Latest News

Alternate Ending of The Predator Was Filmed Featuring Ripley!

A few weeks back we reported on some concept art by Fausto De Martini for a facehugger-inspired breathing mask that was previously intended to be featured at the end of The Predator, prior to the “Predator-Killer” suit making the cut instead.

Alec Gillis of StudioADI also shared a practical prop that was created for the alternate ending. Now it seems that three different endings were filmed, one of them featuring Ripley in the pod.

Thanks to Yuri Everson, who shared these photos to Instagram confirming this, we can see this prop was in fact in front of the cameras at some point. And while I had to do a double-take, that is indeed Ripley’s name on the flight suit of the pod occupant, though Sigourney Weaver was not a part of any filming.

47582371_343459419571377_1678431481132215546_n47693733_380851102675688_6220553681029071445_n

His comment sheds some light on this, stating that a total of three endings were filmed:

“We shot 3 different endings for #thepredator, all variations of a “Predator Killer”. This unused ending was Predator Killer Ripley wearing the breather mask we created for the film. You can see her name tag there on her costume. Breanna Watkins played Ripley under the mask instead of Sigourney Weaver. The moving “fingers” and “tail” were deemed too facehugger-like on the day and were cut and removed by someone… Sorry @jon_k_miller who headed up making the breather mask for us @thestudioadi with @saratheterra @ape5150 Zac Teller and Lord Garth but they made me do it! Michael Diner and his amazing Vancouver crew made the pod. All in no time flat. More #bts to follow…”

The Weyland-Yutani markings seen on the concept art for the pod make a bit more sense now.

Breanna Watkins is a stunt performer who has been in a number of films including Star Trek: Beyond and Deadpool 2.

Personally, I have my doubts that a time-traveling, predator-killer armor wearing Ripley (or perhaps she was just the weapon herself?) would have gone over any better with fans than the ending we got.

Keep checking in with Alien vs. Predator Galaxy for the latest on The Predator! You can follow us on FacebookTwitter, Instagram and YouTube to get the latest on your social media walls. You can also join in with fellow Alien and Predator fans on our forums!



Post Comment
Comments: 181
« Newer Comments 1234 Older Comments »
  1. RidgeTop
    Quote from: Original Predator on Dec 31, 2018, 03:03:02 PM
    "The moving "fingers" and "tail" were deemed too facehugger-like on the day and were cut and removed by someone"

    The fact that it looked like a mechanical face hugger wasn't the problem??!??!!?  It was the moving fingers and tail!??!!?  WTF!??!?  But Ripley being attached to it isn't "too much"  ????!?!!?!?!

    More confusion, more randomness-that-doesn't-make-sense.  Which actually, the irony of it all is after seeing this piece of garbage on the big screen makes perfect sense.

    "This thing we obviously intended to look like a facehugger looks too much like a facehugger, let's not go with that." X)
  2. Original Predator
    "The moving "fingers" and "tail" were deemed too facehugger-like on the day and were cut and removed by someone"

    The fact that it looked like a mechanical face hugger wasn't the problem??!??!!?  It was the moving fingers and tail!??!!?  WTF!??!?  But Ripley being attached to it isn't "too much"  ????!?!!?!?!

    More confusion, more randomness-that-doesn't-make-sense.  Which actually, the irony of it all is after seeing this piece of garbage on the big screen makes perfect sense. 
  3. The Kurgan
    Quote from: Perfect-Organism on Dec 31, 2018, 02:47:30 PM
    The armor makes more sense than Royce, Dutch, Harrigan, and certainly more than Ripley.

    Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day.  Teach a man to fish, he'll never go hungry.  With the predator tech that was gifted to humanity, humans can make more sets of armor to defend themselves.

    I think it should have been information. About tech, their society, weaknesses, numbers, strategic assets etc. Stuff that gives you an all around edge in a potential war. Also saves on the time it takes to reverse engineer the armor to lern about tech.
  4. Perfect-Organism
    The armor makes more sense than Royce, Dutch, Harrigan, and certainly more than Ripley.

    Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day.  Teach a man to fish, he'll never go hungry.  With the predator tech that was gifted to humanity, humans can make more sets of armor to defend themselves.
  5. The Old One
    Demystifying the title creature.
    One monster overtakes the
    more interesting one in the plot.
    The villain, one actor steals
    every scene.
    With stupid characters.

    Am I describing "The Predator"
    or the aforementioned Alien?

    The difference is, all the things
    the Alien prequels have going
    for them in production design,
    the villain winning, the classic
    version of the monster firmly
    established as the superior.
    The excellent Prologue
    Peter Weyland and David.
    The virals.

    The Predator has none of.
  6. irn
    Quote from: Predwars24 on Dec 31, 2018, 09:12:06 AM
    I actually think this would've been worse because it wouldn't have made any sense. Unless they planned on making Aliens vs Predator vs Terminator to help implement time travel. Even then it's wacky because shes got a breather that looks like a facehugger? I would love a new AVP but this is just a big no for me.

    Don't give them ideas. I've joked before about how The Predator and to a lesser extent Prometheus took good grown up franchises down the silly Marvel comic book route, but looking at the way things are now the studio probably seriously thinks that's a good idea. Blinded by the $$$$$ that a totally different genre is making.

    Quote from: PsyKore on Dec 31, 2018, 09:54:42 AM
    :laugh: Yeah, usually when a new movie comes out in either Alien or Predator franchise, good or bad, I'll still buy the bluray, but for some reason I'm completely indifferent about owning this one.

    Same here.
  7. Voodoo Magic
    Quote from: PsyKore on Dec 31, 2018, 09:54:42 AM
    Quote from: whiterabbit on Dec 31, 2018, 09:26:01 AM
    Quote from:  Perfect-OrganismI will definitely have to do a few more watches though.
    Actually do what the vast majority of us did... think about it for a bunch of weeks first and then not watch it again. :P

    :laugh: Yeah, usually when a new movie comes out in either Alien or Predator franchise, good or bad, I'll still buy the bluray, but for some reason I'm completely indifferent about owning this one.

    I was exactly this way with "Alien Covenant" actually. I do own it on blu-ray now, but I waited months. After seeing it in the theater I was just in no hurry.
  8. PsyKore
    Quote from: whiterabbit on Dec 31, 2018, 09:26:01 AM
    Quote from:  Perfect-OrganismI will definitely have to do a few more watches though.
    Actually do what the vast majority of us did... think about it for a bunch of weeks first and then not watch it again. :P

    :laugh: Yeah, usually when a new movie comes out in either Alien or Predator franchise, good or bad, I'll still buy the bluray, but for some reason I'm completely indifferent about owning this one.
  9. whiterabbit
    Quote from: Predwars24 on Dec 31, 2018, 09:12:06 AM
    I actually think this would've been worse because it wouldn't have made any sense. Unless they planned on making Aliens vs Predator vs Terminator to help implement time travel. Even then it's wacky because shes got a breather that looks like a facehugger? I would love a new AVP but this is just a big no for me.
    Haha! So that's why James Cameron returned to make Terminator 6! I bet he's pissed off that they didn't insert Ripley into the timeline.  :laugh:

    Quote from:  Perfect-OrganismI will definitely have to do a few more watches though.
    Actually do what the vast majority of us did... think about it for a bunch of weeks first and then not watch it again. :P
  10. Predwars24
    I actually think this would've been worse because it wouldn't have made any sense. Unless they planned on making Aliens vs Predator vs Terminator to help implement time travel. Even then it's wacky because shes got a breather that looks like a facehugger? I would love a new AVP but this is just a big no for me.
  11. XenoVC
    I'm still in a state of hilarity and shock even 2 days after finding out this was actually filmed.

    It's the Yutani shoulder cannon ending pumped up 100x and gleeful in its not caring about the logistics of anything.
  12. Perfect-Organism
    Ok, so I just finished watching the film for the first time.

    I certainly appreciate everyone knocking this film as it made it an overall enjoyable experience.

    I am coming at this as a casual Predator fan.  My thing is Aliens.  So there was really nothing that overly irritated me.  I will definitely have to do a few more watches though.  Some preliminary comments:

    Where did the gang all get those Indian bikes from?

    The "Iron Man" armor mainly suffered from being too silly as a design.  The basic idea was not bad.

    The large Pradator did not make a lot of sense to me strictly from my background as an industrial designer.  Effectively, my issue with it is anthropometrics.  On earth, we design things for the 95 percentile man.  Based on this, most people can fit in a car.  Am I to believe that the spread of Predator people is so vast that they have to design everything to fit small and large predators?  At that scale, it would be practically impossible to accommodate such size differences.  But that's my first impression.

    And now on topic, yes it would have been really jumping the shark if they sent us Lt. Ripley from the future.  However, giving us the Iron Man armor further separates this series from the AVP series IMO.  We don't see this sort of tech in the Alien films.
  13. newagescamartist
    Here's the thing: The Predator is a hilarious movie and it works as a comedy. If you like Predator lore and aesthetics, this movie is going to piss you off. It's practically a parody. That's why this movie frustrates the hell out of me. It ruined the franchise, but it's still very watchable. Very odd movie. Black, Dekker, and FOX must have been high. I get what they were going for, but there is no way it was going to work as a serious event film. It's almost as funny as Deadpool in certain spots, and it's as action packed as the avg Marvel movie, but casual Marvel movie fans aren't going to be interested in aliens that tear out spines and hunt autistic children in the name of climate change. Predator and Alien fans were NOT the target audience, that's for damn sure. As bad as people diss on AVP:R, it at least was made for the fanbase. It sucked, but it was definitely for the fans.
  14. windebieste
    Quote from: Perfect-Organism on Dec 30, 2018, 10:05:08 PM
    Quote from: whiterabbit on Dec 30, 2018, 09:36:08 PM
    @Perfect-Organism: if you've been able to avoid the movie up until now... maybe you should take that as a hint and just avoid it.

    Ha ha!  I am sorely tempted, if not for the FOMO which is welling up in my chest.  Partly, I want to join in in the discourse on this subject, but partly I am interested to see what will happen if I go in with literally the lowest expectations ever...

    This is how I feel about it, too.  I'm not a Predator fan by and large; but have watched each movie at least once - except for this one, which I haven't seen yet.  I have largely avoided any reviews or other commentary but the general vibe filtering across the Community is Disappointment. 

    Then this piece of idiotic 'alternate ending' featuring Ripley appears online and my interest has dived even further as it concerns me that such inane creative philosophy permeates the making of the entire movie along with the whole "Fans will LOVE IT!" bullshit is a very, very risky path to take.  And in this case, falls flat on its face to give 'The Predator' an embarrassingly bloodied nose, indeed.  This does not look good.

    For me, the Big Question is 'If the movie has been so poorly received, then why drive any remaining interest it may have into the ground by releasing bullshit content that was never in the movie?' Some bullshit should just stay on the cutting room floor and not be released to the public.  Ever.  This content belongs in that category.

    I'll probably end up watching a pirated copy of the movie at a buddy's house mixed in with a bunch of Asylum Studios stuff on a Saturday night.  From what I gather, 'The Predator' is at that level, anyway.

    -Windebieste.
  15. Perfect-Organism
    Well, I manned up and opened up the blu-ray player.  After disassembling the main housing where the head sits, lo and behold, I found ample dust.  So I took my air-brush with compressor and turned it on.  No paint of course, just pressurized air.  But it makes no sense to just move the dust around.
    So, in the other hand is the vacuum cleaner.  I blew the dust with the airbrush, which meant I didn't actually touch the head, and straight into the vacuum cleaner.  And....

    It worked!

    Beer in hand, lights out, expectations lowered, and here I go to watch The Predator for the first time....

    Nothing makes you feel like dad-material more, than opening up your own-Blu-Ray player and making it work again   8)
  16. Voodoo Magic
    Quote from: Perfect-Organism on Dec 30, 2018, 10:05:08 PM
    Quote from: whiterabbit on Dec 30, 2018, 09:36:08 PM
    @Perfect-Organism: if you've been able to avoid the movie up until now... maybe you should take that as a hint and just avoid it.

    Ha ha!  I am sorely tempted, if not for the FOMO which is welling up in my chest.  Partly, I want to join in in the discourse on this subject, but partly I am interested to see what will happen if I go in with literally the lowest expectations ever...

    https://media0.giphy.com/media/yE3P1gj3qLMbe/giphy.gif?cid=19f5b51a5c2941974166554a4de94765
  17. Perfect-Organism
    Quote from: Voodoo Magic on Dec 30, 2018, 06:23:53 PM
    Quote from: CainsSon on Dec 30, 2018, 08:07:58 AM
    Quote from: Voodoo Magic on Dec 29, 2018, 03:52:38 PM
    Geez. You're all acting like a time-travelling, Predator killing, back-from-the-dead Ripley is a bad idea!!

    https://media1.giphy.com/media/wrBURfbZmqqXu/giphy.gif?cid=19f5b51a5c2797ec2f426c6b49badb6b

    It's kinda the karma a lot of this fan base deserves from where Im sitting. All the people who say they want a new direction with new characters and adult themes, were delivered exactly those things and hated it for not being more like what already was.

    Now, Im not saying there arent some of the fan base out there who see the prequels for what they are, on their own terms, with their own flaws, but ... HOW SOON WE FORGET!

    For Predator fans, no karma deserved this. At the time we had three films to speak of, and while some fans may not be fond of "Predator 2" and/or "Predators", there has never been a mass fan outrage over them that was going around, to deserve what came around:  An 11 foot Predator, an iron man suit with dreads, tons of comedy, a friendly Pred-Dog, and a child suffering from autism equating to a true warrior.

    I guess you could solely be looking at the time-travelling, Predator killing, back-from-the-dead Ripley scene and suggesting that is karma for Alien fans frustrated with the prequels, but it didn't even make it in the movie.  So I don't see any karma in play at all, if you buy into that sort of thing.

    Not having seen yet The Predator on account of a BR disc failure, I will venture to say that the Predator helmet has always been moderately reminiscent of the Iron Man face-features, so it's not much of a stretch.  But armored dreads?  Lol.  I really shouldn't be here, reading all these spoilers.
  18. XenoHunter99
    Quote from: Huggs on Dec 30, 2018, 03:45:49 AM
    I think the Star Wars movies are only alive and kicking because they say Star Wars in the title. As for the money, if I sell 5 billion worth of crap then hooray for me. But that doesn't change the fact that it's still crap.

    I agree. But if you're a big corporation like Disney, the money is all that matters. I think the Solo movie proved there are limits to what you can do, even when the label says Star Wars.
  19. Voodoo Magic
    Quote from: CainsSon on Dec 30, 2018, 08:07:58 AM
    Quote from: Voodoo Magic on Dec 29, 2018, 03:52:38 PM
    Geez. You're all acting like a time-travelling, Predator killing, back-from-the-dead Ripley is a bad idea!!

    https://media1.giphy.com/media/wrBURfbZmqqXu/giphy.gif?cid=19f5b51a5c2797ec2f426c6b49badb6b

    It's kinda the karma a lot of this fan base deserves from where Im sitting. All the people who say they want a new direction with new characters and adult themes, were delivered exactly those things and hated it for not being more like what already was.

    Now, Im not saying there arent some of the fan base out there who see the prequels for what they are, on their own terms, with their own flaws, but ... HOW SOON WE FORGET!

    For Predator fans, no karma deserved this. At the time we had three films to speak of, and while some fans may not be fond of "Predator 2" and/or "Predators", there has never been a mass fan outrage over them that was going around, to deserve what came around:  An 11 foot Predator, an iron man suit with dreads, tons of comedy, a friendly Pred-Dog, and a child suffering from autism equating to a true warrior.

    I guess you could solely be looking at the time-travelling, Predator killing, back-from-the-dead Ripley scene and suggesting that is karma for Alien fans frustrated with the prequels, but it didn't even make it in the movie.  So I don't see any karma in play at all, if you buy into that sort of thing.
  20. Evanus
    Holy shit.

    Anyway,
    Quote from: The Eighth Passenger on Dec 30, 2018, 04:38:38 PM
    Quote from: whiterabbit on Dec 30, 2018, 06:27:23 AM
    I thought the rumors were that Disney was going to shelve the fox moniker in the next 18-24 months... then again it is just a rumor.

    Bob Iger originally only mentioned that the Fox Searchlight and Fox 2000 divisions would be kept after the merger. People assumed from that, that 20th Century Fox would therefore be shelved. However, the latest news suggests that 20th Century Fox would be kept as a separate brand under Disney much like Marvel and Lucasfilm. Emma Watts (who worked with Ridley Scott to help realize the prequels) would effectively become Fox's version of Kathleen Kennedy.

    QuoteWhile it doesn't look like 20th Century Fox's chairman/CEO Stacey Snider will be sticking around (as Alan Horn would likely take her role) post-merger there is now word from THR that Vice Chair Emma Watts will have a new role at Disney.

    Watts, a seasoned production executive with strong talent relationships, is in a different position. Her exact role at Disney is still being hammered out, although her duties are almost certain to involve guiding films now in the 20th Century Fox pipeline, including the marquee Avatar and Kingsman franchises (in recent days, Kingsman 3 was dated for release on Nov. 8, 2019).

    Watts has strong ties to such filmmakers and talent as James Cameron, Ryan Reynolds, Matthew Vaughn, Ridley Scott and Matt Reeves.

    There are also signs that 20th Century Fox (with Watts overseeing), Fox 2000, and Fox Searchlight (Bob Iger has suggested they won't be touching it) could stay as in and just report directly to Alan Horn. Not unlike other studios like Marvel, Pixar, and Lucasfilm under the Disney umbrella

    https://thegww.com/20th-century-foxs-vice-chair-emma-watts-takes-new-role-at-disney-overseeing-future-fox-releases/
    Hopefully that means a third prequel is still possible.
  21. 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔈𝔦𝔤𝔥𝔱𝔥 𝔓𝔞𝔰𝔰𝔢𝔫𝔤𝔢𝔯
    Quote from: whiterabbit on Dec 30, 2018, 06:27:23 AM
    I thought the rumors were that Disney was going to shelve the fox moniker in the next 18-24 months... then again it is just a rumor.

    Bob Iger originally only mentioned that the Fox Searchlight and Fox 2000 divisions would be kept after the merger. People assumed from that, that 20th Century Fox would therefore be shelved. However, the latest news suggests that 20th Century Fox would be kept as a separate brand under Disney much like Marvel and Lucasfilm. Emma Watts (who worked with Ridley Scott to help realize the prequels) would effectively become Fox's version of Kathleen Kennedy.

    QuoteWhile it doesn't look like 20th Century Fox's chairman/CEO Stacey Snider will be sticking around (as Alan Horn would likely take her role) post-merger there is now word from THR that Vice Chair Emma Watts will have a new role at Disney.

    Watts, a seasoned production executive with strong talent relationships, is in a different position. Her exact role at Disney is still being hammered out, although her duties are almost certain to involve guiding films now in the 20th Century Fox pipeline, including the marquee Avatar and Kingsman franchises (in recent days, Kingsman 3 was dated for release on Nov. 8, 2019).

    Watts has strong ties to such filmmakers and talent as James Cameron, Ryan Reynolds, Matthew Vaughn, Ridley Scott and Matt Reeves.

    There are also signs that 20th Century Fox (with Watts overseeing), Fox 2000, and Fox Searchlight (Bob Iger has suggested they won't be touching it) could stay as in and just report directly to Alan Horn. Not unlike other studios like Marvel, Pixar, and Lucasfilm under the Disney umbrella

    https://thegww.com/20th-century-foxs-vice-chair-emma-watts-takes-new-role-at-disney-overseeing-future-fox-releases/
« Newer Comments 1234 Older Comments »
AvPGalaxy: About | Contact | Cookie Policy | Manage Cookie Settings | Privacy Policy | Legal Info
Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Patreon RSS Feed
Contact: General Queries | Submit News