Latest News

Post Comment
Comments: 318
« Newer Comments 1234567 Older Comments »
  1. Keyes
    I do muppet ^^  Our rating system is very wierd. Die Hard 4 was a PG-13 in the US and a 15 here. Get this though.... Terminator 3 was a US "R" rated and here a 12A! I couldn't believe it! My little cousin was freaked out during the "hand-through-the-driver's-body" scene   ;D  
  2. Starkiller
    AVPer zen, I was old enough. Ratings are in place for a good reason and anyone not old enough to get in and see them shouldn't be allowed. So no, every person does NOT have the same right to see it if they aren't old enough. If that was the case there would be no movie ratings and every movie would be exempt from classification. And I wanted AvP-R to be an 18 because I don't wan't to be in a cinema with a load of under 15's who managed to get in who shouldn't even be in there watching it. The Alien & Predator movies are adult movies, not kid movies like the first AvP was. Being one of the older fans who have grown up with the franchise I wanted this movie to be an 18 which is one of the things that alot of the older fans wanted to see happen ____________________  I agree
  3. AVPer
    zen, I was old enough. Ratings are in place for a good reason and anyone not old enough to get in and see them shouldn't be allowed. So no, every person does NOT have the same right to see it if they aren't old enough. If that was the case there would be no movie ratings and every movie would be exempt from classification. And I wanted AvP-R to be an 18 because I don't wan't to be in a cinema with a load of under 15's who managed to get in who shouldn't even be in there watching it. The Alien & Predator movies are adult movies, not kid movies like the first AvP was. Being one of the older fans who have grown up with the franchise I wanted this movie to be an 18 which is one of the things that alot of the older fans wanted to see happen.
  4. Futurfry
    Not that I care, but how could the BBFC rate this movie so low? I mean, don't you guys remember the very first trailer we saw? You know, the red banned trailer, where the two guys get their heads blasted off, another person gets his face ruined by the Aliens's acid and one more character gets an Alien's tail right trought his head, do you remember that one? Wasn't that at all contet for a strongly R rated motion picture? I'm adult anyway, so I don't worry about not getting my tickets because of my age, but I'm sort of confused that this kind of material is meant to be consumed by youths. Yeah, nowadays they're used to intense gore in the media and the majority can handle it, but what do you have to produce in those days, to get an "Horror"-movie for grown ups only?  My thought is, that the mentioned scenes are cut pretty short. You know, like the chestbuster-sequence in the first AVP-film. Anyway... still looking forward to the final product.    :)  
  5. zen
    AVPer:How old were you when A1 came out?.I was less the 2 years old when P2 came out.I for one think that every person has the same right to see it.No matter what they're age.And just because some person say's that they're not going to see it does'nt mean you dont have to!.If my family say's that they're not going to see it then that's fine,because i'll just walk the 20 or so miles through snow and ice and wild animals to go see it at the theater   ;)  .
  6. zen
    Also for those of you who are still complaining about the shortness of the movie,P1 was 107 minutes long because they needed to introduce the predator.A1 was 117 minutes long because they needed to introduce the alien.In AVPR you dont need the extra 20 minutes to introduce the E.T.s because you already know about them and so if they did re-introduce the E.T.s you'd be sitting there for 20 minutes going "Oh geez!.When is it going to get to the good parts!?!".94 minutes is enough time to fully cover the story   ;D  .
  7. zen
    G:general audience. PG:parental guidance suggested. PG-13:parental guidance suggested for children under 13. R:restricted,no children under 17 alowd without a parent or gaurdian. NC-17:No children under 17 alowd.  Just thought you'd like to know!   ;D  .
  8. ChAoS
    dont worry this film will be great,dont be fooled by the 15 cert.as long as its a good film it dont matter,avp(2) is very gorey from the looks of it so why whine.  i understand that a 15 here is very gruesome but i watched saw4 other day and that had hardly any gore wat so ever.and thats an 18.very confusing.
  9. zen
    If theres a whole lot of people working on the film then you whould need longer credits to show all of they're names,whereas if you've only got about three guys then the credits can be shown at the begining and it'll take only about 4 seconds.Also keep in mind people that when Wilma Flintstone got pregnant EVERYONE went ballistic!.Now in everyother cartoon someone is pregnant.In the T.V. show The Munsters Lily and Herman shared a bed together,and back then spouses had seperate beds and a bed in the attic to....you know.And when the movie PSYKO came out everyone said it was too violent,and people actualy screamed in the theaters!.Now you see more violence in that T.V. show Family Guy.So just relax and calm down!!!   ;D  .
  10. Rob - - - - - - ski
    93 minutes long unedited from the American's cut. Let's hope that unlike AVP, that out it's 100 that 11 of them are credits, that it doesn't have long credits making the film shorter. Who has heard of a film with a WHOLE NINTH of their film JUST CREDITS!!
  11. YAUTJA
    eyesofthedemon, is right, 30 days of night's a 15, and that was realy gory, e.g.( peoples heads chewed off, axed off, cut in half with saws and chucked into a grinding machine-and yes you see evrything!), that includes a kid too!, so....i still have faith. AVPer is right too- i hate it wen the imature brats get in an jst mess about, totaly ruins it 4 us.
  12. AVPer
    This sucks because now all the 13 and 14 year olds will no doubt be able to pass for 15 and get in to see it, and no offence to any under 18' s here but that is one of the reasons I never went to the cinema to see the first AVP, seeing a que of kids waiting to get in and see it put me off and alot of other people. It will be the same around this time, I have already been told by at least 20 people I know who are in their 20's and 30's that they aren't bothering to go and see it now and I doubt very much that I will either. Going back to the roots? Yeah right!
  13. RidgeTop
    Wow Im really suprised, I thought America was more leinent towards violence.  I mean you see a pregnant girl get implanted and killed for god sakes.  But Im sure they diddnt make any cuts or anything for you guys over in England.
  14. warchant-D
    hey everyone if you check out the actual BBFC site theres a few other troubling facts mentioned  -'The BBFC has placed this work in the ACTION genre(s).' doesnt mention suspence or horror  -"When a film is transferred to video the running time will be shorter by approximately 4% due to the differing number of frames per second. This does not mean that the video version has been cut or re-edited."  great, possibly even shorter now  WOW! dissapointing to say the least.
  15. thegodfather
    The Terminator has been re-certificated as a 15 from an 18 a few years back, and it didnt suffer any cuts. The Punisher was an 18 but should have been a 15, Troy/Gladiator/300/Kingdom of Heaven/30 days of Night/Dog Soldiers all have plenty of blood n' guts and they were 15. I am just a little peeved that its short but when the DVD comes out with that 'sub-plot' that the bros said they chopped out. So wait and see,
  16. eyesofthedemon
    Every one just chill!!!,i saw "30 days of night" a little while ago,Gory as hell and guess what rating it had? Exactly 15!!!! They taunt and then rip a young girl to pieces for gods sake!! I dont want "hostel 3",i want AVP!!!!!
  17. The Necronoir
    I don't know what you're all whining about. Here in Australia the highest any of the films has been rated is the uncut Predator 2, which only got an R-rating because of the drug-taking scenes anyway. Other than than every Alien and Predator film has been rated M15 or MA15+, simply because both America's PG13 and R translate into an Australian M15 or MA15+ (our R-rating is restricted for extremely violent or sexually explicit films and is hardly ever used). IN this respect the UK is much more similar to Australia than the US, so this means nothing! No change, no dumbing down, no cutting, so shut up!
  18. konradski
    15 in uk usualy means r in usa  just like saving private ryan was 15 uk yet us r rated usa so when the american made film avp2 suggest it will be an 18 by their film staff etc, it does not neccisarily mean to those from the uk it will be an 18 over here   please uk people reading. what the classification our country use,s differs imensly from the american standard as do all other countrys .were leniant on some stuff were as i dont want to sound daft the americans see other things as more to their tastes or not as it may be to others, i point out homosexuality ,smoking and naked blokes(not in a gay sense but in the same way as below)  yet they view female full nudity as ok and will rate a film lower for it  fck know what smokings got to do with making a movie a higher rating cos it,d mean theyd have to go thru the back catalog and re rate all me mothers movies 15 and the sexual tension in some would have them x rated
  19. killzonewithbladesandteeth
    having lived in both the UK and the US this is not really surprising to meI thinkt he UK has better tougher laws about at what age people should be allowed in to see certain types of movie for instance in the US I watched mothers taking children that looked as young as 3 or 4 to watch 28 days later and having to sit through the movie while their kids screamed because they didn't like what was going on. Yet in the UK if you are not 15 you ain't getting in to a 15 and people who work at cinemas will ask for proff of age. Bottom line is I dunno what people are getting upset about the 15 certificate this is still gonna be a great movie
  20. Red Rum
    300 waa 15 certificate and that was violent and bloody. Nothing has been edited from the movie so relax guys its just a rating, american and uk audiences are different and the bbfc or whatever are different in both countries.     ;D  
  21. I C 3 M 4 N
    Well uk fans (like myself) are going to be pissed. If this movie was 18 and had a slightly longer running time then that would have been the icing on the cake lol.
  22. Optimus Maximus Virus
    I must admit I am dissapointed, but I suppose no cuts have been made to the film and its still way gory and violent that Alien, Aliens & Predator.  I suppose they have done this because more people can watch the movie, so fox make's more money    :-\  
  23. Starkiller
    I know films that were rated 18 back in the day would only be a 15 now! because time, people and film making has changed, But its the fact another 15 Certificate AVP movie, Its just makes the film tacky, cheap and for kids!    >:(    This news has put a sour taste in my mouth!!
  24. YAUTJA
    who cares about ratings anyway? no one except the goody 2 shoes listen 2 them. iv wotched these movies for as long as i can remember, wen i was a kid i didnt want 2 whatch disney films or corny kids movies- i much prefered Arnie fighting off pred and Hicks fighting aliens, my oppinion-their pointless
  25. FRANKASTER
    sin city is a family movie in japan... so maybe when a jap tv channel got the rights for broadcast it, surely it'll be in open tv in a familiar channel at a very popular time like 4:00pm
  26. Starkiller
    THIS SUCKS! i am so dissapointed! I mean the originals were 18 so should this movie! Fox promises one thing and deliever another, okay so if they havn't cut anything from the film thats cool! but as far as advertising goes another 15 AVP movie! Come On!  This f**king sucks!
« Newer Comments 1234567 Older Comments »
Facebook Twitter Instagram Steam RSS Feed