Quote from: jeremy_ray on Apr 15, 2012, 08:28:29 AM
Quote from: escroto on Apr 15, 2012, 08:16:04 AM
Interesting. There's a lot of Giger's stuff going on in this film; what I don't understand is why others had to apply his ideas instead of Giger himself. Either Giger has been treated not very properly by Fox since "Aliens",
I'm going to guess Carlos Huante and Neville Page are considerably cheaper than Herr Giger, and fit into the Hollywood production pipeline better.
remember Giger was also kicked out from Cameron's "Aliens", no need to mention what Fox did to him in "Alien3"
After "Alien", one can only guess Giger ran into serious legal trouble (or maybe personal) with Fox, because If I recall well, this all started in "Aliens" as I said above.
I was really impressed (tbh) when I heard Giger was working for Scott in this new film, because this is a Fox movie after all. So the only argument I can come up with to explain why Giger did accept to work in this movie, and not only that, to "rent" (again, like he did in aliens and alien3) a lot of his old ideas in the form of his old paintings again to different people (this time are thse Neville and Huarte dudes you talk about), is just his old friendship with Scott.
Money as the next excuse?, with his old age?, I very much doubt that, after all he is an artist, an already old artist I mean.
Those dudes finding the similarities between that Giger' piece of work and Holloway's eye worm is another "Bulls Eye" coming from those forum guys. Kudos to them.