Latest News

Predator: Badlands Box Office Drops 68% In Second Weekend

The box office figures for Predator: Badlands‘ second weekend at theatres have been released. The film opened with a franchise-best domestic debut of $40 million, easily topping the chart in its first weekend. However, in its second weekend, it recorded a steep decline, dropping 68% in its second weekend with takings of $13 million, placing it third domestically behind Now You See Me: Now You Don’t and The Running Man.

This drop gives it a domestic total of $66.3 million, already surpassing the unadjusted lifetime domestic gross of the original Predator ($59.7M). It has earned a solid $70 million from overseas markets, bringing its global total to $136.3 million. While a second-weekend drop in the 65-70% range is generally considered sharp for a high-profile blockbuster, it is worth noting that the crossover film Alien vs Predator experienced a similar second-weekend decline of 67.6% back in 2004.

More recently, last year’s Alien: Romulus dropped 61% in its second weekend but went on to achieve a successful final gross. Alien: Romulus was just a little bit higher at the same point and ended up earning $350 million globally despite being R-rated.

Dek carries Thia on his back. Predator: Badlands Box Office Drops 68% In Second Weekend

Thia & Dek

Predator: Badlands is a huge success, creatively and commercially, for the franchise. Its current domestic total of $66.3 million means Predator: Badlands is already the highest-grossing solo Predator film domestically (unadjusted for inflation). The film’s strong audience reception, evidenced by a ‘Certified Fresh’ score of 85% from critics and a 95% from audiences, along with an A- CinemaScore, suggests strong “word-of-mouth” that could mitigate future losses.

Here’s a comparison table with the box office totals of previous Predator films:


Movie Title Release Date Production Budget Domestic Box Office Worldwide Box Office Worldwide Box Office (Adjusted for Inflation)
Predator Jun 12, 1987 $18.0M $59.7M $98.3M $285M
Predator 2 Nov 21, 1990 $35.0M $30.7M $54.8M $145M
AVP: Alien Vs. Predator Aug 13, 2004 $70.0M $80.3M $172.5M $295M
Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem Dec 25, 2007 $40.0M $41.8M $128.9M $199M
Predators Jul 9, 2010 $40.0M $52.0M $127.2M $170M
The Predator Sep 14, 2018 $88.0M $51.0M $159.5M $205M
Prey Aug 5, 2022 $65.0M N/A N/A N/A
Predator: Killer of Killers Jun 6, 2025 $50.0M N/A N/A N/A
Predator: Badlands Nov 7, 2025 $105.0M $66.3M $136M TBD

The film, directed by Dan Trachtenberg and starring Elle Fanning in the dual roles of synthetics Thia and Tessa cost $105 million. It will need to make at least $250 million to turn a profit for the studio. As you can see, Predator: Badlands‘ $66.3 million domestic total beats every other Predator film except Alien vs Predator. However, it’s a very different story if you take inflation into account and there’s some way to go to catch the rest.

It is still unknown what director Dan Trachtenberg has next lined up in the Predator franchise. Prey 2 is supposed to be in development and sees the return of Amber Midthunder as Naru. Perhaps, we may get a direct sequel to Predator: Badlands if this one does well.

Keep your browsers locked on Alien vs. Predator Galaxy for the latest Predator: Badlands news! You can follow us on Facebook, X, Instagram and YouTube to get the latest on your social media walls. You can also join in with fellow Alien and Predator fans on our forums. Want to support what we do here at AvP Galaxy and get exclusive perks while doing so? Check out our Patreon!



Post Comment

Comments: 216
« Newer Comments 12345 Older Comments »
  1. Xenotaris
    Quote from: SiL on Dec 10, 2025, 09:45:44 PMPrey could easily be a third person stealth-based survival horror deal  - as Naru you start hunting animals in the forest while slowly realising the Predator is around. Alternating levels with the Feral Predator as he also works his way up the food chain, but these are more action-oriented levels, not survival horror. Could either be done as alternating levels or an AvP-style choose-your-perspective.
    Thank you.
  2. SiL
    Prey could easily be a third person stealth-based survival horror deal  - as Naru you start hunting animals in the forest while slowly realising the Predator is around. Alternating levels with the Feral Predator as he also works his way up the food chain, but these are more action-oriented levels, not survival horror. Could either be done as alternating levels or an AvP-style choose-your-perspective.
  3. Xenotaris
    Quote from: BigDaddyJohn on Dec 10, 2025, 01:50:11 PM
    Quote from: Xenotaris on Dec 10, 2025, 11:48:03 AM
    Quote from: BigDaddyJohn on Dec 10, 2025, 11:34:44 AMclassical third person action game
    Hmmm thats a broad category there, are we talking action-adventure like Tomb Raider or Uncharted? A survival horror game either via Fixed Camera or Over-the-Shoulder? or a Third Person Shooter like Saints Row and GTA?

    Well some scenes in KoK could fit with a God Of War type of game, for example.
    I can see that.


    I didn't get a chance to really play God of War during its heyday since it came out after my PS2 broke and by then we went to the Xbox.


    Quote from: SiL on Dec 10, 2025, 01:02:28 PMNo
    Why not? I don't understand videogame-coded. Thats not a slang I am familiar with. You must have thought of a video game in mind when you said that.

    Badlands can be an Action RPG

    KOK can be a God of War-style game.

    What game would Prey be like is all I am asking


    Here is my proposed Predator RPG

    https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=69464.0

    I will add more stuff once I think about it longer.
  4. BigDaddyJohn
    Quote from: Xenotaris on Dec 10, 2025, 11:48:03 AM
    Quote from: BigDaddyJohn on Dec 10, 2025, 11:34:44 AMclassical third person action game
    Hmmm thats a broad category there, are we talking action-adventure like Tomb Raider or Uncharted? A survival horror game either via Fixed Camera or Over-the-Shoulder? or a Third Person Shooter like Saints Row and GTA?

    Well some scenes in KoK could fit with a God Of War type of game, for example.
  5. PredBabe
    Quote from: BigDaddyJohn on Dec 09, 2025, 12:47:53 PMI'm sorry if some people don't understand the masterful crafting of the first movie, the pacing, tension building, directing, unique creature, all of this that inspired other movies afterwards and achieved legendary status.

    Badlands will inspire nothing. No one will ever take it as a reference for other movies. In a few years it will already be mostly forgotten, just as Kok already is.

    Agreed with you about the original movie.
    Though I do think Badlands could inspire more movies as well as other mediums with similar storylines where a Predator is the main character. I'm especially hoping it ignites the chance for a video game based around this concept.
  6. Mr.Turok
    Quote from: BigDaddyJohn on Dec 09, 2025, 09:44:44 AM
    Quote from: Mr.Turok on Dec 09, 2025, 02:16:15 AM
    Quote from: BigDaddyJohn on Dec 08, 2025, 03:52:54 PMFirst and foremost, Dek can be replaced by a human knight/warrior, another alien creature from star wars trying to prove himself etc... It would change very little in the actual movie, thus not having a point in being a predator movie.

    PG13 is a business choice, that's supposed to bring more money in, which softens the movie.

    CGI fest, just like every this era blockbuster (and that no one can deny eye to eye), what's really different about this one, comparing it to Star Wars, Avatar etc ?

    Also Dan's a great idea siphoner, but that's not his ideas. Numerous nice visual or else ideas are blatantly taken from elsewhere.

    Few examples the blood revealing camouflaged predator in Prey ripped from... The Predator (lol), the grappling scorpion weapon from Kok was also in The Predator before, the dangerous planet with wild fauna ripped off the Avatar planet, I cannot believe he didn't took it from there.

    If he wants to work on other IP's so bad which is obvious now (star wars, mad max etc) well he should do it.

    Some of these I can understand to a slight degree, like I would have liked Badlands to be a bit more grittier myself, but the "great idea siphoner" comment is where I am a bit lost. Can you elaborate further on why this is even a bad thing? My mind always goes back to how "art cannot exist in a vacuum and is always influenced by other forces, as nothing is truly original when you really look deep into it", when I read that. Of course ideas will be inspired by other ideas, that's part of the creative process, unless I am misunderstanding.

    Like saying the grappling scorpion weapon getting ripped off from The Predator seems like its saying every Predator movie that used a plasmacaster is unoriginal because it's ripping off from the first film. It's just part of the arsenal.

    Everyone is inspired by something else, I agree. That's even a good thing I'd say. But there is being inspired and there is tastelessly rip off something. I think Dan has done the latter too many times for my taste.

    When you directly copy and paste an idea, usually it shows.
    The grappling hook is minor and not the best example I concede, but the rest is not.

    Also the fan fiction aspect of some of his other ideas is through the roof I'm sorry to say.

    Well I even say even with the example of Feral covered in blood is still one I raise an eyebrow at. It's not meant to be as the big reveal to us, but rather the story's conveyance of how utterly powerful Feral is as the narrative's Goliath as is Naru to the narrative's David. It takes to what JH and CH did in their respective scenes of them ripping out the spines of Billy and Jerry for trophies; predatory beings from the stars roaring to the heavens in a display of pure power and dominance over the local lifeforms, and elevates it to a higher bloody level with Predator that really reveals in its gorey act of glory. It's an act that is very in line with what a Predator would do. Personally, I also love how this upscales the Predator's feat of strength in films, where they basically are strong enough not only to kill a bear in one punch but at least deadlift 400-700lb on average. Puts in context to how much JH really was toying with Dutch.

    Besides that, I think the one thing where I can agree with the fan fiction aspect is the new alternate ending to KoK. I'm still not too sure about having the survivors being abducted and thrown all in a combat arena. I do like all three of his movies so far, so I'm hoping that this ending has a promising follow up. I still would have liked it if it was going to follow up on Naru being hunted by a younger Greyback but we're far from that now.
  7. newagescamartist
    I can't think of a single instance where any Predator movie has surpassed that moment where Jungle Hunter sets the bomb and laughs hysterically. I still get goosebumps every single time I watch it. The original movie is genius. I just can't gush about it enough. When I talk to friends that haven't seen it yet I'm just like you guys have no idea how awesome this thing is from beginning to end. They don't make 'em like that anymore.
  8. Wweyland
    I still think the Predator series would be a better fit for Neil Marshall-esque, lower-budget, low-CGI, and real locations movie. Prey was similar to that, but should have had a theatrical release.
  9. BigDaddyJohn
    I'm sorry if some people don't understand the masterful crafting of the first movie, the pacing, tension building, directing, unique creature, all of this that inspired other movies afterwards and achieved legendary status.

    Badlands will inspire nothing. No one will ever take it as a reference for other movies. In a few years it will already be mostly forgotten, just as Kok already is.
  10. Xenotaris
    Quote from: BigDaddyJohn on Dec 08, 2025, 03:52:54 PM
    Quote from: Mr.Turok on Dec 08, 2025, 01:39:11 AM
    Quote from: solace97 on Dec 07, 2025, 05:34:11 AM
    Quote from: Mr.Turok on Dec 07, 2025, 05:22:46 AM
    Quote from: solace97 on Dec 05, 2025, 05:05:38 PM
    Quote from: PredBabe on Dec 05, 2025, 07:55:31 AMTheir bitterness towards the 1987 Predator movie is an interesting take.


    I've noticed a becoming trend to just absolutely shit on the actual good installments of either franchise as of late. Or severely downplay them.
    Because old timers couldn't stop saying how Badlands isn't an exemplary Predator film like the first one. Lots of people even in here had done this to talk about how Prey, KoK, and Badlands are not real Predator films like the first.
    I consider myself an old timer, and while I enjoyed badlands I think it's a far cry to call it an exemplary film.
    Minor grammar mistake, fixed it.  I meant that many keep using the first film as only what a real exemplary Predator film really is compared to the new films.

    Quote from: BigDaddyJohn on Dec 07, 2025, 12:53:30 PMOld timer/young timer is a silly thing. You love the movies or you don't.

    Badlands is a predator movie that betrays what the creature is.

    Dan apparently wanted to make another movie, with other IP's, it's so visible it's sometimes funny to watch. I'm not sure making a Predator movie was his main priority.
    I know you didn't want to explain your thoughts on the film, but I am curious to see what went wrong in your eyes. I never thought that it went side ways, just that simply it is purposely a different film that is meant apart from the usual formula that we have been familiar with for decades and the leap is paying off big time. If anything, I do wonder if it would have reached a similar positive acclaim if it went to the same ol' same ol' stuff. Shame there is no magic orb to peer into an alternate timeline. 

    First and foremost, Dek can be replaced by a human knight/warrior, another alien creature from star wars trying to prove himself etc... It would change very little in the actual movie, thus not having a point in being a predator movie.

    PG13 is a business choice, that's supposed to bring more money in, which softens the movie.

    CGI fest, just like every this era blockbuster (and that no one can deny eye to eye), what's really different about this one, comparing it to Star Wars, Avatar etc ?

    Also Dan's a great idea siphoner, but that's not his ideas. Numerous nice visual or else ideas are blatantly taken from elsewhere.

    Few examples the blood revealing camouflaged predator in Prey ripped from... The Predator (lol), the grappling scorpion weapon from Kok was also in The Predator before, the dangerous planet with wild fauna ripped off the Avatar planet, I cannot believe he didn't took it from there.

    If he wants to work on other IP's so bad which is obvious now (star wars, mad max etc) well he should do it.
    While I like Badlands (It certainly has parts that I would tweek), I perfectly understand your points. I feel the same way with how other IPs are being handled recently, I will not say which ones because I already beat that horse to death already.
  11. BigDaddyJohn
    Quote from: Mr.Turok on Dec 09, 2025, 02:16:15 AM
    Quote from: BigDaddyJohn on Dec 08, 2025, 03:52:54 PMFirst and foremost, Dek can be replaced by a human knight/warrior, another alien creature from star wars trying to prove himself etc... It would change very little in the actual movie, thus not having a point in being a predator movie.

    PG13 is a business choice, that's supposed to bring more money in, which softens the movie.

    CGI fest, just like every this era blockbuster (and that no one can deny eye to eye), what's really different about this one, comparing it to Star Wars, Avatar etc ?

    Also Dan's a great idea siphoner, but that's not his ideas. Numerous nice visual or else ideas are blatantly taken from elsewhere.

    Few examples the blood revealing camouflaged predator in Prey ripped from... The Predator (lol), the grappling scorpion weapon from Kok was also in The Predator before, the dangerous planet with wild fauna ripped off the Avatar planet, I cannot believe he didn't took it from there.

    If he wants to work on other IP's so bad which is obvious now (star wars, mad max etc) well he should do it.

    Some of these I can understand to a slight degree, like I would have liked Badlands to be a bit more grittier myself, but the "great idea siphoner" comment is where I am a bit lost. Can you elaborate further on why this is even a bad thing? My mind always goes back to how "art cannot exist in a vacuum and is always influenced by other forces, as nothing is truly original when you really look deep into it", when I read that. Of course ideas will be inspired by other ideas, that's part of the creative process, unless I am misunderstanding.

    Like saying the grappling scorpion weapon getting ripped off from The Predator seems like its saying every Predator movie that used a plasmacaster is unoriginal because it's ripping off from the first film. It's just part of the arsenal.

    Everyone is inspired by something else, I agree. That's even a good thing I'd say. But there is being inspired and there is tastelessly rip off something. I think Dan has done the latter too many times for my taste.

    When you directly copy and paste an idea, usually it shows.
    The grappling hook is minor and not the best example I concede, but the rest is not.

    Also the fan fiction aspect of some of his other ideas is through the roof I'm sorry to say.
  12. SiL
    Adjusted for inflation it's currently the second lowest grossing behind Predator 2, but I expect it to overtake Predators and AvPR at least.

    ... inflation is a bitch.
  13. PredBabe
    :laugh:


    While I do really enjoy Badlands, I can see where someone questions it as a good Predator movie. It's debatable because it's very different from previous movies  which clearly was Dan's intent...

    I think that's why I enjoy it over the likes of Predators and Prey though. They were both guilty of playing things too safe and clung too close to the original formula and I find them to be boring because of this.

    But Badlands is still flawed in terms of pacing and tone which I think some adjustments (even minor ones) could have felt like big improvements that would have made this movie feel more like a film about an actual Predator as the main character and easier for some fans to accept into the series.

    Despite those story issues and some gripes in design choices, I never thought we'd see this sort of story attempt play out on the big screen so it's refreshing in that sense for me.

  14. Mr.Turok
    Quote from: BigDaddyJohn on Dec 08, 2025, 03:52:54 PMFirst and foremost, Dek can be replaced by a human knight/warrior, another alien creature from star wars trying to prove himself etc... It would change very little in the actual movie, thus not having a point in being a predator movie.

    PG13 is a business choice, that's supposed to bring more money in, which softens the movie.

    CGI fest, just like every this era blockbuster (and that no one can deny eye to eye), what's really different about this one, comparing it to Star Wars, Avatar etc ?

    Also Dan's a great idea siphoner, but that's not his ideas. Numerous nice visual or else ideas are blatantly taken from elsewhere.

    Few examples the blood revealing camouflaged predator in Prey ripped from... The Predator (lol), the grappling scorpion weapon from Kok was also in The Predator before, the dangerous planet with wild fauna ripped off the Avatar planet, I cannot believe he didn't took it from there.

    If he wants to work on other IP's so bad which is obvious now (star wars, mad max etc) well he should do it.

    Some of these I can understand to a slight degree, like I would have liked Badlands to be a bit more grittier myself, but the "great idea siphoner" comment is where I am a bit lost. Can you elaborate further on why this is even a bad thing? My mind always goes back to how "art cannot exist in a vacuum and is always influenced by other forces, as nothing is truly original when you really look deep into it", when I read that. Of course ideas will be inspired by other ideas, that's part of the creative process, unless I am misunderstanding.

    Like saying the grappling scorpion weapon getting ripped off from The Predator seems like its saying every Predator movie that used a plasmacaster is unoriginal because it's ripping off from the first film. It's just part of the arsenal.
  15. BigDaddyJohn
    Quote from: Mr.Turok on Dec 08, 2025, 01:39:11 AM
    Quote from: solace97 on Dec 07, 2025, 05:34:11 AM
    Quote from: Mr.Turok on Dec 07, 2025, 05:22:46 AM
    Quote from: solace97 on Dec 05, 2025, 05:05:38 PM
    Quote from: PredBabe on Dec 05, 2025, 07:55:31 AMTheir bitterness towards the 1987 Predator movie is an interesting take.


    I've noticed a becoming trend to just absolutely shit on the actual good installments of either franchise as of late. Or severely downplay them.
    Because old timers couldn't stop saying how Badlands isn't an exemplary Predator film like the first one. Lots of people even in here had done this to talk about how Prey, KoK, and Badlands are not real Predator films like the first.
    I consider myself an old timer, and while I enjoyed badlands I think it's a far cry to call it an exemplary film.
    Minor grammar mistake, fixed it.  I meant that many keep using the first film as only what a real exemplary Predator film really is compared to the new films.

    Quote from: BigDaddyJohn on Dec 07, 2025, 12:53:30 PMOld timer/young timer is a silly thing. You love the movies or you don't.

    Badlands is a predator movie that betrays what the creature is.

    Dan apparently wanted to make another movie, with other IP's, it's so visible it's sometimes funny to watch. I'm not sure making a Predator movie was his main priority.
    I know you didn't want to explain your thoughts on the film, but I am curious to see what went wrong in your eyes. I never thought that it went side ways, just that simply it is purposely a different film that is meant apart from the usual formula that we have been familiar with for decades and the leap is paying off big time. If anything, I do wonder if it would have reached a similar positive acclaim if it went to the same ol' same ol' stuff. Shame there is no magic orb to peer into an alternate timeline. 

    First and foremost, Dek can be replaced by a human knight/warrior, another alien creature from star wars trying to prove himself etc... It would change very little in the actual movie, thus not having a point in being a predator movie.

    PG13 is a business choice, that's supposed to bring more money in, which softens the movie.

    CGI fest, just like every this era blockbuster (and that no one can deny eye to eye), what's really different about this one, comparing it to Star Wars, Avatar etc ?

    Also Dan's a great idea siphoner, but that's not his ideas. Numerous nice visual or else ideas are blatantly taken from elsewhere.

    Few examples the blood revealing camouflaged predator in Prey ripped from... The Predator (lol), the grappling scorpion weapon from Kok was also in The Predator before, the dangerous planet with wild fauna ripped off the Avatar planet, I cannot believe he didn't took it from there.

    If he wants to work on other IP's so bad which is obvious now (star wars, mad max etc) well he should do it.
  16. Mr.Turok
    Quote from: solace97 on Dec 07, 2025, 05:34:11 AM
    Quote from: Mr.Turok on Dec 07, 2025, 05:22:46 AM
    Quote from: solace97 on Dec 05, 2025, 05:05:38 PM
    Quote from: PredBabe on Dec 05, 2025, 07:55:31 AMTheir bitterness towards the 1987 Predator movie is an interesting take.


    I've noticed a becoming trend to just absolutely shit on the actual good installments of either franchise as of late. Or severely downplay them.
    Because old timers couldn't stop saying how Badlands isn't an exemplary Predator film like the first one. Lots of people even in here had done this to talk about how Prey, KoK, and Badlands are not real Predator films like the first.
    I consider myself an old timer, and while I enjoyed badlands I think it's a far cry to call it an exemplary film.
    Minor grammar mistake, fixed it.  I meant that many keep using the first film as only what a real exemplary Predator film really is compared to the new films.

    Quote from: BigDaddyJohn on Dec 07, 2025, 12:53:30 PMOld timer/young timer is a silly thing. You love the movies or you don't.

    Badlands is a predator movie that betrays what the creature is.

    Dan apparently wanted to make another movie, with other IP's, it's so visible it's sometimes funny to watch. I'm not sure making a Predator movie was his main priority.
    I know you didn't want to explain your thoughts on the film, but I am curious to see what went wrong in your eyes. I never thought that it went side ways, just that simply it is purposely a different film that is meant apart from the usual formula that we have been familiar with for decades and the leap is paying off big time. If anything, I do wonder if it would have reached a similar positive acclaim if it went to the same ol' same ol' stuff. Shame there is no magic orb to peer into an alternate timeline. 
  17. BigDaddyJohn
    Quote from: Mr.Turok on Dec 07, 2025, 05:22:46 AM
    Quote from: solace97 on Dec 05, 2025, 05:05:38 PM
    Quote from: PredBabe on Dec 05, 2025, 07:55:31 AMTheir bitterness towards the 1987 Predator movie is an interesting take.


    I've noticed a becoming trend to just absolutely shit on the actual good installments of either franchise as of late. Or severely downplay them.
    Because old timers couldn't stop saying how Badlands isn't an exemplary Predator film like the first one. Lots of people even in here had done this to talk about how Prey, KoK, and Badlands are real Predator films like the first.

    Old timer/young timer is a silly thing. You love the movies or you don't.

    Badlands is a predator movie that betrays what the creature is.

    Dan apparently wanted to make another movie, with other IP's, it's so visible it's sometimes funny to watch. I'm not sure making a Predator movie was his main priority.
  18. solace97
    Quote from: Mr.Turok on Dec 07, 2025, 05:22:46 AM
    Quote from: solace97 on Dec 05, 2025, 05:05:38 PM
    Quote from: PredBabe on Dec 05, 2025, 07:55:31 AMTheir bitterness towards the 1987 Predator movie is an interesting take.


    I've noticed a becoming trend to just absolutely shit on the actual good installments of either franchise as of late. Or severely downplay them.
    Because old timers couldn't stop saying how Badlands isn't an exemplary Predator film like the first one. Lots of people even in here had done this to talk about how Prey, KoK, and Badlands are real Predator films like the first.
    I consider myself an old timer, and while I enjoyed badlands I think it's a far cry to call it an exemplary film.
  19. Mr.Turok
    Quote from: solace97 on Dec 05, 2025, 05:05:38 PM
    Quote from: PredBabe on Dec 05, 2025, 07:55:31 AMTheir bitterness towards the 1987 Predator movie is an interesting take.


    I've noticed a becoming trend to just absolutely shit on the actual good installments of either franchise as of late. Or severely downplay them.
    Because old timers couldn't stop saying how Badlands isn't an exemplary Predator film like the first one. Lots of people even in here had done this to talk about how Prey, KoK, and Badlands are not real Predator films like the first.
  20. SpeciesWarfare
    It doesn't matter what the box office figures say because even mega hits never make any profit see Peter Jackson and New Line Cinemas issues over LOTR.

    The amount of money IPs make due to merchandise, streaming rights etc is ridiculous. Yoghurt from Spaceballs did tell us this years ago.

    Atleast they didnt try and remake the original, subvert it like in The Predator or just pick another time period.
  21. LeviatanT
    I have to think a little bit more. The thought is that Chainsaw Man movie was hit globally. I think 200 globally in pocket now.
    Anime movie > Predator Badlands
    Is hard to believe but just matter of time to used to this.
    I wanted to believe A.Romulus will be conquered by a mighty Dek and still cannot be called Flop.

    Dont want to imagine our beloved franchise stuck in Streaming platforms. I now its not shame but, anyway
  22. FilloutdahfielD
    It's a way to prop up newer, inferior entries into a series. Just insist that the originals were never that good in the first place and the crappy newer product is actually an improvement,

    I noticed it in Ghostbusters, Star Wars, Halo. It's a very popular tactic on Reddit.
  23. PredBabe
    Quote from: solace97 on Dec 05, 2025, 05:11:19 AM
    Quote from: Within the Stars on Dec 04, 2025, 03:45:47 AMPredator is known as the franchise whose only good movie had Arnold to the general public (even tho it's not even in the top 3)
    This movie was never gonna get big numbers unless they brought him back because audiences nowadays LOVE cheap nostalgia
    Predator not even in the top 3?? They haven't replicated anything remotely even close to what a viewing of Predator on the first time is like. What a god awful take.

    Their bitterness towards the 1987 Predator movie is an interesting take.
  24. solace97
    Quote from: Within the Stars on Dec 04, 2025, 03:45:47 AMPredator is known as the franchise whose only good movie had Arnold to the general public (even tho it's not even in the top 3)
    This movie was never gonna get big numbers unless they brought him back because audiences nowadays LOVE cheap nostalgia
    Predator not even in the top 3?? They haven't replicated anything remotely even close to what a viewing of Predator on the first time is like. What a god awful take.
« Newer Comments 12345 Older Comments »
AvPGalaxy: About | Contact | Cookie Policy | Manage Cookie Settings | Privacy Policy | Legal Info
Contact: General Queries | Submit News