Quote from: Hubbs on Apr 04, 2014, 04:21:55 AM
Told you all it was pants
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KO0hy2olg9k
Quote from: Requiem28 on Feb 13, 2014, 06:45:08 AM
I'm sure Bane had the same affect on the people wanting to go see TDKR.
Quote from: Nightmare Asylum on Feb 27, 2014, 02:39:40 PMSpeaking of Heimdall, I noticed a few people mention that they didn't really buy him not being able to see the Dark Elf ships approaching. It seemed to me, though, that throughout the entire film the Elves were beyond his gaze until they were literally right in front of him and in Asgard. I'd say that that makes sense (comic book movie sense, at least), seeing as they predate the entire known universe that Heimdall has access to.
Quote from: Gazz on Feb 12, 2014, 02:41:20 AM
Actually it's more like saying Robin Hood Prince of Thieves would be less than average if it wasn't for Alan Rickman's scenery chewing performance as the Sheriff of Nottingham. There's really nothing ridiculous about the point Hubb's raised. He thinks that Tom Hiddlestone's Loki is a bright spark that elevates an otherwise dull and generic film.
Quote from: Gazz on Feb 12, 2014, 02:41:20 AM
Actually it's more like saying Robin Hood Prince of Thieves would be less than average if it wasn't for Alan Rickman's scenery chewing performance as the Sheriff of Nottingham. There's really nothing ridiculous about the point Hubb's raised. He thinks that Tom Hiddlestone's Loki is a bright spark that elevates an otherwise dull and generic film.
Quote from: Hubbs on Feb 12, 2014, 12:38:00 AM
Completely agree with this. Bottom line if you remove Loki from this film there is nothing left
Quote from: Magegg on Feb 11, 2014, 05:24:18 PM
I think they did Thor 2 mainly to showcase Loki again and sort of "redeem" him, and all the rest of the plot was something they took out from the sleeve without making a real effort.