Quote from: BishopShouldGo on Jul 27, 2017, 10:57:18 PM
Yeah, you're not allowed to like all three and it's a constant war I guess.
Quote from: SM on Jul 26, 2017, 11:14:57 PMQuote from: Gash on Jul 26, 2017, 10:53:03 PM
It makes sense to me that Piranha 2 is not Cameron, because in all honestly I'd rather watch a cheap and lousy film like that than an expensive lousy film like Titanic. Neither script impresses so... um... Titanic's got some pretty FX, Piranha 2's got some tits. Tits win.
Titanic has tits as well.
Quote from: Gash on Jul 26, 2017, 10:53:03 PM
It makes sense to me that Piranha 2 is not Cameron, because in all honestly I'd rather watch a cheap and lousy film like that than an expensive lousy film like Titanic. Neither script impresses so... um... Titanic's got some pretty FX, Piranha 2's got some tits. Tits win.
Quote from: Gash on Jul 26, 2017, 10:53:03 PM
It makes sense to me that Piranha 2 is not Cameron, because in all honestly I'd rather watch a cheap and lousy film like that than an expensive lousy film like Titanic. Neither script impresses so... um... Titanic's got some pretty FX, Piranha 2's got some tits. Tits win.
Quote from: HuDaFuK on Jul 26, 2017, 08:27:36 AMQuote from: PierreVW on Jul 25, 2017, 09:44:19 PMHis debut was the awful PIRANHAS 2.
As SiL said, crediting him for that - and using it to criticise him, as you seem to be doing - is pretty stupid. He was an FX guy who was suddenly promoted to director when the original guy was fired, and even then he was simply a front under the complete control of the film's producer - he wasn't even allowed to see any of the footage he shot, much less oversee it's editing. It can hardly be considered a Cameron movie.
Not to mention he's personally mocked what a terrible movie it was on numerous occasions.
Quote from: PierreVW on Jul 25, 2017, 09:44:19 PMHis debut was the awful PIRANHAS 2.
Quote from: PierreVW on Jul 25, 2017, 09:44:19 PMQuote from: Perfect-Organism on Jul 24, 2017, 10:24:14 PMQuote from: Gash on Jul 24, 2017, 04:31:55 AMQuote from: LCpl. D. Grant on Jun 15, 2017, 02:31:37 AM
Cameron only had one big film under his belt (The Terminator) when he directed Aliens.
It shows.
Aliens by James Cameron was as close to a perfect movie you can get. Every scene is memorable.
The same is true with ALIEN(Ridley Scott). It was his 2nd film too. His perfect debut was THE DUELLISTS(1977).
ALIENS was the 3rd of Cameron. His second was the original Terminator. His debut was the awful PIRANHAS 2.
Quote from: Perfect-Organism on Jul 24, 2017, 10:24:14 PMQuote from: Gash on Jul 24, 2017, 04:31:55 AMQuote from: LCpl. D. Grant on Jun 15, 2017, 02:31:37 AM
Cameron only had one big film under his belt (The Terminator) when he directed Aliens.
It shows.
Aliens by James Cameron was as close to a perfect movie you can get. Every scene is memorable.
Quote from: Gash on Jul 24, 2017, 04:31:55 AMQuote from: LCpl. D. Grant on Jun 15, 2017, 02:31:37 AM
Cameron only had one big film under his belt (The Terminator) when he directed Aliens.
It shows.
Quote from: Gash on Jul 24, 2017, 04:31:55 AMIt shows.