Latest News

Predator: Badlands Director Dan Trachtenberg Breaks Down Bud, the Timeline, and James Cameron’s Reaction

Director Dan Trachtenberg has opened up in a spoiler-filled interview with Variety, revealing crucial details about the creatures, the timeline placement, and the future of the franchise following the release of Predator: Badlands.

The Mystery of Bud: Murloc Inspiration and Family Themes

One of the most talked-about elements of the film is the small critter Bud, encountered by Thia and Dek. Trachtenberg compared Bud to characters like Rocket Raccoon or Groot from Guardians of the Galaxy, explaining that the creature’s cute appearance belies a different nature.

The director confirmed that the design was actually inspired by a Murloc from World of Warcraft. He also addressed fan concerns about the creature being “too cute,” noting:

“A little bit, which is why Bud has dope action scenes and does some gnarly things… There’s always something really cool to me about the badass with the sidekick. I’s something that makes us care in a very specific way. We care about creatures and animals very differently than we care about humans. I love the idea of him backpacking and something little beside him.”

 Predator: Badlands Director Dan Trachtenberg Breaks Down Bud, the Timeline, and James Cameron's Reaction

Bud

Trachtenberg revealed that the initial concept was far different, leaning into a more supernatural trope:

“I should say, actually, at one point, we went down a road of, maybe it becomes [the Kalisk]. Almost like a gremlin, the same creature that appears small and tiny then molts its skin and then becomes huge. That just felt a little bit too supernatural to me…”

Ultimately, he loved the thematic power of Bud’s family relationship, contrasting with the human protagonists’ struggles: “Dek and Thia are dealing with really upsetting familial situations—abusive parents, so to speak, abusive family—while hunting down what’s supposed to be the most ferocious thing. And actually, that’s the thing in the movie that has the best family relationship.”

The Rock Biter Cameo

Early in the film, a strange, massive creature appears in the background on a cliffside during the title card sequence. Trachtenberg confirmed this fleeting glimpse was intentional, referring to the creature as the “Rock Biter,” a direct nod to The Neverending Story.

I always called that the Rock Biter. There’s a great line in “The Neverending Story”: “A rock biter? A rock biter!” It was always an earworm for me. They’re in the background in a few shots. But you’re like, how come we never actually get up in there and interact with it?

James Cameron’s Scepticism and Stamp of Approval

Legendary director James Cameron is credited in the film, and Trachtenberg shared a compelling story of how the Avatar director went from scepticism to high praise for Badlands. The two met while Trachtenberg was shooting in New Zealand and Cameron was working on Avatar. Trachtenberg pitched Cameron on the technical process of using a prosthetic suit combined with visual effects for the Predator’s face. Cameron’s initial reaction was cautious:

“Then we reconvened at dinner, and when he sat down, he said, ‘I was thinking about what you’re doing on the way over here. And I gotta tell you, think it’s going to work.’ That blew wind in my sails all the way back to Auckland.”

However, after seeing the final cut, Cameron’s written feedback was far more enthusiastic:

“He wrote me a note back that said many things, and one of them was, ‘I have to tell you, when I first heard about what you’re doing, I did not think it was going to work. But holy crap, you really pulled it off.’ And that put wind in my sails.”

Confirmation on the Timeline

 Predator: Badlands Director Dan Trachtenberg Breaks Down Bud, the Timeline, and James Cameron's ReactionA major question surrounding the film was its placement within the Alien and Predator lore. Trachtenberg confirmed that Predator: Badlands takes place further into the future than any other entry in the combined timelines, including Alien: Resurrection, which was set in 2381.

“Very intentionally, it is the furthest into the future in both ‘Predator’ and ‘Alien’… I’d also done so much ‘Predator’ in different time periods that I was excited for this to be in the future, even past ‘Alien: Resurrection.'”

In Alien: Resurrection, the primary antagonist trying to exploit the Xenomorph is the United Systems Military (USM) and the Weyland-Yutani Corporation was bought out by another company. Some other areas of the canon do say that Weyland-Yutani reestablished itself and came back more powerful.

The Future of Predator

When discussing potential sequels, Trachtenberg stated that while he found the ending featuring Dek’s mother “pretty cool,” any future film would need to stand on its own creative merit, not just as a connective thread. He is adopting an approach similar to the early days of the Marvel Cinematic Universe:

“Every movie is a complete thought, not that much unlike the early Marvel stuff before the first ‘Avengers’ movie, where it’s like, those are great movies, and lo and behold, we’re actually setting up that things could come together in a delicious way. But they weren’t like, ‘See how everything’s interconnected like crazy all of a sudden!’ So I’m trying to learn that lesson and make sure that any of these movies that we do are awesome ideas for movies on their own.”

With several compelling characters introduced, the director feels the franchise has many “open doors to walk through next.”

Thanks to Nightmare Asylum for the news. Keep your browsers locked on Alien vs. Predator Galaxy for the latest Predator: Badlands news! You can follow us on Facebook, X, Instagram and YouTube to get the latest on your social media walls. You can also join in with fellow Alien and Predator fans on our forums. Want to support what we do here at AvP Galaxy and get exclusive perks while doing so? Check out our Patreon!



Post Comment

Comments: 41
  1. The Necronoir
    Quote from: Scott Conover on Nov 28, 2025, 06:02:00 AM
    Quote from: The Necronoir on Nov 28, 2025, 05:38:43 AMIf you're satisfied with 'rule of cool' as a justification, that's fine. I just prefer substance over spectacle.

    The scene is important to the story being told, it's been explained to you several times now. For someone acting so smug about substance and being above the "rule of cool", it's ironic that nothing you've said for three pages has any substance to it at all.

    I never claimed the scene wasn't important, just that it could have been done using one of the creatures already established. All I'm saying (and have ever said) was that I would have preferred more screen time with less creatures fulfilling the same roles. You're free to disagree, but I tend to think less can be more.
  2. The Necronoir
    Quote from: Scott Conover on Nov 28, 2025, 05:11:15 AM
    Quote from: The Necronoir on Nov 28, 2025, 03:48:46 AMI just don't recall the snake getting a five minute, CGI-laden action sequence.

    You're upset there was cgi-laden action scene in a cgi-laden action movie? It brought the team together, showcased Dek getting an impressive kill and was entertaining... what more does it need to do?

    If you're satisfied with 'rule of cool' as a justification, that's fine. I just prefer substance over spectacle.
  3. The Necronoir
    Quote from: Coolertonic7 on Nov 27, 2025, 08:45:05 PM
    Quote from: The Necronoir on Nov 27, 2025, 11:02:03 AMCome to think of it, a wild pack of the hounds from Predators would have been fun. Seeing them in their natural ecosystem.

    While that could have been fun, implying that predators have already tamed beasts on Genna would have undermined the fact that yautjas that hunt there usually never come back alive and it would have made Dek's survival less special, because he wouldn't have been the first predator that became one with the ecosystem to survive.

    Why do they necessarily need to be hunting whenever they go to a planet? They could have expeditions that go for other reasons, such as resource collection.
  4. Huntsman
    I like Badlands. But I don't think everything needs a direct sequel. The story always goes on in a universe wnd we have to leave it somewhere. If they continue moments after Dek's mother arrives so be it, assuming the story is good. But if not, there's many other opportunities that are possible ala the comics.
  5. Coolertonic7
    Quote from: The Necronoir on Nov 27, 2025, 11:02:03 AMCome to think of it, a wild pack of the hounds from Predators would have been fun. Seeing them in their natural ecosystem.

    While that could have been fun, implying that predators have already tamed beasts on Genna would have undermined the fact that yautjas that hunt there usually never come back alive and it would have made Dek's survival less special, because he wouldn't have been the first predator that became one with the ecosystem to survive.
  6. The Necronoir
    There's always a balance to be struck between spectacle and narrative efficiency, and tastes will vary. Personally, a couple of the creatures here felt gratuitous to me, while others like the vulture were handled well. I like the poetry of Dek using a Kalisk tooth (or quill) as his gauntlet blade more than what we got too.

    Come to think of it, a wild pack of the hounds from Predators would have been fun. Seeing them in their natural ecosystem.
  7. skhellter
    Quote from: The Necronoir on Nov 27, 2025, 03:42:56 AMI still feel like the roster could have been halved, and felt more cohesive as a result. What unique purpose did the three-tentacled tree monster serve, for example?

    They find and befriend Bud during the Luna Bug scene. It's the setpiece that builds the dynamic tree-io.
    It's actually very central to the whole thing.
    Actually, the whole planet being very deadly is what causes Dek to NEED Thia.. and so forth. there's a domino effect to the movie's logic.

    I find that "does this truly need x?" mentality reductive to a certain extent.

    you could hack Predator down to a tv friendly 45 minutes with that. Does it truly "need" the camp  action scene? They could've cut Anna out entirely. Hell, the whole movie could've taken place before they even REACH the camp.. etc.. etc.. and the movie would lose so much as a result.

    This reminds me of Tom Rothman wanting to cut the flying scenes out of avatar.
    Jimbo's answer was a simple "well, i want to see it and i bet the audience does as well."
  8. SiL
    Quote from: The Necronoir on Nov 27, 2025, 09:37:58 AMHow many species do we see in the original Predator? Humans and that rodent thing Blaine encounters, because nothing else is relevant to the narrative.
    Firstly, that movie is set on Earth.We know what the life is like here because we live here. They weren't establishing an alien world.

    Secondly, we also see a scorpion, a snake, a boar, a vulture, and whatever Anytime shoots at by the river thinking it's Dutch.
  9. The Necronoir
    Quote from: SiL on Nov 27, 2025, 05:44:05 AMNot much of a world if there are only three or four animals on it, surely?

    How many species do we see in the original Predator? Humans and that rodent thing Blaine encounters, because nothing else is relevant to the narrative.

    I didn't mind seeing the creatures in the long shots for added flavour, but the constant encounters just made it too busy for me. You could easily cut the vine creatures and tentacle beast to focus more on the spitters and bison.

    Dek also finds a Kalisk tooth by the river, so that one was definitely unnecessary.
  10. BlueMarsalis79
    Pretty sure he uses a tooth from it, only saw it once so far, but yeah the world feeling inhabited's actually crucial to the film in multiple ways, it's especially evident when it comes to the idea of co-existence and not just outright exploitation.
  11. The Necronoir
    Quote from: BlueMarsalis79 on Nov 27, 2025, 12:58:02 AMI don't really think so, I'd suspected that at first, but everything either teaches Dek something essential or directly ties into his arsenal for the finale.

    I still feel like the roster could have been halved, and felt more cohesive as a result. What unique purpose did the three-tentacled tree monster serve, for example?

    I'd accuse it of being designed to sell toys, ala Star Wars, except there isn't any sign of one.
  12. The Necronoir
    Quote from: Coolertonic7 on Nov 26, 2025, 04:44:08 PM
    Quote from: The Necronoir on Nov 26, 2025, 04:36:06 PMKind've runs against his comments about not just bashing a bunch of action figures against each other though, if he cribs without innovating.

    His comments about bashing figures together were only about the possibility of a xenomorph showing up in Badlands, since he didn't want to just throw one in there for no reasons.

    I know, but there were plenty of other things in the movie that seemed to be there for no reason.
  13. The Necronoir
    Kind've runs against his comments about not just bashing a bunch of action figures against each other though, if he cribs without innovating.

    I feel like this movie was almost anti-world building in a lot of ways. Sure, it shows us tons of new things, but there is very little or no effort spent in making them seem cohesive.

    Here comes the third whaky creature in five minutes, because why not, right?!

    Honestly, I'd prefer if it was a lot more like the OG Conan and a lot less like the Jason Momoa remake.
  14. Rafael Suomessa
    Dan has probably referenced 40 different movies and medias in all his interviews, from Star Wars, to Conan, to Never Ending story. Not to sound mean but, please more original ideas and less imitation of existing material.
  15. solace97
    Quote from: bb on Nov 12, 2025, 07:16:20 AM@solace97 in what way his style
    I feel like in Aliens/Avatar/Terminator or really any of his films that are sci-fi he has a good imagination and creation for things like the power loader, dropship, human exoskeletons, and you see some of that here in the equipment on the planet.

    Storyline wise I feel like each story follows an arc of action/adventure/despair but with some type of redemption or feel good ending and we got that here as well
  16. AVP-CAPCOM
    Interesting that Dan Trachtenberg was behind the Disneyfication of the PREDATOR rather than Disney producing instead.

    That Bud alien reminded me of Woola the dog alien thing from John Carter (of Mars) 2012. But we still got solid Weyland Predator world building in there so it was a 3/5 for me.

    I just hope AVP3 will be more like RIDDICK but I'd be happy if Trachtenberg got the Director's chair along with another Director as implied by Fede Álvarez with a higher rating and mature tone.
  17. Kailem
    The buy-out specifically yes, but W-Y is said to no longer exist in the regular cut. The Weyland-Yutani Report, which is "set" post-Resurrection, says they made a comeback, which I guess this film has brought into official canon.

    Image Link
  18. Jacku
    QuoteIt can all go out the door once we start putting pen to paper on stuff, but I've looked as far as I could to feel comfortable about what I'm doing. Every movie is a complete thought, not that much unlike the early Marvel stuff before the first "Avengers" movie, where it's like, those are great movies, and lo and behold, we're actually setting up that things could come together in a delicious way. But they weren't like, "See how everything's interconnected like crazy all of a sudden!" So I'm trying to learn that lesson and make sure that any of these movies that we do are awesome ideas for movies on their own.

    "Killer of Killers" ends by connecting back to "Predator," "Predator 2" and "Prey," and since you did just evoke the Avengers, have you thought about integrating all of these different threads together into a larger thing?

    It's hard. It's fun to geek out and think, "Oh my god, wouldn't it be cool if...," even on a movie that you'd never expect that to happen in. But it's only cool if the journey there is equally worth taking.


    Pls no. Does Dan really want Prey,P1,2,Kok and Badlands all literally connected?  :o
  19. SpaceWereKim
    Well that answers the question I made yesterday. I guess that paying off all of these cliffhangers into a massive "Avengers" type film is on the table after all, even if it's not what ends up happening.
AvPGalaxy: About | Contact | Cookie Policy | Manage Cookie Settings | Privacy Policy | Legal Info
Contact: General Queries | Submit News