Latest News

Predator: Badlands Smashes Franchise Record with $80 Million Global Opening

Disney has announced that Predator: Badlands opened at number 1 at the domestic box office, delivering a strong $80 million global opening ($40 million domestic and $40 million overseas). The figure is a franchise record for an unadjusted domestic debut.

Variety has a few more details about the international performance, noting the highest overseas markets were China with $7.4 million, the United Kingdom with $3.2 million, and Mexico with $2.3 million.

Predator: Badlands has benefited from positive reviews from fans and critics and is currently sitting on a Fresh score of 85% on Rotten Tomatoes. The film continues the franchise’s creative resurgence under director Dan Trachtenberg, who previously helmed the highly praised Prey in 2022. The franchise-first PG-13 rating will also definitely help with the box office receipts, as it significantly broadens its appeal to a wider, more mainstream audience than the previous R-rated entries.

Dek's father, Njohrr, tells Kwei to kill Dek. Predator: Badlands Smashes Franchise Record with  Million Global Opening

Domestically, Predator: Badlands is the highest domestic opening for a Predator film, overtaking 2004’s Alien vs Predator, which earned $38 million. The last theatrical Predator film, 2018’s The Predator, earned $24.6 million domestically in its first weekend. Of course, these figures are unadjusted for inflation. Alien vs Predator would come out at the top at around $60 million after inflation.

The film, directed by Dan Trachtenberg and starring Elle Fanning in the dual roles of synthetics Thia and Tessa cost $105 million. Big blockbusters like this one would have to earn 2.5 times its budget to break even. That would put its target box office at around $265 million, which might prove tricky to achieve. The film will generate more revenue when it comes to streaming platforms and physical media.

Here’s a comparison table with the box office totals of previous Predator films:

Movie Title Release Date Production Budget Domestic Box Office Worldwide Box Office Worldwide Box Office (Adjusted for Inflation)
Predator Jun 12, 1987 $18.0M $59.7M $98.3M $285M
Predator 2 Nov 21, 1990 $35.0M $30.7M $54.8M $145M
AVP: Alien Vs. Predator Aug 13, 2004 $70.0M $80.3M $172.5M $295M
Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem Dec 25, 2007 $40.0M $41.8M $128.9M $199M
Predators Jul 9, 2010 $40.0M $52.0M $127.2M $170M
The Predator Sep 14, 2018 $88.0M $51.0M $159.5M $205M
Prey Aug 5, 2022 $65.0M N/A N/A N/A
Predator: Killer of Killers Jun 6, 2025 $50.0M N/A N/A N/A
Predator: Badlands Nov 7, 2025 $105.0M $40M
(Opening Weekend)
$80M
(Opening Weekend)
TBD

 

Keep your browsers locked on Alien vs. Predator Galaxy for the latest Predator: Badlands news! You can follow us on Facebook, X, Instagram and YouTube to get the latest on your social media walls. You can also join in with fellow Alien and Predator fans on our forums. Want to support what we do here at AvP Galaxy and get exclusive perks while doing so? Check out our Patreon!



Post Comment

Comments: 87
« Newer Comments 12 Older Comments »
  1. exorcissy72
    Quote from: newagescamartist on Nov 17, 2025, 07:50:15 AMI'd like to point out that this franchise sports a character that can be invisible most of the runtime. It's almost irresponsible to spend this much money on a Predator movie imo. Dan's best movie, 10 Cloverfield Lane, only cost $15 million. These budgets don't make sense to me. I've been saying that since Covenant, The Predator, and now with Badlands. If the studios want to maximize profitability they'd lower the budgets. I'm skipping Badlands, but I'm glad a lot of people enjoyed it, but now we're talking book. Next film needs a smaller budget.

    By blockbuster standards, Badlands is downright cheap.
  2. funk_master_chunk
    Quote from: newagescamartist on Nov 17, 2025, 07:50:15 AMI'd like to point out that this franchise sports a character that can be invisible most of the runtime. It's almost irresponsible to spend this much money on a Predator movie imo. Dan's best movie, 10 Cloverfield Lane, only cost $15 million. These budgets don't make sense to me. I've been saying that since Covenant, The Predator, and now with Badlands. If the studios want to maximize profitability they'd lower the budgets. I'm skipping Badlands, but I'm glad a lot of people enjoyed it, but now we're talking book. Next film needs a smaller budget.

    I posted this the other day - but a small budget 'proper' predator film on the back of this would go a long way. Not only would it give good numbers, but it's go some way to allaying the fears of the OG crowd who don't like this instalment.

    The sad thing is, we're a long way from practical effects now, when films like Avatar or the Marvel films are dominating the box office - but people want more of it, and studios are only happy to deliver.

    I don't have a problem with it, per se, but when it (potentially) impacts future projects then it's a shame.

    That said, I absolutely cannot wait to see Badlands and think it'll break even at the minimum.
  3. Within the Stars
    Not to sound harsh but Predator will never carry as big of a name as Alien even if it's last 3 movies have been better than the last 2 Alien projects, Predator might thrive in a direct to streaming platform and maybe go back to the big screen once it crossovers with Alien again
  4. Rafael Suomessa
    Quote from: newagescamartist on Nov 17, 2025, 07:50:15 AMI'd like to point out that this franchise sports a character that can be invisible most of the runtime. It's almost irresponsible to spend this much money on a Predator movie imo. Dan's best movie, 10 Cloverfield Lane, only cost $15 million. These budgets don't make sense to me. I've been saying that since Covenant, The Predator, and now with Badlands. If the studios want to maximize profitability they'd lower the budgets. I'm skipping Badlands, but I'm glad a lot of people enjoyed it, but now we're talking book. Next film needs a smaller budget.

    Predator 1987 had quite a low budget, perhaps back to practical effects would be good. I mean imagine that, that's real love for a film, CGI is "easy" but practical effects, that's hard, and somehow Predator 1987 pulled it off.
  5. newagescamartist
    I'd like to point out that this franchise sports a character that can be invisible most of the runtime. It's almost irresponsible to spend this much money on a Predator movie imo. Dan's best movie, 10 Cloverfield Lane, only cost $15 million. These budgets don't make sense to me. I've been saying that since Covenant, The Predator, and now with Badlands. If the studios want to maximize profitability they'd lower the budgets. I'm skipping Badlands, but I'm glad a lot of people enjoyed it, but now we're talking book. Next film needs a smaller budget.
  6. RIP77
    No.
    The budget is recouped when it doubles its initial investment (x2), and a film is considered a success when it multiplies its budget by at least 2.5 (or more; if it cost $200 million, it would be x3).
    This is because roughly half of the total box office revenue has to be deducted and given to theaters, etc.

    marketing revenue isn't included. It's recovered through other means.

    Therefore, Badlands won't be a blockbuster, but it will be profitable.
    Minimum box office to avoid being a failure.
    Important  make 100M in EEUU.

    Once it recoups its budget.
    Afterward, it will be a success through Blu-ray sales, streaming, and TV.

    Here's an example with Avatar 2 (total box office $2.3 billion, with  $1.2 billion for Fox).
    https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Avatar-The-Way-Of-Water-Profit.png

    Deadline will do the same with Badlands in a few months, and we'll see the total profit.

    Taking into account all income (half box office, TV, streaming, etc.)
    and expenses (marketing, budget, participation, extra costs, etc

    Although studios want a film to be a box office success to warrant a sequel, it doesn't matter if it's successful later if it wasn't successful the first time around in cinemas. There won't be a Badlands 2, but the plans were different, like the third one Dan T wanted, which would have been something different.That can get the green light

    If they consider Badlands profitable and a positive addition to the saga, they might film another  which is not Badlands 2 but    Naru's film (in theory ). one and see if it does as well or better after the good reviews and word of mouth.In a saga that has been mistreated at the box office and by critics so far.

    Another possible scenario would be to accelerate the plans.
    Maybe Fox will  forcing them to film AvP now to have a hit  more instead  and sure  before  than the  third movie with Naru tan want Dan.


  7. Within the Stars
    Movie made it's budget back already, I didn't think the marketing was anything spectacular and going by 20th century's pattern of the Budget being 40-50% of the production budget, then Badlands is already close to making back all the money spent on it, and will turn into a profit by the time merch and digital release come out
  8. Preydator
    Quote from: pRedditor on Nov 16, 2025, 05:47:56 PMAt this point it's clear that the Predator franchise just isn't financially viable. Not Dan's fault, he just picked the wrong movie series to try and elevate!

    Here's hoping his next movie will do better! (Maybe Star Wars? Or Marvel!!!)

    Once Dan T is done with Predator I hope he'll make original movies. He deserves better than superheroes franchises lol


    https://x.com/GiteshPandya/status/1990091313102921799?t=YHfelR4Rv-OxmLfYT2AVSw&s=19
  9. Serpico Jones
    Quote from: Zazeren on Nov 16, 2025, 06:35:37 PMWhatever form AVP takes


    It needs to be more of an alien movie that happens to co-Star the Yautja than a Yautja movie that has alien as the main antagonist

    It also should steer clear of anything remotely controversial like the Xenomorphs alleged origins or alien resurrection references

    Badlands doesn't firmly state its era and frankly, it doesn't need to be post-resurrection if you want Dek involved

    They should stick to the tone of the Dark Horse comics and add the colonial marines. Military science fiction, more of an Aliens vibe.
  10. Zazeren
    Whatever form AVP takes


    It needs to be more of an alien movie that happens to co-Star the Yautja than a Yautja movie that has alien as the main antagonist

    It also should steer clear of anything remotely controversial like the Xenomorphs alleged origins or alien resurrection references

    Badlands doesn't firmly state its era and frankly, it doesn't need to be post-resurrection if you want Dek involved
  11. pRedditor
    At this point it's clear that the Predator franchise just isn't financially viable. Not Dan's fault, he just picked the wrong movie series to try and elevate!

    Here's hoping his next movie will do better! (Maybe Star Wars? Or Marvel!!!)
  12. Ultramorph
    Saw this again yesterday, was disappointed it got bumped out of the really big screens by other movies, but there were probably more people at the screening that the one I went to on release day.
  13. RIP77
    67% fall in EEUU.

    EEUU ➖ $66,3M
    International -- $70,0M
    Total-- $136,3M


    100 million in the US can achieve them.

    And globally difficult  reach 250 million. Perhaps more than double that, more than 210 million sure.
    It won't multiply by 2.5.
    Maybe by 2.1 its budget
    Final box office just enough for profitability but not a success.
    Low expectations for the franchise are helpful and important for Fox  for demand   lower
    They'll be somewhat happy and angry at the same time.
    It remains in an intermediate point, in no man's la
    It could have been a $260 million success, but it could also have been a failure.

    There are films that have made 2.5x but when they failed in the US it wasn't enough ( as Covenant ).
    That's why it's very important that it reaches $100 million in the US.

  14. Rafael Suomessa
    Quote from: flacerda on Nov 16, 2025, 11:23:13 AM
    Quote from: Rafael Suomessa on Nov 16, 2025, 10:08:03 AM
    Quote from: flacerda on Nov 16, 2025, 09:38:34 AMI'm actually quite surprised it's not doing that well even with a PG-13. My screening on opening night here in Helsinki was quite empty as well.

    I went to Tennispalatsi on opening night, I was surprised that there were not too many people.

    Same screening perhaps. Sali 3?

    Yep!
  15. SiL
    Turns out people under 18 don't care as much about Predator anyway.

    But lots of fans have enjoyed taking their kids to see it so I think it has helped a bit.
  16. pmaz11
    The first 2 times I saw the film, there were good crowds for sure in my city. Saw it 11/5 & 11/6 during the week and each showing still had a pretty full theater.

    3rd showing was 11/10, which was quieter for sure being Monday. But enjoyed the solo watch on my day off ;D (Also, went into this showing knowing it takes place after Alien: Resurrection, which made it a little different)


    Seeing it one last time/4th in theaters tomorrow in a normal digital theater & excited to look out for different things this time. Definitely more drop off this weekend it looks like, but hope it keeps pulling in the $$$.
  17. Preydator
    Quote from: Within the Stars on Nov 15, 2025, 06:29:12 PMI think it will break even just fine, even if only when it gets to digital

    Yeah, it's gonna do at least decently.

    Quote from: Beans81 on Nov 15, 2025, 06:35:00 PMI've seen the movie twice & both screenings there was a total of 4 people including myself & wife. Second was us again plus our 9 year old....that's kinda rough

    2 out of my 3 viewings were far from full too. Still, it appears to be doing fine
  18. Pizza
    @alcoves
    Regarding the situation on people not purchasing physical media as much as they did in say 2018 vs now with streaming.

    Sure times have changed, Badlands won't be available to view for free instantly on Disney Plus. Once the window of time has gone by from leaving the theaters, renting or purchasing digital will be the only option first, so obtaining newer subscribers to Disney will probably be minimal at most for when Badlands is free to watch.

    One could argue the lost revenue from disc's has only been reaccumulated digitally, however my brief online news scrolling over the last couple years has informed me that studios have lost money with this present age of streaming compared to say 2014 when disc sales made up the bulk of there home sales revenue. You know $20 a month offers a whole network of content Vs. buying a single film on disc mostly costing more.
    Which lead me to believe or at least consider that The Predator would probably have gathered more revenue on home release then perhaps what Badlands will bring in.

    Feel free to have an opinion on that topic were all friends here.

    Nevertheless studios that release films in theaters care the most about the theatrical box office numbers
    Badlands is doing good domestically but internationally should have been better, Disney can afford to make another one
    but the economics need to be addressed as to how to get more people to show up for the sequel next time for the international markets and therefore the sequel could be delayed .

    Just thought I'll point out in comparison with The Predators opening weekend internationally Vs. Badlands international box office take.
  19. Perfect-Organism
     I just went and saw this film.  I'm not a big Predator fan, but this was off the charts f**king awesome!  What a ride!  Not a single human being in the whole film, yet a very human tale.  Wow!
« Newer Comments 12 Older Comments »
AvPGalaxy: About | Contact | Cookie Policy | Manage Cookie Settings | Privacy Policy | Legal Info
Contact: General Queries | Submit News