Quote from: Valaquen on Feb 26, 2015, 03:31:51 PMIt's one of the things Cameron didn't like but couldn't overcome due to the needed sensitivity.Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Feb 26, 2015, 03:22:08 PM
The grain was still quite noticeable in it though? From what I recall.
Yeah, but film grain is a beautiful thing. I don't like to see it artifically removed if it's part of the film's visual makeup. The details were intact and then some and the screen has a gritty overcoat. I love it.
QuoteQuestions were posed to the floor, most of them being asked by me and Ian labeling me a "trouble-maker" due to this and one question I asked. Now I remembered a report that came out around the time of the Anthology set in which Jean-Pierre Jeunet was reported as claiming he had no involvement in the Anthology set. I asked Charles about this and he said that it wasn't true, that Junet had been involved. I'll try and find the link to that report to hopefully back me up. But as I told Charles, "I'll just shut my mouth then".
Quote from: Mr. Weyland on Mar 01, 2015, 01:54:28 AMI was disappointed that the same amount of effort was not done with the restoration of Alien 3 and Resurrection, regardless if they are better films or not, they are both still visually amazing to look at.
Quote from: Son Of Kane on Mar 01, 2015, 02:38:34 AMQuote from: Mr. Weyland on Mar 01, 2015, 01:54:28 AM
I think Alien, just slightly a bit better than ALIENS, just a bit. I was disappointed that the same amount of effort was not done with the restoration of Alien 3 and Resurrection, regardless if they are better films or not, they are both still visually amazing to look at. I always thought of these films ass pieces of art with a story.
Resurrection is ass alright.
Quote from: Mr. Weyland on Mar 01, 2015, 01:54:28 AM
I think Alien, just slightly a bit better than ALIENS, just a bit. I was disappointed that the same amount of effort was not done with the restoration of Alien 3 and Resurrection, regardless if they are better films or not, they are both still visually amazing to look at. I always thought of these films ass pieces of art with a story.
Quote from: Valaquen on Feb 26, 2015, 03:31:51 PMQuote from: Corporal Hicks on Feb 26, 2015, 03:22:08 PM
The grain was still quite noticeable in it though? From what I recall.
Yeah, but film grain is a beautiful thing. I don't like to see it artifically removed if it's part of the film's visual makeup. The details were intact and then some and the screen has a gritty overcoat. I love it.
Quote from: Corporal Hicks on Feb 26, 2015, 03:22:08 PM
The grain was still quite noticeable in it though? From what I recall.