Quote from: Born Of Cold Light on Mar 13, 2015, 03:32:49 AM
Having documentary-style parts could be awesome if done right and something new for the Alien series.
Quote from: Intrepid-Traveler on Mar 13, 2015, 12:47:50 AM
Really can't think of any cons, other than he might try to change Alien life cycle design with new creatures/designs like that toothy facehugger.
Quote from: The Eighth Passenger on Mar 12, 2015, 04:08:47 PMQuote from: marrerom on Mar 10, 2015, 02:53:06 AM
Con:
3) each film he's made has been worse then the last.Quote from: marrerom on Mar 11, 2015, 02:38:30 AM
I just saw it [Chappie] and I really liked it. Its his second best film and it has given me more confidence in his ability to create Alien 5
https://s3.amazonaws.com/monsterguide/images/5/raised%20eyebrow.jpg
Quote from: Perfect-Organism on Mar 12, 2015, 02:54:03 AMThat stroke me too! Has it been more balanced in ambiance tone, inter-cutting clean and dirty sceneries, I'd appreciate it better. Elysium has the balance in that relation.
As a con, hmmm, well sometimes his films get a bit too gross. I just couldn't stand the squalor and grossness of D9 but I guess it was par for the course.
Quote from: Perfect-Organism on Mar 12, 2015, 02:54:03 AM
I think I haven't read anywhere here yet about the portrayal of "The Company" in Chappie. Blomkamp struck the perfect balance of characteristics which the company had to make it evil, yet not evil. There were no evil motivations in the company. They were behaving like every corporation out there, and yet they were evil.
Quote from: marrerom on Mar 10, 2015, 02:53:06 AM
Con:
3) each film he's made has been worse then the last.
Quote from: marrerom on Mar 11, 2015, 02:38:30 AM
I just saw it [Chappie] and I really liked it. Its his second best film and it has given me more confidence in his ability to create Alien 5
Quote from: marrerom on Mar 10, 2015, 02:53:06 AMSummed it up damn well. Plus Blomkamp seems to be one sadistic director, this movie will probably rock if he hires a decent writer.
Pro:
1) Excellent directing of action scenes and "world creation".
2) Ability to attract A list actors to his films.
3) Very good eye for special effects work.
Con:
1) bad at writing yet insists on writing his own scripts.
2) gets carried away with "concepts" and loses focus on creating decent characters.
3) each film he's made has been worse then the last.
Quote from: marrerom on Mar 10, 2015, 02:53:06 AM
Pro:
1) Excellent directing of action scenes and "world creation".
2) Ability to attract A list actors to his films.
3) Very good eye for special effects work.
Con:
1) bad at writing yet insists on writing his own scripts.
2) gets carried away with "concepts" and loses focus on creating decent characters.
3) each film he's made has been worse then the last.