Quote from: Omegamorph on Feb 19, 2017, 07:58:25 PM
so what you have is the complete reversal of the thematic where in deep space you don't find other things but you find your makers/original ancestors or what have you who look exactly like you do. That's Von Daniken. Instead of finding unknowable things in deep space humanity finds itself. Deep as shit all you want (fits with the film's pretentiousness) but Lovecraftian it ain't, and any parallel to At the Mountains of Madness is purely superficial
I don't entirely agree with you, Omegamorph.
For example, Lovecraft himself likens the Old Ones in
At the Mountains of Madness to men:
Poor devils! After all, they were not evil things of their kind. They were the men of another age and another order of being. Nature had played a hellish jest on them -- as it will on any others that human madness, callousness, or cruelty may hereafter dig up in that hideously dead or sleeping polar waste -- and this was their tragic homecoming. They had not been even savages -- for what indeed had they done? That awful awakening in the cold of an unknown epoch -- perhaps an attack by the furry, frantically breaking quadrupeds, and a dazed defence against them and the equally frantic white simians with the queer wrappings and paraphernalia ... poor Lake, poor Gedney ... and poor Old Ones! Scientists to the last -- what had they done that would not have done in their place? God, what intelligence and persistence! What a facing of the incredible, just as those carven kinsmen and forebears had faced things only a little less incredible! Radiates, vegetables, monstrosities, star spawn -- whatever they had been, they were men!" (Lovecraft 495).
Lovecraft, H. P..
At the Mountains of Madness.
Necronomicon: The Best Weird Tales of H.P. Lovecraft. By H. P. Lovecraft and Stephen Jones. Gollancz, 2008. pp. 422-503.
Again, whatever they had been, they had been men, according to Lovecraft. So, I'm sorry, but I don't entirely agree with your argument, as far as Lovecraft's work is concerned, nor how it can be used in juxtaposition with Scott's own
Prometheus. There is in the great unknown not always things that are completely unknowable or unlike ourselves.
Does this mean I find Prometheus to be comparable to At the Mountains of Madness? Absolutely not. They are quite a bit different from each other. Prometheus is focused on God, and religion, and our makers. There is no focus whatever on the immense passage of time, and the terrifying inhabitants of the universe that aren't men, but something else. At the Mountains of Madness had this, and unveiled it slowly to the reader in deliberate craft. Prometheus did not, and any ideas it did have, regardless of their form, were barely explored, as it was chock-full of too many and not provided enough time or freedom to explore any of them.