very good and excellent ending
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Thatguy2068 on Dec 11, 2023, 02:29:31 PM
What if the dinosaurs on site B are evolving to be more scientifically accurate.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Dec 11, 2023, 03:33:04 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eqJYtFO3SI
Scientists speculate that Tyrannosaurus did not roar, and instead produced sound vibrations similar to modern crocodiles.🤓

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JpvsFKc7EEA
Anyway, someone recreated the Jurassic Park scenes with more accurate dinosaurs.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sb_zA-hLMO4
Edit - There is still no consensus on the final form of Spinosaurus. But we have memes! :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbYzsy2XlEY
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Thatguy2068 on Dec 11, 2023, 03:34:13 PM
Christ all mighty, these are a lot more terrifying.The OG T-Rex roar is great and all, but there's something about these sounds that makes them unnerving.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Dec 11, 2023, 04:22:07 PM
f**k that shit, T-Rex absolutely did roar and it sounded exactly like the one in Jurassic Park. The sound engineers for that movie literally built a Time Machine in real life, and instead of using it to kill Hitler or something, they went back to the Cretaceous period specifically to record T-Rex roars.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Jan 22, 2024, 09:25:31 PM
https://twitter.com/slashfilm/status/1749518455123141068
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Jan 22, 2024, 10:53:55 PM
f**k it, I like Jurassic Park, count me interested.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Jan 22, 2024, 11:05:15 PM
Premium Jurassic Rush
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cougerboy on Jan 23, 2024, 12:35:06 AM
Quote from: Thatguy2068 on Dec 11, 2023, 02:29:31 PMWhat if the dinosaurs on site B are evolving to be more scientifically accurate.

Ah that reminds me of that key scene from Jurassic World, when Masrani condemned Henry Wu for creating an uncontrollable monster in the form of Indominus Rex. Wu retorted he was instructed to do that by Masrani himself, to make the dinos "scarier". A key line by Wu says that none of the dinos in Jurrasic World are "natural" with pure dino DNA. Had their genetic code been "pure", some of them would look quite "different":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vw2duxDy1fM
I thought this was a clever explanation for why the dinos in Jurassic Park did not look scientifically accurate. For example the dinos in Jurassic Park had no (or very few) feathers, when their real dino counterparts did have lots of it (although I know a dino would feature feathers in a later Jurassic movie).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BlueMarsalis79 on Jan 23, 2024, 12:45:54 AM
The explanation existed in the original, frog DNA.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cougerboy on Jan 23, 2024, 12:59:09 AM
Quote from: BlueMarsalis79 on Jan 23, 2024, 12:45:54 AMThe explanation existed in the original, frog DNA.

Yes that is correct, but it wasn't directly linked to why the dinos look different in Jurassic Park (at the time the film was made in 1993, deep research on feathered dinos in the real world was only just beginning). But in Jurassic World that linkage is made specific.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Feb 04, 2024, 09:45:25 PM
Remember this great scene?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Nz8YrCC9X8
Here's the food! ;D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p73kqpqGqqQ
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Feb 05, 2024, 10:42:34 PM
https://twitter.com/DEADLINE/status/1754627564034015449
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rankles75 on Feb 06, 2024, 01:01:18 AM
Where else can they even go with it at this point?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: chrisr232007 on Feb 06, 2024, 01:43:42 AM
I say reboot and follow the books...make it mature and R rated. Time to do something different then what they have the last three movies.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Scott Conover on Feb 06, 2024, 01:56:25 AM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Feb 05, 2024, 10:42:34 PMhttps://twitter.com/DEADLINE/status/1754627564034015449

Happy for all the Hobbs & Shaw and Bullet Train heads out there, but I really think this sucks ass. The dude has become the king of making soulless movies that your coworker loves for a month and that you eventually watch three years later on a plane and never think about it again. The dude is Ryan Reynolds-core incarnate.

NGL if Leitch got his hands on an alien movie I think I'd end it all.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Feb 06, 2024, 03:34:26 AM
Quote from: Scott Conover on Feb 06, 2024, 01:56:25 AM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Feb 05, 2024, 10:42:34 PMhttps://twitter.com/DEADLINE/status/1754627564034015449

Happy for all the Hobbs & Shaw and Bullet Train heads out there, but I really think this sucks ass. The dude has become the king of making soulless movies that your coworker loves for a month and that you eventually watch three years later on a plane and never think about it again. The dude is Ryan Reynolds-core incarnate.

NGL if Leitch got his hands on an alien movie I think I'd end it all.
Granted I'm not sure his resume is appropriate for a JP movie, but Bullet Train, Deadpool 2, and John Wick are fantastic.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 06, 2024, 01:02:01 PM
John Wick is great, but given the directions that Chad Stahelski and David Leitch's careers have gone in separately after that movie, I think I'm most comfortable putting a lot of the success of that film on Stahelski rather than Leitch. I'm not a Leitch guy at all; his new one, The Fall Guy, sounds like something that on paper I'd love all the individual parts of, but every time I see that trailer play before a movie at the theater I just find it to be insufferable.

Also, can't help but to be turned off by the super quick turnaround with the July 2025 release date here, too. Those poor VFX artists. And Leitch isn't even 100% on board yet, so either the VFX team hasn't started working yet and it's going to be a ton of crunch for them, or they have started working without a director properly in place, and that means this is going to go the Marvel route of a director jumping in and having a bunch of pre-viz stuff already done for him but overseen by someone else that he has no control over and has to work around/incorporate. Both are... not great options!

I was a bit optimistic about this when Koepp was announced as the writer, and who knows, maybe it might wind up being something good, but this latest bit of news has that excitement waning. I'll go in with an open mind and maybe I'll be surprised, but for now the hype just isn't there.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Feb 06, 2024, 10:30:05 PM
Quote from: chrisr232007 on Feb 06, 2024, 01:43:42 AMI say reboot and follow the books...make it mature and R rated. Time to do something different then what they have the last three movies.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MyyHEVmn8bE

meh! Better a prequel focused on Eddy...

(https://i.ibb.co/QDWStZ9/JP-Volunteer-Boy.jpg)


that or a big buget adaptation of

(https://i.ibb.co/4KWWj6D/61-A5epku-NLL-AC-UF1000-1000-QL80.jpg)

(https://i.ibb.co/QpN3vhR/Screenshot-20240206-193211-Chrome.jpg)

(https://i.ibb.co/QcvxR0c/Dinotopia-LAFT-cover.jpg)

(https://i.ibb.co/QD5D6jn/Land-Before-Time-characters.jpg)

(https://s13.gifyu.com/images/SCReI.gif)

(https://i.ibb.co/D5PDqVP/static-assets-upload2494773374429244197.png)

(https://i.ibb.co/C5WnVXv/Xenozoic-Tales-Dark-Horse01.jpg)

(https://i.ibb.co/YQp3T7F/71-YPbv-P6-KIL-AC-UF1000-1000-QL80.jpg)

(https://i.ibb.co/YpBsx8v/p-dinosaur-19874-effe1545.jpg)

(https://i.ibb.co/RpxnKWL/Adele-Blanc-sec-Louise-Bourgoin-Luc-Besson.jpg)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 09, 2024, 06:01:16 PM
https://twitter.com/THR/status/1756008693962011098
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Feb 09, 2024, 06:19:22 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 09, 2024, 06:01:16 PMhttps://twitter.com/THR/status/1756008693962011098

I like Leitch, didn't want him for this. It's funny... this morning I said that Dan Trachtenberg is really who I want for this but as of a few minutes ago he is working on two new Predator lives  :laugh:

The article mentions the talks fell through over differing visions. I do hope that means Universal doesn't want another loud action movie.. and I hope they hire someone really interesting for this. Gareth Edwards or Gina Prince-Blythewood would be really cool.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Feb 09, 2024, 07:10:48 PM
That was fast.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Feb 09, 2024, 07:33:57 PM
Indeed :o👍
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 09, 2024, 07:38:07 PM
My guess is that this...

Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 06, 2024, 01:02:01 PMor they have started working without a director properly in place, and that means this is going to go the Marvel route of a director jumping in and having a bunch of pre-viz stuff already done for him but overseen by someone else that he has no control over and has to work around/incorporate.

...did indeed wind up being the case. It has to be the case, if they really do want to get this thing out by July of next year. It also means that they probably aren't going to get a really interesting, innovative filmmaker to come on board, because there's going to be very little room to for them to bring anything of their own to the table. They want a hired gun to go on set and execute their vision and call it a day.

Hell, if that's the case, get Bryce Dallas Howard to direct. She's done some really solid work on The Mandalorian in a tight timeframe, working with material she was handed, and she already has connection to this franchise on the other side of the camera.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: PAS Spinelli on Feb 09, 2024, 07:43:10 PM
I think the novel stinks to be quite honest
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Xenomrph on Feb 09, 2024, 11:46:41 PM
Quote from: PAS Spinelli on Feb 09, 2024, 07:43:10 PMI think the novel stinks to be quite honest
Jurassic Park?

The novel owns.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Rankles75 on Feb 10, 2024, 11:02:26 AM
Isn't Hammond a complete douchebag in the novel who gets killed in the end?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on Feb 10, 2024, 11:04:09 AM
Quote from: Rankles75 on Feb 10, 2024, 11:02:26 AMIsn't Hammond a complete douchebag in the novel who gets killed in the end?
Unrepentant arsehole who gets eaten by compies.

I prefer the movie to the book, but I liked the book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: skhellter on Feb 10, 2024, 11:59:43 AM
Quote from: PAS Spinelli on Feb 09, 2024, 07:43:10 PMI think the novel stinks to be quite honest

it's trashy and messy.

so, hey, it's a michael crichton book.

Therefore it's also compelling and weird and pretty well put together entertainment.

One of the best airport novels ever made.

I appreciate how it's a lot more mean than spielberg's movie.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: 426Buddy on Feb 10, 2024, 12:05:05 PM
I like novel also. The movie ranks higher but the book has a nice horror vibe to it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: skhellter on Feb 10, 2024, 12:14:48 PM
the compies and the baby...

The Dilo and Nedry..

the T-Rex reveal

great horror setpieces.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Feb 20, 2024, 03:08:44 PM
I love the book. It's my joint favourite book.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Feb 21, 2024, 12:34:55 AM
'Jurassic World': Gareth Edwards Tapped To Direct New Movie For Universal And Amblin


https://deadline.com/2024/02/jurassic-world-gareth-edwards-1235831353/

QuoteAfter a deal couldn't be made for David Leitch to direct, Universal Pictures and Amblin Entertainment have moved fast as the studio is in final negotiations for Rogue One director Gareth Edwards to helm a new Jurassic World movie. The studio recently dated the pic to bow on July 2, 2025 and moved fast to find a director with Edwards spending all of last week meeting with execs. After impressing producers Steven Spielberg and Frank Marshall, who helped launch the franchise in the 90s, an offer soon followed and pre-production is expected to ramp up once a deal is sealed.

The new movie will be a completely fresh take on a Jurassic era with Jurassic World castmembers Chris Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard not expected to return, nor the original trilogy's thespians Jeff Goldblum, Laura Dern and Sam Neill. David Koepp penned the script.

I LOVE this choice.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 21, 2024, 12:53:57 AM
Significantly more interesting filmmaker than Leitch, like the two aren't even close to comparable. Hope he gets to do really do his thing here, because if he's not kept on a leash he'd be a great pick for one of these.

I'd be lying if I says I wasn't more than a bit worried based on his comments during The Creator's press tour about not wanting to jump back into franchise filmmaking any time soon, though. Hope this isn't a last resort thing for him after The Creator bombed, especially after seeing the way this Jurassic project is seemingly being micromanaged and rushed into a way-too-soon release date.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Feb 21, 2024, 01:05:32 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 21, 2024, 12:53:57 AMSignificantly more interesting filmmaker than Leitch. Hope he gets to do really do his thing here.

A bit worried based on his comments after The Creator about not wanting to jump back into franchise filmmaking any time soon, though. Hope this isn't a last resort thing for him after The Creator bombed, especially after seeing the way this Jurassic World project is seemingly being micromanaged.

Report says he's been meeting with Spielberg and Frank Marshall over the last week or so and he really impressed them. You have to imagine a guy like Edwards loves that original Jurassic Park.

Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 21, 2024, 01:13:20 AM
Quote from: MudButt on Feb 21, 2024, 01:05:32 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 21, 2024, 12:53:57 AMSignificantly more interesting filmmaker than Leitch. Hope he gets to do really do his thing here.

A bit worried based on his comments after The Creator about not wanting to jump back into franchise filmmaking any time soon, though. Hope this isn't a last resort thing for him after The Creator bombed, especially after seeing the way this Jurassic World project is seemingly being micromanaged.

Report says he's been meeting with Spielberg and Frank Marshall over the last week or so and he really impressed them. You have to imagine a guy like Edwards loves that original Jurassic Park.



Oh for sure he does, I've seen him riffing on it affectionately in Godzilla. :laugh:

Edwards + Koepp... they could be cooking here. I just really hope they push that release date back.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Feb 21, 2024, 05:44:43 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 21, 2024, 01:13:20 AM
Quote from: MudButt on Feb 21, 2024, 01:05:32 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 21, 2024, 12:53:57 AMSignificantly more interesting filmmaker than Leitch. Hope he gets to do really do his thing here.

A bit worried based on his comments after The Creator about not wanting to jump back into franchise filmmaking any time soon, though. Hope this isn't a last resort thing for him after The Creator bombed, especially after seeing the way this Jurassic World project is seemingly being micromanaged.

Report says he's been meeting with Spielberg and Frank Marshall over the last week or so and he really impressed them. You have to imagine a guy like Edwards loves that original Jurassic Park.



Oh for sure he does, I've seen him riffing on it affectionately in Godzilla. :laugh:

Edwards + Koepp... they could be cooking here. I just really hope they push that release date back.

Universal seems dead set on it. Per THR they want cameras rolling in June. The trades have said the script is locked in and they've already done a bunch of pre-vis & design work. They were really
just looking for a shooter to come in and film the script.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Retropocalypse on Feb 21, 2024, 12:44:42 PM
Gareth will smash it! He's a fantastic director and has genuine passion for his projects.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 21, 2024, 01:05:50 PM
I really, really like Gareth, I'm just... timid here. A, because it doesn't seem like he's going to have the flexibility to conceive this project from the ground up, given how far along it already seems to be and how close the release date is, and B, because as The Creator was coming out he was very adamant during that press tour about not wanting to return to franchise filmmaking any time soon.

It seems that The Creator's financial failure might have left him in a place where he really can't be picky. I think he's an excellent choice for a Jurassic movie, but I also don't want to see him become a director for hire.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Feb 21, 2024, 05:34:34 PM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 21, 2024, 01:05:50 PMI really, really like Gareth, I'm just... timid here. A, because it doesn't seem like he's going to have the flexibility to conceive this project from the ground up, given how far along it already seems to be and how close the release date is, and B, because as The Creator was coming out he was very adamant during that press tour about not wanting to return to franchise filmmaking any time soon.

It seems that The Creator's financial failure might have left him in a place where he really can't be picky. I think he's an excellent choice for a Jurassic movie, but I also don't want to see him become a director for hire.

I think that's why talks fell through with Leitch. Universal isn't looking for an auteur, they want a shooter. I am a little nervous that they are trying to make a release date which is 15 months away but it sounds like they have a completed script and are excited by the take David Koepp came up with. Perhaps if this one works really well for them Gareth will have more input in a potential sequel.

Clearly if Gareth felt like he didn't want to return to franchise filmmaking but signed on to this.. it could be a sign that he's excited by the script. It could also mean he's got to take a job because his last movie didn't do well financially.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Feb 21, 2024, 06:53:12 PM
The Creator was mostly boring, so maybe studio oversight is what he needs.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 21, 2024, 06:55:40 PM
QuotePollock acquiesced. Spielberg planned to edit Jurassic Park from Europe, but privately sought stateside help with its sound mixing. His solution has never previously been reported.

SPIELBERG I called George [Lucas, Spielberg's longtime friend and occasional collaborator]. I said, "George, I'm in trouble. The studio's really upset with me that I'm going to not mix Jurassic Park and go off to Europe and make Schindler's List. Would you mix Jurassic Park?" I already had his mixers working on the film, so George said he'd take over. And he and Kathy Kennedy mixed the film.

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-features/schindlers-list-oral-history-steven-spielberg-liam-neeson-1235830436/

Well holy shit. What an insanely cool detail to learn.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 22, 2024, 03:01:14 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pgSGrvYLbU
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Feb 22, 2024, 05:19:45 AM
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 22, 2024, 03:01:14 AMhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pgSGrvYLbU

Sounds like he was excited by the pitch and the chance to work with Speilberg and Co.

Definitely makes me more optimistic  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SM on Feb 22, 2024, 05:27:32 AM
So if they've done Jurassic Park and Jurassic World - next is obviously...

Jurassic Moon.

Gimme my damn cheque.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Feb 22, 2024, 05:43:46 AM
I mistakenly first read the announcement as "Gareth Evans" and got excited at the idea of dinos doing martial arts.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Feb 22, 2024, 06:16:07 AM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Feb 22, 2024, 05:43:46 AMI mistakenly first read the announcement as "Gareth Evans" and got excited at the idea of dinos doing martial arts.

Think we almost had the diet version of this with David Leitch  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: razeak on Feb 22, 2024, 06:37:17 PM
Oh. I thought this series was going to hibernate for a while. I thought World was a good first step, and it fell into utter trash by the time we got to Dominion.

The Alien/Raptor scenes in Kingdom were fun.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 22, 2024, 09:40:32 PM
I actually like Fallen Kingdom the best of the recent three. It's dumb, but with some genuinely cool setpieces (especially in the mansion) and Bayona's directing is the best the series has seen since Spielberg.

The first Jurassic World looks like a car commercial to me.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: aliens13 on Feb 22, 2024, 10:38:17 PM
Quote from: razeak on Feb 22, 2024, 06:37:17 PMOh. I thought this series was going to hibernate for a while. I thought World was a good first step, and it fell into utter trash by the time we got to Dominion.

The Alien/Raptor scenes in Kingdom were fun.
I liked Dominion, specially the Extended Cut and I think that is the best of the World trilogy, but still it has to many issues. I also throughout that the series was going to hibernate some time
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: nanison on Feb 22, 2024, 11:35:09 PM
Fallen kingdom is the best of the "new" trilogy for me. It had a unique setting and atmosphere and thus it didn't feel like I had seen it all before.

World was good but on 2nd and third watch you just get bored by all the fan service

Dominion was some kind of James Bond or superhero globe trotting adventure, I didn't like it.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Feb 26, 2024, 09:11:16 PM
Quote from: nanison on Feb 22, 2024, 11:35:09 PMFallen kingdom is the best of the "new" trilogy for me. It had a unique setting and atmosphere and thus it didn't feel like I had seen it all before.

World was good but on 2nd and third watch you just get bored by all the fan service

Dominion was some kind of James Bond or superhero globe trotting adventure, I didn't like it.
I agree. I liked the horror vibes.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cougerboy on Feb 27, 2024, 02:14:55 AM
Do we have any idea what this Edwards directed Jurassic film will be? Another sequel? A reboot? Or something entirely different?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Feb 27, 2024, 06:37:51 AM
Quote from: Cougerboy on Feb 27, 2024, 02:14:55 AMDo we have any idea what this Edwards directed Jurassic film will be? Another sequel? A reboot? Or something entirely different?

We don't have an official synopsis yet. The trades indicate it'll be a reboot of sorts. None of the prior cast is expected to return but it will still live in the continuity of the previous movies. Just a whole new story.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Feb 27, 2024, 06:44:38 AM
I wonder how many Springsteen lyrics Koepp will work into the script. The Lost World's screenplay described Roland as having "skin like leather and the diamond hard look of a cobra."  :laugh:
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Mar 14, 2024, 02:02:40 AM
https://twitter.com/TheInSneider/status/1768094768045969697
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: T Dog on Mar 14, 2024, 10:46:57 AM
Quote from: SM on Feb 22, 2024, 05:27:32 AMSo if they've done Jurassic Park and Jurassic World - next is obviously...

Jurassic Moon.

Gimme my damn cheque.

I had always hoped that Jurassic World would mean the planet was overun with Dinosaurs, just like Cadillacs and Dinosaurs, but naaaaaah they were just another shit 3 movies in the series to go along with 1 and 2 halves good movies (1 is solid, 2&3 are half good movies).
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Wweyland on Mar 14, 2024, 11:57:04 AM
Jurassic Universe would not be out of the question.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Master Chief on Mar 14, 2024, 02:28:50 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Mar 14, 2024, 02:02:40 AMhttps://twitter.com/TheInSneider/status/1768094768045969697
Is this good or bad? This announcement left me feeling apathetic. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Mar 14, 2024, 06:54:43 PM
I think ScarJo can make some pretty interesting choices for projects but I don't know how I feel about her being in this franchise. I do think she's pretty talented though, especially recently.

I've seen/heard some buzz saying this movie is being described as Escape from New York with Dinos.  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Mar 14, 2024, 07:31:17 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Mar 14, 2024, 06:54:43 PMI've seen/heard some buzz saying this movie is being described as Escape from New York with Dinos.  8)

Now that sounds interesting. Weird, but interesting.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Mar 14, 2024, 07:35:55 PM
Quote from: Stitch on Mar 14, 2024, 07:31:17 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Mar 14, 2024, 06:54:43 PMI've seen/heard some buzz saying this movie is being described as Escape from New York with Dinos.  8)

Now that sounds interesting. Weird, but interesting.

Yeah. There's been talk that Universal is trying to scale down costs and make the movie smaller than the last few so perhaps it's more of a survival film. I'd prefer that honestly. Lean into the thriller/horror elements.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Mar 14, 2024, 08:33:20 PM
Jurassic World: Under the Scales
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: nanison on Mar 14, 2024, 11:29:36 PM
Scaling down costs and casting Johansson doesn't mix well. She probably a very hefty pay check.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Mar 15, 2024, 06:01:43 AM
Quote from: nanison on Mar 14, 2024, 11:29:36 PMScaling down costs and casting Johansson doesn't mix well. She probably a very hefty pay check.

I don't think the movie will be cheap. It just won't cost as much as Dominion's 300 million dollar budget.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Cougerboy on Mar 15, 2024, 10:52:32 AM
Quote from: MudButt on Mar 14, 2024, 07:35:55 PM
Quote from: Stitch on Mar 14, 2024, 07:31:17 PM
Quote from: MudButt on Mar 14, 2024, 06:54:43 PMI've seen/heard some buzz saying this movie is being described as Escape from New York with Dinos.  8)

Now that sounds interesting. Weird, but interesting.

Yeah. There's been talk that Universal is trying to scale down costs and make the movie smaller than the last few so perhaps it's more of a survival film. I'd prefer that honestly. Lean into the thriller/horror elements.

So long as they do it better than "65". "65" had an interesting premise for the dinosaur film genre, but the execution was terrible, and the movie just sucked so bad as a result. Such a waste of an interesting idea.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: irn on Mar 15, 2024, 04:57:58 PM
Anyone else annoyed how the franchise gets called Jurassic World now and not Jurassic Park in media?
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Mar 15, 2024, 10:34:52 PM
Yes
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Mar 21, 2024, 09:55:06 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyXhkgBracg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ww8doPPZWA0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EM43PILyFlQ
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Stitch on Mar 22, 2024, 12:50:32 AM
Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Mar 21, 2024, 09:55:06 PMhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyXhkgBracg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ww8doPPZWA0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EM43PILyFlQ
They are really well done
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: MudButt on Mar 25, 2024, 04:00:03 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Mar 14, 2024, 02:02:40 AMhttps://twitter.com/TheInSneider/status/1768094768045969697

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/scarlett-johansson-new-jurassic-world-movie-1235856099/

Trades are now confirming it. Looks like ScarJo is joining  8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Mar 25, 2024, 05:07:09 PM
She drives around Sorna picking up raptors in a van.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Mar 25, 2024, 06:40:12 PM
Tier news 8)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BlueMarsalis79 on Mar 25, 2024, 09:51:26 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Mar 25, 2024, 05:07:09 PMShe drives around Sorna picking up raptors in a van.

 :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: E. Shaw on Mar 25, 2024, 10:04:42 PM
Quote from: KiramidHead on Mar 25, 2024, 05:07:09 PMShe drives around Sorna picking up raptors in a van.

A reason Fallen Kingdom had no emotional strings for me is when they said "save the dinos!," because Nublar is going to have Volcanic Extinction event that will wipe out dinosaurs from earth! I am like, uh Sorna has dinosaurs on it.. so.. not really a big deal.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: nanison on Mar 26, 2024, 10:50:55 AM
I wonder why they need to attach big expensive names to films such as this. The selling point are the dinosaurs not the actors. Get young aspiring actors, people will come and see it either way.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BlueMarsalis79 on Mar 26, 2024, 01:32:18 PM
I mean got to be real, I did not bother with anything after Jurassic World because I found it underwhelming, Scarlett Johansson and a new creative team might make it worth seeing.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: E. Shaw on Mar 26, 2024, 03:36:04 PM
I have confess that I really am not excited for any more JP/JW films. I fall asleep almost every viewing of Dominion; those locusts put me to sleep. :D
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: aliens13 on Mar 26, 2024, 06:11:39 PM
Quote from: E. Shaw on Mar 26, 2024, 03:36:04 PMI have confess that I really am not excited for any more JP/JW films. I fall asleep almost every viewing of Dominion; those locusts pit me to sleep. :D
Me too, I was really excited for Dominion and it was a huge disappointment for me. I think that this movie will fail hard
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: irn on Mar 26, 2024, 07:27:04 PM
Dominion was like they took scenes from about 5 completely different films and stiched them together.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Mar 26, 2024, 07:47:09 PM
Quote from: nanison on Mar 26, 2024, 10:50:55 AMI wonder why they need to attach big expensive names to films such as this. The selling point are the dinosaurs not the actors. Get young aspiring actors, people will come and see it either way.

(https://s12.gifyu.com/images/SVvnp.gif)

I like dinosaurs though👀👉👈

🐲🐓
(https://s12.gifyu.com/images/SVvnW.gif)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: E. Shaw on Mar 26, 2024, 07:52:49 PM
Quote from: aliens13 on Mar 26, 2024, 06:11:39 PM
Quote from: E. Shaw on Mar 26, 2024, 03:36:04 PMI have confess that I really am not excited for any more JP/JW films. I fall asleep almost every viewing of Dominion; those locusts pit me to sleep. :D
Me too, I was really excited for Dominion and it was a huge disappointment for me. I think that this movie will fail hard

They need to get back to the Crichton horror roots, "theme park monsters." (Alan Grant, JPIII)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: aliens13 on Mar 26, 2024, 08:39:55 PM
Quote from: E. Shaw on Mar 26, 2024, 07:52:49 PM
Quote from: aliens13 on Mar 26, 2024, 06:11:39 PM
Quote from: E. Shaw on Mar 26, 2024, 03:36:04 PMI have confess that I really am not excited for any more JP/JW films. I fall asleep almost every viewing of Dominion; those locusts pit me to sleep. :D
Me too, I was really excited for Dominion and it was a huge disappointment for me. I think that this movie will fail hard

They need to get back to the Crichton horror roots, "theme park monsters." (Alan Grant, JPIII)
They won't do that, since the first JW it's obvious that they are focusing in the more younger audiences and then you see the pet called Blue, the T Rex being an hero, the dinosaurs in general even less animals and more monsters (or in the case like the Sinoceratops or Stygimoloch comic relif). I can't see the OG trilogy and the JW trilogy and think that they are the same universe, and I don't going to talk about Camp Cretaceous. That show it's beyond of ridiculous
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Mar 26, 2024, 09:19:13 PM
(https://i.ibb.co/Zx3qCV5/n-Qlbkn-T3-400x400-1.png)

(https://s9.gifyu.com/images/SVvgz.gif)

After this movie, Guillermo Del Toro should do a Victorian-looking Jurassik Park reboot and add stuff like a dinosaur hunter with steampunk tech⚙️👀👉👈

(https://s12.gifyu.com/images/SVvgs.gif)

(https://s12.gifyu.com/images/SVvgH.gif)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: E. Shaw on Mar 26, 2024, 09:36:04 PM
Quote from: aliens13 on Mar 26, 2024, 08:39:55 PM
Quote from: E. Shaw on Mar 26, 2024, 07:52:49 PM
Quote from: aliens13 on Mar 26, 2024, 06:11:39 PM
Quote from: E. Shaw on Mar 26, 2024, 03:36:04 PMI have confess that I really am not excited for any more JP/JW films. I fall asleep almost every viewing of Dominion; those locusts pit me to sleep. :D
Me too, I was really excited for Dominion and it was a huge disappointment for me. I think that this movie will fail hard

They need to get back to the Crichton horror roots, "theme park monsters." (Alan Grant, JPIII)
They won't do that, since the first JW it's obvious that they are focusing in the more younger audiences and then you see the pet called Blue, the T Rex being an hero, the dinosaurs in general even less animals and more monsters (or in the case like the Sinoceratops or Stygimoloch comic relif). I can't see the OG trilogy and the JW trilogy and think that they are the same universe, and I don't going to talk about Camp Cretaceous. That show it's beyond of ridiculous

I agree. JW has turned into Godzilla's Monsterverse with match ups and smash downs. The exception was the first JW, with that scene of the raptor (Charlie or Delta) tearing into the InGen soldier as he yells at Claire to leave in her hospital vehicle, the blood flying on the window and his death cries was so good! I also thought The Indominus Rex despite ripping off Toho mutation ideas was creepy and horror worthy. Why Trevorrow said the Giganotosaurus in Dominion was The Joker makes no sense, Indominus was The Joker, it wanted to see the whole Jurassic World burn or well more accurately covered in his teeth and claw marks.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: nanison on Mar 26, 2024, 10:12:39 PM
Well ok then if you all think Scarlett is necessary for this franchise then so be it.
I hope they make it worthwhile and do a Hitchcock and kill her off violently halfway through
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: E. Shaw on Mar 26, 2024, 10:15:43 PM
Quote from: nanison on Mar 26, 2024, 10:12:39 PMWell ok then if you all think Scarlett is necessary for this franchise then so be it.
I hope they make it worthwhile and do a Hitchcock and kill her off violently halfway through

That's cold. :p
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BlueMarsalis79 on Mar 26, 2024, 10:21:49 PM
(https://i.makeagif.com/media/3-16-2015/se0tnB.gif)

Pictured Scarjo with Nanison.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: aliens13 on Mar 26, 2024, 10:28:44 PM
Quote from: E. Shaw on Mar 26, 2024, 09:36:04 PM
Quote from: aliens13 on Mar 26, 2024, 08:39:55 PM
Quote from: E. Shaw on Mar 26, 2024, 07:52:49 PM
Quote from: aliens13 on Mar 26, 2024, 06:11:39 PM
Quote from: E. Shaw on Mar 26, 2024, 03:36:04 PMI have confess that I really am not excited for any more JP/JW films. I fall asleep almost every viewing of Dominion; those locusts pit me to sleep. :D
Me too, I was really excited for Dominion and it was a huge disappointment for me. I think that this movie will fail hard

They need to get back to the Crichton horror roots, "theme park monsters." (Alan Grant, JPIII)
They won't do that, since the first JW it's obvious that they are focusing in the more younger audiences and then you see the pet called Blue, the T Rex being an hero, the dinosaurs in general even less animals and more monsters (or in the case like the Sinoceratops or Stygimoloch comic relif). I can't see the OG trilogy and the JW trilogy and think that they are the same universe, and I don't going to talk about Camp Cretaceous. That show it's beyond of ridiculous

I agree. JW has turned into Godzilla's Monsterverse with match ups and smash downs. The exception was the first JW, with that scene of the raptor (Charlie or Delta) tearing into the InGen soldier as he yells at Claire to leave in her hospital vehicle, the blood flying on the window and his death cries was so good! I also thought The Indominus Rex despite ripping off Toho mutation ideas was creepy and horror worthy. Why Trevorrow said the Giganotosaurus in Dominion was The Joker makes no sense, Indominus was The Joker, it wanted to see the whole Jurassic World burn or well more accurately covered in his teeth and claw marks.
Even worst they give the Giganotosaurus an more animal-like behaviour but an monster-like design, the Giga didn't do anything to be the antagonist of the movie... Another wasted opportunity. And speaking of wasted opportunity's, we have the OG trio back and they only use them to make jokes. I always say that Dominion for me it's the best of the JW trilogy but some days I really hate that movie

Quote from: Immortan Jonesy on Mar 26, 2024, 09:19:13 PM
(https://i.ibb.co/Zx3qCV5/n-Qlbkn-T3-400x400-1.png)

(https://s9.gifyu.com/images/SVvgz.gif)

After this movie, Guillermo Del Toro should do a Victorian-looking Jurassik Park reboot and add stuff like a dinosaur hunter with steampunk tech⚙️👀👉👈

(https://s12.gifyu.com/images/SVvgs.gif)

(https://s12.gifyu.com/images/SVvgH.gif)

What a cool image that one of the Megalosaurus "Victorian Jurassic Park". I always love to read The Lost World of Arthur Conan Doyle, and the depictions of the dinosaurs back in the day
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: E. Shaw on Mar 26, 2024, 10:33:55 PM
Quote from: aliens13 on Mar 26, 2024, 10:28:44 PM
Quote from: E. Shaw on Mar 26, 2024, 09:36:04 PM
Quote from: aliens13 on Mar 26, 2024, 08:39:55 PM
Quote from: E. Shaw on Mar 26, 2024, 07:52:49 PM
Quote from: aliens13 on Mar 26, 2024, 06:11:39 PM
Quote from: E. Shaw on Mar 26, 2024, 03:36:04 PMI have confess that I really am not excited for any more JP/JW films. I fall asleep almost every viewing of Dominion; those locusts pit me to sleep. :D
Me too, I was really excited for Dominion and it was a huge disappointment for me. I think that this movie will fail hard

They need to get back to the Crichton horror roots, "theme park monsters." (Alan Grant, JPIII)
They won't do that, since the first JW it's obvious that they are focusing in the more younger audiences and then you see the pet called Blue, the T Rex being an hero, the dinosaurs in general even less animals and more monsters (or in the case like the Sinoceratops or Stygimoloch comic relif). I can't see the OG trilogy and the JW trilogy and think that they are the same universe, and I don't going to talk about Camp Cretaceous. That show it's beyond of ridiculous

I agree. JW has turned into Godzilla's Monsterverse with match ups and smash downs. The exception was the first JW, with that scene of the raptor (Charlie or Delta) tearing into the InGen soldier as he yells at Claire to leave in her hospital vehicle, the blood flying on the window and his death cries was so good! I also thought The Indominus Rex despite ripping off Toho mutation ideas was creepy and horror worthy. Why Trevorrow said the Giganotosaurus in Dominion was The Joker makes no sense, Indominus was The Joker, it wanted to see the whole Jurassic World burn or well more accurately covered in his teeth and claw marks.
Even worst they give the Giganotosaurus an more animal-like behaviour but an monster-like design, the Giga didn't do anything to be the antagonist of the movie... Another wasted opportunity. And speaking of wasted opportunity's, we have the OG trio back and they only use them to make jokes. I always say that Dominion for me it's the best of the JW trilogy but some days I really hate that movie

Yeah the OG cast doesn't shine except for Ian Malcom when he delivers, "you rapacious rat b*st*rd!" line. The Extended Edition is much better, having the Jurassic Period Prolouge and Rexy at the drive in, which was featured in so many trailers and commercials but did not make the theatrical cut. I also like Blue attacking hunters in the snow. 
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: aliens13 on Mar 26, 2024, 10:41:01 PM
Quote from: E. Shaw on Mar 26, 2024, 10:33:55 PM
Quote from: aliens13 on Mar 26, 2024, 10:28:44 PM
Quote from: E. Shaw on Mar 26, 2024, 09:36:04 PM
Quote from: aliens13 on Mar 26, 2024, 08:39:55 PM
Quote from: E. Shaw on Mar 26, 2024, 07:52:49 PM
Quote from: aliens13 on Mar 26, 2024, 06:11:39 PM
Quote from: E. Shaw on Mar 26, 2024, 03:36:04 PMI have confess that I really am not excited for any more JP/JW films. I fall asleep almost every viewing of Dominion; those locusts pit me to sleep. :D
Me too, I was really excited for Dominion and it was a huge disappointment for me. I think that this movie will fail hard

They need to get back to the Crichton horror roots, "theme park monsters." (Alan Grant, JPIII)
They won't do that, since the first JW it's obvious that they are focusing in the more younger audiences and then you see the pet called Blue, the T Rex being an hero, the dinosaurs in general even less animals and more monsters (or in the case like the Sinoceratops or Stygimoloch comic relif). I can't see the OG trilogy and the JW trilogy and think that they are the same universe, and I don't going to talk about Camp Cretaceous. That show it's beyond of ridiculous

I agree. JW has turned into Godzilla's Monsterverse with match ups and smash downs. The exception was the first JW, with that scene of the raptor (Charlie or Delta) tearing into the InGen soldier as he yells at Claire to leave in her hospital vehicle, the blood flying on the window and his death cries was so good! I also thought The Indominus Rex despite ripping off Toho mutation ideas was creepy and horror worthy. Why Trevorrow said the Giganotosaurus in Dominion was The Joker makes no sense, Indominus was The Joker, it wanted to see the whole Jurassic World burn or well more accurately covered in his teeth and claw marks.
Even worst they give the Giganotosaurus an more animal-like behaviour but an monster-like design, the Giga didn't do anything to be the antagonist of the movie... Another wasted opportunity. And speaking of wasted opportunity's, we have the OG trio back and they only use them to make jokes. I always say that Dominion for me it's the best of the JW trilogy but some days I really hate that movie

Yeah and OG cast doesn't shine except for Ian Malcom when he delivers, "you rapacious rat b*st*rd!" line. The Extended Edition is much better, habing the Jurassic Period Prolouge and Rexy at the drive in, which was featured in so many trailers and commercials but did not make the theatrical cut. I also like Blue attacking hunters in the snow. 
Yes, the extended cut it's a big improvement. I think that the extended cut was the theatrical version at first but they cut it down because the movie it will be to long, and that's why the theatrical cut that we saw in cinemas feels very weird and incomplete. Having saying that, while I liked the prologue, it always bothered me that they mixed dinosaurs of different ages and places together. For a paleonerd like me it's hard to see an T Rex and a Giganotosaurus livings together when in reality there's a gap of almost 40 million of years between them, and even different continents. But it's a movie, not a documentary so I can forgive that. I reeeeally loved the Oviraptor design
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: E. Shaw on Mar 26, 2024, 10:52:11 PM
Quote from: aliens13 on Mar 26, 2024, 10:41:01 PM
Quote from: E. Shaw on Mar 26, 2024, 10:33:55 PM
Quote from: aliens13 on Mar 26, 2024, 10:28:44 PM
Quote from: E. Shaw on Mar 26, 2024, 09:36:04 PM
Quote from: aliens13 on Mar 26, 2024, 08:39:55 PM
Quote from: E. Shaw on Mar 26, 2024, 07:52:49 PM
Quote from: aliens13 on Mar 26, 2024, 06:11:39 PM
Quote from: E. Shaw on Mar 26, 2024, 03:36:04 PMI have confess that I really am not excited for any more JP/JW films. I fall asleep almost every viewing of Dominion; those locusts pit me to sleep. :D
Me too, I was really excited for Dominion and it was a huge disappointment for me. I think that this movie will fail hard

They need to get back to the Crichton horror roots, "theme park monsters." (Alan Grant, JPIII)
They won't do that, since the first JW it's obvious that they are focusing in the more younger audiences and then you see the pet called Blue, the T Rex being an hero, the dinosaurs in general even less animals and more monsters (or in the case like the Sinoceratops or Stygimoloch comic relif). I can't see the OG trilogy and the JW trilogy and think that they are the same universe, and I don't going to talk about Camp Cretaceous. That show it's beyond of ridiculous

I agree. JW has turned into Godzilla's Monsterverse with match ups and smash downs. The exception was the first JW, with that scene of the raptor (Charlie or Delta) tearing into the InGen soldier as he yells at Claire to leave in her hospital vehicle, the blood flying on the window and his death cries was so good! I also thought The Indominus Rex despite ripping off Toho mutation ideas was creepy and horror worthy. Why Trevorrow said the Giganotosaurus in Dominion was The Joker makes no sense, Indominus was The Joker, it wanted to see the whole Jurassic World burn or well more accurately covered in his teeth and claw marks.
Even worst they give the Giganotosaurus an more animal-like behaviour but an monster-like design, the Giga didn't do anything to be the antagonist of the movie... Another wasted opportunity. And speaking of wasted opportunity's, we have the OG trio back and they only use them to make jokes. I always say that Dominion for me it's the best of the JW trilogy but some days I really hate that movie

Yeah and OG cast doesn't shine except for Ian Malcom when he delivers, "you rapacious rat b*st*rd!" line. The Extended Edition is much better, habing the Jurassic Period Prolouge and Rexy at the drive in, which was featured in so many trailers and commercials but did not make the theatrical cut. I also like Blue attacking hunters in the snow. 
Yes, the extended cut it's a big improvement. I think that the extended cut was the theatrical version at first but they cut it down because the movie it will be to long, and that's why the theatrical cut that we saw in cinemas feels very weird and incomplete. Having saying that, while I liked the prologue, it always bothered me that they mixed dinosaurs of different ages and places together. For a paleonerd like me it's hard to see an T Rex and a Giganotosaurus livings together when in reality there's a gap of almost 40 million of years between them, and even different continents. But it's a movie, not a documentary so I can forgive that. I reeeeally loved the Oviraptor design

 
I'd have cut out most of Locust arch, and kept those scenes. The Prologue is the only thing that makes Rexy versus Giga have some weight, that there is literal bad blood between them because of their ancestors; still though, the fight feels so forced and pointless to the narrative.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: nanison on Mar 26, 2024, 11:00:17 PM
For what it's worth I have absolutely nothing against ScarJo, I just don't get her inclusion.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: SiL on Mar 26, 2024, 11:49:08 PM
You could say that about any actor not in the franchise being attached.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Mar 28, 2024, 03:29:13 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZMLpmBwQf4
https://twitter.com/EW/status/1773369157171511300

https://twitter.com/DreamWorksTV/status/1773386061026078848
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: aliens13 on Mar 29, 2024, 01:12:38 AM
Looks interesting, I was let down after Season 4 and 5 of CC but I will give this show a chance. It's good that they are using the Atrociraptor, a lot of the new Dominion dinos had very little screen time. I hope to see more of the Pyroraptor
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: E. Shaw on Mar 30, 2024, 02:23:49 AM
Looking forward to the Jurassic Park Classic Game Collection:

(https://i0.wp.com/limitedgamenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/jurassic-park-classic-games-collection-standard-edition-physical-retail-release-esrb-us-limited-run-games-playstation-4-playstation-5-nintendo-switch-xbox-series-x-www.limitedgamenews.com_-scaled.webp?ssl=1)
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Huntsman on Apr 01, 2024, 08:08:34 AM
I'd be interested in a Scarlett led JP movie especially if it was Trespasser influenced, and set during the 90s on Sorna. I highly doubt that will happen though.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: E. Shaw on Apr 01, 2024, 03:33:10 PM
Quote from: ace3g on Mar 28, 2024, 03:29:13 PMhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZMLpmBwQf4
https://twitter.com/EW/status/1773369157171511300

https://twitter.com/DreamWorksTV/status/1773386061026078848

That poster with the Carnivore mouth looks very much like Alien Romulus poster.. hmmm...

(https://ew.com/thmb/LeBWYM6F03PTwaHWBBHT7ECAD_c=/1500x0/filters:no_upscale():max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/Jurassic-World-Chaos-Theory-Poster-032724-7c7e4c8d79064a09af4743e036112e8d.jpg)

(https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/proxy/-UB_afeODEtW2FRRovT3eAzIkyVxxk68WFqMfIi6dHT-AQuTtsalAknrn2gZ_gXuAyKPp-GIIeuyBHMy0V4ozilwosKZvLoVNcQ)

I am referring to position of jaw, saliva, and color.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on Apr 01, 2024, 08:58:45 PM
https://twitter.com/ATRightMovies/status/1774768683925360763
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: ace3g on Apr 16, 2024, 01:07:25 AM
https://twitter.com/krolljvar/status/1780036214764257666
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Nightmare Asylum on Apr 30, 2024, 12:45:39 PM
https://twitter.com/JurassicOutpost/status/1785066837220221278

Huh, very shocked that it isn't Greig Fraser or Oren Soffer.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: KiramidHead on Apr 30, 2024, 02:05:50 PM
I guess Cundey is still in the dog house after Jack and Jill.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: BigDaddyJohn on Apr 30, 2024, 05:56:29 PM
As long as f**king Trevorrow isn't involved, I can be interested.
Title: Re: Jurassic Park Series
Post by: Immortan Jonesy on May 01, 2024, 09:55:15 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bLgUKAAKyQw
Quote from: NerdistSet six years after the events at Camp Cretaceous, members of "The Nublar Six" are struggling to find their footing off the islands, navigating a world now filled with dinosaurs and people who want to hurt them. Reunited in the wake of a tragedy, the group comes together only to find themselves on the run and catapulted into a global adventure to unravel a conspiracy that threatens dinosaur and humankind alike and finally learn the truth about what happened to one of their own.

https://twitter.com/nerdist/status/1785537826479636793
Text only | Text with Images