Quote from: S.E.B. on Sep 01, 2024, 11:35:09 PMAfter A:ROM, I'm fully embracing the idea of a stand-alone take on the Alien franchise and universe, not bound to fan service and whatnot. Just like how the Fargo show barely had anything to do with FARGO the movie, I hope that ALIEN: EARTH will do the same thing with the Alien franchise and universe. That is, as long as Hawley captures the atmosphere and vibe of the first three Alien movies.
I'm totally down for standalone movies with no connection to any other movie in the franchise. The problem is modern audiences; there is a desperate, *desperate* need to have their hand held, everything explained and all dots spelled out and connected (like, folk can't even just watch a movie and form an opinion anymore, they need to watch some random 20-something year old on YouTube making videos titled "[Insert movie title here] Explained!" Where they proceed to listen to someone talk through what they have just watched, which was painfully straightforward and obvious by just watching the movie itself). Have you visited the LV426 subreddit? Someone mentioned Kay was pregnant to her cousin and there were several comments along the lines of "this wasn't implied, if it was it wasn't done very well!" (Clearly an on-screen diagram was required, the two separate scenes alluding to this were apparently insufficient for some).
I think this makes standalone movies difficult.. you can't just have mysteries anymore sadly.. start a movie like one of the Alien 40th anniversary shorts with people randomly happening upon eggs, and immediately it'll be "how did they get there??", promptly followed by "David did it!!" And "this proves AvP is canon" fights etc.. it'd just be pure bedlam... you can't just have something like we were presented in 1979 like an alien ship with an unknown corpse and left to use your imagination... you'd have to have cave painting or pictorials, someone looking at it and narrating it as matter of fact to walk you through it (as per the AvP predator hunt flashbacks) 😅
Rook provided this role in Romulus (albeit it wasn't done bad)... why? Because if we'd just left the masses to use their minds in what was being presented you'd get a scenario like 'Prometheus' where they cry fowl because "black goo wasn't explained so the movie doesn't make sense!" (even though the whole point of the movie was stealing fire from the gods, and thus we aren't really meant as humans to understand the fire we were playing with; a point lost on many).
So whilst I am down for standalones (and actually think those kinds of movies would be greatly beneficial) the amount of handholding required to appease the casual viewer would be more effort than simply directly referencing and tying in to a past movie complete with a shared music cue to really hammer it home, sadly. 😅
For me, I'd love something new, but similar to 'Alien' in that we don't know what to expect.. I think the neomorph was a misfire from a design point of view, but I also don't believe we have to have the exact same creature every time; some of the concept art for Covenant's facehugger-like creatures resembling isopods were so damn cool, believable looking creatures that you might see in an aquarium.. it's criminal that we didn't get to see those designs on screen ; I'd like it if it went beyond our expectations of how we "think" a life cycle of creature should behave and took us out of our comfort zone again /kept us guessing, and really bring back the horror.