Latest News

Aliens: Expanded – Collector’s Edition Announced & Now Available To Order

Aliens: Expanded, the massive 4+ hour commentary from director Ian Nathan and the team at CreatorVC recently enjoyed a nomination for the prestigious Rondo Hatton award in the ‘Best Documentary’ category. The exhaustive documentary is now going even further, with the release of a new 2 disc Collector’s Edition that includes 12+ hours of the not-so-quite-raw (they edited for sense and repetition) interviews featuring within the documentary! 

In addition to the whopping amount of interviews, the Collector’s Edition also includes Inside Aliens Expanded, a featurette with director Ian Nathan and producer Robin Block, an additional alternative new “theatrical” cut of Aliens: Expanded which is described as “pacier and more direct,” a Collector’s Edition Booklet which charts the production of the documentary itself and includes production diary and script pages and notes. And lastly, a 2-Disc Slipcase.

Aliens: Expanded – Collector’s Edition is available for purchase now for $99. There is also an upgrade package available for fans who already supported Aliens: Expanded which comes with the new disc, slipcase and booklet for $64.99. You can find out further details and pick up Aliens: Expanded on CreatorVC’s store now.

Keep your browsers locked on Alien vs. Predator Galaxy for the latest Alien news! You can follow us on FacebookX, InstagramThreadsBluesky, and YouTube to get the latest on your social media walls. You can also join in with fellow Alien and Predator fans on our forums.



Post Comment

Comments: 45
  1. Engineer
    The lazy menus and bare minimum special features is an industry-wide trend from what I've heard. Spend less making the physical media, charge the same prices for it... or something to that effect...
  2. Engineer
    Quote from: StrangeShape on May 03, 2025, 08:06:20 PM
    Quote from: Engineer on May 03, 2025, 12:07:43 AM
    Quote from: SM on May 02, 2025, 10:32:47 AMIs it correct to assume there weren't any?
    Correct.

    My personal opinion? It's a good documentary for new or casual fans looking to learn more about the film without having to search for magazine articles that are upwards of 30 years old now. But us hardcore fans? No, you won't learn anything new. That being said, it doesn't mean one might not still find it enjoyable, regardless. I just wish that they had marketed this thing as being for those newer and more casual fans (whom, let's be honest, were the ones who bankrolled it in the first place) rather than saying it was meant for the "hardcore fans." That sounds extremely elitist and ultimately not accurate... I mean, there's no shame in making a product for newer/casual fans, and all of the hardcore fans I saw taking about it said the same thing: "what could they possible tell us that wasn't already said in the 'Superior Firepower' documentary?" The answer to that question is "nothing." So why they pitched it the way they did is bizarre to me...

    Thats pretty much what I thought. Im always against judging something you didnt see, but I wasnt interested in it because the ultimate 'Making Of', the "Superior Firepower" has already been done. Now, how could I say its better without seeing Expanded? Couple reasons

    1. Superior Firepower was made primarily using archival, rare behind the scenes footage. As far as I know, Expanded is all new interviews with some photos spliced in - typical, by-the-bumbers modern Documentary


    2. It also mixed in archival interviews from the set of the movie with interviews from early 2000s. This way, we get a whole picture - newer and older. Expanded as far as I know, its all new 2024 interviews, at the time when memories just an impression - I think recollections from 86 and even 2002 are far more valuable than from 40 years after the movie was made. Not only that, but a lot of the key players had passed away since - James Horner, Syd Mead, Ron Cobb, Stan Winston. They were all included in SF (Superior Firepower). And why no key players from Winston team were interviewed? Wheres Rosengrant and Mahan? Why is Gillis and Woodfruff there when they were new hires working under basically everyone else at the time? I could understand Tom, he helped sculpt the Warrior heads but Gillis? He had a minimal task on the picture, tiny work with facehugger as far as I remember. But the key players from Winston team who sculpted the Queen and the aliens and made the animatronics, along with Winston, were on SF

    3. As far as I know, Expanded uses original music, not the film score. The way SF was made, it had a feeling of the movie it was about. It was edited along with the music in such way, it really felt like a part of the movie.

    So, unless Im mistaken on any of the points and correct me if I am(and I didnt research Expanded much because from the get go I was taken aback by fixing something thats not broken), from the get go it told me its not only something heavily inferior to what was already available, but also seemingly another cookie cutter modern doc

    Still, I feel bad criticizing something I havent seen, but Im simply explaining why I was not interested in it from the beginning

    Yea I'll agree with your assessment here. Funny thing is, since you brought up the score, the one used for aliens expanded bugged me. It was a generic sounding score, that evokes the 80s but not "aliens" at all. Would have been perfectly suitable for one of their other docs that weren't focused on a single film like this one, but rather films from certain genres in the 80s.

    On a slight tangent, I have a thing about DVD and blu ray menus. The menus on the old legacy boxset were fantastic. The alien 4K menu is my new favorite; it's fantastic too! The aliens 4K menu was probably my least favorite, because it's so static. Oddly enough, the aliens expanded menu turned out ok, and maybe even outdid the aliens 4K. Wouldn't justify buying a copy just for the menu screen though lol
  3. Prez
    Curious. These are the same guys who have also made the recent `The Thing Expanded' doco too? I was more keen for that one personally as I feel I've seen or read it all in regards to Aliens but The Thing not so much.

    Very hesitant now given their dubious marketing tactics.
  4. Mike’s Monsters
    I was told by a few buddies of mine who work at Legacy Effects that no one ever asked or reached out to have anyone from Stan Winston's team involved in the documentary.

    After seeing the documentary myself, (thankfully without paying for it) I feel like all of the criticisms are totally valid. Especially now, with how they're being snakes about it and asking for even more money for extra footage that should have been included in the first place. If this extra footage wasn't in the original cut, I'm going to assume there's nothing of real value in it, or else it would've been part of the documentary already. The whole thing felt like a waste of time. Sure, it's nice to hear from everyone again and get a little more from some cast members we don't usually hear from, but I didn't walk away feeling like I gained anything new or worthwhile.
  5. StrangeShape
    Quote from: Engineer on May 03, 2025, 12:07:43 AM
    Quote from: SM on May 02, 2025, 10:32:47 AMIs it correct to assume there weren't any?
    Correct.

    My personal opinion? It's a good documentary for new or casual fans looking to learn more about the film without having to search for magazine articles that are upwards of 30 years old now. But us hardcore fans? No, you won't learn anything new. That being said, it doesn't mean one might not still find it enjoyable, regardless. I just wish that they had marketed this thing as being for those newer and more casual fans (whom, let's be honest, were the ones who bankrolled it in the first place) rather than saying it was meant for the "hardcore fans." That sounds extremely elitist and ultimately not accurate... I mean, there's no shame in making a product for newer/casual fans, and all of the hardcore fans I saw taking about it said the same thing: "what could they possible tell us that wasn't already said in the 'Superior Firepower' documentary?" The answer to that question is "nothing." So why they pitched it the way they did is bizarre to me...

    Thats pretty much what I thought. Im always against judging something you didnt see, but I wasnt interested in it because the ultimate 'Making Of', the "Superior Firepower" has already been done. Now, how could I say its better without seeing Expanded? Couple reasons

    1. Superior Firepower was made primarily using archival, rare behind the scenes footage. As far as I know, Expanded is all new interviews with some photos spliced in - typical, by-the-bumbers modern Documentary


    2. It also mixed in archival interviews from the set of the movie with interviews from early 2000s. This way, we get a whole picture - newer and older. Expanded as far as I know, its all new 2024 interviews, at the time when memories just an impression - I think recollections from 86 and even 2002 are far more valuable than from 40 years after the movie was made. Not only that, but a lot of the key players had passed away since - James Horner, Syd Mead, Ron Cobb, Stan Winston. They were all included in SF (Superior Firepower). And why no key players from Winston team were interviewed? Wheres Rosengrant and Mahan? Why is Gillis and Woodfruff there when they were new hires working under basically everyone else at the time? I could understand Tom, he helped sculpt the Warrior heads but Gillis? He had a minimal task on the picture, tiny work with facehugger as far as I remember. But the key players from Winston team who sculpted the Queen and the aliens and made the animatronics, along with Winston, were on SF

    3. As far as I know, Expanded uses original music, not the film score. The way SF was made, it had a feeling of the movie it was about. It was edited along with the music in such way, it really felt like a part of the movie.

    So, unless Im mistaken on any of the points and correct me if I am(and I didnt research Expanded much because from the get go I was taken aback by fixing something thats not broken), from the get go it told me its not only something heavily inferior to what was already available, but also seemingly another cookie cutter modern doc

    Still, I feel bad criticizing something I havent seen, but Im simply explaining why I was not interested in it from the beginning
  6. Engineer
    Quote from: SM on May 02, 2025, 10:32:47 AMIs it correct to assume there weren't any?
    Correct.

    My personal opinion? It's a good documentary for new or casual fans looking to learn more about the film without having to search for magazine articles that are upwards of 30 years old now. But us hardcore fans? No, you won't learn anything new. That being said, it doesn't mean one might not still find it enjoyable, regardless. I just wish that they had marketed this thing as being for those newer and more casual fans (whom, let's be honest, were the ones who bankrolled it in the first place) rather than saying it was meant for the "hardcore fans." That sounds extremely elitist and ultimately not accurate... I mean, there's no shame in making a product for newer/casual fans, and all of the hardcore fans I saw taking about it said the same thing: "what could they possible tell us that wasn't already said in the 'Superior Firepower' documentary?" The answer to that question is "nothing." So why they pitched it the way they did is bizarre to me...
  7. wmmvrrvrrmm
    Quote from: SM on May 02, 2025, 10:32:47 AMIt smelled bad from the outset.

    I was just trawling through the rest of this thread and noted a comment I made yonks ago about any major revelations winding up on Youtube.

    Is it correct to assume there weren't any?

    I thought I'd start using material from the documentary on my blog once it didn't look as if I was going to try to interfere with their sales by stealing everything too soon but I liked what Paul Reiser said about his costume, and there were things about what went on behind the scenes that would help build up the behind the scenes world, but it's not as if there are any big revelations. Cameron didn't have much  of interest to say.

    I think that I managed to grab the biggest revelations out of the ether as ideas at the time they were making their documentary, and it was nothing that they wanted to know about and in the end since it's all unconfirmed, nothing that anyone wants to know really. And all I can do is want to poke holes through Jim Cameron about the way he adapted Giger's work, even sketches for Poltergeist 2 and basically in a brilliant way, ripped off Hill Street Blues season 1, and Asterix In Spain

    I'll be happy to see the extended interviews, I'm sure, or at least some of them


    I thought that in the documentary, this Alien Theory person almost started to wake up when he talked about Alien V Predator and that's about it. I don't know much about his videos though

    I thought from their address that I was sinking money into a local business venture, because it was just a ten minute bus ride from where I live, but later I found out that it was their solicitor's address




    If somebody did a documentary or even a podcast episode on the 'other side of the development of Aliens', I would these days have a lot to talk about, even mentioning Wernher Von Braun and Dalí, but these strands of idea development might seem too fantastical to talk about for some
  8. oduodu
    that s why sometimes i wonder why people buy the stuff in the 1st place. if the 1st installmemt was just a rehashing of old stuff why would you buy it?
  9. 426Buddy
    Yeah... this thing was a scam from the get go. I actually liked the first "In Search of Darkness". Everything after that seems to be more and more  of a cheap cash grab.

    Glad I never supported this thing.
  10. SM
    It smelled bad from the outset.

    I was just trawling through the rest of this thread and noted a comment I made yonks ago about any major revelations winding up on Youtube.

    Is it correct to assume there weren't any?
  11. SiL
    I'm frankly dumbfounded by the lack of indignation at their sales tactics - and saddened by how many people are just buying it.

    They absolutely insisted the only way to get this was to be a backer. No other possible way to get your hands on it - be in first or miss it.

    Oh actually sorry you can totally just buy it later.

    Oh and here's some f**king DLC. Where you can also buy the full thing.

    I truly do not understand how people are basically responding with "oh, you" like they're just some cheeky buggers and not an actual predatory company, and then forking out an extra $60+ for something they already bought.
  12. RidgeTop
    Still haven't seen any real detailing as to what the collector's edition entails other than extended interviews. Ok... with whom? Anything else? Just the theatrical cut? $69 is also too steep an ask for essentially a bonus disc when I had already given them $100. Almost picked this up but decided against it.
  13. SM
    I just checked the link above and didn't realise how hideously expensive it is.

    Cheapest was $65 (USD + shipping) for someone who bought the original?
  14. Engineer
    You won't learn anything new from this. Superior Firepower is, in fact, superior...

    Personal opinion: this shorter, theatrical cut, should have been provided to their backers for free as a "thank you" since they made it anyway, and got paid for it already via its theatrical run. To re-package it this way is a cash grab, through and through. But again, the rest of the extras they're advertising? 🤷 have no idea about that stuff, but I still wouldn't buy it myself...
  15. Xenomrph
    Quote from: Corporal Hicks on May 01, 2025, 06:59:27 AMI know about the who-har with the fomo promotion, and I don't disagree. I do think it'd have been much more honest if they'd just basically been straight forward with "you're all basically financiers, we need your money to do more/better interviews and you'll get a copy after we're done" but I do wonder if it'd have been ineffective.
    Yeah but, like, you're not a financier at this stage - the documentary is made and paid for, the actors and talent have been paid, everyone has done their part and the product exists. Double-charging you for something that you should have gotten in the first place is scummier than them FOMO scamming everyone.

    A reminder: the documentary was made by CreatorVC - a venture capital company. They are the ones who ponied up the initial cash to get it made. We know this because the kickstarter campaign had actual footage to show backers, which means the documentary was done before the campaign started. If backers were actually funding the project to get it made, it would have been filmed after the campaign ended, and wouldn't exist if the campaign failed.
    The reality is that the backers (and anyone else who bought in later) were the return on CreatorVC's investment in a product that already existed.
  16. SM
    Quote from: Corporal Hicks on May 01, 2025, 06:59:27 AMI've ordered my upgrade package! I'm actually really excited for these extended interviews, it was something I said I'd purchase if they did release something like that. I know about the who-har with the fomo promotion, and I don't disagree. I do think it'd have been much more honest if they'd just basically been straight forward with "you're all basically financiers, we need your money to do more/better interviews and you'll get a copy after we're done" but I do wonder if it'd have been ineffective. I was also disappointed to not be invited on the production, given I'm also on the same continent as them, but I just don't think we have as viewable success as all the view counters on Alien Theory's channel or the download counters on POs Podbean feed. But I also thoroughly enjoyed the finished documentary, and I don't regret giving them my money. I am curious to see this theatrical cut of it.

    I'm honestly surprised that you actually continue to give them even more money.

    You guys actually have a decent platform - maybe call this shit out.
  17. StrangeShape
    Quote from: Corporal Hicks on May 01, 2025, 06:59:27 AMI've ordered my upgrade package! I'm actually really excited for these extended interviews, it was something I said I'd purchase if they did release something like that. I know about the who-har with the fomo promotion, and I don't disagree. I do think it'd have been much more honest if they'd just basically been straight forward with "you're all basically financiers, we need your money to do more/better interviews and you'll get a copy after we're done" but I do wonder if it'd have been ineffective. I was also disappointed to not be invited on the production, given I'm also on the same continent as them, but I just don't think we have as viewable success as all the view counters on Alien Theory's channel or the download counters on POs Podbean feed. But I also thoroughly enjoyed the finished documentary, and I don't regret giving them my money. I am curious to see this theatrical cut of it.

    How would you compare what was already released to the "Superior Firepower"? Im not and never was interested in Aliens Expanded mostly because I dont think anyone can do better than whats on Quadrilogy/Anthology, so how would you compare the two
  18. SiL
    Quote from: Corporal Hicks on May 01, 2025, 06:59:27 AMI do think it'd have been much more honest if they'd just basically been straight forward with "you're all basically financiers, we need your money to do more/better interviews and you'll get a copy after we're done" but I do wonder if it'd have been ineffective.
    I'm reasonably sure what they did violates misleading advertising guidelines in some countries. That wouldn't fly in Australia.
  19. Corporal Hicks
    I've ordered my upgrade package! I'm actually really excited for these extended interviews, it was something I said I'd purchase if they did release something like that. I know about the who-har with the fomo promotion, and I don't disagree. I do think it'd have been much more honest if they'd just basically been straight forward with "you're all basically financiers, we need your money to do more/better interviews and you'll get a copy after we're done" but I do wonder if it'd have been ineffective. I was also disappointed to not be invited on the production, given I'm also on the same continent as them, but I just don't think we have as viewable success as all the view counters on Alien Theory's channel or the download counters on POs Podbean feed. But I also thoroughly enjoyed the finished documentary, and I don't regret giving them my money. I am curious to see this theatrical cut of it.
  20. BlueMarsalis79
    Nothing to be wary of, it is the film as, it always ought to have been.

    Quote from: BlueMarsalis79 on Apr 26, 2025, 12:08:35 PMHappy Alien Day Everyone, it is my understanding that some are still finding it very difficult to access this version, so for one month only as an alternative option I will be hosting both Aliens Refined and Alien³ Legacy in the highest possible quality:

    https://mega.nz/folder/onxxhRpY#b6sZXiZZz_MFDFLOyjUi0A

    First come, first served.
  21. Engineer
    Quote from: BlueMarsalis79 on Apr 27, 2025, 01:50:28 AMCan you please expound upon that?
    A few months ago, they made a special cut for a limited theatrical run for a UK theater (or theaters?). I think it was reduced to something like 100 minutes, or something like that. Probably needed a shorter version than 4.5 hours to convince a theater to pick it up, would be my guess. So, the "theatrical" cut, is literally just a shorter version of the documentary... significantly shorter...
AvPGalaxy: About | Contact | Cookie Policy | Manage Cookie Settings | Privacy Policy | Legal Info
Contact: General Queries | Submit News