Latest News

Alien 3 – The Legacy Cut Fan Edit Now Available!

After a nearly 5 years of meticulous work from the team over at Project A34K, the much anticipated Alien 3 – The Legacy Cut is now available! For those of you out there who are wondering what we’re talking about, The Legacy Cut is a fan edit of Alien 3 that aimed to upscale the film to 4K resolution and to finally do the film’s creature effects justice. Just that effort alone involved going frame by frame to trace around the puppet.

Check out Alien 3 – The Legacy Cut’s release trailer below!

In addition to changes to the colour grading, the Alien’s visual effects and some environmental tidying, Alien 3 – The Legacy Cut is also a slight blending of both the generally much preferred Assembly Cut and Theatrical Cut of Alien 3 which keeps the additional footage of the Assembly and Spike/the dogburster from the Theatrical Cut. There are also some additional narrative tweaks including changes to the opening credits to remove the facehugger.

Be sure to head on over to www.a34k.net to check out further details about Project A34K’s fantastic work on this new fan cut, including before and afters so you can see this impressive work side-by-side with the original! You can also request a copy of the film through the form on the home page.

Be sure to keep your targets set on Alien vs. Predator Galaxy for all the latest updates on Alien & Predator fan projects! You can follow us on FacebookX, InstagramThreadsBluesky, and YouTube to get the latest on your social media walls. You can also join in with fellow Alien and Predator fans on our forums.



Post Comment
Comments: 79
« Newer Comments 12 Older Comments »
  1. Oasis Nadrama
    Quote from: Allen (1979) on Apr 20, 2025, 01:16:31 PMAFAIK it's done to get past censor filters of commenting platforms (even if the words aren't outright censored, lots of places will automatically flag comments with these words for review [sometimes perpetually], likely because they're sometimes considered telltale signs of trolling/flaming), and it then just becomes a habit for some or they just do it pre-emptively to avoid TOS issues.

    Absolutely. Personally I was forced to take the habit to "disrupt" words like r@pe, r^cism, transph0bia, f4scism etc in various ways because it is now common for all kinds of social networks to ban, shadowban or lock away user profiles and posts displaying such words.

    And we don't always have the time to learn what's okay and what's not okay on every website, so better make it into an universal move.

    It's sad but such is the garbage cyberpunk dystopia we live in.
  2. Allen (1979)
    Quote from: The Cruentus on Apr 16, 2025, 09:29:18 PMRape might be an unpleasant word but its not a swear word, I think you can say it without getting in trouble.  :P  I have been seeing this kind of strange censorship all over youtube. words being replaced with unalive, deleting SA etc etc. Its unnecessary and if folks got problems with those words then they shouldn't watch the vids.

    AFAIK it's done to get past censor filters of commenting platforms (even if the words aren't outright censored, lots of places will automatically flag comments with these words for review [sometimes perpetually], likely because they're sometimes considered telltale signs of trolling/flaming), and it then just becomes a habit for some or they just do it pre-emptively to avoid TOS issues.

    And I suppose others may do it for personal reasons but I don't judge where people decide to establish their own boundaries because I don't live in their shoes.




    Quote from: Project A34K on Apr 16, 2025, 09:43:54 PMRegarding where the facehuggers came from, interesting fact, if you watch Aliens until the end of the credits, you can actually hear face huggers scuttling around inside the Sulaco. The egg never needed to be there. A sequel was already set up the entire time 🤷

    ALIENS' facehugger scurrying around sound and Skeletor popping his head out of the water to tell us he'd be back! (spoiler: he never came back) is why as a kid I learned to stay around until the end credits were completely done; long before the yoots of today with their MST3K Marvel stingers.

    Also a long time ago I headcanoned (and inserted into my old highly-customized Leading Edge Games Alien rpg) the notion that facehuggers can go into a hibernation state if they can't find a victim right away, where they build up a smaller, egg-like cocoon around themselves, to explain the Sulaco egg (and it's weird position in the middle of seemingly nowhere near the hangar bay), and now it was all for naught.  :P

  3. I Come In Peace
    Was wondering if it's possible to keep the facehugger in the credits and use some sort of program to change it into a super facehugger then just use the assembly cut?


    Great work by the way.


    Or use the theatrical cut with the dog which makes more sense since the alien is a runner.

  4. AVP-CAPCOM
    I tried downloading this after submitting my email, but the download complete got stuck at 8% then dropped off. It dropped out 4 times back to 0% so I quit.

    I also only would like the 720p version anyway.

    Watched the Alien Theory review on YouTube instead.
  5. BlueMarsalis79
    I personalised my copy slightly, I find the Oliver Harper commentary a bit of a bummer to be completely honest, and being that it is not strictly a viewing of this version have opted to excise it using MKVToolNix GUI.

    It is cool that you managed their approval, but much whinging for my liking, I might have rather had the official commentary or one by the people who actually made this iteration.

    On the bright side, the options of four alternate tracks for audio's absolutely wonderful that aside. 

    The inclusion of the WAV file in particular's a standout, sounding better than many official releases.
  6. Oasis Nadrama
    Nobody "wanted" that, and nobody thought Dillon as he is was a "problem".

    Project A34K just considered removing the line specifying Dillon's crimes, and after some discussion with other fans, finally decided against it.



    EDIT: Ninja'd by SiL.
  7. SiL
    The creator of the fan edit considered removing references to Dillon's history of rape but was convinced not to do so when people objected and explained why.

    As has been discussed repeatedly, even at the top of this page of the thread.
  8. Local Trouble
    Quote from: SM on Apr 16, 2025, 11:00:46 PM
    Quote from: Oasis Nadrama on Apr 13, 2025, 05:19:39 PM[Content warning: about sexual violence]

    Spoiler
    To have reservations on this point would be understandable. Sexual violence is a complex and extremely painful matter.
    It's omnipresent in Western societies (thanks to patriarchy and other systems of domination, as well as a lot of underlying ideologies such as toxic masculinity), and it's a lot harder to appropriately depict and explore than, let's say, murder, because sexual violence is tied to body autonomy, consent, agency, abuse, power relationships, PTSD and other delicate matters, and it's also a bad, traumatizing experience a lot of people have to face. The entire subject of breach of consent, assault and r@pe is a complicated one.

    Furthermore, Alien 3 is certainly not the most delicate work in the various ways it evokes the topic. I think no one will question, for example, that the big r@pe attempt on rock music in the middle of the movie was in poor taste for example - and that the Legacy Cut's decision to at least change the soundtrack is an excellent move.

    To give an explicit r@pist a heroic role, to make him a mentor of the community and a protective presence to the heroine, to allow him to find redemption both before and in the course of the movie, is an extreme choice. It's a choice that comes with a lot of difficult implications, and that can, by itself, have bad emotional impact on survivors, or make the conversation on consent more complicated. It's a choice that can even play in some patriarchal codes about tragic negative masculine figures (but that is another can of worms that would necessitate long explanations, and we're not going to have this one conversation).

    I'm not saying it's a BAD story choice, it may even be the ethical one. You could make a case that to depict people as "beyond salvation" in some circumstances reeks of some kind of essentialism, of the conviction that one can somehow become ontologically evil/without worth. And that the tale here steers away from this kind of moral absolutism, and ends up painting a more humane picture, where no one is too far gone, where anyone can find a better path for themselves and others, where it's always time to change yourself. There is something powerful in there, and in this way Dillon's past may, strangely, become part of the movie's light, not of its darkness.

    But it is still an extreme choice. And it would have been a valid and understandable decision to reorient the movie in another direction.

    I also think, like others, that framing this kind of consideration as the editor "feeling offended" is a questionable choice of words.
    It's not about "shock". Do you think one could even consider editing ALIEN 3 of all movies if they are "offended" by sexual violence?
    Rather, it's a matter of ethics, relevance and appropriateness in the ways in which stories explore specific themes.

    (If I understand right Project A34K's past interrogations.)
    [close]

    Haven't watched this - has something been changed about Dillon?

    Nope.  Apparently that's the problem.  He hasn't been appropriately bowdlerized.
  9. SM
    Quote from: Oasis Nadrama on Apr 13, 2025, 05:19:39 PM[Content warning: about sexual violence]

    Spoiler
    To have reservations on this point would be understandable. Sexual violence is a complex and extremely painful matter.
    It's omnipresent in Western societies (thanks to patriarchy and other systems of domination, as well as a lot of underlying ideologies such as toxic masculinity), and it's a lot harder to appropriately depict and explore than, let's say, murder, because sexual violence is tied to body autonomy, consent, agency, abuse, power relationships, PTSD and other delicate matters, and it's also a bad, traumatizing experience a lot of people have to face. The entire subject of breach of consent, assault and r@pe is a complicated one.

    Furthermore, Alien 3 is certainly not the most delicate work in the various ways it evokes the topic. I think no one will question, for example, that the big r@pe attempt on rock music in the middle of the movie was in poor taste for example - and that the Legacy Cut's decision to at least change the soundtrack is an excellent move.

    To give an explicit r@pist a heroic role, to make him a mentor of the community and a protective presence to the heroine, to allow him to find redemption both before and in the course of the movie, is an extreme choice. It's a choice that comes with a lot of difficult implications, and that can, by itself, have bad emotional impact on survivors, or make the conversation on consent more complicated. It's a choice that can even play in some patriarchal codes about tragic negative masculine figures (but that is another can of worms that would necessitate long explanations, and we're not going to have this one conversation).

    I'm not saying it's a BAD story choice, it may even be the ethical one. You could make a case that to depict people as "beyond salvation" in some circumstances reeks of some kind of essentialism, of the conviction that one can somehow become ontologically evil/without worth. And that the tale here steers away from this kind of moral absolutism, and ends up painting a more humane picture, where no one is too far gone, where anyone can find a better path for themselves and others, where it's always time to change yourself. There is something powerful in there, and in this way Dillon's past may, strangely, become part of the movie's light, not of its darkness.

    But it is still an extreme choice. And it would have been a valid and understandable decision to reorient the movie in another direction.

    I also think, like others, that framing this kind of consideration as the editor "feeling offended" is a questionable choice of words.
    It's not about "shock". Do you think one could even consider editing ALIEN 3 of all movies if they are "offended" by sexual violence?
    Rather, it's a matter of ethics, relevance and appropriateness in the ways in which stories explore specific themes.

    (If I understand right Project A34K's past interrogations.)
    [close]

    Haven't watched this - has something been changed about Dillon?
  10. Project A34K
    Most of them are just mailing list email submissions, so I just add them to the list and send the email out in batches of 200 at a time. I try to respond to actual messages but there are a lot.

    What the cut does is mostly aesthetic for sure. It's a special effects overhaul, color regrade resolution enhancement. Narratively it's a marriage of both existing versions. For sure the biggest draw for viewers seems to be the cleaned up sfx on the alien.

    Regarding where the facehuggers came from, interesting fact, if you watch Aliens until the end of the credits, you can actually hear face huggers scuttling around inside the Sulaco. The egg never needed to be there. A sequel was already set up the entire time 🤷
  11. The Cruentus
    Rape might be an unpleasant word but its not a swear word, I think you can say it without getting in trouble.  :P  I have been seeing this kind of strange censorship all over youtube. words being replaced with unalive, deleting SA etc etc. Its unnecessary and if folks got problems with those words then they shouldn't watch the vids.

    But that's off topic so I'll get back on.

    I am keen to see what this version of yours adds. The Assembly cut did give the prisoners some more screentime here and there, some parts fleshed out.
    Removing the magic egg is already a plus in my book but then it does need to explain where the huggers came from, but then again them sneaking on board when the Queen did is not hard to imagine.

    if you got 18,000 requests, how the heck are you going to get around answering everyone?

  12. Project A34K
    Initially I'd found it hard to reconcile the line of dialogue with any kind of redemption arc, and didn't really assign any value to the exposition beyond shock value. Through some tough love on here, watching the movie again as though for the first time, but paying more mind to Dillon, I came to the conclusion that it doesn't matter that I can't forgive him for what he's done. What matters is that he's not just practicing what he preaches. There's a scene where he tells Ripley the world doesn't matter to him any more. He's not living his gospel.

    By the end he's rejected all of it and gives his life to save the people back on earth, no less than Ripley did. He was a r**ist and murderer of women, and in the course of the story he stopped the r**e of a woman with force, and would rather give his own life than take hers.

    A bit of clarity helped me see it is all.

    Quote from: BigDaddyJohn on Apr 15, 2025, 02:40:51 PMWell that was great @Project A34K ! The usually odd shots of the alien are mostly fine now. And I love that you kept the dogburster over the ox one.

    Glad you dug it, buddy :D

    Quote from: Jaws the Revenge on Apr 15, 2025, 10:54:13 AMKudos for all the effort. But you've lost me at taking out scenes and concepts.

    That's cool, to each their own :)

    I'm really glad everyone is giving it a shot, though, and buzz around here helped. We're at about 18,000 requests now
  13. Oasis Nadrama
    Quote from: Duracell on Apr 13, 2025, 07:10:59 PM
    Quote from: Oasis Nadrama on Apr 13, 2025, 05:19:39 PM...
    even though i don't agree with some of your IMO ideologically charged assumptions, i appreciate the effort and care you put into your post! seeing this is a fan edit, the creator is of course free to follow any and all preferences they choose to pursue. i consider myself equally free to disagree from a personal standpoint with any of their choices. you seem eager to frame this as a question of morality which is why we won't find common ground. i consider art to be about truthful expression of the human experience in all its beauty and horror. morality (not to be confused with empathy) by its essence is in opposition to art because judgment (which is morality) prevents perception and expression of truth.

    Thanks for this smart and respectful message. I do agree that we won't find common ground, since we're working by different postulates, but I appreciate your perspective and this quick exchange with you was most pleasing.
  14. Jaws the Revenge
    Kudos for all the effort. But you've lost me at taking out scenes and concepts. But it's a fan edit so- Respect. I will watch.
    Yet I feel it's either the release print or the assembly cut. Sure a clean up of the FX etc but to change the storyline in the opening scenes and such is not personally something I'm into
  15. Hudson
    Hadn't seen this project before the announcement on the main page today. Seems interesting. My wishlist at this point includes a cleaned up transfer for the workprint but it seems less than likely.
  16. Prez
    Quote from: Project A34K on Apr 13, 2025, 01:43:09 PM
    Quote from: Prez on Apr 13, 2025, 12:38:16 PMThinking maybe if I find some time to make a proper cover design for anyone wanting to make this into a physical copy for their private use.

    There already is a "proper" cover design, cheeky  :laugh:
    That being said, curious and happy to see what someone else comes up with


    Aha! Sorry mate. I didn't realise there was one already (shows how time poor I am in reading all the details) - no offense meant.
  17. Duracell
    Quote from: Oasis Nadrama on Apr 13, 2025, 05:19:39 PM...
    even though i don't agree with some of your IMO ideologically charged assumptions, i appreciate the effort and care you put into your post! seeing this is a fan edit, the creator is of course free to follow any and all preferences they choose to pursue. i consider myself equally free to disagree from a personal standpoint with any of their choices. you seem eager to frame this as a question of morality which is why we won't find common ground. i consider art to be about truthful expression of the human experience in all its beauty and horror. morality (not to be confused with empathy) by its essence is in opposition to art because judgment (which is morality) prevents perception and expression of truth.
  18. Oasis Nadrama
    [Content warning: about sexual violence]

    Spoiler
    To have reservations on this point would be understandable. Sexual violence is a complex and extremely painful matter.
    It's omnipresent in Western societies (thanks to patriarchy and other systems of domination, as well as a lot of underlying ideologies such as toxic masculinity), and it's a lot harder to appropriately depict and explore than, let's say, murder, because sexual violence is tied to body autonomy, consent, agency, abuse, power relationships, PTSD and other delicate matters, and it's also a bad, traumatizing experience a lot of people have to face. The entire subject of breach of consent, assault and r@pe is a complicated one.

    Furthermore, Alien 3 is certainly not the most delicate work in the various ways it evokes the topic. I think no one will question, for example, that the big r@pe attempt on rock music in the middle of the movie was in poor taste for example - and that the Legacy Cut's decision to at least change the soundtrack is an excellent move.

    To give an explicit r@pist a heroic role, to make him a mentor of the community and a protective presence to the heroine, to allow him to find redemption both before and in the course of the movie, is an extreme choice. It's a choice that comes with a lot of difficult implications, and that can, by itself, have bad emotional impact on survivors, or make the conversation on consent more complicated. It's a choice that can even play in some patriarchal codes about tragic negative masculine figures (but that is another can of worms that would necessitate long explanations, and we're not going to have this one conversation).

    I'm not saying it's a BAD story choice, it may even be the ethical one. You could make a case that to depict people as "beyond salvation" in some circumstances reeks of some kind of essentialism, of the conviction that one can somehow become ontologically evil/without worth. And that the tale here steers away from this kind of moral absolutism, and ends up painting a more humane picture, where no one is too far gone, where anyone can find a better path for themselves and others, where it's always time to change yourself. There is something powerful in there, and in this way Dillon's past may, strangely, become part of the movie's light, not of its darkness.

    But it is still an extreme choice. And it would have been a valid and understandable decision to reorient the movie in another direction.

    I also think, like others, that framing this kind of consideration as the editor "feeling offended" is a questionable choice of words.
    It's not about "shock". Do you think one could even consider editing ALIEN 3 of all movies if they are "offended" by sexual violence?
    Rather, it's a matter of ethics, relevance and appropriateness in the ways in which stories explore specific themes.

    (If I understand right Project A34K's past interrogations.)
    [close]
  19. Project A34K
    Quote from: Nickshimmy on Apr 13, 2025, 07:55:13 AMThe larger file is in HDR and has less compression so higher visual quality.

    No HDR I'm afraid. We are open minded about it in the future but for now no luck.

    Quote from: Prez on Apr 13, 2025, 12:38:16 PMThinking maybe if I find some time to make a proper cover design for anyone wanting to make this into a physical copy for their private use.

    There already is a "proper" cover design, cheeky  :laugh:

    That being said, curious and happy to see what someone else comes up with

    Quote from: Allen (1979) on Apr 13, 2025, 01:15:41 PMAnyway, I'd much rather watch/listen to an AvP podcast about the Legacy Cut. Hint nudge.  :D

    In the works  8)
  20. Allen (1979)
    Quote from: Oasis Nadrama on Apr 13, 2025, 12:10:08 PMBasically the James Somerton of the Alien fandom.

    Oof I didn't know that. I thought this was just some fanboy turf thing. I'm not much of a fan of his channel but sometimes one of his videos pops up and 50/50 chance I watch it if it's about the movies (mostly prequels because it's hard to find non-hate content for those).

    Anyway, I'd much rather watch/listen to an AvP podcast about the Legacy Cut. Hint nudge.  :D
  21. Prez
    Thinking maybe if I find some time to make a proper cover design for anyone wanting to make this into a physical copy for their private use.
  22. Oasis Nadrama
    Basically the James Somerton of the Alien fandom.

    Suggestion: we move on from talking about Alien Theory here. This is the thread of an incredible fancut, as far as I know the definitive version of Alien 3, and it doesn't deserve to be now about Alien Theory.

    (There's also a pretty serviceable thread to denounce Alien Theory's shit already.)
  23. The Cruentus
    Quote from: Elmazalman on Apr 13, 2025, 11:46:01 AM
    Quote from: Coolertonic7 on Apr 13, 2025, 02:35:14 AMAlien theory might be a plagiarist, but he's not the worst youtuber that could be associated with your project!

    Whose work(s) did this guy rip off? And is he a member here?

    He has stolen from Xenopedia, SM's timeline site. The Weyland-Yutani report and CMTM. Probably more too but he has a lot of videos, so going through all of them would be tedious. SM should make a copyright strike or authorize someone to do so on his behalf. 

    Alien Theory actually did join up to try and dispute the plagiarist claims.  He jumps in on this thread at this page. https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=61495.30
  24. The Cruentus
    Quote from: Project A34K on Apr 13, 2025, 01:53:50 AMHuh, I had no idea. My bad! Didn't mean to stir anything up!

    Yeah, Alien Theory is a known plagiarist. He steals from Xenopedia, the Alien Timeline site, and even the W-Y report and CMTM. Not a channel or someone to associate with.  I have already copyright struck him. He is currently trying to counter and made absurd claims about not knowing who is responsible despite having been confronted about it on here.  :P

    If you wish to see for yourself, check this thread out https://www.avpgalaxy.net/forum/index.php?topic=61495.0
  25. Steve
    seems like the 47GB size alien 3 in 4k download won't download for me for some reason on my iMac or even iPhone 16.  the other size works, the 22GB at 4k but not this one. could it be a broken link that was sent to me
« Newer Comments 12 Older Comments »
AvPGalaxy: About | Contact | Cookie Policy | Manage Cookie Settings | Privacy Policy | Legal Info
Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Patreon RSS Feed
Contact: General Queries | Submit News