The Hollywood Reporter have got a nice little Prometheus feature up. It’s sort of a preview of the upcoming May 25 issue of the Hollywood Reporter magazine. They’ve posted two new concept art pieces from the film as well as a couple of behind-the-scenes shots. The article also revealed the Prometheus budget to be between $120M to $130M and contains 1300 CGI shots. They’ve posted a lot of other snippets of information too. It should be a nice little article when the magazine comes out.
Thanks to seeasea for the news.
I can tell you that's a big gay nightmare too - I mean, there is limit to what you can stuff in your gob
Spoiler
We've already seen every (straight) man's nightmare in the Milburn scene.
One woman's nightmare ... is another woman's dream.
Besides, it seems that Ridleys visit to Camerons Avatar production, might have been one of several factors, convincing him to direct Prometheus himself. Cameron is quoted as having told Ridley flat out, that he should be doing sci-fi instead of making films about winemaking in France
PS: that second concept art pic - that's totally Tatooine
I suppose he has a right to say that he was pissed off, it's not as if he himself is still saying that he's still pissed off
But it's hardly Scott vs. Cameron. They seem to have a very healthy respect for each other's contribution and respective films.
Interesting...
"I don't like the word 'prequel' because it communicates to an audience that they already know the ending."
Really, Lindelof? Really? This is the sole reason you dislike terming it a prequel, even though it is one? Oy... At least we now know the reason for this back-and-forth about it.
I hope the "pissed off" quote is out of context, because if he still feels that way, it's... Strange. Cameron had bothered to put together a story and script it. I don't recall anything about Scott doing similar for an 'Alien' sequel.